alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
State Facility Name Facility ID (ORISPL) Unit ID Year SO2 (tons) Avg. NOx Rate (lb/MMBtu) NOx (tons)

AR Independence 6641 1 2009 12254.112 0.247 6610.405

AR Independence 6641 1 2010 14916.687 0.2449 7840.682

AR Independence 6641 1 2011 15307.855 0.2442 7013.311

AR Independence 6641 1 2012 16232.508 0.1968 5364.48

AR Independence 6641 1 2013 12581.188 0.2075 4737.474

AR Independence 6641 2 2009 15171.182 0.2381 7727.701

AR Independence 6641 2 2010 13757.957 0.2461 6777.974

AR Independence 6641 2 2011 15090.108 0.2269 6397.368

AR Independence 6641 2 2012 16741.242 0.2012 5702.292

AR Independence 6641 2 2013 16273.094 0.207 5976.929
 Heat Input (MMBtu) Fuel Type (Primary) Fuel Type (Secondary) Operating Status Unit Type Owner Operator SO2 Control(s)

5.32E+07 Coal Residual Oil Operating Tangentially-fired Arkansas Electric Cooperative Corporation, City of JEntergy Corporation

6.37E+07 Coal Residual Oil Operating Tangentially-fired Arkansas Electric Cooperative Corporation, City of JEntergy Corporation

5.72E+07 Coal Residual Oil Operating Tangentially-fired Arkansas Electric Cooperative Corporation, City of JEntergy Corporation

5.53E+07 Coal Residual Oil Operating Tangentially-fired Arkansas Electric Cooperative Corporation, City of JEntergy Corporation

4.57E+07 Coal Residual Oil Operating Tangentially-fired Arkansas Electric Cooperative Corporation, City of JEntergy Corporation

6.46E+07 Coal Residual Oil Operating Tangentially-fired Arkansas Electric Cooperative Corporation, City of JEntergy Corporation

5.51E+07 Coal Residual Oil Operating Tangentially-fired Arkansas Electric Cooperative Corporation, City of JEntergy Corporation

5.63E+07 Coal Residual Oil Operating Tangentially-fired Arkansas Electric Cooperative Corporation, City of JEntergy Corporation

5.72E+07 Coal Residual Oil Operating Tangentially-fired Arkansas Electric Cooperative Corporation, City of JEntergy Corporation

5.87E+07 Coal Residual Oil Operating Tangentially-fired Arkansas Electric Cooperative Corporation, City of JEntergy Corporation
 NOx Control(s)

Overfire Air

Overfire Air

Overfire Air

Overfire Air

Overfire Air

Overfire Air

Overfire Air

Overfire Air

Overfire Air

Overfire Air
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 134 

To authorize the Mescalero Apache Tribe to lease adjudicated water rights. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 25 (legislative day, JANUARY 5), 2011 

Mr. BINGAMAN (for himself and Mr. UDALL of New Mexico) introduced the 

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs 

A BILL 

To authorize the Mescalero Apache Tribe to lease adjudicated 

water rights. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Mescalero Apache 

5 Tribe Leasing Authorization Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS. 

7 In this Act: 

8 (1) ADJUDICATED WATER RIGHTS.—The term 

9 ‘‘adjudicated water rights’’ means water rights that 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 134 IS

1 were adjudicated to the Tribe in State v. Lewis, 116 

2 N.M. 194, 861 P. 2d 235 (1993). 

3 (2) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means 

4 the Secretary of the Interior. 

5 (3) STATE.—The term ‘‘State’’ means the State 

6 of New Mexico. 

7 (4) TRIBE.—The term ‘‘Tribe’’ means the Mes8 calero Apache Tribe. 

9 SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATION TO LEASE ADJUDICATED WATER 

10 RIGHTS. 

11 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi12 sion of law, subject to subsections (b) and (c), the Tribe 

13 may lease, enter into a contract with respect to, or other14 wise transfer to another party, for another purpose, or to 

15 another place of use in the State, all or any portion of 

16 the adjudicated water rights. 

17 (b) STATE LAW.—In carrying out any action under 

18 subsection (a), the Tribe shall comply with all laws (in19 cluding regulations) of the State with respect to the leas20 ing or transfer of water rights. 

21 (c) ALIENATION; MAXIMUM TERM.— 

22 (1) ALIENATION.—The Tribe shall not perma23 nently alienate any adjudicated water rights. 

24 (2) MAXIMUM TERM.—The term of any water 

25 use lease, contract, or other agreement under this 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 134 IS

1 section (including a renewal of such an agreement) 

2 shall be not more than 99 years. 

3 (d) LIABILITY.—The Secretary shall not be liable to 

4 the Tribe or any other person for any loss or other det5 riment resulting from a lease, contract, or other arrange6 ment entered into pursuant to this section. 

7 (e) PURCHASES OR GRANTS OF LAND FROM INDI8 ANS.—The authorization provided by this Act for the leas9 ing, contracting, and transfer of the adjudicated water 

10 rights shall be considered to satisfy any requirement for 

11 authorization of the action by treaty or convention im12 posed by section 2116 of the Revised Statutes (25 U.S.C. 

13 177). 

14 (f) PROHIBITION ON FORFEITURE.—The nonuse of 

15 all or any portion of the adjudicated water rights by a 

16 lessee or contractor shall not result in the forfeiture, aban17 donment, relinquishment, or other loss of all or any por18 tion of the adjudicated water rights. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
July 25, 1938

No. 39108.

#### Protest 761906-G of Justin Rharaud, Inc.

Abstract 38876. Application by plaintiff for rehearing granted.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 14 (Tuesday, January 23, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 2900]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-895]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management


Meeting of the California Desert Advisory Council

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given, in accordance with Public Law 92-463 
and 94-579, that the California Desert District Advisory Council to the 
Bureau of Land Management, U.S. Department of the Interior, will 
participate in a field tour of BLM-administered public lands on Friday, 
March 9, 2007, from 7:30 a.m. to 5 p.m., and meet in formal session on 
Saturday, March 10 from 8 a.m. to 3 p.m. at the Ramada Inn, 1511 East 
Main Street, East Main & Interstate 15, Barstow, CA 92311.
    The Council and interested members of the public will depart for 
the field tour at 7:30 a.m. from the main lobby of the Ramada Inn. The 
public is welcome to participate in the tour but should plan on 
providing their own transportation, lunch, and beverage.
    Agenda topics for the formal session on Saturday will include 
updates by Council members and reports from the BLM District Manager 
and five field office managers. Additional agenda topics are being 
developed. Once finalized, the field tour and meeting agendas will be 
published in a news release prior to the meeting and posted on the BLM 
California state Web site at http://www.blm.gov/ca/news/rac.html.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: All Desert District Advisory Council 
meetings are open to the public. Public comment for items not on the 
agenda will be scheduled at the beginning of the meeting Saturday 
morning. Time for public comment may be made available by the Council 
Chairman during the presentation of various agenda items, and is 
scheduled at the end of the meeting for topics not on the agenda.
    While the Saturday meeting is tentatively scheduled from 8 a.m. to 
3 p.m., the meeting could conclude prior to 3 p.m. should the Council 
conclude its presentations and discussions. Therefore, members of the 
public interested in a particular agenda item or discussion should 
schedule their arrival accordingly.
    Written comments may be filed in advance of the meeting for the 
California Desert District Advisory Council, c/o Bureau of Land 
Management, External Affairs, 22835 Calle San Juan de Los Lagos, Moreno 
Valley, California 92553. Written comments also are accepted at the 
time of the meeting and, if copies are provided to the recorder, will 
be incorporated into the minutes.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stephen Razo, BLM California Desert 
District External Affairs (951) 697-5217.

    Dated: January 16, 2007.
Steven J. Borchard,
District Manager.
 [FR Doc. E7-895 Filed 1-22-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-AG-P
DESCRIPTION OF AN AMENDMENT IN THE NATURE OF

A SUBSTITUTE TO THE PROVISIONS OF H.R. 6756,

THE “AMERICAN INNOVATION ACT OF 2018”

The Chairman’s amendment in the nature of a substitute makes a clerical change to the 

effective date of section 3 of the proposal to refer to amendments made by the section, rather 

than subsection.

JOINT COMMITTEE ON TAXATION

September 12, 2018

JCX-77-18
# C_2017283EN.01003102.xml

| 28.8.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 283/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.8.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 283/31

---

Judgment of the General Court of 14 July 2017 — Certified Angus Beef v EUIPO — Certified Australian Angus Beef (CERTIFIED AUSTRALIAN ANGUS BEEF)

(Case T-55/15) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - International registration designating the European Union - Figurative mark CERTIFIED AUSTRALIAN ANGUS BEEF - Earlier well-known figurative and word marks SINCE 1978 CERTIFIED ANGUS BEEF BRAND and CERTIFIED ANGUS BEEF BRAND - Relative ground for refusal - No similarity between the signs - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2017/C 283/46)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Certified Angus Beef LLC (Wooster, Ohio, United States) (represented by: C. Aikens, Barrister)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Fischer and A. Söder, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Certified Australian Angus Beef Pty Ltd (Surrey Hills, Australia)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 30 October 2014 (Case R 662/2014-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Certified Angus Beef and Certified Australian Angus Beef.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Certified Angus Beef LLC to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Certified Angus Beef LLC to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 107, 30.3.2015.

1

---
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# DFSP Charleston excels in surprise oil spill exercise

By Ronald Inman, DLA Energy Public Affairs

                CHARLESTON, South Carolina  –              

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

Defense Fuel Support Point Charleston
<PAGE>   1
                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.158


                                   DEMAND NOTE

$300,000.00                                                   New York, New York
                                                              November 2, 1999

        FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned, Wilshire Technologies, Inc. a
California corporation (hereinafter referred to as "Borrower"), hereby
unconditionally PROMISES TO PAY to the order to TRILON DOMINION PARTNERS, LLC, a
Delaware limited liability company ("Lender"), at 245 Park Avenue, 28th Floor,
New York, NY 10167, or at such other place as the holder of this Demand Note may
designate from time to time in writing, in lawful money of the United States of
America and in immediately available funds, the principal amount of Three
Hundred Thousand and 00/100, DOLLARS ($300,000.00), together with interest on
the unpaid principal amount of this Demand Note outstanding from time to time
from the date hereof, at a rate per annum equal to the Prime rate of interest
plus 3.0%, or the highest rate permitted by law, whichever shall be less.

        The principal amount of the indebtedness evidenced hereby shall be
payable on demand. Interest thereon shall be paid when principal is paid from
the date hereof until such principal amount is paid in full at such interest
rate as specified above. Following failure to pay on demand, Borrower agrees to
pay interest on any overdue payment of principal at a rate per annum equal to
the stated interest rate plus 5%, or the highest rate permitted by law,
whichever shall be less. All interest calculations shall be computed on the
basis of a 360 day year.

        Demand, presentment, protest and notice of nonpayment and protest are
hereby waived by Borrower.

        Borrower shall have no right to make any off-set against or deduct from
any payment due under this Demand Note.

        Principal and interest may be prepaid at any time without penalty.

        This Demand Note may not be changed orally, but only by an agreement in
writing and signed by the party against whom enforcement of such change is
sought.

        All covenants of Borrower in this Demand Note and all rights of the
holder under this Demand Note shall bind Borrower and its successors and
assigns, and all such covenants and rights shall inure to the benefit of the
holder of this Demand Note and its successors and assigns.

        This Demand Note has been delivered and accepted at New York, New York
and shall be interpreted, governed by, and construed in accordance with, the
laws of the State of New York.

                                             Wilshire Technologies, Inc.

                                             By :   /s/ Kathleen E. Terry
                                                    ----------------------------
                                             Name:  Kathleen E. Terry
                                             Title: Chief Financial Officer
No. 62124

Suit 4920.

#### Seattle Marine & Fishing Supply Company and Robert E. Landweer & Company, Inc. *v.*United States.

C. D, 1857 affirmed March 14, 1958. C. A. D. 679.
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1364 

To ensure the timely payment of Social Security benefits in August 2011. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 13, 2011 

Mr. NELSON of Florida introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To ensure the timely payment of Social Security benefits 

in August 2011. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Social Security Benefit 

5 Protection Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. TIMELY PAYMENT OF AUGUST 2011 SOCIAL SECU7 RITY BENEFITS. 

8 (a) GUARANTEE OF SOCIAL SECURITY BENEFIT

9 PAYMENTS.—In addition to any other authority provided 

10 by law and for the purpose of ensuring that payments to 

11 beneficiaries are not barred or delayed, the Secretary of 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1364 IS

1 the Treasury may issue under chapter 31 of title 31, 

2 United States Code, obligations of the United States in 

3 an amount equal to the monthly insurance benefits pay4 able under title II of the Social Security Act in August 

5 2011. 

6 (b) OBLIGATIONS EXEMPT FROM PUBLIC DEBT

7 LIMIT.— 

8 (1) IN GENERAL.—Obligations issued under 

9 subsection (a) shall not be taken into account in ap10 plying the limitation in section 3101(b) of title 31, 

11 United States Code. 

12 (2) TERMINATION OF EXEMPTION.—Paragraph 

13 (1) shall cease to apply on the earlier of— 

14 (A) the date of the enactment of the first 

15 increase in the limitation in section 3101(b) of 

16 title 31, United States Code, after the date of 

17 the enactment of this Act, or 

18 (B) August 31, 2011. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
No. 6180.

#### HOEHN & DIETH vs. MASSACHUSETTS BONDING INSURANCE COMPANY.

Syllabus.

'Between equally credible witnesses the presumption is in favor of the one who swears affirmatively.

Appeal from the Civil District Court for the Parish of Orleans, Division “C,” No. 105,942. Honorable E. K. Skinner, Judge.

¡Charles Louque, for plaintiff and appellee.

*39Mentz, Hollingsworth & Mayer, for defendant and appellant.

His Honor, JOHN ST. PAUL,

rendered the opinion and decree :of the Court, as follows:

This is a suit upon an insurance policy against loss by burglary. The main defense is that there was no visible evidence of a forcible entry as required by the terms of the policy.

The evidence shows that plaintiffs’ store was closed and locked on a Sunday at noon; that a large quantity of goods was found missing on the next morning, the greater portion of which was recovered by the police from the possession of a party who had no connection with the establishment.

A reputable and expert locksmith, who was called upon at once to change the' lock, found this unnecessary and pointed out that the front door had been pried open with some • instrument, the marks of which he found in the crack between the two panels of the door. These marks, he testified, were still visible at the time the case was tried, and offered to point them out to Court and counsel if they wished to accompany him.

As to the existence of these marks, he is corroborated by plaintiffs’ junior partner.

On the other hand three witnesse for defendant examined the premises and failed to see any marks of forcible entry.

The trial Judge correctly attached more weight to the affirmative testimony of two witnesses (one wholly disinterested) than to the negative testimony of defendant’s witnesses. Between equally credible witnesses the presumption is in favor of the one who swears, affirmatively.

1 Hennen’s Digest, p. 557, No. 12.

*40Opinion and decree, October 26th, 1914.

Rehearing refused, November 23rd, 1914.

• .Plaintiffs have established, with all reasonable certainty the .amount of their loss; the number and value of goods not recovered and the damage of those recovered is shown as well by their own testimony as by that of disinterested ¡outside witnesses.

The judgment ¡appealed from is correct.

Judgment affirmed.
No. 54305.

#### Ying Chong Lung *v.*United States,

protest 711399-G (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain of the merchandise consists of birds’ nests the same in all material respects as those involved in *Quong Lee & Co.*v. *United States*(20 C. C. P. A. 192, T. D. 45981), the claim at 10 percent under paragraph 1558 was sustained. Milled rice, namely 2.2 percent thereof by weight, stipulated to consist of broken rice of the same character and description as that the subject of Abstract 48704, was held dutiable at five-eights of 1 cent per pound under paragraph 727 as claimed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>               <C>              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS             6-MOS            YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-1999      DEC-31-1999      DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                  JUN-30-1999      JUN-30-1999      DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                 0           14,986           47,049
<SECURITIES>                           0                0                0
<RECEIVABLES>                          0                0                0
<ALLOWANCES>                           0                0                0
<INVENTORY>                            0                0                0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                       0        4,087,349        4,192,881
<PP&E>                                 0                0                0
<DEPRECIATION>                         0                0                0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         0        4,102,335        4,239,930
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                  0        1,667,823        1,653,455
<BONDS>                                0                0                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                  0                0                0
<PREFERRED>                            0                0                0
<COMMON>                               0                0                0
<OTHER-SE>                             0        2,434,512        2,586,475
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           0        4,102,335        4,239,930
<SALES>                                0                0                0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                     203              500                0
<CGS>                                  0                0                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                          0                0                0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                  76,946          152,463                0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                       0                0                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                     0                0                0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  (76,743)        (151,963)               0
<INCOME-TAX>                           0                0                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                    0                0                0
<DISCONTINUED>                         0                0                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                        0                0                0
<CHANGES>                              0                0                0
<NET-INCOME>                     (76,743)        (151,963)               0
<EPS-BASIC>                          0                0                0
<EPS-DILUTED>                          0                0                0


</TABLE>