alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1348 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1348

  To amend title 36, United States Code, to encourage the nationwide 
        observance of two minutes of silence each Veterans Day.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 12, 2011

 Mr. Brown of Massachusetts (for himself, Mr. Lieberman, Mr. Webb, Mr. 
Inhofe, Mr. Casey, and Mr. Begich) introduced the following bill; which 
     was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 36, United States Code, to encourage the nationwide 
        observance of two minutes of silence each Veterans Day.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Veterans Day Moment of Silence 
Act''.

SEC. 2. OBSERVANCE OF VETERANS DAY.

    (a) Two Minutes of Silence.--Chapter 1 of title 36, United States 
Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section:
``Sec. 145. Veterans Day
    ``The President shall each year issue a proclamation calling on the 
people of the United States to observe two minutes of silence on 
Veterans Day, beginning at 2:11 p.m. eastern time, in honor of the 
service and sacrifice of veterans throughout the history of the 
Nation.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections for chapter 1 of 
title 36, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the 
following new item:

``145. Veterans Day.''.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2019288EN.01004301.xml

| 26.8.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 288/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.8.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 288/43

---

Judgment of the General Court of 2 July 2019 — Fulmen v Council

(Case T-405/15) (1)

(Non-contractual liability - Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures taken against the Islamic Republic of Iran - Freezing of funds - Compensation for harm allegedly suffered by the applicant following the inclusion and retention of its name on lists of persons and entities subject to restrictive measures - Material damage - Non-material damage)

(2019/C 288/55)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Fulmen (Teheran, Iran) (represented by: A. Bahrami and N. Korogiannakis, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: R. Liudvinaviciute-Cordeiro and M. Bishop, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: European Commission (represented initially by A. Aresu and D. Gauci, and subsequently by A. Aresu and R. Tricot, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application on the basis of Article 268 TFEU seeking compensation for the harm allegedly suffered by the applicant following the adoption of Council Decision 2010/413/CFSP of 26 July 2010 concerning restrictive measures against Iran and repealing Common Position 2007/140/CFSP (OJ 2010 L 195, p.39), Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2010 of 26 July 2010 implementing Article 7(2) of Regulation (EC) No 423/2007 concerning restrictive measures against Iran (OJ 2010 L 195, p. 25), Council Decision 2010/644/CFSP of 25 October 2010 amending Decision 2010/413 (OJ 2010 L 281 p 81, ), and Council Regulation (EU) No 961/2010 of 25 October 2010 on restrictive measures against Iran and repealing Regulation (EC) No 423/2007 (OJ 2010 L 281, p.1), by which the name of the applicant was included and retained on the lists of persons and entities subject to restrictive measures.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Orders the Council of the European Union to pay Fulmen compensation of EUR 50 000 for the non-material damage suffered; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Orders the Council of the European Union to pay Fulmen compensation of EUR 50 000 for the non-material damage suffered;

| 2. | Dismisses the action as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

| 3. | Orders Fulmen, the Council and the Commission to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Fulmen, the Council and the Commission to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 337, 12.10.2015.

---
No. 47588.

#### Protests 972777-G, etc., of Gemsco, Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items of the merchandise in question consist of woven fabrics similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Meyer*v. *United States*(6 Cust. Ct. 191, C. D. 459) the claim at 40 percent under paragraph 385 and T. D. 48316 was sustained as to those items.
### Ground water in the Prineville area, Crook County, Oregon

By: J. W. RobinsonDon Price

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1619P

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
No. 46975.

#### Protest 985405-G of M. M. DuPouey.

C. D. 573. Government’s application for rehearing granted.
No. 50269.

#### Protests 51650-K, etc., of B. F. Drakenfeld & Co. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the court found that the facts herein agreed upon were such as to bring the case within the holding in *John Barr*v. *United States*(11 Cust. Ct. 88, C. D. 801), which record was incorporated herein. (See *John Barr*v. *United States,*324 U. S. 83, decided February 5, 1945.) In accordance therewith it was held that the currency of the invoices should be converted at the buyihg rate in the New York market at noon on the day of exportation (the “free” rate of exchange for pounds sterling), as certified by the Federal Reserve bank and set forth by the collector on each of the entries. The protests were sustained to this extent.
II 

Calendar No. 304 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 1296 

[Report No. 112–138] 

To revise the boundaries of John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources System 

Sachuest Point Unit RI–04P, Easton Beach Unit RI–05P, Almy Pond 

Unit RI–06, and Hazards Beach Unit RI–07 in the State of Rhode 

Island. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 29, 2011 

Mr. WHITEHOUSE (for himself and Mr. REED) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 

Public Works 

JANUARY 26, 2012 

Reported by Mrs. BOXER, without amendment 

A BILL 

To revise the boundaries of John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier 

Resources System Sachuest Point Unit RI–04P, Easton 

Beach Unit RI–05P, Almy Pond Unit RI–06, and Hazards Beach Unit RI–07 in the State of Rhode Island. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•S 1296 RS

1 SECTION 1. REPLACEMENT OF JOHN H. CHAFEE COASTAL 

2 BARRIER RESOURCES SYSTEM MAP. 

3 (a) DEFINITION OF MAP.—In this section, the term 

4 ‘‘Map’’ means the map that— 

5 (1) is subtitled ‘‘Sachuest Point Unit RI–04P, 

6 Easton Beach Unit RI–05P, Almy Pond Unit RI– 

7 06, Hazards Beach Unit RI–07’’; 

8 (2) is included in the set of maps entitled 

9 ‘‘John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources Sys10 tem’’ (referred to in section 4(a) of the Coastal Bar11 rier Resources Act (16 U.S.C. 3503(a)) as the set 

12 of maps entitled ‘‘Coastal Barrier Resources Sys13 tem’’); and 

14 (3) relates to certain John H. Chafee Coastal 

15 Barrier Resources System units in the State of 

16 Rhode Island. 

17 (b) REPLACEMENT.—The Map is replaced by the 

18 map entitled ‘‘John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources 

19 System Sachuest Point Unit RI–04P, Easton Beach Unit 

20 RI–05P, Almy Pond Unit RI–06, and Hazards Beach 

21 Unit RI–07’’ and dated September 30, 2009. 

22 (c) AVAILABILITY.—The Secretary of the Interior 

23 shall keep the replacement map referred to in subsection 

24 (b) on file and available for inspection in accordance with 

25 section 4(b) of the Coastal Barrier Resources Act (16 

26 U.S.C. 3503(b)). 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

Calendar No. 304 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 1296 

[Report No. 112–138] 

A BILL 

To revise the boundaries of John H. Chafee Coastal 

the State of Rhode Island. Unit RI–06, and Hazards Beach Unit RI–07 in RI–04P, Easton Beach Unit RI–05P, Almy Pond Barrier Resources System Sachuest Point Unit 

JANUARY 26, 2012 

Reported without amendment 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 22 - 0473 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. PHILIP BRYSON GRIMSHAW,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including March 1 , 202 3 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

January 23 2023

01/23/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0473
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Security Intelligence
Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended September 30, 2005, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Ben Jamil, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I,
Chris R. Decker, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, do hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:  November 18, 2005           /s/ Ben Jamil
                                    -------------------------------
                                    Ben Jamil
                                    Chief Executive Officer


Dated:  November 18, 2005           /s/ Chris R. Decker
                                    -------------------------------
                                    Chris R. Decker
                                    Chief Financial Officer


This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 130 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 130

 To prohibit authorized committees and leadership PACs from employing 
  the spouse or immediate family members of any candidate or Federal 
               office holder connected to the committee.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             January 25 (legislative day, January 5), 2011

  Mr. Vitter introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
         referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To prohibit authorized committees and leadership PACs from employing 
  the spouse or immediate family members of any candidate or Federal 
               office holder connected to the committee.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON EMPLOYMENT OF FAMILY MEMBERS OF A CANDIDATE 
              OR FEDERAL OFFICE HOLDER BY CERTAIN POLITICAL COMMITTEES.

    (a) In General.--Title III of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 
1971 (2 U.S.C. 431 et seq.) is amended by inserting after section 324 
the following new section:

``SEC. 325. PROHIBITION ON EMPLOYMENT OF FAMILY MEMBERS OF A CANDIDATE 
              OR FEDERAL OFFICE HOLDER BY CERTAIN POLITICAL COMMITTEES.

    ``(a) In General.--It shall be unlawful for any authorized 
committee of a candidate or any other political committee established, 
maintained, or controlled by a candidate or a person who holds a 
Federal office to employ--
            ``(1) the spouse of such candidate or Federal office 
        holder; or
            ``(2) any immediate family member of such candidate or 
        Federal office holder.
    ``(b) Immediate Family Member.--For purposes of subsection (a), the 
term `immediate family member' means a son, daughter, stepson, 
stepdaughter, son-in-law, daughter-in-law, mother, father, stepmother, 
stepfather, mother-in-law, father-in-law, brother, sister, stepbrother, 
or stepsister of the Member.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall take 
effect on the date of the enactment of this Act.

SEC. 2. SPOUSE LOBBYING MEMBER.

    Section 207(e) of title 18, United States Code, is amended by 
adding at the end the following:
            ``(10) Spouses.--Any person who is the spouse of a Member 
        of Congress and who was not serving as a registered lobbyist at 
        least 1 year prior to the election of that Member of Congress 
        to office and who, after the election of such Member, knowingly 
        lobbies on behalf of a client for compensation any Member of 
        Congress or is associated with any such lobbying activity by an 
        employer of that spouse shall be punished as provided in 
        section 216 of this title.''.
                                 <all>
```
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 389 

Congratulating the Republic of Colombia on its successful rescue mission 

and thanking Colombian President A ́lvaro Uribe for the safe return 

of the Americans held hostage by the Revolutionary Armed Forces of 

Colombia. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 9, 2008 

Mr. BRADY of Texas (for himself, Mr. WELLER of Illinois, Mr. BLUNT, Ms. 

ROS-LEHTINEN, Mr. MCCRERY, Mr. HERGER, and Mr. DREIER) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Foreign Affairs 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Congratulating the Republic of Colombia on its successful 

rescue mission and thanking Colombian President A ́lvaro 

Uribe for the safe return of the Americans held hostage 

by the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia. 

Whereas the Government of Colombia carried out a historic 

rescue mission on July 2, 2008, freeing 15 hostages kidnapped and held in captivity by the Revolutionary Armed 

Forces of Colombia (FARC), a group the Department of 

State has designated as a Foreign Terrorist Organization; 

Whereas this mission was carried out without any violence; 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
2 

•HCON 389 IH 

Whereas the 3 freed American hostages, Marc Gonsalves, 

Keith Stansell, and Thomas Howes, were held in captivity since 2003; 

Whereas the release of former Colombian presidential candidate and senator Ingrid Betancourt and 11 Colombian 

hostages has brought hope and joy to Colombians and 

the French; 

Whereas the United States supports Colombia’s efforts to 

eradicate narcotics trade and terrorist activity in Colombia, and strengthen its democratic institutions to pave 

the way for peace; 

Whereas the United States has provided significant security 

assistance and training for the Colombian security forces 

through Plan Colombia; 

Whereas such United States assistance aided the Colombian 

military in preparing for the rescue mission; and 

Whereas the FARC reportedly still holds more than 700 hostages in captivity: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That Congress— 

3 (1) congratulates the Republic of Colombia on 

4 the successful rescue mission that resulted in the 

5 freeing of 15 hostages held by the Revolutionary 

6 Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC), without any 

7 loss of life; 

8 (2) commends the Colombian military for its 

9 careful planning of the mission and the brave Co10 lombian soldiers who executed the dramatic rescue; 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
3 

•HCON 389 IH 

1 (3) offers its deepest thanks and gratitude to 

President A ́ 2 lvaro Uribe and the people of Colombia 

3 for the safe return of the 3 American hostages, 

4 Marc Gonsalves, Thomas Howes, and Keith Stansell; 

5 (4) recognizes the close friendship between the 

6 United States and the Republic of Colombia; and 

7 (5) remembers the remaining hostages in cap8 tivity and calls upon the FARC to release all re9 maining hostages and cease hostilities immediately, 

10 without condition. 

Æ 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 307 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 307

  Expressing the sense of Congress that Members' Congressional papers 
   should be properly maintained and encouraging Members to take all 
        necessary measures to manage and preserve these papers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 4, 2008

     Mr. Brady of Pennsylvania submitted the following concurrent 
resolution; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
  Expressing the sense of Congress that Members' Congressional papers 
   should be properly maintained and encouraging Members to take all 
        necessary measures to manage and preserve these papers.

Whereas Members' Congressional papers (including papers of Delegates and 
        Resident Commissioners to the Congress) serve as indispensable sources 
        for the study of American representative democracy;
Whereas these papers document vital national, regional, and local public policy 
        issues;
Whereas these papers are crucial to the public's understanding of the role of 
        Congress in making the Nation's laws and responding to the needs of its 
        citizens;
Whereas because these papers serve as essential primary sources for the history 
        of Congress, the study of these papers will illuminate the careers of 
        individual Members;
Whereas by custom, these papers are considered the personal property of the 
        Member who receives and creates them, and it is therefore the Member who 
        is responsible to decide on their ultimate disposition; and
Whereas resources are available through the Office of the Clerk of the House of 
        Representatives and the Secretary of the Senate to assist Members with 
        the professional and cost-effective management and preservation of these 
        papers: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of Congress that--
            (1) Members' Congressional papers (including papers of 
        Delegates and Resident Commissioners to the Congress) should be 
        properly maintained;
            (2) each Member of Congress should take all necessary 
        measures to manage and preserve the Member's own Congressional 
        papers; and
            (3) each Member of Congress should be encouraged to arrange 
        for the deposit or donation of the Member's own noncurrent 
        Congressional papers with a research institution that is 
        properly equipped to care for them, and to make these papers 
        available for educational purposes at a time the Member 
        considers appropriate.
                                 <all>
```