alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATION**

I, A.W. Bergeron, certify that:

 

1.             Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of AES Red Oak, LLC (the“registrant”);

 

2.             Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.             Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.             Theregistrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

a)              Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

 

b)             Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

 

c)              Disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.             Theregistrant’s other certifying offices and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a)              all significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b)             any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

Date: August 9, 2004

 
|   |  /s/ A.W. Bergeron |
|--------|-------------------------|
|   | A.W.  Bergeron          |   |
|   |                    |   |
|   | President               |   |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial  information extracted from the balance
sheet of CNL  Health  Care  Properties,  Inc.  at  December  31,  1999,  and its
statement  of income for the twelve  months then ended and is  qualified  in its
entirety by reference to the Form 10-K of CNL Health Care  Properties,  Inc. for
the twelve months ended December 31, 1999.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         4,744,222
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  15
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0 <F1>
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 5,088,560
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0 <F1>
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       5,400
<OTHER-SE>                                     3,286,737
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   5,088,560
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               86,231
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  114,621
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (28,390)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (28,390)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (28,390)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.07)
<FN>
<F1>Due to the nature  of  its industry, CNL Health Care Properties, Inc. has an
unclassified  balance  sheet;  therefore,  no values are shown above for current
assets and liabilities.
</FN>



</TABLE>
P.1 

OAR Box 1865 

Prepped by Charmelle Mathews 

Document Number: 

157) VI-E-6 

Docket Number: 

A-83-27 

Printed 12/3/2008 3:22:21 PM Sheet 157 of 198 
P.2 

RADIAN 

TELEPHONE CALL RECORD 

QIncoming Call 

(B6utgolng Call 

Person Calling 

jretAjL rZ.i-Uw 

Person Called 

bcMJirk/ 6iHt4*- -fchJattet Oil Co* 

General SubJ.ct ^ . J^a ? - ^^ ^ 

LPGf Prra. 

E'roject No. 

A34 -ooj-ieif-oz 

Project Hems 

Ind Bo/let Ubfta.fi' 

Date Tlat 

// 

Activity 

Activity 

A-8 2 

VI-Ei-27 

6 

TOPICS DISCUSSED AND ACTION TAKEN 

> Priu -fa* LPfy ~ ^dMSWicdL -US<. EPA frtfipy, \\f - tJCSC, Temr, 

Ws*,ci*,<54, ICY. 

> ?!, ropruier 

Ke*h<c>f-m-Y t&CJc. -pnOL -^/gat/on fo& 4k &- rekn-ery fgy tY

•24-.3D I aoLllff* roy Gut it -

frej'cUJ- (m^ffuM ^e & *r'(*>*-/^aMo-y^ - \^]ituld need -fo fojuc ^ 

rruckM-fr CoirVi.pt%v--y- (ruAjb •rya^sct -h> qef \oof-hm line cleii*ertmd pric

Price i/Qjjes based tm hcjQuhcTir. d- Cushrttr and mecih^ of 4r&hSp(7>4

il.natut. C>}W t A- rUtO
No. 55529.

#### Abraham & Straus, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 130894-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

The protests were dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-28-1999
<CASH>                                             645
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   645
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     645
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,200
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      4,000
<COMMON>                                         1,120
<OTHER-SE>                                     (5,675)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       645
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,470
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,470)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,470)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,470)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
H. Con. Res. 377 Agreed to June 27, 2008 

One Hundred Tenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and eight 

Concurrent Resolution 

Whereas African American men and women have served with 

distinction, courage, and honor in the United States Armed Forces 

throughout the history of the nation, even when they were denied 

the basic constitutional freedoms promised to all citizens; 

Whereas the practice of racial segregation and discrimination in 

the military prevented African Americans from receiving the full 

recognition to which they were entitled as a result of their service; 

Whereas African Americans, in leading the effort to protest discriminatory treatment in the armed forces, paved the way for successful integration of women, Asians, Hispanics, and other ethnic 

minorities; 

Whereas the dedicated and heroic service of African American men 

and women during World War II led to President Truman’s 

historic executive order 60 years ago that marked the beginning 

of racial integration in the United States Armed Forces; 

Whereas as a result of President Truman’s action, the United 

States Armed Forces has become one of the nation’s best examples 

of an institution committed to equality, opportunity, and advancement based on merit rather than race, religion, or ethnicity; 

and 

Whereas the heroic contributions of each member of the United 

States Armed Forces should be honored and celebrated: Now, 

therefore, be it 

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 

SECTION 1. USE OF ROTUNDA FOR CEREMONY COMMEMORATING 60TH 

ANNIVERSARY OF INTEGRATION OF THE ARMED FORCES. 

(a) USE OF ROTUNDA.—The rotunda of the Capitol is authorized 

to be used on July 23, 2008, for a ceremony commemorating the 

60th anniversary of President Truman’s Executive Order No. 9981, 

which states, ‘‘It is hereby declared to be the policy of the President 

that there shall be equality of treatment and opportunity for all 

persons in the armed services without regard to race, color, religion 

or national origin.’’. 
H. Con. Res. 377—2 

(b) PREPARATIONS.—Physical preparations for the ceremony 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be carried out in accordance 

with such conditions as the Architect of the Capitol may prescribe. 

Attest: 

Clerk of the House of Representatives. 

Attest: 

Secretary of the Senate.
No. 53813.

protest 134161-K (Pittsburgh).

#### Joseph S. Finch & Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

For the reasons stated in *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C. D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED August 22, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-51448 Summary Calendar

BILLY LANG Plaintiff - Appellant

v. DOUGLAS DRETKE, Director - CID; SMITH, Warden; MASSINGELL, Warden; O'REILLY, Warden; SLOAN, Major; BUNGER, Sergeant; UNKNOWN A; UNKNOWN B; UNKNOWN C Defendants - Appellees
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 6:04-CV-214
Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Billy Lang, Texas prisoner # 613800, proceeding pro se, filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Douglas Dretke, Director of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice

- Criminal Institutions Division (TDCJ-CID), and other corrections officials and offic

ers of the Alfred Hughes Unit. Lang alleged that the defendants failed to abate a known risk of violence and failed to provide himNo. 05-51448

2 with adequate medical attention for injuries from an assault. The district court dismissed the suit as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e), finding that Lang had failed to exhaust his prison administrative remedies, as required by 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a), with respect to inadequate-medical-treatment claim and that Lang had failed to allege more than a de mini mis injury, as required by § 1997e(e), for civil actions alleging mental or emotional injury. A district court may dismiss a complaint as frivolous “‘where it lacks an arguable basis either in lawor in fact.’” D enton v. Hernandez, 504 U.S. 25, 31-33 (1992) (quoting Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U .S. 319, 325 (1989)). Because the district court dismissed as frivolous for fai ling to state a claim pursuant to § 1997e(e), this court should review the dismissal de novo. SeeGeiger v. Jowers, 404 F.3d 371, 373 (5th Cir. 2005). With respect to exhaustion, the district court’s determination that Lang failed toexhaust his administrative remedies was premature because exhaustion is an af firmative defense that must be raised by the defendant. See Jones v. Bock, 1 27 S. Ct. 910, 921 (2007). With respect to the failure-to-protect claim, Lang’s pleadings were sufficient to allege conditions of incarceration that posed
a substantial risk of serious harm to whi ch prison officials were deliberately indifferent. See Nealsv. Norwood, 59 F.3d 530, 533 (5th Cir. 1995). The district court’sjudgment is VACATED and the case is REMANDED to the district court for further proceedings. We do not consider Lang’s assertion that it is wrong for prison officials to collect filing fees from his prisoner account because it was not raised below. See Leverette v. Louisville Ladder Co. , 183 F.3d 339, 342 (5th Cir. 1999).
February 19, 1942

No. 46976.

Suit 4367

(Amended judgment).

#### *United States*v. *Nichols Copper Co.*

C. D. 453. C. A. D. 190.
---

Summary of Guaranty Contract of Maximum Amount ( the Contract) Entered into by and
between BAK International Limited (the Guarantor) and Shenzhen Hi-Tech District Branch,
Industrial Bank CO. Ltd (the
Creditor) on December 26, 2010

Main contents:

- Guaranty Contract number: Xingyinshen Gaoxinqu Shouxin (baozheng)zi(2010)013;
- BAK International Limited undertakes to assume joint and several liabilities for
- Shenzhen BAK Battery Co., Ltd (the Obligor)s indebtedness towards Industrial Bank under the Comprehensive Credit Facility Agreement of Maximum Amount (reference no.: Xingyinshen Gaoxinqu Shouxinzi (2010)013) from December 26, 2010
to December 26, 2011, and the maximum amount secured is RMB 62.5 million.
- Guaranty Responsibility: The
guaranty under this Contract shall be guaranty with joint and several
liabilities. The guarantor is obligated to pay off the debt in the event the
obligor is unable to pay off the debt (including the creditor declares the debt
becomes mature in advance to its original expiry date due to default of the
obligor or the guarantor).
- Scope of Guaranty:The guaranty shall cover all of the loan principal, interest, penalty interest,
breach of contract compensation, damages, undertaking fee and all the expenses such as litigation cost, lawyers fee, notification cost and public notice cost etc. which is incurred to the Creditor in realizing its creditors right.
- Guaranty period: The guaranty period is from the effective date of this Contract to two years after the expiry of the term of the Credit Facility Agreement and relevant agreement entered into under the Credit Facility Agreement.

Headlines of the articles omitted:

- Termination and explanation
- Payment on demand
- Declaration and undertaking of the Guarantor
- Obligations of the Guarantor
- Instances of Breach of Contract and its Liability
- Independence of Guarantors obligations
- Continuity of Obligations
- Disputation settlement
- Validity
- Supplement articles

---
---

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Ke Marcus Cui, the Interim Chief Financial Officer of CHINA BAK BATTERY, INC. (the Company), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:

1. The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2010 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed this statement this 9th day of February, 2011.

/s/ Ke Marcus CuiKe Marcus Cui 
Interim Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to China BAK Battery, Inc. and will be retained by China BAK Battery, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The forgoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1389 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1389

 To exempt any road, highway, or bridge damaged by a natural disaster, 
 including a flood, from duplicative environmental document reviews if 
  the road, highway, or bridge is reconstructed in the same location.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                July 20 (legislative day, July 19), 2011

 Mr. Nelson of Nebraska introduced the following bill; which was read 
  twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To exempt any road, highway, or bridge damaged by a natural disaster, 
 including a flood, from duplicative environmental document reviews if 
  the road, highway, or bridge is reconstructed in the same location.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXEMPTION.

    The reconstruction process of any road, highway, or bridge that is 
in operation or under construction when damaged by a natural disaster, 
including a flood, and reconstructed in the same location shall be 
exempt from any environmental review under--
            (1) the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 
        U.S.C. 4321 et seq.);
            (2) sections 402 and 404 of the Federal Water Pollution 
        Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1342, 1344);
            (3) the National Historic Preservation Act (16 U.S.C. 470 
        et seq.);
            (4) the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (16 U.S.C. 703 et seq.);
            (5) the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (16 U.S.C. 1271 et 
        seq.);
            (6) the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (16 U.S.C. 661 
        et seq.);
            (7) the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531 et 
        seq.), except when the reconstruction occurs in designated 
        critical habitat for threatened and endangered species;
            (8) Executive Order 11990 (42 U.S.C. 4321 note; relating to 
        the protection of wetlands); and
            (9) any Federal law (including regulations) requiring no 
        net loss of wetlands.
                                 <all>
```
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

August 13, 2019

No. 04

- 19

- 00501

- CV

IN THE MATTER OF M.M.C.D.

- E.

,

From the 150th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017

- PA

- 01118 Honorable David A. C anales, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellant’s motion for substitution of counsel is granted.

_________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 13th day of August, 2019

.

___________________________________ K eith E. H ottle

, Clerk of Court
Exhibit 10.5

                                                                         Summary
                                                                         -------

Summary of Loan  Agreement by and between  Shenzhen  BAK Battery  Co.,  Ltd. and
Longgang Branch, Agricultural Bank of China dated March 24, 2005.

Main contents
>>   Contract No.: (Shenzhen Longgang) Nong Yin Jie Zi (81101200500000334)
>>   Loan Amount (RMB): 19million yuan
>>   Contract Term: 24th March 2005 ~ 24th September 2005
>>   Interest  rate:  5.22%;  repayment  principal  and interest are payable six
     months from date of agreement
>>   Purpose: Working capital
>>   Liabilities of Breach of Contract:  Breach of contract penalty;  withdrawal
     of loan,  prepayment of principal and interest before maturity,  attachment
     of assets; imposition of compound interest; lawyer's fee and travel cost in
     case of litigation due to the Company 's breach of contract etc.

Terms that have been omitted:  types of the loan; clearing of the loan interest;
condition  precedent to the drawing of the loan;  rights and  obligations of the
borrower;  rights  and  obligations  of the  lender;  prepayment  of  the  loan;
guarantee  of  the  loan;  dispute  settlement;  miscellaneous;   effectiveness;
validity; and attention.