alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2015302EN.01002301.xml

| 14.9.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 302/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.9.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 302/23

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Audiencia Provincial de Castellón (Spain) lodged on 10 July 2015 — Banco Popular Español, S.A. v Elena Lucaciu and Cristian Laurentiu Lucaciu

(Case C-349/15)

(2015/C 302/29)

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Referring court

Audiencia Provincial de Castellón

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Banco Popular Español, S.A.

Appellant:

Respondents: Elena Lucaciu and Cristian Laurentiu Lucaciu

Respondents:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Is it compatible with Articles 6(1) and 7(1) of Directive 93/13/EEC (1) to limit in time the effects of the nullity of a term declared null and void because unfair? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Is it compatible with Articles 6(1) and 7(1) of Directive 93/13/EEC (1) to limit in time the effects of the nullity of a term declared null and void because unfair?

1

| 2. | If such a limitation of the effects is held to be compatible with the EU legislation, specifically Articles 6(1) and 7(1) of Directive 93/13/EEC on unfair terms in consumer contracts, on the grounds that those concerned acted in good faith and that there is a risk of serious difficulties:






  a) | What is meant by serious difficulties justifying the limitation of the effects? |
| --- | --- | --- |

2.

If such a limitation of the effects is held to be compatible with the EU legislation, specifically Articles 6(1) and 7(1) of Directive 93/13/EEC on unfair terms in consumer contracts, on the grounds that those concerned acted in good faith and that there is a risk of serious difficulties:

a)

What is meant by serious difficulties justifying the limitation of the effects?

| b) | Must the risk of serious difficulties be duly established in the court proceedings in which it is invoked or, on the other hand, may the general assessment by the court of that risk be sufficient where there is no specific data on which to base that assessment? |
| --- | --- |

b)

Must the risk of serious difficulties be duly established in the court proceedings in which it is invoked or, on the other hand, may the general assessment by the court of that risk be sufficient where there is no specific data on which to base that assessment?

---

(1)  OJ 1993 L 25, p. 29.

1

---
No. 56647.

Suits 4728/9.

#### United States *v.*The Midwest Waste Material Co. and E. J. Keller Co., Inc., and The Midwest Waste Material Co. and E. J. Keller Co., Inc. *v.*United States.

C. D. 1382. (Appeals dismissed March 25, 1952.)
March 27, 1970

No. 76-26

#### Elve Thomas, SSG, U. S. Army v United States.

By a “Petition for Writ in the Nature of Error Coram Nobis” petitioner seeks reversal of a conviction for operating a motor vehicle while drunk. It appears the conviction arose out of his trial by summary court-martial convened at Baumholder, Germany, and resulted in a sentence to reduction from the grade of Staff-Sergeant E-6 to Sergeant E-5.

Since the petitioner’s case is not reviewable by this Court under the jurisdictional limits outlined in Article 67(b), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 867(b), he cannot obtain such review under the provisions of 28 USC § 1651(a). United States v Snyder, 18 USCMA 480, 40 CMR 192 (1969).

Accordingly, it is, by the Court, this 27th day of March, 1970,

ORDERED:

That said Petition be, and the same is hereby, dismissed.
No. 46356.

#### Protest 967824-G of W. X. Huber Co. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

At the trial two witnesses testified on behalf of the plaintiff but a careful consideration of the evidence produced failed to disclose anything sufficient to overcome the correctness of the action of the collector. In accordance therewith the protest was overruled.
#### GLAXO GROUP LIMITED and Smithkline Beecham Corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC. and Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd., Defendants-Appellants.

No. 05-1057, 05-1188, 05-1189, 05-1190.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Aug. 29, 2005.

ORDER

The parties having so agreed, it is

ORDERED that the proceeding is DISMISSED under Fed. RApp. P. 42(b).
Search Help More Search 

Options Search

EERE Information Center Distribution Transformers NOPR 

Analytical Spreadsheets

The spreadsheets below provide the NOPR findings and interactive 

tools for the Engineering Analysis, the Life-Cycle Cost Analysis, the 

National Impact Analysis, the Manufacturer Impact Analysis and 

Regulatory Impact Analysis. Instructions on how to use the LifeCycle Cost Analysis and National Impact Analysis spreadsheets can 

be found in the Technical Support Document.

Engineering Analysis

l Dry-Type Engineering Analysis Results (Excel 2.9 MB) 

l Liquid Engineering Analysis Results (Excel 4.7 MB)

Life Cycle Cost Calculations by Design Line

Design Lines 1-5 are Liquid-Immersed, Medium-Voltage 

l Design Line 1: 50kVA, Single-Phase 

° LCC Analytical Spreadsheet (Excel 8.8 MB) 

l Design Line 2: 25kVA, Single-Phase 

° LCC Analytical Spreadsheet (Excel 9.6 MB) 

l Design Line 3: 500kVA, Single-Phase 

° LCC Analytical Spreadsheet (Excel 8.5 MB) 

l Design Line 4: 150kVA, Three-Phase 

° LCC Analytical Spreadsheet (Excel 8.5 MB) 

l Design Line 5: 1500kVA, Three-Phase 

° LCC Analytical Spreadhseet (Excel 8.5 MB) 

Design Lines 9-13 are Dry-Type, Medium-Voltage, Three-Phase

l Design Line 9: 300kVA, 20-45 kV BIL 

° LCC Analytical Spreadsheet (Excel 4.9 MB) 

l Design Line 10: 1500kVA, 20-45 kV BIL 

° LCC Analytical Spreadsheet (Excel 4.9 MB) 

l Design Line 11: 300kVA, 46-95 kV BIL 

° LCC Analytical Spreadsheet (Excel 5.1 MB) 

l Design Line 12: 1500kVA, 46-95 kV BIL 

° LCC Analytical Spreadsheet (Excel 4.9 MB) 

l Design Line 13: 2000kVA, 46-95 kV BIL 

° LCC Analytical Spreadsheet (Excel 4.9 MB) 

National Impact Analysis

l National Impact Analysis Spreadsheet (Excel 7.1 MB) 

 EE-RM/STD-00-550 COMMENT 92
Manufacturer Impact Analysis

l Government Regulatory Impact Model (GRIM) (Excel 7.9 MB) 

Regulatory Impact Analysis (RIA)

l RIA Spreadsheet (Excel 7.1 MB) 

Printable 

Version

Webmaster | Security & Privacy | Building Technologies Program Home | EERE Home

U.S. Department of Energy

Content Last Updated: 08/08/2006

 EE-RM/STD-00-550 COMMENT 92
EXHIBIT 32.2

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF

PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In
connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of SonoSite, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2007, I, Michael J. Schuh, Chief Financial Officer of SonoSite, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) such Annual Report on Form 10-K of SonoSite, Inc. for
the year ended December 31, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K of SonoSite, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2007, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of SonoSite, Inc.



/s/    MICHAEL J. SCHUHMichael J. Schuh Vice President-Finance, Chief
Financial Officer and Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer)


March 14, 2008
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1369 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1369

To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to exempt the conduct 
     of silvicultural activities from national pollutant discharge 
              elimination system permitting requirements.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 14, 2011

     Mr. Crapo (for himself, Mr. Wyden, Mr. Risch, and Mr. Begich) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
               Committee on Environment and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to exempt the conduct 
     of silvicultural activities from national pollutant discharge 
              elimination system permitting requirements.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Silviculture Regulatory Consistency 
Act''.

SEC. 2. SILVICULTURAL ACTIVITIES.

    Section 402(l) of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 
U.S.C. 1342(l)) is amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``(3) Silvicultural activities.--
                    ``(A) NPDES permit requirements for silvicultural 
                activities.--The Administrator shall neither require a 
                permit under this section, nor directly or indirectly 
                require any State to require a permit under this 
                section, for a discharge resulting from the conduct of 
                any silvicultural activity, such as nursery operations, 
                site preparation, reforestation and subsequent cultural 
                treatment, thinning, prescribed burning, pest and fire 
                control, harvesting operations, surface drainage, or 
                road use, construction, and maintenance, from which 
                there is runoff.
                    ``(B) Permits for dredged or fill material.--
                Nothing in this paragraph exempts the conduct of a 
                silvicultural activity resulting in the discharge of 
                dredged or fill material from any permitting 
                requirement under section 404.''.
                                 <all>
```
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Labor-Management Cooperation: Recent Efforts and Results: Readings From the Monthly Labor Review

              																																																			United States. Labor-Management Services Administration					 and 	United States. Bureau of Labor Statistics.								*Labor-Management Cooperation: Recent Efforts and Results: Readings From the Monthly Labor Review : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 2153*.															Washington, D.C: 										U.S. Dept. of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, 												December 1982,												https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/5217,				accessed on September 25, 2024.										    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 88 (Tuesday, May 8, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 26199]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-8719]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Wage & Investment Reducing Taxpayer Burden 
(Notices) Issue Committee of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Wage & Investment Reducing Taxpayer 
Burden (Notices) Issue Committee of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be 
conducted (via teleconference). The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is 
soliciting public comments, ideas and suggestions on improving customer 
service at the Internal Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Thursday, June 7, 2007 from 1 p.m. ET.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sallie Chavez at 1-888-912-1227, or 
954-423-7979.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that an open meeting of the Wage & Investment Reducing Taxpayer Burden 
(Notices) Issue Committee of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held 
Thursday, June 7, 2007 from 1 p.m. ET via a telephone conference call. 
If you would like to have the TAP consider a written statement, please 
call 1-888-912-1227 or 954-423-7979, or write Sallie Chavez, TAP 
Office, 1000 South Pine Island Road, Suite 340, Plantation, FL 33324. 
Due to limited conference lines, notification of intent to participate 
in the telephone conference call meeting must be made with Sallie 
Chavez. Ms. Chavez can be reached at 1-888-912-1227 or 954-423-7979, or 
post comments to the Web site: http://www.improveirs.org.
    The agenda will include: Various IRS issues.

    Dated: April 7, 2007.
John Fay,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
 [FR Doc. E7-8719 Filed 5-7-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. Sec.1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of O2Diesel Corporation (the Company)
on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the Report),
I, Alan Rae, Chief Executive Officer of the Company and I, David Koontz, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best
of my knowledge that:  (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(2)The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company. Date: May 17, 2004 By:
    
    /s/ Alan Rae
    
    By:
    
    /s/ David KoontzName: Alan Rae
Title: Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
    
    
    
    Name: David Koontz
Title: Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
 This certificate is being made for the exclusive purpose of compliance by the
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company with the
requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and may not be
disclosed, distributed or used by any person or for any reason other than as
specifically required by law. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to O2Diesel Corporation and will be retained by O2Diesel Corporation
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                             500
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   500
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     958
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           504
<OTHER-SE>                                         996
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       958
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   542
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (542)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (542)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
From: Jerry Wamsley/R9/USEPA/US

To: eschrepf@npca.org

Cc: Jeanhee Hong/R9/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 04/14/2011 04:05 PM Subject: Fw: Request for extension of comm ent period in EPA-R09-OAR-2011-0131

Hello Ms. Schrepf,

Per my earlier message, I am forwarding Ms. Hong's email and our attached response to your April 5 request to extend the comment period on our propos ed action regarding the California Regional Haze Plan and the 2007 Transport SIP.

Sincerely, Jerry Wamsley

-----Forwarded by Jerry Wamsley/ R9/USEPA/US on 04/14/20 11 03:52PM ----- To: eschrepf@npca.org From: Jeanhee Hong/R9/USEPA/US

Date: 04/08/2011 11:58AM Cc: Jerry Wamsley/R9/USEPA/US@EPA Subject: Request for extension of co mment period in EPA- R09-OAR-2011-0131

Dear Ms. Schrepf,

Please see attached letter in response to your Ap ril 5, 2011 request for an extension of the comment period in EPA-R09-OAR-2011-0131. Thank you.

(See attached file: npca letter.pdf) npca letter.pdf
p. 1 

# OAR Box 1828 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 207 ) ll-K - (I ) -2 0 Docket Number: 

# A-83-2 7

Printed 11/12/200811:12:55AM Sheet 207 of 325P. 2

II-K-(I)-2 0 INDUSTRIA L FUE L CHOIC E ANALYSI S MODEL . VOL . I - PRIMARYMODE L DOCUMENTATIO N AND VOL . I I - APPENDICE S T O MODE L DOCUMENTATION . EEA , Inc . Januar y 8 , 1979 . THI S INFORMATION

CA N B E FOUND I

N DOCKE T A-79-02 , ITE

M II-K-(I)-2 0
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service 

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Area 2 Committee of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be conducted (via teleconference). The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service. 

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Wednesday, June 20, 2007 at 2:30 p.m. ET. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Inez E. De Jesus at 1-888-912-1227, or 954-423-7977. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that an open meeting of the Area 2 Committee of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held Wednesday, June 20, 2007 at 2:30 p.m. ET via a telephone conference call. If you would like to have the TAP consider a written statement, please call 1-888-912-1227 or 954-423-7977, or write Inez E. De Jesus, TAP Office, 1000 South Pine Island Rd., Suite 340, Plantation, FL 33324. Due to limited conference lines, notification of intent to participate in the telephone conference call meeting must be made with Inez E. De Jesus. Ms. De Jesus can be reached at 1-888-912-1227 or 954-423-7977, or post comments to the Web site:                     *http://www.improveirs.org.*

The agenda will include the following: Various IRS issues. 

 Dated: May 7, 2007. 

 John Fay, 

Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel. 

 [FR Doc. E7-9156 Filed 5-11-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P