alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
VI 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1386 

For the relief of Hussein Bazzi. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 19, 2011 

Mr. LEVIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

For the relief of Hussein Bazzi. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a) 

5 and (b) of section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality 

6 Act (8 U.S.C. 1151), Hussein Bazzi shall be eligible for 

7 an immigrant visa or for adjustment of status to that of 

8 an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence upon 

9 filing an application for issuance of an immigrant visa 

10 under section 204 of that Act (8 U.S.C. 1154) or for ad11 justment of status to lawful permanent resident. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1386 IS

1 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Hussein Bazzi en2 ters the United States before the filing deadline set forth 

3 in subsection (c), Hussein Bazzi shall be considered to 

4 have entered and remained lawfully in the United States 

5 and shall be eligible for adjustment to lawful permanent 

6 resident status under section 245 of the Immigration and 

7 Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1255) as of the date of the en8 actment of this Act. 

9 (c) APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF FEES.—Sub10 sections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the application for 

11 issuance of an immigrant visa or for adjustment of status 

12 are filed with appropriate fees not later than 2 years after 

13 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

14 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBERS.— 

15 Upon granting immigrant visas or lawful permanent resi16 dent status to Hussein Bazzi, the Secretary of State shall 

17 instruct the proper officer to reduce by one, during the 

18 current or next following fiscal year, the total number of 

19 immigrant visas that are made available to natives of the 

20 country of birth of Hussein Bazzi under section 202(a)(2) 

21 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 

22 1152(a)(2)). 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
•

•

•

t

SPA 19

RCRA REVISION CHECKLIST 167 F

Exclusion of Recycled Wood Preserving Wastewaters

63 FR 28556-28753

May 26,1998

(RCRA Cluster VIII, non-HSWA provisions)

STATEANALOG IS:

FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS FEDERAL RCRACITATION ANALOGOUS STArn CITATION

WAC173-303- LESS MORE EQUIV- STRJN- STRJN- BROADER

AU:NT GENT GENT INSCOPE

PART 261 - IDENTIFICATION AND LISTING OF HAZARDOUS WASTE

SUBPART A-GENERAL

EXCLUSIONS

add new paragraph; 261.4(a)(9)(iii) 071(3)(w)(iii) X

prior to reuse, wood 261.4(a)(9)(iii)(A) 071(3)(w)(iii)(A) X preserving

wastewaters and spent 261.4(a)(9)(iii)(B) 071(3)(w)(iii)(B) X

wood preserving

solutions described in 261.4(a)(9)(iii)(C) 071(3)(w)(iii)(C) X

261.4(a)(9)(i)&(ii), so

261.4(a)(9)(iii)(D) 071(3)(w)(iii)(D) X long as they meet all

specified conditions 261.4(a)(9)(iii)(E) 071 (3)(w)(iii)(E) X

May 26, 1998 - Page 1 of 1 CLl67F - Revised: 11/12198

Printed: 12/19101
<SEQUENCE>3
<FILENAME>rcert312-033104.txt            Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, David Robinson, Chief Financial Officer, certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Uptowner
         Inns, Inc.;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this quarterly report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and
other financial information included in this quarterly
report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented
in this quarterly report.

         4.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a)	designed such disclosure controls and procedures
to ensure that material information relating to
the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiary is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period
in which this quarterly report is being
prepared;

b)	evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's
disclosure controls and procedures as of a date
within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c)	presented in this quarterly report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures based on our
evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;







- 1 -
<PAGE>
         5.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the
registrant's board of directors:

a)	all significant deficiencies in the design or
operation of internal controls which could
adversely affect the registrant's ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial
data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal
controls; and

b)	any fraud, whether or not material, that
involves management or other employees who have
a significant role in the registrant's internal
controls; and


6.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I have
indicated in this quarterly report whether there were
significant changes in internal controls or in other
factors that could significantly affect internal
controls subsequent to the date of our most recent
evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard
to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



	/s/ David Robinson
	Chief Financial Officer
	May 13, 2004





















- 2 -
<PAGE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

**OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner** 

**v. JOAN ORIE MELVIN,**  **Respondent :**  **: :**  **: :**  **: :**  **No. 1951 Disciplinary Docket No. 3**

**No. 65 DB 2013 Attorney Registration No.**  **35751 (Allegheny County)** 

O R D E R

PER CURIAM:

**AND NOW, this 15 th**  **day of January, 2015, there having been filed with this Court**  **by Joan Orie Melvin her verified Statement of Resigna tion dated December 9, 2014,**  **stating that she desires to resign from the Bar of the C ommonwealth of Pennsylvania in**  **accordance with the provisions of Rule 215, Pa.R.D.E., i t is**  **ORDERED that the resignation of Joan Orie Melvin is accepted; she is disbarred**  **on consent from the Bar of the Commonwealth of Pennsyl vania, retroactive to July 12,**  **2013; and she shall comply with the provisions of Rule 2 17, Pa.R.D.E. Respondent**  **shall pay costs, if any, to the Disciplinary Board pursuan t to Rule 208(g), Pa.R.D.E.**
Exhibit 32

Certification Pursuant to
Exchange Act Rule 15d-14(b) and
18 U.S.C. Section 1350

I, Gordon R. Arnold, certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, that:

i.  The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Sierra Monitor Corporation for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008  fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and;

ii. The information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Sierra Monitor Corporation and will be retained by Sierra Monitor Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Date:

November 12, 2008

By:    /s/ Gordon R. Arnold

Gordon R. Arnold

Chief Executive Officer

Chief Financial Officer
Publisher 

Albany, California


Mailing address:


PO Box 245, Berkeley CA


94701-0245


(510) 559-6300 

http://www.psw.fs.fed.us 

April 2002 

Pacific Southwest Research Station 

Forest Service


U.S. Department of Agriculture


Abstract


Verner, Jared, technical editor. 2002. Proceedings of a symposium on the Kings


River sustainable forest ecosystems project: progress and current status. 

January 26, 1998; Clovis, CA. Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-GTR-183. Albany, CA: 

Pacific Southwest Research Station, Forest Service, U.S. Department of 

Agriculture; 154 p. 

Over the past couple of decades, the challenge of crafting guidelines for 

managing public lands in the Sierra Nevada has been hampered by a lack of 

credible information on many important questions. In particular, these involve 

timber harvest; threats of increasing intensity and extent of wildfires resulting 

from the heavy accumulations of surface and ladder fuels in forests of the Sierra 

Nevada; the use of prescribed burning to reduce fuel accumulations; the potential 

of management actions to lead certain native species of wildlife toward Federal 

listing as threatened or endangered; and the growing impacts of residential 

developments adjacent to public forests. The Kings River Sustainable Forest 

Ecosystem Project is a joint undertaking of the Sierra National Forest, the Pacific 

Southwest Region of the USDA Forest Service, and the Pacific Southwest 

Research Station to study the impacts of timber harvest and prescribed fire on 

many components and processes of conifer forests in a 64,000-acre study area on 

the Kings River District of the Sierra National Forest. The project was initiated in 

1994 and is intended to continue for many years—even decades. This document, 

therefore, reports only the initial efforts of this project. On the management side, 

papers included here present methods and results of landscape-level planning, 

timber harvest, prescribed burning, historic fire intervals, and riparian 

assessments. Reports from research involve the effects of timber harvest and 

prescribed burning on forest ecosystem processes, soils, hypogeous fungi, 

spotted owls, songbirds, small mammals, and fishers. 

Retrieval Terms: fisher, forest management, hypogeous fungi, prescribed 

burning, riparian resources, Sierra Nevada, small mammals, soils, songbirds, 

spotted owl. 

Technical Editor


Jared Verner, Chief Research Wildlife Biologist and Senior Scientist, retired,


Pacific Southwest Research Station, USDA Forest Service, 2081 E. Sierra Ave.,


Fresno, CA 93710. 

English-to-metric conversions:


1 inch = 2.540 centimeters


1 foot = 0.305 meter


1 square foot = 0.093 square meter


1 acre = 0.405 hectare


1 mile = 1.609 kilometers


1 square mile = 2.590 square kilometers


1 ounce = 28.350 grams


1 pound = 0.454 kilogram


1 quart = 0.946 liter


Metric-to-English conversions: 

1 centimeter = 0.394 inch 

1 meter = 3.281 feet 

1 square meter = 10.764 square feet 

1 hectare = 2.471 acres 

1 kilometer = 0.621 mile 

1 square kilometer = 0.386 square mile 

1 gram = 0.035 ounce 

1 kilogram = 2.205 pounds 

1 liter = 1.057 quarts
_________________________________________ 

 

Order Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

September 23, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 127660 Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

JOYCE MCDOWELL, as Personal Stephen J. Markman,

Representative of the estates of BLAKE Justices 

BROWN, JOYCE BROWN, and

CHRISTOPHER BROWN, deceased, and

as Conservator for JONATHON FISH,

JOANNE CAMPBELL, and JUANITA FISH, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 127660 

 COA: 246294 
 Wayne CC: 00-039668-NO

CITY OF DETROIT and the DETROIT 

HOUSING COMMISSION, 

Defendants-Appellants. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 9, 2004 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), we 

direct the Clerk to schedule oral argument on whether to grant the application or take 

other peremptory action permitted by MCR 7.302(G)(1). The parties shall include among 

the issues to be addressed at oral argument whether the Court of Appeals erred in holding 

that negligent nuisance is an exception to governmental immunity under Hadfield v 

Oakland County Drain Commissioner, 430 Mich 139 (1988), and whether, if a fire begins 

in the space between an inner and outer wall of leased premises, the fire "trespasses" to 

the tenant's premises when it spreads beyond the inner wall. The parties may file 

supplemental briefs within 28 days of the date of this order, but they should avoid 

submitting mere restatement of arguments in application papers. 

d0919 

I, CORBIN R. DAVIS, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 23, 2005
 

Clerk
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 286 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 6, 2008 

Received and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of Congress that Earl Lloyd should 

be recognized and honored for breaking the color barrier 

and becoming the first African-American to play in the 

National Basketball Association League 58 years ago. 

Whereas Earl Lloyd was born in Alexandria, Virginia on 

April 3, 1928; 

Whereas Earl Lloyd first developed his passion for basketball 

at the city of Alexandria’s segregated Parker-Gray High 

School; 

Whereas Earl Lloyd was drafted by the NBA in 1950 as a 

ninth round pick by the Washington Capitols; 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

HCON 286 RFS 

Whereas on October 31, 1950, Earl Lloyd became the first 

African-American to play in the NBA; 

Whereas Earl Lloyd dissolved the color barrier in the NBA 

3 years after Jackie Robinson had done the same in baseball; 

Whereas Earl Lloyd proudly put his professional career on 

hold and served in the Army for 2 years before returning 

to the NBA; 

Whereas Earl Lloyd played 560 NBA games and won a 

championship before retiring in 1960; 

Whereas in 2003, Earl Lloyd was inducted into the Naismith 

Memorial Basketball Hall of Fame; and 

Whereas the newly constructed basketball court at T.C. Williams in his home town of Alexandria was named in his 

honor: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that Earl 

3 Lloyd should be recognized and honored for breaking the 

4 color barrier and becoming the first African-American to 

5 play in the National Basketball Association League 58 

6 years ago. 

Passed the House of Representatives March 5, 

2008. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Picatinny : the first century[electronic resource].
 
PDF| EPUB|
 
SuDoc Number: D101.2:P 58
Item Number:0325 (online)
CGP systemNumber: 001082412 
October 23, 2018**
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 29, 2020

No. 04-19-00808-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF K.E.R., K.R.R., Q.A.R., AND M.C., CHILDREN

From the 37th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018-PA-00816

Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellee has filed a motion for an extension of time to file a brief. We grant the motion 

and order appellee’s brief filed by February 10, 2020. This is an accelerated appeal of an order 

in a suit for termination of the parent-child relationship that must be disposed of by this court 

within 180 days of the date the notice of appeal was filed in the trial court. See Tex. R. Jud. 

Admin. 6.2. Because of the time constraints governing the disposition of this appeal, further 

requests for extensions of time will be disfavored.

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 29th day of January, 2020.

___________________________________

Michael A. Cruz,

Clerk of Court
(Reap. Dec. 8435)

Entry No. 966897, etc.

#### R. J. Saunders & Co., Inc. *v.*United States

(Decided May 10, 1955)

*Jordan & Klingaman*for the plaintiff.

*Warren E. Burger,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Wilson, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule “A,” hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> It is hereby stipulated and agreed between counsel, subject to the approval of the court, that on or about the dates of exportation of the merchandise covered by the appeals listed herein said merchandise was freely offered for sale for home consumption to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country of exporta*499tion in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade at the invoice units of value plus 14 per cent plus 1.01 per cent plus packing, and that there was no higher export value therefor.

> It is further stipulated and agreed that the appeals may be submitted.

On the agreed facts I find the foreign value, as that value is defined in section 402 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by section 8 of the Customs Administrative Act of 1938, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values were the invoice units of value, plus 14 per centum, plus 1.01 per centum, plus packing.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
#### Quin Wan ZHUANG, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 04-73820.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 12, 2005.*

Decided Sept. 19, 2005.

*865Daniel K.Y. Fong, Law Offices of Daniel K.Y.Long, Monterey Park, CA for Petitioner.

Regional Counsel, Western Region Immigration & Naturalization Service, Laguna Niguel, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Legal Officer, Office of the District Counsel, San Francisco, CA, Office of Immigration Lit., DOJ—U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: REINHARDT, RYMER, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Quin Wan Zhuang, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) affirmance of an Immigration Judge’s denial of his applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence, *see Rostomian v. INS,*210 F.3d 1088, 1089 (9th Cir.2000), and we grant the petition.

Substantial evidence does not support the BIA’s finding that the abuse petitioner suffered did not constitute past persecution on account of religion. Because petitioner was arrested, detained for fifteen days, and beaten twice for holding a Christian religious service in his home, and this conduct rises to the level of persecution, substantial evidence does not support the BIA’s denial of asylum. *See Guo v. Ashcroft,*361 F.3d 1194, 1203 (9th Cir.2004) (finding past persecution where alien, a Christian from China, was detained for fifteen days and beaten twice).

Accordingly, we conclude that petitioner established past persecution, giving rise to a rebuttable presumption of a well-founded fear of persecution. *See Tawadrus v. Ashcroft,*364 F.3d 1099, 1103 (9th Cir.2004). We grant the petition for review and remand to the BIA to give the Attorney General an opportunity to rebut this presumption and for the BIA to consider whether petitioner qualifies for relief. *See INS v. Ventura,*537 U.S. 12, 123 S.Ct. 353, 154 L.Ed.2d 272 (2002) (per curiam); *Lopez v. Ashcroft,*366 F.3d 799, 805-07 (9th Cir.2004).

Petitioner failed to raise his withholding of removal and CAT claims in his opening brief, so those claims are waived. *See Martinez-Serrano v. INS,*94 F.3d 1256, 1259 (9th Cir.1996).

PETITION FOR REVIEW GRANTED; REMANDED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
# C_2015414EN.01004302.xml

| 14.12.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 414/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.12.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 414/43

---

Action brought on 30 September 2015 — ZZ and ZZ v Commission

(Case F-128/15)

(2015/C 414/55)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicants: ZZ and ZZ (represented by: J.-N. Louis and N. de Montigny, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

The annulment of either the proposal for the calculation, or the final calculation, of the number of years of pensionable service granted in the European Union pension scheme and corresponding to the applicants’ pension rights, acquired under national schemes, which they wish to transfer into the European Union pension scheme, pursuant to the new general implementing provisions for Article 11(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicants claim that the Tribunal should:

| — | annul the decisions of 30 April 2015, of 1 July 2015 and of 6 July 2015 fixing the amount credited to the Community pension scheme in respect of the applicants’ pension rights acquired prior to their entry into service at the Commission; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decisions of 30 April 2015, of 1 July 2015 and of 6 July 2015 fixing the amount credited to the Community pension scheme in respect of the applicants’ pension rights acquired prior to their entry into service at the Commission;

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs.

---