alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FROM: Elizabeth Counter
             23350 Water Circle
             Boca Raton, Florida 33486

TO:       Robert Tyson / ICC President
             Suite 804 - 750 West Pender St.
             Vancouver, B.C., Canada V6C 2T8

                            CONSULTING AGREEMENT
                                  BETWEEN
                         INTERGRATED CARBONICS CORP.
                                    AND
                              ELIZABETH COUNTER

This consulting agreement (the "Agreement") is made and entered
into this day the 19th of July 1999 by and between Integrated
Carbonics Corp. ("ICCN") and Elizabeth Counter, a media relations
consultant and publisher.

Whereas, ICCN desires to retain Ms. Counter to provide certain
consulting and media relations services for the benefit of ICCN.

Whereas, ICCN desires to retain the services of Ms. Counter as an
independent consultant and Ms. Counter desires to be retained in
the capacity upon the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth,
the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the
parties hereto agree as follows:

1.  Ms. Counter will provide specialized consulting services in
the area of media relations.

2.  The term of the Agreement shall be for a period of six
months, commencing upon execution hereof, and is irrevocable.

3.  Compensation:  In full consideration of the services to be
provided for ICCN by Ms. Counter, Ms. Counter shall receive the
following: 66,500 free trading shares and 100,000 shares of
common stock to be provided by ICCN under Rule 144 of the
Securities Act of 1933.

4.  Nature of Relationship.  It is understood and acknowledged
by the parties that Ms. Counter is being retained by ICCN in an
independent capacity and that Ms. Counter is not authorized to
enter into any agreement or incur any obligation on behalf of
ICCN.  In consideration of the confidential nature of the
business contemplated herein ICCN and Elizabeth Counter agree not
to disclose or otherwise reveal to any third party any
information pertaining to ICCN.

In Witness Whereof, the parties hereto have duly executed and
delivered this agreement as of the day and year first above
written.

                                    Integrated Carbonics Corp.


                                    By :  /s/  Robert S. Tyson
                                    Robert S. Tyson, Secretary


                                    Elizabeth Counter


                                    /s/  Elizabeth Counter
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 14 (Tuesday, January 23, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 2920]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-896]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration <greek-i>10784]


Kansas Disaster <greek-i>KS-00015

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major 
disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Kansas (FEMA-1675-
DR) , dated 01/07/2007.
    Incident: Severe Winter Storm.
    Incident Period: 12/28/2006 through 12/31/2006.
    Effective Date: 01/07/2007.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 03/08/2007.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing And Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth , TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the President's major disaster declaration on 01/07/2007, Private Non-
Profit organizations that provide essential services of a governmental 
nature may file disaster loan applications at the address listed above 
or other locally announced locations.
    The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected 
by the disaster:

Primary Counties:
    Cheyenne, Clark, Comanche, Decatur, Edwards, Ellis, Finney, Ford, 
Gove, Graham, Grant, Gray, Greeley, Hamilton, Haskell, Hodgeman, 
Jewell, Kearny, Kiowa, Lane, Logan, Meade, Morton, Ness, Norton, 
Osborne, Pawnee, Phillips, Rawlins, Rooks, Rush, Russell, Scott, 
Seward, Sheridan, Sherman, Smith, Stafford, Stanton, Stevens, Thomas, 
Trego, Wallace, Wichita

    The Interest Rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                 Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Other (Including Non-Profit Organizations) With Credit             5.250
 Available Elsewhere..........................................
Businesses And Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit             4.000
 Available Elsewhere..........................................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 10784.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

James E. Rivera,
Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. E7-896 Filed 1-22-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
Exhibit 32.1


                            Certification Pursuant to
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350
                             as Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report  of China  BAK  Battery,  Inc.  (the
"Company")  on Form  10-QSB/A  for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with
the  Securities  Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report").  I, Li
Xiangqian,  Chief  Executive  Officer of the  Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted  pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.

By: /s/ Li Xiangqian
   ---------------------------
   Li Xiangqian
   Chief Executive Officer
   February 2, 2006
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

September 26, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

130934 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 130934 

 COA: 263912 

Wayne CC: 91-003903-01 

FLOYD JENNINGS,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 16, 2006 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). 

s0918 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 26, 2006 

 Clerk
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER



I, Harry E. Gruber, M.D., President and Chief Executive Officer of Kintera, Inc. (the Registrant), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, based on my knowledge:



(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of
the Registrant, to which this certification is attached as an exhibit (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



Dated: March
16, 2005



|                                                                                         
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Harry E. Gruber, M.D.                                                                
|Harry E. Gruber, M.D. President and Chief Executive
Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
Exhibit 32

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of Coventry Health Care, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 

| (1) |   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| (2) |   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

Date: February 27, 2009

 

| By: /s/ Allen F. Wise                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|  

Allen F. Wise

 

Chief Executive Officer and Director

 

 

 

 

 

By: /s/ Shawn M. Guertin

 

 

Shawn M. Guertin

 

Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

  |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                        <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              3-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997             MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997             SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          71,966                  71,966
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,599,115               1,599,115
<ALLOWANCES>                                    50,000                  50,000
<INVENTORY>                                  2,496,969               2,496,969
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,378,100               4,378,100
<PP&E>                                       2,753,848               2,753,848
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,073,027               1,073,027
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,680,732               8,680,732
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,149,237               2,149,237
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                        32,456                  32,456
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,199,432               5,199,432
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,680,732               8,680,732
<SALES>                                      3,295,498               6,653,275
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,295,498               6,653,275
<CGS>                                        2,671,666               5,381,462
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,671,666               5,381,462
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               610,586               1,185,050
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              75,194                 146,882
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 22,440                  39,411
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             22,440                  39,411
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                    22,440                  39,411
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .01                     .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01                     .01
        

</TABLE>
Case No. 8,112.

#### LATHROP v. STEWART.

[6 McLean, 630.] 1

Circuit Court, S. D. Ohio.

Oct. Term, 1855.

Evidence — Production of Record — Evidence under Plea of Fraud — Bankrupt Proceeding-Entitled to Notice.

1. Where a record is introduced' collaterally as evidence, from a court of general jurisdiction, and where, from the face of the record, it appeared the court had jurisdiction, no evidence will be heard, to contradict the record.

2. A plea of fraud, generally, is not sufficient to admit of evidence in a bankrupt case, where the bankrupt had been engaged in an extensive commercial business.

3. The bankrupt, in such a case, is entitled to notice of the acts which are alleged to be fraudulent.

[This was an action at law by Sylvanus Lathrop against William Stewart. The court overruled a demurrer to a plea of discharge in bankruptcy. Case No. 8,113. The plaintiff then replied that the bankruptcy court had no jurisdiction. The ease is now first heard upon issue joined on this replication.]

Mr. Peck, for plaintiff.

Mr. Pox, for defendant.

1

 [Reported by Hon. John McLean, Circuit Justice.]

OPINION OF

THE COURT.

This action is founded upon four bills of exchange, one for five thousand dollars, payable to plaintiff and accepted by defendant; a second for two thousand dollars, drawn by defendant on Shannon, indorsed by Church, Lathrop and Stockton; a third drawn by defendant and indorsed as above; and a fourth drawn and indorsed as the third bill. The defendant pleaded a discharge under the bankrupt law. The plaintiff replied, that the court had no jurisdiction, as the bankrupt was neither a citizen or resident at Mobile, in Alabama, where the discharge was obtained. Issue joined on the replication.

THE COURT held that under this issue, parol evidence could not be received to contradict the record. The bankrupt court had general jurisdiction in bankruptcy. On the face of the record, the court appears to have had jurisdiction of the case; and as the record is introduced collaterally, it could not be impeached. Evidence was then offered to show the accounts of the bankrupt, and his general dealing with his creditors. But THE. COURT held that in this case a general plea of fraud was insufficient. That the specific acts which are alleged to be fraudulent must be stated, to give notice to the bankrupt, that he may be prepared to meet them. That without such notice, in a case so complicated as a bankruptcy must be, where the bankrupt had been engaged in a large commercial business, he could not be expected to be prepared to meet the fraud, unless reasonable notice of the facts relied upon to show it, were given.

The Counsel for the defendant admitted, that the ground on which he principally relied to show fraud, involved the jurisdiction of the court. The court, in order to admit the plea to be filed, discharged the jury and gave leave to the plaintiff to amend his pleadings. But as amended pleadings were not filed, at the close of the term, the court entered a judgment of nonsuit, with leave for the defendant, at the ensuing regular term, to move to set it aside.
**Summary      of Loan Agreement by and between Shenzhen BAK Battery Co., Ltd. and Eastern      Branch, Agricultural Bank of China dated June 22,      2007.**

**Summary      of the main articles **

| Ø | Contract                number: NO.81101200700001153 |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------|

| Ø | Loan                Principal: RMB 60 million; |
|--------|------------------------------------------------|

| Ø | Loan                term: from June 22, 2007 to June 22,                2008 |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Ø | Interest                rate: annually 6.57%, payable on the 20th                of                each month; |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Ø | Purpose                of the loan is to provide working capital for the Company; |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Ø | Advanced                repayment of loan needs to be approved by the Lender; |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Ø | Breach                of contract penalties: suspension of loan un-provided, demand prepayment                of loan principal and interest before maturity; imposition of punitive                interest; compensation for the Lender’s expenses incurred due to the                Company’s breach of contract such as lawyer’s fee, travel cost in case of                litigation, etc. |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

**Summary      of the articles omitted **

| Ø | Types                of the loan |
|--------|----------------------------------|

| Ø | Clearing                of the loan interest |
|--------|----------------------------------------------|

| Ø | Condition                precedent to the drawing of the loan |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------|

| Ø | Rights                and obligations of the borrower |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------|

| Ø | Rights                and obligations of the lender |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------|

| Ø | Guarantee                of the loan |
|--------|--------------------------------------|

| Ø | Dispute                settlement |
|--------|-----------------------------------|

| Ø | Miscellaneous |
|--------|---------------|

| Ø | Validity |
|--------|----------|

| Ø | Notes |
|--------|-------|
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**Certification of Principal Financial Officerrequired by Rule 13a – 14(a) or15d-14(a) of the Exchange Act**

 

I, Pam Strunk, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of AES Red Oak,LLC;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered byreport;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and  have:

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is beingprepared;

 

b) [Reserved]

 

c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal controls over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information and;

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.

 

 
| Date:  November 14, 2003 | /s/ Pam Strunk                      |   |
|------------------------------------|-------------------------------------|--------|
|                               | Pam Strunk  Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-41290

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ELISA SOTELO MACIAS, also known as Elias Sotelo Patino

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:07-CR-91-7

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Elisa Sotelo Macias has moved for

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,

386 U.S. 738 (1967). Macias has not filed a response. Our independent review

of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is

excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

February 18, 2009

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
Order issued January~, 2013

In The

 ourt of App 

of at

No. 05-12-01003-CR

CHRISTOPHER ROY MARSHALL, Appellant

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 195th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. FII-26457-N

ORDER

The Court GRANTS appellant’s December 19, 2012 motion to accept brief tendered.

We ORDER the Clerk of the Court to file the brief tendered as of the date of this order.