alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 311 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 311

 Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the Greater Washington 
                            Soap Box Derby.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 6, 2008

  Mr. Hoyer (for himself, Mr. Moran of Virginia, Mr. Van Hollen, Mr. 
  Wynn, Ms. Norton, and Mr. Wolf) submitted the following concurrent 
 resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and 
                             Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
 Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the Greater Washington 
                            Soap Box Derby.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF SOAP BOX DERBY RACES ON CAPITOL GROUNDS.

    The Greater Washington Soap Box Derby Association (in this 
resolution referred to as the ``Association'') shall be permitted to 
sponsor a public event, soap box derby races, on the Capitol Grounds on 
June 21, 2008, or on such other date as the Speaker of the House of 
Representatives and the Committee on Rules and Administration of the 
Senate may jointly designate.

SEC. 2. CONDITIONS.

    The event to be carried out under this resolution shall be free of 
admission charge to the public and arranged not to interfere with the 
needs of Congress, under conditions to be prescribed by the Architect 
of the Capitol and the Capitol Police Board; except that the 
Association shall assume full responsibility for all expenses and 
liabilities incident to all activities associated with the event.

SEC. 3. STRUCTURES AND EQUIPMENT.

    For the purposes of this resolution, the Association is authorized 
to erect upon the Capitol Grounds, subject to the approval of the 
Architect of the Capitol, such stage, sound amplification devices, and 
other related structures and equipment as may be required for the event 
to be carried out under this resolution.

SEC. 4. ADDITIONAL ARRANGEMENTS.

    The Architect of the Capitol and the Capitol Police Board are 
authorized to make any such additional arrangements that may be 
required to carry out the event under this resolution.

SEC. 5. ENFORCEMENT OF RESTRICTIONS.

    The Capitol Police Board shall provide for enforcement of the 
restrictions contained in section 5104(c) of title 40, United States 
Code, concerning sales, advertisements, displays, and solicitations on 
the Capitol Grounds, as well as other restrictions applicable to the 
Capitol Grounds, with respect to the event to be carried out under this 
resolution.
                                 <all>
```
Beacon 520FC, Beacon 520FCX

Com plex strontium aluminate, rare earth doped
### Surface water supply of the United States, 1932, Part I, North Atlantic slope basins

By: Water Resources Division, U.S. Geological Survey

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp726

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 308 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 308

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. USE OF CAPITOL GROUNDS FOR NATIONAL PEACE OFFICERS' MEMORIAL 
              SERVICE.

    (a) In General.--The Grand Lodge of the Fraternal Order of Police 
and its auxiliary (in this resolution referred to as the ``sponsor'') 
shall be permitted to

              

 sponsor a public event, the 27th annual National Peace Officers' 
Memorial Service (in this resolution referred to as the ``event''), on 
the Capitol Grounds, in order to honor the law enforcement officers who 
died in the line of duty during 2007.
    (b) Date of Event.--The event shall be held on May 15, 2008, or on 
such other date as the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the 
Committee on Rules and Administration of the Senate jointly designate.

SEC. 2. TERMS AND CONDITIONS.

    (a) In General.--Under conditions to be prescribed by the Architect 
of the Capitol and the Capitol Police Board, the event shall be--
            (1) free of admission charge and open to the public; and
            (2) arranged not to interfere with the needs of Congress.
    (b) Expenses and Liabilities.--The sponsor shall assume full 
responsibility for all expenses and liabilities incident to all 
activities associated with the event.

SEC. 3. EVENT PREPARATIONS.

    Subject to the approval of the Architect of the Capitol, the 
sponsor is authorized to erect upon the Capitol Grounds such stage, 
sound amplification devices, and other related structures and 
equipment, as may be required for the event.

SEC. 4. ENFORCEMENT OF RESTRICTIONS.

    The Capitol Police Board shall provide for enforcement of the 
restrictions contained in section 5104(c) of title 40, United States 
Code, concerning sales, advertisements, displays, and solicitations on 
the Capitol Grounds, as well as other restrictions applicable to the 
Capitol Grounds, in connection with the event.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 1, 2008.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
110th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                            H. CON. RES. 308

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

   Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the National Peace 
                      Officers' Memorial Service.
```
EXHIBIT 23

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

US LEC CORP.

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
333-78075 and Registration Statement No. 333-61617 of US LEC Corp. and
subsidiaries on Form S-8 of our report dated February 29, 2000, which report
includes an emphasis of a matter paragraph as to a significant portion of the
Company's accounts receivable and revenues relating to reciprocal compensation
which is currently in dispute; included in and incorporated by reference in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K of US LEC Corp. and subsidiaries for the year ended
December 31, 1999.




DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Charlotte, North Carolina
March 30, 2000
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                          SUBSIDIARIES  OF  U.S.  AGGREGATES,  INC.
                          -----------------------------------------

COMPANY                                        JURISDICTION OF INCORPORATION    INTEREST
-------                                        -----------------------------    --------

<S>                                            <C>                              <C>
SRM HOLDINGS CORP.                             DELAWARE                         100% OWNED SUBSIDIARY

WESTERN AGGREGATES HOLDING CORP.               DELAWARE                         100% OWNED SUBSIDIARY

SOUTHERN READY MIX, INC.                       ALABAMA                          100% OWNED SUBSIDIARY

WESTERN ROCK PRODUCTS CORPORATION              UTAH                             100% OWNED SUBSIDIARY

COX ROCK PRODUCTS, INC.                        UTAH                             100% OWNED SUBSIDIARY

COX TRANSPORT CORPORATION                      UTAH                             100% OWNED SUBSIDIARY

JENSEN CONSTRUCTION & DEVELOPMENT, INC.        NEVADA                           100% OWNED SUBSIDIARY

SANDIA CONSTRUCTION, INC.                      NEVADA                           100% OWNED SUBSIDIARY

MOHAVE CONCRETE AND MATERIALS, INC. (NEVADA)   NEVADA                           100% OWNED SUBSIDIARY

MOHAVE CONCRETE AND MATERIALS, INC. (ARIZONA)  ARIZONA                          100% OWNED SUBSIDIARY

A-BLOCK COMPANY, INC. (ARIZONA)                ARIZONA                          100% OWNED SUBSIDIARY

A-BLOCK COMPANY, INC. (CALIFORNIA)             CALIFORNIA                       100% OWNED SUBSIDIARY

VALLEY ASPHALT, INC.                           UTAH                             100% OWNED SUBSIDIARY

DEKALB STONE, INC.                             GEORGIA                          70.6667% OF THE COMMON STOCK
                                                                                AND 100% OF THE REFERRED STOCK

MULBERRY ROCK CORPORATION                      GEORGIA                          100% OWNED SUBSIDIARY

BHY READY MIX, INC.                            TENNESSEE                        100% OWNED SUBSIDIARY

BRADLEY STONE & SAND, INC.                     TENNESSEE                        100% OWNED SUBSIDIARY

TRI-STATE TESTING LABORATORIES, INC.           UTAH                             100% OWNED SUBSIDIARY

GEODYNE BECK ROCK PRODUCTS, INC.               UTAH                             100% OWNED SUBSIDIARY

MONROC, INC.                                   DELAWARE                         100% OWNED SUBSIDIARY

WESTERN AGGREGATES, INC.                       UTAH                             100% OWNED SUBSIDIARY

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 14 (Tuesday, January 23, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 2899]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-881]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[FEMA-1659-DR]


New Mexico; Amendment No. 5 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of New Mexico (FEMA-1659-DR), dated August 30, 2006, and 
related determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: January 11, 2007.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Magda Ruiz, Recovery Division, Federal 
Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2705.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of New Mexico is hereby amended to include the following 
area among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by 
the catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his 
declaration of August 30, 2006:

    The Navajo Nation within San Juan County for Public Assistance.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community 
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund Program; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services Program; 97.034, 
Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management 
Assistance; 97.048, Individuals and Households Housing; 97.049, 
Individuals and Households Disaster Housing Operations; 97.050, 
Individuals and Households Program--Other Needs; 97.036, Public 
Assistance Grants; 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.)

R. David Paulison,
Under Secretary for Federal Emergency Management and Director of FEMA.
 [FR Doc. E7-881 Filed 1-22-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-10-P
# C_2015294EN.01003401.xml

| 7.9.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 294/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.9.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 294/34

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sø- og Handelsretten (Denmark) lodged on 18 June 2015 — Ferring Lægemidler A/S, acting on behalf of Ferring B.V. v Orifarm A/S

(Case C-297/15)

(2015/C 294/42)

Language of the case: Danish

Referring court

Referring court

Sø- og Handelsretten

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Ferring Lægemidler A/S, acting on behalf of Ferring B.V.

Applicant:

Defendant: Orifarm A/S

Defendant:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Must Article 7(2) of Directive 2008/95/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2008 to approximate the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks and the related case-law be interpreted as meaning that a trade mark proprietor may lawfully object to the continued marketing of a medicinal product by a parallel importer, where the importer has repackaged the medicinal product in a new, outer packaging and reaffixed the trade mark in a situation where the trade mark proprietor has marketed the medicinal product in the same volume and packet sizes in all EEA countries where the medicinal product is sold? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Must Article 7(2) of Directive 2008/95/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2008 to approximate the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks and the related case-law be interpreted as meaning that a trade mark proprietor may lawfully object to the continued marketing of a medicinal product by a parallel importer, where the importer has repackaged the medicinal product in a new, outer packaging and reaffixed the trade mark in a situation where the trade mark proprietor has marketed the medicinal product in the same volume and packet sizes in all EEA countries where the medicinal product is sold?

1

| 2. | Will the answer to the first question be different if the trade mark proprietor in both the country of export and the country of import has marketed the medicinal product in two different packet sizes (10-piece packets and 1-piece packets) and the importer has purchased 10-piece packets in the country of export and repackaged them in 1-piece packets, on which the trade mark has been reaffixed before the products are marketed in the country of import? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Will the answer to the first question be different if the trade mark proprietor in both the country of export and the country of import has marketed the medicinal product in two different packet sizes (10-piece packets and 1-piece packets) and the importer has purchased 10-piece packets in the country of export and repackaged them in 1-piece packets, on which the trade mark has been reaffixed before the products are marketed in the country of import?

---

(1)  OJ 2008 L 299, p. 25.

1

---
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ROBERT LEE JENKINS,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

TED BLOOM; S. CAMPAIGNE; K.

THOMPSON; D. CHAMBERLAIN,

Corrections Captain; K. HOFFMAN,

Defendants

- Appellees. No. 19

- 17416

D.C. No. 3:19

- cv

- 05762

- WHA

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of California

William Alsup, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 15, 2022 * *

Before: SILVERMAN, WATFORD, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner Robert Lee Jenkins appeals pro se from the district

court’s judgment dismissi ng his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging First Amendment

violations

. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

JUN 24 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 19

- 17416

district court’s dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A

. Resnick v. Hayes , 213 F.3d

443, 447 (9th Cir. 2000). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Jenkins’s action because Jenkins failed

to allege facts sufficient to state a plausible claim. See Hebbe v. Pliler , 627 F.3d

338, 341

- 42 (9th Cir. 2010) (although pro se pleadings are construed liberally, a

plaintiff must allege facts sufficient to state a plausible claim); Rhodes v. Robinson

,

408 F.3d 559, 567

- 68 (9th Cir. 2005) (elements of a First Amendment retaliation

claim in the prison context); see also Gonzalez v. Planned Parenthood of L.A

., 759

F.3d 1112, 1115 (9th Cir. 2014) (although the court accepts as true factual

allegations in a complaint , it need not accept as true allegations that contradict

matters incorporated by reference ).

AFFIRMED.
Water Quality Standards Regulatory Revisions Rulemaking

MEMORANDUM TO RECORD SUBJECT: Meeting with National Tribal Water Council DATE: Wednesday, November 6, 2013 TIME: 8:00 – 9:00 AM Participants: EPA –Shari Barash, Janita Aguirre National Tribal Water Council Representatives – Roll-call not taken. Input received from: Ken Norton, Alex Cabillo, Nancy Schuldt, Dave Fuller. Summary of Meeting: EPA provided an overview of the proposed rule and received input from participants.
#### MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH, INCORPORATED, Plaintiff, v. HARPER FAMILY TRUST; et al., Defendants—Appellees, Jorge Glen Harper, Defendant—Appellant, Andrew James Harper, and James W. Harper, Jr., Defendants—Appellees.

No. 03-36015.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted July 13, 2005.

Decided Aug. 15, 2005.

Before: GOODWIN, BRUNETTI, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM *

In this diversity action, Jorge Glen Harper appeals the district court’s judgment in favor of Andrew James Harper (“A.J.”) on a Washington state law defamation claim as well as the district court’s award of enhanced attorneys’ fees to A.J. and James W. Harper under Alaska Rule of Civil Procedure 82. For the reasons stated by the district court, we AFFIRM.

AFFIRMED.

*

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Exhibit 35.4





LOGO

Annual Statement as to Compliance

For the Year Ended December 31, 2016

Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc.,

Series 2016-GC37

Pursuant to
Section 3.01 (32) of the Subservicing Agreement governing the referenced transaction (the Servicing Agreement), I hereby attest that:



| | i. | A review of the activities and performance of Berkadia as Subservicer during the period has been made under my supervision.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | ii. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, Berkadia as Subservicer has fulfilled, in all material respects, its obligations under this Subservicing Agreement throughout the period and no default by the
Subservicer under the Subservicing Agreement has occurred and is continuing.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Berkadia,



LOGO



|                                          
|------------------------------------------
|Mark E. McCool
President
February 10, 2017
|                                          
|Inv. 823 Lib. A
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1996
<CASH>                                          19,970
<SECURITIES>                                   776,031
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,333,505
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  2,385,327
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,522,903
<PP&E>                                       2,945,668
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,898,703
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,643,581
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,551,903
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       816,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,275,678
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,643,581
<SALES>                                      8,354,560
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             8,383,368
<CGS>                                        6,582,565
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                7,250,816
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                837,560
<INCOME-TAX>                                   326,648
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            510,912
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   510,912
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .63
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Turkey�s new regional security role:implications for the United States**
 
PDF | Mobi | ePub
 
SuDoc Number:D 101.146:T 84/3
Item Number:0307-A-31 (online)
CGP systemNumber:001081579
 
October 3, 2018
No. 46386.

#### Protest 793730-G of G. A. Westphal & Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

It was stipulated that the fur animal figures are similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstracts 30980 and 41823. The claim at 50 percent under paragraph 1519 ivas therefore sustained.
No. 42015.

#### Protest 968727-G of B. Diaz & Co. (New York).

Opinion by

McClelland, P. J.

On the record presented the protest was overruled.