alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 89 (Wednesday, May 9, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26352-26353]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-8849]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP07-417-000]

Trunkline Gas Company, LLC; Notice of Proposed Changes In FERC 
Gas Tariff

May 2, 2007.
    Take notice that on April 30, 2007, Trunkline Gas Company, LLC 
(Trunkline) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Third 
Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets, to become effective 
June 1, 2007:

Second Revised Sheet No. 6
First Revised Sheet No. 7

    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed in accordance with the provisions of 
Section 154.210 of the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 154.210). 
Anyone filing an intervention or protest must serve a copy of that 
document on the Applicant. Anyone filing an intervention or protest on 
or before the intervention or protest date need not serve motions to 
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.

[[Page 26353]]

    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
[email protected], or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E7-8849 Filed 5-8-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
```
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

RONALD E. McBRIDE, )

)

 Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D16-5075

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

 Appellee. )

___________________________________)

Opinion filed April 13, 2018.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Sarasota

County; Debra Johnes Riva, Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, 

and J. Rafael Rodríguez, Special Assistant 

Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General,

Tallahassee, and Johnny T. Salgado, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, 

for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

LaROSE, C.J., SILBERMAN and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
Exhibit 12.1
 Kansas City Southern de México, S.A. de C.V.
Schedule of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
(in millions of U.S. dollars, except ratio data)
 Nine Months
    
    
    Three MonthsYear ended
    
    
    ended
    
    
    EndedDecember 31,
    
    
    December 31
    
    
    March 31,2009
    
    
    2008
    
    
    2007
    
    
    2006
    
    
    2005
    
    
    2005Earnings:Income (loss) before income taxes
and minority interest
    
    $
    7.2
    
    
    $
    118.0
    
    
    $
    128.5
    
    
    $
    80.4
    
    
    $
    86.0
    
    
    $
    (0.5
    )Equity Method
    
    
    (2.9
    )
    
    
    (7.4
    )
    
    
    (5.7
    )
    
    
    (5.9
    )
    
    
    1.5
    
    
    
    VAT/PUT Settlement
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (141.0
    )
    
    
    Interest expenses
    
    
    106.6
    
    
    
    83.4
    
    
    
    81.9
    
    
    
    92.9
    
    
    
    70.4
    
    
    
    25.6Amortization of capitalized expense
    
    
    3.5
    
    
    
    3.2
    
    
    
    3.5
    
    
    
    3.5
    
    
    
    1.8
    
    
    
    1.6Portion of rents representative of
an appropriate interest factor (1)
    
    
    21.0
    
    
    
    21.2
    
    
    
    21.4
    
    
    
    20.9
    
    
    
    15.0
    
    
    
    4.6Income (loss) before income taxes
and minority interest Adjusted
    
    $
    135.4
    
    
    $
    218.4
    
    
    $
    229.6
    
    
    $
    191.8
    
    
    $
    33.7
    
    
    $
    31.3Fixed charges:Interest expenses
    
    
    106.6
    
    
    
    83.4
    
    
    
    81.9
    
    
    
    92.9
    
    
    
    70.4
    
    
    
    25.6Amortization of capitalized expense
    
    
    3.5
    
    
    
    3.2
    
    
    
    3.5
    
    
    
    3.5
    
    
    
    1.8
    
    
    
    1.6Capitalized interest
    
    
    
    
    
    
    0.6
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Portion of rents representative of
an appropriate interest factor (1)
    
    
    21.0
    
    
    
    21.2
    
    
    
    21.4
    
    
    
    20.9
    
    
    
    15.0
    
    
    
    4.6Total fixed charges
    
    $
    131.1
    
    
    $
    108.4
    
    
    $
    106.8
    
    
    $
    117.3
    
    
    $
    87.2
    
    
    $
    31.8Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
    
    
    1.0
    
    
    
    2.0
    
    
    
    2.1
    
    
    
    1.6
    
    
    
    N/A
    *
    
    
    1.0
 
 *
    
    For the year ended December 31, 2005 our earnings were insufficient to cover fixed charges by
$53.5 million.(1)
    
    Rents represent one-third of rents expense.
EXHIBIT 32.1
                            Certification Pursuant to
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             as Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


         In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of China BAK Battery,  Inc.
(f.k.a.  Medina  Coffee,  Inc.) (the  "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the period
ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report).  I, Li Xiangqian,  Chief Executive  Officer of the Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


By: /s/ Li Xiangqian
-----------------------
Li Xiangqian
Chief Executive Officer
June 22, 2005
### Surface water supply of the United States 1961-65: Part 6. Missouri River basin: Volume 1. Missouri River basin above Williston, North Dakota

By: Water Resources Division, U.S. Geological Survey

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1916

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

No abstract available.

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 87 (Monday, May 7, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 25756]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-8655]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-8308-9]


Great Lakes Initiative (GLI) Toxicity Data Clearinghouse

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Great Lakes Initiative Toxicity Data Clearinghouse 
(Clearinghouse) is available for use by States, Tribes, and other 
interested parties. The online Clearinghouse, developed in cooperation 
with the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) 
Headquarters, Regions 2, 3, and 5, and the Great Lakes States and 
Tribes, acts as a central location for toxicity data, exposure 
parameters, and supporting documents used in deriving water quality 
criteria and guidance values in the Great Lakes Basin.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brian Thompson, Water Quality Branch 
(WQ-16J), U.S. EPA, Region 5, Water Division, 77 West Jackson Blvd., 
Chicago, IL 60604, (312) 353-6066, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#42362a2d2f32312d2c6c20302b232c022732232f232b2e6c2732236c252d34"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="5024383f3d20233f3e7e322239313e103520313d31393c7e3520317e373f26">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information

    The Clearinghouse was developed to support implementation of the 
Final Water Quality Guidance for the Great Lakes System (GLI). Data 
from the Clearinghouse can be shared among States and Tribes to assist 
them in developing or updating numeric water quality standards and 
guidance values for the protection of aquatic life, human health, and 
wildlife. In particular, States and Tribes can use the information in 
the Clearinghouse to help derive criteria for pollutants without 
specific numeric criteria published in the GLI (40 CFR Part 132).
    Data in the Clearinghouse can be viewed online or downloaded in 
spreadsheet format. The Clearinghouse includes PDF versions of ``fact 
sheets,'' which provide methodology information on how State agencies 
and USEPA derive criteria and guidance values. The Clearinghouse also 
includes links to GLI-related documents, including Federal Register 
notices and technical support documents, as well as formulas that allow 
users to calculate criteria according to GLI methodologies. To access 
the Clearinghouse go to http://www.epa.gov/gliclearinghouse.

    Dated: April 24, 2007.
Walter W. Kovalick, Jr.,
 Acting Deputy Regional Administrator, Region 5.
[FR Doc. E7-8655 Filed 5-4-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Your right to federal records.**
 
1992 |1996| 2002 |2003 | 2004 | 2009| 2011
 
SuDoc Number:GS 1.2:F 31/2/
Item Number:0559 (online)
CGP systemNumber:001083271
 
October 19, 2018
# C_2018072EN.01003101.xml

| 26.2.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 72/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.2.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 72/31

---

Judgment of the General Court of 18 January 2018 — Kenup Foundation and Others v EIT

(Case T-76/15) (1)

1

((Technological research and development - EIT - Framework programme Horizon 2020 for research and innovation - Call for proposals with a view to the designation of a Knowledge and Innovation Community - Rejection of the applicant’s proposal - Regulation (EC) No 294/2008 - Regulation (EU) No 1290/2013 - Unlawful delegation of powers))

(2018/C 072/39)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Kenup Foundation (Kalkara, Malta) Candena GmbH (Luneburg, Germany), CO BIK Center odličnosti za biosenzoriko, instrumentacijo in procesno kontrolo (Ajdovščina, Slovenia), Evotec AG (Hamburg, Germany) (represented by: initially by: U. Soltész, C. Wagner, H. Weiß and A. Richter, and subsequently by: U. Soltész, H. Weiß and A. Richter, and finally by: U. Soltész and H. Weiß, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Institute of Innovation and Technology (EIT) (represented by: M. Kern, acting as Agent, and P. de Bandt and M. Gherghinaru, lawyers)

Defendant:

Interveners in support of the applicants: Republic of Malta (represented by: M.E. Perici Calascione, lawyer) and Stiftung Universität Lüneburg (represented by: F. Oehl, lawyer)

Interveners in support of the applicants:

Re:

Re:

Application on the basis of Article 263 TFEU, seeking the annulment of the decisions of 9 December 2014, the import of which was sent by letter of 10 December 2014, by which the EIT designated the Knowledge and Innovation Community (KIC) ‘Innovation for Healthy Living and Active Ageing’ and rejected the Kenup consortium’s proposal.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decisions of 9 December 2014, the import of which was sent by letter of 10 December 2014, by which the European Institute of Innovation and Technology designated the Knowledge and Innovation Community (KIC) ‘Innovation for Healthy Living and Active Ageing’ and rejected the Kenup consortium’s proposal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decisions of 9 December 2014, the import of which was sent by letter of 10 December 2014, by which the European Institute of Innovation and Technology designated the Knowledge and Innovation Community (KIC) ‘Innovation for Healthy Living and Active Ageing’ and rejected the Kenup consortium’s proposal;

| 2. | Orders the EIT to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Kenup Foundation, Candena GmbH, CO BIK Center odličnosti za biosenzoriko, instrumentacijo in procesno kontrolo and Evotec AG. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the EIT to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Kenup Foundation, Candena GmbH, CO BIK Center odličnosti za biosenzoriko, instrumentacijo in procesno kontrolo and Evotec AG.

---

(1)  OJ C 146, 4.5.2015.

1

---
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in theRegistration Statements (Nos. 333-89333, 333-70290, 333-44306, 333-70210, 333-85340, 333-90848 (as amended), 333-114104, 333-116279) on Form S-8 of our report dated March 25, 2009, relating to the consolidated financial statements appearing inthis Annual Report on Form 10-K of Bsquare Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2008. 

/s/    Moss Adams LLP 

Seattle, Washington 

March 25, 2009
Exhibit 13.1


    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of OJSC Rostelecom (the "Company") on Form
20-F for the period ending December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned hereby
certify that to the best of our knowledge:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) of the
     Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: June 30, 2004

                                By:        /signed/    Dmitry Ye. Yerokhin
                                   ---------------------------------------------
                                                Dmitry Ye. Yerokhin
                                       Chairman of the Management Board and
                                   General Director (Chief Executive Officer) of
                                                    Rostelecom

Date: June 30, 2004

                                By:         /signed/   Alexander A. Lutsky
                                   ---------------------------------------------
                                                Alexander A. Lutsky
                                   Chief Accountant (Chief Financial Officer) of
                                                    Rostelecom
(Reap. Dec. 9834)

#### Liebermann Waelchli & Co. N.Y., Inc., et al. *v.*United States

Entry No. 794921, etc.

(Decided November 9, 1960)

*Siegel, Handell & Davidson*for tbe plaintiffs.

*George Ooehran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for tbe defendant.

Oliver, Chief Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement enumerated in schedule “A,” hereto attached and made a part hereof, are before me for decision on a written stipulation, reading as follows:

> IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between tbe parties hereto, subject to tbe approval of tbe Court, that tbe merchandise and tbe issues in tbe Appeals to Reappraisement listed in tbe Schedule attached hereto and made a part hereof are tbe same in all material respects as tbe merchandise and tbe *549issues decided in the case of *Paramount Import Co., Inc. et al.*v. *United States,*Reap. Dec. 9697, and that the record in said case he incorporated and made a part of the record herein.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the appraised values of the merchandise covered by the Appeals to Reappraisements enumerated herein, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the Appraiser in similar cases, is equal to the market value or the price at the time of exportation of such merchandise to the United States, at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States, and that there was no higher foreign value for such or similar merchandise.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the cases may be submitted on the foregoing stipulation.

In the incorporated case, it was held that the amount paid a foreign commissionaire for services rendered in connection with the purchase of merchandise in the foreign market and which amount did not inure to the benefit of the seller was a buying commission, and, therefore, was not a part of the dutiable value of the merchandise.

On the agreed facts and following my cited decision on the law, I find that the proper basis for appraisement of the merchandise in question is export value, as defined in section 402(d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, and hold that such statutory value therefor is the appraised values, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
[LETTERHEAD]




February 21, 2000



     This  firm  audited  the  financials  statements of E/S Corporation for the
years ended December 31, 1996, 1997, and 1998 dated June 29, 1999.  I consent to
the use of my opinion on the above financial statements in the SB-1 Registration
Statement  of  E/S Corporation, Inc.  I further consent to the use of my name in
the  Prospectus  and  Registration  Statement.



                                         WILLIAM L. BUTCHER CPA, P.S.


<PAGE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
B.B. Walker's Form 10-Q for the first quarter of fiscal 1997 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000104218
<NAME> B.B. WALKER COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-01-1997
<CASH>                                               1
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,933
<ALLOWANCES>                                       873
<INVENTORY>                                     10,800
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                20,474
<PP&E>                                           8,080
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,997
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  22,756
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,171
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         83
<COMMON>                                         1,727
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,579
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    22,756
<SALES>                                          8,289
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,321
<CGS>                                            6,181
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    8,186
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     1
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    76
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 360
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (226)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (90)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (136)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (136)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.08)
        

</TABLE>