alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 2 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 2

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                June 24 (legislative day, June 23), 2008

 Received and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Expressing the sense of the Congress that children in the United States 
should understand and appreciate the contributions of individuals from 
  the territories of the United States and the contributions of such 
                 individuals in United States history.

Whereas individuals from Puerto Rico, the United States Virgin Islands, American 
        Samoa, Guam, and the Northern Mariana Islands have contributed to many 
        aspects of the history and culture of the United States, including its 
        politics, athletics, and music;
Whereas many students do not know the location or the significance of these 
        places;
Whereas the diversity of the citizens of the United States strengthens the 
        Nation, and individuals from the territories of the United States 
        contribute to that diversity; and
Whereas it is important for students to study the history of these geographic 
        areas as part of United States history: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of the Congress that children in the United States 
should understand and appreciate the contributions of individuals from 
Puerto Rico, the United States Virgin Islands, American Samoa, Guam, 
and the Northern Mariana Islands and the contributions of such 
individuals in United States history.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 23, 2008.

            Attest:

                                            LORRAINE C. MILLER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Exhibit 12.1
CERTIFICATION
I, Francisco Javier Rión, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004,of TFM, S.A. de C.V. and Grupo Transportación Ferroviaria Mexicana, S.A. de C.V.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))for the company and have:
 (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal controlover financial reporting; and
5. The company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company’s auditors and theaudit committee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the company’s internal control over financial reporting.
     Date: July 15, 2005         /s/ Francisco Javier Rión   Francisco Javier Rión   Chief Executive Officer
January 26, 1940

No. 43142.

#### Protest 979753-G of Bloomingdale Bros., Inc.

Abstract 43007. Application by plaintiff for rehearing granted.
Before the Second Division,

May 19, 1944

No. 49418.

#### Protests 874793-G, etc., of Armand Schwab & Co., Inc. (New York)

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

From the record it was found that certain of the merchandise consists of hats of ramie similar to those involved in Abstract 47291. Other items consist of hemp hats similar to those involved in *United States*v. *Armand Schwab*(30 C. C. P. A. 72, C. A. D. 218) and still others consist of hemp knotted straw hats similar to those involved in Abstract 46497. Upon the established facts and following the cited authorities certain of the items as set forth in this decision were held dutiable at only 25 percent ad valorem under paragraph 1504 (b) (1), as claimed.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C., Section 1350
      as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

                                   ----------

         In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed pursuant to
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, of
UNIFAB International, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended March 31, 2003,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, William A. Hines, the Principle Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

   1)    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

   2)    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.



/s/ William A. Hines
------------------------------------------
Name: William A. Hines
Title: Chairman of the Board and Principal
         Executive Officer
Date: August 11, 2003



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to UNIFAB International, Inc. and will be retained by UNIFAB
International, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Workmen's Compensation in the United States: A General Appraisal, Court Proceedings, Federal Legislation, Occupational Diseases, Medical Services, Accident Prevention, Problems of Administration, Rehabilitation

              																	United States. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 						*Workmen's Compensation in the United States: A General Appraisal, Court Proceedings, Federal Legislation, Occupational Diseases, Medical Services, Accident Prevention, Problems of Administration, Rehabilitation : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 1149*,												Washington: 								U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 										1954,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/4466,			accessed on September 25, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
**TRENCH ELECTRIC B.V. - FORM 20-F Equivalent**
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, Michael J. Bissell, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F Equivalent of TrenchElectric B.V.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under whichsuch statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internalcontrol over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the company and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to thecompany, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;
(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, orcaused such internal control over financial reporting to be designedunder our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding thereliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financialstatements for external purposes in accordance with generallyaccepted accounting principles;
(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;and
(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the periodcovered by the annual report that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
5. The company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the company’s auditors and the audit committee of the company’s boardof directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company’s abilityto record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the company’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.
Date: March 24, 2004     /s/ Michael J. Bissell Michael J. Bissell *Group Finance Director*
# C_2017046EN.01000802.xml

| 13.2.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 46/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.2.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 46/8

---

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 15 December 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van beroep te Antwerpen — Belgium) — Loterie Nationale — Nationale Loterij NV van publiek recht v Paul Adriaensen, Werner De Kesel, The Right Frequency VZW

(Case C-667/15) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Directive 2005/29/EC - Unfair business-to-consumer commercial practices - Misleading commercial practice - Pyramid promotional scheme - Contributions paid by new members and compensation received by existing members - Indirect financial link))

(2017/C 046/11)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Referring court

Hof van beroep te Antwerpen

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Loterie Nationale — Nationale Loterij NV van publiek recht

Applicant:

Defendants: Paul Adriaensen, Werner De Kesel, The Right Frequency VZW

Defendants:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Point 14 of Annex I to Directive 2005/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2005 concerning unfair business-to-consumer commercial practices in the internal market and amending Council Directive 84/450/EEC, Directives 97/7/EC, 98/27/EC and 2002/65/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council (‘Unfair Commercial Practices Directive’) must be interpreted as allowing a commercial practice to be classified as a ‘pyramid promotional scheme’ even if there is only an indirect link between the contributions paid by new members of the scheme and the compensation paid to existing members.

---

(1)  OJ C 106, 21.3.2016.

1

---
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 14 (Tuesday, January 23, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 2897]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-888]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[FEMA-3270-DR]


Colorado; Amendment No. 1 to Notice of an Emergency Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of an emergency declaration for 
the State of Colorado (FEMA-3270-EM), dated January 7, 2007, and 
related determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: January 12, 2007.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Magda Ruiz, Recovery Division, Federal 
Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2705.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of an emergency declaration for 
the State of Colorado is hereby amended to include the following area 
among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the 
catastrophe declared an emergency by the President in his declaration 
of January 7, 2007:

El Paso County for emergency protective measures (Category B), 
including snow removal, under the Public Assistance program for any 
continuous 48-hour period during or proximate to the incident 
period.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community 
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund Program; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services Program; 97.034, 
Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management 
Assistance; 97.048, Individuals and Households Housing; 97.049, 
Individuals and Households Disaster Housing Operations; 97.050, 
Individuals and Households Program--Other Needs; 97.036, Public 
Assistance Grants; 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.)

R. David Paulison,
Under Secretary for Federal Emergency Management, and Director of FEMA.
[FR Doc. E7-888 Filed 1-22-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-10-P
#### Hensel, Bruckmann & Lorbacher, Inc. *v.*United States

No. 6442.

Entry No. 728287, etc.

Invoices dated London, England, October 28, 1941, etc.

Certified October 28, 1941, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., December 5, 1941, etc.

(Decided October 16, 1946)

*John D. Rode*for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Hínchelos, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation ofyounsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of *377the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5.4. 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-41465 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee

v. RANDALL JAY ADDISON Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:06-CR-581-ALL
Before REAVLEY, SMITH, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Randall Jay Addison appeals the 24-month sentence imposed following his plea of guilty to transporting illegal aliens for financial gain. We affirm. He contends that he was entitled to an offense level reduction for playing a minor role in the offense. Although Addison might have played a relatively minor role in a larger conspiracy to smuggle aliens, he fails to showthat his role was minor in relation to the limited conduct oftransporting the aliens for which United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D December 14, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 06-41465

2 he was held accountable. See United State s v. Garcia, 242 F.3d 593, 598 (5th Cir. 2001); United Statesv. Buenrostro, 868 F.2d 135, 138 (5th Cir. 1989) (noting that one who merely transports contraband is not entitled to reduction). The district court did not commit clear error by refusing to reduce Addison’s offense level. Addison contends that he should have received a downward departure from the guidelines range because his criminal history was overrepresented. This court lacks authority to review the district court's refusal to depart downward from the advisory guidelines range because the decision was not based upon any erroneous belief that the district court lacked the authority to depart. See United States v. Hernandez, 457 F.3d 416, 424 n.5 (5th Cir. 2006). Addison contends that his sentence was unreasonable. Addison has not rebutted the presumption that his sentence at the low end of the advisory guidelines range was reasonable. SeeUnited Statesv. Alonzo, 435 F.3d 551, 554 (5th Cir. 2006); see also Rita v. United States, 127 S. Ct. 2456, 2462-63 (2007) The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
**Exhibit 21.1**

**INOVIOBIOMEDICAL CORPORATIONSubsidiaries**

| Subsidiary Name(1)     | ** ** | ** ** | ** ** | **Jurisdiction  of Organization** | ** ** | ** ** |
|------------------------|------------|------------|------------|-----------------------------------|------------|------------|
| Genetronics, Inc. |       | Delaware   |
| Inovio AS              |       | Norway     |
| Inovio Asia Pte. Ltd.  |       | Singapore  |

----

(1)          In accordance withInstructions (ii) to Exhibit (21) to the Exhibit Table inItem 601 of Regulation S-K, Registrant has omitted from the abovetable one of its subsidiaries because such omitted subsidiaries, considered inthe aggregate as a single subsidiary, would not constitute a significantsubsidiary of registrant as of the end of the year covered by this Report.

----
Exhibit 8.1  SUBSIDIARY
  
  COUNTRY OF INCORPORATION1.
  
  Westelcom
  
  Russian Federation2.
  
  GlobalTel
  
  Russian Federation3.
  
  Globus Telecom
  
  Russian Federation4.
  
  Zebra Telecom
  
  Russian Federation5.
  
  MTs NTT
  
  Russian Federation6.
  
  Kostars
  
  Russian Federation7.
  
  DP Pansionat Malakhit
  
  Russian Federation8.
  
  Incom
  
  Russian Federation
(Reap. Dec. 9027)

Entry No. 927712.

#### P & P Industries *v.*United States

(Decided November 27, 1957)

Plaintiff not represented by counsel.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Lawrence, Judge:

When the above-enumerated appeal for a reappraisement was called for hearing, there was no appearance on behalf of plaintiff. The court thereupon ordered the case submitted.

Rule 5 (a) of the rules of the court provides that—

> The submission for decision of any case shall be made in open court by the parties thereto or their attorneys, or by stipulation, or by written request to the court, or by the court on its own motion. Where the plaintiff, petitioner, or appellant, or his attorney, in a case does not appear when the same is called, and after the opposite party has had opportunity to present evidence on the issues, it may be deemed submitted and may be decided by the court on the record as it appears therein.

Accordingly, I have examined the record in the appeal before the court and find nothing therein which tends in any way to overcome the presumption of correctness which attaches to the decision of the appraiser. I find and hold, therefore, that the proper value of the merchandise is the value returned by the appraiser,

Judgment will b.e entered accordingly.
No. 43116.

#### Protest 992875-G of Dan Brechner & Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

The record showed that certain items consist of spring daggers similar to those the subject of Abstract 37637. The claim at 45 percent under paragraph 397 was therefore sustained.