alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1296 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1296

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To revise the boundaries of John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources 
System Sachuest Point Unit RI-04P, Easton Beach Unit RI-05P, Almy Pond 
 Unit RI-06, and Hazards Beach Unit RI-07 in the State of Rhode Island.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPLACEMENT OF JOHN H. CHAFEE COASTAL BARRIER RESOURCES 
              SYSTEM MAP.

    (a) Definition of Map.--In this section, the term ``Map'' means the 
map that--
            (1) is subtitled ``Sachuest Point Unit RI-04P, Easton Beach 
        Unit RI-05P, Almy Pond Unit RI-06, Hazards Beach Unit RI-07'';
            (2) is included in the set of maps entitled ``John H. 
        Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources System'' (referred to in 
        section 4(a) of the Coastal Barrier Resources Act (16 U.S.C. 
        3503(a)) as the set of maps entitled ``Coastal Barrier 
        Resources System''); and
            (3) relates to certain John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier 
        Resources System units in the State of Rhode Island.
    (b) Replacement.--The Map is replaced by the map entitled ``John H. 
Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources System Sachuest Point Unit RI-04P, 
Easton Beach Unit RI-05P, Almy Pond Unit RI-06, and Hazards Beach Unit 
RI-07'' and dated September 30, 2009.
    (c) Availability.--The Secretary of the Interior shall keep the 
replacement map referred to in subsection (b) on file and available for 
inspection in accordance with section 4(b) of the Coastal Barrier 
Resources Act (16 U.S.C. 3503(b)).

            Passed the Senate February 1, 2012.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
112th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 1296

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To revise the boundaries of John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources 
System Sachuest Point Unit RI-04P, Easton Beach Unit RI-05P, Almy Pond 
 Unit RI-06, and Hazards Beach Unit RI-07 in the State of Rhode Island.
```
No. 54918.

#### Acme Watch Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 132090-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

It was stipulated that the items of merchandise marked *“A”*or “B” on the invoices consist of watch movements similar in all material respects to those which were the subject of *United States*v. *Helbros Watch Co. et al.*(38 C. C. P. A. 1, C. A. D. 430). Upon the agreed statement of facts and the cited authority, the items marked “A” were held properly dutiable at the base rate of 90 cents each as watch movements more than 1 inch but less than 1.77 inches wide, and the items marked “B” were held dutiable at $1.20 *330.each as watch movements more than *%o*of 1 inch but not more than 1 inch wide •under paragraph 367 (a) (1), as modified, *supra.*
#### United States *v.*M. Kenneth Frank, Jr.

No. 6262.

Entry No. 718414, etc.

Invoices dated Havana; Cuba, November 1943.

Certified November 1943.

Entered at New York, N. Y., December 22, 1943, etc.

(Decided March 6, 1946)

*332
      *Paul P. Bao,*Assistant Attorney General *(Samuel D. Specior,*special attorney), for the plaintiff.

No appearance for the defendant.

Ekwall, Judge:

These are collector’s appeals for reappraisement filed under authority of section 501 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by section 16 (b) of the Customs Administrative Act of 1938, involving the value of importations of hard candy from Cuba. Three appeals have been consolidated. All of the merchandise was invoiced at $0.18 per pound. That involved in reappraisement 155387-A was entered and appraised at $0.14 plus tax of *2%*per centum. That covered by reappraisement 155507-A was entered at $0.14 per pound plus packing ($250), plus *2%*per centum tax on invoice value ($148.50) and appraised at $0.14 per pound packed. In reappraisement 155508-A the entered value was $0.14 per pound plus *2%*per centum tax ($38.50) and the appraised value $0.14 per pound packed.

When first called for hearing there was no appearance on the part of the defendant and the cases were submitted on the part of the Government. On motion duly filed this submission was set aside and the cases restored to the calendar. At the second hearing there was no appearance on the part of the defendant, and the Government attorney stated that he had discussed the case with the defendant who informed him that his attorney would get in touch with Government counsel, but up to the time of hearing nothing further had been heard from said defendant. Government counsel then submitted the case upon two special agents’ reports, with a statement that the collector asked that the value be found to be “18 cents a pound f. o. b. Havana, which is equal to the invoice price.”

An examination of these reports discloses that there was some question as to whether the consular invoice involved in reappraisement 155387-A met the legal requirements of the customs service. However, that question was not raised at the hearing and is not before us.

From an examination of the reports in evidence it is apparent that the proper dutiable value is $0.18 per pound, net weight, f. o. b. Havana, which represents the export value as defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, and I so find.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
(Reap. Dec. 9854)

#### The American International Products Corporation *v.*United States

Entry Nos. 19563-1/2; 879187.

*574(Decided November 29, 1960)

*John D. Bode*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Daub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Wilson, Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation entered into between counsel for the respective parties:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between counsel for the plaintiff and the Assistant Attorney General for the United States, subject to the approval of the Court, that the merchandise the subject of the above entitled appeals to reappraisement is properly dutiable on the basis of American Selling Price as defined in Section 402(g) Tariff Act of 1930 as amended and that the said American Selling Price was as follows for the export periods indicated.

> Item Period Price

> PAS Sodium_ 1959 $1.75 per lb. less *1%*net packed.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the appeals be deemed submitted for decision on this stipulation.

On the agreed facts, I find and hold American selling price, as that value is defined in section 402(g) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by section 8 of the Customs Administrative Act of 1938, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here in question, and that such value for the involved items at the time of exportation heretofore indicated was as hereinabove set forth in the stipulation of submission herein.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
No. 53820.

protests 119192-K, etc. (New York).

#### R. U. Delaphenha & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise and issues are the same in all material respects as those in *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C. D. 1155). .For the reasons stated in the cited authority, *230the first claim of the plaintiffs was sustained. It was also stipulated that the merchandise, issues, and facts herein are similar to those involved in *United States*v. *Browne Vintners Co., Inc.*(34 C. C. P. A. 112, C. A. D. 351). Following the cited authority it was held that an allowance in duties and internal revenue taxes should be made as to the merchandise respecting the quantities reported by the discharging inspectors as not landed, or as manifested, not found. The protests were sustained to the extent indicated.
### Geology and underground waters of South Dakota

By: Nelson Horatio Darton

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp227

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (4291 pdf)                        
  - **Plate 11**                            (4165 pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 91 (Friday, May 11, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26849-26850]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-9102]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-60,195]


Walter Kidde Portable Equipment, Inc.; Kidde Residential and 
Commercial Division Including On-Site Temporary Workers of Special 
Teams Power and Aerotek; Mebane, NC; Amended Certification Regarding 
Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative 
Trade Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 
2273), and Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974 (26 U.S.C. 2813), as 
amended, the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility 
to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade 
Adjustment Assistance on October 12, 2006, applicable to workers of 
Walter Kidde Portable Equipment, Inc., Kidde Residential and Commercial 
Division, Mebane, North Carolina. The notice was published in the 
Federal Register on October 25, 2006 (71 FR 62490).
    At the request of a petitioner, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers are engaged 
in the production of portable fire extinguishers.
    New information shows that a temporary worker of Aerotek was 
employed on-site at Walter Kidde Portable Equipment, Inc., Kidde 
Residential and Commercial Division, Mebane, North Carolina.
    Based on these findings, the Department is amending this 
certification to include a temporary worker of Aerotek working on-site 
at the Mebane, North Carolina location of the subject firm.
    The intent of the Department's certification is to include all 
workers employed at Walter Kidde Portable

[[Page 26850]]

Equipment, Inc., Kidde Residential and Commercial Division, Mebane, 
North Carolina who were adversely affected by a shift in production to 
Mexico.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-60,195 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    All workers of Walter Kidde Portable Equipment, Inc., Kidde 
Residential & Commercial Division, including on-site temporary 
workers of Special Team Power and Aerotek, Mebane, North Carolina, 
who became totally or partially separated from employment on or 
after October 1, 2005, through October 12, 2008, are eligible to 
apply for adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act 
of 1974, and are also eligible to apply for alternative trade 
adjustment assistance under Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 4th day of May 2007.
Richard Church,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E7-9102 Filed 5-10-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 

          - [Docket No. RP07-320-000] 

Take notice that the Commission will convene a technical conference in the referenced proceeding on Tuesday, May 8, 2007, at 10 a.m. (EDT), in a room to be designated at the offices of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. 

                    The Commission's March 30, 2007 order [1]                                          directed that a technical conference be held to address the issues raised by Colorado Interstate Gas Company's (CIG) February 28, 2007 tariff filing to reflect a quarterly adjustment to its lost and unaccounted-for (L&U) and other fuel gas reimbursement percentage.                 

Commission Staff and parties will have the opportunity to discuss all of the issues raised by CIG's filing including, but not limited to, technical, engineering and operational issues, CIG's justification and support for inclusion of the costs associated with the gas lost at the Fort Morgan storage field, and issues related to the interpretation and applicability of tariff provisions governing L&U and other fuel gas and liability for losses. 

                    FERC conferences are accessible under section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. For accessibility accommodations please send an e-mail to                     *accessibility@ferc.gov*                     or call toll free (866) 208-3372 (voice) or 202-502-8659 (TTY), or send a fax to 202-208-2106 with the required accommodations.                 

                    All interested persons are permitted to attend. For further information please contact Debbie-Anne Reese at (202) 502-8758 or e-mail                     *Debbie-Anne.Reese@ferc.gov.*

Kimberly D. Bose, 

Secretary.

# Footnotes

1.                             Colorado Interstate Gas Company, 118 FERC ¶ 61,265 (2007).                    
        Back to Citation      

 [FR Doc. E7-7805 Filed 4-24-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
<PAGE>   1


                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.16


PERSONAL & CONFIDENTIAL

May 29, 2001

Curtis M. Uehlein
Provant, Inc.
67 Batterymarch Street, Suite 500
Boston, MA 02110

Dear Curt:

      Provant, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), is pleased to
agree with you to amend the Employment Agreement dated October 8, 1999 by and
between the Company and you (the "Employment Agreement") as follows:

      1. The term of the Employment Agreement set forth in Section 2 thereof
shall be extended to, and shall expire on, May 1, 2004.

      2.    In addition, Sections 3(a) and (b) of the Employment Agreement
shall be amended as follows:

      (a)   All references to "President and Chief Operating Officer" shall be
            deleted and shall be replaced by "President and Chief Executive
            Officer"; and

      (b)   Instead of reporting to the Company's Chief Executive Officer and
            Board of Directors, you shall report solely to the Company's Board
            of Directors.

      In the event of any conflict between the Employment Agreement and this
letter agreement, this letter agreement shall control. Except as expressly
amended hereby, the Employment Agreement shall remain unmodified and in full
force and effect.

      If the foregoing meets with your approval, please so indicate by signing
both copies of this letter and returning one to us.

                                    Very truly yours,

                                    PROVANT, INC.

                                    By: /s/ Norman Fornella
                                        Norman Fornella
                                        Executive Vice President and
                                        Chief Financial Officer


Agreed to and accepted this 30th day of May 2001:

/s/ Curtis M. Uehlein
Curtis M. Uehlein
Case No. 13,985a.

#### THORN v. The VICTORIA.

[Nowhere reported; opinion not now accessible.]
Exhibit 32.1   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002    In connection with the Report of Competitive Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Carl OConnell, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.    Carl OConnell Chief Executive Officer  November 16, 2012  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Competitive Technologies and will be retained by Competitive Technologies and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qof MathStar, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended September 30,2008 (the “Quarterly Report”), I, Douglas M. Pihl, Chief Financial Officer ofthe Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 
| 1.     |   | The Quarterly Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                  |
| 2.     |   | The information contained in the Quarterly Report  fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results  of operations of the Company.      |

 
| Date:  November 7, 2008 |   | By:    |       /s/ Douglas M.  Pihl |
|-----------------------------------|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------|
|                              |   |   |   Douglas M. Pihl                              |
|                              |   |   |   Chief Financial Officer                      |

 

----
#### United States *v.*Dick & Goldschmidt, Inc.

No. 6490.

Entry No. 759163.

Invoice dated Bradford, England, April 4, 1946.

Certified April 11, 1946.

Entered at New York, N. Y., May 8, 1946.

(Decided November 6, 1946)

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the plaintiff.

*Fred Bennett*for the defendant.

Cole, Judge:

Tbis appeal for reappraisement of woven wool fabrics bas been submitted by tbe parties 'on an agreed set of facts, establishing export value as defined in section 402 (d) of tbe Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. 1940 ed. § 1402 (d)) to be tbe proper basis for appraisement for tbe wool piece goods invoiced as Quality No. 7257, and that such statutory value for the said merchandise is 8 shillings per yard, less *2%*per centum, plus packing.

As to tbe remaining items included in tbe shipment in question, tbe appeal is dismissed.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM BALANCE
SHEET AND INCOME STATEMENT
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           4,550
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   71,160
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,679
<INVENTORY>                                     10,685
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               102,167
<PP&E>                                          17,014
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,628
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 172,697
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           62,261
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            22
<OTHER-SE>                                      33,914
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   172,697
<SALES>                                        196,790
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               361,628
<CGS>                                          173,553
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  283,477
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               149,319<F1>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,459
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (77,627)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (3,827)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (73,800)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (73,800)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (3.34)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (3.34)
<FN>
<F1>Includes Restructuring Costs of $3.6 Million and Goodwill Write-off of $69.1
Million
</FN>


</TABLE>