alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(Reap. Dec. 9396)

#### Border Brokerage Co. *v.*United States

Entry No. C 05-128, etc.

(Decided April 21, 1959)

*Lawrence & Tuttle (Edward N. Glad*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*George Ooehran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General *(Murray Slclaroff,*trial attorney), for the defendant.

Wilson, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> Me. Glad : I offer to stipulate that the merchandise involved in this appeal to reappraisement consists of “gearmatie transmission parts.” I also offer to stipulate that at the time of the exportation of this merchandise there was no foreign, export, or United States value as defined by section 402 of the Tariff Act of 1930. I also offer to stipulate that the cost of production figure of this merchandise during the period of exportation was the unit invoice value less 30 percent, packing included.

> Me. Stclaeqef : Upon information obtained from Mr. Monroe, appraiser at Blaine, the Government so stipulates.

On the agreed facts, I find and hold that cost of production, as that value is defined in section 402(f) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. § 1402(f)), is the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such value is the invoice unit value, less 30 per centum, packing included.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency 

          - [FEMA-1670-DR] 

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS. 

      ( print page 2900)    

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of New York (FEMA-1670-DR), dated December 12, 2006, and related determinations. 

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

January 11, 2007. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Magda Ruiz, Recovery Division, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2705. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of New York is hereby amended to include the following area among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of December 12, 2006:  Sullivan County for Public Assistance. 

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund Program; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services Program; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance; 97.048, Individuals and Households Housing; 97.049, Individuals and Households Disaster Housing Operations; 97.050, Individuals and Households Program—Other Needs; 97.036, Public Assistance Grants; 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.)

R. David Paulison, 

Under Secretary for Federal Emergency Management and Director of FEMA.

[FR Doc. E7-880 Filed 1-22-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110-10-P
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON



### O RDER 

### W ITHDRAWING 

### M EDIATION 

### O RDER

Cause number: 01

- 17

- 00591

- CV

Style: Texas First Investment Management Co., LLP v. Thomas J. Coorsh

Date motion filed: September 14, 2017

Type of Motio n: Objection to Mediation

Party filing motion: Appellee



### It is ordered that Appellee = s objection to mediation is granted. We withdraw our

Mediation Order dated September 6, 2017.

Judge's signature: /s/ Laura C. Higley

X Acting individually Q Acting f or the Court

Panel consists of

Date: September 1 5, 2017

* Absent emergency or a statement that the motion is unopposed, must wait ten days before acting on motion except for

motion to extend time to fi le a brief. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 10.3(a).

Note : Single justice may grant or deny any request for relief properly sought by motion, except in a civil case a single justice

should not: (1) act on a petition for an extraordinary writ or (2) dismiss or otherwi se determine an appeal or a motion

for rehearing. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 10.4(a).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This Schedule Contains Summary Financial Information Extracted From The
Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements As Of September 30, 1999 And
For The Nine Months Then Ended And Is Qualified In Its Entirety by
Reference To Such Financial Statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          16,169
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  140,962
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,219,442
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,612,633
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        533,333
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           137
<OTHER-SE>                                     559,646
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,612,633
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,334,013
<CGS>                                        1,063,316
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,216,475
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              34,992
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 82,546
<INCOME-TAX>                                    30,954
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             51,592
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    51,592
<EPS-BASIC>                                       3.86
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     3.76


</TABLE>
Before the First Division,

May 10, 1944

No. 49402.

#### Protest 107828-K of Somerset Importers, Ltd. (New York).

*308Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

The collector’s letter and statement of goods remaining in warehouse on the effective date of said trade agreement were admitted in evidence without objection by the Government. Inasmuch as the record showed that the bottles in question were in warehouse on the effective date of said trade agreement, the claim at *}í*cent per pound was sustained.
Exhibit 32

                          Certification of CEO and CFO
                          ----------------------------
                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                       -----------------------------------
                       as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906
                       ----------------------------------
                        of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
                        ---------------------------------



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Urban Improvement Fund
1974, LP (the "Partnership"), for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2007 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), Paul H. Pfleger, as the equivalent of the Chief Executive Officer of
the Partnership, and John M. Orehek as the equivalent of the Chief Financial
Officer of the Partnership, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of his knowledge:

     1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Partnership.



                                     /s/Paul H. Pfleger
                                     ---------------------------------------
                                     Name:  Paul H. Pfleger



                                     /s/John M. Orehek
                                     ---------------------------------------
                                     Name:  John M. Orehek


This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Partnership for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Exhibit 12.1


                                 CERTIFICATIONS
                                 --------------


I, Reuven Ben Menachem, certify that :

1.    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Fundtech Ltd.;

2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
      of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
      were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
      report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
      information included in this report, fairly present in all material
      respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
      the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.    The company's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
      establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
      defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and
      have:

      a.    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
            disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
            supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
            company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
            us by others within those entities, particularly during the period
            in which this report is being prepared;

      b.    Evaluated the effectiveness of the company's disclosure controls and
            procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
            effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the
            end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
            and

      c.    Disclosed in this report any change in the company's internal
            control over financial reporting that occurred during the period
            covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is
            reasonably likely to materially affect, the company's internal
            control over financial reporting; and

5.    The company's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
      our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
      to the company's auditors and the audit committee of the company's board
      of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

      a.    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
            or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
            reasonably likely to adversely affect the company's ability to
            record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

      b.    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
            other employees who have a significant role in the company's
            internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  May 27, 2005


By: /s/ Reuven Ben Menachem
   --------------------------------
   Reuven Ben Menachem
   Chief Executive Officer
**EXHIBIT32.2**

** **

**Union Carbide Corporation andSubsidiaries**

 

**Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

I, Eudio Gil, VicePresident, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of Union Carbide Corporation(the “Corporation”), certify that:

 
| 1.     |   | the Quarterly Report on  Form 10-Q of the Corporation for the quarter ended September 30,  2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”)  fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or  15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                |
| 2.     |   | the information  contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the  financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.                                                                                                                                                          |

 

 
| /s/ EUDIO GIL                  |   |
|--------------------------------|--------|
| Eudio Gil                      |   |
| Vice President,  Treasurer and |   |
| Chief Financial Officer        |   |
| Date: October 28,  2008   |   |

 

29

----
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T MI C HA E L W. HU DS ON , P la in tif

f - A p p e llan t, v. T E R R Y B R IA N , C orre ct i on alO ff i ce r; R O B E R T V O L K E R , C orre ct i on alO ff i ce r, D efen d an t s - A p p el l ees. N o. 12- 15283 D. C. No . 1 : 0 8 - c v - 0 0 2 4 9 - AW I - J LT ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e E a s te rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia A nthonyW . I s hi i , D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d M ar c h 12, 2013 ** B efo re: P R E G E R S O N , R E IN H A R D T , an dW . F L E T C H E R , C i rcu i tJu d g es. M i c ha e l W . H uds on, aC a l i f orni as t a t e pr i s one r , appe a l s pr o s e f r om the di s tr i c tc ourt ’ s j udgm e ntf ol l ow i ng aj uryve r di c ti n hi s 42 U . S . C . § 1983 a c t i on



# FI LED MA R 21 2013 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS12- 15283 2 a l l e gi ng tha tde f

e nda nt s vi ol a t e d hi s F i r s tA m e ndm e ntr i ght s . W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on u n d er 2 8 U . S . C . § 1 2 9 1 . W e d i sm i ss. W e c a n n o t r e v ie w th e d is tr ic t c o u rt’s ju d g m e n t b e c au s e H u d s o n h a s f a ile dto prov i de the re l evanttri altranscr i pt s r equi re d t o revi ew the al l eged err ors. O n M ay 10, 2012, thi s c ourtde ni e d H uds on’ s r e que s tf orpr oduc t i on of

tr ans c r i pt s a tthe go vernm ent ’ s e xp ense w i tho utprej ud i ce t o renew al , ac com pani ed by a s ho w i ng as to w h ic h p o rtio n s o f

th e tr a n s c r ip t w e r e n e c e s s aryto d e c id e th e is s u e s p r e s e n te d . H u d s o n d idn o t r e n e w h is m o tio n . A c c o r d in g ly , w e ar e u n ab le to r e v ie w h is c ont e nt i ons c ha l l e ngi ng the di s tr i c tc ourt ’ s e vi de nt i aryrul i ngs a nd de ni a l of H u d s o n ’s n e w tr ia l m o tio n . See F e d . R . A p p . P . 1 0 ( b ) ( 2 ) ; Syncom Cap i talC orp. v. W ade , 9 2 4 F . 2 d1 6 7 , 1 6 9 (9 th C i r. 1 9 9 1 ) (p er cu ri am ) (d i sm i ssi n g ap p eal b y p ro se ap p e llan t f

o rf a ilu r e to p r o v id e r e le v an t tr ia l tr an s c r ip ts ) . DI S MI S S E D.
<PAGE>

                    [LETTERHEAD OF PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS]




                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
                      ----------------------------------

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-52453) of Loews Cineplex Entertainment
Corporation of our report dated April 30, 1999 relating to the financial
statements, which appears in the Annual Report to Shareholders, which is
incorporated in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.  We also consent to the
incorporation by reference of our report dated April 30, 1999 relating to the
financial statement schedules, which appears in this Form 10-K.

/s/PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
New York, New York
May 24, 1999
#### County of Beaver, Appellant *v.*The Public Service Commission.

*Public Service Company Law*— Public *Service*Commission— *Grade crossings*— Assessment *of damages*— Appeals—Jurisdiction *of commission*— Appeals *to common pleas.*

On an appeal from an award by the Public Service Commission of damages, in proceedings for the elimination of grade crossings, the grounds of - appeal, as stated in the petition were that the award was excessive and that the commission did not view the premises. The appeals referred to the amounts of the respective awards, and not to the authority of the commission to make the awards. Under such circumstances the Superior Court is not the proper tribunal to which to appeal,

*423April 28, 1925:

Under the provisions of the Public Service Company Law either party is entitled to a jury trial to determine how much, if any, damages should be paid to the parties injured in the elimination of the crossing. In such a situation the appeal from the award of the commission must be to the court of the county in which the grade crossing is situated.

Argued April 18, 1925.

Appeals, Nos. 144, 145 and 146, April T., 1925, by County of Beaver, from order of the Public Service Commission of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, in the case of County of Beaver v. Public Service Commission et al.

Before Porter, Henderson, Trexler, Keller, Linn and Gawthrop, JJ. Quashed.

Appeal from award of damages alleged to have been sustained in the elimination of a grade crossing.

The opinion of the Superior Court states the case.

The commission awarded damages to certain owners of property affected by the order of the commission and ordered the County of Beaver to pay such sum as compensation therefor. The County of Beaver appealed.

*Errors assigned*were, the amount of the damages and that the commission did not view the premises.

*Samuel B. Wilson,*County Solicitor, for appellant.

*A. G. Helbling,*for John B. Shannon and Jim Carline, interveners.

*Richgrd S. Holt,*of *Holt, Holt do Richardson, tor*William Meyer, intervener.

*Frank M. Hunter,*Counsel, and with him *John Fox Weiss,*Asst. Counsel, for the Public Service Commission.

Per Curiam,

These are separate appeals from awards of damages or compensation made by the Public Service Commis*424sion in proceedings for the elimination of a grade crossing in the County of Beaver. The grounds of appeal as stated in the petition to this court are: (1) That the awards were excessive; (2) That the commission did not view the premises. They go to the amounts of the respective awards and not to the authority of the commission to make any awards to the intervening appellees. The appellant is, under the circumstances, undoubtedly entitled to a jury trial to determine how much, if any, damages it should pay the parties injured by the construction.

The Public Service Company Law (article VI, section 17) provides that in such a situation the appeal from the award of the commission must be to the court of the proper county, that is, in this instance, to the Court of Common Pleas of Beaver County.

The appeals are quashed.
Exhibit 11

                             BNP U.S. FUNDING L.L.C.

                       Computation of net income per share
                      (in thousands, except per share data)

                                                            Twelve-month
                                                             period ended
                                                          December 31, 2000
                                                          -----------------

Net Income                                                   $   66,341
Less:  Preferred Securities Dividend Requirement
Net Income (Loss) Applicable to Common Securities                38,690
                                                                 ------
                                                             $   27,651
Securities:                                                      ======
Weighted Average Number of Common Securities                     53,011
                                                                 ======
Outstanding
Net Income (Loss) per Common Security                        $   521.61
                                                                 ======