alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.1

                             SCHOOL SPECIALTY, INC.
                       RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                             (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                          Fiscal Year (1)
                                                  --------------------------------------------------------------
                                                      2003         2002        2001         2000         1999
<S>                                                <C>          <C>         <C>          <C>          <C>
Earnings
   Income before income taxes                      $  66,037    $  36,300   $  21,006    $  33,635    $  17,615
   Plus:
      Fixed charges                                   20,840       20,052      18,941       15,003       14,084
      Amortization of capitalized interest                48           28           -            -            -
   Less interest capitalized during period                 -          240           -            -            -
                                                  --------------------------------------------------------------
                                                   $  86,925    $  56,140   $  39,947    $  48,638    $  31,699
                                                  ==============================================================

Fixed Charges
   Interest (expensed or capitalized)              $  16,042    $  15,964   $  16,393    $  12,767    $  12,267
   Portion of rent expense representative
      of interest                                      2,675        2,519       1,958        1,661        1,349
   Amortization of deferred financing fees             2,123        1,569         590          575          468
                                                  --------------------------------------------------------------
                                                   $  20,840    $  20,052   $  18,941    $  15,003    $  14,084
                                                  ==============================================================

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                       4.2          2.8         2.1          3.2          2.3
                                                  ==============================================================
</TABLE>

(1) All fiscal years presented were 52 weeks, except for fiscal 2000, which had
    53 weeks.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE>                                           5
<MULTIPLIER>                                    1,000
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                     YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-25-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-27-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-25-1998
<CASH>                                           8,217
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   21,663
<ALLOWANCES>                                       377
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                32,302
<PP&E>                                          25,026
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,668
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 138,752
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           20,422
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        95,595
<OTHER-SE>                                       6,444
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   138,752
<SALES>                                        120,424
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               120,424
<CGS>                                           69,643
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   40,884
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,353
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 695
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,495
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,081
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,377
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,377
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.28
        

</TABLE>
##### 



O2Diesel Corporation
(A Development Stage Company)
September 30, 2004 EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. Sec.1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of O2Diesel Corporation (the Company)
on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the Report),
I, Alan Rae, Chief Executive Officer of the Company and I, David Koontz, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best
of my knowledge that:  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  (2)
    
    The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company. Date: November 12, 2004 By:
    
    /s/ Alan Rae
    
    By:
    
    /s/ David KoontzName: Alan Rae
Title: Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
    
    
    
    Name: David Koontz
Title: Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
 This certificate is being made for the exclusive purpose of compliance by the
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company with the
requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and may not be
disclosed, distributed or used by any person or for any reason other than as
specifically required by law. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to O2Diesel Corporation and will be retained by O2Diesel Corporation
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
Exhibit 31.1  PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION  I, John W. Peters, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Skinovation Pharmaceutical Incorporated;  2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statement made, in light of the circumstances under which statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.  4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:  (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and  5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of small business issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):  (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.   Date: November 8, 2007/s/ John W. Peters
John W. Peters
Principal Executive Officer
Searched for **https://www.usaid.gov/**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **https://www.usaid.gov/**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of China BAK Battery, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report). I, Han Yongbin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | 1.                                                                                                                                                      | The Report   fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the   Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |                                                                                                                                                         |                                                                                                                          
| | The   information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material   respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

|By: | /s/ Han Yongbin           | 
|--- | ------------------------- | 
|    |                           | 
|    | Han Yongbin               | 
|    | Chief   Financial Officer | 
|    | May 10, 2006              | 

---
<PAGE>

                                  Exhibit 4.1

  Instruments defining the rights of holders of long-term debt of the Registrant
are not filed as exhibits because the amount of debt authorized under any such
instrument does not exceed 10% of the total assets of the Registrant and its
consolidated subsidiaries.  The Registrant hereby undertakes to furnish a copy
of any such instrument to the Commission upon request.
Newmark
Knight Frank(logo)

225 Franklin Street

18th Floor

Boston, MA 02110

T 877.526.3562

ngkf.com



Officer’s Certificate



Pursuant to the requirements of the applicable Servicing
Agreement for the transactions listed on Schedule I hereto, for which Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association,
as Master Servicer, and Berkeley Point Capital LLC d/b/a Newmark Knight Frank, as Primary Servicer, the undersigned, Ronald Steffenino,
a Senior Managing Director of Berkeley Point Capital LLC d/b/a Newmark Knight Frank, hereby certifies subject to any limitations
listed on Schedule I hereto, as of the date hereof, solely in his capacity as an officer and not in his individual capacity, as
follows:



| | 1. | A review of the activities of the Primary Servicer during the preceding calendar year (the “Reporting Period”)
and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under my supervision; and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Primary Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement
in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate
as of the 31st day of January, 2019.



Berkeley Point Capital LLC d/b/a

Newmark Knight Frank



|/s/ Ronald Steffenino | 
|--------------------- | 

Ronald Steffenino

Senior Managing Director,

Servicing and Asset Management



BPC d/b/a NKF Primary Servicer for Midland













Newmark
Knight Frank(logo)



Schedule I



Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates; Berkeley Point Capital
LLC d/b/a Newmark Knight Frank as Primary Servicer:



|COMM 2014-CCRE 17 | COMM 2014-CCRE19
|----------------- | ----------------
|GSMS 2014-GC24    | COMM 2014-UBS4  
|COMM 2015-CCRE23  | COMM 2015 CCRE27
|GSMS 2015-GC30    | GSCCRE 2015-HULA
|COMM 2015-LC19    | COMM 2015-LC21  
|CFCMT 2016-C3     | CGCMT 2016-C3   
|CFCRE 2016-C7     | CCRESG 2016 HEAT
|CCUBS 2017-C1     | CGCMT 2017-C4   
|UBS 2017-C5       | BMARK 2018 B3   
|MSCI 2018 L1      | UBS 2018 C12    
|UBS 2018 C14      | UBS 2018 C8     
|UBS 2018 C9       | MSCI 2018 H4    



BPC d/b/a NKF Primary Servicer for Midland
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1402 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1402

   To amend the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972 to increase the 
                maximum penalty for violating that Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 21, 2011

  Mr. Brown of Massachusetts introduced the following bill; which was 
  read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and 
                             Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972 to increase the 
                maximum penalty for violating that Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Marine Mammal Protection Amendment 
Act of 2011''.

SEC. 2. PENALTIES UNDER THE MARINE MAMMAL PROTECTION ACT OF 1972.

    Section 105(b) of the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972 (16 
U.S.C. 1375(b)) is amended by striking ``$20,000'' and inserting 
``$50,000''.
                                 <all>
```
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-20199 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus ENRIQUE MALDONADO ESTRADA, also known as Perico, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-00-CR-887-2

-------------------- March 29, 2001 Before DAVIS, JONES, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Enrique Maldonado Estrada appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion to revoke the magistrate judge’s pretrial detention order. The district court’s decision, which effectively adopted the reasoning of the magistrate judge, rests upon its conclusion that Estrada has not rebutted the presumption that no condition or combination of conditions will reasonably assure the safety of the community. See 18 U.S.C. § 3142(e) and (f). The district court’s conclusions are supported by theNo. 01-20199 -2- record. See United States v. Rueben , 974 F.2d 580, 586 (5th Cir. 1992). Accordingly the district court’s order is AFFIRMED.
##### 



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
EXCHANGE ACT RULE 13a-14(a)
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of BSQUARE Corporation;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely
to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.
  /s/ Brian T. Crowley

Brian T. CrowleyPresident and Chief Executive Officer
(Reap. Dec. 9031)

Entry No. 8516.

#### John A. Steer Co. v. United States

(Decided December 11, 1957)

*Brooks & Brooks*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochram, Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Lawrence, Judge:

This appeal for a reappraisement presents the question of the proper dutiable value of certain bicycles imported from Germany.

The parties hereto have stipulated and agreed that said bicycles were appraised on the basis of statutory cost of production. It was further stipulated and agreed that the cost of materials and fabrication, manipulation, and other process employed in manufacturing or producing such or similar merchandise at a time preceding the date of exportation of the involved merchandise which would ordinarily permit the manufacture or production thereof in the usual course of business, plus the usual general expenses (not less than 10 per centum of such cost) in the case of such or similar merchandise, plus the cost of all containers and coverings, and all other costs, charges, and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States, and plus an addition for profit (not less than 8 per centum of the costs of materials and fabrication or manipulation and general expenses) equal to the profit which ordinarily is added to the cost of merchandise of the same general character by manufacturers or producers in the country of manufacture who are engaged in the manufacture of merchandise of the same class or kind equals

> For items marked “A,” $16.00 each, plus packing;

> For items marked “B,” $16.75 each, plus packing;

> For items marked “C,” $17.50 each, plus packing.

Upon the agreed facts of record, I find and hold that cost of production, as that value is defined in section 402 (f) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. § 1402 (f)), is the proper basis of value for the articles in issue and that said value is as follows:

> For items marked “A,” $16.00 each, plus packing;

> For items marked “B,” $16.75 each, plus packing;

> For items marked “C,” $17.50 each, plus packing.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.