alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### Surface water supply of the United States, 1927 : Part 12, North Pacific drainage basins ; A. Pacific drainage basins in Washington and upper Columbia River basin

By: Water Resources Division, U.S. Geological Survey

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp652

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH 

	NO. 2-04-204-CV

TIMOTHY W. KINNEY	APPELLANT

	V.

JESUS MELGAREJO  	APPELLEE

	----------

	FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 3 OF TARRANT COUNTY

	----------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

	----------

	On January 10, 2005, we notified appellant that his brief had not been filed as required by rule 38.6(a).  Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a).  We stated we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless appellant or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed with the court within ten days a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal.  We have not received any response.

	Because appellant’s brief has not been filed, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.  See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b).

	Appellant shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.

								PER CURIAM 		

PANEL D:	WALKER, J.; CAYCE, C.J.; and MCCOY, J.

DELIVERED: February 17, 2005
#### F. W. Woolworth Co. *v.*United States

No. 6067.

Invoices dated Sonneberg, Germany, September 28, 1939, etc.

Certified September 29, 1939, etc.

Entered at Baltimore, Md., October 20, 1939, etc.

Entry No. 1352/2, etc.

(Decided November 8, 1944)

*Sharretts & Hillis (Edward P. Sharretts*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General *(Daniel I. Auster,*special attorney),. for the defendant.

Kincheloe, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> It is hereby stipulated, by and between counsel for the respective parties hereto,. Subject to the approval of the court, that the facts and circumstances relating to' the item of 10 per centum commission in the cases listed in the annexed schedule, identified on the invoices with “xx” in green ink and the initials CHR of Examiner Charles H. Ritz, are in all material respects the same as the facts and circumstances relating to the item of 10 per centum commission specified in the invoices relating to glass tree ornaments, novelties, and figures covered by reappraisements 113038-A, 113040-A, and 113468-A of the F. W. Woolworth Co. and passed upon by the United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals in *United States*v. *S. S. Kresge Co., B. Shackman & Co., Rice & Co., Corp., Strauss-Eckardt Co., Inc., F. W. Woolworth Co.,*26 C. C. P. A. 349, 352, wherein the court held that “A purchasing commission, charged for the handling of merchandise, is not a proper part of dutiable value.”

> It is further stipulated and agreed, that on the dates of exportation of the merchandise involved in the cases listed in the annexed schedule, identified on the invoices with “xx” in green ink and the initials CHR of Examiner Charles H. Ritz, articles such and similar thereto were freely offered for sale and sold to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country of exportation in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade for exportation to the United States at the *per se*unit invoice prices, plus 3)4 per centum social assessments for insurance, vacation, and holiday costs, plus packing, as invoiced, and that there was no higher foreign value.

> As to all other items, the appeals are abandoned.

> It is further stipulated and agreed, that the record in *United States*v. *S. S. Kresge Co. et al.,*26 C. C. P. A. 349, 352, be incorporated herein and that the said appeals to reappraisement are submitted on this stipulation.

On the agreed facts I find'the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise represented on the *400invoice by the items marked *“xx”*in green ink and the initials CHR of Examiner Charles H. Ritz, and that such values are the *per se*unit invoice prices, plus *3%*per centum social assessments for insurance, vacation, and holiday costs, plus packing, as invoiced.

The appeal having been abandoned insofar as it relates to all other merchandise, to that extent the appeal is hereby dismissed.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
No. 6260.

#### BORUM & WHITING COMPANY vs. EDWARD F. SPORL.

Syllabus.

An unliquidated claim for damages cannot be set off against a liquidated claim upon a contract, where the parties reside in the same parish and the claim for damages does not arise out of the contract sued on.

Appeal from the 'Civil District Court for the Parish of Orleans, Division “D,” No. 104,284. Honorable Porter Parker, Judge.

Thilberger & Janin, for plaintiff a“nd appellee.

*155Opinion and decree, February 1st, 1915.

Rehearing refused, March 15,1915.

L. A. Hubert, for defendant and appellant.

His Honor, JOHN ST. PAUL,

rendered tbe opinion and decree of the Court, as follows:

Briefly stated tbe case is this: Can an unliquidated

claim for damages be set off against a liquidated claim upon a. contract, where the parties reside in the same parish, and the claim for damages does not arise out of the contract sued on?

The answer is that it cannot — and the reason is that the statutory law of the State as construed by its Court of last resort has so provided.

Thus the set off cannot be claimed by way of compensation, because compensation is not allowed where the debts are not equally liquidated.

Garland’s Code of Practice, Art. 366 (A. No. 6).

Nor can it be claimed by way of reconvention, because where plaintiff and defendant reside in the same parish the reconventional demand must be necessarily connected with, or incidental to, the main demand.

Garland’s Code of Practice, Art. 375 (C.).

Judgment affirmed.
July 28, 2015

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

WENDY SCHREIBER, Appellant

NO. 14-14-00010-CV V.

STATE FARM LLOYDS, Appellee

________________________________

This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of appellee, State Farm 

Lloyds, signed September 23, 2013, was heard on the transcript of the record. We 

have inspected the record and find error in the judgment. We therefore REFORM 

the judgment of the court below to award appellee, State Farm Lloyds, a total of 

$20,195.15 in taxable court costs. This award does not include the appellate court 

costs that are assessed below. We order the judgment of the court below 

AFFIRMED except as modified in this judgment. We order appellant, Wendy 

Schreiber, to pay all costs incurred in this appeal. We further order this decision 

certified below for observance.
No. 56172.

protest 173270-K (New York).

#### Olivier Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protest.
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATION**     I, Aaron D. Cowell, Jr., certify that:     1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of US LEC Corp.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscalquarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves managementor other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.Date:March 7, 2006   By: /s/ Aaron D. Cowell, Jr.  Chief Executive Officer and President
EXHIBIT 23

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

US LEC Corp.

        We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement
No. 333-6167 of US LEC Corp. and subsidiaries on Form S-8 of our report dated
February 6, 1999 (February 26, 1999 as to Note 6), which report includes an
emphasis of a matter paragraph as to a significant portion of the Company's
accounts receivables and revenues relating to reciprocal compensation currently
in dispute; incorporated by reference in this annual Report on Form 10-K of US
LEC Corp. and subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 1998.




DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Charlotte, North Carolina
March 30, 1999
Summary of Guaranty Contract
of Maximum Amount ( the “Contract”) Entered into by and between Xiangqian Li and
Shenzhen Branch, Bank of China (the “Creditor”) on March 4th, 2009





Main
contents:


Ø GuarantyContract number:2009ZhenzhongyinsiBaoezi0034;


Ø Xiangqian Liundertakes to assume joint and several
liabilitiesforShenzhen BAKBatteryCo., Ltd (the“Obligor”)’sindebtedness towardsBankof ChinaundertheComprehensive Credit Facility
Agreementof Maximum
Amount(reference no.:2009Zhenzhongyin Exiezi000024)fromMarch4th, 2009toFebruary3rd, 2010,andthemaximum amount secured is
RMB450million.


Ø Guaranty
Responsibility:The guaranty under this
Contract shall be guaranty with joint and several
liabilities.The guarantor is obligated to pay off the
debt in the event the
obligor is unable to pay off the debt (including the creditor declares the debt
becomes mature in advance to its original expiry date due to default oftheobligor or theguarantor).


Ø Scope ofGuaranty:The guaranty shall cover all of
the loan principal,
interest, penalty interest, breach ofcontract compensation, damages,
undertaking fee and all the expenses such as litigation cost, lawyer’s fee, notification cost andpublic notice cost etc. which is
incurred to the Creditor in realizing its creditor’s right.


Ø Guaranty
period:The guaranty period is from the
effective date of this Contract to two years after the expiry of the term of theCredit Facility Agreementand relevant agreement
enteredinto under theCredit Facility
Agreement.





Headlines
of the articles omitted:


Ø
            Termination andexplanation


Ø
            Payment on
      demand


Ø
            Declaration and
      guaranty


Ø
            Independent
      guaranty


Ø
            Fulfillment oftheresponsibility and giving up oftheright


Ø
            Amendment
      of Contract


Ø
            Effectiveness
      and Disputation settlement


Ø
            Contract
      period


Ø
            Supplement
      articles
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE AUDITED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF SOLOMON ALLIANCE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES FOR THE
FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2000.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-2000
<CASH>                                          18,842
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  189,147
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     89,383
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               308,134
<PP&E>                                          70,914
<DEPRECIATION>                                  29,129
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 818,991
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,053,732
<BONDS>                                          5,834
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        22,340
<OTHER-SE>                                   (363,352)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   818,991
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               655,172
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              38,782
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (693,954)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (693,954)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (693,954)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.03)


</TABLE>
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 408 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 22 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 17), 2008 

Received 

OCTOBER 2 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 17), 2008 

Referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Recognizing North Platte, Nebraska, as ‘‘Rail Town USA’’. 

Whereas the community of North Platte, Nebraska, in western Nebraska is located at the convergence of the North 

and South Platte Rivers and possesses a rich and vibrant 

history; 

Whereas the railroad has played a significant role in the history of the community; 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
2 

HCON 408 RFS 

Whereas, on January 2, 1867, main line operations officially 

commenced in North Platte, Nebraska; 

Whereas trains were vital during our country’s war efforts, 

transporting troops, equipment, and supplies across the 

country; 

Whereas during World War II hundreds of citizens from 

North Platte, Nebraska, assembled at the local depot to 

greet troops passing through town by train and provide 

soldiers with food, coffee, and gifts; 

Whereas for 54 months between 1941 and 1946, millions of 

troops found a small bit of comfort when their trains 

stopped in North Platte, Nebraska; 

Whereas at the war’s peak 3,000 to 5,000 personnel were 

greeted daily, with North Platte, Nebraska, sometimes 

hosting up to 20 trains a day; 

Whereas Bailey Yard in North Platte, Nebraska, is the largest railroad classification yard in the world; 

Whereas Bailey Yard covers 2,850 acres, reaching a total 

length of 8 miles, and contains 315 miles of track; 

Whereas every 24 hours, Bailey Yard handles 10,000 railroad 

cars; and 

Whereas Mid-Plains Community College in North Platte, Nebraska, offers railroad-specific courses in order to enhance student preparation for possible employment in the 

railroad discipline: Now, therefore, be it 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
3 

HCON 408 RFS 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That Congress recognizes North Platte, Ne3 braska, as ‘‘Rail Town USA’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 18, 

2008. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
### The floods in central Texas in September, 1921

By: Clarence E. Ellsworth

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp488

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Heavy rainfall over a large area in south-central Texas from September 8 to September 10, 1921, produced great floods which caused the loss of at least 224 lives and damage to property amounting to more than $10,000,000. The most destructive flood in Texas prior to 1921 occurred in December, 1913. That flood, which is described on pages 46-47, caused the loss of 177 lives and destroyed property valued at more than $8,500,000.

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6515

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JAMES BERNARD LOWERY,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert D. Potter, Senior

District Judge. (CR-93-37-P, CA-99-73-P)

Submitted: June 17, 1999 Decided: June 23, 1999

Before MURNAGHAN and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Bernard Lowery, Appellant Pro Se. Brian Lee Whisler, OFFICE

OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

James Bernard Lowery appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. See United States v. Lowery, Nos. CR-93-37-P; CA99-73-P (W.D.N.C. Mar. 5, 1999). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 278 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Whereas the United States and Taiwan share common ideals 

and a clear vision for the 21st century, where freedom 

and democracy are the foundations for peace, prosperity, 

and progress; 

Whereas Taiwan has dramatically improved its record on 

human rights and routinely holds free and fair elections 

in a multiparty system, as evidenced by 
2 

•HCON 278 EH 

Taiwan’s first democratic presidential election in 1996, 

second in 2000, and third in 2004; 

Whereas the democratic and open presidential elections in 

2000 mark the first transfer of power from one party to 

another in Taiwan’s history; 

Whereas Taiwan has demonstrated its unequivocal support 

for human rights and a commitment to the democratic 

ideals of freedom of speech, freedom of the press, rule of 

law, and free and fair elections routinely held in a 

multiparty system; 

Whereas Taiwan is one of the strongest democratic allies of 

the United States in the Asia-Pacific region; 

Whereas it is United States policy to support and strengthen 

democracy around the world; 

Whereas, with its stable democratic system and impressive 

economic prowess, Taiwan stands apart from many 

equally young democracies whose freedom and liberty 

have been severely challenged; and 

Whereas the United States Congress has organized congressional delegations to witness the electoral process in 

thriving democracies, including elections in Taiwan: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that— 

3 (1) the United States Government should reaf4 firm its unwavering commitment to Taiwan’s democ5 racy and security; and 
3 

•HCON 278 EH 

1 (2) international delegations should be encour2 aged to visit Taiwan for the purpose of witnessing 

3 the presidential elections in March 2008. 

Passed the House of Representatives March 5, 

2008. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 278 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Supporting Taiwan’s fourth direct and democratic 

presidential elections in March 2008.