alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 99.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF CEO ANDCFO PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. § 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****§ 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Form 10-KSB of Unity Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report)”, Michael L. McPherson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and James D. Timmons, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his/her knowledge that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operation of the Company.

  

|   |   |   |                                                              |
|--------|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------|
|        |   |   | /s/ MICHAEL L. MCPHERSON                                          |
|   |   |   |                                                                   |
|   |   |   | **MICHAEL L. McPHERSON****Chief Executive Officer**March 27, 2003 |

  

|   |   |   |                                                                        |
|--------|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|        |   |   | /s/ JAMES D. TIMMONS                                                        |
|   |   |   |                                                                             |
|   |   |   | **JAMES D. TIMMONS****Chief Financial and Accounting Officer**March 27,2003 |

  

This certification accompanies this Reportpursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of § 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended.

-57-
Attachment 1b



### I NCOMPLETE 

### F ORMS 

### M AY 

### N OT 

### B E 

### P ROCESSED Information collection via this form is authorized by OMB Control No. 2060 - 0439 

# Registration Form for EPA’s SunWise Program Your Name: _____________________________________________________________________ How did you learn about SunWise? ___________________________________________________

____________________________________________ ____________________________________ 

## About Your Organization My organization is a: Childcare Center / Pre - K Museum Civic Group Science or Health Ed. Center Not - for - profit Health Org. University Government Other:_________________________________________ Org. Name: _____________________________________________________________________ Org. Addres s: ___________________________________________________________________ City : ___________________________________ State:__________ Zip Code: ________________ Phone: (_______)__________________________ County : ________________________________ Your E - mail : _

___________________________________________________________________ Org. Web site: ___________________________________________________________________ Mailing Address: Please send materials to: My Organization (listed above) Another Address (enter below) Alternate Address: ________________________________________________________________ City : ___________________________________ State:__________ Zip Code: ________________ Phone: (_______)____________________________ _____________________________________ Number of students you plan to teach SunWise in a y ear: _________________________________ How do you plan to use the kit (i.e., on testing day s as a fun break for students, during our solar unit, or at the beginning o f outdoor activities, during rainy day P.E. activities, etc.)? _________________

________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________ Language : English Materials OR Spanish Materials? Inkeeping with the EPA's commitment to program evaluation, are you willing to be contacted periodically

regarding SunWise? Yes No
Fidelity National Title 

Insurance Company, 

Successor /s

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 8, 2015

No. 04-14-00913-CV

David MEDRANO,

Appellant

v.

FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, Successor by Merger Lawyers 

Title Insurance Corporation, Barclays Capital Real Estate Inc. d.b.a HOMEQ, as servicing Agent 

for Duetsche Bnk. National Trust Company as Trustee,

Appellees

From the 37th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2008-CI-00027

The Honorable Richard E. Price, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Appellant David Medrano requested a partial reporter’s record, which has been filed. 

Appellees subsequently submitted a request that the court reporter prepare additional parts of the 

record at appellant’s expense. Appellant has not paid for the additional parts of the record, and 

the court reporters have asked this court to determine who is responsible for payment.

Whether appellant must bear the cost of the additions to the record depends upon whether 

appellant has filed a statement of the points or issues to be presented on appeal. The record 

before us does not contain statement of points. We order appellant to file by April 14, 2015 a 

statement of the points or issues to be presented on appeal if he intends to proceed with a partial 

reporter’s record pursuant to Rule 34.6(c) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. 

If Medrano files a statement of points or issues, then he will be limited to those issues and 

the record designated by the parties will be presumed to constitute the entire record. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 34.6(c)(1), (4); Bennett v. Cochran, 96 S.W.3d 227, 228 (Tex. 2002). In that event, 

Medrano must pay for the parts of the record requested by appellees unless they are not 

necessary to the resolution of the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 34.6(c)(3). If Medrano contends 

any of the additions requested by appellees are not necessary, he must notify this court at the 

time he files his statement of points or issues, and we will abate for a trial court determination of 

the question.
If Medrano does not file a statement of points or issues by the date ordered, this court will 

presume the omitted parts of the record support the trial court’s judgment. See Bennett, 96 

S.W.3d at 229. In that event, if appellees desire additional parts of the record be prepared and 

filed, they may direct the court reporter to prepare a supplemental record, see TEX. R. APP. P.

34.6(d), but appellees will bear the cost of paying the reporter. This court may later tax costs 

differently.

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 8th day of April, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
### Salinity of the ground water in western Pinal County, Arizona

By: Lester Ray KisterW. F. Hardt

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1819E

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 133 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 133

To repeal the provision of law that provides automatic pay adjustments 
                        for Members of Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             January 25 (legislative day, January 5), 2011

  Mrs. McCaskill (for herself, Mr. McCain, Mr. Webb, Mr. Bennet, Mrs. 
Murray, Mr. Brown of Ohio, Mr. Casey, Mr. Whitehouse, Mrs. Gillibrand, 
 Mr. Akaka, Ms. Stabenow, Mr. Rockefeller, and Mr. Tester) introduced 
the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee 
             on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To repeal the provision of law that provides automatic pay adjustments 
                        for Members of Congress.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ELIMINATION OF AUTOMATIC PAY ADJUSTMENTS FOR MEMBERS OF 
              CONGRESS.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (2) of section 601(a) of the Legislative 
Reorganization Act of 1946 (2 U.S.C. 31) is repealed.
    (b) Technical and Conforming Amendments.--Section 601(a)(1) of such 
Act is amended--
            (1) by striking ``(a)(1)'' and inserting ``(a)'';
            (2) by redesignating subparagraphs (A), (B), and (C) as 
        paragraphs (1), (2), and (3), respectively; and
            (3) by striking ``as adjusted by paragraph (2) of this 
        subsection'' and inserting ``adjusted as provided by law''.
    (c) Effective Date.--This section shall take effect on February 1, 
2013.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.2

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF 
PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER 
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In
connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of SonoSite, Inc.
for the year ended December 31, 2003, I, Michael J. Schuh, Chief Financial
Officer of SonoSite, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1)
  such Annual Report on Form 10-K of SonoSite, Inc. for the year ended December
  31, 2003, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                 
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              
| | (2)
  the information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K of SonoSite,
  Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2003, fairly presents, in all material
  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of SonoSite, Inc.

| | /S/    MICHAEL J. SCHUH                                                                      
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |                                                                                              
| | Michael J.
  Schuh                                                                           
| | Vice President-Finance, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
  (Principal Financial Officer)

March 12, 2004

67

---

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9

<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                              10,928
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                                   0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     7,650
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                         0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                              0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                              10,106
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                               114,942
<LOANS>                                            272,046
<ALLOWANCE>                                          2,600
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     427,577
<DEPOSITS>                                         374,488
<SHORT-TERM>                                           893
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                    826
<LONG-TERM>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                21
<OTHER-SE>                                          42,903
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                     427,577
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                     21,884
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                    7,804
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                       411
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                    30,099
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                  12,385
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  12,385
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                               17,714
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                         (316)
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                       0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                     16,884
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      6,799
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           6,799
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                         4,725
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         2.20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         2.20
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                        4.51
<LOANS-NON>                                          1,031
<LOANS-PAST>                                           441
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     1,472
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                          0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                     2,300
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                          122
<RECOVERIES>                                           106
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                    2,600
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 2,600
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                                  0



</TABLE>
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



### November 29, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice



### 135005 Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. 

### MOORE & CARTER LUMBER REAL Stephen J. Markman, 

### ESTATE COMPANY, Justices 

### Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 135005 COA: 267883 Sanilac CC: 04-030125-CK ARNO HASSLER AND VIRGINIA HASSLER, Defendants-Appellants.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the applicati on for leave to appeal the August 30, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented shou ld be reviewed by this Court.

s1119 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 29, 2007

Clerk
No. 53258.

#### Tavannes Watch Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 144417-K (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

The protest was dismissed.
Case No. 8,072.

#### LANNING v. CASE et al.

[4 Wash. C. C. 169.] 1

Circuit Court, Pennsylvania. 2

Oct. Term, 1821.

Evidence — Party to Suit — Hearsay — Report of Surveyor.

1. What a witness has heard two settlers say as to one having sold his right to another, is but hearsay, and cannot be given in evidence.

2. How far, and to prove what facts, the report of the surveyor under an order of court to survey and plot the land in dispute, may be given in evidence.

3. If there be two or more defendants in ejectment, and no evidence be given of the possession of one of them, the jury may find a verdict for him at the bar; and he may be examined by the other defendants.

1

 [Originally published from the MSS. of Hon. Bushrod Washington, Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States, under the supervision of Richard. Peters, Jr., Esq.]

2

 [District not given.]

[This was an action in ejectment brought by Lanning against Case and others to recover land claimed by the plaintiff under land warrants.]

In this ease it was ruled: (1) That the explanatory notes of the surveyor appointed under the order of this court to retrace and plot the lines of the land in dispute, were evidence, only so far as they related to the lines arid marks on the ground, and other matters intended to explain his own work; but not to prove the possession of any of the defendants. For all other purposes the surveyor must be examined as a witness as in ordinary cases. (2) That if there be no evidence whatever to prove possession in one of the defendants in ejectment, the jury may find a verdict in his favour at the bar; so as to authorise the other defendants to examine him as a witness.

[For other ejectment cases brought by the same plaintiff against other defendants, see Cases Nos. 8,073, 8,074, 8,076.]
EXHIBIT 21.1

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT



|    |  |                              |  |                                                             
|--- |  | ---------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------
|    |  | NAME                         |  | STATE OR OTHER JURISDICTION OF INCORPORATION OR ORGANIZATION
|1.  |  | ClassroomDirect.com, LLC     |  | Delaware                                                    
|    |  |                             
|2.  |  | Childcraft Education Corp.   |  | New York                                                    
|    |  |                             
|3.  |  | Bird-in-Hand Woodworks, Inc. |  | New Jersey                                                  
|    |  |                             
|4.  |  | Frey Scientific, Inc.        |  | Delaware                                                    
|    |  |                             
|5.  |  | Sportime, LLC                |  | Delaware                                                    
|    |  |                             
|6.  |  | Sax Arts & Crafts, Inc.      |  | Delaware                                                    
|    |  |                             
|7.  |  | Global Video, LLC            |  | Wisconsin                                                   
|    |  |                             
|8.  |  | New School, Inc.             |  | Delaware                                                    
|    |  |                             
|9.  |  | Premier Agendas, Inc.        |  | Washington                                                  
|    |  |                             
|10. |  | Premier School Agendas, Ltd. |  | Canada                                                      
|    |  |                             
|11. |  | Amalgamated Widgets, Inc.    |  | Wisconsin                                                   
|    |  |                             
|12. |  | Select Agendas, Corp.        |  | Canada                                                      
|    |  |                             
|13. |  | Califone International, Inc. |  | Delaware                                                    
|    |  |                             
|14. |  | Delta Education, LLC         |  | Delaware
Exhibit
32.1
 
 
 
 Certification
of CEO Pursuant to
 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350,
 As
Adopted Pursuant to
 Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of U.S. Energy Corp. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Keith G. Larsen Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:
 
 (1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 
 
 
 /s/
      Keith G. LarsenKeith
      G. Larsen,Chief
      Executive OfficerAugust
      8, 2008
 
 
 This
certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.
 
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
U.S. Energy Corp. and will be retained by U.S. Energy Corp. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
ALASKA SEAFOOD CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE 

EPA-HQ-OW-2013-0652

DCN: 00057CBI

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT 

CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION 

(CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.