alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
To:        Unico American Corporation                           January 10, 2000
           23251 Mulholland Drive
           Woodland Hills, CA 91364
           Attention: Erwin Cheldin, President

From:      Cary Cheldin
           23251 Mulholland Drive
           Woodland Hills, CA 91364

Re:        Amendment to Employment Agreement

Pursuant to Sections 8.1 and 8.3 of the "Employment  Agreement"  entered into on
the 27th day of November,  1996, between myself and Unico American  Corporation,
I, Cary Cheldin,  hereby agree to waive certain rights as described below. These
waivers are  retroactive  to December 1, 1996,  and shall remain  effective from
December 1, 1996,  until the expiration of the Employment  Agreement on December
1, 2001.  Nothing  contained  in the  following  waivers  shall be  construed to
require me to reimburse the company for any compensation, however defined, which
has already been paid to me.

Waivers:

1. I, Cary Cheldin,  hereby waive my right to the minimum annual salary increase
provided under Section 3.1 of the Employment  Agreement,  provided however, that
the annual salary in effect on December 31, 1999,  is not  decreased  during the
remaining term of the agreement.

2. I, Cary Cheldin,  hereby waive my right to  protection  against the company's
decision,  if any, to decrease my annual bonus, as provided under Section 3.2 of
the Employment Agreement.

By Executive:                    /s/ Cary Cheldin
                                 ----------------
                                 Cary Cheldin

Date:                            1-11-00



By Unico American Corporation:   /s/ Erwin Cheldin
                                 -----------------
                                 Erwin Cheldin

Date:                            1-11-00



By Unico American Corporation:   /s/ Roger Platten
                                 -----------------
                                 Roger Platten

Date:                            1-11-00
### Geochemical aspects of artificial recharge in the Grand Prairie region, Arkansas

By: Richard T. Sniegocki

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1615E

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
Exhibit
15.1




INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM’S CONSENT




We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-117241) pertaining to the Fundtech Ltd. 1997 Israeli Share Option
Plan for the Employees of Fundtech Ltd., the Fundtech Ltd. 1999 Employee Option
Plan, and the Fundtech Ltd. Directors’ Option Plan, of our reports dated May 27,
2010, relating to the financial statements of Fundtech Ltd. (which report
expresses an unqualified opinion), and the effectiveness of Fundtech Ltd.’s
internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on
Form 20-F of Fundtech Ltd. for the year ended December 31, 2009.





/s/
      Brightman Almagor Zohar & CoBRIGHTMAN
      ALMAGOR ZOHAR & COCertified
      Public AccountantsA
      member of Deloitte Touche TohmatsuTel-Aviv,
      IsraelOctober
      20, 2010
Before the First Division,

September 9, 1940

No. 44266.

#### Protest 941745-G of Eitinger Bead Co., Inc. (New York).

*306Opinion by

Evans, J.

The merchandise consists of colored glass drop-shaped pendants having a wire eye molded into the small end thereof. It was found that the general appearance of the article disproves the claim that it is a button and it never has been used for fastening purposes. On the record the protest was ■overruled.
No. 54924.

#### Rogers Peet Co. *v.*United States,

protest 161241-K (New York).

.Opinion by

Ford, J.

The protest was dismissed.
Before the First Division,

August 28, 1940

No. 44233.

#### Protests 520885-G, etc., of Henry Pollak, Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Brown, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is bodies, hoods, forms, or shapes similar to those the subject of *Cohn*v. *United States.*(4 Cust. Ct. 166, C. D. 314). The protests were therefore sustained.
(Reap. Dec. 9428)

#### Damrak Trading Co., Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 729573, etc.

(Decided May 20, 1959)

*Siegel, MandeTl & Davidson*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Mollison, Judge:

Counsel for the parties have submitted the appeals for reappraisement enumerated in schedule “A,” attached hereto, upon a stipulation on the basis of which I find foreign value, as defined in section 402(c), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the items involved, and that such value, in each instance, is the appraised unit value, less 2 per centum, plus cost of packing, as indicated by the appraiser.

Judgment will issue accordingly.
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 418 

Honoring the 40th Anniversary of the Project SEED Program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 17, 2008 

Ms. EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON of Texas submitted the following concurrent 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Science and Technology 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Honoring the 40th Anniversary of the Project SEED 

Program. 

Whereas Project SEED, Summer Experiences for the Economically Disadvantaged, was founded by the American 

Chemical Society to engage economically disadvantaged 

youth with scientific mentors; 

Whereas Project SEED has provided more than 8,000 high 

school students with hands on, experience-based scientific 

research in chemistry and through other related scientific 

fields; 

Whereas more than half of all participants have attributed 

Project SEED as key to their decision to attend college; 

Whereas Project SEED has provided more than 350 scholarships to high school students to continue their college 

education in the areas of national need; 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•HCON 418 IH 

Whereas Project SEED has cultivated public and private 

partnerships geared toward encouraging youth in bridging America’s competitive gap and continuing America’s 

competitive nature; 

Whereas Project SEED graduates have distinguished themselves in their fields of study and establishing themselves 

as role models in fields of chemistry, forensics, and law; 

Whereas Project SEED has encouraged the growth of traditionally underrepresented groups into fields of science 

and technology; and 

Whereas Project SEED continues to give children the opportunity to explore their potential in the sciences; Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That the Congress honors the 40th Anniver3 sary of the American Chemical Society’s Project SEED 

4 Program, an innovative program that has linked economi5 cally disadvantaged children with scientific mentors, giv6 ing them tools and encouragement to pursue their goals 

7 and make noteworthy contributions to society. 

Æ 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                           7

<MULTIPLIER>                                      1

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1998
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           98,841,064
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                          0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                            0
<EQUITIES>                                     203,550
<MORTGAGE>                                     0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                  0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 99,044,614
<CASH>                                         73,222
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                             139,887
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                         5,358,076
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 116,744,274
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                42,724,137
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                            21,431,942
<POLICY-OTHER>                                 2,064,033
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                          0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       2,855,213
<OTHER-SE>                                     44,310,199
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   116,744,274
<PREMIUMS>                                     9,383,782
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                            1,358,878
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                             0
<OTHER-INCOME>                                 1,734,884
<BENEFITS>                                     4,799,701
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                    2,629,106
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                           1,923,274
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                3,125,463
<INCOME-TAX>                                   961,753
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            2,163,710
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   2,163,710
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .35
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .34
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                 0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                            0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                              0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                             0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                               0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                        0

        


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 85 (Thursday, May 3, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 24612]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-8469]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-61,361]


Bayer Clothing Group Inc.; Target Sales Corporation; Atlanta, GA; 
Notice of Termination of Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated on April 23, 2007 in response to a petition 
filed by a company official on behalf of workers at Bayer Clothing 
Group Inc., Target Sales Corporation, Atlanta, Georgia.
    The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC this 27th day of April, 2007.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
 [FR Doc. E7-8469 Filed 5-2-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
### Evaluation of streamflow records in Rogue River basin, Oregon

By: Donald Richardson

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/cir187

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
#### Jeffrey WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Derral G. ADAMS, Defendant—Appellee.

No. 04-16798.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 1, 2005.*

Decided Aug. 5, 2005.

Jeffrey Williams, Lancaster, CA, pro se.

Kelli Marie Hammond, AGCA—Office of the California Attorney General, Department of Justice, Sacramento, CA, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, CALLAHAN, and BEA, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

California state prisoner Jeffrey Williams appeals pro se the district court’s summary judgment in favor of defendant in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging Eighth Amendment violations. We have *68jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, *Delta Sav. Bank v. United States,*265 F.3d 1017, 1021 (9th Cir.2001), and we affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment to defendant because a temporary denial of outdoor exercise during an emergency lockdown period does not rise to the level of a constitutional violation. *See Hayward v. Procunier,*629 F.2d 599, 603 (9th Cir.1980) (five month lockdown and deprivation of outdoor exercise in response to genuine emergency did not violate the Eighth Amendment).

The district court properly granted summary judgment on Williams’ claim that defendant’s decision to frost his cell window denied him natural sunlight and constituted an Eighth Amendment violation. *Cf. Hoptowit v. Spellman,*753 F.2d 779, 783 (9th Cir.1985) (inadequate lighting causing eye strain and fatigue violated Eighth Amendment).

Williams’ contention that the district court applied the wrong standard of review is without merit.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
January 8 , 2013



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

MIGUEL ANGEL PARRA M ORALES , Appellant

NO. 14

- 11

- 00685

- CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

________________________________ This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED

.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
EXHIBIT 99.1



     CERTIFICATION BY THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF
               COMPETITIVE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
                 PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
       THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

     I, John B. Nano, am President and Chief Executive
Officer of Competitive Technologies, Inc. (the Company).

     This certification is being furnished pursuant to 18
U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in connection with the filing of
the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarterly period ended April 30, 2003 (the Report).

     I hereby certify that to the best of my knowledge:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of
          Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
          1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly
          presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
          and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and
          for the periods covered by the Report.


  Date: June 6, 2003

                                /s/ John B. Nano
                                John B. Nano
                                President and Chief Executive
                                Officer of Competitive
                                Technologies, Inc.


     A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 has been provided to Competitive Technologies,
Inc. and will be retained by Competitive Technologies, Inc.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
**Shenzhen      Branch, Bank of China **

**Loan      Certificate **

| Applicant                                   |   | Shenzhen                BAK Battery Co., Ltd               |   | ID                card of the Applicant |   |       |
|---------------------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------|--------|------------|
| Currency                                    |   | RMB                                                        |   | Amount                                  |   | 50,000,000 |
| Loan                term                    |   | From                November 27, 2007 to November 27, 2008 |
| Usage                                       |   | Working                Capital                             |
| Credit                Facility Contract No. |   | (2007)                Zhen Zhongyin E Xiezi No. 000274     |
| Annual                rate                  |   | 7.29%                                                      |
| Stamp                of Applicant           |   |                                                       |   | Stamp                of Bank of China   |   |       |

----
#### Fred M. Reineman Co. (Globe Shipping Co., Inc.) et al. *v.*United States

No. 6470.

Entry No. 715359, etc.

Invoices dated London, England, September 1945, etc.

Certified September 1945, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., October 9, 1945, etc.

(Decided October 28, 1946)

*John D. Rode*for the plaintiffs.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Moixison, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importers on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
#### Hensel, Bruckmann & Lorbacher, Inc. *v.*United States

No. 7452.

Invoice dated London, England, May 9, 1946.

Certified May 14, 1946.

Entered at New York, N. Y., June 3, 1946.

Entry No. 764886.

(Decided November 24, 1947)

*John D. Rode*for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Presiding Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2022 ND 192

Robert Williamson, Petitioner and Appellant

v.

State of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee

No. 20220186

Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial 

District, the Honorable James S. Hill, Judge.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

Per Curiam.

Scott O. Diamond, Fargo, ND, for petitioner and appellant; submitted on brief.

Julie A. Lawyer, State’s Attorney, Bismarck, ND, for respondent and appellee; 

submitted on brief.

FILED 

IN THE OFFICE OF THE 

CLERK OF SUPREME COURT 

NOVEMBER 10, 2022 

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
1

Williamson v. State

No. 20220186

Per Curiam.

[¶1] Robert Williamson appeals from an order denying his application for 

post-conviction relief. Williamson argues the district court erred by dismissing 

his application, on its own motion, after the State filed an answer. We conclude 

the district court erred by denying Williamson’s application because the 

procedure required under N.D.C.C. § 29-32.1-09 for summary disposition in 

post-conviction relief cases was not followed. See Chase v. State, 2021 ND 206, 

¶¶ 8-11, 966 N.W.2d 557 (holding a motion for summary disposition in postconviction relief proceedings must be made consistent with the rules for motion 

practice and the district court may not order summary disposition in response 

to a request in a pleading); State v. Vogt, 2019 ND 236, ¶ 8, 933 N.W.2d 916 

(stating the district court may only summarily dismiss an application for postconviction relief on its own motion under N.D.C.C. § 29-32.1-09(1) before the 

State responds, and after the State responds there must be a motion by either 

party under N.D.C.C. § 29-32.1-09(3) for the court to grant summary 

disposition). We summarily reverse under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(b) and remand 

for further proceedings. 

[¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J.

Gerald W. VandeWalle

Daniel J. Crothers

Lisa Fair McEvers

Jerod E. Tufte
|   | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company      for the periods reflected therein. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| February      16, 2010 | /s/ Harvey B. Grossblatt     |
|------------------------|------------------------------|
|                   | Harvey      B. Grossblatt    |
|                   | Chief      Executive Officer |
|                   |                         |
|                   | /s/ James B. Huff            |
|                   | James      B. Huff           |
|                   | Chief      Financial Officer |

----