alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32.1






Certification






Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


(Subsections
(a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63


of Title
18, United States Code)




Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.  1350),
the undersigned officer of SonomaWest Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation
(the "Company"), does hereby certify that:




The
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2008 (the "Form
10-Q") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.






Dated:
February 13, 2009






/s/
Walker R.
Stapleton


Walker R.
Stapleton, President,


Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer








A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
SonomaWest Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by SonomaWest Holdings, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
#### United States *v.*Geo. Wm. Rueff & Co., Inc., a/c J. T. Lloyd Co.

No. 8052.

Entered at New Orleans, La.

Entry No. 2973.

(Decided September 19, 1951)

*David N. Edelstein,*Assistant Attorney General *(Joseph E. Weil,*special attorney) , for the plaintiff.

*Tompkins & Tompkins (Allerton deC. Tompkins*of counsel) for the defendant.

Eewall, Judge:

This is a collector’s appeal for ■ reappraisement and relates to the dutiable value of certain fishhooks. At the hearing it was stipulated that as, to the item 2627 R described as “40400 only Aberdeen Hks. Ringed Blue 2/0” the proper value is 9. shillings and 6 pence’ and that the work sheet was in error in showing a value of *4556 pence. It was further agreed that said 9 shillings, 6 pence represents the proper export value and that the foreign value is no higher.

On the agreed facts I find that the export value, as defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, is the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise in dispute and that such value is 9 shillings, 6 pence per M.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
#### Wu Biao YANG, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 04-71136.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 12, 2005.*

Decided Sept. 19, 2005.

*875Jisheng Li, Esq., Law Office of Jisheng Li, Honolulu, HI, for Petitioner.

HI-District Counsel, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, Honolulu, HI, Ronald E. Lefevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Nancy E. Friedman, Esq., DOJ—U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: REINHARDT, RYMER, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Wu Biao Yang, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ summary affirmance of an Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of his applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence and may reverse only if the evidence compels a contrary conclusion. *Rostomian v. INS,*210 F.3d 1088, 1089 (9th Cir.2000). We deny the petition.

Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s decision that petitioner failed to establish past persecution or a well-founded fear of future persecution on account of an enumerated ground. Petitioner testified that he accidently hit a government official after the government requested that he relocate his mother’s burial site because the government planned to build a commercial port on the site. Because there is no evidence that the government’s request to move the burial site was on account of political opinion, petitioner’s asylum claim fails. *See INS v. Elias-Zacarias,*502 U.S. 478, 482-84, 112 S.Ct. 812, 117 L.Ed.2d 38 (1992) (holding that guerrilla group’s attempt to recruit alien did not establish persecution based on political opinion); *Molina-Estrada v. INS,*293 F.3d 1089, 1094-95 (9th Cir.2002) (holding that alien must show that the persecutors imputed a political opinion to him).

Because petitioner failed to demonstrate that he was eligible for asylum, it follows that he did not satisfy the more stringent standard for withholding of removal. *See Singh-Kaur v. INS,*183 F.3d 1147, 1149 (9th Cir.1999).

Petitioner also fails to establish a CAT claim because he did not show that it was more likely than not that he would be tortured if he was returned to China. *See Kamalthas v. INS,*251 F.3d 1279, 1283 (9th Cir.2001).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

**This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
No. 53244.

#### Leather Trading Corp. *v.*United States,

protests 132483-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1996
<CASH>                                          21,347
<SECURITIES>                                 1,535,468
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,616,858
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  2,259,133
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,560,511
<PP&E>                                       3,061,296
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,030,137
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,657,244
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,014,407
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          816,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,826,837
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,657,244
<SALES>                                      4,854,133
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,872,965
<CGS>                                        3,559,425
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,055,238
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                817,727
<INCOME-TAX>                                   318,913
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            498,814
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   498,814
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .61
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES

                SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                           Washington, D.C. 20549

                                  FORM 10 Q

[XX]  QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE 
                    SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

        For the quarterly period ended September 30, 1996

                                OR

[   ]  TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
       EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

     For the transition period from _________ to ________.

                  Commission File Number 0-7771

             URBAN IMPROVEMENT FUND LIMITED   1973 II       
      (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

          California                                         95-6398192     
State or other jurisdiction of                (I.R.S. Employer   
incorporation or organization                 Identification No.)

1201 Third Avenue, Suite 5400, Seattle, Washington               98101
     (Address of principal executive offices)                 (ZIP code)    

Registrant's telephone number, including area code:  (206) 622-9900  


     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
 required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
 of 1934 during the preceding 12 months and (2) has been subject to such
 filing requirements for the past 90 days.   

                           XXX Yes         No  

<PAGE>
   
                                              SIGNATURES
     

     Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
 Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be
 signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

                           URBAN IMPROVEMENT FUND LIMITED   1973 II
                                               (Registrant)
                           By:  Interfinancial Real Estate Management
                                     Company, General Partner



Date 04/30/97                   Michael Fulbright                    
                                    (Signature)
                              By:  Michael Fulbright, Secretary         



Date 04/30/97                   John M. Orehek                       
                                    (Signature)
                              By:  John M. Orehek, Senior Vice President
December 12, 1947

No. 7478.

#### *Marine Products Co.*v. *United States.*

REHEARING MOTION GRANTED

Entered at San Diego, Calif. (Reap. Dec. 7373). Motion by plaintiff.
No. 53784.

protest 141445-K (Providence).

#### Goff & Page Company *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Cole, J.

The protest was dismissed.
# C_2015213EN.01004801.xml

| 29.6.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 213/48 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.6.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 213/48

---

Action brought on 21 April 2015 — ZZ v Commission

(Case F-59/15)

(2015/C 213/77)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: T. Bontinck and A. Guillerme, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Application for annulment of the decision not to pay the severance grant requested by the applicant after his service had ended and an application for the grant of damages in respect of the harm allegedly suffered.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Tribunal should:

| — | order the payment of the requested severance grant, together with the interest accrued as of 26 March 2014, the date on which that grant should have been paid, calculated on the basis of the rate fixed by the European Central Bank for its main refinancing operations, applicable during the period concerned, increased by two points; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the payment of the requested severance grant, together with the interest accrued as of 26 March 2014, the date on which that grant should have been paid, calculated on the basis of the rate fixed by the European Central Bank for its main refinancing operations, applicable during the period concerned, increased by two points;

| — | grant compensation for the harm suffered by the applicant, subject to being increased or decreased during the proceedings, of EUR 4  275,80, together with interest accruing from the date on which the complaint was brought (16 September 2014), calculated on the basis of the rate fixed by the European Central Bank for its main refinancing operations, applicable during the period concerned, increased by two points; |
| --- | --- |

—

grant compensation for the harm suffered by the applicant, subject to being increased or decreased during the proceedings, of EUR 4  275,80, together with interest accruing from the date on which the complaint was brought (16 September 2014), calculated on the basis of the rate fixed by the European Central Bank for its main refinancing operations, applicable during the period concerned, increased by two points;

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs.

---
#### Eurasia Import Co., Inc. *v.*United States

No. 6274.

Entry No. 37360, etc.

Invoices dated Kobe, Japan, June 30, 1939, etc.

Certified July 5, 1939, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., August 1, 1939. etc.

Second Division, Appellate Term

(Decided on remand [C. A. D. 326] May 1, 1946)

*James W. Bevans*for the appellant.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the appellee.

Before Tilson, Kincheloe, and Lawrence, Judges

Tilson, Judge:

In our original decision of this application for review, Reap. Dec. 6092, we made the following finding of fact:

From our review of the record,, we feel that it shows an export value for Quality No. 100 of .38 yen, packed ex Kobe, and for Quality No. 200 of .495 yen, packed ex Kobe, which, as we understand, is equivalent to the entered values, except as to those items which were cut into 15-yard lengths and for which cutting there was an extra charge of sen. This extra charge of sen per yard should, of course, be added to the value of those items which were cut from 30-yard lengths to 15-yard lengths.

An appeal was taken from our decision to the Court of Customs and Patent Appeals, and in remanding the case, our appellate court, *354among other things, said, with reference to the above-quoted finding of this court:

It was our purpose to approve this finding and we do now approve and affirm it, subject to the qualification that the appellate division should consider the items of commission and control fee and declare, upon the facts it may find from the record concerning them, whether or not they should be added to the values stated in the finding quoted.

Counsel for the respective parties have now agreed as follows:

* * * that the merchandise covered by the above reappraisements was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of Japan, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade for exportation to the United States at the time of exportation of the shipments covered by this stipulation, at the prices determined by this. Court in Reap. Dec. 6092 and affirmed by the U. S. Court of Customs and Patent Appeals in its clarification opinion rendered February 11, 1946 of its remand decision of January 4, 1946, C. A. D. 326, Suit 4511, plus the commissions and control fees specified on the consular invoices covering such shipments.

We therefore find and hold the proper dutiable export value of the merchandise covered by this application for review to be, for quality No. 100, .38 yen packed ex Kobe, and for quality No. 200, .495 yen, packed ex Kobe, plus *%*sen per yard for those items which were cut from 30-yard lengths to 15-yard lengths, plus the items of commissions and control fees, as specified on the consular invoices. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Job Performance and Age: a Study in Measurement

              																	Mark, Jerome A. (Jerome Albert). 						*Job Performance and Age: a Study in Measurement : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 1203*,												Washington: 								U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 										September 1956,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/4497,			accessed on September 25, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
Before the Third Division,

June 20, 1958

No. 62112.

#### John F. Kilroy Co. and Titus Blatter & Co. *v.*United States,

protest 204255-K (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise, facts, and issues are the same in all material respects as those the subject of *R. J. Saunders & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(37 Cust. Ct. 267, C. D. 1834), the collector was directed to reliquidate the entry, assessing duty upon the basis of the unit appraised value per conditioned pound or kilo, multiplied by the total number of conditioned pounds or kilos, as set forth in the invoice.
### Geology and ground-water resources of Bradley, Calhoun, and Ouachita Counties, Arkansas

By: Donald R. Albin

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1779G

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report** 
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 4**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 5**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 6**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 7**                            (1337 pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.1


                Certification of the Principal Executive Officer


                           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350


                 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)


I, M. David Jones, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Wallace Computer
Services, Inc. (the "Company") certify that to the best of my knowledge, based
upon a review of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended October
31, 2002 of the Company (the "Report"):

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.



/s/ M. David Jones
-------------------

M. David Jones
Wallace Computer Services
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer


December 13, 2002
No. 62106.

#### Modernaire Furniture, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 277759-K/7634 (Chicago).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of headboards similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 61224, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

January 8, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

135012 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 135012 

 COA: 270831 

Wayne CC: 05-010939-01 

THOMAS MARIO RANGE, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 21, 2007 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

t1217 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

January 8, 2008 

 Clerk