alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-7495
FLOYD NEWBY, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus EDDIE PEARSON, Warden; MR. PONTON, Assistant Warden, Defendants - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, District Judge. (CA-97-48-AM) Submitted: January 22, 1998 Decided: February 4, 1998 Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Floyd Newby, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Mark Ralph Davis, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant, a Virginia inmate, app eals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A (West Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the recordand the district court's opinion and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Newby v. Pearson , CA-97-48-AM (E.D. Va. Sept. 29, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
# C_2016118EN.01000701.xml

| 4.4.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 118/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.4.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 118/7

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesverwaltungsgericht Oberösterreich (Austria) lodged on 18 December 2015 — Online Games Handels GmbH and Others v Landespolizeidirektion Oberösterreich

(Case C-685/15)

(2016/C 118/08)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Landesverwaltungsgericht Oberösterreich

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Online Games Handels GmbH, Frank Breuer, Nicole Enter, Astrid Walden

Applicants:

Defendant authority: Landespolizeidirektion Oberösterreich

Defendant authority:

Question referred

Question referred

Is Article 56 TFEU or Article 49 et seq. TFEU, in the light of Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights read in conjunction with Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights, to be interpreted, having regard to the judicial objectivity and impartiality required by the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights (in particular with regard to its judgment of 18 May 2010, Application No 64962/01, paragraph 54), as precluding, in the light of the case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Union (in particular its judgment of 30 April 2014, C-390/12, (1) a national rule according to which, in the case of administrative offence proceedings, it is not for the State prosecution services (or other State prosecution bodies) in their function of representing the prosecution but rather for the court called upon to rule on the legality of the criminal measure against which an action has been brought, of its own motion and independently of the conduct of the parties to the proceedings, (in one and the same person/function) to state and delimit wholly independently the evidence justifying the criminal law protection of the quasi-monopoly regulation of the national gambling market and then autonomously to investigate and evaluate it?

1

---

(1)  ECLI:EU:C:2014:281 Pfleger and Others.

1

Pfleger and Others

---
Summary of Guaranty Contract
of Maximum Amount ( the “Contract”) Entered into by and between Xiangqian Li and
Shenzhen Branch, China Citic Bank (the “Creditor”) on May 31,
2010





Main
contents:


Ø        Guaranty
Contract number: (2010) Shenyinsun Ebaozi 001;


Ø        Main
Contract number: (2010) Shenyinsun ZongEzi 004


Ø        Xiangqian
Li undertakes to assume joint and several liabilities for Shenzhen BAK
Battery Co., Ltd (the “Obligor”)’s indebtedness towards China
Citic Bank, and the maximum amount secured is RMB 80
million.


Ø        Guaranty Responsibility: The guaranty
under this Contract shall be guaranty with joint and several liabilities. The
guarantor is obligated to pay off the debt in the event the obligor is unable to
pay off the debt (including the creditor declares the debt becomes mature in
advance to its original expiry date due to default of the obligor or the
guarantor).


Ø        Scope ofGuaranty:The guaranty shall cover
all of the loan principal, interest, penalty interest, breach of contract
compensation, damages, undertaking fee and all the expenses such as litigation
cost, lawyer’s fee, notification cost and public notice cost etc. which is
incurred to the Creditor in realizing its creditor’s right.


Ø        Guaranty period: The
guaranty period is from the effective date of this Contract to two years after
the expiry of the term of the Credit Facility Agreement and relevant agreement
entered into under the Credit Facility Agreement.





Headlines
of the articles omitted:


Ø        Termination
and explanation


Ø        Payment
on demand


Ø        Declaration
and guaranty


Ø        Independent
guaranty


Ø        Fulfillment
of the responsibility and giving up of the right


Ø        Amendment
of Contract


Ø        Effectiveness
and Disputation settlement


Ø        Contract
period


Ø        Supplement
articles
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

                    The companies listed in this notice have given notice under section 4 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843) (BHC Act) and Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225) to engage                     *de novo*, or to acquire or control voting securities or assets of a company, including the companies listed below, that engages either directly or through a subsidiary or other company, in a nonbanking activity that is listed in § 225.28 of Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.28) or that the Board has determined by Order to be closely related to banking and permissible for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise noted, these activities will be conducted throughout the United States.                

                    Each notice is available for inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notice also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing on the question whether the proposal complies with the standards of section 4 of the BHC Act. Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained from the National Information Center website at                     *www.ffiec.gov/​nic/​*.                

Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding the applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors not later than May 29, 2007.

**A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta**                     (David Tatum, Vice President) 1000 Peachtree Street, N.E., Atlanta, Georgia 30309:                

*1. GB&T Bancshares, Inc.*, Gainesville, Georgia; to acquire GB&T Mortgage, Inc., Cumming, Georgia, and thereby engage in making, acquiring, brokering, or servicing loans or other extensions of credit, pursuant to section 225.28(b)(1) of Regulation Y.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, May 8, 2007.

Robert deV. Frierson,

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. E7-9095 Filed 5-10-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 13 (Thursday, January 20, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3677-3678]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-1089]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

THE NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES

Federal Council on the Arts and the Humanities; Arts and 
Artifacts Indemnity Panel Advisory Committee; Meeting

AGENCY: The National Endowment for the Humanities.

[[Page 3678]]

ACTION: Notice of Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(Pub. L. 92-463 as amended) notice is hereby given that a meeting of 
the Arts and Artifacts Indemnity Panel of the Federal Council on the 
Arts and the Humanities will be held at 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., 
Washington, DC 20506, in Room 730, from 9:30 a.m. to 5 p.m., on Monday, 
February 7, 2011.
    The purpose of the meeting is to review applications for 
Certificates of Indemnity submitted to the Federal Council on the Arts 
and the Humanities for exhibitions beginning after April 1, 2011.
    Because the proposed meeting will consider financial and commercial 
data and because it is important to keep values of objects, methods of 
transportation and security measures confidential, pursuant to the 
authority granted me by the Chairman's Delegation of Authority to Close 
Advisory Committee Meetings, dated July l9, l993, I have determined 
that the meeting would fall within exemption (4) of 5 U.S.C. 552(b) and 
that it is essential to close the meeting to protect the free exchange 
of views and to avoid interference with the operations of the 
Committee.
    It is suggested that those desiring more specific information 
contact Advisory Committee Management Officer, Michael P. McDonald, 
1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20506, or call 202-606-
8322.

Michael P. McDonald,
Advisory Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2011-1089 Filed 1-19-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7536-01-P
```
|  | 1. | The      Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009 (the      “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the      Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | 2. | Information      contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the      financial condition and results of operations of the    Company. |
|--|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/      Xiangqian Li              |   |   |
|------------------------------------|--------|--------|
| Xiangqian      Li                  |   |   |
| Chief      Executive Officer       |   |   |
| (Principal      Executive Officer) |   |   |
|                               |   |   |
| /s/      Tony Shen                 |   |   |
| Tony      Shen                     |   |   |
| Chief      Financial Officer       |   |   |
| (Principal      Financial Officer) |   |   |

----
H. Con. Res. 41 Agreed to January 23, 2007

One Hundred Tenth Congress

of the

United States of America 

AT THE FIRST SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday, 

the fourth day of January, two thousand and seven 

Concurrent Resolution

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), That when the House adjourns on the legislative day of 

Wednesday, January 24, 2007, on a motion offered pursuant to 

this concurrent resolution by its Majority Leader or his designee, 

it stand adjourned until 2 p.m. on Monday, January 29, 2007, 

or until the time of any reassembly pursuant to section 2 of this 

concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first; and that when the 

House adjourns on the legislative day of Wednesday, January 31, 

2007, on a motion offered pursuant to this concurrent resolution 

by its Majority Leader or his designee, it stand adjourned until 

2 p.m. on Monday, February 5, 2007, or until the time of any 

reassembly pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution, 

whichever occurs first. 

SEC. 2. The Speaker or her designee, after consultation with 

the Minority Leader, shall notify the Members of the House to 

reassemble at such place and time as she may designate if, in 

her opinion, the public interest shall warrant it. 

Attest:

Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

Secretary of the Senate.
(Reap. Dec. 9838)

#### M. Farris & Co., Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 745482.

(Decided November 9, 1960)

Plaintiff not represented by counsel.

*George Goehran Doud,*Assistant Attorney General, for tbe defendant.

Lawrence, Judge:

There was no appearance on behalf of plaintiff when the above-enumerated appeal for a reappraisement was called for hearing and the case was ordered submitted by the court.

Rule 5(a) of the rules of the court provides that—

> Tbe submission for decision of any ease shall be made in open court by tbe parties thereto or their attorneys, or by stipulation, or by written request to *553the court, or by the court on its own motion. Where the plaintiff, petitioner, or appellant, or his attorney, in a case does not appear when the same is called, and after the opposite party has had opportunity to present evidence on the issues, it may be deemed submitted and may be decided by the court on the record as it appears therein.

Accordingly, I Rave examined the record in the appeal before the. court and find nothing therein which tends in any way to overcome the presumption of correctness which attaches to the decision of the appraiser. I find and hold, therefore, that the proper value of the merchandise is the value returned by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
No. 42028.

#### Protest 154358-G of R. H. Macy & Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of *United States*v. *Amrein*(26 C. C. P. A. 353, C. A. D. 40), *Pustet*v. *United States*(13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 530, T. D. 41396), and *United States*v. *Smith*(12 id. 384, T. D. 40544) Normandy laces, embroidered motives, embroidered dress in part of lace, pillow slips embroidered and in part of lace, and embroidered trimmings were held dutiable at 75 percent under paragraph 1430 as claimed.
Exhibit 12 (b)

                             BNP U.S. FUNDING L.L.C.
                             -----------------------

                Computation of ratio of earnings to fixed charges
                        and preferred securities dividend
                          (in thousands, except ratios)

                                                                 Twelve-month
                                                                 period ended
                                                               December 31,2000
                                                               ----------------

Net income.................................................      $     66,341
                                                                       ------
Fixed Charges
      Audit Fees...........................................                79
      Trustee Fees.........................................               120
      Administrative Fees..................................               771
                                                                          ---
Total Fixed Charges........................................               970
                                                                          ---
Earnings before fixed charges..............................      $     67,311

Fixed charges, as above....................................               970
Preferred securities dividend..............................            38,690
                                                                       ------
Fixed charges including preferred securities dividends.....      $     39,660
                                                                       ======
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
and preferred securities dividend..........................              1.70
                                                                         ====
1

Filed 7/3/14 P. v. Waiton CA1/4 

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS 

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for 

publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication 

or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115. 

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT 

DIVISION FOUR 

THE PEOPLE, 

 Plaintiff and Respondent, 

v. 

THOMAS DAVID WAITON, 

 Defendant and Appellant. 

 A139498 

 (Sonoma County 

 Super. Ct. No. SCR628630, 

 SCR 632438) 

 Thomas David Waiton appeals from an order deeming him incompetent to stand 

trial on making criminal threats and drug charges, committing him to a state hospital, and 

authorizing the facility to administer antipsychotic medication to him involuntarily. He 

contends the trial court erred in denying his Marsden1 motion without a hearing, where 

the request to substitute counsel was made after the court found him incompetent to stand 

trial but before it held the involuntary medication and placement hearing. The orders 

were entered in June and July 2013. 

 In June 2014, after the appeal was fully briefed, appellate counsel wrote to the 

court, reporting he had learned that appellant had been declared competent and entered no 

contest pleas to two counts, that the trial court suspended imposition of sentence, and that 

appellant was released from custody. The issues raised by the appeal are therefore moot, 

and we lack jurisdiction to consider them further. (Giles v. Horn (2002) 100 Cal.App.4th 

206, 226-227; People v. Lindsey (1971) 20 Cal.App.3d 742, 743-744.) 

 

1

 People v. Marsden (1970) 2 Cal.3d 118. 
2

DISPOSITION 

 The appeal is dismissed as moot. 

 _________________________ 

 REARDON, ACTING P. J. 

We concur: 

_________________________ 

RIVERA, J. 

_________________________ 

HUMES, J.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1288 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1288

To exempt certain class A CDL drivers from the requirement to obtain a 
hazardous material endorsement while operating a service vehicle with a 
  fuel tank containing 3,785 liters (1,000 gallons) or less of diesel 
                                 fuel.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 28, 2011

 Mr. Roberts (for himself, Mr. Nelson of Nebraska, Mr. Moran, and Mr. 
   Johanns) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
   referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To exempt certain class A CDL drivers from the requirement to obtain a 
hazardous material endorsement while operating a service vehicle with a 
  fuel tank containing 3,785 liters (1,000 gallons) or less of diesel 
                                 fuel.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. HAZARDOUS MATERIAL ENDORSEMENT EXEMPTION.

    (a) Exclusion.--Section 5117(d)(1) of title 49, United States Code, 
is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (B), by striking ``and'' at the end;
            (2) in subparagraph (C), by striking the period at the end 
        and inserting ``; and''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(D) a service vehicle carrying diesel fuel in 
                quantities of 3,785 liters (1,000 gallons) or less that 
                is--
                            ``(i) driven by a class A commercial 
                        driver's license holder who is a custom 
                        harvester, an agricultural retailer, an 
                        agricultural business employee, an agricultural 
                        cooperative employee, or an agricultural 
                        producer; and
                            ``(ii) clearly marked with a placard 
                        reading `Diesel Fuel'.''.
    (b) Exemption.--Section 31315(b) of title 49, United States Code, 
is amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``(8) Hazardous materials endorsement exemption.--The 
        Secretary shall exempt all class A commercial driver's license 
        holders who are custom harvesters, agricultural retailers, 
        agricultural business employees, agricultural cooperative 
        employees, or agricultural producers from the requirement to 
        obtain a hazardous material endorsement under part 383 of title 
        49, Code of Federal Regulations, while operating a service 
        vehicle carrying diesel fuel in quantities of 3,785 liters 
        (1,000 gallons) or less if the tank containing such fuel is 
        clearly marked with a placard reading `Diesel Fuel'.''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-03-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          51,076
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   25,627
<ALLOWANCES>                                       383
<INVENTORY>                                     11,211
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                95,363
<PP&E>                                         109,998
<DEPRECIATION>                                  54,412
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 163,913
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           38,040
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,343
<OTHER-SE>                                     121,661
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   163,913
<SALES>                                         40,840
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                40,840
<CGS>                                           19,146
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   19,146
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 10,520
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,934
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,586
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,586
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .54
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .54
        

</TABLE>