alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.2


I, Christine R. Larson, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Trinity
Learning Corporation;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this transition report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c)    disclosed in this report any change in internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting;

5.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board
of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)   all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.


Date:     February 23, 2004

          /S/ CHRISTINE R. LARSON
          --------------------------
          Christine R. Larson
          Chief Financial Officer
No. 54926.

#### Anglo-Oriental Importing & Rug Co. *v.*United States,

protest 121097-K (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of rugs and carpets exported from Iran between the dates of December 21, 1939, and September 26, 1941, and that the merchandise and issues are similar in alL material respects to those involved in Abstract 54056. In accordance with stipulation and pursuant to the instructions contained in T. D. 51892, the collector was directed to reliquidate the entries, converting the currency of the invoices, Iranian rials, to United States dollars at the rate of $.053475 as to all items, except such as were exported for the benefit of drawback.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1421 

KA 07-02437 

PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, GREEN, GORSKI, AND MARTOCHE, JJ. 

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

JOSEPH EDWARDS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

 

FRANK H. HISCOCK LEGAL AID SOCIETY, SYRACUSE (WILLIAM G. PIXLEY OF

COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

WILLIAM J. FITZPATRICK, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, SYRACUSE (JAMES P. MAXWELL

OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County

(John J. Brunetti, A.J.), rendered November 9, 2007. The judgment

convicted defendant, upon a jury verdict, of sexual abuse in the first

degree and endangering the welfare of a child. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed. 

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him

upon a jury verdict of sexual abuse in the first degree (Penal Law §

130.65 [2]) and endangering the welfare of a child (§ 260.10 [1]). 

Viewing the evidence in light of the elements of the crimes as charged

to the jury (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 349), we conclude

that the verdict is not against the weight of the evidence (see

generally People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495). Defendant’s objection

to the testimony of the victim’s half-sister on the ground that it was

speculative and irrelevant did not preserve for our review his present

contentions that such testimony improperly bolstered the victim’s

credibility (see People v Valentine, 48 AD3d 1268, 1268-1269, lv

denied 10 NY3d 871), and exceeded the scope of the prompt outcry

exception to the hearsay rule (see People v Stearns, 72 AD3d 1214,

1218, lv denied 15 NY3d 778). We decline to exercise our power to

review those contentions as a matter of discretion in the interest of

justice (see CPL 470.15 [6] [a]).

Entered: December 23, 2011 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
No. 55491.

#### George Cohn *v.*United States,

protest 158954-K (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

The protest was dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from B.B.
Walker's Form 10-Q for the third quarter of fiscal 1999 and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000104218
<NAME> B.B. WALKER COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-30-1999
<CASH>                                               1
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,971
<ALLOWANCES>                                       569
<INVENTORY>                                      9,663
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                17,307
<PP&E>                                           8,177
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,661
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  18,948
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,807
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         83
<COMMON>                                         1,746
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,203
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    18,948
<SALES>                                         18,937
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                19,071
<CGS>                                           13,707
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   18,992
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     2
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   225
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 699
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (622)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (622)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (622)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.36)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.36)


</TABLE>
No. 44260.

#### Protests 919813-G, etc., of McCormick & Co., Inc. (Baltimore).

*304Opinion by

Evans, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of ginger root similar to that passed upon in *Wilson*v. *United States*(28 C. C. P. A. —, C. A. D. 126). The claim for free entry under paragraph 1768 was therefore sustained.
(logo) **Deutsche Bank**

 

1761 East St. Andrew Place

Santa Ana, CA92705-4934

 

Tel 714 247 6000

Fax 714 247 6009 

 

 

ANNUAL STATEMENT AS TOCOMPLIANCE

 

COMM 2016-DC2

 

The undersigned, David Co, a Directorof Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as the Certificate Administrator (a"Certifying Servicer") under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement,dated as of March 1, 2016 (the "Agreement"), by and among, DeutscheMortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation, as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank,National Association, as Master Servicer, CWCapital Asset Management LLC, asSpecial Servicer, Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee, DeutscheBank Trust Company Americas, as Certificate Administrator, Paying Agent andCustodian, Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, as Operating Advisor, and ParkBridge Lender Services LLC, as Asset Representations Reviewer here by certifiesin accordance with Section 10.11of the Agreement:

 

A)           A review of such Certifying Servicer's activities from March 1, 2016 toDecember 31, 2016 (the "reporting period") and of such CertifyingServicer's performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer'ssupervision and

B)           That, as to the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, suchCertifying Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement, inall material respects throughout the reporting period.

 

DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANYAMERICAS

as Certificate Administrator

 

 

/s/ David Co

BY: David Co 

Title:  Director

Date: March 1, 2017
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER OF S TAY

Appellate case n ame: South Texas Medical Clinic

, P.A. v. Maria Barrera, Individually and

as next friend of V. B. and F. B., minors, David A. Barrera, Gabriela

Barrera, Karla Barrera and Stefani Barrera, as wrongful death

beneficiaries of Sonia Barrera

Appellate case number: 01

- 13

- 00093

- CV

Trial court case number: 12DCV198295

Trial court: 434th District Court of Fort Bend County

The parties have filed an agreed motion to st ay the appeal proceedings until May 31,

2013, to conduct mediation

, and to establish an agreed briefing schedule , should the appeal

continue

.

The motion is grant ed

, and the appeal is stayed until May 31, 2013

.

The parties are directed to provide the Court with an update on the outcome of mediation

on or before May 31, 2013

.

Pursuant to the parties’ agreement, i f the appeal continues, appellant’s brief is due no

later than July 1 , 2013. Appellee s ’ brief is due no later than July 22 , 2013.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Jane B l and

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: April 15, 2013
Before the Second Division,

June 18, 1958

No. 62090.

#### Plus Computing Machines, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 275601-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of key-driven calculating machines and metal parts thereof *607similar in all material respects, except for having, in addition, an electric motor as an essential feature, to the merchandise the subject of *Plus Computing Machines, Inc.*v. *United States*(44 C. C. P. A. 160, C. A. D. 655), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 53819.

protest 116587-K (Minneapolis).

#### The Loucraft Corporation *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

For the reasons stated in *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C. D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Exhibit
13.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


RULE
13a-14(b)/RULE 15d-14(b) UNDER THE EXCHANGE ACT


AND
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report of Fundtech Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F
for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Reuven Ben Menachem, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)          
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)          
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




Date:
June 12, 2009




/s/ Reuven Ben MenachemReuven
      Ben MenachemChief
      Executive Officer(Principal
      Executive
Officer)




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley
Act of 2002 has been provided to Fundtech Ltd. and will be retained by Fundtech
Ltd. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.19


                               DAVOX CORPORATION

             SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT NORTH AMERICAN SALES OPERATIONS

                          SEVERANCE AGREEMENT - 2000

DAVOX Corporation ("DAVOX") will provide to you the following terms and
condition of salary and benefits continuation:

     (1.)  DAVOX shall provide a continuation of your base salary and medical
           benefits at DAVOX's cost, as may be in effect at the time of a
           qualifying termination as set forth in subclause 2, commencing upon
           the date of termination, for a period of six (6) months or until such
           time as you assume new employment, whichever comes first;

     (2.)  DAVOX shall provide continuation of salary and benefits as set forth
           in subclause (1) in the event your employment is terminated for the
           following reasons: (a) economic layoff; (b) downsizing of the North
           American Sales Operations organization which results in the
           elimination of your position as Senior Vice President North American
           Sales Operations; or (c) reorganization of the North American Sales
           Operations organization which would require you to relocate.

Following the effective date of termination, as set forth in writing and
furnished to you by DAVOX, your employment with DAVOX shall cease and you shall
not hold yourself as an employee, agent, or representative of DAVOX.

Continuation of salary and benefits shall further be subject to your compliance
with any then existing company policies and such other terms as may be in effect
between you and DAVOX pertaining to the disclosure of confidential or
proprietary information.

DAVOX has final authority to determine all questions of eligibility to receive
benefits under this arrangement and to interpret and construe the terms of this
arrangement.


Approval

        /s/ Alphonse M. Lucchese                               3/1/00
        --------------------------------------                 ---------------
        Chairman & Chief Executive Officer                     Date


        /s/ Joseph R. Coleman                                      3/1/99
        --------------------------------------                 ---------------
        Senior Vice President North American Sales Operations  Date
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v CHARLES B. JELKS, Fireman Apprentice, U. S. Navy, Appellant

8 USCMA 593, 25 CMR 97

No. 10,700

Decided January 10, 1958

*Commander H. H.*Brandenburg, USN, was on the brief for Appellant, Accused.

*Lieutenant Colonel Charles H. Beale, Jr.,*USMC, was on the brief for Appellee, United States.

Opinion of the Court

HomeR FeRguson, Judge:

The accused was charged with two specifications of desertion under Article 85, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 885. He pleaded not guilty to each specification of desertion but guilty to the lesser offense of absence without leave, in violation of Article 86 of the Code, 10 USC § 886. He was found guilty of desertion on the first specification, but only guilty of unauthorized absence on the second. The law officer instructed the court-martial as follows:

> “The court is advised that if the condition of the accused’s absence without proper authority is much prolonged and there is no satisfactory explanation of it, the court will be justified in inferring from that alone the intent to remain absent permanently. It is a question of fact solely within the province of the court to determine whether the condition of the absence is much prolonged.”

This Court, in United States v Cothern, 8 USCMA 158, 23 CMR 382, held a similar instruction to be both erroneous and prejudicial. See also United States v Soccio, 8 USCMA 477, 24 CMR 287. The conviction of desertion therefore cannot stand. The record is returned to The Judge Advocate General of the Navy for reference to a board of review. The board, in its discretion, may affirm the lesser offense of absence without leave and reassess the entire sentence, or it may order a rehearing on the desertion charge.

Chief Judge QuiNN concurs.

Latimer, Judge

(concurring in the result) :

I concur in the result for the reasons expressed in my separate opinion in United States v Sumrel, 8 USCMA 399, 24 CMR 209.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Thomas A. JOHNSON, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 04-30184.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 12, 2005.*

Decided Sept. 19, 2005.

Stephanie J. Lister, USSP—Office of the U.S. Attorney, Spokane, WA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Kathleen Moran, Esq., FPDWA—Federal Public Defender’s Office, Spokane, WA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: REINHARDT, RYMER and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Thomas A. Johnson appeals his 27-month sentence imposed after a guilty plea conviction for possession of child pornography, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(a)(5)(B). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291.

Because appellant was sentenced under the then-mandatory Sentencing Guidelines, and we cannot reliably determine from the record whether the sentence imposed would have been materially different had the district court known that the Guidelines were advisory, we remand to the sentencing court to answer that question, and to proceed pursuant to *United States*
      *883
      *v. Ameline,*409 F.3d 1073, 1084 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc). *See United States v. Moreno-Hernandez,*419 F.3d 906 (9th Cir.2005) (9th Cir. Aug. 17, 2005) (extending Ameline’s limited remand procedure to cases involving non-constitutional *Booker*error).

REMANDED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 135 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 135

   To make the moratorium on Internet access taxes and multiple and 
         discriminatory taxes on electronic commerce permanent.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             January 25 (legislative day, January 5), 2011

  Mr. Ensign introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To make the moratorium on Internet access taxes and multiple and 
         discriminatory taxes on electronic commerce permanent.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Permanent Internet Tax Freedom Act 
of 2011''.

SEC. 2. PERMANENT MORATORIUM ON INTERNET ACCESS TAXES AND MULTIPLE AND 
              DISCRIMINATORY TAXES ON ELECTRONIC COMMERCE.

    (a) In General.--Section 1101(a) of the Internet Tax Freedom Act 
(47 U.S.C. 151 note) is amended by striking ``taxes during the period 
beginning November 1, 2003, and ending November 1, 2014:'' and 
inserting ``taxes:''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to taxes imposed after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

No. 21

- 60746 Summary Calendar

**Achaleke Fuanya,**

Petitioner **,**

versus

**Merrick Garland,** U.S. Attorney General **,**
Respondent

**.**

Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Agency No. A201 744 894

Before **Davis, Smith,**  and **Dennis,** Circuit Judges

**. Per Curiam**  **:** *
Achaleke Fuanya, a native and citizen of Cameroon, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) dismissing his appeal from an order of the Immigration Judge (IJ). He challenges the BIA’s determination that he was ineligible for asylum and relief under the

* Pursuant to **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED August 1, 2022
Lyle W. Cayc e Clerk Case: 21-60746 Document: 00516414645 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/01/2022No. 21

- 60746

2 Convention Against Torture (CAT)

. He fails to brief the issue whether the BIA erred by dismissing his appeal from the denial of withholding of removal and thus has waived any arguments he may have had regarding this issue. See Soadjede v. Ashcroft , 324 F.3d 830, 833 (5th C ir. 2003)

. Insofar as he challenges the BIA’s conclu sion that he waived the issue whether he submitted sufficient evidence to corroborate his discredited testimony , we lack jurisdiction to consider this issue because it is unexhausted. See
Martinez

- Guevara v. Garland , 27 F.4th 353, 360 (5th Cir. 2022)

.
We rev iew the BIA’s decision for substantial evidence, see Zhang

v. Gonzales , 432 F.3d 339, 344 (5th Cir. 2005) , and consider the IJ’s decision only insofar as it influenced the BIA, see Singh v. Sessions , 880 F.3d 220, 224 (5th Cir. 2018). Fuanya ’s challenge t o the BIA’s adverse credibility determination is unavailing because the disputed determination is supported by “specific and cogent reasons derived from the record,” see Zhang , 432 F.3d at 344, and consideration of the record as a whole does not show that
“no reasonable fact

- finder” could make such a determination, see Singh , 880 F.3d at 225; see also id. at 224. The record refutes his assertion that the BIA failed to consider his country conditions evidence, and he has not shown that
the record evidence c ompels a conclusion contrary to that of the BIA on the issue whether he has shown he more likely than not would be tortured with official acquiescence if repatriated. See Ramirez

- Mejia v. Lynch , 794 F.3d 485, 493 (5th Cir. 2015); Zhang , 432 F.3d at 344

. The petition for review is

**DENIED** in part and **DISMISSED** in part

. Case: 21-60746 Document: 00516414645 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/01/2022
WEINBERG & COMPANY, PA
                        Town Executive Center
                     6100 Glades Road, Suite 314
                      Boca Raton, Florida 33434


          CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT


We hereby consent to the use in the Form 10-KSB Annual Report for
the fiscal year ended December 31, 1998, of AmeriCom USA, Inc. our
report as of October 31, 1998, dated November 23, 1998 relating to
the financial statements of Chatsworth Acquisition Corporation which
appear in such Form 10-KSB.


                              WEINBERG & COMPANY PA
                              Certified Public Accountants


Boca Raton, Florida 
March 26, 1999