alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                         CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the
undersigned certifies that this periodic report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, and that information contained in this periodic report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Ask Jeeves, Inc.

Date:  March 12, 2003        /s/ A. George (Skip) Battle
                             --------------------------------
                             A. George (Skip) Battle
                             Chief Executive Officer

Date:  March 12, 2003        /s/ Steven J. Sordello
                             --------------------------------
                             Steven J. Sordello
                             Chief Financial Officer

This certification accompanies this periodic report pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                 EXHIBIT 10(q.1)


                       FIRST AMENDMENT TO SUPPLY AGREEMENT

This Amendment is entered into the 7th day of July, 1994 by and between DUSA
PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. ("DUSA"), a corporation organized and existing under the
laws of the State of New Jersey, USA, whose principal offices are at 6870
Goreway Drive, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada L4V 1P1, and SOCHINAZ S.A.
("SOCHINAZ"), a corporation registered under the laws of the Canton of Valais,
Switzerland, whose principal offices are at 22, rte du Simplon, CH-1895 Vionnaz,
Switzerland.

WHEREAS, DUSA and SOCHINAZ have entered into a Supply Agreement dated December
24, 1993 (the "Agreement"), pursuant to which SOCHINAZ sells to DUSA and DUSA
purchases from SOCHINAZ, a porphyrin precursor generally known as
5-aminolevulinic acid ("ALA") meeting certain specifications ("Product").

WHEREAS, DUSA and SOCHINAZ wish to amend the terms and conditions of the
Agreement, for the purpose of adding a provision that had been mistakenly left
out of the Agreement.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, and other good and valuable
consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which the parties acknowledge, the
parties agree to amend, effective as of December 24, 1993, the Agreement by
adding the following new provision:

"12. Inventions. SOCHINAZ shall disclose fully and promptly, and shall assign
and transfer promptly, to DUSA, its successors and assigns, free from any
obligation to SOCHINAZ, the entire right, title and interest to and in every
invention, improvement, discovery, process, apparatus or design, whether
patentable or unpatentable, conceived or made during the term of this Agreement
by SOCHINAZ or by any directors, officers, employees or agents of SOCHINAZ,
relating, in DUSA's opinion, in any way, to: (i) ALA or Product; (ii) any and
all salts of ALA, derivatives thereof or any compounds which may be converted in
vivo or in vitro to ALA or any other precursor of protoporphyrin IX or
equivalents thereto; (iii) the performance of SOCHINAZ's duties under this
Agreement; or (iv) SOCHINAZ'S work on ALA. Any and all such right, title and
interest shall be, and shall remain, the property of DUSA. During and after the
term of this Agreement, SOCHINAZ will fully cooperate with DUSA in applying for
and securing in DUSA's name patent or patents with respect to the disclosed
inventions in each country in which DUSA may desire to secure patent
protection."

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties execute this Agreement.


SOCHINAZ S.A.                         DUSA PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.


By: /s/ Christian Borgeaud            By: /s/ D. Geoffrey Shulman
   ----------------------------          --------------------------------------
        Christian A. BORGEAUD                 D. Geoffrey Shulman, MD, FRCPC


-------------------------------       ------------------------------------------
Title: Chief Executive Officer        Title: President & Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Brian T. Crowley, President and Chief Executive Officer, certify that:



| | 1. | To my knowledge, this report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To my knowledge, the information contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of BSQUARE
Corporation.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: March 17, 2011

/s/ Brian T. CrowleyBrian T. Crowley
President and Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 336 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 336

  Honoring the sacrifices and contributions made by disabled American 
                               veterans.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 29, 2008

 Mr. Altmire (for himself, Mr. Lynch, Mr. Boozman, and Mr. Bilirakis) 
 submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to 
                   the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
  Honoring the sacrifices and contributions made by disabled American 
                               veterans.

Whereas the people of the United States have a sincere appreciation and respect 
        for members of the Armed Forces who suffered disabling wounds while 
        serving in the United States military;
Whereas there are approximately 2,800,000 veterans receiving benefits from the 
        Department of Veterans Affairs for disabilities incurred while defending 
        our Nation;
Whereas the current wars in Iraq and Afghanistan have resulted in 30,000 
        disabled American veterans as a direct result of combat operations, and 
        even more so from conditions simulating war, instrumentalities of war, 
        and hazardous duty in combat-related training;
Whereas families throughout every State in America have been affected by loved 
        ones returning disabled from their service to their Nation;
Whereas the American public supports the brave men and women who have defended 
        the freedom of all in America;
Whereas America owes its very integrity to her sons and daughters in uniform, 
        who risk the most for the least, and who epitomize the extraordinary 
        meaning of service, sacrifice, and, most importantly, freedom; and
Whereas Americans should remember and honor our men and women in uniform who 
        incurred disabilities while defending our Nation with a Disabled 
        American Veterans Week: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That Congress--
            (1) recognizes the great sacrifices made by disabled 
        veterans and their families;
            (2) calls on the people of the United States to honor all 
        disabled American veterans and the freedom for which they 
        sacrificed;
            (3) encourages local, State, and national organizations and 
        governmental institutions to participate in the effort to honor 
        the sacrifices of America's disabled veterans; and
            (4) supports the goals and ideals of Disabled American 
        Veterans Week.
                                 <all>
```
Before the Third Division,

September 3, 1943

No. 48718.

#### Protests 642555-G, etc., of Musolino Berger Lo Conte Co. et al. (Boston).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and the cited cases the following allowances were made by the court to compensate for the weight of the foreign substances on the outside of certain cheese: (1) 21⁄2 percent for cheese similar to that the subject of *Scaramelli*v. *United States*(9 Cust. Ct. 270, C. D. 706) and Abstract 42146; and (2) 1 percent for that similar to Reggiano cheese the subjeét of *Scaramelli*v. *United States, supra.*
WEINBERG & COMPANY, PA
                        Town Executive Center
                     6100 Glades Road, Suite 314
                      Boca Raton, Florida 33434


          CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT


We hereby consent to the use in the Form 10-KSB Annual Report for
the fiscal year ended December 31, 1998, of AmeriCom USA, Inc. our
report as of June 30, 1998, and 1997, dated January 29, 1999 (except
for Note 13 (e) and Note 4 as to which the dates are February 8,
1999 and February 10, 1999, respectively) relating to the combined
financial statements of AmeriCom USA, Inc. and RMC Diversified
Associates International, Ltd. which appear in such Form 10-KSB.


                              WEINBERG & COMPANY PA
                              Certified Public Accountants


Boca Raton, Florida 
March 26, 1999
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED SEPTEMBER 22, 2023

NO. 03-22-00294-CV

Central Texas Building & Construction Trades Council; International Brotherhood of 

Electrical Workers, Local 520; United Association of Plumbers and Pipefitters, Local 286; 

International Union of Painters and Allied Trades, District Council 88; Philip Lawhon; 

Robin Drake; Riley Drake; David Ervin; Leeroy Hamilton; and Sean Ingram, Appellants

v.

Bastrop Independent School District; Ashley Mutschink, in his Official Capacity as 

President of the Board of Trustees; et al., Appellees

APPEAL FROM THE 423RD DISTRICT COURT OF BASTROP COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES BAKER, KELLY AND SMITH

DISMISSED ON APPELLANTS’ MOTION -- OPINION BY JUSTICE SMITH

This is an appeal from the order signed by the trial court on April 25, 2022. Appellants have 

filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, and having considered the motion, the Court agrees that the 

motion should be granted. Therefore, the Court grants the motion and dismisses the appeal. The 

appellants shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and in the court below.
INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA ON June 17, 1997.



*Certificate No.  **                                           **   Shares   **


                           Sun River Development Co.

                     Secretary of State File No. _____________

                                  COMMON STOCK

This certifies that __________________is the owner(s) of ____________ fully paid
and  non-assessable  shares of Sun River  Development  Research  Group,  Inc., a
Nevada  corporation,  transferable  only on the books of the  Corporation by the
holder hereof, in person or by duly authorized Attorney,  upon surrender of this
Certificate, properly endorsed.

In Witness Whereof, the Corporation has caused this Certificate of be issued and
signed by its duly appointed officers on ________.


_______________________________                  _______________________________
President                                        Secretary

                           $0.01 PAR VALUE PER SHARE
Exhibit 10.45.2

AMENDMENT TO INCENTIVE AGREEMENT

The parties hereby agree to amend the certain INCENTIVE AGREEMENT ("Agreement") entered into as of January 2, 2001 (the "effective date"), by and between
Ask Jeeves, Inc. and Claudio Pinkus ("Employee"), to extend the Grant Deadline to effectuate the transfers described in Section 2.2 of the Agreement by a period of 45 days from the Grant
Deadline. The Grant Deadline is hereby extended to August 7, 2001.

|Date |  | June 18th |  | Signature  |  | /s/CLAUDIO PINKUS   
|---- |  | --------- |  | ---------- |  | --------------------
|     |  |           |  |            |  | Claudio Pinkus      
|     |  |           |  | Signature  |  | /s/CYNTHIA PEVEHOUSE
|     |  |           |  |            |  |                     
|     |  |           |  | Print Name |  |                     
|     |  |           |  |            |  | For Ask Jeeves, Inc.

---

QuickLinks
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7495

FLOYD NEWBY, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

EDDIE PEARSON, Warden; MR. PONTON, Assistant

Warden,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, District

Judge. (CA-97-48-AM)

Submitted: January 22, 1998 Decided: February 4, 1998

Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Floyd Newby, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Mark Ralph Davis, OFFICE OF THE

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant, a Virginia inmate, appeals the district court's

order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint under

28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A (West Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record

and the district court's opinion and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the

district court. Newby v. Pearson, CA-97-48-AM (E.D. Va. Sept. 29,

1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-1197
ROBERT HARLEY GANZE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION; KENNETH J. PURCELL; STEPHEN JOHNSON; MARIO LOPEZ; DARLENE ADAMS, Defendants - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. A lbert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-97-1623-A) Submitted: April 29, 1998 Decided: May 15, 1998 Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert Harley Ganze, Appellant Pro Se. Merrell B. Renaud, HAZEL & THOMAS, P.C., Falls Church, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Appellant appeals the dismissal of his action alleging numerous claims challenging the Defendants' withholding of federal income taxes from Appellant's pay. Our review of the record discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Ganze v. Computer Sciences Corp. , No. CA-97-1623-A (E.D. Va. Jan. 9, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
In The 

Court of Appeals 

Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07-15-00140-CV 

RAY WINN, APPELLANT 

 

V. 

 

SALLY LAWSON, APPELLEE 

 

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1 

Bell County, Texas 

Trial Court No. 74271, Honorable Jeanne Parker, Presiding 

 

July 11, 2018 

 

ORDER 

 

Before QUINN, C.J., and PIRTLE and PARKER, JJ. 

On or about June 15, 2018, appellee, Sally Lawson, notified this court that she had 

filed bankruptcy under Chapter 13 of the United States Bankruptcy Code in United States 

Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Missouri, Cause No. 17-42999. Appellee 

initiated the bankruptcy proceeding on November 3, 2017. 

Given the notice of bankruptcy and Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 8.2, this 

appeal is suspended until further order of this court. The parties are directed to take such 

action that is appropriate to advise the clerk of this court of any change in the status of 
2

appellant’s bankruptcy proceeding which would affect the status of this appeal, including 

but not limited to the filing of a Motion to Reinstate. 

Per Curiam
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES/OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the report of Medical Solutions Management Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), the undersigned Brian Lesperance, President and Treasurer (principal executive officer)and Kenneth
Fischer, Chief Financial Officer (principal accounting and finance officer) of the Company hereby certify, pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, that this Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 or other document authenticating,
acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906 Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|                   |  |  |  |                                                                                   
|------------------ |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 14, 2007 |  |  |  |                                                                                   
|                   |  | 
|                   |  |  |  | /s/ Brian Lesperance                                                              
|                   |  |  |  | Brian Lesperance President and Treasurer
(principal executive officer)            
|                   |  | 
|Date: May 14, 2007 |  |  |  |                                                                                   
|                   |  | 
|                   |  |  |  | /s/ Kenneth Fischer                                                               
|                   |  |  |  | Kenneth Fischer Chief Financial Officer (principal accounting and finance officer)
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Randy P. Giles, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-K of Coventry Health Care, Inc.;
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





| | 3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





| |  |  |  |                                                                 |  |  |  | 
| |  |  |  | --------------------------------------------------------------- |  |  |  | 
| |  |  |  | By: /s/ Randy P. Giles                                         
| |  |  |  | Randy P. Giles                                                  |  | 
| |  |  | 
| |  |  |  | Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |  | 
| |  |  | 
| |  |  |  | Date: April 30, 2013                                            |  |
# C_2015414EN.01001601.xml

| 14.12.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 414/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.12.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 414/16

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato (Italy) lodged on 11 September 2015 — Aeroporto Valerio Catullo di Verona Villafranca SpA v Società per l’Aeroporto Civile di Bergamo-Orio al Serio SpA (SACBO SpA)

(Case C-485/15)

(2015/C 414/19)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Referring court

Consiglio di Stato

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Aeroporto Valerio Catullo di Verona Villafranca SpA

Appellant:

Respondent: Società per l’Aeroporto Civile di Bergamo-Orio al Serio SpA (SACBO SpA)

Respondent:

Question referred

Question referred

Do the principles of the Treaty on European Union of non-discrimination, equal treatment, transparency, advertising and competition preclude provisions of national legislation such as the combined provisions of Article 10 of Law No 537/93, Articles 6, 7, 8 and 17 of Ministerial Decree No 521/1997, Article 17 of Decree Law No 67/97, Article 3(2) of Legislative Decree No 96/2005 and Article 11 of Decree Law No 216/2011 in conjunction with Article 6 of Decree Law No 78/2010, in so far as those national provisions may allow the grant of a forty-year concession for full airport operation to escape award by means of a public tendering procedure?

---