alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## R e q u e s t f

o r I n f o r m a t i o n

­ F A

A

­ 2 0 1 5

­ 2 0 1 8

9

­ A W A

­ A V S

­ 3 3 3 E x e m p t i o n s ( F A

A )

S e n t : F r i d a y

, A u g u s t 1 4

, 2 0 1 5 1 1 : 5 4 A M

T o : d a v i d @ i m a g e e f f e c t s

. c o m

D e a r M r

. H u n t :

T h i s l e t t e r i s t o i n f o r m y o u t h a t t h e f

o l l o w i n g i n f

o r m a t i o n i s m i s s i n g f r o m y

o u r p e t i t i o n ( D o c k

e t N o

. F A A

− 2 0 1 5

− 2 0 1 8 )

. T h i s i n f o r m a t i o n i s n e c e s s a r y f

o r t h e F e d e r a l A v i a t i o n A d m i n i s t r a t i o n ( F A A ) t o p r o c e s s y o u r p e t i t i o n

.

P r o v i d e a c o p y o f t h e M o t i o n P i c t u r e a n d T e l e v i s i o n O p e r a t i o n s M a n u a l ( M P T O M ) w h i c h i s r e q u i r e d b y O r d e r

8 9 0 0

. 1

, V o l u m e 3

, C h a p t e r 8

, S e c t i o n 1

. I f y o u w i s h f o r u s t o p r o c e e d w i t h o u t t h i s m a n u a l a n d r e m o v e

c l o s e d

‐ s e t f i l m i n g f r o m y

o u r p r o p o s e d o p e r a t i o n p l e a s e i n f o r m o f u s o f y

o u r i n t e n t i o n b y t h e r e q u e s t e d

r e s p o n s e d a t e l i s t e d b e l o w

.

P l e a s e s u b m i t t h e a d d i t i o n a l i n f o r m a t i o n ( n o n

‐ p r o p r i e t a r y ) t o y o u r d o c k e t a t w w w

. r e g u l a t i o n s

. g o v a n d s u b m i t a n y

p r o p r i e t a r y i n f

o r m a t i o n t o t h e F A A H e a d q u a r t e r s o r e l e c t r o n i c a l l y v i a e m a i l t o 3 3 3 e x e m p t i o n s @ f a a

. g o v

. I f y

o u w a n t

u s t o p r o c e s s y

o u r r e q u e s t a n y f u r t h e r

, w e m u s t r e c e i v e t h e i n f o r m a t i o n d e s c r i b e d a b o v

e b y 8 / 1 4 / 1 5

. I f w e d o n o t

r e c e i v e t h e i n f o r m a t i o n

, w e w i l l c l o s e t h e d o c k e t w i t h o u t n o t i f

y i n g y o u f u r t h e r

.

I f y o u h a v e a n y q u e s t i o n s

, p l e a s e f

e e l f r e e t o c o n t a c t m e a t ( 2 0 2 ) 2 6 7

­ 4 2 6 4

.

S i n c e r e l y

,

D a n N g o

F A A O f f i c e o f R u l e m a k i n g
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.1




           CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE AND FINANCIAL OFFICERS
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         Mario Mohar Ponce, as Chief Executive Officer of TFM, S.A. de C.V. and
Grupo Transportacion Ferroviaria Mexicana, S.A. de C.V. (the "Companies") and
Jacinto Marina Cortes, as Chief Financial Officer of the Companies, each hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

     (1) The Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Companies for the year ended
         December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
         on the date hereof (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements
         of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Companies.



                                        /s/ Mario Mohar Ponce
                                        Name:   Mario Mohar Ponce
                                        Title:  Chief Executive Officer
                                        Date:   June 30, 2003


                                        /s/ Jacinto Marina Cortes
                                        Name:   Jacinto Marina Cortes
                                        Title:  Chief Financial Officer
                                        Date:   June 30, 2003




This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Companies for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Companies and will be retained by the Companies and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Randall J. Richert, P.E., QEP 

Consultant- Air 

Billings Refinery 

PO. Box 30198 

Bi:lings, MT 59107-0198 

phone 406.255.2580 

fax 406.255.2621 

CERTIFIED MAIL #7004-2510-0006-5598-6224 

RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED 

July 26, 2005 

Ms. Trista Glazier ()If 

Montana Department of Environmental Quality /, ;·nn.5 

P.O. Box 200901 

Helena, MT 59620 

Dear Ms. Glazier: 

Re: Response to Request for Information, Regional Haze Rule and Best Available Retrofit 

.Technology 

In response to your request for information relative to the Regional Haze Rule and Best Available Retrofit 

Technology (BART), the ConocoPhillips Billings Refinery is submitting the attached table. 

The table lists the emission sources at the refinery that were constructed or reconstructed during the time 

period specified in your letter (between August 7, 1962 and August 7, 1977). Sources such as storage 

vessels (storage tanks) that emit only VOCs have not been included with this submittal. 

The table lists the Potential to Emit (PTE) for NOx, 802, and PM-10 for each source. Actual emissions 

,wo! ,~c;s th;:m these, hpc"l' i<:,P the ;.omission s()ur~9S I)ften operate at less than capacity andlor do [jot 

operate for periods of timb during the year. Actual emissions data can be provided, and is also 5UUlnlti5j 

on an annual basis to the DEQ. 

__ _ :.l .. _
 

- I: J - ­

Sincerely, 

Randall Richert 

Attachment 

cc wiatt.: 

Mr. Jim Hughes 

Montana Department of Environmental Quality 

Airport Industrial Park IP-9 

1371 Rimtop Drive 

Billings, MT 59105 
7/26/2005	 ConocoPhillips Billings Refinery
 

Billings, MT
 

Response to 5/26/05 DEQ request for BART-related information for Regional Haze 

Design S02 NOx PM-10 S02 NOx PM-10 

Duty, Mfr. Emission Emission Emission PTE, PTE, PTE, Currently 

Source Service Type Fuel CFthr Date Factor Factor Factor Ttyr Ttyr Ttyr Active? 

Fuel 

Gas/Nat. NoB-5 Steam Boiler Boiler	 Gas 144,000 1969 160 ppm 271.3 7.6 Note 1 171.1 4.8 dismantled 

Fuel j 

Gas/Nat. NoB-6 Steam ~oiterl Boiler	 Gas 144,000 1969 160 ppm 271.3 7.6 Note 1 171.1 4.8 dismantled 

Fuel
 

Gas/Nat.
 

H-10 NO.2 HDS ... 

Heater'	 Gas 19,000 1963 116.5 ppm 100 7.6 Note 2 8.3 0.6 Yes 

Fuel 

Gas/Nat. 

H-11 Debut Reboiler Heater Gas 30,000 1963 116.5 ppm 100 7.6 Note 2 13.1 1.0 Yes 

Fuel 

Gas/Nat. 

H-12 Main Fract Reboiler Heater Gas 55,000 1963116.5ppm 100 7.6 Note 2 24.1 1.8 Yes 

Fuel 

Gas/Nat. 

H-13 NO.2 Reformer Heater Gas 25,600 1963 116.5 ppm 100 7.6 Note 2 11.2 0.9 Yes 

Fuel 

Gas/Nat. 

H-14 No.2 Reformer Heater Gas 16,500 1963 116.5 ppm 100 7.6 Note 2· 7.2 0.5 Yes 

Fuel 

Gas/Nat. 

H-15 NO.1 Reformer Heater Gas 6,200 1963 160 ppm 100 7.6 Note 2 2.7 0.2 Yes 

Fuel 

Gas/Nat. 

H-16 Stabilizer Reboiler Heater Gas 16,910 1963 116.5 ppm 100 7.6 Note 2 7.4 0.6 Yes 

PTE= Potential to Emit 

S02= Sulfur Dioxide 

NOx= Nitrogen Oxides 

PM-10= Particulate Matter less than 10 microns 

'­
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Collective Bargaining Clauses: Layoff, Recall, and Work-Sharing Procedures

              																	Levine, Morton					,	Allison, Theodore E.					 and 	United States. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 						*Collective Bargaining Clauses: Layoff, Recall, and Work-Sharing Procedures : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 1189*,												Washington: 								U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 										February 1956,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/4484,			accessed on September 25, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
#### UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Oscar ALAVEZ, Appellant.

No. 04-3189.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: June 24, 2005.

Decided: July 14, 2005.

Susan T. Lehr, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Omaha, NE, for Appellee.

John J. Velasquez, Velasquez Law Offices, Omaha, NE, for Appellant.

Before MELLOY, MCMILLIAN, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Oscar Alavez appeals the 87-month sentence the district court1 imposed after he pleaded guilty to conspiring to distribute and possess with intent to distribute 500 grams or more of a methamphetamine mixture, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846. Alavez’s counsel has moved to withdraw and filed a brief under *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Counsel questions the reasonableness of the sentence, stating Alavez believes that his sentence is “extreme” and that the court should have been allowed to sentence him below the Guidelines range.

The district court indicated the sentence was based on its consideration of the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), and we cannot agree with Alavez that the sentence is extreme or unreasonable. *See United States v. Booker,*— U.S. -, ---, 125 S.Ct. 738, 764-66, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005) (sentencing courts must consult Guidelines and take them into account along with other § 3553(a) factors; § 3553(a) factors guide inquiry as appellate courts review sentences to determine whether they are unreasonable); *cf. United States v. Jones,*2 F.3d 827, 828-29 (8th Cir.1993) (finding 151-month sentence for conspiring to distribute phencyclidine not “excessive”).

Having reviewed the record under *Penson v. Ohio,*488 U.S. 75, 80, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues. Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and we affirm.

1

. The Honorable Laurie Smith Camp, United States District Judge for the District of Nebraska.
**CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**
 
 **PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 **EXHIBIT
32.1**
 
 Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned certifies that (1) this Annual
Report of CNL Retirement Properties, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (this "Report"), fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, and (2) the information contained in this Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition of the Company as of December 31,
2004 and 2003 and its results of operations for the three year period ended
December 31, 2004.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Date:
      March 9, 2005
    
    /s/
      Thomas J. Hutchison, IIIThomas
      J. Hutchison, IIIChief
      Executive Officer
White Sands National Park Service

Department of the Interior

White Sands National Monument

White Sands National Monument

White Sands National Monument

PO Box 1086

Holloman AFB, NM 88330

TEL: (575) 479-6124

www.nps.gov/whsa
Japanese
### Geology at the site of a proposed dam and reservoir on Power Creek near Cordova, Alaska

By: Don John Miller

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/cir136

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
EXHIBIT 4.2

                              CERTIFICATE OF TRUST

                         OF PECO ENERGY TRANSITION TRUST


     THIS Certificate of Trust of PECO Energy Transition Trust (the "Trust"),
dated as of June 23, 1998, is being fully executed and filed by the undersigned,
as trustees, to form a business trust under the Delaware Business Trust Act (12
Del. C. ss. 3801, et seq.).

     1. Name. The name of the business trust formed hereby is PECO Energy
Transition Trust.

     2. Delaware Trustee. The name and business address of the trustee of the
Trust with its principal place of business in the State of Delaware are First
Union Trust Company, National Association, One Rodney Square, 920 King Street,
First Floor, Wilmington, Delaware 19801, Attention: Corporate Trust
Administration.

     3. Effective Date. This Certificate of Trust shall be effective as of its
filing with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, being the trustees of the Trust, have
executed this Certificate of Trust as of the date first-above written.


DIANA MOY KELLY, not in her                  FIRST UNION TRUST COMPANY,
individual capacity, but solely as           NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, not in its
trustee of the Trust                         individual capacity, but solely as
                                             trustee of the Trust


/s/ Diana Moy Kelly
---------------------------------------
                                                 By: /s/ Edward L. Truitt, Jr.
                                                    ----------------------------
                                                 Name: Edward L. Truitt, Jr.
                                                 Title: Assistant Vice President

GEORGE SHICORA, not in his
individual capacity, but solely as
trustee of the Trust


/s/ George R. Shicora
---------------------------------------
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-7209
MICHAEL A. MAJETTE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus RONALD J. ANGELONE, Director; DOCTOR IBARRA; K. V. MCWATERS, Head Nurse; W. E. MARTIN, Chief, Internal Affairs Unit; FRED SCHILLING, Doctor, Health Services; RUFUS FLEMING, Regional Director, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-96-994-AM) Submitted: March 13, 1997 Decided: May 2, 1997 Before HALL, ERVIN, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael A. Majette, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Michael Majette, a Virginia inmate, appeals the districtcourt's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A(b)(1) (West Supp. Sept. 1996, Pamphlet 3). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Majette v. Angelone , No. CA-96-994-AM (E.D. Va. July 25, 1996). We dispensewith oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Before the Third Division,

March 20, 1943

No. 48118.

#### Protests 50604-K, etc., of Atlantic Coast Fisheries Corp. (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

It was stipulated that the frozen frogs’ legs in question are the same in all material respects as those the subject of *Pacific Trading Co.*v. *United States*(8 Cust. Ct. 221, C. D. 610). The claim at 10 percent under paragraph 1558 was therefore sustained.
(V. D. 63)

#### Camera Specialty Company, Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 2971.

(Decided January 17, 1958)

*Norman Katz*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Chief Judge:

This matter is before me on remand from classification proceedings decided by the third division of this court in *Camera Specialty Company, Inc.*v. *United States,*39 Cust. Ct. 409, Abstract 61166, and it has been submitted for decision on a written stipulation, reading as follows:

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between counsel for plaintiff and the Assistant Attorney General for the United States, concerning the merchandise referred to below, as follows:

> 1. Said merchandise consists of cameras and leather carrying cases which, pursuant to the principal [sic] set forth in the case of John P. Herber & Co., Inc. v. United States, G. D. 1519, are subject to appraisment [sic] separately according to the value of each class of articles.

> 2. At the time of exportation of such merchandise to the United States, the price at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade for exportation to the United States, was at the unit price of $10.15 per camera and $1.50 per leather carrying case, in United States currency, less the proportionate deductions from said unit prices and additions thereto for non-dutiable and dutiable charges as invoiced. The foreign value of such or similar merchandise is no higher.

> 3. The instant stipulation and remand is limited to that merchandise contained in eases marked GW 400 to GW 423 inclusive, entered under cover of Warehouse Entry No. 2971, dated July 30, 1953.

> 4. The instant remand may be deemed submitted for decision upon this stipulation.

*623On the agreed facts, I find export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for appraisement of the cameras and leather carrying cases in the cases marked GW 400 to GW 423, inclusive, on the invoices covered by the entry involved herein, as hereinabove identified, and that such statutory value is $10.15 per camera and $1.50 per leather carrying case, United States currency, less the proportionate deductions from said unit prices and additions thereto for nondutiable and dutiable charges, as invoiced, and I so hold. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from B.B.
Walker's Form 10-Q for the third quarter of fiscal 2000 and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000104218
<NAME> B.B. WALKER COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-28-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-29-2000
<CASH>                                               1
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,791
<ALLOWANCES>                                       595
<INVENTORY>                                      8,415
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                15,066
<PP&E>                                           8,132
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,786
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  16,540
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           12,593
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         83
<COMMON>                                         1,746
<OTHER-SE>                                         926
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    16,540
<SALES>                                         16,042
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                16,075
<CGS>                                           11,664
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   16,659
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     2
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   280
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 733
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1,319)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (1,319)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1,319)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (.76)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.76)


</TABLE>
(Reap. Dec. 9826)

#### Variable Condenser Corp. Globe Shipping Co., Inc. v. United States

Entry Nos. 828806, etc.

*540(Decided October 27, 1960)

Plaintiffs not represented by counsel.

*George Oochran Dowd,*Assistant Attorney General, for tbe defendant.

LawRence, Judge:

The records indicate that there was no appearance on behalf of plaintiffs when the appeals for a reappraisement enumerated on the schedule attached to and made part of this decision were called for hearing, and the cases were consequently ordered submitted by the court.

Rule 5 (a) of the rules of the court provides that—

> Tbe submission for decision of any ease shall be made in open court by tbe parties thereto or their attorneys, or by stipulation, or by written request to tbe court, or by the court on its own motion. Where the plaintiff, petitioner, or appellant, or his attorney, in a case does not appear when the same is called, and after the opposite party has had opportunity to present evidence on the issues, it may be deemed submitted and may be decided by the court on the record as it appears therein.

Accordingly, I have examined the record in the appeals before the court and find nothing therein which tends in any way to overcome the presumption of correctness which attaches to the decision of the appraiser. I find and hold, therefore, that the proper values of the merchandise are the values returned by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.