alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-2000
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  302,287
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,419
<INVENTORY>                                    116,557
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               452,225
<PP&E>                                         880,518
<DEPRECIATION>                                 439,593
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,322,287
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          200,517
<BONDS>                                        448,759
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        45,764
<OTHER-SE>                                     522,338
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,322,287
<SALES>                                        771,864
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               771,864
<CGS>                                          536,634
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  709,474
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,890
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              15,915
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 48,077
<INCOME-TAX>                                    19,231
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             28,846
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    28,846
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.69
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.69


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Certification of ChiefExecutive Officer and Principal Financial Officer**

**required by Rule 13a –14(b) or Rule15d – 14(b) of the Exchange Act**

** **

The certificationset forth below is being submitted to the Securities and Exchange Commission inconnection with AES Red Oak L.L.C’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for theperiod ended September 30, 2003 (the “Report”) for purposes of complyingwith Rule 13a -14(b) or Rule 15d – 14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934(the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of theUnited States Code.

 

A. W. Bergeron,the President and Pam Strunk, the Chief Financial Officer of AES Red Oak,L.L.C., each certifies that, to the best of his or her knowledge:

 

1.             theReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.             theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of AES Red Oak, L.L.C.

 

 
|                     November 14,  2003 | /s/ A.W. Bergeron                         |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                                                                                                            | Name: A.W.Bergeron President              |
|                                                                                                                                            |                                      |
|                                                                                                                                            |                                      |
|                     November 14,  2003 | /s/ Pam Strunk                            |   |
|                                                                                                                                            | Name: Pam Strunk  Chief Financial Officer |
|                                                                                                                                                 |                                           |        |  |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          75,205
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,033,164
<ALLOWANCES>                                   100,000
<INVENTORY>                                  2,329,475
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,475,861
<PP&E>                                       1,614,724
<DEPRECIATION>                                  34,515
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,316,058
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,421,146
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         8,114
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,643,801
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,316,058
<SALES>                                      2,633,409
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,633,409
<CGS>                                        2,146,707
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,146,707
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               536,282
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              57,588
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (95,436)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (95,436)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (95,436)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.12)
        

</TABLE>
### Reconnaissance of the geology and ground-water hydrology of the Laramie Basin, Wyoming, with special reference to the Laramie and Little Laramie River valleys

By: Robert Thomas Littleton

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/cir80

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 408 

Recognizing North Platte, Nebraska, as ‘‘Rail Town USA’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 31, 2008 

Mr. SMITH of Nebraska (for himself, Mr. BONNER, Mr. MORAN of Kansas, 

Mr. CRENSHAW, Mr. PICKERING, Mr. MCCARTHY of California, Mr. 

ROSKAM, Mr. MELANCON, Mr. LINCOLN DAVIS of Tennessee, Mr. ROSS, 

Mr. MARCHANT, Mr. SHUSTER, Mr. PRICE of Georgia, Mr. 

NEUGEBAUER, Ms. GRANGER, Mr. THORNBERRY, Mr. MICA, Mr. 

FORTENBERRY, Mr. TERRY, Mrs. MCMORRIS RODGERS, Ms. FOXX, Mr. 

WALZ of Minnesota, Ms. FALLIN, Mr. EHLERS, Mr. KNOLLENBERG, Mr. 

BAIRD, Mr. WALDEN of Oregon, Mrs. MUSGRAVE, Mr. MCHENRY, and 

Mr. SESSIONS) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Recognizing North Platte, Nebraska, as ‘‘Rail Town USA’’. 

Whereas the community of North Platte, Nebraska, in western Nebraska is located at the convergence of the North 

and South Platte Rivers and possesses a rich and vibrant 

history; 

Whereas the railroad has played a significant role in the history of the community; 

Whereas, on January 2, 1867, main line operations officially 

commenced in North Platte, Nebraska; 

mstockstill on PROD1PC62 with BILLS

2 

•HCON 408 IH 

Whereas trains were vital during our country’s war efforts, 

transporting troops, equipment, and supplies across the 

country; 

Whereas during World War II hundreds of citizens from 

North Platte, Nebraska, assembled at the local depot to 

greet troops passing through town by train and provide 

soldiers with food, coffee, and gifts; 

Whereas for 54 months between 1941 and 1946, millions of 

troops found a small bit of comfort when their trains 

stopped in North Platte, Nebraska; 

Whereas at the war’s peak 3,000 to 5,000 personnel were 

greeted daily, with North Platte, Nebraska, sometimes 

hosting up to 20 trains a day; 

Whereas Bailey Yard in North Platte, Nebraska, is the largest railroad classification yard in the world; 

Whereas Bailey Yard covers 2,850 acres, reaching a total 

length of 8 miles, and contains 315 miles of track; 

Whereas every 24 hours, Bailey Yard handles 10,000 railroad 

cars; and 

Whereas Mid-Plains Community College in North Platte, Nebraska, offers railroad-specific courses in order to enhance student preparation for possible employment in the 

railroad discipline: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That Congress recognizes North Platte, Ne3 braska, as ‘‘Rail Town USA’’. 

Æ 

mstockstill on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
# C_2017283EN.01003602.xml

| 28.8.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 283/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.8.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 283/36

---

Judgment of the General Court of 18 July 2017 — EDF Toruń v ECHA

(Case T-758/15) (1)

1

((REACH - Fee for registration of a substance - Reduction granted to SMEs - Error in the declaration relating to the size of the enterprise - Decision imposing an administrative charge - Recommendation 2003/361/EC - Legitimate expectations - Proportionality - Calculation criteria of the amount of the administrative charge))

(2017/C 283/54)

Language of the case: Polish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: EDF Toruń SA (Toruń, Poland) (represented by: K. Sienkiewicz, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Chemicals Agency (represented by: J.-P. Trnka, C. Schultheiss and M. Heikkilä, acting as Agents, and C. Garcia Molyneux, lawyer)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU, seeking first, the annulment of Decision SME(2015) 4950 of the ECHA of 3 November 2015 which states that the applicant does not fulfil the conditions to receive a reduction of the fee for small enterprises and imposing an administrative charge on it and, second, the annulment of invoice No 10054011 issued by the ECHA following the adoption of Decision SME(2015) 4950.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The General Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders EDF Toruń S.A. to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders EDF Toruń S.A. to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 68, 22.2.2016.

1

---
(Reap. Dec. 8815)

#### Herman H. Sticht Co. Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 843205, etc.

*670(Decided May 29, 1957)

*Barnes. Richardson & Colburn*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Lawrence, Judge:

When the appeals for a reappraisement enumerated in the schedule, attached to and made part of this decision, were called for hearing, plaintiff submitted said cases on the record consisting of the official papers.

A review thereof discloses nothing which would tend in any way to overcome the presumption of correctness which attaches to the decision of the appraiser. I find and hold, therefore, that the proper values of the merchandise the subject of said appeals are the values returned by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
No. 39092.

#### Protest 920200-G of Mr. Coppock (New York).

Opinion by

McClelland, P. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the chamois leather in question was held dutiable at 20 percent under paragraph 1530 (c) and T. D. 48316 as claimed.
Exhibit 12 (a)

                             BNP U.S. FUNDING L.L.C.

                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

                          (in thousands, except ratios)


                                                          For the Year Ended
                                                           December 31, 2003
                                                           -----------------
Net income                                                     $22,759
                                                               =======
Fixed charges:
      Audit fees                                                    49
      Trustee fees                                                 149
      Administrative and consulting fees                         1,235
                                                               -------
Total fixed charges                                              1,433
                                                               -------
Earnings before fixed charges                                  $24,192
                                                               -------
Fixed charges, as above                                          1,433
                                                               -------
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                               16.88
                                                               -------
# C_2016410EN.01003503.xml

| 7.11.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 410/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.11.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 410/35

---

Order of the General Court of 14 September 2016 — Makhlouf v Council

(Case T-706/15) (1)

1

(2016/C 410/59)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 38, 1.2.2016.

1

---
No. 6161.

#### EMILE L. SCHLIEDER vs. J. VIC. LECLERC.

Syllabus.

Not only the principal of th^ mortgage note bnt also the demand for attorneys’ fees stipulated therein must be considered in determining whether or not the appeal lies to this Court.

■Appeal from the Civil District Court, Parish of Orleans, Division “A,” No. 100,794. Hon. T. '0. W. Ellis, Judge.

Sullivan & Landry, for plaintiff and appellee;

J. B. Rosser, for appellant.

W. J. Waguespack and Charles I. Denechaud, attorneys.

His Honor, EMILE GODCHAUX,

rendered the opinion and decree of the Court, as follows:

Appellant appeals from .a judgment dissolving his injunction directed against a writ of executory process issued at appellee’s instance to enforce the payment of a mortgage note of $2,000.00 and 2 per cent thereof as attorney’s fees stipulated in the act of mortgage.

The appellee has moved that the appeal be transferred to the Supreme Court under Act 56 of 1904 on the ground that the sum involved exceeds $2,000.00. The motion is. well-grounded, since in determining the jurisdiction of this Court on appeal, the attorneys’ fees of 2 per cent on the amount of the note must be added to the principal of the note in fixing the amount in dispute. .

Myer vs. Stahr, 35 An., 57.

It is accordingly ordered that this appeal be transferred to the Supreme Court upon the appellant or his .attorney of record making out and filing with the Clerk of this *33Court, on or before tbe 24th day of November, 1914, his affidavit that the .appeal herein was not taken for the purpose of delay, and further upon said appellant lodging with the Clerk of the Supreme Court, on or before the 10th day of December, 1914, a full and complete trans-script of this ease, made and certified to in the manner and form required by the rules of said Court for transcripts taken directly to that 'Court, together with a certified copy of this opinion and decree and the affidavit herein referred to, all costs incurred in this Court to be taxed against the appellant.

Opinion and decree, November 9, 1914.

Appeal transferred.
November 14, 2016

Mr. Jason Forte

Sky-Futures USA Inc

914 Main Street, Unit 2104

Houston, TX 77002

Re: FAA-2014-0641

Dear Mr. Forte:

This letter is to provide notification that we have reviewed your petition for exemption, and 

have determined that we will continue to process your petition.

As referenced in the June 22, 2016, letter posted to your docket at www.regulations.gov, we 

are reviewing pending Section 333 petitions to determine if the recently-issued regulation, 

Operation and Certification of Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems, Title 14, Code of Federal 

Regulations, Part 107 (www.faa.gov/uas) will satisfy your request. We have determined that 

your request requires further regulatory relief (Tier 3), and we will continue working on your 

petition for exemption.

We will advise you of the agency’s final decision on your petition as soon as possible. If you 

have any questions regarding your petition, please contact me at 333exemptions@faa.gov.

Sincerely,

/s/

Dan Ngo

Program Analyst
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
EL PASO, TEXAS

DORIAN KYLE SERMON

,

Appellant,

v.

MARISOL HERNANDEZ

,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 20

- 00071

- CV

Appeal from the

383rd District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 2018DCM0750)

O R D E R

On April 9, 2020, the Clerk of the Court sent Appellant a second notice that the $205 case

filing fee was past due. The notice requested payment of the fee and informed Appellant that failure

to make payment could be a ground for dismiss ing this appeal for want of prosecution. Following

the filing of the reporter ’ s record and the clerk ’ s record, the Clerk of the Court, on June 24, 2020,

sent Appellant an additional notice stating that neither an A ppellant ’ s B rief or a motion for

extension of time had been filed and that we intended to dismiss this case for want of prosecution

absent a response from Appellant within 10 days.2

On July 7, 2020, Appellant filed a response requesting more time to pay the case filing fee

due to financial difficulties relat ed to the ongoing COVID

- 19 situation. Appellant has since paid

the case filing fee. However, to date no Appellant ’ s Brief has been filed in this appeal , nor has

Appellant provided an explanation for not filing an Appellant ’ s Brief.

Pursuant to Section 3(a) of the Texas Supreme Court’s Twenty

- Second Emergency Order

Regarding the COVID

- 19 State of Di s aster, Misc. Docket No. 20

- 9095 (Tex. Aug. 6, 2020), this

Court may modify certain deadlines in response to concerns related to COVID

- 19. Given that

Appellant ha s indicated that COVID

- related issues may be causing a delay, we exercise our

authority under the Emergency Order to extend the deadline to file a brief.

Therefore, we GRANT Appellant an additional 30 days from the date of this order to file

a brief. This extension is FINAL and NO FURTHER EXTENSIONS OF TIME WILL BE

CONSIDERED ABSENT JUST CAUSE . Failure to timely file this brief may result in this case

being dismissed , without further notice, for want of prosecution and/or failure to comply with an

order of this Court. See T EX .R.A PP .P. 42.3(b), (c).

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 3RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER , 20 20

.

PER CURIAM

Before Alley, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.
Exhibit
32.1











CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350)








In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Walgreen Co., an Illinois corporation
(the "Company"), on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended May 31, 2009 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Greg D. Wasson, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.














/s/ Greg D.
Wasson


Greg D.
Wasson


Chief
Executive Officer


Dated:  June
25, 2009





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Walgreen Co. and will be retained by Walgreen Co. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Case No. 14,682.

#### UNITED STATES v. BURCH.

[1 Cranch, C. C. 36.] 1

Circuit Court. District of Columbia.

July Term, 1801.

Internal Revenue — Selling Liquor without License — Indictment—Sale bt Wife.

The day laid in an indictment for selling whiskey is not material. Selling by the wife, with the knowledge and assent of the husband, is the selling of the husband.

Indictment for retailing whiskey without license.

THE COURT

was of opinion that the day is not material if the fact be proved to be committed before the indictment found. That the selling by the wife, with the knowledge and assent of the husband, is the selling of the husband.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-6708

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

ARTHUR ALLEN HALEY,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge.

(CA-00-906-2-18)

Submitted: August 27, 2003 Decided: September 10, 2003

Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit

Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Arthur Allen Haley, Appellant Pro Se. Miller Williams Shealy, Jr.,

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, South Carolina,

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Arthur Allen Haley seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000).

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Haley

has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a

constitutional right. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, ,

123 S. Ct. 1029, 1039 (2003). Accordingly, we deny a certificate

of appealability and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)

(2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED