alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 316 Received in Senate (RDS)]

  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 316

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 12, 2008

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
        Providing for a conditional adjournment of the House of 
 Representatives and a conditional recess or adjournment of the Senate.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That when the House adjourns on the legislative day of Thursday, March 
13, 2008, or Friday, March 14, 2008, on a motion offered pursuant to 
this concurrent resolution by its Majority Leader or his designee, it 
stand adjourned until 2 p.m. on Monday, March 31, 2008, or until the 
time of any reassembly pursuant to

              

 section 2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first; and 
that when the Senate recesses or adjourns on any day from Thursday, 
March 13, 2008, through Friday, March 28, 2008, on a motion offered 
pursuant to this concurrent resolution by its Majority Leader or his 
designee, it stand recessed or adjourned until noon on Monday, March 
31, 2008, or such other time on that day as may be specified in the 
motion to recess or adjourn, or until the time of any reassembly 
pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs 
first.
    Sec. 2.  The Speaker of the House and the Majority Leader of the 
Senate, or their respective designees, acting jointly after 
consultation with the Minority Leader of the House and the Minority 
Leader of the Senate, shall notify the Members of the House and the 
Senate, respectively, to reassemble at such place and time as they may 
designate if, in their opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 12, 2008.

            Attest:

                                            LORRAINE C. MILLER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Exhibit
32.2
 
 
 
 Certification
of CFO Pursuant to
 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350,
 As
Adopted Pursuant to
 Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of U.S. Energy Corp. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Robert Scott Lorimer,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:
 
 (1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 
 
 
 
 /s/  Robert
      Scott LorimerRobert
      Scott Lorimer,Chief
      Financial OfficerNovember
      6, 2009
 
 
 This
certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.
 
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
U.S. Energy Corp. and will be retained by U.S. Energy Corp. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed July 15, 2014.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-13-00776-CR

NO. 14-13-00777-CR

AKILLEON LARAN CHASE, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 174th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. 1338722 & 1338723

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant appeals two convictions for aggravated robbery. Appellant’s 

appointed counsel filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly 

frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirement of Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), presenting a professional evaluation of the record 

and demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See High v. 

State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978).
2

A copy of counsel’s brief was delivered to appellant. Appellant was advised 

of the right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se response. See Stafford 

v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 512 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). At appellant’s request, the 

record was provided to him. On June 16, 2014, appellant filed a pro se response to 

counsel’s brief.

We have carefully reviewed the record, counsel’s brief, and appellant’s 

response, and agree the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. Further, we 

find no reversible error in the record. A discussion of the brief would add nothing 

to the jurisprudence of the state. We are not to address the merits of each claim 

raised in an Anders brief or a pro se response when we have determined there are 

no arguable grounds for review. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 827–28 

(Tex. Crim. App. 2005). 

Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Boyce, Busby, and Wise.

Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
Exhibit 31.1

         I, Roger S. Mertz, certify that:

         1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of SonomaWest Holdings,
Inc.;

         2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

         3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

         4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

                  (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

                  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation;

                  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely
to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting; and

         5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

                  (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

                  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting.

Date: February 11, 2005


/s/ Roger S. Mertz
-----------------------
Roger S. Mertz
Chairman of the Board
No. 44255.

#### Protest 965817-G of Butler Bros. (Seattle).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of Rockinghamware earthenware the same as that passed upon in *Butler*v. *United States*(4 Cust. Ct. 120, C. D. 303). The claim at 25 percent under paragraph 210 was therefore sustained.
Exhibit 10.1

                                                                         Summary
                                                                         -------



Comprehensive  Credit  Facility  Agreement of Maximum Amount Entered Between the
Company and Agricultural Bank

Main contents:

>>   Contract number: (Shenzhen Longgang Nongyin Shouzi No.200502370001;
>>   Maximum amount for credit facilities to be provided: RMB200 million;
>>   Term: from May 20th, 2005 to May 20, 2006;
>>   Interest rate of loan shall be subject to each loan  agreement/contract  to
     be signed;
>>   Purpose: working capital;
>>   Adjustment of credit can be made by Agricultural  Bank under the any of the
     following:
     |X|  The Company suffers severe operational risk or its financial situation
          severely deteriorates;
     |X|  Guarantor's  payment ability is obviously weakened or value of pledged
          collaterals decreases obviously;
     |X|  Occurrence  of other  instances  which  make  Agricultural  Bank think
          adjustment of credit facility is necessary.
>>   Breach of contract  penalty:  adjustment of credit,  cancellation of unused
     credit,  imposition  of punitive  interest,  demand  prepayment of loan and
     other measures;
>>   Special  term:  The  Company  undertakes  that it  authorizes  Lender to go
     through  the  formalities  and  procedures  required  for  obtaining  title
     certificate  for BAK  Industrial  Park and shall  complete the afore stated
     formalities  and  procedures  before the end of Sep,  2005 and pledge it to
     Agricultural Bank in time.

Terms  that have been  omitted:  definition;  credit  types used for the line of
credit;  the guarantee of the loan under this Agreement;  adjustment of the line
of credit;  dispute  settlement;  miscellaneous;  effectiveness;  validity;  and
attention.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. YANG WANG, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 03-10312.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 12, 2005.*

Decided Sept. 16, 2005.

Patrick J. Smith, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Saipan, MP, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

G. Anthony Long, Esq., Saipan, MP, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: REINHARDT, RYMER, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.

*

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Yang Wang appeals his guilty-plea conviction and 57-month sentence imposed for distribution and possession with intent to distribute a controlled substance, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(C).

Pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Wang has filed a brief and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record, stating there are no grounds for relief. No pro se supplemental brief has been filed.

We have conducted an independent review of the record pursuant to *Penson v. Ohio,*488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988). We affirm the conviction. We remand the sentence for further proceedings consistent with *United States v. Ameline,*409 F.3d 1073, 1084-85 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc).

Counsel’s motion to withdraw as counsel on appeal is denied.

The conviction is AFFIRMED, and the sentence is REMANDED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
June 1, 1961

No. 65744.

#### Morris Shoenthal, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 328085-K.

Plaintiff’s application for rehearing granted.
No. 46405.

#### Protests 774255-G, etc., of Harry A. Ahrens & Bros. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Walker, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
Exhibit 8.1  SUBSIDIARY
  
  COUNTRY OF INCORPORATION1.
  
  Westelcom
  
  Russian Federation2.
  
  GlobalTel
  
  Russian Federation3.
  
  Globus Telecom
  
  Russian Federation4.
  
  Zebra Telecom
  
  Russian Federation5.
  
  MTs NTT
  
  Russian Federation6.
  
  Kostars
  
  Russian Federation7.
  
  DP Pansionat Malakhit
  
  Russian Federation8.
  
  Incom
  
  Russian Federation9.
  
  InfoTeKS Taganrog
  Telecom
  
  Russian Federation10.
  
  RTComm.RU
  
  Russian Federation11.
  
  RTComm-Sibir
  
  Russian Federation12.
  
  RTComm-Yug
  
  Russian Federation13.
  
  BASHRTCOMM
  
  Russian Federation
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 335 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 335

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. USE OF CAPITOL GROUNDS FOR 100TH ANNIVERSARY CELEBRATION OF 
              ALPHA KAPPA ALPHA SORORITY, INCORPORATED.

    (a) In General.--Alpha Kappa Alpha Sorority, Incorporated (in this 
resolution referred to as the ``sponsor''

              

), shall be permitted to sponsor a public event (in this resolution 
referred to as the ``event'') on the Capitol Grounds to celebrate the 
100th anniversary of Alpha Kappa Alpha Sorority, Incorporated.
    (b) Date of Event.--The event shall be held on July 17, 2008, or on 
such other date as the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the 
Committee on Rules and Administration of the Senate jointly designate.

SEC. 2. TERMS AND CONDITIONS.

    (a) In General.--Under conditions to be prescribed by the Architect 
of the Capitol and the Capitol Police Board, the event shall be--
            (1) free of admission charge and open to the public; and
            (2) arranged not to interfere with the needs of Congress.
    (b) Expenses and Liabilities.--The sponsor shall assume full 
responsibility for all expenses and liabilities incident to all 
activities associated with the event.

SEC. 3. EVENT PREPARATIONS.

    Subject to the approval of the Architect of the Capitol, the 
sponsor is authorized to erect upon the Capitol Grounds such stage, 
sound amplification devices, and other related structures and equipment 
as may be required for the event.

SEC. 4. ENFORCEMENT OF RESTRICTIONS.

    The Capitol Police Board shall provide for enforcement of the 
restrictions contained in section 5104(c) of title 40, United States 
Code, concerning sales, advertisements, displays, and solicitations on 
the Capitol Grounds, as well as other restrictions applicable to the 
Capitol Grounds, in connection with the event.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 4, 2008.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
110th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                            H. CON. RES. 335

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

  Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for a celebration of the 
     100th anniversary of Alpha Kappa Alpha Sorority, Incorporated.
```
<PAGE>   1


                           [ERNST & YOUNG LETTERHEAD]


                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 333-31130) pertaining to the Fundtech Ltd. 1999 Employee Option
Plan, the Fundtech Ltd. 1997 Stock Option Plan for Fundtech Corporation, the
1997 Israeli Share Option Plan, the Fundtech Ltd 1996 Employee Stock Option
Plan and the Fundtech Ltd. Directors Option Plan, of our report, dated February
7, 2000, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedules of
Fundtech Ltd. included in its Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
December 31, 1999.


Tel Aviv, Israel
March 29, 2000

                                                KOST, FORER and GABBAY
                                         Certified Public Accountants Israel)
                                        A Member of Ernst & Young International
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           3,224                   2,003
<SECURITIES>                                       350                     200
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,673                   9,442
<ALLOWANCES>                                       170                     386
<INVENTORY>                                        147                     759
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 8,074                  15,405
<PP&E>                                           9,921                  14,969
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,828                   4,341
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  20,155                  99,256
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,447                  12,271
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                        17,170                  42,285
<OTHER-SE>                                       (912)                   8,846
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    20,155                  99,256
<SALES>                                         28,902                  47,221
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                28,902                  47,221
<CGS>                                           12,031                  18,500
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   24,590                  40,906
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    35                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 344                     701
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,128                  45,474
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,564                  20,150
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,459                   9,852
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.30                    1.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.30                    0.96



</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHBIT 23.1



                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 Nos. 333-60997 and 333-61007) of Hastings Entertainment, Inc. of our
report dated March 22, 2002, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements and schedules of Hastings Entertainment, Inc. as of January 31, 2002
and 2001 and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders'
equity and cash flows for the years then ended, included in the Annual Report
(Form 10-K) for the year ended January 31, 2002.



                                           /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Fort Worth, Texas
April 8, 2002
---

Exhibit 99.21

Summary of Guaranty Contract of Maximum Amount ( the Contract) Entered into by and between Shenzhen BAK Battery Co., Ltd, (the Guarantor) and Tianjin Branch, Shanghai Pudong Development Bank (the Creditor)
on September 28, 2009

Main contents:

- Guaranty Contract number: ZB7703200988020601;
- Maximum amount of loan to be provided: RMB 30 million;
- Term: from September 28, 2009 to August 31, 2010;
- Shenzhen BAK Battery Co., Ltd undertakes to assume joint and several liabilities for
BAK International (Tianjin) Limited (the Obligor)s indebtedness towards Shanghai Pudong Development Bank under this Contract from September 28, 2009 to August 31, 2010.

- Guaranty Responsibility: The guaranty under this Contract shall be
guaranty with joint and several liabilities. The guarantor is obligated to pay
off the debt in the event the obligor is unable to pay off the debt (including
the creditor declares the debt becomes mature in advance to its original expiry
date due to default of the obligor or the guarantor).
- Scope of Guaranty:The guaranty shall cover all of the loan principal, interest, penalty interest, breach of
contract compensation, damages, undertaking fee and all the expenses such as litigation cost, lawyers fee, notification cost and public notice cost etc. which is incurred to the Creditor in realizing its creditors right.
- Guaranty period: The guaranty period is from the effective date of this Contract to two years after the expiry of the term of relevant agreements entered into under the Contract.

Headlines of the articles omitted:

- Termination and explanation
- Payment on demand
- Declaration and undertaking of the Guarantor
- Obligations of the Guarantor
- Amendment and termination of the Contract
- Disputation settlement
- Validity

---
Case No. 6,937.

#### HURST v. RODNEY.

[1 Wash. C. C. 375.] 1

Circuit Court, D. Pennsylvania.

April Term, 1806.

Covenants Running with the Land.

What will be considered a covenant, running with the land, and binding on the party in possession; although such party has not executed the deed, conveying the same to him.

[Cited in Mohler’s Appeal, 8 Pa. St. 27; Crawford v. Witherbee, 77 Wis. 429, 46 N. W. 547.]

[In Case No. 6,938 a rule to set aside an execution upon this judgment was heard.]

This was an action of covenant, brought against defendant for many years ground j ent, due upon a lot of ground, conveyed by plaintiff to one Perkins, in fee, and by him conveyed by indenture to the defendant, subject to the ground rent. The declaration states these deeds, and the entry of defendant, and the non-payment of rents, due since her possession under the deed to her. The deed to the defendant, not being executed by the defendant; her counsel contended, that it was not her deed, and that she could not be sued on it.

1

 [Originally published from the MSS. of Hon. Bushrod Washington. Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States, under the supervision of Richard Peters, Jr., Esq.]

BY THE COURT.

The defendant is bound by the covenant to pay the rent, in the first deed to Perkins, which runs with the land, so long as it is retained by the defendant. Verdict for plaintiff.
No. 53812.

protests 131063-K, etc. (New York).

#### Austin, Nichols *&*Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

For the reasons stated in *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C. D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
No. 53259.

#### A. Simon Baby Carriages, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 145081-K (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

The protest was dismissed.