alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 89 (Wednesday, May 9, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 26443]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-8830]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration <greek-i> 10860 and <greek-i> 10861]


Vermont Disaster <greek-i> VT-00002

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Administrative declaration of a 
disaster for the State of Vermont dated 05/01/2007.
    Incident: Severe Storms and Flooding.
    Incident Period: 04/15/2007 through 04/16/2007.
    Effective Date: 05/01/2007.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 07/02/2007.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 02/01/2008

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to:
    U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing And Disbursement 
Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the Administrator's disaster declaration, applications for disaster 
loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally 
announced locations.
    The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected 
by the disaster:

Primary Counties:
    Rutland.
Contiguous Counties:
    Vermont, Addison, Bennington, Windsor. New York, Washington.

    The Interest Rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                               Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homeowners With Credit Available Elsewhere.................        5.750
Homeowners Without Credit Available Elsewhere..............        2.875
Businesses With Credit Available Elsewhere.................        8.000
Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives Without Credit        4.000
 Available Elsewhere.......................................
Other (Including Non-Profit Organizations) With Credit             5.250
 Available Elsewhere.......................................
Businesses And Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit             4.000
 Available Elsewhere.......................................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 10860 B 
and for economic injury is 10861 0. The States which received an EIDL 
Declaration <greek-i> are Vermont and New York.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

    Dated: May 1, 2007.
Steven C. Preston,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. E7-8830 Filed 5-8-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
<SEQUENCE>5
<FILENAME>rcert322-033104.txt
                                                                Exhibit 32.2



                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                              AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
         SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



               In connection with the Quarterly Report of Uptowner Inns, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2004
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




/s/ David Robinson
Chief Financial Officer
May 13, 2004
No. 40422.

#### Protest 959954-G of J. S. Hoffman Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

On the authority of *Locatelli*v. *United States*(T. D. 49389) the court sustained the protest.
<SEQUENCE>4
<FILENAME>certification 123101.txt
                                                           Exhibit 99.2



Insert for Below Signatures on Form 10-Q (12-31-01)


                                     CERTIFICATION



               Pursuant to 18 U.S.C., Section 1350, the undersigned officer
of Uptowner Inns, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies, to such officer's
knowledge, that the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
Quarter Ended December 31, 2001 (the "Report") fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable,
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated:  ___________              ____________________________
                                             Name:  /s/ Carl E. Midkiff
                                             Title:     Chief Executive Officer




                                      CERTIFICATION



               Pursuant to 18 U.S.C., Section 1350, the undersigned officer
of Uptowner Inns, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies, to such officer's
knowledge, that the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
Quarter Ended December 31, 2001 (the "Report") fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable,
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated:  ___________              ____________________________
                                             Name:  /s/ David Robinson
                                             Title:     Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from B.B.
Walker's Form 10-Q for the third quarter of fiscal 1998 and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000104218
<NAME> B.B. WALKER COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-01-1998
<CASH>                                               1
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,436
<ALLOWANCES>                                       560
<INVENTORY>                                      9,791
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                17,282
<PP&E>                                           8,145
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,459
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  19,096
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           12,222
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         83
<COMMON>                                         1,721
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,099
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    19,096
<SALES>                                         21,128
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                21,335
<CGS>                                           15,769
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   21,183
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     2
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   192
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 812
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (331)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (331)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (331)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.19)
        

</TABLE>
No. 42018.

#### Protest 774831-G of Wm. Steinmeyer Co. (Milwaukee).

Opinion by

McClelland, P. J.

On the record presented the protest was overruled.
1The Honorable Michael J. Davis, United States District Judge for the District

of Minnesota.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 01-1757

___________

Melissa L. Land, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* District of Minnesota.

Washington County, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellee. *

___________

 Submitted: October 3, 2001

 Filed: October 4, 2001 

___________

Before WOLLMAN, Chief Judge, BOWMAN, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Melissa Land appeals the District Court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment

in her action under the “association” provision of the Americans with Disabilities Act.

See 42 U.S.C. § 12112(b)(4) (1994) (unlawful discrimination includes “excluding or

otherwise denying equal jobs or benefits to a qualified individual because of the known

disability of an individual with whom the qualified individual is known to have a

relationship or association”). Having conducted a de novo review, see Mole v.
-2-

Buckhorn Rubber Prods., Inc. 165 F.3d 1212, 1214 (8th Cir.) (standard of review),

cert. denied, 528 U.S. 821 (1999), we affirm. 

We agree with the District Court that Land failed to establish a prima facie case

of association discrimination. See Hilburn v. Murata Elecs. N. Am., Inc., 181 F.3d

1220, 1230-31 (11th Cir. 1999) (listing elements of a prima facie case). We also

conclude that the District Court did not abuse its discretion when it denied Land’s

motions for discovery sanctions. 

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 286 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 286

 Expressing the sense of Congress that Earl Lloyd should be recognized 
   and honored for breaking the color barrier and becoming the first 
African-American to play in the National Basketball Association League 
                             58 years ago.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 29, 2008

  Mr. Moran of Virginia (for himself, Mr. Scott of Virginia, Mr. Tom 
  Davis of Virginia, Mr. Payne, Mr. Meeks of New York, Mr. Wolf, Mr. 
 Conyers, Mr. Clay, Mr. Towns, Ms. Kilpatrick, Ms. Moore of Wisconsin, 
     Mr. Rush, Mr. Hastings of Florida, Mr. Davis of Illinois, Mr. 
 Jefferson, Mr. Cleaver, Mr. Oberstar, Mr. Markey, Mr. Hall of Texas, 
 Mr. Shays, Mr. Butterfield, Mr. Al Green of Texas, Mr. Hinojosa, Mr. 
 Delahunt, Mr. Watt, Mr. Ellison, Mr. Pallone, Mr. Johnson of Georgia, 
 Mr. Braley of Iowa, Mr. Scott of Georgia, Ms. Watson, Ms. Slaughter, 
Mr. Larson of Connecticut, Mr. Kucinich, Mr. Ross, Mr. Van Hollen, Mr. 
    Cardoza, Mr. Serrano, and Mr. McGovern) submitted the following 
concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight 
                         and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing the sense of Congress that Earl Lloyd should be recognized 
   and honored for breaking the color barrier and becoming the first 
African-American to play in the National Basketball Association League 
                             58 years ago.

Whereas Earl Lloyd was born in Alexandria, Virginia on April 3, 1928;
Whereas Earl Lloyd first developed his passion for basketball at the city of 
        Alexandria's segregated Parker-Gray High School;
Whereas Earl Lloyd was drafted by the NBA in 1950 as a ninth round pick by the 
        Washington Capitols;
Whereas on October 31, 1950, Earl Lloyd became the first African-American to 
        play in the NBA;
Whereas Earl Lloyd dissolved the color barrier in the NBA 3 years after Jackie 
        Robinson had done the same in baseball;
Whereas Earl Lloyd proudly put his professional career on hold and served in the 
        Army for 2 years before returning to the NBA;
Whereas Earl Lloyd played 560 NBA games and won a championship before retiring 
        in 1960;
Whereas in 2003, Earl Lloyd was inducted into the Naismith Memorial Basketball 
        Hall of Fame; and
Whereas the newly constructed basketball court at T.C. Williams in his home town 
        of Alexandria was named in his honor: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of Congress that Earl Lloyd should be recognized 
and honored for breaking the color barrier and becoming the first 
African-American to play in the National Basketball Association League 
58 years ago.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

NAJEE EURE,

Petitioner

v.

PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF 

PROBATION AND PAROLE VS. 

ATTORNEY GENERAL JOSH SHAPIRO,

Respondents

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 140 EM 2018

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 6th day of February, 2019, the Application for Leave to File 

Original Process is GRANTED, and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus and/or 

Extraordinary Relief is DENIED.
July 25, 1938

No. 39111.

Suit 4143.

#### *United States*v. *Monteverde & Parodi, Inc., Parodi Erminio & Co.*

Abstract 36753 reversed.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-56,883-12

IN RE LEROY HENDERSON, Relator

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS

CAUSE NOS. 763935-E AND 763936-F IN THE 263RD DISTRICT COURT

FROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Relator has filed a motion for leave to file a writ of mandamus pursuant to the original

jurisdiction of this Court. In it, he contends that he filed applications for writs of habeas corpus in

the 263rd District Court of Harris County, that more than 35 days have elapsed, and that the

applications have not yet been forwarded to this Court.

In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. Respondent, the District Clerk of Harris

County, is ordered to file a response, which may be made by submitting the record(s) on such habeas

corpus application(s), submitting a copy of a timely filed order which designates issues to be

investigated (see McCree v. Hampton, 824 S.W.2d 578, 579 (Tex. Crim. App. 1992)), or stating that
-2-

Relator has not filed application(s)for a writ of habeas corpus in Harris County. Should the response

include an order designating issues, proof of the date the district attorney’s office was served with

the habeas application(s)shall also be submitted with the response. This application for leave to file

a writ of mandamus shall be held in abeyance until Respondent has submitted the appropriate

response. Such response shall be submitted within 30 days of the date of this order.

Filed: August 6, 2014

Do not publish
No. 54928.

#### Vintage Wines, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 130508-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of Lancers Rose Wine in bottles or jugs similar in all material respects to that the subject of Abstract 53224, the claim of the plaintiff was. sustained.
02/07/2011 15:5G FAX 2024935142 FAA 

^'^'^ * QMS 21001/002 

:>PARTMENTOF 

•/N3P0RWI0N 

UNITED STATES D*:PARTM£^ T OJ- TRANSFOR I ATIO N :, CPFRAT'ONS 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, D.C, '-j FEB - 1 P U: 05 

IN THIi IVTATTER OF 

AMERICAN EAGLE AIRLINES, INC, 

FAA DOCKET NO. CP09SWOOO(i 

FAA Case No. 2008SW210288 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

Judt;c Richai'dC. Goodwin 

iECEiVED 

JAN 2 5 2011 

-^??4RING DOCKET 

WITHDRAWAL OF NOTICE OF APPEAL 

Comcsj now the Admini.strator, through his Regional Counsel, and withdraws ihc 

Notice of Appeal filed December 23, 2010, in ihc above numbered and entitled matter, 

pursuant to 14 C.F.R. {?l3.233(d)(2) of the Rules of Practice For FAA Civil Penalty 

Actions. 

DAVID L. DONNCI.L 

Acting Regional Counsel 

Southwest Region 

By: 

RenalV!. Price, Senior Attorney 

Safety Enforcement Branch 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Fort Worth, TX 76193-0007 

(817) 222-5068 FAX (817) 222-5945/6 

e-mail: rena.m.phce@faa.gov 

Dated: January 19,2011 
02/07/2011 15:5G FAX 2024835142 FAA . nu^ 

— — ^'^'^ * DMS @)002/002 

CERTrFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that I have thi.s date placed in tlie United States mail, Certilicd 

Return Receipt Requested, a copy of the Withdrawal of Notice of Appeal addressed to ihe 

IbUowing: 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Wilbur Wright Building, Sto 2W1000 

800 Independence Avenue, $.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Francis C. Ilcil, Ksq. 

Legal DcparlmenL 

American Eagle, LK. 

P.O. Box 619616 TV1D5675 

DFW Airport, TX 75261-9616 

U Sylvia Twa, ParaLcgal Technician 

Fcdeixl^Aviation Administration 

Dated: / - /^ . 2^/ /
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20
- 2316

In re: PERCY JAME S TUCKER , Petitioner

.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus . ( 2:09

- cr - 00182

- AWA

- DEM

- 1 )

Submitted : February 4, 2021 Decided: April 19, 2021

Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and THACKER , Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion

. Percy James Tucker, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Percy James Tucker petitions for a writ of mandamus, asking us to order the district
court to file and consider motions in his closed criminal case. “[M]andamus is a drastic remedy that must be reserved for extraordinary situations.” In re Murphy

- Brown, LLC , 907 F.3d 788, 795 (4th Cir. 2018) (internal quotation marks and citations omitted). “Courts provide mandamus relief only when (1) petitioner ‘ha[s] no other adequate means to attain the relief [he] desires’; (2) petitioner has shown a ‘clear and indi sputable’ right to the requested relief; and (3) the court deems the writ ‘appropriate under the circumstances.’” Id. (quoting Cheney v. U.S. Dist. Court , 542 U.S. 367, 380

- 81 (2004)). The writ of mandamus is not a substitute for appeal after final judgme nt

. Will v. United States , 389 U.S. 90, 97 (1967); In re Lockheed Martin Corp. , 503 F.3d 351, 353 (4th Cir. 2007). We have reviewed Tucker’s petition and amended petition, and we conclude that he fails to show that he is entitled to the requested relief . Accordingly, we deny the petition and amended petition for a writ of mandamus. We deny the motion for release as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court a nd argument would not aid the decisional
process. PETITION DENIED
**THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS**

**Post Office Box 12248**

**Austin, Texas 78711**

**(512) 463-1312**

June 01, 2007

Mr. J. Arnold Aguilar

Law Office of J. Arnold Aguilar

1200 Central Boulevard, Suite H-2

Brownsville, TX 78520

Mr. Miguel A. Pruneda Jr.

THE PRUNEDA LAW FIRM, P.L.L.C.

P.O. Box 1664

Pharr, TX 78577

RE:Case Number:  06-0516

Court of Appeals Number:  13-05-00509-CV

Trial Court Number:  CL,43,466-D

Style:CITY OF ELSA, TEXAS

v.

M.A.L., ET AL.

Dear Counsel:

Today the Supreme Court of Texas delivered the enclosed per curiam opinion and judgment in the above-referenced cause.  

Sincerely,

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk

by Claudia Jenks, Chief Deputy Clerk

Enclosures

**Case No. 06-0516Page 1**
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

________________ _________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,

v. SALVADOR QUINTANA-CENEJO, a/k/a Jose Jesus Ortega Hernandez, Defendant - Appellant. No. 16-1060 (D.C. No. 1:15-CR-0 0256-REB-DW-1) (D. Colo.)

________________ _________________ ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

________________ _________________ Before BRISCOE , O’BRIEN , and MATHESON , Circuit Judges.

________________ _________________ Following his acceptance of a plea agreement that in cluded a waiver of his right to appeal, Salvador Quintana-Cenej o pleaded guilty to il legal reentry after removal and subsequent to a felony conviction, in violati on of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b)(1). He was sentenced to eight mont hs’ imprisonment. Despite his waiver, Quintana-Cenejo filed an appeal. The government moves to enforce Quintana-Cenejo’s appeal waiver. See United States v. Hahn , 359 F.3d 1315, 1328 (10th Cir. 2004) (en banc) (per curiam).

* This panel has determined unanim ously that oral argument would not materially assist in the dete rmination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The cas e is therefore ordered submitt ed without oral argument. This order and judgment is not binding pre cedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It ma y be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1. FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### June 17, 2016
Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court2 In evaluating a motion to enforce a waiv er, we consider: “(1) whether the disputed appeal falls within the scope of the waiver of appellate rights; (2) whether the defendant knowingly and voluntarily waiv ed his appellate rights; and (3) whether enforcing the waiver would result in a miscarriage of justice.” Id. at 1325. Quintana-Cenejo’s counsel ha s filed a response, “conced[i ng] that, under the standard announced in [ Hahn ], the plea agreement’s appeal wa iver is enforceab le with respect to this direct appeal.” Aplt. Resp. at 1. Our independent review confirms that Quintana-Cenejo’s appeal waiver is enforceable. The issue he seeks to raise on appeal—a challenge to the substantive and procedural reasonableness of his sentence—falls within the scope of his appeal waiver and is not subject to any of the exce ptions to that waiver . The plea agreement also clearly sets forth the appeal waiver, stating that it was knowing and voluntary, and the district court c onfirmed Quintana-Cenejo’s understanding of his appeal waiver during his change of plea hear ing. Moreover, we see no evidence contradicting Quintana-Cenejo’s knowing and voluntary acceptance of the appeal waiver. Finally, there is no indication that enforcing the waiver would result in a miscarriage of justice as defined in Hahn , 359 F.3d at 1327. The motion to enforce is granted and this matter is dismissed.

Entered for the Court Per Curiam
Before the First Division,

August 30, 1939

No. 42022.

#### Protest 963133-G of China Dry Goods Co. (San Francisco).

Opinion by.

McClelland, P. J.

An examination of the sample demonstrated that it in no way simulates a natural flower. As it was stipulated to be in chief value of metal the claim at 45 percent under paragraph 397 was sustained.