alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
July 9, 1970

No. 22,973

#### United States v Robert E. Brown, Jr., PFC, U. S. Army (CM 420258).

On consideration of the Motion to Strike the Petition for Grant of Review filed in the above-entitled action, it appearing that the appellant was notified of the decision of the board of review on May 6, 1969, and did not seek review of the board’s decision until he placed a Petition for Grant of Review in military channels on April 9, 1970, filed in this Court May 7, 1970; and it further appearing that no good cause has been shown sufficient to relieve appellant from the default resulting from his failure to petition this Court within the time fixed by Article 67(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 867(c), it is, by the Court, this 9th day of July 1970,

ORDERED:

That said Motion to Strike the Petition for Grant of Review be, and the same is hereby, granted.

FERGUSON, Judge

(Dissenting) :

I would deny the Motion to Strike the Petition for Grant of Review and allow the Government fifteen days in which to reply to the issue raised. I am of the opinion that notwithstanding that the time for petitioning the Court in the ordinary course of review has elapsed, the petitioner questions the jurisdiction of the court-martial to hear his case within the meaning of O’Callahan v Parker, 395 US 258, 23 L Ed 2d 291, 89 S Ct 1683 (1969), and the question of jurisdiction may be raised at anytime. United States v Ferguson, 17 USCMA 200, 37 CMR 464 (1967). Had this accused made a timely request for review (Article 67(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 867), he would not have been foreclosed by the determination in Mercer v Dillon, 19 USCMA 264, 41 CMR 264 (1970), that *O’Callahan*applies only to convictions that were not final before June 2, 1969.

But whether his petition is considered as a request for original review, or in the nature of a Petition for Writ of Error Coram Nobis (United States v Frischholz, 16 USCMA 150, 36 CMR 306 (1966), good cause has been shown for the *630relief requested. Cf. United States v Brant, 19 USCMA 493, 42 CMR 95 (1970); United States v Garcia, 18 USCMA 5, 39 CMR 5 (1968).
SetupPLEASE DO NOT CHANGE ANYTHING HEREUser ChoicesFPindex2AEO 2000 - Reference CaseStartYear2006Projection TrendBaseOpt1Baseline (SEER=10)Elec ElecElecStdOpt430% Impr. (SEER=13)cent/kWh cent/kWh cent/kWhPriceOpt 1 19988.05 1.0019988.05System Opt 1 19997.92 0.9820007.86CB 0 20007.86 0.9820107.3920017.74 0.9620207.28Multi-Run Options:20027.63 0.9520307.28StdOptBegin 2 20037.59 0.942000-2030StdOptEnd 7 20047.56 0.94Growth -0.3%20057.47 0.93Comm./Resid. Choice2<-This cell is dynamically defined when20067.48 0.93user updates the % comm. and % resid.20077.48 0.93% Shipment Breakdown(Don’t change assumptions here)20087.46 0.93Commercial1 10.0% 20097.37 0.92Residential2 90.0% 20107.39 0.92Base Manuf. Cost$51120117.33 0.91Base Equipment Price$1,24020127.30 0.91Base Opt Manuf. Cost$51120137.29 0.91Base Opt Equipment Price$1,24020147.32 0.91Std Opt Manuf. Cost$73120157.33 0.91Std Opt Equipment Price$1,66520167.32 0.91System Installation Price$1,36720177.32 0.9120187.32 0.91value user use 20197.29 0.91used value default 20207.28 0.90Manufacturer Markup123% 0% 120217.28 0.90Distributor Markup109% 0% 120227.28 0.90Dealer Markup127% 0% 120237.28 0.90Builder Markup109% 0% 120247.28 0.90Sales Tax104% 0% 120257.28 0.90Std. Level20267.28 0.90Std Opt Price Multiplier100% 0% 1020277.28 0.90109% 0% 1120287.28 0.90116% 0% 1220297.28 0.90143% 0% 1320307.28 0.90174% 0% 14187% 0% 15187% 0% 16Page 1
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
§906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 April 29, 2005 In connection with the filing of the annual report on Form 10-K of Hastings Entertainment, Inc., a
Texas corporation (the Company), for the annual period ended January 31, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned
officers of the Company certifies that, to such officers knowledge:  (1)
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(2)
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the
periods expressed in the Report. /s/ John H. MarmadukeJohn H. Marmaduke
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) /s/ Dan CrowDan Crow
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) A signed original of this written statement required by §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has
been provided to Hastings Entertainment, Inc. and will be retained by Hastings Entertainment, Inc.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission, or its staff, upon request.
|WELLS
    FARGO(logo) | Corporate
                                                       Trust Services
                                                       MAC R1204-010
                                                       9062 Old Annapolis Road
                                                       Columbia, MD 21045
                                                       Tel: 410 884 2000
                                                       Fax: 410 715 2380
|--------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Re: |  | Annual Statement of Compliance for CFCRE 2016-C6 Mortgage Trust Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates,
Series 2016-C6
|--- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Per the Pooling and Servicing Agreement
dated as of November 1, 2016 (the “Agreement”), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.,
as Certificate Administrator (“Wells Fargo”), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31,
2016 (the “Reporting Period”):



(a) A review of Wells Fargo’s
activities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer’s supervision;
and



(b) To the
best of such officer’s knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement
in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.



February 27, 2017



|/s/
    BRIAN SMITH | 
|------------------- | 
|BRIAN
    SMITH     | 
|Vice
    President  | 



|Wells
    Fargo Bank, N.A. | Together
    we’ll go far
|-------------------------- | -------------------------
Exhibit 12





United Air Lines, Inc. and Subsidiary Companies



Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges





|                                              | Three Months Ended
|--------------------------------------------- | ------------------
|                                              | March 31          
|                                              |                   
|                                              | 2002              
|                                              | (In Millions)     
|Earnings:                                     |                   
|                                              |                   
|Earnings (loss) before income taxes           | $   (776)         
|Fixed charges, from below                     | 201               
|Undistributed (earnings) losses of affiliates | -                 
|Interest capitalized                          | (11)              
|                                              |                   
|Earnings (loss)                               | $(586)            
|                                              |                   
|Fixed charges:                                |                   
|                                              |                   
|Interest expense                              | $   146           
|Portion of rental expense representative      |                   
|of the interest factor                        | 55                
|                                              |                   
|Fixed charges                                 | $201              
|                                              |                   
|Ratio of earnings to fixed charges            | (a)               
|                                              |                   
|                                              |                   

___________

(a) Earnings were inadequate to cover fixed charges by $787 million in 2002 and $545 million in 2001.
Exhibit 4.17.4  Additional Agreement No. 1  To Agency Agreement between OAO
Rostelecom and OJSC Dalsvyaz No. 33-06-23 dated June 09,
2006  Moscow
  
  Dated
  June 9, 2007  Rostelecom, Open Joint-Stock Company for Long-Distance and
International Telecommunications,
hereinafter, Rostelecom, represented by OAO Rostelecom General Director Dmitry Yevgenievich Yerokhin, authorized to act by the
Charter, on the one part, and Far East Telecommunications Company, Open
Joint-Stock Company, hereinafter referred to as the Operator, represented by
General Director Anton Alekseyevich Alekseyev,
authorized to act by the Charter, on the other part hereinafter collectively
referred to as the Parties, and severally, as Party, have entered into this
Additional Agreement (hereinafter, the Additional Agreement) on the
incorporation of the below-listed amendments in the Agency Agreement
(hereinafter, the Agreement), as follows:  1.To add to the Agreement clause 12.4that
states:  The Parties hereby establish that terms and conditions
of the Agreement entered into thereby shall apply to their relations arisen
since January 01, 2006.  2.All terms used in this Additional Agreement have a meaning, fixed for
them in the Agreement.  3.All the rest, not indicated in this Additional Agreement, is subject to
the provisions of the Agreement.  4.The Additional Agreement is issued in the Russian language in two
original counterparts, one for  each
Party.  5.The Additional Agreement shall enter into legal force on the Agreement
Date and expire with the expiry of Agency Agreement No. 33-06-23
on June 09, 2006.  6.Details and Signatures of the Parties  For OAO Rostelecom:
  Legal address:15,Dostoyevskyst.,191002 Saint Petersburg
  General Director
                              
  D.Ye. Yerokhin
                                    
  2007
  Seal here
  
  For OJSCDalsvyaz
  Legaladdress:57, Svetlanskaya st.,
  690950, Vladivostok
  General Director
                                  
  A.A. Alekseyev
                                    
  2007
  Seal here  1
(Reap. Dec. 9614)

#### Gallagher and Ascher Co. *v.*United States

Entry No. 4765.

(Decided March 1, 1960)

*Henehan & Mclnerney for the plaintiff.*

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Mollison, Judge:

Counsel for the parties have submitted the above-enumerated appeal for reappraisement upon stipulation on the basis of which I find foreign value, as defined in section 402(c),. Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, is the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise involved, and that such value is the unit invoiced prices in French francs per 1,000 square feet, less 15.35 per centum tax, net, packed.

Judgment will issue accordingly.
### Coal prospects and coal exploration and development in the lower Matanuska Valley, Alaska, in 1950

By: Farrell F. BarnesDonald Merle Ford

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/cir154

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
(Reap. Dec. 9857)

#### Inter Maritime Fwdg. Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States

Entry No. 798622, etc.

(Decided November 29, 1960)

*Siegel, MandeTl & Davidson*for the plaintiffs.

*George Ooehran Douh,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Ford, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule “A,” attached hereto and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the parties hereto, subject to the approval of the Court, that the merchandise and the issues in the Appeals to Reappraisement listed in the Schedule attached hereto and made a part hereof are the same in all material respects as the merchandise and the issues decided in the case of *Paramount Import Co., Inc. et al.*v. *United States,*Reap. Dec. 9697, and that the record in said case be incorporated and made a part of the record herein.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the appraised values of the merchandise covered by the Appeals to Reappraisements enumerated herein, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the Appraiser in similar eases, is equal to the market value or the price at the time of exportation of such merchandise to the United States, at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all *577other costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States, and that there was no higher foreign value for such or similar merchandise.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the cases may be submitted on the foregoing stipulation.

Accepting this stipulation as a statement of fact, I find and hold the export value, as that value is defined in section 402(d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise covered by the appeals listed in schedule “A,” attached hereto and made a part hereof, and that said value is the appraised values of the merchandise, less the additions made by the importer on entry.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
No. 45208.

#### Protest 838829-G of Wm. Shaland (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

It was stipulated that certain of the merchandise consists of squawker balloons similar to those the subject of Abstract 40493 and kazoos like those the subject of Abstracts 44122 and 32264. The claim at 45 percent under paragraphs 409 and 397 was therefore sustained.
# Official Journal L 268/2020

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 268 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6314 August 2020 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 268

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6314 August 2020

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1187 of 7 August 2020 granting a Union authorisation for the biocidal product family ‘Iodine based products – CID LINES NV’ (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1187 of 7 August 2020 granting a Union authorisation for the biocidal product family ‘Iodine based products – CID LINES NV’ (
  1
  )

1

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
EXHIBIT 99.2



     CERTIFICATION BY THE PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER OF
               COMPETITIVE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
                 PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
       THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)


     I, Frank R. McPike, Jr., am Executive Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of Competitive
Technologies, Inc. (the Company).

     This certification is being furnished pursuant to 18
U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in connection with the filing of
the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarterly period ended January 31, 2003 (the Report).

     I hereby certify that to the best of my knowledge:

  1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of
     Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
     1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

  2.   The information contained in the Report fairly
     presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
     and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and
     for the periods covered by the Report.


  Date: March 17, 2003

                                    /s/ Frank R. McPike, Jr.
                                    Frank R. McPike, Jr.
                                    Executive Vice President,
                                    Chief Financial Officer
                                    and Treasurer of
                                    Competitive Technologies, Inc.
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 387 

Expressing the sense of Congress that the United States should sever diplomatic relations with Zimbabwe until such time as the President determines that Zimbabwe meets requirements relating to democratic, free 

and fair elections, basic civil liberties and human rights, and certain 

other requirements. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 26, 2008 

Mr. TANCREDO (for himself and Mr. CHABOT) submitted the following 

concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of Congress that the United States 

should sever diplomatic relations with Zimbabwe until 

such time as the President determines that Zimbabwe 

meets requirements relating to democratic, free and fair 

elections, basic civil liberties and human rights, and certain other requirements. 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that the 

3 United States should sever diplomatic relations with 

4 Zimbabwe until such time as the President determines 

5 that— 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•HCON 387 IH 

1 (1) Zimbabwe is governed at the national and 

2 local levels by governments that are democratically 

3 elected from free and fair elections conducted under 

4 the supervision of internationally recognized observ5 ers and in which— 

6 (A) opposition parties are permitted ample 

7 time to organize and campaign for such elec8 tions; and 

9 (B) all candidates are permitted access to 

10 the media; 

11 (2) the Zimbabwean Government is showing re12 spect for the basic civil liberties and human rights 

13 of the citizens of Zimbabwe; 

14 (3) Zimbabwe has adopted a market-oriented 

15 economic system based on the right to own and 

16 enjoy property without regard to race or political af17 filiation; 

18 (4) the Zimbabwean Government has put in 

19 place a mechanism to ensure regular free and fair 

20 elections; 

21 (5) the Zimbabwean Government has estab22 lished an independent judiciary; and 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
3 

•HCON 387 IH 

1 (6) Zimbabwe’s current dictator, Robert 

2 Mugabe, is no longer part of the Zimbabwean Gov3 ernment in any capacity. 

Æ 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1  
 **Certification**
 
 **Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**
 **(Subsections
(a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States
Code)**
   Pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), the
undersigned officer of SonomaWest Holdings, Inc., a California corporation (the
" Company "), does
hereby certify that to his knowledge:
  The
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 (the
" Form
10-Q ") of the
Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  Dated:
May 12, 2005
 
 /s/
Roger S. Mertz
 Roger S.
Mertz
 Chairman
of the Board
  A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
SonomaWest Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by SonomaWest Holdings, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
   
 -23-
No. 43132.

#### Protests 486524-G, etc., of Mallouk Bros. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

From the record it was found that the merchandise consists of Venice lace and filet lace similar to that involved in *Littwitz*v. *United States*(3 Cust. Ct. 123, C. D. 217) and *United States*v. *Jabara*(22 C. C. P. A. 77, T. D. 47065). The claim at 75 percent under paragraph 1430 was therefore sustained.
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-12-0000512 30-OCT-2013 09:56 AM
No. 48133.

#### Protests 42196-K, etc., of F. C. Mader (Tampa).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

An examination of the record disclosed no evidence sufficient to overcome the presumption of correctness attaching to the collector’s action. The protests were'therefore overruled.