alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

Exhibit 99.14

Comprehensive Credit Facility Agreement of Maximum Amount 
(Credit Facility Agreement) Entered into by and between BAK International (Tianjin) Limited Co., Ltd

(the Company) and Tianjin Branch, China Bohai Bank (the
Creditor) Dated January 19, 2010

Main articles:

- Contract number: Bojin Fenzong(2010)2;
- Maximum amount of credit facilities to be provided: RMB 100 million;
- Term: from January 19, 2010 to January 19, 2011.
- Purpose of the loan is to provide working capital for the Company;
- In the event of occurrence of any of the following during the term of loan, the Creditor is entitled to adjust the credit amount or even terminate the credit:

> Delay in repayment of interest for the loan;
>       Embezzling loan (i.e. using loan proceeds for purposes other than what is agreed in the contract without the consent of the Creditor);
>       Making untrue declaration or breach of promise;
>       Breach of other agreements

- Remedies in the event of breach of contract include adjustment of the credit amount, suspension of credit, imposition of punitive interest and overdue interest, an increase of guarantee deposit and the call back of loan principal
and interest before maturity.
- Special agreement: The Company would borrow RMB 40 million for short-term loans currently. After the annual report audit for the year of 2009 is released and phase-1 project realizes the scale of production, the remaining amount
of credit facilities, RMB 60 million, could be borrowed with Creditors approval.

Headlines of the articles omitted

- Terms and Explanation
- Procedure on using the comprehensive credit facility
- Precondition
- Guarantee
- Declaration and promise of the Company
- Modification, amendment, termination and invalidation of the Contract
- Disputation settlement
- Information Disclosure
- Attachment
- Other agreements
- Validity

---
|   | 4.3 | Length                of                Deferral.  Compensation deferred under the terms of the                Plan shall be deferred until the payment date described in Section                4.4(b)                below. |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (b) | Timing                of                Payment.  Payment of the Participant’s deferred                Compensation amounts shall commence (or, in the case of lump-sum                payments,                shall be made) on or as soon as practicable after the Default Commencement                Date.  The Default Commencement Date shall be January 15 of the                fiscal year following the fiscal year in which the Participant has                a                termination of employment within the meaning of Code Section 409A,                but in                no event earlier than the date which is six months after such termination                of employment.  A Participant may elect (on such form or forms                provided by the Committee for such purpose) to defer commencement                of                payment to on or about January 15 of any future year, provided that                payment must commence no later than the later                of: |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (i) | On                  or about the five-year anniversary of the "Default Commencement                  Date",                  or |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (ii) | On                or about the January 15th                following                the Participant’s 65th                birthday. |
|--------|------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
August 31, 1944

No. 6050.

#### *United*States v. *M. V. Jenkins et al.*

Entered at Sumas and Blaine, Wash. Reap. Dec. 6040. Motion by defendant.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 90 (Thursday, May 10, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 26616]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-8934]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP07-427-000]


Gulfstream Natural Gas System, L.L.C.; Notice of Proposed Changes 
in FERC Gas Tariff

May 3, 2007.
    Take notice that on May 1, 2007, Gulfstream Natural Gas System, 
L.L.C. (Gulfstream) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, 
Original Volume No. 1, Sixth Revised Sheet No. 7, with an effective 
date of June 1, 2007.
    Gulfstream states that copies of its filing have been mailed to all 
affected customers and interested state commissions.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed in accordance with the provisions of 
Sec.  154.210 of the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 154.210). Anyone 
filing an intervention or protest must serve a copy of that document on 
the Applicant. Anyone filing an intervention or protest on or before 
the intervention or protest date need not serve motions to intervene or 
protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#bafcffe8f9f5d4d6d3d4dfe9cfcacad5c8cefadcdfc8d994ddd5cc"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7b3d3e293834151712151e280e0b0b14090f3b1d1e0918551c140d">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-8934 Filed 5-9-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Before the First Division,

September 8, 1943

No. 48732.

#### Petition 6365-R of Denver Dry Goods Co. (Denver).

Opinion by

Cole, J.

It appeared from the testimony that the additional duties were assessed by reason of the Government conducting an investigation, using samples furnished by the petitioner at the time of entry, which resulted in appraisement at a higher value, although at the time Of entry the importer upon seeking information as to the value was informed that the Government had no knowledge of any prices other than those shown on the invoice. The court was satisfied that the entry was made without any intention to defraud the revenue of the United States, or to conceal or misrepresent the facts. Following *United States*v. *Dow*(16 Ct. Cust. Appls. 304, T. D. 42875) the petition was granted.
#### ROSEN ENTERTAINMENT SYSTEMS, LP, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ICON ENTERPRISES INTERNATIONAL, INC., Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-1290.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Aug. 31, 2005.

Before MICHEL, Chief Judge, NEWMAN and SCHALL, Circuit Judges.

NEWMAN, Circuit Judge.

*ORDER*

Icon Enterprises International, Inc. moves to voluntarily dismiss its appeal. Rosen Entertainment Systems, LP opposes. Icon replies.

Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The motion to dismiss is granted.

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-22-00493-CR

Jose Manuel Avendano Quin a/k/a Jose Quin

v.

The State of Texas

On Appeal from the

93rd District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CR-0599-21-B

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

December 7, 2023
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1998
<CASH>                                          17,753
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   24,003
<ALLOWANCES>                                       481
<INVENTORY>                                     48,461
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               103,075
<PP&E>                                         262,299
<DEPRECIATION>                                  60,559
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 323,908
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           44,810
<BONDS>                                        200,935
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      44,691
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   323,908
<SALES>                                        187,092
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               187,092
<CGS>                                          162,042
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   19,624
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   111
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,657
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (893)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (347)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (546)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (546)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Drone Maintenance Log

Date of Repair Brand Model Diagnostics Part Repaired/or Replaced Cost of Parts Cost of Labor Date or Repair Done Serial Number Ready/Safe for Flight Denial Reasons + Any Conditions.

8/10/2015 DJI Phantom 3 Professional Series W323 Propeller Damaged- Chip on Wing Replaced Propeller $5 $25 8/10/2015 CCAE15LPO850T3 YES

8/15/2015 DJI Phantom 3 Professional Series W323 Propeller Replacement (36 hours of flight) Replaced Propeller $5 $25 8/15/2015 CCAE15LPO850T3 YES

8/30/2015 DJI Phantom 3 Professional Series W323 General Aircraft Maintenance Check Passed $0.00 $150 8/30/2015 CCAE15LPO850T3 YES

9/25/2015 DJI Phantom 3 Professional Series W323 Replaced Propeller- Chip on Wing Replaced Propeller $5 $25 9/25/2015 CCAE15LPO850T3 YES

9/25/2015 DJI Phantom 3 Professional Series W323 Camera Lens attached = Blurry images Wiped Camera Lens $0.00 $0.00 9/25/2015 CCAE15LPO850T3 YES

9/30/2015 DJI Phantom 3 Professional Series W323 General Aircraft Maintenance Check Passed $0.00 $150 9/30/2015 CCAE15LPO850T3 YES

10/22/2015 DJI Phantom 3 Professional Series W323 Propeller Replacement (36 hours of flight) Replaced Propeller $5 $25 10/22/2015 CCAE15LPO850T3 YES

10/22/2015 DJI Phantom 3 Professional Series W323 Propeller Replacement (36 hours of flight) Replaced Propeller $5 $25 10/22/2015 CCAE15LPO850T3 YES

10/22/2015 DJI Phantom 3 Professional Series W323 Propeller Replacement (36 hours of flight) Replaced Propeller $5 $25 10/22/2015 CCAE15LPO850T3 YES

11/1/2015 DJI Phantom 3 Professional Series W323 Propeller Replacement (36 hours of flight) Replaced Propeller $5 $25 11/1/2015 CCAE15LPO850T3 YES

11/30/2015 DJI Phantom 3 Professional Series W323 General Aircraft Maintenance Check Passed $0.00 $150 11/30/2015 CCAE15LPO850T3 YES

12/1/2015 DJI Phantom 3 Remote GL300A Remote Wire not Connecting to Tablet Replaced Tablet $450 $0.00 1/12/2016 CCAE15LP0890T2 YES

12/10/2015 DJI Phantom 3 Professional Series W323 Propeller Damaged- Chip on Wing Replaced Propeller $5 $25 12/10/2015 CCAE15LPO850T3 NO

1/30/2015 DJI Phantom 3 Professional Series W323 General Aircraft Maintenance Check Passed $0 $150 1/30/2015 CCAE15LPO850T3 YES

2/10/2015 DJI Phantom 3 Professional Series W323 Propeller Replacement (36 hours of flight) Replaced Propeller $5 $25 2/10/2015 CCAE15LPO850T3 YES

2/10/2015 DJI Phantom 3 Professional Series W323 Propeller Replacement (36 hours of flight) Replaced Propeller $5 $25 2/10/2015 CCAE15LPO850T3 YES

2/10/2015 DJI Phantom 3 Professional Series W323 Propeller Replacement (36 hours of flight) Replaced Propeller $5 $25 2/10/2015 CCAE15LPO850T3 YES

2/10/2015 DJI Phantom 3 Professional Series W323 Propeller Replacement (36 hours of flight) Replaced Propeller $5 $25 2/10/2015 CCAE15LPO850T3 YES

Waiting for repair on 12/1/2015 to clear. Once that repair clears, then this will clear
#### Globe Shipping Co., Inc. (for Account of Nicholas Gal) et al. *v.*United States Nicholas Gal (Globe Shipping Co., Inc.) *v.*United States and United States *v.*Nicholas Gal

No. 6276.

Entry Nos. 840317, etc., 785826.

Invoices dated Teningen, Germany, June 7, 1936, etc.

Certified June 12, 1935, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., June 25, 1935, etc.

(Decided May 14, 1946)

*Eugene R. Pickrell*for the importers.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the United States.

Kincheloe, Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the attorneys for the parties hereto, subject to the approval of the court, that the facts and issues involved in the appeals to reappraisement listed in schedule A attached hereto are the same in all material respects as the facts and issues involved in *Nicholas Gal*v. *The United States,*Reappraisement Nos. 129805-A, 138496-A, and 138545-A.

That at the time of exportation of the merchandise covered by the instant appeals to reappraisement the market value or the price at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of Germany, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature, and all other costs, charges, and expenses incident to *356placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States, was the invoice price of the merchandise, less insurance, freight to German port, sea freight, consular fee, as noted on the respective invoices and attached entry papers, and less duties.

It is further stipulated and agreed that on or about the dates of exportation of the instant merchandise there was no higher foreign value.

It is further stipulated and agreed that the record in Reappraisements Nos. 129805-A, 138496-A, and 138545-A be incorporated as a part of the record in these appeals to reappraisement and that these appeals to reappraisement are submitted upon this stipulation.

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the invoice prices, less insurance, freight to German port, sea freight, consular fee, as noted on the respective invoices and attached entry papers, and less duties.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
**Exhibit 13.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF**

**THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Pursuant  to  18  U.S.C  §   1350,   as  created  by  Section  906  of  theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned  officer of Open Joint Stock CompanyLong-Distance    and    International    Telecommunications    Rostelecom   (the“Company”)   hereby  certifies,  to  such  officer’s   knowledge,that:

 

(i) the  accompanying  annual  report on Form 20-F of the  Company  for the yearended  December  31,  2004  (the  “Report”)  fully  complies  with therequirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(ii) the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

Date:  June 29, 2005 

/signed/ Dmitry Ye. Yerokhin

_______________________ 

**Dmitry Ye. Yerokhin**

General Director (CEO) 

OJSC Long-Distance and International 

Telecommunications Rostelecom

 

 

 

 

 

----
EXHIBIT 10.33

                                  AMENDMENT TO
                            THE CARNIVAL CORPORATION
                     "FUN SHIPsm" NONQUALIFIED SAVINGS PLAN




     The Carnival Corporation "Fun Shipsm " Nonqualifed Savings Plan (the
"Plan") is hereby amended, effective January 1, 2000, as follows:

     (1) A new Section 2.14(f) is added to the Plan to read as follows:

          (f) If a Participant transfers directly from an Affiliated Company to
     any company in which the Company holds an equity interest (but that is not
     an Affiliated Company), service with such company shall be counted solely
     for purposes of determining a Participant's vested interest in Matching and
     Profit-Sharing Contributions under Article 5 of the Plan.  Service with
     such company shall not be credited if it occurs prior to the date the
     individual became a Participant in the Plan or after the Participant works
     at any entity in which the Company does not hold an equity interest.

     (2) Section 6.3 is amended to read as follows:

          6.3 Establishment of Investment Funds:  The Retirement Committee will
     establish one or more Investment Funds (such as those described in Appendix
     A) which will be maintained for the purpose of determining the investment
     return to be credited to each Participant's Account.  The Retirement
     Committee may change the number, identity or composition of the Investment
     Funds from time to time.  Each Participant will indicate the Investment
     Funds based on which amounts allocated in accordance with Articles 4 and 5
     are to be adjusted.  Each Participant's Account will be increased or
     decreased by the net amount of investment earnings or losses that it would
     have achieved had it actually been invested in the deemed investments.  The
     Company is not required to purchase or hold any of the deemed investments.
     Investment Fund elections must be made in a minimum of 1% increments and at
     such times and in such manner as the Retirement Committee will specify.  An
     active or inactive Participant periodically may change his election as to
     his deemed investments with respect to Employee Deferral Contributions,
     Bonus Deferrals, Matching Contributions or Profit-Sharing Contributions in
     such manner as the Retirement Committee may specify.  If a Participant
     fails to make an Investment Fund election, the amount in the Participant's
     Account will be deemed to have been invested in a money market fund or any
     other fund as determined by the Retirement Committee.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOHN LUCAS, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 v. 

COUNTY OF KERN; et al., 

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 20-16439 

D.C. No. 1:20-cv-00552-DAD-JLT 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Dale A. Drozd, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 20, 2021**

Before: THOMAS, Chief Judge, TASHIMA and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges. 

John Lucas appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment sua sponte 

dismissing his action alleging federal and state law claims. We have jurisdiction 

under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm.

In his opening brief, Lucas fails to raise, and therefore has waived, any 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

APR 28 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 20-16439 

challenge to the district court’s dismissal of his action. See Indep. Towers of Wash. 

v. Washington, 350 F.3d 925, 929 (9th Cir. 2003) (“[W]e will not consider any

claims that were not actually argued in appellant’s opening brief.”); Acosta-Huerta 

v. Estelle, 7 F.3d 139, 144 (9th Cir. 1993) (issues not supported by argument in pro 

se appellant’s opening brief are waived).

The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying leave to amend the 

complaint because amendment would have been futile. See Cervantes v. 

Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., 656 F.3d 1034, 1041 (9th Cir. 2011) (setting forth 

standard of review and explaining that a district court may dismiss without leave to 

amend when amendment would be futile).

AFFIRMED.