alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
In the

United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit ____________________

No. 16-1262

LAWRENCE HAYES,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

GREGG SCOTT,

Defendant-Appellee.

____________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Central District of Illinois.

No. 3:13-cv-03195 — Colin S. Bruce, Judge.

____________________

SUBMITTED DECEMBER 21, 2016 — DECIDED JANUARY 25, 2017

____________________

Before WOOD, Chief Judge, and POSNER and FLAUM, Circuit 

Judges.

POSNER, Circuit Judge. The Rushville Treatment and Detention Facility in Rushville, Illinois, houses persons adjudged to be sexually violent; often they are persons who 

have completed prison sentences for sexually violent acts 

but are considered too dangerous to be released into the 

general population; so they remain confined, though in a facility (Rushville) that is not, at least technically, a prison. See, 
2 No. 16-1262

e.g., Hughes v. Scott, 816 F.3d 955, 955–56 (7th Cir. 2016). The 

plaintiff, a detainee at Rushville named Lawrence Hayes, 

sued Gregg Scott, Rushville’s acting director, claiming that 

Scott was deliberately indifferent to Hayes’s hydration needs 

during a five-day “boil order” imposed by the City of Rushville and applicable to the treatment and detention facility.

The boil order directed residents of Rushville (including 

the detainees in the treatment and detention center) to boil 

tap water before drinking it. The detainees have sinks in 

their rooms and access to a microwave oven, so during the 

five days in which the boil order was in effect Hayes could 

boil the water from his sink in his microwave. He was also 

given an eight-ounce carton of milk at each of his three daily 

meals. Yet he claims to have gone without any drinkable water for five days, during which time he felt dizzy and dehydrated.

The district judge granted summary judgment in favor of 

defendant Scott. He ruled that that the boil order did not deprive Hayes of adequate hydration, as he did not deny that 

microwave-boiled water from his room’s tap was drinkable 

and milk available to him at all meals. The unlimited microwave-boiled water and the servings of milk at each mealtime

(not to mention beverages at the commissary) were reasonable and adequate options for hydration. Nor is there any evidence that Scott was deliberately indifferent to the plight of 

the detainees during the boil order, since he notified them of 

the order and how to cope with it (by boiling water in their 

microwave ovens), and even ordered extra supplies of 

boiled water. Officials of detention facilities do not incur liability if they “responded reasonably to [a] risk [of harm to a 

detainee’s health and safety], even if the harm ultimately 
No. 16-1262 3

was not averted.” Peate v. McCann, 294 F.3d 879, 882 (7th Cir. 

2002). Here it was averted.

As for Hayes’s complaint about feeling dizzy and dehydrated during the boil order, he didn’t tell Scott about this, 

and there can’t be deliberate indifference if the indifferent 

person did not know what harm he was being indifferent to.

The judgment of the district court is therefore 

AFFIRMED.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



### January 8, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice


### 135012 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan 

### PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices



### v SC: 135012 COA: 270831 Wayne CC: 05-010939-01 THOMAS MARIO RANGE, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the applicati on for leave to appeal the August 21, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.

t1217 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

January 8, 2008

Clerk
No. 45229.

#### Protest 871651-G of Western Novelty Co. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of Abstract 42474 antimony table utensils were held dutiable at, 40 percent under paragraph 339. Articles similar to those the subject of Abstract 42382 were held dutiable at the same rate and under the same paragraph.
<PAGE>   1



                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.2


                     GEOWASTE INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES

                      COMPUTATION OF NET EARNINGS PER SHARE

                  FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996





<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                    Fully
                                                                    Primary         Diluted     
                                                                    -------         -------
                                                                                               
<S>                                                             <C>              <C>         
Weighted Average Common Shares
outstanding ..............................................        19,053,958       19,053,958


Convertible debt .........................................                          2,774,475

Stock options and warrants outstanding ...................         2,108,370        2,253,057
                                                                ------------     ------------

Weighted average shares of common shares
outstanding ..............................................        21,162,328       24,081,490
                                                                ============     ============

Net income ...............................................      $  1,463,457     $  1,711,074
                                                                ============     ============

Earnings per share .......................................      $        .07     $        .07
                                                                ============     ============
</TABLE>


Note:  Primary earnings per common share is used due to the anti dilutive
effect of the convertible debt.



                                       16
#### Lansen-Naeve Corp., et al. *v.*United States

No. 6486.

Entry No. 716273, etc.

Invoices dated London, England, September 13, 1945, etc.

Certified September, 1945, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., October 16, 1945, etc.

(Decided November 1, 1946)

*Jordan & Klmgaman*for the plaintiffs.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Kxncheloe, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importers on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
No. 46968.

#### Protest 77564-K of Schall & Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the tin boxes in question were held dutiable as containers not specially provided for, in chief value of tin plate, but not plated, at *22}i*percent under paragraph 397 and T. D. 49753 as claimed. Abstract 46175 followed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-28-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-27-1996
<CASH>                                       3,357,432
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,074,419
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 24,039,969
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            30,149,937
<PP&E>                                      11,488,166
<DEPRECIATION>                               7,364,604
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              34,586,124
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       16,491,582
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       110,344
<OTHER-SE>                                  17,256,657
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                34,586,124
<SALES>                                     43,679,875
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            47,750,019
<CGS>                                       30,427,879
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               48,846,296
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             559,898
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,656,175)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (559,400)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,096,775)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,096,775)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.98)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 88 (Tuesday, May 8, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 26137]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-8712]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Health Resources and Services Administration


Announcement of a Change to the Awarding Factors Under the Fiscal 
Year 2007 New Access Points in High Poverty Counties (HRSA-07-069) 
Grant Opportunity

AGENCY: Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), HHS.

ACTION: Revision to awarding factors.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) is 
announcing a change to the awarding factors under the HRSA-07-069 ``New 
Access Points in High Poverty Counties'' funding opportunity [issued on 
Grants.gov March 14, 2007] as they relate to awards made under the 
HRSA-07-067 ``New Access Points'' funding opportunity for the 
President's first Health Centers Initiative [issued on Grants.gov 
October 6, 2006].
    In making award decisions for fiscal year (FY) 2007, HRSA will now 
consider granting the same organization a new access point award under 
HRSA-07-067 and HRSA-07-069. HRSA will consider more than one FY 2007 
new access point award to an organization if, and only if each 
application submitted (by the same organization for the two different 
funding opportunities) proposes a separate and distinct project to 
serve different counties. That is, there must be no overlap or 
duplication of service area, target population, or sites. (Under 
previous HRSA policy, if an organization receives a grant award in FY 
2007 under the first opportunity, HRSA-07-067, it could not be awarded 
funds in FY 2007 under HRSA-07-069). Applicants for HRSA-07-069 should 
also be aware that each new access point application must be complete 
and must be able to stand alone.
    The changes announced in this Federal Register Notice do not impact 
any HRSA policy for eligibility under the HRSA-07-069. Organizations 
continue to be eligible to submit one application under HRSA-07-069, 
irrespective of whether they applied under HRSA-07-067 or not. 
Additionally, all other awarding factors detailed in HRSA-07-069 remain 
the same.
    Reference: HRSA-07-069 is available online via the HRSA Web site 
at: http://www.hrsa.gov/grants/technicalassistance/pi2nap.htm or http://www.grants.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Preeti Kanodia, Division of Policy and 
Development, Bureau of Primary Health Care, Health Resources and 
Services Administration. Ms. Kanodia may be contacted by e-mail at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#fbbfabbfbc9e959e899a97bb9389889ad59c948d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="185c485c5f7d767d6a797458706a6b79367f776e">[email protected]</span></a> or via telephone at (301) 594-4300.

    Dated: May 2, 2007.
Dennis P. Williams,
Deputy Administrator.
[FR Doc. E7-8712 Filed 5-7-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4165-15-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Wm. Rigglesworth *vs.*Isaac Reed.

A judgment below will be reversed where the name of the garnishee, and the damages and costs are left in blank.

This case was brought up by writ of error for several defects in the record below. Rigglesworth had been proceeded against, in the Court below, as a garnishee in a suit, wherein Reed was plaintiff, but in the *20entry of judgment, his name had been left blank. The amount of costs and damages was also left blank.

By tiie Court,

Mason, Chief Justice.

The proceedings in this case have been so irregular, and the record is so imperfect, that the judgment cannot be allowed to stand. The defects pointed out under the fifth and sixth head, in the assignment of errors, are fatal. The name of the garnishee against whom judgment was rendered was left blank in that judgment. The amount of the costs and damages was also left blank. For these and many other errors, we think that the judgment below should be reversed.

Judgment reversed.
##### 



1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Hastings Entertainment, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating
to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and(c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting.
 Date: April 20, 2007
    /s/ Dan CrowDan CrowVice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
§906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 April 16, 2004 In connection with the filing of the annual report on Form 10-K of Hastings
Entertainment, Inc., a Texas corporation (the Company), for the annual period
ended January 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned officers of the Company
certifies that, to such officers knowledge:     /s/
John H. MarmadukeJohn H. MarmadukePresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
 /s/ Dan CrowDan CrowVice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
 A signed original of this written statement required by §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been
provided to Hastings Entertainment, Inc. and will be retained by Hastings Entertainment, Inc. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission, or its staff, upon request.
---

Exhibit 99.13

Summary of Loan Agreement Entered into by and between
Shenzhen BAK Battery Co., Ltd. (the Company) And Longgang
Branch, Shenzhen Development Bank Co., Ltd (the Creditor)
on December 31, 2009

Main contents:

- Contract number: Shenfa Longgang Daizi 20091230001;
- Main Contract: Comprehensive Credit Facility Agreement;
- Main Contract number: Shenfa Longgang Zongzidi 20091221001;
- Loan principal: RMB20 million;
- Loan term: from December 31, 2009 to December 31 , 2010;
- Floating interest rate: Interest rate of loan shall be 95% of the
  benchmark rate announced by the Peoples Bank of China, and be adjusted every
  3 months;

| | ■ | Interest accrued and settled per month,
      interest settlement day is the 20th day of each month;      
| | - | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | ■ | Penalty interest rate for delayed repayment:
      current interest rate plus 50% * current interest rate;
| | ■ | Penalty interest rate for embezzlement of loan
      proceeds: current interest rate *1;                  

- Purpose of the loan is to provide working capital for the Company;
- If any of the following occurs, the Creditor is entitled to demand
  prepayment of loan principal and interest before maturity and cancel all loans
  unprovided ;

| | ■ | The Company terminates operation or is stopped
      from operation;                                                
| | - | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | ■ | The Company provides untrue documents or hide
      important financial information about its operation;            
| | ■ | The Company intentionally evades bank debts by
      way of related party transaction or other means;               
| | ■ | The Company uses loan proceeds for purposes
      other than what is agreed without the consent of the Creditor;    
| | ■ | Occurrence of other instances which endangers
      or may endanger the safety of the loan provided by the Creditor;

Headlines of the articles omitted:

- Interest clearing of the loan
- Payment of the loan
- Rights and obligation of the Company
- Rights and obligations of the Creditor
- Disputation settlement and Validity
- Fees
- Breach of contract penalties
- Declaration, guaranty and undertaking of the Company
- Amendment and Termination of Contract
- Others
- Text

---
No. 56665.

protests 172698-K and 180117-K (New York).

#### Dangkai Trading Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
## MA**TERIA LS NOT INCLUDED IN** 

**AI RWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE (A**  **D) DOCKET**
**FAA -**  **20 12**  **- 1135**  Docket Number
**2012 -**  **SW -**  **097 -** **AD** Directorate Identifier Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in DMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket - NPRM Agusta Bollettino Tecnico No. 139 - 308, dated October 26, 2012 .


### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Office of the Regional Counsel, Southwest Region Rules Docket 2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663 Fort W orth, Texas 76137 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
September 9, 1944

No. 6053.

#### *American Express Co.*v. *United States.*

Entered at New York, N. Y. Reap. Dec. 6037. Motion by plaintiff.
### Geology of proposed Blue Lake dam site and tunnel near Sitka, Alaska

By: William Stephens Twenhofel

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/cir147

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.7

                           CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT

                                    TO THE

                           ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION

                      OF COMBINED STAFFING SERVICES, INC.

     Pursuant to the provisions of Sections 78.385 and 78.390 of the Nevada
Revised Statutes, the undersigned certifies and acknowledges the following:

     1.   My name is Byron Stuckey. I am the President of Combined Staffing
Services, Inc. (the "Corporation").

     2.   The Board of Directors of the Corporation adopted the following
resolutions setting forth a proposed amendments to the Articles of Incorporation
of the Corporation, declaring its advisability, and calling a special meeting of
the stockholders entitled to vote and requesting a consent resolution to
consider the following amendments:

          RESOLVED, that the following amendment to the Articles of
     Incorporation of the Corporation be proposed to the stockholders of the
     Corporation entitled to vote, for their consideration:

               The FIRST paragraph of the Articles of Incorporation shall be
          amended To read as follows:

                    FIRST. The name of the corporation shall be SEIRIOS STAFF
               SERVICES, INC.

Certificate of Amendment to the
Articles of Incorporation of Combined Staffing Services, Inc.             Page 1

                                       1