alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 11.1 
 
      UNIVERSAL SECURITY INSTRUMENTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES 
               COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE 
                           (UNAUDITED) 
 
<TABLE>
                                 For the Six Months Ended
                            Sept 30, 1995        Sept 30, 1994 <S>
                        Amount   Per Share   Amount    Per Share
                      <C>         <C>      <C>           <C>
PRIMARY: 
Average shares
  outstanding         3,245,528            3,239,987
 
Dilutive stock
 options-based on
 the treasury stock
 method using the
 average market
 price                                        14,820
 
Adjusted shares
 outstanding          3,245,528            3,254,807
 
Net (loss) income     $(458,180)   $(.14)  $  53,667      $.02

</TABLE>

<TABLE>
                                 For the Three Months Ended       
                            Sept 30, 1995        Sept 30, 1994 <S>  
                        Amount    Per Share   Amount    Per Share
                      <C>          <C>     <C>            <C>
PRIMARY: 
Average shares
 outstanding          3,245,586             3,240,076
 
Dilutive stock
 options-based on
 the treasury stock
 method using the
 average market
 price                                         46,300 
 
Adjusted shares 
 outstanding          3,245,586             3,286,376

Net (loss) income    $(136,334)    $(.04)     $23,114      $.01

/TABLE
<PAGE>
                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1 
 
      UNIVERSAL SECURITY INSTRUMENTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES 
               COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE 
                           (UNAUDITED)

<TABLE>
                                 For the Six Months Ended         
                            Sept 30, 1995        Sept 30, 1994 <S>   
                        Amount   Per Share   Amount    Per Share
                      <C>         <C>      <C>          <C>
FULLY DILUTED:
Average shares
 outstanding          3,245,528            3,239,987
 
Dilutive stock
 options-based on
 the treasury stock
 method using the
 quarter-end market
 price if higher than
 the average market
 price                                        65,962
 
Adjusted shares
 outstanding          3,245,528            3,305,949
 
Net (loss) income     $(458,186)  $(.14)     $53,667       $.02

</TABLE>

<TABLE>
                                 For the Three Months Ended       
                            Sept 30, 1995        Sept 30, 1994 <S>
                        Amount   Per Share   Amount    Per Share
                      <C>         <C>      <C>          <C>
FULLY DILUTED:
Average shares
 outstanding          3,245,586            3,240,076
 
Dilutive stock
 options-based on
 the treasury stock
 method using the
 quarter-end market
 price if higher than
 the average market
 price                                        65,962
 
Adjusted shares
 outstanding         3,245,586             3,306,038

Net (loss) income    $(136,334)   $(.04)     $23,114     $.01

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>               5

<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information
extracted from the audited consolidated financial
statements of the Company included in the Report on
Form 10-Q and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>           12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                APR-29-2000
<PERIOD-START>                   APR-24-1999
<PERIOD-END>                     APR-29-2000
<CASH>                               4,151
<SECURITIES>                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                       77,772
<ALLOWANCES>                        (1,744)
<INVENTORY>                         86,117
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                   201,924
<PP&E>                              64,637
<DEPRECIATION>                     (12,912)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     454,849
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               84,906
<BONDS>                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                    0
<PREFERRED>                              0
<COMMON>                                17
<OTHER-SE>                         224,976
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>       454,849
<SALES>                            639,271
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                   639,271
<CGS>                              406,043
<TOTAL-COSTS>                      406,043
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                   184,586
<LOSS-PROVISION>                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                  13,342
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     33,635
<INCOME-TAX>                        15,120
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 18,515
<DISCONTINUED>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                          0
<CHANGES>                                0
<NET-INCOME>                        18,515
<EPS-BASIC>                         1.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                         1.06



</TABLE>
**Shenzhen      Development Bank**

**Loan      Certificate (1)**

| Applicant                             |   | Shenzhen                BAK Battery Co., Ltd               |
|---------------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------|
| Currency                              |   | RMB                                                        |   | Amount |   | 50,000,000.00 |
| Loan                Term              |   | From                December 12, 2007 to December 12, 2008 |
| Usage                                 |   | Working                Capital                             |
| Annual                rate            |   | 7.29                %                                      |
| Signature                of Applicant |   | Stamp                of Applicant                          |   | Signature                of Shenzhen Development Bank |   | Stamp                of Longgang Branch,** **Shenzhen                Development Bank |
| /s/                Xiangqian Li       |   |                                                       |   | /s/                Tezheng Chen |   |   |

----
# C_2015107EN.01001902.xml

| 30.3.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 107/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.3.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 107/19

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Gerechtshof Amsterdam (Netherlands) lodged on 12 January 2015 —  AK (*1) v Achmea Schadeverzekeringen NV, Stichting Achmea Rechtsbijstand

(Case C-5/15)

(2015/C 107/27)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Gerechtshof Amsterdam

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: AK (*1)

Defendants: Achmea Schadeverzekeringen NV, Stichting Achmea Rechtsbijstand

Question referred

Must the term ‘inquiry or proceedings’ in Article 4(1)(a) of Council Directive 87/344/EEC (1) of 22 June 1987 on the coordination of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to legal expenses insurance be interpreted as also covering the objection stage before the CIZ [Netherlands Medical Care Assessment Centre], in which any person who has received a negative decision from the CIZ on a request for an assessment may lodge a notice of objection with the CIZ, requesting that the decision be reviewed?

---

(*1)  Information erased or replaced within the framework of protection of personal data and/or confidentiality.

(1)  OJ 1987 L 185, p. 77.

---
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should

not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED December 9, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-10103 Summary Calendar

JOSE ANGEL VASQUEZ-CRUZ, Petitioner-Appellant,

versus ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND THE IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondents-Appellees,

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas (USDC No. 1:04-CV-119-C)

_________________________________________________________ Before REAVLEY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * 

### Jose Angel Vasquez-Cruz appeals the district court’s dismissal of his petition for habeas corpus for lack of jurisdiction. We affirm for the following reasons:

### 1. Section 1252(b)(5) of Title 8 is the exclusive statutory method of

determining Vasquez-Cruz’s claim of citizenship; and this claim must be brought as a petition for review of a final order of removal in this Court. Petitioner failed to assert his claim of United States national status in this Court within thirty days of the final order of removal. See U.S.C. § 1252(b)(1). In fact, Vasquez-Cruz formally waived his right to appeal the February 20, 2002 immigration judge’s order of removal and was removed to Mexico on February 21, 2002. The thirty-day deadline for filing a petition for review of a final order of removal is jurisdictional. 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(1); Navarro-Miranda v. Ashcroft , 330 F.3d 672, 676 (5th Cir. 2003). 2. Because we could have determined Vaquez-Cruz’s claim on direct review, and he failed to pursue that avenue of relief before filing his habeas petition in the district court, dismissal of his habeas petition is appropriate. See Lee v. Gonzales , 410 F.3d 778, 785 (5th Cir. 2005). AFFIRMED.
No. 54923.

#### Schlesinger & Gintel, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 160433-K (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

The protest was dismissed.
Rialto
CAPITAL(logo)  2018
Annual Statement of Servicer Compliance (Item 1123)  Pooling
and Servicing Agreement (the “Pooling and Servicing Agreement”) dated as of May 1, 2016 by and among CCRE Commercial
Mortgage Securities, L.P. as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as Master Servicer, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC
as Special Servicer, Park Bridge Lender Services LLC as Operating Advisor and Asset Representations Reviewer, U,S. Bank National
Association as Trustee, Certificate Administrator and Paying Agent, and U.S. Bank National Association as Custodian, relating
to the CFCRE 2016-C4 Mortgage Trust, Commercial Mortgage Pass-through Certificates, Series 2016-C4 (CFCRE 2016-C4)  The undersigned,
a duly authorized officer of Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as special servicer (the “Special Servicer”) herein certifies
to the following:  1.
    All servicing activities and performance of such servicing activities under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement are performed on behalf of the Special Servicer.2.
    A review of the servicing activities and performance by the Special Servicer for the period of January 1, 2018 through December 31, 2018 (the “Reporting Period”), under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement has been conducted under my supervision.3.
    To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Special Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the terms of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period and if there has been a failure to fulfill any such obligations in any material respect, each failure and the nature and status thereof has been specifically identified herein.  Certified by:
    /s/ Adam Singer
    
    Date: March 1, 2019Adam Singer, Managing Director
112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 1421 

AN ACT 

To authorize the Peace Corps Commemorative Foundation 

to establish a commemorative work in the District of 

Columbia and its environs, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 1421 ES

1 SECTION 1. MEMORIAL TO COMMEMORATE AMERICA’S 

2 COMMITMENT TO INTERNATIONAL SERVICE 

3 AND GLOBAL PROSPERITY. 

4 (a) AUTHORIZATION TO ESTABLISH COMMEMORA5 TIVE WORK.—The Peace Corps Commemorative Founda6 tion may establish a commemorative work on Federal land 

7 in the District of Columbia and its environs to commemo8 rate the mission of the Peace Corps and the ideals on 

9 which the Peace Corps was founded. 

10 (b) COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS FOR COMMEMO11 RATIVE WORKS ACT.—The establishment of the com12 memorative work under this section shall be in accordance 

13 with chapter 89 of title 40, United States Code (commonly 

14 known as the ‘‘Commemorative Works Act’’). 

15 (c) USE OF FEDERAL FUNDS PROHIBITED.— 

16 (1) IN GENERAL.—Federal funds may not be 

17 used to pay any expense of the establishment of the 

18 commemorative work under this section. 

19 (2) RESPONSIBILITY OF PEACE CORPS.—The 

20 Peace Corps Commemorative Foundation shall be 

21 solely responsible for acceptance of contributions for, 

22 and payment of the expenses of, the establishment 

23 of the commemorative work under this section. 

24 (d) DEPOSIT OF EXCESS FUNDS.—If, on payment of 

25 all expenses for the establishment of the commemorative 

26 work under this section (including the maintenance and 
3 

†S 1421 ES

1 preservation amount required by section 8906(b)(1) of 

2 title 40, United States Code), or on expiration of the au3 thority for the commemorative work under section 8903(e) 

4 of title 40, United States Code, there remains a balance 

5 of funds received for the establishment of the commemora6 tive work, the Peace Corps Commemorative Foundation 

7 shall transmit the amount of the balance to the Secretary 

8 of the Interior for deposit in the account provided for in 

9 section 8906(b)(3) of title 40, United States Code. 

10 SEC. 2. BUDGETARY EFFECTS. 

11 The budgetary effects of this Act, for the purpose of 

12 complying with the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010, 

13 shall be determined by reference to the latest statement 

14 titled ‘‘Budgetary Effects of PAYGO Legislation’’ for this 

15 Act, submitted for printing in the Congressional Record 

16 by the Chairman of the Senate Budget Committee, pro17 vided that such statement has been submitted prior to the 

18 vote on passage. 

Passed the Senate December 30, 2012. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 
112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 1421 

AN ACT 

To authorize the Peace Corps Commemorative 

for other purposes. in the District of Columbia and its environs, and Foundation to establish a commemorative work
No. 46965.

#### Petition 6211-R of Goldfarb Novelty Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

From the evidence it was found that there was no intention on the part of the petitioner when making the entries to conceal or misrepresent the facts or to defraud the revenue of the United States. The petition was therefore granted.
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID** 

### 07584 **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  

### 07584\07584_Certification Statement.pdf Plant certification statement 

### 07584\07584_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist 

### 07584\07584_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted 

### x 07584\07584_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file 

### x 07584\07584_PartE.xls Plant submitted survey file 

### x 07584\07584_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file 

### x 07584\07584_PlantID_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook 

### x 07584\Supporting Documentation\07584_Arial Map.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### x 07584\Supporting Documentation\07584_Water Balance Diagram.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database
. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
§906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
   (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for
the periods expressed in the Report.
 /s/ John H. MarmadukeJohn H. MarmadukePresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)/s/ Dan CrowDan CrowVice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
 A signed original of this written statement required by §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been
provided to Hastings Entertainment, Inc. and will be retained by Hastings Entertainment, Inc. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission, or its staff, upon request.
Before the Second Division,

October 14, 1942

No. 47635.

#### Protests 60553-K, etc., of Hochschild, Kohn & Co. (Baltimore).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

From an examination of the entire record and the samples in evidence the court was satisfied that the scalloped effects on the articles do not rise to the dignity of trimmings. Therefore, all merchandise invoiced as “Hand knitted infants woolen sacque sets” was held dutiable at 50 percent ad valorem, plus 50 cents per pound under paragraph 1114 (d) and T. D. 49753 as claimed.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 12, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-50264

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

GERMAN NABARRETTE NIETO, also known as Herman Nieto,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas 

USDC No. 6:02-CR-105-2

--------------------

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Counsel appointed to represent German Nabarrette Nieto on

appeal has moved to withdraw pursuant to Anders v. California,

386 U.S. 738 (1967). Nieto has not filed a response. Our

independent review of counsel’s brief and the record discloses no

nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, the motion for leave to

withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See

5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
Source Determinationfor Oil and Gas ExtractionDeliberative -- Do Not DistributeOverviewObjective – Review approach to proposal for oil and gassource determination rule.Brief history of policy.Recent court decisions.Proposal2Deliberative -- Do Not DistributeBrief History of PermittingStationary Source is “any building, structure, facility, orinstallation” which is all of the pollutant-emitting activitiesthat areUnder common controlLocated on one or more contiguous or adjacent propertiesBelong to the same major industrial grouping (2-digit SIC code)1980 PSD Regulations – source mustCarry out the purposes of PSDApproximate a “common sense notion of a plant”Avoid aggregating unless fit within terms building, structure,facility installationAlso said we did not intend to encompass activities along a “longline” operation such as power line or pipeline3Deliberative -- Do Not DistributeBrief History of Permitting (cont.)Determining “source” a case-by-case analysisIn making these determinations we have:Evaluated contractual relationships to determinewhether common control exists– Landfills and landfill gas-to-energyIncluded support facilities even if different SIC codes– Coal mines and power plantsConsidered sources to be “adjacent” if they arefunctionally interrelated4Deliberative -- Do Not DistributePermitting Oil and Gas2007 – Memo “Source Determination for Oil andGas Industries”Begin by determining whether individual surface sitesare majorAggregate 2 or more surface sites only if undercommon control and are located in close proximity2009 Memo- withdrew 2007 memoExamine all three criteria, make a case-by-casedetermination5Deliberative -- Do Not DistributeOil and Gas DeterminationsKerr-McGee Frederick Compressor StationGranted title V petition because Colorado did provide anadequate rationale for its source determinationBP Florida River Compressor StationEPA did not aggregate compressor station and wellsWEG Petition – settledSummit PetroleumEPA aggregated gas sweetening plant and wells for title VpermitChallenged in 6thCircuit6thCircuit said we could not consider “interrelatedness” inaccessing adjacency– Must be physically proximate to be considered “adjacent”6Deliberative -- Do Not DistributeSource Determination RuleProvide clarity for sources and permittingauthoritiesPropose at the same time as the equipmentspecific emissions standards (NSPS and CTG)The pre-construction permit review process is arguablyless necessary if all significant individual pieces ofequipment are well-controlledAt this time, propose only for oil and gasextraction7Deliberative -- Do Not DistributeProposalPropose two options, stating a preference forlimited “aggregation” (Option 1)Option 1: Define “adjacent” as limited by proximity– Similar to Clean Air Act limitations on aggregation for thisindustry in toxics provisions– Propose 1⁄4 mile as radius, take comment on other distances– Consistent with Summit decisionOption 2: Define “adjacent” as including adetermination of functional interrelatedness– Consistent with historic practice, practice for other industries8Deliberative -- Do Not DistributeQuestions?9Deliberative -- Do Not Distribute
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### International Trade Commission

          - [USITC SE-07-008] 

# Agency Holding The Meeting:

United States International Trade Commission. 

# Time and Date:

May 15, 2007 at 11 a.m. 

# Place:

Room 101, 500 E Street,  SW., Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: (202) 205-2000. 

# Status:

Open to the public. 

# Matters to be Considered:

 

1. Agenda for future meetings: None. 

2. Minutes. 

3. Ratification List. 

4. Inv. No. 731-TA-1104 (Final) (Certain Polyester Staple Fiber from China)—briefing and vote. (The Commission is currently scheduled to transmit its determination and Commissioners' opinions to the Secretary of Commerce on or before May 24, 2007.)

5. Outstanding action jackets: None.

In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the agenda of the following meeting. 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: May 7, 2007. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. E7-9088 Filed 5-9-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
Finding of No Significant Impact Solar Technology Center 

January 2009 
Finding of No Significant Impact Solar Technology Center 

January 2009 
Finding of No Significant Impact Solar Technology Center 

January 2009