alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>



Exhibit 32

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Advanced Technology Industries, Inc., on
Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on May 18, 2004 (the "Report"), the undersigned, Hans
Joachim Skrobanek, President of the Company, and James Samuelson, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13
                  (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


Date:   July 13, 2004                 /s/ Hans Joachim Skrobanek
                                      ----------------------------------------
                                      Hans Joachim Skrobanek, President

Date:   July 13, 2004                 /s/ James Samuelson
                                      ----------------------------------------
                                      James Samuelson, Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1


                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                                (18 U.S.C. 1350)


     In connection with the Report of Competitive Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 31, 2010, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
John B. Nano, Chairman, President, Chief Executive Officer, Interim Chief
Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that to my
knowledge:

     1.   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
          or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


                                   /s/ John B. Nano
                                   ----------------
                                   John B. Nano
                                   Chairman, President, Chief Executive Officer,
                                   Interim Chief Financial Officer and Chief
                                   Accounting Officer

                                   Date: March 16, 2010


                  *
                *****
              **-----**
            **-----       COMPETITIVE
          ****----        TECHNOLOGIES
            **=====       Unlocking the Potential of Innovation (R)
              **=====**
                *****
                  *  (R)  Technology Transfer and Licensing Services




                            www.competitivetech.net


                                    Page 29
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of  Medina Coffee, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2003, as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),I, Harry Miller, President, CEO, CFO and sole Director and Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the *Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*, that:

- The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)  of the  Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ; and
- The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|  Date: November 10, 2003 | /s/ Harry Miller    _____________________________    Harry Miller, President, CEO, CFO, and Sole Director & Officer
A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906 has been provided to Medina Coffee, Inc. and will be retained byMedina Coffee, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission orits staff upon request. 

The foregoing certification is being furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission and shall not be considered filed as part ofthe Form 10-QSB. |
|-------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
No. 6408.

#### HAIGHT AND RUSHA, LIQUIDATORS OF FITZPATRICK-DUNN REALTY COMPANY, vs. MARRERO LAND & IMPROVEMENT ASS’N., LTD.

Syllabus.

A real estate broker does not earn his commission for procuring a sale of the property by obtaining for the owner a mere executory agreement, not specifically enforceable, and from which tlie prospective purchaser in fact withdraws by forfeiting the “earnest money” deposited by him.

*370Appeal from the 28th Judicial District Court, Parish of Jefferson, No. 1642. Plonorable P. E. Edrington, Judge.

Lyle Saxon, for plaintiff and appellant.

L. H. Marrero, Jr., for defendant .and appellee.

His Honor, EMILE GODCHAUX,

rendered the opinion and decree of the Court, as follows:

Plaintiff, a real estate brokerage concern now in liquidation, appeals from a judgment rejecting its claim for compensation or a stipulated commission for having procured .a purchaser for defendant’s property.

The facts are that defendant and the prospective purchaser entered into an executory agreement of sale which was accompanied by the payment to defendant of five hundred dollars, the parties stipulating that “said five hundred dollars is to be forfeited if acts of sale as per contract this day signed are not passed within a reasonable time.” The purchaser failed for lack of funds to carry out the undertaking to purchase the .property, and this five hundred dollars as well as an additional amount subsequently paid to defendant were declared forfeited, the purchaser acquiescing in this action.

There is no doubt but that the sum of plaintiff’s services as broker consisted in procuring a mere “earnest money” .agreement, one'not specifically enforceable and one wherein the purchaser in fact exercised its option to withdraw. This is not only apparent from the face of the agreement and accompanying receipt, but is rendered certain by the testimony of every witness, each of whom testifies that all parties considered and treated the transaction .as one in which the purchaser was at liberty to withdraw upon forfeiting the amount paid.

*371Opinion and decree, June 14th, 1915.

Rehearing refused, June 30th, 1915.

And the further fact is clearly established not only by this testimony but also by the conduct of the parties exhibited in this as well as in their past transactions, that it w.as never for a moment contemplated that the plaintiff would earn or would be entitled to receive a brokerage commission unless and until an actual sale of the property should be finally consummated.

The case is similar to one wherein we recently held that a broker, promised a commission for making a sale, does not earn his compensation where the prospective purchaser procured by him exercises his right of forfeiting the earnest money and withdrawing from the executory agreement of purchase.

Sonneman vs. Cutler, No. 5727 of our docket (Vol. X, Ct. of Ap., 155).

We perceive no error in the judgment and it is accordingly affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

St. Paul, J., concurs in the decree.
H. Con. Res. 378 Agreed to October 2, 2008

One Hundred Tenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and eight 

Concurrent Resolution 

Whereas the Wyoming Territorial Legislature passed, and Governor 

John A. Campbell signed into law on December 10, 1869, a 

measure stating, ‘‘That every woman of the age of twenty-one 

years, residing in this territory, may, at every election, to be 

holden under the law thereof, cast her vote.’’; 

Whereas this Suffrage Act granted women in the Wyoming Territory 

the right to vote with full civil and judicial equality to men; 

Whereas Louisa Swain, on September 6, 1870, became the Nation’s 

first woman voter under laws guaranteeing absolute political 

equality to women; 

Whereas she cast that vote as a 70 year-old woman in the town 

of Laramie’s municipal election; 

Whereas, the Laramie Daily Sentinel wrote, ‘‘It is comforting to 

note that our first woman voter was really a lady . . . of the 

highest social standing in the community, universally beloved 

and respected. The scene was in the highest degree interesting 

and impressive. There was too much good sense in our community 

for any jeers or sneers to be seen on such an occasion’’; 

Whereas this vote was inspirational to the women’s suffrage movement and to the cause of civil rights; 

Whereas, Wyoming’s statehood, in 1890, brought the codification 

of this suffrage right through the ratification of the new Wyoming 

State constitution under Article 6, section 1; 

Whereas, when the Congress threatened to withhold statehood from 

Wyoming, territory legislators replied with a telegram stating 

that Wyoming would remain out of the Union 100 years rather 

than join without women’s suffrage; 

Whereas President Benjamin Harrison, on July 10, 1890, signed 

into law a bill admitting Wyoming into the Union, and recognizing 

it as the Nation’s ‘‘Equality State’’; 

Whereas these actions instigated a path to the passage of the 

19th Amendment to the United States Constitution 50 years 

after Louisa Swain’s historical first vote; and 

Whereas September 6, 2008, would be an appropriate date to designate as Louisa Swain Day: Now, therefore, be it 
H. Con. Res. 378—2 

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), That Congress supports the designation of a Louisa Swain 

Day. 

Attest: 

Clerk of the House of Representatives. 

Attest: 

Secretary of the Senate.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Air national guardsman uses Defense Logistics Agency reutilization program to save millions of dollars

By Master Sgt. Andrew Moseley, 177th Fighter Wing – NJ Air National GuardDisposition Services

                Egg Harbor Township, New Jersey  –              DLA’s public websiteDLA Disposition Services Reutilization Program

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT
#### SOUTHWEST FLORIDA AREA LOCAL AMERICAN POSTAL WORKERS UNION AFL-CIO, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 04-16165.

Non-Argument Calendar

D.C. Docket No. 03-00206-CV-FTM-29-SPC.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

June 27, 2005.

Andrew Froman, Brown, Clark, Christopher & Demay, P.A., Sarasota, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Todd B. Grandy, Linda Julin McNamara, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Tampa, FL, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before HULL, WILSON and COX, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The American Postal Workers Union appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the United States Postal Service. The Union filed a class action grievance in response to the Postal Service’s announcement that employee breaks at the Fort Myers, Florida Post Office would be cut from fifteen minutes to ten. An arbitrator found in favor of the Union, and the Union filed this action to confirm and enforce the arbitration award. The Union brought this action pursuant to the Postal Reorganization Act of 1970, codified at 39 U.S.C. § 1208(b). Section 1208(b) of the Act is analogous to section 301(a) of the Labor Management Relations Act, codified at 29 U.S.C. § 185(a). The district court therefore concluded that the Union’s action to enforce its award was barred by the six months statute of limitations period contained in 29 U.S.C. § 160(b). Accordingly, the district court granted summary judgment in favor of the Postal Service.

On appeal, the Union contends that the district court erred in applying the six *155month statute of limitations contained in 29 U.S.C. § 160(b). Rather, the Union argues that this action is governed by-Florida’s five year statute of limitations. *See.*Fla. Stat. § 684.24(8)(a) and § 95.11(2)(b). Chapter 684 of the Florida Statutes, however, concerns arbitrations involving international affairs, not arbitrations involving labor relations. Our precedent instructs us that a suit to enforce a favorable arbitration award is a section 301 claim, and that the character of such a claim compels a finding that federal law should apply. *Samples v. Ryder Truck Lines, Inc.,*755 F.2d 881, 884 (11th Cir.1985). Our precedent also instructs that in a straightforward section 301 claim a party has six months in which to seek to enforce an arbitration award. *See id.*at 888. This action pursuant to the Postal Reorganization Act is analogous to a straightforward section 301 claim. The district court, therefore, correctly determined that the six month statute of limitations applies to the Union’s claim in this case. (R-40 at 11-12.) Our binding precedent compels this result.

The Union also contends on appeal that the doctrine of equitable estoppel should bar the Postal Service from prevailing on its statute of limitations defense. The district court correctly rejected this argument, as it is unsupported by the record. (R-40 at 10-11.)

The district court’s judgment dismissing the Union’s action as time-barred is, therefore,

AFFIRMED.
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1359 

To make the National Parks and Federal Recreational Lands Pass available 

at a discount to members of the Armed Forces and veterans. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 13, 2011 

Mr. TESTER (for himself and Mr. BEGICH) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural 

Resources 

A BILL 

To make the National Parks and Federal Recreational Lands 

Pass available at a discount to members of the Armed 

Forces and veterans. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Honoring Service 

5 Through National Park Access Act’’. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1359 IS

1 SEC. 2. NATIONAL PARKS AND FEDERAL RECREATIONAL 

2 LANDS PASS FOR MEMBERS OF THE ARMED 

3 FORCES AND VETERANS. 

4 Section 805(b) of division J of the Consolidated Ap5 propriations Act, 2005 (16 U.S.C. 6804(b)), is amended 

6 by adding at the end the following: 

7 ‘‘(3) MILITARY DISCOUNT.— 

8 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall 

9 make the National Parks and Federal Rec10 reational Lands Pass available to any member 

11 of the uniformed services or any member of the 

12 National Guard or Reserves at a reduced rate 

13 equal to 50 percent of the cost of the National 

14 Parks and Federal Recreational Lands Pass to 

15 the public established under subsection (a)(5). 

16 ‘‘(B) TERM.—A National Parks and Fed17 eral Recreational Lands Pass issued under this 

18 paragraph shall be valid for 1 year after the 

19 date of issuance of the pass. 

20 ‘‘(4) VETERAN DISCOUNT.— 

21 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall 

22 make the National Parks and Federal Rec23 reational Lands Pass available, at a cost of 

24 $10, to any veteran who was separated from 

25 military service under conditions other than dis26 honorable, if the veteran provides proof of that 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 1359 IS

1 status by providing a copy of the Certificate of 

2 Release or Discharge from Active Duty (De3 partment of Defense Form DD214) or valid 

4 military retiree identification card of the vet5 eran. 

6 ‘‘(B) TERM.—A National Parks and Fed7 eral Recreational Lands Pass issued under this 

8 paragraph shall be valid for the lifetime of the 

9 passholder.’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         294,187
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   41,591
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     10,863
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               364,518
<PP&E>                                       8,352,012
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,662,479
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,123,511
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          641,683
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       791,782
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,032,290
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,123,511
<SALES>                                         86,378
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               557,917
<CGS>                                           48,790
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  483,893
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              48,222
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 74,024
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             74,024
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    74,024
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .05
        

</TABLE>
No. 42025.

#### Protest 948581-G of Montgomery Ward & Co. *(New*York).

Opinion by

Sullivan, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of microscope sets the same as those passed upon in *United States*v. *Wolf*(26 C. C. P. A. 243, C. A. D. 23) and held dutiable at 45 percent under paragraph 228 (b). As there was no claim made under this paragraph the protest was overruled. Brown, J., dissented.
No. 55511.

#### Liberty Fabrics of N. Y., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 159373-K (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

The protest was dismissed.
Before the Third Division,

July 26, 1938

No. 39106.

#### Protest 938909-G of American Express Co. (Boston).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

On the record presented the protest was overruled.
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 22-60295

Christopher Maurice McDowell, 

Plaintiff—Appellant,

versus

Carlton W. Reeves, 

Defendant—Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 3:21-cv-00722

Before Jones, Haynes, and Oldham, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

After carefully reviewing the record and the brief filed by Christopher 

Maurice McDowell, we conclude that no non-frivolous issue is presented for 

review. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. Appeal DISMISSED.

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

November 28, 2022

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 22-60295 Document: 00516557525 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/28/2022
Michigan Supreme 

Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 12, 2016

Order 

September 12, 2016

151051(85)

CITY OF COLDWATER,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v

CONSUMERS ENERGY COMPANY,

Defendant-Appellant.

SC: 151051

COA: 320181

Branch CC: 13-040185-CZ

________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of amicus curiae Michigan Electric 

Cooperative Association to file a reply to the brief of amicus curiae Michigan Public 

Service Commission is DENIED. The amicus reply submitted on September 9, 2016, is 

not accepted for filing.