alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 46378.

#### Protest 967566-G of Wm. Shaland (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the articles in question are similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 44028 the so-called jump sticks or trick paddles were held dutiable at 33% percent under paragraph 412 as claimed.
Exhibit 32.2**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, I, Scott C. Mahan, Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer, certify that: 1. To my knowledge, this report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. To my knowledge, the information in this report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of BSQUARE Corporation as ofDecember 31, 2006.Date: February 15, 2007        /s/ Scott C. Mahan Scott C. Mahan     Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA

Present: Judges Benton, Coleman and Willis

ROBERT C. TINDALL MEMORANDUM OPINION * v. Record No. 2776-96-1 PER CURIAM SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 LYNNE L. TINDALL

FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH Alan E. Rosenblatt, Judge (Moody E. Stallings, Jr.; Kevin E. Martin-Gayle; Stallings & Richardson, on brief), for appellant. (Glenn R. Croshaw; T. Scott McGraw; Willcox & Savage, on brief), for appellee.

Robert C. Tindall (husband) appeals the decision of the circuit court denying his motion to reduce the monthly spousal support he pays to Lynne L. Tindall (wife). Husband contends that the trial court erred in finding that he failed to prove a material change in circumstances, warranting a reduction in spousal support. Upon reviewing the record and briefs of the parties, we conclude that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we summarily affirm the decision of the trial court.

See Rule 5A:27. As the party seeking a modification of spousal support pursuant to Code § 20-109, husband bore the burden "to prove both a material change in circumstances and that this change warrants

* Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not designated for publication.2 a modification of support." Schoenwetter v. Schoenwetter , 8 Va. App. 601, 605, 383 S.E.2d 28, 30 (1989). Husband stipulated that he remained able to pay $4,000 a month in spousal support as previously ordered. He argued, however, that wife had reduced her monthly expenses, and that the reduction in her needs constituted changed circumstances warranting a decrease in

support. According to the statement of facts, the evidence

established that wife sold the former marital residence which she had received upon entry of the final decree of divorce. She used the proceeds from the sale to purchase a condominium, thereby eliminating her mortgage payments. Wife testified that this action was a form of "estate planning" designed to hold down her monthly expenses. The evidence also proved that when wife's monthly mortgage payment ceased, her tax liability increased by $300 to $400 per month because she could no longer claim the related interest deduction. Furthermore, the statement of facts recites that "[w]ith other expenses increasing and the loss of the mortgage deduction, the expenses of the [wife] had not changed significantly since 1992." On this evidence the trial court found that husband failed to prove that there had been a material change in circumstances.

Because the statement of facts recites evidence that supports the order, the judgment of the trial court is summarily3 affirmed. Affirmed.
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v ADOLFO H. JIMENEZ, Private E-2, U. S. Army, Appellant

8 USCMA 594, 25 CMR 98

No. 10,729

Decided January 10, 1958

*Colonel Edward M. O’Connell*was on the brief for Appellant, Accused.

*Lieutenant Colonel John G. Lee*and *First Lieutenant Jay D. Fischer*were on the brief for Appellee, United States.

Opinion of the Court

HOMER FERGUSON, Judge:

The accused was found guilty by general court-martial of desertion terminated by surrender, in violation of Article 85, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 885. After instructing the court on the elements of the offense of desertion and of the lesser included offense of absence without leave, the law officer advised as follows:

> “. . . [A]n intent ... to remain permanently absent may be proved by . . . facts and circumstances from which, according to the common experience of mankind, such an intent may reasonably be inferred, such as evidence of a much prolonged period of absence without authority, *for which there is no satisfactory explanation*and that the accused surrendered at a considerable distance from his station.” [Emphasis supplied.]

The instruction was similar to that in United States v Soccio, 8 USCMA 477, 24 CMR 287, in which this Court held such an instruction to be both erroneous and prejudicial. The conviction must, therefore, be set aside. The record is returned to The Judge Advocate General of the Army for reference to a board of review. The board, in its discretion, may affirm the lesser offense of absence without leave and reassess the sentence or it may order a rehearing on the desertion charge.

Chief Judge Quinn concurs.

Judge Latimer dissents.
U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE

WASHINGTON : 

1 

89–012 2018

115th Congress, 2d Session – – – – – – – – – – – – House Document 115–160 

DESIGNATION OF FUNDING AS AN EMERGENCY 

REQUIREMENT 

COMMUNICATION 

FROM

THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES 

TRANSMITTING

DESIGNATION OF FUNDING AS AN EMERGENCY REQUIREMENT, 

PURSUANT TO PUBLIC LAW 115–254, DIV I 

OCTOBER 9, 2018.—Referred to the Committee on Appropriations and 

ordered to be printed 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with REPORTSE:\Seals\Congress.#13

lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with REPORTS
(1) 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

Washington, October 5, 2018. 

Hon. PAUL D. RYAN, 

Speaker of the House of Representatives, 

Washington, DC. 

DEAR MR. SPEAKER: In accordance with division I of the FAA Reauthorization Act of 2018 (H.R. 302; the ‘‘Act’’), I hereby designate 

as an emergency requirement the amount (including the transfer 

of funds) so designated by the Congress in the Act pursuant to section 251(b)(2)(A) of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit 

Control Act of 1985, for the Community Development Fund. 

The details of this action are set forth in the enclosed memorandum from the Director of the Office of Management and Budget. 

Sincerely, 

DONALD J. TRUMP. 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with REPORTS

lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with REPORTS
(3) 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with REPORTSInsert offset folio 3 here HD160.001
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 325 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 325

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 22, 2008

        Received and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
  Celebrating the 50th Anniversary of the Mackinac Island State Park 
Commission's Historical Preservation and Museum Program, which began on 
                 June 15, 1958, and for other purposes.

Whereas the Mackinac Island State Park Commission was created, in 1895, to care 
        for and manage Mackinac Island State Park;
Whereas Michilimackinac State Park and Mill Creek State Park were later added to 
        the family of parks and historic sites under the authority of the 
        Commission;
Whereas, in 1958, Michigan granted authority to the Commission to restore and 
        interpret Fort Mackinac and other historical properties at the Straits 
        of Mackinac;
Whereas, in 1958, the Commission began restoration, installed exhibits, and 
        opened Fort Mackinac to the public;
Whereas, in 1959, the Commission began archaeological excavation of Colonial 
        Michilimackinac and opened it to the public one year later;
Whereas, in 1984, the Commission opened Historic Mill Creek Discovery Park;
Whereas, in 2004, after 14 years of being closed, Old Mackinac Point Lighthouse 
        was reopened with an ongoing restoration program;
Whereas, for 50 years, the Commission has professionally and successfully 
        developed, promoted, and improved the Mackinac State Historic Parks 
        complex, which has been continuously recognized by the American 
        Association of Museums; and
Whereas the Mackinac State Historic Parks complex has hosted more than 
        10,000,000 visitors since 1958, making it one of the most successful 
        historic site complexes in North America and an important contributor to 
        the tourism economy of northern Michigan: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That Congress--
            (1) celebrates the 50th anniversary of the Mackinac Island 
        State Park Commission's Historical Preservation and Museum 
        Program; and
            (2) respectfully requests the Clerk of the House of 
        Representatives to transmit an enrolled copy of this resolution 
        to the Mackinac Island State Park Commission as evidence of the 
        Commission successfully fulfilling its mission to protect, 
        preserve, and present the historical and natural wonders of 
        Mackinac Island.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 21, 2008.

            Attest:

                                            LORRAINE C. MILLER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Exhibit 11.1
                          COMPETITIVE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
                     Schedule of Computation of Earnings Per Share   
                                      (Unaudited)          


                                                             Quarter
                                                         ended October 31,
                                                        1996           1995


Net loss applicable to common stock                 $  (474,274)   $ (174,208)


Common and common equivalent shares -
    primary:
  Weighted average common shares
    outstanding                                      5,903,100      5,813,952
  Adjustments for assumed exercise of
    stock options                                       68,006*         5,255*
  Adjustments for assumed exercise of
    stock warrants                                      22,685*            --
  Weighted average number of common and
    common equivalent shares outstanding             5,993,791      5,819,207

Common and common equivalent shares -
    fully diluted:
  Weighted average common shares
    outstanding                                      5,903,100      5,813,952
  Adjustments for assumed exercise of
    stock options                                       81,214*        14,924*
  Adjustments for assumed exercise of
    stock warrants                                      27,609*            --
  Weighted average number of common and
    common equivalent shares outstanding             6,011,923      5,828,876


    Primary and fully diluted                       $    (0.08)    $    (0.03)


* Anti-dilutive.




These calculations are submitted in accordance with Regulation S-K item 601
(b) (11) which differs from the requirements of paragraph 40 of Accounting
Principles Board Opinion No. 15 because they produce an anti-dilutive result.
No. 70-4

#### Edmund N. Stout, Jr., PFC, U. S. Marine Corps v United States.

Petitioner has submitted a Petition for Appropriate Extraordinary Relief. He avers that on April 4, 1969, a general court-martial convened in Vietnam convicted him of several offenses and sentenced him to a bad conduct discharge, confinement at hard labor for eight years, total forfeitures and reduction to Private E-l. At the time of submitting his Petition, petitioner was confined at the Naval Disciplinary Command, Portsmouth, New Hampshire, despite failure of the convening authority to take any action upon his sentence pursuant to Article 60, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 860.

In its response to our Order to Show Cause, respondent advises that the convening authority has disapproved the findings and the sentence and has ordered the charges dismissed; that on February 9, 1970, petitioner was restored to duty and transferred to Marine Corps Base, Quantico. Neither petitioner nor his defense counsel challenge the facts set out in the Response.

Accordingly, it appearing that the issue presented is moot, it is, by the Court, this 26th day of February, 1970,

ORDERED:

That said Petition be, and the same is, hereby dismissed.
# C_2018032EN.01003101.xml

| 29.1.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 32/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.1.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 32/31

---

Order of the General Court of 26 November 2017 — Federcaccia Toscana and Others v Commission

(Case T-562/15) (1)

1

((Environment - Conservation of wild birds - Species which may be hunted - Conditions to be complied with by national laws on hunting - Harmonisation of the criteria for the application of Article 7(4) of Directive 2009/147/EC - Closed period for hunting in Tuscany))

(2018/C 032/42)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Federcaccia Toscana (Florence, Italy) and the five other applicants whose names are set out in the annex to the order (represented by: A. Bruni, lawyer)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Gattinara and C. Hermes, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application based on Article 265 TFEU seeking a declaration that the Commission unlawfully failed to update certain Italian data in the document on key concepts, established by the ORNIS Committee, which is provided for in Directive 2009/147/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 November 2009 on the conservation of wild birds (OJ 2010 L 20, p. 7); application based on Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of the Commission’s letter of 6 October 2014 stating that the extension in Italy of the hunting season for certain species of bird is incompatible with EU law; and application based on Article 268 TFEU seeking compensation for the damage allegedly suffered by the applicants as a result of the Commission’s failure to update the Italian data.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed.

| 2. | Federcaccia Toscana and the other applicants whose names are set out in the annex shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Federcaccia Toscana and the other applicants whose names are set out in the annex shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 381, 16.11.2015.

1

---
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Commercial Mortgage  Servicing**D1050-084, 8th Fl  401 South Tryon Street.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|--------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

  

Reference is hereby made tothat certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of March 1, 2016, by andamong WELLS FARGO COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES, INC., as Depositor, WELLSFARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as General Master Servicer, RIALTO CAPITALADVISORS, LLC as General Special Servicer, NATIONAL COOPERATIVE BANK, N.A., asNCB Master Servicer and as NCB Special Servicer, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONALASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator, WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONALASSOCIATION, as Trustee and PARK BRIDGE LENDER SERVICES LLC, as OperatingAdvisor and as Asset Representations Reviewer, with respect to CommercialMortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2016-C33 (the "Agreement").Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meaningsassigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 11.09 ofthis Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of CommercialMortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1.           A review of the activities of the General Master Servicer during the periodfrom March 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016 (the “ReportingPeriod”), and of its performance per the Agreement during such period hasbeen made under my supervision, and 

 

2.           To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the General Master Servicerhas fulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement in all materialrespects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, theundersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2017.

 

 

/s/Daniel Bober

Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President

Wells Fargo Bank

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll  go far |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------|
No. 65753.

#### Bruce Duncan Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 60/10658 (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel that the weight of the pieces short landed was 44.27 pounds and that an allowance of only 38.4 pounds was made in the liquidation of the entry, it was held that an allowance should be made for the 5.87 pounds for which no previous allowance was made.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1996
<CASH>                                              56
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,362
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (110)
<INVENTORY>                                        232
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,911
<PP&E>                                             284
<DEPRECIATION>                                     233
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,963
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,101
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           852
<OTHER-SE>                                       (990)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,963
<SALES>                                          4,783
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,783
<CGS>                                            4,031
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,031
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   664
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    26
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  12
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     50
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 50
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        50
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01
        

</TABLE>
LUIS RODRIGUEZ,

Appellant,

v.

SEARS HOLDINGS 

CORPORATIONS AND 

SEDGWICK CMS,

Appellees.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D14-1297

_____________________________/

Opinion filed December 2, 2014.

An appeal from an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims.

Margret G. Kerr, Judge.

Date of Accident: November 26, 1996.

Mark L. Zientz of the Law Offices of Mark L. Zientz, P.A., Miami, for Appellant.

Mary L. Wakeman of Heuler-Wakeman Law Group, P.L., Tallahassee, for 

Appellees.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Harrell v. Fla. Construction Specialists, 834 So. 2d 352, 

356 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003) (“We hold that the termination of supplemental benefits 
pursuant to . . . section 440.15(1)(f)1., Florida Statutes (1995) is not a reverse offset 

pursuant to section 440.15(10) . . . .”).

BENTON, WETHERELL, and SWANSON, JJ., CONCUR.

2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from B.B.
Walker's Form 10-Q for the third quarter ended and nine months ended August 2,
1997 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000104218
<NAME> B.B. WALKER COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-02-1997
<CASH>                                               1
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,890
<ALLOWANCES>                                       486
<INVENTORY>                                      9,530
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                17,500
<PP&E>                                           8,006
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,150
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  19,532
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           12,078
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         83
<COMMON>                                         1,727
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,443
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    19,532
<SALES>                                         23,290
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                23,344
<CGS>                                           17,244
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   22,790
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     2
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   187
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 930
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (378)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (100)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (278)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (278)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.16)
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   Exhibit 21

                          PROVANT, Inc. Subsidiaries


PROVANT Services, Inc.*
Solution Selling, Inc.*
Educational Discoveries, Inc.*
PROVANT Utah, Inc.*
Sales Performance International, Inc.*
Project Mentors, Inc.*
KC Resources Creative Solutions,Inc.**
MOHR Retail Learning Systems, Inc.**
Star Mountain, Inc.**
Gulliver Ritchie Associates, Inc.**
Behavioral Technology, Inc.***
Decker Communications,Inc.***
Learning Systems Sciences, Inc.****
J. Howard & Associates, Inc.****
Star Media, Inc.+
Star Digital, Inc.+
Novations Group, Inc.+
Strategic Interactive, Inc.+
American Media Incorporated ++
Project Management Services, Inc.+++
Executive Perspectives, Inc.++++



Legend
*        wholly owned subsidiary of PROVANT, Inc.
**       wholly owned subsidiary of PROVANT Utah, Inc.
***      wholly owned subsidiary of KC Resources Creative Solutions, Inc.
****     wholly owned subsidiary of MOHR Retail Learning Systems, Inc.
+        wholly owned subsidiary of Star Mountain, Inc.
++       wholly owned subsidiary of Gulliver Ritchie Associates, Inc..
+++      wholly owned subsidiary of PMSI Acquisition Corp., itself a wholly
         owned subsidiary of PROVANT, Inc.
++++     subsidiary of Gulliver Ritchie Associates, Inc.

     All of PROVANT's direct and indirect subsidiaries are Delaware corporations
except Project  Management  Services,  Inc. (GA) and American Media Incorporated
(IA).