alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1287 

To treat gold and silver coins used as legal tender in the same manner 

as United States currency for taxation purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 28, 2011 

Mr. DEMINT (for himself, Mr. LEE, and Mr. PAUL) introduced the following 

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To treat gold and silver coins used as legal tender in the 

same manner as United States currency for taxation 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Sound Money Pro5 motion Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. GOLD AND SILVER COINS THAT ARE LEGAL TENDER 

7 NOT SUBJECT TO TAXATION. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Gold and silver coins declared 

9 legal tender by the Federal Government or any State gov10 ernment shall not be subject to taxation. 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1287 IS

1 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 1(h)(5) of 

2 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended— 

3 (1) by striking ‘‘(as defined in section 408(m) 

4 without regard to paragraph (3) thereof)’’ in sub5 paragraph (A), and 

6 (2) by adding at the end the following new sub7 paragraph: 

8 ‘‘(C) COLLECTIBLE.—For purposes of this 

9 paragraph, the term ‘collectible’ has the mean10 ing given such term by section 408(m), deter11 mined without regard to subparagraphs (A)(iii), 

12 (A)(iv), and (B).’’. 

13 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The provisions of, and 

14 amendments made by, this section shall take effect on the 

15 date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
(V. D. 69)

#### Gramercy Import Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States

Entry No. 42059, etc.

(Decided March 12, 1958)

*John D. Rode*for the plaintiffs.

*George-Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Lawrence, Judge:

This valuation proceeding arose by virtue of judgments issued by the second division of this court in the cases of *Gramercy Import Co., Inc., et al.*v. *United States,*38 Cust. Ct. 480, Abstract 60688; *id.*v. *id.,*38 Cust. Ct. 481, Abstract 60689; and *Gramercy Import Co., Inc.*v. *United States,*38 Cust. Ct. 481, Abstract 60690, wherein the matters were remanded to a single judge sitting in reappraisement, pursuant to the provisions of title 28, U. S. C. § 2636 (d).

The parties to this proceeding have stipulated and agreed as follows:

> 1. That the merchandise consists of instruments and cases which were held by the Court in Abstracts 60688, 60689, 60690 to be subject to appraisement separately according to the value of each class of article.

> 2. That the market value or the price of the instruments and cases herein at the time of exportation of such merchandise to the United States at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade for exportation to the United States including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition packed ready for shipment to the United States was as set forth below.

> [Statistical listing of market values or prices was here set forth.]

> 3. That there was no higher foreign value.

> 4. That the instant cases may be submitted on the foregoing stipulation.

Upon tbe agreed facts, I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. § 1402 (d)), is the proper basis for determining the value of the drawing instruments and cases therefor covered by the remands of protests enumerated in the schedule attached to and forming part of this decision, and that said value is as shown in paragraph 2 of the above-quoted stipulation.

I further find such values to be the proper dutiable values of said merchandise.

Judgment will issue accordingly.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 

In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) announces the aforementioned meeting. 

*Time and Date:*                         12:30 p.m.-4:30 p.m., May 25, 2007 (Closed).                     

*Place:*                         Teleconference.                     

*Status:*                         The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with provisions set forth in Section 552b(c)(4) and (6), Title 5 U.S.C., and the Determination of the Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, CDC, pursuant to Public Law 92-463.                     

*Matters to be Discussed:*                         The meeting will include the review, discussion, and evaluation of “Behavioral Assessments and Rapid HIV Testing Among African American Adolescents and Adults, Men Who Have Sex With Men and Other Groups at Risk for HIV Infection,” FOA Number PS 07-001, and “Rapid HIV Testing in Community Mental Health Settings Serving African Americans,” FOA PS 07-005.                     

*Contact Person For More Information:*                         J. Felix Rogers, Ph.D., M.P.H., Scientific Review Administrator, Extramural Research Program Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road, NE, MS                               ( print page 25318)                            E05, Atlanta, GA 30333, telephone 404.639.6101.                     

                        The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been delegated the authority to sign                         **Federal Register**                         notices pertaining to announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, for both CDC and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.                     

Dated: April 27, 2007. 

Elaine L. Baker, 

Acting Director, Management Analysis and Services Office Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

 [FR Doc. E7-8617 Filed 5-3-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED APRIL 29, 2021

NO. 03

- 19

- 00529

- CV

Peter Leavitt , Appellant

v.

McLane Company, Inc. , Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 169TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE, JUS TICE S BAKER AND TRIANA

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE BAKER

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the tr i a l cour t on May 10, 2019

. Having reviewed

the record and the parties’ arguments, the C ourt holds that there was no reversible error in the

judgment

. Therefore, the C ourt affirms the trial court’s judgment

. A ppellant shall pay all costs

relating t o this appeal, both in this Court and in the court below.
# C_2015127EN.01004101.xml

| 20.4.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 127/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.4.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 127/41

---

Action brought on 3 February 2015 — ZZ v Commission

(Case F-20/15)

(2015/C 127/57)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: M. Velardo, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

The annulment of the decision not to include the applicant on the list of officials proposed for promotion to grade AD 13 in the context of the 2014 promotion exercise.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Declare the illegality of the Commission Decision of 16 December 2013 laying down general provisions giving effect to Article 45 and the subsequent Communication to the Commission of 18 December 2013 amending the rules on the composition of the cabinets of the Members of the Commission and spokespersons; |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare the illegality of the Commission Decision of 16 December 2013 laying down general provisions giving effect to Article 45 and the subsequent Communication to the Commission of 18 December 2013 amending the rules on the composition of the cabinets of the Members of the Commission and spokespersons;

| — | Annul the subsequent decision of the appointing authority, notified on 24 June 2014, not to include the applicant on the list of officials proposed for promotion to grades AD 13 in the context of the 2014 annual promotion exercise provided for Article 45 of the Staff Regulations, to the extent that that decision does not consider the applicant as having special responsibilities resulting in his categorisation in a role of ‘Head of Unit or equivalent’ or ‘Advisor or equivalent’ by treatment in the same way as the categorisation made for officials being seconded to the cabinets in accordance with the Commission Communication of 18 December 2013; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the subsequent decision of the appointing authority, notified on 24 June 2014, not to include the applicant on the list of officials proposed for promotion to grades AD 13 in the context of the 2014 annual promotion exercise provided for Article 45 of the Staff Regulations, to the extent that that decision does not consider the applicant as having special responsibilities resulting in his categorisation in a role of ‘Head of Unit or equivalent’ or ‘Advisor or equivalent’ by treatment in the same way as the categorisation made for officials being seconded to the cabinets in accordance with the Commission Communication of 18 December 2013;

| — | Order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Commission to pay the costs.

---
Exhibit 32.1


                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                                (18 U.S.C. 1350)


     In connection with the Report of Competitive Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the three months ended October 31, 2010, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Johnnie D. Johnson, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and
Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that to my knowledge:

     1.   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
          or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


                                   /s/ Johnnie D. Johnson
                                   ----------------------
                                   Johnnie D. Johnson
                                   Chief Executive Officer,
                                   Chief Financial Officer and Chief
                                   Accounting Officer

                                   December 15, 2010























                                    Page 22
# C_2016145EN.01002702.xml

| 25.4.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 145/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.4.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 145/27

---

Judgment of the General Court of 10 March 2016 — LG Developpement v OHIM — Bayerische Motoren Werke (MINICARGO)

(Case T-160/15) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community figurative mark MINICARGO - Earlier Community word mark MINI - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2016/C 145/34)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: LG Developpement (Baud, France) (represented by: A. Sion, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Bayerische Motoren Werke AG (Munich, Germany) (represented by: R. Delorey, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 23 January 2015 (Case R 596/2014-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Bayerische Motoren Werke AG and LG Developpement.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders LG Developpement to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders LG Developpement to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 198, 15.6.2015.

1

---
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection
with the Amendment to the Quarterly Report of China BAK Battery, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended December 31, 2005 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report). I, Li Xiangqian, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | The Report fully complies with the requirements of   Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |                                                                                                                                                        
| | The information contained in the Report fairly   presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of   operations of the Company.

|By: | /s/ Li Xiangqian        | 
|--- | ----------------------- | 
|    |                         | 
|    | Li Xiangqian            | 
|    | Chief Executive Officer | 
|    | March 27, 2006          | 

---
1

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 40771

STATE OF IDAHO,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

RONALD EUGENE NEW,

Defendant-Appellant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

2013 Unpublished Opinion No. 698

Filed: October 3, 2013

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED 

OPINION AND SHALL NOT 

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the First Judicial District, State of Idaho, 

Kootenai County. Hon. Lansing L. Haynes, District Judge. 

Judgment of conviction and concurrent unified sentences of seven years with 

three years determinate for possession of methamphetamine, and five years with 

three years determinate for felony eluding a peace officer, affirmed.

Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Diane M. Walker, Deputy 

Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. 

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney 

General, Boise, for respondent. 

________________________________________________

Before GUTIERREZ, Chief Judge; LANSING, Judge;

and MELANSON, Judge

PER CURIAM

Ronald Eugene New was convicted of possession of methamphetamine, Idaho Code 

§ 37-2732(c)(1), and felony eluding a peace officer, I.C. § 49-1404. The district court sentenced 

New to concurrent unified terms of seven years with three years determinate for possession and 

five years with three years determinate for eluding. New appeals, contending that his sentences 

are excessive.

Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the 

factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and 

need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 121 Idaho 114, 117-18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014-
2

15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 106 Idaho 447, 449-51, 680 P.2d 869, 871-73 (Ct. App. 

1984); State v. Toohill, 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing 

the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 144 Idaho 

722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record 

in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, New’s judgment of conviction and sentences are affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2010, to which
this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act, and
 2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ Douglas ValentiDouglas ValentiChairman and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
Date: February 11, 2011
No. 49453.

#### Protests 996729-G, etc., of Aoki Taiseido Book Co. (San Francisco)

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

It was stipulated that certain of the books in question are the same in all material respects as those passed upon in *Aoki Taiseido Book Co.*v. *United States*(10 Cust. Ct. 217, C. D. 757). The protests were therefore sustained to that extent.
Low Wind Speed Technology Phase II: LIDAR for Turbine Control

QinetiQ, Inc.

Project Description: Laser anemometry 

(LIDAR) offers an accurate, reliable 

method for wind speed measurement 

from remote locations. Although 

LIDAR was first demonstrated in 

the 1970s, widespread deployment 

of the technology was hampered 

by its expense and complexity. 

However, exploitation of recent 

telecommunications technologies 

promises large improvements in 

LIDAR cost, compactness, and 

reliability. These advances make it feasible to consider the deployment of LIDAR on large wind turbines for the advance detection 

of fluctuations in the incoming wind field. Potential advantages of this approach include greater energy capture and extended 

machine lifetime, resulting from mitigation of structural fatigue.

This study encompasses two main objectives. The first is to examine the requirements for a forward-looking LIDAR system, and 

the second is to characterize the performance of LIDAR when integrated with turbine control systems. In response to the first 

objective, different LIDAR options were characterized, including trade-offs like output power, transceiver configuration, signal 

processing, turbine mounting configuration, and scanning options. To address the second objective, the NREL FAST wind turbine aeroelastic model was augmented with a LIDAR simulation module and then run using turbulent inflow. Results indicate 

that fatigue loads can be significantly reduced under turbulent wind conditions by including LIDAR inflow measurements as a 

controller input.

Project Type:	 Conceptual Design Study

Total Project Budget: 	 $112,430

Industry Cost Share: 	 $0

DOE Cost Share: 	 $112,430

Planned Project Duration: March, 2005–November, 2005

Contacts:

NREL/Sandia: QinetiQ:

Scott Schreck, NREL	 Mike Harris, QinetiQ	 	

1617 Cole Blvd.	 Saint Andrews Road

Golden, Colorado 80401	 Malvern, Worcestershire WR14 3PS, United Kingdom

303-384-7102	 +44 01684 895731

scott_schreck@nrel.gov	 mharris@qinetiq.com

Current Status: 	 Project Completed

A Strong Portfolio for a Strong America • Energy efficiency and clean, renewable energy will mean a stronger economy, a cleaner environment, and greater energy 

independence for America. Working with a wide array of state, community, industry, and university partners, the U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Energy Efficiency 

and Renewable Energy invests in a diverse portfolio of energy technologies.

For more information contact EERE Information Center • 1-877-EERE-INF (1-877-337-3463) • www.eere.energy.gov

Produced for the U.S. Department of Energy by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, a DOE national laboratory

Printed with a renewable-source ink on paper containing at least 50% wastepaper, including 10% post consumer waste.

DOE/GO-102006-2305

June 2006

Examples of LIDAR scanning options, showing hub-mounted staring scheme and hub-mounted conical scan.
No. 54912.

#### Leacock & Company, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 149704-K (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial it was stipulated that the issue herein is similar in all material respects to that involved in *United States*v. *Browne Vintners Co., Inc.*(34 C. C. P. A. 112, C. A. D. 351) and that the merchandise, consisting of embroidered flax napkins, was not in fact received by the importer. In accordance with stipulation of' counsel and following the decision cited it was held that duty is not assessable upon said flax napkins missing from the imported cases. The protest was sustained to this extent.