alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 297 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 297

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 15, 2008

        Received and referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Recognizing the 60th anniversary of the beginning of the integration of 
                           the Armed Forces.

Whereas the United States has always had strong Armed Forces made up of 
        courageous men and women serving the ideals of duty, honor, and country;
Whereas the Armed Forces were unfortunately once a place of segregation of the 
        races;
Whereas despite segregation, minority members of the Armed Forces, such as the 
        Tuskegee Airmen, who

              

 trained at historic Moton Field in Macon County, Alabama, demonstrated 
honor and bravery above and beyond the call of duty;

Whereas the bravery and sacrifice of all members of the Armed Forces regardless 
        of race during World War II and prior conflicts is a matter of national 
        honor;
Whereas the integration of the Armed Forces beginning in 1948 was a seminal 
        event in our Nation's history and instilled the democratic ideal of 
        equality in the military; and
Whereas the continued bravery and dedication of every member of the Armed Forces 
        continues to be a source of pride to every American: Now, therefore, be 
        it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of Congress to honorably and respectfully 
recognize the historic significance and to celebrate the 60th 
Anniversary of President Truman's Executive Order 9981 signed on July 
26, 1948 that declared it to be the policy of the President that there 
shall be equality of treatment and opportunity for all persons in the 
armed services without regard to race, color, religion or national 
origin thereby beginning the process of ending segregation in the 
United States Armed Forces.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 14, 2008.

            Attest:

                                            LORRAINE C. MILLER,

                                                                 Clerk.

                               By Robert F. Reeves,

                                                          Deputy Clerk.
```
-86 -84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74

 34

 36

 38

 40

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★

▲ ▲

▲

▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 1000

18 12 06 00

08/07

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 07 Aug 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.92 N 77.01 W Meters AGL
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 41 Received in Senate (RDS)]

  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 41

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 23, 2007

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
        Providing for a conditional adjournment of the House of 
                            Representatives.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),  
That when the House adjourns on the legislative day of Wednesday, 
January 24, 2007, on a motion offered pursuant to this concurrent 
resolution by its Majority Leader or his designee, it stand adjourned 
until 2 p.m. on Monday, January 29, 2007, or until the time of
any reassembly pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution, 
whichever occurs first; and that when the House adjourns on the 
legislative day of Wednesday, January 31, 2007, on a motion offered 
pursuant to this concurrent resolution by its Majority Leader or his 
designee, it stand adjourned until 2 p.m. on Monday, February 5, 2007, 
or until the time of any reassembly pursuant to section 2 of this 
concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first.
    Sec. 2. The Speaker or her designee, after consultation with the 
Minority Leader, shall notify the Members of the House to reassemble at 
such place and time as she may designate if, in her opinion, the public 
interest shall warrant it.

            Passed the House of Representatives January 23, 2007.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
# C_2019295EN.01003601.xml

| 2.9.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 295/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.9.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 295/36

---

Order of the General Court of 27 June 2019 — Aurubis and Others v Commission

(Case T-738/15) (1)

(State aid - Aid granted by certain provisions of the amended German law on renewable energy sources - Annulment of the act criticised by the Court - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate)

(2019/C 295/46)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicants: Aurubis AG (Hamburg, Germany) and the other 7 applicants whose names are annexed to the order (represented by: C. Arhold and N. Wimmer, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Maxian Rusche and K. Herrmann, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application on the basis of Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of Commission Decision (EU) 2015/1585 of 25 November 2014 on the aid scheme SA.33995 (2013/C) (ex 2013/NN) (implemented by Germany for the support of renewable electricity and of energy-intensive users) (OJ 2015 L 250, p. 122).

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate in the case. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate in the case.

| 2. | The European Commission shall bear its own costs and pay the costs incurred by Aurubis AG and those of the other applicants whose names are listed in the annex. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The European Commission shall bear its own costs and pay the costs incurred by Aurubis AG and those of the other applicants whose names are listed in the annex.

---

(1)  OJ C 59, 15.2.2016

---
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   Exhibit 10.m

                                HUFFY CORPORATION
                              EXECUTIVE PERQUISITES
                              ---------------------


Corporate Officers and Huffy Company Presidents are covered under this program
which consists of:

1.       A monthly automobile allowance: $800/mo., less taxes, for Corporate
         Officers (excluding the Chairman & CEO) and Huffy Company Presidents.
         $1,000/mo., less taxes, for the Chairman & CEO.

2.       Tax and Financial Planning: Up to a maximum of $10,400/year for
         Corporate Officers (excluding the Chairman & CEO) and Huffy Company
         Presidents. Up to a maximum of $15,500/year for the Chairman & CEO.

         -   50% of actual expenses incurred are expensed to Huffy Corporation
             and the other 50% will be imputed to the executive.

         -   To the extent that total expenses are less than $10,400 ($15,500 in
             the case of the Chairman & CEO) the balance may be used to gross-up
             the executive for taxes, but only to the extent necessary.

3.       Huffy Corporation also pays AYCO a $5,000 annual fee under its service
         agreement.

NOTE: Except for the Chairman & CEO, each other covered executive has elected to
obtain services from The AYCO Company, L.P. The Chairman & CEO obtains such
services from Ernst & Young LLP.
EXHIBIT 10.14


                AMENDMENT TO 1998 STOCK OPTION AND INCENTIVE PLAN
                -------------------------------------------------


         WHEREAS, the Company's 1998 Stock Option Plan ( the "Plan") was
         approved by the Board of Directors and shareholders on April 29, 1998;
         and

         WHEREAS, Section 1.04 of the Plan defines the term Change in Control;
         and

         WHEREAS, the Compensation and Benefits Committee has recommended that
         the definition of Change in Control be amended to disregard securities
         acquired directly from the Company and thereby conform such definition
         to the definition of Change in Control contained in other Company
         plans; and

         NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Directors hereby
         amends Section 1.04(a) of the Plan to add the following to the last
         sentence:

                  provided, however, that Company securities acquired directly
                  from the Company shall be disregarded for this purpose;
No. 56684.

protest 113322-K (Los Angeles).

#### R. E. Spriggs Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

For the reasons stated in *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C. D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
**Exhibit      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OF      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | 1.     | The                Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2007 (the                “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the                Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  |
|   | 2.     | Information                contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,                the                financial condition and results of operations of the                Company.                                          |

| /s/                Xiangqian Li              |   |   |
|----------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
| Xiangqian                Li                  |   |   |
| Chief                Executive Officer       |   |   |
| (Principal                Executive Officer) |   |   |
|                                         |   |   |
| /s/                Tony Shen                 |   |   |
| Tony                Shen                     |   |   |
| Chief                Financial Officer       |   |   |
| (Principal                Financial Officer) |   |   |

*A      signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been      provided to China BAK Battery, Inc. and will he retained by China BAK Battery,      Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon      request.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
Financial Data Schedule for Form 10-Q for April 30, 1998
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000102198
<NAME> COMPETITIVE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1998
<CASH>                                         268,046
<SECURITIES>                                 3,249,647
<RECEIVABLES>                                  748,520
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,346,179
<PP&E>                                         358,895
<DEPRECIATION>                                 162,209
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,448,602
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,026,715
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     60,675
<COMMON>                                        60,032
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,301,180
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,448,602
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,847,106
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,825,463
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              35,885
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (889,269)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (889,269)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (889,269)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.15)
        


</TABLE>
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S

O F T E X A S

N O

. W R

- 7 8

, 1 1 4

- 0 1

E X P A R T E R O N A L D J A M E S H A M I L T O N

, J R

.

O N A P P L I C A T I O N F O R W R I T O F H A B E A S C O R P U S

I N C A U S E N O

. 9 0 1 0 4 9

- A I N T H E 1 8 0 D I S T R I C T C O U R T T H

H A R R I S C O U N T Y

P e r c u r i a m

.

O R D E R

T h i s i s a p o s t

- c o n v i c t i o n a p p l i c a t i o n f o r a w r i t o f h a b e a s c o r p u s f i l e d p u r s u a n t t o t h e

p r o v i s i o n s o f T e x a s C o d e o f C r i m i n a l P r o c e d u r e A r t i c l e 1 1

. 0 7 1

.

I n 2 0 0 2

, a j u r y c o n v i c t e d a p p l i c a n t o f t h e o f f e n s e o f c a p i t a l m u r d e r a n d r e t u r n e d

a f f i r m a t i v e a n s w e r s t o t h e p u n i s h m e n t i s s u e s s u b m i t t e d u n d e r A r t i c l e 3 7

. 0 7 1

. T h e t r i a l 1

c o u r t

, a c c o r d i n g l y

, s e t p u n i s h m e n t a t d e a t h

. T h i s C o u r t a f f i r m e d a p p l i c a n t ’ s c o n v i c t i o n a n d

Unless otherw ise specif ied, all re fer ence s to Articles re fer to the Texas Code of 1

Criminal Procedure

.Hamilton - 2

s e n t e n c e o n d i r e c t a p p e a l

. H a m i l t o n v

. S t a t e

, N o

. A P

- 7 4

, 5 2 3 ( T e x

. C r i m

. A p p

. O c t

. 1 3

,

2 0 0 4 ) ( n o t d e s i g n a t e d f o r p u b l i c a t i o n )

.

A p p l i c a n t p r e s e n t s e l e v e n a l l e g a t i o n s i n h i s a p p l i c a t i o n i n w h i c h h e c h a l l e n g e s t h e

v a l i d i t y o f h i s c o n v i c t i o n a n d s e n t e n c e

. T h e t r i a l c o u r t e n t e r e d f i n d i n g s o f f

a c t a n d

c o n c l u s i o n s o f l a w r e c o m m e n d i n g t h a t t h e r e l i e f s o u g h t b e d e n i e d

.

T h i s C o u r t h a s r e v i e w e d t h e r e c o r d w i t h r e s p e c t t o t h e a l l e g a t i o n s m a d e b y A p p l i c a n t

.

W e a g r e e w i t h t h e t r i a l j u d g e ’ s r e c o m m e n d a t i o n a n d a d o p t t h e t r i a l j u d g e ’ s f i n d i n g s a n d

c o n c l u s i o n s

. B a s e d u p o n t h e t r i a l c o u r t ’ s f i n d i n g s a n d c o n c l u s i o n s a n d o u r o w n r e v i e w

, w e

d e n y r e l i e f

.

I T I S S O O R D E R E D T H I S T H E 2 4 D A Y O F J U N E

, 2 0 1 5

. T H

D o N o t P u b l i s h
OFFICEOFTHEATTORNEYGENERALOFTEXAS **AUSTIN**

Honorable W. fns O*Danlel 

### cbvemor or Texar hatla, Texa8 Dear Sir:

**oa808./ /,/y**  **\** letter oi X8y 5, **8 t0**  **the OCll8titUp**  n 1 Of thi8 bill

dlotion heretotoro ty 00~ 

### or ylri0n Oountg Jubge oi 

### Marion 6 aounty Oourt 8hsu hare on aounty of ml1 orlIalnal rdeme8nor Over rhloh the On ~Oullty TeXa8, now ha8 9 jLWi8diotfOn Ot 8aid OOUTt8 all be oonourrent, 

### prodded n of the Di8trlot Court of 8hd.l be and rmain a8 1101 ande~in no rilesaffected by th18



### t ths jurirdiotlon ty Judge of J&Ion U&b Odly t0 tbO8S are enter8d by the detendant in 

### any Oa8ta9of **ml868meanor** 

## riled in 8aib OOUrt. The quoatlon rhloh you 8ubmit in your latter 18 *whether or not thi8 sot 

### YlOlate8 the oon8titutional prori81on8 in T8felmOO to 

### th6 jtUi8dlotion **Of OOuntJr**  **OOUFtIlr***Honotable W. Lee O'Danlel, &y 6, 1939, Page II

**&trwldes** htiC.10 v, 80OtiOU &?i,Of the COII8t~tUtiOli Of ?0Xa8 **a8 fO11OW8:**  -ha b&$8hturo **8hl.l** hato 

## power, by looal or general law, 

## to inoNa8e, didni8h or oh8ugo the OiYll ad **Or~nd jnri8diotion**  **Of COUnty**  **cO~t8;** 

### ind In oa8e8 of any 8uoh oh-0 of juri8diotlon, **the bgi8latUre**  **8h811** 8180 OOIifoW the jUri8diOtiOR **Of the**  **Othar OOUI** **’ t8**  t0 8uOh 0han@.' 1s YJ k pointsa **oat** 

### that uudor 350080

### BillMO. 872, tad ~uri8dlotlon **or** 

### theoouutywntrtla4opon4oat 

### uponthe plo8whloh 

### ruy bo ontored by the dofondait. It 

### thothe oi
dotaratUOd

Onlywhen the dsfenduat **18** oadod **upon to**  

## titer **hi8** plOa. fs tho 

## defMdAUt ont0r8 a plOa Of 

## not mty, 

### theooartrlllbowlthoutJPri8dlotlon and8ll prior 

### prooedding8~- io the 08urt dll b0 

### r8naoroarow.

*o do not tina any 8tatute oontain~ proti8iOIW rimtl8r to &use Biu Ho. 872 nor any **deoirions roforrLPlg**  

## to. W 8lmllar 

### statutoryprOr18lOlA8.

Uu4ar Art1010 5, 

### 88otlonat, of th8 cou8titution ~quotoa *bore, the b@818ttAH 18 

### girem very broad pOwor8.with mforenoe~ to the regulation of the $xrl8&lotfon or 0ounty 0OUl-t8 Md ~0 .do aOt **find** 0Ily~Y181Oll Of th0 aO~t.itUtiOn 

### prohlbklw 

### the **&&SlAtttro** 

### from **lieiting** 

### tho **OOUUty OOUrt** **’ 8**  **jUFi8diOtiOlt in**  

### the **War PrOYidsd**  **in mU80**  **Bm 190.**  **878.** 

## You are l ooordl*~ 

### add804 that It 

### 1s 6mr .o@inlon that EOu80 Bill PO. 878 **doe8** ndt riolate 0ny ooMtitutioM1 proYi81On8 ln mierenoe tq the **jtmi8dfotioa** of the ooanty OOort8.
<PAGE>


                                                                   EXHIBIT 3.1.3

                          CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION OF
                AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                   OF ASK JEEVES, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION

      It is hereby certified, pursuant to 8 Del. Code Section 103(f), THAT:

      1.    The Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Ask Jeeves,
            Inc., a Delaware Corporation (the "Corporation") was filed with this
            office on July 6, 1999 (the "Certificate of Incorporation").

      2.    The Certificate of Incorporation as filed is an inaccurate record of
            the corporate action referred to therein and was erroneously
            executed insasmuch as the last line of the second paragraph of
            Article VII thereof contains a typographical error, referring to
            "Articles V, VI and VI," whereas the proper record of the corporate
            action should have referred to "Articles V, VI and VII."

      3.    The Certificate of Incorporation is hereby corrected by deleting in
            its entirety the reference to "Articles V, VI and VI" at the end of
            the second paragraph of Article VII and substituting in its place,
            "Articles V, VI and VII."

      4.    This certificate of correction to the Certificate of Incorporation
            herein certified was duly adopted, executed and acknowledged
            pursuant to the provisions of Section 103(f) of the General
            Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, by an authorized officer
            of the Corporation as provided for in Section 103(a)(2).

      Executed on April 6, 2001.

                                                 /s/ A. George Battle
                                          ---------------------------------
                                          A. George (Skip) Battle
                                          Chief Executive Officer
No. 45210.

#### Protest 944561-G of Levin Bros. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of paper play balls similar to those the subject of Abstract 40492. The claim at 35 percent under paragraph 1413 was therefore sustained.
No. 46403.

#### Petition 6021-R of Schenker & Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

Entry of this merchandise was made at the invoice value which is claimed to be the foreign-market value and the appraisal was made. on the basis of cost of production which resulted in an advance of over 100 percent. The treasurer of the petitioner-corporation testified that he did not see these greet-' ing cards prior to their appraisement and did not know their printed greetings were *282in the English language. He further testified that his instructions to the customhouse brokers were based on the sworn statement appearing on the consular invoice that: “The Home Market Value of these cards is not higher than above stated." The examiner testified that he had an investigation made in the foreign market and that his appraisal was based on the special agent’s report. The Government stressed the point that since the appraiser’s advance exceeded more than 100 percent, there is presumptive evidence of fraud as covered by section 489, but the court was of the opinion that the advance was due to the different method of appraisement, rather than a straight increase in the per *se*value. The court was satisfied from the record that there was nothing to indicate there were any facts or circumstances known to the petitioner at time of entry of which it did not make a candid disclosure to the appraiser, and there was therefore no reason to question the correctness of the invoice value. *Wolf*v. *United States*(13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 589, T. D. 41453) cited. From an examination of the entire record and considering all the facts in the case, the court was of the opinion that the entry was made without any intention to defraud the revenue or to deceive the appraiser as to the value of the merchandise. The petition was therefore granted.