alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SAT Report

PMN Number: P-13-0208

SAT Date: 1/18/2013

Print Date: 4/1/2013

Related cases:

Concern levels:

Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments

Level of Concern: 2 3

 Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments

2 11

Exposure Based Review:

Health: No

Ecotox: No

Routes of exposure: Health: Dermal Inhalation 

Ecotox: All releases to water

Fate: ;

Keywords:

 Keywords: IRR/CORROSION, LUNG, 

UNCERT-SENS-DERMAL/RESPIRATORY, AQUATOX-A,C

Summary of Assessment:

 Fate:

Fate Summary: P-13-0200-09

FATE: Estimations for MW 441 

Liquid with MP < 25 C (E)

log Kow = 5.01 (E) 

S = Disp. / 1.38 mg/L at 25 C (ICB / E)

VP < 1.0E-6 torr at 25 C (E)

BP > 400 C (E)

H < 1.00E-8 (E)

log Koc = 5.86 (E)
log Fish BCF = 1.85 (E)

log Fish BAF = 1.82 (E) 

POTW removal (%) = 75-90 via sorption and biodeg

Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg = wk-mo

Sorption to soils/sediments = strong

PBT Potential: P2B1

*CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = slow

 Health:

 Health Summary: Absorption is poor through the skin, moderate through 

the GI tract, and good through the lungs based on analogs. There is concern for irritation and 

possible corrosion based on the and concern for lung effects if respirable particles are 

inhaled based on cationic binding to lung tissues and the surfactant properties of the PMN 

material. There is also uncertain concern for dermal and respiratory sensitization based on 

smaller . Moderate concern. 

 Ecotox:

Test Organism Test 

Type

Test End 

Point

Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 3.6

daphnid 48-h LC50 0.54

green algal 96-h EC50 0.27

fish _ chronic value 0.096

daphnid _ chronic 

value

0.057

algal _ chronic 

value

0.11

Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50 _

Sewage Sludge _ Chronic 

Value

_

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for with 

molecular weight adjustment; SAR chemical class = ; MW 494; liquid; 

log Kow = 4.17 (EPI); S = dispersible in water at 25 C (P); pH7; effective concentrations based 

on 100% active ingredients and mean measured concentrations; hardness < 150.0 mg/L as 

CaCO3; and TOC <2.0 mg/L;

Factors Values Comments

Assessment Factor 10

Concentration of Concern 

(ppb)

6

SARs includes molecular weight adjuxtment

SAR Class

Ecotox Category 
Ecotox Factors Comments: 

 SAT Chair: Becky Jones
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 130 (Monday, July 8, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 40727]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-16274]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE FOR PURCHASE FROM PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR SEVERELY DISABLED

Procurement List Addition

AGENCY: Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely 
Disabled.

ACTION: Addition to the Procurement List.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action adds a service to the Procurement List that will 
be provided by nonprofit agency employing persons who are blind or have 
other severe disabilities.

DATES: Effective Date: 8/8/2013.

ADDRESSES: Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely 
Disabled, 1401 S. Clark Street, Suite 10800, Arlington, Virginia, 
22202-4149.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Barry S. Lineback, Telephone: (703) 
603-7740, Fax: (703) 603-0655, or email CMTEFedReg@AbilityOne.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Addition

    On 5/3/2013 (78 FR 25970-25971), the Committee for Purchase From 
People Who Are Blind or Severely Disabled published notice of proposed 
addition to the Procurement List.
    After consideration of the material presented to it concerning 
capability of qualified nonprofit agency to provide the service and 
impact of the addition on the current or most recent contractors, the 
Committee has determined that the service listed below is suitable for 
procurement by the Federal Government under 41 U.S.C. 8501-8506 and 41 
CFR 51-2.4.

Regulatory Flexibility Act Certification

    I certify that the following action will not have a significant 
impact on a substantial number of small entities. The major factors 
considered for this certification were:
    1. The action will not result in any additional reporting, 
recordkeeping or other compliance requirements for small entities other 
than the small organization that will provide the service to the 
Government.
    2. The action will result in authorizing small entity to provide 
the service to the Government.
    3. There are no known regulatory alternatives which would 
accomplish the objectives of the Javits-Wagner-O'Day Act (41 U.S.C. 
8501-8506) in connection with the service proposed for addition to the 
Procurement List.

End of Certification

    Accordingly, the following service is added to the Procurement 
List:

Service

Service Type/Locations: Military Personnel Support Service, Force 
Support Div., Manpower & Military Personnel Branch, Joint 
Expeditionary Base Little Creek-Fort Story, Fort Story, VA. Force 
Support Div., Manpower & Military Personnel Branch, Joint Base 
Langley-Eustis Joint Base Langley-Eustis, VA.
NPA: ServiceSource, Inc., Alexandria, VA.
Contracting Activity: Dept of the Air Force, FA4800 633 CONS LGCP, 
Langley AFB, VA.

Barry S. Lineback,
Director, Business Operations.
[FR Doc. 2013-16274 Filed 7-5-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6353-01-P
```
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

MISAEL MANJARREZ-FELIX,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 12-10484

D.C. No. 4:10-cr-02695-DCB

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

David C. Bury, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 24, 2013** 

Before: RAWLINSON, N.R. SMITH, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.

Misael Manjarrez-Felix appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges the four-month sentence imposed upon revocation of supervised release. 

We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Manjarrez-Felix contends that the district court erred by ordering his

FILED

OCT 02 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 12-10484

revocation sentence to run consecutively to his sentence for illegal reentry. He

argues that U.S.S.G. § 5D1.1(c) creates a presumption that the court impose a

concurrent sentence when a deportable alien is sentenced for violating supervised

release. We disagree. Section 5D1.1(c) concerns the imposition of a term of

supervised release, not the sentence to be imposed upon revocation. See U.S.S.G.

§ 5D1.1(c) (2011). Contrary to Manjarrez-Felix’s argument, the Guidelines

recommend that the court impose a consecutive sentence for a supervised release

violation. See U.S.S.G. § 7B1.3(f). 

Manjarrez-Felix next contends that his sentence is substantively

unreasonable because it creates unwarranted sentencing disparities. Contrary to his

claim, Manjarrez-Felix is not similarly situated to defendants who are not serving

terms of supervised release. The district court did not abuse its discretion in

imposing Manjarrez-Felix’s sentence. See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51

(2007). In light of the totality of the circumstances and the 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)

sentencing factors, the consecutive sentence is substantively reasonable. See id.

AFFIRMED.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

CARLOS ORTIZ,

Defendant BelowAppellant,

v.

STATE OF DELAWARE,

Plaintiff BelowAppellee.

§

§

§ No. 301, 2018

§

§

§ Court Below—Superior Court

§ of the State of Delaware

§ 

§ Cr. ID S0208005710

§ 

§

Submitted: August 13, 2018

 Decided: August 31, 2018

Before STRINE, Chief Justice; VALIHURA and VAUGHN, Justices.

O R D E R

The Court has carefully considered the appellant’s opening brief, the 

State’s motion to affirm,1and the record on appeal. We find it clear that the 

judgment below should be affirmed on the basis of and for the reasons 

assigned by the Superior Court in its well-reasoned decision dated May 18, 

2018. The Superior Court did not err in concluding that the appellant’s ninth 

motion for postconviction relief was procedurally barred and that the 

appellant had failed to overcome the procedural hurdles. Contrary to the 

 

1 The appellant’s request to respond to the motion to affirm is denied.
2

appellant’s argument, he had no retroactive constitutional right to counsel to 

represent him in pursuing his first motion for postconviction relief.

2

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the 

Superior Court is AFFIRMED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Karen L. Valihura

Justice

 

2 Bunting v. State, 2015 WL 2147188 (Del. May 5, 2015).
|   | 1.     | The      Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2008 (the      “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                        |
|   | 2.     | Information      contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the      financial condition and results of operations of the    Company.                                                               |

| /s/      Xiangqian Li              |   |   |
|------------------------------------|--------|--------|
| Xiangqian      Li                  |   |   |
| Chief      Executive Officer       |   |   |
| (Principal      Executive Officer) |   |   |
|                               |   |   |
| /s/      Tony Shen                 |   |   |
| Tony      Shen                     |   |   |
| Chief      Financial Officer       |   |   |
| (Principal      Financial Officer) |   |   |

----
#### F. W. Woolworth Co. *v.*United States

No. 6097.

Invoice dated Sonneberg, Germany, August 14, 1939.

Certified August 16, 1939.

Entered at Baltimore, Md., November 16, 1939.

Entry No. 1644/2.

(Decided February 7, 1945)

*Sharretts & Hillis (Edward P. Sharretts*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Bao,*Assistant Attorney General *(Daniel I. Auster,*special attorney), for the defendant.

OliveR, Presiding Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> It is hereby stipulated by and between counsel for the respective parties hereto, subject to the approval of the court, that the facts and circumstances relating to the item of 10 per centum commission in the case listed in the annexed schedule, identified on the invoice with “xx” in green ink and the initials CHR of Examiner Charles H. Ritz, are in all material respects the same as the facts and circumstances relating to the item of 10 per centum commission specified in the invoices, relating to glass tree ornaments, novelties, and figures covered by reappraisements 113038-A, 113040-A, and 113468-A of the F. W. Woolworth Co. and passed upon by the United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals in *United States*v. *S. S. Kresge Co., B. Shackman & Co., Rice & Co. Corp., Strauss-Echardt Co., Inc., F. W. Woolworth Co.,*26 C. C. P. A. 349, 352, wherein the court held that “A purchasing commission, charged for the handling of merchandise, is not a proper part of dutiable value.”

> It is further stipulated and agreed that on the date of exportation of the merchandise involved in the case listed in the annexed schedule, identified on the invoices with “xx” in green ink and the initials CHR of Examiner Charles H. Ritz, articles such and similar thereto were freely offered for sale and sold to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country of exportation in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade for exportation to the United States at the *per se*unit invoice prices, plus 3)4 per centum social assessments for insurance, vacation, and holiday costs, plus packing, as invoiced, and that there was no higher foreign value.

> As to all other items, the appeal is abandoned.

> *332It is further stipulated and agreed that the record in *United States*v. *S. S. Kresge Co. et al.,*26 C. C. P. A. 349, 352, be incorporated herein and that the said appeal to reappraisement is submitted on this stipulation.

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the .Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise represented on the invoice by the items marked “xx” in green ink and the initials CHE, of Examiner Charles H. Eitz, and that such values are the *per se*unit invoice prices, plus'3K per centum social assessments for insurance, vacation, and holiday costs, plus packing, as invoiced.

The appeal having been abandoned insofar as it relates to all other merchandise, to that extent the appeal is hereby dismissed.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****An admiral's yarn [electronicresource].**
PDF|Mobi|EPUB|
 
SuDoc Number:D 208.210:14

Item Number: 0408-A-02 (online)

CGP systemNumber:001081835 
October 11, 2018
No. 6191.

#### GEORGE A. TREADWELL vs. ICE DELIVERY COMPANY, IN LIQUIDATION.

Syllabus.

Questions of fact only are involved.

Appeal from the Civil District 'Court, Parish of Orleans, Division “A,” No. 99,934. Honorable T. C. *W.*Ellis, Judge.

Joseph Sinai, for plaintiff and appellee.

Merrick, Lewis, Gfensler & Schwarz, for defendant and appellant.

His Honor, EMILE GODCHAUX,

rendered the opinion and decree of the Court, as follows:

Plaintiff’s claim is for services rendered in the liquidation of the defendant company, and the defense is that he was not employed by the company, but by one of its liquidators individually to perform work that it was the duty of and for which that liquidator himself was paid to do, *58and that the latter and not the company is liable for said services.

Opinion and decree, January 5, 1915.

This defense is only partially sustained. It does appear from the evidence that under the plan of liquidation ■adopted each of the three liquidators undertook certain designated work and that one of them instead of performing his allotted work himself employed plaintiff to do it for him. A part of the services for which plaintiff sues was undoubtedly rendered under those circumstances, and for this work it is clear that the company cannot be held liable.

But above and apart from this work, there is no doubt that plaintiff, with the full knowledge of all the liquidators, performed valuable services to the liquidation of a character that it was not contemplated would be performed by any of the liquidators personally, and that if plaintiff had not thus rendered this assistance and devoted his time to the liquidation, others of necessity would have been employed and paid to do so. And we refer particularly to the office work, book-keeping, supervision of collections, preparation of statements, etc. For these services he is unquestionably entitled to remuneration from the company that profited by them and we fix the sum of $300.00 as a fair allowance.

The trial Court awarded $500.00 apparently on the theory that the defendant was liable for all the work done by plaintiff and its judgment will consequently require amendment.

It is accordingly ordered that the judgment be amended by reducing same from $500.00 to $300.00 and that as thus amended it be affirmed, the plaintiff paying the costs of appeal.

Judgment amended.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 355 Received in Senate (RDS)]

  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 355

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 20, 2008

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Providing for a conditional adjournment of the House of Representatives 
         and a conditional recess or adjournment of the Senate.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That when the House adjourns on the legislative day of Thursday, May 
22, 2008, or Friday, May 23, 2008, on a motion offered pursuant to this 
concurrent resolution by its Majority Leader or his designee, it stand 
adjourned until 2 p.m. on Tuesday, June 3, 2008, or until the time of 
any reassembly pursuant to section 2 of this

              

 concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first; and that when the 
Senate recesses or adjourns on any day from Thursday, May 22, 2008, 
through Friday, May 30, 2008, on a motion offered pursuant to this 
concurrent resolution by its Majority Leader or his designee, it stand 
recessed or adjourned until noon on Monday, June 2, 2008, or such other 
time on that day as may be specified in the motion to recess or 
adjourn, or until the time of any reassembly pursuant to section 2 of 
this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first.
    Sec. 2.  The Speaker of the House and the Majority Leader of the 
Senate, or their respective designees, acting jointly after 
consultation with the Minority Leader of the House and the Minority 
Leader of the Senate, shall notify the Members of the House and the 
Senate, respectively, to reassemble at such place and time as they may 
designate if, in their opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 20, 2008.

            Attest:

                                            LORRAINE C. MILLER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

The National Science Board's Committee on Nominating for NSB Elections, pursuant to NSF regulations (45 CFR part 614), the National Science Foundation Act, as amended (42 U.S.C. 1862n-5), and the Government in the Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b), hereby gives notice in regard to the scheduling of meetings for the transaction of National Science Board business and other matters specified, as follows: 

# Date and Time:

Friday, May 4, 2007 at 10:30. 

# Subject Matter:

Discussion of candidates for the National Science Board Executive Committee. 

# Status:

Closed. 

                        This meeting will be held by teleconference originating at the National Science Board Office, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230. Please refer to the National Science Board Web site (                        *http://www.nsf.gov/​nsb*) for information or schedule updates, or contact: Ann Ferrante, National Science Board Office, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230. Telephone: (703) 292-7000.                     

Russell Moy, 

Attorney-Advisor. 

[FR Doc. E7-8418 Filed 5-2-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 34 Received in Senate (RDS)]

  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 34

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 31, 2007

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
  Honoring the life of Percy Lavon Julian, a pioneer in the field of 
   organic chemistry research and development and the first and only 
 African American chemist to be inducted into the National Academy of 
                               Sciences.

Whereas Percy Julian was born on April 11, 1899, in Montgomery, Alabama, the son 
        of a railway clerk and the first member of his family to attend college, 
        graduating from DePauw University in 1920, receiving a M.S. degree from 
        Harvard University in 1923 and a Ph.D. from the University of Vienna in 
        1931;
Whereas in 1935 Dr. Julian became the first to discover a process to synthesize 
        physostigmine, the drug used in the treatment of glaucoma;
Whereas Dr. Julian later pioneered a commercial process to synthesize cortisone 
        from soy beans and yams, enabling the widespread use of cortisone as an 
        affordable treatment of arthritis;
Whereas Dr. Julian was the first African American chemist elected to the 
        National Academy of Sciences in 1973 for his lifetime of scientific 
        accomplishments, held over 130 patents at the time of his death in 1975, 
        and dedicated much of his life to the advancement of African Americans 
        in the sciences; and
Whereas Dr. Julian's life story has been documented in the PBS NOVA film 
        ``Forgotten Genius'': Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),  
That the Congress honors the life of Percy Lavon Julian, a pioneer in 
the field of organic chemistry research and development and the first 
and only African American chemist to be inducted into the National 
Academy of Sciences.

            Passed the House of Representatives January 31, 2007.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```