alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|   | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company      for the periods reflected therein. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      November 11, 2009 | /s/      Harvey B. Grossblatt |
|------------------------------|-------------------------------|
|                         | Harvey      B. Grossblatt     |
|                         | Chief      Executive Officer  |
|                         |                          |
|                         | /s/      James B. Huff        |
|                         | James      B. Huff            |
|                         | Chief      FinancialOfficer   |

----
#### Domingo Uribe SANCHEZ; Alicia Anacleto, Petitioners, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 02-73614.

Agency Nos. [ AXX-XXX-XXX ], [ AXX-XXX-XXX ].

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Sept. 13, 2005.

Decided Sept. 22, 2005.

Arielle N. Bases, Law Office of Arielle Bases, Encino, CA, for Petitioners.

Regional Counsel, Western Region Immigration & Naturalization Service, Laguna Niguel, CA, Ronald E. Lefevre, Chief Legal Officer, Immigration & Naturalization Service, San Francisco, CA, Douglas E. Ginsburg, Brenda M. O’Malley, U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before GRABER and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges, and FOGEL,* District Judge.

*

 The Honorable Jeremy D. Fogel, United States District Judge for the Northern District of California, sitting by designation.

MEMORANDUM**

Petitioners Domingo Uribe Sanchez and Alicia Anacleto, husband and wife, petition for review of the Board of Immigration *900Appeals’ (BIA) dismissal of their application for cancellation of removal.

The BIA held that Petitioners, although credible, failed to establish the requisite ten years of continuous physical presence in the United States because the husband testified inconsistently as to his date of entry and because Petitioners provided insufficient corroboration. However, the wife testified clearly that Petitioners entered in June of 1989 and that they had been present continuously since then. The independent corroborating witness testified consistently with the wife’s testimony.

The uncertainty in the husband’s testimony appears to have resulted from his nervousness, which in turn resulted from hostile questioning by the immigration judge (IJ). We do not disagree with the BIA’s conclusion that the IJ’s behavior did not rise to the level of a due process violation, because the IJ did not limit the evidence that Petitioners presented. But it is clear from the transcript of the hearing that the IJ’s behavior did detract from the husband’s ability to testify calmly and coherently.

In view of the absence of any contrary evidence, and in view of the credible testimony of the wife and the independent witness, we conclude that Petitioners met their burden to prove ten years of continuous presence, despite any defects in the husband’s testimony and despite the absence of corroborating documentation. *See Vera-Villegas v. INS,*330 F.3d 1222, 1234 (9th Cir.2003) (holding that a petitioner’s failure to provide documentary evidence of continuous presence is not, alone, an adequate basis to reject the petitioner’s application for suspension of deportation).

We therefore remand the matter to the BIA to decide in the first instance whether the other criteria for cancellation of removal, 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b), have been met.

PETITION GRANTED; REMANDED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (AS RESTATED) AS AND OF THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED
JANUARY 31, 1998.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1998
<CASH>                                           3,840
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    128,511
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               136,165
<PP&E>                                         160,705
<DEPRECIATION>                                  79,403
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 217,948
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          108,387
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            87
<OTHER-SE>                                      59,884
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   217,948
<SALES>                                        357,765
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               357,765
<CGS>                                          225,094
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  225,094
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,228
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,451
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,347
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,104
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.60
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.58


</TABLE>
##### 



EXHIBIT 3.2.2

CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT OF BYLAWS
OF
ASK JEEVES, INC.

The undersigned, being the duly appointed Secretary of Ask Jeeves, Inc., a
Delaware corporation (the Corporation), hereby certifies that the final
sentence of Section 28(b) of the Bylaws of the Corporation, as ratified by the
Board in an action by written consent dated June 4, 2003, was amended and
restated by a vote of the Board of Directors at a meeting duly held on October
30, 2003 to read in its entirety as follows:



| |  | If the corporation has neither a President nor a Chief Executive
Officer (other than pursuant to this sentence), then the Chairman
of the Board of Directors shall also serve as the Chief Executive
Officer of the corporation and shall have the powers and duties
prescribed in paragraph (c) of this Section 28.
| |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: November 12, 2003

| |  |                              
| |  | -----------------------------
| |  | /s/  Brett M. Robertson      
| |  | Brett M. Robertson           
| |  | Secretary and General Counsel
| |  | Ask Jeeves, Inc.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 14 (Tuesday, January 23, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2899-2900]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-880]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[FEMA-1670-DR]


New York; Amendment No. 2 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

[[Page 2900]]


ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of New York (FEMA-1670-DR), dated December 12, 2006, and 
related determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: January 11, 2007.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Magda Ruiz, Recovery Division, Federal 
Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2705.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of New York is hereby amended to include the following 
area among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by 
the catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his 
declaration of December 12, 2006: Sullivan County for Public 
Assistance.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community 
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund Program; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services Program; 97.034, 
Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management 
Assistance; 97.048, Individuals and Households Housing; 97.049, 
Individuals and Households Disaster Housing Operations; 97.050, 
Individuals and Households Program--Other Needs; 97.036, Public 
Assistance Grants; 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.)

R. David Paulison,
Under Secretary for Federal Emergency Management and Director of FEMA.
[FR Doc. E7-880 Filed 1-22-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-10-P
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 379 Received in Senate (RDS)]

  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 379

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                June 24 (legislative day, June 23), 2008

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Providing for a conditional adjournment of the House of Representatives 
         and a conditional recess or adjournment of the Senate.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That when the House adjourns on the legislative day of Thursday, June 
26, 2008, or Friday, June 27, 2008, on a motion offered pursuant to 
this concurrent resolution by its Majority Leader or his designee, it 
stand adjourned until 2 p.m. on Tuesday, July 8, 2008, or until the 
time of any reassembly pursuant to

              

 section 2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first; and 
that when the Senate recesses or adjourns on any day from Thursday, 
June 26, 2008, through Friday, July 4, 2008, on a motion offered 
pursuant to this concurrent resolution by its Majority Leader or his 
designee, it stand recessed or adjourned until noon on Monday, July 7, 
2008, or such other time on that day as may be specified in the motion 
to recess or adjourn, or until the time of any reassembly pursuant to 
section 2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first.
    Sec. 2.  The Speaker of the House and the Majority Leader of the 
Senate, or their respective designees, acting jointly after 
consultation with the Minority Leader of the House and the Minority 
Leader of the Senate, shall notify the Members of the House and the 
Senate, respectively, to reassemble at such place and time as they may 
designate if, in their opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 24, 2008.

            Attest:

                                            LORRAINE C. MILLER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
---

Exhibit 99.20

Summary of Loan Agreement Entered into by and between BAK International (Tianjin) Limited (the Company) and Tianjin Branch, Shanghai Pudong Development Bank (the Creditor) Dated October 9, 2009

Main articles:

- Contract number: 77032009280036;
- Loan principal: RMB 10 million;
- Loan Term: from October 9, 2009 to October 8, 2010;
- Interest rate: fixed at 5.31%;Interest accrued and settled per quarter, interest settlement day is the 20th day of the last month in each quarter;
Penalty interest rate for delayed repayment is 7.965%;
Penalty interest rate for embezzlement of loan proceeds is
10.62%;
- Interest accrued and settled per quarter, interest settlement day is the 20th day of the last month in each quarter;
- Penalty interest rate for delayed repayment is 7.965%;
- Penalty interest rate for embezzlement of loan proceeds is
10.62%;
- Purpose of the loan is to provide working capital for the Company;
- Advanced repayment of loan needs to be approved by the Creditor;
- If any of the following occurs, the Creditor is entitled to demand prepayment of loan principal and interest before maturity and cancel all loans unprovided:The Company provides untrue declaration or breaks promise;
The Company breaks other
agreements with respect to its obligation;
- The Company provides untrue declaration or breaks promise;
- The Company breaks other
agreements with respect to its obligation;
- Breach of contract penalties: release loan agreement, demand prepayment of loan principal and interest before maturity; compensation for the Creditors expenses incurred due to demanding the loan principal and interest in case of litigation;
any other measures the Creditor believes necessary and possible, etc.

Headlines of the articles omitted

- Loan arrangement
- Interest clearing of the loan
- Fee
- Payment of the loan
- Guarantee
- Declaration and undertaking of the Company
- Disputation settlement
- Validity
- Notice

---
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 October 28, 2013

t1021

Order 

Clerk

October 28, 2013

147389

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 147389

COA: 312218 

Wayne CC: 11-009537-FC

JAMES WHITSETT, 11-009538-FC

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 29, 2013 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                5
<LEGEND>
        Commercial and Industrial Companies Article 5 of Regulation S-X Fiscal
        Year ended March 31, 1998 
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         1,035,149
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  4,249,714
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (65,964)
<INVENTORY>                                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               5,502,368
<PP&E>                                         1,690,200
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (432,126)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 7,732,511
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          4,410,122
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                           10
<COMMON>                                          50,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     2,898,210
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   7,732,511
<SALES>                                                0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              28,098,324
<CGS>                                                  0 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 18,532,695
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               7,742,117
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 103,616
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                23,747
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1,733,485
<INCOME-TAX>                                     659,577
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            1,073,908
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1,073,908
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       0.21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0.21
        

</TABLE>
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed October 6, 2021. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D21-0902 Lower Tribunal No. F17-18789

________________ 

### Todd E. Watson, Appellant, vs. 

### The State of Florida, Appellee. An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.315(a) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Miguel M. de la O, Judge. Todd E. Watson, in proper person. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for appellee. Before HENDON, MILLER and BOKOR, JJ. PER CURIAM. Affirmed.
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D19-0025

_____________________________

JAMES MCKAY,

Petitioner,

v.

MARK S. INCH, Secretary,

Florida Department of

Corrections,

Respondent.

_____________________________

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus—Original Jurisdiction.

February 27, 2019

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED. See Baker v. State, 878 So. 2d 1236 (Fla. 2004).

ROBERTS, WETHERELL, and MAKAR, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

James McKay, pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee for Respondent.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****On his Majesty�s service :observations of the British home fleet from the diary, reports, and letters ofJoseph H. Wellings, assistant U.S. naval attach�, London, 1940-41 [electronicresource].**
PDF|Mobi|EPUB|
 
SuDoc Number:D 208.210:5

Item Number: 0408-A-02 (online)

CGP systemNumber:001083095 
October 23, 2018
Exhibit 32.2











CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)








In connection with the Quarterly Report of Walgreen Co., an Illinois corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended February 28, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Wade D. Miquelon, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge:





(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.














/s/ Wade D. Miquelon


Wade D. Miquelon


Chief Financial Officer


Dated:  April 5, 2011





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Walgreen Co. and will be retained by Walgreen Co. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

May 22, 2013

t0515

Order 

May 22, 2013

146518 & (45)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 146518

COA: 305491 

Jackson CC: 10-006208-FH

MARY-LYN RAE DANIELAK,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 20, 2012 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion to 

remand is DENIED.
Articles of Merger

                                     of

                          Trinity Companies, Inc.


     Trinity Companies, Inc., a Utah corporation ("Trinity-Utah"), as the
surviving corporation of the merger of Trinity Companies, Inc., an Oklahoma
corporation ("Trinity-Oklahoma"), with and into Trinity-Utah, hereby adopts
and files the following Articles of Merger pursuant to the provisions of
Section 16-10a-1105 of the Utah Revised Business Corporation Act (the
"Act"):


     1.   The Plan of Merger entitled "Agreement and Plan of
 Reorganization" (the "Plan") providing for the merger between Trinity-Utah
and Trinity-Oklahoma is attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated
herein by this reference.


     2.   At the time shareholder approval was obtained, Trinity-Utah had
outstanding 1,000 shares of Common Stock ("Trinity-Utah Common Stock").
The approval by a majority of the outstanding shares of Trinity-Utah Common
Stock was necessary to approve the Plan, and unanimous approval of the Plan
was obtained.  Trinity-Oklahoma has outstanding 49,774 shares of common
stock ("Trinity-Oklahoma Common Stock").  The approval by a majority of the
outstanding shares of Trinity-Oklahoma Common Stock was necessary to
approve the Plan, and 25,729 shares approved the Plan.  Accordingly, the
number of votes cast for the Plan by each voting group of each party to the
Plan entitled to vote separately was sufficient for approval by that voting
group.


     3.   The principal office of Trinity-Utah is located at 2526 Durant
Ave, 1st Floor, Berkeley, California 94704.


     4.   The effective date of the merger is the filing date of these
Articles of Merger, which date complies with the requirements of Section
16-10a-1104(5) of the Act.


     DATED:  June 20, 2002.

                              Trinity Companies, Inc., a Utah corporation:

                              ____________________________________________

                              By:
                              Name:_______________________________________

                              Its: _______________________________________


Attachment   Exhibit A:  Agreement and Plan of Reorganization

                                 EXHIBIT A
                    AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF REORGANIZATION