alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 10.6**

**Loan Agreement (4)**

**Summary of Loan Agreement by and between the Company and Agricultural Bank dated March 30, 2006**

| **Main contents:** |
|--------------------|
| •             | **Contract No:** No. (81101200600000562) |
| •             | **Loan Amount (RMB)** 39 million |
| •             | **Contract Term:** March 30th, 2006 ~   July 30th, 2006 |
| •             | **Interest rate:** fixed annual rate of 5.22%; |
| •             | **Payment of Interest:** The interest of the   principal shall be paid monthly, and the interest settlement date is on the twentieth   date of each month. |
| •             | **Purpose of the loan** is to purchase raw   materials for the Company. |
| •             | **Liabilities of Breach of Contract** Breach of   contract penalty; withdrawal of loan, prepayment of principal and interest   before maturity, attachment of assets; imposition of compound interest;   lawyer’s fee and travel cost in case of litigation due to the Company ‘s   breach of contract etc. |

| **Headlines of the articles omitted** |
|---------------------------------------|
| •                                | Outline of   the loan |
| •                                | Condition precedent   to the drawing of the loan |
| •                                | Rights and   obligations of the lender |
| •                                | Rights and   obligations of the borrower |
| •                                | Prepayment   of the loan |
| •                                | Breach of   Contract |
| •                                | Guaranty for   the loan |
| •                                | Dispute settlement |
| •                                | Miscellaneous |
| •                                | Effectiveness |
| •                                | Validity |
| •                                | Attention |
---

Summary of Guaranty Contract of Maximum Amount ( the Contract) Entered into by

and between Xiangqian Li (the Guarantor) and Shenzhen Hi-Tech District Branch,

Industrial Bank CO. Ltd (the Creditor) on
December 26, 2010

Main contents:

- Guaranty Contract number: Xingyinshen Gaoxinqu Shouxinge(baozheng)zi(2010)016;
- Xiangqian Li undertakes to assume joint and several liabilities for Shenzhen BAK 
Battery Co., Ltd (the Obligor)s indebtedness towards Industrial Bank under the Comprehensive Credit Facility Agreement of Maximum Amount (reference no.: Xingyinshen Gaoxinqu Shouxinzi (2010)013) from December 26, 2010 to December
26, 2011, and the maximum amount secured is RMB 62.5 million.
- Guaranty Responsibility: The
guaranty under this Contract shall be guaranty with joint and several
liabilities. The guarantor is obligated to pay off the debt in the event the
obligor is unable to pay off the debt (including the creditor declares the debt
becomes mature in advance to its original expiry date due to default of the
obligor or the guarantor).
- Scope of Guaranty:The
guaranty shall cover all of the loan principal, interest, penalty interest,
breach of contract compensation, damages, undertaking fee and all the expenses
such as litigation cost, lawyers fee, notification cost and public notice cost
etc. which is incurred to the Creditor in realizing its creditors right.
- Guaranty period: The guaranty period is from the effective date of this Contract to two years after the expiry of the term of the Credit Facility Agreement and relevant agreement entered into under the Credit Facility Agreement.

Headlines of the articles omitted:

- Termination and explanation
- Payment on demand
- Declaration and undertaking of the Guarantor
- Obligations of the Guarantor
- Instances of Breach of Contract and its Liability
- Independence of Guarantors obligations
- Continuity of Obligations
- Disputation settlement
- Validity
- Supplement articles

---
Exhibit 32.1

                                  Certification

            Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
              (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63
                        of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.  1350), the
undersigned officer of SonomaWest  Holdings,  Inc., a Delaware  corporation (the
"Company"), does hereby certify that:

The Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 (the
"Form 10-Q") of the Company  fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section
13(a) or 15(d), as applicable,  of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 and that
the  information  contained  in the Form 10-Q fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                  Dated: November 10, 2005

                                  /s/ Walker R. Stapleton
                                  -----------------------------------------
                                  Walker R. Stapleton, President, Chief
                                  Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided  to  SonomaWest  Holdings,  Inc.  and will be  retained  by  SonomaWest
Holdings,  Inc. and furnished to the Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its
staff upon request.
(Reap. Dec. 8421)

Entry Nos. J-532; J-657.

#### United States *v.*Herbert B. Moller

(Decided April 21, 1955)

*Warren E. Burger,*Assistant Attorney General, for the plaintiff.

Defendant not represented by counsel.

Rao, Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation entered into by and between the respective parties hereto:

> IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED, by the undersigned, subject to the approval of the Court, that at the time of the exportation of the wheat bran involved herein such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States at Argentine Pesos 166 per M. Kgs., net weight, net packed, (pesos advisory at “basic” rate), in reappt. No. 242328-A, and at Argentine pesos 182 per M. Kgs., net weight, net packed (pesos advisory at “basic” rate), in reappt. 242329-A.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that there was no higher foreign value as defined in Sec. 402 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, for the merchandise involved herein at the times of exportation thereof.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that this case may be submitted on the foregoing stipulation.

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for *488the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values were as follows:

> Argentine pesos per M. Kgs. Reappraisement No. net weight'

> 242328-A 166

> 242329-A 182

> net, packed (Pesos advisory at “basic” rate)

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
No. 45227.

#### Protests 3692-K, etc., of New York Merchandise Co., Inc. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

It was stipulated that the antimony tableware in question is similar to that the subject of Abstract 42474. The claim at 40 percent under paragraph 339 was therefore sustained.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6423

JULIAN EDWARD ROCHESTER,
Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; T. TRAVIS MEDLOCK, Attorney General of the State of South Carolina,
Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (3:93-cv-02670-WBT)

Submitted: April 21, 2009 Decided: May 5, 2009

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Julian Edward Rochester, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Julian Edward Rochester appeals the district court’s
order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion. Because
Rochester failed to make a substantial showing of the denial of
a constitutional right, we deny a certificate of appealability
and dismiss the appeal. Rochester v. South Carolina Dept. of

Corrections , No. 3:93-cv-02670-WBT (D.S.C. Feb. 23, 2009). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
No. 41988.

#### Protests 643820-G, etc., of Viking Trading Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise in question consists of sprays, soap dishes, soap cases, tooth brush tubes, shaving brush tubes, cream jars, bottles, boxes, cylinders, flasks, razor cases, utility cases, soap glasses, and sprinklers, articles of hollow ware, the same as those the subject of *Viking Trading Co.*v. *United States*(C. D. 132). The claim at 40 percent under paragraph 339 was therefore sustained.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 90 (Thursday, May 10, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 26607]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-9052]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

[XRIN: 0648-XA14]


Western Pacific Fishery Management Council; Public Meeting

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of a public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Western Pacific Fishery Management Council (Council) will 
hold its Precious Corals Plan Team (PCPT) meeting, in Honolulu, HI.

ADDRESSES: The PCPT meeting will be held at the Western Pacific Fishery 
Management Council Office, 1164 Bishop St., Suite 1400, Honolulu, HI 
96813.

DATES:  The meeting of the PCPT will be held on June 4, 2007, from 9 
a.m. to 12 noon.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kitty M. Simonds, Executive Director; 
telephone: (808) 522-8220.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The PCPT will meet on June 4, 2007 to 
discuss the following agenda items:
    1. Introductions
    2. Review of last plan team meeting and recommendations
    3. Proposed Auau Black Coral Limited Entry System
    4. Status of Precious Corals Fishery Management Plan Amendments
    5. Status of State of Hawaii Regulations Package
    6. Proposed Precious Corals Research
    The order in which agenda items are addressed may change. Public 
comment periods will be provided throughout the agenda.
    The Plan Team will meet as late as necessary to complete scheduled 
business.
    Although non-emergency issues not contained in this agenda may come 
before the Plan Team for discussion, those issues may not be the 
subject of formal action during this meeting. Plan Team action will be 
restricted to those issues specifically listed in this document and any 
issue arising after publication of this document that requires 
emergency action under section 305(c) of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery 
Conservation and Management Act, provided the public has been notified 
of the Council's intent to take final action to address the emergency.

Special Accommodations

    This meeting is physically accessible to people with disabilities. 
Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aids 
should be directed to Kitty M. Simonds, (808) 522-8220 (voice) or (808) 
522-8226 (fax), at least 5 days prior to the meeting date.

    Authority:  16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.

    Dated: May 7, 2007.
Tracey L. Thompson,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine 
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. E7-9052 Filed 5-9-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S
<PAGE>

                                                           EXHIBIT 3.10


                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                       TO THE ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION OF
                         CHEROKEE MINERALS AND OIL, INC.

     We the undersigned, Ronald L. Laford, President, and Mark S. Brewer,
Assistant Secretary, of Cherokee Minerals and Oil, Inc., a Nevada corporation
(the "Corporation"), do hereby certify:

                                        I

     Pursuant to Section 78.390 of the Nevada Revised Statutes, the Articles of
Incorporation of the Corporation shall be amended as follows:

     "Article I- The name of the Corporation is "HydroMaid International, Inc."

                                       II

     The foregoing amendment was adopted by Consent of the Board of Directors
pursuant to Section 78.315 of the Nevada Revised Statutes, and by vote of a
majority of the stockholders of the Corporation at a meeting duly called and
held January 20, 1999.

                                       III

     The number of common shares entitled to vote on the amendment was
21,246,244.

                                       IV

     The number of common shares voted in favor of the amendment was 17,801,606
with -0- opposing and -0- abstaining.

<PAGE>

                                       Ronald L LaFord
                                       ----------------------------------
                                       Ronald L. LaFord, President


                                       Mark S. Brewer
                                       -----------------------------------
                                       Mark S. Brewer, Assistant Secretary

STATE OF UTAH                )
                             ) ss
COUNTY OF SALT LAKE          )


     On the 20th day of January, 1999, personally appeared before me, a Notary
Public, Ronald L. LaFord, who acknowledged that he is the President of Cherokee
Minerals & Oil, Inc., and that he is authorized to and did execute the above
instrument.


                                       Lorene B. Childs
                                       -----------------------------------
                                       NOTARY PUBLIC

[Notary Seal]

STATE OF UTAH                )
                             ) ss
COUNTY OF SALT LAKE          )


     On the 20th day of January, 1999, personally appeared before me, a Notary
Public, Mark S. Brewer, who acknowledged that he is the President of Cherokee
Minerals & Oil, Inc., and that he is authorized to and did execute the above
instrument.


                                       Lorene B. Childs
                                       -----------------------------------
                                       NOTARY PUBLIC

[Notary Seal]
No. 44277.

#### Protests 886920-G, etc., of S. S. Kresge Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of *Butler*v. *United States*(4 Cust. Ct. 120, C. D. 303) the Rockingham-ware in question was held dutiable at 25 percent under paragraph 210 as claimed.
EXHIBIT
32.2





TWL
CORPORATION





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of TWL Corporation (the "Company") on Form
10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Patrick R. Quinn,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge:





1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.








Date:           May
15, 2008





/s/
      Patrick
      R. QuinnPatrick
      R. QuinnChief
      Financial Officer








A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
TWL Corporation and will be retained by it and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Intra-Mar Transport Corp. (formerly Gondrand Transport Corp.) *v.*United States

No. 7473.

Invoice dated London, England, April 24, 1946.

Certified April 25, 1946.

Entered at New York, N. Y., July 11, 1946.

Entry No. 703086.

(Decided December 11, 1947)

*Brooks & Brooks*for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Mollison, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
No. 46972.

#### Protests 994815-G, etc., of S. T. Linhart.

C. D. 578. Plaintiff’s application for rehearing granted.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                   EXHIBIT 21.1
 
                            LISTING OF SUBSIDIARIES
 
Unigraphics Solutions AG, a Switzerland corporation
 
Unigraphics Solutions Asia/Pacific Incorporated, a Delaware corporation
 
Unigraphics Solutions (Australia) Pty. Ltd., an Australia corporation
 
Unigraphics Solutions (Austria) Handelsgesellschaft m.b.H., an Austria
corporation
 
Unigraphics Solutions B.V., a Netherlands corporation
 
Unigraphics Solutions Canada Ltd., a Canada corporation
 
Unigraphics Solutions Danmark A/S, a Denmark corporation
 
Unigraphics Solutions de Mexico, S.A. de C.V., a Mexico corporation
 
Unigraphics Solutions do Brasil Ltda., a Brazil corporation
 
Unigraphics Solutions Espana, S.A., a Spain corporation
 
Unigraphics Solutions France S.A.S., a France corporation
 
Unigraphics Solutions GmbH, a Germany corporation
 
Unigraphics Solutions (HK) Limited, a Hong Kong corporation
 
Unigraphics Solutions International Inc., a Delaware corporation
 
Unigraphics Solutions Japan, Ltd., a Japan corporation
 
Unigraphics Solutions Korea Ltd., a Korea corporation
 
Unigraphics Solutions Limited, an England corporation
 
Unigraphics Solutions (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd., a Malaysia corporation
 
Unigraphics Solutions Norge AS, a Norway corporation
 
Unigraphics Solutions N.V., a Belgium corporation
 
Unigraphics Solutions Pte. Limited, a Singapore corporation
 
Unigraphics Solutions S.p.A., an Italy corporation
 
Unigraphics Solutions Sp.z.o.o., a Poland corporation
 
Unigraphics Solutions s.r.o., a Czech Republic corporation
 
Unigraphics Solutions Sverige AB, a Sweden corporation
 
Unigraphics Solutions (Thailand) Co., Ltd., a Thailand corporation
 
   Unigraphics Solutions Inc. does business under various assumed/fictitious
names, as follows: EDS Unigraphics Solutions Inc.--in California; EDS
Unigraphics Solutions--in Vermont.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.3


                      [ON DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP LETTERHEAD]


INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT


Board of Directors
DaimlerChrysler Corporation
Auburn Hills, Michigan

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of DaimlerChrysler
Corporation and consolidated subsidiaries ("the Company") as of December 31,
1999 and 1998, and the related consolidated statements of income and cash flows
for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1999. These
financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on
our audits. We did not audit the financial statements of Chrysler Financial
Company L.L.C. (a consolidated subsidiary) for the year ended December 31, 1999,
which statements reflect total assets and total revenues constituting 39% and
5%, respectively, of the related consolidated totals for that year. Those
statements were audited by other auditors whose report has been furnished to us,
and our opinion, insofar as it relates to the amounts included for Chrysler
Financial Company L.L.C. for the year ended December 31, 1999, is based solely
on the report of such other auditors.

We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits and the report of the other auditors provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, based on our audits and the report of the other auditors, such
consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the
financial position of DaimlerChrysler Corporation and its consolidated
subsidiaries at December 31, 1999 and 1998, and the results of their operations
and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December
31, 1999, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.




Deloitte & Touche LLP

February 2, 2000
NO. SCPW-12-0000473

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI # I

IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION OF CHRIS GRINDING

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

ORDER (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, Duffy, and McKenna, JJ.)

Upon consideration of petitioner Chris Grindling’s petition for an extraordinary writ filed on May 9, 2012, it appears that petitioner fails to demonstrate a clear and indisputable right to relief. Therefore, petitioner is not entitled to extraordinary relief. See Kema v. Gaddis, 91 Hawai # i 200, 204, 982 P.2d 334, 338 (1999) (An extraordinary writ will not issue unless the petitioner demonstrates a clear and indisputable right to relief and a lack of alternative means to redress adequately the alleged wrong or obtain the requested action.). Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the clerk of the appellate court shall process the petition for an extraordinary writ without payment of the filing fee. Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-12-0000473 17-MAY-2012 02:38 PM2 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for an extraordinary writ is denied.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, May 17, 2012. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr. /s/ James E. Duffy, Jr.

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna