alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
In The 

Court of Appeals 

Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo 

 

No. 07-22-00211-CV 

 

ESCOBAR CONSTRUCTION, LLC AND VINCENT MARTINEZ, APPELLANTS 

V. 

ELEVINIO RIOJAS, APPELLEE 

On Appeal from the 425th Judicial District Court 

 Williamson County, Texas 

Trial Court No. 21-0761-C425, Honorable Betsy F. Lambeth, Presiding 

December 29, 2022 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before QUINN, C.J., and DOSS and YARBROUGH, JJ. 

Appellants, Escobar Construction, LLC and Vincent Martinez, appeal from the trial 

court’s Final Judgment.

1 Appellants’ brief was due December 2, 2022, but was not filed. 

By letter of December 9, 2022, we notified Appellants that the appeal was subject to 

dismissal for want of prosecution, without further notice, if a brief was not received by 

1 Originally appealed to the Third Court of Appeals, this appeal was transferred to this Court by the 

Texas Supreme Court pursuant to its docket equalizations efforts. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 73.001. 
2

December 19. To date, Appellants have neither filed a brief nor had any further 

communication with this Court.

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 

38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b).

Per Curiam
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6660

MARION WESLEY CARTER, JR.,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

D. T. MAHON, Warden,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior

District Judge. (CA-96-888)

Submitted: August 13, 1998 Decided: September 3, 1998

Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Marion Wesley Carter, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. William W. Muse,

Assistant Attorney General, Lance Bradford Leggitt, Vaughan

Christopher Jones, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA,

Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court's

opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. Carter v. Mahon, No. CA-96-888 (E.D. Va. Apr. 9, 1998). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
(Reap. Dec. 9487)

#### Chemo Puro Manufacturing Corp. et al. *v.*United States

Entry No. 701881, etc.

(Decided May 28, 1958)

*John Irwin Dugan*for the plaintiffs.

*George Oochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Wilson, Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation entered into between counsel for the respective parties:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the attorneys for the respective parties hereto, as follows:

> 1. The American Selling Price, as that term is defined in Section 402(g) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, of the merchandise involved in the appeals enumerated in Schedule A hereto attached, for the periods herein stated, was as follows:

> Item Year American selling price

> Pas Acid 1954-1958, inclusive $3.40 per lb., less *1%,*net packed.

> “ Sodium 1956 2.20 per lb., less 1%, net packed.

> “ “ 1957 2.10 per lb., less *1%,*net packed.

> “ “ 1958 1.90 per lb., less 1%, net packed.

> 2. Each appeal enumerated in Schedule A is limited to the merchandise above described and is abandoned as to all other merchandise, if any, and is hereby submitted for decision.

On the agreed facts, I find and hold American selling price, as that value is defined in section 402(g) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by section 8 of the Customs Administrative Act of 1938, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the involved items covered by the appeals enumerated in schedule “A,” attached hereto and made part of our decision herein, and that such value for each of the involved items at the time of exportation heretofore indicated was as hereinabove set forth in the stipulation of submission.

The appeals having been abandoned insofar as they relate to all other merchandise, to that extent the appeals are dismissed.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 230 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 230

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 30, 2007

Received and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and 
                                Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
  Supporting the observance of Breast Cancer Awareness Month, and for 
                            other purposes.

Whereas every 3 minutes a woman is diagnosed with breast cancer;
Whereas another 180,510 new cases of breast cancer are expected to be diagnosed 
        in the United States in 2007;
Whereas breast cancer is the leading cause of death among women between the ages 
        of 45 and 54;
Whereas 1 out of every 8 women who live to the age of 85 will develop breast 
        cancer in her lifetime;
Whereas the survival rate of women who have breast cancer is 98.1 percent when 
        detected in the early stages;
Whereas mammograms and monthly breast self-examinations are the key components 
        of early detection; and
Whereas observing a Breast Cancer Awareness Month would provide a special 
        opportunity to offer education on the importance of monthly breast self-
        examinations and annual mammograms: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That Congress--
            (1) supports the observance of Breast Cancer Awareness 
        Month in order to provide a special opportunity to offer 
        education on the importance of monthly breast self-examinations 
        and annual mammograms;
            (2) salutes the more than 2.4 million breast cancer 
        survivors in the United States and the efforts of victims, 
        volunteers, and professionals who combat breast cancer each 
        day;
            (3) recognizes and applauds the national and community 
        organizations for their work in promoting awareness about 
        breast cancer, providing information, and offering treatment to 
        its sufferers; and
            (4) urges organizations and health practitioners to use 
        this opportunity to promote awareness about breast cancer, to 
        support monthly self-examinations, and to encourage annual 
        mammograms.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 29, 2007.

            Attest:

                                            LORRAINE C. MILLER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Corporate Trust Services**

  MAC R1204-010  9062 Old Annapolis Road  Columbia, MD 21045  Tel: 410 884 2000  Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc. 

1585 BROADWAY

NEW YORK, New York 10036-8200

 

Re:          Annual Statement of Compliance for Morgan Stanley Capital I Trust 2016-UBS9Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2016-UBS9

 

Per the Pooling and ServicingAgreement dated as of March 1, 2016 (the "Agreement"), theundersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., asCertificate Administrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies asfollows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2016 (the "ReportingPeriod"):

 

(a)     A review of Wells Fargo's activities during the Reporting Period and of itsperformance under the Agreement has been made under such officer's supervision;and

 

(b)     Tothe best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo hasfulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respectsthroughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

February 27, 2017

 

 

/s/ Brian Smith

BRIAN SMITH

Vice President

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll  go far |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------|
Slip Op 01-70

UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE

BEFORE: CHIEF JUDGE GREGORY W. CARMAN

__________________________________________

BETHLEHEM STEEL CORPORATION, et al., :

:

Plaintiffs, :

:

v. : Court No: 00-03-00116

:

UNITED STATES, :

:

Defendant, :

:

& :

:

POHANG IRON & STEEL CO., :

:

Defendant-Intervenor. :

__________________________________________:

ORDER

Upon consideration of the United States’ motion for Clarification and to Amend the

Judgment, and upon the consent of Bethlehem Steel corporation and U.S. Steel Group, a unit of

USX Corporation, and upon receiving no response from Pohang Iron & Steel Co., it is hereby

ORDERED that the motion is granted, and it is further

ORDERED that the judgment entered by the Court on April 4, 2001 is amended by

striking from page 24 of Slip-Op. 01-38 the word “inherent” from before the word

“characteristics” and by changing the phrase “51% of the financial benefits” on page 24 of SlipOp. 01-38 to “51% of the discounts.”

SO ORDERED

___________________________

Gregory W. Carman,

Chief Judge

Dated: June 7, 2001

New York, New York
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Commercial Mortgage  Servicing**D1050-084, 8th Fl  401 South Tryon Street  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|--------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

Reference is hereby made tothat certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of April 1, 2016, by andamong DEUTSCHE MORTGAGE & ASSET RECEIVING CORPORATION, as Depositor, WELLSFARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, MIDLAND LOAN SERVICES, ADIVISION OF PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Special Servicer, WILMINGTONTRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONALASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator, Paying Agent and Custodian and PARKBRIDGE LENDER SERVICES LLC, as Operating Advisor and Asset RepresentationsReviewer with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series2016-C1 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein nototherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 10.11 ofthis Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of CommercialMortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1.            A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from April1, 2016 through December 31, 2016 (the “Reporting Period”), and ofits performance per the Agreement during such period has been made under mysupervision, and 

 

2.            To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer hasfulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respectsthroughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, theundersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2017.

 

/s/ Daniel Bober

Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President

Wells Fargo Bank

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll  go far |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------|
EXHIBIT 32.2

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF

PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL
OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of SonoSite, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2009, I, Michael J.
Schuh, Chief Financial Officer of SonoSite, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) such Annual Report on Form 10-K of SonoSite, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2009, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information
contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K of SonoSite, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2009, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of SonoSite, Inc.



/s/    MICHAEL J. SCHUHMichael J. SchuhVice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)


March 26, 2010
# C_2017231EN.01002201.xml

| 17.7.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 231/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.7.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 231/22

---

Judgment of the General Court of 31 May 2017 — Alma-The Soul of Italian Wine v EUIPO — Miguel Torres (SOTTO IL SOLE ITALIANO SOTTO il SOLE)

(Case T-637/15) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU figurative mark SOTTO IL SOLE ITALIANO SOTTO il SOLE - Earlier EU word mark VIÑA SOL - Relative ground for refusal - Detriment to distinctive character - No similarity between the signs - Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2017/C 231/26)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Alma-The Soul of Italian Wine LLLP (Coral Gables, Florida, United States) (represented by: F. Terrano, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Miguel Torres, SA (Vilafranca del Penedès, Spain) (represented by: J. Güell Serra, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 3 September 2015 (Case R 356/2015-2), relating to opposition proceedings between Miguel Torres and Alma-The Soul of Italian Wine.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 3 September 2015 (Case R 356/2015-2); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 3 September 2015 (Case R 356/2015-2);

| 2. | Orders EUIPO to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Alma-The Soul of Italian Wine LLLP; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders EUIPO to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Alma-The Soul of Italian Wine LLLP;

| 3. | Orders Miguel Torres, SA to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Miguel Torres, SA to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 27, 25.1.2016.

1

---
Summary of Guaranty Contract
of Maximum Amount (the “Contract”) Entered into by and between Mr. Li Xiangqian
and Longgang Branch, Shenzhen Development Bank (the “Creditor”) on December
3rd, 2008
 
 Main
contents:
 ØGuaranty Contract number: Shenfa Longgang Ebaozi
20081203001-3;
 ØAs guarantor, Mr. Li Xiangqian undertakes to
assume joint and several liabilities for Shenzhen BAK Battery Co., Ltd (the
“Obligor”)’s indebtedness towards Shenzhen Development Bank under the
Comprehensive Credit Facility Agreement of Maximum Amount (reference
no.: Shenfa Longgang Zongzi 20081203001) from December 8th, 2008
to December 8th, 2009,
and the maximum amount secured is RMB150 million.
 ØGuaranty Responsibility: The guaranty
under this Contract shall be guaranty with joint and several liabilities. The
guarantor is obligated to pay off the debt in the event the Obligor is unable to
pay off the debt (including the creditor declares the debt becomes mature in
advance to its original expiry date due to default of the Obligor or the
guarantor).
 ØScope ofGuaranty: The guaranty
shall cover all of the loan principal, interest, penalty interest, breach
of contract compensation, damages, undertaking fee and all the expenses
such as litigation cost, lawyer’s fee, notification cost and public notice
cost etc. which is incurred to the Creditor in realizing its creditor’s
right.
 ØGuaranty period: The
guaranty period is from the effective date of this Contract to two years after
the expiry of the term of the Credit Facility Agreement and relevant agreement
entered into under the Credit Facility Agreement.
 
 Headlines
of the articles omitted:
 ØTermination and explanation
 ØPayment on demand
 ØDeclaration and guaranty
 ØIndependent guaranty
 ØFulfillment of the responsibility and giving
up of the right
 ØAmendment of the Contract
 ØEffectiveness and Disputation
settlement
 ØContract period
 ØSupplement articles
#### Mary R. LEE, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Respondent.

No. 05-3279.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Aug. 18, 2005.

Mary R. Lee, pro se.

ORDER

The petitioner having failed to pay the docketing fee required by Federal Circuit Rule 52(a)(1) and to file the required Statement Concerning Discrimination, it is

ORDERED that the petition for review be, and the same hereby is, DISMISSED, for failure to prosecute in accordance with the rules.
Before the Second Division,

November 26, 1945

No. 50709.

#### Petitions 6415-R, etc., of Continental Representatives, Ltd. (Baltimore and Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

The petitions were .dismissed.
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-15-0000122

22-JUN-2015

10:39 AM
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                              AUG-1-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1996
<CASH>                                          27,671
<SECURITIES>                                     2,884
<RECEIVABLES>                                  153,287
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (3,292)
<INVENTORY>                                     91,907
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               288,571
<PP&E>                                         519,616
<DEPRECIATION>                               (249,278)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 641,143
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           79,954
<BONDS>                                         25,600
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        22,835
<OTHER-SE>                                     464,103
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   641,143
<SALES>                                        433,983
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               433,983
<CGS>                                          272,866
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  375,959
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   892
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 553
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 58,884
<INCOME-TAX>                                    22,535
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             36,349
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    36,349
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.60
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.60
        

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

The Board of Directors 

SonoSite, Inc: 

We consent to the incorporation by referencein the registration statements (Nos. 333-97973, 333-89518, 333-51820, 333-82739, 333-49401, 333-74833, 333-60112, 333-110913, 333-124451, and 333-124452) on Form S-8 and registration statements (Nos. 333-91083, 333-68610 and 333-83278) on FormS-3 of SonoSite, Inc. of our reports dated March 14, 2008, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of SonoSite, Inc. as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated statements of operations, cash flows, andshareholders’ equity and comprehensive income for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2007, and the related financial statement schedule, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as ofDecember 31, 2007, which reports appear in the December 31, 2007 annual report on Form 10-K of SonoSite, Inc. 

Our report datedMarch 14, 2008 on the consolidated financial statements referred to above refers to the Company’s adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment, effective January 1, 2006.

/s/ KPMG LLP 

Seattle, Washington 

March 14, 2008
2008 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

10-3-2008

In Re: Alton D. Brown

Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential

Docket No. 08-2683

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2008

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2008 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"In Re: Alton D. Brown " (2008). 2008 Decisions. Paper 412.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2008/412
Amended HLD-149 NOT PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

___________

No. 08-2683

___________

 IN RE: ALTON D. BROWN,

 Petitioner

____________________________________

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus from the

United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania 

(Related to Civ. No. 08-cv-00743)

____________________________________

Submitted Pursuant to Rule 21, Fed. R. App. P.

August 29, 2008

Before: SCIRICA, Chief Judge, ALDISERT and GARTH, Circuit Judges

(Filed: October 3, 2008)

_________

OPINION OF THE COURT

_________

PER CURIAM.

Alton Brown, an inmate incarcerated at a Pennsylvania correctional facility, filed a

complaint in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania for relief from abuse and harassment by

prison staff. He alleged that the staff members retaliated against him for filing various

grievances and complaints. Brown also filed a motion for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and a motion requesting a temporary restraining order and a preliminary

injunction. His motion for leave to file in forma pauperis was docketed on February 15,
The Court has the benefit of reviewing Brown’s original and amended petitions 1

for writ of mandamus. 

2

2008, and his “amended” motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary

injunction was docketed on March 18, 2008. On April 10, 2008, he filed a request to the

District Court asking it to rule on his motions. Brown then petitioned this Court for a writ

of mandamus ordering that the District Court act on his pending motions.1

The District Court has now entered an order denying with prejudice Brown’s

motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and it ordered the Clerk to administratively

terminate the action without filing Brown’s amended complaint or other documents. 

Because the District Court has now provided Brown the relief he sought in his mandamus

petition to this Court, i.e., a ruling on his petition for leave to proceed in forma pauperis

and other pending motions, we will deny his amended mandamus petition as moot.