27076 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 92 / Monday, May 14, 2007 / Notices 

Manufacturer/exporter Margin (percent) 

China First Pencil Company, Ltd. .............................................................................................................................. 2.66 

(which includes its affiliates China First Pencil Fang Zheng Co., ............................................................................. 2.66 

Shanghai First Writing Instrument Co., Ltd., ............................................................................................................. 2.66 

Shanghai Great Wall Pencil Co., Ltd., and ............................................................................................................... 2.66 

Shanghai Three Star Stationery Industry Corp.)6 ..................................................................................................... 2.66 

Beijing Dixon Stationery Company, Ltd. .................................................................................................................... 2.66 

Shandong Rongxin Import & Export Co., Ltd. ........................................................................................................... 2.66 

6As noted in the Preliminary Results for this review, we have determined China First Pencil Company, Ltd., China First Pencil Fang Zheng 

Co., Shanghai First Writing Instrument Co., Ltd., Shanghai Great Wall Pencil Co., Ltd., and Shanghai Three Star Stationery Industry Corp. constitute a single entity. See also Certain Cased Pencils from the People’s Republic of China; Final Results and Partial Rescission of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review, 70 FR 42301 (July 22, 2005) (no change in amended final determination). 

Assessment Rates 

The Department has determined, and 

U.S. Customs and Border Protection 

(‘‘CBP’’) shall assess, antidumping 

duties on all appropriate entries. For 

CFP–Three Star, we calculated 

customer–specific antidumping duty 

assessment amounts based on the ratio 

of the total amount of antidumping 

duties calculated for the examined sales 

of subject merchandise to the total 

quantity of subject merchandise sold in 

those transactions. We calculated 

assessment amounts in this fashion, as 

opposed to calculating importer–

specific ad valorem rates in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), because the 

entered values and importers of record 

for CFP–Three Star’s reported U.S. sales 

are not on the record. Where the 

customer–specific assessment rate is 

above de minimis, we will instruct CBP 

to assess the customer–specific rate 

uniformly on the entered customs value 

of all POR entries of subject 

merchandise sold to the customer. To 

determine whether the per–unit duty 

assessment rates were de minimis (i.e., 

less than 0.50 percent ad valorem), in 

accordance with the requirement set 

forth in 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2), we 

calculated customer–specific ad 

valorem ratios based on the export 

prices. For Dixon and Shandong 

Rongxin (respondents that are being 

assigned the dumping margin calculated 

for CFP–Three Star), we will instruct 

CBP to assess antidumping duties on 

entries of merchandise from these 

companies equal to the dumping margin 

these companies have received in these 

final results of review, regardless of the 

importer of, or customer who 

purchased, their subject merchandise. 

The Department intends to issue 

assessment instructions to CBP 15 days 

after the date of publication of the final 

results of this review. 

Cash–Deposit Requirements 

The following deposit requirements 

will apply to all shipments of certain 

cased pencils from the PRC entered, or 

withdrawn from warehouse, for 

consumption on or after the publication 

date of this notice of final results of 

administrative review, as provided by 

section 751(a)(1) of the Act: (1) the cash 

deposit rates for the companies listed in 

the ‘‘Final Results of Review’’ section 

above will be the rates for those firms 

established in the final results of this 

administrative review; (2) for any 

previously reviewed or investigated PRC 

or non–PRC exporter, not covered in 

this review, with a separate rate, the 

cash deposit rate will be the company–

specific rate established in the most 

recent segment of this proceeding; (3) 

for all other PRC exporters, the cash 

deposit rate will be the PRC–wide rate, 

which is 114.9 percent; and (4) the cash 

deposit rate for any non–PRC exporter 

of subject merchandise from the PRC 

will be the rate applicable to the PRC 

exporter that supplied that exporter. 

These cash deposit requirements shall 

remain in effect until further notice. 

Reimbursement of Duties 

This notice serves as a final reminder 

to importers of their responsibility 

under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a 

certificate regarding the reimbursement 

of antidumping duties prior to 

liquidation of the relevant entries 

during this review period. Failure to 

comply with this requirement could 

result in the Secretary’s presumption 

that reimbursement of the antidumping 

duties occurred and the subsequent 

assessment of double antidumping 

duties. 

Administrative Protective Orders 

This notice also serves as a reminder 

to parties subject to administrative 

protective orders (‘‘APO’’) of their 

responsibility concerning the return or 

destruction of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305. Timely written 

notification of the return/destruction of 

APO materials or conversion to judicial 

protective order is hereby requested. 

Failure to comply with the regulations 

and terms of an APO is a violation 

which is subject to sanction. 

We are issuing and publishing this 

determination and notice in accordance 

with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of 

the Act. 

Dated: May 3, 2007. 

David M. Spooner, 

Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration. 

APPENDIX 

List of Issues in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum 

Comment 1: Whether the Department 

Used the Appropriate Size of Lumber as 

a Surrogate for Pencil Slats 

Comment 2: Whether the Department 

Should Adjust the Pencil Slat Surrogate 

Value to Account for Wood Loss 

Comment 3: Whether the Department 

Should Use the Price of Kiln–Dried or 

Green Lumber to Value Pencil Slats 

Comment 4: Whether the Department 

Used the Appropriate Surrogate 

Financial Ratios 

Comment 5: Whether the Department 

Properly Accounted for Labor–Related 

Expenses in Calculating Financial 

Ratios 

Comment 6: Whether the Department 

Used an Appropriate Labor Rate 

Comment 7: Whether the Department 

Used an Appropriate Surrogate Value 

for Brokerage and Handling Services 

Comment 8: Whether the Department 

Used an Appropriate Surrogate Value 

for Paper Wrap 

Comment 9: Selection of the 

Appropriate Rate to Assign to a Separate 

Rate/Section A Respondent 

[FR Doc. E7–9217 Filed 5–11–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE: 3510–DS–S 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

Applications for Duty-Free Entry of 

Scientific Instruments 

Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the 

Educational, Scientific and Cultural 

Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub. 

L. 89–651, as amended by Pub. L. 106–

36; 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301), we 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 92 / Monday, May 14, 2007 / Notices 27077 

invite comments on the question of 

whether instruments of equivalent 

scientific value, for the purposes for 

which the instruments shown below are 

intended to be used, are being 

manufactured in the United States. 

Comments must comply with 15 CFR 

301.5(a)(3) and (4) of the regulations and 

be postmarked on or before June 4, 

2007. Address written comments to 

Statutory Import Programs Staff, Room 

2104, U.S. Department of Commerce, 

Washington, DC 20230. Applications 

may be examined between 8:30 a.m. and 

5 p.m. at the U.S. Department of 

Commerce in Room 2104. 

Docket Number: 07–023. Applicant: 

University of Miami, Biology 

Department, 1301 Memorial Drive, 

Room 215, Coral Gables, FL 33146. 

Instrument: Electron Microscope, Model 

JEM–1400. Manufacturer: JEOL, USA, 

Inc., Japan. Intended Use: The 

instrument is intended to be used to 

study the ultrastructure of defensive 

glandular structures in the sea hare. 

Aplysia californica is to be studied. 

Structures to be examined include the 

ink gland, opaline gland and white skin 

vesicles. Also, studied will be the 

digestive gland and gill ultrastructure. 

The objectives are to attempt to 

determine if there is a link between food 

sources and the structure of the various 

glands described above. Application 

accepted by Commissioner of Customs: 

April 18, 2007. 

Docket Number: 07–024. Applicant: 

Shriners Hospitals for Children, 3101 

S.W. Sam Jackson Park Road, Portland, 

OR 97239. Instrument: Transmission 

Electron Microscope. Manufacturer: FEI, 

Company, The Netherlands. Intended 

Use: The instrument is intended to be 

used to examine sections from normal 

and diseased tissues, particularly in 

connective tissue, in an effort to 

determine the consequence of disease. 

Molecules and tissues will be analyzed 

in two and three dimensions using 

electron tomography for a better 

understanding of their structure and 

relationships to neighboring tissues and 

molecules. The distribution of 

molecules in normal and diseased 

tissues and the dimensional structure 

within cells and tissues will provide a 

better understanding of how they react 

in a tissue environment with other 

matrix molecules. Application accepted 

by Commissioner of Customs: April 27, 

2007. 

Docket Number: 07–027. Applicant: 

University of Missouri-Columbia, 

Veterinary Medicine Building, Room 

W122, 1600 East Rollins, Columbia, MD 

65211. Instrument: Transmission 

Electron Microscope, Model JEM–1400. 

Manufacturer: JEOL, Japan. Intended 

Use: The instrument is intended to be 

used in a central facility by an average 

of 50 different groups per year including 

faculty, staff and students to study the 

ultrastructure of a wide variety of 

biological and material samples 

including animal and plant tissues, 

microorganisms, and geological and 

engineering samples. The majority of 

use will be for biomedical research, 

agricultural questions and engineering 

problems. Materials developed for 

nanomedicine, pathogenic organisms, 

animal models of human disease, gene 

therapy and new devices and processes 

in engineering will be highlighted by 3D 

tomography. Application accepted by 

Commissioner of Customs: April 27, 

2007. 

Docket Number: 07–028. Applicant: 

Vanderbilt University, Center for 

Structural Biology, 465 21st Avenue 

South, MRB III, Suite 5140, Nashville, 

TN 37232. Instrument: Transmission 

Electron Microscope, Model FP 5005/ 

05. Manufacturer: FEI, Brno, Czech 

Republic. Intended Use: The instrument 

is intended to be used to study purified 

biological macromolecular complexes 

such as the spliceosome and the 

anaphase promoting complex, 

composed of protein and RNA 

components. The objective is to 

determine the three dimensional 

structures of large macromolecular 

complexes. Application accepted by 

Commissioner of Customs: April 27, 

2007. 

Faye Robinson, 

Director, Statutory Import Programs Staff. 

[FR Doc. E7–9214 Filed 5–11–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

National Oceanic and Atmospheric 

Administration 

[I.D. 041307A] 

Small Takes of Marine Mammals 

Incidental to Specified Activities; 

Taking Marine Mammals Incidental to 

Construction and Operation of an LNG 

Facility Off Massachusetts 

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries 

Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 

Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), 

Commerce. 

ACTION: Notice of issuance of an 

incidental harassment authorization. 

SUMMARY: In accordance with provisions 

of the Marine Mammal Protection Act 

(MMPA) as amended, notification is 

hereby given that an Incidental 

Harassment Authorization (IHA) to take 

marine mammals, by harassment, 

incidental to construction and operation 

of an offshore liquefied natural gas 

(LNG) facility in the Massachusetts Bay, 

has been issued to Northeast Gateway 

Energy BridgeTM L.L.C. (Northeast 

Gateway) and Algonquin Gas 

Transmission, L.L.C. (Algonquin) for a 

period of 1 year. 

DATES: This authorization is effective 

from May 8, 2007, until May 7, 2008. 

ADDRESSES: A copy of the application, 

IHA, and a list of references used in this 

document may be obtained by writing to 

P. Michael Payne, Chief, Permits, 

Conservation and Education Division, 

Office of Protected Resources, National 

Marine Fisheries Service, 1315 

East-West Highway, Silver Spring, MD 

20910-3225. A copy of the application 

may be obtained by writing to this 

address or by telephoning the contact 

listed here and is also available at: 

http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/permits/ 

incidental.htm#iha. The Maritime 

Administration (MARAD) and U.S. 

Coast Guard (USCG) Final 

Environmental Impact Statement (Final 

EIS) on the Northeast Gateway Energy 

Bridge LNG Deepwater Port license 

application is available for viewing at 

http://dms.dot.gov under the docket 

number 22219. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Kenneth Hollingshead, Office of 

Protected Resources, NMFS, (301) 

713-2289, ext 128. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

Sections 101(a)(5)(A) and (D) of the 

MMPA (16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.) direct 

the Secretary of Commerce to allow, 

upon request, the incidental, but not 

intentional, taking of marine mammals 

by U.S. citizens who engage in a 

specified activity (other than 

commercial fishing) within a specified 

geographical region if certain findings 

are made and either regulations are 

issued or, if the taking is limited to 

harassment, a notice of a proposed 

authorization is provided to the public 

for review. 

An authorization shall be granted if 

NMFS finds that the taking will have a 

negligible impact on the species or 

stock(s), will not have an unmitigable 

adverse impact on the availability of the 

species or stock(s) for certain 

subsistence uses, and that the 

permissible methods of taking and 

requirements pertaining to the 

mitigation, monitoring and reporting of 

such takings are set forth. NMFS has 

defined ‘‘negligible impact’’ in 50 CFR 

216.103 as ’’...an impact resulting from 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES