alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                     Exhibit 10.1

                                    AMENDMENT NO.1
                                1989 STOCK OPTION PLAN


    WHEREAS, Wallace Computer Services, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
"Company"), has heretofore adopted and maintains a stock option plan for the
benefit of certain of its employees designated the "Wallace Computer Services,
Inc. 1989 Stock Option Plan" (the "Plan") 
 
    WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan in certain respects;

    NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to the power of amendment contained in Section 5
of the Plan, Section 3 of the Plan is amended to delete the fourth and fifth
sentences thereof, and to substitute therefor a new sentence to read as follows:

    The Committee shall consist of not fewer than two members of the Board of
    Directors of Wallace, each of whom shall be a "Non-Employee Director"
    within the meaning of Rule 16b-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
    as amended.

    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this instrument to be executed
by its duly authorized officers this 6th day of November, 1996.

                                  WALLACE COMPUTER SERVICES, INC. 


                                  BY:  /s/  Robert J. Cronin
                                     -------------------------
                                        By:  Robert J. Cronin
                                             President


ATTEST:


BY:  /s/ Michael T. Laudizio
   ---------------------------
      By:  Michael T. Laudizio
           Secretary
|   | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company      for the periods reflected therein. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      February 12, 2009 | /s/ Harvey B. Grossblatt     |
|------------------------------|------------------------------|
|                         | Harvey      B. Grossblatt    |
|                         | Chief      Executive Officer |
|                         |                         |
|                         | /s/ James B. Huff            |
|                         | James      B. Huff           |
|                         | Chief      Financial Officer |

----
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1317 Placed on Calendar Senate (PCS)]

                                                        Calendar No. 92
112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1317

   To allow individuals to choose to opt out of the Medicare part A 
                                benefit.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 30, 2011

    Mr. DeMint (for himself, Mr. Coburn, Mr. Vitter, Mr. Paul, Mr. 
 Sessions, Mr. Lee, Mr. Risch, Mr. Chambliss, Mr. Graham, Ms. Ayotte, 
 Mr. Toomey, Mr. Johnson of Wisconsin, and Mrs. Hutchison) introduced 
 the following bill; which was read twice and ordered to be placed on 
                              the calendar

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To allow individuals to choose to opt out of the Medicare part A 
                                benefit.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Retirement Freedom Act''.

SEC. 2. ALLOWING INDIVIDUALS TO CHOOSE TO OPT OUT OF THE MEDICARE PART 
              A BENEFIT.

    Any individual who is otherwise entitled to benefits under part A 
of title XVIII of the Social Security Act may elect (in such form and 
manner as may be specified by the Secretary of Health and Human 
Services) to opt out of such entitlement. Notwithstanding any other 
provision of law, in the case of an individual who makes such an 
election, such individual--
            (1) may (in such form and manner as may be specified by the 
        Secretary) subsequently choose to end such election and opt 
        back into such entitlement (in accordance with a process 
        determined by the Secretary) without being subject to any 
        penalty;
            (2) shall not be required to opt out of benefits under 
        title II of such Act as a condition for making such election; 
        and
            (3) shall not be required to repay any amount paid under 
        such part A for items and services furnished prior to making 
        such election.
                                                        Calendar No. 92

112th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                S. 1317

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

   To allow individuals to choose to opt out of the Medicare part A 
                                benefit.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             June 30, 2011

          Read twice and ordered to be placed on the calendar
```
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 249 

Recognizing Hostelling International USA for 75 years of service to 

intercultural understanding and to youth travel. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 8, 2007 

Mr. DELAHUNT submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Recognizing Hostelling International USA for 75 years of 

service to intercultural understanding and to youth travel. 

Whereas travel promotes awareness and knowledge of peoples, places, and cultures; 

Whereas hostelling is educational travel, local and global, 

using hostels and programs to facilitate interaction 

among travelers, and with local communities; 

Whereas hostels are simple, safe, shared accommodations 

that promote community and cooperation among users 

and introduce young people of limited means to travel; 

Whereas Hostelling International USA (HI–USA) is a nonprofit educational organization established in 1934 as 

American Youth Hostels to promote hostelling in the 

United States; 


ccoleman on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•HCON 249 IH 

Whereas HI–USA since its founding has welcomed in its hostels more than 22,000,000 overnight stays of visitors 

from the United States and more than 150 countries 

worldwide; 

Whereas HI–USA today has a network of 70 hostels in areas 

of cultural, historic, and recreational interest, often in 

partnership with public, private, and other nonprofit organizations, that annually hosts nearly 1,000,000 overnights stays by both domestic and foreign travelers; 

Whereas HI–USA today offers programs through its hostels 

and local chapters that promote the appreciation of local 

culture and environment, while facilitating the discovery 

of both world and self, to more than 65,000 participants 

annually; and 

Whereas HI–USA has made a unique and notable contribution to intercultural understanding in the United States 

and worldwide, especially among the young: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That the Congress— 

3 (1) congratulates Hostelling International USA 

4 for its 75 years of service; and 

5 (2) commends Hostelling International USA for 

6 its contributions to intercultural exchange and its 

7 leadership in the field of youth travel. 

Æ 


ccoleman on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
#### THOMSON & PRATT INSURANCE ASSOCIATES, INC., Appellant, v. Condoleezza RICE, Secretary of State, Appellee.

No. 05-1502.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Aug. 16, 2005.

ORDER

The parties having so agreed, it is

ORDERED that the proceeding is DISMISSED under Fed. R.App. P. 42(b).
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 24, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-60514

Summary Calendar

 

MINERVA DELGADO-CASTANEDA,

Petitioner,

versus

ALBERTO R. GONZALES, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Respondent.

--------------------

Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

BIA No. A78 942 304 

--------------------

Before REAVLEY, JOLLY, and HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Minerva Delgado-Castaneda petitions this court for review of

the Board of Immigration Appeals’s (BIA’s) denial of cancellation

of removal. Delgado-Castaneda argues that the BIA erred when it

determined that her 1993 voluntary departure from this country

following a visit to Mexico interrupted her ten years continuous

physical presence in the United States.

The Respondent has filed a motion for a summary disposition.

This court has jurisdiction to review the BIA’s order. See

Mireles-Valdez v. Ashcroft, 349 F.3d 213, 217 (5th Cir. 2003). 
No. 04-60514

-2-

To be eligible for a discretionary cancellation of removal, an

alien must satisfy four requirements, one of which is 10 years of

continuous physical presence in the United States. See 8 U.S.C.

§ 1229b(b)(1)(A); Mireles-Valdez, 349 F.3d at 214-15. Delgado’s

voluntary departure from the United States at the border in 1993

interrupted her continuous presence. See Mireles-Valdez, 349

F.3d at 217-19.

The Respondent’s motion for summary disposition is GRANTED,

and the petition for review is DENIED.
# C_2019413EN.01004001.xml

| 9.12.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 413/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.12.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 413/40

---

Judgment of the General Court of 24 September 2019 — Netherlands and Others v Commission

(Cases T-760/15 and T-636/16) (1)

(State aid - Aid implemented by the Netherlands - Decision declaring the aid to be incompatible with the internal market and unlawful and ordering its recovery - Tax ruling - Transfer pricing - Calculation of the tax base - Arm’s length principle - Advantage - Reference system - Fiscal and procedural autonomy of the Member States)

(2019/C 413/47)

Language of the case: Dutch and English

Parties

Applicant in Case T-760/15: Kingdom of the Netherlands (represented initially by M. Bulterman, B. Koopman, M. de Ree and M. Noort, subsequently by M. Bulterman)

Applicants in Case T-636/16: Starbucks Corp. (Seattle, Washington, United States), Starbucks Manufacturing Emea BV (Amsterdam, Netherlands) (represented by: S. Verschuur, M. Petite and M. Stroungi, lawyers),

Defendant: European Commission (in Case T-760/15 represented initially by P. J. Loewenthal and B. Stromsky, subsequently by P. J. Loewenthal and F. Tomat, acting as Agents, and in Case T-636/16, by P. J. Loewenthal and F. Tomat, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the applicant in Case T-760/15: Ireland (represented initially by E. Creedon, G. Hodge, K. Duggan and A. Joyce, subsequently by G. Hodge, A. Joyce, K. Duggan, M. Browne and J. Quaney, acting as Agents, and by M. Collins, P. Gallagher, Senior Counsel, B. Doherty and S. Kingston, Barristers)

Re:

Applications based on Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/502 of 21 October 2015 on State aid SA.38374 (2014/C ex 2014/NN) implemented by the Netherlands to Starbucks (OJ 2017 L 83, p. 38).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Joins Cases T-760/15 and T-636/16 for the purposes of the judgment; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Joins Cases T-760/15 and T-636/16 for the purposes of the judgment;

| 2. | Annuls Commission Decision (EU) 2017/502 of 21 October 2015 on State aid SA.38374 (2014/C ex 2014/NN) implemented by the Netherlands to Starbucks; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Annuls Commission Decision (EU) 2017/502 of 21 October 2015 on State aid SA.38374 (2014/C ex 2014/NN) implemented by the Netherlands to Starbucks;

| 3. | Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Kingdom of the Netherlands, Starbucks Corp. and Starbucks Manufacturing Emea BV; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Kingdom of the Netherlands, Starbucks Corp. and Starbucks Manufacturing Emea BV;

| 4. | Orders Ireland to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders Ireland to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 59, 15.2.2016.

---
EXHIBIT 99.1

                                  Certification

            Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

            (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of
                          Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.  1350), the
undersigned officer of SonomaWest Holdings,  Inc., a California corporation (the
"Company"), does hereby certify that:

The Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended  December 31, 2002 (the
"Form 10-Q") of the Company  fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section
13(a) or 15(d), as applicable,  of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 and that
the  information  contained  in the Form 10-Q fairly  presents,  in all material
respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of  operations of the Company.


Dated: February 13, 2003


                                /s/  Roger S. Mertz
                                ------------------------------------------
                                Roger S. Mertz
                                Chairman of the Board
No. 48144.

#### Protest 868898-G of K. F. Griffiths & Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Walker, J.

The president of the importing corporation testified in behalf of the plaintiff, and he identified certain of the items in the case at bar as similar to exhibits in the case of *Chrystal Co.*v. *United States*(T. D. 49571), which case was incorporated herein. The official papers showed that the merchandise described by the witness was valued at less than $15 per ton. On the record presented the claim at Mo of 1 cent per pound under paragraph 206 was accordingly sustained.
No. 62081.

#### Senter Brass Products Corp. *v.*United States,

protest 192425-K (New York).

Opinion by

Laweence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of ball cock assemblies, which are constituent and integral parts of toilet-box assemblies, the same in all material respects as those the subject of *The Durst Mfg. Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(36 Cust. Ct. 220, C. D. 1778), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
March 24, 1971

No. 71-18

#### Thomas T. Swisher, Formerly PFC, U. S. Army v United States Board of Parole.

ORDERED:

That said “Application” be, and the same is hereby, dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Swisher v Secretary of the Army, Miscellaneous Docket No. 70-59, September 29, 1970, 20 USCMA 685.
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > A Guide to Seasonal Adjustment of Labor Force Data

              																																																			Stinson, John F.					 and 	United States. Bureau of Labor Statistics.								*A Guide to Seasonal Adjustment of Labor Force Data : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 2114*.															Washington, D.C: 										U.S. Dept. of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, 												March 1982,												https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/5207,				accessed on September 25, 2024.										    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 88 (Tuesday, May 8, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 26185]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-8745]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request for Review of a 
Revised Information Collection: RI 92-22

AGENCY: Office of Personnel Management.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. 
L. 104-13, May 22, 1995), this notice announces that the Office of 
Personnel Management (OPM) has submitted to the Office of Management 
and Budget (OMB) a request for review of a revised information 
collection. RI 92-22, Annuity Supplement Earnings Report, is used each 
year to obtain the earned income of each Federal Employees Retirement 
System (FERS) annuitant receiving an annuity supplement. The annuity 
supplement is paid to eligible FERS annuitants who are not retired on 
disability and are not yet age 62. The supplement approximates the 
portion of a full career Social Security benefit earned while under 
FERS and ends at age 62. Like Social Security benefits, the annuity 
supplement is subject to an earnings limitation.
    Approximately 700 RI 92-22 forms are completed annually. Each form 
requires approximately 15 minutes to complete. The annual estimated 
burden is 175 hours.
    For copies of this proposal, contact Mary Beth Smith-Toomey on 
(202) 606-8358, FAX (202) 418-3251 or via e-mail to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#8bc6eaf9f2c9eeffe3a5d8e6e2ffe3a6dfe4e4e6eef2cbe4fbe6a5ece4fd"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="ffb29e8d86bd9a8b97d1ac92968b97d2ab9090929a86bf908f92d1989089">[email protected]</span></a>. Please include a mailing address with your request.

DATES: Comments on this proposal should be received within 30 calendar 
days from the date of this publication.

ADDRESSES: Send or deliver comments to--

Pamela S. Israel, Chief, Operations Support Group, Center for 
Retirement and Insurance Services, U.S. Office of Personnel Management, 
1900 E Street, NW., Room 3349, Washington, DC 20415-3540; and
Brenda Aguilar, OPM Desk Officer, Office of Information & Regulatory 
Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, New Executive Office 
Building, NW., Room 10235, Washington, DC 20503.

FOR INFORMATION REGARDING ADMINISTRATIVE COORDINATION--CONTACT: Cyrus 
S. Benson, Team Leader, Publications Team, RIS Support Services/Support 
Group, (202) 606-0623.

U.S. Office of Personnel Management.
Tricia Hollis,
Chief of Staff.
 [FR Doc. E7-8745 Filed 5-7-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325-38-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1232 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1232

  To modify the definition of fiduciary under the Employee Retirement 
  Income Security Act of 1974 to exclude appraisers of employee stock 
                            ownership plans.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                June 20 (legislative day, June 16), 2011

     Ms. Ayotte (for herself, Ms. Snowe, Ms. Collins, Mr. Brown of 
 Massachusetts, and Ms. Landrieu) introduced the following bill; which 
  was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, 
                          Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To modify the definition of fiduciary under the Employee Retirement 
  Income Security Act of 1974 to exclude appraisers of employee stock 
                            ownership plans.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FIDUCIARY EXCLUSION.

    Section 3(21)(A) of the Employee Retirement Income and Security Act 
of 1974 (29 U.S.C. 1002(21)(A)) is amended by inserting ``and except to 
the extent a person is providing an appraisal or fairness opinion with 
respect to qualifying employer securities (as defined in section 
407(d)(5)) included in an employee stock ownership plan (as defined in 
section 407(d)(6)),'' after ``subparagraph (B),''.
                                 <all>
```
```

[110th Congress Public Law 235]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ235.110]

[[Page 122 STAT. 1552]]

Public Law 110-235
110th Congress

                                 An Act

 
 To provide for an additional temporary extension of programs under the 
 Small Business Act and the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, and 
        for other purposes. <<NOTE: May 23, 2008 -  [S. 3029]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. ADDITIONAL TEMPORARY EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATION OF 
                              PROGRAMS UNDER THE SMALL BUSINESS 
                              ACT AND THE SMALL BUSINESS 
                              INVESTMENT ACT OF 1958.

    (a) In General.--Section 1 of the Act entitled ``An Act to extend 
temporarily certain authorities of the Small Business Administration'', 
approved October 10, 2006 (Public Law 109-316; 120 Stat. 1742), as most 
recently amended by section 1 of Public Law 110-136 (121 Stat. 1453), is 
amended by striking ``May 23, 2008'' each place it appears and inserting 
``March 20, 2009''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall take 
effect on May 22, 2008.

    Approved May 23, 2008.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--S. 3029:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 154 (2008):
            May 15, considered and passed Senate.
            May 20, considered and passed House.

                                  <all>
```