alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Before the Third Division,

September 9, 1940

No. 44271.

#### Protest 975238-G of Ovington Bros. Co. (New York).

*307Opinion by

Cline, J.

The appraiser reports that the merchandise consists of a brass round cage with a singing bird, originally classified at 45 percent under paragraph 397, but in view of G. A. 8696, T. D. 39396, they were classified as musical instruments at 40 percent under paragraph 1541 and 3 cents per pound as amended on the invoice. The record in T. D. 39396 was not moved in evidence. It was therefore held there was nothing to overcome the presumption of correctness attaching to the collector’s classification and the protest was overruled. Wan*amaker*v. *United States*(6 Ct. Cust. Appls. 21, T. D. 35271) cited.
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Security Intelligence
Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended September 30, 2006, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Ben Jamil, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I,
Chris R. Decker, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, do hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: November 20, 2006

                                        /s/ Ben Jamil
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Ben Jamil, Chief Executive Officer

                                        /s/ Chris R. Decker
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Chris R. Decker, Chief Financial Officer

This certification shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.


                                       24
Exhibit 10.23

                                                                         Summary
                                                                         -------


Summary of  Comprehensive  Credit  Facility  Agreement of Maximum Amount between
Shenzhen BAK Battery Co.,  Ltd. and Shuibei  Branch,  Shenzhen  Commercial  Bank
dated April 22, 2005.

Main contents
>>   Contract number: Shen Shang Yin Shuibei Shouxin Zi No.A110020500006;
>>   Maximum amount for credit facilities to be provided: RMB 50 million;
>>   Term: from April 22nd, 2005 to April 22nd, 2006;
>>   Interest rate of loan shall be the base rate announced by the People's Bank
     of China less 10%;
>>   Adjustment  of credit can be made by the  Commercial  Bank under the any of
     the  following:
     |X|  The Company suffers severe operational risk or its financial situation
          severely deteriorates;
     |X|  Guarantor's  payment ability is obviously weakened or value of pledged
          collaterals decreases obviously;
     |X|  Occurrence of other  instances  which make the  Commercial  Bank think
          adjustment of credit facility is necessary;
>>   Breach of contract  penalty:  adjustment of credit,  cancellation of unused
     credit,  imposition  of punitive  interest,  demand  prepayment of loan and
     other measures;
>>   Special terms:
     |X|  Comprehensive  Agreement 3 shall  replace the  previous  comprehensive
          agreement  signed in 2005 with the  Commercial  Bank with the contract
          number of Shen Shang Yin Shuibei Shouxin Zi No NO.A110020500001;
     |X|  As RMB16.64  million is already used under the previous  comprehensive
          agreement in the form of banker's  acceptance  bill, such amount shall
          be deemed to have been used  under the credit  lines of  Comprehensive
          Agreement 3.  Consequently,  before  maturity of the RMB16.64  million
          banker's acceptance bill or guarantee bond of such amount is provided,
          credit  line that the  Company is  entitled  to use shall be  RMB33.36
          million;
     |X|  Credit line under  Comprehensive  Agreement 3 can only be used to open
          L/C for import of equipments and open banker's acceptance bill.
     |X|  All credit  provided under  Comprehensive  Agreement 3 shall expire on
          April 22nd, 2006

Terms  that  have  been  omitted:  types of line of  credit;  use of the line of
credit;  repayment  of the loan  under  the  line of  credit;  undertakings  and
representations of the borrower;  miscellaneous;  integrity;  applicable law and
dispute settlement; effectiveness; and validity.
Exhibit 32

                          Certification of CEO and CFO
                          ----------------------------
                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                       -----------------------------------
                       as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906
                       ----------------------------------
                        of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
                        ---------------------------------




In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Urban Improvement Fund
1974, LP (the "Partnership"), for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2007
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), Paul H. Pfleger, as the equivalent of the Chief Executive Officer of
the Partnership, and John M. Orehek as the equivalent of the Chief Financial
Officer of the Partnership, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of his knowledge:

1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Partnership.



                                      /s/Paul H. Pfleger
                                      --------------------------------
                                      Name: Paul H. Pfleger




                                      /s/John M. Orehek
                                      --------------------------------
                                      Name: John M. Orehek


This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Partnership for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1232 

To modify the definition of fiduciary under the Employee Retirement Income 

Security Act of 1974 to exclude appraisers of employee stock ownership 

plans. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 20 (legislative day, JUNE 16), 2011 

Ms. AYOTTE (for herself, Ms. SNOWE, Ms. COLLINS, Mr. BROWN of Massachusetts, and Ms. LANDRIEU) introduced the following bill; which was 

read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, 

and Pensions 

A BILL 

To modify the definition of fiduciary under the Employee 

Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 to exclude appraisers of employee stock ownership plans. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. FIDUCIARY EXCLUSION. 

4 Section 3(21)(A) of the Employee Retirement Income 

5 and Security Act of 1974 (29 U.S.C. 1002(21)(A)) is 

6 amended by inserting ‘‘and except to the extent a person 

7 is providing an appraisal or fairness opinion with respect 

8 to qualifying employer securities (as defined in section 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1232 IS

1 407(d)(5)) included in an employee stock ownership plan 

2 (as defined in section 407(d)(6)),’’ after ‘‘subparagraph 

3 (B),’’. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed . R . A p p . P . 3 4 (a )( 2 ). A cc o rd in g ly, S tap leto n ’s r e que s tf oror a l a r gum e nti s de ni e d. JK / R es ear ch NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON

UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T R OB E R T S T AP L E T ON , P la in tif

f - A p p e lla n t, v. C IT Y O F P H O E N IX , an i ncorpo ra t ed m uni c i pa l i tyi nc l udi ng, butnotl i m i t e d t o, th e M a y o r ; e t a l., D efen d an t s - A p p el l ees. N o. 08- 17774 D . C. N o . 2 : 0 8 - c v - 0 0 6 8 1 - SRB ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt

f orthe D i s tr i c tof

A r i z ona S us a n R . B ol t on, D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d F e brua ry16, 2010 ** B efo re: F E RN A N D E Z , G O U L D , an d M . S M IT H , C i rcu i tJu d g es. R o b e rt S tap le to n ap p e a ls p r o s e f r o m th e d is tr ic t c o u rt’s o r d e rd is m is s in g h is



# FI LED MA R 03 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALSJ K / Res ea r ch 08- 17774 2 a c t i on a l l e gi ng c i vi l r i ght s vi ol a t i ons i n c onne c t i on w i th s t a t e c r i m i na l z oni ng conv i ct i on s. W e have j uri sdi ct i on un der 28 U . S . C . § 1 29 1. W e r evi ew for an ab u s e o f d is c r e tio n . McH

e nr yv . R e nne , 8 4 F .3 d1 1 7 2 , 1 1 7 7 ( 9 th C ir . 1 9 9 6 ) . W e a f f i rm. T he di s tr i c tc ourtdi d notabus e i t s di s c r e t i on bydi s m i s s i ng the a c t i on f or vi ol at i on of R ul e 8 because the com pl ai ntfa i l ed t o al l ege s uffi ci entfa ct s t o sup po rt f e d e r a l ju r is d ic tio n o ra n yf e d e r a l c la im f

o rr e lie f . See F e d. R . C i v. P . 8( a ) ( s t a t i ng tha tac om pl a i ntm us tc ont a i n a“ s horta nd pl a i n s t a t e m e nt ” of the gr ounds f

orthe c o u rt’s ju r is d ic tio n a n dth e c la im s f o rr e lie f ) ; McH en ry , 84 F . 3d a t1178- 79 (c on cl ud i ng thata c ou rtm aydi sm i ss an ac t i on for non com pl i ance w i th R ul e 8 af t er consi deri ng l es s dra st i c a l t ernat i ves) . S t apl et on ’ s r em ai ni ng cont ent i on s are un pers uasi ve. AF F I RME D.
No. 53262.

#### American Beverage Corp. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 22863-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

For the reasons stated in *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C. D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained. The protests were overruled in all other respects.
#### Fred M. Reinemann *v.*United States

No. 6456.

Entry No. 723598, etc.

Invoices dated London, England, September 29, 1941, etc.

Certified October 1, 1941, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., November 12, 1941, etc.

(Decided October 24, 1946)

*John D. Rode*for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Mollison, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule A hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
IV 

House Calendar No. 4 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 34 

[Report No. 110–4] 

Honoring the life of Percy Lavon Julian, a pioneer in the field of organic 

chemistry research and development and the first and only African American chemist to be inducted into the National Academy of Sciences. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 18, 2007 

Ms. EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON of Texas (for herself, Mr. DAVIS of Illinois, 

Mr. RANGEL, Mr. GORDON of Tennessee, Mr. COSTELLO, Mr. ROHRABACHER, Ms. NORTON, Mr. EHLERS, Ms. JACKSON-LEE of Texas, Ms. 

KILPATRICK of Michigan, Mr. HOLT, and Ms. MATSUI) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 

Science and Technology 

JANUARY 29, 2007 

Additional sponsor: Mr. FATTAH

JANUARY 29, 2007 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Honoring the life of Percy Lavon Julian, a pioneer in the 

field of organic chemistry research and development and 

the first and only African American chemist to be inducted into the National Academy of Sciences. 

mstockstill on PROD1PC62 with BILLS

2 

•HCON 34 RH 

Whereas Percy Julian was born on April 11, 1899, in Montgomery, Alabama, the son of a railway clerk and the first 

member of his family to attend college, graduating from 

DePauw University in 1920, receiving a M.S. degree 

from Harvard University in 1923 and a Ph.D. from the 

University of Vienna in 1931; 

Whereas in 1935 Dr. Julian became the first to discover a 

process to synthesize physostigmine, the drug used in the 

treatment of glaucoma; 

Whereas Dr. Julian later pioneered a commercial process to 

synthesize cortisone from soy beans and yams, enabling 

the widespread use of cortisone as an affordable treatment of arthritis; 

Whereas Dr. Julian was the first African American chemist 

elected to the National Academy of Sciences in 1973 for 

his lifetime of scientific accomplishments, held over 130 

patents at the time of his death in 1975, and dedicated 

much of his life to the advancement of African Americans 

in the sciences; and 

Whereas Dr. Julian’s life story has been documented in the 

PBS NOVA film ‘‘Forgotten Genius’’: Now, therefore, be 

it 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That the Congress honors the life of Percy 

3 Lavon Julian, a pioneer in the field of organic chemistry 

4 research and development and the first and only African 

5 American chemist to be inducted into the National Acad6 emy of Sciences. 

mstockstill on PROD1PC62 with BILLS

mstockstill on PROD1PC62 with BILLS

House Calendar No. 4 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 34 

[Report No. 110

–4] 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Honoring the life of Percy Lavon Julian, a pioneer 

Academy of Sciences. ican chemist to be inducted into the National velopment and the first and only African Amerin the field of organic chemistry research and deJANUARY 29, 2007 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 

mstockstill on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
# Table 1-1

# Table 1-2

# Table 1-3

# Table 1-4

# Table 1-5
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:**Fastand Furious : the anatomy of a failed operation : joint staff report
 
Part1-- final report |Part1-Final-Appendix-Pt1 | Part1-Final-Appendix-Pt2 | Part1-Final-Appendix-Pt3 | Part1-Final-Appendix 2-Part 1 | Part1-Final-Appendix 2-Part 2 | Part1-Final-Appendix 2-Part 3 | Part 2 | Part2 -- Exhibits | Part 3 �Fast and Furious: Obstruction of Congress by the Dept. of Justice (June 2017)
 
SuDoc Number:Y 4.G 74/7:F 26/
Item Number:1016-C (online)
CGP systemNumber:001033787
 
January 18, 2019
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 5785] 

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                         *et seq.*; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note,                         *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236 of October 19, 1999, as amended, and Delegation of Authority No. 257 of April 15, 2003 [68 FR 19875], I hereby determine that the objects to be included in the exhibition “Journey to the Copper Age: Archaeology in the Holy Land”, imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to a loan agreement with the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at the San Diego Museum of Man, San Diego, California, from on or about June 10, 2007, until on or about February 4, 2008, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. Public Notice of these Determinations is ordered to be published in the                         **Federal Register.**

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        For further information, including a list of the exhibit objects, contact Julie Simpson, Attorney-Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of                               ( print page 24655)                            State (                        *telephone:*                         (202) 453-8050). The address is U.S. Department of State, SA-44, 301 4th Street, SW., Room 700, Washington, DC 20547-0001.                     

Dated: April 25, 2007. 

C. Miller Crouch, 

Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.

 [FR Doc. E7-8471 Filed 5-2-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1412 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1412

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 462 Washington Street, Woburn, Massachusetts, as the ``Officer John 
                         Maguire Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 25, 2011

 Mr. Kerry (for himself and Mr. Brown of Massachusetts) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
               Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 462 Washington Street, Woburn, Massachusetts, as the ``Officer John 
                         Maguire Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. OFFICER JOHN MAGUIRE POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 462 Washington Street, Woburn, Massachusetts, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Officer John Maguire Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Officer 
John Maguire Post Office''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 31.1
                                  CERTIFICATION
                                  -------------
I, John B. Nano, Chairman, President, Chief Executive Officer, Interim Chief
Financial Officer and Director, certify that:
1.
  I have reviewed this Report on Form 10-Q of Competitive Technologies,
Inc. (the "Company") for the period ending January 31, 2007;

2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of,
and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
Company and have:

(a)     designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)     evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)     disclosed in this report any change in the Company's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the Company's most recent fiscal
quarter (the Company's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
Company's internal control over financial reporting.

5.     I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control
over financial reporting, to the Company's auditors and the audit committee of
the Company's Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

(a)     all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the Company's ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial information; and

(b)     any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the Company's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: March 15, 2007

/s/ John B. Nano
----------------
John B. Nano
Chairman, President Chief Executive Officer,
Interim Chief Financial Officer and Director