alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9

<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000
<CURRENCY>                                U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   12-Mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                  1.000
<CASH>                                          10,275
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           3,961
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                10,875
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     96,029
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          10,482
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            10,178
<LOANS>                                        281,527
<ALLOWANCE>                                      2,950
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 428,614
<DEPOSITS>                                     367,332
<SHORT-TERM>                                    12,868
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              2,671
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            21
<OTHER-SE>                                      45,722
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 428,614
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 21,873
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                5,884
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   563
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                28,320
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              10,703
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              11,213
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           17,107
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       89
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 18,312
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,452
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       6,452
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,671
<EPS-BASIC>                                       2.17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.17
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    6.99
<LOANS-NON>                                        836
<LOANS-PAST>                                       476
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 2,830
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      186
<RECOVERIES>                                       217
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                2,950
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             2,950
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0




</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2


                            Certification Pursuant to
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350
                             as Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of China BAK Battery, Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period  ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities  Exchange  Commission  on the  date  hereof  (the  "Report").  I, Han
Yongbin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.  1350,  as adopted  pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that:

         (1)      The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.




By: /s/ Han Yongbin
    -----------------------
    Han Yongbin
    Chief Financial Officer
    August 16, 2005
January 24, 1945

No. 6096.

#### S. *H. Pomerance Co., Inc.,*for account of *M. J. Lampert & Sons, Inc.*v. *United States.*

Entered at New York, N. Y. (Not published). Motion by plaintiff’'
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 99.2  CERTIFICATION OF CHERYL J. MIHITSCH

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of GLB Bancorp, Inc. ("GLB") on Form 10-KSB
for the period ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Cheryl J. Mihitsch,
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of GLB, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         GLB.

Date: March 18, 2003                       By: /s/ Cheryl J. Mihitsch
                                               ----------------------
                                                   Cheryl J. Mihitsch
                                                   Chief Financial Officer
                                                   and Treasurer

                                       25
No. 55498.

protests 159783-K (B), etc. (New York).

#### American Express Company et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

    CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
          RELATING TO A PERIODIC REPORT CONTAINING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

      I, David W. Trego, Chief Executive Officer, and I, John C. Barney, Chief
Financial Officer, of UGI Utilities, Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation (the
"Company"), hereby certify that to our knowledge:

      (1)   The Company's periodic report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
            March 31, 2005 (the "Form 10-Q") fully complies with the
            requirements of Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
            1934, as amended; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

                                      * * *

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER                      CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

/s/ David W. Trego                           /s/ John C. Barney
-------------------------                    --------------------------------
David W. Trego                               John C. Barney

Date: May 6, 2005                            Date: May 6, 2005
No. 40426.

#### Protest 966464-G of E. Bilhuber, Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

On the record presented the protest was overruled.
In the Court of Criminal 

Appeals of Texas

══════════

No. WR-93,813-01

══════════

EX PARTE MICHAEL KEITH LUERA, JR.,

Applicant

═══════════════════════════════════════

On Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

Cause No. A-13,435-A in the 173rd District Court

From Henderson County

═══════════════════════════════════════

YEARY, J., filed a concurring opinion, in which SLAUGHTER, J., 

joined.

Applicant was convicted in 2009 of indecency with a child – sexual 

contact and sentenced to four years’ imprisonment. The Twelfth Court 

of Appeals affirmed his conviction in 2010. Luera v. State, No. 12-09-

00101-CR (Tex. App.—Tyler Feb. 26, 2010) (mem. op., not designated for 

publication).
LUERA – 2

In April 2022, Applicant filed an application for writ of habeas 

corpus in the county of conviction. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07. In 

his application, he alleges that he is actually innocent and that his plea 

was involuntary. 

Today, the Court remands this application to the trial court to 

further develop the record. I join the Court’s remand order. But I write 

separately to address my thoughts concerning the doctrine of laches and 

its possible application to this case. See Ex parte Smith, 444 S.W.3d 661 

(Tex. Crim. App. 2014) (holding a trial court has the authority to sua 

sponte consider the doctrine of laches); Ex parte Bazille, ___ S.W.3d ___, 

No. WR-89,851-02, 2022 WL 108348 (Tex. Crim. App. Jan. 12, 2022) 

(Yeary, J., concurring).

The doctrine of laches ought to be considered in a case like this 

one. Applicant’s trial occurred in 2009, but this writ application was not 

filed until over thirteen years later.1 The record is also silent regarding 

circumstances that may excuse Applicant’s delay, and at least some 

explanation for the long delay in filing should be provided.

Consistent with this Court’s precedent, the trial court “may sua 

sponte consider and determine whether laches should bar relief.” Smith, 

444 S.W.3d at 667. If the trial court does so, it must give Applicant the 

opportunity to explain the reasons for the delay, and give the State’s 

prosecutors and/or former counsel for Applicant an opportunity to state 

1 “Our revised approach will permit courts to more broadly consider the 

diminished memories of trial participants and the diminished availability of 

the State’s evidence, both of which may often be said to occur beyond five years 

after a conviction becomes final.” Ex parte Perez, 398 S.W.3d 206, 216 (Tex. 

Crim. App. 2013) (citing Ex parte Steptoe, 132 S.W.3d 434, 437–39 (Tex. Crim. 

App. 2004) (Cochran, J., dissenting)). 
LUERA – 3

whether Applicant’s delay has caused any prejudice to their ability to 

defend against Applicant’s claims. Id. at 670. And ultimately, the trial 

court may include findings of fact and conclusions of law concerning the 

doctrine of laches in its response to this Court’s remand order.

With these additional thoughts, I join the Court’s order.

FILED: June 8, 2022

DO NOT PUBLISH
---

Exhibit 99.17

Summary of Loan Agreement Entered into by and between Shenzhen BAK Battery Co., Ltd.

(the Company) and Longgang Branch, Shenzhen Development Bank Co., Ltd

(the Creditor) on February 3, 2010

Main contents:

- Contract number: Shenfa Longgang Daizi 20100127001;
- Main Contract: Comprehensive Credit Facility Agreement;
- Main Contract number: Shenfa Longgang Zongzidi 20091221001;
- Loan principal: RMB 70 million;
- Loan term: from February 3, 2010 to February 3 , 2011;
- Floating interest rate: Interest rate of loan shall be 90% of the benchmark rate announced by the Peoples Bank of China, and be adjusted every 3 months;

> Interest accrued and settled per month, interest settlement day is the 20thday of each month;
>       Penalty interest rate for delayed repayment: current interest rate plus 50% * current interest rate;
>       Penalty interest rate for embezzlement of loan proceeds: current interest rate *1;

- Purpose of the loan is to provide working capital for the Company;
- If any of the following occurs, the Creditor is entitled to demand prepayment of loan principal and interest before maturity and cancel all loans unprovided ;

> The Company terminates operation or is stopped from
> operation;
>       The Company provides untrue documents or hide important    financial information about its operation;
>       The Company intentionally evades bank debts by way of related party transaction or other means;
>       The Company uses loan proceeds for purposes
> other than what is agreed without the consent of the Creditor;
>       Occurrence of other instances which endangers or may endanger the safety of the loan provided by the Creditor;

Headlines of the articles omitted:

- Interest clearing of the loan
- Payment of the loan
- Rights and obligation of the Company
- Rights and obligations of the Creditor
- Disputation settlement and Validity
- Fees
- Breach of contract penalties
- Declaration, guaranty and undertaking of the Company
- Amendment and Termination of Contract
- Others
- Text

---
Before the First Division,

January 15, 1941

No. 45198.

#### Protest 965641-G of Vita Sales (San Francisco).

*507Opinion by

Brown, J.

It was stipulated that the commodity in question is similar to that the subject of *Fleissner*v. *United States*(2 Cust. Ct. 100, C. D. 96). The claim at 20 percent under paragraph 1558 was therefore sustained.
No. 76-151.

#### Glantz *v.*Association of the Bar of the City of New York.

App. Div., Sup. Ct. N. Y., 1st Jud. Dept. Certiorari denied.
No. 46373.

#### Protest 52370-K of Amos J. Peaslee (Ogdensburg).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

From an examination of the papers the court was unable to find anything sufficient to overcome the presumption of correctness attaching to the collector’s action. The protest was therefore overruled.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gregory GLENN, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-10546

Non-Argument Calendar.

D.C. Docket No. 04-00004-CR-HL-6-1.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

Sept. 6, 2005.

Elizabeth R. Francisco, Sinnreich & Francisco, for Defendant-Appellant.

Dean S. Daskal, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Columbus, GA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Before CARNES, HULL and WILSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Elizabeth Francisco, appointed appellate counsel for Gregory Glenn in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Glenn’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
---

Exhibit 99.14

Summary of Guaranty Contract of Maximum Amount ( the
Contract) Entered into by and between BAK International
Limited (the Guarantor)and Longgang
Branch, Shenzhen Development Bank (the Creditor) on December 21, 2009

Main contents:

- Guaranty Contract number: Shenfa Longgang Ebaozi 20091221001-1;
- Bak International Limited undertakes to assume joint and several
  liabilities for Shenzhen BAK Battery Co., Ltd (the Obligor)s indebtedness
  towards Shenzhen Development Bank under the Comprehensive Credit Facility
  Agreement of Maximum Amount (reference no.: Shenfa Longgang Zongzi
  20091221001) from December 31, 2009 to December 14, 2010, and the maximum
  amount secured is RMB200 million.
- Guaranty Responsibility: The guaranty under this Contract shall be
  guaranty with joint and several liabilities. The guarantor is obligated to pay
  off the debt in the event the obligor is unable to pay off the debt (including
  the creditor declares the debt becomes mature in advance to its original
  expiry date due to default of the obligor or the guarantor).
- Scope of Guaranty:The guaranty shall cover all of the loan
  principal, interest, penalty interest, breach of contract compensation,
  damages, undertaking fee and all the expenses such as litigation cost,
  lawyers fee, notification cost and public notice cost etc. which is incurred
  to the Creditor in realizing its creditors right.
- Guaranty period: The guaranty period is from the effective date of
  this Contract to two years after the expiry of the term of the Credit Facility
  Agreement and relevant agreement entered into under the Credit Facility
  Agreement.

Headlines of the articles omitted:

- Payment on demand
- Declaration, guaranty and undertaking of the Guarantor
- Independent guaranty
- Fulfillment of the responsibility and giving up of the right
- Amendment of the Contract
- Effectiveness and Disputation settlement
- Contract period
- Supplement articles

---
<PAGE>

                                                                  Exhibit 10.1.1

                                  AMENDMENT TO

                             INTEK INFORMATION, INC.
                            1997 AMENDED AND RESTATED
                                STOCK OPTION PLAN



Section 6.1 of the Intek Information, Inc. 1997 Amended and Restated Stock
Option Plan is hereby replaced in its entirety with the following:

     6.1. Maximum Number. The maximum aggregate number of shares of Common Stock
          --------------
     that may be made subject to Stock Options shall be 7,455,552 authorized
     shares. To the extent the aggregate Fair Market Value (determined as of the
     time the ISO is granted) of the stock with respect to which ISOs are
     exercisable for the first time by an individual in a particular calendar
     year exceeds $100,000, such excess Stock Options shall be treated as NSOs.
     If any shares of Common Stock subject to Stock Options are not purchased or
     otherwise paid for before such Stock Options expire, such shares may again
     be made subject to Stock Options.



This Amendment was approved by the Board of Directors and by the requisite
percentage of stockholders of Intek Information, Inc. on February 24, 2000. The
effective date of this Amendment is February 24, 2000.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
Financial Data Schedule for Form 10-Q for January 31, 1997
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000102198
<NAME> COMPETITIVE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1997
<CASH>                                         810,059
<SECURITIES>                                 2,913,892
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,367,106
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,212,221
<PP&E>                                         489,444
<DEPRECIATION>                                 264,278
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,879,503
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,007,676
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     60,675
<COMMON>                                        59,423
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,525,546
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,879,503
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,261,125
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,080,278
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              57,256
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (759,096)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    12,800
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (771,896)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (771,896)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.13)
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 23.1Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmWe hereby consent to the use of our report dated February 23, 2007, on the consolidatedbalance sheets of Kansas City Southern de México, S.A. de C.V. (the “Company”) and subsidiaries asof December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes instockholders’ equity and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2006 and the three months endedMarch 31, 2005 (“Predecessor”) and the nine months ended December 31, 2005 (“Successor”), includedin the Company’s Form 10-K annual report for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 pursuant tosection 13 or 15(d) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.The audit report dated February 23, 2007 on the consolidated financial statements referred to abovecontains an explanatory paragraph stating that due to the acquisition of control of the Company byKansas City Southern on April 1, 2005, the accompanying consolidated financial statements afterMarch 31, 2005 (“Successor”) are presented on a different cost basis than for periods before thechange in control and therefore are not comparable to the consolidated financial statements for theyear ended December 31, 2004 (“Predecessor”). The Company’s consolidated financial statementsreferred to above are separated between “Successor” and “Predecessor” to reflect the Company’sresults and financial position before and after the change in control.KPMG Cárdenas Dosal, S.C./s/ Leandro Castillo
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23
 
                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
 
    As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of
our reports dated January 22, 1999, on the consolidated balance sheets of U S
WEST, Inc. (formerly known as USW-C, Inc., the "Company") as of December 31,
1998 and 1997, and the related consolidated statements of income and cash flows
for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1998, and on
Schedule II, included in this Form 10-K, into the Company's previously filed
Registration Statements: the U S WEST, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan on Form
S-8 (333-53569), the U S WEST, Inc. Long-Term Incentive Plan on Form S-8
(333-53567), the U S WEST, Inc. 1998 Stock Plan on Form S-8 (333-53565), the U S
WEST 1998 Broad-Based Stock Option Plan on the Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to
Form S-8 (333-24283-99), the U S WEST, Inc. Savings Plan/ESOP on Form S-8
(333-53563) and the Shareowner Investment Plan on Form S-3 (333-52781).
 
           [LOGO]
 
Denver, Colorado
February 10, 1999