alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# ^OT-OST- ' ^O0( - fOd ^ Devany , Denni s (OST ) From : Sent : To : Cc : Subject : Devany , Denni s (OST ) Monday , Apri l 18 , 201 1 11:2 4 A M 'Eric k Dahl '
. Martin , Michae l (OST ) RE : EA S Bi d



### " 0 •.. J *i ' — ! Erick , Conside rthi s e-mai l th e grantin g o fyou rrequest . Denni s From : Eric k

Dah l [mailtoiairporttgjwatertownsd.us i Sent : Monday , Apri l 18 , 201 1 11:0 7 A M To : Devany , Denni s (OST ) Cc ; Martin , Michae l (OST ) Subject : RE : EA

S Bi d Dea rMr
. DeVany , ' ' '
. . ~ ~ Th e Cityo fWatertow n i s requestin g a tw o wee k extensio n t o th e commen tperio d t o allo wth e EA S proposal s t o b e reviewe d byth e Cit yo fWatertow n CityCounci l an d Airpor tBoard
. Arecommendatio n wil l b e provide d byth e City a s soo n a s thes e governmen tbodie s hav e ha d a chanc e t o comment . Than k you . Eric k Dah l Airpor l Manage r .'ew.k : 605-882-620 9 tobiie : 605-868-917 9 *-: , 605-882-528 5 

### SPV T



# m\.'' \ ^.'? l A;fport@watertownsd.u s ' Eric k Dahl@HolmaH.co m (MSN ) Cit yo fWatertow n 241 6 Boein g Ave
. Watertown , S D 5720 1 US A .MTN : Aifpoi l Manjoe r
From : Denn(s.DeVanv(a)dot.qovrma(l(:o:Denni5.DeVany(a)dot.qov" l Sent : Monday , Apri l 18 , 201 1 9:0 9 A M To : airport O watertownsd
. u s Cc : Michael.F.Martin@dot.qo v Subject : RE : EA

S Bi d Tha twoul d b e fine
. From : Eric k

Dah l rmai)to:airDort(S]watertown5d.U5 l Sent : Monday , Apri l 18 , 201 1 10:0 8 A M To : Devany , Denni s (OST ) Subject : EA

S Bi d Dennis ,Cit ywoul d lik e t o kno wyou rthought s o n a tw o wee k commen textensio n t o allo wth e issu e t o b e brough ti n fron to n th e airpor tan d cit yboard s fo rconversation
. I fyo u woul d b e s o incline d t o approv e I woul d formall yreques ti ti n a mor e professiona l lookin g email
. Than k you . Also , a s a n aside , wha twoul d yo u thin k abou ta n extensio n o fth e curren tcontrac tunti l th e governmen tactuall y approve s a n FAAreauthorizatio n bill ? Yo u kno wa n extensio n til l a tleas tth e en d o fth e worl d i n 2012...
.

•'••> k 605-882-620 9 cinie : 605-868-917 9 i / 605-882-528 5 i M Airport@watertownsd.u s Eric k Dahl@HotmaH.co m (MSN ) Cit yo fWatertow n 241 6 Boein g Ave
. Watertown , S D 5720 1 US A ATTN - AifpoftMrtHcige r
Case No. 6,514.

#### GOLDING v. GOOD.

TCited in Fenwick v. Grimes, Case No. 4,-733. Nowhere reported; opinion not now accessible.]
#### Julie WILLES, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY; et al., Defendants—Appellees.

No. 03-35848.

D.C. No. CV-01-01457-AJB.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued *&*Submitted March 8, 2005.

Decided Aug. 4, 2005.

N. Roberta Stoll, Esq., Steve D. Larson, Esq., Scott A. Shorr, Esq., Stoll Stoll Berne Lokting *&*Schlachter, PC, Portland, OR, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Stuart D. Jones, Esq., Portland, OR, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before REINHARDT, BERZON, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM *

Plaintiff appeals from the district court’s grant of summary judgment to all defendants. First, with regard to State Farm Fire and Casualty Company, the district court granted summary judgment on the ground that in cases involving an initial policy of insurance, an “increased in any charge” cannot occur “unless the insurer makes an initial demand for payment to the insured and subsequently increases the amount of that demand based on information in the insured’s credit report.” In light of *Edo v. GEICO Casualty Co.,*No. 04-35279, we reject this holding and reverse. Second, the district court reasoned that although State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company denied Willes a policy based on his credit information and made the decision that he would be charged at an increased rate, Mutual was not liable because Willes “did not apply for and was not denied insurance coverage by Mutual within the meaning of FCRA.” Again, we reverse, in light of *Edo.*We remand these and all remaining issues to the district court for consideration in light of *Edo.*

REVERSED AND REMANDED

*

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Summary of Guaranty Contract
of Maximum Amount ( the “Contract”) Entered into by and between Xiangqian Li(the
“Guarantor”) and Shenzhen Caitian Branch, Bank of Communications (the
“Creditor”) on April 26, 2009





Main
contents:


Ø   
Guaranty Contract number: 4431702009B100000001;


Ø   
Xiangqian Li undertakes to assume joint and several liabilities for
Shenzhen BAK Battery Co., Ltd (the “Obligor”)’s indebtedness towards Bank of
Communications under the Comprehensive Credit Facility Agreement of Maximum
Amount (reference no.: 4431702009C000000000) from March 25, 2009
to March 25, 2010, and the maximum amount secured is RMB 200
million.


Ø    Guaranty Responsibility: The guaranty
under this Contract shall be guaranty with joint and several liabilities. The
guarantor is obligated to pay off the debt in the event the obligor is unable to
pay off the debt (including the creditor declares the debt becomes mature in
advance to its original expiry date due to default of the obligor or the
guarantor).


Ø    Scope ofGuaranty:The guaranty shall cover
all of the loan principal, interest, penalty interest, breach of contract
compensation, damages, undertaking fee and all the expenses such as litigation
cost, lawyer’s fee, notification cost and public notice cost etc. which is
incurred to the Creditor in realizing its creditor’s right.


Ø    Guaranty period: The
guaranty period is from the effective date of this Contract to two years after
the expiry of the term of the Credit Facility Agreement and relevant agreement
entered into under the Credit Facility Agreement.





Headlines
of the articles omitted:


Ø   
Termination and explanation


Ø   
Payment on demand


Ø   
Declaration and guaranty of the Guarantor


Ø   
Obligations of the Guarantor


Ø   
Agreement of Bank Sequestrate Deposits


Ø   
Disputation settlement


Ø   
Supplement articles
# C_2019295EN.01003501.xml

| 2.9.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 295/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.9.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 295/35

---

Order of the General Court of 27 June 2019 — Hydro Aluminium Rolled Products v Commission

(Case T-737/15) (1)

(State aid - Aid granted by certain provisions of the amended German law on renewable energy sources - Annulment of the act criticised by the Court - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate)

(2019/C 295/45)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicants: Hydro Aluminium Rolled Products GmbH (Grevenbroich, Germany) (represented by: U. Karpenstein and K. Dingemann, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Maxian Rusche and K. Herrmann, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application on the basis of Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of Commission Decision (EU) 2015/1585 of 25 November 2014 on the aid scheme SA.33995 (2013/C) (ex 2013/NN) (implemented by Germany for the support of renewable electricity and of energy-intensive users) (OJ 2015 L 250, p. 122).

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate in the case. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate in the case.

| 2. | The European Commission shall bear its own costs and pay the costs incurred by Hydro Aluminium Rolled Products GmbH. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The European Commission shall bear its own costs and pay the costs incurred by Hydro Aluminium Rolled Products GmbH.

---

(1)  OJ C 59, 15.2.2016.

---
# C_2016007EN.01003501.xml

| 11.1.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 7/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.1.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 7/35

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (3rd Chamber) of 18 November 2015 — FH v Parliament

(Case F-26/15) (1)

1

((Civil service - Officials - Remuneration - Installation allowance - Article 5(2) of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations - Transfer to a new place of employment - Last sentence of Article 5(4) of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations - Non-payment of the installation allowance if an official entitled to the household allowance is transferred to the place where his family resides - Need for the official to be installed with his family in the place of employment - Spouses effectively separated - Consequences - Inapplicability of the last sentence of Article 5(4) of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations))

(2016/C 007/46)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: FH (represented by: M. Casado García-Hirschfeld, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: O. Caisou-Rousseau and N. Chemaï, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of the decision to reject the applicant’s application to be paid the installation allowance, following his relocation from Yemen to Brussels, where his spouse, from whom he is separated, lives, and an application seeking that the defendant be ordered to pay the applicant that installation allowance together with interest.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of 15 April 2014 by which the European Parliament rejected the application for the installation allowance submitted by FH; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of 15 April 2014 by which the European Parliament rejected the application for the installation allowance submitted by FH;

| 2. | Orders the European Parliament to pay FH, in respect of the installation allowance due to him, a sum corresponding to one month of his basic salary; that sum is to be paid together with default interest calculated at the rate set by the European Central Bank for its main refinancing operations and applicable during the period concerned, increased by two points, from 11 February 2014 until the date of actual payment; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the European Parliament to pay FH, in respect of the installation allowance due to him, a sum corresponding to one month of his basic salary; that sum is to be paid together with default interest calculated at the rate set by the European Central Bank for its main refinancing operations and applicable during the period concerned, increased by two points, from 11 February 2014 until the date of actual payment;

| 3. | Declares that the European Parliament is to bear its own costs and orders it to pay the costs incurred by FH. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Declares that the European Parliament is to bear its own costs and orders it to pay the costs incurred by FH.

---

(1)  OJ C 127, 20/4/2015, p. 44.

1

---
No. 46404.

#### Petition 6172-R of Moser Jewel Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

The so-called meter jewels and watch jewels in question were entered at the invoice values and were accepted by the appraiser at the port of entry. However, the collector of customs at the port of New York, based upon a circular issued, out of Switzerland, filed an appeal for reappraisement which resulted in an advance in values of certain of the items of watch jewels. From the testimony of the appraiser at the port of Perth Amboy, together with that of a partner in the importing company under whose supervision entry was made, it was established that the importer applied to the appraiser for information concerning the dutiable value of these watch jewels, but that the appraiser had no information. It also appeared that neither the appraiser at Perth Amboy nor the importing company had any knowledge of the circular upon which the collector of customs at New York based the appeal, but that upon learning of such circular the importer endeavored to get all available information and submitted it to the examiner. From an examination of the entire record the court was satisfied that the entry was made without any intention to defraud the revenue or deceive the appraiser as to the value of the merchandise. The petition was therefore granted. :
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                        <C>                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              3-MOS                  6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1996            MAR-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996            SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         129,434                129,434
<SECURITIES>                                         0                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,291,667              3,291,667
<ALLOWANCES>                                    50,000                 50,000
<INVENTORY>                                  3,888,301              3,888,301
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,745,997              7,745,997
<PP&E>                                       2,718,673              2,718,673
<DEPRECIATION>                                 912,788                912,788
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              12,387,691             12,387,691
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,011,313              5,011,313
<BONDS>                                              0                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                      0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                      0
<COMMON>                                        32,456                 32,456
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,966,980              5,966,980
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                12,387,691             12,387,691
<SALES>                                      5,237,105              9,584,018
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,237,105              9,584,018
<CGS>                                        4,510,611              8,547,608
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,510,611              8,547,608
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               802,778              1,954,054
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             126,647                239,987
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                171,125               (676,479)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                      0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            121,175               (676,479)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   171,125               (676,479)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .05                   (.21)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .05                   (.21)
        

</TABLE>
Before the First Division,

March 25, 1943

No. 48136.

#### Protests 10373-K, etc., of Anco Import Corp. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel articles in imitation of precious or semiprecious stones composed wholly or in chief value of glass, similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 47818, were held dutiable at 25 percent under paragraph 1503, as modified by the Czechoslovakian Trade Agreement (T. D. 49458). Certain other merchandise stipulated to consist of articles in imitation of precious or semiprecious stones composed wholly or in chief value of glass, similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 47821, were held dutiable at 45 percent under paragraph 1503. Protests sustained to this extent. .
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.16


                 REVISED AMENDMENT TO THE ASSIGNMENT AGREEMENT
                            DATED APRIL 19, 1999 AND
                    THE AMENDMENT TO THE ASSIGNMENT AGREEMENT
                               DATED JUNE 11, 1999

BETWEEN:    CYBEROAD GAMING CORPORATION, a St. Kitts corporation, ("CGC"); and

BETWEEN:    CYBEROAD.COM (ISLE OF MAN) LIMITED, an Isle of Man corporation,
("Cyberoad IOM");

WHEREAS this revised amendment acknowledges that:

      a)    the parties hereto agree that the effective date for all agreements,
            being the Assignment Agreement and License, dated April 19, 1999 and
            the Amendment to the Assignment Agreement, dated June 11, 1999, bear
            the effective date of May 1, 1999.

EXECUTION IN COUNTERPART

This instrument may be signed in counterpart, in as many counterparts as is
necessary, and shall be deemed an original, and shall constitute one and the
same instrument, and shall bear the date first written above.

ACKNOWLEDGED AND AGREED TO THIS 18TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 1999 BY:
CYBEROAD GAMING CORPORATION        CYBEROAD.COM (ISLE OF MAN) LIMITED




 /s/ LAWRENCE COFIELD                    /s/  JOHN COFFEY
---------------------------------      --------------------------------
Lawrence Cofield,                      John Coffey,
Director                               Director
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 90 (Thursday, May 10, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 26612]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-8925]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP07-428-000]


Cheyenne Plains Gas Pipeline Company, L.L.C.; Notice of Tariff 
Filing

May 3, 2007.
    Take notice that on April 27, 2007, Cheyenne Plains Gas Pipeline 
Company, L.L.C. (Cheyenne Plains) tendered for filing as part of its 
FERC Gas Tariff, Original Volume No. 1, Fourth Revised Sheet No. 20, to 
become effective June 1, 2007.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed in accordance with the provisions of 
Sec.  154.210 of the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 154.210). Anyone 
filing an intervention or protest must serve a copy of that document on 
the Applicant. Anyone filing an intervention or protest on or before 
the intervention or protest date need not serve motions to intervene or 
protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#387e7d6a7b77565451565d6b4d4848574a4c785e5d4a5b165f574e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3c7a796e7f7352505552596f494c4c534e487c5a594e5f125b534a">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-8925 Filed 5-9-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration 

Part M of the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) Statement of Organization, Functions, and Delegations of Authority for the Department of Health and Human Services at 72, Number 62, page 15708, April 2, 2007 is amended to reflect a title correction. The title for the Center for Substance Abuse Treatment (MT), Division of State and Community Systems Development (MTE) is replaced with the following: Division of State and Community Assistance (MTE). 

*Delegations of Authority.*                     All delegations and redelegations of authority to officers and employees of SAMHSA which were in effect immediately prior to the effective date of this reorganization shall continue to be in effect pending further redelegations, providing they are consistent with the reorganization.                 

These organizational changes are effective April 10, 2007. 

Dated: April 10, 2007. 

Terry L. Cline, 

Administrator.

[FR Doc. E7-7240 Filed 4-16-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4160-01-P
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsection (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Penseco
Financial Services Corporation (the Company) certifies to the best of his knowledge that:

(1) The
Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the Form 10-K) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Act); and

(2) The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company as for the dates and for the periods referred to in the Form 10-K.



|                             
|-----------------------------
|/s/ Craig W. Best            
|Craig W. Best                
|President and CEO            
|(Principal Executive Officer)
|March 14, 2011