alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ADDENDUM TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

         THIS ADDENDUM is made and entered into this 1 day of  September,  1999,
between OBIE MEDIA CORPORATION,  an Oregon Corporation (the "Company") and Wayne
P. Schur (the "Executive").

         WHEREAS, the Company and Executive entered into an Employment Agreement
dated September 1, 1998;

         WHEREAS,  the  Company  and  Executive  desire to amend the  Employment
Agreement; and

         WHEREAS,  Paragraph  12.3  provides  for  modification  by writing duly
executed by the parties.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and conditions contained
herein and other good and  valuable  consideration,  the Company  and  Executive
hereby agree to add the following provisions:

1.       "Section  3.a  Executive  agrees to use his best efforts to promote the
         interests  of the  company  and to devote  sixty  percent  (60%) of his
         working  time,  attention  and  energies  (three  (3) days per week) to
         performance of his duties under this Agreement  effective  September 1,
         1999."

2.       "Section 4.a Subject to Section 7 of this Agreement, the Company agrees
         to pay a salary  of  $116,673  per  year  less any  federal  and  state
         withholding taxes or other employment  taxes,  payable in substantially
         equal  installments at the same intervals as other senior executives of
         the Company are paid.  The salary shall  increase by $16,668 in each of
         the third, fourth and fifth years of employment"

3. "Section 12.11 Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, Executive and
the Company  upon their mutual  agreement  and in good faith may  reinstate  the
original terms of Sections 3 and 4 of the Employment Agreement."


<PAGE>

         IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  the parties have signed this Addendum on the date
first written above.



Attest:                                       OBIE MEDIA COPRORATION



                                              By:               /s/
---------------------------                      ------------------
Secretary                                        Brian Obie, President


                                                                /s/ (SEAL)
                                               ---------------------
                                                Wayne P. Schur
No. 54913.

#### Coro, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 149351-K (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial it was stipulated that the issue herein is similar in all material respects to that involved in *United States*v. *Browne Vintners Co., Inc.*(34 C. C. P. A. 112, C. A. D. 351) and that the merchandise, consisting of 20% dozen pins, item 1307, from case H. R. 642, was not in fact imported. In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the decision cited it was held that duty is not assessable upon the 20% dozen pins, item 1307, missing from case H. R. 642. The protest was sustained to this extent.
III 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 244 

Expressing support for the Pledge of Allegiance. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 15, 2005 

Mr. SALAZAR (for himself, Mr. CORZINE, Mr. NELSON of Florida, Mr. PRYOR, 

and Mr. CONRAD) submitted the following resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for the Pledge of Allegiance. 

Whereas Congress in 1954 added the words ‘‘under God’’ to 

the Pledge of Allegiance; 

Whereas the Pledge of Allegiance has for more than 50 years 

included references to the U.S. flag, the country, to our 

country having been established as a union ‘‘under God’’ 

and to this country being dedicated to securing ‘‘liberty 

and justice for all’’; 

Whereas the Congress in 1954 believed it was acting constitutionally when it revised the Pledge of Allegiance; 

Whereas this Senate of the 109th Congress believes that the 

Pledge of Allegiance is not an unconstitutional expression 

of patriotism; 
2 

SRES 244 ATS

Whereas patriotic songs, engravings on U.S. legal tender, 

engravings on Federal buildings also contain general references to ‘‘God’’; and 

Whereas the Congress expects that the U.S. Court of Appeals 

for the Ninth Circuit will review on appeal the decision 

of the District Court: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, 

2 SEC. 1. That the Senate strongly disapproves of the 

3 U.S. District Court ruling in Newdow v. The Congress of 

4 the United States of America, et al., holding the Pledge 

5 of Allegiance unconstitutional. 

6 SEC. 2. That the Senate authorizes and instructs the 

7 Senate Legal Counsel to continue to cooperate fully with 

8 the Attorney General in this case in order to vigorously 

9 defend the constitutionality of the Pledge of Allegiance. 

Æ
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 In connection with the quarterly report of ABCI Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Mark L. Baum, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to the best of my knowledge:
 
 1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
 Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 
 2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 
 Dated this November 4, 2004                             /s/   Mark L. Baum
 Mark L. Baum, CEO
 
 
 Dated this November 4, 2004            /s/   Mark L. Baum
 Mark L. Baum, CFO
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                       <C>                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 3-MOS                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999           DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000           DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           5,098             1,723,113
<SECURITIES>                                         0                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0               614,771
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                     0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,490,465             1,606,644
<PP&E>                                               0                     0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                     0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,495,563             3,944,528
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           33,351                16,351
<BONDS>                                              0                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                     0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                     0
<COMMON>                                             0                     0
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,462,212             3,928,177
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,495,563             3,944,528
<SALES>                                              0                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                17,044                     0
<CGS>                                                0                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0                     0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                20,509                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                     0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (3,465)                    0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           2,537,500                    0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                     0
<CHANGES>                                            0                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,534,035                     0
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0                     0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                     0


</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.3


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Fundtech Ltd. (the "Company") on Form
20-F for the year ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Yoram Bibring, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:  June 11, 2003



                                /s/ Yoram Bibring
                                -----------------------------
                                Yoram Bibring
                                Chief Financial Officer
                                (Principal Financial Officer)






A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Fundtech Ltd. and will be retained by Fundtech Ltd. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Before the First Division,

May 19, 1944

No. 49416.

#### Petition 6363-R of Waltham Watch Co. (Boston).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

A witness for the petitioning company testified that he checked the prices after the shipment *m*question had been made to see that the values of watch jewels were correctly represented; that many of the items came through at prices higher than on the original order and that the petitioner, when so advised, paid duty on the increased value basis; that at the time of entry the petitioner did not have information indicating that certain other items should have been entered at higher prices than invoiced. From the record presented the court was satisfied that the entry was made w'ithout intention to defraud the revenue of the United States or to conceal or misrepresent the facts. The petition was therefore granted.
EXHIBIT 32.1



             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
               SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

          In connection with the Trinity Learning Corporation (the
"Company") Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December
31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, Douglas D. Cole, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date:     February 23, 2004

     /S/ DOUGLAS D. COLE
     ------------------------
     Douglas D. Cole
     Chief Executive Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Trinity Learning Corporation and will be retained by it
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
Exhibit 11.1        


                                   COMPETITIVE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
                          Schedule of Computation of Earnings Per Share
                                        (Unaudited)


                                                    Quarter
                                                ended October 31,    
                                                1998        1997   


Net loss applicable to common stock         $ (315,448) $ (574,175)


Common and common equivalent shares -
    diluted:
  Basic weighted average common shares
    outstanding                              5,990,979   5,954,886
  Adjustments for assumed exercise of
    stock options                                1,012*     67,857*
  Adjustments for assumed exercise of
    stock warrants                                  --*     30,113*
  Weighted average number of common and
    common equivalent shares outstanding     5,991,991   6,052,856

Net loss per share of common stock:
    Basic and diluted                       $    (0.05) $    (0.10)


* Anti-dilutive.

These calculations are submitted in accordance with Regulation S-K item 601
(b) (11) which differs from the requirements of paragraph 13 of Statement
of Financial Accounting Standards No. 128 because they produce an
anti-dilutive result.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 429 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 429

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas the United States is one of the largest wine producing countries in the 
        world, with the United States wine, grape, and grape products industry 
        representing more than 1 percent of the $13,800,000,000 American economy 
        in 2007;
Whereas the wine and winegrape industry of Texas has an economic impact of 
        $1,000,000,000 on the economy of Texas;
Whereas since 2000, the wine and winegrape industry of Texas has experienced 
        tremendous growth, with nearly 90 percent of that growth resulting from 
        an increase in the number and revenue of small wineries producing less 
        than 5,000 gallons of wine each year; and
Whereas in 2005, the wine and winegrape industry of Texas--

    (1) included 113 wineries and 220 commercial growers of winegrapes on 
2,900 acres;

    (2) produced over 626,000 cases of wine;

    (3) provided the equivalent of 8,000 full-time jobs and paid over 
$234,000,000 in wages to workers;

    (4) generated revenue from wineries that produced an economic impact of 
$91,500,000 on the economy of Texas;

    (5) generated over $10,000,000 in revenue from vineyards in Texas;

    (6) attracted over 868,000 tourists to Texas, who spent over 
$220,000,000; and

    (7) generated over $69,000,000 in Federal, State, and local taxes: Now, 
therefore, be it

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That Congress--
            (1) recognizes the importance of the United States wine, 
        winegrape, and grape products industry to the American economy; 
        and
            (2) directs the Secretary of the Senate to transmit a copy 
        of this resolution to the Commissioner of the Texas Department 
        of Agriculture and the Texas Wine and Grape Growers Association 
        in Grapevine, Texas.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 27, 2008.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
110th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                            H. CON. RES. 429

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 Recognizing the importance of the United States wine industry to the 
                           American economy.
```
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Shining light on regulatorydark matter : majority staff report, 115th Congress [electronic resource].**
GuidanceReport|Appendices A-E|AppendicesEE-II|AppendicesJJ-NN|AppendicesK-O|AppendicesOO-QQ|AppendicesP-T|AppendicesU-Y|AppendicesZ-DD|
 
SuDoc Number:Y 4.G 74/7:R 26/24/

Item Number: 1016-C (online)

CGP systemNumber:001084051 
October 29, 2018
No. 53249.

#### W. T. Grant Company *v.*United States,

protests 654531-G, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Rao, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as the gloves which were the subject of *United States*v. *Julius Kayser & Co.*(33 C. C. P. A. 179, C. A. D. 333). The claim of the plaintiff was therefore sustained.
No. 45230.

#### Protests 845935-G, etc., of W. X. Huber Co. et al. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel sugar and creamer sets, salt and pepper shakers, trays, bonbon dishes, bonbon trays, candy jars, bowls, vases, candlesticks, cake dishes, center pieces, photo frames, relish dishes, boxes, bread plates, cake trays, and salad bowls, not plated, and similar to those the subject of Abstracts 39482 and 43050 were held dutiable at 40 percent under paragraph 339 as claimed.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 89 (Wednesday, May 9, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 26348]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-8839]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 2170]


Chugach Electric Association; Notice of Authorization for 
Continued Project Operation

May 2, 2007.
    On April 22, 2005, Chugach Electric Association, licensee for the 
Cooper Lake Hydroelectric Project, filed an application for a new or 
subsequent license pursuant to the Federal Power Act (FPA) and the 
Commission's regulations thereunder. The Cooper Lake Project is located 
on the Cooper Lake in South Central Alaska near Anchorage, AK.
    The license for Project No. 2170 was issued for a period ending 
April 30, 2007. Section 15(a)(1) of the FPA, 16 U.S.C. 808(a)(1), 
requires the Commission, at the expiration of a license term, to issue 
from year-to-year an annual license to the then licensee under the 
terms and conditions of the prior license until a new license is 
issued, or the project is otherwise disposed of as provided in section 
15 or any other applicable section of the FPA. If the project's prior 
license waived the applicability of section 15 of the FPA, then, based 
on section 9(b) of the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 558(c), 
and as set forth at 18 CFR 16.21(a), if the licensee of such project 
has filed an application for a subsequent license, the licensee may 
continue to operate the project in accordance with the terms and 
conditions of the license after the minor or minor part license 
expires, until the Commission acts on its application. If the licensee 
of such a project has not filed an application for a subsequent 
license, then it may be required, pursuant to 18 CFR 16.21(b), to 
continue project operations until the Commission issues someone else a 
license for the project or otherwise orders disposition of the project.
    If the project is subject to section 15 of the FPA, notice is 
hereby given that an annual license for Project No. 2170 is issued to 
Chugach Electric Association, for a period effective May 1, 2007 
through April 30, 2008, or until the issuance of a new license for the 
project or other disposition under the FPA, whichever comes first. If 
issuance of a new license (or other disposition) does not take place on 
or before April 30, 2008, notice is hereby given that, pursuant to 18 
CFR 16.18(c), an annual license under section 15(a)(1) of the FPA is 
renewed automatically without further order or notice by the 
Commission, unless the Commission orders otherwise. If the project is 
not subject to section 15 of the FPA, notice is hereby given that 
Chugach Electric Association, is authorized to continue operation of 
the Cooper Lake Project until such time as the Commission acts on its 
application for a subsequent license.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-8839 Filed 5-8-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
# C_2018013EN.01001202.xml

| 15.1.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 13/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.1.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 13/12

---

Judgment of the General Court of 20 November 2017 — Petrov and Others v Parliament

(Case T-452/15) (1)

1

((Member of the European Parliament - Refusal of access to the buildings of the Parliament - Third-country national - Article 21 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights - Discrimination on grounds of ethnic origin - Discrimination on grounds of nationality - Admissibility of a plea - Discrimination on grounds of political opinions - Equal treatment - Misuse of powers))

(2018/C 013/21)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Andrei Petrov (Saint Petersburg, Russia), Fedor Biryukov, (Moscow, Russia) and Alexander Sotnichenko (Saint Petersburg) (represented by: P. Richter, lawyer)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: N. Görlitz and M. Windisch, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of the Parliament’s decision of 16 June 2015 refusing the applicants access to its premises.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Messrs Andrei Petrov, Fedor Biryukovand and Alexander Sotnichenko to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Parliament. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Messrs Andrei Petrov, Fedor Biryukovand and Alexander Sotnichenko to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Parliament.

---

(1)  OJ C 363, 3.11.2015.

1

---
#### Geo. S. Bush & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States

No. 6481.

Entry No. 907, etc.

Invoices dated Kidderminster, England, February 21, 1941, etc.

Certified April 21, 1941, etc.

Entered at Portland, Oreg., June 16, 1941, etc.

(Decided November 1, 1946)

*Laiwence, Tuttle é Harper (George R. Tuttle*of counsel) for the plaintiffs.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oiiveb, Presiding Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importers on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar eases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
No. 53231.

#### Mary Chess, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 58560-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.