alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(Reap. Dec. 8291)

#### United States *v.*R. W. Smith

Entry No. 2750-H.

(Decided February 11, 1954)

*Warren E. Burger,*Assistant Attorney General, for the plaintiff.

*Philip Stein*for the defendant.

Ekwall, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement lias been submitted upon tbe following stipulation of counsel:

> It is hereby stipulated and agreed subject to the approval of the court, that at the time of exportation of the merchandise involved herein, UNIVERSAL MILL PLATE and such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade for exportation to the United States at U. S. $140.25 per metric ton, less $470.90 nondutiable charges packed.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that there was no higher foreign value for said merchandise at the time of exportation thereof.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that this case may be submitted on the foregoing stipulation.

On tbe agreed facts I find that export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of tbe Tariff Act of 1930, is tbe proper basis for tbe determination of tbe value of tbe Universal Mill Plate bere involved, and that sucb value is $140.25 per metric ton, less $470.90 nondutiable charges packed.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 90 (Thursday, May 10, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26620-26621]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-8926]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP06-200-025]


Rockies Express Pipeline LLC; Notice of Tariff Filing and 
Negotiated Rate

May 3, 2007.
    Take notice that on April 30, 2007, Rockies Express Pipeline LLC 
(REX) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, the following 
tariff sheets, to be effective May 1, 2007:

Twentieth Revised Sheet No. 22
Ninth Revised Sheet No. 24

    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed in accordance with the provisions of 
Section 154.210 of the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 154.210). 
Anyone filing an intervention or protest must serve a copy of that 
document on the Applicant. Anyone filing an intervention or protest on 
or before the intervention or protest date need not serve motions to 
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically

[[Page 26621]]

should submit an original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention 
to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#064043544549686a6f686355737676697472466063746528616970"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c0868592838faeaca9aea593b5b0b0afb2b480a6a5b2a3eea7afb6">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-8926 Filed 5-9-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Federal Depository Library ProgramPersistent URL Home Page      

# Target for /GPO/LPS94969 lost

The target resource for this PURL can no longer be traced. The following is a list of the targets this PURL was previously assigned to.

Powered by the Federal Depository Library Program.                A service of the U.S. Government Publishing Office.
<PAGE>
                               VARLEN CORPORATION
                               55 Shuman Boulevard
                              Naperville, IL 60566

                                                May 14, 1999

Mr. Ray Jean
1815 N. Pond Lane
Lake Forest, Ill.  60045

Dear Ray:

      This letter constitutes an amendment to the Change of Control Agreement
dated April 8, 1999 between you and Varlen Corporation ("Agreement").

      Pursuant to Section 6 of the Agreement, the Agreement is hereby amended
effective April 8, 1999 by adding the following Section 10(b), and relettering
Sections 10(b) through (f) as Sections 10(c) through (g):

            b. This Agreement is in lieu of any other payments due to the
      Executive exclusively as a result of a Change in Control and supersedes
      any prior agreement between the Executive and the Company with respect to
      the subject matter hereof.

      Please signify your consent to this amendment to the Agreement by signing
this letter in the space provided below.

                                          Very truly yours,

                                          VARLEN CORPORATION


                                          By: /s/ Greg A. Rosenbaum
Agreed to:


/s/ R. A. Jean         May 14, 1999
-------------------
Raymond Jean
April 26, 1951

No. 55505.

Suit 4645.

#### United States *v.*C. J. Tower & Sons.

C. D. 1224 affirmed March 6, 1951. C. A. D. 450.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 227 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 227

Expressing the sense of Congress that secondary schools should consider 
               starting school after 9:00 in the morning.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 4, 2007

   Ms. Zoe Lofgren of California submitted the following concurrent 
 resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Education and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Expressing the sense of Congress that secondary schools should consider 
               starting school after 9:00 in the morning.

Whereas scientific studies indicate that adolescents experience hormonal changes 
        that keep them awake at night;
Whereas most secondary schools begin classes at 7:30 or earlier in the morning;
Whereas most teen crime occurs between 3:00 and 6:00 in the afternoon and a 
        later start would result in a later school day;
Whereas many adolescents who do not get enough sleep are more likely to be 
        depressed, tardy, absent from school, involved in a car crash, and 
        obese; and
Whereas many adolescents do not get enough sleep to realize their full academic 
        potential: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of Congress that secondary schools should begin 
classes after 9:00 in the morning.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 11.2


                     GEOWASTE INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
                        COMPUTATION OF NET LOSS PER SHARE
                     FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1997

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                                                                                                Fully
                                                                                  Primary                      Diluted
<S>                                                                              <C>                          <C>

Weighted Average Common Shares
outstanding.............................................................         21,206,351                   21,206,351
Convertible debt........................................................             --                           --
Stock options and warrants outstanding..................................             --                           --
                                                                                 ----------                   ----------
Weighted average shares of common shares
outstanding.............................................................         21,206,351                   21,206,351
                                                                                ===========                   ==========
Net loss ...............................................................        $ (462,171)                  $ (462,171)
                                                                                ==========                   ===========
Loss per share..........................................................        $    (0.02)                  $    (0.02)
                                                                                ===========                  ===========
</TABLE>
(Reap. Dec. 9417)

#### States Mercantile Company *v.*United States

Entry No. 19903, etc.

(Decided May 12, 1959)

*Lawrence d Tuttle*for the plaintiff.

*George OoeJiran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Chief Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement enumerated in schedule “A,” hereto attached and made a part hereof, involve certain so-called sodium para-amino salicylate exported from Western Germany and entered at the port of San Francisco, Calif.

Stipulated facts, upon which the cases have been submitted, establish that the proper basis for appraisement of the merchandise in question is American selling price, as defined in section 402(g) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and that such statutory value therefor is as follows, according to the periods of exportation involved herein:

> Export Item Period Price

> sodium para-amino salicylate_ 1956 $2.20 per lb., less 1 per

> sodium para-amino salicylate_ 1957 centum, net packed

> sodium para-amino salicylate- 1958 $2.10 per lb., less 1 per centum, net packed $1.90 per lb., less 1 per centum, net packed

I so hold.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 21.1

                     SUBSIDIARIES OF MEDINEX SYSTEMS, INC.

   InterLink Services, Inc. (Washington corporation)

   The Online Medical Bookstore, Inc. (Idaho corporation)

   Net.Capitol, Inc. (Delaware corporation)

   MEDMarket, Inc. (Colorado corporation)

   Raintree Communications Corporation (Virginia corporation)

   Public Disclosure, Inc. (Delaware corporation)

   Politicallyblack.com, Inc. (Delaware corporation)

   Netivation.com Merger Three Corporation (Delaware corporation)

   U.S. Congress Handbooks, Inc. (Delaware corporation)

   Pinnacle Medsource, Inc. (Delaware corporation)
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > The Mobility of Electronic Technicians, 1940-52: The Work Experience, Training, and Personal Characteristics of Workers in a New Skilled Occupation

              																	United States. Bureau of Labor Statistics					 and 	United States. Air Force. 						*The Mobility of Electronic Technicians, 1940-52: The Work Experience, Training, and Personal Characteristics of Workers in a New Skilled Occupation : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 1150*,												Washington: 								U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 										1953,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/4467,			accessed on September 10, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
No. 54307.

#### Ignaz Strauss & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 110946-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of leather miniature boxing gloves, sandals, baseball gloves, and huaraches similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Ignaz Strauss*& *Co., Inc.*(37 C. C. P. A. 32, C. A. D. 415), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Before the First Division,

December 12, 1949

No. 53795.

protests 973655-G and 975986-G (New York).

#### W. T. Grant Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

It was stipulated that the glass marmalade jars and chrome-plated spoons are the same in all material respects as those the subject of Abstract 52871 and that said chrome-plated spoons are composed wholly or in chief value of copper, brass, steel, or other base metal, not plated with-platinum, gold, or silver. Accepting this stipulation as a statement of fact, the claims of the plaintiff were sustained.
No. 48769.

#### Protest 69292-K of Philipp Brothers, Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

From the evidence produced at the trial the court was of the opinion that the 226 bags, which were separated for export from the 533 bags, actually weighed net 24,506 pounds and the collector was directed to make refund accordingly.
Case No. 14s067.

#### UNITED STATES v. BROWN.

[1 Cranch. C. C. 210.] 1

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

Dec. Term, 1804.

Witness — Owner of Stolen Goode — Release of Interest in Pine.

The-owner ot the goods stolen, having released to the United States his interest in the fine, is a competent witness for the United States,, upon the piosecution under the act of congress."

[Cited in D. S. v. Tolson, Case No. 16,530.]

Indictment. [against Scipio Brown] for stealing a pair of boots, the property of Benjamin Birch. Benjamin Birch executed a release to the United States of all his right, to the fine, and was thereupon examined as a witness for the United States, generally, "upon the authority of the ease of U. S. v. McCann [Case No. 15,655], and of a former case, U. S. v. Clancey [Id. 14,800]; U. S. v. Hare [Id. 15.302], Bill of exceptions taken.

Verdict, guilty. Sentence, twenty stripes, and one dollar fine.
# C_2015096EN.01002602.xml

| 23.3.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 96/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.3.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 96/26

---

Action brought on 19 January 2015 — ZZ v Commission

(Case F-5/15)

(2015/C 096/34)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: S. Orlandi and T. Martin, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

The declaration of the illegality of Article 9 of the general implementing provisions (GIPs) of Article 11(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations and the annulment of the decision relating to transfer of the applicant’s pension rights into the European Union pension scheme, a decision which applies the new GIPs relating to Articles 11 and 12 of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Declare that Article 9 of the general implementing provisions of Article 11(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations is illegal; |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare that Article 9 of the general implementing provisions of Article 11(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations is illegal;

| — | Annul the decision of 16 January 2014 to credit the pension rights acquired by the applicant before his entry into service, in the context of the transfer of those pension rights into the pension scheme of the institutions of the European Union, under the general implementing provisions of Article 11(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations of 3 March 2011; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of 16 January 2014 to credit the pension rights acquired by the applicant before his entry into service, in the context of the transfer of those pension rights into the pension scheme of the institutions of the European Union, under the general implementing provisions of Article 11(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations of 3 March 2011;

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs.

---
DENY and Opinion Filed September 15, 2022 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-21-00746-CV 

KENNETH GORDON AND HARDCORE TRUCKING SOLUTIONS LLC, 

Appellants 

V. 

TRUCKING RESOURCES INC., Appellee 

On Appeal from the 366th Judicial District Court 

Collin County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. 366-02385-2019 

MEMORANDUM OPINION ON MOTION 

Before Justices Myers, Pedersen, III, and Garcia 

Opinion by Justice Garcia 

Appellants have filed a motion asking us to reverse a trial-court order 

increasing the amount required for appellants to supersede the judgment. See TEX.

R. APP. P. 24.4. After considering the motion and appellee’s response, we conclude 

that appellants have failed to show that they are entitled to the relief requested. 

 
 –2– 

Accordingly, we DENY the motion and affirm the trial court’s order. 

210746NF.P05 

/Dennise Garcia/ 

DENNISE GARCIA 

PRESIDING JUSTICE
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 120 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 120

To direct the General Accountability Office to conduct a full audit of 
 hurricane protection funding and cost estimates associated with post-
                     Katrina hurricane protection.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             January 25 (legislative day, January 5), 2011

  Mr. Vitter introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To direct the General Accountability Office to conduct a full audit of 
 hurricane protection funding and cost estimates associated with post-
                     Katrina hurricane protection.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUDIT OF HURRICANE PROTECTION FUNDING AND COST ESTIMATES.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 270 days after the date of 
enactment of this Act, the Government Accountability Office, in 
coordination with the National Academy of Engineering, shall conduct 
and submit to Congress a full audit of hurricane protection funding and 
cost estimates associated with post-Katrina hurricane protection.
    (b) Purposes.--The purposes of the audit shall be--
            (1) to identify the causes for the extraordinary 
        miscalculations in cost estimates of damage caused by Hurricane 
        Katrina that were completed before the date of enactment of 
        this Act;
            (2) to conduct an analysis of resources available and work 
        required with respect to hurricane protection funding and post-
        Katrina hurricane protection; and
            (3) to identify strategies to replenish reprogrammed 
        funding from out-year work to immediate needs.
                                 <all>
```
<SEQUENCE>2
<FILENAME>midkiffcert 033103.txt
                                                                 Exhibit 99.1



                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                              AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
         SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



               In connection with the Quarterly Report of Uptowner Inns, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Carl E. Midkiff
Chief Executive Officer
May 13, 2003
PUBLIC LAW 106–335—OCT. 19, 2000 114 STAT. 1309

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 4449:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 146 (2000):

Sept. 6, considered and passed House.

Oct. 6, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 106–335

106th Congress

An Act

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 1908 North

Ellamont Street in Baltimore, Maryland, as the ‘‘Dr. Flossie McClain Dedmond

Post Office Building’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

The facility of the United States Postal Service located at

1908 North Ellamont Street in Baltimore, Maryland, shall be known

and designated as the ‘‘Dr. Flossie McClain Dedmond Post Office

Building’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the facility referred to

in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Dr. Flossie

McClain Dedmond Post Office Building’’.

Approved October 19, 2000.

Oct. 19, 2000

[H.R. 4449]