Order : 2011-1-1 0 Served : Januar y 14 , 201 1

.i^^^^^r

. 

### f^^ X UNITE D STATE S O F AMERIC A § ^ H s DEPARTMEN T O F TRANSPORTATIO N %\^^^ $ OFFIC E O F TH E SECRETAR Y ''''sl^ ^ WASHINGTON , D.C

.

Issue db y th e Departmen t o f Transportatio n o n th e 14 * da y o f

January , 201 1

Essentia l Ai r

Servic e at ALLIANCE , NEBRASK A CHADRON , NEBRASK A
unde r 4 9 U.S.C

. 4173 1 e t

seq
. DOT-OST-2000-832 2

ORDE RREQUESTIN G PROPOSAL S

Summar y B y thi s order , th e Departmen t i s requestin g proposal s fro mcarrier s intereste di n providin g essentia l ai r

servic e (EAS ) at

Allianc e an dChadron , Nebraska , for th e nex t two-year perio dfro m Jun e 1,2011 , throug h May 31,2013 , with o r withou t subsidy

. Proposal s ar e du e Februar y 17 , 2011

. (Se e Appendi x A for a n are amap. )
Backgroun d B y Orde r 2009-4-19 , Apri l 27 , 2009 , th e Departmen t selecte dGrea t

Lake s Aviation , Ltd

. (Grea t Lakes ) t o provid e 1 2 nonsto p o r one-sto p roun dtrip s pe r

wee k fro mAllianc e an dChadro n t o Denve r usin g 19-passenge r

Beechcraf

t 1900- D aircraft , fro mJun e 1 , 2009 , throug h Ma y 31 , 2011 , for an annua l subsid y rat e o f $1,955,217 , fo r

both communities

. Reques t fo r Proposal s A s th e en do f

th e curren t

rat e ter mapproaches , w e ar e her e requestin g proposal s fro mcarrier s intereste di n providin g servic e a t Allianc e an dChadron , with o r withou t subsidy , t o b e file dn o late r tha n February 17 , 2011

. After tha t date , ou r staf f wil l docke t

th e proposals , thereb y makin g the m public

. Shortl y afterwards , w e wil l provid e asummary o f th e proposal s t o th e communitie s an das k- 2

-

the mt o submi t

thei r final comments

. W e wil l giv e ful l consideratio n t o al l proposal s tha t ar e timel y filed. '
Intereste dcarrier s shoul dprepar e thei r proposal s wit h every expectatio n tha t thei r initia l proposal s wil l represen t

\h&i i fina l an donl y proposals

. However , w e retai n th e discretio n t o negotiat e proposal s with carrier s whe n w e deemi t desirable

. W e als o retai n th e discretio n t o rejec t outrigh t al l unreasonabl e o r

unrealisti c proposal s an dsolici t ane w rovm

do f proposals

. W e ar e her e providin g intereste dcarrier s wit h som e basi c informatio n t o serv e a s guidanc e whe n the y prepar e thei r

proposals , but

w e wil l not

prescrib e aprecis e format for thei r proposals

. W e expec t proposal s t o adequatel y describ e th e servic e bein g propose dan dth e annua l amoun t o f subsid y bein g requested

. Th e applicant s ca n mak e thei r ow n judgment s a s t o th e leve l o f detai l the y wis h t o present ; however , the y migh t wan t t o includ e propose dschedule s a s wel l a s supportin g dat afor

thei r subsid y requests , suc h a s projecte dbloc k hours , revenue s an dexpenses
. W e strongl y encourag e clear , well-documente dproposal s tha t wil l facilitat e thei r

evaluatio n b y th e affecte dcommunitie s an dth e Department. ^
With respec t

t o Allianc e an dChadron , w e as k tha t carrier s submi t

proposal s for

tw o nonsto p o r one-sto p roun dtrip s pe r

day (1 2 roun dtrip s pe r

week ) wit h 15-seat

o r large r aircraf t t o Denve r Internationa l Airport , o r

anothe r suitabl e hu b wher e numerou s connection s t o th e nationa l ai r transportatio n syste mca n b e made

. Both communitie s ar e guarantee dservic e with 15-seat o r large r aircraft ; however , w e woul dals o entertai n proposal s for

eight

- o r nine-sea t aircraf t with an additiona l frequenc y (1 8 roun dtrip s pe r week ) fo r

eithe r o r bot h communities

. I

f th e Departmen t

receive s proposal s for

eight

- o r nine-seat , an dth e communit y ultimatel y support s th e service , i n effec t waivin g thei r

righ t t o 15

- seat o r large r aircraft , w e woul dconside r th e waive r

t o appl y onl y t o th e carrier-selectio n at hand , i.e

. w e woul dnot

assum e that

th e communit y woul dwaiv e thei r right s for al l time

. A s always , w e wil l formall y solici t th e conmiunities ' view s o n an y servic e option s w e receiv e befor e makin g along-ter mcarrie r selectio n decision

. I

f servic e with eight

- o r

nine-seat aircraf t i s proposed , servic e fro meac h conununit y t o th e hu b shoul db e nonstop

. Th e communitie s an dai r

carrier s ar e encourage dt o work togethe r i n advanc e of

th e du e dat e for proposal s t o craf

t aservic e patter n tha t

i s desirabl e t o th e communit y an dmeet s th e operationa l need s o f th e airline

. I n addition , carrier s shoul db e very clea r a s t o whethe r

aspecifi c

' Carrier s shoul

dnot expect the Departmen

t t o accept lat e filings. I n case s wher

e acarrie r propose s t o provid e essentia l ai r servic e withou

t subsid y an dw e determine tha

t servic e ca n b e reliabl

y providedwithou

t suc h compensation , w

e d o not proceedwit

h the carrier-selectio n case
. Instead , w e simpl y rel y o n tha t carrier' s subsidy

free servic e a s proposed

. 2 I n selecting acarrie

r t o provid e subsidizedessentia

l ai r service , 4 9 U.S.C

. 41733(c ) (1 ) direct s us t o conside r fou r factors : (1 ) servic e reliability ; (2 ) contractua l an dmarketin g arrangements wit

h alarge r carrie r a t the hub ; (3 ) interline arrangements wit

h alarge r carrie r a t th e hub ; an d(4 ) communit

y views

. I

n addition , th

e Consolidated Appropriation s Act , 2008 , Publi c La w 110-161 , provide s tha

t whe n selecting acarrie

r t o provid e EAS , the Departmen t ma y conside r the relativ e subsid

y requirements , thu s codifyin g afacto r tha t w e have consideredsinc e the inception o

f the program
. Interestedcarrier s shouldals o b e awar e tha t ou r genera l provision s governin

g essentia l ai r servic e wil

l b e includedi

n th e selection orde

r a s par t o f ou r authorization o

f subsid y fo r th e selected service

. Appendi

x C o f thi s orde r contain s thos e genera

l provisions

.- 3

-

community' s proposa l i s o n astand-alon e basis , o r whethe r i t i s part o f alarger , inseparabl e packag e with th e othe r

community

. W e encourag e proposal s tha t mee t thes e requirement s i n an efficient manner
. Carrier s ar e als o welcom e t o propos e mor e tha n on e servic e option , if the y choose ; the y nee dnot limi t themselve s t o thos e requirement s if

the y envisio n other , potentiall y mor e attractiv e servic e possibilitie s ~ different hub s o r length o f servic e terms , for

exampl e - with subsid y requirement s tha t remai n competitive

. Ne w Filin g Procedure s Carrie r proposal s shoul db e submitte dt o th e Departmen t with al l material s merge dint o asingle docimient

. Th e documen t wil l b e publishe do n Regulations.go v an deac h pag e shoul db e formatte dt o b e viewe donline

. Servic e an dTraffi c Histor y Fo r th e 12-mont

h perio dende dOctobe r

31 , 2010 , th e mos t

recen t perio dfor

whic h traffi c dat aar e available, Allianc e average d4. 5 enplanement s pe r da y an dChadro n average d6.0. 3 j ^ orde r t o assis t carrier s i n makin g thei r

traffi c an drevenu e forecasts , w e hav e include dhistorica l traffi c dat ai n Appendi x B

.
Othe r Carrie r Requirement s Th e Departmen t

i s responsibl e for

implementin g variou s Federa l statute s governin g lobbyin g activities , drug-fre e workplaces , an dnondiscrimination.' * Consequently , al l carrier s receivin g Federa l subsid y for

essentia l ai r

servic e mus t

certif y that the y ar e i n complianc e with Departmen t regulation s regardin g drug-fre e workplace s an dnondiscrimination , an dthos e carrier s whos e subsidie s excee d$100,00 0 ove r th e lif e o f th e rat e ter mmus t

als o certif

y tha t the y ar e i n complianc e with th e regulation s governin g lobbyin g activities

. Becaus e th e Departmen t i s prohibite dfro mpayin g subsid y t o carrier s tha t d o not submi t thes e documents , al l carrier s tha t pla n t o submi t

proposal s involvin g subsid y shoul db e awar e that th e selecte dcarrie r

wil l b e require dt o complet e th e require dcertifications

. Intereste dcarrier s requirin g mor e detaile d informatio n regardin g thes e requirement s shoul dcontac t th e Offic e o f

Aviatio n Analysi s at (202 ) 366-5903. 5

Communit y an dStat e Comment s Th e communitie s an dstat e ar e welcom e t o submi t comment s o n th e proposal s a t an y time

. A s note dearlier , however , w e wil l provid e asummary o f th e proposal s t o th e civi c partie s an das k the mt o submi t

thei r final comment s shortl y after Februar y 17 , 2011 , th e du e dat e for proposals

.
3 Se e Appendi x B fo r historica l traffi c data

. Enplanements represen t one-hal f o f tota l origin-and-destination traffic , an daverag e enplanements pe

r da y ar e base do n 7 7 weekday s an

dweekend s eac

h quarter , except

as noted

. ' * The regulation s applicabl e t o thes e area s are : (1 ) 4 9 CF RPar t 20 - Ne w restriction s o

n lobbying ; (2 ) 4 9 CF

RPar t 2 1 - Nondiscrimination i

n federally-assistedprogram s o f the Departmen

t o f Transportation - Effectuatio n o f titl e V I o f the Civil Right s Ac

t o f 1964 ; 4 9 CF

RPar t 27 - Nondiscrimination o

n th e basi s o f disabilit y i n programs an

d activitie s receiving o

r benefitin g fromFedera

l financial assistance ; an

d1 4 CF RPar t 38 2 - Nondiscrimination o n the basi s o f disabilit y i n ai r travel ; an d(3 ) 4 9 CF

RPar t 2 9 - Government-wid

e debarmen

t an dsuspension (non

procurement

) an dgovernment-wid

e requirement s fo

r drug-fre e workplac e (grants)

. 5 Th e certification s ar

e als o availabl e o

n the we b a t http://ostpxweb.dot.gov/aviation/index.html

.4

-

Thi s orde r

i s issue dunde r

authorit y delegate di n 4 9 CF R1.56a(f ) an dre-delegate dt o th e Director , Offic e o f

Aviatio n Analysis

.
ACCORDINGLY , 1

. W e reques t

that carrier s intereste di n providin g essentia l ai r servic e at

Allianc e an dChadron , Nebraska , for

th e two-year

perio dfro mJun e 1 , 2011 , throug h Ma y 31 , 2013 , submi t thei r proposals , with o r

withou t request s for

subsidy , n o late r

tha n Februar y 17 , 2011

. Th e proposal s shoul db e e-maile dt o EAS@dot.gov , with th e title : "Proposa l t o Provid e Essentia l Ai r Servic e a t Allianc e and/o r

Chadron , Nebrask a(Docke t DOT-OST-2000-8322) " ;6
2

. Thi s docke t

wil l remai n ope n unti l furthe r orde r o f th e Department ; an d
3

. W e wil l serv e copie s o f thi s orde r

o n th e Mayors o f

Allianc e an dChadron , th e manager s o f Allianc e Municipa l Airpor t an dChadro n Mimicipa l Airport , an dth e partie s liste di n Appendi x D

. Person s entitle dt o petitio n th e Departmen t for revie w o f

thi s orde r

unde r th e Department' s Aviatio n Economi c Regulations , 1 4 CFR385.50 , mus t file suc h petition s withi n te n (10 ) day s afte r th e dat e o f

servic e o f

thi s order

.

Thi s orde r

wil l b e effectiv e immediately , an dth e filin g of apetitio n fo r

revie w shal l not

preclud e it s effectiveness

. By :

TOD D M

. ROMA N Directo r Offic e o f Aviatio n Analysi s (SEAL )

A n electroni c versio n o f

thi s documen t

i s availabl e a t

http://www.resulations.so v

^ Question s regarding filings i n respons e t

o thi s orde r ma y b e directedvi aelectroni c mai l t o Kevi n Schlemme

r a t kevin.schlemmer@dot.gov o r viaphon e a t (202 ) 366-3176

.

### Appendix A



## ARE A MA P

J X

-

/ •-I

- - (

Thi s ma p i s provide db y Sabre ® AirVision'^'' ^ Profi t Essential s an di s bein g use dwit h expres s permissio n o f

th e copyrigh t holder , Sabr e Airlin e Solutions®

.Appendi x B Pag e 1 o f

2

Traffi c Histor

y 7
Alliance , N E (AIA )

Yea r Mont h Quarte

r Inboun

d Outboun

d Total s 200 9 200 9 200 9 200 9 200 9 200 9 200 9 200 9 200 9 200 9

200 9 200 9 201 0 201 0 201 0 201 0 201 0 201 0 201 0 201 0 201 0 201 0 

### 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 0

1 1 1 2 

### 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 0 

### 1 1 1 2 2 2 3 3 3 4

4 4 1 1 1 2 2 2 3 3 3 4 10 4 7 3 8 4 

### 12 0 12 0 13 8 12 8 14 2 11 4 7 2



### 10 3 11 1 9 9 6 3 

### 11 9 10 0 13 4 19 7 12 3 12 1 9 8 

### 15 7 11 3 8 8 8 1 

### 11 6 13 3 15 3 13 3 14 5 12 4 6 0



### 12 8 12 1 8 8 7 1 

### 12 9 8 5 

### 12 2 14 1 12 6 12 5 11 2 13 4 21 7 16 1 16 5 23 6 25 3 29 1 26 1 28 7 23 8 13 2 2,24 1


### 23 1 23 2 18 7 13 4 24 8 18 5 25 6 33 8 24 9 24 6 21 0 29 1 2,80 7
Averag e dail y enplanement s a t Allianc e (12-month s endin g 10/31/2010 ) - 4.5 ^

' Sourc e - T-lO O Marke t

Report , Passenger s i n Schedule dPassenge r Service

. Great

Lake s Airline s servic e only

.
° Averag e dail y enplanements = tota l traffi c fo r th e mos t recen t 12-mont h perio d(2,80 7 passengers ) divide db y 31 3 servic e day s divide db y 2

.

### Appendix B Pag e 2 o f 2 Chadron , NE(CDR) '

Yea r Mont h Quarte r Inboun dOutboundTotal s 200 9 200 9 200 9 200 9 200 9 200 9 200 9 200 9 200 9 200 9

200 9 200 9 201 0 201 0 201 0 201 0 201 0 201 0 201 0 201 0 201 0 201 0 

### 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 0

1 1 1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 0 1 1 1 2 2 2 3 3 3 4

4 4 1 1 1 2 2 2 3 3 3 4 15 5 12 1 14 3 15 5 14 4 16 7 20 0 19 1 14 4 17 8

21 4 16 0 15 7 12 0 19 1 11 5 15 4 19 6 21 3 17 2 15 8 15 8 11 9 13 2 10 4 16 1 17 0 17 6 18 7 14 9 15 1 17 9

18 3 16 4 12 8 10 6 12 7 10 8 15 0 15 7 17 9 15 8 14 5 13 8 27 4 25 3 24 7 31 6 31 4 34 3 38 7 34 0 29 5 35 7 3,12 6


### 39 7 32 4 28 5 22 6 31 8 22 3 30 4 35 3 39 2 33 0 30 3 29 6 3,75 1


### Averag e daily enplanement s a t Chadron (12-month s ending 10/31/2010 ) - 6.0' °

" Sourc e - T-lO O Marke t Report , Passenger s i n Schedule dPassenge r Service

. Great

Lake s Airline s servic e only

. ^ ^ Averag e dail y enplanements = tota l traffi c for th e mos t recen t 12-mont h perio d(3,75 1 passengers ) divide db y 31 3 servic e day s divide db y 2

.Appendi x C

Exampl e o f

Genera l Term s an dCondition s for Essentia l Ai r

Servic e Th e carrie r

understand s tha t

i t ma y forfei t

it s compensatio n for

an y flights tha t

i t doe s no t operat e i n conformanc e with th e term s an dstipulation s o f th e rat e order , includin g th e servic e plan s outline di n th e orde r an dan y othe r

significan t

elements o f

th e require d service , withou t

prio r approval

. Th e carrie r

understand s that

an aircraf t take-of f an d landin g a t it s schedule ddestinatio n constitute s acomplete dflight; absen t an explanatio n supportin g subsid y eligibilit y fo r aflight tha t ha s not bee n completed , suc h a s certai n weathe r cancellations , onl y complete dflights ar e considere deligibl e for subsidy

. I n addition , if

th e carrie r

doe s no t schedul e o r

operat e it s flights i n full conformanc e with th e orde r for asignifican t

period , i t may jeopardiz e it s entir e subsid y clai mfor th e perio di n question

. I

f th e carrie r

contemplate s an y suc h change s beyon dth e scop e o f th e orde r durin g th e applicabl e perio do f thes e rates , i t

mus t firs t notif y th e Offic e o f

Aviatio n Analysi s i n writin g an dreceiv e writte n approva l fro mth e Departmen t t o b e ensure do f full compensation

. Shoul dcirciunstance s warrant , th e Departmen t ma y locat e an dselec t areplacemen t

carrie r t o provid e servic e o n thes e routes

. Th e carrie r mus t complet e al l flights that

ca n b e safel y operated ; flights tha t overfl y point s fo r

lac k o f traffi c wil l not

b e compensated

. I n determinin g whethe r subsid y paymen t

for adeviatin g flight

shoul db e adjuste do r

disallowed , th e Departmen t wil l conside r

th e exten t

t o whic h th e goal s o f

th e progra mar e me t

an dth e exten t

o f acces s t o th e nationa l ai r transportatio n syste m provide dt o th e community

. I f th e Departmen t

unilaterally , eithe r

partiall y o r

completely , terminate s o r reduce s payment s for servic e o r change s servic e requirement s a t aspecifi c locatio n provide dfor unde r thi s order , then , at th e en do f

th e perio dfor

whic h th e Departmen t

doe s mak e payment s i n th e stipulate damount s o r a t th e stipulate dservic e levels , th e carrie r ma y ceas e t o provid e servic e t o tha t specifi c locatio n withou t regar dt o an y requiremen t for notic e o f suc h cessation. Thos e adjustment s i n th e level s o f subsid y and/o r

servic e tha t

ar e mutuall y agree dt o i n writin g b y th e Departmen t an dcarrie r

d o not constitut e atota l o r

partia l reductio n o r

cessatio n o f

payment

. Subsid y contract s ar e subjec t to , an dincorporat e b y reference , relevan t statute s an d Departmen t

regulations , a s the y ma y b e amende dfro mtim e t o time

. However , an y suc h statutes , regulations , o r

amendment s theret o shal l not operat e t o controver t

th e foregoin g paragraph

. Fund s ar e not

currentl y availabl e for

performanc e unde r

thi s solicitatio n beyon d[DATE]

. Th e Government' s obligatio n for performanc e imde r

thi s solicitatio n beyon d[DATE] , i s contingen t

upo n th e availabilit y o f

appropriate dfund s fro mwhic h paymen t for service s ca n b e made

. N o lega l liabilit y o n th e part o f th e Governmen t

for an y paymen t

may aris e for performanc e unde r

thi s orde r

beyon d[DATE] , unti l fund s ar e mad e availabl e t o th e Departmen t

fo r performance

. I

f fund s ar e not

mad e availabl e for

performanc e beyon d [DATE] , th e carrie r

wil l receiv e notic e i n writin g b y th e Department

. Al l claim s for

paymen t mus t b e submitte dwithi n 6 0 day s o f th e las t da y o f servic e provide dimde r

thi s order

.

### Appendix D Schedule dAi r

Carriers , Contiguou s U S an dPuert o Ric o Ai r GrecoAVing s Ai r Ai r Sunshine , Inc

. Ai r Sunshine , Mirmohamma dAdil i Ai r West , Inc. , Joh n Raat z Ai r Wisconsin , Annett e Dal y Ai r Wisconsin , Ji mRanki n Airlin e Associates , Bil l Mishk Alask aAirlines , Jef

f Col e Alask aAiriines , Sand y Sinic k Allegian t Air , Brian Davi s America n Airiines , Carl Nelso n America n Eagle , Jeffre y Hart z Atlanti c Southeast , Jo n Lindlie f Atlanti s Southeast , Roge r Westo n Aviatio n Technologies/Charte r Ai r Transpor t Bemidj i Aviation , Cori Rud e Bemidj i Aviation , Arle n Rinkenberge r Cap e Air , Andre w Bonne y Cap e Air , Dan Wol f Cap e Air , J

. Flahert y Classi c Aviation , Ton y Henderso n Colga n Air , Mik e Colga n Colga n Air , Kevi n Scott CommutAir , And y Pric e CommutAir , Joe l Raymon d Consultant , Robert

Silverber g Continental , Bruc e Keine r Continental , Da

n Weis s Continental , Lorry Halloway Delta , Anthon y Canitan o Delta , Da n Shuma n Delta , Jef f Morga n Delta , Jo e Esposit o Delta , Kare n Zachar y Delta , Kristal Murph y Delta , Sasch aVanderbelle n DHS , Bil l Ragan DHS , Davi dBemie r Dorad o Jet s Dorad o Jets , Mar

k McKenn a Er aAviation , Lor i Goodma n Executiv e Airiines , Kat e Sole d Frontie r Flying , Bo b Hajducovtc h Frontier , Danie l Shur z Frontlin e Aviatio n Ge mAir , Dan Schroede r Ge mAir , JoAn n Wolter s Grea t Lakes , Chuc k

Howel l Great Lakes , Dou g Vos s Gulfstream , Dav e Hackett Gulfstream , Micke y Bowman Gulfstream , T

. Coope r Horizo n Air , Da

n Russ o Horizo n Air , Jennife r

Thompso n Horizo n Air , Mik e McQuee n Horizo n Air , Jef

f Col e ICEPR , Lui s Irizarry Intrepi dIntemat l Air , Ric k Eyk Islan dAi r Charters , Lind aHous e Je t Air , Danie l Wolfor d Kenmor e Air , Ti mBrook s McCal l Aviation , Da n Scott McCal l Aviation , Michell e Mesaba , Joh n Spanjer s Mesaba , Ma

x Shemes h MidStar Airiines , Jeffrey Fonne r Midwes t Airlines , Gre g Aretaki s M N Aviation , Jos e Maldonad o Mult i Aero , Dame a Multi Aero , Shan e Stor z Norther n Ai r

Cargo , Davi dKar

p Norther n Ai r

Cargo , Eri c Va n Ande l Northwest , Ti mMcDonal d Northwest , Aaro n Murra y NYDC , Heno k

Aray a OST , Brian Swanso n OST , Denni s DeVan y OST , Kevi n Adam s OST , Kevi n Schlemme r OST , Michae l Marti n Pacifi c Aviatio n Group , Crai g Garric k Pacifi c Aviatio n Group , Ro n Py e Pacifi c Wings, Fran k

For d Pacifi c Wings, Gre g Kahlstor f PenAir , Dann y Seybert PenAir , Scott

Bloomquis t Pinnacl e Airiines , Jennife r Gammil l Pinnacl e Airiines , Megan Rosi a Pinnacl e Airiines , Phi l Ree d Planemasters, Inc

. Joh n Kessle r Planemasters , Inc

. Pau l Berline r Planemasters , Inc

. Tod dDeSimon e Raytheon , Mike Scheld t Saab Group , Poll y Prelinge r Scenic , Mar

y Schneide r Scenic , Mitz i Daine s Seaborn e Airiines , Shaw n Lewi s SeaPort Airlines , Danie l Hellan d SeaPortAVing s o f

Alaska , Ji mDay SeaPort/Wing s o f

Alaska , Nate Vallie r SeaPortAVing s o f

Alaska , Ro b McKinne y Shuttl e America , Jerry Balsan o SkyWest , BradRawso n SkyWest , Eri c Christense n SkyWest , Michae l Thompso n Sovereig n Air , Bo b Kam s Sovereig n Air , Loi s R

. Barto n Tatonduk , Robert

Evert s Tatonduk , Rober t

Ragar Tradewind , Eri c Zipki n TransStates , Fre dOxle y TransStates , Gerry Wigmor e Transpor t Azumah , Joe l Anabilah-Azuma h United , Alici aGabrie l United , Jame s Stame s U S Airways , Benjami n Slocu m U S Airways , Howar dKas s U S Airways , Jaso n Reisinge r Warbelow s Ai r

Ventures , Ar

t Warbelo w