alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### Geology and ground-water hydrology of the Heart River irrigation project and the Dickinson area, North Dakota

By: Paul C. TychsenHerbert A. Swenson

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/cir34

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
#### United States *v.*Railway Express Agency, Inc.

No. 8026.

Entered at Los Angeles, Calif.

Entry No. 3807.

(Decided July 17, 1951)

*David N. Hdelstein,*Assistant Attorney-General *(John J. Antus*and *Charles J. Wagner,*special attorneys), for the plaintiff.

*Lawrence, Tuttle <& Harper (George R. Tuttle*of counsel) for the defendant.

FoRD, Judge:

This appeal involves the question of the proper dutiable value of certain accordions exported from Italy and entered at the port of Los Angeles, Calif. In making entry of this merchandise, the importer included as a part of the entered value an item of packing in the sum of $112.50. It appears from the record before me that this item of packing was in error, and that it should have been $12.50 instead of $112.50.

I therefore find the proper dutiable value of the merchandise covered by this appeal to be the entered value less $100, this item being the excess included as packing in error. However, in view of section 503 of the Tariff Act of 1930, the collector in liquidation will take duty on the entered value, this being higher than the final appraised value. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
Served: March 13, 2014

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

WASHINGTON, D.C.

Issued by the Department of Transportation

on the 13th day of March, 2014

 Essential Air Service at

 CRESCENT CITY, CALIFORNIA

Under 49 U.S. C. § 47131 et seq.

 DOCKET DOT-OST-1997-2649

 

NOTICE EXTENDING THE DEADLINE FOR PROPOSALS

By Order 2014-2-4, issued on February 5, 2014, the Department requested proposals for 

Essential Air Service (EAS) at Crescent City, California, with proposals due no later than 

March 13, 2014. On March 13, 2014, SkyWest Airlines requested an extension to the deadline

until March 21, 2014.

We will grant the extension request. Proposals for Crescent City, California, are now due 

March 21, 2014.

KEVIN D. SCHLEMMER

Chief, EAS and Domestic Analysis Division

An electronic version of this document is available at

http://www.regulations.gov

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Case No. 9,244.

#### MASON v. MASI.

[5 Cranch, C. C. 397.] 1

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

March Term, 1838.

W itness — Competency— Indorser.

An indorser of a promissory note is a competent witness for the defendant in an action by the indorsee against the maker.

[See Bank of Alexandria v. Clarke, Case No. 844.)

[This was an action at law by Milo Mason’s administrator against Seraphim Masi.)

Assumpsit, upon the defendant’s promissory note to Nicholas Harper, and by him indorsed to the plaintiff’s intestate.

Mr. Morfit, for defendant,

offered the in-dorser, Nicholas Harper, as a witness to prove payment by the defendant; and cited White v. Kibling, 11 Johns. 128; Cooper v. Davies, 1 Esp. 463; Charrington v. Milner, Peake, 8, and Starkie, Ev. pt. 4, p. 300.

1

 [Reported by Hon. William Cranch, Chief Judge.)

THE COURT

(THRUSTON, Circuit Judge, contra, and the other judges doubting)

per*1048mitted Mm to be sworn and examined, to prove payment by the defendant; and said they would hear a motion for a new trial if the verdict should be for the defendant.

Verdict for the plaintiff, $50, with interest from the 25th of March, 1S35.

Judgment for the plaintiff.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 29, 2020

No. 04

- 19

- 00808

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF K.E.R., K.R.R., Q.A.R., AND M.C., CHILDREN

From the 37th Judicial Distric t Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018

- PA

- 00816 Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellee has filed a motion for an extension of time to file a brief. We grant the motion

and order appellee’s brief filed by February 10, 2020

. This is an accelerated appeal of an order in a suit for termination of the parent

- child relationship that must be disposed of by this court within 180 days of the date the notice of appeal was filed in the trial court. See Tex. R. Jud.

Admin. 6.2. Because of the time constraints governing the disposition of this appeal, further requests for extensions of time will be disfavored.

_____________________________ ____ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 29th day of January, 2020

.

_______________________ ____________ M ichael A. C ruz
, Clerk of Court
No. 62103.

#### Jay Trading Co. *v.*United States,

protests 166676-K and 172075-K (New York).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of olives in brine similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Moscahlades Bros., Inc.*v. *United States*(39 Cust. Ct. 127, C. D. 1917), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
. .- 

485 

‘OFFICEi OF TNX Ak’OFiNIZY GENERAL OF a 

AUSTIN 

,.-=- &- .::-- 

_.I 

,. : 

. 

;: 
.I 

: 

:. 

. 
,: .- 

4-l 

. . 

/ 

.: 

: 
.- . 

490 

: 

i‘ 

. . 

. . . 

:. 

_’ 

. . . . . 

; ~$ b s8o o I& o uu,w~8b o so ~lu7 

&a8 t&o Quo or B vo* owuE* Jb Irex*, 951, k 

..w l m 

-. 
_’ . 

‘. 

. . 
492 
0.’ ., 

49: 

-... 

i:: 

:: .:, 

.’ .._ 

.I 

..;‘.. s 

. 

._.. 

._. 1 

:- 

. : 

;. 

.:: 

_. 

.~ 1 : 

.L.’ . 

.I 

; : > .> 

; 

..:,. .’ 

; 
.; 

-. .- 4.94 

:’ . . 

:~. . . 

.r 

, 
.
Exhibit 32.1








Certification








Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63


of Title 18, United States Code)





Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.  1350), the undersigned officer of SonomaWest Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify that:





The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 (the “Form 10-Q”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated: November 15, 2010











/s/ Walker R. Stapleton


Walker R. Stapleton,


Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer











A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to SonomaWest Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by SonomaWest Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
* The court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-40136

Summary Calendar

 

JEFFREY BENSON DURHAM,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE,

INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION, ET AL.,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 9:96-CV-89

- - - - - - - - - -

August 7, 1997

Before WISDOM, DUHE’, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Jeffrey Benson Durham, Texas prisoner # 670219, filed a

civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against various prison

officials. The district court dismissed Durham’s complaint as

frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915. A § 1915 dismissal is reviewed

for abuse of discretion. Eason v. Thaler, 14 F.3d 8, 10 (5th

Cir. 1994). 

Durham asserts that the defendants were deliberately
No. 97-40136

- 2 -

indifferent to his serious medical needs and had retaliated

against him for filing grievances. See Farmer v. Brennan, 511 U.S. 825,

___, 114 S. Ct. 1970, 1980 (1994); Woods v. Smith, 60 F.3d 1161, 1166 (5th Cir. 1995), cert.

denied, 116 S. Ct. 800 (1996). 

With respect to Durham’s allegations that Dr. Browne changed

his medical classification based on x-rays alone without looking

at his ankle and became belligerent and falsified Durham’s

medical file following Durham’s filing of a grievance, the

district court abused its discretion in dismissing the claims of

deliberate indifference and retaliation as being without a basis

in fact or law. This dismissal of Dr. Browne is VACATED.

The district court did not abuse its discretion in

dismissing the remainder of the claims against the other medical,

security, and supervisory personnel. This portion of the

dismissal is AFFIRMED.

Durham’s motion for appointment of counsel on appeal is

DENIED. We do not consider whether exceptional circumstances

exist which may require the appointment of counsel as this case

proceeds to trial.

The case is hereby remanded to the district court for

additional proceedings consistent with this opinion.

AFFIRMED IN PART; VACATED AND REMANDED IN PART; MOTION

DENIED.
EXHIBIT
32.1








CERTIFICATION
UNDER SECTION 906


OF
THE


SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Unico American Corporation
(the "Company") for the period ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Erwin Cheldin, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to the best of my knowledge:





1.
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
  and





2.
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.











/s/  Erwin
Cheldin





Name:     Erwin
Cheldin


Title:       Chairman
of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer


Date:       May
15, 2008














A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to Unico American Corporation, and will be
retained by Unico American Corporation, and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 273 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 7 (legislative day, FEBRUARY 6), 2008 

Received and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the 50th Anniversary of the National Academy 

of Recording Arts & Sciences. 

Whereas, in 1957, a group of visionary leaders gathered at 

the famed Brown Derby in Los Angeles to form The National Academy of Recording Arts & Sciences; 

Whereas The Recording Academy soon created the GRAMMY 

Award which is the world’s most visible and prestigious 

award for music; 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
2 

HCON 273 RFS 

Whereas the GRAMMY was created as a peer award, given 

by music makers, for music makers, to honor the highest 

quality recording music of the year without regard to 

sales or chart position; 

Whereas The Recording Academy expanded its mission beyond recognition of musical excellence to include 

groundbreaking professional development, cultural enrichment, advocacy, education, and human services programs; 

Whereas through its 12 chapters across America, The Recording Academy serves more than 18,000 musicians, 

singers, songwriters, producers, engineers, and other 

music professionals; 

Whereas, in 1989, The Recording Academy created the 

GRAMMY Foundation to cultivate the understanding, 

appreciation, and advancement of the contribution of recorded music to American culture, from the artistic and 

technical legends of the past to the still unimagined musical breakthroughs of future generations of music professionals; 

Whereas that same year, The Recording Academy created 

MusiCares, to provide a safety net of critical assistance 

for music people in times of need; 

Whereas the GRAMMYs on the Hill Initiative, based in 

Washington, DC, works to advance the rights of the 

music community through advocacy, education, and dialogue; and 

Whereas through this initiative, The Recording Academy has 

become a leading advocate for music makers: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That Congress congratulates The Recording 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
3 

HCON 273 RFS 

1 Academy during its 50th GRAMMY celebration for its im2 portant work in improving the environment for music and 

3 music makers. 

Passed the House of Representatives February 6, 

2008. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.2

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OFPRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of SonoSite, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2005, I, Michael J. Schuh, Chief Financial Officer of SonoSite, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)such Annual Report on Form 10-K of SonoSite, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2005, fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)the information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K of SonoSite, Inc. for the year endedDecember 31, 2005, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operationsof SonoSite, Inc.

| | /S/     MICHAEL J. SCHUH                       
| | -----------------------------------------------
| | Michael J. Schuh                               
| | Vice President-Finance, Chief Financial Officer
| | and Treasurer                                  
| | (Principal Financial Officer)                  

March 15, 2006

82

---
RE: Boiler MACT PreambleRule

Higgins, Cortney to

:

Jim Eddinger, Mary Johnson 12/20/2012 11:52 AM

Cc

:

RobertJ Wayland

From: "Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov>

To: Jim Eddinger/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Mary Johnson/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

HI Jim,

Any update on the question below regarding the area source rule?

Thanks,

Cortney

From: Eddinger.Jim@epamail.epa.gov [mailto:Eddinger.Jim@epamail.epa.gov] 

Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2012 7:02 PM

To: Higgins, Cortney

Cc: Wayland.Robertj@epamail.epa.gov

Subject: RE: Boiler MACT PreambleRule

Cortney,

Our monitoring folks did edit those equations based on the earlier comments, but I will have them look at 

this comment tomorrow if they feel Additional changes areneeded.

Jim

_______________

James A. Eddinger

Energy Strategies Group

Sector Policies and Programs Division

919-541-5426

"Higgins, Cortney" ---12/19/2012 05:29:26 PM---Hi Jim, Below are a couple of interagency comments 

that have come in today on this afternoon's draft

From: "Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov>

To: Jim Eddinger/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 12/19/2012 05:29 PM

Subject: RE: Boiler MACT PreambleRule
Hi Jim,

Below are a couple of interagency comments that have come in today on this afternoon’s drafts:

Major Source Rule.

Page 198. For consistency with equation 10, we believe the symbols X1 and Y1 in equation 11 should be small x 

prime (small x with a bar over the top) and small y prime (small y with a bar over the top). (Rephrased version of 

comment that was submitted by the SSC on 18 December 2012.) As an aside, in equation 10, perhaps X1 and Y1 

should be Xi and Yi since it is a summation equation from i to n.

Area Source Rule. 

Consider revising the definitions of 10-day rolling average and 30-day rolling average in the area source rule to be 

consistent with the major source rule to incorporate the 240 hour and 720 hour of valid operating data criteria, 

respectively. Both rules should probably exclude hours during startup and shutdown as well as unit down time, 

from the rolling average calculations. 

Regards,

Cortney

From: Eddinger.Jim@epamail.epa.gov [mailto:Eddinger.Jim@epamail.epa.gov] 

Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2012 3:50 PM

To: Higgins, Cortney

Cc: Wayland.Robertj@epamail.epa.gov

Subject: RE: Boiler MACT PreambleRule

Cortney,

Please replace the redline version I sent you earlier this afternoon with this version. A few edits were 

made to the fourth year language on pages 26 -28.

(See attached file: EO 12866 NESHAP for Major Sources Industrial, Commercial, and 

Institutional Boilers and Process Heaters 2060 121912 redline w 121312v2.docx)

Jim

_______________

James A. Eddinger

Energy Strategies Group

Sector Policies and Programs Division

919-541-5426
#### F. R. Tripler & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States

No. 6417.

Entry No. 3811, etc.

Invoices dated London, England, July 16, 1941, etc.

Certified July 19, 1941, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., August 21, 1941, etc.

(Decided October 4, 1946)

*Jordan & Klingaman*for the plaintiffs.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendaiit.

Tilson, Judge:

The appeals listed in schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon a stipulation to the effect that the issues involved in said appeals are the same in all material respects as -the issues decided in *United States*v. *Pitcairn,*C. A. D. 334, and the record therein has been admitted in -evidence in this case.

Accepting this stipulation as a statement of fact and following the cited authority, I find and hold the proper dutiable export values of the merchandise covered by said appeals to be the values found by the appraiser, less any amounts added by the importers on entry to meet advances made by the appraiser in similar cases then pending on appeal.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 379 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 24 (legislative day, JUNE 23), 2008 

Received 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Providing for a conditional adjournment of the House of 

Representatives and a conditional recess or adjournment 

of the Senate. 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That when the House adjourns on the legisla3 tive day of Thursday, June 26, 2008, or Friday, June 27, 

4 2008, on a motion offered pursuant to this concurrent res5 olution by its Majority Leader or his designee, it stand 

6 adjourned until 2 p.m. on Tuesday, July 8, 2008, or until 

7 the time of any reassembly pursuant to 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

HCON 379 RDS 

1 section 2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs 

2 first; and that when the Senate recesses or adjourns on 

3 any day from Thursday, June 26, 2008, through Friday, 

4 July 4, 2008, on a motion offered pursuant to this concur5 rent resolution by its Majority Leader or his designee, it 

6 stand recessed or adjourned until noon on Monday, July 

7 7, 2008, or such other time on that day as may be speci8 fied in the motion to recess or adjourn, or until the time 

9 of any reassembly pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent 

10 resolution, whichever occurs first. 

11 SEC. 2. The Speaker of the House and the Majority 

12 Leader of the Senate, or their respective designees, acting 

13 jointly after consultation with the Minority Leader of the 

14 House and the Minority Leader of the Senate, shall notify 

15 the Members of the House and the Senate, respectively, 

16 to reassemble at such place and time as they may des17 ignate if, in their opinion, the public interest shall warrant 

18 it. 

Passed the House of Representatives June 24, 2008. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS