alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1288 

To exempt certain class A CDL drivers from the requirement to obtain 

a hazardous material endorsement while operating a service vehicle with 

a fuel tank containing 3,785 liters (1,000 gallons) or less of diesel 

fuel. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 28, 2011 

Mr. ROBERTS (for himself, Mr. NELSON of Nebraska, Mr. MORAN, and Mr. 

JOHANNS) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To exempt certain class A CDL drivers from the requirement 

to obtain a hazardous material endorsement while operating a service vehicle with a fuel tank containing 3,785 

liters (1,000 gallons) or less of diesel fuel. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. HAZARDOUS MATERIAL ENDORSEMENT EX4 EMPTION. 

5 (a) EXCLUSION.—Section 5117(d)(1) of title 49, 

6 United States Code, is amended— 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1288 IS

1 (1) in subparagraph (B), by striking ‘‘and’’ at 

2 the end; 

3 (2) in subparagraph (C), by striking the period 

4 at the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

5 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘(D) a service vehicle carrying diesel fuel 

7 in quantities of 3,785 liters (1,000 gallons) or 

8 less that is— 

9 ‘‘(i) driven by a class A commercial 

10 driver’s license holder who is a custom har11 vester, an agricultural retailer, an agricul12 tural business employee, an agricultural 

13 cooperative employee, or an agricultural 

14 producer; and 

15 ‘‘(ii) clearly marked with a placard 

16 reading ‘Diesel Fuel’.’’. 

17 (b) EXEMPTION.—Section 31315(b) of title 49, 

18 United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the 

19 following: 

20 ‘‘(8) HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ENDORSEMENT

21 EXEMPTION.—The Secretary shall exempt all class A 

22 commercial driver’s license holders who are custom 

23 harvesters, agricultural retailers, agricultural busi24 ness employees, agricultural cooperative employees, 

25 or agricultural producers from the requirement to 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 1288 IS

1 obtain a hazardous material endorsement under part 

2 383 of title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, while 

3 operating a service vehicle carrying diesel fuel in 

4 quantities of 3,785 liters (1,000 gallons) or less if 

5 the tank containing such fuel is clearly marked with 

6 a placard reading ‘Diesel Fuel’.’’. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
### MEMORANDUM OPINION

N o. 04

- 11

- 00014

- CV

STONEBROOK SNF, LLC d/b/a Stonebrook Manor at Broadway,

Appellant

v.

Trini GONZALES as Next Friend for Natividad Gonzalez, an Adult,

Appellee

From the 285th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2010CI10104

Honorable John D. Gabriel, Jr. , Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice

Delivered and Filed: July 13, 2011

DISMISSED

Appellant has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. The motion states the parties h ave

agreed that the costs of appeal shall be taxed again st the party who incurred them. The motion

contains a certificate of service to appellee, who has not opposed the motion. Therefore, we grant

the motion and dismiss the appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1(a). Costs of appeal are taxed against

the party who incurred them

. See id . 42.1(d).

PER CURIAM
No. 53236.

#### Julian R. Holzer et al. *v.*United States,

protests 143066-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

Case No. 6D23-943

Lower Tribunal No. 2021-CA-000747

_____________________________

RICHARD MAGNUSSEN,

Appellant, 

v.

CITY OF NAPLES,

Appellee.

_____________________________

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Collier County.

Lauren L. Brodie, Judge.

March 26, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

NARDELLA, BROWNLEE and GANNAM, JJ., concur.

Charles P. Brady, of Charles Brady Law, PLLC, Saint Petersburg, for Appellant.

Ralf Brookes and James Stokes, of the City Attorney’s Office, Naples, for Appellee.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING 

AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED
Exhibit
      32.1




Certification




Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


(Subsections
      (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63


of
      Title
      18, United States Code)




Pursuant
      to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), the
      undersigned officer of SonomaWest Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
      "Company"), does hereby certify that:




The
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 (the
      "Form 10-Q") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section
      13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
      the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.






Dated:
      November 14, 2006




/s/
      Walker R.
      Stapleton


Walker
      R.
      Stapleton, President, Chief


Executive
      Officer and Chief Financial Officer







A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      SonomaWest Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by SonomaWest Holdings, Inc.
      and
      furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsCurvilinear Displacement Transfer Functions for Deformed Shape Predictions of Curved Structures Using Distributed Surface StrainsCurvilinear Displacement Transfer Functions were formulated for deformed shape predictions of different curved structures using surface strains. The embedded curved beam (depth-wise cross section of a curved structure along a surface strain-sensing line) was discretized into multiple small domains, with domain junctures matching the strain-sensing stations. Thus, the surface strain distribution can be described with a piecewise linear or a piecewise nonlinear function. The discrete approach enabled piecewise integrations of a curvature-strain differential equation for the embedded curved beam to yield closed-form Curvilinear Displacement Transfer Functions, which are written in terms of embedded curved-beam geometrical parameters and surface strains. By inputting the surface strain data, the Curvilinear Displacement Transfer Functions can transform surface strains into deflections along each embedded curved beam for mapping out the overall structural deformed shapes. The finite-element method was used to analytically generate the surface strains of the curved beams. The deformed shape prediction accuracies were then determined by comparing the theoretical deflections with the finite-element-generated deflections, which were used as yardsticks. By introducing the correction factors in simple mathematical forms, the Curvilinear Displacement Transfer Functions can be quite accurate for shape predictions of different curved-beam structures ranging from limit case of straight beam up to semicircular curved beam.Document ID20180006739Acquisition SourceArmstrong Flight Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Publication (TP)AuthorsKo, William L.*(NASA Armstrong Flight Research Center Edwards, CA, United States)*Fleischer, Van Tran*(NASA Armstrong Flight Research Center Edwards, CA, United States)*Lung, Shun Fat*(Jacobs Technology, Inc. Edwards AFB, CA, United States)*Date AcquiredOctober 24, 2018Publication DateSeptember 1, 2018Subject CategoryStructural MechanicsReport/Patent NumberNASA/TP-2018-219692AFRC-E-DAA-TN46296Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NND08RR01BDistribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20180006739.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
Form S-3 (No. 333-83830) pertaining to the registration of 1,106,195 shares of
the Company's common stock and Forms S-8, the 1996 Equity Incentive Plan, and
1998-A Direct Hit Stock Plan (No. 333-33694), 1999 Equity Incentive Plan, as
Amended through May 25, 2000 and  1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, as Amended
through May 25, 2000 (No. 333-97405), Net Effect Systems, Inc. 1997 Stock Plan
(No. 333-95687), and 1999 Non-Qualified Equity Incentive Plan (No. 333-73400)
and in the related Prospectuses of Ask Jeeves, Inc. of our report  dated
January 22, 2003, with respect to the consolidated financial statements  and
financial statement schedule of Ask Jeeves, Inc. included in this Annual
Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2002.

                                            /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Walnut Creek, California
March 10, 2003
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 28 (Tuesday, February 11, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 8233]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-02920]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Fourth Meeting: RTCA Special Committee 228--Minimum Operational 
Performance Standards for Unmanned Aircraft Systems.

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), U.S. Department of 
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Notice of RTCA Special Committee 228--Minimum Operational 
Performance Standards for Unmanned Aircraft Systems.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of the 
fourth meeting of RTCA Special Committee 228--Minimum Operational 
Performance Standards for Unmanned Aircraft Systems.

DATES: The meeting will be held February 28, 2014 from 9:00 a.m. to 
5:00 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at RTCA, 1150 18th Street NW., 
Suite 910, Washington, DC 20036.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The RTCA Secretariat, 1150 18th Street 
NW., Suite 910, Washington, DC 20036, or by telephone at (202) 330-0662 
or (202) 833-9339, fax at (202) 833-9434, or Web site at http://www.rtca.org.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.), notice is 
hereby given for a meeting of RTCA Special Committee 228--Minimum 
Operational Performance Standards for Unmanned Aircraft Systems. The 
agenda will include the following:

Specific Working Group Sessions Before Plenary

February 25-27

    All Day, Working Group 1-DAA, MacIntosh-NBAA Room & Colson Board 
Room. All Day, Working Group 2-C2, ARINC & Hilton-A4A Rooms.

February 28

     Welcome/Introductions/Administrative Remarks/SC-228 
Participation Guidelines.
     Agenda Overview.
     Review/Approval of Minutes from Plenary 3 (RTCA 
Paper No. 007-14/SC228-011).
     Review of RTCA SC-228 Steering Committee Activity.
     SC-228 Terms of Reference--coordination with other SCs.
    [cir] Status of Discussions with SC-147.
     Report from WG-1 for Detect and Avoid progress on the DAA 
MOPS.
     Report from WG-2 for Command and Control progress on the 
C2 MOPS.
     Other Business.
     Date, Place and Time of Next Meeting.
     Adjourn.
    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in 
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may 
present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on February 5, 2014.
Paige L. Williams,
Management Analyst, Business Operations Group, ANG-A12, Federal 
Aviation Administration.
[FR Doc. 2014-02920 Filed 2-10-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 89 (Wednesday, May 9, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 26426]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-8824]



[[Page 26426]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-61,177]


Bartech Group, Inc., Including Workers of Continental Design and 
Engineering and Manpower, Anderson, IN; Notice of Termination of 
Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated on March 26, 2007 in response to a petition 
filed on behalf of workers of Bartech Group, Inc., including workers of 
Continental Design and Engineering and Manpower, Anderson, Indiana.
    The petitioning group of workers is covered by an active 
certification (TA-W-60,858 as amended) which expires on February 2, 
2009. Consequently, further investigation in this case would serve no 
purpose, and the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC this 2nd day of May 2007.
Richard Church,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E7-8824 Filed 5-8-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
69–008 

110TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 2d Session 110–719 

WAIVING A REQUIREMENT OF CLAUSE 6(a) OF RULE XIII 

WITH RESPECT TO CONSIDERATION OF CERTAIN RESOLUTIONS REPORTED FROM THE COMMITTEE ON RULES 

JUNE 18, 2008.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

Ms. SLAUGHTER, from the Committee on Rules, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany H. Res. 1281] 

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House 

Resolution 1281, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to the House 

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted. 

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution waives a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII 

with respect to consideration of any resolution reported on the legislative day of June 19, 2008, providing for consideration or disposition of a measure making supplemental appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2008. 

COMMITTEE VOTES

The results of each record vote on an amendment or motion to 

report, together with the names of those voting for and against, are 

printed below: 

Rules Committee record vote No. 542 

Date: June 18, 2008. 

Measure: H. Res. 1281, waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of 

rule XIII with respect to consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on Rules. 

Motion by: Mr. Dreier. 

Summary of motion: To add at the end a new section 2, which 

would stipulate that the provisions in section 1 shall not apply unless a letter, jointly signed by the Majority and Minority Leaders, 

verifies that the measure specified in section 1 is a bipartisan product. 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with HEARING
2 

Results: Defeated 4–8. 

Vote by Members: McGovern—Nay; Hastings (FL)—Nay; Matsui—Nay; Welch—Nay; Castor—Nay; Arcuri—Nay; Sutton—Nay; 

Dreier—Yea; Diaz-Balart—Yea; Hastings (WA)—Yea; Sessions— Yea; Slaughter—Nay. 

Æ 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with HEARING
<PAGE>

                                                           EXHIBIT 10.4


                                PROMISSORY NOTE

Date December 20, 2000

$**525,000.00**


    ON DEMAND, for value received Liquitek Enterprises, Inc. Promises to pay
to the order of Hydromaid International, Inc. at 1350 E. Draper Parkway,
Draper, Utah 84020 in the State of Utah, the sum of Five Hundred Twenty Five
Thousand Dollars, in lawful money of the United States of America, with
interest at the rate of 6.2 per cent per annum.

All due and payable on or before March 31, 2001. The sum due at the
aforementioned time is $533,982. (Five Hundred Thirty Three Thousand Nine
Hundred Eighty Two) Dollars.

Should suit be commenced to enforce payment of this note, Liquitek
Enterprises, Inc. promises to pay such additional sum as the court may adjudge
reasonable as attorney's fees in said suit.


Hydromaid International, Inc.          Liquitek Enterprises, Inc.

/s/ John W. Nagel                      /s/ Lester W.B. Moore
------------------------               -----------------------
By: John W. Nagel                      By: Lester W.B. Moore
    Chief Financial Officer                Chief Executive Officer
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Lassen National Forest,California, Mt. Diablo meridian**
 
2016 | 2017| 2018
 
SuDoc Number:A 13.36/2-9:L 33/
Item Number:0086-C-02 (online)
CGP systemNumber:001084842
 
November 13, 2018
NO. SCPW-12-0000473

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

 

IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION OF CHRIS GRINDING

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

ORDER

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, Duffy, and McKenna, JJ.)

Upon consideration of petitioner Chris Grindling’s

petition for an extraordinary writ filed on May 9, 2012, it

appears that petitioner fails to demonstrate a clear and

indisputable right to relief. Therefore, petitioner is not

entitled to extraordinary relief. See Kema v. Gaddis, 91 Hawai#i

200, 204, 982 P.2d 334, 338 (1999) (An extraordinary writ will

not issue unless the petitioner demonstrates a clear and

indisputable right to relief and a lack of alternative means to

redress adequately the alleged wrong or obtain the requested

action.). Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the clerk of the appellate

court shall process the petition for an extraordinary writ

without payment of the filing fee.

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCPW-12-0000473

17-MAY-2012

02:38 PM
2

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for an

extraordinary writ is denied.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, May 17, 2012.

 /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

 /s/ Paula A. Nakayama

 /s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr.

 /s/ James E. Duffy, Jr.

 /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
No. 56699.

protests 133739-K, etc, (New York).

#### P. R. Dreyer, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of cornmint oil the same in all material respects as that the *491subject of *A. Maschmeijer, Jr., Inc.*v. *United States*(39 C. C. P. A. 139, C. A. D. 476), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 279 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.Con.Res.279
                                              Agreed to January 22, 2008

                       One Hundred Tenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday,
            the third day of January, two thousand and eight

                          Concurrent Resolution

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That when the House adjourns on the legislative day of Wednesday, 
January 23, 2008, on a motion offered pursuant to this concurrent 
resolution by its Majority Leader or his designee, it stand adjourned 
until 2 p.m. on Monday, January 28, 2008, or until the time of any 
reassembly pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution, 
whichever occurs first; and that when the House adjourns on the 
legislative day of Tuesday, January 29, 2008, on a motion offered 
pursuant to this concurrent resolution by its Majority Leader or his 
designee, it stand adjourned until 2 p.m. on Wednesday, February 6, 
2008, or until the time of any reassembly pursuant to section 2 of this 
concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first.
    Sec. 2.  The Speaker or her designee, after consultation with the 
Minority Leader, shall notify the Members of the House to reassemble at 
such place and time as she may designate if, in her opinion, the public 
interest shall warrant it.
Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA Supreme Court No. DA 19

- 0492

____________________________________) PARK COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL ) COUNCIL and GREATER ) YELLOWSTONE COALITION, ) ) Plaintiff s and Appell ees , )

) GRANT OF UNOPPOSED v. ) MOTION FOR EXTENSION ) OFTIME MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF ) ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY and ) LUCKY MINERALS , INC., ) ) Defendants and Appell an ts, ) ) and ) ) TIM FOX, in his capacity as Attorney ) Generalof

th e STATE OF MONTANA ) ) Intervenor and Appellant

. ) ____________________________________) Pursuant to Rule 26(1), M.R.App.P. and for good cause appearing, the Department of Environmental Quality’s unopposed motion for an extension of time to file a supple me ntal brief on the issues identified in this Court’s Order issued on May 19, 2020 is **GRANTED**

. All parties shall file their respective supple me ntal briefs on or before July 10, 2020

. 06/03/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0492Electronically signed by: Laurie McKinnon Justice, Montana Supreme Court

June 3 2020
#### Bloomingdale Bros., Inc., et al. *v.*United States

No. 6453.

Entry No. 763013, etc.

Invoices dated Witham, England, April 10, 1941, etc.

Certified April 17, 1941, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y, May 19, 1941, etc.

(Decided October 24, 1946)

*John D. Rode*for the plaintiffs.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Hínchelos, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importers on entry because' of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.