Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 89 / Wednesday, May 9, 2007 / Notices 26423 

[FR Doc. E7–8822 Filed 5–8–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

Notice of Determinations Regarding 

Eligibility To Apply for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance and Alternative 

Trade Adjustment Assistance 

In accordance with Section 223 of the 

Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 

U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor 

herein presents summaries of 

determinations regarding eligibility to 

apply for trade adjustment assistance for 

workers (TA–W) number and alternative 

trade adjustment assistance (ATAA) by 

(TA–W) number issued during the 

period of April 16 through April 27, 

2007. 

In order for an affirmative 

determination to be made for workers of 

a primary firm and a certification issued 

regarding eligibility to apply for worker 

adjustment assistance, each of the group 

eligibility requirements of Section 

222(a) of the Act must be met. 

I. Section (a)(2)(A), all of the 

following must be satisfied: 

A. a significant number or proportion 

of the workers in such workers’ firm, or 

an appropriate subdivision of the firm, 

have become totally or partially 

separated, or are threatened to become 

totally or partially separated; 

B. the sales or production, or both, of 

such firm or subdivision have decreased 

absolutely; and 

C. increased imports of articles like or 

directly competitive with articles 

produced by such firm or subdivision 

have contributed importantly to such 

workers’ separation or threat of 

separation and to the decline in sales or 

production of such firm or subdivision; 

or 

II. Section (a)(2)(B), both of the 

following must be satisfied: 

A. a significant number or proportion 

of the workers in such workers’ firm, or 

an appropriate subdivision of the firm, 

have become totally or partially 

separated, or are threatened to become 

totally or partially separated; 

B. there has been a shift in production 

by such workers’ firm or subdivision to 

a foreign country of articles like or 

directly competitive with articles which 

are produced by such firm or 

subdivision; and 

C. One of the following must be 

satisfied: 

1. the country to which the workers’

firm has shifted production of the 

articles is a party to a free trade 

agreement with the United States; 

2. the country to which the workers’

firm has shifted production of the 

articles to a beneficiary country under 

the Andean Trade Preference Act, 

African Growth and Opportunity Act, or 

the Caribbean Basin Economic Recovery 

Act; or 

3. there has been or is likely to be an 

increase in imports of articles that are 

like or directly competitive with articles 

which are or were produced by such 

firm or subdivision. 

Also, in order for an affirmative 

determination to be made for 

secondarily affected workers of a firm 

and a certification issued regarding 

eligibility to apply for worker 

adjustment assistance, each of the group 

eligibility requirements of Section 

222(b) of the Act must be met. 

(1) significant number or proportion 

of the workers in the workers’ firm or 

an appropriate subdivision of the firm 

have become totally or partially 

separated, or are threatened to become 

totally or partially separated; 

(2) the workers’ firm (or subdivision) 

is a supplier or downstream producer to 

a firm (or subdivision) that employed a 

group of workers who received a 

certification of eligibility to apply for 

trade adjustment assistance benefits and 

such supply or production is related to 

the article that was the basis for such 

certification; and 

(3) either—

(A) the workers’ firm is a supplier and 

the component parts it supplied for the 

firm (or subdivision) described in 

paragraph (2) accounted for at least 20 

percent of the production or sales of the 

workers’ firm; or 

(B) a loss of business by the workers’

firm with the firm (or subdivision) 

described in paragraph (2) contributed 

importantly to the workers’ separation 

or threat of separation. 

In order for the Division of Trade 

Adjustment Assistance to issue a 

certification of eligibility to apply for 

Alternative Trade Adjustment 

Assistance (ATAA) for older workers, 

the group eligibility requirements of 

Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act 

must be met. 

1. Whether a significant number of 

workers in the workers’ firm are 50 

years of age or older. 

2. Whether the workers in the 

workers’ firm possess skills that are not 

easily transferable. 

3. The competitive conditions within 

the workers’ industry (i.e., conditions 

within the industry are adverse). 

Affirmative Determinations for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The date following the company 

name and location of each 

determination references the impact 

date for all workers of such 

determination. 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of Section 

222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of the 

Trade Act have been met. 

TA–W–61,126; U.S. Axle, Inc., On-Site 

Leased Workers of Volt Services 

Group, Pottstown, PA: March 5, 

2006 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of Section 

222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production) of the 

Trade Act have been met. 

TA–W–61,212; Motorcar Parts of 

America, Inc., Perfecto Staffing, 

Team, Priority, Accountemps, City, 

Torrance, CA: March 27, 2006 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of Section 

222(b) (supplier to a firm whose workers 

are certified eligible to apply for TAA) 

of the Trade Act have been met. 

NONE 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of Section 

222(b) (downstream producer for a firm 

whose workers are certified eligible to 

apply for TAA based on increased 

imports from or a shift in production to 

Mexico or Canada) of the Trade Act 

have been met. 

NONE 

Affirmative Determinations for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance and Alternative 

Trade Adjustment Assistance 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The date following the company 

name and location of each 

determination references the impact 

date for all workers of such 

determination. 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of Section 

222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) and 

Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act 

have been met. 

TA–W–60,946; Safer Pigment 

Corporation, A Subsidiary of Safer 

Holding Corp., Newark, NJ: 

February 7, 2006 

TA–W–60,946A; Safer Textiles 

Processing Corporation, A 

Subsidiary of Safer Holding Corp., 

Newark, NJ: February 7, 2006 

TA–W–60,946B; Safer Paper and 

Transfer Printing Corporation, A 

Subsidiary of Safer Holding Corp., 

Newark, NJ: February 7, 2006 

TA–W–60,999; Dispatch Printing 

Company, Columbus Dispatch 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
26424 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 89 / Wednesday, May 9, 2007 / Notices 

Division (The), Columbus, OH: 

February 5, 2006 

TA–W–61,041; Collins & Aikman, Port 

Huron Operations Division, Port 

Huron, MI: February 27, 2006 

TA–W–61,100; Performance Sports 

Apparel, Inc., Reading, PA: March 

12, 2006 

TA–W–61,133; Foundation Works, Inc., 

Cottage Grove, OR: March 14, 2006 

TA–W–61,143; Van Dorn Demag Corp, 

Demag Plastics Group (Formerly 

Van Dorn Service Corp.), 

Strongville, OH: March 9, 2006 

TA–W–60,975; Elliss Technologies LLC, 

Sterling Heights, MI: February 14, 

2006 

TA–W–60,977; Ward Manufacturing, 

Inc., Blossburg, PA: February 14, 

2006 

TA–W–61,022; Mid Continent Nail 

Corporation, A Subsidiary of Libla 

Industries, Inc., Radford, VA: 

February 23, 2006 

TA–W–61,065; Freight Car America, A 

Subsidiary of Johnstown America, 

Johnstown, PA: March 5, 2006 

TA–W–61,068; Microfibers, Inc, 

Pawtucket Division, Pawtucket, RI: 

March 5, 2006 

TA–W–61,072; Jefferson City 

Manufacturing, Inc., Jefferson City, 

MO: March 6, 2006 

TA–W–61,107; Boise Cascade LLC, 

Paper Division,Vancouver, WA: 

March 12, 2006 

TA–W–61,112; Modine Manufacturing 

Company, Automotive Division, 

Clinton, TN: March 13, 2006 

TA–W–61,119; Northcutt Woodworks, 

L.P., Crockett, TX: March 13, 2006 

TA–W–61,124; Top-Flite Golf Co. (The), 

Callaway Golf, Johnson & Hill, 

Reliable & Career, Chicopee, MA: 

October 26, 2006 

TA–W–61,132; John Dusenbery 

Company, Inc., Randolph, NJ: 

March 16, 2006 

TA–W–61,154; Quaker Narrow Fabrics, 

Milton, PA: March 19, 2006 

TA–W–61,171; Athol Manufacturing 

Co., A Division of Sandusky Athol 

International, Butner, NC: March 

22, 2006 

TA–W–61,191; Collins & Aikman 

Products Co, Fabrics Division, 

Roxboro, NC: March 23, 2006 

TA–W–61,216; Broyhill Furniture 

Industries, Inc., Pacemaker 

Furniture Company, Lenior, NC: 

December 23, 2006 

TA–W–61,283; IBM Corporation, 

Workers On-Site at Dana 

Corporation, Seating Products, 

Fulton, KY: April 10, 2006 

TA–W–61,222; Good Companion Sewing 

Co., San Francisco, CA: March 30, 

2006 

TA–W–61,302; TDS/US Automotive, A 

Subsidiary of TDS Logistics, 

Chesapeake, VA: March 28, 2006 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of Section 

222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production) and 

Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act 

have been met. 

TA–W–60,866; Wolverine World Wide, 

Rockford, MI: January 29, 2006 

TA–W–61,091; Esselte Corporation, 

Leased Workers of People Link 

Staffing and Trillum Staffing, 

Kankakee, IL: March 9, 2006 

TA–W–61,113; Jabil Circuit, Inc., 

Including Workers of the Cisco 

Systems, Q-Logic Assembly Lines, 

St. Petersburg, FL: March 13, 2006 

TA–W–61,117; Hanes Brands, Inc., 

Formerly Sara Lee Branded 

Apparel, Rockingham Plant 

Division, Rockingham, NC: 

February 28, 2006 

TA–W–61,145; Enhanced 

Manufacturing Solutions LLC, 

Amherst Injection Molding Div., 

SPS Temporary, Amherst, NY: 

February 28, 2006 

TA–W–61,157; Visteon Systems LLC, 

Climate Control Div./Evaporators, 

Connersville, IN: March 19, 2006 

TA–W–61,157A; Visteon Systems LLC, 

Climate Control Div./Radiator/Heat 

Exchange, Connersville, IN: March 

19, 2006 

TA–W–61,165; Carhartt Inc Autopocket 

Facility, Autopocket (Sewing) 

Facility, Madisonville, KY: August 

3, 2006 

TA–W–61,166; Carhartt Inc, Providence 

(Sewing) Facility, Providence, KY: 

March 21, 2006 

TA–W–61,192; Arrow Electronics, Inc., 

Leased Workers of Adecco, Lenexa, 

KS: March 23, 2006 

TA–W–61,218; Hanesbrands, Inc., 

Winston-Salem, NC: March 29, 2006 

TA–W–61,263; Parker Hannifin 

Corporation, Powertrain Division, 

Leased Workers of Manpower Temp 

Services, Iron Gate, VA: April 5, 

2006 

TA–W–61,264; Sanmina Sci USA, Inc., 

Backplanes Division, Woburn, MA: 

April 6, 2006 

TA–W–61,314; Tridon, Smyrna, TN: 

March 19, 2006 

TA–W–61,001; Optera Colorado, Inc., A 

Subsidiary of Magna Donnelly, 

Longmont, CO: February 16, 2006 

TA–W–61,054; Corsair Marine, Inc., 

Chula Vista, CA: February 28, 2006 

TA–W–61,127; ICT, Inc., Calvert City, 

KY: March 15, 2006 

TA–W–61,140; Konica Minolta Graphic 

Imaging, Glen Cove, NY: March 12, 

2006 

TA–W–61,167; Photronics, Inc., Allen, 

TX: March 13, 2006 

TA–W–61,187; PointCare Corporation, 

Subsidiary of Biocare Corporation, 

San Jose, CA: March 16, 2006 

TA–W–61,201; Photronics, Inc., 

Brookfield, CT: March 23, 2006 

TA–W–61,258; Springs Global US, Inc., 

Formerly Springs Industries, Grace 

Complex, Lancaster, SC: May 3, 

2007 

TA–W–61,259; Amtek Gears, Inc., 

Subsidiary of Amtek Auto Limited, 

Bay City, MI: April 5, 2006 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of Section 

222(b) (supplier to a firm whose workers 

are certified eligible to apply for TAA) 

and Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade 

Act have been met. 

TA–W–61,094; Pine River Plastics Inc., 

St. Clair, MI: March 9, 2006 

TA–W–61,220; Silberline Mfg. Company, 

Inc., Decatur, IN Division, Decatur, 

IN: March 28, 2006 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of Section 

222(b) (downstream producer for a firm 

whose workers are certified eligible to 

apply for TAA based on increased 

imports from or a shift in production to 

Mexico or Canada) and Section 

246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act have 

been met. 

NONE 

Negative Determinations for Alternative 

Trade Adjustment Assistance 

In the following cases, it has been 

determined that the requirements of 

246(a)(3)(A)(ii) have not been met for 

the reasons specified. 

The Department has determined that 

criterion (1) of Section 246 has not been 

met. Workers at the firm are 50 years of 

age or older. 

NONE 

The Department has determined that 

criterion (2) of Section 246 has not been 

met. Workers at the firm possess skills 

that are easily transferable. 

TA–W–61,126; U.S. Axle, Inc., On-Site 

Leased Workers of Volt Services 

Group, Pottstown, PA 

TA–W–61,212; Motorcar Parts of 

America, Inc., Perfecto Staffing, 

Team, Priority, Accountemps, City, 

Torrance, CA: 

The Department has determined that 

criterion (3) of Section 246 has not been 

met. Competition conditions within the 

workers’ industry are not adverse. 

NONE 

Negative Determinations for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance and Alternative 

Trade Adjustment Assistance 

In the following cases, the 

investigation revealed that the eligibility 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 89 / Wednesday, May 9, 2007 / Notices 26425 

criteria for worker adjustment assistance 

have not been met for the reasons 

specified. 

Because the workers of the firm are 

not eligible to apply for TAA, the 

workers cannot be certified eligible for 

ATAA. 

The investigation revealed that 

criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.A.) and (a)(2)(B)(II.A.) 

(employment decline) have not been 

met. 

TA–W–61,142; Alcatel Lucent, System 

Integration Center, Columbus, OH. 

The investigation revealed that 

criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.B.) (Sales or 

production, or both, did not decline) 

and (a)(2)(B)(II.B.) (shift in production 

to a foreign country) have not been met. 

TA–W–60,800; Volvo Trucks North 

America, A Division of Volvo Group 

North America, New River Valley 

Assembly Plant, Dublin, VA. 

The investigation revealed that 

criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.C.) (increased 

imports) and (a)(2)(B)(II.B.) (shift in 

production to a foreign country) have 

not been met. 

TA–W–60,662; Irving Forest Products, 

Pinkham Sawmill Division, 

Ashland, ME. 

TA–W–60,942; Weyerhaeuser Company, 

Bauman Lumber—Sawmill 

Division, Lebanon, OR. 

TA–W–61,053; Nypro Kentucky, Hazard 

Division, Hazard, KY. 

TA–W–61,057; Bobcat Company, 

Gwinner, ND. 

TA–W–61,078; U.S. Traffic Corporation, 

A Quixote Company, Santa Fe 

Spring, CA. 

TA–W–61,110; Dent Manufacturing, 

Inc., Northampton, PA. 

TA–W–61,157B; Visteon Systems LLC, 

Climate Control Div./Modules, 

Connersville, IN. 

TA–W–61,175; Beard Hosiery, Inc., 

Lenior, NC. 

TA–W–61,179; Rebtex Inc., 

Sommerville, NJ. 

TA–W–60,905; General Motors 

Corporation, GMVM Division, 

Janesville, WI. 

TA–W–61,074; Fleetwood Travel 

Trailers of Kentucky, Inc., Travel 

Trailer Division, Campbellsville, 

KY. 

TA–W–61,122; Snap-On Logistics 

Company, Division of Snap-On 

Tools Co. LLC, Industrial/ 

Diagnostics Mfg., JohnsonCity, TN. 

TA–W–61,180; Welex Incorporated, Blue 

Bell, PA. 

The investigation revealed that the 

predominate cause of worker 

separations is unrelated to criteria 

(a)(2)(A)(I.C.) (increased imports) and 

(a)(2)(B)(II.C) (shift in production to a 

foreign country under a free trade 

agreement or a beneficiary country 

under a preferential trade agreement, or 

there has been or is likely to be an 

increase in imports). 

TA–W–61,308; Allied Air Enterprises, 

Bellevue, OH. 

The workers’ firm does not produce 

an article as required for certification 

under Section 222 of the Trade Act of 

1974. 

TA–W–61,032; Baker Furniture, Grand 

Rapids, MI. 

TA–W–61,153; Lenovo, Americas Sales 

Operations, Research Triangle Park, 

NC. 

TA–W–61,178; Owens-Illinois, Hayward, 

CA. 

TA–W–61,190; Entronix, Rogers, MN. 

TA–W–61,190A; Entronix, Eveleth, MN. 

TA–W–61,202; Glenoit LLC/Ex-Cell 

Home Fashion, Inc., Goldsboro, NC. 

TA–W–61,255; Unisys Corporation, 

Technology Management Center, 

Blue Bell, PA. 

TA–W–61,266; Mortgage Guaranty 

Insurance Corporation, Concord, 

CA. 

TA–W–61,272; U.S. Borax, Rio Tinto 

Minerals, Valencia, CA. 

The investigation revealed that 

criteria of Section 222(b)(2) has not been 

met. The workers’ firm (or subdivision) 

is not a supplier to or a downstream 

producer for a firm whose workers were 

certified eligible to apply for TAA. 

TA–W–61,012; Avantech 

Manufacturing, LLC, Formerly 

Known as Intier Automotive 

Interiors of America, Mt. 

Pleasant,TN. 

I hereby certify that the aforementioned 

determinations were issued during the period 

of April 16 through April 27, 2007. Copies of 

these determinations are available for 

inspection in Room C–5311, U.S. Department 

of Labor, 200Constitution Avenue, NW., 

Washington, DC 20210 during normal 

business hours or will be mailed to persons 

who write to the above address. 

Dated: May 3, 2007. 

Ralph DiBattista, 

Director, Division of Trade Adjustment 

Assistance. 

[FR Doc. E7–8821 Filed 5–8–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

[TA–W–60,876B] 

Armstrong Wood Products, Inc., 

Armstrong Hardwood Flooring 

Company, Pattern Plus Flooring 

Department; Oneida, TN; Notice of 

Affirmative DeterminationRegarding 

Application for Reconsideration 

On April 13, 2007, the U.S. 

Department of Labor (Department) 

received a request for administrative 

reconsideration of the Department’s 

Notice of Negative Determination 

Regarding Eligibility to Apply for 

Worker Adjustment Assistance, 

applicable to workers and former 

workers of the subject firm. The 

negative determination was issued on 

March 28, 2007. The Department’s 

Notice of determination was published 

in the Federal Register on April 10, 

2007 (72 FR 17937). 

The negative determination was based 

on the Department’s findings that, 

during the relevant period, the subject 

firm did not import pattern plus 

flooring, the subject firm did not shift 

production of pattern plus flooring 

overseas, and the subject firm’s 

customers did not import pattern plus 

flooring. 

In the request for reconsideration, the 

workers alleged that the subject firm 

imported pattern plus flooring and 

provided a copy of a shipping label for 

hardwood flooring made in China 

which was, allegedly, received by the 

subject firm. 

The Department has carefully 

reviewed the workers’ request for 

reconsideration and has determined that 

the Department will conduct further 

investigation. 

Conclusion 

After careful review of the 

application, I conclude that the claim is 

of sufficient weight to justify 

reconsideration of the U.S. Department 

of Labor’s prior decision. The 

application is, therefore, granted. 

Signed at Washington, DC, this 2nd day of 

May 2007. 

Elliott S. Kushner, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade 

Adjustment Assistance. 

[FR Doc. E7–8827 Filed 5–8–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES