alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

Summary of Guaranty Contract of Maximum Amount ( the Contract) Entered into by and between Shenzhen BAK Battery Co., Ltd, Xiangqian Li
(the Guarantor) and Tianjin Branch, Bank of Dalian (the Creditor) on
October 27, 2010

Main contents:

- Guaranty Contract number: DLQ Jin201010270014;
- Shenzhen BAK Battery Co., Ltd and Xiangqian Li undertake to assume joint and
- several liabilities for BAK International (Tianjin) Limited (the Obligor)s indebtedness towards Bank of Dalian from October 27, 2010 to January 26, 2012, and the maximum amount secured is RMB 50 million.
- Guaranty Responsibility: The
guaranty under this Contract shall be guaranty with joint and several
liabilities. The guarantor is obligated to pay off the debt in the event the
obligor is unable to pay off the debt (including the creditor declares the debt
becomes mature in advance to its original expiry date due to default of the
obligor or the guarantor).
- Scope of Guaranty:The guaranty shall cover all of the loan principal, interest, penalty interest,
breach of contract compensation, damages, undertaking fee and all the expenses such as litigation cost, lawyers fee, notification cost and public notice cost etc. which is incurred to the Creditor in realizing its creditors right.
- Guaranty period: The guaranty period is from the effective date of this Contract to two years after the expiry of the term of the Credit Facility Agreement and relevant agreement entered into under the Credit Facility Agreement.

Headlines of the articles omitted:

- Termination and explanation
- Payment on demand
- Declaration and undertaking of the Guarantor
- Obligations of the Guarantor
- Continuity of guaranty
- Amendment and explanation of the Contract
- Disputation settlement
- Validity
- Supplement articles

---
No. 53229.

#### Bell & Howell Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 50813-K/90097, etc. (Chicago).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
(Reap. Dec. 9836)

#### Teller Importing Co. et al. *v.*United States

Entry No. 805300, etc.

(Decided November 9, 1960)

*Siegel, Man&ell & Davidson*for the plaintiffs.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

OliveR, Chief Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement enumerated in schedule “A,” hereto attached and made a part hereof, are before me for decision on a written stipulation, reading as follows:

> *551IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between tbe parties hereto, subject to tbe approval of tbe Court, that tbe merchandise and tbe issues in tbe Appeals to Reappraisement listed in tbe Schedule attached hereto and made a part hereof are tbe same in all material respects as tbe merchandise and the issues decided in tbe case of *Paramount Import Co., Inc. et al.*v. *United States,*Reap. Dec. 9697, and that tbe record in said ease be incorporated and made a part of tbe record herein.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the appraised values of tbe merchandise covered by the Appeals to Reappraisements enumerated herein, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the Appraiser in similar eases, is equal to the market value or the price at the time of exportation of such merchandise to the United States, at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States, and that there was no higher foreign value for such or similar merchandise.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the cases may be submitted on the foregoing stipulation.

In the incorporated case, I Reid that a charge of 15 per centum paid by the American importer to a foreign commissionaire for services rendered in connection with the purchase of merchandise in the foreign market was a *tona fide*buying commission, and, as such, did not enter into the dutiable value of the merchandise.

On the agreed set of facts embodied in the stipulation of submission herein, and following my cited decision on the law, I find that the proper basis for appraisement of the merchandise in question is export value, as defined in section 402(d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, and hold chat such statutory value therefor is the appraised values, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
No. 46985.

#### Protests 932023-G, etc., of I. Magnin & Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

The evidence established that certain of the items consist of woven silk mufflers, hemmed and block-printed by hand. It was therefore held that those imported prior to the effective date of the British Trade Agreement (T. D. 49753) are dutiable at 60 percent under paragraph 1209 and those imported subsequent to the said date are dutiable at 35 percent under paragraph 1209 and T. D. 49753. The protests were sustained to that extent.
#### F. W. Woolworth Co. *v.*United States

No. 6115.

Invoices dated Sonneberg, Germany, January 11, 1939, etc.

Certified January 18, 1939.

Entered at Baltimore, Md., February 13, 1939.

Entry No. 2897/1.

(Decided March 12, 1945)

*Sharretts & Hillis (Edward P. Sharretts*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General *(Daniel I. Auster,*special attorney), for the defendant.

OlxveR, Presiding Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulatioh of counsel for the parties hereto:

> It is hereby stipulated by and between counsel for the respective parties hereto, subject to the approval of the court, that the facts and circumstances relating to the item of 10 per centum commission in the case listed in the annexed schedule, identified on the invoice with “xx” in green ink and the initials CHR of Examiner Charles H. Ritz, are in all material respectó the same as the facts and circumstances relating to the item of 10 per centum commission specified in the invoices relating to glass tree ornaments, novelties, and figures covered by reappraise-ments 113038-A, 113040-A, and 113468-A of the F. W. Woolworth Co. and passed upon by the United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals in *United States*v. *S. S. Kresge Co., B. Shackman & Co., Rice & Co. Corp., Strauss-Eckardt Co., Inc., F. W. Woolworth Co.,*26 C. C. P. A. 349, 352, wherein the court held that “A purchasing commission, charged for the handling of merchandise, is not a proper part of dutiable value.”

> *363It is further stipulated and agreed that on the' date of exportation of the merchandise involved in the case listed in the annexed schedule, identified on the invoices with “xx” in green ink and the initials CHR of Examiner Charles II. Ritz, articles such and similar thereto were freely offered for sale and sold to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country of exportation in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade for exportation to the United States at the *per se*unit invoice prices, plus 3J4 per centum social assessments for insurance, vacation, and holiday costs, plus packing, as invoic'ed, and that there was no higher foreign value.

> As to all other items, the appeal is abandoned.

> It is further stipulated and agreed that the record in *United States*v. *S. S. Kresge Co. et al.,*26 C. C. P. A. 349, 352, be incorporated herein and that the said appeal to reappraisement -is submitted on this stipulation.

On the agreed'facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise represented on the invoice by the items marked “xx” in green ink and the initials CHR of Examiner Charles H. Ritz, and that such values are the *per se*unit invoice prices, plus *3%*per centum, social assessments for insurance, vacation, and holiday costs, plus packing, as invoiced.

The appeal having been abandoned insofar as it relates to all other merchandise, to that extént the appeal is hereby dismissed.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 310 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Whereas Harriet Ross Tubman was born into slavery in 

Bucktown, Maryland, in or around 1820; 

Whereas in 1849 she escaped to Philadelphia and became a 

‘‘conductor’’ on the Underground Railroad; 

Whereas she was commonly referred to as ‘‘Moses’’ due to 

her courage and sacrifice in leading many 
2 

•HCON 310 EH 

enslaved persons out of bondage into freedom, endeavoring despite great hardship and danger of being reenslaved; 

Whereas Harriet Ross Tubman became an eloquent and effective speaker on behalf of the movement to abolish slavery; 

Whereas during the Civil War, Harriet Ross Tubman assisted 

the Union Army as a cook, nurse, scout, spy, and became 

the first woman to lead an armed expedition in the war, 

leading to the liberation of more than seven hundred 

slaves; 

Whereas after the Civil War, she became active in the women’s suffrage movement and continued to fight for human 

dignity, human rights, opportunity, and justice; 

Whereas in 1896, Harriet Ross Tubman purchased 25 acres 

of land in Auburn, New York, to create a home and hospital for indigent, aged, and sick African-Americans, 

which opened on June 23, 1908, as the Harriet Tubman 

Home for the Sick and Aged, becoming the only charity 

outside of New York City dedicated to the shelter and 

care of African-Americans in New York; 

Whereas in 1944 the United States Maritime Commission 

launched the SS Harriet Tubman (Hull Number 3032), 

the first Liberty ship ever named for an African-American woman; 

Whereas in 1978, Harriet Ross Tubman was the first honoree in the United States Postal Service Black Heritage 

Stamp Series; 

Whereas the Episcopal Church has designated Harriet Ross 

Tubman a saint in its Book of Common Prayer; 
3 

•HCON 310 EH 

Whereas Harriet Ross Tubman, whose courageous and dedicated pursuit of the promise of American ideals and common principles of humanity continues to serve and inspire 

all people who cherish freedom, died at her home in Auburn, New York, on March 10, 1913; 

Whereas March 10, 1990, was designated as Harriet Ross 

Tubman Day and States such as Delaware, Georgia, 

Maryland, New York, and Texas host annual celebrations 

that honor the life of Harriet Tubman; and 

Whereas we support honoring the contributions of Harriet 

Ross Tubman annually on March 10: Now, therefore, be 

it 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That the Congress— 

3 (1) supports the designation of a national day 

4 of remembrance for Harriet Ross Tubman; and 

5 (2) encourages the people of the United States 

6 to support and participate in appropriate cere7 monies, programs, and other activities to commemo8 rate a national day of remembrance for Harriet Ross 

9 Tubman. 

Passed the House of Representatives April 1, 2008. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 310 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

remembrance for Harriet Ross Tubman. 

Expressing support for a national day of
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 377 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.Con.Res.377
                                                 Agreed to June 27, 2008

                       One Hundred Tenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday,
            the third day of January, two thousand and eight

                          Concurrent Resolution

Whereas African American men and women have served with distinction, 
  courage, and honor in the United States Armed Forces throughout the 
  history of the nation, even when they were denied the basic 
  constitutional freedoms promised to all citizens;

Whereas the practice of racial segregation and discrimination in the 
  military prevented African Americans from receiving the full 
  recognition to which they were entitled as a result of their service;

Whereas African Americans, in leading the effort to protest 
  discriminatory treatment in the armed forces, paved the way for 
  successful integration of women, Asians, Hispanics, and other ethnic 
  minorities;

Whereas the dedicated and heroic service of African American men and 
  women during World War II led to President Truman's historic 
  executive order 60 years ago that marked the beginning of racial 
  integration in the United States Armed Forces;

Whereas as a result of President Truman's action, the United States 
  Armed Forces has become one of the nation's best examples of an 
  institution committed to equality, opportunity, and advancement based 
  on merit rather than race, religion, or ethnicity; and

Whereas the heroic contributions of each member of the United States 
  Armed Forces should be honored and celebrated: Now, therefore, be it

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. USE OF ROTUNDA FOR CEREMONY COMMEMORATING 60TH ANNIVERSARY 
              OF INTEGRATION OF THE ARMED FORCES.

    (a) Use of Rotunda.--The rotunda of the Capitol is authorized to be 
used on July 23, 2008, for a ceremony commemorating the 60th 
anniversary of President Truman's Executive Order No. 9981, which 
states, ``It is hereby declared to be the policy of the President that 
there shall be equality of treatment and opportunity for all persons in 
the armed services without regard to race, color, religion or national 
origin.''.
    (b) Preparations.--Physical preparations for the ceremony referred 
to in subsection (a) shall be carried out in accordance with such 
conditions as the Architect of the Capitol may prescribe.
Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.
```
Before the Second Division,

May 2, 1950

No. 54298.

#### W. T. Grant Company *v.*United States,

protest 545816-G (Boston).

Opinion by

Rao, J.

The protest was dismissed.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 88 (Tuesday, May 8, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26085-26086]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-8788]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

 Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy


Energy Efficiency Building Technology Application Centers

AGENCY: Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Department of 
Energy.

ACTION: Program notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Energy Technology Laboratory, on behalf of the 
Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy's Building

[[Page 26086]]

Technologies Program, intends to issue a Funding Opportunity 
Announcement (FOA) to select and fund Energy-Efficient Building 
Technology Application Centers. This FOA is expected to be issued on or 
about May 15, 2007. The goal of this funding opportunity is to 
establish geographically and climatically diverse Energy-Efficient 
Building Technology Application Centers. This goal supports the EERE 
Strategic Plan to increase the energy efficiency of the Nation's 
buildings and the Building Technology Program's Technology Validation 
and Market Introduction activity goal of accelerating the widespread 
market adoption of energy-efficient building technologies and 
practices. It also encourages demonstration and commercial application 
of advanced energy methods and technologies through education and 
outreach to building and industry professionals, and other individuals 
and organizations with an interest in efficient energy use.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: James Rannels, U.S. Department of 
Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Program 
Office EE-2J, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20585-0121, 
(202) 586-8070, E-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#db91bab6bea8f589bab5b5beb7a89bbebef5bfb4bef5bcb4ad"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d69cb7bbb3a5f884b7b8b8b3baa596b3b3f8b2b9b3f8b1b9a0">[email protected]</span></a>.
    C. Edward Christy, National Energy Technology Laboratory, 3610 
Collins Ferry Road, M/S E-02, Morgantown, WV 26507, (304) 285-4604, E-
mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c580a1a1aca0eb86adb7acb6b1bc85aba0b1a9eba1aaa0eba2aab3"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="aeebcacac7cb80edc6dcc7dddad7eec0cbdac280cac1cb80c9c1d8">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: May 2, 2007.
C. Edward Christy,
Director, Building and Industrial Technologies Division.
 [FR Doc. E7-8788 Filed 5-7-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 378 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.Con.Res.378
                                               Agreed to October 2, 2008

                       One Hundred Tenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday,
            the third day of January, two thousand and eight

                          Concurrent Resolution

Whereas the Wyoming Territorial Legislature passed, and Governor John 
  A. Campbell signed into law on December 10, 1869, a measure stating, 
  ``That every woman of the age of twenty-one years, residing in this 
  territory, may, at every election, to be holden under the law 
  thereof, cast her vote.'';

Whereas this Suffrage Act granted women in the Wyoming Territory the 
  right to vote with full civil and judicial equality to men;

Whereas Louisa Swain, on September 6, 1870, became the Nation's first 
  woman voter under laws guaranteeing absolute political equality to 
  women;

Whereas she cast that vote as a 70 year-old woman in the town of 
  Laramie's municipal election;

Whereas, the Laramie Daily Sentinel wrote, ``It is comforting to note 
  that our first woman voter was really a lady . . . of the highest 
  social standing in the community, universally beloved and respected. 
  The scene was in the highest degree interesting and impressive. There 
  was too much good sense in our community for any jeers or sneers to 
  be seen on such an occasion'';

Whereas this vote was inspirational to the women's suffrage movement 
  and to the cause of civil rights;

Whereas, Wyoming's statehood, in 1890, brought the codification of this 
  suffrage right through the ratification of the new Wyoming State 
  constitution under Article 6, section 1;

Whereas, when the Congress threatened to withhold statehood from 
  Wyoming, territory legislators replied with a telegram stating that 
  Wyoming would remain out of the Union 100 years rather than join 
  without women's suffrage;

Whereas President Benjamin Harrison, on July 10, 1890, signed into law 
  a bill admitting Wyoming into the Union, and recognizing it as the 
  Nation's ``Equality State'';

Whereas these actions instigated a path to the passage of the 19th 
  Amendment to the United States Constitution 50 years after Louisa 
  Swain's historical first vote; and

Whereas September 6, 2008, would be an appropriate date to designate as 
  Louisa Swain Day: Now, therefore, be it

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That Congress supports the designation of a Louisa Swain Day.
Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.
```
#### Knize, Inc., et al. *v.*United States

No. 6461.

Entry No. 746049, etc.

Invoices dated London, England, January 24, 1946, etc.

Certified January 24, 1946, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., March 18, 1946, etc.

(Decided October 24, 1946)

*Strauss & Hedges (Hadley S. King*of counsel) for the plaintiffs.

*Paul P. Bao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Molmson, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importers on entry because of :advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.