alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                           <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 3-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      MAR-31-1995             MAR-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                           DEC-31-1995             DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                     273,905                 273,905
<SECURITIES>                                 8,677                   8,677
<RECEIVABLES>                            2,461,773               2,461,773
<ALLOWANCES>                                30,360                  30,360
<INVENTORY>                              4,765,102               4,765,102
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         7,987,759               7,987,759
<PP&E>                                   2,811,829               2,811,829
<DEPRECIATION>                             783,484                 783,484
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          13,715,759              13,715,759
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    5,067,450               5,067,450
<BONDS>                                          0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                      0                       0
<COMMON>                                    32,456                  32,456
<OTHER-SE>                               7,334,688               7,334,688
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            13,715,759              13,715,759
<SALES>                                  5,317,826              15,275,355
<STOTAL-REVENUES>                        5,317,826              15,275,355
<CGS>                                    4,087,389              12,634,997
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            4,087,389              12,634,997
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                         1,033,061               2,871,891
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         141,316                 399,713
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             50,593                (407,587)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         50,593                (407,587)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0                       0
<CHANGES>                                        0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                50,593                (407,587)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .02                    (.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .02                    (.13)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to  18 U.S.C. Section 1350,  As Adopted Pursuant to  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Inovio Biomedical Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year
ending December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below,
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



|               |  |                                                                                                    
|-------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|March 31, 2009 |  | /s/ AVTAR DHILLON Avtar Dhillon President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
|               |  | /s/ PETER KIES Peter Kies Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)     

---



QuickLinks
**EXHIBIT 21.1**

**LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES**

**United States Subsidiaries:**

CardioDynamics International Corporation, a Delaware subsidiary 

LumenVu, Inc., a Delaware subsidiary 

Kesa Inc., a Delaware subsidiary 

VisualSonics Corporation, a Delaware subsidiary 

**Foreign Subsidiaries:**

ABC 123 Ltd, a Hong Kong subsidiary 

Medis Medizinische Messtechnik GmbH, a German subsidiary 

SonoSite, Ltd., a United Kingdom subsidiary 

SonoSite France SARL, a Frenchsubsidiary 

SonoSite GmbH, a German subsidiary 

SonoSite Iberica, S.L., a Spanish subsidiary 

SonoSite Italy S.r.l, an Italiansubsidiary 

SonoSite (Asia) Limited, a Hong Kong subsidiary 

SonoSite Japan KK, a Japanese subsidiary 

SonoSite Australasia Pty Limited, an Australian subsidiary 

SonoSite Canada, Inc.,a Canadian subsidiary 

SonoSite China Medical Ltd., a Hong Kong subsidiary 

SonoSite Limited, a Hong Kong subsidiary 

Sonosite (Shanghai) Co. Ltd., a Chinese subsidiary 

SonoSite Singapore Pte. Ltd.,a Singapore subsidiary 

SonoSite India Pte Limited, an Indian subsidiary 

VisualSonics, Inc., a Canadian subsidiary 

VisualSonics BV, a Netherlands subsidiary 

VisualSonics SARL, a French subsidiary
### Ground water in the North Side Pumping Division, Minidoka Project, Minidoka County, Idaho

By: Emerson G. CrosthwaiteR. C. Scott

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/cir371

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 149 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 149

   To extend expiring provisions of the USA PATRIOT Improvement and 
  Reauthorization Act of 2005, the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism 
   Prevention Act of 2004, and the FISA Amendments Act of 2008 until 
               December 31, 2013, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             January 25 (legislative day, January 5), 2011

Mr. Reid (for Mrs. Feinstein) introduced the following bill; which was 
       read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To extend expiring provisions of the USA PATRIOT Improvement and 
  Reauthorization Act of 2005, the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism 
   Prevention Act of 2004, and the FISA Amendments Act of 2008 until 
               December 31, 2013, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``FISA Sunsets Extension Act of 
2011''.

SEC. 2. SUNSET EXTENSIONS.

    (a) USA PATRIOT Improvement and Reauthorization Act of 2005.--
Section 102(b)(1) of the USA PATRIOT Improvement and Reauthorization 
Act of 2005 (Public Law 109-177; 50 U.S.C. 1805 note, 50 U.S.C. 1861 
note, and 50 U.S.C. 1862 note) is amended by striking ``February 28, 
2011'' and inserting ``December 31, 2013''.
    (b) Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004.--
Section 6001(b)(1) of the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention 
Act of 2004 (Public Law 108-458; 50 U.S.C. 1801 note) is amended by 
striking ``February 28, 2011'' and inserting ``December 31, 2013''.
    (c) FISA Amendments Act of 2008.--
            (1) Extension.--Section 403(b)(1) of the FISA Amendments 
        Act of 2008 (Public Law 110-261; 50 U.S.C. 1881 note) is 
        amended by striking ``December 31, 2012'' and inserting 
        ``December 31, 2013''.
            (2) Technical and conforming amendments.--Section 403(b)(2) 
        of such Act (Public Law 110-261; 122 Stat. 2474) is amended by 
        striking ``December 31, 2012'' and inserting ``December 31, 
        2013''.
            (3) Orders in effect.--Section 404(b)(1) of such Act 
        (Public Law 110-261; 50 U.S.C. 1801 note) is amended in the 
        heading by striking ``December 31, 2012'' and inserting 
        ``December 31, 2013''.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 626 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 626

             Relating to the retirement of Linda E. Sebold.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            December 7, 2006

     Mr. Frist (for himself and Mr. Reid) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

             Relating to the retirement of Linda E. Sebold.

Whereas Linda E. Sebold has faithfully served the United States Senate for more 
        than 33 years;
Whereas Linda began her service to the Senate as an assistant in the Disbursing 
        Office in 1973;
Whereas Linda became the Committee Scheduling Coordinator for the Daily Digest 
        in 1978 and was promoted to Editor of the Daily Digest in 1999;
Whereas Linda has been a leader in implementing technological advances in the 
        preparation of the Daily Digest;
Whereas Linda has made a significant contribution to continuity of government 
        planning;
Whereas, during her 33\1/2\ year tenure, she has at all times discharged the 
        difficult duties and responsibilities of her office with extraordinary 
        efficiency, aplomb, and devotion;
Whereas Linda's service to the Senate has been marked by her personal commitment 
        to the highest standards of excellence; and
Whereas Linda is retiring after more than 33 years service to the United States 
        Senate: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved,  That Linda E. Sebold be and hereby is commended for her 
outstanding service to her country and to the United States Senate.
    Sec. 2. The Secretary of the Senate shall transmit a copy of this 
resolution to Linda E. Sebold.
                                 <all>
```
No. 50735.

#### Protests 964865-G, etc., of R. H. Macy & Co. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 91 (Friday, May 11, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 26801]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-9085]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Navy


Meeting of the U.S. Naval Academy Board of Visitors

AGENCY: Department of the Navy, DOD.

ACTION: Notice of partially closed meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Naval Academy Board of Visitors will meet to make 
such inquiry, as the Board shall deem necessary into the state of 
morale and discipline, the curriculum, instruction, physical equipment, 
fiscal affairs, and academic methods of the Naval Academy. The meeting 
will include discussions of personnel issues at the Naval Academy, the 
disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of 
personal privacy. The executive session of this meeting will be closed 
to the public.

DATES: The open session of the meeting will be held on Tuesday, June 5, 
2007, from 8 a.m. to 11:10 a.m. The closed Executive Session will be 
held from 11:10 a.m. to 12:15 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the United States Naval Academy, 
Annapolis, Maryland.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Major Craig C. Clemans, Executive 
Secretary to the Board of Visitors, Office of the Superintendent, U.S. 
Naval Academy, Annapolis, MD 21402-5000, 410-293-1503.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice of meeting is provided per the 
Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App. 2). The executive session 
of the meeting will consist of discussions of personnel issues at the 
Naval Academy and internal Board of Visitors matters. The proposed 
closed session from 1030-1215 will include a discussion of new and 
pending courts-martial and state criminal proceedings involving the 
Midshipmen attending the Naval Academy to include an update on the 
pending/ongoing sexual assault cases, rape cases, etc. The proposed 
closed session from 1030-1215 will include a discussion of new and 
pending administrative/minor disciplinary infractions and nonjudicial 
punishments involving the Midshipmen attending the Naval Academy to 
include but not limited to individual honor/conduct violations within 
the Brigade. Discussion of such information cannot be adequately 
segregated from other topics, which precludes opening the executive 
session of this meeting to the public. Accordingly, the Secretary of 
the Navy has determined in writing that the meeting shall be partially 
closed to the public because it will be concerned with matters listed 
in section 552b(c), (5), (6), (7) and of title 5, United States Code.

    Dated: May 7, 2007.
L.R. Almand,
Office of the Judge Advocate General, Administrative Law Division, 
Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. E7-9085 Filed 5-10-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P
### Water resources of California, Part III, Stream measurements in the Great Basin and Pacific coast river basins

By: J.C. HoytHarry Deyoe McGlashanH.J. Dean

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp300

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
#### Majestic Shipping & Forwarding Co. *v.*United States

No. 8043

Entered at New York, N. Y.

Entry Nos. 768890; 768891-1/3; 774982.

(Decided August 23, 1951)

*Siegel, Mandell & Davidson (Sidney Mandell*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*David N. Edelstein,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Johnson, Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between counsel for the respective parties hereto, subject to the approval of the Court, that the merchandise subject of the above entitled reappraisement appeals at the time of exportation of such merchandise to the United States, such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of Italy in the usual wholesale quantity and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, plus, when not included in such price, the cost of containers and coverings of whatsoever nature and all other costs, charges, and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States, at the appraised values less the additions made under Section 503 to meet advances by the Appraiser in similar cases.

> IT IS EURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED, that on or about the dates of exportation of the merchandise covered by the invoices and entries subject ot [sic] the appeals to reappraisement noted above, there was no foreign market value as defined in Section 402-(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that these cases may be submitted on the foregoing stipulation.

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values were the appraised values, less the additions made under section 503 of the Tariff Act of 1930 to meet advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-1532

CHARLENA SINGLETON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

AL CANNON, Sheriff, Charleston County,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge.

(CA-99-3636-2-18)

Submitted: August 29, 2002 Decided: September 4, 2002

Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charlena Singleton, Appellant Pro Se. Bernard Eugene Ferrara, Jr.,

CHARLESTON COUNTY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, North Charleston, South

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Charlena Singleton appeals the district court’s orders denying

her motion to reopen her case and her motion for relief from

judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60. We have reviewed the

record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. See Singleton v. Cannon, No. CA-99-3636-2-18 (D.S.C. Apr.

24, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
(Reap. Dec. 9841)

#### Andrew Fisher Cycle Company et al. *v.*United States

Entry No. 3836, etc.

*555(Decided November 17, 1960)

*Brooks <& Brooks*for tbe plaintiffs.

*George Oockraru Boult,*Assistant Attorney General, for tbe defendant.

Olivee, Chief Judge:

The appeals for reappraisment enumerated in schedule “A,” hereto attached and made a part hereof, are before me for decision on a written stipulation, reading as follows:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between tbe parties hereto, subject to tbe approval of tbe Court,

> 1. That tbe merchandise here involved consists of bicycles imported from Germany for the account of plaintiff herein under tbe entries enumerated in tbe attached schedule A,

> 2. That said bicycles were appraised on tbe basis of statutory cost of production.

> 3. That tbe cost of materials and fabrication, manipulation, or other process employed in manufacturing or producing such or similar merchandise at a time preceding tbe date of exportation of the involved merchandise which would ordinarily permit the manufacture or production thereof in the usual course of business, plus the usual general expenses (not less than 10 per centum of such cost) in the case of such or similar merchandise, plus the cost of all containers and coverings, and all other costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition packed ready for shipment to the United States, and plus an addition for profit (not less than 8 per centum of the costs of materials and fabrication or manipulation and general expenses) equal to the profit which ordinarily is added in the case of merchandise of the same general character by manufacturers or producers in the country of manufacture who are engaged in the manufacture of merchandise of the same class or kind equals

> for the merchandise marked “A”, U.S. $18.29 each;

> for the merchandise marked “B”, U.S. $18.29 each, plus cost of packing as invoiced;

> for the merchandise marked “C”, U.S. $16.89 each, plus cost of packing as invoiced.

> 4. That the reappraisement appeals herein may be submitted upon this stipulation.

On tbe agreed facts, I find tbat tbe proper basis for appraisement of tbe bicycles in question is cost of production, as defined in section 402(f) of tbe Tariff Act of 1930, and bold that such statutory value for tbe articles represented by the invoice items marked “A” is $18.29 (United States currency) each, for the articles represented by tbe invoice items marked “B” is $18.29 (United States currency) each, plus cost of packing, as invoiced, and for tbe articles represented by the invoice items marked “C” is $16.89 (United States currency) each, plus cost of packing, as invoiced.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATIONS
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Kansas City Southern de México, S.A. de
C.V. (the registrant);
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the consolidated financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented
in this report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
   /s/ José Guillermo Zozaya DelanoJosé Guillermo Zozaya DelanoFebruary 11, 2010
    President and Executive Representative (Principal Executive Officer)
October 2, 1942

No. 47619.

#### Protest 5727-K of Biddle Purchasing Co.

Plaintiff’s application for rehearing granted.