alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 43150.

#### Protests 751023-G, etc., of Cherry Co. et al. (Honolulu).

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
#### Elisabate Awgechew WOLDE, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 03-71893.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 14, 2005.*

Decided Sept. 16, 2005.

Dario Aguirre, Esq., San Diego, CA, for Petitioner.

*857Regional Counsel, Western Region Immigration & Naturalization Service, Laguna Niguel, CA, Ronald E. Lefevre, Chief Legal Officer, Office of The District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Emily A. Radford, Esq., Allen W. Hausman, DOJ—U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Div./Office Of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: GRABER and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges, and FOGEL,** District Judge.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

**

 The Honorable Jeremy D. Fogel, United States District Judge for the Northern District of California, sitting by designation.

MEMORANDUM ***

Petitioner Elisabate Awgechew Wolde seeks review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals, which affirmed an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) denial of her application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture. We review for substantial evidence, *Gui v. INS,*280 F.3d 1217, 1225 (9th Cir.2002), and deny the petition.

Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s finding that Petitioner was not credible and that she failed to provide evidence of her identity. Among other things, Petitioner used two passports, each from a different country and each using a different alias. She also introduced two different birth certificates, one of which she admitted was a fake. Despite a continuance to allow her time to obtain certified documentation of her identity, Petitioner failed to present any such documentation. Additionally, the IJ permissibly relied on Petitioner’s demeanor, *Singh-Kaur v. INS,*183 F.3d 1147, 1151 (9th Cir.1999), and on her presentation of materially inconsistent testimony concerning the Oromo ethnic group, an issue at the heart of her claim, *Kaur v. Gonzales,*418 F.3d 1061, 1066-67 (9th Cir.2005).

PETITION DENIED.

***

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 126 

To reduce the amount of financial assistance provided to the Government 

of Mexico in response to the illegal border crossings from Mexico into 

the United States, which serve to dissipate the political discontent with 

the higher unemployment rate within Mexico. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 25 (legislative day, JANUARY 5), 2011 

Mr. VITTER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Rules and Administration 

A BILL 

To reduce the amount of financial assistance provided to 

the Government of Mexico in response to the illegal 

border crossings from Mexico into the United States, 

which serve to dissipate the political discontent with the 

higher unemployment rate within Mexico. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. BORDER CROSSING ACCOUNTABILITY. 

4 (a) ESTIMATION OF ANNUAL ILLEGAL BORDER

5 CROSSINGS.—Not later than 30 days after the end of each 

6 fiscal year, the Secretary of State, in consultation with the 

7 Secretary of Homeland Security, shall estimate the numVerDate Mar 15 2010 20:16 Feb 03, 2011 Jkt 099200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S126.IS S126

emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 126 IS

1 ber of illegal border crossings that occurred during such 

2 fiscal year along the southern land border of the United 

3 States. 

4 (b) REDUCTION OF FOREIGN ASSISTANCE.— 

5 (1) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided under 

6 paragraph (2), the Secretary of State, shall propor7 tionately reduce the amount of financial assistance 

8 provided to the Government of Mexico for each fiscal 

9 year by a total of $1,000 for each illegal border 

10 crossing from Mexico to the United States during 

11 the previous fiscal year. 

12 (2) EXCEPTION.—Notwithstanding paragraph 

13 (1), the Secretary of State may decide not to reduce 

14 the amounts appropriated for the Government of 

15 Mexico from the International Military Education 

16 and Training Fund, the International Narcotics 

17 Control and Law Enforcement Fund, and the fund 

18 to carry out nonproliferation, anti-terrorism, 

19 demining, and related programs and activities. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
---

Exhibit 99.8

Summary of Mortgage Contract of Maximum Amount ( the Contract) Entered into

by and between Shenzhen BAK Battery, Co., Ltd (the Mortgager) and Shenzhen

Longgang Branch, Bank of China (the Creditor) on March
8th, 2010

Main contents:

- Contract number: 2010 Zhenzhongyin Gang Edi 000119;
- In order to guarantee the indebtedness of Shenzhen BAK Battery Co., Ltd. (the Obligor) towards the Creditor under the Comprehensive Credit Facility Agreement of Maximum Amount (reference no.: 2010Zhenzhongyin Gang Exiezi 000119) from
March 4, 2010 to March 4, 2011, the Mortgager agrees to pledge its property to the Creditor.
- Scope of Guaranty:The guaranty shall cover all of the loan principal, interest, penalty interest, breach of contract compensation, damages, undertaking fee and all the expenses such as litigation cost, lawyers fee, notification cost
and public notice cost etc. which is incurred to the Creditor in realizing its creditors right.
- Collaterals:The Mortgager agrees to pledge its machineries and equipments to the Creditor.

Headlines of the articles omitted:

- Payment on demand
- Validity of the Creditors Right
- Occupancy of Collaterals
- Mortgage Registration
- Settlement of reduced-value Collaterals
- Interest generated
- Collaterals insurance
- Realizing of Creditors Right
- Declaration and undertaking of the Mortgager
- Breach of Contract and settlement
- Modification, Amendment and Termination of Contract
- Fee
- Effectiveness and Disputation settlement
- Attachment
- Supplement articles

---
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of China BAK Battery, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for
the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report). I, Li Xiangqian, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: August 22, 2006



By:

/s/ Li XiangqianLi XiangqianChief Executive Officer
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**
MEMORANDUM OPINION
N o. 04

- 13

- 00158

- CR
Hazel Dolores VERA , Appellant

v. The STATE of The STATE of Texas, Appellee
From the 227th Judicial District Court , Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2012CR7719W Honorable Philip A. Kazen Jr. , Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
Delivered and Filed: May 15, 2013
DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION Appellant Hazel Dolor es Vera pled nolo contendere to possession of less than one gram of cocaine. On September 20, 2012, Appellant’s adjudication of guilt was deferred and she was placed on community supervision. On February 19, 2013, the trial court amended Appellant’s
cond itions of community supervision. Appellant seeks to appeal from the trial court’s order modifying the conditions of her deferred adjudication. On May 1, 2013, we notified Appellant that “a n order modifying the terms or conditions of deferred adjudicatio n is not in itself appealable .” Davis v. State , 195 S.W.3d 708, 711 (Tex.04

- 13

- 00158

- CR

- 2

- Crim. App. 2006) ; see Basaldua v. State , 558 S.W.2d 2, 5 (Tex. Crim. App. 1977). We ordered Appellant to show cause in writing why her appeal should not be dismissed for want of ju risdiction.
In her M ay 2, 2013 response to our May 1, 2013 order , Appellant’s counsel agreed that this court lacks jurisdiction to hear Appellant’s appeal. Because the order modifying the terms of Appellant’s deferred adjudication is not an appealable o rder, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Davis , 195 S.W.3d at 711; Basaldua , 558 S.W.2d at 5.

PER CURIAM
DO NOT PUBLISH
**Exhibit        23**

 

 

CONSENT        OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

We consent        to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements:

 

 

| Form S-4 Registration Statement No. 333-123014;                        |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Form S-4 Registration Statement No. 333-120300;                        |
| Form S-8 Registration Statement No. 333-117966;                        |
| Form S-8 Registration Statement No. 333-122671;                        |
| Form S-8 Registration                        Statement No. 333-75615;  |
| Form S-8 Registration Statement No.                        333-107064; |
| Form S-3 Registration Statement No. 333-75675;                         |
| Form S-4 Registration Statement No.                        333-45821;  |
| Form S-3 Registration Statement No.                        333-74280;  |
| Form S-4 Registration Statement No.                        333-83106   |
| Form S-8 Registration Statement No.                        333-138523  |
| Form S-3 Registration Statement No.                        333-141313  |
| Form S-3 Registration Statement No.                        333-145619  |
| Form S-8 Registration Statement No.                        333-57968   |
| Form S-8 Registration Statement No.                        333-57976   |
| Form S-8 Registration Statement No. 333-50917                          |
|                                                                   |

 

of our        reports dated February 28, 2008, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of        Coventry Health Care, Inc. and the effectiveness of Coventry Health Care, Inc.’s        internal control over financial reporting included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for        the year ended December 31, 2007.

 

/s/ Ernst        & Young LLP

 

Baltimore,        Maryland

February        28, 2008
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997             DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       1,407,126               1,394,990
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,619,834               2,556,685
<PP&E>                                               0                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,619,834               2,556,685
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           19,928                  30,653
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,599,906               2,526,032
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,619,834               2,556,685
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                14,089                  22,906
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                18,672                  19,186
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 73,874                  57,399
<INCOME-TAX>                                    73,874                  57,399
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                    73,874                  57,399
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0
        

</TABLE>
# C_2016410EN.01003505.xml

| 7.11.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 410/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.11.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 410/35

---

Order of the General Court of 14 September 2016 — Cham et Bena Properties v Council

(Case T-708/15) (1)

1

(2016/C 410/61)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 59, 15.2.2016.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           1,283,711
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,832,526
<ALLOWANCES>                                       390,000
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,072,208
<PP&E>                                          28,246,019
<DEPRECIATION>                                  13,068,655
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  31,503,945
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,011,500
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                         2,129,155
<OTHER-SE>                                      14,027,605
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    31,503,945
<SALES>                                         11,889,237
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                11,889,237
<CGS>                                            8,423,745
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    8,423,745
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 401,593
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    499,847
<INCOME-TAX>                                       251,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                248,847
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0 
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       248,847
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .01
        

</TABLE>
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# DLA members learn to communicate using ASL

By Tanekwa Bournes, DLA Energy Public Affairs

                FORT BELVOIR, Virginia  –              

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

EEOResilencyPeople & Culture
Exhibit 23.2

July 27, 2009

Mr. Richard M. Grubel

Senior Vice President

The PBSJ Corporation

5300 West
Cypress Street, Suite 200

Tampa, FL 33607

Consent of Independent Appraisal Firm

We hereby consent to the reference to Sheldrick, McGehee & Kohler, LLC and to the
incorporation of information contained in our Valuation Report dated January 12, 2009 in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of The PBSJ Corporation for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, to which this consent is an exhibit.



|                        
|------------------------
|Sincerely,              
|                        
|/s/ Steven M. Rosenbloom
|Steven M. Rosenbloom    
|President
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE
QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         986,320
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  344,717
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     66,878
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,527,342
<PP&E>                                       4,356,708
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,778,709
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              20,189,040
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,756,114
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        32,494
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                20,189,040
<SALES>                                      2,925,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,565,427
<CGS>                                          962,270
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  962,270
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,978,835
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              43,270
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                624,322
<INCOME-TAX>                                   265,895
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            358,427
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   358,427
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.11


</TABLE>
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-23-00069-CV

John J. PARKER Jr.,

Appellant

v.

OHIO DEVELOPMENT, LLC,

Appellee

From the 451st Judicial District Court, Kendall County, Texas

Trial Court No. 12-298A

Honorable Kirsten Cohoon, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARTINEZ, JUSTICE RODRIGUEZ, AND JUSTICE 

VALENZUELA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is 

REVERSED, and we REMAND for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. Costs of the 

appeal are taxed against the appellee.

SIGNED April 30, 2024.

_____________________________

Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice