Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 91 / Friday, May 11, 2007 / Notices 26781 

Whereas, BIS and Mahmood have 

entered into a Settlement Agreement 

pursuant to Section 766.18(a) of the 

Regulations whereby they agreed to 

settle this matter in accordance with the 

terms and conditions set forth therein, 

and 

Whereas, I have approved the terms of 

such Settlement Agreement; 

It is therefore ordered: 

First, that for a period of ten years 

from the date of entry of this Order, 

Khalid Mahmood, 11505 Blue Ridge 

Drive, Beltsville, MD 20750, and when 

acting for or on behalf of Mahmood, his 

representatives or agents (‘‘Denied 

Person’’) may not, directly or indirectly, 

participate in any way in any 

transaction involving any commodity, 

software, or technology (hereinafter 

collectively referred to as ‘‘item’’) 

exported or to be exported from the 

United States that is subject to the 

Regulations, or in any other activity 

subject to the Regulations, including, 

but not limited to: 

A. Applying for, obtaining, or using 

any license, License Exception, or 

export control document; 

B. Carrying on negotiations 

concerning, or ordering, buying, 

receiving, using, selling, delivering, 

storing, disposing of, forwarding, 

transporting, financing, or otherwise 

servicing in any way, any transaction 

involving any item exported or to be 

exported from the United States that is 

subject to the Regulations, or in any 

other activity subject to the Regulations; 

or 

C. Benefitting in any way from any 

transaction involving any item exported 

or to be exported from the United States 

that is subject to the Regulations, or in 

any other activity subject to the 

Regulations. 

Second, that no person may, directly 

or indirectly, do any of the following: 

A. Export or reexport to or on behalf 

of the Denied Person any items subject 

to the Regulations; 

B. Take any action that facilitates the 

acquisition or attempted acquisition by 

the Denied Person of the ownership, 

possession, or control of any item 

subject to the Regulations that has been 

or will be exported from the United 

States, including financing or other 

support activities related to a 

transaction whereby the Denied Person 

acquires or attempts to acquire such 

ownership, possession or control; 

C. Take any action to acquire from or 

to facilitate the acquisition or attempted 

acquisition from the Denied Person of 

any item subject to the Regulations that 

has been exported from the United 

States; 

D. Obtain from the Denied Person in 

the United States any item subject to the 

Regulations with knowledge or reason 

to know that the item will be, or is 

intended to be, exported from the 

United States; or 

E. Engage in any transaction to service 

any item subject to the Regulations that 

has been or will be exported from the 

United States and which is owned, 

possessed or controlled by the Denied 

Person, or service any item, of whatever 

origin, that is owned, possessed or 

controlled by the Denied Person if such 

service involves the use of any item 

subject to the Regulations that has been 

or will be exported from the United 

States. For purposes of this paragraph, 

servicing means installation, 

maintenance, repair, modification or 

testing. 

Third, that, after notice and 

opportunity for comment as provided in 

Section 766.23 of the Regulations, any 

person, firm, corporation, or business 

organization related to Mahmood by 

affiliation, ownership, control, or 

position of responsibility in the conduct 

of trade or related services may also be 

made subject to the provisions of the 

Order. 

Fourth, that this Order does not 

prohibit any export, reexport, or other 

transaction subject to the Regulations 

where the only items involved that are 

subject to the Regulations are the 

foreign-produced direct product of U.S.- 

origin technology. 

Fifth, that the proposed charging 

letter, the Settlement Agreement, and 

this Order shall be made available to the 

public. 

Sixth, that this Order shall be served 

on the Denied Person and on BIS, and 

shall be published in the Federal 

Register. 

This Order, which constitutes the 

final agency action in this matter, is 

effective immediately. 

Entered this 2nd day of May 2007. 

Darryl W. Jackson, 

Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Export 

Enforcement. 

[FR Doc. 07–2322 Filed 5–10–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–OT–M 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

A–570–846 

Brake Rotors From the People’s 

Republic of China: Notice of Extension 

of the Preliminary Results of 

Antidumping Duty New Shipper 

Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

EFFECTIVE DATE: May 11, 2007. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Jennifer Moats or Blanche Ziv, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office 8, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–5047 and (202) 

482–4207, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

The Department of Commerce (‘‘the 

Department’’) received a timely request 

from Longkou Qizheng Auto Parts Co., 

Ltd. (‘‘Qizheng’’), in accordance with 19 

CFR 351.214(c), to conduct a 

semiannual new shipper review of the 

antidumping duty order on brake rotors 

from the People’s Republic of China 

(‘‘PRC’’). See Notice of Antidumping 

Duty Order: Brake Rotors from the 

People’s Republic of China, 62 FR 18740 

(April 17, 1997). On November 30, 2006, 

the Department found that the request 

for review with respect to Qizheng met 

all of the regulatory requirements set 

forth in 19 CFR 351.214(b) and initiated 

a semiannual new shipper review of the 

antidumping duty order on brake rotors 

for the April 1, 2006, through September 

30, 2006, period. See Brake Rotors from 

the People’s Republic of China: 

Initiation of New Shipper Review, 71 FR 

69203 (November 30, 2006). On March 

8, 2007, the Department expanded the 

period of review (‘‘POR’’) of this 

semiannual new shipper review through 

October 30, 2006, to capture the entry 

corresponding to Qizheng’s first sale to 

the United States. See Memorandum to 

Wendy J. Frankel, Office Director, 

through Blanche Ziv, Program Manager, 

from Jennifer Moats, Analyst, Regarding 

Expansion of the Period of Review. 

Therefore, the POR for the semiannual 

new shipper review of Qizheng is April 

1, 2006, through October 30, 2006. The 

preliminary results are currently due no 

later than May 21, 2007. 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with NOTICES
26782 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 91 / Friday, May 11, 2007 / Notices 

1Although 30 days after publication of the 

Preliminary Rescission was April 7, 2007, this date 

fell on a Saturday. Therefore, case briefs and 

hearing requests were not due until close of 

business, the next business day (i.e., Monday, April 

9, 2007), as the agency’s regulations clarify that 

where the applicable time limit expires on a nonbusiness day, the Secretary will accept documents 

that are filed on the next business day. See 19 CFR 

351.303(b). 

Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary 

Results 

Section 751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’), 

and 19 CFR 351.214(i)(1) require the 

Department to issue the preliminary 

results of a new shipper review within 

180 days after the date on which the 

new shipper review was initiated and 

final results of a review within 90 days 

after the date on which the preliminary 

results were issued. The Department 

may, however, extend the time period 

for completion of the preliminary 

results of a new shipper review to 300 

days if it determines that the case is 

extraordinarily complicated. See 19 CFR 

351.214(i)(2) and 751 (a)(2)(B)(iv) of the 

Act. 

The Department has determined that 

the review is extraordinarily 

complicated, as the Department must 

gather additional information, issue 

additional supplemental questionnaires, 

and conduct verification of the 

responses. Based on the timing of the 

case and the additional information that 

must be gathered and verified, the 

preliminary results of this new shipper 

review cannot be completed within the 

statutory time limit of 180 days. 

Accordingly, the Department is 

extending the time limit for the 

completion of the preliminary results of 

the new shipper review of Qizheng to 

300 days. See 751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of the Act 

and 19 CFR 351.214(i)(2). The 

preliminary results will now be due no 

later than September 18, 2007, in 

accordance with section 751(a)(2)(B)(iv) 

of the Act and 19 CFR 351.214(i)(2). The 

final results will be due 90 days after 

the date of issuance of the preliminary 

results, unless extended. 

We are issuing this notice in 

accordance with sections 

751(a)(2)(B)(iv) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. 

Dated: May 7, 2007. 

Stephen J. Claeys, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. E7–9132 Filed 5–10–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–848] 

Freshwater Crawfish Tail Meat From 

the People’s Republic’s of China: 

Rescission of New Shipper Reviews 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On March 7, 2007, the 

Department of Commerce 

(‘‘Department’’) published its 

preliminary notice of its intent to 

rescind the 2005/2006 simi-annual new 

shipper reviews of the antidumping 

duty order on freshwater crawfish tail 

meat from the People’s Republic of 

China (‘‘PRC’’). See Freshwater Crawfish 

Tail Meat from the People’s Republic of 

China: Preliminary Notice of Intent to 

Rescind New Shipper Reviews, 72 FR 

10148 (March 7, 2007) (‘‘Preliminary 

Rescission’’). As we received no 

comments or new information after the 

publication of the Preliminary 

Rescission, we have made no changes to 

our preliminary decision to rescind the 

new shipper reviews of Nanjing Merry 

Trading Co., Ltd. (‘‘Nanjing Merry’’), 

Leping Lotai Foods Co., Ltd. (‘‘Leping 

Lotai’’), Weishan Hongrun Aquatic Food 

Co., Ltd. (‘‘Weishan Hongrun’’), and 

Shanghai Strong International Trading 

Co., Ltd. (‘‘Shanghai Strong’’). 

EFFECTIVE DATES: May 11, 2007. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Erin 

Begnal or Scot Fullerton, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office 9, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–1442 or (202) 482–

1386, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On March 7, 2007, the Department 

published its preliminary notice of its 

intent to rescind the 2005/2006 semiannual new shipper reviews of the 

antidumping duty order on freshwater 

crawfish tail meat from the PRC, and 

invited parties to comment on the 

preliminary rescission. See Preliminary 

Rescission. In the Preliminary 

Rescission, the Department indicated, 

pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c)(ii), that 

interested parties may submit case briefs 

within 30 days of the date of the 

Preliminary Rescission. Additionally, 

the Department indicated that any 

interested party may also request a 

hearing within 30 days of publication of 

the Preliminary Rescission, in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.310(c). 

As of April 9, 2007, however, 30 days 

after publication of the Preliminary 

Rescission, no interested party 

submitted a case brief or requested a 

hearing be held in the context of the 

above-referenced new shipper reviews.1

Scope of Order 

The product covered by this 

antidumping duty order is freshwater 

crawfish tail meat, in all its forms 

(whether washed or with fat on, 

whether purged or unpurged), grades, 

and sizes; whether frozen, fresh, or 

chilled; and regardless or how it is 

packed, preserved, or prepared. 

Excluded from the scope of the order are 

live crawfish and other whole crawfish, 

whether boiled, frozen, fresh, or chilled. 

Also excluded are saltwater crawfish 

and any type, and parts thereof. 

Freshwater crawfish tail meat is 

currently classifiable in the Harmonized 

Tariff Schedule of the United States 

(‘‘HTSUS’’) under item numbers 

1605.40.10.10 and 1605.40.10.90, which 

are the HTSUS numbers for prepared 

foodstuffs, indicating peeled crawfish 

tail meat and other, as introduced by 

U.S. Customs and Border Protection 

(‘‘CBP’’) in 2000, and HTSUS numbers 

0306.19.00.10 and 0306.29.00.00, which 

are reserved for fish and crustaceans in 

general. The HTSUS subheadings are 

provided for convenience and customs 

purposes only. The written description 

of the scope of this order is dispositive. 

Period of Review 

The period of review (POR) is 

September 1, 2005, through February 

28, 2006. 

Analysis of Comments Received 

As noted above, we received no 

comments from interested parties in 

response to the Preliminary Rescission. 

While the Department normally issues a 

separate Issues and Decision 

Memorandum which accompanies a 

final results/rescission notice published 

in the Federal Register, since no briefs 

were submitted in the above-referenced 

new shipper reviews, a separate 

memorandum is not required. 

Final Rescission 

Concurrent with the Preliminary 

Rescission, the Department issued a 

memorandum detailing our analysis of 

the bona fides of Weishan Hongrun’s 

U.S. sale and our preliminary decision 

to rescind the review based on the 

totality of the circumstances of the sale. 

See Memorandum to James C. Doyle, 

Director, AD/CVD Operations, Office 9, 

Import Administration, through 

Christopher D. Riker, Program Manager, 

AD/CVD Operations, Office 9, from Scot 

Fullerton, Senior Case Analyst, AD/CVD 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with NOTICES