alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 315 

Supporting the idea that coalition victory in Iraq is possible. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 11, 2008 

Mr. WILSON of South Carolina (for himself, Mr. HENSARLING, Mr. AKIN, Mr. 

BACHUS, Mr. BARRETT of South Carolina, Mr. BARTON of Texas, Mrs. 

BLACKBURN, Mr. BOEHNER, Mr. BRADY of Texas, Mr. BROUN of Georgia, Mr. BURTON of Indiana, Mr. CAMPBELL of California, Mr. CANTOR, 

Mr. CARTER, Mr. CHABOT, Mr. CONAWAY, Mrs. CUBIN, Mr. CULBERSON, 

Mr. DAVID DAVIS of Tennessee, Ms. FALLIN, Ms. FOXX, Mr. FRANKS

of Arizona, Mr. GINGREY, Mr. GOHMERT, Ms. GRANGER, Mr. HERGER, 

Mr. ISSA, Mr. SAM JOHNSON of Texas, Mr. KING of Iowa, Mr. KINGSTON, Mr. KLINE of Minnesota, Mr. LAMBORN, Mr. LATTA, Mr. LEWIS

of Kentucky, Mr. LUCAS, Mr. MACK, Mr. MARCHANT, Mr. MCCAUL of 

Texas, Mr. MCHENRY, Mr. MCKEON, Mr. MILLER of Florida, Mrs. 

MUSGRAVE, Mrs. MYRICK, Mr. NEUGEBAUER, Mr. PENCE, Mr. PITTS, 

Mr. PLATTS, Mr. POE, Mr. PRICE of Georgia, Mr. PUTNAM, Mr. RADANOVICH, Mr. SALI, Mr. SESSIONS, Mr. SHADEGG, Mr. SMITH of Nebraska, 

Mr. SMITH of Texas, and Mr. WALBERG) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Supporting the idea that coalition victory in Iraq is possible. 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That the Congress— 

3 (1) supports the idea that the war in Iraq is not 

4 lost; 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
2 

•HCON 315 IH 

1 (2) recognizes that the overall progress being 

2 made on the ground in Iraq is undeniable; 

3 (3) recognizes that much of this progress is due 

4 to the skill, persistence, and valor of the American 

5 service member; 

6 (4) recognizes that the decision by the Presi7 dent and our military leadership to provide a surge 

8 of troops to implement a new counterinsurgency 

9 strategy was the correct course of action and has 

10 been successful; and 

11 (5) hopes for, and will do all it can to help en12 sure, coalition victory there as soon as possible. 

Æ 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
(Reap. Dec. 8441)

Entry No. 17457.

#### Nova Chemical Corporation *v.*United States

(Decided May 26, 1955)

Plaintiff not represented by counsel.

*Warren E. Burger,*Assistant Attorney General *(Henry J. O’Neill,*trial attorney), for the defendant.

Olivee, Chief Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon an agreed set of facts entered into by and between the respective parties hereto.

On the agreed facts I find the American selling price, as that value is defined in section 402 (g) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by section 8 of the Customs Administrative Act of 1938, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such value was $1.1385 per pound, less 1 per centum, net packed.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM UNIFAB
INTERNATIONAL, INC.'S JUNE 30, 1998 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                       6,217,037
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               16,465,560
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    214,234
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            23,842,263
<PP&E>                                      17,921,737
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,824,175
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              45,430,680
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        9,173,068
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        50,522
<OTHER-SE>                                  34,629,341
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                45,430,680
<SALES>                                     19,662,324
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            19,662,324
<CGS>                                       16,172,517
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               17,220,542
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              28,565
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,531,931
<INCOME-TAX>                                   875,431
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,656,500
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,656,500
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.33
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.33
        

</TABLE>
No. 40436.

#### Protests 557118-G, etc., of Bullocks, Inc. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

On the record presented the merchandise in question was held dutiable at 37}4 percent under paragraph 919 as claimed. Abstract 23241 followed.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 41 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 41

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),  
That when the House adjourns on the legislative day of Wednesday, 
January 24, 2007, on a motion offered pursuant to this concurrent 
resolution by its Majority Leader or his designee, it stand adjourned 
until 2 p.m. on Monday, January 29, 2007, or until the time of 

any reassembly pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution, 
whichever occurs first; and that when the House adjourns on the 
legislative day of Wednesday, January 31, 2007, on a motion offered 
pursuant to this concurrent resolution by its Majority Leader or his 
designee, it stand adjourned until 2 p.m. on Monday, February 5, 2007, 
or until the time of any reassembly pursuant to section 2 of this 
concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first.
    Sec. 2. The Speaker or her designee, after consultation with the 
Minority Leader, shall notify the Members of the House to reassemble at 
such place and time as she may designate if, in her opinion, the public 
interest shall warrant it.

            Passed the House of Representatives January 23, 2007.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
110th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                            H. CON. RES. 41

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

        Providing for a conditional adjournment of the House of 
                            Representatives.
```
# C_2019305EN.01003401.xml

| 9.9.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 305/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.9.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 305/34

---

Judgment of the General Court of 12 July 2019 — Sony Optiarc and Sony Optiarc America v Commission

(Case T-763/15) (1)

(Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Market for optical disk drives - Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement - Collusive agreements relating to bidding events concerning optical disk drives for notebook and desktop computers - Infringement by object - Rights of the defence - Obligation to state reasons - Principle of good administration - Fines - Single and continuous infringement - 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines)

(2019/C 305/40)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: Sony Optiarc, Inc. (Atsugi, Japan) and Sony Optiarc America, Inc. (San Jose, United States) (represented by: R. Snelders, lawyer, N. Levy and E. Kelly, Solicitors)

Defendant: European Commission (represented initially by: M. Farley, A. Biolan, C. Giolito, F. van Schaik and L. Wildpanner, and subsequently by M. Farley, F. van Schaik, L. Wildpanner and A. Dawes, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action under Article 263 TFEU seeking, principally, annulment in part of Commission Decision C(2015) 7135 final of 21 October 2015 final relating to a proceeding under Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case AT.39639 — Optical disk drives), or, in the alternative, a reduction of the amount of the fine imposed on the applicants.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Sony Optiarc, Inc. and Sony Optiarc America, Inc. to bear their own costs and pay the costs incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Sony Optiarc, Inc. and Sony Optiarc America, Inc. to bear their own costs and pay the costs incurred by the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 98, 14.3.2016.

---
```

[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 87 (Monday, May 7, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 25789]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-8676]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Advisory Committee on Nuclear Waste; Revised

    The 179th Advisory Committee on Nuclear Waste (ACNW) meeting 
scheduled to be held on May 16-17, 2007, Room T-2B3, Two White Flint 
North, 11545 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland has been revised as 
noted below. Notice of this meeting was previously published in the 
Federal Register on Thursday, April 26, 2007 (72 FR 20889).
    The discussion of the item on Yucca Mountain Preclosure Repository 
Design: NRC Staff Review Readiness and Views on the Issues, scheduled 
between 1 p.m. and 4 p.m. on Wednesday, May 16, 2007, is now scheduled 
between 1 p.m. and 3:30 p.m.
    The discussion of the topic on NCRP Study on Radiation Exposure of 
U.S. Population, scheduled between 4 p.m.--6 p.m. on Wednesday, May 16, 
2007 has been canceled. A discussion of ACNW Letter Reports will now 
take place between 3:45 p.m. and 5:30 p.m on Wednesday, May 16, 2007. 
All the other items remain the same as previously published in the 
Federal Register on Thursday, April 26, 2007 (72 FR 20889).
    For further information, contact Mr. Antonio L. Dias, (Telephone 
301-415-6805), between 6:45 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., ET.

    Dated: May 1, 2007.
Andrew L. Bates,
Advisory Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. E7-8676 Filed 5-4-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
```
NO. 12-17-00055-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

CITY OF EAST MOUNTAIN, 

APPELLANT

V.

KENNETH CRAIG MILLER,

APPELLEE

§

§

§

APPEAL FROM THE

COUNTY COURT

UPSHUR COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

This appeal is being dismissed for failure to comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate 

Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c).

On February 17, 2017, the clerk of this Court notified Appellant, City of East Mountain,

that the filing fee in this appeal is due. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5. Appellant was informed that 

failure to remit the filing fee on or before February 27, 2017, would result in the Court’s taking 

appropriate action, including dismissal of the case without further notice. See TEX. R. APP. P.

42.3(c). The date for remitting the filing fee has passed, and Appellant has not complied with the 

Court’s request.

Because Appellant has failed, after notice, to comply with Rule 5, the appeal is 

dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c).

Opinion delivered March 1, 2017.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.

(PUBLISH)
COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT

MARCH 1, 2017

NO. 12-17-00055-CV

CITY OF EAST MOUNTAIN,

Appellant

V.

KENNETH CRAIG MILLER,

Appellee

Appeal from the County Court 

of Upshur County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 16CV00139)

THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record; and the same being 

considered, it is the opinion of this Court that this appeal should be dismissed.

It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this Court that 

this appeal be, and the same is, hereby dismissed; and that this decision be certified to the court 

below for observance.

By per curiam opinion.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1369 

To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to exempt the conduct 

of silvicultural activities from national pollutant discharge elimination 

system permitting requirements. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 14, 2011 

Mr. CRAPO (for himself, Mr. WYDEN, Mr. RISCH, and Mr. BEGICH) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to exempt the conduct of silvicultural activities from national 

pollutant discharge elimination system permitting requirements. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Silviculture Regulatory 

5 Consistency Act’’. 


jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1369 IS

1 SEC. 2. SILVICULTURAL ACTIVITIES. 

2 Section 402(l) of the Federal Water Pollution Control 

3 Act (33 U.S.C. 1342(l)) is amended by adding at the end 

4 the following: 

5 ‘‘(3) SILVICULTURAL ACTIVITIES.— 

6 ‘‘(A) NPDES PERMIT REQUIREMENTS FOR

7 SILVICULTURAL ACTIVITIES.—The Adminis8 trator shall neither require a permit under this 

9 section, nor directly or indirectly require any 

10 State to require a permit under this section, for 

11 a discharge resulting from the conduct of any 

12 silvicultural activity, such as nursery oper13 ations, site preparation, reforestation and sub14 sequent cultural treatment, thinning, prescribed 

15 burning, pest and fire control, harvesting oper16 ations, surface drainage, or road use, construc17 tion, and maintenance, from which there is run18 off. 

19 ‘‘(B) PERMITS FOR DREDGED OR FILL MA20 TERIAL.—Nothing in this paragraph exempts 

21 the conduct of a silvicultural activity resulting 

22 in the discharge of dredged or fill material from 

23 any permitting requirement under section 

24 404.’’. 

Æ 


jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT
13.2
 
 CERTIFICATION
OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
 PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED BY
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES — OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 I, Robert
D. Daleo, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Thomson
Reuters PLC (the “Company”), hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:
 
 a) The
Company’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2008
(the “Form 20-F”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 b) The
information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
 
 Date:  March
30, 2009
 By:
                    /s/
      Robert D. DaleoRobert
      D. DaleoExecutive
      Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
 
 A signed
original of this written statement has been provided to Thomson Reuters and
will be retained by Thomson Reuters and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
FDMS Docket No. FAA-2013-0094

 Contacts. With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed? 

Organization Person Contacted Date Response 

National Business Aircraft Association Eli Cotti 9/13/12

Regional Airline Association 9/13/12

Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association Robert Hackman 9/13/12

ATA Joe White 9/13/12
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM UNITED AIR
LINES, INC.'S STATEMENT OF CONSOLIDATED OPERATIONS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE
30, 1999 AND CONDENSED STATEMENT OF CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL POSITION AS OF JUNE
30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           1,088
<SECURITIES>                                       221
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,607
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        275
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,734
<PP&E>                                          20,061
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,814
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  21,641
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,136
<BONDS>                                          5,066
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       5,349
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    21,641
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,680
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    8,115
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 188
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,158
<INCOME-TAX>                                       417
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                741
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      3
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       738
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-10-00364-CV

SHERYL BUCHANAN APPELLANT

V.

AMERICAN HOME MORTGAGE 

SERVICING, INC.

APPELLEE

------------

FROM THE 236TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

----------

Appellant Sheryl Buchanan, acting pro se, attempts to appeal from the 

“Order Granting Defendant’s Motion For Final Summary Judgment,” which was 

signed August 20, 2010. Buchanan filed a document entitled “Motion For New 

Trail” [sic] on September 23, 2010, more than thirty days after the final judgment, 

but the document was merely the order form for a motion for new trial along with 

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
2

an affidavit and exhibits. On October 15, 2010, Buchanan filed a second 

document entitled “Motion For New Trail” [sic] and her notice of appeal. See

Tex. R. App. P. 26.1 (providing that notice of appeal is generally due within thirty 

days after judgment is signed).

On October 19, 2010, because it appeared that the motion for new trial 

was filed after its September 20, 2010 due date and was untimely, depriving this 

court of jurisdiction, we notified Buchanan of our concern and requested that she 

advise us whether she had mailed the motion for new trial on or before its due 

date. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.1, 26.1 (providing, together, that appellate court 

has jurisdiction over timely filed notice of appeal). Buchanan did not respond.

Accordingly, because Buchanan’s motion for new trial was late, it did not 

extend her deadline for filing the notice of appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1. 

The notice of appeal remained due September 20, 2010, but it was not filed until 

October 15, 2010. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1. Because the notice of appeal was 

untimely, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 

26.1, 42.3(a), 43.2(f).

SUE WALKER

JUSTICE

PANEL: WALKER, MCCOY, and MEIER, JJ.

DELIVERED: November 24, 2010
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 92 (Monday, May 14, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 27168]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-9187]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration <greek-i> 10869]


West Virginia Disaster <greek-i> WV-00005

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major 
disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of West Virginia 
(FEMA-1696-DR), dated 5/1/2007.
    Incident: Severe Storms, Flooding, Landslides, and Mudslides.
    Incident Period: 4/14/2007 through 4/18/2007.

DATES: Effective Date: 5/1/2007.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 7/2/2007.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the President's major disaster declaration on 5/1/2007, Private Non-
Profit organizations that provide essential services of a governmental 
nature may file disaster loan applications at the address listed above 
or other locally announced locations.
    The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected 
by the disaster:

Primary Counties:
    Boone, Cabell, Lincoln, Logan, Mingo, Wayne, Wyoming
    The Interest Rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                               Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Other (Including Non-Profit Organizations) with Credit             5.250
 Available Elsewhere.......................................
Businesses And Non-Profit Organizations without Credit             4.000
 Available Elsewhere.......................................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 10869.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

Herbert L. Mitchell,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
 [FR Doc. E7-9187 Filed 5-11-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P