alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32

                          Rule 13a-14(b) Certification

The  undersigned  officer  certifies  that this report fully  complies  with the
requirements  of Section 13(a) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, and that
the  information  contained  in the  report  fairly  presents,  in all  material
respects,  the financial condition and results of operations of Global Concepts,
Ltd.

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to Global Concepts,  Ltd. and will be retained by Global Concepts, Ltd.
and  furnished  to the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  or its staff upon
request.


Dated: May 19, 2005              /s/ Eduardo Rodriguez
                                 ----------------------------
                                 Eduardo Rodriguez
                                 (Chief executive officer and
                                  chief financial officer)
```

[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 90 (Thursday, May 10, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 26614]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-8974]

[[Page 26614]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP05-164-010]

Equitrans, L.P.; Notice of Compliance Filing

May 4, 2007.
    Take notice that on April 30, 2007, Equitrans, L.P. (Equitrans) 
tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Original Volume No. 
1, Tenth Revised Sheet No. 11, with an effective date of June 1, 2007.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing must file in accordance 
with Rule 211 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 
CFR 385.211). Protests to this filing will be considered by the 
Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will 
not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Such protests 
must be filed in accordance with the provisions of Section 154.210 of 
the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 154.210). Anyone filing a protest 
must serve a copy of that document on all the parties to the 
proceeding.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests in lieu 
of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons 
unable to file electronically should submit an original and 14 copies 
of the protest to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First 
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
[email protected], or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-8974 Filed 5-9-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
```
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 3 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 3

  Expressing the sense of the Congress that the United States Postal 
 Service should issue commemorative postage stamps honoring Americans 
who have distinguished themselves by their service in the armed forces 
                         of the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 2007

   Mrs. Jo Ann Davis of Virginia submitted the following concurrent 
   resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and 
                           Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
  Expressing the sense of the Congress that the United States Postal 
 Service should issue commemorative postage stamps honoring Americans 
who have distinguished themselves by their service in the armed forces 
                         of the United States.

Whereas the United States Postal Service honored four distinguished American 
        soldiers when it issued its Distinguished Soldiers commemorative postage 
        stamps on May 3, 2000;
Whereas the Distinguished Soldiers commemorative postage stamps not only paid 
        tribute to the patriotism and uncommon valor of those brave soldiers, 
        but also served as a lasting tribute to the men and women of the United 
        States Army who have dedicated their lives to the defense of our 
        country; and
Whereas it is only fitting that similar recognition be given with respect to the 
        men and women serving in the other branches of the armed forces of the 
        United States: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),  
That it is the sense of the Congress that--
            (1) commemorative postage stamps should be issued by the 
        United States Postal Service honoring Americans who have 
        distinguished themselves by their service in the United States 
        Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps, and Coast Guard, respectively; 
        and
            (2) the Citizens' Stamp Advisory Committee should recommend 
        to the Postmaster General that such stamps be issued.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 86 (Friday, May 4, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 25283]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-8537]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER07-764-000]


Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC; Notice of Filing

April 30, 2007.
    Take notice that on April 30, 2007, Duke Energy Carolina, LLC filed 
a First Amended and Restated Agreement with Blue Ridge Electric 
Membership Corporation, dated April 16, 2007, to become effective May 
16, 2007.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. On or 
before the comment date, it is not necessary to serve motions to 
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f6b0b3a4b5b9989a9f9893a5838686998482b690938495d8919980"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e6a0a3b4a5a9888a8f8883b5939696899492a680839485c8818990">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on May 7, 2007.

Philis J. Posey,
Deputy Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E7-8537 Filed 5-3-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Van Oppen & Co., Inc. *v.*United States

No. 6788.

Entry Nos. 716415; 4345.

Invoices dated London, England, October 1943, etc.

Certified October 1943, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., December 3, 1943, etc.

(Decided January 22, 1947)

*Barnes, Richardson & Colburn (Hadley 8. King*of counsel) for the plaintiff. •

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Tilson, Judge:

In these two appeals it has been agreed by and between counsel that the issues presented are similar in all material respects to the issues involved in *United States*v. *Pitcairn,*C. A. D. 334, wherein our appellate court held that this so-called British purchase tax was not to be included as a part of the dutiable value of the merchandise, and the record in that case has been admitted in evidence in this case.

Upon the agreed facts and the law applicable thereto, I find and hold the proper dutiable export values of the merchandise covered by these two appeals to be the values found by the appraiser, less any amounts added by the importer on entry to meet advances made by the appraiser in similar cases then pending on appeal. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION

906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, David N. Vander Ploeg, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of School Specialty, Inc., certify, pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the knowledge of the undersigned:



| | 1. | The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 26, 2008 (the Report) which this statement accompanies fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of School Specialty, Inc.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: June 24, 2008



/s/ David N. Vander PloegDavid N. Vander PloegExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


This certification accompanies this Annual report on Form 10-K pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed as filed by School Specialty, Inc. for purposes of Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
#### J. J. Gavin & Co., Inc., a/c Salomon & Phillips *v.*United States

No. 8053.

Entered at New York, N. Y.

Entry Nos. 762820; 764136.

(Decided September 24, 1951)

*Lane, Young & Fox (William II. Fox*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*David N. Edelstein,*Assistant Attorney General *(Richard E. FitzGibbon,*special attorney), for the defendant.

Mollison, Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED BETWEEN COUNSEL, subject to the approval of the Court:

> That the issues in the appeals for reappraisement listed above are the same in all material respects as the issues decided in *J. J. GAVIN & CO., INC. (SALOMON &*PHILLIPS) v. *UNITED STATES,*C. A. D. 441; and that the record in said case may be incorporated herein.

> That the entered unit values of the merchandise involved in each of the above appeals, less 2)4% trade discount, less 2)4% cash discount,' plus cases and packing, are equal to the prices, on or about the time of exportation of such merchandise to the United States, at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale for home consumption to all purchasers in the principal markets of the United Kingdom, the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade.

> That on or about the time of exportation such or similar merchandise was not freely offered for sale in the United Kingdom for exportation to the United States.

> That these cases may be deemed to be submitted for decision upon this stipulation.

On the agreed facts I find the foreign value, as that value is defined in section 402 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Administrative Act of 1938, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values were the entered unit values, less 2%-per .centum trade discount, less per centum cash discount, plus cases and packing.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
```

[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 90 (Thursday, May 10, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26626-26627]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-9025]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[AMS-FRL-8311-3]

California State Motor Vehicle Pollution Control Standards; 
Request for Waiver of Federal Preemption; Opportunity for Public 
Hearing

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice announcing an additional hearing and hearing locations.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA previously announced the opportunity for public hearing 
and written comment on the California Air Resources Board's request for 
a waiver of preemption for its Greenhouse Gas Emission (GHG) 
regulations for passenger cars, light-duty trucks and medium-duty 
passenger vehicles beginning with the 2009 model year (MY). This 
previous announcement occurred on April 30, 2007 at 72 FR 21260. By 
this notice EPA is announcing the location of the May 22, 2007 hearing 
which commences at 9 a.m. EPA is also announcing an additional hearing, 
and location, for May 30, 2007 which will commence at 9 a.m. If you 
wish to present testimony at the May 22, 2007 hearing please follow the 
directions provided at 72 FR 21260. If you wish to present testimony at 
the May 30, 2007 hearing please follow the contact directions below.

[[Page 26627]]

ADDRESSES: The May 22, 2007 hearing will take place at the EPA Potomac 
Yard Conference Center, 2777 Crystal Drive--Room S-1204, Arlington, VA 
22202. The May 30, 2007 hearing will take place at the Byron Sher 
Auditorium, Cal/EPA Headquarters, 1001 I Street, Sacramento, CA 95814.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you wish to present testimony at 
the Sacramento, CA hearing then provide notification by May 23, 2007 to 
David Dickinson, Compliance and Innovative Strategies Division (6405J), 
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave, NW., 
Washington, DC 20460, e-mail address: [email protected].

    Dated: May 4, 2007.
William L. Wehrum,
Acting Assistant Administrator, Office of Air and Radiation.
 [FR Doc. E7-9025 Filed 5-9-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
##### 



(CIBC WORLD MARKETS LH (LONDON))

24th March 2004

Trench Electric Holding B.V.
Prof JH Bavincklaan 7
1183 Amstelveen
PO Box 7827
1008 AA Amsterdam
The Netherlands

Attn: Michael Bissell

Dear Sir

Re: Trench Electric Holding B.V. Facilities Agreement dd 18th April 2000

We refer to clause 17.1(g) of the above mentioned agreement and your letter
addressed to CIBC World Markets plc dated 15 March 2004 and we confirm having
received majority bank consent to waive the one-time overspend on the Shanghai
Capital Expenditure in respect of the Trench Capital Expenditure Covenant 2003.

Yours faithfully

/s/ Nick Burnham

Nick Burnham
Executive Director
European Portfolio Management
H. Con. Res. 32 Agreed to June 24, 2008 

One Hundred Tenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and eight 

Concurrent Resolution 

Whereas June 25, 2008, marks the 12th anniversary of the terrorist 

bombing of the Khobar Towers United States military housing 

compound in Dhahran, Saudi Arabia, on June 25, 1996; 

Whereas 19 members of the United States Air Force were killed, 

more than 500 other Americans were injured, and 297 innocent 

Saudi or Bangladeshi citizens were killed or injured in the terrorist attack; 

Whereas the 19 airmen killed while serving their country were 

Captain Christopher J. Adams, Staff Sergeant Daniel B. 

Cafourek, Sergeant Millard D. Campbell, Senior Airman Earl 

F. Cartrette, Jr., Technical Sergeant Patrick P. Fennig, Captain 

Leland T. Haun, Master Sergeant Michael G. Heiser, Staff Sergeant Kevin J. Johnson, Staff Sergeant Ronald L. King, Master 

Sergeant Kendall K. Kitson, Jr., Airman First Class Christopher 

B. Lester, Airman First Class Brent E. Marthaler, Airman First 

Class Brian W. McVeigh, Airman First Class Peter J. Morgera, 

Technical Sergeant Thanh V. Nguyen, Airman First Class Joseph 

E. Rimkus, Senior Airman Jeremy A. Taylor, Airman First Class 

Justin R. Wood, and Airman First Class Joshua E. Woody; 

Whereas the families of these brave airmen still mourn their loss; 

Whereas three months after that terrorist bombing, on September 

24, 1996, the House of Representatives agreed to House Concurrent Resolution 200 of the 104th Congress, honoring the victims 

of that terrorist bombing; 

Whereas on the fifth anniversary of that terrorist bombing, on 

June 25, 2001, the House of Representatives agreed to House 

Concurrent Resolution 161 of the 107th Congress, which was 

concurred in by the Senate on July 12, 2002, further honoring 

the victims of that bombing; 

Whereas on June 27, 2005, the House of Representatives agreed 

to House Concurrent Resolution 188 of the 109th Congress, further honoring the victims of that terrorist bombing; 

Whereas those guilty of carrying out the attack have yet to be 

brought to justice; and 

Whereas terrorism remains a constant and ever-present threat 

around the world: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), That, on the occasion of the 12th anniversary of the terrorist 

bombing of the Khobar Towers United States military housing 

compound in Dhahran, Saudi Arabia, Congress— 
H. Con. Res. 32—2 

(1) recognizes the service and sacrifice of the 19 members 

of the United States Air Force who died in that attack; 

(2) calls upon every American to pause and pay tribute 

to those brave airmen; 

(3) extends its continued sympathies to the families of 

those who died; and 

(4) assures the members of the Armed Forces serving anywhere in the world that their well-being and interests will 

at all times be given the highest priority. 

Attest: 

Clerk of the House of Representatives. 

Attest: 

Secretary of the Senate.
EXHIBIT 99

                  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Medina Coffee, Inc (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Harry Miller, Chief Financial Officer
and Chief Executive Office of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


 /s/ Harry Miller /s/
-------------------------------------
Harry Miller, Chief Financial Officer
and Chief Executive Officer

November 13, 2002
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 10.6

                       AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


     This AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (this "Amendment") is made and
                                                   ---------
entered into as of January 22, 2001 by and among Navigant International, Inc., a
Delaware corporation (the "Company"), and C. Thomas Nulty ("Employee").

                                 RECITAL
                                 -------

     WHEREAS the Company and the Employee are parties to an Employment
Agreement, dated as of May 17, 1999 (the "Agreement"), which the parties now
desire to amend as set forth herein.

                                 AGREEMENT
                                 ---------

     NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises herein made and for
other good and valuable consideration, the sufficiency of which is hereby
acknowledged, the Company and Employee hereby agree as follows:

     Section 1.  Amendments.
                 ----------

          (a) Employment; Term.  Section 1 of the Agreement is deleted, and
              ----------------
     replaced with a new Section 1 reading as follows:

          The Company hereby employs Employee to perform the duties described
     herein, and Employee hereby accepts employment with the Company, for a term
     beginning on May 17, 1999 and continuing until this Agreement is terminated
     as provided herein (the "Term").

          (b) Termination; Rights on Termination.  Section 6 of the Agreement is
              ----------------------------------
     amended by deleting the introductory phrase of that section, and replacing
     it with the following:

          This Agreement may be terminated in any of the following ways:


     Section 2.  Effect.  Except as specifically amended by this Amendment, the
                 ------
Agreement will remain in full force and effect.  All references to the
"Agreement" in the Agreement will hereafter be deemed to refer to the Agreement
as amended hereby.

     Section 3.  Miscellaneous.
                 -------------

          (a) Definitions.  Capitalized terms used and not defined herein have
              -----------
     the meanings given to such terms in the Agreement.

          (b) Counterparts.  This Amendment may be executed in one or more
              ------------
     counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original but all of which
     together shall constitute one and the same instrument.
<PAGE>

          (c) Governing Law.  This Amendment will be governed by the Governing
              -------------
     Law provision contained in the Agreement.


     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Assignor, the Assignee and Employee have executed
this Amendment as of the date first above written.

THE COMPANY                                    EMPLOYEE

NAVIGANT INTERNATIONAL, INC.


By:
   ---------------------------------           ------------------------------
Chief Executive Officer                        C. Thomas Nulty