alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### Correlation and analysis of water-temperature data for Oregon streams

By: A.M. Moore

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1819K

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- Superseded Publications:
                                        Correlation and analysis of water-temperature data for Oregon streams(1965)                                    

- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 130 

To prohibit authorized committees and leadership PACs from employing the 

spouse or immediate family members of any candidate or Federal office 

holder connected to the committee. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 25 (legislative day, JANUARY 5), 2011 

Mr. VITTER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Rules and Administration 

A BILL 

To prohibit authorized committees and leadership PACs from 

employing the spouse or immediate family members of 

any candidate or Federal office holder connected to the 

committee. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 130 IS

1 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON EMPLOYMENT OF FAMILY 

2 MEMBERS OF A CANDIDATE OR FEDERAL OF3 FICE HOLDER BY CERTAIN POLITICAL COM4 MITTEES. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Title III of the Federal Election 

6 Campaign Act of 1971 (2 U.S.C. 431 et seq.) is amended 

7 by inserting after section 324 the following new section: 

8 ‘‘SEC. 325. PROHIBITION ON EMPLOYMENT OF FAMILY 

9 MEMBERS OF A CANDIDATE OR FEDERAL OF10 FICE HOLDER BY CERTAIN POLITICAL COM11 MITTEES. 

12 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—It shall be unlawful for any au13 thorized committee of a candidate or any other political 

14 committee established, maintained, or controlled by a can15 didate or a person who holds a Federal office to employ— 

16 ‘‘(1) the spouse of such candidate or Federal 

17 office holder; or 

18 ‘‘(2) any immediate family member of such can19 didate or Federal office holder. 

20 ‘‘(b) IMMEDIATE FAMILY MEMBER.—For purposes of 

21 subsection (a), the term ‘immediate family member’ means 

22 a son, daughter, stepson, stepdaughter, son-in-law, daugh23 ter-in-law, mother, father, stepmother, stepfather, mother24 in-law, father-in-law, brother, sister, stepbrother, or step25 sister of the Member.’’. 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 130 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 this section shall take effect on the date of the enactment 

3 of this Act. 

4 SEC. 2. SPOUSE LOBBYING MEMBER. 

5 Section 207(e) of title 18, United States Code, is 

6 amended by adding at the end the following: 

7 ‘‘(10) SPOUSES.—Any person who is the spouse 

8 of a Member of Congress and who was not serving 

9 as a registered lobbyist at least 1 year prior to the 

10 election of that Member of Congress to office and 

11 who, after the election of such Member, knowingly 

12 lobbies on behalf of a client for compensation any 

13 Member of Congress or is associated with any such 

14 lobbying activity by an employer of that spouse shall 

15 be punished as provided in section 216 of this 

16 title.’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
# C_2019082EN.01003501.xml

| 4.3.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 82/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.3.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 82/35

---

Judgment of the General Court of 13 December 2018 — Iran Insurance v Council

(Case T-558/15) (1)

((Non-contractual liability - Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures against Iran - Freezing of funds - Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons and entities subject to restrictive measures - Material damage - Non-material damage))

(2019/C 82/39)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Iran Insurance Company (Tehran, Iran) (represented by: D. Luff, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: B. Driessen and M. Bishop, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: European Commission (represented by: F. Ronkes Agerbeek and R. Tricot, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application pursuant to Article 268 TFEU for compensation for the material and non-material damage allegedly suffered by the applicant following the adoption of Council Decision 2010/644/CFSP of 25 October 2010 amending Decision 2010/413/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Iran and repealing Common Position 2007/140/CFSP (OJ 2010 L 281, p. 81), of Council Regulation (EU) No 961/2010 of 25 October 2010 on restrictive measures against Iran and repealing Regulation (EC) No 423/2007 (OJ 2010 L 281, p. 1), of Council Decision 2011/783/CFSP of 1 December 2011 amending Decision 2010/413/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Iran (OJ 2011 L 319, p. 71), of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1245/2011 of 1 December 2011 implementing Regulation No 961/2010 (OJ 2011 L 319, p. 11), and of Council Regulation (EU) No 267/2012 of 23 March 2012 concerning restrictive measures against Iran and repealing Regulation No 961/2010 (OJ 2012 L 88, p. 1), by which the applicant’s name was included and maintained on the lists of persons and entities subject to restrictive measures.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Iran Insurance Company to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Iran Insurance Company to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union;

| 3. | Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 27, 25.1.2016.

---
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER



I, Harry E. Gruber, M.D., President and Chief Executive Officer of Kintera, Inc. (the Registrant), do hereby
certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:



(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant, to which this certification is attached as an exhibit (the Report), fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



Dated: November 9, 2005



|                                                                   
|-------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                   
|/s/ Harry E. Gruber, M.D.                                          
|Harry E. Gruber, M.D.                                              
|President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
Case No. 9,95Sa.

#### MURPHY v. TINDALL.

[Hempst. 10.] 1

Circuit Court, Territory of Arkansas.

April, 1822.

Replevin — Unlawful Taking — Against Whom Lies.

It is not essential to the maintenance of the action of replevin that the defendant should unlawfully take the property out of the possession of the plaintiff; but the action lies against all persons in whose possession personal property unlawfully taken may be found, except officers of the law who have possession by virtue of legal process.

At law. Appeal determined before JOHNSON, SCOTT, and SELDEN, JJ.

OPINION OF

THE COURT.

This was an action of replevin brought by [Benjamin] Murphy against [Thomas H.] Tindall, and upon the trial of the cause a verdict was rendered in favor of the defendant, from which the plaintiff appealed to this court. The only question presented for consideration is, whether the court below erred in the instruction given to the jury, on motion of the defendant, which was that, “unless it was proved that the defendant took the property out of the possession of the plaintiff unlawfully, and against the plaintiff’s consent, the jury must find for the defendant.” We are clearly of opinion that this instruction was erroneous. It is true, that it was necessary to establish an unlawful taking from the plaintiff in order to support the action; but it was not necessary to prove the unlawful talcing by the defendant. It was sufficient to prove it by any other person. This, we apprehend, is the doctrine of the common law, (1 Chit PI. 185,) and by reference to the statute of this territory, (Geyer’s Dig. 333.) it is clear that the action of replevin is maintainable against any person in whose hands or possession the property may be found. We are of opinion, then, that the action of replevin lies against all persons in whose possession personal property unlawfully taken may be found, except officers of the law, who may have possession by virtue of legal process. In the opinion we have given we are supported by the authorities re ferred to in 1 Chit. FI. 1S5, 380. Reversed.
Before the Third Division,

June 17, 1958

No. 62086.

#### Air Clearance Association, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 314050-K (A) (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with rule 5 (b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
**Exhibit 10.17**

 

**AMENDMENT TO THE**

**KINTERA, INC.**

**2000 STOCK OPTION PLAN**

 

This Amendment to the Kintera, Inc. 2000 Stock Option Plan (the “Plan”) is effective as of July 21, 2005.

 

Section 3.3 of the Plan is amended to add the following textas paragraph (j): 

 

“(j) to: (i) cancelOptions issued and outstanding on or prior to January 1, 2006 and that are not held by executive officers or Directors, and grant in substitution therefore new Options having a lower exercise price; and/or (ii) amend outstanding Options issued andoutstanding on or prior to January 1, 2006 and that are not held by executive officers or Directors, to reduce the exercise price thereof.” 

 

IN WITNESS OF THE FOREGOING, the undersigned Assistant Secretary of Kintera, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Corporation”), certifies thatthe foregoing amendment to the Kintera 2000 Stock Option Plan was duly adopted by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company on June 17, 2005 and approved by the stockholders of the Corporation on July 21, 2005.
Not for publication in West's Federal Reporter

Citation Limited Pursuant to 1st Cir. Loc. R. 32.3

United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

No. 03-1883

IRVING ORTIZ-PAGAN,

Plaintiff, Appellant,

v.

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant, Appellee.

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

[Hon. Carmen Consuelo Cerezo, U.S. District Judge]

Before

 Campbell, Senior Circuit Judge,

Torruella and Selya, Circuit Judges.

Salvador Medina de la Cruz on brief for appellant.

Robert J. Triba, Regional Chief Counsel, Social Security

Administration, H.S. Garcia, United States Attorney, Camille VelezRive, Assistant United States Attorney, on brief for appellee.

January 9, 2004
2

Per Curiam. After careful review of the briefs and

record on appeal, we affirm the decision below.

The appellant argues that the Commissioner erred in

failing to consult a vocational expert, given his nonexertional

impairments. However, such vocational evidence would have been

required only if the appellant's impairments had significantly

reduced his occupational base. Ortíz v. Sec'y of Health and Human

Serv., 890 F.2d 520 (1st Cir. 1989). The record contained

substantial evidence to support the Commissioner's determination

that the appellant retained the full capacity for light work.

Irlanda Ortiz v. Sec'y of Health and Human Serv., 955 F.2d 765 (1st

Cir. 1991). It was the Commissioner's prerogative to weigh the

evidence and resolve any conflicts. Rodríguez v. Sec'y of Health

and Human Serv., 647 F.2d 218 (1st Cir. 1981).

Affirmed. 1st Cir. R. 27(c).
AMENDMENT TO INDEPENDENT CONSULTANT

                              CONTRACT FOR SERVICES

         This Amendment to Independent Consultant Contract for Services (this
"Amendment") dated as of December 31, 2003, is made by and between SONOMAWEST
HOLDINGS, INC., a California corporation ("Client"), and DAVID J. BUGATTO
("Consultant") for the purpose of amending certain provisions of that
Independent Consultant Contract for Services dated as of July 17, 2001 between
the Client and Consultant (the "Contract").


                                    RECITALS

         WHEREAS, the parties hereto desire to amend the Contract in certain
respects and except as set forth herein, the Contract shall remain unchanged.

         NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants
set forth herein, the parties agree as follows:


                                    AGREEMENT

         SECTION A. TERM AND TERMINATION. The termination date of December 31,
2003 set forth in Section 5(a)(iii) of the Contract is hereby deleted and
replaced with June 30, 2004. All later references to the term in the Contract
shall hereinafter refer to this amount.

         SECTION B. EFFECT OF AMENDMENT. Except to the extent the Contract is
modified by this Amendment, the remaining terms and conditions of the Contract
shall remain unmodified and in full force and effect. In the event of conflict,
between the terms and conditions of the Contract and the terms and conditions of
this Amendment, the terms and conditions of this Amendment shall prevail and
control.

         SECTION C. COUNTERPARTS. This Amendment may be executed in one or more
counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original and all of which
together shall constitute one instrument.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Amendment to be duly
executed by its officers thereunto duly authorized as of the first date written
above.

  /s/ David J. Bugatto                       SONOMAWEST HOLDINGS, INC.,
----------------------------------           a California corporation
David J. Bugatto

                                             By:  /s/ Roger S. Mertz
                                             ----------------------------
                                             Name: Roger S. Mertz
                                             Title: Chairman of the Board
Exhibit 32.1











CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)








In connection with the Quarterly Report of Walgreen Co., an Illinois corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended February 28, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Gregory D. Wasson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge:





(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.














/s/ Gregory D. Wasson


Gregory D. Wasson


Chief Executive Officer


Dated:  April 5, 2011





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Walgreen Co. and will be retained by Walgreen Co. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Before the Second Division,

July 25, 1938

No. 39079.

#### Protest 448296-G of Brand & Corman, Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

The record established that certain items consist of articles in chief value of cellulose filaments similar to those involved in Abstract 37230. The claim at 60 percent under paragraph 31 was therefore sustained.
Exhibit 32

Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Chesapeake Funding LLC (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), George J. Kilroy, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Neil J. Cashen, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



|/s/ George J. KilroyGeorge J. Kilroy
Chief Executive Officer
May 14, 2004 |  | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|                                                                          |  | 
|/s/ Neil J. CashenNeil J. Cashen
Chief Financial Officer
May 14, 2004     |  | 

This
certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed
filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

---



QuickLinks
No. 48117.

#### Protests 969974-G, etc., of Quon & Quon Co. (Los Angeles).

*422Opinion by

Tilson, J,

It was stipulated that the merchandise in question consists of boxes, napkin rings, salt and pepper shakers, vases, cups, bowls, jars, letter openers, candy boxes, rulers, stamp boxes, trays, sets of seven pieces, snuff bottles, etc. Following Abstract 45722 the claim at 40 percent under paragraph 339 was sustained as to those items.
#### S. H. Pomerance Co., Inc. *v.*United States

No. 8040.

Entered-at New York, N. Y.

Entry No. 725291.

(Decided August 20, 1951)

*Siegel, Mandell & Davidson (Joshua M. Davidson*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*David N. Edelstein,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Lawrence, Judge:

It has been agreed between the parties hereto that the watch hands designated as item No. 605 and the issues involved in this appeal for reappraisement are similar in all material respects to the merchandise and issues involved in *Larsen Importing Corp.*v. *United States, 25*Cust. Ct. 366, Reap. Dec. 7855, and that the record in said case may be incorporated herein.

The parties have also agreed that on or about the date of exportation the merchandise here in controversy was freely offered for sale and sold for home consumption, and for exportation to the United States, to all purchasers in the principal markets of Switzerland, the country of exportation, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade at the unit invoice prices, plus the maj orations or increases as invoiced, less a quantity discount of 3 per centum, less a cash discount of 5 per centum, packed.

Upon the agreed facts, I find the foreign and export values, as those values are defined in section 402 (c) and (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Administrative Act of 1938 (19 U. S. C. § 1402 (c) and (d)), of the watch hands designated as item No. 605, to he the proper basis for determining the value of said merchandise and that such values are the unit invoice prices, plus the maj orations or increases as invoiced, less a quantity discount of 3 per centum, less a cash discount of 5 per centum, packed.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
<PAGE>   1
                       UGI UTILITIES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
        COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES - EXHIBIT 12.1
                             (THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                 Six
                                                Months
                                                Ended             Year Ended September 30,       
                                               March 31,  -------------------------------------- 
                                                1999       1998       1997      1996        1995
                                               -------    -------    -------    -------    -------
<S>                                            <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>    
EARNINGS:
Earnings before income taxes                   $59,864    $57,007    $63,275    $61,717    $39,759
Interest expense                                 8,656     17,383     16,696     15,921     16,632
Amortization of debt discount and expense          106        200        176        173        206
Interest component of rental expense               722      1,624      1,887      1,838      1,604
                                               -------    -------    -------    -------    -------
                                               $69,348    $76,214    $82,034    $79,649    $58,201
                                               =======    =======    =======    =======    =======
FIXED CHARGES:
Interest expense                               $ 8,656    $17,383    $16,696    $15,921    $16,632
Amortization of debt discount and expense          106        200        176        173        206
Allowance for funds used during
        construction (capitalized interest)         18         39        114        107         65
Interest component of rental expense               722      1,624      1,887      1,838      1,604
                                               -------    -------    -------    -------    -------
                                               $ 9,502    $19,246    $18,873    $18,039    $18,507
                                               =======    =======    =======    =======    =======
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                7.30       3.96       4.35       4.42       3.14
                                               =======    =======    =======    =======    =======
</TABLE>