alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
      31.1




CERTIFICATION




I,
      Ben
      Jamil, certify that:




1.
      I have
      reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Security Intelligence
      Technologies, Inc.;




2.
      Based
      on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
      fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
      in
      light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
      with respect to the period covered by this report;




3.
      Based
      on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
      included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
      condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
      for, the periods presented in this report;




4.
      The
      registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
      maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
      Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:




a)
      designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
      controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
      material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
      subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
      during the period in which this report is being prepared;




b)
      evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and
      procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
      of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
      by this report based on such evaluation; and




c)
      disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
      financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s first fiscal quarter
      that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
      the
      registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and




5.
      The
      registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
      recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
      registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of
      directors:




a)
      all
      significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
      of
      internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
      adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
      report financial information; and




b)
      any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
      who
      have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
      reporting.




Dated:  May
      21,
      2007




/s/
              Ben
              JamilBen
              Jamil, Chief Executive
              Officer
Search Help More Search Options

Search EERE Information Center 

## Distribution Transformers NOPR Analytical Spreadsheets The spreadsheets below provide the NOPR findings and interactive tools for the Engineering Analysis, the Life

- Cycle Cost Analysis, the National Impact Analysis, the Manufacturer Impact Analysis and Regulatory Impact Analysis. Instructions on how to use the Life

Cycle Cost Analysis and National Impact Analysis spreadsheets can be found in the Technical Support Document

. Engineering Analysis l Dry

- Type Engineering Analysis Results ( Excel 2.9 MB ) l Liquid Engineering Analysis Results ( Excel 4.7 MB ) Life Cycle Cost Calculations by Design Line Design Lines 1

- 5 are Liquid

- Immersed, Medium

- Voltage l Design Line 1: 50kVA, Single

- Phase ° LCC Analytical Spreadsheet ( Excel 8.8 MB ) l Design Line 2: 25kVA, Single

- Phase ° LCC Analytical Spreadsheet ( Excel 9.6 MB ) l Design Line 3: 500kVA, Single

- Phase ° LCC Analytical Spreadsheet ( Excel 8.5 MB ) l Design Line 4: 150kVA, Three

- Phase ° LCC Analytical Spreadsheet ( Excel 8.5 MB ) l Design Line 5: 1500kVA, Three

- Phase ° LCC Analytical Spreadhseet ( Excel 8.5 MB ) Design Lines 9

- 13 are Dry

- Type, Medium

- Voltage, Three

- Phase l Design Line 9: 300kVA, 20

- 45 kV BIL ° LCC Analytical Spreadsheet ( Excel 4.9 MB ) l Design Line 10: 1500kVA, 20

- 45 kV BIL ° LCC Analytical Spreadsheet ( Excel 4.9 MB ) l Design Line 11: 300kVA, 46

- 95 kV BIL ° LCC Analytical Spreadsheet ( Excel 5.1 MB ) l Design Line 12: 1500kVA, 46

- 95 kV BIL ° LCC Analytical Spreadsheet ( Excel 4.9 MB ) l Design Line 13: 2000kVA, 46

- 95 kV BIL ° LCC Analytical Spreadsheet ( Excel 4.9 MB ) National Impact Analysis l National Impact Analysis Spreadsheet ( Excel 7.1 MB )Manufacturer Impact Analysis l Government Regulatory Impact Model (GRIM) ( Excel 7.9 MB ) Regulatory Impact Analysis (RIA) l RIA Spreadsheet ( Excel 7.1 MB )

Printable Version

Webmaster | Security & Privacy | Building Technologies Program Home | EERE Home U.S. Department of Energy Content Last Updated: 08/08/2006
<PAGE>

                                                                EXHIBIT 23.1

                       [STOKES & COMPANY, P.C. LETTERHEAD]



                                  March 1, 2001


Solomon Alliance Group, Inc.
3025 Windward Plaza, Suite 300
Alpharetta, GA  30005

Gentlemen:

We consent to the use of our report dated March 1, 2001, with respect to the
financial statements of Solomon Alliance Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries that are
made part of this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB.


/s/ Stokes & Company, P.C.
--------------------------
Stokes & Company, P.C.


Washington, D.C.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

                                                     STATE OR OTHER JURISDICTION
                                                         OF INCORPORATION OR
                        NAME                                ORGANIZATION

       1.      ClassroomDirect.com, LLC                      Delaware
       2.      Childcraft Education Corp.                    New York
       3.      Bird-in-Hand Woodworks, Inc.                 New Jersey
       4.      Frey Scientific, Inc.                         Delaware
       5.      Sportime, LLC                                 Delaware
       6.      Sax Arts & Crafts, Inc.                       Delaware
       7.      Global Video, LLC                             Wisconsin
       9.      New School, Inc.                              Delaware
      10.      Premier Agendas, Inc.                        Washington
      11.      Premier School Agendas, Ltd.                   Canada
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v MELVIN L. DeWEES, Private, U. S. Army, Appellant

19 USCMA 571, 42 CMR 173

No. 22,932

July 17, 1970

*Colonel Daniel T. Ghent*and *Captain Bernard J. Casey*were on the pleadings for Appellant, Accused.

*Colonel David T. Bryant, Major Edwin P. Wasinger,*and *Captain Benjamin G. Porter*were on the pleadings for Appellee, United States.

Opinion of the Court

Quinn, Chief Judge:

The question presented by this appeal is whether error was committed by the military judge when he examined the sentence provision of a pretrial agreement between the accused and the convening authority. We considered this question in United States v Villa, 19 USCMA 564, 42 CMR 166 (1970), and for the reasons set out *572in our opinion in that case, we conclude there was no error.

The decision of the United States Army Court of Military Review is affirmed.

Judge DARDEN concurs.

FERGUSON, Judge

(dissenting) :

I dissent.

I disagree with my brothers’ decision in this case for the reasons set forth in my separate opinion in United States v Villa, 19 USCMA 564, 42 CMR 166 (1970).
Exhibit 32.1
                                                                    ------------


               CERTIFICATION BY THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF
                         COMPETITIVE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
                           PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                 THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)


         I, John B. Nano, am President and Chief Executive Officer of
Competitive Technologies, Inc. (the "Company").

         This certification is being furnished pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act") and 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in connection
with the filing of the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended January 31, 2005 (the "Report").

         I hereby certify that to the best of my knowledge:

         1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

         2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of the Company.


Date: March 17, 2005                          /s/ John B. Nano
                                              ------------------------------
                                              John B. Nano
                                              President and
                                              Chief Executive Officer of
                                              Competitive Technologies, Inc.
| || SiiiitT

3 0425 3956350 c

MECHANIZATION, EMPLOYMENT,
AND OUTPUT PER MAN IN

BITUMINOUS-COAL
MINING

WORK PROJECTS ADMINISTRATION
NATIONAL RESEARCH PROJECT ano
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

BUREAU OF MINES
No. 47629.

#### Protest 87437-K of Rogers Peet Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following *Bullocks*v. *United States*(6 Cust. Ct. 110, C. D. 441) the merchandise in question was held not subject to countervailing duty.
<TABLE> <S> <C>




<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>

THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
UNAUDITED FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS FOR THE THREE MONTH PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2000,
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

</LEGEND>


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          85,016
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  260,445
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    322,537
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               698,201
<PP&E>                                         344,286
<DEPRECIATION>                                 210,662
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,610,609
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,291,815
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,339
<OTHER-SE>                                     317,455
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,610,609
<SALES>                                        641,351
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               641,351
<CGS>                                          555,415
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  555,415
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               210,031
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (124,095)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (124,095)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (124,095)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0




</TABLE>
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 04547**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  04547\04547_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted x 04547\04547_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file x 04547\04547_PartB.xls Plant submitted survey file x 04547\04547_PartC.xls Plant submitted survey file x 04547\04547_PartD.xls Plant submitted survey file x 04547\04547_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file

04547\Certification Statement_04547.pdf Plant certification statement x 04547\SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION\04547_Question A5-2 map 1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

04547\SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION\04547_Question A5-2 map 2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 04547\SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION\04547_Question A5-3 WB-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 04547\SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION\04547_Question D2-3 Boron Removal System Pilot Test Results.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 04547\SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION\04547_Question D3-1 POND-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 04547\SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION\Question D3-1 WWT-1(a).pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 04547\04547_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

04547\04547_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.
**Exhibit      32.1**

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company                for the periods reflected therein. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                               |                                     |                                  |
|------------------------------------|------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------|
|                          |                                |                             |
| Date:              August 14, 2007 |                                          | /s/              Harvey B. Grossblatt |
|                               | Harvey              B. Grossblatt        |
|                               | Chief                  Executive Officer |

|         |                                   |                           |
|--------------|----------------------------------------|--------------------------------|
|    |                              |                      |
|              |                                        | /s/              James B. Huff |
|         | James              B. Huff             |
|         | Chief                Financial Officer |

----
RENDERED: JANUARY 20 , 2023; 10:00 A.M. NOT TO BE PUBLISHED 

# Commonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals

NO. 2021

- CA

- 0365

- MR

STEPHEN WILLIAM BARALT APPELLANT

v. APPEAL FROM SPENCER CIRCUIT COURT

HONORABLE S. MARIE HELLARD, JUDGE

ACTION NO. 13

- CI

- 00201

MELISSA MITCHELL BARALT APPELLEE

OPINION AFFIRMING
**   **  **
BEFORE: DIXON, LAMBERT, AND M C NEILL, JUDGES.
M C NEILL, JUDGE: T he parties in the present case were divorced by decree of the Spencer Circuit Court , Family Division, in 2015. They had minor children at the
time. According to A ppellant ’ s brief , he alleged over 1 , 000 individual instances of contempt of the underlying litigation. He suggested to the trial court in various
orders that he be awarded over $100,000 in attorneys ’ fees an d cost s, and that- 2

-

Appellee rectify her alleged parental alienation by submitting herself to counseling
and written apolog ies to the children.

In a handwritten order entered on January 26 , 20 2 1 , the family court
stated that all issues relating to attorneys ’ fees , contempt , etc., were previously
determined pursuant to the court’s December 7 , 2020 docket order . However, th e order further states that the motions for contempt and attorneys ’ fees were not preserved and that the court had previously determined all issues relating to the part ies’ children were moot. It is undisputed that t he children are now adults. In
another handwritten docket order entered on March 2, 2021 the court stated that the January 26 , 2021 order is final and appealable . Appellant appeals from that
order as a matter of right . For the following reasons, we affirm.
ANALYSIS
When a court exercises its contempt powers, it has nearly unlimited discretion

. Consequently, we will not disturb a court ’ s decision regarding contempt absent an abuse of its discretion

. The test for abuse of discretion is whether the trial [court ’ s] decision was arbitrary, unreasonable, unfair, or unsupported by sound legal principles. Meyers v. Petrie , 233 S.W.3d 212, 215 (Ky. App. 2007) (internal quotation mark s and citations omitted). Appellant cites to numerous portions of the record where
he filed motions for contempt . However, he has not raised any specific instance of alleged contempt or cited to any substantive ruling for this Court to review. It- 3

-

appears that his general argument is that the family court did not adequately
address his var ious motions , and that it also failed to do so in a timely manner. In any event, c onsidering the immense discretion afforded the circuit court and the record presented, we cannot conclude that the court abused its discretion here. Therefore, we affirm th e Spencer Circuit Court.

ALL CONCUR

.

BRIEF S FOR APPELLANT:
W. Steven Middleton Frankfort, Kentucky BRIEF FOR APPELLEE:
Kevin P. Fox Frankfort, Kentucky
c . -

OFFICE OF THE ATl’ ORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN

Honorable Oollea B. Yanaa County Attorney La eayaoIlty I mlr sir: oplnlon Boo. 01 RII Under the

**without** violating

0tiIlg the 0Q1ni08 8tloa read8 a8 SolArtialea 432438, Yoraea*m Aanatatod %nal aodr .we 

### the l ta t&a m

portalniog to aopotien in thio Stat& Yo’or the purp8err of th& opialon wa do aat deem i$ neaerrearp to quot. the80 Artlol*rr

0

### Phi8 **d&t&bat** 

### hae hsntiiorb 

### ruled on a quostlon

-8% ldeatioalm~# the one ~b8atOd in fwr inquiry and an dumwous.othsr qwstlona rlnllar to your que8tlon.

On July P, 1927, this depertmnt rendered an opia

### loa mitten by honorable 

### If. Qra Ohan4lbr AwirWn$ Atborne Oawal adbroomdto~, l&o lay, 0oua~J. Olo* Palnt x00

k Tam,' hlng thet a baunty oaanet appoint hi. uif* a8. ' d.mW. Oa April 26 1932, Shlr bpartwnt roadwed m oplnion writtbn by 8oaara 18 3bott tXia*# Airoistant Attommy #en6 bXW&, addn88Od t0 8r. ?tWf%&OW -8 boWIt AttOHbbl, hEtOr, Tome, hol6llag

tbta 8hhniff 3 I& ap~hhi8 800: a8 l d b p uy a h w iti t h t he a o n be no ahemp for hi8 8orvloea and 18 no manna, 4lrbotl~ or indiraatl~,out or or from **pPbll0** fond8 or rrrr of aifior or any kind or aharaot*r \Ifiat8cmter.

On Ramh 2, 

### 1932, this dbpWtmMt 

### held ln an O&Iion writtoa by &narable Brnoe %. Bryant, ?irst Assfrrtant Attbruoy

### Oenoral

a$ Taras, addreeubd ta HoIiorable Joe P. flaok Oouuty **Attoxyey** Mmud T0xa8 that it $8 not **a** vlalatlon 04 

### .th, tfbm$hB &Ii (kt&II uii Uid.433 PMbf %db.Ui 4O*a8) fw the WlTb of ha@ ahrrie an4 8ex aali*obo* to da ol&eel

**‘ theQh0** 



### 'I. y&ij&O~ .#& w# ri.p&kul~~rdVhb4 tb*t the 

### w y Oi a b b i

tic $u nr o o u nty a r m lo D l p p a ia t MSr im

a I dO R Ut b O o O?Jf O &b iki 0

to ty p s t&

fill y -xv y o u r

laqolrls 

### w e rb A. : Ya um v w y tr u ly

ATTOREEYGEUF&L OF TEXAS AWIlqp
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

This Certification accompanies the Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2006 of China BAK Battery, Inc. 

The undersigned, Xiangqian Li, the Chief Executive Officer and Yongbin Han, the Chief Financial Officer of China BAK Battery, Inc. (the “Company”), DO HEREBY CERTIFY that:

|   | 1.     | The   Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2006 (the “Report”),   fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities   Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
|   | 2.     | Information   contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the   financial condition and results of operation of the Company.                                                             |

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of theundersigned has executed this statement this 9th day of February2007.

| /s/   Xiangqian Li              |   |   |
|---------------------------------|--------|--------|
|                                 |   |   |
| Xiangqian Li                    |   |   |
| Chief   Executive Officer       |   |   |
| (Principal   Executive Officer) |   |   |
|                            |   |   |
| /s/ Yongbin   Han               |   |   |
|                                 |   |   |
| Yongbin Han                     |   |   |
| Chief   Financial Officer       |   |   |
| (Principal   Financial Officer) |   |   |

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to China BAK Battery, Inc. and will he retained by China BAK Battery, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

----
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER



I, Richard Davidson, Chief Financial Officer of Kintera, Inc. (the Registrant), do hereby certify in accordance
with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:



(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant, to which this certification is attached as an exhibit (the Report), fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



Date: August 15, 2005

|                             
|-----------------------------
|                             
|/s/ Richard Davidson         
|Richard Davidson             
|Chief Financial Officer      
|(Principal Financial Officer)