alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF KPMG LLP, INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of DirectorsSonoSite, Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 333-97973, 333-89518, 333-51820, 333-82739, 333-49401, 333-74833, 333-60112, 333-110913 and 333-124452) on Form S-8 and registration statements (Nos. 333-68610, 333-91083 and 333-83278) on Form S-3 of SonoSite, Inc. of our reports dated March 15, 2006, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of SonoSite, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the related consolidated statements of operations, cash flows and shareholders equity and comprehensive income (loss) for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2005 and the related financial statement schedule, managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005 and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, which reports appear in the December 31, 2005 annual report on Form
10-K of SonoSite, Inc.

> /s/ KPMG LLP

Seattle, WashingtonMarch 15, 2006

78

---
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 386 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 25 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 17), 2008 

Received 

OCTOBER 2 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 17), 2008 

Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Recognizing and celebrating the 232nd anniversary of the 

signing of the Declaration of Independence. 

Whereas the text of the Declaration of Independence was 

adopted by the Second Continental Congress on July 4, 

1776, and the engrossed copy of the Declaration of Independence was signed by most of the delegates in the Second Continental Congress on August 2, 1776; 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

HCON 386 RFS 

Whereas August 2, 2008, marks the 232d anniversary of the 

signing of the engrossed copy of the Declaration of Independence; 

Whereas the signing of the Declaration of Independence 

marked the formal dissolution of the ties of the thirteen 

American colonies with Great Britain, the beginning of 

their statehood and national identity, and the dawning of 

a new era of freedom in America and the world; 

Whereas these Founding Fathers, relying on the direction 

from and protection of Divine Providence, pledged to 

each other their lives, their fortunes, and their Sacred 

honor in defense of this action; 

Whereas the Declaration of Independence paved the way for 

the birth of the Republic; 

Whereas the Declaration of Independence has become part of 

the national culture, and its principles are part of the 

consciousness of all Americans; 

Whereas the fundamental genius of the United States is embodied in the Declaration’s recognition that ‘‘all men are 

created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator 

with certain unalienable rights, that among these are 

Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness’’; 

Whereas the principle that the rights of man are bestowed by 

the Creator and are unalienable was derived from Scripture, which antedates the existence from any government; 

Whereas the Declaration of Independence affirms that governments are instituted to protect those rights; and 

Whereas the Declaration acknowledged these self-evident 

Truths, which constituted one of the most revolutionary 

philosophical developments in history and began an unparalleled national experiment: Now, therefore, be it 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
3 

HCON 386 RFS 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That the Congress recognizes and celebrates 

3 the 232d anniversary of the signing of the Declaration of 

4 Independence. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 24 

(legislative day September 23), 2008. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED NOVEMBER 30, 1995 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-29-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1995
<CASH>                                      18,009,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                              273,696,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 2,199,000
<INVENTORY>                                156,039,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           458,515,000
<PP&E>                                     377,365,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             174,493,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             718,767,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      359,705,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                     8,006,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                 179,234,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               718,767,000
<SALES>                                  1,563,743,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         1,563,743,000
<CGS>                                    1,345,200,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              187,963,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          11,213,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             21,284,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 9,193,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         12,091,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                12,091,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.56
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.56
        

</TABLE>
Reap. Dec. 9039.

#### *F. L. Kramer & Co.*v. *United States.*

Entered at New York, N. Y. [Not published.] Motion by plamtiff.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of The PBSJ Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, John B. Zumwalt, III, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                  |  |     |  |                                  
|----------------- |  | --- |  | ---------------------------------
|February 14, 2005 |  | By: |  | /s/ John B. Zumwalt, III         
|                  |  |     |  | John B. Zumwalt, III             
|                  |  |     |  | Chairman, Chief Executive Officer
1 

### Sutton, Lisa

From: Brachtl, Megan

Sent: Friday, May 22, 2015 3:51 PM

To: Sutton, Lisa

Subject: FW: SSM SIP Call Final Action Notification to States

Megan V. Brachtl, Group Leader

State and Local Programs Group

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

(919) 541

‐ 2648

brachtl.megan@epa.gov

From: Daly, Carl

Sent: Friday, May 22, 2015 3:49 PM

To: Brachtl, Megan

Cc: Clark, Adam

Subject: WY: SSM SIP Call Final Action Notification to States

FYI

‐ WY

Carl Daly, Director

Air Program

303

‐ 312

‐ 6416

From: Daly, Carl

Sent: Friday, May 22, 2015 9:26 AM

To: Steve Dietrich

Cc: Monica Morales

Subject: SSM SIP Call Final Action Notification to States

Steve

This email is a follow

‐ up my update on the SAD call about the startup, shutdown, or malfunction (SSM) SIP

call. Wyoming will not be included in the SIP call as we have already addressed the SSM provisions that EPA was

petitioned on.

The information below is from headquarters.

The EPA Administrator signed a final action today to ensure states have in place air pollution rules that apply to sources

at all times, including during periods of startup, shutdown, or malfunction (SSM).

This action responds to a Petition for Rulemaking filed by the Sierra Club and WildEarth Guardians concerning the

treatment of excess emissions at industrial facilities during SSM operations, specifically how those emissions are treated

in state implementation plan (SIP) provisions that the EPA previously approved. Also, as part of this action, the EPA has

revised and clarified its policy concerning SSM provisions consistent with the Clean Air Act.2 Wyoming is not among those for which the EPA is issuing a SIP call to make changes to their SIPs because the EPA has

determined that the SIP provisions cited in the petition for your state are consistent with the Clean Air Act and EPA’s

current SSM Policy to the extent they are still part of your EPA–approved SIP.

For more detail on the agency’s final action, we have posted a pre

‐ publication version of the action on our website

at: http://www.epa.gov/airquality/ur banair/sipstatus/emissions.html

.

We look forward to continuing to work closely with you to ensure that any future revisions to your SIP are consistent

with the Clean Air Act and the EPA’s SSM policy.

Carl Daly, Director

Air Program

303

‐ 312

‐ 6416
Before the Third Division,

May 2, 1950

No. 54299.

#### A. Millner Co. *v.*United States,

protest 151290-K (New York).

*449Opinion by

Cline, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of laurel leaves similar in all material respects to those the subject of *The Levy & Levis Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(23 Cust. Ct. 8, C. D. 1180), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 42006.

#### Protest 306764-G of Saks & Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel atomizers, trays, bookends, bottles, boxes, and flaeons chiefly used in the household for utilitarian purposes were held dutiable at 40 percent under paragraph 339. *United States*v. *Friedlaender*(21 C. C. P. A. 103, T. D. 46445), *Dow*v. *United States*(id 282, T. D. 46816), *Rice*v. *United States*(T. D. 49373), and Abstract 39787 cited.
February 11, 1942

No. 46957.

Suit 4356.

#### Hummel *Chemical Co.*v. *United States.*

C. D. 437 affirmed. C. A. D. 189.
No. 54303.

#### Harmar Company *v.*United States,

protest 111640-K (Louisville).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise and issues are the same in all material respects as those involved in *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C. D. 1155), and further that the gauge for internal revenue tax purposes on barrel No. 402 should be 31.8 proof gallons. Following the decision cited the collector was directed to reliquidate the entry and refund all duties taken upon quantities in excess of the quantities upon which internal revenue taxes were finally assessed, and as to barrel No. 402, to assess the internal revenue tax at the appropriate rate upon 31.8 proof gallons.
# C_2019288EN.01004201.xml

| 26.8.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 288/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.8.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 288/42

---

Judgment of the General Court of 19 June 2019 — Ja zum Nürburgring v Commission

(Case T-373/15) (1)

(State aid - Individual aid in favour of the Nürburgring complex for the construction of a leisure park, hotels and restaurants as well as for the organisation of motor races - Decision finding the aid to be incompatible with the internal market - Decision finding that the reimbursement of the aid found to be incompatible does not concern the new owner of the Nürburgring complex - Action for annulment - No substantial effect on competitive position - Association - Status of negotiator - Inadmissibility - Decision finding no State aid after the preliminary examination stage - Action for annulment - Interested party - Legal interest in bringing an action - Admissibility - Breach of procedural rights of interested parties - No difficulties that would have required the initiation of a formal investigation procedure - Complaint - Sale of the assets of the beneficiaries of the State aid found to be incompatible - Open, transparent, non-discriminatory and unconditional tender process - Obligation to state reasons - Principle of sound administration)

(2019/C 288/54)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Ja zum Nürburgring eV (Nürburg, Germany) (represented initially by D. Frey, M. Rudolph and S. Eggerath, and subsequently by D. Frey and M. Rudolph, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by L. Flynn, T. Maxian Rusche and B. Stromsky, Agents)

Re:

Action pursuant to Article 263 TFEU seeking the partial annulment of Commission Decision (EU) 2016/151 of 1 October 2014 on the State aid SA.31550 (2012/C) (ex 2012/NN) implemented by Germany for Nürburgring (OJ 2016 L 34, p. 1).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Orders that the application for a decision that there is no need to adjudicate on the action be dismissed; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Orders that the application for a decision that there is no need to adjudicate on the action be dismissed;

| 2. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the action;

| 3. | Orders Ja zum Nürburgring eV to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Ja zum Nürburgring eV to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 337, 12.10.2015.

---
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Collective Bargaining Clauses: Labor-Management Safety, Production, and Industry Stabilization Committees

              																	Platt, Robert, 1916-					 and 	Weiss, Dena G. 						*Collective Bargaining Clauses: Labor-Management Safety, Production, and Industry Stabilization Committees : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 1201*,												Washington, D.C: 								U.S. Dept. of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, 										December 1956,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/4496,			accessed on September 25, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
```

[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 9 (Friday, January 13, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 4450]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-00699]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Tenth RTCA SC-229 406 MHz ELT Plenary Joint With WG-98; 
Correction

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA).

ACTION: Notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Aviation Administration published a document in 
the Federal Register of January 9, 2017, concerning the Tenth RTCA SC-
229 406 MHz ELT Plenary Joint with WG-98. The document contained the 
incorrect location.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rebecca Morrison at rmorrison@rtca.org 
or 202-330-0654, or The RTCA Secretariat, 1150 18th Street NW., Suite 
910, Washington, DC 20036, or by telephone at (202) 833-9339, fax at 
(202) 833-9434, or Web site at http://www.rtca.org.

Correction

    In Federal Register, of January 9, 2017, in FR doc Vol. 82, No. 5, 
on page 2435 in Column 3 Correct the caption ADDRESS to read:

ADDRESSES:  The meeting will be held at: E.A.S.A., Konrad-Adenauer-Ufer 
3, D-50668 Cologne, Germany.

    Dated: January 10, 2017.
Mohannad Dawoud,
Management & Program Analyst, Partnership Contracts Branch, ANG-A17, 
NextGen, Procurement Services Division, Federal Aviation 
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2017-00699 Filed 1-12-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
No. 6328.

#### UNITED STATES FIRE INSURANCE CO. vs. FRED. G. MEYER, ET AL.

Syllabus.

One who has a lien only in the insured property has no claim to the insurance money realized by the insured in the event . of a loss of the property, for a claim on the insurance money can only arise out of a contract.

Appeal from the Civil District Court for the Parish of Orleans, Division “C,” No. 106,368. Honorable E. K. Skinner, Judge.

*249Caffery, Quintero & Brumby, for plaintiff and appellee.

A. J. Rossi, for defendant and appellant.

J. B. Rosser, Jr., attorney.

Thomas Brown, in p. p.

His Honor, JOHN ST. PAUL,

rendered the opinion and decree of the Court, as follows:

Defendant, Meyer, insured his building then in course of construction, the policy also covering building materials in and around the premises.

Being in need of money to carry on the construction, he borrowed of Mrs. J. D. Taylor $1,500, and to secure the same mortgaged the premises and had the policy made payable to the holder of the mortgage note.

When the building was practically completed it was destroyed by fire, and the loss was adjusted and about to be paid to Mrs. Taylor. But the Crescent City Manufacturing Company put in a claim for the proceeds asserting a lien upon the building for materials furnished.

This concursus then followed.

The trial Judge rejected the claim of the C- C. Manfg.

■Co., on the ground that its lien was not recorded within seven days as required by law, C. C., 3174, which was a fact.

It is claimed that Mrs. Taylor was not a third, party to' the construction going on; but this claim is founded neither on fact nor in law. Mrs. Taylor simply lent her money and had no concern with the use to which Meyer intended to put it. Nor yet would the fact that she had loaned her money to'Meyer even for the express purpose of paying for material and labor to construct a building make her a party to his purchases and contracts on that score. She was a third party to all of these.

*250Opinion and decree, March 15th, 1915.

Moreover, the claim, of the ’C. C. Mnfg. Co. is evidently founded upon the theory that the proceeds of .an-insurance policy stand in lieu of the property destroyed, and that liens upon the property attach to such proceeds.

But this is erroneous. Our Supreme Court has three times decided to the contrary.

Thayer vs. Goodale, 4 La., 221; Eymar vs. Laurence, 8 La., 38; Slark vs. Broom, 7 An., 337.

The Cyclopedia of Law and Procedure (Cyc-, Vol. 19, p. 887) thus lays down the rule, supporting it by abundant authority:

> ‘ ‘ One who has a lien only on the insured property has no claim to the insurance money realized by the insured in the event of a loss of the property, for a claim on the insurance money can only arise out of a contract. ’ ’

Judgment affirmed.
#### Inter-Maritime Fwdg. Co., Inc. *v.*United States

No. 6767.

Entry No. 705114, etc.

Invoices dated Hawick, Scotland, May 23, 1941, etc.

Certified May 23, 1941, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., July 24, 1941, etc.

(Decided January 15, 1947)

*Tompkins & Tompkins (J. Stuart Tompkins*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Cole, Judge (Abstract):

These appeals for reappraisement of various items of merchandise concern the so-called British purchase tax, described in the law of the United Kingdom entitled, “Finance (No. 2) Act 1940 3 & 4 Geo. 6 Ch. 48.” The said tax was held not to be an item to be included in foreign value as defined in section 402 (c) of the Tariff Act of .1930 as amended by the Customs Administrative Act of 1938 (19 U. S. C. § 1402 (e)). *United States*v. *Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp.,*33 C. C. P. A. 183, C. A. D. 334.

A written stipulation of fact, submitting these eases, is sufficient to show that export value, section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. § 1402 (d)), is the proper basis for appraisement of the instant merchandise, and that such statutory values for the articles in question are the appraised values, less additions made by the importer on entry because of advances in similar cases.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 

          - [RT01-99-000, RT01-99-001, RT01-99-002 and RT01-99-003; RT01-86-000, RT01-86-001 and RT01-86-002; RT01-95-000, RT01-95-001 and RT01-95-002; RT01-2-000, RT01-2-001, RT01-2-002 and RT01-2-003; RT01-98-000; RT02-3-000] 

Take notice that PJM Interconnection, L.L.C., New York Independent System Operator, Inc. and ISO New England, Inc. have posted on their internet websites information updating their progress on the resolution of RTO seams. 

Any person desiring to file comments on this information should file with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such comments should be filed on or before the comment date. Comments may be filed electronically via the Internet in lieu of paper; see 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web site under the “e-Filing” link. The Commission strongly encourages electronic filings. 

*Comment Date:*                     May 16, 2007.                 

Kimberly D. Bose, 

Secretary.

 [FR Doc. E7-8332 Filed 5-1-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P