alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                           |   | Three      Months Ended November 30, |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                           |   | 2008                                 |   |   | 2007 |   |
| Income      before income taxes and minority interest          |   | $                                    | 654    |   |   | $ | 728 |   |
| Add:                                                           |   |                                 |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Minority      interest                                         |   |                                 | -      |   |   |   | - |   |
| Fixed      charges                                             |   |                                 | 237    |   |   |   | 204 |   |
| Less:      Capitalized interest                                |   |                                 | (5     | ) |   |   | (7 | ) |
|    Earnings      as defined                     |   | $                                    | 886    |   |   | $ | 925 |   |
|                                                           |   |                                 |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Interest      expense, net of capitalized interest             |   |                                 | 16     |   |   | $ | 2 |   |
| Capitalized      interest                                      |   |                                 | 5      |   |   | $ | 7 |   |
| Portions      of rentals representative of the interest factor |   |                                 | 216    |   |   |   | 195 |   |
|    Fixed      charges as defined                |   | $                                    | 237    |   |   | $ | 204 |   |
|                                                           |   |                                 |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Ratio      of earnings to fixed charges                        |   |                                 | 3.74   |   |   |   | 4.53 |   |
#### F. C. Gerlach & Co. *v.*United States

No. 6476.

Entry Nos. 750956; 762392.

Invoices dated Carlisle, England, March 7, 1946, etc.

Certified March 14, 1946, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., April 9, 1946, etc.

(Decided October 29, 1946)

*Brooks & Brooks*for thg plaintiff.

*Paul P. Kao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Kinoheloe, Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is. defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
```

[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 14 (Tuesday, January 23, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 2871]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-893]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Air Force

Establishment and Operation of an Intelligence, Surveillance, 
Reconnaissance, and Strike Capability, Andersen Air Force Base, Guam

AGENCY: Department of the Air Force.

ACTION: Record of Decision (ROD).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On January 12, 2007, the United States Air Force signed the 
ROD for the Establishment and Operation of an Intelligence, 
Surveillance, Reconnaissance, and Strike Capability, Andersen Air Force 
Base, Guam. The decision was based on matters discussed in the Final 
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), inputs from the public and 
regulatory agencies, and other relevant factors. The Final EIS was made 
available on November 24, 2006 in the Federal Register (Volume 71, 
Number 226, Page 67864) with a wait period ending December 26, 2006. 
The Air Force was the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) lead 
agency with the Department of the Navy acting as a Cooperating Agency 
under NEPA. The ROD documents only the decision of the Air Force with 
respect to the proposed Air Force actions analyzed in the Final EIS.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION: Jonathan Wald, 36 Civil Engineer Squadron, 
671-366-2549.

Bao-Anh Trinh,
DAF, Air Force Federal Register Liaison Officer.
 [FR Doc. E7-893 Filed 1-22-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-05-P
```
[Cite as Abdulrahaman v. S. Ohio Correctional Facility, 2009-Ohio-7099.]

Court of Claims of Ohio

The Ohio Judicial Center 

65 South Front Street, Third Floor 

Columbus, OH 43215 

614.387.9800 or 1.800.824.8263 

www.cco.state.oh.us

ABDUL ABDULRAHAMAN 

 Plaintiff 

 v. 

SOUTHERN OHIO CORRECTIONAL FACILITY 

 Defendant 

 

Case No. 2007-01274 

Judge J. Craig Wright 

Magistrate Steven A. Larson 

JUDGMENT ENTRY

{¶ 1} On November 25, 2009, the magistrate issued a decision recommending 

judgment for defendant. 

{¶ 2} Civ.R. 53(D)(3)(b)(i) states, in part: “A party may file written objections to 

a magistrate’s decision within fourteen days of the filing of the decision, whether or not 

the court has adopted the decision during that fourteen-day period as permitted by 

Civ.R. 53(D)(4)(e)(i).” No objections were filed. 

{¶ 3} The court determines that there is no error of law or other defect evident 

on the face of the magistrate’s decision. Therefore, the court adopts the magistrate’s 

decision and recommendation as its own, including findings of fact and conclusions of 

law contained therein. Judgment is rendered in favor of defendant. Court costs are 

assessed against plaintiff. The clerk shall serve upon all parties notice of this judgment 

and its date of entry upon the journal. 

 
Case No. 2007-01274 - 2 - JUDGMENT ENTRY

 

 _____________________________________ 

 J. CRAIG WRIGHT 

 Judge 

cc: 

 

Amy S. Brown 

Emily M. Simmons 

Assistant Attorneys General 

150 East Gay Street, 18th Floor 

Columbus, Ohio 43215-3130 

Magistrate Steven A. Larson 

Abdul Abdulrahaman, #487-773 

Southern Ohio Correctional Facility 

P.O. Box 45699 

Lucasville, Ohio 45699 

HTS/cmd

Filed December 17, 2009 

To S.C. reporter January 19, 2010
---

Exhibit 99.16

Summary of Loan Agreement Entered into by and between Shenzhen BAK Battery Co., Ltd.

(the Company) and Longgang Branch, Shenzhen Development Bank Co., Ltd

(the Creditor) on January 4, 2010

Main contents:

- Contract number: Shenfa Longgang Daizi 20091230002;
- Main Contract: Comprehensive Credit Facility Agreement;
- Main Contract number: Shenfa Longgang Zongzidi 20091221001;
- Loan principal: RMB 60 million;
- Loan term: from January 4, 2010 to January 4 , 2011;
- Floating interest rate: Interest rate of loan shall be 95% of the benchmark rate announced by the Peoples Bank of China, and be adjusted every 3 months;

> Interest accrued and settled per month, interest settlement day is the 20thday of each month;
>       Penalty interest rate for delayed repayment: current interest rate plus 50% * current interest rate;
>       Penalty interest rate for embezzlement of loan proceeds: current interest rate *1;

- Purpose of the loan is to provide working capital for the Company;
- If any of the following occurs, the Creditor is entitled to demand prepayment of loan principal and interest before maturity and cancel all loans unprovided ;

> The Company terminates operation or is stopped from operation;
>       The Company provides untrue documents or hide important
> financial
> information about its operation;
>       The Company intentionally evades bank debts by way of related party
> transaction or other means;
>       The Company uses loan proceeds for purposes other than what is agreed
> without the consent of the Creditor;
>       Occurrence of other instances which endangers or may endanger the
> safety of the loan provided by the Creditor;

Headlines of the articles omitted:

- Interest clearing of the loan
- Payment of the loan
- Rights and obligation of the Company
- Rights and obligations of the Creditor
- Disputation settlement and Validity
- Fees
- Breach of contract penalties
- Declaration, guaranty and undertaking of the Company
- Amendment and Termination of Contract
- Others
- Text

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0461

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

NICOLE ABENICIA NOLI,

Defendant and Appellant.

GRANT

Pursuant to authority granted under Mont. R. App. P. 26(1), the 

Appellant is given an extension of time until January 6, 2021, to 

prepare, file, and serve the Appellant’s opening brief. 

Electronically signed by:

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of the Supreme Court

November 30 2020

11/30/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0461
January 29, 1940

No. 43143.

Suit 4222.

#### Louis *Wolf & Co.*v. *United States.*

C. D. 48 affirmed.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-41441

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ABEL RODRIGUEZ-RODRIGUEZ,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:15-CR-796-1

Before REAVLEY, ELROD, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Abel Rodriguez-Rodriguez

raises an argument that is foreclosed by United States v. Rodriguez, 711 F.3d 

541, 562-63 & n.28 (5th Cir. 2013) (en banc), in which we held that the generic, 

contemporary definition of sexual abuse of a minor does not require the age of 

consent to be below 17 years old and does not include an age-differential 

requirement. He also raises an argument that is foreclosed by United States 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 16, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 15-41441 Document: 00513639102 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/16/2016
No. 15-41441

2

v. Elizondo-Hernandez, 755 F.3d 779, 781-82 (5th Cir. 2014), which held that 

the Texas offense of indecency with a child by contact satisfied the generic 

definition of sexual abuse of a minor. Accordingly, the motion for summary 

affirmance is GRANTED, the alternative motion for an extension of time to file 

a brief is DENIED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

 Case: 15-41441 Document: 00513639102 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/16/2016
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Surface Transportation Board 

          - [STB Finance Docket No. 35022] 

New Hampshire Central Railroad, Inc. (NHCR), a Class III rail carrier, has filed a verified notice of exemption under 49 CFR 1150.41 to acquire by lease and to operate approximately 8.47 miles of rail line owned by the State of New Hampshire Department of Transportation on the Mountain Division corridor, between Engineering Station 5060+25, Valuation Section 17 NH Map 53, in Whitefield, NH, and Station 5503, Valuation Section 18 VT Map 3, in Lunenburg, VT. 

NHCR certifies that its projected revenues as a result of this transaction will not result in the creation of a Class II or a Class I rail carrier and will not exceed $5 million. 

The earliest this transaction may be consummated is June 1, 2007, the effective date of the exemption (30 days after the exemption was filed). 

                    If the notice contains false or misleading information, the exemption is void                     *ab initio*. Petitions to revoke the exemption under 49 U.S.C. 10502(d) may be filed at any time. The filing of a petition to revoke will not automatically stay the transaction. Petitions for stay must be filed no later than May 25, 2007 (at least 7 days before the exemption becomes effective).                 

An original and 10 copies of all pleadings, referring to STB Finance Docket No. 35022, must be filed with the Surface Transportation Board, 395 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20423-0001. Also, a copy of each pleading must be served on Jack E. Dodd, P.O. Box 28, Saint Albans, VT 05478. 

                    Board decisions and notices are available on our Web site at                     *http://www.stb.dot.gov*.                 

Decided: May 8, 2007. 

By the Board, David M. Konschnik, Director, Office of Proceedings. 

Vernon A. Williams, 

Secretary.

[FR Doc. E7-9203 Filed 5-14-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4915-01-P
Exhibit 31.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Chris R. Decker, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Security Intelligence
Technologies, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

      a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
      disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
      to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
      its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
      prepared;

      b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
      procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
      effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
      the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

      c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
      control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
      first fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely
      to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
      reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors:

      a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
      operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial information; and

      b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
      over financial reporting.

Dated: November 20, 2006

                                        /s/ Chris R. Decker
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Chris R. Decker, Chief Financial Officer


                                       23
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                  <C>                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                        3-MOS                    YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                       MAR-31-2000             DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                 33,948                  30,204
<SECURITIES>                                0                  41,201
<RECEIVABLES>                               0                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                 0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                    3,913,898               4,009,014
<PP&E>                                      0                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                              0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      3,947,846               4,080,419
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               1,311,773               1,403,923
<BONDS>                                     0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0                       0
<COMMON>                                    0                       0
<OTHER-SE>                          2,636,073               2,676,496
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>        3,947,846               4,080,419
<SALES>                                     0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          485                       0
<CGS>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               0                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                       26,716                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                       (26,231)                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                   (14,192)                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                              0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0                       0
<CHANGES>                                   0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                          (40,423)                      0
<EPS-BASIC>                                 0                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                               0                       0


</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED June 22, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-51355 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus ALEJANDRO ZALAZAR-TORRES, also known as Raul Garcia-Miranda, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. EP-03-CR-1149-ALL-PM

-------------------- Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Court-appointed counsel for Alejandro Zalazar-Torres has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed two briefs pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Zalazar-Torres has filed a responsive brief. Our review of the briefs as well as our review of the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.
Order entered December 19 , 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 19
- 01191
- CV
HENRY STEPHENSON BYR D, MD, ET AL, Appellant s V. ROLANDA HUTTON AND B RYAN HUTTON, Appel lee s On Appeal from the 14th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC
- 17
- 15886



### O RDER Before the Court is appellants’ December 16, 2019 unopposed motion for an eighteen

day extension of time to file their opening brief. We G RANT the motion and extend the time to January 3, 2020

.
/s/ BILL WHITEHILL JUSTICE
SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

Case No. 6D2023-0169

Lower Tribunal Nos. 15CF-211 and 15-CF-000718

_____________________________

J. PATRICK BUCKLEY,

Appellant, 

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lee County.

Nicholas Thompson, Judge.

August 20, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

STARGEL, SMITH and BROWNLEE, JJ., concur.

Robert David Malove, of The Law Office of Robert David Malove, P.A., Fort 

Lauderdale, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Taylor A. Schell, Assistant 

Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING 

AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED
|  EXHIBIT 32.1                               |
|--------------------------------------------------|
|  Union Carbide Corporation and Subsidiaries |
|                                             |

| 1. | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Corporation for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation. |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/ PATRICK E. GOTTSCHALK                                  |   |   |
|------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
| Patrick E. GottschalkPresident and Chief Executive Officer |   |   |
| Date: May 4, 2011                                          |   |   |

----