26426 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 89 / Wednesday, May 9, 2007 / Notices 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

[TA–W–61,177] 

Bartech Group, Inc., Including Workers 

of Continental Design and Engineering 

and Manpower, Anderson, IN; Notice of 

Termination of Investigation 

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade 

Act of 1974, as amended, an 

investigation was initiated on March 26, 

2007 in response to a petition filed on 

behalf of workers of Bartech Group, Inc., 

including workers of Continental Design 

and Engineering and Manpower, 

Anderson, Indiana. 

The petitioning group of workers is 

covered by an active certification (TA–

W–60,858 as amended) which expires 

on February 2, 2009. Consequently, 

further investigation in this case would 

serve no purpose, and the investigation 

has been terminated. 

Signed at Washington, DC this 2nd day of 

May 2007. 

Richard Church, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade 

Adjustment Assistance. 

[FR Doc. E7–8824 Filed 5–8–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

[TA-W–61,104] 

Bay State Circuits, Inc.; Millbury, MA; 

Notice of Termination of Investigation 

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade 

Act of 1974, as amended, an 

investigation was initiated on March 13, 

2007, in response to a worker petition 

filed by a company official on behalf of 

workers of Bay State Circuits, Inc., 

Millbury, Massachusetts. 

The petitioner has requested that the 

petition be withdrawn. Consequently, 

the investigation has been terminated. 

Signed in Washington, DC, this 1st day of 

May 2007. 

Linda G. Poole, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade 

Adjustment Assistance. 

[FR Doc. E7–8828 Filed 5–8–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

[TA–W–60,858] 

Delphi Corporation, Automotive 

Holdings Group Including Leased 

Workers of Bartech Group, Inc., 

Manpower and Continental Design and 

Engineering Working On-Site at 

Delphi; Anderson, IN; Amended 

Certification Regarding Eligibility To 

Apply for Worker Adjustment 

Assistance and Alternative Trade 

Adjustment Assistance 

In accordance with Section 223 of the 

Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2273), and 

Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974 (26 

U.S.C. 2813), as amended, the 

Department of Labor issued a 

Certification of Eligibility to Apply for 

Worker Adjustment Assistance and 

Alternative Trade Adjustment 

Assistance on February 2, 2007, 

applicable to workers of Delphi 

Corporation, Automotive Holdings 

Group, Anderson, Indiana. The notice 

was published in the Federal Register 

on February 14, 2007 (72 FR 7087). 

At the request of the petitioners, the 

Department reviewed the certification 

for workers of the subject firm. The 

workers are engaged in the production 

of automotive ignition products. 

New information shows that leased 

workers of Bartech Group, Inc., 

Manpower and Continental Design and 

Engineering were employed on-site at 

the Anderson, Indiana location of 

Delphi Corporation, Automotive 

Holdings Group. 

Based on these findings, the 

Department is amending this 

certification to include leased workers 

of Bartech Group, Inc., Manpower and 

Continental Design and Engineering 

working on-site at the Anderson, 

Indiana location of the subject firm. 

The intent of the Department’s 

certification is to include all workers 

employed on-site at Delphi Corporation, 

Automotive Holdings Group, Anderson, 

Indiana who were adversely affected by 

a shift in production to Mexico. 

The amended notice applicable to 

TA–W–60,858 is hereby issued as 

follows: 

‘‘All workers of Delphi Corporation, 

Automotive Holdings Group, including 

leased workers of Bartech Group, Inc., 

Manpower and Continental Design and 

Engineering, Anderson, Indiana, who became 

totally or partially separated from 

employment on or after January 23, 2006, 

through February 2, 2009, are eligible to 

apply for adjustment assistance under 

Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, and are 

also eligible to apply for alternative trade 

adjustment assistance under Section 246 of 

the Trade Act of 1974.’’

Signed at Washington, DC, this 1st day of 

May 2007. 

Richard Church, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade 

Adjustment Assistance. 

[FR Doc. E7–8826 Filed 5–8–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

[TA–W–53,648] 

International Business Machines 

Corporation, Tulsa, OK; Notice of 

Revised Determination on Remand 

On March 30, 2007, the United States 

Court of International Trade (USCIT) 

remanded to the Department of Labor 

(Department) for further investigation 

Former Employees of International 

Business Machines Corporation v. U.S. 

Secretary of Labor, Court No. 04–00079. 

In accordance with Section 223 of the 

Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 

U.S.C. 2273), the Department herein 

presents the results of the remand 

investigation regarding workers’

eligibility to apply for worker 

adjustment assistance. 

The initial investigation to determine 

the eligibility of workers of International 

Business Machines Corporation (IBM), 

Tulsa, Oklahoma (subject firm) to apply 

for Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) 

was initiated on November 26, 2003 in 

response to a worker-filed petition. The 

Department’s initial negative 

determination, issued on December 2, 

2003 and published in the Federal 

Register on January 16, 2004 (69 FR 

2622), was based on finding that the 

workers did not produce an article 

within the meaning of Section 222 of 

the Trade Act of 1974. 

The petitioners requested 

administrative reconsideration of the 

negative determination on February 6, 

2004. By letter dated February 11, 2004, 

the petitioners also sought judicial 

review of the negative determination. 

On March 30, 2004, the USCIT granted 

the Department’s request for voluntary 

remand in order to issue a finding 

pursuant to the request for 

reconsideration. 

The Department issued a negative 

determination on the request for 

reconsideration on March 31, 2004. The 

Department’s Notice of determination 

was published in the Federal Register 

on April 16, 2004 (69 FR 20644). The 

determination was based on findings 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 89 / Wednesday, May 9, 2007 / Notices 26427 

that the workers’ firm did not produce 

an article within the meaning of Section 

222 of the Trade Act and that the 

workers did not provide services in 

direct support of an affiliated TAA 

certified firm. 

On May 14, 2004, the Department 

filed its second consent motion for 

voluntary remand. The Department 

issued a negative determination on 

remand on August 2, 2004. The 

Department’s Notice of determination 

was published in the Federal Register 

on August 10, 2004 (69 FR 48527). The 

determination was based on findings 

that the workers at the subject facility 

did not produce or support the 

production of an article by IBM and 

were not under the control of BP. On 

December 2, 2005, the USCIT remanded 

the matter to the Department. 

On February 6, 2006, the Department 

issued a second negative determination 

on remand. The Department’s Notice of 

determination was published in the 

Federal Register on March 2, 2006 (71 

FR 10709). The Department’s 

determination was based on findings 

that the criteria developed by the 

Department to determine the extent to 

which a worker group engaged in 

activities related to the production of an 

article by a producing firm was under 

the control of the producing firm had 

not been met. On March 30, 2007, the 

USCIT remanded the matter to the 

Department. 

The Department has determined after 

further review that during the relevant 

period, a significant number or 

proportion of the subject worker group 

was separated and that the subject 

worker group was working in support 

of, and under sufficient control of 

import impacted BP production 

facilities, whose workers were certified 

as eligible for TAA. 

Conclusion 

Based on review of the record 

evidence, I determine that BP controlled 

the subject worker group and that 

increased imports of articles like or 

directly competitive with crude oil 

produced by an affiliated facility which 

the subject worker group supported, 

contributed to the total or partial 

separation of a significant number or 

proportion of workers at the subject 

facility. 

In accordance with the provisions of 

the Act, I make the following 

certification: 

‘‘All workers of International Business 

Machines Corporation, Tulsa, Oklahoma, 

who became totally or partially separated 

from employment on or after November 26, 

2002, through two years from the issuance of 

this revised determination, are eligible to 

apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance under 

Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974.’’

Signed at Washington, DC this 2nd day of 

May 2007. 

Elliott S. Kushner, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade 

Adjustment Assistance. 

[FR Doc. E7–8825 Filed 5–8–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Mine Safety and Health Administration 

Proposed Information Collection 

RequestSubmitted for Public Comment 

and Recommendations; Safety 

Defects, Examination, Correction, and 

Records 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Labor, as 

part of its continuing effort to reduce 

paperwork and respondent burden, 

conducts a preclearance consultation 

program to provide the general public 

and Federal agencies with an 

opportunity to comment on proposed 

and/or continuing collections of 

information in accordance with the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 

(PRA95) [44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)]. This 

program helps to ensure that requested 

data can be provided in the desired 

format, reporting burden (time and 

financial resources) is minimized, 

collection instruments are clearly 

understood, and the impact of collection 

requirements on respondents can be 

properly assessed. 

DATES: Submit comments on or before 

July 9, 2007. 

ADDRESSES: Send comments to U.S. 

Department of Labor, Mine Safety and 

Health Administration, Debbie Ferraro, 

Management Services Division, 1100 

Wilson Boulevard, Room 2171, 

Arlington, VA 22209–3939. Commenters 

are encouraged to send their comments 

on a computer disk, or via E-mail to 

Ferraro.Debbie@dol.gov, along with an 

original printed copy. Ms. Ferraro can 

be reached at (202) 693–9821 (voice), or 

(202) 693–9801 (facsimile). 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Contact the employee listed in the 

ADDRESSES section of this notice. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Background 

Title 30 CFR 56.13015 and 57.13015 

require that compressed-air receivers 

and other unfired pressure vessels be 

inspected by inspectors holding a valid 

National Board Commission and in 

accordance with the applicable chapters 

of the National Board Inspection Code, 

a manual for Boiler and Pressure Vessels 

Inspectors, 1979. 

Title 30 CFR 56.13030 and 57.13030 

require that fired pressure vessels 

(boilers) be equipped with safety 

devices approved by the American 

Society of Mechanical Engineers 

(ASME) to protect against hazards from 

overpressure, flameouts, fuel 

interruptions and low water level. 

Sections 56/57.13030 requires that 

records of inspections and repairs be 

retained by the mine operator in 

accordance with the requirements of the 

ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code 

and the National Board Inspection Code 

(progressive records—no limit on 

retention time) and made available to 

the Secretary or his/her authorized 

representative. 

Title 30 CFR 56.14100 and 57.14100 

require equipment operators to inspect 

equipment, machinery, and tools that 

are to be used during a shift for safety 

defects before the equipment is placed 

in operation. Defects affecting safety are 

required to be corrected in a timely 

manner. In instances where the defect 

makes continued operation of the 

equipment unsafe, the standards require 

removal from service, tagging to identify 

that it is out of use, and repair before 

use is resumed. 

Title 30 CFR 56.18002 and 57.180002 

require that a competent person 

designated by the operator shall 

examine each working place at least 

once each shift for conditions which 

may adversely affect safety or health. A 

record that such examinations were 

conducted shall be kept by the operator 

for a period of one year, and shall be 

made available for review by the 

Secretary or his/her authorized 

representative. 

II. Desired Focus of Comments 

Currently, the Mine Safety and Health 

Administration (MSHA) is soliciting 

comments concerning the proposed 

extension of the information collection 

related to the Safety Defects, 

Examination, Correction, and Records. 

MSHA is particularly interested in 

comments which: 

• Evaluate whether the proposed 

collection of information is necessary 

for the proper performance of the 

functions of the agency, including 

whether the information will have 

practical utility; 

• Evaluate the accuracy of the 

agency’s estimate of the burden of the 

proposed collection of information, 

including the validity of the 

methodology and assumptions used; 

• Enhance the quality, utility, and 

clarity of the information to be 

collected; and 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES