alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.3
                              DECLARATION OF TRUST

     Know All Men By These  Presents  that Terry G. Cook of Suite  U-13,  601 W.
Broadway, Vancouver,  B.C.V5Z-4C2, does hereby declare that title to the mineral
claims  shown  below  are held in the name of Terry G.  Cook but that all  these
claims are held in trust for  Dakota  Mining &  Exploration  Ltd of Suite U-13 -
601-W. Broadway, Vancouver, B.C. V5Z-4C2.The claims are:

 WAY I CLAIM:

     The WAY 1 claim is a mineral claim  located 23  kilometers  north of Vernon
and 15  kilometers  south  southwest  of  Falkland  in the  Okanagan  region  of
south-central British Columbia.

     The Way 1 mineral claim consists of 20 units in the Vernon Mining  Division
(Tenure # 365255).

 BANJO I CLAIM:

     The Banjo I claim is a claim located 21  kilometers  north of Vernon and 16
kilometers  south southwest of Falkland in the Okanagan region of  south-central
British Columbia.

     The  Banjo I  mineral  claim  consists  of 20  units in the  Vernon  Mining
Division (Tenure # 366334).

 BANJO II CLAIM:

     The Banjo II claim is a claim located 21 kilometers  north of Vernon and 16
kilometers  south southwest of Falkland in the Okanagan region of  south-central
British Columbia.

     The  Banjo II  mineral  claim  consists  of 20 units in the  Vernon  Mining
Division (Tenure # 366335).

          Terry G. Cook has no interest  whatsoever  in the said mineral  claims
other than that of a bare trustee and that any  distribution  whether  income or
capital and whether in cash or otherwise,  and any rights in respect of the said
mineral  claims  do not in any  manner  belong  to  Terry G.  Cook,  but are the
property of the said Dakota Mining & Exploration Ltd.

          Terry G. Cook does hereby declare that the said shares are held in the
name of Terry G. Cook solely as a matter of convenience.

          DATED for reference the 18th day of Oct 1998.


<PAGE>



 SIGNED, SEALED and DELIVERED


                                                  /s/ Terry G. Cook
                                                  ------------------------------
 By Terry G. Cook in                                       Terry G. Cook
 the presence of:


 /s/ Michael Dufton
 ------------------------------
 Witness
 Michael Dufton
<PAGE>


                  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
                             CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,  Buko  von  Krosigk , certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant  to  Section  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report on Form 10-QSB of Wineshares International, Inc. for the quarterly period
ending October 31, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d)  of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained
in  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects
the  financial condition and results of operations of Wineshares, International,
Inc.

                  By:      /s/ Buko  von  Krosigk
                  Name:    Buko  von  Krosigk
                           ------------------
                  Title:   Chief Executive Officer and Director


                  Date:    May  22,  2003

I,  Gerard  Darmon,  certify,  pursuant  to  18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as  adopted
pursuant  to  Section  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report on Form 10-QSB of Wineshares International, Inc. for the quarterly period
ending October 31, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d)  of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained
in  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects
the  financial condition and results of operations of Wineshares, International,
Inc.

                  By:      /s/ Gerard  Darmon
                  Name:    Gerard  Darmon
                           --------------
                  Title:   Chief Financial Officer and Director


                  Date:    May  22,  2003
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 14 (Tuesday, January 23, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2897-2898]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-889]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[FEMA-1664-DR]


Hawaii; Amendment No. 5 to Notice of a Major Disaster Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster for the 
State of Hawaii (FEMA-1664-DR), dated October 17, 2006, and related 
determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: January 15, 2007.

[[Page 2898]]


FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Magda Ruiz, Recovery Division, Federal 
Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2705.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that the incident 
period for this disaster is closed effective January 15, 2007.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community 
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund Program; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services Program; 97.034, 
Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management 
Assistance; 97.048, Individuals and Households Housing; 97.049, 
Individuals and Households Disaster Housing Operations; 97.050, 
Individuals and Households Program--Other Needs; 97.036, Public 
Assistance Grants; 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.)

R. David Paulison,
Under Secretary for Federal Emergency Management, and Director of FEMA.
 [FR Doc. E7-889 Filed 1-22-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-10-P
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 367 

Expressing support for designation of the period beginning on June 9, 2008, 

and ending on June 13, 2008, as ‘‘National Health Information Technology Week’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 3, 2008 

Mr. KENNEDY submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for designation of the period beginning 

on June 9, 2008, and ending on June 13, 2008, as 

‘‘National Health Information Technology Week’’. 

Whereas the Center for Information Technology Leadership 

(CITL) estimated that the implementation of national 

standards for interoperability and the exchange of health 

information would save the United States approximately 

$77,000,000,000 in expenses relating to health care each 

year; 

Whereas the RAND Corporation estimated that, if the health 

care system of the United States implemented the use of 

computerized medical records, the system could save the 

United States more than $81,000,000,000 each year; 

health care information technology has been shown to imVerDate Aug 31 2005 00:15 Jun 04, 2008 Jkt 069200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6300 E:\BILLS\HC367.IH HC367

wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•HCON 367 IH 

prove the quality and safety of the delivery of health care 

in the United States; 

Whereas health care information technology and management 

systems have been recognized as essential tools for improving the quality and cost efficiency of the health care 

system; 

Whereas the President and Secretary of Health and Human 

Services have made a commitment to leveraging the benefits of the health care information technology and management systems by establishing the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology 

and the American Health Information Community; 

Whereas Congress has placed an emphasis on improving the 

quality and safety of the delivery of health care in the 

United States; and 

Whereas organizations across the country have come together 

to support National Health Information Technology 

Week since 2006 to improve public awareness relating to 

the potential benefits of improved quality and cost efficiency that the health care system could achieve by implementing health information technology: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That Congress— 

3 (1) recognizes the value of information tech4 nology and management systems to transforming 

5 health care for all Americans; 

6 (2) supports the designation of a ‘‘National 

7 Health Information Technology Week’’; and 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
3 

•HCON 367 IH 

1 (3) encourages the President to issue a procla2 mation calling upon all stakeholders to promote the 

3 use of information technology and management sys4 tems to transform the United States health care sys5 tem. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **CMBS Department**

 

MAC N9401-011

1055 10th Avenue SE

Minneapolis, MN 55414 |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc. 

1585 BROADWAY

NEW YORK, New York 10036-8200

 

RE: Annual Statement of Compliancefor Bank of America Merrill Lynch Commercial Mortgage Trust 2016-UBS10,Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2016-UBS10

 

Per the Pooling and ServicingAgreement dated as of June 1, 2016 (the “Agreement”), theundersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Custodian(“Wells Fargo”), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the yearending December 31, 2016 (the “Reporting Period”):

 

(a) A review of WellsFargo’s activities during the Reporting Period and of its performanceunder the Agreement has been made under such officer’s supervision; and

 

(b) To the best of suchofficer’s knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled allof its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

 

February 27, 2017

 

/s/ Gail Vannest

GAIL VANNEST

Vice President

 

 

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-30484

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee

v.

NAM VAN HOANG,

Defendant – Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

 for the Middle District of Louisiana

Before JONES, Chief Judge, JOLLY and GARZA, Circuit Judges.

E. GRADY JOLLY, Circuit Judge:

The government’s petition for panel rehearing is DENIED. 

In denying this petition, we should observe that shortly before our opinion

in this case issued, another panel decided United States v. Johnson, --- F.3d ----,

2011 WL 338802 (5th Cir. Feb. 4, 2011). Because the cases were decided

virtually simultaneously, our opinion failed to note Johnson, in which the panel

addressed whether the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act

(“SORNA”) applied to pre-enactment sex offenders at the time of enactment, or

whether the statute delegated to the Attorney General the decision to apply

SORNA to pre-enactment offenders. The panel held that “SORNA delegated

authority to the Attorney General to determine the applicability of SORNA to

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

March 25, 2011

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk
No. 09-30484

 The government’s motion for a stay of our ruling on this petition for panel rehearing 1

is also DENIED.

2

pre-enactment offenders.” Id. at *6. Although our opinion failed to cite Johnson,

our reasoning and holding in this case are not inconsistent with it. 

To be sure, we reached an alternative holding—that is, that to whatever

extent SORNA may be characterized as ambiguous, the rule of lenity precludes

us from applying it to Hoang—but this alternative holding yields no

inconsistency between our opinion and Johnson. Furthermore, although

Johnson additionally held that the Attorney General did not have good cause for

failing to comply with the Administrative Procedures Act in promulgating the

Interim Rule that declared SORNA retroactive, our panel was not presented

with that issue. The fact that we said Hoang, a pre-enactment sex offender, “did

not become subject to SORNA’s registration requirements until the Attorney

General issued the Interim Rule,” should not be construed otherwise. Finally,

although our opinion did not refer to three additional recently-decided cases

from other circuits—one consistent with our holding and two

conflicting—nothing in those cases alters the reasoning applied or the outcome

reached in this appeal.

DENIED.

1
### Water resources of the Chuska Mountains area, Navajo Indian Reservation, Arizona and New Mexico, with a section on quality of water

By: John William HarshbargerCharles Albert RepenningJames Lawrence Hatchett

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/cir308

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf) 
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

No abstract available.

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
#### Mahasn BASSEM, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 03-71884.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Sept. 15, 2005.*

Decided Sept. 20, 2005.

*886Ravit Rae Halperin, Esq., Korenberg Abramowitz & Feldun, Sherman Oaks, CA, for Petitioner.

Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Los Angeles, CA, Louis J. Ruffino, Esq., Office of the District Counsel, San Francisco, CA, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: FARRIS, THOMPSON, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Petitioner Mahasn Bassem applied for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture. The immigration judge denied his application based on an adverse credibility finding, which the BIA affirmed. Bassem now petitions for review.

The panel reviews the IJ’s denial of the petition for substantial evidence. *Cordon-Garcia v. INS,*204 F.3d 985, 990 (9th Cir.2000). Bassem’s testimony contained a material inconsistency as to the number of times he claims he was electrically shocked by the Syrian government. In his application for asylum, he stated that he received electrical shocks three-times per week during his incarceration. During his testimony before the IJ, he stated he received electrical shocks three-times over his two-month incarceration, a statement he repeated upon the IJ’s clarification. This inconsistency goes to the heart of Bassem’s asylum application. It is, therefore, material and as a result, the adverse credibility finding by the IJ was supported by substantial evidence.

Bassem also filed a motion to stay voluntary departure. This motion is moot because it is treated as being included within his prior motion to stay removal. *Desta v. Ashcroft,*365 F.3d 741, 743 (9th Cir.2004). Nonetheless, we must calculate the remaining number of voluntary departure days available to Bassem. On April 7, 2003, the BIA granted Bassem thirty-days to depart voluntarily. On May 6, 2003, Bassem filed his motion to stay removal. Applying Fed. R.App. P. 26(a) and this Court’s holding in *Desta,*365 F.3d at 750, Bassem has one-day from the issuance of this mandate to depart voluntarily from the United States before the Attorney General may enter a removal order.

PETITION DENIED; MOTION DISMISSED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
### The Honorable Richard G. Kopf, United States District Judge 1 

### forthe District of Nebraska, adopting the report an d recomm endations of the Honorable David L. Piester, United State s Magistrate Judge for the District of Nebraska. ___________ No. 95-3212

___________ Gloria Pettersen, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Nebraska. Harold W. Clarke, Director, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: April 4, 1996 Filed: April 18, 1996

___________ Before FAGG, BOWMAN, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Gloria Pe ttersen, a Nebraska inmate, filed a habeas petition citing 28 U.S.C. § 2254 in the caption and 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in the body of th e petition. The d istrict court concluded that because Pettersen complained o f 1 condit ions of confinement and due process violations in connection wit h placem ent in segregation, Pettersen's claims were not cognizable in a habeas petition. Accordingly, the district court dismissed the petition witho ut prejudice to the subsequent filing of an action pursuant to 4 2 U.S.C. § 1983. Pettersen appeals.

### -2- Havingcarefully reviewed the record and the parties' briefs, w e agree that Pettersen' s petition was properly dismissed without prejudice, as it did not challenge Pettersen's conviction or sentence. See Inmat e 115235, C.A. Kruger v. Erickson , 77 F.3d 1071, 1073 (8th Cir. 1996). Accordingly we affirm. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Exhibit
32.1






Certification






Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


(Subsections
(a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63


of Title
18, United States Code)




Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.  1350),
the undersigned officer of SonomaWest Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation
(the "Company"), does hereby certify that:




The
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 (the "Form
10-Q") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.






Dated:
May 15, 2008








/s/ Walker R.
Stapleton


Walker R.
Stapleton, President, Chief


Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer








A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
SonomaWest Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by SonomaWest Holdings, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          17,308
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  146,843
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     49,558
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               230,456
<PP&E>                                         380,293
<DEPRECIATION>                                  92,978
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 619,595
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          143,664
<BONDS>                                        266,136
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           69,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,331
<OTHER-SE>                                     119,033
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   619,595
<SALES>                                        307,861
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               307,861
<CGS>                                          261,258
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  261,258
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                30,330
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              11,328
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,945
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,493
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,546
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,546
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.41
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.41
        

</TABLE>
---

Summary of Loan Agreement Entered into by and between
Shenzhen BAKBattery Co., Ltd. (the Company) and Longgang
Branch, ShenzhenDevelopment Bank Co., Ltd (the Creditor)
on January 25, 2011

Main contents:

- Contract number: Shenfa
      Longgang Daizi 20110125001;
- Main Contract: Comprehensive
      Credit Facility Agreement;
- Main Contract number: Shenfa
      Longgang Zongzi 20110120001;
- Loan principal: RMB 70
      million;
- Loan term: from January 25,
      2011 to January 24, 2012;
- Floating interest rate: Interest rate
      of loan shall be equal to the benchmark rate announced by the Peoples
      Bank of China, and be adjusted every 3 months;

> Interest accrued and settled per month,
>       interest settlement day is the 20thday of each
>       month;
>     Penalty interest rate for delayed
>       repayment: current interest rate plus 50% * current interest rate;
>     Penalty interest rate for embezzlement
>       of loan proceeds: current interest rate *1;

- Purpose of the loan is to
      provide working capital for the Company;
- If any of the following occurs, the
      Creditor is entitled to demand prepayment of loan principal and interest
      before maturity and cancel all loans unprovided ;

> The Company terminates operation or is
>       stopped from operation;
>     The Company provides untrue documents or
>       hide important financial information
>       about its operation;
>     The Company intentionally evades bank
>       debts by way of related party transaction or other
>       means;
>     The Company uses loan proceeds for
>       purposes other than what is agreed without the consent
>       of the Creditor;
>     Occurrence of other instances which
>       endangers or may endanger the safety of the loan
>       provided by the Creditor;

Headlines of the articles omitted:

- Interest clearing of the loan
- Payment of the loan
- Rights and obligation of the Company
- Rights and obligations of the Creditor
- Disputation settlement and Validity
- Fees
- Breach of contract penalties
- Declaration, guaranty and undertaking of the Company
- Amendment and Termination of Contract
- Others
- Validity

---