alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
      31.2




CERTIFICATION




I,
      Chris
      R. Decker, certify that:




1.
      I have
      reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Security Intelligence
      Technologies, Inc.;




2.
      Based
      on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
      fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
      in
      light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
      with respect to the period covered by this report;




3.
      Based
      on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
      included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
      condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
      for, the periods presented in this report;




4.
      The
      registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
      maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
      Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:




a)
      designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
      controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
      material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
      subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
      during the period in which this report is being prepared;




b)
      evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and
      procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
      of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
      by this report based on such evaluation; and




c)
      disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
      financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s first fiscal quarter
      that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
      the
      registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and




5.
      The
      registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
      recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
      registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of
      directors:




a)
      all
      significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
      of
      internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
      adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
      report financial information; and




b)
      any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
      who
      have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
      reporting.




Date:
      February 15, 2008


/s/
                  Chris R. DeckerChris
                    R. Decker, Chief Financial Officer
Before the Second Division,

August 29, 1939

No. 42021.

#### Protests 891995-G, etc., of Kandelaft Silks, Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 91 (Friday, May 11, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26848-26849]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-9104]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-60,734]


Primary Staffing Services, Inc.; Workers Employed at Pearson 
Artworks, a Division of Pearson Education, Inc.; York, PA; Notice of 
Affirmative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration

    By application postmarked April 12, 2007, a petitioner requested 
administrative reconsideration of the Department of Labor's Notice of 
Negative Determination Regarding Eligibility to Apply for Worker 
Adjustment Assistance, applicable to workers and former workers of the 
subject firm. The determination was

[[Page 26849]]

issued on March 15, 2007 and published in the Federal Register on March 
30, 2007 (72 FR 15168).
    The initial investigation resulted in a negative determination 
based on the finding that imports of WEB based line art illustrations 
did not contribute importantly to worker separations at the subject 
firm and no shift of production to a foreign source occurred.
    The Department reviewed the request for reconsideration and has 
determined that the petitioner has provided additional information. 
Therefore, the Department will conduct further investigation to 
determine if the workers meet the eligibility requirements of the Trade 
Act of 1974.

Conclusion

    After careful review of the application, I conclude that the claim 
is of sufficient weight to justify reconsideration of the Department of 
Labor's prior decision. The application is, therefore, granted.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 4th day of May, 2007.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E7-9104 Filed 5-10-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1337 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1337

   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permanently extend 
  existing elective tax treatment for Alaska Native Settlement Trusts.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              July 7, 2011

  Ms. Murkowski (for herself and Mr. Begich) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permanently extend 
  existing elective tax treatment for Alaska Native Settlement Trusts.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT EXTENSION OF ELECTIVE TAX TREATMENT FOR ALASKA 
              NATIVE SETTLEMENT TRUSTS.

    (a) In General.--Section 901 of the Economic Growth and Tax Relief 
Reconciliation Act of 2001 (relating to sunset provisions) shall not 
apply to the provisions of, and amendments made by, section 671 of such 
Act (relating to tax treatment and information requirements of Alaska 
Native Settlement Trusts).
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall be 
effective upon the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
## In T he Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07 - 22 - 00211 - CV ESCOBAR CONSTRUCTION, LLC AND VINCENT MARTINEZ , A PPELLANT S V. ELEVINIO RIOJAS , APPELLEE On Appeal from the 425th Judicial District Court

Williamson County, Texas Trial Court No . 21 - 0761 - C425 , Honorable Betsy F. Lambeth , Presiding



### December 29 , 2022 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before QUINN, C.J., and DOSS and YARBROUGH, JJ. Appellants, Escobar Construction, LLC and Vincent Martinez, appeal from the trial court’s Final Judgment . 1 Appellants’ brief was due December 2, 2022 , but was not filed. By letter of December 9 , 2022, we notified Appellants that the appeal was subject to dismissal for want of prosecution, without further notice, if a brief was not received by

1 Originally appealed to the Third Court of Appeals, this appeal was transferred to this Court by the Texas Supreme Court pursuant to its docket equalizations efforts. See T EX . G OV ’ T C ODE A NN . § 73.001.2

December 19. To date, Appellants ha ve n either filed a brief nor had any further communication with this Court. Accordingly, we dismiss th is appeal for want of prosecution. See T EX . R. A PP . P . 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b). Per Curiam
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,**

**Petitioner**

**v.**

**STEPHEN NOEL JESSEE,**

**Respondent :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 752 MAL 2015** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 23rd day of August, 2016, the Petition for All owance of Appeal is** 

DENIED

**.**

**Justice Wecht did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.**
<PAGE>

Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of The PBSJ Corporation (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Richard A. Wickett,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350,
as adopted pursuant to (S) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

August 14, 2002                          By: /s/ Richard A. Wickett
                                             ----------------------

                                              Richard A. Wickett
                                               Chairman, Chief Financial
                                               Officer and Treasurer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency 

          - [FEMA-1673-DR] 

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Missouri (FEMA-1673-DR), dated December 29, 2006, and related determinations. 

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

January 8, 2007. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Magda Ruiz, Recovery Division, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2705. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) hereby gives notice that pursuant to the authority vested in the Director, under Executive Order 12148, as amended, Michael L. Karl, of FEMA is appointed to act as the Federal Coordinating Officer for this declared disaster. 

This action terminates my appointment of Thomas J. Costello as Federal Coordinating Officer for this disaster. 

                        (The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund Program; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services Program; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance; 97.048, Individuals and Households Housing; 97.049, Individuals and Households Disaster Housing Operations; 97.050, Individuals and Households Program—Other Needs;  97.036, Public                               ( print page 2899)                            Assistance Grants; 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.)                    

R. David Paulison, 

Under Secretary for Federal Emergency Management, and Director of FEMA. 

[FR Doc. E7-879 Filed 1-22-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110-10-P
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



### September 10, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice 

### 133062(68) Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan 

### PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices



### v SC: 133062 COA: 264593 Macomb CC: 2004-004313-FC MARTIN CHRISTIAN SORLIEN, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion for re consideration of this Court’s May 30, 2007 order is considered, and it is DENIED, beca use it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously.

p0830 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 10, 2007

Clerk
No. 53802.

petition 6677-R (San Juan).

#### Ballester Hermanos, Inc., Successors to Ballester Hermanos *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

The vice president of the petitioning corporation testified that the entered value represented the price at which the merchandise was quoted by cable to him prior to purchase; that neither at the time of entry nor subsequently was he able to obtain any information from Cuba indicating any other value for the merchandise; and that such information as he was able to obtain supported the entered value. From the entire record the court held that entry of the merchandise at a less value than that returned upon final ap-praisement was without any intention to defraud the revenue of the United States or to conceal or misrepresent the facts of the case or to deceive the appraiser as to the value of the merchandise. The petition was therefore granted.

Cole, J., concurring
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                            <C>              <C>             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                     3-MOS            9-MOS            YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              DEC-31-1999      DEC-31-1999      DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                   SEP-30-1999      SEP-30-1999      DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                   0          45,396           47,049
<SECURITIES>                             0               0                0
<RECEIVABLES>                            0             930                0
<ALLOWANCES>                             0               0                0
<INVENTORY>                              0               0                0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         0       4,034,582        4,192,881
<PP&E>                                   0               0                0
<DEPRECIATION>                           0               0                0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           0       4,080,908        4,239,930
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    0       1,653,523        1,653,455
<BONDS>                                  0               0                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                    0               0                0
<PREFERRED>                              0               0                0
<COMMON>                                 0               0                0
<OTHER-SE>                               0       2,427,385        2,586,475
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             0       4,080,908        4,239,930
<SALES>                                  0               0                0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                    19,589             943                0
<CGS>                                    0               0                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            0               0                0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                    26,716         160,033                0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                         0               0                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       0               0                0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     (7,127)       (159,090)               0
<INCOME-TAX>                             0               0                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      0               0                0
<DISCONTINUED>                           0               0                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                          0               0                0
<CHANGES>                                0               0                0
<NET-INCOME>                        (7,127)       (159,090)               0
<EPS-BASIC>                              0               0                0
<EPS-DILUTED>                            0               0                0


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 23.1CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMWe consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos.333-60997, 333-61007, 333-90802, 333-90858 and 333-90860) of Hastings Entertainment, Inc. of ourreport dated March 31, 2005, except for paragraph 5 of Note 1(d), as to which the date is January9, 2006, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of HastingsEntertainment, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K/A, Amendment No. 1) for the yearended January 31, 2005.              /s/ Ernst & Young LLP         Fort Worth, Texas
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 85 (Thursday, May 3, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 24578]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-8407]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER07-738-000]


Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC; Notice of Filing

April 25, 2007.
    Take notice that on April 9, 2007, Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC filed 
a notice informing the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 
(Commission) that it adopts the revised Transmission Loading Relief 
(TRL), approved by the North American Electric Reliability Council, and 
that its Open Access Transmission Tariff, FERC Electric Tariff, Fourth 
Revised Volume No. 4, should be deemed to be modified to incorporate 
TRL procedures contained in Version 3 of the Reliability Standards, 
pursuant to the Commission's March 3, 2007 Order.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. On or 
before the comment date, it is not necessary to serve motions to 
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#591f1c0b1a16373530373c0a2c2929362b2d193f3c2b3a773e362f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="8dcbc8dfcec2e3e1e4e3e8def8fdfde2fff9cdebe8ffeea3eae2fb">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on April 30, 2007.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E7-8407 Filed 5-2-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# C_2019148EN.01004101.xml

| 29.4.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 148/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.4.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 148/41

---

Judgment of the General Court of 12 March 2019 — Italy v Commission

(Case T-135/15) (1)

(EAGF - Expenses excluded from financing - Expenditure incurred by Italy - Temporary scheme for the restructuring of the sugar industry - Regulation (EC) No 320/2006 - Regulation(EC) No 968/2006 - Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005 - Time limit of 24 months - Concept of ‘multiannual measure’ - Conditions for granting restructuring aid - Concept of ‘production facility’ - Classification of silos - Concept of‘complete dismantling’ - Annex 2 to Document VI/5330/97 - Problems in interpreting EU legislation - Cooperation in good faith - Legitimate expectations - Ne bis in idem - Slaughter premiums - Information and promotion campaigns for agricultural products - Late payments - Evidence of the existence of specific management conditions - Equal treatment - Mistranslation in one of the language versions of an EU regulation - Whether the Member State is answerable for the financial correction)

(2019/C 148/37)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Italian Republic (represented by: G. Palmieri, acting as Agent, and C. Colelli, avvocato dello Stato)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: initially, D. Bianchi, P Ondrůšek and I. Galindo Martín, acting as Agents, and subsequently, D. Bianchi and P Ondrůšek, acting as Agents)

Interveners in support of the applicant: French Republic (represented by: D. Colas and S Horrenberger, acting as Agents) and Hungary (represented by: M.Z. Fehér and G. Koós, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU for the partial annulment of Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/103 of 16 January 2015 excluding from European Union financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) (OJ 2015 L 16, p.33), in so far as it relates to certain expenditure incurred by the Italian Republic.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the Italian Republic to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Italian Republic to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission;

| 3. | Orders the French Republic and Hungary to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the French Republic and Hungary to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 155, 11.5.2015.

---