alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 379 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.Con.Res.379
                                                 Agreed to June 26, 2008

                       One Hundred Tenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday,
            the third day of January, two thousand and eight

                          Concurrent Resolution

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That when the House adjourns on the legislative day of Thursday, June 
26, 2008, or Friday, June 27, 2008, on a motion offered pursuant to 
this concurrent resolution by its Majority Leader or his designee, it 
stand adjourned until 2 p.m. on Tuesday, July 8, 2008, or until the 
time of any reassembly pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent 
resolution, whichever occurs first; and that when the Senate recesses 
or adjourns on any day from Thursday, June 26, 2008, through Friday, 
July 4, 2008, on a motion offered pursuant to this concurrent 
resolution by its Majority Leader or his designee, it stand recessed or 
adjourned until noon on Monday, July 7, 2008, or such other time on 
that day as may be specified in the motion to recess or adjourn, or 
until the time of any reassembly pursuant to section 2 of this 
concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first.
    Sec. 2.  The Speaker of the House and the Majority Leader of the 
Senate, or their respective designees, acting jointly after 
consultation with the Minority Leader of the House and the Minority 
Leader of the Senate, shall notify the Members of the House and the 
Senate, respectively, to reassemble at such place and time as they may 
designate if, in their opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.
Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>              1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              AUG-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   FEB-29-2000
<CASH>                                                 491
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       18,373
<ALLOWANCES>                                        (1,257)
<INVENTORY>                                          4,788
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    25,305
<PP&E>                                              97,484
<DEPRECIATION>                                     (40,474)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     108,879
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               21,935
<BONDS>                                             19,932
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             4,993
<OTHER-SE>                                          31,597
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       108,879
<SALES>                                             49,243
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    49,243
<CGS>                                               29,299
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       44,924
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    15,625
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   1,552
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      3,939
<INCOME-TAX>                                         1,398
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  2,541
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                         2,541
<EPS-BASIC>                                           0.51
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0.51



</TABLE>
Before the Third Division,

February 18, 1942

No. 46959.

#### Protest 60861-K (A) of McClintock, Stern Co., Inc. (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of ginger root not preserved or candied, unground, the same as that the subject of *Wilson*v. *United States*(28 C. C. P. A. 63, C. A. D. 126). The claim for free entry under paragraph 1768 was therefore sustained.
# C_2016251EN.01002701.xml

| 11.7.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 251/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.7.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 251/27

---

Judgment of the General Court of 26 May 2016 — International Management Group v Commission

(Case T-110/15) (1)

1

((Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Documents relating to an OLAF investigation - Access refused - Exception concerning the protection of the purpose of inspections, investigations and audits - Obligation to carry out a specific and individual examination - Category of documents))

(2016/C 251/30)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: International Management Group (Brussels, Belgium) (represented initially by M. Burgstaller, Solicitor, and E. Wright, Barrister, and subsequently by A. Tymen and L. Levi, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Baquero Cruz and S. Bartelt, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action pursuant to Article 263 TFEU for annulment of Decision THOR/C4/LL/el/(S) (2015) 4287 of the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) of 6 February 2015 refusing to grant the applicant access to documents relating to the investigation concerning it.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders International Management Group to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders International Management Group to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 138, 27.4.2015.

1

---
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 178 

Expressing the sense of the Congress that the United States should expand 

trade opportunities with Mongolia by initiating negotiations to enter 

into a free trade agreement with Mongolia. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 28, 2007 

Mr. DREIER (for himself, Mr. HASTERT, Mr. COLE of Oklahoma, Mr. PITTS, 

Mr. PUTNAM, and Mr. RUSH) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the Congress that the United States 

should expand trade opportunities with Mongolia by initiating negotiations to enter into a free trade agreement 

with Mongolia. 

Whereas Mongolia rejected 1-party Communist rule and embarked on democratic and free-market reforms in 1990; 

Whereas these reforms included privatizing state enterprises, 

lifting price controls, and instituting fiscal discipline; 

Whereas presidential and legislative elections have been held, 

with extremely high voter turnout, since 1996; 

Whereas Mongolia remains steadfastly committed to greater 

economic reforms; 


ccoleman on PRODPC75 with BILLS
2 

•HCON 178 IH 

Whereas Mongolia has been a member of the World Trade 

Organization since 1997; 

Whereas in 1999 the United States provided permanent normal trade relations treatment to the products of Mongolia; 

Whereas the United States and Mongolia signed a bilateral 

Trade and Investment Framework Agreement (TIFA) in 

2004; 

Whereas bilateral trade between the United States and Mongolia in 2006 was valued at $137,000,000; 

Whereas Mongolia has been an early political and logistical 

supporter of the global war on terror, contributing 

troops, engineers, and medical personnel to Operation 

Iraqi Freedom since April 2003, offering overflight clearances for United States forces, and participating in training artillery units of the Afghan National Army; 

Whereas on August 6, 2002, the President signed into law 

H.R. 3009 (Public Law 107–210), the Trade Act of 

2002, which provides for an expedited procedure for congressional consideration of international trade agreements; and 

Whereas workers, consumers, business owners, and investors 

benefit substantially from expanding and diversifying 

trade opportunities by reducing tariff and nontariff barriers to trade: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that the 

3 United States should expand trade opportunities with 


ccoleman on PRODPC75 with BILLS
3 

•HCON 178 IH 

1 Mongolia by initiating negotiations to enter into a free 

2 trade agreement with Mongolia. 

Æ 


ccoleman on PRODPC75 with BILLS
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v LEO R. ROMANO, Private E-2, U. S. Army, Appellant

9 USCMA 557, 26 CMR 337

No. 11,515

Decided September 12, 1958

*Captain Arnold I. Melnick*and *First Lieutenant Gerald G. Barton*were on the brief for Appellant, Accused.

*558
      *Major Thomas J. Nichols*and *First Lieutenant Chester F. Relyea*were on the brief for Appellee, United States.

Opinion of the Court

ROBERT E. Quinn, Chief Judge:

The instructional question in this case is the same as that in United States v Hairston, 9 USCMA 554, 26 CMR 334. For the reasons set out in the principal opinion in that case, the decision of the board of review here is affirmed.

Judge LatimeR concurs.

Judge FERGUSON dissents.
No. 54291.

#### P. Gdalia and M. L. Gutierrez *v.*United States,

protests 113160-K and 117718-K (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise is similar in all material respects to the miniature leather gloves the subject of *United States*v. *Ignaz Strauss & Co., Inc. (37 C. C.*P. A. 32, C. A. D. 415), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 412 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 412

  Honoring and recognizing the life and accomplishments of Jack Hanna.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 11, 2008

  Mr. Tiberi submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
      referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
  Honoring and recognizing the life and accomplishments of Jack Hanna.

Whereas Jack Bushnell Hanna was born January 2, 1947, in Knoxville, Tennessee;
Whereas Mr. Hanna graduated from Muskingum College in New Concord, Ohio, with a 
        Bachelor of Arts degree;
Whereas Mr. Hanna was married to his wife Suzi (Egli) Hanna in 1968;
Whereas Mr. Hanna has 3 daughters, Kathaleen, Suzanne, and Julie;
Whereas in 1978, Mr. Hanna was named Director of the Columbus Zoo in Columbus, 
        Ohio;
Whereas in 1992, Mr. Hanna was named Director Emeritus of the Columbus Zoo;
Whereas Mr. Hanna was the driving force behind transforming the Columbus Zoo and 
        Aquarium into an internationally known facility;
Whereas since 1983, Mr. Hanna has been a regular guest on national news programs 
        like, ``Good Morning America'', ``The Late Show with David Letterman'', 
        and ``Larry King Live'', educating viewers, and sharing with them his 
        passion for the animal kingdom;
Whereas in 1993, Mr. Hanna became the host of Jack Hanna's Animal Kingdom, a 
        nationally syndicated educational and conservation-oriented television 
        program, and over a decade later he started a new television series 
        titled Jack Hanna's Into the Wild;
Whereas Mr. Hanna has been instrumental in Muskingum College's development of an 
        interdisciplinary conservation major and serves on the boards of several 
        educational institutions;
Whereas Mr. Hanna was an important supporter of the establishment of a 10,000-
        acre wildlife preserve in Ohio called The Wilds;
Whereas Mr. Hanna is a Board Member of the Dian Fossey Gorilla Fund;
Whereas Mr. Hanna is an active supporter of Easter Seals and the Leukemia 
        Society;
Whereas Mr. Hanna has been granted honorary Ph.D.s from Muskingum College, 
        Otterbein College, and Capital University; and
Whereas Mr. Hanna, through his humanitarian efforts and infectious enthusiasm, 
        has touched the lives of so many people around the world: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That Congress honors and recognizes Jack Hanna for his lifetime of 
accomplishments.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2017195EN.01002102.xml

| 19.6.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 195/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.6.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 195/21

---

Judgment of the General Court of 27 April 2017 — BASF v EUIPO — Evonik Industries (DINCH)

(Case T-721/15) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU word mark DINCH - Absolute grounds for refusal - Descriptiveness - Lack of distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Article 52(1)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009))

(2017/C 195/29)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: BASF SE (Ludwigshafen, Germany) (represented by: A. Schulz and C. Onken, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: R. Pethke and M. Fischer, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Evonik Industries AG (Essen, Germany) (represented by A. Schabenberger, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 23 September 2015 (Case R 2080/2014-1), relating to invalidity proceedings between Evonik Industries and BASF.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

dismisses the action;

| 2. | orders BASF SE to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

orders BASF SE to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 68, 22.2.2016.

1

---
(Reap. Dec. 9825)

#### A. W. Faber Castell Pencil Co. *v.*United States

Entry No. N-118.

(Decided October 27, 1960)

*Sharretts, Paley & Garter*for the plaintiff.

*George Ooehran Doul),*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Laweence, Judge:

The proper dutiable value of certain drawing pencils identified as No. 9201 on the consular invoice attached to the entry papers herein, which merchandise was exported from Germany, is before the court for determination.

The parties hereto have entered into a stipulation of fact wherein it has been agreed:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the parties hereto that the merchandise covered by the above-named appeal for reappraisement consists of drawing pencils #9201, exported from Germany on or about July 3,1958.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that said merchandise is on the list of products published in T.D. 54521, which is subject to the provisions of section 402a of the Tariff Act of 1930, and that there is no foreign, export, or United States value as described in sections 402a (c) (d) or (e), respectively, for said merchandise.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the cost of production as described in section 402a (f) for pencils #9201 is DM 24.26 per gross, packing included.

Upon the record before the court, I find and hold that cost of production, as that value is defined in section 402a (f) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956 (19 U.S'.C. § 1402a (f)), is the proper basis for determining the value of the No. 9201 pencils in controversy and that such value is DM 24.26 per gross, packing included.

As to all other merchandise, the appeal is dismissed.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Nuclear Regulatory Commission

The ACRS Subcommittee on Thermal-Hydraulic Phenomena will hold a meeting on May 15-16, 2007, Commissioners' Conference Room O-1G16, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland. 

The entire meeting will be open to public attendance. 

The agenda for the subject meeting shall be as follows:

*Tuesday, May 15, 2007—8:30 a.m. until the conclusion of business*.                 

*Wednesday, May 16, 2007—8:30 a.m. until the conclusion of business*.                           ( print page 24340)    

The Subcommittee will hear from the NRR staff and the Nuclear Energy Institute regarding the progress in resolving GSI-191, “PWR Sump Performance.” The Subcommittee will gather information, analyze relevant issues and facts, and formulate proposed positions and actions, as appropriate, for deliberation by the full Committee. 

Members of the public desiring to provide oral statements and/or written comments should notify the Designated Federal Official, Ms. Zena Abdullahi (Telephone: 301-415-2808) five days prior to the meeting, if possible, so that appropriate arrangements can be made. Electronic recordings will be permitted. 

Further information regarding this meeting can be obtained by contacting the Designated Federal Official between 7:30 a.m. and 4:15 p.m. (ET). Persons planning to attend this meeting are urged to contact the above named individual at least two working days prior to the meeting to be advised of any potential changes to the agenda. 

Dated: April 25, 2007. 

Cayetano Santos, 

Branch Chief, ACRS.

 [FR Doc. E7-8298 Filed 5-1-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development 

Office of Davis-Bacon & Labor Standards 

DBLS Notice 2018-01 

Subject: “Mandatory” Paid Sick Leave for Federal Contractors is not Applicable 

to Construction Activities Subject to Davis-Bacon and Related Acts 

Date: October 15, 2018 

Purpose:

To inform HUD Local Contracting Agencies (LCAs) and other clients that paid sick leave is not a 

requirement for contracts governed by Davis-Bacon and Related Acts (DBRA). HUD is making 

this Notice available due to the number of questions received by staff. Executive Order (EO) 

13706, signed on September 7, 2015, established paid sick leave for federal contractors governed 

by the Davis-Bacon Act. This EO only applies when the federal government has directly hired 

the prime contractor. 

How does this impact me? 

For most HUD program participants, the EO will not apply to them. Most of HUD’s programs 

are funded through assistance to State, local or tribal governments or agencies, or by assistance in 

the form of mortgage insurance or guaranty. 

Where can I find the Regulation that implemented the EO?

The U.S. Department of Labor published the regulation in the Federal Register on September 30, 

2016. This document can be found at the U.S. Department of Labor website, 

https://www.dol.gov/whd/govcontracts/eo13706/. 

Any questions regarding this Notice should be directed to HUD’s Regional DBLS staff with 

jurisdiction for your area. A list of Labor Standards contacts is available on our national webpage. 

/S/ 

Pamela Glekas Spring 

Director 

Office of Davis Bacon and Labor Standards
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED April 20, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-61087 Conference Calendar

DAVID WARD, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus GEORGE AGNEW, Defendant-Appellee.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 3:03-CV-1054-BN

-------------------- Before JOLLY, JONES, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * David Ward, Mississippi state prisoner # 42745, appeals the 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) dismissal as legally frivolous of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 lawsuit against George Agnew, retained to serve as Ward’s counsel in a criminal matter. Ward contends that the district court erred in dismissing his case because Agnew deprived him of his Sixth Amendment rights. This court reviews the district court’s dismissal for abuse of discretion

. See Siglar v. Hightower , 112 F.3d 191, 193 (5th Cir. 1997).No. 03-61087 - 2 - The district court concluded that Ward’s lawsuit was foreclosed by Polk County v. Dodson , 454 U.S. 312, 325 (1981), because Agnew was not acting under the color of state law for the purposes of 42 U.S.C. § 1983 liability. The district court’s reliance on Dodson was appropriate; and it is uncontested by Ward on appeal. Since the allegations in Ward’s complaint were squarely foreclosed by Dodson , the district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing his lawsuit as frivolous. See Siglar , 112 F.3d at 193. Because Ward has not shown that there is a nonfrivolous appellate issue, his appeal is also dismissed as frivolous.
See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2; Brinkmann v. Johnston , 793 F.2d 111, 112-13 (5th Cir. 1986). The dismissal of the appeal as frivolous and the district court’s dismissal of Ward’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action as frivolous both count as “strikes” under the three-strikes provision of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). See Adepegba v. Hammons , 103 F.3d 383, 387-88 (5th Cir. 1996). Therefore, Ward is warned that if he accumulates three “strikes,” he will not be able to proceed in forma pauperis in any civil action or appeal filed while he is incarcerated or detained in any facility unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTIONS WARNING ISSUED.
Before the Third Division,

May 26, 1949

No. 53205.

#### John Wanamaker, New York, et al. *v.*United States,

protests 119618-K(A), etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.