alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 12.1
 Kansas City Southern de México, S.A. de C.V.
Schedule of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
 Successor
    
    
    PredecessorNine months
    
    
    Three MonthsYear ended
    
    
    Year ended
    
    
    ended
    
    
    Ended
    
    
    Year endedDecember 31,
    
    
    December 31,
    
    
    December 31
    
    
    March 31,
    
    
    December 31,2007
    
    
    2006
    
    
    2005
    
    
    2005
    
    
    2004
    
    
    2003Income (loss) before income taxes
and minority interest
    
    $
    128.5
    
    
    $
    80.4
    
    
    $
    86.0
    
    
    $
    (0.5
    )
    
    $
    (4.1
    )
    
    $
    (16.4
    )Equity Method
    
    
    (5.7
    )
    
    
    (5.9
    )
    
    
    1.5
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (0.1
    )
    
    
    (0.3
    )VAT/PUT Settlement
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (141.0
    )
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Interest expenses on indebtedness
    
    
    81.9
    
    
    
    92.9
    
    
    
    70.4
    
    
    
    25.6
    
    
    
    102.7
    
    
    
    103.8Amortization of capitalized interest
    
    
    3.5
    
    
    
    3.5
    
    
    
    1.8
    
    
    
    1.6
    
    
    
    7.0
    
    
    
    6.4Portion of rents representative of
an appropriate interest factor
    
    
    21.4
    
    
    
    20.9
    
    
    
    15.0
    
    
    
    4.6
    
    
    
    18.0
    
    
    
    18.8Income (loss) before income taxes
and minority interest Adjusted
    
    $
    229.6
    
    
    $
    191.8
    
    
    $
    33.7
    
    
    $
    31.3
    
    
    $
    123.5
    
    
    $
    112.3Fixed charges:Interest expenses on indebtedness
    
    
    81.9
    
    
    
    92.9
    
    
    
    70.4
    
    
    
    25.6
    
    
    
    102.7
    
    
    
    103.8Amortization of capitalized interest
    
    
    3.5
    
    
    
    3.5
    
    
    
    1.8
    
    
    
    1.6
    
    
    
    7.0
    
    
    
    6.4Portion of rents representative of
an appropriate interest factor (1)
    
    
    21.4
    
    
    
    20.9
    
    
    
    15.0
    
    
    
    4.6
    
    
    
    18.0
    
    
    
    18.8Total fixed charges
    
    $
    106.8
    
    
    $
    117.3
    
    
    $
    87.2
    
    
    $
    31.8
    
    
    $
    127.7
    
    
    $
    129.0Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
    
    
    2.1
    
    
    
    1.6
    
    
    
    N/A*
    
    
    
    1.0
    
    
    
    1.0
    
    
    
    N/A*
 
 *
    
    For the nine months ended December 31, 2005 and the year ended
December 31, 2003, our earnings were insufficient to cover fixed
charges by $53.5 million and $16.6 million, respectively.(1)
    
    Rents represent one-third of rents expense.
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, e xcept under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and col lateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judg ments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and condi tions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

1 After examining appellant’s brief and the appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously to grant appellant’s requestfor a decision on the brief without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(f); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The c ase is therefore ordered submitted without oral argumen t. 

## F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### JUL 23 1998 

### PATRICK FISHER Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT
VERNA MONKS, a/k/a Verna Stafford, Petitioner-Appellant,

v. NEVILLE MASSIE,

Respondent-Appellee. No. 97-6417 (D.C. No. CIV-97-645-A) (W.D. Okla.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Before BALDOCK , EBEL , and MURPHY , Circuit Judges.

Appellant, Verna Monks, appeals the district court’ s denial of her petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U. S.C. § 2254. 1 Before-2-

proceeding on appeal, Monks must obtain a certificate of appealability from this court, which requires “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). Monks pled guilty to two counts of second degree mu rder and was given two concurrent indeterminate sentences of ten years ’ to life imprisonment. After successfully challenging the validity of those sent ences, Monks was resentenced by a different judge, who imposed two consecutive l ife sentences based upon evidence developed at the second sentencing hearing of the grievous and outrageous nature of the crimes for which she was c onvicted and other criminal conduct. Monks challenges the harsher sentences onthe ground of judicial vindictiveness. A presumption of vindictiveness wi ll not arise when, as here, “a different judge imposes the second sentence and provides an on-the-record, wholly logical, nonvindictive reason for the senten ce.” Macomber v. Hannigan , 15 F.3d 155, 156 (10th Cir. 1994) (quotation omitte d). Absent a presumption of vindictiveness, Monks bears the burden of demonstrating actual vindictiveness,

see id. at 157, which she has failed to do.-3-

Therefore, Monks’ application for a certificate of appealability is DENIED, and the appeal is DISMISSED.

Entered for the Court

David M. Ebel Circuit Judge
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 14 (Tuesday, January 23, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2900-2901]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-894]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[MT-020-1010-PO]


Notice of Public Meeting, Eastern Montana Resource Advisory 
Council Meeting

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior, Montana, Billings and 
Miles City Field Offices.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Land Policy and Management Act 
(FLPMA) and the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972 (FACA), the U.S. 
Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Eastern 
Montana Resource Advisory Council (RAC), will meet as indicated below.

DATES: The meeting will be held February 22, 2007 in Billings, MT 
beginning at 8 a.m. When determined, the meeting place will be 
announced in a news release. The public comment period will begin at 
approximately 11 a.m. and the meeting will adjourn at approximately 
3:30 p.m.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mark Jacobsen, Public Affairs 
Specialist, Miles City Field Office, 111 Garryowen Road, Miles City, 
Montana 59301. Telephone: (406) 233-2831.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 15-member Council advises the Secretary 
of the Interior, through the Bureau of Land Management, on a variety of 
planning and management issues associated with public land management 
in Montana.
    At this meeting, topics to discuss include:
Field Manager Updates
The Miles City Field Office and Billings Field Office Updates
Subcommittee updates and working sessions
--and other topics the council may raise.

All meetings are open to the public. The public may present written 
comments to the Council. Each formal Council meeting will also have 
time allocated for hearing public comments. Depending on the number of 
persons wishing to comment and time available, the time for individual 
oral comments may be limited. Individuals who plan to attend and need 
special assistance, such as sign language interpretation, tour 
transportation or other reasonable accommodations, should contact the 
BLM as provided above.


[[Page 2901]]


    Dated: January 11, 2007.
James A. Albano,
Field Manager.
 [FR Doc. E7-894 Filed 1-22-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-$$-P
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 126 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 126

To reduce the amount of financial assistance provided to the Government 
of Mexico in response to the illegal border crossings from Mexico into 
 the United States, which serve to dissipate the political discontent 
            with the higher unemployment rate within Mexico.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             January 25 (legislative day, January 5), 2011

  Mr. Vitter introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
         referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To reduce the amount of financial assistance provided to the Government 
of Mexico in response to the illegal border crossings from Mexico into 
 the United States, which serve to dissipate the political discontent 
            with the higher unemployment rate within Mexico.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BORDER CROSSING ACCOUNTABILITY.

    (a) Estimation of Annual Illegal Border Crossings.--Not later than 
30 days after the end of each fiscal year, the Secretary of State, in 
consultation with the Secretary of Homeland Security, shall estimate 
the number of illegal border crossings that occurred during such fiscal 
year along the southern land border of the United States.
    (b) Reduction of Foreign Assistance.--
            (1) In general.--Except as provided under paragraph (2), 
        the Secretary of State, shall proportionately reduce the amount 
        of financial assistance provided to the Government of Mexico 
        for each fiscal year by a total of $1,000 for each illegal 
        border crossing from Mexico to the United States during the 
        previous fiscal year.
            (2) Exception.--Notwithstanding paragraph (1), the 
        Secretary of State may decide not to reduce the amounts 
        appropriated for the Government of Mexico from the 
        International Military Education and Training Fund, the 
        International Narcotics Control and Law Enforcement Fund, and 
        the fund to carry out nonproliferation, anti-terrorism, 
        demining, and related programs and activities.
                                 <all>
```
# United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 21-3656

___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee

v. Mohamed Salah Hussein, also known as Cheese lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant

____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota

____________ Submitted: April 5, 2022 Filed: April 11, 2022 [Unpublished]

____________ Before GRUENDER, ERICKSON, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges.

____________ PER CURIAM. Mohamed Hussein appeals the sentence imposed by the district court 1 after he pleaded guilty to a drug offense, pursuant to a plea agreement containing an appeal

1 The Honorable Ann D. Montgomery, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota.waiver. His counsel has moved for leave to withdraw, and has filed a brief under

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), challenging the sentence. Upon careful review, we conclude that the appeal waiver is valid, enforceable, and applicable to the issue raised in this appeal. See United States v. Scott, 627 F.3d 702, 704 (8th Cir. 2010) (validity and applicability of an appeal waiver is reviewed de novo); United States v. Andis, 333 F.3d 886, 889-92 (8th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (appeal waiver will be enforced if the appeal falls within the scope of the waiver, the defendant knowingly and voluntarily entered into the plea agreement and the waiver, and enforcing the waiver would not result in a miscarriage of justice). We have also independently reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988), and have found no non-frivolous issues for appeal falling outside the scope of the waiver. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal based on the appeal waiver, and we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.

______________________________

-2-
Before the Second Division,

April 26, 1951

No. 55490.

#### Dinhofer Bros., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 142489-K (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

The protest was dismissed.
#### United States *v.*F. W. Kuehne Co.

No. 6110.

Invoice dated Prague, Czechoslovakia, May 23, 1938.

Certified May 24, 1938.

Entered at New York, N. Y., June 9, 1938.

Entry No. 863009.

Second Division, Appellate Term

(Decided March 2, 1945)

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General *(Daniel I. Auster,*special attorney), for the appellant.

*Eugene R. Pickrell (Eugene A. Chase*of counsel) for the appellee.

Before Trnsoisr, Kotcheloe, and Lawrence, Judges

Lawrence, Judge:

For the reasons carefully and elaborately stated in the opinion below (Reap. Dec. 5985) by our late associate, Judge Walker, whose findings of fact and conclusions of law we hereby adopt as our own, the decision and judgment appealed from are affirmed.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32


      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report on Form 10-KSB of Brilliant Technologies
Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned,
Allan Klepfisz, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13
                  (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


Date: May 25, 2006                           By: /s/ Allan Klepfisz
                                                 ------------------------------
                                                 Allan Klepfisz, President,
                                                 Chief Executive Officer, and
                                                 Acting Chief Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-1059
In Re: GLEN MARCUS FALLIN, Appellant.

_________________________ ROBERT DICARLO, Plaintiff, versus BALTIMORE COUNTY, MARYLAND, a municipal corporation; WESLEY P. MARTIN, individually and in his official capacity as an employee of the Department of Recreation and Parts of Baltimore County, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. M. J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-95-556- MJG) Argued: April 7, 1997 Decided: May 2, 1997 Before LUTTIG and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and DUFFY, United States District Judge for the District of South Carolina, sitting by designation. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.2 ARGUED: Glen Marcus Fallin, Westminster, Maryland, for Appellant. Gregory Edward Gaskins, Assistant County Attorney, BALTIMORE COUNTY OFFICE OF LAW, Towson, Maryland, for Appellees. ON BRIEF: Virginia W. Barnhart, County Attorney, BALTIMORE COUNTY OFFICE OF LAW, Towson, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant Glen Marcus Fallin appeals from the district court's order that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1927, he pay sanctions of $540.50 arising out of his legal representation of Robert DiCarlo in a suit brought by DiCarlo against Appellees Baltimore County,Maryland and Wesley P. Martin. Under our well-established precedent, the order of sanctions against Fallin is not appealable absent a final judgment in the underlying litigation. See Wheeler v. Anchor Continental Inc. , 622 F.2d 94, 95 (4th Cir. 1980); Underwriters at Lloyd's v. Suburban Trust Co. , 666 F.2d 55, 58 (4th Cir. 1981). Because no final judgment has been rendered in this case, we dismiss Fallin's appeal for lack of appellate jurisdiction.

SO ORDERED3
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 99.3


                        Report of Independent Accountants


To the Board of Directors of
The Chase Manhattan Bank USA, N.A.

We have examined management's assertion that, as of December 31, 2000, The Chase
Manhattan Bank USA, N.A. maintained an effective system of internal control over
servicing of securitized automobile financing receivables, included in the
accompanying Management Report on Internal Control Over Servicing of Securitized
Automobile Financing Receivables. Management is responsible for maintaining
effective internal control over such functions. Our responsibility is to express
an opinion on management's assertion based on our examination.

Our examination was made in accordance with standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included
obtaining an understanding of the internal control over servicing of securitized
automobile financing receivables, testing and evaluating the design and
operating effectiveness of the internal control, and such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination
provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Because of inherent limitations in any internal control, errors or
irregularities may occur and not be detected. Also, projections of any
evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting to future periods
are subject to the risk that the internal control may become inadequate because
of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or
procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, management's assertion that, as of December 31, 2000, The Chase
Manhattan Bank USA, N.A. maintained an effective system of internal control over
servicing of securitized automobile financing receivables, is fairly stated, in
all material respects, based upon the criteria for effective internal control
described in "Internal Control - Integrated Framework" issued by the Committee
of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.




/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
------------------------------
March 26, 2001
## In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07 - 15 - 00140 - CV RAY WINN, APPELLANT

V. SALLY LAWSON, APPELL EE On Appeal from the County Court at Law No . 1

Bell County, Texas Trial Court No. 74271, Honorable Jeanne Parker, Presiding



### July 11 , 2018 ORDER Before QUINN, C.J., and PIRTLE and PARKER , JJ. On or about June 15, 2018, appellee, Sally Lawson, notified this court that she had filed bankruptcy under Chapter 13 of the United States Bankruptcy Code in United States Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Missouri, Cause No. 17 - 42999. Appellee initiated the bankruptcy proceeding on November 3, 2017 . Given the notice of bankruptcy and Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 8 .2 , this appeal is suspended until further order of this court. The parties are directed to take such action that is appropriate to advise the clerk of this court of any change in the status of2

appellant ’s b ankruptcy proceeding which would affect the status of this appeal, including but not limited to the filing of a Motion to Reinstate . Per Curiam
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 375 

To honor the goal of the International Year of Astronomy, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 20, 2008 

Ms. GIFFORDS submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on Science and Technology 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

To honor the goal of the International Year of Astronomy, 

and for other purposes. 

Whereas the year 2009 represents the 400th Anniversary of 

Galileo’s astronomical use of the telescope; 

Whereas the year 2009 has been designated the International 

Year of Astronomy (IYA) by the United Nations and 

UNESCO; 

Whereas astronomical observations and discoveries have profound implications for the development of science, philosophy, culture, and our general conception of our place in 

the Universe; 

Whereas astronomy is one of the oldest basic sciences and 

contributes fundamentally to the ultimate context of all 

other sciences; 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

2 

•HCON 375 IH 

Whereas astronomy and astronomical discoveries continue to 

capture the imagination of the American people; 

Whereas the United States is the home of the most advanced 

astronomical research in the world; 

Whereas the many creative programs and activities planned 

in the United States for IYA 2009 are strongly supported 

by the staff, missions, and observatories of the National 

Science Foundation and the National Aeronautics and 

Space Administration; 

Whereas science and technology awareness and education 

play a critical role in the economic success of the United 

States; and 

Whereas the astronomical sciences inspire students to study 

science, mathematics, engineering, and technology: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That the Congress— 

3 (1) honors the goal of the International Year of 

4 Astronomy to celebrate astronomical discoveries; 

5 (2) encourages the public to participate in IYA 

6 celebrations and activities and discover more about 

7 the Universe and the science of astronomy; and 

8 (3) applauds the efforts of the employees, cen9 ters, and laboratories of the National Aeronautics 

10 and Space Administration and the National Science 

11 Foundation in promoting public understanding of 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

3 

•HCON 375 IH 

1 the astronomical sciences during the celebration of 

2 the International Year of Astronomy. 

Æ 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
<PAGE>

                                                                  Exhibit 28.1
                    [Chase Manhattan Bank USA, N.A. Logo]

Chase Manhattan Bank USA, N.A.
Wilmington, DE

March 15, 2000


Management Report on Internal Control Over Servicing of Securitized
Automobile Financing Receivables

Management of The Chase Manhattan Bank USA, N.A. is responsible for establishing
and maintaining an effective system of internal control over servicing of
securitized automobile financing receivables, which is designed to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the proper servicing of securitized automobile
financing receivables. The system contains self-monitoring mechanisms, and
actions are taken to correct deficiencies as they are identified.

There are inherent limitations in the effectiveness of any system of internal
control, including the possibility of human error and the circumvention or
overriding of controls. Accordingly, even an effective internal control system
can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to servicing of securitized
automobile financing receivables. Further, because of changes in conditions, the
effectiveness of an internal control system may vary over time.

Management of The Chase Manhattan Bank USA, N.A. assessed its system of internal
control over servicing of securitized automobile financing receivables as of
December 31, 1999 in relation to criteria for effective internal control
described in "Internal Control - Integrated Framework" issued by the Committee
of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this
assessment, management believes that, as of December 31, 1999, the Chase
Manhattan Bank USA, N.A. maintained an effective system of internal control over
servicing of securitized automobile financing receivables.

                                          /s/ Keith Schuck
                                          --------------------------
                                          Keith Schuck
                                          Vice President
                                          Chase Manhattan Bank USA, N.A.