alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 99.1



SCHOOL SPECIALTY, INC.

SCHEDULE II - VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS

FISCAL YEARS ENDED APRIL, 26, 2003, APRIL 24, 2004
AND APRIL 30, 2005



|                                |  |                                            |  |                              |  |                             |  |                         |           |  |                            |              |  |                             |  |                                           
|------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------ |  | ---------------------------- |  | --------------------------- |  | ----------------------- | --------- |  | -------------------------- | ------------ |  | --------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------
|Description                     |  | Date                                       |  | Balance atBeginning ofPeriod |  | Charged toCosts andExpenses |  | Charged toOtherAccounts |           |  | Deductions                 |              |  | Balance atEnd ofPeriod      |  | Date                                      
|Allowance for doubtful accounts |  | April 27, 2002April 26, 2003April 24, 2004 |  | 2,719,0003,796,0006,627,000  |  | 793,000409,000945,000       |  | 934,0002,623,00084,000  | (a)(a)(a) |  | (650,000(201,000(3,591,000 | )(b))(b))(b) |  | 3,796,0006,627,0004,065,000 |  | April 26, 2003April 24, 2004April 30, 2005
|                                |  |                                            |  |                              |  |                             | 
|Restructuring reserve           |  | April 27, 2002April 26, 2003April 24, 2004 |  | 863,000457,000241,000        |  |                          |  |                      |           |  | (406,000(216,000(241,000   | )))          |  | 457,000241,000             |  | April 26, 2003April 24, 2004April 30, 2005

---

|(a) | Allowance for doubtful accounts acquired in purchase acquisitions.
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------

|(b) | Represents write-offs of uncollectable accounts receivable offset by recoveries of previously written-off accounts receivable.
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeals of

-- . ) ) Balfour Beatty/McCarthy, A Joint Venture ) ) Under ContractNo. W9126G-10-C-0087 ) APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT:

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: ASBCA Nos. 61621, 61786

Eric L. Nelson, Esq. Harry Z. Rippon III, Esq.

Smith, Currie and Hancock LLP Atlanta, GA Michael P. Goodman, Esq.

Engineer ChiefTrial Attorney Dawn-Carole Harris, Esq.

Engineer Trial Attorney U.S. Army Engineer District, Fort Worth ORDER OF DISMISSAL The disputes underlying these appeals were successfully resolved through a Board-assisted mediation. The parties'joint motion ofAugust 28, 2019 is granted, and these appeals are dismissed with prejudice. Dated: September 4, 2019

Administrative Judge Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
I certify that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Order ofDismissal ofthe Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals in ASBCA Nos. 61621, 61786, Appeals ofBalfour Beatty/McCarthy, A Joint Venture, rendered in conformance withthe Board's Charter. Dated:
PAULLA K. GATES-LEWIS Recorder, Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
Exhibit 12 (a)

                        BNP U.S. FUNDING L.L.C.

                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

                          (in thousands, except ratios)



                                                          Twelve-month
                                                          period ended
                                                        December 31, 2002
                                                        -----------------

Net income                                                  $ 32,894
                                                              ======
Fixed charges
      Audit fees                                                  25
      Trustee fees                                               166
      Administrative and consulting fees                       1,207
                                                              ------
Total fixed charges                                            1,398
                                                              ------
Earnings before fixed charges                               $ 34,292
                                                              ------
Fixed charges, as above                                        1,398
                                                              ------
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                             24.53
                                                              ------
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.12

                                   MEMORANDUM

This Memorandum, dated as of September 28, 2001 (the "Effective Date"), is by
and among SonoSite, Inc., a corporation of the State of Washington, United
States of America, having a place of business at 21919 30th Drive SE, Bothell,
Washington, 98021-3904 ("SonoSite"), Olympus Optical Co., Ltd., having a place
of business at 2951 Ishikawa-cho, Hachioji-shi, Tokyo, Japan, 192-8507
("Olympus"), and Olympus Promarketing, Inc., having a place of business at 3-4
Kandra-Surugadai, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, Japan, 101-0062 ("OPM").

SonoSite, Olympus, and OPM agree as follows:

1.   Olympus agrees to assign to OPM the distribution agreement entered into by
     and between SonoSite and Olympus, dated August 1, 1999 (the "Distribution
     Agreement"), and OPM agrees to accept such assignment. SonoSite
     acknowledges and agrees that Olympus may assign to OPM the Distribution
     Agreement.



SonoSite, Inc.                           Olympus Optical Co., Ltd.

By:  /s/ Kevin Goodwin                   By: /s/ Takashi Tsukaya
   -------------------------------          ------------------------------------
Name:  Kevin Goodwin                     Name:  Takashi Tsukaya
Title: President & CEO                   Title: Head of Ultrasound Business Unit
Date:  September 28, 2001                Date:  October 5, 2001



Olympus Promarketing, Inc.

By: /s/ Minoru Nagasawa
   -------------------------------
Name:  Minoru Nagasawa
Title: Director
       Executive Director of Endoscope Division
Date:  October 5, 2001
Order entered September 16, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-00569-CV

TERESA WARD COOPER, AS NEXT FRIEND OF JANE DOE/D.T., Appellant

V.

FIRST FINANCIAL BANK, N.A., Appellee

On Appeal from the 380th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 380-01566-2016

ORDER

We REINSTATE this appeal as the findings of fact and conclusions of law for which we 

abated have been filed. 

By motion filed September 13, 2019, appellant has informed the Court she requested 

additional or amended findings and conclusions. Although our order abating the appeal directed 

Collin County District Clerk Lynn Finley to file, no later than September 4, 2019, a supplemental 

clerk’s record containing any request for additional or amended findings and conclusions and 

any additional or amended findings and conclusions, appellant notes no supplemental clerk’s 

record has been filed. Appellant asks we order the supplemental record be filed. 

We GRANT the motion and ORDER Ms. Finley to file a supplemental clerk’s record 

containing the request for additional or amended findings no later than September 26, 2019. The 
supplemental clerk’s record shall also include any additional or amended findings filed by the 

trial court or written verification no such findings were made. As the reporter’s record has been 

filed, we further ORDER appellant to file her opening brief within thirty days of the filing of the 

supplemental clerk’s record.

We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to send a copy of the order to Ms. Finley and the 

parties.

/s/ KEN MOLBERG 

JUSTICE
EXHIBIT 99.1

SCHOOL SPECIALTY, INC.

SCHEDULE II - VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS

FISCAL YEARS ENDED APRIL 25, 2009, APRIL 26, 2008 AND APRIL 28, 2007



|                                |  |                |  |                              |  |                             |  |                         |      |  |            |   |  |                        |  |               
|------------------------------- |  | -------------- |  | ---------------------------- |  | --------------------------- |  | ----------------------- | ---- |  | ---------- | - |  | ---------------------- |  | --------------
|Description                     |  | Date           |  | Balance atBeginning ofPeriod |  | Charged toCosts andExpenses |  | Charged toOtherAccounts |      |  | Deductions |   |  | Balance atEnd ofPeriod |  | Date          
|Allowance for doubtful accounts |  | April 29, 2006 |  | 3,880,000                    |  | 1,270,000                   |  |                        |      |  | (349,000   | ) |  | 4,801,000              |  | April 28, 2007
|                                |  | April 28, 2007 |  | 4,801,000                    |  | 1,101,000                   |  | (926,000                | )(a) |  | (741,000   | ) |  | 4,235,000              |  | April 26, 2008
|                                |  | April 26, 2008 |  | 4,235,000                    |  | 1,411,000                   |  |                        |      |  | (1,314,000 | ) |  | 4,332,000              |  | April 25, 2009
|                                |  |                |  |                              |  |                             | 
|Restructuring reserve           |  | April 29, 2006 |  | 2,329,000                    |  | 590,000                     |  |                        |      |  | (2,694,000 | ) |  | 225,000                |  | April 28, 2007
|                                |  | April 28, 2007 |  | 225,000                      |  |                            |  |                        |      |  | (225,000   | ) |  |                       |  | April 26, 2008
|                                |  | April 26, 2008 |  |                             |  | 3,912,000                   |  |                        |      |  | (2,467,000 | ) |  | 1,445,000              |  | April 25, 2009



|(a) | Represents the allowance for doubtful accounts reduced as a result of the disposal of the School Specialty Media business unit.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fw:Veolia Significant Modification Request and Revised Permit Veolia Significant Modification Request and Revised Permit 

Genevieve Damico Genevieve Damico to: David Ogulei 11/29/2012 07:19 AM

History: This message has been forwarded.

4 attachments

Veolia Sig Mod_November 2012.pdf Veolia SOB_November 2012.pdf

Veolia Fact Sheet 11-28-12.pdf Veolia NOID_November 2012.pdf

 

-----Forwarded by Genevieve Damico/R5/USEPA/US on 11/29/2012 07:19AM -----

 =======================

 To: doug.harris@veoliaes.com

 From: George Czerniak/R5/USEPA/US@EPA

 Date: 11/29/2012 07:05AM

 Cc: Genevieve Damico/R5/USEPA/US@EPA, John Mooney/R5/USEPA/US@EPA

 Subject: Veolia Significant Modification Request and Revised Permit

 =======================

 Mr. Harris:

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has reviewed the February 25, 2010 request by Veolia ES 

Technical Solutions, L.L.C. (Veolia) for a significant modification to Veolia's Title V Permit No. 

V-IL-1716300103-08-01. EPA has made a preliminary determination to deny the feed rate limits 

requested by Veolia, and to incorporate into a revised Title V permit feed rate limits that EPA 

considers to be supported by the available performance test data and federal regulations . EPA has 

also proposed periodic monitoring requirements to ensure compliance with EPA 's proposed feed rate 

limits. 

Enclosed are the preliminary draft significant modification to Permit No . V-IL-1716300103-08-01 

(preliminary draft permit) and a statement of basis for the preliminary draft permit. EPA has 

identified all proposed changes to the permit as "track-changes."

Pursuant to 40 C.F.R. § 71.11(a)(5), the final draft permit must be publicly noticed and made 

available for public comment. EPA is offering you an opportunity to review the preliminary draft 

permit and to voice any specific concerns with the preliminary draft permit prior to the formal start 

of the public comment period. You must submit any comments on the preliminary draft permit by

December 14, 2012. EPA is available to meet with you, prior to December 13, 2012, to discuss any 

concerns you have on the preliminary draft permit. 

This communication does not represent final Agency action to issue or deny a permit to Veolia under 

Title V of the Clean Air Act (Act), or any other kind of final agency action under section 307(b) of the 

Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7607(b). A final decision on your application will be made after consideration of all

relevant public comments.
If you wish to ask any clarifying questions about the preliminary draft permit or set up a meeting 

with EPA prior to December 13, please contact David Ogulei, of my staff, at (312) 353-0987.

Protecting the environment is everyone’s responsibility. Help EPA fight pollution by reporting 

possible harmful environmental activity. To do so, visit EPA’s website at 

http://www.epa.gov/compliance/complaints/index.html
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20

- 7432

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. ANTOINE DEMETRIUS LUNDY, a/k/a Buff , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Norfolk

. Robert G. Doumar , Senior District Judge. ( 2:12

- cr - 00106

- RGD

- DEM

- 3 )

Submitted : May 20, 2021 Decided: May 24, 2021

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER , and MOTZ , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Antoine Demetrius Lundy, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Antoine Demetrius Lundy appeals the district court’s orde r denying h is motion for compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A). We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error

. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Lundy , No. 2 : 12

- cr - 00 106

- RGD

- DEM

- 3 (E.D. Va. Sept. 15, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.
AFFIRMED
No. 62108.

#### Compass Instrument & Optical Co. *v.*United States,

protest 301353-K (New York).

*613Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the issues are the same in all material respects as those the subject of *John P. Herber & Co., Inc. v. United States*(30 Cust. Ct. 193, C. D. 1519), the protest was dismissed, and the matter was remanded to a single judge sitting in reappraisement for determination of the value of the merchandise in the manner provided by law (28 U. S. C. § 2636 (d)).
No. 54904.

#### Fuchs Shoe Corp. *v.*United States,

protests 164188-K, 164190-K, and 165067-K (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items of the merchandise consist of handbags similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Goldberg & Seltzer, Inc.*(36 C. C. P. A. 64, C. A. D. 399), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
#### M. Furuya Co. *v.*United States

No. 8042.

Entered at Portland, Oreg.

Entry No. 170.

(Decided August 22, 1951)

*Lawrence & Tuttle (George R. Tuttle*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*David N. Edelstein,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Olivee, Chief Judge:.

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> It-is hereby stipulated as follows between counsel for plaintiff and the Assistant Attorney General for the United States, concerning the merchandise referred to herein:

> 1) That as to merchandise involved herein, marked “B” on the invoice and initialed JDM by Customs Examiner J. D. MacFarlane the market value or price, át the time of exportation, at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the -principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, plus, when not included in such price, the cost of containers and coverings of whatever nature, and all other costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States, was the invoiced unit prices, packed.

> • 2) That at the time of exportation there was no higher foreign value for this merchandise and that the appraisement made under authority of the Presidential proclamation published in T-D 46158 was not applicable to said merchandise, based upon the decisions in RDs 4444 and 4570,

> 3) That the appeal enumerated above be submitted on this stipulation, being limited to items marked “B” as aforesaid.

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for *427the determination of the value of the merchandise represented on the invoice by the items marked “B” and initialed JDM by Examiner J. D. MacFarlane, and that such values were the invoiced unit prices, packed.

Insofar as the appeal relates to all other merchandise it is hereby dismissed.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           6,394
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   20,256
<ALLOWANCES>                                       740
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                30,092
<PP&E>                                           2,770
<DEPRECIATION>                                     222
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  86,358
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           18,985
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            98
<OTHER-SE>                                      66,401
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    66,499
<SALES>                                         14,189
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                14,189
<CGS>                                            6,374
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,374
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                10,557
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   135
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 220
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,097)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (203)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,894)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,894)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.67)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.67)
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 378 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 378

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas the Wyoming Territorial Legislature passed, and Governor John A. 
        Campbell signed into law on December 10, 1869, a measure stating, ``That 
        every woman of the age of twenty-one years, residing in this territory, 
        may, at every election, to be holden under the law thereof, cast her 
        vote.'';
Whereas this Suffrage Act granted women in the Wyoming Territory the right to 
        vote with full civil and judicial equality to men;
Whereas Louisa Swain, on September 6, 1870, became the Nation's first woman 
        voter under laws guaranteeing absolute political equality to women;
Whereas she cast that vote as a 70 year-old woman in the town of Laramie's 
        municipal election;
Whereas, the Laramie Daily Sentinel wrote, ``It is comforting to note that our 
        first woman voter was really a lady . . . of the highest social standing 
        in the community, universally beloved and respected. The scene was in 
        the highest degree interesting and impressive. There was too much good 
        sense in our community for any jeers or sneers to be seen on such an 
        occasion'';
Whereas this vote was inspirational to the women's suffrage movement and to the 
        cause of civil rights;
Whereas, Wyoming's statehood, in 1890, brought the codification of this suffrage 
        right through the ratification of the new Wyoming State constitution 
        under Article 6, section 1;
Whereas, when the Congress threatened to withhold statehood from Wyoming, 
        territory legislators replied with a telegram stating that Wyoming would 
        remain out of the Union 100 years rather than join without women's 
        suffrage;
Whereas President Benjamin Harrison, on July 10, 1890, signed into law a bill 
        admitting Wyoming into the Union, and recognizing it as the Nation's 
        ``Equality State'';
Whereas these actions instigated a path to the passage of the 19th Amendment to 
        the United States Constitution 50 years after Louisa Swain's historical 
        first vote; and
Whereas September 6, 2008, would be an appropriate date to designate as Louisa 
        Swain Day: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That Congress supports the designation of a Louisa Swain Day.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 27, 2008.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
110th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                            H. CON. RES. 378

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

  Expressing support for designation of September 6, 2008, as Louisa 
                               Swain Day.
```
Before the Third Division,

October 7, 1942

No. 47624.

#### Protest 22263-K of Palomas Cattle Co. (El Paso).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

In view of the Presidential Proclamation (T. D. 49811) and following *Burr*v. *United States*(9 Cust. Ct. 13, C. D. 651) the court held the merchandise was properly assessed inasmuch as the importer appears to have paid duty at 1)4 cents per pound on substantially the same percentage of his importation as the court held applicable in the *Burr*case, *supra,*in which case the importation was entered on the same day as the cattle in the case at bar. The protest was therefore overruled.