alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           6,701
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   6,701
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,033,209)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     6,701
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,371
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                69,247
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (62,876)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (62,876)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Comment Info: =================

General Comment:Please post this letter from Pacific Wings in Docket DOT-OST-1996-1902 and DOT-OST-1996-1903.  Call Kevin at x63176 if you have any questions.
EXHIBIT 4.1


February 23, 2000



Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Judiciary Plaza
Washington, DC 20549

RE: Carnival Corporation
    Commission File No. 1-9610

Gentlemen:

Pursuant to Item 601 (b) (4) (iii) of Regulation S-K promulgated under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, Carnival Corporation (the
"Company") hereby agrees to furnish copies of certain long-term debt instruments
to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon the request of the Commission,
and, in accordance with such regulation, such instruments are not being filed as
part of the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for its fiscal year ended
November 30, 1999.

Very truly yours,

CARNIVAL CORPORATION

/s/ Arnaldo Perez

Arnaldo Perez
General Counsel
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
The  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information   extracted  from  the
registrant's  financial  statements  as of and for the six  month  period  ended
September  28,  1996 and is  qualified  in its  entirety  by  reference  to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-29-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-28-1996
<CASH>                                         3,566,538
<SECURITIES>                                   584,709
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    3,423,745
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               8,554,852
<PP&E>                                         4,702,972
<DEPRECIATION>                                 2,957,656
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 10,568,979
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2,210,900
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       153,175
<OTHER-SE>                                     3,251,049
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   10,568,979
<SALES>                                        8,193,870
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               8,193,870
<CGS>                                          5,303,196
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  5,303,196
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               3,990,007
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (36,931)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,241,130)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,099,177)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,099,177)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.09)
        


</TABLE>
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED SEPTEMBER 22, 2023

NO. 03

- 22

- 00294

- CV

Central Texas Building & Construction Trades Council; International Brotherhood of

Electrical Workers, Local 520; United Association of Plumber s and Pipefitters, Local 286;

International Union of Painters and Allied Trades, District Council 88; Philip Lawhon;

Robin Drake; Riley Drake; David Ervin; Leeroy Hamilton; and Sean Ingram , Appellant s

v.

Bastrop Independent School District; Ashley Mutsch i nk, in his Official Capacity as

President of the Board of Trustees; et al. , Appellee s

APPEAL FROM THE 423RD DISTRICT COURT OF BASTROP COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES BAKER, KELLY AND SMITH

DISMISSED ON APPELLANT S ’ MOTION

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE SMITH

This is an appeal from the order signed by the tr i a l court on April 2 5, 2022

. Appel lants have

filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, and having considered the motion , the Court agrees that the

motion should be granted . Therefore, the Court grants the motion and dismiss es the appeal

. The

appellant s shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court a nd in the court below.
_______________________________________ __ Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

September 23, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh 127660 Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. JOYCE MCDOWELL, as Personal Stephen J. Markman, Representative of the estates of BLAKE Justices BROWN, JOYCE BROWN, and CHRISTOPHER BROWN, deceased, and as Conservator for JONATHON FISH, JOANNE CAMPBELL, and JUANITA FISH, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 127660 COA: 246294 Wayne CC: 00-039668-NO CITY OF DETROIT and the DETROIT HOUSING COMMISSION, Defendants-Appellants.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 9, 2004 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), we

direct the Clerk to schedule oral argument on whether to grant the application or take other peremptory acti on permitted by MCR 7.302(G)(1). The parties shall include among the issues to be addressed at oral argumen t whether the Court of Appeals erred in holding that negligent nuisance is an excep tion to governmental immunity under Hadfield v Oakland County Drain Commissioner , 430 Mich 139 (1988), and whether, if a fire begins in the space between an inner and outer wall of leased p remises, the fire "trespasses" to the tenant's premises when it spreads beyond the inner wa ll. The parties may file supplemental briefs within 28 days of the date of this order, but they should avoid submitting mere restatement of argumen ts in application papers.

d0919 I, CORBIN R. DAVIS, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 23, 2005

Clerk
(Reap. Dec. 9418)

#### Calcon Importing Com*p*any W. J. Byrnes & Co. v. United States

Entry Nos. DE *6456;*DE 9273.

*635(Decided May 12, 1959)

*Low & Stone*for the plaintiffs.

*George Goohran Lotih,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Chief Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement relates to certain toys exported from Western Germany and entered at the port of Los Angeles, Calif.

Stipulated facts, upon which the case has been submitted, establish that foreign value, as defined in section 402(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, is the proper basis for appraisement of the merchandise in question, and that such statutory value for these items is the unit invoiced values, less nondutiable charges, packing included, and I so hold.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE

30–907 WASHINGTON : 2018

115th Congress, 2d Session – – – – – – – – – – – – House Document 115–144 

GALVESTON HARBOR CHANNEL EXTENSION—FEASIBILITY STUDY, HOUSTON-GALVESTON NAVIGATION 

CHANNELS, TEXAS 

COMMUNICATION

FROM

THE ASSISTANT UNDER SECRETARY OF THE 

ARMY, CIVIL WORKS, DEPARTMENT OF 

DEFENSE

TRANSMITTING

THE CORPS’ REPORT ON GALVESTON HARBOR CHANNEL EXTENSION—FEASIBILITY STUDY, HOUSTON-GALVESTON NAVIGATION 

CHANNELS, TEXAS, FOR FEBRUARY 2017, PURSUANT TO 33 

U.S.C. 549a; PUBLIC LAW 91–611, SEC. 216; (84 STAT. 1830) 

JULY 27, 2018.—Referred to the Committee on Transportation and 

Infrastructure and ordered to be printed 

(III)
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
XI
XII
XIII
XIV
(1)
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
```

[106th Congress Public Law 334]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

<DOC>
[DOCID: f:publ334.106]

[[Page 114 STAT. 1308]]

Public Law 106-334
106th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
   3500 Dolfield Avenue in Baltimore, Maryland, as the ``Judge Robert 
      Bernard Watts, Sr. Post Office Building''. <<NOTE: Oct. 19, 
                         2000 -  [H.R. 4448]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 3500 
Dolfield Avenue in Baltimore, Maryland, shall be known and designated as 
the ``Judge Robert Bernard Watts, Sr. Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Judge Robert Bernard Watts, 
Sr. Post Office Building''.

    Approved October 19, 2000.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 4448:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 146 (2000):
            Sept. 6, considered and passed House.
            Oct. 6, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
No. 51195.

#### Protests 58086-K, etc., of Cluett Peabody & Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

Upon consideration of the arguments presented by plaintiff on rehearing and in view of the fact that the motion for rehearing was not opposed by the Government, the decision heretofore rendered was modified and the protests sustained as to all the entries involved.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   Exhibit 10.x

                          EIGHTH AMENDMENT TO THE HUFFY
                  CORPORATION SUPPLEMENTAL/EXCESS BENEFIT PLAN


         WHEREAS, Huffy Corporation (the "Sponsor") maintains the Huffy
Corporation Supplemental/Excess Benefit Plan (the "Plan") effective January 1,
1988; and

         WHEREAS, the Sponsor desires to amend the Plan;

         NOW, THEREFORE, the Sponsor adopts the following amendment to the Plan
effective as of February 12, 1998:

I.       Exhibit C to the Plan shall be amended by restating the first paragraph
         to read as follows:

                  The Employer shall grant Graber (a) two (2) years of
                  additional Credited Service under the Retirement Plan, plus
                  (b) in addition to the Credited Service granted under (a), two
                  (2) years of Credited Service for each one (1) full year of
                  Actual Service under the Retirement Plan completed during
                  Graber's first five years of employment with the Employer. For
                  purposes of this Exhibit C only, Actual Service shall mean
                  service while on active payroll, salary continuation or
                  long-term disability. Thus, upon Graber's fifth anniversary
                  with the Employer, Graber shall have twelve (12) years of
                  additional Credited Service in addition to the five (5) years
                  of Actual Service completed, for a total of seventeen (17)
                  years of Credited Service.

II.      In all other respects, the Plan shall remain unchanged.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Sponsor has caused this instrument to be
executed as of this 12th day of February, 1998.

                                                     HUFFY CORPORATION

                                                     By:___________________

                                                     Title:________________
#### Newell *versus*Ayer & *al.*

Though the conduct of a juror may, in some respect, he at variance from the requirements of the court, yet, if it do not appear that some injury to either party could have resulted from it, it is not a sufficient ground to require a new trial.

A message was sent by the jury 'to the Judge, that they were not likely to agree upon a verdict and the officer, under direction of the Judge, opened the door and apprised the jury that they were called into court. It was then said by one of the jury that they could probably agree, and the Judge, on being notified of it, recalled the order. While the door was thus opened, two of the jurors left the room for a minute or two, and then returned, after which a verdict was agreed upon.

For this cause, a motion was made for a new trial.

The two jurors testified that, their absence was upon a needful occasion, and that, while absent, they had no conversation with any person.

Wells, J.,

orally.—Where misconduct on the part of jurors has been of injury to a party, it is the duty of the court to set aside their verdict. It was misconduct in the two jurors to leave their room without permission of the court. But they held no conversation with any one, and it does not appear that any injury could have resulted from their act.

*The motion is overruled.*
#### Frederick Richards (Greenwood Mills, Inc.) *v.*United States

No. 8025.

Entered at Charleston, S. C.

Entry Nos. 51; 61; 69.

(Decided July 17, 1951)

*Sharretts, HilUs & Paley (Howard, O. Garter*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*David N. Edelstein,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Chief Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between counsel for the plaintiff and the Assistant Attorney General for the United States, that the market value or the price, at the time of exportation to the United States of the merchandise covered by the appeals to reappraisement enumerated on schedule “A” hereto attached and made a part hereof, at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantity and in the ordinary course of trade, for. consumption in the country of exportation, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed, ready for shipment to the United States, was in each instance the appraised *406value less the amount added in each instance to meet advances made by the appraiser in similar cases and that there is no higher export value.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED-, that these appeals to reap-praisement be submitted on this stipulation.

On the agreed facts I find the foreign value, as that value is defined in section 402 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Administrative Act of 1938, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such value in each instance was the appraised value, less the amount added in each instance to meet advances made by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
### Availability of ground water in the Gallup area, New Mexico

By: Samuel Wilson West

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/cir443

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Union
Carbide Corporation's Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended March 31, 1999, and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<CIK> 0000100790
<NAME> UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                              33
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      997
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        571
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  1874
<PP&E>                                            8509
<DEPRECIATION>                                    4290
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    7292
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             1434
<BONDS>                                           1796
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           156
<OTHER-SE>                                        2271
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      7292
<SALES>                                           1402
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  1402
<CGS>                                             1032
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     1032
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   141<F1>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  31
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    148
<INCOME-TAX>                                        38
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 77
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                           20
<NET-INCOME>                                        57
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.43
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.42
<FN>
<F1>Other expenses are equal to research and development of 37 and depreciation and
amortization of 104.
</FN>


</TABLE>