alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1



TWL CORPORATION



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of TWL Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Dennis J. Cagan, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:

May 22, 2007



/s/Dennis J. Cagan



Dennis J. Cagan



Chief Executive Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to TWL Corporation and will be retained by it and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

In the Matter of Philip Putter 

2013EA110075 

Judge Not Assigned 

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE 

RE EIVED 

MAK 1 2 2015 

HEARING DOCKET 

Complainant, Federal Aviation Administration, hereby notifies the United States 

Department of Transportation, Office of Hearings, and the Respondent, pursuant to 14 

C.P.R. §13.204(b), that it shall be represented in the above-stated action by the attorney 

listed below. All conununications, pleadings or documents are respectf<1lly requested to be 

forwarded as follows: 

Judith L. Vaughan 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Office of Regional Counsel 

1 Aviation Plaza 

Jamaica, NY 11434 

Telephone: 718 553-3255 

Facsimile: 718 995-5699 

Respectfully submitted, 

Alfred R. Johnson, Jr. 

Regional Counsel 

3/; o/; .;- Dated: 1 / '._J --1----,/L..__ __ 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certifY that on this )/) -i- day of March, 2015, copies of the foregoing 

Notice of Appearance has been served upon the following via Federal Express: 

ORIGINAL AND ONE COPY TO: 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Wilbur Wright Building -Suite 2Wl000 

600 Independence Avenue, SW 

Washington DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

COPY TO: 

Lawrence R. DiGiansante (Attorney for Respondent) 

984 Morris Park Avenue 

Bronx, NY 10462 

. Hooks 

legal Specialist 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Office of Regional Counsel 

1 Aviation Plaza 

Jamaica, NY 11434 

2
Exhibit 11
VARLEN CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Computation of Per Share Earnings
Unaudited
(Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                     Three Months Ended   Six Months Ended 
Primary Earnings Per Share:           8/2/97    8/3/96    8/2/97    8/3/96

<S>                                    <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>
Net earnings                           5,438     5,900     10,447    10,722

Computation of the Weighted Average
Number of Shares Outstanding as Used
in the Primary Earnings Per Share
Computation:

Weighted average number of shares
 outstanding                           5,788     5,774      5,783     5,814

Shares assumed issued under the
 treasury stock method                   323       242        278       240

Weighted average number of shares
 outstanding, as adjusted              6,111     6,016      6,061     6,054


Primary Earnings Per Share:             0.89      0.98       1.72      1.77


Fully Diluted Earnings Per Share:

Reconciliation of net earnings per
 the condensed consolidated financial
 statements to the amount used for
 the fully diluted computation:

 Net earnings                          5,438      5,900    10,447   10,722

 Add interest on 6.5% convertible
  subordinated debentures, net of
  income tax effects                     682        680     1,372    1,383

 Net earnings, as adjusted             6,120      6,580    11,819   12,105

Computation of the Weighted Average
 Number of Shares Outstanding as
 Used in the Fully Diluted Earnings
 Per Share Computation:

 Weighted average number of shares
  outstanding                          5,788      5,774     5,783    5,814

 Shares assumed issued under the
  treasury stock method                  363       241        359      240

 Shares issuable from assumed 
  exercise of 6.5% convertible 
  subordinated debenture               3,055     3,055      3,055    3,055

 Weighted average number of shares
  outstanding, as adjusted             9,206     9,070      9,197    9,109


Fully Diluted Earnings Per Share:       0.66      0.73       1.29     1.33

</TABLE>
#### United States *v.*General Electric Co.

No. 6043.

Invoices dated Montreal, Canada, December 7, 1943, etc.

Entered at New Bedford, Mass., January 1, 1944, etc.

Entry No. N-22, etc.

(Decided August 8, 1944)

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General *(Daniel I. Auster,*special attorney),' for the plaintiff.

*Johnson, Clapp, Ives & Knight (Henry F. Knight*and *Ilervey W. King*of counsel) for the defendant.

Oliver, Presiding Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement have been submitted for decision upon tbe following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between counsel for the respective parties hereto, subject to the approval of the court, that the total cost of production provided for in sec. 402 (f)-, Tariff Act of 1930, for merchandise such as or similar to the radio parts herein below enumerated, is as follows:

> Radio Part No. 114371-1 $78.54, Canadian currency per thousand, net, packed

> Radio Part No. 112270-1 $95.40, Canadian currency per thousand, net, packed

> It is further stipulated and agreed that such or similar merchandise was not, at the time of exportation of the instant merchandise, freely offered for sale either for home consumption in Canada or for exportation to the United States, or freely offered for sale, packed, ready for delivery in the principal market of the United States.

> It is further agreed that this case may be submitted on the foregoing stipulation.

.On tbe agreed facts I find tbe cost of production, as that value is *363defined in section 402 (f) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are as follows:

> Radio Part-No. 114371-1 $78.54, Canadian currency per thousand, net, packed

> Radio Part No. 112270-1 $95.40, Canadian currency per thousand, net, packed

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
No. 62099.

#### Armour and Company *v.*United States,

protests 259041-K and 252364-K (Portland, Oreg.).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the-merchandise consists of meats, prepared or preserved, not specially provided for, similar in all material respects to the meat the subject of *United States*v. *Mercantil Distribuidora, S. A., et al.*(45 C. C. P. A. 20, C. A. D. 667), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
!"#$%#&'#(#))#%*# 

))#+ 




 !"

#$%$&''()'	&'()'		*

+)

$

,$

)$

-+,

 &$./*01$$$$23

,$$$

,,45$6,$$$

$7

")

))5

8,$

9,

0$

)5,$6

8

,!"9:

8!"9;4,"$

5

$



 $$*

5<=<#

$

,$,5

,8

<=<#$=,
	

	

))



.$""

,!"95:

,,

"":,$

,,$

,(!+,, 459*

,45)

,$!,!"8$

,%



.

5$<)

5,

>($=,

,5

5,,,$5

,$

;,,,

,,)$;

0,

8$%,,?.



89

,$;,!"

$

,9

$,

<=<#$$

5

<=<#

4"

;5:$!"

$

#-#)! #'*!##%*# +15

!",,)

5

5$

!"

$<,

,

+!"

,

=!"58
	

	

)	)



$

=,



,<=<#$

@

 

,8,<=<#

	 * '*$

 

,$

 ,0

5

,$

 !"

:!A

BA$

 

),,

,!"

0$,

$

,9,

,$





(./&'

 =,


""

+

$ !"#$%$&''()'	&'()'		

*$,)

$

 A1)

,

,
A,$

 6!"9

8,1$
	

	

)')

+

$!"

.,

,$

 ),

$

 !"C"",,

)

&DD.#!

@CC$$CCC#!C'
$

1,$=

""1)

8,

$

E$

,8$

(#'%),#(!)

 ,

$<=<#	 * '*'
A<#&.$&
8<#

$%

,!",

,,$

 %,

!"$

 

<=8

$

"%*&#)&'
*&.*&/!#

 A1

,$

,5

&D&
F,6;5,

G

@CC$$CC!;CC8,C!

;A8$0<0,G

@CC$$CC8$:A

@CC$$CCC8,H

$$

 A0,A,

@CC$$C$
	

	

).)

@CC$CCC$0

@CC8,$$$C<C<&
H#;$$

 !"9:>(6;,

,1

@CC$$CCCC

 !",&DDD

0B

@CC$$CCCHH$

,0

@CC$$CCCCC$,

,

,)

@CC$$CCCC

@CC$$C
DCC$$A

=#=;,&DD'

@CC$$CCC
>''$I$

;,

$

 A0,,%#A

&DD
 @CC5$$C$JHK&

(*&D(D

 @CC5$$C$JHK

	*&D(


@CC5$$C$JHK&D
'

#-#)! #%*# 

,5,

$%8!"5

@

&$=,5

,)$

$!

$A,

,$

	$=

,$=

8

$
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Angela SMITH, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 04-20563.

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Sept. 30, 2005.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Angela Smith, Houston, TX, pro se.

Before BARKSDALE, STEWART and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Angela Smith appeals the sentence imposed following her guilty-plea conviction for possession with the intent to distribute a quantity of crack cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(B). Finding no reversible error, we AFFIRM.

Smith argues that, in light of *United States v. Booker,*— U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), the district court reversibly erred in imposing a sentence utilizing the Sentencing Guidelines as mandatory. Smith contends that she preserved the issue at her sentencing hearing by citing *Blakely v. Washington,*542 U.S. 296, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004), in connection with a request she made to the court that did not involve the court’s determination of her sentence. This argument lacks merit because Smith’s request was not relevant to her invocation of *Blakely*and also because counsel stated that there was no defense objection to the presentence report.

Since Smith did not preserve a *Booker*issue, we review only for plain error. *See United States v. Mares,*402 F.3d 511, 520 (5th Cir.2005), *petition for cert. filed*(Mar. 31, 2005) (No. 04-9517). Application of the Guidelines as mandatory in determining a defendant’s sentence is plain or obvious error after *Booker. See United States v. Valenzuela-Quevedo,*407 F.3d 728, 732-34 (5th Cir.2005), *petition for cert. filed*(July *63225, 2005) (No. 05-5556). However, Smith cannot show that the error affected her substantial rights because the record does not indicate that the district court would have imposed a lower sentence under an advisory, rather than a mandatory, guideline scheme. Therefore, Smith is not entitled to relief on grounds of plain error. *See id.*at 733-34.

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5 the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 146 

Expressing the sense of Congress that the Secretary of Transportation may 

not grant authority to Mexico-domiciled motor carriers to operate beyond 

the commercial zones of the United States-Mexico border. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 9, 2007 

Mr. GOODE (for himself and Mr. JONES of North Carolina) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 

Transportation and Infrastructure 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of Congress that the Secretary of 

Transportation may not grant authority to Mexico-domiciled motor carriers to operate beyond the commercial 

zones of the United States-Mexico border. 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that the Sec3 retary of Transportation may not grant authority to Mex4 ico-domiciled motor carriers to operate beyond the com5 mercial zones of the United States-Mexico border. 

Æ 


hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS
Before the Second Division,

June 1, 1961

No. 65730.

#### John L. Westland & Son, Inc., a/c Ralph’s Bicycle Store et al. *v.*United States,

protests 59/2871, etc. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Schmidt Pritchard & Co. et al.*(47 C.C.P.A. 152, C.A.D. 750), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
<PAGE>

Date: August 13,1999
Amount: $50,000.00

                        Ultimate Sports Entertainment, Inc.
                              (A Delaware Corporation)

                                  Promissory Note

Ultimate Sports Entertainment, Inc., a corporation duly organized and
existing under the laws of the State of Delaware, for value received, hereby
promises to pay the following registered holder hereof at the address stated,

     James Skalko
     136 Vista Oak Dr.
     Longwood, FL 32779

the principal sum of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00) in such lawful money
of the United States of America as at the time of payment shall be legal
tender for the payment of public and private debts, on the terms and at the
time hereinafter provided.

     This Note is subject to the following terms and provisions:

     1. Payment and Interest. The principal amount of this Note together with
all interest then accrued shall be due and payable in six months from the
date hereof (the "Due Date"). Interest on the outstanding principal shall
accrue at the rate of twelve percent (12%) per annum from the date hereof.
All interest shall be calculated on the basis of a 36$day year, counting the
actual number of days elapsed from the date of this Note to the Due Date.
Interest on any overdue payments of principal and interest due hereunder
shall accrue and be payable at the rate of twelve percent (12%) per annum,
based on the actual number of days elapsed from the date such principal or
interest payment was due to the date of actual payment.

     2. Negotiability and Transferability. This Note is negotiable and
transferable.


                                       Ultimate Sports Entertainment, Inc.


                                       By /s/ Frederick R. Licht
                                          -----------------------------
                                          Frederick R. Licht, President
(Reap. Dec. 8841)

#### Carbons, Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 701863, etc.

(Decided June 13, 1957)

*Fred Bennett; Jordan & Klingaman,*associate counsel; for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Johnson, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule “A,” hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the parties hereto, subject to the approval of the court,

> 1- That all the merchandise on the entries the subject of the reappraisement appeals enumerated in the schedule hereto annexed and made a part hereof consists of arc light carbons imported from France.

> 2- That the issues in the aforesaid appeals are the same in all material respects as those decided in *Bert Friedberg & Company*v. *United States,*R. D. 8590, and that the record in the said R. D. 8590 may be incorporated in the record in each of the aforesaid appeals.

> 3- That the appraised value of the merchandise in each of the aforesaid appeals, less 15.35 per cent, is equal to the price, at the time of exportation of such merchandise to the United States, at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale for home consumption to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature, and all other costs, charges, and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States, and that, on or about the dates of exportation of the merchandise herein involved, merchandise such as or similar thereto was not sold or offered for sale in the country of exportation for export to the United States.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the reappraisement appeals herein may be submitted on the foregoing stipulation.

On the agreed facts I find the foreign value, as that value is defined in section 402 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by section 8 of the Customs Administrative Act of 1938, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such value in each instance was the appraised value, less 15.35 per centum.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Commercial Mortgage  Servicing**D1050-084, 8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|--------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 **ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

Reference is hereby made to thatcertain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of May 1, 2016, by and amongJ.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp., as Depositor, WellsFargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, Midland Loan Services, ADivision of PNC Bank, National Association, as Special Servicer, Wells FargoBank, National Association, as Certificate Administrator, Wilmington Trust,National Association,  as Trustee, and Pentalpha Surveillance LLC, asOperating Advisor and as Asset Representations Reviewer, with respect toCommercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2016-C2 (the"Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise definedshall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 11.09 ofthis Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of CommercialMortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1. A review of the activitiesof the Master Servicer during the period from May 1, 2016 through December 31,2016 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance per theAgreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and 

 

2. To the best of myknowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of itsobligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

  

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, theundersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2017.

  

 

/s/ Daniel Bober

Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President 

Wells Fargo Bank

  

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll  go far |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------|
**Exhibit      32.1**

| (1)   | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company                for the periods reflected therein. |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                 |                                                                      |                                                    |
|--------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------|
|                                 |                                                                      |
|                            |                                                                 |                                               |
| Date:              November 14, 2006 |                                                                      | /s/ Harvey              B.              Grossblatt |
|                                 | Harvey                B. GrossblattChief                Executive Officer |
|   |                                                               |                                             |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                          | /s/ James              B.              Huff |
|   | James                B. HuffChief                Financial Officer |

----
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 335 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 335

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 5, 2008

   Received and referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
  Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for a celebration of the 
     100th anniversary of Alpha Kappa Alpha Sorority, Incorporated.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. USE OF CAPITOL GROUNDS FOR 100TH ANNIVERSARY CELEBRATION OF 
              ALPHA KAPPA ALPHA SORORITY, INCORPORATED.

    (a) In General.--Alpha Kappa Alpha Sorority, Incorporated (in this 
resolution referred to as the ``spon-

              

sor''), shall be permitted to sponsor a public event (in this 
resolution referred to as the ``event'') on the Capitol Grounds to 
celebrate the 100th anniversary of Alpha Kappa Alpha Sorority, 
Incorporated.
    (b) Date of Event.--The event shall be held on July 17, 2008, or on 
such other date as the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the 
Committee on Rules and Administration of the Senate jointly designate.

SEC. 2. TERMS AND CONDITIONS.

    (a) In General.--Under conditions to be prescribed by the Architect 
of the Capitol and the Capitol Police Board, the event shall be--
            (1) free of admission charge and open to the public; and
            (2) arranged not to interfere with the needs of Congress.
    (b) Expenses and Liabilities.--The sponsor shall assume full 
responsibility for all expenses and liabilities incident to all 
activities associated with the event.

SEC. 3. EVENT PREPARATIONS.

    Subject to the approval of the Architect of the Capitol, the 
sponsor is authorized to erect upon the Capitol Grounds such stage, 
sound amplification devices, and other related structures and equipment 
as may be required for the event.

SEC. 4. ENFORCEMENT OF RESTRICTIONS.

    The Capitol Police Board shall provide for enforcement of the 
restrictions contained in section 5104(c) of title 40, United States 
Code, concerning sales, advertisements, displays, and solicitations on 
the Capitol Grounds, as well as other restrictions applicable to the 
Capitol Grounds, in connection with the event.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 4, 2008.

            Attest:

                                            LORRAINE C. MILLER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Respondent

 v.

QUANN WHITE,

 Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 933 MAL 2014

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 17th day of June, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED.