alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Armando MORA-SILVA, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 04-30335.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 1, 2005.*

Decided Aug. 4, 2005.

George F. Darragh, Jr., Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Great Falls, MT, for Plaintiff—-Appellee.

Michael Donahoe, Esq., Federal Defenders of Montana, Helena, MT, for Defendant—Appellant.

Before O’SCANNLAIN, CALLAHAN and BEA, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Armando Mora-Silva appeals his sentence imposed following his guilty plea to unlawfully entering the United States after having been previously deported in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a).

Mora-Silva’s Sixth Amendment challenge to his sentencing enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b) remains foreclosed after *United States v. Booker,*— U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005). *See United States v. Moreno-Hernandez,*No. 03-30387, — F.3d -, - n. 8, 2005 WL 1560269, *8 n. 8 (9th Cir. July 5, 2005) (explaining that a district judge’s enhancement of a sentence, based on the fact of a prior conviction under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2, does not raise any Sixth Amendment problems).

Because Mora-Silva was sentenced under the then-mandatory Sentencing Guidelines, and we cannot reliably determine from the record whether the sentence imposed would have been materially different *62had the district court known that the Guidelines were advisory, we remand to the district court to answer that question, and to proceed pursuant to *United States v. Ameline,*409 F.3d 1073, 1084 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc). *See United States v. Moreno-Hernandez, id,*at -, at *9 (extending *Ameline’a*limited remand procedure to cases involving non-constitutional *Booker*error).

REMANDED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Bureau of Labor Statistics

Series Id:

Series title:

Labor force status:

Type of data:

Age:

Years:

Year Qtr1 Qtr2 Qtr3 Qtr4 Annual

2011 20445

Civilian noninstitutional population

Number in thousands

40 to 44 years

2011 to 2011

Labor Force Statistics from the Current Population Survey

Original Data Value

LNU00024935Q

Not Seasonally Adjusted

(Unadj) Population Level - 40-44 yrs.

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics Generated on: May 16, 2011 (02:09:04 PM)
# United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT



## No. 23

- 5049 September Term, 2023

F ILED O N : D ECEMBER 19, 2023

M ONTE S ILVER AND M ONTE S ILVER

, L TD

., AN I SRAELI CORPORATION

, A PPELLANTS

v.

U

NITED S TATES OF A MERICA

, A PPELLEE

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Columbia (No. 1:22

- cv

- 00013)

Before: H ENDERSON and K ATSAS

, Circuit Judges , and R ANDOLPH

, Senior Circuit Judge

.

J U D G M E N T

This case was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs and oral arguments of the parties. The court has afforded the issues full consideration and determined they do not warrant a publis hed opinion. See D.C. C IR

. R. 36(d). For the following reasons, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the district court’s judgment of dismissal be affirmed for the reasons stated by the district court in the January 30, 2023, memorandum opinion in support

thereof

. Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36(d), this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is

directed to withhold issuance of the manda te until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See F ED

. R. A PP

. P. 41(b); D.C. C IR

. R. 41(a)(1).

Per Curiam

FOR THE COURT: Mark J. Langer, Clerk

BY : /s/ Daniel J. Reidy Deputy Clerk
### Routes to desert watering places in the Salton Sea Region, California

By: John Stafford Brown

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp490A

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
No. 65729.

#### Excelsior Pearl Works, Inc., and Chas. H. Asche & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 61/742 (New York).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of manufactures of shell similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Charles A. Redden, Inc., et al.*v. *United States*(44 Cust. Ct. 241, C.D. 2181), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
### Water resources of Jackson and Independence Counties, Arkansas

By: Donald R. AlbinMarion S. HinesJohn W. Stephens

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1839G

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D17-4968

_____________________________

KERRICK VAN TEAMER,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County.

Thomas V. Dannheisser, Judge.

April 24, 2019

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF, WINOKUR, and JAY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, Kathleen Stover, Assistant Public 

Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Steven E. Woods, Assistant 

Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
No. 50698.

#### Protests 54469-K, etc., of Macmillan Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the court found that the facts herein agreed upon were such as to bring the case within the holding in *John Barr*v. *United States*(11 Cust. Ct. 88, C. D. 801), which record was incorporated herein. (See *John Barr*v. *United States,*324 U. S. 83, decided February 5, 1945.) In accordance therewith it was held that the currency of the invoices should be converted at the buying rate in the New York market at noon on the day of exportation (the “free” rate of exchange for pounds sterling), as certified by the Federal Reserve bank and set forth by the collector on each of the entries. The protests were sustained to this extent.
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 197 

Commending the Hispanic Heritage Foundation for recognizing the next 

generation of Latino role models for their academic achievements and 

community service. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 1, 2007 

Mr. GRIJALVA submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Commending the Hispanic Heritage Foundation for recognizing the next generation of Latino role models for 

their academic achievements and community service. 

Whereas the Hispanic Heritage Youth Awards were founded 

in 1998 by the Hispanic Heritage Foundation to identify 

and promote the next generation of Latino role models; 

Whereas recipients of the Hispanic Heritage Youth Awards 

are selected from among graduating high school seniors 

on the basis of their academic achievement, community 

service, and other factors in the following categories: academic excellence, community service, education, engineering and mathematics, health care, journalism, and sports; 

Whereas recipients of the Hispanic Heritage Youth Awards 

enter the LOFT (Latinos on Fast Track) initiative and 


cnoel on PRODPC75 with BILLS
2 

•HCON 197 IH 

develop sustainable relationships with top young professionals who provide the recipients with support and guidance in becoming successful professionals; 

Whereas nearly 40 percent of the entire Latino population is 

less than 18 years of age; 

Whereas it is in the national interest to identify and promote 

the next generation of Latino leaders and role models by 

celebrating their accomplishments in the classroom and 

community; and 

Whereas the Hispanic Heritage Youth Awards has recognized 

more than 1,000 young leaders: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That the Congress commends the Hispanic 

3 Heritage Foundation for recognizing the next generation 

4 of Latino role models for their academic achievements and 

5 community service. 

Æ 


cnoel on PRODPC75 with BILLS
No. 53216.

#### Chew Chong Tai & Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 78418-K, etc. (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract’'l5400 the court dismissed the protests.
| (logo)  WELLS FARGO | **CMBS  Department**

 

MAC  N9401-011

1055  10th Avenue SE

Minneapolis,  MN 55414 |
|---------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

MorganStanley Capital I Inc. 

1585BROADWAY

NEWYORK, New York 10036-8200

 

RE:Annual Statement of Compliance for Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc., CommercialMortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2015-UBS8

 

Perthe Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of December 1, 2015 (the“Agreement”), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of WellsFargo Bank, N.A., as Custodian (“Wells Fargo”), hereby certifies asfollows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2016 (the “ReportingPeriod”):

 

(a)A review of Wells Fargo’s activities during the Reporting Period and ofits performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer’ssupervision; and

 

(b)To the best of such officer’s knowledge, based on such review, WellsFargo has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all materialrespects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

February27, 2017

 

/s/Gail Vannest

GAILVANNEST

VicePresident

 

 

WellsFargo Bank, N.A.
Case No. 13,357.

#### In re STEINMAN.

[6 Biss. 166; 110 N. B. R. 214; 6 Chi. Leg. News, 338; 31 Leg. Int. 269; 21 Pittsb. Leg. J. 200.]

District Court, N. D. Illinois.

July, 1874.

Bankruptcy — Denial op Same — Statement of-Creditoks — Verification.

Since the amendment to the bankrupt act of' June-22. 1874 [18 Stat. 178], a statement of his creditors filed by the debtor on denial of bankruptcy must be verified.

In bankruptcy. [In the matter of Louis E. Steinman, a bankrupt.] This was a creditor’s-petition filed previous to the passage of the-amendment of June 22, 1S74, and amended immediately thereafter by adding new petitioning creditors and inserting the required allegations as to the number and amount of' creditors.

Adolph' Moses, for debtor,

on the return day of the rule to show cause to the amended petition, presented a denial that the requisite-number of creditors had joined in the petition,, with -a -list of creditors annexed. The denial, was not verified.

J. H. Bissell, for petitioning creditors.

*1242BLODGETT, District Judge.

Although the law does not expressly require that the list of creditors presented by the debtor, in denial that the requisite number and amount have joined in the petition, should be sworn to by him, the general intent of the act would seem to indicate that it should be done. Where the petitioning creditors have made out a prima facie case, if the debtor wishes to deny it, he should do so under oath, as the list of his creditors must be particularly within his own knowledge, and the petitioners are entitled to the benefit of a sworn list, that they may have some assurance that fictitious claims are not inserted.

The practice in this district will be uniformly to require the list of creditors filed by the debtor to be properly verified.

NOTE. The amendment of June 22<1, 1874, does not require the denial of the debtor, that the petitioners constitute the requisite proportion of his creditors, to be sworn to, but in the absence of a rule of the supreme court on the point, it is proper to require such .denial to be verified by the oath of the debtor, and for like reasons the list of his creditors filed by the debtor should be verified in like manner. In re Hymes [Case No. 6,986].
Exhibit 32

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

      Pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsection (a)
      and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each
      of the undersigned officers of Canal Capital Corporation and Subsidiaries,
      a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify that:

      The Quarterly Report of Form 10-Q for the three months ended July 31, 2006
      (the "Form 10-Q") of the Company fully complies with the  requirements  of
      section  13(a)  or  15(d)  of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of  1934  and
      information  contained in the Form 10-Q fairly  presents,  in all material
      respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results  of  operations  of the
      Company.


Date: September 13, 2006                     /S/ Michael E. Schultz
                                             -----------------------
                                             Chief Executive Officer


Date: September 13, 2006                     /S/ Reginald Schauder
                                             -----------------------
                                             Chief Financial Officer


                                       46
#### James R. JONES, Jr., Appellant, v. CITY OF KANSAS CITY, MISSOURI; Wayne Cauthen, City Manager of Kansas City, Missouri, Appellees.

No. 04-3424.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 7, 2005.

Decided Sept. 22, 2005.

James R. Jones, Jr., Kansas City, MO, pro se.

George Steven Diegel, City Attorney’s Office, Kansas City, MO, for Appellees.

Before MELLOY, MAGILL, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

James R. Jones, Jr. brought this employment-discrimination action alleging that the City of Kansas City, Missouri (City) had failed to compensate him at the appropriate level because of his age. He filed the action after the district court1
      *736dismissed his earlier employment-discrimination suit in which he claimed that, during the same period, the City had failed to promote him because of his age. *See Jones v. City of Kansas City, Mo.,*Civ. No. 04-310 (W.D. Mo. June 17, 2004) *(Jones I).*The City moved to dismiss Jones’s action as precluded by *Jones I*under the doctrine of res judicata. The district court granted the City’s motion to dismiss. Jones appeals.

We review de novo a dismissal on res judicata grounds, *see Lundquist v. Rice Mem’l Hosp.,*238 F.3d 975, 976-77 (8th Cir.2001), and we agree with the district court’s conclusion that the instant suit is res judicata barred: Jones’s claim that he is entitled to higher compensation arises out of the same nucleus of operative facts as those at issue in *Jones I, see Daley v. Marriott Int’l, Inc.,*415 F.3d 889, 896 (8th Cir.2005), and could have been raised in *Jones I, see Lundquist,*238 F.3d at 977 (8th Cir.2001). After careful consideration, we also conclude that Jones’s other arguments do not provide any basis for reversal.

Accordingly, we affirm. *See*8th Cir. R. 47B.

. The Honorable Gary A. Fenner, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1999
<CASH>                                          63,861
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,303,778
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  4,128,504
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,496,143
<PP&E>                                       3,961,157
<DEPRECIATION>                             (2,313,110)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,144,190
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,090,884
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       816,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,237,306
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,144,190
<SALES>                                      5,164,648
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,222,940
<CGS>                                        4,148,627
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,148,627
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               758,253
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                316,060
<INCOME-TAX>                                   124,007
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            192,053
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   192,053
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
# C_2018042EN.01001301.xml

| 5.2.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 42/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.2.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 42/13

---

Judgment of the General Court of 13 December 2017 — Oltis Group v Commission

(Case T-497/15) (1)

1

((Research and development - Framework Programme for Research and Innovation 2014-2020 (Horizon 2020) - Stimulation and coordination of EU research and innovation investments in the rail sector - Establishment of the Shift2Rail Joint Undertaking - Associate membership of the Shift2Rail Joint Undertaking - Call for expressions of interest - Rejection of candidature - Obligation to state reasons - Manifest error of assessment - Misuse of powers))

(2018/C 042/17)

Language of the case: Czech

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Oltis Group a.s. (Olomouc, Czech Republic) (represented by: P. Konečný, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Hottiaux and Z. Malůšková, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action based on Article 263 TFEU and seeking annulment of Commission Decision Ares (2015) 2691017 of 26 June 2015 concerning the request for a review of the rejection of the applicant’s application to become an associate member of the Shift2Rail Joint Undertaking.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Oltis Group a.s. to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Oltis Group a.s. to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 389, 23.11.2015.

1

---
Coating Operations at Aerospace Manufacturing

and Rework Operations Negative Declaration

ADMINISTRATIVE MATERIALS (per Appendix V, Section 2.1)

(a) Submittal letter from Governor/designee x

(b) Evidence of adoption x

(c) State/District legal authority to adopt x

(dl) Copy of actual rule/plan X

(d2) Rule changes indicated by underline/cross-out N/A(e) Proof that action met procedural requirements x

(f) Copy of public notice x

(g) Certification that hearing fulfilled public notice x(h) Public comments & agency response N/A

TECHNICAL SUPPORT (per Appendix V, Section 2.2)

(a) Regulated pollutants identified N/A

(b) Affected sources & attainment status identified N/A

(c) Rule/plan emissions impact N/A

(d) Attainment, PSD & other required demonstration N/A

(e) Modeling support as appropriate N/A

(f) Reliance on continuous emission reductions N/A

(g) Evidence of limits & other needed requirements N/A

(i) Justification for deviation from EPA policy N/A

OVERALL COMPLETENESS C

Notes:
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 77 (Monday, April 23, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 20139]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-7613]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-61,276]


ABN Amro, Chicago, IL; Notice of Termination of Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated on April 10, 2007 in response to a worker 
petition filed by a State agency on behalf of workers at ABN Amro, 
Chicago, Illinois.
    The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 13th day of April, 2007.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E7-7613 Filed 4-20-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P