alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(V.D. 110)

#### Compass Instrument & Optical Co. *v.*United States

Entry No. 736393, etc.

(Decided March 16, 1960)

*Siegel, Mandell £ Davidson*for.the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Chief Judge:

This matter is before me on remand from classification proceedings decided by the first division of this court in *Compass Instrument & Optical Co.*v. *United States, 42*Cust. Ct. 305, Abstract 62840, and it has been submitted for decision on a written stipulation, reading as follows:

IT I-S STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the plaintiff and the Assistant Attorney General for the United States, subject to the approval of the Court, relative to the merchandise covered by the remand of the Court under *Compass Instrument & Optical Co.*v. *United States*reported in Abstract 62840, decided March 12th, 1959:

> 1. That the merchandise consists of binoculars and cases which were held by the Court in Abstract 62840 to be subject to appraisement separately according to the value of each article.

> *5262. That the market value or price of the instruments and cases herein at the time of exportation of such merchandise at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal market of the country from which exported in the usual wholesale quantity and in the ordinary course of trade for export to the United States including cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition packed ready for shipment to the United States was as set forth in the schedule attached hereto and made a part hereof.

> 3. That on or about the date of exportation there was no higher foreign value for said binoculars and cases.

On the agreed facts, I hold that the proper basis for appraisement of the merchandise in question is export value, as defined hi section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, and that such statutory value therefor is as set forth in schedule “A,” hereto attached and made a part hereof.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-2607 ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ON ) BEHALF OF THE INTERNAL ) REVENUE SERVICE, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed March 21, 2018. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Karl Grube, Judge. Adam M. Topel of Liebler Gonzalez & Portuondo, Miami, for Appellant. W. Stephen Muldrow, United States Attorney, Holly L. Gershow, Assistant United States Attorney, and Michelle Thresher Taylor, Assistant United States Attorney, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

KELLY, LUCAS, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
# C_2016392EN.01003901.xml

| 24.10.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 392/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.10.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 392/39

---

Judgment of the General Court of 15 September 2016 — Trinity Haircare v EUIPO — Advance Magazine Publishers (VOGUE)

(Case T-453/15) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU figurative trade mark VOGUE - Absolute ground for refusal - No descriptive character - Distinctiveness - Article 52(1)(a), read in conjunction with Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Bad faith - Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009))

(2016/C 392/50)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Trinity Haircare AG (Herisau, Switzerland) (represented by: J. Kroher and K. Bach, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Lewis and J. Crespo Carrillo, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervening before the General Court: Advance Magazine Publishers, Inc. (New York, New York, United States) (represented by: D. Ivison, Barrister)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervening before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 27 May 2015 (Case R 2426/2014-4) relating to invalidity proceedings between Advance Magazine Publishers and Trinity Haircare.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Trinity Haircare AG to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) and by Advance Magazine Publishers, Inc. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Trinity Haircare AG to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) and by Advance Magazine Publishers, Inc.

---

(1)  OJ C 320, 28.9.2015.

1

---
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v RUDY LUCERO MARRUFO, Ship-serviceman Third Class, U. S. Navy, Appellant

7 USCMA 668, 23 CMR 132

No. 9642

Decided March 22, 1957

*Commander Earl C. Collins*was on the brief for Appellant, Accused.

*Commander Guilbert W. Martin*was on the brief for Appellee, United States.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

The accused was tried by a special court-martial for larceny (Charge I) and conspiracy to commit larceny (Charge II), in violation of Articles 121 and 81 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC §§ 921 and 881, respectively. He was acquitted of the former, but found guilty of the latter. The court adjudged a sentence which includes a bad-conduct discharge. Intermediate appellate authorities affirmed. We granted review to consider the accused’s contention that the president of the court failed to instruct properly on the elements of the offense of conspiracy.

As noted, the accused was charged with conspiracy to commit larceny. In his instructions the president advised the court members that to convict the accused they must find that he entered into an agreement with two other named persons, and that the object of the agreement was “to commit *conspiracy,*an offense under the Uniform Code of Military Justice.” (Emphasis supplied.) Plainly the instruction was erroneous and prejudicial. It permitted the court members to base a finding of guilty upon a matter not charged. United States v Rhoden, 1 USCMA 193, 2 CMR 99; United States v Williams, 1 USCMA 186, 2 CMR 92.

The decision of the board of review is reversed. The findings of guilty and the sentence are set aside. A rehearing may be ordered.
# C_2015294EN.01002601.xml

| 7.9.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 294/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.9.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 294/26

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van Cassatie (Belgium) lodged on 8 June 2015 — Rijksdienst voor Pensioenen v Willem Hoogstad; other party: Rijksinstituut voor ziekte- en invaliditeitsverzekering

(Case C-269/15)

(2015/C 294/32)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Referring court

Hof van Cassatie

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Rijksdienst voor Pensioenen

Appellant:

Respondent: Willem Hoogstad

Respondent:

Other party: Rijksinstituut voor ziekte- en invaliditeitsverzekering

Other party:

Question referred

Question referred

Must Article 13(1) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 (1) of 14 June 1971 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons, to self-employed persons and to members of their families moving within the Community be interpreted as precluding the levying of a contribution — such as the deduction made pursuant to Article 191(1)(7) of the Wet betreffende de verplichte verzekering voor geneeskundige verzorging en uitkeringen, gecoördineerd op 14 juli 1994 (Coordinated Law of 14 July 1994 on compulsory insurance for medical care and benefits) and the solidarity contribution payable pursuant to Article 68 of the Wet van 30 maart 1994 houdende sociale bepalingen (Law of 30 March 1994 concerning welfare provisions) — on benefits derived from Belgian supplementary pension schemes which are not legislation within the meaning of the first subparagraph of Article 1(j) of that regulation, in cases where those benefits are owed to an entitled recipient who does not reside in Belgium and who, in accordance with Article 13(2)(f) of that regulation, is subject to the social security legislation of the Member State in which he resides?

1

---

(1)  OJ, English Special Edition 1971(II), p. 416.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         939,382
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                      14,104,151
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               752,700
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                13,351
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  4,210,810
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         578,813
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           584,660
<LOANS>                                     15,950,911
<ALLOWANCE>                                    246,017
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              26,161,173
<DEPOSITS>                                  17,870,181
<SHORT-TERM>                                 4,639,407
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            498,281
<LONG-TERM>                                    947,704
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       561,099
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,644,501
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              26,161,173
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                661,392
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              148,557
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                61,325
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               871,274
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             258,791
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             410,880
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          460,394
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   44,907
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               5,155
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                372,666
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                267,994
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     172,301
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   172,301
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.54<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.52<F2>
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.13
<LOANS-NON>                                     59,329
<LOANS-PAST>                                    51,811
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                 81,000
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               281,394
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   58,766
<RECOVERIES>                                    11,925
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              246,017
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
<FN>
<F1>Basic EPS per Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 128
<F2>Diluted EPS per Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 128
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
# C_2016111EN.01004402.xml

| 29.3.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 111/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.3.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 111/44

---

Action brought on 28 December 2015 — ZZ and Others v EEAS

(Case F-153/15)

(2016/C 111/55)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicants: ZZ and Others (represented by: N. de Montigny and J.-N. Louis, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: European External Action Service (EEAS)

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision of the EEAS, in the applicants’ salary slips, in so far as it constitutes the first application of the reduction from 25 % to 20 % of the allowance for living conditions, applying a decision of the Chief Operating Officer.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Declare the decision of 23 February 2015 of the Chief Operating Officer of the EEAS inapplicable to the applicants; |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare the decision of 23 February 2015 of the Chief Operating Officer of the EEAS inapplicable to the applicants;

| — | Consequently, annul their salary slips for March 2015 and those issued subsequently, in so far as they apply an ALC of 20 %; |
| --- | --- |

—

Consequently, annul their salary slips for March 2015 and those issued subsequently, in so far as they apply an ALC of 20 %;

| — | Order the EEAS to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the EEAS to pay the costs.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
     10Q for the quarter ended December 31, 1997 and is qualified in its 
     entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  6-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Jun-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   Dec-31-1997
<CASH>                                           155,000
<SECURITIES>                                           0 
<RECEIVABLES>                                  2,785,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                      63,000
<INVENTORY>                                    8,170,000<F1>
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              11,413,000
<PP&E>                                        18,115,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                11,248,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                18,280,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          4,707,000
<BONDS>                                                0                                     
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0                         
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                       3,650,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     5,911,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  18,280,000
<SALES>                                       13,689,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              13,914,000
<CGS>                                         11,457,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 11,457,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               124,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1,047,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                     370,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              717,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                     717,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        .44
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        .43
<FN>
<F1>Net of LIFO reserve of $2,179,660
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
### Recharge studies on the High Plains in northern Lea County, New Mexico

By: John S. Havens

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1819F

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 4**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  November 4, 2009 | /s/ CHRISTOPHER J. EPERJESY                                           |
|-----------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                              | Christopher J. Eperjesy                                               |
|                              | Vice President – Finance, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |

----
No. 40379.

#### Petition 5699-R of Ashworth Bros., Inc. (Boston).

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

It appeared that the petitioner acted upon information received from the manufacturers of the chains abroad and that the entry was made without any intention to defraud the revenue. Being satisfied that the entry was made in good faith the court granted the petition.
No. 55493.

#### Hugo Neu Corp. *v.*United States,

protest 169218-K (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

The protest was dismissed.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 375 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 375

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                July 10 (legislative day, July 9), 2008

   Received and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and 
                             Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
To honor the goal of the International Year of Astronomy, and for other 
                               purposes.

Whereas the year 2009 represents the 400th Anniversary of Galileo's astronomical 
        use of the telescope;
Whereas the year 2009 has been designated the International Year of Astronomy 
        (IYA) by the United Nations and UNESCO;
Whereas astronomical observations and discoveries have profound implications for 
        the development of

              

 science, philosophy, culture, and our general conception of our place in 
the Universe;

Whereas astronomy is one of the oldest basic sciences and contributes 
        fundamentally to the ultimate context of all other sciences;
Whereas astronomy and astronomical discoveries continue to capture the 
        imagination of the American people;
Whereas the United States is the home of the most advanced astronomical research 
        in the world;
Whereas the many creative programs and activities planned in the United States 
        for IYA 2009 are strongly supported by the staff, missions, and 
        observatories of the National Science Foundation and the National 
        Aeronautics and Space Administration;
Whereas science and technology awareness and education play a critical role in 
        the economic success of the United States; and
Whereas the astronomical sciences inspire students to study science, 
        mathematics, engineering, and technology: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That the Congress--
            (1) honors the goal of the International Year of Astronomy 
        to celebrate astronomical discoveries;
            (2) encourages the public to participate in IYA 
        celebrations and activities and discover more about the 
        Universe and the science of astronomy; and
            (3) applauds the efforts of the employees, centers, and 
        laboratories of the National Aeronautics and Space 
        Administration and the National Science Foundation in promoting 
        public understanding of the astronomical sciences during the 
        celebration of the International Year of Astronomy.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 9, 2008.

            Attest:

                                            LORRAINE C. MILLER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
EXHIBIT 10.25

Agreement (to Provide Materials and Services)

---

This
AGREEMENT, entered into as of February 6, 2001 between Union Carbide Corporation ("UCC") and Dow Hydrocarbons and Resources Inc. ("DHRI"), under which DHRI agrees to provide UCC
with feedstocks, monomers, fuels, logistics and other services as follows, is amended and restated as of July 1, 2003 ("Restatement Date"):







23

---







24

---











25

---















DHRI



UCCDow Hydrocarbons and Resources Inc.
Houston Dow Center
400 Sam Houston Parkway South
Houston, Texas 77253
Attn: Executive Vice President



Union Carbide Corporation
39 Old Ridgebury Rd.
Danbury, CT 06817-0001
Attn: Treasurer


26

---



UCC:

UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION

DHRI:

DOW HYDROCARBONS AND RESOURCES INC.By:

/s/ E. W. Rich

By:

/s/ C. E. GannTitle:

CFO, VP, Treasurer

Title:

Executive Vice President


27

---

EXHIBIT A

DHRI shall make the following products available to UCC:

B-P Mix

Hydrocarbon ResidualBenzene

Mixed ButanesButadiene

N-butaneCoal

NaphthaCondensate

Natural GasCrude Butadiene

PropaneCumene

PropyleneE-P Mix

Pyrolsis GasolineEthane

StyreneEthylene

TolueneFuel Oil

UtilitiesOther miscellaneous feedstocks, fuels & monomers


All
feedstocks, fuels and monomers purchased will be in accordance with either the then current DHRI product specification or by mutual agreement.

28

---

QuickLinks