CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD



### APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM -- Page 1

(Electronic Format)

I. GENERAL INFORMATION

District: Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District

Rule No(s): 448 Date adopted/Amended/Rescinded: Amended February 26, 2009

Rule Title(s): Gasoline Transfer into Stationary Storage Containers

Date Submitted to ARB: December 17, 2010

If an Amended Rule, Date Last Amended (or Adopted): Amended February 2, 1995

Is the Rule Intended to be Sent to the U.S. EPA as a SIP Revision? Yes No ( If No, do not complete remainder of form)

District Contact: Kevin J. Williams Phone Number: (916) 874-4851 E-mail Address: kjwilliams@airquality.org

Narrative Summary of New Rule or Rule Changes: New Rule Amended Rule

Amendments to the rule: 1) Expand the applicability to in clude tanks of 250 gallons or more, mobile fueler

containers of 120 gallons or more, and "switch loading" of diesel fuel into a tank that previously contained

gasoline. 2) Divide the vapor recovery requirements in to separate sections more specific to underground tanks,

aboveground tanks, mobile fuelers, and gasoline delivery ve ssels. 3) Require vapor recovery during "pump out"

of stationary tanks and mobile fuelers. 4) Require an in spection of the Phase I vapor recovery system after each

fuel delivery. 5) Require that installation and repai r of Phase I systems be perfo rmed only by ICC-certified

technicians. 6) Require performance testing on Phas e I vapor recovery systems. The amendments are

consistent with CARB EVR regulati ons, improve the maintenance of vapor recovery systems and improve the

enforceability of existing provisions. No emission reductions are claimed.

Pollutant(s) Regulated by the Rule (Check): ROG (NOx) SO2

(CO) PM TAC (name):

II. EFFECT ON EMISSIONS

Complete this section ONLY for rules that, when implemented, w ill result in quantifiable changes in emissions. Attach referenc e(s) for emission factor(s)

and other information. Attach calculation sheet showi ng how the emission information provided below was determined

.

Net Effect on Emissions: Increase Decrease N/A

Emission Reduction Commitment in SIP for this Source Category: None

Inventory Year Used to Calculate Changes in Emissions : 2008 Area Affected: Sacramento County

Future Year Control Profile Estimate (Provide information on as many years as possible) :

N/ACALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD



### APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM -- Page 2

(Electronic Format)

Baseline Inventory in the SIP for the Control Measure: N/A

Emissions Reduction Commitment in the SIP for the Control Measure: N/A

Revised Baseline Inventory (if any): N/A

Revised Emission Reduction Estimate (if developed): N/A

Note that the district’s input to the Rule Evaluation Form will not be used as input to the ARB’s emission forecasting and

planning.

III. SOURCES/ATTAINMENT STATUS

District is: Attainment Nonattainment Split

Approximate Total Number of Small (<100 T PY) Sources Affected by this Amendment: 530

Percent in Nonattainment Area: 100%

Number of Large (> 100 TPY) Sources Controlled: 0 Percent in Nonattainment Area: 100%

Name(s) and Location(s) (city and county) of Large (> 100 TPY) Sources Controlled by Rule (Attach additional sheets as

necessary) : N/A

IV. EMISSION REDUCTION TECHNOLOGY

Does the Rule Include Emission Limits that are Continuous? Yes No

If Yes, Those Limits are in Section(s) 301 of the Rule.

Other Methods in the Rule for Achi eving Emission Reductions are:

V. OTHER REQUIREMENTS

The Rule Contains:

Emission Limits in Section(s): 301 Work Practice Standards in Section(s): 305 and 306

Recordkeeping Requirements in Section(s): 502 Reporting Requirements in Section(s): N/ACALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD



### APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM -- Page 3

(Electronic Format)

5/1/2002 3

VI. IMPACT ON AIR QUALITY PLAN

No Impact Impacts RFP Impacts attainment

Discussion: This rule amendment may result in a small but unquantifiable reduction in em issions by improving the

maintenance of vapor recovery systems and improving the enforceability of existi ng provisions. No emission reductions

have been claimed.