alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 366 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 5, 2008 

Received and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and 

Pensions 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of Congress that increasing American 

capabilities in science, mathematics, and technology education should be a national priority. 

Whereas the economic competitiveness of the Nation depends 

on strong science, mathematics, and technology capabilities throughout the workforce; 

Whereas the need for improvement in education is acute in 

the areas of science, mathematics, and technology; 

Whereas our national competitiveness strategy must include 

the goals of— 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

HCON 366 RFS 

(1) ensuring that all young persons achieve a level 

of technological literacy adequate to prepare them for the 

demands of a scientific and technologically oriented society; and 

(2) fulfilling the need for a deep pool of talented 

American leaders in science and technological research 

and development; 

Whereas numerous research reports indicate the Nation is 

not achieving these goals; 

Whereas the most recent United States National Assessment 

of Educational Progress reveals that a majority of those 

17 years of age are poorly equipped for informed citizenship and productive performance in the workplace; 

Whereas by 2016, 35.4 percent of our workforce will be comprised of minority workers, and 46.6 percent will be 

women; and 

Whereas women and minorities continue to be underserved by 

and underrepresented in science and mathematics: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that— 

3 (1) this Nation should dedicate its resources to 

4 the development of a broad pool of citizens who are 

5 functionally literate in science, mathematics, and 

6 technology; 

7 (2) a national science education policy in the 

8 coming decade should address the crucial need areas 

9 of— 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
3 

HCON 366 RFS 

1 (A) substantially increasing science schol2 arships and providing adequate financial re3 sources to permit students from underrep4 resented populations to study science, mathe5 matics, and technology; and 

6 (B) actively involving National Science 

7 Foundation involvement in curriculum develop8 ment with strong emphasis on reinforcing 

9 science and mathematics concepts at each grade 

10 level; and 

11 (3) this national challenge can be met through 

12 strong leadership from the White House Office of 

13 Science and Technology Policy; other Federal, State, 

14 and local governments; and with long-term commit15 ments from the civic, business, and engineering com16 munities. 

Passed the House of Representatives June 4, 2008. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-10720

Summary Calendar 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee 

v. 

ARNULFO DAVILA, 

Defendant-Appellant 

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Northern District of Texas 

USDC No. 3:04-CR-194-1 

Before JONES, WIENER, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Arnulfo Davila, federal prisoner # 32490-177, appeals the district court’s

denial of his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion. He contends that the district court 

erred in failing to consider the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors before denying his 

motion and in failing to consider the applicable guidelines range. 

 The district court sentenced Davila to 300 months of imprisonment 

based on his binding agreement under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 6, 2017

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 16-10720 Document: 00514021994 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/06/2017
No. 16-10720

2 

11(c)(1)(C). Davila’s plea agreement did not call for him to be sentenced within 

a particular guidelines range, nor did it indicate that the basis for the specified 

term was a guidelines range applicable to his offense. See Freeman v. United 

States, 564 U.S. 522, 534-40 (2011) (Sotomayor, J., concurring); United States 

v. Benitez, 822 F.3d 807, 809-12 (5th Cir. 2016). Additionally, the plea 

agreement did not explicitly employ a particular guidelines range to establish 

the term of imprisonment. See Benitez, 822 F.3d at 811. Thus, Davila was not 

eligible for a reduction because his sentence was not “based on a sentencing 

range that has subsequently been lowered by the Sentencing Commission.” 

§ 3582(c)(2); see Benitez, 822 F.3d at 811-12. The district court’s denial of a 

sentence reduction is, therefore, AFFIRMED. See Benitez, 822 F.3d at 809-12; 

Dillon v. United States, 560 U.S. 817, 826-27 (2010).

 Case: 16-10720 Document: 00514021994 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/06/2017
Exhibit 32

Certification Pursuant to Section 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

          Pursuant  to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsection
     (a)  and  (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code),
     each  of  the  undersigned  officers  of  Canal  Capital  Corporation  and
     Subsidiaries,  a  Delaware corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify
     that:

     The  Quarterly  Report  of  Form  10-Q  for  the  six months ended July 31,
     2009  (the "Form 10-Q") of the Company fully complies with the requirements
     of  section  13(a)  or  15(d)  of  the  Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
     information  contained  in  the  Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: September 14, 2009               /S/ Michael E. Schultz
                                       ----------------------
                                       Chief Executive Officer

Date: September 14, 2009               /S/ Reginald Schauder
                                       ---------------------
                                       Chief Financial Officer
..... 

.. ·.• ,.:. 

'. ' ~·. . 

Essential Air Service at 

'"· ,: ' .. 

BEFORE THE 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

WASHINGTON, D~C. 

) 

) 

) 

. ~. : , 

1\tlERIDIAN, l\tliSSISSIPPI ) OST-2008-0112 

........ .. ·) 

Under 49 U.S.C. §41731 et seq. ) 

SILVER AIRWAYS PROPOSAL TO PROVIDE SUBSIDIZED AIR SERVICE 

AT.MERIDIAN, MISSISSIPPI- SUPPLEMENTAL INFORlVIATION 

Correspondence with regard to this document should be addressed to: 

Mickey Bowman 

Vice President Essential Air Service 

Silver Airways 

II 00 Lee Wagener Blvd, Suite 20 I 

Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33315 

Telephone: 954-302-5929 

Fax: 270-689-2180 

E-Mail: mbowman@gosilver.com 

. .,. ~· 

In response to concerns raised by the community of Meridian, MS relating to Silver Airways proposal to provide 

Essential Air Service; Silver Airways offers the following alternate service pattern.· Studying the travel patterns of 

the communit-y and best liSe of Silver Airways resources, this alternative service pattern w.ould seem the best 

compromise. It should be understood that this is a draft schedule and may not be representative of the final 

published schedule. . · 

S~HEDULE 

3MIAD812 MARKET PAGE. 

(LOCAL) SUMMARY I 

I 0/0 1/12 - 99/99/99 

FROM TO DEP ARR FLT EQP FREQ STP 

STA STA Tll\IIE TIME NUM 

rvmi ATL 600 825 3610 SF3 X7 0 

MEl ATL 900 1125 3614 SF3 7 Only 0 

MEI ATL 1330 1555 3611 SF3 X6 0 

ATL MEl 1230 1305 3611 SF3 X6 () 

ATL MEl 1715 1750 3614 SF3 60nly () 

ATL MEl 2100 2135 3612 SF.3 X6 0
EXHIBIT 32

| 1.   | The      Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 26,      2008, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32 (the “Periodic      Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,  and |
|----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The      information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of      the Company. |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                         |   |                           |   |
|------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------|--------|
| Dated:      November 5, 2008 | By:    | /s/ Martin      M. Koffel |   |
|                         |   | Martin      M. Koffel          |   |
|                         |   | Chief      Executive Officer   |   |
|                         |   |                           |   |

| Dated:      November 5, 2008 | By:    | /s/ H.      Thomas Hicks |   |
|------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------|--------|
|                         |   | H.      Thomas Hicks          |   |
|                         |   | Chief      Financial Officer  |   |
|                         |   |                          |   |

----
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. No. 97-7273

JAMES M. HALL, JR.,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond.

James R. Spencer, District Judge.

(CR-90-9, CA-97-309-3)

Submitted: July 31, 1998

Decided: September 16, 1998

Before MURNAGHAN and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and

HALL, Senior Circuit Judge.

_________________________________________________________________

Vacated and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

_________________________________________________________________

COUNSEL

James M. Hall, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Wiley Miller, OFFICE

OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for

Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See

Local Rule 36(c).
OPINION

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief

on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp.

1998). Appellant's conviction became final on December 2, 1991. On

April 29, 1997, Appellant filed a § 2255 motion. The district court

denied relief because Appellant filed his motion outside the one-year

limitation period imposed by § 2255. Pursuant to our recent decision

in Brown v. Angelone, ___ F.3d #6D6D 6D#, Nos. 96-7173, 96-7208, 1998

WL 389030 (4th Cir. July 14, 1998), Appellant had until April 23,

1997, in which to file a timely motion. Because Appellant signed his

§ 2255 motion on April 23, 1997, he may have given it to prison officials by that date. Accordingly, we remand for the district court to

determine when Appellant delivered his § 2255 motion to prison officials for mailing under Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266 (1988). If the

court determines that the § 2255 motion was filed under Houston

before April 24, 1997, then we instruct the court to consider the

§ 2255 motion on the merits under Brown v. Angelone. Accordingly,

we grant a certificate of appealability, vacate the district court's order,

and remand this case for consideration consistent with this opinion.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

VACATED AND REMANDED

 2
110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 230 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Whereas every 3 minutes a woman is diagnosed with breast 

cancer; 

Whereas another 180,510 new cases of breast cancer are expected to be diagnosed in the United States in 2007; 

Whereas breast cancer is the leading cause of death among 

women between the ages of 45 and 54; 
2 

•HCON 230 EH 

Whereas 1 out of every 8 women who live to the age of 85 

will develop breast cancer in her lifetime; 

Whereas the survival rate of women who have breast cancer 

is 98.1 percent when detected in the early stages; 

Whereas mammograms and monthly breast self-examinations 

are the key components of early detection; and 

Whereas observing a Breast Cancer Awareness Month would 

provide a special opportunity to offer education on the 

importance of monthly breast self-examinations and annual mammograms: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That Congress— 

3 (1) supports the observance of Breast Cancer 

4 Awareness Month in order to provide a special op5 portunity to offer education on the importance of 

6 monthly breast self-examinations and annual mam7 mograms; 

8 (2) salutes the more than 2.4 million breast 

9 cancer survivors in the United States and the efforts 

10 of victims, volunteers, and professionals who combat 

11 breast cancer each day; 

12 (3) recognizes and applauds the national and 

13 community organizations for their work in pro14 moting awareness about breast cancer, providing in15 formation, and offering treatment to its sufferers; 

16 and 
3 

•HCON 230 EH 

1 (4) urges organizations and health practitioners 

2 to use this opportunity to promote awareness about 

3 breast cancer, to support monthly self-examinations, 

4 and to encourage annual mammograms. 

Passed the House of Representatives October 29, 

2007. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 230 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Supporting the observance of Breast Cancer 

Awareness Month, and for other purposes.
United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

No. 03-1586

COADY CORP., d/b/a 495 TOYOTA,

Plaintiff, Appellant,

v.

TOYOTA MOTOR DISTRIBUTORS, INC.,

Defendant, Appellee.

ERRATA

The opinion of this court issued March 18, 2004, is amended as

follows:

Page 4, paragraph 2, last sentence: replace "note 3" with

"note 4".

Page 13, note 5, line 5, add the word "the" after the words

"such as".

Page 16, paragraph 2, line 5, replace "note 4" with "note 5".
<PAGE>   1


                                                                     Exhibit 4.2



                           NOVEMBER 1999 AMENDMENT TO
                              HEALTHGATE DATA CORP.
                             1994 STOCK OPTION PLAN

     THIS NOVEMBER 1999 AMENDMENT TO HEALTHGATE DATA CORP. 1994 STOCK OPTION
PLAN shall be effective as of November 19, 1999.

     WHEREAS, HealthGate Data Corp. (the "Company") maintains the HealthGate
Data Corp. 1994 Stock Option Plan (the "1994 Plan");

     WHEREAS, by previous amendments to the Plan, the number of shares of the
Company's Common Stock which may be issued and sold by the Company pursuant to
Stock Options under the 1994 Plan was increased to 650,000 shares;

     WHEREAS, by resolution approved by the Board of Directors of the Company on
November 18, 1999, and by vote of the stockholders of the Company on November
19, 1999, the number of shares that may be sold pursuant to Stock Options under
the Plan was increased from 650,000 (pre-split) shares to 907,715 (pre-split)
shares, which following the Company's anticipated 3.966 for 1 stock split will
equal 3,599,997 post-split shares;

     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing premises, the 1994 Plan
is hereby amended as follows:

     1.   NUMBER OF SHARES. The number of shares of the Company's Common Stock
that may be sold pursuant to Stock Options granted under the 1994 Plan shall be
increased from 650,000 (pre-split) shares to 907,715 (pre-split), which
following the Company's anticipated 3.966 for 1 stock split will equal 3,599,997
post-split shares.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this November 1999
Amendment to be effective as of the date first above written.


                                        HEALTHGATE DATA CORP.



                                        By: /s/ William S. Reece
                                            -----------------------------------
                                            William S. Reece
                                            Chairman & Chief Executive Officer



                                       9
No. 46969.

#### Protest 999855-G of Erie Wedemeyer (New York).

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise in question is of the same character as that passed upon in *Wedemeyer*v. *United States*(7 Cust. Ct. 141, C. D. 556). In accordance therewith the bicycle lamps with electric generators were held dutiable at 30 percent under paragraph 371 as parts of bicycles, as claimed.
# C_2015096EN.01002502.xml

| 23.3.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 96/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.3.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 96/25

---

Action brought on 9 January 2015 — ZZ and ZZ v Commission

(Case F-3/15)

(2015/C 096/32)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicants: ZZ and ZZ (represented by: J.-N. Louis and N. de Montigny, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

The annulment of the Commission’s decisions rejecting the applicants’ requests for repayment of a portion of the contributions to the European Union pension scheme which were deducted from their pay and the request to reassess the credit relating to the transfer of pension rights, acquired before their entry into service, to the EU scheme.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Declare inapplicable Article 22 of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations in the version in force since 1 November 2014; |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare inapplicable Article 22 of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations in the version in force since 1 November 2014;

| — | annul the contested decisions; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decisions;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

---
v. THE STATE OF TEXAS NO. § § § § § IN THE COURT OF 

## CRIMINAL APPEALRECEIVED IU COURTOF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS 

### JUN26 2015 Pro Se Motion for Extension ofTime „, . . „, 

### r„ r ti TM ti Abe Acosta, C ep To File Petition for Discretionary Review TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS: 

### COMES NOWthe Appellant/Petitioner inthe above-styled and numbered cause andp.. Cn 

## respectfully moves this Honorable Courtto extend the time for filing the Appellant's Petitionfor'^'NALAPPALS jjjw or opt 

### Discretionary Review inthis cause and insupport thereofwould show to the Court the ^J'3 

## following: AbelAcosta, Clerk 

## 1. The style and number ofthis case in the Court ofAppeals, is: Joj^p ^Q-Cr^ ^ 0[-JLi-OOofi> -CA. 

# TheState ofTexas, Appeal No. A f- li '000jl -CR. 2. The style and number ofthe case in the trial court is: The State ofTexas v. 

## J°kA (jura, ;Cause N^^'^Qi^'; from the *H DistrictCourtof Dallas County, Texas. * , ±. 

### 3. The Appellant was convicted ofthe felony offense of j frc*u/^</c~*tC*~ r 4. Judgment was entered on and punishment was assessed at _^a 

## years confinement and afine in the amount of Jj I^QOO' Vo . 5. The conviction was affirmed in the Court ofAppeals on Jvn^- m j " .

PRO SE MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
- Page 16. The deadline for filing the Appellant's Petition for Discretionary Review in this 

## V -> 7. An extension oftime for a period ofsixty (60) days is requested that would make 

# theduedate J?Ao./nUr j^j Aotf • 8. No prior request for an extension oftime has been made. 9. The facts relied upon to show good cause for the requested extension are, as follows: The Appellant/Petitioner was represented by court appointed counsel during the appeal ofthis case to the Court ofAppeals. After the conviction was affirmed, the trial court refused to appoint counsel to file a Petition for Discretionary Review. Therefore, additional time is needed for the Appellant/Petitioner to either prepare and file the Petition pro se or to seek legal assistance in filing the Petition. WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, the Appellant /Petitioner respectfully requests that this Honorable Court extend time for filing the Petition for Discretionary Review in 

# this cause to J^aTj.^^ ft j^e/f . Respectfully submitted, cause is



## rS&JU&yyjnJfr> [Name

PRO SE MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW - Page 2CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The Appellant/Petitioner hereby certifies that a true and correct copy ofthe foregoing 

## Motion has been mailed to the Office ofthe Criminal DistrictAttorney for (o /'(/> County,
, and mailed via U.S. mail, to the Office ofthe State Prosecuting Attorney,



# ,onthe £) day of 3<"<- ,20 //.
[Name]l»J^ 

# 7oSif>^ iuarr** -ft/fcy \^\

PRO SE MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW - Page 3
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 14 (Tuesday, January 23, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 2866]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-848]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration


Oceanic and Atmospheric Research; National Sea Grant Review Panel

AGENCY: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice sets forth the schedule and proposed agenda of a 
forthcoming meeting of the Sea Grant Review Panel. The meeting will 
have several purposes. Panel members will discuss and provide advice on 
the National Sea Grant College Program in the areas of program 
evaluation, strategic planning, education and extension, science and 
technology programs, and other matters as described below.

DATES: The announced meeting is scheduled for: February 21-22, 2007.

ADDRESSES: Headquarters of the Consortium for Oceanographic Research & 
Education (CORE), 1201 New York Avenue, NW., 4th Floor Conference Room, 
Washington, DC 20005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Joseph Brown, National Sea Grant 
College Program, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, 1315 
East-West Highway, Room 11717, Silver Spring, Maryland 20910, (301) 
734-1088.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Panel, which consists of a balanced 
representation from academia, industry, state government and citizens 
groups, was established in 1976 by Section 209 of the Sea Grant 
Improvement Act (Pub. L. 94-461, 33 U.S.C. 1128). The Panel advises the 
Secretary of Commerce and the Director of the National Sea Grant 
College Program with respect to operations under the Act, and such 
other matters as the Secretary refers to them for review and advice.
    A link to the agenda for the meeting can be found on the web at 
http://www.seagrant.noaa.gov/leadership/review_panel.html.
    If you do not have access to the internet, please contact Joe Brown 
at the address above for a hard copy.
    This meeting will be open to the public.

    Dated: January 16, 2007.
Mark E. Brown,
Chief Financial Officer, Oceanic and Atmospheric Research, National 
Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
 [FR Doc. E7-848 Filed 1-22-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-KA-P
No. 46963.

#### Protests 990384-G, etc., of B. R. Anderson & Co. (Seattle).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of *Atlas Marine Supply Co.*v. *United States*(29 C. C. P. A. 20, C. A. D. 165) the drums or tanks in question were held entitled to free entry as claimed.