alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## IN THE COURT O F CRIMINA L A PPEA LS OF TEXA S

N O S . W R - 8 1 , 8 0 6 - 0 3 & W R - 8 1 , 8 0 6 - 0 4

E X P A R T E J E E N A R O B E R T S , A p p l i c a n t

O N A P P L I C A T I O N S F O R W R I T S O F H A B E A S C O R P U S C A U S E N O S . 2 0 1 0 - 4 2 9 , 3 8 9 - B & 2 0 1 0 - 4 2 9 , 3 9 0 - B I N T H E 1 4 0 T H D I S T R I C T C O U R T F R O M L U B B O C K C O U N T Y

P e r c u r i a m . O P I N I O N P u rs u an t t o the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedur e, th e cler k of the trial court t ra n s m i t t ed t o this Court these applications for writs of habea s corpus. Ex parte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of intox ication assault and intox ication manslaughter and sentenc ed to eig ht year s’ imprisonment and fiftee n y ear s’ imprisonment, respec tively

. Applicant contends, amongother thi ng s, that she was deprive d her right to file an appea l. T h e trial court has signe d finding s of fac t stating that Applicant did not waive her rig ht to ap p ea l ruling s on pre- trial motions as part of the plea agree ment and, there fore , was denied her rig ht to file2

an appe al. The trial court has rec ommended that Applicant be g rante d relief. We find that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-time appea l of the judgme nts of convictions in Cause No. 2010-429,389 and Cause No. 2010-429,390 from the 140th J udicial District Court of Lubbock County

. Applicant is order ed re turned to that time a t which she may

g ive a written notice of a ppeal so that she m ay

then, with the aid of c ounsel, obtain a mea ningf ul appea l. All tim e limits shall be calc ulated as if the sentenc e had been imposed on the date on which the mandate of this Court issues. We hold that, should Applicant desire to prosec ute an appea l, she must take aff irmative steps to file

a wr itten notice of a

ppeal in the tria l court within 30 day s after the mandate of this Court issues. Appl i cant’ s rema ining claims are dismiss ed. See Ex parte Torres , 943 S.W .2d 469 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997).

Deliver ed: J une 10, 2015 Do Not Publish
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

          - [AAG/A Order No. 012-2007] 

                    Pursuant to the provisions of the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), the Department of Justice (DOJ) is removing the published notice of a Privacy Act system of records entitled “Master Index File of Names, DAG-005,” last published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on October 21, 1985, at 50 FR 42606.                 

The “Master Index File of Names” was a system for tracking individuals covered by the following systems of records: Appointed Assistant U.S. Attorneys Personnel System; Assistant U.S. Attorney Applicant Records; Presidential Appointee Candidate Records System; Presidential Appointee Records System; Special Candidates for Presidential Appointments Records System; and U.S. Judges Records System. The “Master Index File of Names” consisted of paper file cards containing individually identifiable information such as: date of birth; date of entry on duty in Federal Service; date of termination of Federal Service; and disposition of the records folder. 

The file cards designated as “Master Index File of Names, DAG-005” were destroyed in accordance with National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) guidelines. The underlying records from which the information on these cards was extracted are all covered by other systems of records notices. 

                    Therefore, the notice of “DAG-005, Master Index File of Names” is removed from the Department's listing of Privacy Act systems of records notices, effective on the date of publication of this notice in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                 

Dated: April 19, 2007. 

Lee J. Lofthus, 

Assistant Attorney General for Administration. 

[FR Doc. E7-8273 Filed 4-30-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410-CG-P
Idaho Soil Scientist Receives National Civil Rights Award

State Conservationist Richard Sims recently presented soil 

scientist Leah Juarros with the 2006 NRCS Workforce Diversity 

Award for non-managers. Chief Lancaster announced Juarros as 

a National Civil Awards recipient for her recruitment efforts with 

the University of Guam and Boise State University to diversify 

NRCS’ workforce. 

Juarros efforts brought Idaho NRCS its first Asian Pacific 

Islander SCEP employee in the summer of 2006. However, she considers it more of a 

team effort. “I couldn’t have done it by myself,” said Juarros. “I am indebted to my 

contacts at the University of Guam; Rich who gave me the time, and all those who 

pitched in. Although the award was given to me—it was for everybody.” 

In addition, Leah spearheaded ten outreach events with middle 

and high school students to promote agricultural careers with 

NRCS. “Leah is laying the groundwork for an increased 

awareness of Agency career opportunities and a significantly 

larger hiring pool of qualified diverse candidates in Idaho,” said 

Sims. 

Leah’s outreach efforts are seemingly endless. As the Asian 

American/Pacific Islander SEPM, Juarros most recent endeavor 

literally brought a taste of India to dozens of Idaho NRCS 

employees. Complete details are forthcoming. Be sure to check 

http://www.id.nrcs.usda.gov/news/ periodically for future 

eNewsbytes.
<PAGE>

Exhibit 99.1

                            UNIFAB INTERNATIONAL,INC.
                    ANNOUNCES MOVE TO NASDAQ SMALLCAP MARKET


NEW IBERIA, La. - (Business Wire) - June 10, 2002; UNIFAB International, Inc.
(NASDAQ: UFAB) today announced the transfer of its common stock listing to the
NASDAQ SmallCap Market. This change is effective at the opening of business on
Wednesday, June 12, 2002 with Unifab shares continuing to be traded under the
symbol "UFAB".

"With the increasingly stringent NASDAQ National Market listing requirements, we
believe Unifab is currently better suited to the structure and costs associated
with being listed on the NASDAQ SmallCap Market," commented Peter J. Roman,
Interim President and CEO. "We are focused on executing a plan of cost cutting
and internal reorganization in an effort to return the Company to profitability
and position the Company as a strong market competitor. Our trading symbol
remains the same and this transition does not affect the way in which our stock
is traded."

UNIFAB International, Inc. is an industry leader in the custom fabrication of
topside facilities, decks, jackets, equipment modules and other structures used
in the development and production of oil and gas reserves. In addition, the
Company designs and manufactures specialized process systems, refurbishes and
retrofits existing jackets and decks, provides design, repair, refurbishment and
conversion services for oil and gas drilling rigs and performs offshore piping
hook-up and platform maintenance services.

Statements made in this news release regarding Unifab's expectations as to
future operations of the Company and other statements included herein that are
not statements of historical fact are forward-looking statements that depend
upon the following factors, among others: Unifab's ability to meet the scheduled
reductions of the Company's senior secured debt, continued demand for the
services provided by Unifab, availability of skilled employees, and Unifab's
ability to integrate and manage acquired businesses. Should any of these factors
not continue as anticipated, actual results and plans could differ materially
from those expressed in the forward-looking statements.
# C_2016364EN.01003901.xml

| 3.10.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 364/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.10.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 364/39

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 20 July 2016 — HC v Commission

(Case F-132/15) (1)

((Civil service - Temporary staff - Succession of appointments under various status categories at several institutions of the European Union - Interruption by a period of unemployment - Continued membership of the of the Joint Sickness Insurance Scheme - New appointment - Article 13 of the CEOS - Medical examination prior to employment - Article 32 of the CEOS - Failure of the interested party to declare an illness already affecting her - Subsequent discovery by the AECC - Retroactive application of a five-year medical reservation - Challenge - Referral to the Invalidity Committee - Duty of loyalty - Decision of the AECC to bar the agent from being recruited by the institution for a period of six years))

(2016/C 364/47)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: HC (represented by: J.-N. Louis and N. de Montigny, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: C. Berardis-Kayser, T. S. Bohr and C. Ehrbar, agents)

Re:

Annulment of the Commission’s decision to apply the medical reservation clause in Article 32 of the CEOS, retroactively, with effect from the date of entry into service of the applicant with the Commission and to suspend the invalidity and death insurance and, in addition, annulment of the decision to bar the applicant from being recruited by the Commission for a period of six years to run from the date on which her last contract ended.

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of 29 January 2015 by which the authority empowered to conclude contracts of employment of the European Commission barred HC from being recruited by the institution for a period of six years; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of 29 January 2015 by which the authority empowered to conclude contracts of employment of the European Commission barred HC from being recruited by the institution for a period of six years;

| 2. | Dismisses the remainder of the application; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the remainder of the application;

| 3. | Orders the European Commission to pay its own costs and to bear half the costs incurred by HC; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the European Commission to pay its own costs and to bear half the costs incurred by HC;

| 4. | Orders HC to bear half of her own costs. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders HC to bear half of her own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 406, 7/12/2015, p. 46.

---
May 4, 1970

No. 70-20

#### Nolberto Vasquez, PVT, U. S. Marine Corps v United States.

On consideration of the “Petition by the Accused for Appropriate Extraordinary Relief before the United States Court of Military Appeals” and of the Respondent’s reply to the Order of this Court to show cause why the relief therein should not be granted, it appearing that subsequent to the issuance of said Order the Convening Authority completed his action upon the record of the accused’s trial and has forwarded said record for review by the United States Navy Court of Military Review, before which it was filed on April 27, 1970, it is, by the Court, this 4th day of May 1970,

ORDERED:

That said Petition be, and the same is, hereby dismissed as moot.
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v BOB L. (also known as ROBERT L.) HOLMES, Private E-1, U. S. Army, Appellant

8 USCMA 489, 24 CMR 299

No. 10,193

Decided December 13, 1957

*First Lieutenant Ed/ioin E. Allen*argued the cause for Appellant, Accused. With him on the brief was *Captain John F. Christensen.*

*First Lieutenant Jay D. Fischer*argued the cause for Appellee, United States. With him on the brief were *Lieutenant Colonel John G. Lee*and *Major Thomas J. Nichols.*

Opinion of the Court

Homer Ferguson, Judge:

The isSue presented has been decided in appellant’s favor by the case of United States v Soccio, 8 USCMA 477, 24 CMR 287. For the reasons stated in that opinion, the conyiction of desertion must be set aside. The decision of the board of review is reversed. The record of trial is returned to The Judge Advocate General of the Army for reference to a board of review. The board, in its discretion, may *490approve the .lesser offense of absence without leave and reassess the sentence, or it may order a rehearing on the principal charge.

Chief Judge Quinn concurs.

LatimeR, Judge

(dissenting):

I dissent for the reasons set forth in my separate opinion in United States v Soccio, 8 USCMA 477, 24 CMR 287.
No. 47602.

#### Protests 735220-G, etc., of M. Arachtingi et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 279 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 22 (legislative day, JANUARY 3), 2008 

Received 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Providing for a conditional adjournment of the House of 

Representatives. 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That when the House adjourns on the legisla3 tive day of Wednesday, January 23, 2008, on a motion 

4 offered pursuant to this concurrent resolution by its Ma5 jority Leader or his designee, it stand adjourned until 2 

6 p.m. on Monday, January 28, 2008, or until the time of 

7 any reassembly pursuant to section 2 of this 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

HCON 279 RDS 

1 concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first; and that 

2 when the House adjourns on the legislative day of Tues3 day, January 29, 2008, on a motion offered pursuant to 

4 this concurrent resolution by its Majority Leader or his 

5 designee, it stand adjourned until 2 p.m. on Wednesday, 

6 February 6, 2008, or until the time of any reassembly pur7 suant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever 

8 occurs first. 

9 SEC. 2. The Speaker or her designee, after consulta10 tion with the Minority Leader, shall notify the Members 

11 of the House to reassemble at such place and time as she 

12 may designate if, in her opinion, the public interest shall 

13 warrant it. 

Passed the House of Representatives January 16, 

2008. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
Certification Pursuant to Section 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 
 Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsection (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Canal Capital Corporation and Subsidiaries, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify that:
 
 The Quarterly Report of Form 10-Q for the three months ended January 31, 2011 (the “Form 10-Q”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 Date: March 14, 2011
/S/ Michael E. SchultzChief Executive OfficerDate: March 14, 2011
/S/ Reginald SchauderChief Financial Officer
## S IXTH 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ Case No. 6D2 3

- 943 Lower Tribunal No. 202 1

- CA

- 000747

_____________________________ R ICHARD M AGNUSSEN , Appellant ,

v. C ITY OF N APLES , Appellee

.

_____________________________ Appeal from the Circuit Court for Collier County

. Lauren L. Brodie , Judge. March 26, 2024
PER CURIAM

. AFFIRMED

. NARDELLA , BROWNLEE and GANNAM , JJ., c oncur.

Charles P. Brady , of Charles Brady Law, PLLC , Saint Petersburg , for Appellant.
Ralf Brookes and James Stokes , of the City Attorney’s Office , Naples , for Appellee.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED
```

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 224 (Monday, November 21, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 83236]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-27979]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[CERCLA-04-2017-3750; FRL-9955-46-Region 4]

Crowders Mountain Site, Kings Mountain, Gaston County, North 
Carolina; Notice of Settlement

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.

ACTION: Notice of settlement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under 122(h) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, 
Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA), the United States 
Environmental Protection Agency has entered into a settlement with 
North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources, concerning 
the Crowders Mountain Superfund Site located in Kings Mountain, Gaston 
County, North Carolina. The settlement addresses recovery of CERCLA 
costs for a cleanup action performed by the EPA at the Site.

DATES: The Agency will consider public comments on the settlement until 
December 21, 2016. The Agency will consider all comments received and 
may modify or withdraw its consent to the proposed settlement if 
comments received disclose facts or considerations which indicate that 
the proposed settlement is inappropriate, improper, or inadequate.

ADDRESSES: Copies of the settlement are available from the Agency by 
contacting Ms. Paula V. Painter, Program Analyst, using the contact 
information provided in this notice. Comments may also be submitted by 
referencing the Site's name through one of the following methods:
    Internet: https://www.epa.gov/aboutepa/about-epa-region-4-southeast#r4-public-notices.
     U.S. Mail: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Superfund 
Division, Attn: Paula V. Painter, 61 Forsyth Street SW., Atlanta, 
Georgia 30303.
     Email: Painter.Paula@epa.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paula V. Painter at 404/562-8887.

    Dated: October 26, 2016.
 Greg Armstrong,
Acting Chief, Enforcement and Community Engagement Branch, Superfund 
Division.
[FR Doc. 2016-27979 Filed 11-18-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
No. 46372.

#### Protest 59521-K of Somerset Importers, Ltd. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

At the trial the collector’s report, together with the oath of the importer on short shipment, was admitted in evidence. It appeared from the record that the collector failed to send the importer the notice of shortage as required by article 812, Customs Regulations of 1937. Consequently no affidavit of short shipment was filed and no allowance was made in liquidation for the missing packages. The collector reports that the timely affidavit has now been filed. In view of the record presented the protest was sustained and the collector directed to reliquidate the entry making allowance for the two packages,
#### W. X. Huber Co. *v.*United States

No. 6441.

Entry No. 5463.

Invoice dated Kobe, Japan, October 15, 1937.

Certified October 16, 1937.

Entered at Los Angeles, Calif., November 17, 1937.

(Decided October 15, 1946)

*Harper & Harper (George B. Tuttle*of counsel) for tlie plaintiff.

*Paul P. Bao,*Assistant Attorney General *(Joseph E. Weil,*special attorney), for tlie defendant.

EKWAll, Judge:

This is an appeal for reappraisement on certain cotton and rayon articles. At the hearing it was agreed that the *376merchandise is m all material respects such as or similar to the rayon in the articles the subject of decision in *United States*v. *Nippon Dry Goods Co.,*Reap. Dec. 5006, affirming Reap. Dec. 4704; that the issue herein and the conditions as to market value are the same as the issue and conditions as to market value in the cited case; and that the cited case might be incorporated herein.

It was further agreed that the appraised values of the cotton and rayon articles here involved, less any additions made by the importer by reason of the so-called Japanese consumption tax to meet advances by the appraiser in similar cases, represent the prices at the time of exportation of such merchandise to the United States' at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade for exportation to the United States, and that there was no higher foreign value at the time of exportation. The appeal was abandoned as to all merchandise other than rayon and cotton articles.

Upon this state of the record I find that the export value as defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, is the proper basis for the determination of the value of the rayon and cotton articles here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less any additions made by the importer by reason of the so-called Japanese consumption tax, to meet advances by the appraiser in similar cases. As to merchandise other than the rayon and cotton articles, the appeal having been abandoned, is dismissed.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
No. 39087.

#### Petition 5664-R of Amerlux Steel Corp. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

The petition was dismissed.
(Reap. Dec. 8853)

#### Barnett International Forwarders, Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 977719.

(Decided June 20, 1957)

*Siegel, Mandell & Davidson*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Mollison, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the parties hereto, subject to the approval of the Court, that at the time of exportation of the merchandise embraced in the entry covered by the Appeal to Reappraisement noted above, there was no foreign value, export value or United States value, as defined in Section 402 (c) (d) (e) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, for such or similar merchandise;

> That cost of production is the proper basis of value;

> That the cost of production of said merchandise as defined in Section 402 (f) is equivalent to the invoice unit values, packed, and that there was no higher value;

> That the appeal to reappraisement herein may be submitted for decision on the foregoing stipulation.

On the agreed facts I find the cost of production, as that value is defined in section 402 (f) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values were the invoice unit values, packed.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.