alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 88 (Tuesday, May 8, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 26151]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-8779]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[WY-957-07-1910-BJ-5GKV]


Notice of Filing of Plats of Survey, Nebraska

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) is scheduled to file the 
plat of survey of the lands described below thirty (30) calendar days 
from the date of this publication in the BLM Wyoming State Office, 
Cheyenne, Wyoming.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bureau of Land Management, 5353 
Yellowstone Road, P.O. Box 1828, Cheyenne, Wyoming 82003.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This survey was executed at the request of 
the Bureau of Indian Affairs and is necessary for the management of 
these lands. The lands surveyed are:
    The plat and field notes representing the dependent resurvey of 
portions of the subdivisional lines, the subdivision of section lines, 
and the 1928-29 adjusted meander lines of the dry bed of old lake 
(locally known as Lawless Lake), and the survey of the subdivision of 
section 30, of Township 25 North, Range 10 East, of the Sixth Principal 
Meridian, Nebraska.
    Copies of the preceding described plat and field notes are 
available to the public at a cost of $1.10 per page.

    Dated: May 2, 2007.
John P. Lee,
Chief Cadastral Surveyor, Division of Support Services.
 [FR Doc. E7-8779 Filed 5-7-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4467-22-P
110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 313 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), 

3 SECTION 1. USE OF ROTUNDA FOR CEREMONY HONORING 

4 THOSE SERVING IN AFGHANISTAN AND IRAQ. 

5 (a) USE OF ROTUNDA.—The Rotunda of the Capitol 

6 is authorized to be used on March 13, 2008, for a cere7 mony to honor the 5 years of service and sacrifice of our 
2 

•HCON 313 EH 

1 troops and their families in the war in Iraq and to remem2 ber those who are serving our Nation in Afghanistan and 

3 throughout the world. 

4 (b) PREPARATIONS.—Physical preparations for the 

5 ceremony referred to in subsection (a) shall be carried out 

6 in accordance with such conditions as the Architect of the 

7 Capitol may prescribe. 

Passed the House of Representatives March 10, 

2008. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 313 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Authorizing the use of the rotunda of the Capitol 

out the world. serving our Nation in Afghanistan and throughthe war in Iraq and to remember those who are and sacrifice of our troops and their families in for a ceremony to honor the 5 years of service
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Michael L. AGUILAR, aka Michael Aguilar, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 04-50554.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Sept. 14, 2005.*

Decided Sept. 20, 2005.

Beong-Soo Kim, Ausa, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Brian A. Newman, Esq., Culver City, CA, for D efendant-App ellant.

Before: FARRIS, THOMPSON, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Appellant Michael Aguilar appeals the imposition of a 27-month sentence for pos*892session of methamphetamine in violation of his supervised release, claiming that the sentence should have run concurrently with a completed 10-month sentence he has already completed for reporting violations of supervised release.

We review the application of policies laid out in the sentencing guidelines for abuse of discretion. The district court in Aguilar’s case did not abuse its discretion in following the guideline policies, and gave adequate reasons for its decision. *See*USSG § 7B1.3(f); *United States v. Cervantes-Valenzuela,*931 F.2d 27, 29 (9th Cir.1991).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Exhibit 34.16

 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Management of C-III Asset Management LLC:

We have examined management of C-III Asset Management LLC’s (the “Company”) assertion that the Company complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB for all transactions for which the Company acted as servicer involving first lien commercial mortgage loans (the “Platform”), excluding criteria 1122(d)(1)(iii), 1122(d)(2)(ii), 1122(d)(3)(i) – 1122(d)(3)(iv), 1122(d)(4)(ii), 1122(d)(4)(v), 1122(d)(4)(ix) and 1122(d)(4)(xv), which management has determined are not applicable to the activities performed by the Company with respect to the Platform, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Assessment of Compliance with Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB Servicing Criteria dated February 10, 2020 as of and for the year ended December 31, 2019. The Company’s management is responsible for its assertion. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assertion about the Company’s compliance with the specified requirements based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the examination to obtain reasonable assurance about whether management’s assertion about compliance with the specified requirements is fairly stated, in all material respects. An examination involves performing procedures to obtain evidence about whether management’s assertion is fairly stated, in all material respects. The nature, timing, and extent of the procedures selected depend on our judgment, including an assessment of the risks of material misstatement of management’s assertion, whether due to fraud or error. We believe that the evidence we obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance with the specified requirements.

In our opinion, management’s assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Assessment of Compliance with Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB Servicing Criteria dated February 10, 2020 as of and for the year ended December 31, 2019 is fairly stated, in all material respects.

Asheville, North Carolina February 10, 2020
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Fact Book on Manpower: September, 1954

              																	United States. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 						*Fact Book on Manpower: September, 1954 : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 1171*,												Washington: 								U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 										September 1954,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/4476,			accessed on September 25, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
#### Baker *versus*Carleton *& al.*

In a disclosure upon a poor debtor’s bond, the father of the debtor, being objected to by the creditor, is incompetent to act as one of the justices of the peace and quorum.

But, if the debtor take the prescribed oath before two such justices, of whom his father is one, the damage for the breach of the bond is to be assessed under the provisions of the statute of 1848, c. 85.

Debt on a poor debtor’s relief-bond.

The debtors took the oath prescribed by the statute before' two justices of the peace and quorum, one of whom was their^ father. He was selected by them, and was objected to by the plaintiff.

If that proceeding constitutes a defence, the plaintiff is to be nonsuited. Otherwise the defendant is to be defaulted, with damages according to law, to be adjudged by the court.

*N. H. Hubbard,*for plaintiff.

One of the justices was interested. Consequently the pro*336ceedings were invalid, and the plaintiff is entitled to a judgment according to the R. S. c. 148, .§> 39, unless he is to be restricted by the Act of August 11, 1848.

The defendants do not bring themselves within the provisions of the Act of 1848, they not having *“*been allowed by two justices of the peace and quorum to take,” &c. according to the provisions of the second section of said Act.

When the statute speaks of “ two justices of the peace and quorum,” it intends such justices as are not disqualified by statute. *Bramhall*v. *Seavey,*28 Maine, 45.

___ ___ for defendants.

The bond has been literally complied with. But, if the court consider it to have been broken, *actual*damage only can be assessed. R. S. c. 115, § 78; *Daggett*v. *Bartlett,*22 Maine, 227 ; *Rider*v. *Thompson,*23 Maine, 244 ; *Ware*v. *Jackson,*24 Maine, 166.

In *Niel*v. *Ford,*21 Maine, 440, it was decided, that the justices had no jurisdiction. Yet the statute relieved as to damage. The other cases cited are to the same effect.

It was for. giving relief in cases like this, that the Act of 1848 was passed. *Call*v. *Barker,*28 Maine, 319.

Tenney, J.,

orally.—In *Bard*v. *Wood,*30 Maine, 155, it was decided that a justice holding the relationship of uncle to both of the parties, was disqualified to sit in the hearing of the disclosure. The question as to the effect of one of the justice’s incompetency, has often been before the court; and it has been supposed that the statute of 1848, chap. 85, was intended to embrace all such cases.

In this case the bond has been broken, and the damages are to be assessed according to the provisions of that statute. The only light we have on this subject is furnished by the statement filed in the case, from which it appears, that the principal debtors were worthess, and that the oath prescribed in Revised Statutes, chap. 148, sect. 28, was administered to them.

*337The plaintiff is entitled to judgment for one cent damages, and one-fourth of a cent costs.

*Defendants defaulted.*
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 279 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 279

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That when the House adjourns on the legislative day of Wednesday, 
January 23, 2008, on a motion offered pursuant to this concurrent 
resolution by its Majority Leader or his designee, it stand adjourned 
until 2 p.m. on Monday, January 28, 2008, or until the time of any 
reassembly pursuant to section 2 of this

              

 concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first; and that when the House 
adjourns on the legislative day of Tuesday, January 29, 2008, on a 
motion offered pursuant to this concurrent resolution by its Majority 
Leader or his designee, it stand adjourned until 2 p.m. on Wednesday, 
February 6, 2008, or until the time of any reassembly pursuant to 
section 2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first.
    Sec. 2.  The Speaker or her designee, after consultation with the 
Minority Leader, shall notify the Members of the House to reassemble at 
such place and time as she may designate if, in her opinion, the public 
interest shall warrant it.

            Passed the House of Representatives January 16, 2008.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
110th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                            H. CON. RES. 279

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

        Providing for a conditional adjournment of the House of 
                            Representatives.
```
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN

Bonorablc F. L. Lassie county AuOitor Wilbarser County Vernon, Taxas Dear Eirt~



### A an opinion by thir departm -The ae88ione has been oonfro

*ah 

### a 00naitiOh 

### v&at e’y take to ebbcain and 0part 

### au8or 

### ~a0iinquent a property pleas& on the roll8 and In a,tax bearIn@ oo~ltion?~ stion which you **have**subaitted to us Is vsrp broad ir?its aoops and nature ana wewill not attempt to answer it speolfloall~.

Re are enoloslng sopiaa of our opinions nwhiea O-930, O-1342, O-1462 and O-1043, whloh webelieve will be of help and assidtanoe to you. There opinions are a8lfs~lanatory andwill not be elaborated upon hera*
**! ’** Ssotlon 5of Art:ele 1345-b, Vernon'n Civil UtatutsB af Tmab, provide8 t&t qmn the trial of a tax suit tba court 

### mayhear 8tlamo~ and make 

### a rlnaing a@ 

### a gnrt sf the judgreent, of the renmnab2o fair valid for WljU4~06 omlue") of the 9~096rt~ 8~ of the date of tbc trial 

### whloh Yaajuagaa oaluen ahall *not naoaeearily be the raloe at tho $imethe asseaaxent of the tawra8 mado.c Oureonienaoo @9lnian ITo.3098, a 009~ of whloh 18 enolosed, disoruoer the tax year8, uhloh 8814 seatian 18 ap9lloablo. W thiak thiB ~rorlstoa of the Itstuto might aor& a mean8of rrl~lof ln ruoh oa888 a8 are **~for~d** 

## toin faur 

### inquiry. Yotrrrrory 

# truly

Harold ~0Ora~~

A88tiburb 

### BylxaI lcNo5oBoR1cs
Exhibit 4.21.5  APPENDIX
NO. 4  to Agency
Agreement  No. 36-06-23 dt.              2006  List of Associated Operators  Ref
  No.
  
  Operators full
  name
  
  Operators trade
  name
  
  License
  number
  
  Legal address
  
  Physical 
  address1.2.3.   OAO Rostelecom:
  
  Operator:General Director
  
  General DirectorOAO Rostelecom
  
  OJSC VolgaTelecomD.Ye. Yerokhin
  
  S.V. OMELCHENKO2006
  
  2006Seal here
  
  Seal here  154
Case No. 6,933.

#### HURST v. JONES.

[4 Dall. 353.]

Circuit Court, D. Pennsylvania.

May Term, 1801.

Ejectment — Former Suit — Nox Pros — Costs —Trial.

[This was an action by the lessee of Hurst against Jones.]

A former ejectment, between the same parties, for the same land,' had been non pros’d; but the costs of suit remained unpaid. The defendant’s counsel objected to the trial of the present ejectment, until the costs of the former were paid.

[In Case No. 6,934 certain depositions were offered and received upon the trial to prove descent.]

Mr. Rawle) for plaintiff.

E. Tilghman, for defendant.

BT THE COURT.

The objection is reasonable and just. The defendant cannot, under such circumstances, be compelled to proceed to a trial. The cause continued.
No. 53786.

protests 521626-G, etc. (New York).

#### R. H. Macy & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Rao, J.

By virtue of the decision in *United States*v. *American Viscose Corporation*(30 C. C. P. A. 240, C. A. D. 239), the protests were dismissed.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 87 (Monday, May 7, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 25786]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-8697]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Advisory Committee for Polar Programs; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 
as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the following 
meeting:
    Name: Advisory Committee for Polar Programs (1130).
    Date/Time: May 17, 2007, 12 p.m. to 2 p.m.
    Place: National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Room 
770, Arlington VA.
    Type of Meeting: Open (Teleconference).
    Contact Person: Sue LaFratta, Office of Polar Programs (OPP). 
National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington VA 22230 
(703) 292-8030.
    Minutes: May be obtained from the contact person list above.
    Reason for Late Notice: Due to scheduling conflicting schedules of 
members and the necessity to proceed.
    Purpose of Meeting: To advise NSF on the impact of its policies, 
programs, and activities of the polar research community, to provide 
advice to the Director of OPP on issues related to long-range planning.
    Agenda: Division of Arctic and Antarctic Sciences Committee of 
Visitors reports.

    Dated: May 2, 2007.
Susanne Bolton,
Committee Management Officer.
 [FR Doc. E7-8697 Filed 5-4-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
EXHIBIT 32.2

                              TWL CORPORATION

             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
               SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Trinity Learning
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December
31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, Patrick R Quinn, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
          or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
          and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of
          operations of the Company.


Date:  February 14, 2007           /S/ Patrick R Quinn
                                   ---------------------------------------
                                       Patrick R Quinn
                                       Chief Financial Officer


     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906
     has been provided to TWL Corporation and will be retained by it and
     furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
     request.
|  EXHIBIT 10.1.4                             |
|--------------------------------------------------|
|  Union Carbide Corporation and Subsidiaries |
|                                             |

|  The Dow Chemical Company                    |  Union Carbide Corporation                                                                      |   |
|---------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                              |                                                                                                 |   |
|  By: /s/ WILLIAM L. CURRY               |  By:  /s/ EUDIO GIL                                                                   |   |
|  Name: William L. Curry                 |  Name:  Eudio Gil                                                                     |   |
|  Title:   Assistant Secretary |  Title:   Vice President, Chief Financial                                        |   |
|                                              |               Officer and Treasurer |   |

----
#### United States *v.*Waterbury Clock Co., Ingersoll Division

No. 6280.

Entry No. 141.

Invoice dated Hamilton, Canada, April 3, 1943.

Certified April 3, 1943.

Entered at Bridgeport, Conn., April 13, 1943.

(Decided June 3, 1946)

*Paul P. Bao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the plaintiff.

Defendant not represented by counsel.

Olivee, Presiding Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation entered into by and between the respective parties hereto:

It is hereby stipulated and agreed, subject to the approval of the court, that the market value or price at the time of exportation of the merchandise involved herein, at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, is as follows:

Mechanism Securing Screws_BFB-16 (#85)--@ U. S. $17.741 All prices net

Holding Screws_ BFM-55 (#55)-_@ U. S. 19.16r packed

Mechanism Holding Screws_BFB-21 (#89)_.@ U. S. 5.17.1 per 1,000

It is further stipulated and agreed that there was no higher export value for the merchandise herein at the time of exportation thereof.

It is further agreed that this case may be submitted on the foregoing stipulation.

On the agreed facts I find the foreign value, as that value is defined in section 402 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended by the Administrative Act of 1938, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are as follows:

Mechanism Securing Screws_BFB-16 (#85)_@ U. S. $17.74] All prices net

Holding Screws_ BFM-55 (#55)U. S. 19.16i packed

Mechanism Holding Screws_BFB-21 (#89)_.@ U. S. 5.17.1 per 1,000

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
No. 43106.

#### Protest 11185-K of London House Ltd. (New York).

Opinion by

Brown, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of clothes brushes and hat brushes similar to those the subject of *United States*v. *379
      *Heinrich, Hermann & Weiss*(26 C. C. P. A. 292, C. A. D. 30). The claim at 50 percent under paragraph 1506 was therefore sustained.