alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 89 (Wednesday, May 9, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 26339]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-8855]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

[I.D. 050307C]


Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council; Public Meeting

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of a public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council will convene a 
public meeting of the Ad Hoc Aquaculture Advisory Panel (AP).

DATES: The Ad Hoc Aquaculture AP meeting will convene at 8 a.m. on 
Wednesday, May 30, 2007 and conclude Thursday, May 31, 2007 no later 
than 1 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Wyndham Westshore, 4860 W. 
Kennedy Blvd., Tampa, FL 33609; telephone: (813) 286-4400.
    Council address: Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council, 2203 
North Lois Avenue, Suite 1100, Tampa, FL 33607.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Wayne Swingle, Executive Director, 
telephone (813) 348-1630.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Ad Hoc Aquaculture AP will be convened 
to review an options paper for ``Generic Amendment to provide for 
Regulation of Offshore Marine Aquaculture''. The options paper provides 
alternatives and conditions for permitting offshore (EEZ) facilities to 
conduct aquaculture of species of fish endemic to the Gulf of Mexico. 
The options paper, when completed, will constitute the pubic hearing 
draft for this activity.
    Although other non-emergency issues not on the agenda may come 
before the Ad Hoc Aquaculture AP for discussion, in accordance with the 
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (Magnuson-
Stevens Act), those issues may not be the subject of formal action 
during these meetings. Actions of the Ad Hoc Aquaculture AP will be 
restricted to those issues specifically identified in the agenda and 
any issues arising after publication of this notice that require 
emergency action under Section 305(c) of the Magnuson-Stevens Act, 
provided the public has been notified of the Council's intent to take 
action to address the emergency.
    Copies of the agenda can be obtained by calling (813) 348-1630.

Special Accommodations

    This meeting is physically accessible to people with disabilities. 
Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aids 
should be directed to Tina Trezza at the Council (see ADDRESSES) at 
least 5 working days prior to the meeting.

    Dated: May 4, 2007.
Tracey L. Thompson,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine 
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. E7-8855 Filed 5-8-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 86 (Friday, May 4, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 25317]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-8591]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Disease, Disability, and Injury Prevention and Control Special 
Emphasis Panel: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Grants 
for Public Health Research Dissertation, Program Announcement (PA) PAR-
07-231

    In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention announces a meeting of the aforementioned Special Emphasis 
Panel.

    Times and Dates: 8 a.m.-5 p.m., June 14, 2007 (Closed). 8:30 
a.m.-5 p.m., June 15, 2007 (Closed).
    Place: Doubletree Hotel Buckhead, 3342 Peachtree Road NE, 
Atlanta, GA 30326, telephone 404-321-1234.
    Status: The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance 
with provisions set forth in Section 552b(c) (4) and (6), Title 5 
U.S.C., and the Determination of the Director, Management Analysis 
and Services Office, CDC, pursuant to Public Law 92-463.
    Matters to be Discussed: The meeting will include the review, 
discussion, and evaluation of ``CDC Grants for Public Health 
Research Dissertation,'' PA PAR-07-231.
    Contact Person For More Information: Juliana Cyril, Ph.D., 
M.P.H, Scientific Review Administrator, Office of the Chief Science 
Officer, CDC, 1600 Clifton Road NE., Mailstop D74, Atlanta, GA 
30333, Telephone 404-639-4639.
    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining 
to announcements of meetings and other committee management 
activities, for both CDC and the Agency for Toxic Substances and 
Disease Registry.

    Dated: April 27, 2007.
Elaine L. Baker,
Acting Director, Management Analysis and Services Office Centers for 
Disease Control and Prevention.
 [FR Doc. E7-8591 Filed 5-3-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
Restated
   Certificate of Incorporation
           of
      Varlen Corporation
(Amended and Effective May 27, 1998)


The Restated Certificate of Incorporation shall be amended
by deleting the first paragraph of Article FOURTH in its
entirety and substituting in lieu thereof the following:

     FOURTH:  The total number of shares of all classes of
     stock which the Corporation is authorized to issue is
     forty million five hundred thousand (40,500,000), of
     which five hundred thousand (500,000) shares shall be
     Preferred Stock with a par value of one dollar ($1.00)
     per share and of which forty million (40,000,000)
     shares shall be Common Stock with a par value of ($.10)
     per share.  The amount of authorized stock of the
     Corporation of any class or classes may be increased or
     decreased by a majority of the stock of the Corporation
     entitled to vote.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management 

          - [NM-920-1310-07; TXNM 115039] 

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior. 

# ACTION:

Notice of reinstatement of terminated oil and gas lease. 

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to the provisions of 43 CFR 3108.2-3(b)(2), Energy Equities, Inc. timely filed a petition for reinstatement of oil and gas lease TXNM 115039 for lands in Shelby County, Texas, and was accompanied by all required rentals and royalties accruing from December 1, 2006, the date of termination. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Becky C. Olivas, BLM, New Mexico  State Office, (505) 438-7609. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    No valid lease has been issued affecting the lands. The lessee has agreed to new lease terms for rentals and royalties at rates of $10.00 per acre or fraction thereof and 16 2/3 percent, respectively. The lessee has paid the required $500.00 administrative fee and has reimbursed the Bureau of Land  Management for the cost of this                     **Federal Register**                     notice.  The lessee has met all the requirements for reinstatement of the lease as set out in Sections 31(d) and (e) of the Mineral Leasing Act of 1920 (30 U.S.C. 188), and the Bureau of Land Management is proposing to reinstate the lease effective December 1, 2006, subject to the original terms and conditions of the lease and the increased rentals and royalty rates cited above.                 

Dated: April 25, 2007. 

Becky C. Olivas, 

Land Law Examiner,  Fluids Adjudication Team 1.

 [FR Doc. E7-8488 Filed 5-2-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-FB-P
Exhibit 12.2  I, Roman A. Frolov, certify that:  1.I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F
ofOJSC Long-Distance and International
Telecommunications Rostelecom;  2.Based on my knowledge, this report does
not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under
which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;  3.Based on my knowledge, the financial
statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations
and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;  4.The companys other certifying officer
and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))
and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in the Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and
15d-15(f)) for the company and have:  (a)Designed such disclosure controls and
procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;  (b)Designed such internal control over
financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting
to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding
the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;  (c)Evaluated the effectiveness of the
companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,
as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and  (d)Disclosed in this report any change in
the companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the companys internal control over
financial reporting; and  5.The companys other certifying officer
and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control
over financial reporting, to the companys auditors and the audit committee of
the companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):  (a)All significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the companys ability
to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that
involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the
companys internal control over financial reporting.   Date:       December 17, 2007/s/ Roman A. FrolovRoman A. FrolovChief Accountant (CFO)
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-1545

JANIS J. WEYBREW,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States Tax Court. (14868-10-L)

Submitted: October 18, 2011 Decided: October 20, 2011

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Janis J. Weybrew, Appellant Pro Se. Gilbert Steven Rothenberg, 

Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Sara Ann Ketchum, Bridget 

Maria Rowan, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, 

D.C., for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Janis J. Weybrew appeals the tax court’s order 

sustaining the Commissioner’s collection determination and 

imposing sanctions pursuant to I.R.C. § 6673 (2006). We have 

reviewed the record and the tax court’s opinion and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated 

by the tax court. Weybrew v. Comm’r of Internal Revenue, Tax 

Ct. No. 14868-10-L (U.S. Tax Ct. Feb. 16, 2011). We dispense 

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before the court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### Robert C. HART, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Laura B. FITZPATRICK, Clark County Treasurer, Defendant—Appellee.

No. 04-17557.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 12, 2005.*

Decided Sept. 15, 2005.

Robert C. Hart, Las Vegas, NV, pro se.

Mark E. Wood, Esq., Clark County District Attorney’s Office, Las Vegas, NV, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before: REINHARDT, RYMER, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Robert C. Hart appeals pro se the district court’s order dismissing his action alleging that Clark County Treasurer, Laura B. Fitzpatrick, violated his constitutional rights by attempting to collect taxes on his real property. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district court’s dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, *Jerron West, Inc. v. Cal. State Bd. of Equalization,*129 F.3d 1334, 1337 (9th Cir.1997), and we affirm.

The district court properly held that it lacked jurisdiction over Hart’s action because he already attempted, unsuccessfully, to obtain a state court judgment against appellee over the same property at issue in the instant action. *See*28 U.S.C. § 1341 (“The district courts shall not enjoin, suspend or restrain the assessment, levy or collection of any tax under State law where a plain, speedy and efficient remedy may be had in the courts of such State.”); *Patel v. City of San Bernardino,*310 F.3d 1138, 1140 (9th Cir.2002) (prohibiting declaratory and injunctive relief in federal court where taxpayer has adequate state court remedy and proscribing claims for damages).

Hart’s remaining contentions lack merit.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
### Ground waters and irrigation enterprises in the foothill belt, southern California

By: Walter Curran Mendenhall

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp219

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 3**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 4**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 5**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 6**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 7**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 8**                            (5385 pdf)                        
  - **Plate 9**                            (5113 pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
# C_2017038EN.01002802.xml

| 6.2.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 38/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.2.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 38/28

---

Judgment of the General Court of 15 December 2016 — Aldi v EUIPO — Miquel Alimentació Grup (Gourmet)

(Case T-212/15) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative mark Gourmet - Earlier national word and figurative marks GOURMET and Gourmet - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Similarity of the signs - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2017/C 038/38)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Aldi GmbH & Co. KG (Mülheim an der Ruhr, Germany) (represented by: C. Fürsen, N. Lützenrath, U. Rademacher and N. Bertram, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Eberl and M. Fischer, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Miquel Alimentació Grup, SA (Vilamalla, Spain) (represented by: C. Duch Fonoll and R. Niebel, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 24 February 2015 (Case R 0314/2014-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Miquel Alimentació Grup and Aldi.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Aldi GmbH & Co. KG to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Aldi GmbH & Co. KG to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 198, 15.6.2015.

1

---
#### Pacific Trading Co., c/o Universal Foreign Service Co. *v.*United States

No. 6084.

Invoices dated Tokyo, Japan, July 21, 1937, etc.

Certified July 21, 1937, etc.

Entered at Los Angeles, Calif., August 27, 1937, etc.

Entry No. 3514, etc.

(Decided January 15, 1945)

*Lawrence & Twltle '{George B. Tuttle*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Bao,*Assistant Attorney General *(Daniel I. Auster,*special attorney), for the defendant.

Ekwall, Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation entered into by the parties hereto:

> It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between counsel for plaintiff and the Assistant Attorney General, attorney for the "United States, subject to the approval of the court, as to merchandise covered by the reappraisement appeals listed in annexed schedule:

> (1) That this stipulation is limited to so much of said merchandise as is described in the invoices as clams in 5-ounce cans or tins, such items being marked A and initialed by Examiner *G. B. Gulick,*and said article being appraised on the basis of the American selling price in accordance with the Presidential proclamation published in T. D. 47031.

> (2) That such merchandise is the same in all material respects as the imported clams involved in *United States*v. *Mutual Supply Co. et al.*and *Mutual Supply Co. et al.*v. *United States,*Reap. Dec. 5950, and that the issues herein are the same in all material respects as the issues involved in said decision.

> (3) That upon the dates of exportation to the United States of the merchandise covered by these appeals, like or similar merchandise manufactured or produced in the United States was being freely offered for sale and sold to all purchasers in the principal market of the United States in the ordinary course of trade and in the usual wholesale quantities, including all containers and coverings and all costs, charges, and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition packed ready for delivery, at the following prices per doaen cans or tins, less a cash discount of 1)4 per centum:

> (4) That the record in said Reap. Dec. 5950 may be incorporated herein and that upon this stipulation these appeals may be deemed submitted, they being limited to the items marked A on the invoices, and abandoned as to all other merchandise.

*289On the agreed facts I find that as to the 5-ounce tins, marked A on the invoice and initialed by the examiner as set forth in the above stipulation, the American selling price as defined in section 402 (g) of the Tariff Act of 1930 is the proper basis for appraisement and that such statutory value is $1 per dozen tins, less *V/2*per centum cash discount.

The appeals having been abandoned as to all other merchandise, they are dismissed insofar as they relate thereto.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
Exhibit
32.1


Certification
of CEO Pursuant to
 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350,
 As
Adopted Pursuant to
 Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of U.S. Energy Corp. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Keith G. Larsen Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:
 
 (1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 
 
 
 /s/
      Keith G. LarsenKeith
      G. Larsen,Chief
      Executive OfficerNovember
      6, 2008
 
 
 This
certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.
 
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
U.S. Energy Corp. and will be retained by U.S. Energy Corp. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.