alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, I, Scott C. Mahan, Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer, certify that: 1. To my knowledge, this report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. To my knowledge, the information in this report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of BSQUARE Corporation as ofDecember 31, 2007.Date: February 15, 2008          /s/ Scott C. Mahan   Scott C. Mahan   Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer
08/19/2010 14:23 FAX 2024935142 FAA •> DM S 

I V - •* \ / • ^^k . A V £ , ^U(«>XV D 

ElOOI/002 

(3001/002 

pz- mm;\ 

U.S. DEPARTMENT Of TRANSPORTATION 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

In the Matter of Wisconsin Aviation, Inc. 

Honorable Richard C, Goodwin 

) 

) 

)FAA . Docket No. CP10SW0009 

cpO/O-OS'V^-

WITHDRAWAL OF COMPLAINT 

On May IS, 2010, the Federal Aviation Administratibn ("Agency") filed the 

complaifit in this matter wherein the agency alleged that Wisconsin Aviation, Inc. 

("Wisconsin Aviation") violated 14 C.FJl. § 135.251(a), and 14 C.F.R. Part 121, 

Appendix I §V.A. 1. and requested the Administrative Law Judge to enter an order 

assessing Respondent a civil penalty in the amount of $20,000. The parties have ^ettl(^ 

this matter and the Agency hereby withdraws the complaint. 

Peter J. Lynch 

Assistant Chief Counsel 

for enforcement 

BY: 

Aq^mn Eilfingham 

Office of the Chief Counsel 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Ave.,.S,W. 

Washington, DC. 20591 

(202) 267-7728 

OPDONAL POHM 0$ (T-Btl) 

F A X TRANSMITTA L » «< ptflet ». 

i:^tAitrr>.—i^-^'- i^^-< 

• ^ 

/^^•Ki/vx.i v K«"lli, ^ 1. ^ 

DteUAOtnct 

NSH 7^40-01-s^•^-^^eB 50»-ioi 

F m f 

^^P.'^AS^.- <*^ ^ SEKeftAL Seflvce s »OMINIETH»TlON 
08/19/2010 14:23 F*X 202,935142 F.. ' »«S a»02/.« 

OS/ia/ilOlO 13:40 FAX 202 2675106 1^00^/002 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that the foregoing Withdrawal of Complaint, in the Matter of Wisco'osin 

Aviation, Inc., has been mailed this date by feicsimile and Certified Mail, Return Receipt 

Requested, to: 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin 

Administtadve Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building Ground Floor 

Room El 2-320 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

Jef&cy D. Baxim 

President 

Wisconsin Aviation, Inc. 

1741 River Drive 

Watertown, Wl 53094 

The original and a copy was also mailed this date by facsimile aftd Certified Mail-Return 

Receipt Requested to: 

Hearing Docket (Original and 1 copy) 

Room 2014, AGC^OO 

Federal Aviation Administration 

600 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

m u d )}iriAyLr-^ 

August 19,2010
Comment Info: =================

General Comment:FAA-2011-0305
<PAGE>   1
                       UGI UTILITIES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
        COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES - EXHIBIT 12.1
                             (THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                                 
                                                 Three                                              Nine
                                                 Months                                            Months        Year
                                                 Ended           Year Ended September 30,           Ended        Ended
                                              December 31,  ---------------------------------    September 30, December 31,
                                                 1996         1996         1995         1994        1993          1992
                                               -------      -------      -------      -------      -------      -------
<S>                                            <C>          <C>          <C>          <C>          <C>          <C>    
EARNINGS:
Earnings before income taxes                   $26,101      $61,717      $39,759      $41,244      $28,009      $43,054
Interest expense                                 4,199       15,921       16,632       16,482       12,664       21,913
Amortization of debt discount and expense           43          173          206          187          147          250
Interest component of rental expense               566        1,838        1,604        1,344          953        1,256
                                               -------      -------      -------      -------      -------      -------
                                               $30,909      $79,649      $58,201      $59,257      $41,773      $66,473
                                               =======      =======      =======      =======      =======      =======


FIXED CHARGES:
Interest expense                               $ 4,199      $15,921      $16,632      $16,482      $12,664      $21,913
Amortization of debt discount and expense           43          173          206          187          147          250
Allowance for funds used during
     construction (capitalized interest)            16          107           65          136           87           57
Interest component of rental expense               566        1,838        1,604        1,344          953        1,256
                                               -------      -------      -------      -------      -------      -------
                                               $ 4,824      $18,039      $18,507      $18,149      $13,851      $23,476
                                               =======      =======      =======      =======      =======      =======

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                6.41         4.42         3.14         3.27         3.02         2.83
                                               =======      =======      =======      =======      =======      =======
</TABLE>
**Exhibit      32.1**

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company                for the periods reflected therein. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:                February 13, 2008 |   | /s/                Harvey B. Grossblatt |
|----------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------|
|                                   |   | Harvey                B. Grossblatt     |
|                                   |   | Chief                Executive Officer  |
|                                   |   |                                    |
|                                   |   |                                    |
|                                   |   | /s/                James B. Huff        |
|                                   |   | James                B. Huff            |
|                                   |   | Chief                Financial Officer  |

----
No. 45213.

#### Protest 972448-G of Wm. Shaland (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the merchandise in question was held dutiable as follows: (1) Pipe kazoos, trick daggers, tin kazoos, and siren whistles at 45 percent under paragraph 397, Abstracts 44122, 37637, 32264, 39948, and 40480 followed; (2) squawker balloons and cigarette whistles in part of bamboo similar to those the subject of Abstracts 40493 and 39509 at 45 percent under paragraph 409; and (3) novelties in chief value of fur at 5)0 percent under paragraph 1519 (e), Abstract 41823 followed.
**IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS**

No. 09-0131

IN RE  SCI TEXAS FUNERAL SERVICES, INC. DBA HIGHLAND MEMORIAL PARK; AND SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus

**ORDERED:**

1.Relators’ motion for temporary relief and for expedited consideration, filed February 13, 2009, is granted.  All trial court proceedings in Cause No. C-1186-04-G, styled *Leticia G. Leal, Frank Garza, Beatriz Cavazos, Noe Cavazos, Maria Elena Cisneros, Petra Lopez, Catherine E. Rogers, Evelyn Rogers, and Gerald Rogers v. SCI Texas Funeral Services, Inc. d/b/a Highland Memorial Park and Service Corporation International*, in the 370th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas, are stayed pending further order of this Court.

2.The real parties in interest are requested to respond to relators’ petition for writ of mandamus on or before 3:00 p.m., February 27, 2009.

3.The petition for writ of mandamus remains pending before this Court.

Done at the City of Austin, this February 17, 2009.

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk

Supreme Court of Texas

By Claudia Jenks, Chief Deputy Clerk
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 87 (Monday, May 7, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 25829-25830]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-8594]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration <greek-i>10854]


Iowa Disaster <greek-i>IA-00007 Declaration of Economic Injury

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Economic Injury Disaster Loan (EIDL) 
declaration for the State of Iowa, dated 04/27/2007.
    Incident: Winter Storms.
    Incident Period: 02/23/2007 through 03/02/2007.

EFFECTIVE DATE: 04/27/2007.
    EIDL Loan Application Deadline Date: 01/28/2008.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing And Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration,

[[Page 25830]]

409 3rd Street, SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the Administrator's EIDL declaration, applications for economic injury 
disaster loans may be filed at the address listed above or other 
locally announced locations.
    The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected 
by the disaster:

Primary Counties:
    Bremer, Crawford, Grundy, Hardin, Iowa, Jasper, Mahaska, Marshall, 
Mitchell, Poweshiek, Scott, Shelby.
Contiguous Counties:
    Iowa: Audubon, Benton, Black Hawk, Buchanan, Butler, Carroll, Cass, 
Cedar, Cerro Gordo, Chickasaw, Clinton, Fayette, Floyd, Franklin, 
Hamilton, Harrison, Howard, Ida, Johnson, Keokuk, Linn, Marion, Monona, 
Monroe, Muscatine, Polk, Pottawattamie, Sac, Story, Tama, Wapello, 
Washington, Woodbury, Worth, Wright.
    Illinois: Rock Island.
    Minnesota: Mower.
    The Interest Rate is: 4.000.
    The number assigned to this disaster for economic injury is 108540.
    The States which received an EIDL Declaration <greek-i> are Iowa, 
Illinois and Minnesota.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59002)

    Dated: April 27, 2007.
Steven C. Preston,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. E7-8594 Filed 5-4-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
### Court of Appeal s, State of Michigan 

### ORDER Kathy Smith v Board of County Road Commissioners Docket No. 334226 LC No . 2015-148043-CH Thomas C. Cameron Presiding Judge Deborah A. Servitto Elizabeth 

### L. Gleicher

Judges The Court orders that the Jan uary 4 , 20 1 8 op in ion is hereby AMENDED to correct a clerical error. The last sentence of the fi rst paragraph on page 5 is corrected to read: Because we conclude that defe nd ants' conduct was no t gross ly neg ligent , we need not address proximate cause. In all other respects, the January 4, 2018 opinion remains unchanged.

A true copy entered and certified 

### by Jerome W. Z imm er Jr., C hi ef C lerk , on 

# JAN 

# 1 D

# 2018 Date
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 89 (Wednesday, May 9, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26351-26352]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-8848]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP07-416-000]


Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company, LP; Notice of Tariff Filing

May 2, 2007.
    Take notice that on April 30, 2007, Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line 
Company, LP (Panhandle) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, Third Revised Volume No. 1, Third Revised Sheet No. 3B, to 
become effective June 1, 2007.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed in accordance with the provisions of 
Section 154.210 of the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 154.210). 
Anyone filing an intervention or protest must serve a copy of that 
document on the Applicant. Anyone filing an intervention or protest on 
or before the intervention or protest date need not serve motions to 
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a3e5e6f1e0eccdcfcacdc6f0d6d3d3ccd1d7e3c5c6d1c08dc4ccd5"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="51171403121e3f3d383f34022421213e232511373423327f363e27">[email protected]</span></a>, or call

[[Page 26352]]

(866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-8848 Filed 5-8-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 35.1

 

ANNUAL SERVICER’S COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE

 

This Compliance Certificate is furnishedpursuant to Section 4.10 of the Sale and Servicing Agreement (the “Agreement”), dated as of March 30, 2016, by andamong Hyundai Auto Receivables Trust 2016-A, Hyundai Capital America, as seller and servicer (the “Servicer”), HyundaiABS Funding, LLC, as depositor, and Citibank, N.A., as indenture trustee and Item 1123 of Regulation AB. The undersigned herebycertifies that:

 

1)          Iam a duly authorized officer of the Servicer.

 

2)          Areview of the activities of the Servicer from January 1, 2019 through December 31, 2019 (the “Relevant Period”) andof the Servicer’s performance under the Agreement during the Relevant Period has been made under my supervision.

 

3)          Basedon such review, the Servicer has, to the best of my knowledge, fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all materialrespects throughout the Relevant Period.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have duly executed this Compliance Certificatethis 13th day of March, 2020.
No. 49423.

#### Protests 7745-K, etc., of Marks & Rosenfeld, Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of glass candlesticks not designed for electrical illumination and that they are similar in all material respects'to those the subject of *Marks*v. *United States*(11 Cust. Ct. 66, C. D. 795) the protests were sustained to this extent.
DFPIOFTR M DOCKET S

- • -' A ' 1 A 11
- U l OST-2010-004 6 USDO T Secretar y Dea r Sir : Le t u s liv e an dbreath e i nmountai ntim e no t smothe r i ncentra l time . Kee p mountai ntim e fo r

Merce r county . Rura l Residen t Merce r Count y
Exhibit 12.1  I, Anton Yu.
Kolpakov, certify that:  1.I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of OJSC
Long-Distance and International Telecommunications Rostelecom;  2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4.The companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over
financial reporting (as defined in the Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and
15d-15(f)) for the company and have:  (a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the company, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b)Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision,
to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial
reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;  (c)Evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and  (d)Disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual
report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the companys internal control over financial reporting; and  5.The companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
companys auditors and the audit committee of the companys board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):  (a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the companys ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial information; and  (b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the companys internal control over
financial reporting.  Date: June 17, 2009
  /s/ ANTON YU. KOLPAKOVAnton Yu. KolpakovGeneral Director (CEO)
110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 309 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), 

3 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF USE OF CAPITOL 

4 GROUNDS FOR D.C. SPECIAL OLYMPICS LAW 

5 ENFORCEMENT TORCH RUN. 

6 On June 6, 2008, or on such other date as the Speak7 er of the House of Representatives and the Committee on 
2 

•HCON 309 EH 

1 Rules and Administration of the Senate may jointly des2 ignate, the 2008 District of Columbia Special Olympics 

3 Law Enforcement Torch Run (in this resolution referred 

4 to as the ‘‘event’’) may be run through the Capitol 

5 Grounds as part of the journey of the Special Olympics 

6 torch to the District of Columbia Special Olympics sum7 mer games. 

8 SEC. 2. RESPONSIBILITY OF CAPITOL POLICE BOARD. 

9 The Capitol Police Board shall take such actions as 

10 may be necessary to carry out the event. 

11 SEC. 3. CONDITIONS RELATING TO PHYSICAL PREPARA12 TIONS. 

13 The Architect of the Capitol may prescribe conditions 

14 for physical preparations for the event. 

15 SEC. 4. ENFORCEMENT OF RESTRICTIONS. 

16 The Capitol Police Board shall provide for enforce17 ment of the restrictions contained in section 5104(c) of 

18 title 40, United States Code, concerning sales, advertise19 ments, displays, and solicitations on the Capitol Grounds, 
3 

•HCON 309 EH 

1 as well as other restrictions applicable to the Capitol 

2 Grounds, in connection with the event. 

Passed the House of Representatives May 21, 2008. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 309 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the 

forcement Torch Run. District of Columbia Special Olympics Law En-
# C_2016200EN.01002001.xml

| 6.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 200/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 200/20

---

Judgment of the General Court of 20 April 2016 — Tronios Group International v EUIPO — Sky (SkyTec)

(Case T-77/15) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU word mark SkyTec - Earlier national word mark SKY - Relative ground for refusal - Limitation in consequence of acquiescence - Article 54(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009))

(2016/C 200/28)

Language of the case: Dutch

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Tronios Group International BV (Breda, Netherlands) (represented by: R. van Leeuwen and H. Klingenberg, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) (represented by: S. Crabbe and A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the General Court: Sky plc (Isleworth, United Kingdom) (represented initially by J. Barry, Solicitor, and subsequently by M. Schut and A. Meijboom, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 28 November 2014 (Case R 1681/2013-4), relating to invalidity proceedings between British Sky Broadcasting Group plc and Tronios Group International BV.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Tronios Group International BV to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO); |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Tronios Group International BV to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO);

| 3. | Orders Sky plc to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Sky plc to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 118, 13.4.2015.

1

---