alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 232 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 232

 It is the Sense of the Congress that the confidentiality mandates for 
    minors should be removed from family planning services programs 
operating under title X of the Public Health Services Act and Medicaid.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 10, 2007

 Mr. Marchant submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
            referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
 It is the Sense of the Congress that the confidentiality mandates for 
    minors should be removed from family planning services programs 
operating under title X of the Public Health Services Act and Medicaid.

Whereas title X of the Public Health Service Act, established by Congress, was 
        designed to assist in making comprehensive voluntary family planning 
        services readily available to all persons desiring such service;
Whereas these services, including the availability of contraception, were 
        extended to minors under the age of 16 as a result of the United States 
        Supreme Court decision in Carey v. Population Services International; 
        consequently, title X clinics can provide minors with free 
        contraceptives without a parent's knowledge or consent;
Whereas Medicaid funding for family planning was authorized to cover health care 
        services for low-income women through a cooperative Federal-State 
        program;
Whereas in Texas, any provider receiving title X funds from the State must also 
        provide services to Medicaid-eligible clients and the State cannot 
        require minors to obtain parental consent before receiving family 
        planning services including contraception;
Whereas these requirements effectively force the State to provide contraceptives 
        to children under the age of 16 in order to finance critical family 
        planning services and reduce the likelihood of parental involvement at a 
        time in a child's sexual development when emotional capacity is not 
        likely to correspond to physical maturity; and
Whereas family planning programs operating under title V and title XX of the 
        Social Security Act are not prohibited from requiring parental consent 
        for the dispensation of prescriptions, devaluing the implication that 
        confidentiality is a necessity and sending a mixed message to State 
        administrators of family planning programs: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of Congress that the confidentiality mandates for 
minors should be removed from family planning services programs 
operating under title X of the Public Health Services Act and Medicaid.
                                 <all>
```
(Reap. Dec. 9824)

#### Plywood & Door Western Corporation *v.*United States

Entry No. 5408, etc.

(Decided October 27, 1960)

*James Wilson Young*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Douh,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Mollison, Judge:

Counsel for the parties have submitted the appeals for reappraisement enumerated in schedule “A,” attached hereto, upon a stipulation on the basis of which I find that, except for the items of merchandise set forth in schedule “B,” also attached hereto, the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise involved in the said appeals for reappraisement is export value, as defined in section 402(d), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and that such value in each instance is the invoice unit value, less ocean freight and insurance, with no allowance for any discounts appearing on the invoices.

The appeals for reappraisement having been abandoned as to the merchandise specified in schedule “B,” they are, to that extent, dismissed.

Judgment will issue accordingly.

> *538Schedule B

> Los Angeles Entries, reappraisement Nos. R59/2388, etc.

> Reappraisement Entry Date of Description of Appraised per No. No. export merchandise M sq. feet

> R59/2812 25720 12/5/57

> Shipper: Ahlstrom, birch plywood as follows:

> BB/WG grade *%"*Invoice price

> 48" x 96" less N.D.C.

> 36"'x 96"

> 48" x 72"

> 60" x 60"

> 48" x 48"

> 48" x 36"

> Shipper: Kaukas, birch plywood as follows:

> BB/WG grade 34" thick Inv. price less N.D.C.

> 53 %" x 20%" etc.

> 44}á" x 27M" etc.

> BBJ/BB grade %" thick Inv. price less N.D.C.

> 3134" x 21 *%”*

> *53Vt"*x 22Ke"

> 44" x *22%"*etc.

> R59/2818 29007 2/14/57

> Shipper: Kaukas, O.Y., birch blockboards as follows:

> BJ/WG grade *%"*Inv. unit values

> 59" x 17" less ocean

> 53" x 17" freight and

> 30%" x *1Q%"*insurance

> *29Yi"*x 16%"

> 2834" x 28J4"

> Shipper: Kaukas, O. Y., birch blockboards as follows:

> BJ/WG grade, *%"*

> 44J4" x 5 *Yi"*

> 3234" x 14]4"

> 20J4" x 15J4"

> Inv. unit values less ocean freight and insurance

> R59/2820 27742 2/3/57

> Shipper: Enso-Gutzeit, birch plywood as follows:

> BB/WG grade, *%"*

> 18" x 20"

> Inv. unit values less ocean freight and insurance

> R59/2822 4272 6/25/57

> Shipper: Kaukas, O.Y., birch blockboards as follows:

> BJ grade *%"*

> 41 *jí"*x 13"

> *38}i" x*11 *%"*

> Inv. unit values less ocean freight and insurance

> BJ/WG grade, %"

> 62" x19"
304(m) CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE

EPA-HQ-OW-2010-0824

DCN CBM00664A1 

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT

CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION

(CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.
# C_2016287EN.01003502.xml

| 8.8.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 287/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.8.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 287/35

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Single Judge) of 28 June 2016 — Kotula v Commission

(Case F-118/15) (1)

1

((Civil service - Officials - Article 45 of the Staff Regulations - 2014 promotion exercise - General implementing provisions for Article 45 of the Staff Regulations - List of officials recommended for promotion by the Directors-General and Heads of Department - Omission of the applicant’s name - Inter-institutional transfer - Taking into account staff reports drawn up by the previous institution - Possibility of contesting the list of officials recommended for promotion before the Joint Promotions Committee - Consideration of the comparative merits of the officials eligible for promotion))

(2016/C 287/43)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Marcin Kotula (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: N. de Montigny and J.-N. Louis, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: C. Berardis-Kayser and G. Berscheid, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of the Commission’s decision not to promote the applicant in the 2014 promotion exercise.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders each party to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders each party to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 320, 28. 9. 2015, p. 57.

1

---
#### Mogi Momonoi *&*Co., Inc. *v.*United States

No. 6261.

Entry No. 860834, etc.

Invoices dated Yokohama, Japan, May 22, 1939, etc.

Certified May 24, 1939, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., June 21, 1939, etc.

(Decided February 25, 1946)

*Sharretts & Hillis (Edward P. Sharretts*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Bao,*Assistant Attorney General *(Samuel D. Spector,*special attorney), for the defendant.

Tilson, Judge:

The appeals listed in schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon a stipulation to the effect that the merchandise consists of rayon articles similar in all material respects to those which were the subject of decision in *United States*v. *Nippon Dry Goods Co.,*Reap. Dec. 5006; that the issue and the conditions as to market value are the same as the issue and conditions in the *Nippon*case; and that the appraised values of the rayon articles covered by these appeals, less any additions made by the importer by reason of the so-called Japanese consumption tax, to meet advances made by the appraiser in similar cases, represent the prices at the date of exportation at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country of exportation in usual wholesale quantities and in the Ordinary course of trade for exportation to the United .States, and that there were no higher foreign values.

Accepting this stipulation as a statement of fact, and following the cited authority, I find and hold the proper dutiable export values of the items of merchandise marked *“A”*and checked VCM on the invoices covered by said appeals to be the appraised values less any additions made by the importer by reason of the so-called Japanese consumption tax to meet advances made by the appraiser in similar cases. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
---

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, REGINALD SCHAUDER, the Vice President-Finance,
  Secretary and Treasurer of CANAL CAPITAL CORPORATION (the Company),
  DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:

| | 1. | The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
        the quarter ended July 31, 2010 (the Report), fully complies
        with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
        of 1934; and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                          
| | 2. | Information contained in the report fairly presents,
        in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation
        of the Company.                                                          

IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the undersigned has executed this
  statement this 30th day of October 2012.

/S/ Reginald Schauder 
  Reginald Schauder
  Vice President-Finance, 
  Secretary and Treasurer
  (Principal Financial and 
  Accounting Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
  906 has been provided to Canal Capital Corporation and will be retained by Canal
  Capital Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
  or its staff upon request.

The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities
  and Exchange Commission pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being
  filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
  amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company,
  whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation
  language in such filing.

---
|WELLS
    FARGO(logo) | Corporate
                                                       Trust Services
                                                       MAC R1204-010
                                                       9062 Old Annapolis Road
                                                       Columbia, MD 21045
                                                       Tel: 410 884 2000
                                                       Fax: 410 715 2380
|--------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



CCRE Commercial Mortgage Securities,
L.P.

110 E 59TH ST

NEW YORK, New York 10022-1304



|Re: |  | Annual
                                                                           Statement of Compliance for COMM 2015-CCRE27 Commercial
                                                                           Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates
|--- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Per the Pooling and Servicing
Agreement dated as of October 1, 2015 (the “Agreement”), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo
Bank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator (“Wells Fargo”), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year ending
December 31, 2016 (the “Reporting Period”):



(a) A
review of Wells Fargo’s activities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under the Agreement has been made
under such officer’s supervision; and



(b)To the best of
such officer’s knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in
all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.



February 27, 2017



|/s/
    BRIAN SMITH | 
|------------------- | 
|BRIAN
    SMITH     | 
|Vice
    President  | 



|Wells
    Fargo Bank, N.A. | Together
    we’ll go far
|-------------------------- | -------------------------
Grapevine Training Center 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Docket Operations M-30, 

West Bldg Ground Floor Room W12-140 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington,DC 20590 

SUBJECT REQUEST: 

".- 0 l.r:;-:-, 1

,,\ -~ '::'t t- . ...._; .J 

November 01, 2012 

REQUEST FOR RENEWAL OF FAA EXEMPTION NUMBER 9843B (AS AMENDED) REGULATORY 

DOCKET NUMBER: Faa-2008-0853, ALLOWING SINGLE PILOT OPERATIONS OF CESSNA 

CITATION AIRCRAFT. 

To Whom it may concern; 

PrestoSim Inc currently holds FAA exemption, number 9843B, Regulatory Docket number FAA 2008-

0853, from 14 cfr 91.531 (a)(1)(2); 91.9(a) allowing certificated pilots to conduct operations as a Single Pilot in 

Cessna Citation Aircraft. 

We are submitting this letter as written request to renew this itemized exemption for an additional two years, 

with the terms and conditions of the original petition remaining the same. 

PrestoSim submits that the basis of the original decision to grant the exemption has continued intact. Further 

more there have been no change in the conditions and or reasons relative to public safety and interest. 

I would also like to request a fax copy of the approval and then the original be mailed to our office address. 

~/~ Greg P Dawsey 

Training Center Manager 

1000 Nolen Dr. Ste 400,Grapevine, Texas 76051. (800) 393-1075 I Fax (817) 488-4352
### Northern Everglades, Florida, satellite image map

By: Jean-Claude ThomasJohn Jones**

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/i2756

#### Links

- More information:  **Publisher Index Page**                            (html)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

#### Study Area
<PAGE>   1
                                                                  EXHIBIT 4.1.1

                                AMENDMENT TO THE
                                  H.T.E., INC.
              1997 EMPLOYEE INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN, AS AMENDED

        THIS AMENDMENT, made as of this 4th day of February, 2000 by H.T.E.,
INC. (hereinafter called the "Employer");

                              W I T N E S S E T H:

        WHEREAS, the Employer did establish the H.T.E., Inc. 1997 Employee
Incentive Compensation Plan, as amended (the "Plan") for the purpose of
providing an additional incentive to its officers and employees in recognition
of their contributions to the Employer's progress; and

        WHEREAS, the Employer reserved the right to amend the Plan;

        NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan shall be amended as follows, effective as of
February 4, 2000:

        1. A new Section 2.(ff) replaces the former Section 2.(ff) and is hereby
           added to the Plan to read as follows:

           "(ff) "Stock" means the Company's Common Stock, and such other
        securities as may be substituted for (or resubstituted) for Stock
        pursuant to Section 10(c) hereof, and/or any common stock of any
        Subsidiary."

        2. In all other respects, the Plan shall remain unchanged by this
           Amendment.

        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Employer has caused this instrument to be
executed the day and year first above written.

                                      H.T.E., INC.

                                      By: /s/ O. F. Ramos
                                          -----------------------------------
                                          O. F. Ramos
                                          President & Chief Executive Officer
Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA- 2011-0219 Directorate Identifier: 2010-NM-228 -AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed cell

.

Estimated Costs: Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, propeller, appliance) Action (e.g., Inspection,

replacement) Work-hours (include access, testing, and close-up) Labor

cost (@$85/h

our) Parts Cost Total Costs (labor +

parts) Number of

U.S. Registered

Products Total Cost

for U.S. Fleet



### Remove and install door latch fittings

and witness mark placards 7 $ 595.00 

### $1365.00 $1,960.00 

### 451 $883,960.00

The known number of products in compliance: Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $883,960 Costs covered under warranty ( if known )

Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table
that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs) :

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES* NO

*Explanation:DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES* NO

*Explanation:

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a s ubstantial number of small entities? Explain for

either a Yes or No answer.

YES NO

Explanation:

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES* NO



### * Explanation 

### :
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Coast Guard 

          - 33 CFR Part 165 
          - [CGD13-07-015] 
          - RIN 1625-AA00 

# AGENCY:

Coast Guard, DHS. 

# ACTION:

Notice of enforcement of Rose Festival Security Zone.

# SUMMARY:

The Captain of the Port Portland, Oregon will begin enforcing the Portland Rose Festival Security Zone from June 6th, 2007 until June 11, 2007. This zone provides for the security of public vessels on a portion of the Willamette River during the fleet week of the 2007 Rose Festival. 

# DATES:

This notice of enforcement for 33 CFR 165.1312 will be enforced from 12:01 a.m., June 6, 2007 until 11:59 p.m., June 11, 2007. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Petty Officer Michelle Duty , c/o Captain of the Port Portland, OR, 6767 North Basin Avenue, Portland, OR 97217 at (503) 240-9301 to obtain information concerning enforcement of this rule. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    On May 29, 2003, the Coast Guard published a final rule (68 FR 31979 as amended by 70 FR 33352 published on June 8, 2005) establishing a security zone, in 33 CFR 165.1312, for the security of public                           ( print page 25967)                        vessels on a portion of the Willamette River during the fleet week of the Rose Festival. This security zone provides for the regulation of vessel traffic in the vicinity of the moored vessels. Entry into this zone is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the Port or his designee. The Captain of the Port Portland will begin enforcing the Rose Festival Security Zone established by 33 CFR 165.1312 on June 6, 2007. The Captain of the Port may be assisted by other Federal, State, or local agencies in enforcing this security zone. This security zone will be enforced until June 11, 2007.                 

Dated: April 20, 2007. 

Patrick G. Gerrity, 

Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, Portland. 

[FR Doc. E7-8725 Filed 5-7-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910-15-P