alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### L. Bamberger & Co. *v.*United States

No. 7433.

Invoice dated London, England, September 1944.

Certified September 1944.

Entered at Newark, N. J., October 18, 1944.

Entry No. 323.

(Amended decision [Reap. Dec. 7420] November 12, 1947)

*303*Strauss & Hedges (Hadley S. King*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

- *Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Tilson, Judge:

This appeal was originally submitted upon the following stipulation:

> It is hereby stipulated and agreed, subject to the approval of the Court, that the merchandise covered by the above entitled appeal for reappraisement was imported from Great Britain; that the issues involved in this appeal for reappraisement are the same in all material respects as the issues decided in United States v. Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp., Suit No. 4513, C. A. D. 334, and that the record in said case may be incorporated herein.'

> It is further stipulated and agreed that the entered value of the merchandise in the above entitled appeal for reappraisement is equal to the price, at the time of exportation of such merchandise to the United States, at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, and that the foreign value of such or similar merchandise is no higher.

Based upon this stipulation, and particularly the first paragraph thereof, I treated this case as a regular British purchase tax appeal and rendered judgment holding the proper dutiable values to be the values found by the appraiser, less any amount added to cover the so-called British purchase tax. Upon further investigation of the record I now find that this is not a regular British purchase tax case at all and that no amount was added by anyone to cover a so-called British purchase tax, but that the appraiser simply made a straight advance over the entered values of 33)4 per centum.

The case still being within the breast of the court, I hereby rewrite my original decision, promulgated on October 27, 1947, and hold the entered values of the merchandise covered by this appeal to be the proper dutiable export values. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
# C_2016059EN.01002001.xml

| 15.2.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 59/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.2.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 59/20

---

Order of the President of the General Court of 17 December 2015 — Lysoform Dr. Hans Rosemann and Others v ECHA

(Case T-669/15 R)

((Application for interim measures - REACH - Making available on the market and use of biocidal products - Inclusion of a company as a supplier of an active substance on the list referred to in Article 95 of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 - Application for suspension of operation - Lack of urgency))

(2016/C 059/22)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Lysoform Dr. Hans Rosemann GmbH (Berlin, Germany); Ecolab Deutschland GmbH (Monheim am Rhein, Germany); Schülke & Mayr GmbH (Norderstedt, Germany); and Diversey Europe Operations BV (Utrecht, Netherlands) (represented by: K. Van Maldegem, M. Grunchard, lawyers, and P. Sellar, Advocate)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) (represented by: C. Buchanan and W. Broere, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for suspension of operation of the decision of ECHA of 16 July 2015 to include company B. as a supplier of an active substance on the list referred to in Article 95(1) of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2012 concerning the making available on the market and use of biocidal products (OJ 2012 L 167, p. 1).

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim measures is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim measures is dismissed.

| 2. | Costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Costs are reserved.

---
#### F. W. Woolworth Co. *v.*United States

No. 8050.

Entered at Baltimore, Md.

Entry No. 2055.

(Decided September 17, 1951)

*Sharretts, Hillis & Paley (Howard C. Carter*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*David N. Edelstein,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

JohnsoN, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between counsel for the plaintiffs and the Assistant Attorney General for the United States, that the market value or the price, at the time of exportation to the United States of the earthenware articles covered by the Appeals to reappraisement enumerated on schedule “A” hereto attached and made part hereof, at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantity and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, plus the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed, ready for shipment to the United States, was the entered value and that there is no higher foreign value.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED, that these appeals to reappraisement be submitted on this stipulation.

On tbe agreed facts I find tbe export value, as tbat value is defined in section 402 (d) of tbe Tariff Act of 1930, to be tbe proper basis for tbe determination of tbe value of tbe earthenware articles bere involved, and tbat sucb value was tbe entered value.

Insofar as tbe appeal relates to all other merchandise it is hereby, dismissed.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 23.1


             INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM'S CONSENT
             -------------------------------------------------------


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements of
Brilliant Technologies Corporation and Subsidiaries (formerly Advanced
Technology Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries) (the "Company") on Form S-8, File
No. 333-123045 filed on February 28, 2005 and File No. 333-117380 filed on July
15, 2004, of our report, which includes an explanatory paragraph as to the
Company's ability to continue as a going concern, dated May 24, 2006, on our
audits of the consolidated financial statements of Brilliant Technologies
Corporation and Subsidiaries (formerly Advanced Technology Industries, Inc. and
Subsidiaries) as of December 31, 2005 and for the years ended December 31, 2005
and 2004 and for the period from inception (October 1, 1999) to December 31,
2005, which report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB.


                                             /S/ MARCUM & KLIEGMAN LLP

New York, New York
May 24, 2006
Exhibit
      13.2




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Annual Report of Fundtech Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F
      for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Yoram Bibring, Chief Financial
      Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted
      pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:
      April 11, 2008




/s/
                Yoram BibringName:
                Yoram BibringTitle:
                Chief Financial Officer(Principal
                Financial Officer)




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Fundtech Ltd. and will be retained by Fundtech Ltd. and furnished to the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT KEITH R . B R IDGEWATER , Plaintiff - Appe lla nt, v. SW E ENY, LVN, De fe nda

nt - Appe lle e . No. 14-15782 D.C . No. 2:11-c v-01216-TLNC M K M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Ea ste rn Distric t of C a lifornia Troy L. Nunle y , Distric t Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d

June 22, 2015 ** B e fore : HAW K INS, GR AB ER , a nd W . FLETC H ER , C irc uit Judge s . Ke ith R . B ridge wate r, a C a lifornia sta te prisone r, a

ppe a ls pro se from

the distric t c o urt’ s sum

m ary judgm e nt in his 42 U.S.C . § 1983 a c t ion a lle g ing re ta lia tion. W e h a

ve jurisdic tion unde r 28 U.S.C . § 1291. W e re vie w de novo, Brodhe im v . C

ry , 584 F.3d 1262, 1267 (9th C ir. 2009), a nd we a ffirm . 

# F IL ED

JUL 02 2015 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).The distric t c ourt prope rly grante d sum

m a ry judgm e nt be c a

use B ridge wate r fa ile d to ra ise a

ge nuine disputeof m ate ria l fa c t a s to whe the r de fe nda nt took a n a dve rse a c t ion a g a inst B ridge wate r in re sponse to his prote c te d c onduc t. Se e id . at 1269-71 (se tting forth e le m e nts of a re ta lia t ion c la im in the prison c onte x t, a nd noting tha

t “ a pla intiff m

ust show tha

t his prote c te d c onduc t wa s the substa ntia l or m otiva t ing fa c tor be hind thede fe nda nt’ s c onduc t” (c ita

tion a nd inte rna l quota

tion m arks om itte d)). W e do not c onside r argum e nts ra ise d for the first tim e on a ppe a l or m atte rs not spe c ific a lly

and distinc tly

ra ise d a nd a rgue d in theope n ing brie f. Se e Padge tt v . W right , 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th C ir. 2009) (pe r c uriam ). De fe nda nt’ s m o tion to strike , file d on Ja nua ry 23, 2015, is denie d . AFFIRM E D.

1 4 - 1 5 7 8 2 2
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

February 12 , 2020 

# Order

Clerk Febr uary 12 , 2020

159676 ( 75 )

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

SC: 159676

v COA: 338418

Macomb CC: 2015

- 001559

- FC

CURTIS LEE HAMPTON,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_______________________________________ __ /

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of defendant

- appell ant to extend the time

for filing his supplemental brief is GRANTED. The supplemental brief will be accepted

as timely filed if submitted on or before March 16 , 2020

.
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 193 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 25, 2007 

Received and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Recognizing all hunters across the United States for their 

continued commitment to safety. 

Whereas in 2006 there were over 16,000,000 hunters in the 

United States of which only .0013 percent incurred an 

injury during the past hunting season; 

Whereas in 2006 this injury rate was lower than many other 

forms of recreation; 


hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS
2 

HCON 193 RFS 

Whereas there are 70,000 hunter education instructors teaching hunter safety, ethics, and conservation to approximately 750,000 students successfully each year; 

Whereas State fish and game agencies began offering hunter 

safety programs in 1949, and since then, more than 

35,000,000 people have been certified; 

Whereas much of the success of hunter safety can be contributed to hunter education training and the role of responsible hunters in the field; 

Whereas Congress commends Pennsylvania hunters for setting a new State safety record in 2006; 

Whereas hunters continue year after year to improve their 

safety record; and 

Whereas hunters are the vital link in preserving and maintaining the great natural resources in the United States, 

including wild places: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That the Congress— 

3 (1) recognizes all hunters across the United 

4 States for their continued commitment to safety; 

5 and 

6 (2) directs the Secretary of the Senate to trans7 mit a copy of this resolution to the Pennsylvania 


hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS
3 

HCON 193 RFS 

1 State Game Commissioner and the Director of the 

2 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 24, 

2007. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 


hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS
Exhibit 11.1   


                                   COMPETITIVE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
                          Schedule of Computation of Earnings Per Share
                                        (Unaudited)


                                   Nine months               Quarter
                                 ended April 30,          ended April 30,     
                                            
                               1998        1997          1998         1997   

Net loss applicable
  to common stock          $  (889,269)  $(1,170,359)  $ (387,990)  $ (398,463)

Common and common
  equivalent shares -
    diluted:
  Basic weighted average
    common shares
    outstanding              5,965,357     5,910,907    5,977,433    5,921,172
  Adjustments for assumed
    exercise of stock
    options                     38,948*       63,583*      41,725*      55,918*
  Adjustments for assumed
    exercise of stock
    warrants                     4,582*       18,472*       3,659*       9,138*
  Weighted average number
    of common and common
    equivalent shares
    outstanding              6,008,887     5,992,962    6,022,817    5,986,228

Net loss per share of
    common stock:
    Basic and diluted      $     (0.15)  $     (0.20)  $    (0.06)  $    (0.07)


* Anti-dilutive.

These calculations are submitted in accordance with Regulation S-K
item 601 (b) (11) which differs from the requirements of paragraph 13
of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 128 because they
produce an anti-dilutive result.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 April 26, 2019

Order 

Clerk

April 26, 2019

157210(83)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

SC: 157210

v COA: 322820

Livingston CC: 12-020831-FH

DENNIS KEITH TOWNE,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

By order of the Chief Justice, the motion of defendant-appellant to extend the time 

for filing his supplemental brief is GRANTED. The supplemental brief will be accepted 

as timely filed if submitted on or before June 7, 2019.
Exhibit 31.4

Certification of Principal Financial Officer

pursuant to

Exchange Act
Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a),

as adopted pursuant
to

Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Paul E. Ross, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of The Trade Desk, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2016; and
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |  |  |                              
|-------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------------
|Date: April 26, 2017 |  |  |  | /s/ Paul E. Ross             
|                     |  |  |  | Paul E. Ross                 
|                     |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer      
|                     |  |  |  | (Principal Financial Officer)
### Geology and ground waters of the western part of San Diego County, California

By: Arthur Jackson EllisC.H. Lee

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp446

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 6**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 15**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 19**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 22**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 25**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 30**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 32**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 35**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 36**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 39**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 41**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 42**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 44**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 46**                            (pdf) 
- NGMDB Index Pages:                               - **Geology and ground waters of the western part of San Diego County, California**                            (html)
  - **Geology**                            (html) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

No abstract available.

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
Exhibit 35.9



|     |  |                                                                                                          
|---- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|LOGO |  | Commercial Mortgage Servicing D1050-084,
8th Fl 401 South Tryon Street
Charlotte, NC 28202 1-800-326-1334

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of April 1, 2016, by and among CITIGROUP COMMERCIAL
MORTGAGE SECURITIES INC, as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, C-III ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC, as Special Servicer, PARK BRIDGE LENDER SERVICES LLC, as Operating Advisor and Asset Representations Reviewer, CITIBANK,
N.A., as Certificate Administrator and WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2016-P3 (the Agreement). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined
shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

Pursuant to Section 10.08 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice
President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from April 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016 (the Reporting Period), and of its performance per the Agreement during such period
has been made under my supervision, and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of
February 2017.



|                        
|------------------------
|LOGO                    
|Daniel Bober            
|Executive Vice President
|Wells Fargo Bank        



|                       |  |     
|---------------------- |  | ----
|Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |  | LOGO
No. 39091.

#### Protest 870474-G of Geo. D. Emery Co. (New York).

Opinion by

McClelland, P. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel it was found that the correct measurement of the balsa wood in question was 53,053 feet. The protest was sustained to that extent.
DISMISS and Opinion Filed December 15, 2021 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-21-00386-CV 

ALYAH KECK, Appellant 

V. 

ROBERT LESLIE, Appellee 

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. CC-20-02019-D 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Chief Justice Burns, Justice Goldstein, and Justice Smith 

Opinion by Chief Justice Burns 

Appellant’s brief in this case is overdue. By postcard dated November 9, 

2021, we notified appellant the time for filing her brief had expired. We directed 

appellant to file a brief and an extension motion within ten days. We cautioned 

appellant that failure to file her brief by that time might result in the dismissal of this 

appeal without further notice. To date, appellant has not filed a brief, filed an 

extension motion, nor otherwise corresponded with the Court regarding the status of 

this appeal. 

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1); 

42.3(b), (c). 
 –2– 

210386F.P05 

 

/Robert D. Burns, III/

ROBERT D. BURNS, III 

CHIEF JUSTICE 
 –3– 

S 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

ALYAH KECK, Appellant 

No. 05-21-00386-CV V. 

ROBERT LESLIE, Appellee 

 On Appeal from the County Court at 

Law No. 4, Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. CC-20-02019-

D. 

Opinion delivered by Chief Justice 

Burns. Justices Goldstein and Smith 

participating. 

 In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is 

DISMISSED. 

Judgment entered this 15th day of December 2021.