alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 387 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 387

 Expressing the sense of Congress that the United States should sever 
  diplomatic relations with Zimbabwe until such time as the President 
  determines that Zimbabwe meets requirements relating to democratic, 
 free and fair elections, basic civil liberties and human rights, and 
                      certain other requirements.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 26, 2008

   Mr. Tancredo (for himself and Mr. Chabot) submitted the following 
 concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing the sense of Congress that the United States should sever 
  diplomatic relations with Zimbabwe until such time as the President 
  determines that Zimbabwe meets requirements relating to democratic, 
 free and fair elections, basic civil liberties and human rights, and 
                      certain other requirements.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of Congress that the United States should sever 
diplomatic relations with Zimbabwe until such time as the President 
determines that--
            (1) Zimbabwe is governed at the national and local levels 
        by governments that are democratically elected from free and 
        fair elections conducted under the supervision of 
        internationally recognized observers and in which--
                    (A) opposition parties are permitted ample time to 
                organize and campaign for such elections; and
                    (B) all candidates are permitted access to the 
                media;
            (2) the Zimbabwean Government is showing respect for the 
        basic civil liberties and human rights of the citizens of 
        Zimbabwe;
            (3) Zimbabwe has adopted a market-oriented economic system 
        based on the right to own and enjoy property without regard to 
        race or political affiliation;
            (4) the Zimbabwean Government has put in place a mechanism 
        to ensure regular free and fair elections;
            (5) the Zimbabwean Government has established an 
        independent judiciary; and
            (6) Zimbabwe's current dictator, Robert Mugabe, is no 
        longer part of the Zimbabwean Government in any capacity.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of US LEC Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Aaron D. Cowell, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                                            
|--------------------------------------------
|/s/    AARON D. COWELL, JR.                 
|Aaron D. Cowell, Jr. Chief Executive Officer
|March 22, 2004
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-7432

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ANTOINE DEMETRIUS LUNDY, a/k/a Buff,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (2:12-cr-00106-RGD-DEM-3)

Submitted: May 20, 2021 Decided: May 24, 2021

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Antoine Demetrius Lundy, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Antoine Demetrius Lundy appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for 

compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A). We have reviewed the record and 

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. 

United States v. Lundy, No. 2:12-cr-00106-RGD-DEM-3 (E.D. Va. Sept. 15, 2020). We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF THE REGISTRANT INCLUDED IN ITS FIRST QUARTER REPORT TO
SHAREHOLDERS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-1-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                      25,446,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                              156,184,000
<ALLOWANCES>                               (2,222,000)
<INVENTORY>                                157,694,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           357,055,000
<PP&E>                                     143,261,000
<DEPRECIATION>                            (65,336,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             498,976,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      204,851,000
<BONDS>                                      9,559,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                   155,137,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 116,262,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               498,976,000
<SALES>                                    149,743,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           150,191,000
<CGS>                                       95,048,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              119,396,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             7,530,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             505,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             22,760,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 7,775,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         14,985,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                14,985,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    $0.23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    $0.23
        

</TABLE>
Attachment E Guidance on How to Request Small Business Fee Waivers See web cite at, Registration Service Fees, Guidance on How to Request Small Business Fee Waivers | Pesticides | US EPA
No. 65721.

#### United China & Glass Co. *v.*United States,

protests 60/7665-15659, etc. (New Orleans).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of decorative after-dinner cups and saucers the same in all material respects as those the subject of *United States*v. *The Baltimore & Ohio R.R. Co. a/c United China & Glass Company*(47 C.C.P.A. 1, C.A.D. 719), the merchandise was held dutiable as follows: (a) The items entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption prior to September 10, 1955, at 50 cents per dozen, but not less than 45 percent nor more than 70 percent ad valorem, under paragraph 212, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T.D. 51802), supplemented by Presidential proclamation (T.D. 51909), and (b) all items entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on and after September 10,1955, at 45 percent under said paragraph, as modified by the Japanese Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T.D. 53865), supplemented by Presidential proclamation (T.D. 53877).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                           DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                                SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                                          672,878
<SECURITIES>                                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                 2,095,484
<ALLOWANCES>                                                    172,036
<INVENTORY>                                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                              3,628,047
<PP&E>                                                       26,855,999
<DEPRECIATION>                                               11,068,636
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                               30,136,285
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                         7,077,940
<BONDS>                                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                                           0
<COMMON>                                                      2,128,655
<OTHER-SE>                                                   13,920,331
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                 30,136,285
<SALES>                                                      14,636,612
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                             14,636,612
<CGS>                                                        10,044,895
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                11,127,895
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                      0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                              497,064
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                  28,800
<INCOME-TAX>                                                    276,117
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                            (247,317)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                       0
<CHANGES>                                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                                   (247,317)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                     (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                     (0.01)
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 124 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 124

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. USE OF CAPITOL GROUNDS FOR NATIONAL PEACE OFFICERS' MEMORIAL 
              SERVICE.

    (a) In General.--The Grand Lodge of the Fraternal Order of Police 
and its auxiliary (in this resolution referred to as the ``sponsor'') 
shall be permitted to

              

 sponsor a public event, the 26th annual National Peace Officers' 
Memorial Service (in this resolution referred to as the ``event''), on 
the Capitol Grounds, in order to honor the law enforcement officers who 
died in the line of duty during 2006.
    (b) Date of Event.--The event shall be held on May 15, 2007, or on 
such other date as the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the 
Committee on Rules and Administration of the Senate jointly designate.

SEC. 2. TERMS AND CONDITIONS.

    (a) In General.--Under conditions to be prescribed by the Architect 
of the Capitol and the Capitol Police Board, the event shall be--
            (1) free of admission charge and open to the public; and
            (2) arranged not to interfere with the needs of Congress.
    (b) Expenses and Liabilities.--The sponsor shall assume full 
responsibility for all expenses and liabilities incident to all 
activities associated with the event.

SEC. 3. EVENT PREPARATIONS.

    Subject to the approval of the Architect of the Capitol, the 
sponsor is authorized to erect upon the Capitol Grounds such stage, 
sound amplification devices, and other related structures and 
equipment, as may be required for the event.

SEC. 4. ENFORCEMENT OF RESTRICTIONS.

    The Capitol Police Board shall provide for enforcement of the 
restrictions contained in section 5104(c) of title 40, United States 
Code, concerning sales, advertisements, displays, and solicitations on 
the Capitol Grounds, as well as other restrictions applicable to the 
Capitol Grounds, in connection with the event.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 7, 2007.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
110th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                            H. CON. RES. 124

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

   Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the National Peace 
                      Officers' Memorial Service.
```
Case No. 13,980.

#### THOMPSON v. WELLS et al.

[3 Cranch, C. C. 5.] 1

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

Dec., 1826.

Replevin — Reinstatement—Appearance.

If the defendant in replevin does not appear at the return term of the writ, the action is discontinued, and the court will not, at a subsequent term, reinstate it, upon affidavit that the defendant requested an attorney to enter an appearance for him, and supposed it had been done.

Replevin. The action was discontinued by the non-appearance of the defendants at the last term.

Mr. Key, for the defendants

[Wells and Nicholls], now moved to reinstate <t on the docket, upon affidavit of the defendant Wells that on the first day of the last term he requested Mr. Key to enter an appearance for him, and supposed it had been done.

Mr. Key afterwards withdrew his motion, being satisfied that the practice of this court was against him.
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-14-0001371 31-AUG-2016 03:22 PM
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION



I, David A. Veltri,
certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of U.S. Energy Corp.;
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





DATED this 8th day of December
2016.





/s/ David A. Veltri

David A. Veltri

Chief Executive Officer
No. 47617.

#### Protests 864813-G, etc., of Ampol, Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
# C_2016200EN.01002202.xml

| 6.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 200/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 200/22

---

Order of the General Court of 18 March 2016 — CBM v OHIM — ÏD Group (Fashion ID)

(Case T-536/15) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Withdrawal of the opposition - No need to adjudicate))

(2016/C 200/32)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: CBM Creative Brands Marken GmbH (Zurich, Switzerland) (represented by: U. Lüken and J. Bärenfänger, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: S. Hanne, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: ÏD Group (Roubaix, France)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 14 July 2015 (Case R 2472/2014-4), concerning opposition proceedings between ÏD Group and CBM Creative Brands Marken GmbH.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no need to adjudicate on the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no need to adjudicate on the action.

| 2. | CBM Creative Brands Marken GmbH is ordered to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM). |
| --- | --- |

2.

CBM Creative Brands Marken GmbH is ordered to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).

---

(1)  OJ C 371, 9.11.2015.

1

---
**BNP      U.S. FUNDING L.L.C.**

**COMPUTATION      OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES**

|                                              |   |   | **For                the Year Ended December 31, 2006**  |   |
|---------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Net                income                         |   | $      | 57,603                                                        |   |
| Fixed                charges:                     |   |   |                                                          |   |
| Audit                fees                         |   |   | 46                                                            |   |
| Trustee                fees                       |   |   | 130                                                           |   |
| Administrative                and consulting fees |   |   | 281                                                           |   |
| Total                fixed charges                |   |   | 457                                                           |   |
| Earnings                before fixed charges      |   | $      | 58,060                                                        |   |
| Fixed                charges, as above            |   |   | 457                                                           |   |
| Ratio                of earnings to fixed charges |   |   | 127.05                                                        |   |

----
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:**Medicalaspects of biological warfare
 
pdf |mobi | epub|
 
SuDoc Number:D104.35:B 52/2018
Item Number:0352-F (online)
CGP systemNumber:001082526
January 30, 2019
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 357 

Encouraging all States to enact laws requiring photo identification to vote 

in elections. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 20, 2008 

Mr. FEENEY submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred 

to the Committee on House Administration 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Encouraging all States to enact laws requiring photo 

identification to vote in elections. 

Whereas on April 28, 2008, the Supreme Court of the United 

States, in Crawford et al. v. Marion County Election 

Board et al., ruled that the State of Indiana’s law requiring voters to present photo identification when voting is 

constitutional; 

Whereas the Court, in a 6–3 ruling written by Justices Stevens, Roberts, and Kennedy, found that the burden on 

voters to present photo ID is offset by the benefit to voters and overall electoral integrity of reducing the risk of 

fraud; 

Whereas the Crawford ruling noted that, ‘‘There is no question about the legitimacy or importance of a State’s interest in counting only eligible voters’ votes.’’; 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•HCON 357 IH 

Whereas the Crawford ruling also noted that, ‘‘Indiana’s interest in protecting public confidence in elections, while 

closely related to its interest in preventing voter fraud, 

has independent significance, because such confidence encourages citizen participation in the democratic process.’’; 

Whereas the Crawford ruling also noted that, ‘‘The relevant 

burdens here are those imposed on eligible voters who 

lack photo identification cards . . . . Because Indiana’s 

cards are free, the inconvenience of going to the Bureau 

of Motor Vehicles, gathering required documents, and 

posing for a photograph does not qualify as a substantial 

burden on most voters’ right to vote, or represent a significant increase over the usual burdens of voting.’’; 

Whereas a Rasmussen Reports telephone survey of likely voters in early 2008 found that 80 percent of voters believe 

that everyone should be required to show photo identification to vote, that 13 percent disagree with the photo 

ID requirement, and that 72 percent disagree that requiring photo ID unfairly discriminates against some segments of the population; and 

Whereas State requirements regarding what, if any, identification they require voters to present vary greatly: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That Congress— 

3 (1) strongly encourages all States that have not 

4 already done so, in light of the recent ruling by the 

5 Supreme Court of the United States in Crawford et 

6 al. v. Marion County Election Board et al., to swiftly 

7 enact laws requiring voters to present current, valid, 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
3 

•HCON 357 IH 

1 government-issued photo identification based on 

2 proof of United States citizenship in order to vote in 

3 elections; and 

4 (2) applauds those States that have already im5 plemented vigorous photo identification laws to se6 cure the integrity of the democratic process. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

KEITH RENARD LONG, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D19-4793

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed September 30, 2020.

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 

9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for 

Pinellas County; Philip J. Federico, 

Judge.

Keith Renard Long, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

NORTHCUTT, LUCAS and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.