alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 45206.

#### Protests 769204-G, etc., of Calvaire, Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of atomizers in chief value of decorated glass similar to those the subject of Abstract 44140. The claim at 60 percent under paragraph 218 (f) was therefore sustained.
(Reap. Dec. 9019)

Entry No. 8234.

#### Fred Adler Co., Inc. v. United States

(Decided November 8, 1957)

Plaintiff not represented by counsel.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliyeb, Chief Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement is limited to the merchandise, identified on the invoice covering the shipment in question as German herring in aspic in 8-ounce jars and German conger eel in aspic in 8-ounce jars, which was exported from Germany and entered at the port of Chicago, Ill.

Stipulated facts, upon which the case was submitted, establish that the proper basis for appraisement of the merchandise in question, as hereinabove identified, is export value, as defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, and that such statutory value for each of the items is the unit values, as invoiced, net, packed, and I so hold.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
No. 47580.

#### Protest 894162-G of American Import Co.

Plaintiff’s application for rehearing denied. .
No. 43124.

#### Protests 851078-G, etc., of M. Zwiebel (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel squawker balloons similar to those the subject of Abstract 40493 were held dutiable at 45 percent under paragraph 409. Tin kazoos were held dutiable at 45 percent under paragraph 397 on the authority of Abstract 32264. Harmonicas similar to those the subject of Abstract 40586 were held dutiable at 40 percent under paragraph 1541.
### Go

Home National International Regional Industry Interactive Data About BEA FAQs Contact Us



## National Data National Data Industry Data
International Data Regional Data 

### GDP & Personal Income Fixed Assets GDP-by-industry Input-Output Int'l Transactions, Services, & IIP Direct Investment & MNEs GDP & Personal Income Sign In Register Help


### GDP & Personal Income BEA’s national economic accounts provide a comprehensive picture of the U.S. economy and feature many macroeconomic statistics. 

## Begin using the data... Citing BEA Information 

### ...includes: Gross domestic product (GDP) Gross domestic income (GDI) National income Corporate profits Government receipts and expenditures Personal income and disposable personal income Personal consumption expenditures (PCE), or consume r spending Personal saving 

### Additional information NIPA source data and methodologies Supplemental Estimates Guide to the Numbering of the NIPA Tables (PDF) SCB, August 2003 Access Underlying Detail tables Million Dollar NIPA tables 

### U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) http://www.bea.gov/iTable/index_nipa.cfm

1 of 2 8/31/2015 8:01 AM

### Contact Us Frequently Asked Questions About BEA Policies Privacy Policy Accessibility Information Quality Guidelines Data Dissemination Practices Open Data ESR System USA.gov COMMERCE.gov U.S. Economic Accounts National International Regional Industry News U.S. Economy at a Glance Current Releases News Release Archive
Information For... Media Congressional Users eFile Users Job Seekers
Publications Survey of Current Business Papers by Topic BEA Customer Guide Resources Interactive Data Research at BEA FAQs
More Director's Page Conferences Select NIPA Tables (PDF)


### Updates U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) http://www.bea.gov/iTable/index_nipa.cfm

2 of 2 8/31/2015 8:01 AM
(Reap. Dec. 8377)

Entry No. 655.

#### Wm. Filene’s Sons Co. *v.*United States

(Decided January 5, 1955)

*Barnes, Richardson & Colburn*for the plaintiff.

*Warren E. Burger,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Mollison, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> *432IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, subject to the approval of the Court, that the issues in the above-entitled appeal for reappraisement are the same in all material respects as the issues decided in *C. J. Tower & Sons*v. *United States,*R. D. 7624, and that the record in said case may be incorporated herein.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the appraised value of the merchandise involved in the instant case, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases, is equal to the price, at the time of exportation of such merchandise to the United States, at which such or similar merchandise is freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, and that the foreign value of such or similar merchandise is no higher.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that this case may be submitted on the foregoing stipulation.

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such value was the appraised value, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

   NUMBER                                                             SHARES

                                                            CUSIP NO. 448954 107

                            HYPERDYNAMICS CORPORATION

          50,000,000 AUTHORIZED SHARES  $.01 PAR VALUE  NON-ASSESSABLE

This  Certifies  that                                                    is  the
registered  holder  of                                                    Shares

                            HYPERDYNAMICS CORPORATION
transferable only on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof in person
or  by  Attorney  upon  surrender  of  this  Certificate  properly  endorsed.

     In  Witness Whereof, the said Corporation has caused this Certificate to be
signed  by  its  duly  authorized officers and its Corporate Seal to be hereunto
affixed.

                   This            day  of                      A.D.  19


     SECRETARY              HYPERDYNAMICS CORPORATION          PRESIDENT
                                    CORPORATE

                                      Seal
                                    DELAWARE


<PAGE>
Exhibit 35.1

Servicer Compliance Statement of AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.

This Annual Statement as to Compliance is delivered to you pursuant to Section 2.9 (c) of the 2016-2 Servicing Supplement dated as of March 31,
2016 (the Agreement) and Item 1123 of Regulation AB, executed in connection with the formation of GM Financial Automobile Leasing Trust 2016-2 (the Trust), the issuance of the Notes by the Trust and the closing of the
transactions and the execution and delivery of the various documents by AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. (the Servicer) and GMF Leasing LLC in connection therewith. The capitalized terms used herein shall have the same meanings as in
the Agreement.

The undersigned certifies that I am the Executive Vice President, Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer of the
Servicer. I further certify as follows:



| | 1. | I have conducted, or caused to be conducted under my supervision, a review of the Servicer during the preceding period from March 31, 2016 through December 31, 2016, and its performance under the Agreement.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, following such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such period, and, to the best of my knowledge, there has been no default in the
fulfillment of any such obligation.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.



|    |  |                                         |  |  |  |                      
|--- |  | --------------------------------------- |  |  |  | ---------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Connie Coffey                       |  |  |  | Dated: March 15, 2017
|    |  | Connie Coffey                           |  |  |  |                      
|    |  | Executive Vice President, Corporate     |  |  |  |                      
|    |  | Controller and Chief Accounting Officer |  |  |  |
No. 50694.

#### Protests 23412-K, etc., of Pistorino & Co., Inc., et al. (Boston).

Opinion by

Keepe, J.

At the trial it was established that the cacicavallo or caciocavallo cheese contained an inedible covering similar in all material respects to the covering at issue in Abstract 41794. It was further established that the pepato or sheep’s cheese, the calcagno or sheep’s cheese, the calcagno pecorino, and pecorino cheese were all Sicilian cheese and that such varieties of cheese contained coverings similar to the coverings of the cheese in Abstract 42146. In view of the evidence and following the decisions cited, it was held that the various kinds of cheese in question are properly dutiable upon the basis of the net weight returned by the United States appraiser, less *2y2*percent for tare of non-edible coverings. The protests were sustained to this extent.
### Regulatory Evaluation

## ·Iat~- 

# ( c**-o4 J.~** **VJ** Docket No. 

### FAA- Directorate Identifier: - AD



### .{[you make changes to the values in the table below. you must ensure the total s updat e accordingly

. 

## lf they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed ce ll.
Estimated Costs: Action Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, (e.g., Inspection, propeiJer, appliance)

replacement) Work-hours Labor Parts Cost Total Costs Number of Total Cost Do not include on- (include cost (labor+ 

# u.s. for U.S. Fleet condition costs here access, testing, (@$85/h parts) Registered and close-up) our) Products 

### Inspection 4.0

,. : • { 0**~** ( l •: .' lu.OO 

### 124 • .,. IH).IJ() .;. 0_!)(, 

### .: {I {!{J (J"; n '· 11.01 

# .. { •**~lj** () ll(l I <; 

### 0 0{ 

### ' OJJO 11 

### no t. O.f;t, 0.00 ' ( '10 I 

# '**O.i.~O ~**  0.00 {)(H) ' .;; {I L<' \ '!

.00 !'{I t ) 

# " 0 C',} \ 1.(1(1 ('.00 

## • (;,i;f• CdJG 

### Ill':· ' 

# 'I {)f**'~ On**  I' (){j <;. 

### r 111 J,!l(i r (lll

. .

r, (•.{ 'fl 

### ' 

## no i II •I ( 1 

## r**~·o** 

# ' I t' 

### ' (' I' fit )1 ( ' l.C I 

### i- ll ll

.I 11**[)~i** 1 (II ' fJ I •.fJ(' 

### r; ll

. fJ! I .fill •' '1!1 .:; 00 1 1 ' I) 110 !, lit, <;. 0 Oil ll (I( I II( The known number ofproducts 

### in compliance: Total Costs ofcompliance for 

### U.S. fleet: $42,160 Costs covered under warranty (if known) $
On-Condition Costs: Action Work-hours Labor cost Parts Cost Cost per Product (e.g., Inspection, (include access, (@$85/hour) testing, and close- replacement) up) 

### Replacement 16.0 

## s 1.:.:**.~n** PO $500**~** Xr 1)1) 

## s [I.{Jf .} II OJI 

## s I) Ill**~** (11 S (i IH :. I (.II) 

### Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs): 

### A fitting cost of $500 is assumed for the analysis.

### Executive Order 12866: Could the AD be considered a "significant regulatory action"? 

# Q YES*0**NO~** 

### *Explanation: 

### DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures: Is the AD signjficant? 

# G YES*O**NO~** 

### *Explanation: 

### Regulatory Flexibility Act: Will the AD have a signillcant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for either a Yes or No answer. 

# G YESD**NO~** 

### E xplanation: This 

### AD only affects 1 24 total US registered gliders. 

### Intrastate Aviation in Alaska: This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. I s it appropriate to include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode oftransportation? 

# 0
YES*0**NO~** 

### *Explanation:
##### 



1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Hastings Entertainment, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and(c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
 Date: April 20, 2007
    /s/ John H. MarmadukeJohn H. MarmadukePresident and Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)
No. 54282.

#### John W. Eshelman & Sons *v.*United States,

protest 110415-K (Cleveland).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as that passed upon in *Tower & Sons*v. *United States*(14 Cust. Ct. 94, C. D. 919) the claim for free entry was sustained.
No. 55503.

#### Macdonald & Maltby et al. *v.*United States,

protests 151030-K, etc. (Boston).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
(Reap. Dec. 9839)

#### Cosmic Radio Corp. Globe Shipping Co., Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 470924.

(Decided November 9, 1960)

Plaintiffs not represented by counsel.

*George GooKran Doiib,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Laweence, Judge:

There was no appearance on behalf of plain-, tiffs when the above-enumerated appeal for a reappraisement was called for hearing. The court thereupon ordered the case submitted.

It is provided by the rules of the court that in such an instance, after the opposite party has had an opportunity to present evidence on the issues, the case may be decided by the court on the record before it.

Accordingly, I have examined the record in the present appeal for a reappraisement and find nothing therein which tends in any way to overcome the presumption of correctness which attaches to the decision of the appraiser. I find and hold, therefore, that the proper value of the merchandise is the value returned by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
<PAGE>

                                                           EXHIBIT 10.2


                                PROMISSORY NOTE


$500,000.00                                                       August 7, 2000


    FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned promises to pay to the order of
HydroMaid International, Inc. the principal sum of FIVE HUNDRED THOUSAND AND
NO/100 DOLLARS ($500,000.00) together with an annual fee in the amount of
SIXTY THOUSAND AND NO/100 DOLLARS ($60,000.00), paid monthly in the amount of
FIVE THOUSAND AND NO/100 DOLLARS ($5,000) representing an annualized yield of
12%.

    Said principal sums and fees as due, shall be payable at 12226 South 1000
East, Suite 10, Draper, Utah 84020, or at such place as the holder hereof may
designate in writing. Furthermore, said principal and any remaining fees
outstanding shall be due and payable on or before twelve months from date
above. If full payment is not so paid, the maker jointly and severally
promises to pay such sums as the court may adjudge reasonable as attorney
fees in any suit or action required to collect this note.

    All parties to this note, including guarantors, sureties and endorsers,
hereby severally waive presentment, protest and notice of nonpayment, or any
release or discharge arising from any extension of time, or from any other
cause, at or after maturity thereof.


Southeastern Rain Fresh, Inc.

/s/ James L. Griggs
------------------------
By: James L. Griggs
    President & CEO
|WELLS FARGO(logo) | Commercial
Mortgage ServicingD1050-084, 8th Fl401 South Tryon StreetCharlotte,
NC 282021-800-326-1334
|----------------- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE



Reference is hereby made to that
certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of November 1, 2016, by and among CCRE COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES, L.P.,
as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, RIALTO
CAPITAL ADVISORS, LLC, as Special Servicer, AEGON USA REALTY ADVISORS, LLC, as Potomac Mills Special Servicer, WILMINGTON TRUST,
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator, Paying Agent and Custodian,
PARK BRIDGE LENDER SERVICES LLC, as Operating Advisor and Asset Representations Reviewer with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through
Certificates, CFCRE 2016-C6 (the “Agreement”). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the
meanings assigned in the Agreement.



Pursuant to Section 10.11 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage
Services do hereby certify that:



|1. |  | A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from November 1,
2016 through December 31, 2016 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance per the Agreement during such period
has been made under my supervision, and
|-- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  
|2. |  | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations
under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.                                                        



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of
the 28th day of February 2017.



|/s/ Daniel Bober         | 
|------------------------ | 
|Daniel Bober             | 
|Executive Vice President | 
|Wells Fargo Bank         | 



|Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | Together we’ll go far
|---------------------- | ---------------------
(Reap. Dec. 8864)

#### M. Pressner & Co. *v.*United States

Entry Nos. 92859 #1; 92859 #2.

(Decided June 20, 1957)

*Siegel, Mandell & Davidson*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Johnson, Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement have been submitted for decision upon tbe following stipulation of counsel for tbe parties hereto:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, subject to the approval of the Court, that the issues in the Appeals to Reappraisement noted above are the same in all material respects as the issues decided in *United States*v. *William Shaland,*A. R. D. 12, and that the record in said case may be incorporated herein.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the appraised value of the merchandise covered by the invoices embraced in the entries in these re-appraisements, less the item for local freight, is equal to the price at the time of exportation of such merchandise to the United States at which such or similar merchandise is freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, and that the foreign value of such or similar merchandise is no higher.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that these cases may be submitted on the foregoing stipulation.

On tbe agreed facts I find tbe export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of tbe Tariff Act of 1930, to be tbe proper basis for tbe determination of tbe value of tbe merchandise bere involved, and that sucb value was in each instance tbe appraised value, less tbe item for local freight.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
Filename IdentifierDate Systems System 1 System 2 System 1 System 2 System 3 System 4 System 5 System 1 System 2 System 3 System 4 System 5 System 1 System 2 System 3 System 4 System 1 System 2 System 3 System 4 King County 300 acre site 3 Jan 2008 PLC data.xls Site 3 Jan-08 System 1 Site 3 King County 300 Acre site 3 December 2007 PLC data.xls Dec-07 Site 2 King County 300 Acre Site 2 Dec 2007 data.xls

King County 300 acre site 2 Jan 2008 PLC data.xls Site 2 Jan-07

Dec-07 King County 300 Acre Site 1 Data Dec-2007.xls Site 1 Dec-07

King County 300 acre sie 1 Jan 2008 data.xls Site 1 Jan-08Corresponding Pond

M Pond South Pond

South Pond M Pond

CDG Ponds

CDG Ponds