alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration 

          - [TA-W-61,188] 

      ( print page 24616)    
Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on March 27, 2007 in response to a worker petition filed by a state agency representative on behalf of workers of Randstad, working on-site at Merrill Lynch, Equity Research, New York, New York. 

The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated. 

Signed at Washington, DC, this 23rd day of April 2007. 

Linda G. Poole, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. E7-8463 Filed 5-2-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7555

TERELL MOORE,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

GENE M. JOHNSON,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, District 

Judge. (7:08-cv-00526-gec-mfu)

Submitted: March 30, 2010 Decided: April 2, 2010

Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Terell Moore, Appellant Pro Se. Joanne Virginia Frye, OFFICE OF 

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Terell Moore seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. 

The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge 

issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). A 

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that 

reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the 

constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or 

wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district 

court is likewise debatable. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 

U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 

(2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We 

have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Moore 

has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny 

Moore’s motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss 

the appeal. We further deny Moore’s motion for the appointment 

of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process. 

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

        <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This Schedule Contains Summary Financial Information Extracted From The
Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements As Of June 30, 1997 And For
The Six Months Then Ended And Is Qualified In Its Entirety By Reference
To Such Financial Statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          22,581
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  132,875
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    732,892
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,029,071
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        373,851
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              116
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     391,420
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,029,071
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               656,574
<CGS>                                          531,221
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  605,516
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              17,445
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 33,613
<INCOME-TAX>                                    12,437
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             21,176
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    21,176
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.75
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.56
        

        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 99.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

           PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

                   (SUBSECTIONS (A) AND (B) OF SECTION 1350,
                  CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), the
undersigned officer of SonomaWest Holdings, Inc., a California corporation (the
"Company"), does hereby certify that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2002 (the
"Form 10-Q") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                              Dated: November 14, 2002


                                              /s/ Roger S. Mertz
                                              ------------------------
                                              Roger S. Mertz
                                              Chairman of the Board
Map 2
Proposed Plan Stipulations

Rio Blanco Co. j Roan Plateau Proposed Plan/Final EIS
August 2006

Garfield Co. Lane
[] Roan Plateau Planning Area

(AS) Private Surface Federal Subsurface
BLM Oustide Planning Area
Standard Restrictions and Limitations
Private Surface Subsurface

WDE Site Specific Relocation (SSRICSU)
HEE No Groand Distrurbance (NGDINSO)

Scale 1:150,000
Bureau of Land Managmenrt

RW y RSW Glenwood Springs Field Office

UlProjects Roan _Pletupdate_November_2005imapsioropsed_stipulatons md
No. 46381.

#### Protests 921619-G, etc., of Guth Stern & Co., Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of atomizers and atomizers contained in toilet sets and that said atomizers are similar in all material respects to those passed upon in Abstract 44140. In *278accordance therewith the claim at 60 percent under paragraph 218 (f) was sustained.
North Springfield Sustainable Energy Project, LLC #AP-11-038
Based on the Agency's review ofthe Facility's application and the above Findings of Fact, the Agency concludes that the Facility, subject to the following Permit conditions, complies with all applicable state and federal air pollution control laws. Therefore, pursuantto 10 

### VSA §§556, as amended, the Agency hereby issues a Permit approving the Facility, as described in the above FindingsofFact, subjecttothefollowing:



### PERMITCONDITIONS

- Construction and EquipmentSpecifications

- (1) The Permittee shall construct and operate the Facility in accordance with the plans and specifications submitted to the Agency and in accordance with the conditions set forth herein, including the equipment specifications as listed in Findings of Fact (A) or their equivalent as approved bytheAgency. [10 v.s.A. §556(c)] [§5·501(1)ofthe Regulations] (2) The Permittee shall construct the woodfired boilerand its associated equipmentwith an energy efficient design as described in their permit application and subsequent submissions to the Agency. These energy efficient design features include, but are not limited to: preheating offluidizing bed airand overfire air using air heaters, fourcycles of feedwater heating, heat recovery from boiler blowdown and a district heat loop (thermal heat loop). The maximum capacity ofthe thermal heat loop will be designed to deliver no less than 

### 20 MMBtu/hr of net heat energy. The actual quantity ofthermal energy delivered through the thermal heat loop will depend upon the actual demand for heat from the businessesand residences on the loop. [§5·502ofthe RegulationsI (3) Air Pollution Control Equipment- Boiler (a) The Boiler shall be equipped with a particulate matter control system consisting ofa fabric filter. The fabric filter shall be maintained in good working order and properly operated whenever the Boiler is combusting fuel, except as provided below. During periods ofstartup, shutdown, and malfunction, the Permittee shall, to the extent practicable, maintain and operate the fabric filter in a manner consistentwith goodairpollution control practicefor minimizing emissions. (b) The Boilershall be equippedwith aselectivecatalytic reduction (SCR) system for controlling nitrogen oxides. All elements ofthe SCR system shall be maintained in good working order and shall be operating whenever the Boiler is running, except during the startup of the Boiler. The startup period for the Boiler ends when the SCR catalyst has reached full operating temperature. A numericvalue forthe full operating temperature ofthe SCR catalyst shall be established in the Facility's Operating Permit. [10 1/.S.A. §556(c)][Applicalion forAP-11·038 [40 CFR§60.11d] (4) The Boiler fabric filter collector shall be equipped with a pressure drop measurement device which continuously measures, displays and permanently records the pressure drop across the fabric filter collector. The Permittee shall use the pressure drop
Page 18of39
No. 62097.

#### J. H. Brown et al. *v.*United States,

protests 226721-K, etc. (El Paso).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of meats, prepared or preserved, not specially provided for, similar in all material respects to the meat the subject of *United States*v. *Mercantil Distribuidora, S. A., et al.*(45 C. C. P. A. 20, C. A. D. 667), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Order entered December 19 , 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05

- 13

- 00456

- CV

WILLIAM CHU, Appellant

V.

DEUTSCHE BANK NATION AL TRUST COMPANY , AS TRUSTEE FOR THE CERTIFICATE HOLDERS OF SOUNDVIEW HOME LO AN TRUST 2005

- OP T3, ASSET

- BACKED CERTIFICATE S ERIES 2005

- OPT3 AND AMERICAN HOME MORTGA GE SERVICING, INC. , Appellee s
On Appeal from the 160th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 09

- 13182



### O RDER

We GRANT the parties’ agreed motion to releas e the supersedeas bond. We ORDER
Gary Fitzsimmons, Dallas County District Clerk, to release the bond and mail the proceeds of the
payment bond to William Chu at his place of business, 4455 LBJ Freeway, #909, Dallas, Texas

75244.

/s/ DAVID L. BRIDGES JUS TICE
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                           <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                12-MOS                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          64,567                  79,714
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                               12,850,463                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            12,915,030                  79,714
<PP&E>                                         474,971                  11,416
<DEPRECIATION>                                  50,005                   2,283
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              15,447,057                  91,777
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       12,817,501                  24,414
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             1                       1
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,629,556                  67,363
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                15,447,057                  91,777
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,399,737                 905,924
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,740,014                 963,639
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               928,781                   9,851
<LOSS-PROVISION>                           (1,269,058)                (67,566)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0                       0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0                       0
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0



</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.4

                    Addendum No. 3 to Master Lease Agreement

                         Dated as of September 19, 1996

         This Addendum amends and supplements the above-referenced Master Lease
Agreement ("the Lease") by and between General Electric Capital Corporation as
Lessor and Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. as Lessee and is hereby incorporated
into the Lease as though fully set forth therein. All terms not otherwise
defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Lease.

         The parties hereto agree that Section XXI(a)(iv) of the Lease requires
Lessee to maintain a total liabilities to tangible net worth ratio of 1.0:1 or
less. The parties hereto agree that from and after the date hereof, any
convertible subordinated notes due in 2007 or thereafter shall not be considered
part of Lessee's liabilities or tangible net worth and therefore not part of the
calculation of the ratio set forth in Section XXI(a)(iv).

         Except as expressly modified hereby, all terms and provisions of the
Lease shall remain in full force and effect. This Addendum is not binding or
effective with respect to the Lease or the Schedules, or the Equipment until
executed on behalf of each of Lessor and Lessee by authorized representatives of
Lessor and Lessee.

         This Addendum is binding upon and inures to the benefit of the parties
hereto and their respective successors and assigns.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Lessor and Lessee have caused this Addendum to be
executed by their duly authorized representatives as of this 13th day of
January, 2000.

LESSOR:                                         LESSEE:

General Electric Capital Corporation            Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

By: /s/ RICHARD DAUPHINAIS                      By: /s/ MICHAEL FALVEY

Name:  Richard Dauphinais                       Name:  Michael Falvey

Title:  VP & Sr. Transaction Mgr.               Title:  VP Finance

Date:  1/13/2000                                Date:  1/11/2000
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 237 

Supporting the goals and ideals of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease 

Awareness Month. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 16, 2007 

Mr. STEARNS (for himself and Mr. LEWIS of Georgia) submitted the following 

concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight 

and Government Reform 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Supporting the goals and ideals of Chronic Obstructive 

Pulmonary Disease Awareness Month. 

Whereas chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (‘‘COPD’’) is 

primarily associated with emphysema and chronic bronchitis; 

Whereas the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 

have estimated that 10,000,000 adults in the United 

States have been diagnosed by a physician with COPD; 

Whereas the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 

have estimated that 24,000,000 adults in the United 

States have symptoms of impaired lung function, indicating COPD is underdiagnosed; 

Whereas COPD is progressive and is not fully reversible; 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•HCON 237 IH 

Whereas as COPD progresses, the airways alveoli in the 

lungs lose elasticity and the airway walls collapse, closing 

off smaller airways and narrowing larger ones; 

Whereas symptoms of COPD include chronic coughing, shortness of breath, increased effort to breath, increased 

mucus production, and frequent clearing of the throat; 

Whereas risk factors for COPD include long-term smoking, 

a family history of COPD, exposure to air-pollution or 

second-hand smoke, and a history of frequent childhood 

respiratory infections; 

Whereas more than half of all adults who suffer from COPD 

report that their condition limits their ability to work, 

sleep, and participate in social and physical activities; 

Whereas more than half of all adults who suffer from COPD 

feel they are not in control of their breathing, panic when 

they cannot catch their breath, and expect their condition 

to worsen; 

Whereas, according to the Centers for Disease Control and 

Prevention, nearly 119,000 adults in the United States 

died of COPD in 2000, making COPD the fourth leading 

cause of death in the United States; 

Whereas the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimated that COPD accounted for 8,000,000 office visits 

to doctors, 1,500,000 emergency department visits, and 

726,000 hospitalizations by adults in the United States 

in 2000; 

Whereas too many people with COPD are not diagnosed or 

are not receiving adequate treatment; and 

Whereas Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Awareness 

Month raises public awareness about the prevalence of 

chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and the serious 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
3 

•HCON 237 IH 

problems associated with the disease: Now, therefore, be 

it 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That Congress supports the goals and ideals 

3 of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Awareness 

4 Month. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
- 399 -

Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets

309 Nebraska Reports

STATE v. MALONE

Cite as 309 Neb. 399

State of Nebraska, appellee, v. 

Kevin W. Malone, appellant.

___ N.W.2d ___

Filed June 4, 2021. Nos. S-20-118, S-20-460. 

supplemental opinion

Appeals from the District Court for Douglas County: Shelly 

R. Stratman, Judge. Former opinion modified. Motion for 

rehearing overruled.

Richard L. Boucher and Bradley H. Supernaw, of Boucher 

Law Firm, for appellant.

Douglas J. Peterson, Attorney General, and Melissa R. 

Vincent for appellee.

Heavican, C.J., Miller-Lerman, Cassel, Stacy, Funke, 

Papik, and Freudenberg, JJ.

Per Curiam.

This case is before us on a motion for rehearing filed by the 

appellant, Kevin W. Malone, concerning our opinion in State 

v. Malone, 308 Neb. 929, 957 N.W.2d 892 (2021). We find 

no substantive merit to Malone’s motion and overrule it, but 

modify the opinion as follows:

In the analysis section, under the heading “2. Postconvic

tion Relief” and the subheading “(b) Claim of Prosecutorial 

Misconduct,” id. at 962, 957 N.W.2d at 920, we withdraw the 

second paragraph and substitute the following:

Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library

www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/

07/02/2021 01:08 AM CDT
- 400 -

Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets

309 Nebraska Reports

STATE v. MALONE

Cite as 309 Neb. 399

The district court first rejected this argument as procedurally barred. However, Malone had amended his 

motion to add an allegation that his appellate counsel had 

been ineffective for failing to raise the claims of prosecutorial misconduct on direct appeal. The district court 

alternatively rejected Malone’s claim, reasoning that even 

if not procedurally barred, the claim failed to “set forth 

the facts and applicable law to establish an objection 

based on any of these prosecutorial [misconduct] claims 

would . . . have been successful.” We agree.

The remainder of the opinion shall remain unmodified.

Former opinion modified.

Motion for rehearing overruled.