STOP SV:

A Technical Package to 

Prevent Sexual Violence

National Center for Injury Prevention and Control 

Division of Violence Prevention

STOP SV: A Technical Package to Prevent Sexual Violence 1

STOP SV: 

A Technical Package to 

Prevent Sexual Violence

Developed by:

Kathleen C. Basile, PhD

Sarah DeGue, PhD

Kathryn Jones, MSW

Kimberley Freire, PhD

Jenny Dills, MPH

Sharon G. Smith, PhD

Jerris L. Raiford, PhD

2016

Division of Violence Prevention

National Center for Injury Prevention and Control

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Atlanta, Georgia
 2 STOP SV: A Technical Package to Prevent Sexual Violence

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Thomas R. Frieden, MD, MPH, Director

National Center for Injury Prevention and Control

Debra E. Houry, MD, MPH, Director

Division of Violence Prevention

James A. Mercy, PhD, Director

Suggested citation:

Basile, K.C., DeGue, S., Jones, K., Freire, K., Dills, J., Smith, S.G., Raiford, J.L. (2016). STOP 

SV: A Technical Package to Prevent Sexual Violence. Atlanta, GA: National Center for Injury 

Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
STOP SV: A Technical Package to Prevent Sexual Violence 3

Contents

Acknowledgements.............................................................................................................................................. 5

External Reviewers................................................................................................................................................. 5

Overview of STOP SV............................................................................................................................................. 7

Promote Social Norms that Protect Against Violence.............................................................................15

Teach Skills to Prevent Sexual Violence........................................................................................................19

Provide Opportunities to Empower and Support Girls and Women.................................................23

Create Protective Environments.....................................................................................................................26

Support Victims/Survivors to Lessen Harms..............................................................................................29

Sector Involvement .............................................................................................................................................33

Monitoring and Evaluation...............................................................................................................................34

Conclusion..............................................................................................................................................................35

References...............................................................................................................................................................36

Appendix.................................................................................................................................................................42
Stock photo ID:54000268
STOP SV: A Technical Package to Prevent Sexual Violence 5

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the following individuals who contributed in specific ways to the development of this technical 

package. We give special thanks to Linda Dahlberg for her vision, guidance, and support throughout the development 

of this package. We thank Division, Center, CDC leadership, and members of CDC Division of Violence Prevention’s 

Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Workgroup for their careful review and helpful feedback on earlier iterations of 

this document. We thank Alida Knuth for her formatting and design expertise. Last but definitely not least, we extend 

our thanks and gratitude to all the external reviewers for their helpful feedback, support and encouragement for this 

document.

External Reviewers

Mark Bergeron-Naper

Massachusetts Department of Public Health

Carrie Bettinger-Lopez

White House, Office of the Vice President

Andrea Bright

Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services

Amalia Corby-Edwards

American Psychological Association

Andrea Hamor Edmondson

Oklahoma State Department of Health

Craig Fisher

American Psychological Association

Donna Greco

National Sexual Violence Resource Center

Jennifer Grove

National Sexual Violence Resource Center

Sandra Henriquez

California Coalition Against Sexual Assault

Rosie Hidalgo

White House, Office of the Vice President

Darlene Johnson

U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Violence 

Against Women

David Lee

California Coalition Against Sexual Assault

Kat Monusky

Washington Coalition of Sexual Assault Programs

Rebecca K. Odor

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 

Administration for Children and Families, Family 

Violence Prevention and Services Program

Lisa Fujie Parks

Prevention Institute

Jen Przewoznik 

North Carolina Coalition Against Sexual Assault

Karen Stahl

National Sexual Violence Resource Center

Kiersten Stewart

Futures Without Violence

Caira M. Woods

White House, Office of the Vice President

The experts above are listed with their affiliations at the time this document was reviewed.
Stock photo ID:63008935
STOP SV: A Technical Package to Prevent Sexual Violence 7

Overview of STOP SV 

This technical package represents a select group of strategies based on the best available evidence to help 

communities and states sharpen their focus on prevention activities with the greatest potential to reduce sexual 

violence (SV) and its consequences. These strategies focus on promoting social norms that protect against violence; 

teaching skills to prevent SV; providing opportunities, both economic and social, to empower and support girls 

and women; creating protective environments; and supporting victims/survivors to lessen harms. The strategies 

represented in this package include those with a focus on preventing SV from happening in the first place as well as 

approaches to lessen the immediate and long-term harms of SV. Though the evidence for SV is still developing and 

more research is needed, the problem of SV is too large and costly and has too many urgent consequences to wait 

for perfect answers. There is a compelling need for prevention now and to learn from the efforts that are undertaken. 

Commitment, cooperation, and leadership from numerous sectors, including public health, education, justice, health 

care, social services, business/labor, and government can bring about the successful implementation of this package.

What is a Technical Package?

A technical package is a compilation of a core set of strategies to achieve and sustain substantial reductions in a 

specific risk factor or outcome.1 Technical packages help communities and states prioritize prevention activities based 

on the best available evidence. This technical package has three components. The first component is the strategy or 

the preventive direction or actions to achieve the goal of preventing SV. The second component is the approach. The 

approach includes the specific ways to advance the strategy. This can be accomplished through programs, policies, and 

practices. The evidence for each of the approaches in preventing SV or its associated risk factors is included as the third 

component. This package is intended as a resource to guide and inform prevention decision-making in communities 

and states.

Preventing Sexual Violence is a Priority

SV is a serious public health problem that affects millions of people each year. SV involves a range of acts including 

attempted or completed forced or alcohol/drug facilitated penetration (i.e., rape), being made to penetrate someone 

else, verbal (non-physical) pressure that results in unwanted penetration (i.e., sexual coercion), unwanted sexual 

contact (e.g., fondling), and non-contact unwanted sexual experiences (e.g., verbal harassment, voyeurism).2

SV is highly prevalent. Approximately 1 in 5 women (19.3%) in the United States have experienced rape or attempted 

rape in their lifetime and 43.9% have experienced other forms of SV. For instance, 12.5% have experienced sexual 

coercion, 27.3% have experienced unwanted sexual contact, and 32.1% have experienced non-contact unwanted 

sexual experiences.3 Although national prevalence studies indicate that women carry the greatest burden of SV over 

their lifetimes, men are also impacted by SV. Approximately 1 in 15 men (6.7%) have been made to penetrate someone 

at some point during their lives, 5.8% have experienced sexual coercion, 10.8% have experienced unwanted sexual 

contact, and 13.3% have experienced non-contact unwanted sexual experiences.3

As with other forms of violence, some racial/ethnic and sexual minority groups are disproportionately impacted by SV. 

Lifetime estimates of rape or attempted rape of women range from 32.3% among multiracial women, 27.5% among 

American Indian/Alaska Native women, 21.2% among Black women, 20.5% among non-Hispanic white women, to 

13.6% among Hispanic women. Among men, 39.5% of multiracial men, 26.6% of Hispanic men, a quarter of American 

Indian/Alaska Native (24.5%) and Black men (24.4%), and 22.2% of non-Hispanic white men have also experienced 

some form of SV in their lifetime.3 Furthermore, among sexual minorities, 46.1% and 13.1% of bisexual and lesbian 

women, respectively, have experienced rape at some point in their lives, and 74.9% and 46.4%, respectively, 

have experienced other forms of SV in their lifetime. Among men, 47.2% bisexual men and 40.2% gay men have 

experienced some form of SV other than rape in their lifetime.4
 8 STOP SV: A Technical Package to Prevent Sexual Violence

SV starts early in the lifespan. Among women reporting a history of 

completed rape, 40% first experienced it before age 18, with more than 

28% indicating they were first raped between the ages of 11 and 17; among 

men who were made to penetrate someone, 71% first experienced this 

before the age of 25, and 21.3% experienced this before the age of 18.3 

While adolescence seems to be a period of high risk, college may also be a 

particularly vulnerable time. In a large, cross-sectional survey of campus sexual 

assault, 20% of the undergraduate women indicated that they had been a 

victim of SV since beginning college.5 

SV is associated with several risk and protective factors. Risk for SV 

perpetration is influenced by a range of factors, including characteristics of the 

individual and their social and physical environments. These factors interact 

with one another to increase or decrease risk for SV over time and within 

specific contexts. Examples of key risk factors for SV perpetration include a 

history of child physical abuse, exposure to parental violence, involvement in 

delinquent behavior, acceptance of violence, hyper-masculinity, traditional 

gender role norms, excessive alcohol use, early sexual initiation and sexual 

risk-taking behavior (e.g., sex without a condom), and association with 

sexually-aggressive peer groups.6 Poverty or low socioeconomic status,7

gender inequality,8 exposure to community crime and violence, social norms 

supportive of SV and male sexual entitlement, and weak laws and policies 

related to SV are also risk factors for SV perpetration.6,9 Less is known about 

protective factors—that is, factors that decrease or buffer the risk for SV. 

However, the evidence suggests that greater empathy, emotional health 

and connectedness, academic achievement, and having parents who use 

reasoning to resolve family conflicts are associated with a lower risk of SV 

perpetration.6 

SV is connected to other forms of violence. Research has demonstrated that experiences with SV are related to 

experiencing other types of violence. For example, girls who have been sexually abused are more likely to suffer 

physical violence and sexual violence re-victimization, and be a victim of intimate partner violence later in life.10 In 

addition, perpetrating bullying in early middle school is associated with subsequent sexual harassment perpetration.11

Adolescents who have experienced forced intercourse at some point in their life are more likely than those who have 

not been forced to have intercourse to have thoughts of suicide.12 The overlap and co-occurrence of SV and other 

types of violence may reflect the presence of shared risk factors across the multiple violent behaviors and experiences. 

As such, approaches that address multiple forms of violence and/or risk factors that are shared across the types of 

violence may be an effective and efficient way to prevent violence. 

The health and economic consequences of SV are substantial. SV victimization may result in injuries that 

are physical (e.g., bruising, genital trauma) or psychological (e.g., depression, anxiety, suicidal thoughts).13 The 

consequences of SV may also be chronic; some victims experience re-occurring gynecological, gastrointestinal, and 

sexual health problems.13 Victims may also suffer from post-traumatic stress disorder.13 SV is also associated with risk 

behaviors (e.g., smoking, excessive alcohol use) for chronic disease and medical conditions (e.g., high cholesterol, 

increased risk of a heart attack).14 In addition, sexual abuse in childhood and forced sexual initiation in adolescence 

are associated with increased HIV- and STD-related risk-taking behaviors, including sex with multiple partners, sex 

with unfamiliar partners, sex with older partners, alcohol-related risky sex, anal sex, and low rates of condom use,9, 15-17 

as well as HIV infection in adult women.18 Other negative consequences of SV victimization include decreased selfesteem and disruptions to daily routine.19 Readjustment after victimization can be challenging and influences recovery 

time. Victims may have difficulty in their personal relationships, in returning to work or school, and in regaining a 

sense of normalcy.13
STOP SV: A Technical Package to Prevent Sexual Violence 9

Society incurs significant costs associated with the long-term physical and mental health consequences of sexual 

victimization.20-22 SV victims exceed non-victims in the average number and cost of medical care visits.23 Beyond 

medical costs, there are productivity costs and other long-term costs to victims and their families such as pain and 

suffering, trauma, disability, and risk of death. For example, findings from one state estimated the total cost of SV 

in 2009 to be $4.7 billion, or about $1,580 per resident.24 This estimate included quality of life, work loss, medical 

(including mental health), and criminal justice costs. In a qualitative study of SV survivors, Loya25 found that SV and the 

trauma resulting from it can have an impact on the survivor’s employment in terms of time off from work, diminished 

performance, job loss, or being unable to work. These impacts disrupt earning power and have a long-term effect on 

the economic well-being of SV survivors. 

SV can be prevented. Public health underscores the importance of primary prevention, or preventing SV before it 

occurs.26,27 A comprehensive approach with preventive interventions at multiple levels of the social ecological model 

(i.e., individual, relationship, community, and societal) is critical to having a population level impact on SV. Compared 

to other types of violence (e.g., youth violence) and other public health topics (e.g., HIV prevention), the evidence 

base for SV prevention is less developed. We must continue to build the evidence base of what works to prevent SV by 

investing in rigorous evaluation of promising prevention approaches. In the meantime, we must act on the evidence 

that does exist. There is evidence that some approaches, such as brief, one-session educational programs aimed at 

raising awareness and knowledge about SV, do not work to prevent SV perpetration.28 To have the greatest impact on 

SV prevention, we must take advantage of the best available evidence and focus on the strategies and approaches 

most likely to impact SV.

To have the greatest 

impact on SV 

prevention, we must 

take advantage of 

the best available 

evidence and focus 

on the strategies and 

approaches most likely 

to impact SV.
 10 STOP SV: A Technical Package to Prevent Sexual Violence

Assessing the Evidence

STOP SV includes programs, practices, and policies with evidence of impact on SV victimization, perpetration, or risk 

factors for SV. To be considered for inclusion in the technical package, the program, practice, or policy selected had 

to meet at least one of these criteria: a) meta-analyses or systematic reviews showing impact on SV victimization or 

perpetration; b) evidence from at least one rigorous (e.g., randomized controlled trial [RCT] or quasi-experimental 

design) evaluation study that found significant preventive effects on SV victimization or perpetration; c) metaanalyses or systematic reviews showing impact on risk factors for SV victimization or perpetration, or d) evidence 

from at least one rigorous (e.g., RCT or quasi-experimental design) evaluation study that found significant impacts 

on risk factors for SV victimization or perpetration. Finally, consideration was also given to the likelihood of achieving 

beneficial effects on multiple forms of violence; no evidence of harmful effects on specific outcomes or with particular 

subgroups; and feasibility of implementation in a U.S. context if the program, policy, or practice has been evaluated in 

another country.

Within this technical package, some approaches do not yet 

have research evidence demonstrating impact on rates of 

SV victimization or perpetration but instead are supported 

by evidence indicating impacts on risk factors for SV (e.g., 

rape-supportive peers, risky sexual behavior). In terms of the 

strength of the evidence, programs that have demonstrated 

effects on SV outcomes (reductions in perpetration or 

victimization) provide a higher-level of evidence, but the 

evidence base is not that strong in all areas. For instance, 

there has been less evaluation of community and societal 

level approaches on SV outcomes. Thus, approaches in 

this package that have effects on risk factors reflect the 

developmental nature of the evidence base and the use of 

the best available evidence at a given time.  

It is also important to note that there is often significant 

heterogeneity among the programs, policies, or practices 

that fall within one approach or strategy area in terms of the 

nature and quality of the available evidence. Not all programs, 

policies, or practices that utilize the same approach (e.g., 

bystander training, empowerment-based training) are equally 

effective, and even those that are effective may not work 

across all populations. Very few evaluations have looked at 

diverse populations (e.g., racial/ethnic or sexual minorities). 

It is also important to note that few programs have been 

designed for diverse populations, so tailoring programs 

and more evaluation may be necessary to address different 

population groups. The examples provided are not intended 

to be a comprehensive list of evidence-based programs, 

policies, or practices for each approach, but rather illustrate 

models that have been shown to impact SV victimization or 

perpetration or have beneficial effects on risk factors for SV. 

In practice, the effectiveness of the programs, policies and 

practices identified in this package will be strongly dependent 

on the quality of their implementation and the communities 

in which they are implemented. Implementation guidance to 

assist practitioners, organizations and communities will be 

developed separately.
STOP SV: A Technical Package to Prevent Sexual Violence 11

 Context and Cross-Cutting Themes 

The strategies and approaches in this package represent different levels of the social ecology with efforts not only 

intended to impact individual behaviors, but also the relationships, families, schools, communities, and social 

structures that influence risk and protective factors for SV and ultimately SV behaviors (see box below). Strategies 

and the approaches within them are intended to work in combination and reinforce each other to influence both 

individual and environmental factors related to SV. While individual skills are important and research has shown some 

skill-based programs to be useful for reducing SV, approaches addressing relationships, schools, communities and 

larger social forces are equally important for a comprehensive approach that can have the greatest public health impact. 

The example programs, policies, and practices have been implemented within particular contexts. Each community 

and organization working on SV prevention across the nation brings its own social and cultural context to bear on 

the selection of strategies and approaches that are most relevant to its populations and settings. Practitioners in the 

field may be in the best position to assess the needs and strengths of their communities and work with community 

members to make decisions about the combination of approaches included here that are best suited to their context.

 STOP SV

Strategy Approach

S Promote Social Norms that 

Protect Against Violence

•	 Bystander approaches

•	 Mobilizing men and boys as allies

T Teach Skills to Prevent 

Sexual Violence

•	 Social-emotional learning

•	 Teaching healthy, safe dating and intimate relationship skills to 

adolescents

•	 Promoting healthy sexuality

•	 Empowerment-based training

O Provide Opportunities to Empower 

and Support Girls and Women

•	 Strengthening economic supports for women and families

•	 Strengthening leadership and opportunities for girls

P Create Protective Environments

•	 Improving safety and monitoring in schools

•	 Establishing and consistently applying workplace policies

•	 Addressing community-level risks through environmental 

approaches

SV Support Victims/Survivors 

to Lessen Harms

•	 Victim-centered services

•	 Treatment for victims of SV

•	 Treatment for at-risk children and families to prevent problem 

behavior including sex offending
 12 STOP SV: A Technical Package to Prevent Sexual Violence

One important feature of the STOP SV package is the complementary, but potentially synergistic impact of the 

strategies and approaches. The strategies and approaches delineate prevention efforts that impact various SVrelated outcomes. The strategies are not mutually exclusive categories, but each has an immediate focus. The strategy 

Create Protective Environments, for example, may ultimately impact SV social norms, but the immediate focus of this 

strategy is to change school, workplace and community environmental factors. Similarly, the approaches within any 

one strategy sometimes have components that cross other strategies. For example, Mobilizing Men and Boys as Allies, 

an approach in the Promote Social Norms that Protect against Violence strategy, includes fostering healthy dating 

relationships which is also found in some of the approaches under the Teach Skills to Prevent SV strategy. 

The strategies and approaches in this package may impact other forms of violence,29 which reflects the 

interconnectedness and overlap between SV risk and protective factors and risk and protective factors for other forms 

of violence. For example, a program within Bystander Approaches has not only been shown to reduce SV, but also 

dating violence and stalking.30 In addition, the approach Teaching Healthy, Safe Dating and Intimate Relationship Skills 

to Adolescents includes an example program that has shown reductions in SV and also peer victimization and weapon 

carrying behavior.31 Further, some of the approaches in this package address early exposures to violence which is a 

risk factor for later SV perpetration. For example, Treatment for at-Risk Children and Families to Prevent Problem Behavior

reflects the strong connection between early witnessing or experiences of violence (e.g., child abuse and neglect) and 

SV.6 Programs described under this approach are intended to promote training, therapy, and other supports early in 

life that can impact risk for SV in adolescence and adulthood. 

SV prevention has always centered on issues related to gender, and gender equality is central to SV prevention. In 

the context of health and SV prevention, gender equality refers to equal rights, responsibilities and opportunities 

that enable all individuals to achieve their full rights and potential to be healthy, contribute to health development, 

and benefit from the results.*,33,34 While most gender-based strategies are defined by male and female identities, it 

is important to recognize and affirm identities that do not necessarily fit into binary male or female sex categories.33 

Many in the field, particularly in the global context, refer to SV as a form of gender-based violence (GBV). In this 

technical package, the strategy Provide Opportunities to Empower and Support Girls and Women directly addresses 

gender equality through specific approaches intended to, for example, improve the social and economic status of 

girls and women. Gender, however, cuts across all strategies included in the technical package and is represented by 

approaches that influence both male and female gender norms, and other risk and protective factors. For example, 

the approach Mobilizing Men and Boys as Allies in preventing SV perpetration is intended to foster healthy, positive 

norms about masculinity, gender and violence. In addition, approaches included under other strategies focus on 

environmental factors that influence social norms related to violence, including gender norms.

The strategies and approaches in this technical package address prevention across the lifespan. Addressing SV over 

the lifespan requires particular attention to children’s critical developmental years and the connections between 

childhood victimization experiences and health and well-being later in life. The experience of violence early in life is 

not only traumatic in childhood, but manifests in poor mental and physical health outcomes, as well as increased risk 

for SV victimization or perpetration later in life. Approaches that promote safe, stable and nurturing relationships and 

environments for children and their families35 are important foundational steps in a comprehensive SV prevention 

effort. Indeed, many of the strategies and approaches in this technical package are focused on children and youth 

given that SV tends to happen early in life for victims. 

* Some gender-based initiatives use the term gender equity, which is related to, but not necessarily a synonym for gender 

equality. Gender equity refers to “fairness of treatment for women and men, according to their respective needs. This may include 

equal treatment or treatment that is different but which is considered equivalent in terms of rights, benefits, obligations and 

opportunities.”32 We use the term gender equality in the package to be consistent with the literature we are citing.
Several approaches in the technical package focus on preventing SV perpetration. This is in keeping with CDC’s 

emphasis on promoting prosocial behavior and creating the context for non-violent behavior, relationships, and 

norms to prevent SV. Preventing behavioral patterns of aggression and violence, particularly from taking shape in 

the first place, is an important step toward achieving population-level reductions in rates of SV. Other approaches 

in STOP SV focus on treatment or risk reduction for SV victimization. For example, Treatment for Victims of SV, an 

approach in the Support Victims/Survivors to Lessen Harms strategy, is exclusively focused on helping victims after 

victimization occurs. Empowerment Based Training is one approach under the Teach Skills to Prevent SV strategy that 

focuses on reduction of risk for SV victimization. Similarly, approaches within the Provide Opportunities to Empower 

and Support Girls and Women strategy aim to strengthen economic supports, leadership, and opportunities for girls 

and women to reduce risk for SV victimization. These approaches can serve as a useful and effective complement 

to efforts focused on the prevention of perpetration, particularly when implemented as part of a comprehensive, 

multifaceted prevention effort. It is critical that any program, practice, or policy focused specifically on reducing risk 

for victimization avoid placing any responsibility, implied or explicit, for potential victimization on participants. 

Implementing STOP SV will require the engagement and investment of multiple sectors. STOP SV includes strategies 

where public health agencies are well positioned to bring leadership and resources to implementation efforts. It also 

includes strategies where public health can serve as an important collaborator (e.g., strategies addressing community 

and societal level risks), but where leadership and commitment from other sectors such as business/labor is critical to 

implement a particular policy or program (e.g., workplace policies). The role of various sectors in the implementation 

of a strategy or approach in STOP SV is described further in the section on Sector Involvement.

In the sections that follow, the strategies and approaches with the best available evidence for preventing SV are 

described. 

STOP SV: A Technical Package to Prevent Sexual Violence 13

Many of the 

strategies and 

approaches in this 

technical package are 

focused on children 

and youth given that 

SV tends to happen 

early in life for 

victims. 

STOP SV: A Technical Package to Prevent Sexual Violence 15

Promote Social Norms that 

Protect Against Violence

Rationale

Changing social norms that accept or allow indifference to violence is necessary to prevent SV. Norms are grouplevel beliefs and expectations about how members of the group should behave. The group can be large or small, 

ranging from the cultural norms of an entire country to those of a small sub-population. Gender norms define 

appropriate behaviors for men and women, and girls and boys, in terms of roles, behavior, and how to relate to one 

another. Restrictive gender norms (i.e., rigid ideas about the appropriate roles and behavior of men and women) 

can serve to support or condone violent behavior in intimate and other relationships. Studies show that individuals 

and communities adhering to restrictive and harmful social norms are more likely to perpetrate physical, sexual, and 

emotional violence against women.6,9 

Approaches

The following approaches seek to change social norms in ways that protect against SV. 

Bystander Approaches. These types of approaches engage individuals to change social norms and provide 

leadership around preventing SV. These types of approaches engage people, often youth, with the purpose of 

promoting social norms that protect against violence. They are also used to motivate people to promote protective 

norms through providing peer leadership around preventing SV and to help when they see behavior that puts others 

at risk and take appropriate steps to safely and effectively intervene. Bystander approaches have typically been 

evaluated in high school and college settings.

Mobilizing Men and Boys as Allies. These approaches provide an opportunity to encourage men and boys to 

be allies in preventing sexual and relationship violence by demonstrating their role in preventing violence and 

supporting victims while also teaching skills and reinforcing norms that reduce their own risk for future perpetration. 

Such approaches work by fostering healthy, positive norms about masculinity, gender, and violence among 

individuals with potential for these social norms to spread through their social networks. Approaches focused on male 

audiences can be implemented in targeted peer groups, such as sports teams or fraternities, or can recruit men from 

high schools, colleges, or community-based organizations for participation. Some programs for youth utilize adult 

male implementers who can serve as strong role models for healthy, positive definitions of masculinity.
 16 STOP SV: A Technical Package to Prevent Sexual Violence

Potential Outcomes

•	 Reductions in acceptability of SV

•	 Increases in favorable beliefs towards safe 

communities 

•	 Increases in favorable attitudes towards women 

and girls

•	 Increases in recognition of abusive behavior 

towards men, women, and children

•	 Increases in bystander behavior to prevent violence 

against men, women, and children

•	 Reductions in negative bystander behavior

•	 Reductions in the perpetration of SV 

•	 Reductions in the perpetration of related forms of 

violence (e.g., stalking, dating violence, intimate 

partner violence)

•	 Reductions in peer support for violence

Evidence 

There is some evidence suggesting that bystander approaches and approaches that mobilize men and boys as 

allies can prevent SV perpetration. 

Bystander Approaches. Experimental evaluations show that programs such as Bringing in the Bystander and 

Green Dot can empower young people to intervene in their peer groups by speaking up against sexist language 

or behaviors that promote violence, reinforcing positive social norms, and offering help or support in situations 

where violence may occur or has occurred.36-38 Evidence suggests that these programs can increase positive 

bystander intervention behaviors (e.g., stepping in to help or speaking up) and increase participants’ confidence 

in their own ability to intervene to prevent violence. Evaluations of Bringing in the Bystander show increases in 

self-efficacy and intentions to engage in bystanding among college students36 and bystander behaviors that 

involve helping friends.39

An evaluation of Green Dot implemented with college students found the intervention campus had an 11% lower 

rate of sexual harassment and stalking victimization and a 19% lower rate of sexual harassment and stalking 

perpetration when compared to two non-intervention campuses.38 Another evaluation found that Green Dot

substantially decreased SV, including sexual harassment, dating violence, and stalking in high schools, including 

a decrease in SV perpetration.30
Mobilizing Men and Boys as Allies. Several programs have been developed and implemented across the country 

and internationally that focus on engaging men and boys as allies, modeling positive masculinity, and changing 

social and peer-group norms related to relationships, violence, and sexuality, but few have yet been evaluated 

and more evidence is needed to understand the effectiveness of these approaches.40 Coaching Boys into Men is 

an example of a program with rigorous evaluation evidence that engages boys through high school athletics 

by providing coaches with training tools to model and promote respectful, non-violent, healthy relationships 

with their male athletes. Coaching Boys into Men has been shown to decrease negative bystander behavior (e.g., 

laughing at sexist jokes) and decrease dating violence perpetration, including physical, sexual, and emotional 

abuse, among male high school athletes.41, 42

STOP SV: A Technical Package to Prevent Sexual Violence 17

Several programs 

have been developed 

and implemented that 

focus on engaging 

men and boys as 

allies, modeling 

positive masculinity, 

and changing social 

and peer-group 

norms related to 

relationships, 

violence, and 

sexuality.

STOP SV: A Technical Package to Prevent Sexual Violence 19

Teach Skills to Prevent Sexual Violence

Rationale 

Individual skill-based learning is an important component of a comprehensive approach to SV prevention. Several 

individual skills are associated with preventing SV, including social-emotional learning skills (e.g., empathy, 

conflict management, and communication), healthy dating and intimate relationship skills, skills related to healthy 

sexuality, and empowerment skills. Building individual skills in these areas can help reduce both perpetration of and 

victimization from SV including sexual harassment, as well as bullying, dating violence, and other factors associated 

with SV (e.g., empathy, increased communication about sex).

Approaches

There are a number of approaches that utilize skills-building training to address SV perpetration, victimization or risk 

factors for SV. These include:

Social-emotional learning approaches. These approaches work in childhood and adolescence to enhance a core set 

of social and emotional skills including communication and problem-solving, empathy, emotional regulation, conflict 

management, and bystanding skills. In addition to providing information about violence, these approaches focus on 

changing the way children and adolescents think and feel about violence and provide opportunities to practice and 

reinforce skills. These approaches have typically been used in middle and high school settings.

Teaching healthy, safe dating and intimate relationship skills to adolescents. These programs strive to reduce 

SV that occurs in the context of dating and intimate partner relationships. Such approaches can work to build 

communication and conflict resolution skills as well as expectations for caring, respectful, and non-violent behavior. 

Opportunities to practice and reinforce these skills are an important part of prevention programs that work. Although 

typically implemented with adolescent populations in school-based settings, these approaches and skills may also be 

useful with young adults.

Promoting healthy sexuality. These approaches focus on comprehensive sex education that addresses sexual 

communication, sexual respect, and consent. These approaches protect against SV by increasing awareness of risks 

and improving communication between parents and youth. They are also cross-cutting in that they often focus on 

sexual health (e.g., risk for HIV or STDs, pregnancy prevention) as well as empowering youth to reduce risk for SV and 

dating violence by encouraging sexual communication and healthy sexual behavior. Although these approaches 

focus on sexual health outcomes, they may also result in decreased risk for SV due to impacts on shared risk factors. 

Specifically these approaches focus on such things as delaying sexual initiation as well as reducing sexual risk-taking 

(e.g., sex without a condom, multiple sexual partners, and preference for impersonal sex) which are all risk factors for 

SV perpetration as well as for STDs and other negative sexual health outcomes.6

Empowerment-based training for women to reduce risk for victimization. These approaches focus on 

strengthening the ability of women to assess risk for violence in relationships and situations and empowering them 

to act. They address potential emotional and physical barriers that may inhibit actions to reduce risk for sexual 

victimization, such as fear, internalized sex role norms, or physical size and strength. Empowerment-based approaches 

that focus on increasing participants’ self-efficacy to identify and reduce exposure to risky situations and people 

through intensive skills training have greater research and theoretical support than approaches focused primarily 

on physical self-defense training. Empowerment-based training approaches have typically been implemented and 

evaluated with college populations.
 20 STOP SV: A Technical Package to Prevent Sexual Violence

Potential Outcomes

• Reductions in SV victimization and perpetration

• Reductions in sexual harassment perpetration

• Reductions in teen dating violence victimization and

perpetration

• Reductions in stalking victimization and perpetration

• Reductions in homophobic teasing victimization

• Increases in self-efficacy and intentions to engage in

active bystanding behavior

• Reductions in peer victimization

• Reductions in weapon carrying

• Reductions in sexual risk behaviors (e.g., sex without a

condom, number of sexual partners)

Evidence

The current evidence suggests several approaches to teach skills that can lead to reductions in SV perpetration and 

victimization or their risk factors. 

Social-emotional learning approaches. These types of approaches have demonstrated reductions in peer violence43

and may also prevent SV. One example is the Second Step: Student Success through Prevention program, which is a 

social-emotional skills based program for middle school students aimed at reducing bullying and SV perpetration. 

The program is delivered over 15 weeks by teachers and includes content related to bullying, problem-solving skills, 

emotion management, and empathy. Lessons are highly interactive and incorporate small-group and classroom 

discussions, activities, dyadic exercises, and individual work. A rigorous multi-site evaluation found that Second Step

was associated with a 39% reduction in SV perpetration and a 56% reduction in homophobic teasing victimization 

in one of the two states where it was implemented; implementation differences between sites may account for the 

variation in effectiveness.44

Teaching healthy, safe dating and intimate relationship skills to adolescents. These approaches, often delivered 

in school settings, build the skills needed to support healthy, safe relationships. One example is the Safe Dates

program, which focuses on teaching healthy relationship skills to adolescents, including positive communication, 

anger management, and conflict resolution. Safe Dates includes a 10-session curriculum focused on attitudes and 

behaviors associated with dating abuse and violence, as well as a play to set the stage for the program, a poster 

contest to reinforce concepts learned in the curriculum, and parenting materials. Results of a rigorous evaluation 

found that Safe Dates reduces physical and sexual violence perpetration and victimization within the dating context 

among 8th and 9th graders. Youth exposed to Safe Dates reported from 56% to 92% less dating violence victimization 

and perpetration compared to controls at follow-up. The effects of the Safe Dates program were sustained for four 

years after implementation.45 Additional research found that Safe Dates also reduced peer victimization and weapon 

carrying behavior among youth receiving the intervention one year after the intervention.31 The program has also 

been found to have similar effects for males and females and for racial minority and non-minority adolescents.45

Promoting healthy sexuality. Comprehensive sex education programs have been shown to reduce high risk sexual 

behavior,46 a clear risk factor for SV victimization and perpetration.6,47
Strong African American Families (SAAF) is a prevention program developed for rural African American parents and 

their preadolescent children. The program seeks to prevent adolescent problem behaviors, including early sexual 

involvement and risky sexual behavior, by focusing on protective parenting practices (e.g., parental involvement, 

limit setting, consistent discipline, monitoring, adaptive racial socialization, general communication, and specific 

parent-child communication and expectations around sexual behavior, alcohol, and substance abuse). A rigorous 

evaluation of SAAF found improvements in parenting practices among parents in the intervention group relative 

to those in the control group.48 Long-term follow up assessments when youth were 17 years old (65 months from 

pre-test) demonstrated that changes in parenting practices mediated changes in sexual behavior among the youth. 

Intervention youth (vs. controls) had higher levels of self-pride and protective sexual norms, which in turn resulted in 

later onset of sexual behavior and engagement in fewer high-risk sexual behaviors. 

Another example is the Safer Choices program which is a multi-component educational program focused on HIV, 

other STDs, and pregnancy prevention and designed to reduce sexual risk behaviors and increase protective 

behaviors among high school students.49 Safer Choices includes student, school staff and parental components. A 

rigorous evaluation of Safer Choices involving 3,869 ninth-grade students revealed that students in schools that 

received Safer Choices (compared to students in comparison group schools that received a standard HIV knowledgebased curriculum) showed reductions at 31 month follow up in several high-risk sexual behaviors (e.g., frequency of 

intercourse without a condom, number of sexual partners with whom students had intercourse without a condom). 

Empowerment-based training for women to reduce risk for victimization. The Enhanced Assess, Acknowledge, Act 

program is a 12-hour victimization prevention program for college-aged women that provides education and skills 

training with the goal of being able to assess risk from acquaintances, overcome emotional barriers in acknowledging 

danger, and use verbal and physical strategies to reduce risk for violence. In a rigorous study of Canadian college 

women, participants were 50.4% less likely to have experienced a rape and/or attempted rape at one year follow-up 

than a control group. Risk of sexual coercion and other non-consensual sexual contact was also significantly lower in 

the intervention group.50

STOP SV: A Technical Package to Prevent Sexual Violence 21

Comprehensive 

sex education 

programs have been 

shown to reduce high 

risk sexual behavior, a 

clear risk factor for 

SV victimization 

and perpetration.

STOP SV: A Technical Package to Prevent Sexual Violence 23

Provide Opportunities to Empower 

and Support Girls and Women

Rationale

Empowering and supporting girls and women through education, employment, income supports and providing other 

opportunities (e.g., for leadership, civic participation) is important for reducing women and girls’ risk for SV. Studies 

show that gender inequality in education, employment, and income results in increased risk for SV.8,51 Poverty and 

low income status have been directly linked to SV and sexual trafficking7,52 and are conceptually linked to vulnerability 

for abuse in that they force women and their children into situations that may put them at increased risk for SV, such 

as walking home alone, living in unstable and unsafe housing, limiting the time and opportunities parents have to 

supervise their children, or engaging in sex work out of financial necessity.53 Cross-national evidence indicates that 

rates of SV are lower in countries where women have higher educational and occupational status.54 Policies and 

programs that improve economic security and stability for women and provide women and girls with opportunities to 

strengthen their education, employment, and income outcomes can reduce the risk for SV victimization. 

Approaches

Two approaches to empower and support girls and women in ways that can reduce their risk for SV include 

strengthening economic supports and increasing leadership opportunities. 

Strengthening economic supports for women and families. This approach addresses poverty, economic security, 

and power imbalances between women and men. The economic security of families depends on women’s access to 

full and equal labor force participation, including having comparable salaries to men, income generating options, 

and work supports such as affordable quality child care through vouchers, lower cost child care, or cash-transfers 

to off-set the cost of quality, full-time child care. Provision of these types of supports to ensure women can remain 

in and contribute substantially to the workforce not only improves their economic conditions and promotes family 

stability, but also decreases gender inequality, which has been linked to risk for SV.8,54 Paid family and medical leave is 

also critical because it provides income replacement to workers for life events such as the birth of a child or a short- or 

long-term illness. When these life events arise, women and children can become vulnerable to financial, employment, 

and housing instability, increasing their risk for SV victimization.7,55

Strengthening leadership and opportunities for adolescent girls. Programs that build confidence, knowledge, 

and leadership skills in young women can lead to greater outcomes in education, employment, and community 

engagement, including political participation. Such programming ideally involves girls as leaders in planning, 

development, and implementation. Effective programs also support family involvement and provide opportunities 

for girls to connect with their cultural and community identities. Effective girls’ programming provides a safe space 

for girls to grow and connect while developing leadership skills and abilities.56 Such approaches may improve 

girls’ educational and occupational opportunities and contribute to the status and influence of women in society, 

potentially reducing risk for SV, given the links between gender inequality, low SES, educational and occupational 

status of women, and risk for SV.7,8,54
 24 STOP SV: A Technical Package to Prevent Sexual Violence

Potential Outcomes

•	 Increases in economic stability for women

•	 Increases in equitable education opportunities

•	 Increases in gender equality and economic and 

occupational status of women

•	 Decreases in poverty of women and children

•	 Decreases in pay differentials between women and men

•	 Increases in employment stability for women

•	 Reductions in sexual violence victimization

•	 Reductions in sexual harassment

•	 Reductions in sexual trafficking

•	 Increases in knowledge of gender norms and health

•	 Increases in knowledge and skills for girls on healthy 

relationships, education and employment, and civic 

engagement

•	 Increased leadership skills for girls and young women 

Evidence 

There are a number of policies and programs with evidence of impact on gender inequality and related risk factors for SV.

Strengthening economic supports for women and families. The majority of states have equal pay laws, although 

the laws themselves vary in terms of the populations covered, remedies available to employees, and the nature and 

extent to which comparable worth provisions are included.57,58 Comparable worth—which means equal pay for women 

and men for equivalent work—is determined by measuring the skill, working conditions, effort, and responsibility 

of positions, and determining pay rates based on these factors.59 Studies of the potential impact of a national 

comparable worth policy on earnings inequality show decreases in overall earnings inequality, inequality between 

women and men, and inequality among women.60,61 More recent findings from an analysis of the 2010-2012 Current 

Population Survey Annual Social and Economic supplement show potential impacts on women’s annual earnings, 

annual family income, and poverty rates even after controlling for labor supply, human capital, and labor market 

characteristics.62 These policies could have an impact on reducing SV by increasing economic stability of women and 

their families, given that economic inequality is a known risk factor for SV victimization.7

Adequate work supports such as affordable and good quality child care are essential to working parents, particularly 

single mothers. The evidence indicates that child care prices can significantly impede married mothers’ labor force 

participation.63 Family-friendly policies such as maternity benefits and paid family and medical leave can also contribute 

to economic security. Women with maternity benefits are more likely to return to their original employers.64 A related 

benefit is that mothers who are employed prior to child birth and who delay returning to work after giving birth 

experience fewer depressive symptoms than those who return to work earlier,65 which suggests the importance of 

maternity leave on the psychological well-being of mothers. While affordable child care and paid family leave policies 

have not been directly linked to reductions in SV, the literature suggests they are linked to mothers staying employed, 

which may be protective against SV victimization given the links in the literature between unemployment and SV.7
STOP SV: A Technical Package to Prevent Sexual Violence 25

Policies and programs 

that improve economic 

security and stability for 

women and provide 

women and girls with 

opportunities to strengthen 

their education, employment, 

and income outcomes can 

reduce the risk for 

SV victimization. 

Income generating options such as Microfinance provide loans and savings opportunities to low-income households 

to improve the financial and social status of women and families.66 Microfinance typically includes incentives for 

repayment (e.g., access to future loans), and social supports such as borrower groups in which members collectively 

guarantee loans for each other. Loan and savings programs are sometimes combined with participatory multisession training on topics that promote empowerment and influence women’s social status and health including 

domestic violence, gender norms, sexuality and HIV. Microfinance is supported by theories of sustainable living that 

hypothesize that individuals and families draw from multiple types of capital—including financial, social, human, 

natural and physical resources—to make a living and survive.53 Kim et al.67 and Pronyk et al.68 found that microfinance 

in combination with training on gender norms and health topics reduced participants experience with past-year 

physical and sexual intimate partner violence by half after two years in the program. Although microfinance has 

been mostly studied in low income countries, the application of sustainable living is relevant to the experiences of 

poor women living in the United States, and microfinance opportunities are viable options for increasing women’s 

household income. This is likely to protect against SV victimization given low income puts women at risk for SV.7 There 

are organizations providing this type of lending in the United States. 

Strengthening leadership and opportunities for adolescent girls. These programs work by building confidence 

and leadership skills in young women as a way to influence their potential in education, employment, and community 

engagement. One example is Powerful Voices, a Seattle, Washington-based organization that provides opportunities 

for adolescent girls to develop individual leadership skills, while also seeking to address root issues for gender 

inequity through social justice. Powerful Voices offers several programs, including: Powerful Choices, a middle school 

curriculum for girls; girl justice training; Girlvolution Conference; community coalitions led by girls; and the Youth 

Employment Program for adolescent girls to build their marketability and job readiness. Evaluation results show that 

after participating in the program, the majority of girls had increased connection to their cultural identity and values, 

increased their ability to develop healthy relationships with peers and adults, received performance evaluations 

indicating “good” or “excellent” job skills, and had increased motivation to excel at school.69 While there is not empirical 

evidence linking this program to reductions in SV, it is expected that school success and improved job skills in 

adolescence will lead to reduced risk of poverty and low educational attainment which are known risk factors for SV 

victimization.7
 26 STOP SV: A Technical Package to Prevent Sexual Violence

Create Protective Environments

Rationale

Creating protective community environments is a necessary step towards achieving population-level reductions 

in SV. Communities can include any defined population with shared characteristics and environments, including 

schools, neighborhoods, cities, organizations (e.g., workplaces), or institutions. Approaches that operate by modifying 

characteristics of the community, rather than individuals within the community, are considered community-level 

approaches. Such approaches can involve, for example, changes to policies, institutional structures, or the social and 

physical environment in an effort to reduce risk characteristics and increase protective factors that affect the entire 

community. Characteristics of the social and physical environment can have a significant influence on individual 

behavior creating a context that can promote positive behavior or facilitate harmful behavior. Although the evidence 

base supporting community-level approaches to prevent SV is less developed than the individual- or relationshiplevel evidence base, it is growing. 

Approaches

The current evidence suggests three approaches with promise for modifying community-level characteristics 

associated with SV to create protective environments. These include:

Improving safety and monitoring in schools. These approaches monitor and 

modify physical and social characteristics of the school environment to reduce SV 

by addressing areas where students feel less safe, to identify safe spaces and staff 

support for students, and to create an atmosphere of intolerance for harassment 

and violence. Although these approaches can have an impact on their own, they 

can be implemented in conjunction with other efforts to educate, teach skills, and 

change social norms related to sexual and relationship violence in schools. Such 

approaches have typically been used in middle and high school environments, but 

could be adapted for use on college campuses or other settings.

Establishing and consistently applying workplace policies. Workplace policies 

address risk factors for SV and create healthy organizational climates. These policies 

are designed to help employees and managers know what is expected of them with 

respect to standards of behavior and can prevent workplace bullying and sexual 

harassment. Research indicates that individual characteristics and organizational 

characteristics interact to create an environment in which sexual harassment is 

tolerated.70 Sexual harassment is a form of SV2

 and it also creates conditions that are 

conducive to other forms of SV.71,72 Individual characteristics can be mitigated by 

changing the organizational culture and tolerance of sexual harassment. 

Addressing community-level risks through environmental approaches. These 

approaches address aspects of neighborhood and other community settings 

to make SV less likely. Such approaches address community-level risk factors by 

changing, enacting, or enforcing laws, regulations, or organizational policies (e.g., 

alcohol policies) or by changing the physical environment, economic or social 

incentives (or consequences) for behavior, or other characteristics of the community 

(e.g., ability to monitor and respond to problem behavior, increased social controls). 

Community-level environmental approaches have potential for population-level 

impact on SV outcomes, often at low cost for implementation.
STOP SV: A Technical Package to Prevent Sexual Violence 27

Potential Outcomes

•	 Reductions in perceived tolerance of sexual harassment and 

violence in communities

•	 Reductions in sexual harassment 

•	 Reductions in excessive alcohol use at the community level

•	 Increases in indicators of community connectedness

•	 Increases in feelings of safety in one’s school, workplace, or 

neighborhood

•	 Reductions in rates of SV at the community level

•	 Reductions in bullying and other youth violence

•	 Reductions in teen dating violence

Evidence 

Current evidence provides some support for these types of approaches in reducing risk for SV. 

Improving safety and monitoring in schools. Research has found that modifying the physical environment 

of schools to increase monitoring in areas perceived as unsafe can have a beneficial impact on rates of sexual 

harassment, other SV, and dating violence among students. Shifting Boundaries building-level intervention is an 

example of a school-based intervention that involves (a) revising school protocols for identifying and responding 

to dating violence and sexual harassment, (b) the use of temporary building-based restraining orders to reinforce 

respectful boundaries between victims and perpetrators, (c) a poster campaign, and (d) increasing staff monitoring 

based on “hotspot” mapping that students complete. Shifting Boundaries building-level intervention was found to 

reduce peer SV perpetration by 40% and sexual harassment perpetration by 34% among middle school students in 

New York City in a rigorous evaluation.73 Reductions were also found for peer SV victimization and SV victimization by 

a dating partner. 

Establishing and consistently applying workplace policies. Proactive Sexual Harassment Prevention Policies and 

Procedures that include commitment from top management, zero tolerance, notification to applicants and new 

hires of harassment-free environments, regular organizational assessments, and consistent, specific training can 

reduce workplace SV behaviors. A national study of Canadian women74 found that proactive versus information-only 

policies were associated with fewer incidents of sexual harassment in the past 12 months. Women in workplaces with 

proactive sexual harassment policies were less likely to be physically threatened or to be the targets of unwanted 

sexual behavior or comments. Women also responded more assertively to unwanted sexual behavior when the 

workplace implemented policy, complaint procedures, and training to prevent sexual harassment. A more recent 

review of previously published workplace ethnographies found that having formal, written grievance procedures 

protected women from predatory harassment—the most threatening and well-defined form of sexual harassment.71

Addressing community-level risks through environmental approaches. Research suggests that changes 

to alcohol-related policies can reduce risk for SV at the community level.75 Excessive alcohol use interacts with 

other individual and community-level risk factors to increase the risk for SV perpetration. Also, the location and 

concentration of alcohol outlets in a community can have a negative impact on characteristics of the community, 

including perceived safety and social connections between individuals, which can in turn influence rates of violence. 

Alcohol policy approaches with the strongest evidence related to SV are those which work to reduce excessive alcohol 

use by increasing prices or reducing the density of outlets in a community. Research has found that higher alcohol 

prices are associated with lower rates of SV victimization in communities, while greater outlet density is linked to 

higher rates of SV.75
Stock photo ID:42715162
STOP SV: A Technical Package to Prevent Sexual Violence 29

Support Victims/Survivors 

to Lessen Harms 

Rationale

Violence victimization in childhood, adolescence, or adulthood can have long-term effects on the psychological 

well-being and functioning of survivors.12,13,76 Exposure to violence and other trauma in childhood can also 

increase risk for later SV perpetration and other problem behaviors in adolescence and adulthood.6 To lessen 

these harms, this strategy employs the use of evidence-based therapeutic and victim centered approaches that 

address the needs of survivors to improve their outcomes and reduce long-term risks for negative psychological 

and behavioral consequences. Approaches for youth, including those at risk for or who have engaged in sexual 

offending behaviors, often address the needs of the family as well to improve parent-child relationships and 

increase the supports available to youth and their parents in their homes and communities. 

Approaches

The current evidence suggests the following three approaches:

Victim-centered services. These approaches include an array of formal services such as support groups, crisis 

intervention, medical and legal advocacy, and access to community resources to help improve outcomes for 

survivors and mitigate long-term negative health consequences. Services are based on the unique needs and 

circumstances of victims and survivors and coordinated among community agencies and victim-advocates.

Treatment for victims of SV. These approaches include a range of evidence-based psychological interventions 

that are conducted in therapeutic settings by licensed providers. Psychosocial interventions help address 

depression, fear and anxiety, problems adjusting to school, work or daily life and other symptoms of distress 

associated with experiencing SV. These types of interventions are associated with improved psychological 

health and long-term positive impact for victims/survivors of SV.77,78 Some programs are designed for specific 

populations of SV victims (i.e., child vs. adult). 

Treatment for at-risk children and families to prevent problem behavior, including sex-offending. Many 

youth at risk for violence perpetration and other serious behavioral problems in childhood and adolescence 

have been exposed to violence in their homes or communities as witnesses or victims.79 These intensive 

therapeutic approaches address the individual, family, school and community factors associated with violence 

perpetration, including sexual offending among these high-risk and high-need youth. Importantly, these 

approaches also focus on strengthening parent-child relationships and parental outcomes, such as stress and 

depression, which influence parenting behaviors that may impact children’s risk for SV perpetration.
 30 STOP SV: A Technical Package to Prevent Sexual Violence

Potential Outcomes

•	 Reductions in short- and long-term negative effects of SV 

victimization 

•	 Reductions in risk for later SV perpetration among victimized youth

•	 Reductions in parental stress and depression and improvements in 

parenting outcomes for parents of youth with behavioral problems

•	 Improvements in parental limit setting, parent-child 

communication, and youth’s prosocial behavior

•	 Reductions in problematic sexual behavior reoffending

•	 Reductions in arrests for sexual crimes

•	 Improvements in family cohesion and adaptability

•	 Improvements in peer relations, including aggression

•	 Improvements in academic performance

•	 Improvements in access to services for SV survivors 

Evidence 

There is strong support for the value of victim-centered services and therapeutic approaches in reducing the shortand long-term impacts of SV. Examples of specific approaches with evidence include: 

Victim-centered services. Rape Crisis Centers provide a safe, healing environment in which survivors can access 

resources and victim advocacy, and studies show that survivors consider the services received as healing and 

helpful.80 A study conducted in one state found that most victims accessing advocacy services reported high levels of 

information (62%), support provision (79%), and help in making decisions (54%).81 Victims who work with advocates 

had more positive experiences with both the medical and legal systems, including increased reporting and receipt of 

medical care, and decreased feelings of distress.82 Other types of services include Sexual Assault Response Teams and 

Sexual Assault Nurse Examiner programs. These are valuable and widely-used practices but currently have not been 

rigorously evaluated. 

Treatment for victims of SV. There are a number of evidence-based treatments for victims of SV. One example is 

Trauma-focused Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (TF–CBT) which is a widely-used, evidence-based treatment for children, 

adolescents, and their non-offending parents/caregivers. The goals of TF–CBT are to address the negative effects 

of sexual abuse (e.g., post-traumatic stress disorder [PTSD], depression, anxiety, and emotional and behavioral 

problems). TF–CBT also enhances parents’ skills to respond to and support their children who have been victims.83

Multi-site randomized controlled trials have shown that TF–CBT can reduce symptoms of PTSD, depression, and 

behavioral problems in child victims of sexual abuse. Research also indicates that improvements are sustained for 

6–12 months after treatment has concluded.84,85 Several psychological interventions, including exposure interventions 

and eye movement desensitization and reprocessing interventions, have also been shown to reduce psychological 

symptoms and improve functioning for survivors of SV.78 Two specific therapeutic modalities show particular promise 

given evidence of continued effects at long-term follow-up. Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT) is an evidencebased psychological treatment that addresses PTSD symptoms among victims of trauma, including rape, using a 

trauma-specific adaptation of cognitive behavioral therapy. Prolonged Exposure Therapy (PET) is an evidence-based 

psychological treatment that addresses PTSD symptoms through the use of exposure therapy. PET has been used 

to treat victims of rape and other trauma, such as war veterans. Both CPT and PET were associated with sustained 

improvements in PTSD and depression symptoms at 6-year follow-up among adult rape victims in an RCT.86
Treatment for at-risk children and families to prevent problem behavior, including sex-offending. The evidence 

is also strong for therapeutic approaches that focus on high-risk children who may have been exposed to violence in 

their homes and communities and are at risk for violence perpetration and other serious behavioral problems. One 

example is the Children with Problematic Sexual Behavior Cognitive-Behavioral Treatment Program: School-Age Program 

(PSB–CBT). PSB–CBT is a family-oriented, cognitive-behavioral, psychoeducational, and supportive treatment group 

designed to reduce or eliminate incidents of sexual behavior problems. The program is an outpatient group treatment 

program for children ages 6 to 12 years and their parents or other caregivers. Treatment for the child focuses on 

acknowledging and identifying inappropriate sexual behavior, learning sexual behavior rules and self-control 

techniques, and sex education. Parents and caregivers receive information on developmentally normal and atypical 

childhood sexual behavior and are taught skills for preventing and responding to the child’s problematic sexual 

behavior. In a 10-year prospective study of children aged 5–12 with sexual behavior problems, significant reductions 

in re-offending were noted for the PSB–CBT treatment group when compared to a play therapy group (2% vs 10%), 

and the PSB–CBT group was reduced to baseline, general-clinic population levels that are very low.87 In other research, 

PSB–CBT has demonstrated improvements in child sexual behavior problems at post-treatment and/or follow-up.88,89

Multisystemic Therapy—Problem Sexual Behavior (MST–PSB) focuses on aspects of a youth’s ecology that are 

functionally related to problem sexual behavior and includes reduction of parent and youth denial about the 

sexual offenses and their consequences; promotion of the development of friendships and age-appropriate sexual 

experiences; and modification of the individual’s social perspective-taking skills, belief system, or attitudes that 

contributed to sexual offending. Families are provided family therapy; youth are provided individual therapy. Bourduin 

and colleagues90 found MST–PSB participants had fewer rearrests for sexual crimes compared with the control group, 

and 83% fewer arrests for sexual crimes at eight-year follow-up.91 In the same study they also found improvements in 

family relations, peer relations, and academic performance. In a randomized clinical trial with juvenile sex offenders, 

Letourneau and colleagues92 found MST–PBS participants had decreased sexual behavior problems, delinquency, 

substance use, externalizing symptoms, and out-of-home placements compared to juveniles in the usual sex offender 

specific treatment.

STOP SV: A Technical Package to Prevent Sexual Violence 31

There is 

strong support 

for the value of 

victim-centered 

services and 

therapeutic 

approaches in 

reducing the 

short- and 

long-term 

impacts of SV.

STOP SV: A Technical Package to Prevent Sexual Violence 33

Sector Involvement

Public health can play an important and unique role in addressing SV. Public health agencies, which typically place 

prevention at the forefront of efforts and work to create broad population-level impact, can bring critical leadership 

and resources to bear on this problem. For example, these agencies can serve as a convener, bringing together 

partners and stakeholders to plan, prioritize, and coordinate SV prevention efforts. Public health agencies are also well 

positioned to collect and disseminate data, implement preventive measures, evaluate programs, and track progress. 

Although public health can play a leadership role in preventing SV, the strategies and approaches outlined in this 

technical package cannot be accomplished by the public health sector alone. 

Other sectors vital to implementing STOP SV include, but are not limited to, education, government (local, state, and 

federal), social services, health services, business/labor, justice, housing, media, and organizations that comprise the 

civil society sector such as rape crisis centers, SV coalitions, faith-based organizations, youth-serving organizations, 

foundations, and other non-governmental organizations. Collectively, these sectors can make a difference in 

preventing SV by impacting the various contexts and underlying risks that contribute to SV.

The strategies and approaches described in the STOP SV technical package are summarized in Appendix A along 

with the relevant sectors that are well positioned to lead implementation efforts. For example, the approaches and 

programs for the first two strategies (Promoting Social Norms that Protect against Violence and Teach Skills to Prevent 

SV) are often delivered in educational settings, making education an important sector for implementation. Health 

departments across the country often work in partnership with school districts and community-based organizations 

to implement and evaluate prevention programs in school settings. Some of these programs may also be suitable 

for delivery in community settings. Through their work with community-based organizations, local and state health 

departments can also play a leadership role in implementing and evaluating these programs in other settings. 

The business, education, and labor sectors, as well as government entities, are in the best position to establish and 

implement policies to advance strategies in the STOP SV technical package such as those focusing on Empowering 

and Supporting Girls and Women through education, employment, and income supports or Creating Protective 

Environments in workplaces and community settings. These strategies go beyond individual behavior change and 

require commitment and support from those sectors that can directly address some of the underlying risks and 

the environmental contexts that make SV more likely to occur. Public health entities can play an important role by 

gathering and synthesizing information, working with other agencies within the executive branch of their state or 

local governments in support of policy and other approaches, and evaluating the effectiveness of measures taken. 

Finally, the STOP SV technical package includes victim-centered services and a number of therapeutic approaches to 

Support Victims/Survivors of SV. Rape crisis centers, SV coalitions, and other professionals who work with victims and 

survivors, in collaboration with justice, housing, social services, and the health care sector, are uniquely positioned to 

identify and deliver critical intervention support and victim-centered services in a manner that best meets the needs 

and circumstances of victims and survivors. The health care sector, working with victim advocates and in collaboration 

with justice and social services, is also uniquely positioned to address trauma and the long-term consequences of 

SV. In addition to having licensed providers trained to recognize and address trauma, the health care sector can also 

coordinate wrap-around behavioral health and social services to address the health consequences of SV and also the 

conditions that may put the patient at risk of repeated violence or perpetration (e.g., among children or adolescents 

with behavioral problems, including sexual offending). 

Regardless of strategy, action by many sectors will be necessary for the successful implementation of this package. In 

this regard, all sectors can play an important and influential role in helping accomplish the work to STOP SV. 
 34 STOP SV: A Technical Package to Prevent Sexual Violence

Monitoring and Evaluation

Monitoring and evaluation are necessary components of the public health approach to prevention. It is important to 

have timely and reliable data to monitor the extent of the problem and to evaluate the impact of prevention efforts. 

Data are necessary for program implementation; planning, implementation, and assessment all rely on accurate 

measurement of the problem. 

Surveillance data helps researchers and practitioners track changes in the burden of SV. Surveillance systems exist 

at the federal, state, and local levels. It is important to assess the availability of surveillance data and data systems 

across these levels to identify and address gaps in the systems. At the federal and state level, the National Intimate 

Partner and Sexual Violence Survey (NISVS) and the Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System (YRBSS) are examples 

of surveillance systems that provide data for SV. NISVS collects information on intimate partner violence, SV, and 

stalking victimization at both the state and national level, including data on characteristics of the victimization, 

demographic information on victims and perpetrators, impacts of the violence, first experiences of these types of 

violence, and health outcomes associated with the violence.93 YRBSS collects information on teen dating violence 

victimization (including physical and sexual), SV victimization, youth violence victimization (including bullying) and 

suicidal behavior among high-school aged youth. This information is available at the local, state, and national levels.94

In addition, there are data at the local level including school surveys, women’s health surveys, criminal justice data 

and other data that are important in local efforts to monitor the problem of SV.

It is also important at all levels (local, state, and federal) to address gaps in responses, track progress of prevention 

efforts and evaluate the impact of those efforts, including the impact of STOP SV. Evaluation data, produced through 

program implementation and monitoring, is essential to provide information on what does and does not work to 

reduce SV rates and risk and protective factors. Theories of change and logic models that identify short, intermediate, 

and long-term outcomes are an important part of program evaluation. 

Much progress has been made in recent years to build the evidence-base for SV prevention through research. 

However, additional research is needed to expand the inventory of SV prevention strategies with known 

effectiveness. Prevention practitioners play a large role in building the evidence-base by evaluating programs 

for impact on SV rates and risk and protective factors. The field will advance if research continues to evaluate the 

effectiveness of programs developed in the practice field, and identifies and tests new programs for high-need 

populations. Additionally, research is needed on the impact of community- and societal-level strategies, including 

policies, the application of social media, and community environmental change, to reduce rates of SV. Lastly, it will 

be important for researchers to test the effectiveness of combinations of the strategies and approaches included in 

the STOP SV package. Most existing evaluations focus on approaches implemented in isolation. However, there is 

potential to understand the synergistic effects within a comprehensive prevention approach. Additional research is 

needed to understand the extent to which combinations of strategies and approaches result in greater reductions in 

SV than individual programs, practices, or policies. 
STOP SV: A Technical Package to Prevent Sexual Violence 35

Conclusion

SV is a significant public health problem but it can be prevented. STOP SV represents the best available evidence to 

address the problem of SV. This technical package includes a range of complementary strategies and approaches 

that ideally would be used in combination in a multi-level, multi-sector approach to prevent SV. It includes strategies 

and approaches that are in keeping with CDC’s emphasis on the primary prevention of perpetration, or stopping SV 

perpetration before it starts, as well as approaches to reduce risk for victimization and to lessen the short- and long-term 

harms of SV. The hope is that multiple sectors, such as public health, health care, education, justice, and social services 

will use this technical package to prevent SV and its consequences. 

Collectively, the strategies and approaches found in this technical package represent CDC’s understanding of the best 

ways to prevent SV based on the current state of the evidence. As previously noted, the current state of the evidence is 

limited and must continuously be built through rigorous evaluation. Decisions on specific programs should be based 

on a thorough understanding of the evidence for a particular program, its applicability to the intended population 

and setting, and best practices for effective prevention.95,96 By continuing to invest in the evaluation of practice-based 

prevention programs and promising practices, researchers and funders can also help to expand our understanding of 

what works to prevent SV. Several innovative studies are currently in progress to uncover promising future directions 

for SV prevention work. As new programs, policies or practices are identified, evaluated, and shown to be effective, they 

will be added to this technical package.
 36 STOP SV: A Technical Package to Prevent Sexual Violence

References 

1. Frieden, T. R. (2014). Six components necessary for effective public health program implementation. American 

Journal of Public Health, 104(1), 17-22.

2. Basile K. C., Smith S. G., Breiding M. J., Black M. C., & Mahendra, R. (2014). Sexual violence surveillance: uniform 

definitions and recommended data elements, Version 2.0. Atlanta (GA): National Center for Injury Prevention and 

Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

3. Breiding, M. J., Smith, S. G., Basile, K. C., Walters, M. L., Chen, J., & Merrick, M. T. (2014). Prevalence and characteristics 

of sexual violence, stalking, and intimate partner violence victimization–National Intimate Partner and Sexual 

Violence Survey, United States, 2011. MMWR Surveillance Summaries, 63(8), 1-18. 

4. Walters, M. L., Chen J., & Breiding, M. J. (2013). The National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey (NISVS): 

2010 Findings on Victimization by Sexual Orientation. Atlanta, GA: National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, 

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

5. Krebs, C. P., Lindquist, C. H., Warner, T. D., Fisher, B. S., & Martin, S. L. (2009). College women’s experiences with 

physically forced, alcohol- or other drug-enabled, and drug-facilitated sexual assault before and since entering 

college. Journal of American College Health, 57(6), 639-647. 

6. Tharp, A. T., DeGue, S., Valle, L. A., Brookmeyer, K. A., Massetti, G. M., & Matjasko, J. L. (2013). A systematic qualitative 

review of risk and protective factors for sexual violence perpetration. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 14(2), 133-167. 

7. Byrne, C. A., Resnick, H. S., Kilpatrick, D. G., Best, C. L., & Saunders, B. E. (1999). The socioeconomic impact of 

interpersonal violence on women. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67(3), 362-366. 

8. Baron, L., & Straus, M. A. (1989). Four theories of rape in American society: a state-level analysis. New Haven: Yale 

University Press.

9. Jewkes, R., Sen, P., & Garcia-Moreno, C. (2002). Sexual violence. In Krug, E. G., Dahlberg, L. L., Mercy, J. A., Zwi, A. 

B., & Lozano, R. (Eds.), World Report on Violence and Health. (pp. 213–239.). Geneva (Switzerland): World Health 

Organization.

10. Trickett, P. K., Noll, J. G., & Putnam, F. W. (2011). The impact of sexual abuse on female development: lessons from a 

multigenerational, longitudinal research study. Development and Psychopathology, 23(2), 453-476.

11. Espelage, D. L., Basile, K. C., & Hamburger, M. E. (2012). Bullying perpetration and subsequent sexual violence 

perpetration among middle school students. Journal of Adolescent Health, 50(1), 60-65.

12. Basile, K. C., Black, M. C., Simon, T. R., Arias, I., Brener, N. D., & Saltzman, L. E. (2006). The association between selfreported lifetime history of forced sexual intercourse and recent health-risk behaviors: findings from the 2003 

National Youth Risk Behavior Survey. Journal of Adolescent Health, 39(5), 752 e751-757. 

13. Basile, K., & Smith, S. (2011). Sexual violence victimization of women: prevalence, characteristics, and the role of 

public health and prevention. American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine, 5(5), 407-417.

14. Smith, S. G., & Breiding, M. J. (2011). Chronic disease and health behaviours linked to experiences of non-consensual 

sex among women and men. Public Health, 125, 653-659. 

15. Maman, S., Campbell, J., Sweat, M. D., & Gielen, A. C. (2000). The intersections of HIV and violence: directions for 

future research and interventions. Socal Science & Medicine, 50(4), 459-478. 

16. World Health Organization. (2004). Violence against women and HIV/AIDS: critical intersections—intimate partner 

violence and HIV/AIDS. Information Bulletin Series 1. Retrieved August 24, 2015, from http://www.who.int/hac/

techguidance/pht/InfoBulletinIntimatePartnerViolenceFinal.pdf
STOP SV: A Technical Package to Prevent Sexual Violence 37

17. Wilsnack, S., Wilsnack, R., Kristjanson, A., Vogeltanz-Holm, N., & Harris, T. (2004). Child sexual abuse and alcohol use 

among women: setting the stage for risky sexual behavior. In Koenig, L., Doll, L., O’Leary, A., & Pequegnat, P. (Eds.), 

From Child Sexual Abuse to Adult Sexual Risk: Trauma, Revictimization, and Intervention. Washington, DC.: American 

Psychological Association Books.

18. Koenig, L., & Clark, H. (2004). Sexual abuse of girls and HIV infection among women: are they related? In Koenig, L., 

Doll, L., O’Leary, A., & Pequegnat, W. (Eds.), From Child Sexual Abuse to Adult Sexual Risk: Trauma, Revictimization, and 

Intervention. Washington, DC.: American Psychological Association Books.

19. Koss, M. P., Goodman, L. A., Browne, A., Fitzgerald, L. F., Keita, G. P., & Russo, N. F. (1994). No Safe Haven: Male Violence 

Against Women at Home, at Work, and in the Community. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

20. Banyard, V. L., Williams, L. M., & Siegel, J. A. (2001). The long-term mental health consequences of child sexual abuse: 

an exploratory study of the impact of multiple traumas in a sample of women. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 14(4), 697-

715. 

21. Campbell, J. C. (2002). Health consequences of intimate partner violence. The Lancet, 359(9314), 1331-1336. 

22. McFarlane, J., Malecha, A., Watson, K., Gist, J., Batten, E., Hall, I., & Smith, S. (2005). Intimate partner sexual assault 

against women: frequency, health consequences, and treatment outcomes. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 105(1), 99-108. 

23. Golding, J. M. (1999). Sexual assault history and medical care seeking: the roles of symptom prevalence and illness 

behavior. Psychological Health, 14, 949-957. 

24. Yang, J., Miller, T. R., Zhang, N., LeHew, B., & Peek-Asa, C. (2014). Incidence and cost of sexual violence in Iowa. 

American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 47(2), 198-202. 

25. Loya, R. M. (2014). Rape as an economic crime: the impact of sexual violence on survivors’ employment and 

economic well-being. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 30(16), 2793-2813. 

26. Basile, K. C. (2003). Implications of public health for policy on sexual violence. Annals of the New York Academy of 

Sciences, 989, 446-463. 

27. Basile, K. C. (2015). A comprehensive approach to sexual violence prevention. New England Journal of Medicine, 

372(24), 2350-2352. 

28. DeGue, S., Valle, L. A., Holt, M. K., Massetti, G. M., Matjasko, J. L., & Tharp, A. T. (2014). A systematic review of primary 

prevention strategies for sexual violence perpetration. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 19, 346-362.

29. Wilkins, N., Tsao, B., Hertz, M., Davis, R., & Klevens, J. (2014). Connecting the Dots: An Overview of the Links Among 

Multiple Forms of Violence. Atlanta, GA: National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control 

and Prevention. Retrieved August 24, 2015, from http://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/connecting_the_

dots-a.pdf

30. Coker, A. L., Bush, H. M., Cook-Craig, P. G., et al. (under peer-review). Effects of the Green Dot bystander intervention 

for reducing sexual violence among high school students: a cluster-randomized clinical trial.

31. Foshee, V. A., Reyes, L. M., Agnew-Brune, C. B., Simon, T. R., Vagi, K. J., Lee, R. D., & Suchindran, C. (2014). The effects 

of the evidence-based Safe Dates dating abuse prevention program on other youth violence outcomes. Prevention 

Science, 15(6), 907-916. 

32. United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization (2000). Gender Equality and Equity. Retrieved 

October 17, 2015 from: http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0012/001211/121145e.pdf

33. World Health Organization. (2015). Gender. Retrieved August 17, 2015, from http://www.who.int/mediacentre/

factsheets/fs403/en/

34. United Nations Entity for Gender Equality and Empowermen (n.d.). Concepts and definitions. Retrieved August 24, 

2015, from: http://www.un.org/womenwatch/osagi/conceptsandefinitions.htm
 38 STOP SV: A Technical Package to Prevent Sexual Violence

35. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2014). Essentials for childhood: steps to create safe, stable, nurturing 

relationships and environments. Atlanta, GA: National Center for Injury Prevention and Control.

36. Banyard, V. L., Moynihan, M. M., & Plante, E. G. (2007). Sexual violence prevention through bystander education: an 

experimental evaluation. Journal of Community Psychology, 35(4), 463-481. 

37. Coker, A. L., Bush, H. M., Fisher, B. S., Swan, S. C., Williams, C. M., Clear, E. R., & DeGue, S. (2015). Multi-college 

bystander intervention evaluation for violence prevention. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, doi: 10.1016/j.

amepre.2015.08.034 (E-pub ahead of print).

38. Coker, A. L., Fisher, B. S., Bush, H. M., Swan, S. C., Williams, C. M., Clear, E. R., & DeGue, S. (2015). Evaluation of the 

Green Dot bystander intervention to reduce interpersonal violence among college students across three campuses. 

Violence Against Women, 12, 1507-1527.

39. Moynihan, M. M., Banyard, V. L., Cares, A. C., Potter, S. J., Williams, L. M., & Stapleton, J. G. (2015). Encouraging 

responses in sexual and relationship violence prevention: what program effects remain 1 year later? Journal of 

Interpersonal Violence, 30(1), 110-132.

40. Flood, M. (2011). Involving men in efforts to end violence against women. Men and Masculinities, 14(3), 358-377. 

41. Miller, E., Tancredi, D. J., McCauley, H. L., Decker, M. R., Virata, M. C., Anderson, H. A, Stetkevich, N., Brown, E.W., 

Moideen, F., & Silverman J. G. (2012). “Coaching boys into men”: a cluster-randomized controlled trial of a dating 

violence prevention program. Journal of Adolescent Health, 51(5), 431-438. 

42. Miller, E., Tancredi, D. J., McCauley, H. L., Decker, M. R., Virata, M. C. D., Anderson H. A., O’Connor, B., & Silverman, 

J. G. (2013). One-year follow-up of a coach-delivered dating violence prevention program: a cluster randomized 

controlled trial. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 45(1), 108–112. 

43. Hahn, R., Fuqua-Whitley, D., Wethington, H., Lowy, J., Crosby, A., Fullilove, M., Johnson, R., Liberman, A., Moscicki, E., 

Price, L., Snyder, S., Tuma, F., Cory, S., Stone, G., Mukhopadhaya, K., Chattopadhyay, S., Dahlberg, L. & Task Force on 

Community Preventive Services. (2007). Effectiveness of universal school-based programs to prevent violent and 

aggressive behavior. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 33(2)(suppl), S114-S129.

44. Espelage, D., Low, S., Polanin, J. R., & Brown, E. (2015). Clinical trial of Second Step© middle-school program: impact 

on aggression & victimization. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 37, 52-63.

45. Foshee, V. A., Bauman, K. E., Ennett, S. T., Linder, G. F., Benefield, T., & Suchindran, C. (2004). Assessing the longterm effects of the safe dates program and a booster in preventing and reducing adolescent dating violence 

victimization and perpetration. American Journal of Public Health, 94(4), 619-624. 

46. Chin, H., Sipe, T., Beeker, C., Elder, R., Mercer, S., Wethington, H., Kirby, D., Elliston, D., Griffith, M., Chuke, S., Matthew, 

A., Briss, S., Ericksen, I., Galbraith, J., Herbst, J.H., Johnson, R., Kraft, J., Noar, S., Romero, L., Ruedt, D., Santelli, J., & 

the Community Preventive Services Task Force. (2012). The effectiveness of comprehensive risk reduction and 

abstinence education interventions to prevent or reduce the risk of adolescent pregnancy, HIV and STIs: two 

systematic reviews and meta-analyses. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 42(3), 272-294.

47. Stockman, J. K., Campbell, J. C., & Celentano, D. D. (2010). Sexual violence and HIV risk behaviors among a nationally 

representative sample of heterosexual American women: the importance of sexual coercion. Journal of Acquired 

Immune Deficiency Syndrome, 53(1), 136-143. 

48. Murry, V. M., Berkel, C., Chen, Y. F., Brody, G. H., Gibbons, F. X., & Gerrard, M. (2011). Intervention induced changes 

on parenting practices, youth self-pride and sexual norms to reduce HIV-related behaviors among rural African 

American youths. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 40(9), 1147-1163. 

49. Coyle, K., Basen-Engquist, K., Kirby, D., Parcel, G., Banspach, S., Collins, J., Baumler, E., Carvajal, S., & Harrist, R. (2001). 

Safer choices: reducing teen pregnancy, HIV, and STDs. Public Health Reports, 116 Suppl 1, 82-93. 
STOP SV: A Technical Package to Prevent Sexual Violence 39

50. Senn, C. Y., Eliasziw, M., Barata, P. C., Thurston, W. E., Newby-Clark, I. R., Radtke, H. L., & Hobden, K. L. (2015). Efficacy of 

a sexual assault resistance program for university women. New England Journal of Medicine, 372(24), 2326-2335. 

51. World Health Organization. (2010). Social determinants of sexual and reproductive health: informing 

future research and programme implementation. Retrieved August 24, 2015, from http://apps.who.int/iris/

bitstream/10665/44344/1/9789241599528_eng.pdf

52. Greenbaum, V. J. (2014). Commercial sexual exploitation and sex trafficking of children in the United States. Current 

Problems in Pediatric and Adolescent Health Care, 44(9), 245-269. 

53. Jewkes, R., Gibbs, A., Jama-Shai, N., Willan, S., Misselhorn, A., Mushinga, M., Washington, L., Mbatha, N., & Skiweyiya, 

Y. (2014). Stepping Stones and Creating Futures intervention: shortened interrupted time series evaluation of a 

behavioural and structural health promotion and violence prevention intervention for young people in informal 

settlements in Durban, South Africa. BMC Public Health, 14, (1325). doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-1325

54. Yodanis, C. L. (2004). Gender inequality, violence against women, and fear: a cross-national test of the feminist 

theory of violence against women. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19(6), 655-675. 

55. Wenzel, S. L., Koegel, P., & Gelberg, L. (2000). Antecedents of physical and sexual victimization among homeless 

women: a comparison to homeless men. American Journal of Community Psychology, 28(3), 367-390. 

56. Ms. Foundation for Women. (2001). The new girls’ movement: implications for youth programs. Retrieved August 14, 

2015, from https://www.nttac.org/views/docs/jabg/grpcurriculum/girls_movement.pdf.

57. National Conference of State Legislators. (2015). Westlaw 50-state statutory database, 2015. Accessed 1/10/2016. 

http://www.ncsl.org/research/labor-and-employment/equal-pay-laws.aspx. 

58. Institute for Women’s Policy Research. (2015). Status of Women in the States: 2015. Washington, DC. (IWPR #R401). 

Retrieved on January 10, 2016 from: http://www.iwpr.org/publications/pubs/the-status-of-women-in-the-states2015-full-report

59. Levine, L. (2004).The gender wage gap and pay equity: is comparable worth the next step? Washington, DC: 

Congressional Research Service.

60. Figart, D. M., & Lapidus, J. (1996). The impact of comparable worth on earnings inequality. Work and Occupations, 23(3), 

297-318.

61. Sorenson, E. (1987). Effect of comparable worth policies on earnings. Industrial Relations, 26(3), 227–239. 

62. Hartmann, H., Hayes, J., & Clark J. (2014). How Equal Pay for Working Women would Reduce Poverty and Grow the 

American Economy. Washington, DC.: Institute for Women’s Policy Research, Briefing paper (IWPR #C411). Retrieved 

on January 10, 2016 from: (http://www.iwpr.org/publications/pubs/how-equal-pay-for-working-women-wouldreduce-poverty-and-grow-the-american-economy). 

63. Kimmel, J. (1998). Child care costs as a barrier to employment for single and married mothers. Review of Economics 

and Statistics, 80(2), 287-299. 

64. Waldfogel, J. (1997). Working mothers then and now: a cross-cohort analysis of the effects of maternity leave on womens 

pay. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Population Association of America, New Orleans, LA. 

65. Chatterji, P., & Markowitz, S. (2005). Does the length of maternity leave affect maternal health? Southern Economic 

Journal, 72(1), 16-41. 

66. Hardee, K., Gay, J., Croce-Galis, M., & Peltz, A. (2014). Strengthening the enabling environment for women and girls: 

what is the evidence in social and structural approaches in the HIV response? Journal of International AIDS Society, 

17(1), 18619. 
 40 STOP SV: A Technical Package to Prevent Sexual Violence

67. Kim, J. C., Watts, C. H., Hargreaves, J. R., Ndhlovu, L. X., Phetla, G., Morison, L. A., Busza, J., Porter, J. D., & Pronyk, 

P. (2007). Understanding the impact of a microfinance-based intervention on women’s empowerment and the 

reduction of intimate partner violence in South Africa. American Journal of Public Health, 97(10), 1794-1802. 

68. Pronyk, P. M., Hargreaves, J. R., Kim, J. C., Morison, L. A., Phetla, G., Watts, C., Busza, J., & Porter, J. D. (2006). Effect 

of a structural intervention for the prevention of intimate-partner violence and HIV in rural South Africa: a cluster 

randomised trial. The Lancet, 368(9551), 1973-1983. 

69. Powerful Voices. (2011). Outcomes for girls: highlights of our 2011 outcome evaluation results. Retrieved August 14, 

2015, from http://www.powerfulvoices.org/success/2011results.shtml.

70. Bell, M. P., Quick, J. C., & Cycyota, C. S. (2002). Assessment and prevention of sexual harassment of employees: an 

applied guide to creating healthy organizations. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 10(1/2), 160-167. 

71. Chamberlain, L. J., Crowley, M., Tope, D., & Hodson, R. (2008). Sexual harassment in organizational context. Work and 

Occupations, 35(3), 262-295. 

72. Sadler, A. G., Booth, B. M., Cook, B. L., & Doebbeling, B. N. (2003). Factors associated with women’s risk of rape in the 

military environment. American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 43(3), 262-273. 

73. Taylor, B. G., Stein, N. D., Mumford, E. A., & Woods, D. (2013). Shifting Boundaries: an experimental evaluation of a 

dating violence prevention program in middle schools. Prevention Science, 14, 64-76. 

74. Gruber, J. E. (1998). The impact of male work environments and organizational policies on women’s experiences of 

sexual harassment. Gender & Society, 12(3), 301-320. 

75. Lippy, C., & DeGue, S. (2014). Exploring alcohol policy approaches to prevent sexual violence perpetration. Trauma, 

Violence, & Abuse, 17(1), 26-42. 

76. Leeb, R. T., Lewis, T., & Zolotor, A. (2011). A review of the physical and mental health consequences of child abuse 

and neglect and implications for practice. American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine, 5(5), 454-468. 

77. World Health Organization. (2013). Responding to intimate partner violence and sexual violence against 

women. WHO clinical and policy guidelines. Retrieved August 24, 2015, from http://apps.who.int/iris/

bitstream/10665/85240/1/9789241548595_eng.pdf.

78. Parcesepe, A. M., Martin, S. L., Pollock, M. D., & Garcia-Moreno, C. (2015). The effectiveness of mental health 

interventions for adult female survivors of sexual assault: a systematic review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 25,

15-25. 

79. Fehon, D. C., Grilo, C. M., & Lipschitz, D. S. (2005). A comparison of adolescent inpatients with and without a history 

of violence perpetration: impulsivity, PTSD, and violence risk. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 193(6), 405-411. 

80. Campbell, R., Wasco, S. M., Ahrens, C. E., Sefl, T., & Barnes, H. E. (2001). Preventing the “second rape”: rape survivors’ 

experiences with community service providers. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 16(12), 1239-1259.

81. Wasco, S. M., Campbell, R., Howard, A., Mason, G. E., Staggs, S. L., Schewe, P. A., & Riger, S. (2004). A statewide 

evaluation of services provided to rape survivors. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19(2), 252-263.

82. Campbell, R. (2006). Rape survivors’ experiences with the legal and medical systems: do rape victim advocates make 

a difference? Violence Against Women, 12(1), 30-45.

83. National Registry of Evidence-based Programs and Practices (NREPP), Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services 

Administration. Trauma-Focused Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (TF-CBT) intervention summary. Program reviewed in 

2008. Retrieved on August 24, 2015 from: http://legacy.nreppadmin.net/ViewIntervention.aspx?id=135. 
STOP SV: A Technical Package to Prevent Sexual Violence 41

84. Cohen, J. A., Deblinger, E., Mannarino, A. P., & Steer, R. A. (2004). A multisite, randomized controlled trial for children 

with sexual abuse-related PTSD symptoms. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 43(4), 

393-402. 

85. Deblinger, E., Mannarino, A. P., Cohen, J. A., & Steer, R. A. (2006). A follow-up study of a multisite, randomized, 

controlled trial for children with sexual abuse-related PTSD symptoms. Journal of the American Academy of Child and 

Adolescent Psychiatry, 45(12), 1474-1484. 

86. Resick, P. A., Williams, L. F., Suvak, M. K., Monson, C. M., & Gradus, J. L. (2012). Long-term outcomes of cognitivebehavioral treatments for posttraumatic stress disorder among female rape survivors. Journal of Consulting and 

Clinical Psychology, 80(2), 201-210. 

87. Carpentier, M., Silovsky, J. F., & Chaffin, M. (2006). Randomized trial of treatment for children with sexual behavior 

problems: ten year follow-up. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 74(3), 482-488. 

88. Cohen, J. A., & Mannarino, A. P. (1997). A treatment study for sexually abused preschool children: outcome during a 

one-year follow-up. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 36, 1228-1235. 

89. Friedrich, W. N., Luecke, W., Beilke, R. L., & Place, V. (1992). Psychotherapy outcome with sexually abused boys: an 

agency study. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 7, 396-409. 

90. Borduin, C. M., Henggeler, S. W., Blaske, D. M., & Stein, R. J. (1990). Multisystemic treatment of adolescent sexual 

offenders. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 35, 105-114. 

91. Borduin, C. M., Schaeffer, C. M., & Heiblum, N. (2009). A randomized clinical trial of multisystemic therapy with 

juvenile sexual offenders: effects on youth social ecology and criminal activity. Journal of Consulting and Clinical 

Psychology, 77, 26-37. 

92. Letourneau, E. J., Henggeler, S. W., Borduin, C. M., Schewe, P. A., McCart, M. R., Chapman, J. E., & Saldana, L. (2009). 

Multisystemic therapy for juvenile sexual offenders: 1-year results from a randomized effectiveness trial. Journal of 

Family Psychology, 23(1), 89-102. 

93. Black, M. C., Basile, K. C., Breiding, M. J., Smith, S. G., Walters, M. L., Merrick, M. T., Chen, J., & Stevens, M. (2011). The 

National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey (NISVS): 2010 Summary Report. Atlanta, GA: National Center for 

Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

94. Kann, L., Kinchen, S., Shanklin, S. L., Flint, K. H., Kawkins, J., Harris, W. A., Lowry, R., Olsen, E. O., McManus, T., Chyen, 

D., Whittle, L., Taylor, E., Demissie, Z., Brener, N., Thornton, .J, Moore, J., & Zaza, S. (2014). Youth risk behavior 

surveillance–United States, 2013. MMWR Surveillance Summaries, 63 Suppl 4, 1-168. 

95. Nation, M., Crusto, C., Wandersman, A., Kumpter, K.L., Seybolt, D., Morrissey-Kane, E, & Davino, K. (2013). What works 

in prevention: principles of effective prevention programs. American Psychologist, 58, 449-456. 

96. Puddy, R. W., & Wilkins, N. (2011). Understanding Evidence Part 1: Best Available Research Evidence. A Guide to the 

Continuum of Evidence of Effectiveness. Atlanta, GA: National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for 

Disease Control and Prevention. Retrieved August 24, 2015, from http://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/

understanding_evidence-a.pdf.
 42 STOP SV: A Technical Package to Prevent Sexual Violence

O

Appendix: Summary of Strategies 

and Approaches to STOP SV 

T

S

Strategy Approach/Program,

Practice or Policy

Best Available Evidence

Lead Sectors1 SV

Perpetration

SV

Victimization

Risk Factors 

for SV

Promote Social 

Norms that Protect 

Against Violence

Bystander approaches Public Health

Education

Green Dot  

Bringing in the Bystander 

Mobilizing men and boys as allies Public Health

Coaching Boys into Men  Education

Teach Skills to 

Prevent SV

Social-emotional learning Public Health

Second Step   Education

Teaching healthy, safe dating, and intimate relationship skills to adolescents Public Health 

Safe Dates   Education

Promoting healthy sexuality

Public Health

Education

Strong African American 

Families–SAAF 

Safer Choices 

Empowerment-based training Education

Public Health

Justice

Enhanced Assess, Acknowledge 

Act 

Provide 

Opportunities

to Empower and 

Support Girls and 

Women

Strengthening economic supports for women and families 

Business/labor

Government 

(local, state, 

Federal)

Comparable worth policies 

Adequate work supports 

(subsidized child care, cash transfers, 

maternity benefits, other paid leave) 



Microfinance 

Strengthening leadership and opportunities for girls

Powerful Voices 

1 This column refers to the lead sectors well positioned to bring leadership and resources to implementation efforts. For each strategy, there 

are many other sectors such as non-governmental organizations that are instrumental to prevention planning and implementing the specific 

programmatic activities.

2 Services are designed to provide support to victims and survivors. 

3 Treatments are designed to address psychological consequences of victimization.
STOP SV: A Technical Package to Prevent Sexual Violence 43

SV

P

Strategy Approach/Program,

Practice or Policy

Best Available Evidence

Lead Sectors1 SV

Perpetration

SV

Victimization

Risk Factors 

for SV

Create Protective 

Environments

Improving safety and monitoring in schools Public Health 

Education Shifting Boundaries Building-level 

Intervention  

Establishing and consistently applying workplace policies

Business/labor

Government 

(local, state, 

Federal)

Proactive sexual harassment 

prevention policies and 

procedures



Addressing community-level risks through envirnomental approaches

Alcohol policies 

(outlet density, pricing) 

Support Victims/

Survivors to Lessen 

Harms

Victim-centered services Community 

organizations 

(rape crisis centers, 

SV coalitions)

Justice

Social Services

Crisis intervention, medical 

and legal advocacy, access to 

community resources

N/A2 N/A2 N/A2

Treatment for victims of SV

Health Care

Social Services

Trauma-focused Cognitive 

Behavioral Therapy (TF-CBT), 

Cognitive Processing Therapy 

(CPT), Prolonged Exposure 

Therapy (PET)

N/A3 N/A3 N/A3

Treatment for at-risk children and families to prevent problem behavior 

including sex offending

Health Care

Social Services

Justice

Children with Problematic Sexual 

Behavior Cognitive-Behavioral 

Treatment Program: School-Age 

Program (PSB–CBT)

 

Multisystemic Therapy–Problem 

Sexual Behavior (MST–PSB)  

1 This column refers to the lead sectors well positioned to bring leadership and resources to implementation efforts. For each strategy, there 

are many other sectors such as non-governmental organizations that are instrumental to prevention planning and implementing the specific 

programmatic activities.

2 Services are designed to provide support to victims and survivors. 

3 Treatments are designed to address psychological consequences of victimization.


For more information

To learn more about sexual violence prevention, call 

1-800-CDC-INFO or visit CDC’s violence prevention 

pages at www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention.

AK2016

TM

National Center for Injury Prevention and Control

Division of Violence Prevention