alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000102438
<NAME> USP REAL ESTATE INTESTMENT TRUST
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                       1,837,689
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  628,678
<ALLOWANCES>                                   131,601
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,675,316
<PP&E>                                      39,654,127
<DEPRECIATION>                              11,113,764
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              32,483,639
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,250,492
<BONDS>                                     14,935,400
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     3,880,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  12,417,747
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                32,483,639
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,054,7556
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,291,634
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               313,287
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,123,276
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                718,315
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            718,315
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   718,315
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .19
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Nuclear Regulatory Commission

                    The 179th Advisory Committee on Nuclear Waste (ACNW) meeting scheduled to be held on May 16-17, 2007, Room T-2B3, Two White Flint North, 11545 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland has been revised as noted below. Notice of this meeting was previously published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on Thursday, April 26, 2007 (72 FR 20889).                 

                    The discussion of the item on                     *Yucca Mountain Preclosure Repository Design: NRC Staff Review Readiness and Views on the Issues,*                     scheduled between 1 p.m. and 4 p.m. on Wednesday, May 16, 2007, is now scheduled between 1 p.m. and 3:30 p.m.                 

                    The discussion of the topic on                     *NCRP Study on Radiation Exposure of U.S. Population,*                     scheduled between 4 p.m.—6 p.m. on Wednesday, May 16, 2007 has been canceled. A discussion of                     *ACNW Letter Reports*                     will now take place between 3:45 p.m. and 5:30 p.m on Wednesday, May 16, 2007. All the other items remain the same as previously published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on Thursday, April 26, 2007 (72 FR 20889).                 

For further information, contact Mr. Antonio L. Dias, (Telephone 301-415-6805), between 6:45 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., ET. 

Dated: May 1, 2007. 

Andrew L. Bates, 

Advisory Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. E7-8676 Filed 5-4-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
No. 62070.

#### Georg Jensen, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 314098-K (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of laminated chairs similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Davies Turner & Co.*v. *United States*(45 C. C. P. A. 39, C. A. D. 669), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

February 7, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice 131854 & (24) Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 131854 COA: 267481 Lapeer CC: 00-007103-FC JEFFREY ALAN MAXON, SR., Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

By order of December 13, 2 006, the prosecuting attorney was directed to answer the application for leave to appe al the July 26, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals. On order of the Court, the answer having been received, the appli cation for leave to appeal is again considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302 (G)(1), in lieu of gran ting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the La peer Circuit Court for resent encing. The defendant was sentenced under the judicial sentencing guide lines even though all of the offenses he was convicted of occurred after the effective da te of the legislative sentencing guidelines, MCL 777.1, et seq . On remand, the Lapeer Circuit Court shall sentence the defendant within the appropriate legisl ative sentencing guidelines range , or articulate on the record a substantial and compelling reason for depart ing from the sentencing guidelines range in accordance with People v Babcock , 469 Mich 247 (2003). In all other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the remaining questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

p0131 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

February 7, 2007

Clerk
No. 49406.

#### Protests 943957-G, etc., of Joy Food Shoppe et al. (San Francisco).

*309Opinion by

Cole, J.

The merchandise was classified and claimed dutiable at the same rates and under the same paragraphs as similar merchandise covered by the decision in *Quong Yuen Shing Co.*v. *United States*(31 C. C. P. A. 43, C. A. D. 247). In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of said cited case, the record in which was incorporated heroin, the merchandise at bar was found to contain salt and was therefore excluded from paragraph 5. The protests were sustained to this extent.
```

[106th Congress Public Law 336]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

<DOC>
[DOCID: f:publ336.106]

[[Page 114 STAT. 1310]]

Public Law 106-336
106th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
  500 North Washington Street in Rockville, Maryland, as the ``Everett 
  Alvarez, Jr. Post Office Building''. <<NOTE: Oct. 19, 2000 -  [H.R. 
                                4484]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 500 
North Washington Street in Rockville, Maryland, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Everett Alvarez, Jr. Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Everett Alvarez, Jr. Post 
Office Building''.

    Approved October 19, 2000.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 4484:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 146 (2000):
            Sept. 6, considered and passed House.
            Oct. 6, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
#### Morton Sundour Co., Inc. *v.*United States

No. 6452.

Entry No. 723285, etc.

Invoices dated Carlisle, England, September 17, 1941, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., November 6, 1941, etc.

(Decided October 24, 1946)

*Brooks & Brooks*for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Kincheloe, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-1289

CARLOS P. HALE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

KENNETH S. APFEL, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Big Stone Gap. Glen E. Conrad, Magistrate

Judge. (CA-96-193)

Submitted: August 13, 1998 Decided: August 31, 1998

Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Carlos P. Hale, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Drum, SOCIAL SECURITY

ADMINISTRATION, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; John Francis Corcoran,

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate

judge under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (1994).

2

PER CURIAM:

Carlos P. Hale pursued a claim for a period of disability and

disability insurance benefits under the Social Security Act,

alleging that he was disabled due to back pain and mental health

problems. An administrative law judge (ALJ) denied benefits, reasoning that Hale was not disabled because his medical problems did

not prevent him from performing several specific work roles involving light work activity. The Appeals Council adopted the ALJ’s

decision, and the magistrate judge affirmed, finding that the ALJ’s

decision was legally correct and supported by substantial evidence.* See Craig v. Chater, 76 F.3d 585, 589 (4th Cir. 1996)

(“Under the Social Security Act, [federal courts] must uphold the

factual findings of the Secretary if they are supported by

substantial evidence and were reached through application of the

correct legal standard.”).

Hale now appeals, asserting that the ALJ erred in concluding

that he was not totally disabled due to his back pain and depression. Having carefully considered the record, we conclude that the

magistrate judge was correct and affirm on his reasoning. See Hale

v. Apfel, Commissioner, No. CA-96-193 (W.D. Va. Jan. 30, 1998). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
3

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

OF MARYLAND

Misc. Docket AG No s

. 8 & 64

September Term, 201 8

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION

OF MARYLAND

v.

ARLENE ADASA SMITH

- SCOTT

Barbera, C.J.

McDonald

Watts

Hotten

Getty

Booth

Biran

,

JJ.

PER CURIAM ORDER

Filed: January 10, 2020 Circuit Court for Prince George’s County

Case No. CAE

- 18

- 23035

Case No. CAE

- 19

- 08617

Argued: January 10, 2020ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE * IN THE

COMMISSION OF MARYLAND

* COURT OF APPEALS

v. * OF MARYLAND

ARLENE ADASA SMITH

- SCOTT * Misc. Docket AG No s

. 8 & 64

September Term, 201 8

PER CURIAM ORDER

For reasons to be stated in an opinion later to be filed, it is this 10 th day of January

20 20

,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the Respondent, Arlene

Adasa Smith

- Scott be, and s he is hereby, disbarred, effective immediately, from the

further practice of law in the State of Maryland; and it is further

ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of Arlene Adasa

Smith

- Scott from the register of attorneys, and pursuant to Maryland Rule 19

- 761 , shall

certify that fact to the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund and the clerks of all judici al

tribunals in the State; and it is further

ORDERED that Respondent shall pay all costs as taxed by the Clerk of this Court,

including the costs of all transcripts, pursuant to Maryland Rule 1 9

- 7 09 , for which sum

judgment is entered in favor of the Attorn ey Grievance Commission of Maryland against

Arlene Adasa Smith

- Scott

.

/s/ Mary Ellen Barbera

Chief Judge
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

    We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8) pertaining to the 1999 Equity Incentive Plan (No. 333-88435), 1999
Employee Stock Purchase Plan (No. 333-88435), and Net Effect Systems, Inc. 1997
Stock Plan (No. 333-95687), and in the related Prospectuses, of Ask Jeeves, Inc.
of our report dated January 17, 2000, except for Note 13, as to which the date
is March 13, 2000, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and
financial statement schedule of Ask Jeeves, Inc. included in this annual report
(Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1999.

/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Walnut Creek, California
March 24, 2000
Case No. 13,967.

#### THOMPSON v. MANUFACTURING CO.

[Cited in Thompson v. American Bank Note Co., 35 Fed. 204. Nowhere reported; opinion not now accessible.]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                            <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                3-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         MAR-31-1997             MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                              DEC-31-1996             DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       234,389                 234,389
<SECURITIES>                                       0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                              2,166,719               2,166,719
<ALLOWANCES>                                  50,000                  50,000
<INVENTORY>                                3,888,301               3,888,301
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           7,745,997               7,745,997
<PP&E>                                     1,805,886               1,805,886
<DEPRECIATION>                               123,268                 123,268
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            10,329,971              10,329,971
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      3,262,655               3,262,655
<BONDS>                                            0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                        0                       0
<COMMON>                                      32,456                  32,456
<OTHER-SE>                                 5,680,025               5,680,025
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              10,329,971              10,329,971
<SALES>                                    3,677,423              13,261,441
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           3,677,423              13,261,441
<CGS>                                      2,972,936              10,983,858
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              2,972,936              10,983,858
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             807,087               2,761,141
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           100,793                 340,871
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (286,957)               (963,434)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (286,957)               (963,434)
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0                       0
<CHANGES>                                          0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                (286,957)               (963,434)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (.09)                   (.30)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.09)                   (.30)
        

</TABLE>
AFFIRMED and Opinion Filed February 1, 2019 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-17-01177-CR 

No. 05-17-01178-CR 

RAYMON STEFFANI LAWRENCE, Appellant 

V. 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee 

On Appeal from the 291st Judicial District Court 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause Nos. F16-20873-U, F17-00600-U 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Justices Bridges, Brown, and Whitehill 

Opinion by Justice Bridges 

Appellant Raymon Steffani Lawrence pleaded guilty before a jury to two offenses of 

aggravated robbery with a deadly weapon, a firearm. After finding appellant guilty, the jury 

assessed punishment at thirty-five years’ imprisonment in each case. On appeal, appellant’s 

attorney filed briefs in which he concludes these appeals are wholly frivolous and without merit. 

The briefs meet the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The briefs presents 

a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to 

advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 812 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978) (determining 

whether brief meets requirements of Anders). Counsel delivered a copy of the briefs to appellant. 

We advised appellant of his right to file a pro se response, but he did not file a pro se response. 
 –2– 

See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 319–21 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014) (noting appellant has right to 

file pro se response to Anders brief filed by counsel). 

 We have reviewed the record and counsel’s briefs. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 

826–27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (explaining appellate court’s duty in Anders cases). We agree the 

appeals are frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support 

these appeals. 

 We affirm the trial court’s judgments. 

Do Not Publish 

TEX. R. APP. P. 47 

171177F.U05 

 

/David L. Bridges/ 

DAVID L. BRIDGES 

JUSTICE 
 –3– 

S 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

RAYMON STEFFANI LAWRENCE, 

Appellant 

No. 05-17-01177-CR V. 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee 

 On Appeal from the 291st Judicial District 

Court, Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. F16-20873-U. 

Opinion delivered by Justice Bridges. 

Justices Brown and Whitehill participating. 

 Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is AFFIRMED. 

Judgment entered February 1, 2019. 

 
 –4– 

S 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

RAYMON STEFFANI LAWRENCE, 

Appellant 

No. 05-17-01178-CR V. 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee 

 On Appeal from the 291st Judicial District 

Court, Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. F17-00600-U. 

Opinion delivered by Justice Bridges. 

Justices Brown and Whitehill participating. 

 Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is AFFIRMED. 

Judgment entered February 1, 2019.
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential.


# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________
CANON INC., CANON U. S.A., INC., CANON VIRGINIA, INC., Appellants

v.

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION, Appellee

ASTER GRAPHICS, INC. , JIANGXI YIBO E

- TEC H COMPANY LIMITED, AST ER GRAPHICS COMPANY, LTD., NINES TAR CORPORATION, NINESTAR IMAGE TECH LIMITED, NINESTAR TECHNOLOGY COMPANY, LTD., STATIC CONTROL COMPONENTS, INC., PRINT

- RITE N.A
., INC., UNION TECHNOLO GY INTERNAT IONAL (M.C.O.) CO. LTD., P RINT

- RITE UNICORN IM AGE PRODUCTS CO. LTD.,
Intervenors

______________________

2019

- 1950

______________________
Appeal from the United States International Trade Commission in Investigation No. 337

- TA

- 1106.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________ Case: 19-1950 Document: 86 Page: 1 Filed: 04/20/2020M ICHAEL P. S ANDONATO , Venable LLP, New York, NY, argued for appellants. Also represented by S ETH B OESHORE
, D ENNIS M C M AHON
, A NDREW K UTAS ; E DMUND J OHN H AUGHEY
, III , Washington, DC.

C LINT A. G ERDINE
, Office of the General Counsel, United States International Trade Commission, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by D OMINIC L. B IANCHI
, W AYNE W. H ERRINGTON
, S IDNEY A.
R OSENZWEIG

.

N ICOLE A. S AHARSKY
, M ayer Brown LLP, Washington,DC, argued for all intervenors. Intervenors Ninestar Corporation, Ninestar Image Tech Limited, Ninestar Technology Company, Ltd., Static Control Components, Inc. also represented by G ARY H NATH
, B RYAN N ESE
, M INH N GUYEN

D ANG ; L EI M EI
, E DWARD N AIDICH , Mei & Mark LLP , Washington, DC

.

B ARBARA A. M URPHY , Foster, Murphy, Altman & Nickel, PC, Washington, DC, for intervenors Aster Graphics, Inc., Jiangxi Yibo E

- Tech Company Limited, Aster Graphics Company, Ltd. Also represented by S USAN K OEGEL

.

S TEVEN E UGENE A DKINS , McGuireWoods LLP, Washington, DC, for intervenors Print

- Rite N.A., Inc., Union Technology International (M.C.O.) Co. Ltd., Print

- Rite Unicorn Image Products Co. Ltd. Also represented by
B ENJAMIN C. H SING
, New York, NY.

______________________

T HIS C AUSE ha ving been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED : Case: 19-1950 Document: 86 Page: 2 Filed: 04/20/2020P ER C URIAM (N EWMAN
, O’M ALLEY
, and T ARANTO
, Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED. See Fed . Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

April 20, 2020
Date /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner
Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court Case: 19-1950 Document: 86 Page: 3 Filed: 04/20/2020
astra_ex1015.htm

  EXHIBIT 10.15
  
  
 LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES
  
 Astra Energy Africa - SMC Limited  
  
 Astra Energy Services Limited (owned 80% by Astra Energy Inc. and 20% by Ssingo Oils and Gas - SMC Limited of Mityana, Uganda)
  
 Astra Energy California, Inc.
  
 Astra Energy Tanzania Limited (owned 80% by Astra Energy Inc. and 20% by Kiluwa Group of Companies Limited of Kinondoni, Tanzania)