alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SCWC-20-0000036
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI # I

J A M E S J O N A T H O N D R I S C O L L a k a J A M E S J O N A T H A N D R I S C O L L , G E O R G E M
. K A I M I O L A a n d Z I L P A H K
. K A I M I O L A , Respondents/Plaintiffs-Appellees,

and
A L L E N B
. A R

A K A W A , a n d D E B B I E E
. A R A K A W A , P e t i t i o n e r s / P l a i n t i f f s - A p p e l l a n t s ,

v s . B A N K O F A

M E R I C A , N
. A
. , M O R T G A G E E L E C T R O N I C R E G I S T R A T I O N S Y S T E M S , I N C
. , G E O R G E M

A T I C , M I L E N A M

A T I C , A L E K S A N D R

A O
. M A T I C , S T E V E N M

A T I C , S I M O N T
. N G A N , J I L L S
. A
. N G A N , A M E R I C A N S A

V I N G S B A N K , F
. S
. B
. , J

A S O N C
. B A L B E R D I , N A H I N U R
. F R E I T A S , a n d T H E F E D E R

A L S A V I N G S B A N K , R e s p o n d e n t s / D e f e n d a n t s - A p p e l l e e s .

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-20-0000036; CIV. NO. 2CC191000167(1))
ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI A ND DENYING REQUEST FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, and Wilson, JJ., and Circuit Judge Wong, in place of Pollack, J., recused) Upon consideration of petitioners’ application for writ of certiorari or, in the alternative, a writ of mandamus, filed on June 3, 2020, respondents Bank of America, N.A. and Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.’s response, filed on July Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-20-0000036 03-AUG-2020 08:17 AM6, 2020, petitioners’ reply, filed on July 13, 2020, the

respective supporting documents, and the record,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the application for writ of certiorari is rejected.

IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that to the extent petitioners are seeking a writ of mandamus, their request is denied. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, August 3, 2020. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Michael D. Wilson /s/ Paul B.K. Wong

2
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460

OFFICE OF PREVENTION, PESTICIDES AND TOXIC SUBSTANCES

MEMORANDUM

Date: November 24, 2009

SUBJECT: Updated Review of Chlorpyrifos Methyl Incident Reports 

PC Code: 059102 DP Barcode: D370451

Decision No.: N/A Registration No.: N/A

Petition No.: N/A Regulatory Action: N/A

Risk Assessment Type: N/A Case No.: N/A

TXR No.: N/A CAS No.: 5598-13-0

MRID No.: N/A 40 CFR: N/A

 Ver.Apr.08

 

FROM: Monica Hawkins, Ph.D., M.P.H., Environmental Health Scientist

Toxicology and Epidemiology Branch

Health Effect Division (7509P)

THROUGH: Mary Manibusan, Branch Chief

Toxicology and Epidemiology Branch 

Health Effects Division (7509P)

Sarah Winfield, Chair

HED Incident Team

Health Effects Division (7509P)

TO: Danette Drew, Risk Assessor

Risk Assessment Branch V

Health Effects Division (7509P)

BACKGROUND

The EPA is supplying the following incident report to fulfill our requirement to docket summaries of 

incident data that were reported to the Agency, as well as to ensure human incident data are part of the 

problem formulation phase of registration review. Reports of adverse health effects allegedly due to a 

specific pesticide exposure (an “incident”) are largely self-reported and therefore, generally speaking, 

neither exposure to a pesticide or reported symptom (or the connection between the two) is validated. 
Page 2 of 2

Typically, causation cannot be determined based on incident data. However, incident information 

can be an important feedback loop to the Agency – incidents of severe outcome, or a suggested 

pattern or trend among less severe incidents can signal the Agency to further investigate a 

particular chemical or product.

The OPP Incident Data System (IDS) was consulted for poisoning incident data on the active 

ingredient chlorpyrifos methyl. The purpose of the database search is to screen for potential 

patterns on the extent and severity of the health effects attributed to chlorpyrifos methyl 

exposure. The IDS includes reports of alleged human health incidents from various sources, 

including mandatory Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) Section 6 (a) 

(2) reports from registrants, other federal and state health and environmental agencies and 

individual consumers. Since 1992, OPP compiles these reports in IDS. Reports submitted to the

IDS represent anecdotal reports or allegations only, unless otherwise stated in this report. 

The evaluation of incident data for chlorpyrifos methyl has reported 0 incidents occurring in the 

United States from 2002 to the present for the single chemical only. Because there are no

incident cases identified, there does not appear to be a risk concern at this time that would 

warrant further investigation. The Agency will continue to monitor the incident information and 

if a concern is triggered, additional analysis will be included in the risk assessment.

Cc: Veronique LaCapra, CRM, Pesticide Re-evaluation Division (7508P)
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Celso Salazar CASTILLO, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-10178

Non-Argument Calendar.

D.C. Docket No. 04-00008-CR-HL-6.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

Sept. 6, 2005.

Dean S. Daskal, U.S. Attorney’S Office, Columbus, GA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Rick D. Collum, The Collum Law Firm, P.C., Moultrie, GA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before BLACK, WILSON and PRYOR, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Rick D. Collum, appointed counsel for Celso Salazar Castillo, in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw and filed a brief pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the record reveals no issues of arguable merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Castillo’s conviction and sentence is AFFIRMED.
Case No. 14,649a.

#### UNITED STATES v. BRISTOW.

[See Case No. 3,393.]
No. 65741.

#### United China & Glass Co. *v.*United States,

protest 272150-K/14622 (New Orleans).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of decorated earthenware cups and saucers, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-02-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          57,263
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   19,471
<ALLOWANCES>                                       460
<INVENTORY>                                     14,086
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               100,351
<PP&E>                                         138,697
<DEPRECIATION>                                  62,546
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 183,694
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           22,292
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           244
<OTHER-SE>                                     158,139
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   183,694
<SALES>                                         28,019
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                28,019
<CGS>                                           17,583
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   17,583
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,307)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (958)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,349)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,349)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.10)
        

</TABLE>
UGI UTILITIES INC.
COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES  EXHIBIT 12.1
(Thousands of dollars)
 NineMonthsEndedJune 30,
    
    
    Year Ended September 30,2008
    
    
    2007
    
    
    2006
    
    
    2005
    
    
    2004
    
    
    2003Earnings:Earnings before income taxes
    
    $
    130,456
    
    
    $
    122,766
    
    
    $
    80,544
    
    
    $
    84,953
    
    
    $
    83,098
    
    
    $
    100,212Interest expense
    
    
    29,531
    
    
    
    42,327
    
    
    
    24,102
    
    
    
    18,079
    
    
    
    17,698
    
    
    
    17,412Amortization of debt discount and expense
    
    
    349
    
    
    
    462
    
    
    
    243
    
    
    
    247
    
    
    
    233
    
    
    
    244Estimated interest component of rental expense
    
    
    1,244
    
    
    
    1,506
    
    
    
    1,675
    
    
    
    1,568
    
    
    
    1,477
    
    
    
    1,434$
    161,580
    
    
    $
    167,061
    
    
    $
    106,564
    
    
    $
    104,847
    
    
    $
    102,506
    
    
    $
    119,302Fixed Charges:Interest expense
    
    $
    29,531
    
    
    $
    42,327
    
    
    $
    24,102
    
    
    $
    18,079
    
    
    $
    17,698
    
    
    $
    17,412Amortization of debt discount and expense
    
    
    349
    
    
    
    462
    
    
    
    243
    
    
    
    247
    
    
    
    233
    
    
    
    244Allowance for funds used during
construction (capitalized interest)
    
    
    110
    
    
    
    179
    
    
    
    85
    
    
    
    22
    
    
    
    11
    
    
    
    7Estimated interest component of rental expense
    
    
    1,244
    
    
    
    1,506
    
    
    
    1,675
    
    
    
    1,568
    
    
    
    1,477
    
    
    
    1,434$
    31,234
    
    
    $
    44,474
    
    
    $
    26,105
    
    
    $
    19,916
    
    
    $
    19,419
    
    
    $
    19,097Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
    
    
    5.17
    
    
    
    3.76
    
    
    
    4.08
    
    
    
    5.26
    
    
    
    5.28
    
    
    
    6.25
<PAGE>
                                          EXHIBIT EX-12


        TRANSAMERICA CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
    COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES


                                      Nine Months Ended
                                        September 30,
                                       1995        1994
                                     (Dollar amounts in
                                          millions)
Fixed charges:
  Interest and debt expense          $  535.4     $413.3
  One-third of rental expense            18.5       24.0
                                     ________     ______
    Total                            $  553.9     $437.3
                                     ========     ======
Earnings:
  Consolidated income from
    continuing operations            $  361.1     $314.3
  Provision for income taxes            169.2      182.7
  Fixed charges                         553.9      437.3
                                     ________     ______
    Total                            $1,084.2     $934.3
                                     ========     ======

Ratio of earnings from continuing
  operations to fixed charges            1.96       2.14
                                         ====       ====
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 08-1205

___________ Roger Day, M.D., * * Appellant, * * United States of America, * * Intervenor, * * v. * * State of Minnesota; Minnesota Bo ard * Appeal from the United States of Medical Practice; Steven J. * District Court for the Altchuler, M.D., PH.D.; Alfred V. * District of Minnesota. Anderson, M.D., D.C.; Hilda * Bettermann; Kelli Johnson; Jerry * [UNPUBLISHED] Kaplan; Ernest W. Lampe, II, M.D.; * Allen Rasmussen; Kris Sanda; Carl S. * Smith, M.D.; Jon V. Thomas, M.D.; * James Langland, M.D.; Barbara * Letourneau, M.D.; Bradley S. * Johnson, M.D.; Rebecca Hafner, * M.D., in their personal capacities and * in their official capacities as members * of the Minnesota Board of Medical * Practice, * * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: October 22, 2009 Filed: November 5, 2009

___________1 The Honorable Michael J. Davis, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Raymond L. Erickson, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.
2 We decline to address the sovereign immunity issue raised in the intervenor’s brief filed by the United States. -2- Before MURPHY, COLLOTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Roger J. Day, M.D., appeals the district court’s 1 judgment dismissing his claims against Minnesota, the Minnesota Board of Me dical Practice, and its members, arising out of their decision not to grant him an unrestricted medical license. Following careful review, we agree with district cour t that Day’s discrimi nation and due process claims are barred by res judicata, see St. Paul Fire and Marine Ins. Co. v. Compaq Computer Corp. , 539 F.3d 809, 821 (8th Cir. 2008) (law of forum that rendered first judgment controls res judicata analysis; Minne sota courts review application of res judicata de novo; setting forth res judicata criteria under Minnesota law), and we find no basis for reversal. 2 Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. Day’s pending motion for oral argument is denied.

______________________________
EXHIBIT 32.2








CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906


OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Unico American Corporation (the "Company") for the period ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Lester A. Aaron, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





1.
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.










/s/  Lester A. Aaron


Name:          Lester A. Aaron


Title:           Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer


Date:           November 15, 2010











A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Unico American Corporation, and will be retained by Unico American Corporation, and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
No. 54265.

#### Balfour, Guthrie & Co., Ltd., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 59686-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
Exhibit 32

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States
Code), each of the undersigned officers of Chiquita Brands International, Inc. (the company) does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 of the company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the company.

Dated: July 30, 2010



/s/ Fernando AguirreName: Fernando AguirreTitle: Chief Executive Officer


Dated: July 30,
2010



/s/ Michael B. SimsName: Michael B. SimsTitle: Chief Financial Officer
110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 340 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That in the enrollment of the bill H.R. 493 

3 (to prohibit discrimination on the basis of genetic informa4 tion with respect to health insurance and employment) the 

5 Clerk of the House of Representatives shall make the fol6 lowing technical corrections: 

7 (1) In section 104(d)— 
2 

•HCON 340 EH 

1 (A) in paragraph (2), strike ‘‘June 30, 

2 2008’’ and insert ‘‘October 31, 2008’’; 

3 (B) in paragraph (3), strike ‘‘October 1, 

4 2008’’ and insert ‘‘July 1, 2009’’; and 

5 (C) in paragraph (4)— 

6 (i) in subparagraph (A)(ii), strike 

7 ‘‘October 1, 2008’’ and insert ‘‘July 1, 

8 2009’’; and 

9 (ii) in subparagraph (B)(ii)— 

10 (I) strike ‘‘in 2008’’ and insert 

11 ‘‘in 2009’’; and 

12 (II) strike ‘‘July 1, 2008’’ and 

13 insert ‘‘July 1, 2009’’. 

14 (2) In section 202(b)(6), strike ‘‘law enforce15 ment’’ and all that follows through ‘‘and requests’’ 

16 and insert ‘‘law enforcement purposes as a forensic 

17 laboratory or for purposes of human remains identi18 fication, and requests’’. 

19 (3) In section 205(b)(6), strike ‘‘law enforce20 ment’’ and all that follows through ‘‘and requests’’ 

21 and insert ‘‘law enforcement purposes as a forensic 
3 

•HCON 340 EH 

1 laboratory or for purposes of human remains identi2 fication, and requests’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives May 1, 2008. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 340 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

To make technical corrections in the enrollment of 

the bill H. R. 493.
### Geology of the Big Snowy Mountains, Montana

By: Frank Reeves

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp165D

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
-                                 Larger Work: This publication is Chapter                                D of                                                                              Shorter contributions to general geology, 1930                                                                    
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
No. 50668.

#### Protests 54969-K, etc., of Wilson *&*Co. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and the cited decision, the following allowances were made to compensate for the weight of the inedible substance on the outside of the cheese: (1) 2)4 percent for cheese similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Scaramelli*v. *United States*(9 Cust. Ct. 270, C. D. 706); and (2) 1 percent for the cheese similar to the Reg-giano cheese the subject of *Scaramelli*v. *United States, supra.*The protests were sustained to this extent. <
### Evaluation of streamflow records in Yakima River basin, Washington

By: Hallard B. Kinnison

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/cir180

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Giovanni SANCHEZ-HERRERA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 04-10149.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 1, 2005.*

Decided Aug. 4, 2005.

Timothy S. Vasquez, AUSA, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Las Vegas, NV, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

John P. Mcnicholas, Esq., Las Vegas, NV, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, CALLAHAN, and BEA, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Giovanni Sanchez-Herrera appeals his conviction and the 195-month sentence imposed after his guilty plea to conspiracy to distribute a controlled substance, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846, 841(a)(1) and *59(b)(l)(A)(viii), and carrying *of*a firearm in relation of a drug trafficking crime, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)(A).

Pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Sanchez-Herrera has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Sanchez-Herrera filed a pro se supplemental brief.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to *Penson v. Ohio,*488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no grounds for relief.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and, in light of the valid appeal waiver contained in the plea agreement, this appeal is DISMISSED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the *59courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.