Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 87 / Monday, May 7, 2007 / Notices 25777 

1The record is defined in § 207.2(f) of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 

CFR 207.2(f)). 

(‘‘ID’’) finding no violation of Section 

337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 

**1337) with regard to the abovecaptioned investigation. On review, the 

Commission has determined to take no 

position on the ALJ’s findings 

concerning the economic prong of the 

domestic industry requirement. 

Accordingly, the Commission has 

terminated the investigation with a 

finding of no violation of Section 337. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Christal A. Sheppard, Esq., Office of the 

General Counsel, U.S. International 

Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., 

Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 

708–2301. Copies of non-confidential 

documents filed in connection with this 

investigation are or will be available for 

inspection during official business 

hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the 

Office of the Secretary, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, 500 E 

Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, 

telephone (202) 205–2000. General 

information concerning the Commission 

may also be obtained by accessing its 

Internet server at http://www.usitc.gov. 

The public record for this investigation 

may be viewed on the Commission’s 

electronic docket (EDIS) at http:// 

edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired 

persons are advised that information on 

this matter can be obtained by 

contacting the Commission’s TDD 

terminal on (202) 205–1810. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This 

investigation was instituted on February 

7, 2006, based on a complaint filed by 

Solomon Technologies, Inc., of Tarpon 

Springs, Florida (‘‘Solomon’’). The 

complaint, as amended, alleged 

violations of Section 337 of the Tariff 

Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1337) in the 

importation into the United States, the 

sale for importation, and the sale within 

the United States after importation of 

certain combination motor and 

transmission systems and devices used 

therein, and products containing same 

by reason of infringement of claims 1–

5, 7, 8, 10, and 12 of United States 

Patent No. 5,067,932 (‘‘the ’932 patent’’). 

71 FR 7574. Only claim 7 of the ’932 

patent was asserted against the 

respondents at the hearing. However, 

Solomon relied upon claim 1 of the 

patent-in-suit to meet the technical 

prong of the domestic industry 

requirement. The amended complaint 

named Toyota Motor Corporation of 

Japan; Toyota Motor Engineering & 

Manufacturing North America, Inc. of 

Erlanger, Kentucky; Toyota Motor 

Manufacturing Kentucky, Inc. of 

Georgetown, Kentucky; and Toyota 

Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc., of Torrance, 

California as respondents. 

On February 13, 2007, the ALJ issued 

an ID finding no violation of Section 

337 with regard to respondents’

products because he found claim 7 to be 

invalid and not infringed. Moreover, he 

found no domestic industry involving 

the asserted patent. Complainants and 

the Office of Unfair Import 

Investigations (‘‘OUII’’) each filed 

petitions for review on February 26, 

2007. Respondents filed a joint reply on 

March 5, 2007. Also on March 5, 2007, 

OUII filed a response to Solomon’s 

petition for review and Solomon filed a 

response to OUII’s petition for review. 

Having considered the petitions for 

review, the oppositions thereto, and the 

relevant portions of the record, the 

Commission has determined to review 

the ID in part. On review, the 

Commission has determined to take no 

position on the ALJ’s findings 

concerning the economic prong of the 

domestic industry requirement. The 

remainder of the ID has become the 

Commission’s final determination. See 

19 CFR 210.42(h). 

This action is taken under the 

authority of section 337 of the Tariff Act 

of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, 

and sections 210.42(c) and (h) of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, 19 CFR 210.42(c) and (h). 

Issued: April 30, 2007. 

By order of the Commission. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. E7–8621 Filed 5–4–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 731–TA–921 (Review)] 

Folding Gift Boxes From China 

Determination 

On the basis of the record 1 developed 

in the subject five-year review, the 

United States International Trade 

Commission (Commission) determines, 

pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff 

Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)) (the 

Act), that revocation of the antidumping 

duty order on folding gift boxes from 

China would be likely to lead to 

continuation or recurrence of material 

injury to an industry in the United 

States within a reasonably foreseeable 

time. 

Background 

The Commission instituted this 

review on December 1, 2006 (71 FR 

69586) and determined on March 6, 

2007 that it would conduct an expedited 

review (72 FR 13512, March 22, 2007). 

The Commission transmitted its 

determination in this review to the 

Secretary of Commerce on April 30, 

2007. The views of the Commission are 

contained in USITC Publication 3917 

(April 2007), entitled Folding Gift Boxes 

From China: Investigation No. 731–TA–

921 (Review). 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: May 1, 2007. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. E7–8623 Filed 5–4–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Inv. No. 337–TA–602] 

In the Matter of Certain GPS Devices 

and Products Containing Same; Notice 

of Investigation 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Institution of investigation 

pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a 

complaint was filed with the U.S. 

International Trade Commission on 

April 2, 2007, under section 337 of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 

U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of Global Locate, 

Inc. of San Jose, California. A letter 

supplementing the complaint was filed 

on April 18, 2007. The complaint 

alleges violations of section 337 in the 

importation into the United States, the 

sale for importation, and the sale within 

the United States after importation of 

certain GPS devices and products 

containing same by reason of 

infringement of certain claims of U.S. 

Patent Nos. 6,417,801, 6,606,346, 

6,651,000, 6,704,651, 6,937,187, and 

7,158,080. The complaint further alleges 

that an industry in the United States 

exists or is in the process of being 

established as required by subsection 

(a)(2) of section 337. 

The complainant requests that the 

Commission institute an investigation 

and, after the investigation, issue a 

permanent exclusion order and 

permanent cease and desist orders. 

ADDRESSES: The complaint and 

supplement, except for any confidential 

information contained therein, are 

available for inspection during official 

business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES