alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Commercial Mortgage  Servicing**D1050-084, 8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|--------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

Reference is hereby made tothat certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of May 1, 2016, by andamong WELLS FARGO COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES, INC., as Depositor, WELLSFARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as  Master Servicer, LNR PARTNERS, LLC,as Special Servicer, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as CertificateAdministrator, and WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee andPENTALPHA SURVEILLANCE LLC, as Operating Advisor and as Asset RepresentationsReviewer with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series2016-C34 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein nototherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 11.09 ofthis Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of CommercialMortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1. A review of the activitiesof the Master Servicer during the period from May 1, 2016 through December 31,2016 (the “Reporting Period”),  and of its performance per theAgreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and 

 

2. To the best of myknowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of itsobligations under this Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, theundersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2017.

 

 

/s/ Daniel Bober

Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President 

Wells Fargo Bank

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll go far |
|------------------------|------------------------------------|
Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. 

### FAA- Directorate Identifier : 

### -AD



### {(vou make changes to the values in the table below. you IIIllS! 

### ens llf"< ! the totals upda!e a cco rdingly 

### {!' rhev do not click (m· 

### Tab J 

### into and then out o{rhe charwed cell
.**~** ' / .**~** Estimated Costs: Action Costs per Product (e
. g ., aircraft , engine , (e.g., In spection , propeller, appliance) Work-hours Labor Parts Cost Total Costs Number of Total Cost replacement) (include cost (labor + 

## u.s. for U.S. Fleet 

### Do not includ e oncondition costs here access, testing , (@$85 /h parts) Registered and close-up) our) Products 

### Inspect 4 .5 $0 

### 668 

# " ') ()I () f(J 

### r Ot'
'I {)! { ,1(1 I' ( ,() I IJI I '•( lfH t' I\ (' l '· "I 1 I l(t {)(

tll IJ (l(l (' 

### ,,, I ;,1 

### ., (;() 

### ,, •' I )I { (if} I' 

### no i I' I I IJI) I

f•fl l l ' I O(l I .f• 1 tll t ()(, I ( II I HI Ill E II I II (.I ' ')I 1) (' II 

## ,, il 'I I 'J(\ r •I /J • •ft f, I 0
I If (I 1/

The known number of products in comp li ance: Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $255,510 Costs covered under warranty 

### (if known) $
On-Condition Costs:

# ~ Action Work-hours Labor cost Parts Cost Cost per Product (e
. g., Inspection , (include access , (@$85 /hour) testing , and c loserep lacement) up) 

### rear sparupper cap 368 32440.00 '' 

### splice repair rear spar upper cap 368.0 ' 

### 60222.00 replacement 

## ''" ',( (II



### 6

### Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use thisfi eld to ex plain an y thing in th e Estimate d Co st s table that was ass um e d or mi g ht not b e obv io us. This fi eld can a ls o b e use d to ex plain warranty cost s) : 

### Executive Order 12866: Could the AD be considered a " significant regulatory action " ?

# ~ *Explanation: 

### DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures: ls the AD significant?

# ·

* Explanation: 

### Regulatory Flexibility Act: YES * D**NO~**



### YES* 

# D NO 

### [8]

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for either a Yes or No answer. - YESD**NO~** 

### Explanation: 

### Intrastate Aviation in Alaska: This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska
. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the onl y mode of transportation?

# ~ YES * 

# D NO 

### [8] *Explanation:



### 7
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Rick RUSHING, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 03-30495.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 12, 2005.*

Decided Sept. 19, 2005.

*864James Oesterle, Esq., Anchorage, AK, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Mary C. Geddes, Esq., Anchorage, AK, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: REINHARDT, RYMER, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Rick Rushing appeals the 57-month sentence imposed on remand from this court following his jury conviction for violating the Clean Air Act and Clean Water Act, and obstructing proceedings before Department and Agencies in violation of 42 U.S.C. §§ 7412(f)(4), (h) and 7413(c)(1), 33 U.S.C. §§ 1311(a) and 1319(c)(2)(A), and 18 U.S.C. § 1505. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291.

We remand the sentence for further proceedings consistent with *United States v. Ameline,*409 F.3d 1073, 1084-85 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc).

REMANDED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 83 (Tuesday, May 1, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 23809]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-8214]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket Nos. ER07-656-000 and ER07-656-001]


CMT Fund IX, LLC; Notice of Issuance of Order

April 24, 2007.
    CMT Fund IX, LLC (CMT) filed an application for market-based rate 
authority, with an accompanying rate schedule. The proposed market-
based rate schedule provides for the sale of energy at market-based 
rates. CMT also requested waivers of various Commission regulations. In 
particular, CMT requested that the Commission grant blanket approval 
under 18 CFR part 34 of all future issuances of securities and 
assumptions of liability by CMT.
    On April 20, 2007, pursuant to delegated authority, the Director, 
Division of Tariffs and Market Development--West, granted the requests 
for blanket approval under part 34 (Director's Order). The Director's 
Order also stated that the Commission would publish a separate notice 
in the Federal Register establishing a period of time for the filing of 
protests. Accordingly, any person desiring to be heard concerning the 
blanket approvals of issuances of securities or assumptions of 
liability by CMT should file a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure. 18 CFR 385.211, 385.214 (2004).
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests is May 
21, 2007.
    Absent a request to be heard in opposition to such blanket 
approvals by the deadline above, CMT is authorized to issue securities 
and assume obligations or liabilities as a guarantor, indorser, surety, 
or otherwise in respect of any security of another person; provided 
that such issuance or assumption is for some lawful object within the 
corporate purposes of CMT, compatible with the public interest, and is 
reasonably necessary or appropriate for such purposes.
    The Commission reserves the right to require a further showing that 
neither public nor private interests will be adversely affected by 
continued approvals of CMT's issuance of securities or assumptions of 
liability.
    Copies of the full text of the Director's Order are available from 
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426. The Order may also be viewed on the Commission's 
Web site at http://www.ferc.gov, using the eLibrary link. Enter the 
docket number excluding the last three digits in the docket number 
filed to access the document. Comments, protests, and interventions may 
be filed electronically via the Internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web site 
under the ``e-Filing'' link. The Commission strongly encourages 
electronic filings.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-8214 Filed 4-30-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
/^gW^ ^^i::^. . THE SECRET7\RY OF TRANSPORTATION -:;jSJ!-p|]J.QF 

^^^Wi^ ~ WASHINGTON, D.C. 20590 :-f^^^llAlK/i;! 

Septembe r 09 , 2011 i -r j - >, .-. _,^ 

The Honorable Kay Bailey Hutchison 

United States Senate 

Washington, DC 20510 

Dear Senator Hutchison: 

Thank you for your letter supporting the proposal submitted by the Abilene Regional Airport for 

a grant under the Small Community Air Sen'ice Development Program. 

The Small Community Program was established to help smaller communities address air service 

deficiencies, particularly issues related to high airfares and insufficient service. Under the 

statute, the U.S. Department of Transportation may make a maximum of 40 grant awards each 

year, although no more than 4 may be to communities in the same State. In order to provide 

communities with latitude in developing solutions to their air service deficiencies, the statute 

allows significant flexibility in how the financial assistance may be used. 

On July 1, the Department issued an order requesting that communities interested in receiving a 

grant this year file their applications by August 2. As these grant requests are pending before the 

Department, 1 am sure you understand that I cannot comment on the merits of any particular 

proposal. 1 can assure you, however, that the Department will give full consideration to all 

proposals that have been properly filed. 

As is our normal practice, I am placing a copy of your letter and this response in Docket 

DOT-OST-201 i -0119 as a contact outside tluf^ord of this matter. (appreciate your interest in 

this program. If 1 can provide furUjlwimoflmi^n or assistance, please feeyfrab to call me. 
SI 0-110801-022 

KAY BAILEY HUTCHISON COMWITOES: 

'^^f^ APPROfHIATIONS 

COMMERCE. SCIEMCE. 

AND reANSCOHTAriON 

IHnittd States Senate 

WASHINGTON, DC 205!0-4304 

RULES AND ADMtf4!STfiATtON 

July 20,201 

The Honorable Ray LaHood 

Secretary 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

Dear Secretary LaHood: 

The Abilene Regional Airport has notified me that it has submitted an application 

to be considered for the Small Community Air Service Development Grant. I am pleased 

to support the application. 

I am requesting the Department of Transportation to carefully consider the merits 

of the grant proposal and ensure it receives a fair and thorough review during tlie 

evaluation process. Abilene Regional Airport has informed me of the positive impact this 

grant will have in the community by creating jobs, increasing competition which would 

benefit consumers, and improving the transportation infrastructure in the region. 

Should you have any questions regarding the grant application, I hope you will 

not hesitate to contact Lucas Szabo in my office for additional information. 

Sincerely. 

KBH/ls 

Wab-hltp-'/hulchlson.sraiiite.gov
KEVIN KASPER

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 16

- 2716

_____________ ________________/

Opinion filed May 5, 2017.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Alachua County

. James M. Colaw , Judge

.

Jesse Smith and Rodney W. Smith of Avera & Smith LLP, Gainesville , for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Sharon S. Tra xler, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

B.L. THOMAS

, RAY

, and KELSEY

, J J

. , CONCUR.
# C_2018328EN.01004701.xml

| 17.9.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 328/47 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.9.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 328/47

---

Order of the General Court of 10 July 2018 — Izba Gospodarcza Producentów i Operatorów Urządzeń Rozrywkowych v Commission

(Case T-514/15) (1)

((Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Request for access to detailed opinions issued in the course of a notification procedure under Directive 98/34/EC - Documents relating to an infringement procedure - Refusal to grant access - Disclosure after the action was brought - No need to adjudicate))

(2018/C 328/63)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Izba Gospodarcza Producentów i Operatorów Urządzeń Rozrywkowych (Warsaw, Poland) (represented by P. Hoffman, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by F. Clotuche-Duvieusart and M. Konstantinidis, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the applicant: Kingdom of Sweden (represented by C. Meyer-Seitz, A. Falk, U. Persson, N. Otte Widgren, E. Karlsson and L. Swedenborg, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: Republic of Poland (represented by B. Majczyna, M. Kamejsza-Kozłowska and B. Paziewska, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action pursuant to Article 263 TFEU for annulment of the Commission Decisions GESTDEM 2015/1291 of 12 June 2015 and of 17 July 2015 refusing to grant the applicant access to the detailed opinions delivered, respectively, by the Commission and the Republic of Malta in the course of notification procedure 2014/537/PL.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

| 2. | Izba Gospodarcza Producentów i Operatorów Urządzeń Rozrywkowych and the European Commission shall bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Izba Gospodarcza Producentów i Operatorów Urządzeń Rozrywkowych and the European Commission shall bear their own costs.

| 3. | The Kingdom of Sweden and the Republic of Poland shall bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The Kingdom of Sweden and the Republic of Poland shall bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 371, 9.11.2015.

---
Go

Home National International Regional Industry Interactive Data About BEA

Contact Us FAQs

National Data

National Data Industry Data

International Data Regional Data

GDP & Personal Income Fixed Assets GDP-by-industry Input-Output

Int'l Transactions, Services, & IIP Direct Investment & MNEs GDP & Personal Income

Sign In Register Help

GDP & Personal Income

BEA’s national economic accounts provide a comprehensive picture of the U.S. economy and

feature many macroeconomic statistics.

Begin using the data...

Citing BEA Information

...includes:

Gross domestic product (GDP)

Gross domestic income (GDI)

National income

Corporate profits

Government receipts and expenditures

Personal income and disposable personal income

Personal consumption expenditures (PCE), or consumer spending

Personal saving

Additional information

NIPA source data and methodologies

Supplemental Estimates

Guide to the Numbering of the NIPA Tables (PDF)

SCB, August 2003

Access Underlying Detail tables

Million Dollar NIPA tables

U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) http://www.bea.gov/iTable/index_nipa.cfm

1 of 2 8/31/2015 8:01 AM
Contact Us

Frequently Asked

Questions

About BEA

Policies

Privacy Policy

Accessibility

Information Quality

Guidelines

Data Dissemination Practices

Open Data

ESR System

USA.gov

COMMERCE.gov

U.S. Economic Accounts

National

International

Regional

Industry

News

U.S. Economy at a Glance

Current Releases

News Release Archive

Information For...

Media

Congressional Users

eFile Users

Job Seekers

Publications

Survey of Current Business

Papers by Topic

BEA Customer Guide

Resources

Interactive Data

Research at BEA

FAQs

More

Director's Page

Conferences

Select NIPA Tables (PDF)

Updates

U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) http://www.bea.gov/iTable/index_nipa.cfm

2 of 2 8/31/2015 8:01 AM
sDSUNITEDSTATESENVIRONMENTALPROTECTIONAGENCYREGIONIX75HawthorneStreetSanFrancisco,CA94105-3901AUG102012DearMembersoftheArizonaBusinessCommunity:ThankyouforyourinterestinArizona’splantoaddressregionalhazeinprotectednationalparksandwildernessareasasrequiredundertheCleanAirAct(CAA).WearerespondingtoyourletterdatedJuly23,2012,requestinganextensionofthepubliccommentperiodandadditionalhearings.WeagreetoextendthedeadlineforpubliccommentandincreasethenumberofpublichearingstoprovideadditionalopportunityforreviewandcommentontheregionalhazeplanforthreepowerplantsinArizona(ApacheGeneratingStation,ChollaPowerPlantandCoronadoGeneratingStation.)Wewillconducttwoadditionalpublichearings.OnAugust14,2012,wewillholdanadditionalhearinginHolbrook,ArizonaatHolbrookHighSchool,GeorgeGardnerPerformingArtsCenter,455N.8thAve.from6-8PM.NotethatEPAhaschangedthelocationfromNorthlandPioneerCollegeinordertoaccommodatemorepeople.OnAugust15,2012,wewillholdahearinginBenson,Arizona,atCochiseCollege(Rooms113and115)from6-8PM.ThesetwohearingsareinadditiontothepublichearingheldinPhoenixonJuly31,2012.Wehaveextendedthepubliccommentperiodbytwoweeks,foratotalof60daysendingonSeptember18,2012,butareunabletoprovidethe90daysthatyourequested.WeareonanexpeditedscheduletoreviewandrespondtoallpubliccommentsandtoprepareafinaldeterminationbytheconsentdecreedeadlineofNovember15,2012.Wedidrequestmoretimefromthelitigantsbutwereunsuccessful.Welookforwardtoworkingwithyouandotherinterestedpartiestoaddressregionalhazeaffectingnationalparksandwildernessareas.Ifyouhavefurtherquestions,pleasecontactColleenMcKaughan,AssociateDirector,at520-498-0118.Sincerely,1ebahJordanDirector,AirDivisionPrintedonRecycledPaper
Exhibit 32.1








Certification








Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63


of Title 18, United States Code)





Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.  1350), the undersigned officer of SonomaWest Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify that:





The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 (the “Form 10-Q”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated: May 17, 2010











/s/ Walker R. Stapleton


Walker R. Stapleton,


Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer








A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to SonomaWest Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by SonomaWest Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 35.6  LOGO

Commercial Mortgage Servicing
D1050-084, 8th Fl 401 South
Tryon Street Charlotte, NC 28202
1-800-326-1334 ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of February 1, 2016, by and among CITIGROUP COMMERCIAL
MORTGAGE SECURITIES INC, as Depositor, KEYBANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Special Servicer, PENTALPHA SURVEILLANCE LLC, as Operating Advisor and Asset Representations Reviewer, WELLS FARGO
BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator, and WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2016-GC36 (the Agreement). Capitalized terms used
herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement. Pursuant to Section 10.08 of this Agreement, I, Dan
Marthinsen, Managing Director of Special Servicing do hereby certify that:  1.
A review of the activities of the Special Servicer during the period from January 1, 2018 through December 31,
2018 (the Reporting Period), and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and  2.
To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Special Servicer, has fulfilled all of its obligations
under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has
executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2019.  LOGODaniel Marthinsen, Managing DirectorWells Fargo Bank  Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.



LOGO
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Corporate Trust Services**

  MAC R1204-010  9062 Old Annapolis Road  Columbia, MD 21045  Tel: 410 884 2000  Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

CCRE Commercial MortgageSecurities, L.P. 

110 E 59TH ST

NEW YORK, New York10022-1304

 

 

RE: Annual Statement ofCompliance for CFCRE 2016-C3 Mortgage Trust Commercial Mortgage Pass-ThroughCertificates, Series 2016-C3

 

Per the Pooling and ServicingAgreement dated as of January 1, 2016 (the "Agreement"), theundersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., asCertificate Administrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies asfollows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2016 (the "ReportingPeriod"):

 

(a)           A review of Wells Fargo's activities during the Reporting Period and of itsperformance under the Agreement has been made under such officer's supervision;and

 

(b)          To the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo hasfulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respectsthroughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

February 27, 2017

 

 

 

/s/ Brian Smith

BRIAN SMITH

Vice President

 

 

 

/s/ Jeffrey Coletta 

Jeffrey Coletta

Assistant Secretary 

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |   |
|------------------------|--------|
No. 46370.

#### Protest 974538-G of L. Bocci & Sons (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

At the trial the plaintiffs testified that they had examined and checked each of the 19 cases of tiles upon arrival and found 1,200 full tiles *276measuring 6 x 6 x *%*inches and 350 half tiles, and that the tiles so found corresponded with the quantity ordered; that none of the tiles had been removed from the shipment before being received by them, as the 19 cases were completely filled. The inspector who examined the shipment testified that he had received a permit of delivery noting that the shipment contained 1,550 tiles, no mention having been made of half tiles; that he had opened 2 or 3 cases out of the 19 cases, and that they contained tiles measuring 6 x 6 x *%*inches. From a careful consideration of the record the court was of the opinion that the weight of the evidence established without contradiction that the merchandise contained 1,200 whole tiles and 350 half tiles, having a measurement of 343.9 superficial feet, as claimed by the importers. The collector was therefore directed to make refund accordingly.