alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OF****THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Suzanne Cope, President and Chief Executive Officer of Deseo Swimwear Inc., hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

| 1.              | the annual report on Form 10-K/A of Deseo Swimwear Inc. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                        |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      |
| 2.                                                                          | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Deseo Swimwear Inc.                                                                               |

 

|                          | **Deseo Swimwear Inc.** |                                                                                                                          |
|--------------------------|-------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                     |                    |                                                                                                                          |   |
| Dated: December 21, 2020 | By:                     | */s/ Suzanne Cope*                                                                                                            |   |
|                     |                    | Suzanne Cope

President and Director

Principal Executive Officer 

Principal Financial Officer

Principal Accounting Officer |   |
| (logo) WELLS  FARGO | **Commercial  Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084,  8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|---------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

 

Reference is hereby made to that certainTrust and Servicing Agreement dated as of April 29, 2016, by and among J.P.Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp., as Depositor, Wells FargoBank, National Association, as Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, NationalAssociation, as Special Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, asCertificate Administrator and Wilmington Trust, National Association, asTrustee with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series2016-PLSD (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein nototherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section13.7 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Marthinsen, Managing Director of SpecialServicing do hereby certify that:

 

1.          Areview of the activities of the Special Servicer during the period from January1, 2018 through December 31, 2018 (the “Reporting Period”), and of itsperformance per the Agreement during such period has been made under mysupervision, and

 

2.         Tothe best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Special Servicer hasfulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respectsthroughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned hasexecuted this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2019.

 

 

/s/ Daniel Marthinsen

Daniel Marthinsen, Managing Director

Wells Fargo Bank

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank,  N.A. | (logo) Together  we’ll go far |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 294 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 294

  Expressing the sense of Congress that the Secretary of Defense take 
  immediate steps to appoint doctors of chiropractic as commissioned 
                     officers in the Armed Forces.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 13, 2008

Mr. Abercrombie (for himself, Mr. Paul, Mr. Brady of Pennsylvania, and 
 Mrs. Drake) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
  Expressing the sense of Congress that the Secretary of Defense take 
  immediate steps to appoint doctors of chiropractic as commissioned 
                     officers in the Armed Forces.

Whereas the Secretary of Defense has statutory authority under section 3070 of 
        title 10 of the United States Code to appoint doctors of chiropractic as 
        commissioned officers in the Armed Forces, but has not yet made such 
        appointments;
Whereas the urgent needs of military personnel in the field of operations 
        include access to the widest possible range of health care options, 
        especially in the area of care of the spine and related structures of 
        the body;
Whereas providing military personnel in the field of operations with access to 
        chiropractic care will increase the cost effectiveness of military 
        health care expenditures by taking advantage of the conservative, 
        drugless, and non-surgical care option offered by chiropractic care;
Whereas back injuries are the leading cause of lost service time and disability 
        in the Armed Forces;
Whereas military personnel in the field of operations or on shipboard can access 
        chiropractic care only through commissioned chiropractic officers;
Whereas access to chiropractic care through commissioned chiropractic officers 
        will enhance the combat readiness of military personnel by offering a 
        non-pharmaceutical option for the health care needs of such personnel; 
        and
Whereas the appointment of doctors of chiropractic as commissioned offices will 
        make use of a highly skilled and trained pool of health care 
        professionals and help to meet the growing demand for chiropractic care 
        in the Armed Forces: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of Congress that the Secretary of Defense should 
take immediate steps to establish a career path for doctors of 
chiropractic to be appointed as commissioned officers in all branches 
of the Armed Forces for purposes of providing chiropractic services to 
members of the Armed Forces.
                                 <all>
```
img125361817_0.jpg











Annual Statement as to Compliance

For the Year Ended December 31, 2023 (the “Reporting Period”)



Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc., Series 2016-GC37



Pursuant to Section 3.01 (32) of the Subservicing Agreement governing the referenced transaction (the “Servicing Agreement”), I hereby attest that:



i. A review of the activities and performance of Berkadia as Subservicer during the (reporting period) period, has been made under my supervision.




ii. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, Berkadia as Subservicer has fulfilled, in all material respects, its obligations under this Subservicing Agreement throughout the period and no default by the Subservicer under the Subservicing Agreement has occurred and is continuing.




Berkadia,

img125361817_1.jpg



Mark E. McCool

President

February 10, 2024









Inv. 823 Lib. A




---
No. 50688.

#### Protest 976556-G of Mutual Supply Co. (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise is similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Mutual Supply Co. v. United States*(12 Cust. Ct. 136, C. D. 842), the claim at 25 percent under paragraph 775 was sustained.
# C_2016410EN.01001402.xml

| 7.11.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 410/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.11.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 410/14

---

Judgment of the General Court of 22 September 2016 — Łabowicz v EUIPO — Pure Fishing (NANO)

(Case T-237/15) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU figurative mark NANO - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptiveness - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Article 52(1) and (2) of Regulation No 207/2009))

(2016/C 410/18)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Edward Łabowicz (Kłodzko, Poland) (represented by: M. Żygadło, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: L. Rampini, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Pure Fishing, Inc. (Spirit Lake, Iowa, United States) (represented by: J. Dickerson, Solicitor)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 5 March 2015 (Case R 2426/2013-1), relating to invalidity proceedings between Pure Fishing and Mr Łabowicz

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Mr Edward Łabowicz to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Edward Łabowicz to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 228, 13.7.2015.

1

---
February 26, 1970

No. 70-2

#### Kenneth A. Christie, PVT, U. S. Marine Corps v United States.

Petitioner has submitted a Petition for Appropriate Extraordinary Relief. He therein represents that on June 10, 1969, a general court-martial convened in Vietnam convicted him of two offenses and imposed a sentence of confinement at hard labor for one year, total forfeitures and reduction to Private E-l. Despite the failure of the convening authority to act upon the record of his trial, petitioner was transferred to the Naval Disciplinary Command, Portsmouth, New Hampshire. He sought appropriate relief from the extraordinary delay by the convening authority.

In response to our Order to Show Cause, respondent has established that the convening authority had approved only so much of the sentence as provides for confinement at hard labor for nine months and reduction to Private E-l; that on the day following our Order this sentence was affirmed after examination in the Office of the Judge Advocate General of the Navy, and petitioner was restored to duty.

Accordingly, it appearing that the issue presented by the Petition is now moot (see also United States v Snyder, 18 USCMA 480 (1969)), it is, by the Court, this 26th day of February, 1970.

ORDERED:

That said Petition be, and the same is, hereby dismissed.
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Commercial Mortgage  Servicing**D1050-084, 8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|--------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

 

Reference is hereby made to thatcertain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of November 1, 2015, by andamong DEUTSCHE MORTGAGE & ASSET RECEIVING CORPORATION, as Depositor, WELLSFARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, LNR PARTNERS, LLC, asSpecial Servicer, WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, WELLSFARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator, Paying Agentand Custodian, and PARK BRIDGE LENDER SERVICES LLC, as Operating Advisor withrespect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, COMM 2015-LC23 (the"Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise definedshall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 10.11 ofthis Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial MortgageServices do hereby certify that:

 

1. A review of the activitiesof the Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2016 through December31, 2016 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance per theAgreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and

 

2. To the best of myknowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of itsobligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersignedhas executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2017.

 

 

/s/ Daniel Bober

Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President

Wells Fargo Bank

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll  go far |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------|
EPA TOWN HALL MEETING. July 30, 2014 

My name is Katherine Mitchell; I am from Atlanta, Ga. It is imperative that 

we combat climate change, which is a reality, and control emissions from 

current power plants. The EPA needs much more stringent regulations. We 

must reduce emissions from electrical power, which comprise nearly 40% 

of the country's emissions. 

If we do not combat global warming, it will have cataclysmic effects. It will 

ricochet through the economy, for the long term as well as short term; it will 

effect our health and well-being, our air quality, our food supply, our way of 

life. The battle against climate change is a battle we can win, but not if we 

continue to delay. We need clean, renewable sources of energy. The 

technologies exist; they must be implemented. 

I respectfully request that the EPA make four major changes to the 

proposed rule. 

First, there should be more stringent emission reductions, particularly from 

coal-fired plants. 

Second, in addition to being more strict, the implementation of these 

regulations should be sooner. Time is of the essence in this struggle. 

Third, it is a mistake to encourage the use of natural gas as more than a 

transitional fuel as we convert to clean sustainable energy sources. 

Natural gas is not a clean fuel; it does release methane into the 

environment. Our time and effort should go into the development of 

sustainable, non-fossil sources like solar. 

Fourth, I request that the EPA encourage all states heavily reliant on coal 

(such as Georgia) to increase the proportion of energy from renewable 

sources such as solar and wind. I am aware that Nuclear energy also 

brings with it significant problems. Not least is that there is no known way 

to safely dispose of spent fuel rods. These highly radioactive rods will 

present major problems for future generations. I would also prefer that we 

move away from the mining of uranium. 
In the past, the world has often looked to the USA for leadership. We have 

a chance to be leaders in the move to clean, sustainable energy. There is 

no downside to our making these changes. Our future hangs in the 

balance. 

Thank you for your consideration of my comments. 

Katherine Mitchell 

I , '\ ( i . ' I . ~- -{ I. 1 ••c I \ ) \ ) l< ~- L\ f \ \ ·< \.. \ I- !. \ ' l /" _;__
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v ROSARIO VAZQUEZ-DAVILA, Sergeant, U. S. Army, Appellant

12 USCMA 550, 31 CMR 136

No. 15,140

November 24, 1961

*Captain Samuel J. Rozel*argued the cause for Appellant, Accused. With him on the brief was *Colonel W. H. Blaclcmarr.*

*First Lieutenant Alvin B. Fox*argued the cause for Appellee, United States. With him on the brief were *Lieutenant Colonel James G. Mc-Conaughy, Major Francis M. Cooper,*and *First Lieutenant Jerome Nelson.*

Opinion of the Court

Quinn, Chief Judge:

This case presents the same issue as United States v Forwerck, 12 USCMA 540, 31 CMR 126. For the reasons set out in the opinion in that case, the decision of the board of review is affirmed.

Judge Kilday concurs.

FERGUSON, Judge

(dissenting):

I dissent for the reasons set forth in my separate opinion in United States v Forwerck, 12 USCMA 540, 31 CMR 126, this day decided.
DENY and Opinion Filed March 8 , 2024

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05
- 24
- 00238
- CV IN RE R. STEPHEN POL LEY , Relator Original Proceeding from the 44th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC
- 20
- 13077 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Partida

- Kipness, Nowell, and Miskel

Opinion by Justice Nowell On the Court’s own motion, we withdraw our memorandum opinion and
vacate our or der dated March 6, 2024 , and we issue this new memorandum opinion and order in their stead . The following is now the opinion of the Court. Before the Court are relator’s March 4, 2024 petition for writ of mandamus and motion for temporary relief. In his p etition, relator seeks mandamus relief from the trial court’s February 26, 2024 order (1) declining to allow relator to supersede the injunctive relief included in the final judgment and (2) requiring real party in interest to post security instead.– 2

–

Enti tlement to mandamus relief requires relator to demonstrate that the trial court clearly abused its discretion and that he lack s an adequate remedy by appeal

. In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am. , 148 S.W.3d 124, 135

– 36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding)

. After reviewing the petition and the record, we conclude that relator’s remedy was to file a motion under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 24.4. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 24.4(a)(4) (providing that a party may, by motion filed in the appe llate
court , seek revi ew of a trial court’s exercise of discretion under Rule 24.2(a)(3) ). Accordingly , we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 52.8(a) ; see also In re Bittinger , No. 14

- 10

- 00697

- CV, 2010 WL 3310208, at *1 (Tex. App.

— Houston [14th Dist.] Aug. 23, 2010 , orig. proceeding ) (mem. op.) (denying mandamus petition because relator’s remedy was to file Rule 24.4 motion in the pending appeal). Having denied the petition, we also deny as moot the motion for temporary relief.

240238f.p05 /Erin A. Nowell/ / ERIN A. NOWELL JUSTIC E
#### A. Newberg & Co. *v.*United States

No. 6099.

Invoices dated Sonneberg, Germany, April 24, 1938, etc.

Certified April 27, 1938, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., May 9, 1938, etc.

Entry No. 850848, etc.

(Decided February 12, 1945)

*Strauss & Hedges (Hadley S. King*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General *(Daniel I. Auster,*special attorney), for the defendant.

Oliver, Presiding Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between counsel for the respective parties "hereto, subject to the approval of the court, that the facts and circumstances relating to the item of 10 per centum, commission or 8 per centum commission in the above-entitled cases, identified on the invoice with the letter “A” and the- initials WRS or DL of Examiner W. R. Shapiro or-D. Lefkovitz are in all material respects the same as the facts and circumstances relating to the item of commission specified in the invoices relating to glass tree ornaments, novelties, .and figures, passed upon by the United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals in *United States*v. *S. S. Kresge Co. et al.,*26 C. C. P. A. 349, 352, wherein the court held that “A purchasing commission, charged for the handling of the merchandise, is not a proper part of the dutiable value.”

> It is further stipulated and agreed that on the date of exportation of the merchandise involved in the above-entitled cases and identified on the invoices with "the letter “A” in green ink and initials DL or WRS of examiner D. Lefkovitz or *334W. R. Shapiro, articles such and similar thereto were freely offered for sale and sold to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country of exportation, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States at the *per se*unit invoice prices plus 3% per centum social assessments for insurance, vacation, and holiday costs, plus packing, as invoiced, and that there was no higher foreign value.

> That the instant appeals to reappraisement are abandoned as to all items not marked “A” and initialed aforesaid.

> It is further stipulated and agreed that the record in *United States*v. *S. S. Kresge Co. et al.,*26 C. C. P. A. 349, 352, be incorporated herein, and that the instant appeals to reappraisement are submitted on this stipulation.

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for. the determination of the value of the merchandise represented on the invoices by the items marked with the letter *“A”*in green inis and the initials DL or WRS of Examiner D. Lefkovitz or W. R. Shapiro, and that such values are the *per se*unit invoice prices, plus 3K per centum social assessments for insurance, vacation, and holiday costs, plus pacldng, as invoiced.

The appeals having been abandoned insofar as they relate to all other merchandise; to that extent the appeals are hereby dismissed.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
(Reap. Dec. 8852)

#### Hudson Shipping Co., Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 723571.

(Decided June 20, 1957)

*Barnes, Richardson & Colhurn*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Mollison, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the attorneys for the parties hereto

> That the instant appeal for reappraisement covers various second-hand articles imported from France.

> That on or about the date of exportation the price at which Items 4871, 4872, 4873, 4875, 4876, 4874, 4878 and 4877 were freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal market of France, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade for exportation to the United States was the invoice unit prices plus 10% plus packing as invoiced.

> That on or about the date of exportation the prices at which the balance of the items covered by the instant appeal for reappraisement and entry were freely offered for sale to all purchasers, in the principal market of France, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade for exportation to the United States was the invoice unit prices plus packing as invoiced.

> That on or about the date of exportation the market value or the price at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale for home consumption in France was no higher.

> That the instant appeal for reappraisement be submitted on this stipulation.

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values were as follows:

As to items 4871, 4872, 4873, 4875, 4876, 4874, 4878, and 4877, the invoice unit prices, plus 10 per centum, plus packing, as invoiced.

As to the balance of the items involved, the invoice unit prices, plus packing, as invoiced.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.