alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 239 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 27 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 17), 2008 

Received 

OCTOBER 2 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 17), 2008 

Referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Recognizing and acknowledging the important role of adoption, and commending all parties involved, including 

birthparents who carry out an adoption plan, adoptive 

families, and adopted children. 

Whereas in 2002, there were 22,291 domestic infant adoptions in the United States; 

Whereas birthparents who decide to carry out an adoption 

plan come from all walks of life, with various backgrounds and socioeconomic status; 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

HCON 239 RFS 

Whereas birthparents who carry out an adoption plan should 

be recognized and commended for doing what they believe 

is in the best interest of their child; 

Whereas loving, nurturing adoptive families make it possible 

for birthparents to carry out an adoption plan; 

Whereas adoptive families make an important difference in 

the life of a child through adoption and show the compassionate spirit of our Nation; 

Whereas adoptive families should be recognized and commended for providing a permanent, safe, and loving home 

for a child; 

Whereas studies have shown that adopted children form deep 

emotional bonds with their adoptive parents indistinguishable from those biological children form with their 

parents; 

Whereas adopted children grow up to make valuable contributions to our Nation and lead fulfilling lives; 

Whereas adopted children should be recognized and commended for understanding that the choice of the 

birthparents to carry out an adoption plan may be a difficult and carefully considered decision made out of love 

for a child; and 

Whereas Congress should do more to support adoption, including birthparents who carry out an adoption plan, 

adoptive families, and adopted children: Now, therefore, 

be it 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That Congress recognizes and acknowledges 

3 the important role of adoption, and commends all parties 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
3 

HCON 239 RFS 

1 involved, including birthparents who carry out an adoption 

2 plan, adoptive families, and adopted children. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 26, 

2008. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
#### A. Palazzolo & Co. *v.*United States

No. 6089.

Invoices dated Naples, Italy, September 19, 1936, etc.

Certified September 22, 1936, etc.

Entered at Cincinnati, Ohio, October 22, 1936, etc.

Entry No. 355, etc.

*303(Decided January 29, 1945)

*Tompkins & Tompkins (J. Stuart Tompkins*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General *(Arthur R. Martoccia,*special attorney), for the defendant.

Kincheloe, Judge:

These reappraisement appeals relate to importations of tomatoes and tomato paste in tins, covered by invoices, which were consulated at Naples, Italy, in September 1936, and shipped by G. Palazzolo & Co. and Eugenio *&*Silvestro Crudele to the plaintiff in Cincinnati. In this case, and upon entry by duress certificate, the importer added in one case, $397.14, and, in the other cases, $455.66, because of advances made by appraisers in other cases, citing in its duress certificates, among others, as the then pending test case, Reappraisement 122960-A, covering New York entry 836213.

The merchandise in suit was appraised upon the basis of alleged foreign value. The importer contends in the present suit, the same as in the test suit which has been incorporated as part of the record herein (Reap. Dec. 5941), for an absence of foreign value, on the ground that there was no such or similar merchandise sold or freely offered for sale in Italy at the time of exportation, and claims that the proper dutiable values are the export values, which plaintiff contends are the appraised values in each case, less the amounts which were added under duress.

These reappraisement appeals have been submitted for decision upon stipulated facts agreed to by counsel on both sides to the effect that the tomatoes and tomato paste in tins covered by these appeals exported from Naples, Italy, by G. Palazzolo & Co. and Eugenio & Silvestro Crudele in September 1936, as also the issues involved in these appeals, are the same in all material respects as the merchandise and the issues which were passed upon in the case of *United States*v. *Luigi Vitelli Elvea, Inc., et al.,*Reap. Dec. 5941, the record in which case has been incorporated herein by consent.

Upon the stipulated facts herein and the record in the incorporated case, I find as follows:

That there was no foreign value, as that value is defined in section 402 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930;

That export value as defined in section 402 (d) was the proper basis for dutiable value;

And that such export values are the appraised values, less the amounts which were added under duress.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 13 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 13

  Expressing the sense of Congress regarding the need to prevent the 
               closure or consolidation of post offices.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 5, 2007

 Mrs. Emerson submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
      referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
  Expressing the sense of Congress regarding the need to prevent the 
               closure or consolidation of post offices.

Whereas the United States Postal Service has announced that it may consider 
        closing post offices that do not cover their costs;
Whereas the Constitution of the United States grants Congress the authority to 
        ``establish Post Offices'', recognizing that mail services are essential 
        to binding the citizenry of this Nation together;
Whereas Congress has stated, time and time again, that post offices should not 
        be closed or consolidated solely for operating at a deficit, it being 
        the intent of Congress that effective postal services be ensured for all 
        Americans, whether residing in urban, suburban, or rural communities;
Whereas many communities have only limited means of communication, and rely on 
        the post office to allow them to correspond with persons elsewhere in 
        the Nation or around the world; and
Whereas the post office is an essential institution within every community: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),  
That it is the sense of Congress that the United States Postal 
Service--
            (1) should provide a maximum degree of effective and 
        regular postal services to all communities, including rural 
        areas and small towns where post offices may not be self-
        sustaining; and
            (2) should take all necessary steps to ensure that post 
        offices are not closed or consolidated.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 254 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 254

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 18, 2007

                                Received

                           December 19, 2007

               Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
   Recognizing and celebrating the centennial of Oklahoma statehood.

Whereas on November 16, 1907, Oklahoma officially became the 46th State of the 
        Union;
Whereas prior to becoming a State, Oklahoma was designated as Indian Territory, 
        providing a vibrant history and culture that continues to enrich the 
        lives of its citizens;
Whereas the State of Oklahoma was shaped by those adventurous and daring 
        individuals who embraced the spirit of this great Nation as they opened 
        the frontier of the American West;
Whereas generations of proud people from all backgrounds have called Oklahoma 
        their home and have contributed to its spirited history;
Whereas these hearty and resilient people have defined what has come to be known 
        as the spirit of Oklahoma through their strength, character, and 
        persistent strides toward a bright future;
Whereas the continued strength, initiative, and pursuit of excellence displayed 
        by the citizens of the State of Oklahoma have produced its vibrant 
        economy and secured it as a place of opportunity and progress now and 
        for future generations;
Whereas the solid foundation of family and community embraced by the citizens of 
        Oklahoma has been a constant guide and source of strength to those 
        citizens throughout its history and will remain so long into its future;
Whereas the natural beauty and abundant resources of the State of Oklahoma 
        support a quality of life for its citizens that is unsurpassed; and
Whereas on November 16, 2007, the State of Oklahoma will begin a new century of 
        statehood: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That the Congress recognizes and celebrates the centennial of Oklahoma 
statehood and wishes its people another hundred years of continued 
growth, prosperity, and achievement.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 17, 2007.

            Attest:

                                            LORRAINE C. MILLER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Injuries and Accident Causes in Warehousing Operations: A Detailed Analysis of Injuries, Injury Rates, and Hazards for 1950, by Type of Warehouse, Region and Occupation

              																	United States. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 						*Injuries and Accident Causes in Warehousing Operations: A Detailed Analysis of Injuries, Injury Rates, and Hazards for 1950, by Type of Warehouse, Region and Occupation : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 1174*,												Washington: 								U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 										January 1955,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/4478,			accessed on September 25, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Employment Outlook in Banking Occupations

              																	Eber, Manuel					 and 	United States. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 						*Employment Outlook in Banking Occupations : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 1156*,												Washington: 								U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 										1954,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/4469,			accessed on September 25, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
# C_2016136EN.01004502.xml

| 18.4.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 136/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.4.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 136/45

---

Order of the General Court of 15 February 2016 — Grandel v OHIM — Beautyge Beauty Group (Beautygen)

(Case T-177/15) (1)

1

(2016/C 136/64)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Ninth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 198, 15.6.2015.

1

---
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 November 23, 2016

a1116

Order 

Clerk

November 23, 2016

153691

KELLI SHINN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 153691

COA: 324227

Wayne CC: 13-008123-NF

STATE OF MICHIGAN SECRETARY OF

STATE ASSIGNED CLAIMS FACILITY,

Defendant,

and

AMERICAN COUNTRY INSURANCE

COMPANY,

Defendant-Appellee,

and

FARMERS INSURANCE EXCHANGE,

Defendant-Appellant.

______________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 29, 2016 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
(Reap. Dec. 8798)

#### United States *v.*Pratt & Whitney Aircraft Div. UAC

Entry Nos. H-6; H-17; H-18; H-35,

*652(Decided May 10, 1957)

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the plaintiff.

Defendant not represented by counsel.

OlivbR, Chief Judge:

These four appeals for reappraisement relate

to certain aircraft engine parts exported from Canada and entered at the port of Hartford, Conn.

The cases are before me on an agreed set of facts that establish cost of production, as defined in section 402 (f) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for appraisement of the merchandise in question and that such statutory value for each of the items is the invoice unit price, packed, and I so hold.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
Case Wo. 14,646.

#### UNITED STATES v. BRIGGS.

[2 Gall. 363.] 1

Circuit Court, D. Massachusetts.

May Term, 1815.

Noxintehcourse — Using British Pasb.

Quaere, whether a piece of cloth, or any other r-agreed signal, is a "pass” within the meaning of the first section of the act of August 13, 1813, 56 [2 Story's i.aws, 1382; 3 Stab 84, c. 57].

This was an indictment founded on the act •of congress of August 13, 1813, c. 56, for using a British pass or protection. The evi•dence on the part of the United States went to prove, that Briggs owned and command•ed a small boat, which was captured in or near the Vineyard Sound, in sight of the British ships of war, having on board vegetables and other provisions of various kinds, and also a piece of blue cloth, which was intended to be affixed to the masthead, as a signal concerted with the enemy, upon seeing which they were to suffer him to pass unmolested. Much evidence was offered on the-part of the accused, to explain or contradict that of the government, but it is unnecessary to state it in this report.

1

 [Reported by John Gallison. Esq.]

STORY. Circuit Justice,

after having summed up the evidence to the jury, directed them that if they believed Briggs to have used a patch for the purpose of protection, ■ in concert with a British commander, this was, in the contemplation of the law, a “pass.” It was as much so. as if a ring, or .•a watch-seal, or any other symbol had been given, upon the exhibition of which the defendant would be permitted to go unmolested; and it was immaterial whether the thing so used was given by the British commander, •or was the property of Briggs, if it were agreed to be used for this puipose. It was the pass that was granted', and not the thing itself.

The honorable judge stated, however, that he did not feel a perfect, confidence in this •construction of the law. but. as the defendant would have a remedy by a motion for a ■new trial to correct any error in this respect. he thought it proper to give an absolute direction to the jury, and to reserve the question for a more deliberate consideration' in case of a conviction.
### SERVED: February 11, 2015 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC
IN THE MATTER OF JOSEPH TERRELL BROWN FAA DOCKETNO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] (Civil Penalty Action) FDMS NO. FAA 2014-0690
ORDERTO SHOW CAUSE The Federal Aviation Administration (hereinafter "FAA") tiled a Complaint dated October7, 2014. Joseph T. Brown, (hereinafter "Respondent") tiled a Request for Hearing, by and through his mother Aheesah Cleveland, dated September 23, 2014. We served our Procedural Order on November 24, 2014. On November 18,2014, the FAA filed a Motionto Deem Allegations Admitted and to Issue Order Assessing Civil Penalty. · Respondenthas failed to file an Answerto the Complaint; has failed to file a response to ourProcedural Order and has failed to respond to the FAA'S Motion to Deem Allegations Admitted andto Issue OrderAssessing Civil Penalty. WHEREFORE, it be and is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. On orbefore March 6, 2015, Respondent shall file a response to this Order stating why the reliefrequested inthe FAA's Motion shouldnotbe granted; and 2. · On orbefore March 6, 2015, Respondent shall answer the Complaint; and 3. On orbefore March 6, 2015, Respondent shall fully comply with our Procedural Order; and 4. Absent full and complete responses to paragraphs I, 2 and 3 hereinabove, Respondent may be sanctioned including, but not limitedto, allegations in the Complaint may be deemed admitted; and/or Respondentmay be precludedfrom introducing any evidence at thehearing otherthan his owntestimony; and/or Respondent's Request for Hearing may be dismissed; and/or a DefaultJudgment may be entered against Respondent in the full amount of the finerequested bythe Agency in its Complaint.

Richard C. Goodwin
·U.S. Administrative Law Judge

2SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL ORIGINAL & ONE COPY Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite2Wl000 1

Joseph Terrell Brown,Respondent 3370 Adriatic Avenue#2A Long Beach, CA 90810 TEL: 562-338-4553 (cell) FAX: 562-208-3793 (home) ONE COPY

Aneesah Cleveland, Re:.,pondent 's Representative 3370 Adriatic Avenue#2A LongBeach, CA 90810 TEL: 562-338-4553 (cell) 562-208-3793 (home) Lierre Green, Complainant's Counsel Office ofthe Regional Counsel, APW-7.6 Federal Aviation Administration Western-Pacific Region P.O. Box 92007 .Los Angeles, CA 90009-2007 TEL: 310-725-7117 FAX: 310-725-6816 The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin,Administrative Law.Judge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-5121 StaffAssistant FAX: 202-366-7536 Docket No. FAA-2014-0690 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person orby expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W 1000, Washington, DC 2059I; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 3
### Draft Agenda

Telephone Conference Call of LV Group

December 20, 2011

 Introductions

 Presentation of Small Business Survey results

 Presentation of Schneider proposal

 Discussion of EL for DL 7 and 8

 Discussion of Data Center Exclusion

 Vote

 Discussion of Next Steps
No. 54909.

#### J. W. Hampton, Jr., & Co.,Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 155450-K (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

An examination of the record disclosing nothing that would warrant the court in disturbing the finding of the collector, which was presumptively correct, the protest was overruled.
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **CMBS Department**

 

MAC N9401-011

1055 10th Avenue SE

Minneapolis, MN 55414 |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc. 

1585 BROADWAY

NEW YORK, New York 10036-8200

 

RE: Annual Statement ofCompliance for Morgan Stanley Bank of America Merrill Lynch Trust 2016-C29,Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2016-C29

 

Per the Pooling and ServicingAgreement dated as of May 1, 2016 (the "Agreement"), the undersigned,a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Custodian ("WellsFargo"), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year endingDecember 31, 2016 (the "Reporting Period"):

 

(a) A review of Wells Fargo'sactivities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under theAgreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and

 

(b) To the best of suchofficer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of itsobligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

 

February 27, 2017

 

/s/ Gail Vannest

GAIL VANNEST

Vice President

 

 

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.