alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

                                             
<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-01-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          66,942
<SECURITIES>                                    13,170
<RECEIVABLES>                                   33,770
<ALLOWANCES>                                       302
<INVENTORY>                                     14,674
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               139,615
<PP&E>                                         141,355
<DEPRECIATION>                                  65,041
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 231,615
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           43,667
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           312
<OTHER-SE>                                     184,423
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   231,615
<SALES>                                        171,535
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               171,535
<CGS>                                           81,074
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   81,074
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  (28)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 140
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 45,097
<INCOME-TAX>                                    16,526
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             28,571
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    28,571
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .94
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .87
        

</TABLE>
(logo) Deutsche Bank

 

1761 East St. Andrew Place

Santa Ana, CA 92705-4934

 

Tel 714 247 6000

Fax 714 247 6009 

 

 

ANNUAL STATEMENT AS TOCOMPLIANCE

 

COMM 2016-DC2

 

The undersigned, David Co, aDirector of Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as the CertificateAdministrator (a "Certifying Servicer") under the Pooling andServicing Agreement, dated as of March 1, 2016 (the "Agreement"), byand among, Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation, as Depositor,Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, CWCapital AssetManagement LLC, as Special Servicer, Wilmington Trust, National Association, asTrustee, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Certificate Administrator,Paying Agent and Custodian, Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, as OperatingAdvisor, and Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, as Asset Representations Reviewerhere by certifies in accordance with Section 10.11of the   Agreement:

 

A) A review of such CertifyingServicer's activities from March 1, 2016 to December 31, 2016 (the"reporting period") and of such Certifying Servicer's performanceunder the Agreement has been made under such officer's supervision and

B) That, as to the best ofsuch officer's knowledge, based on such review, such Certifying Servicer hasfulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement, in all material respectsthroughout the reporting period.

 

DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANYAMERICAS

as Certificate Administrator

 

/s/ David Co

BY: David Co 

Title: Director

Date: March 1, 2017
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Federal Maritime Commission
 Notice is hereby given that the following Ocean Transportation Intermediary licenses have been reissued by the Federal Maritime Commission pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984 (46 U.S.C. Chapter 409), and the regulations of the Commission pertaining to the licensing of Ocean Transportation Intermediaries, 46 CFR Part 515. License No.
Name/address
Date reissued017269N
Fastmark Corporation,   8410 NW 70th Street,  Miami, FL 33166
April 11, 2007.020035NF
Latek Logistics USA Inc.,  175-18 147th Avenue,  Jamaica, NY 11434
March 29, 2007.
 Sandra L. Kusumoto, Director,  Bureau of Certification and Licensing.


[FR Doc. E7-8393 Filed 5-1-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
No. 43112.

#### Petition 5881-R of Meccano Co. of America, Inc. (Boston).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

From the evidence it was found that there was no intention to conceal or misrepresent the facts or to deceive the appraiser. The petition was therefore granted.
Proposed Rule: Mandatory Reporting of Greenhouse Gas EmissionsMeeting Documentation for 13 November 2009 Telephone Call with DuPont Fluoropolymer RepresentativesRegarding Fluorinated Gas ProductionDate:13November 2009Staff Contact Information (Name, email, phone #):Deborah Ottinger, EPA, 343-9149,Ottinger.deborah@epa.gov; Karen Schaffner, RTI,ksschaffner@rti.orgName of Organization (Attach list of all attendees namesand emails if possible):Michael Parr, John Wehner, Suhas Mahuli, Jeremy Blanks (Fluoropolymers), Pat McGee, DuPontSummary of Discussion(e.g., applicability, reporting requirements, etc.):The purpose of the conference call was to discuss emissionsof fluorinated GHG from processes not making GHG. The DuPont representativesnoted the following:DuPont makes fluoropolymer products at its Parkersburg, West Virginia facility (Washington Works) and at the Fayetteville, North Carolinafacility (Fayetteville Works). Some of these fluoropolymer processes make products that are not considered fluorinated GHG but that may usefluorinated GHG as raw materials, and emit fluorinated GHG. The majority of the processes at these sitesdo not use or emit fluorinated GHG.DuPont maintains and meets corporate goals on GHG reductions, and these facilities make emissions calculations and report as part of thecorporate GHG effort. The emissions calculations are not done on a daily basis. In general, facilities conduct monthly data collection efforts.Most fluoropolymer processes are fairly capital intensive and facilities across the industry are typically larger (i.e., no small facilities). Mostfluoropolymer processes are batch processes. During thefluoropolymer production processes, byproducts are made. Thefacility usually looks ator analyzes the amount of byproducts generated by using a form of the mass balance approach. Staff look at the process on a monthly basis byanalyzing the yields; when yields are high, a low percentageis emitted. All process vents at the Parkersburg facility are sent to the thermaloxidizer, although there will be some fugitive emissions.There is no thermal oxidizer at the Fayetteville facility; that site does have a scrubberand process vents are controlled by the scrubber.Fluorochemical facilities may do an emission calculationbased on mass balance, i.e., look at input and outputs and what cannot be accounted forwould be emitted. These emissions calculations wouldbe conducted based on monthly inventories and reported on an annual basis. Because ofhazardous compounds, the company has a zero leaks philosophy, so equipment leak emissions are small. The facilities have air monitoringsystems that measure specific fluorinated compounds, however these are area or ambient monitors. Field inspections by operators are conductedon equipment pieces, including visual inspection of equipment. Staff use a handheld detector, with an infrared analytical technique (would not usean FID) to check for fluorinated GHG leaks, however thereare limits on the detection limit. Process equipmentis leak checked with heliumbefore process startup.Written Comments Provided?Did they also submit to Docket?NoDate sent to EPA-CCDNone
**EXHIBIT23**

**Analysis, Research & PlanningCorporation’s Consent**

Union CarbideCorporation:

Analysis, Research &Planning Corporation (“ARPC”) hereby consents to the use of ARPC’s name and thereference to ARPC’s reports appearing in this Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q of Union Carbide Corporation for the quarter ended June 30,2007.

 

 
| /s/ B. THOMAS FLORENCE                        |   |
|-----------------------------------------------|--------|
| B. Thomas Florence                            |   |
| President                                     |   |
| Analysis, Research & Planning Corporation |   |
| July 26, 2007                                 |   |

 

21

----
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 224 

Expressing support for a National Telework Week to be established. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 2, 2007 

Mr. WOLF (for himself and Mr. SARBANES) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Education and 

Labor 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for a National Telework Week to be 

established. 

Whereas telework is a 21st century workplace practice by employers which gives employees the opportunity to work remotely and securely from any place, at any time; 

Whereas studies have shown that the greatest barrier to overcome for employers in deciding to offer telework is limited understanding of its benefits; 

Whereas employers who offer teleworking to their employees 

benefit through increased employee productivity, better 

worker retention, reduced costs for office space, and the 

opportunity to attract and retain top talent; 


bajohnson on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•HCON 224 IH 

Whereas employees who are allowed to telework benefit from 

a better balance between work and everyday life, improved morale, and use of fewer sick days; 

Whereas society benefits from telework through fewer vehicles 

on the road, commuter cost savings, and reduced traffic 

congestion, thereby cutting auto emissions and improving 

air quality; 

Whereas, by reducing the number of drivers commuting to 

work, telework cuts gasoline consumption, thereby reducing America’s dependence on foreign oil and lessening national and economic security risks; 

Whereas employers that offer telework can ensure continuity 

of operations in response to natural disasters, health 

epidemics, or national emergencies.; 

Whereas some employers express reluctance to offer telework 

as a workplace option because of the nature of a company’s work, office coverage challenges, data security, supervisor resistance, and cost of equipment and information technology; 

Whereas providing employers information about advancements in information technology, communications systems security, productivity measurement standards and 

examples of businesses that embrace telework can help 

allay employer concerns about telework; and 

Whereas the key for employers to learn about and understand 

the benefits of telework is to permit employees to try it 

and test how it works: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That the United States Congress — 


bajohnson on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
3 

•HCON 224 IH 

1 (1) supports the establishment of a National 

2 Telework Week; and 

3 (2) supports the week being observed by em4 ployers allowing their employees, to the extent pos5 sible, to telework one day during National Telework 

6 Week. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
# C_2016038EN.01006002.xml

| 1.2.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 38/60 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.2.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 38/60

---

Order of the General Court of 2 December 2015 — Lidl Stiftung v OHIM — toom Baumarkt (Super-Samstag)

(Case T-213/15) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - Withdrawal of the application for a declaration of invalidity - No need to adjudicate))

(2016/C 038/81)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Lidl Stiftung & Co. KG (Neckarsulm, Germany) (represented by: M. Wolter and A.C. Berger, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: H.P. Kunz, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: toom Baumarkt GmbH (Cologne, Germany) (represented by: M. Kinkeldey, S. Brandstätter and J. Rosenhäger, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 16 February 2015 (Case R 657/2014-5), relating to invalidity proceedings between toom Baumarkt GmbH and Lidl Stiftung & Co. KG.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

| 2. | Lidl Stiftung & Co. KG is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Lidl Stiftung & Co. KG is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 205, 22.6.2015.

1

---
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 307 

Expressing the sense of Congress that Members’ Congressional papers should 

be properly maintained and encouraging Members to take all necessary 

measures to manage and preserve these papers. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 4, 2008 

Mr. BRADY of Pennsylvania submitted the following concurrent resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on House Administration 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of Congress that Members’ Congressional papers should be properly maintained and encouraging Members to take all necessary measures to manage 

and preserve these papers. 

Whereas Members’ Congressional papers (including papers of 

Delegates and Resident Commissioners to the Congress) 

serve as indispensable sources for the study of American 

representative democracy; 

Whereas these papers document vital national, regional, and 

local public policy issues; 

Whereas these papers are crucial to the public’s understanding of the role of Congress in making the Nation’s 

laws and responding to the needs of its citizens; 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
2 

•HCON 307 IH 

Whereas because these papers serve as essential primary 

sources for the history of Congress, the study of these 

papers will illuminate the careers of individual Members; 

Whereas by custom, these papers are considered the personal 

property of the Member who receives and creates them, 

and it is therefore the Member who is responsible to decide on their ultimate disposition; and 

Whereas resources are available through the Office of the 

Clerk of the House of Representatives and the Secretary 

of the Senate to assist Members with the professional 

and cost-effective management and preservation of these 

papers: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that— 

3 (1) Members’ Congressional papers (including 

4 papers of Delegates and Resident Commissioners to 

5 the Congress) should be properly maintained; 

6 (2) each Member of Congress should take all 

7 necessary measures to manage and preserve the 

8 Member’s own Congressional papers; and 

9 (3) each Member of Congress should be encour10 aged to arrange for the deposit or donation of the 

11 Member’s own noncurrent Congressional papers with 

12 a research institution that is properly equipped to 

13 care for them, and to make these papers available 

14 for educational purposes at a time the Member con15 siders appropriate. 

Æ 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
|WELLS FARGO(logo) | Commercial Mortgage ServicingD1050-084, 8th Fl.401 South Tryon StreetCharlotte, NC 282021-800-326-1334
|----------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE



Reference is hereby made
to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of April 1, 2016, by and among CITIGROUP COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES
INC, as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, C-III ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC, as Special Servicer,
PARK BRIDGE LENDER SERVICES LLC, as Operating Advisor and Asset Representations Reviewer, CITIBANK, N.A., as Certificate Administrator
and WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2016-P3
(the “Agreement”). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.



Pursuant to Section 10.08 of this Agreement,
I, Leslie Hayton, Managing Director of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities of the
Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2018 through December 31, 2018 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its
performance per the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based
on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout
the Reporting Period.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned
has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2019.



|/s/ Leslie Hayton | 
|----------------- | 



Leslie Hayton

Managing Director

Wells
Fargo Bank



|Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | Together we’ll go far
|---------------------- | ---------------------
#### Judson-Sheldon Corp. (Keller Tailors Trimmings Co., Inc.) *v.*United States

No. 6434.

Entry No. 759669.

Invoice dated Bradford, England, April 2, 1941.

Certified April 2, 1941.

Entered at New York, N. Y., May 1, 1941.

(Decided October 10, 1946)

*Eugene R. Pickrell*for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Cole, Judge

(Abstract): This appeal for reappraisement of various items of merchandise concerns the so-called British purchase tax, described in the law ■of the United Kingdom entitled, “Finance (No. 2) Act 1940 3 & 4 Geo. 6 Ch. 48.” The said tax was held not to be an item to be included in foreign value as defined in section 402 (c)- of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended by the Customs Administrative Act of 1938 (19 U. S. C. 1940 ed. § 1402 (c)). *United States*v. *Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp.,*33 C. C. P. A. 183, C. A. D. 334.

Undisputed facts in the record before me establish export value, section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. 1940 ed. § 1402 (d)), to be the proper basis for appraisement of the instant merchandise, and that such statutory values for the hair cloth in question are the appraised values, less additions made by the importer on entry because of advances in similar cases.
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

 

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

VALEO NORTH AMERICA, INC., VALEO 

EMBRAYAGES,

Appellants

v.

SCHAEFFLER TECHNOLOGIES AG & CO. KG,

Cross-Appellant

______________________

2018-1196, 2018-1228

______________________

Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 

IPR2016-00502.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________

ROBERT CARTER MATTSON, Oblon LLP, Alexandria, 

VA, argued for appellants. Also represented by TIA 

FENTON, LISA MANDRUSIAK, PHILIPPE J.C. SIGNORE. 

 JUSTIN J. OLIVER, Venable LLP, Washington, DC, 

argued for cross-appellant. Also represented by STEPHEN 

KAI-TUNG YAM. 

 ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (REYNA, SCHALL, and HUGHES, Circuit 

Judges). 

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT 

 

January 15, 2019 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

 Date Peter R. Marksteiner

 Clerk of Court
EXHIBIT 10.62

January 1, 1996


It is the purpose of this letter agreement to confirm that for the period from
January 1, 1995 through March 31, 2000, URT Industries, inc. ("URT") will
provide to Peaches Entertainment Corporation ("PEC") the services of Allan Wolk
("Wolk"), as PEC's Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer and that, in
consideration thereof, PEC agrees to:

       (a)    pay to Wolk during such period, so long as he continues to provide
              such services, a salary at the rate of Five Hundred Thousand
              Dollars ($500,000) per annum, payable monthly, on the first day of
              each month;

       (b)    issue to Wolk annually a form W-2 with respect thereto; and

       (c)    make all other required filings with all governmental authorities
              which relate thereto.

Please sign below to evidence our agreement.

Very truly yours,

URT INDUSTRIES, INC.


BY:


/s/                   Brian Wolk
-------------------------------------------------------------
                 Brian Wolk, Vice President

AGREED AND APPROVED:

PEACHES ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION

BY:


/s/                   Jason Wolk
-------------------------------------------------------------
                 Jason Wolk, Vice President
### VOC RACT rules Hoffman, Barbara to: Robert Mcconnell 05/17/2010 01 :43 PM Cc: "McManus, Karla", "Nixon, Liz" History: This message has been replied to . Hi Bob, Attached is the current draft of ourVOC RACT rule, Env-A 1204, for your review . We are trying to accomplish 3things with this rule: 1) Readopt it before it expires on 12/31 /10 ; 2) Change it froma Part to a Chapter because of its length; and 3) Incorporate requirements to implement 9 of the 11 CTGs in Groups II, III, and IV . Regarding item 1, state lawprovides that administrative rules expire 8 years after adoption unless readopted prior to the expiration date. Regarding item2, this is basically a renumbering exercise. It also allows us to collect all of the definitions at the beginning of the chapter. Let us know if you think that's a good or bad idea . Regarding item3, the only CTGs we are not proposing rules for are Large Appliance Coatings and Automobile and Light Duty Truck Assembly Coatings. We will be submitting a negative declaration for both of those categories. Please note that all language proposed for deletion is struck through, and all new language is in bold italics. The only new language not associated with the 9 CTGs is found in Env-A 1203.04(d) & (e) relating to RACT order procedures. Almost everything else in bold italics is CTG-driven. This rule has not yet been discussed with stakeholders nor has it gone to our Air Resources Council for review . We would appreciate your input first . We do hope to have a stakeholder meeting in the second half of June, and fromthere begin the formal rulemaking process, which includes a public hearing and comment period. Please contact either Karla ( karia.mcmanusCa)_des.nh .aov), Liz (elizabeth .nixon c('~ .des.nh.gov) or me if you need additional information. We would really appreciate receiving your initial comments by June 7 so that we can prepare a draft for distribution prior to the stakeholder meeting. Thanks Bob! Barbara L. Hoffman Compliance & Enforcement Programs Manager NH Dept . of Environmental Services, Air Resources Div. P.O . 'Box 95 29 Hazen Drive Concord, NH 03302-0095 Tel : (603)271-7874 FAX: (603)271-7053