alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2016364EN.01003001.xml

| 3.10.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 364/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.10.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 364/30

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (single Judge) of 18 July 2016 — SD (*1) v EUIPO

(Case F-48/15) (1)

((Civil service - Officials - Staff reporting - 2013 appraisal - Appraisal report - Manifest error of assessment - Recovery plan - Act adversely affecting an official - Admissibility))

(2016/C 364/34)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: SD (*1) (represented by: T. Bontinck and A. Guillerme, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) (represented by: A. Lukošiūtė, acting as Agent)

Re:

Annulment of the applicant’s appraisal report for 2013 and the recovery plan adopted on the basis of that report, together with a claim for damages in respect of the non-pecuniary loss allegedly suffered.

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders  SD (*1) to bear her own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders  SD (*1) to bear her own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office.

---

(*1)  Information erased or replaced within the framework of protection of personal data and/or confidentiality.

(1)  OJ C 190, 8/6/2015.

---
(Reap. Dec. 9602)

#### Schaff Company *v.*United States

Entries Nos. 5302; 10152.

*574(Decided February 19, 1960)

Plaintiff not represented by counsel.

*George Oochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Richardson, Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement relate to certain cuckoo clocks and parts exported from West Germany and entered at the port of Baltimore, Md.

The appeals have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation entered into by the respective parties:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, subject to *the*approval of the court, that the market value or price at the time of exportation of the involved merchandise at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale for home consumption to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature, and all other costs, charges, and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition packed ready for shipment to the United States, is as follows: Invoice unit prices, less 3%, packed.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that there was no higher export value for merchandise such or similar to the merchandise herein involved at the time of exportation thereof.

> IT IS FURTHER AGREED that this case may be submitted for decision on the foregoing stipulation.

On the agreed facts, I find and hold that the proper basis for appraisement of the merchandise in question, as hereinabove referred to, is foreign value, as that value is defined in 19 U.S.O.A. section 1402(c) (section 402(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended)', and that such statutory value is the invoice unit prices, less 3 per centum, packed.

judgment will be entered accordingly.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

JESSICA ALYSE MORENO,

Appellant,

v.

ZAPP CREDIT SOLUTIONS OF SAN 

ANTONIO, LLC, and RUBEN VICTOR 

JUAREZ, JR.,

Appellees.

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-23-00288-CV

Appeal from the

the 57th District Court 

of Bexar County, Texas

(TC#2022-CI-24860)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes the appeal should be 

dismissed for want of prosecution. We therefore dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. We 

further order Appellant to pay all costs of this appeal and that this decision be certified below for 

observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 8TH DAY OF JANUARY 2024.

GINA M. PALAFOX, Justice

Before Alley, C.J., Palafox, and Soto, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report
of Universal Life Holding Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the
period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Frederic S. Richardson , Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of
my knowledge:

(1)       
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)       
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Date: May 24,2004

/s/ Frederic S. RichardsonFrederic
S. RichardsonChief Executive Officer &Chief Finanical Officer
No. 43134.

#### Protests 311314-G, etc., of Nicola Awad & Sons (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

From the evidence it was found that certain items consist of Venice lace similar to that involved in *Littwitz*v. *United States*(3 Cust. Ct. 123, C. D. 217). The claim at 75 percent under paragraph 1430 was therefore sustained.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

RONALD E. McBRIDE, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D16-5075 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ___________________________________) Opinion filed April 13, 2018. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Sarasota County; Debra Johnes Riva, Judge. Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and J. Rafael Rodríguez, Special Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Johnny T. Salgado, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LaROSE, C.J., SILBERMAN and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 248 (Thursday, December 26, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 78330-78331]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-30773]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS

Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the Maine Advisory 
Committee

    Date and Time: Thursday, January 9, 2014, 2:30 p.m. [EST].

[[Page 78331]]

    Place: Via Teleconference. Public Dial-in 1-877-446-3914; Listen 
Line Code: 4558669.
    TDD: Dial Federal Relay Service 1-800-977-8339 give operator the 
following number: 202-376-7533--or by email at bdelaviez@usccr.gov.
    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights (Commission), and 
the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), that a planning meeting of 
the Maine Advisory Committee to the Commission will convene via 
conference call. The purpose of the meeting is to plan for a spring 
briefing meeting on racial disparities in the Maine criminal justice 
system.
    The meeting will be conducted via conference call. Members of the 
public who call-in can expect to incur charges for calls they initiate 
over wireless lines, and the Commission will not refund any incurred 
charges. Callers will incur no charge for calls they initiate over 
land-line connections to the toll-free telephone number.
    Members of the public are entitled to submit written comments. The 
comments must be received in the regional office by Monday, February 
10, 2014. Comments may be mailed to the Eastern Regional Office, U.S. 
Commission on Civil Rights, 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, Suite 1150, 
Washington, DC 20425, faxed to (202) 376-7548, or emailed to 
bdelaviez@usccr.gov. Persons who desire additional information may 
contact Barbara Delaviez at the Eastern Regional Office at 202-376-
7533.
    Records generated from this meeting may be inspected and reproduced 
at the Eastern Regional Office, as they become available, both before 
and after the meeting. Persons interested in the work of this advisory 
committee are advised to go to the Commission's Web site, 
www.usccr.gov, or to contact the Eastern Regional Office at the above 
phone number, email or street address.
    The meetings will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the 
rules and regulations of the Commission and FACA.

    Dated on: December 19, 2013.
David Mussatt,
Acting Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.
[FR Doc. 2013-30773 Filed 12-24-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
```
VARLEN CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Exhibit 11
Computation of Per Share Earnings
Unaudited
(Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)  
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                  Three Months Ended     Nine Months Ended
Primary Earnings Per Share:        11/1/97   11/2/96      11/1/97   1/2/96
<S>                                <C>       <C>           <C>      <C>
Net earnings                        7,675     4,137        18,122   14,859
Computation of the Weighted 
Average Number of Shares
Outstanding as Used in the
Primary Earnings Per Share
Computation:
Weighted average number of
shares outstanding                 11,976     8,631         9,771    8,691
Shares assumed issued under
the treasury stock method             560       383           456      366
Weighted average number of
shares outstanding, as
adjusted                           12,536     9,014        10,227    9,057
Primary Earnings Per Share:          0.61      0.46          1.77     1.64
Fully Diluted Earnings Per Share:
Reconciliation of net earnings
per the condensed consolidated
financial statements to the
amount used for the fully diluted
computation:
Net earnings                        7,675     4,137        18,122   14,859
(Subtract)/add interest on
6.5% convertible subordinated
debentures, net of income tax 
effects                              (471)      681           900    2,063
Net earnings, as adjusted           7,204     4,818        19,022   16,922
Computation of the Weighted 
Average Number of Shares
Outstanding as Used in the
Fully Diluted Earnings Per
Share Computation:
Weighted average number of
shares outstanding*                13,286     8,631        13,266    8,691
Shares assumed issued under
the treasury stock method             559       383           546      365
Shares issuable from assumed
exercise of 6.5% convertible
subordinated debentures               ---     4,582           ---    4,582
Weighted average number of
shares outstanding,
as adjusted                        13,845    13,596        13,812   13,638
Fully Diluted Earnings Per
Share:                               0.52      0.35          1.38     1.24

* The 1997 numbers assume the shares under the 6.5% convertible
  subordinated debentures were outstanding for the entire period.

</TABLE>
Exhibit 11.1        


                            COMPETITIVE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.       
                     Schedule of Computation of Earnings Per Share           
                                      (Unaudited)          

                                                             Quarter
                                                         ended October 31,    
                                                        1997           1996   

Net loss applicable to common stock                 $ (574,175)    $  (474,274)


Common and common equivalent shares -
    primary:
  Weighted average common shares
    outstanding                                      5,954,886      5,903,100
  Adjustments for assumed exercise of
    stock options                                       48,941*        68,006*
  Adjustments for assumed exercise of
    stock warrants                                       5,391*        22,685*
  Weighted average number of common and
    common equivalent shares outstanding             6,009,218      5,993,791

Common and common equivalent shares -
    fully diluted:
  Weighted average common shares
    outstanding                                      5,954,886      5,903,100
  Adjustments for assumed exercise of
    stock options                                       48,941*        81,214*
  Adjustments for assumed exercise of
    stock warrants                                       5,391*        27,609*
  Weighted average number of common and
    common equivalent shares outstanding             6,009,218      6,011,923


    Primary and fully diluted                       $    (0.10)    $    (0.08)


* Anti-dilutive.


These calculations are submitted in accordance with Regulation S-K item 601 (b)
(11) which differs from the requirements of paragraph 40 of Accounting
Principles Board Opinion No.15 because they produce an anti-dilutive result.
**Exhibit 23**

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the inclusion of our reports dated February 28, 2007, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Coventry Health Care, Inc., Coventry Health Care, Inc. management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Coventry Health Care, Inc, included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2006, in the following Registration Statements:

 

| Form S-4 Registration Statement No. 333-123014; |
|-------------------------------------------------|
| Form S-4 Registration Statement No. 333-120300; |
| Form S-8 Registration Statement No. 333-117966; |
| Form S-8 Registration Statement No. 333-122671; |
| Form S-8 Registration Statement No. 33-71806;   |
| Form S-8 Registration Statement No. 33-57014;   |
| Form S-8 Registration Statement No. 33-81356;   |
| Form S-8 Registration Statement No. 33-81358;   |
| Form S-8 Registration Statement No. 33-82562;   |
| Form S-8 Registration Statement No. 33-87114;   |
| Form S-8 Registration Statement No. 33-90268;   |
| Form S-8 Registration Statement No. 33-95084;   |
| Form S-8 Registration Statement No. 33-97246;   |
| Form S-8 Registration Statement No. 333-39581;  |
| Form S-8 Registration Statement No. 333-36735;  |
| Form S-8 Registration Statement No. 333-47239;  |
| Form S-8 Registration Statement No. 333-75615;  |
| Form S-8 Registration Statement No. 333-107064; |
| Form S-3 Registration Statement No. 333-75675;  |
| Form S-4 Registration Statement No. 333-45821;  |
| Form S-3 Registration Statement No. 333-74280;  |
| Form S-4 Registration Statement No. 333-83106   |
| Form S-8 Registration Statement No. 333-138523  |

 

 

Baltimore, Maryland

February 28, 2007
No. 54300.

#### International Hat Co. *v.*United States,

protest 3776A-K (St. Louis).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In its pleadings plaintiff claimed that the currency should have been converted at $0.53085. The case was submitted upon a stipulation that the merchandise in question was purchased and paid for in paper currency of the Netherlands East Indies and not in gold currency or Dutch “Florins”; that the date of exportation from the Netherlands East Indies was January 10, 1940; and that the rate of exchange on that date for such paper currency was $0.533200 (T. D. 50068). An examination of the entry indicates that the merchandise was imported from Java, the sailing date being given as December 22, 1939, and'the sailing date from Sumatra is noted as January 10, 1940. The collector converted the currency on the invoice and entry at the rate in effect on December 22, 1939. In view of the stipulation it was held that the currency should have been converted at the buying rate on the date of exportation, viz, $0.533200. The protest was sustained to this extent. •
MS. PAM ESTES

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS

1517 W. FRONT ST., STE. 354

TYLER, TX 75702

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

RE: Case No. 17-0969 DATE: 11/30/2017

COA #: 12-16-00007-CV TC#: 2014C-0638

STYLE: HEALEY v. HEALEY

A petition for review was filed today in the abovestyled case. Respondent may file either a response, or a

waiver of response. If you file a waiver, the Court will

not grant the petition without first requesting a response. 

(TEX. R. APP. P. 53.3) There is no fee for a response or a

waiver.

FILE COPY
Before the First Division,

September 30, 1942

No. 47608.

#### Protest 972075-G of F. W. Baude (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

The plaintiff’s witness identified samples of merchandise which were received in evidence as exhibits 1 and 2. Exhibit 1 is a so-called slide ornamented with filigree work and he testified that this article is used with cloth or fabric that is sewed to the center bar, the combination of the slide and material being used as a belt for a woman’s dress. Exhibit 2 consists of two-circular metal articles, *1J4*inches in diameter, the tops of which are ornamented with filigree work, and his testimony showed that these articles are belt buckles and used as such on women’s dresses and coats. Plaintiff relied on the decision in *Streamline Button Co.*v. *United States*(7 Cust. Ct. 138, C. D. 555), but inasmuch as that case related to the trade agreement with Czechoslovakia (T. D. 49458), which has no application here, the court held that the decision in that case has no bearing on the issue herein. On the record presented the merchandise was held properly classified under paragraph 1527 (c) (2).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000102438
<NAME> USP REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                       2,622,069
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  477,737
<ALLOWANCES>                                   186,811
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,156,917
<PP&E>                                      34,523,996
<DEPRECIATION>                              11,023,335
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              26,657,578
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          985,949
<BONDS>                                      9,546,389
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     3,880,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  12,245,240
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                26,657,578
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,380,745
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,062,555
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               219,360
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             453,395
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                645,435
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            645,435
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   645,435
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .17


</TABLE>
#### F. W. Woolworth Co. *v.*United States

No. 6107.

Invoices dated Sonneberg, Germany, July 20, 1938.

Certified July 20, 1938.

Entered at Boston, Mass., August 10, 1938.

Entry No. 1362.

(Decided March 1, 1945)

*Sharretts & Hillis (Edward P. Sharretts*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Bao,*Assistant Attorney General *(Daniel I. Auster,*special attorney), for the defendant.

Olivee, Presiding Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> *353It is hereby stipulated by and between counsel for the respective parties hereto, subject to the approval of the court, that the facts and circumstances relating to the item of 10 per centum commission in the case listed in the annexed schedule, identified on the invoice with “xx” in green ink and the initials T. A. McC. of Examiner Timothy A. McCarthy, are in all material respects the same as the facts and circumstances relating to the item of 10 per centum commission specified in the invoices relating to glass tree ornaments, novelties, and figures covered by reappraisements 113038-A, 113040-A, and 113468-A of the E. W. Woolworth Co. and. passed upon by the United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals in *United States*v. *S. S. Kresge Co., B. Shachman & Co., Rice & Co. Corp,, Strauss-Bchardt Co., Inc., F. W. Woolworth Co.,*26 C. C. P. A. 349, 352, wherein the court held that “A purchasing commission, charged for the handling of merchandise, is not a proper part of dutiable value.”

> It is further stipulated and agreed that on the date of exportation of the merchandise involved in the case listed in the annexed schedule, identified on the invoices with “xx” in green ink and the initials T. A. McC. of Examiner Timothy A. McCarthy, articles such and similar thereto were freely offered for sale and sold to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country of exportation in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade for exportation to the United States at the *per se*unit invoice prices, plus 3J4 per centum social assessments for insurance, vacation, and holiday costs, plus packing, as invoiced, and that there was no higher foreign value.

> As to all other items, the appeal is abandoned.

> It is further stipulated and agreed that the record in *United States*v. *S. S. Kresge Co. et al.,*26 C. C. P. A. 349, 352, be incoiporated herein and that the said appeal to reappraisement is submitted on this stipulation.

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise represented on the invoices by the items marked “xx” in green ink and the initials T. A. McC. of Examiner Timothy A. McCarthy, and that such values are the *per se*unit invoice prices, plus 3)4 per centum social assessments for insurance, vacation, and holiday costs, plus packing, as invoiced.

The appeal having been abandoned insofar as it relates to all other merchandise, to that extent the appeal is hereby dismissed.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
| (1)suchAnnual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended February 29, 2020,fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and                            |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                      |   |
| (2)theinformation contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for theyear ended February 29, 2020, fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of LoopIndustries, Inc. |
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                      |   |

| Date:May 5, 2020 |   | /s/ Daniel Solomita                                               |   |
|------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|             |   | DanielSolomita                                                    |   |
|             |   | Presidentand Chief Executive Officer (principal executiveofficer) |   |