alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 35.2

|        |                                                                                                                                                            |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | C-III ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC d/b/a GREYSTONE SPECIAL SERVICING 5221 N. O'Connor Blvd., Suite 800 Irving, Texas 75039

Phone: 972-868-5300

Fax: 972-868-5303 |

 

OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE C-III Asset Management LLC

The undersigned, Barry Davis, Vice President of C-III Asset Management LLC, the current Special Servicer under that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of April 1, 2016, relating to the Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Trust 2016-P3, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2016-P3 (the "Pooling and Servicing Agreement"), hereby certifies as follows:

|   | 1. | a review of the activities of the Special Servicer under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement during the calendar year 2019 or portion thereof has been made under the undersigned's supervision; |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | to the best of the undersigned's knowledge, based on such review, the Special Servicer has fulfilled in all material respects all its obligations under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement throughout such year or portion thereof. |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

Capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings given them in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, as of the 1st day of March, 2020, I have hereunto signed my name.

 

 

/s/ Barry Davis

Barry Davis, Vice President
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS RESTATED SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF THE REGISTRANT INCLUDED IN ITS FIRST QUARTER REPORT TO
SHAREHOLDERS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1997 AS RESTATED AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       3,897,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               95,226,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,172,000
<INVENTORY>                                105,087,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           218,540,000
<PP&E>                                     109,546,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              56,497,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             332,891,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       88,310,000
<BONDS>                                     29,259,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                   144,549,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  58,994,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               332,891,000
<SALES>                                    100,984,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           101,071,000
<CGS>                                       66,372,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               84,506,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,024,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,035,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             11,506,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 4,122,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          7,384,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 7,384,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.11
        

</TABLE>
No. 46973.

#### Protest 947314-G of Eberhard Faber Pencil Co.

Plaintiff’s application for rehearing denied.
#### Curt HERRERA Appellant v. Warden Troy WILLIAMSON; United States of America.

No. 05-1923.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Submitted for Possible Summary Action Under Third Circuit LAR 27.4 and I.O.P. 10.6 June 30, 2005.

Decided Aug. 4, 2005.

Curt Herrera, White Deer, PA, pro se.

Stephen R. Cerutti, II, Office of United States Attorney, Harrisburg, PA for Warden Troy Williamson; United States of America.

Before ALITO, McKEE and AMBRO, Circuit Judges.

*474OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Curt Herrera appeals the dismissal of his habeas petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 by the District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania.

Herrera was convicted in 1993 in the Southern District of New York of numerous counts of racketeering, use of firearms, and use of explosives. He was sentenced to life imprisonment followed by consecutive terms totaling 105 years. Herrera’s motion to vacate his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 was denied in 1997, and the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied his two applications for permission to file a second or successive motion to vacate.

In 2004, Herrera, who is currently confined within the Middle District of Pennsylvania, filed a habeas petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 alleging withholding of exculpatory evidence, improper vouching by the trial court, insufficient evidence and actual innocence of the use of firearms offenses, and ineffective counsel. The District Court dismissed the habeas petition for lack of jurisdiction. We have appellate jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291.

A § 2255 motion filed in the District Court of sentencing is the presumptive means for a federal prisoner to challenge to his sentence. 28 U.S.C. § 2255; *Okereke v. United States,*307 F.3d 117, 120 (3d Cir.2002). A § 2241 petition may not be entertained unless a motion under § 2255 would be “inadequate or ineffective to test the legality of [the] detention.” 28 U.S.C. § 2255. A § 2255 motion is not “inadequate or ineffective” merely because the petitioner can not meet the stringent gate keeping requirements of § 2255, *Okereke,*307 F.3d at 120, or because the sentencing court does not grant relief, *Cradle v. United States ex rel. Miner,*290 F.3d 536, 539 (3d Cir.2002).

There is no doubt that Herrera’s claims fall within the purview of § 2255. Furthermore, as found by the District Court, Herrera has not demonstrated that § 2255 is “inadequate or ineffective.” Accordingly, as there is no substantial question presented by this appeal, we will summarily affirm. Third Circuit LAR 27.4; Third Circuit I.O.P. 10.6.
Exhibit 23

 

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements: 

 

 

| Form S-4 Registration Statement No. 333-123014;    |
|----------------------------------------------------|
| Form S-4 Registration Statement No. 333-120300;    |
| Form S-8 Registration Statement No. 333-117966;    |
| Form S-8 Registration Statement No. 333-122671;    |
| Form S-8 Registration Statement No. 333-75615;     |
| Form S-8 Registration Statement No. 333-107064;    |
| Form S-3 Registration Statement No. 333-75675;     |
| Form S-4 Registration Statement No. 333-45821;     |
| Form S-3 Registration Statement No. 333-74280;     |
| Form S-4 Registration Statement No. 333-83106;     |
| Form S-8 Registration Statement No. 333-138523;    |
| Form S-3 Registration Statement No. 333-141313;    |
| Form S-3 Registration Statement No. 333-145619;    |
| Form S-8 Registration Statement No. 333-57968;     |
| Form S-8 Registration Statement No. 333-57976; and |
| Form S-8 Registration Statement No. 333-50917      |

 

of our reports dated February 27, 2009, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Coventry Health Care, Inc. and the effectiveness of Coventry Health Care, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2008. 

 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

 

Baltimore, Maryland 

February 27, 2009
No. 47614.

#### Protests 87477-K, etc., of Armand Schwab & Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of Abstract 46497 certain of the hemp knotted straw hats in question were held dutiable at 25 percent under paragraph 1504 (b) (1) as claimed.
<PAGE>

                                                           EXHIBIT 10.3


                                PROMISSORY NOTE

Date November 8, 2000

$**300,000.00**


    ON DEMAND, for value received Lighthouse, Inc. Promises to pay to the
order of Hydromaid International, Inc. at 1350 E. Draper Parkway, Draper,
Utah 84020 in the State of Utah, the sum of Three Hundred Thousand Dollars,
in lawful money of the United States of America, with interest at the rate of
6.2 per cent per annum.

All due and payable on or before November 8, 2001. The sum due at the
aforementioned time is $318,549. (Three Hundred Eighteen Thousand Five
Hundred Forty Nine) Dollars.

Should suit be commenced to enforce payment of this note, Lighthouse, Inc.
promises to pay such additional sum as the court may adjudge reasonable as
attorney's fees in said suit.


Hydromaid International, Inc.          Lighthouse, Inc.

/s/ John W. Nagel                      /s/ Culley W. Davis
------------------------               -----------------------
By: John W. Nagel                      By: Culley W. Davis
    Chief Financial Officer                Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 230 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 230

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas every 3 minutes a woman is diagnosed with breast cancer;
Whereas another 180,510 new cases of breast cancer are expected to be diagnosed 
        in the United States in 2007;
Whereas breast cancer is the leading cause of death among women between the ages 
        of 45 and 54;
Whereas 1 out of every 8 women who live to the age of 85 will develop breast 
        cancer in her lifetime;
Whereas the survival rate of women who have breast cancer is 98.1 percent when 
        detected in the early stages;
Whereas mammograms and monthly breast self-examinations are the key components 
        of early detection; and
Whereas observing a Breast Cancer Awareness Month would provide a special 
        opportunity to offer education on the importance of monthly breast self-
        examinations and annual mammograms: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That Congress--
            (1) supports the observance of Breast Cancer Awareness 
        Month in order to provide a special opportunity to offer 
        education on the importance of monthly breast self-examinations 
        and annual mammograms;
            (2) salutes the more than 2.4 million breast cancer 
        survivors in the United States and the efforts of victims, 
        volunteers, and professionals who combat breast cancer each 
        day;
            (3) recognizes and applauds the national and community 
        organizations for their work in promoting awareness about 
        breast cancer, providing information, and offering treatment to 
        its sufferers; and
            (4) urges organizations and health practitioners to use 
        this opportunity to promote awareness about breast cancer, to 
        support monthly self-examinations, and to encourage annual 
        mammograms.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 29, 2007.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
110th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                            H. CON. RES. 230

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

  Supporting the observance of Breast Cancer Awareness Month, and for 
                            other purposes.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS RESTATED SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF THE REGISTRANT INCLUDED IN ITS FIRST QUARTER REPORT TO
SHAREHOLDERS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997, AS RESTATED AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                      52,632,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                              131,195,000
<ALLOWANCES>                               (1,884,000)
<INVENTORY>                                123,109,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           321,180,000
<PP&E>                                     121,320,000
<DEPRECIATION>                            (59,738,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             445,597,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      173,620,000
<BONDS>                                     29,483,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                   146,827,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  83,089,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               445,597,000
<SALES>                                    140,251,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           140,408,000
<CGS>                                       88,184,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              113,083,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             5,524,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             990,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             20,811,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 7,410,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         13,401,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                13,401,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.21
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-6052
RUSSELL L. PREVATTE, Petitioner - Appellant, v. W. ELAINE CHAPMAN, Deputy Warden, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (5:07-hc-02040-H) Submitted: May 5, 2008 Decided: June 25, 2008 Before TRAXLER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Russell L. Prevatte, Appellant Pro Se. Steve R. Matheny, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Russell L. Prevatte, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition and his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Prevatte v. Chapman , No. 5:07-hc-02040-H (E.D.N.C. Aug. 14, 2007; Nov. 19, 2007). We deny Prevatte’s motion to substitute party. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED
(Reap. Dec. 9615)

#### Esterbrook Pen Co. *v.*United States

Entry No. 861703.

(Decided March 1, 1960)

Plaintiff not represented by counsel.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Lawrence, Judge:

There was no appearance on behalf of plaintiff when the above-enumerated appeal for a reappraisement was called for hearing. The court thereupon ordered the case submitted.

*587It is provided by the rules of the court that, in such an instance, after the opposite party has had an opportunity to present evidence on the issues, the case may be decided by the court on the record before it.

Accordingly, I have examined the record in the present appeal for a reappraisement and find nothing therein which tends in any way to overcome the presumption of correctness which attaches to the decision of the appraiser. I find and hold, therefore, that the proper value of the merchandise is the value returned by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
#### Clarence A. FREDERICK, Petitioner, v. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, Respondent.

No. 05-3218.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Aug. 25, 2005.

*ORDER*

Clarence A. Frederick (“Frederick”) moves without opposition for reconsideration of the court’s order of August 8, 2005 dismissing his petition for review for failure to file the required Fed. Cir. R. 15(c) statement concerning discrimination form.1 Frederick also moves for an extension of time, until September 30, 2005, to file his brief.

Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The order of dismissal and the mandate are vacated and recalled, and the petition for review is reinstated.

(2) The motion for an extension of time is granted. The brief is due on or before September 30, 2005.

1

. Frederick’s Fed. Cir. R. 15(c) form was submitted with this motion.
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 14-1640

___________________________

Donna Lynn Henry

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner, Social Security Administration

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Western District of Arkansas - Ft. Smith

____________

 Submitted: November 21, 2014

Filed: December 4, 2014

[Unpublished]

____________

Before WOLLMAN, BYE, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.
Donna Lynn Henry appeals the district court’s order affirming the denial of 1

disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. Upon de novo

review, we agree with the district court that the administrative law judge’s (ALJ’s)

decision is supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole. See Owens

v. Colvin, 727 F.3d 850, 851 (8th Cir. 2013). Specifically, contrary to Henry’s

assertions on appeal, the ALJ’s credibility determination is entitled to deference

because it is based on several valid reasons, see McDade v. Astrue, 720 F.3d 994, 998

(8th Cir. 2013); the ALJ properly discounted the RFC opinions of two treating

physicians, see Perkins v. Astrue, 648 F.3d 892, 897-98 (8th Cir. 2011) (treating

physician’s opinion does not automatically control); Davidson v. Astrue, 501 F.3d

987, 990-91 (8thCir. 2007) (treating physician’s opinion is properly discounted when

it is inconsistent with physician’s own treatment notes); Henry failed to meet her

burden of establishing more limitations than those found by the ALJ in his RFC

determination, which were consistent with the medical evidence, see Martise v.

Astrue, 641 F.3d 909, 923 (8th Cir. 2011) (claimant bears burden of persuasion to

prove disability and demonstrate RFC; RFC is medical question so it must be

supported by some medical evidence); and because the ALJ’s hypothetical to the

vocational expert encompassed all of Henry’s proven impairments, the vocational

expert’s response to the hypothetical constituted substantial evidence, see Buckner

v. Astrue, 646 F.3d 549, 560-61 (8th Cir. 2011). The judgment of the district court

is affirmed.

______________________________

The Honorable P.K. Holmes, III, Chief Judge, United States District Court for

1

the Western District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the

Honorable Erin Setser, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of

Arkansas.

-2-
Exhibit
32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 Pursuant
to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as President,
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Operating Officer of VSE Corporation (the
"Company"), does hereby certify that to the best of the undersigned's
knowledge:
 
 
 1) the Company's Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 (the "Report"), fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and
 
 2) the information contained in the
Company's Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 Date:
      April 30,
      2010
            /s/
      M. A. GauthierM.
      A. GauthierChief
      Executive Officer, Presidentand
      Chief Operating Officer