alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HOME COLLECTION EDUCATION IMAGE GALLERY SOUTH FLORIDA ORGANIZATIONS MEETINGS STAFF

SHARK TROPICAL

RESEARCH FRESHWATER

RESEARCH BIOLOGICAL PROFILES JUST FOR KIDS SITE LINKS FLMNH 

# South Florida Aquatic Environments Coral Reefs



# GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION

World Distribution of Coral Reefs


## Distribution of coral reefs: Worldwide Florida
Worldwide Reef-building corals are found in tropical and subtropical regions around the world Reef corals are found throughout 

### tropical and 

### subtropical oceans in the Indo-Pacific and Atlantic, normally between the Tropic of Capricorn and Tropic of Cancer (30oS, 30oN latitude). However, they also occur outside this range where warm water currents travel outside this band, as is the case where the Gulf Stream Current brings warm tropical water from the Caribbean north to the islands of Bermuda. South Florida Homepage · Everglades Home Page · Florida Bay Home Page · Florida Keys Home Page
· Corals Reefs: Intro · Corals · Coral Species Profiles · Habitat Requirements · Geographical Distribution · Reef Communities Hardbottom Community Patch Reef Community Bank Reef Community · Coral Diseases Black Band Disease White Band Disease Coral Bleaching · Importance of Coral Reefs · Impacts: Human · Impacts: Natural 

### FLMNH Ichthyology Department: South Florida Aquatic Environments http://www.flmnh.ufl.edu/Fish/southflorida/coral/distribution.html

1 of 2 5/3/2012 4:23 PM

### Florida Reef Tract courtesy Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary 

## Florida Florida Reef Tract is the third largest barrier reef in the world Along the Atlantic coast of Florida, Oculina reefs dominate in the north, transitioning southward to tropical reefs. South and west of Miami, offshore of the Florida Keys archipelago, is the only tropical coral reef found along the North American coastline. This region, also known as the Florida Reef Tract, is the third largest barrier reef system in the world. Toward the coastline, these reefs are surrounded by the Florida Keys, Biscayne Bay, and Florida Bay. Moving out to sea from the reef is the Florida Current . This current brings tropical waters into the area that moderate winter water temperatures as well as large volumes of plankton and larvae-rich water from the Caribbean. Glossary Site Contents 

### FLMNH Ichthyology Department: South Florida Aquatic Environments http://www.flmnh.ufl.edu/Fish/southflorida/coral/distribution.html

2 of 2 5/3/2012 4:23 PM
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed October 4, 2016.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-16-00060-CV

WILLIAM SATTERWHITE, JR., Appellant

V.

STEVEN AKINS AND HOUSTON PRESS, L.P. AND CRAIG MALISOW, 

Appellees

On Appeal from the Co Civil Ct at Law No 1

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1061321

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This appeal is from a judgment signed December 18, 2015. No clerk’s 

record has been filed. The clerk responsible for preparing the record in this appeal 

informed the court appellant did not make arrangements to pay for the record. 

On April 1, 2016, notification was transmitted to all parties of the court’s 

intention to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless, within fifteen days, 
2

appellant paid or made arrangements to pay for the record and provided this court 

with proof of payment. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b).

Appellant has not provided this court with proof of payment for the record. 

Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jamison, McCally, and Wise.
III 

Calendar No. 444 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 456 

Expressing the sense of the Senate on the discussion by the North Atlantic 

Council of secure, sustainable, and reliable sources of energy. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 1, 2006 

Mr. LUGAR submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Foreign Relations 

MAY 23, 2006 

Reported by Mr. LUGAR, without amendment 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the Senate on the discussion by 

the North Atlantic Council of secure, sustainable, and 

reliable sources of energy. 

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that— 

2 (1) the President should place on the agenda 

3 for discussion at the North Atlantic Council, as soon 

4 as practicable, the merits of establishing a policy 

5 and strategy for the North Atlantic Treaty Organi6 zation to promote the security of members of the OrVerDate Aug 31 2005 03:50 May 24, 2006 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\SR456.RS SR456

bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

SRES 456 RS 

1 ganization through the development of secure, sus2 tainable, and reliable sources of energy; and 

3 (2) the President should submit to Congress a 

4 report that sets forth— 

5 (A) the actions the United States has 

6 taken to place the matter referred to in para7 graph (1) on the agenda for discussion at the 

8 North Atlantic Council; 

9 (B) the position of the United States on 

10 the matter, as communicated to the North At11 lantic Council by the representatives of the 

12 United States to the Council; 

13 (C) a summary of the debate on the mat14 ter at the North Atlantic Council, including any 

15 decision that has been reached with respect to 

16 the matter by the Council; and 

17 (D) a strategy for the North Atlantic 

18 Treaty Organization to develop secure, sustain19 able, and reliable sources of energy, including 

20 contingency plans if current energy resources 

21 are put at risk. 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS

bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
Calendar No. 444 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 456 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the Senate on the discustainable, and reliable sources of energy. sion by the North Atlantic Council of secure, susMAY 23, 2006 

Reported without amendment 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1997
<CASH>                                         1945580
<SECURITIES>                                    361267
<RECEIVABLES>                                   195803
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     500000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               3204157
<PP&E>                                        12581589
<DEPRECIATION>                                 5948644
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                15863331
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2880432
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      29037
<COMMON>                                         53138
<OTHER-SE>                                     5742061
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  15863331
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               3639923
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1668481
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                619754
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              525433
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 730822
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             730822
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    730822
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.15
        

</TABLE>
Before the Third Division,

November 28, 1945

No. 50716.

#### Protests 5727-K, etc., of Biddle Purchasing Co. et al. (Boston and San Francisco).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                        <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              3-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998             MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          98,978                  98,978
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,075,587               1,075,587
<ALLOWANCES>                                    50,000                  50,000
<INVENTORY>                                  2,627,365               2,627,365
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,991,269               3,991,269
<PP&E>                                       1,642,117               1,642,117
<DEPRECIATION>                                 117,165                 117,165
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,993,917               7,993,917
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,869,878               1,869,878
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                        32,456                  32,456
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,814,416               4,814,416
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,993,917               7,993,917
<SALES>                                      2,326,044               8,979,319
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,326,044               8,979,319
<CGS>                                        2,059,124               7,440,586
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,059,124               7,440,586
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               570,805               1,755,855
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              63,294                 210,176
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (385,016)               (345,605)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (385,016)               (345,605)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (385,016)               (345,605)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.12)                   (.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.12)                   (.11)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 12.2
 United Air Lines, Inc. and Subsidiary Companies
 Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
 and Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividend Requirements
 Three Months EndedMarch 31,(In millions)
    
    2009
    
    
    2008Adjusted (e)Earnings (loss):Loss before income taxes & adjustments for minority interest
and equity earnings of affiliates
    
    $
    (411
    )
    
    $
    (553
    )Add (deduct):Fixed charges, from below
    
    
    223
    
    
    
    189Distributed earnings of affiliates
    
    
    1
    
    
    
    Interest capitalized
    
    
    (3
    )
    
    
    (5
    )Loss as adjusted
    
    $
    (190
    )
    
    $
    (369
    )Fixed charges:Interest expensed and capitalized and amortization
of debt discounts and issuance costs (a)
    
    $
    134
    
    
    $
    146Portion of rental expense representative
of the interest factor
    
    
    89
    
    
    
    43Fixed charges, as above
    
    
    223
    
    
    
    189Preferred stock dividend requirements (pre-tax) (b)
    
    
    
    
    
    
    2Fixed charges including preferred stock dividends
    
    $
    223
    
    
    $
    191Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
    
    
    (c
    )
    
    
    (d
    )Ratio of earnings to fixed charges and preferred dividend requirements
    
    
    (c
    )
    
    
    (d
    )
 (a)
    
    Amortization of debt discounts includes amortization of fresh-start valuation
discounts.(b)
    
    The Company had an immaterial tax rate in the 2008 period and did not adjust its
preferred stock dividends.(c)
    
    Earnings were inadequate to cover fixed charges by $413 million for the three months
ended March 31, 2009.(d)
    
    Earnings were inadequate to cover fixed charges and fixed charges and preferred
dividend requirements by $558 million and $560 million, respectively, for the three months
ended March 31, 2008.(e)
    
    In accordance with a new accounting standard that became effective January 1, 2009,
the amounts reported for 2008 have been retrospectively adjusted. Retrospective adoption
was required as discussed in Note 2, New Accounting Pronouncements, in Combined Notes to
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited).
Exhibit 31.2

                        SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION OF CFO


I, James S. Ross, Chief Financial Officer of Maxus Technology Corporation,
certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Maxus Technology
Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

      a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

      b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

      c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

      a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

      b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.


/s/ James S. Ross
-----------------------
James S. Ross
Chief Financial Officer
April 5, 2005
---

Summary of Loan Agreement Entered into by and between
Shenzhen BAK Battery Co., Ltd. (the Company) and Longgang Branch, Shenzhen Development Bank Co., Ltd (the Creditor) on January 30, 2011

Main contents:

- Contract number:
      Shenfa Longgang Daizi 20110130001;
- Main Contract:
      Comprehensive Credit Facility Agreement;
- Main Contract
      number: Shenfa Longgang Zongzi 20110120001;
- Loan principal:
      RMB 60 million;
- Loan term: from
      January 30, 2011 to January 29, 2012;
- Floating
      interest rate: Interest rate of loan shall be equal to the benchmark rate
      announced by the Peoples Bank of China, and be adjusted every 3 months;

> Interest accrued
>       and settled per month, interest settlement day is the 20th
>       day of each month;
>     Penalty interest
>       rate for delayed repayment: current interest rate plus 50% * current
>       interest rate;
>     Penalty interest
>       rate for embezzlement of loan proceeds: current interest rate *1;

- Purpose of the
      loan is to provide working capital for the Company;
- If any of the
      following occurs, the Creditor is entitled to demand prepayment of loan
      principal and interest before maturity and cancel all loans unprovided ;

> The Company
>       terminates operation or is stopped from operation;
>     The Company
>       provides untrue documents or hide important financial information about
>       its operation;
>     The Company intentionally evades
>     bank debts by way of related party transaction or other means;
>     The Company uses loan proceeds
>     for purposes other than what is agreed without the consent of the Creditor;
>     Occurrence of other instances
>     which endangers or may endanger the safety of the loan provided by the
>     Creditor;

Headlines of the articles omitted:

- Interest clearing of the loan
- Payment of the loan
- Rights and obligation of the Company
- Rights and obligations of the Creditor
- Disputation settlement and Validity
- Fees
- Breach of contract penalties
- Declaration, guaranty and undertaking of the Company
- Amendment and Termination of Contract
- Others
- Validity

---
(A. R. D. 42)

#### Page N. Goffigon for Account of Charles R. Allen *v.*United States

Entry Nos. W-190; W-191; W-166.

Third Division, Appellate Term

(Decided May 14, 1954)

*John F. Kavanagh*for the appellant.

*Warren E.*Burger, Assistant Attorney General *(Samuel D. Spector,*trial attorney), for the appellee.

Before Ekwall and Johnson, Judges

EKWALL, Judge:

This is an application for review of the decision of Ford, J., sitting in reappraisement, reported in 30 Cust. Ct. 563, Reap. Dec. 8229. From a decision in favor of the defendant below, plaintiff below appeals.

The merchandise consists of grated coconut in sirup. The trial judge, after a thorough discussion of the evidence produced, found that there was no proof that other exporters than the one here involved were not freely offering and selling this same coconut, within the requirements of the statute, at. prices equivalent to those found by the appraiser as the value of this merchandise. Based upon that finding, he held that the weight of the evidence was not sufficient to overcome the presumption of correctness attaching to the values *672found by the appraiser, or to establish any other value for the merchandise. The appraised values were held to be the proper dutiable values in each instance.

When the case was argued before this division of the court on this application for review, counsel for appellant did not appear, but in a letter to the clerk of the court requested that the case be submitted on the brief filed in the court below and on the assignment of errors. At the oral argument, counsel for appellee moved that the application for review be dismissed on the ground that the assignment of errors presented no issues which are properly appealable, and on the further ground that said assignment of errors was not briefed nor argued at the hearing.

We find the motion to dismiss well founded. An examination of the assignment of errors discloses that it is such as could not have been covered by the brief filed before the trial court, nor do we find any authorities cited in support of the alleged errors. Moreover, the authorities hold that assignments of error not set out in briefs or not argued or supported by authorities are waived. See Fifth Decennial Digest (American Digest System, 1936 to 1946), volume 3, sec. 1078, pp. 1724, *et seq.*

In dismissing the application for review, we do so with no reluctance, since a careful perusal of the record discloses that the trial judge has properly evaluated the evidence presented before him.

The motion that the application for review be dismissed is, therefore, granted.
#### UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Johnny Lee MOYE, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-11183

Non-Argument Calendar.

D.C. Docket No. 04-80115-CR-DMM.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

Sept. 8, 2005.

Carol E. Herman, Anne R. Schultz, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Madeleine R. Shirley, Miami, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Peter Birch, Federal Public Defender, West Palm Beach, FL, Kathleen M. Williams, Miami, FL, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before TJOFLAT, DUBINA and PRYOR, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Johnny Lee Moye appeals his 180-month sentence for possession of a firearm by a felon. Moye argues that his right to a jury trial under the Sixth Amendment was violated when the district court, as a matter of law, determined that Moye’s admitted previous convictions were qualifying offenses for the purpose of enhancing Moye’s sentence under the Armed Career Criminal Act. Because the determination that Moye’s previous convictions were qualifying offenses was a question of law for the court, we affirm.

We review Moye’s sentence *de novo,*but will reverse only for harmful error. *United States v. Paz,*405 F.3d 946, 948-49 (11th Cir.2005).

Moye pleaded guilty to one count of possession of a firearm by a felon. 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). Moye’s admitted previous convictions include attempted burglary, sale of cocaine, sale of marijuana, and resisting an officer with violence. The district court concluded that these previous convictions qualified Moye as an armed career criminal. Under section 922(g)(1), the statutory maximum term of imprisonment is 120 months, but under the mandatory minimum sentence provision of the Armed Career Criminal Act, a defendant with three qualifying convictions is subject to a minimum sentence of 180 months. 18 U.S.C. § 924(e). Because Moye has at least three qualifying previous convictions, the district court sentenced him under section 924(e).

Although he admits his previous convictions, Moye argues that the district court violated his right to a jury trial under the Sixth Amendment when the court determined that his previous convictions were qualifying offenses for an enhanced sen*287tence under section 924(e). In Moye’s view, the question whether a previous conviction is a qualifying offense for the purpose of sentence enhancement is a factual question for the jury, not the court. Moye is wrong.

Whether a previous conviction is a qualifying offense under section 924(e) is a question of law for the court. *See Shepard v. United States,*544 U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 1254, 161 L.Ed.2d 205 (2005). Although the Supreme Court has limited the sources to which a judge may look in determining whether a previous conviction is a qualifying offense under section 924(e), *id.*at -, 125 S.Ct. at 1257, Moye does not argue that the district court looked beyond those sources in sentencing him as an armed career criminal. The district court did not err.

AFFIRMED.