alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 216 

Recognizing the wine and winegrape industry of Texas for having an economic 

impact of $1,000,000,000 on the economy of Texas. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 20, 2007 

Mr. CONAWAY (for himself, Mr. BRADY of Texas, Ms. GRANGER, Mr. MCCAUL

of Texas, Mr. NEUGEBAUER, Mr. PAUL, Mr. CUELLAR, Mr. AL GREEN

of Texas, Mr. REYES, Mr. RODRIGUEZ, Mr. LAMPSON, Mr. CULBERSON, 

Mr. SMITH of Texas, Mr. BURGESS, Mr. ORTIZ, Mr. MARCHANT, Mr. 

DOGGETT, Mr. HINOJOSA, Mr. SESSIONS, Mr. CARTER, and Mr. SAM

JOHNSON of Texas) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which 

was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the wine and winegrape industry of Texas for 

having an economic impact of $1,000,000,000 on the 

economy of Texas. 

Whereas, since 2000, the wine and winegrape industry of 

Texas has experienced tremendous growth, with nearly 

90 percent of such growth resulting from an increase in 

the number and revenue of small wineries producing less 

than 5,000 gallons of wine each year; 

Whereas, since 2000, wine production in Texas has grown by 

30 percent, making Texas the fifth most productive State 

in wine production; and 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

2 

•HCON 216 IH 

Whereas, in 2005, the wine and winegrape industry of 

Texas— 

(1) included 113 wineries and 220 commercial growers of winegrapes on 2,900 acres; 

(2) produced over 626,000 cases of wine; 

(3) provided the equivalent of 8,000 full-time jobs 

and paid over $234,000,000 in wages to workers; 

(4) generated revenue from wineries that produced 

an economic impact of $91,500,000 on the economy of 

Texas; 

(5) generated over $10,000,000 in revenue from 

vineyards in Texas; 

(6) attracted over 868,000 tourists to Texas, who 

spent over $220,000,000; and 

(7) generated over $69,000,000 in Federal, State, 

and local taxes: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That Congress recognizes the wine and 

3 winegrape industry of Texas for having an economic im4 pact of $1,000,000,000 on the economy of Texas. 

Æ 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 5790] 

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                         *et seq.*; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note,                         *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236 of October 19, 1999, as amended, and Delegation of Authority No. 257 of April 15, 2003 [68 FR 19875], I hereby determine that the objects to be included in the exhibition “Roman Art from the Louvre”, imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at the Indianapolis Museum of Art, Indianapolis, Indiana, from on or about September 23, 2007, until on or about January 6, 2008, the Seattle Art Museum, Seattle, Washington, from on or about February 19, 2008, until on or about May 11, 2008, and the Oklahoma City Museum of Art, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, from on or about June 19, 2008, until on or about October 12, 2008, and at possible additional venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. Public Notice of these Determinations is ordered to be published in the                         **Federal Register.**

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

For further information, including a list of the exhibit objects, contact Wolodymyr Sulzynsky, Attorney-Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: (202) 453-8050). The address is U.S. Department of State, SA-44, 301 4th Street, SW., Room 700, Washington, DC 20547-0001. 

Dated: April 25, 2007. 

C. Miller Crouch, 

Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.

 [FR Doc. E7-8474 Filed 5-2-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 85 (Thursday, May 3, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 24655]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-8474]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 5790]


Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Roman Art from the Louvre''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236 
of October 19, 1999, as amended, and Delegation of Authority No. 257 of 
April 15, 2003 [68 FR 19875], I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``Roman Art from the Louvre'', imported from 
abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, are of 
cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan 
agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that 
the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at the Indianapolis 
Museum of Art, Indianapolis, Indiana, from on or about September 23, 
2007, until on or about January 6, 2008, the Seattle Art Museum, 
Seattle, Washington, from on or about February 19, 2008, until on or 
about May 11, 2008, and the Oklahoma City Museum of Art, Oklahoma City, 
Oklahoma, from on or about June 19, 2008, until on or about October 12, 
2008, and at possible additional venues yet to be determined, is in the 
national interest. Public Notice of these Determinations is ordered to 
be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Wolodymyr Sulzynsky, Attorney-
Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State 
(telephone: (202) 453-8050). The address is U.S. Department of State, 
SA-44, 301 4th Street, SW., Room 700, Washington, DC 20547-0001.

    Dated: April 25, 2007.
C. Miller Crouch,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural 
Affairs, Department of State.
 [FR Doc. E7-8474 Filed 5-2-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
[David T. Thomson P.C. letterhead]



                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANT

I consent to the  inclusion in this  registration  statement on Form 10-SB of my
report,  which includes an explanatory  paragraph  which discusses the Company's
ability to continue as a going concern, dated March 11, 1998, on my audit of the
financial  statements of Commercial  Concepts,  Inc. for the year ended February
28, 1998.

David T. Thomson, P.C.

/s/   David T. Thomson, P.C.

Salt Lake City, Utah
February 22, 2000
No. 50711.

#### Protests 10718-K, etc., of Kwong Kee Jan & Co. et al. (San Francisco).

*333Opinion by

Cole, J.

It was conceded that certain items of the merchandise consist of ve-tsin similar in all material respects as that passed upon in *Quong Yuen Shing Co.*v. *United States*(31 C. C. P. A. 43, C. A. D. 247). On the established facts the merchandise, which includes salt as a substantial component part thereof, was excluded from paragraph 5 and held dutiable at 20 percent under paragraph 1558 as claimed.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 599 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 599

Designating the week of October 23, 2006, through October 27, 2006, as 
         ``National Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention Week''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

           September 30 (legislative day, September 29), 2006

Mr. Reed (for himself, Ms. Collins, Mr. Lautenberg, Mr. Lieberman, Mr. 
 Sarbanes, Ms. Mikulski, Mr. Dodd, Mr. Biden, Mr. Nelson of Nebraska, 
 Mrs. Murray, Mr. Wyden, Ms. Stabenow, Ms. Cantwell, Mr. Feingold, Mr. 
Inouye, Mr. Johnson, Mr. Carper, Mr. DeWine, Mr. Obama, Mr. Chafee, Mr. 
Kerry, Mr. Durbin, Mr. Levin, Mrs. Clinton, Mrs. Lincoln, Mr. Schumer, 
Mr. Bond, Mr. Santorum, Mr. Pryor, Ms. Snowe, Ms. Landrieu, Mr. Hagel, 
 Mr. Leahy, Mr. Specter, Mr. Bayh, Mr. Menendez, Mrs. Boxer, and Mrs. 
 Feinstein) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                     the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Designating the week of October 23, 2006, through October 27, 2006, as 
         ``National Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention Week''.

Whereas lead poisoning is a leading environmental health hazard to children in 
        the United States;
Whereas according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 310,000 
        preschool children in the United States have harmful levels of lead in 
        their blood;
Whereas lead poisoning may cause serious, long-term harm to children, including 
        reduced intelligence and attention span, behavior problems, learning 
        disabilities, and impaired growth;
Whereas children from low-income families are significantly more likely to be 
        poisoned by lead than are children from high-income families;
Whereas children may be poisoned by lead in water, soil, or consumable products;
Whereas children most often are poisoned in their homes through exposure to lead 
        particles when lead-based paint deteriorates or is disturbed during home 
        renovation and repainting; and
Whereas lead poisoning crosses all barriers of race, income, and geography: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) designates the week of October 23, 2006, through 
        October 27, 2006, as ``National Childhood Lead Poisoning 
        Prevention Week''; and
            (2) calls upon the people of the United States to observe 
        the week with appropriate programs and activities.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2017300EN.01002902.xml

| 11.9.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 300/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.9.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 300/29

---

Judgment of the General Court of 13 July 2017 — myToys.de v EUIPO — Laboratorios Indas (myBaby)

(Case T-519/15) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative mark myBaby - Earlier EU word, and EU figurative and national word marks MAYBABY, May BaBy and MAY BABY - Ancillary appeal - Article 8(3) of Regulation (EC) No 216/96 - Merely confirmatory decision - Inadmissibility))

(2017/C 300/36)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: myToys.de GmbH (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: C. Hauss-Löhde and M. Mette, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: H. Kunz, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Laboratorios Indas, SA (Pozuelo de Alarcon, Spain) (represented by: M. de Justo Bailey, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 17 June 2015 (Case R 1002/2014-2), relating to opposition proceedings between Laboratorios Indas and myToys.de.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | The action is dismissed; |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed;

| 2. | myToys.de GmbH shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by Laboratorios Indas, SA; |
| --- | --- |

2.

myToys.de GmbH shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by Laboratorios Indas, SA;

| 3. | European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) shall bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) shall bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 363, 3.11.2015.

1

---
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 88 (Tuesday, May 8, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 26198]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-8747]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Publication of Inflation Adjustment Factor, Nonconventional 
Source Fuel Credit, and Reference Price for Calendar Year 2006

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Publication of the inflation adjustment factor, 
nonconventional source fuel credit, and reference price for calendar 
year 2006 as required by section 45K of the Internal Revenue Code (26 
U.S.C. 45K). The inflation adjustment factor, nonconventional source 
fuel credit, and reference price are used in determining the tax credit 
allowable on the sale of fuel from nonconventional sources under 
section 45K during calendar year 2006.

DATES: The 2006 inflation adjustment factor, nonconventional source 
fuel credit, and reference price apply to qualified fuels sold during 
calendar year 2006.
    Inflation Adjustment Factor: In the cases of gas produced from 
biomass and liquid, gaseous, or solid synthetic fuel produced from 
coal, the inflation adjustment factor for calendar year 2006 is 2.3429. 
In the case of facilities producing coke or coke gas, the inflation 
adjustment factor for calendar year 2006 is 1.0605.
    Credit: The nonconventional source fuel credit for gas produced 
from biomass and for liquid, gaseous, or solid synthetic fuel produced 
from coal for calendar year 2006 (adjusted to reflect the phase-out 
amount) is $4.72 per barrel-of-oil equivalent of qualified fuels. In 
the case of facilities producing coke or coke gas, the nonconventional 
source fuel credit for calendar year 2006 is $3.18 per barrel-of-oil 
equivalent of qualified fuels.
    Reference Price: The reference price for calendar year 2006 is 
$59.68. Because the reference price exceeds $23.50 multiplied by the 
inflation adjustment factor, under section 45K(b)(1), the credit for 
gas produced from biomass and for liquid, gaseous, or solid synthetic 
fuel produced from coal is reduced by $2.31 per barrel-of-oil 
equivalent of qualified fuels for calendar year 2006. The phase-out of 
the credit does not apply to facilities producing coke or coke gas.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 
    For questions about how the inflation adjustment factor is 
calculated--Wu-Lang Lee, RAS:R:TSBR, Internal Revenue Service, 1111 
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20224, Telephone Number (202) 
874-0531 (not a toll-free number).
    For all other questions about the credit or the reference price--
Jaime C. Park, CC:PSI:7, Internal Revenue Service, 1111 Constitution 
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20224, Telephone Number (202) 622-3120 (not 
a toll-free number).

    Dated: April 23, 2007.
William O'Shea,
Associate Chief Counsel (Passthroughs and Special Industries).
[FR Doc. E7-8747 Filed 5-7-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
## California Walnut B oard

California Walnut Commission

101 Parkshore Drive, Suite 250 Folsom, CA 95630

- 4726 (916) 932

- 7070

June 6 , 2012

Submitted electronically

Linda Irokawa

- Otani, Regulations Coordinator Office of Legislation and Policy Department of Pesticide Regulation 1001 I Street, P.O. Box 4015 Sacramento, CA 95812

- 4015

Subject: Comments on a Notice of Proposed Regulatory Action and Notice of Public Hearing On a Proposed Ozone State Implementation Plan Amendment regarding Amendment of Title 3, California Code of Regulation (3 CCR) sections 6452, 6452.2, and 6864; amend section 6452.4 and renumber to 6881; renumber section 6890 to 6864; and adopt sections 6558, 6577, 6880, 6883, 6884, and 6886.

Dear Ms. Irokawa

- Otani,

The California Walnut B oard (CWB) i s an active participant of the Pesticide AG

- SIP Workgroup and California Specialty Crops Council (CSCC). During recent discussions we learned one of

the a ctive i ngredients ( ai’s ) called oxy f luorfen (trade name Goal 2XL ) has been identified in the proposed regulation as a high VOC and faces limited or no application from May 1 to October

31st starting in 2014

.

O xyfluo r fen remains an important herbicide in walnut orchards

, especially during spring and

summer months to c ontrol weeds prior to harvest. The alternative low VOC oxyfluorfen, while acceptable in pre

- emergent application, appears unacceptable for post

- emergent usages unless it is combined with other herbicides or similar agents (Robert Van Steenwyk, UC Berkley)

. Studies to prove the efficacy of these low VOC oxyfluorfen combined with “kickers” are under way but have not been completed according to Brad Hanson, Cooperative Extension Weed Specialist, UC Davis.

Until these potential alternatives are investigate d and a science

- based solution can be found,

the CWB urges that an exemption to section 6884 section (b0 to include low rates of high

- VOC formulations of oxyfluorfen for spring and summer orchard floor weed control prior to harvest.

The California walnut industry consists of over 4

, 0 00 growers and 82 handlers (processors/marketers). They represent almost $1 billion in farm gate value and are one of California’s top export commodities

.

Thank you for considering my comments.

Sincerely,

Dennis A. Balint

Chief Executive Officer
Case No. 9,238.

#### MASON v. INGRAHAM.

[5 Ben. 81.] 1

District Court, E. D. New York.

March, 1871.

Pilots — Tender of Service — Half Pilotase— Agent of Vessel.

The pilotage law of New York provided, that in case of a tender of service by a pilot to a vessel, and a refusal of such service, half pilotage should be due and recoverable of the agent of the vessel. A pilot filed a libel on such a cause of action against a person, who was not at the time of the tender the consignee of the vessel, who did not act for her under a general employment, and who did not collect her freight. *Meld,*that, in order to charge a person with liability as agent, under the act, it is necessary to show that he had some connection with the vessel at the time, and that the defendant was not liable.

[Libel by Edward R. Mason against John S. Ingraham for the recovery of pilotage.]

BENEDICT, District Judge.

This is an action by a pilot to recover half pilotage of the defendant, as the agent of the bark R. B. Walker. It involves the same question of jurisdiction decided in the case of Banta v. McNeil [Case No. 966], to which reference is made for my opinion thereon. There is, however, another question in this case, which has not arisen in former half pilotage cases decided in this court. Here the right to recover is rested upon the state statute, which, it is claimed, creates a liability for half pilotage on behalf of the agent of the ship to which the tender is made; and it is only as agent that the defendant is sought to be held, as he was not master or part owner. Upon this point, it is sufficient to say that, in my opinion, it is at least necessary, in order to charge a person, in the capacity of agent, with a liability of this description, to show that he had some connection with the vessel. At the time of the pilot’s tender, the defendant was not the consignee of the vessel, nor did he act for her under any general employment. Her freight was not collected by him, nor does it appear that he was in any way connected with the vessel at the time the libellant’s cause of action arose.

The libel must, therefore, be dismissed.
**
Exhibit 31.1 

Certification of Senior Officer in Charge of the Servicing Function 

of the Servicer Pursuant to Rule 15d-14(d)

**CERTIFICATION**

I, KevinJ. Cullum, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Nissan Auto Receivables 2016-B Owner Trust(the “Exchange Act periodic reports”); 

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports; 

4. I amresponsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except asdisclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and 

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports onassessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by thefollowing unaffiliated party: U.S. Bank National Association 

Date: June 27, 2019 

 
By: 
/s/ Kevin J. Cullum
Kevin J. CullumPresident and Chief Executive Officer ofNissan Motor Acceptance Corporation(senior officer in charge of theservicing function)**