alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case No. 6,490a.

#### GODDARD v. CUNNINGHAM.

[16 Reporter, 7.] 1

Circuit Court, S. D. New York.

June 1, 1883.

Trial — Charge for Defendant — Evidence.

In an action for breach of a contract for the purchase of merchandise, where a finding .of the jury in favor of plaintiffs would be contrary to evidence it is not error for the court to instruct the jury to find a verdict for the defendant.

On motion for a new trial. The action was for damages for breach of a contract for the purchase of merchandise, and the de-fence was that the defendants were deprived of an opportunity to inspect the merchandise within a reasonable time. The court directed a verdict for defendants.

Chamberlain, Carter & Hornblower, for plaintiff.

Knox & Woodward, for defendants.

1

 [Reprinted by permission.]

WALLACE, Circuit Judge.

The instruction to the jury to find for the defendants was justified for the reason that a finding that the defendants were given a reasonable time for inspection of the merchandise after its delivery upon the dock would have been contrary to evidence. The defendants attempted to inspect it, but found it had been removed before the time which the plaintiff’s agent, by his letter of January lGth, had fixed himself as a reasonable tíme. In view of the plaintiff’s own understanding of what would be a reasonable time as expressed in that letter by his agent, an intelligent jury could have reached but one conclusion. That letter, in connection with the other facts of the transaction, made a case so strong for the defendants that it could not be overthrown. The defence that the plaintiff did not give the defendants a reasonable opportunity for the inspection was distinctly made in the answer, and the issue required the plaintiff to be prepared with the evidence, which he did not produce, and which he now calls newly-discovered evidence. Motion denied.
Before the Third Division,

November 14, 1945

No. 50661.

#### Protests 95806-K, etc., of A. Germano & Sons et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

At the trial it was stipulated that the reliquidation of the entries herein involved is similar in all material respects to that in *Bel Paese Bales Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(15 Cust. Ct. .7, C. D.. 932). In accordance with stipulation' and following the decision cited, judgment was entered directing the collector to reliquidate the entries herein, refunding the duty established to have been taken in excess, in accordance with the decision and judgment in Abstract 45176.
No. 55433.

#### Air Clearance Assn., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 147844—K, etc. (New York).

*400Opinion by

Oliver, O. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of synthetic stones the same in all material respects as those the subject of *S. Nathan & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(37 C. C. P. A. 99, C. A. D. 426), the claim at 10 percent under paragraph 1528 was sustained.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 336 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 336

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 11, 2008

      Received and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
  Honoring the sacrifices and contributions made by disabled American 
                               veterans.

Whereas the people of the United States have a sincere appreciation and respect 
        for members of the Armed Forces who suffered disabling wounds while 
        serving in the United States military;
Whereas there are approximately 2,800,000 veterans receiving benefits from the 
        Department of Veterans Affairs for disabilities incurred while defending 
        our Nation;
Whereas the current wars in Iraq and Afghanistan have resulted in 30,000 
        disabled American veterans as a direct result of combat operations, and 
        even more so from conditions simulating war, instrumentalities of war, 
        and hazardous duty in combat-related training;
Whereas families throughout every State in America have been affected by loved 
        ones returning disabled from their service to their Nation;
Whereas the American public supports the brave men and women who have defended 
        the freedom of all in America;
Whereas America owes its very integrity to her sons and daughters in uniform, 
        who risk the most for the least, and who epitomize the extraordinary 
        meaning of service, sacrifice, and, most importantly, freedom; and
Whereas Americans should remember and honor our men and women in uniform who 
        incurred disabilities while defending our Nation with a Disabled 
        American Veterans Week: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That Congress--
            (1) recognizes the great sacrifices made by disabled 
        veterans and their families;
            (2) calls on the people of the United States to honor all 
        disabled American veterans and the freedom for which they 
        sacrificed;
            (3) encourages local, State, and national organizations and 
        governmental institutions to participate in the effort to honor 
        the sacrifices of America's disabled veterans; and
            (4) supports the goals and ideals of Disabled American 
        Veterans Week.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 10, 2008.

            Attest:

                                            LORRAINE C. MILLER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-2880

DORIS F. SMITH, Widow of Reeland T. Smith,

Petitioner,

versus

DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board.

(92-778-BLA)

Submitted: May 16, 1996 Decided: May 28, 1996

Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Doris F. Smith, Petitioner Pro Se. Cathryn Celeste Helm, Christian

P. Barber, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Washington, D.C., for

Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks review of the Benefits Review Board's decision

and order and decision and order on reconsideration affirming the

administrative law judge's denial of black lung benefits pursuant

to 30 U.S.C.A. §§ 901-945 (West 1986 & Supp. 1995). Our review of

the record discloses that the Board's decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm on the reasoning of the Board. Smith v. Director, Office of

Workers' Compensation Programs, No. 92-778-BLA (B.R.B. Aug. 25,

1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
### Ground-water conditions in the Dutch Flats area, Scotts Bluff and Sioux Counties, Nebraska, with a section on chemical quality of the ground water

By: H. M. BabcockF. N. VisherW. H. Durum

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/cir126

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf) 
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
| (logo) WELLS  FARGO | **Commercial  Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084,  8th Fl  401 South Tryon Street  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|---------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

 

Referenceis hereby made to that certain Trust and Servicing Agreement dated as of March18, 2016, by and among GS MORTGAGE SECURITIES CORPORATION II, as Depositor,WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Servicer, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONALASSOCIATION, as Special Servicer, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, asCertificate Administrator and WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, asTrustee, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series2016-RENT (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein nototherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuantto Section 11.7 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President ofCommercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1.       Areview of the activities of the Servicer during the period from January 1, 2017through December 31, 2017 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance perthe Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and

 

2.       To thebest of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all ofits obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

INWITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28thday of February 2018.

 

 

/s/Daniel Bober

DanielBober 

ExecutiveVice President

WellsFargo Bank

 

| Wells Fargo Bank,  N.A. | (logo) Together  we’ll go far |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
Appendix 4.2

US Department of the Interior Comments on the Kansa s

Regional Haze SIP
# C_2016111EN.01002301.xml

| 29.3.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 111/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.3.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 111/23

---

Judgment of the General Court of 19 February 2016 — Infinite Cycle Works v OHIM — Chance Good Ent. (INFINITY)

(Case T-30/15) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community word mark INFINITY - Earlier Community word mark INFINI - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2016/C 111/27)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Infinite Cycle Works Ltd (Delta, Canada) (represented by: E. Manresa Medina and J.M. Manresa Medina, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: M. Rajh, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the General Court: Chance Good Ent. Co., Ltd (Changhua, Taiwan) (represented by: P. Rath and W. Festl-Wietek, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 30 October 2014 (Case R 2308/2013-2) relating to opposition proceedings between Chance Good Ent. Co., Ltd, and Infinite Cycle Works Ltd.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Infinite Cycle Works Ltd to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Infinite Cycle Works Ltd to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 89, 16.3.2015.

1

---
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 308 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 308

   Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the National Peace 
                      Officers' Memorial Service.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 4, 2008

 Ms. Norton (for herself, Mr. Graves, Mr. Hoyer, Mr. Cummings, Mr. Van 
Hollen, Mr. Wynn, Mr. Tom Davis of Virginia, Mr. Moran of Virginia, and 
  Mr. Wolf) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
     referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
   Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the National Peace 
                      Officers' Memorial Service.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. USE OF CAPITOL GROUNDS FOR NATIONAL PEACE OFFICERS' MEMORIAL 
              SERVICE.

    (a) In General.--The Grand Lodge of the Fraternal Order of Police 
and its auxiliary (in this resolution referred to as the ``sponsor'') 
shall be permitted to sponsor a public event, the 27th annual National 
Peace Officers' Memorial Service (in this resolution referred to as the 
``event''), on the Capitol Grounds, in order to honor the law 
enforcement officers who died in the line of duty during 2007.
    (b) Date of Event.--The event shall be held on May 15, 2008, or on 
such other date as the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the 
Committee on Rules and Administration of the Senate jointly designate.

SEC. 2. TERMS AND CONDITIONS.

    (a) In General.--Under conditions to be prescribed by the Architect 
of the Capitol and the Capitol Police Board, the event shall be--
            (1) free of admission charge and open to the public; and
            (2) arranged not to interfere with the needs of Congress.
    (b) Expenses and Liabilities.--The sponsor shall assume full 
responsibility for all expenses and liabilities incident to all 
activities associated with the event.

SEC. 3. EVENT PREPARATIONS.

    Subject to the approval of the Architect of the Capitol, the 
sponsor is authorized to erect upon the Capitol Grounds such stage, 
sound amplification devices, and other related structures and 
equipment, as may be required for the event.

SEC. 4. ENFORCEMENT OF RESTRICTIONS.

    The Capitol Police Board shall provide for enforcement of the 
restrictions contained in section 5104(c) of title 40, United States 
Code, concerning sales, advertisements, displays, and solicitations on 
the Capitol Grounds, as well as other restrictions applicable to the 
Capitol Grounds, in connection with the event.
                                 <all>
```
No. 46949.

#### Protests 941223-G, etc., of Somerset Importers, Ltd., et al. (Baltimore, etc.).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Department of Corrections, :

State Correctional Institution : CASES CONSOLIDATED

at Frackville, :

Petitioner :

:

v. : No. 1203 C.D. 2020

:

Ralph E. Lynn :

(State Civil Service Commission), :

Respondent :

Governor's Office of Administratio n, :

Petitioner :

:

v. : No. 1286 C.D. 2020

:

Ralph E. Lynn :

(State Civil Service Commission), :

Respondent :

PER CURIAM O R D E R

NOW, March 31, 2022

, upon consideration of Intervenor

Governor’s Office of Administration ’s application for re consideration

, and

R espondent’s answer in response thereto, the application is denied.
# C_2016392EN.01003402.xml

| 24.10.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 392/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.10.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 392/34

---

Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2016 — Puma v EUIPO — Gemma Group (Representation of a bounding feline)

(Case T-159/15) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for an EU figurative mark representing a bounding feline - Earlier international figurative marks representing a bounding feline - Relative ground for refusal - Sound administration - Proof of the reputation of the earlier marks - Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2016/C 392/43)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Puma SE (Herzogenaurach, Germany) (represented by: P. González-Bueno Catalán de Ocón, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: initially P. Bullock, and subsequently D. Hanf, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Gemma Group Srl (Cerasolo Ausa, Italy)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 19 December 2014 (Case R 1207/2014-5), relating to opposition proceedings between Puma and Gemma Group.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 19 December 2014 (Case R 1207/2014-5); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 19 December 2014 (Case R 1207/2014-5);

| 2. | Orders EUIPO to pay the costs, including those incurred by Puma SE. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders EUIPO to pay the costs, including those incurred by Puma SE.

---

(1)  OJ C 171, 26.5.2015.

1

---
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.28

                               TRANSFER AGREEMENT


Effective May 20th, 1999.

BETWEEN:

           EBANX.COM (ISLE OF MAN) LIMITED, an Isle of Man corporation
                                                                ("eBanx.com")

AND:

         CYBEROAD GAMING CORPORATION, a St Kim West Indies corporation.

                                                                 ("Cyberoad")

1.    Cyberoad hereby agree to transfer 100% ownership of Ebanx Limited of
      Nevada USA to eBanx.com for $10.00 US and other consideration hereby
      acknowledged as being received.

2.    This agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which
      shall be deemed an original and all of which shall constitute one and the
      same agreement.

                                  ACKNOWLEDGED

  EBANX.COM (ISLE OF MAN)                CYBEROAD GAMING CORP.

  Per:  /s/ DAVID HARRIS                 Per:  /s/ LAWRENCE COFIELD
      ------------------------------         ---------------------------------
  Name:    David Harris                  Name:    Lawrence Cofield
  Title:   Director                      Title:   Director
Exhibit 32.1








Certification








Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63


of Title 18, United States Code)





Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.  1350), the undersigned officer of SonomaWest Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify that:





The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2010 (the “Form 10-Q”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated: February 11, 2011











/s/ Craig R. Stapleton


Craig R. Stapleton,


Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
|  |  |
|--|--|

|  |
|--|

|   |
|--------|

| FHWA > Vehicle Travel Information System (VTRIS) |
|------------------------------------------------------|

| - Highway Performance Monitoring System
- Motor Fuel & Highway Trust Fund
- Highway Finance Data & Information
- National Household Travel Survey
- Travel Monitoring | Vehicle Travel Information System (VTRIS)- VTRIS Users Guide : The revised VTRIS Users Guide consists of the Manual, Appendix, and Database Structure Supplementary Tables. All are in WordPerfect format. Additionally, the Appendix and Structure Tables are available in HTML for quick reference. Select which parts of the Users Guide you wish to view from the table below:
Complete VTRIS User's Guide (includes Database Table Structure and Appendix)EXE (extracts to WordPerfect files; 0.3 mb)PDF (0.6 mb)VTRIS User's Guide - ManualWordPerfect (1.4 mb)PDF (06. mb)VTRIS User's Guide - TVT Database StructuresWordPerfect (80 kb)HTMLVTRIS User's Guide - AppendixWordPerfect (53 kb)HTML- Truck Weight Study Reports |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                                                                                                                                          | Updated: 10/12/2022                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  |   |

FHWA HomePolicy Information

**Federal Highway Administration**