alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 89 (Wednesday, May 9, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 26443]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-8829]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration <greek-i> 10862 and <greek-i> 10863]


Texas Disaster <greek-i> TX-00251

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major 
disaster for the State of Texas (FEMA-1697-DR), dated 05/01/2007.
    Incident: Severe Storms and Tornadoes.
    Incident Period: 04/21/2007 through 04/24/2007.
    Effective Date: 05/01/2007.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 07/02/2007.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 02/01/2008.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the President's major disaster declaration on 05/01/2007, applications 
for disaster loans may be filed at the address listed above or other 
locally announced locations.
    The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected 
by the disaster:

Primary Counties (Physical Damage and Economic Injury Loans):
    Maverick, Moore, Swisher.
Contiguous Counties (Economic Injury Loans Only):
    Texas, Armstrong, Briscoe, Carson, Castro, Dallam, Dimmit, Floyd, 
Hale, Hansford, Hartley, Hutchinson, Kinney, Oldham, Potter, Randal, 
Sherman, Uvalde, Webb, Zavala.

    The Interest Rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Physical Damage:
    Homeowners With Credit Available Elsewhere...............      5.750
    Homeowners Without Credit Available Elsewhere............      2.875
    Businesses With Credit Available Elsewhere...............      8.000
    Other (Including Non-Profit Organizations) With Credit         5.250
     Available Elsewhere.....................................
    Businesses And Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit         4.000
     Available Elsewhere.....................................
For Economic Injury:
    Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives Without           4.000
     Credit Available Elsewhere..............................
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 10862C and
  for economic injury is 108630.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

Herbert L. Mitchell,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
 [FR Doc. E7-8829 Filed 5-8-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
114 STAT. 1308 PUBLIC LAW 106–334—OCT. 19, 2000

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 4448:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 146 (2000):

Sept. 6, considered and passed House.

Oct. 6, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 106–334

106th Congress

An Act

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 3500 Dolfield

Avenue in Baltimore, Maryland, as the ‘‘Judge Robert Bernard Watts, Sr. Post

Office Building’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

The facility of the United States Postal Service located at

3500 Dolfield Avenue in Baltimore, Maryland, shall be known and

designated as the ‘‘Judge Robert Bernard Watts, Sr. Post Office

Building’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the facility referred to

in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Judge

Robert Bernard Watts, Sr. Post Office Building’’.

Approved October 19, 2000.

Oct. 19, 2000

[H.R. 4448]
### Surface water supply of the United States, 1918, Part II, South Atlantic slope and eastern Gulf of Mexico basins

By: Water Resources Division, U.S. Geological Survey

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp472

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 80 (Thursday, April 26, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 20725-20726]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-7949]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 117

[CGD07-06-050]
RIN 1625-AA09


Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Venetian Causeway (West) 
Drawbridge, Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway, Mile 1088.6, and Venetian 
Causeway (East) Drawbridge, Biscayne Bay, Miami, Miami-Dade County, FL; 
Correction

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On April 16, 2007, the Coast Guard published in the Federal 
Register a final rule that changes the operating regulations governing 
the Venetian Causeway (West) drawbridge, Atlantic Intracoastal 
Waterway, mile 1088.6, and Venetian Causeway (East) drawbridge, 
Biscayne Bay, Miami, Miami-Dade County, Florida. Inadvertently, under

[[Page 20726]]

the second amendatory instruction, the wrong section number was used in 
the section heading. This document corrects that incorrect section 
number.

DATES: This rule is effective May 16, 2007.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Michael Lieberum, Seventh Coast 
Guard District, Bridge Branch, telephone number 305-415-6744.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the final rule, published on April 16, 
2007, (72 FR 18885), the Coast Guard changed the operating schedule of 
the Venetian Causeway (West) Drawbridge, Atlantic Intracoastal 
Waterway, Mile 1088.6, and Venetian Causeway (East) Drawbridge, 
Biscayne Bay, Miami, Miami-Dade County, FL. In the second amendatory 
instruction, the amendatory instruction directs a revision to Sec.  
117.261, however, in the heading to the section being revised, the 
section number is listed as Sec.  117.287, even though the heading used 
is that listed for Sec.  117.261 (Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway from 
St. Mary's to Key Largo). This correction fixes the error in the 
section number listed in the section heading.

PART 117--[CORRECTED]

0
In FR Doc. E7-7157 published on April 16, 2007, (72 FR 18885), make the 
following correction. On page 18886, in the third column, change the 
section heading under amendatory instruction 2 to read as follows:


Sec.  117.261  Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway from St. Marys River to 
Key Largo.

    Dated: April 19, 2007.
Steve Venckus,
Chief, Office of Regulations and Administrative Law.
 [FR Doc. E7-7949 Filed 4-25-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P
#### B. Altman & Co. *v.*United States

No. 6768.

Entry No. 726814, etc.

Invoices dated Hawick, Scotland, October 10, 1941, etc.

Certified October 11, 1941, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., November 26, 1941, etc. '

(Decided January 15, 1947)

*Marlow & Hines*for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Cole, Judge (Abstract):

These appeals for reappraisement of various items of merchandise concern the so-called British purchase tax, described in the law of the United Kingdom entitled, “Finance (No. 2) Act 1940 3 & 4 Geo. 6 Ch. 48 ” The said tax was held not to be an item to be included in foreign value as defined in section 402 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended by the Customs Administrative Act of 1938 (19 U. S. C. §1402 (c)). *United States*v. *Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp.,*33 C. C. P. A. 183, C. A. D. 334.

A written stipulation of fact, submitting these eases, is sufficient to show that export value, section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. § 1402 (d)), is the proper basis for appraisement of the instant merchandise, and that such statutory values for the articles in question are the appraised values, less additions made by the importer on entry because of advances in similar cases.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 85 (Thursday, May 3, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 24654]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-8473]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 5783]


Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Encompassing the Globe: Portugal and the World in the 
16th and 17th Centuries''

ACTION: Notice, correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On January 24, 2007, notice was published on page 3189 of the 
Federal Register (volume 72, number 15) of determinations made by the 
Department of State pertaining to the exhibit, ``Encompassing the 
Globe: Portugal and the World in the 16th and 17th Centuries.'' The 
referenced notice is corrected as to additional objects to be included 
in the exhibition. Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of 
October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 
of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 
1998 (112 Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), 
Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of 
Authority No. 236 of October 19, 1999, as amended, and Delegation of 
Authority No. 257 of April 15, 2003 [68 FR 19875], I hereby determine 
that the objects to be included in the exhibition ``Encompassing the 
Globe: Portugal and the World in the 16th and 17th Centuries'', 
imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, 
are of cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to a 
loan agreement with the foreign owner or custodian. I also determine 
that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at the Arthur M. 
Sackler Gallery, Washington, DC, from on or about June 23, 2007, until 
on or about September 16, 2007, and at possible additional exhibitions 
or venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. Public 
Notice of these Determinations is ordered to be published in the 
Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Wolodymyr Sulzynsky, Attorney-
Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State 
(telephone: (202) 453-8050). The address is U.S. Department of State, 
SA-44, 301 4th Street, SW., Room 700, Washington, DC 20547-0001.

    Dated: April 25, 2007.
C. Miller Crouch,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural 
Affairs, Department of State.
 [FR Doc. E7-8473 Filed 5-2-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
# C_2016270EN.01004501.xml

| 25.7.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 270/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.7.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 270/45

---

Order of the General Court of 8 June 2016 — Kohrener Landmolkerei and DHG v Commission

(Case T-178/15) (1)

1

((System of traditional specialities guaranteed - Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 - Letter from the Commission informing the competent national authorities of their late lodging of their opposition measure - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law))

(2016/C 270/51)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Kohrener Landmolkerei GmbH (Penig, Germany) and DHG Deutsche Heumilchgesellschaft mbH (Frohburg, Germany) (represented by: A. Wagner, lawyer)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Guillem Carrau and G. von Rintelen, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application based on Article 263 TFEU and asking for annulment of the decision contained in the letter of 9 February 2015 from the Director of Directorate B ‘Multilateral relations and quality policy’ of the Commission’s ‘Agriculture and rural development’ Directorate General, with the reference Ares (2015)529719, informing the competent German authorities that their opposition measure under Article 51(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ 2012 L 343, p. 1), which was lodged on 5 January 2015, was submitted after the deadline.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as being manifestly lacking any foundation in law. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as being manifestly lacking any foundation in law.

| 2. | Kohrener Landmolkerei GmbH and DHG Deutsche Heumilchgesellschaft mbH shall bear their own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Kohrener Landmolkerei GmbH and DHG Deutsche Heumilchgesellschaft mbH shall bear their own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 245, 27.7.2015.

1

---
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 89 (Wednesday, May 9, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26335-26336]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-8836]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

    The Department of Commerce (DOC) will submit to the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) for clearance the following proposal for 
collection of information under the emergency provisions of the 
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).
    Agency: Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS).
    Title: Thermal Imaging Camera Reporting.
    Agency Form Number: None.
    OMB Approval Number: None.
    Type of Request: Emergency submission.
    Burden Hours: 60.
    Average Time Per Response: 1 hour.
    Number of Respondents: 30.
    Needs and Uses: The U.S. Government (USG) is removing the export 
licensing requirement for certain thermal imaging cameras to certain 
destinations. A new biannual reporting requirement will be imposed to 
allow the USG to verify that the cameras are continuing to be sold to 
appropriate end-users and that the relaxation in controls is not 
jeopardizing U.S. national security or foreign policy interests.
    Affected Public: Businesses or other for-profit institutions.
    Frequency: Biannually.

[[Page 26336]]

    Respondents Obligation: Required to obtain or retain benefits.
    OMB Desk Officer: David Rostker, (202)395-3897.
    Copies of the above information collection proposal can be obtained 
by calling or writing Diana Hynek, Departmental Paperwork Clearance 
Officer, (202) 482-0266, Department of Commerce, Room 6625, 14th and 
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230.
    Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information 
collection should be sent by June 15, 2007 to David Rostker, OMB Desk 
Officer, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a3e7c2d5cac7fcf1ccd0d7c8c6d1e3cccec18dc6ccd38dc4ccd5"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a3e7c2d5cac7fcf1ccd0d7c8c6d1e3cccec18dc6ccd38dc4ccd5">[email protected]</span></a>, or Fax number, (202) 395-7285.

    Dated: May 3, 2007.
Gwellnar Banks,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief Information Officer.
 [FR Doc. E7-8836 Filed 5-8-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DT-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 245 

Commending the National Renewable Energy Laboratory for its work of 

promoting energy efficiency for 30. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 1, 2007 

Mr. PERLMUTTER (for himself, Ms. DEGETTE, Mr. UDALL of Colorado, and 

Mr. SALAZAR) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on Science and Technology 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Commending the National Renewable Energy Laboratory for 

its work of promoting energy efficiency for 30. 

Whereas, in 1977, the Solar Energy Research Institute 

opened and was designated a National Laboratory of the 

United States Department of Energy; 

Whereas, in September 1991, President George H.W. Bush 

changed the institute’s name to the National Renewable 

Energy Laboratory (‘‘NREL’’); 

Whereas the NREL is the principle research laboratory for 

the United States Department of Energy’s Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy and also provides 

research expertise for the Office of Science and the Office 

of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability; 


cnoel on PRODPC60 with BILLS
2 

•HCON 245 IH 

Whereas the NREL is the Nation’s, and the world’s, preeminent laboratory for renewable energy and energy efficiency research and development; 

Whereas renewable energy and energy efficiency technologies 

are key to creating a clean energy future for not only the 

United States, but the world; 

Whereas the NREL’s focused research and development capabilities are positioned to advance national energy goals 

by developing innovations to change the way we power 

our homes and businesses, and fuel our cars; 

Whereas the NREL has worked vigorously through research 

and development to develop wind energy resulting in innovative designs, larger turbines, and increased efficiencies leading to dramatic reductions in energy costs; 

Whereas the NREL has also developed hydrogen energy scenarios that could be used to power the future and develop 

hydrogen infrastructure and delivery systems; and 

Whereas the NREL has developed biomass research technology, which provides biomass industries with rapid analytical tools for making the highest value applications of 

biomass or analyzing biomass: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That Congress— 

3 (1) commends the National Renewable Energy 

4 Laboratory for its work of promoting energy effi5 ciency for 30 years and seeking other avenues of en6 ergy independence because it enhances our national 

7 security, sustains our environment and creates jobs; 


cnoel on PRODPC60 with BILLS
3 

•HCON 245 IH 

1 (2) recognizes the achievements of the scientists 

2 and employees of the NREL and their exemplary 

3 service to the United States for 30 years; and 

4 (3) directs the Clerk of the House to transmit 

5 a copy of this resolution to the NREL for appro6 priate display. 

Æ 


cnoel on PRODPC60 with BILLS
# C_2017022EN.01003102.xml

| 23.1.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 22/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.1.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 22/31

---

Judgment of the General Court of 1 December 2016 — EK/servicegroup v EUIPO (FERLI)

(Case T-775/15) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Application for the EU word mark FERLI - Requirement of clarity - Article 28 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Rights of the defence - Second sentence of Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009))

(2017/C 022/42)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: EK/servicegroup eG (Bielefeld, Germany) (represented by: T. Müller and T. A. Müller, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: S. Hanne, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 28 October 2015 (Case R 1233/2015-4), concerning an application for registration of the word sign FERLI as an EU trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders EK/servicegroup eG to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders EK/servicegroup eG to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 78, 28.2.2016.

1

---
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Wilhelm Anton STALKNEGT, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 04-50088.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 12, 2005.*

Decided Sept. 16, 2005.

Elizabeth R. Yang, Esq., USLA—Office of the U.S. Attorney, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Ronald O. Kaye, Kaye McLane & Bednarski, LLP, Pasadena, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.

*848Before: REINHARDT, RYMER and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Wilhelm Anton Stalknegt appeals his 132-month sentence imposed following a guilty plea to being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we remand for resentencing.

Stalknegt contends that the district court erred in imposing an enhancement under the Armed Career Criminal Act (“ACCA”), 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(1). Specifically, Stalknegt contends that his 1982 conviction for burglary does not qualify as a prior violent felony conviction under the ACCA. We conclude that the 1982 conviction satisfies all the elements of generic burglary as set forth by the Supreme Court in *Taylor v. United States,*495 U.S. 575, 601, 110 S.Ct. 2143, 109 L.Ed.2d 607 (1990), and that the district court properly determined that this conviction constitutes a “violent felony” for purposes of the ACCA. *See Shepard v. United States,*— U.S. -, ---, -, 125 S.Ct. 1254, 1259-60, 1262, 161 L.Ed.2d 205 (2005); *United States v. Williams,*47 F.3d 993, 995 (9th Cir.1995).

However, Stalknegt was sentenced below the fifteen-year mandatory minimum required by the ACCA, and pursuant to the then-mandatory Sentencing Guidelines. We cannot determine from the record whether the district court would have imposed a materially different sentence if it had known that the Guidelines were advisory rather than mandatory. Accordingly, we remand this case to the district court for the limited purpose of permitting it to consider Stalknegt’s sentence in accordance with *United States v. Ameline,*409 F.3d 1073, 1084-85 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc). *See United States v. Moreno-Hernandez,*419 F.3d 906 (9th Cir.2005).

REMANDED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.