alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NO. 13-C-313

BOBBY MILLER and ) IN THE DISTRICT COURT

THYRA MILLER )

)

v. ) OF

)

LEORISS THOMAS ) CASS COUNTY, TEXAS

NOTICE OF APPEAL

TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT:

Comes now LEORISS THOMAS, pursuant to Rule 25.1 of the Tex. R. App. P., and files 

this his Notice of Appeal.

I.

The case was filed in the 5th Judicial District Court of Cass County, Texas and styled Bobby

Miller and Thyra Miller v. Leoriss Thomas, Cause No. 13-C-313. The judgment that is being

appealed from was entered on August 5, 2015.

II.

Leoriss Thomas desires to appeal to the Sixth District Court of Appeals sitting in Texarkana.

III.

This notice is filed by Leoriss Thomas, the Defendant in the trial court.

Respectfully submitted,

 /s/ John R. Mercy 

John R. Mercy

Texas State Bar No. 13947200

MERCY p CARTER p TIDWELL, L.L.P.

1724 Galleria Oaks Drive

Texarkana, TX 75503

Telephone: (903) 794-9419

Facsimile: (903) 794-1268

E-mail: jmercy@texarkanalawyers.com

ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANT

FILED FOR RECORD

CASS COUNTY, TEXAS

10/20/2015 4:28:13 PM

JAMIE ALBERTSON

DISTRICT CLERK

ACCEPTED

06-15-00095-CV

SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS

TEXARKANA, TEXAS

11/2/2015 4:43:16 PM

DEBBIE AUTREY

CLERK

 FILED IN 6th COURT OF APPEALS TEXARKANA, TEXAS 11/3/2015 9:29:00 AM DEBBIE AUTREY Clerk
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on October 20, 2015 a true and correct copy of the foregoing Notice of

Appeal was forwarded to counsel of record for Plaintiffs by the Electronic Service Provider, if

registered; otherwise by email, as follows:

Mr. D. Scott Carlile

THE CARLILE LAW FIRM, LLP

400 South Alamo

Marshall, TX 75670 

Email: scarlile@carlilelawfirm.com

/s/ John R. Mercy 

John R. Mercy

Notice of Appeal - Page 2
### Reconnaissance of the ground-water resources of the Wheatland Flats area, Wyoming

By: Robert Thomas Littleton

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/cir70

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

No abstract available.

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
No. 49443.

#### Protests 937269-G, etc., of Morris Shoenthal, Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

The record showed that certain of the merchandise consists of ramie and cellophane (racello) hats similar to those involved in Abstract 47291, and that other items consist of hemp hats similar to those involved in. *United States*v. *Armand Schwab*(30 C. C. P. A. 72, C. A. D. 218), which records *322were admitted in evidence herein. In accordance therewith these items were held dutiable at only 25 percent under paragraph 1504 (b) (1) as claimed.
(Reap. Dec. 9034)

Entry No. 2389.

#### John S. Connor, a/c Overseas Metal & Ore Corporation *v.*United States

(Decided December 20, 1957)

Plaintiff not represented by counsel.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Chief Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement relates to certain ferro manganese exported from France and entered at the port of Baltimore, Md.

The case is before me on a written stipulation of submission reading as follows:

> It is stipulated and agreed by the undersigned, subject to the approval of the Court, that the market value or price at the time of exportation of the involved 1,000 drums Ferro Manganese, at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale for home consumption to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, is as follows:

> As to invoice number 1 containing 500 drums Ferro Manganese: French francs 171,540 per metric ton of manganese, plus packing.

> As to invoice number 2 containing 500 drums Ferro Manganese: French francs 171,400 per metric ton of manganese, plus packing.

> It is further agreed that there was no higher export value for merchandise such or similar to that herein involved at the time of exportation thereof.

> It is further agreed that this case may be submitted for decision on the foregoing stipulation.

On the agreed facts, I find foreign value, as defined in section 402 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, to be the proper basis for appraisement of the merchandise in question, and hold such statutory value for the items covered by the invoices relating to the shipment under consideration to be as follows:

(1) The statutory foreign value for the 500 drums of ferro manganese covered by invoice number 1 is French francs 171,540 per metric ton of manganese, plus packing.

(2) The statutory foreign value for the 500 drums of ferro manganese covered by invoice number 2 is French francs 171,400 per metric ton of manganese, plus packing.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
No. 53204.

#### Jay Thorpe et al. *v.*United States,

protests 143982-K(A), etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
#### Kenneth W. BREWER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Mike MULLIN, Warden, OSP; Robert Berry, Unit Manager; Lieutenant Whala, Corporal Hance, and Sergeant Morgan, Correctional Officers, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 04-7112.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

Aug. 3, 2005.

*110J. Kevin Behrens, Oklahoma Attorney General, Oklahoma City, OK, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before EBEL, McKAY, and HENRY, Circuit Judges.

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

MONROE G. McKAY, Circuit Judge.

After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

This is a *pro se*state prisoner civil rights appeal. Mr. Brewer filed a complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and sought declaratory relief, compensatory damages, and punitive damages for constitutional violations which allegedly occurred during his incarceration at the Oklahoma State Reformatory in Granite, Oklahoma. The alleged violations stemmed from a violent attack by one group of inmates on another group of which Mr. Brewer was a member.

Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment alleging, *inter alia,*that Mr. Brewer failed to exhaust his administrative remedies. The district court ordered a report pursuant to *Martinez v. Aaron, 570*F.2d 317 (10th Cir.1978). After considering the parties’ briefs, aided by the *Martinez*report, the district court granted Defendants’ motion and dismissed the case without prejudice because Mr. Brewer failed to exhaust his administrative remedies. Mr. Brewer now appeals to this court.

After a thorough review of the briefs, the relevant law, and the record, we agree with the district court that Mr. Brewer has failed to exhaust the available formal grievance procedure (the Inmate/Offender Grievance Process) on his claim. Therefore, for substantially the same reasons as set forth in the district court’s well-reasoned September 21, 2004, Order, we hold that no relief is available to Mr. Brewer pursuant to § 1983.

The decision of the trial court is affirmed. We remind Mr. Brewer that because his motion to proceed without prepayment of the appellate filing fee was granted, he must continue making partial payments on court fees and costs previously assessed until such have been paid in full.

AFFIRMED.

*

 This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.
-82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72

 36

 38

 40

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

06/19

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 19 Jun 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 39.06 N 76.88 W Meters AGL

★

■

■

■

■

★

■ ■ ■ ■

★

●

●

●

●

★

● ●

●

●
Exhibit 32.1


                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                                (18 U.S.C. 1350)


     In connection with the Report of Competitive Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 31, 2008, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
John B. Nano, Chairman, President, Chief Executive Officer, Interim Chief
Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that to my
knowledge:

     1.   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
          or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


                                   /s/ John B. Nano
                                   ----------------
                                   John B. Nano
                                   Chairman, President, Chief Executive Officer,
                                   Interim Chief Financial Officer and Chief
                                   Accounting Officer

                                   December 12, 2008









                  *
                *****
              **-----**
            **-----       COMPETITIVE
          ****----        TECHNOLOGIES
            **=====       Unlocking the Potential of Innovation (R)
              **=====**
                *****
                  *  (R)  Technology Transfer and Licensing Services









                            www.competitivetech.net




                                    Page 26
** **

| CohnReznick LLP |  CohnReznick                                |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------|
| cohnreznick.com | ADVISORY ● ASSURANCE ● TAX |

 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

To CWCapital Asset Management LLC

 

We have examined management of CWCapital Asset Management LLC (“CWCAM”)’s assertion that CWCAM complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”)’s Regulation AB for the commercial mortgage-backed securitization trusts included in the accompanying Management’s Assertion on Compliance with Regulation AB Criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2019. CWCAM’s management is responsible for its assertion. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assertion about CWCAM’s compliance with the specified requirements based on our examination. 

 

Management has determined that the criteria set forth in Sections 1122 (d)(1)(iii), (d)(3)(i)(B), (d)(3)(i)(C), (d)(3)(i)(D), (d)(3)(ii), (d)(3)(iii), (d)(3)(iv), (d)(4)(v), (d)(4)(ix), (d)(4)(x), (d)(4)(xi), (d)(4)(xii), (d)(4)(xiii), (d)(4)(xiv), and (d)(4)(xv) are not applicable to the activities performed by CWCAM, as a special servicer, with respect to CWCAM’s Platform. The commercial mortgage-backed securities transactions covered by this Platform are those specified in Appendix B in the accompanying Management’s Assertion on Compliance with Regulation AB Criteria. 

 

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the examination to obtain reasonable assurance about whether management’s assertion about compliance with the specified requirements is fairly stated, in all material respects. An examination involves performing procedures to obtain evidence about whether management’s assertion is fairly stated, in all material respects. The nature, timing, and extent of the procedures selected depend on our judgment, including an assessment of the risks of material misstatement of management’s assertion, whether due to fraud or error. We believe that the evidence we obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

 

Our examination does not provide a legal determination on CWCAM’s compliance with the specified requirements. 

 

In our opinion, management’s assertion that CWCAM complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the U.S. SEC’s Regulation AB for the commercial mortgage-backed securitization trusts included in the accompanying Management’s Assertion on Compliance with Regulation AB Criteria is fairly stated, in all material respects. 

 

|  /s/ CohnReznick LLP |   |
|--------------------------------|--------|
| Bethesda, Maryland             |   |
| February 25, 2020              |   |
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 86 (Friday, May 4, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 25304]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-8533]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisition of Shares of Bank or 
Bank Holding Companies

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. 
The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth 
in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the office of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than May 21, 2007.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia (Michael E. Collins, Senior 
Vice President) 100 North 6th Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19105-
1521:
    1. J. Donald Steele, Jr., and Joanne K. Steele, Lewisburg, 
Pennsylvania; to acquire voting shares of Northumberland Bancorp, 
Northumberland, Pennsylvania, and thereby indirectly acquire voting 
shares of The Northumberland National Bank, Northumberland, 
Pennsylvania.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (Glenda Wilson, Community 
Affairs Officer) 411 Locust Street, St. Louis, Missouri 63166-2034:
    1. Peter Mahurin, Bowling Green, Kentucky, and Ben Lovell Cundiff, 
Cadiz, Kentucky, individually, and as a group in concert with Damon 
Salvatore Vitale, Bowling Green, Kentucky, and Charles Lester Key, 
Franklin, Kentucky, to gain control of Jackson Financial Corporation, 
Mayfield, Kentucky, and thereby indirectly gain control of FNB Bank, 
Inc., Mayfield, Kentucky.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, May 1, 2007.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. E7-8533 Filed 5-3-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Indian Affairs 

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior. 

# ACTION:

Correction to notice.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Bureau of Indian Affairs published in the                         **Federal Register**                         of April 2, 2007, a notice informing the public that the Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs proclaimed approximately 63.52 acres, more or less, as the Jena Band of Choctaw Reservation for the Jena Band of Choctaw Indians of Louisiana (Jena Band). The land description as published contained an error. This action corrects that error.                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ben Burshia, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Division of Real Estate Services, Mail Stop 4639-MIB, 1849 C Street, NW., Washington, DC 20240, Telephone (202) 208-7737. 

## Correction 

In the notice document, FR Doc E7-6049, beginning on page 15712, in the issue of Monday, April 2, 2007, make the following correction: 

On page 15712, in the third column, second paragraph, fourth line, “17'41” east” should read “18'41” east”. 

Dated: April 26, 2007. 

George T. Skibine, 

Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs. 

[FR Doc. E7-8578 Filed 5-3-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-W7-P
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 87 (Monday, May 7, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 25777]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-8623]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 731-TA-921 (Review)]


Folding Gift Boxes From China

Determination

    On the basis of the record \1\ developed in the subject five-year 
review, the United States International Trade Commission (Commission) 
determines, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 
U.S.C. 1675(c)) (the Act), that revocation of the antidumping duty 
order on folding gift boxes from China would be likely to lead to 
continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the 
United States within a reasonably foreseeable time.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The record is defined in Sec.  207.2(f) of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Background

    The Commission instituted this review on December 1, 2006 (71 FR 
69586) and determined on March 6, 2007 that it would conduct an 
expedited review (72 FR 13512, March 22, 2007).
    The Commission transmitted its determination in this review to the 
Secretary of Commerce on April 30, 2007. The views of the Commission 
are contained in USITC Publication 3917 (April 2007), entitled Folding 
Gift Boxes From China: Investigation No. 731-TA-921 (Review).

    By order of the Commission.

     Issued: May 1, 2007.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E7-8623 Filed 5-4-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

AHMAD DASTJERDI
, Appellant,

v.

SIAVASH AMANISH
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 16

- 2289

[ September 6 , 2017 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; Edward A. Garrison

, Acting Circuit Judge; L.T. Case No.

502003CA01277XXXXMB

.

Alan P. Dagen of The Law Offices of Alan Dagen, P.A., Weston, for appellant.

Aram Caldarera Bloom of Shapiro, Blasi, Wasserman & Hermann, P.A., Boca Raton, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

T

AYLOR

, M AY and C ONNER

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
<SEQUENCE>3
<FILENAME>rcert312-093003.txt            Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, David Robinson, Chief Financial Officer, certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Uptowner
       Inns, Inc.;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this quarterly report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and
other financial information included in this quarterly
report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented
in this quarterly report.

       4.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a)	designed such disclosure controls and procedures
to ensure that material information relating to
the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiary is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period
in which this quarterly report is being
prepared;

b)	evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's
disclosure controls and procedures as of a date
within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c)	presented in this quarterly report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures based on our
evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;







- 1 -
<PAGE>
       5.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the
registrant's board of directors:

a)	all significant deficiencies in the design or
operation of internal controls which could
adversely affect the registrant's ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial
data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal
controls; and

b)	any fraud, whether or not material, that
involves
management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrant's internal
controls; and


6.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I have
indicated
in this quarterly report whether there were significant
changes in internal controls or in other factors that
could significantly affect internal controls subsequent
to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any
corrective actions with regard to significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses.



	/s/ David Robinson
	Chief Financial Officer
	November 12, 2003





















- 2 -
<PAGE>