alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 99.1



     CERTIFICATION BY THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF
               COMPETITIVE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
                 PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
       THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

     I, John B. Nano, am President and Chief Executive
Officer of Competitive Technologies, Inc. (the Company).

     This certification is being furnished pursuant to 18
U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in connection with the filing of
the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarterly period ended January 31, 2003 (the Report).

     I hereby certify that to the best of my knowledge:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of
          Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
          1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly
          presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
          and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and
          for the periods covered by the Report.


  Date: March 17, 2003

                                /s/ John B. Nano
                                John B. Nano
                                President and Chief Executive
                                Officer of Competitive
                                Technologies, Inc.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of US LEC Corp. (the "Company") on Form
10-K for the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Aaron D. Cowell, Jr.,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Aaron D. Cowell, Jr.


Aaron D. Cowell, Jr.
Chief Executive Officer
March 31, 2003
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****VA/DOD clinical practiceguideline for the management of pregnancy [electronic resource].**
PDF--2018|PDF-- clinician's summary |PDF-- patient's summary |PDF-- pocket card | IsYour Body Ready for Pregnancy? |
 
 
SuDoc Number:VA 1.10:P 91/2

Item Number: 0987 (online)

CGP systemNumber:001083162 
October 24, 2018
1

FILED

June 9, 1997

Cecil Crowson, Jr.

Appellate Court Clerk

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

RICHARD C. CANADA and wife ) C/A NO. 03A01-9606-CV-00182

SHARON CANADA, ) BRADLEY COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT

)

Plaintiffs-Appellants, )

)

)

v. )

)

)

ACE CODENT, ZAHN DENTAL COMPANY, )

INC., and HENRY SCHEIN, INC., )

)

Defendants, )

)

)

and )

)

)

ACECODENT INCORPORATED, )

) HONORABLE EARLE G. MURPHY,

Defendant-Appellee. ) JUDGE

OPINION AND ORDER

On September 23, 1996, we filed our opinion in this

case. The Supreme Court granted the appellants’ application for

permission to appeal and remanded this matter to us by order

entered May 5, 1997. We were directed by that court to

reconsider this case in light of the Supreme Court’s opinion in

Cobb v. Beier, S/C No. 03S01-9610-CV-00106 (Supreme Court at

Knoxville, April 28, 1997).

In view of the Supreme Court’s decision in Cobb, we

find and hold that the motion of Acecodent Incorporated to

dismiss this appeal because of the failure of the appellants to

serve a copy of the notice of appeal on the clerk of this court

is not well taken and it is accordingly DENIED. To the extent

our earlier opinion, and the judgment filed pursuant to it, find

and hold otherwise, they are, to that extent, vacated and held

for naught. 
2

We adhere to the remainder of our earlier opinion,

which held that the one issue raised by the appellants on this

appeal is not well taken. It results that the judgment of the

trial court is in all things affirmed. Costs on appeal are again

taxed to the appellants.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

ENTER:

__________________________

Charles D. Susano, Jr., J.

__________________________

Houston M. Goddard, J.

__________________________

Don T. McMurray, J.
(Reap. Dec. 8848)

#### Geo. S. Bush & Co., Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 4253.

(Decided June 20, 1957)

*Brooks & Brooks*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Chief Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement relates to certain bicycles imported from Germany and entered at the port of Seattle, Wash.

The case is before me on an agreed set of facts which establish that cost of production is the proper basis for appraisement of the bicycles in question, and that such statutory value for the invoice items marked “A” is $17.55 each, less inland freight, and for the invoice items marked “B” is $18.25 each, less inland freight, and I so hold.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
**EXHIBIT 23.1**
**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements:
(1)  Registration Statement on Form S-8 pertaining to the 1996 Equity Incentive Plan, the1998-A Direct Hit Stock Plan and the 1999 Non-Officer Equity Incentive Plan (No.333-33694),
(2)  Registration Statement on Form S-8 pertaining to the 1999 Equity Incentive Plan, andthe 1999 Employee Stock Purchasing Plan (No. 333-88435),
(3)  Registration Statement on Form S-8 pertaining to the 1999 Equity Incentive Plan, asAmended through May 25, 2000 and the 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, as Amended throughMay 25, 2000 (No. 333-97405),
(4)  Registration Statement on Form S-8 pertaining to the Net Effect Systems, Inc. 1997Stock Plan (No. 333-95687),
(5)  Registration Statement on Form S-8 pertaining to the 1999 Equity Incentive Plan, asamended through May 25, 2000, the 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, as amended throughMay 25, 2000, and the 1999 Non-Qualified Incentive Plan, as amended through January 1,2001 (No. 333-73400),
(6)  Registration Statement on Form S-8 pertaining to the 1999 Equity Incentive Plan, asamended, and the 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, as amended (Nos. 333-105271 and333-116145),
(7)  Registration Statement on Form S-8 pertaining to the Interactive Search Holdings,Inc. 2001 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended, and 2003 Equity Incentive Plan (No.333-116143),
(8)  Registration Statement on Form S-3 pertaining to resale of the Zero CouponConvertible Subordinated Notes (No. 333-108932)
(9)  Registration Statement on Form S-3 pertaining to the offering of up to $400 millionin primary securities on a delayed or continuous basis (No. 333-116256),
of our report dated March 10, 2005, with respect to the consolidated financial statements andfinancial statement schedule of Ask Jeeves, Inc., our report dated March 10, 2005, with respect toAsk Jeeves, Inc. management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financialreporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Ask Jeeves, Inc.included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Ask Jeeves, Inc.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
San Francisco, California
### Surface water supply of the United States, 1961-65, Part 4. St. Lawrence River basin, Volume 2. St. Lawrence River basin below Lake Huron

By: Water Resources Division, U.S. Geological Survey

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1912

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

No abstract available.

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

                                            
<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          67,956
<SECURITIES>                                    17,061
<RECEIVABLES>                                   29,598
<ALLOWANCES>                                       489
<INVENTORY>                                     17,734
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               145,514
<PP&E>                                         151,671
<DEPRECIATION>                                  68,020
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 242,887
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           45,147
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           313
<OTHER-SE>                                     193,273
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   242,887
<SALES>                                        222,041
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               222,041
<CGS>                                          105,134
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  105,134
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               105,134
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   179
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 178
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 58,078
<INCOME-TAX>                                    21,172
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             36,906
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    36,906
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.13
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           1,907
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,473,954
<ALLOWANCES>                                   253,891
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,255,977
<PP&E>                                       1,799,283
<DEPRECIATION>                                 369,849
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,429,434
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       17,779,011
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    13,536,661
<OTHER-SE>                                        (45)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                14,357,959
<SALES>                                      2,351,313
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,351,313
<CGS>                                          715,433
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                8,842,386
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (57,464)<F1>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           6,478,735
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (13,627,777)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (13,627,777)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (13,627,777)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (1.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.05)
<FN>
1  Represents other income from rents and subleases.
</FN>



</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          24,280
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  243,429
<ALLOWANCES>                                     9,729
<INVENTORY>                                    130,312
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               422,564
<PP&E>                                         557,531
<DEPRECIATION>                                (229,826)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,040,605
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          173,525
<BONDS>                                        122,357
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           935
<OTHER-SE>                                     698,532
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,040,605
<SALES>                                        110,065
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               205,821
<CGS>                                           73,826
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  151,079
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,084
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   807
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,411
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (10,948)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,645
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (12,593)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (12,593)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.14)


</TABLE>
My	name	is	Jacob	Southard,	and	I	would	like	an	FAA	petition	for	exemption	to	be	

able	to	professionally	fly	my	DJI	Inspire	One	quadcopter.

I	am	a	freelance	videographer/cinematographer	and	would	like	to	LEGALLY	be	able	

to	fly	my	quadcopter for	professional	aerial	video	and	pictures.

I	graduated	from	Missouri	Western	State	University	in	2014	with	a	Bachelor’s	

degree	in	Cinema.

My	website:	www.jakesouthardcinema.com

I	have	heard	of	other	professionals	applying	for	an	FAA	exemption	under	section	

333	that	grants	permissions	to	be	able	to	fly	anywhere	(besides	airports	and	

restricted	areas),	while	keeping	line	of	site,	and	under	200	feet	altitude.	

My	cell	phone	number	is	8163907590

And	can	also	be	reached	at	Jakesouthardcinemallc@gmail.com
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R.

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 95-31174

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

KELVIN D. MCMANUS,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Louisiana

USDC No. CR-95-60-B

- - - - - - - - - -

July 14, 1997

Before JONES, DeMOSS and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Kelvin D. McManus appeals from his conviction and sentence

for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute and to

distribute cocaine base, possession with intent to distribute

cocaine base, and using and carrying a firearm in relation to a

drug-trafficking crime. He argues that the factual basis was

inadequate to support his guilty-plea conviction for using and

carrying a firearm in relation to a drug-trafficking crime in
No. 95-31174

- 2 -

light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Bailey v. United States,

116 S. Ct. 501 (1995), and that the district court erred by

finding that he was not entitled to a reduction in his offense

level pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2 for being a minor participant. 

Because McManus displayed the weapon to the CI while they were

driving to the drug transaction, the factual basis was adequate

to support McManus’s conviction for using a firearm during and in

relation to a drug-trafficking offense. See United States v.

Hall, 110 F.3d 1155, 1160-61 (5th Cir. 1997) (gun must be

disclosed or mentioned by the offender to be actively employed). 

Further, given the testimony by Agent Rollins at the sentencing

hearing and the information contained in the PSR, the district

court did not clearly err by refusing to grant McManus a twolevel reduction for his minor role in the offense pursuant to 

§ 3B1.2. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.
**Exhibit 13.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C § 1350, as created by Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Open Joint StockCompany Long-Distance and International Telecommunications Rostelecom (the “Company”)hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

(i)    theaccompanying annual report on Form 20-F of the Company for the yearended December 31, 2005 (the “Report”) fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable,of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii)   the information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.
| Date: June 30, 2006 |                                 |
|--------------------------|--------------------------------------|
|                     | /s/ Dmitry Ye. Yerokhin              |   |
|                     | Dmitry Ye. Yerokhin                  |
|                     | General Director (CEO)               |
|                     | OJSC Long-Distance and International |
|                     | Telecommunications Rostelecom        |

 

----
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report
of Universal Life Holding Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the
period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Frederic S. Richardson , Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of
my knowledge:

(1)       
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)       
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Date: November 15, 2004

/s/ Frederic S. RichardsonFrederic
S. RichardsonChief Executive Officer &Chief Finanical Officer
(Reap. Dec. 9419)

#### New York Merchandise Co., Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 22671.

(Decided May 12, 1959)

*Stein <£ Shostak (Marjorie M. Shostak*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*George Goohran DovT>,*Assistant Attorney General *(Murray Sklaroff,*trial attorney), for the defendant.

Wilson, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement relates to certain willow baskets exported from Holland and entered at the port of Los Angeles. The merchandise was appraised at the invoice unit value, less 25 per centum to cover certain nondutiable charges. The parties herein have agreed and stipulated that appraisement of the merchandise should have been based on the invoice unit value per set, less the actual nondutiable charges, viz, inland freight charges in the amount of $180 and charges for ocean freight, amounting to $534.

On the agreed facts, I find that the proper value of the involved merchandise for appraisement purposes is the invoice unit value of $5.35 per set, less the sums of $180 for inland freight charges and $534, representing charges for ocean freight.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
No. 56160.

protest 48439-K (Boston).

#### T. C. Carlin Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protest.
# Official Journal C 336/9 Oc

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 336 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 639 October 2020 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 336

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 639 October 2020

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2020/C 336/01 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2020/C 336/01

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  )

1

1

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN