alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Amended Annual Report of Apollo Acquisition Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the period ended June 30, 2016 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jianguo Xu, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of December 1, 2016.  /s/ Jianguo XuJianguo XuChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)  A signed original of this written statement, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement, has been provided to Apollo Acquisition Corporation, and will be retained by Apollo Acquisition Corporation, and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.2   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002    In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Report of Competitive Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Johnnie D. Johnson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   /s/ Johnnie D. Johnson Johnnie D. Johnson Chief Financial Officer  August 17, 2011  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Competitive Technologies and will be retained by Competitive Technologies and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
The Honor able Da vid L . Bunning , United States District J udg e for the Easter n District of * Kentucky , sitti ngby

desig nation. NO T REC OM M EN DE D F OR F UL L- TEX T P UB LIC AT ION F ile Nam e: 06a0805n.06 F iled: Novem ber 1, 2006 No. 06-5146 UN ITED STA TES C OU RT OF AP P EA LS F OR THE SI XT H C IR CU IT
CHESTER KI DD Pla int if f- Ap pe lla nt,
v. AI RBORNE EXPRES S, I NC., a/k/a Airbor

ne Fr eig ht Corpor ation; D HL EXPRESS (USA), I NC., a/k/a DHL

Worldwide Ex press, Inc. De fe nd ants -A

pp e lle e s. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ON APPEALFROM THE U NI TED STATES DI STRI CT COURT FOR THE MI DDL E DI STRI CT OF TEN NESSEE

Be fore : MARTI

N and COOK , Circuit J udg es; and B UNNI NG, District Judge. *
PER C URI AM. Chester Kidd appea ls the district court’s orde r g rantingsummary judgme nt fo r A ir bo rn e Expr e ss. Ha

vin gre vie we d th e re c or d a nd the a pp lic a ble law, and

havin gthe be ne fi t of ora l argument and the pa rties’ bri ef

s , we d et ermine that no jurisprudential purpose w ould be
serve d by a panel opinion a

nd aff irm the district c ourt’s dec ision for the re asons stated in that cour t’s op ini on . We wi ll n ot c on sid e r K idd ’s argume nt, ra ise d fo r th e fi rst tim e on a pp e a l, t hat th e te st
announce d in Christ ian v. W al-Mart Stores, Inc. , 252 F.3d 862 ( 6th Cir. 2001), g overns his ca se.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 23 - 0356

______________________________________________________________________________ DONALD AARON HESSER, JR.,

Petitioner and Appellant vs. STATE OF MONTANA,

Respondent and Appellee.

______________________________________________________________________________

**Order Extending Deadline to File Reply Brief** 

______________________________________________________________________________ Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time to file Appellant’s reply brief and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is given an extension of time until March 1 , 2024 to file and serve the reply brief. 

### No further extensi ons will be granted.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

February 1 2024

02/01/2024
Case Number: DA 23-0356
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JU LY 13, 2016

NO. 03

- 12

- 00631

- CV

Carolyn Barnes, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 368TH DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUST ICES PEMBERTON AND B OURLAND

DISMISSED AS MOOT

-- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE

This is an appeal from the order signed by t he district court on August 28, 2012. Having

reviewed the record

, and the arguments of counsel, the Court agrees that the appeal is moot and

t herefore dismisses the appeal

. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no

adjudication of costs i s made.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Darrell TURNER, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 04-2378.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Sept. 20, 2005.

William T. Grimmer, Office of the United States Attorney, South Bend, IN, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Mark S. Lenyo, South Bend, IN, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before POSNER, WOOD, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

We ordered a limited remand to ask whether the district judge, had he known the sentencing guidelines were advisory, would have imposed the same sentence on Darrell Turner. *See United States v. Booker,*— U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005); *United States v. Paladino,*401 F.3d 471, 484 (7th Cir.2005). The judge answered that he would.

We invited the parties to respond, but only the government did. Here, the sentencing range was properly calculated under the guidelines and thus presumptively reasonable. *See United States v. Mykytiuk,*415 F.3d 606, 608 (7th Cir.2005). Because Turner has not rebutted that presumption, the judgment in appeal number 04-2378 is AFFIRMED.
Before the Second Division,

January 12, 1939

No. 40406.

#### Protests 620278-G, etc., of Butler Bros. (New York).

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of Abstract 38680 the hair curlers in question were held dutiable at 40 percent under paragraph 339 as claimed.
#### Allan HOCHMAN; Judith Hochman, Plaintiffs, The Secret L.P., a California limited partnership; the Secret, Inc.; Sandy Lang; Peter Albertsson, Creditors, and Shaub Williams & Nunziato, Appellant, v. PRUDENTIAL PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant, and Alan M. Kindred, Appellee. Allan Hochman; Judith Hochman, Plaintiffs, *822The Secret L.P., a California limited partnership; the Secret, Inc.; Sandy Lang; Peter Albertsson, Creditors, and Alan M. Kindred, Appellant, v. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance Company, Defendant, and Shaub Williams & Nunziato, Appellee.

No. 04-55149, 04-56177.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 12, 2005.*

Decided Sept. 14, 2005.

David R. Shaub, Esq., Shaub *&*Williams, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiffs.

David B. Casselman, Esq., Wasserman, Comden & Casselman, Tarzana, CA, for Creditors.

Alan M. Kindred, Buchalter Neimer Fields & Younger, Los Angeles, CA, for Appellee.

Before: GRABER and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges, and FOGEL,** District Judge.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

**

 The Honorable Jeremy D. Fogel, United States District Judge for the Northern District of California, sitting by designation.

MEMORANDUM ***

For the reasons given by the district court in its orders of November 20, 2001, and December 19, 2004, the decision of the district court is AFFIRMED.

***

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 273 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 273

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas, in 1957, a group of visionary leaders gathered at the famed Brown Derby 
        in Los Angeles to form The National Academy of Recording Arts & 
        Sciences;
Whereas The Recording Academy soon created the GRAMMY Award which is the world's 
        most visible and prestigious award for music;
Whereas the GRAMMY was created as a peer award, given by music makers, for music 
        makers, to honor the highest quality recording music of the year without 
        regard to sales or chart position;
Whereas The Recording Academy expanded its mission beyond recognition of musical 
        excellence to include groundbreaking professional development, cultural 
        enrichment, advocacy, education, and human services programs;
Whereas through its 12 chapters across America, The Recording Academy serves 
        more than 18,000 musicians, singers, songwriters, producers, engineers, 
        and other music professionals;
Whereas, in 1989, The Recording Academy created the GRAMMY Foundation to 
        cultivate the understanding, appreciation, and advancement of the 
        contribution of recorded music to American culture, from the artistic 
        and technical legends of the past to the still unimagined musical 
        breakthroughs of future generations of music professionals;
Whereas that same year, The Recording Academy created MusiCares, to provide a 
        safety net of critical assistance for music people in times of need;
Whereas the GRAMMYs on the Hill Initiative, based in Washington, DC, works to 
        advance the rights of the music community through advocacy, education, 
        and dialogue; and
Whereas through this initiative, The Recording Academy has become a leading 
        advocate for music makers: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That Congress congratulates The Recording Academy during its 50th 
GRAMMY celebration for its important work in improving the environment 
for music and music makers.

            Passed the House of Representatives February 6, 2008.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
110th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                            H. CON. RES. 273

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 Recognizing the 50th Anniversary of the National Academy of Recording 
                            Arts & Sciences.
```
No. 41999.

#### Protest 167303-G of Kalil Akkoul (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

From the record it was found that certain items consist of laces similar to those involved in *Amrein*v. *United States*(T. D. 49551). The claim at 75 percent under paragraph 1430 was therefore sustained.
**Poster Abstract Submittal for the**  **35 th**  **Annual Martz Summer Conference: June 5**  **– 6**  **Boulder,**

**Colorado**

**Title: The**  **Hydraulic Fracturing (HF)**  **Process : Real Concern or Misdirected Focus**  **Concerning Threats to Drinking Water Supplies (DWS)**  Massive development of several shale gas reservoirs including the Marcellus shale has established significant new unconventional resource reserve s through multi
- stage h ydraulic fracturing coupled with horizontal drilling. This poster illustrates that the real concern for impacts to potable aquifers (DWS) of a more widespread and long term nature will likely be from subsurface stray gas (methane) migration
. Subsurface stray

gas is largely

sourced from either 1) non - targeted gas bearing zones (show intervals) that were missed and left un
- isolated b y the cementing of open annular intervals or from some failure of a barrier (casing or cement) in the well construction that leads to annular overpressuring
. Managing risk through detecting the occurrence of and preventing methane releases to groundwater and /or the atmosphere from stray gas migration should be the focus rather than subsurface migration of hydraulic fracturing fluids . Onl y limited pathway s (primarily inter
- wellbore communication in frack hits) and little (if any) documentation exists for frack fluid subsurface migration to potable groundwater supplies after 1.2 million fracks (frac jobs)
. Methane is buoyant and far more abundant , concentrated and mobile in response to pressure gradients than the frack fluids introduced into the subsurface during the hydraulic fracturing “process” . While non
- toxic, it does pose an explosion hazard when elevated in water supplies from either natural sources or resource development activities
. Itis also a potent greenhouse gas when vented to the atmosphere in efforts to manage stray gas . Nearl y all states and the BLM , permit well designs with substantial intermediate depth intervals of open , unce mented annuli outside casing strings (New York in recentl y proposed regulation of High Volume Hydraulic Fracturing and recent regulatory changes b y West Virginia and Arkansas are exceptions )
. This leaves potentiall y open a several thousand foot cross
- strata migration path to the surface casing seat for stray methane. Under deeply fractured bedrock conditions that may extend below required surface (or intermediate) casing depths, a migration pathway to potable freshwater aquifers from a borehole over pressure d (above h ydrostatic) by gas could circumvent cemented surface casings of good integrity via this natural fracture s ys tem
. This poster visually presents this migration mechanism and illustrates this risk for discussion purposes , so that its impact and frequency of occurrence under various geological conditions might be considered in the context of the expanding unconventional resource play s .
(Reap. Dec. 9415)

#### Uniworld Industrial Mart, Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 822016.

(Decided May 5, 1959)

Plaintiff not represented by counsel.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Lawrence, Judge:

When the above-enumerated appeal for a re-praisement was called for hearing, there was no appearance on behalf of plaintiff. The court thereupon ordered the case submitted.

Eule 5(a) of the rules of the court provides that—

> The submission for decision of any case shall be made in open court by the parties thereto or their attorneys, or by stipulation, or by written request to the court, or by the court on its own motion. Where the plaintiff, petitioner, or appellant, or his attorney, in a case does not appear when the same is called, and after the opposite party has had opportunity to present evidence on the issues, it may be deemed submitted and may be decided by the court on the record as it appears therein.

Accordingly, I have examined the record in the appeal before the court and find nothing therein which tends in any way to overcome the presumption of correctness which attaches to the decision of the appraiser. I find and hold, therefore, that the proper value of the merchandise is the value returned by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Wage Differences and Establishment Practices: 17 Labor Markets, 1953-54

              																	United States. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 						*Wage Differences and Establishment Practices: 17 Labor Markets, 1953-54 : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 1173*,												Washington: 								U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 										1955,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/4477,			accessed on September 20, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>              <C>                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS            6-MOS               YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>           DEC-31-1999       DEC-31-1999        DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                SEP-30-2000       SEP-30-2000        DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                               0             1,891             30,204
<SECURITIES>                         0                 0                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                        0                 0                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                         0                 0             41,201
<INVENTORY>                          0                 0                  0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                     0        39,504,466          4,009,014
<PP&E>                               0                 0                  0
<DEPRECIATION>                       0                 0                  0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                       0         3,952,357          4,080,419
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                0         1,339,272          1,403,923
<BONDS>                              0                 0                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                0                 0                  0
<PREFERRED>                          0                 0                  0
<COMMON>                             0                 0                  0
<OTHER-SE>                           0                 0          4,080,419
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>         0         3,952,357                  0
<SALES>                              0                 0                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                    23               798                  0
<CGS>                                0                 0                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                        0                 0                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                26,762            95,017                  0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                     0                 0                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                   0                 0                  0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                (26,739)          (94,219)                 0
<INCOME-TAX>                         0                 0                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             22,500            30,808                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                       0                 0                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                      0                 0                  0
<CHANGES>                            0                 0                  0
<NET-INCOME>                    (4,239)          (63,411)                 0
<EPS-BASIC>                        0                 0                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                        0                 0                  0


</TABLE>
No. 50683.

#### Protest 110062-K of Czarnikow-Rionda Co. (Tampa).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

At the trial the importer abandoned the claim so far as it involved the shortage of 10 bags of sugar. The Government conceded that 100 bags of sugar were short landed in the United States. In view of the record, judgment was entered in favor of the plaintiff directing the collector to reliquidate the entry and make refund of all duties taken upon 100 bags of sugar reported short.
Approved
                                      by the Annual General Shareholders Meeting
                                             of OJSC Rostelecom on June 15, 2003
                                               Minutes No. 1 dated June 20, 2003

                                              __________________________________

                                    Chairman of the General Shareholders Meeting


                                   Amendments
                               to the Regulations
                          on the Board of Directors of
                    OJSC Rostelecom (restated version No. 2)
               approved by the Annual General Shareholders Meeting
     of OJSC Rostelecom on June 1, 2002 (Minutes No. 1, dated June 10, 2002)

1. Restate Clause 7.1 as follows:  "For the period of performance by the members
of the Board of Directors of their duties, the Company shall remunerate them and
compensate  costs  connected  with the  performance  by  members of the Board of
Directors of their functions."
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>          5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          (8,321)
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   49,853
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                72,167
<PP&E>                                          85,034
<DEPRECIATION>                                  85,034
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  72,167
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           44,767
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    72,167
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               329,852
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   614
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,160
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             19,748
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>