alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2016136EN.01003301.xml

| 18.4.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 136/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.4.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 136/33

---

Judgment of the General Court of 1 March 2016 — 1&1 Internet v OHIM — Unoe Bank (1e1)

(Case T-61/15) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community word mark 1e1 - Earlier national word mark UNO E and earlier figurative mark unoe - Relative grounds for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2016/C 136/47)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: 1&1 Internet AG (Montabaur, Germany) (represented by: G. Klopp, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: L. Rampini, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the General Court: Unoe Bank, SA (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: N. González-Alberto Rodríguez, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 4 December 2014 (Case R 101/2014-5) relating to opposition proceedings between Unoe Bank, SA and 1&1 Internet AG.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 4 December 2014 (Case R 101/2014-5) relating to opposition proceedings between Unoe Bank, SA and 1&1 Internet AG; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 4 December 2014 (Case R 101/2014-5) relating to opposition proceedings between Unoe Bank, SA and 1&1 Internet AG;

| 2. | Orders OHIM to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by 1&1 Internet AG; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders OHIM to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by 1&1 Internet AG;

| 3. | Orders Unoe Bank, SA to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Unoe Bank, SA to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 107, 30.3.2015.

1

---
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 356 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 356

  Expressing the sense of the Congress that a postage stamp should be 
issued to honor law enforcement officers killed in the line of duty and 
  that the Citizens' Stamp Advisory Committee should recommend to the 
            Postmaster General that such a stamp be issued.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 20, 2008

     Mr. Filner (for himself and Mr. Issa) submitted the following 
concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight 
                         and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
  Expressing the sense of the Congress that a postage stamp should be 
issued to honor law enforcement officers killed in the line of duty and 
  that the Citizens' Stamp Advisory Committee should recommend to the 
            Postmaster General that such a stamp be issued.

Whereas more than 17,900 law enforcement officers have lost their lives in the 
        line of duty in American communities since 1792, when records first 
        started to be kept;
Whereas 186 law enforcement officers lost their lives in the line of duty in 
        American communities in 2007;
Whereas 870,000 law enforcement officers risk danger to their lives and safety 
        each day to serve and protect American communities;
Whereas America's law enforcement officers set an example of strength, courage, 
        and valor that all Americans can admire and learn from;
Whereas following September 11, 2001, on which day 72 law enforcement officers 
        were killed while responding to attacks perpetrated against this Nation, 
        law enforcement has taken on the additional responsibility of protecting 
        our homeland and the American people from the threat of terrorism; and
Whereas issuing a postage stamp to honor the sacrifices of America's law 
        enforcement officers is proper and fitting: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of the Congress that--
            (1) a postage stamp should be issued to honor law 
        enforcement officers killed in the line of duty; and
            (2) the Citizens' Stamp Advisory Committee should recommend 
        to the Postmaster General that such a stamp be issued.
                                 <all>
```
No. 53783.

protests 128741-K/1032, etc. (Chicago).

#### American Express Co. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Cole, J.

The protests were dismissed.
Case No. 8,624.

#### LYLES v. ALEXANDRIA.

[1 Cranch, C. C. 361.] 1

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

Nov. Term, 1806.

Bill of Exceptions — Refusal of Judge to Sign

The court will not sign a bill of exceptions, which states that it contains all the evidence in the cause, unless, Ac.

THE COURT

(DUCKETT, Circuit Judge, absent,)

refused to sign a bill of exceptions stating that it contained all the evidence offered in the cause; that fact not appearing to be agreed by the parties, and the court not being satisfied that the whole evidence was stated.
# C_2022095EN.01002102.xml

| 28.2.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 95/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.2.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 95/21

---

Judgment of the General Court of 21 December 2021 — Gmina Miasto Gdynia and Port Lotniczy Gdynia Kosakowo v Commission

(Case T-263/15 RENV) (1)

(State aid - Airport infrastructure - Public funding by the municipalities of Gdynia and Kosakowo for setting up the Gdynia-Kosakowo Airport - Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery - Advantage - Market economy operator principle - Effect on trade between Member States - Adverse effect on competition - Recovery - Withdrawal of a decision - Failure to re-open the formal investigation procedure - Procedural rights of the interested parties - Rights of the defence - Obligation to state reasons)

(2022/C 95/27)

Language of the case: Polish

Parties

Applicants: Gmina Miasto Gdynia (Poland), Port Lotniczy Gdynia Kosakowo sp. z o.o. (Gdynia, Poland) (represented by: T. Koncewicz, M. Le Berre, K. Gruszecka-Spychała and P. Rosiak, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: K. Herrmann, D. Recchia and S. Noë, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the applicants: Republic of Poland (represented by: B. Majczyna, M. Rzotkiewicz and S. Żyrek, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action brought under Article 263 TFEU and seeking the annulment of Articles 2 to 5 Commission Decision (EU) 2015/1586 of 26 February 2015 on measure SA.35388 (13/C) (ex 13/NN and ex 12/N) — Poland — Setting up the Gdynia-Kosakowo Airport (OJ 2015 L 250, p. 165).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Gmina Miasto Gdynia and Port Lotniczy Gdynia Kosakowo sp. z o.o. to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission before the Court of Justice in Case C-56/18 P and before the General Court in Cases T-263/15 and T-263 RENV; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Gmina Miasto Gdynia and Port Lotniczy Gdynia Kosakowo sp. z o.o. to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission before the Court of Justice in Case C-56/18 P and before the General Court in Cases T-263/15 and T-263 RENV;

| 3. | Orders the Republic of Poland to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Republic of Poland to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 254, 3.8.2015.

---
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Average Retail Prices: Collection and Calculation Techniques and Problems, Presenting Average Retail Prices for Selected Commodities and Services (Other Than Food, Fuel, and Rent) Included in the Consumer Price Index, 1953 and 1954

              																	Hoover, Ethel Dallmeyer					 and 	United States. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 						*Average Retail Prices: Collection and Calculation Techniques and Problems, Presenting Average Retail Prices for Selected Commodities and Services (Other Than Food, Fuel, and Rent) Included in the Consumer Price Index, 1953 and 1954 : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 1182*,												Washington: 								U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 										June 1955,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/4481,			accessed on September 25, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>              1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              AUG-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   NOV-30-1998
<CASH>                                                 938
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       11,485
<ALLOWANCES>                                          (964)
<INVENTORY>                                          1,303
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    21,387
<PP&E>                                              92,472
<DEPRECIATION>                                     (36,547)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     101,937
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               17,214
<BONDS>                                             20,039
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             4,993
<OTHER-SE>                                          28,681
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       101,937
<SALES>                                             15,270
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    15,270
<CGS>                                                8,930
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       15,224
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     6,294
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     751
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     (1,086)
<INCOME-TAX>                                          (449)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   (637)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                          (637)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        (0.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (0.13)
        


</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Guillermo LANGARICA-RIVERA, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 04-50306.

D.C. No. CR-03-01362-JSR.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 12, 2005.*

Decided Sept. 15, 2005.

Michelle Jennings, USSD—Office of the U.S. Attorney, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Ezekiel E. Cortez, San Diego, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before REINHARDT, RYMER, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.

*

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM**

Guillermo Langarica-Rivera appeals from a 71-month sentence imposed follow*845ing his guilty plea to attempted entry after deportation, 8 U.S.C. § 1326.

Langarica-Rivera contends that the district court violated his constitutional rights in making an upward adjustment under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(l)(A)(ii) for a crime of violence. This contention is foreclosed by this court’s case law. *See United States v. Moreno-Hernandez,*419 F.3d 906, 914-15 n. 8 (9th Cir.2005) (explaining that a district judge’s enhancement of a sentence, based on the fact of a prior conviction under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2, does not raise any Sixth Amendment problems).

Because Langarica-Rivera was sentenced under the then-mandatory Sentencing Guidelines, and we cannot reliably determine from the record whether the sentence imposed would have been materially different had the district court known that the Guidelines were advisory, we remand to the sentencing court to answer that question, and to proceed pursuant to *United States v. Ameline,*409 F.3d 1073, 1084 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc). *See Moreno-Hernandez,*at 915-16 (extending *Ameline’s*limited remand procedure to cases involving non-constitutional *Booker*error).

REMANDED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
No. 39093.

#### Protest 939465-G of Burleigh Brooks (New York).

Opinion by

McClelland, P. J.

There was nothing in the record to sustain the claim made. The protest was therefore overruled.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 89 (Wednesday, May 9, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26442-26443]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-8831]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration <greek-i> 10855 and <greek-i> 10856]


New Jersey Disaster Number NJ-00006

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Amendment 2.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a 
major disaster for the State of New Jersey (FEMA-1694-DR), dated 04/26/
2007.
    Incident: Severe Storms and Inland and Coastal Flooding.
    Incident Period: 04/14/2007 through 04/20/2007.
    Effective Date: 04/30/2007.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 06/25/2007.
    Eidl Loan Application Deadline Date: 01/28/2008.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of the Presidential disaster 
declaration for the State of New Jersey, dated 04/26/2007 is hereby 
amended to include the following areas as adversely affected by the 
disaster:

Primary Counties:
    Camden, Gloucester, Mercer.
Contiguous Counties:
    New Jersey, Cumberland, Salem, Delaware, New Castle, Pennsylvania 
and Delaware.

    All other information in the original declaration remains 
unchanged.


[[Page 26443]]


(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

Herbert L. Mitchell,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. E7-8831 Filed 5-8-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 297 

Recognizing the 60th anniversary of the integration of the United States 

Armed Forces. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 14, 2008 

Mr. ROGERS of Alabama (for himself, Mr. MEEK of Florida, Mr. TOWNS, Ms. 

BORDALLO, Mr. ADERHOLT, Mr. MARIO DIAZ-BALART of Florida, Mr. 

BISHOP of Georgia, Mr. MCGOVERN, Mr. GALLEGLY, Mr. UDALL of Colorado, Mr. SNYDER, Mr. BACHUS, Mr. BONNER, Mr. HASTINGS of Florida, Mr. FOSSELLA, Mr. CARTER, Mr. RANGEL, Mr. FARR, Mr. VAN

HOLLEN, Mr. FILNER, Ms. SUTTON, Mr. DAVIS of Alabama, Mr. EVERETT, Ms. WASSERMAN SCHULTZ, Mrs. MYRICK, and Mr. CRAMER) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Armed Services 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the 60th anniversary of the integration of the 

United States Armed Forces. 

Whereas the United States has always had strong armed 

forces made up of courageous men and women serving 

the ideals of duty, honor, and country; 

Whereas the United States Armed Forces was unfortunately 

once a place of segregation of the races; 

Whereas despite segregation, minority members of the United 

States Armed Forces, such as the Tuskegee Airmen, who 

trained at historic Moton Field in Macon County, AlaVerDate Aug 31 2005 00:51 Feb 15, 2008 Jkt 069200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6300 E:\BILLS\HC297.IH HC297

smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
2 

•HCON 297 IH 

bama, demonstrated honor and bravery above and beyond 

the call of duty; 

Whereas the bravery and sacrifice of all members of the 

United States Armed Forces regardless of race during 

World War II and prior conflicts is a matter of National 

honor; 

Whereas the integration of the United States Armed Forces 

in 1948 was a seminal event in our Nation’s history and 

instilled the democratic ideal of equality in the military; 

and 

Whereas the continued bravery and dedication of every member of the United States Armed Forces continues to be 

a source of pride to every American: Now, therefore, be 

it 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That it is the sense of Congress to honorably 

3 and respectfully recognize the historic significance and to 

4 celebrate the 60th Anniversary of President Truman’s Ex5 ecutive Order 9981 signed on July 26, 1948 that declared 

6 it to be the policy of the President that there shall be 

7 equality of treatment and opportunity for all persons in 

8 the armed services without regard to race, color, religion 

9 or national origin thereby beginning the process of ending 

10 segregation in the United States Armed Forces. 

Æ 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
### Ground-water geology and hydrology of Bunker Hill Air Force Base and vicinity, Peru, Indiana

By: Frank A. WatkinsJoseph S. Rosenshein

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1619B

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
No. 43125.

#### Protest 843423-G of Schear & Schrader (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of Abstract 39948 the sirens in question were held dutiable at 45 percent under paragraph 397 as claimed.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 80 (Thursday, April 26, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 20842]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-7987]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP07-167-002]


Petal Gas Storage, L.L.C.; Notice of Compliance Filing

April 20, 2007.
    Take notice that on April 17, 2007, Petal Gas Storage, L.L.C. 
(Petal) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Original 
Volume No. 1, Second Substitute Second Revised Sheet No. 140, to become 
effective March 6, 2007.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing must file in accordance 
with Rule 211 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 
CFR 385.211). Protests to this filing will be considered by the 
Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will 
not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Such protests 
must be filed in accordance with the provisions of Section 154.210 of 
the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 154.210). Anyone filing a protest 
must serve a copy of that document on all the parties to the 
proceeding.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests in lieu 
of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons 
unable to file electronically should submit an original and 14 copies 
of the protest to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First 
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#591f1c0b1a16373530373c0a2c2929362b2d193f3c2b3a773e362f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3b7d7e697874555752555e684e4b4b54494f7b5d5e4958155c544d">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-7987 Filed 4-25-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
No. 46383.

#### Protests 911124-G, etc., of Julius Niclas & Co. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Olivee, P. J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of atomizers ard atomizers contained in toilet sets and that said atomizers are similar in all material respects to those passed upon *in*Abstract 44140. In accordance therewith the claim at 60 percent under paragraph 218 (f) was therefore sustained.