alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case No. 9,946.

#### In re MURPHY.

[10 N. B. R. (1874) 48.] 1

District Court, M. D. Tennessee.

Bankruptcy — Insanity—Reopening the Adjudication.

Creditor of B. files n petition against him asking his adjudication in voluntary bankruptcy. The order to show cause was served on him, and on his default to answer he was adjudged a bankrupt, and after the appointment of an assignee, the property of B. tvas turned over to him, but no distribution among the creditors was ever made. Sometime thereafter, B. comes into court with a petition, supported by affidavits. showing that he was non compos mentis at the time the debts of the petitioning creditors were created, as well as at the time of the institution of proceedings and the adjudication, and until a very recent period. *Held*that under the above state of facts, the application to set aside the default and subsequent adjudication should be granted, and B. now allowed to show ; cause why he should not be adjudged a bank- ¡ rupt. 1

[Doubted in Re Weitzel, Case No. 17,305.]

NOTE. A jury trial was subsequently had, and a verdict of insanity at the time of the adjudication rendered: whereupon the court ordered the assignee to restore the property to Murphy. [Case unreported.]

In bankruptcy.

1

 [Reprinted by permission.]

TRIGG, District Judge.

Creditors of Alonzo Murphy filed a petition against him, asking his adjudication in involuntary bankruptcy, some time in the year 1872. The order to show cause was served on him. and on his default to answer he was adjudicated a bankrupt, and his property turned over to an assignee. The property in the hands of the assignee has never been distributed among the creditors. Alonzo Murphy now comes in with a petition supported by affidavits, showing that he was non compos mentis at the time the debts of petitioning creditors were created, as well as at the time of the institution of proceedings, and the adjudication of bankruptcy, and until a very recent period. Under this state of facts, I cannot refuse the application to set the default and subsequent adjudication aside, and to allow Alonzo Murphy to show cause why he should not be adjudicated a bankrupt.
# C_2015245EN.01002801.xml

| 27.7.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 245/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.7.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 245/28

---

Order of the President of the General Court of 2 June 2015 — Buga v Parliament and Others

(Case T-241/15 R)

((Application - Directive on the prevention of the use of the financial system for the purpose of money laundering and terrorist financing - Application for interim measures - Manifest inadmissibility of the main action - Inadmissibility))

(2015/C 245/34)

Language of the case: Romanian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Aurel Buga (Bacău, Romania) (represented by: M.Vasii, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendants: European Parliament, Council of the European Union and European Commission

Defendants:

Re:

Re:

Application for interim measures seeking to order the Romanian authorities to suspend the criminal proceedings opened against the applicant before a national court.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim measures is rejected. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim measures is rejected.

| 2. | Costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Costs are reserved.

---
(logo) TORCHLIGHT

 

**ANNUAL COMPLIANCE STATEMENT**

**CERTIFICATION**

 

CSAIL 2016-C6 Commercial Mortgage Trust,Commercial Mortgage Pass Through

Certificates, Series 2016-C6 (the“Trust”)

 

 

I, William A. Clarkson, on behalf ofTorchlight Loan Services, LLC, as Special Servicer (the “Certifying Servicer”),certify to Credit Suisse Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp. and its officers,directors and affiliates, and with the knowledge and intent that they will relyupon this certification, that:

 

1. I (or Servicing Officers under mysupervision) have reviewed the Certifying Servicer’s activities during thepreceding calendar year (the “Reporting Period”) and the Certifying Servicer’sperformance under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement; and

 

2. To the best of my knowledge, based onsuch review, the Certifying Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations underthe Pooling and Servicing Agreement in all material respects during theReporting Period. 

 

 

Date:  February 28, 2020

 

Torchlight Loan Services, LLC, as specialservicer

 

By: /s/ William A. Clarkson

 

Name: William A. Clarkson

 

Title: Authorized Signatory
No. 42008.

#### Protest 992170-G of Concord Watch Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of *Selsi*v. *United States*(C. D. 147) aneroid barometers were held dutiable as machines at 27% percent under paragraph 372 as claimed.
# C_2016364EN.01003601.xml

| 3.10.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 364/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.10.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 364/36

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 21 July 2016 — HB v Commission

(Case F-125/15) (1)

((Civil service - Officials - 2014 promotion exercise - Article 45(1) of the Staff Regulations - Comparison of the merits - 2011 and 2012 staff reports - Absence of several months due to maternity leave in 2013 - Staff report lacking any substantive assessment for the year in question - Decision not to promote the applicant in 2014 - Duty to provide a statement of reasons - Consideration of the comparative merits - No recommendation from the Joint Promotion Committee - Access to the applicant’s individual computerised file - Composition of the Joint Promotion Committee - Discrimination based on gender - Non-material damage))

(2016/C 364/43)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: HB (represented by: S. Orlandi and T. Martin, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: C. Berardis-Kayser and G. Berscheid, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of the Commission’s decision not to promote the applicant to grade AD 8 in the 2014 promotion exercise and compensation for the non-material damage which the applicant claims to have suffered.

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders HB to bear half of her own costs; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders HB to bear half of her own costs;

| 3. | Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay half of HB’s costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay half of HB’s costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 398, 30/11/2015, p. 80.

---
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-12-0000840 02-SEP-2014 01:58 PM SCWC-12-0000840 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI ' I

STATE OF HAWAI ' I, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs. ANDREW E. SHIMKUS, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-12-0000840; CASE NO. 1DTA-12-00225) ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.) Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant Andrew E. Shimkus’s Application for Writ of Certiorari, filed on August 13, 2014, is hereby accepted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no oral argument will be heard in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant to Rule 34(c) of the Hawai ' i Rules of Appellate Procedure, move for retention of oral argument. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai ' i, September 2, 2014. Jonathan Burge for petitioner /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack /s/ Michael D. Wilson
# C_2016305EN.01003102.xml

| 22.8.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 305/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.8.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 305/31

---

Judgment of the General Court of 5 July 2016 — Bundesverband Souvenir — Geschenke — Ehrenpreise v EUIPO — Freistaat Bayern (NEUSCHWANSTEIN)

(Case T-167/15) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Proceedings for a declaration of invalidity - EU word mark NEUSCHWANSTEIN - Absolute grounds for refusal - Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - No distinctive character - Distinctive character - Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 - No bad faith))

(2016/C 305/43)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Bundesverband Souvenir — Geschenke — Ehrenpreise eV (Veitsbronn, Germany) (represented by: B. Bittner, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Schifko, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Freistaat Bayern (Germany) (represented by: M. Müller, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 22 January 2015 (Case R 28/2014-5), relating to proceedings for a declaration of invalidity between Bundesverband Souvenir — Geschenke — Ehrenpreise and Freistaat Bayern.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Bundesverband Souvenir — Geschenke — Ehrenpreise eV to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Bundesverband Souvenir — Geschenke — Ehrenpreise eV to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 178, 1.6.2015.

1

---
# C_2016402EN.01004202.xml

| 31.10.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 402/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.10.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 402/42

---

Judgment of the General Court of 20 September 2016 — Excalibur City v EUIPO — Ferrero (MERLIN’S KINDERWELT)

(Case T-565/15) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU word mark MERLIN’S KINDERWELT - Earlier national word mark KINDER - Relative ground for refusal - No similarity between the signs - No likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2016/C 402/49)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Excalibur City s.r.o. (Znojmo, Czech Republic) (represented by: E. Engin-Deniz, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Simandlova and A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Ferrero SpA (Alba, Italy) (represented by: L. Ghedina and F. Jacobacci, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 9 July 2015 (Case R 1538/2014-1), relating to opposition proceedings between Ferrero and Excalibur City.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 9 July 2015 (Case R 1538/2014-1); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 9 July 2015 (Case R 1538/2014-1);

| 2. | Orders EUIPO to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Excalibur City s.r.o.; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders EUIPO to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Excalibur City s.r.o.;

| 3. | Orders Ferrero SpA to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Ferrero SpA to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 398, 30.11.2015.

1

---
Case No. 9,216.

#### The MARY JANE VAUGHAN.

[Cited in Quinn v. The Transport, Case No. 11.516. Nowhere reported; opinion not now accessible.]
```

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 249 (Wednesday, December 29, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 82127]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-32880]

[[Page 82127]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 7278]

Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Central Nigeria Unmasked: Arts of the Benue River 
Valley''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 
236-3 of August 28, 2000, I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``Central Nigeria Unmasked: Arts of the 
Benue River Valley,'' imported from abroad for temporary exhibition 
within the United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are 
imported pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign owners or 
custodians. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the 
exhibit objects at the Fowler Museum at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, 
from on or about February 13, 2011, until on or about July 24, 2011, 
the National Museum of African Art, Smithsonian Institution, 
Washington, DC, from on or about September 14, 2011, until on or about 
March 4, 2012, the Cantor Center for the Visual Arts, Stanford 
University, Palo Alto, California, from on or about May 16, 2012, until 
on or about September 2, 2012, and at possible additional exhibitions 
or venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. I have 
ordered that Public Notice of these Determinations be published in the 
Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Paul W. Manning, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6469). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, 
Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: December 21, 2010.
Ann Stock,
Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, 
Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2010-32880 Filed 12-28-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
Before the Second Division,

January 11, 1939

No. 40396.

#### Protest 788575-G of H. A. Caesar & Co. (New York).

Tilson, Judge:

In this suit against the United States the plaintiffs claim that the merchandise is entitled to a’ reduction of 20 percent- of the rates of duty or tax provided by law or to the benefit of such reduced rate as is specified in any treaty or trade agreement by virtue of treaty or trade agreement with the country of exportation, or section 350 (a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended.

In his brief filed herein counsel for the plaintiffs set out his contention as follows:

> It is here claimed that the merchandise at bar is entitled to a 20% reduction in duties in accordance with the allowance made by said trade agreement with Cuba published in T. D. 47232. Under this agreement and by virtue of the proclamation cited, the merchandise at bar from Cuba would be entitled to a 20% reduction from the duties specified in the Tariff Act of 1930 by virtue of the last paragraph of Article III of the trade agreement. The merchandise at bar is not covered by Schedule II of said trade agreement.

In section 350 (b) of an act dated June 12, 1934, amending the Tariff Act of 1930, the Congress specifically provided that:

> Nothing in this section shall be construed to prevent the application, with respect to rates of duty established under this section pursuant to agreements with countries other than Cuba, of the provisions of the treaty of commercial reciprocity concluded between the United States and the Republic of Cuba on December *53611, 1902, or to preclude giving effect to an exclusive agreement with Cuba concluded under this section, modifying the existing preferential customs treatment, of any article the growth, produce, or manufacture of Cuba * * *.

In the above-quoted section the Congress has in plain and unambiguous language expressed not only a desire, but a determination, not only to continue the preferential treatment accorded to articles the growth, produce, or manufacture-of Cuba, under the treaty of commercial reciprocity concluded between the United States and the Republic of Cuba on December 11, 1902, but made certain-that when that treaty of commercial reciprocity was concluded or superseded by any other treaty, the same preferential treatment should be accorded to Cuba by the United States. This is nothing moré than a continuation of the intent of the Congress expressed in each act since the conclusion of the treaty of commercial reciprocity between the United States and the Republic of Cuba on December 11, 1902, to accord to Cuba exclusive preferential treatment with respect to the importation into the United States of any article the growth, produce or manufacture of Cuba.

We find nothing in said section 350, or the trade agreements referred to by counsel for the plaintiffs in their brief filed herein, in the light of the construction placed thereon by the courts, which would require or permit us to accept the construction contended for by counsel for the plaintiffs. All of the claims of the plaintiffs are, therefore, overruled. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
No. 53235.

#### Amalgamated Textile, Ltd., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 75907-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
Lake George

Lake Oneida

LAKE

ONTARIO

York

James

Lake

Champlain

Saint Lawrence

Mohawk

Hudson

R ci helieu

Delawa r e

Susquehanna

Chesapeake

Bay

Delaware

Bay

ATLANTIC

OCEAN

ADIRONDACK

MOUNTAINS

New York City

leaves July 5 1777

Philadelphia

Annapolis

Williamsburg

MARYLAND

NEW

JERSEY

VIRGINIA

PENNSYLVANIA

Province of

QUÉBEC

CONN

MASS

NEW YORK

D

E

L

A

W

A

R

E

Fort Edward Fort Oswego

Fort Crown Point

Fort Dayton

Stony Point

Fort Montgomery

Fort Clinton

Fort Mercer

LONG ISLAND

Hubbardton

July 7 1777

Bennington

Aug 16 1777 Oriskany

Aug 6 1777

Fort Ticonderoga

July 6 1777

Fort Anne

July 8 1777 

Freeman Farm

Sept 19 1777

Fort Stanwix

Aug 3-23 1777

Bemis Heights Oct 7 1777

Fort Mifflin

Nov 16 1777

Whitemarsh

Dec 5-8 1777

Paoli Sept 21 1777

Brandywine

Sept 9-11 1777

Germantown

Oct 4-5 1777

Princeton

Jan 3 1777

Trenton

Dec 25-26 1776

Cape Charles

Cape May

Cape Henry

Valley Forge

Head of Elk arrives Aug 25 1777

York

Montréal

Norfolk

Saint Johns

Albany

Morristown

Saratoga

Howe

0

0

50 Miles

50 Kilometers

North

1777
(Reap. Dec. 8406)

Entry No. 49-R.

#### Valley Evaporating Co. *v.*United States

(Decided March 17, 1955)

*Lawrence & Tuttle*for the plaintiff.

*Warren E. Burger,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Olivee, Chief Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for tbe parties hereto:

> 1) The market value or price at the time of exportation of the American apples in boxes of United States origin involved in this case, at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale for home consumption to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, was US $0.64 per bushel of 50 pounds, which included the total cost of alterations of the type referred to in *Hallauer v. US,*40 CCPA (Customs) 197, CAD 518, of US $0.113 per bushel of 50 pounds and the value of the boxes of United States origin $0.265 per bushel of 50 pounds.

> 2) The American apples in boxes of United States origin involved in this case are of the same character as the American apples in boxes of Canadian origin in the case of *Hallauer v. US,*40 CCPA (Customs) 197, CAD, 518, and the record therein may be incorporated herein.

> 3) There was no higher export value for such or similar American apples in boxes of United States origin at the time of exportation thereof.

> 4) This case may be submitted on the foregoing stipulation.

On tbe agreed facts I find tbe foreign value, as tbat value is' defined in section 402 (c) of tbe Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by section 8 of tbe Customs Administrative Act of 1938, to be tbe proper basis for tbe determination of tbe value of tbe mercbandise bere involved, and tbat sucb value was United States dollars 0.64 per busbel of 50 pounds, *475which included United States dollars 0.113 per bushel of 50 pounds for the total cost of alterations, and United States dollars 0.265 per bushel of 50 pounds for the value of the boxes of United States origin.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
EXHIBIT 32.2
                                                                   ------------


                              UNITED-GUARDIAN, INC.
               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of  United-Guardian,  Inc. (the
"Registrant") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending June 30, 2003, as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Kenneth H. Globus,  President  and Chief  Financial  Officer of the  Registrant,
hereby  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  section  1350,  as adopted  pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

    (1) the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section  13(a) or
        15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects,  the financial  condition  and  result  of  operations  of the
        Company.

August 5, 2003                            /s/ Kenneth H. Globus
                                          ---------------------------
                                          Kenneth H. Globus
                                          President and Chief Financial Officer