alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 23****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-78075,333-61617, 333-42890, 333-42976 and 333-88048 of US LEC Corp. on Form S-8, in RegistrationStatement No. 333-111536 and 333-115545 on Form S-3 of US LEC Corp. and in Registration StatementNo. 333-12023 and Nos. 333-120232-01 through 120232-11 on Form S-4 of US LEC Corp., of our reportdated March 3, 2006, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of US LEC Corp. for the yearended December 31, 2005./s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
#### In re Ellen O. DUNN, Petitioner.

No. MISC. 796.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Aug. 31, 2005.

Ellen 0. Dunn, pro se.

Before MICHEL, Chief Judge, NEWMAN and SCHALL, Circuit Judges.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Ellen 0. Dunn petitions for a writ of mandamus to direct the Merit Systems Protection Board to, inter alia, reopen her case and award her additional remedies.

Dunn filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia against the Department of the Army, alleging discrimination. Dunn also filed an appeal with the Merit Systems Protection Board concerning her later removal. After trial but before entry of judgment in the district court, the parties entered into a global settlement agreement that settled the district court action and the Board appeal. After notification from the parties, the Board dismissed the petition for review on September 9, 1999. Dunn was represented by counsel during the proceedings. Dunn did not seek review of the Board’s dismissal order.

The remedy of mandamus is available only in extraordinary situations to correct a clear abuse of discretion or usurpation of judicial power. *In re Calmar, Inc.,*854 F.2d 461, 464 (Fed.Cir.1988). A party seeking a writ bears the burden of proving that she has no other means of attaining the relief desired, *Mallard v. U.S. Dist. Court for the Southern Dist. of Iowa,*490 U.S. 296, 309, 109 S.Ct. 1814, 104 L.Ed.2d 318 (1989), and that the right to issuance of the writ is “clear and indisputable,” *Allied Chemical Corp. v. Daiflon, Inc.,*449 U.S. 33, 35, 101 S.Ct. 188, 66 L.Ed.2d 193 (1980).

Dunn has not shown that her right to a writ is clear and indisputable. Having settled the case nearly six years ago, Dunn now seeks to reopen her case at the Board, alleging that she was pressured into settlement, that there was a conspiracy or fraud resulting in the settlement, and that she could have received more relief than she obtained during settlement. Dunn has not demonstrated that she is entitled to mandamus relief.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

The petition for a writ of mandamus is denied.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT

WILLIAM WINSTON,

Petitioner

v.

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS PHILADELPHIA COUNTY,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 110 EM 2018

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 26th day of November , 2018, the Application for Leave to File

Original Process is GRANTED. Considering that Petitioner’s PCRA petition has been

pending for approximately three years with no judicial action appearing on the docket, the

Application for Writ of Mandamus is GRAN TED.

Further, the common pleas court docket sheet indicates that counsel’s

representation is inactive. See Commonwealth v. Winston

, CP

- 51

- CR

- 0402771

- 1975

. The Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County is DIRECTED to determine issues

rela tive to Peti tioner’s representation status within 60 days, including whether he is

entitled to court

- appointed counsel. See Pa.R.Crim.P. 904(C).

The Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County is further DIRECTED to

ensure that, following resolution of the represen tation issue, the final adjudication of the

PCRA petition occurs in due course.[110 EM 2018]

- 2

The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to serve the order on the President Judge of the

Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County, as well as on the Philadelphia District

Attorney’s Office.
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Manpower Resources in Chemistry and Chemical Engineering

              																	Sharp, Laure M., 1921-2005					,	Shapiro, Theresa R.					 and 	United States. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 						*Manpower Resources in Chemistry and Chemical Engineering : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 1132*,												Washington: 								U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 										1953,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/4457,			accessed on September 25, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 251 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 6, 2007 

Received and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Commending the National Renewable Energy Laboratory for 

its work of promoting energy efficiency for 30 years. 

Whereas in 1977 the Solar Energy Research Institute opened 

and was designated a National Laboratory of the United 

States Department of Energy; 

Whereas in September 1991 President George H.W. Bush 

changed the institute’s name to the National Renewable 

Energy Laboratory (‘‘NREL’’); 


cnoel on PRODPC60 with BILLS_CN
2 

HCON 251 RFS 

Whereas the NREL is the principal research laboratory for 

the United States Department of Energy’s Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy and also provides 

research expertise for the Office of Science and the Office 

of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability; 

Whereas the NREL is the Nation’s, and the world’s, preeminent laboratory for renewable energy and energy efficiency research and development; 

Whereas renewable energy and energy efficiency technologies 

are key to creating a clean energy future for not only the 

United States, but the world; 

Whereas the NREL’s focused research and development capabilities are positioned to advance national energy goals 

by developing innovations to change the way we power 

our homes and businesses, and fuel our cars; 

Whereas the NREL has worked vigorously through research 

and development to develop wind energy resulting in innovative designs, larger turbines, and increased efficiencies leading to dramatic reductions in energy costs; 

Whereas the NREL has also developed hydrogen energy scenarios that could be used to power the future and develop 

hydrogen infrastructure and delivery systems; and 

Whereas the NREL has developed biomass research technology, which provides biomass industries with rapid analytical tools for making the highest value applications of 

biomass or analyzing biomass: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That Congress— 

3 (1) commends the National Renewable Energy 

4 Laboratory for its work of promoting energy effiVerDate Aug 31 2005 02:46 Dec 07, 2007 Jkt 069200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\HC251.RFS HC251

cnoel on PRODPC60 with BILLS_CN
3 

HCON 251 RFS 

1 ciency for 30 years and seeking other avenues of en2 ergy independence because it enhances our national 

3 security, sustains our environment and creates jobs; 

4 (2) recognizes the achievements of the scientists 

5 and employees of the NREL and their exemplary 

6 service to the United States for 30 years; and 

7 (3) directs the Clerk of the House to transmit 

8 a copy of this resolution to the NREL for appro9 priate display. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 5, 

2007. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 


cnoel on PRODPC60 with BILLS_CN
CHUKCHI SEA

BATHYMETRIC MAP . SOLIVIK ISLAND

|
i
1

690000, |

| |

9390

Lh

“g
OT
Y) kA

|
|
:

J
a

B
BR

iN

on
Ny

\

\

Aa) REA

S
8
BY

\

RN

2

\

Ev UN LHOIMNIVM

\

S

77go000m.N

927 3

eA U,

972

777.9000m.N

i 4)

3
2.
S| sotivik\ | ISLAND

i i r t t . +t i p ! : 3 0000%-E]

5] 0000m.E,T

i Base map information including bathymetry was compiled by the National OUTER CONTINENTAL SHELF RESOURCE MANAGEMENT MAP. | SOLIVIK ISLAND

Ocean Service (NOS). Bathymetry was compiled from NOS hydrographic |
mee sire ty honk eration, cher ses UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE NOS NR 3-4 (OCS) |
ingex} Y NATIONAL OCEAN. SERVICE -
Hydrographic Organization (IHO) Special. Publication 44 accuracy NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION 1es° HYDROGRAPHIC SURVEY INDEX 162°
| standards or those used at the date of the survey. This is a reproduction NATIONAL OCEAN SERVICE vie me
| of a facsimile of the bathymetric manuscript and does not necessarily

represent the final publication. This information is not intended for navi- 1986

Supplementary
| gational purposes. Data

Bathymetric Contour Interval: 10 meters to maximum depth, supplemented Produced at Washington, D.C. INDEX TO ;
| - by 2 meter intervals. ; for jege AOJOINING SHEETS soe ‘
Datum: Mean Lower Low Water (MLLW). 3 72 . L
7 Posey |
ghversal Transverse Mercator Grid. Zone 3; 10,000 meter ticks (---) are UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR NR 2 |
MINERALS MANAGEMENT SERVICE

Protraction Diagram data shown in a subdued (screened) black Was com-
piled by the Minerals Management Service (MMS). ;

THIS MAP 1S NOT A LEGAL DOCUMENT for Federal leasing purposes, for

such purposes use the MMS Outer Continental Shelf Official Protraction TRANSVERSE MERCATOR PROJECTION

coveerr ivi [WaINwarghty i
Ns | foun |" NR} . \
NR oa

H-7753

Diagrams. |
POINT tav
. . cale 1:250,000 West
Heavy tine(s) indicate limits of these protraction diagrams. S , : |
leavy line(s) P 'g 5 ° 10 15 20 Statute Miles NR SS
70° 70° |
= oe
5 0 i 165° Photographic copies of the above and prior surveys 16: 168° {50°
HYDROGRAPHIC SURVEY INFORMATION 5 10 15 20 25 30 Kilometers may be obtained, at the cost of reproduction, by 8
addressing the Director (N/CG243), National
suRVEY 5. 9 5 10 15 Nautical Miles Ocean Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric
suRvey survey survey LINE SPACING —— } Administration, Rockville, Maryland 20852
NUMBER DATE SCALE {NAUT. MILES)
#7665 1950 1:40,000 10.3.0
#7751 1960 1:20,000 03-35
17953 1949-50 £40,000, 05-20
2656 1962 1:100,000 20-12
ho8eo8 1962 1:100,000 aoe
AMENDMENT
                                     TO THE
                                 MICROAGE, INC.
                       1995 ASSOCIATE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN


     Effective  March  15,  1995,  the  shareholders  of  MicroAge,   Inc.  (the
"Company")  approved the adoption of the  MicroAge,  Inc. 1995  Associate  Stock
Purchase Plan (the "Plan").  By this instrument,  the Company desires to suspend
purchases of stock by Participants under the Plan.

     1. The  changes  made to the Plan by this  Amendment  are  effective  as of
December 2, 1999.

     2. This  Amendment  shall amend only those  Sections  specified  herein and
those Sections not amended hereby shall remain in full force and effect.

     3. Section 5(d) of the Plan is hereby  amended by adding to end thereof the
following new sentence:  Notwithstanding the foregoing or any other provision of
the Plan to the contrary,  as of December 2, 1999,  the date this  Amendment was
approved by the Board,  Participant  contributions  under the Plan are suspended
until such time as the Board takes action to permit additional  contributions to
the Plan.

     4. Section 6 of the Plan is hereby  amended by adding a new  subsection (g)
which shall provide as follows:

     (g)  SUSPENSION  OF PURCHASES.  Notwithstanding  the foregoing or any other
     provision of the Plan to the contrary,  Stock remaining available under the
     Plan as of the Purchase  Date next  following  the  effective  date of this
     Amendment  shall  be  purchased  by the  Custodian  and  allocated  to each
     Participant's  Stock  Account  in  proportion  to the  amount  held in each
     Participant's  Cash  Account   immediately  prior  to  the  Stock  purchase
     contemplated by this paragraph. For purposes of the preceding sentence, any
     Participant  contributions  for the  Subscription  Period  that  exceed the
     limitations  set forth in Sections 5(d), 6(a) or any other provision of the
     Plan shall be disregarded.  Any amounts that remain in a Participant's Cash
     Account  following the purchase and allocation of all remaining  Stock that
     has been  reserved  under  the  Plan  shall be  repaid  to the  Participant
     (without  interest) as  specified in Section 7(b) as if each  Participant's
     enrollment in the Plan had terminated.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment to be executed as
of this 27th day of January, 2000.

                                        MICROAGE, INC.


                                        By: Jeffrey D. McKeever
                                            ------------------------------------
                                        Its: Chairman of the Board and Chief
                                             Executive Officer
# Title

# Summary

# Total, Dissolved Nutrients

# Chlorophyll

# BOD

# DOC

# TPCN
### FW: EPA/State Workgroup re: developing NPDES permits fo r aquatic pesticide use

Meredith William H. (DNREC)

to:

Jack Faulk, Susan Lewis

07/14/2009 09:30 PM

Cc:

"Capotosto, Paul", "Wolfe, Roger"

Show Details

JACK/SUSAN

– fyi

– of possible interest or use to you or your respective staffs, as your agency and our

Workgroup further plunges into trying to develop NPDES permits for aquatic pesticide use.

The first 2 documents attached above are from Paul Capotosto, head of Connecticut’s mosquito control program

– one describes the state’s ability to issue permits for aquatic pesticide use, and other pertains to general

statutes for mosquito control work in Connecticut. In keeping with this second theme, I’ve also attached above

Delaware’s state enabling statute that authorizes us to perform mosquito control work, along with some

prescriptions in statute for how it must be done. You already have some pertinent parts of this relative to our

mosquitocide spraying as contained in the Power Point slides that you left with on June 30th, but I thought that I

might as well now give you our entire state statute (which was last revised and modernized a bit by our General

Assembly back in 2007).

Cheers, BILL. 

### Page 1 of 1

5/12/2010 file://C:\Documents and Settin g s\ j faulk\Local Settin g s\Tem p \notesFCBCEE\~web1328.htm
# C_2016364EN.01003702.xml

| 3.10.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 364/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.10.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 364/37

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 21 July 2016 — Pinto Ferreira v Commission

(Case F-127/15) (1)

((Civil service - Officials - Disciplinary measure - Article 9(2) of Annex IX to the Staff Regulations - Withholding an amount from the pension - Outside activity without permission - No request for prior permission))

(2016/C 364/45)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: António Gaspar Pinto Ferreira (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: C.W. Godfrey, C. Antoine and M. Gomes Lopes, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: C. Ehrbar and F. Simonetti, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of the Commission’s decision imposing the disciplinary measure of withholding EUR 185 from the applicant’s pension for a 12-month period and taking effect on the date on which he is to retire, on account of the exercise of an outside activity without permission.

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of 16 December 2014 whereby the appointing authority of the European Commission imposed on Mr António Gaspar Pinto Ferreira the measure provided for in Article 9(2) of Annex IX to the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of 16 December 2014 whereby the appointing authority of the European Commission imposed on Mr António Gaspar Pinto Ferreira the measure provided for in Article 9(2) of Annex IX to the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union;

| 2. | Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by Mr Pinto Ferreira. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by Mr Pinto Ferreira.

---

(1)  OJ C 414, 14/12/2015, p. 43.

---
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 83 (Tuesday, May 1, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 23819-23820]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-8259]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States. 
Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained 
from the National Information Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than May 25, 2007.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (David Tatum, Vice President) 
1000 Peachtree Street, N.E., Atlanta, Georgia 30309:
    1. WGNB Corp., Carrollton, Georgia; to merge with First Haralson 
Corporation, and thereby indirectly acquire First National Bank of 
Georgia, both of Buchanan, Georgia.


[[Page 23820]]


    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, April 26, 
2007.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. E7-8259 Filed 4-30-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
<PAGE>   1
                                                                 EXHIBIT 10.39.2

                    AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

     Amendment No. 2 dated as of February 15, 2000 (the "Amendment") to the
Employment Agreement and any exhibits thereto (the "Agreement") by and between
Universal Access, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company") and William J.
Coyne III (the "Employee"). Any capitalized terms not defined herein shall have
the meanings assigned to those terms in the Agreement.

                                    RECITALS

     A.   Company and Employee entered into the Agreement on February 1, 2000.

     B.   Company and Employee desire to amend the Agreement to reflect certain
changes agreed to by the Company and the Employee.

     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements
hereinafter set forth, and for other good and valuable consideration, the
receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, it is hereby agreed as
follows:

     1.   Effective as of February 1, 2000, all references in the Agreement to
"Executive Vice President, Sales" shall be deleted and replaced by references
to "Executive Vice President, Client Services".

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be
executed as of February 15, 2000.

          COMPANY:                      UNIVERSAL ACCESS, INC.,
                                        a Delaware corporation

                                        By: /s/ Patrick C. Shutt
                                            --------------------------
                                        Name:   Patrick C. Shutt
                                        Title:  President and CEO

          EMPLOYEE:                     By: /s/ William J. Coyne III
                                            --------------------------
                                        Name:   William J. Coyne III
Exhibit 32.2   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002    In connection with the Report of Competitive Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Johnnie D. Johnson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.    Johnnie D. Johnson Chief Financial Officer  June 19, 2013  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Competitive Technologies and will be retained by Competitive Technologies and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.