alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Harry P. TEICHMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 05-5180.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Aug. 15, 2005.

Harry P. Teichman, pro se.

*348ORDER

Order Vacated, See 2005 WL 2210318.

The appellant having failed to pay the docketing fee required by Federal Circuit Rule 52(a)(1) within the time permitted by the rules, it is

ORDERED that the notice of appeal be, and the same hereby is, DISMISSED, for failure to prosecute in accordance with the rules.
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.3

                             CERTIFICATE OF TRUST

                                      OF

                            ASTORIA CAPITAL TRUST I


     This Certificate of Trust of Astoria Capital Trust I (the "Trust"), is
being duly executed and filed by the undersigned trustee to form a business
trust under the Delaware Business Trust Act (12 Del. C. (S) 3801 et seq.) (the
                                                ---  -           -- ---
"Act").

     (a) Name.  The name of the business trust formed hereby is Astoria Capital
         ----
Trust I.

     (b) Delaware Trustee.  The name and business address of the trustee of the
         ----------------
Trust in the State of Delaware is Wilmington Trust Company, Rodney Square North,
1100 N. Market Street, Wilmington, Delaware 19890-0001, Attention: Corporate
Trust Administration.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate of Trust
in accordance with Section 3811 of the Act.

                              WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY, not in its individual
                              capacity but solely as Trustee



                              By: /s/ Donald G. MacKelcan
                                  -----------------------
                                  Name: Donald G. MacKelcan
                                  Title: Vice President
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsAn aeroelastician's perspective of wind tunnel and flight experiences with active control of structural response and stabilityActive controls technology is assessed based on a review of most of the wind-tunnel and flight tests and actual applications of active control concepts since the late sixties. The distinction is made between so-called ""rigid-body'' active control functions and those that involve significant modification of structural elastic response or stability. Both areas are reviewed although the focus is on the latter area. The basic goals and major results of the various studies or applications are summarized, and the anticipated use of active controls on current and near-future research and demonstration aircraft is discussed. Some of the ""holes'' remaining in the feasbility/benefits demonstration of active controls technology are examined.Document ID19840015856Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsHanson, P. W.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 4, 2013Publication DateApril 1, 1984Subject CategoryStructural MechanicsReport/Patent NumberNASA-TM-85761NAS 1.15:85761Accession Number84N23924Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-33-43-07Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19840015856.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
(Reap. Dec. 9386)

#### Finwood Industries, Inc. *v.*United States

Entry Nos. 9745; 9744.

(Decided April 7, 1959)

*Siegel, Mandell & Davidson*for the plantiff.

*George Cochran Dowb,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Mollison, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement enumerated above were submitted for decision upon stipulation of counsel for the parties limiting the appeals to the plywood, exported from Finland in the year 1956, covered by the invoices where the merchandise was advanced in value and appraised on the basis of home market value. On the agreed facts contained in the said stipulation, I find foreign *595value, as defined in section 402(c), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, to be the proper basis for determination of the value of the said merchandise, and that said value, in each instance, was the appraised value, less 4 per centum, packed.

As to all items of merchandise where appraisement was based upon the entered invoice unit values, the said appeals for reappraisement, having been abandoned, are dismissed.

Judgment will issue accordingly.
## F IFTH 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ Cas e No. 5D 22- 988 LT Case No. 2010

- CF

- 2633 -A

_____________________________ H ENRY L EE B AKER , IV , Ap pellant,

v. S TATE OF F LORIDA , Ap pellee.

_____________________________ On a ppeal from the Circuit Court f or Semino l e Co unty
. Jo hn D. G alluzzo , J udge

. Matthew J

. M etz, P ublic D efende r, a nd Ge o rge D. E

. B urden , Assistant P ublic D e fender, D aytona B e ach, f or A ppellant. Ashley M oody, A ttorney G eneral, Tallahassee, a nd Pamela J. Koller , A ssistant A ttorney Ge neral, D aytona B each, f or A ppellee. December 12, 2023
P ER C URIAM
. A FFIRMED . W ALLIS , E ISNA UGLE , and B OATWRIGHT , JJ., concur .2 _____________________________ N ot final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331 .

_____________________________
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 14 (Tuesday, January 23, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 2769]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-858]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service

26 CFR Parts 1, 301 and 602

[TD 9300]
RIN 1545-BC15


Guidance Necessary To Facilitate Business Electronic Filing; 
Correction

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Correction to final regulations.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document contains correction to final regulations (TD 
9300) that were published in the Federal Register on Friday, December 
8, 2006 (71 FR 71040) designed to eliminate regulatory impediments to 
the electronic filing of certain income tax returns and other forms.

DATES: The correction is effective December 8, 2006.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nathan Rosen, (202) 622-4910 (not a 
toll-free number).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    The correction notice that is the subject of this document is under 
sections 170, 556, 565, 936, 1017, 1368, 1377, 1502, 1503, 6038B and 
7701 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Need for Correction

    As published, final regulations (TD 9300) contain errors that may 
prove to be misleading and are in need of clarification.

Correction of Publication

    Accordingly, the publication of the final regulations (TD 9300), 
which was the subject of FR Doc. E6-20734, is corrected as follows:
    On page 71041, column 1, in the preamble, under the paragraph 
heading ``January 2006 Final Regulations Facilitating Electronic 
Filing'', last paragraph of the column, second line, the language 
``Treasury released TD 9243, (TD 9243,'' is corrected to read 
``Treasury released final regulations (TD 9243,''.
    On page 71041, column 2, in the preamble, under the paragraph 
heading ``May 2006 Regulations Facilitating Electronic Filing'', first 
paragraph, second line, the language ``Treasury Department released TD 
9264'' is corrected to read ``Treasury Department released final and 
temporary regulations (TD 9264, 2006-26 I.R.B. 1150 [71 FR 30591])''.

LaNita Van Dyke,
Chief, Publications and Regulations Branch, Legal Processing Division, 
Associate Chief Counsel, (Procedure and Administration).
[FR Doc. E7-858 Filed 1-22-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 87 (Monday, May 7, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 25757]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-8647]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States. 
Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained 
from the National Information Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than May 31, 2007.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond (A. Linwood Gill, III, Vice 
President) 701 East Byrd Street, Richmond, Virginia 23261-4528:
    1. Chain Bridge Bancorp, McLean, Virginia; to become a bank holding 
company by acquiring 100 percent of the voting shares of Chain Bridge 
Bank, National Association, McLean, Virginia (in organization).

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, May 2, 2007.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. E7-8647 Filed 5-4-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
PUBLIC LAW 106–350—OCT. 24, 2000 114 STAT. 1361

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 3632 (S. 2051):

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 106–825 (Comm. on Resources).

SENATE REPORTS: No. 106–376 accompanying S. 2051 (Comm. on Energy and

Natural Resources).

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 146 (2000):

Sept. 12, considered and passed House.

Oct. 5, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 106–350

106th Congress

An Act

To revise the boundaries of the Golden Gate National Recreation Area, and for

other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Golden Gate National Recreation

Area Boundary Adjustment Act of 2000’’.

SEC. 2. ADDITIONS TO THE GOLDEN GATE NATIONAL RECREATION

AREA.

Section 2(a) of the Act entitled ‘‘An Act to establish the Golden

Gate National Recreation Area in the State of California, and

for other purposes’’ (16 U.S.C. 460bb–1(a)) is amended by adding

at the end the following: ‘‘The recreation area shall also include

the lands generally depicted on the map entitled ‘Additions to

Golden Gate National Recreation Area’, numbered NPS–80,076,

and dated July 2000/ PWR–PLRPC.’’.

Approved October 24, 2000.

16 USC 460bb

note.

Golden Gate

National

Recreation Area

Boundary

Adjustment Act

of 2000.

Oct. 24, 2000

[H.R. 3632]
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-41465

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

RANDALL JAY ADDISON

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:06-CR-581-ALL

Before REAVLEY, SMITH, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Randall Jay Addison appeals the 24-month sentence imposed following his

plea of guilty to transporting illegal aliens for financial gain. We affirm.

He contends that he was entitled to an offense level reduction for playing

a minor role in the offense. Although Addison might have played a relatively

minor role in a larger conspiracy to smuggle aliens, he fails to show that his role

was minor in relation to the limited conduct of transporting the aliens for which

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

December 14, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 06-41465

2

he was held accountable. See United States v. Garcia, 242 F.3d 593, 598 (5th

Cir. 2001); United States v. Buenrostro, 868 F.2d 135, 138 (5th Cir. 1989) (noting

that one who merely transports contraband is not entitled to reduction). The

district court did not commit clear error by refusing to reduce Addison’s offense

level. 

Addison contends that he should have received a downward departure

from the guidelines range because his criminal history was overrepresented.

This court lacks authority to review the district court's refusal to depart

downward from the advisory guidelines range because the decision was not

based upon any erroneous belief that the district court lacked the authority to

depart. See United States v. Hernandez, 457 F.3d 416, 424 n.5 (5th Cir. 2006).

Addison contends that his sentence was unreasonable. Addison has not

rebutted the presumption that his sentence at the low end of the advisory

guidelines range was reasonable. See United States v. Alonzo, 435 F.3d 551, 554

(5th Cir. 2006); see also Rita v. United States, 127 S. Ct. 2456, 2462-63 (2007)

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
No. 75-6800.

#### Figueroa *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
122 STAT. 1552 PUBLIC LAW 110–235—MAY 23, 2008 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 3029: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 154 (2008): 

May 15, considered and passed Senate. 

May 20, considered and passed House. 

Æ 

Public Law 110–235 

110th Congress 

An Act 

To provide for an additional temporary extension of programs under the Small 

Business Act and the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, and for other purposes. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. ADDITIONAL TEMPORARY EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATION 

OF PROGRAMS UNDER THE SMALL BUSINESS ACT AND 

THE SMALL BUSINESS INVESTMENT ACT OF 1958. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1 of the Act entitled ‘‘An Act to 

extend temporarily certain authorities of the Small Business 

Administration’’, approved October 10, 2006 (Public Law 109–316; 

120 Stat. 1742), as most recently amended by section 1 of Public 

Law 110–136 (121 Stat. 1453), is amended by striking ‘‘May 23, 

2008’’ each place it appears and inserting ‘‘March 20, 2009’’. 

(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by subsection (a) 

shall take effect on May 22, 2008. 

Approved May 23, 2008. 

May 23, 2008 

[S. 3029] 


dkrause on GSDDPC44 with PUBLIC LAWS
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v MAJOR SMITH, Private, U. S. Marine Corps, Appellant

18 USCMA 607, 40 CMR 319

No. 22,196

September 26, 1969

*Lieutenant Donald B. Brant, Jr.,*JAGC, USNR, was on the pleadings for Appellant, Accused.

*Colonel C. R. Larouche,*USMC, and *Captain Charles E. Patterson,*USMC, were on the pleadings for Appellee, United States.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

When instructing the court on the sentence to be imposed, the president of the special court-martial which convicted the accused failed to give the court any guidance on the mechanics of voting, as prescribed in paragraph 766 (2), Manual for Courts-Martial, United States, 1951. The cited provision of the Manual provides in pertinent part as follows:

> “. . . [A]ny member who desires to propose a sentence writes his proposal on a slip of paper. The junior member collects these proposed sentences and submits them to the president. The court then votes on the proposed sentences, *beginning with the lightest,*until a sentence is adopted by the concurrence of the required number of members.” [Emphasis supplied.]

In United States v Johnson, 18 USCMA 436, 40 CMR 148, we held that it was prejudicial error to fail to instruct the court that it should begin by voting on the lightest sentence proposed. So, too, in this case. As we said in *Johnson,*at page 437:

> “A court, uninstructed as to this procedure, may well believe that the voting could properly commence with consideration of the most severe proposed sentence. Since we have no way of ascertaining what took place, *608the voting having been conducted in secret, and, inasmuch as, in our opinion, the matter concerned a substantial'right of the accused, the doctrine of plain error may be properly invoked. United States v Stephen, 15 USCMA 314, 35 CMR 286. Reversal as to sentence is required.”

See also United States v Newton, 18 USCMA 562, 40. CMR 274.

The decision of the board of review is reversed. The record of trial is returned to the Judge Advocate General of the Navy. A rehearing on sentence may be ordered.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

                    The companies listed in this notice have given notice under section 4 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843) (BHC Act) and Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225) to engage                     *de novo*, or to acquire or control voting securities or assets of a company, including the companies listed below, that engages either directly or through a subsidiary or other company, in a nonbanking activity that is listed in § 225.28 of Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.28) or that the Board has determined by Order to be closely related to banking and permissible for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise noted, these activities will be conducted throughout the United States.                

                    Each notice is available for inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notice also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing on the question whether the proposal complies with the standards of section 4 of the BHC Act. Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained from the National Information Center website at                     *www.ffiec.gov/​nic/​*.                

Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding the applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors not later than May 18, 2007.

**A. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas**                     (W. Arthur Tribble, Vice President) 2200 North Pearl Street, Dallas, Texas 75201-2272:                

*1. Professional Capital, Inc.*, Dallas, Texas; to engage                     *de novo*                     in management consulting activities, pursuant to section 225.28(b)(9)(i)(A) of Regulation Y.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, April 30, 2007.

Robert deV. Frierson,

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. E7-8482 Filed 5-2-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM UNION
CARBIDE CORPORATION'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 1997 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000100790
<NAME> UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                             214
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     1082
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        553
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  2028
<PP&E>                                            7274
<DEPRECIATION>                                    3809
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    6795
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             1221
<BONDS>                                           1494
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              140
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           155
<OTHER-SE>                                        1972
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      6795
<SALES>                                           1638
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  1638
<CGS>                                             1231
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     1231
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   122<F1>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  19
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    228
<INCOME-TAX>                                        66
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                157
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       157
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.03
<FN>
<F1>OTHER EXPENSES ARE EQUAL TO RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT OF 40 AND DEPRECIATION AND
AMORTIZATION OF 82.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>