alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 335 

Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for a celebration of the 100th 

anniversary of Alpha Kappa Alpha Sorority, Incorporated. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 24, 2008 

Ms. WATSON (for herself, Ms. EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON of Texas, and Ms. 

JACKSON-LEE of Texas) submitted the following concurrent resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for a celebration 

of the 100th anniversary of Alpha Kappa Alpha Sorority, 

Incorporated. 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), 

3 SECTION 1. USE OF CAPITOL GROUNDS FOR 100TH ANNI4 VERSARY CELEBRATION OF ALPHA KAPPA 

5 ALPHA SORORITY, INCORPORATED. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Alpha Kappa Alpha Sorority, In7 corporated (in this resolution referred to as the ‘‘spon8 sor’’), shall be permitted to sponsor a public event (in this 

9 resolution referred to as the ‘‘event’’) on the Capitol 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•HCON 335 IH 

1 Grounds to celebrate the 100th anniversary of Alpha 

2 Kappa Alpha Sorority, Incorporated. 

3 (b) DATE OF EVENT.—The event shall be held on 

4 July 17, 2008, or on such other date as the Speaker of 

5 the House of Representatives and the Committee on Rules 

6 and Administration of the Senate jointly designate. 

7 SEC. 2. TERMS AND CONDITIONS. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Under conditions to be prescribed 

9 by the Architect of the Capitol and the Capitol Police 

10 Board, the event shall be— 

11 (1) free of admission charge and open to the 

12 public; and 

13 (2) arranged not to interfere with the needs of 

14 Congress. 

15 (b) EXPENSES AND LIABILITIES.—The sponsor shall 

16 assume full responsibility for all expenses and liabilities 

17 incident to all activities associated with the event. 

18 SEC. 3. EVENT PREPARATIONS. 

19 Subject to the approval of the Architect of the Cap20 itol, the sponsor is authorized to erect upon the Capitol 

21 Grounds such stage, sound amplification devices, and 

22 other related structures and equipment as may be required 

23 for the event. 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
3 

•HCON 335 IH 

1 SEC. 4. ENFORCEMENT OF RESTRICTIONS. 

2 The Capitol Police Board shall provide for enforce3 ment of the restrictions contained in section 5104(c) of 

4 title 40, United States Code, concerning sales, advertise5 ments, displays, and solicitations on the Capitol Grounds, 

6 as well as other restrictions applicable to the Capitol 

7 Grounds, in connection with the event. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.40

                      SHARES FOR DEBT SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

Effective: May 1, 1999

BETWEEN:

      CYBEROAD GAMING CORPORATION, a St. Kitts corporation having a place of
      business at Box 174, Basseterre, St. Kitts, West Indies

                                                                         ("CGC")

AND

      eBANX.COM(Isle of Man) LTD, an Isle of Man corporation having a place of
      business at International House, Castle Hill, Victoria Road, Douglas, Isle
      of Man, IM42 4RB

                                                                       ("eBanx")

AND

      ASANOL MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, a Torotola corporation having an address at
      Road Town, Pasea Estate, PO Box 3149 Tortola

                                                                      ("Asanol")

WHEREAS,

CGC owes $306,437.51 to Asanol as of March 31, 1999

AND

Asanol agrees that the debt is $306,437.51

AND

Asanol wishes CGC to repay that debt



<PAGE>   2



AND

Asanol is willing to accept shares of CGC in settlement

NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY AGREED AS FOLLOWS:

1.0

      1.1   that in consideration of the payment by CGC of 200,000 common shares
            of Cyberoad Gaming Corp. and other good and valuable consideration,
            the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, Asanol
            hereby grants CGC and its affiliate eBanx full and final release
            from the debt of $306,437.51.

2.0   SUCCESSORS

      This Agreement shall enure to the benefit of and shall be binding upon
      all parties and their executors, successors and assigns.

3.0   GOVERNING LAW

      This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the
      laws of Isle of Man.

4.0   EXECUTION IN COUNTERPART

      This Amendment may be signed by the parties in as many counterparts as may
      be necessary, each of which so signed shall be deemed to be an original,
      and such counterpart together shall constitute one and the same instrument
      and notwithstanding the date of execution shall be deemed to bear the date
      as set forth below


                                       2



<PAGE>   3



IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have caused these presents to be executed
personally or by their duty authorized officers as of the day and year first
above written.

CYBEROAD GAMING CORPORATION

Per:
    -----------------------
Name:    Lawrence Cofield
Title: Director

ASANOL MANAGEMENT CORPORATION

Per:
    -----------------------
Name: Sergei Nitsenko
Title:

eBANX.COM (ISLE OF MAN) LTD

Per:
    -----------------------
Name: David Harris
Title: Director
KENNETH THOMPSON,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

__________________________/

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D15-5443

Opinion filed March 11, 2016.

Petition for Belated Appeal -- Original Jurisdiction.

W. Charles Fletcher, Jacksonville, for Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Trisha Meggs Pate, Bureau Chief, and Jillian 

H. Reding, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition seeking a belated appeal of the judgment and sentence rendered 

on October 29, 2015, in Duval County Circuit Court case number 2012-CF-11144, 

is granted. Upon issuance of mandate, a copy of this opinion shall be furnished to 

the clerk of the lower tribunal for treatment as a notice of appeal. 

THOMAS, BILBREY, and KELSEY, JJ., CONCUR.
United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

November 15, 2021 

Before

 DIANE S. SYKES, Chief Judge

 DIANE P. WOOD, Circuit Judge

 DAVID F. HAMILTON, Circuit Judge

No. 20-2243 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and 

the STATE OF ILLINOIS ex rel.

THOMAS PROSE, 

Plaintiffs-Appellants, 

v. 

MOLINA HEALTHCARE OF 

ILLINOIS, INC. and MOLINA 

HEALTHCARE, INC., 

 Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District 

Court for the Northern District of Illinois, 

Eastern Division. 

No. 17 C 6638 

Virginia M. Kendall, 

Judge. 

O R D E R

Defendants-Appellees filed a petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc on

September 2, 2021. All judges on the original panel have voted to deny rehearing and a 

majority of judges in active service have voted to deny rehearing en banc, with the 

following amendments to the opinion: 

On page 14 of the Slip Opinion, the first full paragraph is amended to remove: 

“and so Molina is mistaken when it suggests that the implied version requires 

express representations about the goods or services to be provided. Material 

omissions can suffice.” The final sentence of the amended paragraph now reads: 

“Implied and express statements raise distinct issues, however.”
No. 20-2243 Page 2 

On page 15 of the Slip Opinion, the final sentence of the carryover paragraph is 

amended to read: “The complaint must include specific allegations that show 

that the omission in context significantly affected the government’s actions.” 

On page 29 of the Slip Opinion (Dissent of Chief Judge Sykes), the first 

paragraph after “C. Implied False Certification” is amended to remove: “That is, 

the majority simply states, without explanation, that material omissions are 

implied false certifications. Majority op. at 14 (‘Material omissions can suffice.’)” 

In the same paragraph, the final sentence is amended to read: “That approach 

cannot be squared with Escobar’s requirements for this type of FCA claim.”

IT IS HERBY ORDERED that the petition for panel rehearing and rehearing en 

banc is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this court’s opinion dated November 15, 2021, is 

amended as indicated in this order in a separately filed opinion released on today’s 

date.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 217 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 217

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 25, 2007

                                Received

                           September 27, 2007

  Referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
  To correct technical errors in the enrollment of the bill H.R. 3580.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That, in the enrollment of the bill H.R. 3580, the Clerk of the House 
shall make the following corrections:
            (1) In subparagraph (I) of section 402(j)(3) of the Public 
        Health Service Act, as inserted by section 801(a)(2) of the 
        bill:
                    (A) In clause (i) of such subparagraph (I), strike 
                ``drugs described in subparagraph (C)'' and insert 
                ``drugs and devices described in subparagraph (C)''.
                    (B) In clause (iii) of such subparagraph (I), 
                strike ``drugs described in subparagraph (C)'' and 
                insert ``drugs and devices described in subparagraph 
                (C)''.
            (2) In subparagraph (A) of section 505(q)(1) of the Federal 
        Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, as added by section 914(a) of the 
        bill, add at the end the following:
                ``Consideration of the petition shall be separate and 
                apart from review and approval of any application.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 25, 2007.

            Attest:

                                            LORRAINE C. MILLER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Exhibit 32

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

            Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
      (subsection (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United
      States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Canal Capital
      Corporation and Subsidiaries, a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), does
      hereby certify that:

      The Quarterly Report of Form 10-Q for the three months ended January 31,
      2007 (the "Form 10-Q") of the Company fully complies with the requirements
      of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
      information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.


Date: March 13, 2007                  /S/ Michael E. Schultz
                                      -----------------------
                                      Chief Executive Officer


Date: March 13, 2007                  /S/ Reginald Schauder
                                      -----------------------
                                      Chief Financial Officer


                                       44
### Surface water supply of the United States, 1927, Part IV, St. Lawrence River basin

By: Water Resources Division, U.S. Geological Survey

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp644

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.27


                                 SALE OF RIGHTS

EFFECTIVE AS OF JULY 8, 1999

BETWEEN:  CYBEROAD GAMING CORPORATION, a St. Kitts, West Indies corporation
("Cyberoad").

AND

BETWEEN:  EBANX.COM(ISLE OF MAN) LIMITED, an Isle of Man corporation
("eBanx.com")

WHEREAS, both parties to the agreement acknowledge that 100% of all rights of
ownership of the following:

     1.   eBanx.com trademark;
     2.   domain name;
     3.   intellectual property, including eBanx systems (software); and
     4.   eBanx operations including assets and liabilities;

are hereby transferred in full to Ebanx.com (Isle of Man) Limited in
consideration for $50,000 U.S. and other consideration hereby acknowledged as
being received.

THIS AGREEMENT may be signed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be
deemed an original, and all of which shall constitute one and the same
agreement.

ACKNOWLEDGED this 8th day July, 1999 by:

CYBEROAD GAMING CORPORATION             EBANX.COM (IOM) LIMITED


/s/ LAWRENCE COFIELD                    /s/ DAVID HARRIS
-----------------------------           -----------------------------
Lawrence Cofield,                       David Harris,
Director                                Director
|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  November 4, 2009 | /s/ MICHAEL E. BATTEN                |
|-----------------------------------|--------------------------------------|
|                              | Michael E. Batten                    |
|                              | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |

----
Proposed Revisions to Pennsylvania’s State Implementation

Plan

j38 Pa.B. 1216]

[Saturday, March 8, 20081

Section 110 ofthe Federal Clean Air Act (CAA) requires states to

develop State Implementation Plans (SIP) and programs to meet the

National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) established by the

United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to protect public

health and welfare. Section 110 ofthe CAA sets forth general elements for

the implementation of SIPs. Section 11 0(a)(2) ofthe CAA requires statesto submit SIP revisions to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)Administrator that provide for implementation, maintenance and

enforcement ofthe NAAQS.

The Department ofEnvironmental Protection (Department) is seeking

comment on a SIP revision that confirms the Commonwealth’s compliance

with section 1 10(a)(2)(K) ofthe CAA for fine PM2.5 Section 1 10(a)(2)(K)

requires a state’s SIP to provide for the performance of air qualitymodeling as EPA may prescribe to predict the effect on ambient air quality

of emissions of air pollutants for which a NAAQS has been established.The SIP revision identifies the Commonwealth’s legal authority and

obligation to attain the PM2.5NAAQS and to perform the modeling, and

describes the process the Department is using to prepare and submitmodeling for PM2.5,including its work with a cooperative regional

consortium.

The proposed SIP revision is available on the Department’s web site at

www.depweb.state.pa.us (choose Air Plans) or through the contact persons

listed. The Department will hold a public hearing to receive comments on

the proposals on Thursday, April 10, 2008, at 1 p.m. at the Department’s

Southcentral Regional Office, 909 Elmerton Avenue, Susquehanna Room

A, Harrisburg, PA 17110.

Persons wishing to present testimony at the hearing on the proposed SIP

revisions should contact Yvette House, P. 0. Box 8468, Harrisburg, PA

17105, (717) 787-9495, yhouse@state.pa.us to reserve a time. Persons
8

9

95. 

y 

y 

(

) 

5984 to discuss how the Department can best accommodate their needs.

The Department must receive comments no later than April 10, 2008.

Written comments should be sent to the attention of Arleen Shulman,

Division of Air Resource Management, Bureau of Air Quality, P. 0. Box

8468, Harrisburg, PA 17105-8468, ashulman@state.pa.us

KATHLEEN A. MCGINTY,

Secretary

[Pa.B. Doc. No. 08-402. Filed for public inspection March 7, 2008,9:00 a.m.j

No part ofthe information on this site may be reproduced for profit or sold

for profit.

This material has been drawn directly from the official Pennsylvania

Bulletin full text database. Due to the limitations ofHTML or differences

in display capabilities of different browsers, this version may differslightly from the official printed version.

webnza:; aPaBu1letin. coin
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 09-6407

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

 v. 

DENNIS KEITH, 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, 

District Judge. (5:04-cr-00126-BO-1) 

Submitted: August 20, 2009 Decided: October 6, 2009 

Before NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Dennis Keith, Appellant Pro Se. Anne Margaret Hayes, Rudolf A. 

Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorneys, Raleigh, North 

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

Dennis Keith appeals the district court’s order 

denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for reduction 

of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible 

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the 

district court. United States v. Keith, No. 5:04-cr-00126-BO-1 

(E.D.N.C. Feb. 24, 2009). We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
Before the First Division,

March 17, 1943

No. 48104.

#### Protest 23726-K of Westergaard, Berg-Johnsen Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Cole, J.

The only testimony produced was that of the warehouse foreman of the plaintiff-corporation, who identified a sample of the merchandise which was received in evidence as collective exhibit 1, and which bears the label “Cod-Roe-Caviar — -Paste,” and testified that it consists of the roe of codfish mixed with rice, flour, and spices. A report of the qualitative and quantitative analysis of the merchandise (exhibit 2) revealed nothing germane to the issue presented herein. The meagre record was found not sufficient to support the burden upon the plaintiff. The protest was therefore overruled and the decision of the collector affirmed.
Termination Letter


Termination Letter

 

This termination letter dated this 21* day of February 2022 officially terminates the acquisition of shares of Zyppah, Inc owned by Jonathan Greenburg (the “Shareholder”) that were pending acquisition by Kronos Advanced Technologies Inc (the “Issuer”) which hereby also cancels the following shares and requires the return to the Issuer’s treasury of 90,000,000 (ninety Million) shares of the Common Stock issued as follows: two stock certificate of 45,000,000 each issued as of 09-30-2021 (the “Shares”) issued to, but not yet delivered to, Jonathan Greenburg.

 

Jonathan Greenburg as a result of the above will not transfer or delver shares of Zyppah, Inc to Kronos Advanced Technologies, Inc. and Kronos is no longer entitled to ownership of said Zyppah, Inc. shares.

 

The Shareholder is the sole holder of record of the Kronos Shares, but never became the beneficial owner of those Shares, which are free and clear of all Liens, and there exists no restriction on the transfer of the Shares back to the Company. Upon execution hereof, Stockholder herby delivers and relinquishes to the Company good and marketable title to the Shares free and clear of all Liens.

 

Let this letter serve as authorization to Worldwide Stock Transfer, Inc. (the “Transfer Agent”), to cancel and return to the authorized capital the above referenced Kronos shares upon execution hereof. The Company (Kronos) shall deliver to the Transfer Agent the certificates representing the Shares for cancellation, duly executed for cancellation and accompanied with or without stock powers duly executed.

 

  

/s/ Jonathan Greenburg

Jonathan Greenburg

Shareholder of record of KNOS

 

/s/ Michael Rubinov

Michael Rubinov

President, Kronos Advanced Technologies, Inc.
No. 44259.

#### Protests 942580-G (A), etc., of Stickney & Poor Spice Co. et al. (Boston).

Opinion by

Evans, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of ginger root similar to that passed upon in *Wilson*v. *United States*(28 C. C. P. A. —, C. A. D. 126). The claim for free entry under paragraph 1768 was therefore sustained.