2858 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 14 / Tuesday, January 23, 2007 / Notices 

Than Fair Value and Antidumping Duty 

Order: Certain Frozen Warmwater 

Shrimp From the Socialist Republic of 

Vietnam, 70 FR 5152 (Feb. 1, 2005) 

(Amended Shrimp Finals/Orders). In the 

Amended Shrimp Finals/Orders, the 

Department noted that the scope of the 

antidumping duty orders had been 

amended to exclude canned warmwater 

shrimp and prawns to reflect the 

International Trade Commission’s 

finding that a domestic industry in the 

United States is not materially injured 

or threatened with material injury by 

reason of imports of canned warmwater 

shrimp and prawns from the countries 

in question. 

Subsequent to the issuance of the 

shrimp orders, we noticed that the first 

sentence of the first paragraph of the 

scope language of each order might 

suggest that the warmwater shrimp 

subject to the order includes warmwater 

shrimp in non–frozen form. Therefore, 

we are amending the scope language of 

the orders by moving the word ‘‘frozen’’

to be before ‘‘warmwater shrimp and 

prawns’’ in the first sentence of the first 

paragraph of the scope of each order to 

clarify that only frozen warmwater 

shrimp and prawns are subject to the 

order. As a result, the first paragraph of 

the scope of each order reads as follows: 

The scope of this order includes 

certain frozen warmwater shrimp and 

prawns, whether wild–caught (ocean 

harvested) or farm–raised (produced by 

aquaculture), head–on or head–off, 

shell–on or peeled, tail–on or tail–off, 

deveined or not deveined, cooked or 

raw, or otherwise processed in frozen 

form. 

We are thus amending the 

antidumping duty orders of certain 

frozen warmwater shrimp from Brazil, 

Ecuador, India, Thailand, the People’s 

Republic of China and the Socialist 

Republic of Vietnam, as noted above. 

These amended orders are issued and 

published in accordance with section 

736(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended. 

Dated: January 16, 2007. 

Stephen J. Claeys, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. E7–931 Filed 1–22–03; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

(A–351–825, A–533–810, A–588–833, A–469–

805) 

Stainless Steel Bar from Brazil, India, 

Japan, and Spain: Continuation of 

Antidumping Duty Orders 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: As a result of the 

determinations by the Department of 

Commerce (the Department) and the 

International Trade Commission (ITC) 

that revocation of the antidumping duty 

orders on stainless steel bar from Brazil, 

India, Japan, and Spain would be likely 

to lead to continuation or recurrence of 

dumping and of material injury to an 

industry in the United States within a 

reasonably foreseeable time, the 

Department is publishing notice of the 

continuation of these antidumping duty 

orders. 

EFFECTIVE DATE: January 23, 2007. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Kristin Case or Minoo Hatten, Office 5, 

AD/CVD Operations, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street & Constitution 

Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–3174 and (202) 

482–1690, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On March 1, 2006, the Department 

initiated the second sunset reviews of 

the antidumping duty orders on 

stainless steel bar (SSB) from Brazil, 

India, Japan, and Spain pursuant to 

section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, 

as amended (the Act). See Initiation of 

Five–Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Reviews, 71 FR 

10476 (March 1, 2006). 

As a result of our review, we found 

that revocation of the antidumping duty 

orders would be likely to lead to 

continuation or recurrence of dumping 

and we notified the ITC of the 

magnitude of the margins likely to 

prevail were the orders to be revoked. 

See Stainless Steel Bar from Brazil, 

India, Japan, and Spain; Final Results of 

the Expedited Sunset Reviews of the 

Antidumping Duty Orders, 71 FR 38372 

(July 6, 2006). On December 4, 2006, the 

ITC determined, pursuant to section 

751(c) of the Act, that revocation of the 

antidumping duty orders on SSB from 

Brazil, India, Japan, and Spain would be 

likely to lead to continuation or 

recurrence of material injury to an 

industry in the United States within a 

reasonably foreseeable time. See 

Stainless Steel Bar From Brazil, India, 

Japan, and Spain, 72 FR 1243 (January 

10, 2007), and ITC Publication 3895 

(January 2007) entitled Stainless Steel 

Bar from Brazil, India, Japan, and 

Spain: Investigation Nos. 731–TA–678, 

679, 681 and 682 (Second Review). 

Scope of the Orders 

Imports covered by these orders are 

shipments of SSB. SSB means articles of 

stainless steel in straight lengths that 

have been either hot–rolled, forged, 

turned, cold–drawn, cold–rolled or 

otherwise cold–finished, or ground, 

having a uniform solid cross section 

along their whole length in the shape of 

circles, segments of circles, ovals, 

rectangles (including squares), triangles, 

hexagons, octagons, or other convex 

polygons. SSB includes cold–finished 

SSBs that are turned or ground in 

straight lengths, whether produced from 

hot–rolled bar or from straightened and 

cut rod or wire, and reinforcing bars that 

have indentations, ribs, grooves, or 

other deformations produced during the 

rolling process. 

Except as specified above, the term 

does not include stainless steel semi–

finished products, cut length flat–rolled 

products (i.e., cut length rolled products 

which if less than 4.75 mm in thickness 

have a width measuring at least 10 times 

the thickness, or if 4.75 mm or more in 

thickness having a width which exceeds 

150 mm and measures at least twice the 

thickness), wire (i.e., cold–formed 

products in coils, of any uniform solid 

cross section along their whole length, 

which do not conform to the definition 

of flat–rolled products), and angles, 

shapes, and sections. 

The SSB subject to these orders is 

currently classifiable under subheadings 

7222.11.00.05, 7222.11.00.50, 

7222.19.00.05, 7222.19.00.50, 

7222.20.00.05, 7222.20.00.45, 

7222.20.00.75, and 7222.30.00.00 of the 

Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 

United States (HTSUS). Although the 

HTSUS subheadings are provided for 

convenience and customs purposes, our 

written description of the scope of these 

orders is dispositive. 

Determination 

As a result of the determinations by 

the Department and ITC that revocation 

of these antidumping duty orders would 

be likely to lead to continuation or 

recurrence of dumping and material 

injury to an industry in the United 

States, pursuant to section 751(d)(2) of 

the Act, the Department hereby orders 

the continuation of the antidumping 

duty orders on stainless steel bar from 

Brazil, India, Japan, and Spain. 

mstockstill on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 14 / Tuesday, January 23, 2007 / Notices 2859 

1The Sansico Group claimed it had no shipments 

of subject merchandise during the POR in a 

submission dated May 22, 2006. 

U.S. Customs and Border Protection 

will continue to collect antidumping 

duty cash deposits at the rates in effect 

at the time of entry for all imports of 

subject merchandise. 

The effective date of continuation of 

these orders will be the date of 

publication in the Federal Register of 

this Notice of Continuation. Pursuant to 

section 751(c) of the Act, the 

Department intends to initiate the next 

five–year reviews of these orders not 

later than January 2012. 

This notice is in accordance with 

sections 751(c) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. 

Dated: January 16, 2007. 

David M. Spooner, 

Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. E7–862 Filed 1–22–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

A–580–844 

Notice of Extension of Time Limit for 

Final Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review: Steel Concrete 

Reinforcing Bars from the Republic of 

Korea 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

EFFECTIVE DATE: January 23, 2007. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Terre Keaton Stefanova or Katherine 

Johnson, AD/CVD Operations, Office 2, 

Import Administration, International 

Trade Administration, U.S. Department 

of Commerce, 14th Street and 

Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–1280 or 

202–482–4929, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On October 10, 2006, the Department 

of Commerce (the Department) 

published in the Federal Register the 

preliminary results of the 2004 - 2005 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on steel 

concrete reinforcing bars from the 

Republic of Korea. See Steel Concrete 

Reinforcing Bar From The Republic of 

Korea: Notice of Preliminary Results 

and Preliminary Rescission, in Part, of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review, 71 FR 59440 (October 10, 2006). 

The final results for this administrative 

review are currently due no later than 

February 7, 2007. 

Extension of Time Limits for Final 

Results of Review 

Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act 

of 1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’), 

requires the Department to issue the 

final results of the review of an 

antidumping duty order within 120 

days after the date on which the 

preliminary results are published in the 

Federal Register. However, if it is not 

practicable to complete the review 

within this time period, section 

751(a)(3)(A) of the Act allows the 

Department to extend the time limit for 

the final results to 180 days from the 

date of publication of the preliminary 

results. 

The Department finds that it is not 

practicable to complete the final results 

of this review within the original time 

limit. Due to the complexity of the issue 

raised by the petitioners in its case brief 

regarding the respondents’ reporting of 

yield strength, a model–match 

characteristic, the Department requires 

additional time to properly analyze this 

issue. Therefore, we are fully extending 

the deadline for the final results of this 

review until no later than April 9, 2007, 

the next business day after 180 days 

from publication of the preliminary 

results, in accordance with section 

751(a)(3)(A) of the Act. 

We are issuing and publishing this 

notice in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1), 751(a)(3)(A), and 777(i)(1) of 

the Act. 

Dated: January 17, 2007. 

Stephen J. Claeys, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. E7–930 Filed 1–22–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

A–570–894 

Certain Tissue Paper Products from 

the People’s Republic of China: 

Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary 

Results of the First Administrative 

Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

EFFECTIVE DATE: January 23, 2007. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Kristina Horgan or Bobby Wong, AD/ 

CVD Operations, Office 9, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–8173, or (202) 

482–0409, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On April 28, 2006, the Department of 

Commerce (the Department) initiated an 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on certain 

tissue paper from the People’s Republic 

of China (PRC) for the period September 

21, 2004, to February 28, 2006. 

Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative 

Reviews, 71 FR 25145 (April 28, 2006). 

On October 24, 2006, in accordance 

with section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), and 

19 CFR 351.213(h)(2), the Department 

extended the deadline for the 

preliminary results of review until 

February 16, 2007. See Certain Tissue 

Paper Products from the People’s 

Republic of China: Extension of Time 

Limit for Preliminary Results of the First 

Administrative Review, 71 FR 62249 

(October 24, 2006). 

On November 6, 2006, the Department 

reopened the record of the instant 

review to allow interested parties to 

submit new factual information. See 

‘‘Letter To All Interested Parties from 

James C. Doyle RE: First Administrative 

Review of Certain Tissue Paper Products 

from the People’s Republic of China,’’

dated November 6, 2006. On December 

22, 2006, the petitioner submitted a 

revised, final bracketed version of its 

timely filed November 13, 2006 

submission, which contained comments 

regarding the Sansico Group’s claim of 

no shipments.1 On January 3, 2007, the 

Sansico Group timely filed comments 

addressing the petitioner’s December 22, 

2006, submission. 

Extension of Time Limits for 

Preliminary Results 

Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act, and 19 

CFR 351.213(h)(1) require the 

Department to issue the preliminary 

results of an administrative review 

within 245 days after the last day of the 

anniversary month of the order for 

which the administrative review was 

requested, and the final results of the 

review within 120 days after the date on 

which the notice of the preliminary 

results was published in the Federal 

Register. However, if the Department 

determines that it is not practicable to 

complete the review within this time 

period, section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act 

and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(2) allow the 

Department to extend the 245-day 

mstockstill on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES