alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Employment Outlook for Technicians: A Report on Draftsmen, Engineering Aids, Laboratory Technicians, and Electronic Technicians

              																	United States. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 						*Employment Outlook for Technicians: A Report on Draftsmen, Engineering Aids, Laboratory Technicians, and Electronic Technicians : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 1131*,												Washington: 								U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 										1953,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/4456,			accessed on September 25, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
### Reconnaissance of the geology and ground-water resources of the Pass Creek Flats area, Carbon County, Wyoming, with a section on the chemical quality of the water

By: F. N. VisherW. H. Durum

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/cir188

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

No abstract available.

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
Exhibit 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

                PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
         OF 2002 (SUBSECTIONS (A) AND (B) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF
                          TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)


Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), the
undersigned officer of SonomaWest Holdings, Inc., a California corporation (the
"Company"), does hereby certify that: The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended December 31, 2003 (the "Form 10-Q") of the Company fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Form
10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.


                                     Dated: February 12, 2004

                                     /s/ Roger S. Mertz
                                     ---------------------
                                     Roger S. Mertz
                                     Chairman of the Board


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to SonomaWest Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by SonomaWest
Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.



                                       -1-
**EXHIBIT 21****SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT**US LEC of North Carolina Inc. (North Carolina Corporation)US LEC of Georgia Inc. (Delaware Corporation)US LEC of Tennessee Inc. (Delaware Corporation)US LEC of Florida Inc. (North Carolina Corporation)US LEC of South Carolina Inc. (Delaware Corporation)US LEC of Alabama Inc. (North Carolina Corporation)US LEC of Maryland Inc. (North Carolina Corporation)US LEC of Pennsylvania Inc. (North Carolina Corporation)US LEC Communications Inc. (North Carolina Corporation)US LEC of Virginia L.L.C. (Delaware Limited Liability Company)US LECiTel, L.L.C. (North Carolina Limited Liability Company)US LEC of New York Inc. (North Carolina Corporation)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-01-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          63,623
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   17,656
<ALLOWANCES>                                       366
<INVENTORY>                                     13,735
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               103,357
<PP&E>                                         140,237
<DEPRECIATION>                                  65,109
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 185,182
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           20,155
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           245
<OTHER-SE>                                     161,618
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   185,182
<SALES>                                         57,724
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                57,724
<CGS>                                           33,422
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   33,422
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,822
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,209
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                613
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       613
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .02
        

</TABLE>
H. Con. Res. 306 Agreed to March 11, 2008 

One Hundred Tenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and eight 

Concurrent Resolution 

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 

SECTION 1. USE OF ROTUNDA FOR HOLOCAUST DAYS OF REMEMBRANCE CEREMONY. 

The Rotunda of the Capitol is authorized to be used on May 

1, 2008, for a ceremony as part of the commemoration of the 

days of remembrance of victims of the Holocaust. Physical preparations for the ceremony shall be carried out in accordance with 

such conditions as the Architect of the Capitol may prescribe. 

Attest: 

Clerk of the House of Representatives. 

Attest: 

Secretary of the Senate.
#### Robert FITZPATRICK, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Respondent.

No. 05-3232.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Aug. 5, 2005.

ORDER

Petitioner having paid the initial docketing fee, and filed the required 15(c) Discrimination Statement, it is,

ORDERED that the order of dismissal and the mandate be, and the same hereby are, VACATED and RECALLED, and the petition for review is REINSTATED.

Petitioner’s brief is due within 55 days from the date of filing of this order.
III 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 485 

To express the sense of the Senate concerning the value of family planning 

for American women. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 22, 2006 

Mrs. CLINTON (for herself, Ms. CANTWELL, Mr. MENENDEZ, Mr. KERRY, Mr. 

LAUTENBERG, Mrs. MURRAY, Mr. KENNEDY, Mr. SCHUMER, Mrs. 

BOXER, Mr. HARKIN, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, and Ms. LANDRIEU) submitted 

the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Health, 

Education, Labor, and Pensions 

RESOLUTION 

To express the sense of the Senate concerning the value 

of family planning for American women. 

Whereas the United States has one of the highest rates of 

abortion in the industrialized world; 

Whereas reducing unintended pregnancies will reduce the 

number of abortions; 

Whereas one of the most effective ways to prevent unintended 

pregnancy is to improve access to safe, affordable, effective family planning; 

Whereas contraceptive use has declined (slightly among all 

women and precipitously among low-income women) and, 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 485 IS

as a result, unplanned pregnancy rates have risen among 

low-income women by 30 percent; 

Whereas the impact of contraceptive use is hard to overstate—11 percent of women in the United States who do 

not use contraception account for 1⁄2 of all unintended 

pregnancies; 

Whereas low-income women today are 4 times as likely to 

have an unintended pregnancy and more than 4 times as 

likely to have an abortion as higher-income women; 

Whereas abortion rates have increased among low-income 

women, even as they have continued to decrease among 

more affluent women; 

Whereas 12,800,000 women of reproductive age are uninsured and 9,300,000 women of reproductive age live in 

poverty; 

Whereas lack of coverage for contraception and other health 

care costs result in women of reproductive age paying 68 

percent more in out-of-pocket costs for health care services than do men of the same age; 

Whereas family planning is a vital part of helping women 

achieve the best health outcomes for both women and 

their babies; and 

Whereas Women’s Health Week is a time to recognize the 

important role family planning services play in the lives 

of women across the United States: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that— 

2 (1) Congress should help women, regardless of 

3 income, avoid unintended pregnancy and abortion 

4 through access to affordable contraception; and 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
3 

•SRES 485 IS

1 (2) Congress should support programs and poli2 cies that make it easier for women to obtain contra3 ceptives. 

Æ 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
#### American Shipping Co. et al. *v.*United States

No. 6773.

Entry No. 755032, etc.

Invoices dated Birmingham, England, April 30, 1942, etc.

Certified May 1, 1942, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., June 17, 1942, etc.

(Decided January 17, 1947)

*Strauss & Hedges (Eugene F. Blauvelt*of counsel) for the plaintiffs.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Lawrence, Judge:

It has been agreed between the parties hereto that the issues herein relating to the above-mentioned merchandise are the same in all material respects as those decided in *United States*v. *Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp.,*33 C. C. P. A. (Customs) 183, C. A. D. 334, and that the record therein may be incorporated herein.

Upon the agreed facts I find the export value, as defined in section 402 (d), Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for determining the value of said merchandise, and that such values are the appraised values, less additions made by importer on entries because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1999
<CASH>                                          17,211
<SECURITIES>                                   220,373
<RECEIVABLES>                                  227,466
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    500,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,118,185
<PP&E>                                       7,532,286
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,728,382
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,163,866
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,204,541
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     34,117
<COMMON>                                        53,138
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,869,257
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,163,866
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               733,589
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  448,740
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               262,526
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             168,475
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (140,178)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (140,178)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               (57,802)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (197,980)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.06)
        

</TABLE>
EX-31 Rule13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications.

 

 

I, Leah Nivison,certify that:

 

1. I have reviewedthis report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed inrespect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of the GS MortgageSecurities Trust 2016-GS2 (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

 

2. Based on myknowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3. Based on myknowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required tobe provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is includedin the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4. Based on myknowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report underItem 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Actperiodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under theservicing agreements in all material respects; and

 

5. All of the reportson assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securitiesand their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance withservicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in thisreport in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except asotherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliancedescribed in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving thecertifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me bythe following unaffiliated parties:

 

Midland LoanServices, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer,Torchlight Loan Services, LLC, as Special Servicer, LNR Partners, LLC, asSpecial Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee andCertificate Administrator, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, asCustodian, Pentalpha Surveillance LLC, as Operating Advisor, Wells Fargo Bank,National Association, as Primary Servicer for the Veritas Multifamily Pool 1Mortgage Loan, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Special Servicer forthe Veritas Multifamily Pool 1 Mortgage Loan, Wilmington Trust, NationalAssociation, as Trustee for the Veritas Multifamily Pool 1 Mortgage Loan, WellsFargo Bank, National Association, as Custodian for the Veritas Multifamily Pool1 Mortgage Loan, CoreLogic Commercial Real Estate Services, Inc., as ServicingFunction Participant for the Veritas Multifamily Pool 1 Mortgage Loan, andNational Tax Search, LLC, as Servicing Function Participant for the VeritasMultifamily Pool 1 Mortgage Loan.

 

 

 

Dated: March 19, 2020

 

 

/s/ Leah Nivison

 

 

Chief ExecutiveOfficer

(senior officerin charge of securitization of the depositor)
```

[House Report 110-630]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

110th Congress                                                   Report
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 2d Session                                                     110-630

======================================================================

 
 PROVIDING FOR THE ADOPTION OF THE CONCURRENT RESOLUTION (S. CON. RES. 
   70) SETTING FORTH THE CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET FOR THE UNITED STATES 
GOVERNMENT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2009 AND INCLUDING THE APPROPRIATE BUDGETARY 
           LEVELS FOR FISCAL YEARS 2008 AND 2010 THROUGH 2013

                                _______
                                

May 13, 2008.--Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

                                _______
                                

   Mr. McGovern, from the Committee on Rules, submitted the following

                              R E P O R T

                      [To accompany H. Res. 1190]

    The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration 
House Resolution 1190, by a record vote of 7 to 4, report the 
same to the House with the recommendation that the resolution 
be adopted.

                SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

    The rule provides for the adoption in the House of S. Con. 
Res. 70, the Concurrent Budget Resolution for 2009. The rule 
takes from the Speaker's table S. Con. Res. 70, adopts an 
amendment in the nature of a substitute consisting of the text 
of H. Con. Res. 312 as adopted by the House, adopts S. Con. 
Res. 70 as amended, and provides that the House insists on its 
amendment and requests a conference with the Senate.

                            COMMITTEE VOTES

    The results of each record vote on an amendment or motion 
to report, together with the names of those voting for and 
against, are printed below:

Rules Committee record vote No. 495

    Date: May 13, 2008.
    Measure: H. Res. 1190, providing for the adoption of S. 
Con. Res. 70.
    Motion By: Mr. Dreier.
    Summary of Motion: To add as a new section at the end of 
the resolution as follows: That upon adoption of this 
resolution, H.R. 2642 (FY2008 Military Construction & Veterans 
Affairs Appropriations bill) and H.R. 2638 (FY2008 Homeland 
Security Appropriations bill), and their accompanying papers 
are laid on the table.
    Results: Defeated 4-7.
    Vote by Members: McGovern--Nay; Hastings (FL)--Nay; 
Matsui--Nay; Welch--Nay; Castor--Nay; Arcuri--Nay; Sutton--Nay; 
Dreier--Yea; Diaz-Balart--Yea; Hastings (WA)--Yea; Sessions--
Yea.

Rules Committee record vote No. 496

    Date: May 13, 2008.
    Measure: H. Res. 1190, providing for the adoption of S. 
Con. Res. 70.
    Motion By: Mr. Hastings (FL).
    Summary of Motion: To report the rule.
    Results: Adopted 7-4.
    Vote by Members: McGovern--Yea; Hastings (FL)--Yea; 
Matsui--Yea; Welch--Yea; Castor--Yea; Arcuri--Yea; Sutton--Yea; 
Dreier--Nay; Diaz-Balart--Nay; Hastings (WA)--Nay; Sessions--
Nay.

                                  

```
Exhibit 4(b)(i)



                     GE LIFE AND ANNUITY ASSURANCE COMPANY
                          OPTIONAL DEATH BENEFIT RIDER
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This rider provides for an optional death benefit which is coordinated  with the
Death  Benefit at Death of Any Annuitant  provision in the Contract.  While this
Rider is in effect, the amount payable at the death of any Annuitant will be the
greater of:

     o    The Death Benefit provided for under the Death Provisions section in
          the Contract; or
     o    The minimum death benefit described below.

Minimum Death Benefit
The minimum  death  benefit is the value of  Purchase  Payments  increased  with
interest at 6% per year up to 200% of Purchase Payments.

Withdrawals for each contract year up to 6% of Purchase Payments,  calculated at
the time of the withdrawals, reduce the minimum death benefit by the same amount
that the withdrawal  reduces the Contract Value. If withdrawals  greater than 6%
of Purchase  Payments are made in the current or any prior  contract  year,  the
minimum death benefit will be reduced proportionally by the same percentage that
the withdrawal reduces Contract Value.

Annual Death Benefit Charge
There will be a charge made for this rider for each period it is in effect. This
charge is made in  arrears  at the  beginning  of each  contract  year after the
first,  and at surrender.  The charge is made against the Contract  Value in the
Separate Account. The maximum charge will be the rate shown on the contract data
pages times the Contract Value at the time of deduction.  The actual charge will
never be greater than the maximum annual charge. The charge at surrender will be
a pro rata portion of the annual charge.

If the  Contract  Value in the  Separate  Account is  insufficient  to cover the
annual death  benefit  charge,  then the  deduction  will be made first from the
Contract  Value  in  the  Separate   Account.   This  charge  will  be  deducted
proportionally from the Subaccounts in which you are invested. The excess of the
charges  over the Contract  Value in the Separate  Account will then be deducted
from the Contract Value in the Guarantee Account.  Deductions from the Guarantee
Account will be taken from the amounts which have been in the Guarantee  Account
for the longest period of time.

When this Rider is Effective
This rider becomes  effective on the Contract Date unless another effective date
is shown on the  contract  data  pages.  It will  remain  in effect  while  this
Contract is in force and before  Income  Payments  begin,  or until the contract
anniversary  following  the date of receipt of your  request  to  terminate  the
rider. If your request is received  within 30 days of any contract  anniversary,
you may request that the rider terminate as of that anniversary.

For GE Life and Annuity Assurance Company,


                                        /s/ Pamela S. Schutz
                                        ----------------------
                                            Pamela S. Schutz
                                            President