alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1
 
 
 
 Certification of CEO Pursuant to
 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
 As Adopted Pursuant to
 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of U.S. Energy Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Keith G. Larsen Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:
 
 (1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 
 
 
 /s/ Keith G. LarsenKeith G. Larsen,Chief Executive OfficerMay 10, 2010
 
 
 This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
 
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to U.S. Energy Corp. and will be retained by U.S. Energy Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------


                         CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906
                                     OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Unico American
Corporation (the "Company") for the period ended June 30, 2006, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Erwin Cheldin,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
    the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



                    /s/  Erwin Cheldin
                    ------------------
           Name:    Erwin Cheldin
           Title:   Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer
           Date:    August 11, 2006




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Unico American Corporation, and
will be retained by Unico American Corporation, and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
## Befor e th e Unite d State s Departmen to fTransportatio n Washington , D C IVIarch 19 , 201 2

Essentia l Ai rServic e at : McCook , Nebrask a unde r4 9 U.S.C

. 4173 1 et.seq

. 

### fi ) ( O



### > * c 5 —-00-

- r- ^ 

## o~-5- ^ -v-jC_>;=

- 

### rH^?=! ^ £!i~H— ' 

# o9 M

Docke tOST-1997-300 5

Thi s documen tcontain s tin e respons e o fGrea tLake s Aviation , Ltd

. t o Orde rRequestin g Proposal s 2012-1-28

. Grea tLake s Aviation , Ltd

. i s please d t o submi tthi s proposa l t o provid e essentia l ai r transportatio n t o McCook , Nebraska

. W e hav e mor e tha n 2 5 year s o fhistor yo fprovidin g reliabl e Essentia l Ai rService

. Grea tLakes ' proposa l contemplate s non-stop , convenientl ytime d connectin g service s t o ou rcode
- shar e partner s Unite d Airline s an d Frontie rAirline s a tou rDenve rHub

. I n addition

. Grea tLake s maintain s interlin e ticketin g an d baggag e agreement s wit h th e majorit yo fth e othe rcarrier s servin g Denver , includin g interlin e e-ticketin g agreement s wit h America n Airlines , Delt a Airlines , Frontie rAirlines , Unite d Airline s an d U.S

. Airways

. Al l o fwhic h wil l offe rth e McCoo k passenge r maxiu m acces s t o th e domesti can d internationa l ai rtransportatio n system

.
Th e proposa l contemplate s th e us e o fpressurize d 1 9 sea tBeec h 1900 D aircraft ; whic h w e hav e a lon g histor

yo foperating

. Questions an d comment s may-b e referre d to : Michae l Matthew s Chie fFinancia l Office r Grea tLake s Airline s 102 2 AirportParkwa y Cheyenne , WY8200 1 (307 ) 432-703 0

# Grea tLake s Aviation , Ltd

. Annua l Compensatio n Requirement s fo rEssentia l Ai rServic e a t 

## McCook , Nebrask a t o Denve r(DEN )

Tw o Roun d Trip s - B190 0 98.0 % completio n facto r Departures : Bloc k Hours : Revenu e Passenge rMiles : Availabl e Sea tMiles : 1,22 7 1,22 7 872,00 0 5,082,23 4 Operatin g Revenues :

Passenger : MCK-DE N 4,00 0 psgr s a t $92.1 0 $368,40 0
Other : (a t0.62 % o fpassenge rrevenue ) Tota l Operatin g Revenues : $2,28 4 $370,68 4 Operatin g Expenses :

Direct : Aircraf t an d Hul l Insuranc e

Fue l an d Oil Flyin g Operation s Maintenanc e Tota l DirectExpenses : Tota l IndirectExpenses : Tota l Operatin g Expenses : Operatin g Los s Profi tElemen t(5.0 % o fTota l Operatin g Expenses ) Annua l Compensatio n Requirement : Representativ e Schedul e [MCK ] McCook , Nebrask a DEPARTURE S $182,85 5 $838,81 2 $214,89 7 $344,46 8

FL T 724 3 724 3 730 9
FL T 730 9 725 0 725 0 DP T

6:5 7 7:3 9 17:4 1 AR R

7:0 0 7:4 2 17:4 4 AR R 1 VA1 C •~" " r \ r \ r \ 1 V EQ P BE 1 BE 1 BE 1 FRE Q

1234 5 6 12345. 7 TO

DE N DE N DE N
FRO M DE N DE N DE N EQ P

BE 1 BE 1 BE 1
DP T 15:3 0 17:3 1 19:1 0 FRE Q

1234 5 6 7 1234 5
AR R 17:3 1 19:3 2 21:1 1 $1,581,03 2

$654,22 7 $2,235,25 9 f31,864.575 ) $111,76 3 $1,976,33 8

N o Uplin e Schedulin g Restriction s

(,v../V^.-l V.'^Hkju., / 

### / ^f^ , 27 ;
EXHIBIT 32.2


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Trinity Learning Corporation (the "Company")
Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Christine R. Larson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date:  November 18, 2004

                                         /S/ Christine R. Larson
                                         -----------------------
                                         Christine R. Larson
                                         Chief Financial Officer



     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
     been provided to Trinity Learning Corporation and will be retained by it
     and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
     request.
#### Crocker, *in*equity, *versus*Smith.

If an intestate have conveyed land, without any consideration, in trust for his own benefit, the administrator is not entitled to a re-conveyance.

The law gives him not a title to the land of his intestate, but merely a right to sell the same, in a prescribed mode and for certain specified purposes.

The plaintiff is administrator of Asa Smith’s estate. The bill sets forth, *that*the intestate was owner of certain real estate, which he conveyed, without any consideration, to the respondent; *that*it was the agreement of the parties that the respondent should hold the same in trust, for the use of the intestate ; and *that*the estate has been represented insolvent. It thereupon prays *that a*re-conveyance may be decreed.

The respondent appears, and, in writing, admits the truth of the allegations contained in the bill.

By the Court.

The bill cannot be maintained. The administrator has no title to the lands of his intestate. At most, he can have only a right to sell. And he can sell only when the court of probate shall decree the sale to be necessary *;*and under many guards, (such as an oath of faithfulness, specified notice and bond to account,) for the safety of the heirs,, creditors, &c. A conveyance by the respondent to the administrator would enable him to sell without furnishing the protections required by law.

Neither would a conveyance to the heirs, constitute the land to be assets of the estate. The case, too, presents other difficulties, quite insurmountable.

But there is no *necessity*for a decree such as is prayed for. The statute, relating to the sale of lands, of which the intestate was disseized, contains ample provisions for the case presented in the bill.

*Bill dismissed.*
Exhibit
32.2
 
 
 
 Certification
of CFO Pursuant to
 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350,
 As
Adopted Pursuant to
 Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of U.S. Energy Corp. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended May 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Robert Scott Lorimer,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:
 
 (1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 
 
 
 
 /s/  Robert
      Scott LorimerRobert
      Scott Lorimer,Chief
      Financial OfficerMay
      9, 2008
 
 
 This
certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.
 
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
U.S. Energy Corp. and will be retained by U.S. Energy Corp. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, October 19, 2020.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, October 19, 2020

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A21A0368. TATTNALL COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT A/K/A TATTNALL COUNTY 

BOARD OF EDUCATION v. JORDAN R. HUERTA.

Upon consideration of the APPELLANT'S motion FOR PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW 

THE APPEAL in the above styled case, it is ordered that the motion the hereby GRANTED, and 

jurisdiction is released back to the trial court upon receipt of this order.
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

No. 19

- 30530 Summary Calendar

**United States of America,**

Plaintiff

— Appellee **,**

versus
**Sabrina Lynn Deville,** also known as **Lynn Deville,** also known

as **Kim Deville,**
Defendant

— Appellant

**.**

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana USDC No. 2:18

- CV

- 4254 USDC No. 2:15

- CR

- 293

- 1

Before **J olly**  **, E lrod**  **,** and **G raves**  **,** Circuit Judges

**. Per Curiam**  **:** * Sabrina Lynn Deville, federal prisoner # 35501

- 034, pleaded guilty, pursuant to a written agreement, to controlled substance offenses. The district court denied Deville’s motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 on the merits

.

* Pursuant to **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED October 6, 2020

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 19-30530 Document: 00515591080 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/06/2020No. 19

- 30530

2 Deville subsequent ly filed a motion to unseal the transcript of her sentencing hearing to pursue § 2255 relief , which the district court construed as a motion for a copy of the transcript at government expense and denied

. Wh ile Deville’s appeal from the denial of her motion for a copy of her sentencing transcript was pending, t his court , in a separate action, dismissed Deville’s appeal from the denial of her § 2255 motion for lack of jurisdiction because her notice of appeal was untimely. The parties’ briefs, filed after that dismissal, address only issues related to the district court’s denial of Deville’s § 2255 motion. The only viable issue in the instant appeal, however, is whether Deville is entitled to a transcript of her sentencing hearing at government expense to pursue § 2255 relief. Given that we dismissed Deville’s appeal from the denial of her § 2255 motion, no effectual relief exists to grant Deville in the instant appeal. Thus, the instant appeal is moot. See Motient Corp. v. Dondero , 529 F.3d 532, 537 (5th Cir. 2008); United States
v. Lares

- Meraz , 452 F.3d 352, 354

- 55 (5th Cir. 2006). Accordingly, Deville’s appeal is **DISMISSED** as moot. Her motion for the appointment of counsel on appeal is **DENIED**

. Case: 19-30530 Document: 00515591080 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/06/2020
(Reap. Dec. 8384)

Entry No. 976882.

#### United States *v.*Barnett Int. Fwdrs., Inc.

(Decided January 12, 1955)

*Warren E. Burger,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Plaintiff not represented by counsel.

Wilson, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation entered into by and between the respective parties hereto:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, subject to the approval of the Court, that the market value or price at the time of exportation of the involved *437merchandise at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale for home consumption to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature, and all other costs, charges, and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition packed ready for shipment to the United States, is as follows:

> 3 motion-picture projector lenses at 110,000 French francs each.

> 1 projector switch at 15,000 French francs each.

> BOTH ITEMS PLUS 1.01% PLUS PACKING.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that there was no higher export value for such or similar merchandise at the time of exportation thereof.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that this case may be submitted for decision on the foregoing stipulation.

On the agreed facts I find the foreign value, as that value is defined in section 402 (c), as amended by section 8 of the Customs Administrative Act of 1938, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values were as follows:

> Three motion-picture projector lenses at 110,000 French francs each.

> One projector switch at 15,000 French francs each.

> Both items plus 1.01% plus packing.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
Order entered January 3 , 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 18

- 00727

- CR

JOHN EDWARD WILLIAMS , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 416t h Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 416

- 83246

- 2017



### O RDER

The State’s second motion for an extension of time to file its brief is GRANTED, and the

State’s tendered brief is hereby ordered filed in the above cause.

/s/ LAN A MYERS PRESIDING JUSTICE
# Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas

May 29, 2019

No. 04

- 19

- 00077

- CV

Maria Jilma URIBE and Jose Carlos Uribe

,

Appellant s

v.

CARRINGTON MORTGAGE SERVICES, LLC , Servicer and Attorney

- in

- Fact for Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Trustee, for Carrington Mortgage Loan Trust, Series 2006

- NC4 Asset Backed Pass Through Certificates, as Assignee and Successor to New Century Mortgage Corporation, Appellee s

From the 73rd Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014

- CI

- 18492 Honorable Renée Yanta, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

The Appellants ’ M otion fo r Extension of Time to F i le Brief is her eby G RANTED . The appellant s ’ brief is due on or before July 8, 2019.

_________________________________ Liz a A. Rodriguez , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 29th day of May, 2019

.

___________________________________ K eith E. H ottle

, Clerk of Court
Case No. 14,653.

#### UNITED STATES v. BROD et al.

[18 Int. Rev. Rec. 164.]

Circuit Court, N. D. New York.

1873.

Partnership — Bonds—Authority of One Partner to Bind — Warehouse Bond.

A partner, acting with assent of his copart-ners. may bind all the members of his firm by a joint and several bond, made by him in firm name, and undei a single seal affixed to firm signature. This is so without reference to section 25. Act March 1, 1823 [3 Stat. 737]: and hence, although warehouse bonds may not be duty bonds, and therefore not covered by that section, yet one entered into by a member of a firm, in the name of the fire» will equally bind his partner in trade.

[This was a suit by tlie United States against M. Brod & Co. and others.]
No. 50686.

#### Protest 33782-K of M. H. Greenebaum, Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of cheese the same in all material respects as that the subject of *Gruyere Cheese Corp.*v. *United States*(7 Cust. Ct. 171, C. D. 562). In accordance therewith the merchandise was held dutiable as claimed.
EXHIBIT 32





CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL AND EXECUTIVE FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT

TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002.



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Formative Growth Corporation, (the Company) for the period ended June 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Joseph Rozelle, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge that:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: October 4, 2011



/s/ Joseph Rozelle

Joseph Rozelle

President

(Principal Executive and Financial Officer)





The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Report pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part of the Report for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated by reference into any filings of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
# Patent

## Title
Contact-free thickness measuring method and device

## Abstract

The various displacements can be directly controlled by the rotation of the gratings R1 and R2 at the time of the selection of the output wave length in a manner to automatically obtain proper corrections for each wave length. One could provide for this, for example, either a mechanical cam connection or an electronic arrangement from a correction mechanism for the angular position of the shaft 18.

## Background
## Claims

1. In a monochromator adapted for the study of RAMAN spectrums having a turntable concave holographic grating with parallel lines and an inlet slot parallel to the lines of the grating for passage of incident light and an outlet slot also parallel to the lines of the grating, for passage of diffracted light, an improvement wherein said inlet and outlet slots are each disposed on opposite sides of a diametral median plane of the grating extending perpendicular to the lines of the grating and passing through the center of the grating, the bisector of the angle formed by two lines connecting the center of each slot to the center of the grating being contained in said diametral plane, the slots being additionally disposed such that the projection of said angle on the diametral plane is .ltoreq. 3.degree. and the projection said angle on a second plane passing through the bisector and perpendicular to the diametral plane is .ltoreq.15.degree..

2. In a monochromator as claimed in claim 1, wherein the projection of said angle on sid second plane is .ltoreq. 3.degree..

3. In a monochromator as claimed in claim 1, wherein said slots are each perpendicualr to the respective lines connecting their center to the center of the grating.

4. A monochromator assembly comprising at last two elementary monochromators as claimed in claim 1 coupled in series and in which the gratings of the elementary monochromators are carried by a common rotatable shaft, and optical means for directing the image of the outlet slot of one elementary monochromator to the inlet slot of the successive monochromator, said optical means comprising planar mirrors and a spherical mirror said spherical mirror extending parallel to the gratings and a second rotatable shaft supporting said spherical mirror for rotation, said second shaft being parallel to said first shaft.

5. A monochromator assembly as claimed in claim 4 further comprising means for linearly displacing said mirrors in the direction of the light rays.

6. A monochromator assembly as claimed in claim 4 comprising means for linearly displacing said spherical mirror in the direction of the light rays.