alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.1

 

**Certification of Periodic Report**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of National Commerce FinancialCorporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Ernest C. Roessler, Chief Executive Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

        (1.) The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2.) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                         |   |   |                                              |
|-------------------------|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------|
| Date: November 13, 2002 |   |   | /s/ ERNEST C.ROESSLER                             |
|                         |        |        |                                                   |
|                    |   |   | **Ernest C. Roessler****Chief Executive Officer** |
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 278 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 6, 2008 

Received and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Supporting Taiwan’s fourth direct and democratic 

presidential elections in March 2008. 

Whereas the United States and Taiwan share common ideals 

and a clear vision for the 21st century, where freedom 

and democracy are the foundations for peace, prosperity, 

and progress; 

Whereas Taiwan has dramatically improved its record on 

human rights and routinely holds free and fair elections 

in a multiparty system, as evidenced by 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

HCON 278 RFS 

Taiwan’s first democratic presidential election in 1996, 

second in 2000, and third in 2004; 

Whereas the democratic and open presidential elections in 

2000 mark the first transfer of power from one party to 

another in Taiwan’s history; 

Whereas Taiwan has demonstrated its unequivocal support 

for human rights and a commitment to the democratic 

ideals of freedom of speech, freedom of the press, rule of 

law, and free and fair elections routinely held in a 

multiparty system; 

Whereas Taiwan is one of the strongest democratic allies of 

the United States in the Asia-Pacific region; 

Whereas it is United States policy to support and strengthen 

democracy around the world; 

Whereas, with its stable democratic system and impressive 

economic prowess, Taiwan stands apart from many 

equally young democracies whose freedom and liberty 

have been severely challenged; and 

Whereas the United States Congress has organized congressional delegations to witness the electoral process in 

thriving democracies, including elections in Taiwan: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that— 

3 (1) the United States Government should reaf4 firm its unwavering commitment to Taiwan’s democ5 racy and security; and 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
3 

HCON 278 RFS 

1 (2) international delegations should be encour2 aged to visit Taiwan for the purpose of witnessing 

3 the presidential elections in March 2008. 

Passed the House of Representatives March 5, 

2008. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 193 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 193

 Recognizing all hunters across the United States for their continued 
                         commitment to safety.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 26, 2007

    Mr. Carney (for himself, Mr. Shuster, Mr. Holden, Mr. Bishop of 
  Georgia, Mr. Boswell, Mr. Boyd of Florida, Mr. Moore of Kansas, Mr. 
 Patrick J. Murphy of Pennsylvania, Mrs. Gillibrand, Mr. Dent, and Mr. 
    Lincoln Davis of Tennessee) submitted the following concurrent 
   resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and 
                           Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
 Recognizing all hunters across the United States for their continued 
                         commitment to safety.

Whereas in 2006 there were over 16,000,000 hunters in the United States of which 
        only .0013 percent incurred an injury during the past hunting season;
Whereas in 2006 this injury rate was lower than many other forms of recreation;
Whereas there are 70,000 hunter education instructors teaching hunter safety, 
        ethics, and conservation to approximately 750,000 students successfully 
        each year;
Whereas State fish and game agencies began offering hunter safety programs in 
        1949, and since then, more than 35,000,000 people have been certified;
Whereas much of the success of hunter safety can be contributed to hunter 
        education training and the role of responsible hunters in the field;
Whereas Congress commends Pennsylvania hunters for setting a new State safety 
        record in 2006;
Whereas hunters continue year after year to improve their safety record; and
Whereas hunters are the vital link in preserving and maintaining the great 
        natural resources in the United States, including wild places: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),  
That the Congress--
            (1) recognizes all hunters across the United States for 
        their continued commitment to safety; and
            (2) directs the Secretary of the Senate to transmit a copy 
        of this resolution to the Pennsylvania State Game Commissioner 
        and the Director of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT
      31.1




I,
      Walker
      R. Stapleton, certify that:




1. I
      have
      reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of SonomaWest Holdings,
      Inc.;




2. Based
      on
      my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
      fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
      in
      light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
      with respect to the period covered by this report;




3. Based
      on
      my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
      in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
      results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
      periods presented in this report;




4. The
      registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing
      and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange
      Act
      Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:




(a) Designed
      such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
      and
      procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
      information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
      is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
      period in which this report is being prepared;




(b) Evaluated
      the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and
      presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
      disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
      this
      report based on such evaluation;




(c) Disclosed
      in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial
      reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter
      that
      has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
      registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and




5. The
      registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
      recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
      registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
      directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):




(a) All
      significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
      of
      internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
      adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
      report financial information; and




(b) Any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
      who
      have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial
      reporting.






Date:
      May
      15, 2006




/s/
      Walker R. Stapleton


Walker
      R.
      Stapleton, President, Chief


Executive
      Officer and Chief Financial Officer
No. 56688.

protest 178162-K (New York).

#### International Expediters, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

From an examination of the papers in the case the court was unable to find any evidence sufficient to overcome the action of the collector, which was presumptively correct. The protest was therefore overruled.
1

Filed 2/23/ 23 P. v. Girouard CA1/3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or

or dered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

ANDRE RENEE GIROUARD

, Defendant and Appellant. A166335

( Lake County Super. Ct.

No. CR961844 )

Defendant Andre Renee Girouard appeals from a judgment following

his plea of no contest to one count of assault with a deadly weapon ( Pen.

Code, § 245 , subd. (a) (1) 1 )

. Defendant admitted he had one prior “strike”

conviction , and he admitted various aggravating factors were true

.

Additional counts were dismissed with a Harvey waiver. 2

The underlying crime arose out of an incident at a motel while

defendant was drinking alcohol with two females

. He touched one of the

females inappropriately, and hit the other with a bottle twice , pushed her to

the floor, and struck her numerous times

. The trial court imposed the upper

1 All further statutory references are to the Penal Code unless otherwise

indicated.

2 People v. Harvey (1979) 25 Cal.3d 754.2

term of four years, doubled pursuant to the Three Strikes Law

. Defendant

filed a notice of appeal indicating this appeal is based on post

- plea matters

.

Defendant’s court

- appointed counsel filed a brief raising no issues and

seeking our independent review of the record pursuant to People v. Wende

(1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 ( Wende ). The brief includes counsel’s declaration

stating that counsel reviewed the record and determined a brief raising no

issues was appropriate, counsel advised defendant a Wende brief would be

filed and provided him a copy of the brief, counsel informed defendant of his

right to file a supplemental brief within 30 days, and counsel informed

defendant that he could request the court to relieve her as counsel

. A proof of

service a ccompanying the brief indicates that it was served on defendant by

mail on January 19 , 202 3

. M ore than 30 days has now elapsed, and

defendant has not filed a supplemental brief. We reviewed the post

- plea

record on appeal and we have found no reasonably arguable appellate issue.

( People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th 106, 124.)

D ISPOSITION

The judgment is affirmed.

FUJISAKI, ACTING P.J.

WE CONCUR:

PETROU, J.

RODRÍGUEZ, J.

People v. Girouard (

A166335)
```

[House Report 110-574]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

110th Congress                                                   Report
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 2d Session                                                     110-574

======================================================================

 
RELATING TO THE CONSIDERATION OF THE BILL (H.R. 5724) TO IMPLEMENT THE 
            UNITED STATES-COLOMBIA TRADE PROMOTION AGREEMENT

                                _______
                                

   April 9, 2008.--Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

                                _______
                                

  Ms. Slaughter, from the Committee on Rules, submitted the following

                              R E P O R T

                      [To accompany H. Res. 1092]

    The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration 
House Resolution 1092, by a record vote of 9 to 3, report the 
same to the House with the recommendation that the resolution 
be adopted.

                SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

    The resolution relates to the consideration of H.R. 5724, 
to implement the United States-Colombia Trade Promotion 
Agreement. The resolution provides that section 151(e)(1) and 
section 151(f)(1) of the Trade Act of 1974 shall not apply in 
the case of H.R. 5724.

                            COMMITTEE VOTES

    The results of each record vote on an amendment or motion 
to report, together with the names of those voting for and 
against, are printed below:

Rules Committee record vote No. 466

    Date: April 9, 2008.
    Measure: H. Res. 1092, Relating to the consideration of the 
bill (H.R. 5724) to implement the United States-Colombia Trade 
Promotion Agreement.
    Motion by: Mr. McGovern.
    Summary of motion: To report the rule.
    Results: Adopted 9-3.
    Vote by Member: McGovern--Yea; Hastings (FL)--Yea; Matsui--
Yea; Cardoza--Yea; Welch--Yea; Castor--Yea; Arcuri--Yea; 
Sutton--Yea; Dreier--Nay; Hastings (WA)--Nay; Sessions--Nay; 
Slaughter--Yea.

                                  

```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

United States of America

v. 2:13-cr-04

Ryan D. Kasler 

ORDER

There being no objections, the court hereby adopts the Report

and Recommendation of the magistrate judge (Doc. 19) that the

defendant’s guilty plea be accepted. The court accepts the

defendant’s plea of guilty to Count 1 of the indictment, and he is

hereby adjudged guilty on that count. The court will defer the

decision of whether to accept the plea agreement until the

sentencing hearing.

Date: April 2, 2013 s\James L. Graham 

 James L. Graham

 United States District Judge

Case: 2:13-cr-00004-JLG Doc #: 21 Filed: 04/02/13 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 162 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 8, 2007 

Received and referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of Congress that Congress and the 

President should increase basic pay for members of the 

Armed Forces. 

Whereas the United States continues to rely extensively upon 

the members of the Army, Navy, Marine Corps, Air 

Force, and Coast Guard who are deployed overseas and 

stationed at military support installations within the 

United States; 

Whereas members of the Armed Forces, regardless of branch 

of service or whether serving in an active or a 


cnoel on PRODPC60 with BILLS
2 

HCON 162 RFS 

reserve component, have carried out their mission objectives with valor, distinction, and steadfast dedication to 

the cause of liberty and democracy; 

Whereas more than 1,600,000 members of the Armed Forces 

have deployed to Iraq or Afghanistan, and many of these 

members have served multiple deployments; 

Whereas there are more than 3,000,000 family members and 

other dependents of the members of the Armed Forces 

serving on active duty and in reserve components; 

Whereas nearly 50 percent of the members of the Armed 

Forces, who are deployed away from their permanent 

duty stations, have left families with children behind; 

Whereas over 50 percent of the members of the Armed 

Forces who are currently deployed in Iraq are married; 

Whereas military families have persevered in the face of challenges and continue to provide critically important comfort and care and numerous other contributions to their 

loved ones deployed overseas or stationed within the 

United States; 

Whereas there currently is a 4 percent gap between the pay 

increases provided to members of the Armed Forces and 

the pay increases provided to private sector employees; 

and 

Whereas it is in the national interest of the United States to 

offer to the members of the Armed Forces comparable 

pay to that which the civilian sector provides in order to 

retain highly qualified men and women in uniform and to 

faithfully reward their valiant service to the United 

States: Now, therefore, be it 


cnoel on PRODPC60 with BILLS
3 

HCON 162 RFS 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that— 

3 (1) Congress and the President should increase 

4 basic pay for members of all components of the 

5 Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps, and Coast 

6 Guard by 3.5 percent, effective January 1, 2008; 

7 and 

8 (2) Congress and the President should increase 

9 the basic pay for members of all components of the 

10 Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps, and Coast 

11 Guard during fiscal years 2009 through 2012 by at 

least 1 12 ⁄2 of 1 percent more than the raise calculated 

13 under the Employment Cost Index (ECI). 

Passed the House of Representatives November 6, 

2007. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 


cnoel on PRODPC60 with BILLS
(Reap. Dec. 8395)

Entry No. 757109.

#### Hensel, Bruckmann & Lorbacher, Inc. *v.*United States

(Decided February 24, 1955)

*Eugene B. Pickrell*for the plaintiff.

*Warren E. Burger,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Wilson, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the plaintiff and the Assistant Attorney General of the United States, that the *462merchandise covered by the appeal for reappraisement above numbered consists of Cyanine Green, Supra Blue and Azogen Blue.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the appeal as to the items Supra Blue and Azogen Blue listed on the invoice in this appeal for reappraisement is abandoned.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the value of a competitive article similar to the Cyanine Green above mentioned, manufactured or produced in the United States at the time of the exportation of the involved merchandise to the United States, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature, and all other costs, charges, and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition packed ready for delivery, at which the merchandise was freely offered for sale for domestic consumption to all purchasers in the principal market of the United States, in the ordinary course of trade and in the usual wholesale quantities, was Two dollars and fifteen cents ($2.15) per pound.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the appeal for reappraisement above mentioned be submitted on this stipulation.

> *******

On the agreed facts, I find the American selling price, as that value is defined in section 402 (g) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the cyanine green here involved, and that such value was $2.15 per pound.

The appeal having been abandoned insofar as it relates to all other merchandise, to that extent the appeal is dismissed.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
Before the First Division,

January 26, 1940

No. 43113.

#### Petitions 5920-R, etc., of Golding Bros. Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Brown, J.

Following Abstract 39917 the court granted the petitions.
Exhibit 32.2
 
 
 
 Certification of CFO Pursuant to
 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
 As Adopted Pursuant to
 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of U.S. Energy Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Robert Scott Lorimer, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:
 
 (1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 
 
 
 
 /s/  Robert Scott LorimerRobert Scott Lorimer,Chief Financial OfficerAugust 7, 2009
 
 
 This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
 
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to U.S. Energy Corp. and will be retained by U.S. Energy Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM UNIFAB
INTERNATIONAL, INC'S JUNE 30, 2000 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                             194
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   21,647
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      7,113
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                37,873
<PP&E>                                          33,034
<DEPRECIATION>                                     514
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  90,199
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           42,402
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            68
<OTHER-SE>                                      44,045
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    90,199
<SALES>                                         20,232
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                20,232
<CGS>                                           18,220
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   18,220
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   524
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (380)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (144)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (236)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (236)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.03)


</TABLE>