alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 394 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 394

Honoring and recognizing Acting Architect of the Capitol Stephen Ayers 
for his contributions to the construction of the Capitol Visitor Center 
     and his dedication to the maintenance of the Capitol complex.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 22, 2008

   Mr. Wamp submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
 referred to the Committee on House Administration, and in addition to 
the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, for a period to be 
subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 
  of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 
                               concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Honoring and recognizing Acting Architect of the Capitol Stephen Ayers 
for his contributions to the construction of the Capitol Visitor Center 
     and his dedication to the maintenance of the Capitol complex.

Whereas on February 4, 2007, Stephen T. Ayers assumed the position of Acting 
        Architect of the Capitol;
Whereas Mr. Ayers joined the Architect of the Capitol office in 1997 as 
        assistant superintendent for the Senate Office Buildings;
Whereas Mr. Ayers was promoted to deputy superintendent in 1999 and then 
        superintendent of the Library Buildings and Ground in 2002;
Whereas in March 2005, Mr. Ayers was appointed deputy architect and chief 
        operating officer;
Whereas Mr. Ayers' extensive career in architecture includes a Bachelor's of 
        Science degree in architecture, Master's of Science in systems 
        management, 5 years of service with the 6510th Civil Engineering 
        Squadron, for which he earned the Meritorious Service Medal, and 6 years 
        as general engineer for Voice of America in the District of Columbia, 
        Greece, and Germany;
Whereas Mr. Ayers inherited the challenge of completing the Capitol Visitor 
        Center, a 580,000 square foot expansion of the United States Capitol;
Whereas Mr. Ayers has managed the completion of this project with 
        professionalism, acting in the best interest of the Congress, the 
        Capitol, and the millions of visitors who will pass through the Capitol 
        Visitor Center every year; and
Whereas the Capitol Visitor Center is expected to open on December 2, 2008, 
        largely due to Mr. Ayers' leadership: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That Congress recognizes and honors Acting Architect of the Capitol 
Stephen T. Ayers for his contributions to the construction of the 
Capitol Visitor Center and his dedication to the maintenance of the 
Capitol complex.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2017151EN.01003302.xml

| 15.5.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 151/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.5.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 151/33

---

Judgment of the General Court of 29 March 2017 — Alcohol Countermeasure Systems (International) v EUIPO — Lion Laboratories (ALCOLOCK)

(Case T-638/15) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU word mark ALCOLOCK - United Kingdom word mark ALCOLOCK - Relative ground for refusal - Article 8(1)(a) and (b) and Article 53(1)(a) and (b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Genuine use of the earlier mark))

(2017/C 151/42)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Alcohol Countermeasure Systems (International) Inc. (Toronto, Canada) (represented by: E. Baud and P. Marchiset, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: S. Hanne, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Lion Laboratories Ltd (Barry, United Kingdom)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 11 August 2015 (Case R 1323/2014-1) relating to invalidity proceedings between Lion Laboratories and Alcohol Countermeasure Systems (International).

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Alcohol Countermeasure Systems (International) Inc. to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Alcohol Countermeasure Systems (International) Inc. to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 16, 18.1.2016.

1

---
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 89 (Wednesday, May 9, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 26349]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-8846]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP07-414-000]


Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation; Notice of Proposed Changes 
in FERC Gas Tariff

May 2, 2007.
    Take notice that on April 30, 2007, Columbia Gas Transmission 
Corporation (Columbia) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, Second Revised Volume No. 1, the following revised tariff 
sheets with a proposed effective date of June 1, 2007:

Ninth Revised Sheet No. 501
Fourth Revised Sheet No. 501A
Fifth Revised Sheet No. 502
Fifth Revised Sheet No. 502A
Third Revised Sheet No. 502B
Ninth Revised Sheet No. 503
Fourth Revised Sheet No. 503.01
Third Revised Sheet No. 503A
Seventh Revised Sheet No. 511

    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed in accordance with the provisions of 
Section 154.210 of the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 154.210). 
Anyone filing an intervention or protest must serve a copy of that 
document on the Applicant. Anyone filing an intervention or protest on 
or before the intervention or protest date need not serve motions to 
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#662023342529080a0f080335131616091412260003140548010910"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="5d1b180f1e1233313433380e282d2d322f291d3b382f3e733a322b">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E7-8846 Filed 5-8-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
June 18, 1970

No. 70-31

#### Donald J. Gagnon, CAPT, U. S. Air Force v United States.

On consideration of the Motion to Dissolve the stay of proceedings issued by order pf this Court on April 17, 1970, and” Motion to Dismiss the Petitiori'for Writ of Mandamus filed by appellate defense counsel in the above-entitled case, it is, by the Court, this 18 day of June 1970,

ORDERED:

That said motion be, and the same is, hereby granted.
Exhibit
      14




Code
      of
      Ethics for Finance Professionals




This
      Code
      of Ethics applies to the President, the Chief Financial Officer, the Controller,
      and other persons performing similar functions for BNP U.S. Funding L.L.C.
      (the
“Firm”). The purpose of this Code of Ethics is to promote honest and ethical
      conduct, particularly in relation to the maintenance of the Firm’s financial
      books and records and the preparation of financial statements. This Code of
      Ethics supplements other codes of conduct of the Firm (or its affiliates) that
      may be applicable from time to time.





A
      finance
      professional is expected to:





Act
      with
      honesty and promote ethical conduct, including the ethical handling of actual
      or
      apparent conflicts of interest between personal and professional
      relationships;





Disclose
      to the Board of Directors or the Corporate Secretary any material transaction
      or
      relationship that reasonably could be expected to give rise to a conflict of
      interest;





Assist
      in
      the providing of full, fair, accurate, timely, and understandable disclosure
      in
      reports and documents that the Firm files with, or submits to, the Securities
      and Exchange Commission and in other public communications made by the
      Firm;





Comply
      with applicable governmental laws, rules and regulations of federal, state
      and
      local governments and other appropriate regulatory agencies;




Promptly
      report to the Board of Directors or Corporate Secretary any violation of this
      Code of Ethics or other matters that might compromise the integrity of the
      Firm’s financial statements; and





Consult
      promptly with the Board of Directors should such professional violate this
      Code
      of Ethics.




The
      Firm
      will take all necessary steps to enforce this Code of Ethics, and violations
      thereof may result in disciplinary action, including dismissal. Violations
      of
      this Code of Ethics may also constitute violations of law and may subject the
      Firm and finance professionals to criminal or civil penalties. Questions
      regarding the application of this Code of Ethics should be promptly addressed
      to
      the Corporate Secretary.
#### F. W. Woolworth Co. *v.*United States

No. 6059.

Invoice dated Sonneberg, Germany, August 19, 1939.

Certified August 22, 1939.

Entered at Baltimore, Md., September 21, 1939.

Entry No. 1036.

(Decided October 17, 1944)

*Sharreits & Hillis (Edward P. Sharretts*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Bao,*Assistant Attorney General *(Daniel I. Auster,*special attorney), for the defendant.

Kincheloe, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision- upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> It is hereby stipulated, by and between counsel for the respective parties hereto, subject to the approval of the court, that the facts and circumstances relating to the item of 10 per centum commission in the case listed in the annexed schedule, identified on the invoices with “xx” in green ink and the initials CHR of Examiner Charles H. Ritz, are in all material respects the same as the facts and circumstances relating to the item of 10 per centum commission specified in the invoices relating to glass tree ornaments, novelties, and figures covered by reappraisements *381113038-A, 113040-A, and 113468-A of the F. W. Woolworth Co. and passed upon by the United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals in *United States*v. *S. S. Kresge Co., B. Shackman & Co., Rice & Co. Corp., Strauss-Eckardt Co., Inc., F. W. Woolworth Co.,*26 C. C. P. A. 349, 352, wherein the court held that “A purchasing commission, charged for the handling of merchandise, is not a proper part of dutiable value.”

> It is further stipulated and agreed, that on the date of exportation of the merchandise involved in the case listed in the annexed schedule, identified on the invoices with “xx” in green ink and the initials CHR of Examiner Charles H. Ritz, articles such and similar thereto were freely offered for sale and sold to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country of exportation in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade for exportation to the United States at the *per se*unit invoice prices, plus 3)4 per centum social assessments for insurance, vacation, and holiday costs, plus packing, as invoiced, and that there was no higher foreign value.

> As to all other items, the appeal is abandoned.

> It is further stipulated and agreed, that the record in *United States*v. *S. S. Kresge Co. et al.,*26 C. C. P. A. 349, 352, be incorporated herein and that the said appeal to reappraisement is submitted on this stipulation.

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to he the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise represented on the invoice by the items marked “xx” in green ink and the initials CHE. of Examiner Charles H. Eitz, and that such values are the *per se*unit invoice prices, plus *3}{*per centum social assessments for insurance, vacation, and holiday costs, plus packing, as invoiced.

The appeal having been abandoned insofar as it relates to all other merchandise, to that extent the appeal is hereby dismissed. .

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
(logo) DIXON HUGHES GOODMANLLP

 

 

**Report of IndependentRegistered Public Accounting Firm**

 

 

To the Board of Managers ofC-III Capital Partners LLC, the 

Sole Member of C-III AssetManagement LLC:

 

We have examined management’sassertion, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Assessmentof Compliance with SEC Regulation AB Servicing Criteria, that C-III AssetManagement LLC (the “Company”) complied with the servicing criteriaset forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’sRegulation AB for all transactions for which the Company acted as servicerinvolving first lien commercial mortgage loans (the “Platform”) asof and for the year ended December 31, 2016, excluding criteria 1122(d)(1)(iii),1122(d)(2)(ii), 1122(d)(3)(1) – 1122(d)(3)(iv), 1122(d)(4)(ii),1122(d)(4)(v), 1122(d)(4)(ix) and 1122(d)(4)(xv), which management hasdetermined are not applicable to the activities performed by the Company withrespect to the Platform. Management is responsible for the Company’scompliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express anopinion on the assertion based on our examination.

 

Our examination was conductedin accordance with attestation standards established by the American Instituteof Certified Public Accountants, as adopted by the Public Company AccountingOversight Board (United States), and, accordingly, included examining, on atest basis, evidence supporting management’s assertion and performingsuch other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Webelieve that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. 

 

In our opinion,management’s assertion that the Company complied with the aforementionedapplicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016 isfairly stated, in all material aspects.

 

 

/s/ Dixon Hughes Goodman LLP

 

Asheville, North Carolina

February 6, 2017
No. 53219.

#### Bellows & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 137205-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
##### 



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
§906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
   (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the
periods expressed in the Report.
 /s/ John H. MarmadukeJohn H. MarmadukePresident and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)/s/ Dan CrowDan CrowVice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) A signed original of this written statement required by §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has
been provided to Hastings Entertainment, Inc. and will be retained by Hastings Entertainment, Inc.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission, or its staff, upon request.
 65
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Water-quality conditions withan emphasis on cyanobacteria and associated toxins and taste-and-odor compoundsin the Kansas River, Kansas, July 2012 through September 2016**
 
Report
Appendices:010203040506
 
SuDoc Number:I 19.42/4-4:2018-5089
Item Number:0624-B-02 (online)
CGP systemNumber:001081644
 
October 4, 2018
No. 40409.

#### Protests 192653-G, etc., of Ferd. Bing & Co.’s Successors (New York).

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of boxes, vases, trays, frames, lamps, coupes, book ends, bottle, inkstands, jardinieres, candelabra, atomizers, compots, candlesticks, plates, and shoe horns chiefly used on the table, in the kitchen or household, or hollow ware. The claim at 40 percent under paragraph 339 was therefore sustained. *United States*v. Fried*laender*(21 C. C. P. A. 103, T. D. 46445), *Dow*v. *United States*(id. 282, T. D. 46816), *Woolworth*v. *United States*(T. D. 47857), and *Rice*v. *United States*(T. D. 49373) cited.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 286 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 286

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 6, 2008

        Received and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing the sense of Congress that Earl Lloyd should be recognized 
   and honored for breaking the color barrier and becoming the first 
African-American to play in the National Basketball Association League 
                             58 years ago.

Whereas Earl Lloyd was born in Alexandria, Virginia on April 3, 1928;
Whereas Earl Lloyd first developed his passion for basketball at the city of 
        Alexandria's segregated Parker-Gray High School;
Whereas Earl Lloyd was drafted by the NBA in 1950 as a ninth round pick by the 
        Washington Capitols;
Whereas on October 31, 1950, Earl Lloyd became the first African-American to 
        play in the NBA;
Whereas Earl Lloyd dissolved the color barrier in the NBA 3 years after Jackie 
        Robinson had done the same in baseball;
Whereas Earl Lloyd proudly put his professional career on hold and served in the 
        Army for 2 years before returning to the NBA;
Whereas Earl Lloyd played 560 NBA games and won a championship before retiring 
        in 1960;
Whereas in 2003, Earl Lloyd was inducted into the Naismith Memorial Basketball 
        Hall of Fame; and
Whereas the newly constructed basketball court at T.C. Williams in his home town 
        of Alexandria was named in his honor: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of Congress that Earl Lloyd should be recognized 
and honored for breaking the color barrier and becoming the first 
African-American to play in the National Basketball Association League 
58 years ago.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 5, 2008.

            Attest:

                                            LORRAINE C. MILLER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-6353 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

PHILLIP ANTONIO OWENS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle

District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Frank W. Bullock, Jr.,

District Judge. (CR-93-50)

Submitted: July 27, 2005 Decided: August 3, 2005

Before KING, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Phillip Antonio Owens, Appellant Pro Se. Sandra Jane Hairston,

Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Phillip Antonio Owens appeals the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying

relief on Owens’ motion for a reduction in sentence. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United

States v. Owens, No. CR-93-50 (M.D.N.C. filed Feb. 7, 2005 &

entered Feb. 8, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
(logo)Deutsche Bank

1761East St. Andrew Place

SantaAna, CA 92705-4934

 

Tel714 247 6000

Fax714 247 6009 

 

 

ANNUAL STATEMENT AS TO COMPLIANCE

 

COMM 2016-DC2

 

Theundersigned, David Co, a Director of Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as theCertificate Administrator (a "Certifying Servicer") under the Poolingand Servicing Agreement, dated as of March 1, 2016 (the "Agreement''), byand among, Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation, as Depositor,Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer and SpecialServicer, Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee, Deutsche BankTrust Company Americas, as Certificate Administrator, Paying Agent, andCustodian, Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, as Operating Advisor, and ParkBridge Lender Services LLC, as Asset Representations Reviewer here by certifiesin accordance with Section 10.11 of the Agreement:

 

A) Areview of such Certifying Servicer's activities from January 1, 2017 toDecember 31, 2017 (the "reporting period") and of such CertifyingServicer's performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer'ssupervision and

 

B)That, as to the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, suchCertifying Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement, inall material respects throughout the reporting period.

 

 

DEUTSCHEBANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS

AsCertificate Administrator

 

/s/David Co

BY: David Co

Title: Director

Date: March 1, 2018
No. 47586.

#### Protests 39616-K, etc., of Eurasia Import Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain, of the items consist of knotted hemp hats, not blocked or trimmed, and not bleached, dyed, colored, or stained, the claim at 25 percent under paragraph 1504 (b) (1) was sustained as to those items.
No. 42019.

#### Protest 943468-G of Schenley Import Corp. (New York).

Opinion by

Sullivan, J.

The protest was sustained in accordance with the report of the collector.