alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000102438
<NAME> USP REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                       2,137,965
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  480,026
<ALLOWANCES>                                   219,199
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               485,883
<PP&E>                                      40,722,496
<DEPRECIATION>                              12,540,113
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              31,067,058
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,271,950
<BONDS>                                     13,925,439
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     3,880,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  11,989,669
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                31,067,058
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,889,489
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,226,108
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               347,361
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             695,499
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                620,521
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            620,521
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   620,521
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .16
        

</TABLE>
### . Safe, Secure, EffiCient and Environmentally Responsible Maritime Operations

Mr. Demiis N. DeVany Chief, Essential Air Service Division Office ofAviation Analysis U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE Washington, D.C. 20590

Dear Mr. DeVany, 1000 Harbor Way, Suite 204; Juneau, Alaska 99801 Ph: (907) 463-2607 Fax: (800) 682-2898

September 19, 2012

The Marine Exchange of Alaska strongly supports the continuation ofEssential Air Service (EAS) program support ofthe Icy Bay airport that provides reliable and cost effective aviation service to· a lodge that supports the non-profit Marine Exchange's AIS (Automatic Identification**~i--'~·.·** · ).**v;es~~"racking** receiver that a.ids safe,**se~ure,** efficient**a~d enviro~me~tally** **so~nd** fllir

. . e**_<?Pttra~ions.** The vessel trackmg system m Icy Bay provides real time mformat10n on 't'he loltiitions of\ressels to the Coast Guard, the State ofAlaska and the maritime industry to aid**l~eaicfl£arrd·rescJ4e** and emergency response to maritime incidents.**~~'** . .**~-1;** ·• -- .**~** . "

. 

## leY Bay**isstr(1.t~gically** located near one ofthe inost productive and dangerous fishing grounds in :Alaska, ir.aprf$}Jriately cailed Fairweather Grounds, where many vessels have sank and mariners lost their'lhi'es.\; The AIS receiving site in Icy Bay provides a significant enhancement to maritime safetyin that region ofAlaska and reliable air service is critical for ensuring the system is maintained, serviced and repaired as needed by technicians who travel from Juneau to the site.

In light ofthe above I urge continued EAS at Icy Bay Alaska. 

# ?12**Cap~ge,** U.S. Coast Guard (Retired) Executive Director Marine Exchange ofAlaska ._ ..
January 9, 1941

No. 45193.

#### Protest 20423-K of Harry Solodow.

Abstract 44763. Plaintiff’s application for rehearing granted.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                              49
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,743
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        197
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,492
<PP&E>                                          35,638
<DEPRECIATION>                                  20,730
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  18,407
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,696
<BONDS>                                          8,642
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                         755
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    18,407
<SALES>                                         12,378
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                12,378
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,329
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 543
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,419
<INCOME-TAX>                                       911
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,508
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,508
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     3.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     3.02
        

</TABLE>
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-41328

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JOSE JUAN PICHARDO-LICEA,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:08-CR-1222-ALL

Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose Juan PichardoLicea has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Pichardo-Licea has not filed a

response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no

nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to

withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein,

and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

October 20, 2009

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                       Certification Furnished Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Unifab International,
Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended March 31, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, who is the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      1.    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
            and

      2.    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company for the period covered by the Report.

                                              /s/ Peter J. Roman
                                              ---------------------
                                              Name:  Peter J. Roman
                                              Title: Chief Financial Officer
                                              Date:  May 14, 2004

                                       25
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 41 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.Con.Res.41
                                              Agreed to January 23, 2007

                       One Hundred Tenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday,
            the fourth day of January, two thousand and seven

                          Concurrent Resolution

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),  
That when the House adjourns on the legislative day of Wednesday, 
January 24, 2007, on a motion offered pursuant to this concurrent 
resolution by its Majority Leader or his designee, it stand adjourned 
until 2 p.m. on Monday, January 29, 2007, or until the time of any 
reassembly pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution, 
whichever occurs first; and that when the House adjourns on the 
legislative day of Wednesday, January 31, 2007, on a motion offered 
pursuant to this concurrent resolution by its Majority Leader or his 
designee, it stand adjourned until 2 p.m. on Monday, February 5, 2007, 
or until the time of any reassembly pursuant to section 2 of this 
concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first.
    Sec. 2. The Speaker or her designee, after consultation with the 
Minority Leader, shall notify the Members of the House to reassemble at 
such place and time as she may designate if, in her opinion, the public 
interest shall warrant it.
Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.
```
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 398 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 398

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That when the House adjourns on the legislative day of Thursday, July 
31, 2008, Friday, August 1, 2008, or Saturday, August 2, 2008, on a 
motion offered pursuant to this concurrent resolution by its Majority 
Leader or his designee, it stand adjourned until 2 p.m. on Monday, 
September 8, 2008, or until the time of

              

 any reassembly pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution, 
whichever occurs first; and that when the Senate recesses or adjourns 
on any day from Friday, August 1, 2008, through Friday, September 5, 
2008, on a motion offered pursuant to this concurrent resolution by its 
Majority Leader or his designee, it stand recessed or adjourned until 
noon on Monday, September 8, 2008, or such other time on that day as 
may be specified in the motion to recess or adjourn, or until the time 
of any reassembly pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution, 
whichever occurs first.
    Sec. 2.  The Speaker of the House and the Majority Leader of the 
Senate, or their respective designees, acting jointly after 
consultation with the Minority Leader of the House and the Minority 
Leader of the Senate, shall notify the Members of the House and the 
Senate, respectively, to reassemble at such place and time as they may 
designate if, in their opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 30, 2008.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
110th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                            H. CON. RES. 398

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Providing for a conditional adjournment of the House of Representatives 
         and a conditional recess or adjournment of the Senate
```
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jasper RIVERA, also known as Diablo, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 04-41288.

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Aug. 26, 2005.

*623Robert Lavelle Hobbs, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Beaumont, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Frank Warren Henderson, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Tyler, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before BARKSDALE, STEWART, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Jasper Rivera appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction on one count of carjacking and one count of using a firearm in relation to a crime of violence, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2119, 924(c). Rivera contends that certain sentencing enhancements violate the Sixth Amendment rule announced in *United States v. Booker,*— U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), and the district court erred by adjusting his offense level for abducting his victims. Neither Rivera nor the Government addresses the effect of the appeal-waiver in Rivera’s written plea agreement. We examine that waiver *sua sponte. See United States v. Martinez,*263 F.3d 436, 438 (5th Cir.2001); *cf. United States v. Rhodes,*253 F.3d 800, 804 (5th Cir.2001) (disregarding waiver provision where Government expressly chose *not*to rely on it).

Our review of the guilty-plea hearing transcript demonstrates the waiver was both informed and voluntary. *See United States v. Portillo,*18 F.3d 290, 292-93 (5th Cir.), *cert. denied,*513 U.S. 893, 115 S.Ct. 244, 130 L.Ed.2d 166 (1994); *United States v. Melancon,*972 F.2d 566, 568 (5th Cir.1992). Rivera’s challenges do not fall within any of the four exceptions to the waiver (punishment exceeding the statutory maximum; upward departure; arithmetic errors in guideline calculations; and ineffective assistance of counsel that affects the waiver’s validity). *See, e.g., United States v. Bond,*414 F.3d 542 (5th Cir.2005) (“statutory maximum” in waiver refers to maximum allowed by statute, not the guideline maximum authorized by guilty plea or jury verdict); *United States v. McKinney,*406 F.3d 744, 746-47 (5th Cir.2005) (sentence imposed in violation of *Booker*rule did not constitute upward departure). Accordingly, Rivera’s appeal is DISMISSED because it is barred by his waiver.

Counsel are cautioned that failure in the future to brief the effect of an appeal-waiver may result in the imposition of sanctions.

*DISMISSED.*

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     The Schedule  contains  summary  financial  information  extracted from the
registrant's  financial  statements  as of and for the three month  period ended
June 29, 1996 and is qualified  in its  entirety by reference to such  financial
statements.
</LEGEND>

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-29-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-29-1996
<CASH>                                       2,079,415
<SECURITIES>                                 2,346,045
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  3,830,275
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             8,968,957
<PP&E>                                       4,699,863
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,878,843
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,074,372
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,753,021
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       153,175
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,802,213
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,074,374
<SALES>                                      4,305,821
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,305,821
<CGS>                                        2,824,152
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,824,152
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,035,608
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              18,613
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (616,931)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (548,013)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (548,013)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.04)
        


</TABLE>
Searched for **https://longtermcare.acl.gov/**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **https://longtermcare.acl.gov/**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
# C_2016027EN.01005702.xml

| 25.1.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 27/57 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.1.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 27/57

---

Order of the General Court of 24 November 2015 — Delta Group agroalimentare v Commission

(Case T-163/15) (1)

1

((Action for annulment - Italian market in poultrymeat - Exceptional support measures to resolve specific problems concerning the poultrymeat sector in Italy - Export refunds for poultrymeat destined for certain African countries - Rejection of the applicant’s request for exceptional measures - Act not open to challenge - Inadmissibility))

(2016/C 027/74)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Delta Group agroalimentare Srl (Porto Viro, Italy) (represented by: V. Migliorini, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: B. Schima and D. Nardi, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of the Commission’s letter of 9 February 2015 (Ref. Ares (2015) 528512), sent in reply to the applicant’s request for the adoption of exceptional support measures for the poultrymeat market on the basis of Article 219(1) or of Article 221 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 establishing a common organisation of the markets in agricultural products and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 922/72, (EEC) No 234/79, (EC) No 1037/2001 and (EC) No 1234/2007(OJ 2013 L 347, p. 671).

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

| 2. | Delta Group agroalimentare shall bear its own costs and shall pay those incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Delta Group agroalimentare shall bear its own costs and shall pay those incurred by the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 178, 1.6.2015.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                       1,525,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                8,896,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   282,000
<INVENTORY>                                  9,676,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            21,922,000
<PP&E>                                      25,580,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              16,347,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              37,781,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       11,226,000
<BONDS>                                      3,200,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     3,581,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  18,524,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                37,781,000
<SALES>                                     29,963,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            29,963,000
<CGS>                                       19,585,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               28,999,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                32,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             321,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                964,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   285,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            679,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   679,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .09


</TABLE>