alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 42007.

#### Protests 842249-G, etc., of Selsi Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of *Selsi*v. *United States*(C. D. 147) aneroid barometers and parts *364were held dutiable as machines and parts at 27% percent under paragraph 372 as claimed.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT KEITH RENARD LONG, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D19-4793 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed September 30, 2020. Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Philip J. Federico, Judge. Keith Renard Long, pro se.
PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. NORTHCUTT, LUCAS and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
No. 47597.

#### Protests 972701-G, etc., of Hudson Steel & Tube Corp. (New York).

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of bicycle lamps with or without accompanying electric generators, and that they are of the same character as those the subject of *Wedemeyer v. United States*(7 Cust. Ct. 141, C. D. 556), the claim at 30 percent under paragraph 371 was sustained.
No. 45196.

Suit 4297.

#### *F. W. Woolworth Co.*v. *United States.*

C. D. 244 affirmed. C. A. D. 151.
EXHIBIT 35.1



World Omni Financial Corp.

Servicer Compliance Statement

Pursuant to Item 1123

of Regulation AB



I, Joseph A. Venezia,
do hereby certify that I am the Chief Financial Officer of World Omni Financial Corp., a Florida corporation, and further certify
on behalf of World Omni Financial Corp. in its capacity as servicer (the “Servicer”) under the Sale and Servicing Agreement,
dated as of March 23, 2016 (the “Agreement”), among World Omni Auto Receivables Trust 2016-A, as Issuing Entity, World
Omni Auto Receivables LLC, as Depositor, and the Servicer, as follows:



(i)        A
review of the activities of the Servicer during the period covered by the issuing entity’s Annual Report on form 10-K for
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance under the Agreement, has been
made under my supervision.



(ii)       To
the best of my knowledge, based on the review described above, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement
in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto
set my hand as of March 8, 2019.



| | WORLD OMNI FINANCIAL CORP.
| | --------------------------



| | By: | /s/Joseph A. Venezia          
| | --- | ------------------------------
| |     | Name: Joseph A. Venezia       
| |     | Title: Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.7


                              CERTIFICATE OF TRUST
                                       OF
                            DYNEGY CAPITAL TRUST III


     The undersigned, the trustees of Dynegy Capital Trust III as of the date
hereof, desiring to form a business trust pursuant to Delaware Business Trust
Act, 12 Del. C. (S)3801 (the "Act"), hereby certify as follows:

     (a) Name.  The name of the business trust being formed hereby  is "Dynegy
Capital Trust III" (the "Trust").

     (b) Delaware Trustee.  The name and business address of the Delaware
resident trustee of the Trust meeting the requirements of Section 3807 of the
Act are as follows:

          Bank One Delaware, Inc.
          3 Christina Centre
          201 North Walnut Street
          Wilmington, Delaware 19801-2920

     (c) Effectiveness.  This Certificate of Trust shall be effective
immediately upon filing in the Office of the Secretary of State of the State of
Delaware.

Date: February 1, 2000


                                  /s/ Robert T. Ray
                              ---------------------------------------
                              Name:      Robert T. Ray
                              Title:     Administrative Trustee


                              Bank One Trust Company, National Association as
                              Property Trustee

                              By: /s/ John R. Prendiville
                                 ---------------------------------
                              Name:      John R. Prendiville
                              Title:     Vice President

                              Bank One Delaware, Inc., as Delaware Trustee

                              By: /s/ John R. Prendiville
                                 ---------------------------------
                              Name:      John R. Prendiville
                              Title:     Vice President
No. 65722.

#### Quon Quon Company et al. *v.*United States,

protests 58/25611, etc. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of stone lanterns similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Otagiri Mercantile Co., Inc., et al.*v. *United States*(44 Cust. Ct. 184, C.D. 2173), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Exhibit 35.1



|     |  |                                                                                                          
|---- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|LOGO |  | Commercial Mortgage Servicing D1050-084, 8th Fl 401 South Tryon Street
Charlotte, NC 28202 1-800-326-1334

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of April 1, 2016, by and among CITIGROUP COMMERCIAL
MORTGAGE SECURITIES INC., as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, MIDLAND LOAN SERVICES, A DIVISION OF PNC BANK, NATOIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Special Servicer, PARK BRIDGE LENDER SERVICES, LLC, as Operating Advisor and
Asset Representations Reviewer, CITIBANK N.A., as Certificate Administrator and DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS as Trustee, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2016-GC37 (the Agreement). Capitalized
terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

Pursuant to Section 10.08 of this
Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January, 2017 through December 31, 2017 (the Reporting Period), and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has
been made under my supervision, and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day

of February 2018.



|                        
|------------------------
|LOGO                    
|Daniel Bober            
|Executive Vice President
|Wells Fargo Bank        



|                       |  |     
|---------------------- |  | ----
|Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |  | LOGO
(Reap. Dec. 8310)

#### United States *v.*Geo. S. Bush & Co., Inc.

Entry Nos. 149; 12.

(Decided May 14, 1954)

*Warren E. Burger,*Assistant Attorney General, for the plaintiff.

*Siegel, Mandell & Davidson*for the defendant.

LawRence, Judge:

The above-enumerated appeals were filed in accordance with the provisions of section 501 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. § 1501), as amended by the Customs Administrative Act of 1938, for a reappraisement of certain nickel handsaw steel imported from Sweden.

*643It has been stipulated by counsel for the parties hereto that the cost of production of the merchandise covered by said appeals, as provided for in section 402 (f) of said act (19 U. S. C. § 1402 (f)), is $43.50 United States currency per 100 pounds, packing included. It has been further agreed that there was no foreign, export, or United States value, as defined in sections 402 (c), (d), and (e), of said act (19 U. S. C. § 1402 (c), (d), and (e)), as amended by the Customs Administrative Act of 1938, at the time of exportation of the merchandise in issue.

On the agreed facts, I find that cost of production, as that value is defined in section 402 (f) of said act, is the proper basis for the determination of the value of the nickel bandsaw steel here involved, and that such value is $43.50 United States currency per 100 pounds, packing included.

Judgment will, issue accordingly.
No. 48742.

#### Protest 793669-G of Strohmeyer & Arpe Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

The record showed that the shipment consisted of dried peppers which are not capable of being marked; that the peppers were packed in baskets to which were attached paper tags bearing the marking “Pro. of Italy”; and that before the goods were released from customs custody the importer was required to stencil the word “Italy” on the baskets. Following Abstract 44274, in which the merchandise was marked in the identical manner as in the case at bar, the protest was sustained.
### Ground water in Santa Clara Valley, California

By: William O. Clark

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp519

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Santa Clara Valley extends southeastward from San Francisco, lying between the Diablo Range on the northeast and the Santa Cruz and Gabilan ranges on the southwest. (See Pl. I.) Its north end is occupied by the southern part of San Francisco Bay. Toward the south it rises gradually and becomes increasingly rough until it ceases to be a valley. Its trend is approximately parallel to the Pacific coast and to the main structural trend of the Coast Ranges. The drainage basin of Santa Clara Valley is about 140 miles long and has a maximum width of/ about 45 miles; the area tributary to the valley south of latitude 37° 40' is about 3,100 square miles.1 The valley itself has a length of about 100 miles, of which 70 miles is south of San Francisco Bay, a maximum width of about 15 miles, and an area, exclusive of the part. occupied by the bay, of about 590 square miles, or about 380,000 acres. This report covers only that part of Santa Clara Valley lying south · of latitude 37° 40', but there is some land north of this line on the east side of San Francisco Bay that may properly be considered a part of the valley.

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
# C_2017030EN.01004601.xml

| 30.1.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 30/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.1.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 30/46

---

Judgment of the General Court of 13 December 2016 — Puro Italian Style v EUIPO (smartline)

(Case T-744/15) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Application for EU figurative mark smartline - Absolute ground for refusal - No distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2017/C 030/51)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Puro Italian Style SpA (Modena, Italy) (represented by: F. Terrano, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: L. Rampini, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 7 October 2015 (Case R 2258/2014-1), concerning an application for registration of the figurative sign smartline as an EU trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Puro Italian Style SpA to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO). |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Puro Italian Style SpA to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).

---

(1)  OJ C 78, 29.2.2016.

1

---
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 29, 2020

No. 04-20-00213-CV

CITY OF SAN ANTONIO and Erik Walsh,

Appellants

v.

SAN ANTONIO PARK POLICE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION, Henry Bassuk and

 Rogelio Tamez,

Appellees

From the 285th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019-CI-18334

Honorable Aaron Haas, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellees’ brief was originally due July 20, 2020. Appellees’ first motion for 

extension of time was granted, extending the deadline for filing the brief to September 

18, 2020. On September 25, 2020, appellees filed their brief and a motion requesting an 

additional extension of time to file the brief until September 25, 2020, for a total 

extension of sixty-seven days. After consideration, we GRANT the motion. Appellees’ 

brief is deemed timely filed as of September 25, 2020.

_________________________________

Beth Watkins, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 29th day of September, 2020.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court

FILE COPY
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, John Ioannis Neocleous, President and Chief Executive Officer of Deseo Swimwear Inc., hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

| 1.              | the annual report on Form 10-K/A of Deseo Swimwear Inc. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                        |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      |
| 2.                                                                          | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Deseo Swimwear Inc.                                                                               |

 

|                    | **Deseo Swimwear Inc.** |                                                                                                                                    |
|--------------------|-------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|               |                    |                                                                                                                                    |   |
| Dated: May 8, 2022 | By:                     | */s/ John Ioannis Neocleous*                                                                                                            |   |
|               |                    | John Ioannis Neocleous

President and Director

Principal Executive Officer 

Principal Financial Officer

Principal Accounting Officer |   |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Union
Carbide Corporation's Form 10-Q fo the quarter ended March 31, 1998, and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000100790
<NAME> UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                              37
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     1057
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        609
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  1958
<PP&E>                                            7837
<DEPRECIATION>                                    3998
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    7077
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             1487
<BONDS>                                           1456
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           155
<OTHER-SE>                                        2312
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      7077
<SALES>                                           1561
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  1561
<CGS>                                             1161
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     1161
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   132<F1>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  27
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    205
<INCOME-TAX>                                        59
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                142
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       142
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.03<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.01<F2>
<FN>
<F1>Other expenses are equal to research and development of 37 and depreciation
and amortization of 95.
<F2>The EPS-PRIMARY amount represents basic earnings per share and the
EPS-DILUTED amount represents diluted earnings per share, computed in
accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 128, 
"Earnings Per Share."
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v MACK A. NAPIER, Recruit, U. S. Army, Appellant

12 USCMA 552, 31 CMR 138

No. 15,349

November 24, 1961

*Lieutenant Colonel Ralph W. Wofford*and *Captain Vernon C. Maulson*were on the brief for Appellant, Accused.

*Major Francis M. Cooper*and *Captain Alvin B. Fox*were on the brief for Appellee, United States.

Opinion of the Court

Quinn, Chief Judge:

The question raised by the accused on this appeal is whether he was prejudiced by the law officer’s allusion to instructions he gave “on several recent occasions” regarding “matters that are appropriate in arriving at a just sentence.” The Government contends that the procedure followed by the law officer was “favored” by the accused and, consequently, prevents him from claiming on this appeal that his rights were prejudiced. United States v Mullican, 7 USCMA 208, 21 CMR 334. Whether there was a calculated election of a specific procedure by the accused need not give us pause. Assuming the instruction amounted to an instruction by reference to the other cases, as contended by the accused, it falls squarely within our holding in United States v Forwerck, 12 USCMA 540, 31 CMR 126. For the reasons set out in our opinion in that case, the decision of the board of review is affirmed.

Judge Kilday concurs.

FERGUSON, Judge

(dissenting):

I dissent for the reasons set forth in my separate opinion in United States v Forwerck, 12 USCMA 540, 31 CMR 126, this day decided.
# C_2016410EN.01003602.xml

| 7.11.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 410/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.11.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 410/36

---

Order of the General Court of 14 September 2016 — Drex Technologies v Council

(Case T-710/15) (1)

1

(2016/C 410/63)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 59, 15.2.2016.

1

---
Before the First Division,

January 11, 1939

No. 40385.

#### Protests 711439-G, etc., of S. S. Perry et al. (Los Angeles).

*534Opinion by

Sullivan, J.

In accordance with, stipulation of counsel and on the authority of *United States*v. *Perry*(25 *C. C. P.*A. 282, T. D. 49395) the chicken rings in question were held free of duty as agricultural implements under paragraph 1604 as claimed.
Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2011-0219 Directorate Identifier: 2010-NM-228-AD 

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If 

they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed cell. 

Estimated Costs: 

Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

propeller, appliance) Action 

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement) 

Work-hours 

(include 

access, testing, 

and close-up) 

Labor 

cost 

(@$85/h

our) 

Parts Cost Total Costs 

(labor + 

parts) 

Number of 

U.S. 

Registered 

Products

Total Cost 

for U.S. Fleet 

Remove and install 

door latch fittings 

and witness mark 

placards

7 $ 595.00 $1365.00 $1,960.00 451 $883,960.00

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The known number of products in compliance: 

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $883,960 

Costs covered under warranty (if known) 

Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs): 

Executive Order 12866: 

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? 

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures: 

Is the AD significant? 

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act: 

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer.

YES NO 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska: 

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES* NO 

*Explanation: