alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 81 (Friday, April 27, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 21055]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-8062]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION

Information Security Oversight Office


National Industrial Security Program Policy Advisory Committee: 
Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. app 
2) and implementing regulation 41 CFR 101.6, announcement is made for 
the following committee meeting:

    Name of Committee: National Industrial Security Program Policy 
Advisory Committee (NISPPAC).
    Date of Meeting: May 16, 2007.
    Time of Meeting: 10 a.m.-12 noon.
    Place of Meeting: National Archives and Records Administration, 
700 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Archivist's Reception Room, Room 105, 
Washington, DC 20408.
    Purpose: To discuss National Industrial Security Program policy 
matters.
    This meeting will be open to the public. However, due to space 
limitations and access procedures, the name and telephone number of 
individuals planning to attend must be submitted to the Information 
Security Oversight Office (ISOO) no later than Thursday, April 26, 
2007. ISOO will provide additional instructions for gaining access 
to the location of the meeting.
    For Further Information Contact: Patrick Viscuso, Senior Program 
Analyst, Information Security Oversight Office, National Archives 
Building, 700 Pennsylvania Avenue, Washington, DC 20408, telephone 
number (202) 387-5313.
    Supplementary Information:
Agenda
    (1) Industry Presentation;
    (2) NISP Signatory Update; and
    (3) General Open Forum.

    Dated: April 23, 2007.
Mary Ann Hadyka,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. E7-8062 Filed 4-26-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7515-01-P
No. 55497.

#### Mutual Buying Syndicate, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 156042-K (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protest.
#### Dennis N. PIXTON, Plaintiff-Cross Appellant, v. B & B PLASTICS, INC. (doing business as Gambler), Defendant-Appellant, and Michael Surman and Joan Bringger (as personal representatives of the estate of Jack Russell Bringger, III), Defendants.

No. 04-1544, 04-1579.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Aug. 31, 2005.

Before MICHEL, Chief Judge, NEWMAN and SCHALL, Circuit Judges.

*ORDER*

NEWMAN, Circuit Judge.

We consider whether 04-1544 and 04-1579 should be dismissed.

On August 13, 2004, B & B Plastics, Inc. appealed the July 12, 2004 judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida in *Pixton v. B & B Plastics, Inc.,*No. 99-CF-6360 (S.D.Fla. July 12, 2004). B & B Plastics’ appeal was docketed as 04-1544. On September 1, 2004, Dennis N. Pixton filed a notice of appeal seeking review of the same district court decision. Pixton’s appeal was docketed as 04-1579. However, no one has entered an appearance for Pixton. On January 5, 2005 we stayed briefing after being notified that B & B Plastics had filed a petition in bankruptcy and thus the automatic stay provision of 11 U.S.C. § 362 was applicable.

On June 15, 2005, we informed Pixton that if no one entered an appearance on his behalf within 30 days we would dismiss his appeal. Pixton has not responded and no entry of appearance has been received on Pixton’s behalf. Thus, 04-1579 is dismissed.

We determine that the appropriate course with respect to B & B Plastics’ appeal, 04-1544, is to dismiss pursuant to Fed. Cir. R. 47.10 (if appeal is subject to bankruptcy stay, clerk may dismiss without prejudice to reinstatement within *30*days after lifting of bankruptcy stay).

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) 04-1579 is dismissed.

(2) 04-1544 is dismissed without prejudice to reinstatement pursuant to the terms of Fed. Cir. R. 47.10.

(3) Each side shall bear its own costs.

(4) All pending motions are moot.
# ARTICLES OF
AMENDMENT

# TO THEARTICLES
OF INCORPORATION

Pursuant to the
provisions of the Colorado Business Corporation Act, the undersigned corporation
adopts the following Articles of Amendment to its Articles of Incorporation:

FIRST:  The name of the
corporation is CENTENNIAL BANC SHARE CORP.

SECOND: The following
amendment to the Articles of Incorporation was adopted on June 20, 2000, as
prescribed by the Colorado Business Corporation Act. Such amendment was adopted
by a vote of the shareholders. The number of shares voted for the amendment was
sufficient for approval

RESOLVED:  The name of the
corporation is: easyQual.com, Inc.

THIRD:  The manner, if not
set  forth  in such  amendment,  in which  any  exchange,  reclassification,  or
cancellation  of issued shares  provided for in the amendment shall be effected,
is as follows:   None

This amendment
is effective immediately.

CENTENNIAL BANC SHARE CORP.

By///signed///
             Its
President
No. 49413.

#### Protests 929306-G, etc., of S. M. Hexter & Co. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
No. 39080.

#### Protests 445742-G, etc., of M. Liotta, Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

The record established that certain items consist of articles in chief value of cellulose filaments similar to those involved in Abstract 37230. The claim at 60 percent under paragraph 31 was therefore sustained.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000

<S>                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                        9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                    APR-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                         JAN-31-1999
<CASH>                                        (3)
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                476
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (50)
<INVENTORY>                                  109
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             651
<PP&E>                                       305
<DEPRECIATION>                               289
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               670
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      2,234
<BONDS>                                        0
<COMMON>                                     852
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                                 2,416
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 670
<SALES>                                    1,263
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           1,743
<CGS>                                      1,326
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              1,326
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             758
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            23
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (364)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (364)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                (364)
<EPS-BASIC>                               (.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                               (.06)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER
30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          26,232
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  254,232
<ALLOWANCES>                                     9,915
<INVENTORY>                                    134,913
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               430,366
<PP&E>                                         565,248
<DEPRECIATION>                               (239,001)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,040,215
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          171,783
<BONDS>                                        112,087
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           959
<OTHER-SE>                                     710,349
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,040,215
<SALES>                                        329,004
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               620,989
<CGS>                                          214,574
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  445,105
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,320
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,089
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,275
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 22,032
<INCOME-TAX>                                    15,042
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,990
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,990
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.07

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES/OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the report of Medical Solutions Management Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 29, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), the undersigned Brian Lesperance, President and Treasurer (principal executive officer and acting
principal accounting and finance officer) of the Company hereby certify, pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, that this Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 or other document authenticating,
acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906 Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|                        |  |                                                                                  
|----------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: November 19, 2007 |  |                                                                                  
|                        |  | /s/ Brian Lesperance                                                             
|                        |  | Brian Lesperance                                                                 
|                        |  | President and Treasurer                                                          
|                        |  | (principal executive officer and acting principal accounting and finance officer)
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED OCTOBER 17, 2014

NO. 03-14-00204-CR

The State of Texas, Appellant

v.

Robert Andrew Johnson, Appellee

APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, PEMBERTON, AND FIELD

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION -- OPINION BY JUSTICE FIELD

This is an appeal from the order granting a motion to quash signed by the trial court. Having 

reviewed the record, the Court holds that The State of Texas has not prosecuted its appeal and 

did not comply with a notice from the Clerk of this Court. Therefore, the Court dismisses the 

appeal for want of prosecution. The State of Texas shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both 

in this Court and the court below.
# C_2016136EN.01000701.xml

| 18.4.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 136/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.4.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 136/7

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per la Lombardia (Italy) lodged on 31 December 2015 — Malpensa Logistica Europa SpA v SEA — Società Esercizi Aeroportuali SpA

(Case C-701/15)

(2016/C 136/11)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per la Lombardia

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Malpensa Logistica Europa SpA

Applicant:

Defendant: SEA — Società Esercizi Aeroportuali SpA

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Does Article 7 of Directive 2004/17/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 coordinating the procurement procedures of entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors (1), which requires the application of the EU rules governing the award of public contracts to activities relating to the exploitation of a geographical area for the purpose of the provision of airports to air carriers, as defined in the national case-law referred to in paragraphs 6.4 and 6.5 above, preclude national provisions, such as those set out in Articles 4 and 11 of Legislative Decree No 18/1999, which do not require a prior public selection procedure to be conducted for every allocation, including temporary allocations, of areas within airports for the purpose of such activities?

1

---

(1)  Directive 2004/17/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 coordinating the procurement procedures of entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors (OJ 2004 L 134, p. 1).

1

---
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Commercial Mortgage  Servicing**D1050-084, 8th Fl  401 South Tryon Street  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|--------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

 

Reference is hereby made tothat certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of April 1, 2016, by andamong CITIGROUP COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES INC, as Depositor, WELLS FARGOBANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, C-III ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC, asSpecial Servicer, PARK BRIDGE LENDER SERVICES LLC, as Operating Advisor andAsset Representations Reviewer, CITIBANK, N.A., as Certificate Administratorand WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee with respect toCommercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2016-P3 (the"Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise definedshall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 10.08 ofthis Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of CommercialMortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1. A review of the activitiesof the Master Servicer during the period from April 1, 2016 through December31, 2016 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance per theAgreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and 

 

2. To the best of myknowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of itsobligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, theundersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2017.

 

 

/s/ Daniel Bober 

Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President 

Wells Fargo Bank 

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll  go far |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------|
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service

Atlantic Flyway
Exhibit 35.1

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2016-1 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018, (the Report), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Santander Consumer USA Inc. (the Servicer), does hereby certify and
represent that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities and performance of the Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of
February 17, 2016, among Santander Drive Auto Receivables LLC, Santander Consumer USA Inc., Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2016-1 and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (the
Agreement) during the period that is the subject of the Report has been made under my supervision.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the
Agreement in all material respects throughout the period that is the subject of the Report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



SANTANDER CONSUMER USA
INC.


By:

/s/ Sandra M. Broderick


Name: Sandra M. BroderickTitle: EVP Head of OperationsDate: March 29,
2019


By:

/s/ Andrew Kang


Name: Andrew KangTitle: TreasurerDate: March 29, 2019
1Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_______________________

No. 97-30265

Summary Calendar

_______________________

OLIVER JAMES, Individually and on Behalf of the Estate of Joe

James,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

PRIMERICA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

Defendant-Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Middle District of Louisiana

Baton Rouge Division

(96-CV-138-B-M2)

_________________________________________________________________

December 11, 1997

Before JONES, SMITH and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:1

Plaintiff Oliver James, individually and on behalf of the

estate of his uncle, Joe James (“James”), brings this suit

against Primerica Life Insurance Company for breach of a life

insurance contract. James filled out an application for life

insurance and tendered the required premium in March 1995 and,

after the insurer rejected the application because Oliver James
2

lacked the required insurable interest to be listed as the owner,

again in June 1995. In both applications, James indicated that

he had not been diagnosed with cancer and had not been

hospitalized within the last ten years. In fact, James had been

diagnosed with and hospitalized for rectal cancer at least since

January 1995. He had been released from a week’s stay in the

hospital the day before he signed the second application. James

died of cancer on August 31, 1995. A policy had not yet been

issued because of delays in arranging for an inspection report

and paramedical examination of James. However, Oliver James

filed a claim under the application’s Conditional Premium Receipt

provision, which covered death prior to delivery of the policy. 

Primerica denied coverage and returned the premiums because

James’s certified medical records revealed his diagnosis of

cancer, and one of the express terms of the interim coverage was

that all representations on the policy were true. Interim

coverage also required that the applicant qualify as a “standard

risk” under the policy applied for, and undisputed evidence

indicates that James was not an acceptable insurance risk.

The district court granted summary judgment in favor of

Primerica on the grounds that any coverage was void because James

intentionally misrepresented the status of his health on his

application for life insurance. Plaintiff alleges that the
3

district court erred in granting summary judgment because

material fact issues still exist as to James’s intent to deceive

the insurer. Having reviewed the briefs, record and relevant

authority, we find no reason to reverse the summary judgment

granted by the district court. 

AFFIRMED.
#### Steven E. ROUSSEAU, Appellant, v. GOODWILL/EASTERSEALS, Appellee.

No. 05-1799.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 2, 2005.

Decided Sept. 22, 2005.

Steven E. Rousseau, St. Peters, MN, pro se.

David Jordan-Huffman, Oppenheimer & Wolff, Minneapolis, MN, for Appellee.

Before MURPHY, COLLOTON, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Steven Rousseau appeals the grant of defendant’s motion to dismiss in his race-discrimination action. The district court1 concluded that Rousseau’s complaint was barred by res judicata. Upon careful review of the record, we agree, for the reasons explained by the district court. Accordingly, we affirm. *See*8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Richard H. Kyle, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota.