alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 379 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 379

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That when the House adjourns on the legislative day of Thursday, June 
26, 2008, or Friday, June 27, 2008, on a motion offered pursuant to 
this concurrent resolution by its Majority Leader or his designee, it 
stand adjourned until 2 p.m. on Tuesday, July 8, 2008, or until the 
time of any reassembly pursuant to

              

 section 2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first; and 
that when the Senate recesses or adjourns on any day from Thursday, 
June 26, 2008, through Friday, July 4, 2008, on a motion offered 
pursuant to this concurrent resolution by its Majority Leader or his 
designee, it stand recessed or adjourned until noon on Monday, July 7, 
2008, or such other time on that day as may be specified in the motion 
to recess or adjourn, or until the time of any reassembly pursuant to 
section 2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first.
    Sec. 2.  The Speaker of the House and the Majority Leader of the 
Senate, or their respective designees, acting jointly after 
consultation with the Minority Leader of the House and the Minority 
Leader of the Senate, shall notify the Members of the House and the 
Senate, respectively, to reassemble at such place and time as they may 
designate if, in their opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 24, 2008.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
110th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                            H. CON. RES. 379

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Providing for a conditional adjournment of the House of Representatives 
         and a conditional recess or adjournment of the Senate.
```
Exhibit 11

                             BNP U.S. FUNDING L.L.C.
                             -----------------------

                       Computation of net income per share
                      (in thousands, except per share data)

                                                               Twelve-month
                                                               period ended
                                                             December 31, 2001
                                                             -----------------

Net Income                                                        $ 52,277
Less:  Preferred Securities Dividend Requirement
Net Income (Loss) Applicable to Common Securities                   38,690
                                                                    ------
                                                                  $ 13,587
                                                                    ======
Securities:
Weighted Average Number of Common Securities                        53,011
Outstanding                                                         ======

Net Income (Loss) per Common Security                             $ 256.31
                                                                    ======
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.21

                                AMENDMENT NO. 2
                        NATIONAL COMMERCE BANCORPORATION
                    1994 STOCK PLAN, AS AMENDED AND RESTATED
                        EFFECTIVE AS OF NOVEMBER 1, 1996

The National Commerce Bancorporation 1994 Stock Plan, as amended and restated
effective as of November 1, 1996, as further amended as of July 1, 1998 by
Amendment Number One (collectively, the "Plan"), is hereby further amended as
follows:

1.  Section 7.1 of the Plan is hereby amended to read as follows:

    7.1  Committee Action. The Committee acting in its absolute discretion shall
         have the right to grant Options to Key Employees under this Plan from
         time to time to purchaser shares of Stock; provided, however, that (1)
         no grants of ISOs shall be made to Key Employees who are not employed
         by NCBC or a Subsidiary and (2) the number of shares of Stock subject
         to Options granted to a Key Employee during any calendar year shall not
         exceed 200,000 shares each calendar year unless the Key Employee is
         NCBC's Chief Executive Officer or Chairman of NCBC's Board of
         Directors, in which event such number shall not exceed 400,000 shares
         each calendar year. Each grant of an Option to a Key Employee shall be
         evidenced by an Option Agreement, and each Option Agreement shall set
         forth whether the Option is an ISO or a NQO and shall set forth such
         other terms and conditions of such grant as the Committee acting in its
         absolute discretion deems consistent with the terms of this Plan.
         However, if the Committee grants an ISO and a NQO to a Key Employee on
         the same date, the right of the Key Employee to exercise or surrender
         one such Option shall not be conditioned on his or her failure to
         exercise or surrender the other such Option. The Committee shall have
         the right to grant a NQO and Restricted Stock to a key Employee at the
         same time and to condition the exercise of the NQO on the forfeiture of
         the Restricted Stock grant. Finally, the 200,000 and 400,000 share
         grant caps set forth in this (S) 7.1 shall not apply to an Option
         granted to an individual not previously employed by NCBC to induce the
         individual to become an employee of NCBC.

     In all other respects, the 1994 Stock Plan, as amended and restated
effective as of November 1, 1996, as further amended by Amendment Number One
effective July 1, 1998, shall remain in full force and effect.  This Amendment
No. 2 is effective as of June 29, 2000 after due approval of the shareholders of
National Commerce Bancorporation.

                                        NATIONAL COMMERCE
                                        BANCORPORATION


                                        By:_______________________________
----

----

II Acts whose publication is not obligatory

Commission

----

            COMMISSION DECISION         

of 7 December 2004         

adopting, pursuant to Council Directive 92/43/EEC, the list of sites of Community importance for the Atlantic biogeographical region

(notified under document number C(2004) 4032)

(2004/813/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora (1), and in particular the third subparagraph of Article 4(2) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The list contained in Annex 1 to this Decision shall constitute the initial list of sites of Community importance for the Atlantic biogeographical region in accordance with the third subparagraph of Article 4(2) of Directive 92/43/EEC.

That list is to be revised in the light of further proposals by Member States in conformity with Article 4 of Directive 92/43/EEC for certain habitat types and species, specified in Annex 2 and in Annex 3 to this decision.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 7 December 2004.

For the Commission

Stavros DIMAS            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 206, 22.7.1992, p. 7. Directive as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1882/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 284, 31.10.2003, p. 1).

(2)OJ L 107, 24.4.1997, p. 1.

(3)  Judgment of 11 September 2001, Case C-71/99 Commission v Germany [2001] ECR. I-5811, points 27 and 28

----

ANNEX 1

Initial list of sites of Community importance for the Atlantic biogeographical region

Each site of Community importance (SCI) is identified by the information supplied in the Natura 2000 format, including the corresponding map. This has been transmitted by the competent national authorities in accordance with the second subparagraph of Article 4(1) (except for those habitat types and species listed in Annex 2 to this decision).

The table below gives the following information:

All the information given in the Community list below is based on the data proposed, transmitted and validated by Belgium, Germany, Denmark, Spain, France, Ireland, the Netherlands, Portugal and the United Kingdom.

----

ANNEX 2

List of habitat types and species, for which it cannot be concluded that the network is complete

----

(1)

----

ANNEX 3

List of habitat types and species for which it cannot be concluded that the network is either complete or incomplete

(A)   Marine habitat types/species requiring further clarification

(B)   Habitat type/species subject to scientific examination

----

(1)

----
Exhibit
32.2











CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350)








In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Walgreen Co., an Illinois corporation
(the "Company"), on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended May 31, 2008 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Wade D. Miquelon,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.














/s/ Wade D.
Miquelon


Wade D.
Miquelon


Chief
Financial Officer


Dated:  July
1, 2008





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Walgreen Co. and will be retained by Walgreen Co. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
(Reap. Dec. 9889)

#### Hudson Shipping Co., Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 800948.

(Decided April 8, 1959)

Plaintiff not represented by counsel.

*George Cochran Dowd,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Lawrence, Judge:

When this appeal for a reappraisement was called for hearing, there was no appearance on behalf of plaintiff.

An examination of the official record discloses no reason for disturbing the presumptively correct value for the merchandise found by the appraiser.

I, therefore, find and hold the proper dutiable value of the merchandise covered by this appeal to be the value found by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
```

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 242 (Friday, December 17, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 79070]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-31718]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary

Notice of Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience and 
Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits Filed Under Subpart B 
(Formerly Subpart Q) During the Week Ending November 6, 2010

    The following Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience 
and Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits were filed under Subpart 
B (formerly Subpart Q) of the Department of Transportation's Procedural 
Regulations (See 14 CFR 301.201 et seq.). The due date for Answers, 
Conforming Applications, or Motions To Modify Scope are set forth below 
for each application. Following the Answer period DOT may process the 
application by expedited procedures. Such procedures may consist of the 
adoption of a show-cause order, a tentative order, or in appropriate 
cases a final order without further proceedings.
    Docket Number: DOT-OST-2010-0276.
    Date Filed: November 5, 2010.
    Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion To Modify 
Scope: November 26, 2010.
    Description: Application of Volga-Dnepr Airlines LLC requesting a 
foreign air carrier permit to engage in charter foreign air 
transportation of property and mail between any point or points in the 
Russian Federation and any point or points in the United States and 
other all cargo charters.

Renee V. Wright,
Program Manager, Docket Operations, Federal Register Liaison.
[FR Doc. 2010-31718 Filed 12-16-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P
```
#### I. Freeman & Son, Inc. *v.*United States

No. 6469.

Entry No. 703300/1.

Invoice dated London, England, June 30, 1942.

Certified June 30, 1942.

Entered at New York, N. Y., August 11, 1942.

(Decided October 28, 1946)

*Ooldwaler é Flynn*for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Moeuson, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section -402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of thé merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
Exhibit 12.2


I, Yoram Bibring, certify that :

1.    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Fundtech Ltd.;

2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
      of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
      were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
      report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
      information included in this report, fairly present in all material
      respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
      the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.    The company's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
      establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
      defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and
      have:

      a.    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
            disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
            supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
            company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
            us by others within those entities, particularly during the period
            in which this report is being prepared;

      b.    Evaluated the effectiveness of the company's disclosure controls and
            procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
            effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the
            end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
            and

      c.    Disclosed in this report any change in the company's internal
            control over financial reporting that occurred during the period
            covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is
            reasonably likely to materially affect, the company's internal
            control over financial reporting; and

5.    The company's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
      our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
      to the company's auditors and the audit committee of the company's board
      of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

      a.    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
            or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
            reasonably likely to adversely affect the company's ability to
            record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

      b.    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
            other employees who have a significant role in the company's
            internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  May 27, 2005


By: /s/ Yoram Bibring
   ------------------------------
   Yoram Bibring
   Chief Financial Officer
# C_2016068EN.01004602.xml

| 22.2.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 68/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.2.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 68/46

---

Action brought on 21 December 2015 — ZZ v Commission

(Case F-149/15)

(2016/C 068/60)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: L. Levi, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Application for annulment of the decision imposing on the applicant the penalty of deferment of advancement to a higher step and obliging the applicant to pay compensation in respect of harm allegedly incurred by the European Union, and an application for compensation in respect of the non-material harm and the reputational damage allegedly incurred.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Tribunal should:

| — | annul Decision CMS 13-005 of the Tripartite appointing authority in so far as it provides for deferment of the applicant’s advancement to a higher step for 18 months and payment of compensation in respect of harm assessed by the decision at EUR 108 596,35; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul Decision CMS 13-005 of the Tripartite appointing authority in so far as it provides for deferment of the applicant’s advancement to a higher step for 18 months and payment of compensation in respect of harm assessed by the decision at EUR 108 596,35;

| — | so far as necessary, annul the decision rejecting the applicant’s complaint; |
| --- | --- |

—

so far as necessary, annul the decision rejecting the applicant’s complaint;

| — | in the alternative, reduce the financial penalty contained in Decision CMS 13-005; |
| --- | --- |

—

in the alternative, reduce the financial penalty contained in Decision CMS 13-005;

| — | order the defendant to pay compensation in respect of the non-material harm and reputational damage incurred by the applicant assessed at EUR 20 000; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay compensation in respect of the non-material harm and reputational damage incurred by the applicant assessed at EUR 20 000;

| — | order the defendant to pay all the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay all the costs.

---
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsSupersonic Inlet Test for a Quiet Supersonic Transport Technology Demonstrator in the NASA Glenn 8- by 6-Foot Supersonic Wind TunnelNASA funded the preliminary design of a flight demonstrator aircraft with a greatly reduced sonic boom signature to enable supersonic flight over land. In 2017, two tests were performed at the NASA Glenn Research Center 8- by 6-foot Supersonic Wind Tunnel, an aerodynamic stability/control test and an inlet performance test. The inlet was unique due to the location on the vehicle, located on the top centerline near the rear of the aircraft. Test data provided a validation and performance dataset for engine integration on the demonstrator vehicle. The subject of this report is the subsonic and supersonic performance data collected for the centerline top-mounted inlet.Document ID20180006432Acquisition SourceGlenn Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsCastner, Raymond*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Simerly, Stephanie*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Rankin, Michael*(Lockheed Martin Corp. Palmdale, CA, United States)*Date AcquiredOctober 18, 2018Publication DateAugust 1, 2018Subject CategoryAeronautics (General)Report/Patent NumberAIAA Paper 2018-2850NASA/TM-2018-219956E-19567GRC-E-DAA-TN59194Meeting InformationMeeting: AIAA Space ForumLocation: Atlanta, GACountry: United StatesStart Date: June 25, 2018End Date: June 29, 2018Sponsors:American Inst. of Aeronautics and AstronauticsFunding Number(s)WBS: WBS 339442.04.03Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightPublic Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20180006432.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.60


                              SEVENTH AMENDMENT TO
                 DYNEGY INC. PROFIT SHARING/401(K) SAVINGS PLAN


         WHEREAS, Dynegy Inc. (the "Company") and other Employers have
heretofore adopted the Dynegy Inc. Profit Sharing/401(k) Savings Plan (the
"Plan") for the benefit of their eligible employees; and

         WHEREAS, the Company amended and restated the Plan on behalf of itself
and the other Employers, effective as of January 1, 1998; and

         WHEREAS, the Company desires to further amend the Plan on behalf of
itself and the other Employers;

         NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan shall be amended as follows, effective as of
January ____, 2000:

         1.       Section 10.5 of the Plan shall be amended by adding the
following sentences to the end of such Section:

         "Notwithstanding the foregoing or any other provision in the Plan to
         the contrary, the Eligible Rollover Distribution of a DOCC Member (as
         hereinafter defined) may, at the election of such DOCC Member, include
         any outstanding loan from the Plan to such DOCC Member provided that
         (A) no portion of such loan is funded from such DOCC Member's After-Tax
         Account, (B) the Eligible Retirement Plan that will receive such
         Eligible Rollover Distribution (or the portion thereof that includes
         any such loan) is maintained by El Paso Energy Corporation or an
         affiliate thereof, (C) such Eligible Retirement Plan will accept such
         Eligible Rollover Distribution (including such loan), and (D) such DOCC
         Member's election to have such Eligible Rollover Distribution
         (including such loan) paid directly to such Eligible Retirement Plan is
         made prior to June 1, 2000, in the manner prescribed by the Committee.
         A 'DOCC Member' means each Member who was employed by Dynegy Operating
         Company California, Inc. at the time of the sale of such corporation to
         El Paso Energy Corporation or an affiliate thereof."

         2.       As amended hereby, the Plan is specifically ratified and
reaffirmed.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused these presents to be
executed this _____ day of January, 2000.

                                               DYNEGY INC.


                                               BY:
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  NAME:
                                                       -------------------------
                                                  TITLE:
                                                       -------------------------