alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site.(Historical purposes)
**Title:****Chronic diseases and their riskfactors [electronic resource].**
 
1998 | 1999
 
SuDoc:HE 20.7619:
Item Number:0494-H-11 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000551788
 
October 24, 2017
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 86 (Friday, May 4, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 25325-25326]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-8514]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[FEMA-3275-EM]


Iowa; Amendment No. 2 to Notice of an Emergency Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of an emergency declaration for 
the State of Iowa (FEMA-3275-EM), dated March 30, 2007, and related 
determinations.

DATES: Effective Date: April 24, 2007.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Magda Ruiz, Disaster Assistance 
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, 
(202) 646-2705.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of an emergency declaration for 
the

[[Page 25326]]

State of Iowa is hereby amended to include the following areas among 
those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the 
catastrophe declared an emergency by the President in his declaration 
of March 30, 2007:

    Dickinson, Plymouth, and Woodbury Counties for emergency 
protective measures (Category B), including snow removal, under the 
Public Assistance program for any continuous 48-hour period during 
or proximate to the incident period.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community 
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund Program; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services Program; 97.034, 
Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management 
Assistance; 97.048, Individuals and Households Housing; 97.049, 
Individuals and Households Disaster Housing Operations; 97.050, 
Individuals and Households Program--Other Needs, 97.036, Public 
Assistance Grants; 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.)

R. David Paulison,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
 [FR Doc. E7-8514 Filed 5-3-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-10-P
Exhibit 32.2  
 **Certification**
 
 **Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**
 **(Subsections
(a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States
Code)**
  Pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), the
undersigned officer of SonomaWest Holdings, Inc., a California corporation (the
" Company "), does
hereby certify that to his knowledge:
  The
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 (the
" Form
10-Q ") of the
Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
   Dated: May 12,
2005
 
 
 /s/
Thomas R. Eakin
 Thomas R.
Eakin
 Chief
Financial Officer
  A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
SonomaWest Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by SonomaWest Holdings, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
   -24-
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 186 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 25, 2007 

Received and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Honoring the 75th anniversary of Brookgreen Gardens in 

Murrells Inlet, South Carolina. 

Whereas 2007 is the 75th year that Brookgreen Gardens is 

open to the public; 

Whereas in 1930 philanthropist Archer M. Huntington and 

his wife, sculptor Anna Hyatt Huntington, purchased 

9,100 acres of South Carolina land that stretched from 

the Waccamaw River to the Atlantic Ocean; 


hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS
2 

HCON 186 RFS 

Whereas within the tract of such land were the remnants of 

four rice plantations, including the Oaks, Springfield, 

Laurel Hill, and Brookgreen; 

Whereas the Huntingtons created Brookgreen Gardens on a 

300-acre parcel of land with massive live oak trees which 

were planted nearly two centuries earlier; 

Whereas in 1932 the Huntingtons opened Brookgreen Gardens to the public and established it as both a nature 

preserve and a showcase for American figurative sculpture; 

Whereas Brookgreen Gardens consists of two main components: the Huntington Sculpture Garden and the 

Lowcountry History and Wildlife Preserve; 

Whereas more than 550 works by hundreds of American artists are displayed in the Huntington Sculpture Garden; 

Whereas the Lowcountry History and Wildlife Preserve is 

rich with evidence of the great rice plantations of the 

1800s, contains native and domestic animal exhibits, and 

is the only zoo accredited by the Association of Zoos and 

Aquariums on the coast of either North Carolina or 

South Carolina; and 

Whereas Brookgreen Gardens is designated a National Historic Landmark by the National Park Service: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That Congress honors Brookgreen Gardens 


hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS
3 

HCON 186 RFS 

1 in Murrells Inlet, South Carolina, on its 75th anniversary 

2 of being open to the public. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 24, 

2007. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 


hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS
No. 53245.

#### Comex Wine & Spirits, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 140162-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 346 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 346

  Expressing the sense of Congress that American oil companies should 
   build additional refining capacity on existing refinery campuses.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 8, 2008

Mr. Alexander submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
            referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
  Expressing the sense of Congress that American oil companies should 
   build additional refining capacity on existing refinery campuses.

Whereas gasoline prices are currently approaching $4.00 per gallon in the United 
        States;
Whereas there is a known shortage of refinery capacity in the United States and 
        we are unable to process enough supply of gasoline to meet the Nation's 
        demand;
Whereas the United States is forced to import over 10,000,000 barrels of crude 
        oil each day;
Whereas crude oil prices are currently at $120 per barrel with no drop in that 
        price in the foreseeable future;
Whereas the profits of American oil companies are reaching record highs;
Whereas no new refineries have been built in the United States since 1976 and 
        over 170 refineries have stopped operation since then;
Whereas a stable, steady oil supply and United States refining capacity is a 
        national security issue; and
Whereas current refinery capacity is stretched to its limits: Now, therefore, be 
        it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of Congress that American oil companies should 
reinvest their profits into building additional refining capacity on 
existing refinery campuses so that the United States will become 
independent of foreign refineries and, in effect, to help to reduce the 
current high price of gasoline.
                                 <all>
```
#### Genoveva RODRIGUEZ-FLORES, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 03-73116.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 12, 2005.*

Decided Sept. 27, 2005.

Richard L. Waldron, Esq., Richard L. Waldron Law Office, Anaheim, CA, for Petitioner.

Regional Counsel, Western Region Immigration *&*Naturalization Service, Laguna Niguel, CA, Ronald E. Lefevre, Chief Legal Officer, Office of The District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Aviva L. Poczter, Esq., DOJ—U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Div./Office Of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: REINHARDT, RYMER, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Genoveva Rodriguez-Flores, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s denial of her motion to reopen removal proceedings held in absentia. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review the BIA’s denial of a motion to reopen for abuse of discretion, and we review due process claims de novo. *Reyes v. Ashcroft,*358 F.3d 592, 595 (9th Cir.2004). We deny the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in affirming the denial of Rodriguez-Flores’s motion to reopen based on ineffective assistance of counsel because even if she had complied with the requirements set forth in *Matter of Lozada,*19 I. & N. Dec. 637, 639 (BIA 1988), *see Reyes,*358 F.3d at 597, *909her claim would nevertheless fail because she did not demonstrate that the allegedly deficient representation affected the outcome of the proceedings. *See Iturribarria v. INS,*321 F.3d 889, 900 (9th Cir.2003) (concluding that an alien could not establish prejudice where he failed to demonstrate the requisite hardship to qualify for relief). Because Rodriguez-Flores did not provide evidence to establish that she qualified for either cancellation of removal or voluntary departure, the BIA did not abuse its discretion in concluding that the petitioner was not prejudiced by any ineffective assistance of counsel. *See Lata,*204 F.3d at 1246 (holding that a petitioner must show “error and substantial prejudice” to prevail on an ineffective assistance of counsel claim).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
# Title

# Summary

# Total, Dissolved Nutrients

# Chlorophyll

# BOD
Order filed, April 13, 2021

.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14

- 20

- 00822

- CV

____________

LETNER SURVIVORS TRUST, LLC , Appellant

V.

THE BERRY GROUP, LP , Appellee

On Appeal from the 333rd District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2015

- 70328



### ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due February 1, 2021. See Tex. R.

App. P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the

record. The record has not been filed with the cour t. Because the reporter’s record

has not been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Michelle Miller , the official court reporter, to file the record in this

appeal within 30 days of the date of this order

.

PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Justices Jewe l l, Bourliot , and Hassan.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE
QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                       2,027,486
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   19,747
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    232,556
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,810,045
<PP&E>                                       9,334,086
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,804,765
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              23,464,221
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,044,082
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        32,494
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                23,464,221
<SALES>                                      1,449,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,949,132
<CGS>                                          819,489
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  819,489
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,679,158
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              32,752
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,582,267)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,582,267)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.49)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.49)
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 5787] 

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                         *et seq.*; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note,                         *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236 of October 19, 1999, as amended, and Delegation of Authority No. 257 of April 15, 2003 [68 FR 19875], I hereby determine that the object to be included in the exhibition “Bar at the Folies-Bergere”, imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, is of cultural significance. The object is imported pursuant to a loan agreement with the foreign owner or custodian. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit object at the J. Paul Getty Museum, Los Angeles, California, from on or about June 5, 2007, until on or about September 9, 2007, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. Public Notice of these Determinations is ordered to be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        For further information contact Paul Manning, Attorney-Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (                        *telephone:*                         (202) 453-8050). The address is U.S. Department of State, SA-44, 301 4th Street, SW., Room 700, Washington, DC 20547-0001.                     

Dated: April 26, 2007. 

C. Miller Crouch, 

Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.

 [FR Doc. E7-8477 Filed 5-2-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1996
<CASH>                                             119
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,143
<ALLOWANCES>                                        83
<INVENTORY>                                        274
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,807
<PP&E>                                             247
<DEPRECIATION>                                     201
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,855
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,038
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           853
<OTHER-SE>                                     (1,061)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,855
<SALES>                                          5,368
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,368
<CGS>                                            4,931
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,931
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,179
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    58
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  14
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (812)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (812)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (812)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.13)
        

</TABLE>
#### American Shipping Co. *v.*United States

No. 6796.

Entry No. 712412.

Invoice dated London, England, August 20, 1945.

Certified August 1945.

Entered at New York, N. Y., September 26, 1945.

(Decided January 22, 1947)

*Goldwater & Flynn*for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Lawrence, Judge:

It has been agreed between the parties hereto that the issues herein relating to the above-mentioned merchandise are the same in all material respects as those decided in *United States*v. *Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp.,*33 C. C. P. A. (Customs) 183, C. A. D. 334, and that the record therein may be incorporated herein.

Upon the agreed facts I find the export value, as defined in section 402 (d), Tariff Act, of 1930, to be the proper basis for determining the value of said merchandise, and that such values are the appraised values, less additions made by importer on entries because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
No. 55507.

#### Clebar Watch Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 169677-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

It was stipulated that the items of merchandise marked “A” or “B” on the invoices consist of watch movements similar in all material respects to those which were the subject of *United States*v. *Helbros Watch Co. et al.*(38 C. C. P. A. 1, C. A. D. 430). Upon the agreed statement of facts *420and the cited authority, the items marked “A” were held properly dutiable at the base rate of 90 cents each as watch movements more than 1 inch but less than 1.77 inches wide, and the items marked "B” were held dutiable at $1.20 each as watch movements more than -Ko of 1 inch but not more than 1 inch wide under paragraph 367 (a) (1), as modified, *supra.*
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

                          Independent Auditors' Consent

The Board of Directors
Provant, Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(Nos. 333-53473, 333-62109, 333-72857, 333-86379, 333-37146, 333-37472,
333-58952, 333-58950, 333-83018 and 333-83020) on Form S-8 of Provant, Inc. of
our report dated October 14, 2002, with respect to the consolidated balance
sheets of Provant, Inc. as of June 30, 2002 and 2001, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for
each of the years in the three-year period ended June 30, 2002, and all related
financial statement schedules, which report appears in the June 30, 2002, annual
report on Form 10-K of Provant, Inc.

The report of KPMG LLP on the aforementioned consolidated financial statements
contains an explanatory paragraph that states that the Company is in default on
amounts outstanding under its credit facility, has a working capital deficit and
has incurred losses from operations in 2002, which raises substantial doubt
about the entity's ability to continue as a going concern. The consolidated
financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the
outcome of that uncertainty.

                                             /s/ KPMG LLP


Boston, Massachusetts
October 14, 2002