Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 86 / Friday, May 4, 2007 / Notices 25245 

1Mielar S.A. (Mielar) and Compania Apicola 

Argentina S.A. (CAA) were treated as a single entity 

in a prior segment of the proceeding. For the 

purposes of this review we continue to treat Mielar 

and CAA as a single entity (M ielar/CAA). 

if it determines it is not practicable to 

complete the review within the 

foregoing time period. 

The Department finds that it is not 

practicable to complete the preliminary 

results of the administrative review of 

folding metal tables and chairs from the 

PRC within this time limit because of 

the need for additional information 

prior to mandatory verifications. 

Therefore, in accordance with section 

751(a)(3)(A) of the Act, the Department 

is further extending the time period for 

completion of the preliminary results of 

this review by 30 days until June 30, 

2007. Because June 30, 2007, falls on a 

Saturday, the preliminary results will 

due on July 2, 2007, the next business 

day. 

This notice is published in 

accordance with sections 751(a)(3)(A) 

and 777(i) of the Act. 

Dated: April 30, 2007. 

Stephen J. Claeys, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. E7–8587 Filed 5–3–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

A–357–812 

Honey from Argentina: Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review and Determination Not to 

Revoke In Part 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On December 29, 2006, the 

Department of Commerce (the 

Department) published its preliminary 

results of the administrative review of 

the antidumping duty order on honey 

from Argentina. See Preliminary Results 

of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review and Intent Not to Revoke in Part, 

71 FR 78397 (December 29, 2006) 

(Preliminary Results). This 

administrative review covers three 1

firms, one of which, Seylinco, S.A. 

(Seylinco) was selected as a mandatory 

respondent. The period of review (POR) 

is December 1, 2004 to November 30, 

2005. Based on our analysis of 

comments received, the margins for the 

final results do not differ from the 

preliminary results. See Preliminary 

Results. 

EFFECTIVE DATE: May 4, 2007. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Maryanne Burke or Robert James, Office 

7, Import Administration, International 

Trade Administration, U.S. Department 

of Commerce, 14th Street and 

Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone; (202) 482–5604 or 

(202) 482–0649, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On December 29, 2006, the 

Department published its Preliminary 

Results of this antidumping duty 

administrative review of honey from 

Argentina for the period December 1, 

2004, to November 30, 2005. In response 

to the Department’s invitation to 

comment on the preliminary results, the 

American Honey Producers Association 

and the Sioux Honey Association 

(collectively, petitioners) and Seylinco 

filed their case briefs on January 29, 

2007. Seylinco and petitioners 

submitted their rebuttal briefs on 

February 5, 2007. In addition, the 

Department met separately with 

representatives for Seylinco, petitioners 

and the Embassy of Argentina to discuss 

the Preliminary Results. See Ex Parte 

Memoranda to the File, from Maryanne 

Burke dated March 6, 2007 and March 

19, 2007, on file in CRU in room B–099 

of the main Commerce building. 

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise covered by the order 

is honey from Argentina. The products 

covered are natural honey, artificial 

honey containing more than 50 percent 

natural honey by weight, preparations of 

natural honey containing more than 50 

percent natural honey by weight, and 

flavored honey. The subject 

merchandise includes all grades and 

colors of honey whether in liquid, 

creamed, comb, cut comb, or chunk 

form, and whether packaged for retail or 

in bulk form. The merchandise is 

currently classifiable under subheadings 

0409.00.00, 1702.90.90, and 2106.90.99 

of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of 

the United States (HTSUS). Although 

the HTSUS subheadings are provided 

for convenience and Customs purposes, 

the Department’s written description of 

the merchandise under this order is 

dispositive. 

Determination Not to Revoke in Part 

As discussed in the Preliminary 

Results at 78399, Seylinco requested 

that the Department revoke the order in 

regard to Seylinco pursuant to 19 CFR 

351.222 based on three consecutive zero 

margins. We preliminarily determined 

not to revoke the order with respect to 

Seylinco because it did not ship in 

commercial quantities during each of 

the three years forming the basis of its 

request. See id. For these final results, 

the Department has relied upon 

Seylinco’s sales activity during the 

2002–2003, 2003–2004, and 2004–2005 

PORs in making its decision with 

respect to Seylinco’s revocation request. 

Although Seylinco had three 

consecutive years of sales at not less 

than normal value (NV), Seylinco did 

not sell subject merchandise in 

commercial quantities in each of these 

three years forming the basis of the 

request for revocation. Thus, Seylinco is 

not eligible for consideration for 

revocation pursuant to 19 CFR 

351.222(d)(1). Accordingly, we have 

determined not to revoke the 

antidumping duty order with respect to 

Seylinco. See Comment 2 of the Issues 

and Decision Memorandum from 

Stephen J. Claeys, Deputy Assistant 

Secretary for Import Administration, to 

David M. Spooner, Assistant Secretary 

for Import Administration (Issues and 

Decision Memorandum) accompanying 

this notice. 

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised in the case and 

rebuttal briefs by parties to this 

administrative review are addressed in 

the Issues and Decision Memorandum. 

A list of issues addressed in the 

Decision Memorandum is appended to 

this notice. The Decision Memorandum 

is on file in the CRU and can be 

accessed directly on the web at http:// 

www.ita.doc.gov/. 

Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

Based on our analysis of comments 

received and findings at verification, we 

have made the following change in the 

margin calculation: 

• We revised the color characteristic 

(GRADET/U) in both the U.S. and 

third–country market sales listings 

to differentiate amongst the various 

colors of honey actually shipped, in 

accordance with our established 

model–matching criteria. 

Final Results of Review 

We determine that the following 

dumping margins exist for the period 

December 1, 2004 through November 

30, 2005. 

Manufacturer / Exporter 

Weighted Average 

Margin (percentage) 

Seylinco ........................ 0.00 

El Mana, S.A. ............... 0.00 


cprice-sewell on DSK89S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
25246 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 86 / Friday, May 4, 2007 / Notices 

Manufacturer / Exporter 

Weighted Average 

Margin (percentage) 

Mielar/CAA .................... 0.00 

Assessment 

The Department shall determine, and 

the Customs and Border Protection 

(CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties 

on all appropriate entries. In accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), we have 

calculated a zero margin rate which will 

be applied uniformly on all Seylinco, El 

Mana S.A. and Mielar/CAA entries 

made during the POR. The Department 

intends to issue assessment instructions 

directly to CBP 15 days after the date of 

publication of these final results of 

review. We will direct CBP to liquidate 

without regard to antidumping duties. 

The Department clarified its 

‘‘automatic assessment’’ regulation on 

May 6, 2003 (68 FR 23954). This 

clarification will apply to entries of 

subject merchandise during the POR 

produced by companies included in 

these final results of review for which 

the reviewed companies did not know 

their merchandise was destined for the 

United States. In such instances, we will 

instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed 

entries at the all–others rate if there is 

no rate for the intermediate 

company(ies) involved in the 

transaction. For a full discussion of this 

clarification, see Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Proceedings: 

Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 

FR 23954 (May 6, 2003). 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective upon 

publication of the final results of this 

administrative review for all shipments 

of the subject merchandise entered, or 

withdrawn from warehouse, for 

consumption on or after the publication 

date, consistent with section 751(a)(1) of 

the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the 

Tariff Act): (1) cash deposits for 

Seylinco, El Mana S.A. and Mielar/CAA 

will not be required; (2) if the exporter 

is not a firm covered in this review, but 

was covered in a previous review or the 

original less than fair value (LTFV) 

investigation, the cash deposit rate will 

continue to be the company–specific 

rate published for the most recent 

period; (3) if the exporter is not a firm 

covered in this review, a prior review, 

or the original LTFV investigation, but 

the manufacturer is, the cash deposit 

rate will be the rate established for the 

most recent period for the manufacturer 

of the merchandise; and (4) if neither 

the exporter nor the manufacturer is a 

firm covered in this or any previous 

review conducted by the Department, 

the cash deposit rate will continue to be 

30.24 percent, which is the ‘‘All Others’’ 

rate established in the LTFV 

investigation. See Notice of 

Antidumping Duty Order; Honey From 

Argentina, 66 FR 63672 (December 10, 

2001). These deposit requirements, 

when imposed, shall remain in effect 

until publication of the final results of 

the next administrative review. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

This notice also serves as a final 

reminder to importers of their 

responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) 

to file a certificate regarding the 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

prior to liquidation of the relevant 

entries during this review period. 

Failure to comply with this requirement 

could result in the Secretary’s 

presumption that reimbursement of 

antidumping duties occurred and the 

subsequent assessment of doubled 

antidumping duties. 

This notice also serves as a reminder 

to parties subject to administrative 

protective orders (APO) of their 

responsibility concerning the return or 

destruction of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues 

to govern business proprietary 

information in this segment of the 

proceeding. Timely written notification 

of the return/destruction of APO 

materials or conversion to judicial 

protective order is hereby requested. 

Failure to comply with the regulations 

and terms of an APO is a violation, 

which is subject to sanction. 

We are issuing and publishing this 

determination and notice in accordance 

with sections section 751(a)(1) and 

777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act. 

Dated: April 27, 2007. 

David M. Spooner, 

Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration. 

Appendix – Issues and Decision 

Memorandum 

1. Whether to Apply Adverse Facts 

Available as a Result of Seylinco’s 

Reported Grade/Color 

2. Revocation 

3. Adverse Facts Available for 

Beekeeper 2 

4. Beekeeper Feed Costs 

5. Beekeeper Drums Costs 

[FR Doc. E7–8584 Filed 5–3–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

A–570–851 

Certain Preserved Mushrooms from 

the People’s Republic of China: Notice 

of Rescission of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On March 28, 2007, the 

Department of Commerce 

(‘‘Department’’) initiated the 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on certain 

preserved mushrooms from the People’s 

Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’) covering the 

period of review from February 1, 2006, 

through January 31, 2007 (‘‘POR’’). See 

Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative 

Reviews, 72 FR 14516 (March 28, 2007) 

(‘‘Initiation Notice’’). On April 17, 2007, 

the review request was withdrawn with 

respect to all parties who requested the 

review. Therefore, the Department is 

rescinding the administrative review of 

sales of certain preserved mushrooms 

from the PRC covering the POR. 

EFFECTIVE DATE: May 4, 2007. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Karine Gziryan, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office 4, Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 

Street and Constitution Avenue, NW, 

Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 

482–4081. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On February 2, 2007, the Department 

published a notice of opportunity to 

request an administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on certain 

preserved mushrooms from the PRC for 

the POR. See Antidumping or 

Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or 

Suspended Investigation; Opportunity 

to Request Administrative Review, 72 

FR 5007 (February 2, 2007). On 

February 28, 2007, China Processed 

Food Import and Export Company, 

COFCO (Zhangzhou) Food Industrial 

Co. Ltd., China National Cereals, Oils 

and Foodstuffs Import and Export 

Corporation, Fujian Yu Xing Fruit and 

Vegetable Foodstuff Development Co., 

and Xiamen Jiahua Import and Export 

Trading Co., Ltd. requested 

administrative reviews of their sales of 

certain preserved mushrooms to the 

United States during the POR. Pursuant 

to this request, the Department initiated 

an administrative review of the 


cprice-sewell on DSK89S0YB1PROD with NOTICES