alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 259 Received in Senate (RDS)]

  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 259

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 15, 2007

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Providing for a conditional adjournment of the House of Representatives 
         and a conditional recess or adjournment of the Senate.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That when the House adjourns on the legislative day of Thursday, 
November 15, 2007, or Friday, November 16, 2007, on a motion offered 
pursuant to this concurrent resolution by its Majority Leader or his 
designee, it stand adjourned until 2 p.m. on Tuesday, December 4, 2007, 
or until the time of any reassembly

              

 pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs 
first; and that when the Senate recesses or adjourns on any day from 
Thursday, November 15, 2007, through Thursday, November 29, 2007, on a 
motion offered pursuant to this concurrent resolution by its Majority 
Leader or his designee, it stand recessed or adjourned until noon on 
Monday, December 3, 2007, or such other time on that day as may be 
specified by its Majority Leader or his designee in the motion to 
recess or adjourn, or until the time of any reassembly pursuant to 
section 2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first.
    Sec. 2.  The Speaker of the House and the Majority Leader of the 
Senate, or their respective designees, acting jointly after 
consultation with the Minority Leader of the House and the Minority 
Leader of the Senate, shall notify the Members of the House and the 
Senate, respectively, to reassemble at such place and time as they may 
designate if, in their opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 15, 2007.

            Attest:

                                            LORRAINE C. MILLER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 87 / Monday, May 7, 2007 / Proposed Rules 25735 

[FR Doc. E7–8670 Filed 5–4–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6820–14–S 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

National Oceanic and Atmospheric 

Administration 

50 CFR Part 648 

[I.D. 042307E] 

Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management 

Council; Public Hearings; Correction 

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries 

Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 

Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), 

Commerce. 

ACTION: Notice of public hearings; 

correction. 

SUMMARY: The Mid-Atlantic Fishery 

Management Council will hold hearings 

to allow for public input on 

Amendment 9 to the Fishery 

Management Plan for the Atlantic 

Mackerel, Squid, and Butterfish Fishery 

(FMP). 

DATES: Written comments will be 

accepted until May 27, 2007. All 

meetings begin at 7 p.m. 

ADDRESSES: Comments may be 

submitted through any of the following 

methods: 

• Mail: Daniel T. Furlong, Executive 

Director, Mid-Atlantic Fishery 

Management Council, Room 2115 

Federal Building, 300 South New Street, 

Dover, Delaware 19904. 

• FAX: 302–674–5399. 

• E-mail: info@mafmc.org. Please 

indicate the subject as SMB 9 

Comments. 

• Federal e-Rulemaking Portal: http:// 

www.regulations.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Daniel T. Furlong, Executive Director, 

Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management 

Council, Room 2115 Federal Building, 

300 South New Street, Dover, Delaware 

19904, 302–674–2331, ext. 19. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Need for Correction 

On April 30, 2007, a document 

announcing public hearings on 

Amendment 9 to the Fishery 

Management Plan for Atlantic Mackerel, 

Squid, and Butterfish Fishery (FMP) 

was published (FR Doc. E7–8197). That 

document incorrectly listed the meeting 

times for the hearings. This document 

corrects the meeting times see DATES

section. All other information remains 

unchanged and will not be repeated in 

this correction. 

Dated: May 1, 2007. 

Tracey Thompson, 

Acting Director, Office of Sustainable 

Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service. 

[FR Doc. E7–8575 Filed 5–4–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–22–S 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSALS
# C_2017221EN.01001801.xml

| 10.7.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 221/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.7.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 221/18

---

Judgment of the General Court of 16 May 2017 — AW v EUIPO — Pharma Mar (YLOELIS)

(Case T-85/15) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU word mark YLOELIS - Earlier EU word mark YONDELIS - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2017/C 221/22)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Alfa Wassermann SpA (AW) (Alanno, Italy), authorised to replace Alfa Wassermann Hungary Kft. (represented by: M. Best, U. Pfleghar and S. Schäffner, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: S. Palmero Cabezas, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Pharma Mar, SA (Colmenar Viejo, Spain) (represented by: N. González-Alberto Rodríguez, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 18 December 2014 (Case R 1100/2014-1), relating to opposition proceedings between Pharma Mar and Alfa Wassermann Hungary.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Alfa Wassermann SpA (AW) to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Alfa Wassermann SpA (AW) to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 118, 13.4.2015.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
     10Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1998 and is qualified in its 
     entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  3-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Jun-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   Sep-30-1998
<CASH>                                           166,000
<SECURITIES>                                           0 
<RECEIVABLES>                                  2,756,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                      87,000
<INVENTORY>                                    7,932,000<F1>
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              11,602,000
<PP&E>                                        19,096,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                12,084,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                21,226,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          5,177,000
<BONDS>                                                0                                     
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0                         
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                       2,850,000<F3>
<OTHER-SE>                                     5,964,000<F2>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  21,226,000
<SALES>                                        8,021,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               8,201,000
<CGS>                                          6,946,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  6,946,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                99,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (311,000)<F4>
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (109,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (129,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (129,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       (.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (.09)
<FN>
<F1>Net of LIFO reserve of $1,115,000
<F2>Retained Earnings
<F3>1,513,411 Total common shares outstanding
<F4>Before minority interest of $73,000
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT (10)a



                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Experts" and to the
use of our report dated July 23, 1999 with respect to the consolidated financial
statements of Axyn Corporation for the period ended June 30, 1999 in the
Registration Statement Form 10-SB of Axyn Corporation for the registration of
its common and preference stock.

                                         /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Ottawa, Canada                           ERNST & YOUNG LLP
February 15, 2000                        Chartered Accountants
Eastern Long Island Sound Eelgrass 2006 Inventory
Clinton Bay/Westbrook Harbor/Duck Island Roads Sub-basins

Study Area Locus Map Watershed Sub-basin Locus Map

Eelgrass Cover
|_| High
i) Medium

| Low

Field Sites
Eelgrass Found
e Eelgrass Not Found

/\/ Sub-basin Boundary

This map is a product of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's National c= , Westbrook Harbor area
Wetlands Inventory Program, Region 5, and was produced for the | , 5 5 Clinton Harbor Area
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 1, Office of Ecosystem >

Protection. a ~ 24 Duck Island Roads area

Eelgrass digital data were derived from photo interpretation of 1:20,000-
scale true color photography dated 6/16/06 with intensive field verification.
ADS 2004 TrueColor, Digital Ortho Imagery were obtained from the University
of Connecticut CES program and used as a geo-referencing baseline for
photography. Interpreted information was generated "on screen", using
USFWS 2002 eelgrass delineations as a base layer.

1:30,000
This map was produced with the intent that it be used or displayed at
a scale of 1:30,000. There are no warranties made as to the fitness of
this map for any unlisted purpose or reproduction at any other than
the original scale.
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2023-1032

_____________________________

LAUREEN NICOLE MOODY,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County.

Jennie Kinsey, Judge.

June 7, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, M.K. THOMAS, and NORDBY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender, and Kasey Lacey, Assistant 

Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
Youhave reached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection(FDLP/EC) Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in theFDLP/EC. Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suiteof cataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications (CGP).
**Title:****Annual threat assessment of the Directorof National Intelligence for the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence
 
2006| 2007 | 2008| 2009 | 2010
 
SuDoc Number:PREX 28.16:
Item Number:0857-T-04 (online)
CGP System Number:000614853
 
October 11, 2017
 
 **
Case No. 8,042.

#### In re LANE.

[3 Ben. 98; 2 N. B. R. 309 (Quarto. 100); 1 Chi. Leg. News, 123.] 1

District Court, S. D. New York.

Dec. 29, 1868.

Bankruptcy — Power op Register — Costs.

A register in bankruptcy has power to make an order directing an assignee in bankruptcy to pay fees to officers of court out of moneys in his hands.

[Cited in Re Carow. Case No. 2,420; Re Noyes, Id. 10.371: Re Brinkman, Id. 1,884; Re Stafford, Id. 13.274.]

[In the matter of Joseph M. Lane, a bankrupt.]

[By I. T. Williams, Register: The undersigned, one of the registers of this court, hereby certifies to this honorable court that the solicitor for the above-named bankrupt, Hr. W. H. Waite, has appealed to me to make an order requiring the assignee to pay the sum of sixty-four dollars and thirty-six cents, for certain fees and disbursements incurred in said proceedings, and thereupon delivered to me the annexed bill of items, with his affidavit thereto annexed. The said assignee also appeared before me at the same time, and made no opposition to the application, having sufficient funds in his hands for that purpose. Having doubts as to my power to make such an order, I hereby certify the enquiry whether a register has such power. In case the court should be of the opinion that he has, I will then enter upon an examination of the items, and determine the question. Respectfully submitted.] 2

1

 [Reported by Robert D. Benedict. Esq., and here reprinted by permission. 1 Chi. Leg. News, 123. contains only a partial report.]

2

 [From 2 N. B. R. 309 (Quarto, 100).]

BLATCHFORD, District Judge.

I think the register has such power. It is fairly embraced within the power given to the *register,*by section 4 of the act [of 1867 (14 Stat. 519)]. “to make all computations of dividends and all orders of distribution,” and “to audit and pass accounts of assignees,” and within the power given to him. by general order No. 5, to conduct proceedings in relation to the following matters, when uncontested, namely, “taking evidence concerning expenses and charges against the bankrupt’s estate, auditing and passing accounts of assignees’ proceedings for the declaration and payment of dividends.” The doings of the register therein are made, by general order No. 5, “subject to the control of the court;” but, when there is no issue of law or fact raised and contested by any party in regard to the question, the register has power to entertain it and make the order. The fees paid to the officers of court, set forth in the bill of items, are fees which are embraced in the first subdivision in section 28, and that section directs that the order for a dividend shall direct the payment of those fees first in full by the assignee. An order for the assignee to pay those fees is an order of distribution, within section 4.
No. 55499.

#### Cosmos Shipping Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 167812-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
steam_record - Re: ELG ICR Extension Request 

 

Greetings, 

This e-mail is a confirmation that your extension request for the steam electric effluent 

guidelines questionnaire was received. Extension requests will be evaluated on a case-by-case 

basis. Please be aware that submittal of an extension request to EPA does not alter the due date

of your questionnaire unless and until EPA agrees to the extension and establishes a new date.

Sincerely, 

-----"Kustos, George P." <GPKUSTOS@southernco.com> wrote: ----- 

To: Jezebele Alicea/DC/USEPA/US@EPA 

From: "Kustos, George P." <GPKUSTOS@southernco.com> 

Date: 07/02/2010 05:57PM 

Subject: ELG ICR Extension Request 

From: <Alicea.Jezebele@epamail.epa.gov>

To: "Kustos, George P." <GPKUSTOS@southernco.com>

Date: 7/2/2010 8:09 PM

Subject: Re: ELG ICR Extension Request

Page 1 of 2

file://C:\Documents and Settings\TMedley\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\4C2E4773DO... 6/23/2011
 Please find attached a request, from Alabama Power Company, 

for a 60 day extension to complete the ELG ICR. A hard-copy has 

also been sent by FedEx overnight. 

 If you have any questions, please call me. 

 Thank you. 

George P. Kustos, PE 

* 8-257-3274 Intracompany 

* 205-257-3274 Bell Phone 

* 205-257-4349 Fax 

* 205-288-1459 Linc Cell Phone 

* mailto: GPKUSTOS@southernco.com<mailto:GPKUSTOS@southernco.com> 

[attachment "ELG Extension Request.PDF" removed by Jezebele Alicea/DC/USEPA/US] 

Page 2 of 2

file://C:\Documents and Settings\TMedley\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\4C2E4773DO... 6/23/2011
Case No. 9,950a.

#### MURPHY v. LEWIS et al.

[Hempst. 17.] 1

Superior Court, Territory of Arkansas.

Aug., 1822.

Execution- — Uxautiiokizbu bt Judgment — Mistake — PmvEii of Couht to Cokhect.

1. An execution issued on a judgment which does not authorize it, may be quashed on motion, and the money made thereon ordered to be refunded; but where there is only a clerical mistake, this cannot be done, for the execution may be corrected by the court, so as to conform to the judgment.

2. The power of the court to correct errors and mistakes in executions is unquestionable, and necessarily belongs to every court of record.

Motion [by Benjamin Murphy against Eli J. Lewis and Daniel Mooney, executors of Samuel Mosely, deceased] to quash an execution.

Before JOHNSON, SCOTT, and SELDEN, JJ.

OPINION OF

THE COURT.

This is a motion by the defendants to quash the execution and have the money refunded, the amount having been collected by the sheriff and paid over to the plaintiff. We have no doubt the execution issued for a greater sum than the judgment authorized; for instead of six per centum as damages upon the dissolution of the injunction, the execution is for six per centum per annum, thereby making a material difference in the amount against the defendants. For the defendants it has been contended, that, as the execution is erroneous, it ought to be quashed, and the money made thereon refunded. We are, however, of a different opinion. If the judgment had not authorized the emanation of an execution at all, or there had been no judgment, then it would be irregular to sue out one, and in such a case the doctrine contended for would be correct. But when there is only a clerical mistake in the execution, it may be corrected by the court, so as to make it conform to the judgment. Of the power to correct errors or mistakes in executions, there can be no doubt. In the case of Smith v. Carr, Hardin, 308, the court of appeals of Kentucky say: “The power of correcting the ministerial acts of its own officers necessarily and incidentally belongs to every court, and has always been exercised, as well before as since the formation of the present constitution.” The case referred to was one of an erroneous execution. In the case before this court, to order the whole of the money to be refunded, would be more than law or justice require. For what purpose should we require the whole of the money to be restored? That another execution might issue, and the true amount again be made and paid over to the plaintiff? We can perceive no good reason for a course of this kind, and no authority has been found to warrant it. We are therefore of opinion, that the mistake in the execution should be corrected, and that Murphy refund to Lewis and Mooney the amount which he has received above the sum for which the execution ought to have issue. Ordered accordingly.
EXHIBIT 32
 Certification by the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
Relating to a Periodic Report Containing Financial Statements
  (1)
    
    The Companys periodic report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010 (the
Form 10-Q) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
    
    
    
    CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER/s/ John L. Walsh
    
    
    
    /s/ John C. BarneyJohn L. Walsh
    
    
    
    John C. BarneyDate: May 7, 2010
    
    
    
    Date: May 7, 2010
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

</LEGEND>

       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         172,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               14,892,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                    85,000
<INVENTORY>                                 14,892,000<F1>
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            19,792,000
<PP&E>                                      19,323,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              10,660,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              29,137,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,244,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     2,876,000<F3>
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,909,000<F2>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                29,137,000
<SALES>                                     29,929,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            30,452,000
<CGS>                                       23,315,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               28,549,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             375,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,903,000<F4>
<INCOME-TAX>                                   723,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,360,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,360,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .90
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .88
<FN>
<F1> Net of LIFO RTeserve of $657,000
<F2> Retained earnings
<F3> 1,517,503 total common shares outstanding
<F4> Minority interest of 180,000
</FN>
        


</TABLE>