alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 89 (Wednesday, May 9, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 26407]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-8876]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health

National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine 
Announcement of Stakeholder Dialogue

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine 
(NCCAM) invites the public to a Stakeholder Dialogue. Attendees will 
meet the NCCAM Acting Director and discuss the Center's activities and 
priorities. The Dialogue will take place on June 20, 2007 in Bethesda, 
Maryland. Representatives from the complementary and alternative 
medicine community are particularly encouraged to attend.
    Background: The National Center for Complementary and Alternative 
Medicine (NCCAM) was established in 1999 with the mission of exploring 
complementary and alternative healing practices in the context of 
rigorous science, training CAM researchers, and disseminating 
authoritative information to the public and professionals.
    To date, NCCAM's efforts to rigorously study CAM, to train CAM 
researchers, to conduct outreach, and to facilitate integration have 
been guided by NCCAM's strategic plans located on the NCCAM Web site at 
http://nccam.nih.gov/about/plans/fiveyear/index.htm.
    Request for Participation: The public is invited to provide input 
into the NCCAM's priorities and activities at a Stakeholder Dialogue. 
This event will give NCCAM stakeholders an opportunity to voice their 
opinions regarding future directions for research, training, outreach, 
and integration in complementary and alternative medicine (CAM). The 
Dialogue will be held: June 20, 2007, 9 a.m. to 3 p.m., Natcher 
Conference Center, National Institutes of Health,Bethesda, Maryland 
20892.
    NCCAM's acting director will provide an overview of NCCAM's history 
and current activities, followed by a discussion with attendees. 
Dialogue attendees are welcome to participate in one of three afternoon 
breakout sessions (research, training, and communications) wherein 
there will be an opportunity to interact with NCCAM senior staff and 
discuss how NCCAM and the CAM community can work together in the 
future. Representatives from the complementary and alternative medicine 
community are particularly encouraged to attend. Those wishing to 
attend should register by June 15, 2007. To register, please visit 
http://nccam.nih.gov/dialogue.
    For Further Information: To request more information, visit the 
NCCAM Web site at http://nccam.nih.gov/dialogue, call 1-888-644-6226, 
or e-mail [email protected].

    Dated: May 1, 2007.
Christy Thomsen,
Director, Office of Communications and Public Liaison, National Center 
for Complementary and Alternative Medicine, National Institutes of 
Health.
 [FR Doc. E7-8876 Filed 5-8-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
```
#### Harry P. TEICHMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 05-5180.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Aug. 31, 2005.

Harry P. Teichman, pro se.

*365ORDER

Appellant having paid the initial fee, it is ORDERED that the order of dismissal and the mandate be, and the same hereby are, VACATED and RECALLED, and the notice of appeal is REINSTATED.

Appellant’s brief is due within 21 days of the date of filing of this order.
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 278 

Supporting Taiwan’s fourth direct and democratic presidential elections in 

March 2008. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 19, 2007 

Ms. ROS-LEHTINEN (for herself and Mr. LANTOS) submitted the following 

concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Supporting Taiwan’s fourth direct and democratic 

presidential elections in March 2008. 

Whereas the United States and Taiwan share common ideals 

and a clear vision for the 21st century, where freedom 

and democracy are the foundations for peace, prosperity, 

and progress; 

Whereas Taiwan has dramatically improved its record on 

human rights and routinely holds free and fair elections 

in a multiparty system, as evidenced by Taiwan’s first 

democratic presidential election in 1996, second in 2000, 

and third in 2004; 

Whereas the democratic and open presidential elections in 

2000 mark the first transfer of power from one party to 

another in Taiwan’s history; 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•HCON 278 IH 

Whereas Taiwan has demonstrated its unequivocal support 

for human rights and a commitment to the democratic 

ideals of freedom of speech, freedom of the press, rule of 

law, and free and fair elections routinely held in a 

multiparty system; 

Whereas Taiwan is one of the strongest democratic allies of 

the United States in the Asia-Pacific region; 

Whereas it is United States policy to support and strengthen 

democracy around the world; 

Whereas, with its stable democratic system and impressive 

economic prowess, Taiwan stands apart from many 

equally young democracies whose freedom and liberty 

have been severely challenged; 

Whereas Taiwan’s young democracy faces constant military 

threat and intimidation from neighboring China; and 

Whereas the United States Congress has organized congressional delegations to witness the electoral process in 

thriving democracies, including elections in Taiwan: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that— 

3 (1) the United States Government should reaf4 firm its unwavering commitment to Taiwan’s democ5 racy and security; and 

6 (2) international delegations should be encour7 aged to visit Taiwan for the purpose of witnessing 

8 the presidential elections in March 2008. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
No. 50629.

#### Protests 76232-K, etc., of Stone & Downer Co. et al. (Boston).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the court found that the facts herein agreed upon were such as to bring the case within the holding in *John Barr*v. *United States*(11 Cust. Ct. 88, C. D. 801), which record was incorporated herein. (See *John Barr*v. *United States,*324 U. S. 83, decided February 5, 1945.) In accordance therewith it was held that the currency of the invoices should be converted at the buying rate in the New York market at noon on the day of exportation (the “free” rate of exchange for pounds sterling), as certified by the Federal Reserve bank and set forth by the collector on each of the entries, The protests were sustained to this extent.
# ,-....,


# Responseto UnitedStatesEnvironmentalProtectionAgency Volume1of2 

# r· RequestforInformation receivedJune10,2010


# GraingerGeneratingStation



# ~anteecooperAugust 6, 20 1 0 M s. Eleanor Ku Codd i ng, P.E. Eastern Research Group , Inc.

14555 Av i on Parkway , Suite 200 Chant i lly, VA 20151- 11 02**~antee** cooper ' R. M. Singl e tar y, I ll Execuliv e Vice P r es i denl of Co rpora le Se r vi ces 16 4 3) 76 1·4 1 29 f ax : (843) 76 1 ·70 3 7 r ms in gl e@sanleecoope r .com RE : South Carolina Public Service Authority (Santee Cooper) Response to E PA's Request fo r Info rm a ti on Unde r Sect i on 308 o f the Clean Water Act and Section 300 7 of the Resou r ce Conservation and Recovery Act fo r Grainger Gene r ati n g Station - Request recei v ed June 10, 2010 Dea r Ms. Codd i ng: r , Enc l osed is the Sout h Carolina Pub l ic Service Authority 's (" Santee Cooper") response to th e United States Env i ronmenta l Protec t ion Agency 's ("EPA ") Request fo r l nfonna t ion ("Reques t") under Section 308 of the Clean Wate r Act and Sect i on 3007 of t h e Resource Conservation and Reco v ery Ac t. The Response and Certifica ti on is iden ti fied as Exhib it A , and a copy of t he Request r ecei v ed on Ju n e 10, 2010, is i de nti fied as Exhibit B . In prepari n g the Response, Santee Cooper conduc t ed a good fa i th review of its records and i nterv ie w ed know l edgeab le personnel , but reserves the rig ht t o supplemen t or c orrect th e Response if new o r add i tional respons i ve informat i on comes t o its attention. Si nce r ely , R M S : JH : SWJ Enclosures cc : w/o enclosures Stacey Adams SCDHEC 2600 Bull Street Columbia , SC 2 9201 OneRiverwoodOri v e: Mo n c k sCorner.SC2946 1 ·290 1 (6 43)761 · 8000 I P.O . Box2946 1 01 ; M oncksComer , SC29461·6 1 0 1
No. 54906.

#### American Thermo-Ware Company, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 151792-K (New York).

*327Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

It was stipulated that the Federal Reserve bank certified dual rates of exchange for the currencies'involved in the liquidation of the entries for the dates of exportation of the merchandise covered by the entries and that the circumstances relating to the liquidation of the said entries are similar in all material respects to those in Abstract 54732. In view of this stipulation and following the cited decision it was held that the currencies of the invoices covered by certain enumerated entries should have been converted in the manner directed by the judgment of this court in said Abstract 54732, in accordance with Bureau of Customs Circular Letter No. 2675, dated October 19, 1949.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency 

          - [FEMA-1664-DR] 

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster for the State of Hawaii (FEMA-1664-DR), dated October 17, 2006, and related determinations. 

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

January 15, 2007. 

      ( print page 2898)    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Magda Ruiz, Recovery Division, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2705. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Notice is hereby given that the incident period for this disaster is closed effective January 15, 2007. 

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund Program; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services Program; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance; 97.048, Individuals and Households Housing; 97.049, Individuals and Households Disaster Housing Operations; 97.050, Individuals and Households Program—Other Needs; 97.036, Public Assistance Grants; 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.)

R. David Paulison, 

Under Secretary for Federal Emergency Management, and Director of FEMA.

 [FR Doc. E7-889 Filed 1-22-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110-10-P
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21
 
                                 U S WEST, INC.
                              AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES
                            (as of February 8, 1999)
 
U S WEST, INC., A DELAWARE COMPANY
 
    U S WEST Advanced Technologies, Inc., a Colorado company
 
    U S WEST Business Resources, Inc., a Colorado company
 
       U S WEST Business Resources, Inc., a Delaware company
 
    U S WEST Capital Funding, Inc., a Colorado company
 
    U S WEST Communications, Inc., a Colorado company
 
       Block 142 Parking Garage Association, a Colorado Non-profit company
       El Paso County Telephone Company, a Colorado company
       Malheur Home Telephone Company, an Oregon company
       Mubeta Development Co., a Colorado company
       Training Partnerships, Inc., a Colorado Non-profit company
       1200 Landmark Center Condominium Association, Inc., a Nebraska Non-profit
       company
       U S WEST Database Services, Inc., a Colorado company
       U S WEST Wireless, L.L.C., a Delaware company
 
    U S WEST Communications Federal Services, Inc., a Colorado company
 
    U S WEST Communications Services, Inc., a Colorado company
 
       Please Hold Promotions, Inc., an Arizona company
 
    U S WEST Dex Holdings, Inc., a Delaware company
 
       U S WEST Dex, Inc., a Colorado company
 
           Interactive Video Enterprises, Inc., a Colorado company
           LOCALTouch Holdings, Inc., a Colorado company
 
               LOCALTouch Directory Services, Inc., a Colorado company
 
    U S WEST Education Foundation, a Washington Non-profit company
 
    U S WEST Enhanced Services, Inc., a Washington company
 
    U S WEST Federal Relations, Inc., a Delaware company
 
    U S WEST Foundation, a Colorado Non-Profit company
 
    U S WEST Information Technologies, Inc., a Colorado company
 
    U S WEST Internet Ventures, Inc., a Colorado company
 
    U S WEST Interprise America, Inc., a Colorado company
 
    U S WEST IP Holdings, Inc., a Delaware company
 
    U S WEST Investment Management Company, a Colorado company
 
    U S WEST Long Distance, Inc., a Colorado company
 
    U S WEST SPF Co., a Colorado company
 
    U S WEST Transoceanic, Inc., a Delaware company
 
       Transoceanic Operations, Inc., a Delaware company
       U S WEST Hong Kong, L.L.C., a Delaware company
 
           U S WEST (Asia), Limited, a Hong Kong company
 
    U S WEST Y2K, Inc., a Delaware company
 
    Western Re, Inc., a Vermont company
June 10, 1970

No. 70-42

#### James Allen Hedges (Formerly PVT, U. S. Marine Corps) v United States.

On consideration of the Petition for Extraordinary Relief filed in the above-entitled action, it appearing that the conviction and sentence giving rise to petitioner’s present confinement became final prior to June 2, 1969, it is, by the Court, this 10th day of June 1970,

ORDERED:

That said Petition be, and the same is, hereby denied. Mercer v Dillon, 19 USCMA 264, 41 CMR 264 (1970).

(J. FERGUSON would grant the Petition for the reasons set forth in his dissenting opinion in Mercer v Dillon, supra.)
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 5792] 

# AGENCY:

Department of State. 

# ACTION:

Amendment to original RFGP.

# SUMMARY:

                        The United States Department of State, Bureau of Educational and                               ( print page 25831)                            Cultural Affairs, announces revisions to the original RFGP announced in the                         **Federal Register**                         on Thursday, April 19, 2007 (                        **Federal Register**                         Vol. 72, No. 75):                     

IV.3e.1. Applicants must provide a detailed budget for administrative expenses only. Administrative costs are those costs that include applicant's staff salaries, benefits, telephone, fax, printing, office supplies, etc. All overhead costs associated with the program (for supervision, financial management, and other overhead expenses) are to be included in the proposal and should be controlled, reduced, or shared. The costs of support/central office in any parent agency (whether covered through an indirect costs' rate or as a direct cost) should be limited or cost shared to the extent possible. Concrete plans to streamline operations covered by overhead and non-program staff functions should be described in proposal submissions. (See Budget Guidelines in the PSI document.) 

## Additional Information 

Interested organizations should contact Michelle Lampher, Chief, Community Resources Division, Office of International Visitors, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, U.S. Department of State, ECA/PE/V/C SA-44, Rm 247, 301 4th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20547, prior to Tuesday, June 12, 2007. 

Dated: May 1, 2007. 

Dina Habib Powell, 

Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs, U.S. Department of State. 

 [FR Doc. E7-8684 Filed 5-4-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          26,371
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  176,867
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     52,771
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               279,779
<PP&E>                                         396,019
<DEPRECIATION>                                 123,370
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 650,255
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          181,300
<BONDS>                                        311,268
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           69,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,344
<OTHER-SE>                                      68,337
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   650,255
<SALES>                                        503,076
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               503,076
<CGS>                                          422,109
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  422,109
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                50,051
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              22,385
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,531
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,446
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,678
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (1,473)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,205
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.14
        

</TABLE>
No. 55508.

#### Bennett Brothers, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 161890-K (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

From an examination of the papers in the case the court found nothing therein tending in any way to overcome the presumption of correctness attaching to the decision of the collector. The protest was therefore overruled.
No. 41979.

#### Protests 103059-G, etc., of Max Taub (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of articles in chief value of cellulose filaments similar to those involved in Abstract 37230. The claim at 60 percent under paragraph 31 was therefore sustained.
Water Quality Standards Regulatory Revisions Rulemaking

MEMORANDUM TO RECORD

SUBJECT: Meeting with National Tribal Water Council

DATE: Wednesday, November 6, 2013

TIME: 8:00 – 9:00 AM

Participants:

EPA –Shari Barash, Janita Aguirre

National Tribal Water Council Representatives – Roll-call not taken. Input received from: Ken

Norton, Alex Cabillo, Nancy Schuldt, Dave Fuller.

Summary of Meeting: EPA provided an overview of the proposed rule and received input from

participants.
#### UNITED STATES, Appellant v JOSE M. RODRIGUEZ-GARCIA, Sergeant, U. S. Army, Appellee

12 USCMA 647, 31 CMR 233

No. 15,510

February 23, 1962

*Captain Alvin B. Fox*argued the cause for Appellant, United States. With him on the brief were *Lieutenant Colonel James G. McConaughy*and *Major Francis M. Cooper.*

*First Lieutenant Gary G. Keltner*argued the cause for Appellee, Accused. With him on the brief was *Captain Jerome D. Meeker.*

Opinion of the Court

FERGUSON, Judge:

Tried by general court-martial, the accused was found guilty of absence without leave, in violation of Uniform Code of Military Justice, Article 86, 10 USC § 886, and sentenced to confinement at hard labor for one year, forfeiture of $70.00 per month for a like period, and reduction to the lowest enlisted grade. The convening authority, acting pursuant to the recommendations of his staff judge advocate, “commuted” that portion of the sentence relating to confinement to a suspended bad-conduct discharge in order to comply with accused’s “intense desire to be restored to duty as soon as possible.” The board of review affirmed, reducing the period of the forfeitures, and The Judge Advocate General of the Army certified its decision to this Court upon the following question:

> “WAS THE BOARD OP REVIEW CORRECT IN HOLDING THAT, AS A MATTER OP LAW, THE ACTION OF THE CONVENING AUTHORITY IN THIS CASE DID NOT INCREASE THE SEVERITY OP THE SENTENCE ADJUDGED?”

We deem our decisions in United States v Johnson, 12 USCMA 640, 31 CMR 226, and United States v Fredenburg, 12 USCMA 646, 31 CMR 232, both this day decided, fully dispositive of the certified issue. The fact that *648the discharge was here suspended is immaterial. See United States v Murgaw, 2 USCMA 369, 8 CMR 169, and United States v Prescott, 2 USCMA 122, 6 CMR 122.

We note, however, that the convening authority believed that this ac-cused should be immediately restored to duty and took action to accomplish this result. Accordingly, any future action upon the record must be premised upon the suspension of that portion of the sentence relating to confinement from the date of the original action, unless accused has since engaged in misconduct which would support appropriate vacation proceedings. United States v DeVore, 10 USCMA 375, 27 CMR 449; United States v Crawford, 10 USCMA 464, 28 CMR 30; United States v Dean, 7 USCMA 721, 23 CMR 185.

The certified question is answered in the negative, and the actions of the board of review and convening authority are set aside. The record of trial is returned to The Judge Advocate General of the Army for transmittal to the convening authority for new post-trial proceedings in accordance with Code, supra, Articles 61 and 64, 10 USC §§ 861, 864.

Chief Judge Quinn and Judge Kil-DAY concur.
Before the First Division,

August 27, 1940

No. 44224.

#### Protest 833882-G of Katz Berk Hat Body Corp. (New York).

Opinion by

Brown, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is bodies, hoods, forms, or shapes similar to those the subject of *Cohn*v. *United States*(4 Cust. Ct. 166, C. D. 314). The protest was therefore sustained.