alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 84 (Wednesday, May 2, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 24191]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-8360]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[DA 07-1713; MB Docket No. 06-77; RM-11324; RM-11334]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Burkesville, KY; Belle Meade, TN; 
Edinburgh, IN; Goodlettsville, TN; Greensburg, KY; Hendersonville, TN; 
Hodgenville, KY; Hope, IN; Horse Cave, KY; Lebanon, Lebanon Junction, 
Lewisport, Louisville, Lyndon, KY; Manchester and Millersville, TN; New 
Haven, KY; Springfield and St. Matthews, KY; Tell City and Versailles, 
IN

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final rule, dismissal of petition for reconsideration.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document dismisses a Petition for Reconsideration filed 
by Indiana University and denies a Petition for Reconsideration filed 
by Indiana Community Radio Corporation both directed to the Report and 
Order in this proceeding. With this action, the proceeding is 
terminated.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert Hayne, Media Bureau
    (202) 418-2177.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Memorandum Opinion 
and Order in MB Docket No. 06-77, adopted April 13, 2007, and released 
April 16, 2007. The full text of this decision is available for 
inspection and copying during normal business hours in the FCC 
Reference Information Center at Portals II, CY-A257, 445 12th Street, 
SW., Washington, DC 20554. The complete text of this decision may also 
be purchased from the Commission's copy contractor, Best Copy and 
Printing, Inc., 445 12th Street, SW., Room CY-B402, Washington, DC 
20554, telephone 1-800-378-3160 or http://www.BCPIWEB.com. The 
Commission will not send a copy of this Memorandum Opinion and Order 
pursuant to the Congressional Review Act, see 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A), 
because the adopted rules are rules of particular applicability. This 
document does not contain new or modified information collection 
requirements subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA), Pub. 
L. 104-13. In addition, therefore, it does not contain any new or 
modified ``information collection burden for small business concerns 
with fewer than 25 employees,'' pursuant to the Small Business 
Paperwork Relief Act of 2002, Pub. L. 107-198, see 44 U.S.C. 
3506(c)(4).

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio, Radio broadcasting.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Assistant Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau.
 [FR Doc. E7-8360 Filed 5-1-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
# C_2016287EN.01002102.xml

| 8.8.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 287/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.8.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 287/21

---

Judgment of the General Court of 28 June 2016 — salesforce.com, Inc. v EUIPO (SOCIAL.COM)

(Case T-134/15) (1)

1

((European Union trade mark - Application for European Union word mark SOCIAL.COM - Absolute grounds for refusal - Descriptive character - Lack of distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2016/C 287/26)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: salesforce.com, Inc. (San Francisco, California, United States) (represented by: A. Nordemann and M. Maier, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Fischer, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 20 January 2015 (Case R 1752/2014-4), concerning an application for registration of the word mark SOCIAL.COM as a European Union trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders salesforce.com, Inc., to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders salesforce.com, Inc., to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 171, 26.4.2015.

1

---
WILLIAM CASEY TRIGG

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 16

- 1621

____ _________________________/

Opinion filed September 15, 2016.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Duval County

. Mark Hulsey, III , Judge

.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public

Defender, Tallahassee , for Ap pellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

RAY, KELSEY, and WINOKUR, JJ., CONCUR.
# C_2015346EN.01001101.xml

| 19.10.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 346/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.10.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 346/11

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Varbergs tingsrätt (Sweden) lodged on 28 August 2015 — P v Q

(Case C-455/15)

(2015/C 346/12)

Language of the case: Swedish

Referring court

Referring court

Varbergs tingsrätt

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: P

Applicant:

Defendant: Q

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Is Varbergs tingsrätt, in accordance with Article 23(a) of the Brussels II Regulation (1) or any provision [thereof] and notwithstanding Article 24 of that regulation, to refuse to recognise the judgment of the Silute District Court of 18 February 2015, see Annex A, and thus to continue to deal with the custody case pending before Varbergs tingsrätt?

1

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 of 27 November 2003 concerning jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in matrimonial matters and the matters of parental responsibility, repealing Regulation (EC) No 1347/2000 (OJ 2003 L 338, p. 1).

1

---
# •

•

• t SPA 19 RCRA REVISION CHECKLIST 167 F Exclusion ofRecycled Wood PreservingWastewaters 63 FR 28556-28753 May 26,1998 (RCRA ClusterVIII, non-HSWA provisions)

STATEANALOG IS: FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS FEDERAL RCRACITATION ANALOGOUS STArn CITATION LESS MORE WAC173-303- EQUIV- STRJN- STRJN- BROADER AU:NT GENT GENT INSCOPE PART 261 - IDENTIFICATION AND LISTING OF HAZARDOUS WASTE SUBPART A-GENERAL EXCLUSIONS add new paragraph; 261.4(a)(9)(iii) 071(3)(w)(iii) X prior to reuse, wood 261.4(a)(9)(iii)(A) 071(3)(w)(iii)(A) X preserving wastewaters and spent 261.4(a)(9)(iii)(B) 071(3)(w)(iii)(B) X wood preserving solutions described in 261.4(a)(9)(iii)(C) 071(3)(w)(iii)(C) X 261.4(a)(9)(i)&(ii), so 261.4(a)(9)(iii)(D) 071(3)(w)(iii)(D) X long as they meet all specified conditions 261.4(a)(9)(iii)(E) 071 (3)(w)(iii)(E) X

May 26, 1998 - Page 1 of 1 CLl67F- Revised: 11/12198 Printed: 12/19101
No. 42023.

#### Protest 954462-G of Fred’k Loeser & Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

McClelland, P. J.

On the record presented it was found that the sandals were McKay sewn. The protest was therefore overruled.
# C_2016243EN.01003001.xml

| 4.7.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 243/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.7.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 243/30

---

Judgment of the General Court of 25 May 2016 — Ice Mountain Ibiza v EUIPO — Marbella Atlantic Ocean Club (ocean beach club ibiza)

(Case T-5/15) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative mark ocean beach club ibiza - Earlier national figurative marks OC ocean club and OC ocean club Ibiza - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Similarity of the signs - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009))

(2016/C 243/31)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Ice Mountain Ibiza, SL (San Antonio, Spain) (represented by: J. L. Gracia Albero, F. Miazzetto and E. Cebollero González, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: S. Palmero Cabezas, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Marbella Atlantic Ocean Club, SL (Puerto Banús, Spain)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 8 October 2014 (Case R 2292/2013-1) relating to opposition proceedings between Marbella Atlantic Ocean Club and Ice Mountain Ibiza

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Ice Mountain Ibiza, SL to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Ice Mountain Ibiza, SL to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 73, 2.3.2015.

1

---
EXHIBIT 99.2


                                  CERTIFICATION

            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

                    (SUBSECTIONS (A) AND (B) OF SECTION 1350,
                   CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), the
undersigned officer of SonomaWest Holdings, Inc., a California corporation (the
"COMPANY"), does hereby certify that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2002 (the
"Form 10-Q") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                              Dated: November 14, 2002


                                              /s/ Thomas R. Eakin
                                              ------------------------
                                              Thomas R. Eakin
                                              Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 4.4.2


The Company agreed to amend those certain Warrant Certificates covering 107,727
shares of common stock of the Company previously issued to certain principals of
Batchelder and Partners, Inc. pursuant to a Warrant Agreement dated as of
September 11, 1996 to (i) extend the Exercise Period to March 11, 2003 and (ii)
register for resale such Warrants in connection with the filing of the Company's
next available registration statement.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 309 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 309

Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the District of Columbia 
              Special Olympics Law Enforcement Torch Run.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 4, 2008

 Ms. Norton (for herself, Mr. Graves, Mr. Hoyer, Mr. Cummings, Mr. Van 
Hollen, Mr. Wynn, Mr. Tom Davis of Virginia, Mr. Moran of Virginia, and 
  Mr. Wolf) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
     referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the District of Columbia 
              Special Olympics Law Enforcement Torch Run.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF USE OF CAPITOL GROUNDS FOR D.C. SPECIAL 
              OLYMPICS LAW ENFORCEMENT TORCH RUN.

    On June 6, 2008, or on such other date as the Speaker of the House 
of Representatives and the Committee on Rules and Administration of the 
Senate may jointly designate, the 2008 District of Columbia Special 
Olympics Law Enforcement Torch Run (in this resolution referred to as 
the ``event'') may be run through the Capitol Grounds as part of the 
journey of the Special Olympics torch to the District of Columbia 
Special Olympics summer games.

SEC. 2. RESPONSIBILITY OF CAPITOL POLICE BOARD.

    The Capitol Police Board shall take such actions as may be 
necessary to carry out the event.

SEC. 3. CONDITIONS RELATING TO PHYSICAL PREPARATIONS.

    The Architect of the Capitol may prescribe conditions for physical 
preparations for the event.

SEC. 4. ENFORCEMENT OF RESTRICTIONS.

    The Capitol Police Board shall provide for enforcement of the 
restrictions contained in section 5104(c) of title 40, United States 
Code, concerning sales, advertisements, displays, and solicitations on 
the Capitol Grounds, as well as other restrictions applicable to the 
Capitol Grounds, in connection with the event.
                                 <all>
```
No. 40417.

#### Protest 958320-G of Bullocks, Inc. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

Mufflers in chief value of silk, hemmed or hemstitched, similar to those involved in Abstract 26903 were held dutiable at 60 percent under paragraph 1209 as claimed.
No. 47596.

#### Protests 951806-G, etc., of Hudson Steel & Tube Corp. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of bicycle lamps for use with electric generators and that they are of the same character as those passed upon in *Wedemeyer v. United*States (7 Cust. Ct. 141, C. D. 556) the claim at 30 percent under paragraph 371 was sustained.
Before the United States Department of Transportation 

Washington, DC 

IVIarch 19, 2012 

Essential Air Service at: 

McCook, Nebraska 

under 49 U.S.C. 41731 et.seq. 

fi) 

( O 

>* 

c5 

—-00- - r-^ 

o~-5-^ -v-jC_>;= -

rH^?=!^ 

£!i~H—' 

o9M 

Docket OST-1997-3005 

This document contains tine response of Great Lakes Aviation, Ltd. to Order Requesting 

Proposals 2012-1-28. 

Great Lakes Aviation, Ltd. is pleased to submit this proposal to provide essential air 

transportation to McCook, Nebraska. 

We have more than 25 years of history of providing reliable Essential Air Service. Great Lakes' 

proposal contemplates non-stop, conveniently timed connecting services to our code- share 

partners United Airlines and Frontier Airlines at our Denver Hub. In addition. Great Lakes 

maintains interline ticketing and baggage agreements with the majority of the other carriers 

serving Denver, including interline e-ticketing agreements with American Airlines, Delta Airlines, 

Frontier Airlines, United Airlines and U.S. Airways. All of which will offer the McCook passenger 

maxium access to the domestic and international air transportation system. 

The proposal contemplates the use of pressurized 19 seat Beech 1900D aircraft; which we have 

a long history of operating. 

Questions and comments may-be referred to: 

Michael Matthews 

Chief Financial Officer 

Great Lakes Airlines 

1022 Airport Parkway 

Cheyenne, WY 82001 

(307) 432-7030 
Great Lakes Aviation, Ltd. 

Annual Compensation Requirements for Essential Air Service at 

McCook, Nebraska to Denver (DEN) 

Two Round Trips - B1900 

98.0% completion factor 

Departures: 

Block Hours: 

Revenue Passenger Miles: 

Available Seat Miles: 

1,227 

1,227 

872,000 

5,082,234 

Operating Revenues: 

Passenger: MCK-DEN 4,000 psgrs at $92.10 $368,400 

Other: (at 0.62% of passenger revenue) 

Total Operating Revenues: 

$2,284 

$370,684 

Operating Expenses: 

Direct: Aircraft and Hull Insurance 

Fuel and Oil 

Flying Operations 

Maintenance 

Total Direct Expenses: 

Total Indirect Expenses: 

Total Operating Expenses: 

Operating Loss 

Profit Element (5.0% of Total Operating Expenses) 

Annual Compensation Requirement: 

Representative Schedule 

[MCK] McCook, Nebraska 

DEPARTURE S 

$182,855 

$838,812 

$214,897 

$344,468 

FLT 

7243 

7243 

7309 

FLT 

7309 

7250 

7250 

DPT 

6:57 

7:39 

17:41 

ARR 

7:00 

7:42 

17:44 

A R R 1 V A 1 C 

•~"" r\ r\ r\ 1 V 

EQP 

BE1 

BE1 

BE1 

FREQ 

12345 

6 

12345.7 

TO 

DEN 

DEN 

DEN 

FROM 

DEN 

DEN 

DEN 

EQP 

BE1 

BE1 

BE1 

DPT 

15:30 

17:31 

19:10 

FREQ 

12345 

67 

12345 

ARR 

17:31 

19:32 

21:11 

$1,581,032 

$654,227 

$2,235,259 

f31,864.575) 

$111,763 

$1,976,338 

No Upline Scheduling Restrictions 

(,v../V^.-lV .'^Hkju.,/ / ^f^, 27 ;
Exhibit 12.2  I, Roman A. Frolov, certify that:  1.I have reviewed
this annual report on Form 20-F of OJSC Long-Distance and International
Telecommunications Rostelecom;  2.Based on my
knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3.Based on my
knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for,
the periods presented in this report;  4.The companys
other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in the
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the company and have:  (a)Designed such
disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;  (b)Designed such internal
control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over
financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles;  (c)Evaluated the
effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented
in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and  (d)Disclosed in this
report any change in the companys internal control over financial reporting
that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the companys
internal control over financial reporting; and  5.The companys
other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the companys auditors
and the audit committee of the companys board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):  (a)All significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and  (b)Any fraud, whether or
not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the companys internal control over financial reporting.  Date:  June 30, 2008  /s/ Roman A. FrolovRoman A. FrolovChief Accountant (CFO)
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

RULE 13a-14(b) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED AND 

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report of Aptevo Therapeutics Inc. on Form 10-K/A for the period ending December 31, 2017 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| Date: July 27, 2018 |   | By:    | /s/ Marvin White                      |
|---------------------|--------|--------|---------------------------------------|
|                |   |   | Marvin White                          |
|                |   |   | President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

 

“This certification accompanies the Form 10-K/A to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Aptevo Therapeutics Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form-K), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.”
skip to page content  Enter your search textButton to start search» Open Advanced Search- Home 
- Veteran Services 
- Business 
- About VA 
- Media Room 
- Locations 
- Contact Us 
- Related   Links 

Annual Benefits Reports

The 2009 Annual Benefits Report is now available 

The Annual Benefits Reports are a summary of benefits used by veterans, their dependents, and the Federal Government. These reports show the economic impact of the following programs by fiscal year:
-  Compensation &   Pension 
-  Education 
-  Life   Insurance 
-  Home   Loan Guaranty 
-  Vocational Rehabilitation &   Employment 

Reports are in PDF format. You may download free viewer and reader software.

Vision-impaired customers and those with text-only browsers may want to try Access Adobe for converting PDF documents into text. NOTE: This is an external link. By clicking on this link, you will leave the Department of Veterans Affairs Website. VA does not endorse and is not responsible for the content of the linked website.

Annual Benefits Reports
-  FY   2009  (2.20 Mb)  
-  FY   2008  (1.42 Mb)  
-  FY 2007  (2.72 Mb)   
-  FY   2006  (4.75   Mb)  
-  FY 2005  (3.28 Mb)  
-  FY 2004  (3.28 Mb)  
-  FY 2003   (3.28 Mb)  
-  FY 2002  (2.18   Mb)  
-  FY   2001  (2.06 Mb)  
-  FY 2000  (1.44   Mb)  
-  FY   1999  (1.48 Mb)
Compensation and Pension | GI Bill | Vocational Rehabilitation | Home Loans | Life InsuranceSurvivors' Benefits | Benefit Fact Sheets | Regional Office Web Sites | Manuals & RegulationsReports | If You Owe VA Money | GovBenefits.gov | USA Services
VA Home |  Privacy Policy |  FOIA |  Web Policies |  No FEAR Act Data |  Site Index |  USA.gov |  White House |  National Resource Directory |  Inspector General

U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs - 810 Vermont Avenue, NW - Washington, DC 20420

Reviewed/Updated Date: May 13, 2010