alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS


      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Universal Security Instruments,
Inc.  (the  "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission and to which this  Certification is
an exhibit (the "Report"),  the undersigned hereby certify,  pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects,  the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company for the periods reflected therein.

Date: August 12, 2005                   /s/ Harvey B. Grossblatt
                                        ------------------------
                                        Harvey B. Grossblatt
                                        Chief Executive Officer


                                        /s/ James B. Huff
                                        ------------------------
                                        James B. Huff
                                        Chief Financial Officer
No. 65711.

#### Ronco Corporation *v.*United States,

protests 234437-K, etc. (Philadelphia).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of metal magnetos and parts thereof the same in all material respects as those the subject of *Ronco Corporation*v. *United States*(44 Cust. Ct. 253, C.D. 2184), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 54903.

#### Fuchs Shoe Corp. *v.*United States,

protest 164187-K (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items of the merchandise consist of sisal handbags similar íd all material respects to those the subject of *United States v. Goldberg & Seltzer, Inc.*(36 C. C. P. A. 64, C. A. D. 399), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 85 (Thursday, May 3, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 24598]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-8485]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[ID-933-1430-FR; IDI-27169]


Termination of Recreation and Public Purposes Act Classification, 
Idaho

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice terminates a Recreation and Public Purposes Act 
Classification on 17 acres of public lands, more or less, as this 
classification is no longer needed under the provisions of the 
Recreation and Public Purposes Act, as amended (43 U.S.C. 869 et seq.).

EFFECTIVE DATE: May 3, 2007.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Catherine D. Foster, BLM Idaho State 
Office, 1387 S. Vinnell Way, Boise, Idaho 83709, (208) 373-3863.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On June 9, 1992, 17 acres of public lands 
were classified as suitable for Recreation and Public Purposes. The 
classification is hereby terminated and the segregation for the 
following described land is hereby terminated:

T. 37 N., R. 1 E., B.M.
    Section 34, Lots 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 26 and 27 (Formerly a 
portion of Lot 6).

    The area described above aggregates 17 acres of public lands, more 
or less, in Clearwater County.
    At 9 a.m. on May 3, 2007, the Recreation and Public Purposes 
Classification will be terminated. The lands will remain closed to 
location and entry under the public land laws and the mining laws, as 
they are currently withdrawn by the Federal Energy Regulatory 
Commission (FERC) for hydropower purposes: Power Project No. 10819.

    Dated: February 27, 2007.
Jimmie Buxton,
Chief, Branch of Lands, Minerals and Water Rights Resource Services 
Division.
[FR Doc. E7-8485 Filed 5-2-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-GG-P
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 12

                                 U S WEST, INC.
                       RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                             (DOLLARS IN MILLIONS)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                    YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                                      ----------------------------------------------------
                                                        1999       1998       1997       1996       1995
                                                      --------   --------   --------   --------   --------
<S>                                                   <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>
Income before taxes.................................   $1,902     $2,419     $2,429     $2,377     $2,248
Interest expense (net of amounts capitalized).......      736        543        405        448        429
Interest factor on rentals ( 1/3)...................       92         70         91         79         83
                                                       ------     ------     ------     ------     ------
Earnings available for fixed charges................   $2,730     $3,032     $2,925     $2,904     $2,760
                                                       ======     ======     ======     ======     ======
Interest expense....................................   $  763     $  568     $  425     $  479     $  468
Interest factor on rentals ( 1/3)...................       92         70         91         79         83
                                                       ------     ------     ------     ------     ------
Fixed charges.......................................   $  855     $  638     $  516     $  558     $  551
                                                       ======     ======     ======     ======     ======
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges..................     3.19       4.75       5.67       5.20       5.01
                                                       ======     ======     ======     ======     ======
</TABLE>
Case No. 6,921.

#### HURLIKI’S ADMINISTRATOR v. BACON et al.

[1 Cranch, C. C. 340.] 1

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

July Term, 1806.

Pleading — Plea of Bankruptcy — Demurrer.

1. If there be judgment for one of several defendants, upon a demurrer to his separate plea of bankruptcy, he may be examined as a witness for the other defendants, upon executing a release of his interest in his estate.

2. Parol evidence cannot be given of the understanding of the parties as to the obligation of a written contract.

Assumpsit on an agreement in writing. James Bacon, one of the defendants, having pleaded bankruptcy, the plaintiff [Hurliki’s administrator] demurred generally.

THE COURT overruled the demurrer.

Mr. Youngs, for defendants,

offered Bacon as a witness.

THE COURT admitted him to be sworn, upon executing a release of all right to a surplus and commission, &c.

THE COURT

(F1TZHUGH, Circuit Judge, absent)

refused to permit parol evidence to be given as to ihe intention and understanding ■ of the parties as to the obligation of the contract, and that the defendants were not to be personally liable, and were only to pay as they collected money from the subscribers. Three bills of exceptions were taken.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 269 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.Con.Res.269
                                             Agreed to December 14, 2007

                       One Hundred Tenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday,
            the fourth day of January, two thousand and seven

                          Concurrent Resolution

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That, in the enrollment of the bill H.R. 1585, the Clerk of the House 
of Representatives shall make the following corrections:
        (1) In the table in section 2201(a)--
            (A) strike ``Alaska'' in the State column and insert 
        ``Alabama''; and
            (B) in the item relating to Naval Station, Bremerton, 
        Washington, strike ``$119,760,000'' in the amount column and 
        insert ``$190,960,000''.
        (2) In section 2204(b)--
            (A) in paragraph (2), strike ``Hawaii'' and insert 
        ``Hawaii)'';
            (B) in paragraph (3), strike ``Guam'' and insert ``Guam)''; 
        and
            (C) add at the end the following new paragraph:
        ``(4) $71,200,000 (the balance of the amount authorized under 
    section 2201(a) for a nuclear aircraft carrier maintenance pier at 
    Naval Station Bremerton, Washington).''.
        (3) In section 2703--
            (A) insert ``(a) Authorization of Appropriations.--'' 
        before ``Funds'';
            (B) in paragraph (4), strike ``$2,107,148,000'' and insert 
        ``$2,241,062,000''; and
            (C) add at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(b) General Reduction.--The amount otherwise authorized to be 
appropriated by subsection (a) is reduced by $133,914,000.''.
Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.
```
Exhibit 32.1

                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the
undersigned, as Chairman, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Operating Officer of VSE Corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify that
to the best of the undersigned's knowledge:


	1) the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2007 (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

	2) the information contained in the Company's Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.


Dated: November 9, 2007                  /s/ D. M. Ervine
                                         ___________________________
                                         D. M. Ervine
                                         Chairman, President,
                                         Chief Executive Officer and
                                         Chief Operating Officer
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 359 

Expressing the sense of Congress on naming an aircraft carrier as the 

U.S.S. Barry M. Goldwater. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 20, 2008 

Mr. TANCREDO (for himself, Mr. FLAKE, Mr. MACK, Mr. SHADEGG, and Mr. 

TERRY) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred 

to the Committee on Armed Services 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of Congress on naming an aircraft 

carrier as the U.S.S. Barry M. Goldwater. 

Whereas Barry M. Goldwater was born in the Arizona Territory in 1909 to Baron and Josephine Goldwater; 

Whereas Barry M. Goldwater served as a pilot in the United 

States Army Air Corps during World War II and was 

later a Major General in the Air Force Reserve; 

Whereas Barry M. Goldwater was an avid pilot throughout 

his military career and after his retirement; 

Whereas Barry M. Goldwater was elected to the City Council 

in Phoenix in 1949, and served as United States Senator 

from Arizona from 1953–1965 and again from 1969– 

1987; 


erowe on PRODPC61 with BILLS
2 

•HCON 359 IH 

Whereas throughout his tenure in Congress, Senator Goldwater was as avid a proponent of a strong national defense as he was a staunch opponent of communism and 

totalitarianism; 

Whereas Senator Goldwater was nominated by the Republican Party as a candidate for President of the United 

States in 1964; 

Whereas Senator Goldwater memorably declared at the 1964 

Republican Convention, ‘‘I would remind you that extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice. And let me remind you also that moderation in the pursuit of justice 

is no virtue,’’; and 

Whereas Senator Barry M. Goldwater was awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom in 1986 by President Ronald 

Reagan: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that a nu3 clear-powered aircraft carrier of the Navy, either the air4 craft carrier designated as CVN–79 or the aircraft carrier 

5 designated as CVN–80, should be named the U.S.S. Barry 

6 M. Goldwater. 

Æ 


erowe on PRODPC61 with BILLS
1 TSRIA Document 2.2:

ATTACHMENT A CALCULATION OF DESIGN VALUES EXCLUDING DATA WITH DOCUMENTED DATA QUALITY ISSUES

TSRIA Chart 5 (revised on 2/24/2014) from the February 27, 2014 presentation summarized the highest SO 2 readings for the Coburn Road monitor and id entified data qualit y issues associated with each value. It was noted that 1) each reading shown for years 2009-2011 had at least one quality assurance (QA) failure, and 2) QA failure s decreased markedly after 2011. Nevertheless, the data shown in Chart 5 provided the basis for EPA’s design value calculation of 79 ppb for the years 2009-2011. TSRIA has documented numerous QA failures for these values and thus continues to assert that many of these values ma y not be used for design value calculations.
The contribution of those questionable read ings to EPA’s calculated design value is unquestioned. TSRIA has performed an additional se t of design value calculations using all data within each calendar year, with the exception of those specific hours with data quality issues identified in Chart 5. Because an exhaustive, hour-by-hour evaluation of the validity of each data point in each calendar year is beyond the scope of this appeal, TSRIA has conservatively assumed that all data not specifically identified as problematic in Chart 5 is valid. This is likely an optimistic assumption. However, this approa ch guarantees that the resulting design value calculation will represent the uppe r limit of its true value base d on the greatest possible number of valid data points.
Table 1 lists the four highest daily one-hour maximum SO 2 concentrations for each calendar year from 2009-2012, including the date of occurrence, after the invalid values identified in Chart 5 are excluded.
Table 1: Summary of four highest daily maximum SO 2 values with invalid data points excluded.

2009 2010 2011 2012 Date SO 2 (ppb) Date SO 2 (ppb) Date SO 2 (ppb) Date SO 2 (ppb) 12/28 69 03/16 73 10/19 65 09/13 129 05/18 68 09/04 73 02/22 64 11/03 70 01/21 67 12/26 70 08/07 63 09/28 54 08/26 66 01/09 69 05/05 62 07/25 53
Previous 4 th -high 72 Previous 4 th -high 91 Previous 4 th -high 74 Previous 4 th -high 70

Note: complete results for 2013 have been excluded from this table for readability, and beca use EPA did not use 2013 in its design value calculations. Howeve r, removal of the single 2013 da ta point with data quality pr oblems from Chart 5 decreases th e fourth-highest value for 2013 from 48 ppb to 46 ppb.2 It is evident that ex cluding the invalid data points (23 over the 2009-2012 period) significantly decreases the fourth-hig hest daily maximum SO 2 concentration in each year. The “Previous 4 th

high” values represent th e results obtained by EPA, based on the assumption that all data points were valid. This is especially noticeable in 2010 , when the fourth-highest value decreased from 91 ppb to 69 ppb.
There is a corresponding decrease in calculated design values:

 For the 2009-2011 period, the calculated de sign value decreases from 79.00 ppb to 65.67 ppb.

 For the 2010-2012 period, the calculated de sign value decreases from 78.33 ppb to 61.33 ppb.
Exhibit 32.1   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002    In connection with Amendment No. 2 to the Report of Competitive Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Johnnie D. Johnson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   /s/ Johnnie D. Johnson Johnnie D. Johnson Chief Executive Officer  September 15, 2011  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Competitive Technologies and will be retained by Competitive Technologies and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 10.45.3

SECOND AMENDMENT TO INCENTIVE AGREEMENT

This Second Amendment is made and entered into as of August 29, 2001 (the "Second Amendment") by and between Ask Jeeves, Inc. (the "Company") and
Claudio Pinkus. Capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Agreement.

RECITALS

WHEREAS, Claudio Pinkus and the Company have entered into that certain Incentive Agreement, dated
January 2, 2001, and amended June 18, 2001 (the "Agreement"); and

WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend the Agreement to further extend the Grant Deadline to effectuate the transfers described in
Section 2.2. of the Agreement.

NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereby agree
as follows:

AGREEMENT

1.Grant Date Extension.The Grant Deadline is hereby extended to September 30, 2001.

2.No Other Modifications.Except as expressly modified by this Second Amendment, all other provisions of the
Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Second Amendment is effective as of the first date written above.

| |  | ASK JEEVES, INC.
| |  | ----------------
| |  |                 
| |  | By:             
| |  | Name:           
| |  | Title:          
| |  |                 
| |  | By:             
| |  | Name:           

---

QuickLinks
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 13 (Monday, January 22, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 2721]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-833]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 5675]


Determination and Waiver of Section 620(q) of the Foreign 
Assistance Act of 1961, as Amended, Relating to Assistance to the 
Democratic Republic of Congo

    Pursuant to the authority vested in me by section 620(q) of the 
Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, as amended (FAA), and by Executive 
Order 12163, as amended, I hereby determine that assistance to the 
Democratic Republic of Congo is in the national interest of the United 
States and thereby waive, with respect to that country, the application 
of section 620(q) of the FAA.
    This determination shall be reported to Congress and published in 
the Federal Register.

    Dated: December 11, 2006.
Condoleezza Rice,
Secretary of State, Department of State.
 [FR Doc. E7-833 Filed 1-19-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-26-P
[Fitzgerald Sanders letterhead]

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the inclusion in this registration  statement on Form 10-SB of our
report,  dated February 10, 2000, on our compilation of financial  statements of
Commercial Concepts, Inc. for the nine months ended November 30, 1999 and 1998.

Fitzgerald Sanders, LLC

/s/ Fitzgerald Sanders, LLC

Salt Lake City, Utah
February 22, 2000
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         105,938
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   26,537
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      8,195
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               173,376
<PP&E>                                      11,153,154
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,179,834
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,734,617
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,127,219
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       791,782
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,032,290
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,734,617
<SALES>                                         87,261
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               391,887
<CGS>                                           43,095
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  413,344
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              48,067
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (21,457)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (21,457)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.01)
        

</TABLE>
No. 55495.

#### Bel Paese Sales Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 70926-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
#### Globe Shipping Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States

No. 7459.

Invoices dated London, England, July 13, 1946, etc.

Certified July 16, 1946, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., July 23, 1946, etc.

Entry No. AD 173, etc.

(Decided December 2, 1947)

*John D. Bode*for the plaintiffs.

*Paul P. Bao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Mollison, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importers on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.