24190 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 84 / Wednesday, May 2, 2007 / Rules and Regulations 

gas liquid chromatography (GLC) 

(Method I in Pesticides Analytical 

Manual (PAM II; the limit of detection 

is 0.05 part per million (ppm)) and High 

Performance Liquid Chromatography 

(HPLC) with fluorometric detection. The 

HPLC procedure has undergone 

successful Agency validation, and was 

recommended for inclusion in PAM II. 

A gas chromatography/mass 

spectrometry (GC/MS) method for 

glyphosate crops has also been validated 

by EPA’s Analytical Chemistry 

Laboratory (ACL). 

The HPLC and GC/MS methods may 

be requested from: Chief, Analytical 

Chemistry Branch, Environmental 

Science Center, 701 Mapes Rd., Ft. 

Meade, MD 20755-5350; telephone 

number: (410) 305-2905; e-mail address: 

residuemethods@epa.gov. 

B. International Residue Limits 

Codex and Mexican maximum 

residue levels (MRLS) are established 

for residues of glyphosate per se and 

Canadian MRLs are established for the 

combined residues of glyphosate and 

animomethylphosphonic acid (AMPA) 

on a variety raw agricultural 

commodities. No international 

harmonization issues are associated 

with the addition of the dimethylamine 

salt of glyphosate to the tolerance 

expression. 

V. Conclusion 

Therefore, tolerance expression for 40 

CFR 180.364 (a) is revised to read: 

‘‘Tolerances are established for residues 

of glyphosate N- 

(phosphonomethyl)glycine resulting 

from the application of glyphosate, the 

isoprpylamine salt of glyphosate, the 

ethanolamine salt of glyphosate, the 

dimethylamine salt of glyphosate, the 

ammonium salt of glyphosate, and the 

potassium salt of glyphosate, in or on 

the following food commodities.’’ 

VI. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

This final rule establishes a tolerance 

under section 408(d) of FFDCA in 

response to a petition submitted to the 

Agency. The Office of Management and 

Budget (OMB) has exempted these types 

of actions from review under Executive 

Order 12866, entitled Regulatory 

Planning and Review (58 FR 51735, 

October 4, 1993). Because this rule has 

been exempted from review under 

Executive Order 12866, this rule is not 

subject to Executive Order 13211, 

Actions Concerning Regulations That 

Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 

Distribution, or Use (66 FR 28355, May 

22, 2001) or Executive Order 13045, 

entitled Protection of Children from 

Environmental Health Risks and Safety 

Risks (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997). 

This final rule does not contain any 

information collections subject to OMB 

approval under the Paperwork 

Reduction Act (PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3501 et 

seq., nor does it require any special 

considerations under Executive Order 

12898, entitled Federal Actions to 

Address Environmental Justice in 

Minority Populations and Low-Income 

Populations (59 FR 7629, February 16, 

1994). 

Since tolerances and exemptions that 

are established on the basis of a petition 

under section 408(d) of FFDCA, such as 

the tolerance in this final rule, do not 

require the issuance of a proposed rule, 

the requirements of the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et 

seq.) do not apply. 

This final rule directly regulates 

growers, food processors, food handlers 

and food retailers, not States or tribes, 

nor does this action alter the 

relationships or distribution of power 

and responsibilities established by 

Congress in the preemption provisions 

of section 408(n)(4) of FFDCA. As such, 

the Agency has determined that this 

action will not have a substantial direct 

effect on States or tribal governments, 

on the relationship between the national 

government and the States or tribal 

governments, or on the distribution of 

power and responsibilities among the 

various levels of government or between 

the Federal Government and Indian 

tribes. Thus, the Agency has determined 

that Executive Order 13132, entitled 

Federalism (64 FR 43255, August 10, 

1999) and Executive Order 13175, 

entitled Consultation and Coordination 

with Indian Tribal Governments (65 FR 

67249, November 6, 2000) do not apply 

to this rule. In addition, This rule does 

not impose any enforceable duty or 

contain any unfunded mandate as 

described under Title II of the Unfunded 

Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) 

(Public Law 104-4.) 

This action does not involve any 

technical standards that would require 

Agency consideration of voluntary 

consensus standards pursuant to section 

12(d) of the National Technology 

Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 

(NTTAA), Public Law 104-113, section 

12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272 note). 

VII. Congressional Review Act 

The Congressional Review Act, 5 

U.S.C. 801 et seq., generally provides 

that before a rule may take effect, the 

agency promulgating the rule must 

submit a rule report to each House of 

the Congress and to the Comptroller 

General of the United States. EPA will 

submit a report containing this rule and 

other required information to the U.S. 

Senate, the U.S. House of 

Representatives, and the Comptroller 

General of the United States prior to 

publication of this final rule in the 

Federal Register. This final rule is not 

a ‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 

804(2). 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180 

Environmental protection, 

Administrative practice and procedure, 

Agricultural commodities, Pesticides 

and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements. 

Dated: April 17, 2007. 

Lois Rossi, 

Director, Registration Division, Office of 

Pesticide Programs. 

■ Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is 

amended as follows: 

PART 180—[AMENDED] 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 180 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371. 

■ 2. Section 180.364, paragraph (a) is 

amended by revising the introductory 

text to read as follows: 

§ 180.364 Glyphosate; tolerances for 

residues. 

(a) General. Tolerances are 

established for residues of glyphosate N- 

(phosphonomethyl)glycine resulting 

from the application of glyphosate, the 

isopropylamine salt of glyphosate, the 

ethanolamine salt of glyphosate, the 

dimethylamine salt of glyphosate, the 

ammonium salt of glyphosate, and the 

potassium salt of glyphosate in or on the 

following food commodities: 

* * * * * 

[FR Doc. E7–8000 Filed 5–1–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–S 

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION 

47 CFR Part 73 

[DA 07–1715; MB Docket No. 05–328; RM– 

10577; RM–11343; RM–11344] 

Radio Broadcasting Service; Broken 

Bow and Millerton, OK 

AGENCY: Federal Communications 

Commission. 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: The Audio Division: grants a 

counterproposal (RM–11343) filed by 

Charles Crawford to allot Channel 

265C2 at Millerton, Oklahoma; 

dismisses a petition for rule making 

(RM–10577) per petitioner Jeraldine 

mmaher on DSK3CLS3C1PROD with $$_JOB

Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 84 / Wednesday, May 2, 2007 / Rules and Regulations 24191 

Anderson’s request; and dismisses a 

counterproposal (RM–11344) per 

petitioner Katherine Pyeatt’s request. 

Channel 265C2 can be allotted at 

Millerton, Oklahoma in compliance 

with the Commission’s minimum 

distance separation requirements at 34– 

03–37 North Latitude and 94–54–04 

West Longitude with a site restriction of 

13.3 kilometers (8.2 miles) northeast of 

the community’s reference. 

DATES: Effective May 31, 2007. 

ADDRESSES: Secretary, Federal 

Communications Commission, 445 

Twelfth Street, SW., Washington, DC 

20554. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Helen McLean, Media Bureau, (202) 

418–2738. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a 

synopsis of the Commission’s Report 

and Order, MB Docket No. 05–328, 

adopted April 13, 2007, and released 

April 16, 2007. The full text of this 

Commission decision is available for 

inspection and copying during regular 

business hours at the FCC’s Reference 

Information Center, Portals II, 445 

Twelfth Street, SW., Room CY–A257, 

Washington, DC 20554. The complete 

text of this decision may also be 

purchased from the Commission’s 

duplicating contractor, Best Copy and 

Printing, Inc., 445 12th Street, SW., 

Room CY–B402, Washington, DC 20554, 

telephone 1–800–378–3160 or http:// 

www.BCPIWEB.com. The Commission 

will send a copy of this Report and 

Order in a report to be sent to Congress 

and the Government Accountability 

Office pursuant to the Congressional 

Review Act, see 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A). 

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73 

Radio, Radio broadcasting. 

■ As stated in the preamble, the Federal 

Communications Commission amends 

47 CFR part 73 as follows: 

PART 73—RADIO BROADCAST 

SERVICES 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 73 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 334, 336. 

§ 73.202 [Amended] 

■ 2. Section 73.202(b), the Table of FM 

Allotments under Oklahoma, is 

amended by adding Millerton, Channel 

265C2. 

Federal Communications Commission. 

John A. Karousos, 

Assistant Chief, Audio Division, Media 

Bureau. 

[FR Doc. E7–8359 Filed 5–1–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6712–01–P 

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION 

47 CFR Part 73 

[DA 07–1713; MB Docket No. 06–77; RM– 

11324; RM–11334] 

Radio Broadcasting Services; 

Burkesville, KY; Belle Meade, TN; 

Edinburgh, IN; Goodlettsville, TN; 

Greensburg, KY; Hendersonville, TN; 

Hodgenville, KY; Hope, IN; Horse Cave, 

KY; Lebanon, Lebanon Junction, 

Lewisport, Louisville, Lyndon, KY; 

Manchester and Millersville, TN; New 

Haven, KY; Springfield and St. 

Matthews, KY; Tell City and Versailles, 

IN 

AGENCY: Federal Communications 

Commission. 

ACTION: Final rule, dismissal of petition 

for reconsideration. 

SUMMARY: This document dismisses a 

Petition for Reconsideration filed by 

Indiana University and denies a Petition 

for Reconsideration filed by Indiana 

Community Radio Corporation both 

directed to the Report and Order in this 

proceeding. With this action, the 

proceeding is terminated. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Robert Hayne, Media Bureau 

(202) 418–2177. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a 

synopsis of the Memorandum Opinion 

and Order in MB Docket No. 06–77, 

adopted April 13, 2007, and released 

April 16, 2007. The full text of this 

decision is available for inspection and 

copying during normal business hours 

in the FCC Reference Information Center 

at Portals II, CY–A257, 445 12th Street, 

SW., Washington, DC 20554. The 

complete text of this decision may also 

be purchased from the Commission’s 

copy contractor, Best Copy and Printing, 

Inc., 445 12th Street, SW., Room CY– 

B402, Washington, DC 20554, telephone 

1–800–378–3160 or http:// 

www.BCPIWEB.com. The Commission 

will not send a copy of this 

Memorandum Opinion and Order 

pursuant to the Congressional Review 

Act, see 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A), because 

the adopted rules are rules of particular 

applicability. This document does not 

contain new or modified information 

collection requirements subject to the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 

(PRA), Pub. L. 104–13. In addition, 

therefore, it does not contain any new 

or modified ‘‘information collection 

burden for small business concerns with 

fewer than 25 employees,’’ pursuant to 

the Small Business Paperwork Relief 

Act of 2002, Pub. L. 107–198, see 44 

U.S.C. 3506(c)(4). 

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73 

Radio, Radio broadcasting. 

Federal Communications Commission. 

John A. Karousos, 

Assistant Chief, Audio Division, Media 

Bureau. 

[FR Doc. E7–8360 Filed 5–1–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6712–01–P 

mmaher on DSK3CLS3C1PROD with $$_JOB