alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NC 27711 

## JUN 2 S

## 2010

Mr. Michael L. Pelan, Regional Environmental Manager Lafarge North America

- Cement Division 12950 Worldgate Drive, Suite 500 Herndon, Virginia 20170 OFFICE OF AIR QUALITY PLANNING AND STANDARDS

Re: Standards ofPerformance for New Stationary Sources and Emission Guidelines for Existing Sources; Commercial and Industrial Solid Waste Incineration (CISWI) Units; Proposed Rule

- Request to Extend the Public Comment Period Dear Mr. Pelan: Thankyou for your June 15,2010, letterrequesting that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) extend the public comment period an additional 30 days for the proposed CISWI rule. Your letter states this request is.based on the need to facilitate a comprehensive review ofthe proposal and to allow adequate time to develop a valuable response. The published commentperiod began on June 4, 2010, although the proposed rule was available onEPA's website on April 30, 2010. EPA extended the deadline for written comments by 15 days (75 FR 32683) to August 3,2010. While EPA understands your concerns and appreciates your intent to provide substantive comments, we believe it is in the overall best interest to retain the existing commentperiod. In particular, EPA notes that it musttake final action onthe proposed CISWI rule by December 16, 2010, pursuantto a court order issuedby the U.S. District Court for the District ofColumbia. The commentperiod will close as scheduled onAugust 3, 2010. Written comments must be postmarked no later than August 3, 2010. All interested people are encouraged to participate in the rule makingprocess during the commentperiod. All comments submitted during the commentperiod will be carefully considered. EPA welcomes the opportunity to continue working with the Lafarge North America

- Cement Division to improve the public involvement process.



# .Ie:Toni Wyche Jones, OAQPS u;cer 

### Jy 

# /J}/)/f/-(

# ;;~ . Charlene Spells Natural Resources and Commerce G1'oup Sector Policies and Programs Division

Internet Address (URL) • http://www

.epa.gov RecycledIRecyclable • Printed wnh Vegetable 011 Based Inks on Recycled Paper (Minimum 25% Postconsumer)
<SEQUENCE>4
<FILENAME>certification 33102.txt
                                                           Exhibit 99.2



Insert for Below Signatures on Form 10-Q (3-31-02)


                                     CERTIFICATION



               Pursuant to 18 U.S.C., Section 1350, the undersigned officer
of Uptowner Inns, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies, to such officer's
knowledge, that the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
Quarter Ended March 31, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable,
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated:  ___________              ____________________________
                                             Name:  /s/ Carl E. Midkiff
                                             Title:     Chief Executive Officer




                                      CERTIFICATION



               Pursuant to 18 U.S.C., Section 1350, the undersigned officer
of Uptowner Inns, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies, to such officer's
knowledge, that the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
Quarter Ended March 31, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable,
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated:  ___________              ____________________________
                                             Name:  /s/ David Robinson
                                             Title:     Chief Financial Officer
### Geology and water resources of the Bitterroot Valley, southwestern Montana, with a section on chemical quality of water

By: R. G. McMurtreyRichard L. KonizeskiM. V. JohnsonJohn H. BartellsH. A. Swenson

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1889

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
- Superseded Publications:
                                        Geology and water resources of the Bitterroot Valley, Montana(1968)                                    

- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.12

                        ASSUMPTION OF AMENDED AGREEMENT


TO:    ALLEN KARP

_______________________________________________________________________________

The undersigned hereby assumes the Amended Agreement (as such term is defined in
the Management Information Circular and Proxy Statement/Prospectus of Cineplex
Odeon Corporation ("Cineplex") dated February 13, 1998) and will cause Cineplex
to employ you on the terms contained in the Amended Agreement and to pay you the
amounts contemplated therein.


DATED the 14th day of May, 1998



LOEWS CINEPLEX ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION


Per:  /s/ John C. McBride, Jr
    __________________________
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 20

- 00161

- CV

I N RE C APRICE G ARCIA §

§

§

§

§ Original Proceeding

F rom the 16th District Court

of Denton County ( F17

- 2073

- 16 )

August 20 , 2020

Opinion by Justice Birdwell

JUDGMENT

This court has co nsidered Relator ’s Petition for Writ of Mandamus in this case

and holds that the petition should be conditionally granted

. Accordingly, w e

conditionall y grant the writ of mandamus and direct the trial court to vacat e its

Novem ber 12, 20 19 “Or d er on Motion for Award of A t torney ’s Fees, Costs &

Exp enses. ” Our writ will iss ue only if the t rial cour t fails to comply

.

It is further ordered that Real Parties in Interest Tyler Melton and Proclaim

Roofing, LLC shall pay all of the cost s of this proce eding, for which let execution

issue

.SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By

__ /s/ Wade Birdwell

__________________ Justice Wade Birdwell
March 12, 2012

Re: Docket No. DOT-OST-2012-0029

Dear Secretary LaHood:

I am joining Alaska Airlines in its effort to provide convenient service from Portland to 

our nation's capital.

I am writing in support of the application of Alaska Airlines, Inc. to provide a daily direct 

flight to Reagan National Airport (DCA) from Portland International Airport (PDX). I 

believe that Alaska is the right choice. With their large Portland hub presence, strong 

customer service focus and track record for operational reliability, the carrier is best 

suited to provide a nonstop PDX to DCA flight. Portland is the second largest market to 

the Washington DC area without nonstop service to DCA. With a nonstop route from 

PDX to DCA, Oregon and S.W. Washington residents will no longer be forced to use 

more time-consuming and less convenient service to our nation's capital. I respectfully 

urge you to grant Alaska Airlines' application to serve PDX-DCA. 

Dederia D. Caldwell

Portland, OR

dcaldwe@hotmail.com
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE AUDITED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS AND OF THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JANUARY 31, 2000.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-2000
<CASH>                                           7,026
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    152,065
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               170,987
<PP&E>                                         185,972
<DEPRECIATION>                                 112,730
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 247,933
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          103,692
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           117
<OTHER-SE>                                      89,974
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   247,933
<SALES>                                        447,155
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               447,155
<CGS>                                          288,212
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  288,212
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,708
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,524)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,359)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,165)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,165)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.19)


</TABLE>
(Reap. Dec. 9832)

#### W. J. Byrnes Co. of N. Y., Inc., et al. *v.*United States

Entry No. 791155, etc.

(Decided November 9, 1960)

*Barnes, Richardson & Colburn*for the plaintiffs.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

OliveR, Chief Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement enumerated in schedule “A,” hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision on a written stipulation, reading as follows:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, subject to the approval of the Court, that the issues in the appeals for reappraisement listed in the Sched*547ule liereto annexed and made a part hereof are the same in all material respects as the issues in *Paramount Import Co., Inc., et al.*v. *United States,*Reap. Dec. 9697 and that the record in said ease may be incorporated herein.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the appraised values of the merchandise involved in the cases listed in the Schedule hereto annexed less additions made by the importer on entry because of advances made by the Appraiser in similar cases is equal to the market value or the price at the time of exportation of such merchandise to the United States, at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of Czechoslovakia in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade for exportation to the United States, packed ready for delivery, and that the foreign values of such or similar merchandise were no higher.

In the incorporated case, it was held that the amount paid a foreign commissionaire for services rendered in connection with the purchase of merchandise in the foreign market, and which amount did not inure to the benefit of the seller, was a buying commission and, therefore, was not part of the dutiable value of the merchandise.

On the agreed facts and following my cited decision on the law, I find that the proper basis for appraisement of the merchandise in question is export value, as defined in section 402(d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, and hold that such statutory value therefor is the appraised values, less additions made by the importer on entry because of advances made by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 2 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Whereas individuals from Puerto Rico, the United States Virgin Islands, American Samoa, Guam, and the Northern 

Mariana Islands have contributed to many aspects of the 

history and culture of the United States, including its 

politics, athletics, and music; 

Whereas many students do not know the location or the significance of these places; 
2 

•HCON 2 EH 

Whereas the diversity of the citizens of the United States 

strengthens the Nation, and individuals from the territories of the United States contribute to that diversity; 

and 

Whereas it is important for students to study the history of 

these geographic areas as part of United States history: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that chil3 dren in the United States should understand and appre4 ciate the contributions of individuals from Puerto Rico, 

5 the United States Virgin Islands, American Samoa, 

6 Guam, and the Northern Mariana Islands and the con7 tributions of such individuals in United States history. 

Passed the House of Representatives June 23, 2008. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 2 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the Congress that children 

tions of such individuals in United States history. territories of the United States and the contribupreciate the contributions of individuals from the in the United States should understand and ap-
Certification

            Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

            (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of
                          Title 18, United States Code)


Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.  1350), the
undersigned officer of SonomaWest Holdings,  Inc., a California corporation (the
"Company"), does hereby certify that:

The Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended  December 31, 2002 (the
"Form 10-Q") of the Company  fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section
13(a) or 15(d), as applicable,  of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 and that
the  information  contained  in the Form 10-Q fairly  presents,  in all material
respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of  operations of the Company.


Dated: February 13, 2003



                                      /s/  Thomas R. Eakin
                                     -----------------------------------------
                                      Thomas R. Eakin
                                      Chief Financial Officer
RECORD OF COMMUNICATION

TELEPHONE CALL

DATE: August 2, 2012

SUBJECT: South Coast AQMD Rule 1176 Sumps

FROM: Nicole Law – EPA Region IX, Rules Office

Stanley Tong – EPA Region IX, Rules Office

TO: Eugen Teszler – South Coast AQMD, Air Quality Specialist, Planning, Rule 

Development and Area Sources Rule Development, (909) 396-2077

Dairo Moody – South Coast AQMD, Air Quality Specialist, Planning, Rule 

Development and Area Sources Rule Development, (909) 396-2333 

reviewed with Dairo on August 24, 2012

SUMMARY OF COMMUNICATION:

1. The 5 mg/L in Rule 1176 is an exemption level where wastewater can be put into open ponds without 

controls. The general idea is if the water is greater than 5 mg/L, you need to control it.

2. As far as the final disposition of the wastewater, you need to check what the requirements are for 

discharge of oil/grease into the municipal sewer system. The disposal of the wastewater is more of a 

water issue than an air emissions issue. Also, some facilities dispose of the produced water by 

reinjection but they need a prior permit from the Water Quality Control Board.

3. At the time of rule development, he believes they applied a general guideline that $15,000/ton of 

VOC reduced is too expensive for controls.

4. Mr. Teszler does not know if the above $15,000/ton has been updated to more current dollars.
(Reap. Dec. 8409)

Entry No. 1372, etc.

#### United States *v.*Salentine & Co., Inc.

(Decided March 17, 1955)

*Warren E. Burger,*Assistant Attorney General, for the plaintiff.

Defendant not represented by counsel.

Fohd, Judge:

The appeal listed above has been submitted for decision upon a stipulation in which it has been agreed tbat at or *477about the date of exportation there was no foreign, export, or United States value for the involved merchandise, and that the proper basis for finding a value is cost of production. The respective parties have also agreed as to the cost of production.

Accepting said stipulation as a statement of fact, I find and hold the proper cost of production of the items of merchandise specified in schedule *“A,”*hereto attached and made a part hereof, to be the amount set opposite the respective items in said schedule “A.” As to any and all other items of merchandise covered by this appeal, the cost of production is held to be the entered value. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
No. 48112.

#### Protests 60557-K, etc., of Musolino Lo Conte Co. (Boston).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

As the merchandise in question was appraised on August 10, 1938, it was found that the appraisement is subject to the conditions as set forth in section 499 as amended by the Customs Administrative Act of 1938, section 16 (a), effective July 25, 1938. It was therefore held that the plaintiff *421did not “establish that merchandise in the packages or quantities not designated for examination, or not actually examined, was different from that actually examined.” In fact, it was conceded by counsel for the plaintiff that “there was no difference in quality of the goods on the invoices coming under” the Customs Administrative Act. As the plaintiff has failed to sustain the burden of proof the protests were overruled.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Benjamin LAZARO-ALONZO, a/k/a Benjamin Lazaro, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 04-50457.

D.C. No. CR-04-00475-GAF-01.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 12, 2005.*

Decided Sept. 15, 2005.

Ronald L. Cheng, Timothy J. Searight, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Michael Tanaka, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before REINHARDT, RYMER and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM**

Benjamin Lazaros-Alonso appeals from his sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction for being an illegal alien found in the United States following deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a), and (b)(2).

Lazaro-Alonso, who filed his brief with this court before the Supreme Court is*846sued its decision in *United States v. Booker,*— U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), argues that the Sentencing Guidelines are unconstitutional and that the enhancement of his sentence based on a prior conviction must therefore be invalidated. That argument, however, has since been overtaken by *Booker.*Lazaro-Alonso’s contention that his enhancement based on a prior conviction is unconstitutional is foreclosed by this court’s case law. *See United States v. Moreno-Hernandez,*419 F.3d 906, 914-15 n. 8 (9th Cir.2005) (explaining that a district judge’s enhancement of a sentence, based on the fact of a prior conviction under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2, does not raise any Sixth Amendment problems).

Because Lazaro-Alonso was sentenced under the then-mandatory Sentencing Guidelines, and we cannot reliably determine from the record whether the sentence imposed would have been materially different had the district court known that the Guidelines were advisory, we remand to the sentencing court to answer that question, and to proceed pursuant to *United States v. Ameline,*409 F.3d 1073, 1084 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc). *See MorenoHemandez,*at 915-16 (extending *Ameline’s*limited remand procedure to cases involving non-constitutional Booker error).1

REMANDED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.

1

. On remand the district court can also correct the judgment to exclude the reference to 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2). *See United States v. Herrera-Blanco,*232 F.3d 715, 719 (9th Cir.2000).
Served: February 25, 2015 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY 

WASHINGTON, DC 

NATIONAL AIR CARGO GROUP, INC. 

NOTICE OF DEREGISTRATION OF TRADE NAME 

On February 12, 2015, National Air Cargo Group, Inc. d/b/a National Airlines (''National"), a U.S. 

certificated air carrier, 1 requested that the Department deregister the trade name "Murray Air" stating 

that it no longer intends to use the name in its operations. 

We acknowledge National's request and deregister the trade name "Murray Air" effective immediately. 

Dated at Washington, D.C., February 25, 2015. 

TODD M. HOMAN 

Director 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

An electronic version of this document is available on the World Wide Web at: 

http://www.regulations.gov 

1 National's interstate certificate was last reissued by Order 2011-7-15, on July 29, 2011. 
Attachment A 

SERVICE LIST FOR NATIONAL AIR CARGO GROUP, INC. 

PIERRE MURPHY 

COUNSEL FOR 

NATIONAL AIR CARGO INC 

SUITE 590 

1200 NEW HAMPSHIRE A VENUE NW 

WASHINGTON DC 20036 

PETER LYNCH 

ASST CHIEF COUNSEL FOR ENFORCEMENT 

FAA/AGC-300 

800 INDEPENDENCE AVENUE SW 

WASHINGTON DC 20591 

LUTHER J HIPPS 

PRINCIPAL OPERATIONS INSPECTOR 

ORLANDO FSDO 

5950 HAZELTINE NATIONAL DRIVE 

SUITE 500 

CITADEL INTERNATIONAL 

ORLANDO FL 32822 

OFFICE OF AIRLINE INFORMATION 

DOT/RSPA/BTS E-36 

1200 NEW JERSEY A VENUE SE 

WASHINGTON DC 20590 

MARK MAZOR 

CERTIFICATION MANAGER 

FAAAFS-900 

45005 AVIATION DRIVE SUITE 131 

DULLES VA 20166