alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-31 Rule13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications.

 

 

I, Anthony Sfarra,certify that:

 

1. I have reviewedthis report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed inrespect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of the Wells FargoCommercial Mortgage Trust 2016-C34 (the "Exchange Act periodicreports");

 

2. Based on myknowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3. Based on myknowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required tobe provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is includedin the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4. Based on myknowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report underItem 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Actperiodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under theservicing agreements in all material respects; and

 

5. All of the reportson assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securitiesand their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance withservicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in thisreport in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except asotherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliancedescribed in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving thecertifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me bythe following unaffiliated parties:

 

LNR Partners, LLC, asSpecial Servicer, Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee, PentalphaSurveillance LLC, as Operating Advisor, CoreLogic Commercial Real EstateServices, Inc., as Servicing Function Participant, National Tax Search, LLC, asServicing Function Participant, C-III Asset Management LLC, as Special Servicerfor the Marriott Monterey Mortgage Loan, Wilmington Trust, NationalAssociation, as Trustee for the Marriott Monterey Mortgage Loan, Citibank,N.A., as Custodian for the Marriott Monterey Mortgage Loan, Park Bridge LenderServices LLC, as Operating Advisor for the Marriott Monterey Mortgage Loan,CoreLogic Commercial Real Estate Services, Inc., as Servicing FunctionParticipant for the Marriott Monterey Mortgage Loan, and National Tax Search,LLC, as Servicing Function Participant for the Marriott Monterey Mortgage Loan.

 

 

 

Dated: March 23, 2020

 

 

/s/ Anthony Sfarra

 

 

President

(seniorofficer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                               4
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       50
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        837
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   898
<PP&E>                                           9,750
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,074
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   3,574
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,255
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           369  
<OTHER-SE>                                         905
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     3,574
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                               47
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       47
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   212
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (259)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (259)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (259)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (.007)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
No. 43111.

#### Petition 5894-R of Victor Animatograph Corp. (Chicago).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

From the evidence presented it was found that there was no intention to conceal or misrepresent the facts or to deceive the appraiser as to the value of the merchandise in question. The petition was therefore granted.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 26, 2019 

# Order

Clerk April 26, 2019

157210 (83)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

SC: 157210

v COA: 322820

Livingston CC: 12

- 020831

- FH

DENNIS KEITH TOWNE,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

By order of the Chief Justice, the motion of defendant

- appellant to ex tend the time

for filing his supplemental brief is GRANTED. The supplemental brief will be accepted

as timely filed if submitted on or before June 7, 2019

.
-84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72 -70

 34

 36

 38

 40

 42

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

06/18

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 18 Jun 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 39.41 N 76.30 W Meters AGL
No. 45203.

#### Protests 895658-G, etc., of Abraham & Straus, Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of atomizers in chief value of decorated glass similar to those the subject of Abstract 44140. The claim at 60 percent under paragraph 218 (f) was therefore sustained.
No. 65760.

#### Design International Corp. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 58/21804, etc. (New York).

*525Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of wall-hung furniture similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Fabry Associates, Inc.*v. *United States*(45 Cust. Ct. 88, C.D. 2203), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
No. 53226.

#### W. A. Taylor & Co. *v.*United States,

protests 112489-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

For the reasons stated in *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C. D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained. The protests were overruled in all other respects.
# C_2015107EN.01003001.xml

| 30.3.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 107/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.3.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 107/30

---

Action brought on 13 January 2015 — Deutsche Post v OHIM — Media Logistik (PostModern)

(Case T-13/15)

(2015/C 107/39)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Applicant: Deutsche Post AG (Bonn, Germany) (represented by: K. Hamacher and C. Giersdorf, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Media Logistik GmbH (Dresden, Germany)

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: Community word mark ‘PostModern’ — Application No 4 276 821

Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 3 November 2014 in Case R 2063/2013-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order the defendant and, if applicable, the other party to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant and, if applicable, the other party to pay the costs.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
No. 48127.

#### Protests 84978-K, etc., of A. D. Cohen Co., Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of *United States*v. *Armand Schwab*(30 C. C. P. A. 72, C. A. D. 218) the claim at 25 percent under paragraph 1504 (b) (1) was sustained.
Varlen Corporation
    1993 Deferred Incentive Stock Purchase Plan Amendment
                              
          (Amended and Effective February 2, 1998)
                              
                              
     The Varlen Corporation 1993 Deferred Incentive Stock
     Purchase Plan shall be amended by adding the following
     to the end of section 7 (5):
     
Each offeree shall have the right under the Plan to elect to
have shares withheld upon the Exercise Date of each Purchase
Right by the Company in order to pay the applicable
withholding taxes.  An offeree electing to have shares so
withheld to pay taxes shall provide the Company written
notice in advance of the Exercise Date, and such election
shall thereafter be irrevocable.  The fair market value of
shares to be withheld will be the fair market value
(determined as provided in section 7 (1) (i) above) of the
Common Stock as of the date that the amount of tax to be
withheld is determined.
EXHIBIT 10.7

                                  AMENDMENT TO
                         EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

     This Amendment to Executive Employment Agreement is entered into as of this
14th day of April, 1999 by and between Calton, Inc. (the "Employer" or the
"Company"), a New Jersey corporation with offices located at 500 Craig Road,
Manalapan, New Jersey 07726, and Anthony J. Caldarone (the "Executive"), an
individual residing at 162 Anchor Drive, Vero Beach, Florida 32963.

     WHEREAS, the Employer and Executive have entered into an Executive
Employment Agreement dated as of November 21, 1995 (the "Employment Agreement");

     WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Employer have approved an extension
of the term of the Employment Agreement to November 30, 2001;

     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the representations, covenants and
agreements contained herein, and for other good and valuable consideration, the
receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, and intending to be
legally bound hereby, the parties hereto agree as follows:

     1.   Extension of Term. Section 1.1 of the Employment Agreement is hereby
          amended to read in its entirety as follows:

               1.1 Term. The term of this Agreement shall commence on November
          21, 1995 and end on November 30, 2001 (the "Term").

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement on the day and
year first written above.

WITNESS:

------------------------------------              -----------------------------
                                                  Anthony J. Caldarone

ATTEST:                                           CALTON, INC.


                                                  By:
------------------------------------                  --------------------------
Mary Magee, Secretary                                David J. Coppola,
                                                     Vice President
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 86 (Friday, May 4, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 25351]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-8604]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 5778]


Biometric Visa Program Transition to Ten Fingerscans

AGENCY: State Department.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ron Acker, Legislation and Regulations 
Division, Visa Services, Department of State, Washington, DC 20520-
0106, (202) 663-1205 or e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#87e6e4ece2f5f5ebc7f4f3e6f3e2a9e0e8f1"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="dbbab8b0bea9a9b79ba8afbaafbef5bcb4ad">[email protected]</span></a>.
SUMMARY: This public notice announces the change in the standard for 
fingerscans of the Biometric Visa Program from two fingerscans to ten 
fingerscans. The establishment of the Biometric Visa Program was 
announced to the public in December 2004 as a response to the 
requirements established by the Enhanced Border Security and Visa Entry 
Reform Act of 2002. When the program began, available technology only 
allowed for efficient capture and comparisons of two fingerscans. Now, 
improvements in technology allow the Program to incorporate a ten 
fingerscan standard.

Why is the Department planning to take ten fingerscans from visa 
applicants?

    The Biometric Visa Program works closely with the US-VISIT Program 
of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). Both programs currently 
require aliens to submit two fingerscans as part of their respective 
application procedures. In consultation with DHS and the Department of 
Justice, the Department is instituting the ten fingerscan standard to 
improve our ability to detect and thwart persons ineligible for visas 
by raising the accuracy rate in matching fingerscans.

Will this change affect all visa applicants?

    Visa applicants subject to the Biometric Visa Program will be 
required to provide ten fingerscans with their first visa application 
following the transition.

When will this change take place?

    The Department plans to begin deployment of the ten fingerscan 
system to all visa issuing consular posts abroad beginning in April 
2007, with completion scheduled for the end of 2007.

    Dated: April 2, 2007.
Maura Harty,
Assistant Secretary, Consular Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. E7-8604 Filed 5-3-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-06-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 496 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 496

  Commending the Kansas City Kansas Community College Debate Team for 
                 their National Championship victories.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 26, 2006

  Mr. Brownback (for himself and Mr. Roberts) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Commending the Kansas City Kansas Community College Debate Team for 
                 their National Championship victories.

Whereas, in 2006, the Kansas City Kansas Community College debate team won, for 
        a third consecutive year, the 3 national championships in collegiate 
        debate among community colleges;
Whereas the team won a third consecutive national championship at the Phi Rho Pi 
        national tournament for community colleges in 2006;
Whereas, at the 2006 Phi Rho Pi national tournament for community colleges, the 
        team achieved more debate victories per tournament than any other team 
        in the esteemed history of the tournament;
Whereas the team won championship awards in the Policy Team Debate, Lincoln-
        Douglas Debate, and Overall Sweepstakes at the Phi Rho Pi national 
        tournament for community colleges in 2006;
Whereas the team won a third consecutive national championship for community 
        colleges at the Cross Examination Debate Association National Tournament 
        in 2006; and
Whereas the State of Kansas is privileged to benefit from the dedication to 
        education and intercollegiate debate of Kansas City Kansas Community 
        College team head coach Darren Elliot, assistant coaches Skippy Flynn 
        and Adrian Self, and team members Ashley-Michelle Bruce, Ryan Coyne, 
        Clay Crockett, Peter Lawson, Candace Moore, Amanda Montee, Deandre 
        Tolbert, and Garrett Tuck: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) commends the extraordinary contributions of the Kansas 
        City Kansas Community College debate team to the city of Kansas 
        City, Kansas, and the State of Kansas;
            (2) congratulates the team for their national championship 
        victories; and
            (3) offers its best wishes to the team for future success.
                                 <all>
```
#### Rogers Peet Co. *v.*United States

No. 6771.

Entry No. 703377, etc.

Invoices dated Edinburgh, Scotland, June 11, 1941, etc.

Certified June 12, 1941, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., July 15, 1941, etc.

(Decided January 17, 1947)

*Lane & Wallace*and *Lane, Young & Fox*for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Bao,*Assistant Attorney Gener’al, for the defendant.

Cole, Judge (Abstract):

These appeals for reappraisement of various items of merchandise concern the so-called British purchase tax, described in the law of the United Kingdom entitled, “Finance (No. 2) Act 1940 3 & 4 Geo. 6 Ch. 48.” The said tax was held not to be an item to be included in foreign value as defined in section 402 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended by the Customs Administrative Act of 1938 (19 U. S. C. § 1402 (e)). *United States*v. *Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp.,*33 C. C. P. A. 183, C. A. D. 334.

The cited case was incorporated herein by consent of the parties who further agree on a set of facts, embodied in a written stipulation submitting the present eases, showing export value, section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. §1402 (d)), to be the proper basis for appraisement of the instant merchandise, and that such statutory values are the appraised values of the articles in question, less additions made by the importer on entry because of advances in similar cases.
EXHIBIT
32.2








CERTIFICATION
UNDER SECTION 906


OF
THE


SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Unico American Corporation
(the "Company") for the period ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Lester A. Aaron, Treasurer and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to the best of my knowledge:





1.
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
  and





2.
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.











/s/  Lester A.
Aaron





Name:                               Lester
A. Aaron


Title:                                Treasurer,
Chief Financial Officer


Date:                                August
13, 2008














A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to Unico American Corporation, and will be
retained by Unico American Corporation, and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consentto the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Nos. 333-89333, 333-70290 (as amended), 333-44306 (as amended), 333-70210, 333-85340 (as amended), 333-90848 (as amended), 333-114104, 333-116279, and 333-162925) on Form S-8 ofour report dated March 25, 2010, relating to the consolidated financial statements appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Bsquare Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2009. 

/s/    Moss Adams LLP 

Seattle, Washington 

March 25, 2010
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 90 (Thursday, May 10, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 26615]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-8928]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP07-421-000]


Garden Banks Gas Pipeline, LLC; Notice of Proposed Changes in 
FERC Gas Tariff

May 3, 2007.
    Take notice that on May 1, 2007, Garden Banks Gas Pipeline, LLC 
(Garden Banks) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, 
Original Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets, with an effective 
date of June 1, 2007:

Second Revised Sheet No. 19
Second Revised Sheet No. 23
First Revised Sheet No. 23A
First Revised Sheet 23B
Third Revised Sheet No. 25
Second Revised Sheet No. 221
First Revised Sheet No. 226

    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed in accordance with the provisions of 
Sec.  154.210 of the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 154.210). Anyone 
filing an intervention or protest must serve a copy of that document on 
the Applicant. Anyone filing an intervention or protest on or before 
the intervention or protest date need not serve motions to intervene or 
protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5c1a190e1f1332303532390f292c2c332e281c3a392e3f723b332a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="276162756468494b4e494274525757485553674142554409404851">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-8928 Filed 5-9-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>