25776 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 87 / Monday, May 7, 2007 / Notices 

comments online at http:// 

parkplanning.nps.gov/. The documents 

will be on public review for 30 days. 

Our practice is to make comments, 

including names, home addresses, home 

phone numbers, and e-mail addresses of 

respondents, available for public 

review. Individual respondents may 

request that we withhold their names 

and/or home addresses, etc., but if you 

wish us to consider withholding this 

information you must state this 

prominently at the beginning of your 

comments. In addition, you must 

present a rationale for withholding this 

information. This rationale must 

demonstrate that disclosure would 

constitute a clearly unwarranted 

invasion of privacy. Unsupported 

assertions will not meet this burden. In 

the absence of exceptional, 

documentable circumstances, this 

information will be released. We will 

always make submissions from 

organizations or businesses, and from 

individuals identifying themselves as 

representatives of or officials of 

organizations or businesses, available 

for public inspection in their entirety. 

Dated: April 7, 2007. 

Michael D. Snyder, 

Regional Director, Intermountain Region, 

National Park Service. 

[FR Doc. E7–8663 Filed 5–4–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4312–CB–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

National Park Service 

General Management Plan, Rosie the 

Riveter/World War II Home Front 

National Historical Park, Contra Costa 

County, CA; Notice of Termination of 

the Environmental Impact Statement 

SUMMARY: The National Park Service is 

terminating preparation of an 

Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) 

for the General Management Plan, Rosie 

the Riveter/World War II Home Front 

National Historical Park, Richmond, 

California. A Notice of Intent to prepare 

the EIS for the General Management 

Plan (GMP) was published in the 

Federal Register on March 26, 2002. 

The National Park Service has since 

determined that an Environmental 

Assessment (EA) rather than an EIS is 

the appropriate environmental 

documentation for the GMP; this 

determination includes due 

consideration of all public comment and 

other agency information received 

during the public scoping period. 

Background: The Rosie the Riveter/ 

World War II Home Front National 

Historical Park includes the Ford 

Assembly Building, the Richmond 

Shipyard #3 (currently known as the 

Port of Richmond, Terminals 5, 6 and 

7), the Maritime and Ruth Powers Child 

Development Centers, Atchison Village 

housing, Kaiser Field Hospital, Fire 

Station 67A, the Rosie the Riveter 

Memorial, the S.S. Red Oak Victory, and 

city parks referred to in the authorizing 

legislation as Shimada Peace Memorial 

Park, Westshore Park (now known as 

Lucretia Edwards Park), Sheridan 

Observation Point Park, Vincent Park, 

and the Bay Trail-Esplanade. The 

National Park Service (NPS) does not 

own or manage these sites, but is 

authorized to interpret the story of Rosie 

the Riveter and the World War II home 

front, conduct and maintain oral 

histories, operate an education center, 

provide visitor services, provide 

technical assistance, enter into 

agreements to support preservation and 

interpretation, and acquire certain 

structures from willing sellers. The NPS 

will collaborate with the public and 

private owners of these sites to plan for 

and encourage their preservation and 

use. 

Pub. L. 106–352 requires the GMP to 

include a plan to preserve the historic 

setting of the Rosie the Riveter/World 

War II Home Front National Historical 

Park, which must be jointly developed 

and approved by the City of Richmond. 

Accordingly, the GMP will establish the 

overall direction for the park, setting a 

broad vision and management goals for 

managing this partnership park for the 

next 15 to 20 years. The plan was 

originally scoped as an EIS. No concerns 

or issues expressed during public 

scoping and preliminary development 

of the GMP convey either the potential 

for controversy or identify potential for 

significant impacts. 

In the GMP effort to date the 

cooperating park partners and NPS 

planning team have developed three 

alternatives for the historical park. All 

three alternative visions support 

preserving the historic scene while 

providing different approaches for 

visitors to experience and learn about 

Rosie the Riveter and the American 

World War II Home Front. Initial 

analysis of the alternatives has revealed 

neither major effects nor significant or 

unacceptable impacts on the human 

environment, nor any potential for 

impairing park resources and values. 

Potential impacts as may arise from 

implementing any of the alternatives are 

expected to range from negligible to 

moderate in magnitude. All the GMP 

alternative visions provide for 

preserving the historic scene with the 

NPS providing technical assistance to 

help support the decisions and actions 

of the park partners. All uses expected 

to occur under any of the alternative 

visions are deemed to be appropriate. 

For these reasons the NPS determined 

the intensity of conservation planning 

and environmental impact analysis 

needed for the GMP is an EA. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The draft 

GMP and EA will be integrated; the 

combined document is expected to be 

distributed for a 60-day public review 

and comment period in the summer/fall 

of 2007. The NPS will notify the public 

by mail, Web site postings, local and 

regional media, and other means, to 

provide regularly updated information 

on where and how to obtain a copy of 

the EA, how to comment on the EA, and 

the confirmed dates for public meetings 

to be hosted in Richmond and Oakland 

during the 60-day public review period. 

For further information contact Martha 

Lee, Superintendent, Rosie the Riveter/ 

World War II Home Front National 

Historical Park, 1401 Marina Way 

South, Richmond, CA 94804 (telephone: 

(510) 232–5050; e-mail: 

Martha_lee@nps.gov). 

A decision regarding selection of an 

alternative vision for the new GMP is 

expected to be made in the fall/winter 

of 2007. The official responsible for the 

final decision is the Regional Director, 

Pacific West Region, National Park 

Service. Subsequently the official 

responsible for implementing the new 

GMP is the Superintendent, Rosie the 

Riveter/World War II Home Front 

National Historical Park. 

Dated: March 28, 2007. 

Patricia L. Neubacher, 

Acting Regional Director, Pacific West Region. 

[FR Doc. E7–8648 Filed 5–4–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4312–6A–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 337–TA–561] 

In the Matter of Certain Combination 

Motor and Transmission Systems and 

Devices Used Therein, and Products 

Containing the Same; Notice of 

Commission Decision to Review in 

Part and on Review to Modify a Final 

Initial Determination Finding No 

Violation of Section 337 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

the U.S. International Trade 

Commission has determined to review 

in part the presiding administrative law 

judge’s (‘‘ALJ’’) initial determination 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 87 / Monday, May 7, 2007 / Notices 25777 

1The record is defined in § 207.2(f) of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 

CFR 207.2(f)). 

(‘‘ID’’) finding no violation of Section 

337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 

**1337) with regard to the abovecaptioned investigation. On review, the 

Commission has determined to take no 

position on the ALJ’s findings 

concerning the economic prong of the 

domestic industry requirement. 

Accordingly, the Commission has 

terminated the investigation with a 

finding of no violation of Section 337. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Christal A. Sheppard, Esq., Office of the 

General Counsel, U.S. International 

Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., 

Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 

708–2301. Copies of non-confidential 

documents filed in connection with this 

investigation are or will be available for 

inspection during official business 

hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the 

Office of the Secretary, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, 500 E 

Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, 

telephone (202) 205–2000. General 

information concerning the Commission 

may also be obtained by accessing its 

Internet server at http://www.usitc.gov. 

The public record for this investigation 

may be viewed on the Commission’s 

electronic docket (EDIS) at http:// 

edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired 

persons are advised that information on 

this matter can be obtained by 

contacting the Commission’s TDD 

terminal on (202) 205–1810. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This 

investigation was instituted on February 

7, 2006, based on a complaint filed by 

Solomon Technologies, Inc., of Tarpon 

Springs, Florida (‘‘Solomon’’). The 

complaint, as amended, alleged 

violations of Section 337 of the Tariff 

Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1337) in the 

importation into the United States, the 

sale for importation, and the sale within 

the United States after importation of 

certain combination motor and 

transmission systems and devices used 

therein, and products containing same 

by reason of infringement of claims 1–

5, 7, 8, 10, and 12 of United States 

Patent No. 5,067,932 (‘‘the ’932 patent’’). 

71 FR 7574. Only claim 7 of the ’932 

patent was asserted against the 

respondents at the hearing. However, 

Solomon relied upon claim 1 of the 

patent-in-suit to meet the technical 

prong of the domestic industry 

requirement. The amended complaint 

named Toyota Motor Corporation of 

Japan; Toyota Motor Engineering & 

Manufacturing North America, Inc. of 

Erlanger, Kentucky; Toyota Motor 

Manufacturing Kentucky, Inc. of 

Georgetown, Kentucky; and Toyota 

Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc., of Torrance, 

California as respondents. 

On February 13, 2007, the ALJ issued 

an ID finding no violation of Section 

337 with regard to respondents’

products because he found claim 7 to be 

invalid and not infringed. Moreover, he 

found no domestic industry involving 

the asserted patent. Complainants and 

the Office of Unfair Import 

Investigations (‘‘OUII’’) each filed 

petitions for review on February 26, 

2007. Respondents filed a joint reply on 

March 5, 2007. Also on March 5, 2007, 

OUII filed a response to Solomon’s 

petition for review and Solomon filed a 

response to OUII’s petition for review. 

Having considered the petitions for 

review, the oppositions thereto, and the 

relevant portions of the record, the 

Commission has determined to review 

the ID in part. On review, the 

Commission has determined to take no 

position on the ALJ’s findings 

concerning the economic prong of the 

domestic industry requirement. The 

remainder of the ID has become the 

Commission’s final determination. See 

19 CFR 210.42(h). 

This action is taken under the 

authority of section 337 of the Tariff Act 

of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, 

and sections 210.42(c) and (h) of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, 19 CFR 210.42(c) and (h). 

Issued: April 30, 2007. 

By order of the Commission. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. E7–8621 Filed 5–4–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 731–TA–921 (Review)] 

Folding Gift Boxes From China 

Determination 

On the basis of the record 1 developed 

in the subject five-year review, the 

United States International Trade 

Commission (Commission) determines, 

pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff 

Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)) (the 

Act), that revocation of the antidumping 

duty order on folding gift boxes from 

China would be likely to lead to 

continuation or recurrence of material 

injury to an industry in the United 

States within a reasonably foreseeable 

time. 

Background 

The Commission instituted this 

review on December 1, 2006 (71 FR 

69586) and determined on March 6, 

2007 that it would conduct an expedited 

review (72 FR 13512, March 22, 2007). 

The Commission transmitted its 

determination in this review to the 

Secretary of Commerce on April 30, 

2007. The views of the Commission are 

contained in USITC Publication 3917 

(April 2007), entitled Folding Gift Boxes 

From China: Investigation No. 731–TA–

921 (Review). 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: May 1, 2007. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. E7–8623 Filed 5–4–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Inv. No. 337–TA–602] 

In the Matter of Certain GPS Devices 

and Products Containing Same; Notice 

of Investigation 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Institution of investigation 

pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a 

complaint was filed with the U.S. 

International Trade Commission on 

April 2, 2007, under section 337 of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 

U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of Global Locate, 

Inc. of San Jose, California. A letter 

supplementing the complaint was filed 

on April 18, 2007. The complaint 

alleges violations of section 337 in the 

importation into the United States, the 

sale for importation, and the sale within 

the United States after importation of 

certain GPS devices and products 

containing same by reason of 

infringement of certain claims of U.S. 

Patent Nos. 6,417,801, 6,606,346, 

6,651,000, 6,704,651, 6,937,187, and 

7,158,080. The complaint further alleges 

that an industry in the United States 

exists or is in the process of being 

established as required by subsection 

(a)(2) of section 337. 

The complainant requests that the 

Commission institute an investigation 

and, after the investigation, issue a 

permanent exclusion order and 

permanent cease and desist orders. 

ADDRESSES: The complaint and 

supplement, except for any confidential 

information contained therein, are 

available for inspection during official 

business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES