alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                                (18 U.S.C. 1350)


     In connection with the Report of Competitive Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 31, 2007, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
John B. Nano, Chairman, President, Chief Executive Officer, Interim Chief
Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that to my
knowledge:

     1.   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
          or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


                                   /s/ John B. Nano
                                   ----------------
                                   John B. Nano
                                   Chairman, President, Chief Executive Officer,
                                   Interim Chief Financial Officer and Chief
                                   Accounting Officer

                                   December 13, 2007










                  *
                *****
              **-----**
            **-----       COMPETITIVE
          ****----        TECHNOLOGIES
            **=====       Unlocking the Potential of Innovation (R)
              **=====**
                *****
                  *  (R)  Technology Transfer and Licensing Services

                            www.competitivetech.net

                                       25
Exhibit 32

**Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to****Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of National CommerceFinancial Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, William R. Reed, Jr. and John M. Presley, ChiefExecutive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

(1.) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2.) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

|                  |   |      |
|-----------------------|--------|-----------|
| Date: August 12, 2003 |   | By:  | /s/ WILLIAM R. REED, JR. |
|                  |   |      |  |
|                  |   |      | **William R. Reed, Jr.****Chief Executive Officer** |
|                  |   |      |   |
|                  |   |      | /s/ JOHN M. PRESLEY |
|                  |   |      |  |
|                  |   |      | **John M. Presley****Chief Financial Officer** |
No. 49397.

#### Protests 99622-K, etc., of Eclipse Import Corp. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

The record showed that wood is the component of chief value in the darts in question and that they are similar to those involved in Abstract 49053, the record in which was incorporated herein. They were therefore held dutiable at 33)4 percent under paragraph 412 as claimed.
(Reap. Dec. 9412)

#### Morris Friedman *v.*United States

Entry No. 11015.

(Decided May 1, 1959)

*Sharretts, Paley & Garter tor*the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Bout,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Chief Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement relates to certain plywood exported from Finland and entered at the port of Philadelphia, Pa.

. . Stipulated facts, upon which the case is before me, establish that the proper basis for appraisement of the merchandise is foreign value, as defined in section 402(c) of the Tariff Act of 1980, as amended, and that such statutory value therefor is the appraised value, less 4 per centum, and I so hold. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
FW: EPA/State Workgroup re: developing NPDES permits for aquatic pesticide use 

Meredith William H. (DNREC) 

to: 

Jack Faulk, Susan Lewis 

07/14/2009 09:30 PM 

Cc: 

"Capotosto, Paul", "Wolfe, Roger" 

Show Details 

JACK/SUSAN – fyi – of possible interest or use to you or your respective staffs, as your agency and our

Workgroup further plunges into trying to develop NPDES permits for aquatic pesticide use.  

The first 2 documents attached above are from Paul Capotosto, head of Connecticut’s mosquito control program

– one describes the state’s ability to issue permits for aquatic pesticide use, and other pertains to general

statutes for mosquito control work in Connecticut.  In keeping with this second theme, I’ve also attached above

Delaware’s state enabling statute that authorizes us to perform mosquito control work, along with some

prescriptions in statute for how it must be done.  You already have some pertinent parts of this relative to our

mosquitocide spraying as contained in the Power Point slides that you left with on June 30th, but I thought that I

might as well now give you our entire state statute (which was last revised and modernized a bit by our General

Assembly back in 2007).  

Cheers, BILL.   

Page 1 of 1

file://C:\Documents and Settings\jfaulk\Local Settings\Temp\notesFCBCEE\~web1328.htm 5/12/2010
Case No. 9,959.

#### MURRAY v. DOWLING.

[1 Cranch, C. C. 151.] 1

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

Dec. Term, 1803.

Witness — Privileged Communications — Attorney.

An attorney at law cannot be compelled to disclose any fact the knowledge of which has been communicated to him by his client.

Replevin. Avowry for rent-arrear — plea in bar, no rent-arrear — general replication and issue. .

Mr. Peacock requested a postponement of the tidal on account of. the absence of the person who had possession of the original lease.

Mr. Hewitt, for the plaintiff, pressed the trial.

Mr. Peacock waived his application for a postponement, and offered ready.

On the trial Mr. Peacock being sworn as a witness, Mr. Hewitt asked.him whether there was a lease in writing. .• Mr; Peacock stated that his knowledge upon, that subject was derived from his client, in his capacity as counsel, and prayed the opinion of the court whether he was bound to answer.

TBÜED COURT

was of opinion he ought not to be compelled to answer, and sustained the objection.
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY QENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

o-CMAnll 

a-n .nmmu 

TM8 OPnIOH mmuux 

UvmmLm o?nrosM-Wl 

P. cllatan owloy, Imeotr 

eu Htlutiu Dlr1rtoa 

an Ho. 0-lJ41, detod 

0r uO0~0 mv ~0d 

8OOtiOA 2 b, WbUatiOn (2) 

if%~~~~lrltlu of tho b\rThey l r o z a r e, 

uro a nd/or rrkb ly a nd r d.0 o f 

8ubrootion (3) of Uotlon 2 b, ~~JOJD 14mtloal 

01Ulon. Thorororo for uoh ll0eBm.'1**uo& a bead maot 

k mppued. 
AP?8ovnl OPIHIOH CaEHITTti 

4 / 8l / .W.cD., h o lr na
**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|  | 1. | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | 2. | Information                contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,                the                financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:                September 11, 2008 | By:                                                                              | /s/ Arthur                F.                Trudel                                          |
|-----------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                    | Arthur                F. Trudel                                                            |
|                                    | Senior                Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and                Secretary |

----
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    Exhibit 10.5

Stanford Microdevices
522 Almanor Ave.
Sunnyvale, CA  94086
408-616-5400

November 1, 1999

Dear Mr. Gary Gianatasio,

This is to confirm the verbal offer of the position as Vice President - Wireless
Infrastructure Products Unit of Stanford Microdevices, Inc. In this position you
will report to the COO in the SMI corporate headquarters located in Sunnyvale,
CA.

Your responsibilities will include the following:

GENERAL MANAGEMENT OF WIRELESS BUSINESS UNIT

o    Marketing

o    Product Marketing

o    New Product Planning and Development

o    Applications Engineering

o    Financial Operations of Business Unit

<TABLE>
<S>  <C>                           <C>
Your compensation is as follows:

o    Base salary (annual):         $180,000 with annual reviews

o    Incentive Bonus (annual):     Up to 40%

o    Stock Options:                130,000 shares at expected strike price of $1.50

o    401K Eligible on 12/1/99

o    Other Benefits:               Standard executive SMI medical, dental,
                                   vacation benefits

Other agreements include:

o    Change of Control:            In the event that SMI is acquired (>51%
                                   change of control), and the acquiring party
                                   does not have an equivalent ISO plan, vesting
                                   acceleration for outstanding options will occur.

o    Responsibilities:             In the event that you are terminated for any
                                   reason other than cause, or in the event that
                                   a diminution of duties occurs for any reason
                                   other than cause, you will receive four
                                   months of base salary as compensation and
                                   additional one year of options will be
                                   vested.
</TABLE>

I am confident that you will make a valuable contribution to Stanford's success
and I am anxious to have you join our team.

<PAGE>   2

Please sign below as an acceptance of this offer and return a signed copy to me
at your earliest convenience. Please also indicate how soon you can start. If
you have any questions regarding the terms of this offer or any other questions
please contact me directly at 408-616-5401.

Welcome to Stanford Microdevices, Inc.

Sincerely,



Gerald Quinnell
COO

I accept the terms of this offer letter.

I intend to start on                                    11-24-99
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                                          Date

                                                  /s/ GARY GIANATASIO
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                                    Gary Gianatasio



                                      -2-
Exhibit 32.2   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002    In connection with the Report of Competitive Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Johnnie D. Johnson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   /s/ Johnnie D. Johnson Johnnie D. Johnson Chief Financial Officer  August 15, 2011  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Competitive Technologies and will be retained by Competitive Technologies and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
May 5, 1952

No. 56645.

protest 177084-K (A).

#### F. & S. Novelty Mfg. Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Abstract 56476. (Initial No. 176748-K.) Plaintiff’s application for rehearing granted.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Nuclear Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. 50-247] 

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) has granted the request of Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. (the licensee) to withdraw its July 10, 2006, application for proposed amendment to Facility Operating License No. DPR-26 for Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit No. 2, located in Westchester County, New York. 

The proposed amendment would have revised the Technical Specifications pertaining to spent fuel cask loading operations. 

                    The Commission had previously issued a Notice of Consideration of Issuance of Amendment published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on August 29, 2006 (71 FR 51227). However, by letter dated April 11, 2007, the licensee withdrew the proposed change.                 

                    For further details with respect to this action, see the application for amendment dated July 10, 2006, and the licensee's letter dated April 11, 2007, which withdrew the application for license amendment. Documents may be examined, and/or copied for a fee, at the NRC's Public Document Room (PDR), located at One White Flint North, Public File Area O1 F21, 11555 Rockville Pike (first floor), Rockville, Maryland. Publicly available records will be accessible electronically from the Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Public Electronic Reading Room on the internet at the NRC Web site,                     *http://www.nrc.gov/​reading-rm.html.*                     Persons who do not have access to ADAMS or who encounter problems in accessing the documents located in ADAMS should contact the NRC PDR Reference staff by telephone at 1-800-397-4209, or 301-415-4737 or by e-mail to                     *pdr@nrc.gov.*

 Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 1st day of May 2007.

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 

John P. Boska, 

Senior Project Manager, Plant Licensing Branch I-1, Division of Operating Reactor Licensing, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.   

 [FR Doc. E7-8658 Filed 5-4-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
**Exhibit 13.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Pursuantto 18 U.S.C § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, the undersigned officer of Open Joint Stock Company Long-Distance andInternational Telecommunications Rostelecom (the “Company”) hereby certifies,to such officer’s knowledge, that:

(i)    theaccompanying annual report on Form 20-F of the Company for the yearended December 31, 2005 (the “Report”) fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable,of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii)   the information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.
| Date: June 30, 2006 |                                      |
|--------------------------|--------------------------------------|
|                     | /s/ Roman A. Frolov                  |   |
|                     | Roman A. Frolov                      |
|                     | Chief Accountant (CFO)               |
|                     | OJSC Long-Distance and International |
|                     | Telecommunications Rostelecom        |

 

----
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14**  **- 6197** 

TERRANCE ADAMS , Petitioner

– Appellant ,

v. ROBERT M. STEVENSON, III, Warden Broad River Correctional Institution , Respondent

– Appellee , and
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA , Respondent
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Columbia

. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr. , District Judge. ( 3:12

- cv - 01482

- JFA )

Submitted : June 26, 2014 Decided: July 1, 2014

Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. Terrance Adams, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Senior Assistant Attorney General, William Edgar Salter, III, Assistant Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.2 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.3 PER CURIAM: Terrance Adams seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition and the court’s order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion . The order s are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.
§ 2253(c)(1) (A) (2012) . A certificate of appealability will not is sue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that th e district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prison er must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Adams has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal4 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and a rgument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
### The lignite deposits of the Cheyenne River and Standing Rock Indian Reservations Corson, Dewey, And Ziebach counties, South Dakota and Sioux county, North Dakota

By: Norman M. Denson

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/cir78

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

No abstract available.

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.