alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration 

          - [TA-W-61,238] 

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on April 3, 2007 in response to a petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers of Quality Transparent Bag Company, Inc., Bay City, Michigan. 

The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated. 

Signed at Washington, DC, this 23rd day of April, 2007. 

Linda G. Poole, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. E7-8464 Filed 5-2-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
y 

gy 

500 Metro Street, 12 ~ Floor, 

Capital Plaza Tower Street 

Frankfort, Kentucky 4060 1 - 1 957 

Dear Mr. Lyons: 

Enclosed is the final end-of-year report for your agency's FY 201 1 Air Pollution Control grant 

authorized by§ 105 of the Clean Air Act. This report outlines your agency's various grant commitments 

and their status. Since there were no issues and no adjustments necessary your report is now finalized. 

This letter documents the conclusion of the joint evaluation process required by 40 Code of Federal 

Regulations 35.1 15 and identified as a commitment in your FY 201 1 Air Planning Agreement under 

Cross Cutting Issues. 

We appreciate the progress you made in FY 201 1 and look forward to continuing our joint efforts to 

protect and improve air quality. If you have any questions regarding your grant, please contact Stuart 

Perry at (404) 562-8980 or Marie Persinger at (404) 562-9048. 

Sincerely, 

R. ~ou&as Neeley 

Chief Air Toxics and Monitoring Branch 

Air, Pesticides, and Toxics 

Management Division 

Enclosure 

Internet Address (URL) http:llwww.epa.gov 

Recycled/Recyclable Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on Recycled Paper (Minimum 30% Postconsumer)
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v. EDDIE GRIFFIN, Jr., Private E-2, U. S. Army, Appellant

4 USCMA 699, 16 CMR 278

No. 4701

Decided September 24, 1954

Lt Col Herman P. Goebel, Jr., U. S. Army, Maj Edwin Doran, U. S. Army, Capt Albert C. Malone, Jr., U. S. Army, and 1st Lt Ivan E. Barris, U. S. Army, for Appellant.

Lt Col William R. Ward, U. S. Army, 1st Lt Benjamin C. Flannagan, U. S. Army, and 1st Lt Paul D. Heyman, U. S. Army, for Appellee.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:

The accused was convicted of wrongful possession and wrongful use of a habit-forming narcotic drug, in violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 50 USC § 728. His sentence to dishonorable discharge, total forfeitures, and confinement at hard labor for two years has been affirmed by intermediate appellate tribunals. We granted his petition for review to determine the sufficiency of the evidence.

The findings of the trial court were based principally upon the results of a urinalysis to which the accused voluntarily submitted, and the results of chemical tests upon powders found in his possession. Before that forum, the accused neither objected to the introduction of the results of these tests, nor did he testify in his own behalf. He now challenges the scientific reli*700ability of the method of identifying the drugs in question. Our disposition of this contention is determined by United States v. Ford, 4 USCMA 611, 16 CMR 185, wherein we held that the results of such tests are legally sufficient to support a finding of guilty.

The decision of the board of review is affirmed.
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed October 27, 2021.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D20-573

Lower Tribunal No. 17-14907

________________

Andrey Shklyaev and Century Cab Corp.,

Appellants,

vs.

Rebecca Saunders,

Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Spencer 

Eig, Judge.

Conroy Simberg, and Hinda Klein (Hollywood), for appellants.

The Pivnik Law Firm, and Jerome A. Pivnik, for appellee.

Before HENDON, GORDO, and BOKOR, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Low Wind Speed Technology Phase II: Developing Techniques to Evaluate the Designs and 

Operating Environments of Offshore Wind Turbines in the Mid-Atlantic and Lower Great 

Lakes Regions

AWS Truewind, LLC

Project Description: Coastal and offshore locales are favored regions for wind 

power use because of their generally high wind resource and low surface roughness. Offshore sites in the United States have recently attracted considerable 

attention; however, few representative observations have been made. 

The objective of this study is to characterize the offshore wind and wave environments of the Atlantic and lower Great Lakes regions by estimating the available 

wind power resource in the offshore environment and performing physically 

consistent modeling of the dynamics within and above the air-sea interface. The 

results will help the offshore wind industry more precisely quantify the design 

load conditions at specific sites, which will enable projects to be engineered and 

operated more cost effectively and with lower risk. The study will combine: 

• An assimilation of monitoring and observation network data 

• A six-month intensive field measurement campaign at an offshore platform 

• A modeling analysis and verification study of the coastal wave and 

meteorological regimes 

• Initial steps toward the development of a buoy-adapted atmospheric profiling 

system

Project Type: Conceptual Design Study

Total Project Budget: $600,000

Industry Cost Share: $400,000 ($200,000 LIPA, $200,000 NYSERDA)

DOE Cost Share: $200,000

Planned Project Duration: September 2004–December 2005

Contacts:

NREL: AWS Truewind, LLC:

Walt Musial, NREL Bruce Bailey, AWS Truewind, LLC

1617 Cole Blvd. CESTM, 251 Fuller Road 

Golden, Colorado 80401 Albany, New York 12203

303-384-6956 518-437-8659

walt_musial@nrel.gov bbailey@awstruewind.com 

Current Status: Project Underway

Meteorologic equipment on Ambrose light station 

collects the wind and wave data used for the 

reference database. 

A Strong Portfolio for a Strong America • Energy efficiency and clean, renewable energy will mean a stronger economy, a cleaner environment, and greater energy 

independence for America. Working with a wide array of state, community, industry, and university partners, the U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Energy Efficiency 

and Renewable Energy invests in a diverse portfolio of energy technologies.

For more information contact EERE Information Center • 1-877-EERE-INF (1-877-337-3463) • www.eere.energy.gov

Produced for the U.S. Department of Energy by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, a DOE national laboratory

Printed with a renewable-source ink on paper containing at least 50% wastepaper, including 10% post consumer waste.

DOE/GO-102006-2201

March 2006
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 124 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 124

   Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the National Peace 
                      Officers' Memorial Service.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 20, 2007

Ms. Norton (for herself, Mr. Graves, Mr. Hoyer, Mr. Moran of Virginia, 
Mr. Van Hollen, Mr. Cummings, Mr. Wynn, Mr. Wolf, and Mr. Tom Davis of 
  Virginia) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
     referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
   Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the National Peace 
                      Officers' Memorial Service.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. USE OF CAPITOL GROUNDS FOR NATIONAL PEACE OFFICERS' MEMORIAL 
              SERVICE.

    (a) In General.--The Grand Lodge of the Fraternal Order of Police 
and its auxiliary (in this resolution referred to as the ``sponsor'') 
shall be permitted to sponsor a public event, the 26th annual National 
Peace Officers' Memorial Service (in this resolution referred to as the 
``event''), on the Capitol Grounds, in order to honor the law 
enforcement officers who died in the line of duty during 2006.
    (b) Date of Event.--The event shall be held on May 15, 2007, or on 
such other date as the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the 
Committee on Rules and Administration of the Senate jointly designate.

SEC. 2. TERMS AND CONDITIONS.

    (a) In General.--Under conditions to be prescribed by the Architect 
of the Capitol and the Capitol Police Board, the event shall be--
            (1) free of admission charge and open to the public; and
            (2) arranged not to interfere with the needs of Congress.
    (b) Expenses and Liabilities.--The sponsor shall assume full 
responsibility for all expenses and liabilities incident to all 
activities associated with the event.

SEC. 3. EVENT PREPARATIONS.

    Subject to the approval of the Architect of the Capitol, the 
sponsor is authorized to erect upon the Capitol Grounds such stage, 
sound amplification devices, and other related structures and 
equipment, as may be required for the event.

SEC. 4. ENFORCEMENT OF RESTRICTIONS.

    The Capitol Police Board shall provide for enforcement of the 
restrictions contained in section 5104(c) of title 40, United States 
Code, concerning sales, advertisements, displays, and solicitations on 
the Capitol Grounds, as well as other restrictions applicable to the 
Capitol Grounds, in connection with the event.
                                 <all>
```
### UAS/UAV Aircraft Pre-Flight Check List

 Ensure that all parts and functions of UAV aircraft are in working condition.  Ensure that the remote controller, battery, and mobile device for controlling phantom are fully charged.  Ensure that there is no foreign objects stuck in lens, micro sd card is inside camera, gimbal can rotate freely before powering on.  Ensure propellers are securely mounted and motors are starting functionally and normally.  Ensure signal to remote and UAV is connected and stable. Ensure auto return home flight is configured in event of loss of signal.  Calibrate compass and gps for proposed flight. Map proposed flight, parameters of flight, outline ideal flight trajectory and map out positions before flight.  Ensure DJI app, aircraft and controller firmware is updated to the latest version.  Ensure flight area is outside of no fly zones, in a permitted area. Check weather and wind conditions for permissible flight.  Observe local regulations, obtain appropriate authorization, and understand risks of flight.
A97A0381.

#### THOMASON v. EXXON CORPORATION.

(513 SE2d 520)

Decided March 4, 1999.

*Coppedge, Leman & Ward, Warren N. Coppedge, Jr., David L. McGuffey,*for appellant.

*Enoch Overby,*for appellee.

Pope, Presiding Judge.

The decision of the Court of Appeals in this case was reversed by the Supreme Court in *Exxon Corp. v. Thomason,*269 Ga. 761 (504 SE2d 676) (1998). Accordingly, the decision in *Thomason v. Exxon Corp.,*227 Ga. App. 44 (487 SE2d 605) (1997), which was originally authored by Presiding Judge Birdsong, is hereby vacated, and the judgment of the Supreme Court is made the judgment of this Court. Therefore, in accordance with the opinion of the Supreme Court, the ruling of the trial court is affirmed.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Ruffin and Eldridge, JJ, concur.*
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 86 (Friday, May 4, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 25325]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-8512]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[FEMA-1689-DR]


California; Amendment No. 1 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of California (FEMA-1689-DR), dated March 13, 2007, and 
related determinations.

DATES: Effective Date: April 20, 2007.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Magda Ruiz, Disaster Assistance 
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, 
(202) 646-2705.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of California is hereby amended to include the following 
areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by 
the catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his 
declaration of March 13, 2007:

    Kings, Madera, and Merced Counties for Disaster Unemployment 
Assistance and Food Commodities.
    Stanislaus County for Disaster Unemployment Assistance.
    All counties within the State of California are eligible to 
apply for assistance under the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community 
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund Program; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services Program; 97.034, 
Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management 
Assistance; 97.048, Individuals and Households Housing; 97.049, 
Individuals and Households Disaster Housing Operations; 97.050 
Individuals and Households Program--Other Needs, 97.036, Public 
Assistance Grants; 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.)

R. David Paulison,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. E7-8512 Filed 5-3-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-10-P
<PAGE>   1
                       UGI UTILITIES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
        COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES - EXHIBIT 12.1
                             (THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                         
                                                Three                                                
                                                Months
                                                Ended                     Year Ended September 30,            
                                              December 31,    -------------------------------------------------
                                                 1998          1998          1997          1996          1995
                                                -------       -------       -------       -------       -------
<S>                                           <C>             <C>           <C>           <C>           <C>
EARNINGS:
Earnings before income taxes                    $21,014       $57,007       $63,275       $61,717       $39,759
Interest expense                                  4,384        17,383        16,696        15,921        16,632
Amortization of debt discount and expense            54           200           176           173           206
Interest component of rental expense                335         1,624         1,887         1,838         1,604
                                                -------       -------       -------       -------       -------
                                                $25,787       $76,214       $82,034       $79,649       $58,201
                                                =======       =======       =======       =======       =======

FIXED CHARGES:
Interest expense                                $ 4,384       $17,383       $16,696       $15,921       $16,632
Amortization of debt discount and expense            54           200           176           173           206
Allowance for funds used during
      construction (capitalized interest)             7            39           114           107            65
Interest component of rental expense                335         1,624         1,887         1,838         1,604
                                                -------       -------       -------       -------       -------
                                                $ 4,780       $19,246       $18,873       $18,039       $18,507
                                                =======       =======       =======       =======       =======

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                 5.39          3.96          4.35          4.42          3.14
                                                =======       =======       =======       =======       =======
</TABLE>
# C_2016136EN.01004501.xml

| 18.4.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 136/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.4.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 136/45

---

Order of the General Court of 16 February 2016 — Ludwig Bertram v OHIM — Seni Vita (Sanivita)

(Case T-58/15) (1)

1

(2016/C 136/63)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Fifth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 118, 13.4.2015.

1

---
# C_2017070EN.01001702.xml

| 6.3.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 70/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.3.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 70/17

---

Judgment of the General Court of 17 January 2017 — LP v Europol

(Case T-719/15 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - Civil Service - Temporary staff - Fixed-term contract - Decision not to renew - Implied rejection decision - Decision rejecting the complaint - Duty to state reasons - Duty to have regard for the welfare of staff))

(2017/C 070/24)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Appellant: LP (represented by: M. Velardo, lawyer)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Police Office (Europol) (represented by: D. Neumann and C. Falmagne, acting as Agents, and D. Waelbroeck and A. Duron, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal lodged against the order of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal [confidential]
   (2), and seeking annulment of that order.

[confidential]

2

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders LP to bear his/her own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Police Office (Europol) in the present instance. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders LP to bear his/her own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Police Office (Europol) in the present instance.

---

(1)  OJ C 59, 15.2.2016.

1

(2)  Confidential information hidden.

2

---
No. 54882.

#### Carson Pirie Scott & Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 542238-G, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Rao, J.

The protests were dismissed.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 86 (Friday, May 4, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 25317-25318]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-8617]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Disease, Disability, and Injury Prevention and Control Special 
Emphasis Panel (SEP): Behavioral Assessments and Rapid HIV Testing 
Among African American Adolescents and Adults, Men Who Have Sex With 
Men and Other Groups at Risk for HIV Infection, Funding Opportunity 
Announcement (FOA) Number PS 07-001, and Rapid HIV Testing in Community 
Mental Health Settings Serving African Americans, FOA PS 07-005

    In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention (CDC) announces the aforementioned meeting.

    Time and Date: 12:30 p.m.-4:30 p.m., May 25, 2007 (Closed).
    Place: Teleconference.
    Status: The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance 
with provisions set forth in Section 552b(c)(4) and (6), Title 5 
U.S.C., and the Determination of the Director, Management Analysis 
and Services Office, CDC, pursuant to Public Law 92-463.
    Matters to be Discussed: The meeting will include the review, 
discussion, and evaluation of ``Behavioral Assessments and Rapid HIV 
Testing Among African American Adolescents and Adults, Men Who Have 
Sex With Men and Other Groups at Risk for HIV Infection,'' FOA 
Number PS 07-001, and ``Rapid HIV Testing in Community Mental Health 
Settings Serving African Americans,'' FOA PS 07-005.
    Contact Person For More Information: J. Felix Rogers, Ph.D., 
M.P.H., Scientific Review Administrator, Extramural Research Program 
Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton 
Road, NE, MS

[[Page 25318]]

E05, Atlanta, GA 30333, telephone 404.639.6101.
    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining 
to announcements of meetings and other committee management 
activities, for both CDC and the Agency for Toxic Substances and 
Disease Registry.

    Dated: April 27, 2007.
Elaine L. Baker,
Acting Director, Management Analysis and Services Office Centers for 
Disease Control and Prevention.
 [FR Doc. E7-8617 Filed 5-3-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
No. 53798.

petition 6670-R (Tampa).

#### Casa Elsasser *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

A partner of the petitioner testified that at the time of purchase the exporter allowed him a 5 percent discount, the consular invoice and the commercial invoice both indicating the discount in question; that the shipment was one of the first importations made by the petitioner and at that time he did not know whether or not duty should be paid on the purchase price; and that entry was made at the price paid for the merchandise. On the record presented it was held that the petitioner acted without intention to conceal or misrepresent the facts and that it did not intend to defraud the revenue of the United States or to deceive the appraiser as to the value of the merchandise. The petition was therefore granted.

Cole, J.; concurring.