alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2022095EN.01002101.xml

| 28.2.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 95/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.2.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 95/21

---

Judgment of the General Court of 21 December 2021 — Gmina Kosakowo v Commission

(Case T-209/15) (1)

(State aid - Airport infrastructure - Public funding by the municipalities of Gdynia and Kosakowo for setting up the Gdynia-Kosakowo Airport - Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery - Advantage - Market economy operator principle - Effect on trade between Member States - Adverse effect on competition - Recovery - Obligation to state reasons)

(2022/C 95/26)

Language of the case: Polish

Parties

Applicant: Gmina Kosakowo (Poland) (represented by: M. Leśny, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: S. Noë, K. Herrmann and A. Stobiecka-Kuik, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU for annulment of Commission Decision (EU) 2015/1586 of 26 February 2015 on measure SA.35388 (13/C) (ex 13/NN and ex 12/N) — Poland — Setting up the Gdynia-Kosakowo airport (OJ 2015 L 250, p. 165).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Gmina Kosakowo, in addition to bearing its own costs, to pay those incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Gmina Kosakowo, in addition to bearing its own costs, to pay those incurred by the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 205, 22.6.2015.

---
# C_2015320EN.01005601.xml

| 28.9.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 320/56 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.9.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 320/56

---

Action brought on 14 August 2015 — ZZ v European Commission

(Case F-115/15)

(2015/C 320/78)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: N. de Montigny and J.-N. Louis, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Application for annulment of the Commission’s decision limiting the applicant’s pension rights, for a declaration that the conclusions adopted by the Heads of Administration on 16 June 2005 are inapplicable in so far as they limit the additional pension rights to be credited to the applicant’s pension and for an order that the defendant is to pay the applicant the retirement pension to which he is entitled.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Tribunal should:

| — | declare inapplicable to the present case the conclusions of the Heads of Administration, No 240/05 of 16 June 2005, in so far as they limit, on a pro rata basis, to the actual contribution period as opposed to a complete career as an official, the additional pension rights to be credited to the applicant’s pension in relation to the management allowance; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare inapplicable to the present case the conclusions of the Heads of Administration, No 240/05 of 16 June 2005, in so far as they limit, on a pro rata basis, to the actual contribution period as opposed to a complete career as an official, the additional pension rights to be credited to the applicant’s pension in relation to the management allowance;

| — | annul the contested decision, in so far as it limits the applicant’s pension rights in respect of the management allowance on a pro rata basis to the contribution period, as opposed to the number of years of pensionable service in a complete career as an official; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision, in so far as it limits the applicant’s pension rights in respect of the management allowance on a pro rata basis to the contribution period, as opposed to the number of years of pensionable service in a complete career as an official;

| — | order the Commission to pay the applicant the retirement pension to which he is entitled, subject to deduction of the pension actually paid, together with default interest calculated at the rate applied by the ECB for its standard transactions, increased by two points; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the applicant the retirement pension to which he is entitled, subject to deduction of the pension actually paid, together with default interest calculated at the rate applied by the ECB for its standard transactions, increased by two points;

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs.

---
### Reconnaissance for radioactive deposits in south-central Alaska, 1947-49

By: Robert M. MoxhamArthur E. NelsonM.G. White

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/cir184

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
No. 42027.

#### Protest 86987-G of R. H. Macy & Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of *Amrein*v. *United States*(T. D. 49551), *Pustet*v. *United Stales*(13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 530, T. D. 41396), and *United States*v. *Smith*(12 id. 384, T. D. 40544) Normandy laces, embroidered galloons, and embroidered articles in part of lace were held dutiable at 75 percent under paragraph 1430.
Exhibit 32.2   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002    In connection with the Report of Competitive Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Johnnie D. Johnson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.    Johnnie D. Johnson Chief Financial Officer  November 16, 2012  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Competitive Technologies and will be retained by Competitive Technologies and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE>            5
<LEGEND>
Note: This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Form 10-Q for the Quarter Ended March 31, 1997 and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>        1,000
       
<S>                        <C>              
<PERIOD-TYPE>               9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                           JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                             MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                      $ 15,762
<SECURITIES>                                  29,079
<RECEIVABLES>                                 10,921
<ALLOWANCES>                                     931
<INVENTORY>                                        0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              59,090
<PP&E>                                        24,679
<DEPRECIATION>                                15,797
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               122,569
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         25,812
<BONDS>                                       20,428
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                       4,336
<OTHER-SE>                                    63,698
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 122,569
<SALES>                                            0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              89,892
<CGS>                                              0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 58,789
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               3,426 <F1>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 298
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1,060
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                9,868
<INCOME-TAX>                                   4,344
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            5,524
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                   5,524
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    .94
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    .94
<FN>
<F1> Represents the total depreciation and amortization expense, but does not
include S,G&A expenses of $17,900.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
' tviETRO AIR QUALITY MGMT DIS ST. 3RD FLOOR ..a(;ARET JORDAN . ;AMEF!TO CA 95 81 4--1 90 8
GLARAIION OF PUBLICATION ( (;. C. P. 2015.5)


### OUNTY OF SACRAMENTO ".TA.TE OF CALIFORNIA
-.rn a citizen of the United States and . rrvsidont of the County aforesaid; I .in over the age of eighteen years,

~ nd not a party to or interested in the .I)ove entitled matter. I am the printer 111rl principal clerk of the publisher of _. Sacramento Bee, printed and ....flished in the City of Sacramento, .!;nly of Sacramento, State of Cali- ...., daily, for which said newspaper

~ 

### c^n ad'ludged a newspaper of =G11 Girr,ulation by the Superior ,n (,f the County of Sacramento, . .le of Cali(ornia, under the date of .ptember 26, 1994, Action No.

, •:)071; that the notice of which the .-.nocxed is a printed copy, has been .!imlished in each issue thereof and in any supplement thereof on the ii,wing clates, to wit: c:otember 26. 2006

.^rtify (or doclare) under penalty of :-riury that the foregoing is true and .nect and thiat this declaration was •;c.uted lt eF aento, California, - 3rntemi

~

er 2 

### 6 . 2006. . 

### (Signature)
<PAGE>

                                                                     Exhibit 4.4

                          USA VIDEO INTERACTIVE CORP.
                          ---------------------------

                            SHARE OPTION AGREEMENT
                                  (DIRECTORS)

TO:   ________________________

DATE: __________________, 2000

     USA VIDEO INTERACTIVE CORP. (the "Corporation") is pleased to advise you
that by resolution of the Board of Directors (the "Board") of the Corporation
dated _____________, 2000, you have been granted options to subscribe for
and purchase from treasury common shares (the "Shares") of the Corporation.

     The Share Option Plan (the "Plan") has been constituted pursuant to a
Resolution of the Board dated January 2, 1990, and confirmed by the shareholders
of the Corporation at the Annual General Meeting on April 27, 1990. This
agreement incorporates by reference the terms and conditions of the Plan, a copy
of which has been provided to you.

     You have been granted the option to purchase a total of ________ Shares at
an exercise price of $ _________ U.S. per Share. All rights to purchase Shares
pursuant to these options shall expire at the close of business on
__________________, 200____.

     You may exercise this option by delivering to the Corporation a notice
specifying the number of Shares in respect of which your option is being
exercised and a certified cheque for the option price of the Shares being
purchased. Upon receipt of the certified cheque the Corporation shall instruct
its transfer agent to issue a share certificate to you.

                                       Yours very truly,

                                       USA VIDEO INTERACTIVE CORP.


                                       Per:__________________________

SIGNED, SEALED AND DELIVERED            ACCEPTED AND AGREED TO this
in the presence of:                     ____ day of _________________, 2000.

____________________________            at ____________________________________.
Signature of Witness

____________________________            ________________________________________
Name of Witness (Print)

SHARE OPTION AGREEMENT-DIRECTOR
No. 50276.

#### Petition 6391-R of New York Merchandise Co., Inc. (Los Angeles)

Opinion by

Cline, J.

An appeal to reappraisement was taken and the appraised value affirmed (Reap. Dec. 5789). The vice president of the petitioner testified that the entry was made under his direction; that he had instructed his employees to disclose all facts and to take all precautions that the proper entered values be given; and that he had no information that the value of 1.80 yen was incorrect. After consideration of the evidence in this ease, it was held that the petitioner acted without intention to misrepresent the facts or to defraud the revenue of the United States or to deceive the appraiser as to the value of the goods. The petition was therefore granted.
(Reap. Dec. 9420)

#### Joseph Rossa *v.*United States

Entry No. DE 33675.

(Decided May 12, 1959)

Plaintiff not represented by counsel.

*George Goehr an Dowd,*Assistant Attorney General *(Murray Slclaroff,*trial attorney), for tbe defendant.

Wilson, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement relates to certain willow baskets exported from Yugoslavia and entered at the port of Los Angeles.

It appears that the involved merchandise was appraised at the invoice value, namely, $4,930, which amount included a deductible item for freight from Yugoslavia to Italy, where the goods were loaded for shipment to this country. The parties herein have agreed and stipulated that the proper value of the merchandise for appraisement purposes is $4,190, as represented by the entered value.

On the agreed facts, I find that the proper value of the involved merchandise for appraisement purposes is the entered value, namely, $4,190.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
August 23, 1939

No. 42009.

#### Protest 950829-G of Sam’l Frankel Silk Corp.

C. D. 172. Application by plaintiff for rehearing denied.
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Corporate Trust Services**

  MAC R1204-010  9062 Old Annapolis Road  Columbia, MD 21045  Tel: 410 884 2000  Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|               |                                                                                                                             |   |
|               |                                                                                                                             |   |

 

 

Re: Annual Statement of Compliancefor JPMDB Commercial Mortgage Securities Trust 2016-C2 Commercial MortgagePass-Through Certificates, Series 2016-C2

 

Per the Pooling and ServicingAgreement dated as of May 1, 2016 (the "Agreement"), the undersigned,a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as CertificateAdministrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows as of andfor the year ending December 31, 2016 (the "Reporting Period"):

 

(a) A review of Wells Fargo'sactivities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under theAgreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and

 

(b) To the best of suchofficer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of itsobligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

 

February 27, 2017

 

 

 /s/ Brian Smith

BRIAN SMITH

Vice President

  

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll  go far |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------|
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-16-00283-CV

Armando Carlos Duran

v.

Rebecca Garcia

On appeal from the

County Court at Law No. 2 of Hidalgo County, Texas

Trial Cause No. CL-15-2442-B

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal 

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION in accordance with its opinion. Costs of 

the appeal are adjudged against appellant.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

September 2, 2016.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>           5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THERMO
VOLTEK CORPORATION'S REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED OCTOBER 3, 1998
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>        1,000
       
<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             JAN-02-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                  OCT-03-1998
<CASH>                                                 14,903
<SECURITIES>                                              502
<RECEIVABLES>                                           9,391
<ALLOWANCES>                                              603
<INVENTORY>                                            12,335
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                       38,560
<PP&E>                                                 11,036
<DEPRECIATION>                                          7,718
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                         60,245
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                  10,541
<BONDS>                                                 5,250
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                                 0
<COMMON>                                                  497
<OTHER-SE>                                             33,957
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                           60,245
<SALES>                                                30,836
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       30,836
<CGS>                                                  17,357
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          17,357
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        2,092
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          143
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                        870
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                         1,007
<INCOME-TAX>                                              403
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                       604
<DISCONTINUED>                                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                             0
<CHANGES>                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                              604
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                            0.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0.07
        

</TABLE>
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsA method of calculating the total flow from a given sea surface topographyUsing a simple dynamical model of a wind-driven ocean circulation of the Stommel type, and an analytical basis developed to objectively analyze the sea surface height residuals from an altimeter and, in the process, to determine the total flow instead of just the near surface geostrophic component associated with the given sea surface topography. The method is based on first deriving the solution to the forced problem for a given wind stress required to develop a hypothetical true or perfect data field and to establishing the basis for the objective analysis. The stream function and the surface height field for the forced problem are developed in terms of certain characteristic functions with the same expansion coefficients for both fields. These characteristic functions are simply the solutions for a homogeneous elliptic equation for the stream function and the solutions of an inhomogeneous balance equation for the height field. For the objective analysis, using a sample of randomly selected height values from the true data field, the height field characteristic functions are used to fit the given topography in a least squares sense. The resulting expansion coefficients then permit the synthesis of the total flow field via the stream function characteristic modes and the solution is perfectly well behaved even along the equator. The method of solution is easily adaptable to realistic ocean basis by straight forward numerical methods. The analytical basis of the theory and the results for an ideal rectangular basin on a beta plane are described.Document ID19870009527Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsRao, Desiraju B.*(National Meteorological Center Washington, D.C., United States)*Steenrod, Stephen D.*(Applied Research Corp. Landover, Md., United States)*Sanchez, Braulio V.*(NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, MD, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateApril 1, 1987Subject CategoryOceanographyReport/Patent NumberREPT-87B0128NAS 1.15:87799NASA-TM-87799Accession Number87N18960Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19870009527.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
p.1 

OAR Box 1828 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

52) ll-K- (B) -40 

Docket Number: 

A-83-27 

Printed 11/12/2008 11:12:49 AM Sheet 52 of 325 
P.2 

/fiUg 

II-K-(B)-40 

EXPLANATION WHY TOTAL COST FOR BOILERS WITH HEAT INPUT 

RATES BETWEEN 100-200 MMBTU/HR FOR A STRINGENT S09 

EMISSION REGULATION IS LOWER THAN THE COST FOR A CESS 

STRINGENT REGULATION. 

Letter from E. Medine, EEA to R. Short, EPArSASD. 

July 3, 1980. 

THIS INFORMATION CAN BE FOUND IN DOCKET A-79-02, ITEM 

II-K-(B)-40