alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Before the Third Division,

November 21, 1945

No. 50685.

#### Protests 23762-K, etc., of Werner Marx et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of portions of cheese packed in boxes and that all such portions, except the portions described as Tilsit, are similar in all material respects to the cheese the subject of *Gruyere Cheese Corp.*v. *United States*(7 Cust. Ct. 171, C. D. 562) and *Kraft Phenix Cheese Corp.*v. *United States*(10 id. 271, C. D. 767). In accordance therewith the merchandise in question was held dutiable as claimed.
Richelieu

Lake George

James

Lake

Champlain

Saint Lawrence

Mississippi

Ohio

Wabash

Kentucky

Mohawk

Hudson

Connecticut

Delaware

Penobscot

Kennebec

Chauadiere

Susquehanna

Potomac

Cape Fear

Roanoke

Savannah

Yadkin Pee Dee

Santee

Broad

Dan

L A K E O N TA R I O

L A K E H U R O N

L A K E M I C

H I G A

N

L A K E S U P E R I O R

L A K E E R I E

Chesapeake Bay

ATLANTIC OCEAN

GULF OF MEXICO

Valcour Bay

B L U E

R I D G E

A P P A L A C H I A N

M O U N T A I N S

CHIPPEWA

SIOUX

CHIPPEWA

MISSISSAUGA

MENOMINEE OTTAWA

WINNEBAGO

SAC

FOX

OSAGE

IOWA

POTAWATOMI

KICKAPOO

ILLINI

MIAMI

ALGONKIN

WYANDOT

CAYUGA

ONEIDA

ONONDAGA

SENECA

ABENAKI

TUSCARORA

MOHAWK

MINGO

DELAWARE

CHEROKEE

CADDO

CREEK

CHOCTAW

CHICKASAW

QUAPAW

SEMINOLE

SHAWNEE

SHAWNEE

WEA

PIANKASHAW

WEA

I R

O Q U O I S

Fort Ticonderoga

Fort Stanwix

Fort Oswego

Fort Niagara

Fort Michilimackinac

Long Island

Blue Licks

Watauga/

Nolichucky

settlements

Boundary

uncertain

Wyoming

Valley 

Fort Crown Point

Fort Western

Fort Halifax Penobscot

Fort Detroit

Moores Creek Bridge

Fort Sullivan

Charleston

Cape Charles

Cape May

Cape Cod

Cape Henry

Cape Hatteras

Cape Lookout

Cape Fear

Cumberland Gap

Grand Portage

Wilkes-Barre

Worcester

Baltimore

Lancaster

Winchester

York Pittsburgh

Fort Henry

Morristown

Montréal

Tappan

Minisink

Ninety Six

Augusta

Norfolk

Boonesborough

Lexington

La Baye

Saint Joseph

Petersburg

Charlottesville

Fredericksburg

Alexandria

Camden

Charlotte

Salisbury

Salem

Hillsborough

Halifax

Edenton

Mobile

Saint Marks

Natchez Natchitoches

Saint Johns

Cahokia

Kaskaskia

Vincennes

Sainte Genevieve

Arkansas Post

Monmouth

Wilmington

Brunswick

Georgetown

Springfield Connecticut Farms

New

London

Norwalk

Fairfield

Saint Louis

Falmouth

Norridgewock

Albany

Newtown

Prairie du Chien

Cherry

Valley

Hampton

Hartford

Boston

Portsmouth

New Haven

New York City

Perth Amboy

Burlington

Philadelphia

New Castle

Annapolis

Williamsburg

New Bern

Savannah

Pensacola

New Orleans Saint Augustine

Québec

Providence

Newport

PENNSYLVANIA

MARYLAND

NEW JERSEY

DELAWARE

VIRGINIA

CONN

NOVA

SCOTIA

RHODE

ISLAND

NEW

HAMPSHIRE

NEW

YORK

NORTH CAROLINA

SOUTH CAROLINA

LOUISIANA

GEORGIA

EAST

FLORIDA

WEST FLORIDA

Province of

QUÉBEC

M A S S A C H U S

E

T

T

S

AREA

RESERVED

FOR

INDIANS

AREA

RESERVED

FOR

INDIANS

AREA

RESERVED

FOR INDIANS

AREA

RESERVED

FOR INDIANS

AREA

RESERVED

FOR INDIANS

0

0

100 200 Miles

100 200 Kilometers

North

Thirteen colonies

Other British

colonies

Spanish colonies

Thirteen colonies:

area where more than

30% of population is

of African-American

descent 

Thirteen colonies:

Proclamation of 1763

boundary 

Colonial capital

1775 colonial

boundary

Modern boundary

(included for

reference only)

Indian tribal 

name and area

Selected colonial

roads

Map Legend

British North America in 1775
### Testing procedures and results of studies of artificial recharge in the Grand Prairie region, Arkansas

By: Richard T. SniegockiF. H. BayleyKyle EnglerJ. W. Stephens

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1615G

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
# C_2016251EN.01003001.xml

| 11.7.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 251/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.7.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 251/30

---

Judgment of the General Court of 26 May 2016 — Bimbo v EUIPO (THE SNACK COMPANY)

(Case T-331/15) (1)

1

((European Union trade mark - Application for European Union figurative mark THE SNACK COMPANY - Absolute grounds for refusal - Descriptive character - Lack of distinctive character - Articles 7(1)(b) and (c) and Article 7(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Equal treatment - Obligation to state reasons - Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009))

(2016/C 251/34)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Bimbo, SA (Barcelona, Spain) (represented by: J. Carbonell Callicó, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. García Murillo and A. Schifko, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 31 March 2015 (Case R 954/2014 2) concerning an application for registration of the figurative sign THE SNACK COMPANY as an EU trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Bimbo, SA to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Bimbo, SA to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 262, 10.8.2015.

1

---
EXHIBIT 10.23.2

Service Addendum No. 2 to Service Agreement

Per Article 3 of the Service Agreement (the "Agreement") between The Dow Chemical Company ("TDCC") and Union Carbide Corporation ("UCC"), with an Effective
Date of 6 February 2001, this Service Addendum specifies services and licenses which TDCC (or its designated Affiliate or contractor) is to perform pursuant to the terms and conditions of the
Agreement.



|THE DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY |                                                                             | UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION
|------------------------ | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------
|By:                      |                                                                             |                          
|Name:                    | David E. Kepler II                                                          |                          
|Title:                   | Corporate Vice President, Electronic Business
and Chief Information Officer |                          

34

---

QuickLinks
122 STAT. 878 PUBLIC LAW 110–231—MAY 18, 2008 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 6051: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 154 (2008): 

May 14, considered and passed House and Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 110–231 

110th Congress 

An Act 

To amend Public Law 110–196 to provide for a temporary extension of programs 

authorized by the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002 beyond 

May 16, 2008. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. ADDITIONAL TEMPORARY EXTENSION OF AGRICULTURAL 

PROGRAMS AND SUSPENSION OF PERMANENT PRICE 

SUPPORT AUTHORITIES. 

Effective May 16, 2008, section 1 of Public Law 110–196 (122 

Stat. 653) (as amended by Public Law 110–200 (122 Stat. 695), 

Public Law 110–205 (122 Stat. 713), and Public Law 110–208 

(122 Stat. 720)) is amended— 

(1) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘May 16, 2008’’ and 

inserting ‘‘the earlier of May 23, 2008, or the date of the 

enactment of the Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008’’; 

and 

(2) in subsection (d), by striking ‘‘May 16, 2008’’ and 

inserting ‘‘the earlier of May 23, 2008, or the date of the 

enactment of the Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008’’. 

Approved May 18, 2008. 

Effective date. 

May 18, 2008 

[H.R. 6051] 


dkrause on GSDDPC29 with PUBLIC LAWS
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Commercial Mortgage  Servicing**D1050-084, 8th Fl  401 South Tryon Street  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|--------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

Reference is hereby made tothat certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of March 1, 2016, by andamong J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp., as Depositor,Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, Midland LoanServices, A Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as Special Servicer,Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Certificate Administrator,Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee, and Pentalpha SurveillanceLLC, as Operating Advisor and as Asset Representations Reviewer, with respectto Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2016-C1 (the"Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise definedshall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 11.09 ofthis Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of CommercialMortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1.            A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from March1, 2016 through December 31, 2016 (the “Reporting Period”), and ofits performance per the Agreement during such period has been made under mysupervision, and 

 

2.            To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer hasfulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respectsthroughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersignedhas executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2017.

 

/s/ Daniel Bober

Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President

Wells Fargo Bank

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll  go far |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------|
Before the First Division,

November 30, 1949

No. 53761.

petitions 6721-R and 6722-R (New York).

#### Golding Brothers Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

The record established that prior to each entry repeated conferences were had with the appraiser for the purpose of establishing the proper values of the merchandise. After filing appeals for reappraisement, the petitioner investigated market conditions in the country of exportation to determine the- proper values. Thereafter, the importer stipulated with the Government that certain items involved in the appeals were dutiable on the basis of foreign value, while others were dutiable on the basis of export value, as entered, and that the balance of the items were dutiable on the basis of the United States value, as appraised. On the record presented it was held that the petitioner acted without any intention to conceal or misrepresent the facts of the case or to defraud the revenue of the United States or to deceive the appraiser as to the value of the merchandise. *Union Food Products Co.*v. *United States*(13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 343, T. D. 41253) cited. The petitions were therefore granted.
No. 54281.

#### Judson-Sheldon Corp. *v.*United States,

protests 126280-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of frozen beef livers similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Judson-Sheldon Corp.*(37 C. C. P. A. 89, C. A. D. 424), the claim for free entry under paragraph 1669 was sustained.
MEDIA CONSULTING CONTRACT

This Media Consulting Contract ("Contract") is made this 15th day
of December, 1999 by and between Urbana.ca. Inc., a Nevada
corporation ("Client"), Suite 804, 750 West Pender Street,
Vancouver, BC V6C 2T8, and Loretta Paul, an individual doing
business as Gruntwerk Media Enterprises ("Consultant"), Suite
115, 800 Andrews Road, Richmond, BC V7E 6M2.

In consideration of the mutual promises of the parties hereto,
and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and
sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto
agree as follows:

1.  Conditions and Effective Date.

This Contract shall not take effect, and Consultant shall have no
obligation to provide services as described herein, until client
pays the retainer set forth below and returns a signed copy of
this Contract; however. the effective date shall be retroactive
to the date Consultant first provided services.

2.  Scope of Duties.

Client hires Consultant to provide media related consulting
services in connection with the operation of its business as it
pertains to the design, imaging and sale of "set-top boxes".
Consultant agrees to provide same general services for any other
peripheral products in which the Client may develop for sale.
Such services shall also include advertising liaison from time to
time.

3.  Term of Engagement and Termination.

The term of engagement shall be for one (1) year from the
effective date and may be terminated by either party without
cause upon 30 days written notice.

4.  Retainer and Expenses.

Consultant agrees to accept a retainer of 50,000 shares in the
capital of the Client and instructs that said shares be issued to
the Consultant.  Said shares shall also offset all expenses
incurred by the Consultant in performance of this Contract,
including travel.

5.  Assignment.

This Contract may not be assigned by either party without the
written consent of the other party.

6.  Entire Agreement.

This Contract represents the entire agreement between the
parties.  It is acknowledged by both parties that they may be
required to enter into certain agreements or file documents in
the course of registering the retainer shares for trading.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Contract to be
executed and delivered as of the date first written above.

                                        Urbana.ca, Inc.


                                        By :  /s/  Robert S. Tyson
                                        Robert S. Tyson, Secretary


                                        Loretta Paul, doing business as
                                        Gruntwerk Media Enterprises


                                        /s/  Loretta Paul
### Bibliography and index of the publications of the United States Geological Survey relating to ground water

By: Oscar Edward Meinzer

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp427

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
Case No. 9,245.

#### MASON v. MASON.

[3 Cranch, C. C. 648.] 1

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

Nov. Term, 1829.

Bills and Notes — Indorser—Suit against Prior Indorser.

The plaintiff indorsed a note (as town in-dorser,) already indorsed by two others, for the accommodation of the maker, and at maturity was obliged to take it up. *Held,*that he may recover of the first indorser the whole amount paid to take up the note.

[See Case No. 9,246.]

Assumpsit by the last indorser against the first indorser of a promissory note made by Thompson F. Mason, payable to and indorsed by the defendant, Richard B. Mason, and by H. Ashton. The note was offered for discount, but the bank required a town indorser, and the plaintiff, who resided in Alexandria, indorsed it. It was then discounted for the benefit of the maker, and, at maturity, paid by the plaintiff.

The defendant contended, that as he and Mr. Ashton indorsed it for the accommodation of the maker, he was only liable for one half; but

THE COURT (nem. con.), at the prayer of the plaintiff, instructed the jury that the defendant was liable for the whole amount paid by the plaintiff to take up the note.

THRUSTON and MORSELL, Circuit Judges,

were of opinion that this case differs from that of McDonald and Magruder at Washington, in this particular, that here the plaintiff was not originally one of the indorsers before the note was offered for discount.

CRANCH, Chief Judge,

did not think that that circumstance was material, because he was of opinion that the prior indorser -was liable to the subsequent, for the whole, unless there be an agreement to the contrary.
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Charles Lynch v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01

- 17

- 00668

- CR

Trial court case number: 15

- CR

- 3172

Trial court: 405th District Court of Galveston County

On October 23, 2018, the court issued an order, striking appellant’s Anders brief, granting appointed counsel’s motion to withdraw, and abating the appeal for appointment of new counsel. A supplemental clerk’s record was filed on October 29, 2018, containing an appointment of

counsel John Reed.

Accordingly, we lift the abatement and reinstate the appeal. Appellant’s brief is due 30 days from the date of this order

.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature:

__

/s/ Jennifer Caughey

________  A cting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: __ November 1, 2018

_____
Case No. 14,656.

#### UNITED STATES v. BROWN.

Circuit Court, E. D. Pennsylvania.

1848.

Slave Thade — Act of 1820 — Citizenship of Defendant.

1. Ownership of the vessel engaged in slave trade, by a citizen, if the accused be not himselt one. or citizenship of the accused, if the ownership be not in a citizen, is an essential ingredient of the offense, described by Act 1820, S 4 (3 Rtat. 600). Set U. S. v. Darnaud [Case No. 14.918J.

2. Citizenship, within the meaning of the act of 1820, is thar anequivocal relation between every American and his country which binds him to allegiance, and pledges to him protection.

3. Evidence that the funds which the accused was using belonged to one not a citizen; that he had no funds of his own: that he spoke of himself as an agent, and was recognized as such by the banker who supplied the funds, and by *1246the owner of those funds, — is.admissible to rebut a prima facie case of ownership in a citizen.

[Decided by GRIER. Circuit Justice. Nowhere more fully teported: opinion.not now accessible. Cited in 1 Briglitley, .Dig. 805), to the points above stated.]
Case: 2:12-cv-01209-EAS-NMK Doc #: 92 Filed: 08/21/14 Page: 1 of 5  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-01209-EAS-NMK Doc #: 92 Filed: 08/21/14 Page: 2 of 5  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-01209-EAS-NMK Doc #: 92 Filed: 08/21/14 Page: 3 of 5  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-01209-EAS-NMK Doc #: 92 Filed: 08/21/14 Page: 4 of 5  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-01209-EAS-NMK Doc #: 92 Filed: 08/21/14 Page: 5 of 5  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-11T21:17:20-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
### Preliminary results of radiometric reconnaissance of parts of the northwestern San Juan Mountains, Colorado

By: Wilbur S. BurbankCharles Thomas Pierson

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/cir236

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.