alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31

Certifications

I, Richard Simpson, certify that:

1.I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Trust 2016-GC37 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

2.Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4.Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and

5.All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:  Wells Fargo Bank, National Association; Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association; Park Bridge Lender Services LLC; Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas; CoreLogic Commercial Real Estate Services, Inc.; National Tax Search, LLC; Berkadia Commercial Mortgage LLC; KeyBank National Association; Pentalpha Surveillance LLC; C-III Asset Management LLC; and U.S. Bank National Association. 

Date:March 26, 2020

|  | /s/ Richard Simpson ___________________Richard SimpsonPresident, Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc.(senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor) |
|--|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

CGCMT 2016-GC37 Certifications

----

 

CGCMT 2016-GC37 Certifications
# C_2015065EN.01005501.xml

| 23.2.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 65/55 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.2.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 65/55

---

Action brought on 22 December 2014 — ZZ v Commission

(Case F-140/14)

(2015/C 065/74)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: S. Rodrigues and A. Tymen, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision of the Commission refusing to re-establish the career of the applicant by re-grading her, with effect from 1 March 2005, in a higher function group, and claim for compensation for the material and non-material harm allegedly suffered.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the Authority Empowered to Conclude Contracts of Employment (AECE) dated 17 September 2014, sent by a note of 18 September 2014 and received by the applicant on 19 September 2014; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Authority Empowered to Conclude Contracts of Employment (AECE) dated 17 September 2014, sent by a note of 18 September 2014 and received by the applicant on 19 September 2014;

| — | Order payment of compensation for the harm suffered by the applicant assessed ex aequo et bono in the amount of EUR 30  000; |
| --- | --- |

—

Order payment of compensation for the harm suffered by the applicant assessed ex aequo et bono in the amount of EUR 30  000;

ex aequo et bono

| — | Order the Commission to pay all the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Commission to pay all the costs.

---
# C_2019246EN.01002001.xml

| 22.7.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 246/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.7.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 246/20

---

Order of the General Court of 17 May 2019 — Deutsche Lufthansa v Commission

(Case T-764/15) (1)

(Action for annulment - State aid - Measures implemented by Germany in favour of Frankfurt Hahn airport - Decision declaring the aid compatible in part with the internal market - Decision finding that there is no State aid - Indirect aid - No individual concern - Inadmissibility)

(2019/C 246/20)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Deutsche Lufthansa (Cologne, Germany) (represented by: A. Martin-Ehlers, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Maxian Rusche, K. Herrmann and D. Recchia, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: Land Rheinland-Pfalz (Germany) (represented by: Professor C. Koenig)

Re:

Action under Article 263 TFEU for the annulment of Commission Decision (EU) 2016/788 of 1 October 2014 on the State aid SA.32833 (11/C) (ex 11/NN) implemented by Germany concerning the financing arrangements for Frankfurt Hahn airport put into place in 2009 to 2011 (OJ 2016, L 134, p. 1).

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed.

| 2. | Deutsche Lufthansa AG shall bear its own costs and pay those of the European Commission and of the Land Rheinland-Pfalz. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Deutsche Lufthansa AG shall bear its own costs and pay those of the European Commission and of the Land Rheinland-Pfalz.

---

(1)  OJ C 68, 22.2.2016.

---
# C_2017151EN.01003102.xml

| 15.5.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 151/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.5.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 151/31

---

Judgment of the General Court of 29 March 2017 — J & Joy v EUIPO — Joy-Sportswear (J&JOY)

(Case T-389/15) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - EU figurative mark J&JOY - Earlier national figurative mark joy SPORTSWEAR - Relative grounds for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Similarity of the goods - Similarity of the signs - Assessment criteria - Composite mark - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2017/C 151/39)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: J & Joy SA (Waremme, Belgium) (represented by: A. Maqua, C. Pirenne and C. Smits, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: H. O’Neill, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Joy-Sportswear GmbH (Ottensoos, Germany) (represented by: T. Kiphuth, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 22 April 2015 (Case R 1355/2014-2) relating to opposition proceedings between Joy-Sportswear and J & Joy.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders J & Joy SA to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders J & Joy SA to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 381, 16.11.2015.

1

---
A Vision for High Volume Win

Markets

AWEA Windpower 200

Robert Thresher

NREL/PR-500-40101Presented at Windpower 2006 Conference & Exhibition held June 4-7, 2006 in P
Disclaimer and Government License

This work has been authored by Midwest Research Institute (MRI) under Contract No. DE-AC36Department of Energy (the “DOE”). The United States Government (the “Government”) retains athe work for publication, acknowledges that the Government retains a non-exclusive, paid-up, irrepublish or reproduce the published form of this work, or allow others to do so, for Government puNeither MRI, the DOE, the Government, nor any other agency thereof, nor any of their employeeor implied, or assumes any liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulnesproduct, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe any privately owned ri

specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or othimply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the Government or any agency thereof. authors and/or presenters expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of MRI, the agency thereof. 
2006

Bulk Power 

Generator

5-8¢ at 13mph

With No PTC

• Land Based• Bulk Electricity• Wind Farms

Less than 1% of 

Electricity Market

Land-Based Electricity Path Transmi

Barrie

Cost & Regu

Barriers

• Hydrogen• Clean Water• Plug Hybrids

Cost & Infrast

Barrier

Land-Based LWST

Large-Scale

2–5 MW

Offshore Turbines

5 MW and Larger

Offshore Electricity Path

Advanced Applications Path

Today
• Lifetime O&M cost reduction through 

innovation giving high reliability 

• Condition monitoring to actively 

analyze the turbine condition and forecast maintenance

• Drivetrain innovation to reduce 

weight/cost while improving reliability

• Active rotor pitch and speed control 

for load reduction and more energy 

• Lighter rotors with higher tip speeds 

and more flexible blades giving higher energy and lower loads

• Twist/flap coupling for passive load 

control during turbulence conditions

• Scaling to larger sizes with transport 

and installation constraints?

Advanced Turbines Competitive w

NP

C
Deep Water Wind Turbine Dev

Current Technology
Plug Hybrid Electric Ve

(A Future Off-Peak Electricity Market 

“The Grid”

Off peak delivery

On peak drawdown

R

An
Offshore Wind / Wave S

Reproduced with permissi

Wind / Wave Integra

• Long-term Possibility +20 Years• Maximize Grid Interconnect Potential • Reduce Intermittency & Increase Total Ene• Increase System Reliability & Reduce Main

Credit: GE Energy
# C_2016364EN.01003302.xml

| 3.10.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 364/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.10.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 364/33

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (3rd Chamber) of 20 July 2016 —  U (*1) v Commission

(Case F-104/15) (1)

((Civil service - Survivor’s pension - Articles 18 and 20 of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations - Surviving spouse of a former official - Eligibility - Second marriage - Equal treatment of officials))

(2016/C 364/39)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: U (*1) (represented by: F.Moyse, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Gattinara, A.-C. Simon and F. Simonetti, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: European Parliament (represented by: M. Ecker and E. Tavena, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of the decision not to grant a survivor’s pension to the applicant.

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of 24 September 2014 by which the European Commission refused the application of  U (*1) for a survivor’s pension in respect of her late husband, a former official entitled to a retirement pension. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of 24 September 2014 by which the European Commission refused the application of  U (*1) for a survivor’s pension in respect of her late husband, a former official entitled to a retirement pension.

| 2. | Declares that the European Commission is to bear its own costs and orders it to pay the costs incurred by Mrs  U (*1). |
| --- | --- |

2.

Declares that the European Commission is to bear its own costs and orders it to pay the costs incurred by Mrs  U (*1).

| 3. | Declares that the European Parliament is to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Declares that the European Parliament is to bear its own costs.

---

(*1)  Information erased or replaced within the framework of protection of personal data and/or confidentiality.

(1)  OJ C 302, 14.9.2015, p. 71.

---
**Exhibit 31.3**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Christopher W. Shean, certify that:

 

1.             I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018 (this “**Report**”) of Liberty Expedia Holdings, Inc.; and

 

2.             Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Report.

 

Date: April 30, 2019

 
| /s/ CHRISTOPHER W. SHEAN              |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|
| Christopher W. Shean                  |   |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |   |

 

----
```

[110th Congress Public Law 195]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ195.110]

[[Page 122 STAT. 652]]

Public Law 110-195
110th Congress

                                 An Act

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service known as 
 the Southpark Station in Alexandria, Louisiana, as the John ``Marty'' 
  Thiels Southpark Station, in honor and memory of Thiels, a Louisiana 
     postal worker who was killed in the line of duty on October 4, 
               2007. <<NOTE: Mar. 12, 2008 -  [S. 2272]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. JOHN ``MARTY'' THIELS SOUTHPARK STATION.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
known as the Southpark Station in Alexandria, Louisiana, shall be known 
and designated as the ``John `Marty' Thiels Southpark Station''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``John 
`Marty' Thiels Southpark Station''.

    Approved March 12, 2008.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--S. 2272:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD:
                                                        Vol. 153 (2007):
                                    Nov. 16, considered and passed 
                                        Senate.
                                                        Vol. 154 (2008):
                                    Feb. 28, considered and passed 
                                        House.

                                  <all>
```
[J-80-2021]

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

RUTH L. KNEEBONE

v.

ZONING HEARING BOARD OF THE 

TOWNSHIP OF PLAINFIELD AND 

PATRICK LUTZ AND PAMELA LUTZ 

APPEAL OF: PATRICK LUTZ AND 

PAMELA LUTZ

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 52 MAP 2021

Appeal from the Order of the 

Commonwealth Court at No. 807 

C.D. 2019 dated July 9, 2020, 

Reconsideration Denied August 26, 

2020, Reversing the Order of the 

Northampton County Court of 

Common Pleas, Civil Division, at No. 

C-48-CV-2018-11586 dated June 7, 

2019.

ARGUED: December 7, 2021

ORDER

PER CURIAM DECIDED: April 28, 2022

AND NOW, this 28

th day of April, 2022, because the participating Justices are 

unable to reach consensus on the merits of the question as to which the Court granted 

allowance of appeal, the order of the Commonwealth Court is AFFIRMED by operation 

of law.

Former Justice Saylor did not participate in the consideration or decision of this 

matter.
**Exhibit
        32.2**
 
 
 
 Certification
        of CFO Pursuant to
 18
        U.S.C.
        Section 1350,
 As
        Adopted Pursuant to
 Section
        906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 
 
 In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of U.S. Energy Corp. (the "Company")
        on
        Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities
        and
        Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Robert Scott Lorimer,
        Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
        U.S.C.
        Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
        of
        2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:
 
 (1)           The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)           The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 
 
 
 
 /s/  Robert
                  Scott LorimerRobert
                  Scott Lorimer,Chief
                  Financial OfficerAugust
                  14, 2007
 
 
 This
        certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
        Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
        purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
        amended.
 
 A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
        to
        U.S. Energy Corp. and will be retained by U.S. Energy Corp. and furnished
        to the
        Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
---

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

EXHIBIT 32.2

The undersigned, REGINALD SCHAUDER, the Vice President-Finance,
Secretary and Treasurer of CANAL CAPITAL CORPORATION (the Company), DOES
HEREBY CERTIFY that:

|1. | The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
      quarter ended April 30, 2011 (the Report), fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
      and
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                     
|2. | Information contained in the report fairly presents, in
      all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of
      the Company.                                                         

IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the undersigned has executed this
statement this 30th day of October 2012.

/S/ Reginald Schauder
Reginald SchauderVice President-Finance, Secretary and
Treasurer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to Canal Capital Corporation and will be retained by Canal
Capital Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.

The foregoing certification is being furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not
being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the
Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general
incorporation language in such filing.

---
No. 53732.

protests 148645-K, etc. (New York).

#### Consolidated Sewing Machine *&*Supply Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Rao, J.

By virtue of the decision in *United States*v. *American Viscose Corporation*(30 C. C. P. A. 240, C. A. D. 239), the protests were dismissed.
# C_2016007EN.01002901.xml

| 11.1.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 7/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.1.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 7/29

---

Judgment of the General Court of 10 November 2015 — GSA and SGI v Parliament

(Case T-321/15) (1)

1

((Public service contracts - Tendering procedure - Supply of fire security, assistance to persons and external surveillance at the European Parliament’s site - Rejection of a tenderer’s bid - Obligation to produce prior authorisation issued pursuant to national legislation - Proportionality - Equal Treatment - Principle of openness - Freedom to provide services))

(2016/C 007/39)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Gruppo Servizi Associati SpA (GSA) (Rome, Italy) and Security Guardian’s Institute (SGI) (Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium) (represented by: E. van Nuffel d’Heynsbroeck, lawyer)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: P. López-Carceller and B. Simon, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of the Parliament’s decisions, contained in the letter of 12 June 2015, by which the Parliament informed the applicants, first, of the rejection of the tender submitted by them in respect of the open tendering procedure EP/DGSAFE/UIB/SER/2014-014 for the provision of fire security, assistance to persons (part 1) and external surveillance (part 2) at the European Parliament’s site in Brussels (O 2014/S 246-433095) and, secondly, that the relevant contract had been awarded to another company.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Gruppo Servizi Associati SpA (GSA) and Security Guardian’s Institute (SGI) to pay the costs, including those relating to the interlocutory proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Gruppo Servizi Associati SpA (GSA) and Security Guardian’s Institute (SGI) to pay the costs, including those relating to the interlocutory proceedings.

---

(1)  OJ C 262, 10.8.2015.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>       5
<MULTIPLIER>    1000

<PERIOD-TYPE>               6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>           JAN-03-1998
<PERIOD-END>                JUL-05-1997
<CASH>                            3,431
<SECURITIES>                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                   137,657
<ALLOWANCES>                      5,324
<INVENTORY>                     258,032
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                403,818
<PP&E>                          344,927
<DEPRECIATION>                  199,034
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  604,623
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>            58,307
<BONDS>                               0
<COMMON>                         30,015
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                 0
<PREFERRED>                       7,698
<OTHER-SE>                      159,456
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    604,623
<SALES>                         247,747
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                247,747
<CGS>                           189,052
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   199,236
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                 36,394
<LOSS-PROVISION>                  5,324
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>               12,342
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  (5,549)
<INCOME-TAX>                      2,164
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              (3,385)
<DISCONTINUED>                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                       0
<CHANGES>                             0
<NET-INCOME>                     (3,385)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                      (.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                      (.13)
        



</TABLE>
# C_2018381EN.01003101.xml

| 22.10.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 381/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.10.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 381/31

---

Order of the General Court of 13 July 2018 — BBY Solutions v EUIPO — Worldwide Sales Corporation España (BEST BUY GEEK SQUAD)

(Case T-715/15) (1)

(2018/C 381/36)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 59, 15.2.2016.

---