alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1998
<CASH>                                        (11,248)
<SECURITIES>                                 1,106,196
<RECEIVABLES>                                  195,908
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    500,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,950,674
<PP&E>                                       7,739,565
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,468,445
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              12,318,373
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,898,128
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     30,194
<COMMON>                                        53,138
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,397,931
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                12,318,373
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               803,670
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  637,465
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               278,615
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             214,232
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (374,015)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (374,015)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (374,015)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.09)
        

</TABLE>
AFS

- 13

- 540

- E November 4, 2013

Exemption No. 10886

Regulatory Docket No. FAA

- 20 13

- 0808

Mr. Timothy P. Kissel

Vice President of Education

MIAT College of Technology

2955 South Haggerty Road

Canton, MI 48188

Dear Mr. Kissel :

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our

decision, explains it s basis, and gives you the conditions and limitations of the exemption,

including the date it ends.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated September 10, 2013, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration

(FAA) on behalf of MIAT College of Technology (MIAT), for an exemption from § 65.75(a)

of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) . This exemption, if granted, wou ld allow

MIAT to administer the aviation mechanic general (AMG) written test to students

immediately following their successful compl etion of the general curriculum but before they

meet the experience requirements of § 65.77.

The FAA has determined that g ood cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any

delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to MIAT, and would not serve in the

public’s interest.

The FAA has issued grants of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to

those presented in your petition. In Grant of Exemption Nos. 6569 and 8629 (copies

enclosed), the FAA found that testing immediately after learning was a universally accepted

instructional principle that reinforces learning. Therefore, we allow the petitioner to test2

s tudents immediately after successfully completing the general curriculum but before meeting

the requirements of § 65.77.

Having review ed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that

—

• they are similar in all material respects to relief previously requested in the enclosed

Grant of Exemption Nos. 6569 and 8629;

• the reasons stated by the FAA for granting the enclosed Grant of Exemp tion Nos.

6569 and 8629 also apply to the situation you present; and

• a grant of exemption is in the public interest.

Our Decision

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 40113 and 44701, which the FAA

Administrator has delegated to me, I hereby grant MIAT College of Technology an exemption from 14 CFR § 65.75(a) to administer the aviation mechanic general written test to

students immediately following successful completion of the general c urriculum but before

meeting the experience requirements of § 65.77, subject to the condition and limitation

described below.

Condition and Limitation

Before exercising the privileges of this exemption, MIAT must provide its operation s handbook to its Certificate Holding District Office (CHDO) and receive approval of the

operations handbook from the CHDO.

This exemption terminates on October 30, 2015, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/

John S. Duncan

Director, Flig ht Standards Service

Enclosures
110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 308 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), 

3 SECTION 1. USE OF CAPITOL GROUNDS FOR NATIONAL 

4 PEACE OFFICERS’ MEMORIAL SERVICE. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Grand Lodge of the Fra6 ternal Order of Police and its auxiliary (in this resolution 

7 referred to as the ‘‘sponsor’’) shall be permitted to 
2 

•HCON 308 EH 

1 sponsor a public event, the 27th annual National Peace 

2 Officers’ Memorial Service (in this resolution referred to 

3 as the ‘‘event’’), on the Capitol Grounds, in order to honor 

4 the law enforcement officers who died in the line of duty 

5 during 2007. 

6 (b) DATE OF EVENT.—The event shall be held on 

7 May 15, 2008, or on such other date as the Speaker of 

8 the House of Representatives and the Committee on Rules 

9 and Administration of the Senate jointly designate. 

10 SEC. 2. TERMS AND CONDITIONS. 

11 (a) IN GENERAL.—Under conditions to be prescribed 

12 by the Architect of the Capitol and the Capitol Police 

13 Board, the event shall be— 

14 (1) free of admission charge and open to the 

15 public; and 

16 (2) arranged not to interfere with the needs of 

17 Congress. 

18 (b) EXPENSES AND LIABILITIES.—The sponsor shall 

19 assume full responsibility for all expenses and liabilities 

20 incident to all activities associated with the event. 

21 SEC. 3. EVENT PREPARATIONS. 

22 Subject to the approval of the Architect of the Cap23 itol, the sponsor is authorized to erect upon the Capitol 

24 Grounds such stage, sound amplification devices, and 
3 

•HCON 308 EH 

1 other related structures and equipment, as may be re2 quired for the event. 

3 SEC. 4. ENFORCEMENT OF RESTRICTIONS. 

4 The Capitol Police Board shall provide for enforce5 ment of the restrictions contained in section 5104(c) of 

6 title 40, United States Code, concerning sales, advertise7 ments, displays, and solicitations on the Capitol Grounds, 

8 as well as other restrictions applicable to the Capitol 

9 Grounds, in connection with the event. 

Passed the House of Representatives May 1, 2008. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 308 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the 

National Peace Officers’ Memorial Service.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5.4. 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-60980 Summary Calendar

KIRAN IQBAL Petitioner

v. MICHAEL B MUKASEY, U S ATTORNEY GENERAL Respondent

Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals BIA No. A97 545 982
Before KING, GARWOOD and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Kiran Iqbal petitions for reviewofthe decision ofthe Board o f Immigration Appeals (BIA) affirming the decision of the immigration judge (IJ) to deny her application for asylum, withholding ofremoval, and reliefunder the Convention Against Torture. The BIA adopted the IJ’s conclusion that Iqbal had failed to present evidence that she would be a target for persecution or torture if she returned to Pakistan. In her petition, Iqbal argues that her credible testimony United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D October 17, 2008 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 07-60980

2 and the State Department’s Country Report support her claims that she has a reasonable fear of future persecution. The BIA’s (and IJ’s) f inding that Iqbal’s fears were not objectively reasonable is supported by the record; the record clearly does not compel a contrary conclusion. Iqbal failed to make any showing that she suffered past persecution. See 8 C.F.R. § 208. 13(b). Additionally, Iqbal has not shown that she faces a reasonable fear of future persecution if she returns to Pakistan. See id. Iqbal at no time participated in any political party or function or expressed any political view. The asserted 1999 injuries to her father and 2004 injuries to her brother

– which are evidenced only by Iqbal’s testimony as to what her mother (or brother) told her before Iqbal left Pakistan, not by any personal observation or knowledge on Iqbal’s part – do not suffice of themselves to establish Iqbal’s asylum claims. SeeArifv. Mukasey, 509 F.3d 677, 681 n.15 (5th Cir. 2007); A bdel-Masieh v. INS , 73 F.3d 579, 584 (5th Cir. 1996). And Iqbal failed to reasonably explain why no corroborating evidence – such as letters or affidavits

– was procured from her mother or brother despite I qbal having remained in contact with them since she left Pakistan. Moreover, the fact that Iqbal’s mother remains in Pakistan and continuesworking for the political party without evidence of harm or threat diminishes the reasonableness of Iqbal’s fears of persecution. See Eduard v. Ashcroft, 379 F.3d 182, 193 (5th Cir. 2004). Because Iqbal has not satisfied the asylum standard, she cannot meet the
more stringent standard for withholding of removal. See id. at 186 n.2. Iqbal’s claim under the Convention Against Torture is alsowithout merit, as the record does not compel a finding that Iqbal will more likely than not be tortured if she is returned to Pakistan. See Bah v. Ashcroft, 341 F.3d 348, 352 (5th Cir. 2003); Efe v. Ashcroft, 293 F.3d 899, 907 (5th Cir. 2002). Iqbal’s petition for review is DENIED.
(Reap. Dec. 8990)

Entry Nos. 4989; 4384; 4521.

#### J. E. Bernard & Company, Inc. *v.*United States

(Decided September 11, 1957)

*Wallace & Schwartz*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Chief Judge:

These three appeals for reappraisement relate to certain diamonds exported from Belgium and entered at the port of Chicago, Ill.

The cases are before me on an agreed set of facts showing statutory foreign value to be the proper basis for appraisement of the merchan*646dise in question and establishing such value to be the “invoice unit value plus home consumption tax of two Belgian francs per 1,000 francs plus packing as invoiced,” and I so bold. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-7745

RICKY MILLER, Petitioner - Appellant, versus RONALD J. ANGELONE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District Judge. (CA-00-906-2) Submitted: April 18, 2002 Decided: April 25, 2002 Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ricky Miller, Appellant Pro Se. Linwood Theodore Wells, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Ricky Miller appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Miller v. Angelone , No. CA-00-906-2 (E.D. Va. July 9, 2001). We deny Miller’s motion for counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
No. 44234.

#### Protests 585997-G, etc., of Henry Pollak, Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Brown, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is bodies, hoods, forms, or shapes similar to those the subject of *Cohn*v. *United States*(4 Cust. Ct. 166, C. D. 314). The protests were therefore sustained.
### New Year flood of 1949 in New York and New England

By: Water Resources Division, U.S. Geological Survey

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/cir155

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
No. 49393.

#### Protests 96001-K, etc., of Wing On Co. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Walker, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 268 

Expressing the sense of Congress that a commemorative postage stamp should 

be issued to promote public awareness of, and additional research relating 

to, scleroderma. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 6, 2007 

Mr. LYNCH submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred 

to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of Congress that a commemorative 

postage stamp should be issued to promote public awareness of, and additional research relating to, scleroderma. 

Whereas an estimated 300,000 Americans have scleroderma, 

a chronic autoimmune disease that affects the skin, 

joints, and often times the internal organs, including the 

heart, kidneys, lungs, and gastrointestinal tract; 

Whereas scleroderma is difficult to diagnose due to the similarity of its symptoms to those of other autoimmune diseases; 

Whereas like other autoimmune diseases, scleroderma affects 

primarily women, ages 25 to 55, though men and children are also affected; 


cnoel on PRODPC60 with BILLS_CN
2 

•HCON 268 IH 

Whereas the cause of scleroderma is unknown and 

scleroderma has no known cure; 

Whereas Federal funding for scleroderma research has remained level at only approximately $11,000,000 for the 

past 4 fiscal years; and 

Whereas the Federal government, public and private organizations, health care providers, and the medical community are striving to work together more closely in order 

to improve the quality of life of people affected by 

scleroderma: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that— 

3 (1) the United States Postal Service should 

4 issue a commemorative postage stamp to promote 

5 public awareness of, and additional research relating 

6 to, scleroderma; and 

7 (2) the Citizens’ Stamp Advisory Committee of 

8 the United States Postal Service should recommend 

9 to the Postmaster General that such a stamp be 

10 issued. 

Æ 


cnoel on PRODPC60 with BILLS_CN
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# The National Guard heritage: the Guardians of the North, Alaska 1968

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  The National Guard heritage: the Guardians of the North, Alaska 1968 
                    -           Creator        
                    -  United States. National Guard BureauKünstler, Mort 
                    -           Publisher        
                    -  National Guard Bureau 
                    -           Description        
                    -  Painting by Mort Künstler 
                    -           Subjects        
                    -  United States. National Guard Bureau 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1980-19901960-1970 
                    -           Country        
                    -  United States 
                    -           State        
                    -  Alaska 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  151 × 61 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Ideal Contex Magnum G600 54 Plus at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at The University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  19214363.jpg 
                    -           OCLC Collection Number        
                    -  429489521 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1999
<CASH>                                          10,619
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   32,282
<ALLOWANCES>                                       437
<INVENTORY>                                     70,398
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               122,173
<PP&E>                                         282,005
<DEPRECIATION>                                  69,056
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 347,422
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           67,008
<BONDS>                                        201,052
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      48,486
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   347,422
<SALES>                                        245,084
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               245,084
<CGS>                                          216,995
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   19,936
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   112
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,794
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    107
<INCOME-TAX>                                        42
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 65
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        65
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Concord

Alewife

Charles

Mystic

CHARLES RIVER

Cambridge

Bridge South

Bridge

Cambridge Boston

Apr 19 1775-

Concord Mar 17 1776

Lexington

Lincoln

Charlestown

Watertown

Medford Winnisimmet

Roxbury

Brookline

North

Bridge

Apr 19 1775

Meriam’s

Corner

Brooks

Hill

Bloody

Angle

Fiske

Hill

Lexington Green

Apr 19 1775

Menotomy

Watson’s

Corner

Charlestown

Neck

HMS Somerset

Punkatasset Hill

Concord

Hill Pierce’s

Hill

Prospect Winter Hill

Hill

Dorchester

Heights Boston Neck

Bunker

(Breed’s) Hill

June 17 1775

Wright

Tavern

Old Manse

Meriam

House

Fiske

House

Hartwell

Tavern

Munroe Tavern Cooper

Tavern

Washington’s headquarters

(Vassall House)

July 1775-Apr 1776

Russell

House

0

0

2 Miles

2 Kilometers

North

1775
### Geology and ground-water resources of Sacramento Valley, California

By: Kirk Bryan

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp495

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 4**                            (pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

No abstract available.

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.