alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2016027EN.01000601.xml

| 25.1.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 27/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.1.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 27/6

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Prekršajni Sud u Bjelovaru (Croatia) lodged on 25 September 2015 — Siniša Pušić v Privredna banka Zagreb, Božo Prka

(Case C-512/15)

(2016/C 027/07)

Language of the case: Croatian

Referring court

Referring court

Prekršajni Sud u Bjelovaru

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Siniša Pušić

Applicant:

Defendants: Privredna banka Zagreb, Božo Prka

Defendants:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | May the retrospective application of the law [on consumer credit] be interpreted and determined exclusively in accordance with the provisions of that law, and is such an application of the law [on consumer credit] consistent with EU law, in particular Article 30 of Directive 2008/48/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of 23 April 2008, (1) the first paragraph of which expressly states that that directive does not apply to credit agreements concluded before the entry into force of national legislation that transposed the directive into national law? |
| --- | --- |

1.

May the retrospective application of the law [on consumer credit] be interpreted and determined exclusively in accordance with the provisions of that law, and is such an application of the law [on consumer credit] consistent with EU law, in particular Article 30 of Directive 2008/48/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of 23 April 2008, (1) the first paragraph of which expressly states that that directive does not apply to credit agreements concluded before the entry into force of national legislation that transposed the directive into national law?

1

| 2. | May the criminal provision of Article 26(1)(28) of the Croatian law on consumer credit, in the context described above, be interpreted consistently with Article 23 of the directive and in the light of the transitory provisions in Article 30 thereof, as meaning that the penalties laid down for breach of a national provision adopted on the basis of the directive in question may not be applied to breaches that may be found in respect of credit agreements ongoing at the date of the implementation of the national implementing measures? |
| --- | --- |

2.

May the criminal provision of Article 26(1)(28) of the Croatian law on consumer credit, in the context described above, be interpreted consistently with Article 23 of the directive and in the light of the transitory provisions in Article 30 thereof, as meaning that the penalties laid down for breach of a national provision adopted on the basis of the directive in question may not be applied to breaches that may be found in respect of credit agreements ongoing at the date of the implementation of the national implementing measures?

---

(1)  Directive 2008/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2008 on credit agreements for consumers and repealing Council Directive 87/102/EEC (OJ 2008 L 133, p. 66).

1

---
# C_2017006EN.01003502.xml

| 9.1.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 6/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.1.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 6/35

---

Judgment of the General Court of 17 November 2016 — Vince v EUIPO (ELECTRIC HIGHWAY)

(Case T-315/15) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Application for the EU word mark ELECTRIC HIGHWAY - Absolute grounds for refusal - Descriptive character - Lack of distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2017/C 006/43)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Dale Vince (Stroud, United Kingdom) (represented by: B. Longstaff, Barrister)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: S. Bonne, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 3 March 2015 (Case R 1442/2014-5), concerning an application for registration of the word sign ELECTRIC HIGHWAY as an EU trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Mr Dale Vince to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Dale Vince to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 406, 7.12.2015.

1

---
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 167 

Expressing the sense of Congress that Lena Horne should be recognized 

as one of the most popular performers of the 1940s and 1950s and 

for her outspoken opposition to racial and social injustice. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 11, 2007 

Mr. RANGEL submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred 

to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of Congress that Lena Horne should 

be recognized as one of the most popular performers 

of the 1940s and 1950s and for her outspoken opposition 

to racial and social injustice. 

Whereas Lena Horne was born on June 30, 1917, in Brooklyn, New York; 

Whereas Horne left school at the age of 14 and took her first 

stage job in order to help contribute to the family during 

the Depression; 

Whereas Horne began singing at Harlem’s famed Cotton 

Club at age 16 and began performing on Broadway soon 

after; 

Whereas Horne was 21 when she performed in her first feature role, ‘‘The Duke is Tops’’, after having taken a 


hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS
2 

•HCON 167 IH 

number of smaller roles that were often all that was 

available to blacks in Hollywood at the time; 

Whereas Horne was eventually signed with MGM studios, 

making her the first African-American to be signed to a 

long-term film contract, only to find that she was edited 

out of films that were distributed in the South; 

Whereas Horne performed in ‘‘Cabin in the Sky’’ in 1943, 

which is often regarded as the premier performance of 

her career; and 

Whereas Lena Horne continues to represent elegance, Hollywood glamour, wisdom, and the strength and determination of an entire generation of performers who struggled 

through racism and prejudice during the height of their 

careers: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that Lena 

3 Horne should be recognized for her achievements as a 

4 singer and Hollywood actress, for her contributions to the 

5 struggles for equality, and for using her celebrity as a cat6 alyst for change. 

Æ 


hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS
Make / Model A/C

Type

Aircraft 

Weight

Max 

Take- off 

Weight

Dimensions Max 

Flight 

time 

(approx.)

Max 

airspeed

Propulsion Power Payload Airframe 

material

DJI - Phantom 

3

Multirotor < 6 lbs. < 6 lbs. 30” x 30” 20 

minutes

40 mph 4x 

brushless 

motors

4s 

LIPO

EO Camera Plastic

DJI –

Phantom 2

Multirotor < 6 lbs. < 6 lbs. 30” x 30” 20 

minutes

30 mph 4x 

brushless 

motors

4s 

LIPO

EO Camera Plastic

DJI – Inspire 

1

Multirotor < 6 lbs. < 6 lbs. 25” x 25” 20 

minutes

30 mph 4x 

brushless 

motors

4s 

LIPO

EO Camera Plastic

Dragonfly X6 Multirotor < 4.5 

lbs.

< 4.5 

lbs.

33” x 35” 20 

minutes

40 mph 6x 

brushless 

motors

4s 

LIPO

EO, IR 

Camera

Carbon 

fiber, 

Plastic,

Precision 

Hawk 

Lancaster

Fixed 

Wing

5.3 lbs. 5.3 lbs. 4.9’ x 2’ 40 

minutes

40 mph brushless 

motor

3s 

LIPO

EO, IR, 

Multispectral, 

Lidar

Foam, 

Plastic, 

Carbon 

fiber, PCB

3DR Solo Multirotor 4.9 lbs. 4.9 lbs. 10” x 18” 20 

minutes

40 mph 4x 

brushless 

motors

4s 

LIPO

EO Camera Plastic

Procerus Fixed 

Wing

< 5 lbs. < 5 lbs. 32” x 32” 40

minutes

35 mph brushless 

motor

3s 

LIPO

EO Camera Foam

3DR x8 Multirotor 8 lbs. 8 lbs. 13.7” x 20.1” 15 

minutes

30

mph

8x 

brushless 

motors

4s or 

3s 

LIPO

EO, IR 

Camera

Aluminum

Silent Falcon Fixed 

Wing

33 lbs. 33 lbs. 14’ x 6.5’ 5 hours 50 mph Electric 

Motor

4s

LIPO

Visible, 

electro-optic, 

mid-wave 

infared

Plastic
# C_2016048EN.01009701.xml

| 8.2.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 48/97 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.2.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 48/97

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 15 December 2015 — Bonazzi v Commission

(Case F-88/15) (1)

1

((Civil service - Officials - Promotion exercise 2014 - General implementing provisions for Article 45 of the Staff Regulations - List of officials proposed for promotion by the Directorates-General and the services - Omission of the applicant’s name - Whether the list of officials proposed for promotion may be challenged before the Joint Promotion Committee - Failure to define a position by the Joint Promotion Committee - Consideration of comparative merits made by the appointing authority alone))

(2016/C 048/111)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Matteo Bonazzi (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: M. Velardo, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: C. Beradis-Kayser and G. Berscheid, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Annulment of the decision not to promote the applicant to the next grade (AD 12) in the European Commission’s promotion exercise 2014 and the claim for damages for the non-material damage allegedly suffered.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Declares that Mr Bonazzi shall bear his own costs and orders him to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Declares that Mr Bonazzi shall bear his own costs and orders him to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 279, 24. 8.2015, p. 61.

1

---
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 251 

Commending the National Renewable Energy Laboratory for its work of 

promoting energy efficiency for 30 years. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 8, 2007 

Mr. PERLMUTTER (for himself, Ms. DEGETTE, Mr. UDALL of Colorado, and 

Mr. SALAZAR) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on Science and Technology 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Commending the National Renewable Energy Laboratory for 

its work of promoting energy efficiency for 30 years. 

Whereas in 1977 the Solar Energy Research Institute opened 

and was designated a National Laboratory of the United 

States Department of Energy; 

Whereas in September 1991 President George H.W. Bush 

changed the institute’s name to the National Renewable 

Energy Laboratory (‘‘NREL’’); 

Whereas the NREL is the principal research laboratory for 

the United States Department of Energy’s Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy and also provides 

research expertise for the Office of Science and the Office 

of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability; 


ccoleman on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•HCON 251 IH 

Whereas the NREL is the Nation’s, and the world’s, preeminent laboratory for renewable energy and energy efficiency research and development; 

Whereas renewable energy and energy efficiency technologies 

are key to creating a clean energy future for not only the 

United States, but the world; 

Whereas the NREL’s focused research and development capabilities are positioned to advance national energy goals 

by developing innovations to change the way we power 

our homes and businesses, and fuel our cars; 

Whereas the NREL has worked vigorously through research 

and development to develop wind energy resulting in innovative designs, larger turbines, and increased efficiencies leading to dramatic reductions in energy costs; 

Whereas the NREL has also developed hydrogen energy scenarios that could be used to power the future and develop 

hydrogen infrastructure and delivery systems; and 

Whereas the NREL has developed biomass research technology, which provides biomass industries with rapid analytical tools for making the highest value applications of 

biomass or analyzing biomass: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That Congress— 

3 (1) commends the National Renewable Energy 

4 Laboratory for its work of promoting energy effi5 ciency for 30 years and seeking other avenues of en6 ergy independence because it enhances our national 

7 security, sustains our environment and creates jobs; 


ccoleman on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
3 

•HCON 251 IH 

1 (2) recognizes the achievements of the scientists 

2 and employees of the NREL and their exemplary 

3 service to the United States for 30 years; and 

4 (3) directs the Clerk of the House to transmit 

5 a copy of this resolution to the NREL for appro6 priate display. 

Æ 


ccoleman on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.2








CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906


OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Unico American Corporation (the "Company") for the period ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Lester A. Aaron, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





1.
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.










/s/  Lester A. Aaron


Name:          Lester A. Aaron


Title:           Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer


Date:           May 14, 2010











A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Unico American Corporation, and


will be retained by Unico American Corporation, and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 227 

Expressing the sense of Congress that secondary schools should consider 

starting school after 9:00 in the morning. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 4, 2007 

Ms. ZOE LOFGREN of California submitted the following concurrent resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on Education and Labor 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of Congress that secondary schools 

should consider starting school after 9:00 in the morning. 

Whereas scientific studies indicate that adolescents experience 

hormonal changes that keep them awake at night; 

Whereas most secondary schools begin classes at 7:30 or earlier in the morning; 

Whereas most teen crime occurs between 3:00 and 6:00 in 

the afternoon and a later start would result in a later 

school day; 

Whereas many adolescents who do not get enough sleep are 

more likely to be depressed, tardy, absent from school, involved in a car crash, and obese; and 

Whereas many adolescents do not get enough sleep to realize 

their full academic potential: Now, therefore, be it 


hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS
2 

•HCON 227 IH 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that sec3 ondary schools should begin classes after 9:00 in the 

4 morning. 

Æ 


hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS
#### Robert C. MELSON, Claimant-Appellant, v. R. James NICHOLSON, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Respondent-Appellee. *362John S. Gettler, Claimant-Appellant, v. R. James Nicholson, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Respondent-Appellee. Terry L. Southerland, Claimant-Appellant, v. R. James Nicholson, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Respondent-Appellee. John F. Walters, Claimant-Appellant, v. R. James Nicholson, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Respondent-Appellee. David J. Lucksted, Claimant-Appellant, v. R. James Nicholson, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Respondent-Appellee. James A. Burdette, Claimant-Appellant, v. R. James Nicholson, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Respondent-Appellee.

Nos. 04-7189, 05-7074, 05-7097, 05-7098, 05-7131, 05-7143.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Aug. 29, 2005.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the appellants’ unopposed motions to voluntarily dismiss their appeals,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The motions to voluntarily dismiss are granted.

(2) All parties shall bear their own costs.
OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE
  (1)  The undersigned has caused a review of the activities of the Company, in its capacity as Servicer, during the period April 27, 2016 through March 31, 2017 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance pursuant to the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of April 27, 2016 (the “Agreement”), by and among the Company, individually and as servicer, Nissan Auto Receivables Corporation II, as seller, and Nissan Auto Receivables 2016-B Owner Trust, to be conducted under his supervision; and
 (2)  To the best of the undersigned’s knowledge, based upon such review, the Company has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.
  rd
 /s/ Mark KaczynskiMark KaczynskiPresident and Chief Executive Officer
 22
Case: 2:12-cv-00171-EAS-MRA Doc #: 13 Filed: 01/15/13 Page: 1 of 10  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00171-EAS-MRA Doc #: 13 Filed: 01/15/13 Page: 2 of 10  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00171-EAS-MRA Doc #: 13 Filed: 01/15/13 Page: 3 of 10  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00171-EAS-MRA Doc #: 13 Filed: 01/15/13 Page: 4 of 10  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00171-EAS-MRA Doc #: 13 Filed: 01/15/13 Page: 5 of 10  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00171-EAS-MRA Doc #: 13 Filed: 01/15/13 Page: 6 of 10  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00171-EAS-MRA Doc #: 13 Filed: 01/15/13 Page: 7 of 10  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00171-EAS-MRA Doc #: 13 Filed: 01/15/13 Page: 8 of 10  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00171-EAS-MRA Doc #: 13 Filed: 01/15/13 Page: 9 of 10  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00171-EAS-MRA Doc #: 13 Filed: 01/15/13 Page: 10 of 10  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-12T14:31:42-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
(Reap. Dec. 9384)

#### Finwood Industries, Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 5083, etc.

(Decided April 7, 1959)

*Siegel, Mandell & Davidson*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Mollison, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement enumerated in the attached schedule of reappraisements relate to plywood, exported from Finland in the years 1956 and 1957, and were submitted for decision upon stipulation of counsel for the parties limited to the items of merchandise which were advanced in value and appraised on the basis of the home market value.

On the agreed facts, I find foreign value, as defined in section 402(c), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the said merchandise, and that such value, in each instance, was the appraised unit value, less 4 per centum, packed.

As to all items of merchandise where appraisement was made on the basis of the entered invoice unit values the appeals, having been abandoned, are dismissed.

Judgment will issue accordingly.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
EXTRACTED FROM UNITED AIR LINES, INC.'S STATEMENT OF
CONSOLIDATED OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31,
2000 AND CONDENSED STATEMENT OF CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
POSITION AS OF MARCH 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000,000

<S>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                  JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                    MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                         3-MOS
<CASH>                                                  363
<SECURITIES>                                            364
<RECEIVABLES>                                         1,742
<ALLOWANCES>                                              0
<INVENTORY>                                             327
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                      3,545
<PP&E>                                               21,059
<DEPRECIATION>                                        5,868
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       22,361
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                 6,583
<BONDS>                                               4,891
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                                  0
<OTHER-SE>                                            5,607
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         22,361
<SALES>                                                   0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      4,533
<CGS>                                                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         4,252
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      101
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                         204
<INCOME-TAX>                                             76
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      28
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                               209
<NET-INCOME>                                            (81)
<EPS-BASIC>                                             0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                             0


</TABLE>
(Reap. Dec. 8999)

Entry No. 49577, etc.

#### Carl Fischer Musical Inst. Co., Inc. *v.*United States

(Decided October 4, 1957)

*Siegel, Mandell & Davidson*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Chief Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement enumerated in schedule “A,” attached hereto and made a part hereof, relate to certain musical instruments exported from Paris, France, and entered at the port of New York.

Stipulated facts, upon which the cases have been submitted, establish that the proper basis for appraisement of the musical instruments, represented by the invoice items marked *“A,”*and checked “RDE,” is cost of production, as defined in section 402 (f) of the Tariff Act of 1930, and that such statutory value for the merchandise, as herein-above identified, is the invoice values, and I so hold.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.