alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
H. Con. Res. 258 Agreed to November 14, 2007 

One Hundred Tenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE FIRST SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday, 

the fourth day of January, two thousand and seven 

Concurrent Resolution 

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), That in the enrollment of the bill (H.R. 1429), An Act to 

reauthorize the Head Start Act, to improve program quality, to 

expand access, and for other purposes, the Clerk of the House 

of Representatives shall correct the bill by striking subsection (m)(1) 

of section 640 of the Head Start Act, as added by section 6(g) 

of the bill, and inserting the following: 

‘‘(1) to implement policies and procedures to ensure that 

homeless children are identified and prioritized for enrollment;’’. 

Attest: 

Clerk of the House of Representatives. 

Attest: 

Secretary of the Senate.
(Reap. Dec. 8992)

Entry No. 10443, etc.

#### Frances Murphy Hoyt, Shepston & Sciaroni et al. *v.*United States

(Decided September 16, 1957)

*Lawrence & Tuttle*for the plaintiffs.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Chief Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule “A,” hereto attached and made a part hereof, relate to various classes of merchandise exported from France and entered at the port of San Francisco, Calif.

*647The cases have been submitted for decision on a written stipulation wherein the parties agree that the issues involved herein are the same in all material respects as those which were the subject of the decision in *Bert Friedberg*& *Company*v. *United States,*36 Cust. Ct. 596, Reap. Dec. 8590, the record in which was incorporated herein by consent. In that case, the court held foreign value, as defined in section 402 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for appraisement of the merchandise there under consideration, and that such statutory value did not include the so-called “French sole or unique tax.”

An agreed set of facts, included in the stipulation of submission, establishes that the proper basis for appraisement of the merchandise in question is the unit value, as appraised, “plus cases and packing and excluding the so-called unique, producer’s or consumption tax, as added by the appraiser or by the plantiff to make dutiable value,” and I so hold.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
MATERIALS NOT INCLUDED IN

AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE (AD) DOCKET

FAA-2012-1135

Docket Number

2012-SW-097-AD

Directorate Identifier

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in DMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket - NPRM

Agusta Bollettino Tecnico No. 139-308, dated October 26, 2012.

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Office of the Regional Counsel,

Southwest Region

Rules Docket

2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663

Fort Worth, Texas 76137

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

except Federal holidays.
No. 44240.

#### Protest 871455-G of Eurasia Import Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Bbown, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is bodies,- hoods, forms, or shapes similar to those the subject- of *Cohn*v. *United States*(4 Cust. Ct. 166, C. D. 314). The protest was therefore sustained.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 34 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.Con.Res.34
                                              Agreed to February 5, 2007

                       One Hundred Tenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday,
            the fourth day of January, two thousand and seven

                          Concurrent Resolution

Whereas Percy Julian was born on April 11, 1899, in Montgomery, 
  Alabama, the son of a railway clerk and the first member of his 
  family to attend college, graduating from DePauw University in 1920, 
  receiving a M.S. degree from Harvard University in 1923 and a Ph.D. 
  from the University of Vienna in 1931;

Whereas in 1935 Dr. Julian became the first to discover a process to 
  synthesize physostigmine, the drug used in the treatment of glaucoma;

Whereas Dr. Julian later pioneered a commercial process to synthesize 
  cortisone from soy beans and yams, enabling the widespread use of 
  cortisone as an affordable treatment of arthritis;

Whereas Dr. Julian was the first African American chemist elected to 
  the National Academy of Sciences in 1973 for his lifetime of 
  scientific accomplishments, held over 130 patents at the time of his 
  death in 1975, and dedicated much of his life to the advancement of 
  African Americans in the sciences; and

Whereas Dr. Julian's life story has been documented in the PBS NOVA 
  film ``Forgotten Genius'': Now, therefore, be it

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),  
That the Congress honors the life of Percy Lavon Julian, a pioneer in 
the field of organic chemistry research and development and the first 
and only African American chemist to be inducted into the National 
Academy of Sciences.
Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.
```
Low Wind Speed Technology Phase II: Low Wind Speed Turbine Developments in 

Convoloid Gearing

Genesis Partners LP

Project Description: The involute curve has been used since 1754 to manufacture and improve the load carrying capacity of 

gearing. The proliferation of computers has exacerbated efforts to substantially increase the “power density” of gears, i.e., more 

power capacity in less space. Genesis Partners LP has developed and patented a new tooth form that analytically promises major 

improvements in the power density of gears, especially as applied to wind turbines, while lowering the cost of these devices. This 

subcontract will support design, shop-tests and field-tests on a limited number of gearboxes with involute and convoloid gears 

to compare their load carrying capacity. In addition, design scaling of the technology to a much larger wind turbine gearbox is 

anticipated.

Project Type: Component Development

Total Project Budget: $1,458,934

Industry Cost Share: $437,680

DOE Cost Share: $1,021,254

Planned Project Duration: June 2005–June 2007

Contacts:

NREL/Sandia: Genesis:

Alan Laxson, NREL Bernard Berlinger, Genesis Partners LP

1617 Cole Blvd. 405 Caredean Drive, Suite F

Golden, Colorado 80401 Horsham, Pennsylvania 19044

303-384-6944 215-674-8910

alan_laxson@nrel.gov BBerlinger@asidrives.com

Current Status: Project Underway

A Strong Portfolio for a Strong America • Energy efficiency and clean, renewable energy will mean a stronger economy, a cleaner environment, and greater energy 

independence for America. Working with a wide array of state, community, industry, and university partners, the U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Energy Efficiency 

and Renewable Energy invests in a diverse portfolio of energy technologies.

For more information contact EERE Information Center • 1-877-EERE-INF (1-877-337-3463) • www.eere.energy.gov

Produced for the U.S. Department of Energy by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, a DOE national laboratory

Printed with a renewable-source ink on paper containing at least 50% wastepaper, including 10% post consumer waste.

DOE/GO-102006-2209

March 2006
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 84 (Wednesday, May 2, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 24283]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-8335]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Organization of PJM States, Inc., District of Columbia Public 
Service Commission, Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission, Kentucky 
Public Service Commission, Maryland Public Service Commission, New 
Jersey Board of Public Utilities, North Carolina Utilities Commission, 
Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, and the Virginia State 
Corporation Commission, Petitioners; v. PJM Interconnection, L.L.C., 
Respondent: Notice of Designation of Commission Staff as Non-Decisional

April 25, 2007.
    Effective April 24, 2007, Alan Haymes, of the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission (Commission), was designated as non-decisional 
staff in the above-captioned docket. As non-decisional staff, Mr. 
Haymes will not participate in an advisory capacity in deliberations on 
the issues pending therein. Separated non-decisional and advisory 
staffs are prohibited from communicating with one another concerning 
the deliberations set forth above.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E7-8335 Filed 5-1-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
 

REGION VII
 

901 NORTH 5TH STREET 

KANSAS CITY, KANSAS 66101 

September 23, 2011 

Jeff Tu 

14912 Normandy Boulevard 

Bellevue, Nebraska 68123 

RE: SAID: 14341 

3059 South 42 Street 

Lead-Based Paint (LBP) Assessment 

Dear Owner/Resident: 

A Lead Based Paint assessment was recently performed on your property by the U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency as part of the Omaha Lead site investigation. The purpose of 

this assessment is to determine whether a significant quantity of LBP is present on the exterior 

surface of structures, where deteriorating paint conditions (peeling, flaking, cracking, etc) exist 

that might increase lead concentrations in the yard above acceptable levels. 

Enclosed are the LBP assessment sheets for 3059 South 42 Street. The EPA has developed paint 

stabilization eligibility criteria that involve measuring the amount of deteriorated LBP on a 

structure and calculating the concentration of lead in soils around the home that would result if 

all of the identified deteriorated paint were to fall to the ground and uniformly mix with the soil 

under certain assumptions. During the LBP assessment, the areal extent of the deteriorated paint 

observed on structure surfaces was estimated and the lead content in the deteriorated paint was 

measured using an X-Ray Fluorescence instrument. 

The data obtained during the LBP assessment was used to estimate the increase in soil lead 

concentration that would result if all of the deteriorating paint identified in the assessment were 

to fall to the ground and mix with surface soil within six feet of the foundation of the structure. 

For purposes of this calculation, the deteriorating LBP on a structure is assumed to fall onto the 

ground surface within six feet of the foundation and be uniformly mixed with the top one inch 

of soil. The estimated lead concentration in the soil potentially caused by the deteriorating LBP 

provides a measure of the severity of LBP deterioration on individual structures. The EPA uses 

these criteria to rank properties based on the potential for recontamination of soil to occur. Paint 

stabilization is being offered at only those households with the most severe LBP problems, 

particularly where children under the age of seven reside. 

The LBP assessment performed by the EPA using the above criteria indicated that your 

house IS NOT eligible for paint stabilization. 
 

 

 

If you have any questions or concerns, please contact the EPA Public Information Center at 

(402) 731-3045. 

Sincerely, 

Pauletta R. France-Isetts 

Project Coordinator 

Environmental Protection Agency 

Enclosures 

Para información en español, llame al EPA Information Center (402) 731-3045. 
7 

Omaha Lead Site LBP Assessment y/
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22

- 6699

WILLIAM FRANCE , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v.
CENTRAL PRISON , Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh

. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. ( 5:22

- ct

- 03136

- BO )

Submitted : February 21, 2023 Decided: February 23, 2023

Before NIEMEYER and DIAZ , Circuit Judges , and MOTZ, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

William France , Appellant Pro Se

.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 22-6699 Doc: 14 Filed: 02/23/2023 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM:
William France appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his
42 U.S.C. § 1983 action for failure to prosecute. On appeal, we confine our review to the
issues raised in the informal brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because France’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, he has forfeited appellate
review of the court’s order. See Jackson v. Lightsey , 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is
limited to issue s preserved in that brief.”). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decision al process.
AFFIRMED USCA4 Appeal: 22-6699 Doc: 14 Filed: 02/23/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site.(Historical purposes)
**Title:****Unified surface analysis manual**
 
2005 | 2006 | 2013
 
SuDoc:C 55.102:UN 3
Item Number:0275 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000615558
 
October 25, 2017
No. 39072.

#### Protest 947500-G of Hearst Magazines, Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

There was no appearance at the docket call of the case. On the record presented the protest was overruled.
No. 40367.

#### Protest 948719-G/87839 of Yamanaka & Co., Inc. (Chicago).

Opinion by

Sullivan, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of *Kwong*v. *United States*(T. D. 49409) the wooden stands in question were held dutiable separately at 335⁄8 percent under paragraph 412 as claimed.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 85 (Thursday, May 3, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24579-24580]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-8411]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP07-405-000]


Williston Basin Interstate Pipeline Company; Notice of Tariff 
Filing

April 26, 2007.
    Take notice that on April 23, 2007, Williston Basin Interstate 
Pipeline Company (Williston Basin) tendered for filing to become a part 
of its FERC Gas Tariff, Second Revised Volume No. 1, Fourteenth Revised 
Sheet No. 375, to become effective April 23, 2007:
    Williston Basin has revised the above-referenced tariff sheet found 
in Section 48 of the General Terms and Conditions of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, Second Revised Volume No. 1 (Tariff), to rename Point ID No. 
04840 (Kinder Morgan-Billy Creek) to Point ID No. 4840 (SourceGas-Billy 
Creek).
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed in accordance with the provisions of 
Section 154.210 of the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 154.210). 
Anyone filing an intervention or protest must serve a copy of that 
document on the Applicant. Anyone filing an intervention or protest on 
or before the intervention or protest date need not serve motions to 
intervene or

[[Page 24580]]

protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#763033243539181a1f181325030606190402361013041558111900"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="8fc9caddccc0e1e3e6e1eadcfaffffe0fdfbcfe9eafdeca1e8e0f9">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-8411 Filed 5-2-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# C_2016402EN.01004001.xml

| 31.10.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 402/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.10.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 402/40

---

Judgment of the General Court of 20 September 2016 –PAN Europe v Commission

(Case T-51/15) (1)

1

((Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 - Documents relating to endocrine-disrupting chemicals - Partial refusal of access - Exception relating to the decision-making process - Article 4(3) of Regulation No 1049/2001))

(2016/C 402/45)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Pesticide Action Network Europe (PAN Europe) (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: B. Kloostra, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Buchet, P. Mihaylova and J. Tomkin, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Intervener in support of the applicant: Kingdom of Sweden (represented by: A. Falk, C. Meyer-Seitz, U. Persson, N. Otte Widgren, E. Karlsson and L. Swedenborg, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the applicant:

Re:

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of the Commission’s Decision of 24 November 2014, under the reference Ares (2014) 3900631, in so far as it refuses access to documents relating to endocrine-disrupting chemicals.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the European Commission of 24 November 2014, under the reference Ares (2014) 3900631, in so far as it refuses access to the documents designated under numbers 9, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 17a, 20, 22, 24, 25, 29, 30, 31, 37, 38, 39, 41, 42 and 43, on the basis of the first subparagraph of Article 4(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the European Commission of 24 November 2014, under the reference Ares (2014) 3900631, in so far as it refuses access to the documents designated under numbers 9, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 17a, 20, 22, 24, 25, 29, 30, 31, 37, 38, 39, 41, 42 and 43, on the basis of the first subparagraph of Article 4(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents;

| 2. | Dismisses the action as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

| 3. | Orders the Commission, in addition to bearing its own costs, to pay those incurred by Pesticide Action Network Europe (PAN Europe); |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Commission, in addition to bearing its own costs, to pay those incurred by Pesticide Action Network Europe (PAN Europe);

| 4. | Declares that the Kingdom of Sweden is to pay its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Declares that the Kingdom of Sweden is to pay its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 118, 13.4.2015.

1

---
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT
UNITED STATES OF AM ER IC A,

Pla i ntiff-Appe lle e , v. PHUONG H. NGUYEN, AKA LJ,

De fe nda n t-Appe l la

nt. No. 16-30128

D.C . No. 2:15-c r-00120-JC C -15
M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Sta t e s Distric t C ourt for the W e ste rn Distric t of W a shington John C . C o u ghe nour, Distric t Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d De c e m

be r 8, 2017 ** Se a ttle , W a s hington B e fore : HAW KINS, M c KEOW N, a nd C HR ISTEN, C i rc uit Judge s. Phuong Nguy e n a

ppe a ls his guilty -ple a c onvic tion and 144-m o nth se nte nc e im pose d for c onspira c y to distribute c ontro l l ed substa nc e s in viola

tion of 21 U.S.C
. §§ 841(a )(1), 841 (b)(1)(C ) and fe lon in posse s si o n of a fire arm in viola tion of 1 8 

# FIL ED
DEC 14 2017 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U

. S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not ap p r o pr iate for public a tion a nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by Ninth C irc uit R

ule 36-3.

* * T h e p an el u n an i m ously c onc l ud es t h i s cas e i s s ui tab l e f o r d eci s i o n without ora l a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a )(2).U.S.C
. § 922(g)(1). Pursua nt t o Ande rs v . C

alifornia , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), c ounse l for N guy e n ha s file d a brie f sta ting the re are n o grounds for re lie f, and a m otion to withdra w a s c ounse l of re c ord. No pro se or gove rnm e nt brie f ha s be e n file d. Our inde pe nde nt re v ie w of the re c ord pursua nt to Pe nson v . Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 83-84 (1988), d isc lose s no grounds for re lie f on dire c t a ppe a l. A c c ordingly , w e a ffirm the d istric t c o urt’ s judgm e nt. C ounse l’ s m otion to withdra w is G RANT E D. AFFIRM E D.

2
Exhibit 12.2



CERTIFICATIONS



I, Mark Hahn, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to annual report on
Form 20-F/A of Verona Pharma plc; and



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.



|Date: July 16, 2020 | By: | /s/ Mark Hahn                                                  
|------------------- | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------
|                    |     | Mark Hahn
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)