alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

EXHIBIT 32.1

The undersigned, MICHAEL E. SCHULTZ, the Chief Executive
Officer of CANAL CAPITAL CORPORATION (the Company), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY
that:

|1. | The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
      quarter ended April 30, 2011 (the Report), fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
      and
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                     
|2. | Information contained in the report fairly presents, in
      all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of
      the Company.                                                         

IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the undersigned has executed this
statement this 30th day of October 2012.

/S/ Michael E. Schultz
Michael E. SchultzChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive
Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to Canal Capital Corporation and will be retained by Canal
Capital Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.

The foregoing certification is being furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not
being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the
Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general
incorporation language in such filing.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FORM
10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          10,902
<SECURITIES>                                    41,346
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,507
<ALLOWANCES>                                       737
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                66,983
<PP&E>                                          24,260
<DEPRECIATION>                                  15,996
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 128,980
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           22,759
<BONDS>                                         20,331
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,371
<OTHER-SE>                                      69,900
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   128,980
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                31,429
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   20,659
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,129<F1>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    72
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 366
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,469
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,526
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,943
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,943
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .33
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .33
<FN>
<F1>Represents the total depreciation and amortization expense, but does not
    include S,G&A expenses of $6,412.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
|WELLS
    FARGO(logo) | Commercial
    Mortgage ServicingD1050-084, 8th Fl
401 South Tryon Street
Charlotte, NC 28202
1-800-326-1334
|--------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE



Reference is hereby made to that
certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of November 1, 2016, by and among CCRE COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES, L.P., as
Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, RIALTO CAPITAL ADVISORS, LLC, as Special Servicer, AEGON
USA REALTY ADVISORS, LLC, as Potomac Mills Special Servicer, WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, WELLS FARGO BANK,
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator, Paying Agent and Custodian, PARK BRIDGE LENDER SERVICES LLC, as Operating Advisor
and Asset Representations Reviewer with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, CFCRE 2016-C6 (the “Agreement”).
Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.



Pursuant to Section 10.11 of this Agreement, I, Daniel
Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities of the Master Servicer
during the period from January 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance per
the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review,
the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting
Period.                                                       



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this
Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2018.





|/s/ Daniel Bober         | 
|------------------------ | 
|Daniel Bober             | 
|Executive Vice President | 
|Wells Fargo Bank         | 



Together we’ll
go far

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.













SERVICING FUNCTION PARTICIPANTS

CFCRE 2016-C6



CoreLogic Commercial Real Estate Services, Inc.

National Tax Search, LLC

Berkeley Point (Limited)

Berkeley Point Capital LLC
(Reap. Dec. 9414)

#### Reliance Pet Supply, Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 836175, etc.

(Decided May 5, 1959)

Plaintiff not represented by counsel.

*George OoeJiran Dowd,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Lawrence, Judge:

When the appeals for a reappraisement enumerated in schedule “A,” attached to and made part of this decision, were called for hearing, there was no appearance on behalf of plaintiff.

*627An examination of the official record, discloses no reason for disturbing the presumptively correct value for the merchandise found by the appraiser.

I, therefore, find and hold the proper dutiable value of the merchandise covered by these appeals to be the value found by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Commercial Mortgage  Servicing**D1050-084, 8th Fl  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|--------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

  

Reference is hereby made to thatcertain Trust and Servicing Agreement dated as of March 18, 2016, by and amongGS MORTGAGE SECURITIES CORPORATION II, as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONALASSOCIATION, as Servicer, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as SpecialServicer, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administratorand WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, with respect toCommercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2016-RENT (the"Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise definedshall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 11.7 ofthis Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of CommercialMortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1.            A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period from March 18,2016 through December 31, 2016 (the “Reporting Period”), and of itsperformance per the Agreement during such period has been made under mysupervision, and 

 

2.            To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilledall of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughoutthe Reporting Period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, theundersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2017.

 

 

 /s/ Daniel Bober

Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll go far |
|------------------------|------------------------------------|
No. 39073.

#### Protests 944366-G, etc., of Nathan Schweitzer Co. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

On the records presented the protests were overruled.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Antonio GONZALEZ-RADIYA, Defendant—Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Antonio Gonzalez-Radiya, aka Jaime Rosales-Morales aka Antonio Trujillo-Avalos, Defendant—Appellant.

Nos. 04-10429, 04-10436.

D.C. No. CR-04-00254-FRZ/NFF, CR-00-00254-1-FRZ.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 12, 2005.*

Decided Sept. 19, 2005.

Celeste Corlett, Tucson, AZ, for Plaintiffs-Appellees.

Lee Tucker, Tucson, AZ, for Defendants-Appellants.

Before REINHARDT, RYMER and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM**

Antonio Gonzalez-Radiya appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea to unlawfully entering the United States *880after having been previously deported in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326.

Gonzalez-Radiya contends that the district court erred in applying the Sentencing Guidelines as mandatory when imposing his sentence. Because GonzalezRadiya was sentenced under the then-mandatory Sentencing Guidelines, and we cannot reliably determine from the record whether the sentence imposed would have been materially different had the district court known that the Guidelines were advisory, we remand to the district court to answer that question, and to proceed pursuant to *United States v. Ameline,*409 F.3d 1073, 1084 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc). *See United States v. Moreno-Hernandez,*419 F.3d 906, 915-16 (9th Cir.2005) (extending Ameline’s limited remand procedure to cases involving non-constitutional *Booker*error).

REMANDED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
| (logo) WELLS

           FARGO | **Commercial  Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084,  8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334

 

  |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

# **ANNUALSTATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE**

 

 

Reference is hereby made to that certain Trust and ServicingAgreement dated as of March 18, 2016, by and among GS MORTGAGE SECURITIESCORPORATION II, as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, asServicer, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Special Servicer, WELLSFARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator and WILMINGTONTRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, with respect to Commercial MortgagePass-Through Certificates Series 2016-RENT (the "Agreement").Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meaningsassigned in the Agreement. 

 

Pursuant to Section 11.7 of this Agreement, I, Leslie Hayton,Managing Director of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that: 

 

1.            A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period from January 1, 2018through December 31, 2018 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance perthe Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and 

 

2.           To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilledall of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughoutthe Reporting Period. 

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificateas of the 28th day of February 2019. 

 

 

/s/ LeslieHayton

Leslie Hayton 

Managing Director

Wells Fargo Bank 

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank,  N.A. | (logo) Together  we’ll go far |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
III 

Calendar No. 406 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 193 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 25, 2007 

Received and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

OCTOBER 4, 2007 

Reported by Mr. LEAHY, without amendment 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Recognizing all hunters across the United States for their 

continued commitment to safety. 

Whereas in 2006 there were over 16,000,000 hunters in the 

United States of which only .0013 percent incurred an 

injury during the past hunting season; 

Whereas in 2006 this injury rate was lower than many other 

forms of recreation; 

Whereas there are 70,000 hunter education instructors teaching hunter safety, ethics, and conservation to approximately 750,000 students successfully each year; 

Whereas State fish and game agencies began offering hunter 

safety programs in 1949, and since then, more than 

35,000,000 people have been certified; 


hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS
2 

HCON 193 RS 

Whereas much of the success of hunter safety can be contributed to hunter education training and the role of responsible hunters in the field; 

Whereas Congress commends Pennsylvania hunters for setting a new State safety record in 2006; 

Whereas hunters continue year after year to improve their 

safety record; and 

Whereas hunters are the vital link in preserving and maintaining the great natural resources in the United States, 

including wild places: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That the Congress— 

3 (1) recognizes all hunters across the United 

4 States for their continued commitment to safety; 

5 and 

6 (2) directs the Secretary of the Senate to trans7 mit a copy of this resolution to the Pennsylvania 

8 State Game Commissioner and the Director of the 

9 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 24, 

2007. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 


hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS

hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS
Calendar No. 406 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 193 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Recognizing all hunters across the United States 

for their continued commitment to safety. 

OCTOBER 4, 2007 

Reported without amendment 


hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS
Case No. 6,498.

#### GODFREY v. GILMARTIN.

[2 Blatchf. 340.] 1

Circuit Court, S. D. New York.

Oct. 15, 1851.

Admiralty- Appeals — Jurisdictional Amount— Interest — Affirmance—Costs.

1. Where an action in personam is brought in the district court, in admiralty, on a money demand amounting to less than $50, but the-Iibellant’s claim, with interest, amounts to more than $50 at the time the decree is made by the district court, and he has a decree in that court for more than $50, an appeal lies to this court from such decree.

2. On such appeal, the action becomes a plenary suit in this , court, and, if the decree is affirmed by this court with costs, full costs of this court may be taxed.

This was an appeal [by Jonathan Godfreyl from the clerk’s taxation of costs. The suit was an action in personam, brought in admiralty, in the district court, on a money demand amounting to less than $50. The libellant’s claim, with interest, amounted to more than $50 at the time the decree was made by the district court, and he had a decree in that court for more than $50. After this court had, on appeal, affirmed the decree with costs, the clerk taxed full costs of this court against the respondent [Daniel Gilmar-tin], from which taxation he appealed.

THE COURT

held that the case was one in which an appeal was allowed by law, and that, on the appeal, the action became a plenary suit in this court and carried full costs of this court
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of United Refining Company, (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending February 28, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
James E. Murphy, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, to my
knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





                                         / s /  James E. Murphy
                                         --------------------------
                                         James E. Murphy
                                         Principal Financial Officer
                                         April 14, 2003











A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to United Refining Company and will be retained by United Refining
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
No. 39077.

#### Protest 376626-G of Dave Herstein Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

The record showed that certain of the articles are in chief value of cellulose filaments similar to those involved in Abstract 37230. The claim at 60 percent under paragraph 31 was therefore sustained.
Case No. 9,957.

#### MURRAY v. BECK.

[2 Cranch, C. C. 677.] 1

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

May Term, 1826.

Replevin — Retoun'o Bond — Return op . Property.

If goods be taken in execution and replevied by a third person, the court, upon the return of *1047the writ of replevin, will order a return of the property upon the usual retorno-habendo bond.

Replevin.

Mr. Morfit, for defendant [Joseph W. Beck],

upon the return of the writ, moved for a return of the property. The defendant was a constable, and had levied an execution on a hackney coach and horses, in possession, and as the property, of Michael Murray. His brother Thomas (the plaintiff,) sued out this writ of replevin, claiming title to the property under a bill of sale from Michael, which was, in fact, executed three days after the fi. fa. came to the hands of the defendant, but was antedated fifteen days, with the confessed intention to avoid this execution and to secure a debt due from Michael to Thomas.

THE COURT

ordered a return of the property upon the usual retorno-habendo bond.

MORSELL, Circuit Judge, contra, being of opinion that the Maryland' act of 17S5, c. 80, § 14, did not apply, nor authorize a return in such a case, where an officer, acting under;an execution, is defendant in replevin. • Ideo quaere.
<PAGE>

Exhibit 99.4

                Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C., Section 1350
      as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
                   -------------------------------------------


      In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed pursuant to
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, of
Unifab International, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended June 30, 2002,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Peter J. Roman, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      1)    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
            and

      2)    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


                                   /s/  Peter J. Roman
                                   ---------------------------------
                                   Name:  Peter J. Roman
                                   Title: Chief Executive Officer and Chief
                                          Financial Officer
                                   Date:  August 14, 2002
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United
States Code), each of the undersigned officers of United Refining Company, a Pennsylvania corporation (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:



The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended May 31, 2006
(the Form 10-Q) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                    |  |  |  |     |  |                          |  |                                                 
|------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ------------------------ |  | ------------------------------------------------
|                    |  |  | 
|Dated: July 7, 2006 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ John A. Catsimatidis
|                    |  |  |  |     |  |                          |  | John A. Catsimatidis Principal Executive
Officer
|                    |  |  | 
|Dated: July 7, 2006 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ James E. Murphy     
|                    |  |  |  |     |  |                          |  | James E. Murphy Principal Financial
Officer     



The foregoing
certification is being furnished solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of this Form 10-Q
or as a separate disclosure document.



A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to United Refining Company and will be retained by United Refining Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.