alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.26
                                 SALE OF RIGHTS

EFFECTIVE AS OF MAY 1, 1999

BETWEEN: CYBEROAD GAMING CORPORATION, a St. Kitts, West Indies corporation,
("CGC"); and

BETWEEN: CYBEROAD.COM (ISLE OF MAN) LIMITED, an Isle of Man corporation,
("Cyberoad IOM");

WHEREAS this agreement hereby acknowledges that:

        a)      CGC hereby agrees to sell and transfer 100% of it's capital
                assets as set out in Schedule "A" attached, to Cyberoad IOM in
                consideration for a total amount of U.S. $10.00, hereby
                acknowledged as being accepted in full.

EXECUTION IN COUNTERPART

This agreement may be signed in counterpart, in as many counterparts as may be
necessary, each of which shall deemed to be an original, and shall constitute
one and the same agreement, and shall bear the date first written above.

AGREED TO AND ACKNOWLEDGED ON THE 1ST DAY OF MAY, 1999 BY:


CYBEROAD GAMING CORPORATION                CYBEROAD.COM (ISLE OF MAN) LIMITED

/s/  LAWRENCE COFIELD                      /s/   JOHN COFFEY
----------------------------               ----------------------------------
Lawrence Cofield,                          John Coffey,
Director                                   Director


<PAGE>   2

SCHEDULE "A"

ASSETS

Assets Cyberoad Gaming Corporation included under this Sale of Assets consist of
the following as at April 30, 1999:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S>                                               <C>
         Computer Equipment (NBV)                 104,690.86
         Computer Software (NBV)                    7,238.76
         Leased Equipment (NBV)                    18,092.18
         Furniture and Fixtures (NBV)               4,148.41
         Office Equipment (NBV)                     9,458.04

         Asset Total                              143,628.25
</TABLE>


<PAGE>   3

                                 SALE OF RIGHTS

EFFECTIVE AS OF MAY 1, 1999

BETWEEN: CYBEROAD GAMING CORPORATION, a St. Kitts, corporation ("CGC"); and

BETWEEN: CYBEROAD.COM (ISLE OF MAN) LIMITED, an Isle of Man corporation,
("Cyberoad IOM"),

WHEREAS this agreement hereby acknowledges that:

        a)      CGC hereby agrees to sell and transfer 100% of it's capital
                assets as set out in Schedule "A" attached, to Cyberoad IOM in
                consideration for a total amount of U.S. $10.00, hereby
                acknowledged as being received in full,

EXECUTION IN COUNTERPART

This instrument may be signed in counterpart, in as many counterparts as may be
necessary, each of which shall deemed to be an original, and each of which shall
constitute one and the same instrument, and shall bear the date first written
above.

ACKNOWLEDGED AND AGREED TO ON THE 18TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 1999 BY:

CYBEROAD GAMING CORPORATION                CYBEROAD.COM (ISLE OF MAN) LIMITED

/s/  LAWRENCE COFIELD                      /s/   JOHN COFFEY
----------------------------               ----------------------------------
Lawrence Cofield,                          John Coffey,
Director                                   Director
No. 54883.

#### American Ladder Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 72250-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Rao, J.

The protests were dismissed.
# C_2016222EN.01002201.xml

| 20.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 222/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 222/22

---

Order of the General Court of 25 April 2016 — Filip Mikulik v Council

(Case T-520/15 P) (1)

((Appeal - Civil service - Officials - Recruitment - Dismissal at the end of the probationary period - Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded))

(2016/C 222/27)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellant: Filip Mikulik (Prague, Czech Republic) (represented by: M. Velardo, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bauer and M. Veiga, acting as Agents)

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (sitting as a single judge) of 25 June 2015 in Mikulik v Council (F 67/14, EU:F:2015:65), and seeking the annulment of that judgment.

Operative part of the order

The Court:

| 1. | dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | orders Mr Filip Mikulik to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

orders Mr Filip Mikulik to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 354, 26.10.2015.

---
EXHIBIT 99.1
                                                                    ------------


                         CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906
                                     OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Unico American
Corporation (the "Company") for the period ended March 31, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission as of the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Erwin Cheldin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
    the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



                    /s/  Erwin Cheldin
                    ------------------
           Name:    Erwin Cheldin
           Title:   Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer
           Date:    May 14, 2003




This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 85 (Thursday, May 3, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24674-24675]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-8491]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

[Summary Notice No. PE-2007-15]


Petitions for Exemption; Summary of Petitions Received

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of petition for exemption received.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice contains a summary of certain petition seeking 
relief from specified requirements of 14 CFR. The purpose of this 
notice is to improve the public's awareness of, and participation in, 
this aspect of FAA's regulatory activities. Neither publication of this 
notice nor the inclusion or omission of information in the summary is 
intended to affect the legal status of any petition or its final 
disposition.

DATES: Comments on petitions received must identify the petition docket 
number involved and must be received on or before May 23, 2007.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments [identified by DOT DMS Docket Number 
FAA-2007-27822] by any of the following methods:
    <bullet> Web site: http://dms.dot.gov. Follow the instructions for 
submitting comments on the DOT electronic docket site.
    <bullet> Fax: 1-202-493-2251.
    <bullet> Mail: Docket Management Facility; U.S. Department of 
Transportation, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Nassif Building, Room PL-401, 
Washington, DC 20590-001.
    <bullet> Hand Delivery: Room PL-401 on the plaza level of the 
Nassif Building, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC, between 9 
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal Holidays.
    Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or 
comments received, go to http://dms.dot.gov at any time or to Room PL-
401 on the plaza level of the Nassif Building, 400 Seventh Street, SW., 
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, 
except Federal Holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Frances Shaver (202) 267-9681 or 
Tyneka Thomas (202) 267-7626, Office of Rulemaking (ARM-1), Federal 
Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 
20591.
    This notice is published pursuant to 14 CFR 11.85 and 11.91.


[[Page 24675]]


    Issued in Washington, DC, on April 25, 2007.
Pamela Hamilton-Powell,
Director, Office of Rulemaking.

Petitions for Exemption

    Docket No.: FAA-2007-27822.
    Petitioner: CareFlite.
    Section of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 43(h)(i).
    Description of Relief Sought: The exemption, if granted, would 
allow trained CareFlite medical crew members to reposition the copilot 
seat without requiring the pilot to shut down the aircraft and perform 
the function.
[FR Doc. E7-8491 Filed 5-2-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 286 

Expressing the sense of Congress that Earl Lloyd should be recognized 

and honored for breaking the color barrier and becoming the first African-American to play in the National Basketball Association League 

58 years ago. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 29, 2008 

Mr. MORAN of Virginia (for himself, Mr. SCOTT of Virginia, Mr. TOM DAVIS

of Virginia, Mr. PAYNE, Mr. MEEKS of New York, Mr. WOLF, Mr. CONYERS, Mr. CLAY, Mr. TOWNS, Ms. KILPATRICK, Ms. MOORE of Wisconsin, Mr. RUSH, Mr. HASTINGS of Florida, Mr. DAVIS of Illinois, Mr. 

JEFFERSON, Mr. CLEAVER, Mr. OBERSTAR, Mr. MARKEY, Mr. HALL of 

Texas, Mr. SHAYS, Mr. BUTTERFIELD, Mr. AL GREEN of Texas, Mr. 

HINOJOSA, Mr. DELAHUNT, Mr. WATT, Mr. ELLISON, Mr. PALLONE, Mr. 

JOHNSON of Georgia, Mr. BRALEY of Iowa, Mr. SCOTT of Georgia, Ms. 

WATSON, Ms. SLAUGHTER, Mr. LARSON of Connecticut, Mr. KUCINICH, 

Mr. ROSS, Mr. VAN HOLLEN, Mr. CARDOZA, Mr. SERRANO, and Mr. 

MCGOVERN) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of Congress that Earl Lloyd should 

be recognized and honored for breaking the color barrier 

and becoming the first African-American to play in the 

National Basketball Association League 58 years ago. 

Whereas Earl Lloyd was born in Alexandria, Virginia on 

April 3, 1928; 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•HCON 286 IH 

Whereas Earl Lloyd first developed his passion for basketball 

at the city of Alexandria’s segregated Parker-Gray High 

School; 

Whereas Earl Lloyd was drafted by the NBA in 1950 as a 

ninth round pick by the Washington Capitols; 

Whereas on October 31, 1950, Earl Lloyd became the first 

African-American to play in the NBA; 

Whereas Earl Lloyd dissolved the color barrier in the NBA 

3 years after Jackie Robinson had done the same in baseball; 

Whereas Earl Lloyd proudly put his professional career on 

hold and served in the Army for 2 years before returning 

to the NBA; 

Whereas Earl Lloyd played 560 NBA games and won a 

championship before retiring in 1960; 

Whereas in 2003, Earl Lloyd was inducted into the Naismith 

Memorial Basketball Hall of Fame; and 

Whereas the newly constructed basketball court at T.C. Williams in his home town of Alexandria was named in his 

honor: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that Earl 

3 Lloyd should be recognized and honored for breaking the 

4 color barrier and becoming the first African-American to 

5 play in the National Basketball Association League 58 

6 years ago. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 84 (Wednesday, May 2, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 24310]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-8380]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Ocean Transportation Intermediary License Revocations

    The Federal Maritime Commission hereby gives notice that the 
following Ocean Transportation Intermediary licenses have been revoked 
pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984 (46 U.S.C. chapter 
409) and the regulations of the Commission pertaining to the licensing 
of Ocean Transportation Intermediaries, 46 CFR Part 515, effective on 
the corresponding date shown below:

    License Number: 016594NF.
    Name: Asean Logistics, Inc.
    Address: 2400 West Carson Street, Suite 220, Torrance, CA 90501.
    Date Revoked: April 19, 2007.
    Reason: Failed to maintain valid bonds.

    License Number: 020119F.
    Name: Express Forwarding, Inc.
    Address: 12738 N. Florida Avenue, Tampa, FL 33612.
    Date Revoked: April 19, 2007.
    Reason: Failed to maintain a valid bond.

    License Number: 003268F.
    Name: Rialto International, Inc. dba Rialto Ocean Express.
    Address: 4636 East Marginal Way South, Ste. 201, Seattle, WA 98134.
    Date Revoked: March 31, 2007.
    Reason: Failed to maintain a valid bond.

Sandra L. Kusumoto,
Director, Bureau of Certification and Licensing.
 [FR Doc. E7-8380 Filed 5-1-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
Eastern Long Island Sound Eelgrass 2006 Inventory

New London/Paquonock River/Mumford Cove area Sub-basins

Watershed Sub-basin Locus Map

Eelgrass Cover
High

() Medium

{| Low

Field Sites

Eelgrass Found
e Eelgrass Not Found

WATERFORD

New Haven

/\/ Sub-basin Boundary

This map is a product of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's National
Wetlands Inventory Program, Region 5, and was produced for the = ; r.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 1, Office of Ecosystem 4 : a” J 4 r —- Paquonock River area
Protection. 4 p J J = .

Mumford Cove area

New London Harbor area

Eelgrass digital data were derived from photo interpretation of 1:20,000-
scale true color photography dated 6/16/06 with intensive field verification.
ADS 2004 TrueColor, Digital Ortho Imagery were obtained from the University
of Connecticut CES program and used as a geo-referencing baseline for
photography. Interpreted information was generated "on screen", using
USFWS 2002 eelgrass delineations as a base layer. 8

1:20,000

This map was produced with the intent that it be used or displayed at

a scale of 1:20,000. There are no warranties made as to the fitness of 1 2

this map for any unlisted purpose or reproduction at any other than i

the original scale. M iles
# C_2016392EN.01004101.xml

| 24.10.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 392/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.10.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 392/41

---

Judgment of the General Court of 13 September 2016 — Paglieri Sell System v EUIPO (APOTEKE)

(Case T-563/15) (1)

1

((European Union trade mark - Application for figurative mark APOTEKE - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Obligation to state reasons - Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009))

(2016/C 392/53)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Paglieri Sell System SpA (Pozzolo Formigaro, Italy) (represented by: P. Pozzi and F. Braga, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: K. Doherty and L, Rampini, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 23 July 2015 (Case R 2428/2014-5) concerning an application for registration of the figurative sign APOTEKE as a European Union trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Paglieri Sell Systems SpA to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Paglieri Sell Systems SpA to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 371, 9.11.2015.

1

---
No. 48108.

#### Protests 993455-G, etc., of Henry Pollak, Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

Following *United States*v. *Armand Schwab*(30 C. C. P. A. 72, C. A. D. 218) the protests were sustained as to this item.
# C_2015337EN.01000501.xml

| 12.10.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 337/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.10.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 337/5

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État (France) lodged on 16 July 2015 — Association France Nature Environnement v Premier ministre, Ministre de l’écologie, du développement durable et de l’énergie

(Case C-379/15)

(2015/C 337/06)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Referring court

Conseil d’État

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Association France Nature Environnement

Applicant:

Defendants: Premier ministre, Ministre de l’écologie, du développement durable et de l’énergie

Defendants:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1) | Should a national court, exercising its general jurisdiction under EU law, in all cases request a preliminary ruling from the Court of Justice of the European Union so that it can determine whether provisions held by the national court to be contrary to EU law should be maintained temporarily in force? |
| --- | --- |

1)

Should a national court, exercising its general jurisdiction under EU law, in all cases request a preliminary ruling from the Court of Justice of the European Union so that it can determine whether provisions held by the national court to be contrary to EU law should be maintained temporarily in force?

| 2) | If the answer to that first question is in the affirmative, is the decision that may be made by the Conseil d’État to maintain, until 1 January 2016, the effects of the provisions of the Article 1 of the Decree of 2 May 2012 concerning the assessment of certain plans and documents having an impact on the environment, which it holds to be illegal, justified in particular by an overriding consideration linked to the protection of the environment? |
| --- | --- |

2)

If the answer to that first question is in the affirmative, is the decision that may be made by the Conseil d’État to maintain, until 1 January 2016, the effects of the provisions of the Article 1 of the Decree of 2 May 2012 concerning the assessment of certain plans and documents having an impact on the environment, which it holds to be illegal, justified in particular by an overriding consideration linked to the protection of the environment?

---
Before the Second Division,

September 19, 1941

No. 46334.

#### Protests 981907-G, etc., of Sears, Roebuck & Co. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

The testimony showed that the merchandise is sold in the automobile and the blanket departments of plaintiffs’ establishment. The plaintiffs’ witness admitted that they were listed in their catalog as “Utility blankets” and are used at football games, and that he calls them “automobile robes.” From the record the court was of the opinion that the merchandise in question serves all the purposes of blankets and comes within the purview of paragraph 911 (a). The record failing to overcome the presumption of correctness attaching to the collector’s action,- the protests were overruled.
#### Desiree C. NANETTE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John W. SNOW, Secretary, United States Department of the Treasury, Defendant—Appellee.

No. 04-2541.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 24, 2005.

Decided Sept. 22, 2005.

Jeffrey Lawrence Sheldon, The Sheldon Law Firm, Tampa, Florida, for Appellant. John Walter Sippel, Jr., Office of the United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Before TRAXLER, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

*552Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Desiree C. Nanette appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to her former employer in her civil action alleging employment discrimination based upon claims of failure to accommodate her disability. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. *See Nanette v. Snow,*No. CA-03-925-8-RWT (D.Md. Nov. 1, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
EXHIBIT 32.1

Union Carbide Corporation and Subsidiaries

---

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I,
John R. Dearborn, President and Chief Executive Officer of Union Carbide Corporation (the "Corporation"), certify that:

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Union Carbide Corporation and will be retained by Union Carbide Corporation and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

|/s/JOHN R. DEARBORNJohn R. Dearborn
President and Chief Executive Officer
August 5, 2003 | 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 

54

---

QuickLinks
|EXHIBIT 32.1
|------------

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of United-Guardian, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ken Globus, President and Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, to the best of my knowledge and belief, and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Date: August 12, 2008 | By:/s/ Ken GlobusKen GlobusPresident and Principal Executive Officer
|--------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to United-Guardian, Inc. and will be retained by United-Guardian, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.

---
# C_2015371EN.01001501.xml

| 9.11.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 371/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.11.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 371/15

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší soud České republiky (Czech Republic) lodged on 3 August 2015 — New Wave CZ a.s. v Alltoys spol. s r. o.

(Case C-427/15)

(2015/C 371/17)

Language of the case: Czech

Referring court

Referring court

Nejvyšší soud České republiky

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: New Wave CZ a.s.

Applicant:

Defendant: Alltoys spol. s r. o.

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Must Article 8(1) of Directive 2004/48/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the enforcement of intellectual property rights be interpreted as meaning that it is in the context of proceedings concerning an infringement of an intellectual property right if, after the definitive termination of proceedings in which it was declared that an intellectual property right was infringed, the applicant in separate proceedings seeks information on the origin and distribution networks of the goods or services by which that intellectual property right is infringed (for example, for the purpose of being able to quantify the damage precisely and subsequently seek compensation for it)?

1

---

(1)  OJ 2004 L 157, p. 45.

1

---