alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 311 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 311

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF SOAP BOX DERBY RACES ON CAPITOL GROUNDS.

    The Greater Washington Soap Box Derby Association (in this 
resolution referred to as the ``Association'') shall be permitted to 
sponsor a public event, soap box

              

 derby races, on the Capitol Grounds on June 21, 2008, or on such other 
date as the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the Committee 
on Rules and Administration of the Senate may jointly designate.

SEC. 2. CONDITIONS.

    The event to be carried out under this resolution shall be free of 
admission charge to the public and arranged not to interfere with the 
needs of Congress, under conditions to be prescribed by the Architect 
of the Capitol and the Capitol Police Board; except that the 
Association shall assume full responsibility for all expenses and 
liabilities incident to all activities associated with the event.

SEC. 3. STRUCTURES AND EQUIPMENT.

    For the purposes of this resolution, the Association is authorized 
to erect upon the Capitol Grounds, subject to the approval of the 
Architect of the Capitol, such stage, sound amplification devices, and 
other related structures and equipment as may be required for the event 
to be carried out under this resolution.

SEC. 4. ADDITIONAL ARRANGEMENTS.

    The Architect of the Capitol and the Capitol Police Board are 
authorized to make any such additional arrangements that may be 
required to carry out the event under this resolution.

SEC. 5. ENFORCEMENT OF RESTRICTIONS.

    The Capitol Police Board shall provide for enforcement of the 
restrictions contained in section 5104(c) of title 40, United States 
Code, concerning sales, advertisements, displays, and solicitations on 
the Capitol Grounds, as well as other restrictions applicable to the 
Capitol Grounds, with respect to the event to be carried out under this 
resolution.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 4, 2008.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
110th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                            H. CON. RES. 311

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the Greater Washington 
                            Soap Box Derby.
```
<PAGE>   1



                                                                      Exhibit 12

                            USL CAPITAL CORPORATION
                            AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES


               COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                               THREE MONTHS ENDED       NINE MONTHS ENDED
                                                                  SEPTEMBER 30,            SEPTEMBER 30,
                                                             ---------------------    ----------------------
(UNAUDITED; IN THOUSANDS)                                       1996        1995        1996         1995    
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                         <C>         <C>          <C>          <C>
EARNINGS:
Income before taxes on income per statement of income        $ 294,793   $  44,946    $ 405,294    $ 126,091
Add
  Fixed charges                                                 56,243      71,413      211,317      206,913
  Distributions and proceeds in excess of
    net income of associated companies                             217         151        1,284          363
                                                             ---------    --------    ---------    ---------

Income as adjusted                                           $ 351,253   $ 116,510    $ 617,895    $ 333,367
                                                             =========   =========    =========    =========

FIXED CHARGES:
Interest on indebtedness including amortization of debt
  issue costs and discount or premium thereon                $  55,873   $  70,683    $ 209,645    $ 204,761
Interest factor of annual rentals(1)                               370         730        1,672        2,152
                                                             ---------    --------    ---------    ---------

Fixed charges                                                $  56,243   $  71,413    $ 211,317    $ 206,913
                                                             =========   =========    =========    =========

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                                 6.2         1.6          2.9          1.6
                                                             =========   =========    =========    =========
</TABLE>





(1)  The interest portion of annual rentals is estimated to be one-third
     of such rentals.





                                       13
Eastern Long Island Sound Eelgrass 2006 Inventory
General Eelgrass Distribution

Cockaponset State Forest I

Legend

(BN 2006 Eelgrass Distribution
Subbasin Boundary

ve
### U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY PUBLIC MEETING ON ENERGY CONSERVATION STANDARDS FOR WATER HEATERS, DIRECT HEATING EQUIPMENT AND POOL HEATERS U.S. Department of Energy Room 1E-245 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington , DC 20585 January 16, 2006 Purpose: The Department will present its methodology for conducting the energy conservation standards rulemaking for residential water heaters, direct heating equipment and pool heaters. The Department also will seek input from stakeholders on its planned methodologies, assumptions, and data sources. 

### Agenda 9:00 - 9:05 a.m . Welcome and Opening Remarks 9:05 - 9:25 a.m
. Introductions and Agenda Review 9:25 - 9:40 a.m . Introduction and Analytical Methodology 9:40 - 10 : 00 a.m. Brief Stakeholder Statements 10:00

- 11:15 a.m. Market and Technology Assessment , Screening Analysis, and Engineering Analysis 

### 11:15 - 11:30 a.m. Break 11:30 - 12:00 p.m. Market and Technology Assessment, Screening Analysis, and Engineering Analysis (continued) 

### 12:00

- 1:00 p.m. Break for Lunch 1:00 - 2:15 p.m. Energy and Water Use, Markups for Equipment Price Determination, and Life-Cycle Cost and Payback Period Analysis 2:15 - 2:55 p. m. Shipments Analysis, National Impact Analysis, and LCC Subgroup Analysis 2:55 - 3:15 p
.m. Manufacturer Impact Analysis 3:15 - 3:30 p.m. Break 3:30 - 4 : 00 p.m. Utility Impact Analysis , Employment Impact Analysis, Environmental Assessment, and Regulatory Impact Analysis 4:00 - 4 : 45 p.m. Other Issues and Comments / Closing Remarks 

### 4:45 p.m. Adjourn
### The bauxite deposits of Floyd, Bartow, and Polk counties of northwest Georgia

By: Walter S. WhiteN. M. Denson

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/cir193

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Most of the bauxite deposits ipf northwest Georgia are in the Hermitage, Bobo, and Cave Spring districts in Floyd, Bartow, and Polk Counties. The region has produced in the neighborhood of 400,000 tons of bauxite from about 65 small mines, but the known reserves of high grade bauxite are very small. The region was studied in 1942-43 as part of the strategic minerals program of the U. S. Geological Survey.

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
April 5, 1971

No. 71-18

#### Thomas T. Swisher, Formerly PFC, U. S. Army v United States Board of Parole.

ORDERED:

That said Petition for Reconsideration, and said motion, be, and the same are hereby, denied.
ACCEPTED

06-16-00123-CR

SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS

TEXARKANA, TEXAS

7/6/2016 3:16:05 PM

DEBBIE AUTREY

CLERK

 FILED IN 6th COURT OF APPEALS TEXARKANA, TEXAS 7/6/2016 3:16:05 PM DEBBIE AUTREY Clerk
(logo)ncb

National Cooperative Bank

 

2011 Crystal Drive

Suite, 800

Arlington, VA 22202                                                                                                                                             

** **

**FORMOF ANNUAL COMPLIANCE STATEMENT**

CERTIFICATIONWells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Trust 2016-C33, Commercial MortgagePass-Through Certificates, Series 2016-C33 (the “Trust”)

I, Karyn Mann, on behalfof National Cooperative Bank, N.A., as NCB Special Servicer (the “CertifyingServicer”), certify to Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Securities, Inc. andits officers, directors and affiliates, and with the knowledge and intent thatthey will rely upon this certification, that:

1.                 I (or Servicing Officers undermy supervision) have reviewed theCertifying Servicer’s activities during the preceding calendar year betweenJanuary 1, 2017 and December 31, 2017 (the “ReportingPeriod”) and the Certifying Servicer’s performance under the Pooling andServicing Agreement; and

2.                 To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Certifying Servicer hasfulfilled all of its obligations under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement inall material respects during the Reporting Period. 

Date: February 6, 2018

National Cooperative Bank, N.A., as NCB Special Servicer

By: /s/ Karyn MannName: Karyn MannTitle: Senior Vice President
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 99-3383

___________ Maria O. Vasquez-Leyva, * * Petitioner, * * Petition for Review of an v. * Order of the Immigration * and Naturalization Service. Immigration and Naturalization * Service; United States Department * [UNPUBLISHED] of Justice, * * Respondents. *

___________ Submitted: March 2, 2000 Filed: March 8, 2000

___________ Before RICHARD S. ARNOLD, BOWMAN, and BEAM, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. MariaO. Vasquez-Leyva petitions for review of an order of the Board of ImmigrationAppeals (BIA), which dismissed her appeal from an Immigration Judge’s (IJ’s) denial of her request for asylum and withholding of deportation. Upon careful review of the record and the parties’ briefs, we conclude that reasonable, substantial, and probative evidence in the record as a whole supports the BIA’s determination that Vasquez- Leyva failed to establish past persecution or an objectively reasonable fear of future persecution. See 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(42)(A) (Supp. IV 1998) (refugee is alien-2-

unwilling to return to home country because of “persecution or a well-founded fear of persecution on account of race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion”); Kratchmarov v. Heston , 172 F.3d 551, 553 (8th Cir. 1999) (well-founded fear must be subjectively genuine and objectively reasonable); Feleke v. INS , 118 F.3d 594, 598 (8th Cir. 1997) (standard of review). Specifically, we agree that Vasquez-Leyva failed to establish a causal nexus between her brother’s death in 1978 by unknown persons for unknown reasons, her undocumented membership in a political party, and anonymous notes and a single physical encounter with guerillas in 1993. See Ghasemimehr v. INS , 7 F.3d 1389, 1390 (8th Cir. 1993) (per curiam) (alien seeking asylum must show persecution or feared persecution is based on one of § 1101(a)(42)(A)’s five grounds). We also agree she did not show her fear of future persecution is objectively reasonable given that neither she nor her family (who remain in Guatemala) have suffered harm or threats from the guerillas since 1993, and that the guerillas signed a peace accord in 1996 ending the civil war. See Manivong v. INS , 164 F.3d 432, 433 (8th Cir. 1999) (affirming in part where petitioner’s father and children remained in home country without incident); 8 C.F.R. § 208.13(b)(1)(i) (1999) (if applicant has established past persecution, well-founded fear of future persecution is presumed unless conditions in applicant’s country have changed to such extent that applicant no longer has wellfo unded fear). We therefore affirm the denial of asylum, as well as the denial of withholding of deportation, see Kratchmarov , 172 F.3d at 555. Accordingly, we deny Vasquez-Leyva’s petition. A true copy.

Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
October 29, 1957

Reap. Dec. 9018.

#### American *Commercial Inc.*v. *United States.*

Entered at New York, N. Y. [Not published.] Motion by plaintiff.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

July 31, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

130632 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 130632 

 COA: 267273 

Wexford CC: 04-007363-FH 

ROBERT PETER EARL,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 24, 2006 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

p0724 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

July 31, 2006 

 Clerk
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications.

 

 

I, Anthony Sfarra, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports onForm 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report onForm 10-K of the Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Trust 2016-C33 (the"Exchange Act periodic reports");

 

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, takenas a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing andother information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the periodcovered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statementsrequired in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except asdisclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilledtheir obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and

 

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteriafor asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessmentof compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required tobe included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB andExchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to thisreport, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances ofnoncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report onForm 10-K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied oninformation provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:

 

National Cooperative Bank, N.A., as NCB Master Servicer, RialtoCapital Advisors, LLC, as Special Servicer, National Cooperative Bank, N.A., asNCB Special Servicer, Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee, ParkBridge Lender Services LLC, as Operating Advisor, CoreLogic Solutions, LLC, asServicing Function Participant, Computershare Trust Company, NationalAssociation, as Servicing Function Participant for the CertificateAdministrator, Computershare Trust Company, National Association, as ServicingFunction Participant for the Custodian, Trimont Real Estate Advisors, LLC, asSpecial Servicer for the 225 Liberty Street Mortgage Loan, Wilmington Trust,National Association, as Trustee for the 225 Liberty Street Mortgage Loan,Citibank, N.A., as Custodian for the 225 Liberty Street Mortgage Loan,CoreLogic Solutions, LLC, as Servicing Function Participant for the 225 LibertyStreet Mortgage Loan, National Tax Search, LLC, as Servicing FunctionParticipant for the 225 Liberty Street Mortgage Loan, and U.S. Bank NationalAssociation, as Servicing Function Participant for the 225 Liberty StreetMortgage Loan.

 

 

 

Dated:March 17,2023

 

 

/s/ Anthony Sfarra

Anthony Sfarra 

President

(seniorofficer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
No. 40394.

#### Protests 958369-G, etc., of Cline Stewart Co., Inc., et al. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Sullivan, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of uninflated rubber balls or so-called beach balls the same as those the subject of *United States*v. *Woolworth*(24 C. C. P. A. 338, T. D. 48770). The claim at 30 percent under paragraph 1502 was therefore sustained.
No. 44239.

#### Protests 840977-G, etc., of A. Hirschberger (New York).

Opinion by

Bbown, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is bodies, hoods,, forms, or shapes similar to those the subject of *Cohn*v. *United States*(4 Cust. Ct. 166, C. D. 314). The protests were therefore sustained.
# C_2016027EN.01001902.xml

| 25.1.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 27/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.1.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 27/19

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from Court of Appeal (England & Wales) (Civil Division) (United Kingdom) made on 13 November 2015 — Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs v British Film Institute

(Case C-592/15)

(2016/C 027/23)

Language of the case: English

Referring court

Referring court

Court of Appeal (England & Wales) (Civil Division)

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs

Applicant:

Defendant: British Film Institute

Defendant:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| i. | Are the terms of Article 13A(1)(n) of the Sixth Directive (1), in particular the words ‘certain cultural services’, sufficiently clear and precise such that Article 13A(1)(n) is of direct effect so as to exempt the supply of those cultural services by bodies governed by public law or other recognised cultural bodies, such as the supplies made by the Respondent in the present case, in the absence of any domestic implementing legislation? |
| --- | --- |

i.

Are the terms of Article 13A(1)(n) of the Sixth Directive (1), in particular the words ‘certain cultural services’, sufficiently clear and precise such that Article 13A(1)(n) is of direct effect so as to exempt the supply of those cultural services by bodies governed by public law or other recognised cultural bodies, such as the supplies made by the Respondent in the present case, in the absence of any domestic implementing legislation?

1

| ii. | Do the terms of Article 13A(1)(n) of the Sixth Directive, in particular the words ‘certain cultural services’, permit Member States any discretion in their application by means of implementing legislation and, if so, what discretion? |
| --- | --- |

ii.

Do the terms of Article 13A(1)(n) of the Sixth Directive, in particular the words ‘certain cultural services’, permit Member States any discretion in their application by means of implementing legislation and, if so, what discretion?

| iii. | Do the same conclusions as above apply to Article 132(1)(n) of the Principal VAT Directive (2)? |
| --- | --- |

iii.

Do the same conclusions as above apply to Article 132(1)(n) of the Principal VAT Directive (2)?

2

---

(1)  Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonization of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment

1

OJ L 145, p. 1.

(2)  Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax

2

OJ L 347, p. 1.

---
No. 45187.

#### Protests 897241-G, etc., of Sprouse Reitz Co. (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Keeps, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of Rockingham earthenware similar to that the subject of *Butler*v. *United States*(4 Cust. Ct. 120, C. D. 303). The claim at 25 percent under paragraph 210 was therefore sustained.