alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(Reap. Dec. 8288)

#### Westfeldt Brothers *v.*United States

Entry No. 243, etc.

(Decided February 4, 1954)

*Barnes, Richardson & Colburn*for the plaintiff.

*Warren E. Burger,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

*588Ekwall, Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement relate to importations of chocolate imported from Cuba, and entered at the port of New Orleans, La. They have been submitted without evidence other than that contained in the official papers. Upon the record I find that the presumption of correctness attaching to the appraiser’s finding of value has not been overcome. I therefore find that the proper value in each case is the value found by the appraiser.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
(Reap. Dec. 9400)

#### Air Express Int’l Agency, Inc. *v.*United States

Entry Nos. M 124; M 883.

(Decided April 21, 1959)

Plaintiff not represented by counsel.

*George Goohran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General *(Mollie Strum,*trial attorney, for the defendant.

*611Rao, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed above relate to several importations of bamboo blind material and cotton tape, which were entered at their respective invoiced unit values, packing included. In making his return of value, the appraiser added to the invoiced unit values, net packed, charges for inland freight, storage, insurance, hauling, and lighterage, as invoiced.

When these cases were called for trial, the respective parties hereto orally agreed that the manufacturer’s ex-factory prices, as represented by the entered values, constituted the proper values of the involved merchandise.

Based upon the agreed facts, I find the entered values to be the proper values for the merchandise here involved.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
EXHIBIT 99.2

            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                          AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
              SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Trinity Companies, Inc. (the "Company") Annual
Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Christine R. Larson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Date:  February 26, 2003            /s/ CHRISTINE R. LARSON
                                        ------------------------------
                                        Christine R. Larson
                                        Chief Financial Officer
No. 46328.

#### Protests 909153-G, etc., of Oregon Fibre Flax Growers Assn. et al. (Portland, Oreg.).

Opinion by

Dallingeb, J.

The papers disclosing no reason for disturbing the collector’s action the protests were overruled'and the decision of the collector affirmed in each instance.
SERVED: March 21,2016 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS ~ 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

SOLID EDGE AVIATION, LLC 

DOCKET NO. F AA-20 15-2436 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

ORDER REASSIGNING PROCEEDING 

Administrative Law Judge Richard C. Goodwin has transferred to the Food and Drug 

Administration. Accordingly, this proceeding is hereby reassigned from Judge Goodwin to 

Administrative Law Judge Douglas M. Rawald. Any dates set for hearing or prehearing 

conference are suspended until further notice. All other orders remain in full force and effect 

absent further order. 

SO ORDERED. 

Attachment-Service List 
SERVICE LIST - BY U.S. MAIL 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1 0001 

ONE COPY 

Darryl M. Williams, Respondent's Counsel 

Baird, Williams & Greer, LLP 

6225 North 241

h Street, Suite 125 

Phoenix, AZ 85016 

TEL: 602-256-9400 

FAX: 602-271-9308 

Jeffrey M. Harper, Complainant's Counsel 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Northwest Mountain Region, ANM-7 

1601 Lind A venue Southwest 

Renton, WA 98057 

TEL: 425-227-2161 

FAX: 425-227-1007 

The Honorable Douglas M. Rawald, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

. 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (El1-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-5121 Staff Assistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

Docket No. FAA-2015-2436 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

1 Service was by U.S. MaiL For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2WIOOO, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
EXHIBIT 32a

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with
the Quarterly Report of Twin Disc, Incorporated (the Company) on Form 10-Q for
the fiscal quarter ending September 28, 2007, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission as of the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael E. Batten,
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

|(1) | The Report
      fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and                         
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) | The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.
|   

/s/ MICHAEL E. BATTENMichael E.
BattenChairman, President and ChiefExecutive
OfficerNovember 7, 2007

---
(Reap. Dec. 9598)

#### American Express Company *v.*United States

Entry Nos. 899423; 908148.

(Decided February 19, 1960)

Plaintiff not represented by counsel.

*George CocKran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

*571Lawrence, Judge:

When the above-enumerated appeals for a re-appraisement were called for hearing, there was no appearance on behalf of plaintiff.

An examination of the official records discloses no reason for disturbing the presumptively correct value for the merchandise found by the appraiser.

I, therefore, find and hold the proper dutiable value of the merchandise covered by said appeals to be the value found by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
No. 47601.

#### Protests 770137-G, etc., of American Lime Corp. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
INTERNET BUSINESS'S INTERNATIONAL, INC.
          3900 Birch Street Suite 111 Newport Beach, Calif. 92660
          Telephone (949) 833-0261; Facsimile (949) 833-0762

November 1, 1999


Optical Brigade
4389 Getwell Rd.
Memphis, Tennessee 38118

Attn: Wade Whitley

Re:  Acquisition of Optical Brigade

Via email webmasters@realty-solution.com

Dear Mr. Whitely:

The following proposal from Internet Business's International,
Inc (IBUI) is for the acquisition of  the Optical Brigade .com
and all of sunglasscentral and aces marketing URLs. The reason
for this is I solely own these marketing URLs and with your offer
I would not be able to payoff my partner on sunglasscentral and
ace. This will not change the volume numbers as the marketing
URLs are what provides the sales.

The marketing URLs are:
www.smithsunglass.com
www.h2optics-sunglasses.com
www.rayban-sunglasses.com
www.oceanwave-sunglasses.com
www.porsche-sunglasses.com
www.bolle-sunglasses.com
www.revo-sunglasses.com
www.gucci-sunglasses.com
www.serengetisunglasses.com

The base URLs are:
www.optical-brigade.com
www.sunglassesbattalion.com
www.telescopebattalion.com
www.binocularbattalion.com

We will pay to  your group $500.00  as a monthly fee from the
revenue generated by the site, to maintain and upgrade the
internet search engine activities to the sites.

We will issue 400,000  shares of IBUI stock restricted as per
rule 144 to you or your designee.

The purchase price include all inventory and shipping supplies as
of the date of closing.

The purchase price includes all the of the following;

(a)  all the contracts with the suppliers and contact information
(b)  the customer client base and contact information
(c)   product ordering procedures and forms
(d)  Virtual Cart Shopping Cart , Virtual Credit Card Processing
     Terminal (Authorize.Net (American Express, MasterCard, Visa,
     Discover/Novus and on line checks) This is a durable good sic
     code account) Lease from Northern Leasing for Authorize.Net
     amount is 48 month lease at $59.00 dollars per month
(e)  invoicing and shipping procedures
(f)  procedure manual for operations
(g)  source codes for operations

The domains will be transferred over to IBUI.

Hosting to be transferred over to LA Internet.

Any and all copyrights, patents and trademarks associated with
the site.

Most recent financials and or financial information for the site

Time frame for closing 15 days or sooner.

If these terms and conditions are agreeable to you please
indicate by return e-mail, and sign and fax back, and mail
original to me.

If you have any questions please call me at 949-833-0261.

Sincerely



/s/  Albert Reda
Albert Reda, CEO

Read and Accepted by


/s/  Wade Whitely
Wade Whitely
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v PETER J. BOGENREIF, Private E-2, U. S. Army, Appellant

8 USCMA 496, 24 CMR 306

No. 10,524

Decided December 13, 1957

*Colonel Edward M. O’Connell*and *First Lieutenant William L. Garwood*were on the brief for Appellant, Accused.

*Lieutenant Colonel John G. Lee*and *First Lieutenant Jay D. Fischer*were on the brief for Appellee, United States.

Opinion of the Court

Homer Ferguson, Judge:

The accused’s conviction of desertion must be set aside because of the law officer’s erroneous instruction regard*497ing the inference to be drawn from a much-prolonged absence. United States v Cothern, 8 USCMA 158, 23 CMR 382, and United States v Soccio, 8 USCMA 477, 24 CMR 287. Accordingly, the record of trial is returned to The Judge Advocate General of the Army for reference to a board of review. The board may, in its discretion, order a rehearing on the desertion charge or approve the lesser offense of absence without leave and reassess the sentence on the basis of the remaining approved findings of guilt.

Chief Judge Quinn concurs.

Latimer, Judge

(dissenting):

I dissent for the reasons set forth in my separate opinion in United States v Soccio, 8 USCMA 477, 24 CMR 287.
# C_2016136EN.01003402.xml

| 18.4.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 136/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.4.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 136/34

---

Order of the General Court of 15 February 2016 — InAccess Networks Integrated Systems v Commission

(Case T-82/15) (1)

1

((Seventh framework programme of the European Community for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007 to 2013) - Grant agreement for the Atraco project - Debit notes and decisions contained in letters - No need to adjudicate in part - Contractual nature of the dispute - Partial inadmissibility))

(2016/C 136/49)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: InAccess Networks Integrated Systems — Applications Services for Telecommunication and Related Equipment Commercial and Industrial Co. SA (Maroussi, Greece) (represented by: J. Grayston, Solicitor, P. Gjørtler and G. Pandey, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Di Paolo and J. Estrada de Solà, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of the Commission decision contained in the letter of 11 December 2014 by which the Commission confirmed its refusal to finance costs invoked by the applicant, of the Commission decision contained in debit note No 3241211514 of 23 October 2012, and of the Commission decision contained in the letter of 7 December 2012 requesting the applicant to return the funds paid and to pay liquidated damages of EUR 12 814,10.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

The Court:

| 1. | Rules that there is no longer any need to adjudicate on the claims directed against the Commission decision contained in the letter of 7 October 2012 and the debit note of 23 October 2012; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Rules that there is no longer any need to adjudicate on the claims directed against the Commission decision contained in the letter of 7 October 2012 and the debit note of 23 October 2012;

| 2. | Dismisses the action for the remainder, as being manifestly inadmissible; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the action for the remainder, as being manifestly inadmissible;

| 3. | Orders InAccess Networks Integrated Systems — Applications Services for Telecommunication and Related Equipment Commercial and Industrial Co. SA to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders InAccess Networks Integrated Systems — Applications Services for Telecommunication and Related Equipment Commercial and Industrial Co. SA to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 155, 11.5.2015.

1

---
#### Hudson Shipping Co., Inc. *v.*United States

No. 6250.

Entry No. 703340, etc.

Invoices dated Mexico, D. F., June 6, 1945, etc.

Certified June 6, 1945, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., July 26, 1945, etc.

*318(Decided January 25, 1946)

No appearance by the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General *(Samuel D. Spector,*special attorney), for the defendant.

Kincheloe, Judge:

When these appeals for reappraisement were 'called on the calendar, no appearance was made on behalf of the plaintiff, although duly notified of the time and place thereof.

■ As this record contains no evidence to warrant a disturbance of •the values reported by the appraiser, I find the proper values to be .the appraised values.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.6



                              ASSIGNMENT AGREEMENT



Effective April 19, 1999

BETWEEN:

     CYBEROAD GAMING CORPORATION, a St. Kitts corporation having a place of
     business at Box 174, Basseterre, St. Kitts, West Indies

                                                                (the "Assignor")

AND

     CYBEROAD.COM (ISLE OF MAN) LIMITED, an Isle of Man corporation having a
     place of business at International House, Castle Hill, Victoria Road,
     Douglas, Isle of Man, IM2 4RB

                                                                (the "Assignee")

1.0  ASSIGNMENT

     1.1  In consideration of the sum of one hundred thousand U.S. dollars
          ($100,000.00 U.S.) and other good and valuable consideration, the
          receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the Assignor
          hereby transfers, conveys, and assigns to the Assignee;

     1.2  all of its rights, title and benefit as well as its obligations and
          responsibilities pursuant to an Operating License, Revenue Sharing and
          Management Agreement dated May 5, 1998 between the Assignor and Asanol
          Management Corporation;

     1.3  the said Agreement dated May 5, 1998.

2.0  DOCUMENTS

     The documents which are the subject of this Assignment Agreement are
     attached hereto and marked Schedule "A"
<PAGE>   2
                                       2



3.0  SUCCESSORS

     This Agreement shall enure to the benefit of the Assignee and shall be
     binding upon the Assignor and its executors, successors and assigns.

4.0  GOVERNING LAW

     This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the
     laws of Isle of Man.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have caused these presents to be executed
personally or by their duly authorized officers as of the day and year first
written above.

CYBEROAD GAMING CORPORATION           CYBEROAD.COM (ISLE OF MAN) LIMITED



Per: /s/ LAWRENCE COFIELD             Per:  /s/ JOHN COFFEY
    --------------------------             --------------------------

Name:  Lawrence Cofield               Name:  John Coffey
Title: Director                       Title: Director
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Corporate Trust Services**

  MAC R1204-010  9062 Old Annapolis Road  Columbia, MD 21045  Tel: 410 884 2000  Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc. 

1585 BROADWAY

NEW YORK, New York 10036-8200

 

Re: Annual Statement ofCompliance for Morgan Stanley Bank of America Merrill Lynch Trust 2016-C29,Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2016-C29

 

Per the Pooling and ServicingAgreement dated as of May 1, 2016 (the "Agreement"), the undersigned,a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as CertificateAdministrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows as of andfor the year ending December 31, 2016 (the "Reporting Period"):

 

(a) A review of Wells Fargo'sactivities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under theAgreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and

 

(b) To the best of suchofficer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of itsobligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

 

February 27, 2017

 

 

/s/ Brian Smith

BRIAN SMITH

Vice President

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll  go far |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------|
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 25, 2019

No. 04

- 19

- 00196

- CV

IN THE GUARDIANSHIP OF JAMES E. FAIRLEY

,

From the Probate Court No 2, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2011

- PC

- 1068 Honorable Polly Jackson Spencer, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

The trial court clerk has filed a clerk’s record. However, the clerk’s record does not comply with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 34.5(a), which lists the documents that must be

included in the clerk ’ s record “ [u]nless the parties designate the filings in the appellate record by agreement under Rule 34.2. ” T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 34.5. Rule 34.5(a) provides that i n civil cases, the

documents to be included in the clerk’s record are the following:

(1) all pl eadings on which the trial was held; (2) the court ’ s docket sheet, (3) the court ’ s charge and the jury ’ s verdict, or the court ’ s findings of fact and conclusions of law; (4) the court ’ s judgment or other order that is being appealed; (5) any request fo r findings of fact and conclusions of law, any post

judgment motion, and the court ’ s order on the motion; (6) the notice of appeal; (7) any formal bill of exception; (8) any request for a reporter ’ s record, including any statement of points or issues under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 34.6(c); (9) any request for preparation of the clerk ’ s record; (10) a certified bill of costs including the cost of preparing the clerk ’ s record, showing credits for payments made; and (11) any filing that a party design ates to have included in the record.

In this appeal, appellant appeals from the trial court’s order denying appellant’s motion to dismiss pursuant to the Texas Citizens Participation Act. See T EX

. C IV

. P RAC

. & R EM

. C ODE
A NN

. § 27.001

- 27.011. The clerk’s record does not contain all pleadings and orders relating to the denial of this motion. We ORDER the trial court clerk to file a supplemental clerk’s record

on or before May 6, 2019 containing the following documents:1. Order Dismissing Application for Appointment of Permanent Guardian of the Person signed on September 19, 2014;

2. Motion to Transfer Matter Related to Guardianship filed on January 7, 2019;

3. Objection to the Court Transferring District Court Case Into Terminated Guardianship filed on January 14, 2019;

4. Order Transferring Cause signed on February 28, 2019;

5. Answer/Response filed on March 14, 2019;

6. Plaintiff’s First Amended Petition filed on March 14, 2019; and

7. Response to Rule 91a Motion filed on March 21, 2019. 1

_________________________________ Liz a A. Rodriguez , Justice

IN WIT NESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 25th day of April, 2019

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court

1 We recognize that appellant attached some of these pleadings to her motion to dismiss filed on March 6, 2019. However, a clerk’s record must include the actual pleadings filed; the attachment of the pleadings to another motion

is not sufficient

.
No. 42010.

#### Protest 903389-G of F. W. Myers & Co., Inc.

C. D. 191. Application by plaintiff for rehearing denied.
My	name	is	Jacob	Southard,	and	I	would	like	an	FAA	petition	for	exemption	to	be

able	to	professionally	fly	my	DJI	Inspire	One	quadcopter. I	am	a	freelance	videographer/cinematographer	and	would	like	to	LEGALLY	be	able to	fly	my	quadcopter for	professional	aerial	video	and	pictures. I	graduated	from	Missouri	Western	State	University	in	2014	with	a	Bachelor’s degree	in	Cinema. My	website: www.jakesouthardcinema.com I	have	heard	of	other	pro fessionals	applying	for	an	FAA	exemption	under	section 333	that	grants	permissions	to	be	able	to	fly	anywhere	(besides	airports	and restricted	areas),	while	keeping	line	of	site,	and	under	200	feet	altitude.

My	cell	phone	number	is	8163907590 And	can	al so	be	reached	at	Jakesouthardcinemallc@gmail.com
U. S. Department of Transportation

Docket Management Facility

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE

West Building Ground Floor, Room W12

- 140

Washington, DC 20590



## Application to Amend

Section 333 Exemption No. xxxxx

Regulatory Docket No. FAA

- 20158663

Wednesday, August 31, 2016

Petitioner:

A Top Shot LLC

Austin Hilgenberg, CEO

1695 Hunter Drive

Wayzata, MN 55391

Email: Austin@Atopshot.com

Dear Sir or Ma’am,

By letter from the FAA dated Dec 30 201 5

, an exemption has yet to be granted to A Top Shot LLC for

relief under Section 333. That letter was marked Section 333 Exemption Regulatory Docket No. FAA

2015

- 8663

.

Austin Hilgenberg hereby requests that the exemption so granted be amended to include Matrice 600/DJI

models. Relevant facts and reasoning are:

• DJI has developed a commercial grade UAS that adheres to the FAA rules and regulations.

• Similarities to DJI Inspire 1:

o Pixhawk flight controller

o Flight modes: Loiter, Altitude hold, Return to Launch and Land

o Emergency modes: Loss of co mms, Low battery, Return to Launch, etc

o Voltage/current sensor

o Communications: 915Mhz for Telemetry, 2.4 for R/C control and 5.8Ghz for video

• Size, weight and performance specification of the SUI Endurance are as follows:

o Flying weight: 15.1KG (x.0LB)

o Di agonal Size: 1133mm

o Maximum climb rate: 5m/s

o Maximum descent rate: 3cm/s

o Maximum pitch/roll angle: 25 degrees

o Maximum flight time: 40 minutes

Privacy

The Matrice 600 / DJI systems Operating and Maintenance Handbook will be submitted separately and

confi dentially under 14 C.F.R. 11.35(b), as the Handbook contains proprietary information that the

applicant has not and will not share with others. The Handbook contains operating conditions and

procedures that are not available to the public and are protected from release under the Freedom of

Information Act, 5 U.S.C. §§ 552, et seq. (

Thank you for your consideration of this important request. Please advise us of any additional information

t hat is required.

Sincerely,

Austin Hilgenberg

CEO, A Top Shot LLC