alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          20,400
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  460,400
<ALLOWANCES>                                    13,400
<INVENTORY>                                    276,400
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               838,500
<PP&E>                                         775,400
<DEPRECIATION>                                 318,400
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,295,100
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          361,000
<BONDS>                                        300,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         8,400
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,323,200
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,295,100
<SALES>                                        681,200
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               681,200
<CGS>                                          280,200
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  280,200
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               310,300
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   900
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              15,700
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 74,100
<INCOME-TAX>                                    20,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             54,100
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    54,100
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .71
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .69
        

</TABLE>
No. 48083.

#### Protests 78943-K, etc., of New York Mdse. Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of *New York Merchandise Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(8 Cust. Ct. 209, C. D. 607) brass base shells were held dutiable at 35 percent under paragraph 353, as parts of articles having as an essential feature an electrical element or device, such as signs, as claimed. It was also stipulated that the marcel irons in question are similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 38680. They were therefore held dutiable as household utensils at 40 percent under paragraph 339, as claimed.
```

[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 77 (Monday, April 23, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 20110]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-7652]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Environmental Management Site-Specific Advisory Board, Nevada

AGENCY: Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces a meeting of the Environmental 
Management Site-Specific Advisory Board (EM SSAB), Nevada Test Site. 
The Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 86 Stat. 770) 
requires that public notice of this meeting be announced in the Federal 
Register.

DATES: Wednesday, May 9, 2007, 5 p.m.

ADDRESSES: 7710 West Cheyenne Avenue, Conference Room 130, Las 
Vegas, Nevada.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kelly Snyder, Deputy Designated 
Federal Officer, P.O. Box 98518, Las Vegas, Nevada 89193. Phone: (702) 
295-2836; E-mail: [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Purpose of the Board: The purpose of the Board is to make 
recommendations to DOE in the areas of environmental restoration, waste 
management, and related activities.
    Tentative Agenda:
    1. Briefing on Role in Environmental Management Activities, Nevada 
Division of Environmental Protection.
    2. Updates by the Board's working committees.
    Public Participation: The meeting is open to the public. Written 
statements may be filed with the Board either before or after the 
meeting. Individuals who wish to make oral presentations pertaining to 
agenda items should contact Kelly Snyder at the telephone number listed 
above. The request must be received five days prior to the meeting and 
reasonable provision will be made to include the presentation in the 
agenda. The Deputy Designated Federal Officer is empowered to conduct 
the meeting in a fashion that will facilitate the orderly conduct of 
business. Individuals wishing to make public comment will be provided a 
maximum of five minutes to present their comments.
    Minutes: The minutes of this meeting will be available for public 
review and copying at the U.S. Department of Energy's Freedom of 
Information Public Reading Room, 1E-190, Forrestal Building, 1000 
Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20585 between 9 a.m. and 4 
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Minutes will also 
be available by writing to Kelly Snyder at the address listed above.

    Issued at Washington, DC on April 17, 2007.
Rachel Samuel,
Deputy Advisory Committee Management Officer.
 [FR Doc. E7-7652 Filed 4-20-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
```
No. 50639.

#### Protest 784540-G of W. R. Zanes & Co. (Galveston).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

In accordance with stipulation that the merchandise consists of cotton rags the same in all material respects as those the subject of Abstract 47174, the protest was sustained as claimed.
# Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Agency HEREBY ISSUES AN ORDER OF APPROVAL TO CONSTRUCT, INSTALL, OR ESTABLISH

Holnam Inc. (Cement Plant) Main Stack Opacity Stand&.rd.

NICHOLAS F. STIREN A p BOLNAM, INC., IDEAL DIVISION 

### p I:. 

### 5400 W MARGINAL 

### WY SW I 

## o BOLNAM, INC., IDEALDIVISION 

### w N 

### 5400 W MARGINAL 

### WY SW B

### Regi~on No; 

## 14046

Notice of Construction No. 

### 5183 

# fF"''

... . _a ') Date · ·

C SEATrLE WA 

### 98106-159!) R SEATrLE WA 

### 98106-15!1!) A N T INSTALLATION ADDRESS BOLNAM,INC., IDEALDMSION, 

### 5400 WMARGINAL 

### WY SW, SEATrLE, WA, 

### 98106

THIS ORDBR IS ISSUBD SUBJECT TOTHEFOLLOWING RESTRICTIONS AND CONDmONS



### I. Approval is hereby granted as provided in Article 

### 6 ofRegulation 

### I ofthe Puget Sound 

### Air Pollution Control Agency to the applicant to illlltall or



### establish the equipment, device orprocess described hereon at the INSTALLATION ADDRESS in accordance with the plans and specifications onfile in the Engineering Division ofPSAPCA. · 2. Compliance with this ORDBR and its conditions does not relieve the owner oropemtor from the**respons~"bility** ofcompliance with RegulatioiiS I, D or

## m, RCW 70.94 orany other emission control requirements, nor from the resulting liabilities and/or legal remedies for fililure to comply. Section S.OS(e) of Regulation I requires that the owner oroperator must develop and implement an operation and msintensnce 

### (O&M) plan to assure continuous compliance with Regulations I, D, and 

# m. 3. This approval daes not relieVe the applicant orowner ofany requirement ofany other g(>vernmental agency. 

### 4. It shall be unlawful for Holnam, Inc. to cause or allow the emission ofany air contamill1lllt from the kiln main exhaust stack that is

greaterthan 12% opacity for a 

### I-hour average in accordance with the provisions ofArticle 

### 12 ofRegulation 

### I. 

### 5. Holnam, Inc. 

### shall submit annual source test reports tothe Agency to verify this 1-hour opacitY standard demonstrates continuous

compliance with Section 9.09(a) ofRegulation I. · 

### 6. This Order ofApproval does not relieve Holnam, Inc. from the requirements ofRegulation I, Section 9.03. 7. Holnsm shall follow the procedures in Assurance ofDiscontinuaJlCO Agreement dated July 13, 1993 (which shell terminate onJune 30, 1995), snd WAC 173-400-107 for opacity and particulate violations caused by excess emissions.

# ~·~Hcdc~ DluCK L. AUSTIN

# Ri. JAY

# M~G

# & Reviewing Engineer • ' Reviewing Engineer 

## MEJ

Fonn 

### 50--118, (1/91) 

# L_ ARTHURDAVIDSON

### ~- Air Pollution Control Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                            <C>               <C>              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                     3-MOS             6-MOS             YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              DEC-31-1999       DEC-31-1999      DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                   JUN-30-2000       JUN-30-2000      DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                          1,008,505         1,008,505        1,179,729
<SECURITIES>                            0                 0                0
<RECEIVABLES>                     103,887           103,887          219,098
<ALLOWANCES>                            0                 0                0
<INVENTORY>                             0                 0                0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                8,562,896         8,562,896        7,610,334
<PP&E>                                  0                 0                0
<DEPRECIATION>                          0                 0                0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  9,675,288         9,675,288        9,009,161
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>              31,634            31,634          200,934
<BONDS>                                 0                 0                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0                 0                0
<PREFERRED>                             0                 0                0
<COMMON>                                0                 0                0
<OTHER-SE>                      9,643,654         9,643,654        8,808,227
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    9,675,288         9,675,288        9,009,161
<SALES>                                 0                 0                0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                   44,829            59,586                0
<CGS>                                   0                 0                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           0                 0                0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                   33,780            71,404                0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0                 0                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      0                 0                0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         0                 0                0
<INCOME-TAX>                            0                 0                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>               388,998           847,245                0
<DISCONTINUED>                          0                 0                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0                 0                0
<CHANGES>                               0                 0                0
<NET-INCOME>                      400,047           835,427                0
<EPS-BASIC>                           0                 0                0
<EPS-DILUTED>                           0                 0                0


</TABLE>
Page 1 of 3

Disposition Comments

Docket No: FAA-2010-0517 These comments are in

Directorate ID: 2009-SW-73-AD response to an SNPRM

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

Next Step: FRAN SNPRM

 No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received – If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required.

 Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes, 

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don’t agree because 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD:
Page 2 of 3

If NO, we don’t agree because 

For additional issues, double-click here
Page 3 of 3

Signature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

ASE Printed Name: Date

Branch Manager Date
| (logo) WELLS  FARGO | **Commercial  Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084,  8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334

 

  |
|---------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

 

Reference is hereby made to that certain Poolingand Servicing Agreement dated as of March 1, 2016, by and among WELLS FARGOCOMMERCIAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES, INC., as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONALASSOCIATION, as General Master Servicer, , RIALTO CAPITAL ADVISORS, LLC asGeneral Special Servicer, NATIONAL COOPERATIVE BANK, N.A., as NCB MasterServicer and as NCB Special Servicer, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,as Certificate Administrator, WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, asTrustee and PARK BRIDGE LENDER SERVICES LLC, as Operating Advisor and as AssetRepresentations Reviewer, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-ThroughCertificates Series 2016-C33 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized termsused herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 11.09 of thisAgreement, I, Leslie Hayton, Managing Director of Commercial Mortgage Servicesdo hereby certify that:

 

1.       Areview of the activities of the General Master Servicer during the period fromJanuary 1, 2018 through December 31, 2018 (the “Reporting Period”), and of itsperformance per the Agreement during such period has been made under mysupervision, and

 

2.       To thebest of my knowledge, based on such review, the General Master Servicer hasfulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement in all material respectsthroughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned hasexecuted this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2019.

 

 

/s/Leslie Hayton

LeslieHayton

ManagingDirector

WellsFargo Bank

 

 

| Wells  Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together  we’ll go far |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
Case Ho. 14,649.

#### UNITED STATES v. BRIONES.

[Hoff. Land Cas. 111.] 1

District Court, N. D. California.

Dec. Term, 1855.

Mexican Land Grant — Vaiuditv op Grant.

The validity of this claim undoubted.

Claim [by Juana Briones] for one square league of land in Santa Clara county [the Rancho La Purísima Concepcion], confirmed by the board, and appealed by the United States.

S. W. Inge, U. S. Atty

Halleck, Peachy & Billings, for appellee.

HOFFMAN, District Judge.

.The board of commissioners, in their opinion in this case, observe that it presents no point of doubt or difficulty. The genuineness of the original grant is fully established. The grantees are shown to have been in the possession and occupation of the land for several years prior to their grant, and continued to reside on it until 1844, when, with the permission of the governor, it was sold to the present claimant. The latter has resided on it up to the time of the filing of her petition.

In a note appended to the original grant, the boundaries are indicated with much precision; and the grant declares the quantity of land granted to be one square league. No objection was made to this claim on behalf of the United States, and we think it should iie confirmed to the appellee.

A decree to that effect will therefore be entered.
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v VICTOR IACONO, Private First Class, U. S. Marine Corps, Appellant

19 USCMA 490, 42 CMR 92

No. 22,905

June 5, 1970

*Captain Jeffery W. Maurer,*USMC, was on the pleadings for Appellant, Accused.

*Lieutenant Colonel Charles*/. *Keever,*USMC, was on the pleadings for Appellee, United States.

Opinion of the Court

l) \rden, Judge:

The appellant stands convicted of wrongfully selling twelve tablets containing LSD on June 4,1969. For conviction of an offense committed before August 1, 1969, use of evidence reflecting Article 15 disciplinary action is inadmissible for consideration during sentencing. United States v Johnson, 19 USCMA 464, 42 CMR 66 (1970). Evidence showing an unauthorized absence from his appointed place of duty and of wrongful possession of another’s identification card and liberty pass could have had an impact on the sentence given this appellant for the offense charged. Accordingly, the decision of the Court of Military Review is reversed as to sentence. The record of trial is returned to the Judge Advocate General of the Navy for submission to the Court of Military Review for reconsideration of the sentence.

Chief Judge Quinn concurs.

Ferguson, Judge

(concurring in the result) :

I concur in the result for the reasons set forth in my separate opinion in United States v Johnson, 19 USCMA 464, 42 CMR 66 (1970).
NOTE: Pursuant to Fed. Cir. R. 47.6, this disposition 

is not citable as precedent. It is a public record. 

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 

06-3024 

GERMAN M. QUIAMBAO, 

 Petitioner, 

v. 

 OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, 

Respondent. 

 ___________________________ 

 DECIDED: April 6, 2006 

 ___________________________ 

Before SCHALL, DYK, and PROST, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM. 

German M. Quiambao (“Quiambao”) appeals the final decision of the Merit 

Systems Protection Board (the “Board”) denying his request for retirement benefits 

under the Civil Service Retirement System (“CSRS”). We affirm. 

BACKGROUND 

Quiambao was employed as a blacksmith by the Department of the Navy at 

Subic Bay in the Philippines beginning on December 8, 1965. On May 16, 1966, after 

the one-year probationary period, his appointment was converted to an indefinite 

appointment. Quiambao retired on June 26, 1987, and requested CSRS retirement 

benefits on January 10, 1989. OPM denied the request on August 17, 1989. Though 

his appeal to the Board was not filed until October 14, 2004, the Board excused the 

late-filing because OPM could not prove that Quiambao received the August 17, 1989 
decision. On the merits, the Board denied Quiambao’s claim because his service in an

Indefinite Excepted Appointment did not satisfy the statutory requirements for CSRS 

benefits. The Board’s decision became final on August 19, 2005, and Quiambao timely 

appealed. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1295(a)(9). 

DISCUSSION 

We must affirm the Board’s decision unless it was arbitrary, capricious, an abuse 

of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law; obtained without procedures 

required by law, rule or regulation; or unsupported by substantial evidence. 5 U.S.C.

§ 7703(c) (2000); Yates v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd., 145 F.3d 1480, 1483 (Fed. Cir. 1998). 

To qualify for CSRS retirement benefits, Quiambao must show that he satisfies

the requirements of 5 U.S.C. § 8333 and that he is not excluded under any provision

limiting CSRS coverage. 5 U.S.C. § 8333 (2000); 5 U.S.C. § 8347(g) (2000); Rosete v.

Office of Pers. Mgmt., 48 F.3d 514, 516 (Fed. Cir. 1995). While Quiambao was an

employee of the federal government, we have held repeatedly that employees serving 

in indefinite appointments made after January 23, 1955, are expressly excluded from

CSRS coverage under 5 C.F.R. § 831.201(a)(13). Casilang v. Office of Pers. Mgmt., 

248 F.3d 1381, 1383 (Fed. Cir. 2001); Rosete, 48 F.3d at 516-17. The Board’s decision 

is affirmed. 

No costs. 

06-3024 2
pennsylvania 

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

SECRETARY 

January 25, 2012 

Mr. Shawn M. Garvin 

Regional Administrator 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region III 

1650 Arch Street (Mail Code: 3RAOO) 

Philadelphia, P A 19103-2029 

Dear Mr. Garvin: 

In accordance with Section II O(a) of the Clean Air Act, enclosed for your approval is a revision 

to Pennsylvania's State Implementation Plan (SIP) pertaining to changes to the Allegheny 

County Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) plan for the 8-hour ozone National 

Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS), previously submitted to EPA as a SIP revision on 

May 5, 2009, and identified as revision 60 for the Allegheny County Health Department's 

(ACHD) internal tracking. This SIP revisipn is a December 15,2011, letter from 

James E. Thompson, ACHD, to Diana Esher, Director of the Air Protection Division, requesting 

changes to the May 2009 RACT plan to remove references to the Clean Air Interstate Rule 

(CAIR) and the Nitrogen Oxides (NOx) SIP Call. The letter also certifies that the "case-by-case 

evaluations" of21 volatile organic compound (VOC) and NOx RACT sources within Allegheny 

County did not reference or rely on CAIR or reference the NOx SIP Call to complete either the 

Ozone !-Hour RACT Plan or the Ozone 8-Hour RACT Plan. This SIP revision is identified as 

revision 70B for the ACHD's internal tracking. 

The ACHD is a local health agency organized under Local Health Administration Law, 

Act 315 of August 24, 1951, P.L. 1304, as amended, whose powers and duties include the 

enforcement of laws relating to public health within Allegheny County. The ACHD has an air 

pollution control program that has been approved by the Department of Environmental 

Protection in accordance with Section 12 of the Pennsylvania Air Pollution Control Act, 

35 P.S. § 4012. 

I have enclosed a hard copy and a compact disk of the SIP submittal. The SIP submittal consists 

of an introductory explanation, the letter from ACHD and documentation of the public 

participation process. No comments were received during the public comment period. I certify 

that the electronic files are exact duplicates of the hard copies. 

Rachel Carson State Office Building I P.O. Box 2063 I Harrisburg, PA 17105-2063 

w 

717.787.2814 Printed on Recycled Paper ~(9 www.depweb.state.pa.us 
Mr. Shawn M. Garvin - 2- January 25,2012 

Thank you for your attention to this matter. Should you have any questions concerning this SIP 

revision, please contact Joyce E. Epps, Director of the Bureau of Air Quality, by e-mail at 

jeepps@pa.gov or by telephone at 717.787.9702. You may also contact James E. Thompson, 

Manager of the Air Quality Program for the ACHD, by e-mail at jthompson@achd.net or by 

telephone at 412.578.8103. 

Michael L. Krancer 

Secretary 

Enclosures 

cc: Joyce Epps 

James Thompson, ACHD 

Diana Esher, EPA Region III