alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2017293EN.01002902.xml

| 4.9.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 293/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.9.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 293/29

---

Judgment of the General Court of 20 July 2017 — Spain v Commission

(Case T-143/15) (1)

1

((EAGF and EAFRD - Expenditure excluded from financing - Expenditure incurred by Spain - Decoupled direct aid in the claim years 2008 and 2009 - Failings in the control system - Assessment of control samples - Burden of proof - Aid for rural development in the Autonomous Community of Castilla y León in the claim years 2009 and 2010 - On-the-spot checks - Key controls - Proportionality))

(2017/C 293/33)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Kingdom of Spain (represented by: M. Sampol Pucurull and M.J. García-Valdecasas Dorrego, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: D. Triantafyllou and I. Galindo Martín, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU for partial annulment of Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/103 of 16 January 2015 excluding from European Union financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) (OJ 2015 L 16, p. 33).

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The General Court:

| 1. | Annuls Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/103 of 16 January 2015 excluding from European Union financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) in so far as it concerns the financial correction imposed on the Kingdom of Spain following inquiry AA/2009/007/ES for the claim year 2009; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/103 of 16 January 2015 excluding from European Union financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) in so far as it concerns the financial correction imposed on the Kingdom of Spain following inquiry AA/2009/007/ES for the claim year 2009;

| 2. | Dismisses the action as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

| 3. | Orders each party to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders each party to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 178, 1.6.2015.

1

---
# C_2018005EN.01002701.xml

| 8.1.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 5/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.1.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 5/27

---

Judgment of the General Court of 16 November 2017 — European Dynamics Luxembourg and Others v EBA

(Case T-229/15) (1)

1

((Public service contracts - Tendering procedure - Provision of interim staff for IT services - Rejection of a tenderer’s bid - Obligation to state reasons - Manifest error of assessment))

(2018/C 005/36)

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Parties

Applicants: European Dynamics Luxembourg SA (Luxembourg, Luxembourg), Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE (Athens, Greece) and European Dynamics Belgium SA (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: I. Ampazis, M. Sfyri, C.-N. Dede and D. Papadopoulou, then M. Sfyri, C.-N. Dede and D. Papadopoulou, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Banking Authority (EBA) (represented by: J. Overett Somnier, J. Mifsud and S. Giordano, acting as Agents, assisted by H.-G. Kamann and A. Dritsa, lawyers)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

First, an action under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of the decision of the EBA of 2 March 2015 rejecting the applicants’ tender submitted in response to the restricted tendering procedure EBA/2014/06/OPS/SER/RT with respect to Lot 1, titled ‘Supply of interim staff: Supply of interim staff for Information Technology’ and, second, an action under Article 268 TFEU seeking compensation for harm that the applicants allegedly suffered following that decision as a result of the loss of opportunity to be ranked in first place in the cascade the contract award procedure at issue, amounting to EUR 300 000, together with interest

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders European Dynamics Luxembourg SA, Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE and European Dynamics Belgium SA to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders European Dynamics Luxembourg SA, Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE and European Dynamics Belgium SA to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 262, 10.8.2015

1

---
No. 56644.

protest 167093-K (Milwaukee).

#### Holeproof Hosiery Co. *v.*United States,

*474Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel that the relative value of the rag waste was 36 cents per pound, and that all of the statutory requirements and other conditions precedent for the allowance of drawback were complied with, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary information extracted from Union Carbide
Corporation's Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended June 30, 1999, and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<CIK> 0000100790
<NAME> UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                              41
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     1075
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        599
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  1962
<PP&E>                                            8714
<DEPRECIATION>                                    4363
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    7465
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             1349
<BONDS>                                           2044
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           157
<OTHER-SE>                                        2297
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      7465
<SALES>                                           2820
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  2820
<CGS>                                             2137
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     2137
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   275<F1>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  66
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    258
<INCOME-TAX>                                        66
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                140
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                           20
<NET-INCOME>                                       120
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.90
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.88
<FN>
<F1>Other expenses are equal to research and development of 76 and depreciation and
amortization of 199.
</FN>


</TABLE>
To:  U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

RE:  Public Comment - EPA Air Quality Hearing, Dock et ID EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0505

I live in the small unincorporated community of Bat tlement Mesa in Garfield County Colorado, and we are surrounded by hundreds of nearby natural gas we lls with hundreds more being proposed.  Our once clean mountain air has degraded significantly due to the fact that Garfield County is now the largest natural gas producing county in Colorado.

Residents of our community have been overcome at ti mes by noxious fumes resulting from the gas drilling and hydraulic fracturing operations going on around us.  We are a very vulnerable population, with a large number of elderly residents and famili es with young children living here. Many residents have experienced nausea, dizziness, headaches, and respiratory problems from exposure to the noxious fumes and odors washing over our community. Some residents have also developed pneumonia and asthma that they believe are related to exposure to toxic emissions from oil and gas operations.

The oil and gas industry claims to use best managem ent practices and green completions, but the experiences of our community demonstrate that their operations still pose a significant threat to the public health.

The EPA needs to enact stricter air quality regulat ions and do more to protect the environment and public health from the adverse effects of this haza rdous industry.

Ron Galterio 12 Poppy Court Battlement Mesa, CO 81635

Public Comment - Docket ID EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0505 Ron Galterio

to: Nick Parsons 08/02/2010 02:17 AM Show Details Page 1 of 1

8/9/2010 file://C:\Documents and Settings\nparsons\Local Set tings\Temp\notesFCBCEE\~web8109.h

...
Exhibit
13.1   Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  In
connection with the Annual Report of Integrated Media Technology Limited (the “Company”) on Form 20 for the period
ended December 31, 2017 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Dr. Herbert Ying Chiu
LEE, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter
63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:  1.
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of
    1934; and2.
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
    operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.  This
Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, “filed” with the Securities and Exchange Commission.    Date:
March 31, 2018   /S/
Herbert Ying Chiu LEE Dr.
Herbert Ying Chiu LEE Director
and Chief Executive Officer
# C_2015406EN.01004402.xml

| 7.12.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 406/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.12.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 406/44

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Single Judge) of 29 October 2015 — Xenakis v Commission

(Case F-52/15) (1)

((Civil Service - Officials - Automatic retirement - Retirement age - Request to extend the period of employment - Second paragraph of Article 52 of the Staff Regulations - Refusal to extend the period of employment - Interest of the service))

(2015/C 406/46)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Yannis Xenakis (Woluwe-Saint-Pierre, Belgium) (represented by: S. Rodrigues and A. Blot, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and C. Ehrbar, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of the Commission’s decision rejecting the application to extend the applicant’s service and, accordingly, confirming his automatic retirement on 31 October 2014 and application for damages in respect of the material harm allegedly suffered and the symbolic sum of EUR 1 in respect of the non-material harm alleged.

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Mr Xenakis to bear his own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Xenakis to bear his own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission.

---

(1)  
  OJ C 190, 8.6.2015, p. 38.

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

WESTERN DISTRICT 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

Respondent 

v. 

RICARDO ALPHONSO PEOPLES, 

Petitioner 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 118 WAL 2015 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Unpublished Memorandum and 

Order of the Superior Court at No. 424 

WDA 2014 exited December 19, 2014, 

affirming the Order of the Allegheny 

County Court of Common Pleas at No. 

CP-02-CR-0008708-1997 exited 

January 17, 2014 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

 AND NOW, this 17th day of February, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

is GRANTED on the issue of whether Petitioner’s sentence violates the prohibition 

against mandatory life sentences for juvenile offenders announced by the Supreme 

Court of the United States in Miller v. Alabama, 567 U.S. ___, 132 S. Ct. 2455 (2012). 

As a result of the recent holding by that Court that Miller must be applied retroactively 

by the States, see Montgomery v. Louisiana, 2016 WL 280758 (U.S. Jan. 25, 2016), the 

Superior Court’s order is VACATED, and the case is REMANDED for further 

proceedings consistent with Montgomery. 

To the extent necessary, leave is to be granted to amend the post-conviction 

petition to assert the jurisdictional provision of the Post Conviction Relief Act extending 

to the recognition of constitutional rights by the Supreme Court of the United States 

which it deems to be retroactive. See 42 Pa.C.S. §9545(b)(1)(iii). 

Mr. Justice Eakin did not participate in the decision of this matter
| (logo) WELLS

           FARGO | **Commercial  Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084,  8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334

 

  |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

# **ANNUALSTATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE**

 

 

Reference is hereby made tothat certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of April 1, 2016, by andamong DEUTSCHE MORTGAGE & ASSET RECEIVING CORPORATION, as Depositor, WELLSFARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, MIDLAND LOAN SERVICES, ADIVISION OF PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Special Servicer, WILMINGTONTRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONALASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator, Paying Agent and Custodian and PARKBRIDGE LENDER SERVICES LLC, as Operating Advisor and Asset RepresentationsReviewer with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series2016-C1 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein nototherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement. 

 

Pursuant to Section 10.11 ofthis Agreement, I, Leslie Hayton, Managing Director of Commercial MortgageServices do hereby certify that: 

 

1.            A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period fromJanuary 1, 2018 through December 31, 2018 (the “Reporting Period”), and of itsperformance per the Agreement during such period has been made under mysupervision, and 

 

2.           To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer hasfulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respectsthroughout the Reporting Period. 

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, theundersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day ofFebruary 2019. 

 

 

/s/ LeslieHayton

LeslieHayton 

Managing Director

WellsFargo Bank

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank,  N.A. | (logo) Together  we’ll go far |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM 
UNITED AIR LINES, INC.'S STATEMENT OF CONSOLIDATED OPERATIONS FOR 
THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1997 AND CONDENSED STATEMENT OF 
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL POSITION AS OF JUNE 30, 1997 AND IS 
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000,000
       
<S>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                      JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                        JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                             6-MOS
<CASH>                                                       65
<SECURITIES>                                                468
<RECEIVABLES>                                             1,164
<ALLOWANCES>                                                  0
<INVENTORY>                                                 350
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                          2,565
<PP&E>                                                   15,749
<DEPRECIATION>                                            6,154
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           14,190
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                     5,417
<BONDS>                                                   2,993
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                         0
<PREFERRED>                                                   0
<COMMON>                                                      0
<OTHER-SE>                                                2,047
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                             14,190
<SALES>                                                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                          8,481
<CGS>                                                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                             7,888
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                          142
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                             546
<INCOME-TAX>                                                204
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                         342
<DISCONTINUED>                                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                               0
<CHANGES>                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                                342
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                 0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                 0
                                                              

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32b

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Twin Disc, Incorporated (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ending March 30, 2007,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as of the date hereof (the Report), I, Christopher J. Eperjesy, Vice President  Finance, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and                   
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|   

/s/ CHRISTOPHER J. EPERJESYChristopher J. EperjesyVice President  Finance, ChiefFinancial Officer and Secretary

May 9, 2007

---
```

[110th Congress Public Law 121]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ121.110]

[[Page 121 STAT. 1349]]

Public Law 110-121
110th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
 701 Loyola Avenue in New Orleans, Louisiana, as the ``Louisiana Armed 
Services Veterans Post Office''. <<NOTE: Nov. 30, 2007 -  [H.R. 2089]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. LOUISIANA ARMED SERVICES VETERANS POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 701 Loyola Avenue in New Orleans, Louisiana, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Louisiana Armed Services Veterans Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Louisiana 
Armed Services Veterans Post Office''.

    Approved November 30, 2007.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 2089:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 153 (2007):
            Oct. 15, considered and passed House.
            Nov. 16, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
# C_2017369EN.01000901.xml

| 30.10.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 369/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.10.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 369/9

---

Judgment of the General Court of 15 September 2017 — Commission v FE

(Case T-734/15 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - Civil Service - Officials - Open competition - Inclusion on the reserve list - Decision of the appointing authority not to recruit a successful candidate - Respective powers of the selection board and of the appointing authority - Conditions of admission to the competition - Minimum duration of professional experience - Rules for calculation - Loss of a chance of recruitment - Claim for damages))

(2017/C 369/11)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Appellant: European Commission (represented by: F. Simonetti and G. Gattinara, acting as Agents)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: FE (represented by: L. Levi and A. Blot, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union (First Chamber) of 6 October 2015, FE v Commission (F-119/14, EU:F:2015:116), seeking to have that judgment set aside.

FE

Commission

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Sets aside points 1, 2 and 4 of the operative part of the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union (First Chamber) of 6 October 2015, FE v Commission (F-119/14); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Sets aside points 1, 2 and 4 of the operative part of the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union (First Chamber) of 6 October 2015, FE v Commission (F-119/14);

| 2. | Dismisses the action brought by FE before the Civil Service Tribunal in Case F-119/14; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the action brought by FE before the Civil Service Tribunal in Case F-119/14;

| 3. | Orders each party to bear its own costs relating to the appeal proceedings; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders each party to bear its own costs relating to the appeal proceedings;

| 4. | Orders FE to pay the costs of the proceedings before the Civil Service Tribunal, including the costs incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders FE to pay the costs of the proceedings before the Civil Service Tribunal, including the costs incurred by the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 68, 22.2.2016.

1

---