alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 278 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 278

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 6, 2008

      Received and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Supporting Taiwan's fourth direct and democratic presidential elections 
                             in March 2008.

Whereas the United States and Taiwan share common ideals and a clear vision for 
        the 21st century, where freedom and democracy are the foundations for 
        peace, prosperity, and progress;
Whereas Taiwan has dramatically improved its record on human rights and 
        routinely holds free and fair elections in a multiparty system, as 
        evidenced by

              

 Taiwan's first democratic presidential election in 1996, second in 2000, 
and third in 2004;

Whereas the democratic and open presidential elections in 2000 mark the first 
        transfer of power from one party to another in Taiwan's history;
Whereas Taiwan has demonstrated its unequivocal support for human rights and a 
        commitment to the democratic ideals of freedom of speech, freedom of the 
        press, rule of law, and free and fair elections routinely held in a 
        multiparty system;
Whereas Taiwan is one of the strongest democratic allies of the United States in 
        the Asia-Pacific region;
Whereas it is United States policy to support and strengthen democracy around 
        the world;
Whereas, with its stable democratic system and impressive economic prowess, 
        Taiwan stands apart from many equally young democracies whose freedom 
        and liberty have been severely challenged; and
Whereas the United States Congress has organized congressional delegations to 
        witness the electoral process in thriving democracies, including 
        elections in Taiwan: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of the Congress that--
            (1) the United States Government should reaffirm its 
        unwavering commitment to Taiwan's democracy and security; and
            (2) international delegations should be encouraged to visit 
        Taiwan for the purpose of witnessing the presidential elections 
        in March 2008.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 5, 2008.

            Attest:

                                            LORRAINE C. MILLER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND INCOME STATEMENT OF UGI UTILITIES, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES AS OF AND FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1998 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN
UGI UTILITIES' QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30,
1998.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000100548
<NAME> UGI UTILITIES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           3,038
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   42,068
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,419
<INVENTORY>                                     20,434
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                78,071
<PP&E>                                         787,543
<DEPRECIATION>                                 251,214
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 689,695
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          135,449
<BONDS>                                        187,166
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           20,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        60,259
<OTHER-SE>                                     153,608
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   689,695
<SALES>                                        362,139
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               362,139
<CGS>                                          188,267
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  188,267
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 3,589
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,996
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 61,301
<INCOME-TAX>                                    23,202
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             36,327
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    36,327
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0<F1>
<FN>
<F1>There are no publicly held shares outstanding.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
DISMISS and Opinion Filed December 15, 2021 

# S

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-21-00386-CV ALYAH KECK, Appellant V. ROBERT LESLIE, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-20-02019-D MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Burns, Justi ce Goldstein, and Justice Smith Opinion by Chief Justice Burns Appellant’s brief in this case is over due. By postcard dated November 9, 2021, we notified appellant th e time for filing her brief ha d expired. We directed appellant to file a brief and an extension motion with in ten days. We cautioned appellant that failure to file her brief by that time might re sult in the dismissal of this appeal without further notice. To date, appellant has not file d a brief, filed an extension motion, nor otherw ise corresponded with the Court regarding the status of this appeal. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1); 42.3(b), (c).–2– 210386F.P05 /Robert D. Bu r ns, III / ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE–3– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT ALYAH KECK, Appellant

No. 05-21-00386-CV V. ROBERT LESLIE, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-20-02019- D. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Burns. Justices Goldstein and Smith participating. In accordance with this Court’s opi nion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED

. Judgment entered this 15th day of December 2021.
EXHIBIT 32.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Trinity Learning Corporation (the "Company")
Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Douglas D. Cole, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date: February 11, 2005

                                                /S/ DOUGLAS D. COLE
                                                -------------------
                                                Douglas D. Cole
                                                Chief Executive Officer



     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
     been provided to Trinity Learning Corporation and will be retained by it
     and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
     request.
# C_2015429EN.01002602.xml

| 21.12.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 429/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.12.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 429/26

---

Order of the General Court of 22 October 2015 — Macchia v Commission

(Case T-80/15 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - Civil Service - Temporary staff - Fixed-term contract - Decision not to renew - Interest of the service - Duty of care - Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded))

(2015/C 429/34)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Luigi Macchia (Rome, Italy) (represented by: S. Rodrigues and A. Blot, lawyers)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and G. Gattinara, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal lodged against the order of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 12 December 2014 in Macchia v Commission, F-63/11 RENV, ECR-SC, EU:F:2014:272, seeking to have that order set aside.

Macchia

Commission

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

| 2. | Mr Luigi Macchia shall bear his own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission in the present instance. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Mr Luigi Macchia shall bear his own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission in the present instance.

---

(1)  OJ C 127, 20.4.2015.

1

---
**THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS**

**Post Office Box 12248**

**Austin, Texas 78711**

**(512) 463-1312**

April 10, 2007

Mr. Frederick F. Hoelke

Law Offices of Frederick F. Hoelke

26545 IH10 West Ste 100

Boerne, TX 78006

Mr. David Michael Scott

Zimmerman, Axelrad, Meyer, Stern & Wise, P.C.

3040 Post Oak Blvd, 13th Floor

Houston, TX 77056-6560

Mr. Robert L. Harris

Shannon, Gracey, Ratliff & Miller, L.L.P.

500 North Akard Street, Suite 2500

Dallas, TX 75201

RE:Case Number:  06-1010

Court of Appeals Number:  

Trial Court Number:  

Style:IN RE  STEVEN E. LOOPER, INDIVIDUALLY, ET AL.

Dear Counsel:

The Multidistrict Litigation Panel issued the enclosed opinion in the above-referenced case.

Sincerely,

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk

by Claudia Jenks, Chief Deputy Clerk

Case No. 06-1010Page 1
**
**Exhibit 31.4**

**Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a)**

**of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934**

I, Andrew B. Coxhead, certify that: 

 
1.
I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form10-K of LSC Communications, Inc.; and 

 
2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. 

 
Date: April 12, 2019                         /s/    ANDREW B.COXHEAD                       **Andrew B. Coxhead**   **Chief Financial Officer****
**EXHIBIT 23**

**Analysis, Research & PlanningCorporation’s Consent**

 

## ** **

 

 

Union Carbide Corporation:

 

 

Analysis, Research & Planning Corporation (“ARPC”) hereby consentsto the use of ARPC’s name and the reference to ARPC’s reports appearing in thisQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Union Carbide Corporation for the quarterended September 30, 2007.

 

 

 

 

 

 
| /s/ B. THOMAS FLORENCE                        |   |
|-----------------------------------------------|--------|
| B. Thomas Florence                            |   |
| President                                     |   |
| Analysis, Research & Planning Corporation |   |
| October 26, 2007                              |   |

 

23

----
Exhibit 32.2
 
 
 
 Certification of CFO Pursuant to
 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
 As Adopted Pursuant to
 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of U.S. Energy Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Robert Scott Lorimer, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:
 
 (1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 
 
 
 
 /s/  Robert Scott LorimerRobert Scott Lorimer,Chief Financial OfficerNovember 5, 2010
 
 
 This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
 
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to U.S. Energy Corp. and will be retained by U.S. Energy Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Before the Third Division,

February 16, 1942

No. 46954.

#### Protest 10249-K of W. R. Zanes & Co. (Galveston).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

Several witnesses were called by tha plaintiff but no evidence was produced to establish that the number of pieces or lengths of pipe imported were other or different from those entered. On the meager record the court found that the plaintiff failed to sustain his burden of proof. The protest was therefore overruled.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                        <C>                   <C>                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>             3-MOS                9-MOS                 YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>      DEC-31-1997          DEC-31-1997          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>           SEP-30-1997          SEP-30-1997          DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                          0              450,022              271,692
<SECURITIES>                    0                    0                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   0                    0                    0
<ALLOWANCES>                    0                    0                    0
<INVENTORY>                     0                    0                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                0            4,815,337            3,741,448
<PP&E>                          0                    0                    0
<DEPRECIATION>                  0                    0                    0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  0            4,815,337            3,741,448
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           0               30,021               92,700
<BONDS>                         0                    0                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0                    0                    0
<PREFERRED>                     0                    0                    0
<COMMON>                        0                    0                    0
<OTHER-SE>                      0            4,785,316            3,648,748
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    0            4,815,337            3,741,448
<SALES>                         0                    0                    0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>            4,165               12,332                    0
<CGS>                           0                    0                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   0                    0                    0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>           36,822               89,052                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0                    0                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              0                    0                    0
<INCOME-PRETAX>           126,545            1,136,568                    0
<INCOME-TAX>              126,545            1,136,568                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             0                    0                    0
<DISCONTINUED>                  0                    0                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0                    0                    0
<CHANGES>                       0                    0                    0
<NET-INCOME>              126,545            1,136,568                    0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                   0                    0                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                   0                    0                    0
        

</TABLE>
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Employment Outlook in Printing Occupations

              																	United States. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 						*Employment Outlook in Printing Occupations : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 1126*,												Washington: 								U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 										1953,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/4452,			accessed on September 25, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.23

                                 PROMISSORY NOTE

$152,500

                                                          Minneapolis, Minnesota
                                                                February 9, 2000

         FOR VALUE RECEIVED, FOUNDERS FOOD & FIRKINS LTD., a Minnesota
corporation ("FOUNDERS"), promises to pay to the order of NEW BRIGHTON
VENTURES, INC., a Minnesota corporation ("NBVI"), at its office c/o Champps
of New Brighton, 2397 Palmer Drive, New Brighton, Minnesota 55112, the sum of
ONE HUNDRED FIFTY-TWO THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED AND 00/100 DOLLARS ($152,500.00),
together with interest on the unpaid principal balance from the date of the
advance at a fixed rate per annum of eight percent (8%) (computed on the
basis of actual days elapsed in a year of 360 days).

         All unpaid accrued interest together with the principal outstanding
hereon shall be due and payable in full within 180 days following the date
referenced above.

         This Note is issued to fund the balance of the liquor license
purchase price as provided in the Agreement by and between CNJ Distributing
Corp., a Montana corporation, and FOUNDERS dated December 20, 1999, and the
Amendment to License Purchase Agreement by and between CNJ Distributing
Corp., a Montana corporation and FOUNDERS dated January 18, 2000.

         This Note may be prepaid at any time in whole or in part without
premium or penalty. Payments on this Note shall first be applied to accrued
interest and thereafter in reduction of principal.

         FOUNDERS hereby waives demand, presentment for payment, notice of
nonpayment, protest and notice of protest hereon, agrees that when or at any
time after this Note becomes due, the holder hereof may, without notice,
offset or charge this Note against any bank account or other account
maintained by FOUNDERS with the holder hereof, and agrees to pay, in the
event of default hereon, all costs of collection, including reasonable
attorneys' fees, whether or not suit is commenced.

         The undersigned and each endorser, guarantor and surety hereof
hereby waives presentment and demand for payment, notice of dishonor, protest
and notice of protest. The undersigned agrees to pay all reasonable costs of
collection (including reasonable attorney's fees) incurred by the holder
hereof in enforcing this Note. This Note shall be governed by the laws of
Minnesota.

                                     FOUNDERS FOOD & FIRKINS LTD.

                                     /S/ STEVEN J. WAGENHEIM
                                     -------------------------------------------
                                     By: Steven J. Wagenheim
                                     Its: President and Chief Executive Officer
#### ANSHAN IRON & STEEL COMPANY, LTD., New Iron Steel Company, Ltd., Angang Group International Trade Corporation, Benxi Iron & Steel Company, Ltd., Benxi Steel Plate Company, Ltd., and Benxi Iron & Steel Group International Economic and Trade Company, Ltd., Plaintiffs-Appellees, and Shanghai Baosteel Group Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellant, and United States Steel Corporation, Defendant-Appellant, and Weirton Steel Corporation, Steel Dynamics, Inc., Ipsco Steel Inc. and Gallatin Steel Company, Defendants-Appellees, and Nucor Corporation, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 05-1401, 05-1403.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Aug. 16, 2005.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the United States and United Steel Corp.’s joint unopposed motion to voluntarily dismiss their appeals,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The motion to dismiss is granted.

*349(2) All sides shall bear their own costs.

(3) All remaining motions are moot.