alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2016106EN.01005002.xml

| 21.3.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 106/50 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.3.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 106/50

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 5 February 2016 — Fedtke v EESC

(Case F-107/15) (1)

1

((Civil Service - Officials - Automatic retirement - Retirement age - Application to remain in service beyond the age limit - Second paragraph of Article 52 of the Staff Regulations - Interest of the service - Article 82 of the Rules of Procedure - Absolute bar to proceeding - Irregularity of the pre-litigation procedure))

(2016/C 106/61)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Ingrid Fedtke (Wezembeek-Oppen, Belgium) (represented by: M.-A. Lucas, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Economic and Social Committee (represented by: K. Gambino, A. Carvajal, L. Camerena Januzec and X. Chamodraka, acting as Agents, and B. Wägenbaur, lawyer)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of the decision placing the applicant in retirement with effect from 31 December 2014 and the decision rejecting her application for an extension of her service.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

| 2. | Ms Fedtke shall bear her own costs and shall pay the costs incurred by the European Economic and Social Committee. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Ms Fedtke shall bear her own costs and shall pay the costs incurred by the European Economic and Social Committee.

---

(1)  OJ C 320, 28.9.2015, p. 53.

1

---
No. 54884.

#### Kaufman & Vinson Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 160157-K (A), etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Rao, J.

The protests were dismissed.
U.S.Department of

Transportation Office of the Secretary OfTransportation 1200 New Jersey Ave
.. S.E. Washington, DC 20590



## HAY Z3

## 2014
The Honorable Dan Benishek U.S. House ofRepresentatives Washington, DC 20515 Dear Congressman Benishek: Thank you for your letter regarding Essential Air Service (EAS) at Gogebic-Iron County Airport (lWD) serving the Ironwood area inthe Upper Peninsula. Inthe letter, you stated your concern that as ofFebruary 1,2014, the airport would lose its sole commercial carrier, Great Lakes Aviation, Ltd. (Great Lakes), when it suspended operations. As you may be aware, Great Lakes suffered severe operational problems inthe first quarter of 2014 that were caused by alack ofpilots due inpart to recent statutory and regulatory changes involving pilot training requirements and the carrier's implementation ofthe changes. Prior to this, in December 2013, the Department solicited proposals fornew service at Ironwood, as Great Lakes' contract was setto expire on May 31, 2014. Inresponse to that request for proposals, the Department received proposals from two air carriers, Great Lakes and Multi-Aero, Inc. d/b/a Air Choice One (Air Choice One). In early February, the Department solicited the community's feedback on the proposals, and,in response, the Gogebic-Iron County Airport Board recommended Air Choice One's option that provided 18round trips per week to Chicago O'Hare International Airport (ORD). On April 18,2014, the Department issued an Order selecting Air Choice One to provide the proposed service that was recommended by the community. Iam pleased to tell you that last week, Air Choice One announced details ofits fare structure and flight schedule, which begins July 7, 2014. I, along with Michael Gormas ofmy team, provided periodic updates onthe situation to your offices via email and telephone. The Department appreciates Ironwood's active involvement inthe carrier-selection process and we wish the community and Air Choice One much success.-2-

Acopy ofthis letter will beplaced in Ironwood's docket (DOT-OST-1996-1266) on www.regylations.gov. Sincerely,

Kevin D. Schlemmer, Chief EAS 

### &Domestic Analysis Division
Trapper Creek

Northwater Creek

East Fork Parachute Creek

Ben Good Creek

East Fork Parachute Creek

East Middle Fork Parachute Creek

R94W

R95W

T6S

R94W

R95W

R94W

R95W

T4S

T5S

T5S T5S

R93WR94W

8014

8016

8014

8015

8012

8012

8011

8008

8010

8008

8008

8013

8004

8007

8006

8006

8009

8008

8000

8009

8

014

8046

JQS Road

8005

8004

8000

8003

T4S

T5S

8001

8000

800

0

First Anvil Creek

Second Anvil Creek

JQS Gulch

Golden Castle Gulch

Raspberry Creek

Yellowjacket Creek

T6S

T5S T5S

T6S T6S

Cow

Cree

k

Road

Piceance Creek Rd

7.5 Miles

Highway 13

11 Miles

E

Roan Cliffs

Long Ridge

Cook Ridge

Roan Cliffs

Short Ridge

Long Ridge

East Fork

Falls

Camp

Gulch

Grassy

Gulch

JV

Gulch

T

mi ber

Gulch

Third

Water

Gulch

Second

Water

Gulch

First Water G

ulch

S

heep

Trail Hollo

w

Goodrich

Park

Horse

Park

Highway 13

5 miles E

Tichner Draw

Æ·13

1 5 4 3 2 1

4 3 2 1

4 2

5

6

5 3

4 3

6

8

6

9 7 9

2 1

7 8

6

8 9

2

8 7 9

11 11

12

17

35

7

27

22

32

10

28

20

14

25

35

15

31

26

33

15

33

29

12

29

21

34

16

35 36

28

24

10

26

14 17

23 23

27

16 13

34

21 22 20

30

18

19

36

24

13

25

32 31

18

30

19

5

1

8

34

10 11

36

10 11 12

27

12

20

17

29

32

26

16

21

28

33

9

12

11

5

33

25

31

Roan Plateau Fall 2007 Travel Guide

s:\blm.share\VIS_Kim\brochures\Roan Plateau\roanplat_Fall_2007_brochure.pdf

All motorized and mechanized travel

on public lands is limited to primary

and secondary roads shown on this

map. Direct access to a suitable

camp site within 300 feet of a

designated motorized route is

authorized.

All travel designations on this map

are part of the Roan Plateau Plan

(2007). Road closures to motorized

vehicles protect big-game habitat

and cutthroat trout.

0 0.5 1 2

Miles

μ

9/01/2007

Road conditions vary depending

upon weather and maintenance

schedules. Winter maintenance

does not occur. Be prepared for

adverse conditions and/or

impassable roads any time of year.

Private Road

No Public Access

Major Highway

Primary Road

Secondary Road

Cow Creek Access Route

Cow Creek Road is the recommended

route for over-sized vehicles, vehicles with

trailers or 2-wheel drive vehicles.

JQS Access Route

JQS Road is steep,

narrow & recommended

for use only by 4-wheel

drive vehicles. It is

impassable when wet.

Tight switchbacks exist;

trailers not recommended.

Administrative

Motorized Use Only

BLM

Private

Foot/Horse Trail
No. 47593.

#### Protests 937113-G, etc., of New York Merchandise Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of *New York Merchandise Co.*v. *United States*(8 Cust. Ct. 209, C. D. 607) the brass base shells in question were held dutiable as parts of articles having as an essential feature an electrical element or device, such as signs, at 35 percent under paragraph 353 as claimed. It was also stipulated that the metal banks in question are not plated and that they are similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 42749. In accordance therewith they were held dutiable as hollow ware at 40 percent under paragraph 339 as claimed.
**EXHIBIT23**

**Analysis, Research & PlanningCorporation’s Consent**

Union CarbideCorporation:

Analysis, Research &Planning Corporation (“ARPC”) hereby consents to the use of ARPC’s name and thereference to ARPC’s reports appearing in this Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q of Union Carbide Corporation for the quarter endedMarch 31, 2007.

 

 
|        /s/ B. THOMAS FLORENCE |   |
|------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| B. Thomas Florence                                               |   |
| President                                                        |   |
| Analysis, Research & Planning Corporation                    |   |
| April 26, 2007                                                   |   |

 

20

----
**EXHIBIT32.2**

**Union Carbide Corporation andSubsidiaries**

**Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

I, Edward W. Rich, VicePresident, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of Union Carbide Corporation(the “Corporation”), certify that:

1.               the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Corporationfor the quarter ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.               the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.

 
| /s/ EDWARD W. RICH             |   |
|--------------------------------|--------|
| Edward W. Rich                 |
| Vice President,  Treasurer and |
| Chief Financial Officer        |
| October 31, 2006               |

 

28

----
# C_2016038EN.01002502.xml

| 1.2.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 38/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.2.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 38/25

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Netherlands) lodged on 5 November 2015 — X, Other party: Staatssecretaris van Financiën

(Case C-569/15)

(2016/C 038/37)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Referring court

Hoge Raad der Nederlanden

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: X

Applicant:

Other party: Staatssecretaris van Financiën

Other party:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Must Title II of Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 (1) be interpreted as meaning that a worker residing in the Netherlands who normally works in the Netherlands and who takes unpaid leave for three months is deemed to continue to be (also) employed in the Netherlands during that period if (i) the employment relationship continues during that period and (ii) for purposes of the application of the Dutch Werkloosheidswet (Law on unemployment) that period is considered to be a period of employment? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Must Title II of Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 (1) be interpreted as meaning that a worker residing in the Netherlands who normally works in the Netherlands and who takes unpaid leave for three months is deemed to continue to be (also) employed in the Netherlands during that period if (i) the employment relationship continues during that period and (ii) for purposes of the application of the Dutch Werkloosheidswet (Law on unemployment) that period is considered to be a period of employment?

1

| 2. | (a) | What legislation does Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 designate as applicable if during the unpaid leave that worker is employed in another Member State? |
| --- | --- | --- |

2.

(a)

What legislation does Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 designate as applicable if during the unpaid leave that worker is employed in another Member State?

| 2. | (b) | Is it still important in that regard that the person concerned was employed in the same other Member State twice in the following year and for periods of approximately one to two weeks during the subsequent three years, without any mention in the Netherlands of unpaid leave? |
| --- | --- | --- |

2.

(b)

Is it still important in that regard that the person concerned was employed in the same other Member State twice in the following year and for periods of approximately one to two weeks during the subsequent three years, without any mention in the Netherlands of unpaid leave?

---

(1)  Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 of the Council of 14 June 1971 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons, to self-employed persons and to members of their families moving within the Community (OJ 1971 L 149, p. 2).

1

---
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.4

                               AMENDMENT NO.1 TO

                          ACCESS RADIOLOGY CORPORATION

                          INVESTORS RIGHTS AGREEMENT.

     This is Amendment No. 1 (the "Amendment"), dated as of November 13, 1997,
to the Investors Rights Agreement dated as of September 30, 1997 among ACCESS
Radiology Corporation ("the Company")  and each of the holders of the Company's
Series J Preferred stock parties thereto (the "Investors").

     The parties agree as follows:

     1. Amendment of  Section 5.4 of the Investors Rights Agreement.  Section
        -------------------------------------------------------------
5.4 of the Investors Rights Agreement, "Excluded Equity Securities", is amended
by adding a new clause (h) as follows:

          (h) Shares of Series J Preferred Stock sold pursuant to the Series J
          Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement dated as of September 30, 1997
          among the Company and the Investors parties thereto, as amended from
          time to time.

     2. General. This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts,
        --------
each of which will be an original, but all of which together will constitute the
same instrument. This Amendment shall become effective as of the date set forth
above when executed as required by Section 7.5 of the Investors Rights
Agreement. Except as expressly amended hereby, all of the terms of the Purchase
Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment No. 1.

                              ACCESS Radiology Corporation


                              by_________________________
                              Scott Sheldon
                              President

                              Name of Investor:



                              by________________________
                              Name:
                              Title (if any):
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 00583

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

00583\00583_ Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

00583\00583_ HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

00583\00583_Certification Statement.pdf Plant certification statement

x 00583\00583_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

x 00583\00583_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 00583\00583_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 00583\00583_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 00583\00583_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 00583\00583_Part E.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 00583\00583_Part F.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 00583\00583_Part G.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 00583\00583_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 00583\Plant Contact\00583_Steam Electric Questionnaire Follow Up - Arapahoe Plant.docEmail communications regarding questions on the survey response

x 00583\Plant Contact\Arapahoe Follow Up Questions.xlsx Draft Questions for Follow Up

00583\SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS\00583_ COMPLIANCE PLAN.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

00583\SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS\00583_ MAP 1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

00583\SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS\00583_ TABLE 1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 254 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 254

   Recognizing and celebrating the centennial of Oklahoma statehood.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 13, 2007

 Ms. Fallin (for herself, Mr. Cole of Oklahoma, Mr. Boren, Mr. Lucas, 
and Mr. Sullivan) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which 
    was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
   Recognizing and celebrating the centennial of Oklahoma statehood.

Whereas on November 16, 1907, Oklahoma officially became the 46th State of the 
        Union;
Whereas prior to becoming a State, Oklahoma was designated as Indian Territory, 
        providing a vibrant history and culture that continues to enrich the 
        lives of its citizens;
Whereas the State of Oklahoma was shaped by those adventurous and daring 
        individuals who embraced the spirit of this great Nation as they opened 
        the frontier of the American West;
Whereas generations of proud people from all backgrounds have called Oklahoma 
        their home and have contributed to its spirited history;
Whereas these hearty and resilient people have defined what has come to be known 
        as the spirit of Oklahoma through their strength, character, and 
        persistent strides toward a bright future;
Whereas the continued strength, initiative, and pursuit of excellence displayed 
        by the citizens of the State of Oklahoma have produced its vibrant 
        economy and secured it as a place of opportunity and progress now and 
        for future generations;
Whereas the solid foundation of family and community embraced by the citizens of 
        Oklahoma has been a constant guide and source of strength to those 
        citizens throughout its history and will remain so long into its future;
Whereas the natural beauty and abundant resources of the State of Oklahoma 
        support a quality of life for its citizens that is unsurpassed; and
Whereas on November 16, 2007, the State of Oklahoma will begin a new century of 
        statehood: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That the Congress recognizes and celebrates the centennial of Oklahoma 
statehood and wishes its people another hundred years of continued 
growth, prosperity, and achievement.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2018104EN.01003101.xml

| 19.3.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 104/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.3.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 104/31

---

Judgment of the General Court of 5 February 2018 — MSD Animal Health Innovation and Intervet international v EMA

(Case T-729/15) (1)

1

((Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Documents held by the EMA and submitted in the context of the application for marketing authorisation for the veterinary medicinal product Bravecto - Decision to grant a third party access to the documents - Exception relating to the protection of commercial interests - No general presumption of confidentiality))

(2018/C 104/39)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicants: MSD Animal Health Innovation GmbH (Schwabenheim, Germany) and Intervet international BV (Boxmeer, Netherlands) (represented initially by: P. Bogaert, lawyer, B. Kelly and H. Billson, Solicitors, J. Stratford QC, and C. Thomas, Barrister, and, subsequently, by P. Bogaert, B. Kelly, J. Stratford, and C. Thomas)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Medicines Agency (EMA) (represented by: T. Jabłoński, A. Spina, S. Marino, A. Rusanov and N. Rampal Olmedo, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action under Article 263 TFEU for the annulment of Decision EMA/785809/2015 of the EMA of 25 November 2015, granting to a third party, pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents (OJ 2001 L 145, p. 43), access to documents containing information submitted in the context of an application for marketing authorisation for the veterinary medicinal product Bravecto.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders MSD Animal Health Innovation GmbH and Intervet international BV to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Medicines Agency (EMA), including those relating to the application for interim measures. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders MSD Animal Health Innovation GmbH and Intervet international BV to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Medicines Agency (EMA), including those relating to the application for interim measures.

---

(1)  OJ C 59, 15.2.2006.

1

---
#### F. W. Woolworth Co. *v.*United States

No. 6094.

Invoice dated Sonneberg, Germany, August 16, 1939.

Certified August 19, 1939.

Entered at Baltimore, Md., November 16, 1939.

Entry No. 1644/3.

*329(Decided February 2, 1945)

*Sharretts & Hillis (Edward P. Sharretts*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General *(Daniel I.*Auster, special attorney), for the defendant.

Kincheloe, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> It is hereby stipulated and agreed, by and between counsel for the respective parties hereto, subject to the approval of the court, that the facts and circumstances relating to the item of 10 per centum commission in the case listed in the annexed schedule, identified on the invoice with “xx” in green ink and the initials CHR of Examiner Charles H. Ritz, are in all material respects the same as the facts and circumstances relating to the item of 10 per centum commission specified in the invoices relating to glass tree ornaments, novelties, and figures covered by reappraisements 113038-A, 113040-A, .and 113468-A of the F. W. Woolworth Co. and passed upon by the United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals in *United States*v. *S. S. Kresge Co., B. Shackman & Co., Rice & Co. Corp., Strauss-Eckardt Co., Inc., F. W. Woolworth Co.,*26 C. C. P. A. 349, 352, wherein the court held that “A purchasing commission, charged for the handling of merchandise, is not a proper part of dutiable value.”

> . It is further stipulated and agreed, that on the date of exportation of the merchandise involved in the case listed in the annexed schedule, identified on the invoices with “xx” in green ink and the initials CHR of Examiner Charles H. Ritz, articles such and similar thereto were freely offered for sale and sold to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country of exportation in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade for exportation to the United States at the *per se*unit invoice prices, plus *3%*per centum social assessments for insurance, vacation, and holiday costs, plus packing, as invoiced, and that there was no higher foreign value.

> As to all other items, the appeal is abandoned.

> It is further stipulated and agreed, that the record in *United States*v. *S. S. Kresge Co. et al.,*26 C. C. P. A. 349, 352, be incorporated herein and that the said appeal to reappraisement is submitted on this stipulation.

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise represented on the invoice by the items marked “xx” in green ink and the initials CHR of Examiner Charles H. Ritz, and that such values are the *per se*unit invoice prices, plus *3%*per centum social assessments for insurance, vacation, and holiday costs, plus packing, as invoiced.

The appeal having been abandoned insofar as it relates to all other merchandise, to that extent the appeal is hereby dismissed.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.