STATEOFTENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAND CONSERVATION 9th Floor, L & C Annex 401 Church Street Nashville, TN 37243-1531

CERTIFIED MAIL #P 878 230 188 RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED


### Mr. Patrick Tobin Acting Reqioaal Admilistrator U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region IV 354 Courtland Street, N.E. Atlanta, Georgia 30365 ..-.,+

. .... ;A-uaL.. . 

### . ,,.-

, , *, !: 

### :x

,,

,... . , a ;I.: f"". , m , , . ,

### . -.. 

## -

. 1.. , ' Subject: Official Submittal of Request for Visibility Protection ; c
, .:~: , : 

### . -!1

, . ! i , . State Implementation Plan Revisions

.. j i :, ;I. 

# (

/I! 

# ~p, 

# 111993 iii 2

: !\ ,., Dear Mr. Tobin:

, 

## . , . >,&.. . .'
. ..

, 

### . 1 is,.' .(.,. ,. .., i,

# ;. ,i..i

### i



### ..... " ...--. 

## . ,". ..)

### ..<.*dl On January 22, 1993 an official request for incorporation 

### in(tb..Fh$ ~~tate



## ,. !..,-,

### ... ,... . ... Implementation Plan of a revision to Rule 1200-3-9-.O1 

### (5) (b)4., v~$~s?.L$'&,'.' ,..I ,,.. 

# -'. Protection, and the addition of Chapter 1200-3-23, VISISILITY PROTECTTTIN;-'6f' 

### L'. the Tennessee Air Pollution Control Regulations was hand delivered to 

### Ms. Leslie Cox under a cover letter addressed to Mr. Winston Smith. Supporting documentation was enclosed as follows: evidence of public hearing and notice, the Board meeting Minutes and signature page adopting the rule, a certification of Chapter 23 as state effective, and copies of the rules.
Also enclosed was a non-regulatory State Implementation Plan revision 

## - 2.16 VISIBILITY PR-OTECTION

# . The Environmental Protection Agency 

### is requested to process these revisions as part of the federally approved State impleaencarion Pian. Sincerely,



# ..6 {., 

# ., 

## C~!($!&,y,l& ~~<.;.&-~~ 

## fiy. BARRY R. s-r~pfi~;~ 

# b~ John 

### W. Walton, P. 

# t. Technical Secretary Tennessee Air Pollution Control Board

cc: Doug NeeleySTATE OFTENNESSEE DEPARTMENT

### OF ENVIRONMENTAND CONSERVATION 9th Floor, L 6 C Annex 401 Church Street Nashville, TN 37243-1531

CERTIFIED MAIL #P 878 230 188 RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED


### Mr. Patrick Tobin Acting Regional Administrator U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 

### IV 354 Courtland Street, N.E. Atlanta, Georgia 30365 Subject: Official Submittal of Request for Visibility Protection State Implementation Plan Revisions
Dear 

### Mr. Tobin:
On January 22, 1993 an official request for incorporation into the State Implementation Plan of a revision to Rule 1200-3-9--01 (5)(b)4., Visibility Protection, and the addition of Chapter 1200-3-23, VISIBILITY PROTECTION, of the Tennessee 

### Air Pollution Control Regulations was hand delivered to 

### Ms. Leslie Cox under a cover letter addressed to 

### Mr. Winston Smith. Supporting documentation was enclosed as follows: evidence of public hearing and notice, the Board meeting Minutes and signature page adopting the rule, a certification of Chapter 23 as state effective, and copies of the rules.
Also enclosed was a non-regulatory State Implementation Plan revision 

## - 2.16 VISIBILITY PROTECTION.
The Environmental Protection Agency is requested to process these revisions 

### as part of the federally approved State Implementation Plan.

Technical Secretary Tennessee 

### Air Pollution Control Board

cc: Doug NeeleySTATEOFTENNESSEE 

### DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAND CONSERVATION 

### 9th Floor, 

### L & C 

### Annex 401 Church Street Nashville, TN 37243-1531 January 22, 1993



### Mr. Winston A. Smith Director of 

### Air, Pesticides, and Toxics Management Division U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region IV 

### 354 Courtland Street, 

### N.E. Atlanta, Georgia 30365 Subject: Official Submittal of Request for Visibility Protection State Implementation Plan Revisions
Dear 

### Mr. Smith,
This 

### is an official submittal of a request for incorporation into the State Implementation Plan of a revision to Rule 1200-3-9-.01 (5) 

### (b) 4.. Visibility Protection, and the addition of Chapter 1200-3-23. Visibility Protection, of the Tennessee 

### Air Pollution Control Regulations. Supporting documentation 

### is enclosed as follows: evidence of public hearing and notice, the Board meeting minutes and signature page adopting the rule, a certification of Chapter 23 as State effective, and copies of the rules.
Also enclosed 

### is a non-regulatory State Implementation Plan revision 

## - 2.16 Visibility Protection. The Environmental Protection Agency 

### is requested to process these revisions as part of the federally approved State Implementation Plan.
Sincerely,

Technical Secretary Tennessee 

### Air Pollution Control Board
EnclosuresSTATEOFTENNESSEE 

### DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAND CONSERVATION 

### 9th Floor, L & C 

### Annex 401 Church Street Nashville, TN 37243-1531 January 22, 1993



### Mr. Winston A. Smith Director of Air, Pesticides, and Toxics Management Division U.S. 

### Environmental Protection Agency, Region IV 

### 354 Courtland Street, N.E. 

### Atlanta, Georgia 30365 Subject: Official Submittal of Request for Visibility Protection State Implementation Plan Revisions
Dear 

### Mr. Smith.
This 

### is an official submittal of a request for incorporation into the State Implementation Plan of a revision to Rule 1200-3-9-.O1 (5) (b) 

### 4., Visibility Protection, and the addition of Chapter 1200-3-23, Visibility Protection, of the Tennessee Air 

### Pollution Control Regulations. Supporting documentation 

### is enclosed as follows: evidence of public hearing and notice, the Board meeting minutes and signature page adopting the rule, 

### a certification of Chapter 23 as State effective, and copies of the rules.
Also enclosed 

### is a non-regulatory State Implementation Plan revision 

### - 2.16 Visibility Protection. The Environmental Protection Agency 

### is requested to process these revisions 

### as part of the federally approved State Implementation Plan.
Sincerely,

/I"John 

# :d. Waltoh. P.E. .- 

### Technical Secretary Tennessee Air 

### Pollution Control Board
Enclosures

## ,. 

# -1200-3-9-.*'I (5) 

# (b) 4.

4. Visibility Protection (i) Definitions 

### -Unless specifically defined in thispart, all termsshallhavethemeaning given them in chapter 1200-3-2, paragraph 1200-3-9-.01(4) and chapter 1200-3-23. (I) "Visibility protection area" means any area listed below: 

### I. Great Smoky Mountains National Park. 11. Joyce Kilmer-Slickrock National Wilderness Area. 111. Cohutta National Wilderness Area. IV. Linville Gorge National Wilderness Area. V. Shining Rock National Wilderness Area. VI. Sipsey National Wilderness Area. VI1. Mammoth Cave National Park. (ii) Review of major stationary sources and major modifications 

### - source applicability and exemptions. (I) No stationary source or modification to which the requirements of this part apply shallbegin actual construction without a permit which states that the stationary source or modification would meet those requirements. (11) Therequirements ofthispart shall apply toconstruction ofanynew major stationary sourceormajor modification that would be constructed 

### in anareaclassified asnonattainment and potentially have animpact onvisibility in anyvisibility protection area. (111) The requirements of this part shall apply to any major stationary source and any major modification with respect to each pollutant that it would emit,except as this part otherwise provides. (IV) Therequirements of this part shall not applytoa particular major stationary source or major modification, if: I. The source or modification would be a nonprofit health or nonprofit educational institution, or a major modification would occur at such an institution, and the governor of the State in which the source or modification would be located requests that it be exempt from those requirements; or 11. Thesourceormodification would be amajor modificationonly if fugitiveemissions,tothe extent quantifiable, are considered in calculating the potential to emit of the stationary source or modification and the source does not belong to any of the following categories: Coal cleaning plants (with thermal dryers); Kraft pulp mills; Portland cement plants; Primary zinc smelters; Iron and steel mills; Primary aluminum ore reduction plants; Primary copper smelters; Municipal incinerators capableof chargingmore than 250 tons of refuse per day; Hydrofluoric, sulfuric, or nitric acid plants; Petroleum refineries; Lime plants; Phosphate rock processing plants; Coke oven batteries; Sulfur recovery plants; Carbon black plants (furnaceprocess); Primary lead smelters; Fuel conversion plants; Sintering plants; Secondary metal production plants; Chemical process plants; Fossil-fuel boilers (or combinationthereof) totaling morethan250 million British thermal units per hour heat input; Petroleum storage andtransfer units with a total storage capacityexceeding Inn Mfl harrrlc.CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATING PERMITS CHAPTER 

### 1200-3-9 (Rule 

### 1200-3-9-.01, continued) (ii) Review of major stationary sources and major modifications 

### - source applicability and exemptions. (I) No stationary source or modification to which the requirements of this part apply shallbegin actual construction without apermit which statesthat the stationarysource or modification would meet those requirements. (11) Therequirements of thispart shall applytoconstruction of anynew major stationary source or major modification that would be constructed in an areaclassified

### as nonattainment and potentially have an impact on visibility in anyvisibility protection area. (111) The requirements of this part shall apply to any major stationary source and any major modification with respect toeach pollutant that it would emit, except asthis part otherwise provides. (IV) The requirements ofthis part shallnot applyto a particular major stationarysource or major modification, if:


### I. The source or modification would be a nonprofit health or nonprofit educational institution, ora major modification would occur at such aninstitution, and the governor of the State in which the source or modification would be located requests that it be exempt from those requirements; or 11. Thesourceor modification would be a major modification onlyif fugitiveemissions, to theextent quantifiable, areconsidered in calculating thepotential to emit of the stationary source or modification and the source does not belong to any of the following categories:

October, 

### 1989 (Revised) Coal cleaning plants (with thermal dryers); Kraft pulp mills; Portland cement plants; Primary zinc smelters; Iron and steel mills; Primary aluminum ore reduction plants; Primary copper smelters; Municipal incinerators capable of charging morethan 

### 250tons of refuse per day; Hydrofluoric, sulfuric, or nitric acid plants; Petroleum refineries; Lime plants; Phosphate rock processing plants; Coke oven batteries; Sulfur recovery plants; Carbon 

### black plants (furnace process); Primary lead smelters; Fuel conversion plants; Sintering plants; Secondary metal production plants; Chemical process plants; Fossil-fuel boilers(or combination thereof) totaling more than 

### 250million British thermal units per hour heat input; Petroleum storageandtransfer unitswith atotal storagecapacity exceeding 

### 300,000barrels;CONSTRUCTIONAND OPERATING PERMITS CHAPTER 1200-3-9 (Rule 1200-3-9-.01, continued) W. Taconite oreprocessing plants; 

### X. Glass fiber processing plants; 

### Y. Charcoal production plants; 

### 2. Any other stationary source category which, asof August 7, 1980,is being regulated under Chapter 1200-3-16, New SourcePerformanceStandards, or Chapter 1200-3-1 1, Hazardous Air Contaminants.
111. The sourceis a portable stationary sourcewhich haspreviously received a permit under this part; and
A. Theowner oroperator proposes torelocate the source and emissionsof the source at the new location would be temporary; and


### B. Theemissionsfrom the sourcewould not exceed its allowable emissions; and
C. Theemissions from thesourcewould impact no Class 

### I area andnoarea where an applicable increment is known to be violated; and


### D. Reasonablenotice is given totheTechnical Secretary prior totherelocation identifying the proposed new location and the probable duration of operation atthenewlocation. Such noticeshallbe giventotheTechnical Secretarynot lessthan 10daysin advanceoftheproposedrelocation unless a differenttimedurationis previouslyapprovedbytheTechnical Secretary. (V) Therequirements of this pan shall not apply toa major stationary sourceor major modification with respect to a particular pollutant if the owner or operator demonstrates that, as to that pollutant, the sourceormodification is located in an area designated as attainment. 

### (VI) Therequirements of this part shall not applytoa major stationary sourceor major modification with respect toaparticularpollutant,if theallowable emissionsof that pollutant from the source, orthe net emissions increase of that pollutant from the modification:
I. Would impact no Class 

### I area and no area where an applicable increment is known to be violated, and
11. Would be temporary. (iii) Visibility impact analyses.
Theowneroroperator of a sourceshallprovideananalysisoftheimpairment tovisibility that would occur asaresult ofthesourceormodification andgeneral commercial,residential, industrial and other growth associated with the source or modification. (iv) Federal land manager notification. (I) TheFederalLand Manager (FLM) andthe Federalofficial charged with directresponsibility for management ofFederal Class 

### I areas have 

### an affirmative responsibility toprotect the airquality related values (includingvisibility)of such lands and toconsider, in consultation with the Technical Secretary whether a proposed source or

October, 1989(Revised)/ "* 

### w CONSTRUCTIONAND OPERATING PERMITS (Rule 1200-3-9-.01, continued) modification will have an adverse impact on such values. CHAPTER 1200-3-9

(11) TheTechnicalSecretary shall provide written notification toall affected Federal Land Managers of anypermit application for any proposed new major stationary source ormajor modification that mayaffect visibility in anyvisibility protection area.The Technical Secretary shallalsoprovide such notificationtotheFederal officialcharged with direct responsibility for management of anylandswithin anysuch area. Such notification shallincludeacopyofallinformationrelevant tothepermit application and shall be given within 30days of receipt and at least 60days prior toany public hearing ontheapplication for a permit toconstruct. Such notification shall include ananalysis oftheproposed source's anticipated impactsonvisibility in anyvisibility protection area. TheTechnical Secretaryshall alsonotify all affected FLM's within 30 days of receipt of any advance notification of any such permit application. (111) TheTechnical Secretary shallconsider any analysis performed by the Federal Land Manager provided within 30 days of thenotification and analysis required by item (11) of this subpart, that such proposed new major stationary source or major modification mayhaveanadverse impact onvisibilityin anyvisibilityprotection area. Where theTechnical Secretary finds that such an analysis does not demonstrateto the satisfaction of theTechnical Secretary that an adverse impact on visibility will result in the visibility protection area, the Technical Secretary must, in the notice of public hearing, eitherexplain his decision orgive notice astowhere theexplanation can be obtained.
National visibility goal.
TheTechnical Secretaryshall onlyissue permitstothose sourceswhose emissionswill be consistent with making reasonable progress toward the national goal of preventing any future, and remedying any existing, impairment ofvisibility in visibility protection areas in which impairment results from man-made airpollution. In makingthedecisiontoissue a permit the Technical Secretarymay take intoaccount thecostsofcompliance, thetime necessary for compliance, the energy and nonair quality environmental impacts of compliance, and the useful life of the source. Monitoring.
TheTechnical Secretary may require monitoring of visibility in any Class I Federal area near theproposed new stationary sourceormajor modification for such purposes andby such means as the Technical Secretary deems necessary and appropriate. (c) Particulate matter air contaminant sourcesthat locate in orhave a significant impact on air quality in the Kingsport additional control area as defined in Chapter 1200-3-9.
1. Any air contaminant source which emits, or hasthe potential toemit 5 tons per year or more ofparticulate matter shallutilize best availablecontroltechnologyasspecifiedby theTechnical Secretary at the time of the completed permit application. 

### 2. "Significant impact on air quality" is defined as specified in subparagraph (a) of Rule l2OO-3-9-.Ol(2).



# I October, 1989 (Revised)

### RULES OF TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT 

### BUREAU OF ENVIRONMENT DIVISION OF AIR POLLUTION CONTROL
CHAPTER 1200-3-23 VISIBILITY PROTECTION

TABLE OF CONTENTS

12lO-3-23-.01 Purpose 1-3-23-.06 Visibility Standards for New and 1-3-23-.02 Definitions Modified Sourw 1-3-23-.03 General Visibility Protection Standards 1200-3-23-.07 Visibility Monitoring Requirements 1-3-23-.04 Specific Emission Standards for 1200-3-23-.08 Exemptions from BART Requirements Existing Stationary Facilities 1-3-23-.05 Specific Emission Standards for Existing Sources


### 1-3-23--01 PURPOSE.


### Thepurpose ofthis Chapter isto assure reasonable progress toward meetingthe goal of preventing any future, and remedying anyexistingimpairmentof visibilityin mandatory ClassI

### Federal areas in which impairment results from man-made 

### air pollution. 

### Authority: T.C.A.8848-25-105 and4-5-202. AdrninLrtraflveHlstory: Original rulefiled September21, 1988; effectiveNovember 6, 

### 1988.
1-3-23---02 DEFINITIONS.


### Unless specificallydefined in

### thisChapter,thedefmitionsfrom Chapter 1200-3-2 and Paragraph 1200-3--9-.01(4) shall apply:
1 "Best AvailableRetrofitTechnology (BART)" 

### meansanemission limitation based onthedegree of reduction achievablethroughtheapplicationofthebest systemofcontinuousemission reduction foreach pollutant which is emitted by an existing stationary facility. The emission limitation must be established, on a case-bycasebasis,taking intoconsiderationthe technology available,th~ costs of compliance,theenergy and nonairquality environmental impacts of compliance, anypollution controlquipmentin use orin existence atthe source, the remaining useful life of the source, and the degreeof improvement in visibility which may reasonably 

### be anticipated to result from the use of such technology.

I 

### (2) "Existing Stationary Facility" means any of the following stationary sources of airpollutants, including any reconstructed source, which was not in operation prior toAugust 7, 1%2, and was in existenceon August 7,1977, andhasthepotentialtoemit250tonsperyearormore ofany

### airpollutant. Indetermining the potential toemit, fugitive emissions must be counted, tothe extent quantifiable. Fossilfuel firedsttam

### electricplantsofmorethan250million Britishthermal unitsperhourheat input. Coal cleaning plants (thermal dryers), Kraft pulp mills, Portland cement plants, Primary zinc smelters, Iron and steel mill plants, Primary aluminum ore reduction plants, Primary copper smelters, Municipal incinerators capable of charging more than 250tons of refuse per day, Hydrofluoric, sulfuric, and nitric acid plants,
October, 

### 1989 (Revised) 

### 313.546

### LEAD EMISSIONS STANDARDS (Rule 12-3-23-.02, continued) CHAPTER 12-3-23

(k) Petroleum refineries, (l) 

### Lime plants, (m) Phosphate rock processingplants, (n) Coke oven batteries, (0) Sulfurrecovery plants, @) 

### Carbon black plants (furnaceprocess), (q) 

### Primary lead smelters, (r) Fuel conversion plants, (s) Sinteringplants, (t) Secondary metal production facilities, (u) chemical process plants, (v) Fossil-fuel boilers of more than 250 million British thermal units per hour heat input, (w) Petroleum storage and transfer facilities with a capacity exceeding 300,000barrels, (x) Taconite ore processing facilities, (y) Glass fiber processing plants, and (2) 

### Charcoal production facilities. "Federal Class I area" means any Federal land that is classified or reclassified "Class I".
"Fixed Capital Cost" means the capital needed to provide all of the depreciable components. "In existence" meansthat the owneror operator has obtainedall necessarypreconstruction approvalsor permits required by this Division and eitherhas (1) begun, or caused to begin, a continuousprogram of physical on-site constructionof the facility or 

### (2) entered into binding agreementsor contractual obligations, which cannot be cancelled or modified without substantiallosstothe owner or operator, to undertake a program of.construction of the facility to be completed in a reasonabletime.
"In operation" means engaged in activity related to the primary design function of the source. "Mandatory Class I Federal area" means the Great Smoky MountainsNational Park, the Joyce Kilmer 

## -SlickrockNationalWildemessArea, theLinvilleGorgeWildernessArea,CohuttaWildernessArea, Shining Rock WildernessArea, Sipsey Wilderness Area, and the Mammouth Cave National Park including any integral vista associated with these areas. "Natural Conditions" includesnaturallyoccurring phenomenathat reducevisibility as measured in terms of visual range, contrast, or coloration.
"Reconstruction" 

### willbe presumed tohavetakenplace wherethefixedcapitalcostofthenewcomponent exceeds 50 percent of the fixed capitalcost of a comparableentirelynew source. Any final decision asto whether reconstruction has occurred must be made in accordance with the provisions of part 12-3-16.01 (9)(b)6.(i) through 

### (i). "Visibility impairment" means any humanly perceptible change in visibility (visual, range, contrast, coloration) from that which would have existed under natural conditions. "Significant Impairment" meansvisibilityimpairmentwhich, in the judgment oftheTechnical Secretary, interfereswith the management, protection, preservation,or enjoymentof the visitor's visual experience of the mandatory Class I Federal area. This determinationmust be made on a case-by-casebasis taking into account the geographicextent, intensity,duration, frequency, and time of thevisibility impairment, and how these factors correlate with times of visitoruse ofthe mandatory Class I Federal area, and the frequency and timing of natural conditionsthat reduce visibility.

October, 1989 (Revised) 313.547LEAD EMISSIONS STANDARDS CHAPTER 1200--3-23 (Rule 1200-3-23-.02, continued) (12) "Integral vista" means a view perceivedfromwithinthemandatoryClassIFederalareaof aspecific landmark or panorama located outside the boundary of the mandatory Class I Federal area. (13) "Continuous program of physicalon-site construction" means significant and continuous sitepreparation work such asmajor clearingorexcavationfollowedby placementoffootings, pilings, and other materials of construction, assembly, or installation of unique facilities or equipment at the site of the source. (14) "Substantial loss" generally means aloss which would equalorexceed 10percentofthe totalproject cost. Authority: T.C.A. 8868-25-105 and 4-5-202. Administrative History: Original rulefiled September21, 1988; effectiveNovember 6, 1988.
1200-3-23-.03 GENERALVISIBILITY PROTECTION STANDARDS. (1) No person shall cause, suffer, allow, or permit emissions in excess of the standards in this Chapter. (2) Upon mutual agreement of the owner or operator of 

### a source and the Technical Secretary, an emission limitation more restrictive than that otherwise specified in this Chapter may be established. Also, upon mutual agreementof the owner oroperator of any source and the Technical Secretary, operating hours, process flowrates, orany otheroperating parameters maybeestablished

### asabindinglimit@).Themutuallyacceptable limits shallbe stated 

### as a specialcondition(s)for any permit ororder concerning the source. Violation of any accepted special limitations is grounds for revocation of the issuedpermit and/or other enforcement measures provided for in the Tennessee Air Quality Act. (3) Thepossession of avalidpermit shall not protect thesourcefromenforcement actionsifpermit conditions are not met. Authority T.C.A.8868-25-105 and4-5-202. Administrative History: Original rule filed September 21, 1988;effective November 6, 1988.

1200-3-23--04 SPECIFICEMISSION STANDARDS FOR EXISTING STATIONARY FACILITIES.
For anexistingstationary facilitythatcauses visibilityimpairmentin anymandatory Class

### IFederal area, theTechnical Secretary shall specifyonthe operating permit(s)as permit conditions the emission limitation that is "best available retrofit technology (BART)". Authority: T.C.A.#$68-25-105 and 4-5-202. AdministrativeHistory: Originalrulefiled September 21, 1988; effectiveNovembk 6, 1988. 1200-3-23--05 SPECIFICEMISSION STANDARDS FOR EXISTING SOURCES. For anyexistingsourcethat causes visibilityimpairmentin anymandatory ClassIFederalarea,the Technical Secretary may specifyonthe operating permit(s) as permit conditions an emissionlimitation that is equivalentto 'BART'. Existing sources subject totheprovisionsofrule (.04) arenot subjecttotheprovisions of this Rule (1200-3-23-.05). Authority: T.C.A.8868-2.5-105 and 4-5-202. Administrative History: Original rulefiled September 21, 1988; effective November 6, 1988.

October, 1989 (Revised)LEAD EMISSIONS STANDARDS CHAPTER 1200-3-23 1200-3-23-.06 VISIBILITY STANDARDS FOR NEW AND MODIFIED SOURCES. (1) A new "major stationary source" or a "major modification" constructing in an attainment area or unclassifiable area must meet the requirements in Paragraph 1200-3-9-.01(4), Prevention of Significant Deterioration. (2) A new "major stationarysource" or a "major modification" constructing in a non-attainment areamust meet the requirements in Parts 1200-3-9-.01(5)(b)3. and 4. (3) For any new source or modification whose air contaminant emissions may cause visibilityimpairment in a mandatoryClass 

### I Federal area, theTechnical Secretary may require "best availablecontroltechnology (BACT)". Authority: T.C.A. 8868-25-105 and 4-5-202. Administrative History: Original rule filed September 21, 1988; effectiveNovember 6, 1988. 1200-3-23-.07 VISIBILITY MONITORING REQUIREMENTS. The Technical Secretary may require visibility monitoring in the vicinity of a source regulated by this Chapter 1200-3-23. Thism6nitoring shallbe donein accordance withtherequirements as specifiedbytheTechnical Secretary.
t Authority: T.C.A.8868-25-105 and 4-5-202. Administrative History: Original rule filed September 21, 1988; effective November 6, 1988. 1200-3-23-.08 EXEMPTIONS FROM BART REQUIREMENTS. Any existing stationary facility subject totherequirement of this chapter toinstall, operate, and maintain BART may apply to the Technical Secretary for an exemption from that requirement. Anapplication underthis rule must include all availabledocumentationrelevanttotheimpactofthesource's emissionsonvisibility in anymandatory Class

### IFederalarea and a demonstration by theexistingstationary facility that it does not or will not, by itself or in combination with other sources, emit anyair pollutant which may bereasonably anticipated tocause orcontributetoa significant impairment of visibility in any mandatory Class 

### I Federal area. Any fossil-fuel fired power plant with a total generating capacity of 750megawatts or more may receive anexemption from BARTonlyiftheowneroroperator of such power plant demonstrates tothesatisfactionof theTechnical Secretarythatsuchpower plantislocatedatsuch a distancefromallmandatory Class 

### I Federal areas that such power plant does not orwill not, by itself or in combination with other sources, emit any 

### air pollutant which may reasonably be anticipated tocause or contributetosignificant impairment of visibility in any such mandatory Class I Federal area. The existing stationary facility must give prior written notice to all affected Federal Land Managers of 

# - any application for exemption under this rule. TheFederal LandManager mayprovide aninitial recommendation orcomment onthedispositionofsuch application. Suchrecommendation,where provided, mustbepart oftheexemption application. This recommendation is not to be construed as the concurrence required under Paragraph (6) below. TheTechnical Secretarywithin 90 days of receipt of anapplication forexemption from control, will provide notice of receipt ofanexemption application and notice of opportunity forpublic hearing ontheapplication. After noticeand opportunityforpublic hearing, theTechnical Secretary may grant or denythe exemption. An exemption granted by the Technical Secretary under this rule will be effective only upon concurrence by all affected Federal Land Managers with the Technical Secretary's determination. Authority: T. C.A


## .8868-25-105 and 4-5-202. Administrative History: Original rule filed September 21, 1988; effective November 6, 1988.

October, 1989 (Revised)

### Opening 

### Statement 

### for Ilearing - 

### Nashville

1 

### would like to call this public hearing to o,rder, hly 

### name is Harold Ilodges, 

### I am tile Director of the Division of Air Pollution Control znd I 

### am the Hearing Officer this I-norning. This hearing is being hcld by the Tennessee Air Pollution Control DoaI-d.
This public hearing has been called to consider proposed amendments and rules to the ?'ennessc?e air ]:olli~tion regulations and amcndr-nents to the State IrnpIc~ne~>tation Plan. These are as lollows:

a. P.rnend~ne~?ts to Chapter 16,Fossil Fuel Fired Steam Generators

I. 

### A~nc~idm~nts to Chapter-22, 

### Lead Emission StJndards



### c. AI-ricnd~nents to Ch~pter.16; Auto~nobi!c

### and Light Euty 

### ?'ruck, Surface Coa.ting Operations

f. Ncw

### R~.;la in 

### Chaptcr 16, Petroleum Ilry Cle;ln(irs


### g. New Rule iii 

### Chapter 16, Phosphate Rock Plants
h. 

### Inclusion of icst methods IS, 21, 22, 

### 24, clnd 25 in Chapter 16 to deterrniw certain air pol1u;ants.
j. 

### Revision to Stale Iinplerner~tationPlan for Metropolitan Nashville and kavidson County _Forcarbon 

### ITIO!IQXI~~nonattajr?riient. 

### j. 1iepc;l of Chapter 17, Administrative Procedures



### ,



## . Inland Container Corporation-Requcst for regulatory relief from particulate standard when burning l~esvy spent liquor in wood refuse I~oilers. 

### I. Arncndrnents to Chapter 

### 6, New Fuel Burrling Equipment

.. , 

### In. Reclassify portio~;s of Roane County from unclassified to attainment for sulIur dioxide.



### n. Revision to IHolston Army Ammunition's permit to open burn explosive waste and explosive contaminated waste.

o. New Chapter, Visibility ~'rotection and associated "on-regulatory SIP amendments.

p. Amendments to Chapter 

### 5,Visible Emissions

### q. Arnendinents to Chapter- 20, Limits on 

### E~nissions due to Malfunctions, ,-.% 

### St,2rtu:,s, and Shutdowns

r, Revisions to Chapter 19, Nonst:ain~nentAreas

s. Arnendinents to Chapter 10,Sar-nplinp,,Recording, and Reporting

t. Arnend~nents to Chapter 11,Hazardot~s Air Conlaminants

I. 

### Revisions and amendments to Ch~pter 9, Construction and Operating Permits, regarding the growth policy and visibilit)~ protection requirel-nen ts.

v. 

### /"\ciitions to Chapter 2, 

### Definitions



### w. ;\finor revisions to Chapters 

### 3, 5, 

### 6, and 

### S regarding additional control areas.

y. CIh;?ng~s in TVEE 

### ki\letilod 3, 

### "zero percent opacity"
This hearing js a requireine~?t of the Unifor~n Administrative Procedures Act, 

### the Tennes:;ce 

### Air Quality .r\ct,and tile Federal Clcsn Air Act.
I 

### want to cinph;:sizc 

### (I) that ::!e are not 

### here to debote the testimony 

### presented b~lt

, 

## ... to listen 2nd only ask qiicstions ;or clnriiic~tion and 

### (2) that writ.ten slatcrnents not p:esci~tsdat tllis I-;t:,2:il?g 

### ill only be 

### considered part ol the record 

### if ~.cceived ill

>+ 

### tile office of the Teciiillcal Secre-tar?, Tennessee Air Pollution Control Division, 150 Ninth Aveni.!c, Y!oi.h, 

### Terra Building Gth Floor, Nasllville, Ten~wssce 37219- 5404 by 

### 4:jO p.m., April 19, 1985.
Notice of 'tiijs hearing was pi~biiciaedin ne\ilspapers of general circulation 2s required by Tcnnessw Code Annotated Cection 6s-25-103 and in the Tcnncssec Administrative Register as required by Tennessee Code Annotated Section 4-531. The copies 01 lhex proposed srncndrncnts \illc.rc? available far public inspection at various locations throughout the state. 

### A copy of these notices 

### \\:ill be made a permanent 

### part of the record.
The procecdi~ngs of this hearing arebeing recorded and copics of the hearing record will be 

### avsilaS1e for the cost of reproduction. Requests for such copies should be sent to tl~c Technical Secretary at tllc previously-mentioned address. Compilers of the testimony presented st this hearing reserve the right to include extensive or buiky testimony Ijy 

### reference only.
Verbal or written testimony, ejtiler for or against the matters under discussion, may be presented atthis hearing.
Each person desiring to present verhal testimony must 

### he properly recognized 

### by the hearing officer and must make such statement at the podium up front. Any person desiring to present verbal cornrnents at this hearing should be prepared to offera written statement for-the hearing record.

### If you 

### have 

### an additional written copy of your statement, we \iiould like to have it

--. ? 

### il-nmediately prior to the presentat;ori of yorir 

### testimony. If you havc only one hvrittenCopy of )/oar testirnony, we would appreciate lisving such copy after you have concluded your statement. To facilitate the scliedi~ling and ident.ification of those presenting testir-nony, it is reqr~cstedthat each person desirir?g to present 

### testimony take one of the cards provided and print )!our name, addr-ess,business, or-gsnization or afiiliation. 

### If yoa are not associated with a business or organization or 

### if your stateinen-tis ilnrelated to such association, piease indicate such on the card.
idas 

### everyone sjgned a 

### 3 

### x 5 card indicsting your presence and desire to speak? If 

### so, cvcryone desiring to present tcstirnony is requested to 

### stand, raise t!ieir right hand and repeat aiter 

### me, "I, aiiirrn that the oral and/or 1.vritlen testimony 

### I arn about to give js The trutl), to the best of my knowledge, infor!-nation,and belicf."

### .....

. . 

### . .... 

## .

.....

STATE OFTENNESSEE DEPARTMENTOF ENVIRONMENTAND CONSERVATION 

### DivisionofAir Pollution Control Board 401 Church Street 9th Floor L & 

### CAnnex Nashville,Tennessee 37243-1531


### May 6, 1997

Mr.John H.Hankinson,Jr. Regional Administrator U.S.EPA, Region IV Atlanta Federal Center 100Alabama Street, SW Atlanta, Georgia 30303 Certified Mail #P 023 337 572 Return Receipt Requested

Re: Withdrawal of SIP Submittal
Dear Mr. Hankinson:
Thisisto officiallywithdraw the nonregulatory part ofthe February 9, 

### 1993, submittalofa proposed SIPamendment. On February 9,' 1993, the Stateof Tennessee submittedto Region IV a proposed SIP amendment concerning visibility protection. This submittal included regulatory and nonregulatory provisions. By today's letter the Stateofficially withdraws the nonregulatory part of theFebruary 9, 

### 1993, submittal.
Please feel freeto contact John Patton at (615) 532-0604 ifthere areany questions about this matter. Sincerely, 

# N. ).J& ohn W.Walton, P.E. Technical Secretary TennesseeAir Pollution Control Board

cc: Linda Anderson-Carnahan

# PUBLICATION CERTIFICATE

4 

### 1165 Kingspor~, Tcnn

## .,................................... ............,. .......................

,

### . This is to ccrtify that the 

### Lcgal Nolice hcrcto altachcd was pullisf~cdin tlic Kingsport

. I Tilllcs, a 

### dally rlcwpapcr 

### published in the City of Kingsport, Coc~nty of Sulfivan, Statc of Tcnncsscc, bc

# -/?

..... C 

### ginning in tl~c issue of

...................................

# :k%.:k.~..h

...



### .! 

## 7

....................................................................., and appearing 

### /

................................................ronsccu~ive 

### wccks-limes, as 

### pcr ordcr ol

....



# J:;<.:.~.;n~.i..i.~,..i. c-.<:

....

# d':z!~[>~p~~!~:~~.k~:,~ {CL.

........ ...... .... 

### t

# j::

.......

## \liQ~;.~i!~.i> LM.?;L 

# fi

.......................................................................................................



## -- 

# 1 LEGALNOTICE

Nollcc Is hcrebv ulvcn lhal Ihe Tcnncsscc Alr Polluflon Conlrol Dwrd wlll hold a ~vbllc hcorlnu. I Tho purpose 01 Ihls heorInu Is lo recclvc publlc comrncnl concernlnu pro- ~0.5cd revlslons of Iha 

### ( Tcnncsscc Alr Pnll~~llon ; Conlrol rcorrlotlons nnd 

## / Ihc Slole Irn~lemcnlallon

plan. Al Ihls heorln~. Ihc 

# _ __l_--llll__-.llll--- following wlll bc consldcrcd:

a. Arncndrncnls lo Fosrll Fucl Flrcd. Slcom Gcncrotors b. Arncndrncnls lo Lcud Emlsslon slondords
C. Arncndmcnls to Avlomobllc and Llglll Dulv Truck Surlace CoollnP Opcrollons d. New rulcs rcwrdlnu Ec~ul~mcnl lcoks ol Vololllc Orponlc compounds In Petroleum Rcllncrlcs

c. Ncw rulcs reoordlnQ Flcxlblc Vlnyl oncl UrcIhonc Coollnu and PrlnlQ. NCW rulcs rcgordlna Pllospholc Rock Plonls - .. ...... r. Rcvlslons lo Cho~lcr 19. Nonollolnmcnl Arcos. lor growlh In Iho~c orcos
s. Anicndrncnls to Clio~- Icr on Rcqulrcd SornPllng. Rccordlno, and Rc~orllna. Amblcnl Monlforlng Rcqulrcd I.Arncndmcnls lo ChaDlcr on hozurdous Alr .ConlomInanls. Mercurv

u. Rcvlslons lo Chopler 9. Growth Pollcv

v. Addlllon lo Cha~lcr 2ol Ihc dcllnlllon 01 nonallolnmcnl arcos

w. Mlnor rcvlsloo3 to Cho~Icrs 3, 5. b, OIKJ 8 reoordlnp oddlllonol conlrol orcos
x. Anicndmcnls la Chop lcr 10, VOC cmlssl6n slondords, chnllcrln9 fhc com~lloncc dcIcrmlnoIlon colculoflon fcchnlwc and

.ad..- - -.-,t..,.,-- -# . 

## -- 795 Surnmor Avcnuc JockSon, Tcnncsscc 30301 Alr Follullon Conlrol Dlvlslon Cookcvlllc Rcglonol Offlcc P.O. Box 503.1 Tcnncsscc Tech Unlvcr?ll v ~ookcvlllc. ~cnncs&c 30501 ! Dlvlr.lon of AI~ ~o~~ullon Conlrol ~cmphls-S:lclbv Counlv tlcollh Dc~l. 014 Jcllcrson Avcnue Mcrnpllls, Tcnncssee 30105 Alr Pollullon Conlrol DlvlSl0ll Johnson Cll~ licplonol Ofllcr 1233 ~0ulhVksl Avcnuc Exlenslon Johnson CIIv. Tcnncsscc 37601 Alr Follullon Conlrol Dlvlslon Challonoogo Rcelonol Offlrr 'cnuc 'CSSCC \.. ., ,
':a ':

. .! 

### i:rlAGE 

## BLOOD TESTS



## .. I ' :iLLA TESTING ALSO

. ,. ' 

### ,, .HIS PATHOLOGY LAB

, : Voloul Grave Rd. 458-1135

, ., , .

.\ , ' .Onen 6 Dan8-5 Legal Nollcc ' Nolicc is hereby given that Ihc Tcn'ncsser: Air ~0liu:ion Conlrol Roard will hold a public hcariny. The purpose pi lhis hearing is lo receive publo': cornnlcr~l conccrn!ng proposed rc~irions lo Ihe Tcnnr%$ecAir Pollulion Conlrol rcgulalions and Ihc Slate Irn~lerncntalion Pjan. At lhir hcariny. thc lollow#ng will bc consiilcrcd: . 

# -

a. Arncndmcntl to Fossil f-uclFircdSlc~rn Gencr?lors , b. Amenrirncnls lo Lead Cmlr~lon Slandards c. Arncndrncnlr lo Avtornohilc and Ligltl ~uly(~ruck.Sur:

face Coatiny Opcrat~ons d. Ncw rulcs rcgardiny Equipnrcnl IL~akr of Valalilc~Or~ ganic Cornpo~ond$ in Pclrolcum Rclincries c. Ncwrulcs rcyariny Flcxibic Vinyl and Urclhanc Conlini

and Printing 

### .. .. I.

Ncwrules regarding Pclrolrum Dry CICarlCrs ".

, y. Ncwrulcs rcyardiny Phosphnlc Rock Planls . . h. Inclusion ol Icsl mclhod 18, 11, 71. 14 and Z!! ln,Ncw

S~lurccPcrlormance Slandards lay dclcrrnjnalio?. o! curlaln air pollutanls. . , i.Rcvi>ionloSIP lor Metropolilan Nashville and ~ovidio6 Counly srca regordiny nonalla~nrncnl for carbon rnovox: :A,.
. . ,\.<. I.Hcpcal of ~ha(>tcr'II. Adrninislralivc f'rurrdurr: 

## . .. k. Inland Conlnincr Corporalton

### - Hcqucll for rcgulaiory

rclicl from lhc porliculalc slan~lnrd whrn burniny.nn>- monivmrulfllespcnl llguor Lhcavy,spcnl liquor) inwood ' relurc hoilcrs. . . ,, a. I.Arncndmrnk lo Non-Procesi Emisslon Slandards, NCW FuelDurniny Equipment "1. Rcciassificalion ol Porlions of Roanc Counly Irorn'unclassilicd lo Allainrncnl lor Sullur Dloxidc. # ,,. n. Hcvlsion to Hol%ton Army Ammunilion's lrcrrnil lo npeq burn cxplosivc wasle andcxplosivc conlerninaicdwnsIC. o. New Chilplcr lo rcyul.llion%. 1100-3.71. Visibtlily Pro!cc:

lion and arsocialcd non., cyul.alory SIP amcndmcnlr. p.Arncndrncnls lo visiblc crnisrions sl.andards. Excmi).

lions andMclhatJr a1 Evaluolion and Rccorchny, and variolls rilahyrr Ill Ihc visihlc ornirrton rcildiny rnclhod: q.Arncndmcnl) lo Chaptcr on 1.11n111 011 Emtrslons dire lo rnalluncliot~r,~Iarl-ups,and shutdowns. R~rtorls' Hd. ~uircd

. . r. Revisions lo Chnplcr IV, Non.ellainrnc?nl ~rcns,' lor

yrowlh in lharr araas s. Arncndrncnls loChaplcr on fiequirrdS.>n,i,linq. hiccord.

~np, and I:cI?orl~ng.P.mbicn1 Manilorlnq Rcrluircd '. I.Arncndrncnts 10 Chaplcr on 1,nrardour Air conlarn,inanlr. Mcrcury u. I1rvisioor loClloi,lcr V, Growth Policy Y. Addillon%lo Chapter 2 01 Ihr: dclin~lion ol non-allair; men1.lrra~

. .~. w. Minor revisions lo ChaDtcri 3. 5, 6.' and 8 rcya;diGg

addiltonal conlrol arcas , . r.Arrtcnclrncnls lo C~JIIIC~ 18. VOC cmiscion slandardl,

Clionqiny Ille r.orn(,li,lncc cJclcrmina1;on c~lcul~l~an tech- nirluc and adding a dellnilion 01 "~orn~lylng coalin!l".' , y. Amrndmrnl loTVEE Mclhod3 "Zero Perccnl Opacil~". 1.Arnrndrnonlr loC!>aPll.r 9 loinzludn vos~bil~ly prolCClion rellulrcmcnls The hrcsrwq will b hnlci 0% lollnws Cil, 0-1. i;ml .. . Flntn No!hrilla Apd 18, 1905 V 30 u.m , Cn171rnl TSIJ. Vowllmrn 

### - IO!l>& Cl>",I~ll"-

Room 110 ., 

### . ThC tlv.lr8rlg ts bcirlg It~ld pursudnl lo sccliorl 68-25.lM 3f Ihc Tconca\cr Air Ovalily Acl in nccordanrn .a,"'. " ,,r,,",<i,-". is. VS -

# -pro-6rtv: &ATED in Dislricl NO Six (6) 01 Knox COUnlV

, Tennessee ond will1 ll~ corporolc hill01 Illc Cill 01 ~noxvillc,

.Tennes:ec I~cing known clore lull1 dcscrihrrl as lollows: BEGINNING 01 an iron nil 10~oted in the wcslcrl riyht of woy line 01 Wake licld Rood suid iron oil being locokdin 0 norlhcr ly dircchon 300.00 fCr froni lhc inlcrseclion n snid rig111 of way lirlc 0 Kingslon Pike lhenrl Iron7 mill ooinl'ol bcpin n;nv Sovlh 73 dro. 10 mir 1s4;. WCSI 337.86 Ice! 11 on iron p~n;'lhence Norll 10 dcy. 35 rnin. 30 SO< 'ucsl nA.ll fecl lo on ilo8
< . pin, lhcncc Sotrtll 61 <I?<

07 min. IS scc. Wc: 719.lfl lael Is an iron Pir corner lo oroprrlv nf Pal llcllon' Ihcncc Nortll 1

, deg. 38 rnin. 45 scc. Weq 545.48 fccl lo an iron rlnl corner of Boxwood llill subdivisicm' lhrnc~ Nor1 65 c~cg. win. 11 scl

. Easl 90.49, Irct I0 Oh il.0 pin' lhencc Norlh 64 11cl ' 76 ;,,in. 15 scc. Eosl 100.5 lccl lo on iron pin; lllrnr ~orlh 64 drg. 10 niin. 1 JCC.Ens1 131.15 lrrl to a iron pin thence Norlh 6

3-- I"-;.i lo <PC. EO .. . - . PI! WcIsIe.
,. Nrw Ch(111ier lo welllo. ; IIOII~, 1100-3.13, V~sil~~l~lV Proleclinn nntl n?soc#rtlrr~

....... "

, "cormplyinn coulin~". 

### oiG&rj-ih IIC oll~c'ol ht y. Amc~lrlmcnl lo: TVEE ~~"i\lcr for Knox Counly McI110tl 3 "Lcro Pcrccnll Tenncr5ce in lhok 7011 Onncilv" 

# I

~onc 938'c1n<1 111c unncr ~<,;'<;?vi,~~;gnvin(is 8 Loon n~.,,-c,~lion 01 :rvlr:VillC llC +,l,,,l, ,,r",,,,%<"r,, nn1c Akvi

I 

### Oalrwood Homes I

6401 CllHTON HWY



### . 

## ' 917-1502 ATTENTIOH LAllDOWllfRS 

### ! 704 S~I. 11. rwrgy clliciclll holnc. 7 BRs, I 1)olhs. $14.500.). ,Insurance ComrnlHee Challsnoops PublliSchool1 1161West 4Mh Street ' IChnltanoopa, Tennasaee l7~nL -7-rr no?1dsj; ' ' WOTIC~ .OF. HEARING SY BOARD OF APPEALS FOR VARIAHCES, SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS &HD SPECIAL PERMITSOF THE CITY OF CHATTANOOOA, TenNESSEE. TAKE NOTICE Thnl the Board Of AppeaIa 01 the Clb of Chaltanoooa, Tennelwa, wlll on 

# . , I",Tonneslee, In bar 01 all rlph' 

### i 

# 11 stand. 

### .dl

I

I I

I Business Opportunity

I.

ol redempllon, dower, and homt slcsd lo the exlenl provlded.ln raid Deed ofTrusPand Liy lnw,.dhc 11 ~lnadrru1MrL~ro~cr 

# P AI~ tnat tracl or parce-

, lnnd lylnp and Delnp In the

: ~ly'Ol"Cha1tanoops.Hsmll-..,

ton -County. Tennessee. belnp Lo1 lb5, Revlsed Plsl 01 Lake Vlsla Subdlvlslon, Unll 3, a1 shown by plsl 01 record In Plat Book XI, Pape 86. Rcolaler'a Olllce, Hamilton Counly, Tenncllee, belnp known aa 7711 Canyon Drlvo, Chatlanoooa, 1 ennev 

# 1

# -

LOST LARGE male d00, blnck h ~DVEUTISlNa ,ubllcallon, f Eslsbllrl~ed au :ome, car a mme, addres OR AH ~guress~r.penanloclop malllnp scrvlce bu,~ncsr Ith Cornpuler equlpmenl 6 locaon. Can gnnermleequltY Poslllon. nallcapltal required. Resume to 0 Box 1406. Chatts TN37401.

. # WIIIIC, :rh kga. Braln;rdl~oore ~d, n-ward. 6?l-lS% Moving and Islea Manaper old GA 3U72-b. A GOOD 0 

# 1



# 86

# Ib&nesl For 

# I 10

# IUarsiiied

### Adr

# I

led. bld property shall be sold a% the 'property ol Uobarl J. Slurnes and wlle, Jullel It. Sturnas, wllhoul covrnnnls or warrants ol tllla, expreas or Implied, and sublecl to any unpnld tares or olhar llonr, earemenls or W~~ALL.SOPTBALL umwc :AGES. Seaaonsl ~u~lnaas for wnerloperator. Next10Norihpale '01t Oftlco. Call 1SbMn.

CRAFTS-COKSICMKT 

### SHOP leryeslabllshed. 8?7&7lW4-9lY. )ELI Convenlenc. store cstsbllrhd prollteble. ~nvanfory.e~b n;nt exceed asklnp prlcb. ml-f4m. . - - illy Hsll ~nrkx, hold a hearlnp I purluanlloOrdlnanca NO.9:0 on lho requell ol Muoller Co., lor a Vsrlance to locate metal bulldlnp wlthln 5 fl. ol propert Ilne, lor property located at 14gl Mueller Are.

Any person whole property may be nlleclad by the pranl or denlal lhereol mny allond and be heard.

THIS tho l@lh day01 Marcli. 1'285. 1.0. HARDEM CHAIRMANOF THE BOARD BY: Shlrley Crornovar IY-5W PUBLIC NOTICE OFMEETINGOF THE DOAIID OF DIRECTORS OF THE CHATTAMOOOA AREA A PRO 

# JOB

# R1
L up Wrllel' LEGALNOTICE .c Is hcrcby plven lhal Ihc lelrec Air Pollutlon Control d wlll hold a publlc hearlnp. r>urpose 01 lhls hearlno Ir lo whllc you wal' praxantatlons.

Prolesionl 1Northgate 

### I '+dlJob HI

ARTIST PA Palle-up. M4 Mull have I ronds. 1lo4 h untll June, I Samples of

# - only berruen 

### - Frldoy, tor r 

### ProCroup 

### , I 4FFORDAMLE HYPNOSIS lor )hobIos. smoklnp, wclpht conlrol, ,ell nlollvallon, speed learlllnp. 175-4410. roslrlcllons.

Thlsl61h day of February. 1985. llobarl L. Brown Sults 1M. Dome Bulldlnp Ive publlc commenl concern. ~ropowd revlllonslothe Tan. ee Alr Pollutlon Control royu. 11%and the Slate ImDlemenls. Plan. At thls hrnrlnu, IIw wln" wlll beconsidered: 73.4Gaorpla Avenue Chatlanoopa, Tannerwe 37402 1615)7YrAl54 U.S. DEPARTMEMT OF JUSTICE, Unlred Stalos Marshals Sorvlca. NOTICE OF U.S. MARSHAL'S :ALE (Real Eltnlol. Unlled Stales of Amorlca Easlcrn Dlslrlct ol Tnnncssec. Publlc nollce Is hcroby

Iven, that by vlrtuo 01 Order ICR /-US-91, dbled January 18. A.0. 1985. Isluall oul of the Dlltrlct Court, 01 the Unlted Stares lor the EaltcrnDlrtrlcl04 Tenne~lee on n ludpmanl rendered Inrald Court. on Ilw lmh day of January. A.D. tV8S. Intsvor of The Unlled Stales 01 Amerlca and agalnrl Jullul E. Parker. I havo. on thll 5th day of February, A.D. 1985, levled upon the following described par%onal property, slluated In the County/ Psrlsh ol Hamilton and State of Tenneslee, towll: IA)One (1) 1963 Trophy Moblle Home Trailer, Its turnlshln~ and fixtures, 10 X 51 VIN rrSlX11SV. Locatlon: 1M Summers Drlve. Soddy Dalsy. Tennes1cc. IUIOne II) 1769 Arlcrafl Mobile Home Trsller. lts furnlshlnpr and llxlurrs, two bodroom, 17 X 60. VIN nACGY11A. Locatlon: 5934 Old Dayton Plke. Chatlnnoogo, Tonnessoc. I wlll, accordlnoly, ofAPRIL wlll love you lorever h a day. -ov. D.J. \TTEHTIOH Rlto Kobertr, Styllll >a%lolned the staff at Lorna's ialonon South Broad St. Wc lnvllc >erclientele locall-lbb1761.

LOSE WEIGHT FEELGREAT IWX money back uaurant*. 96703 PREOUANT) NEED HELP? WO Carel UclhanybR-7WJ. Prepnnncy teltlnp 6 confldenllal counlellnp. Unplannrd Pr+l)nancy, pregnancy tellln~, blrth control lervlcal. 11. cen,ed by the Stale 01 Tennessee 899-lb37, Chnltanoops Women'l Cllnlcb1NVancc Rd., Chalt.. Tn. \mcndments lo Fossll Fue! <I Sleam Generntors. rnendmentl lo Lead Emlsslon dnrdl. mendmen11toAutomobllc nnd 11 DulyTruck Jurlacc Coallny nr.clow.L TIU~POUTATION AUTHORITY Take notlce punuant lo Chaplar 441. Tcnnssseo Publlc ACIr 01 1974. the Sunlhlne Law, that the Donrd 01 Dlractorr 01 the Chnllanoopa Area Rsglonal Trbnsportallon Aulhorlty wlll convenu and meet In regular open sel%lon on Thursday mornlnp, March 11, 1985, at 10 a)A.M., DayIlphl Savlhps Tlme, In the Uoard Room, Chaltanoopa Ares Roplonal Transportallon Aulhorlty, 1617 Wllcox Roulevard, Challnnooga, rallons. dew rules regardlnp Equip. #I

Leak%of Volntllc Orpanlc \pounds In Petrolauln Kellner. Reflrlnp, HIh ~rrt~~c ~rea. Free Slandlnp Bu?ldlng. Call M111 SHOE STORE-ln mall tom, near Chatlanoopa. Dolnp blp bualnesr. prolltable. colt4 LAUNDRY-VeVyclean, good equlpmenl 6 locallon. lcw rules repardlnp Flexlble ,I and Urellmne Cosllnp and 'linp. nw rules repardlnp Petroleum Cleaners. Icwrules regarding Phosphale h Planlr. :~cluslon 01 lell'methods 18. 21, 7J. and 11 In New Source Per. mncc Standard1 lor delerml. ion 01 certaln alr pollutanls. c.vlsio11 to SIP tor Melropolllan ~.nvIlleand Davldlon County n rcpardlnq nonatlainment lor !)on monoride. :epeal 01 Chaplor 17, Adminla. live Procedures. Inland Conlalnrr Corporallon . ,quest (Or reoulnlory rellel lrom Tralnlnp Pr* Jobs. Bonel all lhlltl

Services & 

# PFlLirs

AAA SEWER L DRAIN SERVICE Plumblnp repairs. Don Granl Low prlml. Ul-2404. ATTICS. BASEMEUTS 6 GA. RAGES cleaned for what youdon'l wanl. 691-1158bdore 10A.M. CENTURIES HOME REPAIR d REMODELIMC NO lobI00brpe01 too smsll. tree e%llmatel, tlnanc Inp, Tony orJlm, B94-3672 M1.PIOP CLEAN HoMes MON L TUE~ ttwy 5e b Harrison Area. Exwrl enced. Ralerencel. 344-3144 P.M.

CLEA#I)CO HomerA Yardwork vape plus 91dlW belw 4TTENTIOI rlred of ml ienl your o ,alonwllh po e Brldper B1 Tennesace, where and nl which time and plsce rald Board ot Dlrectors wlll transacl such publlc buslnosl as mny lawfully come be- fore It. W. Arnold ChbmberS Chalrrnsn. CARTA Board 01 Dlrector5 

# -- SECT~~~ m10 INVITATIOMTO BID The Chaltanoopa-Harnlllon 'County Hospltal Authorlty (owner) wlll recelve sealed lump sum propsa11 lrom quallflcd, llcenurd contramors for rIIlabor nnd materiels to completn the work In nccordance wllh the ''Contract Uocumcnts" cnlltlad RENOVATION FOR FOURTH FLOOR CENTRAL WING AND FOURTH FLOOR WEST WING as prepared by Franklln Dellpn Group, Inc., 615 Llndaay Strocl, Chaltanoopa. Tennessee 37M. PRE-BID CONFERENCE: APRIL 11, 1985 AT 7:00 P.M. ESDT, THOMPSON ROOM, EKLANGER MEDICAL CENTER. BIDS WILL OE RECEIVED unlll 2:GU P.M. EDST, APRIL 25, It05 In the THOMPSON ROOM, ERLANGEll MEDICAL CENTER. at whlch Ilme all blds wlll ba openod publlcly nnd madaloud. DRAWINGS AND Sl'FClFlCATIONS may ba rfflored on thls work at the olflceof fh* ArChltsCt, the Uultders ExcMnpc In Chahanoops and Knorvllle, tho Oodpe olllcsr In Chattanooon. Atlanla and Knoxvllla, and tha AGCWen room InChattanoapa. DEPOSITS AND REMUNERA- TIONS TOBUYor Sella Bullnera Call 

### BUSINESS 

### BROKER ASSOCIATES 7Y7W

## - Zq HRI. t 1 1 prrtlculaie %laridsrd whon nlng ammonlum sulllte %pent ,or (heavy spent Ilquor) in ,d refuae bnller~ ameridments lo Non-ProcOs~ ~llalon Stsndarda, New Fuel rnlnp Equlprnent. Reclaarlllcallon 01 Porllons of .nne Counly lrom Unclaasltled Allslnm4nl for Sullur Dlorlds.l Uevlrlon lo Holalon Army Am- ,nlllon's perm11 lo open burn ploalve waslo anderploLlvP connlnaledwaste.

New Chapter to repulatlonr, XF7.73, Vl~lblllly Protecllon and loclaled non-regulatory SIP ,,rndmenls. Arnenonwnlr to vltlblo clnll- .ni standard,, E~empllons and clhoor ol Eraluallon and ,!cordlnp, and various chnrogc,

Itbe vlslble emlarion readlnu fer ssld personal propsrty,~to the hlphcst and ball bidder, by certlfled check. Bldderl mull submll lhelr olferr In wrlllnp to the US Marshall Scrvlce, P.O. Box 551, Knoxvlllu. Th' 37901. OIlers racalvad rllh a postmark lntar than 11 Mldnlphl. March 22, 1985, wlll not bosccepted. Sublecltothe .tollowlnp lerms snd candlllona: The above aald prowrly Is lo be sold nl IL and mull be removod fromthelr present locatlon at Ourchaser's own axpense wlthln tan (101 days after racelvlnp conllrmallon01 aalo. Both moblle homos can be vlewed on locallori by con, lsclln~ Ihc U.S. ~orlhal. Chatla. noogo Dlrl%lon,615-161-UM. The Unllnd Slate, ofAmarlca rewrvcl the rlphl to apeclflcally rrlcct or accept any and all bldl rmcalved. Oslod, Frlday, February llrld. A.D. 1985 UllUCE R. MONTGOMERY US.Warshal Eastern Dlslrlct01 Tannaawa My hhnG Tntum Chlel Dupuly JAMES R. DEDRICK Unllrd S1st.a Attorn4y t i t CARAT DIAMOMD RING 14K

nplowork. erencea. AP Ex~erlenced. Rearonable Rate%. Prebul. PREBULA 3HO FII Freeestlmsles, 861-7111. CONCRETE, BRICK, BLOCK h ROCK WORK. PATIO5
CUSTOM PICTURE FRAMING d Mattlng 1649 Marwrll St., Col Graoy OurhnmW-Wlattsr 4.Y) GARD~NS TILLED. plowad, bust ho ad plvs yards tev.Ied. Reorom ab?c rates.MI- ask. tor Bob. LAWN CARE: Cunlne frlmmln plonllnp. Free eatlrnales. 

### 2
MCCOY 931-nn. uWMSIRVICE We cul h lrln 6 plan1 6 dlp h ckan W. Arl do~endabl~ pmldcall67444U. - ODD JOBS reaaonabla A rellabM BABY S1-n home 5 day1 references. BABY SIT Rldge, Ueh old, 3 pm.4 BAKERY LlakerlDow bakary In ; community Allonla. Cm 

### NEED 

### MONEY?

1 ~tyouawna home ad have a lob wm can help. t alhod.

Amendments to Chapter on mllr on Emllllonl duc to mal- ~ncllons.alart-ups, and shutCREDIT7NO PROBLEM1 85-1 CIIICDUMDIIB. INC. ,rnl, RepomRequlrad. Rsvlrlons to Chapter 19. N0nr.l- ,lnrnent Areas. tor orowth In

# 1

~ ~ -. The Mortpa~e People

>OK areas. Am.ndrnsnfs lo Chapter on Reulred Sampllno, Racordlnp, and

# I Jlm man. BEAUTICIA 

# 11 

# Q3

# I Auctions . ' palntlnp, root rspalr~. ratarprwt Inp 6 carpentry, 877-1703. ROOFIHG. SIDIMC, GUTTERIUC Tlltonls 

### , Mlon. Worl mayrent sl e1B7WIM I



### BEBW I Plcssr co tor llnal N I Ill 4. B MECHN IlM bowllr rnechsnlca wn: 9A.M. LaFay



### BO Full cMrg renorlr. RI snllor and BKP. BOX 

### 50 Non-proll? ence book1 Onances. computer Sand reru vqulrsd.

~ 1 Amendmantlto Chapter on haz-I GENFIRAL CWTRACTORS AND MAJOR SUBCONTRACTORS may oblaln one re1 01 blddlnp documenla from tho Archllect on depolll ot Fllty 15kl.00) dollars. A written ap@\callonlor documents tooether wlth the depolll mull ba flled promptly wllh rheArChllaCI. MAJOR SUBCONTRACTORS tor rec-lpl of bid documenl purposes only arc daflned as: Mcchsnlcsl, Eleclrlcal Plumblnp. Sprlnklerr GENERAL CONTRACTORS may clbtaln addltlonal Complete wts 01 clocuments: Ueposll lor each addiIlona1 set shall be made In two check1 01 115.0 *nth. One chet* wlll hc refundrd wrlon plan1 and apcclllcnllons rra returned lo the Architccl ln good condlllon, and ?he rclnalnln~ check wlll be relalncd by the Archllccl to cover prlnllnpcusla, JOINT-U:DDING: When two Qenera1 rontractorr acl joantly to rubmllme bld In lolnl venture1 then Iheyw!ll LK. Ironleda1a alnpla bid-

. .. . , ~ - rdous Alr ~onlsrn1n~'nl~. Mercu- 

### I I Y. RrvlrlonaloChapter 9. Oro*rth, 'OII~V. AUCTIONTONIGHT! C8max 19

## rlAnmICA BEBOP CAFE 5801 BRAINERD RD W. m LDLlng kr 0 C.rr mmvjati pop*, wh. murru .nrrld.Ap plations m bekg )oLm tw wok A -, b-n'iw, bdm& vale! porting at?m&nh on THURSDAY 6 FRIDAY BFTWN 2 6 4 PM. Apply in p.non 0Jc tor Chorbt(eGq.

I AII work Guaranteed. Inlured ~lllson-Crum '1676177, W4-YIW. SMALL ENGINE REPAIRWe do h 4 cycle enplns L air tool1 6'28-3738or 344-2379. UPHOLSTCRY, quallly work. ras sonable prlcer, your malerlal o ours, free elllmalel. bS-MO36 .Addltlanto Chapter lo1 the dell WESTSIDE AUCTION ~ltlon of nonarlnlnmenl areel.

r. Mlnor rovi.lans to ChaDlurl 3. 

### ,"Rr~~~.r:~.^,':;pl~P~'~!~:.

'. Ond repsrdlnp Panialerlalr: Lor101 brlc-a-brack onlrol areal.

,, to Chapter and small ltarnl -1 well as French ,OC cmlaaion slandardl, chnnp Prov1ncle.l bed room proup. other ng the compllancr dclermlnnllon vroupr' 1v30'r aIculallon lecnnlquc and adding Ol"et'e

I--.,

oel~hltlon of "complying coal- 

### ~,"~~~n~~jn~oI:"",;"o~~",~e~,"O~ 'HE 

### CLUH BRSEMENTS

### t ATTICS 570, IM,6 140.75&4l7P.
"B .

, lo )*elhod, dresserr. llvlnO room furnlturc. 'Zero Percenl Dpaclty". rlrnollEv.rym,~l~r everythlrt Iha homc. ekrurul r Amrndmentl 10 Chapter lo lh- TERM~:C~S~ ONLY chchs) lude vlslblllty proloctton raqulre- AuCtlonaer: ,.,llkcrson nrntc I A aomen OPPORTUWTIY Mnke mvney In your %Poretlml Joln frlendly home toy partles, th hs6er tor 30 year. Ownlnpa 1c monsperl and deaters.. We her the Iatpclt an1 bast llne In par1 DI-n. Earn blo munev vlu - CITY -Nalhvlllc

. W. ~ivo Hsndh Estalss

. DATE- Aprll 18, 1985 ' tcwwprvred lo Uuy) TIME

### - ?:XI a.m., Cmnrrnl PLACE- 

# I-- ..R'NC;.C;.?!,? 

## ,*?G 

## FT!%!!I?.lprice

. n. ,herebv given pat Ihe- Tennessee Air

ollution Conlrol Board -w~ll hold a Dublic hearing. The purwse of lhis hear- :trig is lo: receive public -comment concerning -proposed revisions lo Ihe -Tennessee Air Pollution -€onl[ol -r;cgulalions and :the, Slale lmplernenlation .Plan. At'this hearing, :he lonowing will be consid- -ered:

. ' -3. Amendmenls lo Fossil -Ewe1 Eired Sleam Gener- -ators -

. 

### a. Amendmenls lo Lead IEmiuion.~landards Arnencmenls lo Aulo- 

### 4. '. mcblle and Livhl Duly ?ruck Sljrfacc Coaling Doeralions - ..d...New rules regarding :J~ii~ment Leaks of Volal~le 

## -Organic Com~ounds :n, Pelroleurn Re!ineries --c. New - rules rewarding ,Flexible Vjnvl and Ureihne COaliw and Printing 

# 8. New - rules regarding -Pelroleurn Drv Cleeners -0. -New rules regarding 

# -Rhowhale Rock Planls

-.Inclusion ot lest melhbds 18, 21, 22, 21, and 25 -in Sew -Source Perlor- -nance Standards for Idelec~ninationof certain ..air ~ollulions. -i. Revision to SIP for .Melro~olilan Nashille and -Davidson Counlv area Zrec~rding.nonaltainment -for' carbon monoxide. -j. Repeal of Chapter 17, --Admin~slra:ive Proce- -dures 'lk.

. . Inland .Conlainer Cor- ,poration~Requesl for -~e9ulalofv relief from Ihe Lparliculale standard when ~u:ining.ammonium sulfile .&Dent liquor (heavv soen1 -4auor) in wood refuse ,doilers.. 

### - :I. Arne~idmenls lo Non- --Process .Emission SlanSards, N6w Fuel Burning 4cui~rnent 

## m. Reclassificallon of PorJions. of 

## .Roane Counlv -.from. Unclassified lo -Attainmen1 for Sulfur 'Dioxide.

. zn.. Revision lo ~oiston ->rmv Ammuni:ion's per- -mil to open burn explosive -WaSle and ex~losive con- :-laminaled. waste, ;-0. New Xhaoler lo regu- -!alions, 3200-3-23. Visibil- -jlv

, Proleclion and a,$o- --cialed noh-regulalorv SIP -amendmenls. P.Amendments lo visible .:emissidns standards, 

# - Exemptions and Methods -if Evaluation and Record- %ing, and various changes =in Ihe
.~isible emission Jreadhmethod. -:q.. Amendments lo Chap- -.!er on Limits on Emi- -.ssions due lo malfun- :clions,
. start-uos, and -shuldcrwns, Reports

, Rewired.

...r. Revisions la Cha~ler 19,

.- Nonallainmenl Areas, lor 'growlh in lhose areas ;I. Amendmenls lo Chapler 

## - on Rcauired Sam~ling, 2 - ler 18. VOC emission slandards. chan~ing Ihe comoliance delerminalion calculalion lcchnicue and adding a definition of "comDlving coaling". v. Anendmenl lo TVEE Melhod 3 "Zero Percenl O~acilv" z. Amendmenls lo Cha~ter 9 lo include visibilitv proleclion recuiremenls. The hearing will be held as :otlo;vs: City Dale Tine Place Nashville ADril 18. 1985 9-30 am., Central TCU, Downlown 10th ?. Charlolle Room 270 The hearing is being held Pursuant lo Seclion 66-25-108 of the Tennessee Air Qualilv Acl in accor- dance wilh Ihe provisions in Ihe Tennessee Uniform Adminislralive Procedures Pcl. T.C.A. 4-5-20? el. sea. and Ihe Federal Clean Air Act as amended. Rules considered at lhis hearing mav be adopled bv !he Tennessee Air Pollulion Control Board urder T.C.A. 68-25-105. Ihe eoard's veneral aulhor~lvlo promulsale rules. Malerials concerning lhese prooosed additions andlor revisions will be available for Public ins~eciionduring normal working hours slarting on March 18, 1985 at the following tocalions: ' Ajr Pollulion Conlrol Divluon ~ERRABu~lding, 6th Floor 150 91h Avenue, tJcrlh Nashwlle. TN 27219-5604 KinWsDort Publ~c L~brarv 4DD eroad Slreel Klnws~ort, Tennessee 37060 Ai;-Po~~u~ion Control Division Jackson Regional Office 295 Summar Avenue Jackson, Tennessee 3301 Air Pollution Control Div: i~inn Ciikeville Regional Office P.O. Box 5033 Tennessee Tech Univer-

o.,

## . Cookeville, Tennessee 38501 Division of Air Pollulion Conlrol J

### 110 Legals Columbia Regional Office MI. Pleasant Pike Columbia, Tennessee 38401 All persons inleresled in the air oualitv of the slale

Mern~his-Shelbv Counlv Health Depl. of Tennessee are urged lo allend and will be afforded the. oooorlun~lv lo Present leslimonv lo !he hearing officer regarding lhese proposed addilions lo Ihe Slale IrnDIementalion Plan. Anv Derson desiring to presenl lenwlhv comments should be DreDared a1 Ihe hearing lo oHer a wrillen slatemenl to be incoreoraled into !he record. \Yrillen slatements not presented at Ihe hearing will on!v be considered oar! of the record it received bv :X o.m. April 19 1561 a1 the 

### oifi;e of 

### Ihd Technical Sccrelarv. Ten- nessee Air Pollulion ConIrol Board, TERRA Building, 6lh Floor, 1% 91h Avcnue NO TI^. N~~~~~II~, Tenne:see 27219-5:OL as APC-2 (44677501

.-. -..

914 Jefferson Avenue Memphis, Tennessee 38105 Air Pollulion Conlrol Div

## AFFIDAVIT OF

## PUBLICATION STATE

## OFTENNESSEE 

## COUNTYOF

## DAWSON


## L Wdlim 

### Wmb. Crdth'hnaget 

### of the 

### Newspaper 

### Printing Corporation 

### Agmt for the 

### Publisher of the

### Nashville Banner

### and thePublisher 

### of

### The Tennesgean ddy Newspapers 

### in the 

### afwcsaid Shtc 

### and COLL~~?~, hereby chfythat the attached 

### mntappear& in

ision the

### Nashvri!e Banner



### . 

## . . . . . . 

## . . . 

## . . - 

### .

## -.

Johnson City Regional Otfice 1233 Soulhwest Avenue Exlension johnson Cily, Tennessee 37601 Air Pollulion Conlrol Division Challanooga Regional Olfice 2501 Milne Avenue Challanooga. Tennessee 

### TheTennessean



## . . . March

# L.YA

Sub3xd

### zn sworn to before 

### me. 

# Y
this 27th March day of 

# -Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation, Division of Air Pollution, Rule Chapter 1200-3-23, filed September 21, 1988, effecLive November 6, 1988, which remains in effect pursuant to T.C.A. Section 4-5-207 at the time of this certification not having been repealed by the Tennessee DeparLment of Environment and ConservationAIR POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD OF THE STATE OF TENNESSEE

IN THE MATTER OF:
ADOPTION OF THE
NOKRE63LATORY PORTION
OP THE S.I.P. X X ORDER NO. 

### - 

# 3 

# 95

X

BOARD ORDER

The Board hereby adopts amendments to the Implementation Plan of the Siate of Tennessee for meeting the ambient air quality standards in the rnles and regulations OF the State of Tennessee. This includes the addition of Section 2.16 Visjbility Protection.I Signature of the agency officer or officers directly responsible for proposing and/or drafting these ru1e.s : 

# d&,&/. & Harold E. ~odgks, Director 

### fl Tennessee Air Pollution Control Division

A roll-call vote of the Tennessee Air Pollution Control Board on these rulemaking hearing rules was as follows:
No Abstain

Tony A. Duncan



# Cfc&3?/h& Robert C. Bums :

. 

### I certify that this 

### is 

### an accurate and complete copy 

### of rulemaking hearing 

# 4' rules, lawfully promulgated and adopted by the Tennessee Air Pollution Control



## . Board 

### on the 

### 35 day of 

### &p~mdm 9 

### 19s-

### Legal Notice
Notice is hereby given that the Tennessee Air Pollution Control Board will hold a public hearing. The purpose of this hearing is to receive public comment concerning proposed revisions to the Tennessee Air Pollution Control regulations and the State Irnplernentation Plan. At this hearing, the following will be considered:Amendments toFossil FuelFired Steam Generators Amendments toLeadEmission Standards Amendments to Autornobile and Light Duty Truck Surface Coating Operations
New rules regarding Equipment Leaksof Volatile Organic Compounds in Petroleum Refineries New rules regarding Flexible Vinyl and Urethane Coatingand Printing New rules regardingPetroleum Dry Cleaners
New rules regarding Phosphate Rock Plants Inclusion of test methods 18, 21, 22, 24, 

### and 25 in New Source Performance Standardsfor determination of certain airpollutants. Revision to SIP for Metropolitan Nashville and Davidson County area regarding nonattainment for carbon monoxide. Repealof Chapter 17, Administrative Procedures 

### 1
Inland Container Corporation 

## - Request for regulatory relief from the particulate standard when burning ammonium sulfite spent liquor (heavy spent liquor) in wood refuse boilers. Amendments to Non-Process Emission Standards, New Fuel Burning Equipment Reclassification of Portions of Roane County from Unclassified to Attainment forSulfur Dioxide Revision to Holston Army Ammunition's permit to open burn explosive waste and explosive contaminated waste. New Chapter to regulations, 1200-3-23, Visibility Protection and associated non-regulatory SIPamendments.
Amendments tovisible emissions standards, Exemptions and Methods of Evaluation and Recording, and various changes in the visible ernission reading m thod. Amendments to Chapter on Limits on Emissions due to malfunctions, start-ups, and shutdowns, Reports Required Revisions to Chapter 19, Nonattainrnent Areas, for growth in those areas Amendments to Chapter on Required Sampling, Recording, and

### AIR POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD OF THE STATE OFTENNESSEE

REGULAR MEETING
On Thursday, May 30, 1955, the Air Pollution Control Board of the State of Tennessee, hereinafter referred to as the Board held its regular rnecting in Room 31 of the Legislative Plaza, Nashville, Tennessee.
The following seven 

### (7)Board members were present:

, . 

### Mr. Richard Bolton Judge Tony A. Duncan Mr. 

### J. C. Edwards Dr. D. M. Gossett Dr. Albert Iglar Mrs. Barbara Sonnenburg Mr. Howard Sigler
Since the Chairman, James 

### E. Word, could not attcnd thc mecting, Mr. Wayne 

### E. Cantrell represented the Chairman by proxy. Mr. Charles Brown, State Planning Office, represented Mr. Lee Munz by proxy. Othcrs present includcd Mr. John 

### W. Walton, Acting Technical Secretary to the Board, and Mr. David Harbin, State

### Attorney.
The following four 

### (4) Board membcrs were absent:
Mr. Lee Munz Dr. Karl Schnelle Dr. Sharlinda Turner Mr. James E. Word
The Vice Chairman, Dr. Gossett, called the meeting to order at 

### 9:30 a.m. The first item on the agenda was Approval of Minutes of the Previous Meeting. Mrs. Sonnenburg made a 

### motion that the minutesbe approved. Mr. Cantrell secondcd the motion. Motion carried. There were nine (9) 

### affirmative votes. The next item on the agenda was New Source Performance Standards. The Vice Chairman called upon Mr. John Patton, Air Resources Program, Division of Air Pollution Control, Department of Health and Environment, to discuss these items. Mr. Patton explained that this item included amendments and additions to Chapter 1200-3-16, and that all matters under this topic, with the exception of 1200-3-16-.21, had been taken to public hearing on April 13, 1985.
Mr. Patton began by addressing amendments to Rule 1200-3-16-.02, Fossil Fuel Fired Steam Generators. Mr. Patton briefly reviewed comments received at the public hearing on this item and the staff response to these comments. Mr. IJatton recommended approval of the amendments.

### The next item on the agenda was Amendment to Chapter 1200-3-11, I-lazardous Air Contaminants. The Vice Chairman called upon Mr. Barry 

### R. Stephens, 

### P.E., Chief, Air Resources Program, Division of Air Pollution Control, Department of Health and Environment, to address this item. Mr. Stephens briefly reviewed comments received at the April 18, 1935 public hearing on the matter and noted that due to a comment received atthehearing, the language had been clarified to provide an alternate method of determining compliance by the use of sludge sampling.
Mr. Bolton made a motion that the Board.approve the amendment to Chapter 1200-3-11, Hazardous Air Contaminants. Dr. Iglar seconded the motion. TheVice Chairman called for a roll callvote. Sonnenburg yes. Duncan Yes Edwards Yes Brown Yes Gossett Yes
Motion carried. There were nine 

### (9) affirmative votes. Bolton Yes Cantrell yes Igla r Yes Sigler Yes

The next item on the agenda was Visibility Protection Requirements. The Vice Chairman called upon Mrs. Heather Whitlow Air Resources Program, Division of Air Pollution Control, Department of Health and Environment to discuss this matter. Mrs. \Vhitiow informed the Board that this item was revisions to the StateImplementation Plan (SIP) for visibility protection in Federal Class I areas. Mrs. Whitlow briefly outlined the provisions of proposed Chapter 1200-3-23, Visibility Protection, and reviewed comments received at the April 18, 1985 public hearing and the State's response to these comments. Mr. Sigler made a 

### motion that the Board adopt Chapter 1200-3-23, Visibility Protection. Mr. Cantrell seconded the motion. The Vice Chairman called for a roll call vote. Sonnenburg Yes Duncan Yes Edwards yes Brown yes Gossett Yes Bolton Yes Cantrell yes Iglar Yes Sigler Yes

Motion carried. There were nine (9) affirmative votes. Next, Mrs. Whitlow proceeded to discuss Section 2.16, the nonregulatory portion of the SIP for visibility protection. Mrs. Whitlow briefly reviewed the contents of thenonregulatory material and noted that itidentified the Federal Class I areas in Tennessee and also addressed various methods to determine its existence and the extent of visibility impairment. Mrs. Whitlow addressed comments received at the April 18, 1985 public hearing and advised members of the Board of the revisions that had 

### been incorporated asa resultof thepublic hearing.
Mr. Bolton made a rnotion that the Board approve the addition of Section 2.16, Visibility Protection, to the SIP. Mr. Cantrell seconded the motion. The Vice Chairman called for a roll call vote. Sonnenbu

### rg absent Duncan Yes rd.,,-,-Ar .-nr 

### Bolton Yes Cantrell yes

I1

## omm missioner Word had commented recently on the good relationship which existed between the staff and the Board and Mr. Cantrell expressed his appreciation for this effort. Next, Mr. Cantrell stated that it ,was planned to create

### a room in the 

## TERRA Building forthe purpose of conducting Board mectingsfor the Department.
At this time. Mr. David Harbin informed the Board that the General Smelting appeal was tentatively scheduled for September 10'and 

### 11, 1985.
There being no furtherbusiness, the meetins wasdeclared adjourned.
( 

### gned) John W. 

### Walton, 

### P.E. 

# *

3- 

# wa Acting Teclinical secretary Tennessee Air Pollution Control Board

lsigned 

# +?!- Harold Hodgcs, 

### P.E.

Approved at Nashville, Tennessec on I I \ 

### ~echnical Secretary TennessecAir Pollution Control Board

~einessee Air poilution ControlBoard

Tennessee Air Pollution Control Board

### Signature of the agency officer or officers directly responsible for proposing and/or drafting these ru1e.s: 

# u&,-
Harold 

### E. ~odg&s, Director 

### fl Tennessee Air 

### Pollution Control Division

A 

### roll-call vote of the Tennessee Air 

### Pollution Control Board on these rulemaking hearing rules was as follows:

Tony A. 

### Duncan Abstain



### /'- 

## - 

# /- &-kc&~&-

. Robert C. 

### Burns 

### ' 

# J 

# l+$L.\ ,b Jam4 R. 

### Sheller

. 

### I certify that this 

### is an accurate and complete copy of rulemaking hearing

rules, lawfully promulgated and adopted by the Tennessee Air 

### Pollution Control 

# '@ Bonrd on the -)

## +& day of 

### kp~mdm , 19i-g

### RULES OF TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT BUREAU OF ENVIRONMENT DIVISION OF AIR POLLUTION CONTROL
CHAPTER 1200-3-23 VISIBILITY PROTECTION

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Purpose Definitions General Visibility Protection Standards Specific Emission Standards for Existing Stationary Facilities Specific Emission Standards for Existing Sources Visibility Standards for New and Modified Sources Visibility Monitoring Requirements Exemptions from BART Requirements
PURPOSE
The purpose of this Chapter is to assure reasonable progress toward meeting the goal of preventing any future, and remedying any existing impairment of visibility in mandatory Class 

### I Federal areas in which impairment results from man-made air pollution. Statutory Authority: T.C.A. Section 68-25-105 and 4-5-202. Administrative History. Original Rule certified November 6, 

### 1988.
1200-3-23-.02 DEFINITIONS
Unless specifically defined in this Chapter, the definitions from Chapter 1200-3-2 and Paragraph 1200-3-9-.01(4) shall apply: (1) "Best 

### Available Retrofit Technology (BART)" means an emission limitation based on the degree of reduction achievable through the application of the best system of continuous emission reduction for each pollutant which is emitted by an existing stationary facility. The emission limitation must be established, on a 

### case-by-case basis, taking into consideration the technology available, the costs of compliance, the energy and nonair quality environmental impacts of compliance, any pollution control equipment in use or in existence at the source, the remaining useful life of the source, and the degree of improvement in visibility which may reasonably be anticipated to result from the use of such technology.2.16 Visibility Protection

### Visibility SIP
Visibility is commonly referred to as 

### the relative ease with which objects can be seen through the atmosphere under various conditions. Visibility impairment can be classified into two general types. The first type results from smoke, dust or other gaseous emissions from 

### a discernable sourceorsources which obscure the sky or horizon. The second type is the widespread, regionally homogeneous haze from many sources which reduces visibility in every direction over a large area. (See Appendix A) TheFederal Class I areas in Tennessee that may be affected by visible impairment include: Great Smoky hlountains National Park and Joyce Kilmcr-Slickrock National Wilderness Area. In order to determine the existence and extent of visibility impairment in these areas a visibility impact study must be conducted. This study could include monitoring techniques such as human observation, photographic records, quantified photographic records and quantified photographic records with pollutant identification. (See Appendix B) These monitoring techniques can be used to obtain background visibility data, to analyze visibility trendsand provide data fornew sourceimpactanalysis. The Tennessee approach to visibility contr'ol includes the adoption of procedural requirements of 40 

### CFR 52.21 aspart of the prevention of significantdeterioration regulation and the adoption of 40 

### CFR 

### 52.28 

### as part of the non-attainment area growth policy. It is also our intent to coordinate a monitoring strategy in cooperation with the National Park Services (NPS), the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) and the Environmental Protection Agency 

### (EPA), involving quantified photographic records with pollutant identification in the Great Smoky Mountain National Park. (See Appendix C) 

### The Federal Land Manager (FLM) and the Director of the Tennessee Air Pollution Control Division (Director) will be responsible for determining whether any impairment of visibility exists in any mandatory Class I Federal area. For any existing visibility impairment that the Director identifies or the FLM certifies to the Director, the Air Pollution Control Division (Division) will determine if visibility impairment in any Class 

### I Federal area is reasonably attributable to an existing stationary facility through visual observation or any other technique the Director deemsappropriate. TheFLM may assist the Division by providing a 

### list of sources suspected of causing or contributing tovisibility impairmentin theFederal Class I 

### area. The Division will also perform a Best Available Retrofit Technology (BART) analysis on any existing facilities identified as impairing visibility to identify the pollutant of concern and evaluate additional air pollution control technologies that may improve visibility. If BART would not result in a significant visibility improvement, the source may not be required toinstall BART. A 

### periodic reeaxamination of Class I areas to identify any sources that may contribute to visibility impairment in the future will be performed and when new technology becomes available, such sourcesmustbe reanalyzed for BART.
At this time, there are not any sources requiring BART because the Director nor the 

### FLM have identified any sources which are causing existing visiblity impairment in any Class 

### I area. However, the FLM or the Director may at any time determine that visibility impairment exists and recommend that the conditions be remedied. If an existing source is subjected to a BART analysis in

### the future, the existing source may apply to the Technical Secretary 

### of the Tennessee Air Pollution Control i3oard foran exemption from BART on the basis that the source does not cause orcontribute tosignificant impairment of visibility. The source must also notify the FLM of itsapplication. Visibility may be evaluated by human observers, or inspection of data from visibility monitoring stations, or by any technique determined appropriate by the Division. Historical and baseline visibility data determined appropriate by the Division may beused to 

### support decisionsrelevant totheVisibility Plan.
A 

### long-term (10 

### - 15years) strategy to fully comply with theVisibility Plan will be designed to prevent future visibility impairrnent due to identifiable stationary sources developing near or impacting on Federal Class I 

### areas. The strategy will consistof the following: I) An analysis of visibility impacts by all new stationary sources which might impairvisibility in a ClassI 

### area, irrespective of their proposed location. If the new source is not subject to Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) provisions, the Division may consider cost, energy and other relevant factors in determining whether topermit construction of a new source. For new sources which are exempt from PSD regulations and -could cause a reduction in visibility, severaloptions areavailable forconsiderationsby the Division and the source. The Division could 1)require the source to analyze alternative sites, 2) require the use of BestAvailable ControlTechnology 3) limit the source's capability to 

### emitthepollutant which is expected to 

### cause the impairment by limiting the source's operating conditions, or4) deny the sourcepermission toconstruct. 2) The Division will review this strategy in consultation with the FLM and report the findings to the public and to the Administrator of the 

### EPA 

### at least every three years. 3) The periodic review of the long term visibility strategy will be undertaken to a)takeinto account advances in technology, b) evaluate progress toward the "national" visibility goal, c) evaluate specific program effectiveness, d) consider any new or identified integral vistas, e) evaluate the reasonableness of the long term strategy. Included in these analyses will be an assessment of progress in remedying any identified impairment, an assessment of the strategy's long-term 

### ability toprevent future impairment 

### and identification of advances in technology and' consideration of additional measures that may be necessary to make reasonable progress toward the national visibility goal. This review will incorporate any.evaluations of available visual observations ormonitoring data orother documentation. Theplan incorporates the control of airpollutantsof new sourcesimpacting any Class 

### I area thus preserving thevisibility goals for these areas. When the Division reviews applications for new sources which may impact Class I 

### areas, the Division will work closely with the FLM. As a first step in the review process, the Division will notify the FLM of preapplication meetings or other correspondence from any potential new source which may impact visibility in 

### a Class

### I area. The Division and FLM will then initiate consultation concerning such issues 

### as application completeness determinations which will continue throughout the permitting process. The

### FLM will have

### at least 30 days after their receipt 

### of a

### complete application to make a visibility analysis. The FLhl 

### may demonstrate to 

### the Director that the source will havean adverse impact on visibility in the Class I area even where the PSD increments are not violated. If the Division agrees with the assessment, then the permit will be denied. If the Divisiondisagrees with the assessment, it will provide written explanation of its findings to 

### be made available tothe public prior to 

### public hearings on the permit.
In addition, analysis of the potential visibility impacts of new sources on integral vistas identified at least 12 months before submission of a 

### complete permit application shall be made. However, if the 

### FLM provides anopportunity for public comment on any potential integral vista at 

### least 

### 6 months prior to 

### submission of the complete permit application, the analysis must include the impact on the potential integral vistas as well. The protection 

### of integral vistas will include consideration of 

### the long-terrn strategy including cost, energy and other rele,~ant factors. Finally, the Division may require the source to 

### monitor visibility at 

### the proposed site or 

### potentially aflected area

### aspart of the permit ap?lication.

### Appendix '4 

### Visibility 

### - Discussion

The term visibility refers to the clarity of objects seen by an observer looking through the atmosphere. This term refers only to the factors that influence visibility independent of the vision of the observer. Visibility is different from most measures of atmospheric air quality because it is a path measurement influenced by a variety of factors. Visibility is affected by air pollutants of many types, both gaseous and particulate, as well asby natural phenomena such 

### as fog, rain and clouds. The interaction of natural and man-made factors can result in synergistic impactsonvisibility. While the number of different factors affecting visibility are many, there are two mechanismsby which these factorsactually reducevisibility. The two mechanisms are light scattering and light absorption. The pollutants of primary concern to visibility reduction because they are, or become, efficient light scatterers or absorbers are fine particulates, nitrogen dioxide, and sulfur dioxide. Nitrogen dioxide, 

### as a gas, has the ability to absorb blue light, thus affecting the perceived color of the atmosphere. The light reaching the eye will be defecientin theblue spectrum, thus the atmosphere will appear brown or re.ddisl.1 in the shade and grey in a lighted location. Sulfur dioxide, under condusive conditions, can convert into

### a sulfate aerosol in which microscopic solid or liquid particles are suspended in a gaseous media. Nitrogen dioxide can also form an aerosol. The aerosols which encompass the fine particulates (less thn 2.5 um in diameter) have excellent light scatteringability. Visibility by light scatteringproduces the white or grey haze thatfrequently occurs over the eastern US. during the summer months. In fact, light scattering due to the fine particulate aerosols have been shown tobe the dominant mechanism in the reduction of 

### visibility in remote areas of the Southeastern United States. The principle sources of fine particulates are sulfur and nitrogen gases emanating from power plants, industrial sources and automobile emissions. Organic pollutants are also of interest because they can contribute tothe formation of sulfates, nitrogen oxides, and organic aerosols. Table 

### 1 summarizes the typical size ranges of. a number of common atmospheric aerosols. The term "visual range" is 

### a widely applied measure of visibility. Simply defined; thevisual range is thatdistance beyond which a specified target (usually defined as 

### a large, black object) cannot be 

### distinguished from the background sky. Thus, visual range is a measure of the apparent contrast of an object at some distance from the observer. The concept of visual range has been traditionally used asan indication of visibility. However, there are limitations to the amount of information regarding the visual air quality provided by 

### a reported visual range value. For example, the visual range technique cannot determine whether the reduced visibility 

### at a particular time isdue toprecipitation ordue toair pollution. Thus, the need for more technically competent methods of determining the cause 

### of visibility impairment arenecessary.Table 1 Typical Size Ranges ot a Numberof Aerosols Commonly FoundInthe Atmosphere

.*,*.+,vx <,-flVAcl.T,,L" -..-.: ,.~,./c.<.c.>, >>:y:".:rr.:.rrrr<<<e ::,...l...l.. I':I'.I'.I' :?.:,.< -.-~::::~:~c..:~ .-..;
.... >:.....

~~~~<:<"',"'"'"'"'."'."'.<.:.:~:."'".. ,,,, .....,.

### ..---"'..

..,., .. . A,." . . ...

-.... ., -i::---:>.:..::.i.:

,.. ; .,. . . .. . : 

### ..... .... .. . ..... d-..,i- ,,- ,. mrr:.*~,s"4 ,. "

A,.., w,.,.... ;. .,;:..,*_

......-.-, .. rrri...iiiii..,ii ., :.;...:.:.:.:> .:...:.:....:.:......:.:.:.:.:..~.~:.iiiiii~i~i:ii.iiii.iiiiiiiY~..Y ... ..:......... ; .......:.. ,:. .:.-,>. ,.:.
....... :.. Part~cle Diameter, Microns (Imm)

Technicci Oefinltions

Common Atmospheric

Aersols Clouds 

### -Smog I! 

### / I raln

# - andfoq 

## '1- I

t+ Oil smokes -cl- Fly asn --------c( 

## I 

# I I 

# I -Tobacco jmoke 

# , ~oo~~dus~~,



### - Melallurqical dusts and fumes I I Cement
-. 

## I Beoch , ,dust 

### / sand I Contact , I I -Carbon block -: Pulverized coal*

Other Typica

Aerosols Zinc oxide lnsecf~cide

### 1

__C fume

## I * 

# Its I &Ground talc Colloidal

S~lica
Aitken I 1 

### ---- ___) Milled flour*

nucle~

- A:mcscner~cdust- 

### --

### ----i

### Appendix B 

### Visibility 

## - hleasuring and Monitoring Techniques

Characterization of visibility and its impairment involves the measurement of variables that: I) relate directly to what the observer sees, 2) can be monitored directly, and 3) 

### can be related to 

### the atmospheric constituents controlling visibility. Apparent target contrast is a 

### variable which meetsthe first t w o c r i t e r i a a n d s e r v e s asthe fundamental measure of visibility impairment. Color change also meets the first two criteria. However, current knowledge does not allow for a definition of the hest 

### way to express vista color and color change. ?v,leasurernents of fine particulate concentration and scattering coefficient go 

### a long way toward achieving the second and third criteria and should be considered as an integral part of any visibility monitoring program. Visual range cannot be measured directly by any instrument. When site intercomparisons are required (such as for establishing regional trends) it will be necessary touse visual range as

### a normalizing andhistorical parameter. OpticalInstruments Optical visibility-related instruments are divided into three major classes: contrast, scattering and transmission type measurement. Contrast type instruments measure the amount of radiant energy reaching 

### a detector from selected targets and their surrounding background. These instruments are called telephotometers and directly measure the apparent spectral radiance of the sky, target, or plume and thus allow for a claculation of target or plume contrast and its change. Light scattering instrurnents measure the light scattered from a 

### relatively small volume of air in specified directions from one point in space. Transmission instruments measure the amount of light transmitted from a 

### specified source to

### a receiver. T e l e p h o t o m e t e r s Telephotometers make measurements in 

### a way that is similar toobservations made by the human eye. Properties of the target, air quality (homogeneity and concentration of visibility reducing aerosols), distance to the target, illumination of the sight path, humidity, and observation angle all affect the measurement. A disadvantage of 

### making such measurements with telephotorneters is that it is difficult to separate the -various effects. Separation of effects is important if the goal is to isolate the effect of anthropogenicair pollutants on visibility. HumanEye Observation
Human eye observation is an important contrast type a~proach to measuring visibility. Human eye observations are useful in establishing whether visibility impairment is reasonably attributed to 

### an existing stationary source. Further, these observations presented 

### as visual range, form the largest source of historical visibility data. By knowing distances to spatially distributed vistas or targets, trained observers are able to approximate the

### furthest distance they can see, thus, determining the visual range. However, natural targets or objects available for viewing at 

### different locations are not uniform in directions and distances from the observation sites, making the comparison of sitesdifficult. Scattering Instruments Scattering instruments measure a 

### basic optical property of the air sample, the volume scattering function, which is independent of target properties, natural illumination of the atmosphere, and distance between the observer and the target. Many scattering instruments enclose the air sample allowing continuous day and night operation by eliminating any need to use natural illumination. Enclosed instruments also allow control of arnbient air conditions in order to study the influence of relative humidity, for example. Transmission Instruments.
Transmission instruments allow the direct calculation of the average attenuation coefficient of the air along the instrument path. These instruments are independent of the effects of target properties and the natural illumination of the sight path. Transmission type instruments are not recommended for routine visibility monitoring. Aerosol Measurements There are several instrumental methods that measure size distribution, mass concentration, ornumber concentration of the aerosol that usually dominates the scattering and absorption of light in air. Given the aerosol size distribution, aerosol light scattering can be used to calculate the scattering coefficient and thus allow an approximate determination of contrast reduction, visual range, and color change, Further, aerosol characterization may allow the identification of aerosol sources so that the relative contribution of these sourcestovisibility degradationcan be evaluated and in turn the visibility degradation resulting from anthropogenic activities canbe determined. Generally, the mass distribution of atmospheric aerosol canbe classified 

### as coarse and fine. Thecoarse aerosol is defined ascontaining particles greater in size than 2 micrometers, while s m a l l e r p a r t i c l e s areconsidered toconprise the fineaerosol. Usually, thecoarse particles are mechanically produced and the fine particles are 

### a result of condensation and coagulation processes. Typical particle samplinghas been performed with filters collecting particles over the entire range from 100 to 0.1 micrometers in diame.ter. Ideally, for visibility monitoring, particles should be size segregated into many samples since their efficiency for light scattering is size dependent. However, since airborne particlesbetween 

### 1 and0.1 micrometers in diameter dominate other particles in their ability to 

### scatter light, itispossible to'sample in fewer size ranges. Particles should be collected in two size ranges corresponding t o t h e two aerosol classifications. The size range selected by theEPA for inhalable particulate monitoring canbe used.

### Photography Photographic documentation can be utilized to reasonably attribute visibility impairment to existing stationary sources. It also provides a means of documenting the e f f e c t o f light absorption by NO2 on plume color, i.e., 

### the "brown cloud" effect. Photographic data serves as a supplement to other measurement techniques.

### Appendix C 

### Visibility Monitoring Strategy

Background In July 1980, the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA), in cooperation with the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the National Park Service (NPS) established the Look Rock visibility and air quality monitoring station at the western edge of the Great Smoky Mountains National Park (GSRINP) as a primary visibility monitoring station for theEastern United States. The primary objective of the Look Rock monitoring station is to understand and document the nature and causes of any visibility impairment and to appl

# 1 this information in assessing I) new source impacts on Federal Class I 

### areas andRrend analysis for long term visibility management. The visibility monitoring techniques employed include photography, telephotometry and nephelometry. In order to correlate visibility observation with factors influencing visibility, ambient air quality and meteorological measurements arealso made. The background visibility data obtained from this station during the period of July 1980 through August 1983, has been compiled by TVA and made available to the Tennessee Air Pollution Control Division. The NPS in cooperation with EPA and TVA has been responsible for operating the monitoring station since August, 1983. The data is collected and transmitted to the NPS Office in Denver, Colorado. At this time, no data from the NPS has been made available totheDivision.

Station description
To better understand and document the nature and causes of visibility impairment in the GSMNP, the Look Rock monitoring station was established June 1980. Look Rock, named for its scenic vistas, was selected for this purpose because on clear days, 

### a panoramic view of the GSMNP is possible from the observation tower. The locations of Look Rock and some of theprominent geographic featuresvisible from theLook Rock observation tower areshown in figure 

### I. Look Rock at 35'38' north latitude and 83'57' west longitude, is situated atop Chilhowee Mountain, 

### 792 meters 

### (m)above mean sea level. It is located 

### at the boundry seperating two regions of sharply differing terrain 

## - the Tennessee Valley to the northwest and the Great Smoky Cvlountains to the southeast. Figure 2, 

### a cross-sectional display of the terrain near Look rock, graphically illustrates the contrast. In order to more completely describe the visual air quality, several monitoring techniques areemployed 

### at the Look Rock research station. Slide photographs are used to document the appearance of distance vistas as they would appear to an observer and 

### to give a measure of visibility obscuring phenomena (ie.; fog, rain and clouds, and haze). Telephotometers are used to measure the contrast between distance mountains and the horizon above. Measurements of the ability of the polluted air t o s c a t t e rlight areperformed with a 

### nephelometer.

### In order to correlate visibility observations with factors influencing visibility, ambient airquality measurements arealsoperformed attheLook Rock station. To measure gaseous pollutants, monitors that continuously record concentrations of nitrogen oxides, ozone, and gaseous sulfur are used. TO determine the levels of particulate contaminants, I2 

### hour integrated size fractionated filter samples are collected and analyzed to determine the elemental composition of the ambient aerosol and 

### to give an estimate of fine (particles less than 2 um) and course (particle diameter between 2.5 and 15 um) ambient aerosol mass. The results of these analyses are useful in apportioning the observed air pollution to probable contributing sources. A description of the instruments, measured pollutants and frequency of rneasurements is given in Table 1.


### It is the intention of the Tennessee Air Pollution Control Division, in cooperation with the EPA, NPS and TVA, to incorporate the data obtained from this station in the protection of visibility strategy. The details of how this visibility monitoring data will be incorporated into our protection of existing and prevention of future visibility impairment strategy are not yet confirmed. 

### It is our intention to enter into an agreement with TVA and the 

### NPS to obtain, evaluate and encorporate the data into a visibility protection program. Future details of this program will be made available when the agreement is finalized.
The Tennessee Air Pollution Control Division also intends to use any available visibility data, including the Look Rock visibility data, if applicable, to evaluate visibility impairment in the Joyce Kilmer-Slickrock National Wilderness Area in Tennessee aswell asimpactson surroundingStates' Class

### I areas. HMW/as APC-HOLD 

### 6

## - Table 1 Aerometric MonFtoring Methods

. . 

### Parameter Analytical Methodology/Instrument Frequency

Aerosol mass (Eine/coarse) Fine aerosol composition Sulfate and nitrate

Scattering coefficient

Contrast

Vista appearance

Wind speed and direction Temperature D.P. Solar intensity Gaseous Flame photometric/Monitor Labs, Model 8450 Continuous 

### NO 

## + Oj che~ilunlnescence/ 

### Monitor Labs, 

### Con:inuous tiode1 

### 8440 03 

## + C2H4 chemiluninescence/ Monitor Labs, Continuous

Kodel 8410

Aerosol Dichotomous sample/Sierra Instruments, Inc. 24-hour

Model 244 Proton Induced X-Ray emission/SII Model 244 24-hour

Ion 

### chromatograpny/multi-filter ass~mbly Periodically

Visibility Integrating 

### nephelometer/Meteorology Research, Continuous

Inc.,Model 1950

. 

### 4 vavelength telephotometer/MRI,Model 3030 Continuous Two vistts 35-m 

### slide photographs/Olympus,Model 

### OM-10 Three times daily Two vistts
Meteorological
Vane, anemorneter/mI, Model 1022 Continuous Thernistor/?iRI,Model 892-1 Continuous ~ygrometer/MRI, Model 892-1 Continuous Eppley cell/MRI, Model unknoyn ContinuousASSOCIATED CORRESPONDENCETENNESSEEDEPARTMENTOF HEALi'ii AND ENVIRONMENT Bureau ol Environment T.EF7.R.A. BUILDING 

### Mr. Bob Swiger 150 NINTH AVENUENORTH 

### Fire Staff Officer NASHVILLE. TENNESSEE 37219-5404 

### Forest SupervismsOffice 2300 

### N. OcoeeStreet Box 20lo Cleveland, TN 

### 37311
Dear Mr. Swigec
The Tennessee Air Pollution Control Division is currently in the process of developing a visibility State Implementation Plan (SIP). Part of the federal requirements 

### far the visibility SIP development require the identification oi visibility impairanent in the Federal Class I areas by the State or Federal Land Manager 

### (FLLO- This impairment must be identified 

### at least six months prior to the SIP or SIP rcvision submittal in order toallow the State enough time to develop 

### a plan to remedy the impairment (F.R. 45-233-80086). The State of Tennessee has not identified 

### any visible impairment for Federal Class 

### I areas 

### at this time nor have we received any such notification from the FLIM's. Therefore, 

### I am formally requesting any information concerning visibility impairment that has been identified by 

### the US. Forest S e r v i c e f o rthe Wilderness Areas in Tennessee. Please include 

### a list of any sources which may require a Best Available Retrofit Technology (BART1 assessment. 

### I am also requesting that this information be submitted to 

### this Division within 60 days of receipt of this letter.
Since our projected date for the visibility SIP submittal is Xiay 6, 1985 and no visibility impairment has been identified 

### to date, we are not addressing existing visibility impairment in the SIP draft. Our intention then is to statein our SIP tha? no visible impairment has been identified in Tennessee's Federal Class I areas and

. 

### to address only future visibility impairment that may be certified to the State.

However, if the FLM's certify existing visibility impairment within six months of the submittal 

### of any revisions to the visibility SIP, this assessment will then be addressed in the SIP revision.
It is our intention to cooperate 

### in every way with the 

### US. Forest 'Service to preserve visibility in Tennessee's Federal Class 

### I areas. We look forward to 

### working closebwith you to fulfill this goal.
If you have 

### aqquestions concerning this letter, please feel free to contact me or Heather M. 

### Wow of my staff 

### at(615)741-3931 or(615)741-3651 respectively. Sincerely,

Harold 

### E. Hoges, 

### P.E. Director TennesseeAirPollution Control Division'9:;.

. 

### . .



# . .. 'I
. - 

# -

United States Department of the 

# Interior

. -.

. . NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

. . -.

. . SOUTHEAST REGIONAL OFFICE%'.

# ' -

. 75 Spring Slrccc. S.W. 

# - - Allanla. Georgia 30303 ., . . i.

.. ..-
.

,.

.. t;lfi!?

### 2 6 

### 1985 / '\, '
. Mr. Harold EejHodges, Director ?i'Jision of 4ir pollution control
---- _.- '- - 

## -. - -

. . and -. ., 

## ;. - 

# - .- . .


### .. i.. 7- T.E.R.R 

### ..:I Building

. ,. 

# . q '7, :' 

### -.. ,J-r-'* 

## - - 150 Ninth Avenue, North

. . . . Nashville, Tennessee 37203

.- 2



# _ -. .. 7 .-.. \ Dear -W. Hodges:

. . 

### . .> .; 

### .. This is in response to your request for the identification of any visibility impairment in Great Smoky Mountains National Park which has been documented by the National Park Service (NPS).

. As you may know, the NPS has been monitoring visibility in Great Smoky Mountains National Park at the Uok ~ock Station since 1981.
Our monitoring has documented widespread visibility degradation primarily manifested as a regional haze. Laboratory analyses of air samples collected at our monitoring station indicate that sulfate aerosols resulting from anthrowgenic sulfur emissions are the principal components of this pervasive haze. However, we have not identified specific plume impacts in the park or haze layers reasonably attributable to any specific source(s)

# . At such time that plume or layered-haze impacts are identified
as causing impairment, we will provide appropriate notification to the State.
Thank you for consulting with us as you initiate developnent of visibility protection provisions as part of the State implementation plan. We look forward to working with you in the developnent of this plan av.d future 

# r activities that may have an impact on park unit resources undex- NPS management. Sincerely,



# &y

Actinr Regional Dire= or Southeast Region

cc: Mr. James T. wilburn Chief, Air mnagement ranch EPA Region IV 

## - Atlanta

# -

United States Forest Cherokee P.0. Box Department of 

### Service National 

# ores st Clevelar 

### Aariculture 3771

### 1
Reply 

### To: 2120



### _ Date: February 

### 15,

'.. 

### Mr. Hamld 

### E. Hodges, 

### P.E. Director 

# +&&

Tennessee 

### Air Polution Control Division 

### 150 Ninth Avenue North Nashville, Tn., 

### 37219-5404

Dear 

### Mr. Hodges:

-

### --- ._. 

### _ This letter 

### is to inform you that 

### I am"nnot-.aware of 

### any visibility impairments on Class 1 areas on th< Cherokee National Forest. Sincerely, 

## ./

SWIGER 

### Air Quality Coordinator 4Un~ted States h~est Service 

### Southern ~epartment of 

### Regional 1720 Peachtree Rd., N.W. 

### Room 812 AgflcLIkWe nffirp fi 7 3

ore 

### January 22, 1985

r 

### Ms. Heather tlhi

### tlow Tennessee Deoartment of Hea i 

### ronment I th 

### and 

### Env ~ivision of Air Po1lution Control 150 9th 

### he. No. 

# ,- Nashvil ley Tennessee 37203



### Dear Heather: It was a pleasure talking to you on Friday regarding the vi si bi 1 ity regulatims and State Implementation Plans. Your interest in our Cl

### ass I areas isappreciated. Enclosed 

## far your information and use are two maps. The larger map shows the National Farest Nil dernesses and Primitive Areas. The 1

### ast Congress pased wilderness bills, for which the areas are not shown on the enclosed map. The second 

### mp shows the Class I areas in 

### the Southern Region. In addition to Cohutta md 

### Joyce-Kilmer Mil

### derness Areas, the 100 kilometer area for Linville Gorge Wilderness Area also appears to be in 

### Tennessee. If I 

### can be 

### of further assistance, please call. Sincerelp, n



### Enclosu~s

### - TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OFHEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT Burmu ot Emironmsnt

... 

### ..- .....

### - .. 

# . ,: . T-E-RRA BUILDING

. 

### - ...... 

### -
.. -r.. ....... roi 

### .. 150 NINTH AVENUENORTH ' .
........ . 

### . 

## F<

...... . ..... 

## - .-- __....

. . 

### ... ...... NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE 37'201

..... ..... w. 

## --

...... .... , .. ;

.

### - 

## .- .\

., .



### . JAN 2 3 .%

Mr. Jonn GrLsciano Coordinator, Denver Air Quality Field Unit National Pzk Service 

# - Air P. 0. Box 25287 Denver, 

### CO 80225
Dear 

### Yf. Ckistiano:
.The Tennessee Air Pollution Contral'Division 

### is currently in the process or'

developing 

### a visibility state.implementation plan 

### (SIP)


# . Part of' the federal requiremenzs for the visibility SIP development require the identsication of visibility imuairnenc 

### in the Federal 

### Class I areas by the State or Federal Land bnager (FLY). This buairment mst be identsied at 

### least: 6 months prior to the SIP or 

### SIP revision submittal 

### in order to allow the State enough t~ke to dwelop a plan to remedy the impairment (F.R. 45-233-80086). The State or' Tennessee has not identified any visible impaimenc for Eederal Clzss I areas at this t-me nor have we received any such notification from the ELX. Therefore, 

### I am formally requesting any 

### inforsation concernno, visibility ikpairment &icn has been identified by the National Park Service for zhe Great Smoky Nomtains National Park. Please include 

### a list of any sources wnich may require a Best Available.Retrofit Technology 

### (BART) assessment. I 

### am also requesting that this information be submitted to this Division within 60 days ai receipt of this letter..
Since ourprojected date for the visibility SIP submittal is May 6, 1985 znd no visibi7ity imuairment has been identified to.date., we are not addressing existingvisibility impairment 

### in the SIP draft. Our intention then is to state 

### in aur SIP that no visible inuairnent has been-identified 

### in Temessee's Federal 

### Class I areas and to address ody future visibility impairment that may be c-tif ied to the state. However, Ff the FT,$f certifies exist-bg vrsibility Wairaent within 6 months of the submittal of any revisions to the visibilLT SIP, this assessment will then be addressed in the SIP revision
### It 

### is om intention to cooperate 

### in every way with the National Park Senice to pres-e visibility in Tennessee's Federal Class I areas. We look fornard to working closely with you to fulfill this goal.

### Mr. ChristLano Page 2



### Lf you 'have 

### any questions concerning this 

### lerter, please feel.free KO contact me orHeather 

### H. Whitlow of my 

### staff at 

### 615-741-3931 or 

### 615-741-3651 respectively

... ..*
. ... . :.-

...... . . :
.... .. 

### -

# . -...-:.- ;. 

## - . .

... ... .... 

## -

Harold 

### E. Boages 

### , P .E. Director Divisim of 

### kir 

### Pollution Concirol
shb

cc: 

### Dr. John Peine