alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 110 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 110

 Expressing the sense of Congress that Iraq should vote to approve or 
 disapprove the continued deployment of United States Armed Forces to 
 Iraq and, unless Iraq votes to approve such continued deployment, the 
President of the United States should commence the phased redeployment 
  of United States Armed Forces from Iraq within 60 days of the Iraqi 
                                 vote.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2007

  Mr. Shays submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
 referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the 
Committee on Armed Services, for a period to be subsequently determined 
 by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as 
        fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing the sense of Congress that Iraq should vote to approve or 
 disapprove the continued deployment of United States Armed Forces to 
 Iraq and, unless Iraq votes to approve such continued deployment, the 
President of the United States should commence the phased redeployment 
  of United States Armed Forces from Iraq within 60 days of the Iraqi 
                                 vote.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),  
That it is the sense of Congress that--
            (1) the Government of Iraq should hold a vote in the Iraqi 
        Council of Representatives or among the Iraqi general voting 
        public to approve or disapprove the continued deployment of 
        United States Armed Forces to Iraq; and
            (2) unless 60 percent of the members of the Iraqi Council 
        of Representatives or the Iraqi general voting public vote to 
        approve the continued deployment of United States Armed Forces 
        to Iraq, the President of the United States should commence the 
        phased redeployment of United States Armed Forces from Iraq 
        within 60 days of the Iraqi vote.
                                 <all>
```
TIME 1425 HRS

DATE 2/26/2015

RECORD OF CONVERSATION

NAME(S) OF PERSON(S) CONTACTED OR IN CONFERENCE AND LOCATION

Ray Johnson, FAA Airmen Cert ification Branch, AFS-810

Jason Robinson, Aero-Flite, Lead CL-415 Pilot

SUBJECT

Request for further information, Aero-Flite Pe tition for Exemption, dated 20 February 2015

DIGEST

On 26 February 2015, I contacted Mr. Robinson for the aircraft model and SN so that it can be

included on their r equest for exemption.

On 27 February 2015, Mr. Robinson res ponded with the requested information.

CONCLUSION, ACTION TAKEN, OR REQUIRED

The information provided by Aero-Flite, Inc. will be used by the Federal Aviation

Administration during the consideration of the petition for exemption.

Ray Johnson, AFS-810
110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 316 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That when the House adjourns on the legisla3 tive day of Thursday, March 13, 2008, or Friday, March 

4 14, 2008, on a motion offered pursuant to this concurrent 

5 resolution by its Majority Leader or his designee, it stand 

6 adjourned until 2 p.m. on Monday, March 31, 2008, or 

7 until the time of any reassembly pursuant to 
2 

•HCON 316 EH 

1 section 2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs 

2 first; and that when the Senate recesses or adjourns on 

3 any day from Thursday, March 13, 2008, through Friday, 

4 March 28, 2008, on a motion offered pursuant to this con5 current resolution by its Majority Leader or his designee, 

6 it stand recessed or adjourned until noon on Monday, 

7 March 31, 2008, or such other time on that day as may 

8 be specified in the motion to recess or adjourn, or until 

9 the time of any reassembly pursuant to section 2 of this 

10 concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first. 

11 SEC. 2. The Speaker of the House and the Majority 

12 Leader of the Senate, or their respective designees, acting 

13 jointly after consultation with the Minority Leader of the 

14 House and the Minority Leader of the Senate, shall notify 

15 the Members of the House and the Senate, respectively, 

16 to reassemble at such place and time as they may des17 ignate if, in their opinion, the public interest shall warrant 

18 it. 

Passed the House of Representatives March 12, 

2008. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 316 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Providing for a conditional adjournment of the 

cess or adjournment of the Senate. House of Representatives and a conditional re-
September 29, 1941

No. 46374.

#### Petition 6105-R of Freedman & Slater, Inc.

C. D. 494. Petitioner’s application for rehearing denied.
#### NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. KELLY BROTHERS SHEET METAL, INC., Respondent.

No. 04-16742

Non-Argument Calendar.

Agency Nos. 12-CA-22495, 12-CA-22544.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

Aug. 26, 2005.

Before BIRCH, BARKETT and COX, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The National Labor Relations Board seeks enforcement of its decision and order finding that Kelly Brothers Sheet Metal, Inc. engaged in unfair labor practices in violation of sections 8(a)(1) and 8(a)(3) of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 158(a)(1) and 158(a)(3). We review the Board’s decision to ensure that it is supported by substantial evidence on the *239record as a whole, and we give “special deference to the ALJ’s credibility determinations, which will not be disturbed unless they are inherently unreasonable or self-contradictory.” *NLRB v. McClain of Georgia, Inc.,*138 F.3d 1418, 1422 (11th Cir.1998).

Having considered the briefs, and relevant parts of the record, we find no reason to disturb the ALJ’s credibility determinations. We hold that substantial evidence supports the Board’s decision and order.

The Board’s order is enforced in full.

ORDER ENFORCED.
(Reap. Dec. 8851)

#### Mobo Toys, Inc. *v.*United States

Entry Nos. 2035; 3890.

(Decided June 20, 1957)

*Tompkins <& Tompkins*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Mollison, Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the Plaintiff and the Assistant Attorney General for the United States, Defendant, subject to the approval of the court, that at the time of exportation of the merchandise covered by the above-named reappraisement appeals, there was no “foreign value”, “export value”, nor “United States value” therefor as defined in Section 402, Tariff Act of 1930 as amended, and that the “cost of production” as defined in Section 402 (f) of said Act was as follows, net packed, British shillings:

> Cost of produc-

> Reappraisement appeal No. Invoice identification tion — Each

> 243454-A_ Chair desk_ 19/9d

> 249417-A_ Chair desk_ 19/9d

> Merry-Go-Round_ 43/3d

> That the above named reappraisement appeals are limited to the above specified items on the invoices covered by said appeals, which appeals are submitted for decision upon this stipulation and the entry papers on file with the court.

On the agreed facts I find the cost of production, as that value is defined in section 402 (f) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise listed below, and that such values were as follows:

> Per each English

> Reappraisement No. Invoice identification currency

> 243454-A___ Chair desk...__ 0/19/9

> 249417-A__ Chair desk__ 0/19/9

> Merry-go-round_ 0/43/3

> All net packed.

*701Insofar as the appeals relate to a,11 other merchandise they are hereby dismissed.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
Exhibit
      32.1






Certification






Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


(Subsections
      (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63


of
      Title
      18, United States Code)




Pursuant
      to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.  1350),
      the undersigned officer of SonomaWest Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation
      (the "Company"), does hereby certify that:




The
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 (the
      "Form 10-Q") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section
      13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
      the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.






Dated:
      November 14, 2007





/s/
      Walker R
      Stapleton


Walker
      R.
      Stapleton, President, Chief


Executive
      Officer and Chief Financial Officer






A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      SonomaWest Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by SonomaWest Holdings, Inc.
      and
      furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.
Exhibit 31.1

Certification of Senior Officer in Charge of the Servicing Function

of the Servicer Pursuant to Rule 15d-14(d)

CERTIFICATION

I, Kevin
J. Cullum, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Nissan Auto Receivables 2016-B Owner Trust
(the Exchange Act periodic reports);

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4. I am
responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the
following unaffiliated party: U.S. Bank National Association

Date: June 26, 2018



By:

/s/ Kevin J. CullumKevin J. CullumPresident and Chief Executive Officer ofNissan Motor Acceptance Corporation(senior officer in charge of the servicing function)
# C_2017437EN.01000501.xml

| 18.12.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 437/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.12.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 437/5

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 25 October 2017 — Polyelectrolyte Producers Group GEIE (PPG), SNF SAS v European Chemicals Agency, Kingdom of the Netherlands, European Commission

(Case C-650/15 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (REACH) - Article 57 - Substances of very high concern - Identification - Article 2(8)(b) - Exemption - Article 3(15) - Definition of ‘intermediate’ - Acrylamide))

(2017/C 437/06)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Appellants: Polyelectrolyte Producers Group GEIE (PPG), SNF SAS (represented by E. Mullier and R. Cana, avocats, and by D. Abrahams, Barrister)

Appellants:

Other parties to the proceedings: European Chemicals Agency (represented by M. Heikkilä and W. Broere, acting as Agents, and by J. Stuyck and S. Raes, advocaten), Kingdom of the Netherlands (represented by M. Bulterman and B. Koopman, acting as Agents), European Commission (represented by K. Talabér-Ritz, E. Manhaeve, K. Mifsud-Bonnici and D. Kukovec, acting as Agents)

Other parties to the proceedings:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders Polyelectrolyte Producers Group GEIE (PPG) and SNF SAS to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA); |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Polyelectrolyte Producers Group GEIE (PPG) and SNF SAS to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA);

| 3. | Orders the Kingdom of the Netherlands and the European Commission to bear their own costs |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Kingdom of the Netherlands and the European Commission to bear their own costs

---

(1)  OJ C 48, 8.2.2016.

1

---
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED OC TOBER 17, 2014

NO. 03

- 14

- 00204

- CR

The State of Texas, Appellant

v.

Robert Andrew Johnson, Appellee

APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, PEMBERTON, AND FIELD

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE FIELD

This is an appeal from the order granting a motion to quash signed by the tr i a l court. Having

reviewed the record , the Court holds that The State of Texas has not prosecuted its appeal and

did not comply with a notice from the Clerk of this Court. Therefore, the Court dismisses the

appeal for want of prosecution. The State of Texas shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both

in this Court and the court below.
Case No. 14,651.

#### UNITED STATES v. BROCKETT.

[2 Cranch, C. C. 441.] *1*

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

Nov. Term, 1823.

Si-avehy — Indictment fok Beating Slave.

To cruelly, inhumanly, and maliciously cut,, slash, beat, and ill-tieat one’s own slave, is an indictable offence at common law.

The indictment charged that the defendant [Robert Brockett, Sr.], “in and upon one negro slave, named Nat, the property of him,. *1242tlie said liobert Brockett, Sen., in the peace of God and of the United States, then and there being. did- make an assault, and him, the said negro Nat, did then and there cruelly, inhumanly, and maliciously, cut. slash, beat, and ill-treat, and other wrongs and injuries to the said negro Nat, then and there did, to the great damage of the said negro Nat. and against the peace and government of the United States.”

Mr. Taylor, for defendant,

contended that If the whipping be private, there is no limit, so that it does not extend to voluntary killing or mutilation. But in order to prevent the necessity of the court’s giving any instruction on this point, he admitted that if the jury should be of opinion that the offence justified the language of the indictment, it is an indictable offence.

Mr. Swann, for United States,

cited Res-publica v. Teiseher. 1 Dali. [1 U. S.] 335. .

The jury found the following verdict: “We, of the jury, find the traverser not guilty of the counts as stated in the indictment, but recommend that the court should express their strong disapprobation of similar conduct. C. Griffith, Foreman.”
# C_2018152EN.01002501.xml

| 30.4.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 152/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.4.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 152/25

---

Judgment of the General Court of 15 March 2018 — Poland v Commission

(Case T-507/15) (1)

1

((EAGF - Expenditure excluded from financing - Regulation (EC) No 2200/96, Directive 2002/55/EC, Regulations (EC) No 1432/2003, (EC) No 1433/2003, (EC) No 1290/2005, (EC) No 885/2006, (EC) No 1182/2007, (EC) No 1234/2007, (EC) No 1580/2007 and (EU) No 1306/2013 - Expenditure effected by Poland - Risk to EAGF - On-the-spot checks - Recognition criteria of a producer organisation - Discrepancies between language versions - Financial correction))

(2018/C 152/29)

Language of the case: Polish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Republic of Poland (represented by: B. Majczyna, K. Straś, M. Pawlicka and B. Paziewska, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: D. Triantafyllou and A. Stobiecka Kuik, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application pursuant to Article 263 TFEU seeking the partial annulment of Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/1119 of 22 June 2015 excluding from European Union financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) (OJ 2015 L 182, p. 39).

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the application; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the application;

| 2. | Orders the Republic of Poland to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Republic of Poland to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 354, 26.10.2015.

1

---
No. 44218.

#### Protests 737587-G, etc., of Frank Allaire Co. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Brown, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is bodies, hoods,, forms, or shapes similar to those the subject of *Cohn*v. *United States*(4 Cust. Ct. 166, C. D. 314). The protests were therefore sustained.
# C_2016048EN.01000802.xml

| 8.2.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 48/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.2.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 48/8

---

Action brought on 31 July 2015 — Udo Voigt v President of the European Parliament, European Parliament

(Case C-425/15)

(2016/C 048/13)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Udo Voigt (represented by: P. R. Richter, Rechtsanwalt)

Applicant:

Defendants: President of the European Parliament, European Parliament

Defendants:

By Order of 29 October 2015, the Court of Justice of the European Union (First Chamber) held that it clearly does not have jurisdiction to decide on the action for annulment brought by Mr Udo Voigt on 31 July 2015 and referred the case to the General Court of the European Union. It reserved the decision on costs.

---
ipii_ex470.htm

EXHIBIT 4.70
   
 Extension of Debenture Maturity Date
  
 TO Intellipharmaceutics International Inc. (the "Company")
  
 RE: Debenture dated May 1, 2019, for a face amount of US $1,050,000 issued by the Company to Isa Odidi and Amina Odidi (the "Debenture") and the Maturity Date (as defined in the Debenture and as extended from time to time) of such Debenture
  
 The undersigned hereby agree that the current Maturity Date of the Debenture (currently May 31, 2021) is extended to July 31, 2021. 
  
 DATED as of May 31, 2021.
  
 	/s/ Isa Odidi 	 	 	/s/ Amina Odidi	 
	Isa Odidi  	 	 	Amina Odidi
Dave Heineman 

Governor 

Michael Linder, Director 

Department of Environmental Quality 

1200 N Street, Suite 400 

Lincoln, NE 68509 

March 27, 2012 

STATE OF NEBRASKA 

Governor's Policy Research Office 

Lauren L. Hill, Director 

P.O. Box 94601 • Lincoln, Nebraska 68509-4601 

Phone: (402) 471-2414 • Fax (402) 471-2528 

RECEIVE 

MAR 2 8 2012 

Nebraska Dept of Environmental Quality 

By: DEQ#059 

----

RE: Title 129 NAC 1, 17, 19, 27 - Nebraska Air Quality Regulations 

Dear Mr. Linder: 

On March 27, 2012, the Governor approved the above-referenced regulations. The 

Governor's Policy Research Office filed the regulations with the Secretary of State's Office 

on March 27, 2012. 

cc: Policy Advisor 

GPRO File 

Sincerely, 

l 

Barb Damewood 

Administrative Assistant 

An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer 

Printed with soy ink on recycled paper 

-!!!!!!! 

-
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 172 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 172

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas firefighters work devotedly and selflessly on behalf of the people of 
        the United States, without regard for the peril or danger to themselves;
Whereas firefighters carry out the vital role of protecting and ensuring the 
        safety of the public and their property;
Whereas on June 18, 2007, 9 brave men of the Charleston Fire Department 
        selflessly paid the ultimate sacrifice in service to their community;
Whereas the firemen who perished had over 120 years of combined service in the 
        fire department;
Whereas the events of June 18, 2007, constitute the single worst loss of 
        firefighters since September 11, 2001;
Whereas Captain William ``Billy'' Hutchinson, Captain Mike Benke, Captain Louis 
        Mulkey, Engineer Mark Kelsey, Engineer Bradford ``Brad'' Baity, 
        Assistant Engineer Michael French, Firefighter James ``Earl'' Drayton, 
        Firefighter Brandon Thompson, and Firefighter Melvin Champaign were 
        heroes in the truest sense of the word; and
Whereas Charlestonians, South Carolinians, and Americans will forever be 
        grateful for the service of these firefighters and mourn their loss: 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),  
That Congress honors the lives of the 9 fallen City of Charleston 
firefighters who lost their lives in Charleston, South Carolina, on 
June 18, 2007.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 27, 2007.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
110th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                            H. CON. RES. 172

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

     Honoring the life of each of the 9 fallen City of Charleston 
  firefighters who lost their lives in Charleston, South Carolina, on 
                             June 18, 2007.
```
Case Wo. 14,643.

#### UNITED STATES v. BRICKFORD.

[See Case No. 14,591.]
In The 

Court of Appeals 

Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

________________________

No. 07-15-00411-CR 

________________________

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLANT 

 

V. 

 

JIMMIE MARK WHITE, APPELLEE 

 

 

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2 

Potter County, Texas 

Trial Court No. 140,075-2; Honorable Pamela Cook Sirmon, Presiding 

 

November 17, 2015 

 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

 

Before QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ. 

Pending before this court is a Motion to Dismiss filed by Appellant, the State of 

Texas, in which the State requests dismissal of its appeal.1 No decision of this court 

having been delivered, the motion is granted and the appeal is dismissed. TEX. R. APP.

 

1

The State filed a document indicating its intent to appeal a Judgment of Deferred Disposition 

“or in the alternative to seek a writ of mandamus concerning the same.” This court has construed the 

State’s filing as a notice of appeal. If the State wishes to seek a writ of mandamus, it must file an original 

proceeding in accordance with Rule 52 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure.
2

P. 42.2(a). No motion for rehearing will be entertained and our mandate will issue 

forthwith.

Patrick A. Pirtle

 Justice

Do not publish.