alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In re: Jerry L. HARRELSON, Debtor, Lorraine H. Harrelson, Joint Debtor. Gordon Jones, Trustee, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jerry L. Harrelson, Lorraine H. Harrelson, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 05-11707

Non-Argument Calendar.

D.C. Docket No. 04-00520-CV-J-32, BKCY No. 03-09605-3F7.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

Aug. 26, 2005.

Before BIRCH, BARKETT and COX, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Gordon P. Jones, trustee of the bankruptcy estates of Jerry L. Harrelson and Lorraine H. Harrelson (“Trustee”), appeals the judgment of the district court affirming the decision of the bankruptcy court. The Trustee argues that a brokerage account purchased with workers compensation benefits no longer retains its character as workers’ compensation benefits exempt from creditors under Florida Statutes § 440.22. However, we agree with the district court that proceeds of a workers’ compensation lump sum settlement retain their character as “workers’ compensation benefits in the hands of the beneficiary” when those proceeds are deposited in a brokerage house deposit account and used to purchase securities. *See Broward v. Jacksonville Med. Ctr.,*690 So.2d 589, 591 (Fla.1997). The judgment of the district court is, therefore,

AFFIRMED.
III 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 502 

Congratulating all of the contestants of the 2006 Scripps National Spelling 

Bee. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 6, 2006 

Mr. LAUTENBERG (for himself and Mr. MENENDEZ) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Congratulating all of the contestants of the 2006 Scripps 

National Spelling Bee. 

Whereas the Scripps National Spelling Bee is the largest and 

longest-running educational promotion in the United 

States, and is administered by the E.W. Scripps Company and 268 local sponsors, most of whom publish daily 

and weekly newspapers; 

Whereas the 2006 Scripps National Spelling Bee began with 

275 competitors from across the United States, American 

Samoa, the Bahamas, Canada, Europe, Guam, Jamaica, 

New Zealand, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands, each 

of whom had qualified for the contest by winning locallysponsored spelling bees; 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 502 ATS

Whereas Miss Katharine ‘‘Kerry’’ Close is an 8th-grade student at the H.W. Mountz School in Spring Lake, New 

Jersey; 

Whereas the 13-year-old Miss Close first competed in the 

Scripps National Spelling Bee as a 9-year-old, tied for 

7th place in 2005, and competed for the 5th time this 

year, sponsored by the Asbury Park Press and the Home 

News Tribune; 

Whereas Miss Close has spent between 1 hour and 2 hours 

a day looking up words and their origins during the previous 5 years, yet has still found time for sailing, playing 

soccer, and going to the mall and the movies with her 

friends; 

Whereas Miss Close survived 19 rounds of fierce competition 

this year and won the 2006 Scripps National Spelling 

Bee in the 20th round by correctly spelling ‘‘ursprache’’, 

which is defined as ‘‘a parent language, especially one reconstructed from the evidence of later languages’’; and 

Whereas the achievement of Miss Close brings an immense 

sense of pride to H.W. Mountz School, her hometown of 

Spring Lake, and the entire State of New Jersey: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) congratulates all of the contestants of the 

3 2006 Scripps National Spelling Bee; and 

4 (2) respectfully requests the Secretary of the 

5 Senate to transmit an enrolled copy of this resoluVerDate Aug 31 2005 03:02 Jun 07, 2006 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\SR502.ATS SR502

jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
3 

•SRES 502 ATS

1 tion to the H.W. Mountz School, located in Spring 

2 Lake, New Jersey. 

Æ 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In  connection  with the  Annual  Report of BYLOG GROUP CORP.(the "Company")  on Form 10-K/A for the period  ended  March 31, 2017 as filed with the Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "Report"),  the undersigned,  in the  capacities  and  on  the  dates  indicated  below,  hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all material respects,  the financial  condition and   results of operations  of the Company.



Date: January 8, 2018







/s/ Dmitrii Iaroshenko

Dmitrii IaroshenkoPresident,

Chief Executive Officer and

Chief Financial Officer
# C_2017374EN.01002802.xml

| 6.11.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 374/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.11.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 374/28

---

Judgment of the General Court of 22 September 2017 — Nara Tekstil Sanayi Ve Ticaret v EUIPO — NBC Fourth Realty Corp (NaraMaxx)

(Case T-586/15) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU figurative mark NaraMaxx - Earlier national word mark MAXX - Relative ground for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - No similarity between the signs - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2017/C 374/42)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Nara Tekstil Sanayi Ve Ticaret Anonim Sirketi (Osmangazi-Bursa, Turkey) (represented by: M. López Camba and L. Monzón de la Flor, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: S. Bonne, Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: NBC Fourth Realty Corp. (North Las Vegas, Nevada, United States) (represented: initially by D. Stone and A. Dykes, and subsequently by A. Smith, Solicitors, and S. Malynicz QC)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 27 July 2015 (Case R 1073/2014-4), relating to opposition proceedings between NBC Fourth Realty and Nara Tekstil Sanayi Ve Ticaret

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Nara Tekstil Sanayi Ve Ticaret Anonim Sirketi to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Nara Tekstil Sanayi Ve Ticaret Anonim Sirketi to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 406, 7.12.2015.

1

---
No. 56151.

protest 166090-K (Baltimore).

#### James White Rawles *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

An examination of the record failing to disclose evidence sufficient to overcome the presumption of correctness attaching to the collector’s classification, the protest was overruled.
#### Gondrand Transport Corp. *v.*United States

No. 7453.

Invoice dated Shipley Yerkes, England, August 1945.

Certified August 1945.

Entered at New York, N. Y., September 19, 1945.

Entry No. 711569.

(Decided November 24, 1947)

*Brooks & Brooks*for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the.defendant.

Cole, Judge

(Abstract): This appeal for reappraisement of various items of merchandise concerns the so-called British purchase tax, described in the law of the United Kingdom entitled, “Finance (No. 2) Act 1940 3 & 4 Geo. 6 Ch. 48.” The said tax was held not to be an item to be included in foreign value as defined *329in section 402 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended by the Customs Administrative Act of 1938 (19 U. S. C. § 1402 (c)). *United States*v. *Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp.,*33 C. C. P. A. 183, C. A. D. 334.

The agreed set of facts embodied in the stipulation of submission, establish that export value, section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. § 1402 (d)) is the proper basis for appraisement of the instant merchandise, and that such statutory value for the commodity in question is the appraised value, less additions made by the importer on entry because of advances in similar cases.
# C_2016200EN.01002501.xml

| 6.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 200/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 200/25

---

Order of the General Court of 18 March 2016 — Novartis v OHIM — SK Chemicals (Representation of a patch)

(Case T-592/15) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Cancellation proceedings - Revocation of the contested decision - No need to adjudicate))

(2016/C 200/36)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Novartis AG (Basel, Switzerland) (represented by: M. Douglas, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: H. Kunz, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court: SK Chemicals GmbH (Eschborn, Germany)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 7 August 2015 (Case R 2342/2014-5), concerning cancellation proceedings between SK Chemicals GmbH and Novartis AG.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that there is no need to adjudicate on the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that there is no need to adjudicate on the action;

| 2. | Orders the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by Novartis AG and SK Chemicals GmbH. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by Novartis AG and SK Chemicals GmbH.

---

(1)  OJ C 414, 14.12.2015.

1

---
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Timber products output andtimber harvests in Alaska : projections for 1989-2010**
 
Part A | PartB
 
SuDoc:A 13.88:PNW-GTR-261
Item Number:0083-B-06 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000922346
 
November 29, 2017
# C_2016016EN.01001901.xml

| 18.1.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 16/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.1.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 16/19

---

Action brought on 16 October 2015 — European Commission v Republic of Poland

(Case C-545/15)

(2016/C 016/24)

Language of the case: Polish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: M. Heller, K. Herrmann and E. Sanfrutos Cano, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Republic of Poland

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | declare that, by not adopting and bringing into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to ensure compliance with Directive 2012/19/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 July 2012 on waste electrical and electronic equipment, (1) or in any event by not informing the Commission of those provisions, the Republic of Poland has failed to meet its obligations under Article 24(1) of that directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by not adopting and bringing into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to ensure compliance with Directive 2012/19/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 July 2012 on waste electrical and electronic equipment, (1) or in any event by not informing the Commission of those provisions, the Republic of Poland has failed to meet its obligations under Article 24(1) of that directive;

1

| — | impose on the Republic of Poland, pursuant to Article 260(3) TFEU, for its failure to meet its obligation to notify the measures implementing Directive 2012/19/EU a penalty payment at a daily rate of EUR 71 610 from the day on which judgment is delivered in this case; |
| --- | --- |

—

impose on the Republic of Poland, pursuant to Article 260(3) TFEU, for its failure to meet its obligation to notify the measures implementing Directive 2012/19/EU a penalty payment at a daily rate of EUR 71 610 from the day on which judgment is delivered in this case;

| — | order the Republic of Poland to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Republic of Poland to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period for transposing Directive 2012/19/EU expired on 14 February 2014.

---

(1)  OJ 2012 L 197, p. 38.

1

---
#### Associated Merchandising Corp. et al. *v.*United States

No. 6427.

Entry No. 712078, etc.

Invoices dated London, England, September 1943, etc.

Certified September 1943, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., October 21, 1943, etc.

(Decided October 7, 1946)

*Barnes, Richardson & Colburn (Hadley S. King*of counsel) for the plaintiffs.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Mollison, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of'the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importers on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
No. 53781.

protests 140806-K/12991 and 140807-K/12990 (New Orleans).

#### Colonial Sugars Company *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Cole, J.

When the protests were called for hearing they were submitted without the introduction of any evidence to support plaintiff’s contention. An examination of the official papers disclosing nothing to disturb the action of the collector, which was presumptively correct, the protests were overruled.
#### Fischer & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States

No. 6766.

Entry No. 717562, etc.

Invoices dated Nottingham, England, November 1943, etc.

Certified November 1943, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., December 13, 1943, etc.

(Decided January 15, 1947)

*Fred Bennett*for the plaintiffs.

*Paul P. Bao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Tilson, Judge:

The appeals listed in schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, involve the question of whether or not a so-called British purchase tax should be included as a part of the dutiable values of the merchandise.

It has been agreed by counsel for the respective parties that the issues involved in this case are similar in all material respects to the issues involved in *United States*v. *Pitcairn,*C. A. D. 334, and the record in that case has been admitted in evidence in this case.

Upon the agreed facts and the applicable law, I find and hold the proper dutiable export values of the merchandise covered by these appeals to be the values found by the appraiser, less any amounts added by the importers on entry to meet advances made by the appraiser in similar cases then pending on appeal. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
No. 59176.

protest 242938-K (New York).

#### Tice & Lynch, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

An examination of the papers in this case disclosing nothing that would tend in any way to overcome the presumption of correctness attaching to the decision of the collector, the protest was overruled.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 23
- 0604 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, vs. BOBBY FRANCIS LOWRY,

Defendant and Appellant
.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including September 3 , 202 4, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 29 2024

07/29/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0604
Exhibit 32

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Chiquita Brands International, Inc. (the company), does hereby certify,
to such officers knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 of the company fully complies with
the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the company.

Dated: November 9, 2007



|                        |  |  |  |        |  |                        
|----------------------- |  |  |  | ------ |  | -----------------------
|                        |  |  |  |        |  | /s/ Fernando Aguirre   
|                        |  |  |  | Name:  |  | Fernando Aguirre       
|                        |  |  |  | Title: |  | Chief Executive Officer
|                        |  |  | 
|Dated: November 9, 2007 |  |  |  |        |  |                        
|                        |  |  |  |        |  | /s/ Jeffrey M. Zalla   
|                        |  |  |  | Name:  |  | Jeffrey M. Zalla       
|                        |  |  |  | Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer
1 

### Kelly, Shaheerah

From: Kelly, Shaheerah

Sent: Friday, August 07, 2015 8:53 AM

To: tbillie@navajo-nsn.gov

Cc: Kelly, Shaheerah

Subject: NHPA Consultation for McElmo Creek Unit Flare

Hi Tamara,

EPA is processing a federal air permit for the McElmo Creek Unit (MCU) Flare. The applicant has a consultant working on

an assessment of historic properties in the area of potential effects for this project. We spoke few weeks ago and you

mentioned that you would be covering the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) consultation for this project. I

would appreciate it if we could talk about what information EPA will need to send to the Navajo Nation Historic

Preservation Department as part of the NHPA consultation. I plan to follow

‐ up with you by phone during the week of

August 10.

Thanks.

************************************

Shaheerah Kelly

Permits Office, Air Division (AIR-3)

U.S. Environmental Protec tion Agency, Region 9

San Francisco, CA 94105

Phone: 415-947-4156

Fax: 415-947-3579

Email: kelly.shaheerah@epa.gov
# C_2017022EN.01002601.xml

| 23.1.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 22/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.1.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 22/26

---

Judgment of the General Court of 1 December 2016 — Z v Court of Justice of the European Union

Z

Court of Justice of the European Union

(Case T-532/15 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - Civil service - Officials - Staff report - Impartiality of the Civil Service Tribunal - Application for recusal of the members of the formation of the Tribunal which delivered judgment - Rights of defence - Right to effective judicial protection))

(2017/C 022/33)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Z (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: F. Rollinger, lawyer)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: Court of Justice of the European Union (represented initially by A. Placco, and subsequently by J. Inghelram and Á. Almendros Manzano, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union (Second Chamber) of 30 June 2015, Z v Court of Justice (F-64/13, EU:F:2015:72), seeking to have that judgment set aside.

Z

Court of Justice

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders Ms Z to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Ms Z to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 16, 18.1.2016.

1

---
# C_2018032EN.01002101.xml

| 29.1.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 32/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.1.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 32/21

---

Judgment of the General Court of 12 December 2017 — Hochmann Marketing v EUIPO — BitTorrent (bittorrent)

(Case T-771/15) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Revocation proceedings - EU word mark bittorrent - Article 76(1) and (2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 95(1) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - No account taken of evidence submitted before the Cancellation Division - Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation 2017/1001)))

(2018/C 032/27)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Hochmann Marketing GmbH, formerly Bittorrent Marketing GmbH (Neu-Isenburg, Germany), (represented by: C. Hoppe, M. Terhaag and C. Schwarz, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral and M. Capostagno, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: BitTorrent, Inc. (San Francisco, California, United States) (represented by: M. Kinkeldey, S. Clotten, S. Brandstätter and C. Schmitt, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 31 August 2015 (Case R 2275/2013-5) concerning revocation proceedings between BitTorrent and Bittorrent Marketing.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Hochmann Marketing GmbH, formerly Bittorrent Marketing GmbH, to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Hochmann Marketing GmbH, formerly Bittorrent Marketing GmbH, to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 191, 30.5.2016.

1

---