##### Table of Contents

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549  FORM 10-K/A (Amendment No. 1)  ☒
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018 OR  ☐
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period
from                to Commission file number 1-37729  LSC
Communications, Inc. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)   Delaware

36-4829580(State or other jurisdiction ofincorporation or organization)

(I.R.S. EmployerIdentification No.)191 N. Wacker Drive, Suite 1400, Chicago, IL

60606(Address of principal executive offices)

(ZIP Code) Registrants telephone number, including area code  (773)
272-9200 Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:  Title of each Class



Name of each exchange on which registeredCommon Stock (Par Value $0.01)



NYSE   Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes  ☑    No  ☐ Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes  ☐    No ☑ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90
days.    Yes  ☑    No  ☐ Indicate by check mark whether the
registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§229.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such
shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files).    Yes  ☑    No  ☐ Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is
not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any
amendment to this Form 10-K.    ☑ Indicate by check mark whether the
registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of large accelerated filer,
accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, and emerging growth company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.  Large accelerated filer

☑

Accelerated filer  ☐Non-accelerated filer

☐

Smaller reporting company  ☐Emerging growth company

☐ If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended
transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.    ☐ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Act).    Yes  ☐    No  ☑ The aggregate market value of the shares
of common stock (based on the closing price of these shares on the New York Stock ExchangeComposite Transactions) on June 30, 2018, the last business day of the registrants most recently completed second fiscal quarter, held by
nonaffiliates was $512,138,094. As of April 5, 2019, 33,510,017 shares of common stock were outstanding.




---

##### Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS  Form 10-KItem No.


Name of Item

PageExplanatory Notes


3Part IIIItem 10.


Directors and Executive Officers of LSC Communications and Corporate Governance


3Item 11.


Executive Compensation


9Item 12.


Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters


35Item 13.


Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence


37Item 14.


Principal Accounting Fees and Services


38Part IVItem 15.


Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules


38Signatures


39  2




---

##### Table of Contents

EXPLANATORY NOTES This Amendment No. I to Form 10-K (this Amendment) amends the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018 of LSC Communications, Inc. (LSC, LSC Communications, we, our, us and the Company), as
originally filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) on February 19, 2019 (the Original Form 10-K). We are filing this Amendment to present the information
required by Part III of Form 10-K that was previously omitted from the Original Form 10-K in reliance on General instruction G(3) to Form
10-K because a definitive proxy statement containing such information will not be filed within 120 days after the end of the Companys fiscal year ended December 31, 2018. In addition, Item 15 of Part IV has been amended solely to include the currently dated certification of our principal executive officer and principal financial
officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. The certifications of our principal executive officer and principal financial officer are filed with this Amendment as Exhibits 31.3 and 31.4 hereto. Because financial
statements have not been included in this Amendment and this Amendment does not contain or amend any disclosure with respect to Items 307 and 308 of Regulation S-K, paragraphs 3, 4 and 5 of the certifications
have been omitted. We are not including the certifications under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 as no financial statements are being filed with this Amendment. Except as expressly set forth herein, this Amendment does not otherwise update information in the Original Form 10-K to
reflect facts or events occurring subsequent to the file date of the Original Form 10-K. This Amendment should be read in conjunction with the Original Form 10-K. On October 1, 2016, R. R. Donnelley & Sons Company (RR Donnelley or RRD) effected its previously-announced intention to
separate into three independent public companies: Donnelley Financial Solutions, Inc., LSC Communications and RR Donnelley. The separation (the Separation) was effected when RRD distributed on a pro rata basis to holders of its common
stock at least 80% of the outstanding shares of LSC common stock. PART III ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF LSC COMMUNICATIONS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE DIRECTORS The names of the Companys
directors, along with their present positions, their career highlights, current directorships held with other public companies, as well as public directorships during the past five years, other affiliations, their ages and the year first elected as
a director, are set forth below. Certain individual qualifications, experiences and skills of our directors that contribute to the effectiveness of the Companys Board of Directors (the Board) as a whole are also described below.  Thomas J. Quinlan III, 56
 Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President
 Director since:2016
 Current Public Directorships:None

Key Experience and QualificationsMr. Quinlans extensive experience at RR
Donnelley and now LSC provides the Board with expertise in the printing and office products industries, especially with respect to business integration strategies needed to achieve our Companys business plan. He also brings to the Board his
familiarity with a broad range of operational issues, including sales, manufacturing and corporate staff functions, as a result of his many experiences in management roles across several industries.Former Public
Directorships: RR Donnelley

Career Highlights
+  Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company since October 2016
+  Chief Executive Officer and President of RR Donnelley from April 2007 to October 2016
+  Other positions at RR Donnelley from 2004 to April 2007 including Group President, Global Services,
Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President, Operations  3




---

##### Table of Contents

M. Shân Atkins, 62

Key Experience and QualificationsDirector since:2016
 Current Public Directorships:
Darden Restaurants, Inc.

Ms. Atkins has extensive experience in
finance and accounting and in developing and executing strategic and operating plans for major consumer and retail organizations. She also has considerable corporate governance experience through years of service on the boards of other
companies.SpartanNash
Company SunOpta Inc.
Aurora Cannabis Inc. 
Former Public Directorships: Chapters, Inc.
The Pep BoysManny, Moe & Jack Tim Hortons Inc.
Shoppers DrugMart Corporation 
Other Affiliations: True Value Company

Career Highlights
+  Full time independent director
+  Co-founder and Managing Director of Chetrum Capital LLC, a
private investment firm from 2001 to 2017 +  Various executive positions with Sears, Roebuck &
Company, a North American retailer, from 1996 to 2001 +  A leader in the consumer and retail practice
at Bain & Company, an international management consultancy, from 1982 to 1996 +  Began career
as a public accountant at what is now PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an accounting firm  Margaret A. Breya, 57
 Director since:2016
 Current Public Directorships:None
 Former Public Directorships:
Jive Software, Inc. MicroStrategy Incorporated
 Other Affiliations:
InCorta, Inc. NSONE, Inc.

Key Experience and QualificationsMs. Breyas extensive experience brings
marketing, operations and enterprise software expertise to the Board.Career Highlights
+  Chief Marketing Officer of MicroStrategy Incorporated since July 2018
+  Chief Operating Officer of Ionic Security Inc. from January 2016 to June 2018
+  Chief Marketing Officer and Executive Vice President of Market Development at Informatica Corporation, a
leading independent provider of enterprise data integration and data quality software and services, from December 2012 to August 2015
+  Various positions of increasing responsibility in operations and marketing at Hewlett-Packard Company, a
global provider of products, technologies, software, solutions and services, from 2010 to 2012
+  Various positions of increasing responsibility at SAP AG, an enterprise software company, from 2006 to
2010  Judith H. Hamilton, 74
 Director since:2016
 Current Public Directorships:
None 
Former Public Directorships: RR Donnelley
 Other Affiliations:
Novell, Inc. Software.com
Lante Corporation Giga Information Group, Inc.

Key Experience and QualificationsMs. Hamiltons experience as a chief
executive officer of various software and technology companies helps the Board address the challenges faced due to rapid changes in communications strategies. Her involvement in early stage companies also brings to the Board entrepreneurial
experience. She also has considerable corporate governance experience through years of service on the boards of other companies.Career Highlights
+  Lead Director of the Companys Board since October 2016
+  Former President and Chief Executive Officer of Classroom Connect Inc., a provider of materials
integrating the Internet into the education process +  Former President and Chief Executive Officer of
FirstFloor Software, an Internet software publisher +  Former Chief Executive Officer of Dataquest, a
market research firm for technology  Francis J. Jules, 62
 Director since:2016
 Current Public Directorships:None
 Former Public Directorships:
ModusLink Global Solutions, Inc.

Key Experience and QualificationsMr. Jules has a proven track record in
leading large, complex teams around the globe in sales, marketing, product and technical solutions to serve enterprise, medium, and small customers around the world. He has both operational and strategic leadership skills.Career Highlights
+  President of Global Business for AT&T Corporation since 2012
+  AT&T Corporations Executive Vice President, Global Enterprise Solutions sales team from 2010
to 2012, President and Chief Executive Officer, Advertising Solutions from 2007 to 2010 and Senior Vice President, Network Integration from 2005 to 2007
+  President, Global Markets (East) for SBC Communications from 2003 to 2005  4




---

##### Table of Contents

Thomas F. OToole, 61
 Director since:2016
 Current Pubic Directorships:
Alliant Energy Corporation (and its wholly owned subsidiaries Wisconsin Power and Light Company and Interstate Power and Light Company)
Extended Stay America, Inc. 
Former Public Directorships: Pegasus Solutions, Inc.
 Other Affiliations:
Corporation for Travel Promotion

Key Experience and QualificationsMr. OToole has extensive experience in
leadership, customer perspectives and information systems, and provides the Board with a combination of abilities and unique insights into its strategy and operations.Career Highlights
+  Executive Director, Program for Data Analytics and Clinical Professor of Marketing at the Kellogg School
of Management at Northwestern University since September 2018; Senior Fellow and Clinical Professor of Marketing at Kellogg from September 2016 to September 2018
+  Senior Advisor at McKinsey and Company since January 2017
+  Senior Vice President, Chief Marketing Officer of United Airlines and President of MileagePlus for
United Continental Holdings, Inc., a global air carrier, from 2015 to December 2016; Senior Vice President, Marketing and Loyalty and President, MileagePlus from 2012 to 2015; Chief Operating Officer, Mileage Plus Holdings, LLC from 2010 to 2012;
and Senior Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer in 2010 +  Advisor with Diamond
Management & Technology Consultants, a management and technology consulting firm, from 2009 to 2010
+  Various positions of increasing responsibility at Hyatt Hotels Corporation from 1995 to 2008, including
Chief Marketing Officer and Chief Information Officer  Richard K. Palmer, 52
 Director since:2016
 Current Public Directorships:
None 
Former Public Directorships: RR Donnelley
 Other Affiliations:
FCA US LLC

Key Experience and QualificationsMr. Palmers experience as chief
financial officer of both public and global companies, as well as his position as a member of the highest executive decision-making body of a large multinational company, brings financial, international and operational expertise. He is an audit
committee financial expert based on his experience as chief financial officer of a public company as well as his experience as an auditor with a public accounting firm.Career Highlights
+  Chief Financial Officer, Senior Vice President and member of Group Executive Council of Fiat Chrysler
Automobiles N.V. (FCA), an international group that designs, produces and sells passenger cars and commercial vehicles, since 2011
+  Chief Financial Officer of FCA US LLC, a vehicle manufacturer that is part of a global alliance with
FCA, since 2009 +  Chief Financial Officer of Fiat Group Automobiles S.p.A., industrial vehicle and bus
manufacturing company owned by Fiat, from 2006 to 2009 +  Chief Financial Officer of Iveco S.p.A and
Chief Financial Officer, Comau S.p.A., a developer of automation systems and other robotic devices owned by Fiat, 2003 to 2005
+  Prior thereto, various positions at
-   General Electric Company
-   United Technologies Corporation
-   Price Waterhouse (now PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP)  Douglas W. Stotlar, 58
 Director since:2016
 Current Public Directorships:
AECOM Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co.
 Former Public Directorships:
URS Corporation Con-way
Inc.  Other Affiliations:
Stone Canyon Packaging, LLC

Key Experience and QualificationsMr. Stotlar has substantial knowledge of the
transportation and logistics sector, which is relevant to our business activities. In addition, due to his prior experience as the former chief executive officer and as a director of a public company, he contributes valuable leadership experience as
well as knowledge of legal and regulatory requirements and trends.Career Highlights
+  Former President and Chief Executive Officer of Con-way, Inc., a
transportation and logistics company, from April 2005 to October 2015 +  Various positions of
increasing responsibility at Con-way, Inc. from 1985 to 2005  5




---

##### Table of Contents

Shivan S. Subramaniam, 70

Key Experience and QualificationsDirector
since:2016  Current Pubic Directorships:
Citizens Financial Group, Inc. 
Former Public Directorships: None
 Other Affiliations:
FM Global Inc. Lifespan Corporation

Mr. Subramaniam has significant experience as a
chairman and chief executive officer and provides the Board with financial, strategic and operational leadership. He also has considerable corporate governance experience as the chair of a governance committee.Career Highlights
+  Former Chairman of FM Global Inc., a property and casualty insurance company from 2002 to 2017
+  Chief Executive Officer of FM Global Inc. from 1999 to 2014 and President and Chief Executive Officer
from 1999 to 2002 +  Various finance positions of increasing responsibility at Allendale Insurance
Company from 1974 to 1999, including as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer from 1992 to 1999 EXECUTIVE OFFICERS Certain information regarding our executive officers other than Mr. Quinlan is set forth below. Biographical information for Mr. Quinlan, who serves
as the Chairman of the Board of Directors, may be found in Directors above.  Name, Age and Position

Business ExperienceSuzanne S. Bettman, 54
Chief Administrative Officer and General Counsel

Served as Chief Administrative Officer and General Counsel since October 2016. Prior to this, served
as RRDs Executive Vice President, General Counsel, Corporate Secretary and Chief Compliance Officer from January 2007 to September 2016 and as its Senior Vice President, General Counsel from March 2004 to January 2007.Andrew B. Coxhead, 50
Chief Financial Officer

Served as Chief Financial Officer since October 2016. Prior to this, served as RRDs Senior Vice
President and Chief Accounting Officer from October 2007 to September 2016, and Corporate Controller from October 2007 to January 2013 and from 1995 in various other positions including in financial planning, accounting, manufacturing management,
operational finance and mergers and acquisitions, including as Vice President, Assistant Controller.Kent A. Hansen, 48
Chief Accounting Officer and Controller

Served as Chief Accounting Officer and Controller since October 2016. Prior to this, served as Vice
President, Assistant Controller, of Baxalta, Incorporated, a biopharmaceutical company from 2015 to 2016. Prior to this, served in various finance and accounting roles from 2006 to 2015 with Scientific Games Corporation (formerly WMS Industries,
Inc.), including Director of Accounting and SEC Reporting, Assistant Controller, and Group Chief Financial Officer. Prior to this, previous experience included roles in accounting and financial reporting at Accenture and as an auditor at Ernst and
Young LLP.Richard T. Lane, 62
Chief Strategy and Supply Chain Officer

Served as Chief Strategy and Supply Chain Officer since October 2016 and, since 2018, has operational
responsibility for the Companys book segment. Prior to this, served as RRDs Executive Vice President of Global Business Solutions and was responsible for product and materials sourcing, Customer Service and Global Print Management Sales
and Operations and from 1989 to 1997 and since 2005 in various capacities within RRD in sales, strategy and operations, and from 1997 to 2005, with other companies in strategic sales and operations roles. THE BOARDS COMMITTEES AND THEIR FUNCTIONS The Board has three standing committees. The members of those committees and the committees responsibilities are described below. Each committee operates
under a written charter that is reviewed annually and is posted on the Investors section of the Companys website at the following address: www.lsccom.com.  6




---

##### Table of Contents

Audit CommitteeRichard K. Palmer (Chair)
Margaret A. Breya Douglas W. Stotlar
Shivan S. Subramaniam

Responsibilities
 Assists the Board in its oversight of:
 +  The integrity of the Companys
financial statements and the Companys accounting and financial reporting processes and financial statement audits 
+  The qualifications and independence of the Companys independent registered public accounting
firm  +  The performance of the
Companys internal auditing department and its independent registered public accounting firm

The Companys Audit
Committee selects, sets compensation, evaluates and, when appropriate, replaces the Companys independent registered public accounting firm. 
Pursuant to its charter, the Audit Committee is authorized to obtain advice and assistance from internal or external legal, accounting or other advisors and to
retain third-party consultants, and has the authority to engage independent auditors for special audits, reviews and other procedures. 
As required by its charter, each member of the Audit Committee is independent and financially literate, as such terms are defined for purposes of the NYSE
listing rules and the federal securities laws. The Board has determined that each of Richard K. Palmer, Douglas W. Stotlar and Shivan S. Subramaniam is an audit committee financial expert as such term is defined under the federal
securities laws.  Corporate Responsibility & Governance
CommitteeJudith H. Hamilton (Chair)
M. Shân Atkins Margaret A. Breya
Thomas F. OToole Shivan S. Subramaniam

Responsibilities
 +  Makes recommendations to the Board
regarding nominees for election to the Board and recommends policies governing matters affecting the Board 
+  Develops and implements governance principles for the Company and the Board
 +  Conducts the regular review of the
performance of the Board, its committees and its members 
+  Oversees the Companys responsibilities to its employees and to the environment
 +  Recommends director compensation to
the Board

As required by its charter, each
member of the Companys Corporate Responsibility & Governance Committee is independent as such term is defined for purposes of the NYSE listing rules and the federal securities laws.
 Pursuant to its charter, the Corporate Responsibility & Governance Committee is
authorized to obtain advice and assistance from outside advisors and to retain third-party consultants, and has the sole authority to approve the terms and conditions under which it engages director search firms.  7




---

##### Table of Contents

Human Resources CommitteeFrancis J. Jules (Chair) M. Shân Atkins
Thomas F. OToole Douglas W. Stotlar

Responsibilities 
+  Establishes the Companys overall compensation strategy
 +  Establishes the compensation of the
Companys Chief Executive Officer, other senior officers and key management employees 
+  Adopts amendments to, and approves terminations of, the Companys employee benefit plans

As required by its charter, each
member of the Companys Human Resources Committee (the HR Committee) is independent, as such term is defined for purposes of the NYSE listing rules and the federal securities laws. In addition, in accordance with the NYSE listing
rules requiring the Board to affirmatively determine that each member of the HR Committee is independent, the Board considered all factors specifically relevant to determining whether a director has a relationship to the Company which is material to
that directors ability to be independent and affirmatively determined that each member of the HR Committee is independent. 
Pursuant to its charter, the HR Committee is authorized to obtain advice and assistance from internal or external legal or other advisors and has the sole
authority to engage counsel, experts or consultants in matters related to the compensation of the Chief Executive Officer and other executive officers of the Company (with sole authority to approve any related fees and other retention terms).
 Pursuant to its charter, prior to selecting or receiving any advice from any committee
advisor (other than in-house legal counsel) and on an annual basis thereafter, the HR Committee must assess the independence of such committee advisor in compliance with any applicable NYSE listing rules and
the federal securities laws.  The HR Committee must also review and approve, in
advance, any engagement of any committee compensation consultant by the Company for any services other than providing advice to the Committee regarding executive officer compensation. Code of Ethics The Company has adopted a policy statement entitledCode of Ethics that applies to its Chief Executive Officer and senior financial officers.
In the event that an amendment to, or a waiver from, a provision of theCode of Ethics is made or granted, the Company intends to post such information on its web site,www.lsccom.com. A copy of the
CompanysCode of Ethics has been filed as an exhibit to the Original Form 10-K. Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act) requires the Companys officers and directors, and persons who own
more than ten percent of the common stock of the Company, to file with the SEC reports of ownership of company securities and changes in reported ownership. Officers, directors and greater than ten percent stockholders are required by SEC rules to
furnish the Company with copies of all Section 16(a) reports they file. Based solely on a review of the copies of such forms furnished to the Company,
or written representations from the reporting persons that no Form 5 was required, the Company believes that during 2018, all Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to its officers, directors, and greater than ten percent beneficial
owners were met in a timely manner.  8




---

##### Table of Contents

ITEM 11.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION COMPENSATION DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY In this Compensation Discussion & Analysis (CD&A), we will describe the material components of our executive
compensation program applicable to our named executive officers (our NEOs). While the discussion in this CD&A is focused on our NEOs, many components of our executive compensation program apply broadly across our executive ranks. Our NEOs include:  +
Thomas J. Quinlan III, our Chairman, Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and President;  +
Suzanne S. Bettman, our Chief Administrative Officer and General Counsel;  +
Andrew B. Coxhead, our Chief Financial Officer;  +
Kent A. Hansen, our Chief Accounting Officer and Controller; and  +
Richard T. Lane, our Chief Strategy and Supply Chain Officer. LSCs executive compensation program is designed to strike an appropriate balance among rewarding our executives for strong performance, ensuring long-term
LSC success, considering stockholder interest and encouraging our executive talent to remain with the Company. This CD&A describes LSCs
Compensation Philosophy, the components of our executive compensation program, our decision-making process, our 2018 compensation decisions and other relevant policies and practices. Highlights of the Companys performance as well as our 2018
executive compensation program are described below. 2018 Company Highlights In 2018, LSC successfully:  +
Announced entry into a definitive agreement (the Merger Agreement) to combine in an all-stock transaction with Quad/Graphics, Inc. (the Merger) to create a highly efficient print platform that will strengthen the role of print in a multichannel media world;  +
Generated free cash flow of $99 million;  +
Returned $55 million to stockholders in the form of quarterly dividends of $0.26 per quarter ($35 million)
and stock repurchases ($20 million);  +
Successfully integrated the 2016-2017 acquisitions realizing significant synergies; and  +
Pursued strategic opportunities to strengthen our strategic focus, as described below:  -
Successfully acquired and integrated the acquisition of the Print Logistics business of RR Donnelley;  -
Completed the sale of our European printing business; and  -
Rolled out enhanced service offerings driven by technology and innovation to support book publishers such as order-to-cash, unique identifiers and warehousing and distribution services. 2018 Executive Compensation Program Highlights  +
Robust and Informed Decision-Making Process.The HR Committee, which met 10
times in 2018, has a robust and informed decision-making process which is guided by the LSC Compensation Philosophy. The HR Committee also considers input from its independent compensation consultant.  +
Revised LSC Compensation Philosophy.The HR Committee reviewed the LSC
Compensation Philosophy with its independent compensation consultant, Willis Towers Watson, and made various revisions to better state the HR Committees vision for LSCs compensation program.  +
Benchmarked Compensation Decisions.In general, total compensation levels for the NEOs are
targeted at the 50th percentile of peer group data, when available for a position, and by market survey data. This 50th percentile target level provides a total competitive anchor point for LSCs executive compensation program. Actual
compensation levels vary up or down from targeted levels based on the Companys performance and the individuals role, responsibilities, experience and performance.  +
Stockholder Engagement.LSCs 2018 compensation decisions and planning were impacted
by our solicitation of stockholder feedback and stockholder engagement regarding compensation and other governance matters. Our stockholder engagement plan was put on hold following the announcement of the Merger so as to remain compliant with the
relevant securities law restrictions on solicitations of proxies.  9




---

##### Table of Contents

+ Pay for Performance.  -
Consistent with our pay for performance philosophy, no bonus payments were paid under the Annual Incentive Plan
(AIP) for 2018 to any employee, including the CEO and the other NEOs, as 2018 performance did not meet the EBITDA corporate financial target under the AIP.  -
No changes were made to the NEOs target bonus opportunities under the AIP. + Expansion of the Key Employee Severance Plan in Lieu of Employment
Agreements.The HR Committee determined that each of the NEOs, other than Mr. Quinlan, would be eligible to participate in the Companys Key Employee Severance Plan in order to
standardize and streamline the NEOs existing entitlements under their legacy and inconsistent employment agreements. Each of Ms. Bettman and Messrs. Coxhead, Lane and Hansen agreed to waive their existing legacy employment agreements and
entered into a participation agreement under the Key Employee Severance Plan. LSC COMPENSATION PHILOSOPHY The HR Committee adopted the LSC Compensation Philosophy at the time of the Separation to guide its compensation decisions, and in 2018 reviewed and revised the
philosophy as follows:  We believe that a simple, equitable and transparent executive compensation program that takes into
account industry conditions is critical to the achievement of the financial and operational goals that support our business strategy and are linked to long-term shareholder value creation. Our compensation programs are designed to achieve the
following three objectives:
 LOGO  We will
achieve these three objectives by: 
+  Providing a compensation program that includes base salaries, annual cash incentives, equity
incentives and benefits generally provided to other employees at LSC or similarly-situated executives in our competitive talent market 
+  Targeting compensation levels, in aggregate, at the median (50thpercentile) of the competitive market, which reflects our peer group and compensation survey data 
+  Recognizing that equity compensation is a valuable resourceand allocate equity based on employee
level, contribution, performance and potential 
+  Requiring that executives maintain a meaningful stock ownership interest to align their financial
interests with those of shareholders 
+  Limiting the perquisites and other non-performance-based
elements of the compensation program 
+  Ensuring the plans do not create undue risk taking
 +  Designing the program with
consideration of the industry in which LSC operates and the impact of market conditions
  10




---

##### Table of Contents

COMPENSATION GOVERNANCEWhat We Do

What We Dont Do+Pay for Performance Philosophy.NEO compensation is heavily weighted towards variable pay, and
vesting of equity awards is predominantly performance-based 
+Reasonable Compensation Levels Aligned with Our Pay for Performance Philosophy. Overall
compensation levels are targeted at market median and, where available, peer group target medians, with a range of opportunity to reward strong performance and withhold rewards when Company performance objectives are not achieved
 +Double Trigger Equity
Acceleration Upon a Change-in-Control. All long-term incentive award grants made under our equity plan provide for accelerated vesting upon a change in control only
if the NEO is involuntarily terminated without cause or resigns for good reason (see Compensation Discussion& Analysis - Treatment of Equity Awards in the Merger Agreement for more information on how the Merger will
impact outstanding long-term incentive awards) 
+Executive Stock Ownership Guidelines.The NEOs and certain other executives are expected to hold
LSC stock worth one to five times their base salary (depending on their position) within three years of the date of hire or promotion; in the event an executive does not achieve or make progress toward the required stock ownership level, the HR
Committee has the discretion to take appropriate action 
+Independent Executive Compensation Consultant.The HR Committee regularly consults with an
independent executive compensation consultant on matters surrounding executive officer pay and governance 
+Clawback Policy.The NEOs and all other current or former executive officers are subject to a
Clawback Policy that allows the HR Committee to recoup incentive compensation under certain circumstances 
+Risk Review.The HR Committee regularly reviews and evaluates LSCs executive and employee
compensation practices to ensure that any risks associated with such practices are not likely to have a material adverse effect on LSC 
+Investor Outreach and Engagement.We engage proactively with institutional investors on a number
of topics, including our executive compensation program 
+Prudent Equity Award Practices. Management and the HR Committee evaluate share utilization levels
by reviewing the dilutive impact of stock compensation 
+Use of Tally Sheets.Comprehensive historical and comparative compensation information is
presented to the HR Committee on tally sheets 
+Review of Internal Pay Equity. The HR Committee considers internal pay and gender equity, among
other factors, when making compensation decisions, but does not use a fixed ratio or formula when comparing compensation among executive officers

+No Excise Tax Gross-Ups Upon a
Change-in-Control. The NEOs employment arrangements do not include any gross-ups for excise taxes, and the HR Committee
has determined that any future executive officer arrangements will not include any gross-ups for excise taxes 
+No Payment of Dividends on PSUs or RSUs. Our equity award agreements do not permit the payment or
accrual of dividends or dividend equivalents on performance share units or restricted share units held by employees 
+No Excessive Perquisites.We provide limited benefits and perquisites to our executive
officers  +No Tax Gross-Ups on Perquisites or Any Other Compensation or Benefits.We do not provide tax gross-ups on supplemental benefits or perquisites
 +No Pledging/No Hedging/No Short
Sales.We have a policy that prohibits (and does not provide for exceptions or waivers) employees, directors and certain of their family members from pledging, short sales, trading in publicly traded options, puts or calls, hedging or similar
transactions with respect to LSC stock 
+No Repricings or Cash Buyouts.Our equity plan prohibits repricing (including cash buyouts) of out-of-money options or stock appreciation rights without stockholder approval 
+No Below Market Grants.Our equity plan does not permit option grants below fair market value
 +No Liberal Share Counting.Our equity plan explicitly prohibits the regranting of shares withheld or tendered to pay option exercise prices to satisfy tax obligations, repurchased by LSC with option exercise proceeds, and shares of stock subject to stock appreciation
rights not issued upon settlement 
+No Guaranteed Bonus Arrangements.In keeping with our pay for performance philosophy, annual
bonuses are only paid upon the achievement of pre-defined metrics and goals; they are never guaranteed  11




---

##### Table of Contents

COMPENSATION OVERVIEW The HR Committee determined the 2018 compensation for the NEOs, which was comprised of three major components: base salary, annual incentive compensation and
long-term incentive compensation. In addition, the NEOs were eligible to receive certain benefits and to participate in benefit programs generally available to other employees of LSC. In general, total compensation levels for the NEOs were targeted at the 50th percentile of peer group data, when available for a position, and by market survey
data from the Willis Towers Watson 2017 CDB Executive Compensation Survey Report  U.S. This 50th percentile target level provided a total competitive anchor point for LSCs executive compensation program. Actual compensation levels
varied up or down from targeted levels based on the Companys performance and the individuals role, responsibilities, experience and performance. The table below describes the elements of the executive compensation program for our NEOs.  Component


Description/Rationale

Determining FactorsBase Salary

+  Fixed component of pay 
+  Compensate for roles and responsibilities
 +  Stable compensation element
 +  Intended to be the smallest
component of the overall compensation package, assuming that LSC is achieving or exceeding targeted performance levels for its incentive programs

+  Level of responsibility 
+  Individual skills, experience, role and performance
 +  Median of market and peer group
dataAnnual Incentive Plan (AIP)

+  Variable component of pay 
+  Annual cash bonus plan 
+  Target amount of bonus is determined as a percentage of base salary
 +  Reward achievement against
specific, pre-set annual threshold target (net sales), corporate financial target (EBITDA) and individual performance goals 
+  No payout made unless the annual threshold target is achieved
 +  Award payout ranges from 0% to 128%
of target, with no payout for performance at or below 93% of the corporate financial target 
+  Awards may be adjusted downward by achievement levels of individual performance goals
 +  Annual incentive opportunities
determined during the first quarter of each year

+  Annual threshold target and corporate financial target set at the beginning of the year
 +  Individual performance goals set
for participantsLong-Term Incentive Plan (LTIP)

+  Variable component of pay 
+  Links awards to long-term LSC performance to increase alignment with stockholders
 +  Key component to attract and retain
executives  +  A mix of
performance-based and time-based awards with three-year cliff vesting granted in 2018 
+  Annual value intended to be a substantial component of overall compensation package

+  Level of responsibility 
+  Individual skills, experience and performance
 +  Future potential
 +  Median of peer group and market
survey dataOther Benefits

+  Basic benefits including medical, a 401(k) plan, a frozen pension plan and other broad-based plans
 +  Minimal perquisites with no tax gross-ups 
+  Limited executive-level supplemental benefits including supplemental retirement, supplemental insurance
and deferred compensation plan (which is now closed to additional deferrals)

+  Level of the employee in the organization  12




---

##### Table of Contents

Annual Incentive Plan The threshold and corporate financial targets under the 2018 AIP were set by the HR Committee at the beginning of the year following the presentation of the
annual operating budget to the Companys Board of Directors (the Board). The targets were designed to be challenging. The table below sets forth a description of such targets and the individual performance goals under the AIP.  Target/Goals

MetricThreshold Target

+  $3.2 billion in consolidated net sales for 2018Corporate Financial Target

+  Non-GAAP reported EBITDA of $355 million for 2018 (as
compared Non-GAAP reported EBITDA achieved for 2017 of $328 million); see Financial Review  Non-GAAP Measures in the Original Form 10-K for a reconciliation of net (loss) income to Non-GAAP EBITDA 
+  Defined as net income adjusted for income taxes, interest expense, investment and other income,
depreciation and amortization, restructurings and impairments, acquisition-related expenses and certain other charges or creditsIndividual Performance Goals

+  Varies by individual 
+  Varies year to year, depending upon the individuals key business objectives and areas of
emphasis The 2018 performance payout curve under the AIP was structured as follows:  LOGO Payouts are modified (downward only) by achievement levels on individual performance goals. Given marketplace dynamics and the possibility of unforeseen developments, the HR Committee retains discretion to increase or decrease the amount of
participants AIP awards if it determines prior to the end of the plan year that an adjustment was appropriate to better reflect the actual performance of the Company and/or the participant. The HR Committee also has discretionary authority to
reduce the amount of an AIP award payable to any participant at any time, including after the end of the plan year whether for misconduct or for any other reason.  13




---

##### Table of Contents

Long-Term Incentive Program Our 2016 Amended and Restated Performance Incentive Plan, which was approved by stockholders at our 2017 Annual Meeting, allows the HR Committee to grant
long-term incentive awards (including performance share units (PSUs), restricted share units (RSUs), restricted stock awards (RSAs), stock options, stock appreciation rights (SARs) and long-term
incentive cash awards) to any eligible employee. Long-term incentive awards are granted to directly align the interests of our NEOs with those of our stockholders. In 2018, the HR Committee granted PSUs and RSUs to our NEOs; no RSAs, stock options,
SARs or long-term incentive cash awards were granted. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION DECISION-MAKING PROCESS The HR Committee establishes and monitors LSCs overall compensation strategy to ensure that our executive compensation supports the Companys
business objectives, and oversees and establishes the compensation of the CEO, other senior officers and key management employees. While the HR Committee does not administer or have direct jurisdiction over our employee benefit plans, it reviews
such plans so as to have a better understanding of the Companys overall compensation structure. In carrying out its responsibilities, the HR
Committee is guided by the LSC Compensation Philosophy and also considers the following:  +
Stakeholder and Say on Pay vote feedback;  +
Review of tally sheet information;  +
Internal pay equity;  +
Risk assessment;  +
Peer group data/market for talent;  +
The business judgment and experience of the members of the HR Committee;  +
Guidance and counsel from its independent compensation consultant, Willis Towers Watson; and  +
Recommendations from management. Prior to the consummation of the Merger, under the Merger Agreement, our HR Committee is restricted from making certain compensation changes, including with
respect to our NEOs, without first obtaining the approval of Quad/Graphics, Inc. (Quad) Stakeholders and Say on Pay Vote Feedback In connection with its determinations regarding 2017 NEO compensation and its 2018 compensation planning and decisions, our HR Committee directed a
proactive and robust process described in the below table to garner stockholder feedback in response to the results of our 2017 Say on Pay vote and on other governance topics annually. At meetings held with our stakeholders, we discussed various
governance issues and received feedback on our executive compensation program. This process culminated in important changes to the compensation entitlements of certain of our NEOs, most notably, the removal of the legacy Section 280G excise tax
gross-ups in Mr. Quinlans and Ms. Bettmans legacy employment agreements with RRD that were assigned to the Company in the Separation and certain other enhanced disclosures as described
below. Because of the pendency of the Merger we were not able to hold discussions with stakeholders in 2018.  Say on Pay Feedback

+  The Companys 2018 Say on Pay vote received the support of approximately 95.54% of our
stockholdersStockholder Engagement

+  During our engagement process throughout Fall 2017, the Company contacted and offered governance
meetings to various constituencies as well as to 12 of our significant institutional investors, representing approximately 38% of our outstanding shares; five of those investors (or approximately 20% of our shares outstanding) desired to meet with
us  +  At these meetings, members
of management discussed various governance issues and received feedback on our executive compensation program 
+  Our stockholder engagement plan was put on hold following the announcement of the Merger so as to remain
compliant with the relevant securities law restrictions on solicitations of proxies.  14




---

##### Table of Contents

HR Committee Assessment

+  These engagement efforts informed the HR Committees discussions and allowed the HR Committee to
better assess stakeholder views 
+  Stockholders gave us positive feedback concerning the structure of our executive compensation program,
especially around the thoughtful use of performance-based compensation components 
+  As a result of its evaluation, the HR Committee received some feedback that highlighted two areas of
focus that were addressed prior to the 2017 proxy statement: 
-Excise Tax Gross-Ups: Various stakeholders expressed
concern regarding the legacy Section 280G excise tax gross-ups that had carried over when Mr. Quinlans and Ms. Bettmans employment agreements with RRD were assigned to the Company in
the Separation  -Enhanced
Disclosure: Certain stakeholders sought additional clarity pertaining to several elements of our 2017 CD&A disclosures, especially as they related to the Companys Clawback Policy and certain issues related to equity grantsHR Committee Actions

+  After considering the feedback from stakeholders, and receiving input from Willis Towers Watson, the HR
Committee determined to: 
-Remove Excise Tax Gross-Ups: Amend the employment
agreements with each of Mr. Quinlan and Ms. Bettman to remove the legacy Section 280G excise tax gross-ups in their employment agreements, which were replaced with a net-better cutback (which provides for a cut-back to the extent necessary to eliminate the excise tax if such cut-back
would put the executive in a better after-tax position than paying the excise tax) 
-Enhanced Disclosure: Revise the structure of and disclosures in the CD&A to better highlight
the Companys best practices and policies 
+  In addition to the actions implemented prior to the 2017 proxy statement, other feedback given by the
stakeholders informed the 2018 decisions made by the HR Committee Review of Tally Sheet Information Along with performance and the other relevant factors discussed in this CD&A, the HR Committee generally considers the following information, which is
presented on a tally sheet for each NEO when setting compensation:  +
The targeted values of base salary, annual cash incentive (at various levels of goal attainment) and equity
grants (at grant date value and market value on the date of review) as compared to survey data and, where available, peer group proxy data;  +
Total and realized compensation for the current and prior years;  +
Annual incentive targets and amounts achieved for the current and prior years; and  +
The grant date and current market value of unvested equity awards. In general, total compensation levels for the NEOs are targeted at the 50th percentile of peer group data, when available for a position, and by market survey
data. This 50th percentile target level provides a total competitive anchor point for LSCs executive compensation program. Actual compensation levels vary up or down from targeted levels based on the Companys performance and the
individuals role, responsibilities, experience and performance. Reviewing the information presented on the tally sheets assists the HR Committee in
understanding the total compensation being delivered to and the long-term retentive elements in place for NEOs. Internal Pay Equity The HR Committee considers internal pay equity, among other factors, when making compensation decisions, but does not use a fixed ratio or formula
when comparing compensation among executive officers. Mr. Quinlan, our CEO, is compensated at a higher level than other executive officers due to his
higher level of responsibility, authority, accountability and experience. The HR Committee believes that Mr. Quinlans 2018 target total direct compensation was reasonable and appropriate in relation to the compensation targeted for the
other NEOs and to one another. Risk Assessment With assistance from Willis Towers Watson, the HR Committee reviewed and evaluated LSCs executive and employee compensation practices and concluded, based
on this review, that any risks associated with such practices are not likely to have a material adverse effect on LSC. The determination primarily took into account the balance of cash and equity payouts, the balance of annual and long-term
incentives, the type of performance metrics used, incentive plan payout leverage, possibility that the plan designs could be structured in ways that might encourage gamesmanship, avoidance of uncapped rewards, multi-year vesting for equity awards,
use of stock ownership requirements for senior management and the HR Committees oversight of our executive compensation program.  15




---

##### Table of Contents

Peer Group Data/Market for Talent The HR Committee reviews the competitive market for talent as part of its review of our compensation programs effectiveness in attracting and retaining
talent, and to help determine our NEOs compensation. Willis Towers Watson assisted the HR Committee in the creation of a peer group for LSC in 2016.
The primary focus of this process was on industrial companies of generally similar or larger size, complexity and scope rather than companies only in LSCs industry, since the Company is significantly larger than many of its direct competitors
and our markets for talent are necessarily broader. Willis Towers Watsons analysis looked at companies in comparable industries and of a size of revenue between one-half to two times the size of our
revenue. The HR Committee, with input from management, suggested changes to the broad group before finalization. The peer group is reviewed annually by the HR Committee with assistance from Willis Towers Watson. In 2018, four companies were removed
from the peer group as they were acquired, announced a transaction to be acquired or filed for bankruptcy (Essendant Inc., KapStone Paper and Packaging Corporation, Time Inc. and Cenveo, Inc.) and two additional companies were added (R. R.
Donnelley & Sons Company and Deluxe Corporation). The resulting peer group is comprised of the following 20 companies:  ACCO Brands Corporation

Albemarle Corporation

Ashland Global Holdings, Inc.Avery Dennison Corporation

Bemis Company, Inc.

Deluxe CorporationDomtar Corporation

Gannett & Co.

Graphic Packaging Holding CompanyOwens-Illinois, Inc.

Packaging Corporation of America

Pitney Bowes, Inc.PolyOne Corporation

Quad/Graphics, Inc.

R. R. Donnelley & Sons CompanySealed Air Corporation

Silgan Holdings, Inc.

Sonoco Products Co.Transcontinental, Inc.

W. R. Grace & Co. Role of the Compensation Consultant The HR Committee again retained Willis Towers Watson in 2018 as its outside executive compensation consultant to provide objective analysis, advice and
recommendations on executive officer pay in connection with the HR Committees decision-making process. Willis Towers Watson was also hired to assist in the calculation of the CEO pay ratio and to assist the HR Committee in reviewing this
CD&A. Willis Towers Watson regularly attends HR Committee meetings and reports directly to the HR Committee, not to management, on matters relating to compensation for the executive officers and for directors. While Willis Towers Watson provides additional services to the Company other than those under the direction of the HR Committee, all services have all been
approved by the HR Committee. The HR Committee has reviewed the non-HR Committee work and services provided by Willis Towers Watson and determined that (1) those services were provided on an independent
basis and (2) no conflicts of interest exist. Factors considered by the HR Committee in its assessment included: (i) other services provided to LSC by Willis Towers Watson; (ii) fees paid by LSC as a percentage of Willis Towers
Watsons total revenue; (iii) Willis Towers Watsons policies and procedures that are designed to prevent a conflict of interest and maintain independence between the personnel who provide HR Committee services and those who provide
these other non-HR Committee services; (iv) any business or personal relationships between individual consultants involved in the engagement and HR Committee members; (v) whether any LSC stock is
owned by individual consultants involved in the engagement; and (vi) any business or personal relationships between LSCs executive officers and Willis Towers Watson or the individual consultants involved in the engagement. Role of Management The Companys
management, including the CEO, develops preliminary recommendations regarding compensation matters with respect to the executive officers other than the CEO, and provides these recommendations to the HR Committee for its review. Managements
recommendations focus on, among other things, experience, performance, job responsibilities, future potential and accomplishments. With respect to the AIP, the CEO has a discussion with the HR Committee on the payouts for the other NEOs, including a
discussion on performance against individual performance goals. The HR Committee reviews managements recommendations but makes all final
compensation decisions for LSCs executive officers. Management is responsible for the administration of the compensation programs once the HR Committees decisions are finalized. 2018 COMPENSATION DECISIONS The LSC
Compensation Philosophy and structure of the executive compensation program were applied consistently to all NEOs. Total compensation was targeted at the 50th percentile of peer group data, when available for a position, and by market survey data.
Any differences in compensation levels and mix that exist among the NEOs are primarily due to differences in market practices for similar positions and the responsibility, scope, future potential and complexity of the NEOs role at LSC.  16




---

##### Table of Contents

Thomas J. Quinlan III
 Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and
President

Key ResponsibilitiesOur Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and
President is responsible for managing our business operations and overseeing our senior leaders. He leads the implementation of corporate policy and strategy and is the primary liaison between our Board and the management of the Company. In addition
to his role as the leader of our organization and people, he also serves as the primary public face of the Company.2018 Target Annual Compensation MixLOGOSuzanne S. Bettman
 Chief Administrative
Officer and General Counsel

Key ResponsibilitiesOur Chief Administrative Officer and General
Counsel is responsible for managing the Companys administrative functions and overseeing the Companys legal department. She also has responsibility for one of the Companys business units and serves as the Chief Compliance Officer
and as the Companys Corporate Secretary.2018 Target Annual Compensation MixLOGOAndrew B. Coxhead
 Chief Financial Officer

Key ResponsibilitiesOur Chief Financial Officer is responsible for
managing the Companys overall financial condition, including our capitalization and our funding and liquidity profile. He is also responsible for financial analysis and reporting. He is the primary liaison to our investors.2018 Target Annual Compensation MixLOGO  17




---

##### Table of Contents

Kent A. Hansen
 Chief Accounting Officer
and Controller

Key ResponsibilitiesOur Chief Accounting Officer and Controller is
responsible for managing the Companys shared services centers, SEC reporting and compliance with US GAAP, our credit and collections departments and is also extensively involved in M&A due diligence, accounting and integration.2018 Target Annual Compensation MixLOGORichard T. Lane
 Chief Strategy and
Supply Chain Officer

Key ResponsibilitiesOur Chief Strategy and Supply Chain Officer is
responsible for implementing the Companys strategy, manages the M&A function, leads the Companys strategic sourcing efforts and has operational responsibility for the Companys book segment.2018 Target Annual Compensation MixLOGO Base Salary The HR Committee did not increase the base salaries of any of our NEOs in 2018 other than Messrs. Lane and Hansen. Mr. Lane was awarded an increase of
$50,000 to his base salary in consideration of his expanded operational role with responsibility for the Companys book segment. Mr. Hansen was awarded an increase of $40,000 to his base salary to position his compensation closer to the
median compensation of the survey data. For 2018, after such increases, the NEOs base salaries were as follows: for Mr. Quinlan, $1,200,000; for Ms. Bettman, $540,000; for Mr. Coxhead, $540,000; for Mr. Hansen, $325,000 and
for Mr. Lane, $450,000. Annual Incentive Plan The HR Committee did not make any changes to the NEOs AIP targets as a percentage of base salary. The AIP targets are 150% for Mr. Quinlan and
Ms. Bettman, 100% for Messrs. Coxhead and Lane and 75% for Mr. Hansen. The HR Committee reviewed the 2018 results and the Companys
performance against the net sales and non-GAAP EBITDA goals established and required to be met for the AIP to be funded. For 2018, the net sales goal was met. The target reported EBITDA goal was
$355 million (with the minimum goal of $330 million and a maximum goal of $369 million), with actual results of $276 million (see Financial Review  Non-GAAP Measures in the Original
Form 10-K for a reconciliation of net (loss) income to Non-GAAP EBITDA). Consistent with our pay for performance philosophy, given that 2018 performance did not meet the
EBITDA corporate financial target under the AIP, no annual bonus payments were paid under the AIP for 2018 to any employee, including the CEO and the other NEOs. Accordingly, the HR Committee did not need to adjudicate individual performance goals
for the NEOs. Long-Term Incentive Program With respect to 2018 compensation decisions, the HR Committee had a series of discussions regarding the most appropriate way to motivate and retain its
executives while still maintaining a continued focus on producing strong operating results. The HR Committee believes it is important to use equity incentives to provide alignment with stockholders, to emphasize long-term performance and to ensure
continuity of senior leadership. Consistent with the LSC Compensation Philosophy, the HR Committee determined that the value of the 2018 long-term
incentive plan grants for Messrs. Lane and Hansen would be equal to the value of their 2017 grants, the value of Mr. Coxheads 2018 grant was reduced by $150,000 from his 2017 grant and the value of Ms. Bettmans 2018 grant was
reduced by $135,000 from her 2017 grant, in each case to align such NEOs compensation more closely with the median long-term incentive compensation of the peer group and survey data.  18




---

##### Table of Contents

In consideration of Mr. Quinlans 2016 Founders Award, the HR Committee, in 2017, chose not
to grant to Mr. Quinlan a long-term incentive plan equity award in 2017. However, Mr. Quinlan did receive a long-term incentive grant in 2018 consistent with the peer group data and market practice. See Executive Compensation  Grants of Plan-Based Awardsfor details concerning grants made to each NEO in 2018. The 2018 long-term incentive grants for the NEOs consisted of:  Performance Share Units

Restricted Share Units+  Granted at a weighting of 50% of total long-term equity awards (assuming performance at 100% of the
performance-based financial target) 
+  Cliff vest at the end of three years if performance metrics achieved, unless employment terminated for
other than death or disability 
-   Upon a change in control, performance would be deemed earned at the greater of target and actual
performance and would continue to be subject to time-based vesting 
-   Following a change in control, PSUs would vest upon a termination without cause or for good
reason  +  Based on the achievement
of a three-year pre-set performance-based financial target of cumulative free cash flow 
-   Payout started at 75% of target (equating to a 50% payout) and scaled to 100% for 100%
achievement of target -   Maximum opportunity for a 120% payout for 110% achievement of
target  +  Do not accrue
dividends

+  Granted at a weighting of 50% of the total 2018 long-term equity awards (assuming performance at 100% of
the PSU performance-based financial target) 
+  Cliff vest at the end of three years, unless employment terminated for other than death or
disability  -   Following a
change in control, RSUs would vest upon termination without cause or for good reason 
+  Equivalent in value to one share of the Companys common stock and settled in stock
 +  Do not accrue
dividends Perquisites In 2017, the HR Committee determined to extend the benefit of Company-paid supplemental long-term disability and life insurance effective 2018 to each of
Messrs. Coxhead, Hansen and Lane to align with the benefits already afforded to Mr. Quinlan and Ms. Bettman. The premium cost for these supplemental benefits is included as taxable income for the NEOs and there is no tax gross-up on these benefits. TREATMENT OF EQUITY AWARDS IN THE MERGER AGREEMENT The completion of the Merger will impact the compensation that we awarded to our NEOs in 2018 and prior years. In particular, upon the completion of the Merger,
outstanding equity awards will be treated as follows:   Component

Treatment in the Merger AgreementOptions

+  Converted into stock options over Quad shares, with the number of Quad shares and the exercise price
adjusted based on the exchange ratio under the Merger Agreement 
+  Remain governed by the same terms and conditions applicable to such optionsRSAs

+  Automatically accelerated and converted into, and become exchanged for, the merger consideration as
further described in the Merger AgreementRSUs

+  Automatically accelerated, cancelled and entitle the holder to receive the merger consideration as
further described in the Merger AgreementPSUs

+  Automatically accelerated, cancelled and entitle the holder to receive an amount of merger
consideration, as determined below: 
-   2017 PSUs: based on performance, as determined by the HR Committee, at the end of the performance
period  -   2018 PSUs: based
on the higher of target and actual performance, as determined by the HR Committee, as of the closing of the Merger  19




---

##### Table of Contents

Any RSUs granted in 2019 (after the date of the Merger Agreement) will be converted into RSUs over Quad
shares, with the number of Quad shares based on the exchange ratio under the Merger Agreement and will not be automatically accelerated. For more
information, see the section entitled The MergerInterests of LSCs Executive Officers and Directors in the Merger set forth in the joint proxy statement/prospectus filed by Quad/Graphics, Inc. with the SEC on
January 15, 2019. If the Merger is not consummated, the equity awards will remain outstanding and subject to vesting pursuant to their original terms. OTHER POLICIES AND PRACTICES Benefit Programs LSCs benefit programs are established based upon an assessment of competitive market factors and a determination of what is needed to retain high-caliber
executives. Primary benefits for executive officers include participation in LSCs broad-based plans at the same benefit levels as other employees, including: retirement plans, savings plans, health and dental plans and various insurance plans,
including disability and life insurance. LSC also provides certain executives, including certain of the NEOs, with the following benefits:  +
Supplemental Retirement Plan: Because RRD froze its qualified retirement
plans as of December 31, 2011, generally no additional benefits accrue under such plans or the related supplemental retirement plan as each were transferred to LSC in the Separation. LSC maintains the frozen supplemental retirement
plan for eligible employees (which includes approximately 589 (active and inactive) employees including certain of the NEOs).  +
Supplemental Insurance: Supplemental life and long-term disability insurance
is provided to all NEOs to enhance the value of LSCs overall compensation program. The premium cost for these supplemental benefits is included as taxable income for the NEOs and there is no tax gross-up
on these benefits.  +
Deferred Compensation Plan: LSCs deferred compensation plan is not
accepting additional deferrals. However, the Company maintains the plan, including existing balances, investment options and previous deferral elections, for eligible participants, including certain of the NEOs.  +
Limited Perquisites:Our NEOs receive limited perquisites. Taxes on all
perquisites are the sole responsibility of the NEO. The HR Committee believes that these perquisites are important for retention and recruitment purposes. LSC reimburses expenses for financial counseling services to provide certain NEOs access to an
independent financial advisor of their choice. The cost of these services, if utilized, is included as taxable income for the NEOs. A monthly automobile allowance provides eligible executives with an opportunity to use their car for both business
and personal use in an efficient manner. If utilized, this allowance is included as taxable income for the NEOs. Mr. Lane receives reimbursement for monthly dues and business entertainment expenses for a country club membership utilized to
entertain customers and suppliers. The reimbursement for monthly dues is not included as taxable income to him. LSC had a fractional ownership interest in a private plane until February 2018. In 2018, there was no personal use of the plane. Specific
executive officer perquisites are listed in the footnotes to the 2018 Summary Compensation Table. Post-Termination
Benefits The HR Committee reviewed the post-termination benefits available to the NEOs and other executives in 2018. The HR Committee believes that
severance benefits and change in control benefits are necessary in order to attract and retain the caliber and quality of executives that the Company needs in its most senior positions. These benefits are particularly important in our consolidating
industry, as they provide for continuity of senior management and help our executives focus on results and strategic initiatives. In early 2018, the HR
Committee determined that Ms. Bettman and Messrs. Coxhead, Hansen and Lane would be eligible to participate in the Companys Key Employee Severance Plan (which was originally adopted by the HR Committee in October 2017) if they each agreed
to waive any existing legacy employment agreements and severance entitlements, which each subsequently did. Consequently, each of our NEOs, other than Mr. Quinlan, is party to a participation agreement under and is a participant in the Key
Employee Severance Plan rather than to an individual employment agreement with the Company. Mr. Quinlan remains a party to his employment agreement with the Company, as amended in 2017 to remove his legacy Section 280G excise tax gross-up. Each of the NEOs agreements provide for severance payments and benefits if termination occurs without
cause or for good reason. Each of our NEOs is also eligible to receive additional compensation if he or she is terminated in connection with or following a change in control. However, all such payments are
double trigger (requiring both a change in control and a qualifying termination). Additional information regarding severance and change in
control payments, including definitions of the key terms and a quantification of benefits that would have been received by our NEOs had a termination occurred on December 31, 2018, is found under Potential Payments upon Termination or Change
in Control. Stock Ownership Guidelines The HR Committee has established stock ownership guidelines for the NEOs and certain other executives. These guidelines are designed to encourage LSCs
executives to have a meaningful equity ownership in LSC, thereby linking their interests with those of our stockholders. These stock ownership guidelines provide that, within three years of becoming an executive, each executive must own (by  20




---

##### Table of Contents

a combination of shares owned outright, shares owned through LSCs 401(k) plan and shares of unvested
RSAs and unvested RSUs, but excluding unexercised stock options or PSUs) shares of LSC common stock with a value of 5x base salary for the CEO, 3x base salary for the NEOs other than the CEO and 1x base salary for all other executives covered by the
guidelines. Failure to achieve or make progress toward the guidelines shall be cause for review of such executives right to future participation in stock grants and/or affect future long-term incentive award payouts. As of April 3, 2019,
all of our NEOs had met, exceeded or made appropriate progress toward their applicable stock ownership guidelines. Tax Deductibility Policy The HR Committee considers the deductibility of compensation for federal income tax purposes in the design of LSCs compensation programs.
While LSC generally seeks to maintain the deductibility of the incentive compensation paid to its executive officers to the maximum extent permitted under applicable law, the HR Committee believes it is important to preserve and retain the
flexibility necessary to provide cash and equity compensation in line with competitive practices, the LSC Compensation Philosophy, and the best interests of LSC stockholders even if amounts are not fully tax deductible. Section 162(m) of the
Internal Revenue Code generally imposes a $1 million limit on the amount a public company may deduct for compensation paid to the companys covered employees, which include our NEOs. The HR Committee is cognizant of and
continually considers the impact of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, which expanded the number of individuals covered by Section 162(m) and eliminated the exception for performance-based compensation (generally effective beginning with our
2018 tax year) on the Companys compensation programs and design. As a result of the changes to Section 162(m), the HR Committee anticipates that the portion of future compensation paid to our NEOs in excess of $1 million will not be
deductible, unless it qualifies for transition relief applicable to the grandfathered arrangement in place as of November 2, 2017. Clawback Policy The Companys Clawback Policy, which is reviewed annually by the HR Committee, allows the Company to seek
reimbursement of incentive compensation paid or awarded to current or former executive officers of the Company where:  +
The individual from whom disgorgement is sought was an executive officer at the time of the incentive
compensation payment or award or the vesting of such award;  +
The payment of a bonus or equity award (or the vesting of such award) was predicated upon the achievement of
financial results that were subsequently the subject of a restatement due to material noncompliance (other than as a result of a change in applicable accounting principles) of the Company with any financial reporting requirement under the federal
securities laws as a result of misconduct on the part of the executive officer from whom the reimbursement is sought;  +
A lower payment or award would have been made to such executive officer based upon the restated financial
results; and  +
The incentive compensation payment or award or the vesting of such award occurred during the three-year period
preceding the date on which the Company first disclosed that it is or will be required to prepare an accounting restatement. The amount
subject to clawback is the portion of the incentive compensation paid for or during the three-year period that is greater than the amount that would have been paid or received had the financial results been properly reported. In addition,
outstanding equity awards where the HR Committee considered the financial performance in granting such awards which performance was subsequently reduced due to a restatement may be cancelled in whole or in part at the HR Committees discretion.
Incentive compensation subject to the Clawback Policy includes bonuses, stock option grants and performance shares or other performance-based awards under the Companys equity incentive program, but does not include restricted stock or similar
awards subject to only time-based vesting. No Hedging, No Pledging and No Short Sales LSCs Insider Trading and Window Period Policy prohibits all employees, directors and certain of their family members from engaging in any of the following
transactions: pledging securities whether as collateral for a loan or otherwise, holding securities in a margin account, short sales, trading in publicly traded options, puts or calls, hedging or any similar transactions or arrangements with respect
to LSC securities. The policy does not provide for any exceptions or waivers. HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE REPORT The Human Resources Committee, on behalf of the Board, establishes and monitors LSCs overall compensation strategy to ensure that executive officer
compensation supports the Companys business objectives. In fulfilling its oversight responsibilities, the Human Resources Committee reviewed and discussed with management the Compensation Discussion& Analysis
section set forth above. In reliance on the review and discussions referred to above, the Human Resources Committee recommended to the Board that the
Compensation Discussion& Analysis be incorporated in an amendment to LSCs Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018. Human Resources Committee Francis J. Jules, Chairman M. Shân Atkins Thomas F. OToole Douglas W. Stotlar  21




---

##### Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION 2018 SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE The 2018 Summary Compensation Table provides compensation information about our principal
executive officer, principal financial officer and the three most highly compensated executive officers (other than the principal executive officer and principal financial officer) (the Named Executive Officers or NEOs) as of
December 31, 2018. The information set forth below with respect to the year ended December 31, 2016 for all NEOs includes compensation received from RRD prior to the Separation combined with compensation received from LSC following the
Separation.  Name and Principal
Position (a)

Year(b)


Salary
($) (c)


Bonus($) (d)(1)


StockAwards
($) (e)(2)


OptionAwards($) (f)

Non-EquityIncentive
PlanCompensation($)
(g)(3)


Change inPension
Value andNonqualifiedDeferredCompensationEarnings
($) (h)(4)


All OtherCompensation($) (i)(5)



Total
($) (j)Thomas J. Quinlan III
Chairman, Chief Executive
Officer and
President(6)


2018



1,200,000



0



3,099,961





0



0



37,709



4,337,6702017



1,200,000



0









0



115,374



35,109



1,350,4832016



1,200,000



0



11,149,766





162,000



64,820



32,763



12,609,349Suzanne S. Bettman
Chief Administrative Officer
and General
Counsel(7)


2018



540,000



0



599,871





0



0



22,858



1,162,7282017



540,000



900,000



779,833





0



62,101



22,858



2,304,7922016



509,999



725,000



1,850,252





72,900



30,449



31,498



3,220,098Andrew B. Coxhead
Chief Financial
Officer(8)


2018



540,000



0



724,889





0



0



12,479



1,277,3682017



540,000



533,334



928,711





0



42,051







2,044,0962016



378,750



458,333



1,003,351





48,600



8,522







1,897,556Kent A. Hansen
Chief Accounting Officer
and Controller(9)


2018



325,000



0



149,968





0







11,124



486,0922017



285,000



0



158,919





0











443,9192016



91,761



100,000



284,982





6,348











483,091Richard T. Lane
Chief Strategy and Supply
Chain Officer(10)


2018



450,000



0



399,869





0



0



34,909



884,7772017



400,000



364,363



424,548





0



53,153



13,085



1,255,1492016



385,000



146,643



684,379





36,000



30,213



12,293



1,294,528  1
The Company did not award any bonuses in 2018.  2
The amounts shown in this column constitute the aggregate grant date fair value of restricted share units
(RSUs) and performance stock units (PSUs) granted during the 2018 fiscal year under the Amended and Restated LSC 2016 Performance Incentive Plan (the LSC PIP). The amounts are valued in accordance with Financial
Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718, Compensation  Stock Compensation(ASC Topic 718). See Note 17 to the Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements included in the Original Form
10-K for a discussion of the relevant assumptions used in calculating the fair value pursuant to ASC Topic 718. The amounts shown exclude the impact of estimated forfeitures related to service-based vesting
conditions. See also Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End. The values in the table below and included above in the 2018 Summary Compensation Table are included at 100% of target, but any
unearned shares will be forfeited.  Type of Award

Thomas      Quinlan


Suzanne    Bettman


AndrewCoxhead


KentHansen


RichardLaneLSC RSUs


$1,549,980



$299,935



$362,444



$74,984



$199,934LSC PSUs


$1,549,980



$299,935



$362,444



$74,984



$199,934
  3
The HR Committee reviewed the 2018 results and the Companys performance against the adjusted EBITDA goal
established for the AIP and determined that performance did not meet the minimum corporate financial target required for a payout and therefore no payouts were made under the AIP for 2018. See Compensation Discussion&
Analysisfor further information.  4
The amounts shown in this column include the aggregate of the increase, if any, in actuarial values of each of
the NEOs benefits under our pension plans and supplemental pension plans. RRD did not have a pension plan open to new participants when Mr. Hansen was hired by RRD, so he is not a participant in our pension plan or supplemental pension
plan and has no benefits under either plan. Each of the other NEOs had a decrease in actuarial value in 2018 in the following amounts: Mr. Quinlan, $77,740; Ms. Bettman, $40,417; Mr. Coxhead, $20,923 and Mr. Lane, $25,352.  5
This amount includes the value of the following: (a) interest of $14,078 (calculated at the prime interest
rate) in the aggregate that was contributed by LSC in 2018 to Mr. Quinlans Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan-B account and (b) the following perquisites and insurance premiums paid by the
Company for group term life and supplemental disability shown in the table below. LSC does not provide a tax gross-up on these benefits.  Named Executive Officer

Corporate Auto        Allowance

Club Membership    Dues

Supplemental Life    Insurance Premium

Supplemental    Disability InsurancePremiumThomas J. Quinlan III

16,800

N/A

2,290

4,540Suzanne S. Bettman

16,800

N/A

1,690

4,368Andrew B. Coxhead

N/A

N/A

3,875

8,604Kent A. Hansen

N/A

N/A

3,575

7,549Richard T. Lane

N/A

13,085

12,355

9,469
  6
Mr. Quinlan served as Chief Executive Officer of RRD until September 30, 2016 and assumed the
responsibilities of Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of LSC at the time of the Separation.  22




---

##### Table of Contents

7
Ms. Bettman served as Executive Vice President, General Counsel, Corporate Secretary and Chief Compliance
Officer of RRD until September 30, 2016 and assumed the responsibilities of Chief Administrative Officer and General Counsel of LSC at the time of the Separation.  8
Mr. Coxhead served as Senior Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer of RRD until September 30, 2016
and assumed the responsibilities of Chief Financial Officer of LSC at the time of the Separation.  9
Mr. Hansen was hired by RRD on September 6, 2016 and assumed the responsibilities of Chief Accounting
Officer and Controller of LSC at the time of the Separation.  10
Mr. Lane served as Executive Vice President  Global Business Solutions of RRD until
September 30, 2016 and assumed the responsibilities of Chief Strategy and Supply Chain Officer of LSC at the time of the Separation. GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS The table below shows additional information regarding awards granted during the year ended
December 31, 2018 under LSCs performance incentive plans, including (i) the threshold, target and maximum level of annual cash incentive awards for the NEOs for performance during 2018, as established by the HR Committee in February
2018, (ii) the PSUs granted in February 2018 under the LSC PIP and (iii) the RSUs granted in February 2018 under the LSC PIP. See Compensation Discussion& Analysis  Long Term Incentive Program for a more
detailed discussion of certain of the awards discussed in the following table. Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table  Name
(a)




Estimated Future
Payouts Under Non-EquityIncentive Plan 
Awards(1)


Estimated FuturePayouts Under EquityIncentive Plan Awards(2)


All OtherStock Awards:Number ofShares ofStock orUnits (#)(i)(3)


Grant DateFair Valueof
Stockand OptionAwards($)(l)(4)Grant
Date(b)


Threshold(5)
($)(c)

Target
($)(d)


Maximum
($)(e)


Threshold
(#)(f)


Target
(#)(g)


Maximum
(#)(h)Thomas J. Quinlan III








1,800,000



2,700,000



















2/26/18

























114,930


$
1,549,9802/26/18













57,465



114,930



137,916






$
1,549,980Suzanne S. Bettman








810,000



1,215,000



















2/26/18

























22,240



299,9352/26/18













11,120



22,240



26,688







299,935Andrew B. Coxhead








540,000



810,000



















2/26/18

























26,875



362,4442/26/18













13,438



26,875



32,250







362,444Kent A. Hansen








243,750



365,625



















2/26/18

























5,560



74,9842/26/18













2,780



5,560



6,672







74,984Richard T. Lane








450,000



675,000



















2/26/18

























14,825



199,9342/26/18













7,413



14,825



17,790







199,934  1
In each case, the amount actually earned by each NEO is reported as
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation in the 2018 Summary Compensation Table. In 2018, the year to date performance did not merit the receipt of any non-equity
incentive plan compensation under the AIP. Thus, no payouts were made under the AIP to any of our NEOs for 2018. See Compensation Discussion& Analysis for further information.  2
Consists of PSUs awarded under the LSC PIP, which may be earned upon the achievement of a specified three-year
free cash flow target beginning on January 1, 2018 and ending on December 31, 2020. Each PSU is equivalent to one share of the Companys common stock on the date of grant. The minimum target must be reached in order for the holder to
be entitled to receive any PSUs. Between 50% to 120% of the number of PSUs granted may be earned, depending on actual performance against specified target levels. The PSUs have no dividend or voting rights. See Compensation
Discussion& Analysisfor further information on the equity grants and Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control.  3
Consists of RSUs awarded under the LSC PIP. Each RSU is equivalent to one share of Company common stock and the
awards vest in full on March 2, 2021. The RSUs have no dividend or voting rights and are payable on a 1:1 ratio in shares of common stock of the Company upon vesting. See Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control.  4
Grant date fair value with respect to the PSUs and the RSUs is determined in accordance with ASC Topic 718. See
Note 17 to the Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements included in the Original Form 10-K for a discussion of the relevant assumptions used in calculating the fair value pursuant to ASC Topic
718. The amounts shown exclude the impact of estimated forfeitures related to service-based vesting conditions. See Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-Endfor further information on these awards.  5
The AIP begins to fund above the threshold, which is set at 93% of target. See Compensation
Discussion& Analysis for more information.  23




---

##### Table of Contents

OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR-END The table below shows (i) each grant of stock options that are unexercised and outstanding and (ii) the aggregate number of unvested RSUs, PSUs, and
restricted stock awards (RSAs) outstanding for the NEOs as of December 31, 2018. Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End Table  Name(a)

Number ofSecuritiesUnderlyingUnexercisedOptionsExercisable(#)(b)


Number
of  Securities  Underlying  Unexercised  Options  Unexercisable  (#)(c)

Option  Exercise  Price  ($)(e)

OptionExpirationDate(f)


Number ofShares orUnits
ofStock That HaveNot Vested(#)(g)(1)


MarketValue ofShares orUnits ofStockThat HaveNot Vested($)(h)(2)


EquityIncentivePlan Awards:Number ofUnearnedShares,
Units orOther RightsThat HaveNot
Vested(#)(i)(3)


EquityIncentivePlan Awards:Market orPayout Valueof UnearnedShares,
Units orOther RightsThat HaveNot
Vested($)(j)(4)Thomas J. Quinlan III


44,500




26.29


3/1/2022















25,000




36.99


2/27/2021















37,500




39.52


2/25/2020















118,750




14.09


3/1/2019



























366,806



2,567,642



174,647



1,222,529Suzanne S. Bettman














70,116



490,812



49,527



346,689Andrew B. Coxhead














55,873



391,111



53,240



372,680Kent A. Hansen














8,150



57,050



12,278



85,946Richard T. Lane














32,849



229,943



28,192



197,344  Note:
Multiple awards have been aggregated where the expiration date and the exercise price of the instruments are
identical. See Compensation Discussion& Analysis contained in the
Companys 2017 proxy statement for information concerning the treatment of RRD equity in connection with the Separation.  1
The following table provides information with respect to the vesting schedule of each NEOs outstanding
unvested RSUs over shares of common stock that are set forth in the above table.  Vesting Date

Thomas Quinlan

Suzanne Bettman

Andrew Coxhead

Kent Hansen

Richard Lane3/2/2019



251,876




35,186




13,888




0




11,1143/2/2020



0




12,690




15,110




2,590




6,9103/2/2021



114,930




22,240




26,875




5,560




14,825
  2
Assumes a closing price per share of LSC of $7.00 on December 31, 2018 (the last trading day of the year).  3
For Mr. Quinlan, represents (i) 59,717 RSAs remaining from his 2016 Founders Award, which will vest
on October 1, 2019 subject to continued employment and (ii) 114,930 PSUs from a grant on February 26, 2018, which are earned for achieving a specified non-GAAP Free Cash Flow target over a three-year
period ending December 31, 2020 (the 2018 PSUs), subject to continued employment. For Ms. Bettman,
represents (i) 12,057 RSAs remaining from her 2016 Founders Award, which will vest on October 1, 2019 subject to continued employment, (ii) 15,230 RSAs from a grant on February 27, 2017 (for which performance through
December 31, 2017 was certified by the HR Committee, with performance achievement certified at 120% of target), which will cliff vest on March 2, 2020 (the 2017 RSAs), subject to continued employment and (iii) 22,240 PSUs
remaining from her grant of 2018 PSUs, which will vest on March 2, 2021, subject to continued employment. For Mr. Coxhead,
represents (i) 8,225 RSAs remaining from his 2016 Founders Award, which will vest on October 1, 2019 subject to continued employment, (ii) 18,140 RSAs remaining from his grant of 2017 RSAs, which will vest on March 2, 2020 subject to
continued employment and (iii) 26,875 PSUs remaining from his grant of 2018 PSUs, which will vest on March 2, 2021 subject to continued employment. For Mr. Hansen, represents (i) 3,618 RSAs remaining from his Founders Award, which will vest on October 1, 2019 subject to
continued employment, (ii) 3,100 RSAs remaining from his grant of 2017 RSAs, which will vest on March 2, 2020 subject to continued employment and (iii) 5,560 PSUs remaining from his grant of 2018 PSUs, which will vest on March 2, 2021
subject to continued employment. For Mr. Lane, represents (i) 5,077 RSAs remaining from his 2016 Founders Award, which will vest
on October 1, 2019 subject to continued employment, (ii) 8,290 RSAs remaining from his grant of 2017 RSAs, which will vest on March 2, 2020 subject to continued employment and (iii) 14,825 PSUs remaining from his grant of 2018 PSUs, which
will vest on March 2, 2021 subject to continued employment.  4
Assumes performance achievement of 100% payout of the PSUs and a closing price per share of $7.00 on
December 31, 2018 (the last trading day of the year).  24




---

##### Table of Contents

OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED The following table shows information regarding the value of options exercised and RSAs, RSUs and PSUs vested during the year ended December 31, 2018. Option Exercises and Stock Vested Table  Name
(a)

OPTION AWARDS

STOCK
AWARDSNumber of Shares    Acquired on Exercise    
(#)(b)

Value Realized    on
Exercise    ($)(c)

Number of Shares      Acquired on Vesting      
(#)(d)(1)

Value Realized      on
Vesting      ($)(e)(2)Thomas J. Quinlan III

N/A

N/A

161,927

2,167,429Suzanne S. Bettman

N/A

N/A

26,733

348,023Andrew B. Coxhead

N/A

N/A

13,877

171,892Kent A. Hansen

N/A

N/A

3,617

38,232Richard T. Lane

N/A

N/A

12,522

165,562  1
Represents the vesting of RSAs and RSUs under the LSC PIP. 2
Value realized on vesting of RSUs is the fair market value on the date of vesting, based on the closing price of
LSC common stock as reported by the NYSE, which on March 2, 2018 was $15.03. Value realized on vesting of RSAs is the fair market value on the date of vesting, based on the closing price of LSC common stock as reported by the NYSE, which on
October 1, 2018 was $10.57. PENSION BENEFITS Generally, effective December 31, 2011, RRD froze benefit accruals under all of its then existing federal income tax qualified U.S. defined benefit pension
plans (collectively referred to as the RRD Qualified Retirement Plans) that were still open to accruals. Therefore, beginning January 1, 2012, participants generally ceased earning additional benefits under the RRD Qualified
Retirement Plans. Thereafter, the RRD Qualified Retirement Plans were merged into one RRD Qualified Retirement Plan and generally no new participants entered this plan. Before the RRD Qualified Retirement Plans were frozen, accrual rates varied
based on age and service. Accruals for the plans were calculated using compensation that generally included salary and annual cash bonus awards. The amount of annual earnings that may be considered in calculating benefits under a qualified pension
plan is limited by law. Defined benefit pension plans for LSC employees (collectively referred to as the LSC Qualified Retirement Plans), which
were created to be substantially similar to those provided pre-Separation by RRD (including with respect to being frozen for future benefit accruals), were adopted in connection with the Separation. The assets
and liabilities of LSC-allocated employees and certain former employees and retirees were transferred to, and assumed by, such LSC Qualified Retirement Plans. The LSC Qualified Retirement Plans are funded
entirely by LSC with contributions made to a trust fund from which the benefits of participants are paid. The U.S. Internal Revenue Code places limitations
on pensions that can be accrued under tax qualified plans. Prior to being frozen, to the extent an employees pension would have accrued under a qualified retirement plan if it were not for such limitations, the additional benefits were accrued
under an unfunded supplemental pension plan by RRD prior to the Separation (the RRD SERP) and following the Separation by LSC in an unfunded supplemental pension plan (the LSC SERP). The assets and liabilities of the RRD SERP
related to LSC-allocated employees and certain former employees and retirees were transferred at the time of the Separation to the LSC SERP. Prior to a change of control, the LSC SERP is unfunded and provides
for payments to be made out of LSCs general assets. Generally, no additional benefits will accrue under the LSC Qualified Retirement Plans or the related LSC SERP. Some participants, including those that have a cash balance or pension equity benefit, can elect to receive either a life annuity or a lump sum amount upon
termination. Other participants will receive their plan benefit in the form of a life annuity. Under a life annuity benefit, benefits are paid monthly after retirement for the life of the participant or, if the participant is married or chooses an
optional benefit form, generally in a reduced amount for the lives of the participant and surviving spouse or other named survivor. See Note 14 to the
Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements included in the Original Form 10-K for a discussion of the relevant assumptions used in calculating the present value of the current accrued benefit under the
LSC Qualified Retirement Plan and the LSC SERP set forth in the table below. Pension Benefits Table  Name(a)

Plan Name
(b)

Number of          Years        
  Credited          Service
(#)
(c)(1)

Present Value of              Accumulated 
             Benefit
($)
(d)


Payments        During Last   
     Fiscal Year        ($) (e)Thomas J. Quinlan III

Pension Plan

11


100,870


LSC SERP

11


701,612


Suzanne S. Bettman

Pension Plan

7


115,247


LSC SERP

7


271,633


  25




---

##### Table of Contents

Name(a)

Plan Name
(b)

Number of          Years        
  Credited          Service
(#)
(c)(1)

Present Value of              Accumulated 
             Benefit
($)
(d)


Payments        During Last   
     Fiscal Year        ($) (e)Andrew B. Coxhead

Pension Plan

16


150,650


LSC SERP

16


52,767


Kent A.
Hansen(2)

Pension Plan







LSC SERP







Richard T. Lane

Pension Plan

12


280,440


LSC SERP

12


209,130


  1
The number of years of credited service was frozen effective December 31, 2011 (the date benefit accruals
were frozen by RRD). 2
RRD did not have a pension plan open to new participants when Mr. Hansen was hired by RRD, so he is not a
participant in our pension plan or supplemental pension plan and has no benefits under either plan. NONQUALIFIED DEFERRED
COMPENSATION Pursuant to RRDs Deferred Compensation Plan, participants were able to defer up to 50% of base salary and 90% of annual incentive
bonus payments. Deferred amounts were credited with earnings or losses based on the rate of return of mutual funds selected by the participant, which the participant could change at any time. RRD did not make contributions to participants
accounts under the RRD Deferred Compensation Plan in 2016. In connection with the Separation, LSC created the LSC Deferred Compensation Plan which is
substantially similar to the RRD Deferred Compensation Plan, and the assets and liabilities of LSC-allocated employees and certain former employees and retirees were transferred to, and assumed by, the LSC
Deferred Compensation Plan. Participants deferral elections continued through the end of the 2016 calendar year. LSC determined not to offer eligible employees the opportunity to make deferrals for 2017 or 2018 and will determine, in its
discretion, whether to offer eligible employees the opportunity to make deferrals in the future. LSC has not made any contributions to participants accounts under the LSC Deferred Compensation Plan. Distributions generally are paid either in a lump sum or in quarterly installments for a certain number of years, based on the participants preexisting
election and pursuant to the terms of the LSC Deferred Compensation Plan, on the latter of (1) the first day of the year following the year in which the participants employment with LSC terminates or the participant retires and
(2) the six-month anniversary of such termination or retirement, in each case unless the participant elects that a distribution be made three years after a deferral under certain circumstances.
Participants could also have elected to receive their account balance in a lump sum within 60 days after a change in control. RRDs Supplemental
Retirement Plan-B (the SERP-B) was transferred to LSC in connection with the Separation. Under the SERP-B,
participants could defer a portion of their regular earnings substantially equal to the difference between the amount that, in the absence of legislation limiting additions to the Companys savings plan, would have been allocated to a
participants account as before-tax and matching contributions, minus the deferral amount actually allocated under the Companys savings plan. Deferred amounts earn interest at the prime rate and
such interest and distributions are paid in a lump sum upon the six-month anniversary of the termination of the participants employment. The SERP-B was frozen in
2004 and no additional amounts may be contributed by the NEOs. The table below shows (i) the contributions made by each of the NEOs during the year
ended December 31, 2018, (ii) aggregate earnings on each of the NEOs account balance during the year ended December 31, 2018 and (iii) the account balance of each NEO as of December 31, 2018. The table also presents amounts
deferred under the SERP-B. Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Table  Name
(a)

Executive
Contributions
in Last FY
($) (b)

Registrant
Contributionsin Last FY ($)(c)

Aggregate
Earnings  in Last FY($) (d)(1)


Aggregate
Withdrawals/Distributions($) (e)

Aggregate
Balance at
Last FYE($) (f)Thomas J. Quinlan IIIDeferred Compensation Plan












Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan-B






14,078





295,641Suzanne S. BettmanDeferred Compensation Plan






(134,158)





1,520,655Andrew B. CoxheadDeferred Compensation Plan












Kent A. HansenDeferred Compensation Plan

N/A

N/A


N/A


N/A


N/ARichard T. LaneDeferred Compensation Plan






15,468





554,605  1
Amounts in this column with respect to the Deferred Compensation Plan are not included in the 2018 Summary
Compensation Table. Amounts in this column for Mr. Quinlan with respect to the SERP-B consist of contributed interest calculated at the prime interest rate on the NEOs account balance and are
included in the 2018 Summary Compensation Table.  26




---

##### Table of Contents

POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE IN CONTROL In 2018, each of the NEOs, other than Mr. Quinlan, agreed to enter into a participation agreement (each, a Participation Agreement) to
commence participation in the Companys Key Employee Severance Plan (the Severance Plan) and, in exchange therefore, waive their existing employment agreements with the Company. This section describes the payments that would have
been received by the NEOs upon termination of employment at December 31, 2018. References in this section to agreement(s) shall be deemed to include Mr. Quinlans employment agreement, to the extent applicable,
Ms. Bettmans former employment agreement (prior to her entry into her Participation Agreement) and to the Participation Agreement and Severance Plan for each of Ms. Bettman (to the extent applicable) and Messrs. Coxhead, Hansen and
Lane. The amount of these payments would have depended upon the circumstances of termination, which include termination by LSC without Cause, termination by the employee for Good Reason, other voluntary termination by the employee, death,
disability, or termination following a Change in Control of LSC (each as defined in the applicable agreement). The information in this section is based upon the agreements as in effect as of December 31, 2018. This information is presented to
illustrate the payments the NEOs would have received from LSC under the various termination scenarios. A description of the terms with respect to each of these types of terminations follows. TERMINATION OTHER THAN AFTER A CHANGE IN CONTROL The agreements in effect on December 31, 2018 with each NEO provided for payments of certain benefits, as described below, upon termination of employment.
The NEOs rights upon a termination of employment depend upon the circumstances of termination. Central to an understanding of the rights of each NEO under the agreements is an understanding of the definitions of Cause and
Good Reason that are used in those agreements. For purposes of the agreements:  +
LSC has Cause to terminate Mr. Quinlan if he has engaged in any of a list of specified activities,
including refusing to substantially perform duties consistent with the scope and nature of his position or refusal or failure to attempt in good faith to follow the written direction of the Board, committing an act materially injurious (monetarily
or otherwise) to LSC or LSCs subsidiaries, or commission of a felony or other actions specified in the definition. LSC has Cause to terminate an NEO (other than Mr. Quinlan) if the NEO has engaged in any of a list of specified
activities, including engaging in conduct that materially violates the policies of the Company, failing to perform the essential functions of the job or failing to carry out the Companys reasonable directions issued by the NEOs
supervisor with respect to the NEOs material duties, misappropriation of corporate funds or other acts of fraud, dishonesty or self-dealing or commission of a felony or other actions specified in the definition.  +
The NEOs are said to have Good Reason to terminate employment (and thereby gain access to the benefits
described below) if LSC assigns the NEO duties that represent a material diminution of his or her duties or responsibilities, reduces the NEOs compensation, generally requires that the NEOs principal office be located other than in or
around Chicago, Illinois (for Ms. Bettman and Messrs. Coxhead and Hansen), Norwalk, Connecticut (for Mr. Lane) or New York, New York (for Mr. Quinlan), or materially breaches the agreement. TERMINATION AFTER A CHANGE IN CONTROL In
response to stockholder feedback, the legacy Section 280G excise tax gross-ups contained in Mr. Quinlan and Ms. Bettmans agreements were removed, and therefore, none of the NEOs are
entitled to tax gross-ups upon a termination after a Change in Control of LSC. As with the severance provisions
described above, the rights to which the NEOs are entitled under the Change in Control provisions upon a termination of employment are dependent on the circumstances of the termination. The definitions of Cause and Good Reason are the same in this
termination scenario as in a termination other than after a Change in Control. POTENTIAL PAYMENT OBLIGATIONS UNDER AGREEMENTS UPON
TERMINATION OR CHANGE IN CONTROL The following tables set forth LSCs payment obligations under the agreements under the circumstances
specified upon a termination of the employment of the NEOs or upon a Change in Control, assuming such termination occurred on December 31, 2018. The tables do not include payments or benefits that do not discriminate in scope, terms or
operation in favor of the NEOs and are generally available to all salaried employees, or pension or deferred compensation payments that are discussed in Pension Benefits and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation above. Mr. Quinlans employment agreement provides that if he is terminated without Cause or for Good Reason not in connection with a Change in Control, he
will be entitled to receive:  +
an amount equal to two times of the sum of Mr. Quinlans base salary and target annual bonus, paid in
equal installments over the 24-month period following his termination, subject to the execution of a customary release; and  +
continuation of all benefits (including Mr. Quinlans car allowance) to which Mr. Quinlan was
eligible to receive prior to his termination until and including the last day of the second calendar year following the calendar year in which the qualifying termination occurs. In general, the other NEOs agreements provide that, in the event an NEO experiences a termination without Cause or resigns for Good Reason (each of which
we refer to as a qualifying termination), in each case not in connection with a Change in Control, the NEO will be entitled to receive the following benefits, subject to the execution of a release and agreement to certain restrictive
covenants, including non-competition, non-solicitation and confidentiality covenants:  +
salary continuation for 18 months (12 months for Mr. Hansen);  +
equal payments made in accordance with the Companys regular payroll dates that, in the aggregate, equal
150% (100% for Mr. Hansen) of the NEOs target annual bonus over a period of 24 months (18 months for Mr. Hansen);  27




---

##### Table of Contents

+
a lump-sum payment representing the difference between the NEOs
monthly medical insurance cost immediately prior to his or her qualifying termination and the monthly cost for COBRA for 18 months (12 months for Mr. Hansen); and  +
six months of outplacement assistance from a provider selected by the Company. Mr. Quinlans employment agreement provides that if he is terminated without Cause or for Good Reason within two years of a Change in Control, he
will be entitled to receive:  +
an amount equal to three times of the sum of Mr. Quinlans base salary and target annual bonus,
payable in a cash lump sum, subject to the execution of a customary release;  +
a pro rata bonus for the year of the qualifying termination, payable when bonuses are paid to LSCs senior
executives;  +
continuation of all benefits (including Mr. Quinlans car allowance) to which Mr. Quinlan was
eligible to receive prior to his termination until and including the last day of the second calendar year following the calendar year in which the qualifying termination occurs; and  +
a lump sum payment of $75,000, payable six months and one day after Mr. Quinlans qualifying
termination. In general, the other NEOs agreements provide that, in the event an NEO experiences a qualifying termination within
two years following a Change in Control, the NEO will be entitled to receive the following benefits, subject to the execution of a release and agreement to certain restrictive covenants, including non-competition, non-solicitation and confidentiality covenants:  +
salary continuation for 24 months (18 months for Mr. Hansen);  +
equal payments made in accordance with the Companys regular payroll dates that, in the aggregate, equal
200% (150% for Mr. Hansen) of the NEOs target annual bonus over a period of 24 months (18 months for Mr. Hansen);  +
a lump-sum payment representing the difference between the NEOs
monthly medical insurance cost immediately prior to his or her qualifying termination and the monthly cost for COBRA for 24 months (18 months for Mr. Hansen); and  +
six months of outplacement assistance from a provider selected by the Company. Disability or Death All NEOs (other than
Mr. Hansen, who was hired by RRD when RRD did not have a pension plan open to new participants) are entitled to pension benefits upon death or disability according to the terms of the LSC Qualified Retirement Plans. Each NEO is entitled to
benefits paid under a supplemental disability insurance policy and a supplemental life insurance policy maintained by LSC for the NEOs benefit. Pursuant to the terms of the AIP, each NEO may be entitled to his or her annual bonus for the year
in which the disability or death occurs, payable at the same time as and to the extent that all other annual bonuses are paid and as available to all employees who participate in the plan, determined in the HR Committees discretion.
Additionally, all unvested equity awards held by each NEO, except the performance unit awards granted in 2018, will immediately vest upon disability or death pursuant to the terms of their applicable award agreements. With respect to the performance
unit awards granted in 2018, 50% of all such unvested awards (based on the greater of the target and actual performance level) held by each NEO will immediately vest upon disability or death, pursuant to the terms of the applicable award agreement. Equity Acceleration Pursuant to the
terms of their applicable agreements, Mr. Quinlan and Ms. Bettman are entitled to immediate vesting of all outstanding time-based equity awards in the event of any termination initiated by the NEO for Good Reason or termination initiated
by LSC without Cause (whether or not in connection with a Change in Control). All of Mr. Quinlans and Ms. Bettmans performance-based equity awards will be treated in accordance with the applicable award agreement. Our NEOs are
generally entitled to immediate vesting of all outstanding equity awards granted to them in 2016 and 2017 upon a Change in Control (as defined in the applicable performance incentive plan) under the terms of the 2016 Performance Incentive Plan,
prior to the amendments to the plan that were approved at our 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. The terms of the outstanding equity awards granted to our NEOs in 2018 require both a Change in Control and qualifying termination within two years
following such Change in Control for such awards to vest. For all NEOs, all unvested equity awards are forfeited in the event of a resignation other than for Good Reason or termination with Cause. Note, however, that the completion of the Merger will impact the compensation that we awarded to our NEOs in 2018 and prior years. More information on how the
Merger will impact outstanding long-term incentive awards is described in Compensation Discussion& Analysis - Treatment of Equity Awards in the Merger Agreement above and the section entitled The
MergerInterests of LSCs Executive Officers and Directors in the Merger set forth in the joint proxy statement/prospectus filed by Quad/Graphics, Inc. with the SEC on January 15, 2019. Note that if the Merger is not
consummated, the equity awards will remain outstanding and subject to vesting pursuant to their original terms. Health Care Benefits Mr. Quinlans employment agreement generally provides that, after resignation for Good Reason or termination without Cause, LSC will
continue providing the medical, dental, and vision coverage to him that he was eligible to receive immediately prior to such termination for a 24-month period following the date of termination.
Ms. Bettman and Messrs. Coxhead and Lanes agreements provide that, after resignation for Good Reason or termination without Cause, they are each entitled to receive a lump-sum payment representing
the difference between his or her monthly medical  28




---

##### Table of Contents

insurance cost immediately prior to his or her resignation or termination and the monthly cost for COBRA for 18 months, if prior to a Change in Control, or for 24 months if within two years
following a Change in Control. Mr. Hansens agreement provides that, after resignation for Good Reason or termination without Cause, he is entitled to receive a lump-sum payment representing the
difference between his monthly medical insurance cost immediately prior to his resignation or termination and the monthly cost for COBRA for 12 months, if prior to a Change in Control, or for 18 months if within two years following a Change in
Control. Note, however, that Ms. Bettman and Mr. Hansen do not receive medical benefits through LSC and thus would not receive the aforementioned lump-sum payment. Benefits payable upon disability or
death are described in Disability or Death above. The following tables assume that termination or any Change in Control took place on
December 31, 2018. Mr. Quinlan, the Companys Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President, would be entitled to the following:  Resignation for
Good Reason or
Termination
Without
Cause($)


Resignation for
other than
for Good
Reason or
Termination
With Cause($)

Resignation for
Good Reason or
Termination
Without Cause
after Change in Control($)


Change inControl($)


Disability($)


Death($)Cash Severance:Base Salary


2,400,000 (1)


0


3,600,000(2)



0



(3)



Bonus


3,600,000(1)


0


5,475,000(2)



0



(4)



(4)Equity:(5)Restricted Stock Units


2,567,642(6)


0


2,567,642(7)



1,763,132(7)



2,567,642(8)



2,567,642(8)Restricted Stock


0


0


418,019(7)



418,019(7)



418,019(8)



418,019(8)Performance Share Units


0


0


804,510(9)



0(9)



402,255(10)



402,255(10)Benefits and Perquisites:(11)Post-Termination Health Care


22,236


0


22,236



0







Supplemental Life Insurance


4,580


0


4,580



0







2,000,000(12)Supplemental Disability Insurance


9,080


0


9,080



0



1,646,489(13)



Financial Planning


24,000


0


24,000



0







Car Allowance


33,600


0


33,600



0







Total:


8,661,138


0


12,958,667



2,181,151



5,034,405



5,387,916  1
Mr. Quinlan is entitled to 2.0x base salary and 2.0x target annual bonus as if all targets and objectives
had been met, paid over the applicable severance period. Mr. Quinlan would have been entitled to his annual bonus on December 31 pursuant to the terms of the plan under which the annual bonus is paid (which provides for payment of the
bonus to any participant who is on the payroll as of December 31, the same terms generally available to all salaried employees who participate in the plan), which is not reflected in this table.  2
Mr. Quinlan is entitled to 3.0x base salary and 3.0x annual bonus as if all targets and objectives had been
met, paid over the applicable severance period, which are reflected in this table. Pursuant to the terms of his employment agreement, Mr. Quinlan is also entitled to his pro-rated annual bonus for the
year in which the termination after a Change in Control occurs, payable at the same time as and to the extent that all other annual bonuses are paid. This bonus is not reflected in this table as, assuming a termination date of December 31,
2018, Mr. Quinlan would have been entitled to this bonus pursuant to the terms of the plan under which the annual bonus is paid (which provides for payment of the bonus to any participant who is on the payroll as of December 31) which are the
same terms generally available to all salaried employees who participate in the plan. Also included as bonus is a $75,000 lump sum payment to which Mr. Quinlan is entitled pursuant to the terms of his employment agreement.  3
Mr. Quinlan is entitled to the same 60% of base salary until age 65 with a maximum $10,000 per month that
is generally available to all salaried employees upon disability.  4
Mr. Quinlan may be entitled to his annual bonus for the year in which the disability or death occurs,
payable at the same time as and to the extent that all other annual bonuses are paid, which are the same terms generally available to all salaried employees who participate in the AIP, and determined in the HR Committees discretion.  5
Assumes the closing price per share of LSC of $7.00 on December 31, 2018 (the last trading day of the
year).  6
All unvested time-based equity awards held by Mr. Quinlan will vest immediately upon his resignation for
Good Reason or termination without Cause pursuant to the terms of his employment agreement.  7
All unvested time-based equity awards granted to Mr. Quinlan prior to 2018 will vest immediately upon a
Change in Control (as defined in the LSC PIP) under the terms of the LSC PIP. All unvested time-based equity awards granted to Mr. Quinlan in 2018 will remain outstanding upon a Change in Control (as defined in the LSC PIP).  8
All unvested time-based equity awards held by Mr. Quinlan will immediately vest upon disability or death
pursuant to the terms of the applicable award agreements.  9
Per the terms of the 2018 PSU award agreement, upon the date of a Change in Control, the PSUs will be deemed met
at the greater of target and actual performance at such date in connection with such event, but will remain subject to time-based vesting for the remainder of the performance period. All PSUs granted to Mr. Quinlan will vest upon his
resignation for Good Reason or termination without Cause after a Change in Control, based on the performance level as determined in the prior sentence.  10
With respect to the performance unit awards granted in 2018, 50% of all such unvested awards (based on the
greater of the target and actual performance level) will immediately vest upon disability or death. The table assumes such event occurred on December 31, 2018 and vesting and payment of the PSUs at the target performance level.  11
Except as disclosed, Mr. Quinlan receives the same benefits that are generally available to all salaried
employees upon disability or death.  12
Represents benefits payable under a supplemental life insurance policy maintained by LSC for the benefit of
Mr. Quinlan in excess of the amount generally available to all salaried employees.  13
Represents benefits payable under a supplemental disability insurance policy maintained by LSC for the benefit
of Mr. Quinlan in excess of the amount generally available to all salaried employees.  29




---

##### Table of Contents

Ms. Bettman, LSCs Chief Administrative Officer and General Counsel, would be entitled to the
following:  Resignation for
Good Reason or
Termination
Without
Cause($)


Resignation for
other than
for Good
Reason or
Termination
With Cause($)

Resignation for
Good Reason or
Termination
Without Cause
after Change
in Control($)


Change in
Control($)


Disability($)


Death($)Cash Severance:Base Salary


810,000(1)


0


1,080,000(2)



0



(3)



Bonus


1,215,000(1)


0


1,620,000(2)



0



(4)



(4)Equity:(5)Restricted Stock Units


490,812(6)


0


490,812(7)



335,132(7)



490,812(8)



490,812(8)Restricted Stock


191,009(6)


0


191,009(7)



191,009(7)



191,009(8)



191,009(8)Performance Share Units


0


0


155,680(9)



0(9)



77,840(10)



77,840(10)Benefits and 
Perquisites:(11)Supplemental Life Insurance


0


0


0



0







2,000,000(12)Supplemental Disability Insurance


0


0


0



0



1,886,500(13)



Outplacement Services


30,000(14)





30,000(14)Total:


2,736,821


0


3,567,501



526,141



2,646,161



2,759,661  1
Ms. Bettman is entitled to 1.5x base salary and 1.5x target annual bonus as if all targets and objectives
had been met, paid over the applicable severance period. Ms. Bettman would have been entitled to her annual bonus on December 31 pursuant to the terms of the plan under which the annual bonus is paid (which provides for payment of the
bonus to any participant who is on the payroll as of December 31, the same terms generally available to all salaried employees who participate in the plan), which is not reflected in this table.  2
Ms. Bettman is entitled to 2.0x base salary and 2.0x target annual bonus as if all targets and objectives
had been met, paid over the applicable severance period. Ms. Bettman would have been entitled to her annual bonus on December 31 pursuant to the terms of the plan under which the annual bonus is paid (which provides for payment of the
bonus to any participant who is on the payroll as of December 31, the same terms generally available to all salaried employees who participate in the plan), which is not reflected in this table.  3
Ms. Bettman is entitled to the same 60% of base salary until age 65 with a maximum $10,000 per month that
is generally available to all salaried employees upon disability.  4
Ms. Bettman may be entitled to her annual bonus for the year in which the disability or death occurs,
payable at the same time as and to the extent that all other annual bonuses are paid, which are the same terms generally available to all salaried employees who participate in the AIP, and determined in the HR Committees discretion.  5
Assumes the closing price per share of LSC of $7.00 on December 31, 2018 (the last trading day of the
year).  6
All unvested time-based equity awards and unvested performance-based equity awards granted to Ms. Bettman
prior to October 25, 2017 will vest immediately upon her resignation for Good Reason or termination without Cause pursuant to the terms of her agreement.  7
All unvested time-based equity awards granted to Ms. Bettman after October 25, 2017 but prior to 2018
will vest immediately upon a Change in Control (as defined in the LSC PIP). All unvested time-based equity awards granted to Ms. Bettman in 2018 will remain outstanding upon a Change in Control (as defined in the LSC PIP).  8
All unvested time-based equity awards held by Ms. Bettman will immediately vest upon disability or death
pursuant to the terms of the applicable award agreements.  9
Per the terms of the 2018 PSU award agreement, upon the date of a Change in Control, the PSUs will be deemed met
at the greater of target and actual performance at such date in connection with such event, but will remain subject to time-based vesting for the remainder of the performance period. All PSUs granted to Ms. Bettman will vest upon her
resignation for Good Reason or termination without Cause after a Change in Control, based on the performance level as determined in the prior sentence.  10
With respect to the performance unit awards granted in 2018, 50% of all such unvested awards (based on the
greater of the target and actual performance level) will immediately vest upon disability or death. The table assumes such event occurred on December 31, 2018 and vesting and payment of the PSUs at the target performance level.  11
Except as disclosed, Ms. Bettman receives the same benefits that are generally available to all salaried
employees upon death or disability.  12
Represents benefits payable under a supplemental life insurance policy maintained by LSC for the benefit of
Ms. Bettman in excess of the amount generally available to all salaried employees.  13
Represents benefits payable under a supplemental disability insurance policy maintained by LSC for the benefit
of Ms. Bettman in excess of the amount generally available to all salaried employees.  14
Represents the approximate cost of six months of outplacement assistance from a provider to be selected by LSC.  30




---

##### Table of Contents

Mr. Coxhead, LSCs Chief Financial Officer, would be entitled to the following:  Resignation for
Good Reason or
Termination
Without
Cause($)


Resignation for
other than
for Good
Reason or
Termination
With Cause($)

Resignation for
Good Reason or
Termination
Without Cause
after Change in Control($)


Change inControl($)


Disability($)


Death($)Cash Severance:Base Salary


810,000(1)


0


1,080,000(2)



0



(3)



Bonus


810,000(1)


0


1,080,000(2)



0



(4)



(4)Equity:(5)Restricted Stock Units


0


0


391,111(6)



202,986(6)



391,111(7)



391,111(7)Restricted Stock


0


0


184,555(6)



184,555(6)



184,555(7)



184,555(7)Performance Share Units


0


0


188,125(8)



0(8)



94,063(9)



94,063(9)Benefits and Perquisites:(10)Medical Payment


12,431(11)


0


16,575(12)



0







Supplemental Life Insurance


0


0


0



0







2,000,000(13)Supplemental Disability Insurance


0


0


0



0



3,960,000(14)



Outplacement Services


30,000(15)





30,000(15)Total:


1,662,431


0


2,970,366



387,541



4,629,729



2,669,729  1
Mr. Coxhead is entitled to 1.5x base salary and 1.5x target annual bonus as if all targets and objectives
had been met, paid over the applicable severance period. Mr. Coxhead would have been entitled to his annual bonus on December 31 pursuant to the terms of the plan under which the annual bonus is paid (which provides for payment of the
bonus to any participant who is on the payroll as of December 31, the same terms generally available to all salaried employees who participate in the plan), which is not reflected in this table.  2
Mr. Coxhead is entitled to 2.0x base salary and 2.0x target annual bonus as if all targets and objectives
had been met, paid over the applicable severance period. Mr. Coxhead would have been entitled to her annual bonus on December 31 pursuant to the terms of the plan under which the annual bonus is paid (which provides for payment of the
bonus to any participant who is on the payroll as of December 31, the same terms generally available to all salaried employees who participate in the plan), which is not reflected in this table.  3
Mr. Coxhead is entitled to the same 60% of base salary until age 65 with a maximum $10,000 per month that
is generally available to all salaried employees upon disability.  4
Mr. Coxhead may be entitled to his annual bonus for the year in which the disability or death occurs,
payable at the same time as and to the extent that all other annual bonuses are paid, which are the same terms generally available to all salaried employees who participate in the AIP, and determined in the HR Committees discretion.  5
Assumes the closing price per share of LSC of $7.00 on December 31, 2018 (the last trading day of the
year).  6
All unvested time-based equity awards granted to Mr. Coxhead prior to 2018 will vest immediately upon a
Change in Control (as defined in the LSC PIP) under the terms of the LSC PIP. All unvested time-based equity awards granted to Mr. Coxhead in 2018 will remain outstanding upon a Change in Control (as defined in the LSC PIP).  7
All unvested time-based equity awards held by Mr. Coxhead will immediately vest upon disability or death
pursuant to the terms of the applicable award agreements.  8
Per the terms of the 2018 PSU award agreement, upon the date of a Change in Control, the PSUs will be deemed met
at the greater of target and actual performance at such date in connection with such event, but will remain subject to time-based vesting for the remainder of the performance period. All PSUs granted to Mr. Coxhead will vest upon his
resignation for Good Reason or termination without Cause after a Change in Control, based on the performance level as determined in the prior sentence.  9
With respect to the performance unit awards granted in 2018, 50% of all such unvested awards (based on the
greater of the target and actual performance level) will immediately vest upon disability or death. The table assumes such event occurred on December 31, 2018 and vesting and payment of the PSUs at the target performance level.  10
Except as disclosed, Mr. Coxhead receives the same benefits that are generally available to all salaried
employees upon death or disability.  11
Represents lump sum payment for 18 months of medical premiums equal to the difference in the COBRA rate and the
regular employee rate.  12
Represents lump sum payment for 24 months of medical premiums equal to the difference in the COBRA rate and the
regular employee rate.  13
Represents benefits payable under a supplemental life insurance policy maintained by LSC for the benefit of
Mr. Coxhead in excess of the amount generally available to all salaried employees.  14
Represents benefits payable under a supplemental disability insurance policy maintained by LSC for the benefit
of Mr. Coxhead in excess of the amount generally available to all salaried employees.  15
Represents the approximate cost of six months of outplacement assistance from a provider to be selected by LSC.  31




---

##### Table of Contents

Mr. Hansen, LSCs Chief Accounting Officer and Controller, would be entitled to the following:  Resignation forGood Reason orTerminationWithout Cause($)


Resignationfor   other thanfor
GoodReasonTermination  With Cause($)

Resignation forGood Reasonor TerminationWithout Causeafter Changein Control($)


Change inControl($)


Disability($)


Death($)Cash Severance:Base Salary


325,000
(1)

0


487,500
(2)


0




(2)


Bonus


243,750
(1)

0


365,625
(2)


0




(4)



(4)Equity:(5)Restricted Stock Units


0


0


57,050
(6)


18,130
(6)


57,050
(7)


57,050
(7)Restricted Stock


0


0


47,026
(6)


47,026
(6)


47,026
(7)


47,026
(7)Performance Share Units


0


0


38,920
(8)


0
(8)


19,460
(9)


19,460
(9)Benefits and Perquisites:(10)Supplemental Life Insurance


0


0


0



0







2,000,000
(11)Supplemental Disability Insurance


0


0


0



0



4,616,667
(12)


Outplacement Services


30,000
(13)




30,000
(13)Total:


598,750


0


1,026,121



65,156



4,740,203



2,123,536  1
Mr. Hansen is entitled to 1.0x base salary and 1.0x target annual bonus as if all targets and objectives
had been met, paid over the applicable severance period. Mr. Hansen would have been entitled to his annual bonus on December 31 pursuant to the terms of the plan under which the annual bonus is paid (which provides for payment of the bonus
to any participant who is on the payroll as of December 31, the same terms generally available to all salaried employees who participate in the plan), which is not reflected in this table.  2
Mr. Hansen is entitled to 1.5x base salary and 1.5x target annual bonus as if all targets and objectives
had been met, paid over the applicable severance period. Mr. Hansen would have been entitled to his annual bonus on December 31 pursuant to the terms of the plan under which the annual bonus is paid (which provides for payment of the bonus
to any participant who is on the payroll as of December 31, the same terms generally available to all salaried employees who participate in the plan), which is not reflected in this table.  3
Mr. Hansen is entitled to the same 60% of base salary until age 65 with a maximum $10,000 per month that is
generally available to all salaried employees upon disability.  4
Mr. Hansen may be entitled to his annual bonus for the year in which the disability or death occurs,
payable at the same time as and to the extent that all other annual bonuses are paid, which are the same terms generally available to all salaried employees who participate in the AIP, and determined in the HR Committees discretion.  5
Assumes the closing price per share of LSC of $7.00 on December 31, 2018 (the last trading day of the
year).  6
All unvested time-based equity awards granted to Mr. Hansen prior to 2018 will vest immediately upon a
Change in Control (as defined in the LSC PIP) under the terms of the LSC PIP. All unvested time-based equity awards granted to Mr. Hansen in 2018 will remain outstanding upon a Change in Control (as defined in the LSC PIP).  7
All unvested time-based equity awards held by Mr. Hansen will immediately vest upon disability or death
pursuant to the terms of the applicable award agreements.  8
Per the terms of the 2018 PSU award agreement, upon the date of a Change in Control, the PSUs will be deemed met
at the greater of target and actual performance at such date in connection with such event, but will remain subject to time-based vesting for the remainder of the performance period. All PSUs granted to Mr. Hansen will vest upon his resignation
for Good Reason or termination without Cause after a Change in Control, based on the performance level as determined in the prior sentence.  9
With respect to the performance unit awards granted in 2018, 50% of all such unvested awards (based on the
greater of the target and actual performance level) will immediately vest upon disability or death. The table assumes such event occurred on December 31, 2018 and vesting and payment of the PSUs at the target performance level.  10
Except as disclosed, Mr. Hansen receives the same benefits that are generally available to all salaried
employees upon death or disability.  11
Represents benefits payable under a supplemental life insurance policy maintained by LSC for the benefit of
Mr. Hansen in excess of the amount generally available to all salaried employees.  12
Represents benefits payable under a supplemental disability insurance policy maintained by LSC for the benefit
of Mr. Hansen in excess of the amount generally available to all salaried employees.  13
Represents the approximate cost of six months of outplacement assistance from a provider to be selected by LSC.  32




---

##### Table of Contents

Mr. Lane, LSCs Chief Strategy and Supply Chain Officer, would be entitled to the following:  Resignation forGood Reason orTerminationWithout Cause($)


Resignationfor
other thanfor GoodReason
orTerminationWith Cause($)


Resignation forGood Reason orTerminationWithout Causeafter Change
in Control($)


Change inControl($)


Disability($)


Death($)Cash Severance:Base Salary


675,000
(1)


0



900,000(2)



0




(3)


Bonus


675,000
(1)


0



900,000(2)



0




(4)



(4)Equity:(5)Restricted Stock Units


0



0



229,943(6)



126,168
(6)


229,943
(7)


229,943
(7)Restricted Stock


0



0



93,569(6)



93,569
(6)


93,569
(7)


93,569
(7)Performance Share Units


0



0



103,775(8)



0
(9)


51,888
(9)


51,888
(9)Benefits and Perquisites:(10)Medical Payment


6,849
(11)






9,132(12)



0







Supplemental Life Insurance


0



0



0



0







2,000,000
(13)Supplemental Disability Insurance


0



0



0



0



1,167,333
(14)


Outplacement Services


30,000
(15)






30,000(15)Total:


1,386,849



0



2,266,419



219,737



1,542,733



2,375,400  1
Mr. Lane is entitled to 1.5x base salary and 1.5x target annual bonus as if all targets and objectives had
been met, paid over the applicable severance period. Mr. Lane would have been entitled to his annual bonus on December 31 pursuant to the terms of the plan under which the annual bonus is paid (which provides for payment of the bonus to
any participant who is on the payroll as of December 31, the same terms generally available to all salaried employees who participate in the plan), which is not reflected in this table.  2
Mr. Lane is entitled to 2.0x base salary and 2.0x target annual bonus as if all targets and objectives had
been met, paid over the applicable severance period. Mr. Lane would have been entitled to his annual bonus on December 31 pursuant to the terms of the plan under which the annual bonus is paid (which provides for payment of the bonus to
any participant who is on the payroll as of December 31, the same terms generally available to all salaried employees who participate in the plan), which is not reflected in this table.  3
Mr. Lane is entitled to the same 60% of base salary until age 65 with a maximum $10,000 per month that is
generally available to all salaried employees upon disability.  4
Mr. Lane may be entitled to his annual bonus for the year in which the disability or death occurs, payable
at the same time as and to the extent that all other annual bonuses are paid, which are the same terms generally available to all salaried employees who participate in the AIP, and determined in the HR Committees discretion.  5
Assumes the closing price per share of LSC of $7.00 on December 31, 2018 (the last trading day of the
year).  6
All unvested time-based equity awards granted to Mr. Lane prior to 2018 will vest immediately upon a Change
in Control (as defined in the LSC PIP) under the terms of the LSC PIP. All unvested time-based equity awards granted to Mr. Lane in 2018 will remain outstanding upon a Change in Control (as defined in the LSC PIP).  7
All unvested time-based LSC equity awards held by Mr. Lane will immediately vest upon disability or death
pursuant to the terms of the applicable award agreements.  8
Per the terms of the 2018 PSU award agreement, upon the date of a Change in Control, the PSUs will be deemed met
at the greater of target and actual performance at such date in connection with such event, but will remain subject to time-based vesting for the remainder of the performance period. All PSUs granted to Mr. Lane will vest upon his resignation
for Good Reason or termination without Cause after a Change in Control, based on the performance level as determined in the prior sentence.  9
With respect to the performance unit awards granted in 2018, 50% of all such unvested awards (based on the
greater of the target and actual performance level) will immediately vest upon disability or death. The table assumes such event occurred on December 31, 2018 and vesting and payment of the PSUs at the target performance level.  10
Except as disclosed, Mr. Lane receives the same benefits that are generally available to all salaried
employees upon death or disability.  11
Represents lump sum payment for 18 months of medical premiums equal to the difference in the COBRA rate and the
regular employee rate.  12
Represents lump sum payment for 24 months of medical premiums equal to the difference in the COBRA rate and the
regular employee rate.  13
Represents benefits payable under a supplemental life insurance policy maintained by LSC for the benefit of
Mr. Lane in excess of the amount generally available to all salaried employees.  14
Represents benefits payable under a supplemental disability insurance policy maintained by LSC for the benefit
of Mr. Lane in excess of the amount generally available to all salaried employees.  15
Represents the approximate cost of six months of outplacement assistance from a provider to be selected by LSC.  33




---

##### Table of Contents

2018 CEO PAY RATIO Under SEC rules, we are required to calculate and disclose the annual total compensation of our median employee and the ratio of the annual total compensation
of our Chief Executive Officer to the annual total compensation of our median employee. Set forth below is the annual total compensation of our median employee, the annual total compensation of Mr. Quinlan and the ratio of those two values:  +
The 2018 annual total compensation of the employee identified as the median employee of LSC (other than our
Chief Executive Officer) was $36,127;  +
The 2018 annual total compensation of our Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Quinlan, was $4,337,670; and  +
For 2018, the estimated ratio of the annual total compensation of Mr. Quinlan to the median annual total
compensation of all of our employees was approximately 120:1. As is permitted under SEC rules, to determine our median employee, we used
our employee population as of October 31, 2018. On that determination date, we had approximately 21,992 employees globally, 175 of whom were employed in Canada and excluded pursuant to the 5% de minimis exemption permitted under SEC rules. For
this remaining population of 21,817 full-time and part-time employees worldwide, we measured compensation using W-2 compensation components (determined for the period from January 1, 2018 through
October 31, 2018), or the international equivalent, and converted the amounts reported for international employees to U.S. dollars using the exchange rate reported on October 31, 2018. We then identified our median employee and calculated
the 2018 annual total compensation for both our median employee and Mr. Quinlan using the same methodology that we used to determine our NEOs annual total compensation as reported in the 2018 Summary Compensation Table. The estimated ratio of our Chief Executive Officers 2018 annual total compensation to our median employees 2018 annual total compensation is 120:1.
This ratio is calculated using a methodology consistent with the applicable SEC rules, as described above. This ratio is notably different from that of the prior year (38:1) because Mr. Quinlan did not receive an annual long-term equity
incentive award in 2017 in consideration of his 2016 Founders Award, while his 2018 annual total compensation does include an annual long-term equity incentive award granted to him in 2018. Mr. Quinlans 2018 equity award is included
as compensation to him in the 2018 Summary Compensation Table pursuant to SEC rules, but such award will only be paid to him in future years if the applicable vesting conditions are met. As SEC rules allow for companies to adopt a wide range of methodologies, to apply country exclusions and to make reasonable estimates and assumptions that
reflect their compensation practices to identify the median employee and calculate the pay ratio, the pay ratios reported by other companies may not be comparable to the pay ratio reported above. DIRECTOR COMPENSATION LSCs
Non-Employee Director Compensation Plan provides that annual compensation for non-employee directors consists of a cash retainer and an equity retainer. The Corporate
Responsibility & Governance Committee periodically reviews directors compensation and recommends changes as appropriate. Annual director compensation is paid as of the date of the annual meeting of stockholders, however, if any
director joins the LSC Board on a date other than the date of the annual meeting, a pro-rata portion of each of the applicable cash retainer and equity retainer from the date joined to the next annual meeting
date will be granted. RSU awards granted to directors who were on the board of directors of RR Donnelley who became directors of LSC were adjusted and converted to RSUs of LSC. Such RSUs are subject to the same terms and conditions (including with
respect to vesting and deferral elections) as applicable to the corresponding RRD award immediately prior to the Separation. LSCs directors are
subject to stock ownership guidelines. CASH RETAINER The annual base cash retainer is $90,000, and a director may also receive, as applicable, the following additional cash retainer amounts:  Lead Director

$
62,500Chairman of the Audit Committee

$
25,000Chairman of the Human Resources Committee

$
25,000Chairman of the Corporate Responsibility & Governance Committee

$
20,000 EQUITY RETAINER The annual equity retainer is paid in the form of a grant of RSUs with a fair market value of $135,000. Our Lead Director receives an additional equity retainer
with a fair market value of $62,500. Fair market value is defined as the closing price of LSCs common stock on the date of grant. Under the terms of the grant agreements, each RSU will vest and be payable in full in the form of common stock on
the first anniversary of the grant date with the opportunity to defer vesting of any award until termination of service on the Board. The RSUs will also vest and be payable in full on the earlier of the date a director ceases to be a director and a
Change in Control (as defined in the LSC PIP). Dividend equivalents on the RSUs will be deferred and credited with interest quarterly (at the same rate as five-year U.S. government bonds) and paid out in cash at the same time the corresponding
portion of the RSU award vests.  34




---

##### Table of Contents

2018 NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION TABLE Directors who are our employees receive no additional fees for service as a director. Non-employee
directors receive compensation as described above.  Name

Fees Earned  or Paid in  Cash
($)


Stock  Awards  
($)(1)


All OtherCompensation    ($)(2)

Total
($)M. Shân Atkins


90,000



135,000


59


225,059Margaret A. Breya


90,000



135,000


59


225,059Judith H. Hamilton


172,500



197,500


15,846(3)


385,846Francis J. Jules


115,000



135,000


59


250,059Thomas F. OToole


90,000



135,000


59


225,059Richard K. Palmer


115,000



135,000


3,102


253,102Douglas W. Stotlar


90,000



135,000


59


225,059Shivan S. Subramaniam


90,000



135,000


59


225,059  1
The amounts shown in this column constitute RSUs granted under the LSC PIP awarded as payment of non-employee director equity retainer as set forth above under Director Compensation  Equity Retainer. Grant date fair value with respect to the RSUs is determined in accordance with ASC Topic 718. See
Note 17 to the Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements included in the Original Form 10-K for a discussion of the relevant assumptions used in calculating the fair value pursuant to ASC Topic
718. As of December 31, 2018, each director had outstanding the following aggregate number of RSUs: Ms. Atkins, 10,895; Ms. Breya, 10,895; Ms. Hamilton, 29,014; Mr. Jules, 10,895; Mr. OToole, 10,895;
Mr. Palmer, 34,869; Mr. Stotlar, 10,895; and Mr. Subramaniam, 10,895. The number of RSUs Ms. Hamilton and Mr. Palmer hold include those that carried over from their service on the Board of RRD prior to the Separation.  2
Includes interest accrued on dividend equivalents on RSUs credited to each directors account.  3
Includes $7,186 of dividends on phantom shares under the Policy on Retirement Benefits, Phantom Stock Grants and
Stock Options for Directors, credited as additional phantom shares. As of December 31, 2018, Ms. Hamilton had outstanding 7,186 phantom shares, with an additional 631 phantom shares credited from accrued dividends, all of which are fully
vested.  ITEM 12.  SECURITY
OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION Information as of December 31, 2018 concerning compensation plans under which LSC Communications equity securities are authorized for issuance is as
follows:  Number of Securitiesto Be Issued uponExercise ofOutstanding Options,Warrants and Rights
 (1)


Weighted-AverageExercise Price ofOutstanding Options,Warrants and Rights (b) 
(2)


Number of SecuritiesRemaining Available forFuture Issuance underEquity CompensationPlans(Excluding
SecuritiesReflected in Column (1)) 
(3)Plan
CategoryEquity compensation plan
approved by security holders


1,740,475
(a)

$
24.47


1,064,640 (c)  (a)
Includes 1,463,200 shares issuable upon the vesting of RSUs.  (b)
RSUs were excluded when determining the weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and
rights.  (c)
The LSC PIP allows grants in the form of cash or bonus awards, stock options, stock appreciation rights,
restricted stock, stock units or combinations thereof. The maximum number of shares of common stock that may be granted with respect to bonus awards, including performance awards or fixed awards in the form of restricted stock or other form, is
3,500,000 in the aggregate, of which 1,064,640 remain available for issuance. BENEFICIAL STOCK OWNERSHIP OF DIRECTORS,
EXECUTIVES AND LARGE STOCKHOLDERS The table below lists the beneficial ownership of common stock as of April 2, 2019 by all current directors,
each of the persons named in the tables under Executive Compensation, and the directors and executive officers as a group. The table includes all stock awards subject to vesting conditions that vest within 60 days of April 2, 2019. The
table also lists all institutions and individuals known to hold more than 5% of the Companys common stock, which has been obtained from filings made pursuant to Sections 13(d) and (g) of the Exchange Act. Except as otherwise indicated
below, each of the entities or persons named in the table has sole voting and investment power with respect to all common stock beneficially owned set forth  35




---

##### Table of Contents

opposite their name. The percentages shown are based on outstanding shares of common stock as of April 2, 2019. Unless otherwise indicated, the business address of each stockholder listed
below is LSC Communications, 191 N. Wacker Drive, Suite 1400, Chicago, IL 60606.  Name

Number

% of TotalOutstandingThomas J. Quinlan III(1)

589,567

1.76%Suzanne S. Bettman(2)

101,909

*Andrew B. Coxhead(3)

62,480

*Kent
A. Hansen(4)

11,723

*Richard T. Lane(5)

36,145

*Judith H. Hamilton(6)

59,566

*M.
Shân Atkins(7)

20,323

*Margaret A. Breya(7)

20,323

*Francis J. Jules(8)

20,323

*Thomas F. OToole(7)

20,323

*Richard K. Palmer(9)

44,061

*Douglas W. Stotlar(7)

20,323

*Shivan S. Subramaniam(10)

33,823

*All
directors and executive officers as a group

1,040,889

3.11%BlackRock, Inc.(11)

4,995,745

14.91%The
Vanguard Group(12)

2,168,093

6.47%Dimensional Fund Advisors LP(13)

1,841,059

5.49%  *
Less than one percent.  1
Reflects ownership of 421,862 shares of common stock held directly, 988 shares held in Mr. Quinlans
401(k) plan account, 59,717 RSAs that are subject to vesting and 107,000 options over common stock. Does not include 114,930 RSUs that are subject to vesting or 114,930 PSUs that are subject to performance based vesting conditions.  2
Reflects ownership of 74,575 shares of common stock held directly, 47 shares held in Ms. Bettmans
401(k) plan account and 27,287 RSAs that are subject to vesting. Does not include 34,930 RSUs that are subject to vesting or 22,240 PSUs subject to performance based vesting conditions.  3
Reflects ownership of 36,115 shares of common stock held directly and 26,365 RSAs that are subject to vesting.
Does not include 41,985 RSUs that are subject to vesting or 26,875 PSUs subject to performance based vesting conditions.  4
Reflects ownership of 5,005 shares of common stock held directly and 6,718 RSAs subject to vesting. Does not
include 31,610 RSUs that are subject to vesting or 5,560 PSUs subject to performance based vesting conditions.  5
Reflects ownership of 22,778 shares of common stock held directly and 13,367 RSAs that are subject to vesting.
Does not include 21,735 RSUs that are subject to vesting or 14,825 PSUs subject to performance based vesting conditions.  6
Reflects ownership of 30,552 shares of common stock held directly, and 15,940 RSUs that will vest on the earlier
of May 17, 2019 or when such director ceases to be a director, and 2,711 RSUs that will vest on the earlier of May 18, 2019 or when such director ceases to be a director and 10,363 RSUs that will vest when such director ceases to be a
director. Does not include 7,113.7645 shares of phantom stock that are settleable only in cash.  7
Reflects ownership of 9,428 shares of common stock held directly, and 10,895 RSUs that will vest when such
director ceases to be a director.  8
Reflects ownership of 9,428 shares of common stock held directly, and 10,895 RSUs that will vest on the earlier
of May 17, 2019 or when such director ceases to be a director.  9
Reflects ownership of 9,192 shares of common stock held directly, and 10,895 RSUs that will vest on the earlier
of May 17, 2019 or when such director ceases to be a director and 23,974 RSUs that will vest when such director ceases to be a director.  10
Reflects ownership of 22,928 shares of common stock held directly, and 10,895 RSUs that will vest when such
director ceases to be a director.  11
BlackRock, Inc. (BlackRock) is an investment advisor with a principal business office at 55 East
52nd Street, New York, New York 10055. This amount reflects the total shares held by BlackRock clients. BlackRock has sole investment authority over all shares, sole voting authority over 4,873,869 shares and no voting authority over 121,876 shares.  12
The Vanguard Group, Inc. (Vanguard) is an investment advisor with a principal business office at 100
Vanguard Boulevard, Malvern, Pennsylvania 19355. This amount reflects the total shares held by Vanguard clients. Vanguard has sole investment authority over 2,136,911 shares and shared investment authority over 31,182 shares, sole voting authority
over 30,941 shares, shared voting authority over 2,620 shares and no voting authority over 2,134,532 shares.  13
Dimensional Fund Advisors LP (Dimensional) is an investment advisor with a principal business office
at Building One, 6300 Bee Cave Road, Austin, Texas 78746. This amount reflects the total shares held by Dimensional in its capacity as an investment adviser to four investment companies and as investment manager or
sub-adviser to certain other commingled funds, group trusts and separate accounts. Dimensional has sole investment authority over all shares, sole voting authority over 1,752,579 shares, and no voting
authority over 88,480 shares.  36




---

##### Table of Contents

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR
INDEPENDENCE CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND POTENTIAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST; RELATED PARTY TRANSACTION APPROVAL POLICY The Company has a written policy relating to approval or ratification of all transactions involving an amount in excess of $120,000 in which the Company is a
participant and in which a related person has or will have a direct or indirect material interest, including without limitation any financial transaction, arrangement or relationship (including any indebtedness or guarantee of indebtedness) or any
series of similar transactions, arrangements or relationships, subject to certain enumerated exclusions. Under the policy, such related person transactions must be approved or ratified by (i) the Corporate Responsibility & Governance
Committee or (ii) if the Corporate Responsibility & Governance Committee determines that the approval or ratification of such transaction should be considered by all of the disinterested members of the Board, such disinterested members
of the Board by a majority vote. Related persons include any of our directors, certain executive officers, certain of our stockholders and their immediate family members. In considering whether to approve or ratify any related person transaction, the Corporate Responsibility & Governance Committee or such disinterested
members of the Board, as applicable, may consider all factors that they deem relevant to the transaction, including, but not limited to: the size of the transaction and the amount payable to or receivable from a related person; the nature of the
interest of the related person in the transaction; whether the transaction may involve a conflict of interest; and whether the transaction involves the provision of goods or services to the Company that are available from unaffiliated third parties
and, if so, whether the transaction is on terms and made under circumstances that are at least as favorable to the Company as would be available in comparable transactions with or involving unaffiliated third parties. To identify related person transactions, at least once a year all directors and executive officers of the Company are required to complete questionnaires
seeking, among other things, disclosure with respect to such transactions of which such director or executive officer may be aware. In addition, on an ongoing basis, each executive officer of the Company is required to advise the Chairman of the
Corporate Responsibility & Governance Committee of any related person transaction of which he or she becomes aware. DIRECTOR
INDEPENDENCE The Companys Principles of Corporate Governance provide that the Board must be composed of a majority of independent
directors. No director qualifies as independent unless the Board affirmatively determines that the director has no relationship which, in the opinion of the Board, would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the
responsibilities of a director. The Board has determined that all eight non-employee directors of our Board are independent in accordance with the NYSE requirements. Mr. Quinlan, who as an employee of the
Company, is not independent.  37




---

##### Table of Contents

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES Audit Fees  Deloitte & Touche LLP (Deloitte) was the Companys independent registered public accounting firm for the year ended
December 31, 2018. Total fees paid to Deloitte for audit services rendered during 2018 and 2017 were $2.6 million and $3.1 million respectively. Audit-Related Fees  Total fees paid to Deloitte for audit-related services rendered during 2018 were $0.3 million primarily related to
attestation reports for services that the Company provides to customers and during 2017 were $0.6 million, primarily related to attestation reports for services that the Company provides to customers as well as for services rendered by Deloitte
in connection with acquisition diligence services. Tax Fees  No fees were paid to Deloitte for tax services during 2018 or 2017. All Other Fees  No other fees were paid to Deloitte for any other services rendered during 2018 or 2017. Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policy  The Audit Committee has policies and procedures that require the
approval by the Audit Committee of all services performed by, and as necessary, fees paid to the Companys independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee approves the proposed services, including the scope of services
contemplated and the related fees, associated with the current year audit. In addition, Audit Committee pre-approval is also required for those engagements that may arise during the course of the year that are
outside the scope of the initial services and fees pre-approved by the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee pre-approves, up to an aggregate dollar amount and individual
dollar amount per engagement, certain permitted non-audit services anticipated to be provided by the Companys independent registered public accounting firm. In the event permitted non-audit service amounts exceed the thresholds established by the pre-approval policy, the Audit Committee must specifically approve such excess amounts. The Audit Committee
chairman has the authority to approve any services outside the specific pre-approved non-audit services and must report any such approval at the next meeting of the
Audit Committee. Pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the fees and services provided as noted above were authorized and approved by the Audit
Committee in compliance with the pre-approval policies and procedures described above. PART IV ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES (a) (3) Exhibits The
exhibits listed on the accompanying index are filed as part of this annual report on Form 10-K  38




---

##### Table of Contents

SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, on the 12th day of April 2019.  LSC COMMUNICATIONS, INC.By:

/ S / ANDREW B. COXHEADAndrew B. CoxheadChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
  39




---

##### Table of Contents

INDEX TO EXHIBITS  2.1



Separation and Distribution Agreement, dated as of September 14, 2016, by and among R. R. Donnelley 
& Sons Company, LSC Communications, Inc. and Donnelley Financial Solutions, Inc. (the Separation Agreement) 
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 3, 2016)2.2



Transition Services Agreement, dated as of September 14, 2016, between LSC Communications, Inc. and R. R. Donnelley 
& Sons Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.2 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 3, 2016)2.3



Transition Services Agreement, dated as of September 
14, 2016, between LSC Communications, Inc. and Donnelley Financial Solutions, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.3 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 3, 2016)2.4



Tax Disaffiliation Agreement, dated as of September 14, 2016, between LSC Communications, Inc. and R. R. Donnelley 
& Sons Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.4 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 3, 2016)2.5



Patent Assignment and License Agreement, dated as of September 27, 2016, between LSC Communications US, LLC and R. R. Donnelley 
& Sons Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.5 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 3, 2016)2.6



Trademark Assignment and License Agreement, dated as of September 
27, 2016, between LSC Communications US, LLC and R. R. Donnelley & Sons Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.6 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 
3, 2016)2.7



Data Assignment and License Agreement, dated as of September 27, 2016, between LSC Communications US, LLC and R. R. Donnelley 
& Sons Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.7 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 3, 2016)2.8



Software, Copyright and Trade Secret Assignment and License Agreement, dated as of September 
27, 2016, between LSC Communications US, LLC and R. R. Donnelley & Sons Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.8 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 
3, 2016)3.1



Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of LSC Communications, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Companys
 Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 3, 2016)3.2



Amended and Restated By-laws of LSC Communications, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to
 the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 3, 2016)4.1



Indenture, dated as of September 
30, 2016, among LSC Communications, Inc., the subsidiary guarantors party thereto and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee and as Collateral Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 3, 2016)4.2



Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of July 
28, 2017, by and among LSC Communications, Inc. Victor G. Warren Revocable Trust Dated July 
14, 1993, James Reifenberg, Mark Nickel, Phillip Warren and James M. Slattery (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-3 filed on October 2, 2017)10.1



Credit Agreement, dated as of September 
30, 2016, among LSC Communications, Inc., the lenders party thereto, Bank Of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent Swing Line Lender and an L/C Issuer, Citigroup Global Markets Inc. and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Co-Syndication Agents (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 3, 2016)10.2



Amendment No. 1 to Credit Agreement dated as of November 
17, 2017, by and among LSC Communications, Inc., the other Loan Parties, the 2017 Refinancing Term Lenders party thereto and Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent and collateral agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Companys
 Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2018, filed on May 3, 2018)  40




---

##### Table of Contents

10.3



Amendment No. 2 to Credit Agreement dated as of December 
20, 2018, by and among LSC Communications, Inc. the other Loan Parties, the Lenders party thereto and Bank of America, N. A., as administrative agent and collateral agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Companys Annual Report on
 Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018, filed on February 19, 2019)+10.4



2016 LSC Communications, Inc. Performance Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Companys Current Report on Form
 8-K filed on October 3, 2016)*10.5



Amended and Restated LSC Communications, Inc. 2016 Performance Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys
 Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 23, 2017)*10.6



LSC Communications, Inc. Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan, amended and restated effective as of August 
1, 2018 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on August 2, 2018)*10.7



LSC Unfunded Supplemental Pension Plan effective October 
1, 2016 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016, filed on February 23, 2017)*10.8



Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan-B for Designated Executives effective January 
1, 2001 as amended effective December 31, 2004, January 1, 2005 and September 
30, 2016 (the SERP-B) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 
31, 2016, filed on February 23, 2017)*10.9



LSC Communications Annual Incentive Plan as amended and restated effective January 
17, 2019 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018, filed on February 19, 2019)+*10.10



Assignment of Employment Agreement and Acceptance of Assignment, dated as of September 
29, 2016, between LSC Communications, Inc., R. R. Donnelley 
& Sons Company and Thomas J. Quinlan III (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 3, 2016)*10.11



Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated as of October 
25, 2017, between LSC Communications, Inc. and Thomas J. Quinlan III (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 31, 2017)*10.12



Key Employee Severance Plan effective October 
25, 2017 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2017, filed on November 2, 2017)*10.13



Form of Participation Agreement for the Key Employee Severance Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Current
 Report on Form 8-K, filed on January 19, 2018)*10.14



Participation Agreement between Suzanne S. Bettman and the Company, dated as of January 
24, 2018 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 26, 2018)*10.15



Participation Agreement between Andrew B. Coxhead and the Company, dated as of January 
24, 2018 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 26, 2018)*10.16



Participation Agreement between Kent A. Hansen and the Company, dated as of January 
24, 2018 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 26, 2018)*10.17



Participation Agreement between Richard T. Lane and the Company, dated as of January 
24, 2018 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 26, 2018)*10.18



Form of Stock Option Award Agreement (for 2009 to 2012) converted from R. R. Donnelley 
& Sons Company to the Company pursuant to the Separation Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17 to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 
31, 2016, filed on February 23, 2017)*10.19



Form of Founders Award (Restricted Stock) Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.25 to the Companys Annual Report
 on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016, filed on February 23, 2017)*  41




---

##### Table of Contents

10.20



Form of Performance Restricted Stock Award (for 2017) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.29 to the Companys Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2017, filed on May 4, 2017)*10.21



Form of Performance Unit Award Agreement (for 2018) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20 to the Companys Annual Report on Form
 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017, filed on February 22, 2018)*10.22



Form of Stock Unit Award Agreement (for 2016) converted from R. R. Donnelley 
& Sons Company to the Company pursuant to the Separation Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22 to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 
31, 2016, filed on February 23, 2017)*10.23



Form of Stock Unit Award Agreement (for 2017) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.30 to the Companys Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2017, filed on May 4, 2017)*10.24



Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement (for 2018) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.25 to the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017, filed on February 22, 2018)*10.25



Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement (for 2019) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.25 to the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018, filed on February 19, 2019)+*10.26



Form of Director Indemnification Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2016, filed on November 10, 2016)*10.27



Policy on Retirement Benefits, Phantom Stock Grants and Stock Options for Directors as amended to March 2000 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.16 to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016, filed on February 23, 2017)*10.28



Non-Employee Director Compensation Plan effective as of October 
30, 2018 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.28 to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018, filed on February 19, 2019)+*10.29



Form of Director Restricted Stock Unit Award as amended (for 2004-2007) converted from R. R. Donnelley 
& Sons Company to the Company pursuant to the Separation Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 
31, 2016, filed on February 23, 2017)*10.30



Form of Director Restricted Stock Unit Award (for 2014-2016) converted from R. R. Donnelley 
& Sons Company to the Company pursuant to the Separation Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 
31, 2016, filed on February 23, 2017)*10.31



Form of Director Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement (for 2018) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21 to the Companys Quarterly
 Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2017, filed on November 2, 2017)*14.1



Code of Ethics for the Chief Executive Officer and Senior Financial Officers (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 14.1 to the Companys
 Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016, filed on February 23, 2017)21.1



Subsidiaries of the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 21.1 to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018, filed on February 19, 2019)+23.1



Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 23.1 to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018, filed on February 19, 2019)+24.1



Powers of Attorney (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 24.1 to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018, filed on February 19, 2019)+31.1



Certification by Thomas J. Quinlan, III, Chief Executive Officer, required by Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 
15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 31.1 to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 
31, 2018, filed on February 19, 2019)+  42




---

##### Table of Contents

31.2



Certification by Andrew B. Coxhead, Chief Financial Officer, required by Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 
15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 31.2 to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 
31, 2018, filed on February 19, 2019)+31.3



Certification by Thomas J. Quinlan, III, Chief Executive Officer, required by Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 
15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (filed herewith)31.4



Certification by Andrew B. Coxhead, Chief Financial Officer, required by Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 
15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (filed herewith)32.1



Certification by Thomas J. Quinlan, III, Chief Executive Officer, required by Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Section 
1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 32.1 to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 
31, 2018, filed on February 19, 2019)+32.2



Certification by Andrew B. Coxhead, Chief Financial Officer, required by Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Section 
1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 32.2 to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 
31, 2018, filed on February 19, 2019)+101.INS



XBRL Instance Document+101.SCH



XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document+101.CAL



XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document+101.DEF



XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document+101.LAB



XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document+101.PREXBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document+   + Previously filed with the Original Form 10-K * Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement  43