alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 251 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Whereas in 1977 the Solar Energy Research Institute opened 

and was designated a National Laboratory of the United 

States Department of Energy; 

Whereas in September 1991 President George H.W. Bush 

changed the institute’s name to the National Renewable 

Energy Laboratory (‘‘NREL’’); 
2 

•HCON 251 EH 

Whereas the NREL is the principal research laboratory for 

the United States Department of Energy’s Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy and also provides 

research expertise for the Office of Science and the Office 

of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability; 

Whereas the NREL is the Nation’s, and the world’s, preeminent laboratory for renewable energy and energy efficiency research and development; 

Whereas renewable energy and energy efficiency technologies 

are key to creating a clean energy future for not only the 

United States, but the world; 

Whereas the NREL’s focused research and development capabilities are positioned to advance national energy goals 

by developing innovations to change the way we power 

our homes and businesses, and fuel our cars; 

Whereas the NREL has worked vigorously through research 

and development to develop wind energy resulting in innovative designs, larger turbines, and increased efficiencies leading to dramatic reductions in energy costs; 

Whereas the NREL has also developed hydrogen energy scenarios that could be used to power the future and develop 

hydrogen infrastructure and delivery systems; and 

Whereas the NREL has developed biomass research technology, which provides biomass industries with rapid analytical tools for making the highest value applications of 

biomass or analyzing biomass: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That Congress— 

3 (1) commends the National Renewable Energy 

4 Laboratory for its work of promoting energy effi-
3 

•HCON 251 EH 

1 ciency for 30 years and seeking other avenues of en2 ergy independence because it enhances our national 

3 security, sustains our environment and creates jobs; 

4 (2) recognizes the achievements of the scientists 

5 and employees of the NREL and their exemplary 

6 service to the United States for 30 years; and 

7 (3) directs the Clerk of the House to transmit 

8 a copy of this resolution to the NREL for appro9 priate display. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 5, 

2007. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 251 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Commending the National Renewable Energy Labciency for 30 years. oratory for its work of promoting energy effi-
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

APRIL 22, 2009

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 08-13521

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 02-00008-CR-6

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

WILLIAM ERIC GREEN,

a.k.a. Cuzzo,

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Georgia

_________________________

(April 22, 2009)

Before BARKETT, MARCUS and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

William Green, a pro se federal prisoner convicted of crack cocaine
offenses, appeals the district court’s limited reduction of his sentence, pursuant to

18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). The district court found that Amendment 706 to the

United States Sentencing Guidelines was applicable to Green and reduced his

previous offense level from 34 to 32 and his original sentence from 240 months’

imprisonment to 235 months’ imprisonment.

On appeal Green contends that the district court erred by (1) not

resentencing him below his amended Guidelines range and not applying

intervening Supreme Court caselaw; (2) not granting a downward departure from

the amended guideline range after considering his post-sentence rehabilitation; (3)

not appointing counsel; (4) failing to provide a new or updated PSI; and (5) ruling

on his § 3582(c)(2) motion before ruling on his second or successive 28 U.S.C.

§ 2255 motion.

Green’s first argument is foreclosed by this court’s recent decision in United

States v. Melvin, — F.3d —, 2009 WL 236053 (11th Cir. 2009) (holding that, in

resentencing pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2), a district court is bound by the

applicable policy statement of the Sentencing Commission that prohibits the

district court from imposing a sentence that is less than the minimum of the

amended guidelines range). We find no merit in Green’s remaining arguments.

AFFIRMED.

2
# C_2017014EN.01000801.xml

| 16.1.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 14/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.1.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 14/8

---

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 15 November 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de la Comunidad Autónoma del País Vasco — Spain) — Gorka Salaberria Sorondo v Academia Vasca de Policía y Emergencias

(Case C-258/15) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Equal treatment in employment and occupation - Directive 2000/78/EC - Article 2(2) and Article 4(1) - Discrimination on grounds of age - Recruitment of police officers of the Autonomous Community of the Basque Country restricted to candidates under 35 years of age - Concept of ‘genuine and determining occupational requirement’ - Objective pursued - Proportionality))

(2017/C 014/10)

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Tribunal Superior de Justicia de la Comunidad Autónoma del País Vasco

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Gorka Salaberria Sorondo

Defendant: Academia Vasca de Policía y Emergencias

Operative part of the judgment

Article 2(2) of Council Directive 2000/78/EC of 27 November 2000, establishing a general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation, read together with Article 4(1) of that directive, must be interpreted as not precluding legislation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which provides that candidates for posts as police officers who are to perform all the operational duties incumbent on police officers must be under 35 years of age.

---

(1)  
  OJ C 270, 17.8.2015.

---
### SERVICE LIST

A copy of the foregoing document has been served this 8th day of August, 2012, upon the

following persons via email:

francis.heil@aa.com

robert.wirick@aa.com

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com

benjamin.slocum@usairways.com

howard.kass@usairways.com

jhill@dowlohnes.com

john.allen@faa.gov dan.weiss@ united. com

jon athan .linde@united.com

steve.morrissey@united.com

gmurphy@crowell.c om

lhalloway@crowell.com
SUPPLEMENT TO AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN
               HIGH SPEED NET SOLUTIONS, INC. AND WILLIAM DUNAVANT

    WHEREAS,  on or about  January 15,  1999,  the parties  entered into an oral
agreement (the "Oral  Agreement") for the exchange of common stock of High Speed
Net Solutions, Inc. for common stock of Summus Technologies, Inc.; and

    WHEREAS,  the  parties  have just now  memorialized  the Oral  Agreement  in
writing by a written  agreement  (the "Written  Agreement")  dated and effective
August 13, 1999 by and between the parties.

    NOW THEREFORE, it is agreed as follows:

1.  The actual  effective  date for the Written  Agreement  shall be January 15,
    1999.

                                        HIGH SPEED NET SOLUTIONS, INC.


/s/ William R. Dunavant                 By: /s/ Michael M. Cimino
----------------------------               -------------------------------------
William R. Dunavant                        Michael Cimino, Chairman of the Board
December 13, 1999



Greka Integrated, Inc.
Saba Realty, Inc.
Santa Maria Refining Company
3201 Air Park Drive
Suite 201
Santa Maria, CA 93455

Ladies/Gentlemen:

         Reference is made to the First  Amended and Restated  Loan and Security
Agreement  between  us  dated  as  of  November  30,  1999,  as  amended  and/or
supplemented (the  "Agreement").  Capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein
shall have the meaning ascribed as such terms in the Agreement.

         This letter will  confirm that the  Agreement is hereby  amended in the
following manner:

1.                The  Schedule  to Section  12(cc) of the  Agreement  is hereby
                  amended  by adding to such  Schedule  the  property  and Lease
                  descriptions annexed hereto as Schedule A.

2.                Section 12(cc)(5) of the Agreement is hereby amended by adding
                  the  following  sentence  immediately  after  the  end of such
                  paragraph:  "Santa  Maria will use its  reasonably  commercial
                  efforts to obtain the  consent of the Lessor  under any of the
                  Leases  which  may  now  or  hereafter   become  necessary  in
                  connection  with the  assignment of any such Lease or interest
                  therein to Lender."

          Except as heretofore and hereby amended, the Agreement shall remain in
full force and effect in accordance with its original terms.


<PAGE>


Greka Integrated, Inc.
Saba Realty, Inc.
Santa Maria Refining Company
December 13, 1999
Page 2




         Please  indicate  your  agreement to the foregoing by signing below and
delivering a copy of this letter to our offices.

                                           Very truly yours,


                                           GMAC COMMERCIAL CREDIT  LLC

                                           By:/s/Frank Imperato, SVP
                                              ----------------------------
                                                Its

READ AND AGREED TO:

GREKA INTEGRATED, INC.


By:/s/ Randeep S. Grewal
   -------------------------------
   Its Chairman, CEO & President



SABA REALTY, INC.


By:/s/ Randeep S. Grewal
   -------------------------------
   Its Chairman, CEO & President



SANTA MARIA REFINING COMPANY


By:/s/ Randeep S. Grewal
   -------------------------------
   Its Chairman, CEO & President






                                      -2-
# C_2017151EN.01002902.xml

| 15.5.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 151/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.5.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 151/29

---

Judgment of the General Court of 28 March 2017 — Deutsche Telekom v Commission

(Case T-210/15) (1)

1

((Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Documents relating to a procedure for the application of the competition rules - Refusal to grant access - Duty to state reasons - Exception relating to the protection of the commercial interests of a third party - Exception relating to the protection of the purpose of inspections, investigations and audits - Overriding public interest - Consultation with third parties - Transparency - No response to a confirmatory request with the time limits))

(2017/C 151/36)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Deutsche Telekom AG (Bonn, Germany) (represented by: A. Rosenfeld and O. Corzilius, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented initially by J. Vondung and A. Buchet, and subsequently by F. Erlbacher, P. Van Nuffel and A. Dawes, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application pursuant to Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of the Commission decision of 17 February 2015 refusing to grant the applicant access to documents relating to the procedure for abuse of dominant position with reference COMP/AT.40089 — Deutsche Telekom.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action.

| 2. | Deutsche Telekom AG is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Deutsche Telekom AG is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 270, 17.8.2015.

1

---
No. 50693.

#### Protests 114445-K, etc., of W. F. Mackay et al. (Pembina).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as that passed upon in *Tower & Sons*v. *United States*(14 Cust. Ct. 94, C. D. 919). In accordance therewith the merchandise was held entitled to free entry as claimed.
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Employment Outlook for Physicists

              																	Seltzer, Norman					,	Cain, Robert William					,	United States. Veterans Administration					 and 	United States. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 						*Employment Outlook for Physicists : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 1144*,												Washington: 								U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 										1953,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/4462,			accessed on September 25, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
No. 39082.

#### Protests 421918-G, etc., of Goodman & Dessauer (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

The record established that certain items consist of articles in chief value of cellulose filaments similar to those involved in Abstract 37230. The claim at 60 percent under paragraph 31 was therefore sustained.
Case No. 9,931.

#### MUNS v. DE NEMOURS.

[2 Wash. C. C. 463.] 1

Circuit Court, D. Pennsylvania.

April Term, 1810.

Removal of Causes — Amount Involved — Action fok Damages.

1. In a case removed by the defendant from the state court to the circuit court, on the ground that the defendant was an alien, the damages laid in the writ exceeded five hundred dollars, and bail to a much larger amount was given, which were *held*sufficient to give jurisdiction.

2. It has been frequently determined, that the damages laid in the declaration, give the jurisdiction as to the matter in dispute.

[Cited in Ladd v. Tudor. Case No. 7.975; Ka-nouse v. Martin, 15 How. (56 U. S.) 208.]

[Cited in Abbott v. Gateh. 13 Md. 335.]

3. The damages laid in the writ, and in the plaintiff’s affidavit, are equally conclusive, as to the amount in controversy, for the purposes of jurisdiction.

This was an action-brought in the state court, and sounds altogether in damages. The damages laid in the writ exceeded five hundred dollars, and bail to a larger amount was given there, and had been given here. The state court having, upon the petition of the defendant [Dupont de Nemours], directed the cause to be removed to this court, the defendant being an alien, the only question was. whether it ought to be received and docketed, the damages being uncertain.

1

 [Originally published from the MSS. of Hon. Bushrod Washington, Associate Justice of the supreme court of the United States, under the supervision of Richard Peters, Jr., Esq.]

BY THE COURT.

It has been frequently determined, that the damages laid in the declaration, gives the jurisdiction as to the matter in dispute. The damages laid in the writ, and established by the affidavit of the plaintiff, on which bail has been taken, is equally conclusive, or else no suit could be removed from a state to a federal court, where the claim is for damages; since the petition to remove must be at the time of entering an appearance, before the declaration is usually filed. Action ordered to be docketed.

[At the trial of this cause the plaintiff was nonsuited. Case No. 9,926.]
Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

Docket Number: FAA- 2011-0255

Directorate Identifier: 2010NM253AD

A310-24-2106 --- 5/27/10

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         102,856
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   30,477
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,947
<INVENTORY>                                     23,840
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               171,822
<PP&E>                                         164,623
<DEPRECIATION>                                  83,267
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 260,300
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           31,934
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           325
<OTHER-SE>                                     223,147
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   260,300
<SALES>                                         50,431
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                50,431
<CGS>                                           25,727
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   25,727
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,235
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,204
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,031
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,031
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .06


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 87 (Monday, May 7, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 25830]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-8602]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration <greek-i>10855 and <greek-i>10856]


New Jersey Disaster Number NJ-00006

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Amendment 1.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a 
major disaster for the State of New Jersey (FEMA-1694-DR), dated 04/26/
2007.
    Incident: Severe Storms and Inland and Coastal Flooding.
    Incident Period: 04/14/2007 through 04/20/2007.

EFFECTIVE DATE: 04/27/2007.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 06/25/2007.
    EIDL Loan Application Deadline Date: 01/28/2008.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of the Presidential disaster 
declaration for the State of NEW JERSEY, dated 04/26/2007 is hereby 
amended to include the following areas as adversely affected by the 
disaster:

Primary Counties:
    Middlesex, Morris, Hudson.
Contiguous Counties: New Jersey:
    Warren.

    All other information in the original declaration remains 
unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

Herbert L. Mitchell,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. E7-8602 Filed 5-4-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
# C_2017283EN.01003601.xml

| 28.8.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 283/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.8.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 283/36

---

Judgment of the General Court of 19 July 2017 — DD v FRA

(Case T-742/15 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - Civil service - Members of the temporary staff - Contract of indefinite duration - Disciplinary penalty - Reprimand - Termination of contract - Right to be heard - Non-material harm))

(2017/C 283/53)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Appellant: DD (represented: initially, by L. Levi and M. Vandenbussche and, subsequently, by L. Levi, lawyers)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) (represented by: M. O’Flaherty, acting as Agent, assisted by B. Wägenbaur, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 8 October 2015, DD v FRA (F-106/13 and F-25/14, EU:F:2015:118), seeking to have that judgment set aside.

DD

FRA

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders DD to bear his own costs; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders DD to bear his own costs;

| 3. | Orders the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 111, 29.3.2016.

1

---