JUDGMENT OF THE GENERAL COURT (Sixth Chamber)

20 July 2017 ([\*](#Footnote*))

(EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for an EU figurative mark representing a curved and angled line — Earlier EU figurative mark representing a capital letter ‘D’ — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

In Case T‐521/15,

**Diesel SpA,** established in Breganze (Italy), represented by A. Gaul, M. Frank, A. Parassina and K. Dani, lawyers,

applicant,

v

**European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO),** represented by J. Ivanauskas and A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agents,

defendant,

the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court, being

**Sprinter megacentros del deporte, SL,** established in Elche (Spain), represented by S. Malynicz QC,

ACTION brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 18 June 2015 (Case R 3291/2014-2), relating to opposition proceedings between Diesel and Sprinter megacentros del deporte,

THE GENERAL COURT (Sixth Chamber),

composed of G. Berardis, President, D. Spielmann and Z. Csehi (Rapporteur), Judges,

Registrar: I. Dragan, Administrator,

having regard to the application lodged at the Court Registry on 7 September 2015,

Having regard to the response of EUIPO lodged at the Court Registry on 9 December 2015,

having regard to the response of the intervener lodged at the Court Registry on 21 December 2015,

having regard to the reassignment of the case to the Sixth Chamber and to a new Judge-Rapporteur,

further to the hearing on 26 April 2017,

gives the following

Judgment

 Background to the dispute

1        On 6 December 2012, the intervener, Sprinter megacentros del deporte, SL, filed an application for registration of an EU trade mark with the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) pursuant to Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the European Union trade mark (OJ 2009 L 78, p. 1).

2        Registration as a mark was sought for the following figurative sign:

![Image not found](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)

3        The goods in respect of which registration was sought are in Classes 18, 25 and 28 of the Nice Agreement concerning the International Classification of Goods and Services for the Purposes of the Registration of Marks of 15 June 1957, as revised and amended, and correspond, for each of those classes, to the following description:

–        Class 18: ‘Leather and imitations of leather, and goods made of these materials and not included in other classes; animal skins, hides; trunks and travelling bags; umbrellas, parasols and walking sticks; whips, harness and saddlery; vanity cases; holdalls, back packs and rucksacks; wallets, key cases, purses and pouches; credit card cases, tote bags, bottle bags, record bags, book bags; handbags; sports bags; sports holdalls; shopping bags; luggage and suitcases; weekend bags; jewellery rolls; attaché cases and briefcases; parts and fittings for all the aforesaid goods’;

–        Class 25: ‘Clothing; football boots; rugby boots; training shoes; running shoes; tennis shoes; indoor sports shoes; headgear; belts’;

–        Class 28: ‘Gymnastic and sporting articles and equipment; games and playthings; parts and fittings for all the aforesaid goods’.

4        The EU trade mark application was published in *Community Trade Marks Bulletin* No 5/2013 of 8 January 2013.

5        On 5 April 2013, the applicant, Diesel SpA, filed a notice of opposition pursuant to Article 41 of Regulation No 207/2009 to registration of the mark applied for in respect of the goods referred to in paragraph 3 above.

6        The opposition was based on, inter alia, the earlier EU figurative mark reproduced below, which was registered on 19 February 1999 under the number 000583708 :

![Image not found](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)

7        The goods covered by the earlier mark were in, inter alia, Classes 18 and 25 and corresponded, for each of those classes, to the following description:

–        Class 18: ‘Leather and imitation of leather and goods made of these materials and not included in other classes; animal skins, hides, trunks and travelling bags; umbrellas, parasols and walking sticks, whips, harness and saddlery’;

–        Class 25: ‘Clothing, footwear, headgear’.

8        The ground relied on in support of the opposition was that set out in Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.

9        On 31 October 2014, the Opposition Division rejected the opposition.

10      On 29 December 2014, the applicant filed a notice of appeal with EUIPO, pursuant to Articles 58 to 64 of Regulation No 207/2009, against the decision of the Opposition Division.

11      By decision of 18 June 2015 (‘the contested decision’), the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO dismissed the appeal. In particular, after finding that the relevant public consisted of the general public in the European Union, the level of attention of which was average, it upheld the Opposition Division’s decision, pointing out that:

–        whereas the earlier mark clearly resembled a capital letter ‘D’, the mark applied for represented, rather, a basic geometrical shape; although it could not be completely excluded that a small part of the public might perceive the mark applied for as a capital letter ‘D’, that possibility seemed, however, unlikely;

–        from a visual standpoint, the marks at issue have clear visual differences that outweigh the similarities, which, in the overall visual impression, are not particularly strong; they are phonetically and conceptually identical, but only in the unlikely event that part of the relevant public perceives the contested sign as the graphic representation of a capital letter ‘D’, whereas, for the remaining public, the phonetic and conceptual comparison is not relevant or impossible, respectively;

–        the distinctive character of the earlier mark is weak in relation to the goods concerned in Classes 18 and 25;

–        the fact that, for part of the relevant public, the marks at issue may be perceived as a capital letter ‘D’ and that they may have the concept of that letter in common is not sufficient to create a likelihood of confusion; even in that situation, the Board of Appeal must take care not to apportion excessive weight to a coincidence of features which are merely generic to the capital letter ‘D’ and must pay particular attention to the specific features which are not generic to the letter ‘D’; in the present case, the contested sign does not share any of the earlier sign’s specific features.

12      The Board of Appeal concluded that notwithstanding the principles of interdependence and of imperfect recollection on the part of the public, there was no reason to assume that the relevant public in the European Union would be misled into thinking that goods bearing the signs at issue, even if they were identical, came from the same undertaking or, as the case might be, from undertakings that were economically linked, even taking into account the normal level of attention of the relevant public. Consequently, it did not consider it necessary to examine and compare the goods or to determine whether the applicant had proved genuine use of the earlier mark, within the meaning of Article 42(2) of Regulation No 207/2009, following the request to that effect which the intervener had made before the Opposition Division.

 Forms of order sought

13      The applicant claims that the Court should:

–        annul the contested decision;

–        order EUIPO to pay the costs.

14      EUIPO contends that the Court should:

–        dismiss the action in its entirety;

–        order the applicant to pay the costs.

15      The intervener contends that the Court should:

–        uphold the contested decision;

–        order the applicant to pay the costs of the intervener and to bear its own costs.

 Law

 The admissibility of certain annexes to the application

16      EUIPO submits that certain annexes to the application, namely Annexes I 3 et I 4, which were submitted for the first time before the Court and not in the course of the proceedings before EUIPO, must be declared inadmissible. Those annexes relate to samples, found on the internet, of the stylised capital letter ‘D’ used by the Walt Disney Company and of other capital letters ‘D’, which the applicant has produced to support the argument that the contested mark will be perceived by the relevant public as a representation of the capital letter ‘D’.

17      In that regard, it must be pointed out that those documents, which were produced for the first time before the Court, cannot be taken into consideration. The purpose of actions before the Court is to review the legality of decisions of the Boards of Appeal of EUIPO for the purposes of Article 65 of Regulation No 207/2009, so it is not the Court’s function to review the facts in the light of documents produced for the first time before it. Accordingly, the abovementioned documents must be excluded and there is no need to assess their probative value (see, to that effect, judgment of 24 November 2005, *Sadas* v *OHIM — LTJ Diffusion (ARTHUR ET FELICIE)*, T‐346/04, EU:T:2005:420, paragraph 19 and the case-law cited).

 The single plea in law, alleging infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009

18      In support of the action, the applicant relies on a single plea in law, alleging infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.

19      It submits, in essence, that the Board of Appeal erred in finding that there was no likelihood of confusion between the marks at issue. In the first place, it maintains that, contrary to what the Board of Appeal stated, a significant part of the relevant public will perceive the sign applied for as a capital letter ‘D’. It takes the view that that sign consists of all the elements that are necessary to form a typical capital letter ‘D’. In the second place, the applicant submits that the signs are phonetically and conceptually identical and visually similar for a significant part of the relevant public. In particular, as regards the visual similarity, the applicant puts forward the argument that, even though there are differences between the marks at issue, those differences do not outweigh the elements which are similar. In the third place, the applicant disputes the Board of Appeal’s finding regarding the distinctive character of the earlier mark, submitting that that mark has a normal level of distinctiveness which it derives not only from the fact that it represents the capital letter ‘D’, but also from its unique stylisation, which will be kept in mind by a significant part of the public.

20      EUIPO and the intervener dispute the applicant’s arguments.

 Preliminary observations

21      It must be borne in mind that the legislature expressly included signs consisting of a letter in the list, set out in Article 4 of Regulation No 207/2009, of examples of signs which may constitute an EU trade mark and that Articles 7 and 8 of that regulation, relating to refusal of registration, do not lay down specific rules for signs consisting of a letter or a combination of letters which does not form a word. It follows that the global assessment of the likelihood of confusion between such signs pursuant to Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 in principle follows the same rules as those relating to word signs comprising a word, a name or a fanciful term (see, to that effect, judgment of 6 October 2004, *New Look* v *OHIM — Naulover (NLSPORT, NLJEANS, NLACTIVE and NLCollection)*, T‐117/03 to T‐119/03 and T‐171/03, EU:T:2004:293, paragraphs 47 and 48).

22      Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 provides that, upon opposition by the proprietor of an earlier trade mark, the trade mark applied for must not be registered if because of its identity with, or similarity to, the earlier trade mark and the identity or similarity of the goods or services covered by the trade marks, there exists a likelihood of confusion on the part of the public in the territory in which the earlier trade mark is protected. The likelihood of confusion includes the likelihood of association with the earlier trade mark.

23      According to settled case-law, the risk that the public may believe that the goods or services in question come from the same undertaking or from economically-linked undertakings constitutes a likelihood of confusion. According to the same case-law, the likelihood of confusion must be assessed globally, according to the relevant public’s perception of the signs and goods or services in question and taking into account all factors relevant to the circumstances of the case, in particular the interdependence between the similarity of the signs and that of the goods or services covered (see judgment of 9 July 2003, *Laboratorios RTB* v *OHIM — Giorgio Beverly Hills (GIORGIO BEVERLY HILLS)*, T‐162/01, EU:T:2003:199, paragraphs 30 to 33 and the case-law cited).

24      For the purposes of applying Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009, a likelihood of confusion presupposes both that the marks at issue are identical or similar and that the goods or services which they cover are identical or similar. Those conditions are cumulative (see judgment of 22 January 2009, *Commercy* v *OHIM — easyGroup IP Licensing (easyHotel)*, T‐316/07, EU:T:2009:14, paragraph 42 and the case-law cited).

25      In the global assessment of the likelihood of confusion, account should be taken of the average consumer of the category of goods concerned, who is reasonably well informed and reasonably observant and circumspect. Account should, however, be taken of the fact that the average consumer only rarely has a chance to compare the various marks directly, but must rely on his imperfect recollection of them. It should also be borne in mind that the average consumer’s level of attention is likely to vary according to the category of goods or services in question (see judgment of 13 February 2007, *Mundipharma* v *OHIM — Altana Pharma (RESPICUR)*, T 256/04, EU:T:2007:46, paragraph 42 and the case-law cited).

26      The Court will examine, in the light of those considerations, whether the Board of Appeal was right in finding, in the contested decision, that there was no likelihood of confusion between the signs at issue.

27      As a preliminary point, it is appropriate to confirm the definition of the relevant public set out by the Board of Appeal in paragraph 38 of the contested decision, a definition which is not, moreover, disputed by the applicant and is that that public corresponds, owing to the earlier mark’s registration as an EU trade mark and the nature of the goods covered by the signs at issue, to the general public in the European Union, the level of attention of which is average.

 Comparison of the signs

28      The global assessment of the likelihood of confusion must, so far as concerns the visual, phonetic or conceptual similarity of the signs at issue, be based on the overall impression given by the signs, bearing in mind, in particular, their distinctive and dominant elements. The perception of the marks by the average consumer of the goods or services in question plays a decisive role in the global assessment of that likelihood of confusion. In this regard, the average consumer normally perceives a mark as a whole and does not engage in an analysis of its various details (see judgment of 12 June 2007, *OHIM* v *Shaker*, C‐334/05 P, EU:C:2007:333, paragraph 35 and the case-law cited).

29      In the present case, first of all, the Board of Appeal found, as is apparent from paragraph 43 of the contested decision, that the marks at issue were purely figurative marks. Subsequently, in paragraphs 44 to 61 of the contested decision, the Board of Appeal compared the signs at issue visually, phonetically and conceptually and found that, whereas the earlier sign clearly resembled a capital letter ‘D’, the possibility that the sign applied for would be perceived as a capital letter ‘D’ seemed unlikely. It also pointed out, first, that, even assuming that part of the public would see a capital letter ‘D’ in the contested sign, there were obvious visual differences between the signs at issue which outweighed the similarities and, secondly, that the signs at issue were admittedly phonetically and conceptually identical, but only in the unlikely event that part of the relevant public perceived the sign applied for as the graphic representation of a capital letter ‘D’, whereas, for the remaining public, the phonetic and conceptual comparison was not relevant or impossible, respectively.

30      The applicant disputes the Board of Appeal’s assessments in the contested decision which relate to the perception that the relevant public is likely to have of the signs at issue. Although it acknowledges that the earlier mark resembles a capital letter ‘D’, it submits, by contrast, that a significant part of the public will also perceive the mark applied for as a capital letter ‘D’.

–       The relevant public’s perception of the signs at issue

31      The signs to be compared are the following:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| Image not found | Image not found |
| Earlier mark | Mark applied for |

32      In the first place, as regards the earlier EU trade mark, the Court endorses the Board of Appeal’s finding, in paragraph 47 of the contested decision, that the earlier mark could be perceived as a capital letter ‘D’, a finding which has not, moreover, been disputed by the applicant or by the intervener.

33      In the second place, as regards the mark applied for, first, it must be pointed out that, as the applicant submits, that mark has all the elements that make up a capital letter ‘D’, namely the curved bowl on the right-hand side, the oblique stem, with a slant that gives an impression of verticality, on the left-hand side between the ends of the bowl, and a framed counter between the bowl and the stem.

34      Secondly, the applicant’s argument that the presence of serifs is not an element that is essential for the mark applied for to be recognised as a capital letter ‘D’ must be endorsed. Consequently, the lack of a serif in the lower part of the mark applied for, which is, in any event, insufficient to refute the fact that the mark applied for will be perceived as a capital letter ‘D’, is inconsequential.

35      Thirdly, the argument on the part of the Board of Appeal and of EUIPO that the lower part of the line in the mark applied for, which has a slanted turn upwards at the end, will not be seen as a stem, which is one of the essential elements of the letter ‘D’, is not convincing. As the applicant correctly observes, the presence of a stem which is vertical and attached to the upper and lower parts of the bowl is not a standard characteristic which is an obligatory part of the stylisation of a capital letter ‘D’, as the stem may be slanted and not attached to the bowl. That finding seems, moreover, to be confirmed by EUIPO in its written pleadings because it observes that, in the standard typewritten form of a capital letter ‘D’, the stem is ‘normally’ straight and is connected with the upper and the lower parts of the bowl.

36      Fourthly, it must be pointed out that, as the applicant submits, since the gap between the stem and the upper line of the mark creating the bowl is very small, it cannot be held that there is no counter framed by the bowl and the stem of the mark applied for. In addition, that gap cannot appreciably detract from the contested sign’s being perceived as a capital letter ‘D’. It is very likely that the gap between the stem and the upper horizontal line in the mark applied for will be perceived by the relevant public as a stylistic variation which has been made to the mark applied for in order to differentiate it from the classic and standard version of a capital letter ‘D’. Furthermore, in that regard, it must be pointed out that, in the clothing and fashion sector in general, the relevant public is used to seeing goods bearing figurative signs the design of which is original as compared with the standard version of those signs. It is also common in that sector for the same mark to be configured in various different ways according to the goods which it designates or to particular periods in time (see, to that effect, judgment of 10 May 2011, *Emram* v *OHIM — Guccio Gucci (G)*, T‐187/10, not published, EU:T:2011:202, paragraph 71 and the case-law cited).

37      In view of the foregoing, it must be pointed out that, even though it is true that, compared with the classic form of the capital letter ‘D’, there are variations in the mark applied for, the possibility of that mark being perceived as representing that letter cannot, contrary to what the Board of Appeal states in paragraph 50 of the contested decision, be regarded as remote. On the contrary, it is highly likely that, in the light of the specific characteristics of that mark, a non-negligible part of the relevant public will perceive the mark applied for as a stylised capital letter ‘D’.

38      Consequently, the Board of Appeal erred in finding, in paragraph 47 of the contested decision, that only a small part of the relevant public will perceive the mark applied for as a capital letter ‘D’.

39      That finding cannot be called into question by EUIPO’s argument that the applicant compared the mark applied for with the handwritten version of the capital letter ‘D’ and not with the typewritten form of that letter. The elements that are characteristic of the capital letter ‘D’ can be identified in the mark applied for irrespective of the handwritten or typewritten form taken into account.

40      That conclusion is, moreover, borne out, first, by the fact that, as the applicant pointed out before the Board of Appeal, the intervener itself regards the marks at issue as a capital letter ‘D’. In comparing those marks before the Opposition Division, the intervener stated, without any hesitation and without allowing for any exceptions, that they clearly consisted of two capital letters ‘D’. Secondly, contrary to what EUIPO and the intervener submit, that finding is also borne out by the fact that, in the opposition proceedings filed under the number 002164104, which were brought by Calzaturificio dal bello Srl against the registration of the mark applied for which is the subject of the present case, the intervener, as well as the opponent in those proceedings, referred to the mark applied for as a ‘D’ device.

41      In addition, it must be pointed out that the Board of Appeal did not, in the present case, state which basic geometrical shape it regarded the mark applied for as referring to. It did not, moreover, put forward any argument to show that the relevant public would perceive the mark applied for as a basic geometrical shape. Likewise, when that question was put to it at the hearing, EUIPO was not able to specify which basic geometrical shape it regarded the mark applied for as referring to.

42      It is in the light of the foregoing observations and the case-law referred to in paragraph 28 above that it is necessary to examine whether the Board of Appeal erred as regards the assessment as to whether the signs at issue are similar from the visual, phonetic and conceptual standpoints.

–       The visual similarity

43      In paragraph 48 of the contested decision, the Board of Appeal acknowledged, first of all, that the signs at issue had in common their nature and composition to the extent that they were purely figurative signs which were composed of one or more lines the width of which was similar in some places and which formed two rounded angles at the right. It stated that they also have in common the fact that both have two horizontal lines which are parallel and two vertically-oriented lines which are not completely parallel.

44      It subsequently found that, even assuming that part of the public might see a capital letter ‘D’ in the mark applied for, that mark did not share any of the specific features of the earlier mark given that the stem is not completely vertical and its upper line is not attached to the horizontal part, thus resulting in an opening, from which it is, in its view, apparent that the mark applied for does not have a closed counter. It took the view that the lower part does not have a serif and the curved stroke creates a vertical line to the right, with two identical angles, contrary to the angles in the earlier mark. The Board of Appeal concluded from that that each of the individual differences between the signs combined together is sufficient to outweigh the elements in common, which are also, in the overall visual impression, not particularly pronounced.

45      The applicant disputes as incorrect the Board of Appeal’s finding regarding the visual similarity, submitting, in essence, that all the characteristic elements of the earlier mark, which depicts a capital letter ‘D’, are contained in the mark applied for. It maintains that both marks therefore consist of the essential elements which are necessary to form the capital letter ‘D’. In its view, the differences between the signs at issue do not outweigh their similarities.

46      In that regard, in the first place, it must be pointed out that, although it is indeed true that there are some graphic differences between the marks at issue, differences which were pointed out by the Board of Appeal and which relate to the fact that, in the contested sign, the stem, instead of being completely vertical, slants to the left and is not connected to the upper horizontal line in that sign, or to the lack of a serif in the lower part of the mark applied for, the fact remains that, quite irrespective of whether there is a link between the capital letter ‘D’ and the mark applied for, those differences are very slight stylistic differences, which are of minor importance compared with the similarities between the marks at issue.

47      Those stylistic differences cannot dispel the impression of similarity which is apparent from the overall visual comparison of the marks at issue. That impression is due, first of all, to the overall shape of those two marks and to the presence of two horizontal lines which are parallel and two vertically-oriented lines, which are not completely parallel, but contribute towards giving both marks the same dynamism. Secondly, that impression is also due to the overall proportions which are similar, to the width of the lines and to the presence of two rounded angles on the right. Lastly, the impression of similarity is due to the linear layout of the two marks at issue and to the same black on white colour of their layout. Those findings are, moreover, valid irrespective of whether the relevant public perceives the mark applied for as a capital letter ‘D’.

48      In the second place, it must be stated that, in order to grasp the differences between the two marks at issue, the consumer would have to carry out a very detailed examination of those marks, which is unlikely given that, as was pointed out in paragraph 25 above, the average consumer only rarely has a chance to compare the various marks directly next to one another, but must rely on his imperfect recollection of them. Furthermore, in the clothing sector, marks which are small in relation to the goods as a whole are often affixed to those goods, with the result that it cannot be ruled out that consumers might experience difficulties in grasping the minor stylistic differences which may differentiate those marks.

49      In the third place, the graphic stylisation requires a detailed examination on the part of consumers, who do not adopt a particularly attentive approach when confronted with single-letter signs (judgment of 7 October 2014, *Tifosi Optics* v *OHIM — Tom Tailor (T)*, T‐531/12, not published, EU:T:2014:855, paragraph 62). In that regard, it must be borne in mind that the Court has already held that it is true that consumers are capable of perceiving differences between the stylisation of signs. However, the key point is how the signs at issue are normally perceived overall and not how the stylistic differences between the signs may be perceived in the event that a particularly meticulous consumer is in a position to examine the graphic stylisations and draw comparisons between them (judgment of 7 October 2014, *T*, T‐531/12, not published, EU:T:2014:855, paragraph 65).

50      In view of all of the foregoing, it must be held that the Board of Appeal erred in finding that the differences between the signs were sufficient to outweigh the elements in common. The differences highlighted by the Board of Appeal in paragraph 53 of the contested decision and by EUIPO in its written pleadings do not counteract the fact that there is, for a non-negligible part of the relevant public, a high degree of visual similarity between the marks at issue viewed as a whole.

–       The phonetic and conceptual similarity

51      From a phonetic and conceptual standpoint, the Board of Appeal found that the marks at issue were phonetically and conceptually identical, but only in the unlikely event that part of the relevant public perceived the contested sign as the graphic representation of a capital letter ‘D’, whereas, for the remaining public, the phonetic and conceptual comparison was not relevant or impossible.

52      The applicant submits that, since the mark applied for will be perceived by a significant part of the relevant public as a capital letter ‘D’, the signs at issue must be regarded as both phonetically and conceptually identical.

53      EUIPO maintains that, even if the marks under comparison were perceived as the same letter, that would not have a substantial impact on their phonetic and conceptual comparison. According to EUIPO, consumers are unlikely to refer orally to trade marks that are composed of a single letter, especially when, as in the present case, they are represented by a specific graphic form, at least so far as concerns the mark applied for. It also maintains that those marks, moreover, generally have no clear concept. It takes the view that, having regard to the relevant goods, the marks at issue would have no other meaning than that of simply referring to the capital letter ‘D’ in the alphabet.

54      As regards the phonetic comparison, it must be pointed out that, as both of the figurative signs at issue are capable of being perceived by a significant part of the relevant public as a capital letter ‘D’, they will be pronounced in the same way. Consequently, they may be regarded as phonetically identical, as the applicant has correctly stated.

55      As regards the conceptual comparison, since a significant part of the relevant public will perceive the mark applied for as a capital letter ‘D’, it must be pointed out that the signs at issue are conceptually identical, given that they refer to the same letter of the alphabet. The Court has already held that it cannot, in principle, be ruled out, that single letters of the alphabet might have their own conceptual content (judgment of 8 May 2012, *Mizuno* v *OHIM — Golfino (G)*, T‐101/11, not published, EU:T:2012:223, paragraphs 56 and 58).

–       Conclusion on the comparison of the signs

56      It follows from the foregoing that, contrary to what the Board of Appeal found in paragraphs 54 and 74 of the contested decision, for a non-negligible part of the relevant public, there are visual similarities between the marks at issue which outweigh the minor, purely stylistic differences. Furthermore, as has been pointed out in paragraphs 54 and 55 above, those marks are also phonetically and conceptually identical.

57      In any event, it must be stated, as was pointed out by the Board of Appeal and the intervener, that, in a sector such as the clothing sector, in which the goods covered by the marks in question are usually sold in self-service stores where consumers choose the product themselves and must therefore rely primarily on the image of the trade mark applied to the product, the visual similarity between the signs will as a general rule be more important than the phonetic and conceptual similarity (see, to that effect, judgment of 6 October 2004, *NLSPORT, NLJEANS, NLACTIVE and NLCollection*, T‐117/03 to T‐119/03 and T‐171/03, EU:T:2004:293, paragraph 49).

 The likelihood of confusion

58      It should be noted at the outset, in the first place, that a global assessment of the likelihood of confusion implies some interdependence between the factors taken into account and, in particular, between the similarity of the trade marks and that of the goods or services covered. Accordingly, a low degree of similarity between those goods or services may be offset by a high degree of similarity between the marks, and vice versa (judgments of 29 September 1998, *Canon*, C‐39/97, EU:C:1998:442, paragraph 17, and of 14 December 2006, *Mast-Jägermeister* v *OHIM — Licorera Zacapaneca (VENADO with frame and others)*, T‐81/03, T‐82/03 and T‐103/03, EU:T:2006:397, paragraph 74).

59      In the second place, the distinctive character of the earlier mark is one of the factors to be taken into account when assessing the likelihood of confusion (see judgment of 27 June 2013, *Repsol YPF* v *OHIM — Ajuntament de Roses (R)*, T‐89/12, not published, EU:T:2013:335, paragraph 45 and the case-law cited).

60      In the third place, a finding that the earlier mark has a weak distinctive character does not preclude a finding that there is a likelihood of confusion in the present case. Although the distinctive character of the earlier mark must be taken into account in assessing the likelihood of confusion, it is only one factor among others involved in that assessment. Consequently, even in a case involving an earlier mark with a weak distinctive character, there may be a likelihood of confusion on account, in particular, of a similarity between the signs and between the goods or services covered (see judgment of 13 December 2007, *Xentral* v *OHIM — Pages jaunes (PAGESJAUNES.COM)*, T‐134/06, EU:T:2007:387, paragraph 70 and the case-law cited).

61      In the fourth place, a letter is, in itself, capable of giving a trade mark distinctive character (see judgment of 8 May 2012, *G*, T‐101/11, not published, EU:T:2012:223, paragraph 50 and the case-law cited).

62      In the fifth place, the fact that signs composed of the same letter are, by way of assumption, phonetically and conceptually identical is in no way irrelevant in the examination of similarity for the purposes of assessing the likelihood of confusion. On the contrary, it is precisely because of that phonetic and conceptual identity that special consideration is to be given, in the context of registering a trade mark composed of a single letter for goods identical to, or presenting a high degree of similarity to, those covered by an earlier trade mark composed of the same letter, to ensuring that the mark applied for is sufficiently visually distinct from the earlier mark, in order to exclude any likelihood of confusion on the part of the relevant public (see judgment of 11 October 2016, *Perry Ellis International Group* v *EUIPO — CG (p)*, T‐350/15, not published, EU:T:2016:602, paragraph 57 and the case-law cited).

63      In the present case, as regards the distinctive character of the earlier mark, the Board of Appeal, after finding that the applicant had not claimed enhanced distinctiveness in respect of that mark, found that its inherent distinctiveness was rather low in relation to the goods concerned.

64      The applicant disputes such an assessment, submitting that the level of distinctiveness of the earlier mark must be considered to be normal as a result, in particular, of its stylisation.

65      As regards the global assessment of the likelihood of confusion, the Board of Appeal found that the signs had clear visual differences which outweighed the similarities. It also found that the fact that, for part of the relevant public, the signs might be perceived as a capital letter ‘D’ and that they might have the concept of that letter in common was not sufficient to create a likelihood of confusion. The Board of Appeal therefore concluded that, in spite of the principles of interdependence and imperfect recollection, there was no reason to assume that the relevant public in the European Union would be misled into thinking that the goods concerned, even if they were identical, could come from the same undertaking or, as the case might be, from undertakings that were economically linked. It took the view that that was the case, even taking into account the normal level of attention of the relevant public.

66      The applicant disputes the Board of Appeal’s arguments. It submits, in essence, that there are good arguments for concluding that there is a likelihood of confusion between the marks at issue for a significant part of the relevant public. In particular, the applicant takes the view that that likelihood of confusion is based on the identity of the goods, the average distinctiveness of the earlier mark and the fact that the main characteristics of the marks at issue are identical or at least similar.

67      In that regard, it must, first of all, be borne in mind that the Board of Appeal based its analysis of the likelihood of confusion on the assumption that the goods covered by the marks at issue are identical. Secondly, as has been stated in paragraph 56 above, in spite of certain minor differences between them, the signs at issue must as a whole be regarded as being characterised by a significant degree of visual similarity and as being phonetically and conceptually identical. Lastly, contrary to what the Board of Appeal stated, the visual differences which admittedly exist between the marks at issue are not sufficient to outweigh the similarities. The perception of such differences requires a degree of meticulousness and effort which seems unlikely to be employed by the average consumer in the light of the fact that that consumer only rarely has a chance to compare the various marks directly, but must rely on his imperfect recollection of them (see, to that effect, judgment of 10 May 2011, *G*, T‐187/10, not published, EU:T:2011:202, paragraph 71).

68      In those circumstances, it must be stated that, even if it is accepted that the earlier mark is weakly distinctive, as the Board of Appeal pointed out in paragraph 63 of the contested decision, it must be held that there is a likelihood of confusion between the signs at issue in respect of the goods concerned.

69      Furthermore, even if the likelihood of confusion were to exist only for part of the relevant public, namely that non-negligible part consisting of consumers likely to perceive the signs at issue as a capital letter ‘D’, and not for the part of the public which perceives the contested mark as a basic geometrical figure, such a finding would be sufficient, inasmuch as it is not necessary to establish that there is a likelihood of confusion for the whole of the relevant public (see, to that effect, judgment of 10 November 2011, *Esprit International* v *OHIM — Marc O’Polo International (Representation of a letter on a pocket)*, T‐22/10, not published, EU:T:2011:651, paragraph 120 and the case-law cited).

70      Consequently, contrary to what the Board of Appeal stated in paragraph 76 of the contested decision, it is conceivable that the relevant public will regard the goods covered by the marks at issue as coming from the same undertaking either because it confuses those marks or because it associates them. That is particularly possible if account is taken of the fact that it is common in the clothing and fashion sector, which is relevant in the present case, for the same mark to be configured in various different ways according to the goods which it designates or to particular periods in time (see, to that effect, judgment of 10 May 2011, *G*, T‐187/10, not published, EU:T:2011:202, paragraph 71 and the case-law cited).

71      The intervener’s argument, put forward at the hearing, that, by its opposition, the applicant seeks unfairly to monopolise the capital letter ‘D’, cannot cast doubt on that finding.

72      In that regard, it must be pointed out that the purpose of the opposition brought by the applicant, as the applicant itself stated at the hearing, is to prevent the mark applied from being registered as a trade mark which is likely to give rise to a likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark, in particular on account of its stylistic similarity. The purpose of the opposition is not, contrary to what the intervener claims, to prevent the mark applied for from being registered by reason of the fact that it represents a capital letter ‘D’ or to prevent all the other marks consisting of such a letter from being registered.

73      Furthermore, it must be pointed out that the reference to other trade marks including a capital letter ‘D’, such as the stylised capital letters ‘D’ registered by Walt Disney Company and by Gucci, D & G and Dior, is not relevant in the present case.

 Conclusions as to the outcome of the action

74      In view of all of the foregoing considerations, the applicant’s single plea in law must be upheld and the contested decision must be annulled, in accordance with the applicant’s first head of claim.

75      Furthermore, it must be pointed out that, as has been stated by EUIPO, the Board of Appeal did not compare the goods, taking as its basis the assumption that the goods concerned should be regarded as identical. In addition it did not, thereby following the Opposition Division’s approach, assess the proof of genuine use, which had been provided by the applicant at the intervener’s request (see paragraph 12 above).

76      The Board of Appeal must therefore assess those matters.

 Costs

77      Under Article 134(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court, the unsuccessful party is to be ordered to pay the costs if they have been applied for in the successful party’s pleadings.

78      In the present case, EUIPO and the intervener have been unsuccessful. Consequently, first, EUIPO must be ordered to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the applicant, in accordance with the form of order sought by the applicant. Secondly, since the intervener has been unsuccessful, it must bear its own costs.

On those grounds,

THE GENERAL COURT (Sixth Chamber)

hereby:

1)      Annuls the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 18 June 2015 (Case R 3291/2014-2);

2)      Orders EUIPO to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Diesel SpA;

3)      Orders Sprinter megacentros del deporte, SL to bear its own costs.

BerardisSpielmannCsehi

Delivered in open court in Luxembourg on 20 July 2017.

E. Coulon D. Gratsias

RegistrarPresident

---

[\*](#Footref*)      Language of the case: English.