alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

| 1. | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Corporation for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation. |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/ EUDIO GIL                                                 |   |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
| Eudio GilVice President, Treasurer andChief Financial Officer |   |   |
| Date: August 3, 2009                                          |   |   |

----
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

PATRICK HARRIS
, MERCURY AIRLINES, LLC, and

AER SPARTA CORP. Appellant s ,

v.

JAMES BEVAN
, Appellee.

No. 4D2023

- 0473

[ July 11, 2024 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Martin J. Bidwill , Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE18

- 27533

.

Michael Ellis and Samuel Alexander of Alexander Appellate Law

, P.A., DeLand, for appellant s

.

Peter J. Solnick of Solnick Law

, P.A., North Miami Beach, for appellee

.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed

.

G ROSS
, F ORST and A RTAU
, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
# C_2015127EN.01004202.xml

| 20.4.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 127/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.4.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 127/42

---

Action brought on 9 February 2015 — ZZ v Commission

(Case F-23/15)

(2015/C 127/60)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: C. Mourato, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

The annulment of the decision imposing a disciplinary penalty on the applicant consisting of a reprimand.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of 15 April 2014 of the appointing authority applying the disciplinary penalty of a reprimand to the applicant; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of 15 April 2014 of the appointing authority applying the disciplinary penalty of a reprimand to the applicant;

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings, pursuant to Article 87 of the Rules of Procedure of the Civil Service Tribunal. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings, pursuant to Article 87 of the Rules of Procedure of the Civil Service Tribunal.

---
(Reap. Dec. 9401)

#### The American International Products Corporation *v.*United States

Entry No. 840560 1/2, etc.

(Decided April 22, 1959)

*John D. Rocíe*for the plaintiff.

*George Goehr an Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Wilson, Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation entered into between counsel for the respective parties:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between counsel for the plaintiff and the Assistant Attorney General for the United States, subject to the approval of the Court, that the merchandise the subject of the above entitled appeals to reappraisement is properly dutiable on the basis of American Selling Price as defined in Section 402(g) Tariff Act of 1930 as amended and that the said American Selling Price was as follows for the export periods indicated.

> Item Export period

> Pas Sodium 1957 $2.10 per lb. less 1% net packed.

> Pas Sodium 1958 $1.90 per lb. less 1% net packed.

> Pas Acid 1957 $3.40 per lb. less 1% net packed.

> Pas Acid 1958 $3.40 per lb. less 1% net packed.

> Pas Calcium 1957 $3.75 per lb. less 1% net packed.

> Pas Calcium 1958 $3.10 per lb. less 1% net packed.

> *612IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the appeals be deemed submitted for decision on this stipulation.

On tbe agreed facts, I find American selling price, as that value is defined in section 402(g) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by section 8 of the Customs Administrative Act of 1938, to be the proper basis for determination of the value of the merchandise here in question, and that such value for each of the involved articles was as here-inabove set forth in the stipulation of submission.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
<PAGE>

                                                       SCHEDULE TO EXHIBIT 10.18


                         MORRISON KNUDSEN CORPORATION

                          INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENTS


               Name                         Date of Agreement
               ----                         -----------------
         David H. Batchelder                September 12, 1996
         Reed N. Brimhall                   April 19, 1999
         Anthony S. Cleberg                 May 5, 1997
         Frank S. Finlayson                 July 29, 1997
         Leo A. Giacometto                  September 20, 1999
         Stephen G. Hanks                   September 12, 1996
         Alvia L. Henderson                 September 12, 1996
         Leonard R. Judd                    September 12, 1996
         Roger J. Ludlam                    February 1, 1999
         Robert S. Miller, Jr.              September 12, 1996
         Dorn Parkinson                     September 12, 1996
         Richard D. Parry                   September 12, 1996
         Terry W. Payne                     September 12, 1996
         John D. Roach                      September 12, 1996
         Jonathan M. Robertson              September 12, 1996
         Lisa H. Ross                       September 12, 1996
         Ambrose L. Schwallie               August 6, 1999
         Craig G. Taylor                    April 10, 1997
         Dennis R. Washington               September 12, 1996
         Thomas H. Zarges                   September 12, 1996
Exhibit
32.2
 
 
 
 Certification
of CFO Pursuant to
 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350,
 As
Adopted Pursuant to
 Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of U.S. Energy Corp. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Robert Scott Lorimer,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:
 
 (1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 
 
 
 
 /s/  Robert
      Scott LorimerRobert
      Scott Lorimer,Chief
      Financial OfficerAugust
      8, 2008
 
 
 This
certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.
 
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
U.S. Energy Corp. and will be retained by U.S. Energy Corp. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 198 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 198

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas poverty can be seen as a deep, structural problem that implicates our 
        value system and our educational and economic institutions;
Whereas poverty may be defined as the lack of basic necessities of life such as 
        food, shelter, clothing, health care, education, security, and 
        opportunity;
Whereas policy initiatives addressing poverty have not kept pace with the needs 
        of millions of Americans;
Whereas many experts believe that the lack of an equitable distribution of 
        housing choices across the country leads to isolation and concentrated 
        poverty;
Whereas the number of Americans living in poverty has risen by over 5,000,000 
        since 2000;
Whereas there were 37 million Americans living in poverty in 2005;
Whereas the official poverty rate in 2005 was 12.6 percent;
Whereas 24.9 percent of African Americans, 21.8 percent of Hispanics, 25.3 
        percent of Native Americans, 10.9 percent of Asian Americans, and 8.3 
        percent of Whites lived in poverty in the United States in 2005;
Whereas in 2005 a family of 4 was considered poor under the U.S. Census Bureau's 
        official measure if the family's income was below $19,971;
Whereas the poverty rate for children 18 years and younger (17.6 percent) 
        remained higher than that of 18-24 year-olds (11.1 percent) and that of 
        people 65 and older (10.1 percent) in 2005; and
Whereas the number in poverty increased for people 65 and older by almost 
        400,000 since 2000: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of Congress that the United States should set a 
national goal of cutting poverty in half over the next 10 years.

            Passed the House of Representatives January 22, 2008.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
110th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                            H. CON. RES. 198

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

  Expressing the sense of Congress that the United States has a moral 
     responsibility to meet the needs of those persons, groups and 
   communities that are impoverished, disadvantaged or otherwise in 
                                poverty.
```
#### Glarden Importing Corp. et al. *v.*United States

No. 8031.

Entered at New Tort, N. T.

Entry No. 748674, etc.

(Decided August 6, 1951)

*Lane, Young ,£ Fox (William JS. Fox*of counsel) for the plaintiffs.

*David N. Fdelstem,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Lawrence, Judge:

It has been agreed between the parties hereto that the watch hands designated as item No. 605 and the issues involved in each of the appeals for reappraisement enumerated in schedule “A,” attached hereto and made a part hereof, are similar in all material *413respects to the merchandise and issues involved in *Larsen Importing Corp.*v. *United*States, 25 Cust. Ct. 366, Reap. Dec. 7855, and that the record in said case may be incorporated herein.

The parties have also agreed that on or about the date of exportation the merchandise here in controversy was freely offered for sale and sold for home consumption, and for exportation to the United States, to all purchasers in the principal markets of Switzerland, the country of exportation, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade at the unit invoice prices, plus the maj orations or increases as invoiced, less a quantity discount of 3 per centum, less a cash discount of 5 per centum, packed.

Upon the agreed facts, I find the foreign and export values, as those values are defined in section 402 (c) and (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Administrative Act of 1938 (19 U. S. C. § 1402 (c) and (d)), of the watch hands designated as item No. 605, to be the proper basis for determining the value of said merchandise and that such values are the unit invoice prices, plus the maj orations or increases as invoiced, less a quantity discount of 3 per centum, less a cash discount of 5 per centum, packed.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
EXHIBIT 32.2
                                                                    ------------


                         CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906
                                     OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Unico American
Corporation (the "Company") for the period ended March 31, 2005, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission as of the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Lester A. Aaron, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
    the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



                    /s/  Lester A. Aaron
                    --------------------
           Name:    Lester A. Aaron
           Title:   Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
           Date:    May 13, 2005




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Unico American Corporation, and
will be retained by Unico American Corporation, and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v TERRENCE B. LEWIS, Private E-1, U. S. Army, Appellant

9 USCMA 438, 26 CMR 218

No. 10,974

Decided July 3, 1958

*Major Edward Fenig*and *First Lieutenant Edwin E. Allen*were on the brief for Appellant, Accused.

*Lieutenant Colonel John G. Lee*and *First Lieutenant Avram G. Hammer*were on the brief for Appellee, United States.

*439Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:

The accused was found guilty by general court-martial convened at Tokyo, Honshu, Japan, of conspiracy to violate a lawful general regulation governing the purchase of post exchange items and of violating the same regulation, in contravention of Articles 81 and 92, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC §§ 881 and 892, respectively. The regulation in question was AFFE Circular 141, which deals with Army and Air Force exchange activities. In the case of United States v Curtin, 9 USCMA 427, 26 CMR 207, we held that paragraph 9f of the Circular was intended to prescribe prohibitions and restrictions on the use that may be made of exchange purchases by individual purchasers. Consequently, the accused’s contention that the specifications failed to allege offenses is without merit.

The second assigned error raises the question of whether the law-officer erred in failing to instruct the court-martial that before it could convict the accused of violating the Circular, it must first find that he had knowledge of its existence. This question has also been resolved adversely to the accused. In United States v Stone, 9 USCMA 191, 25 CMR 453, we held that AFFE is a “major command” directly under the Department of the Army so that knowledge of its regulations may be presumed. See also United States v Statham, 9 USCMA 200, 25 CMR 462; United States v Silva, 9 USCMA 420, 26 CMR 200; and United States v Curtin, supra. Therefore, there was no duty upon the law officer to instruct on the element of knowledge. Finding no error in the record, the decision of the board of review is hereby affirmed.
Exhibit
      31.1




I,
      Walker
      R. Stapleton, certify that:




1.  I
      have
      reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of SonomaWest Holdings,
      Inc.;




2.  Based
      on
      my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
      fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
      in
      light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
      with respect to the period covered by this report;




3.  Based
      on
      my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
      in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
      results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
      periods presented in this report;




4.  The
      registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing
      and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange
      Act
      Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:




(a)  Designed
      such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
      and
      procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
      information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
      is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
      period in which this report is being prepared;




(b)  Evaluated
      the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and
      presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
      disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
      this
      report based on such evaluation;




(c)  Disclosed
      in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial
      reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter
      that
      has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
      registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and




5.  The
      registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
      recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
      registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
      directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):




(a)  All
      significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
      of
      internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
      adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
      report financial information; and




(b)  Any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
      who
      have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial
      reporting.




Date:
      May
      15, 2007









/s/
      Walker R. Stapleton


Walker
      R.
      Stapleton, President, Chief


Executive
      Officer and Chief Financial Officer
# C_2016402EN.01004401.xml

| 31.10.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 402/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.10.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 402/44

---

Judgment of the General Court of 15 September 2016 — JT International v EUIPO — Habanos (PUSH)

(Case T-633/15) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU word mark PUSH - Earlier Benelux and national word and figurative marks PUNCH - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Identity of the goods - Similarity of the signs - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2016/C 402/51)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: JT International SA (Geneva, Switzerland) (represented by: S. Malynicz QC and K.E. Gilbert and J. Gilbert, Solicitors)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: S. Bonne, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Corporación Habanos, SA (Havana, Cuba) (represented by: M. Escudero Pérez, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 10 August 2015 (Case R 3046/2014-5), relating to opposition proceedings between Corporación Habanos and JT International

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders JT International SA to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) and by Corporación Habanos, SA. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders JT International SA to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) and by Corporación Habanos, SA.

---

(1)  OJ C 27, 25.1.2016.

1

---
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Consumers Financial
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2004,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Jack I. Ehrenhaus, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
               of 1934; and

         (2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
               all material respects, the financial condition and results of
               the operation of the Company.

/s/ Jack I Ehrenahus
-------------------------------------
Jack I. Ehrenhaus
Chief Financial Officer
January 7, 2005


                                       22
Exhibit 32.2

# Certification

# Pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,
Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), the undersigned officer of SonomaWest
Holdings, Inc., a California corporation (the Company), does hereby
certify that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended March 31, 2004 (the Form 10-Q) of the Company fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: May 14, 2004

| |  | By: /s/   Thomas R. Eakin
Thomas R. EakinChief Financial Officer
| |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to SonomaWest Holdings, Inc. and will
be retained by SonomaWest Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.