alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2017369EN.01000902.xml

| 30.10.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 369/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.10.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 369/9

---

Judgment of the General Court of 14 September 2017 — Contact Software v Commission

(Case T-751/15) (1)

1

((Competition - Abuse of a dominant position - Markets for computer-aided design software and for interface information about that software - Decision to reject a complaint - Relevant market - Manifest error of assessment - No EU interest))

(2017/C 369/12)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Contact Software GmbH (Bremen, Germany) (represented by: J.-M. Schultze, S. Pautke and C. Ehlenz, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: C. Vollrath, I. Zaloguin and L. Wildpanner, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Intervener in support of the defendant: Dassault systèmes (Vélizy-Villacoublay, France) (represented by: R. Snelders, lawyer, and J. Messent, Barrister)

Intervener in support of the defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application based on Article 263 TFEU and seeking the partial annulment of Commission Decision C(2015) 7006 final of 9 October 2015 rejecting the complaint lodged by the applicant regarding infringements of Article 102 TFEU allegedly committed by Dassault systèmes and Parametric Technology Corp. on certain markets for computer-aided design software and certain markets for interface information about that software (Case COMP/39846 — Contact/Dassault & Parametric).

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Contact Software GmbH to bear its own costs and to pay the costs of the European Commission; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Contact Software GmbH to bear its own costs and to pay the costs of the European Commission;

| 3. | Orders Dassault systèmes to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Dassault systèmes to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 68, 22.2.2016.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997             DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         163,175                 271,692
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,981,415               3,741,448
<PP&E>                                               0                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,981,415               3,741,448
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           36,985                  92,700
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,944,430               3,648,748
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,981,415               3,741,448
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,438                   1,504
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                25,765                  25,285
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                295,682                 250,295
<INCOME-TAX>                                   295,682                 250,295
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   295,682                 250,295
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0
        

</TABLE>
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsOperational modules for space station constructionIdentification of an effective space construction concept is a current objective of NASA studies. One concept, described in this memorandum, consists of repetitive use of operational modules, which minimizes on-orbit stay time for the shuttle. A space station constructed of operational modules may benefit from fabrication and system checkout in ground-based facilities, and since the modules are the primary structure of the space station, a minimum of additional structure, and trips and on-orbit stay time of the shuttle are required.Document ID19840013540Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsJackson, L. R.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Moses, P. L.*(Kentron International, Inc. Hampton, VA, United States)*Scotti, S. J.*(Kentron International, Inc.)*Blosser, M. L.*(NASA Langley Research Center)*Date AcquiredSeptember 4, 2013Publication DateApril 1, 1984Subject CategorySpacecraft Design, Testing And PerformanceReport/Patent NumberNASA-TM-85772NAS 1.15:85772Accession Number84N21608Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 506-53-43Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19840013540.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

 

CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906

OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

 

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q ofUnico American Corporation (the "Company") for the period ended June 30, 2012, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Cary L. Cheldin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that to the best of my knowledge:

 

1.      the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

 

      /s/ Cary L. Cheldin

 

Name:   Cary L. Cheldin

Title:      Chairman of the Board, Presidentand Chief Executive Officer

Date:     August10, 2012

 

 

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906,or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronicversion of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Unico American Corporation, and

will be retained by Unico American Corporation, and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### State *versus*Boyd C. Leavitt & *al.*

An indictment for malicious mischief will not necessarily be defeated, merely because the acts proved might have supported a charge for larceny.

Exceptions from the District Court, Hathaway, J. presiding. Indictment under the thirteenth section of the one hun*184dred sixty-second chapter of the Revised Statutes, entitled “ Of malicious mischief,” &c., for wilfully and maliciously destroying certain shop tools, the property of one Dexter. There was evidence tending to show that the defendants, in the night time, broke open the shop, and thew the tools into the river. The defendants’ counsel contended that the acts, if proved, constituted a *larceny,*and that, therefore, they could not support an indictment for *malicious mischief,*and requested the Judge so to instruct the jury. That request was denied ; the verdict was for the *State;*and the defendants excepted.

The case was submitted by *Waterhouse,*County Attorney, for the State, and by *Knowles,*for the defendants, without argument.

Shepley, C. J.,

orally.—The request to the Judge assumed that, if certain acts would support a charge for *larceny,*they could not support an indictment for *malicious mischief.*But there is no such principle of law. This court has recently decided that-acts, which might have supported an indictment for arson, would support a charge for malicious mischief. The instruction requested was properly refused.

*Exceptions overruled.*
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 146 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 146

 Expressing the sense of Congress that the Secretary of Transportation 
 may not grant authority to Mexico-domiciled motor carriers to operate 
    beyond the commercial zones of the United States-Mexico border.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 9, 2007

 Mr. Goode (for himself and Mr. Jones of North Carolina) submitted the 
following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 
                   Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing the sense of Congress that the Secretary of Transportation 
 may not grant authority to Mexico-domiciled motor carriers to operate 
    beyond the commercial zones of the United States-Mexico border.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),  
That it is the sense of Congress that the Secretary of Transportation 
may not grant authority to Mexico-domiciled motor carriers to operate 
beyond the commercial zones of the United States-Mexico border.
                                 <all>
```
No. 62060.

#### J. M. Rodgers Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 315653-K (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with rule 5 (b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
Exhibit 15.1



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTING FIRM



We consent to the incorporation
by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-214817), of our report dated March 22, 2017, with
respect to the consolidated financial statements of Cellect Biotechnology Ltd. (formerly: Cellect Biomed Ltd.), which appear in
this Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2016.





|                 | /s/ Kost Forer Gabbay & Kasierer
|---------------- | --------------------------------
|Tel Aviv, Israel | KOST FORER GABBAY & KASIERER    
|March 23, 2017   | A member of Ernst & Young Global
# C_2015178EN.01002801.xml

| 1.6.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 178/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.6.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 178/28

---

Action brought on 9 March 2015 — ZZ and Others v CEPOL

(Case F-41/15)

(2015/C 178/31)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicants: ZZ and Others

Applicants:

Defendant: European Police College (CEPOL)

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decisions of the European Police College (CEPOL) leading the applicants either to resign from their posts at CEPOL or to move from London to Budapest at a financial loss, and application for damages for material and non-material harm allegedly caused thereby.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of CEPOL No 17/2014/DIR dated 23 May 2014, providing for the relocation of CEPOL in Budapest, Hungary, as from 1 October 2014 and informing the applicants that ‘Non-compliance with this instruction will be considered as resignation with the effect of 30 September 2014’; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of CEPOL No 17/2014/DIR dated 23 May 2014, providing for the relocation of CEPOL in Budapest, Hungary, as from 1 October 2014 and informing the applicants that ‘Non-compliance with this instruction will be considered as resignation with the effect of 30 September 2014’;

o

| — | annul, also, and so far as necessary, CEPOL’s decisions dated 28 November 2014, rejecting the applicants’ complaints lodged between 8 and 21 August 2014 against the aforementioned decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul, also, and so far as necessary, CEPOL’s decisions dated 28 November 2014, rejecting the applicants’ complaints lodged between 8 and 21 August 2014 against the aforementioned decision;

| — | annul also, and so far as necessary, CEPOL’s decisions of 22 December 2014 by which CEPOL ‘accepted’ the resignation of two of the applicants; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul also, and so far as necessary, CEPOL’s decisions of 22 December 2014 by which CEPOL ‘accepted’ the resignation of two of the applicants;

| — | compensate the material prejudice suffered by the applicants; |
| --- | --- |

—

compensate the material prejudice suffered by the applicants;

| — | compensate the moral prejudice suffered by the applicants; |
| --- | --- |

—

compensate the moral prejudice suffered by the applicants;

| — | order CEPOL to pay all the costs incurred by the applicants for the present appeal. |
| --- | --- |

—

order CEPOL to pay all the costs incurred by the applicants for the present appeal.

---
# Title

# 2013_2015_Summary

# Total, Dissolved Nutrients

# Chlorophyll

# BOD

# DOC

# TPCN
#### Chas. H. Asche & Co., Inc. *v.*United States

No. 7412.

Invoice dated Nottingham, England, July 1945.

Certified July 1945.

Entered at New York, N. Y., August 13, 1945.

Entry No. 705864.

(Decided October 21, 1947)

*Strauss & Hedges (Hadley S. King*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Tilson, Judge:

This appeal involves the proper dutiable values of certain cotton laces imported from England. In submitting the appeal for decision counsel for the respective parties have agreed that the issues involved herein are the same in all material respects as those involved in *United States*v. *Pitcairn,*C. A. D. 334, and the record therein has been admitted in evidence in this case.

On the facts agreed upon and following the authority cited, I find and hold the proper dutiable export values of the merchandise covered by this appeal to be the values found by the appraiser, less any amount added to cover the so-called British purchase tax. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
# C_2016410EN.01003402.xml

| 7.11.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 410/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.11.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 410/34

---

Order of the General Court of 14 September 2016 — Drex Technologies v Council

(Case T-467/15) (1)

1

(2016/C 410/53)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 337, 12.10.2015.

1

---
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v JAMES L. HENRY, Private E-2, U. S. Army, Appellant

7 USCMA 663, 23 CMR 127

*664No. 9465

Decided March 15, 1957

*Major Edward Fenig*was on the brief for Appellant, Accused.

*Lieutenant Colonel Thomas J. Neioton, First Lieutenant Arnold I. Burns,*and *First Lieutenant Robert L. Spatz,*were on the brief for Appellee, United States.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

A board of review affirmed the accused’s conviction for desertion, in violation of Article of War 58, 10 USC (1946 ed) § 1530 (now Article 85, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 885). We granted review.

To show the initiation of the accused’s absence, the prosecution introduced an extract copy of a morning report entry from the records of his former organization. The entry does not contain the signature of the authenticating officer as required by the then existing regulations. See All 345-400, paragraph 6, May 7, 1943. Instead, in the usual place for the signature appear the initials “WHW.” In United States v Parlier, 1 USCMA 433, 437, 4 CMR 25, we held that the omission of the signature as required by the regulations made the entry inadmissible in evidence. Although defense counsel failed to object to the admission of the extract, his failure did not make the entry competent evidence of the inception of the accused’s absence. United States v Smith, 3 USCMA 15, 11 CMR 15; United States v Carter, 1 USCMA 108, 2 CMR 14. See also United States v Smith, 2 USCMA 121, 6 CMR 121.

The Government argues, however, that the entries on prosecution exhibit 2, which were made on-June 17, 1956, are competent to establish the inception of the accused’s absence. Under the applicable regulations, the nature of the comments, and the date of the entry, we find no merit in this contention.

The decision of the board of review is reversed. The findings of guilty and the sentence are set aside. A rehearing may be ordered.
August 20, 1940

No. 44216.

Suit 4284.

#### *H. E. Warner, Trustee, American Mail Line, Ltd.*v. *United States.*

affirmed. C. A. D. 136.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 268 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 268

  Expressing the sense of Congress that a commemorative postage stamp 
    should be issued to promote public awareness of, and additional 
                   research relating to, scleroderma.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            December 6, 2007

  Mr. Lynch submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
      referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
  Expressing the sense of Congress that a commemorative postage stamp 
    should be issued to promote public awareness of, and additional 
                   research relating to, scleroderma.

Whereas an estimated 300,000 Americans have scleroderma, a chronic autoimmune 
        disease that affects the skin, joints, and often times the internal 
        organs, including the heart, kidneys, lungs, and gastrointestinal tract;
Whereas scleroderma is difficult to diagnose due to the similarity of its 
        symptoms to those of other autoimmune diseases;
Whereas like other autoimmune diseases, scleroderma affects primarily women, 
        ages 25 to 55, though men and children are also affected;
Whereas the cause of scleroderma is unknown and scleroderma has no known cure;
Whereas Federal funding for scleroderma research has remained level at only 
        approximately $11,000,000 for the past 4 fiscal years; and
Whereas the Federal government, public and private organizations, health care 
        providers, and the medical community are striving to work together more 
        closely in order to improve the quality of life of people affected by 
        scleroderma: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of Congress that--
            (1) the United States Postal Service should issue a 
        commemorative postage stamp to promote public awareness of, and 
        additional research relating to, scleroderma; and
            (2) the Citizens' Stamp Advisory Committee of the United 
        States Postal Service should recommend to the Postmaster 
        General that such a stamp be issued.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 35.13



|     |  |                                                                                                             
|---- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|LOGO |  | Commercial Mortgage Servicing D1050-084,
8th Floor 401 South Tryon Street
Charlotte, NC 28202 1-800-326-1334

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of October 1, 2015, by and among WELLS FARGO COMMERCIAL
MORTGAGE SECURITIES, INC., as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as General Master Servicer, LNR PARTNERS, LLC, as General Special Servicer, NATIONAL COOPERATIVE BANK, N.A., as NCB Master Servicer, NATIONAL COOPERATIVE BANK, N.A., as
NCB Special Servicer, MIDLAND LOAN SERVICES, A DIVISION OF PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as One Court Square Special Servicer, PENTALPHA SURVEILLANCE LLC, as Trust Advisor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator, as
Tax Administrator and as Custodian and WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2015-NXS3 (the Agreement). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise
defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

Pursuant to Section 11.12 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive
Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities of the General Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016 (the Reporting Period), and of its performance per the Agreement during
such period has been made under my supervision, and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the General Master Servicer, has fulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of
February 2017.



|                        
|------------------------
|LOGO                    
|Daniel Bober            
|Executive Vice President
|Wells Fargo Bank        



|                       |  |     
|---------------------- |  | ----
|Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |  | LOGO