From: Rahul Pendse <RPendse@trinityconsultants.com>

Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2014 10:19 AM

To: Krivo, Stan

Cc: Land, Eva; Carlson, Sara; Kathryn Maness

(Kathryn.Maness@anadarko.com)

Subject: RE: Anadarko

- BlackHawk/BlackHornet

Hello Stan,

Sara Carlson of Anadarko and I would like to discuss the comments and the preliminary responses with

you. Please advise whether you have availability in the afternoon tomorrow (1/23). Please suggest

alternate time if tomorrow afternoon does not work for yo u. Thanks!

................................................................................................................ Rahul Pendse

Managing Consultant

Trinity Consultants

– Baton Rouge

301 Main Street, Suite 900 | Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70825

Office: 225

- 346

- 4003 | Mobile: 714

- 454

- 0518

Email: rpendse@trinityconsultants.com

From: Krivo, Stan [ mailto:Krivo.Stanley@epa.gov ]

Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2014 2:44 PM

To: Rahul Pendse

Cc: Land, Eva

Subject: RE: Anad arko

- BlackHawk/BlackHornet

Rahul,

We keep trying to catch each other concerning the remaining air quality impact concerns from the

comments/clarification requests provided in the incompleteness letter for the BlackHawk and

BlackHornet PSD permit appli cations. Similar to the Bob Douglas application, the provided responses to

our incompleteness comments did not resolve all items.

To facilitate our discussion and completing the records for these applications, the following provides

the remaining commen ts not resolved by Anadarko’s 12 November 2013 response.

19. Provide reason the impact assessment using a single supply boat is appropriate given simultaneous

operation of multiple supply boats is planned.

The total fuel limit provided for all utilize d supply boats is provided as justification. The emissions from

the modeled supply boat was indicated to be based on the proposed fuel limit so the impact modeling

properly represents the impacts from one or more supply boat operations.

The fuel limit fo r the all supply boats is based on 24

- hour and annual periods. Considering the short

term standards (e.g. 1

- hour NAAQS), the only way the modeled single supply boat would represent theworst

- case supply boat impact would be if the fuel limit included an hourly value and the emissions used

in the modeling were based on the hourly fuel limit consumed by the single boat.

The application indicates the shortest period for supply boat fuel limit was 24

- hours. Multiple supply

boats could operate under the 24

- h our fuel limit, although not for the full 24

- hours period, producing

larger hourly emissions and greater impacts than that associated with a single boat.

21. Ozone data used in CALPUFF modeling analyses

The use of ozone data representative of the modeling domain and/or the PSD Class I area is

appropriate. Data acquired at Sumatra, FL would be appropriate for St. Marks and Bradwell Bay Class I

impact analyses. The appropriateness for application at the Breton PSD Class I area has not been

addressed.

22. Screening ambient concentration levels for soils and vegetation.

The EPA referenced screening ambient concentration levels were not addressed in the response. Rather

the response reiterated the fact that the provided qualita tive conclusion was based on the Secondary

NAAQS. Comparison of the screening levels in “A Screening Procedure for Impacts of Air Pollution

Sources on Plants, Soils, and Animals” were not provided.

24. Confirm the Breeze software used the unmodified vers ions of the regulatory CALPUFF modeling

system.

The response indicates the approved versions of the CALPUFF modeling system were

used. Confirmation is needed that the BREEZE modeling system uses for this analysis incorporates the

unmodified regulatory versions of CALMET, CALPUFF, and CALPOST.

I suggest we discuss these items and the needed additional information before you prepare any

response.

Thanks...sjk

From: Rahul Pendse [ mailto:RPend se@trinityconsultants.com ]

Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2014 11:08 AM

To: Krivo, Stan

Cc: Land, Eva; Carlson, Sara; Kathryn Maness ( Kathryn.Maness@anadarko.com )

Subject: Anadarko

- BlackHawk/BlackHornet

Hello Stan,

Eva Land informed me that you have a few follow up questions related to the BlackHawk

- BlackHornet

incompleteness letter responses submitted by Anadarko and Trinity. Please let me know if you have

availability tomorrow or next week to discuss y our questions. Thanks for your help.

................................................................................................................ Rahul Pendse

Managing ConsultantTrinity Consultants

– Baton Rouge

301 Main Street, Suite 900 | Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70825

Office: 225

- 346

- 4003 | Mobile: 714

- 454

- 05 18

Email: rpendse@trinityconsultants.com

_________________________________________________________________________

The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to

which it i s addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged

material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or

taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or

entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you

Received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material

from any computer.

_________________________________________________________________________

____________________ _____________________________________________________

The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to

which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged

material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or oth er use of, or

taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or

entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you

Received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material

from any computer.

___________ ______________________________________________________________