alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

House Calendar No. 222 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 309 

[Report No. 110–656] 

Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the District of Columbia 

Special Olympics Law Enforcement Torch Run. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 4, 2008 

Ms. NORTON (for herself, Mr. GRAVES, Mr. HOYER, Mr. CUMMINGS, Mr. VAN

HOLLEN, Mr. WYNN, Mr. TOM DAVIS of Virginia, Mr. MORAN of Virginia, and Mr. WOLF) submitted the following concurrent resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

MAY 19, 2008 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the District 

of Columbia Special Olympics Law Enforcement Torch Run. 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
2 

•HCON 309 RH 

1 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF USE OF CAPITOL 

2 GROUNDS FOR D.C. SPECIAL OLYMPICS LAW 

3 ENFORCEMENT TORCH RUN. 

4 On June 6, 2008, or on such other date as the Speak5 er of the House of Representatives and the Committee on 

6 Rules and Administration of the Senate may jointly des7 ignate, the 2008 District of Columbia Special Olympics 

8 Law Enforcement Torch Run (in this resolution referred 

9 to as the ‘‘event’’) may be run through the Capitol 

10 Grounds as part of the journey of the Special Olympics 

11 torch to the District of Columbia Special Olympics sum12 mer games. 

13 SEC. 2. RESPONSIBILITY OF CAPITOL POLICE BOARD. 

14 The Capitol Police Board shall take such actions as 

15 may be necessary to carry out the event. 

16 SEC. 3. CONDITIONS RELATING TO PHYSICAL PREPARA17 TIONS. 

18 The Architect of the Capitol may prescribe conditions 

19 for physical preparations for the event. 

20 SEC. 4. ENFORCEMENT OF RESTRICTIONS. 

21 The Capitol Police Board shall provide for enforce22 ment of the restrictions contained in section 5104(c) of 

23 title 40, United States Code, concerning sales, advertise24 ments, displays, and solicitations on the Capitol Grounds, 

25 as well as other restrictions applicable to the Capitol 

26 Grounds, in connection with the event. 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS

hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
House Calendar No. 222 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 309 

[Report No. 110

–656] 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the 

forcement Torch Run. District of Columbia Special Olympics Law EnMAY 19, 2008 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-7745

RICKY MILLER,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

RONALD J. ANGELONE, Director of the Virginia

Department of Corrections,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District

Judge. (CA-00-906-2)

Submitted: April 18, 2002 Decided: April 25, 2002

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ricky Miller, Appellant Pro Se. Linwood Theodore Wells, Jr.,

Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Ricky Miller appeals the district court’s order denying relief

on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.

2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the

district court. See Miller v. Angelone, No. CA-00-906-2 (E.D. Va.

July 9, 2001). We deny Miller’s motion for counsel. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
# C_2016454EN.01002601.xml

| 5.12.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 454/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.12.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 454/26

---

Order of the General Court of 11 October 2016 — Spliethoff’s Bevrachtingskantoor v Commission

(Case T-564/15) (1)

((Actions for annulment - Financial assistance in the field of Connecting Europe Facility - Act not open to challenge - Preparatory act - Inadmissibility))

(2016/C 454/46)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Spliethoff’s Bevrachtingskantoor BV (Amsterdam, Netherlands) (represented by: P. Glazener, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Hottiaux and J. Samnadda, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application pursuant to Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of the decision allegedly contained in the email of the Innovation and Networks Executive Agency (INEA) of 17 July 2015, relating to the proposal submitted by the applicant in response to the call for proposals launched under the Connecting Europe Facility on the basis of the Multi-Annual Work Programme adopted in 2014 pursuant to Commission Implementing Decision C(2014) 1921 of 26 March 2014 establishing the 2014 Multi-Annual Work Programme for financial assistance in the field of Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) — Transport sector for the period 2014-2020.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

| 2. | Spliethoff’s Bevrachtingskantoor BV is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Spliethoff’s Bevrachtingskantoor BV is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 398, 30.11.2015.

---
No. 39070.

#### Protests 935734-G, etc., of P. Pastene & Co., Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Keeps, J.

On the authority of *Locatelli*v. *United States*(T. D. 48284) the protests were sustained.
EX-31Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications.

 

 

I,Anthony Sfarra, certify that:

 

1.I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D requiredto be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of theWells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Trust 2016-C33 (the "Exchange Act periodicreports");

 

2.Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, donot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other informationrequired to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this reportis included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4.Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in thisreport under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in theExchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligationsunder the servicing agreements in all material respects; and

 

5.All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria forasset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment ofcompliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to beincluded in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB andExchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to thisreport, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances ofnoncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report onForm 10-K.

 

Ingiving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on informationprovided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:

 

NationalCooperative Bank, N.A., as NCB Master Servicer, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC,as Special Servicer, National Cooperative Bank, N.A., as NCB Special Servicer,Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee, Park Bridge Lender ServicesLLC, as Operating Advisor, CoreLogic Commercial Real Estate Services, Inc., asServicing Function Participant, National Tax Search, LLC, as Servicing FunctionParticipant, Trimont Real Estate Advisors, LLC, as Special Servicer for the 225Liberty Street Mortgage Loan, Wilmington Trust, National Association, asTrustee for the 225 Liberty Street Mortgage Loan, Citibank, N.A., asCertificate Administrator for the 225 Liberty Street Mortgage Loan, Citibank,N.A., as Custodian for the 225 Liberty Street Mortgage Loan, CoreLogicCommercial Real Estate Services, Inc., as Servicing Function Participant forthe 225 Liberty Street Mortgage Loan, and National Tax Search, LLC, as ServicingFunction Participant for the 225 Liberty Street Mortgage Loan.

 

 

 

Dated:November 1, 2019

 

 

/s/Anthony Sfarra

 

President

(senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
No. 44247.

#### Protests 834451-G, etc., of Butler Bros. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel Rockingham-ware similar to that the subject of *Butler*v. *United States*(4 Cust. Ct. 120, C. D. 303) was held dutiable at 25 percent under paragraph 210 as claimed. Tennis rackets of the same character as those passed upon in *May*v. *United States*(T. D. 47760) and *Woolworth v. United States*(T. D. 48573) were -held dutiable at 30 percent under paragraph 1302 as claimed.
Before the Third Division,

July 21, 1938

No. 39056.

#### Protests 933930-G, etc., of W. A. Taylor & Co. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

The protests were submitted without the introduction of evidence in support of the claims made. On the records presented the protests were overruled.
### OMNI A**IR INTERNA TIONA** **L**

**P.O. BOX 582527**  **TULSA, OK 74158**  **918 -** **836 -** **5393**  **FAX: 918 -** **831 -** **3098** 04 November 2013 U.S. Department of Transportation Docket Operations , M
-30 West Building Ground Floor Room W1 2

- 140 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE. Washington, DC 20590. Ladies/Gentlemen: In accordance with the Code of Federal Regulations, 14 CFR § 11.25, Omni Air International is petitioning the Administrator for an extension of Exemption No. 10041

. This exemption will expired on March 31, 201 4 Exemption 10041 provides relief, under certain conditions and limitations, from 14 CFR § 121.613, 121.61 9(a) and 121.625 to the extent necessary to: (1) dispatch an airplane, under IFR, to a destination airport; and (2) list an alternate airport for that destination airport when the Aerodrome Forecast (TAF) for either one or both of those airports indicates by the use of conditional language such as “BECMG”, “PROB” or “TEMPO”, in the TAF that the weather could be below authorized weather mi nim um s at the time of arrival. Dispatch under these circumstances is permitted if the information contained in the ma in body of the TAF used by the certificate holder’s dispatch center shows, for each flight to be dispatched, that the weather at the destination airport and alternate airport listed in the dispatch release will be at or above authorized weather minimums at the tim e of arrival. This exemption has been used to the benefit of the traveling public for many years, with no known com prom ise of safety. With regard to public interest and equivalent levels of safety, the circumstances that warranted the initial grant of exemption continue to exist. The renewal of this exemption is not a controversial issue. For this reason, and the reasons stated above, Omni Air International requests that a finding of good cause be made for waiving publication in the Federal Register. Granting the request for relief will set no precedents. The existence of the exemption is well known and widely accepted. If any further information is required, please call me at (918) 831

-3067.
Very truly yours,

Robert E. Zeng Director of Operations Om ni Air International
Exhibit 23.3

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

   

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-214679) pertaining to the Transitional Stock Adjustment Plan and 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan of Liberty Expedia Holdings, Inc. of our report dated February 10, 2016, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Expedia, Inc., included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Liberty Expedia Holdings, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2017.  

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

 

Seattle, Washington 

February 8, 2018 

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 22 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 22

  Expressing the sense of Congress that the President should provide 
notice of withdrawal of the United States from the North American Free 
                        Trade Agreement (NAFTA).

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 10, 2007

 Mr. Goode (for himself and Mr. Jones of North Carolina) submitted the 
following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
  Expressing the sense of Congress that the President should provide 
notice of withdrawal of the United States from the North American Free 
                        Trade Agreement (NAFTA).

Whereas, according to the Department of Commerce, United States trade deficits 
        with Canada and Mexico have significantly widened since the 
        implementation of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA);
Whereas, according to the Department of Labor, 1,800,000 workers have applied 
        for trade adjustment assistance as a result of jobs lost because of 
        NAFTA;
Whereas future unrestricted foreign trucking into the United States can pose a 
        safety hazard due to inadequate maintenance and inspection, and can act 
        collaterally as a conduit for the entry into the United States of 
        illegal drugs and terrorist activities; and
Whereas the economic and physical security of the United States is impaired by 
        the potential loss of control of its borders attendant to the full 
        operation of NAFTA: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),  
That it is the sense of Congress that the President should provide 
written notice of withdrawal of the United States from the North 
American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) in accordance with Article 2205 
of the Agreement.
                                 <all>
```
# Appendix O

Federal Land Manager ConsultationAppendix O

Federal Land Manager Consultation

40 CFR 51.308(i)(2) requires the State to pr ovide each FLM with an opportunity for consultation, in person and at least 60 da ys prior to holding a public hearing on a SIP

revision. The consultation must include th e opportunity for the FLM to discuss their:

• assessment of visibility impa irment in the Class I area

• recommendations on the development of the reasonable progress goal and on the development and implementation of strategi es to address visibility impairment

Georgia EPD provided the FLMs (USFS, FW S, and NPS) with opportunities for consultation by way of packages mailed on December 18, 2008, and received by the agencies on December 22, 2008. Each package included a cover letter and a copy of the draft prehearing SIP on compact disk (CD).

A face-to-face meeting was held with USFS personnel on January 14, 2009, at their offices in Gainesville, Georgia. USFS’ wr itten comments on the SIP were received by Georgia EPD on March 2, 2009 (see Subappendix O .1). A teleconference was held on January 22, 2009, with FWS personnel in their offices at Lakewood, Colorado. By prior agreement, the FWS and NPS submitted their comments jointly. These were received by EPD on February 17, 2009 (see Subappendix O.2) . EPD’s responses to the comments from the FLMs are presented in Subappendix O.3.
# C_2017144EN.01003402.xml

| 8.5.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 144/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.5.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 144/34

---

Judgment of the General Court of 14 March 2017 — IR v EUIPO — Pirelli Tyre (popchrono)

(Case T-132/15) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Revocation proceedings - EU word mark popchrono - Absence of genuine use of a trade mark - Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2017/C 144/45)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: IR (represented by: C. de Marguerye, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented initially by S. Palmero Cabezas, and subsequently by D. Gája, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Pirelli Tyre SpA (Milan, Italy) (represented by: T. Malte Müller and F. Togo, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 13 February 2015 (Case R 217/2014-5), relating to revocation proceedings between Pirelli Tyre and Mr IR.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Mr IR to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr IR to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 311, 21.9.2015.

1

---
Exhibit 32.1


                          CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
                          CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                          PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

      In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K
      of Big Time Acquisition,Inc. for the fiscal year ended August 31,
      2011, I, Scot A. Scheer, Chief Executive Officer(Principal
      Executive Officer)and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer
      of Big Time Acquisition,Inc. hereby certify as of the date hereof
      pursuant to Title 18 U.S.C., Chapter 63, Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to
      the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

           1.  Such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending
               August 31, 2011 fully complies with the requirements
               of section 13(a) or 15(d)as applicable of the Securities
               Exchange Act of 1934; and

           2.  The information contained in such Annual Report on Form
               10-K for the year ended August 31, 2011 fairly represents
               in all material respects, the financial condition and results
               of operations of Big Time Acquisition, Inc.

     Dated:  December 8, 2011



     Big Time Acquisition, Inc.

     By: /s/ Scot A. Scheer
        ----------------------------
        Chief Executive Officer
       (Principal Executive Officer
        and Principal Financial and
        Accounting Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 10Q FOR
THE QUARTER ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMTENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                         225,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,364,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                    45,000
<INVENTORY>                                  7,469,000<F1>
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            10,379,000
<PP&E>                                      16,931,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               9,853,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              17,457,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,229,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     3,971,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,581,000<F2>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                17,457,000
<SALES>                                     13,251,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            13,594,000
<CGS>                                       11,927,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               11,927,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             169,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                573,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   235,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            338,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   338,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .20
<FN>
<F1>NET OF LIFO RESERVE OF $1,584,000
<F2>RETAINED EARNINGS
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

May 24, 2011 

h0516 

Order 

 

May 24, 2011 

142478 

SHEILA K. GRAVES, 

Petitioner-Appellant, 

v SC: 142478 

 COA: 298990 

Alger CC: 09-004944-AA 

CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION, 

Respondent-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 17, 2010 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk November 23, 2009

p1116 

# Order

November 23, 2009

139589

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 139589 COA: 292641 Oakland CC: 2008-222619-FH STEPHEN HAROLD KOGOWSKI, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the July 20, 2009 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.