alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the
undersigned, as President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Operating Officer
of VSE Corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify that to the best of
the undersigned's knowledge:


	1) the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
June 30, 2009 (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

	2) the information contained in the Company's Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.


Dated: July 30, 2009                     /s/ M. A. Gauthier
                                         __________________________________
                                         M. A. Gauthier
                                         Chief Executive Officer, President
                                         and Chief Operating Officer
# C_2016007EN.01003802.xml

| 11.1.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 7/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.1.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 7/38

---

Action brought on 3 November 2015 — ZZ v Committee of the Regions

(Case F-139/15)

(2016/C 007/52)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: L. Levi, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Committee of the Regions of the European Union

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision of the Committee of the Regions by which it refused to recognise that the invalidity suffered by the applicant is occupational in origin and claim for compensation for the non-pecuniary harm allegedly suffered.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the Bureau of the Committee of the Regions of 2 December 2014, served on 6 January 2015, in so far as it accepts the conclusions of the Invalidity Committee and so refuses to recognise that the invalidity suffered by the applicant is occupational in origin within the meaning of Article 78(5) of the Staff Regulations; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Bureau of the Committee of the Regions of 2 December 2014, served on 6 January 2015, in so far as it accepts the conclusions of the Invalidity Committee and so refuses to recognise that the invalidity suffered by the applicant is occupational in origin within the meaning of Article 78(5) of the Staff Regulations;

| — | Annul the decision of the Committee of the Regions of 24 July 2015, served on 27 July 2015, rejecting the applicant’s claim; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Committee of the Regions of 24 July 2015, served on 27 July 2015, rejecting the applicant’s claim;

| — | Order the Committee of the Regions to pay the sum of EUR 25 000 as compensation for the non-pecuniary harm; |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Committee of the Regions to pay the sum of EUR 25 000 as compensation for the non-pecuniary harm;

| — | Order the Committee of the Regions to pay all the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Committee of the Regions to pay all the costs.

---
Searched for **https://ncea.acl.gov/**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **https://ncea.acl.gov/**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
# C_2016402EN.01004101.xml

| 31.10.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 402/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.10.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 402/41

---

Judgment of the General Court of 15 September 2016 — AEDEC v Commission

(Case T-91/15) (1)

1

((Technological research and development - ‘Horizon 2020’ framework programme for research and innovation - Calls for proposals in respect of work programmes 2014-2015 - Commission decision declaring the proposal submitted by the applicant ineligible - Obligation to state reasons - Rights of the defence - Proportionality - Openness - Manifest error of assessment))

(2016/C 402/46)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Asociación Española para el Desarrollo de la Epidemiología Clínica (AEDEC) (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: R. López López, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: N. Ruiz García and M. Siekierzyńska, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application on the basis of Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of the decision of 4 September 2014 in which the Commission rejected the request for financing submitted by the applicant on behalf of the consortium Latin Plan.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the Asociación Española para el Desarrollo de la Epidemiología Clínica (AEDEC) to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Asociación Española para el Desarrollo de la Epidemiología Clínica (AEDEC) to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 127, 20.4.2015.

1

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

Pursuant to the provisions of the “Government in the Sunshine Act” (5 U.S.C. 552b), notice is hereby given that at 10:30 a.m. on Tuesday, May 8, 2007, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation's Board of Directors will meet in closed session, pursuant to section 552b(c)(2), (c)(4), (c)(6), (c)(8), and (9)(A)(ii), Title 5, United States Code, to consider matters relating to the Corporation's supervisory and corporate activities. 

The meeting will be held in the Board Room on the sixth floor of the FDIC Building located at 550 17th Street, NW., Washington, DC. 

Requests for further information concerning the meeting may be directed to Mr. Robert E. Feldman, Executive Secretary of the Corporation, at (202) 898-7122. 

Dated: May 1, 2007. 

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. 

Robert E. Feldman, 

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. E7-8643 Filed 5-4-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6714-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated balance sheet and consolidated statement of operations for the
quarter March 31, 1996 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1996
<CASH>                                         258,261
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  140,933
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    128,533
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,125,282
<PP&E>                                       8,856,925
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,553,832
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              17,738,974
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,529,399
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        27,015
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                17,738,974
<SALES>                                        687,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,040,974
<CGS>                                          350,036
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  350,036
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,477,753
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,411
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                205,774
<INCOME-TAX>                                    70,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   135,774
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.05
        

</TABLE>
# C_2017078EN.01002501.xml

| 13.3.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 78/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.3.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 78/25

---

Judgment of the General Court of 26 January 2017 –GGP Italy v Commission

(Case T-474/15) (1)

1

((Protection of the health and safety of consumers and workers - Directive 2006/42/EC - Safeguard clause - National measure of withdrawal from the market and prohibition of placing on the market of a lawn mower - Requirements concerning protective devices - Successive versions of a harmonised standard - Legal certainty - Commission Decision declaring the measure justified - Error of law))

(2017/C 078/33)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Global Garden Products Italy SpA (GGP Italy) (Castelfranco Veneto, Italy) (represented by: A. Villani, L. D’Amario and M. Caccialanza, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented initially by G. Braga da Cruz and L. Cappelletti, and subsequently by G. Braga da Cruz and C. Zadra, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Intervener in support of the defendant: Republic of Latvia (represented by: I. Kalniņš and D. Pelše, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant

Re:

Re:

Action pursuant to Article 263 TFEU for annulment of Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/902 of 10 June 2015 on a measure taken by Latvia in accordance with Directive 2006/42/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council to prohibit the placing on the market of a lawn mower manufactured by GGP Italy SpA (OJ 2015 L 147, p. 22).

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/902 of 10 June 2015 on a measure taken by Latvia in accordance with Directive 2006/42/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council to prohibit the placing on the market of a lawnmower manufactured by GGP Italy SpA; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/902 of 10 June 2015 on a measure taken by Latvia in accordance with Directive 2006/42/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council to prohibit the placing on the market of a lawnmower manufactured by GGP Italy SpA;

| 2. | Dismisses the action as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

| 3. | Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Global Garden Products Italy SpA (GGP Italy) in the present proceedings and in the interlocutory proceedings; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Global Garden Products Italy SpA (GGP Italy) in the present proceedings and in the interlocutory proceedings;

| 4. | Orders the Republic of Latvia to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders the Republic of Latvia to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 328, 5.10.2015.

1

---
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.10


                              DUCOMMUN INCORPORATED

                                 DESCRIPTION OF
                    2000 EXECUTIVE OFFICER BONUS ARRANGEMENT


     The Ducommun Incorporated 2000 Executive Officer Bonus Arrangement (the
"Arrangement") is designed to reward achievement of annual operating plan
objectives in order to build profitability and provide competitive compensation
levels. The Arrangement contains a formula-based incentive plan driven by sales,
net income, cash flow and return on asset performance in excess of established
thresholds. The participants in the Arrangement are the five Ducommun corporate
officers and five subsidiary presidents.

     The Arrangement provides for bonus awards ranging from 0 to 100% of annual
base salary depending on position. The targeted bonus award under the
Arrangement is half of the maximum bonus eligibility for each individual. Bonus
awards are based on a combination of total corporate performance and on
individual performance of executive officers. The subsidiary presidents are also
measured based upon the financial performance of their operating units. All
awards are subject to the approval of the Compensation Committee of the Board of
Directors.
No. 46947.

#### Protest 34266-K/89429 of Amedeo G. Paternostro (Chicago).

*467Opinion by

Cline, J.

When the case was called for trial it was stipulated between counsel that the merchandise is of the same character as that the subject of *Paternostro*v. *United States*(6 Cust. Ct. 291, C. D. 486) and that record was incorporated herein. On the record as thus made the claim at 15 percent under paragraph 1547 (a) and T. D. 49753 was sustained.
[Cite as Jackson v. Ohio Dept. of Transp. , 2011-Ohio-4380.]



# Court of Claims of Ohio

The Ohio Judicial Center 65 South Front Street, Third Floor Columbus, OH 43215 614.387.9800 or 1.800.824.8263 www.cco.state.oh.us

HALLE ANN JACKSON Case No. 2011-05564-AD

Plaintiff Deputy Clerk Daniel R. Borchert

v. ENTRY OF DISMISSAL

OHIO DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION

Defendant

{¶1} On April 8, 2011, plaintiff was ordered to either pay the $25 filing fee or to
file a poverty statement. Plaintiff was also ordered to submit a copy of the form
complaint with her original signature. Plaintiff has failed to comply with the court orders.
Therefore, plaintiff’s action is DISMISSED, without prejudice, pursuant to Civ.R.
41(B)(1). The court shall absorb the costs of this case.

________________________________ DANIEL R. BORCHERT Deputy Clerk

cc:

Halle Ann Jackson 3423 Yellow Creek Road Akron, Ohio 44333

DRB/laa Filed 5/26/11 Sent to S.C. reporter 8/26/11
No. 65727.

#### A. V. Olsson Trading Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 61/487 (New York).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of bread similar in all material respects to that the subject of *United States*v. *Nordic Baking & Importing Co., Inc.*(47 C.C.P.A. 78, C.A.D. 733), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 307 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 307

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 6, 2008

    Received and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 
                          Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
  Expressing the sense of Congress that Members' Congressional papers 
   should be properly maintained and encouraging Members to take all 
        necessary measures to manage and preserve these papers.

Whereas Members' Congressional papers (including papers of Delegates and 
        Resident Commissioners to the Congress) serve as indispensable sources 
        for the study of American representative democracy;
Whereas these papers document vital national, regional, and local public policy 
        issues;
Whereas these papers are crucial to the public's understanding of the role of 
        Congress in making the Nation's laws and responding to the needs of its 
        citizens;
Whereas because these papers serve as essential primary sources for the history 
        of Congress, the study of these papers will illuminate the careers of 
        individual Members;
Whereas by custom, these papers are considered the personal property of the 
        Member who receives and creates them, and it is therefore the Member who 
        is responsible to decide on their ultimate disposition; and
Whereas resources are available through the Office of the Clerk of the House of 
        Representatives and the Secretary of the Senate to assist Members with 
        the professional and cost-effective management and preservation of these 
        papers: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of Congress that--
            (1) Members' Congressional papers (including papers of 
        Delegates and Resident Commissioners to the Congress) should be 
        properly maintained;
            (2) each Member of Congress should take all necessary 
        measures to manage and preserve the Member's own Congressional 
        papers; and
            (3) each Member of Congress should be encouraged to arrange 
        for the deposit or donation of the Member's own noncurrent 
        Congressional papers with a research institution that is 
        properly equipped to care for them, and to make these papers 
        available for educational purposes at a time the Member 
        considers appropriate.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 5, 2008.

            Attest:

                                            LORRAINE C. MILLER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsX ray emission from Wolf-Rayet stars with recurrent dust formationWe were granted a ROSAT observation of the Wolf-Rayet star WR 137 (equals HD 192641) to test a proposed mechanism for producing the infrared variability reported by Williams et al. (1987). These studies showed one clear infrared outburst preceded by what may be the dimming of a previous outburst. The recurrent dust formation model was put forward by Williams et al. (1990) to account for similar variability seen in WR 140, which varies in both the infrared and X-ray bands. The detected X-ray flux from WR 140 was observed to decrease from its normally high (for Wolf-Rayet stars) level as the infrared flux increased. Observation of two apparently-periodic infrared outbursts led to the hypothesis that WR 140 had an O star companion in an eccentric orbit, and that the increase in infrared flux came from a dust formation episode triggered by the compression of the O star and Wolf-Rayet star winds. The absorption of the X-rays by the increased material explained the decrease in flux at those wavelengths. If the infrared variability in WR 137 were caused by a similar interaction of the Wolf-Rayet star with a companion, we might expect that WR 137 would show corresponding X-ray variability and an X-ray luminosity somewhat higher than typical WC stars, as well as a phase-dependent non-thermal X-ray spectrum. Our goals in this study were to obtain luminosity estimates from our counting rates for comparison with previous observations of WR 137 and other WC class stars, especially WR 140; to compare the luminosity with the IR lightcurve; and to characterize the spectral shape of the X-ray emission, including the column density.Document ID19940011060Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsRawley, Gayle L.*(Applied Research Corp. Landover, MD, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateOctober 29, 1993Subject CategorySpace RadiationReport/Patent NumberR93-213NASA-CR-189321NAS 1.26:189321Accession Number94N15533Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NASA ORDER S-93065-EDistribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19940011060.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
No. 46960.

#### Protest 69498-K of Q. W. Lung Co. (Boston).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain of the drugs in question were crude they were held entitled to free entry under paragraph 1669 as claimed; those advanced in value were held dutiable at 10 percent under paragraph 34 as claimed. *Oy Wo Tong*v. *United States*(5 Cust. Ct. 70, C. D. 372) followed.
No. 40384.

#### Petitions 5570-R, etc., of Mitsubishi Shoji Kaisha, Ltd. (Portland, Maine, etc.).

Opinion by

Evans, J.

The record was found to be sufficient to show that the person making the entry placed an interpretation on the information he received from abroad different from that placed thereon by the customs officials. It was found that the importer was without intention to deceive or defraud the Government*. The petitions were therefore granted.
<PAGE>   1

                  [SAMSON BELAIR DELOITTE & TOUCHE LETTERHEAD]




CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the reference of our firm under the caption "Experts" and to the
use of our report dated March 5, 1999, with respect to the consolidated
financial statements of Syscan International Inc. in Canadian GAAP and in
Canadian $ for the period ended December 31, 1998, in the Registration
Statement Form 10-SB of AXYN Corporation for the registration of its common and
preference stock.



Samson Belair Deloitte & Touche
Chartered Accountants

February 15, 2000

<PAGE>   2
                  [SAMSON BELAIR/DELOITTE & TOUCHE LETTERHEAD]


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the reference of our firm under the caption "Experts" and to the
use of our reported dated July 22, 1999 with respect to the consolidated
financial statements of Syscan International Inc. in Canadian GAAP and in
Canadian $ for the period ended Jule 30, 1999 in the Registration Statement
Form 10-SB of AXYN Corporation for the registration of its common and
preference stock.


/s/ SAMSON BELAIR/DELOITTE & TOUCHE
Chartered Accountants

February 15, 2000