alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 35.1

Servicer Compliance Statement of AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.

This Annual Statement as to Compliance is delivered to you pursuant to Section 4.10 (a) of the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of April 6, 2016
(the Agreement) and Item 1123 of Regulation AB, executed in connection with the formation of AmeriCredit Automobile Receivables Trust 2016-2 (the Trust), the issuance of the Notes by
the Trust and the closing of the transactions and the execution and delivery of the various documents by AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. (the Servicer) and AFS SenSub Corp. in connection therewith. The capitalized terms used herein
shall have the same meanings as in the Agreement.

The undersigned certifies that I am the Executive Vice President, Corporate Controller
and Chief Accounting Officer of the Servicer. I further certify as follows:



| | 1. | I have conducted, or caused to be conducted under my supervision, a review of the Servicer during the preceding period from April 6, 2016 through December 31, 2016, and its performance under the Agreement.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, following such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such period, and, to the best of my knowledge, there has been no default in the
fulfillment of any such obligation.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.



|    |  |                                         |  |  |  |                      
|--- |  | --------------------------------------- |  |  |  | ---------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Connie Coffey                       |  |  |  | Dated: March 15, 2017
|    |  | Connie Coffey                           |  |  |  |                      
|    |  | Executive Vice President, Corporate     |  |  |  |                      
|    |  | Controller and Chief Accounting Officer |  |  |  |
# C_2016326EN.01003602.xml

| 5.9.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.9.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/36

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 11 June 2016 — FF v EASA

(Case F-6/15) (1)

1

(2016/C 326/62)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 107, 30.3.2015.

1

---
H. Con. Res. 128 Agreed to May 23, 2007

One Hundred Tenth Congress

of the

United States of America 

AT THE FIRST SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday, 

the fourth day of January, two thousand and seven 

Concurrent Resolution

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. COMMEMORATIVE DOCUMENT AUTHORIZED. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—A commemorative document in memory of 

the late President of the United States, Gerald Rudolph Ford, 

shall be printed as a House document, with illustrations and suitable binding, under the direction of the Joint Committee on 

Printing. 

(b) CONTENTS.—The document shall consist of the eulogies and 

encomiums for Gerald Rudolph Ford, as expressed in the Senate 

and the House of Representatives, together with the texts of each 

of the following: 

(1) The funeral ceremony at Palm Desert, California. 

(2) The state funeral ceremony at the Rotunda of the United 

States Capitol. 

(3) The national funeral service held at the Washington 

National Cathedral in the District of Columbia. 

(4) The interment ceremony at the Gerald Ford Presidential 

Museum, Grand Rapids, Michigan. 

SEC. 2. PRINTING OF DOCUMENT. 

In addition to the usual number of copies printed of the 

commemorative document under section 1, there shall be printed 

the lesser of—

(1) 32,500 copies, of which 22,150 copies shall be for the 

use of the House of Representatives and 10,350 copies shall 

be for the use of the Senate; or 

(2) such number of copies that does not exceed a production 

and printing cost of $600,000, with distribution of the copies 
H. Con. Res. 128—2

to be allocated in the same proportion as described in paragraph 

(1). 

Attest:

Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

Secretary of the Senate.
EXHIBIT 31.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT





Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act





I, Stuart Ducote, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of United Mortgage Trust (the "Company"), have executed this certification for furnishing to the Securities and Exchange Commission in connection with the filing with the Commission of the registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010 (the "Report"). I hereby certify that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the end of that period.


UNITED MORTGAGE TRUSTDate: August 16, 2010
By
/s/ Stuart DucotePresident
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 78 (Tuesday, April 24, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 20329]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-7779]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

[I.D. 040507E]


Fisheries of the South Atlantic; South Atlantic Fishery 
Management Council; Public Meeting

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Addendum to a public meeting notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The South Atlantic Fishery Management Council has cancelled a 
meeting of its Golden Crab Advisory Panel originally scheduled for May 
2-3, 2007, in Charleston, SC. The Rock Shrimp Advisory Panel meeting 
scheduled for May 1-2, 2007 will not be affected. See SUPPLEMENTARY 
INFORMATION.

DATES: The meeting of the Rock Shrimp Advisory Panel will take place 
May 1-2, 2007. See SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Town and Country Inn, 2008 
Savannah Highway, Charleston, SC 29407; telephone: (800) 334-6660 or 
(843) 571-1000; fax: (843) 766-9444.
    Council address: South Atlantic Fishery Management Council, 4055 
Faber Place Drive, Suite 201, North Charleston, SC 29405.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kim Iverson, Public Information 
Officer, South Atlantic Fishery Management Council; telephone: (843) 
571-4366 or toll free (866) SAFMC-10; fax: (843) 769-4520; email: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#aac1c3c784c3dccfd8d9c5c4ead9cbccc7c984c4cfde"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c4afada9eaadb2a1b6b7abaa84b7a5a2a9a7eaaaa1b0">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The original notice published in the Federal 
Register on April 10, 2007 (72 FR 17874). The meeting was for The 
Council's Rock Shrimp and Golden Crab Advisory Panels. The Golden Crab 
Advisory Panel meeting is being cancelled.Members of the Rock Shrimp 
Advisory Panel will meet from 1:30 p.m. - 5 p.m. on May 1, 2007, and 
from 8:30 a.m. - 12 noon on May 2, 2007. The joint meeting of the Rock 
Shrimp Advisory Panel and Golden Crab Advisory Panel originally 
scheduled from 1:30 p.m. - 5 p.m. on May 2, 2007 has been cancelled. 
The Golden Crab Advisory Panel meeting from 8:30 a.m. - 5 p.m. on May 
3, 2007 has been cancelled.All other information previously published 
remains unchanged.

Special Accommodations

    These meetings are physically accessible to people with 
disabilities. Requests for auxiliary aids should be directed to the 
Council office (see ADDRESSES) 3 days prior to the meetings.Note: The 
times and sequence specified in this agenda are subject to change.

    Dated: April 19, 2007.
Tracey L. Thompson,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine 
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. E7-7779 Filed 4-23-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM UNION
CARBIDE CORPORATION'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997, AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000100790
<NAME> UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                             132
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     1064
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        556
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  1954
<PP&E>                                            7577
<DEPRECIATION>                                    3886
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    6975
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             1306
<BONDS>                                           1459
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              138
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           155
<OTHER-SE>                                        2063
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      6975
<SALES>                                           4963
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  4963
<CGS>                                             3650
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     3650
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   374<F1>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  57
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    772
<INCOME-TAX>                                       228
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                529
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       529
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     3.84
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     3.49
<FN>
<F1>OTHER EXPENSES ARE EQUAL TO RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT OF 118 AND DEPRECIATION
AND AMORTIZATION OF 256.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
(Reap. Dec. 9580)

#### Frank P. Dow Co., Inc., a/c Sears, Roebuck and Co. *v.*United States

Entry Nos. 13389; 14019.

(Decided January 11, 1960)

*Lane, Young & Fox*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant. ■

Mollison, Judge:

The above-entitled cases were submitted for decision upon stipulation of counsel upon the basis of which I find that export value, as defined in section 402(d), Tariff Act of 1930, is the proper basis for the determination of the value of the bamboo blinds and sets of hardware accessories involved, and that such value in each case is the invoice unit value, which includes the cost of 3 cents (United States currency) of each set of hardware accessories accompanying eaeh bamboo blind.

Judgment will issue accordingly.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1358 

CAF 14-01236 

PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., PERADOTTO, CARNI, LINDLEY, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ. 

 

IN THE MATTER OF MAKIA S. 

--------------------------------------------- 

WYOMING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

PETITIONER-RESPONDENT; 

 

CATHERINE S., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. 

ALAN BIRNHOLZ, LAKE WORTH, FLORIDA, FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

WENDY S. SISSON, GENESEO, FOR PETITIONER-RESPONDENT.

PAMELA THIBODEAU, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD, WILLIAMSVILLE. 

 

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Wyoming County (Michael

M. Mohun, J.), entered June 18, 2014 in a proceeding pursuant to

Social Services Law § 384-b. The order, among other things,

transferred guardianship and custody of the subject child to

petitioner. 

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed

without costs.

Memorandum: Respondent mother appeals from an order terminating

her parental rights and freeing her child for adoption. The mother

refused to appear at the dispositional hearing and her attorney,

although present, elected not to participate in the mother’s absence. 

Under those circumstances, we conclude that the mother’s refusal to

appear constituted a default, and we therefore dismiss the appeal (see

Matter of Shawn A. [Milisa C.B.], 85 AD3d 1598, 1598-1599, lv denied

17 NY3d 713).

Entered: December 23, 2015 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
Exhibit 32




Certification Pursuant to Section 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsection (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Canal Capital Corporation and Subsidiaries, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify that:


TheQuarterly Report of Form 10-Q for the nine months ended July 31, 2011 (the “Form 10-Q”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated: September 12, 2011
/S/ Michael E. SchultzChief Executive OfficerDated: September 12, 2011
/S/ Reginald SchauderChief Executive Officer
Filename Identifier Date Systems

System 1

System 2

System 1

System 2

System 3

System 4

System 5

System 1

System 2

System 3

System 4

System 5

System 1

System 2

System 3

System 4

System 1

System 2

System 3

System 4

King County 300 acre site 3 Jan 2008 PLC data.xls Site 3 Jan-08 System 1

King County 300 Acre site 3 December 2007 PLC data.xls Site 3

King County 300 Acre Site 2 Dec 2007 data.xls Site 2 Dec-07

King County 300 acre site 2 Jan 2008 PLC data.xls Site 2 Jan-07

Dec-07

King County 300 Acre Site 1 Data Dec-2007.xls Site 1 Dec-07

King County 300 acre sie 1 Jan 2008 data.xls Site 1 Jan-08
Corresponding Pond

M Pond

South Pond

South Pond

M Pond

CDG Ponds

CDG Ponds
```

[House Report 110-721]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

110th Congress                                                   Report
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 2d Session                                                     110-721

======================================================================

 
   PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF THE BILL (H.R. 6304) TO AMEND THE 
FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE SURVEILLANCE ACT OF 1978 TO ESTABLISH A PROCEDURE 
 FOR AUTHORIZING CERTAIN ACQUISITIONS OF FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE, AND FOR 
                             OTHER PURPOSES

                                _______
                                

   June 19, 2008.--Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

                                _______
                                

    Mr. Arcuri, from the Committee on Rules, submitted the following

                              R E P O R T

                      [To accompany H. Res. 1285]

    The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration 
House Resolution 1285, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to 
the House with the recommendation that the resolution be 
adopted.

                SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

    The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 6304, the 
``FISA Amendments Act of 2008,'' under a closed rule. The 
resolution provides for one hour of debate equally divided 
among and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority 
member of the Committee on the Judiciary and the chairman and 
ranking minority member of the Permanent Select Committee on 
Intelligence.
    The resolution waives all points of order against 
consideration of the bill except those arising under clause 9 
or 10 of rule XXI. The resolution provides that the bill shall 
be considered as read. The resolution waives all points of 
order against provisions of the bill. The resolution provides 
one motion to recommit with or without instructions. Finally, 
the resolution permits the Chair, during consideration of the 
bill, to postpone further consideration of it to a time 
designated by the Speaker.

                         EXPLANATION OF WAIVERS

    Although the resolution waives all points of order against 
the bill and its consideration (except those arising under 
clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI), the Committee is not aware of any 
points of order against the bill or its consideration. The 
waivers of all points of order against the bill and its 
consideration (except those arising under clause 9 or 10 of 
rule XXI) are prophylactic in nature.

                                  

```
(Reap. Dec. 9831)

#### Royal Bead Novelty Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States

Entry No. 784943, etc.

(Decided November 9, 1960)

*Siegel, Mandell & Davidson*for the plaintiffs.

*George Cochran Douh,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Chief Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement enumerated in schedule “A,” hereto attached and made a part hereof, are before me for decision on a written stipulation, reading as follows:

> IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the parties hereto, subject to the approval of the Court, that the merchandise and the issues in the Appeals to Reappraisement listed in the Schedule attached hereto and made a part hereof are the same in all material respects as the merchandise and the issues decided *546in the case of *Paramount Import Co., Inc. et al.*v. *United States,*Reap. Dec. 9697, and that the record in said case be incorporated and made a part of the record herein.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the appraised values of the merchandise covered by the Appeals to Reappraisements enumerated herein, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the Appraiser in similar cases, is equal to the market value or the price at the time of exportation of such merchandise to the United States, at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States, and that there was no higher foreign value for such or similar merchandise.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the cases may be submitted on the foregoing stipulation.

In the incorporated case, I held that a charge of 15 per centum paid by the American importer to a foreign commissionaire for services rendered in connection with the purchase of merchandise in the foreign market was a *bona, fide*buying commission, and, as such, did not enter into the dutiable value of the merchandise.

On the agreed facts and following my cited decision on the law, I find that the proper basis for appraisement of the merchandise in question is export value, as defined in section 402(d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, and hold that such statutory value therefor is the appraised values, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Union Tank Car Company (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
period ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mark J. Garrette, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In witness whereof, I have executed this certification as of the 15thday of November, 2006.



/s/ Mark J. GarretteMark J. GarrettePrincipal Financial Officer
May 7, 1968

No. 68-4.

#### Kenneth W. Stolte, Jr., PVT, U. S. Army and Daniel F. Amick, PFC, U. S. Army v United States.

On consideration of the Petition ■for- Writ of Certiorari and/or Writ of Prohibition and Motion to Dismiss ■ Charges and Specifications filed in the above-entitled action, It is

ORDERED by the Court that said motion be, and the same is, hereby denied without prejudice to raise the issues on appeal should the case ever be appealed.
# C_2016392EN.01003202.xml

| 24.10.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 392/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.10.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 392/32

---

Judgment of the General Court of 14 September 2016 — Trajektna luka Split v Commission

(Case T-57/15) (1)

1

((State aid - Port services - Alleged aid to the public ferry operator of Jadrolinija - Setting of fees by the Croatian authorities for port services in the Port of Split in respect of domestic traffic at an allegedly lower level than that of the fees applied in other Croatian ports and those applied for international traffic - Private operator holding an allegedly exclusive concession for the operation of the passenger terminal at the Port of Split - Decision finding no State aid - Definition of aid - State resources))

(2016/C 392/40)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Trajektna luka Split d.d. (Split, Croatia) (represented by: M. Bauer, H.-J. Freund and S. Hankiewicz, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Bouchagiar and P.-J. Loewenthal, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application pursuant to Article 263 TFEU for the annulment of Commission Decision C(2013) 7285 final of 15 October 2014 on State Aid SA.37265 (2014/NN) — Croatia — Alleged aid to Jadrolinija.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Trajektna luka Split d.d. to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Trajektna luka Split d.d. to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 118, 13.4.2015.

1

---