alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management 

          - [ID-933-1430-FR; IDI-27169] 

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

                        This notice terminates a Recreation and Public Purposes Act Classification on 17 acres of public lands, more or less, as this classification is no longer needed under the provisions of the Recreation and Public Purposes Act, as amended (43 U.S.C. 869*et seq.*).                     

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

May 3, 2007. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Catherine D. Foster, BLM Idaho State Office, 1387 S. Vinnell Way, Boise, Idaho 83709, (208) 373-3863. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

On June 9, 1992, 17 acres of public lands were classified as suitable for Recreation and Public Purposes. The classification is hereby terminated and the segregation for the following described land is hereby terminated: 

T. 37 N., R. 1 E., B.M. 

Section 34, Lots 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 26 and 27 (Formerly a portion of Lot 6).

The area described above aggregates 17 acres of public lands, more or less, in Clearwater County. 

At 9 a.m. on May 3, 2007, the Recreation and Public Purposes Classification will be terminated. The lands will remain closed to location and entry under the public land laws and the mining laws, as they are currently withdrawn by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) for hydropower purposes: Power Project No. 10819. 

Dated: February 27, 2007. 

Jimmie Buxton, 

Chief, Branch of Lands, Minerals and Water Rights  Resource Services Division. 

[FR Doc. E7-8485 Filed 5-2-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-GG-P
### Uranium deposits of the Bulloch group of claims, Kane County, Utah

By: Ernest Pete BeroniF. A. McKeownFrederick StugardG. B. Gott

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/cir239

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
69–008 

110TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 2d Session 110–721 

PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF THE BILL (H.R. 6304) TO AMEND THE 

FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE SURVEILLANCE ACT OF 1978 TO ESTABLISH A 

PROCEDURE FOR AUTHORIZING CERTAIN ACQUISITIONS OF FOREIGN 

INTELLIGENCE, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES 

JUNE 19, 2008.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

Mr. ARCURI, from the Committee on Rules, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany H. Res. 1285] 

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House 

Resolution 1285, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to the House 

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted. 

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 6304, the ‘‘FISA 

Amendments Act of 2008,’’ under a closed rule. The resolution provides for one hour of debate equally divided among and controlled 

by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee 

on the Judiciary and the chairman and ranking minority member 

of the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence. 

The resolution waives all points of order against consideration of 

the bill except those arising under clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI. The 

resolution provides that the bill shall be considered as read. The 

resolution waives all points of order against provisions of the bill. 

The resolution provides one motion to recommit with or without instructions. Finally, the resolution permits the Chair, during consideration of the bill, to postpone further consideration of it to a time 

designated by the Speaker. 

EXPLANATION OF WAIVERS

Although the resolution waives all points of order against the bill 

and its consideration (except those arising under clause 9 or 10 of 

rule XXI), the Committee is not aware of any points of order 

against the bill or its consideration. The waivers of all points of 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with HEARING
2 

order against the bill and its consideration (except those arising 

under clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI) are prophylactic in nature. 

Æ 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with HEARING
# C_2017178EN.01001601.xml

| 6.6.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 178/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.6.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 178/16

---

Order of the General Court of 28 March 2017 — LG Electronics v EUIPO — Cyrus Wellness Consulting (VIEWTY SMART)

(Case T-488/15) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Withdrawal of the application for registration - No need to adjudicate))

(2017/C 178/19)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: LG Electronics, Inc. (Seoul, Republic of Korea) (represented by: M. Graf, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: L. Rampini, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO intervening before the General Court: Cyrus Wellness Consulting GmbH (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: A. Wulff and U. Hildebrandt, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO intervening before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 11 June 2015 (Case R 1734/2014-2), relating to opposition proceedings between Cyrus Wellness Consulting GmbH and LG Electronics, Inc.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

| 2. | LG Electronics, Inc., is ordered to bear its own costs and those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) and Cyrus Wellness Consulting GmbH. |
| --- | --- |

2.

LG Electronics, Inc., is ordered to bear its own costs and those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) and Cyrus Wellness Consulting GmbH.

---

(1)  OJ C 337, 12.10.2015.

1

---
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-40105

Summary Calendar

 

ROBERT LAWRENCE MORGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

DAVID HARO, CO III, Michael Unit; UNIDENTIFIED STEWART,

CO III, Michael Unit; UNIDENTIFIED BAKER, Sergeant,

Michael Unit,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

- - - - - - - - - -

March 31, 1997

Before DAVIS EMILIO M. GARZA and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The magistrate judge declined to rule on a motion for leave

to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal filed by Texas

prisoner Robert Lawrence Morgan, #452774. In accordance with the

Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA):

(1) If a prisoner brings a civil action or files an

appeal in forma pauperis, the prisoner shall be

required to pay the full amount of a filing fee. The

court shall assess and, when funds exist, collect, as a

partial payment of any court fees required by law, an

initial partial filing fee of 20 percent of the greater

of --

(A) the average monthly deposits to the prisoner’s

account; or
No. 97-40105

- 2 -

(B) the average monthly balance in the prisoner’s

account for the 6-month period immediately preceding

the filing of the complaint or notice of appeal.

(2) After payment of the initial partial filing fee,

the prisoner shall be required to make monthly payments

of 20 percent of the preceding month’s income credited

to the prisoner’s account.

28 U.S.C. § 1915(b). A prisoner who seeks to proceed IFP on

appeal must obtain leave to so proceed despite proceeding IFP in

the district court. Jackson v. Stinnett, 102 F.3d 132, 136 (5th

Cir. 1996).

We hold that the financial screening and assessment

procedures of the PLRA regarding appellate filing fees are to be

conducted by the district courts. When a district court grants a

prisoner leave to proceed IFP on appeal, the district court must

assess the initial partial filing fee and order payment of the

remainder of the filing fee as directed by the PLRA. 

Accordingly, the case is REMANDED to the district court so that

the district court may rule on the IFP motion and, if granted,

order the payment of the appellate filing fee pursuant to

§ 1915(b). After this determination is made, the district court

shall return the case to this court for further proceedings.

REMANDED.
# C_2017151EN.01000501.xml

| 15.5.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 151/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.5.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 151/5

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 15 March 2017 — Polynt SpA v New Japan Chemical, REACh ChemAdvice GmbH, Sitre Srl, European Chemicals Agency, Kingdom of the Netherlands, European Commission

(Case C-323/15 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (REACH Regulation) - Article 57(f) - Authorisation - Substances of very high concern - Identification - Equivalent level of concern - Cyclohexane-1,2-dicarboxylic anhydride, cis-cyclohexane-1,2-dicarboxylic anhydride and trans-cyclohexane-1,2-dicarboxylic anhydride))

(2017/C 151/06)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Polynt SpA (represented by: C. Mereu and M. Grunchard, avocats)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: New Japan Chemical (represented by: C. Mereu and M. Grunchard, avocats), REACh ChemAdvice GmbH (represented by: C. Mereu and M. Grunchard, avocats), Sitre Srl (represented by: C. Mereu and M. Grunchard, avocats), European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) (represented by: M. Heikkilä, C. Buchanan, W. Broere and T. Zbihlej, acting as Agents, and J. Stuyck, advocaat), Kingdom of the Netherlands (represented by: C. Schillemans and M. Bulterman, acting as Agents), European Commission (represented by: D. Kukovec and K. Mifsud-Bonnici, acting as Agents)

Other parties to the proceedings:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders Polynt SpA to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA); |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Polynt SpA to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA);

| 3. | Orders the Kingdom of the Netherlands and the European Commission to bear their own costs; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Kingdom of the Netherlands and the European Commission to bear their own costs;

| 4. | Orders New Japan Chemical and REACh ChemAdvice GmbH to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders New Japan Chemical and REACh ChemAdvice GmbH to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 311, 21.9.2015.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from (A) the
condensed consolidated balance sheet and income statement of UGI Utilities, Inc.
as of and for the six months ended March 31, 1999 and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such (B) financial statements included in UGI
Utilities' quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 1999.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000100548
<NAME> UGI UTILITIES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           4,221
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   76,080
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,034
<INVENTORY>                                     10,554
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               108,744
<PP&E>                                         811,811
<DEPRECIATION>                                 263,041
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 734,378
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          173,819
<BONDS>                                        180,037
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           20,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        60,259
<OTHER-SE>                                     163,407
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   734,378
<SALES>                                        280,462
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               280,462
<CGS>                                          142,785
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  142,785
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,969
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,762
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 59,864
<INCOME-TAX>                                    22,664
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             37,200
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    37,200
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0<F1>
<FN>
<F1>There are no publicly held shares outstanding.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
# C_2017070EN.01002101.xml

| 6.3.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 70/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.3.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 70/21

---

Order of the General Court of 12 January 2017 — ACDA and Others v Commission

(Case T-242/15) (1)

1

((Action for annulment - State aid - Extension of concession contracts - Motorway investment plan in France - Decision not to raise any objections - Association - Act not of individual concern - Regulatory act entailing implementing measures - Inadmissibility))

(2017/C 070/29)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Automobile club des avocats (ACDA) (Paris, France), Organisation des transporteurs routiers européens (OTRE) (Bordeaux, France), Fédération française des motards en colère (FFMC) (Paris), Fédération française de motocyclisme (Paris), Union nationale des automobile clubs (Paris) (represented by: M. Lesage, lawyer)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Flynn and R. Sauer, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action on the basis of Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of Commission Decision C(2014) 7850 final of 28 October 2014 on State aid SA.2014/N 38271 — France — Motorway investment plan.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

| 2. | There is no need to adjudicate on the application to intervene submitted by the French Republic. |
| --- | --- |

2.

There is no need to adjudicate on the application to intervene submitted by the French Republic.

| 3. | The Automobile club des avocats (ACDA), the Organisation des transporteurs routiers européens (OTRE), the Fédération française des motards en colère (FFMC), the Fédération française de motocyclisme and the Union nationale des automobile clubs shall bear their own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The Automobile club des avocats (ACDA), the Organisation des transporteurs routiers européens (OTRE), the Fédération française des motards en colère (FFMC), the Fédération française de motocyclisme and the Union nationale des automobile clubs shall bear their own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission.

| 4. | The French Republic shall bear its own costs in relation to the application to intervene. |
| --- | --- |

4.

The French Republic shall bear its own costs in relation to the application to intervene.

---

(1)  OJ C 236, 20.7.2015.

1

---
ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE



Reference is hereby made
to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of December 1, 2016, by and among DEUTSCHE MORTGAGE & ASSET RECEIVING
CORPORATION, as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, KEYBANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Special
Servicer, WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator,
Paying Agent and Custodian, and PARK BRIDGE LENDER SERVICES LLC, as Operating Advisor and Asset Representations Reviewer with respect
to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2016-CD2 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not
otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.



Pursuant to Section 10.11
of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities of the Master Servicer
during the period from December 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance
per the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review,
the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting
Period.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------







IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the
undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2017.













Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President 
Wells Fargo Bank























Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 85 (Thursday, May 3, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 24584]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-8481]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisition of Shares of Bank or 
Bank Holding Companies

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. 
The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth 
in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the office of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than May 18, 2007.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (Glenda Wilson, Community 
Affairs Officer) 411 Locust Street, St. Louis, Missouri 63166-2034:
    1. Wilson-Gardner Family Control Group, Jackson, Mississippi, which 
consists of Alice King Harrison, Forrest City, Arkansas; Fred Gillaspy 
Wilson, Jackson, Mississippi; John Frederick Wilson, Jackson, 
Mississippi; Margaret Gardner Wilson, Ridgeland, Mississippi; Margaret 
Wilson Ethridge, Madison, Mississippi; Ermis King Wilson, Sterlington, 
Louisiana; Edna Earl Douglas, Memphis, Tennessee; Alison Wilson Page, 
Sterlington, Louisiana; and Ermis M. Wilson, Sterlington, Louisiana; to 
retain control of Commerce Bancorp, Inc., and thereby indirectly retain 
voting shares of Bank of Commerce, both of Greenwood, Mississippi.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, April 30, 
2007.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. E7-8481 Filed 5-2-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
# C_2016392EN.01003802.xml

| 24.10.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 392/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.10.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 392/38

---

Judgment of the General Court of 13 September 2016 — Pohjanmäki v Council

(Case T-410/15 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - Civil service - Officials - Promotion - 2013 promotion year - Respective roles of the Appointing Authority and the Joint Consultative Committee - Absence of staff reports - Failure on the part of the members of the JCC to consult the staff reports - Compatibility of the functions of the rapporteur in the JCC with those of the former rapporteur - Equal treatment - Obligation to state reasons))

(2016/C 392/49)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Jaana Pohjanmäki (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: M. Velardo, lawyer)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: Council of the European Union (represented by: E. Rebasti and M. Bauer, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 18 May 2015, Pohjanmäki v Council (F-44/14, EU:F:2015:46) seeking to have that judgment set aside.

Pohjanmäki

Council

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders Ms Jaana Pohjanmäki to bear her own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the Council of the European Union in the appeal. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Ms Jaana Pohjanmäki to bear her own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the Council of the European Union in the appeal.

---

(1)  OJ C 337, 12.10.2015.

1

---