alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 14 (Tuesday, January 23, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 2907]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-850]



[[Page 2907]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration


Manufacturer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Application

    Pursuant to Sec.  1301.33(a) of Title 21 of the Code of Federal 
Regulations (CFR), this is notice that on August 21, 2006, Cedarburg 
Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 870 Badger Circle, Grafton, Wisconsin 53024, 
made application by renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration 
(DEA) to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of the basic classes of 
controlled substances listed in schedule I and II:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                    Drug                               Schedule
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tetrahydrocannabinols (7370)...............  I
Dihydromorphine (9145).....................  I
Dihydrocodeine (9120)......................  II
Oxycodone (9143)...........................  II
Hydromorphone (9150).......................  II
Hydrocodone (9193).........................  II
Sufentanil (9740)..........................  II
Fentanyl (9801)............................  II
Remifentanil (9739)........................  II
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The company plans to manufacture the listed controlled substances 
in bulk for distribution to its customers.
    Any other such applicant and any person who is presently registered 
with DEA to manufacture such substances may file comments or objections 
to the issuance of the proposed registration pursuant to 21 CFR 
1301.33(a).
    Any such written comments or objections being sent via regular mail 
should be addressed, in quintuplicate, to the Deputy Assistant 
Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement 
Administration, Washington, DC 20537, Attention: DEA Federal Register 
Representative/ODL; or any being sent via express mail should be sent 
to DEA Headquarters, Attention: DEA Federal Register Representative/
ODL, 2401 Jefferson-Davis Highway, Alexandria, Virginia 22301; and must 
be filed no later than March 26, 2007.

    Dated: January 16, 2007.
Joseph T. Rannazzisi,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. E7-850 Filed 1-22-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
# C_2015354EN.01001201.xml

| 26.10.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 354/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 354/12

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 15 July 2015 — BAWAG PSK Bank für Arbeit und Wirtschaft und Österreichische Postsparkasse AG v Verein für Konsumenteninformation

(Case C-375/15)

(2015/C 354/15)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Oberster Gerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: BAWAG PSK Bank für Arbeit und Wirtschaft und Österreichische Postsparkasse AG

Appellant:

Respondent: Verein für Konsumenteninformation

Respondent:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Is Article 41(1) in conjunction with Article 36(1) of Directive 2007/64/EC (1) on payment services in the internal market (‘the Payment Services Directive’) to be interpreted as meaning that information (in electronic format) transmitted by the bank to the e-mail inbox of the customer as part of online banking (eBanking), so that the customer can retrieve this information by clicking on it after logging in to the eBanking website, has been provided on a durable medium? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Is Article 41(1) in conjunction with Article 36(1) of Directive 2007/64/EC (1) on payment services in the internal market (‘the Payment Services Directive’) to be interpreted as meaning that information (in electronic format) transmitted by the bank to the e-mail inbox of the customer as part of online banking (eBanking), so that the customer can retrieve this information by clicking on it after logging in to the eBanking website, has been provided on a durable medium?

1

| 2. | If the answer to Question 1 is in the negative:
  Is Article 41(1) in conjunction with Article 36(1) of the Payment Services Directive to be interpreted as meaning that in such a case






  (a) | the information from the bank is indeed provided on a durable medium, but not notified to the customer, merely made accessible to him, or |
| --- | --- | --- |

2.

If the answer to Question 1 is in the negative:

Is Article 41(1) in conjunction with Article 36(1) of the Payment Services Directive to be interpreted as meaning that in such a case

(a)

the information from the bank is indeed provided on a durable medium, but not notified to the customer, merely made accessible to him, or

| (b) | all that happens is that the information is made accessible without the use of a durable medium? |
| --- | --- |

(b)

all that happens is that the information is made accessible without the use of a durable medium?

---

(1)  Directive 2007/64/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 November 2007 on payment services in the internal market amending Directives 97/7/EC, 2002/65/EC, 2005/60/EC and 2006/48/EC and repealing Directive 97/5/EC (OJ 2007 L 319, p. 1).

1

---
# C_2015081EN.01002401.xml

| 9.3.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 81/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.3.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 81/24

---

Action brought on 8 January 2015 — Leopard v OHIM — Smart Market (LEOPARD true racing)

(Case T-7/15)

(2015/C 081/31)

Language in which the application was lodged: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Leopard SA (Howald, Luxembourg) (represented by: P. Lê Dai, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Smart Market, SLU (Alcantarilla, Spain)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: Community figurative mark containing the word elements ‘LEOPARD true racing’ — Application for registration No 10 139 202

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings

Procedure before OHIM

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 2 October 2014 in Case R 1866/2013-1

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul in part the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul in part the contested decision;

| — | order OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order OHIM to pay the costs.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
DENIED and Opinion Filed June 16, 2023 

# S

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-23-00598-CV IN RE CONNIE DENISE SIGEL IN HER CAPACITY AS INDEPENDENT

EXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OF FLO DELMARENE MCCARTHY, DECEASED, Relator Original Proceeding from the Probate Court No. 1 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. PR-18-00439-1 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Reichek, Carlyle, and Kennedy Opinion by Justice Kennedy In her June 14, 2023 petition for writ of mandamus, relator seeks relief from two probate court orders issued in c onnection with an independent estate administration. The first order set aside an earlier distribution order. The second order is a pretrial scheduling order, se tting certain issues for a jury trial. Entitlement to mandamus relief requires re lator to show that the trial court clearly abused its discretion and that rela tor lacks an adequate appellate remedy. In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am. , 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). Relator bears the burden of provi ding the Court with a sufficient record to show she is entitled to relief. Walker v. Packer , 827 S.W.2d 833, 837 (Tex. 1992)–2– (orig. proceeding). After reviewing relato r’s petition and the record before us, we conclude that relator has fa iled to demonstrate an entitle ment to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.8(a). We also deny relator’s emergency motion to stay as moot.

230598F.P05 /Nanc y Kenned y/ NANCY KENNEDY JUSTICE
EXHIBIT 99.1

             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
               SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Trinity Learning Corporation (the "Company")
Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Douglas D. Cole, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Date: May 20, 2003                 /s/  DOUGLAS D. COLE
                                   --------------------------------
                                   Douglas D. Cole
                                   Chief Executive Officer
No. 46924.

#### Protests 994921-G, etc., of Eurasia Import Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel to the effect-that certain of the hats are not blocked or trimmed and that they are not bleached, dyed, colored, or stained, not sewed, and not known as harvest hats, they were held dutiable at 25 percent under paragraph 1504 (b) (1) as claimed. Abstract 46498 followed.
# C_2017006EN.01001701.xml

| 9.1.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 6/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.1.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 6/17

---

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 26 October 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van Cassatie — Belgium) — Rijksdienst voor Pensioenen v Willem Hoogstad

(Case C-269/15) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Social security - Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 - Article 4 - Material scope - Deductions from statutory old-age pensions and all other supplementary benefits - Article 13 - Determination of the applicable legislation - Residence in another Member State))

(2017/C 006/21)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Referring court

Hof van Cassatie

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Rijksdienst voor Pensioenen

Applicant:

Defendant: Willem Hoogstad

Defendant:

Intervener: Rijksinstituut voor ziekte- en invaliditeitsverzekering

Intervener:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 13(1) of Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 of the Council of 14 June 1971 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons, to self-employed persons and to members of their families moving within the Community, as amended and updated by Council Regulation (EC) No 118/97 of 2 December 1996, as amended by Council Regulation (EC) No 1606/98 of 29 June 1998, precludes a national law, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which imposes levies of contributions that have a direct and sufficiently relevant link with the legislation governing the branches of social security listed in Article 4 of that regulation on payments made under supplementary pension schemes even though the beneficiary of that supplementary pension scheme does not reside in that Member State and is subject, in accordance with Article 13(2)(f) of that regulation, to the social security legislation of the Member State in which he resides.

---

(1)  OJ C 311, 21.9.2015.

1

---
122 STAT. 652 PUBLIC LAW 110–195—MAR. 12, 2008 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 2272: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD: 

Vol. 153 (2007): Nov. 16, considered and passed Senate. 

Vol. 154 (2008): Feb. 28, considered and passed House. 

Æ 

Public Law 110–195 

110th Congress 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service known as the Southpark 

Station in Alexandria, Louisiana, as the John ‘‘Marty’’ Thiels Southpark Station, 

in honor and memory of Thiels, a Louisiana postal worker who was killed in 

the line of duty on October 4, 2007. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. JOHN ‘‘MARTY’’ THIELS SOUTHPARK STATION. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service known as the Southpark Station in Alexandria, Louisiana, 

shall be known and designated as the ‘‘John ‘Marty’ Thiels 

Southpark Station’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘John ‘Marty’ Thiels Southpark Station’’. 

Approved March 12, 2008. 

Mar. 12, 2008 

[S. 2272]
Bureau of Labor Statistics

Series Id:

Series title:

Labor force status:

Type of data:

Age:

Years:

Year Qtr1 Qtr2 Qtr3 Qtr4 Annual

2011 2122

Unemployed

Number in thousands

55 years and over

2011 to 2011

Labor Force Statistics from the Current Population Survey

Original Data Value

LNU03024230Q

Not Seasonally Adjusted

(Unadj) Unemployment Level - 55 yrs. & over

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics Generated on: May 16, 2011 (02:09:49 PM)
No. 49867.

#### Protests 100689-K, etc., of Amdelta Leather Co., Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Walker, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
Exhibit 32

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

      Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsection (a)
      and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each
      of the undersigned officers of Canal Capital Corporation and Subsidiaries,
      a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify that:

      The Quarterly Report of Form 10-Q for the three months ended January 31,
      2004 (the "Form 10-Q") of the Company fully complies with the requirements
      of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
      information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.


Date: March 15, 2004                         /S/ Michael E. Schultz
                                             -----------------------
                                             Chief Executive Officer


Date: March 15, 2004                         /S/ Reginald Schauder
                                             -----------------------
                                             Chief Financial Officer


                                       39
Exhibit 31.2


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Paul Spector, certify that,

(1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10K of Aris Industries, Inc.;

(2) Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

(3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

(4) The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and we have:

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

(b) (Intentionally omitted)

(c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and

(d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

(5) The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent function):

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably to
adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize, and
report financial information; and

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the Company's internal controls;


Date:  August 13, 2003


/s/ Paul Spector
    Chief Financial Officer
# C_2019363EN.01001301.xml

| 28.10.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 363/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.10.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 363/13

---

Order of the General Court of 5 September 2019 — Italy v Commission

(Case T-313/15 and T-317/15) (1)

(Rules on the use of languages - Notices of open competition for the recruitment of administrators - Choice of second language from three languages - Regulation No 1 - Article 1d(1), Article 27 and Article 28(f) of the Staff Regulations - Principle of non-discrimination - Proportionality - Manifestly well-founded action)

(2019/C 363/19)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Italian Republic (represented by: G. Palmieri, acting as Agent, and P. Gentili, avvocato dello Stato)

Defendant: European Commission (represented initially by: J. Currall and G. Gattinara, and subsequently by G. Gattinara, F. Simonetti and D. Milanowska, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the applicant: Kingdom of Spain (represented by: J. García-Valdecasas Dorrego, acting as Agent)

Re:

In Case T-313/15, application based on Article 263 TFEU and asking for annulment of the notice of open competition EPSO/AD/301/15 to draw up a reserve list of administrators (AD 5) (OJ 2015 C 92 A, p.1), and, in Case T-317/15, application based on Article 263 TFEU and asking for annulment of the notice of open competition EPSO/AD/3012/15 to draw up a reserve list of administrators in the field of audit (AD 5) (OJ 2015 C 99 A, p.1).

Operative part of the order

| 1. | Cases T-313/15 and T-317/15 are joined for the purpose of the present order. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Cases T-313/15 and T-317/15 are joined for the purpose of the present order.

| 2. | The notice of open competition EPSO/AD/301/15 to draw up a reserve list of administrators (AD 5) and the notice of open competition EPSO/AD/3012/15 to draw up a reserve list of administrators in the field of audit (AD 5) are annulled. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The notice of open competition EPSO/AD/301/15 to draw up a reserve list of administrators (AD 5) and the notice of open competition EPSO/AD/3012/15 to draw up a reserve list of administrators in the field of audit (AD 5) are annulled.

| 3. | The European Commission shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the Italian Republic. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The European Commission shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the Italian Republic.

| 4. | The Kingdom of Spain shall bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

4.

The Kingdom of Spain shall bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 262, 10.8.2015.

---
ObjectSoft Corporation
                              Continental Plaza III
                              433 Hackensack Avenue
                          Hackensack, New Jersey 07601


                                                              January 14, 2000


Headwaters Capital
220 Montgomery Street
Suite 500
San Fransisco, CA 94104
Attention: Tim Keating

HSBC James Capel Canada, Inc.
66 Wellington Street
Toronto-Dominion Bank Tower
Toronto-Dominion Centre, Suite 530
Box 67
Toronto Ontario M5K 1E7
Attention: Isser Elishis

Settondown Capital International, Ltd.
Charlotte House, Charlotte Street
P.O. Box N. 9204
Nassau, Bahamas




Dear Sir or Madam

                  This letter records our agreement that, notwithstanding the
terms of the registration rights agreement among the investors referred to
therein, Settondown Capital International, Ltd. and ObjectSoft Corporation
("ObjectSoft"), dated as of March 17, 1999, ObjectSoft will not register under
the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, register or qualify under any state
securities laws the shares of common stock of Headwaters Capital, HSBC James
Capel Canada, Inc. and Settondown Capital International, Ltd. issuable upon
exercise of warrants issued in the series E private placement.

<PAGE>




                  Please sign the enclosed copy of this letter in the space
below and return it to me at your earliest convenience.


                                       Yours sincerely,


                                       /s/ David E.Y. Sarna
                                       --------------------
                                           David E.Y. Sarna



Agreed to and accepted by:
HEADWATERS CAPITAL



By:  /s/     Jonathon Ungar
     -------------------------------------------
      Name:  Jonathon Ungar
      Title: Member

Agreed to and accepted by:
HSBC JAMES CAPEL CANADA, INC.



By:  /s/     Stephen Rider
     -------------------------------------------
      Name:  Stephen Rider
      Title: Executive Vice President and
             Managing Director


Agreed to and accepted by:
SETTONDOWN CAPITAL INTERNATIONAL, LTD.



By:  /s/      Anthony L.M. Inder Reiden
     -------------------------------------------
      Name:   Anthony L.M. Inder Reiden
      Title:  Director