alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2016462EN.01001602.xml

| 12.12.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 462/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.12.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 462/16

---

Judgment of the General Court of 28 October 2016 — Unicorn v EUIPO — Mercilink Equipment Leasing (UNICORN)

(Case T-125/15) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU figurative mark UNICORN - Earlier national word and figurative marks UNICORN and earlier national figurative mark representing a unicorn’s head - Relative ground for refusal - Reputation - Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2016/C 462/19)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Unicorn a.s. (Prague, Czech Republic) (represented by: L. Lorenc, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Rajh, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Mercilink Equipment Leasing Ltd (Limassol, Cyprus)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 13 January 2015 (Case R 150/2014-5), concerning opposition proceedings between Unicorn and Mercilink Equipment Leasing.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Unicorn a.s. to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Unicorn a.s. to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 171, 26.5.2015.

1

---
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 25 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 16, 2007 

Received and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and 

Forestry 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of Congress that it is the goal of 

the United States that, not later than January 1, 2025, 

the agricultural, forestry, and working land of the United 

States should provide from renewable resources not less 

than 25 percent of the total energy consumed in the 

United States and continue to produce safe, abundant, 

and affordable food, feed, and fiber. 

Whereas the United States has a quantity of renewable energy resources that is sufficient to supply a significant 

portion of the energy needs of the United States; 

Whereas the agricultural, forestry, and working land of the 

United States can help ensure a sustainable domestic energy system; 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

HCON 25 RFS 

Whereas accelerated development and use of renewable energy technologies provide numerous benefits to the 

United States, including improved national security, improved balance of payments, healthier rural economies, 

improved environmental quality, and abundant, reliable, 

and affordable energy for all citizens of the United 

States; 

Whereas the production of transportation fuels from renewable energy would help the United States meet rapidly 

growing domestic and global energy demands, reduce the 

dependence of the United States on energy imported 

from volatile regions of the world that are politically unstable, stabilize the cost and availability of energy, and 

safeguard the economy and security of the United States; 

Whereas increased energy production from domestic renewable resources would attract substantial new investments 

in energy infrastructure, create economic growth, develop 

new jobs for the citizens of the United States, and increase the income for farm, ranch, and forestry jobs in 

the rural regions of the United States; 

Whereas increased use of renewable energy is practical and 

can be cost effective with the implementation of supportive policies and proper incentives to stimulate markets and infrastructure; and 

Whereas public policies aimed at enhancing renewable energy 

production and accelerating technological improvements 

will further reduce energy costs over time and increase 

market demand: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that it is 

3 the goal of the United States that, not later than January 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
3 

HCON 25 RFS 

1 1, 2025, the agricultural, forestry, and working land of 

2 the United States should provide from renewable resources 

3 not less than 25 percent of the total energy consumed in 

4 the United States and continue to produce safe, abundant, 

5 and affordable food, feed, and fiber. 

Passed the House of Representatives October 15, 

2007. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
# C_2015371EN.01004701.xml

| 9.11.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 371/47 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.11.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 371/47

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 30 September 2015 — Nunes v Court of Auditors

(Case F-54/15)

((Civil Service - Contract staff - Dispute concerning the terms of employment - Claim out of time - Failure to comply with the pre-litigation procedure - Manifest inadmissibility))

(2015/C 371/49)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Carlos Nunes (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: M. Petit, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Court of Auditors

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of the decision adopted by the European Court of Auditors in April 2009 to amend the applicant’s employment status and remuneration and application retroactively to adjust his remuneration from April 2009.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.

| 2. | Mr Nunes shall bear his own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Mr Nunes shall bear his own costs.

---
# C_2016335EN.01004602.xml

| 12.9.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 335/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.9.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 335/46

---

Order of the General Court of 14 July 2016 — Alcimos Consulting v ECB

(Case T-368/15) (1)

1

((Action for annulment - Action for compensation - Decisions adopted by the Governing Council of the ECB - Provision of emergency liquidity assistance to Greek banks - Ceiling - Lack of direct concern - Inadmissibility - Infringement of procedural requirements))

(2016/C 335/61)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Alcimos Consulting SMPC (Athens, Greece) (represented by: F. Rodolaki, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Central Bank (represented by: K. Laurinavičius and M. Szablewska, acting as Agents, assisted by H.-G. Kamann, lawyer)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application, first, under Article 263 TFEU, for annulment of the decision of the Governing Council of the ECB of 28 June 2015 by which it was decided to maintain the ceiling to the provision of emergency liquidity assistance to Greek banks at the level decided on 26 June 2015 and for annulment of the decision of the Governing Council of the ECB of 6 July 2015 by which it was decided to maintain that ceiling at that same level and to adjust the haircuts on collateral accepted by the Bank of Greece in that respect, and application, secondly, under Article 268 TFEU, for compensation for the damage which the applicant allegedly suffered as a result of those decisions.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

| 2. | Alcimos Consulting SMPC shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Alcimos Consulting SMPC shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 302, 14.9.2015.

1

---
(logo)Deutsche Bank

1761East St. Andrew Place

SantaAna, CA 92705-4934

 

Tel714 247 6000

Fax714 247 6009 

 

 

ANNUAL STATEMENT AS TO COMPLIANCE

 

COMM 2016-787S Mortgage Trust

 

Theundersigned, David Co, a Director of Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, asthe Certificate Administrator (a "Certifying Servicer") under theTrust and Servicing Agreement, dated as of March 1, 2016 (the"Agreement''), by and among, Deutsche Mortgage & Asset ReceivingCorporation, as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as MasterServicer and Special Servicer, Wilmington Trust, National Association, asTrustee, and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as CertificateAdministrator, Paying Agent, and Custodian, here by certifies in accordancewith Section 11.07 of the Agreement:

 

A) A review of suchCertifying Servicer's activities from January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2018 (the"reporting period") and of such Certifying Servicer's performanceunder the Agreement has been made under such officer's supervision and

B) That, as to thebest of such officer’s knowledge, based on such review, such CertifyingServicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement, in all materialrespects through the reporting period.

 

DEUTSCHEBANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS

AsCertificate Administrator

 

 

/s/Ronaldo Reyes 

BY:Ronaldo Reyes 

Title:Vice President

Date:March 1, 2019

 

 

/s/Karlene Collins

BY:Karlene Collins

Title:Assistant Vice President 

Date:March 1, 2019
# C_2016156EN.01005502.xml

| 2.5.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 156/55 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.5.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 156/55

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 18 March 2016 — Kerstens v Commission

(Case F-23/15) (1)

1

((Civil Service - Officials - Obligations - Acts contrary to the dignity of the civil service - Dissemination of insulting remarks with regard to another official - Article 12 of the Staff Regulations - Disciplinary procedure - Enquiry in the form of an examination of the facts - Reprimand - Article 9(1)(b) of Annex IX to the Staff Regulations - Consequences of the irregularity))

(2016/C 156/77)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Petrus Kerstens (Overijse, Belgium) (represented by: C. Mourato, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T.S. Bohr and C. Ehrbar, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of the decision to impose a disciplinary penalty in the form of a reprimand on the applicant.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Mr Petrus Kerstens to bear his own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Petrus Kerstens to bear his own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 127, 20.4.2015, p. 42.

1

---
Document

CENTERPOINT ENERGY 2005 DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN
 (As Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 2009)


Partial Termination Amendment
WHEREAS, CenterPoint Energy, Inc., a Texas corporation (the “Company”), maintains the CenterPoint Energy 2005 Deferred Compensation Plan, as amended and restated effective January 1, 2009 (the “Plan”);
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 7.1 of the Plan, the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”) may amend or terminate the Plan at any time;
WHEREAS, certain Participants of the Plan (the “Enable Participants”) experienced a change in control event (as defined in Treas. Reg. § 1.409A-3(i)(5)) on December 2, 2021 in connection with the acquisition of Enable Midstream Partners, LP (“Enable”) by Energy Transfer LP (the “Enable CIC Event”);
WHEREAS, the Company desires to irrevocably terminate and liquidate the Plan with respect to each Enable Participant in accordance with Treas. Reg. § 1.409A-3(j)(4)(ix)(B); and 
WHEREAS, on February 16, 2022 (the “Approval Date”), the Board approved such termination and liquidation of the Plan, and this amendment to the Plan, and also approved, with respect to each Enable Participant, the termination and liquidation of all agreements, methods, programs and other arrangements sponsored by the Company or an affiliate immediately after the CIC Event which deferrals of compensation are, together with deferrals under the Plan, treated as deferred under a single plan under Treas. Reg. § 1.409A-1(c)(2) so that all Enable Participants are required to receive all amounts of compensation deferred under such terminated agreements, methods, programs, and other arrangements within 12 months of the Approval Date; 
NOW, THEREFORE, the Company does hereby amend the Plan as follows, effective as of March 1, 2022 (the “Termination Date”):
1








1.The Plan is hereby irrevocably terminated with respect to each Enable Participant.
2.As soon as administratively practicable after the Termination Date, and in no event later than 12 months following the Approval Date, the benefit under Plan for each Enable Participant shall be irrevocably liquidated and paid to the Enable Participant in a single lump sum cash payment. 
3.It is intended that the termination of the Plan with respect to the Enable Participants as set forth herein shall comply with the requirements of Treas. Reg. § 1.409A-3(j)(4)(ix)(B), and this amendment shall be interpreted and administered consistent therewith.
4.Capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings set forth in the Plan.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, CenterPoint Energy, Inc. has executed these presents as evidenced by the signature of its officer affixed hereto, this 24th day of February, 2022, but effective as set forth above.
						
		CENTERPOINT ENERGY, INC.
By:/s/ David J. Lesar    
David J. Lesar
President and Chief Executive Officer



ATTEST:
/s/ Vincent A. Mercaldi    
Vincent A. Mercaldi
Assistant Corporate Secretary
2
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-10158 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus NIDAL ABDULAFATTAH AL-ZURAQI, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:95-CR-114-A

- - - - - - - - - - February 21, 1997 Before SMITH, EMILIO M. GARZA, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Nidal Abdulafattah Al-Zuraqi appeals from his sentence following his conviction for two counts of bank fraud. He argues that the district court erred by increasing his offense level pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3C1.1 for obstruction of justice and that this court has incorrectly interpreted the commentary to § 3C1.1. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Given the trial testimony of both Al-Zuraqi and a bank employee, the district court did not clearly err by determining that Al-ZuraqiNo. 96-10158 - 2 - had given false testimony and thus obstructed justice. Further, Al-Zuraqi’s claim that this court has misinterpreted the law is foreclosed by the rule in this Circuit that one panel may not overrule the decision of another. See United States v. Storm , 36 F.3d 1289, 1297 (5th Cir. 1994), cert. denied , 115 S. Ct. 1798 (1995). Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is
AFFIRMED.
AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 32.2
                                                                    ------------


                         CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906
                                     OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Unico American
Corporation (the "Company") for the period ended June 30, 2007, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Lester A. Aaron, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
    the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



                    /s/  Lester A. Aaron
                    --------------------
           Name:    Lester A. Aaron
           Title:   Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
           Date:    August 13, 2007




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Unico American Corporation, and
will be retained by Unico American Corporation, and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v JOHN L. WILLIAMSON, Corporal, U. S. Marine Corps, Appellant

8 USCMA 495, 24 CMR 305

No. 10,398

Decided December 13, 1957

*Commander Charles Timblin,*USN, was on the brief for Appellant, Accused.

*Lieutenant Colonel Charles H. Beale, Jr.,*USMC, was on the brief for Appellee, United States.

Opinion of the Court

Homer FERGUSON, Judge:

The unauthorized absence of the accused- from his unit for a period of seven months resulted in his trial by general court-martial, in which he was found guilty of desertion, in violation of Article 85, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 885. The conviction must be reversed for the reasons stated in United States v Cothern, 8 USCMA 158, 23 CMR 382, and United States v Soccio, 8 USCMA 477, 24 CMR 287. The record is returned to The Judge Advocate General of the Navy for reference to a board of review. The board, in its discretion, may affirm the lesser offense of absence without leave and reassess the sentence, or it may order a rehearing on the desertion charge.

Chief Judge Quinn concurs.

Latimer, Judge

(dissenting):

I dissent for the reasons set forth in my separate opinion in United States v Soccio, 8 USCMA 477, 24 CMR 287.
(Reap. Dec. 9823)

#### Plywood & Door Manufacturers Corporation *v.*United States

Entry No. 12349, etc.

(Decided October 27, 1960)

*James Wilson Young*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Mollison, Judge:

Counsel for the parties have submitted the appeals for reappraisement enumerated in schedule “A,” attached hereto, upon a stipulation on the basis of which I find that, except for the items of merchandise set forth in schedule “B,” also attached hereto, the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise involved in the said appeals for reappraisement is foreign value, as defined in section 402(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and that such value, in each instance, is the appraised unit value, less 4 per centum, net, packed.

*537Reappraisement No. R58/23110, having been abandoned as to merchandise specified in schedule “B,” it is, to that extent, dismissed.

Judgment will issue accordingly.

Schedule B

Boston entries, reappraisement Nos. R58/23110 etc.

Reappraisement Collector’s Date of

No. No. Entry No. export Appraised

R58/23110 4704 12349 12/19/55 Invoice unit value less ocean freight and insurance.

Shipper: Kaukas Oy., birch plywood as follows:

WG grade, thick, 28%" x *14%"*

*26%" x 14%"*

21)4" x 14%''

20%" x 14%"

*19%"*x *Us/S"*

*Us/4"*x 10 *y4"*
TS-S081UY Attachment 1

Page 1/1

  CBI

   CBI

    

                      CBI
# C_2015245EN.01004901.xml

| 27.7.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 245/49 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.7.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 245/49

---

Action brought on 27 April 2015 — ZZ v Frontex

(Case F-68/15)

(2015/C 245/60)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: S. Pappas, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Agency for the Management of Operational Cooperation at the External Borders of the Member States of the European Union (Frontex)

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the applicant’s appraisal report for 2009 and the claim for damages for the non-material damage allegedly suffered.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the appraisal report of 4 July 2014 notified to the applicant on 12 July 2014, in so far as it amends the initial report; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the appraisal report of 4 July 2014 notified to the applicant on 12 July 2014, in so far as it amends the initial report;

| — | order Frontex to pay the applicant EUR 4  000 by way of damages; |
| --- | --- |

—

order Frontex to pay the applicant EUR 4  000 by way of damages;

| — | order Frontex to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order Frontex to pay the costs.

---
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .

                       UGI UTILITIES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
        COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES - EXHIBIT 12.1
                             (Thousands of dollars)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                     Six
                                                    Months
                                                    Ended                       Year Ended September 30,
                                                   March 31,    ---------------------------------------------------------
                                                     2004           2003           2002           2001           2000
                                                 ------------   ------------   ------------   ------------   ------------
<S>                                              <C>            <C>            <C>            <C>            <C>
EARNINGS:
Earnings before income taxes                     $     78,166   $    100,212   $     73,665   $     79,568   $     82,882
Interest expense                                        8,949         17,412         16,365         18,724         18,135
Amortization of debt discount and expense                 112            244            287            264            218
Estimated interest component of rental expense            704          1,434          1,563          1,541          1,318
                                                 ------------   ------------   ------------   ------------   ------------
                                                 $     87,931   $    119,302   $     91,880   $    100,097   $    102,553
                                                 ============   ============   ============   ============   ============

FIXED CHARGES:
Interest expense                                 $      8,949   $     17,412   $     16,365   $     18,724   $     18,135
Amortization of debt discount and expense                 112            244            287            264            218
Allowance for funds used during
      construction (capitalized interest)                   8              7             19             12             17
Estimated interest component of rental expense            704          1,434          1,563          1,541          1,318
                                                 ------------   ------------   ------------   ------------   ------------
                                                 $      9,773   $     19,097   $     18,234   $     20,541   $     19,688
                                                 ============   ============   ============   ============   ============

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                       9.00           6.25           5.04           4.87           5.21
                                                 ============   ============   ============   ============   ============
</TABLE>