alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 

          - [Docket No. ER07-764-000] 

Take notice that on April 30, 2007, Duke Energy Carolina, LLC filed a First Amended and Restated Agreement with Blue Ridge Electric Membership Corporation, dated April 16, 2007, to become effective May 16, 2007. 

Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. On or before the comment date, it is not necessary to serve motions to intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant. 

                    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and interventions in lieu of paper using the “eFiling” link at                     *http://www.ferc.gov.*                     Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.                 

                    This filing is accessible on-line at                     *http://www.ferc.gov*, using the “eLibrary” link and is available for review in the Commission's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an “eSubscription” link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail                     *FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov*, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.                 

*Comment Date:*                     5 p.m. Eastern Time on May 7, 2007.                 

Philis J. Posey, 

Deputy Secretary. 

 [FR Doc. E7-8537 Filed 5-3-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
# C_2015311EN.01001901.xml

| 21.9.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 311/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.9.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 311/19

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Apelacyjny w Warszawie (Poland) lodged on 17 June 2015 — Edyta Mikołajczyk v Marie Louise Czarnecka, Stefan Czarnecki

(Case C-294/15)

(2015/C 311/23)

Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Referring court

Sąd Apelacyjny w Warszawie

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Edyta Mikołajczyk

Applicant:

Defendants: Marie Louise Czarnecka, Stefan Czarnecki

Defendants:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Are cases relating to annulment of a marriage following the death of one of the spouses within the scope of Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 of 27 November 2003 concerning jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in matrimonial matters and the matters of parental responsibility, repealing Regulation (EC) No 1347/2000 (1)? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Are cases relating to annulment of a marriage following the death of one of the spouses within the scope of Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 of 27 November 2003 concerning jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in matrimonial matters and the matters of parental responsibility, repealing Regulation (EC) No 1347/2000 (1)?

1

| 2. | In the event of an affirmative answer to Question 1, does the scope of that regulation extend to an action for annulment of marriage brought by a person other than one of the spouses? |
| --- | --- |

2.

In the event of an affirmative answer to Question 1, does the scope of that regulation extend to an action for annulment of marriage brought by a person other than one of the spouses?

| 3. | In the event of an affirmative answer to Question 2, in actions for annulment of marriage brought by a person other than one of the spouses, may the jurisdiction of the court be based on the grounds mentioned in the fifth and sixth indents of Article 3(1)(a) of the regulation? |
| --- | --- |

3.

In the event of an affirmative answer to Question 2, in actions for annulment of marriage brought by a person other than one of the spouses, may the jurisdiction of the court be based on the grounds mentioned in the fifth and sixth indents of Article 3(1)(a) of the regulation?

---

(1)  OJ 2003 L 338, p. 1.

1

---
III 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 630 

Allowing the senior Senator from Kentucky to reassign the Henry Clay 

desk when serving as party leader. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 8, 2006 

Mr. MCCONNELL (for himself and Mr. BUNNING) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Allowing the senior Senator from Kentucky to reassign the 

Henry Clay desk when serving as party leader. 

1 Resolved, That S. Res. 89 (106th Congress) is 

2 amended by— 

3 (1) inserting ‘‘(a)’’ after ‘‘That’’; and 

4 (2) adding at the end the following: 

5 ‘‘(b) If, in any Congress, the senior Senator from the 

6 State of Kentucky is serving as party leader, the desk re7 ferred to in subsection (a) may be assigned to the junior 

8 Senator from Kentucky upon the request of the senior 

9 Senator.’’. 

Æ 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
No. 56671.

protest 180728-K (New York).

#### The Buckingham Corporation *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protest.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 5 (Tuesday, January 9, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 966]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-83]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisition of Shares of Bank or 
Bank Holding Companies

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec. [thinsp]225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. 
The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth 
in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the office of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than January 24, 2007.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (Donna J. Ward, Assistant 
Vice President) 925 Grand Avenue, Kansas City, Missouri 64198-0001:
    1. Kris Ann Carson, Mulvane, Kansas; as co-trustee of the Frank L. 
Carson, III Trust No. 1, to retain voting shares of Mulvane Bankshares, 
Inc., and thereby indirectly retain voting shares of Mulvane State 
Bank, both in Mulvane, Kansas.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, January 4, 
2007.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. E7-83 Filed 1-8-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
EXHIBIT 32a

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Twin Disc, Incorporated (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ending March 30, 2007,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as of the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael E. Batten, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and                   
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|   

/s/ MICHAEL E. BATTENMichael E. BattenChairman, President and ChiefExecutive Officer

May 9, 2007

---
No. 50658.

#### Protests 60816-K, etc., of R. Maes Export & Import Corp. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

It was stipulated that the. merchandise is the same in all material respects as that passed upon in *Stephen Rug Mills*v. *United States*(32 C. C. P. A. 110, C. A. D. 293), and by the court’s decision on remand in Abstract 50056. In accordance therewith the protests were sustained as claimed.
# C_2015398EN.01001101.xml

| 30.11.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 398/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.11.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 398/11

---

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 19 June 2015 — Mohammad Makhlouf v Council of the European Union

(Case C-136/15 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - Article 169(2) - Content required in the application initiating an appeal - Manifest inadmissibility))

(2015/C 398/13)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Mohammad Makhlouf (represented by: G. Karouni, avocat)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: Council of the European Union (represented by: G. Étienne and M.-M. Joséphidès, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

| 2. | Mr Mohammad Makhlouf shall bear his own costs and pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Mr Mohammad Makhlouf shall bear his own costs and pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union.

---

(1)  OJ C 311, 21.9.2015.

1

---
EXHIBIT 31.1


I, Douglas D. Cole, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Trinity Learning
     Corporation;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
     a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
     statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
     were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
     report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this report, fairly present in all material
     respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
     the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
     establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
     in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

     a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
          disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
          supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
          registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
          us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
          which this report is being prepared;

     b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
          of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     c)   disclosed in this report any change in internal control over financial
          reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
          quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
          materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
          reporting;

5.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
     our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
     the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
     directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     a)   all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
          operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
          reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
          record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

     b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting.


Date:  December 13, 2004

       /S/ DOUGLAS D. COLE
       -------------------

       Douglas D. Cole
       Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>

                       UGI UTILITIES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
           COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO COMBINED FIXED CHARGES
                  AND PREFERRED STOCK DIVIDENDS - EXHIBIT 12.2
                             (THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                   Nine
                                                  Months
                                                  Ended                  Year Ended September 30,
                                                 June 30,     ---------------------------------------------
                                                   2002         2001         2000         1999        1998
                                                 --------     --------     --------     -------     -------
<S>                                              <C>          <C>          <C>          <C>         <C>
EARNINGS:
Earnings before income taxes                      $69,605     $ 79,568     $ 82,882     $63,139     $57,007
Interest expense                                   12,326       18,724       18,135      17,317      17,383
Amortization of debt discount and expense             219          264          218         215         200
Interest component of rental expense                1,047        1,541        1,318       1,539       1,624
                                                  -------     --------     --------     -------     -------
                                                  $83,197     $100,097     $102,553     $82,210     $76,214
                                                  =======     ========     ========     =======     =======

COMBINED FIXED CHARGES AND PREFERRED
 STOCK DIVIDENDS:
Interest expense                                  $12,326     $ 18,724     $ 18,135     $17,317     $17,383
Amortization of debt discount and expense             219          264          218         215         200
Allowance for funds used during
 construction (capitalized interest)                    7           12           17          36          39
Interest component of rental expense                1,047        1,541        1,318       1,539       1,624
Preferred stock dividend requirements               1,163        1,550        1,550       1,550       2,160
Adjustment required to state preferred stock
 dividend requirements on a pretax basis              758        1,012          995         968       1,304
                                                  -------     --------     --------     -------     -------
                                                  $15,520     $ 23,103     $ 22,233     $21,625     $22,710
                                                  =======     ========     ========     =======     =======
Ratio of earnings to combined fixed charges
 and preferred stock dividends                       5.36         4.33         4.61        3.80        3.36
                                                  =======     ========     ========     =======     =======
</TABLE>
# C_2017195EN.01002002.xml

| 19.6.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 195/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.6.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 195/20

---

Judgment of the General Court of 27 April 2017 — Deere v EUIPO (EXHAUST-GARD)

(Case T-622/15) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Application for the EU word mark EXHAUST-GARD - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptiveness - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009 - Rights of the defence - Article 75 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2017/C 195/27)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Deere & Company (Wilmington, Delaware, United States) (represented initially by N. Weber and T. Heitmann, and subsequently by N. Weber, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: H. Kunz, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 8 September 2015 (Case R 196/2014-4), concerning an application for registration of the word sign EXHAUST-GARD as an EU trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Deere & Company to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Deere & Company to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 7, 11.1.2016.

1

---
<PAGE>
                               VARLEN CORPORATION
                               55 Shuman Boulevard
                              Naperville, IL 60566

                                                April 8, 1999

Mr. Ray Jean
1815 N. Pond Lane
Lake Forest, Ill.  60045

Dear Ray:

      Varlen Corporation (the "Company") recognizes and values your
contributions to its present success and your expected contributions to its
future success. As a result, the Company wishes to provide you with the
following benefits:

      Subject to the effectuation of any amendments to the Company's
      Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (the "SERP") necessary to implement
      this letter agreement, the Company will regard you as having 15 "years of
      service" for purposes of the SERP, and except as provided below will
      regard you as entitled to all benefits to which you would be entitled if
      you were age 62 on the date of this letter, with the result that upon your
      "Termination of Employment," as defined in the SERP, you will be entitled
      to the benefits specified in Section 4.1 of the SERP.

      For purposes of determining your Average Monthly Compensation as defined
      in Article II of the SERP, the phrase "the 120 consecutive month period of
      employment preceding the earlier of the date of the Participant's
      obtaining age 62 " shall mean the 120 consecutive month period of
      employment preceding the earlier of the date the Participant actually
      obtains age 62, without regard to the preceding paragraph of this letter.

            This letter and the SERP represent our agreement and supersede any
prior discussions or agreement on this subject.

                                          Very truly yours,

                                          VARLEN CORPORATION


                                          By: /s/ Greg A. Rosenbaum
Agreed to:


/s/ R. A. Jean      April 27, 1999
----------------
Raymond Jean
F:\netsite-docs\lps93887\CEC TakingStock-Web.pdf
F:\netsite-docs\lps93887\NAPRI_EN.pdf
F:\netsite-docs\lps93887\TS00_Sourcebook_en.pdf
F:\netsite-docs\lps93887\TS00_Summary_en.pdf
F:\netsite-docs\lps93887\TS05_en.pdf
F:\netsite-docs\lps93887\TS03_en.pdf
F:\netsite-docs\lps93887\TS03_Overview_en.pdf
F:\netsite-docs\lps93887\TS2001-Report_en.pdf
F:\netsite-docs\lps93887\TS2002-execsum_en.pdf
F:\netsite-docs\lps93887\TS2002_en.pdf
F:\netsite-docs\lps93887\TS95_EN.pdf
F:\netsite-docs\lps93887\TS96_EN.pdf
F:\netsite-docs\lps93887\TS97_EN.pdf
F:\netsite-docs\lps93887\TS98_Sourcebook_EN.pdf
F:\netsite-docs\lps93887\TS98_Summary_EN.pdf
F:\netsite-docs\lps93887\TS99Sourcebook_EN.pdf
F:\netsite-docs\lps93887\TSSummary99_EN.pdf
ments 

# d txt phata.JPG
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 85 (Thursday, May 3, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 24616]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-8463]



[[Page 24616]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-61,188]


Randstad, Working On-Site At Merrill Lynch, Equity Research; New 
York, NY; Notice of Termination of Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated on March 27, 2007 in response to a worker 
petition filed by a state agency representative on behalf of workers of 
Randstad, working on-site at Merrill Lynch, Equity Research, New York, 
New York.
    The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 23rd day of April 2007.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E7-8463 Filed 5-2-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P