alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Airlines for America" 

September 19, 2016 

Federal Aviation Administration 

U.S. Department ofTransportation 

Docket Management System 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

West Building Ground Floor Room W12-140 

Washington, DC 20590 

I - t :~ '., 

Re: Exemption No. 5549, as amended; Docket No. FAA-2000-8434 

Dear Sir or Madame: 

In accordance with Title 14 ofthe Code ofFederal Regulations (14CFR) § 11.61, Airlines for 

America (A4A), on behalf of its member airlines1

, petitions the Administrator for an extension of 

Exemption No. 5549M (Docket No. F AA-2000-8434 ). This exemption is scheduled to expire on 

January 31, 2017. 

Exemption No. 5549M provides relief from 14 CFR § 121.652(a) and (c) by permitting a pilot in 

command under Part 121 to conduct an instrument approach under certain weather conditions 

during the first 100 hours of service using an alternative means approved by the Administrator 

subject to certain conditions and limitations. 

The conditions and circumstances which warranted the original grant of exemption, in regard to 

public interest and equivalent levels of safety, continue to exist. This petition does not seek to 

change the conditions and limitations of the current exemption. This exemption has been in use 

safely for almost twenty four years. 

The renewal of this exemption is not a controversial issue. For this reason, and the reasons stated 

above, A4A requests that a finding of good cause be made for waiving publication in the Federal 

Register, (14 CFR §11.87). Granting the requested reliefwill set no precedents. The existence of 

the exemption is well known and widely accepted. 

1 Operator Members: Alaska Airlines, American Airlines, Atlas Air, Federal Express. Hawaiian Airlines, JetBlue 

Airways. Southwest Airlines, United Airlines, UPS Airlines. and US Airways. 

Associate Members: Air Canada. 

1275 Pennsylvania Ave, NW Suite 1300 Washington, DC 20004 f 202.626.4000 '.", 'ai"l:nes .org 
Docket No. F AA-2002-8434 Exemption No. 5549 

September 19, 20 16 

Page Two 

A summary of this petition as requjred by 14 CFR §I 1.81 is attached. 

lf any further information or discussion is required, please contact me at 202-626-4285. 

Very truly yours, 

~/h/-< JetTMiller 

Managing Director, Flight Operatjons 

Airlines for America 

1275 Pennsylvania Ave, NW 

Suite 1300 

Washington, D.C. 20004 

(202) 626-4285 

jmiller@airlines.org 

Attachment 
Attachment 

Do ket o. F AA-2000-8434 

eptember 19, 20 16 

SUMMARY OF A4A PETITION 

Petitioner: Airlines for America (A4A) 

Regulation Affected: 

Description of Relief Sought: 

14 CFR 121.652(a) 

14 CFR 12 1.652(c) 

irlines tor America on behalf of it member airline , petitions for an extension of Exemption No. 

5549M. Thi exemption permit a pilot in command under Part 121 to conduct an in tmment 

approach procedure to the weather minima prescribed by this exemption during the fir t I 00 hour 

of service as a pilot in command, in the type of airplane he or she is operating, using an alternative 

means approved by the Admin] trator of satisfying 14 CFR .' J21.652(a) and (c), subject to certain 

cond.itions and limitations.
No. 46938.

#### Protests 721606-G, etc., of Carsch, Inc. (New York).

•Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise in question consists of steel wire in coils the same as that the subject of *Dehler Signoret*v. *United States*(7 Cust. Ct. 103, C. D. 545). In accordance therewith the merchandise was held dutiable at 25 percent under paragraph 316 (a) as wire composed of steel, not specially provided for, as claimed.
# C_2016419EN.01002001.xml

| 14.11.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 419/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.11.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 419/20

---

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 21 September 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Vredegerecht te Ieper — Belgium) — Nationale Maatschappij der Belgische Spoorwegen NV v Gregory Demey

(Case C-261/15) (1)

1

((Rail transport - Regulation (EC) No 1371/2007 - Passengers’ rights and obligations - Absence of a ticket - Failure to regularise within the prescribed period - Criminal offence))

(2016/C 419/25)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Referring court

Vredegerecht te Ieper

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Nationale Maatschappij der Belgische Spoorwegen NV

Applicant:

Defendant: Gregory Demey

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The final sentence of Article 6(2) of Appendix A to the Convention Concerning International Carriage by Rail (COTIF) of 9 May 1980, as modified by the Protocol for the modification of the Convention Concerning International Carriage by Rail of 3 June 1999, in Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 1371/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2007 on rail passengers’ rights and obligations, must be interpreted as not precluding national provisions which lay down that a person making a train journey while not in possession of a ticket for that purpose, who fails to regularise his situation within the periods laid down in those provisions, does not have a contractual relationship with the railway undertaking.

---

(1)  OJ C 270, 17.8.2015.

1

---
**Exhibit 32****CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT**The undersigned officers of **United Components, Inc.**hereby certify pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that: 1. the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of United Components, Inc. for the quarter ended June30, 2005 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of United Components, Inc.Date: August 15, 2005         By: /a/ Bruce M. Zorich          Name:Bruce M. Zorich    Title:Chief Executive Officer  Date: August 15, 2005         By: /s/ Charles T. Dickson          Name:Charles T. Dickson    Title:Chief Financial Officer  The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§. 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether madebefore or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to theCompany and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.
No. 54269.

#### Merchants Wholesale *v.*United States,

protest 131462-K (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

The entry papers disclosed that upon liquidation duty was assessed on 13,427.31 gallons of gin, and that internal revenue tax was assessed upon the basis of only 5,094 gallons. On the record presented it was held *437that the importer is entitled to the refunds claimed by reason of loss of the gin in transit. In accordance with the provisions of paragraph 813, as now in force, the collector was also directed to refund all duties taken upon quantities in excess of the quantities upon which internal revenue taxes were finally assessed.
From: Higgins, Cortney [mailto:Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov] 

Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2014 12:35 PM 

To: Wayland, Robertj 

Subject: RE: Discussion with DOJ on 111(d) and 111(b) mods/recon Comments 

HI Bob, 

Can you let me know who from EPA will be on this call? 

Regards, 

Cortney 

-----Original Appointment----- 

From: Wayland, Robertj [mailto:Wayland.Robertj@epa.gov] 

Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2014 12:45 PM 

To: Wayland, Robertj; Hoffman, Howard; Higgins, Cortney; Tsirigotis, Peter; Culligan, Kevin; 

Johnson, Tanya; Jordan, Scott; Schmidt, Lorie 

Subject: Discussion with DOJ on 111(d) and 111(b) mods/recon Comments 

When: Wednesday, April 23, 2014 10:00 AM-11:00 AM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada). 

Where: 1-866-299-3188, passcode: 919-541-5536 

 

 

Meeting requested by DOJ to discuss their comments on the 111(d) and 111(b) mods/recon 

packages with the Agency. Cortney will keep this meeting small – EPA, DOJ, OMB, OMB counsel 

and WH counsel only. OGC – if I’ve missed any relevant attendees in your office, please feel free 

to invite them or ask me to add them to this scheduler. 

 

If you have any questions/concerns, please give me a call. 

 

thanx! 

 

bob 

 

Robert J. Wayland, Ph.D. 

Leader, Energy Strategies Group 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards 

Sector Policies and Programs Division 

Mail Code D243-01 

Research Triangle Park, NC 27709 

Office: (919) 541-1045 

Cell: (919) 306-2290 

Fax: (919) 541-5450 

 

Email: wayland.robertj@epa.gov 

 

************************************* 

 DRAFT/Deliberative Document - FOIA Exempt 

*************************************
#### United States *v.*General Electric Co.

No. 6042.

Invoices dated Canada, December 10, 1943, etc.

Entered at New Bedford, Mass., January 1, 1944.

Entry No. N-23, etc.

(Decided August 8, 1944)

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General *(Daniel I. Auster,*special attorney), for the plaintiff.

*Johnson, Clapp, Ives & Knight (Henry F. Knight*and *Hervey W, King*of counsel) for the defendant.

Oliver, Presiding Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement have been submitted for decision upon tbe following stipulation of counsel for tbe parties hereto:

> It is hereby stipulated and agreed, by and between counsel for the respective parties hereto, subject to the approval of the court, that the market value, or price, at the time of exportation of the radio parts enumerated below, at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature, and all other costs, charges, and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed, ready for shipment to the United States is, as follows:

> Radio Part No. 112066-lRadio Part No. 112066-2J each $26.12, Canadian currency per thousand, net, packed

> *362It is further stipulated and agreed that there was no higher export value for such or similar merchandise at the time of exportation of the imported merchandise.

> It is further agreed that this case may be submitted on the foregoing stipulation.

On tbe agreed facts I find tbe foreign value, as that valúe is defined in section 402 (c) of tbe Tariff Act of 1930 as amended, to be tbe proper basis for tbe determination of tbe value of tbe merchandise bere involved, and that such values are as follows:

> Radio Part No. 112066-11 Radio Part No. 112066-2J each $26.12, Canadian currency per thousand, net, packed

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
Reap. Dec. 10267.

#### Nisonger Corp. *v.*United States,

reappraisement R60/11312, etc.

Reappraisements abandoned March 27, 1962. Entered at New York, N.Y. (Not published.) (Initial No. 61/11810.) Motion by plaintiff.
# CIVIL AVIATION BUREAU

MINISTRY OF LAND, INFRASTRU CTURE

, TRANSPORT AND TOURISM

2

- 1

- 3, Kasumigaseki, Chiyoda

- ku

Tokyo, 100

- 8918, JAPAN

TEL: +81

- 3

- 5253

- 8703, FAX: +81

- 3

- 5253

- 1656

March 3

, 201 1

Nippon Cargo Airlines Co., Ltd

Business Strategy & International Affairs

First Administration Section

International Air Transport Division

Civil Aviation Bureau

Ministry of Land Infrastructure Transport and Tourism

Approval cases o f 3 rd 

# countries charter operation by USA carriers

A ttached list shows the result of approval cases toward USA carriers ’ application for the 3 rd



# countries charter operation in W2010 season.OperatorDateflightNo.OriginIntermediatepointDestinationA/CtypeNumberof PAXCargo wgh(t)CommodityChartererdate ofapprovalSOUTHERNAIR,INC11/15/2010SOO785CalgaryAnchorageOsakaB747F100Live HorseWILLJILLFARMSINC.2010/11/11SOUTHERNAIR,INC11/16/2010SOO777WhinnipegAnchorageFukuokaB747F100Live HorseCMLCanapanMarketing2010/11/11SOUTHERNAIR,INC11/29/20109S775CalgaryAnchorageKagoshimaB747F90Live HorseFLEWELLINGRANCHES2010/11/22SOUTHERNAIR,INC12/7/20109S783WhinnipegAnchorageOsakaB747F90Live HorseCMLCanapanMarketing2010/12/1SOUTHERNAIR,INC12/8/20109S789CalgaryAnchorageNaritaB747F90Live HorseSCHORNOAGRI‐BUSINESS2010/12/1SOUTHERNAIR,INC1/3/2011SOO577CalgaryAnchorageOsakaB747F90Live HorseWILLJILL FARMS INC.2010/12/27SOUTHERNAIR,INC1/3/2011SOO777WhinnipegAnchorageFukuokaB747F90Live HorseCML Canapan Marketing2010/12/27SOUTHERNAIR,INC1/11/2011SOO775CalgaryAnchorageKagoshimaB747F90Live HorseHEARTLAND LIVESTOCK SERVICES2011/1/5SOUTHERNAIR,INC1/12/2011SOO785CalgaryAnchorageOsakaB747F90Live HorseSCHORNO AGRI-BUSINESS2011/1/5SOUTHERNAIR,INC1/25/2011SOO775CalgaryAnchorageKagoshimaB747F90Live HorseWILLJILL FARMS INC.2011/1/5FedEx1/22/2011FDX9732NaritaAnchorageAnkaraMD11F80Printing MachineryOCE Prinnting System GmbH Germany2011/1/14SOUTHERNAIR,INC2/8/2011SOO775CalgaryAnchoragekagoshimaB747F90Live HorseSCHORNO AGRI-BUSINESS2011/2/2SOUTHERNAIR,INC2/15/2011SOO775CalgaryAnchorageKagoshimaB747F90Live HorseWILLJILL FARMS INC.2011/2/2
# C_2016191EN.01004602.xml

| 30.5.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 191/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.5.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 191/46

---

Order of the General Court of 5 April 2016 — Petro Suisse Intertrade v Council

(Case T-525/15) (1)

1

(2016/C 191/64)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 371, 9.11.2015.

1

---
# C_2016392EN.01003902.xml

| 24.10.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 392/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.10.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 392/39

---

Judgment of the General Court of 14 September 2016 — Lotte v EUIPO — Kuchenmeister (KOALA LAND)

(Case T-479/15) (1)

1

((European Union trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU word mark KOALA LAND - Prior national word mark KOALA - Rejection in part of the application for registration - Likelihood of confusion - Genuine use - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Article 42(2) and (3) of Regulation No 207/2009))

(2016/C 392/51)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Lotte Co. Ltd (Tokyo, Japan) (represented by: M. Knitter and S. Schicker, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Fischer, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Kuchenmeister GmbH (Soest, Germany) (represented by: P. Blumenthal, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 4 June 2015 (Case R 815/2014-1) concerning opposition proceedings between Kuchenmeister and Lotte.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Lotte Co. Ltd to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Lotte Co. Ltd to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 337, 12.10.2015.

1

---
PHANTOM 3

V1.2

2015.06

User Manual

PROFESSIONAL
© 2015 DJI. All Rights Reserved. 53

Appendix

Appendix

Specifcations

Aircraft

Weight (Battery & 

Propellers Included) 1280 g

Max. Ascent Speed 5 m/s

Max. Descent Speed 3 m/s

Max. Speed 16 m/s (ATTI mode, no wind)

Max. Flight Altitude 6000 m

Max. Flight Time Approximately 23 minutes

Operating Temperature 0°C to 40°C

GPS Mode GPS/GLONASS

Gimbal 

Controllable Range Pitch: - 90° to + 30°

Vision Positioning

Velocity Range < 8 m/s (2 m above ground)

Altitude Range 30 cm-300 cm

Operating Range 30 cm-300 cm

Operating Environment Brightly lit (lux > 15) patterned surfaces

Camera

Sensor Sony EXMOR 1/2.3” Effective pixels:12.4 M (total pixels: 12.76 M)

Lens FOV 94° 20mm(35mm format equivalent ) f/2.8

ISO Range 100-3200(video) 100-1600(photo)

Electronic Shutter Speed 8s -1/8000s

Image Max. Size 4000 x 3000

Still Photography Modes

Single shot

Burst shooting: 3/5/7 frames

Auto Exposure Bracketing (AEB): 3/5 

Bracketed frames at 0.7EV Bias

Time-lapse

Supported SD Card Types

Micro SD

Max. capacity: 64 GB. Class 10 or UHS-1 rating required

Video Recording Modes

UHD : 4096x2160p 24/25, 3840x2160p24/25/30 

FHD:1920x1080p 24/25/30/48/50/60 

HD:1280x720p 24/25/30/48/50/60

Max. Bitrate Of Video 

Storage 60 Mbps

Supported File Formats

FAT32/exFAT

Photo: JPEG, DNG

Video: MP4/MOV (MPEG-4 AVC/H.264)

Operating Temperature 

Range

0°C to 40°C
54 © 2015 DJI. All Rights Reserved. 

Appendix

Phantom 3 Professional User Manual

Remote Controller 

Operating Frequency 2.400 GHz-2.483 GHz

Transmitting Distance 2000 m (Outdoor And Unobstructed)

Video Output Port USB

Operating Temperature Range 0°C- 40°C

Battery 6000 mAh LiPo 2S

Mobile Device Holder Tablets and smartphones 

Transmitter Power(EIRP) FCC: 20 dbm; CE:16 dbm

Working Voltage 1.2 A @7.4 V

Charger

Voltage 17.4 V

Rated Power 100 W 

Intelligent Flight Battery ( PH3-4480 mAh-15.2 V )

Capacity 4480 mAh

Voltage 15.2 V

Battery Type LiPo 4S

Energy 68 Wh

Net Weight 365 g

Operating Temperature -10°C- 40°C

Max. Charging Power 100 W

Aircraft Status Indicator Description

Normal

 Red, Green and Yellow Flash 

Alternatively Turning on and Self-Diagnostics

 Green and Yellow Flash Alternatively Aircraft Warming Up

 Green Flashes Slowly Safe to Fly (P-mode with GPS and Vision Positioning)

X2 Green Flashes Twice Safe to Fly (P-mode with Vision Positioning but without GPS)

 Yellow Flashes Slowly Safe to Fly (A-mode but No GPS and Vision Positioning)

Warning

 Fast Yellow Flashing Remote Controller Signal Lost

 Slow Red Flashing Low Battery Warning

 Fast Red Flashing Critical Battery Warning

 Red Flashing Alternatively IMU Error 

— Solid Red Critical Error 

 Red and Yellow Flash Alternatively Compass Calibration Required
# C_2018005EN.01000401.xml

| 8.1.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 5/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.1.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 5/4

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 9 November 2017 — European Commission v TV2/Danmark A/S, Kingdom of Denmark, Viasat Broadcasting UK Ltd

(Case C-656/15 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - State aid - Article 107(1) TFEU - Public broadcasting service - Measures implemented by the Danish authorities in favour of the Danish broadcaster TV2/Danmark - Concept of ‘aid granted by a Member State or through State resources’s))

(2018/C 005/05)

Language of the case: Danish

Parties

Parties

Appellant: European Commission (represented by: B. Stromsky, T. Maxian Rusche and L. Grønfeldt, acting as Agents)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: TV2/Danmark A/S (represented by: O. Koktvedgaard, advokat), Kingdom of Denmark (represented by: C. Thorning, acting as Agent, and by R. Holdgaard, advokat), Viasat Broadcasting UK Ltd (represented by: M. Honoré and S. Kalsmose-Hjelmborg, advokater)

Other parties to the proceedings:

Intervener in support of the applicant: EFTA Surveillance Authority (represented by: C. Zatschler, M. Schneider, Í. Isberg and C. Perrin, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the applicant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Sets aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 24 September 2015, TV2/Danmark v Commission (T-674/11, EU:T:2015:684), to the extent that it annulled Commission Decision 2011/839/EU of 20 April 2011 on the measures implemented by Denmark (C 2/03) for TV2/Danmark in that the European Commission held that the advertising revenue for the years 1995 and 1996 paid to TV2/Danmark through the TV2 Fund constituted State aid; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Sets aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 24 September 2015, TV2/Danmark v Commission (T-674/11, EU:T:2015:684), to the extent that it annulled Commission Decision 2011/839/EU of 20 April 2011 on the measures implemented by Denmark (C 2/03) for TV2/Danmark in that the European Commission held that the advertising revenue for the years 1995 and 1996 paid to TV2/Danmark through the TV2 Fund constituted State aid;

| 2. | Dismisses the action brought by TV2/Danmark A/S seeking the annulment of Decision 2011/839; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the action brought by TV2/Danmark A/S seeking the annulment of Decision 2011/839;

| 3. | Orders TV2/Danmark A/S to bear its own costs and to pay all the costs incurred by the European Commission and Viasat Broadcasting UK Ltd both at first instance and in relation to this appeal; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders TV2/Danmark A/S to bear its own costs and to pay all the costs incurred by the European Commission and Viasat Broadcasting UK Ltd both at first instance and in relation to this appeal;

| 4. | Orders the Kingdom of Denmark and the EFTA Surveillance Authority to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders the Kingdom of Denmark and the EFTA Surveillance Authority to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 48, 8.2.2016.

1

---
APPENDIX M3

UPDATES TO DRAFT EIS NOISE ANALYSIS MAPBOOK
F

igureM-3

UpdatestoDraftEIS

NoiseAnalysisMapbook

Area2:

NorthernVirginia

Sheet1of35

\\cltsmain\GIS

_

DATA\GIS\Projects\011545_VADeptofRails-PublicTransportation\0239056_RAPS-4AltDev-ConceptEng\map_docs\mxd\FEIS\App_M\FEIS_M-3_NoiseVib_Area2_Mapbook_11x17.mxd | Last Updated: 12.03.2018

Projection:LambertConformalConic

StatePlaneVirginiaNorthFIPS4501Feet

NorthAmericanDatumof1983

[

0250500

Feet

Imagery/BasemapSource:2015Bing

AerialImagery;ESRIWorldTransportation

1inch=500feet

@11x17inches

Legend

!

CSXTMileposts

Stations

Track-Existing

ProposedStations

City/CountyBoundary

CSXTROW(CountyParcelData)

§ ̈¦495

§ ̈¦395

§ ̈¦95§ ̈¦66 § ̈¦295

§ ̈¦64

§ ̈¦66 § ̈¦195 § ̈¦95§ ̈¦95 § ̈¦95

[

WWaasshhiinnggttoonn,,DD..CC..

Category1ModerateNoiseImpact

Contour

Category1SevereNoiseImpact

Contour

Category1ModerateNoiseImpacts

Category1SevereNoiseImpacts

Category2ModerateNoiseImpact

Contour

Category2SevereNoiseImpact

Contour

Category2ModerateNoiseImpacts

Category2SevereNoiseImpacts

Category3ModerateNoiseImpact

Contour

Category3SevereNoiseImpact

Contour

Category3ModerateNoiseImpacts

Category3SevereNoiseImpacts

n¤n¤
F

igureM-3

UpdatestoDraftEIS

NoiseAnalysisMapbook

Area6F:

MainStreetand

StaplesMillRoad

FullService

Sheet4of18

\\cltsmain\GIS

_

DATA\GIS\Projects\011545_VADeptofRails-PublicTransportation\0239056_RAPS-4AltDev-ConceptEng\map_docs\mxd\FEIS\App_M\FEIS_M-3_NoiseVib_Area6F_Mapbook_11x17.mxd | Last Updated: 12.05.2018

Projection:LambertConformalConic

StatePlaneVirginiaNorthFIPS4501Feet

NorthAmericanDatumof1983

[

0250500

Feet

Imagery/BasemapSource:2015Bing

AerialImagery;ESRIWorldTransportation

1inch=500feet

@11x17inches

Legend

!

CSXTMileposts

Stations

Track-Existing

ProposedStations

City/CountyBoundary

CSXTROW(CountyParcelData)

§ ̈¦495

§ ̈¦395

§ ̈¦95§ ̈¦66 § ̈¦295

§ ̈¦64

§ ̈¦66 § ̈¦195 § ̈¦95§ ̈¦95 § ̈¦95

[

WWaasshhiinnggttoonn,,DD..CC..

Category1ModerateNoiseImpact

Contour

Category1SevereNoiseImpact

Contour

Category1ModerateNoiseImpacts

Category1SevereNoiseImpacts

Category2ModerateNoiseImpact

Contour

Category2SevereNoiseImpact

Contour

Category2ModerateNoiseImpacts

Category2SevereNoiseImpacts

Category3ModerateNoiseImpact

Contour

Category3SevereNoiseImpact

Contour

Category3ModerateNoiseImpacts

Category3SevereNoiseImpacts

n¤n¤