alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2016200EN.01000201.xml

| 6.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 200/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 200/2

---

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 10 March 2016 — SolarWorld AG v Brandoni solare SpA, Global Sun Ltd, Silicio Solar SAU, Solaria Energia y Medio Ambiente SA, European Commission

(Case C-142/15 P) (1)

1

((Appeals - Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - Article 263 TFEU - Criterion for direct concern - Appeal manifestly unfounded - Dumping - Imports of crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules and key components (cells and wafers) originating in or consigned from China - Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 - Article 8 - Offer of a price undertaking by Chinese exporting producers - Acceptance by the Commission - Exemption of anti-dumping duties - Action against the acceptance decision - Inadmissibility))

(2016/C 200/02)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Appellant: SolarWorld AG (represented by: L. Ruessmann, avocat, and J. Beck, Solicitor)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: Brandoni solare SpA, Global Sun Ltd, Silicio Solar SAU, Solaria Energia y Medio Ambiente SA (represented by: L. Ruessmann, avocat, and J. Beck, Solicitor), European Commission (represented by: J.-F. Brakeland, T. Maxian Rusche and A. Stobiecka-Kuik, acting as Agents)

Other parties to the proceedings:

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

| 2. | SolarWorld AG shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

SolarWorld AG shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 190, 8.6.2015.

1

---
# C_2016111EN.01004302.xml

| 29.3.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 111/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.3.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 111/43

---

Action brought on 13 November 2015 — ZZ and Others v Commission

(Case F-140/15)

(2016/C 111/53)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicants: ZZ and Others (represented by: C. Cortese, lawyer)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Subject matter and description of the proceedings

Subject matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the Commission decision amending the amount of the survivor’s pension granted to the applicant and of the orphans’ pensions granted to the applicant’s three children.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicants claim that the Tribunal should:

| — | annul amendment decision No 3 of the Head of Unit PMO.4 of the European Commission setting out new amounts of the survivor’s pension granted to the complainant and of the orphans’ pensions granted to the complainant’s three children, communicated to the applicant on 6 February 2015, as supplemented by the grounds for the decision rejecting the complaint of the appointing authority of 3 August 2015; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul amendment decision No 3 of the Head of Unit PMO.4 of the European Commission setting out new amounts of the survivor’s pension granted to the complainant and of the orphans’ pensions granted to the complainant’s three children, communicated to the applicant on 6 February 2015, as supplemented by the grounds for the decision rejecting the complaint of the appointing authority of 3 August 2015;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

---
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

JESSICA ALYSE MORENO

,

Appellant,

v.

ZAPP CREDIT SOLUTIONS OF SAN

ANTONIO, LLC, and RUBEN VICTOR

JUAREZ, JR.

,

Appellee s

. §

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 23

- 00288

- CV

Appeal from the

the 57th District Court

of Bexar County, Texas

(TC# 2022

- CI

- 24860)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes the appeal should be

dismissed for want of prosecution. We therefore dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. We

further order Appellant to pay all costs of this appeal and that this decision be certified below for

observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 8 T H DAY OF JANUARY 202 4

.

GINA M. PALAFOX, Justice

Before Alley , C.J., Palafox, and Soto, JJ.
(Reap. Dec. 9822)

#### Carl Fischer Musical Instrument Co., Inc. *v.*United States

Entry Nos. 19901; 38044.

(Decided October 27, 1960)

*Siegel, Mandell & Davidson*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for tbe defendant.

Oliver, Chief Judge:

These two appeals for reappraisement relate to certain musical instruments, represented by the invoice items marked “A” and checked “EDE,” that were exported from Paris, France, and entered at the port of New York.

Stipulated facts, upon which the appeals have been submitted, establish that the proper basis for appraisement of the articles in question, as hereinabove identified, is export value, as defined in section 402(d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, and that such statutory value therefor is the invoice unit values, and I so hold.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
Pursuant to 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that thi s opinion should not * be publishe d and is not precedent except under the limited circu mstance s set forth in 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 .4. 

### INTHE UNI TED S TATESCOU RT OFAPPEALS

FORTHEFIFTH CIRCU IT

N o. 09- 41115 UN I TE D S TA TE S OF AM ERI CA P l ai n t i f f – A pp el l ee v. AN G EL G U AD AL U PE RO JAS- CH AR LE S, D e fe nda nt– Appe l l ant

A pp ealf

rom t h e U n i t ed S t ates D i st ri ctC ou rt f ort he Sout her n D i st r i c tof Texas ( 09- C R - 31) B ef ore G A R Z A , C L E M E N T , an d O W E N , C i rcui tJu dg es . P E R C U R IA M: * I T I S O RD ER ED t hata ppe l l ant ’ s uno ppo s e d m o t i o n t o v acat e t he j u d g me n to f

t h e d i s t r i c tc o u r ti s GRANT ED . I T I S FU RT H E R O R D E R E D t h at appell an t ’ s un opp os e d m o t i o n t or e m and t he c as e t o t he di s t r i c tc o ur tf o rr e c o ns i de r at i o n o f t he s e nt e nc e , i n l i ghto f U SA v . J e f f r i e s , i s GRANT ED . United States Court of App eals Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D Janua ry 28, 2010 Cha rl es R. F ulb ru g e II I Clerk Case: 09-41115 Document: 00511015240 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/28/2010N o. 09- 40115

2 IT IS F U R T H E R O R D E R E D tha t ap p ell a n t’ s u n op p ose dm o tio n to e x p e d i t e t he r uli ngo n m o t i o n t o v a c a t e , e t c . , i s M OO T. I T I S FU RT H ER O RD ER ED t hata ppe l l ant ’ s uno ppo s e d m o t i o n t o i s s ue th e m a n d a te fo r th w ith is GRANT ED . Case: 09-41115 Document: 00511015240 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/28/2010
(Reap. Dec. 9814)

#### Capital Airlines, Inc. Heidl’s, Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 506756.

(Decided October 20, 1960)

*Adair, Ulmer, Murchison, Kent é Ashty*for tbe plaintiffs.

*George Goehr an Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for tbe defendant.

Lawkence, Judge:

The proper dutiable value of an importation consisting of an airplane and parts constitutes the subject of this cause of action.

The case has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of fact:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, subject to tbe approval of tbe Court, that at tbe time of exportation and importation of tbe airplane and parts involved herein, sucb or similar merchandise was not freely sold for export to the United States or in tbe United States in accordance with export value as defined in Section 402(b), or United States value as defined in section 402(c) of tbe Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by tbe Customs Simplification Act of 1956.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that tbe constructed value as defined in Section 402(d) of said act, as so amended, is tbe proper basis for appraisement, and that sucb value is as follows:

> Value of each airplane without engines — English currency £350,000

> Included in sucb value are articles of American origin which are segrega-ble and nondutiable which are marked in red ink on tbe entry papers, B, and articles which are non-segregable and dutiable and which are marked in red ink on tbe entry papers, A, and articles of foreign origin which are dutiable and which are marked in red ink on the entry papers, C.

> Not included in such value are engines bearing numbers:

> 3109 value at £ 11445/0/0

> 6117 value at £ 11568/17/6

> 6248 value at £ 12147/6/4 and

> 6152 value at £ 11684/11/3,

> Plus £ 1300 for each engine for cost of build-up charge.

Upon the record before the court, I find and hold that constructed value, as that value is defined in section 402(d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956 (19 U.S.C. § 1402(d)), is the proper basis of value for the airplane and parts in issue and the said value is as set forth in the above-quoted stipulation of the parties hereto.

*521As to any other merchandise, the appeals are dismissed.

Judgment will issue accordingly.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

AVELINO FONSECA

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 2024

- 0171

[ August 1, 2024 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Barbara Duffy , Judge;

L.T. Case No. 18

- 008618 CF10A

.

Avelino Fonseca, South Bay, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

W ARNER

, C IKLIN and C ONNER

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
No. 65712.

#### Hammel, Riglander & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 60/15425 (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of saws, not specially provided for, valued at not over 5 cents each, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 84 (Wednesday, May 2, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 24272]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-8368]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

National Agricultural Statistics Service


Notice of the Advisory Committee on Agriculture Statistics 
Meeting

AGENCY: National Agricultural Statistics Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, the 
National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS) announces a meeting of 
the Advisory Committee on Agriculture Statistics.

DATES: The Committee meeting will be held from 1 p.m. to 4:30 p.m. on 
Wednesday, May 2, 2007, and from 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. on Thursday, May 
3, 2007. There will be an opportunity for public questions and comments 
at 1:40 p.m. on May 3, 2007.

ADDRESSES: The Committee meeting will take place at the Hyatt Regency 
Crystal City Hotel at Reagan National Airport, 2799 Jefferson Davis 
Highway, Arlington, Virginia 22202. Written comments may be filed 
before or within a reasonable time after the meeting with the contact 
person identified herein at: U.S. Department of Agriculture, National 
Agricultural Statistics Service, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Room 
5041A, South Building, Washington, DC 20250-2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joe Reilly, Executive Director, 
Advisory Committee on Agriculture Statistics, Telephone: 202-720-4333, 
Fax: 202-720-9013, or e-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#fc968e9995909085bc929d8f8fd2898f989dd29b938a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="ff958d9a96939386bf919e8c8cd18a8c9b9ed1989089">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Advisory Committee on Agriculture 
Statistics, which consists of 25 members appointed from 7 categories 
covering a broad range of agricultural disciplines and interests, has 
scheduled a meeting on May 2-3, 2007. During this time the Advisory 
Committee will discuss topics including Plans for the 2007 Census of 
Agriculture, Subcommittee reports on Energy, and Equine, Census Follow-
on Surveys, Data User Access on Data Enclave and Data Lab's, and Annual 
Program Priorities.
    The Committee meeting is open to the public. The public may file 
written comments to the USDA Advisory Committee contact person before 
or within a reasonable time after the meeting. All statements will 
become a part of the official records of the USDA Advisory Committee on 
Agriculture Statistics and will be kept on file for public review in 
the office of the Executive Director, Advisory Committee on Agriculture 
Statistics, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC 20250.

    Dated April 11, 2007, at Washington, DC.
R. Ronald Bosecker,
Administrator, National Agricultural Statistics Service.
[FR Doc. E7-8368 Filed 5-1-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-20-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# C_2018301EN.01003201.xml

| 27.8.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 301/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.8.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 301/32

---

Order of the General Court of 28 June 2018 — Romania v Commission

(Case T-478/15) (1)

((Actions for annulment - European Union’s own resources - Financial responsibility of the Member States - Obligation to pay the Commission the amount corresponding to a loss of own resources - Letter from the Commission - Act not open to challenge - Inadmissibility))

(2018/C 301/42)

Language of the case: Romanian

Parties

Applicant: Romania (represented initially by R.-H. Radu, A. Buzoianu and E. Gane, subsequently by R.-H. Radu, E. Gane, A. Wellman and M. Chicu, acting as Agents)

Defendant: European Commission (represented initially by A. Caeiros and A. Ştefănuc, subsequently by A. Caeiros and G.-D. Balan, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of the decision of the Directorate-General for Budget of the Commission which is contained in the letter with reference Ares (2015) 2453089 of 11 June 2015 by which the latter ordered Romania to provide it with the gross amount of EUR 1 079 513,09, from which 25 % should be deducted for collection costs, corresponding to a loss of traditional own resources, at the latest on the first working day following the nineteenth day of the second month following the dispatch of that letter, at the risk of having to pay default interest pursuant to Article 11 of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1150/2000 of 22 May 2000 implementing Decision 94/728/EC, Euratom on the system of the Communities’ own resources (OJ 2000 L 130, p. 1).

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed.

| 2. | There is no need to rule on the Slovak Republic’s application to intervene. |
| --- | --- |

2.

There is no need to rule on the Slovak Republic’s application to intervene.

| 3. | Romania is ordered to bear its own costs and to pay those by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Romania is ordered to bear its own costs and to pay those by the European Commission.

| 4. | Romania, the Commission and the Slovak Republic shall each bear their own costs relating to the latter’s application to intervene. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Romania, the Commission and the Slovak Republic shall each bear their own costs relating to the latter’s application to intervene.

---

(1)  OJ C 346, 19.10.2015.

---
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 82 (Monday, April 30, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21265-21266]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-8248]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Disease, Disability, and Injury Prevention and Control Special 
Emphasis Panel (SEP): Epidemiological Studies of Epilepsy, Potential 
Extramural Project 2007-R-05

    Correction: This notice was published in the Federal Register on 
April 9, 2007, Volume 72, Number 67, page 17555. The meeting was 
originally scheduled as a teleconference. In lieu of a

[[Page 21266]]

teleconference, the SEP will now convene at the Doubletree Hotel, 3342 
Peachtree Road, NE., Atlanta, GA 30326.
    Date and Time: 8:30 a.m.-3 p.m., May 10, 2007.
    Contact Person for More Information: Juliana Cyril, M.P.H., PhD, 
Associate Director for Policy and Peer Review, CDC, 1600 Clifton Road, 
NE., Mailstop D-72, Atlanta, GA 30333, Telephone (404) 639-3098.
    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining to 
announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, 
for both CDC and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

    Dated: April 25, 2007.
Elaine L. Baker,
Acting Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for 
Disease Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. E7-8248 Filed 4-27-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
# Fourth Court of Appea ls San Antonio, Texas

October 11, 2021

No. 04

- 21

- 00171

- CV

Leticia RODRIGUEZ Appellant / Cross

- Appellee

v.
Lydia RODRIGUEZ and Robert Pereida Appellees / Cross

- Appellants

From the 224th Judicial District Court
, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 20 17CI19456 Honorable Cynthia Marie Chapa , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

On September 20, 2021
, appellee/cross

- appellant Robert Pereida ’s counsel, Sergio R. Davila and Olga G. Brown, filed a motion to withdraw as counsel for appellee/cross

- appellant Robert Pereida. The motion complies with the requirements of Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 6.5, and it has been on file for more than ten days. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 6.5(a), (b); id. R. 10.3(a). Neither appellant/cross

- appellee Leticia Rodriguez nor appellee s /cross

- appellant s Lydia Rodriguez and Robert Pereida have filed any objection or other response to the motion.
After consideration, the motion to withdraw is GRANTED. We ORDER Sergio R. Davila and Olga G. Brown to “immediately notify [appell ee/cross

- appellant Robert Pereida ], in writing, of any deadlines or settings that the attorney knows about at the time of wit hdrawal but that were not previously disclosed to” appellee/cross

- appellant Robert Pereida and to file a copy of that notice with the clerk of this court. Id. R. 6.5(c)

. Appellee/c ross

- appellant Robert Pereida’s brief is now due. If appellee/ cross

- appellant Robert Pereida wishes to file a motion for extension of time, he must do so with in 10 days of th e date of this order. If appellee/cross

- appellant Robert Pereida fails to file his brief or a motion for extension of time within 10 days of th e date of this order, we will dismiss his cross

- appeal for want of prosecution and we will set the case at issue without his appellee’s brief. See i d. R. 38.8(a); see also id. R. 42.3(c)._________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

IN WITNES S WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 11th day of October, 2021

.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ
, Clerk of Court
January 22, 1971

No. 71-2

#### In the matter of the Petition of Stephen M. Whalen, A1C, U. S. Air Force.

ORDERED:

That said Petition be, and the same is hereby, dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See United States v Snyder, 18 USCMA 480, 40 CMR 192 (1969).
Exhibit 35.8



|     |  |                                                                                                          
|---- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|LOGO |  | Commercial Mortgage Servicing D1050-084, 8th Fl 401 South Tryon Street
Charlotte, NC 28202 1-800-326-1334

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

Reference is hereby made to that certain Trust and Servicing Agreement dated as of February 6, 2016, by and among CITIGROUP COMMERCIAL
MORTGAGE SECURITIES INC., as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Servicer, TRIMONT REAL ESTATE ADVISORS, LLC, as Special Servicer, WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee and CITIBANK, N.A., as Certificate Administrator
with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2016-225L (the Agreement). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

Pursuant to Section 13.7 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify
that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period from January 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017 (the Reporting Period), and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has
been made under my supervision, and
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2018.



|                        
|------------------------
|LOGO                    
|Daniel Bober            
|Executive Vice President
|Wells Fargo Bank        



|                       |  |     
|---------------------- |  | ----
|Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |  | LOGO
# C_2016232EN.01001901.xml

| 27.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 232/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 232/19

---

Judgment of the General Court of 13 May 2016 — Market Watch v EUIPO — Glaxo Group (MITOCHRON)

(Case T-312/15) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU word mark MITOCHRON - Earlier national word mark MIVACRON - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009))

(2016/C 232/25)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Market Watch Franchise & Consulting, Inc. (Freeport, Bahamas) (represented by: J. Korab, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: S. Bonne, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervening before the General Court: Glaxo Group Ltd (Brentford, United Kingdom) (represented by S. Malynicz, Barrister, and A. Smith, Solicitor)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervening before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 20 March 2015 (Case R 507/2014-2), relating to opposition proceedings between Glaxo Group Ltd and Market Watch Franchise & Consulting, Inc.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Market Watch Franchise & Consulting, Inc. to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Market Watch Franchise & Consulting, Inc. to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 270, 17.8.2015.

1

---