alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit
      32.2**











Certification
      of CFO Pursuant to


18
      U.S.C.
      Section 1350,


As
      Adopted Pursuant to


Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002











In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of U.S. Energy Corp. (the "Company") on
      Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Robert Scott Lorimer,
      Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.














/s/
                Robert Scott LorimerRobert
                Scott Lorimer,Chief
                Financial OfficerMay
                15, 2007








This
      certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
      purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
      amended.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      U.S. Energy Corp. and will be retained by U.S. Energy Corp. and furnished to
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
No. 46363.

#### Protest 22092-K of Ti Hang Lung & Co. (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain of the items are similar to the merchandise passed upon in *Wing Duck*v. *United States*(6 Cust. Ct. 133, C. D. 446), and *Columbia Co.*v. *United States*(5 id. 175, C. D. 395) it was found that the Liquor Taxing Act of 1934 is not applicable thereto. The protest was therefore sustained as to the items in question.
July 7 , 2015

M r. Gregory B. Mays

2220 Swamp Fox Rd.

M i dlothian, VA 23112

Dear Mr. Mays :

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not process your

request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can No t Process Your Request

We entered your June 26 th 2015, exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA

- 2015

-

2468 ), but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does

no t comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request

any further, you mus t send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would

benefit the public as a whole.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do No t Hear From You

If we d o not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267

- 9677.

Sincerely,

B rittany Newton

Program Analyst, Ai rmen and

Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
# C_2018042EN.01001401.xml

| 5.2.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 42/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.2.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 42/14

---

Judgment of the General Court of 13 December 2017 — Crédit mutuel Arkéa v ECB

(Case T-712/15) (1)

1

((Economic and monetary policy - Prudential supervision of credit institutions - Article 4(3) of Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 - Prudential supervision at the consolidated level - Group subject to prudential supervision - Institutions permanently affiliated to a central body - Article 2(21)(c) of Regulation (EU) No 468/2014 - Article 10 of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 - Capital requirements - Article 16(1)(c) and (2)(a) of Regulation No 1024/2013))

(2018/C 042/19)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Crédit mutuel Arkéa (Le Relecq Kerhuon, France) (represented by: H. Savoie and P. Mele, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Central Bank (ECB) (represented by: K, Lackhoff, R. Bax and C. Olivier, acting as Agents, and D. Martin, M. Pittie and M. Françon, lawyers)

Defendant:

Intervener in support of the defendant: European Commission (represented by: V. Di Bucci and K.-P. Wojcik, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application based on Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of Decision ECB/SSM/2015 — 9695000CG 7B84NLR5984/28 of the ECB of 4 October 2015 setting out the prudential requirements for the Crédit Mutuel group.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Crédit mutual Arkéa to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Central Bank (ECB). |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Crédit mutual Arkéa to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Central Bank (ECB).

| 3. | Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 59, 15.2.2016.

1

---
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v EUGENE G. GRAAN, Private, U. S. Marine Corps, Appellant

18 USCMA 586, 40 CMR 298

No. 22,183

September 19, 1969

*Lieutenant Norman A. Wulf,*JAGC, USNR, was on the pleadings for Appellant, Accused.

*Captain William S. Foss,*USMCR, was on the pleadings for Appellee, United States.

Opinion of the Court

Darden, Judge:

The scrutiny given the providence of the appellant’s plea of guilty to the offenses charged is not so dif*587ferent from that found in United States v Care, 18 USCMA 535, 40 CMR 247, as to require a different result. While the law officer did not announce each element of desertion, he did, on the other hand, draw from Graan the acknowledgment that defense counsel had explained each separate element. However, the procedure followed in this case would not meet the standard that must apply to cases tried thirty days after the decision in United States v Care, supra.

Accordingly, the decision of the board of review is affirmed.

Chief Judge Quinn concurs.

FERGUSON, Judge:

I dissent. See my dissent in United States v Care, 18 USCMA 535, 40 CMR 247.
# C_2017382EN.01003902.xml

| 13.11.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 382/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.11.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 382/39

---

Judgment of the General Court of (Fourth Chamber) of 27 September 2017 — BelTechExport v Council

(Case T-765/15) (1)

1

((Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures against Belarus - Freezing of funds - Suspension of measures - Obligation to state reasons - Rights of defence - Right to be heard - Error of assessment))

(2017/C 382/47)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: BelTechExport ZAO (Minsk, Belarus) (represented by: J. Jerņeva and E. Koškins, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: F. Naert and J.-P. Hix, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Intervener in support of the defendant: European Commission (represented by: E. Paasivirta and L. Havas, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application pursuant to Article 263 TFEU for annulment of Council Decision (CFSP) 2015/1957 of 29 October 2015 amending Decision 2012/642/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Belarus (OJ 2015 L 284, p. 149), and of Council Regulation (EU) 2015/1948 of 29 October 2015 amending Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 concerning restrictive measures against Belarus (OJ 2015 L 284, p. 62), in so far as they concern the applicant.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders BelTechExport ZAO to bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders BelTechExport ZAO to bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union;

| 3. | Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 68, 22.2.2016.

1

---
Case No. 13,332.

#### STEAM CUTTER CO. v. WINDSOR MANUF'G CO.

[Cited in Steam Cutter Co. v. Sheldon, Case No. 13,331. Nowhere reported; opinion not now accessible.]
# C_2016191EN.01005001.xml

| 30.5.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 191/50 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.5.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 191/50

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 12 April 2016 — CP v Parliament

(Case F-98/15) (1)

1

((Civil Service - Officials - Head of unit - Trial period - Not confirmed in the post of Head of unit - Enforcement of a judgment for annulment - Loss of opportunity))

(2016/C 191/72)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: CP (represented by: L. Levi and A. Tymen, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: V. Montebello-Demogeot and O. Caisou-Rousseau, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Annulment of the decision of 18 July 2014, which, following the judgment of the Tribunal in Case F-8/13, CP v European Parliament, of 26 March 2014, confirmed the applicant in his post as Head of unit, in so far as that decision does not provide for retroactive recognition of the status of Head of unit and the retroactive award of the increase in basic salary for his post (the management allowance), and the claim for damages for the material and non-material damage allegedly suffered.

CP

European Parliament

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Orders the European Parliament to pay CP the sum of EUR 3 219,55. Default interest calculated at the rate fixed by the European Central Bank for its main refinancing operations and applicable to the material period, increased by two points, to run from 1 July 2011 until the date of actual payment, shall be added to that sum; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Orders the European Parliament to pay CP the sum of EUR 3 219,55. Default interest calculated at the rate fixed by the European Central Bank for its main refinancing operations and applicable to the material period, increased by two points, to run from 1 July 2011 until the date of actual payment, shall be added to that sum;

| 2. | Dismisses the remainder of the action; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the remainder of the action;

| 3. | Orders each party to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders each party to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 294, 7.9.2015, p. 86.

1

---
(Reap. Dec. 9002)

Entry No. 710914.

#### Bluefries New York, Inc. *v.*United States

(Decided October 11, 1957)

*John D. Bode*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Mollison, Judge:

This appeal for. reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon stipulation of counsel for the parties that — ■

> 1. The merchandise involved consists of varnish exported from Holland.

> 2. The market value or price at the time of exportation of such merchandise to the United States at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of Holland in the usual wholesale quantity and in the ordinary course of trade for exportation to the United States including the cost of containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States was the appraised value less the amounts listed on the invoice for consular fee, insurance, ocean freight, import duties, customs clearance, transportation and delivery and collection.

> 3. There was no higher foreign value for such or similar merchandise at the time of exportation thereof.

Accepting the foregoing stipulation as establishing the facts therein recited, I find that export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such value was the appraised value, less the amounts listed on the invoice for consular fee, insurance, ocean freight, import duties, customs clearance, transportation and delivery, and collection.

Judgment will issue accordingly.
**Exhibit
      15**




May
        3,
        2007
 
 Securities
        and
        Exchange Commission
 100
        F Street,
        N.E.
 Washington,
        DC
        20549
 
 Commissioners:
 
 We
        are aware that our report dated May 3, 2007 on our review of interim financial
        information of UniSource Energy Corporation (the "Company") for
        the three
        month **** periods **** ended
        March 31,
        2007 and 2006 and
        included in the
        Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007
        is
        incorporated by reference in the Company’s Registration Statements on Form S-8
        (Nos.333-43765, 333-43767, 333-43769, 333-53309, 333-53333, 333-53337,
        333-99317, and 333-140353) and on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-31043, 333-93769,
        333-103392, and 333-126141).
 
 Very
        truly
        yours,
  /s/
        PricewaterhouseCoopers
        LLP
  PricewaterhouseCoopers
        LLP
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site.(Historical purposes)
**Title:****Partnership [electronicresource].**
 
2007: Spring | Summer | Winter
2008: Spring | Summer | Fall
 
SuDoc:PE 1.14:
Item Number:0074-E-05 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000628452
 
October 23, 2017
1 

### Kelly, Shaheerah

From: Saanii <dinetahdoo@yahoo.com>

Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2015 8:40 AM

To: Kelly, Shaheerah

Subject: Re: the Flare Report, Aneth, Utah

Good morning Shaheerah,

We got the report back from the editor and are in the midst of inserting a few items. Should have the report sent to you

via email today for review.

Rena Martin

Dinetahdoo Cultural Resources Management, LLC P.O. Box 2012, Farmington NM 87499

10076 US Hwy 371, S of Farmington, NM

Phone (505) 960

‐ 9478Fax (505) 960

‐ 9749

Email dinetahdoo@yahoo.com

Website: www.dinetahdoo.com

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐

On Thu, 1/8/15, Kelly, Shaheerah <Kelly.Shaheerah@epa.gov> wrote:

Subject: FW: Mailing address for Shaheerah Kelly

To: "dinetahdoo@yahoo.com" <dinetahdoo@yahoo.com>

Date: Thursday, January 8, 2015, 1:15 PM

#yiv2913200300

#yiv2913200300

‐‐

_filtered #yiv2913200300 {panose

‐ 1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}

_filtered #yiv2913200300 {font

‐ family:Calibri;panose

‐ 1:2 15

5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}

_filtered #yiv2913200300 {font

‐ family:Verdana;panose

‐ 1:2 11

6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}

#yiv2913200300

#yiv2913200300 p.yiv2913200300MsoNormal, #yiv2913200300 li.yiv2913200300MsoNormal, #yiv2913200300

div.yiv2913200300MsoNormal {margin:0in;margin

‐ bottom:.0001pt;font

‐ size:11.0pt;}

#yiv2913200300 a:link, #yiv2913200300

span.yiv2913200300MsoHyperlink

{color:#0563C1;text

‐ decoration:underline;}

#yiv2913200300 a:visited, #yiv2913200300 span.yiv2913200300MsoHyperlinkFollowed

{color:#954F72;text

‐ decoration:underline;}

#yiv2913200300 span.yiv2913200300EmailStyle17 {color:windowtext;}

#yiv2913200300 span.yiv2913200300EmailStyle18 {color:#1F497D;}

#yiv2913200300 .yiv2913200300MsoChpDefault {font

‐ size:10.0pt;}

_filtered #yiv2913200300 {margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}

#yiv2913200300 div.yiv2913200300WordSection1 {}

#yiv29132003002 Rena,

Thank you for talking with me and for

all the information. It would be helpful if you could let Terry Knight at Ute Mountain know about our efforts to contact

his office.

Feel free to contact me.

Thanks.

************************************

Shaheerah Kelly

Permits Office, Air Division

(AIR

‐ 3)

U.S. Environmental Protection

Agency, Region 9

San Francisco, CA 94105

Phone: 415

‐ 947

‐ 4156

Fax: 415

‐ 947

‐ 3579

Email: kelly.shaheerah@epa.gov

From: Kelly,

Shaheerah

Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2015 11:36 AM

To: 'dinetahdoo@yahoo.com'

Subject: Mailing address for Shaheerah Kelly

Hi Rena,

Below is my contact

information, including my mailing address.

************************************

Shaheerah Kelly

Permits Office, Air Division

(AIR

‐ 3)3 U.S. Environmental Protection

Agency, Region 9

San Francisco, CA 94105

Phone: 415

‐ 947

‐ 4156

Fax: 415

‐ 947

‐ 3579

Email: kelly.shaheerah@epa.gov
EXHIBIT 32.1



             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
               SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Trinity Learning Corporation (the "Company")
Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Douglas D. Cole, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
          or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
          and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of
          operations of the Company.


Date:     May 14, 2004
                                   /S/ DOUGLAS D. COLE
                                   ----------------------------------
                                   Douglas D. Cole
                                   Chief Executive Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Trinity Learning Corporation and will be retained by it
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
Exhibit 32
 
 Certification Pursuant to Section 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 
 Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsection (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Canal Capital Corporation and Subsidiaries, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify that:
 
 The Quarterly Report of Form 10-Q for the six months ended April 30, 2010 (the “Form 10-Q”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 Date: June 14, 2010
/S/ Michael E. SchultzChief Executive OfficerDate: June 14, 2010
/S/ Reginald SchauderChief Financial Officer
No. 39075.

#### Protest 394422-G of Tailored Women, Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

The record showed that certain of the articles are in ■chief value of cellulose filaments similar to those involved in Abstract 37230. The claim at 60 percent under paragraph 31 was therefore sustained.
No. 48076.

#### Protests 499123-G, etc., of John H. Tice, Jr., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of *Caradine*v. *United States*(9 Cust. Ct. 69, C. D. 664) the protests were sustained.
No. 50675.

#### Protests 93178-K, etc., of Schroeder Bros., Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

At the trial it was stipulated that the reliquidation of the entries herein involved is similar in all material respects to that in *Bel Paese Sales Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(15 Cust. Ct. 7, C. D. 932). In accordance with stipulation and following the decision cited, judgment was entered directing the collector to reliquidate the entries herein, refunding the duty established to have been taken in excess, in accordance with the decision and judgment in Abstract 45156.
# C_2016475EN.01001501.xml

| 19.12.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 475/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.12.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 475/15

---

Order of the President of the Court of 23 September 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Constanţa — Romania) — Dinu Antoci v Instituția Prefectului — județul Constanța — Serviciul Public Comunitar Regim Permise de Conducere și Înmatriculare a Vehiculelor

(Case C-236/15) (1)

1

(2016/C 475/23)

Language of the case: Romanian

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 270, 17.8.2015.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated balance sheet and consolidated statement of operations for the
quarter ended March 31, 1999 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                       2,869,786
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  186,815
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    175,802
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,675,080
<PP&E>                                       9,344,400
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,028,553
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              24,994,361
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,066,319
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        32,494
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                24,994,361
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               423,051
<CGS>                                           32,655
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   32,655
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,113,755
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (723,359)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (723,359)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.22)
        

</TABLE>