alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2015354EN.01005502.xml

| 26.10.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 354/55 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 354/55

---

Action brought on 31 July 2015 — ZZ v Commission

(Case F-111/15)

(2015/C 354/66)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: J.-N. Louis and N. Montigny, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the Commission’s decision to refuse the applicant and his spouse reimbursement of the costs concerning three invoices for medical treatment and treatment relating to the cancer from which she is suffering.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision refusing reimbursement of itemised accounts 67, 68 and 72 concerning the healthcare expenses incurred by the applicant’s spouse; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision refusing reimbursement of itemised accounts 67, 68 and 72 concerning the healthcare expenses incurred by the applicant’s spouse;

| — | Order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Commission to pay the costs.

---
#### M. M. Dupouey *v.*United States

No. 7598.

Entry No. 1416.

Invoice dated Merida, Mexico, February 12, 1947.

Certified February 13, 1947.

Entered at New Orleans, La., February 21, 1947.

(Decided June 9, 1948)

*Wallace & Schwartz (Joseph Schwartz*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Johnson, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between counsel for the plaintiff and the Assistant Attorney General for the United States:

> (1) That the merchandise in suit consists of sisal twine from Mexico, invoiced as follows:

> *Marks and numbers Description*0/ *merchandise Invoiced per pound U.S.S*

> D. H. S. LBS.

> 1570 Unclipped-•6 bales 30/10, 2/300 — 1, 905 ^ d

> 1570 Unclipped-20 bales 1/300 — 1, 002

> 1494 Undipped-463 bales 30/5, 1/300 — 62, 866 t — 1

> 1494 Unelipped-19 . bales 30/10, 1/300 — 5, 842 r — t

> 1494 Clipped - 64 bales 30/5, 1/300 — 9, 555 r — i

> 1494 Clipped —8 bales 60/5, 1/300 — 2, 431 i-H

> 1462 Clipped ■28 reels 2/400 — 1, 400 t-H

> 1307 Clipped 51. coils 2/500 — 5, 996 . t — 1

> (2) That the said merchandise was entered at the invoiced prices less non-dutiable charges marked .“XX” on the invoice.

> (3) That the invoiced unit values for the said merchandise as above stated, less nondurable charges marked “XX” on the invoice, represent the prices at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers, *459at time of exportation of said merchandise, in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature, and all other costs, charges, and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States.

> (4) That there was no higher foreign value for the said merchandise.

> (5) That this case is hereby submitted for decision upon this stipulation.

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values were the invoiced unit values, less the nondutiable charges marked “XX” on the invoice.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
# C_2017277EN.01000501.xml

| 21.8.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 277/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.8.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 277/5

---

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 15 June 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos vyriausiasis administracinis teismas — Lithuania) — Proceedings brought by ‘Agrodetalė’ UAB

(Case C-513/15) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Internal market - EC type-approval - Directive 2003/37/EC - Scope - Agricultural or forestry tractors - Placement on the market and registration in the European Union of used or second-hand vehicles imported from a third country - Concepts of ‘new vehicle’ and ‘entry into service’))

(2017/C 277/05)

Language of the case: Lithuanian

Referring court

Referring court

Lietuvos vyriausiasis administracinis teismas

Party to the main proceedings

Party to the main proceedings

‘Agrodetalė’ UAB

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

| 1. | Directive 2003/37/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 May 2003 on type-approval of agricultural or forestry tractors, their trailers and interchangeable towed machinery, together with their systems, components and separate technical units and repealing Directive 74/150/EEC, as amended by Commission Directive 2014/44/EU of 18 March 2014, must be interpreted as meaning that the first placing on the market and the registration in a Member State of used or second-hand tractors imported from a third country are subject to compliance with the technical requirements laid down by that directive. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Directive 2003/37/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 May 2003 on type-approval of agricultural or forestry tractors, their trailers and interchangeable towed machinery, together with their systems, components and separate technical units and repealing Directive 74/150/EEC, as amended by Commission Directive 2014/44/EU of 18 March 2014, must be interpreted as meaning that the first placing on the market and the registration in a Member State of used or second-hand tractors imported from a third country are subject to compliance with the technical requirements laid down by that directive.

| 2. | Article 23(1)(b) of Directive 2003/37, as amended by Directive 2014/44, must be interpreted as meaning that the provisions of that directive apply to second-hand vehicles coming under categories T1, T2 and T3 and imported into the European Union from a third country, where they are entered into service in the European Union for the first time on or after 1 July 2009. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Article 23(1)(b) of Directive 2003/37, as amended by Directive 2014/44, must be interpreted as meaning that the provisions of that directive apply to second-hand vehicles coming under categories T1, T2 and T3 and imported into the European Union from a third country, where they are entered into service in the European Union for the first time on or after 1 July 2009.

---

(1)  OJ C 414, 14.12.2015.

1

---
EXHIBIT  32.1



                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with  the  Trinity  Learning  Corporation  (the  "Company")
Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2005 as filed
with  the  Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I,  Richard  J. Marino, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant
to  18  U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that,  to  the  best  of  my  knowledge:

1.     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Act  of  1934,  as  amended;  and

2.     The  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results of operations of the Company.


Date:     February  14,  2005

     /S/  RICHARD  J.  MARINO
     ------------------------
     Richard  J.  Marino
     Chief  Executive  Officer





A  signed  original  of  this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided  to  Trinity  Learning  Corporation  and  will  be  retained  by it and
furnished  to  the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

June 11, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

136631 Michael F. Cavanagh 

& (9) Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, ROSE BOGAERT, Justices Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 136631 

 COA: 285826 
 SECRETARY OF STATE and 

WAYNE COUNTY BOARD OF 

ELECTIONS COMMISSIONERS, 

 Defendants-Appellees, 

and 

ANDREW DILLON,

 Intervening Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. 

The application for leave to appeal is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

l0611 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

June 11, 2008 

Clerk
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed August 19, 2015.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D14-2805

Lower Tribunal No. 14-3208

________________

Responsible Vendors, Inc.,

Appellant,

vs.

Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission,

Appellee.

An appeal from the Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission. 

Roetzel & Andress and Vijay G. Brijbasi (Ft. Lauderdale), for appellant. 

Amanda L. Neff, Executive Senior Attorney, for appellee. 

Before SUAREZ, C.J., and EMAS and LOGUE, JJ. 

SUAREZ, C.J.

Responsible Vendors, Inc. appeals from an order of the Reemployment

Assistance Appeals Commission affirming the award of unemployment benefits to
the former employee, Ava J. De Oliveira-Zappia. We affirm. See Frazier v. Home

Shopping Club LP, 784 So. 2d 1190, 1191 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001) (holding that

misbehavior serious enough to warrant an employee's dismissal is not necessarily

serious enough to sustain a forfeiture of unemployment compensation benefits). In

order to support a denial of benefits, “misconduct connected with work” is not

mere inefficiency, unsatisfactory conduct, failure in good performance as the result

of an inability or incapacity, inadvertence, good faith errors in judgment or

discretion, or ordinary negligence in isolated instances. Id. Rather, the employer

must prove that the employee behaved intentionally or with a degree of

carelessness or negligence that manifests a wrongful intent or evil design, or

otherwise acted in a way that would constitute misconduct as defined in section

443.036(29), Florida Statutes (2015). Id. at 1192. See also Yost v. Unemployment

Appeals Comm'n, 848 So. 2d 1235, 1238 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003) (same); Del Pino v.

Arrow Air, Inc., 920 So. 2d 772, 773 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006) (confirming that cases

dealing with isolated incidents, such as failure to follow policies or rules, are not

generally considered “misconduct” that would result in denial of unemployment

benefits); Arroyo v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 60 So. 3d 492, 494. 

(Fla. 3d DCA 2011) (“While we agree that on this record [Claimaint’s] termination

from her job was justified, we cannot agree that this conduct constitutes

misconduct that would disqualify her from receiving benefits.”).

Affirmed.
# C_2016175EN.01001602.xml

| 17.5.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 175/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.5.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 175/16

---

Order of the President of the General Court of 29 February 2016 — ICA Laboratories and Others v Commission

(Case T-732/15 R)

((Application for interim measures - Environment - Consumer protection - Regulation fixing maximum residue levels for guazatine - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - No urgency))

(2016/C 175/19)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicants: ICA Laboratories Close Corp. (Century City, South Africa); ICA International Chemicals (Proprietary) Ltd (Century City); and ICA Developments (Proprietary) Ltd (Century City) (represented by: K. Van Maldegem, R. Crespi, lawyers, and P. Sellar, Solicitor)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: X. Lewis and P. Ondrůšek, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for suspension of the operation of Commission Regulation (EU) 2015/1910 of 21 October 2015 amending Annexes III and V to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards maximum residue levels for guazatine in or on certain products (OJ 2015 L 280, p. 2).

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim measures is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim measures is dismissed.

| 2. | The costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The costs are reserved.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 186 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 186

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 25, 2007

 Received and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Honoring the 75th anniversary of Brookgreen Gardens in Murrells Inlet, 
                            South Carolina.

Whereas 2007 is the 75th year that Brookgreen Gardens is open to the public;
Whereas in 1930 philanthropist Archer M. Huntington and his wife, sculptor Anna 
        Hyatt Huntington, purchased 9,100 acres of South Carolina land that 
        stretched from the Waccamaw River to the Atlantic Ocean;
Whereas within the tract of such land were the remnants of four rice 
        plantations, including the Oaks, Springfield, Laurel Hill, and 
        Brookgreen;
Whereas the Huntingtons created Brookgreen Gardens on a 300-acre parcel of land 
        with massive live oak trees which were planted nearly two centuries 
        earlier;
Whereas in 1932 the Huntingtons opened Brookgreen Gardens to the public and 
        established it as both a nature preserve and a showcase for American 
        figurative sculpture;
Whereas Brookgreen Gardens consists of two main components: the Huntington 
        Sculpture Garden and the Lowcountry History and Wildlife Preserve;
Whereas more than 550 works by hundreds of American artists are displayed in the 
        Huntington Sculpture Garden;
Whereas the Lowcountry History and Wildlife Preserve is rich with evidence of 
        the great rice plantations of the 1800s, contains native and domestic 
        animal exhibits, and is the only zoo accredited by the Association of 
        Zoos and Aquariums on the coast of either North Carolina or South 
        Carolina; and
Whereas Brookgreen Gardens is designated a National Historic Landmark by the 
        National Park Service: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That Congress honors Brookgreen Gardens in Murrells Inlet, South 
Carolina, on its 75th anniversary of being open to the public.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 24, 2007.

            Attest:

                                            LORRAINE C. MILLER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board

          - [Docket 4-2007]

The comment period for the application for subzone status at the MPM Silicones, LLC facility in Waterford, New York, submitted by the Capital District Regional Planning Commission (72 FR 6518, 2/12/07), is being extended to June 6, 2007 to allow interested parties time to comment on new information to be submitted to the FTZ Board in response to questions stemming from the April 18, 2007, hearing held in this case. Rebuttal comments may be submitted during the subsequent 15-day period, until June 21, 2007. Submissions (original and 3 copies) shall be addressed to the Board's Executive Secretary at: Foreign-Trade Zones Board, U.S. Department of Commerce, Room 2814B, 1401 Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20230.

For further information, contact Elizabeth Whiteman at Elizabeth_Whiteman@ita.doc.gov or (202) 482-0473.

Dated: April 24, 2007.

Andrew McGilvray,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. E7-8372 Filed 5-1-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S
Before the Second Division,

November 9, 1945

No. 50647.

#### Protests 988746-G, etc., of Trinacria Importing Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as that passed upon in *Stephen Rug Mills*v. *United States*(32 C. C. P. A. 110, C. A. D. 293), and by the court’s decision on remand in Abstract 50056. In accordance therewith the protests were sustained as claimed.
# C_2016200EN.01002301.xml

| 6.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 200/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 200/23

---

Order of the General Court of 19 April 2016 — Portugal v Commission

(Case T-550/15) (1)

1

((Action for annulment - EAGF and EAFRD - Period within which proceedings must be commenced - Point from which time starts to run - Delay - Inadmissibility))

(2016/C 200/33)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Portuguese Republic (represented by: L. Inez Fernandes, M. Figueiredo, P. Estêvão and J. Saraiva de Almeida, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: P. Guerra e Andrade and A. Sauka, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action for annulment of Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/1119 of 22 June 2015 excluding from European Union financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD (OJ 2015 L 182, p. 39) in so far as that decision excludes certain expenditure incurred by the Portuguese Republic.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

The Court hereby orders:

| 1. | The action is dismissed as being inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as being inadmissible.

| 2. | The Portuguese Republic shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The Portuguese Republic shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 389, 23.11.2015.

1

---
No. 44223.

#### Protest 936174-G of Philip Lien (New York).

Opinion by

Brown, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is bodies, hoods, forms, or shapes similar to those the subject of *Cohn*v. *United States*(4 Cust. Ct. 166, C. D. 314). The protest was therefore sustained.
No. 47600.

#### Protests 847386-G, etc., of Andes Fruit & Produce Corp. et al. (New York).

*422Opinion by

Cline, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Commercial Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084, 8th Fl  401 South Tryon Street  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|--------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

Reference is hereby made tothat certain Trust and Servicing Agreement dated as of February 6, 2016, by andamong CITIGROUP COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES INC., as Depositor, WELLS FARGOBANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Servicer, TRIMONT REAL ESTATE ADVISORS, LLC, asSpecial Servicer, WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee andCITIBANK, N.A., as Certificate Administrator with respect to CommercialMortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2016-225L (the"Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise definedshall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 13.7 ofthis Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of CommercialMortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1.            A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period from February 6,2016 through December 31, 2016 (the “Reporting Period”), and of itsperformance per the Agreement during such period has been made under mysupervision, and 

 

2.            To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer hasfulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respectsthroughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, theundersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2017.

 

/s/ Daniel Bober

Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President

Wells Fargo Bank

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll  go far |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------|
|  EXHIBIT 32.2                                    |
|-------------------------------------------------------|
|  Union Carbide Corporation and      Subsidiaries |
|                                                  |

| 1. | the      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Corporation for the quarter ended      September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission      (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;  and |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Corporation. |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/      EUDIO GIL                                                           |   |   |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
| Eudio      GilVice      President, Treasurer andChief      Financial Officer |   |   |
| Date:      October 30, 2009                                                  |   |   |

----