alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

HARMINDER SINGH, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney 

General, 

Respondent.

No. 15-71620 

Agency No. A088-347-459 

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted May 17, 2022

**

Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

Harminder Singh, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the 

Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen 

removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for 

abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen. Cano-Merida v. INS, 311 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

MAY 20 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 15-71620 

F.3d 960, 964 (9th Cir. 2002). We deny the petition for review.

We previously denied Singh’s petition for review of the agency’s decision 

that he was not eligible for asylum, withholding of removal, or protection under the 

Convention Against Torture. Singh v. Holder, 586 F. App’x 269 (9th Cir. 2014) 

(unpublished). We now conclude that the BIA did not abuse its discretion by 

denying Singh’s untimely motion to reopen. As the BIA determined, Singh did not 

introduce previously unavailable, material evidence, and no exception to the filing 

deadline for his motion to reopen otherwise applies. 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(c)(7)(C); 8 

C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(1); Young Sun Shin v. Mukasey, 547 F.3d 1019, 1025 (9th Cir. 

2008) (applicants seeking to “reopen proceedings to pursue relief bear a ‘heavy 

burden’ of proving that, if proceedings were reopened, the new evidence would 

likely change the result in the case”) (quoting Matter of Coelho, 20 I. & N. Dec. 

464, 473 (BIA 1992)).

The record does not support Singh’s contention that the BIA failed to 

consider the evidence he submitted with his motion to reopen or otherwise violated 

his right to due process. See Feng Gui Lin v. Holder, 588 F.3d 981, 987 (9th Cir. 

2009) (“[A]lthough the BIA must consider a petitioner’s evidence of changed 

country conditions, it need not expressly refute on the record every single piece of 

evidence.”).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
Record of Discussion 

Docket No. FAA- Directorate Identifier: -AD 

With whom outside the FAA has this AD action been discussed (i.e., Design Approval Holder, 

manufacturer, ATA, NBAA, RAA, AOPA, ALPA, GAMA, etc)? 

ORGANIZATION PERSON CONTACTED DATE TOPICS DISCUSSED 

Boeing Norm Black 3/ 10/ 14 No response. 

A4A Bob Ireland 3/10/14 No response. 

Other/Additional Information: Emailed both individuals listed above about releasing SB 767-

27 A0229 Original issue.
# C_2016118EN.01000201.xml

| 4.4.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 118/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.4.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 118/2

---

Appeal brought on 21 July 2015 by Shoe Branding Europe BVBA against the judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) delivered on 21 May 2015 in Case T-145/14: adidas AG/Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

(Case C-396/15 P)

(2016/C 118/02)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Shoe Branding Europe BVBA (represented by: J. Løje, lawyer)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: adidas AG, Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Other parties to the proceedings:

By order of 17 February 2016 the Court of Justice (Sixth Chamber) held that the appeal was inadmissible.

---
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

January 30, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

129515 Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL Stephen J. Markman, QUALITY, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 129515 COA: 261258 Ingham CC: 04-000818-CE SOUTH HURON VALLEY UTILITY AUTHORITY, Defendant-Appellee,

and

CITY OF FLAT ROCK, Intervening D efendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 11, 2005 order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1 ), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REMAND th is case to the Court of Appeals for consideration as on leave granted.

t0123 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

January 30, 2006

Clerk
Exhibit 4.1



 


Advisors Asset Management, Inc.

18925 Base Camp Road

Monument, Colorado 80132


April 22, 2022


 


Advisors Disciplined Trust 2035


c/o The Bank of New York Mellon, as Trustee


240 Greenwich Street, 22W Floor


New York, NY 10286


 


Re: Advisors Disciplined Trust 2035 (the “Fund”)


Ladies and Gentlemen:


We have examined the Registration
Statement File No. 333-239037 for the above captioned Fund. We hereby consent to the use in the Registration Statement of the references
to Advisors Asset Management, Inc. as evaluator.


You are hereby authorized
to file a copy of this letter with the Securities and Exchange Commission.


 





	 	Very truly yours,
	 	 	 
	 	Advisors Asset Management, Inc.
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	By	/s/ ALEX R. MEITZNER
	 	 	Alex R. Meitzner
	 	 	Senior Vice President
# C_2016222EN.01003701.xml

| 20.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 222/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 222/37

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 28 April 2016 — FY v Council

(Case F-76/15) (1)

((Civil service - Social security - Joint Sickness Insurance Scheme - Reimbursement of medical expenses - Reimbursement rate - Recognition of a serious illness - Criteria - Article 72 of the Staff Regulations and the General Implementing Provisions for the reimbursement of medical expenses))

(2016/C 222/47)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: FY (represented by: J.-N. Louis and N. de Montigny, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bauer and M. Veiga, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of the decision of the Brussels Settlements Office rejecting the application for extension of the recognition of the illness suffered by the applicant’s son as a serious illness and for the medical expenses connected therewith to be reimbursed at 100 %.

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1) | Annuls the decision of 8 April 2014 of the Brussels (Belgium) Settlements Office for the Joint Sickness Insurance Scheme rejecting the application for extension of the recognition, as a serious illness, of the illness suffered by FY’s son; |
| --- | --- |

1)

Annuls the decision of 8 April 2014 of the Brussels (Belgium) Settlements Office for the Joint Sickness Insurance Scheme rejecting the application for extension of the recognition, as a serious illness, of the illness suffered by FY’s son;

| 2) | Orders the Council of the European Union to bear its own costs and is ordered to pay the costs incurred by FY. |
| --- | --- |

2)

Orders the Council of the European Union to bear its own costs and is ordered to pay the costs incurred by FY.

---

(1)  OJ C 245, 27/7/2015, p. 51.

---
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 81 (Friday, April 27, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 21013]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-8044]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices, Acquisition of Shares of Bank or 
Bank Holding Companies; Correction

    This notice corrects a notice (FR Doc. E7-2770) published on page 
7656 of the issue for Friday, February 16, 2007.
    Under the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago heading, the entry for 
Randall R. Schwartz, Orland Park, Illinois; Susan M. Schwartz, Orland 
Park, Illinois; Richard H. Schwartz, Lemont, Illinois; Esther V. 
Schwartz, Lemont, Illinois; Clarence J. Ludwig, Sarasota, Florida; Mary 
Lou Ludwig, Sarasota, Florida; William D. Ludwig, Lincoln, Nebraska, 
Linda S. Macaskill, Sarasota, Florida; and John D. Macaskill, Sarasota, 
Florida, is revised to read as follows:
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (Burl Thornton, Assistant Vice 
President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414:
    1. Randall R. Schwartz, the Susan M. Schwartz Trust, Orland Park, 
Illinois; Susan M. Schwartz as trustee of the Susan M. Schwartz Trust; 
Richard H. Schwartz and Esther V. Schwartz, both of Lemont, Illinois; 
the Clarence J. Ludwig Trust, Sarasota, Florida; Clarence J. Ludwig as 
trustee of the Clarence J. Ludwig Trust, the Mary Lou Ludwig Trust, 
Sarasota, Florida; Mary Lou Ludwig as trustee of the Mary Lou Ludwig 
Trust, the William D. Ludwig Trust, Lincoln, Nebraska; William D. 
Ludwig as trustee of the William D. Ludwig Trust, Linda S. Macaskill, 
the John D. Macaskill Revocable Trust, Sarasota, Florida; and John D. 
Macaskill as trustee of the John D. Macaskill Revocable Trust; to 
retain voting shares of First Personal Financial Corp., Orland Park, 
Illinois, and thereby indirectly retain voting shares of First Personal 
Bank, Orland Park, Illinois.
    Comments on this application must be received by May 7, 2007.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, April 23, 
2007.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. E7-8044 Filed 4-26-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>                     <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   6-MOS                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>          DEC-31-1999        DEC-31-1999       DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>               JUN-30-1999        JUN-30-1999       DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                             0             572,183         1,183,218
<SECURITIES>                       0                   0                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                      0             159,543           159,543
<ALLOWANCES>                       0                   0                 0
<INVENTORY>                        0                   0                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                   0           7,785,771         6,615,391
<PP&E>                             0                   0                 0
<DEPRECIATION>                     0                   0                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     0           8,517,497         7,958,152
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>              0             101,168           173,223
<BONDS>                            0                   0                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>              0                   0                 0
<PREFERRED>                        0                   0                 0
<COMMON>                           0                   0                 0
<OTHER-SE>                         0           8,416,329         7,784,929
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>       0           8,517,497         7,958,152
<SALES>                            0                   0                 0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>             346,622             690,208                 0
<CGS>                              0                   0                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                      0                   0                 0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              33,013              58,808                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                   0                   0                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 0                   0                 0
<INCOME-PRETAX>              313,609             631,400                 0
<INCOME-TAX>                       0                   0                 0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                0                   0                 0
<DISCONTINUED>                     0                   0                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                    0                   0                 0
<CHANGES>                          0                   0                 0
<NET-INCOME>                 313,609             631,400                 0
<EPS-BASIC>                      0                   0                 0
<EPS-DILUTED>                      0                   0                 0


</TABLE>
May 24,2012 

My name is joel Gay. I am the communications director for the New Mexico Wildlife Federation, 

which represents thousands of conservation-minded New Mexico hunters, anglers and others who 

care about wildlife and habitat. 

I am also an avid hunter and fisherman myself. I am here today to ask the Environmental Protection 

Agency to protect our nation's wildlife habitat by standing up for clean air and clean water that our wild 

game requires to thrive 

Hunters and anglers in this country have always promoted the protection of our wildlife resources. A 

century ago it was sportsmen like Aldo Leopold, founder of the New Mexico Wildlife Federation, who 

called for conservative harvest limits on fish and game, no more commercial harvest of game birds and 

animals, and strong law enforcement to protect game species like antelope, elk and turkey that had been 

extirpated in New Mexico and other states. Thanks to those far-sighted sportsmen, our game populations 

have recovered and in some cases are booming. 

Today the threat to our wildlife is not from overharvesting, but from overheating. 

The science is irrefutable that as the climate changes due to increasing levels of greenhouse gases, 

average temperatures will rise and precipitation will be increasingly erratic. Those two factors work 

together to affect wildlife and, by extension, sportsmen. 

Last week I went fishing on Columbine Creek in northern New Mexico, hoping to find native Rio Grande 

cutthroat trout. In many states, the trout streams are big enough that trout can find deep pools of cold 

water to help them survive as temperatures rise. But in New Mexico we often fish in streams like the 

Columbine that are less than a foot deep. If temperatures continue to rise, trout and trout fishing on many 

streams in New Mexico will simply disappear. 

Earlier this spring I hunted for turkeys in the Sacramento Mountains in southeast New Mexico. They had 

record snowfall early in the winter, followed by drought and an early runoff. There was almost no water 

in canyons and almost no birds. Wildlife in our region can withstand flood and drought, but climate 

change is creating even bigger swings in precipitation that make the future of hunting for birds like turkey 

and quail questionable. 

Likewise, big game animals that thrive in so-called "sky islands" of the southwest and that can't migrate 

north, will have nowhere to go as temperatures rise. Many hunters already see the effect of a warming 

planet as waterfowl migrations and the rut seasons for elk, deer and other ungulates occur later than they 

have historically. 

I'm asking the EPA to take quick action to update the nation's pollution standards for new power plants 

and to begin to rein in pollution from existing power plants. We need the EPA to protect our air and 

water, which ultimately will protect our wildlife and in tum protect our outdoor heritage from the worst 

effects of warming world. 

Sincerely, 

Joel Gay 

Albuquerque, New Mexico
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Union
Carbide Corporation's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 1999, and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000100790
<NAME> UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                              33
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      997
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        571
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  1874
<PP&E>                                            8509
<DEPRECIATION>                                    4290
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    7292
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             1440
<BONDS>                                           1796
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           156
<OTHER-SE>                                        2265
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      7292
<SALES>                                           1402
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  1402
<CGS>                                             1042
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     1042
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   141<F1>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  31
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    138
<INCOME-TAX>                                        34
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 71
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                           20
<NET-INCOME>                                        51
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.39<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.38<F2>
<FN>
<F1>Other expenses are equal to research and development of 37 and depreciation and
amortization of 104.
<F2>The EPS-PRIMARY amount represents basic earnings per share and the EPS-DILUTED
amount represents diluted earnings per share, computed in accordance with
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 128, "Earnings Per Share."
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 232 

It is the Sense of the Congress that the confidentiality mandates for minors 

should be removed from family planning services programs operating 

under title X of the Public Health Services Act and Medicaid. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 10, 2007 

Mr. MARCHANT submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

It is the Sense of the Congress that the confidentiality mandates for minors should be removed from family planning 

services programs operating under title X of the Public 

Health Services Act and Medicaid. 

Whereas title X of the Public Health Service Act, established 

by Congress, was designed to assist in making comprehensive voluntary family planning services readily 

available to all persons desiring such service; 

Whereas these services, including the availability of contraception, were extended to minors under the age of 16 as 

a result of the United States Supreme Court decision in 

Carey v. Population Services International; consequently, 

title X clinics can provide minors with free contraceptives 

without a parent’s knowledge or consent; 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•HCON 232 IH 

Whereas Medicaid funding for family planning was authorized to cover health care services for low-income women 

through a cooperative Federal-State program; 

Whereas in Texas, any provider receiving title X funds from 

the State must also provide services to Medicaid-eligible 

clients and the State cannot require minors to obtain parental consent before receiving family planning services 

including contraception; 

Whereas these requirements effectively force the State to provide contraceptives to children under the age of 16 in 

order to finance critical family planning services and reduce the likelihood of parental involvement at a time in 

a child’s sexual development when emotional capacity is 

not likely to correspond to physical maturity; and 

Whereas family planning programs operating under title V 

and title XX of the Social Security Act are not prohibited 

from requiring parental consent for the dispensation of 

prescriptions, devaluing the implication that confidentiality is a necessity and sending a mixed message to 

State administrators of family planning programs: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that the con3 fidentiality mandates for minors should be removed from 

4 family planning services programs operating under title X 

5 of the Public Health Services Act and Medicaid. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
CIVIL AVIATION BUREAU

MINISTRY OF LAND, INFRASTRUCTURE, 

TRANSPORT AND TOURISM

2-1-3, Kasumigaseki, Chiyoda-ku

Tokyo, 100-8918, JAPAN

TEL: +81-3-5253-8703, FAX: +81-3-5253-1656

March 3, 2011

Nippon Cargo Airlines Co., Ltd

Business Strategy & International Affairs

First Administration Section

International Air Transport Division

Civil Aviation Bureau

Ministry of Land Infrastructure Transport and Tourism

Approval cases of 3rd countries charter operation by USA carriers

Attached list shows the result of approval cases toward USA carriers’ application for the 3rd

countries charter operation in W2010 season.
Operator

Date flight 

No. Origin

Intermediate 

point Destination

A/C 

type

Number of PAX

Cargo wgh 

(t) Commodity 

SOUTHERN AIR,INC 11/15/2010 SOO785 Calgary Anchorage Osaka B747F 100 Live Horse WILLJILL FARMS INSOUTHERN AIR,INC 11/16/2010 SOO777 Whinnipeg Anchorage Fukuoka B747F 100 Live Horse CML Canapan Mar

SOUTHERN AIR,INC 11/29/2010 9S775 Calgary Anchorage Kagoshima B747F 90 Live Horse FLEWELLING RANCSOUTHERN AIR,INC 12/7/2010 9S783 Whinnipeg Anchorage Osaka B747F 90 Live Horse CML Canapan Mar

SOUTHERN AIR,INC 12/8/2010 9S789 Calgary Anchorage Narita B747F 90 Live Horse SCHORNO AGRI‐B

SOUTHERN AIR,INC 1/3/2011 SOO577 Calgary Anchorage Osaka B747F 90 Live Horse WILLJILL FARMS SOUTHERN AIR,INC 1/3/2011 SOO777 Whinnipeg Anchorage Fukuoka B747F 90 Live Horse CML Canapan MarSOUTHERN AIR,INC 1/11/2011 SOO775 Calgary Anchorage Kagoshima B747F 90 Live Horse HEARTLAND LIVESSOUTHERN AIR,INC 1/12/2011 SOO785 Calgary Anchorage Osaka B747F 90 Live Horse SCHORNO AGRI-BUSOUTHERN AIR,INC 1/25/2011 SOO775 Calgary Anchorage Kagoshima B747F 90 Live Horse WILLJILL FARMS FedEx 1/22/2011 FDX9732 Narita Anchorage Ankara MD11F 80 Printing Machinery OCE Prinnting SSOUTHERN AIR,INC 2/8/2011 SOO775 Calgary Anchorage kagoshima B747F 90 Live Horse SCHORNO AGRI-BU

SOUTHERN AIR,INC 2/15/2011 SOO775 Calgary Anchorage Kagoshima B747F 90 Live Horse WILLJILL FARMS
No. 48756.

#### Protests 932088-G, etc., of D. Costalos et al., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

It was stipulated that the cheese in question is similar to that the subject of *Scaramelli*v. *United States*(9 Cust. Ct. 270, C. D. 706) and Abstracts 39667 and 42146. The protests were therefore sustained.