alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 583 

Designating September 2006 as ‘‘National Youth Court Month’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 25, 2006 

Mr. STEVENS (for himself, Ms. MURKOWSKI, Mr. AKAKA, Mr. DEWINE, Mr. 

FEINGOLD, Mr. DOMENICI, and Mr. CHAMBLISS) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating September 2006 as ‘‘National Youth Court 

Month’’. 

Whereas a strong country begins with strong communities in 

which all citizens play an active role and invest in the 

success and future of the youth of the United States; 

Whereas the fifth National Youth Court Month celebrates the 

outstanding achievement of youth courts throughout the 

country; 

Whereas in 2005, more than 110,000 youths volunteered to 

hear more than 115,000 juvenile cases, and more than 

20,000 adults volunteered to facilitate peer justice in 

youth court programs; 

Whereas 1,158 youth court programs in 49 States and the 

District of Columbia provide restorative justice for juveVerDate Aug 31 2005 06:15 Sep 26, 2006 Jkt 049196 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6300 E:\BILLS\SR583.ATS SR583

jcorcoran on PRODPC62 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 583 ATS 

nile offenders, resulting in effective crime prevention, 

early intervention and education for all youth participants, and enhanced public safety throughout the United 

States; 

Whereas, by holding juvenile offenders accountable, reconciling victims, communities, juvenile offenders, and their 

families, and reducing caseloads for the juvenile justice 

system, youth courts address offenses that might otherwise go unaddressed until the offending behavior escalates and redirects the efforts of juvenile offenders toward becoming contributing members of their communities; 

Whereas Federal, State, and local governments, corporations, 

foundations, service organizations, educational institutions, juvenile justice agencies, and individual adults support youth courts because youth court programs actively 

promote and contribute to building successful, productive 

lives and futures for the youth of the United States; 

Whereas a fundamental correlation exists between youth service and lifelong adult commitment to and involvement in 

one’s community; 

Whereas volunteer service and related service learning opportunities enable young people to build character and develop and enhance life-skills, such as responsibility, decision-making, time management, teamwork, public speaking, and leadership, which prospective employers will 

value; and 

Whereas participating in youth court programs encourages 

youth court members to become valuable members of 

their communities: Now, therefore, be it 


jcorcoran on PRODPC62 with BILLS
3 

•SRES 583 ATS 

1 Resolved, That the Senate designates September 

2 2006 as ‘‘National Youth Court Month’’. 

Æ 


jcorcoran on PRODPC62 with BILLS
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





TWL
      CORPORATION





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of TWL Corporation (the "Company") on
      Form
      10-QSB/A for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Dennis J. Cagan,
      Chief
      Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as
      adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
      the
      best of my knowledge:





1.
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
                and





2.
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.








Date:  May
      24,
      2007








/s/*Dennis
                J. Cagan*Dennis
                J. CaganChief
                Executive Officer





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      TWL Corporation and will be retained by it and furnished to the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
No. 56166.

protests 158152-K, etc. (New York).

#### Russell Uniform Co. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

The protests were dismissed.
# C_2016419EN.01002201.xml

| 14.11.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 419/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.11.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 419/22

---

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 22 September 2016 — Pensa Pharma SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office, Ferring BV, Farmaceutisk Laboratorium Ferring A/S

(Case C-442/15 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - EU trade mark - Word mark PENSA PHARMA - Figurative mark pensa - Applications for a declaration of invalidity of the holders of the word marks pentasa - Declaration of invalidity - Proceedings before EUIPO - Change in the subject matter of the proceedings - New plea before the General Court))

(2016/C 419/28)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Pensa Pharma SA (represented by: R. Kunze and G. Würtenberger, Rechtsanwälte)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo, acting as Agent), Ferring BV, Farmaceutisk Laboratorium Ferring A/S (represented by: I. Fowler, Solicitor, and D. Slopek, Rechtsanwalt)

Other party to the proceedings:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders Pensa Pharma SA to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Pensa Pharma SA to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 414, 14.12.2015.

1

---
. 

. :. 

OFFICE.OF THE Al-TORN& GENERAL OF TEXAS 

. 

Oplnlon 1%. O-7202 

lb; Authqrity of the 

oomittee to 

. 
33’7 
. . 33% 

. . 

. . sfaney J. ?!?I-OYSI - ?a.Te 3 

j - 

; 

2% the aeue of Kauffman b, Parker, 99 3. Y$. (2d) 1074, 

,Y,oxwt hod. beTom it a almilar c@stion to .&he one presented 

,% par re@ast e I% Quote the follovrin[; lnnfgage Smm acid cas0a . 

*The money n>en aolleated and placed in &e hands 

of the-appellants (the cor&&ttee) beoaqe a trust $jxGi, 

and oould-only be disbursed and paid out OS' provIdod by 

statute; cczt3id.y it oould not be spent by the ohdir .. 

, ? pan of the oxccutive comzltteo; thcsc ribp’ellants, (the 

. . cotittse) To? sslarl& and servloco performed by the 

aball%Wsn, nor oould it be spent for unmoessary expemes, 

~bat must be spent for the purposes intended by the statute 

i 

‘end anOor the pxtxisions of the statutes aut.hor3.zinz'such 

expe~ditures.*l (Parenthesis ours) 

1 

i Eonoy bollaoted'under the pmvisions of ArtioLe 33100 to de- 

; f.nytht3 ox~enssa Of'th9 prirrcry oannOt,be spat roz itens got within 

;:,parvlrra of said Articl.0. Seer mall 0. Parker, 119 8. -6. (2d) 

. 

. . 

IWare tinablo to find ary pixwisfoni iit& statuie allow- .. : 

!:s the nedera of the oounty oxooutivo cotittee sny fees for attend- - 

1-2 a meet5.ag.of sald,+%mi.ttee. ~Ybnr Question should., t&r&ora~, be 

~ssmrcd in the deCjative and it is so Enstiered. 

#. By y 

&.:.: ..’ ‘, 

John ‘Reeves 

-. 

. 

. .
EXHIBIT 99.2
                                                                    ------------


                         CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906
                                     OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Unico American
Corporation (the "Company") for the period ended September 30, 2002, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission as of the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Lester A. Aaron, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
    the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



                    /s/  Lester A. Aaron
                    --------------------
           Name:    Lester A. Aaron
           Title:   Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
           Date:    November 12, 2002



This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
**
**Exhibit 32.2**

**Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to**

**18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**as Adopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection with Amendment to the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Adient plc for the year ended September 30,2018, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Douglas G. Del Grosso, Chief Executive Officer of Adient plc, and Jeffrey M. Stafeil, as Chief Financial Officer of Adient plc, each herebycertifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that: 

1.The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

2. The information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Adient plc. 

 
Adient plcBy: 
/s/ Douglas G. Del Grosso
 Douglas G. Del Grosso President and Chief Executive OfficerDate: June 24, 2019By: 
/s/ Jeffrey M. Stafeil
 Jeffrey M. Stafeil Executive Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerDate: June 24, 2019
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Adient plc and will beretained by Adient plc and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 
**
Exhibit 35.4  LOGO Annual Statement as to Compliance For the Year Ended December 31, 2018 Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc., Series 2016-GC37 Pursuant
to Section 3.01 (32) of the Subservicing Agreement governing the referenced transaction (the Servicing Agreement), I hereby attest that:  i.
A review of the activities and performance of Berkadia as Subservicer during the period has been made under my
supervision.  ii.
To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, Berkadia as Subservicer has fulfilled, in all material
respects, its obligations under this Subservicing Agreement throughout the period and no default by the Subservicer under the Subservicing Agreement has occurred and is continuing.  Berkadia,LOGOMark E. McCoolPresidentFebruary 10, 2019 Inv. 823 Lib. A
**Exhibit 10 f**

**FISK BUILDING ASSOCIATES L.L.C.**

**c/o Malkin Holdings LLC**

**One Grand Central Place**

**60 East 42nd Street**

**New York, New York 10165**

as of January 1, 2010

VIA REGISTERED MAIL

RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED

250 West 57th St. Associates L.L.C.

c/o Malkin Holdings LLC

One Grand Central Place

60 East 42nd Street

New York, New York 10165

Re: 

Lease dated September 30, 1953 between 250 West 57th St. Associates L.L.C. (then known as 250 West 57th St. Associates), as landlord, and Fisk Building Associates L.L.C. (then known as Fisk Building Associates), as tenant, as modified by agreements dated June 12, 1961, June 10, 1965, May 1, 1975, November 12, 1985, September 1, 1999, November 17, 2000, August 27, 2004, March 10, 2008 and July 10, 2008 (as so modified, the “Lease”)

Gentlemen:

Pursuant to the provisions of that certain consent solicitation dated April 25, 1985, the Agents representing the Participants in 250 West 57th St. Associates L.L.C. (“Landlord”) were authorized to grant Fisk Building Associates L.L.C. (“Tenant”), as tenant under the Lease, up to four (4) additional options to renew the term of the Lease, in each case for a term of twenty-five (25) years.  By executing this letter, Landlord and Tenant are agreeing that the Lease is amended to create the second of such additional options pursuant to which the term of the Lease may be renewed for the twenty-five (25) year term commencing on October 1, 2028 and expiring on September 30, 2053 (the “Second Additional Renewal Term”) upon the same rental (including Basic Rent, Primary Overage Rent and Secondary Overage Rent) and other terms and conditions as provided in the Lease.

Tenant hereby exercises its option to renew the term of the Lease for the Second Additional Renewal Term, upon the terms set forth in the preceding paragraph.

Very truly yours,

FISK BUILDING ASSOCIATES L.L.C.

By: 

/s/ Peter L. Malkin

Peter L. Malkin, Member

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 

250 West 57th St. Associates L.L.C.

as of January 1, 2010

Page 2

AGREED TO AND ACCEPTTED:

250 WEST 57TH ST. ASSOCIATES L.L.C.

By: 

/s/ Peter L. Malkin

Peter L. Malkin, Member

By: 

/s/ Anthony E. Malkin

Anthony E. Malkin, Member
EXHIBIT 32.2

Union Carbide Corporation and Subsidiaries

---

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I,
Edward W. Rich, Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of Union Carbide Corporation (the "Corporation"), certify that:

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Union Carbide Corporation and will be retained by Union Carbide Corporation and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

|/s/EDWARD W. RICHEdward W. Rich
Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
October 30, 2003 | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | 

33

---

QuickLinks
#### State *versus*Phinney.

In a complaint charging a misdemeanor, the defendant is not precluded from, traversing any material allegation, though made under a *videlicet.*

Exceptions from the District Court, Cole, J.

The defendant was prosecuted by complaint for selling spirituous “ *liquor, not imported, viz., to Davis, one glass."*He moved the court to quash the indictment, and after a conviction he moved that judgment be arrested. The reasons offered for the motions were —

1. That the facts charged do not amount to an offence.

2. That the allegations coming before the *videlicet*do not describe an offence.

3. That the allegations coming after the *videlicet,*cannot aid the allegations going before it.

The motions were overruled, and the - defendant excepted.

*A. B. Holden*and *A. W. True,*for the defendant.

1. The charging part of the allegation in the complaint should state the name of the person to whom the liquor was sold. *Commonwealth*v. *Drew,*21 Pick. 334; *same*v. *Philips,*16 Pick. 211.

2. The substantive charge in the complaint, cannot be enlarged by matter under the *videlicet.*Such matters are not traversable. *Paine*v. *Fox,*16 Mass. 132; 1 Chitty’s Plead. 644, 349, 351; *Darkin's case,*2 Saunders, 290, and cases cited in the notes to that case.

*440
      *Tallman, Attorney*General, declined answering.

Tenney, J.,

orally.—The complaint is of peculiar structure. It is not certain that it contains a *videlicet;*we consider it rail-er a repetition. But counsel assume it to be a *videlicet,*and rely on some authorities. That in 21st Pick, is inapplicable. It relates only to the purchaser’s name, and that from 16th Mass, relates only to the time.

The counsel supposes that what comes under a *videlicet*cannot be traversed. But that is not *now*considered to be the law. Every *material*fact, though laid under a *videlicet,*is traversable. 1 Chitty’s Plead. (3d Amer. ed.) 586. The earlier doctrine is exploded.

*Exceptions overruled.*
EXHIBIT 32.2



             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
               SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Trinity Learning Corporation (the "Company")
Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2005 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Christine R. Larson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

     3.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
          or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
          and

     4.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of
          operations of the Company.


Date: May 13, 2005            /S/ Edward P. Mooney
                              ---------------------------------------
                              Edward P. Mooney
                              President and Chief Financial Officer






         A signed original of this written statement required by Section
         906 has been provided to Trinity Learning Corporation and will be
         retained by it and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
         Commission or its staff upon request.
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v ALEJANDRO COLLAZO-BERMEJO, Private E-2, U. S. Army, Appellant

8 USCMA 491, 24 CMR 301

No. 10,245

Decided December 13, 1957

*First Lieutenant Edwin E. Allen*argued the cause for Appellant,' Accused. With him on the brief were *Major Frank C. Stetson, First Lieutenant Lawrence R. Fullem*and *First Lieutenant Jerome H.*Gerber., *First Lieutenant Jay D. Fischer*argued the cause for Appellee, United' States. With him on the brief were *Lieutenant Colonel John G. Lee*and; *■Captain Thomas J. Nichols.*

Opinion of the Court

Homer Ferguson, Judge:

This is another in a series of cases upon which review was granted in or'der to consider the correctness of the law officer’s instructions relating to the offense of desertion. The instruction was as follows:

> *492“As to length of absence without authority, it is within the province of the court to determine whether or not the length of time involved, if in the absence of a satisfactory explanation, is of sufficient duration from which it can infer an intent to remain away permanently. You must determine whether or not the absence was much prolonged, and if so, whether or not there was a satisfactory explanation made for it.”

Substantially the same instruction has been held prejudicially erroneous in United States v Soccio, 8 USCMA 477, 24 CMR 287. It is error for the law officer to focus the court’s attention upon one fact — length of absence — to the exclusion of others, thereby permitting the court to infer therefrom an intent to remain away permanently. Such an instruction necessarily precludes the court from giving consideration to all the other evidence in the case. Additionally, we have held it error for a law officer to advise a court that it could infer an intent to remain away permanently from the length of the accused’s absence, in the absence of a “satisfactory” explanation. The burden of proof is never upon an accused to convince a court-martial of his innocence.

The decision of the board of review is reversed. The record of trial is returned to The Judge Advocate General of the Army for reference to a board of review. The board may, in its discretion, approve the lesser offense of absence without leave and reassess the sentence on that basis, or it may order a rehearing on the desertion charge.

Chief Judge Quinn concurs.

LATIMER, Judge (dissenting):

I dissent for the reasons set forth in my separate opinion in United States v Soccio, 8 USCMA 477, 24 CMR 287.
Rialto CAPITAL(logo)  2018 Annual Statement of
Servicer Compliance (Item 1123)  Pooling
and Servicing Agreement (the “Pooling and Servicing Agreement”) dated as of October 1, 2015 by and among
Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation as Depositor, Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National
Association as Master Servicer, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC as Special Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as
Trustee, Certificate Administrator, Paying Agent and Custodian and Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, as Operating Advisor
relating to the COMM 2015-CCRE27 Mortgage Trust, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates (COMM 2015-CCRE27)  The undersigned, a duly authorized
officer of Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as special servicer (the “Special Servicer”) herein certifies to the following:  1.
    All servicing activities and performance of such servicing activities under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement are performed on behalf of the Special Servicer.2.
    A review of the servicing activities and performance by the Special Servicer for the period of January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2018 (the “Reporting Period”) in accordance with the Pooling and Servicing Agreement has been conducted under my supervision.3.
    To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Special Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the terms of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, in all material respects for the Reporting Period and if there has been a failure to fulfill any such obligations in any material respect, each failure and the nature and status thereof has been specifically identified herein.  Certified by:
    /s/ Adam Singer
    
    Date: March 1, 2019Adam Singer, Managing Director
FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE
VARLEN CORPORATION
1993 DIRECTORS INCENTIVE STOCK GRANT PLAN

The Varlen Corporation 1993 Director Incentive Stock Grant Plan
(the "Director Stock Plan") shall be and hereby is amended,
effective May 29, 1997, as follows:

Section 7(1) of the Director Stock Plan shall be deleted and
replaced with the following:

          7.   Grant of Awards

               (1)  Terms of Awards.  Each individual who becomes
an eligible Director shall be granted an Award of Common Stock
worth $12,000 based on the average of the high/ask price and the
low/bid price for the Common Stock rounded down to the nearest
whole share determined (i) on the date of the annual meeting of
stockholders of the Company on which the Director is elected to
office, and (ii) on the date of each annual meeting of
stockholders of the Company thereafter so long as the Director
continues to serve as an eligible Director following the close of
such annual meeting.  If an individual becomes an eligible
Director on a date other than the date of an annual meeting of
stockholders of the Company, the eligible Director shall be
granted an Award on the date he takes the office for (i) shares
worth $12,000 as determined above if the date he takes office is
on or before six months anniversary of the previous annual
meeting of stockholders of the Company, or (ii) shares worth
$6,000 as determined above if the date he takes office is after
the six month anniversary of the previous annual meeting of
stockholders of the Company.  Each Director's Award shall be
conditioned on the Director (or the legal representative of his
estate in the event of his death) accepting the Award by paying
in cash the par value per share of Common Stock granted within 10
business days following the date the Award is granted.