alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### I. Magnin & Co. *v.*United States

No. 8023.

Entered at New York, N. Y.

Entry No. 796910.

(Decided July 9, 1951)

*Siegel, Mandell & Davidson (Sidney Mandell*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*David N. Edelstein,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Mollison, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the attorneys for the parties hereto that the instant appeal to reappraisement covers raffia sandals, shoes, and similar merchandise exported from Italy, manufactured by Ditta Magelli Adolfo.

> That on or about the date of exportation of the merchandise such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal market of Italy in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade for exportation to the United States including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all of the costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed, ready for shipment to the United States at the entered values of the merchandise herein, less the amount added under duress.

> That the foreign market value of such merchandise, as such value is defined in Section 402 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, was no higher.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the instant appeal to reappraisement be submitted on this stipulation.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that this stipulation is limited to sandals or shoes which appear on the invoices under item #914 in cases 12, 13 and 14, inch, manufactured by Ditta Magelli Adolfo, and is abandoned in all other respects.

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the sandals or shoes identified on the invoices under item No. 914 in- cases 12, 13, and 14, inclusive, manufactured by Ditta Magelli Adolfo, and that such values are the entered values, less the amount added under duress.

*402The appeal having been abandoned insofar as it relates to all other merchandise, to that extent the appeal is hereby dismissed.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
FINAL AGENDA Revised 9/9/08

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

PUBLIC MEETING ON

ENERGY CONSERVATION STANDARDS FOR

BATTERY CHARGER S AND EXTERNAL POWER SUPPLIES

Room 1E-245 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20585

September 12, 2008



## Purpose

During this meeting DOE will present the notice of proposed rulemaking on test procedures for battery chargers and external power supplies in standby mode and off mode as well as for multiple-output external power supplies in all operational modes. In addition, DOE will present the proposed reporting requirements for these products. This meeting is intended to familiarize

interested stakeholders with DOE’s st atutory requirements and proposed test procedures.



## Agenda

9:00 - 9:05 am Welcome

9:05 - 9:15 am Opening Remarks and Agenda Review

9:15 - 9:50 am Stakeholder Opening Statements

9:50 -10:30 am Introduction, Background and Legal Authority Overview of past, current, a nd future battery charger and external power supply rulemakings, including statutory authority, schedules, associated documents.

10:30 -10:45 am Battery Chargers Test Procedure: Definitions Proposed definitions to address standby mode and off mode.

10:45 - 11:00 am Coffee Break

11:00 - 11:20 am Battery Chargers Test Procedure: Test Measurement Proposed test measurements to address standby mode and off

mode.

11:20 - 11:50 am External Power Supply Test Procedure: Scope and

Definitions Proposed scope and definitions to address standby mode and off mode as well as multiple-output external power supplies.FINAL AGENDA Revised 9/9/08

11:50 - 12:20 pm External Power Supply Test Procedure: Test Apparatus and General Instructions Proposed test apparatus and gene ral instructions to address standby mode and off mode as well as multiple-output external power supplies. Amendments considered for single-voltage external power supplies are also discussed.

12:20 - 1:20 pm Break for Lunch (on your own)

1:20 - 2:35 pm External Power Supply Test Procedure: Test

Measurement Proposed test measurements to address standby mode and off mode as well as multiple-output external power supplies. Amendments considered for single-voltage external power supplies are also discussed.

2:35 - 2:50 pm Reporting Requirements Proposed certification procedures for Class A external power supplies.

2:50 - 3:05 pm Conclusion and Closing Remarks Discuss outstanding issues a nd make concluding remarks

3:05 pm Adjourn
# C_2018104EN.01002601.xml

| 19.3.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 104/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.3.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 104/26

---

Judgment of the General Court of 5 February 2018 — Pari Pharma v EMA

(Case T-235/15) (1)

1

((Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Documents held by the EMA and submitted in the context of the application for marketing authorisation for the medicinal product Vantobra - Decision to grant a third party access to the documents - Exception relating to the protection of commercial interests - No general presumption of confidentiality))

(2018/C 104/33)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Pari Pharma GmbH (Starnberg, Germany) (represented by: M. Epping and W. Rehmann, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Medicines Agency (EMA) (represented by: T. Jabłoński, A. Rusanov, S. Marino, A. Spina and N. Rampal Olmedo, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Interveners in support of the defendant: French Republic (represented by: D. Colas and J. Traband, acting as Agents) and Novartis Europharm Ltd (Camberley, United Kingdom) (represented by: C. Schoonderbeek, lawyer)

Interveners in support of the defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action under Article 263 TFEU for the annulment of Decision EMA/271043/2015 of the EMA of 24 April 2015, granting to a third party, pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents (OJ 2001 L 145, p. 43), access to documents containing information submitted in the context of an application for marketing authorisation for the medicinal product Vantobra.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Pari Pharma GmbH to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Medicines Agency (EMA), including those relating to the application for interim measures; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Pari Pharma GmbH to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Medicines Agency (EMA), including those relating to the application for interim measures;

| 3. | Orders the French Republic to bear its own costs; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the French Republic to bear its own costs;

| 4. | Orders Novartis Europharm Ltd to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders Novartis Europharm Ltd to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 221, 6.7.2015.

1

---
# C_2016410EN.01003501.xml

| 7.11.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 410/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.11.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 410/35

---

Order of the General Court of 14 September 2016 — Syriatel Mobile Telecom v Council

(Case T-471/15) (1)

1

(2016/C 410/57)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 337, 12.10.2015.

1

---
# C_2016402EN.01004102.xml

| 31.10.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 402/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.10.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 402/41

---

Judgment of the General Court of 15 September 2016 — Arrom Conseil v EUIPO — Nina Ricci (Roméo has a Gun by Romano Ricci)

(Case T-359/15) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for registration of the EU figurative mark Roméo has a Gun by Romano Ricci - Earlier EU word marks NINA RICCI and RICCI - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Unfair advantage taken of the distinctive character or reputation of the earlier marks - Damage to reputation - Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009))

(2016/C 402/47)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Arrom Conseil (Paris, France) (represented by: C. Herissay Ducamp and J. Blanchard, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: H. Kunz, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Nina Ricci SARL (Paris, France) (represented by: E. Armijo Chávarri, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 13 April 2015 (Case R 1021/2014-1) relating to opposition proceedings between Nina Ricci SARL and Arrom Conseil.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Arrom Conseil to bear its own costs and pay the costs incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office and Nina Ricci SARL. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Arrom Conseil to bear its own costs and pay the costs incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office and Nina Ricci SARL.

---

(1)  OJ C 294, 7.9.2015.

1

---
# C_2016048EN.01004901.xml

| 8.2.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 48/49 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.2.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 48/49

---

Judgment of the General Court of 15 December 2015 — Shoe Branding Europe v OHIM (two parallel stripes on the long sleeves of a shirt)

(Case T-63/15) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Application for a Community trade mark consisting of two parallel stripes on the long sleeves of a shirt - Absolute ground for refusal - No distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2016/C 048/55)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Shoe Branding Europe BVBA (Oudenaarde, Belgium) (represented by: J. Løje, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented initially by P. Geroulakos, and subsequently by D. Gája, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 3 December 2014 (Case R 2560/2013-5), concerning an application for registration of a sign consisting of two parallel stripes on the long sleeves of a shirt as a Community trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Shoe Branding Europe BVBA to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Shoe Branding Europe BVBA to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 107, 30.3.2015.

1

---
Before the Third Division,

April 10, 1951

No. 55460.

#### Natl. Distillers Product Corp. *v.*United States,

protest 909048-G (Cleveland).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

It was stipulated that the protest is abandoned insofar as it relates to the spirits contained in 25 barrels, Nos. 504 to 528, inclusive, covered by warehouse withdrawal entry No. 178, dated October 29, 1936, the subject of warehouse entry No. 144. For the reasons stated in *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States (22*Cust. Ct. 33, C. D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained except as to the merchandise noted above. To that extent the protest was overruled.
Exhibit 33.7  LOGO REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSIONS REGULATION AB SERVICING
CRITERIA For the calendar year ending December 31, 2018, National Tax Search, LLC has been a Tax Service Vendor for Wells Fargo
Bank N.A.(the Servicer). National Tax Search, LLC (NTS) is responsible for assessing compliance as
of December 31, 2018 and for the period from January 1, 2018 through December 31, 2018 (the Reporting Period) with the servicing criteria set forth in Title 17, Section 229.1122(d) of the Code of Federal Regulations
(the CFR). NTS has used the servicing criteria communicated to NTS by the Servicer to assess compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Only servicing criteria 1122(d)(l)(ii), 1122(d)(1)(iv), 1122(d)(2)(ii), 1122 (d)(2)(v),
1122(d)2(vi), 1122(d)(4)(xi), and 1122(d)(4)(xii) (the Applicable Servicing Criteria) are applicable to the activities NTS performs with respect to the transactions covered by this report. NTS has determined that the remaining servicing
criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the SEC Regulation AB are not applicable to the activities it performs with respect to the transactions covered by this report. The transactions covered by this report include all tax payments made on behalf of
the Servicer using NTSs TaxQ system (the Platform Transactions). NTS, as a vendor, has assessed its compliance with the
Applicable Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Period and has concluded that NTS has complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2018 and for the Reporting Period with respect to the Platform
Transactions taken as a whole. Plante & Moran, PLLC, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation
report on the assessment of compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2018 and for the Reporting Period as set forth in this assertion. National Tax Search, LLC, as Vendor to Servicer  LOGO Lori D. Eshoo, President/CEO January 25, 2019 130 S. Jefferson Street Suite300 Chicago, IL 60661
EXHIBIT 31.1
 
 CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
 
 I, Bruce W. Marlow, certify that:
 
 1.
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of 21st Century Insurance Group;2.
Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;b)
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc)
disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and5.
The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):a)
all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process and summarize financial information; andb)
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
 
 Date:
July 21, 2004

/s/ Bruce W. MarlowBruce W. MarlowPresident and Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the 
Company's Balance Sheet as of March 31, 1998 and the Statement Of Income
for the year ended March 31, 1998, and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial staements.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          84,124
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0    
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                84,124
<PP&E>                                       7,995,908
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,878,473
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,218,523<F1>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           46,098<F2>
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (636,207)        
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,218,523<F3>
<SALES>                                        267,289<F4>
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               267,289
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                16,957<F5>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              66,609
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                183,723
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            183,723
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   183,723
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   255.17<F6>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   255.17<F6>
<FN>
<F1>Includes unamortized mortgage refinancing costs           
<F2>Accrued interest on mortgage and first mortgage principal payment due 
    within one year 
<F3>Includes long-term debt 
<F4>Rental income includes basic rent and advance of primary overage rent 
<F5>Supervisory services and amortization of mortgage refinance costs 
<F6>Earnings per $5,000 participation unit, based on 720 participation units
    outstanding during the period
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
### 365
**OFFICE OF**  THE **ATTORNEY GENERAL**  **OF TU(AS**  **OROVLR SLLLCRS**  **AUSTIN AI?-OI)WII**  **GCNCML** l onorrblo Y. 1. Idrardr o ount~

Attorna~ t1aterlA Oopnl~ flrtork, Fau **bar Br.**  **Ldmrdrt**

jart OplnloQ lo. o-Ts3i Bat 

### Bam8rlt~**for the** **hnrbaad to**  **Tour roquort** 

**?or an**  oplnl 

### utter **ir u**  followst

department four quartion. should t i8 atit& onru00884~ r0r the vlfo in tha

l **rrrotiui of**  **the band**  **w bar.** louornble w. L. xdlirrd*. ?rge 2 

### 366

"8Iacm under the Coaatltutloa In Texer a cwrried womm msr hold offlom, #he ur of oourao do all thiaga necesrr~ or lwident to the prop0r 

### tx0mi8e of that 

### right, 8p~h •~ 

### 8fmtig 0 bond. The genenl rule forbiddingher to contmot e 118bIlIt~vould no LEOIW preventher mrklug l bond than it vould derq her the right to wk. neoerroq **bonda** In the pmseoutloa of aulta peulttod **to** her. In lech inmtmcs the parer I# ma lnoidtmt to the right conferred,end la necerrrrI1~ Implied, If not sxpresely required,by the **atatuto** deaandlngbonds." In 23 Tex. Jur., ?egs 216, SW. 180, It 18 arid: "l'b vife's bondr **executed In**  **the ooume**  **of** legal proceedingsto vhloh mhe ID l party, either olv¶,l or criminal, of **ccurot,** bInda her penonrlly vlthout rtgtrd to her husband'm joinder,for this Ia tn Ineldtnt to her right to lltlgstt or defeul in court." ?or thI8 pronouncementsevers1 **ceatm** ere olttd. Tht huabtnd mey, hwtvtr, **becomo** surety for his wife upon ruoh ofSIcIs1bond and would **bt** liable 8~ suoh sumty preclstly ls ray othtp surety for eq liabilityof tht vlft es prlnolpal thereon. He 18 **act** raqulrtd to beoomt such surety fbr 8ht may furnish other sureties **at her**  option.

ATTORh'EH

GEtii OF TXXAS

BY
Exhibit
32.2







CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO
 SECTION
1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 Pursuant
to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as Executive
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of VSE Corporation (the "Company"),
does hereby certify that to the best of the undersigned's
knowledge:
 
 
 1) the Company's Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 (the "Report"), fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and
 
 2) the information contained in the
Company's Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: July
      30, 2010
            /s/
      T. R. LoftusT.
      R. LoftusExecutive
      Vice President andChief
      Financial Officer(Principal
      Accounting Officer)
No. 46951.

#### Protests 914146-G, etc., of I. Zendman, Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items consist of laces made on a bobbinet-jaequard machine and are similar to those involved in Abstract 41121, the protests were sustained.
Form 20-F | Integrated Media Technology Limited  Exhibit 8.1   List
of subsidiaries  Subsidiary
    Name
    %
    heldCIMC Marketing Pty Limited
    100%
    DirectGrand Dynasty Limited
    100%
    DirectGrand Dynasty (Zhenjiang) Co., Limited
    100%
    IndirectGreifenberg Digital Limited
    40.75%
    DirectGreifenberg Analytics Limited
    40.75%
    IndirectGreifenberg Capital Limited
    40.75%
    IndirectIMTE Limited (formerly Great Gold Investment Limited)
    100%
    DirectIMTE Asia Limited
    100%
    DirectItana Holdings Limited
    100%
    DirectRenfrew International Limited
    100%
    DirectLonsdale International Limited
    100%
    DirectSmart (Zhenjiang) Intelligent Technology Limited (formerly Smart (Shenzhen) Technology Limited
    100%
    IndirectSmartglass Limited
    100%
    DirectSunup Holdings Limited
    51%
    DirectSunup Korea Limited
    51%
    Indirect