alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1


                                                                   EXHIBIT 12(a)


                             UNION ELECTRIC COMPANY
               COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                                                 
                                                                    Year Ended December 31,                      12 Months   
                                                -------------------------------------------------------------    Ended       
                                                                                                                 March 31,
                                                1992          1993         1994         1995          1996         1997
                                                ----          ----         ----         ----          ----         ----
                                                              (Thousands of Dollars Except Ratios)
<S>                                           <C>          <C>           <C>          <C>          <C>          <C>             
Net income for the Period                     $302,748     $297,160      $320,757     $314,107     $304,876     $296,366
                                              --------     --------      --------     --------     --------     --------
   Add:
      Taxes Based on income                    197,009      182,716       203,827      207,734      196,210      189,991
                                              --------     --------      --------     --------     --------     --------
      Fixed Charges:
         Interest on Debt                      125,798      124,430       135,608      129,239      128,375      130,156 (*)
         Amortization of Premium and
            Discount, Less Expense on Debt;
            and Bond Defeasance Cost             9,521        5,170         5,504        5,502        4,269        3,811
         Rentals (See note)                        908        1,314         1,299        3,330        3,458        3,716
                                              --------     --------      --------     --------     --------     --------
            Total Fixed Charges                136,227      130,914       142,411      138,071      136,102      137,683
                                              --------     --------      --------     --------     --------     --------


Earnings Available for Fixed Charges          $635,984     $610,790      $666,995     $659,912     $637,188     $624,040
                                              ========     ========      ========     ========     ========     ========


Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges                4.66         4.66          4.68         4.78         4.68         4.53
                                                  ====         ====          ====         ====         ====         ====
</TABLE>





(*)   Total annual interest charges on all bonds for the twelve months ended
March 31, 1997 was $112,905,000.  

      Note: Represents the interest factor applicable to rentals.
Appendix	B:		

Notice	of	Proposed	Collection	and		

Request	for	Comment:		

Information	Collection	Request	for	the	

Greenhouse	Gas	Reporting	Program;		

EPA	ICR	No.	2300.10		

(77	FR	28376,	May	14,	2012)	
List of Rulemakings Associated with the GHGRP

Title OMB Control Number EPA ICR Number

Final Rule 2060-0629 2300.03

Change: Add two forms 2060-0629 2300.04

Technical Correction 2060-0629 2300.05

Technical Correction 2060-0629 2300.07

Reconsideration Package 2060-0629 2300.06

Reconsideration Package 2060-0629 2300.08

Technical Correction 2060-0629 2300.09

Final Rule 2060-0646 2374.02

Final Rule 2060-0647 2396.01

Technical Correction 2060-0647 2396.02

Final Rule 2060-0649 2372.02

Technical Correction 2060-0649 2372.03

Final Rule 2060-0650 2373.02

Change Worksheet 2060-0650 2373.03

Technical Correction 2060-0650 2373.04

Final Rule 2060-0651 2376.02

Change Worksheet 2060-0651 2376.03

Final Rule - Amended 2060-0651 2376.05

Mandatory Reporting of Greenhouse Gases: Injection and Geological Sequestration of Carbon Dioxide, 

Subparts RR and UU

Mandatory Reporting of Greenhouse Gases: Additional Sources of Fluorinated Greenhouse Gases, 

Subparts I, L, DD, QQ, and SS

Mandatory Reporting of Greenhouse Gases: Petroleum and Natural Gas, Subpart W

Mandatory Reporting of Greenhouse Gases - Final Rule

Corporate ID Reporting Rule

Mandatory Reporting of Greenhouse Gases from Magnesium Production, Underground Coal Mines, 

Industrial Wastewater Treatment, and Industrial Waste Landfills, Subparts T, FF, II and TT

6/27 B-1
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER



I, Gordon R. Arnold, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Sierra Monitor Corporation;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

a.

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b.

Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c.

Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a.

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b.

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

Date:

October 29, 2007

By:    /s/ Gordon R. Arnold

Gordon R. Arnold

Chief Executive Officer







Page 20 of 22
#### S. H. Pomerance Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States

No. 6754.

Entry No. 705052, etc.

Invoices dated London, England, May 21,1946, etc.

Certified May 24, 1946, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., July 17, 1946,. etc.

(Decided January 13, 1947)

*Siegel, Mandell & Davidson*for the plaintiffs.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Mollison, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following s tipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the -value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importers on entry because of advances by ¡the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
# C_2016305EN.01001002.xml

| 22.8.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 305/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.8.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 305/10

---

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 16 June 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny — Poland) — Minister Finansów v Jan Mateusiak

(Case C-229/15) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Taxation - Value added tax - Directive 2006/112/EC - Articles 18(c), 184 and 187 - Taxable transactions - Cessation of the taxable economic activity - Retention of goods on which VAT became deductible - Adjustment of deductions - Adjustment period - Taxation pursuant to Article 18(c) of Directive 2006/112 on expiry of the adjustment period))

(2016/C 305/15)

Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Referring court

Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Minister Finansów

Applicant:

Defendant: Jan Mateusiak

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 18(c) of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax, as amended by Council Directive 2009/162/EU of 22 December 2009, must be interpreted as meaning that, when a taxable person ceases to carry out a taxable economic activity, the retention of goods by that taxable person, where valued added tax on such goods became deductible upon their acquisition, can be treated as a supply of goods for consideration and be subject to value added tax if the adjustment period laid down in Article 187 of Directive 2006/112, as amended by Directive 2009/162, has passed.

---

(1)  OJ C 294, 7.9.2015.

1

---
No. 53214.

#### Czecho-Slovak Glass Products Co. *v.*United States,

protest 139791-K (A) (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protest.
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, John C. Lawrence, President, and Chief Executive Officer of United States
Antimony Corporation (the "Company") do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to my knowledge:

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended
March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: /s/ John C. Lawrence
      ------------------------
      John C. Lawrence
      President and Chief Executive Officer
### Eocene megafossils from Ishigaki-shima, Ryukyu-retto

By: F. S. MacNeil

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp399B

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
**Exhibit 99.1**

April 17, 2009 

Mr. James E. Murphy, Chief Financial Officer 

United Refining Company 

15 Bradley Street 

Warren, PA 

Dear Mr. Murphy: 

As stated in Note 2 to the financial statements of United Refining Company for the three and six months ended February 28, 2009 contained in its quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended February 28, 2009, the Companychanged its method of accounting for inventories during interim periods from adjusting the inventory LIFO reserve on an annual basis to adjusting the inventory LIFO reserve on a quarterly basis. The Company states that the newly adopted accountingprinciple is preferable in the circumstances because it better reflects interim results consistent with annual LIFO. This change in accounting policy has no effect on annual reporting. At your request, we have reviewed and discussed with you thecircumstances and the business judgment and planning that formulated your basis to make this change in accounting principle. 

It should be understood thatcriteria have not been established by the Financial Accounting Standards Board for selecting from among the alternative accounting principles that exist in this area. Further, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants has notestablished the standards by which an auditor can evaluate the preferability of one accounting principle among a series of alternatives. However, for purposes of the Company’s compliance with the requirements of the Securities and ExchangeCommission, we are furnishing this letter. 

Based on our review and discussion, we concur with management’s judgment that the newly adopted accountingprinciple described in Note 2 to the financial statements is preferable in the circumstances. In formulating this position, we are relying on management’s business planning and judgment, which we do not find to be unreasonable. Because we havenot audited any financial statements of United Refining Company as of any date or for any period subsequent to August 31, 2008, we express no opinion on the financial statements for the three and six months ended February 29, 2009.

Very truly yours, 

 

 

/s/ BDO Seidman, LLP
1 A project of the TIDES center

Post Office Box 254, Tallahassee, Florida 32302

Phone: 850

- 322

- 7978

llyoung2@earthlink.net

www.cleanwaternetwork

- fl.org

September 21, 2010

Thomas J. Gardner

Office of Science and Technology (Mail Code 4305T)

Office of Wa ter

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW

Washington, D.C. 20460

SHPDcomments@epa.gov

Re: Comments regarding HQ

- OW

- 2010

- 0606 (proposed rulemaking to revise water

quality standards regu lations)

Dear Mr. Gardner and others:

On September 3, 2010 the Mississippi River Collaborative submitted a comment letter to the

US EPA regarding proposed rulemaking to revise water quality standards regulations. That

letter is attached to this letter f or your convenience. The Clean Water Network of Florida

and the below signed groups are writing to add our support to the comments that were

submitted in the attached letter.

Several of the regulations that are to be revised were the focus of litigation initiated by the

Clean Water Network of Florida and we are eager to see EPA revise federal regulations in a

way that will be consistent with the findings of the 11 th Circuit and will also result in the

highest levels of protection for all of our waters.

Thank you in advance for your consideration and we ask that you add this letter to your

comment record.

Sincerely,

Linda L. Young

Director

Clean Water Network of FL2

Organizations joining this letter include:

Dr. Helen King

Protect Our Wate rsheds, Inc.

George L. Jones

Executive Director/Indian Riverkeeper

Treasure Coast Environmental Defense Fund

& President St Lucie County Conservation Alliance

Maggie Davidson, President

Democratic Women’s Club of Northeast Broward

Pompano Beach, Flor ida

Mac Davis, President

Gulf Coast Conservancy

PO Box 738

Aripeka, Florida 34679

www.gulfcoastconservancy.org < http://www.gulfcoastconservancy.org >

William & Mary Hillberg

3780 Sierra Drive

Merritt Is land, FL 32953

Dr. Enid Sisskin, President

Gulf Coast Environmental Defense

James Lane, President

Friends of Perdido Bay

Glenn Compton

- Chairman

ManaSota

- 88

P.O. Box 1728

Nokomis, Florida 34274

(941) 966

- 6256

(941) 966

- 0659 (fax

http://www.manasota88.org

http://www.ourphosphaterisk.com

Stephen L. Williams, Pres.

Florida Panther Society, Inc.3

Drew Martin

Conservation Chair, Loxahatchee Group, Sierra Club of Flor ida

Neil A. Armingeon

St. Johns Riverkeeper

narming@ju.edu

904

- 256

- 7591

Quod incepimus conficiemus

Capt. Ed Davidson, Chairman

Florida Keys Citizens Coalition, Inc.

Susan Woods, president

Floridan Aquifer legal Defense Organization

Amy Mosher, Preside nt

Save Our Aquifer, Inc.

Dan Lobeck, President

Control Growth Now, Inc.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 404 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 404

Expressing the sense of the Senate that all people in the United States 
 should participate in a moment of silence to reflect upon the service 
 and sacrifice of members of the Armed Forces both at home and abroad.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

               March 16 (legislative day, March 15), 2006

 Ms. Stabenow submitted the following resolution; which was considered 
                             and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Expressing the sense of the Senate that all people in the United States 
 should participate in a moment of silence to reflect upon the service 
 and sacrifice of members of the Armed Forces both at home and abroad.

Whereas it was through the brave and noble efforts of the forefathers of the 
        United States that the United States first gained freedom and became a 
        sovereign country;
Whereas there are more than 1,300,000 active component and more than 1,100,000 
        reserve component members of the Armed Forces serving the Nation in 
        support and defense of the values and freedom that all people in the 
        United States cherish;
Whereas the members of the Armed Forces deserve the utmost respect and 
        admiration of the people of the United States for putting their lives in 
        danger for the sake of the freedoms enjoyed by all people of the United 
        States;
Whereas members of the Armed Forces are defending freedom and democracy around 
        the globe and are playing a vital role in protecting the safety and 
        security of all the people of the United States;
Whereas all people of the United States should participate in a moment of 
        silence to support the troops; and
Whereas March 26th, 2006, is designated as ``National Support the Troops Day'': 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that all people in the 
United States should participate in a moment of silence to reflect upon 
the service and sacrifice of members of the Armed Forces both at home 
and abroad.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2016410EN.01002002.xml

| 7.11.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 410/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.11.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 410/20

---

Order of the General Court of 13 September 2016 — Sogepa v Commission

(Case T-761/15) (1)

1

((Action for annulment - State aid - Crystal-ware - Aid in the form of a loan - Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market - Obligation to recover the aid granted to an insolvent undertaking - Disregard of formal requirements - Inadmissibility))

(2016/C 410/28)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Société wallonne de gestion et de participations (Sogepa) (Liège, Belgium) (represented by: A. Lepièce and H. Baeyens, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J.-F. Brakeland, L. Armati and B. Stromsky, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application based on Article 263 TFEU and asking for annulment of Articles 3 to 6 of Commission decision (EU) 2015/1825 of 31 July 2014 on non-notified State aid SA.34791 (2013/C) (ex 2012/NN) — Belgium — Rescue aid for Val Saint-Lambert SA (OJ 2015 L 269, p. 47).

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as being inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as being inadmissible.

| 2. | Société wallonne de gestion et de participations (Sogepa) is ordered to bear, in addition to its own costs, those incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Société wallonne de gestion et de participations (Sogepa) is ordered to bear, in addition to its own costs, those incurred by the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 68, 22.2.2016.

1

---
# C_2015065EN.01005302.xml

| 23.2.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 65/53 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.2.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 65/53

---

Action brought on 8 January 2015 — Beiersdorf v OHIM (Q10)

(Case T-4/15)

(2015/C 065/73)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Beiersdorf AG (Hamburg, Germany) (represented by: A. Renck and J. Fuhrmann, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Defendant:

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Trade mark at issue: Community figurative mark containing the word element ‘Q10’ — Application for registration No 11 480 837

Trade mark at issue:

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 8 October 2014 in Case R 2050/2013-1

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order OHIM to pay the costs, including those of the applicant. |
| --- | --- |

—

order OHIM to pay the costs, including those of the applicant.

Pleas in law

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009;

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009;

| — | Infringement of Article 32(2) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 32(2) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---