alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2016200EN.01002102.xml

| 6.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 200/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 200/21

---

Order of the General Court of 15 April 2016 — Impresa Costruzioni Giuseppe Maltauro v Commission

(Case T-320/15) (1)

1

((Public procurement - Withdrawal of the contested act - No need to adjudicate))

(2016/C 200/30)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Impresa Costruzioni Giuseppe Maltauro SpA (Vicenza, Italy) (represented by: M. Merola, C. Santacroce and C. Toniolo, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: D. Recchia and F. Dintilhac, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of the decision of 7 April 2015 of the Director General of the European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC.B6/RL/Ares(2015)) excluding the applicant from participation in all procedures for the award of contracts and grants financed by the general budget of the European Union for a period of two years and 10 months.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

The Court hereby orders:

| 1. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

| 2. | Each party shall bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Each party shall bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 254, 3.8.2015.

1

---
|               |                                             |  EXHIBIT 32.2 |
|--------------------|--------------------------------------------------|--------------------|
|     | Union Carbide Corporation and Subsidiaries  |               |

| 1. | the      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Corporation for the quarter ended      March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the      “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Corporation. |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/      EUDIO GIL                                                           |   |   |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
| Eudio      GilVice      President, Treasurer andChief      Financial Officer |   |   |
| Date:      May 4, 2009                                                       |   |   |

----
Exhibit 32.2
 
 
 
 Certification of CFO Pursuant to
 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
 As Adopted Pursuant to
 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of U.S. Energy Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Robert Scott Lorimer, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:
 
 (1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 
 
 
 
 /s/  Robert Scott LorimerRobert Scott Lorimer,Chief Financial OfficerMay 9, 2010
 
 
 This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
 
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to U.S. Energy Corp. and will be retained by U.S. Energy Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
No. 47603.

#### Protests 18050-K, etc., of Acierno Bros. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the ■court dismissed the protests.
# C_2018134EN.01001801.xml

| 16.4.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 134/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.4.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 134/18

---

Judgment of the General Court of 27 February 2018 — Gramberg v EUIPO — Mahdavi Sabet (Case for a mobile phone)

(Case T-166/15) (1)

1

((Community design - Invalidity proceedings - Registered Community design representing a case for a mobile phone - Disclosure of the design - Article 7(1) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 - Evidence submitted for the first time before the General Court))

(2018/C 134/24)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Claus Gramberg (Essen, Germany) (represented: initially by S. Kettler, and subsequently by F. Klopmeier and G. Becker, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: S. Hanne, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Sorouch Mahdavi Sabet (Paris, France)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 13 January 2015 (Case R 460/2013-3), relating to invalidity proceedings between Mr Gramberg and Mr Mahdavi Sabet.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 13 January 2015 (Case R 460/2013-3); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 13 January 2015 (Case R 460/2013-3);

| 2. | Dismisses the action as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

| 3. | Orders EUIPO to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Mr Claus Gramberg, including the expenses necessarily incurred for the purposes of the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders EUIPO to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Mr Claus Gramberg, including the expenses necessarily incurred for the purposes of the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO.

---

(1)  OJ C 198, 15.6.2015.

1

---
#### Brown and Appleton *versus*Samuel P. Strickland.

Administrators *de bonis non,*cannot, in that capacity, maintain a real action.

Writ of entry. General issue with claim for betterments, submitted to the court for nonsuit or default.

Several deeds, with much other evidence, were offered as to title, boundaries and betterments. The plaintiffs claim under the will of one Billings. By that will, the plaintiff, Brown, and one George Starrett were constituted executors and trustees, and in case either of them should die, the Judge of Probate was authorized to appoint some person as the successor, “ to the end that there may be and continue two suitable persons, in whom the trust estate, hereby created, shall be vested, and on whom the execution of this will and the perform*175anee of the trusts may devolve.” Starrett died. The Judge of Probate appointed Mr. Appleton, administrator *de bonis*non, who as such gave the bond, published the notices and -took the oath thereof, as required of administrators *de bonis non.*

*J. Appleton*and *D. T.*Jewett, for plaintiffs.

*Cutting*and Kelley, for defendants.

Wells, J.,

orally.—A demandant in a real action must prove his title. Under the will the title was vested in two persons, executors and trustees. Provision was made in the will for the appointment of a substitute, if one of them should die.

One of them died. Thereupon Mr. Appleton was appointed and qualified, and gave bond, not as a trustee, but as administrator *de bonis non.*In his commission, nothing is said in reference to rights or duties as a trustee. The offices and the requisite bonds are very distinct.

In administrators *de bonis non.*the title to the testator’s real estate does not vest. They can maintain no real actions. We think no title vested in Mr. Appleton, upon which to maintain this suit.

There are other questions of magnitude in this case, but it is unnecessary to discuss them. *Demandants nonsuit.*
img125361817_0.jpg













Annual Statement as to Compliance

For the Year Ended December 31, 2022



Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc.,

Series 2016-GC37



Pursuant to Section 3.01 (32) of the Subservicing Agreement governing the referenced transaction (the “Servicing Agreement”), I hereby attest that:



i. A review of the activities and performance of Berkadia as Subservicer during the period has been made under my supervision.




ii. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, Berkadia as Subservicer has fulfilled, in all material respects, its obligations under this Subservicing Agreement throughout the period and no default by the Subservicer under the Subservicing Agreement has occurred and is continuing.




Berkadia,



/s/ Mark E. McCool



Mark E. McCool

President

February 10, 2023









Inv. 823 Lib. A

---
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsVertical drop test of a transport fuselage center section including the wheel wellsA Boeing 707 fuselage section was drop tested to measure structural, seat, and anthropomorphic dummy response to vertical crash loads. The specimen had nominally zero pitch, roll and yaw at impact with a sink speed of 20 ft/sec. Results from this drop test and other drop tests of different transport sections will be used to prepare for a full-scale crash test of a B-720.Document ID19840004463Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsWilliams, M. S.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Hayduk, R. J.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 4, 2013Publication DateOctober 1, 1983Subject CategoryStructural MechanicsReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:85706NASA-TM-85706Accession Number84N12531Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-33-53-05Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19840004463.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### John Forsythe Co., Inc. *v.*United States

No. 7421.

Invoice dated Manchester, England, August 8, 1941.

Certified August 8, 1941.

Entered at New York, N. Y., September 22, 1941.

Entry No. 715480.

(Decided October 27, 1947)

*William Whynman*for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Kincheloe, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

*281On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values were the entered values.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 51 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 51

   Recognizing the importance of the writings of Dashiell Hammett to 
 American literature and culture on the 75th anniversary of the first 
                 publication of ``The Maltese Falcon''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 14, 2005

Mrs. Feinstein submitted the following resolution; which was considered 
                             and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Recognizing the importance of the writings of Dashiell Hammett to 
 American literature and culture on the 75th anniversary of the first 
                 publication of ``The Maltese Falcon''.

Whereas Samuel Dashiell Hammett was born in St. Mary's County, Maryland, on May 
        27, 1894, and died in New York City, on January 10, 1961;
Whereas Dashiell Hammett joined Pinkerton's National Detective Agency in 1915 at 
        the age of 21 and worked for the agency in Maryland, Washington, Idaho, 
        Utah, Montana, and California;
Whereas Dashiell Hammett served the United States in the Army Ambulance Motor 
        Corps during World War I and, after enlisting in 1942 at the age of 48, 
        in the Aleutian Islands during World War II, and is buried at Arlington 
        National Cemetery;
Whereas Dashiell Hammett wrote ``The Maltese Falcon'' (published on Febraury 14, 
        1930), 1 of the most widely-read crime novels in history, which 
        introduced the literary figure Sam Spade, 1 of the most famous 
        detectives in American literature, and set San Francisco as the center 
        of hard-boiled crime fiction;
Whereas ``The Maltese Falcon'' has appeared in hundreds of editions in 50 
        countries and over 30 languages and was adapted into 3 movies, including 
        a 1941 Warner Brothers film directed by John Huston and starring 
        Humphrey Bogart, which has been recognized by the American Film 
        Institute as 1 of the greatest movies of all time; and
Whereas ``The Maltese Falcon'' turned mystery and crime novels into a widely-
        recognized genre of literature and is a classic novel of American 
        literature: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) salutes Dashiell Hammett as 1 of the most notable 
        authors of hard-boiled crime fiction;
            (2) notes the 75th anniversary of the publication of 
        Dashiell Hammet's ``The Maltese Falcon''; and
            (3) recognizes ``The Maltese Falcon'' as a great American 
        crime novel.
                                 <all>
```
#### James Bute Co. *v.*United States

No. 7440.

Invoice dated Mexico City, D. F., June 27, 1944.

Certified June 28, 1944.

Entered at Houston, Tex., July 14, 1944.

Entry No. 5-H.

(Decided November 19, 1947)

*Edward A. Kelly*for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Bao,*Assistant Attorney General *(Bichard H. Welsh,*special attorney), for the defendant.

Cline, Judge:

This is an appeal for reappraisement of cotton cloth imported from Mexico. At the trial counsel for the parties submitted the case on the following stipulation:

> Mr. Kelly: In Reappraisement 156968-A, of James Bute Co., it'is hereby stipulated and agreed, subject to the approval of the court, that the market value or price at the time of exportation of the. merchandise involved herein at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade for exportation to the United States, plus, when not included in such costs, the cost of containers and coverings of whatever nature, and all other costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed, ready for shipment to the United States, is as follows: 46 centavos Mexican money per meter, plus taxes, packing and containers, as invoiced.

> It is further stipulated and agreed that there was no higher foreign value for the merchandise herein at the time of exportation.

> It is further stipulated and agreed that this case may be submitted on the foregoing stipulation.

> Mr. Welsh: The Government so agrees and stipulates. The Government’s agreement is predicated upon the advice and with the consent of the appraiser, Mr. Bower, who is present in court.

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such value is 46 centavos Mexican money per meter, plus taxes, pacldng and containers, as invoiced.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
# C_2017129EN.01001701.xml

| 24.4.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 129/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.4.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 129/17

---

Judgment of the General Court of 1 March 2017 — SEAE v KL

(Case T-278/15 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - Civil service - Officials - Promotion - 2013 promotion procedure - Non-inclusion in the list of promoted officials - No error of law))

(2017/C 129/27)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Appellant: European External Action Service (EEAS) (represented initially by S. Marquardt and M. Silva, then by S. Marquardt, acting as Agents)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: KL (represented by: N. de Montigny and J.-N. Louis, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings:

Intervener in support of the Appellant: European Commission (represented by: G. Berscheid and C. Berardis-Kayser, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the Appellant:

Re:

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal [confidential] (2) seeking the annulment of that judgment.

2

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1) | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1)

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2) | Orders the European External Action Service (EEAS) to bear its own costs and pay those incurred by KL in the present proceedings; |
| --- | --- |

2)

Orders the European External Action Service (EEAS) to bear its own costs and pay those incurred by KL in the present proceedings;

| 3) | Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs incurred in the present proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

3)

Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs incurred in the present proceedings.

---

(1)  OJ C 294, 7.9.2015.

1

(2)  Confidential information omitted.

2

---
# C_2016078EN.01001901.xml

| 29.2.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 78/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.2.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 78/19

---

Judgment of the General Court of 14 January 2016 — Zitro IP v OHIM (TRIPLE BONUS)

(Case T-318/15) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Application for Community figurative mark TRIPLE BONUS - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(c) and (2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2016/C 078/29)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Zitro IP Sàrl (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: A. Canela Giménez, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Crawcour and J. Crespo Carrillo, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 15 April 2015 (Case R 1648/2014-4) concerning an application for registration of the figurative sign TRIPLE BONUS as a Community trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Zitro IP Sàrl to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Zitro IP Sàrl to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 262, 10.8.2015.

1

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency 

          - [FEMA-3275-EM] 

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of an emergency declaration for the State of Iowa (FEMA-3275-EM), dated March 30, 2007, and related determinations. 

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         April 24, 2007.                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Magda Ruiz, Disaster Assistance Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2705. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The notice of an emergency declaration for the                           ( print page 25326)                        State of Iowa is hereby amended to include the following areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the catastrophe declared an emergency by the President in his declaration of March 30, 2007:                 

Dickinson, Plymouth, and Woodbury Counties for emergency protective measures (Category B), including snow removal, under the Public Assistance program for any continuous 48-hour period during or proximate to the incident period.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund Program; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services Program; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance; 97.048, Individuals and Households Housing; 97.049, Individuals and Households Disaster Housing Operations; 97.050, Individuals and Households Program—Other Needs, 97.036, Public Assistance Grants; 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.)

R. David Paulison, 

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency. 

 [FR Doc. E7-8514 Filed 5-3-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110-10-P