alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(logo) Rialto CAPITAL

 

 

**2016 Annual Statement of ServicerCompliance (Item 1123)**

 

 

Pooling and ServicingAgreement (the “Pooling and Servicing Agreement”) dated as of March1, 2016 by and among Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Securities, Inc., asDepositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as General Master Servicer,Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC as General Special Servicer, National CooperativeBank, N.A. as NCB Master Servicer and NCB Special Servicer, Park Bridge LenderServices LLC as Operating Advisor and Asset Representations Reviewer, Wells FargoBank, National Association as Certificate Administrator, and Wilmington Trust,National Association as Trustee relating to the Wells Fargo Commercial MortgageTrust 2016-C33, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2016-C33 **(WFCM2016-C33)**

 

The undersigned, a dulyauthorized officer of Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as special servicer (the“Special Servicer”) herein certifies to the following:

 

1. All servicing activitiesand performance of such servicing activities under the Pooling and ServicingAgreement are performed on behalf of the Special Servicer.

 

2. A review of the servicing activities and performanceby the Special Servicer for the period of March 31, 2016 to December 31, 2016(the “Reporting Period”) in accordance with the Pooling andServicing Agreement has been conducted under my supervision.

 

3. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review,the Special Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the terms ofthe Pooling and Servicing Agreement, in all material respects for the ReportingPeriod and if there has been a failure to fulfill any such obligations in anymaterial respect, each failure and the nature and status thereof has beenspecifically identified herein.

 

 

Certified by: /s/ Adam Singer

Adam Singer, Managing Director

 

Date: March 1, 2017
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Commercial Mortgage  Servicing**D1050-084, 8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|--------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

Reference is hereby made tothat certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of May 1, 2016, by andamong CITIGROUP COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES INC., as Depositor, WELLS FARGOBANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, LNR PARTNERS, LLC, as SpecialServicer, PARK BRIDGE LENDER SERVICES, LLC, as Operating Advisor and AssetRepresentations Reviewer, CITIBANK N.A., as Certificate Administrator, andDEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS as Trustee, with respect to CommercialMortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2016-C1 (the "Agreement").Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meaningsassigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 10.08 ofthis Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of CommercialMortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1. A review of the activitiesof the Master Servicer during the period from May 1, 2016 through December 31,2016 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance per theAgreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and 

 

2. To the best of myknowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of itsobligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

  

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, theundersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2017.

 

 

/s/ Daniel Bober

Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President

Wells Fargo Bank

 

  

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll  go far |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------|
<PAGE>   1



                                                                    Exhibit 99.1


NEWS RELEASE

For further information contact:

Dailey J. Berard                                         Pete Roman
Chief Executive Officer                                  Chief Financial Officer
(318) 367-8291                                           (318) 373-5506

================================================================================

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
NOVEMBER 12, 1998


                           UNIFAB INTERNATIONAL, INC.
                             REPORTS SECOND QUARTER

New Iberia, LA - UNIFAB International, Inc. (NASDAQ: UFAB) today reported net
income of $1.7 million ($.38 per share) on revenue of $31.6 million for its
second quarter ended September 30, 1998, compared to net income of $1.5 million
($.33 per share) on revenues of $26.5 million for the second quarter ended
September 30, 1997.

Net income for the six months ended September 30, 1998 was $3.9 million ($.76
per share) on revenue of $60.3 million, compared to net income of $3.3 million
($.77 per share) on revenues of $60.3 million for the six months ended September
30, 1997. Net income for the periods ended September 30, 1998 include
acquisition expenses of $275,000 and an adjustment for deferred income taxes of
$525,000 associated with the acquisition of Allen Tank, Inc., which has been
accounted for as a pooling of interests.

Dailey J. Berard, UNIFAB International, Inc.'s President, CEO, and Chairman of
the Board noted, "The UNIFAB family of companies has grown significantly in the
last year and we continue to seek growth opportunities. The addition of Allen
Process Systems has significantly enhanced our product and service capabilities.
The development of our deep water facility in Lake Charles, Louisiana is
progressing as expected."

UNIFAB International, Inc. is an industry leader in the custom fabrication of
topsides facilities, equipment modules and other structures used in the
development and production of oil and gas reserves. In addition, the Company
designs and manufactures specialized process systems, refurbishes and retrofits
existing jackets and decks, provides repair, refurbishment and conversion
services for oil and gas drilling rigs and performs offshore piping hook-up and
platform maintenance services. Dailey Berard serves as a commissioner on a
number of committees and task forces that are working to improve training and
education of the workforce in Louisiana.
No. 46371.

#### Protests 980062-G/11688, etc., of Standard Oil Co. of Louisiana (New Orleans).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise is similar to that the subject of *Standard Oil Co. of Louisiana*v. *United States*(6 Cust. Ct. 237, C. D. 471) it was held that certain of the merchandise in question is dutiable at 10 percent under paragraph 1555 as claimed.
# C_2016364EN.01004001.xml

| 3.10.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 364/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.10.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 364/40

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 21 July 2016 — HD v Parliament

(Case F-136/15) (1)

((Civil service - Officials - Remuneration - Family allowances - Education allowance - Conditions for granting - Article 67(2) of the Staff Regulations - Deduction of an allowance of like nature received from other sources - Article 85 of the Staff Regulations - Recovery of undue payment))

(2016/C 364/48)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: HD (represented by: C. Bernard-Glanz, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: M. Ecker and L. Deneys, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment, first, of the Parliament’s decision to put the applicant’s situation into order as regards the allocation of the education allowance and, second, of the decision to recover the amounts which the applicant unduly received in that regard.

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders each party to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders each party to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 7, 11/1/2016, p. 38.

---
No. 53789.

protests 72540-K, etc. (New York).

#### Kraus Bros. & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

For the reasons stated in *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C. D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 40368.

#### Protest 959917-G of Ignaz Strauss & Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Sullivan, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of *Kwong*v. *United States*(T. D. 49409) the wooden stands in question were held dutiable separately at 335⁄8 percent under paragraph 412 as claimed.
# C_2016200EN.01002101.xml

| 6.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 200/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 200/21

---

Order of the General Court of 18 April 2016 — Zhang v EUIPO — K & L Ruppert Stiftung (Anna Smith)

(Case T-295/15) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU word mark Anna Smith - Earlier EU word mark SMITH - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law))

(2016/C 200/29)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Yongyu Zhang (Manchester, United Kingdom) (represented by: M. Steinert, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) (represented by: S. Hanne, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO intervening before the General Court: K & L Ruppert Stiftung & Co. Handels-KG (Weilheim, Germany) (represented by: A. Kockläuner and O. Nilgen, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO intervening before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 27 February 2015 (Case R 1559/2014-5) concerning opposition proceedings between K & L Ruppert Stiftung & Co. Handels-KG et M. Yongyu Zhang.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Mr Yongyu Zhang to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Yongyu Zhang to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 262, 10.8.2015.

1

---
110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 198 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Whereas poverty can be seen as a deep, structural problem 

that implicates our value system and our educational and 

economic institutions; 

Whereas poverty may be defined as the lack of basic necessities of life such as food, shelter, clothing, health care, 

education, security, and opportunity; 
2 

•HCON 198 EH 

Whereas policy initiatives addressing poverty have not kept 

pace with the needs of millions of Americans; 

Whereas many experts believe that the lack of an equitable 

distribution of housing choices across the country leads 

to isolation and concentrated poverty; 

Whereas the number of Americans living in poverty has risen 

by over 5,000,000 since 2000; 

Whereas there were 37 million Americans living in poverty in 

2005; 

Whereas the official poverty rate in 2005 was 12.6 percent; 

Whereas 24.9 percent of African Americans, 21.8 percent of 

Hispanics, 25.3 percent of Native Americans, 10.9 percent of Asian Americans, and 8.3 percent of Whites lived 

in poverty in the United States in 2005; 

Whereas in 2005 a family of 4 was considered poor under the 

U.S. Census Bureau’s official measure if the family’s income was below $19,971; 

Whereas the poverty rate for children 18 years and younger 

(17.6 percent) remained higher than that of 18–24 yearolds (11.1 percent) and that of people 65 and older (10.1 

percent) in 2005; and 

Whereas the number in poverty increased for people 65 and 

older by almost 400,000 since 2000: Now, therefore, be 

it 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that the 
3 

•HCON 198 EH 

1 United States should set a national goal of cutting poverty 

2 in half over the next 10 years. 

Passed the House of Representatives January 22, 

2008. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 198 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of Congress that the United 

wise in poverty. that are impoverished, disadvantaged or otherneeds of those persons, groups and communities States has a moral responsibility to meet the
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-1051

RICARDO ERNESTO MANOSALVA-PENA, Petitioner,

v. MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.

Submitted: November 19, 2008 Decided: December 4, 2008

Before TRAXLER and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Aroon Roy Padharia, Falls Church, Virginia, for Petitioner. Gregory G. Katsas, Assistant Attorney General, Daniel E. Goldman, Senior Litigation Counsel, Andrew B. Insenga, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Ricardo Ernesto Manosalva-Pena, a native and citizen of Peru, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) dismissing his appeal from the immigration judge’s decision, which found him removable as an

alien convicted of a crime of domestic violence and as an aggravated felon and ordered him removed to Peru. Before this court, Manosalva-Pena contends that the Board erred in finding that he was convicted of an aggravated felony. Based on our review of the record, we agree that his third conviction under Virginia law for domestic assault and battery against a family member amounted to a “crime of violence” and was therefore an aggravated felony. See 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43)(F) (2006); 18 U.S.C. § 16(a) (2006). The Board therefore properly upheld the charge of removability on this ground. See 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2)(A)(iii) (2006); In re:

Manosalva-Pena (B.I.A. Aug. 22, 2007). Additionally, we reject Manosalva-Pena’s argument that he was improperly charged with removability as an aggravated felon under § 237(a)(2)(A)(iii) of the Immigration and Nationality Act. Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 80 (Thursday, April 26, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 20907]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-8021]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION


National Small Business Development Center Advisory Board; Public 
Meeting

    The U.S. Small Business Administration National Small Business 
Development Center Advisory Board will be hosting a public meeting via 
conference call to discuss such matters that may be presented by 
members, and the staff of the U.S. Small Business Administration or 
interested others. The conference call will take place on Tuesday, May 
15, 2007 at 1 p.m. Eastern Standard Time.
    The purpose of the meeting is to discuss the initial White Paper 
draft regarding management of the SBDC program, and arrangements for 
the Board site visit in June to visit the Ohio SBDC network in 
Columbus.
    Anyone wishing to make an oral presentation to the Board must 
contact Erika Fischer, Senior Program Analyst, U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Office of Small Business Development Centers, 409 3rd 
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20416, telephone (202) 205-7045 or fax 
(202) 481-0681.

Matthew Teague,
Committee Management Officer.
 [FR Doc. E7-8021 Filed 4-25-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
No. 47595.

#### Protests 4500-K, etc., of Hudson Steel & Tube Corp. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

It was stipulated that the electric generators in question are for use with bicycle lamps and are of the same character as those in *Wedemeyer*v. *United States*(7 Cust. Ct. 141, C. D. 556). In accordance therewith the claim at 30 percent under paragraph 371 was sustained.
Case No. 15,234a.

#### UNITED STATES v. The GORDON.

[N. Y. Times.]

District Court, S. D. New York.

Dec. 14, 1862.

Prize—Capture by Army and Navy—The Blockade.

This vessel was captured in Beaufort at the same time as the Alliance. She was also of American build, owned by the same owners in this country, and transferred at the same time to the same English claimants, and entered the port of Beaufort seven days after the Alliance, having knowledge of the blockade, and was loaded there prior to Sept. 14, 1861. and documented for departure in substantially the same manner. She brought there from Liverpool 4,300 sacks of salt, and 112 tons of iron. The master, Jennings, knew the port was blockaded, but says the first blockading vessel he. saw there was on Sept. 6 or 7. Most of her cargo was taken on board after that date. This master was put in command at Beaufort, after her former master, Gooding, left her. The steamer Nashville, coming in there, left a few days after the change, and Jennings says it was rumored that Gooding took command of the Nashville and went to sea in her, and he had not seen him since. One objection taken by the claimants was that at the time of the capture Beaufort was in the custody of the army of the United States, and a neutral vessel there was not subject to capture.

Mr. Upson and Mr. Andrews, for the United States and captors.

Mr. Edwards, for claimants.

HELD BY

THE COURT:

That the presumption from the fact is exceedingly cogent that the voyage was set on foot and prosecuted to its termination with full knowledge of the blockade and intent to invade it. No proof is found in the ship’s papers or in the *1372preparatory examinations repelling or displacing such presumption. That it is not shown that there was any co-operation between the laud and naval forces in the arrest of this vessel on this occasion, nor any concert even in the proceedings leading to that end; nor does the army make claim to any interest in the' capture. If the vessel and cargo were in delicto, and subject to condemnation for her acts, the claimants have no power to contest in the prize court the competency of the libel-ants alone to control the proceeds of the forfeiture. That Beaufort was an enemy port to the United States, and the acts of the vessel in going there and whilst in it were hostile to the United States, and impressed upon them the character of enemy property. That it is a legal cause of forfeiture for a neutral vessel to clothe herself in time of war with protective documents obtained from the enemy. That there is in these various particulars ample cause for condemnation of vessel and cargo. Decree accordingly.
Exhibit
31.1




I, Walker
R. Stapleton, certify that:




1.           I
have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of SonomaWest Holdings,
Inc.;




2.           Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;




3.           Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;




4.           The
registrant’s other certifying officers and I am responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:




(a)           Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;




(b)           Evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation;




(c)           Disclosed
in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and




5.           The
registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):




(a)           All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and




(b)           Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting.




Date:
February 19, 2008






/s/
Walker R.
Stapleton


Walker R.
Stapleton, President,
Chief


Executive
Officer and ChiefFinancial Officer