alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SAMSUNG NON-CIRCUMVENTION AGREEMENT


         This Agreement  ("Agreement")  is made this 15th day of April,  1999 by
and between Summus, Ltd. ("Summus") and High Speed Net Solutions ("HSNS").

         Whereas  Summus and HSNS have entered into an agreement  granting  HSNS
certain  exclusive and non-exclusive  rights,  and have entered into a letter of
intent  granting HSNS certain agent rights in connection with Samsung in certain
of Summus' products;

         Whereas  Summus  acknowledges  that HSNS has opened a  discussion  with
Samsung that may result to the mutual benefit of Summus and HSNS.

         NOW  THEREFORE,   in  consideration  of  the  mutual  covenants  herein
contained,  Summus and HSNS,  intending  to be legally  bound by the  provisions
hereof, hereby agree as follows:

         1.       Summus,  Ltd.,  its  principals,  employees,  associates,  and
                  agents shall not  independently  of High Speed Net  Solutions,
                  Inc.  ("HSNS"),  directly  or  indirectly,  pursue a  business
                  relationship   with  Samsung  related  to  Summus'   products,
                  technology,  or related intellectual  property for a period of
                  one (1) year beginning as of April 15th, 1999.

         2.       Summus, Ltd., shall be a signatory to all contracts pertaining
                  to Summus' products,  technology and intellectual  property in
                  the event such products,  technology and related  intellectual
                  property  are not within the rights  granted by the  Marketing
                  License  Agreement  effective as of March 31, 1999 ("Marketing
                  License Agreement").

         3.       Nothing in this Non-Circumvent Agreement will extend, limit or
                  otherwise  change the rights granted in the Marketing  License
                  Agreement.   In  the  event  of  a   conflict   between   this
                  Non-Circumvent  Agreement and the Marketing License Agreement,
                  the Marketing License Agreement shall take precedence.

Summus, Ltd.                                   High Speed Net Solutions, Inc.


/s/ Daniel Stansky                                ___________________________
Daniel Stansky                                 Myung K. Kim
Chief Operating Officer                        President
# C_2016326EN.01000603.xml

| 5.9.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.9.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/6

---

Appeal brought on 25 September 2015 by Roland SE against the judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) delivered on 16 July 2015 in Case T-631/14 Roland SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office

(Case C-515/15 P)

(2016/C 326/10)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Roland SE (represented by: C. Onken, Rechtsanwältin)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office

Other parties to the proceedings:

Christian Louboutin

By order of 14 April 2016 the Court (Ninth Chamber) dismissed the appeal.

---
No. 47582.

#### Protest 982041-G of Rathjen Brothers.

C. D-659. Motion of Government for rehearing denied.
(Reap. Dec. 9410)

#### United States *v.*Peerless Confectionery Equipment Co.

Entry No. CE 944270.

(Decided April 29, 1959)

*George Goelvran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the plaintiff.

Defendant not represented by counsel.

Lawrence, Judge:

This is a collector’s appeal for a reappraisement filed pursuant to the provisions of section 501 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. § 1501), as amended, relating to an importation of electrical machines from Western Germany.

The case has been submitted for decision upon the stipulation of the parties hereto wherein it was agreed that at the time of exportation of the involved merchandise such or similar merchandise was not freely offered for sale for home consumption in Germany or for exportation to the United States, or for sale in the United States, *619in accordance with the provisions of section 402(c), (d), and (e) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. § 1402(c), (d), and (e)), as amended. It was further stipulated and agreed that the cost of production of such merchandise, as defined in section 402(f) of said act (19 U.S.C. § 1402(f)), was as follows:

> Pkicb Each

> Item U.S. Ctjkbency

> Hansel 6 Roll Automatic Batch Rollers Model HKR, complete with all motors and controls, of 220 volts, 3 phase, 60 cycles-$1, 650

> Hansel Automatic Rope Sizing and Feeding Machines Model HZM, complete with all necessary motors and controls of 220 volts, 3 phase, 60 cycles, and weight controls device, equipped with heating elements of each 160 watt-$1,405

> Both items less pro rata share of invoiced inland freight

Upon the agreed facts of record, I find and hold that cost of production, as that value is defined in said section 402(f) of the Tariff Act of 1930, is proper basis of value for the machine in issue, and that said value is as indicated in the tabulation set forth in the preceding paragraph herein.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
(Reap. Dec. 8415)

Entry Nos. J-531; J-715.

#### United States *v.*Jno. G. McGiffin

(Decided April 15, 1955)

*Warren E. Burger,*Assistant Attorney General, for the plaintiff.

Defendant not represented by counsel.

Rao, Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation entered into by and between the respective parties hereto:

> IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED by the undersigned, subject to the approval of the Court, that at the time of the exportation of the wheat bran involved herein such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported in the *482usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States at Argentine Pesos 166 per M. Kgs., net weight, net packed, (Pesos advisory at “Basic” rate), in reappraisement No. 242327-A, and at Argentine Pesos 182 per M. Kgs., net weight, net packed, (Pesos advisory at “Basic” rate), in reappraisement No. 242330-A.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that there was no higher foreign value as defined in section 402 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, for the merchandise involved herein at the times of exportation thereof.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that this case may be submitted on the foregoing stipulation.

On the agreed facts, I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values were as follows:

> Argentine pesos per Reappraisement No. M. kgs. net weight

> 242327-A 166

> 242330-A 182

> net, packed (Pesos advisory at “basic” rate)

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
(Reap. Dec. 9409)

#### Plywood & Door Manufactorers Corporation v. United States

Entry No. 793065.

(Decided April 29, 1959)

*James Wilson Young*for the plaintiff.

*George Goehran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

*618Mollison, Judge:

Counsel for the parties have submitted the above-entitled appeal for reappraisement upon stipulation on the basis of which I find that export value, as defined in section 402(d), Tariff Act of 1930, is the proper basis for the determination of the value of the birch plywood exported from Finland in the year 1956 which is involved herein, and that such value is as set forth in column 5 of schedule “A,” attached to and made a part hereof.

Judgment will issue accordingly.

Schedule A

1. 2. 3. 4. 5.

Collector’s Entry Date of Value or Reappraisement No. No. No. export price

R58/278_ 10906 793065 10/15/56

Birch plywood as follows:

BJ/BB grade, *%”*thick, 60" x 48" BJ/WG grade, /s' thick, 62" x 62" 61" x 61" 60" x 60" Invoice unit values, net, less WG grade, *%i"*thick, 10^6" x 13%" ocean freight and insurance 13%" x *21%"*13 Tie" x 23^6" 16Ko" x 25 %" 16Kg" x 28%i"
Exhibit 13.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. Section 1350



In connection with the filing of the Annual
Report on Form 20-F for the period ended December 31, 2016 (the “Report”) by Cellect Biotechnology Ltd. (the "Company"),
the undersigned, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: March 23, 2017



| | /s/ Eyal Leibovitz            
| | ------------------------------
| | Name: Eyal Leibovitz          
| | Title: Chief Financial Officer
July 30, 2013

Mr. Mark Taylor

Rocky Mountain Rotors

P.O. Box 725

Belgrade, MT 59714

Dear Mr. Taylor :

This is in response to your June 25, 2013 letter sent to the public docket ( No. FAA

- 20 13

- 0580 ) petitioning the Federal Aviation Administration on behalf of Rocky Mountain Rotors

( RMR) for an exemption from part 120 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations ( 14 CFR)

. That exemption, if granted, would allow RMR to cover its safety

- sensitive employees under

one testing program

.

On July 15, 2013 , the FAA published th e Combined Drug and Alcohol Testing Programs

final r ule (78 FR 41999) relating to air carrier operators and commuter or on

- demand

operators that also conduct commercial air tour operations to combine the drug and alcohol

testing required for each operation into one testing program . A copy of this rule change is

enclosed for your information.

If you have any questions, please contact the FAAs Drug Abatement Division at (202) 267

- 8442 or drugabatement@faa.gov

. Because the relief you seek is now covered under the new

rule, we will take no further action on your petition.

Sincerely,

/s/

Ida M. Klepper

Manager, Airmen and

Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
No. 48091.

#### Protests 24016-K, etc., of J. L. Hammett Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise in question is the same in all material respects as the plasticine the subject of Abstract 47147 the claim at 20 percent under paragraph 1558 was sustained.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

This notice corrects a notice (FR Doc. E7-7874) published on pages 20549 and 20550 of the issue for Wedneday, April 25, 2007.

Under the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco heading, the entry for Frank W. Yuen, Nassau, Bahamas, is revised to read as follows:

**A. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco**                     (Tracy Basinger, Director, Regional and Community Bank Group) 101 Market Street, San Francisco, California 94105-1579:                

*1. Frank W. Yuen, Esq.*, San Francisco, California; to acquire control of Concord Place, Inc., Nassau, The Bahamas, and thereby indirectly acquire control of Los Angeles National Bank, Buena Park, California.                

Comments on this application must be received by May 10, 2007.

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, April 25, 2007.

Margaret McCloskey Shanks,

Associate Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. E7-8229 Filed 4-30-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v ROGER H. BERNER, Private First Class, U. S. Marine Corps, Appellant

12 USCMA 683, 31 CMR 269

No. 15,339

March 9, 1962

*Lieutenant Colonel M. G. Truesdale,*USMC, argued the cause for Appellant, Accused. With him on the brief was *Lieutenant Eric L. Keisman,*USNR.

*Lieutenant (jg) Conrad Alexander Buhler,*USNR, argued the cause for Appellee, United States. With him on the brief was *Lieutenant Colonel L. W. Martin,*USMC.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:

Upon his plea of guilty, accused was convicted by court-martial for various violations of the Uniform Code of Military Justice. This Court granted his petition for review on a single question concerning multiplicity.

From the record it would appear that consideration has not been given, at prior levels, to whether the count of accessory after the fact is, under the circumstances of the instant case, separate for punishment purposes from the offense of receiving stolen property. See United States v Tamas, 6 USCMA 502, 20 CMR 218.

The decision of the board of review, therefore, is reversed. The case is remanded to The Judge Advocate General of the Navy for reference to the board and appropriate action as to sentence not inconsistent with this opinion.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Valspar Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, William L. Mansfield, Chief Executive Officer of the Company and I, Lori A. Walker, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.

        The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934; and




2.

        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






/s/William L. MansfieldWilliam L. MansfieldChairman and Chief Executive OfficerSeptember 9, 2009/s/Lori A. WalkerLori A. WalkerSenior Vice President andChief Financial OfficerSeptember 9, 2009










---
Before the Second Division,

September 24, 1941

No. 46345.

#### Protest 50294-K of Saji Trading Co., Ltd. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

It appeared from the record that embroidered rayon wearing apparel was erroneously classified. The claim at 75 percent under paragraph 1529 (a) and T. D. 48316 was sustained as to the item in question.
EXHIBIT 23



|Analysis, Research & Planning Corporation's Consent
|---------------------------------------------------
|                                                   

Union Carbide Corporation:

Analysis,
Research & Planning Corporation ("ARPC") hereby consents to the use of ARPC's name and the reference to ARPC's reports dated January 9, 2003, January 26, 2004 and
January 26, 2005 appearing in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Union Carbide Corporation for the quarter ended March 31, 2005.



|/s/ B. THOMAS FLORENCEB. Thomas Florence
President
Analysis, Research & Planning Corporation
April 29, 2005 |  | 
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

25

---



QuickLinks
# C_2016454EN.01002001.xml

| 5.12.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 454/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.12.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 454/20

---

Order of the President of the Court of 22 September 2016 — European Commission v Republic of Austria, supported by: Federal Republic of Germany, Czech Republic

(Case C-1/15) (1)

(2016/C 454/35)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 73, 2.3.2015.

---
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v. CYRIL D. SAMUELS, Corporal, U. S. Army, Appellant

4 USCMA 698, 16 CMR 272

No. 4475

Decided September 24, 1954

Nathaniel Alper, Esq., Maj Edwin Doran, U. S. Army, and 1ST Lt Jack J. Albert, U. S. Army, for Appellant.

Lt Col William R. Ward, U. S. Army, 1st Lt Donald M. Sukloff, U. S. Army, and 1st Lt Benjamin C. Flannagan, U. S. Army, fob Appellee.

*699Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:

Upon approval by a board of review of his conviction of the wrongful use of a narcotic drug,1 the accused petitioned this Court, challenging the sufficiency of the evidence to support the finding.

The defense contests the scientific reliability of the Marquis, Frohde, and Mecke color reaction tests upon which identification of the drug was made. This issue is disposed of by our decision in United States v. Ford, 4 USCMA 611, 16 CMR 186, wherein we recognized both the reliability of such evidence and its sufficiency to support a finding of guilty.

The decision of the board of review is affirmed.

1

 Article 134, 50 USC § 728.
Before the First Division,

January 29, 1940

No. 43115.

#### Protests 999304-G, etc., of M. Pressner & Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel trick daggers composed entirely of metal and siren whistles and horns were held dutiable at 45 percent under paragraph 397 as claimed. Abstracts 37637, 39948, and 40480 followed. So-called cigarette whistles, noisemakers, or novelties in part of bamboo similar to those the subject of Abstract 39509 were held dutiable at 45 percent under paragraph 409.
February 29, 1968

No. 18,646.

#### United States v Alvin Jackson, PVT, U. S. Army (CM 412301).

Opinion rendered on Petition for Grant of Review on January 28, 1966. 15 USCMA 603, 36 CMR 101.

On consideration of the Petition for Writ in the Nature of Error

Coram Nobis filed herein and the reply thereto, and it' appearing to ■the Court that issues of mental re-spónsibility and capacity should -be determined at the trial level (United States v Thomas, 13 USCMA 163, 32 CMR 163 and United States v Schalck, 14 USCMA 371, 34 CMR 151), It is

*682ORDERED that said Petition be, and the same is, hereby granted and this ease is returned to the Judge Advocate General of the Army for remand to an appropriate convening authority for reference to a general court-martial to determine the mental responsibility of the accused at the time of the offense of which he stands convicted, his mental capacity at the time of the trial, and his present capacity to understand and participate in these and any further proceedings. See United States v DuBay, 17 USCMA 147, 37 CMR 411.
Case No. 13,969.

#### THOMPSON v. MILLIGAN.

[2 Cranch, C. C. 207.] 1

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

June Term, 1820.

Lotteries — Maryland Statute — District op Columbia — Note—Illegal Consideration.

It was not lawful, in 1812, in the District of Columbia, to sell lottery tickets, in the Potomac and Shenandoah Navigation Lottery, although the lottery was authorized by an act of the legislature of Maryland passed in 1809 [1 Dorsey’s Laws, 590]; and a note given for the purchase of such tickets, in 1812, being given for an unlawful consideration was void.

[Cited in Smith v. Chesapeake *&*O. Canal Co., Case No. 13,024.]

Assumpsit, upon the defendant’s promissory note for $2,422.50, given for the purchase of tickets in the second class of the Potomac and Shenandoah Navigation Lottery, authorized by an act of Maryland passed in 1809.

Mr. Jones, for defendant

[Joseph Milligan], contended that the sale of such tickets in this county is void as being contrary to the act of Maryland, 1792, c. 58'[1 Dorsey’s Laws, 288], adopted by the act of congress of 27th February, 1801 (2 Stat. 103), as decided by this court in Hawkins v. Cox [Case No. 6,-243], at June term, 1819.

Mr. Key, for plaintiff.

The plaintiff [Jonah Thompson] became non-suit.
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------


                         CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906
                                     OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Unico American
Corporation (the "Company") for the period ended June 30, 2007, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Erwin Cheldin, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
    the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



                    /s/  Erwin Cheldin
                    ------------------
           Name:    Erwin Cheldin
           Title:   Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer
           Date:    August 13, 2007




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Unico American Corporation, and
will be retained by Unico American Corporation, and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
November 30, 1967

No. 67-17.

#### Richard R. Hovish, AMN, U. S. Air Force.

ORDERED by the Court that said Petition be, and the same is, hereby denied without prejudice to raise *681the issues at the time of trial and on appeal should the case ever be appealed.