alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2015311EN.01004301.xml

| 21.9.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 311/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.9.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 311/43

---

Appeal brought on 21 July 2015 by John Dalli against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber, Extended Composition) delivered on 12 May 2015 in Case T-562/12: John Dalli v European Commission

(Case C-394/15 P)

(2015/C 311/46)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Appellant: John Dalli (represented by: L. Levi and S. Rodrigues, lawyers)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission

Other party to the proceedings:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The Appellant claims that the Court should:

| — | declare his appeal admissible; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare his appeal admissible;

| — | annul the contested judgment; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested judgment;

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order compensation for damage of 1 symbolic euro for non-material damage and, on a provisional basis, of EUR 1 9 13  396 for material damage; |
| --- | --- |

—

order compensation for damage of 1 symbolic euro for non-material damage and, on a provisional basis, of EUR 1 9 13  396 for material damage;

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of his appeal, the Appellant raises:

| — | a first plea in law, alleging that the General Court ruled ultra petita by changing the subject-matter of the dispute; |
| --- | --- |

—

a first plea in law, alleging that the General Court ruled ultra petita by changing the subject-matter of the dispute;

ultra petita

| — | a second plea in law, alleging a failure to provide reasons; |
| --- | --- |

—

a second plea in law, alleging a failure to provide reasons;

| — | a third plea in law, alleging a breach of procedure which adversely affects the interests of the Appellant, including his rights of defence; |
| --- | --- |

—

a third plea in law, alleging a breach of procedure which adversely affects the interests of the Appellant, including his rights of defence;

| — | a fourth plea in law, raising several distortions of facts and evidence; and |
| --- | --- |

—

a fourth plea in law, raising several distortions of facts and evidence; and

| — | a fifth plea in law, challenging the interpretation or application of European Union law by the General Court. |
| --- | --- |

—

a fifth plea in law, challenging the interpretation or application of European Union law by the General Court.

---
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 219 

Expressing the sense of Congress that the Government of Iraq should schedule 

a referendum to determine whether or not the people of Iraq want 

the Armed Forces of the United States to be withdrawn from Iraq 

or to remain in Iraq until order is restored to the country. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 25, 2007 

Mr. ROHRABACHER submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of Congress that the Government of 

Iraq should schedule a referendum to determine whether 

or not the people of Iraq want the Armed Forces of 

the United States to be withdrawn from Iraq or to 

remain in Iraq until order is restored to the country. 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that as soon 

3 as practicable after the submission to Congress of the sec4 ond report required by section 1314(b)(2) of the U.S. 

5 Troop Readiness, Veterans’ Care, Katrina Recovery, and 

6 Iraq Accountability Appropriations Act, 2007 (Public Law 

7 110–28; relating to the Iraqi Government’s record of perVerDate Aug 31 2005 04:13 Sep 26, 2007 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\HC219.IH HC219

hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS
2 

•HCON 219 IH 

1 formance on its benchmarks), the Government of Iraq 

2 should schedule a referendum to determine whether or not 

3 the people of Iraq want the Armed Forces of the United 

4 States to be withdrawn from Iraq or to remain in Iraq 

5 until order is restored to the country. 

Æ 


hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 

          - [Docket No. RP07-325-000] 

Take notice that the Commission will convene a technical conference in the above referenced proceeding on Friday, May 4, 2007, at 10 a.m. (EDT), in a room to be designated at the offices of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. 

                    The Commission's March 29, 2007 order [1]                                          directed that a technical conference be held to address the issues raised by a March 1, 2007 filing of Equitrans, L.P. (Equitrans) to institute a surcharge to recover certain costs incurred by Equitrans under the Pipeline Safety Improvement Act of 2002 (PSIA).                 

The parties and the Commission Staff will have the opportunity to discuss all of the issues raised by the filing including, but not limited to, the validity of the costs Equitrans seeks to recover and the underlying support for these costs. 

                    FERC conferences are accessible under section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. For accessibility accommodations please send an e-mail to                     *accessibility@ferc.gov*                     or call toll free (866) 208-3372 (voice) or 202-502-8659 (TTY), or send a fax to 202-208-2106 with the required accommodations.                 

                    All interested persons are permitted to attend. For further information please contact Lisa T. Long by phone at (202) 502-8691 or via e-mail at                     *lisa.long@ferc.gov*.                 

Kimberly D. Bose, 

Secretary. 

# Footnotes

1.                                                     *Equitrans, L.P.*, 118 FERC ¶ 61,258 (2007).                     
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. E7-7988 Filed 4-25-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
# C_2017374EN.01002701.xml

| 6.11.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 374/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.11.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 374/27

---

Judgment of the General Court of 21 September 2017 — Novartis v EUIPO — Meda (Zimara)

(Case T-238/15) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU word mark Zimara - Earlier EU word mark FEMARA - Relative ground for refusal - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009 - Article 76(1) of Regulation No 207/2009 - Obligation to decide on the entirety of the appeal - First sentence of Article 64(1) of Regulation No 207/2009))

(2017/C 374/40)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Novartis AG (Basle, Switzerland) (represented by M. Douglas, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by H. O’Neill, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Meda AB (Solna, Sweden)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 6 March 2015 (Case R 636/2014-5) relating to opposition proceedings between Novartis and Meda.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 6 March 2015 (Case R 636/2014-5) in so far as the Board of Appeal failed to rule on the appeal before it as regards ‘veterinary preparations’; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 6 March 2015 (Case R 636/2014-5) in so far as the Board of Appeal failed to rule on the appeal before it as regards ‘veterinary preparations’;

| 2. | Dismisses the remainder of the action; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the remainder of the action;

| 3. | Orders each party to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders each party to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 228, 13.7.2015.

1

---
**Exhibit
        32.2**
 
 
 
 Certification
        of CFO Pursuant to
 18
        U.S.C.
        Section 1350,
 As
        Adopted Pursuant to
 Section
        906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 
 
 In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of U.S. Energy Corp. (the "Company")
        on
        Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities
        and Exchange Commission on November 14, 2006 (the "Report"), Robert Scott
        Lorimer, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant
        to
        18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
        Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:
 
 (1)  The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)  The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 
 
 
 
 /s/
                  Robert Scott LorimerRobert
                  Scott Lorimer,Chief
                  Financial OfficerNovember
                  14, 2006
 
 
 This
        certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
        Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
        purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
        amended.
 
 A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
        to
        U.S. Energy Corp. and will be retained by U.S. Energy Corp. and furnished
        to the
        Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
(Reap. Dec. 8396)

Entry No. 1443.

#### J. T. Steeb & Co., Inc. *v.*United States

(Decided March 4, 1955)

*Lawrence & Tuttle*for the plaintiff.

*Warren B. Burger,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

OliveR, ' Chief Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> It is hereby stipulated as follows concerning the merchandise referred to below:

> 1) Said merchandise consists of binoculars and leather carrying cases which in Herber v. US, CD 1519, this court held to be subject to appraisement separately according to the value of each class of articles.

> 2) At the time of exportation of such merchandise to the United States, the price at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities in the ordinary course of trade for exportation to the *463United States, the foreign value of such or similar merchandise being no higher, is as follows in US currency; net packed:

> 1 lot of 4 cases each containing 25 sets of 7 x 50 binoculars with carrying eases; their said export value in US dollars, net packed, being:

> Binoculars, each_$22. 19

> Carrying cases, each_ 2. 81

> 3) Upon this stipulation this case may be deemed to be submitted for decision.

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values were as follows:

United States dollars

1 lot of 4 cases each containing 25 sets of 7 x 50 binoculars with carrying cases: per each

Binoculars_ __ 22. 19

Carrying cases_ 2.81 net packed

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
Before the Second Division,

August 25, 1939

No. 41991.

#### Protest 645709-G of Salem Shawiry (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

It was stipulated that the laces in question are similar to those involved in *Amrein*v. *United States*(T. D. 49551). The claim at 75 percent under paragraph 1430 was therefore sustained.
(Reap. Dec. 8854)

#### Barnett International Fders., Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 849169.

(Decided June 20, 1957)

*Siegel, Mandell & Davidson*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Mollison, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> *703IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the parties hereto, subject to the approval of the Court, that at the time of exportation of the merchandise embraced in the entry covered by the Appeal to Reappraisement noted above, there was no foreign value, export value or United States value, as defined in Section 402 (c) (d) (e) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, for such or similar merchandise;

> That cost of production is the proper basis of value;

> That the cost of production of said merchandise as defined in Section 402 (f) is equivalent to the invoice unit values, packed, and that there was no higher value;

> That the appeal to reappraisement herein may be submitted for decision on the foregoing stipulation.

On the agreed facts I find the cost of production, as that value is defined in section 402 (f) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values were the invoice unit values, packed.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
```

[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 83 (Tuesday, May 1, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 23833-23834]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-8292]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Toxicology Program (NTP); Center for the Evaluation of 
Risks to Human Reproduction (CERHR); Second Bisphenol A Expert Panel 
Meeting and Interim Draft Expert Panel Report on Bisphenol A: 
Announcement of Postponed Meeting and Extension of Public Comment 
Period

AGENCY: National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS); 
National Institutes of Health.

ACTION: Announcement of postponed meeting and extension of public 
comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The second meeting of the expert panel on bisphenol A 
originally scheduled for May 21-23, 2007 [Federal Register, April 2, 
2007 (Vol. 72, No. 62, page 15695-15696)] is postponed. The new date 
for the meeting will be announced in a future Federal Register notice. 
During this time, NTP will conduct an independent audit of all 
materials used in the bisphenol-A review. Also, the deadline for 
submission of written public comments on the interim draft expert panel 
report on bisphenol A is extended until June 20, 2007. The interim 
draft report is posted on the CERHR Web site (http://cerhr.niehs.nih.gov/chemicals/bisphenol/bisphenol.html) and available 
in printed text from CERHR (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT below). 
Persons submitting written comments are asked to include their name and 
contact information [affiliation (if applicable), mailing address, 
telephone, e-mail, and sponsoring organization (if

[[Page 23834]]

any)] and send the comments to Dr. Michael D. Shelby (see ADDRESSES 
below). Comments received will be posted on the CERHR Web site.

DATES: Written comments on the interim draft expert panel report should 
be received by June 20, 2007.

ADDRESSES: Comments on the interim draft report should be sent to Dr. 
Michael D. Shelby, CERHR Director, NIEHS, P.O. Box 12233, MD EC-32, 
Research Triangle Park, NC 27709 (mail), (919) 316-4511 (fax), or 
[email protected] (e-mail). Courier address: CERHR, 79 T.W. 
Alexander Drive, Building 4401, Room 103, Research Triangle Park, NC 
27709.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Michael D. Shelby, CERHR Director, 
919-541-3455, [email protected].

    Dated: April 23, 2007.
Samuel H. Wilson,
Deputy Director, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences 
and National Toxicology Program.
 [FR Doc. E7-8292 Filed 4-30-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
```
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v. HAROLD J. C. LEFFEW, Sergeant First Class, U. S. Army, Appellant

4 USCMA 585, 16 CMR 159

*586No. 4362

Decided July 30, 1954

Lt Col George M. Thorpe, U. S. Army, for Appellant.

Lt Col William R. Ward, U. S. Army, and 1st Lt William G. Fowler, U. S. Army, for Appellee.

Opinion of the Court

Robert E. Quinn, Chief Judge:

In this case, as in United States v. Best, 4 USCMA 581, 16 CMR 155, decided this date, the Govern  ment has moved to dismiss  the accused’s petition for  review on the ground that it was filed prematurely. The accused was tried in a common trial with Best, and convicted of the same offenses. On appeal, the board of review took the same action with respect to him as it did with Best.

For the reasons set out in our opinion in United States v. Best, supra, the motion to dismiss is granted. However, here as in the Best case, the dismissal is without prejudice to the filing of a new petition upon completion of the review by the board of review. The case is returned to The Judge Advocate General of the Army for action consistent with this opinion.

Judges Latimer and Brosman concur.
July 9, 2015

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

AMIR A. CHAMIE, Appellant

NO. 14-14-00213-CV V.

MEMORIAL HERMANN HEALTH SYSTEM D/B/A UNIVERSITY PLACE 

RETIREMENT HOME, Appellee

________________________________

This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of appellee, Memorial 

Hermann Health System d/b/a University Place Retirement Home, signed January 

16, 2014, was heard on the transcript of the record. We have inspected the record 

and find error in the judgment. We therefore order the judgment of the court below 

REVERSED and REMAND the cause for proceedings in accordance with the 

court’s opinion.

We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by 

appellee, Memorial Hermann Health System d/b/a University Place Retirement 

Home.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
III 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 343 

Expressing the sense of the Senate that the week of December 19, 2005 

should be designated ‘‘Thank Our Defenders Week’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 21, 2005 

Mr. SESSIONS submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 

agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the Senate that the week of December 19, 2005 should be designated ‘‘Thank Our Defenders Week’’. 

Whereas, ever since our Nation was founded, the members of 

our military, soldiers, sailors, airmen, marines, Coast 

Guard personnel, active duty, Guard, and reserve, have 

played a critical role protecting America’s vital interests 

and spreading peace throughout the world; 

Whereas more than 193,000 troops in the Persian Gulf region are courageously fighting insurgents and helping to 

establish democracies in Iraq and Afghanistan; 

Whereas 19,000 servicemen and servicewomen are stationed 

in Afghanistan, fighting Al-Qaeda and providing security 

for the people of that fledgling nation; 
2 

•SRES 343 ATS

Whereas over 30,000 troops are protecting American interests and maintaining peace on the Korean peninsula; 

Whereas, in total, nearly 300,000 brave men and women are 

actively serving on the soil of 120 foreign countries and 

on the high seas, fighting terrorists and making sacrifices 

for American citizens and families; and 

Whereas, thanks to their tireless efforts, a brutal dictatorship 

in Iraq and an oppressive regime in Afghanistan have 

given way to emerging democratic societies: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That with gratitude it is the sense of the 

2 Senate that the week of December 19, 2005 should be des3 ignated ‘‘Thank Our Defenders Week.’’ 

Æ
Johnson, Dastina - Boise, ID

Subject: 'eNewsbytes'- The Inside Scoop: Personnel Actions for January 

Page 1 of 2

2/21/2007

The Inside Scoop!

Personnel Actions for January

 

PROMOTIONS

 

Sue Ellis – Career Ladder Promotion, Human Resources Specialist – Boise State Office, 

effective 01/21/2007 

 

Janet Jacobs – Career Ladder Promotion, Human Resources Assistant – Boise State 

Office, effective 01/21/2007 

Carrie Treccani – Temporary Promotion, from Soil Conservationist (Moscow Field 

Office) to District Conservationist – Orofino Field Office, effective 01/21/2007 

 

Mary Jennings – Career Ladder Promotion, Soil Conservation Technician, Rigby Field 

Office, effective 01/07/2007 

 

RETIREMENTS

Bruce Hanson – District Conservationist – Orofino Field Office, effective 01/03/2007

Peter Sinclair – District Conservationist – Marsing Field Office, effective 01/06/2007 

(preliminary disability)

Clayton Erickson – Civil Engineering Technician – Pocatello Field Office, effective 

01/03/2007

Ralph Fisher – Agronomist – Boise State Office, effective 01/03/2007

 

All eNewsbytes are archived online at http://www.id.nrcs.usda.gov/news/ebytes.html for

viewing anytime. 

 

 
Page 2 of 2

2/21/2007
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site.(Historical purposes)
**Title: Victorytimes**
 
SuDoc: D1.120/2:
Item Number: 0306-A-49(online)
CGP systemNumber: 000614553
 
061108.pdf
061308.pdf
061608.pdf
061808.pdf
062008.pdf
062308.pdf
063008.pdf
071108.pdf
071808.pdf
072508.pdf
072808.pdf
080108.pdf
080408.pdf
080708.pdf
081108.pdf
081508.pdf
082208.pdf
082508.pdf
082908.pdf
090108.pdf
09052008.pdf
09082008.pdf
09122008.pdf
09152008.pdf
09192008.pdf
09262008.pdf
09292008.pdf
10032008.pdf
10062008.pdf
10102008.pdf
10202008.pdf
10242008.pdf
10272008.pdf
12032008.pdf
 
 
October 23, 2017