alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2016222EN.01001601.xml

| 20.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 222/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 222/16

---

Judgment of the General Court of 10 May 2016 — Germany v Commission

(Case T-47/15) (1)

((State aid - Renewable energy - Aid granted by certain provisions of the amended German law concerning renewable energy sources (EEG 2012) - Aid supporting renewable electricity and reduced EEG surcharge for energy-intensive users - Decision declaring the aid partially incompatible with the internal market - Concept of State aid - Advantage - State resources))

(2016/C 222/18)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Federal Republic of Germany (represented initially by T. Henze and K. Petersen, and subsequently by T. Henze and K. Stranz, acting as Agents, and by T. Lübbig, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented initially by T. Maxian Rusche and R. Sauer, and subsequently by T. Maxian Rusche and K. Herrmann, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU for the annulment of Commission Decision (EU) 2015/1585 of 25 November 2014 on the aid scheme SA.33995 (2013/C) (ex 2013/NN) (implemented by Germany for the support of renewable electricity and of energy-intensive users) (OJ 2015 L 250, p. 122).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the Federal Republic of Germany to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Federal Republic of Germany to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 127, 20.4.2015.

---
No. 45177.

#### Protests 41462-K, etc., of Netti Wholesale et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of *Locatelli*v. *United States*(T. D. 48284) it was held that an allowance of 2)4 percent should have been made in the weight of the cheese to compensate for the inedible coverings.
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Brett D. Davis, certify that:

 

1.                                      I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of CNH Equipment Trust 2016-A (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

 

2.                                      Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.                                      Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4.                                      I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

 

5.                                      All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Citibank, N.A.

 

March 29, 2017

 

 
|   | By:    | /s/ Brett D. Davis                                               |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Name:  | Brett D. Davis                                                   |
|   | Title: | President (senior   officer in charge of the servicing function) |

 

----
ANTHONY JAWORSKI, Plaintiff,

v. UNITED STATES TREASURY, Defendant. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Civil Action No. 13-395 (CKK)

MEMORANDUM OPINION (January 31, 2014) On January 7, 2014, the Defendant filed a [29] Motion to Dismiss this case. The same day, this Court issued an Order to the Plaintiff, warni ng him that if he failed to file a response to the Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss by January 25, 2014, the Court would treat the Motion to Dismiss as conceded and dismiss the case. See Order (Jan. 7, 2014), ECF No. [30] . As of the date of this Memorandum Opinion, the public docket reflects that the Plaintiff has not filed a response to the Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss. Accordingly, it is, this 31st day of January, 2014, hereby ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. SO ORDERED. /s/ COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY United States District Judge
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Operating Officer of VSE Corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify that to the best of the undersigned's knowledge:








1) the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2016 (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2) the information contained in the Company's Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date: October 27, 2016/s/ M. A. GauthierM. A. GauthierChief Executive Officer, Presidentand Chief Operating Officer
3 Attachments 

Here are the Class I impact modeling files you requested. Save the files to a local disk, and then change the 

suffix from zi_ to zip, and you should be able to access the contents of the zip files.

Gary

From: W. David Jenkins [mailto:djenkins@apexpowergroup.com] 

Sent: Monday, March 05, 2012 12:44 PM 

To: zimpfer.amy@epa.gov; 'Gerardo Rios'; 'Roger Kohn'; Holladay.Cleveland@epamail.epa.gov;

Walters.Julie@epamail.epa.gov

Cc: 'Foster, Melissa A.'; 'Gary R. Chandler'; Gary Rubenstein; Steve Hill 

Subject: Pio Pico Energy Center PSD - Meeting Confirmation

 

All, 

 

RE: Pio Pico Energy Center PSD - Meeting Confirmation 

Gary Rubenstein 

to: 

Gerardo Rios, Roger Kohn, Cleveland Holladay, Julie Walters 

03/07/2012 12:25 PM 

Cc: 

Gary Rubenstein, Steve Hill 

Hide Details 

From: Gary Rubenstein <GRubenstein@sierraresearch.com>

To: Gerardo Rios/R9/USEPA/US@EPA, Roger Kohn/R9/USEPA/US@EPA, Cleveland 

Holladay/R9/USEPA/US@EPA, Julie Walters/R9/USEPA/US@EPA 

Cc: Gary Rubenstein <GRubenstein@sierraresearch.com>, Steve Hill 

<SHill@sierraresearch.com>

image001.png PPEC_aermod_Part2.zi_ PPEC_aermod_Part1.zi_

Page 1 of 2

file://C:\Documents and Settings\chollada\Local Settings\Temp\notesDF63F8\~web9891.h... 3/26/2012
I would like to confirm our meeting set for 11:00am PT this Wednesday, March 7th at EPA Region 9. Here are the 

items that the PPEC team would like to discuss with you: 

 

1. SDCAPCD update 

2. CEC Workshop and process update 

3. PPEC Response to USFWS Letter and ESA process update 

4. GHG BACT Analysis update 

5. Data Request status 

6. PSD process update and anticipated Draft Permit date 

 

Gary Chandler, Missy Foster, Steve Hill, Gary Rubenstein, and I plan to attend. I appreciate your continued 

efforts on the PPEC PSD permit and your willingness to meet with us. 

 

Best regards, 

 

Dave 

 

 

 David Jenkins 

 317.431.1004 

 djenkins@apexpowergroup.com

 

Page 2 of 2

file://C:\Documents and Settings\chollada\Local Settings\Temp\notesDF63F8\~web9891.h... 3/26/2012
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                       UGI UTILITIES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
        COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES - EXHIBIT 12.1
                             (THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                 Six
                                                Months
                                                Ended                  Year Ended September 30,
                                               March 31,    ----------------------------------------------
                                                 2003         2002         2001         2000         1999
                                               --------     --------     --------     --------     -------
<S>                                            <C>          <C>          <C>          <C>          <C>
EARNINGS:

Earnings before income taxes                   $ 93,803     $ 73,665     $ 79,568     $ 82,882     $63,139
Interest expense                                  8,367       16,365       18,724       18,135      17,317
Amortization of debt discount and expense           109          287          264          218         215
Interest component of rental expense                729        1,563        1,541        1,318       1,539
                                               --------     --------     --------     --------     -------
                                               $103,008     $ 91,880     $100,097     $102,553     $82,210
                                               ========     ========     ========     ========     =======

FIXED CHARGES:

Interest expense                               $  8,367     $ 16,365     $ 18,724     $ 18,135     $17,317
Amortization of debt discount and expense           109          287          264          218         215
Allowance for funds used during
   construction (capitalized interest)               34           19           12           17          36
Interest component of rental expense                729        1,563        1,541        1,318       1,539
                                               --------     --------     --------     --------     -------
                                               $  9,239     $ 18,234     $ 20,541     $ 19,688     $19,107
                                               ========     ========     ========     ========     =======

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                11.15         5.04         4.87         5.21        4.30
                                               ========     ========     ========     ========     =======
</TABLE>
# C_2016191EN.01002701.xml

| 30.5.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 191/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.5.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 191/27

---

Judgment of the General Court of 14 April 2016 — Henkell & Co. Sektkellerei v EUIPO — Ciacci Piccolomini d’Aragona di Bianchini (PICCOLOMINI)

(Case T-20/15) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU word mark PICCOLOMINI - Earlier EU word mark PICCOLO - No genuine use of the earlier mark - Article 42(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2016/C 191/34)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Henkell & Co. Sektkellerei KG (Wiesbaden, Germany) (represented by: J. Flick, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Kusturovic and A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Ciacci Piccolomini d’Aragona di Bianchini Società Agricola (Milan, Italy) (represented by F. Cecchi, P. Pozzi and F. Ghisletti Giovanni, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 31 October 2014 (Case R 2265/2013-1), relating to opposition proceedings between Henkell & Co. Sektkellerei KG and Ciacci Piccolomini d’Aragona di Bianchini Società Agricola.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Henkell & Co. Sektkellerei KG to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) and by Ciacci Piccolomini d’Aragona di Bianchini Società Agricola. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Henkell & Co. Sektkellerei KG to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) and by Ciacci Piccolomini d’Aragona di Bianchini Società Agricola.

---

(1)  OJ C 89, 16.3.2015.

1

---
# C_2018301EN.01002401.xml

| 27.8.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 301/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.8.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 301/24

---

Judgment of the General Court of 11 July 2018 — Buonotourist v Commission

(Case T-185/15) (1)

((State aid - Undertaking operating networks of bus routes in the Regione Campania - Advantage - Service of general economic interest - Compensation for tariff obligations as a result of public service obligations, paid following a decision of a court ruling at final instance - Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market - Existing aid and new aid - Regulation (EEC) No 1191/69 - Conditions for exemption from the requirement for notification - Article 4(5) and Article 7(6) of Regulation (EC) No 659/99 - Respective jurisdictions of the Commission and the national courts in respect of the monitoring of State aid - Force of res judicata of a judgment of a higher national court - Temporal application of the rules of substantive law - Legitimate expectations - Legal certainty))

(2018/C 301/31)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Buonotourist Srl (Castel San Giorgio, Italy) (represented by: G. Capo and L. Visone, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Armati, G. Conte and P.-J. Loewenthal, agents)

Intervener in support of the applicant: Associazione Nazionale Autotrasporto Viaggiatori (ANAV) (Rome, Italy)(represented by: M. Malena, lawyer)

Re:

Application based on Article 263 TFEU and seeking annulment of Commission Decision (EU) 2015/1075 of 19 January 2015 on State aid SA.35843 (2014/C) (ex 2012/NN) implemented by Italy — Additional public service compensation for Buonotourist (OJ 2015 L 179, p. 128)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Buonotourist Srl, in addition to bearing its own costs, to pay those incurred by the European Commission; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Buonotourist Srl, in addition to bearing its own costs, to pay those incurred by the European Commission;

| 3. | Declares that the Associazione Nazionale Autotrasporto Viaggiatori (ANAV) is to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Declares that the Associazione Nazionale Autotrasporto Viaggiatori (ANAV) is to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 190,8.6.2015.

---
# C_2016191EN.01005402.xml

| 30.5.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 191/54 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.5.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 191/54

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 18 April 2016 — Glowacz-De-Chevilly v Commission

(Case F-72/15) (1)

1

(2016/C 191/80)

Language of the case: French

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 279, 24/8/2015, p. 55.

1

---
# Title

# 2012-2013 BOR_Summary

# Total, Dissolved Nutrients

# Chlorophyll

# BOD
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This Schedule Contains Summary Financial Information Extracted From The
Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements As Of September 30, 1998
And For The Nine Months Then Ended And Is Qualified In Its Entirety By
Reference To Such Financial Statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-30-1998
<CASH>                                           14612
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   136012
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     991271
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1327504
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                         421955
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           137
<OTHER-SE>                                      501853
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1327504
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1084028
<CGS>                                           862468
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   980180
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               31112
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  62871
<INCOME-TAX>                                     15788
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              47083
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   3026
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     44057
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     3.52
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     3.26
        

</TABLE>
# C_2017129EN.01001203.xml

| 24.4.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 129/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.4.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 129/12

---

Order of the President of the Court of 26 January 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Audiencia Provincial de Cantabria — Spain) — Luca Jerónimo García Almodóvar, Catalina Molina Moreno v Banco de Caja España de Inversiones, Salamanca y Soria, SAU

(Case C-554/15) (1)

1

(2017/C 129/16)

Language of the case: Spanish

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 27, 25.1.2016.

1

---
EXHIBIT 32.1

                                                                   ------------

                             UNITED-GUARDIAN, INC.
               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of  United-Guardian,  Inc. (the
"Registrant") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending June 30, 2003, as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Alfred R. Globus,  Chief Executive  Officer of the  Registrant,  hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

    (1) the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section  13(a) or
        15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects,  the financial  condition  and  result  of  operations  of the
        Company.

November 11, 2003                         /s/ Alfred R. Globus
                                          ---------------------------
                                          Alfred R. Globus
                                          Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 31.2

I, Edward P. Mooney, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Trinity
     Learning Corporation;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
     statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
     necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
     under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
     the period covered by this report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this report, fairly present in all material
     respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
     of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
     report;

4.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
     establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
     defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
     registrant and have:

     a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
          disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
          supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
          registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
          known to us by others within those entities, particularly during
          the period in which this report is being prepared;

     b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
          controls and procedures and presented in this report our
          conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
          and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
          report based on such evaluation; and

     c)   disclosed in this report any change in internal control over
          financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
          recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
          reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting;

5.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
     on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
     reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
     registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
     functions):

     a)   all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
          design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
          which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's
          ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
          information; and

     b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
          other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
          internal control over financial reporting.

Date: May 13, 2005                 /S/ EDWARD P. MOONEY
                                   -----------------------------------
                                   Edward P. Mooney
                                   President and Chief Financial Officer
Case No. 8,629a.

#### LYMAN v. NEVINS.

[Nowhere reported; opinion not now accessible.]
No. 44228.

#### Protest 925752-G of Philip Lien (New York).

*299Opinion by

Bbown, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is bodies, hoods, forms, or shapes similar to those the subject of *Cohn*v. *United States*(4 Cust. Ct. 166, C. D. 314). The protest was therefore sustained.