alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                              5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE NINE MONTHS
ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT
SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                           1,000
       
<S>                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                        SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                   54,148
<SECURITIES>                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                           567,713
<ALLOWANCES>                             19,410
<INVENTORY>                             472,555
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                      1,116,272
<PP&E>                                6,867,095
<DEPRECIATION>                        3,126,818
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        5,075,485
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   599,538
<BONDS>                               1,337,790
<COMMON>                                 69,640
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                                   0
<OTHER-SE>                            2,072,844
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>          5,075,485
<SALES>                               2,929,613
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                      2,929,613
<CGS>                                 2,182,609
<TOTAL-COSTS>                         2,699,532
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        (11,524)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       83,559
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         158,046
<INCOME-TAX>                             58,921
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      90,995<F1>
<DISCONTINUED>                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                             90,995
<EPS-PRIMARY>                              1.31
<EPS-DILUTED>                              1.31
<FN>
<F1> REFLECTS ADJUSTMENT FOR MINORITY INTEREST (NET OF TAX) OF $8,130
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          11,900
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  408,900
<ALLOWANCES>                                     9,900
<INVENTORY>                                    260,900
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               764,100
<PP&E>                                         796,200
<DEPRECIATION>                                 334,800
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,209,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          303,200
<BONDS>                                        300,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         8,400
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,285,300
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,209,000
<SALES>                                        317,300
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               317,300
<CGS>                                          128,600
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  128,600
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               147,400
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,600
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 34,700
<INCOME-TAX>                                     9,700
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             25,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    25,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .33
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .32
        

</TABLE>
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 175 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 24, 2007 

Received 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of Congress that courts with fiduciary 

responsibility for a child of a deceased member of the 

Armed Forces who receives a death gratuity payment 

under section 1477 of title 10, United States Code, 

should take into consideration the expression of clear 

intent of the member regarding the distribution of funds 

on behalf of the child. 

Whereas the death gratuity payable under section 1477 of 

title 10, United States Code, upon the death of a member 

of the Armed Forces, is intended to provide funds to 

meet the immediate needs of the survivors of the deceased member; 

Whereas such section designates the surviving spouse and 

any children of a deceased member as the highest 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

HCON 175 RDS 

and second highest priority, respectively, to receive the 

death gratuity payment; and 

Whereas a member with a child or children, but no spouse, 

usually designates another individual to be responsible for 

that child or children and may express a desire that such 

individual receive the death gratuity payment on behalf 

of the child or children: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that courts 

3 with fiduciary responsibility for a child of a deceased mem4 ber of the Armed Forces who receives a death gratuity 

5 payment under section 1477 of title 10, United States 

6 Code, should take into consideration the expression of 

7 clear intent of the member regarding the distribution of 

8 funds on behalf of the child. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 23, 2007. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 

By DEBORAH M. SPRIGGS, 

Deputy Clerk. 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
# C_2015107EN.01001901.xml

| 30.3.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 107/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.3.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 107/19

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Netherlands) lodged on 12 January 2015 — Staatssecretaris van Financiën; other party: Argos Supply Trading BV

(Case C-4/15)

(2015/C 107/26)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Hoge Raad der Nederlanden

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant in cassation: Staatssecretaris van Financiën

Other party: Argos Supply Trading BV

Question referred

In an examination of the economic conditions governing an outward processing customs procedure, must the term ‘Community processors’ in Article 148(c) of the Customs Code (1) be interpreted as also covering Community producers of basic products or intermediate products identical to those processed, as non-Community goods, in the processing operation?

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 of 12 October 1992 establishing the Community Customs Code (OJ 1992 L 302, p. 1).

---
DEPARTMENT .GF 

rRANSPORTATION , 

/.'•CKETOPtRATiONS 

?fiiO OCT - U -A .9: 2t f 

COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE 

Office of County Executive 

401 Mclntire Road 

Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 

(434) 296-5841 FAX (434) 296-5800 

August 16,2010 

The Honorable Ray LaHood 

Secretary of Transportation 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

RE: U.S. DOT Small Community Air Service Development Program 

Charlottesville-Albemarle Airport 

Charlottesville, VA 

Dear Mr. LaHood: 

I am pleased to submit this letter of support on behalf of the Charlottesville-Albemarle Airport 

Authority's (CHO) application to the U.S. Department of Transportation's Small Community Air Service 

Development Program (SCASDP). The Airport's grant application highlights the need to improve the 

quality of service and airfares at CHO and requests financial assistance to pursue new nonstop service to 

Chicago-O'Hare International Airport (ORD). The availability of quality, commercial air service has a 

profound impact on the region's economy through improved access for visitors but equally important, 

supports the needs of area businesses, organizations and educational institutions. 

I want to assure you that the County of Albemarle fially supports the purpose of a new nonstop air service 

to ORD. Where small community air service initiatives are concerned, it is community support like this 

thai can make a difference. We have every confidence that the program will have the full support of both 

the public and private siectors of our community. 

Sincerely, 

RWT,Jr/dbm 

10.034 

pbert W. Tucker, Jr 

Executive
110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 254 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Whereas on November 16, 1907, Oklahoma officially became 

the 46th State of the Union; 

Whereas prior to becoming a State, Oklahoma was designated 

as Indian Territory, providing a vibrant history and culture that continues to enrich the lives of its citizens; 
2 

•HCON 254 EH 

Whereas the State of Oklahoma was shaped by those adventurous and daring individuals who embraced the spirit of 

this great Nation as they opened the frontier of the 

American West; 

Whereas generations of proud people from all backgrounds 

have called Oklahoma their home and have contributed to 

its spirited history; 

Whereas these hearty and resilient people have defined what 

has come to be known as the spirit of Oklahoma through 

their strength, character, and persistent strides toward a 

bright future; 

Whereas the continued strength, initiative, and pursuit of excellence displayed by the citizens of the State of Oklahoma have produced its vibrant economy and secured it 

as a place of opportunity and progress now and for future generations; 

Whereas the solid foundation of family and community embraced by the citizens of Oklahoma has been a constant 

guide and source of strength to those citizens throughout 

its history and will remain so long into its future; 

Whereas the natural beauty and abundant resources of the 

State of Oklahoma support a quality of life for its citizens that is unsurpassed; and 

Whereas on November 16, 2007, the State of Oklahoma will 

begin a new century of statehood: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That the Congress recognizes and celebrates 

3 the centennial of Oklahoma statehood and wishes its peo-
3 

•HCON 254 EH 

1 ple another hundred years of continued growth, pros2 perity, and achievement. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 17, 

2007. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 254 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Recognizing and celebrating the centennial of 

Oklahoma statehood.
Electronically FiledIntermediate Court of Appeals2967230-JAN-201208:59 AM
### Part 1, **Section B, Item 2( c**  **) –**  **ID Method TS** **- C50**  **79 P**  **Page 5 a**
NO. 07-10-0185-CR

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL B

	FEBRUARY 18, 2011

	______________________________

	OMAR GUERRERO A.K.A. JUAN 

GUERRERO A.K.A. SALVADOR GUERRERO,

		Appellant

	v.

	THE STATE OF TEXAS, 

		Appellee

_______________________________

	FROM THE 108th DISTRICT COURT OF POTTER COUNTY;

	NO. 59,732-E; HON. DOUGLAS R. WOODBURN, PRESIDING

	_______________________________

***On Motion to Dismiss***

	_______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.

Appellant Omar Guerrero, by and through his attorney, has filed a motion to dismiss his appeal, signed by appellant, because he no longer desires to prosecute it.  Without passing on the merits of the case, we grant the motion to dismiss pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a) and dismiss the appeal.  Having dismissed the appeal at appellants request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

Do not publish.					Per Curiam
#### Drita MEMA, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 05-1302.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Aug. 24, 2005.

Decided: Sept. 15, 2005.

Drita Mema, Petitioner pro se. James Arthur Hunolt, Bryan Stuart Beier, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

*546Before WILKINSON, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Drita Mema, a native and citizen of Albania, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) affirming without opinion the immigration judge’s order denying her applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture. In her petition for review, Mema challenges the immigration judge’s determination that she failed to establish her eligibility for asylum. To obtain reversal of a determination denying eligibility for asylum, an alien “must show that the evidence he presented was so compelling that no reasonable factfinder could fad to find the requisite fear of persecution.” *INS v. Elias-Zacarias,*502 U.S. 478, 483-84, 112 S.Ct. 812, 117 L.Ed.2d 38 (1992). We have reviewed the evidence of record and conclude that Mema fails to show that the evidence compels a contrary result. Accordingly, we cannot grant the relief she seeks.

Nor can Mema show that she is entitled to withholding of removal under 8 U.S.C. § 1231(b)(3) (2000). “Because the burden of proof for withholding of removal is higher than for asylum—even though the facts that must be proved are the same—an applicant who is ineligible for asylum is necessarily ineligible for withholding of removal under [8 U.S.C.] § 1231(b)(3).” *Camara v. Ashcroft,*378 F.3d 361, 367 (4th Cir.2004).

Furthermore, we conclude that substantial evidence supports the immigration judge’s determination that Mema did not establish it was more likely than not that she would be tortured “by or at the instigation of or with the consent or acquiescence of a public official or other person acting in an official capacity.” 8 C.F.R. § 1208.18(a)(1) (2004). Therefore, she has not established her entitlement to relief under the CAT.

Finally, we find no error in the Board’s decision to affirm without opinion the immigration judge’s oral decision. *See Blanco de Belbruno v. Ashcroft,*362 F.3d 272 (4th Cir.2004). Accordingly, we deny Mema’s petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*PETITION DENIED*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This Schedule Contains Summary Financial Information Extracted From The
consolidated Condensed Financial Statements As Of March 31,2000 And For
The Three-months Then Ended And Is Qualified In Its Entirety By Reference
To Such Financial Statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           19594
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   155653
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    1275834
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1688467
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                         505297
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           137
<OTHER-SE>                                      596582
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1688467
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                477191
<CGS>                                           377583
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   432256
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               11734
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  33201
<INCOME-TAX>                                     12616
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              20585
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     19546
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.48
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.45


</TABLE>
227-/5"

ELECTRONIC RECORD

COA# 02-13-00526-CR OFFENSE: 22.021

Quentin Washington v. The State

STYLE: cjfTexas COUNTY: Denton

COA DISPOSITION: AFFIRM TRIAL COURT: 211th District Court

DATE: 02/05/2015 Publish: NO TC CASE #: F-2012-2475-C

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

Quentin Washington v. The State of

STYLE: Texas

PRO SB

CCA#: 2&7-/T

FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS:

date. 0t//7/jtoir

JUDGE: <0s[ LfaAsi^—*

Petition CCA Disposition:

DATE:

JUDGE:

SIGNED:

PUBLISH:

REHEARING IN CCA IS:

JUDGE:

PC:

DNP:

MOTION FOR

ELECTRONIC RECORD
110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 261 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Whereas the launching of the Great White Fleet marked the 

emergence of the United States as a true global 

seapower, able to dispatch 16 new battleships on a worldwide deployment for 14 months; 

Whereas these battleships were painted entirely white, with 

gilded scrollwork on their bows, and subsequently came 

to be known as the ‘‘Great White Fleet’’; 
2 

•HCON 261 EH 

Whereas the 4 squadrons of 4 battleships each, manned by 

14,000 sailors, sailed 43,000 miles and made 20 port 

calls on 6 continents; 

Whereas the Fleet, in conducting visits to important nations 

such as Australia, served to reinforce a friendship and 

partnership that continues to this day; 

Whereas the Fleet, in providing a tangible demonstration of 

the forward naval presence of the United States in the 

Pacific, also reinforced the message of how important 

maritime stability and security are to the United States; 

Whereas the Fleet, in response to one of the worst natural 

disasters in European history, was able to immediately 

divert to Messina, Sicily, to offer humanitarian aid to the 

Italian people; and 

Whereas the Fleet, in executing a range of missions and returning to the United States after 14 months at sea, displayed to the world a number of core American values, 

including compassion, showed its flexibility by responding 

to unforeseen events, and demonstrated the ability of the 

United States to project maritime power as a stabilizing 

force: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That the Congress— 

3 (1) commemorates the wisdom of President 

4 Theodore Roosevelt in developing and launching the 

5 Great White Fleet; 

6 (2) supports a one-time designation of a day to 

7 celebrate the 100th centennial of the Great White 

8 Fleet and the special role the Fleet played in build-
3 

•HCON 261 EH 

1 ing enduring friendships with important allies and 

2 partner nations; 

3 (3) commends efforts by the Department of the 

4 Navy to maintain and strengthen our cooperative 

5 partnerships with foreign nations and to safeguard 

6 our Nation’s interests in the maritime domain; 

7 (4) commends efforts by the Department of the 

8 Navy in leading the development of a Cooperative 

9 Strategy for 21st Century Seapower; and 

10 (5) honors the sacrifices made and services ren11 dered by the servicemembers of the Navy, Marine 

12 Corps, and the Coast Guard and the civilians who 

13 constitute our maritime services. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 11, 

2007. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 261 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Commemorating the centennial anniversary of the 

ginia, and returning there on February 22, 1909. December 16, 1907, from Hampton Roads, Virlaunched by President Theodore Roosevelt on sailing of the Navy’s ‘‘Great White Fleet,’’
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 80 (Thursday, April 26, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 20890]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-8031]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION


Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards; Revised Meeting Notice

    The agenda for the 542nd ACRS meeting, scheduled to be held on May 
3-5, 2007, has been revised as noted below. Notice of this meeting was 
previously published in the Federal Register on Wednesday, April 18, 
2007 (72 FR 19552).
    The discussion of the topic on the Commission Paper on Rulemaking 
to Make Risk-Informed Changes to Loss-of-Coolant Accident Technical 
Requirements; 10 CFR 50.46a, ``Acceptance Criteria for Emergency Core 
Cooling Systems for Light-Water Nuclear Power Reactors,'' scheduled to 
be held on Thursday, May 3, 2007 between 8:35 a.m. and 10:30 a.m., is 
postponed to a future meeting due to the unavailability of the 
Commission Paper. The discussion of the item on Digital Instrumentation 
and Control System Matters, scheduled to be held between 10:45 a.m. and 
12:15 p.m., is now scheduled between 8:35 a.m. and 10:30 a.m.
    The discussion of the item on ACRS members' Issues associated with 
the Technology-Neutral Framework for Future Plant Licensing, scheduled 
between 8:35 a.m. and 10:30 a.m. on Friday May 4, 2007, is now 
scheduled between 3 p.m.-5 p.m. on Thursday, May 3, 2007. The times for 
other items scheduled for Thursday, May 3 and Friday, May 4, 2007, 
previously published in the Federal Register, have been adjusted as 
noted in the revised agenda to facilitate effective use of the 
Committee's time. A revised agenda is posted on the NRC Web site at 
http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html or http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/ (ACRS & ACNW Mtg schedules/agendas).
    For further information, contact: Mr. Sam Duraiswamy, ACRS, 
(Telephone: 301-415-7364), between 7:30 a.m. and 4 p.m., ET.

    Dated: April 20, 2007.
Andrew L. Bates,
Advisory Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. E7-8031 Filed 4-25-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P