alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 193 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.Con.Res.193
                                              Agreed to October 16, 2007

                       One Hundred Tenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday,
            the fourth day of January, two thousand and seven

                          Concurrent Resolution

Whereas in 2006 there were over 16,000,000 hunters in the United States 
  of which only .0013 percent incurred an injury during the past 
  hunting season;

Whereas in 2006 this injury rate was lower than many other forms of 
  recreation;

Whereas there are 70,000 hunter education instructors teaching hunter 
  safety, ethics, and conservation to approximately 750,000 students 
  successfully each year;

Whereas State fish and game agencies began offering hunter safety 
  programs in 1949, and since then, more than 35,000,000 people have 
  been certified;

Whereas much of the success of hunter safety can be contributed to 
  hunter education training and the role of responsible hunters in the 
  field;

Whereas Congress commends Pennsylvania hunters for setting a new State 
  safety record in 2006;

Whereas hunters continue year after year to improve their safety 
  record; and

Whereas hunters are the vital link in preserving and maintaining the 
  great natural resources in the United States, including wild places: 
  Now, therefore, be it

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That the Congress--
        (1) recognizes all hunters across the United States for their 
    continued commitment to safety; and
        (2) directs the Secretary of the Senate to transmit a copy of 
    this resolution to the Pennsylvania State Game Commissioner and the 
    Director of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.
```
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 10.1

                                LOCK-UP AGREEMENT

         THIS AGREEMENT (the "Agreement"), entered into this 14th day of
December 1999, is by, between, and among Frederick R. Licht, Martin J. Burke,
III, and Jay Botchman, shareholders of Ultimate Sports Entertainment, Inc.
(the "Company").

                                    RECITALS:

         WHEREAS, each of the undersigned is currently a holder of shares of
the Company;

         WHEREAS, the Company is proposing to file a registration statement
for the offer and sale of shares of common stock of the Company to raise
operating capital for the Company;

         WHEREAS, to assist the Company in raising such funds, the
undersigned are willing to lock-up a percentage of their shares, subject to
the terms of this Agreement;

         NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual terms and conditions
of this Agreement, the parties hereto agree as follows:

         1. For a period of one year from the effective date of the proposed
registration statement to be filed by the Company with the Securities and
Exchange Commission to offer and sell shares of the Company's common stock,
each of the undersigned agrees that he will not sell, assign, pledge,
hypothecate or transfer eighty percent (80%) of any shares held or to be held
by him (whether such shares are owned by him directly or beneficially or in
the name or for the benefit of any member of his family) during such one year
period.

         2. This lock-up of shares shall also apply to the future issuance of
any shares to the undersigned during such one year period.

         3. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any of the undersigned may make a
transfer of any shares to one or more members of his immediate family,
provided that the transferee shall expressly agree to be bound by the
obligations of the undersigned pursuant to this Agreement.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Agreement the
day and year first above written.


                                       /s/ Frederick R. Licht

                                       /s/ Martin J. Burke, III

                                       /s/ Jay Botchman
Request for Public Comments on Exception al Events in the Greater Phoenix Area

In 2005, Congress identified a need to account fo r events that result in exceedances of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) that are exceptional in nature (e.g., not expected to reoccur or caused by acts of nature beyond man-made controls.) In response, EPA promulgated the Exceptional Events Rule (EER) to address exceptional events in 40 CFR Parts 50 and 51 on March 22, 2007 (72 FR 13560). On May 2, 2011, EPA released draft guidance documents on the implementation of the EER to Stat e, tribal and local air agencies for review. The EER allows for states and tribes to “flag” air quality monitoring data as an exceptional event. If flagged, these data can be excluded from consideration in air quality planning if EPA concurs with the demonstration submitted by the flagging agency documenting that all procedural and technical re quirements have been met.

Pursuant to 40 CFR 50.14(c)(3)(i) , the Arizona Department of E nvironmental Quality (ADEQ) is soliciting comments on its final demonstrations of events that have caused elevated

concentrations of PM 10 in the Greater Phoenix area on February 19; July 18; August 3; August 18; August 25 through 28; September 2; Octobe r 4; November 4, 2011; January 21 – 22 and February 27, 2012. ADEQ has decided to flag thes e episodes based on these analyses. Copies of the demonstrations are available for review beginning Monday, December 3, 2012, on the ADEQ

website at www.azdeq.gov/environ/air/plan/ . Interested parties can submit written comments throughout the comment period which will end at 5:00 p.m. on Tuesday, January 1, 2013. Any comments received will be responded to and forwar ded to EPA with the final demonstrations.

Written comments should be addressed, faxed, or e-mailed to: Andra Juniel, Air Assessment Section, Arizona Department of Environmental Quality, 1110 W. Washington Street, 3415-A, Phoenix, AZ 85007, PHONE: (602) 771-4417; FAX: (602) 771- 2366, E-mail: juniel.andra@azdeq.gov.

In addition to being available on-line, copies of the analyses are available for review, Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., at the ADEQ Records Center , 1110 W. Washington St., Phoenix, AZ, 85007, Attn: David Olivo, (602) 771-4380, email: olivo.david@azdeq.gov.

Persons with a disability may request reasonabl e accommodations by contacting Linda Morrison at (602) 771-4793 or 1-800-234-5677 ext. 771-4793. Th is document is available in alternative formats by contacting ADEQ TDD phone number at (602) 771-4829.
Before the Third Division,

December 5, 1949

No. 53776.

petition 6732-R (New York).

#### Haas Bros. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Cline, J.

From the record it appeared that the merchandise was invoiced and entered at 3 shillings 8 pence per pound and appraised as entered. Thereafter, a collector’s appeal was filed and, upon stipulation of counsel, the court found the dutiable export value to be 4 shillings per pound. At the trial a partner of the petitioner testified that he had the entry made through his broker; that on September 2, upon receiving information from said broker that the entered value might not be the correct dutiable value, he immediately wrote to the-shippers of the merchandise, apprising them that they had made an error; and that they replied, enclosing a copy of a letter written to the American consul on September 10, 1947. The letter, which is among the official papers, states in part: “On account of rapidly increasing costs of production, our selling prices for asbestos yarn have risen from 3/8d to 4/-d per lb.” In order to release the shipment, a corrected consular invoice — also among the official papers — -was enclosed for the signature of the American consul. The examiner testified that the above letter was received by him on October 7, 1947, after action on the entry had been completed. On the record presented it was held that the petitioner acted without intention to defraud the revenue of the United States or to conceal or misrepresent the facts of the case or to deceive the appraiser as to the value of the merchandise. The petition was therefore granted.
# C_2017078EN.01002401.xml

| 13.3.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 78/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.3.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 78/24

---

Judgment of the General Court of 2 February 2017 — IMG v Commission

(Case T-381/15) (1)

1

((Protection of the European Union’s financial interests - Strengthened audit and monitoring measures and verification warning in the early warning system (EWS) - Decision suspending the possibility for the applicant to conclude contracts for indirect management with the Commission having regard to doubts regarding its status as an international organisation - Action for annulment - Act not open to challenge - No interest in bringing proceedings - Partial inadmissibility - Rights of the defence - Obligation to state reasons - Manifest error of assessment - Proportionality - Legal certainty - Legitimate expectations - Application for damages))

(2017/C 078/32)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: International Management Group (IMG) (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: L. Levi and A.Tymen, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Baquero Cruz and S. Bartelt, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

First, application under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of the Commission’s letter in which that institution orders the strengthening of audit and monitoring measures and the issuing of a verification warning and refuses to allow the applicant to conclude contracts with the Commission for indirect management and, secondly, application under Article 268 TFEU seeking compensation in respect of the harm which the applicant allegedly suffered as a result of the adoption of the measures envisaged in that letter.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that there is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action in so far as International Management Group (IMG) seeks the annulment of the registration of a verification warning with regard to it in the early warning system; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that there is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action in so far as International Management Group (IMG) seeks the annulment of the registration of a verification warning with regard to it in the early warning system;

| 2. | Dismisses the action as inadmissible or unfounded as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the action as inadmissible or unfounded as to the remainder;

| 3. | Orders IMG to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders IMG to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 337, 12.10.2015.

1

---
(Reap. Dec. 9576)

#### Royal Sewing Machines Corp. *v.*United States

Entry No. 885524.

(Decided December 30, 1959)

Plaintiff not represented by counsel.

*George Oochran Douh,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Lawrence, Judge:

When this appeal for a reappraisement was called for hearing, there was no appearance on behalf of plaintiff.

An examination of the'official record discloses no reason for disturbing the presumptively correct value for the merchandise found by the appraiser.

I, therefore, find and hold the proper dutiable value of the merchandise covered by this appeal to be the value found by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   Exhibit 10.6

                FIRST AMENDMENT TO MANAGEMENT SERVICES AGREEMENT

         This First Amendment, dated January 28, 2000 (this "Amendment"), is
entered into by and between AmazeScape.com Inc., a Nevada corporation (the
"Company"), and Infusion Capital Partners, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability
company (the "Consultant").

         Company and Consultant are parties to a certain Management Services
Agreement dated October 12, 1999 (the "MSA") and are entering into this
Amendment to amend the MSA on the terms and conditions herein. Capitalized terms
used but not otherwise defined herein have the meanings given to such terms in
the MSA.

         In consideration of the mutual covenants of the parties set forth in
this Amendment and in the MSA, the parties, intending to be legally bound, agree
as follows:

         1. Section 4 of the MSA is hereby amended to delete the second and
third sentences thereof, such that the Warrant shall be exercisable with respect
to all 950,000 shares of the Company's common stock thereunder at an exercise
price of $1.00 per share without regard to the market price of the common stock.

         2. Concurrently with the execution of this Amendment, the warrants
dated October 12, 1999, issued by Company to Consultant (consisting of 3
warrants for the purchase, respectively, of 595,000 shares of Company common
stock, 177,500 shares of Company common stock and 177,500 shares of Company
common stock) shall be canceled and a new warrant for the purchase of 355,000,
as contemplated by this Amendment, shall be issued by Company in substitution
for such warrants. Such new warrant, together with the warrant dated October 12,
1999 for the purchase of 595,000 shares, shall constitute the Warrant.

         3. Sections 13 through 25 of the MSA are hereby incorporated into and
made a part of this Amendment as though written in full herein. This First
Amendment has been duly authorized by each of the parties. Except as expressly
provided herein, the terms and conditions of the MSA shall continue in full
force and effect and shall not be affected hereby.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the
date and year first written above.

                                       AMAZESCAPE.COM, INC.


                                       By: _________________________________
                                              Harrichand Persaud, CEO



                                       INFUSION CAPITAL PARTNERS, L.L.C.


                                       By: _________________________________
                                              David M. M. Taffet, President
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 206 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 206

    Honoring Kikkoman Foods, Inc. and its 50 years of commitment to 
            providing quality products to the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 7, 2007

   Mr. Daniel E. Lungren of California (for himself and Mr. Ryan of 
  Wisconsin) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
            referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
    Honoring Kikkoman Foods, Inc. and its 50 years of commitment to 
            providing quality products to the United States.

Whereas the people of the United States have great admiration for Kikkoman's 50 
        years of marketing and operations in the United States;
Whereas Kikkoman, one of the first Japanese companies to have a major 
        manufacturing plant in the United States, has made and continues to make 
        a steadfast commitment to the economic vitality and prosperity of the 
        United States with manufacturing facilities in California and Wisconsin;
Whereas Kikkoman, the United States' leading supplier of soy sauce, teriyaki 
        sauce, and other premium condiments, strongly contributes to the United 
        States' rich culinary tradition;
Whereas Kikkoman and its 1,000 employees have demonstrated a commitment to 
        promoting educational opportunities to collegiate students and have 
        donated over $500,000 to 9/11 and Tsunami victims through the Kikkoman 
        Foods Foundation, Inc.; and
Whereas Kikkoman has improved the quality of life in California and Wisconsin 
        through community development projects, which include the addition of 
        bike trails, expanding libraries, police and fire department facilities, 
        and improving the Folsom College Performing Arts program: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That Congress--
            (1) recognizes the importance of the contribution of 
        Kikkoman Food, Inc. to the economic vitality of the United 
        States; and
            (2) celebrates the 50 years of marketing and operations of 
        Kikkoman Food, Inc. in the United States.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 31

Certifications

I, Richard Simpson, certify that:

1.I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Trust 2016-GC37 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

2.Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4.Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and

5.All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:  Wells Fargo Bank, National Association; Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association; Park Bridge Lender Services LLC; Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas; CoreLogic Solutions, LLC; Berkadia Commercial Mortgage LLC; KeyBank National Association; Pentalpha Surveillance LLC; Greystone Servicing Company LLC; Computershare Trust Company, National Association; U.S. Bank National Association; and Wilmington Trust, National Association. 

Date:March 31, 2022

|  | /s/ Richard Simpson ___________________Richard SimpsonPresident, Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc.(senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor) |
|--|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

CGCMT 2016-GC37 Certifications
# C_2017283EN.01003501.xml

| 28.8.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 283/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.8.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 283/35

---

Judgment of the General Court of 12 July 2017 — Frinsa del Noroeste v EUIPO — Frigoríficos Unidos (Frinsa LA CONSERVERA)

(Case T-634/15) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative mark Frinsa LA CONSERVERA - Earlier EU figurative mark FRIUSA - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Similarity of the signs - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2017/C 283/52)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Frinsa del Noroeste, SA (Santa Eugenia de Ribeira, Spain) (represented by: J. Botella Reyna, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Schifko, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Frigoríficos Unidos, SA (Riudellots de la Selva, Spain)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 27 July 2015 (Case R 2382/2014-5) relating to opposition proceedings between Frigoríficos Unidos and Frinsa del Noroeste.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Frinsa del Noroeste, SA to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Frinsa del Noroeste, SA to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 16, 18.1.2016.

1

---
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-40105 Summary Calendar

ROBERT LAWRENCE MORGAN, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus DAVID HARO, CO III, Michael Unit; UNIDENTIFIED STEWART, CO III, Michael Unit; UNIDENTIFIED BAKER, Sergeant, Michael Unit, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas

- - - - - - - - - - March 31, 1997 Before DAVIS EMILIO M. GARZA and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: The magistrate judge declined to rule on a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal filed by Texas prisoner Robert Lawrence Morgan, #452774. In accordance with the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA): (1) If a prisoner brings a civil action or files an appeal in forma pauperis, the prisoner shall be required to pay the full amount of a filing fee. The court shall assess and, when funds exist, collect, as a partial payment of any court fees required by law, an initial partial filing fee of 20 percent of the greater of -- (A) the average monthly deposits to the prisoner’s account; orNo. 97-40105 - 2 - (B) the average monthly balance in the prisoner’s account for the 6-month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint or notice of appeal. (2) After payment of the initial partial filing fee, the prisoner shall be required to make monthly payments of 20 percent of the preceding month’s income credited to the prisoner’s account. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b). A prisoner who seeks to proceed IFP on appeal must obtain leave to so proceed despite proceeding IFP in the district court. Jackson v. Stinnett , 102 F.3d 132, 136 (5th Cir. 1996). We hold that the financial screening and assessment procedures of the PLRA regarding appellate filing fees are to be conducted by the district courts. When a district court grants a prisoner leave to proceed IFP on appeal, the district court must assess the initial partial filing fee and order payment of the remainder of the filing fee as directed by the PLRA. Accordingly, the case is REMANDED to the district court so that the district court may rule on the IFP motion and, if granted, order the payment of the appellate filing fee pursuant to § 1915(b). After this determination is made, the district court shall return the case to this court for further proceedings.
REMANDED.