alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-1885
ANITA RHINEHART, Widow of Will Rhinehart, Petitioner, versusDIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board. (96-311-BLA) Submitted: January 7, 1997 Decided: January 24, 1997 Before WIDENER, ERVIN, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Anita Rhinehart, Petitioner Pro Se. Patricia May Nece, Rodger Pitcairn, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks review of the Benefits Review Board's decision and order affirming the administrative law judge's denial of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C.A. §§ 901-945 (West 1986 & Supp. 1996). Our review of the record discloses that the Board's decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. Rhinehart v. Director, OWCP , No. 96-311-BLA (B.R.B. May 30, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
No. 47587.

#### Protests 50663-K, etc., of G. Hirsch Sons, Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain of the items consist of woven fabrics wholly or in chief value of one or more of the materials provided for in paragraph 385 and are similar in all material respects to merchandise involved in *Meyer*v. *United States*(6 Cust. Ct. 191, C. D. 459) the claim at 40 percent under paragraph 385 and T. D. 48316 was sustained as to those items.
Exhibit 32




Certification Pursuant to Section 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsection (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Canal Capital Corporation and Subsidiaries, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify that:
 
 The Quarterly Report of Form 10-Q for the three months ended April 30, 2011 (the “Form 10-Q”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 Date: June 7, 2011
/S/ Michael E. SchultzChief Executive OfficerDate: June 7, 2011
/S/ Reginald SchauderChief Financial Officer
No. 48720.

#### Protests 93161-K, etc., of A. Bianco & Son, Inc., et al. (New York).

*252Opinion by

Keefe, J.

It was stipulated that certain of the cheese assessed at 7 cents per pound or at 35 percent ad valorem under paragraph 710, Tariff Act of 1930, consists of cheese similar to that involved in *Scaramelli*v. *United States*(9 Cust. Ct. 270, C. D. 706), wherein the court stated that certain string or twine had been removed from the cheese in question and was not in issue. In accordance with that decision and Abstracts 40880 and 41794, wherein it was found that the string surrounding Provolone cheese was deductible as tare as a part of the inedible coverings, it was held that the cheese in question was properly dutiable on the basis of the net weight of the cheese as returned by the' United States weigher, not including the weight of the string, less 2)4 percent for inedible coverings. The protests were sustained to this extent.
Johnson, Dastina - Boise, ID

Subject: 'eNewsbytes' - Partnering to Protect Fish and Enhance Farming on the Bear River

Page 1 of 1

3/1/2007

 

Partnering to Protect Fish and Enhance Farming on the Bear River

 The Bear River in southeastern Idaho provides critical habitat for the threatened 

Bonneville cutthroat trout. This river and its tributaries also provide major sources of 

irrigation water for farms and ranches along the riverbanks.

According to District Conservationist, Larry Mickelsen, after irrigation season, there 

were numerous fish found trapped in the irrigation ditches. With guidance from the Bear

Lake Soil and Water Conservation District, Trout Unlimited, the Ovid Irrigation Company 

and landowner Dennis Carlsen contacted NRCS to cost share a better fish passage and 

improved irrigation system. 

The NRCS Wildlife Habitat Incentives Program provided 75 

percent of the $45,000 project. Today, a large irrigation 

diversion structure and screen exist on Bear River’s 

tributary, Ovid Creek. It is expected to prevent the fish from

being trapped and killed when traveling up and down the 

spawning tributary.

Designed by NRCS Civil Engineer, Dale Gooby, the fish 

screen has no moving parts and requires no power- some 

say it is virtually maintenance free. A bypass pipe is used to transport fish back to the 

stream, while screened water is discharged into the canal.

Mickelsen enjoys the partnership and expects to have joint projects for years to come. 

For more informtion about this project, contact Larry Mickelsen, 208/847-0585. 

 

All eNewsbytes are archived online at http://www.id.nrcs.usda.gov/news/ebytes.html for

viewing anytime.
pol 

ProcessID stateID countyID yearID

source 

TypeID

fuel 

TypeID

IM 

ProgramID

inspect 

Freq

test 

StandardsID

begModel 

YearID

endModel 

YearID

use 

IMyn

compliance 

Factor

101 47 47157 2013 21 1 1 1 11 1974 1995 N 83.16

101 47 47157 2013 21 1 10 1 51 1996 2011 N 83.16

101 47 47157 2013 31 1 1 1 11 1974 1995 N 83.16

101 47 47157 2013 31 1 10 1 51 1996 2011 N 83.16

101 47 47157 2013 32 1 1 1 11 1974 1995 N 83.16

101 47 47157 2013 32 1 10 1 51 1996 2011 N 83.16

101 47 47157 2013 52 1 1 1 11 1974 1995 N 83.16

101 47 47157 2013 52 1 10 1 51 1996 2011 N 83.16

102 47 47157 2013 21 1 1 1 11 1974 1995 N 83.16

102 47 47157 2013 21 1 10 1 51 1996 2011 N 83.16

102 47 47157 2013 31 1 1 1 11 1974 1995 N 83.16

102 47 47157 2013 31 1 10 1 51 1996 2011 N 83.16

102 47 47157 2013 32 1 1 1 11 1974 1995 N 83.16

102 47 47157 2013 32 1 10 1 51 1996 2011 N 83.16

102 47 47157 2013 52 1 1 1 11 1974 1995 N 83.16

102 47 47157 2013 52 1 10 1 51 1996 2011 N 83.16

112 47 47157 2013 21 1 8 1 43 1996 2006 N 83.16

112 47 47157 2013 31 1 8 1 43 1996 2006 N 83.16

112 47 47157 2013 32 1 8 1 43 1996 2006 N 83.16

112 47 47157 2013 52 1 7 1 41 1996 2006 N 83.16

112 47 47157 2013 52 1 8 1 43 2007 2011 N 83.16

113 47 47157 2013 21 1 8 1 43 1996 2006 N 83.16

113 47 47157 2013 31 1 8 1 43 1996 2006 N 83.16

113 47 47157 2013 32 1 8 1 43 1996 2006 N 83.16

113 47 47157 2013 52 1 7 1 41 1996 2006 N 83.16

113 47 47157 2013 52 1 8 1 43 2007 2011 N 83.16

301 47 47157 2013 21 1 10 1 51 1996 2011 N 83.16

301 47 47157 2013 31 1 10 1 51 1996 2011 N 83.16

301 47 47157 2013 32 1 10 1 51 1996 2011 N 83.16

301 47 47157 2013 52 1 10 1 51 1996 2011 N 83.16

302 47 47157 2013 21 1 10 1 51 1996 2011 N 83.16

302 47 47157 2013 31 1 10 1 51 1996 2011 N 83.16

302 47 47157 2013 32 1 10 1 51 1996 2011 N 83.16

302 47 47157 2013 52 1 10 1 51 1996 2011 N 83.16
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Gordon R. Arnold, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the quarterly report of Sierra Monitor Corporation on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such quarterly report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Sierra Monitor Corporation.



Date:

November 7, 2006

By:

/s/ Gordon R. Arnold

Gordon R. Arnold

Chief Executive Officer

Chief Financial Officer







Page 21 of 21
#### Preble *versus*Hay.

After fhe expiration of a *written*lease, no notice to the tenant is necessary for the purpose of terminating the tenancy.

In a tenancy *at will, it seems*that a written notice to the tenant to remove the buildings which he had erected, and to surrender the land to the landlord, will have the effect of a notice to terminate the tenancy.

Exceptions, from the District Court, Cole, J.

Complaint for forcible entry and detainer. General issue. There was evidence tending to prove, *that,*in November, 1843, the plaintiff leased the land to one Oxnard by a written lease for five years ; and *that*the tenant was assignee of that lease, and under it had occupied the land for thee or four years, paying the rents to the plaintiff quarter yearly.

*457It was proved that, in Dec. 1848, the following notice addressed to the defendant and signed by the plaintiff, was served on the defendant; viz. — “ Portland, Dec. 27, 1848. You are hereby notified to remove the building now on my land, on the south-west side of Preble street, without any delay, and deliver up to me the possession of the premises j” and that, in May, 1849, another notice of the same import was served upon him. This complaint was instituted in July, 1849.

The jury were instructed, 1st, that if the defendant was assignee of the written lease, and held under it, and if the lease had expired prior to the notice of Dec. 1848, the action was maintained ; and 2d, that if the tenancy was merely at will, the notice of Dec. 1848, was sufficient to terminate it. The verdict was for the plaintiff, and the jury found specially, that the defendant held under the Oxnard lease, and was the assignee of Oxnard.

Sweat, for the defendant.

The second instruction was erroneous. The notice of Dec. 1848, is not susceptible of the construction given to it. It was not designed to put an end to the tenancy, nor could it, in law, have that effect.

*W. P.*Fessenden, for the plaintiff.

Wells, J.,

orally.—The second instruction was correct. The notice of December, 1848, was a notice to remove the building and surrender the possession of the land to the plaintiff, and it was sufficient to terminate the tenancy. But that is an immaterial point. The jury have found, that the holding was under a written lease, which had expired when the first notice was given. In such a case no notice of the termination of the tenancy is necessary. The first instruction Was also correct.

*Exceptions overruled.*
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 209 

Expressing the sense of Congress that the Museum of the American Quilter’s 

Society, located in Paducah, Kentucky, should be designated as the 

‘‘National Quilt Museum of the United States’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 14, 2007 

Mr. WHITFIELD submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of Congress that the Museum of the 

American Quilter’s Society, located in Paducah, Kentucky, should be designated as the ‘‘National Quilt Museum of the United States’’. 

Whereas the Museum of the American Quilter’s Society is the 

largest quilt museum in the world, with a total of 13,400 

square feet of exhibition space and more than 150 quilts 

exhibited year-round in its 3 galleries; 

Whereas the mission of the Museum is to educate the local, 

national, and international public about the art, history, 

and heritage of quiltmaking; 

Whereas quilts in the Museum’s permanent collection are 

made by quilters from 44 of the 50 States and many foreign countries; 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•HCON 209 IH 

Whereas the Museum, centrally located in Paducah, Kentucky, and open to the public year-round, averages 

40,000 visitors per year; 

Whereas individuals from all 50 States and from more than 

25 foreign countries have visited the Museum; 

Whereas the Museum’s Friends, an organization dedicated to 

supporting and sustaining the Museum, also has members in all 50 States, with 84 percent of members living 

more than 60 miles from the Museum; 

Whereas many members of the Museum’s Friends have supported the Museum annually since the Museum began in 

1991; 

Whereas quilts exhibited in the Museum are representative of 

the Nation and its cultures thanks to the wide diversity 

of themes and topics, quilts, and quiltmakers; and 

Whereas the Museum of the American Quilter’s Society has 

national significance and support: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that the Mu3 seum of the American Quilter’s Society, located at 215 

4 Jefferson Street, Paducah, Kentucky, should be des5 ignated as the ‘‘National Quilt Museum of the United 

6 States’’. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
No. 46942.

#### Protests 30585-K, etc., of Strauss Bros. & Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of Abstract 43372 the claim at 40 percent under paragraph 339 was sustained.
|WELLS
    FARGO(logo) | Commercial
    Mortgage ServicingD1050-084, 8th Fl
401 South Tryon Street
Charlotte, NC 28202
1-800-326-1334
|--------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE



Reference is hereby made to that
certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of April 1, 2016, by and among CITIGROUP COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES INC, as
Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, C-III ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC, as Special Servicer, PARK BRIDGE
LENDER SERVICES LLC, as Operating Advisor and Asset Representations Reviewer, CITIBANK, N.A., as Certificate Administrator and
WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2016-P3
(the “Agreement”). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.



Pursuant to Section 10.08 of this Agreement, I, Daniel
Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities of the Master Servicer
during the period from January 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance per
the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review,
the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting
Period.                                                       



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this
Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2018.



|/s/ Daniel Bober         | 
|------------------------ | 
|Daniel Bober             | 
|Executive Vice President | 
|Wells Fargo Bank         | 



Together we’ll
go far

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
### The ground-water resources of Columbia County, Arkansas, a reconnaissance

By: David B. TaitR. C. BakerG. A. Billingsley

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/cir241

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
No. 49403.

#### Protests 102933-K, etc., of Cambridge Instruments Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

At the hearing the examiner testified that the compressometers and the extensometer are similar to those involved in *United States*v. *American Machine & Metals Inc.*(29 C. C. P. A. 137, C. A. D. 183), the record in which was incorporated herein. He also stated that the marking-off tools are properly dutiable under paragraph 397. In accordance therewith and following C. A. D. 183, the protests were' sustained as to the compressometers and extensometer, and the. marking-off tools were held dutiable at 45 percent under paragraph 397, as claimed.
Exhibit 10.1
 Original:
    
    TMJcc:
    
    TAA;
    
    CATKDM;
    
    TJOCJN;
    
    PJSILP;
 
       Section 1. Service to be Rendered
 Section 2. Term




---



##### 



Primary Receipt Points
 FootnoMeasuring
    
    t
    
    
    Measuring
    
    Maximum DailyPoint No.
    
    e
    
    
    Point Name
    
    Quantity (Dth/Day)2700010
    
    
    
    
    
    CGT - RAYNE
    
    
    51,598




---



##### 



Primary
Delivery  Points
 FootnoMeasuring
    
    t
    
    
    Measuring
    
    Maximum DailyPoint No.
    
    e
    
    
    Point Name
    
    Quantity (Dth/Day)801
    
    
    
    
    
    TCO - LEACH
    
    
    51,598




---



##### 



CANCELLATION OF PREVIOUS APPENDIX A
  UGI UTILITIES, INC.By:
    
    /s/ Robert J. ChaneyName:
    
    Robert J. ChaneyTitle:
    
    Vice President & General ManagerDate: 2/3/97COLUMBIA GULF TRANSMISSION COMPANYBy:
    
    /s/ Barry J. LoweryName:
    
    Barry J. LoweryTitle:
    
    Manager, Agreements AdministrationDate: October 2, 1996




---



##### 



Section 3. Rates
 Section 4. Notices P. O.
Box 12677,
 Section 5. Superseded Agreements
 Section 6. Other Obligations
 UGI UTILITIES, INC.By:
    
    /s/ Robert J. ChaneyName:
    
    Robert J. ChaneyTitle:
    
    Vice President & General ManagerDate: 2/3/97COLUMBIA GULF TRANSMISSION COMPANYBy:
    
    /s/ Barry J. LoweryName:
    
    Barry J. LoweryTitle:
    
    Manager, Agreements AdministrationDate: October 2, 1996
Low Wind Speed Technology Phase II: Integrated Wind Energy/Desalination System

General Electric Global Research

Project Description: The scarcity of fresh water is a growing global problem. According to the United Nations, the worldwide need 

for water in 2025 is expected to be billions of cubic meters per day. Desalination of abundant ocean salt water is an important 

solution, but its capacity is currently estimated at only 28 million cubic meters per day (m3

/d). Because desalination is an energyintensive process, energy cost has been the greatest barrier to its development. Among all the desalination process technologies, 

reverse osmosis has demonstrated the highest electrical energy efficiency (3–8 kWh/m3

 water). Even so, energy cost accounts for 

about 40% of total desalinated water cost by reverse osmosis. From both an energy cost and an environmental point of view, 

inexpensive and clean alternative power sources are needed to provide a low-cost desalination solution. Wind power is the least 

expensive renewable power source, so it is a desirable option for integration with desalination technologies.

The variable nature of wind presents the principal challenge for wind hybrid systems. Because water is simple and inexpensive 

to store, a transient process needs to be developed that can absorb the full variability in input energy. This project explores winddesalination concepts, identifies technical issues, explores the feasibility of alternative concepts, and evaluates their economic 

viability.

Project Type:	 Conceptual Design Study

Total Project Budget: 	 $199,823

Industry Cost Share: 	 $0

DOE Cost Share: 	 $199,823

Planned Project Duration:	October 2004–July 2005

Contacts:

NREL/Sandia: GE Global Research:

Scott Schreck, NREL	 Fernando D’Amato, GE Global Research

1617 Cole Blvd.	 One Research Circle

Golden, Colorado 80401	 Niskayuna, New York 12309

303-384-7102	 518-387-7311

scott_schreck@nrel.gov	 damato@crd.ge.com

Current Status: 	 Project Complete

Wind Turbine

Reverse Osmosis Desalination

Desalted Water

A Strong Portfolio for a Strong America • Energy efficiency and clean, renewable energy will mean a stronger economy, a cleaner environment, and greater energy 

independence for America. Working with a wide array of state, community, industry, and university partners, the U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Energy Efficiency 

and Renewable Energy invests in a diverse portfolio of energy technologies.

For more information contact EERE Information Center • 1-877-EERE-INF (1-877-337-3463) • www.eere.energy.gov

Produced for the U.S. Department of Energy by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, a DOE national laboratory

Printed with a renewable-source ink on paper containing at least 50% wastepaper, including 10% post consumer waste.

DOE/GO-102006-2197

March 2006