alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2015381EN.01004401.xml

| 16.11.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 381/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.11.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 381/44

---

Order of the President of the General Court of 21 September 2015 — Eden Green Vivai Piante di Verdesca Giuseppe and Others v Commission

(Case T-437/15 R)

((Interim measures - Agriculture - Protective measures against pests of plants - Measures to prevent the introduction into and the spread within the European Union of Xylella fastidiosa - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - Failure to comply with the procedural requirements - Inadmissibility))

(2015/C 381/53)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Eden Green Vivai Piante di Verdesca Giuseppe and Others (Copertino, Italy) and the other 37 applicants whose names are set out in the annex to the order (represented by: G. Manelli, lawyer)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: D. Bianchi and I. Galindo Martín, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application to suspend the operation of Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/789 of 18 May 2015 as regards measures to prevent the introduction into and the spread within the Union of Xylella fastidiosa (Wells et al.) (OJ 2015 L 125, p. 36).

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim measures is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim measures is dismissed.

| 2. | Costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Costs are reserved.

---
AMENDMENT NO. 1 OF RIGHTS AGREEMENT

     THIS AMENDMENT (this "Amendment") of the Rights Agreement
(as defined below) is made and entered into as of the 28TH day of
September, 1998, by and between VARLEN CORPORATION, a Delaware
corporation (the "Company"), and HARRIS TRUST AND SAVINGS BANK
(the "Rights Agent").

                            RECITALS:

     WHEREAS the parties hereto previously entered into a Rights
Agreement, dated as of June 17, 1996, between the Company and the
Rights Agent; and

     WHEREAS each of the Company and the Rights Agent desire to
amend the Rights Agreement as set forth below.

     NOW, THEREFORE, the undersigned, in consideration of the
premises, covenants and agreements contained herein and in the
Rights Agreement, and other good, sufficient and valuable
consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby
acknowledged, do hereby agree as follows:

     1.   Amendment.  The first sentence of Section 7(b) of the
Rights Agreement is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to read
as follows:

          "The Purchase Price shall be $90 for each one one-thousandth
          of share of Preferred Stock purchasable upon exercise of a Right."
          
     2.   Binding Effect.  This Amendment shall be binding upon,
and shall inure to the benefit of, the parties hereto and their
respective successors and assigns.

     3.   Execution in Counterparts.  This Amendment may be
executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but
all of which shall constitute one and the same instrument.

     4.   Rights Agreement in Effect.  Except as hereby amended, the
Rights Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.

     5.   Governing Law.  This Amendment shall be governed by,
and interpreted in accordance with, the laws of the State of
Delaware, without regard to principles of conflict of laws.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have caused this
Amendment to be duly executed as of the day and year first-above
written.

                              VARLEN CORPORATION
                              By:  /s/Richard L. Wellek
                              Richard L. Wellek
                              Chairman and CEO

 HARRIS TRUST AND SAVINGS BANK
 By:  /s/Simone A. Harris
 Simone A. Harris
 Trust Officer
# C_2015346EN.01003802.xml

| 19.10.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 346/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.10.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 346/38

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 7 September 2015 — Verhelst v EMA

(Case F-9/15) (1)

1

(2015/C 346/43)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 118, 13.4.2015, p. 46.

1

---
# C_2015221EN.01002002.xml

| 6.7.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 221/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.7.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 221/20

---

Order of the President of the General Court of 20 May 2015 — Hamcho and Hamcho International v Council

(Case T-153/15 R)

((Application for interim measures - Restrictive measures taken against Syria - Freezing of funds and restriction on entry into and transit through the territory of the European Union - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - Failure to comply with the procedural requirements - Inadmissibility))

(2015/C 221/28)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Mohamad Hamcho (Damascus, Syria); and Hamcho International (Damascus) (represented by: A. Boesch, D. Amaudruz and M. Ponsard, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for suspension of operation of the measures imposed on the applicants under Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/108 of 26 January 2015 implementing Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria (OJ 2015 L 20, p. 2), and of Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2015/117 of 26 January 2015 implementing Decision 2013/255/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Syria (OJ 2015 L 20, p. 85).

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim measures is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim measures is dismissed.

| 2. | Costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Costs are reserved.

---
# C_2015320EN.01005501.xml

| 28.9.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 320/55 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.9.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 320/55

---

Action brought on August 3rd 2015 — ZZ v Commission

(Case F-112/15)

(2015/C 320/76)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: R. Rata, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision of the Commission not to include the applicant on the list of promoted officials under the promotion exercise of 2014.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of 14 November 2014 of the Appointing Authority of the European Commission, issued by means of the Administrative Notice No 41-2014, establishing the list of promoted officials under the promotion exercise of 2014 in so far as the name of the Applicant is not included therein; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of 14 November 2014 of the Appointing Authority of the European Commission, issued by means of the Administrative Notice No 41-2014, establishing the list of promoted officials under the promotion exercise of 2014 in so far as the name of the Applicant is not included therein;

| — | order the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the Applicant. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the Applicant.

---
#### ANOTO AB, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Oral F. SEKENDUR, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-1115.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

July 5, 2005.

Oral F. Sekendur, pro se.

Before NEWMAN, CLEVENGER, and RADER, Circuit Judges.

RADER, Circuit Judge.

*ORDER*

Anoto AB moves to dismiss Oral F. Sekendur’s appeal as moot. Sekendur opposes. Anoto replies. Sekendur moves for leave to file a surreply, with surreply attached.

Anoto sued Sekendur in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, case no. 03-CV-4723, seeking, inter alia, a declaratory judgment of noninfringement and invalidity of the patent that Sekendur then owned. Sekendur counterclaimed. The district court granted summary judgment of nonin*317Mngement and invalidity and entered a judgment, pursuant Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b), on count III of Anoto’s complaint and on Sekendur’s counterclaim. Sekendur appealed to this court, appeal no. 05-1115.

Meanwhile, Sekendur assigned various patent assets, including the patent at issue in this case and the right to collect past damages from accused infringers, to another party. Anoto now moves to dismiss Sekendur’s appeal on the ground that because Sekendur has no legal interest in the patent, Sekendur’s appeal is moot.

We agree that there is no longer a case or controversy concerning the appeal. Sekendur has not shown any legal interest in the patent. “A case is moot when the issues presented are no longer ‘live’ or the parties lack a legally cognizable interest in the outcome.” *NEC Corp. v. United States,*151 F.3d 1361, 1369 (Fed.Cir.1998) (quoting *Powell v. McCormack,*395 U.S. 486, 496, 89 S.Ct. 1944, 23 L.Ed.2d 491 (1969)).

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The motion to dismiss is granted.

(2) Sekendur’s motion for leave to file a surreply is granted.

(3) Each side shall bear its own costs.
No. 43070.

#### Protest 990966-G of M. Knoedler & Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

No evidence was offered to prove that the exporter was in fact the importer thereof. Therefore the protest was overruled.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 4.2

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


     [GRAPHIC]                                                   [GRAPHIC]

                              HOOPER HOLMES, INC.
    COMMON STOCK                                                COMMON STOCK
             INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

                                                               CUSIP 439104 10 0

THIS CERTIFIES THAT




is the owner of

         FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE SHARES OF THE PAR VALUE OF FOUR CENTS
($0.04) EACH OF THE COMMON STOCK OF HOOPER HOMES, INC. transferable on the books
of the Corporation in person or by duly authorized Attorney on surrender of the
Certificate properly endorsed. This Certificate is not valid unless
countersigned and registered by the Transfer Agent and Registrar.
                   IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this
Certificate to be signed by its duly authorized officers and its Corporate Seal
to be hereto affixed.

      [SEAL]  Dated


                   [SIGNATURE]                    [SIGNATURE]

                              Secretary                      President

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Exhibit 32.2

                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the
undersigned, as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of VSE
Corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify that to the best of the
undersigned's knowledge:


	1) the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
June 30, 2009 (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

	2) the information contained in the Company's Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.


Dated: July 30, 2009                     /s/ T. R. Loftus
                                         ____________________________________
                                         T. R. Loftus
                                         Executive Vice President and
                                         Chief Financial Officer
                                         (Principal Accounting Officer)
Exhibit 31.3

Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to

Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a)

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Frederick A. Henderson, certify that:

1. I have reviewed
this Amendment to the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Adient plc for the year ended September 30, 2017;

2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact

necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading

with respect to the period covered by this report;
and

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all

material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.



By:

/s/ Frederick A. HendersonFrederick A. HendersonInterim Chief Executive OfficerDate:

June 29, 2018
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United
States Code), each of the undersigned officers of United Refining Company, a Pennsylvania corporation (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended November 30, 2008 (the Form 10-Q) of the Company fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                        |  |     |  |                            
|----------------------- |  | --- |  | ---------------------------
|Dated: January 20, 2009 |  | By: |  | /s/ John A. Catsimatidis   
|                        |  |     |  | John A. Catsimatidis       
|                        |  |     |  | Principal Executive Officer



|                        |  |     |  |                            
|----------------------- |  | --- |  | ---------------------------
|Dated: January 20, 2009 |  | By: |  | /s/ James E. Murphy        
|                        |  |     |  | James E. Murphy            
|                        |  |     |  | Principal Financial Officer
# C_2016410EN.01003304.xml

| 7.11.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 410/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.11.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 410/33

---

Order of the General Court of 14 September 2015 — Othman v Council

(Case T-464/15) (1)

1

(2016/C 410/50)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 337, 12.10.2015.

1

---
#### Williams *versus*Robbins.

The Act of this State, passed August 3, 1848, provides, that no action against a bankrupt, for a debt due prior to his bankruptcy, should be “ brought and maintained upon any new promise, unless the same be in writing.”

In such an action the defence of bankruptcy is defeated by an unconditional promise to pay, made *prior*to that Act.

Assumpsit, submitted on agreed facts. The defendant, prior to December, 1842, owed the plaintiff fifty dollars on *182.account. On March 21, 1843, he was decreed a bankrupt on his own petition, dated Dec. 16, 1842, and obtained a final discharge Aug. 27, 1844. In 1845, the plaintiff’s agent presented him the bill for payment. He said the bill was right, that he could not pay it then, but would pay $10, the next day, and the residue when convenient; that he was not legally bound to pay it, but it was an honorary debt, that it was like cash in hand, and he would pay it.

Rowe, for plaintiff.

*Kelley*and *McCrillis,*for defendant.

Shepley, C. J.,

orally.—The conversation relied on by the plaintiff was prior to the Act, invalidating new promises in bankruptcy cases, except those made in writing. Was there a binding promise. The first part of the conversation was with some limitations. Parties in making verbal contracts often open with propositions which, on further consideration, they consent to enlarge. At the conclusion, the defendant said the debt was an honorary one, and he would pay it. We think it was not his meaning to connect this promise with the preceding limitations, and that it was a promise unconditional. *Judgment for plaintiff.*
# C_2016454EN.01003301.xml

| 5.12.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 454/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.12.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 454/33

---

Order of the General Court of 19 September 2016 — European Dynamics Luxembourg and Others v Frontex

(Case T-613/15) (1)

(2016/C 454/56)

Language of the case: Greek

The President of the Fourth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 7, 11.1.2016.

---
```

[110th Congress Public Law 194]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ194.110]

[[Page 122 STAT. 651]]

Public Law 110-194
110th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
   59 Colby Corner in East Hampstead, New Hampshire, as the ``Captain 
   Jonathan D. Grassbaugh Post Office''. <<NOTE: Mar. 11, 2008 -  [S. 
                                2478]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. CAPTAIN JONATHAN D. GRASSBAUGH POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 59 Colby Corner in East Hampstead, New Hampshire, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Captain Jonathan D. Grassbaugh Post 
Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Captain 
Jonathan D. Grassbaugh Post Office''.

    Approved March 11, 2008.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--S. 2478:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD:
                                                        Vol. 153 (2007):
                                    Dec. 19, considered and passed 
                                        Senate.
                                                        Vol. 154 (2008):
                                    Feb. 28, considered and passed 
                                        House.

                                  <all>
```
# C_2016326EN.01001903.xml

| 5.9.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.9.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/19

---

Order of the President of the Seventh Chamber of the Court of 1 June 2016 — The National Iranian Gas Company v Council of the European Union

(Case C-359/15 P) (1)

1

(2016/C 326/33)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 294, 7.9.2015.

1

---
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 86 (Friday, May 4, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 25304]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-8532]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Notice of Proposals to Engage in Permissible Nonbanking 
Activities or to Acquire Companies that are Engaged in Permissible 
Nonbanking Activities

    The companies listed in this notice have given notice under section 
4 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843) (BHC Act) and 
Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225) to engage de novo, or to acquire or 
control voting securities or assets of a company, including the 
companies listed below, that engages either directly or through a 
subsidiary or other company, in a nonbanking activity that is listed in 
Sec.  225.28 of Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.28) or that the Board has 
determined by Order to be closely related to banking and permissible 
for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise noted, these activities 
will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Each notice is available for inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank 
indicated. The notice also will be available for inspection at the 
offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their 
views in writing on the question whether the proposal complies with the 
standards of section 4 of the BHC Act. Additional information on all 
bank holding companies may be obtained from the National Information 
Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding the applications must be 
received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of 
Governors not later than May 31, 2007.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (David Tatum, Vice President) 
1000 Peachtree Street, N.E., Atlanta, Georgia 30309:
    1. CapitalSouth Bancorp, Birmingham, Alabama; to acquire 100 
percent of the voting shares of Monticello Bancshares, Inc., and 
thereby indirectly acquire Monticello Bank, both of Jacksonville, 
Florida, and engage in operating a savings association, pursuant to 
section 225.28(b)(4)(ii) of Regulation Y.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, May 1, 2007.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc.E7-8532 Filed 5-3-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
# C_2016419EN.01004302.xml

| 14.11.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 419/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.11.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 419/43

---

Judgment of the General Court of 28 September 2016 — Kozmetika Afrodita v EUIPO — Núñez Martín and Machado Montesinos (AFRODITA COSMETICS)

(Case T-575/15) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative mark AFRODITA COSMETICS - Earlier national word mark EXOTIC AFRODITA MYSTIC MUSK OIL and earlier national figurative mark AFRODITA MYSTIC MUSK OIL - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2016/C 419/57)

Language of the case: Slovenian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Kozmetika Afrodita d.o.o. (Rogaška Slatina, Slovenia) (represented by: B. Grešak, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Rajh, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Pedro Núñez Martín (Madrid, Spain) and Carmen Guillermina Machado Montesinos (Madrid)

Other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 28 July 2015 (case R 2578/2014-4) relating to opposition proceedings between, on the one hand, Mr Núñez Martín and Ms Machado Montesinos and, on the other, Kozmetika Afrodita.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Kozmetika Afrodita d.o.o. to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Kozmetika Afrodita d.o.o. to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 406, 7.12.2015.

1

---
Before the Third Division,

September 4, 1940

No. 44246.

#### Protest 782100-G of Gellman Bros. (St. Paul).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise in question is similar to that the subject of *Woolworth*v. *United States*(T. D. 47647). It was therefore held free of duty under paragraph 1703 as claimed.