alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   Exhibit 12.01

                  UNITED CITIES GAS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

        COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF CONSOLIDATED EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

                         FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDED


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(Unaudited, in thousands, except ratio amounts)
                                                       9-30-96    12-31-95   12-31-94   12-31-93   12-31-92   12-31-91
                                                       -------    --------   --------   --------   --------   --------
<S>                                                    <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>
Fixed Charges, as defined:
   Interest on long-term debt........................  $14,530    $13,697    $14,026    $14,553    $12,965    $11,111
   Amortization of debt discount.....................      283        227        227        220        181        233
                                                       -------    -------    -------    -------    -------    -------
      Total..........................................  $14,813    $13,924    $14,253    $14,773    $13,146    $11,344
                                                       =======    =======    =======    =======    =======    =======
Earnings, as defined:
   Net income........................................  $15,425     $9,935    $12,093    $12,150    $10,218     $7,875
   Taxes on income...................................    9,795      6,970      6,503      5,681      5,171      2,564
   Fixed charges, as above...........................   14,813     13,924     14,253     14,773     13,146     11,344
                                                       -------    -------    -------    -------    -------    -------
      Total..........................................  $40,033    $30,829    $32,849    $32,604    $28,535    $21,783
                                                       =======    =======    =======    =======    =======    =======

Ratio of Consolidated Earnings to Fixed Charges......     2.70       2.21       2.30       2.21       2.17       1.92
                                                       =======    =======    =======    =======    =======    =======
                                                                                                                     
</TABLE>
No. 41956.

#### Protest 165976-G of S. Shawiry (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

From the record it was found that certain items are similar to those involved in *Amrein*v. *United States*(T. D. 49551). The claim at 75 percent under paragraph 1430 was therefore sustained.
# C_2015198EN.01002201.xml

| 15.6.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 198/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.6.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 198/22

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State (Netherlands) lodged on 26 March 2015 — K. Ruijssenaars, A. Jansen, other parties: Staatssecretaris van Infrastructuur en Milieu, Royal Air Maroc

(Case C-145/15)

(2015/C 198/29)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Referring court

Raad van State

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: K. Ruijssenaars, A. Jansen

Applicants:

Other parties: Staatssecretaris van Infrastructuur en Milieu, Royal Air Maroc

Other parties:

Question referred

Question referred

Given that Netherlands law provides access to the civil courts to protect the rights which passengers may derive under EU law from Article 5(1)(c) and Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91 (OJ 2004 L 46, p. 1), does Article 16 of that Regulation oblige the national authorities to take implementing measures which form the basis for administrative enforcement action through the bodies designated under Article 16 separately in each individual case in which Article 5(1)(c) and Article 7 of the Regulation are infringed, in order to be able to guarantee a passenger’s right to compensation separately in each individual case?

---
7 

N 

Ca O 

U p 

~N 

c J 

O Cy 

fSS CG 

C 

J 

O O 

p 

N 

= c 

U 

c 

N U) 

n 

m O 0 0 U N 

02 

V 

N 

~ ~ O 

(~ N n N U <D 

N ~ 2' Q n 

O ~j E 

co 

O 

V U) lo 

co O 0 0 r L Q " a) - 

a) co 

U 

O~ V U) 

L 

O O 

U J 

N f~ N a 4) 

a 

r 

CD 0 

x 

a 

E 

c 

~N Q U 4) (0 

N 

_ 

" N N 

Q 

O O ~- f~ 

O 

.~ "~ 

~ ' ~ + w 

U C- c 4 0 :7 O N -0 m O 

N ° E N 

~, 

J - 

O 

(O 

O 

J 

ca 

~ 

A 

~ 

2 

~ 

C 

N 

d 

o O 

'O 

C "N ' 

U ~ N 

O 7 

[Q O O O c- cD 

M 

a 

u E o c 

~ 

o 

O 

Q u 3 ~ 

C, 

C7 ~ p 

"- 

~ 

m 

N 

a~ 

d 

N n °~ a 

a J 

E 

a) ~ 'm 

m 

- m ... _. u~ 

- 

°' o a E m 

~ 0 .0 

O fl' y m 7 

76 N 

N 

F- ~ EC 

7 J 

N 

Q 

C Q LL 

a 

~a 

L 

N 

X p 

O j. N 

J ~V_ 

" ~? O 

J 

N 

O 

O) 

N 

O 

O 

Y 

3 

U 

0 

0 

O 

m 

a 

E 

m 

c 

0 

a 

0 

in 

c0 

U N 

N 

O 

Z 

I 

Z 

a 

(0 

V
No. 59175.

protest 186307-K (Philadelphia).

#### Robert M. Pitt Company, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

It was stipulated that for duty purposes the clean content of the wool in question was determined in accordance with the instructions contained in T. D. 53159, which was issued following *United States*v. *Fred Whitaker Company, Inc.*(40 C. C. P. A. 19, C. A. D. 492). In that case, it was held that the statutory language, clean content of wool, as used in paragraph 1102 (b), was construed to mean the product commercially usable as wool and from which all the weight of grease and foreign material has been removed, including the wool fibers which are unavoidably and irrevocably lost as a result of commercially applied cleaning processes. Accordingly, the wool in question was held dutiable at the rate applied by the collector on the basis of the percentages of clean content as set forth in the column headed “Clean Content under T. *D.*53159” in schedule “A,” attached to and made a part of the decision in this case.
Exhibit 35.6



|     |  |                                                                                                          
|---- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|LOGO |  | Commercial Mortgage Servicing D1050-084, 8th Fl 401 South Tryon Street
Charlotte, NC 28202 1-800-326-1334

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of February 1, 2016, by and among CITIGROUP COMMERCIAL
MORTGAGE SECURITIES INC, as Depositor, KEYBANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Special Servicer, PENTALPHA SURVEILLANCE LLC, as Operating Advisor and Asset Representations Reviewer, WELLS FARGO
BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator, and WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2016-GC36 (the Agreement). Capitalized terms used
herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

Pursuant to Section 10.08 of this Agreement, I, Dan
Marthinsen, Managing Director of Special Servicing do hereby certify that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities of the Special Servicer during the period from January 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017 (the Reporting Period), and of its performance per the Agreement during such
period has been made under my supervision, and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Special Servicer, has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2018.



|                                    
|------------------------------------
|LOGO                                
|Daniel Marthinsen, Managing Director
|Wells Fargo Bank                    



|                       |  |     
|---------------------- |  | ----
|Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |  | LOGO
(Reap. Dec. 9366)

#### Derby & Co. (Metals & Minerals), Inc. *v.*United States

Entry Nos. C-8201; C-8761; C-10297.

(Decided March 25, 1959)

Plaintiff not represented by connsel.

*George Ooehran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Lawrence, Judge:

Wlien the appeals for a reappraisement enumerated in the schedule, attached to and made part of this decision, were called for hearing, there was no appearance on behalf of plaintiff.

An examination of the official record discloses no reason for disturbing the presumptively correct value for the merchandise found by the appraiser.

I, therefore, find and hold the proper dutiable value of the merchandise covered by said appeals to be the value found by the appraiser. Judgment will be entered accordingly.
```

[110th Congress Public Law 151]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ151.110]

[[Page 121 STAT. 1821]]

Public Law 110-151
110th Congress

                                 An Act

 
  To amend section 1091 of title 18, United States Code, to allow the 
 prosecution of genocide in appropriate circumstances. <<NOTE: Dec. 21, 
                           2007 -  [S. 888]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, <<NOTE: Genocide 
Accountability Act of 2007.>> 
SECTION 1. <<NOTE: 18 USC 1 note.>> SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Genocide Accountability Act of 
2007''.
SEC. 2. GENOCIDE.

    Section 1091 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by striking 
subsection (d) and inserting the following:
    ``(d) Required Circumstance for Offenses.--The circumstance referred 
to in subsections (a) and (c) is that--
            ``(1) the offense is committed in whole or in part within 
        the United States;
            ``(2) the alleged offender is a national of the United 
        States (as that term is defined in section 101 of the 
        Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101));
            ``(3) the alleged offender is an alien lawfully admitted for 
        permanent residence in the United States (as that term is 
        defined in section 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 
        U.S.C. 1101));
            ``(4) the alleged offender is a stateless person whose 
        habitual residence is in the United States; or

[[Page 121 STAT. 1822]]

            ``(5) after the conduct required for the offense occurs, the 
        alleged offender is brought into, or found in, the United 
        States, even if that conduct occurred outside the United 
        States.''.

    Approved December 21, 2007.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--S. 888 (H.R. 2489):
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 110-468 accompanying H.R. 2489 (Comm. on the 
Judiciary).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 153 (2007):
            Mar. 29, considered and passed Senate.
            Dec. 5, considered and passed House.

                                  <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.1

Union Carbide Corporation and Subsidiaries

---

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I,
John R. Dearborn, President and Chief Executive Officer of Union Carbide Corporation (the "Corporation"), certify that:

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Union Carbide Corporation and will be retained by Union Carbide Corporation and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

|/s/JOHN R. DEARBORNJohn R. Dearborn
President and Chief Executive Officer
October 30, 2003 | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | 

32

---

QuickLinks
#### Ignaz Strauss & Co., Inc., by W. J. Byrnes & Co. of New York, Inc. *v.*United States

No. 7596.

Entry No. 769022.

Pro forma invoice dated London, England, February 13, 1946.

Entered at New York, N. Y., June 17, 1946.

(Decided June 8, 1948)

*John D. Rode*for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Johnson, Judge:

The proceeding has been submitted upon a stipulation wherein the parties hereto have agreed that the issues involved in this reappraisement are the same in all material respects as in the case of *United States*v. *Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp.,*33 C. C. P. A. 183, C. A. D. 334. The record in that case was admitted as part of the record herein.

In view of the aforesaid stipulation and accepting same as a statement of fact, and in view of the decision cited, I find and hold that the export value of the merchandise is the value found by the appraiser, less any additions on entry by the importer by reason of advances by the appraiser in similar 'cases to equal the so-called British purchase tax.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly,
# C_2016410EN.01003305.xml

| 7.11.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 410/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.11.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 410/33

---

Order of the General Court of 14 September 2016 — Makhlouf v Council

(Case T-465/15) (1)

1

(2016/C 410/51)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 337, 12.10.2015.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                      5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
Registrant's  Form 10-Q for the quarter  ended July 31, 1998 and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                               JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                                    JUL-31-1998
<CASH>                                                                 1,096,412
<SECURITIES>                                                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                          4,918,578
<ALLOWANCES>                                                             114,321
<INVENTORY>                                                            4,285,043
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                      11,231,164
<PP&E>                                                                 7,037,277
<DEPRECIATION>                                                         9,473,858
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                        22,130,333
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                  3,508,268
<BONDS>                                                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                          0
<PREFERRED>                                                                    0
<COMMON>                                                                 417,826
<OTHER-SE>                                                            13,844,760
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                          22,130,333
<SALES>                                                               19,511,427
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                      19,511,427
<CGS>                                                                 12,428,762
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                         17,829,351
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                         235,715
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                       235,715
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                        1,446,361
<INCOME-TAX>                                                             529,900
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                      916,461
<DISCONTINUED>                                                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                                0
<CHANGES>                                                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                                             916,461
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                                .22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                                .22
        

</TABLE>
### UNPUBLISHED



# UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT



#  R OMMEL V ILLANUEVA -H ERRERA , Petitioner,
v. No. 01-2415



#  J OHN A SHCROFT , Attorney General; U.S. I MMIGRATION & N ATURALIZATION S ERVICE , Respondents. 

# 

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.

(A74-864-246) Submitted: April 3, 2002 Decided: May 1, 2002 Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

COUNSEL Hakeem Ishola, ISHOLA & ASSOCIATES, P.C., Katy, Texas, for Petitioner. Robert D. McCallum, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, John J. Andre, Senior Litigation Counsel, Shelley R. Goad, Office ofImmigration Litigation, Civil Division, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondents.Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

OPINION
PER CURIAM:Rommel Villanueva-Herrera, a native and citizen of the Philippines, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals dismissing his appeal. Villanueva-Herrera claims to have "surrendered himself" to the Immigration and Naturalization Servicefor deportation proceedings in early 1997, when he was statutorily eligible for suspension of deportation. The INS did not institute removal proceedings against him until after April 1, 1997, at which point thelaw changed and he was no longer eligible for suspension of deportation. Villanueva-Herrera argues that the INS violated his due process rights when it delayed instituting deportation proceedings against himuntil he was no longer eligible for suspension of deportation. However, "[t]he Attorney General has discretion regarding when and whether to initiate deportation proceedings," Cortez-Felipe v. INS , 245 F.3d 1054, 1057 (9th Cir. 2001), and we lack jurisdiction to review a "decision or action by the Attorney General to commence proceedings . . . ." 8 U.S.C. § 1252(g). We interpret § 1252(g)’s reference to the "decision . . . to commence proceedings" as encompassing the decision of when to commence proceedings. See Reno v. American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Comm. , 525 U.S. 471, 482-85 (1999). Accordingly, we affirm the Board’s order. We dispense with oralargument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED 2 V ILLANUEVA -H ERRERA v. A SHCROFT
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of
the undersigned officers of United Refining Company, a Pennsylvania corporation (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:



The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended November 30, 2004 (the Form 10-Q) of the Company fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                        |  |     |  |                          |  |                                                 
|----------------------- |  | --- |  | ------------------------ |  | ------------------------------------------------
|Dated: January 14, 2005 |  | By: |  | /s/ John A. Catsimatidis
|                        |  |     |  |                          |  | John A. Catsimatidis Principal Executive Officer
|                        |  |    
|Dated: January 14, 2005 |  | By: |  | /s/ James E. Murphy     
|                        |  |     |  |                          |  | James E. Murphy Principal Financial Officer     



The foregoing
certification is being furnished solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of Form 10-Q or as a separate
disclosure document.



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to United Refining Company and will be retained by United Refining Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2016059EN.01001901.xml

| 15.2.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 59/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.2.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 59/19

---

Order of the President of the General Court of 17 December 2015 — Lysoform Dr. Hans Rosemann and Others v ECHA

(Case T-543/15 R)

((Application for interim measures - REACH - Making available on the market and use of biocidal products - Inclusion of a company as a supplier of an active substance on the list referred to in Article 95 of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 - Application for suspension of operation - Lack of urgency))

(2016/C 059/21)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Lysoform Dr. Hans Rosemann GmbH (Berlin, Germany); Ecolab Deutschland GmbH (Monheim am Rhein, Germany); Schülke & Mayr GmbH (Norderstedt, Germany); and Diversey Europe Operations BV (Utrecht, Netherlands) (represented by: K. Van Maldegem, M. Grunchard, lawyers, and P. Sellar, Advocate)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) (represented by: C. Buchanan and W. Broere, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for suspension of operation of the decision of ECHA of 17 June 2015 to include company O. as a supplier of an active substance on the list referred to in Article 95(1) of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2012 concerning the making available on the market and use of biocidal products (OJ 2012 L 167, p. 1).

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim measures is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim measures is dismissed.

| 2. | Costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Costs are reserved.

---