alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(Reap. Dec. 8865)

#### D. Hauser, Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 770524, etc.

(Decided June 20, 1957)

*Siegel, Mandell & Davidson*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub.*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

*715Wilson, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule “A,” hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the respective parties hereto, subject to the approval of the Court, that the export value of the merchandise at the time of exportation to the United States covered by the Appeals to Reappraisement enumerated on the schedule attached hereto and made a part hereof at which time such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal market of the country from which exported in the usual wholesale quantity and in the ordinary course of trade for export to the United States including costs of containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise ready for shipment to the United States was the invoiced unit values less 2% packed, except as to Item DM 6014 embraced in the entry covered by Appeal to Reappraisement No. 231392-A and merchandise embraced in the entry covered by Appeal to Reappraisement No. 234771-A wherein the export value is the entered unit values less 2% packed.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that there was no higher domestic value for merchandise such or similar to the merchandise herein at the time of exportation thereof.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the Appeals to Re-appraisement enumerated on the schedule attached hereto and made a part hereof may be submitted for decision on the foregoing stipulation.

On tbe agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values were as follows:

> As to the merchandise covered by reappraisement 234771-A and item DM 6014 covered by reappraisement 231392-A, the entered unit values, less 2 per centum, packed.

> As to the balance of the merchandise involved, the invoiced unit values, less 2 per centum, packed.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
Exhibit 32

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

      Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsection (a)
      and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each
      of the undersigned officers of Canal Capital Corporation and Subsidiaries,
      a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify that:

      The Quarterly Report of Form 10-Q for the nine months ended July 31, 2004
      (the "Form 10-Q") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of
      section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
      information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.


Date: September 14, 2004                     /S/ Michael E. Schultz
                                             ------------------------
                                             Chief Executive Officer


Date: September 14, 2004                     /S/ Reginald Schauder
                                             ------------------------
                                             Chief Financial Officer


                                       42
# C_2019295EN.01001401.xml

| 2.9.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 295/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.9.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 295/14

---

Judgment of the General Court of 11 July 2019 — Huhtamäki and Huhtamäki Flexible Packaging Germany v Commission

(Case T-530/15) (1)

(Competition - Cartels - Retail food packaging market - Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU and of Article 53 of the EEA Agreement - Evidence of involvement in the cartel - Single and continuous infringement - Attributability of unlawful conduct - 2006 Guidelines for calculating the amount of fines - Proportionality - Equal treatment)

(2019/C 295/18)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: Huhtamäki Oyj (Espoo, Finland) and Huhtamäki Flexible Packaging Germany GmbH & Co. KG (Ronsberg, Germany) (represented by: H. Meyer-Lindemann, C. Graf York von Wartenburg and L. Stammwitz, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Biolan, F. Jimeno Fernández and L. Wildpanner, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU for, principally, the partial annulment of Commission Decision C(2015) 4336 final of 24 June 2015 relating to a proceeding under Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case AT.39563 — Retail food packaging) and, in the alternative, for the reduction of the fines imposed on the applicants.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Huhtamäki Oyj and Huhtamaki Flexible Packaging Germany GmbH & Co KG to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Huhtamäki Oyj and Huhtamaki Flexible Packaging Germany GmbH & Co KG to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 406, 7.12.2015.

---
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 254 

Recognizing and celebrating the centennial of Oklahoma statehood. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 13, 2007 

Ms. FALLIN (for herself, Mr. COLE of Oklahoma, Mr. BOREN, Mr. LUCAS, 

and Mr. SULLIVAN) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which 

was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Recognizing and celebrating the centennial of Oklahoma 

statehood. 

Whereas on November 16, 1907, Oklahoma officially became 

the 46th State of the Union; 

Whereas prior to becoming a State, Oklahoma was designated 

as Indian Territory, providing a vibrant history and culture that continues to enrich the lives of its citizens; 

Whereas the State of Oklahoma was shaped by those adventurous and daring individuals who embraced the spirit of 

this great Nation as they opened the frontier of the 

American West; 

Whereas generations of proud people from all backgrounds 

have called Oklahoma their home and have contributed to 

its spirited history; 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
2 

•HCON 254 IH 

Whereas these hearty and resilient people have defined what 

has come to be known as the spirit of Oklahoma through 

their strength, character, and persistent strides toward a 

bright future; 

Whereas the continued strength, initiative, and pursuit of excellence displayed by the citizens of the State of Oklahoma have produced its vibrant economy and secured it 

as a place of opportunity and progress now and for future generations; 

Whereas the solid foundation of family and community embraced by the citizens of Oklahoma has been a constant 

guide and source of strength to those citizens throughout 

its history and will remain so long into its future; 

Whereas the natural beauty and abundant resources of the 

State of Oklahoma support a quality of life for its citizens that is unsurpassed; and 

Whereas on November 16, 2007, the State of Oklahoma will 

begin a new century of statehood: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That the Congress recognizes and celebrates 

3 the centennial of Oklahoma statehood and wishes its peo4 ple another hundred years of continued growth, pros5 perity, and achievement. 

Æ 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
Exhibit 32.2

                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the
undersigned, as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of VSE
Corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify that to the best of the
undersigned's knowledge:


	1) the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2007 (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

	2) the information contained in the Company's Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.


Dated: November 9, 2007                  /s/ T. R. Loftus
                                         _____________________________
                                         T. R. Loftus
                                         Executive Vice President and
                                         Chief Financial Officer
                                         (Principal Accounting Officer)
No. 55479.

#### Kuwayama & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 158324-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
EXHIBIT 32.2



             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
               SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Trinity Learning Corporation (the "Company")
Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2006 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Patrick R Quinn, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
          or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
          and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of
          operations of the Company.


Date: May 22, 2006

/S/ Patrick R Quinn
------------------------------------
    Patrick R Quinn
    Chief Financial Officer






         A signed original of this written statement required by Section
         906 has been provided to Trinity Learning Corporation and will be
         retained by it and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
         Commission or its staff upon request.
**
Exhibit 35.1 

Servicer Compliance Statement of Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation 

**NISSAN MOTOR ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION**

**OFFICER’S CERTIFICATE**

The undersigned, Kevin J. Cullum, President and Chief Executive Officer of NISSAN MOTOR ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION, a California corporation (the“Company”), does hereby certify, in his capacity as such corporate officer, as follows: 

(1) The undersigned has caused a reviewof the activities of the Company, in its capacity as Servicer, during the 12-month period ended March 31, 2019 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance pursuant to the Sale and ServicingAgreement, dated as of April 27, 2016 (the “Agreement”), by and among the Company, individually and as servicer, Nissan Auto Receivables Corporation II, as seller, and Nissan Auto Receivables2016-B Owner Trust, to be conducted under his supervision; and 

(2) To the best of theundersigned’s knowledge, based upon such review, the Company has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period. 

This Officer’s Certificate is being furnished pursuant to Item 1123 of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB forpublicly-issued asset-backed securities. Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings assigned to such terms in the Agreement. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have set my hand effective as of the 27th day of June, 2019. 

 

/s/ Kevin J. Cullum
Kevin J. CullumPresident and Chief Executive Officer**
No. 47569.

#### Protests 919933-G, etc., of Central Vermont Railway, Inc., et al. (St. Albans, etc.).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Jose Alfredo OREJEL-RAMIREZ, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 04-10536.

D.C. No. CR-04-00897-FRZ.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 1, 2005.*

Decided Aug. 5, 2005.

*70Susan Baumann, USTU-Office of the U.S. Attorney, Tucson, AZ, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Thomas E. Higgins, Jr., Law Offices of Thomas E. Higgins Jr. Tucson, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before O’SCANNLAIN, CALLAHAN, and BEA, Circuit Judges.

*

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM**

Defendant Jose A. Orejel-Ramirez appeals the sentence he received after pleading guilty to importation of, and possession with intent to distribute, five kilograms or more of cocaine. We have jurisdiction under 18 U.S.C. § 3742. We affirm as to those grounds raised on appeal but remand for consideration of *United States v. Ameline,*409 F.3d 1073 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc).

Orejel-Ramirez challenges his sentence on two grounds, neither of which are persuasive. First, the district court did not clearly err in refusing to designate Orejel-Ramirez as a “minimal” participant under the Federal Sentencing Guidelines, § 3B1.2. *See United States v. Rosales-Rodriguez,*289 F.3d 1106, 1112 (9th Cir.2002). Orejel-Ramirez admitted to being paid to transport a substantial amount of drugs into the United States. *See id.*

*71Second, the determination of *drug*quantity in Orejel-Ramirez’s possession did not impermissibly result in an enhanced sentence based *on*facts not proven to a jury or admitted by the defendant. *See United States v. Booker,*— U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 738, 748-49, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005). The district court’s sentence relied on the fact that both crimes for which Orejel-Ramirez pled guilty had as an element the possession or importation of five or more kilograms of cocaine. *See*21 U.S.C. §§ 952(a) and 960(b)(l)(b)(B)(ii), and 841(b)(l)(ii)(II); *see also United States v. Beaudion,*416 F.3d 965, 970 (9th Cir.2005).

A limited remand is nonetheless appropriate pursuant to *Ameline.*We cannot ascertain from the record whether the sentence “imposed [by the district court] would have been materially different had the district court known that the sentencing guidelines were advisory.” *Id.*at 1074; *see United States v. Moreno-Hernandez,*397 F.3d 1248 (9th Cir.2005), *as amended*— F.3d -, -, 2005 WL 1560269, at *2 (9th Cir. July 5, 2005) (ordering limited remand to unpreserved non-constitutional *Booker*errors). On remand, the district court shall give Orejel-Ramirez the opportunity to indicate if he wishes to pursue resentencing. *See Ameline,*409 F.3d at 1084.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REMANDED IN PART.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
1 The Honorable James M. Rosenbaum, United States District Judge for the

District of Minnesota.



## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 97-2731

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the District of * Minnesota. Christopher Dean Williams, also known * as Scat, also known as Anthony Phillip * [UNPUBLISHED] Hollis, also known as Rodney Flowers, * * Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: October 18, 1999 Filed: October 22, 1999

___________ Before BOWMAN, BEAM, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIUM. Christopher

Williams was tried by jury in the district court 1 and convicted of one count of conspiracy to distribute and possess with intent to distribute cocaine and crack cocaine and one count of using a telephone in connection with a drug offense in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 843(b). On appeal, Williams argues that (1) two witnesses,-2-

James Horton and Tonya Frost, were given something of value in exchange for their testimony in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 201(c)(2) and therefore their testimony should be excluded, (2) the district court gave inadequate jury instructions on the credibility of witnesses testifying in order to receive reduced sentences, (3) Williams's trial should have been severed from that of his co-defendants, (4) the district court erred in admitting the crack cocaine found in a hotel room shared by Williams and two others because the foundation was insufficient, and (5) the evidence as a whole was insufficient.
We consistently have held that the government does not violate section 201(c)(2) by putting on the testimony of witnesses who have received leniency in return for their testimony. See United States v. Albanese , No. 99-1078, slip op. at 8-10 (8th Cir. Oct. 5, 1999). Therefore, the district court was correct in admitting the testimony of Horton and Frost at Williams's trial. Having carefully reviewed the record, we conclude that the district court properly instructed the jury on the credibility of the witnesses, denied the severance of the trials, found a proper foundation to admit the cocaine from the hotel room, and had sufficient evidence to support the conviction. Accordingly, the conviction is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Exhibit 32

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Chiquita Brands International, Inc. (the company), does hereby certify,
to such officers knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 of the company fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the company.

Dated: May 4, 2007



/s/ Fernando AguirreName:

Fernando AguirreTitle:

Chief Executive Officer


Dated: May 4, 2007



/s/ Jeffrey M. ZallaName:

Jeffrey M. ZallaTitle:

Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Chiquita Brands International, Inc. (the company), does hereby certify,
to such officers knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 of the company fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the company.

Dated: August 7, 2009



/s/ Fernando AguirreName: Fernando AguirreTitle: Chief Executive Officer


Dated: August 7, 2009



/s/ Jeffrey M. ZallaName: Jeffrey M. ZallaTitle: Chief Financial Officer
No. 39043.

#### Protest 780721-G (A) of Popper Gray & Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of *Kraft*v. *United States*(T. D. 47955) the protest was sustained.
(logo)Rialto 

         CAPITAL

 

 

**2017 AnnualStatement of Servicer Compliance (Item 1123)**

** **

           Pooling and Servicing Agreement (the “Pooling and Servicing Agreement”) dated asof  March 1, 2016 by and among Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Securities,Inc., as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as General MasterServicer, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC as General Special Servicer, NationalCooperative Bank, N.A. as NCB Master Servicer and NCB Special Servicer, ParkBridge Lender Services LLC as Operating Advisor and Asset RepresentationsReviewer, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as Certificate Administrator,and Wilmington Trust, National Association as Trustee relating to the WellsFargo Commercial Mortgage Trust 2016-C33, Commercial Mortgage Pass-ThroughCertificates, Series 2016-C33 **(WFCM 2016-C33)**

 

Theundersigned, a duly authorized officer of Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, asspecial servicer (the “Special Servicer”) herein certifies to the following:

 

1.       Allservicing activities and performance of such servicing activities under thePooling and Servicing Agreement are performed on behalf of the SpecialServicer.

 

2.       Areview of the servicing activities and performance by the Special Servicer forthe period of January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2017 (the “Reporting Period”) inaccordance with the Pooling and Servicing Agreement has been conducted under mysupervision.

 

3.       To thebest of my knowledge, based on such review, the Special Servicer has fulfilledall of its obligations under the terms of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement,in all material respects for the Reporting Period and if there has been afailure to fulfill any such obligations in any material respect, each failureand the nature and status thereof has been specifically identified herein.

 

 

Certifiedby: /s/ Adam Singer

AdamSinger, Managing Director

 

Date: March 1, 2018
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. (Historicalpurposes)
**Title:****Wisconsin report [electronicresource].**
 
2001 | 2004| 2005 | 2006| 2007
2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016
 
SuDoc:A 57.81/49:
Item Number:0120-C-56 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000616313
 
October 24, 2017
UAS/UAV Aircraft Pre-Flight Check List

 Ensure that all parts and functions of UAV aircraft are in working condition.

 Ensure that the remote controller, battery, and mobile device for controlling 

phantom are fully charged.

 Ensure that there is no foreign objects stuck in lens, micro sd card is inside 

camera, gimbal can rotate freely before powering on.

 Ensure propellers are securely mounted and motors are starting functionally and 

normally. 

 Ensure signal to remote and UAV is connected and stable. Ensure auto return 

home flight is configured in event of loss of signal.

 Calibrate compass and gps for proposed flight.

 Map proposed flight, parameters of flight, outline ideal flight trajectory and map 

out positions before flight.

 Ensure DJI app, aircraft and controller firmware is updated to the latest version.

 Ensure flight area is outside of no fly zones, in a permitted area. Check weather 

and wind conditions for permissible flight.

 Observe local regulations, obtain appropriate authorization, and understand risks 

of flight.