alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Low Wind Speed Technology Phase I: Advanced Power Electronics for Low Wind Speed 

Turbine Applications

Northern Power Systems, Inc.

Project Description: As wind turbine ratings, gear ratios, and torque levels get larger, the challenges in designing a reliable turbine 

gearbox increase. A direct-drive turbine equipped with a low-speed permanent magnet (PM) generator is a design that shows 

promise for megawatt-class wind turbines. By eliminating the gearbox, turbine manufacturers will eliminate the gearbox problems that cause a significant portion of documented turbine downtime and premature failure. 

The generator in a direct-drive wind turbine must operate at very slow rotational speeds, generally less that 20 rpm for megawattclass designs. The PM generator is a simple design approach that, until recently, was not cost effective because of the magnetic 

properties of fero-magnets. The cost of high-energy neodymium iron boron (NdFeB) magnets limited their use to small highspeed machine applications requiring relatively small amounts of 

magnetic material. The substantial decrease in magnet cost over 

the past few years and technical advances in generator design have 

made low-speed megawatt-class PM generators commercially 

practical. 

A successful direct-drive turbine design must incorporate full 

power conversion through an advanced power converter to 

allow reliable variable-speed operation. This project explores 

a range of circuit topologies that are optimized for operation 

with a direct-drive PM generator. After issues such as efficiency, 

maintainability, reliability, and initial cost have undergone careful 

examination, a final circuit design will be selected, built, and tested 

with a 1.5-MW or larger direct-drive PM generator. 

Project Type:	 Component Development

Total Project Budget: 	 $1,672,089

Industry Cost Share:	 $501,627

DOE Cost Share: 	 $1,170,462

Planned Project Duration: October 2002–March 2006

Contacts:

NREL/Sandia: Northern Power Systems, Inc.:

Alan Laxson, NREL	 Jonathan Lynch, NPS

1617 Cole Blvd.	 182 Mad River Park, P.O.Box 999

Golden, Colorado 80401	 Waitsfield, Vermont 05673

303-384-6944

alan_laxson@nrel.gov	 jlynch@nothernpower.com

Current Status: 	 Testing completed in early 2006. Preparation of final report underway.

Concept illustration of an NPS advanced power converter.

A Strong Portfolio for a Strong America • Energy efficiency and clean, renewable energy will mean a stronger economy, a cleaner environment, and greater energy 

independence for America. Working with a wide array of state, community, industry, and university partners, the U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Energy Efficiency 

and Renewable Energy invests in a diverse portfolio of energy technologies.

For more information contact EERE Information Center • 1-877-EERE-INF (1-877-337-3463) • www.eere.energy.gov

Produced for the U.S. Department of Energy by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, a DOE national laboratory

Printed with a renewable-source ink on paper containing at least 50% wastepaper, including 10% post consumer waste.

DOE/GO-102006-2205

March 2006
PROMISSORY NOTE


         For consideration  received,  Coaching Institute Inc, 112 West Business
         Park Drive, Draper, UT 84020 (Borrower) agrees to pay Lona J. Hendricks
         (Lender) according to the following terms:


         Principal amount:                    $50,000

         Annualized Interest Rate:            9.75%

         Term:                                1 year

         Payment Terms:                       Monthly payments of interest only
                                              with balloon payment due on or
                                              before month 12.

         Date of Loan:                        July 1,1999


         This  promissory  note is secured  by the  general  credit of  Coaching
         Institute,  Inc., and at the option of the Lender, a security  interest
         may be filed securing the loan with the assets of the borrower.



          /s/Craig R. Hendricks                        /s/Lona J. Hendricks
          ---------------------                        --------------------
          Coaching Institute, Inc.                     Lender
          Borrower
# C_2016314EN.01000601.xml

| 29.8.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 314/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.8.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 314/6

---

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 22 June 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden — Netherlands) — Gemeente Woerden v Staatsecretaris van Financiën

(Case C-267/15) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Value added tax - Input tax - Deduction))

(2016/C 314/08)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Referring court

Hoge Raad der Nederlanden

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Gemeente Woerden

Applicant:

Defendant: Staatsecretaris van Financiën

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax must be interpreted as meaning that, in circumstances such as those at issue in the main proceedings, in which a taxable person has had a building constructed and has sold that building for a price less than the cost of constructing it, that taxable person is entitled to deduct all of the value added tax paid in respect of the construction of that building, and not only a part of that tax in proportion to the parts of the building which its purchaser uses for economic activities. The fact that that purchaser allows the building at issue to be used without charge is of no importance in that regard.

---

(1)  OJ C 262, 10.8.2015.

1

---
#### Ashish DAVID, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Tamara K. RICH, Officer; et al., Defendants—Appellees.

No. 04-16831.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*808Submitted Aug. 1, 2005.*

Decided Aug. 15, 2005.

Ashish David, Glendale, AZ, pro se.

Sandra A. Shoupe-Gorga, Esq., Holloway, Odegard, Sweeney & Evans P.C., Phoenix, AZ, for Defendants—Appellees.

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, CALLAHAN, and BEA, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Ashish David appeals pro se the district court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that the defendants knowingly violated the double jeopardy clause in order to convict him of a crime. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a summary judgment and, we review for abuse of discretion the denial of leave to amend, and the denial of a request to modify a scheduling order. *Lockheed Martin Corp. v. Network Solutions, Inc.,*194 F.3d 980, 983 (9th Cir.1999) (summary judgment); *Zivkovic v. S. California Edison Co.,*302 F.3d 1080, 1087 (9th Cir.2002) (leave to amend and scheduling order modifications). We may affirm on any ground supported by the record. *Trimble v. City of Santa Rosa,*49 F.3d 583, 584 (9th Cir.1995) (per curiam).

*809The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying David’s motion for leave to amend his complaint, as David filed the motion after the defendants moved for summary judgment. *See Roberts v. Arizona Bd. of Regents,*661 F.2d 796, 798 (9th Cir.1981) (affirming denial of motion to amend raised “after discovery was virtually complete and the [defendant’s] motion for summary judgment was pending before the court”).

The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying David’s motion for an extension of time because David did not establish that the existing deadlines could not reasonably be met. *See Zivkovic,*302 F.3d at 1087.

The district court properly granted summary judgment for Officer Rich after determining that she was entitled to qualified immunity because no evidence established that Officer Rich’s conduct violated a constitutional right. *See Saucier v. Katz,*533 U.S. 194, 201, 121 S.Ct. 2151, 150 L.Ed.2d 272 (2001).

All remaining contentions are unpersuasive.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. (Historicalpurposes)
**Title:****The coyote [electronicresource]**
 
SuDoc:D 12.2:C 63
Item Number:0356
CGP systemNumber:000625096
 
Volume 1
Winter 2003
 
Spring 2004
 
Summer 2004
 
Fall 2004
Volume 2
Winter 2004
 
Spring 2005
 
Summer 2005
 
Fall 2005
 
 
October 23, 2017
#### Henry M. Peyser & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States

No. 6787.

Entry Nos. 756647; 761859.

Invoices dated Manchester, England, April 2, 1946, etc.

Certified April 2, 1946, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., May 1, 1946, etc.

(Decided January 21, 1947)

*Brooks &■ Brooks*for the plaintiffs.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant. '

Mollison, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the app'raised values, less the additions made by the importers on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 103 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 103

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),  
That when the House adjourns on the legislative day of Thursday, March 
29, 2007, or Friday, March 30, 2007, on a motion offered pursuant to 
this concurrent resolution by its Majority Leader or his designee, it 
stand adjourned until 2 p.m. on Monday, April 16, 2007, or until the 
time of any reassembly pursuant to

              

 section 2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first; and 
that when the Senate recesses or adjourns on Thursday, March 29, 2007, 
on a motion offered pursuant to this concurrent resolution by its 
Majority Leader or his designee, it stand recessed or adjourned until 
noon on Tuesday, April 10, 2007, or such other time on that day as may 
be specified by its Majority Leader or his designee in the motion to 
recess or adjourn, or until the time of any reassembly pursuant to 
section 2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first.
    Sec. 2. The Speaker of the House and the Majority Leader of the 
Senate, or their respective designees, acting jointly after 
consultation with the Minority Leader of the House and the Minority 
Leader of the Senate, shall notify the Members of the House and the 
Senate, respectively, to reassemble at such place and time as they may 
designate if, in their opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 29, 2007.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
110th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                            H. CON. RES. 103

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Providing for a conditional adjournment of the House of Representatives 
         and a conditional recess or adjournment of the Senate.
```
# C_2016364EN.01005401.xml

| 3.10.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 364/54 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.10.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 364/54

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 1 August 2016 — Simon v Commission

(Case F-28/15) (1)

((Civil Service - Officials - Pensions - Article 11(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations - Transfer to the EU pension scheme of pension rights acquired under other schemes - Decision on recognition of additional pensionable years applying the new general implementing provisions for Articles 11 and 12 of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations - Article 81 of the Rules of Procedure - Action manifestly unfounded))

(2016/C 364/70)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Anne-Claire Simon (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: J.-N. Louis and N. de Montigny, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented initially by: J. Currall and G. Gattinara, acting as Agents, and subsequently by: G. Gattinara, acting as Agent)

Subject matter of the case

Application for annulment of the final decision on the transfer of the applicant’s pension rights to the European Union pension scheme, which applies the new general implementing provisions (GIPs) of 3 March 2011 for Article 11(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations.

Operative part of the order

| 1) | The action is dismissed as manifestly unfounded. |
| --- | --- |

1)

The action is dismissed as manifestly unfounded.

| 2) | The parties shall bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2)

The parties shall bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 146, 4.5.2015, p. 49.

---
USGS HomeContact USGSSearch USGS

Scientific Investigations Map 2949

Prepared in cooperation with the Iowa Department of Natural  Resources

## **Bathymetric Contour  Maps of Lakes Surveyed in Iowa  in 2004**

By S. Mike Linhart and Kris D. Lund 

U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Map 2949

**AVAILABLE ONLINE ONLY**

----
# C_2016156EN.01004101.xml

| 2.5.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 156/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.5.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 156/41

---

Judgment of the General Court of 16 March 2016 — Dextro Energy v European Commission

Dextro Energy

European Commission

(Case T-100/15) (1)

1

((Consumer protection - Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 - Health claims made on foods, other than those referring to the reduction of disease risk and to children’s development and health - Refusal to authorise certain claims despite the positive opinion of the EFSA - Proportionality - Equal treatment - Duty to state reasons))

(2016/C 156/54)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Dextro Energy GmbH & Co. KG (Krefeld, Germany) (represented by: M. Hagenmeyer and T. Teufer, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: S. Grünheid, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Regulation (EU) 2015/8 of 6 January 2015 refusing to authorise certain health claims made on foods, other than those referring to the reduction of disease risk and to children’s development and health (OJ 2015 L 3, p. 6).

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Dextro Energy GmbH & Co. KG to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Dextro Energy GmbH & Co. KG to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 155, 11.5.2015.

1

---
Order entered September 16, 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 19
- 00569
- CV TERESA WARD COOPER, AS NEXT FRIEND OF JA NE DOE/D.T., Appellant
V. FIRST FINANCIAL BAN K, N.A., Appellee On Appeal from the 380th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 380
- 01566
- 2016



### O RDER
We REINSTATE this appeal as the findings of fact and conclusions of law for which we abated have been filed

. By motion f

iled September 13, 2019, appellant has informed the Court she requested additional or amended findings and conclusions. Although our order abating the appeal directed Collin County District Clerk Lynn Finley to file, no later than September 4, 2019, a sup plemental clerk’s record containing any request for additional or amended findings and conclusions and any additional or amended findings and conclusions, appellant notes no supplemental clerk’s
record has been filed. Appellant asks we order the supplemen tal record be filed.
We GRANT the motion and ORDER Ms. Finley to file a supplemental clerk’s record containing the request for additional or amended findings no later than September 26, 2019. Thesupplemental clerk’s record shall also include any addi tional or amended findings filed by the

trial court or written verification no such findings were made. As the reporter’s record has been filed, we further ORDER appellant to file her opening brief within thirty days of the filing of the supplemental cler k’s record.
We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to send a copy of the order to Ms. Finley and the parties.
/s/ KEN MOLBERG JUSTICE
<PAGE>

                               FIRST AMENDMENT TO
                                CREDIT AGREEMENT
                       BETWEEN MONTEREY PASTA COMPANY AND
                       IMPERIAL BANK DATED AUGUST 2, 1999


This First Amendment ("Amendment") amends that certain Credit Agreement (the
"Agreement") dated August 2, 1999, by and between Monterey Pasta Company
("Borrower") and Imperial Bank ("Bank") as follows:

1.       Paragraph 5.06 is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows:

                  "CAPITAL EXPENDITURES. Make or incur obligations for fixed or
         capital assets, which includes purchase money indebtedness or capital
         lease obligations in excess of $2,750,000 in any one fiscal year."

2.       Except as provided above, the Agreement remains unchanged.

3.       This amendment is effective as of January 5, 2000, and the parties
hereby confirm that the Credit Agreement as amended is in full force and effect.



MONTEREY PASTA COMPANY                        IMPERIAL BANK
"Borrower"                                    "Bank"



By:                                           By:
   --------------------------------              -------------------------------
     Stephen L. Brinkman                                   Brian C. Santos

     Chief Financial Officer                               Vice President

Title:                                        Title:
      -----------------------------                 ----------------------------
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markm an Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Br ian K. Zahra

, Justices 

# Order

February 4, 2011

141624

141629

TRENDA JONES, Successor Personal

Representative and Co

- Personal

Representative, BOOKER T. JONES,

Co

- Personal Representative, and

MARGARET A. JONES, Co

- Personal

Representative, of the Estate of JAMAR

CORTEZ JONES,

Plaintiff s

- Appellees,

v SC: 141624

COA: 288710

Wayne CC: 03

- 327528

- NH

DETROIT MEDICAL CENTER and

SINAI

- GRACE HOSPITAL,

Defendants

- Appellants,

and

DANNY F. WATSON, M.D., and

WILLIAM M. LEUCHTER, P.C.,

Defendants

- Appellees.

_______________________ __________________/

TRENDA JONES, Successor Personal

Representative and Co

- Personal

Representative, BOOKER T. JONES,

Co

- Personal Representative, and

MARGARET A. JONES, Co

- Personal

Representative, of the Estate of JAMAR

CORTEZ JONES,

Plaintiffs

- Appellees,

v SC: 141629

COA: 288710

Wayne CC: 03

- 327528

- NH

DETROIT MEDICAL CENTER and

SINAI

- GRACE HOSPITAL,

Defendants

- Appellees,

and

DANNY F. WATSON, M.D., and

WILLIAM M. LEUCHTER, P.C.,

Defendants

- Appellants.

____________________________________ _____/I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk February 4, 2011

d0201 2

On order of the Court, the applications for leave to appeal the May 20, 2010

judgment of the Court of Appeals are considered, and they are GRANTED. The parties

shall include among the issues to be briefed: (1) whether the probability of injury is a

proper consideration in determining proximate causation, and (2) whether partial

summary disposition may be granted to the plaintiff with regard to proximate causation

where the negligence of the defendant has not been established.

The Michigan A ssociation for Justice and the Michigan Defense Trial Counsel,

Inc. are invited to file briefs amicus curiae. Other persons or groups interested in the

determination of the issues presented in this case may move the Court for permission to

file briefs ami cus curiae.
Exhibit 32.2
 
 
 
 Certification of CFO Pursuant to
 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
 As Adopted Pursuant to
 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of U.S. Energy Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Bryon G. Mowry, Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:
 
 (1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 
 
 
 
 /s/  Bryon G MowryBryon G. Mowry,Principal Accounting OfficerAugust 8, 2011
 
 
 This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
 
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to U.S. Energy Corp. and will be retained by U.S. Energy Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.