alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM UNITED AIR LINES, INC.'S STATEMENT OF CONSOLIDATED
OPERATIONS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND
CONDENSED STATEMENT OF CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL POSITION AS OF
SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000,000

<S>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                  JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                    SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                         9-MOS
<CASH>                                                  870
<SECURITIES>                                            463
<RECEIVABLES>                                         1,742
<ALLOWANCES>                                              0
<INVENTORY>                                             343
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                      3,950
<PP&E>                                               20,377
<DEPRECIATION>                                        5,881
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       21,791
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                 6,108
<BONDS>                                               5,066
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                                  0
<OTHER-SE>                                            5,706
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         21,791
<SALES>                                                   0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     13,514
<CGS>                                                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        12,339
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      280
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                       1,711
<INCOME-TAX>                                            616
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   1,095
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           3
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                          1,092
<EPS-BASIC>                                             0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                             0


</TABLE>
# C_2015065EN.01005301.xml

| 23.2.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 65/53 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.2.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 65/53

---

Action brought on 6 January 2015 — K-Swiss v OHIM (Parallel stripes on a shoe)

(Case T-3/15)

(2015/C 065/72)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: K-Swiss, Inc. (Westlake Village, California, United States) (represented by: R. Niebel, and M. Hecht, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Defendant:

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Trade mark at issue: International registration designating the European Union in respect of the figurative mark (Representation of five parallel stripes placed on the side of a sport shoe) — International registration No 932 758

Trade mark at issue:

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 30 October 2014 in Case R 1093/2014-2

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the contested decision;

| — | Order OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order OHIM to pay the costs.

Pleas in law

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Articles 7(1)(b) and 76 of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Articles 7(1)(b) and 76 of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
#### Globe Shipping Co., Inc., a/c Ascot, Ltd., et al. *v.*United States

No. 6448.

Entry No. 718892, etc.

Invoices dated London, England, September 3, 1941, etc.

Certified September 3, 1941, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., October 10, 1941, etc.

(Decided October 17, 1946)

*John D. Rode*for the plaintiffs.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Mollison, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule A, hereto attached and 'made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importers on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
Exhibit 32

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Chiquita Brands International, Inc. (the company), does hereby certify,
to such officers knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 of the company fully complies with
the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the company.

Dated: November 9, 2006



/s/ Fernando AguirreName: Fernando AguirreTitle: Chief Executive Officer


Dated: November 9, 2006



/s/ Jeffrey M. ZallaName: Jeffrey M. ZallaTitle: Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 35.1

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

In connection with the Annual
Report on Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2016-1 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019, (the “Report”), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Santander Consumer USA Inc. (the “Servicer”),
does hereby certify and represent that:

| | 1. | A review of the activities and performance of the Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of February 17, 2016, among Santander Drive Auto Receivables LLC, Santander Consumer USA
Inc., Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2016-1 and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (the “Agreement”) during the period that is the subject of the Report has been made under my supervision.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement
in all material respects throughout the period that is the subject of the Report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | SANTANDER CONSUMER USA INC.
| | ---------------------------
| |                            
| | By:                        
| | Name:                      
| | Title:                     
| | Date:                      
| |                            
| | By:                        
| | Name:                      
| | Title:                     
| | Date:
#### United States *v.*Railway Express Agency, Inc.

No. 6267.

Entry No. W-142.

Invoice dated Santa Clara, Cuba, —.

Certified September 1944.

Entered at West Palm Beach, Fla., October 2, 1944.

(Decided March 28, 1946)

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General *(Dorothy C. Bennett,*special attorney), for the plaintiff.

Defendant not represented by counsel.

Cole, Judge:

This case concerns the proper dutiable value of cigars exported from Cuba in September 1944 and entered at the port of Miami, Fla., in October 1944.

At the hearing in Miami on February 28, 1946, the parties submitted the appeal on a stipulation, agreeing that at the time of exportation of the instant merchandise, such or similar cigars were freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of Cuba, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, at the following values, *340the prices for home consumption of such or similar merchandise being-no higher:

*Consular invoice No. Item, Value (per*thousand>

379_ 3,000 Med. Coronas 25’s $99

379.. 3,000 Petit de Lis 25’s. _ 84

385_ 2,500 Londres 50’s_ 75

385_ 1,000 Petit de Lis 50’s__ 80

385_ 1,000 Cremas 50’s_ 115

385_ 1,000 Med. Coronas 50’s 95

385_ 500 Especiales 25’s_ 119

385_ 500 Nacionales 50’s_ 125

380_ 2,000 Londres 50’s_ 75

380_ 2,000 Panetelas 50’s_ 75

380_ 2,000 Petit de Lis 50’s_— 80

380_ 1,000 Petit de Lis 25’s__ 84

380_ 2,000 Med. Coronas 50’s 95

380_ 1,000 Med. Coronas 25’s. 99

All of the foregoing prices are net, packed.

On the agreed facts, I find export value, section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. 1940 ed § 1402 (d)), to be the proper basis for appraisement of the cigars in question, and that such statutory-values are those hereinabove set forth for the items enumerated.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
#### I. F. L. Corp. et al. *v.*United States

No. 6710.

Entry No. 730001, etc.

Invoices dated London, England, March 1945, etc.

Certified March 1945, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., May 1, 1945, etc.

(Decided January 7, 1947)

*Siegel, Mandell & Davidson*for the plaintiffs.

*Paul P. Bao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Tilson, Judge:

The appeals listed in schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted upon a stipulation to the effect that the issues in these appeals and the issues in *United States*v. *Pitcairn,*C. A. D. 334, are in all material respects similar, and the record in that case has been admitted in evidence herein.

Upon the agreed facts, and following the cited authority, I find and hold the proper dutiable export values of the merchandise covered by these appeals to be the values found by the appraiser, less any amounts added by the importers on entry to meet advances made by the appraiser in similar cases then pending on appeal. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of
the undersigned officers of United Refining Company, a Pennsylvania corporation (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:



The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended May 31, 2005 (the Form 10-Q) of the Company fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                          |  |                            
|-------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ------------------------ |  | ---------------------------
|Dated: July 14, 2005 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ John A. Catsimatidis
|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                          |  | John A. Catsimatidis       
|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                          |  | Principal Executive Officer
|                     |  |  | 
|Dated: July 14, 2005 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ James E. Murphy     
|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                          |  | James E. Murphy            
|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                          |  | Principal Financial Officer



The foregoing
certification is being furnished solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of this Form 10-Q or as a separate
disclosure document.



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to United Refining Company and will be retained by United Refining Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Before the Second Division,

February 16, 1942

No. 46950.

#### Protests 964858-G, etc., of Artistic Foundations, Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items consist of laces made on a bobbinet-jaequard machine and are similar to those involved in Abstract 41121, the protests were sustained.
No. 39069.

#### Protests 941710-G, etc., of S. Alioto & Sons et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

On the authority of *Locatelli*v. *United States*(T. D. 48284) the protests were sustained.
# Resource Descriptions

The National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta), your gateway to information across DOE, provides access to all Science Accelerator content and more. 

***Science Accelerator content  remains available via the individual information collections below:***

Locate collections of scientific research data and multimedia generated in the course of DOE-funded research.  More information is available at    *DOE Data Explorer*. 

Discover outcomes of past DOE R&D which have had significant economic impact, improved people's lives, or  been widely recognized as a remarkable advance in science. More information is available at *DOE R&D Accomplishments*.

DOE laboratory technology transfer websites and databases. More information is available at *DOE Technology Transfer*. 

Search and retrieve patent information from a  collection of patent records.  More information is available at DOepatents.

Search and acquire scientific and technical software representing the latest in federally funded technology. More information is available at Energy Science and Technology Software.

 Access e-print Web sites and databases; use E-Print Alerts for weekly updates.  More information is available at  *E-Print      Network*. 

Explore multimedia videos about DOE and other science research. More information is available at *ScienceCinema*. 

Full-text DOE documents and bibliographic records (supersedes DOE Information Bridge, Energy Citations Database).  More information is available at *SciTech Connect*.

Top ↑

        - 
        - 
        -  Website Policies/Important Links
        - 
        - 
        -
PUBLIC LAW 110–242—JUNE 3, 2008 122 STAT. 1567 

Public Law 110–242 

110th Congress 

An Act 

To make technical corrections to section 1244 of the National Defense Authorization 

Act for Fiscal Year 2008, which provides special immigrant status for certain 

Iraqis, and for other purposes. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. TECHNICAL CORRECTIONS TO PROVISION GRANTING SPECIAL IMMIGRANT STATUS FOR CERTAIN IRAQIS. 

Section 1244(c) of the National Defense Authorization Act for 

Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181) is amended— 

(1) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘each of the five years 

beginning after the date of the enactment of this Act’’ and 

inserting ‘‘fiscal years 2008 through 2012’’; and 

(2) in paragraph (3)— 

(A) in subparagraph (A)— 

(i) in the subparagraph heading, by striking ‘‘ONE

THROUGH FOUR’’ and inserting ‘‘2008 THROUGH 2011’’; 

and 

(ii) by striking ‘‘one through four’’ and inserting 

‘‘2008 through 2011’’; and 

(B) in subparagraph (B)— 

(i) in the matter preceding clause (i)— 

(I) in the subparagraph heading, by striking 

‘‘FIVE AND SIX’’ and inserting ‘‘2012 AND 2013’’; 

(II) by striking ‘‘the fifth fiscal year beginning 

after the date of the enactment of this Act’’ and 

inserting ‘‘fiscal year 2012’’; and 

(III) by striking ‘‘the sixth fiscal year beginning after such date’’ and inserting ‘‘fiscal year 

2013’’; and 

(ii) in each of clauses (i) and (ii), by striking ‘‘the 

fifth fiscal year’’ and inserting ‘‘fiscal year 2012’’. 

SEC. 2. AUTHORITY TO CONVERT PETITIONS DURING TRANSITION 

PERIOD. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Homeland Security or the 

Secretary of State may convert an approved petition for special 

immigrant status under section 1059 of the National Defense 

Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006 (8 U.S.C. 1101 note) with 

respect to which a visa under such section 1059 is not immediately 

available to an approved petition for special immigrant status under 

section 1244 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 

Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181) notwithstanding any requirement 

of subsection (a) or (b) of such section 1244 but subject to the 

8 USC 1101 note. 

Ante, p. 397. 

8 USC 1157 note. 

June 3, 2008 

[S. 2829] 


jbridges on POFP91QD1 with PUBLIC LAWS
122 STAT. 1568 PUBLIC LAW 110–242—JUNE 3, 2008 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 2829: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 154 (2008): 

Apr. 28, considered and passed Senate. 

May 19, 21, considered and passed House. 

Æ 

numerical limitations applicable under subsection (c) of such section 

1244, as amended by this Act. 

(b) DURATION.—The authority under subsection (a) shall be 

available only with respect to petitions filed before October 1, 2008. 

Approved June 3, 2008. 


jbridges on POFP91QD1 with PUBLIC LAWS
Thursday, March 25, 1999

Mr. Peter Rogina
President
High Speed Network Solutions, Inc.
1 Waldron Drive
Martinsville, NJ  08836-2201

Dear Pete,

Pursuant to discussions held today between you and Summus,  Ltd., we have agreed
to execute an agency  agreement  between  HSNS and Summus Ltd.  For  purposes of
facilitating  negotiations  with Samsung.  This agency  agreement is intended to
address products not incorporated  within the Marketing  License  Agreement with
HSNS has  executed  and for which  Summus is  awaiting  completion  of the first
$750,000 payment. Both this Marketing License agreement and the agency agreement
will be execute  before our planned joint trip in April to Samsung in Korea.  We
have agreed that the agency  agreement will  incorporate the following  business
terms.

1.       In the event of a conflict  between  the  Marketing  License  agreement
         and the  agency  agreement,  the  Marketing License agreement will have
         precedence.

2.       HSNS will  receive an 18%  agent's  commission  on  revenues  to Summus
         Limited  generated,  as a result of the negotiations with Samsung,  and
         which are note otherwise covered by the Marketing License Agreement.

3.       Summus will not reimburse HSNS for any direct  expenses  related to its
         participation  in these  negotiations  or for its costs incurred in the
         fulfillment of its responsibilities under the agreement.

4.       The term of the agency agreement will be for 1 year.

5.       The agency agreement will solely relate to discussions with Samsung.

These terms are mutually accepted on behalf of HSNS and Summus by:


Summus, Ltd.                                    High Speed Net Solutions, Inc.

/s/ Daniel E. Stansky                           /s/ Peter R. Rogina
Daniel E. Stansky COO                           Peter R. Rogina, President
| (logo) WELLS

            FARGO | **Commercial  Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084,  8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334

 

  |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

 

Reference is hereby made to that certain Poolingand Servicing Agreement dated as of May 1, 2016, by and among CITIGROUPCOMMERCIAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES INC., as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONALASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, LNR PARTNERS, LLC, as Special Servicer, PARKBRIDGE LENDER SERVICES, LLC, as Operating Advisor and Asset RepresentationsReviewer, CITIBANK N.A., as Certificate Administrator, and DEUTSCHE BANK TRUSTCOMPANY AMERICAS as Trustee, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-ThroughCertificates, Series 2016-C1 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized termsused herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in theAgreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 10.08 of thisAgreement, I, Leslie Hayton, Managing Director of Commercial Mortgage Servicesdo hereby certify that:

 

1.       Areview of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January1, 2018 through December 31, 2018 (the “Reporting Period”), and of itsperformance per the Agreement during such period has been made under mysupervision, and

 

2.       To thebest of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilledall of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughoutthe Reporting Period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day ofFebruary 2019.

 

 

/s/Leslie Hayton

LeslieHayton

ManagingDirector

WellsFargo Bank

 

 

| Wells  Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together  we’ll go far |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
## IN THE COU RT O F CR IM IN AL AP PE ALS OF TE XAS
N O . A P - 76, 023

EX PA R TE LE O N A R D R EE D , A ppl i c ant

ON AP P LI CAT I ON F OR A W RI T OF HABE AS CORP US C A U S E N O . 1 0 7 3 5 9 7 W I N C R I M I N A L D I S T R I C T C O U R T N O . 3

FROM TARRA NT CO UNTY

P er cur i am . O P I N I O N Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Crimi n al P ro ce d ure, the cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for wr it of habea s corpus. Ex pa rte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant wa s convicted o f t h eft and sentenc ed to two (2) y ear s’ imprisonment. He did not appeal his conviction. Applicant alleg es inter alia that he ha s a lr e a dy be e n p ro se c ute d an d co nv ic te d f or thi s o ff e ns e in municipal c ourt and that his subse quent conviction for the same offe nse in Criminal District Court No. 3 violates the Double J eopar dy clause of the United States Constitution. The trial judg e has e ntere d finding s of fac t a nd conclusions of lawrec ommending that relief2

be g ra nte d. Spe c if

ic a lly , the tr ia l judg e fo un d tha t the c ha rg e s in this ca se we re ini tia lly br ou g ht i n municipal court, that Applica nt pleaded guilty , and the municipal judg e ente red a judgme nt on May 21, 2008. The State subseque ntly broug ht the same c h ar ges i n C ri minal District Court No. 3, Applicant plea ded g uilty , and the district judg e ente red a judgme nt on Aug ust 16, 2007. The trial jud g e fo un d that Ap pli c a nt wa s pr os e c ute d tw ic e fo r the same of fe ns e in vio la tio n of t he D ouble J eopar dy clause . We ag ree . Relief is g rante d. The judgme nt in Cause No. 1073597W in the Criminal District Court No. 3 of Ta rr a nt County is se t asi de , an d App lic a nt is re mand e d to the c us tod y of the She ri ff

of Ta rr a nt County to answer

the cha rg es ag ainst him

. Ap p l i cant’ s remaining claims are dismiss ed. See E x parte Torres , 943 S.W .2d 469 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997). Copies of this opinion s hall be sent to the Te x as De partment o f Crim in a l Ju s ti c e

– Co r

rec tional I nstitut ions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.

Deliver ed: Octobe r 15, 2008 Do No t Pu

bli sh