alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Office of the United States Trade Representative

# AGENCY:

Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR). 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

As a result of becoming EU Member States on January 1, 2007, Bulgaria and Romania are no longer designated as beneficiary developing countries under the U.S. GSP program, effective as of that date. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

GSP Subcommittee, Office of the United States Trade Representative, USTR Annex, 1724 F Street, NW., Room F220, Washington, DC 20508. The telephone number is 202-395-6971. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The GSP program is authorized pursuant to title V of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (“the Trade Act”) (19 U.S.C. 2461*et seq.*). The GSP program grants duty-free treatment to designated eligible articles that are imported from designated beneficiary developing countries. Countries that may not be designated as beneficiary countries for purposes of the GSP include, among others, EU Member States (19 U.S.C. 2462(b)). In Proclamation 8098 (December 29, 2006), the President, pursuant to section 502(b)(1)(C) of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2462(b)(1)(C)), announced that “Bulgaria and Romania shall no longer be designated as beneficiary developing countries for GSP upon the date that each country becomes a European Union Member State. The United States Trade Representative shall announce each such date in a notice published in the                     **Federal Register**                    .” The United States Trade Representative hereby announces that January 1, 2007, was the date on which Bulgaria and Romania became EU Member States and are no longer beneficiary developing countries for GSP.                 

Susan C. Schwab, 

United States Trade Representative.

[FR Doc. E7-809 Filed 1-19-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3190-W7-P
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. J U A N M O N TES- TO RRES, D e f

e n d a n t - A p p e lla n t. N o. 12- 50159 D . C . N o . 3 : 1 1 - c r - 0 1 4 2 4 - MMA ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e S o u th e rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia M i c ha e l M . A ne l l o, D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d M a y14, 2013 ** B efo re: L E A V Y , T H O M A S , an dM U R G U IA , C i rcu i tJu d g es. J ua n M ont e s - T orr e s appe a l s f r om the di s tr i c tc ourt ’ s j udgm e nta nd c h a lle n g e s th e o r d e rd e n y in g h is m o tio n to d is m is s th e in d ic tm e n t c h a r g in g h im w i th b e i n g ad e p o rt e d a l i e n f o u n di n th e U n i t e dSt a t e s , i n v i o l a t i o n o f 8 U . S. C. § 1 3 2 6 . W e d i sm i ss. 

# FI LED MA Y21 2 013 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS12- 50159 2 T h e g o v ern m en targ u es th atth i s ap p eal sh o u l db e d i sm i ssed b ecau se M ont e s - T orr e s w a i ve d hi s r i ghtt o appe a l pr e tr i a l c ons t i tut i ona l de f e c t s w he n he e nt e r e d a n unc ondi t i ona l gui l typl e a . W e r e vi e w de novo w he the rade f e nda nt w a iv e d h is r ig h t to ap p e a l. See U n i ted S ta tes v. A ri a s-Esp i n o sa , 704 F . 3d 616, 618 (9th C i r. 20 12 ). W h e n M o n te s - T o rr e s e n te r e dh is g u iltyp le a , h e d idn o t p r e s e rv e h is r ig h t to ch al l en g e th e d i stri ctco u rt ’ s d en i al o f h i s m o t i o n t o d i sm i ss th e i n d i ctm en t . T h u s, h e w a iv e d h is r ig h t to b r in g th is ap p e a l. Se e U n ite d S ta tes v . L o

p ez -A rm e n ta , 400 F . 3d 1173, 1175 ( 9th C i r . 2005) . C ontr a ryt o M ont e s - T orr e s ’ s c ont e nt i on, the di s tr i c tc ourt ’ s s t a t e m e nta tthe s ubs e que nts e nt e nc i ng he a r i ng tha the r e t a i ne d the r ig h t to ap p e a l d idn o t r e s to r e h is r ig h t to ap p e a l th e c o u rt’s d e n ia l o f h is m o tio n to d is m is s . Se e i d. a t1176- 77. DI S MI S S E D.
EXHIBIT 32.2
 
 
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
 SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In connection with the quarterly report of United-Guardian, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the three-month period ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Robert S. Rubinger, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (i) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (ii) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented and results of operations of the Company for the periods presented.
 
 
 Date:  August 10, 2010                                                                          By: /s/ Robert S. Rubinger
 Robert S. Rubinger
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

RANDALL ORVIS BURCH, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-1121 ) MARY ELIZABETH HUNTER, ) ) Appellee. ) ___________________________________) Opinion filed December 5, 2018. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Charlotte County; Leigh Frizzell Hayes, Judge. Randall Orvis Burch, pro se. Mary Elizabeth Hunter, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
LaROSE, C.J., and KHOUZAM and BLACK, JJ., Concur.
# C_2016410EN.01001401.xml

| 7.11.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 410/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.11.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 410/14

---

Judgment of the General Court of 22 September 2016 — Grupo de originación y análisis v EUIPO — Bankinter (BK PARTNERS)

(Case T-228/15) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative mark BK PARTNERS - Earlier national word and figurative mark bk. - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2016/C 410/17)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Grupo de originacion y análisis, SL (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: A. Burgueño Minguela and H. Pequerul Palenciano, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: B. Uriarte Valiente and J. Crespo Carrillo, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Bankinter, SA (Madrid) (represented by: A. Gómez López, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 5 March 2015 (Case R 1329/2014-1), relating to opposition proceedings between Bankinter and Grupo de originación y análisis.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Grupo de originación y análisis, SL to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Grupo de originación y análisis, SL to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 213, 29.6.2015.

1

---
# Official Journal C 83I/2020

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 083I |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6313 March 2020 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 083I

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6313 March 2020

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | Council |
| 2020/C 83 I/01 | Notice for the attention of the persons and entities subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2014/145/CFSP, as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2020/399, and in Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/398 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine | 1 |
| 2020/C 83 I/02 | Notice for the attention of the data subjects to whom the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2014/145/CFSP and Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine apply | 3 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

Council

2020/C 83 I/01

Notice for the attention of the persons and entities subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2014/145/CFSP, as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2020/399, and in Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/398 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine

1

2020/C 83 I/02

Notice for the attention of the data subjects to whom the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2014/145/CFSP and Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine apply

3

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
No. 47594.

#### Protests 66895-K/90530, etc., of N. Shure Co. (Chicago).

*421Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

At the trial it was ¿greed between counsel that the merchandise in question consists of manufactures of metal, not specially provided for, composed in chief value of lead, not plated, and was held dutiable according to weight, as stipulated, at 3 cents per pound but not less than *22%*percent nor more than 45 percent ad valorem under paragraph 397 and T. D. 49753, as claimed.
|  EXHIBIT      32.1                               |
|-------------------------------------------------------|
|  Union Carbide Corporation and      Subsidiaries |
|                                                  |

| 1. | the      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Corporation for the quarter ended      September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange      Commission (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;  and |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Corporation. |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/      PATRICK E. GOTTSCHALK                                       |   |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
| Patrick      E. GottschalkPresident      and Chief Executive Officer |   |   |
| Date:      October 30, 2009                                          |   |   |

----
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v ROBERT A. SMITH, Private E-1, U. S. Army, Appellant

9 USCMA 347, 26 CMR 127

*348No. 11,304

Decided June 6, 1958

*Captain John F. Christensen*and *First Lieutenant Frank J. Lane, Jr.,*were on the brief for Appellant, Accused.

*Lieutenant Colonel John G. Lee*and *First Lieutenant John E. Riecker*were on the brief for Appellee, United States.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam :

The accused pleaded guilty and was convicted of two violations of the Uniform Code of Military Justice. He was sentenced to a bad-conduct discharge, total forfeitures, and confinement at hard labor for one year. Intermediate appellate authorities affirmed the findings and sentence as imposed by the court-martial but suspended the bad-conduct discharge. We granted review to consider whether it was improper for the staff judge advocate to include a reference to a juvenile conviction in the clemency section of his post-trial review.

In United States v Barrow, 9 USCMA 343, 26 CMR 123, decided this day, this Court held that a reviewing authority may consider juvenile misdeeds and convictions in order to guide him in his action on the sentence. For the reasons expressed therein, the decision of the board of review is affirmed.
June 14, 2012

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

CUSTOM TRANSIT, L.P., RICHWAY CARTAGE, INC., AND CUSTOM 

OPERATIONS, LLC, Appellants

NO. 14-10-00936-CV V.

FLATROLLED STEEL, INC., Appellee

____________________

This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of appellee, FLATROLLED 

STEEL, INC., signed July 9, 2010, was heard on the transcript of the record. We have 

inspected the record and find the trial court erred. We therefore REVERSE the trial 

court’s judgment insofar as it awards actual damages for negligence, exemplary damages, 

pre-judgment interest, post-judgment interest, and taxable costs against RICHWAY 

CARTAGE, INC. and RENDER judgment that FLATROLLED STEEL, INC. take 

nothing as to RICHWAY CARTAGE, INC. Further, we find no error in the remainder of 

the judgment and order it AFFIRMED.

Each party shall be responsible for their own costs incurred because of this appeal. 

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
(Reap. Dec. 9354)

#### Plywood & Door Northern Corporation *v.*United States

Entry No. 932614- 1/2, etc.

(Decided March 19, 1959)

*James Wilson Young*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Mollison, Judge:

Counsel for the parties have submitted the appeals for reappraisement enumerated in schedule *“A,”*attached hereto, upon a stipulation on the basis of which I find that, except for the items of merchandise set forth in schedule “B,” also attached hereto, the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise involved in the said appeals for reappraisement is foreign value, as defined in section 402(c), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and that such value, in each instance, is the appraised unit value, less 2 per centum, net, packed.

The appeals for reappraisement having been abandoned as to the merchandise specified in schedule “B,” they are, to that extent, dismissed.

Judgment will issue accordingly.

Schedule “B”

Reappraisement No. Collector’s No. Entry No. Date of export

R58/17279 06225 932614-1/2 4/11/57

Birch plywood as follows:

BB grade, thick, 48" x 30"

R58/17280 06226 953585 5/17/57

Birch plywood as follows:

BJ/BB grade, *%”*thick, 60" x 60"
|WELLS
    FARGO(logo) | Corporate
                                                       Trust Services
                                                       MAC R1204-010
                                                       9062 Old Annapolis Road
                                                       Columbia, MD 21045
                                                       Tel: 410 884 2000
                                                       Fax: 410 715 2380
|--------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Re: 	     Annual Statement of Compliance for COMM 2016-CCRE28 Mortgage Trust Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates,
Series 2016-CCRE28



Per the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of February 1, 2016 (the “Agreement”), the undersigned,
a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator (“Wells Fargo”), hereby certifies
as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2016 (the “Reporting Period”):





(a)
A review of Wells Fargo’s activities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under the Agreement has been made
under such officer’s supervision; and



(b)To the best of
such officer’s knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in
all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.





February 27, 2017



|/s/
    BRIAN SMITH | 
|------------------- | 
|BRIAN
    SMITH     | 
|Vice
    President  | 



|Wells
    Fargo Bank, N.A. | Together
    we’ll go far
|-------------------------- | -------------------------
No. 62041.

#### Empacadora Trevino, S. A. *v.*United States,

protests 234409-K, etc. (Laredo).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation, of counsel that the merchandise consists of meats, prepared or preserved, not specially provided for, similar in all material respects to the meat "the subject of *United States*v. *Mercantil Distribuidora, S. A., et al.*(45 C. C. P. A. 20, C. A. D. 667), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Exhibit 32.1CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, R. Bruce McDonald , certify, as of the date hereof, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Adient plc on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2016 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Adient plc.


Date:11/29/2016By:/s/ R. Bruce McDonaldR. Bruce McDonaldChief Executive Officer


I, Jeffrey M. Stafeil , certify, as of the date hereof, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Adient plc on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2016 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Adient plc.


Date:11/29/2016By:/s/ Jeffrey M. StafeilJeffrey M. StafeilExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Adient plc and will be retained by Adient plc and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Francisco Jose TORRES-VASQUEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 03-40835.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Oct. 5, 2005.

James Lee Turner, John Richard Berry, Assistant U.S. Attorneys, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Reynaldo Santos Cantu, Jr., Roland E. Dahlin, II, Federal Public Defender, Laura Fletcher Leavitt, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, GARZA, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

*ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES*

PER CURIAM: *

This court affirmed the judgment of conviction and sentence of Francisco Jose Torres-Vasquez. *United States v. Torres-Vasquez,*No. 03-40835 (5th Cir. Feb. 18, 2004). The Supreme Court vacated and remanded for further consideration in light of *United States v. Booker,*— U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005). *See Salas v. United States,*— U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 1111, 160 L.Ed.2d 991 (2005). We requested and received supplemental letter briefs addressing the impact of *Booker.*

Torres-Vasquez argues that he is entitled to resentencing because the district court sentenced him under a mandatory application of the United States Sentencing Guidelines prohibited by *Booker.*This court will not consider a Booker-related challenge raised for the first time in a petition for certiorari absent extraordinary *637circumstances. *United States v. Taylor,*409 F.3d 675, 676 (5th Cir.2005).

Torres-Vasquez cannot make the necessary showing of plain error that is required by our precedent in *United States v. Mares,*402 F.3d 511, 520 n. 9 (5th Cir.2005), *petition for cert. filed*(Mar. 31, 2005) (No. 04-9517). Torres-Vasquez has also failed to meet the much more demanding standard for extraordinary circumstances warranting review of an issue raised for the first time in a petition for certiorari. *See Taylor,*409 F.3d at 677. Moreover, this court has rejected his argument that a *Booker*error is a structural error or that such error is presumed to be prejudicial. *See Mares,*402 F.3d at 520-22; *see also United States v. Malveaux,*411 F.3d 558, 560 n. 9 (5th Cir.2005), *petition for cert. filed*(July 11, 2005) (No. 05-5297).

Because nothing in the Supreme Court’s *Booker*decision requires us to change our prior affirmance in this case, we reinstate our judgment affirming Torres-Vasquez’s conviction and sentence.

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
January 2, 1968

No. 67-22.

#### United States v Harold Dean Aleshire, Formerly BM3, U. S. Navy (NCM 67-0211).

ORDERED by the Court that said Petition be, and the same is, hereby dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.