alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ex_357823.htm


Exhibit 4.26


 





 


 


January 13, 2022


 


Ramon Mohanlal


219 west 81 street unit 6D


New York, NY


US 10024


 


Dear Ramon,


 


We would like to thank you for your commitment to BeyondSpring. Your contributions to the organizations are valued, and we look forward to the new year and to working together to make plinabulin available to patients in need.


 


We have had to make the difficult decision to prioritize the Company’s goals and objectives to optimize resources to bring the most value from the plinabulin franchise and patients. We consider you as an important contributor to this more-focused plan, and hope that you will make the commitment to help BeyondSpring achieve its critical clinical and regulatory goals over the next two years. We have great confidence that we have the right plan in place to go forward, and that it will bring success to the plinabulin programs, and to each of us, individually.


 


We are offering several improvements to your compensation and benefits package, as well as a retention package, to help secure your commitment to achieving our two-year goals. A summary of your revised compensation package can be found below. Your entitlement to the all components of the compensation package, including the retention-related provisions, is contingent upon your continued satisfactory job performance. In the event of your termination by the company for reasons other than performance and voluntary resignation, you will still be entitled to receive all components of the Summary of Compensation shown below.


 


We are excited to continue working with you and believe that we can, together, achieve great success for plinabulin and for BeyondSpring!


 


Best regards,


	/s/ Lan Huang	 



Lan Huang, CEO, Chairman and Co-Founder


BeyondSpring Inc.


28 Liberty St. 39th Floor


New York, NY 10005


 


 


 


 


 




 


BeyondSpring Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | 28 Liberty, 39th Floor | New York, NY 10005


Main Tel: (646) 305-6387


www.beyondspringpharma.com





 










 











Compensation and Retention Summary


 


January 13, 2022


Ramon Mohanlal


 


	 	
			●

				
			2021 Base Salary: $_430,000.00_

			



 


	 	
			●

				
			2021 Bonus Award (50% of target): $_96,750.00_ (to be paid approx. February 15,2022)

			



 


	 	
			●

				
			2022 Cost of Living Adjustment (COLA): 4% = $_17,200.00_

			



 


	 	
			●

				
			New 2022 Base Salary: $_447,200.00_

			



 


	 	
			●

				
			2022 Target Performance Bonus, paid in February 2023 (75% cash, 25% options):


			$_150,930.00_ (33.75% of 2022 Base Salary)

			



 


	 	
			●

				
			Retention Bonus (subject continued satisfactory performance): $_387,000.00_ (100% options; 50% payable on 12/31/2022 and 50% payable on 12/31/2023)

			



 


	 	
			●

				
			Company will increase its contribution to cost of medical benefits to 100%.

			



 


	 	
			●

				
			In lieu of the current 401K match in 2022, Company will make a one-time contribution to your 401K retirement savings account equal to 6% of your base salary, up to maximum allowable by IRS regulations.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 

 

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q ofUnico American Corporation (the "Company") for the period ended September 30, 2018, as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Cary L. Cheldin, Chief Executive Officer of theCompany, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

 

1.      the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

  

      /s/ Cary L. Cheldin

Name:   Cary L. Cheldin

Title:      Chairman of the Board, Presidentand Chief Executive Officer

Date:     November15, 2018
(Reap. Dec. 9791)

#### Sears, Roebuck and Co., c/o Frank P. Dow Co., Inc. *v.*United States

Entry Nos. 2201; 264; 3596.

(Decided October 3, 1960)

*Lane, Young & Foco*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Dotib,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Wilson, Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation entered into between counsel for the respective parties:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the parties hereto, subject to the approval of the Court, that the merchandise covered by the above appeals for reappraisement consists of bamboo blinds, bamboo porch shades, and sets of hardware accessories imported from Japan; and that each bamboo blind and bamboo porch shade, as invoiced, is accompanied by one set of hardware accessories.

> That on or about the dates of exportation of the merchandise hereinbefore described, such or similar .merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of Japan, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade for exportation to the United States, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges, and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition packed ready for shipment to the United States, as follows: The merehan-*496dise covered by tbe invoices of Oriental Blind Co., Ltd. at tbe appraised unit values, plus bale and packing charge, as invoiced; and tbe merchandise covered by tbe invoices of Daimaru Kogyo Kaisha, Ltd. at tbe appraised unit values, packed; that said unit values include tbe cost of tbe sets of hardware accessories, which cost is S cents (U.S. Cy) per set of hardware accessories; and that there was no higher foreign value.

> That the above appeals for reappraisement are limited to the merchandise hereinbefore described and are abandoned as to all other merchandise; and that said appeals may be deemed to be submitted for decision upon this stipulation.

On tbe agreed facts, I find and bold export value, as that value is defined in section 402(d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be tbe proper basis for tbe determination of tbe value of tbe merchandise here involved, and that such value for tbe merchandise covered by the appeals herein is as follows: tbe merchandise covered by tbe invoices of Oriental Blind Co., Ltd., are properly dutiable at tbe appraised unit values, plus bale and packing charge, as invoiced; and the merchandise covered by tbe invoices of Daimaru Kogyo Kaisha, Ltd., are properly dutiable at tbe appraised unit values, packed. Said unit values include tbe cost of the sets of hardware accessories, which cost is 3 cents (U.S. currency) per set of hardware accessories.

These appeals having been abandoned insofar as they relate to all other merchandise, to that extent, the appeals are dismissed.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 533 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 533

  Commemorating the 60th anniversary of the permanent integration of 
             professional football by 4 pioneering players.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 17, 2006

 Mr. Voinovich (for himself, Mr. DeWine, and Mr. Allen) submitted the 
        following resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Commemorating the 60th anniversary of the permanent integration of 
             professional football by 4 pioneering players.

Whereas the integration of sports supported other ongoing efforts to permanently 
        end racial segregation as an accepted practice in the United States;
Whereas, in 1946, 4 African-American football players, William ``Bill'' K. 
        Willis and Marion Motley, who played for the Cleveland Browns, and Kenny 
        Washington and Woody Strode, who played for the Los Angeles Rams, all 
        signed contracts to play professional football;
Whereas, on August 7, 1946, Bill Willis was the first of this pioneering 
        foursome to sign a contract to play professional football for the 
        Cleveland Browns forever ending the race barrier in professional 
        football, 1 full year before Jackie Robinson broke the race barrier in 
        professional baseball;
Whereas, thanks to the significant contributions of Bill Willis and Marion 
        Motley, the Cleveland Browns won the National Football League (NFL) 
        Championship in 1950 which was the first year the Cleveland Browns 
        played in the NFL;
Whereas, in addition to permanently ending the race barrier in professional 
        football, Bill Willis and Marion Motley were recognized for their 
        outstanding professional football careers by their election to the Pro 
        Football Hall of Fame; and
Whereas 2006 marks the 60th anniversary of the permanent integration of 
        professional football, and the NFL will commemorate this milestone 
        during the 2006 Pro Football Hall of Fame Game: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) recognizes the 60th anniversary of the permanent 
        integration of professional football; and
            (2) respectfully requests the Secretary of the Senate to 
        transmit for appropriate display an enrolled copy of this 
        resolution to--
                    (A) the Pro Football Hall of Fame in Canton, Ohio; 
                and
                    (B) William K. Willis, the only surviving member of 
                the pioneering foursome who permanently ended the race 
                barrier in professional football.
                                 <all>
```
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v. JESSE L. SPEIGHT, Private E-2, U. S. Army, Appellant

5 USCMA 668, 18 CMR 292

No. 6129

Decided April 15, 1955

Lt Col Edward Duvall, U. S. Army, Capt Albert C. Malone, Jr., U. S. Army, and 1st Lt Anthony R. De Santo, U. S. Army, for Appellant.

Lt Col Thomas J. Newton, U. S. Army, and 1st Lt Benjamin C. Flannagan, U. S. Army, for Appellee.

Opinion of the Court

Robert E. Quinn, Chief Judge:

After arrest at a Japanese hotel, the accused was taken to the Camp Kobe Criminal Investigation office. There he was informed that he was suspected of using narcotics. Article 31 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, 50 USC § 602, was read to him, and he was asked to furnish a sample of his urine. He refused. A Criminal Investigation Division agent told him, “If you will not submit willingly, I will take you to the medical dispensary where the medical officer will catheterize you and I will have a sample of your urine at that time.”

*669The accused was then brought to the dispensary and a catheter was applied. The doctor in attendance testified that the accused told him that he was unable to provide a sample of his urine because of a urethral tenderness. The doctor also determined that the accused’s bladder was not extended, as it generally is when filled with urine. He was “almost sure” that the accused was physically unable to pass urine. The accused stated that he complied with the medical officer’s order to get on the table for the catheter procedure because he “figured ... if I didn’t . . . I would be disobeying an order of a superior officer.” A medical corpsman present at the time testified that “the order had to be given more than once.” The doctor personally made the catheter insertion. He admitted that “at one time it got very painful and he [the accused] rose up and I pushed him back and told him I wasn’t going to hurt him.” After about 15 to 20 minutes, the doctor left. The rest of the necessary procedure, which lasted in all “an hour — hour and a half,” was supervised by an enlisted medical corpsman. A urine sample obtained by catheterization of an accused, over his protest, is inadmissible in evidence. United States v. Jones, 5 USCMA 537, 18 CMR 161. Substantial evidence of active protest is present in this case. Consequently, the urine sample should not have been admitted at the trial.

The decision of the board of review is reversed. The findings of guilty and the sentence are set aside. Since there appears to be no available substitute for the inadmissible evidence, the charges are ordered dismissed.

Judge BROSMAN concurs.

LatimeR, Judge

(concurring in the result) :

I concur in the result.

A majority of the Court in United States v. Jones, 5 USCMA 537, 18 CMR 161, held that evidence obtained by catheterization was inadmissible if the accused merely informed military authorities he objected. For all practical purposes, that ended catheterization as a scientific method of crime detection and further dissents by me can serve no useful cause. In the light of that holding, this accused is entitled to have his conviction reversed.
**
Certification of the Principal Financial OfficerPursuant to 15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)(Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

I, Frederic F. Brace, the Executive Vice President and Chief FinancialOfficer of United Air Lines, Inc. (the "Company"), certify that:(1)     I have reviewed this quarterly reporton Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 of the Company; (2)     Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report; (3)     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,and other financial information included in this report, fairly presentin all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented inthis report; (4)     The Company's other certifying officer andI are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controlsand procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))for the Company and we have: (a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed underour supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this reportis being prepared; (b)     Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company'sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as ofthe end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;and (c)     Disclosed in this report any change in theCompany's internal control over financial reporting that occurred duringthe Company's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected,or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal controlover financial reporting; and(5)     The Company's other certifying officer andI have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the Company's auditors and the audit committeeof Company's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): (a)     All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Company'sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and (b)     Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the Company'sinternal control over financial reporting. /s/ Frederic F. BraceFrederic F. BraceUnited Air Lines, Inc.Executive Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerAugust 1, 2003  

**
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 84 (Wednesday, May 2, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24326-24327]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-8331]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Minerals Management Service


Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) Scientific Committee (SC); 
Announcement of Plenary Session

AGENCY: Minerals Management Service (MMS), Interior.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The OCS Scientific Committee will meet at the Hilton New 
Orleans/St. Charles Avenue in New Orleans, Louisiana.

DATES: Tuesday, May 22, 2007, from 8 a.m. to 5:30 p.m.; Wednesday, May 
23, 2007, from 8 a.m. to 5:30 p.m.; and Thursday, May 24, 2007, 8:30 
a.m. to 12:30 p.m.

ADDRESS: Hilton New Orleans/St. Charles Avenue, 333 St. Charles Avenue, 
New Orleans, Louisiana 70130, telephone (504) 524-8890.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A copy of the agenda may be requested 
from MMS by calling Ms. Carolyn Beamer at (703) 787-1211. Other 
inquiries concerning the OCS SC meeting should be addressed to Dr. 
James Kendall, Executive Secretary to the OCS SC, Minerals Management 
Service, 381 Elden Street, Mail Stop 4043, Herndon, Virginia 20170-4817 
or by calling (703) 787-1656.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The OCS SC will provide advice on the 
feasibility, appropriateness, and scientific value of the OCS 
Environmental Studies Program to the Secretary of the Interior through 
the Director of the MMS. The SC will review the relevance of the 
research and data being produced to meet MMS scientific information 
needs for decisionmaking and may recommend changes in scope, direction, 
and emphasis.
    The Committee will meet in plenary session on Tuesday, May 22. The 
Deputy Associate Director will address the Committee on the general 
status of the MMS and its activities. There will be an update on OCS 
activities in the Gulf of Mexico OCS Region and briefings on MMS' 
Alternate Energy Program and the Louisiana State University Coastal 
Marine Institute program.
    On Wednesday, May 23, the Committee will meet in discipline 
breakout sessions (i.e., biology/ecology, physical sciences, and social 
sciences) to review the specific research plans of the MMS regional 
offices for Fiscal Years 2007 and 2008.
    On Thursday, May 24, the Committee will meet in plenary session for 
reports

[[Page 24327]]

of the individual discipline breakout sessions of the previous day and 
to continue with Committee business.
    The meetings are open to the public. Approximately 30 visitors can 
be accommodated on a first-come-first-served basis at the plenary 
session.

    Authority: Federal Advisory Committee Act, P.L. 92-463, 5 
U.S.C., Appendix I, and the Office of Management and Budget's 
Circular A-63, Revised.

    Dated: April 26, 2007.
Chris C. Oynes,
Associate Director for Offshore Minerals Management.
 [FR Doc. E7-8331 Filed 5-1-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-MR-P
Exhibit 13.2

Certification by the Chief Financial Officer  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Bona Film Group Limited (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the year ended
December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Liang Xu, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1)   The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:
April 30, 2012

By:

/s/ Liang XuName:

Liang XuTitle:

Chief Financial Officer


---



QuickLinks
# C_2018005EN.01003101.xml

| 8.1.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 5/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.1.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 5/31

---

Judgment of the General Court of 10 November 2017 — Jema Energy v Joint Undertaking Fusion for Energy

(Case T-668/15) (1)

1

((Public supply contracts - Call for tenders - Supply of the Acceleration Grid Power Supply Conversion System - Rejection of a submitted tender - Transparency - Legal certainty - Equal treatment - Proportionality))

(2018/C 005/40)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Jema Energy, SA (Lasarte-Oria, Spain) (represented by: N. Rey Rey, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Joint Undertaking for ITER and the Development of Fusion Energy (represented by: R. Hanak, G. Poszler and S. Bernal Blanco, acting as Agents, and by P. Wytinck and B. Hoorelbeke, lawyers)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application based on Article 263 TFEU and seeking, inter alia, annulment of the decision of the European Joint Undertaking for ITER and the Development of Fusion Energy of 21 September 2015, taken in the context of the tendering procedure F4E-OPE-278, rejecting the applicant’s tender for Lot No 1 concerning the Acceleration Grid Power Supply Conversion System (AGPS-CS).

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Jema Energy, SA to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Jema Energy, SA to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 27, 25.1.2016.

1

---
No. 53757.

protests 45947-K, etc. (Boston).

#### American Express Co. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
PROGRESSIVE TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION
601 Cleveland Street, Suite 930
Clearwater, FL  33755



							February 16, 2000


Early, Lennon, Peters & Crocker, P.C.
900 Comerica Building
Kalamazoo, MI  49007-4752

Gentlemen:

	As compensation for legal consulting services rendered by you in the
amount of $10,034.46, we confirm our agreement to issue to you an aggregate of
4,014 shares of Progressive Telecommunications Corporation (the "Company")
common stock, $.001 par value, as follows:

	Early, Lennon, Peters & Crocker, P.C.
	Tax ID #38-3023506

These shares will be issued upon the effective date of a Form S-8 Registration
Statement and the delivery of the documents to you which constitute the S-8
Prospectus, which the Company agrees to complete with by February 22, 2000, free
and clear of any restrictions on sale by you..  We also confirm that the board
of directors of the Company have duly approved the issuance of shares to you.
Please confirm that this correctly sets forth our understanding relating to the
settlement of  compensation due to you for these services by signing the extra
copy of this letter and returning it to us.

					      PROGRESSIVE TELECOMMUNICATIONS
					      CORPORATION


					      BY: /s/ Barry L. Shevlin
      						   Barry L. Shevlin,
						         Chairman and CEO

Accepted:


/s/ Pat Crocker
Pat Crocker, Partner