alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|  |
|--|
|  | Message from                                                                                                                                                                        Donna E. Shalala

Foreword

Preface

Acknowledgments

Table of Contents

Chapter 1                                                                                                                                                        Introduction

Chapter 2                                                                                                                                                        The Magnitude of Youth Violence

Chapter 3                                                                                                                                                        The Developmental Dynamics of Youth Violence

Chapter 4                                                                                                                                                        Risk Factors for Youth Violence

Chapter 5                                                                                                                                                        Prevention and Intervention

Chapter 6                                                                                                                                                        A Vision for the Future

Glossary

Index

List of Tables and Figures

Executive Summary | Order                    These publications are available for ordering from the U.S.                    Government Printing Office at:                    - Call (202) 512-1800                       http://bookstore.gpo.govFax 
order                        form
 to (202) 512-2250                      
- Mail  order                        form  to                           Superintendent of Documents                          PO Box 371954                          Pittsburgh, PA 15250-7954                       Stock Number: 017-023-00206-6  Estimated delivery date 3/26/01  Cost to be determined   Order Free                    Resources    ****Back to Top |
May 11, 1971

No. 71-22

#### William E. Higdon, MSG, U. S. Army v United States and Honorable Kenneth A. Howard, LT COL, JAGC, Military Judge, 5th Judicial Circuit, Judicial Area III, U. S. Army.

*682ORDERED:

That said Petition be, and the same is hereby, dismissed.
No. 56637.

protests 168034-K, etc. (New York).

#### Gimbel Bros., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items of the merchandise consist of beaded bags the same in all material respects as those the classification of which was involved in Abstract 56124, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
IIA 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. J. RES. 29 

Providing for the reappointment of Alan G. Spoon as a citizen regent of 

the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 13, 2006 

Mr. COCHRAN (for himself, Mr. FRIST, and Mr. LEAHY) introduced the following joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for the reappointment of Alan G. Spoon as a 

citizen regent of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That, in accordance with section 5581 of the Revised Stat4 utes (20 U.S.C. 43), the vacancy on the Board of Regents 

5 of the Smithsonian Institution, in the class other than 

6 Members of Congress, occurring by reason of the expira7 tion of the term of Alan G. Spoon of Massachusetts, is 

8 filled by reappointment of the incumbent for a term of 
2 

•SJ 29 IS

1 6 years. The reappointment shall take effect on the date 

2 of enactment of this joint resolution. 

Æ
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

**In the Matter of**

**ERIC IAN SCHWARTZ**

**PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT**
**FROM ADMINISTRATIVE SUSPENSION :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 4 DB 2016 (No. 16 RST 2016)** 

**Attorney Registration No. 76810** 

**(Chester County)**

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 26 th**  **day of February, 2016, the Report and Recommendatio n of** 

**Disciplinary Board Member dated February 11, 2016, is a pproved and it is ORDERED** 

**that Eric Ian Schwartz, who has been on Administrative Suspension, has never been** 

**suspended or disbarred, and has demonstrated that he ha s the moral qualifications,** 

**competency and learning in law required for admission t o practice in the** 

**Commonwealth, shall be and is, hereby reinstated to act ive status as a member of the** 

**Bar of this Commonwealth. The expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation** 

**and processing of this matter shall be paid by the Petit ioner.** 

**Justice Eakin did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.**
# Official Journal L 66/2009

| | ISSN 1725-2555 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 66 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5211 March 2009 |

ISSN 1725-2555

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 66

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5211 March 2009

---

| Contents | | I   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | | Commission Regulation (EC) No 187/2009 of 10 March 2009 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables | 1 |

Contents

I   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is obligatory

page

REGULATIONS

Commission Regulation (EC) No 187/2009 of 10 March 2009 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

| | | II   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is not obligatory |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | | Commission |
| | | 2009/179/EC |
| | * | Commission Decision of 21 October 2008 on the State aid C 9/07 (ex N 608/06) which Spain intends to grant to Industria de Turbo Propulsores
  (notified under document number C(2008) 6011)

   (1) | 3 |

II   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is not obligatory

DECISIONS

Commission

2009/179/EC

*

Commission Decision of 21 October 2008 on the State aid C 9/07 (ex N 608/06) which Spain intends to grant to Industria de Turbo Propulsores
  (notified under document number C(2008) 6011)

   (1)

(notified under document number C(2008) 6011)

3

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

      ( print page 20921)    
The Department of the Treasury has submitted the following public information collection requirement(s) to OMB for review and clearance under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13. Copies of the submission(s) may be obtained by calling the Treasury Bureau Clearance Officer listed. Comments regarding this information collection should be addressed to the OMB reviewer listed and to the Treasury Department Clearance Officer, Department of the Treasury, Room 11000, 1750 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20220. 

*Dates:*                     Written comments should be received on or before May 29, 2007 to be assured of consideration.                 

## Community Development Financial Institutions Fund (CDFI) 

*OMB Number:*                     1559-0027.                 

*Type of Review:*                     Revision.                 

*Form:*                     CDFI 0007.                 

*Title:*                     CDFI Program and NMTC Program Annual Report including CIIS.                 

*Description:*                     This data collection is be used to collect compliance and performance data from certified CDFIs and CDEs and from NACD awardees. This data collection replaces the Annual Survey and parts of the Annual Report (OMB # 1559-0006).                 

*Respondents:*                     Business and other for-profit institutions.                 

*Estimated Total Burden Hours:*                     14,186 hours.                 

*Clearance Officer:*                     Ashanti McCallum, Community Development Financial Institutions Fund, Department of the Treasury, 601 13th Street, NW., Suite 200 South, Washington, DC 20005, (202) 622-9018.                 

*OMB Reviewer:*                     Alexander T. Hunt, Office of Management and Budget, Room 10235, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503, (202) 395-7316.                 

Robert Dahl, 

Treasury PRA Clearance Officer.

[FR Doc. E7-8013 Filed 4-25-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4810-70-P
Case: 2:12-cv-01079-EAS-EPD Doc #: 71 Filed: 11/20/13 Page: 1 of 6  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-01079-EAS-EPD Doc #: 71 Filed: 11/20/13 Page: 2 of 6  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-01079-EAS-EPD Doc #: 71 Filed: 11/20/13 Page: 3 of 6  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-01079-EAS-EPD Doc #: 71 Filed: 11/20/13 Page: 4 of 6  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-01079-EAS-EPD Doc #: 71 Filed: 11/20/13 Page: 5 of 6  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-01079-EAS-EPD Doc #: 71 Filed: 11/20/13 Page: 6 of 6  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-08T10:08:05-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 121 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.Con.Res.121
                                                  Agreed to May 15, 2007

                       One Hundred Tenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday,
            the fourth day of January, two thousand and seven

                          Concurrent Resolution

Whereas school music programs enhance intellectual development and 
  enrich the academic environment for students of all ages;

Whereas students who participate in school music programs are less 
  likely to be involved with drugs, gangs, or alcohol and have better 
  attendance in school;

Whereas the skills gained through sequential music instruction, 
  including discipline and the ability to analyze, solve problems, 
  communicate, and work cooperatively, are vital for success in the 
  21st century workplace;

Whereas the majority of students attending public schools in inner city 
  neighborhoods have virtually no access to music education, which 
  places them at a disadvantage compared to their peers in other 
  communities;

Whereas the arts are a core academic subject, and music is an essential 
  element of the arts; and

Whereas every student in the United States should have an opportunity 
  to reap the benefits of music education: Now, therefore, be it

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),  
That it is the sense of the Congress that music education grounded in 
rigorous instruction is an important component of a well-rounded 
academic curriculum and should be available to every student in every 
school.
Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.
```
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 124 (Thursday, June 27, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 38696]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-15400]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Basic Energy Sciences Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Department of Energy, Office of Science.

ACTION: Notice of Open Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces a meeting of the Basic Energy Sciences 
Advisory Committee (BESAC). The Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 
92-463, 86 Stat. 770) requires that public notice of these meetings be 
announced in the Federal Register.

DATES: Thursday, July 25, 2013, 8:30 a.m.-5:00 p.m.; and Friday, July 
26, 2013, 9:00 a.m. to 12:00 noon.

ADDRESSES: Bethesda North Hotel and Conference Center; 5701 Marinelli 
Road, Bethesda, Maryland 20852.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Katie Perine; Office of Basic Energy 
Sciences; U.S. Department of Energy; Germantown Building, 1000 
Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20585; Telephone: (301) 903-
6529.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Purpose of the Meeting: The purpose of this meeting is to provide 
advice and guidance with respect to the basic energy sciences research 
program.
    Tentative Agenda: Agenda will include discussions of the following:

[ssquf] News from Office of Science/DOE
[ssquf] News from the Office of Basic Energy Sciences
[ssquf] Report out from the Committee of Visitors for the Scientific 
User Facilities Division
[ssquf] Report out from the Committee of Visitors for the EFRC/JCAP 
Review.

    Public Participation: The meeting is open to the public. If you 
would like to file a written statement with the Committee, you may do 
so either before or after the meeting. If you would like to make oral 
statements regarding any of the items on the agenda, you should contact 
Katie Perine at 301-903-6594 (fax) or katie.perine@science.doe.gov 
(email). Reasonable provision will be made to include the scheduled 
oral statements on the agenda. The Chairperson of the Committee will 
conduct the meeting to facilitate the orderly conduct of business. 
Public comment will follow the 10-minute rule.
    Minutes: The minutes of this meeting will be available for public 
review and copying within sixty days at the following Web site: http://science.energy.gov/bes/besac/.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on June 21, 2013.
LaTanya R. Butler,
Deputy Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2013-15400 Filed 6-26-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
```
No. 50659.

#### Protests 69320-K, etc., of R. Maes Export & Import Corp. (New York).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as that passed upon in *Stephen Rug Mills*v. *United States*(32 C. C. P. A. 110, C. A. D. 293), and by the court’s decision on remand in Abstract 50056. In accordance therewith the protests were sustained as claimed.
The **Marine Geology Data** map viewer has recently moved.  It is now hosted at https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/maps/marine_geology/.

Any references or bookmarks will need to be updated.  We apologize for any inconvenience.

You should be automatically redirected in 7 seconds.
# C_2016270EN.01004102.xml

| 25.7.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 270/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.7.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 270/41

---

Judgment of the General Court of 14 June 2016 — Loops v EUIPO (Shape of a toothbrush)

(Case T-385/15) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - International registration designating the European Union - Three-dimensional mark - Shape of a toothbrush - Absolute ground for refusal - Lack of distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2016/C 270/46)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Loops, LLC (Dover, Delaware, United States) (represented by: T. Schmidpeter, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: W. Schramek and A. Schifko, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 30 April 2015 (Case R 1917/2014-2), concerning an application for registration of a three-dimensional sign consisting of the shape of a toothbrush as an EU trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Loops, LLC, to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Loops, LLC, to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 302, 14.9.2015.

1

---
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-18-00571-CR

Jose Juan GARCIA,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 399th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017CR12538

Honorable Frank J. Castro, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Delivered and Filed: October 17, 2018

DISMISSED

Pursuant to a plea-bargain agreement, Jose Juan Garcia pled guilty to sexual assault of a 

child and was sentenced to ten years in prison in accordance with the terms of his plea-bargain 

agreement. On July 11, 2018, the trial court signed a certification of defendant’s right to appeal 

stating that this “is a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” See TEX. R.

APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). After Garcia filed a notice of appeal, the trial court clerk sent copies of the 

certification and notice of appeal to this court. See id. 25.2(e). The clerk’s record, which includes 

the trial court’s Rule 25.2(a)(2) certification, has been filed. See id. 25.2(d). 
04-18-00571-CR

- 2 -

“In a plea bargain case . . . a defendant may appeal only: (A) those matters that were raised 

by written motion filed and ruled on before trial, or (B) after getting the trial court’s permission to 

appeal.” Id. 25.2(a)(2). The clerk’s record, which contains a written plea bargain, establishes the 

punishment assessed by the court does not exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor 

and agreed to by the defendant. See id. The clerk’s record does not include a written motion filed 

and ruled upon before trial; nor does it indicate that the trial court gave Garcia permission to appeal. 

See id. The trial court’s certification, therefore, appears to accurately reflect that this is a pleabargain case and that Garcia does not have a right to appeal. We must dismiss an appeal “if a 

certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record.” 

Id. 25.2(d). 

We, therefore, informed Garcia that this appeal would be dismissed pursuant to Texas Rule 

of Appellate Procedure 25.2(d), unless an amended trial court certification showing that Garcia

had the right to appeal was made part of the appellate record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d), 37.1; 

Daniels v. State, 110 S.W.3d 174 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2003, order). No such amended trial 

court certification has been filed. Therefore, this appeal is dismissed pursuant to Rule 25.2(d). 

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **CMBS Department**

 

MAC N9401-011

1055 10th Avenue SE

Minneapolis, MN 55414 |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc. 

1585 BROADWAY

NEW YORK, New York 10036-8200

 

RE: Annual Statement ofCompliance for Morgan Stanley Bank of America Merrill Lynch Trust 2016-C29,Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2016-C29

 

Per the Pooling and ServicingAgreement dated as of May 1, 2016 (the “Agreement”), the undersigned,a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Custodian (“WellsFargo”), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year endingDecember 31, 2016 (the “Reporting Period”):

 

(a) A review of WellsFargo’s activities during the Reporting Period and of its performanceunder the Agreement has been made under such officer’s supervision; and

 

(b) To the best of suchofficer’s knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled allof its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

 

February 27, 2017

 

/s/ Gail Vannest

GAIL VANNEST

Vice President

 

 

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

EASTERN DIVISION 

Lloyd B. Williams, 

Petitioner, 

v. 

Warden North Central Correctional 

Institution, 

Respondent. 

ORDER 

Case No. 2:13-cv-24 

Judge Michael H. Watson 

On January 28, 2014, United States Magistrate Judge Deavers, to whom 

this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1 )(B) and General Order 

95-2 for the Southern District of Ohio Eastern Division of Columbus, filed a 

Report and Recommendation ("R&R") concerning the disposition of Lloyd B. 

Williams' ("Petitioner") petition in this habeas corpus case. The R&R 

recommended granting Respondent's motion to dismiss. R&R, ECF No. 12. 

The R&R notified the parties of their right to file objections to the R&R. 

The R&R further specifically advised the parties that the failure to object to the 

R&R within fourteen days would result in a waiver of the right to de novo review 

by the District Judge and the right to appeal the decision of the District Judge 

adopting the R&R. R&R 15, ECF No. 12. The deadline for filing such objections 

has passed, and no objections were filed. 

Case: 2:13-cv-00024-MHW-EPD Doc #: 14 Filed: 02/27/14 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Having received no objections, the R&R is ADOPTED. The Court 

DISMISSES Petitioner's petition. The Clerk shall enter final judgment for 

Respondent and terminate the case. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Ml HAEL H. WATSON, JUDGE 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

Case: 2:13-cv-00024-MHW-EPD Doc #: 14 Filed: 02/27/14 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>