alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 175 

Expressing the sense of Congress that courts with fiduciary responsibility 

for a child of a deceased member of the Armed Forces who receives 

a death gratuity payment under section 1477 of title 10, United States 

Code, should take into consideration the expression of clear intent of 

the member regarding the distribution of funds on behalf of the child. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 26, 2007 

Mr. LATHAM (for himself, Mr. BOSWELL, Mr. KING of Iowa, Mr. BRALEY of 

Iowa, and Mr. LOEBSACK) submitted the following concurrent resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of Congress that courts with fiduciary 

responsibility for a child of a deceased member of the 

Armed Forces who receives a death gratuity payment 

under section 1477 of title 10, United States Code, 

should take into consideration the expression of clear 

intent of the member regarding the distribution of funds 

on behalf of the child. 

Whereas the death gratuity payable under section 1477 of 

title 10, United States Code, upon the death of a member 

of the Armed Forces, is intended to provide funds to 

meet the immediate needs of the survivors of the deceased member; 


ccoleman on PRODPC75 with BILLS
2 

•HCON 175 IH 

Whereas such section designates the surviving spouse and 

any children of a deceased member as the highest and 

second highest priority, respectively, to receive the death 

gratuity payment; and 

Whereas a member with a child or children, but no spouse, 

usually designates another individual to be responsible for 

that child or children and may express a desire that such 

individual receive the death gratuity payment on behalf 

of the child or children: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that courts 

3 with fiduciary responsibility for a child of a deceased mem4 ber of the Armed Forces who receives a death gratuity 

5 payment under section 1477 of title 10, United States 

6 Code, should take into consideration the expression of 

7 clear intent of the member regarding the distribution of 

8 funds on behalf of the child. 

Æ 


ccoleman on PRODPC75 with BILLS
# C_2017195EN.01002001.xml

| 19.6.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 195/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.6.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 195/20

---

Judgment of the General Court of 4 May 2017 — JYSK v Commission

(Case T-403/15) (1)

1

((Action for annulment - ERDF - Article 41(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 - Refusal to grant a financial contribution to a major project - Undertaking responsible for project implementation - Lack of direct concern - Inadmissibility))

(2017/C 195/26)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: JYSK sp. z o.o. (Radomsko, Poland) (represented by: H. Sønderby Christensen, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented initially by R. Lyal, B.-R. Killmann and M. Clausen, and subsequently by R. Lyal and B.-R. Killmann, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application based on Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of Commission Decision C(2015) 3228 of 11 May 2015, refusing to make a financial contribution from the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) to the major project ‘European Shared Services Centre — Intelligent Logistics Systems’ forming part of the operational programme ‘Innovative Economy’ drawn up by the Republic of Poland for the 2007-2013 programming period.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action as inadmissible; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action as inadmissible;

| 2. | Orders JYSK sp. z o.o. to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders JYSK sp. z o.o. to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 311, 21.9.2015.

1

---
No. 56651.

protests 161426-K, etc. (New York).

#### Albert Bonnier Publishing House and Milton Snedeker Corp. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that thu merchandise consists of wooden animal figures similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 55996, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                              TWL CORPORATION

             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
               SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Trinity Learning
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September
30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, Patrick R Quinn, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
          or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
          and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of
          operations of the Company.


Date: November 20, 2006            /S/ Patrick R Quinn
                                   ------------------------------------
                                   Patrick R Quinn
                                   Chief Financial Officer





     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906
     has been provided to TWL Corporation and will be retained by it and
     furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
     request.
```

[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 77 (Monday, April 23, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 20050]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-7686]

[[Page 20050]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 100

[COTP San Francisco Bay 07-008]
RIN 1625-AA08

Special Local Regulations for Marine Events; Blessing of the 
Fleet, Corinthian Yacht Club, San Francisco Bay, CA

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of enforcement of regulation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard will enforce the special local regulations 
(SLR) for the annual ``Blessing of the Pleasure Craft Fleet'' sponsored 
by the Corinthian Yacht Club in the navigable waters of San Francisco 
Bay on April 29, 2007. This action is necessary to control vessel 
traffic and to ensure the safety of event participants and spectators 
during the formation and transit of vessels involved in the ceremonies. 
During the enforcement period spectator vessels may not anchor, block, 
loiter, nor impede the through transit of participants or official 
patrol vessels within the area described during the event without 
permission from the Coast Guard Patrol Commander.

DATES: The regulations in 33 CFR 100.1103 will be enforced from 8 a.m. 
to 12 p.m. on April 29, 2007.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: ENS Sheral Richardson, Waterways 
Management Branch, U.S. Coast Guard Sector San Francisco, at (415) 556-
2950 extension 140.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Coast Guard will enforce the special 
local regulations for the Corinthian Yacht Club--Blessing of the Fleet 
in 33 CFR 100.1103 on April 29, 2007 from 8 a.m. to 12 p.m. in the 
waters of San Francisco Bay transiting the Raccoon Straits.
    The Coast Guard has granted the event sponsor a marine event permit 
for the waterfront festival. Under the provisions of 33 CFR 100.1103, 
spectator vessels may not anchor, block, loiter, nor impede the through 
transit of participants or official patrol vessels within the area 
described during the event without permission from the Coast Guard 
Patrol Commander. The Coast Guard may be assisted by other Federal, 
State, or local law enforcement agencies in enforcing the SLR.
    This notice is issued under authority of 33 CFR 100.1103 and 5 
U.S.C. 552(a). In addition to this notice in the Federal Register, the 
maritime community will be provided advance notification of these 
events via a Broadcast Notice to Mariners. If the Captain of the Port 
determines that the regulated area need not be enforced for the full 
duration stated in this notice, he may use a Broadcast Notice to 
Mariners to grant general permission to enter the regulated area.

    Dated: April 12, 2007.
W.J. Uberti,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, San Francisco.
[FR Doc. E7-7686 Filed 4-20-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P
```
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 242 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 242

Recognizing the two year anniversary of the earthquake that occurred in 
 northern Pakistan in 2005 and urging the United States to continue to 
 support rebuilding efforts in Pakistan in response to the conditions 
                       caused by that earthquake.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 25, 2007

   Mr. Al Green of Texas (for himself, Ms. Jackson-Lee of Texas, Mr. 
Payne, Mr. Burton of Indiana, Mr. Pascrell, Mr. McGovern, and Ms. Eddie 
     Bernice Johnson of Texas) submitted the following concurrent 
   resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Recognizing the two year anniversary of the earthquake that occurred in 
 northern Pakistan in 2005 and urging the United States to continue to 
 support rebuilding efforts in Pakistan in response to the conditions 
                       caused by that earthquake.

Whereas on October 8, 2005, a magnitude 7.6 earthquake struck northern Pakistan;
Whereas more than 73,000 people were killed as a result of the earthquake;
Whereas immediately following the earthquake, nearly 3,000,000 people were left 
        homeless and forced to live in tents or in the open air amid freezing 
        temperatures;
Whereas the earthquake damaged sanitation systems in the region, destroyed 
        hospitals, and left many people with no access to clean drinking water, 
        making them more vulnerable to disease;
Whereas the response of the United States to the earthquake was immediate and 
        massive: within 72 hours after the earthquake, the Disaster Assistance 
        Response Team (DART) of the United States Agency for International 
        Development had established a headquarters in Islamabad and forward 
        operating bases in Muzaffarabad and Mansehra in the North-West Frontier 
        Province of Pakistan to help coordinate disaster relief operations;
Whereas since the earthquake, the United States Government has provided 
        emergency shelter, relief supplies, and medical assistance in close 
        coordination with the Government of Pakistan, local authorities, and 
        international organizations;
Whereas 2 years after the earthquake, more than 6,000 people are still without 
        permanent shelter; and
Whereas within 48 hours after the earthquake, the first United States Army 
        helicopters arrived from Afghanistan to assist in disaster relief 
        operations: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That Congress urges the United States Government to continue to support 
rebuilding efforts in Pakistan in response to the conditions caused by 
the earthquake that occurred in northern Pakistan on October 8, 2005.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.2
------------

                              UNITED-GUARDIAN, INC.
                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of   United-Guardian,   Inc.  (the
"Registrant")  on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal  quarter  ended June 30,  2004,  as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  I, Kenneth H. Globus,  President and Chief Financial  Officer of the
Registrant,  hereby  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  section  1350,  as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) the Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


Date:  August 9, 2004                        /s/ Kenneth H. Globus
                                          --------------------------
                                          Kenneth H. Globus
                                          President and Chief Financial Officer
Mass Certification - MA-00071

Conn Certification - PH-0520

Mt.Tom Generating Co. LLC Analytical Laboratory

15 Agawam Avenue

West Springfield, MA 01089

Phone (413) 214-6541 Fax (413) 214-6842

email-madhu.shah@gdfsuezna.com

August 5, 2010

A. Douglass

Analysis of # 6 Oil

Enclosed are Report No(s): 23979..23981

Samples Analyzed

Customer

Sample Description

Laboratory Supervisor

Madhu Shah madhu.shah@gdfsuezna.com

eMail

Report Date

Thank you for your business

Madhu Shah, Laboratory Supervisor Date

West Springfield

Contact

ALL the information contained in this report has been reviewed for accuracy and checked against all quality control requirements

outlined in each applicable method.

This report may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval from Mt.Tom Generating Co.LLC Analytical Laboratory.

Mt.Tom Generating Co. LLC Analytical Laboratory Page 1 of 2
Sample Analysis Work Order 10-1179

Sb-Antimony Total 2.29 ppm 1.00 EPA 200.9 08/05/10 dfp

Parameter Results MDL Method Analyzed/Time

23979 # 6 Oil Bottom West Springfield 3/29/10 4/1/10

Sample Description Source Taken/Time Received

Tech

Sb-Antimony Total 2.32 ppm 1.00 EPA 200.9 08/05/10 dfp

Parameter Results MDL Method Analyzed/Time

23980 # 6 Oil Middle West Springfield 3/30/10 4/1/10

Sample Description Source Taken/Time Received

Tech

Sb-Antimony Total 2.14 ppm 1.00 EPA 200.9 08/05/10 dfp

Parameter Results MDL Method Analyzed/Time

23981 # 6 Oil Top West Springfield 3/30/10 4/1/10

Sample Description Source Taken/Time Received

Tech

Mt.Tom Generating Co. LLC Analytical Laboratory Page 2 of 2
110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 203 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Whereas Iran is a member of the International Labor Organization (ILO) and is legally bound to respect ILO core 

principles, including freedom of association; 

Whereas Iran, in violation of ILO principles, refuses to recognize independent labor unions; 

Whereas, on April 9, 2007, Iranian agents arrested and imprisoned Mahmoud Salehi, founder of the Saghez 
2 

•HCON 203 EH 

Bakery Workers Association, a labor union that is independent and therefore not recognized under Iranian law; 

Whereas Salehi’s life is in grave danger as he sits in the 

Sanandaj prisons without access to kidney dialysis treatment; 

Whereas, on July 10, 2007, plainclothes Iranian agents severely beat and arrested Mansour Osanloo, president of 

the Syndicate of Bus Drivers of the Tehran and Suburbs 

Bus Company, another labor union that is independent 

and therefore not recognized under Iranian law; 

Whereas this arrest was the third time in less than two years 

that Syndicate president Osanloo has been arrested by 

Iranian agents; 

Whereas Osanloo now sits in Iran’s notorious Evin prison 

with a chronic heart condition and a serious eye condition 

that requires immediate surgery; 

Whereas Osanloo has no access to medical or legal assistance 

and no contact with his family; and 

Whereas, on August 9, 2007, the International Transport 

Workers’ Federation, together with the International 

Trade Union Confederation, staged an international ‘‘day 

of action’’ to free Osanloo and Salehi: Now, therefore, be 

it 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That Congress— 

3 (1) condemns the Iranian regime for the arrest 

4 and imprisonment of Iranian union leaders 

5 Mahmoud Salehi and Mansour Osanloo and de6 mands their immediate release; 
3 

•HCON 203 EH 

1 (2) expresses its solidarity with the workers of 

2 Iran and stands with them, and with all Iranians, in 

3 their efforts to bring political freedom and individual 

4 liberty to Iran; and 

5 (3) calls on the Iranian regime to respect the 

6 right of Iranian workers to form independent asso7 ciations and unions, as required by its membership 

8 in the ILO. 

Passed the House of Representatives October 2, 

2007. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 203 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Condemning the persecution of labor rights 

advocates in Iran.
EX-31 Rule13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications.

 

 

I, Anthony Sfarra,certify that:

 

1. I have reviewedthis report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed inrespect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of the Wells FargoCommercial Mortgage Trust 2016-C33 (the "Exchange Act periodicreports");

 

2. Based on myknowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3. Based on myknowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required tobe provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is includedin the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4. Based on myknowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report underItem 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Actperiodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under theservicing agreements in all material respects; and

 

5. All of the reportson assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securitiesand their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance withservicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in thisreport in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except asotherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliancedescribed in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving thecertifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me bythe following unaffiliated parties:

 

National CooperativeBank, N.A., as NCB Master Servicer, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as SpecialServicer, National Cooperative Bank, N.A., as NCB Special Servicer, WilmingtonTrust, National Association, as Trustee, Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, asOperating Advisor, CoreLogic Commercial Real Estate Services, Inc., asServicing Function Participant, National Tax Search, LLC, as Servicing FunctionParticipant, Trimont Real Estate Advisors, LLC, as Special Servicer for the 225Liberty Street Mortgage Loan, Wilmington Trust, National Association, asTrustee for the 225 Liberty Street Mortgage Loan, Citibank, N.A., as Custodianfor the 225 Liberty Street Mortgage Loan, CoreLogic Commercial Real EstateServices, Inc., as Servicing Function Participant for the 225 Liberty StreetMortgage Loan, National Tax Search, LLC, as Servicing Function Participant forthe 225 Liberty Street Mortgage Loan, and U.S. Bank National Association, asServicing Function Participant for the 225 Liberty Street Mortgage Loan.

 

 

 

Dated: March 18, 2020

 

 

/s/ Anthony Sfarra

 

 

President

(seniorofficer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
No. 39015.

#### Protest 131252-G of Mills & Gibb Corp. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

From the record the handkerchiefs in question were found to be similar to those involved in *Pustet*v. *United States*(13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 530, T. D. 41396) and held dutiable at 75 percent under paragraph 1430. Articles in chief value of cellulose filaments similar to those involved in Abstract 37230 were held dutiable at 60 perdent under paragraph 31.
No. 50669.

#### Protests 95475-K, etc., of Rousos Bros. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

At the trial it was stipulated that the reliquidation of the entries herein involved is similar in all material respects to that in *Bel Paese Sales Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(15 Cust. Ct. 7, C. D. 932). In accordance with stipulation and following the decision cited, judgment was entered directing the collector to réliquidate the entries herein, refunding the duty established to have *320been taken in excess, in accordance with the decision and judgment in Abstract 45172.
(Reap. Dec. 8982)

Entry No. 6409, etc.

#### W. X. Huber Company et al. *v.*United States

(Decided September 5, 1957)

*Stein & Shostak*for the plaintiffs.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Chief Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule “A,” hereto attached and made a part hereof, relate to various classes of merchandise exported from France and entered at the port of Los Angeles.

The cases have been submitted for decision on a written stipulation wherein the parties agree that the issues involved herein are the same in all material respects as those which were the subject of the decision in *Bert Friedberg*& *Company*v. *United States,*36 Cust. Ct. 596, Reap. Dec. 8590, the record in which case was incorporated herein by consent. In that case, the court held foreign value, as defined in section 402 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for appraisement of the merchandise there under consideration, and that such statutory value did not include the so-called “French sole or unique tax.”

An agreed set of facts, included in the stipulation of submission, establishes that the proper basis for appraisement of the merchandise involved herein is statutory foreign value, and that such value for each of the items in question is the appraised value, “less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser^ in similar cases,” and I so hóld.

Judgment, will be rendered accordingly..