alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Development of Chemical Precipitation Purchased Equipment Costs:

Tanks

Purchased Equipment Costs are the sum of the following cost elements:

(1) Pump Costs

(2) Tank Costs

(3) Chemical Feed System Costs

(4) Mixer Costs

(5) Clarifier Costs

(6) Filter Press Costs

(7) Sand Filter Costs

Each cost component includes the cost of freight and associated ancillary equipment such as piping, valves, and 

controllers.

This telephone contact report supports EPA’s development of cost element (2) by documenting EPA's 

communication with a vendor regarding purchase costs and information for tanks used in the Steam Electric 

cost model.
Project No.: 0172.08.029.044 DISTRIBUTION

Page _1_ of __1_

Project Name: Steam/Cost/Compliance Modeling

TELEPHONE CALL RECORD

 Outgoing Call

Date: 06/22/2011 Time: 1:45 pm PDT

Company Name: Fisher Tank Company

 

Contact Name: Fred Ruinen

Phone No : (803)-359-4173 ext. 2713

Name: Kavya Kasturi ERG

GENERAL SUBJECT: Vendor cost request for carbon steel field-built tanks for a chemical precipitation wastewater treatment system.

TOPICS DISCUSSED AND ACTION TAKEN

On June 22, 2011 at 1:45 pm I contacted Mr. Fred Ruinen. I explained to Mr. Ruinen that we are working 

on conceptual level costing of a chemical precipitation wastewater treatment system to treat FGD (flue gas 

desulfurization) wastewater from steam electric power plants, and as a part of this project we are trying to 

collect cost information on different components or units of a chemical precipitation system.

I told Mr. Ruinen that we are interested in carbon steel tanks. I requested information such as purchase cost, 

cost for ancillary equipments and power consumption (if applicable). Mr. Ruinen stated that they provide only 

field-built tanks. The tank sizes range from 30,000 gal to 10,000,000 gal. The smallest tank is 15-16 feet in 

diameter. Tank height increases in 8 foot increments. A 1,000,000 gal tank would be 60 feet in diameter and 40 

feet tall. Typically, for wastewater treatment, tanks are 16-24 feet tall and have a larger diameter. Mr. Ruinen 

requested I email him our request and questions and he would follow up via email.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

  

In connection with this Annual Report of 3AM Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”), on Form 10-K for the quarter ended May 31, 2020, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Simon Gee, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief: 

  

(1)the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  

  

(2)the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

Date: September 14, 2020
# C_2017078EN.01002801.xml

| 13.3.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 78/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.3.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 78/28

---

Judgment of the General Court of 2 February 2017 — Marcas Costa Brava v EUIPO — Excellent Brands JMI (Cremcaffé by Julius Meinl)

(Case T-689/15) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative mark Cremcaffé by Julius Meinl - Earlier EU figurative mark café crem - Relative ground for refusal - Lack of genuine use of the earlier mark - Article 42(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2017/C 078/37)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Marcas Costa Brava, SL (Sils, Spain) (represented by: E. Manresa Medina and J. Manresa Medina, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Fischer, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Excellent Brands JMI Ltd (Baar, Switzerland) (represented by: D. Majer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 28 September 2015 (Case R 2491/2014-5), relating to opposition proceedings between Marcas Costa Brava and Excellent Brands JMI.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Marcas Costa Brava, SL, to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Marcas Costa Brava, SL, to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 48, 8.2.2016.

1

---
Exhibit 35.11



|     |                                            |                         
|---- | ------------------------------------------ | ------------------------
|LOGO |                                            | Corporate Trust Services
|     | MAC R1204-010                             
|     | 9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045
|     | Tel: 410 884 2000                         
|     | Fax: 410 715 2380                         

Citibank, National Association

388 Greenwich Street 14th floor

New York, NY 10013



|Re: | Annual Statement of Compliance for Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Securities, Inc., Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2015-P2
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Per the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of December 1, 2015 (the Agreement), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells
Fargo Bank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator (Wells Fargo), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2016 (the Reporting Period):

(a)    A review of Wells Fargos activities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under the Agreement has
been made under such officers supervision; and

(b)    To the best of such officers knowledge, based on
such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

February 27, 2017



|              
|--------------
|LOGO          
|BRIAN SMITH   
|Vice President



|                       |  |     
|---------------------- |  | ----
|Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |  | LOGO
# C_2017151EN.01000801.xml

| 15.5.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 151/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.5.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 151/8

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 15 March 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší správní soud — Czech Republic) — Policie ČR, Krajské ředitelství policie Ústeckého kraje, odbor cizinecké policie v Salah Al Chodor, Ajlin Al Chodor, Ajvar Al Chodor,

(Case C-528/15) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection - Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 (Dublin III) - Article 28(2) - Detention for the purpose of transfer - Article 2(n) - Significant risk of absconding - Objective criteria - Absence of a legal definition))

(2017/C 151/11)

Language of the case: Czech

Referring court

Referring court

Nejvyšší správní soud

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Policie ČR, Krajské ředitelství policie Ústeckého kraje, odbor cizinecké policie

Applicant:

Defendants: Salah Al Chodor, Ajlin Al Chodor, Ajvar Al Chodor

Defendants:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 2(n) and Article 28(2) of Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 establishing the criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection lodged in one of the Member States by a third-country national or a stateless person, read in conjunction, must be interpreted as requiring Member States to establish, in a binding provision of general application, objective criteria underlying the reasons for believing that an applicant for international protection who is subject to a transfer procedure may abscond. The absence of such a provision leads to the inapplicability of Article 28(2) of that regulation.

---

(1)  OJ C 16, 18.1.2016.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                             447
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   14,191
<ALLOWANCES>                                       280
<INVENTORY>                                     17,206
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                33,096
<PP&E>                                          23,705
<DEPRECIATION>                                  13,767
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  59,497
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,517
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,398
<OTHER-SE>                                      31,930
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    59,497
<SALES>                                         22,492
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                22,492
<CGS>                                           13,326
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   13,326
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,855
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    23
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 310
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,052
<INCOME-TAX>                                       810
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,210
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,210
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.44
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.44
        

</TABLE>
----

            DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE No 45/2005

of 29 April 2005         

amending Annex I (Veterinary and phytosanitary matters) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following indents shall be added in point 39 (Commission Decision 2001/881/EC) in Part 1.2 of Chapter I of Annex I to the Agreement:

Article 2

The texts of Decisions 2004/517/EC and 2004/608/EC in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 30 April 2005, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 29 April 2005.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Richard WRIGHT            

----

(1)OJ L 198, 28.7.2005, p. 45.

(2)OJ L 221, 22.6.2004, p. 18.

(3)OJ L 274, 24.8.2004, p. 15.

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

----
#### S. Stern Stiner & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States

No. 6432.

Entry No. 719028, etc.

Invoices dated London, England, November 9, 1943, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., December 27, 1943, etc.

(Decided October 9, 1946)

*Brooks & Brooks*for the plaintiffs.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Mollison, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importers on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
# C_2015127EN.01004402.xml

| 20.4.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 127/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.4.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 127/44

---

Action brought on 16 February 2015 — ZZ and Others v Council

(Case F-27/15)

(2015/C 127/63)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicants: ZZ and Others (represented by: S. Orlandi and T. Martin, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision fixing the rights of the applicants to reimbursement of annual travel expenses under Article 8 of Annex VII of the Staff Regulations, as amended by Regulation No 1023/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2013 amending the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union and the CEOS.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Declare illegal and inapplicable Article 8 of Annex VII of the Staff Regulations; |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare illegal and inapplicable Article 8 of Annex VII of the Staff Regulations;

| — | Annul the decision to cancel all reimbursement of the applicants’ annual travel expenses from 2014; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision to cancel all reimbursement of the applicants’ annual travel expenses from 2014;

| — | order the Council to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Council to pay the costs.

---
|  |
|--|
|  | Message from                                                                                                                                                                        Donna E. Shalala

Foreword

Preface

Acknowledgments

Table of Contents

Chapter 1                                                                                                                                                        Introduction

Chapter 2                                                                                                                                                        The Magnitude of Youth Violence

Chapter 3                                                                                                                                                        The Developmental Dynamics of Youth Violence

Chapter 4                                                                                                                                                        Risk Factors for Youth Violence

Chapter 5                                                                                                                                                        Prevention and Intervention

Chapter 6                                                                                                                                                        A Vision for the Future

Glossary

Index

List of Tables and Figures

Executive Summary | Resources
                                 
Search healthfinder�                  for information on:- Youth Violence
- Violence

                                                       
Search healthfinder�                      kids                    for information on:-  Violent and Abusive Behavior

                                    
Read Healthy                  People 2010, Chapter 15                    for information on:-  Injury                          and Violence Prevention

 

****Back to Top |
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration 

          - [TA-W-61,294] 

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on April 12, 2006 in response to a worker petition filed by a State agency representative on behalf of workers of Oberle & Associates, Inc. employed at Delphi, New Castle, Indiana. 

The petitioning group of workers is covered by an active certification (TA-W-60,819 as amended) which expires on February 13, 2009. Consequently, further investigation in this case would serve no purpose, and the investigation has been terminated. 

Signed at Washington, DC this 20th day of April, 2007. 

Richard Church, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

 [FR Doc. E7-7969 Filed 4-25-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
# C_2016136EN.01005002.xml

| 18.4.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 136/50 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.4.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 136/50

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 7 March 2016 — FJ v Parliament

(Case F-38/15) (1)

1

(2016/C 136/73)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 178, 1/6/2015, p. 26.

1

---
Exhibit 99.7





Rule 13a-14(b) Certification Chief Financial Officer





In connection with the annual report of Fortis Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Karl W. Smith, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





|   |                                                                                                                      
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

|   |                                                                                                                                                     
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




St. John’s, CanadaFebruary 16, 2017/s/ Karl W. SmithKarl W. SmithExecutive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
IIA 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 14

Providing for the recognition of Jerusalem as the undivided capital of Israel 

before the United States recognizes a Palestinian state, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 19, 2005

Mr. BROWNBACK (for himself, Mr. CRAPO, and Mr. SMITH) introduced the following joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations 

JOINT RESOLUTION

Providing for the recognition of Jerusalem as the undivided 

capital of Israel before the United States recognizes a 

Palestinian state, and for other purposes.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This joint resolution may be cited as the ‘‘Jerusalem 

5 Resolution’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

7 Congress makes the following findings: 

8 (1) Jerusalem has been the capital of the Jew9 ish people for 3,000 years. 
2

•SJ 14 IS 

1 (2) Jerusalem has never been the capital for 

2 any other state other than for the Jewish people. 

3 (3) Jerusalem is central to Judaism and is cited 

4 in the Tanach, the Hebrew Bible, 766 times. 

5 (4) Jerusalem is not mentioned by name in the 

6 Koran. 

7 (5) Every sovereign nation has the right to des8 ignate its own capital. 

9 (6) Jerusalem is the seat of the Government of 

10 Israel, including the President, the parliament, and 

11 the Supreme Court. 

12 (7) United States law states as a matter of 

13 United States policy that Jerusalem should be the 

14 undivided capital of Israel. 

15 (8) Israel is the only country in which the 

16 United States neither maintains an embassy in the 

17 city designated as the capital by the host country 

18 nor recognizes such city as the capital. 

19 (9) The citizens of Israel should be allowed to 

20 worship freely and according to their traditions. 

21 (10) Israel supports religious freedom for all 

22 faiths. 

23 (11) Relocating the United States Embassy in 

24 Israel from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem would express the 
3

•SJ 14 IS 

1 continued support of the United States for Israel 

2 and for an undivided Jerusalem. 

3 SEC. 3. LOCATION OF UNITED STATES EMBASSY IN ISRAEL. 

4 Not later than 180 days before recognizing a Pales5 tinian state, the United States shall move the United 

6 States Embassy in Israel from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem. 

7 SEC. 4. RECOGNITION OF ISRAEL AS UNDIVIDED CAPITAL 

8 OF ISRAEL. 

9 The United States shall not recognize a Palestinian 

10 state until the international community resolves the status 

11 of Jerusalem by recognizing the city as the undivided cap12 ital of Israel. 

13 SEC. 5. SENSE OF CONGRESS REGARDING FREEDOM OF 

14 WORSHIP. 

15 It is the sense of Congress that the citizens of Israel 

16 should be allowed, as a fundamental human right recog17 nized by the United States and United Nations General 

18 Assembly resolution 181 of November 29, 1947, to wor19 ship freely and according to their traditions.

Æ