alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NotesFAQContact Us

Collection

Thesaurus
AdvancedSearch Tips

Collection

Thesaurus
BrowseThesaurus

 Download full text

**ERIC Number:**

**Record Type:**

**Publication Date:**

**Pages:**

**Abstractor:**

**ISBN:**

**ISSN:**

**EISSN:**

Higher EducationSupply and DemandLiteratureCredentialsLaborLabor MarketAdult StudentsAdult LearningSurveysCommunity CollegesAdult Basic Education

**Publication Type:**

**Education Level:**

**Audience:**

**Language:**

**Sponsor:**

**Authoring Institution:**

**Grant or Contract Numbers:**

PrivacyCopyrightContact UsSelection PolicyAPI
JournalsNon-JournalsDownloadSubmitMultimediaWidget
No. 50671.

#### Protests 98220-K, etc., of Chicago Macaroni Co. of N. Y., Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

At the trial it was stipulated that the reliquidation of the entries herein involved is similar in all material respects to that in *Bel Paese Sales Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(15 Cust. Ct. 7, C. D. 932). In accordance with stipulation and following the decision cited, judgment was entered directing the collector to reliquidate the entries herein, refunding the duty established to have been taken in excess, in accordance with the decisión and judgment in Abstract 45184.
September 16, 1941

No. 46343.

#### Protest 985703-G of Vanillaproco, Inc.

C. D. 510. Motion of Government for rehearing denied.
# C_2017144EN.01006104.xml

| 8.5.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 144/61 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.5.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 144/61

---

Order of the General Court of 15 March 2017 — EFB v Commission

(Case T-151/15) (1)

1

(2017/C 144/89)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 190, 8.6.2015.

1

---
#### R. F. Downing & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States

No. 6430.

Entry No. 767635, etc.

Invoices dated London, England, May 5, 1941, etc.

Certified May 6, 1941, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., June 11, 1941, etc.

(Decided October 9, 1946)

*Strauss & Hedges (Eugene F. Blauvelt*of counsel) for the plaintiffs.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Mollison, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importers on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
# C_2016419EN.01004101.xml

| 14.11.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 419/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.11.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 419/41

---

Judgment of the General Court of 5 October 2016 — ECDC v CJ

(Case T-395/15) (1)

1

((Appeal - Civil service - Member of the contract staff - Fixed-term contract - Termination - Breakdown in the relationship of trust - Right to be heard))

(2016/C 419/53)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Appellant: European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (represented by: J. Mannheim and A. Daume, acting as Agents, and by D. Waelbroeck and A. Duron, lawyers)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: CJ (Agios Stefanos, Greece) (represented by: V. Kolias, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 29 April 2015, CJ v ECDC (F-159/12 and F-161/12, EU:F:2015:38), seeking to have that judgment set aside in part.

CJ

ECDC

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 311, 21.9.2015.

1

---
III 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 93 

Relative to the death of Howell T. Heflin, former United States Senator 

for the State of Alabama. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 4, 2005 

Mr. REID (for himself, Mr. FRIST, Mr. SHELBY, and Mr. SESSIONS) 

submitted the following resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION

Relative to the death of Howell T. Heflin, former United 

States Senator for the State of Alabama.

Whereas Howell Heflin served as a United States Marine 

from 1942–1946 and was awarded the Silver Star for 

bravery; 

Whereas Howell Heflin served as Chief Justice of the Alabama Supreme Court from 1971–1977; 

Whereas Howell Heflin served the people of Alabama with 

distinction for 18 years in the United States Senate; and 

Whereas Howell Heflin served the Senate as Chairman of the 

Select Committee on Ethics in the ninety-sixth and one 

hundredth to one hundred-second Congresses;

1 Resolved, That the Senate has heard with profound 

2 sorrow and deep regret the announcement of the death 
2

SRES 93 ATS

1 of the Honorable Howell T. Heflin, former member of the 

2 United States Senate. 

3 Resolved, That the Secretary of the Senate commu4 nicate these resolutions to the House of Representatives 

5 and transmit an enrolled copy thereof to the family of the 

6 deceased. 

7 Resolved, That when the Senate adjourns today, it 

8 stand adjourned as a further mark of respect to the mem9 ory of the Honorable Howell T. Heflin.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 175 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.Con.Res.175
                                                 Agreed to July 30, 2007

                       One Hundred Tenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday,
            the fourth day of January, two thousand and seven

                          Concurrent Resolution

Whereas the death gratuity payable under section 1477 of title 10, 
  United States Code, upon the death of a member of the Armed Forces, 
  is intended to provide funds to meet the immediate needs of the 
  survivors of the deceased member;

Whereas such section designates the surviving spouse and any children 
  of a deceased member as the highest and second highest priority, 
  respectively, to receive the death gratuity payment; and

Whereas a member with a child or children, but no spouse, usually 
  designates another individual to be responsible for that child or 
  children and may express a desire that such individual receive the 
  death gratuity payment on behalf of the child or children: Now, 
  therefore, be it

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of Congress that courts with fiduciary 
responsibility for a child of a deceased member of the Armed Forces who 
receives a death gratuity payment under section 1477 of title 10, 
United States Code, should take into consideration the expression of 
clear intent of the member regarding the distribution of funds on 
behalf of the child.
Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.
```
EXHIBIT 10.26.1

Revolving Loan Amendment No. 1

ThisREVOLVING LOAN AMENDMENT NO. 1(the "Amendment"), dated as of July 1, 2002, is entered into by and
betweenUnion Carbide Corporation, a New York corporation (the "Borrower") andThe Dow Chemical Company,
a Delaware corporation (the "Lender").

A.    The
Lender and the Borrower entered into a Revolving Loan Agreement dated as of February 6, 2001, (as amended, the "Loan Agreement"); and

B.    The
Lender and the Borrower now wish to further amend the Loan Agreement as follows:





IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Amendment to the Loan Agreement to be duly executed by their duly authorized representatives.

|BORROWER:                 |  | LENDER:                 
|------------------------- |  | ------------------------
|UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION |  | THE DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY
|By:                       |  |                         
|Name:                     |  |                         
|Title:                    |  |                         

48

---

QuickLinks
No. 48713.

#### Protests 887551-G, etc., of J. J. Brunner Agency, Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and the cited cases the following allowances were made by the court to compensate for the weight of the foreign substances on the outside of certain cheese: (1) 21⁄2 percent for cheese similar to that involved in *Scaramelli*v. *United States*(9 Cust. Ct. 270, C. D. 706) and Abstracts 42146 and 48269; and (2) 1 percent for cheese similar to the Reggiano cheese the subject of *Scaramelli*v. *United States, supra.*Protests sustained to this extent.
EXHIBIT 12(a)


                                    UNION ELECTRIC COMPANY
                     COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
<TABLE>

                                                                                                                12 Months
                                                                Year Ended December 31,                            Ended

                                                ---------------------------------------------------------         June 30,
                                                 1992         1993        1994           1995         1996         1997
                                                 ----         ----        ----           ----         ----         ----
                                                             (Thousands of Dollars Except Ratios)

<S>                                         <C>          <C>          <C>            <C>          <C>           <C>
Net income for the Period                     $302,748     $297,160     $320,757       $314,107     $304,876      $302,061 
                                              --------     --------     --------       --------     --------      --------
   Add:
      Taxes Based on income                    197,009      182,716      203,827        207,734      196,210       192,968
                                               -------      -------      -------        -------      -------       -------
      Fixed Charges:
        Interest on Debt                       125,798      124,430      135,608        129,239      128,375       132,087 (*)
        Amortization of Premium and
           Discount, Less Expense on Debt;
           and Bond Defeasance Cost              9,521        5,170        5,504          5,502        4,269         3,662
        Rentals (See note)                         908        1,314        1,299          3,330        3,458         3,796
                                               -------      -------      -------        -------      -------       -------
           Total Fixed Charges                 136,227      130,914      142,411        138,071      136,102       139,545
                                               -------      -------      -------        -------      -------       -------

Earnings Available for Fixed Charges          $635,984     $610,790     $666,995       $659,912     $637,188      $634,574
                                              ========     ========     ========       ========     ========      ========

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges                4.66         4.66         4.68           4.78         4.68          4.54
                                                  ====         ====         ====           ====         ====          ====
</TABLE>




(*)   Total annual interest charges on all bonds for the twelve months ended
June 30, 1997 was $113,432,000.

Note: Represents the interest factor applicable to rentals.
#### Robert GUICHARD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MANDALAY PICTURES LLC, dba Mandalay Entertainment; et al., Defendants—Appellees, and The Motion Picture Association of America, Paramount Pictures Corporation; et al., Defendant.

No. 05-15565.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*819Submitted Sept. 12, 2005.*

Decided Sept. 13, 2005.

Robert Guichard, San Francisco, CA, Pro Se.

Jacques M. Rimokh, Esq., Loeb & Loeb, New York, NY, David A. Grossman, Esq., loeb *&*loeb, LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendants-Appellees,

Before: REINHARDT, RYMER and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

This appeal from the denial of a motion for a preliminary injunction comes to us under Ninth Circuit Rule 3-3.

Applying the “limited and deferential” standard of review appropriate for preliminary injunction rulings, *Southwest Voter Registration Educ. Project v. Shelley,*344 F.3d 914, 918 (9th Cir.2003) (en banc), we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion or based its decision on an erroneous legal standard or clearly erroneous factual findings in denying preliminary injunctive relief. *See Playmakers LLC v. ESPN, Inc.,*376 F.3d 894, 896-97 (9th Cir.2004) (explaining standard of review).

The order denying the motion for a preliminary injunction is therefore AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 80 (Thursday, April 26, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 20874]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-7969]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-61,294]


Oberle & Associates, Inc. Employed At Delphi, New Castle, IN; 
Notice of Termination of Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated on April 12, 2006 in response to a worker 
petition filed by a State agency representative on behalf of workers of 
Oberle & Associates, Inc. employed at Delphi, New Castle, Indiana.
    The petitioning group of workers is covered by an active 
certification (TA-W-60,819 as amended) which expires on February 13, 
2009. Consequently, further investigation in this case would serve no 
purpose, and the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC this 20th day of April, 2007.
Richard Church,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
 [FR Doc. E7-7969 Filed 4-25-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
**Exhibit 99.8**

** **

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

We consent to the use in this Annual Report on Form 40-F (File No. 001-37915) of our report dated February 15, 2017, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Fortis Inc. (the “Company”) as at December 31, 2016 and 2015, and the consolidated statements of earnings, comprehensive income, cash flows and changes in equity for the years then ended, which report is included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2016.

 

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File No. 333-215777) and Form F-10 (File No. 333-214787) of our report dated February 15, 2017, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of the Company as at December 31, 2016 and 2015, and the consolidated statements of earnings, comprehensive income, cash flows and changes in equity for the years then ended, which report is included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form40-F for the year ended December 31, 2016.

 

 
| St.   John’s, Canada |                                      |
|---------------------------|--------------------------------------|
| February 28,   2017  | Chartered   Professional Accountants |

 

----
Each depositor insured to at least $250,000 per insured bank
 Advanced Search
 Home
				|
				Deposit Insurance
				|
				Consumer Protection
				|
				Industry Analysis
				|
				Regulations & Examinations
				|
				Asset Sales
				|
				News & Events
				|
				About FDIC
 Bank Find
							Are My Deposits Insured?
							Uninsured Investments
							The Deposit Insurance Fund
							International Deposit Insurance
 Consumer News & Information
							Loans & Mortgages
							Banking & Your Money
							Financial Education & Literacy
							Community Affairs
							Identity Theft & Fraud
							Consumer Financial Privacy
 Bank Data & Statistics
							Research & Analysis
							Failed Banks
 Bank Examinations
							Laws & Regulations
							Resources for Bank Officers & Directors
							FDIC*connect*
							Required Financial Reports
							Examiner Training Programs
 Loan Sales
							Real Estate Sales
							Financial Asset Sales
							Servicing Sales Announcements
							Other Asset Sales
							Historical Sales
 Press Releases
							Online Press Room
							Conferences & Events
							Financial Institution Letters
							Special Alerts
							Letters to the Editor/Opinion Editorials
							Speeches & Testimony
 Mission & Purpose
							Advisory Committees
							Careers with the FDIC
							Management Team
							Plans & Reports
							What We Can Do for You
							Diversity at the FDIC
 Home  > Deposit Insurance > The Deposit Insurance Funds > Proposed Assessment CalculatorFuture Assessment Calculator
		
		In August 2006, the FDIC began providing a spreadsheet calculator on our website. This calculator can be downloaded and used by bankers to estimate insurance assessment rates for future quarter(s). The calculator contains all public financial data.
    
    The calculators illustrates deposit insurance assessment rates effective April 1, 2011 under the Final Rule of Assessments, Dividends, Assessment Base, and Large Bank Pricing - PDF
    
    **December 31, 2010 data are now included in the calculators**
    
	
	
    Click here to download the **Future Assessment Rate Calculator for Large Institutions** (Updated February 23, 2011) (Excel Help)Click here to download the **Future Assessment Rate Calculator for Highly Complex Institutions** (Updated February 23, 2011)    (Excel Help)Click here to download the **Future Assessment Rate Calculator for Small Institutions** (Updated February 23, 2011)  (Excel Help)Last Updated 02/28/2011
[email protected]
 Home
				|
				Contact Us
				|
				Search
				|
				Help
				|
				SiteMap
				|
				Forms
                	|
				En Español
 Website Policies
				|
				Privacy Policy
				|
				USA.gov
				|
				FDIC Office of Inspector General
 Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Service Center
				|
				FDIC Open Government Webpage	|
                	No  FEAR Act Data
# C_2016007EN.01003601.xml

| 11.1.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 7/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.1.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 7/36

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (2nd Chamber) of 19 November 2015 — van der Spree v Commission

(Case F-37/15) (1)

1

((Civil service - Remuneration - Termination of service - Article 6(1) of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations - Resettlement allowance at the base rate of two months’ basic salary - Applicant’s change of residence - Residence of the applicant’s daughter - Proof))

(2016/C 007/47)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Daniel van der Spree (Eischoll, Switzerland) (represented by: C. Mourato, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and T.S. Bohr, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of the decision rejecting the applicant’s request to be paid double the resettlement allowance following his relocation to Switzerland.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Declares that Mr van der Spree is to bear his own costs and orders him to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Declares that Mr van der Spree is to bear his own costs and orders him to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 178, 1/6/2015, p. 26.

1

---
EXHIBIT
32.1








CERTIFICATION
UNDER SECTION 906


OF
THE


SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Unico American Corporation
(the "Company") for the period ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Erwin Cheldin, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge:





1.
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
  and





2.
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.











/s/  Erwin
Cheldin





Name:                               Erwin
Cheldin


Title:                        
        Chairman of the Board, President
and Chief Executive Officer


Date:                                August
13, 2008














A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to Unico American Corporation, and will be
retained by Unico American Corporation, and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.
 Date: December 8, 2009
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Rainer H. Bosselmann

Rainer H. BosselmannChairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer