alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2015311EN.01006202.xml

| 21.9.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 311/62 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.9.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 311/62

---

Order of the General Court of 26 June 2015 — Navitar v OHIM — Elukuva (NaviTar)

(Case T-93/15) (1)

1

(2015/C 311/72)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Fifth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 127, 20.4.2015.

1

---
No. 50622.

#### Protest 50923-K of Geo. S. Bush & Co., Inc. (Portland, Oreg.).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the court found that the facts herein agreed upon were such as to bring the case within the holding in *John Barr*v. *United States*(11 Cust. Ct. 88, C. D. 801), which record was incorporated herein. (See *John Barr*v. *United States,*324 U. S. 83, decided February 5, 1945.) In accordance therewith it was held that the currency of the invoices should be converted at the buying rate in the New York market at noon on the day of exportation (the “free” rate of exchange for pounds sterling), as certified by the Federal Reserve bank and set forth by the collector on each.of the entries involved. The protest was sustained to this extent.
<PAGE>



                                 EXHIBIT 4.4

          COPY OF FUND EIGHT B'S CERTIFICATE OF LIMITED PARTNERSHIP




<PAGE>


                             STATE OF DELAWARE

                    CERTIFICATE OF LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

                                   OF

                       ICON INCOME FUND EIGHT B L.P.


         The Undersigned, desiring to form a limited partnership pursuant to
the provisions of the Delaware Revised Uniform Limited Partnership Act, 6
Delaware Code, Chapter 17, do hereby certify as follows:

         1.   FIRST: The name of the limited partnership is "ICON Income Fund
              Eight B L.P."

         2.   SECOND: The name and address of the Registered Agent is
              Corporation Service Company, 1013 Centre Road, Wilmington,
              (County of New Castle) Delaware 19805

         3.   THIRD: The name and mailing address of each general partner is
              as follows:

                                600 Mamaroneck Avenue
                                  Harrison, NY 10528

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate of
Limited Partnership of ICON Income Fund Eight B L.P. as of this 7th day of
February, 2000.

                                     ICON Income Fund Eight B L.P.
                                     By its General Partner, ICON Captial Corp.


                                     /s/ Thomas W. Martin
                                     ------------------------------------------
                                     Thomas W. Martin
                                     Executive Vice President
Case No. 13,326.

#### STATEN ISLAND AND NEW YORK FERRY CO. v. The THOMAS HUNT.

[N. Y. Times,

June 19, 1862.]

District Court, D. Connecticut.

Salvage — Steamboat Disabled in New York Bay — Custom—Practice—Laches,

[1. Rescuing and taking to a place of safety a steamer caught in the ice in New York Bay on a dark, foggy night, with a broken crank, which disables her for the time being, is a salvage service, but calls only for a small reward.]

[2. An alleged custom of boats running in New York Bay to assist each other in distress free of charge, *held*not to have been proved.]

[3. An objection to a claim for salvage by the owners of the salving vessel on the ground that their cosalvors, the officers and crew, were not joined in the libel, comes too late at the final hearing, especially when it appears that the claims of the cosalvors are barred by laches.]

[This was a libel for salvage, filed by the Staten Island *&*New York Perry Company against the steamboat Thomas Hunt.]

Mr. Williams, for libelants.

Clark & Hale, for claimants.

BY

THE COURT.

This suit is instituted to recover salvage alleged to have been earned by the libelants’ boat, the Southfield, in relieving from distress the Thomas Hunt in New-York Bay, and taking her to a place of safety. The service was rendered on January 19,1861. The night was dark, .somewhat foggy, and considerable quantities of ice were floating in the bay. I have had some doubt whether this was a case of salvage service at all; but I am inclined to the opinion, on the whole, that it was. Capt. Braisted, who was a passenger on the Southfield, testifies to the peril of the Hunt. He is familiar with the navigation of the bay, knew the character of the night, and the situation of the Hunt. She was in the ice, and had broken her crank, by which she was disabled for the time being. The claimants allege a custom among boats of this character running in the bay to assist each other, in case of need, free of charge, and insist that the custom proved covers this case. I think the evidence fails to establish the principle contended for in cases like the one before the court.

It was objected, on the argument for the claimants, that the libel should be dismissed because the cosalvors, the officers and crew of the Southfield, were not joined in the libel. This objection should have been.taken at an earlier stage of the proceedings. No inconvenience can now arise to the claimants upon other claims for salvage for this service. All such claims, if any existed, are barred by delay.

It is a case calling for but a small allowance.

Decree for libelants for $100 and costs.

STATE -OP.

[NOTE. Cases cited under this title will be found arranged in alphabetical order under the names of the states; e. g. “State of Georgia v. Atkins. See Georgia v. Atkins.”]
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Corey Henry, certify that:

1.             I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be
filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2016-1 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

2.             Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;

3.             Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4.            Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this report
under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

5.             All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and
15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Wells Fargo Bank, National
Association.



| | By:    | /s/ Corey Henry                                                                          | 
| | ------ | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
| | Name:  | Corey Henry                                                                             
| | Title: | President and Chief Executive Officer Santander Drive Auto Receivables LLC, as Depositor
| |        | (senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)                           
| | Date:  | March 30, 2020
Before the First Division,

December 16, 1944.

No. 49871.

#### Protest 76638-K of Westergaard, Berg-Johnsen Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Cole, J.

At the trial the appraiser’s advisory report and the collector’s letter transmitting the protest to the court were received in evidence by consent of the parties. In these official papers it was conceded that the merchandise in question is in fact of the kind claimed by the plaintiff. In accordance therewith the protest was sustained.
# C_2016251EN.01003202.xml

| 11.7.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 251/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.7.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 251/32

---

Order of the General Court of 13 May 2016 — CEVA v Commission

(Case T-601/15) (1)

1

((Arbitration clause - Technological research and development project in the area entitled ‘Algae grown from sustainable aquaculture as raw material for biodegradable bioplastics’ - SEABIOPLAS contract - Demand for payment of the financial contribution due - Offsetting - Period allowed for commencing proceedings - Delay - No interest in bringing proceedings - Inadmissibility))

(2016/C 251/38)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Centre d’étude et de valorisation des algues SA (CEVA) (Pleubian, France) (represented by: E. De Boissieu, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: S. Delaude and J. Estrada de Solà, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action under Article 272 TFEU seeking an order that the Commission pay the first instalment of the grant due to the applicant under the SEABIOPLAS contract (reference FP7-SME-2013-606032-SEABIOPLAS) concerning a technological research and development project in the area entitled ‘Algae grown from sustainable aquaculture as raw material for biodegradable bioplastics’.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

| 2. | The Centre d’étude et de valorisation des algues SA (CEVA) is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The Centre d’étude et de valorisation des algues SA (CEVA) is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 429, 21.12.2015

1

---
III 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 433 

Honoring The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals 

for the 140 years of service that it has provided to the citizens of 

the United States and their animals. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 5, 2006 

Mr. DURBIN (for himself, Mr. ENSIGN, and Mr. LAUTENBERG) submitted the 

following resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Honoring The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals for the 140 years of service that it 

has provided to the citizens of the United States and 

their animals. 

Whereas April 10, 2006, marks the 140th anniversary of the 

founding of The American Society for the Prevention of 

Cruelty to Animals (referred to in this preamble as 

‘‘ASPCA’’); 

Whereas ASPCA has provided services to millions of citizens 

of the United States and their animals since Henry 

Bergh established the society in New York City in 1866; 

Whereas ASPCA was the first humane society established in 

the western hemisphere; 


cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 433 ATS

Whereas ASPCA teaches children the character-building virtues of compassion, kindness, and respect for all of God’s 

creatures; 

Whereas the dedicated directors, staff, and volunteers of 

ASPCA have provided shelter, medical care, behavioral 

counseling, and placement for abandoned, abused, or 

homeless animals in the United States for more than a 

century; and 

Whereas ASPCA, through its observance of April as ‘‘Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Month’’, its Animal Poison 

Control Center, and its promotion of humane animal 

treatment through programs dedicated to law enforcement, education, shelter outreach, legislative affairs, 

counseling, veterinary services, and behavioral training, 

has provided invaluable services to the citizens of the 

United States and their animals: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) honors The American Society for the Pre3 vention of Cruelty to Animals for its 140 years of 

4 service to the citizens of the United States and their 

5 animals; and 

6 (2) respectfully requests the Secretary of the 

7 Senate to transmit a copy of this resolution to the 

8 president of The American Society for the Preven9 tion of Cruelty to Animals. 

Æ 


cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                             286
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,610
<ALLOWANCES>                                       256
<INVENTORY>                                     17,438
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                29,440
<PP&E>                                          22,096
<DEPRECIATION>                                  12,888
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  55,346
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,743
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,398
<OTHER-SE>                                      30,104
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    55,346
<SALES>                                         60,536
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                60,536
<CGS>                                           36,853
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   36,853
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                18,426
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    45
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 953
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,638
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,774
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,732
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,732
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.99
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.99
        

</TABLE>
# C_2015320EN.01005401.xml

| 28.9.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 320/54 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.9.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 320/54

---

Action brought on 27 July 2015 — ZZ and ZZ v Commission

(Case F-108/15)

(2015/C 320/75)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicants: ZZ and ZZ (represented by: N. de Montigny and J.N. Louis, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Application for annulment of the Commission’s decision to limit to five years the period of retroactive recalculation of the flat-rate allowance for overtime to which the applicants are entitled.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicants claim that the Tribunal should:

| — | annul the decision of 16 September 2014 of PMO. 1 to limit the payment of the adaptation of the flat-rate allowance for overtime to which the applicants have been entitled since 1 March 2007 and 1 March 2008 respectively, to five years from 1 September 2008, the date on which the PMO discovered the error in the calculation of their remuneration; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of 16 September 2014 of PMO. 1 to limit the payment of the adaptation of the flat-rate allowance for overtime to which the applicants have been entitled since 1 March 2007 and 1 March 2008 respectively, to five years from 1 September 2008, the date on which the PMO discovered the error in the calculation of their remuneration;

| — | order the Commission to pay the applicants the adaptation of the flat-rate allowance for overtime from 1 March 2007 and 1 March 2008 respectively, subject to the deduction of the sums already paid and together with default interest on the arrears of that allowance calculated from their deadline for payment until their actual payment at the rate fixed by the European Central Bank for its main refinancing operations increased by two points; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the applicants the adaptation of the flat-rate allowance for overtime from 1 March 2007 and 1 March 2008 respectively, subject to the deduction of the sums already paid and together with default interest on the arrears of that allowance calculated from their deadline for payment until their actual payment at the rate fixed by the European Central Bank for its main refinancing operations increased by two points;

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 239 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 239

 Recognizing and honoring birthparents who carry out an adoption plan.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 18, 2007

 Mrs. Schmidt (for herself, Mr. Oberstar, and Ms. Ginny Brown-Waite of 
   Florida) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
            referred to the Committee on Education and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
 Recognizing and honoring birthparents who carry out an adoption plan.

Whereas once a pregnant woman and the man involved in the pregnancy (the 
        birthparents) decide that they are unable to parent a child, carrying 
        out an adoption plan is highly admirable;
Whereas for the birthparents, carrying out an adoption plan can be an expression 
        of great love for the child and can be what it means to be the best 
        parent possible;
Whereas birthparents who decide to carry out an adoption plan come from all 
        walks of life, with various backgrounds and socioeconomic status;
Whereas in 2002 (the most recent year for which such statistics are available), 
        there were 22,291 domestic infant adoptions in the United States;
Whereas birthparents should be recognized, honored, and commended for making a 
        loving decision to carry out an adoption plan; and
Whereas Congress should endeavor to do more to support birthparents who carry 
        out an adoption plan: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That Congress recognizes and honors birthparents who carry out an 
adoption plan.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the 
Company's Balance Sheet as of June 30, 1997 and the Statement Of Income
for the period ended June 30, 1997, and is qualified in its entirety by 
reference to such financial statements.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          84,125
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                84,125
<PP&E>                                       7,995,908
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,878,473
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,224,397<F1>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           44,607<F2>
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (646,984)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,224,397<F3>
<SALES>                                        534,579<F4>
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               534,579
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                33,915<F5>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             134,111
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                366,553
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            366,553
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   366,553
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   509.10<F6>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   509.10<F6>
<FN>
<F1>Includes unamortized mortgage refinancing costs
<F2>Accrued interest on mortgage, and first mortgage principal payments 
    due within one year
<F3>Includes long-term debt 
<F4>Rental income includes basic rent and advance of primary overage rent
<F5>Supervisory services and amortization of mortgage refinance costs
<F6>Earnings per $5,000 participation unit, based on 720 participation units
    outstanding during the period
</FN>
        


</TABLE>