alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           JAN-1-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                OCT-2-1999
<CASH>                                           1,119
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   92,404
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,430
<INVENTORY>                                    185,272
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               277,898
<PP&E>                                         315,899
<DEPRECIATION>                                 221,796
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 432,221
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          298,704
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      1,698
<COMMON>                                        34,676
<OTHER-SE>                                      90,759
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   432,221
<SALES>                                        278,234
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               278,234
<CGS>                                          271,961
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  310,648
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,157
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   920
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              19,132
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (55,623)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (7,466)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (48,157)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 24,938
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (23,219)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.74)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.74)


</TABLE>
III 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 603 

Designating Thursday, November 16, 2006, as ‘‘Feed America Day’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 30 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 29), 2006 

Mr. HATCH (for himself and Mr. BENNETT) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

NOVEMBER 16, 2006 

Committee discharged; considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating Thursday, November 16, 2006, as ‘‘Feed 

America Day’’. 

Whereas Thanksgiving Day celebrates the spirit of selfless 

giving and an appreciation for family and friends; 

Whereas the spirit of Thanksgiving Day is a virtue upon 

which the United States was founded; 

Whereas, in 2006, great numbers of citizens of the United 

States continue to suffer hunger and other privations; 

and 

Whereas selfless sacrifice breeds a genuine spirit of Thanksgiving, both affirming and restoring the fundamental 

principles of the society of the United States: Now, therefore, be it 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 603 ATS 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates Thursday, November 16, 2006, 

3 as ‘‘Feed America Day’’; and 

4 (2) calls upon the people of the United States— 

5 (A) to sacrifice 2 meals on Thursday, No6 vember 16, 2006; and 

7 (B) to donate to a religious or charitable 

8 organization of their choice the money that they 

9 would have spent on food for that day for the 

10 purpose of feeding the hungry. 

Æ 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 171 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 171

Expressing the sense of Congress with respect to relocating the United 
                 States Embassy in Israel to Jerusalem.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 20, 2007

 Mr. Tancredo submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Expressing the sense of Congress with respect to relocating the United 
                 States Embassy in Israel to Jerusalem.

Whereas the Jerusalem Embassy Act of 1995 (Public Law 104-45; 109 Stat. 398) 
        requires that the United States Embassy in Israel be established in 
        Jerusalem;
Whereas section 7 of such Act allows the President to suspend the requirement 
        that the United States Embassy in Israel be established in Jerusalem if 
        the suspension is necessary to protect the national security interests 
        of the United States;
Whereas the Clinton and Bush administrations suspended such requirement;
Whereas every sovereign nation has the right to designate its own capital;
Whereas Jerusalem has been the capital of Israel since 1950;
Whereas Jerusalem has been a united and undivided city governed by Israel since 
        1967;
Whereas Jerusalem is the seat of the Government of Israel, including the 
        President, Parliament, and Supreme Court of Israel;
Whereas the United States conducts official meetings and other business in the 
        city of Jerusalem;
Whereas in every country except Israel, the United States maintains its Embassy 
        in the city designated by the host country; and
Whereas relocating the United States Embassy in Israel to Jerusalem will express 
        the continued support of the United States for Israel and for an 
        undivided Jerusalem: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),  
That Congress--
            (1) maintains its commitment to relocating the United 
        States Embassy in Israel to Jerusalem; and
            (2) urges the President, pursuant to the Jerusalem Embassy 
        Act of 1995 (Public Law 104-45; 109 Stat. 398), to immediately 
        begin the process of relocating the United States Embassy in 
        Israel to Jerusalem.
                                 <all>
```
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the Court has determined th a t

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS for the Fifth Circuit

_____________________________________

No. 98-30052

_____________________________________ CAPITOL HOUSE PRESERVATION COMPANY, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant, VERSUS PERRYMAN CONSULTANTS, INC., ET AL., Defendants, PERRYMAN CONSULTANTS, INC., ET AL., Defendants-Appellees ************** CAPITOL HOUSE PRESERVATION COMPANY, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant, VERSUS JAZZ ENTERPRISES, INC., ET AL., Defendants, JAZZ ENTERPRISES, INC., ET AL., Defendants-Appellees.

______________________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana

(95-CV-725)

______________________________________________________ November 10, 1998 Before WISDOM, DAVIS and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * AFFIRMED. See Local Rule 47.6.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 73 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 73

            Honoring the life of Enrique ``Kiki'' Camarena.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 8, 2005

Mr. Biden submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
            Honoring the life of Enrique ``Kiki'' Camarena.

Whereas Enrique ``Kiki'' Camarena, a Special Agent of the Drug Enforcement 
        Administration for 11 years, was abducted and brutally murdered by drug 
        barons in 1985;
Whereas Enrique Camarena dedicated his life to serving the law enforcement 
        community and the Nation as a whole and was the devoted husband of 
        Geneva Alvarado and loving father of Enrique, Daniel, and Eric;
Whereas Enrique Camarena received 2 Sustained Superior Performance Awards and a 
        Special Achievement Award while serving the Drug Enforcement 
        Administration;
Whereas Enrique Camarena's dedication to reducing the scourge of drugs 
        eventually cost him his life;
Whereas ``Camarena Clubs'' to combat drug abuse have been created in high 
        schools across the Nation to honor his memory;
Whereas Enrique Camarena is honored each year during National Red Ribbon Week; 
        and
Whereas the 20th Anniversary of Enrique Camarena's death will be specially 
        honored on March 9, 2005, at the Drug Enforcement Administration 
        headquarters: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) mourns the loss of Enrique ``Kiki'' Camarena;
            (2) recognizes the contributions of Enrique Camarena to our 
        National efforts to combat drug abuse;
            (3) admires the courage and dedication of Enrique Camarena 
        in his work as a Special Agent of the Drug Enforcement 
        Administration;
            (4) expresses gratitude for the legacy left by Enrique 
        Camarena; and
            (5) directs the Secretary of the Senate to transmit an 
        enrolled copy of this resolution to the family of Enrique 
        Camarena.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 83 (Tuesday, May 1, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 23810]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-8209]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP07-403-000]

Northern Natural Gas Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC 
Gas Tariff

April 24, 2007.
    Take notice that on April 19, 2007, Northern Natural Gas Company 
(Northern), tendered for filing in its FERC Gas Tariff, Fifth Revised 
Volume No. 1, Ninth Revised Sheet No. 146, to become effective May 20, 
2007.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed in accordance with the provisions of 
Section 154.210 of the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 154.210). 
Anyone filing an intervention or protest must serve a copy of that 
document on the Applicant. Anyone filing an intervention or protest on 
or before the intervention or protest date need not serve motions to 
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
[email protected], or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-8209 Filed 4-30-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
```
No. 65693.

#### Sears, Roebuck and Co. *v.*United States,

protests 61/4675, 61/4676, and 61/4677 (Philadelphia).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Schmidt Pritchard & Co. et al.*(47 C.C.P.A. 152, C.A.D. 750), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Case No. 14,628.

#### UNITED STATES v. BOWEN.

[2 Cranch. C. C. 133.]1

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

April Term, 1817.

Lahceny — Goons and Chattels — Banknotes.

Banknotes are not goods and chattels, nor I money, and stealing them is no offence at common law.

[Cited in U. S. v. Carnot, Case No. 14,726.]

Indictment, at common law [against Henry Bowen, a negro], for stealing a banknote. Verdict, guilty.

Judgmentarrested;

THE COURT

(THRUS-TON, • Circuit Judge, absent)

being of opinion that it was no offence at common law to steal a banknote.
Before the First Division,

May 26, 1949

No. 53199.

#### Alpha Importing Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 961730-G, etc. (San Francisco).

*326Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
# C_2019288EN.01004101.xml

| 26.8.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 288/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.8.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 288/41

---

Judgment of the General Court of 19 June 2019 — NeXovation v Commission

(Case T-353/15) (1)

(State aid - Individual aid in favour of the Nürburgring complex for the construction of a leisure park, hotels and restaurants as well as for the organisation of motor races - Decision finding the aid to be incompatible with the internal market - Decision finding that the reimbursement of the aid found to be incompatible does not concern the new owner of the Nürburgring complex - Action for annulment - No substantial effect on competitive position - Inadmissibility - Decision finding no State aid after the preliminary examination stage - Action for annulment - Interested party - Legal interest in bringing an action - Admissibility - Breach of procedural rights - No difficulties that would have required the initiation of a formal investigation procedure - Complaint - Sale of the assets of the beneficiaries of the State aid found to be incompatible - Open, transparent, non-discriminatory and unconditional tender process - Diligent and impartial examination - Obligation to state reasons)

(2019/C 288/53)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: NeXovation, Inc. (Hendersonville, United States) (represented initially by A. von Bergwelt, F. Henkel and M. Nordmann, and subsequently by A. von Bergwelt and M. Nordmann, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by L. Flynn, T. Maxian Rusche and B. Stromsky, Agents)

Re:

Action pursuant to Article 263 TFEU seeking the partial annulment of Commission Decision (EU) 2016/151 of 1 October 2014 on the State aid SA.31550 (2012/C) (ex 2012/NN) implemented by Germany for Nürburgring (OJ 2016 L 34, p. 1).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Orders that the application for a decision that there is no need to adjudicate on the action be considered together with the substance of the case; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Orders that the application for a decision that there is no need to adjudicate on the action be considered together with the substance of the case;

| 2. | Orders that the application for a decision that there is no need to adjudicate on the action be dismissed; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders that the application for a decision that there is no need to adjudicate on the action be dismissed;

| 3. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Dismisses the action;

| 4. | Orders NeXovation, Inc. to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders NeXovation, Inc. to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 311, 21.9.2015.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000099102
<NAME> TRANS-INDUSTRIES INC

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         298,946
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                8,970,152
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 11,992,215
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            22,326,618
<PP&E>                                      16,906,047
<DEPRECIATION>                              10,188,449
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              30,907,381
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       12,652,463
<BONDS>                                      4,184,276
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       313,974
<OTHER-SE>                                  13,083,128
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                30,907,381
<SALES>                                     18,428,049
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            18,493,195
<CGS>                                       12,980,362
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,970,419
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             415,648
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                126,766
<INCOME-TAX>                                    93,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             33,766
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    33,766
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01


</TABLE>
(Reap. Dec. 9393)

#### Pioneer Manufacturing Co. *v.*United States

Entry No. 875636.

(Decided April 13, 1959)

Plaintiff not represented by counsel.

*George Cochran Dowl>,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Lawrence,

Judge: Wben the above-enumerated appeal for a reap-praisement was called for hearing, there was no appearance on behalf of plaintiff and the case was ordered submitted by the court.

Rule 5 (a) of the rules of the court provides that—

> The submission for decision of any case shall be made in open court by the parties thereto or their attorneys, or by stipulation, or by written request to the court, or by the court on its own motion. Where the plaintiff, petitioner, or appellant, or his attorney, in a case does not appear when the same is called, and after the opposite party has had opportunity to present evidence on the issues, it may be deemed submitted and may be decided by the court on the record as it appears therein.

Accordingly, I have examined the record in the appeal before the court and find nothing therein which tends in any way to overcome the presumption of correctness which attaches to the decision of the appraiser. I find and hold, therefore, that the proper values of the merchandise are the values returned by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
# C_2015190EN.01003701.xml

| 8.6.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 190/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.6.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 190/37

---

Action brought on 27 March 2015 — FS v EESC

(Case F-50/15)

(2015/C 190/44)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: FS (represented by: L. Levi and A. Tymen, lawyers)

Defendant: European Economic and Social Committee (EESC)

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision not to confirm the applicant in her post as head of unit and a claim for damages for the material and non-pecuniary harm allegedly suffered.

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of 25 May 2014 of the President of the European Economic and Social Committee (EESC) not confirming the applicant in her post as head of unit; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of 25 May 2014 of the President of the European Economic and Social Committee (EESC) not confirming the applicant in her post as head of unit;

| — | Annul the decision of 25 May 2014 entitled ‘Rider No 2’, reassigning the applicant to a non-management post; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of 25 May 2014 entitled ‘Rider No 2’, reassigning the applicant to a non-management post;

| — | In so far as necessary, annul the decision of 18 December 2014 rejecting the applicant’s claim of 21 August 2014; |
| --- | --- |

—

In so far as necessary, annul the decision of 18 December 2014 rejecting the applicant’s claim of 21 August 2014;

| — | Compensate the applicant for her material and non-pecuniary loss; |
| --- | --- |

—

Compensate the applicant for her material and non-pecuniary loss;

| — | Order the EESC to pay all the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the EESC to pay all the costs.

---
# C_2017078EN.01002102.xml

| 13.3.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 78/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.3.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 78/21

---

Judgment of the General Court of 1 February 2017 — Gómez Echevarría v EUIPO — M and M Direct (wax by Yuli’s)

(Case T-19/15) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU figurative mark wax by Yuli’s - Earlier EU word mark MADWAX and earlier national figurative mark wax - Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 - Extent of the examination carried out by the Board of Appeal - Article 64(1) of Regulation No 207/2009 - Rights of the defence - Article 41(2)(a) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights - Abuse of rights - Costs of representation before EUIPO - Article 85(1) of Regulation No 207/2009))

(2017/C 078/28)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Yuleidy Caridad Gómez Echevarría (Benalmádena, Spain) (represented by: E. López-Chicheri y Selma, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: S. Palmero Cabezas, Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: M and M Direct Ltd (London, United Kingdom)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 6 November 2014 (Case R 951/2014-1) relating to invalidity proceedings between M and M Direct and Ms Gómez Echevarría.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Ms Yuleidy Caridad Gómez Echevarría to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Ms Yuleidy Caridad Gómez Echevarría to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 89, 16.3.2015.

1

---