alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(logo) pwc

 

 

**Report of IndependentRegistered Public Accounting Firm**

 

 

To the Board of Directors andshareholders of CoreLogic, Inc.:

 

We have examinedmanagement’s assertion, included in the accompanying Report on Assessmentof Compliance, that CoreLogic Commercial Real Estate Services, Inc. (the"Company"), a subsidiary of CoreLogic, Inc. complied with theservicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission'sRegulation AB for all loans for commercial mortgage loan outsourcing customersfor which the Company served as the commercial tax service provider (the"Platform"), as of December 31, 2016 and for the year then ended,only including 1122(d)(1)(iv), 1122(d)(2)(ii), 1122(d)(2)(v), 1122(d)(2)(vi),1122(d)(2)(vii), 1122(d)(4)(xi), 1122(d)(4)(xii) and 1122(d)(4)(xiii), whichthe Company has determined are applicable to the servicing activities performedby it with respect to the Platform. Management is responsible for the Company'scompliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express anopinion on management's assertion based on our examination.

 

Our examination was conductedin accordance with attestation standards of the Public Company AccountingOversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a testbasis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the applicableservicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considerednecessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of selectedservicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether theCompany performed those selected activities in compliance with the applicableservicing criteria. Our procedures were limited to the selected servicingactivities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report.Our procedures were not designed to detect noncompliance arising from errorsthat may have occurred prior to or subsequent to our tests that may haveaffected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company duringthe period covered by this report. We believe that our examination provides areasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legaldetermination on the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria.

 

In our opinion,management’s assertion that the Company complied with the aforementionedapplicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016for all loans for commercial mortgage loan outsourcing customers for which theCompany served as the commercial tax service provider is fairly stated, in allmaterial respects.

 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers

 

February 6, 2017

 

 

*PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP,2001 Ross Avenue, Suite 1800, Dallas TX 75201-2997*

*T: 214-746-6500, F:214-712-6660,*www.pwc.com
# C_2017086EN.01002501.xml

| 20.3.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 86/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.3.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 86/25

---

Judgment of the General Court of 9 February 2017 — Bodegas Vega Sicilia v EUIPO (TEMPOS VEGA SICILIA)

(Case T-696/15) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Application for the EU word mark TEMPOS VEGA SICILIA - Absolute ground for refusal - Trade mark for wine with geographical indications - Article 7(1)(j) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2017/C 086/33)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Bodegas Vega Sicilia, SA (Valbuena de Duero, Spain) (represented by: S. Alonso Maruri, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Muñiz Rodríguez and A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 30 September 2015 (Case R 285/2015-4) concerning an application for registration of the word sign TEMPOS VEGA SICILIA as an EU trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Bodegas Vega Sicilia, SA to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Bodegas Vega Sicilia, SA to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 38, 1.2.2016.

1

---
# C_2017277EN.01003201.xml

| 21.8.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 277/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.8.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 277/32

---

Judgment of the General Court of 6 July 2017 — SNCM v Commission

(Case T-1/15) (1)

1

((State aid - Aid measures implemented by France in favour of SNCM - Restructuring aid and mesures taken in the context of a privatisation plan - Private investor in a market economy test - Decision declaring the aid unlawful and incompatible with the internal market - Social policy of the Member States - Re-opening of the formal investigation procedure - Obligation to state reasons - Equal treatment - Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights))

(2017/C 277/46)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Société nationale maritime Corse Méditerranée (SNCM) (Marseille, France) (represented by: F.-C. Laprévote, C. Froitzheim and A. Dupuis, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: V. Di Bucci and B. Stromsky, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Intervener in support of the applicant: Comité d’entreprise de la Société nationale maritime Corse Méditerranée (SNCM) (Marseille) (represented by: C. Bonnefoi, lawyer)

Intervener in support of the applicant:

Intervener in support of the defendant: Corsica Ferries France (Bastia, France) (represented by: N. Flandin and S. Rodrigues, lawyers)

Intervener in support of the defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU for annulment of Commission Decision C(2013) 7066 final of 20 November 2013, concerning State aid SA.16237 (C 58/2002) (ex N 118/2002) implemented by France in favour of SNCM.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Société nationale maritime Corse Méditerranée (SNCM) to bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission and Corsica Ferries France; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Société nationale maritime Corse Méditerranée (SNCM) to bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission and Corsica Ferries France;

| 3. | Orders the comité d’entreprise de la Société nationale maritime Corse Méditerranée (SNCM) to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the comité d’entreprise de la Société nationale maritime Corse Méditerranée (SNCM) to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 56, 16.2.2015.

1

---
# Missouri Court of Appeals

Southern District

JUNE 8, 2015

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED PURSUANT TO RULE 84.16(b).

1. Case No. SD33593

Re: FARON R. COLLINS,

Movant-Appellant,

v. STATE OF MISSOURI,

Respondent-Respondent.
# C_2015363EN.01002502.xml

| 3.11.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 363/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.11.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 363/25

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Vestre Landsret (Denmark) lodged on 7 September 2015 — Sjelle Autogenbrug I/S v Skatteministeriet

(Case C-471/15)

(2015/C 363/32)

Language of the case: Danish

Referring court

Referring court

Vestre Landsret

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Sjelle Autogenbrug I/S

Applicant:

Defendant: Skatteministeriet

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

In the circumstances of the present case, can parts from end-of-life vehicles which a VAT-registered vehicle reuse undertaking removes from a vehicle with a view to resale as spare parts be regarded as second-hand goods as referred to in Article 311(1) of Council Directive 2006/112/EC (1) of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (VAT Directive)?

1

---

(1)  OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1.

1

---
# C_2015381EN.01006501.xml

| 16.11.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 381/65 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.11.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 381/65

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 8 October 2015 — FK v CEPOL

(Case F-41/15) (1)

1

(2015/C 381/91)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 178, 1.6.2015, p. 28.

1

---
# C_2016428EN.01001402.xml

| 21.11.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 428/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.11.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 428/14

---

Judgment of the General Court of 11 October 2016 — Perry Ellis International Group v EUIPO — CG (p)

(Case T-350/15) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative mark likely to be perceived as the letter ‘p’ - Earlier EU and national figurative marks P PROTECTIVE and P - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2016/C 428/15)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Perry Ellis International Group Holdings Ltd (Nassau, Bahamas) (represented by: O. Günzel, V. Ahmann and C. Tenkhoff, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Stoyanova-Valchanova, M. Fischer and D. Gája, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervening before the General Court: CG Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH (Gevelsberg, Germany) (represented by: T. Körber and T.- E. Vlah, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervening before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 28 April 2015 (Case R 2441/2014-4) relating to opposition proceedings between CG Verwaltungsgesellschaft and Perry Ellis International Group Holdings.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Perry Ellis International Group Holdings Ltd to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Perry Ellis International Group Holdings Ltd to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 270, 17.8.2015.

1

---
# C_2016279EN.01002502.xml

| 1.8.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 279/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.8.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 279/25

---

Order of the President of the Court of 25 April 2016 — European Commission v Grand Duchy of Luxembourg

(Case C-684/15) (1)

1

(2016/C 279/37)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 98, 14.3.2016.

1

---
Case: 2:12-cv-01188-EAS-EPD Doc #: 52 Filed: 11/15/13 Page: 1 of 1  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-11T12:26:13-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
### U.S. Geological survey

Open-File Report 95-684

# Digital Representation of the Washington State Geologic Map:  A Contribution to the Interior Columbia Basin Ecosystem Management
Project

## By Gary L. Raines and Bruce R. Johnson

## 1996

Small map showing that the study area extends from eastern Washington and Oregon, across Idaho to western Montana and Wyoming then extends from the Canadian border south to northeastern California and northernmost Nevada and UtahIndex map showing location of ICBEMP study area (from figure 1).

---

Files available for downloading:

View the ReadMe file (1.3 kb)

Download Open-File Report 95-684
as an Adobe Acrobat PDF file 22 pages long (248 kb).

Download the Geology Dataset in compressed (**.z) Arc/Info Export format: (3.1 MB download file, 6.9 MB uncompressed).

Download the Faults Dataset in compressed (**.z) Arc/Info Export format: (96 kb download file, 232 kb uncompressed).

For questions about the scientific content of this report, contact Gary Raines

---

Download a free copy of the latest version of Adobe Reader.

---

USGS Information Services 

Box 25286 Federal Center

Denver, CO 80225

Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS

E-mail: infoservices@usgs.gov

---

| Help
| PDF help |

| Publications main page
| Open-file reports [on line] |
 
| Department of the Interior
| U.S. Geological Survey |

| Geologic Division
|Western Mineral Resources|

| Privacy Statement
| Disclaimer
| Accessibility |

The URL for this page is:  https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/1995/of95-684/

Please send comments and suggestions, or report problems, to:
Michael Diggles

Updated: January 30, 2009 (bwr, mfd)
III 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 582 

Urging the people of the United States to observe Global Family Day and 

One Day of Peace and Sharing. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 25, 2006 

Mr. REID (for Mr. INOUYE) submitted the following resolution; which was 

considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Urging the people of the United States to observe Global 

Family Day and One Day of Peace and Sharing. 

Whereas in 2005, the people of the world suffered many calamitous events, including devastation from tsunamis, 

terror attacks, wars, famines, genocides, hurricanes, 

earthquakes, political and religious conflicts, diseases, 

poverty, and rioting, all necessitating global cooperation, 

compassion, and unity previously unprecedented among 

diverse cultures, faiths, and economic classes; 

Whereas grave global challenges in 2006 may require cooperation and innovative problem-solving among citizens 

and nations on an even greater scale; 

Whereas, on December 15, 2000, Congress adopted Senate 

Concurrent Resolution 138, expressing the sense of Congress that the President of the United States should 


jcorcoran on PRODPC62 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 582 ATS 

issue a proclamation each year calling upon the people of 

the United States and interested organizations to observe 

an international day of peace and sharing at the beginning of each year; 

Whereas, in 2001, the United Nations General Assembly 

adopted Resolution 56/2, which invited ‘‘Member States, 

intergovernmental and non-governmental organizations 

and all the peoples of the world to celebrate One Day in 

Peace, 1 January 2002, and every year thereafter’’; 

Whereas many foreign heads of State have recognized the importance of establishing Global Family Day, a special day 

of international unity, peace, and sharing, on the first 

day of each year; and 

Whereas family is the basic structure of humanity, thus, we 

must all look to the stability and love within our individual families to create stability in the global community: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate urgently requests— 

2 (1) the people of the United States to observe 

3 Global Family Day and One Day of Peace and Shar4 ing with appropriate activities stressing the need— 

5 (A) to eradicate violence, hunger, poverty, 

6 and suffering; and 

7 (B) to establish greater trust and fellow8 ship among peace-loving countries and families 

9 everywhere; and 

10 (2) that American businesses, labor organiza11 tions, and faith and civic leaders are urged to join 


jcorcoran on PRODPC62 with BILLS
3 

•SRES 582 ATS 

1 in promoting appropriate activities for Americans 

2 and in extending appropriate greetings from the 

3 families of America to families in the rest of the 

4 world. 

Æ 


jcorcoran on PRODPC62 with BILLS
Case No. 9,951.

#### MURPHY v. McVICKER et al.

[4 McLean, 252.] 1

Circuit Court, D. Michigan.

June Term, 1847.

Fraud — Bilí, to Rescind — Offer to Return— Deeds — Executed under Defective Power.

1. A party who desires to rescind a contract on the ground of fraud, must offer to return the thing purchased, whether it be land or personal pi operty.

[Cited in brief in Morroiv v. Rees, 69 Pa. St. 872.]

2. The vendor must be placed by the vendee in the condition he was in before the purchase.

8. The deed being defective, being made under a defective power, the court will decree a conveyance. on the payment of the residue of the purchase money.

In equity.

Mr. Backus, for complainant.

AXx-. Seaman, for defendant

OPINION OF

THE COURT.

This bill was filed, apparently, with the view of rescinding a contract for the purchase of a tract of land in Eaton county. The consideration agreed to be paid was the sum of four hundred and eighty dollars, and the complainant represents the land is not worth half that amount. That fraudulent representations were made to him by the vendor, as to the locality of the land, and its quality, w'hich induced the complainant to purchase it. But there is no specific prayer for a rescission of the contract, no tender of a reconveyance, and no offer to surrender the possession. It is therefore clear there can be no decree, under the bill, to rescind the contract. The chief object of the bill would seem to be to procure an effective deed for the land. It was purchased by the complainant, and a deed was executed to him under an insufficient power of attorney. The defects in the power are stated to be, that it lias but one witness, aDd is not under seal. These defects are radical, as they did not authorize the conveyance that seems to have been executed under it. A power of attorney, to authorize the conveyance of land in fee simple, must have all the solemnities and forms required to make effective the instrument to be executed. The statute re-, quires two witnesses; of course, the power must, have two witnesses. And as a deed is inoperative, as such, without a seal, it can not be executed under an authority without seal.

The court, therefore, will decree that a good and effective deed shall be executed by the defendant, of general warranty, and held j ready to be delivered on the payment of the balance of the purchase money w'hich remains due.
A97A0816.

#### POTTS et al. v. UAP-GA AG CHEM, INC. et al.

(510 SE2d 841)

Decided December 17, 1998

Reconsideration denied January 12,1999.

*Stephen L. Ivie, John M. Brown,*for appellants.

*King & Spalding, J. Kevin Buster, Carmen R. Toledo, Gardner, Willis, Sweat & Goldsmith, Donald A. Sweat, Goetz, Tibbs & Zahler, Charles M. Goetz, Jr.,*for appellees.

1

 For Presiding Judge A. W. Birdsong, deceased.

Andrews, Chief Judge.

The Supreme Court in *Potts v. UAP-GA AG CHEM,*270 Ga. 14 (506 SE2d 101) (1998) reversed our affirmance of the superior court’s grant of summary judgment to the employer in this wrongful death and survival action, finding the employee was not engaged in work activity so that the exclusive remedy provision of OCGA § 34-9-11 did not apply. Therefore, our judgment in *Potts v. UAP-GA AG CHEM,*227 Ga. App. 841 (490 SE2d 432) (1997), is vacated, and the judgment of the Supreme Court is made the judgment of this Court.

*Judgment reversed.*

*McMurray, P. J., Beasley, Smith, Ruffin, Eldridge, JJ., and Senior Appellate Judge Harold R.*Banke1*concur.*
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 18

- 3399

_____________________________
D AVID L EE M OBLEY , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Bradford County

. Aymer L. Curtin , Judge

. September 11, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
B.L. T HOMAS , R OWE , and O STERHAUS , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Megan Long, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee
, for A ppellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                             5
       
<S>                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                     Aug-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                        Sep-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                          Nov-30-1997
<CASH>                                $13,077
<SECURITIES>                          $0
<RECEIVABLES>                         $24,015
<ALLOWANCES>                          $543
<INVENTORY>                           $65,725
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                      $109,704
<PP&E>                                $242,120
<DEPRECIATION>                        $63,021
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        $342,210
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                 $52,577
<BONDS>                               $200,988
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                 0
<PREFERRED>                           0
<COMMON>                              0
<OTHER-SE>                            $53,662
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>          $342,210
<SALES>                               $213,302
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                      $213,302
<CGS>                                 $186,121
<TOTAL-COSTS>                         $19,116
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                      $0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                      $75
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    $5,724
<INCOME-PRETAX>                       $1,207
<INCOME-TAX>                          $482
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                   $725
<DISCONTINUED>                        $0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                       $0
<CHANGES>                             $0
<NET-INCOME>                          $725
<EPS-PRIMARY>                         $0
<EPS-DILUTED>                         $0
        


</TABLE>
Skip to content

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

≡
    - Home        - PMEL Home
      - NCTR Home 
    - Tsunami Forecasting
    - Hazard Assessment        - Alaska
      - California
      - Hawaii
      - Oregon
      - Washington State
      - Florida
      - Nuclear Regulatory Commission
      - Western Pacific
      - Reports 
    - Research        - Modeling
      - Model Benchmarks
      - Publications
      - YouTube Animations 
    - DART
    - Events
    - Info        - Education
      - Data
      - Links
      - FAQ 

DART® (Deep-ocean Assessment and Reporting of Tsunamis)

##  DART® real-time tsunami monitoring systems, developed by PMEL, are positioned at strategic locations throughout the ocean and play a critical role in tsunami forecasting.

| DART® - ETD buoy system					Deep Ocean Assessment of Tsunami (DART)					Easy to Deploy (ETD) | Interactive map at NDBC |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|
|  | More information about  DART®- DART 4G product brochure
- DART®  References and Technical Info 
- How  DART® helps tsunami forecasting
- How the DART® buoy was developed 
- Description of Real-time DART System Messages |  - Realtime  and  Retrospective  DART® Data
- Historical DART® background information    - Overview of the First  operational DART® Mooring System
  - Overview of the Second **DART II® system** 
  - Early DART®  buoy deployments and photos 
  - First generation  DART® buoy photograph |
|--|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

National Oceanic and Atmospheric AdministrationPacific Marine Environmental Laboratory | NOAA Center for Tsunami Researchoar.pmel.tsunami-webmaster@noaa.gov

DOC | NOAA | OAR | PMEL | NCTR | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer

 

Contact Us | About | Internal