alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>        5
       
<S>                                     <C>       
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       Aug-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                          Sep-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                            Nov-30-1996                     
<CASH>                                        5,197
<SECURITIES>                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                                10,787
<ALLOWANCES>                                      0
<INVENTORY>                                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             15,984    
<PP&E>                                      509,888
<DEPRECIATION>                              420,013
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              579,894    
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     3,941,321
<BONDS>                                           0 
<COMMON>                                 38,258,096
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                        0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                579,894
<SALES>                                           0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  0
<CGS>                                             0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     0  
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                         (1,133,302)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       (1,133,302)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   0
<INCOME-TAX>                                      0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               0
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                             (1,133,302)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   .03
        

</TABLE>
III 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 553 

Expressing the sense of the Senate that the Citizens’ Stamp Advisory Committee should recommend to the Postmaster General that a commemorative postage stamp be issued in honor of Varian Fry. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

AUGUST 3, 2006 

Mr. MENENDEZ submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the Senate that the Citizens’ Stamp 

Advisory Committee should recommend to the Postmaster General that a commemorative postage stamp 

be issued in honor of Varian Fry. 

Whereas Varian Mackey Fry, of Ridgewood, New Jersey, embodied the spirit of heroism and demonstrated personal 

bravery of the highest order during the Holocaust; 

Whereas, while serving as a representative of the Emergency 

Refugee Committee in German-occupied Vichy, France, 

between 1940 and 1941, Varian Fry helped save the lives 

of approximately 1,500 Jews and hundreds of other antiNazi refugees; 

Whereas Varian Fry established a legal French relief organization, the Centre Americain de Secou, as a cover for his 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 553 IS 

heroic but sometimes unlawful actions on behalf of the 

refugees, including— 

(1) securing false visas; 

(2) planning daring escape routes through the 

mountains of Southern France; 

(3) illegally chartering ships to transport refugees 

out of France; and 

(4) exchanging funding for these operations on the 

black market; 

Whereas, in order to save thousands of Jews and refugees 

who were threatened by the Nazis, Varian Fry risked his 

personal safety, forfeited his employment as a writer with 

the Foreign Policy Association, and was ultimately expelled from France because his actions contravened the 

policies of the Vichy French government; 

Whereas the efforts of Varian Fry resulted in the rescue of 

approximately 2,000 persons, including such distinguished artists and intellectuals as Marc Chagall, Max 

Ernst, Hannah Arendt, Franz Werfel, Jacques Lipchitz, 

Lion Feuchtwanger, and Heinrich Mann; 

Whereas, in 1967, for his heroic actions, Varian Fry received 

the Croix de Chevalier of the French Legion of Honor, 

1 of the highest civilian honors of France; and 

Whereas, in 1996, Varian Fry was named ‘‘Righteous Among 

the Nations’’ by Yad Vashem, the Holocaust Heroes and 

Martyrs Remembrance Authority in Jerusalem, making 

him the first citizen of the United States to receive the 

highest honor bestowed by Israel to individuals who 

worked as rescuers during the Holocaust: Now, therefore, 

be it 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
3 

•SRES 553 IS 

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that the 

2 Citizens’ Stamp Advisory Committee should recommend to 

3 the Postmaster General that a commemorative postage 

4 stamp be issued in honor of Varian Fry. 

Æ 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
Memo to Docket EPA

- HQ

- OAR

- 2010

- 0280

2013 Methyl Bromide Critical Use Exemption

On May 2, 2012, David Donaldson, Jeremy Arling, Elisa Rim, and Bill Chism of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency met with David McAllister, Paul Niday, Tracy Heinzman, and David Markert of the Methyl Bromide Industry Panel.

MBIP inquired into the status of the 2012 final rule and its relation to the amounts authorized in the no action assurance letter from EPA’s Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assistance. MBIP asked about EPA’s calculation of the Supply Chain Factor and pro vided updated data. MBIP reiterated their public comment that the Supply Chain Factor amount should equal at least one year’s production.

EPA inquired into the use and availability of pre

- phaseout inventory. MBIP noted the shift in

critical uses to Calif

ornia and discussed how under current industry practice inventory is sold and applied by regional distributors. MBIP expressed doubt that material would be transported across the country. MBIP also stated that to their knowledge there was not any forward c ontracting for the sale of methyl bromide inventory.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                           7

                   
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
       

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1997
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           90,847,931
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                          0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                            0
<EQUITIES>                                     215,630
<MORTGAGE>                                     0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                  0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 91,063,561
<CASH>                                         157,782
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                             402,060
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                         4,967,800
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 111,543,663
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                42,356,119
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                            21,991,362
<POLICY-OTHER>                                 2,069,060
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                          0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       2,836,781
<OTHER-SE>                                     39,898,505
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   111,543,663
<PREMIUMS>                                     27,373,507
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                            3,689,775
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                             25,093
<OTHER-INCOME>                                 5,222,140
<BENEFITS>                                     14,742,677
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                    7,965,440
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                           5,564,130
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                8,038,268
<INCOME-TAX>                                   2,437,724
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            5,600,544
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   5,600,544
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .88
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .88
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                 0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                            0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                              0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                             0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                               0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                        0
        


</TABLE>
KRONOS ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES WV, INC. SECRETARY'S AND INCUMBENCY CERTIFICATE



KRONOS ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES WV, INC.

 SECRETARY’S AND INCUMBENCY CERTIFICATE

 

 

On this 7th day of April, 2022, the undersigned, does hereby certify that I am the Secretary of Kronos Advanced Technologies WV, Inc., a West Virginia corporation (the “Corporation”), that I keep and maintain the records of the Corporation, and that I hereby certify effective as of the date of this Certificate, as follows: 

1.Attached hereto as Exhibit A is a true, complete and correct copy of the Articles of Incorporation of the Corporation filed with the West Virginia Secretary of State on March 4, 2022, and the Articles of Incorporation are in full force and effect as of the date hereof. 

2.Attached hereto as Exhibit B is a true, complete and correct copy of the Bylaws of the Corporation, as adopted by the shareholders of the Corporation, and the Bylaws are in full force and effect as of the date hereof. 

3.Attached hereto as Exhibit C is a true, complete and correct copy of the resolutions duly adopted by the shareholders of the Corporation through a Unanimous Written Consent to Corporate Action executed by all of the shareholders of the Corporation effective as of April 7, 2022, and said resolutions have not been modified, amended or rescinded, but remain in full force and effect as of the date hereof. 

4.Joseph L. Florence, Chief Operating Officer, is duly authorized to negotiate, execute and deliver, on behalf of the Corporation, all documentation necessary or desirable in connection with the loans in the aggregate principal amount of $2,610,000 made by the West Virginia Economic Development Authority to the Corporation and Kronos Advanced Technologies, Inc., a Nevada corporation.  A specimen of his signature is set opposite his name below: 





NamePositionSignature 

Joseph L. FlorenceChief Operating Officer                                    

 

 

5.No procedures are pending or contemplated for the dissolution of the Corporation. 

 

[Remainder of Page Intentionally Left Blank]


2




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have executed this Certificate as the Secretary of Kronos Advanced Technologies WV, Inc. as of the day and year first above written. 

 

___________________________________ 

Secretary 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

14774005 (1916.0939)


3





Exhibit A

 

Articles of Incorporation

 

(See Attached)





Exhibit B

 

Bylaws

 

(See Attached)





Exhibit C

 

Resolutions

 

(See Attached)
Advanced Flight Maneuvers<***) 

!JI Fly a 4 point square box clockwise and rotate the 

phantom in the direction of travel. 

, 

----- ---- -~ \ 

, \ 

~~ -- lfii~~ '~, iii1F" 

f 1111 ', 

l \ ------ -----------

~~ Fly a circle counter-clockwise and keep the aircraft 

nose pointed in the direction of travel. Be sure to keep 

the altitude the same and the circle as uniform as possible. 

-----------------------

, 

; 

.... 

m Fly a circle counter-clockwise with the aircraft nose 

pointed at the center of the circle. Be sure to keep 

the altitude the same and the circle as uniform as 

possible. 

® 
Advanced Flight Maneuvers <* * * ) 

D 

[J 

Fly a figure 8 without rotating the Phantom. Be sure to keep 

the altitude the same and the circle as uniform as possible. 

Fly a Figura 8 with the aircraft nose of the Phantom 

pointed in the direction of travel. Be sure to keep the 

altitude the same and the circle as uniform as possible. 

Fly Figure 8 pattems while e11perimenting with different orientations. 

For ex3mple, aircraft nose alway$ pointed in a given direc:tion or 

opposite/left/right the direc:tion of travel, etc:. Be sure to keep the 

altitude thesame and the c:irc:le as uniform as poasible. 
Emergency Situations 

D R•turn Hom• &: Land Mod• 

Be 5ure you are in a large open area. Before you take off, 

make aure you have a good GPS lock by enauring your LED 

indic:eton; are fle!ihing Green. Fly the Phentom et lee lit 50ft 

away from your take off point. Turn off the Remote Controller. 

The Phantom will enter it's failsafe Return-To-Home Mode. 

Let the Phantom finish it's routine end lend itself within 2 meters 

of the take off point. 

-=tsF---_._ ___ -----' 

I 

El 

• 15 meters 

lnt•rc:•pting R•tum Hom. & Land Mod• 

Be sure you ere in a large open area. Before you take off, make 

sure you have a goad GPS lock by ensuring your LED indicators 

are flashing Green. Fly the Phantom 50ft away from your take 

off paint. Turn cH the Remote Controller. The Phantom will 

enter it's failsafe Return-To-Home Made. When the Phantom 

is returning home, you can intercept RTH Mode by switching 

the Sl Switch from the top position to the middle or lower 

position, then continue flying the Phantom. 

-- ---· - . 

' 

,15 meters • 
www.dji.com 

Copyright:2014 DJIInnovations. All Rights Reserved.
PUBLIC LAW 110–205—APR. 25, 2008 122 STAT. 713 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 2903: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 154 (2008): 

Apr. 24, considered and passed House and Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 110–205 

110th Congress 

An Act 

To amend Public Law 110–196 to provide for a temporary extension of programs 

authorized by the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002 beyond 

April 25, 2008. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. ADDITIONAL TEMPORARY EXTENSION OF AGRICULTURAL 

PROGRAMS AND SUSPENSION OF PERMANENT PRICE 

SUPPORT AUTHORITIES. 

Effective April 25, 2008, section 1 of Public Law 110–196 (122 

Stat. 653) (as amended by Public Law 110–200 (122 Stat. 695)) 

is amended— 

(1) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘April 25, 2008’’ and 

inserting ‘‘May 2, 2008’’; and 

(2) in subsection (d), by striking ‘‘April 25, 2008’’ and 

inserting ‘‘May 2, 2008’’. 

Approved April 25, 2008. 

Effective date. 

Apr. 25, 2008 

[S. 2903] 


etreine on CSHP91QD1 with PUBLIC LAWS
Exhibit 10.1


 


WARRANT EXTENSION AGREEMENT  


 


This WARRANT EXTENSION AGREEMENT, dated
as of April 5, 2022 (this “Extension”), is by and between UAS Drone Corp., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”)
and those warrant holders listed on Annex A (the “Holders”).


 


W I T N E S S E T H


 


WHEREAS, the parties
hereto have heretofore entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement, dated May 11, 2021, whereby the Holders purchase certain common stock
purchase warrants (the “Warrants”); and


 


WHEREAS, the Company
and the Holders wish to amend the Warrants to extend their termination date on the terms set forth herein.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, the
parties hereto, in consideration of the mutual promises herein contained and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and
sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, hereby agree to amend the Agreement as follows:


 


1.
Definitions; References; Continuation of Agreement. Unless otherwise specified herein, each term used herein that is defined
in the Warrant shall have the meaning assigned to such term in the Warrant. Each reference to “hereof,” “hereto,”
“hereunder,” “herein” and “hereby” and each other similar reference, and each reference to “this
Warrant” and each other similar reference, contained in the Warrant shall from and after the date hereof refer to the Warrant as
amended hereby. Except as amended hereby, all terms and provisions of the Warrant shall continue unmodified and remain in full force and
effect.


 


2.
Extension. The Warrant Exercise Term is hereby amended such that the term of the warrant will be extended from eighteen
(18) months to thirty (30) months and the Warrants shall now expire on November 11, 2023.


 


3.
Counterparts. This Extension may be executed in two or more counterparts, all of which when taken together shall be considered
one and the same agreement and shall become effective when counterparts have been signed by each party and delivered to the other party,
it being understood that both parties need not sign the same counterpart.  In the event that any signature is delivered by facsimile
transmission or by e-mail delivery of a “.pdf” format data file, such signature shall create a valid and binding obligation
of the party executing (or on whose behalf such signature is executed) with the same force and effect as if such facsimile or “.pdf”
signature page were an original thereof.


 


4. Governing
Law. This Extension shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of New York.


 


[signature page follows]


 






     


     


    

 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties
hereto have caused this Extension to be duly executed on the date first above written.


 


	 	UAS DRONE CORP. 
	 	 
	 	By:	    
	 	Name:	Yossef Balucka
	 	Title:	CEO


 


[signature page continues]


 






     


     


    

 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties
hereto have caused this Extension to be duly executed on the date first above written.


 


	 	
    HOLDER:

	 	 
	 	By:	              
	 	Name:	 
	 	Title:
#### Worcester Royal Porcelain Co., Inc. *v.*United States

No. 7595.

Entry No. 714216.

Pro forma invoice dated London, England, May 1946.

Entered at New York, N. Y., August 16, 1946.

(Decided June 8, 1948)

*Fred Bennett*for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Lawrence, Judge:

It has been agreed between the parties hereto that the issues herein relating to the above-mentioned merchandise are the same in all material respects as those decided in *United States*v. Wm. *S. Pitcairn Corp.,*33 C. C. P. A. (Customs) 183, C. A. D. 334, and that the record therein may be incorporated herein.

Upon the agreed facts I find the export value, as defined in section 402 (d), Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for determining the values of said merchandise, and that such values are the appraised values, less additions made by importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-91,228-01

EX PARTE CHRISTOPHER JAMES DORN, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 25,709-A IN THE 258TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM POLK COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Applicant pled guilty to aggravated kidnapping under a plea agreement for a fifteen-year

prison sentence. There was no direct appeal. Applicant filed a pro se application for a writ of habeas

corpus alleging that his guilty plea was not voluntary. The trial court entered an order designating

issues and appointed habeas counsel, who filed an amended habeas application. Applicant says the

victim has been making statements to others that removes or lessens Applicant’s culpability, he

presents an exculpatory affidavit from a co-defendant, and he says he did not understand that he had

a possible defense to the kidnapping charge. The trial court has set several dates for an evidentiary

hearing but has had to continue the settings. The district clerk properly forwarded the habeas

application to this Court. See TEX. R. APP. PROC. 73.4(b)(5).
2

Regarding his claim about counsel, Applicant says that he “did not understand at the time of

his plea, if he was forced to assist in a criminal act for fear of his own personal safety in addition to

being verbally threatened and physically assaulted, that it amounts to ‘duress’ and therefore not held

accountable for such criminal acts” (emphasis in original). The affidavit habeas counsel submitted

from a co-defendant supports Applicant’s account of duress, and habeas counsel details her own

unsuccessful efforts to contact the victim. There is no response from trial counsel regarding his

discussions with Applicant about the facts of the offense and possible defenses, and there are no

findings from the trial court resolving the disputed factual issues it designated. 

Accordingly, the record should be developed. The trial court is the appropriate forum for

findings of fact. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d). The trial court shall order trial counsel

to respond to Applicant’s claims that Applicant’s guilty plea was involuntary. In developing the

record, the trial court may use any means set out in Article 11.07, § 3(d). The trial court shall then

make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether Applicant’s plea was involuntary. The

trial court may make any other findings and conclusions that it deems appropriate.

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law within ninety days from

the date of this order. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the trial court’s

findings and conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other things,

affidavits, motions, objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts from

hearings and depositions. See TEX.R. APP. P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be requested

by the trial court and obtained from this Court. 

Filed: December 16, 2020

Do not publish
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

Allen Barber, on behalf of himself and

those similarly situated,

Plaintiff

 v.

Premier Delivery Services, Inc. and

Premier Courier, Inc.,

Defendants

:

:

:

:

:

Civil Action 2:13-cv-00001

Judge Marbley

Magistrate Judge Abel

ORDER

The January 10, 2013 application of Ashley Lindenmier to appear pro hac vice as cocounsel for plaintiff Allen Barber (doc. 2) is GRANTED on the condition that, within 15

days of the date of this Order, counsel register for electronic filing. S.D. Ohio Civ. Rule

83.5(b). Counsel should register on-line: 

http://www.ohsd.uscourts.gov/cmecfreg.htm 

A log-on and password for electronic filing will be sent out the next business day. The

Court will serve all notices and orders on counsel electronically. Additional information

about electronic filing may be found at the Court’s website:

 http://www.ohsd.uscourts.gov/cmecf.htm 

If counsel experiences any problems registering, she should call Lisa Wright (614-719-3222). 

s/Mark R. Abel 

United States Magistrate Judge

Case: 2:13-cv-00001-ALM-MRA Doc #: 4 Filed: 01/15/13 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Order entered January 3, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-00727-CR

JOHN EDWARD WILLIAMS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 416th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 416-83246-2017

ORDER

The State’s second motion for an extension of time to file its brief is GRANTED, and the 

State’s tendered brief is hereby ordered filed in the above cause. 

/s/ LANA MYERS 

PRESIDING JUSTICE