alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications.

 

 

I, Anthony Sfarra, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports onForm 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report onForm 10-K of the Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Trust 2016-NXS5 (the"Exchange Act periodic reports");

 

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, takenas a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing andother information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the periodcovered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statementsrequired in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except asdisclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilledtheir obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and

 

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteriafor asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessmentof compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required tobe included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB andExchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to thisreport, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances ofnoncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report onForm 10-K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied oninformation provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:

 

Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as Special Servicer, WilmingtonTrust, National Association, as Trustee, Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, asOperating Advisor, CoreLogic Solutions, LLC, as Servicing Function Participant,Computershare Trust Company, National Association, as Servicing FunctionParticipant for the Certificate Administrator, Computershare Trust Company,National Association, as Servicing Function Participant for the Custodian,Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as Special Servicer for the 10 South LaSalleStreet Mortgage Loan, Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee forthe 10 South LaSalle Street Mortgage Loan, Pentalpha Surveillance LLC, asOperating Advisor for the 10 South LaSalle Street Mortgage Loan, CoreLogicSolutions, LLC, as Servicing Function Participant for the 10 South LaSalleStreet Mortgage Loan, and Computershare Trust Company, National Association, asServicing Function Participant for the Custodian for the 10 South LaSalleStreet Mortgage Loan.

 

 

 

Dated:March 17,2023

 

 

/s/ Anthony Sfarra

Anthony Sfarra 

President

(seniorofficer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
**Certification of the Chief Financial OfficerPursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)**

I, Frederic F. Brace, the Executive Vice President and Chief FinancialOfficer of United Air Lines, Inc. (the "Company") certify that to the bestof my knowledge, based upon a review of the quarterly report on Form 10-Qfor the period ended March 31, 2004 of the Company (the "Report"):(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofthe Company. /s/ Frederic F. BraceFrederic F. BraceUnited Air Lines, Inc.Executive Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerApril 30, 2004
UGI UTILITIES INC.
COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES  EXHIBIT 12.1
(Thousands of dollars)
 ThreeMonthsEndedDecember 31,
    
    
    Year Ended September 30,2010
    
    
    2010
    
    
    2009
    
    
    2008
    
    
    2007
    
    
    2006Earnings:Earnings before income taxes
    
    $
    68,247
    
    
    $
    147,183
    
    
    $
    125,554
    
    
    $
    123,977
    
    
    $
    122,766
    
    
    $
    80,544Interest expense
    
    
    10,633
    
    
    
    42,336
    
    
    
    43,918
    
    
    
    39,065
    
    
    
    42,327
    
    
    
    24,102Amortization of debt discount and expense
    
    
    122
    
    
    
    627
    
    
    
    625
    
    
    
    467
    
    
    
    462
    
    
    
    243Estimated interest component of rental expense
    
    
    466
    
    
    
    1,912
    
    
    
    1,965
    
    
    
    1,619
    
    
    
    1,506
    
    
    
    1,675$
    79,468
    
    
    $
    192,058
    
    
    $
    172,062
    
    
    $
    165,128
    
    
    $
    167,061
    
    
    $
    106,564Fixed Charges:Interest expense
    
    $
    10,633
    
    
    $
    42,336
    
    
    $
    43,918
    
    
    $
    39,065
    
    
    $
    42,327
    
    
    $
    24,102Amortization of debt discount and expense
    
    
    122
    
    
    
    627
    
    
    
    625
    
    
    
    467
    
    
    
    462
    
    
    
    243Allowance for funds used during
construction (capitalized interest)
    
    
    12
    
    
    
    35
    
    
    
    160
    
    
    
    139
    
    
    
    179
    
    
    
    85Estimated interest component of rental expense
    
    
    466
    
    
    
    1,912
    
    
    
    1,965
    
    
    
    1,619
    
    
    
    1,506
    
    
    
    1,675$
    11,233
    
    
    $
    44,910
    
    
    $
    46,668
    
    
    $
    41,290
    
    
    $
    44,474
    
    
    $
    26,105Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
    
    
    7.07
    
    
    
    4.28
    
    
    
    3.69
    
    
    
    4.00
    
    
    
    3.76
    
    
    
    4.08
<PAGE>   1
                       UGI UTILITIES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
        COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES - EXHIBIT 12.1
                             (THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                      Three
                                                      Months
                                                      Ended                             Year Ended September 30,
                                                    December 31,     ---------------------------------------------------
                                                      2000           2000           1999           1998           1997
                                                      ----           ----           ----           ----           ----
<S>                                                <C>             <C>            <C>            <C>            <C>
EARNINGS:
Earnings before income taxes                       $ 28,358        $  82,882      $ 63,139       $ 57,007       $ 63,275
Interest expense                                      5,054           18,135        17,317         17,383         16,696
Amortization of debt discount and expense                51              218           215            200            176
Interest component of rental expense                    328            1,318         1,539          1,624          1,887
                                                   --------        ---------      --------       --------       --------
                                                   $ 33,791        $ 102,553      $ 82,210       $ 76,214       $ 82,034
                                                   ========        =========      ========       ========       ========

FIXED CHARGES:
Interest expense                                   $  5,054         $ 18,135      $ 17,317       $ 17,383       $ 16,696
Amortization of debt discount and expense                51              218           215            200            176
Allowance for funds used during
      construction (capitalized interest)                 7               17            36             39            114
Interest component of rental expense                    328            1,318         1,539          1,624          1,887
                                                   --------        ---------      --------       --------       --------
                                                   $  5,440        $  19,688      $ 19,107       $ 19,246       $ 18,873
                                                   ========        =========      ========       ========       ========

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                     6.21             5.21          4.30           3.96           4.35
                                                   ========        =========      ========       ========       ========
</TABLE>
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Commercial Mortgage  Servicing**D1050-084, 8th Fl  401 South Tryon Street  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|--------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

Reference is hereby made tothat certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of April 1, 2016, by andamong DEUTSCHE MORTGAGE & ASSET RECEIVING CORPORATION, as Depositor, WELLSFARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, MIDLAND LOAN SERVICES, ADIVISION OF PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Special Servicer, WILMINGTONTRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONALASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator, Paying Agent and Custodian and PARKBRIDGE LENDER SERVICES LLC, as Operating Advisor and Asset RepresentationsReviewer with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series2016-C1 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein nototherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 10.11 ofthis Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of CommercialMortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1. A review of the activitiesof the Master Servicer during the period from April 1, 2016 through December 31,2016 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance per theAgreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and 

 

2. To the best of myknowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of itsobligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, theundersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2017.

 

/s/ Daniel Bober

Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President

Wells Fargo Bank

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll  go far |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------|
### SERVED : JUL Y 14,201 1 U.S . DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N

OFFIC EO FHEARING S WASHINGTON , D C . I N TH EMATTERO F DIAMON D AIRCHARTER , INC .

• FAA DOCKE T NO . CPI0EA000 4 (Civi l Penall y Action ) FDM S NO . FAA-2010-062 0 

### DEPARTMEN TO F •ANSPORTATiO N TR/ ^ POCKE TOPERATION S 20! ! .JU L |L | P 9 : i U



### ORDE RI^ASSIGNIN GPROCEEDIN G I nihc interes t

o f judicia l efficiency , th e above-caplione dproceedin g i s reassigne dfro m Chie f Administrativ e La

w Judg e Ronni e A . Yodc r to Administrativ e La

w Judg e Jcsly nE . Sullivan . All futur

e pleading s an dothe r

communication s regardin g this proceedin g shal l b e serve do nth e Judge , th e FA

A Hearin g Docket , an dth e othe r person s onth e attache dServic e List . S O ORDERED .

Lonni e A . Y Chie f Administrati Attachment

- Servic e Lis tFA A Docke t No . CPIOEA000 4 (Civi l Penall y Action ) REVISE D SERVIC ELIS T ORIGINA L& ON ECOP Y Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W . Washington , D C 2059 1 Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-43 0 Wilbu r Wrigh t Buildin g - Suil e 2W1000 '

ON ECOP Y Gregor y S . Winlon , Responden t s Counse l Aviatio nLa w Experts , LL C On e Researc hCourt , Suit e 45 0 Rockvillc,M D 2085 0 TEL ; 301-294-855 0 FAX : 301-294-252 5 Zachar y M . Berman , Complainant' s Counse l AUoniey , OfUc c o f

th e Regiona l Counsel , AEA- 7 Easter nRegio n Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 1 Aviatio n Plaza . Roo m 56 1 Jamaica , N Y 1143 4 TEL : 718-553-325 8 FAX : 718-995-569 9 Th e Honorabl e Jcsly n E . Sullivan , • Administrativ e La w Judg e U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n Offic e o f Hearings , M-20 , Roo mE l 2-32 0 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E . Washington , D C 2059 0 TEL : 202-366-213 2 FAX : 202-366-753 6

' Service wa

s b y U.S . Mail . Fo

r servic e i n perso n o r b y cxpediledcourier, use th

e followin g address : Federa

l Aviatio n Administration , 60

0 Independence Avenue , S.W. , Wilbu r Wrigh t Buildin g - Suit e 2W1000 . Washington , D C 20591 ; Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk . AGC-430 . - 2 -
SISKIYOU

DOUGLAS

TRINITY

LANE

HUMBOLDT

JACKSON

SHASTA

COOS

MENDOCINO

TEHAMA

LAKE

CURRY

KLAMATH

GLENN

SONOMA

JOSEPHINE

NAPA

COLUSA

YOLO

DEL NORTE

MARIN

SOLANO

ALAMEDA

CONTRA COSTA

SAN MATEO

BUTTE

SANTA CLARA

DESCHUTES

SAN FRANCISCO

SUTTER

 ̄ 0 6 12 18 24 3

Nautical Miles

ATTENTION USER: This map is a product of the Minerals Management Service (MMS),

which is an agency of the U.S. Department of the Interior. The mission of MMS

is to manage the mineral resources of the Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) in an 

environmentally sound and safe manner and to timely collect, verify and distribute

mineral revenues from Federal and Indian lands. 

The MMS does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of this map nor assume any

reponsibility or liability for any reliance action. This map is not intended for use as

a navigational tool nor as a legal document for Federal leasing purposes.

Programmatic EIS for Outer Continental Shelf Renewable Energy and Alternate Use

Not For Navigational Use

Northern California OCS Planning Area

Current Uses on the Outer Continental Shelf

60

120

200

400

600 800

100

120

140

160

180

Federal

Boundary

-

S

at

et

Scale: 1:810,000

Oregon

Redwood

National and 

State Parks

Legend

Federal - State Boundary

Bathymetric Contour (feet)

National Marine Sanctuary

OCS Planning Area

Area of Special Biological Significance

National Wildlife Refuge

National Park

Military Warning Zone

County

2508

3065

Upper Klamath

National Wildlife

Refuge

California

Humbodt

Bay

National 

Wildlife

Refuge

San

Pablo

Bay

National 

Wildlife

Refuge

Willow Creek

- Lurline

National 

Wildlife

Management

Area

Sacramento

River

National

Wildlife

Refuge

Brandon Marsh

National Wildlife Refuge

K i n g s

R a n g e

N a t i o a n l

C o n s e r v a t i o n

A r e a

A r e a

o f

S p e c i a l

B i o l o g i c a l

S i g n i f i c a n c e

100

200

300

400

5

0

0
# C_2016326EN.01001902.xml

| 5.9.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.9.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/19

---

Order of the President of the Fourth Chamber of the Court of 30 May 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Centrale Raad van Beroep — Nederlands) — J. Klinkenberg v Minister van Infrastructuur en Milieu

(Case C-343/15) (1)

1

(2016/C 326/32)

Language of the case: Dutch

The President of the Fourth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 311, 21.9.2015.

1

---
#### Inter-Maritime Fwdg. Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States

No. 6744.

Entry No. 726198, etc.

Invoices dated Hawick, Scotland, September 24, 1941, etc.

Certified September 25, 1941, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., November 24, 1941, etc.

(Decided January 13, 1947)

*Tompkins & Tompkins*for the plaintiffs.

*Paul P. Bao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Ouveb, Presiding Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted_for decision upon . the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Taiiff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of' the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importers on entry because of advances by" the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly,
No. 56152.

protest 174836-K (New York).

#### Universal Sales Service Associates, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

The case was dismissed by order of the court.
Before the Second Division,

December 11, 1951

No. 56163.

protest 171871-K (New York).

#### Delmark Watch Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

It was stipulated that the items of merchandise in question consist of watch movements similar in all material respects' to those which were the subject of *United States*v. *Helbros Watch Co. et al.*(38 C. C. P. A. 1, C. A. D. 430). Upon the agreed statement of facts and the cited authority, the merchandise was held properly dutiable at the base rate of 90 cents each as watch movements more than 1 inch but less than 1.77 inches wide under paragraph 367 (a) (1), as modified, *supra.*
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)



Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of United Refining Company, a Pennsylvania corporation (the Company), does
hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:



The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended February 28, 2010 (the Form 10-Q) of the Company
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

|                      |  |  |  |     |  |                          |  |                                            
|--------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ------------------------ |  | -------------------------------------------
|                      |  |  | 
|Dated: April 14, 2010 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ John A. Catsimatidis
|                      |  |  |  |     |  |                          |  | John A. Catsimatidis                       
|                      |  |  |  |     |  |                          |  | Principal Executive Officer                
|                      |  |  | 
|Dated: April 14, 2010 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ James E. Murphy     
|                      |  |  |  |     |  |                          |  | James E. Murphy
Principal Financial Officer
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v CHARLES S. ALSTON, Private E-1, U. S. Army, Appellant

8 USCMA 490, 24 CMR 300

No. 10,243

Decided December 13, 1957

*First Lieutenant Jerome H. Gerber*and *First Lieutenant Lawrence R. Fullem*were on the brief for Appellant, Accused.

*Captain Thomas J. Nichols*and *First Lieutenant Jay D. Fischer*were on the brief for Appellee, United States.

Opinion of the Court

Homer Ferguson, Judge:

Appellant, Private E-l Charles S. Alston, pleaded not guilty to, but was convicted of, desertion, terminated by apprehension, and assault and battery, in violation of Articles 85 and 128, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC §§ 885 and 928, respectively. He seeks reversal of the desertion offense on the basis of the law officer’s instruction, which advised the court that:

> “As to length of absence without authority, it is within the province of the court to determine whether or not the length of time involved, if in the absence of satisfactory explanation, is of sufficient duration from which it can infer an intent to remain away permanently. You must determine whether or not the absence was much prolonged, and if so, whether or not there was a satisfactory explanation for it.”

A similar instruction was held to constitute reversible error in the case of United States v Soccio, 8 USCMA 477, 24 CMR 287. Simply stated, theré are two vices present in such an instruction. First, it emphasizes one fact to the exclusion of others, viz., the length *491of the accused’s absence, thus permitting the court-martial to find the accused guilty of desertion without reference to the other evidence adduced at trial. Secondly, it permits the court to infer an intent to remain away permanently from the length of the accused’s absence, in the absence of a “satisfactory” explanation, thus shifting the burden of proof from, the Government to the accused. Accordingly, the decision of the board of review is reversed. The record is returned to The Judge Advocate General of the Army for reference to a board of review. -The board, in its discretion, may approve the lesser offense of absence without leave and reassess the entire sentence on that basis, together with the remaining approved finding of guilt, or it may, in the alternative, order a rehearing on the desertion charge.

Chief Judge Quinn concurs.

LatimeR, Judge

(dissenting):

I dissent for the reasons set forth in my separate opinion in United States v Soccio, 8 USCMA 477, 24 CMR 287;