alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2017078EN.01002901.xml

| 13.3.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 78/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.3.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 78/29

---

Judgment of the General Court of 2 February 2017 — Marcas Costa Brava v EUIPO — Excellent Brands JMI (Cremcaffé by Julius Meinl)

(Case T-691/15) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative mark Cremcaffé by Julius Meinl - Earlier EU figurative mark café crem - Relative ground for refusal - Lack of genuine use of the earlier mark - Article 42(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2017/C 078/39)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Marcas Costa Brava, SL (Sils, Spain) (represented by: E. Manresa Medina and J. Manresa Medina, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Fischer, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Excellent Brands JMI Ltd (Baar, Switzerland) (represented by: D. Majer, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 29 September 2015 (Case R 2756/2014-5), relating to opposition proceedings between Marcas Costa Brava and Excellent Brands JMI.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Marcas Costa Brava, SL, to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Marcas Costa Brava, SL, to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 48, 8.2.2016.

1

---
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 177 

Expressing the sense of the Congress concerning contraceptives for women. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 27, 2007 

Mrs. LOWEY submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred 

to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the Congress concerning 

contraceptives for women. 

Whereas the United States has one of the highest rates of 

abortion in the industrialized world, with American 

women experiencing 1.3 million abortions every year; 

Whereas behind almost every abortion in the United States 

is an unintended pregnancy, therefore, efforts to reduce 

unintended pregnancy will reduce the number of abortions; 

Whereas the most effective way to prevent unintended pregnancy is to improve access to safe, affordable, effective 

contraceptive methods and to provide medically accurate 

information about how to use such methods; 

Whereas contraceptive use has declined slightly among all 

women and precipitously among low-income women and, 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
2 

•HCON 177 IH 

as a result, unplanned pregnancy rates have risen among 

low-income women by 30 percent; 

Whereas a low-income woman today is 4 times as likely to 

have an unintended pregnancy and more than 4 times as 

likely to have an abortion as her higher-income counterpart; 

Whereas abortion rates have increased among low-income 

women, even as they have continued to decrease among 

more affluent women; 

Whereas the United States has established as a public health 

goal for the Nation to reduce the proportion of pregnancies that are unintended by 40 percent by 2010, and 

achieving this goal would reduce the annual number of 

abortions from 1,300,000 to 780,000; and 

Whereas the United States has an impressive capacity for 

marshaling the resources necessary to tackle pressing 

public health problems such as smoking, and the same 

should be done for the problem of unintended pregnancy 

by ensuring universal access to effective and affordable 

contraception: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That the Congress— 

3 (1) supports a major, national campaign to help 

4 all women, regardless of income, avoid unintended 

5 pregnancy and abortion through access to contracep6 tion; and 

7 (2) supports programs and policies that make it 

8 easier for all women not only to obtain contracepVerDate Aug 31 2005 06:13 Jun 28, 2007 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\HC177.IH HC177

bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
3 

•HCON 177 IH 

1 tives but also to use them consistently and correctly 

2 over time. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                           UT
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1998
<BOOK-VALUE>                                   PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      1,227,527
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                    35,561
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         196,648
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                       330,979
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,790,715
<COMMON>                                       281,559
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      (204)
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            172,506
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 453,861
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    4,299
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           564,641
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                             0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                      113,195
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                 0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                  74,574
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                      0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                    16,596
<LEASES-CURRENT>                               345
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 563,204
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  1,790,715
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      520,867
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                           47,128
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     392,426
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     439,554
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        81,313
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                             1,524
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 82,837
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       38,533
<NET-INCOME>                                   40,695
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                    151
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                  40,565
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                       30,284
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                      39,718
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         57,969
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  2.90
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  2.89
        

</TABLE>
# C_2016027EN.01007801.xml

| 25.1.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 27/78 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.1.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 27/78

---

Action brought on 2 November 2015 — ZZ v Parliament

(Case F-138/15)

(2016/C 027/100)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: T. Bontinck and A. Guillerme, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Parliament

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision to terminate the applicant’s contract of employment and claim for damages in respect of the non-material damage allegedly suffered.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision dated 19 December 2014 to terminate the applicant’s contract of employment; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision dated 19 December 2014 to terminate the applicant’s contract of employment;

| — | order the European Parliament to compensate the applicant for the non-material damage suffered, assessed provisionally on an ex aequo et bono basis at EUR 20 000; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the European Parliament to compensate the applicant for the non-material damage suffered, assessed provisionally on an ex aequo et bono basis at EUR 20 000;

ex aequo et bono

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs

---
**EXHIBIT
32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO**


**18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





Each of
the undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as an officer of 21st Century
Insurance Group (the “Company”), for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
best of his knowledge:





·
    the
      Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended March
      31, 2005, (the “Report”), which this certification accompanies, fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and





·
    the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Dated:
April 21, 2005





/s/ Bruce W. MarlowBruce W. MarlowPresident and Chief Executive Officer





/s/ Lawrence P. BascomLawrence P. BascomSr. Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
----

Removal from the register of Case C-58/05 (1)

(2006/C 60/67)

Language of the case: Swedish

By order of 22 November 2005, the President of the Court of Justice of the European Communities has ordered the removal from the register of Case C-58/05: Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Sweden.

----

(1)OJ C 93 of 16.04.2005.

----
(Reap. Dec. 10260)

#### Frank P. Dow Co., Inc., for Account Uni Importing Co. et al. v. United States

Entry No. 29772, etc.

(Decided May 15, 1962)

*Lawrence & Tuttle (Edward N. Glad*of counsel) for the plaintiffs.

*William H. Orriclc, Jr.,*Assistant Attorney General *(James F. O’Hara,*trial attorney), for the defendant.

Donlon, Judge:

At the term of court in Los Angeles on February 14, 1962, these cases were consolidated. Counsel stipulated, in open court, that the merchandise, covered by the entries in these appeals for reappraisement, was entered after February 27,1958, and was not on the final list published by the Secretary of the Treasury, T.D. *66554521, under section 6(a) of tbe Customs Simplification Act of 1956, 70 Stat. 943, T.D. 54165. The cases were submitted on a further stipulation of record, as follows:

> Mr. Glad : I offer to stipulate that the merchandise consists of rubber goods manufactured by Kohkoku Chemical Industry Co., Ltd., exported from Japan during 1959 and 1960, and that * * *.

> *******

> * * * the freely offered price for such or similar merchandise during the period in question, for export to the United States, in the principal market in Japan, is represented by the unit invoice values, net packed, and that there is no higher foreign value for such or similar merchandise.

> Mr. O’Hara: Based on information supplied by customs examiner Clifford of this port, who is in court, the Government so stipulates.

Accepting these stipulations as an agreed statement of facts, I find and hold that export value, as defined in section 402(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, *sufra,*is the proper basis for determination of the value of the rubber goods manufactured by Kohkoku Chemical Industry Co., Ltd., covered by the invoices and entries in these appeals for reappraisement, and that such values of the said items of merchandise are the respective invoice unit values, net, packed, as shown on the invoices which are included in the official papers filed with the court in the several suits.

As to all other merchandise, these appeals are dismissed.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
```

[110th Congress Public Law 192]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ192.110]

[[Page 121 STAT. 648]]

Public Law 110-192
110th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To provide for the continued minting and issuance of certain $1 coins in 
              2008. <<NOTE: Feb. 29, 2008 -  [H.R. 5478]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress <<NOTE: 31 USC 5112 
note.>> assembled, That clause (i) of section 5112(n)(1)(B) of title 31, 
United States Code (as in effect on the day before the date of the 
enactment of Public Law 110-82) shall continue in effect, 
notwithstanding the amendment made by section 3 of Public Law 110-82, 
until the effective date of the amendment made by section 2 of such 
Public Law.

    Approved February 29, 2008.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 5478:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 154 (2008):
            Feb. 25, considered and passed House.
            Feb. 28, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
# C_2017277EN.01003501.xml

| 21.8.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 277/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.8.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 277/35

---

Judgment of the General Court of 28 June 2017 — Josel v EUIPO — Nationale-Nederlanden Nederland (NN)

(Case T-333/15) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - International registration designating the European Union - Word mark NN - Earlier national word mark NN - Relative ground for refusal - Lack of genuine use of the earlier mark - Articles 15(1)(a) and 42(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Form differing by elements altering the distinctive character))

(2017/C 277/51)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Josel, SL (Barcelona, Spain) (represented: initially by J.L. Rivas Zurdo, and subsequently by J. Güell Serra, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Gája, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Nationale-Nederlanden Nederland BV (The Hague, Netherlands) (represented: initially by E. Morée and A. Janssen, and subsequently by A. Janssen, R. Sjoerdsma and C. Jehoram, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 14 April 2015 (Case R 1531/2014-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Josel and Nationale-Nederlanden Nederland.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the applicant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the applicant to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 262, 10.8.2015.

1

---
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Gil LEON-PAZ, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 04-10312.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted April 13, 2005.

Decided May 3, 2005.

Raquel Arellano, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney Evo A. Deconcini, Tucson, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Saul M. Huerta, Jr., Esq., Federal Public Defender’s Office, Tucson, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: LAY,* B. FLETCHER, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.

*

 The Honorable Donald P. Lay, Senior United States Circuit Judge for the Eighth Circuit, sitting by designation.

MEMORANDUM **

Gil Leon-Paz (“Leon-Paz”), a Mexican citizen convicted, pursuant to his conditional guilty plea, of reentry of a removed alien, collaterally attacks the removal order upon which his prosecution was based. He argues that the immigration judge’s erroneous statement in the removal hearing that no relief was available (earlier determined by this court to be a due pro*5cess violation) prejudiced him, as he could have applied for an INA § 212(c) waiver, and had at least a plausible case for such relief. The district court, on remand, found no prejudice.

In light of the evidence of Leon-Paz’s expert regarding former clients who, in the relevant time period, were granted such relief, three of whom had fewer relatives within the United States and had committed more egregious crimes than Leon-Paz, we conclude that Leon-Paz had a plausible case for relief, even under the heightened “unusual or outstanding equities” standard applicable to individuals with serious criminal histories. He has, accordingly, established prejudice. We therefore reverse and direct the district court to vacate Leon-Paz’s conviction and sentence and dismiss the indictment.

REVERSED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 204 

Expressing the sense of the Congress that States and local political subdivisions are not preempted from the enactment and enforcement of immigration-related laws and ordinances that do not directly conflict with 

Federal immigration laws. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 5, 2007 

Mr. MARCHANT submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the Congress that States and local 

political subdivisions are not preempted from the enactment and enforcement of immigration-related laws and 

ordinances that do not directly conflict with Federal immigration laws. 

Whereas the city of Farmers Branch, Texas, held a referendum in May 2007 to deal with the issue of illegal immigration in the city; 

Whereas the voters of the city of Farmers Branch, Texas, 

overwhelmingly approved the referendum to address the 

issue of illegal immigration in the city; 

Whereas after the approval of this ordinance the city has had 

eight separate lawsuits filed against it; 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•HCON 204 IH 

Whereas the city has expended nearly $500,000 in legal fees 

that will likely increase when the city will need to retain 

a large outside firm or firms to direct the litigation; 

Whereas the primary legal question is whether the total field 

of immigration has been preempted by the Congress; and 

Whereas nothing in the current Federal law expressly and directly addresses the issue of field preemption and the role 

of State and local governments: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that 

3 States and local political subdivisions are not preempted 

4 from the enactment and enforcement of immigration-re5 lated laws and ordinances that do not directly conflict with 

6 Federal immigration laws. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 

          - [Docket No. CP00-451-001] 

Take notice that on April 2, 2007, Texas-Ohio Pipeline, Inc., (Texas-Ohio) tendered for filing its Notice of Cancellation of FERC Gas Tariff, pursuant to the Commission's October 17, 2000 Order in this proceeding. 

Any person desiring to protest this filing must file in accordance with Rule 211 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211). Protests to this filing will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Such protests must be filed on or before the date as indicated below. Anyone filing a protest must serve a copy of that document on all the parties to the proceeding. 

                    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests in lieu of paper using the “eFiling” link at                     *http://www.ferc.gov.*                     Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 14 copies of the protest to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.                 

                    This filing is accessible on-line at                     *http://www.ferc.gov*, using the “eLibrary” link and is available for review in the Commission's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an “eSubscription” link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail                     *FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov*, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.                 

*Comment Date:*                     5 p.m. Eastern Time on May 3, 2007.                 

Kimberly D. Bose, 

Secretary.

[FR Doc. E7-7858 Filed 4-24-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
No. 43087.

#### Protest 8689-K of R. L. Albert & Son, Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Evans, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of baked articles the same as those the subject of *Renken*v. *United States*(1 Cust. Ct. 309, C. D. 73). The claim at 20 percent under paragraph 1558 was therefore sustained.