alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 81 (Friday, April 27, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21048-21049]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-8057]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service


Notice of Establishment of the Sand Creek Massacre National 
Historic Site

AGENCY: National Park Service.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under Public Law 106-465, the Sand Creek Massacre Site 
Establishment Act of 2000, the Secretary of the Interior hereby 
announces that sufficient lands have been acquired to establish the 
Sand Creek Massacre National Historic Site in Kiowa County, Colorado. 
Public Law 106-465 called for the Secretary of the Interior to 
establish the Sand Creek Massacre National Historic Site once the 
Secretary had determined that sufficient lands had been acquired by the 
federal government to provide for the preservation, memorialization, 
commemoration, and interpretation of the Sand Creek Massacre. The Act 
authorized the National Park Service to acquire up to 12,500 acres from 
willing sellers for this purpose. Between 2002 and 2004 the United 
States acquired 920 acres within the authorized boundaries. On 
September 9, 2006, pursuant to Public Law 109-45, the Sand Creek 
Massacre National Historic Site Trust Act of 2005, the Cheyenne and 
Arapaho Tribes of Oklahoma conveyed to the United States title to 1465 
acres within the authorized boundaries to be held in trust for the 
purposes of the Sand Creek Massacre National Historic Site. With this 
conveyance, the United States has acquired a sufficient amount of the 
nationally significant resources that are integral to the preservation, 
commemoration and interpretation of the Sand Creek Massacre.

DATES: This action is effective April 27, 2007.

ADDRESSES: Requests for information should be sent to Sand Creek 
Massacre National Historic Site. P.O. Box 249, Eads, Colorado 81036.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alexa Roberts, Superintendent, Sand 
Creek Massacre National Historic Site. P.O. Box 249, Eads, Colorado, 
81036.


[[Page 21049]]


    Dated: April 23, 2007.
Dirk Kempthorne,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-8057 Filed 4-26-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-P
# C_2016048EN.01001301.xml

| 8.2.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 48/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.2.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 48/13

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Netherlands) lodged on 16 November 2015 — Staatssecretaris van Financiën; Other party: Lemnis Lighting BV

(Case C-600/15)

(2016/C 048/20)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Referring court

Hoge Raad der Nederlanden

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant in cassation: Staatssecretaris van Financiën

Appellant in cassation:

Other party: Lemnis Lighting BV

Other party:

Question referred

Question referred

Are headings 8539, 8541, 8543, 8548 and 9405 of the CN to be interpreted as meaning that products such as LED bulbs, which consist of light-emitting diodes and other electrical components, as well as a glass covering and an Edison screw base, and which serve to provide illumination after being fitted into a lighting fitting, must be classified under one of those headings? If so, under which of those headings are those products to be classified? If not, under which other heading must classification then be made?

---
| (logo) ncb

National Coopoerative Bank | 2011 Crystal Drive

Suite, 8oo  Arlington, Virginia 22202 |
|----------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

**FORM OF ANNUAL COMPLIANCE STATEMENT**

 

 

CERTIFICATION

 

 

Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Trust 2016-C33,Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2016-C33 (the “Trust”)

 

 

I, Karyn Mann, onbehalf of National Cooperative Bank, N.A., as NCB Special Servicer (the “CertifyingServicer”), certify to Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Securities,Inc. and its officers, directors and affiliates, and with the knowledge andintent that they will rely upon this certification,that:

 

1.      I (or Servicing Officers under my supervision) havereviewed the Certifying Servicer’s activities during the precedingcalendar year between January 1, 2016 and December 31, 2016 (the “ReportingPeriod”) and the Certifying Servicer’s performance under thePooling and Servicing Agreement;and

 

2.      To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, theCertifying Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Pooling andServicing Agreement in all material respects during the ReportingPeriod.

 

 

Date:  February 6, 2017

 

 

National Cooperative Bank, N.A., 

as NCB Special Servicer

 

 

/s/By: Karyn MannName: Karyn Mann

Title:Senior Vice President
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-50932 

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ARMANDO VALADEZ, JR.,

also known as Armando Valdez, Jr.,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. W-96-CR-35-1

- - - - - - - - - -

February 20, 1998

Before JONES, SMITH and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Counsel was appointed by this court to assist Armando

Valadez, Jr., in challenging the district court’s determination

that any appeal would be frivolous, thus denying Valadez leave to

proceed on appeal in forma pauperis (IFP). Court-appointed

counsel has moved to withdraw pursuant to Anders v. California,

386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of counsel’s briefs,

Valadez’s responses, and the record discloses no nonfrivolous
No. 96-50932 

-2-

issue. Accordingly, counsel is excused from further

responsibilities herein, Valadez’s motion for leave to proceed

IFP is DENIED, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R.

42.2.

IFP DENIED. APPEAL DISMISSED.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 82 (Monday, April 30, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 21284]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-8134]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Indian Affairs


Indian Gaming

AGENCY: Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of Amendment to Approved Tribal-State Compact.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice publishes the approval of the extension of 
agreement between the Northern Cheyenne Tribe and the State of Montana 
concerning Class III gaming, with the incorporated amendments.

EFFECTIVE DATE: April 30, 2007.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: George T. Skibine, Director, Office of 
Indian Gaming, Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary--Policy and 
Economic Development, Washington, DC 20240, (202) 219-4066.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to Section 11 of the Indian Gaming 
Regulatory Act of 1988 (IGRA), Public Law 100-497, 25 U.S.C. 2710, the 
Secretary of the Interior shall publish in the Federal Register notice 
of the approved Tribal-State compacts for the purpose of engaging in 
Class III gaming activities on Indian lands.
    This amendment extends the term of the compact for 10 years, 
increases the number of gaming machines, the maximum jackpot on gaming 
machines and the prize limit on Class III poker, for the Northern 
Cheyenne Tribe.

    Dated: April 19, 2007.
Carl J. Artman,
Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs.
 [FR Doc. E7-8134 Filed 4-27-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-02-P
# C_2015320EN.01005302.xml

| 28.9.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 320/53 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.9.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 320/53

---

Action brought on 23 July 2015 — ZZ v EESC

(Case F-107/15)

(2015/C 320/74)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: M.-A. Lucas, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: EESC (European Economic and Social Committee)

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Application for annulment of the decision retiring the applicant with effect as of 31 December 2014 and the decision rejecting his request to extend his service.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Tribunal should:

| — | annul the decision of 7 April 2014 of the Secretary General of the EESC retiring the applicant with effect as of the evening of 31 December 2014; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of 7 April 2014 of the Secretary General of the EESC retiring the applicant with effect as of the evening of 31 December 2014;

| — | annul the decision of 30 September 2014 of the Director of Human Resources and Internal Services refusing, by a power delegated from the appointing authority, to concede to his request, brought on 3 September 2014, for the extension of his occupational activity until 31 May 2015; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of 30 September 2014 of the Director of Human Resources and Internal Services refusing, by a power delegated from the appointing authority, to concede to his request, brought on 3 September 2014, for the extension of his occupational activity until 31 May 2015;

| — | annul so far as necessary the decision of 22 April 2015 of the Secretary General of the EESC rejecting the complaint brought on 22 December 2014 by the applicant against the decisions of 7 April and 30 September 2014; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul so far as necessary the decision of 22 April 2015 of the Secretary General of the EESC rejecting the complaint brought on 22 December 2014 by the applicant against the decisions of 7 April and 30 September 2014;

| — | order the EESC to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the EESC to pay the costs.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 193 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 406
110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 193

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 25, 2007

         Received and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

                            October 4, 2007

                Reported by Mr. Leahy, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
 Recognizing all hunters across the United States for their continued 
                         commitment to safety.

Whereas in 2006 there were over 16,000,000 hunters in the United States of which 
        only .0013 percent incurred an injury during the past hunting season;
Whereas in 2006 this injury rate was lower than many other forms of recreation;
Whereas there are 70,000 hunter education instructors teaching hunter safety, 
        ethics, and conservation to approximately 750,000 students successfully 
        each year;
Whereas State fish and game agencies began offering hunter safety programs in 
        1949, and since then, more than 35,000,000 people have been certified;
Whereas much of the success of hunter safety can be contributed to hunter 
        education training and the role of responsible hunters in the field;
Whereas Congress commends Pennsylvania hunters for setting a new State safety 
        record in 2006;
Whereas hunters continue year after year to improve their safety record; and
Whereas hunters are the vital link in preserving and maintaining the great 
        natural resources in the United States, including wild places: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That the Congress--
            (1) recognizes all hunters across the United States for 
        their continued commitment to safety; and
            (2) directs the Secretary of the Senate to transmit a copy 
        of this resolution to the Pennsylvania State Game Commissioner 
        and the Director of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 24, 2007.

            Attest:

                                            LORRAINE C. MILLER,

                                                                 Clerk.

                                                       Calendar No. 406

110th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                            H. CON. RES. 193

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 Recognizing all hunters across the United States for their continued 
                         commitment to safety.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            October 4, 2007

                       Reported without amendment
```
**IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA Supreme Court Cause No. DA 24**  **- 0098** 

__________________________________________________________________ IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF: HANNAH HAN,

Petitioner/Appellee, and MAURICE DEGENNARO,

Respondent/ Appell ant . **ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME** 

Upon consideration of

A ppel la nt' s M otion fo r Extension of T ime to File Opening Brief and Affidavit in Support , and for good cause appearing therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including July 17 , 2024 , within w hich to file his Opening Brief.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

June 11 2024

06/11/2024

Case Number: DA 24-0098
# C_2017151EN.01000702.xml

| 15.5.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 151/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.5.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 151/7

---

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 16 March 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione — Italy) — Agenzia delle Entrate v Marci Identi

(Case C-493/15) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Taxation - Value added tax - Article 4(3) TEU - Sixth Directive - State aid - Procedure discharging bankrupt natural persons from debts (esdebitazione) - Ineligibility of VAT debts))

(2017/C 151/10)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Referring court

Corte suprema di cassazione

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Agenzia delle Entrate

Applicant:

Defendant: Marci Identi

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

EU law, in particular Article 4(3) TEU and Articles 2 and 22 of the Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment, and the rules on State aid, must be interpreted to the effect that it does not preclude value added tax debts from being declared irrecoverable under national legislation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, providing for a bankruptcy discharge procedure by means of which a court may, under certain conditions, declare irrecoverable the debts of a natural person which have not been settled by the close of the bankruptcy proceedings initiated against that person.

---

(1)  OJ C 406, 7.12.2015.

1

---
# C_2017213EN.01002502.xml

| 3.7.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 213/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.7.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 213/25

---

Judgment of the General Court of 12 May 2017 — Costa v Parliament

(Joined Cases T-15/15 and T-197/15) (1)

1

((Rules governing emoluments of Members of the Parliament - Old-age pension - Suspension - Recovery - Rule against overlapping - Rules on payment of expenses and allowances to Members of the European Parliament - Reference to national legislation - Article 12(2a)(v) of the Regulation on life-annuities of Members of the Italian Chamber of Deputies - Allowance received for exercising the function of President of an Italian Port Authority - Legitimate expectations))

(2017/C 213/33)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Paolo Costa (Venice, Italy) (represented by: G. Orsoni and M. Romeo, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: G. Corstens and S. Seyr, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Two actions based on Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of the decisions of the Bureau of the Parliament of 20 October 2014 and of 9 February 2015 concerning, respectively, suspension of the provisional retirement pension of the applicant and recovery of the sum of EUR 49 770,42 paid in that respect, as well as annulment of debit note 2015-239 of 23 February 2015 concerning that recovery.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the actions; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the actions;

| 2. | Orders Paolo Costa to pay the costs, including those relating to the interlocutory proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Paolo Costa to pay the costs, including those relating to the interlocutory proceedings.

---

(1)  OJ C 81, 9.3.2015.

1

---
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS For the Fifth Circuit

No. 01-50989

WENDY PEET; ROXANNA MORITZ; STACEY MAXWELL

Plaintiffs - Counter Defendants - Appellants

VERSUS

AMERICAN INCOME LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY; AMERICAN INCOME LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY NON-EXEMPT EMPLOYEES DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION PLAN; AMERICAN INCOME LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY EXEMPT EMPLOYEES 401 (K) PROFIT SHARING PLAN

Defendants - Counter Plaintiffs - Appellees

Appeal from the United States District Court For the Western District of Texas, Waco

W-99-CV-373 August 12, 2002

Before DAVIS, JONES, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Based upon our review of the record in this case and a

consideration of the briefs of the parties and argument of counsel,

we are satisfied that the district court did not commit reversible

error.

AFFIRMED.
No. 43064.

#### Protests 638358-G, etc., of Hutzler Bros. Co. et al. (Baltimore, etc.).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
# C_2015320EN.01001801.xml

| 28.9.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 320/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.9.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 320/18

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Itzehoe (Germany) lodged on 23 July 2015 — Raiffeisen Privatbank Liechtenstein AG v Gerhild Lukath

(Case C-397/15)

(2015/C 320/25)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Landgericht Itzehoe

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Raiffeisen Privatbank Liechtenstein AG

Applicant:

Defendant: Gerhild Lukath

Defendant:

Other parties to the proceedings: Rüdiger Boy, Boy Finanzberatung GmbH, Christian Maibaum, Vienna-Life Lebensversicherungs AG, Frank Weber

Other parties to the proceedings:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Is the agreement between a bank and a consumer for the granting of credit, which is linked to an agreement to take out life assurance and an agreement for advising on and brokering a capital investment, which in turn serves as security for the credit amount, to be regarded as a contract for the supply of services within the meaning of Article 5(2) of the Rome Convention of 19 June 1980 on the law applicable to contractual obligations (1)? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Is the agreement between a bank and a consumer for the granting of credit, which is linked to an agreement to take out life assurance and an agreement for advising on and brokering a capital investment, which in turn serves as security for the credit amount, to be regarded as a contract for the supply of services within the meaning of Article 5(2) of the Rome Convention of 19 June 1980 on the law applicable to contractual obligations (1)?

1

| 2. | Is Article 5(2) of the Rome Convention also applicable to cases in which advertising comes and/or contact is made from a county in which the consumer has his main place of residence, although he signs the agreements at his secondary place of residence, if the other party to the agreements or his agent received the consumer’s order in the State of the main place of residence? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Is Article 5(2) of the Rome Convention also applicable to cases in which advertising comes and/or contact is made from a county in which the consumer has his main place of residence, although he signs the agreements at his secondary place of residence, if the other party to the agreements or his agent received the consumer’s order in the State of the main place of residence?

---

(1)  OJ 1980 L 266, p. 1.

1

---
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 81 (Friday, April 27, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 21023]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-8074]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Disease, Disability, and Injury Prevention and Control Special 
Emphasis Panel (SEP): Optimal Resources and Care for Children With 
Craniofacial Malformations, Request for Applications (RFA) DD07-008 and 
Public Health Research Grants on Orofacial Clefts and Craniosynostosis, 
RFA DD07-009

    In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention (CDC) announces the following meeting of the aforementioned 
SEP:

    Time and Date: 1 p.m.-4 p.m., June 4, 2007 (Closed).
    Place: Teleconference.
    Status: The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance 
with provisions set forth in Section 552b(c)(4) and (6), Title 5 
U.S.C., and the Determination of the Director, Management Analysis 
and Services Office, CDC, pursuant to Public Law 92-463.
    Matters to be Discussed: The meeting will include the review, 
discussion, and evaluation of scientific merit of grant applications 
received in response to RFA DD07-008, ``Optimal Resources and Care 
for Children with Craniofacial Malformations,'' and RFA DD07-009, 
``Public Health Research Grants on Orofacial Clefts and 
Craniosynostosis,'' RFA DD07-009.
    Contact Person for More Information: Maurine Goodman, MA, MPH, 
Scientific Review Administrator, Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road, NE., Mailstop D72, Atlanta, GA 30333, 
Telephone 404.639.4737.
    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining 
to announcements of meetings and other committee management 
activities, for both CDC and the Agency for Toxic Substances and 
Disease Registry.

    Dated: April 20, 2007.
Elaine L. Baker,
Acting Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for 
Disease Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. E7-8074 Filed 4-26-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P