alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Reed, *in error, versus*Tay.

In a justice’s court, a denial to allow costs to the exact amount claimed* when a smaller amount is allowed, is not error.

Tay brought an action against Reed in a justice’s court. Judgment was rendered on nonsuit for the defendant, Reed, who taxed his costs at $14,11. The justice rendered judgment for costs, $4,87. To correct that judgment, and to recover his whole bill of costs, Reed brings this writ of error.

*J. Hodsdon,*for plaintiff in error,

cites 5 Mass. 389; 7 Mass. 453 ; 12 Mass. 379.

*Peters,*for defendant.

Wells, J.,

orally,— No error *of fact*has been assigned. No fact, extra the record, has been proved. We must therefore regard the charge as an error *of law.*A denial to allow costs to the exact amount claimed, when some amount is allowed, is not error in law.

*Judgment of the justice affirmed.*
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-25,667-03

EX PARTE TERRY LYNN DAVIS, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 23110A-422 IN THE 422ND DISTRICT COURT

FROM KAUFMAN COUNTY 

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of possession of a

controlled substance and sentenced to imprisonment for life. The Fifth Court of Appeals affirmed

his conviction. Davis v. State, No. 05-06-00527-CR (Tex. App.—Dallas June 2007, no pet.). 

On March 22, 2013, the trial court signed an order designating issues. The habeas record has

been forwarded to this Court prematurely. We remand this application to the 422nd District Court

of Kaufman County to allow the trial judge to complete an evidentiary investigation and enter
findings of fact and conclusions of law.

This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The

issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all

affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or

deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall

be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall

be obtained from this Court. 

Filed: October 8, 2014

Do not publish
(Reap. Dec. 8846)

#### The Tupman Thurlow Co., Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 67521-1/2.

(Decided June 13, 1957)

*Barnes, Richardson & Colburn*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant *Attorney Genera,!.,*for the defendant.

Donlon, Judge:

This appeal to reappraisement has been submitted for decision on the following stipulation of facts:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the attorneys for the parties hereto

> That the instant appeal to reappraisement covers canned corned beef exported from Argentina and packed in 5 pound tins, 6 tins to each case.

> That on or about the date of exportation such or similar merchandise was not freely offered either for sale for home consumption in Argentina or for exportation to the United States.

> That on or about the date of exportation the United States value of such merchandise, as such value is defined in Sec. 402 (e) of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended, was $17,424 per dozen tins, net packed.

> *697That the appeal to reappraisement is abandoned as to all merchandise other than that hereinbefore referred to in this stipulation and that the said instant appeal to reappraisement be submitted on this stipulation.

Accepting this stipulation as an agreed statement of facts, I find and hold that the United States value, as defined in section 402 (e) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, is the proper basis for determination of value of the canned corned beef described in the invoice and entry covered by this appeal, and that such value is $17,424 per dozen tins, net packed.

The appeal is dismissed as to all other merchandise. Judgment will be entered accordingly.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 197 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 197

 Commending the Hispanic Heritage Foundation for recognizing the next 
 generation of Latino role models for their academic achievements and 
                           community service.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             August 1, 2007

 Mr. Grijalva submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
      referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
 Commending the Hispanic Heritage Foundation for recognizing the next 
 generation of Latino role models for their academic achievements and 
                           community service.

Whereas the Hispanic Heritage Youth Awards were founded in 1998 by the Hispanic 
        Heritage Foundation to identify and promote the next generation of 
        Latino role models;
Whereas recipients of the Hispanic Heritage Youth Awards are selected from among 
        graduating high school seniors on the basis of their academic 
        achievement, community service, and other factors in the following 
        categories: academic excellence, community service, education, 
        engineering and mathematics, health care, journalism, and sports;
Whereas recipients of the Hispanic Heritage Youth Awards enter the LOFT (Latinos 
        on Fast Track) initiative and develop sustainable relationships with top 
        young professionals who provide the recipients with support and guidance 
        in becoming successful professionals;
Whereas nearly 40 percent of the entire Latino population is less than 18 years 
        of age;
Whereas it is in the national interest to identify and promote the next 
        generation of Latino leaders and role models by celebrating their 
        accomplishments in the classroom and community; and
Whereas the Hispanic Heritage Youth Awards has recognized more than 1,000 young 
        leaders: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That the Congress commends the Hispanic Heritage Foundation for 
recognizing the next generation of Latino role models for their 
academic achievements and community service.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 540 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 540

 Encouraging all 50 States to recognize and accommodate the release of 
   public school pupils from school attendance to attend off-campus 
religious classes at their churches, synagogues, houses of worship, and 
                       faith-based organizations.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 24, 2006

 Mr. DeMint submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                     the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Encouraging all 50 States to recognize and accommodate the release of 
   public school pupils from school attendance to attend off-campus 
religious classes at their churches, synagogues, houses of worship, and 
                       faith-based organizations.

Whereas the free exercise of religion is an inherent, fundamental, and 
        inalienable right secured by the 1st amendment to the Constitution of 
        the United States;
Whereas the free exercise of religion is important to the intellectual, moral, 
        civic, and ethical development of students in the United States;
Whereas the free exercise of religion must be conducted in a constitutionally 
        appropriate manner;
Whereas, in Zorach v. Clauson, 343 U.S. 306 (1952), the United States Supreme 
        Court held that a statute that provides for the release of public school 
        pupils from school attendance to attend religious classes is 
        constitutional if--

    (1) the programs take place away from school grounds;

    (2) school officials do not promote attendance at religious classes; 
and

    (3) the solicitation of students to attend is not done at the expense 
of public schools; and

Whereas the Constitution of the United States and the laws of the States allow 
        the school districts of the States to release public school pupils from 
        school attendance to attend religious classes: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) calls on all 50 States to recognize and accommodate 
        those churches, faith-based organizations, and individuals that 
        wish to release public school pupils from school attendance to 
        attend religious classes; and
            (2) respectfully requests the President of the United 
        States to proclaim the third week of November 2006 as ``Bible 
        Education in School Time Week''.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2015354EN.01001301.xml

| 26.10.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 354/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 354/13

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Audiencia Provincial de Illes Balears (Spain) lodged on 16 July 2015 — Francisca Garzón Ramos and José Javier Ramos Martín v Banco de Caja España de Inversiones, Salamanca y Soria, S.A., Intercotrans, S.L.

(Case C-380/15)

(2015/C 354/16)

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Referring court

Audiencia Provincial de Illes Balears

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Francisca Garzón Ramos and José Javier Ramos Martín

Applicants:

Defendants: Banco de Caja España de Inversiones, Salamanca y Soria, S.A., Intercotrans, S.L.

Defendants:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | In providing that a court seised of ordinary proceedings for the annulment of an enforceable instrument cannot under any circumstances grant interim relief staying mortgage enforcement proceedings relating to the instrument claimed to be null and void, is Article 698(1) of the Ley de Enjuiciamiento Civil compatible with the principle of effective judicial protection affirmed in Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (1)? |
| --- | --- |

1.

In providing that a court seised of ordinary proceedings for the annulment of an enforceable instrument cannot under any circumstances grant interim relief staying mortgage enforcement proceedings relating to the instrument claimed to be null and void, is Article 698(1) of the Ley de Enjuiciamiento Civil compatible with the principle of effective judicial protection affirmed in Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (1)?

1

| 2. | In the event that the answer to the previous question is that the provision of Spanish law is not compatible with the article of the Charter in question, is the case-law of the Court of Justice, and in particular its judgment in Case C-169/14 (2)
  Sánchez Morcillo and Abril García, therefore applicable to this case? |
| --- | --- |

2.

In the event that the answer to the previous question is that the provision of Spanish law is not compatible with the article of the Charter in question, is the case-law of the Court of Justice, and in particular its judgment in Case C-169/14 (2)
  Sánchez Morcillo and Abril García, therefore applicable to this case?

2

Sánchez Morcillo and Abril García

---

(1)  OJ 2000, C 364, p. 1.

1

(2)  EU:C:2014:2099.

2

---
Case: 2:13-cv-00007-EAS-NMK Doc #: 18 Filed: 12/10/13 Page: 1 of 1  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-08T10:07:28-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-81,510-02

EX PARTE SHERON GABRIEL TERRELL, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 11CR1752-83-2

 IN THE 56 DISTRICT COURT FROM GALVESTON COUNTY TH

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of possession of a

controlled substance and sentences to thirteen years’ imprisonment. 

On September 24, 2015, an order designating issues was signed by the trial court. Trial

counsel has not yet submitted his affidavit to the trial court. It appears the trial court has not

completed its fact finding. We remand this application to the 56 District Court of Galveston th

County to allow the trial judge to complete an evidentiary investigation and enterfindings of fact and

conclusions of law.
This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The

issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all

affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or

deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall

be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall

be obtained from this Court. 

Filed: April 13, 2016

Do not publish
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-50182 Conference Calendar

DANNY CARROLL STEPHENS, Petitioner-Appellant,

versus TROY WILLIAMSON; THE DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO DIVISION, Respondents-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. EP-01-CV-141-DB

-------------------- December 12, 2002 Before JOLLY, JONES, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Danny Carroll Stephens, federal prisoner #61583-080, appeals the district court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition for lack of jurisdiction. Stephens 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition challenged his conviction for possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). Stephens’s 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition argued that his indictment was defective under Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S.No. 02-50182 -2- 466 (2000), and that he should be able to bring his Apprendi claim under the “savings clause” of 28 U.S.C. § 2255. To proceed under the savings clause of 28 U.S.C. § 2255, Stephens must show that (1) his claim is based on a retroactively applicable Supreme Court decision which establishes that he may have been convicted of a nonexistent offense, and (2) his claim was foreclosed by circuit law at the time when the claim should have been raised in his trial, appeal, or first 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. See ReyesRequena v. United States , 243 F.3d 893, 904 (5th Cir. 2001). We recently decided that an Apprendi claim does not satisfy the savings clause test set out by Reyes-Requena
. See Wesson v. U.S. Penitentiary Beaumont, TX , F.3d , 2002 WL 31006173 at **3-4 (5th Cir. Sept. 5, 2002, No. 01-41000). Specifically, we held that Apprendi is not retroactively applicable to cases on collateral review and that an Apprendi violation does not show that a petitioner was convicted of a nonexistent offense. Id
. Accordingly, the district court’s dismissal of Stephens’ 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition is AFFIRMED.
| USGS HomeContact                   USGSSearch USGS |
|-----------------------------------------------------|
| USGS Geologic Investigation Series I-2719           |

##### Online Version 1.0
No. 64326.

protest 220481-K (Buffalo).

#### C. J. Tower & Sons *v.*United States,

*516Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of fresh or frozen boneless pork similar in all material respects to that the subject of Abstract 59714, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
**Operator’s name and address:**

Mick Zoske and Colton Penning. 604 Greenfield Avenue, Iowa Falls, IA 50126

**The specific applicable regulations from which relief is required (CFRs:** Using our drone for crop scouting and marketing. We want to use the drone to take videos of our equipment. The videos of equipment is used for the purpose of marketing

**How the operator will maintain an equivalent level of safety or no adverse impact to safety;** We will alway s use a spotter and keep ou r drone in line of sight. We intend to communicate with airports that operate closely to us or any

and all air traffic control facilities. We only want to operate during the day

time hours and in applicable weather conditions. If there are other aircraft in the area, we will immediately terminate any

of our drone fl yi ng activities to give operating conditions to other aircraft. We recognize the need for safety regulations.

**How granting the exemption would be in the public interest** We intend to work with the public out of honoring their intentions on our drone activities. We believe using the drone to make videos and pictures of our equipment betters our business for marketing purposes. We believe we can operate within the public safel y and effectivel y t o demonstrate the safet y of drone fl yi ng practices.

**The proposed operations and;** Using the UAS to fly

over a field with permission of owner and video record a piece of equipment in operation or scout fields for helping customers with farming practices.

**The make and model of the aircraft for proposed operations** DJI PHANTOM 3 ADVANCED and DJ I PHANTOM 2
110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 103

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That when the House adjourns on the legisla3 tive day of Thursday, March 29, 2007, or Friday, March 

4 30, 2007, on a motion offered pursuant to this concurrent 

5 resolution by its Majority Leader or his designee, it stand 

6 adjourned until 2 p.m. on Monday, April 16, 2007, or 

7 until the time of any reassembly pursuant to
2

•HCON 103 EH 

1 section 2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs 

2 first; and that when the Senate recesses or adjourns on 

3 Thursday, March 29, 2007, on a motion offered pursuant 

4 to this concurrent resolution by its Majority Leader or his 

5 designee, it stand recessed or adjourned until noon on 

6 Tuesday, April 10, 2007, or such other time on that day 

7 as may be specified by its Majority Leader or his designee 

8 in the motion to recess or adjourn, or until the time of 

9 any reassembly pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent 

10 resolution, whichever occurs first. 

11 SEC. 2. The Speaker of the House and the Majority 

12 Leader of the Senate, or their respective designees, acting 

13 jointly after consultation with the Minority Leader of the 

14 House and the Minority Leader of the Senate, shall notify 

15 the Members of the House and the Senate, respectively, 

16 to reassemble at such place and time as they may des17 ignate if, in their opinion, the public interest shall warrant 

18 it. 

Passed the House of Representatives March 29, 

2007. 

Attest:

Clerk. 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 103

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Providing for a conditional adjournment of the 

cess or adjournment of the Senate.House of Representatives and a conditional re-
EXHIBIT
32.2








CERTIFICATION
UNDER SECTION 906


OF
THE


SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Unico American Corporation
(the "Company") for the period ended  September 30, 2008, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Lester A. Aaron,
Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





1.
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
  and





2.
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.











/s/  Lester A.
Aaron





Name:                       
       Lester A. Aaron


Title:                                Treasurer,
Chief Financial Officer


Date:                                November
12, 2008














A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to Unico American Corporation,
and


will be
retained by Unico American Corporation, and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.