alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2017300EN.01000301.xml

| 11.9.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 300/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.9.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 300/3

---

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 18 July 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Kammergericht Berlin — Germany) — Konrad Erzberger v TUI AG

(Case C-566/15) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Free movement of workers - Principle of non-discrimination - Election of workers’ representatives to the supervisory board of a company - National legislation restricting the right to vote and to stand as a candidate to employees of establishments located in the national territory))

(2017/C 300/03)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Kammergericht Berlin

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Konrad Erzberger

Applicant:

Defendant: TUI AG

Defendant:

intervening parties: Vereinigung Cockpit e.V., Betriebsrat der Tui AG/Tui Group Services GmbH, Frank Jakobi, Andreas Barczewski, Peter Bremme, Dierk Hirschel, Michael Pönipp, Wilfried H. Rau, Carola Schwirn, Anette Stempel, Ortwin Strubelt, Marcell Witt, Wolfgang Flintermann, Stefan Weinhofer, ver.di -Vereinte Dienstleistungsgewerkschaft

intervening parties:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 45 TFEU must be interpreted as not precluding legislation of a Member State, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, under which the workers employed in the establishments of a group located in the territory of that Member State are deprived of the right to vote and to stand as a candidate in elections of workers’ representatives to the supervisory board of the parent company of that group, which is established in that Member State, and as the case may be, of the right to act or to continue to act as representative on that board, where those workers leave their employment in such an establishment and are employed by a subsidiary belonging to the same group established in another Member State.

---

(1)  OJ C 90, 7.3.2016.

1

---
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 112 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 2, 2007 

Received and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and 

Pensions 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Supporting the goals and ideas of a National Child Care 

Worthy Wage Day. 

Whereas approximately 63 percent of the Nation’s children 

under 5 are in nonparental care during part or all of the 

day while their parents work; 

Whereas the early care and education industry employs more 

than 2,300,000 workers; 

Whereas the average salary of early care and education workers is $18,180 per year, and only 1⁄3 have health insurance and even fewer have a pension plan; 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
2 

HCON 112 RFS 

Whereas the quality of early care and education programs is 

directly linked to the quality of early childhood educators; 

Whereas the turnover rate of early childhood program staff 

is roughly 30 percent per year, and low wages and lack 

of benefits, among other factors, make it difficult to retain high quality educators who have the consistent, caring relationships with young children that are important 

to children’s development; 

Whereas the compensation of early childhood program staff 

should be commensurate with the importance of the job 

of helping the young children of the Nation develop their 

social, emotional, physical, and cognitive skills, and to 

help them be ready for school; 

Whereas providing adequate compensation to early childhood 

program staff should be a priority, and resources may be 

allocated to improve the compensation of early childhood 

educators to ensure that quality care and education are 

accessible for all families; 

Whereas additional training and education for the early care 

and education workforce is critical to ensuring high-quality early learning environments; 

Whereas child care workers should receive compensation commensurate with such training and experience; and 

Whereas the Center for the Child Care Workforce, a project 

of the American Federation of Teachers Educational 

Foundation, with support by the National Association for 

the Education of Young Children and other early childhood organizations, recognizes May 1 as National Child 

Care Worthy Wage Day: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That the Congress supports the goals and 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
3 

HCON 112 RFS 

1 ideas of National Child Care Worthy Wage Day, and urges 

2 public officials and the general public to honor early child3 hood care and education staff and programs in their com4 munities and to work together to resolve the early child5 hood care and education staff compensation crisis. 

Passed the House of Representatives May 1, 2007. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
EXHIBIT 31.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT





Certification for Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act





I, Stuart Ducote, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of United Mortgage Trust;





2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))) for the registrant and have:





(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;





(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the liability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.





(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such  evaluation; and





(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and





5. I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors:





(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and





(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.


UNITED MORTGAGE TRUSTDate: August 16, 2010
By
/s/ Stuart DucotePresident
# C_2015294EN.01003402.xml

| 7.9.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 294/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.9.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 294/34

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Administratif (Luxembourg) lodged on 19 June 2015 — Charles Kohll, Sylvie Kohll-Schlesser v Director of the Administration des Contributions Directes

(Case C-300/15)

(2015/C 294/43)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunal Administratif

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Charles Kohll, Sylvie Kohll-Schlesser

Applicants:

Defendant: Director of the Administration des Contributions Directes

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Does the principle of freedom of movement for workers, as enshrined in particular in Article 45 TFEU, preclude the provisions of Article 139ter(1) of the Law of 4 December 1967 on income tax, as amended, in so far as they restrict eligibility for the tax credit established there to persons in possession of a tax deduction form?

---
1Of the Tenth Circuit, sitting by designation.

United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

No. 02-1938

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Appellee,

v.

JOHN B. STEWART,

Defendant, Appellant.

Before

 Lynch, Circuit Judge,

Coffin and Porfilio,1 Senior Circuit Judges.

ERRATA

The opinion of the court issued on July 29,2003, is amended as

follows:

On page 8, line 7: delete "has the obligation" and substitute

"should"

On page 8, line 8: delete "to"

On page 8, line 14: insert the following footnote after

"cause."

Although we urge full disclosure of all non-trivial

information available to law enforcement, this does not

alter the longstanding materiality test for a Franks

hearing. An evidentiary hearing is required only if the

defendant is able to show that alleged misstatements or

omissions are material to the probable cause

determination.
#### British Tweeds, Inc. *v.*United States

No. 6732.

Entry No. 715303.

Invoice dated Hawick, Scotland, October 1944.

Certified October 1944.

Entered at New York, N. Y., December 11, 1944.

(Decided January 9, 1947)

*Strauss & Hedges (Hadley S. King*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Cole, Judge (Abstract):

This appeal for reappraisement of various items of merchandise concerns the so-called British purchase tax, described in the law of the United Kingdom entitled, “Finance (No. 2) Act 1940 3 & 4 Geo. 6 Ch. 48.” The said tax was held not to be an item to be included in foreign value as defined in section 402 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended by the Customs Administrative Act of 1938 (19 U. S. C. 1940 ed. § 1402 (c)). *United States*v. *Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp.,*33 C. C. P. A. 183, C. A. D. 334.

The cited case has been incorporated herein by consent of the parties who further agree on a set of facts, embodied in a written stipulation submitting the present case, showing export value, section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. 1940 ed. § 1402 (d)), to be the proper basis for appraisement of the instant merchandise, and that such statutory values are the appraised values of the articles in question, less additions made by the importer on entry because of advances in similar cases.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This Schedule Contains Summary Financial Information Extracted From The
Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements As Of March 31, 1998 And For
The Three Months Then Ended And Is Qualified In Its Entirety By
Reference To Such Financial Statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          15,080
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  117,903
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    853,569
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,147,818
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        463,220
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           119
<OTHER-SE>                                     439,110
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,147,818
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               334,545
<CGS>                                          264,845
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  302,541
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,587
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 19,083
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (413)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             19,496
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  1,530
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    17,966
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.52
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.36
        

</TABLE>
INFOIMAGING TECHNOLOGIES INC.

       INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

This Certifies That:

                                              CUSIP 45665S 10 9

is the record holder of

Fully Paid and Non-Assessable Shares of Common Stock, Par Value $.001 Per
                            Share of

                Info Imaging Technologies, Inc.

transferable on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof, in person
or by duly authorized attorney, upon surrender of this Certificate properly
endorsed.  This Certificate and the shares represented hereby are issued and
shall be subject to all the provisions of the Articles of Incorporation of the
Corporation and any amendments thereof and the By-Laws, to all of which the
holder of this Certificate by acceptance hereof assents.

This Certificate is not valid unless countersigned and registered by the
Transfer Agent and Registrar.

WITNESS the facsimile seal of the Corporation and the facsimile signatures of
its duly authorized officers.

Dated:

"Chris Dieterich"                                 "Altaf Nazerali"
-----------------                                 -------------------
Chris Dieterich                                   Altaf Nazerali
Secretary                                    President
## In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth

___________________________ No. 02

- 18

- 00375

- CR No. 02

- 18

- 00376

- CR No. 02

- 18

- 00377

- CR

___________________________

On Appeal from County Criminal Court No. 5 Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 1492946, 1545647, 1545908

Before Pittman, J. ; Sudderth, C.J. ; and Birdwell, J

. Per C uriam Memorandum Opinion 

### O MAR 

### J AWARA , 

### Appellant

V



### . T HE 

### S TATE OF 

### T EXAS2 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT Appellant has moved to dismiss his appeal. Because we have not yet decided this case, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a), 43.2(f).

Per Curiam
Do Not Publish Tex. R. App

. P. 47.2(b)
Delivered: November 15 , 2018
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the 
Company's Balance Sheet as of March 31, 1999 and the Statement Of Income
for the year ended March 31, 1999, and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial staements.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          84,124
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0    
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                84,124
<PP&E>                                       7,995,908
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,910,444
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,210,694<F1>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           48,259<F2>
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (619,939)        
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,210,694<F3>
<SALES>                                        267,289<F4>
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               267,289
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                16,957<F5>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              66,052
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                184,280
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            184,280
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   184,280
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   255.94<F6>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   255.94<F6>
<FN>
<F1>Includes unamortized mortgage refinancing costs           
<F2>Accrued interest on mortgage and first mortgage principal payment due 
    within one year 
<F3>Includes long-term debt 
<F4>Rental income includes basic rent and advance of primary overage rent 
<F5>Supervisory services and amortization of mortgage refinance costs 
<F6>Earnings per $5,000 participation unit, based on 720 participation units
    outstanding during the period

<PAGE>


</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

KEITH DARRIN MORRISON,

Petitioner

v.

MONTGOMERY COUNTY COURT OF 

COMMON PLEAS,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 143 MM 2019

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 22nd day of January, 2020, the Application for Leave to File 

Original Process is GRANTED, and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus and/or 

Extraordinary Relief is DENIED.
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Scott D. Grimes, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this AnnualReport on Form 10-K of Cardlytics, Inc. (the “registrant”); 

2. Based on my knowledge, this reportdoes not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period coveredby this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4.The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting. 

Date: March 19, 2018
# C_2017112EN.01000402.xml

| 10.4.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 112/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.4.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 112/4

---

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 16 February 2017 — Tudapetrol Mineralölerzeugnisse Nils Hansen KG v European Commission

(Case C-94/15 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - European market for paraffin wax and the German market for slack wax - Price-fixing and market-sharing - Obligation to state reasons - Evidence of the infringement - Distortion of the evidence))

(2017/C 112/06)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Tudapetrol Mineralölerzeugnisse Nils Hansen KG (represented by: U. Itzen and J. Ziebarth, lawyers)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: R. Sauer, C. Vollrath and L. Wildpanner, acting as Agents, and by A. Böhlke, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dimsisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dimsisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders Tudapetrol Mineralölerzeugnisse Nils Hansen KG to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Tudapetrol Mineralölerzeugnisse Nils Hansen KG to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 127, 20.4.2015.

1

---