alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SRC PhysProp Database ~age l of l

Data From SRC PhysProp Database :

Abbreviations in the 'Type' field : EXP = Experimental Data, EST = Estimated Data, EXT =

Extrapolated Data. Extrapolated data is based upon experimental measurement outside the temperature

range of the reported value .

References below are abbreviated citations . . . the full reference citations are NOT available here. References for Estimated data generally refer to the method used to make the estimate . . . most estimates

were made using SRC software .

CAS Number : 000075-05-8

Chem Name : ACETONITRILE

Mol Formula : C2H3 N

Mol Weight : 41 .05

Melting Pt : -43 .8 deg C

Boiling Pt : 81 .6 deg C

Water Solubility :

Value : 1E+006 mg/L

Temp : 25 deg C

Type : EXP

Ref : RIDDICK,JA ET AL . (1986)

Log P (octanol-water) :

Value : -0 .34

Type : EXP

Ref : HANSCH,C ET AL . (1995)

Vapor Pressure :

Value : 88 .8 mm Hg

Temp : 25 deg C

Type : EXP

Ref : BOUBLIK,T ET AL . (1984)

pKa Dissociation Constant :

Value : -4 .3

Temp

Type : EXP

Ref : PERRIN,DD (1965)

Henry's Law Constant :

Value : 3 .45E-005 atm-m3/mole

Temp : 25 deg C

Type : EXP

Ref : GAFFNEY,JS ET AL . (1987)

Atmospheric OH Rate Constant :

Value : 2 .63E-014 cm3/molecule-sec

Temp : 25 deg C

Type : EX P

Ref : ATKINSON,R (1994 )

Back To PhysProp Demo Page

http ://esc.syrres.com/interkow/webprop .exe 6/15/2006
# C_2017256EN.01001902.xml

| 7.8.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 256/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.8.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 256/19

---

Judgment of the General Court of 20 June 2017 — Industrie Aeronautiche Reggiane v EUIPO (NSU)

(Case T-541/15) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU word mark NSU - Prior national word mark NSU - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Genuine use of the earlier mark - Article 42(2) and (3) of Regulation No 207/2009))

(2017/C 256/19)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Industrie Aeronautiche Reggiane Srl (Reggio Emilia, Italy) (represented by: M. Gurrado, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: H. Kunz, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Audi AG (Ingolstadt, Germany)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 6 July 2015 (Case R 2132/2014-2) concerning opposition proceedings between Audi and Industrie Aeronautiche Reggiane.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Industrie Aeronautiche Reggiane to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Industrie Aeronautiche Reggiane to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 381, 16.11.2015.

1

---
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA F OURTH D ISTRICT

CRYSTAL RONEY , Appellant

,

v.

WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY, FSB , d/b/a CHRISTIANA TRUST, NOT INDIVIDUALLY

BUT AS TRUSTEE FOR PRE T IUM MORTGAGE ACQUISITION TRUST, Appellee

.

No

. 4D2 2

- 2313

[ July 20, 2023 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeent h Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Michael A. Robinson

, Judge ; L.T. Case No. CACE20018154

.
Bruce Jacobs of Jacobs Legal, PLLC

, Miami, for appellant

.
Nicholas S. Agnello of Burr & Forman LLP

, Fort Lauderdale, and Jacqueline Simms

- Petredis of Burr & Forman LLP, Tampa, for appellee

.

P ER C URIAM

.
Affirmed

.

G ROSS , G ERBER and L EVINE , J J ., concur

.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
United Air Lines, Inc. and Subsidiary Companies
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges    Six Months Ended June 30    20042003 (In Millions)Earnings:     Loss before income taxes$(846)$(2,039)Fixed charges, from below324 366 Undistributed earnings of affiliates2 - Interest capitalized(1)(2)   Loss$(521)$(1,675)   Fixed charges:    Interest expense$ 244 $ 294 Portion of rental expense representative  of the interest factor8072   Fixed charges$ 324$ 366   Ratio of earnings to fixed charges(a)(a)      
___________
(a)  Earnings were inadequate to cover fixed charges by $845 millionin 2004 and $2.0 billion in 2003.
Case No. 13,322.

#### STATE v. BREWER.

[Nowhere reported; opinion not now accessible.]
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-14-00662-CV

In The Matter of M. A. T., a Child

On appeal from the

County Court at Law No. 5 of Nueces County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 13-JUV-208

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal 

DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion. Costs of the appeal are adjudged against 

appellant.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

September 3, 2015.
August 30, 1957

Reap. Dec. 8986.

#### S. *Stern Henry & Co., et al.*v. *United States.*

Entered at New York, N. Y. [Not published.] Motion by plaintiffs.
<PAGE>   1
                      UGI UTILITIES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
        COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES - EXHIBIT 12.1
                             (Thousands of dollars)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                      Three
                                                      Months
                                                       Ended                      Year Ended September 30,
                                                    December 31,  -------------------------------------------------------------
                                                       1997           1997           1996            1995             1994     
                                                   -------------  ------------   -------------    ------------     ------------
<S>                                                 <C>            <C>            <C>              <C>              <C>
EARNINGS:
Earnings before income taxes                        $   26,008     $   63,275     $    61,717      $   39,759       $   41,244
Interest expense                                         4,273         16,696          15,921          16,632           16,482
Amortization of debt discount and expense                   48            176             173             206              187
Interest component of rental expense                       410          1,887           1,838           1,604            1,344 
                                                   -------------  ------------   -------------    ------------     ------------
                                                    $   30,739     $   82,034     $    79,649      $   58,201       $   59,257 
                                                   =============  ============   =============    ============     ============

FIXED CHARGES:
Interest expense                                        $4,273     $   16,696     $    15,921      $   16,632       $   16,482
Amortization of debt discount and expense                   48            176             173             206              187
Allowance for funds used during
  construction (capitalized interest)                       10            114             107              65              136
Interest component of rental expense                       410          1,887           1,838           1,604            1,344 
                                                   -------------  ------------   -------------    ------------     ------------
                                                    $    4,741     $   18,873     $    18,039      $   18,507       $   18,149 
                                                   =============  ============   =============    ============     ============

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                        6.48           4.35            4.42            3.14             3.27 
                                                   =============  ============   =============    ============     ============
</TABLE>
**Exhibit 33.2**

 

**MANAGEMENT’S ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE**

 

Management of the Agency and Trust division of Citibank, N.A. (or “Company”) is responsible for assessing compliance with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission.

 

Management has determined that the servicing criteria in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB are applicable in regard to the servicing platform as of and for the period as follows:

 

Platform:  Publicly-issued (i.e., transaction-level reporting initially required under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) equipment loan-backed securities issued by CNH Equipment Trust, as listed in Appendix A, for which the Company provides trustee and paying agent services (the “Platform”).

 

Applicable Servicing Criteria:  All servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d), to the extent required by Item 1122(d) servicing criteria in regards to the activities performed by the Company with respect to the Platform, except for the following servicing criteria: 1122(d)(1)(i)-1122(d)(1)(v), 1122(d)(2)(iii), 1122(d)(2)(vi)-1122(d)(2)(vii), 1122(d)(3)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(i)-1122(d)(4)(xv), which management has determined are not applicable to the activities the Company performs with respect to the Platform (the “Applicable Servicing Criteria”).  With respect to the Platform, servicing criterion 1122(d)(3)(ii) is applicable only as it relates to remittances.

 

Period:  Twelve months ended December 31, 2016 (the “Period”).

 

With respect to the Platform as of and for the Period, the Company’s management provides the following assessment of compliance with respect to the Applicable Servicing Criteria:

 

The Company’s management is responsible for assessing the Company’s compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.

 

The Company’s management has assessed compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.  In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Securities and Exchange Commission in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB.

 

Based on such assessment, the Company has complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.

 

KPMG LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report with respect to management’s assessment of compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of and for the Period.

 
|   | **CITIBANK,   N.A.** |
|--------|----------------------|
|   |                 |
|   | By:                  | /s/Karen   Montbach |
|   |                 |   |
|   | Its:                 | Managing   Director |

 

Dated: February 24, 2017

 

----

 

Appendix A

 

CNH Transactions and Securities Constituting the Platform

 

**DEAL NAME**

 

CNH Equipment Trust 2014-C

CNH Equipment Trust 2015-C

CNH Equipment Trust 2016-A

CNH Equipment Trust 2016-C

 

----
#### Andrea Jane (Benton) COGGINS v. William John BENTON

CA 94-192

873 S.W.2d 820

Court of Appeals of Arkansas En Banc

Opinion delivered April 13, 1994

*Norman Wilbur,*for appellant.

*Larry Dean Kissee,*for appellee.

Per Curiam.

The appellee has filed a motion to dismiss the above appeal because the transcript was not filed within seven months from the entry of the judgment from which the appeal was taken as required by Rule 5(b) of the Rules of Appellate Procedure. The problem comes from the fact that the transcript was not completed by the court reporter in time to be filed within the seven-month period.

We find the motion to dismiss must be granted. It has been held that in the absence of unavoidable casualty an appeal should be dismissed when the record is filed outside the seven-month period. *Pierce*v. *Pierce,*238 Ark. 46, 377 S.W.2d 868 (1964); *see also Thomas*v. *Arkansas State Plant Board,*254 Ark. 997-A, 497 S.W.2d 9 (1973).

Here, the trial court extended the time for filing the record to a time which was outside the seven-month period, but the court had no authority to take that action. In the case of *In Re Estate of Wilkinson,*311 Ark. 311, 843 S.W.2d 316 (1992), the supreme *190court said, “when an appellant seeks an extension of time beyond the seven months to file his or her record, his or her remedy is to file a partial record in the supreme court and seek an extension for a compelling reason, such as unavoidable casualty.” *See also*Arkansas Supreme Court and Court of Appeals Rule 3-5, which was formerly Rule 26, and the case of *Evans*v. *Northwest Tire Service, 21*Ark. App. 75, 728 S.W.2d 523 (1987).

Cooper, J., not participating.
No. 41989.

#### Protests 306718-G, etc., of Saks & Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel bottles, boxes, lamps, flacons, atomizers, incense burners, and photo frames chiefly used in the household for utilitarian purposes were held dutiable at 40 percent under paragraph 339. *United Slates*v. *Friedlaender*(21 C. C. P. A. 103, T. D. 46445), *Dow*v. *United States*(id. 282, T. D. 46816), *Woolworth*v. *United States*(T. D. 47857) and *Rice*v. *United States*(T. D. 49373) cited. Toilet sets like those the subject of Abstract 8950 were held separately dutiable as follows: the brushes at 45 percent under paragraph 1407 and the mirrors at 50 percent under paragraph 230.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 603 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 603

   Designating Thursday, November 16, 2006, as ``Feed America Day''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

           September 30 (legislative day, September 29), 2006

    Mr. Hatch (for himself and Mr. Bennett) submitted the following 
    resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Designating Thursday, November 16, 2006, as ``Feed America Day''.

Whereas Thanksgiving Day celebrates the spirit of selfless giving and an 
        appreciation for family and friends;
Whereas the spirit of Thanksgiving Day is a virtue upon which the United States 
        was founded;
Whereas, in 2006, great numbers of citizens of the United States continue to 
        suffer hunger and other privations; and
Whereas selfless sacrifice breeds a genuine spirit of Thanksgiving, both 
        affirming and restoring the fundamental principles of the society of the 
        United States: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) designates Thursday, November 16, 2006, as ``Feed 
        America Day''; and
            (2) calls upon the people of the United States--
                    (A) to sacrifice 2 meals on Thursday, November 16, 
                2006; and
                    (B) to donate to a religious or charitable 
                organization of their choice the money that they would 
                have spent on food for that day for the purpose of 
                feeding the hungry.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



I, Gordon R. Arnold, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Sierra Monitor Corporation;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

a.

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b.

Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c.

Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a.

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b.

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

Date:

October 29, 2007

By:     /s/ Gordon R. Arnold

Gordon R. Arnold

Chief Financial Officer







Page 21 of 22
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 18

- 00131

- CR

M ANUEL R AMIREZ

, Appellant

V

.

T HE S TATE OF T EXAS §

§

§

§

§ On Appeal from Criminal District

Court No. 1

of Tarran t County (1520847R)

January 17, 2019

Opinion by Justice Bassel

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial

c ourt is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Dabney Bassel

Justice Dabney Bassel
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

(Mark One)

[x]	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2007

OR

[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ____________ to ___________

Commission file number 0-2666

250 WEST 57th ST. ASSOCIATES L.L.C.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

A New York Limited Liability Company 	13-6083380

(State or other jurisdiction of	(I.R.S. Employer

incorporation or organization)	Identification No.)

60 East 42nd Street, New York, New York 10165

(Address of principal executive offices)

(Zip Code)

(212) 687-8700

(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

N/A

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [ X ].  No [  ] .

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act) Yes [  ]  No [ X ] .

 

 

PART I.  FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.  Financial Statements.

250 West 57th St. Associates L.L.C.

(A Limited Liability Company)

Condensed Balance Sheets

(Unaudited)
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Gordon R. Arnold, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the quarterly report of Sierra Monitor Corporation on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such quarterly report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Sierra Monitor Corporation.





Date:

August 13, 2007

By:

/s/ Gordon R. Arnold

Gordon R. Arnold

Chief Executive Officer

Chief Financial Officer
Case No. 6,499.

#### GODY v. PLANT.

[4 Cranch, C. C. 670.] 1

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

March Term, 1836.

*Justice*op the Peace — Authority to Bind Orphan Child.

Justices of the peace have no authority to bind out an orphan child while the orphans' court is in session.

Upon petition of Thomas Gody to be discharged from the service of James *K.*Plant, who claimed the petitioner as his apprentice, it appearing that he was bound out by two justices of the peace, as an orphan, upon a day in which the orphans’ court was in session.

THE COURT

discharged the apprentice, being of opinion that under the Maryland Acts 1793, c. 45, and 1794, c. 47, the justices had no power to bind out an orphan while the orphans’ court was in session.
----

| 1. | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Corporation for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation. |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/ PATRICK E. GOTTSCHALK                                  |   |   |
|------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
| Patrick E. GottschalkPresident and Chief Executive Officer |   |   |
| Date: August 3, 2009                                       |   |   |

----