alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UGI UTILITIES INC.
COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES  EXHIBIT 12.1
(Thousands of dollars)
 ThreeMonthsEndedDecember 31,
    
    
    Year Ended September 30,2008
    
    
    2008
    
    
    2007
    
    
    2006
    
    
    2005
    
    
    2004Earnings:Earnings before income taxes
    
    $
    62,011
    
    
    $
    123,977
    
    
    $
    122,766
    
    
    $
    80,544
    
    
    $
    84,953
    
    
    $
    83,098Interest expense
    
    
    11,380
    
    
    
    39,065
    
    
    
    42,327
    
    
    
    24,102
    
    
    
    18,079
    
    
    
    17,698Amortization of debt discount and expense
    
    
    154
    
    
    
    467
    
    
    
    462
    
    
    
    243
    
    
    
    247
    
    
    
    233Estimated interest component of rental expense
    
    
    467
    
    
    
    1,619
    
    
    
    1,506
    
    
    
    1,675
    
    
    
    1,568
    
    
    
    1,477$
    74,012
    
    
    $
    165,128
    
    
    $
    167,061
    
    
    $
    106,564
    
    
    $
    104,847
    
    
    $
    102,506Fixed Charges:Interest expense
    
    $
    11,380
    
    
    $
    39,065
    
    
    $
    42,327
    
    
    $
    24,102
    
    
    $
    18,079
    
    
    $
    17,698Amortization of debt discount and expense
    
    
    154
    
    
    
    467
    
    
    
    462
    
    
    
    243
    
    
    
    247
    
    
    
    233Allowance for funds used during
construction (capitalized interest)
    
    
    49
    
    
    
    139
    
    
    
    179
    
    
    
    85
    
    
    
    22
    
    
    
    7Estimated interest component of rental expense
    
    
    467
    
    
    
    1,619
    
    
    
    1,506
    
    
    
    1,675
    
    
    
    1,568
    
    
    
    1,477$
    12,050
    
    
    $
    41,290
    
    
    $
    44,474
    
    
    $
    26,105
    
    
    $
    19,916
    
    
    $
    19,415Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
    
    
    6.14
    
    
    
    4.00
    
    
    
    3.76
    
    
    
    4.08
    
    
    
    5.26
    
    
    
    5.28
<PAGE> 1

 EXHIBIT 32b


                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Twin Disc, Incorporated (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ending September 30, 2005, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as of the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Christopher J. Eperjesy, Vice President - Finance, Chief
Financial Officer and Secretary of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

     (1)    the Report fully complies with Section 13(a) of the Securities
     Exchange Act of 1934, and

     (2)    the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
     the Company.


November 14, 2005                        /s/ CHRISTOPHER J. EPERJESY
                                         ----------------------------
                                         Christopher J. Eperjesy
                                         Vice President - Finance,
                                         Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
No. 43059.

#### Protest 997914-G of New York Merchandise Co., Inc. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of Abstract 30367 the soap boxes in question were held dutiable at 40 percent under paragraph 339 as claimed.
14910-lJ-PI

SUI\1M.ARY: We propose to adopt a nev: airworthiness directive (AD) for the produc

r

•

~"

(,-11-0

j%"":f

-'""'"

C.C~

~b(-g(/o

~":'-l4-

... • • • • • • •

As per procedure, the main pumps are then sv.'itched off. increasing the

level of unavailable fuel. This, in combination ••••ith very low fuel

quantities or another independent trapped fuel failure scenarios. can lead

to fuel sta.ryation on the affected engine{k). .•..•..•.

An A33D experienced an uncommanded engine #1 in night spool down.

which occurred while applying fuel gra~ity feed procedure, in response to

10:""pressure indications ITom all fuel bolost pumps, in both left and right

wmgs.

The investigations revealed that lhe wing tank pressure switches PrN (part

number) HTE69000-1 h3d frozen due to water accumulated ;/1 their

external par1. causing spurious low pressure indications.

condition as:

listed above. This proposed AD results from mandatory continuing airv.'orthiness

infoon"ion (MeAl) ong;nated by an av'ation 1UlhOrityof anolh" eounlry 10 identify

and correct an unsafe condition on an a"iation product. The MeAl describes the unsa

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A33l200 and A330-3QOSeries Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

RIN 2120-AA64

Federal Aviation Administration

IDocket No. FAA-201 o-u*"'*; Directorate IdeDtifier 201 O-NJ\:]·) OZ-AD}

DEPARTj\JfENT OF TRANSPORT AnON

14 eFR Part 39

FAA Form 1360-14.1 (6-89) OFFICIAL FILE copy
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 584 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 584

     To authorize the production of records, testimony, and legal 
                            representation.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 25, 2006

     Mr. Frist (for himself and Mr. Reid) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
     To authorize the production of records, testimony, and legal 
                            representation.

Whereas the United States Attorney's Office for the District of Columbia is 
        conducting an investigation of the financial disclosures made by Dr. 
        Lester Crawford to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and 
        Pensions in connection with confirmation proceedings on Dr. Crawford's 
        nomination to be Commissioner of the Food and Drug Administration;
Whereas the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions has received a 
        request from the United States Attorney's Office for testimony of three 
        employees of the Committee and for records of the Committee relevant to 
        the investigation;
Whereas, pursuant to sections 703(a) and 704(a)(2) of the Ethics in Government 
        Act of 1978, 2 U.S.C.  288b(a) and 288c(a)(2), the Senate may direct 
        its counsel to represent employees of the Senate with respect to any 
        subpoena, order, or request for testimony relating to their official 
        responsibilities;
Whereas, by the privileges of the Senate of the United States and rule XI of the 
        Standing Rules of the Senate, no evidence under the control or in the 
        possession of the Senate can, by administrative or judicial process, be 
        taken from such control or possession but by permission of the Senate; 
        and
Whereas, when it appears that evidence under the control or in the possession of 
        the Senate is needed for the promotion of justice, the Senate will take 
        such action as will promote the ends of justice consistent with the 
        privileges of the Senate: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved,  That the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and 
Pensions is authorized to produce documents and committee staff are 
authorized to testify in these and related proceedings, except where a 
privilege should be asserted.
    Sec. 2. The Senate Legal Counsel is authorized to represent 
employees of the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions in 
connection with the document production and testimony authorized in 
section one of this resolution.
                                 <all>
```
Before the Third Division,

November 21, 1950

No. 54872.

#### Harry Arikian et al. *v.*United States,

protests 145562-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

It was stipulated that the Federal Reserve bank certified dual rates of exchange for the currencies involved in the liquidation of the entries for the dates of exportation of the merchandise covered by the entries and that the circumstances relating to the liquidation of the said entries are similar in all material respects to those in Abstract 54732. In view of this stipulation and following the cited decision it was held that the currencies of the invoices covered by certain enumerated entries should have been converted in the manner directed b.y the judgment of this court in said Abstract 54732, in accordance with Bureau of Customs Circular Letter No. 2675, dated October 19, 1949.
III 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 561 

Designating the month of September 2006, as ‘‘Rural America Month’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 7 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 6), 2006 

Mr. REID (for himself, Mrs. LINCOLN, Mr. FRIST, Mr. BURNS, Mr. BYRD, 

Mr. SALAZAR, Mr. SCHUMER, Mrs. CLINTON, Mr. PRYOR, Mr. BAUCUS, 

Mr. LIEBERMAN, Mrs. BOXER, Mr. BINGAMAN, Mr. DORGAN, Mr. NELSON of Florida, Mr. DAYTON, and Mr. DURBIN) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating the month of September 2006, as ‘‘Rural 

America Month’’. 

Whereas more than 55 million people live in rural areas of 

the country; 

Whereas rural areas make up eighty percent of the United 

States landscape; 

Whereas our rural communities are diverse, dynamic engines 

for growth in America; 

Whereas the contribution of rural Americans to the national 

economy is invaluable; 

Whereas rural America’s natural renewable resources can 

help our Nation break its dangerous reliance on foreign 

oil; 


pwalker on PRODPC60 with BILLS
2 

SRES 561 ATS 

Whereas rural America’s farmers and ranchers feed families 

across the country and around the globe while being 

stewards of our land and natural resources; 

Whereas rural Americans look to their local police officers, 

firefighters, EMTs and National Guard to keep them 

safe in times of national emergencies; 

Whereas the highest concentrations of veterans are found in 

rural counties; 

Whereas rural Americans deserve access to affordable health 

care; 

Whereas rural Americans deserve the finest education we can 

offer; 

Whereas rural America is a key part of our growing information highway; and 

Whereas Americans in rural areas reflect values that make 

America great—community, service, hard work, family, 

and responsibility—their contributions should be recognized and commended: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates the month of September 2006, 

3 as ‘‘Rural America Month’’; and 

4 (2) encourages the people of the United States 

5 to observe ‘‘Rural America Month’’ with appropriate 

6 ceremonies and activities during the month of Sep7 tember. 

Æ 


pwalker on PRODPC60 with BILLS
-82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72

 36

 38

 40

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

09/08

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 08 Sep 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 39.11 N 77.11 W Meters AGL

★

■

■

■

■

★ ■ ■ ■ ■

★

● ● ●

●

★ ●

●

●

●
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-6318

ANTHONY M. BROWN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

BLUE RIDGE REGIONAL JAIL AUTHORITY-HCADF;

T. E. FEARS, Officer,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District

Judge. (CA-01-10-7)

Submitted: May 17, 2001 Decided: May 29, 2001

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anthony M. Brown, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Anthony M. Brown appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of

the district court. See Brown v. Blue Ridge Reg’l Jail, No. CA-01-

10-7 (W.D. Va. Jan. 31, 2001). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Case No. 14,605.

#### UNITED STATES v. BLADEN.

[1 Cranch, C. C. 548.] 1

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

July Term, 1809.

Homicide — Death Out of Jurisdiction.

If the mortal stroke be given in Alexandria, and the death happen in Maryland, this court has not jurisdiction of the offence as a homicide, but has jurisdiction of the assault and battery.

[Cited in U. S. v. Mortimer, Case No. 15,821.]

Indictment for manslaughter. The .right of peremptory challenge was allowed.

The mortal blow was given in Alexandria, the death happened in St. Mary’s county, in Maryland.

E. J. Lee and R. J. Taylor, for prisoner,

contended that the crime was not punishable here, and cited 1 East, P. C. 361; 1 Hawk. P. C. c. 31. 12. 13; Va. Law, Nov. 29, 1792, p. 104, c. 73, § 16.

Mr. Jones, for the United States.

There is no evidence of the defect of the common law, but the recital of the statute of 2 & 3 Edw. VI. c. 24. And the common law was *1161Dot as recited in that act. The statute of Virginia was made to repeal the statute of Edward, which was then in force in Virginia, and is not confined to counties in the state of Virginia, but speaks of contracts generally. The statute of Virginia is no evidence that the common law was defective; it was a substitute for the statute of Edw. VI.

The statute of Virginia speaks of any county, in Virginia, or elsewhere, as in the statute respecting conveyances. Va. Law, Dec. 13, 1792, p. 157, c. 90, § 5, and Dec. 25, 1794, p. 327, c. 179, § 1.

The counsel agreed to save the point of law.

Verdict, “Guilty.”

THE COURT,

upon consideration of the point reserved, was of opinion that as the death happened in St. Mary’s county, in Maryland, although the fatal stroke was given here, the judgment must be for the prisoner. the offence not being complete within our jurisdiction. Heydon's Case, 4 Coke, 41a; Hume v. Ogle, Id. 42b; 2 Inst. 318, 320; 3 Inst. 48, 49. 73.

The prisoner being also indicted for an as-, sault and battery, was bound over to appear to answer to that indictment, and in the mean time to be of good behavior.
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Commercial Mortgage  Servicing**D1050-084, 8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|--------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

  

Reference is hereby made tothat certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of December 1, 2015, byand among J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp., as Depositor,Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, Midland LoanServices, A Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as Special Servicer,Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Certificate Administrator,Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee, and Pentalpha SurveillanceLLC, as Operating Advisor and as Asset Representations Reviewer, with respectto Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2015-JP1 (the"Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise definedshall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement. 

 

Pursuant to Section 11.09 ofthis Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of CommercialMortgage Services do hereby certify that: 

 

1. A review of the activities ofthe Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2016 through December 31,2016 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance per theAgreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and 

 

2. To the best of myknowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of itsobligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period. 

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersignedhas executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2017. 

 

/s/ Daniel Bober

Daniel Bober 

Executive Vice President 

Wells Fargo Bank

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll  go far |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------|
ACCEPTED 03-14-00138-CR 4944842 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS 4/20/2015 8:37:36 AM JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK NO. 03-14-00138-CR LARRYDEWAYNE GARRETT 

### § § § § 

### § 

## vs. THE STATE OF TEXAS IN THE THIRD COURT OFAPPEALS

MOTION TOEXTEND TIME TO FILE APPELLANT'S BRIEF TO THE HONORABLEJUSTICES OF SAID COURT: Now comes Larry Dewayne Garrett, Appellant in the above styled and numbered cause, and moves this Court to grant an extension of time to file appellant's brief, pursuant to Rule 38.6 ofthe Texas Rules ofAppellate Procedure, and for good cause shows the following: 1. This case is on appeal from the County Court at Law Number 2 & 3 ofBell County, Texas. 2. The case below was styled the STATE OF TEXAS vs. Larry Dewayne Garrett, and numbered 2cl3-07176. 3. Appellant was convictedofViol Protect OrderBias/Prejudice. 4. Appellant was assessed a sentence ofone year onJanuary 27, 2014. 5. Notice ofappeal was given on March 6, 2014. 6. The clerk's record was filed on April 16, 2014; the reporter's record

was filed onAugust 26, 2014.7. The appellate briefis presently due on April15, 2015. 8. Appellant requests an extension oftime of 15 days from the present date, i.e. May 1, 2015. 9. Two extensionsto file the briefhave beenreceived in this cause. 10. Defendant is currently not incarcerated for this offense. 11. Appellantrelies on the following facts as good cause for the requested extension: Attorney for Appellant is attending an out oftown CLE on Friday, April 17, 2015 and has anon-jury trial on Monday April20, 2015. WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Appellant prays that this Court grant this Motion To Extend Time to File Appellant's Brief, and for such other and further reliefas the Courtmay deem appropriate. Respectfully submitted, BOBBYDALE BARlNA 455 East Central Texas Expressway, Suite 104 HarkerHeights, Texas 76548 Tel: (254) 699-3755 Fax: (254) 699-1074 BobbyDaleBarina@BarinaLaw.com .//'

# _____**Bx~·~~--~~~----------------** Ty1 oudwyk ate BarNo. 24084120 bobbyda1ebarina@barina1aw.com Attorney for Larry Dewayne GarrettCERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 20 This is to certifythat on April_).?', 2015, a true and correct copy ofthe above and foregoing document was served on the County Attorney's Office, Bell County, 1201 HueyRoad, Bell CountyTexas, by fax to 254-933-5150.

TylerSTATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF BELL § § §

AFFIDAVIT BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, on this day personally appeared Tyler Woudwyk, who afterbeing duly sworn stated: "I am the attorney for the appellant in the above numbered and entitled cause. I have read the foregoing Motion To Extend Time to File Appellant's Brief and swear that all of the allegations of fact containedtherein are true and correct."

SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME on April 

### W, 2015, to
No. 62053.

#### Stern & Stern Textiles, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 205397-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items of the merchandise are the same in all material respects as those the subject of *E. C. Carter & Son, Inc.*v. *United States*(38 cust. Ct. 368, C. D. 1889), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
V *' 

# fO* 9-/5 .Uttl The- (Lout^oPCmi'mi iUa.L l^ppea.Ls <Dt T£3La_s 

### Pe.Tt'l7o«sa Gov- £»tiOre.+l(DA.ieiv-o[ ReM*'*.^ Pfc-t0t9-A5" 

# ORIGINAL

RECEIVED IN COURT OF CRIMINALAPPEALS NOV 20 2015 AbelAcosta, Clerk
nLHD IN COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS



### SO." AnftLcCja.KL4- ptTf)^G.'H-pp KOV 20 2S«5 Abel Acosta, Clerk
**Avis juridique important**

*|*

# 31998R0780

**Council Regulation (EC) No 780/98 of 7 April 1998 amending Regulation (EC) No 1488/96 as regards the procedure for adopting the appropriate measures where an essential element for the continuation of support measures for a Mediterranean Partner is lacking***Official Journal L 113 , 15/04/1998 P. 0003 - 0003*

COUNCIL REGULATION (EC) No 780/98 of 7 April 1998 amending Regulation (EC) No 1488/96 as regards the procedure for adopting the appropriate measures where an essential element for the continuation of support measures for a Mediterranean Partner is lacking

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 235 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Commission (1),

Having regard to the opinion of the European Parliament (2),

Whereas Article 3 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1488/96 of 23 July 1996 on financial and technical measures to accompany (MEDA) the reform of economic and social structures in the framework of the Euro-Mediterranean partnership (3) provides that the said Regulation is based on the respect for democratic principles and the rule of law and also for human rights and fundamental freedoms, which constitute an essential element thereof, the violation of which element will justify the adoption of appropriate measures;

Whereas Article 16 of Regulation (EC) No 1488/96 provides that the definitive procedure for adopting the appropriate measures where an essential element for the continuation of support measures to a Mediterranean partner is lacking is to be determined by 30 June 1997;

Whereas it is therefore necessary to amend Regulation (EC) No 1488/96 to determine such a procedure;

Whereas the Treaty has not provided, for the adoption of this Regulation, powers other than those of Article 235,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1 

Article 16 of Regulation (EC) No 1488/96 shall be replaced by the following:

'Article 16

When an essential element for the continuation of support measures to a Mediterranean partner is missing, the Council may, acting by a qualified majority on a proposal from the Commission, decide upon appropriate measures.`

Article 2 

This Regulation shall enter into force on the third day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Luxembourg, 7 April 1998.

For the Council

The President

D. BLUNKETT

(1) OJ C 386, 20. 12. 1997, p. 9.

(2) OJ C 104, 6. 4. 1998.

(3) OJ L 189, 30. 7. 1996, p. 1.