alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2017014EN.01003201.xml

| 16.1.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 14/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.1.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 14/32

---

Judgment of the General Court of 24 November 2016 — SeNaPro v EUIPO — Paltentaler Splitt & Marmorwerke (Dolokorn)

(Case T-769/15) (1)

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU word mark Dolokorn - Earlier EU word mark DOLOPUR - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2017/C 014/38)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: SeNaPro GmbH (Pommelsbrunn, Germany) (represented by: A. Schröder, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: E. Strittmatter and A. Folliard–Monguiral, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervening before the General Court: Paltentaler Splitt & Marmorwerke GmbH (Rottenmann, Austria) (represented by: C. Ofner, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 23 October 2015 (Case R 2643/2014-1), relating to opposition proceedings between Paltentaler Splitt & Marmorwerke and SeNaPro.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders SeNaPro GmbH to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders SeNaPro GmbH to pay the costs.

---

(1)  
  OJ C 78, 29.2.2016.

---
|                                      |
|--------------------------------------|
|                                      |  |
| Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas | BNY Mellon Trust of Delaware |
| As Indenture Trustee                 | As Owner Trustee |
| Attn:  Michelle H.Y. Voon  | Attn: Robert Castle / Kristine Gullo |
| 100 Plaza One 6th Floor         | 301 Bellevue Parkway, 3rd Floor |
| Jersey City, NJ 07311                | Wilmington, DE 19809 |

|                                                 |
|-------------------------------------------------|
|                                                 |  |
| The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. | Ally Auto Assets LLC |
| Attn:  Diane Moser                    | Ally Financial Inc. |
| 2 North LaSalle Street, Suite 1020              | 500 Woodward Ave |
| Chicago, IL  60602                    | Mail code:  MI-01-20-TRES |
|                                            | Detroit, MI 48226 |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |
| Re:    | Ally Auto Receivables Trust 2016-2 |
|   | Annual Statement as to Compliance |

|    |
|----|
|    |  |
| a. | A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period of January 1, 2018 through  December 31, 2018, and of its performance under the Servicing Agreement has been made under his supervision, and |

|    |
|----|
|    |  |
| b. | To the best of his knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement throughout such period. |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |
|   | Very truly yours, |
|   |   |
|   | /s/ David J. DeBrunner |   |
|   | David J. DeBrunner |
|   | Vice President, Controller & Chief Accounting Officer |
|   |   |
# C_2016200EN.01001502.xml

| 6.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 200/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 200/15

---

Order of the President of the Court of 9 March 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado Contencioso-Administrativo No 1 de Tarragona — Spain) — Correos y Telégrafos SA v Ayuntamiento de Vila Seca

(Case C-302/15) (1)

1

(2016/C 200/22)

Language of the case: Spanish

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 294, 7.9.2015.

1

---
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. 

# United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2009-1027, -1028 KARA TECHNOLOGY INCORPORATED,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v. STAMPS COM INC.,

Defendant-Cross Appellant. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Central District of California

in case no. 05-CV-1890, Judge Consuelo B. Marshall.

ON MOTION ORDER Upon consideration of Kara Technology Incorporated's first motion for an extension of time to file its brief, and its amended motion for an extension of time, IT IS ORDERED THAT: The amended motion is granted and Kara's opening brief is due no later than February 17, 2009.

Kara's first motion for an extension of time is moot. FOR THE COURT 

# FEB 1 3 2009 /s/ Jan Horbalv Jan Horbaly Clerk FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT FEB 1 3 2009 lklr titliwar CLERK Date

cc: Robert C. Sheinfeld, Esq. Philip J. Graves, Esq. s8
# C_2016038EN.01002001.xml

| 1.2.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 38/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.2.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 38/20

---

Order of the Court of 25 September 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Amsterdam — Netherlands) — Openbaar Ministerie v A.

(Case C-463/15 PPU) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Urgent preliminary-ruling procedure - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters - Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA - European arrest warrant - Article 2(4) and Article 4.1 - Conditions of execution - National criminal law making the execution of a European arrest warrant subject to, in addition to double criminality, the condition that the criminal act is punishable by a custodial sentence or a detention order for a maximum period of at least 12 months under the law of the executing Member State))

(2016/C 038/29)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Referring court

Rechtbank Amsterdam

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Openbaar Ministerie

Applicant:

Defendant: A.

Defendant:

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

Article 2(4) and Article 4.1 of Council Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA of 13 June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States, as amended by Council Framework Decision 2009/299/JHA of 26 February 2009, must be interpreted as precluding a situation in which surrender pursuant to a European arrest warrant is subject, in the executing Member State, not only to the condition that the act for which the arrest warrant was issued constitutes an offence under the law of that Member State, but also to the condition that it is, under that same law, punishable by a custodial sentence of a maximum of at least twelve months.

---

(1)  OJ C 363, 3.11.2015.

1

---
```

[Federal Register: January 22, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 14)]
[Notices]               
[Page 3781-3782]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr22ja10-101]                         

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 6883]

 
Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``The Mourners: Tomb Sculptures From the Court of 
Burgundy''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236 
of October 19, 1999, as amended, and Delegation of Authority No. 257 of 
April 15, 2003 [68 FR 19875], I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``The Mourners: Tomb Sculptures from the 
Court of Burgundy,'' imported from abroad for temporary exhibition 
within the United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are 
imported pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign owners or 
custodians. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the 
exhibit objects at the Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, NY, from 
on or about March 1, 2010, until on or about May 23, 2010; the St. 
Louis Art Museum, St. Louis, MO, from on or about June 20, 2010, until 
on or about September 6, 2010; the Dallas Museum of Art, Dallas, TX, 
from on or about October 3, 2010 until on or about January 2, 2011; the 
Minneapolis Institute of Arts, Minneapolis, MN, from on or about 
January 23, 2011, until on or about April 17, 2011; the Los Angeles 
County Museum of Art, Los Angeles, CA, from on or about May 8, 2011, 
until on or about July 31, 2011; the Fine Arts Museums of San 
Francisco, San Francisco, CA, from on or about August 21, 2011, until 
on or about January 1, 2012; the Virginia Museum of Fine Arts, 
Richmond, VA, from on or about January 20, 2012, until on or about 
April 15, 2012; and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to 
be determined, is in the national interest. Public Notice of these 
Determinations is ordered to be published in the Federal Register.

[[Page 3782]]


FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Carol B. Epstein, Attorney-
Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State 
(telephone: 202/632-6473). The address is U.S.
    Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, Fifth Floor, Washington, DC 20522-
0505.

    Dated: January 14, 2010.
Maura M. Pally,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Professional and Cultural Exchanges, 
Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2010-1217 Filed 1-21-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
(V. D. 16)

Entry Nos. 849443; 861816.

#### American Thermo-Ware Company *v.*United States

(Decided April 13, 1955)

*Walter Auster*for the plaintiff.

*Warren E. Burger,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Wilson, Judge:

These matters are presently before me on a remand from a classification proceeding decided by the first division of this court in *American Thermo-Ware Company*v. *United States,*33 Cust. Ct. 472, Abstract 58617. The judgment entered therein stated: “* * * that the matter be remanded to a single judge in reappraisement pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 U. S. C. § 2636 (d).” •

*428The matter has been submitted for decision upon an agreed statement of facts entered into by and between counsel for the respective parties hereto.

Upon the agreed facts, I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. § 1402 (d)), to be the proper basis for determining the values of the involved merchandise and that such values are as set forth in schedule “A,” hereto attached and made a part hereof.

I further find such values to be the dutiable values of said merchandise.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.

*United States dollars per each*Schedule A” *Remand of Entry protest No. No. Merchandise*

233546-K/19701-53 849443 1 lot containing 100 pcs. 7 x 35 e. f. binoculars with cases

14. 55 Binoculars each_

1. 25 Carrying cases each_

1 lot containing 50 pcs. 7 x 35 i. f. binoculars with cases

9. 75 Binoculars each_

1. 00 Carrying cases each_

1 lot containing 50 pcs. 8 x 30 binoculars with cases

Binoculars each_ CO o O

Carrying cases each_ O CO Cn

1 lot containing 12 pcs. 16 x 50 binoculars with cases

14. 50 Binoculars each_

1. 25 Carrying cases each_

861816 1 lot containing 150 pcs. 7 x 18 binoculars with cases

Binoculars each_ O CD

Carrying cases each_ O lO
# C_2016326EN.01002601.xml

| 5.9.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.9.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/26

---

Judgment of the General Court of 14 July 2016 — Modas Cristal v EUIPO — Zorlu Tekstil Ürünleri Pazarlama (KRISTAL)

(Case T-345/15) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative mark KRISTAL - Earlier national word and figurative marks MODAS CRISTAL and home CRISTAL - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2016/C 326/46)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Modas Cristal, SL (Santa Lucía, Spain) (represented by: E Manresa Medina, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Muñiz Rodríguez and A. Schifko, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Zorlu Tekstil Ürünleri Pazarlama Anonim Sirketi (Denizli, Turkey)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 24 April 2015 (Case R 341/2014-5), relating to opposition proceedings between Modas Cristal and Zorlu Tekstil Ürünleri Pazarlama.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Modas Cristal, SL to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Modas Cristal, SL to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 302, 14.9.2015.

1

---
# C_2016410EN.01004001.xml

| 7.11.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 410/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.11.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 410/40

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (3rd Chamber) of 15 June 2016 — Marinozzi v Commission

(Case F-39/15) (1)

1

((Civil service - Members of the contract staff - Pensions - Transfer of national pension rights - Proposals concerning additional pensionable years - Act not having an adverse effect - Inadmissibility of the action - Application for a decision not going to the substance of the case - Article 83 of the Rules of Procedure))

(2016/C 410/71)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Gabrio Marinozzi (Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic) (represented by: J.-N. Louis and N. de Montigny, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and G. Gattinara, Agents, then G. Gattinara, Agent, and, lastly, G. Gattinara and F. Simonetti, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of the proposal to transfer the applicant’s pension rights to the EU pension scheme which applies the new general implementing provisions (GIP) of 3 March 2011 for Article 11(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed.

| 2. | Mr Gabrio Marinozzi shall bear his own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Mr Gabrio Marinozzi shall bear his own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 178, 1/6/2015, p. 27.

1

---
Exhibit 12.1
 UAL Corporation and Subsidiary Companies
 Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
 and Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividend Requirements
 Three Months EndedMarch 31,(In millions)
    
    2009
    
    
    2008Adjusted (e)Earnings (loss):Loss before income taxes & adjustments for minority interest
and equity earnings in affiliates
    
    $
    (412
    )
    
    $
    (554
    )Add (deduct):Fixed charges, from below
    
    
    222
    
    
    
    190Distributed earnings of affiliates
    
    
    1
    
    
    
    Interest capitalized
    
    
    (3
    )
    
    
    (5
    )Loss as adjusted
    
    $
    (192
    )
    
    $
    (369
    )Fixed charges:Interest expensed and capitalized and amortization
of debt discounts and issuance costs (a)
    
    $
    134
    
    
    $
    147Portion of rental expense representative
of the interest factor
    
    
    88
    
    
    
    43Fixed charges, as above
    
    
    222
    
    
    
    190Preferred stock dividend requirements (pre-tax) (b)
    
    
    
    
    
    
    2Fixed charges including preferred stock dividends
    
    $
    222
    
    
    $
    192Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
    
    
    (c
    )
    
    
    (d
    )Ratio of earnings to fixed charges and preferred dividend requirements
    
    
    (c
    )
    
    
    (d
    )
 (a)
    
    Amortization of debt discounts includes amortization of fresh-start valuation
discounts.(b)
    
    The Company had an immaterial tax rate in the 2008 period and did not adjust its
preferred stock dividends.(c)
    
    Earnings were inadequate to cover fixed charges by $414 million for the three months
ended March 31, 2009.(d)
    
    Earnings were inadequate to cover fixed charges and fixed charges and preferred
dividend requirements by $559 million and $561 million, respectively, for the three months
ended March 31, 2008.(e)
    
    In accordance with a new accounting standard that became effective January 1, 2009,
the amounts reported for 2008 have been retrospectively adjusted. Retrospective adoption
was required as discussed in Note 2, New Accounting Pronouncements, in Combined Notes to
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited).
EXHIBIT 32.2
                                                                    ------------


                         CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906
                                     OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Unico American
Corporation (the "Company") for the period ended June 30, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission as of the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Lester A. Aaron, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
    the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



                    /s/  Lester A. Aaron
                    --------------------
           Name:    Lester A. Aaron
           Title:   Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
           Date:    August 12, 2004




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Unico American Corporation, and
will be retained by Unico American Corporation, and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 

          - [Docket No. RP07-167-002] 

Take notice that on April 17, 2007, Petal Gas Storage, L.L.C. (Petal) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Original Volume No. 1, Second Substitute Second Revised Sheet No. 140, to become effective March 6, 2007. 

Any person desiring to protest this filing must file in accordance with Rule 211 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211). Protests to this filing will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Such protests must be filed in accordance with the provisions of Section 154.210 of the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 154.210). Anyone filing a protest must serve a copy of that document on all the parties to the proceeding. 

                    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests in lieu of paper using the “eFiling” link at                     *http://www.ferc.gov*. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 14 copies of the protest to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.                 

                    This filing is accessible on-line at                     *http://www.ferc.gov*, using the “eLibrary” link and is available for review in the Commission's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an “eSubscription” link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail                     *FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov*, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.                 

Kimberly D. Bose, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. E7-7987 Filed 4-25-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
(Reap. Dec. 9381)

#### Plywood & Door Northern Corporation *v.*United States

Entry No. 843131, etc.

(Decided April 7, 1959)

*J ames Wilson Young*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Mollison, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement enmnerated in the attached schedule of reappraisements relate to plywood, exported from Finland in the year 1956, and were submitted for decision upon a stipulation of counsel for the parties.

On the agreed facts, I find foreign value, as defined in section 402 (c), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise involved, and that such value, except for the items of merchandise set forth in schedule “B,” hereto attached, is, in each instance, the appraised unit value, less 4 per centum, net, packed.

The appeals for reappraisement having been abandoned insofar as they relate to the merchandise specified in said schedule “B,” they are, to that extent, dismissed.

Judgment will issue accordingly.

*592Schedule B

Reappraisement No. Collector’s No. Entry No. Date of Export

R58/4724 01413 843131 12/15/56

Birch plywood as follows:

R58/5335 01741 791808 10/12/56

Birch plywood as follows:

R58/5339 01746 834893 11/26/56

Birch plywood as follows:

BP/BB grade *%"*thick, 60" x 48"

BJ/BB grade thick, 48" x 36"

BP/BB grade, *%"*thick 60" x 48"

BJ/BJ grade, 5mm thick *14%"*x 44"

BP/BB grade, *%"*thick, 60" x 48"
Case: 2:13-cv-00021-EAS-TPK Doc #: 19 Filed: 03/20/14 Page: 1 of 2  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:13-cv-00021-EAS-TPK Doc #: 19 Filed: 03/20/14 Page: 2 of 2  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-11T17:53:34-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO