alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[House Report 110-661]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

110th Congress                                                   Report
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 2d Session                                                     110-661

======================================================================

 
   PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF THE BILL (H.R. 5658) TO AUTHORIZE 
  APPROPRIATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2009 FOR MILITARY ACTIVITIES OF THE 
 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, TO PRESCRIBE MILITARY PERSONNEL STRENGTHS FOR 
                FISCAL YEAR 2009, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES

                                _______
                                

May 20, 2008.--Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

                                _______
                                

  Mr. Hastings of Florida, from the Committee on Rules, submitted the 
                               following

                              R E P O R T

                      [To accompany H. Res. 1213]

    The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration 
House Resolution 1213, by a non-record vote, report the same to 
the House with the recommendation that the resolution be 
adopted.

                SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

    The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 5658, the 
``Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 
Year 2009.'' The resolution provides for two hours of general 
debate equally divided and controlled by the chairman and 
ranking minority member of the Committee on Armed Services.
    The resolution waives all points of order against 
consideration of the bill except those arising under clause 9 
or 10 of rule XXI. The resolution provides that the Committee 
of the Whole shall rise without motion after general debate. 
Finally, the resolution prohibits further consideration of the 
bill except pursuant to a subsequent order of the House.

                         EXPLANATION OF WAIVERS

    The waiver of all points of order against consideration of 
the bill (except those arising under clause 9 or 10 of rule 
XXI) includes waivers of: (1) clause 3(e) of rule XIII 
(indicating changes to existing law); (2) clause 4(a) of rule 
XIII (regarding three-day availability of the committee 
report); and (3) section 303 of the Congressional Budget Act 
(mistimed changes in direct spending).

                                  

```
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 71 (Monday, April 14, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 20960]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-08336]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8692]

Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Gods and Heroes: Masterpieces From the [Eacute]cole 
des Beaux-Arts, Paris'' Exhibition

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 
of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority No. 
257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``Gods and Heroes: Masterpieces from the 
[Eacute]cole des Beaux-Arts, Paris,'' imported from abroad for 
temporary exhibition within the United States, are of cultural 
significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan agreements with 
the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that the exhibition 
or display of the exhibit objects at the Oklahoma City Museum of Art, 
Oklahoma City, OK, from on or about June 19, 2014, until on or about 
September 14, 2014; the Albuquerque Museum of Art and History; 
Albuquerque, NM, from on or about October 12, 2014, until on or about 
January 4, 2015; Artis-Naples, The Baker Museum, Naples, FL, from on or 
about February 19, 2015, until on or about May 17, 2015; the Portland 
Art Museum, Portland, OR, from on or about June 13, 2015, until on or 
about September 13, 2015, and at possible additional exhibitions or 
venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. I have 
ordered that Public Notice of these Determinations be published in the 
Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including 
lists of the exhibit objects, contact Julie Simpson, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6467). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, 
Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: April 7, 2014.
Kelly Keiderling,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2014-08336 Filed 4-11-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
# C_2017038EN.01003202.xml

| 6.2.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 38/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.2.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 38/32

---

Judgment of the General Court of 15 December 2016 — Novartis v EUIPO (Representation of a grey curve and representation of a green curve)

(Joined Cases T-678/15 and T-679/15) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Applications for EU figurative trade marks representing a grey curve and representing a green curve - Absolute ground for refusal - Distinctive character - Simplicity of the sign - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2017/C 038/44)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Novartis AG (Basel, Switzerland) (represented by: M. Zintler, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: H. Kunz and S. Hanne, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Two actions brought against the decisions of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 23 September 2015 (Cases R 78/2015-5 and R 89/2015-5), concerning applications for registration of two figurative signs, representing a grey curve and representing a green curve, as EU trade marks.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decisions of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 23 September 2015 (Cases R 78/2015-5 and R 89/2015-5); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decisions of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 23 September 2015 (Cases R 78/2015-5 and R 89/2015-5);

| 2. | Allows the appeals brought by Novartis AG before that Board of Appeal; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Allows the appeals brought by Novartis AG before that Board of Appeal;

| 3. | Orders EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders EUIPO to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 90, 7.3.2016.

1

---
# Official Journal C 2/2020

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 2 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 636 January 2020 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 2

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 636 January 2020

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2020/C 2/01 | Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations: 0,00 % on 1 January 2020 — Euro exchange rates | 1 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2020/C 2/01

Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations: 0,00 % on 1 January 2020 — Euro exchange rates

1

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2020/C 2/02 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.9658 — Daiwa Securities Group/Aquila Holding/Aquila Capital Holding) Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 2 |
| 2020/C 2/03 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.9687 — CPPIB/OTPP/IDEAL) Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 4 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2020/C 2/02

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.9658 — Daiwa Securities Group/Aquila Holding/Aquila Capital Holding) Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

2

2020/C 2/03

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.9687 — CPPIB/OTPP/IDEAL) Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

4

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
# C_2016243EN.01003102.xml

| 4.7.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 243/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.7.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 243/31

---

Judgment of the General Court of 24 May 2016 — El Corte Inglés v EUIPO — Grup Supeco Maxor (Supeco)

(Case T-126/15) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative mark Supeco - Earlier EU figurative mark SUPER COR - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Extent of the examination carried out by the Board of Appeal - Goods and services on which the opposition is based - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Rule 15(2)(f) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 - Communication No 2/12))

(2016/C 243/33)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: El Corte Inglés, SA (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: J.L. Rivas Zurdo, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) (represented by: E. Scheffer and A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Grup Supeco Maxor, SL (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: S. Martínez-Almeida y Alejos-Pita, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 4 December 2014 (Case R 1112/2014-5) relating to opposition proceedings between El Corte Inglés, SA and Grup Supeco Maxor, SL.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders El Corte Inglés, SA to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders El Corte Inglés, SA to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 155, 11.5.2015.

1

---
# C_2015414EN.01002201.xml

| 14.12.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 414/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.12.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 414/22

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Bergamo (Italy) lodged on 1 October 2015 — Criminal proceedings against Luca Menci

(Case C-524/15)

(2015/C 414/27)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunale di Bergamo

Party to the main proceedings

Party to the main proceedings

Luca Menci

Question referred

Question referred

Does Article 50 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, interpreted in the light of Article 4 of Protocol No 7 to the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms and the related case-law of the European Court of Human Rights, preclude the possibility of conducting criminal proceedings concerning an act (non-payment of VAT) for which a definitive administrative penalty has been imposed on the defendant?

---
INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 12-0274

Focus Ready Draft 4/16/2012

ENGINEER: Macek \ AG

PV (kg/yr): 

SUBMITTER: 

USE: 

OTHER USES:

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 7
CRSS :

EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 7
Consumer Use: 

SAT (concerns) (04/10/2012):

Related Cases and Related Cases and Misc SAT Info:

Ecotox Related Cases: Analogs

Migration to groundwater: PMN: negl // moderate

PBT rating: P1B1T2 PMN: P1B1T2 // P1B1

Health: 2 Dermal, Drinking Water, Inhalation

Eco: 1 No releases to Water

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 2C

NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS:

Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER.

POLLUTION PREVENTION CONSIDERATIONS:

EPA SANITIZED Page 3 of 7
P2 Claims: 

EXPOSURE-BASED REVIEW: 

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 12-0274

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

IRER Note: The daily releases listed for any source below

may coincide with daily releases from the other sources

to the same medium.

EPA SANITIZED Page 4 of 7
OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 12-0274

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

IRER Note: The daily releases listed for any source below

EPA SANITIZED Page 5 of 7
may coincide with daily releases from the other sources

to the same medium.

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

EPA SANITIZED Page 6 of 7
Inhalation:

 

 

 

 

Dermal:

EPA SANITIZED Page 7 of 7
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the 
Company's Balance Sheet as of March 31, 1997 and the Statement Of Income
for the period ended March 31, 1997, and is qualified in its entirety by 
reference to such financial statements.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          84,124
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                84,124
<PP&E>                                       7,995,908
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,878,473
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,226,354<F1>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           44,133<F2>
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (650,322)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,226,354<F3>
<SALES>                                        267,289<F4>
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               267,289
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                16,957<F5>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              67,117
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                183,215
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            183,215
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   183,215
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   254.47<F6>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   254.47<F6>
<FN>
<F1>Includes unamortized mortgage refinancing costs
<F2>Accrued interest on mortgage, and first mortgage principal payments 
    due within one year
<F3>Includes long-term debt 
<F4>Rental income includes basic rent and advance of primary overage rent
<F5>Supervisory services and amortization of mortgage refinance costs
<F6>Earnings per $5,000 participation unit, based on 720 participation units
    outstanding during the period
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
THIRD AMENDMENT TO THE
                                 MICROAGE, INC.
                       1995 ASSOCIATE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN


     Effective  March  15,  1995,  the  shareholders  of  MicroAge,   Inc.  (the
"Company")  approved the adoption of the  MicroAge,  Inc. 1995  Associate  Stock
Purchase  Plan (the  "Plan").  By the First  Amendment to the Plan,  the Company
amended the Plan to make various technical  changes.  By the Second Amendment to
the Plan, the Company  amended the Plan to change the "purchase  date" of shares
of Common Stock.  By this  instrument,  the Company desires to amend the Plan to
increase  the number of shares of Common Stock  reserved for issuance  under the
Plan.

     1. This Third Amendment shall amend only that Section  specified herein and
those Sections not amended hereby shall remain in full force and effect.

     2. Section 4 is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as follows:

          4. STOCK SUBJECT TO PLAN.  Subject to adjustment as provided
          below,  the total  number of  shares of Stock  reserved  and
          available  for issuance or which may be  otherwise  acquired
          upon  exercise  of  Purchase  Rights  under the Plan will be
          1,000,000.  Any  shares of Stock  delivered  by the  Company
          under  the  Plan  may  consist,  in  whole  or in  part,  of
          authorized  and  unissued  shares or  treasury  shares.  The
          number and kind of such shares of Stock  subject to the Plan
          will  be  proportionately  adjusted,  as  determined  by the
          Board, in the event of any  extraordinary  dividend or other
          distribution,  recapitalization,  forward or reverse  split,
          reorganization,     merger,     consolidation,     spin-off,
          combination, repurchase, or share exchange, or other similar
          corporate transaction or event affecting the Stock.

     3.  The  provisions  of  this  Third   Amendment  shall  be  effective  for
Subscription Periods beginning on or after March 31, 1999.

         IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  the Company has caused this Third Amendment to be
executed as of this 3rd day of December, 1998.

                                           MICROAGE, INC.



                                           By: /s/ Jeffrey D. McKeever
                                              ---------------------------
                                              Jeffrey D. McKeever
                                              Chairman of the Board and
                                              Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Regency
Affiliates, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Laurence S. Levy, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as
      of the dates presented and the consolidated result of operations of the
      Company for the periods presented.

Dated: August 21, 2006


/s/ Laurence S. Levy
--------------------------------------
Laurence S. Levy
President and Chief Executive Officer
# C_2015328EN.01003701.xml

| 5.10.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 328/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.10.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 328/37

---

Action brought on 17 August 2015 — ZZ v OHIM

(Case F-116/15)

(2015/C 328/35)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: H. Tettenborn, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision to transfer the applicant from the department ‘International Cooperation and Legal Affairs’ to the department ‘Operations’

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul OHIM’s decision of 2 October 2014 to transfer the applicant from the ‘International Cooperation and Legal Affairs’ department to the ‘Operations’ department; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul OHIM’s decision of 2 October 2014 to transfer the applicant from the ‘International Cooperation and Legal Affairs’ department to the ‘Operations’ department;

| — | Order the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) to pay the costs.

---
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 123 

Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the District of Columbia 

Special Olympics Law Enforcement Torch Run. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 20, 2007 

Ms. NORTON (for herself, Mr. GRAVES, Mr. HOYER, Mr. MORAN of Virginia, 

Mr. VAN HOLLEN, Mr. CUMMINGS, Mr. WYNN, Mr. WOLF, and Mr. TOM

DAVIS of Virginia) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which 

was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the District 

of Columbia Special Olympics Law Enforcement Torch Run. 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), 

3 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF USE OF CAPITOL 

4 GROUNDS FOR D.C. SPECIAL OLYMPICS LAW 

5 ENFORCEMENT TORCH RUN. 

6 On June 8, 2007, or on such other date as the Speak7 er of the House of Representatives and the Committee on 

8 Rules and Administration of the Senate may jointly des9 ignate, the 2007 District of Columbia Special Olympics 


hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS
2 

•HCON 123 IH 

1 Law Enforcement Torch Run (in this resolution referred 

2 to as the ‘‘event’’) may be run through the Capitol 

3 Grounds as part of the journey of the Special Olympics 

4 torch to the District of Columbia Special Olympics sum5 mer games. 

6 SEC. 2. RESPONSIBILITY OF CAPITOL POLICE BOARD. 

7 The Capitol Police Board shall take such actions as 

8 may be necessary to carry out the event. 

9 SEC. 3. CONDITIONS RELATING TO PHYSICAL PREPARA10 TIONS. 

11 The Architect of the Capitol may prescribe conditions 

12 for physical preparations for the event. 

13 SEC. 4. ENFORCEMENT OF RESTRICTIONS. 

14 The Capitol Police Board shall provide for enforce15 ment of the restrictions contained in section 5104(c) of 

16 title 40, United States Code, concerning sales, advertise17 ments, displays, and solicitations on the Capitol Grounds, 

18 as well as other restrictions applicable to the Capitol 

19 Grounds, in connection with the event. 

Æ 


hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS