alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

330 

CA 14-01449 

PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, VALENTINO, AND WHALEN, JJ. 

 

LAURIE R. MILLER AND GEORGE K. MILLER, DOING 

BUSINESS AS PINE HILL STABLES, 

PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

DORIS LUDWIG, ET AL., DEFENDANTS, 

AND MARY MORRISON, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

 

LAW OFFICE OF TONIE M. FRANZESE, P.C., NORTHVILLE, MICHIGAN (TONIE M.

FRANZESE, OF THE MICHIGAN AND CALIFORNIA BARS, ADMITTED PRO HAC VICE,

OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

CHRISTOPHER C. SHAMBO, BALLSTON SPA (ALEXANDER PHENGSIAROUN OF

COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS.

 

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Steuben County (Joseph

W. Latham, A.J.), dated March 28, 2014. The order, in essence, denied

the motion of defendant Mary Morrison for leave to reargue a prior

motion to dismiss. 

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed 

without costs.

Memorandum: Although defendant-appellant purports to appeal from

an order denying a motion to dismiss, the record establishes that she

is actually appealing from an order denying a motion for leave to

reargue a prior motion to dismiss. It is well settled that no appeal

lies from an order denying a motion for leave to reargue (see MidFirst

Bank v Storto, 121 AD3d 1575, 1575; Britt v Buffalo Mun. Hous. Auth.,

115 AD3d 1252, 1252).

Entered: March 20, 2015 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
(logo) BERKADIA®

 

 

Annual Statement as to Compliance

For the Year Ended December 31, 2021

 

*Morgan Stanley Capital, I Trust,*

*Series 2016-UBS9*

 

Pursuant to Section 3.06 (f)of the Subservicing Agreement governing the referenced transaction (the“Servicing Agreement”), I hereby attest that:

 

        i.           A review of the activities andperformance of Berkadia as Subservicer during the period has been made under mysupervision.

 

      ii.           To the best of my knowledge, basedon such review, Berkadia as Subservicer has fulfilled, in all materialrespects, its obligations under this Subservicing Agreement throughout theperiod and no default by the Subservicer under the Subservicing Agreement hasoccurred and is continuing.

 

Berkadia,

 

/s/ Mark E. McCool

Mark E. McCool 

President 

February 10, 2022
Aris Industries, Inc. Certification under Section 906 of the Sarbanes/Oxley Act
- Filed as an Exhibit to 10-Q for the Quarter Ended March 31, 2003

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Aris Industries, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof ("Report"), I, Paul
Spector, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.




/s/ Paul Spector
----------------------------------
Paul Spector
Chief Financial Officer
May 13, 2003


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Aris Industries, Inc. and will be retained by Aris Industries, Inc.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
CONSULTING  AGREEMENT
                                    ---------------------

     CONSULTING  AGREEMENT  dated  as  of  January  24,  2000  between GO ONLINE
NETWORKS  CORPORATION,  a  Delaware  corporation,  ("GONT"),  and  PETER PENSA
("Pensa").

     WHEREAS:

     A.     Pensa has agreed to render consulting services with regard to the
Preparation and printing of certain materials on behalf of GONT.

B. GONT desires to obtain the consulting services from Pensa and to
compensate  Pensa  for  his  consulting services.

     NOW  THEREFORE,  it  is  agreed:

     1.     Compensation.  GONT  shall  pay  and cause to be issued to Pensa a
            ------------
consulting fee of 250,000  shares  of  common  stock  of  GONT (the "Shares").
such shares shall be subject toregistration by GONT on Form S-8, at GONT's
sole expense

     2.     Miscellaneous.  This  Agreement (i) shall be governed by the laws of
            -------------
the  State  of  California;  (ii)  may be executed in counterparts each of which
shall  constitute  an  original;  (iii)  shall  be  binding upon the successors,
representatives, agents, officers and directors of the parties; and (iv) may not
be  modified  or  changed  except  in  a  writing  signed  by  all  parties.

     This  Consulting  Agreement  has  been  executed as of the date first above
written.


                                  GO  ONLINE  NETWORKS  CORPORATION


                                  By:  /s/ Joseph M. Naughton
                              Joseph  M.  Naughton,  Chief  Executive Officer

                              PETER PENSA

                                /s/ Peter Pensa
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 73 (Tuesday, April 17, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 19209]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-7240]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration


Statement of Organization, Functions, and Delegations of 
Authority

    Part M of the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services 
Administration (SAMHSA) Statement of Organization, Functions, and 
Delegations of Authority for the Department of Health and Human 
Services at 72, Number 62, page 15708, April 2, 2007 is amended to 
reflect a title correction. The title for the Center for Substance 
Abuse Treatment (MT), Division of State and Community Systems 
Development (MTE) is replaced with the following: Division of State and 
Community Assistance (MTE).
    Delegations of Authority. All delegations and redelegations of 
authority to officers and employees of SAMHSA which were in effect 
immediately prior to the effective date of this reorganization shall 
continue to be in effect pending further redelegations, providing they 
are consistent with the reorganization.
    These organizational changes are effective April 10, 2007.

    Dated: April 10, 2007.
Terry L. Cline,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. E7-7240 Filed 4-16-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-P
(Reap. Dec. 8989)

Entry No. A-779, etc.

#### F. H. Kaysing *v.*United States

(Decided September 11, 1957)

*Tompkins & Tompkins*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

OliveR, Chief Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement enumerated in schedule “A,” hereto attached and made a part hereof, relate to certain switchgear and parts thereof exported from Germany and entered at Kansas City, Mo.

The cases are before me on a written stipulation of submission establishing that the proper basis for appraisement of the switchgear and parts thereof, represented by the invoice items marked *“A”*and initialed “EFK,” is cost of production, as defined in section 402 (f) of the Tariff Act of 1930, and that such statutory value for the merchandise so identified is the “invoiced unit prices in U. S. dollars, packing included, less postage, inland freight and charges, consular fee, insurance, ocean freight, as invoiced, where specified on the invoices as being included in the invoice prices.” As to other merchandise, not hereinabove identified and included on any of the invoices covered by these appeals for reappraisement, the appraised value is affirmed. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                         9
<MULTIPLIER>                                  1,000
       
<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-1-1996
<PERIOD-END>                            SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                      184,770
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          524
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                            100,398
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                  0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 840,061
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       48,446
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                         49,585
<LOANS>                                   3,068,910
<ALLOWANCE>                                  45,837
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            4,366,324
<DEPOSITS>                                3,935,650
<SHORT-TERM>                                 39,437
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          47,108
<LONG-TERM>                                   2,815
<COMMON>                                     97,061
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                  244,253
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>            4,366,324
<INTEREST-LOAN>                             201,256
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            38,469
<INTEREST-OTHER>                              2,661
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            242,386
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                          108,711
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          110,258
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                       132,128
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                 6,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             (134)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                             110,160
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              54,435
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   54,435
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                 35,229
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 1.460
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 1.460
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                4.610
<LOANS-NON>                                   2,769
<LOANS-PAST>                                  6,388
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                  0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                               9,157
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             43,464
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                 6,329
<RECOVERIES>                                  2,702
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            45,837
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         40,049
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                               0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                       5,788
        

</TABLE>
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

October 11, 2021

No. 04-21-00171-CV

Leticia RODRIGUEZ 

Appellant/Cross-Appellee

v.

Lydia RODRIGUEZ and Robert Pereida 

Appellees/Cross-Appellants

From the 224th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017CI19456

Honorable Cynthia Marie Chapa, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

On September 20, 2021, appellee/cross-appellant Robert Pereida’s counsel, Sergio R. 

Davila and Olga G. Brown, filed a motion to withdraw as counsel for appellee/cross-appellant 

Robert Pereida. The motion complies with the requirements of Texas Rule of Appellate 

Procedure 6.5, and it has been on file for more than ten days. See TEX. R. APP. P. 6.5(a), (b); id. 

R. 10.3(a). Neither appellant/cross-appellee Leticia Rodriguez nor appellees/cross-appellants

Lydia Rodriguez and Robert Pereida have filed any objection or other response to the motion. 

After consideration, the motion to withdraw is GRANTED. We ORDER Sergio R. 

Davila and Olga G. Brown to “immediately notify [appellee/cross-appellant Robert Pereida], in 

writing, of any deadlines or settings that the attorney knows about at the time of withdrawal but 

that were not previously disclosed to” appellee/cross-appellant Robert Pereida and to file a copy 

of that notice with the clerk of this court. Id. R. 6.5(c). 

Appellee/cross-appellant Robert Pereida’s brief is now due. If appellee/cross-appellant 

Robert Pereida wishes to file a motion for extension of time, he must do so within 10 days of the 

date of this order. If appellee/cross-appellant Robert Pereida fails to file his brief or a motion for 

extension of time within 10 days of the date of this order, we will dismiss his cross-appeal for 

want of prosecution and we will set the case at issue without his appellee’s brief. See id. R.

38.8(a); see also id. R. 42.3(c). 
_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 11th day of October, 2021.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
Certifications

I, Richard Simpson, certify that:


1.	I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Trust 2016-P3 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);


2.	Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;


3.	Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;


4.	Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and


5.	All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.


In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:  Wells Fargo Bank, National Association; Greystone Servicing Company LLC; Park Bridge Lender Services LLC; U.S. Bank National Association; CoreLogic Solutions, LLC; Principal Real Estate Investors, LLC; KeyBank National Association; Computershare Trust Company, National Association; Pentalpha Surveillance LLC; Trimont Real Estate Advisors, LLC; Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC; Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association;and Wilmington Trust, National Association.

Date:	March 31, 2023

/s/ Richard Simpson ___________________Richard SimpsonPresident, Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc.(senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)

CGCMT 2016-P3 Certifications

---
Exhibit 35.1



Servicer Compliance Statement of AmeriCredit Financial Services,
Inc.





This Annual Statement as to Compliance
is delivered to you pursuant to Section 4.10 (a) of the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of April
6, 2016 (the “Agreement”) and Item 1123 of Regulation AB, executed in connection with the formation of AmeriCredit
Automobile Receivables Trust 2016-2 (the “Trust”), the issuance of the Notes by the
Trust and the closing of the transactions and the execution and delivery of the various documents by AmeriCredit Financial Services,
Inc. (the “Servicer”) and AFS SenSub Corp. in connection therewith. The capitalized
terms used herein shall have the same meanings as in the Agreement.







The undersigned certifies
that I am the Executive Vice President, Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer of the Servicer. I further certify as
follows:





| | 1. | I have conducted, or caused to be conducted under my supervision, a review of the Servicer during
the preceding period from January 1, 2018 through December 31, 2018,
and its performance under the Agreement.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, following such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations
under the Agreement throughout such period, and, to the best of my knowledge, there has been no default in the fulfillment of any
such obligation.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. |                                                                            
|------------------------------------ | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                     |                                                                            
|By:                                  | /s/ Connie Coffey                                                          
|                                     | Connie Coffey                                                              
|                                     | Executive Vice President, Corporate
Controller and Chief Accounting
Officer
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 10 

Expressing the sense of the Congress that the tax giveaway since 2001 

to the wealthiest 5 percent of Americans should be repealed and those 

monies instead invested in vital programs to relieve the growing burden 

on the working poor and to alleviate poverty in America. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 4, 2007 

Ms. LEE submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to 

the Committee on Ways and Means 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the Congress that the tax giveaway 

since 2001 to the wealthiest 5 percent of Americans 

should be repealed and those monies instead invested 

in vital programs to relieve the growing burden on the 

working poor and to alleviate poverty in America. 

Whereas the number of persons living in poverty has risen 

every year since 2001 when massive tax breaks for the 

wealthy began; 

Whereas there were 37,000,000 people living in poverty in 

2004, an increase of 5,400,000 during the administration 

of President George W. Bush; 

Whereas in 2003 over 12,900,000 children lived in poverty; 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
2 

•HCON 10 IH 

Whereas in 2003 15,600,000 persons lived in extreme poverty, defined as people with incomes lower than one-half 

of the established Federal poverty guideline; 

Whereas the number of Americans lacking health insurance 

rose to 45,800,000 in 2004, meaning that more Americans are now without health insurance than at any point 

since the Census Bureau began collecting comparable 

data in 1987; 

Whereas for the years 2002 through 2005, the tax cuts for 

the wealthiest 5 percent of Americans has cost an estimated $352,600,000,000 in Federal revenue; 

Whereas budget deficits jumped from $32,500,000,000 in 

2001 to $317,500,000,000 in 2002 primarily due to a 

precipitous drop in lost tax revenue; 

Whereas $352,600,000,000 could have provided Head Start 

enrollment costs for an average of 11,675,496 students 

annually for the years 2002 through 2005; 

Whereas $352,600,000,000 could have provided health insurance coverage for an average of 20,020,440 uninsured 

Americans annually for the years 2002 through 2005; 

Whereas $352,600,000,000 could have provided college tuition for an average of 17,093,271 university students annually for the years 2002 through 2005; and 

Whereas $352,600,000,000 could have provided 3,174,831 

new low income housing units: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that— 

3 (1) the portion of all tax cuts enacted in or 

4 after 2001 which benefits the wealthiest top 5 perVerDate Aug 31 2005 03:52 Jan 07, 2007 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\HC10.IH HC10

bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
3 

•HCON 10 IH 

1 cent of Americans and burdens the Nation’s impov2 erished and working poor with rising debt and fewer 

3 services should be repealed, and 

4 (2) the revenues from such repeal be used to re5 lieve such burdens and alleviate poverty in America. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
No. 44219.

#### Protests 824475-G, etc., of Henry Pollak, Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Brown, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is bodies, hoods, forms, or shapes similar to those the subject of *Cohn*v. *United States*(4 Cust. Ct. 166, C. D. 314). The protests were therefore sustained.
|   |
|---|
|   |  |
| 1 | I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Chiquita Brands International, Inc.; |

|   |
|---|
|   |  |
| 2 | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |

|                        |
|------------------------|
|                        |  |  |
|                   |   |   |
| Date: February 6, 2012 |   | /s/ Fernando Aguirre |
|                   |   | Title:    Chief Executive Officer |
Exhibit 10.13


 


An English Summary of the Material Provisions
of a Hebrew Document Titled 


“A Request for a Loan in a Foreign
Currency” Dated February 28, 2022


 


	To:	The First International Bank of Israel, Ltd.
	 	Office 274 – U-Bank
Hertzliya



 


		●	Account Name:  	On
Track Innovations Ltd.



 


		●	Loan Currency:  	U.S.
Dollars.



 


		●	Amount of the Loan: 	2,000,000.00



 


		●	Day of Grant of the Loan:  	Date
of credit of the loan amount in the account.



 


		●	Date of Repayment:  	March
28, 2022.



 


		●	Interest:  	Secured
Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR) plus 2.45%.



 


	 	●	Date of Payment of Interest: 	March
28, 2022
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 164 

Authorizing the use of the rotunda of the Capitol for a ceremony to award 

the Congressional Gold Medal to Dr. Norman E. Borlaug. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 5, 2007 

Mr. LATHAM submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on House Administration 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Authorizing the use of the rotunda of the Capitol for a 

ceremony to award the Congressional Gold Medal to 

Dr. Norman E. Borlaug. 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That the rotunda of the Capitol is authorized 

3 to be used on July 17, 2007, for a ceremony to award 

4 the Congressional Gold Medal to Dr. Norman E. Borlaug. 

5 Physical preparations for the ceremony shall be carried 

6 out in accordance with such conditions as the Architect 

7 of the Capitol may prescribe. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PRODPC60 with BILLS