alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2017129EN.01001601.xml

| 24.4.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 129/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.4.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 129/16

---

Judgment of the General Court of 14 March 2017 — Edison v EUIPO — Eolus Vind (e)

(Case T-276/15) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for an EU figurative mark - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2017/C 129/26)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Edison SpA (Milan, Italy) (represented by: D. Martucci, F. Boscariol de Roberto and I. Gatto, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Hanf and A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Eolus Vind AB (publ) (Hässleholm, Sweden)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 24 February 2015 (Case R 2358/2013-1), relating to opposition proceedings between Edison and Eolus Vind.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Edison SpA to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Edison SpA to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 236, 20.7.2015.

1

---
Exhibit 35.13  LOGO

CommercialMortgageServicing D1050-084, 8th Fl
401 South Tryon Street Charlotte, NC 28202
1-800-326-1334 ANNUAL
STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of October 1, 2015, by and
among WELLS FARGO COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES, INC., as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as General Master Servicer, LNR PARTNERS, LLC, as General Special Servicer, NATIONAL COOPERATIVE BANK, N.A., as NCB Master Servicer,
NATIONAL COOPERATIVE BANK, N.A., as NCB Special Servicer, MIDLAND LOAN SERVICES, A DIVISION OF PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as One Court Square Special Servicer, PENTALPHA SURVEILLANCE LLC, as Trust Advisor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL
ASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator, as Tax Administrator and as Custodian and WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2015-NXS3 (the Agreement).
Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement. Pursuant to Section 11.12 of this
Agreement, I, Leslie Hayton, Managing Director of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:  1.
A review of the activities of the General Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2018 through
December 31, 2018 (the Reporting Period), and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and  2.
To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the General Master Servicer, has fulfilled all of its
obligations under this Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the
undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2019.  LOGO Leslie Hayton Managing
Director Wells Fargo Bank Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.


LOGO
No. 45176.

#### Protests 42287-K, etc., of B. Filippone & Co., Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of *Locatelli*v. *United States*(T. D. 48284) it was held that an allowance of *2}i*percent should have been made in the weight of the cheese to compensate for the inedible coverings.
# C_2016335EN.01001901.xml

| 12.9.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 335/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.9.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 335/19

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 30 June 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Judecătoria Sibiu — Romania) — Direcția Generală Regională a Finanțelor Publice Brașov (DGRFP) v Vasile Toma, Biroul Executorului Judecătoresc Horațiu-Vasile Cruduleci

(Case C-205/15) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Article 47 - Right of access to a court - Principle of equality of arms - Principles of equivalence and effectiveness - Proceedings for the enforcement of a judicial decision ordering the repayment of a tax levied in breach of EU law - Exemption of public authorities from certain legal costs - Jurisdiction of the Court))

(2016/C 335/25)

Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Referring court

Judecătoria Sibiu

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Direcția Generală Regională a Finanțelor Publice Brașov (DGRFP)

Applicant:

Defendants: Vasile Toma, Biroul Executorului Judecătoresc Horațiu-Vasile Cruduleci

Defendants:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and the principles of equivalence and effectiveness must be interpreted as not precluding legislation such as that at issue in the main proceedings which exempts legal persons governed by public law from judicial stamping fees when they lodge an objection to the enforcement of a judicial decision relating to the repayment of taxes levied in breach of EU law and exempts those persons from the obligation to lodge a security at the time of bringing an application for a stay of such enforcement proceedings, while the applications submitted by legal and natural persons governed by private law in the context of such procedures remain, in principle, subject to court costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 245, 27.7.2015.

1

---
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 203 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 203

     Condemning the persecution of labor rights advocates in Iran.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 5, 2007

    Mr. Kirk (for himself and Mr. Andrews) submitted the following 
 concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
     Condemning the persecution of labor rights advocates in Iran.

Whereas, on April 9, 2007, Iranian agents arrested and imprisoned Mahmoud 
        Salehi, founder of the Saghez Bakery Workers Association;
Whereas Salehi's life is in grave danger as he sits in the Sanandaj prisons 
        without access to kidney dialysis treatment;
Whereas, on July 10, 2007, plainclothes Iranian agents severely beat and 
        arrested Mansour Osanloo, president of the Syndicate of Workers of 
        Tehran and Suburbs (Vahed);
Whereas Osanloo now sits in Iran's notorious Evin prison with a chronic heart 
        condition and a serious eye condition that requires immediate surgery;
Whereas Osanloo has no access to medical or legal assistance and no contact with 
        his family;
Whereas, on August 9, 2007, Teamsters General President James P. Hoffa called on 
        Iran to immediately release Osanloo and Salehi;
Whereas, on August 9, 2007, the International Trade Union Confederation, 
        together with the International Transport Workers' Federation, staged an 
        international day of action to free Osanloo and Salehi;
Whereas Iran is a member of the International Labor Organization (ILO) and is 
        legally bound to respect ILO core principles, including freedom of 
        association;
Whereas Freedom House reported in 2006 that ``Iranian law does not allow 
        independent labor unions to exist''; and
Whereas the United States remains the leading voice in the world for 
        international workers' rights and labor standards: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That Congress--
            (1) condemns the Government of Iran for the arrest and 
        imprisonment of Iranian union leaders Mahmoud Salehi and 
        Mansour Osanloo and demands their immediate release; and
            (2) expresses its solidarity with the workers of Iran and 
        stands with them in their effort to bring political freedom and 
        individual liberty to Iran.
                                 <all>
```
Order filed February 27, 2018

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 17

- 00922

- CR

____________ ANTHONY WAYNE SYKES , Appellant

V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 184th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1513135



### O R D E R

The clerk’s record was filed January 2, 2018. On January 9, 2018, this court abated the appeal for supplementation of the record.
The Harris County District Clerk is directed to file a supplemental clerk’s
record on or before March 9, 2018, containing certification of the right to appeal signed January 12, 2018.If the omitted item is not part of the case file, the district clerk is directed to

file a supplemental clerk’s record containing a certified statement that the omitted item is not a part of the case file.

PER CURIAM
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 618 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 618

       Designating November 26, 2006, as ``Drive Safer Sunday''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 16, 2006

  Mr. Chambliss (for himself and Mr. Isakson) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

       Designating November 26, 2006, as ``Drive Safer Sunday''.

Whereas motor vehicle travel is the primary means of transportation in the 
        United States;
Whereas everyone on the roads and highways needs to drive more safely to reduce 
        deaths and injuries resulting from motor vehicle accidents;
Whereas the death of almost 43,000 people a year in more than 6 million highway 
        crashes in the United States has been called an epidemic by 
        Transportation Secretary Norman Mineta;
Whereas according to the National Highway Transportation Safety Administration, 
        wearing a seat belt saved 15,434 lives in 2004 and 15,632 lives in 2005; 
        and
Whereas the Sunday after Thanksgiving is the busiest highway traffic day of the 
        year: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) encourages--
                    (A) high schools, colleges, universities, 
                administrators, teachers, primary schools, and 
                secondary schools to launch campus-wide educational 
                campaigns to urge students to be careful about safety 
                when driving;
                    (B) national trucking firms to alert their drivers 
                to be especially focused on driving safely during the 
                heaviest traffic day of the year, and to publicize the 
                importance of the day using Citizen's band (CB) radios 
                and in truck stops across the Nation;
                    (C) clergy to remind their members to travel safely 
                when attending services and gatherings;
                    (D) law enforcement personnel to remind drivers and 
                passengers to drive particularly safely on the Sunday 
                after Thanksgiving; and
                    (E) everyone to use the Sunday after Thanksgiving 
                as an opportunity to educate themselves about highway 
                safety; and
            (2) designates November 26, 2006, as ``Drive Safer 
        Sunday''.
                                 <all>
```
Skip to main content
ORNL DAAC HomeNASA Home
- Home 
- About Us    - Mission
  - Data Use and Citation Policy
  - User Working Group
  - Partners 
- Get Data    - Science Themes      - Vegetation and Forests
    - Arctic Ecosystems
    - Soils
    - Carbon Cycle
    - Biomass
    - Land Use and Human Dimensions
    - Hydrology and Cryosphere
    - Fire
    - Climate 
  - NASA Projects      - BigFoot
    - Hydroclimatology Collection
    - Large Scale Biosphere-Atmosphere Experiment (LBA-ECO)
    - Terrestrial Ecology Subsetting & Visualization Services (TESViS)
    - Net Primary Productivity (NPP)
    - Oregon Transect Ecosystem Research Project (OTTER)
    - Prototype Validation Exercise (PROVE)
    - Southern African Regional Science Initiative Project (SAFARI 2000)
    - Soil Collection
    - Boreal Ecosystem-Atmosphere Study (BOREAS)
    - Superior National Forest
    - Vegetation Collection
    - Vegetation-Ecosystem Modeling and Analysis Project (VEMAP)
    - Model Archive
    - North American Carbon Program (NACP)
    - International Satellite Land Surface Climatology Project (ISLSCP II)
    - Atmospheric Tracer Transport Model Intercomparison Project (TransCom)
    - Services
    - Daymet
    - Carbon Monitoring System (CMS)
    - Arctic-Boreal Vulnerability Experiment (ABoVE)
    - Carbon in Arctic Reservoirs Vulnerability Experiment (CARVE)
    - Airborne Microwave Observatory of Subcanopy and Subsurface (AirMOSS)
    - Atmospheric Carbon and Transport - America (ACT-America)
    - AfriSAR
    - Atmospheric Tomography Mission (ATom)
    - Accelerated Canopy Chemistry Program (ACCP)
    - Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI)
    - Delta-X
    - SIF-ESDR
    - MODIS/ASTER Airborne Simulator (MASTER)
    - CARbon Atmosphere Flux Experiment (CARAFE)
    - Active Sensing of CO2 Emissions over Nights, Days, and Seasons (ASCENDS) Airborne Campaign
    - CO2 and MEthane eXperiment (COMEX)
    - Airborne Visible InfraRed Imaging Spectrometer (AVIRIS)
    - SBG High Frequency Time Series (SHIFT)
    - Climate Collection
    - Space-based Imaging Spectroscopy and Thermal pathfindER (SISTER)
    - EOS Land Validation
    - First ISLSCP Field Experiment (FIFE)
    - FLUXNET 
  - All Datasets 
- Submit Data    - Submit Data Form
  - Data Scope and Acceptance
  - Data Authorship Policy
  - Data Publication Timeline
  - Detailed Submission Guidelines 
- Tools    - TESViS      - TESViS Fixed Site Subsets
    - TESViS Global Subsets
    - TESViS Web service
  - THREDDS
  - SDAT
  - Daymet
  - Airborne Data Visualizer
  - Soil Moisture Visualizer 
- Resources    - Learning
  - Data Management
  - News 
- Help    - Earthdata Forum
  - Email Us 

Sign in

        - Data
        - Website
        - Mercury

Earthdata Search

----

Advanced Data Search

----

DAAC Home

# Get Data

            -  Science Themes 
            -  NASA Projects 
            -  All Datasets
**Certification of the Chief Executive OfficerPursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)**

              I, Glenn F. Tilton, the Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officerof United Air Lines, Inc. (the "Company") certify that to the best of myknowledge, based upon a review of the quarterly report on Form 10-Q forthe period ended March 31, 2005 of the Company (the "Report"):(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofthe Company. /s/ Glenn F. Tilton__________Glenn F. TiltonUnited Air Lines, Inc.Chairman, President and Chief Executive OfficerMay 20, 2005
#### Lowe *versus*Dore *& al.*

In suit upon a poor debtor’s bond, the decision of the justices of the quorum is conclusive as to the correctness of the notice to the plaintiff of the time, place and intent to take the poor debtor’s oath.

Debt upon a poor debtor’s bond. The trial was Tenney, J. The defence was that the debtor had taken statute oath. That defence was resisted on the ground, that the plaintiff had not been duly notified. He offered evidence to prove that fact. The evidence would show that the notice was served on the plaintiff’s attorney; that though the plaintiff at the commencement of his action, resided in Massachusetts, yet prior to the issuing of the notice, he had removed into this State, and that the place of his residence in this State was known to the debtor. Several documents were referred to, none of which came into the Reporter’s hands. The case was presented for decision upon so much of the evidence as was admissible.

*Hutchinson,*for plaintiff.

The proceedings were illegal and void. The creditor was alive and within the State. The citation was served upon the plaintiff’s attorney.

The service of the citation must be upon the creditor, if alive and within the State. R. S. c. 148, <§> 23.

The fact that the creditor was alive and within the State, may be proved by parol. It could be proved in no other way. *Williams*v. *Burrill,*23 Maine, 144.

The acts of the justices where they have no jurisdiction, may be avoided by plea or evidence. *Haskell*v. *Hazen al.*3 Pick. 404.

The original citation, with the officer’s return theréon, is the foundation of the proceedings of the justices, is part of the record with them remaining, and admissible in evidence. *Slasson*v. *Brown,*20 Pick. 436, and cases there cited.

The certificate is not conclusive evidence, where it appears that the justices had not jurisdiction. *Granite Bank*v. Treat, 18 Maine, 340.

*28It must appear that the justices were selected according to law. In this case it does not so appear. R. S. c. 148, § 46.

The justices have no . power to legalize the service of the notice upon strangers, nor to take jurisdiction without service upon him, whom the law requires to be notified.

Abbott, for defendant.

Shepley, C. J.,

orally.—By statute, chap. 148, sec. 25, and the decisions under it, the justices are required to adjudicate upon the correctness of the notice.

If they adjudge it correct, they are to proceed further; otherwise, their action is at an end.

After the plaintiff had removed into this State, and his residence had been made known to the defendants, the notice was served, not upon the plaintiff, but upon his attorney. Was that a correct notice? That very question was before the justices for their decision. They considered the notice correct. That decision is conclusive. It is not examinable here. This has often been ruled. *Plaintiff nonsuit.*
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DARRYL YOUNG, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 v. 

ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of 

Social Security, 

Defendant-Appellee.

No. 16-17019 

D.C. No. 2:15-cv-00663-CMK 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Craig Kellison, Magistrate Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 17, 2019**

Before: TROTT, SILVERMAN, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.

Darryl Young (Mr. Young) appeals the district court’s affirmance of the 

Commissioner of Social Security’s denial of his application for disability insurance 

benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act. We have jurisdiction under 28 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

SEP 19 2019

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 16-17019 

U.S.C. § 1291 and 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). We review de novo, Attmore v. Colvin, 827 

F.3d 872, 875 (9th Cir. 2016), and we affirm. The administrative law judge’s 

(ALJ’s) allegedly insufficient development of the record is the only issue now 

raised on appeal.

The ALJ discharged his “duty to fully and fairly develop the record.” 

Tonapetyan v. Halter, 242 F.3d 1144, 1150 (9th Cir. 2001). The duty to develop 

the record is triggered when the evidence is ambiguous or the ALJ finds the record 

“inadequate to allow for proper evaluation of the evidence.” Id. “The ALJ may 

discharge this duty in several ways, including: subpoenaing the claimant’s 

physicians, submitting questions to the claimant’s physicians, continuing the 

hearing, or keeping the record open after the hearing to allow supplementation of 

the record.” Id. When the ALJ here determined he needed more evidence to 

consider the credibility of Mr. Young’s symptom testimony, he instructed Mr. 

Young to consult with a cardiologist to determine why Mr. Young was taking 

multiple diuretics, whether Mr. Young’s reported frequency of urination was a 

common effect of the medication, and if anything could be done to reduce the 

frequency. The ALJ further provided the cardiologist’s report to Mr. Young’s 

counsel, invited him to question the cardiologist, and left the record open for Mr. 

Young to provide additional evidence. The district court correctly found no error.

AFFIRMED.
# C_2016392EN.01003801.xml

| 24.10.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 392/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.10.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 392/38

---

Judgment of the General Court of 13 September 2016 — Globo Comunicação e Participações v EUIPO (sound mark)

(Case T-408/15) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Application for a sound mark - Absolute ground for refusal - No distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Obligation to state reasons - Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009))

(2016/C 392/48)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Globo Comunicação e Participações S/A (Rio de Janeiro, Brazil) (represented by: E. Gaspar and M.-E. De Moro-Giafferri, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 18 March 2015 (Case R 2945/2014-5), concerning an application for registration of a sound mark as an EU trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Globo Comunicação e Participações S/A to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Globo Comunicação e Participações S/A to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 320, 28.9.2015.

1

---