alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND INCOME STATEMENT OF UGI UTILITIES, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES AS OF AND FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31,2000
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
IN UGI UTILITIES, INC.'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 2000
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000100548
<NAME> UGI UTILITIES,INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-2000
<CASH>                                          10,351
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  110,575
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,142
<INVENTORY>                                     28,379
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               167,027
<PP&E>                                         841,701
<DEPRECIATION>                                 271,811
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 822,120
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          250,920
<BONDS>                                        177,929
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           20,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        60,259
<OTHER-SE>                                     175,058
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   822,120
<SALES>                                        166,503
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               166,503
<CGS>                                          103,348
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  103,348
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,359
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,105
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 28,358
<INCOME-TAX>                                    11,263
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             17,095
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    17,095
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0<F1>
<FN>
<F1>(A) THERE ARE NO PUBLICLY HELD SHARES OUTSTANDING
</FN>


</TABLE>
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he H on orabl e G . M urray S no w , D i stri ctJudg e f or the U . S . D i stri ct ** C ourtf orA r i z ona , P hoe ni x, s i tt i ng byde s i gna t i on.

NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T RO BI N PO TERA - H A SK I N S, P la in tif

f - A p p e lla n t, v. GEOFFR EY GA M BL E; ALLE N YA RNE L L ; P E T E R F I E L DS ; DA N DA VI E S ; B OZ E MAN, MS U, D efen d an t s - A p p el l ees. N o. 10- 35778 D. C. No . 2 : 0 5 - c v - 0 0 0 2 2 - SE H ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f orthe D i s tr i c tof

M ont a na S a m E . H a ddon, D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng A r gue d a nd S ubm i tt e d A ugus t5, 2011

S e a tt l e , W a s hi ngt on B ef ore: S C H R O E D E R and N O O N A N , C i rc ui tJudg es , and S N O W , D i stri ct Judg e. ** R ob i n P ot er a- H as ki ns (“ P ot er a- H as ki ns”) appeal s the di stri ctcourt ’ s deni al of aj urytr i a l on he rc l a i m unde rT i t l e I X of the E duc a t i on A m e ndm e nt s of 1972, 

# FI LED AU G 16 2011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS2

20 U . S . C . § 1681, a nd i t s gr a ntof s um m a ryj udgm e nton he r42 U . S . C . § 1983 F i r s tA m e ndm e ntr e t a l i a t i on c l a i m . W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on unde r28 U . S . C . § 1291 a n dw e a f

f irm . P o te r a - H a s k in s w a s n o t e n title dto aju rytr ia l o n h e rT itle I X c la im . W ith re spec tt o m on et ary r el i ef , she c ou l d rec ov erno m ore than the l i qu i dat ed dam ages s h e r e c e iv e d , a n d ab e n c h tr ia l w a s th e r e f o r e ap p r o p r ia te . Se e Sm i th v . B ar ton , 914 F .2 d1 3 3 0 , 1 3 3 7 ( 9 th C ir . 1 9 9 0 ) . T h e d i stri ctco u rtp ro p erl y g ran t ed su m m ary j u d g m en to n P o t era-H ask i n s’ F ir s t A m e n d m e n t r e ta lia tio n c la im b e c au s e h e rs ta te m e n ts w e r e m a d e p u r s u a n t to h e ro f f ic ia l d u tie s . Se e G ar c e t t iv . C e bal los , 5 4 7 U .S . 4 1 0 , 4 2 1 ( 2 0 0 6 ) . AF F I RME D.
No. 53201.

#### J. E. Bernard *&*Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 68830-K/90564, etc. (Chicago).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
# C_2016343EN.01001502.xml

| 19.9.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 343/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.9.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 343/15

---

Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 12 July 2016 — Ana Pérez Gutiérrez v European Commission

(Case C-604/15 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Article 181 - Non-contractual liability of the European Union - Public health - Photographs proposed by the European Commission for the health warnings to be shown on packaging for tobacco products - Unauthorised use of the image of a deceased person))

(2016/C 343/23)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Ana Pérez Gutiérrez (represented by: J. Soler Puebla, abogado)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: J. Baquero Cruz and J. Tomkin, Agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

| 2. | Mrs Ana Pérez Gutiérrez shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Mrs Ana Pérez Gutiérrez shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 38, 1.2.2016.

1

---
# C_2016145EN.01003701.xml

| 25.4.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 145/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.4.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 145/37

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 10 March 2016 — Kozak v Commission

(Case F-152/15)

((Civil service - Open Competition EPSO/AD/293/14 - Decision of the selection board not to admit a candidate to sit tests at the assessment centre - Request for review - New decision of the selection board confirming its initial decision - Communication by EPSO of a reasoned reply - Purely confirmatory act - Time-limit for bringing proceedings - Manifest inadmissibility - Article 81 of the Rules of Procedure))

(2016/C 145/44)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Małgorzata Kozak (Warsaw, Poland) (represented by: J. Łojkowska-Paprocka, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of the decision of EPSO not to admit the applicant to the assessment stage of Competition EPSO/AD/293/14.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.

| 2. | Ms Kozak is to bear her own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Ms Kozak is to bear her own costs.

---
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
Youhave reached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection(FDLP/EC) Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in theFDLP/EC. Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suiteof cataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications (CGP).
**Title:****Outreach update [electronic resource]
 
SuDoc Number:A 57.81/9-2:
Item Number:0120-C-09 (online)
CGP System Number:000615114
 
2004: March | Fall
2005: One | Two
2006: One | Two
2007: One | Two
2008: One | Two
 
 
October 4, 2017
 
 **
No. 62071.

#### Georg Jensen, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 58/3030 (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of laminated chairs similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Davies Turner & Co.*v. *United States*(45 C. C. P. A. 39, C. A. D. 669), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Document

FIRST NOTE MODIFICATION AGREEMENT


THIS FIRST NOTE MODIFICATION AGREEMENT dated as of April 7, 2022 (“this Agreement”), is entered into by HIBBETT, INC., a Delaware corporation (the “Borrower”), and REGIONS BANK, an Alabama banking corporation (the “Lender”). 


 Recitals


A.        The Borrower has executed a certain Revolving Note in favor of the Lender dated July 9, 2021 (the “Note”).


B.         The Borrower has requested the Lender to consent to modifications of the Note as provided below.


C.         The Lender has agreed to such modifications of the Note, provided the Borrower executes this Agreement.


 Agreement


NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing recitals and of the mutual agreement of the parties hereto, the parties hereto hereby agree as follows:


1.All references in the Note to “One Hundred Million and No/100 Dollars” and “$100,000,000” as the maximum amount of principal that may be advanced by the Lender to the Borrower under the terms of the Note are hereby deleted and replaced with “One Hundred Twenty-Five Million and No/100 Dollars” and “$125,000,000” respectively.


2.Notwithstanding the execution of this Agreement, the Note shall remain in full force and effect, as modified hereby; and nothing herein contained and nothing done pursuant hereto shall be construed to release, satisfy, discharge, terminate or otherwise affect or impair in any manner whatsoever (a) the validity or enforceability of the indebtedness evidenced by the Note, except as expressly modified hereby; (b) the lien, security interest, security title, assignment or conveyance of any collateral securing the Note, or the priority thereof; (c) the liability of any maker, endorser, surety, guarantor or any party or parties whatsoever who may now or hereafter be liable under or on account of the Note; or (d) any other security or instrument held by the Lender now or hereafter as security for or evidence of the above-described indebtedness or any thereof.


3.This Agreement shall be binding upon the successors and assigns of the parties hereto.


4. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Alabama.


5.This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which so executed shall be deemed an original, but all such counterparts shall together constitute but one and the same agreement.
 












IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Lender and the Borrower have executed this Agreement all as of the day and year first above written.




															
			HIBBETT, INC.
					
			By:		/s/ Robert J. Volke
			Name:		Robert J. Volke
			Its:		Senior Vice President and
					Chief Financial Officer
					
					
			REGIONS BANK
			By:		/s/ Murray Statham
			Name:		Murray Statham
			Its:		Vice President
No. 53767.

protests 116147-K, etc. (Cleveland).

#### National Distillers Products Corp. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

For the reasons stated in *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C. D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

In the Matter of : No. 48 DB 2022 (No. 21 RST 2022)

:

BRIAN L. WATSON : Attorney Registration No. 84197

:

PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT :

 FROM INACTIVE STATUS : (Montgomery County)

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 19th day of May, 2022, the Report and Recommendation of 

Disciplinary Board Member dated May 10, 2022, is approved and it is ORDERED that

BRIAN L. WATSON, who has been on Inactive Status, has demonstrated that he has the 

moral qualifications, competency and learning in law required for admission to practice in 

the Commonwealth, shall be and is, hereby reinstated to active status as a member of 

the Bar of this Commonwealth. The expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation

and processing of this matter shall be paid by the Petitioner.
No. 45161.

#### Protests 39774-K, etc., of A. Geraldi et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of *Locatelli*v. *United States*(T. D. 49302 and T. D. 49389) it was held that an allowance of 2)4 percent on some items and 1 percent on others should have been made in the weight of - the cheese to compensate for the inedible coverings.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

PUBLIC MEETING ON ENERGY CONSERVATION PROGRAM FOR

CONSUMER PRODUCTS: TEST PROCEDURES FOR RESIDENTIAL WATER

HEATER, DIRECT HEATING EQUIPMENT, AND POOL HEATERS

U.S. Department of Energy

1000 Independence Avenue, SW.

Washington, DC 20585

Friday

, September 24 , 20 10

9 a.m. – 12:00 noon. ET, Room 8E-089

Purpose

During this meeting the Department of Energy (DOE) will present proposed amendments to

test procedures for residential water heaters, direct heating equipment, and pool heaters to

include standby mode and off mode. This meeting is intended to familiarize interested

stakeholders with DOE’s statutory requirements and proposed test procedures.

Agenda

9:00 - 9:05 am Welcome

U.S. Department of Energy

9:05 - 9:15 am Opening Remarks, Introduction and Agenda Review

Doug Brookman

9:15 - 9:25 am Rulemaking Overview (slide 5)

Mohammed Khan

This is an overview of the purposes of the public meeting and the

statutory authority and requirements DOE has for addre ssing the

EISA 2007 requirements.

9:25 - 10:00 am Brief Opening Remarks from Interested Parties (as applicable)

(slide6)

Doug Brookman

Interested parties are invited to make brief summary comments

regarding the NOPR content proposed test procedures.

10:00 – 10:15 am Rulemaking Steps, Rulemaking History, and Discussion of

Proposed Amendments (slides 7 -10)

Mohammed Khan

Summary presentation of rulemaking steps, history, and discussion

regarding the approach used and factors considered for the

determination of scope and test procedure revisions.

10:15 – 11:30 am Detailed Discussion of Proposed Amendments (slides 11 - 21)

John Talbott

Summary of proposed amendments and technical details of the key

assump tions and positions taken. For each product, a discussion and

explanation of the proposed amendments will be followed byopportunity for comment from participants. Presentation will proceed

as follows: water heaters, vented heaters, unvented heaters, and pool

heaters.

11:30 – 11:45 pm Final Comments from Interested Parties

11:45 -12:00 noon Next Steps and Closing (slide 2 2)

Mohammed Khan

12:00 noon Adjourn
# C_2016462EN.01000601.xml

| 12.12.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 462/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.12.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 462/6

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 13 October 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof — Germany) — Servoprax GmbH v Roche Diagnostics Deutschland GmbH

(Case C-277/15) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Approximation of laws - In vitro diagnostic medical devices - Directive 98/79/EC - Parallel imports - Translation by the importer of the information and instructions for use provided by the manufacturer - Supplementary conformity assessment procedure))

(2016/C 462/08)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Bundesgerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Servoprax GmbH

Applicant:

Defendant: Roche Diagnostics Deutschland GmbH

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 9 of Directive 98/79/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 October 1998 on in vitro diagnostic medical devices must be interpreted as meaning that it does not require a parallel importer of a device for self-diagnosis for measuring blood sugar that bears a CE marking and that was the subject of a conformity assessment by a notified body to undertake a further assessment in order to certify the conformity of the labelling of that device and the instructions for its use as a result of their translation into the official language of the Member State of importation.

---

(1)  OJ C 294, 7.9.2015.

1

---
(Reap. Dec. 8379)

Entry No. 716844.

#### J. J. Gavin & Co., Inc., a/c Florida Sponge & Chamois Co. et al. *v.*United States

(Decided January 5, 1955)

*Siegel, Mandell & Davidson*for the plaintiffs.

*Warren E. Burger,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Mollison, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule *“A,”*attached hereto and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, subject to the approval of the Court, that the issues in the appeals to reappraisement listed above are the same in all material respects as the issues in the case of *United States*v. *Schroeder & Tremayne, Inc., et al.,*Suit 4783 and that the.record in said case may be incorporated herein.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED, that the entered values of the merchandise involved in the cases listed herein are equal to the price at the time of exportation of such merchandise to the United States, at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the Country from which exported in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, and that the foreign value of such or similar merchandise was no higher.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED .that these cases may be deemed submitted on the foregoing stipulation.

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values were the entered values.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  7
<RESTATED>
<CIK>  0000101115
<NAME> UNITED COMPANIES LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000
<CURRENCY>  U.S.  DOLLARS
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       9-MOS 
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                  SEP-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                         1 
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>            1,063,076 
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>              50,904 
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                51,867 
<EQUITIES>                          1,032 
<MORTGAGE>                        225,584 
<REAL-ESTATE>                          40 
<TOTAL-INVEST>                  1,473,787 
<CASH>                                  0 
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                 34,748 
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>              2,194 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  1,654,984 
<POLICY-LOSSES>                 1,456,675 
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                   360 
<POLICY-OTHER>                          0 
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                   0 
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                         0 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0 
<PREFERRED>                             0 
<COMMON>                            8,401 
<OTHER-SE>                        165,231 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    1,654,984 
<PREMIUMS>                          4,766 
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                89,139 
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                 (1,225)
<OTHER-INCOME>                      1,906 
<BENEFITS>                          7,101 
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>        11,913 
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>               69,296 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     6,276 
<INCOME-TAX>                        2,295 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 3,981 
<DISCONTINUED>                          0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0 
<CHANGES>                               0 
<NET-INCOME>                        3,981 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                        0.95 
<EPS-DILUTED>                        0.95 
<RESERVE-OPEN>                          0 
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                     0 
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                       0 
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                      0 
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                        0 
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                         0 
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                 0 
        


</TABLE>
Form Approved: 

– OMB number : 1810-0657 

– Expiration date: 

U.S. Department of Education

Impact Aid Program

Washington, D.C. 20202-6244 

Certification of Work Completion

Grantee: 

Project: 

Address: 

 

Work Project Description (as completed): 

 

This work project has been reviewed and found, to the Facilities Manager or Architect’s best knowledge, 

information and belief, to be designed and completed in conformance with applicable Federal, State, and 

local laws, orders, regulations, standards, codes and ordinances. 

 

Date School District Facilities Manager or Architect
Form Approved: 

– OMB number : 1810-0657 

– Expiration date: 

U.S. Department of Education

Impact Aid Program 

Washington, D.C. 20202-6244 

 

Request For Final Payment, Assurances, and Certification 

Grantee: 

 

Project: 

Address: 

o This project has been completed in a manner satisfactory to the GRANTEE. 

o The GRANTEE also acknowledges that the accounts of the project have not been audited by the U.S. 

Department of Education but ASSURES the Secretary of Education that it or its successors will refund to the 

Department of Education such amounts, subject to an audit appeal by the GRANTEE, as may be determined 

pursuant to a subsequent audit to be due the Federal Government. 

o The GRANTEE FURTHER ASSURES THE SECRETARY that any underpayment of wages, refunds or 

rebates to the GRANTEE, or other revenue or monetary adjustments in its favor, will be reported to the Secretary of 

Education, and the amount of such underpayment of wages and penalties resulting there from, and the Federal share 

of any such refunds, rebates, revenue, or adjustments not considered in determining the amount of this payment for 

the project will be refunded to the Department of Education. 

$ Total 8007(b) Funds expended 

$ Total local funds expended 

$ Total Cost of the Project (Attach supporting documents) 

$ Final draw down request 

Certification 

1. Interest earned to date and credited to this project. $ _________________ 

2. Interest expected to be earned and/or credited to this project. $ _________________ 

3. Other. $ _________________ 

I certify that to the best of my knowledge and belief the data above are correct and that all outlays were made in 

accordance with the grant conditions or other agreement and that the final grant payment is due. 

______________ _____________________________________________ 

Date Authorized LEA Representative