alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2017144EN.01001001.xml

| 8.5.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 144/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.5.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 144/10

---

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 9 March 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the cour d’appel de Liège — Belgium) — État belge v Oxycure Belgium SA

(Case C-573/15) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Value added tax - Directive 2006/112/EC - Article 98(2) - Annex III, points 3 and 4 - Principle of fiscal neutrality - Medical treatment using oxygen - Reduced VAT rate - Oxygen cylinders - Standard rate of VAT - Oxygen concentrators))

(2017/C 144/12)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Referring court

Cour d’appel de Liège

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: État belge

Applicant:

Defendant: Oxycure Belgium SA

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 98(1) and (2) of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax and Annex III, points 3 and 4, thereto, read in the light of the principle of fiscal neutrality, does not preclude national legislation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which provides that the standard rate of value added tax is applicable to the supply or rental of oxygen concentrators, while that legislation provides for the application of the reduced value added tax rate on the supply of oxygen cylinders

---

(1)  OJ C 38, 1.2.2016.

1

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-7128

ROGER OSBORN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

JOSEPH P. SACCHET, Warden; MARYLAND STATE

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; MARYLAND STATE

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONAL

SERVICES; INCORPORATED CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL

SERVICES; LLOYD WATERS, Warden; ANTHONY SWETZ,

Health Services, DPSCS; JOHN D. STAFFORD,

Doctor, Medical Director, CMS; ALAN GRAVES,

Doctor, DDS; HARRY HEISE, Doctor, DDS; DOCTOR

MOUBAREK, Physician, CMS; ELEANOR BOWLES, Ms.,

Regional Health Care Administrator; ROBERT H.

MILLER, Mr., Case Management Supervisor,

Retired; OLIN BRAKE, Mr., Case Management

Supervisor, MCI-H,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

ROBERT TESTONI, Doctor, DDS,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Marvin J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-00-

1952-MJG)

Submitted: October 4, 2001 Decided: October 12, 2001
2

Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Roger Osborn, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney

General, Glenn William Bell, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF

MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland; Philip Melton Andrews, Michael

Joseph Lentz, KRAMON & GRAHAM, Baltimore, Maryland; Robert Fulton

Dashiell, WARTZMAN, OMANSKY, BILBAUM, SIMONS, STEINBERG, SACHS &

SAGAL, Towson, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Roger Osborn appeals the district court’s order denying relief

on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint. We have

reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. See Osborn v. Sacchet, No. CA-00-1952-MJG (D. Md.

June 15, 2001). We deny Osborn’s motion titled “Request for Time

Extension.” We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>   1
                       UGI UTILITIES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
        COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES - EXHIBIT 12.1
                             (THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS)



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                 Six                                          Nine        
                                               Months                                         Months         Year   
                                                Ended         Year Ended September 30,        Ended         Ended    
                                              March 31,   -------------------------------  September 30, December 31,
                                                1997       1996         1995       1994        1993         1992
                                              -------     -------     -------     -------     -------     -------
<S>                                           <C>         <C>         <C>         <C>         <C>         <C>    
EARNINGS:
Earnings before income taxes                  $62,809     $61,717     $39,759     $41,244     $28,009     $43,054
Interest expense                                8,471      15,921      16,632      16,482      12,664      21,913
Amortization of debt discount and expense          85         173         206         187         147         250
Interest component of rental expense            1,023       1,838       1,604       1,344         953       1,256
                                              -------     -------     -------     -------     -------     -------
                                              $72,388     $79,649     $58,201     $59,257     $41,773     $66,473
                                              =======     =======     =======     =======     =======     =======


FIXED CHARGES:
Interest expense                              $ 8,471     $15,921     $16,632     $16,482     $12,664     $21,913
Amortization of debt discount and expense          85         173         206         187         147         250
Allowance for funds used during
      construction (capitalized interest)          40         107          65         136          87          57
Interest component of rental expense            1,023       1,838       1,604       1,344         953       1,256
                                              -------     -------     -------     -------     -------     -------
                                              $ 9,619     $18,039     $18,507     $18,149     $13,851     $23,476
                                              =======     =======     =======     =======     =======     =======

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges               7.53        4.42        3.14        3.27        3.02        2.83
                                              =======     =======     =======     =======     =======     =======
</TABLE>
# C_2015311EN.01002102.xml

| 21.9.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 311/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.9.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 311/21

---

Action brought on 23 June 2015 — European Commission v Romania

(Case C-306/15)

(2015/C 311/26)

Language of the case: Romanian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: E. Sanfrutos Cano, L.Nicolae, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Romania

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the court should:

| — | declare that, by failing to adopt all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with the provisions of Commission Directive 2013/2/EU of 7 February 2013 amending Annex 1 to Directive 94/62/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on packaging and packaging waste (1) or, in any event, by failing to communicate the same to the Commission, Romania has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 2(1) of that directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by failing to adopt all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with the provisions of Commission Directive 2013/2/EU of 7 February 2013 amending Annex 1 to Directive 94/62/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on packaging and packaging waste (1) or, in any event, by failing to communicate the same to the Commission, Romania has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 2(1) of that directive;

1

| — | order Romania to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order Romania to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The time-limit for transposition of the directive into national law expired on 30 September 2013.

---

(1)  OJ 2013 L 37, p. 10.

1

---
(Reap. Dec. 9370)

#### Martin Fabrics Corp., International Expediters, Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 742366.

*585(Decided March 30, 1959)

*Tompkins & Tompkins*for the plaintiffs.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Ford, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between counsel for the Plaintiff and the Assistant Attorney General for the United States, Defendant, that the items marked *“A”*and cheeked with the initials NK by Examiner N. Klotz on the invoice covered by the above-named reappraisement appeal consist of velvets in chief value of silk exported to the United States from France.

> That at the time of exportation velvets such as or similar to those marked A, as aforesaid, were being freely offered for sale for home consumption to all purchasers in the principal markets of France, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, at 4000 french francs per meter, less 2%, packing included, which price was the same, as or higher than, the “export value” as defined in Section 402(d), Tariff Act of 1930.

> The above named reappraisement appeal is submitted for decision upon this stipulation.

Accepting this stipulation as a statement of fact, I find and bold tbe export value, as that value is defined in section 402(d) of tbe Tariff Act of 1930, to be tbe proper basis of value of tbe merchandise marked “A” and checked NK on tbe invoice, and that such statutory value is 4,000 French francs per meter, less 2 per centum, packing included.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

 

CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906

OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

 

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q ofUnico American Corporation (the "Company") for the period ended March 31, 2011, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Cary L. Cheldin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that to the best of my knowledge:

 

1.      the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

 

/s/ Cary L. Cheldin

 

Name:   Cary L. Cheldin

Title:      Chairman of the Board, Presidentand Chief Executive Officer

Date:     May 13, 2011

 

 

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906,or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronicversion of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Unico American Corporation, and

will be retained by Unico American Corporation, and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
### P a l m da l e H y b r i d P o w e r P r o j e c t PS D P e rm i t

N u m be r SE 09

- 01

Debo r ah J o r dan t o: r ob

, A p r il S o mm er 09 / 12 / 2011 02 : 00 PM

C c: J u li e W a l t

e r s

, G e r a r do R i o s

, L i s a B e ck ham

Dea r Mr

. S i m p s on,

T han k y ou f

o r y ou r i n t

e r e s t i n EPA's p r

opo s ed PS D pe rm i t f

o r t he P a l m da l e H y b r i d P owe r Pr o j e c t. EPA

ha s r e v i ewed and c on s i de r

ed y ou r r eque s t f o r an e x t en s i on o f t

he c o mm en t pe r i od f

o r t h i s a c t i on

. I

de c li ne t o g r an t y ou r r

eque s t. T he r

e f o r e

, t he pub li c c o mm en t pe r i od w ill c l o s e a s sc hedu l ed on

S ep t e m be r 14

, 2011

. P l ea s e no t e t ha t c o mm en t

s s ub m i tt

ed b y e m a il m u s t be s ub m i tt ed no l a t e r t han

11 : 59 p m P a c i f

i c da y li gh t t

i m e on S ep t

e m be r 14

, 2011.

W e l oo k f

o r wa r d t o r e c e i v i ng and r

e v i ew i ng y ou r c o mm en t

s on EPA's p r

opo s ed a c t

i on

.

S i n c e r e l y,

Debo r ah J o r dan

_________________

Debo r ah J o r dan

D i r e c t o r

, A i r D i v i s i on

U

. S

. EPA Reg i on 9

phone : ( 415

) 972

- 3133

f a x : ( 415 ) 947

- 3581
Case: 2:12-cv-00894-MHW-TPK Doc #: 12 Filed: 03/04/13 Page: 1 of 6  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00894-MHW-TPK Doc #: 12 Filed: 03/04/13 Page: 2 of 6  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00894-MHW-TPK Doc #: 12 Filed: 03/04/13 Page: 3 of 6  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00894-MHW-TPK Doc #: 12 Filed: 03/04/13 Page: 4 of 6  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00894-MHW-TPK Doc #: 12 Filed: 03/04/13 Page: 5 of 6  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00894-MHW-TPK Doc #: 12 Filed: 03/04/13 Page: 6 of 6  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-11T10:02:00-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE BODY OF THE ACCOMPANYING FORM 10Q AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          30,281
<SECURITIES>                                     5,471
<RECEIVABLES>                                   36,687
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     23,281
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               113,135
<PP&E>                                         107,959
<DEPRECIATION>                                  80,289
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 181,799
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           40,301
<BONDS>                                          4,235
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        14,374
<OTHER-SE>                                      90,359
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   181,799
<SALES>                                         97,167
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                98,925
<CGS>                                           71,231
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   91,190
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 119
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,616
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,995
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,621
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,621
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .38
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .36
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000101357
<NAME> UNITED MERCHANTS AND MANUFACTURERS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                            1230
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     9511
<ALLOWANCES>                                      2863
<INVENTORY>                                      17678
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 27588
<PP&E>                                           10250
<DEPRECIATION>                                    7487
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   55218
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            16415
<BONDS>                                          79921
<COMMON>                                         17845
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        450
<OTHER-SE>                                     (66967)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     55218
<SALES>                                          25327
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 25327
<CGS>                                            13154
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    13154
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   360
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                3510
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  12412
<INCOME-TAX>                                        50
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              12362
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     12362
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.57
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.57
        

</TABLE>
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 21-3656

___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee

v.

Mohamed Salah Hussein, also known as Cheese

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant

 ____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the District of Minnesota

 ____________

 Submitted: April 5, 2022

Filed: April 11, 2022

[Unpublished]

____________

Before GRUENDER, ERICKSON, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.

Mohamed Hussein appeals the sentence imposed by the district court1 after he

pleaded guilty to a drug offense, pursuant to a plea agreement containing an appeal

1The Honorable Ann D. Montgomery, United States District Judge for the

District of Minnesota.
waiver. His counsel has moved for leave to withdraw, and has filed a brief under

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), challenging the sentence.

Upon careful review, we conclude that the appeal waiver is valid, enforceable,

and applicable to the issue raised in this appeal. See United States v. Scott, 627 F.3d

702, 704 (8th Cir. 2010) (validity and applicability of an appeal waiver is reviewed

de novo); United States v. Andis, 333 F.3d 886, 889-92 (8th Cir. 2003) (en banc)

(appeal waiver will be enforced if the appeal falls within the scope of the waiver, the

defendant knowingly and voluntarily entered into the plea agreement and the waiver,

and enforcing the waiver would not result in a miscarriage of justice). We have also

independently reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988), and

have found no non-frivolous issues for appeal falling outside the scope of the waiver. 

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal based on the appeal waiver, and we grant

counsel’s motion to withdraw.

______________________________

-2-
Exhibit 10.3
 Service Agreement No. 80935Control No.




---



##### 



Service Agreement No. 80935
Control No.
       UGI CENTRAL PENN GAS, INC.
    
    
    
    COLUMBIA GAS TRANSMISSION, LLCBy
    
    
    
    
    
    ByTitle
    
    
    
    
    
    Title




---



##### 



Maximum Daily StorageBegin Date
    
    End Date
    
    
    Storage Contract Quantity Dth
    
    
    Quantity Dth/DayApril 1, 2005
    
    March 31, 2009
    
    
    706,443
    
    
    
    10,715April 1, 2009
    
    March 31, 2014
    
    
    762,243
    
    
    
    11,324
  o þ
 o þ
  o þ
 o þ
  UGI Central Penn Gas, Inc.
    
    
    
    Columbia Gas Transmission, LLCBy:
    
    
    
    
    
    By:Its:
    
    
    
    
    
    Its:Date:
    
    
    
    
    
    Date:
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 179 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.Con.Res.179
                                                 Agreed to June 28, 2007

                       One Hundred Tenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday,
            the fourth day of January, two thousand and seven

                          Concurrent Resolution

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),  
That when the House adjourns on the legislative day of Thursday, June 
28, 2007, or Friday, June 29, 2007, on a motion offered pursuant to 
this concurrent resolution by its Majority Leader or his designee, it 
stand adjourned until 2 p.m. on Tuesday, July 10, 2007, or until the 
time of any reassembly pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent 
resolution, whichever occurs first; and that when the Senate recesses 
or adjourns on Friday, June 29, 2007, Saturday, June 30, 2007, Sunday, 
July 1, 2007, or Monday, July 2, 2007, on a motion offered pursuant to 
this concurrent resolution by its Majority Leader or his designee, it 
stand recessed or adjourned until noon on Monday, July 9, 2007, or such 
other time on that day as may be specified by its Majority Leader or 
his designee in the motion to recess or adjourn, or until the time of 
any reassembly pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution, 
whichever occurs first.
    Sec. 2.  The Speaker of the House and the Majority Leader of the 
Senate, or their respective designees, acting jointly after 
consultation with the Minority Leader of the House and the Minority 
Leader of the Senate, shall notify the Members of the House and the 
Senate, respectively, to reassemble at such place and time as they may 
designate if, in their opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.
Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.
```
Order entered February 12, 2021

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-20-01084-CV

ALFREDO SANCHEZ AND FERMIN LOPEZ, Appellants

V.

LUIS TORRES, Appellee

On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-19-03653

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case has not been filed. By letter dated January 

21, 2021, we informed appellants the court reporter notified us that the reporter’s 

record had not been filed because appellants had not (1) requested the record; or 

(2) paid for or made arrangements to pay for the record. We directed appellants to 

provide the Court with written verification showing the reporter’s record had been 

requested and that appellants had paid for or made arrangements to pay for the 

record or had been found entitled to proceed without payment of costs. We 
cautioned appellants that failure to provide the required documentation within ten 

days might result in the appeal being ordered submitted without the reporter’s 

record. To date, appellants have not provided the Court with documentation 

showing they have requested the reporter’s record, nor otherwise corresponded 

with the Court regarding the status of the reporter’s record. Accordingly, we 

ORDER this appeal submitted without a reporter’s record. 

Appellants’ brief is due THIRTY DAYS from the date of this order.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE