alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Publications 
-  Treesearch 
-                       Southern California Socioeconomic Assessment: Sociodemographic Conditions, Projections, and Quality of Life Indices                  

              -  Data and Tools 
              -  Publications                  -  Treesearch 
                -  Understory 
                -  National Forest Service Library 
              -  Multimedia 

# Southern California Socioeconomic Assessment: Sociodemographic Conditions, Projections, and Quality of Life Indices

| Authors: | Rachel Struglia, Patricia l. Winter, Andrea Meyer                                                                                   |
|----------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Year:    | 2003                                                                                                                                |
| Type:    | General Technical Report                                                                                                            |
| Station: | Pacific Southwest Research Station                                                                                                  |
| DOI:     | https://doi.org/10.2737/PSW-GTR-187                                                                                                 |
| Source:  | Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-GTR-187. Albany, CA: Pacific Southwest Research Station, Forest Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture; 418 p. |

Download (PDF 12.0 MB)

Cite

## Abstract

## Keywords

socioeconomic assessmentdemographic changespopulation projectionsquality of life indicatorsurban growthsouthern California

## Citation

☓
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         (59765)
<SECURITIES>                                    103000
<RECEIVABLES>                                    20000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     541997
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                666161
<PP&E>                                         3070589
<DEPRECIATION>                               (2416125)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1490671
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2916392
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             7545
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        130434
<OTHER-SE>                                   (3740683)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1490671
<SALES>                                        1113410
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1113410
<CGS>                                           980787
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1168231
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 66054
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               71866
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (120875)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (120875)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (120875)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (120875)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)
        

</TABLE>
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 128 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 23, 2007 

Received 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Authorizing the printing of a commemorative document in 

memory of the late President of the United States, Gerald Rudolph Ford. 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), 

3 SECTION 1. COMMEMORATIVE DOCUMENT AUTHORIZED. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—A commemorative document in 

5 memory of the late President of the United States, Gerald 

6 Rudolph Ford, shall be printed as a House document, with 


hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS
2 

HCON 128 RDS 

1 illustrations and suitable binding, under the direction of 

2 the Joint Committee on Printing. 

3 (b) CONTENTS.—The document shall consist of the 

4 eulogies and encomiums for Gerald Rudolph Ford, as ex5 pressed in the Senate and the House of Representatives, 

6 together with the texts of each of the following: 

7 (1) The funeral ceremony at Palm Desert, Cali8 fornia. 

9 (2) The state funeral ceremony at the rotunda 

10 of the United States Capitol. 

11 (3) The national funeral service held at the 

12 Washington National Cathedral in the District of 

13 Columbia. 

14 (4) The interment ceremony at the Gerald Ford 

15 Presidential Museum, Grand Rapids, Michigan. 

16 SEC. 2. PRINTING OF DOCUMENT. 

17 In addition to the usual number of copies printed of 

18 the commemorative document under section 1, there shall 

19 be printed the lesser of— 

20 (1) 32,500 copies, of which 22,150 copies shall 

21 be for the use of the House of Representatives and 

22 10,350 copies shall be for the use of the Senate; or 

23 (2) such number of copies that does not exceed 

24 a production and printing cost of $600,000, with 


hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS
3 

HCON 128 RDS 

1 distribution of the copies to be allocated in the same 

2 proportion as described in paragraph (1). 

Passed the House of Representatives May 22, 2007. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 


hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

(Mark One)

[x]	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2006

OR

[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ____________ to ___________

Commission file number 0-2666

250 WEST 57th ST. ASSOCIATES L.L.C.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

A New York Limited Liability Company 	13-6083380

(State or other jurisdiction of	(I.R.S. Employer

incorporation or organization)	Identification No.)

60 East 42nd Street, New York, New York 10165

(Address of principal executive offices)

(Zip Code)

(212) 687-8700

(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

N/A

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [ X ].  No [  ] .

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act) Yes [  ]  No [ X ] .

 

 

PART I.  FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.  Financial Statements.

250 West 57th St. Associates L.L.C.

(A Limited Liability Company)

Condensed Statements of Income

(Unaudited)

	For the Three Months	For the Nine Months

		Ended September 30,	Ended September 30,

	2006	2005	2006	2005

Revenues:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                    1,984,028
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                     47,976
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         208,755
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                       293,913
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,534,672
<COMMON>                                       638,957
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                            0
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                          (632,572)
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                   6,385
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                         1,209,035
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                              12,039
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                   10,500
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                    896,102
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                32,780
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 367,831
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                2,534,672
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      522,837
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                              (68)
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     404,391
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     404,323
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        118,514
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                              13,560
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 132,074
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        83,291
<NET-INCOME>                                    48,783
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                          0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   48,783
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                             0
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                            0
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                          74,030
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.52
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.52
        

</TABLE>
# C_2016364EN.01005802.xml

| 3.10.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 364/58 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.10.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 364/58

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 18 July 2016 — HE v Commission

(Case F-93/15)

(2016/C 364/77)

Language of the case: French

The Single Judge has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---
III 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 599 

Designating the week of October 23, 2006, through October 27, 2006, as 

‘‘National Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention Week’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 30 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 29), 2006 

Mr. REED (for himself, Ms. COLLINS, Mr. LAUTENBERG, Mr. LIEBERMAN, 

Mr. SARBANES, Ms. MIKULSKI, Mr. DODD, Mr. BIDEN, Mr. NELSON of 

Nebraska, Mrs. MURRAY, Mr. WYDEN, Ms. STABENOW, Ms. CANTWELL, 

Mr. FEINGOLD, Mr. INOUYE, Mr. JOHNSON, Mr. CARPER, Mr. DEWINE, 

Mr. OBAMA, Mr. CHAFEE, Mr. KERRY, Mr. DURBIN, Mr. LEVIN, Mrs. 

CLINTON, Mrs. LINCOLN, Mr. SCHUMER, Mr. BOND, Mr. SANTORUM, Mr. 

PRYOR, Ms. SNOWE, Ms. LANDRIEU, Mr. HAGEL, Mr. LEAHY, Mr. SPECTER, Mr. BAYH, Mr. MENENDEZ, Mrs. BOXER, and Mrs. FEINSTEIN) 

submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 

on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Designating the week of October 23, 2006, through October 

27, 2006, as ‘‘National Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention Week’’. 

Whereas lead poisoning is a leading environmental health 

hazard to children in the United States; 

Whereas according to the Centers for Disease Control and 

Prevention, 310,000 preschool children in the United 

States have harmful levels of lead in their blood; 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 599 IS 

Whereas lead poisoning may cause serious, long-term harm to 

children, including reduced intelligence and attention 

span, behavior problems, learning disabilities, and impaired growth; 

Whereas children from low-income families are significantly 

more likely to be poisoned by lead than are children from 

high-income families; 

Whereas children may be poisoned by lead in water, soil, or 

consumable products; 

Whereas children most often are poisoned in their homes 

through exposure to lead particles when lead-based paint 

deteriorates or is disturbed during home renovation and 

repainting; and 

Whereas lead poisoning crosses all barriers of race, income, 

and geography: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates the week of October 23, 2006, 

3 through October 27, 2006, as ‘‘National Childhood 

4 Lead Poisoning Prevention Week’’; and 

5 (2) calls upon the people of the United States 

6 to observe the week with appropriate programs and 

7 activities. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
# C_2015262EN.01004201.xml

| 10.8.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 262/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.8.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 262/42

---

Action brought on 26 May 2015 — ZZ and ZZ v Commission

(Case F-81/15)

(2015/C 262/57)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicants: ZZ and ZZ (represented by: T. Bontinck and A. Guillerme, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

A declaration of the unlawfulness of Article 45 of and Annex I to the Staff Regulations of Officials and the annulment of the decisions of the Appointing Authority not to include the applicants on the list of officials promoted to grade AST 10 in promotion year 2014.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Principally, declare the unlawfulness of Article 45 of the Staff Regulations and that of Annex I thereto, together with the transitional measures relating thereto; |
| --- | --- |

—

Principally, declare the unlawfulness of Article 45 of the Staff Regulations and that of Annex I thereto, together with the transitional measures relating thereto;

| — | Annul the decision of the Appointing Authority of 14 November 2014 not to include the applicants on the list of officials promoted to grade AST 10 in promotion year 2014 provided for in Article 45 of the Staff Regulations; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Appointing Authority of 14 November 2014 not to include the applicants on the list of officials promoted to grade AST 10 in promotion year 2014 provided for in Article 45 of the Staff Regulations;

| — | Order the Commission to pay the costs; |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Commission to pay the costs;

| — | In the alternative, annul the decision of the Appointing Authority of 14 November 2014 not to include the applicants on the list of officials promoted to grade AST 10 in promotion year 2014 provided for in Article 45 of the Staff Regulations; |
| --- | --- |

—

In the alternative, annul the decision of the Appointing Authority of 14 November 2014 not to include the applicants on the list of officials promoted to grade AST 10 in promotion year 2014 provided for in Article 45 of the Staff Regulations;

| — | Order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Commission to pay the costs.

---
KRONOS ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES, INC. SECRETARY'S AND INCUMBENCY CERTIFICATE



KRONOS ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

 SECRETARY’S AND INCUMBENCY CERTIFICATE

 

 

On this 7th day of April, 2022, the undersigned, does hereby certify that I am the Secretary of Kronos Advanced Technologies, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Corporation”), that I keep and maintain the records of the Corporation, and that I hereby certify effective as of the date of this Certificate, as follows: 

1.Attached hereto as Exhibit A is a true, complete and correct copy of the Articles of Incorporation of the Corporation filed with the Nevada Secretary of State on May 21, 1996, and all amendments thereto, and the Articles of Incorporation, as amended, are in full force and effect as of the date hereof. 

2.Attached hereto as Exhibit B is a true, complete and correct copy of the Bylaws of the Corporation dated June 20, 1996, as adopted by the shareholders of the Corporation, and the Bylaws are in full force and effect as of the date hereof. 

3.Attached hereto as Exhibit C is a true, complete and correct copy of the resolutions duly adopted by the shareholders of the Corporation through a Unanimous Written Consent to Corporate Action executed by all of the shareholders of the Corporation effective as of April 7, 2022, and said resolutions have not been modified, amended or rescinded, but remain in full force and effect as of the date hereof. 

4.Joseph L. Florence, Chief Operating Officer, is duly authorized to negotiate, execute and deliver, on behalf of the Corporation, all documentation necessary or desirable in connection with the loans in the aggregate principal amount of $2,610,000 made by the West Virginia Economic Development Authority to the Corporation and Kronos Advanced  





Technologies WV, Inc., a West Virginia corporation.  A specimen of his signature is set opposite his name below:

 

NamePositionSignature 

Joseph L. FlorenceChief Operating Officer                                      

 

5.No procedures are pending or contemplated for the dissolution of the Corporation. 

 

[Remainder of Page Intentionally Left Blank]


2




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have executed this Certificate as the Secretary of Kronos Advanced Technologies, Inc. as of the day and year first above written. 

 

___________________________________ 

Secretary 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

14774003 (1916.0939)


3





Exhibit A

 

Articles of Incorporation, together with all Amendments

 

(See Attached)





Exhibit B

 

Bylaws

 

(See Attached)





Exhibit C

 

Resolutions

 

(See Attached)
# C_2016007EN.01003702.xml

| 11.1.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 7/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.1.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 7/37

---

Action brought on 23 October 2015 — ZZ v Commission

(Case F-135/15)

(2016/C 007/50)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: B. Sahki, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision of the selection board in Competition EPSO/AST/130/14 not to admit the applicant to the assessment stage, on the ground that he did not have the required level of studies and professional experience of a minimum of six years related to the nature of the work.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the contested decision of 16 June 2014 [of] the President of the Competition selection board of the European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO), following the application of 1 April 2014; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the contested decision of 16 June 2014 [of] the President of the Competition selection board of the European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO), following the application of 1 April 2014;

| — | Annul the review decision of 4 December 2014 [of] the President of the EPSO competition selection board, following the request for review of 16 June 2014; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the review decision of 4 December 2014 [of] the President of the EPSO competition selection board, following the request for review of 16 June 2014;

| — | Annul the decision of the Appointing Authority of 6 July 2015 rejecting the claim of 3 March 2015, R/10/15; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Appointing Authority of 6 July 2015 rejecting the claim of 3 March 2015, R/10/15;

| — | Order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Commission to pay the costs.

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

In the Matter of 

ERIC IAN SCHWARTZ 

PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT 

FROM ADMINISTRATIVE SUSPENSION

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 4 DB 2016 (No. 16 RST 2016) 

Attorney Registration No. 76810 

(Chester County) 

O R D E R 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 26th day of February, 2016, the Report and Recommendation of 

Disciplinary Board Member dated February 11, 2016, is approved and it is ORDERED 

that Eric Ian Schwartz, who has been on Administrative Suspension, has never been 

suspended or disbarred, and has demonstrated that he has the moral qualifications, 

competency and learning in law required for admission to practice in the 

Commonwealth, shall be and is, hereby reinstated to active status as a member of the 

Bar of this Commonwealth. The expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation 

and processing of this matter shall be paid by the Petitioner. 

 Justice Eakin did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-7128

ROGER OSBORN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JOSEPH P. SACCHET, Warden; MARYLAND STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; MARYLAND STATE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONAL SERVICES; INCORPORATED CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES; LLOYD WATERS, Warden; ANTHONY SWETZ, Health Services, DPSCS; JOHN D. STAFFORD, Doctor, Medical Director, CMS; ALAN GRAVES, Doctor, DDS; HARRY HEISE, Doctor, DDS; DOCTOR MOUBAREK, Physician, CMS; ELEANOR BOWLES, Ms., Regional Health Care Administrator; ROBERT H. MILLER, Mr., Case Management Supervisor, Retired; OLIN BRAKE, Mr., Case Management Supervisor, MCI-H, Defendants - Appellees, and ROBERT TESTONI, Doctor, DDS, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Marvin J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-00- 1952-MJG) Submitted: October 4, 2001 Decided: October 12, 20012 Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Roger Osborn, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Glenn William Bell, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland; Philip Melton Andrews, Michael Joseph Lentz, KRAMON & GRAHAM, Baltimore, Maryland; Robert Fulton Dashiell, WARTZMAN, OMANSKY, BILBAUM, SIMONS, STEINBERG, SACHS & SAGAL, Towson, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Roger Osborn appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Osborn v. Sacchet , No. CA-00-1952-MJG (D. Md. June 15, 2001). We deny Osborn’s motion titled “Request for Time Extension.” We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED