alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 

PUBLIC MEETING ON ENERGY CONSERVATION PROGRAM FOR 

CONSUMER PRODUCTS: TEST PROCEDURES FOR RESIDENTIAL WATER 

HEATER, DIRECT HEATING EQUIPMENT, AND POOL HEATERS 

U.S. Department of Energy 

1000 Independence Avenue, SW. 

Washington, DC 20585 

Friday, September 24, 2010 

9 a.m. – 12:00 noon. ET, Room 8E-089 

Purpose 

During this meeting the Department of Energy (DOE) will present proposed amendments to

test procedures for residential water heaters, direct heating equipment, and pool heaters to 

include standby mode and off mode. This meeting is intended to familiarize interested 

stakeholders with DOE’s statutory requirements and proposed test procedures. 

Agenda 

9:00 - 9:05 am Welcome 

 U.S. Department of Energy 

9:05 - 9:15 am Opening Remarks, Introduction and Agenda Review

 Doug Brookman 

9:15 - 9:25 am Rulemaking Overview (slide 5)

 Mohammed Khan

 This is an overview of the purposes of the public meeting and the 

 statutory authority and requirements DOE has for addressing the 

 EISA 2007 requirements.

9:25 - 10:00 am Brief Opening Remarks from Interested Parties (as applicable) 

 (slide6)

 Doug Brookman 

 Interested parties are invited to make brief summary comments 

 regarding the NOPR content proposed test procedures. 

10:00 – 10:15 am Rulemaking Steps, Rulemaking History, and Discussion of 

 Proposed Amendments (slides 7-10) 

 Mohammed Khan 

 Summary presentation of rulemaking steps, history, and discussion 

 regarding the approach used and factors considered for the 

 determination of scope and test procedure revisions.

 

10:15 – 11:30 am Detailed Discussion of Proposed Amendments (slides 11- 21) 

 John Talbott 

 Summary of proposed amendments and technical details of the key 

 assumptions and positions taken. For each product, a discussion and 

 explanation of the proposed amendments will be followed by 

EERE-2009-BT-TP-0013 COMMENT 1.2.006
 opportunity for comment from participants. Presentation will proceed 

 as follows: water heaters, vented heaters, unvented heaters, and pool 

 heaters. 

11:30 – 11:45 pm Final Comments from Interested Parties

11:45 -12:00 noon Next Steps and Closing (slide 22)

 Mohammed Khan 

 

12:00 noon Adjourn

EERE-2009-BT-TP-0013 COMMENT 1.2.006
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v HORACE H. YELVERTON, Sergeant, U. S. Army, Appellant

8 USCMA 424, 24 CMR 234

No. 10,009

Decided November 15, 1957

*Major Edward Fenig*and *First Lieutenant William H. Carpenter*were on the brief for Appellant, Accused.

*Lieutenant Colonel Thomas J. Newton*was on the brief for Appellee, United States.

Opinion of the Court

Homer Ferguson, Judge:

The issue raised in this case is the same as that in United States v Rine-hart, 8 USCMA 402, 24 CMR 212, decided this date. For the reason stated in our opinion in that case, the decision of the board of review is reversed. The record of trial is returned to The Judge Advocate General of the Army. A rehearing on the sentence is ordered.

Chief Judge Quinn concurs.

Judge Latimer dissents.
(logo) Deutsche Bank

1761 East St. Andrew Place

Santa Ana, CA 92705-4934

 

Tel 714 247 6000

Fax 714 247 6009 

 

 

ANNUAL STATEMENT AS TO COMPLIANCE

 

COMM 2016-DC2

 

The undersigned, dulyauthorized officers of Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as the CertificateAdministrator (a "Certifying Servicer") under the Pooling andServicing Agreement, dated as of March 1, 2016 (the "Agreement''), by andamong, Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation, as Depositor, WellsFargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer and Special Servicer,Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee, Deutsche Bank Trust CompanyAmericas, as Certificate Administrator, Paying Agent, and Custodian, Park BridgeLender Services LLC, as Operating Advisor, and Park Bridge Lender Services LLC,as Asset Representations Reviewer here by certifies in accordance with Section10.11 of the Agreement:

 

A) Areview of such Certifying Servicer's activities from January 1, 2018 toDecember 31, 2018 (the "reporting period") and of such CertifyingServicer's performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer'ssupervision and

B)That, as to the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, suchCertifying Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement, inall material respects throughout the reporting period.

 

 

DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANYAMERICAS

as Certificate Administrator

 

 

/s/ Ronaldo Reyes

BY: Ronaldo Reyes

Title: Vice President

Date: March 1, 2019

 

 

/s/ Karlene Collins

BY: Karlene Collins

Title: Assistant VicePresident

Date: March 1, 2019
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Trade and Development Agency

# AGENCY:

Trade and Development Agency. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

Notice is hereby given of the appointment of members of the Trade and Development Agency's Performance Review Board. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Carolyn Hum, Administrative Officer, Trade and Development Agency, 1000 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 1600, Arlington, VA 22209 (703) 875-4357. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Section 4314(c)(1) through (5), U.S.C., requires each agency to establish, in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Office of Personnel Management, one or more SES performance review boards. The board shall review and evaluate the initial appraisal of a senior executive's performance by the supervisor, along with any recommendations to the appointing authority relative to the performance of the senior executive. 

The following have been selected as acting members of the Performance Review Board of the Trade and Development Agency: Leocadia Zak, Deputy Director, U.S. Trade and Development Agency; Geoffrey Jackson, Director for Policy and Program, U.S. Trade and Development Agency; Thomas Hardy, Chief of Staff, U.S. Trade and Development Agency; and James Wilderotter, General Counsel, U.S. Trade and Development Agency. 

Dated: April 25, 2007. 

Carolyn Hum, 

Administrative Officer.

[FR Doc. E7-8294 Filed 4-30-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8040-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                            MAR-31-2000
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                        941448
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                       941448
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                         941448
<EQUITIES>                                     338
<MORTGAGE>                                       0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                    0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                              941786
<CASH>                                       19382
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                           55104
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                       24698
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             1354793
<POLICY-LOSSES>                             274074
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                         243050
<POLICY-OTHER>                                   0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                            0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                              45000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                    415735
<OTHER-SE>                                  293092
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               1354793
<PREMIUMS>                                  200272
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                          13050
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                           (3743)
<OTHER-INCOME>                                   0
<BENEFITS>                                  178857
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                  21690
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                          1137
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                549
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (3106)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           3655
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                  3655
<EPS-BASIC>                                  .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .04
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                   0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                              0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                               0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                 0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                  0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                          0


</TABLE>
Before the First Division,

April 18, 1950

No. 54248.

#### Anglo Persian Mercantile Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 118619-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
R95 W R94W AW R93 W
t Figure 2-1

Oil & Gas
Phased Development Areas

T4s
Rio Blanco Co. a Roan Plateau RMPA/EIS
% August 2008

meee eee bagand

Garfield Gos 2 ‘Of & Gas Phased Development Areas
[Roan Plateau Planning Area

DE sae-specitc Relocation (SSRICSU)

[HEB No Ground Distrurbance (NGDANSO)

T4S

Standard Restrictions and Limitations
|| Private Surface/Subsurface
He BLM Oustide Planning Area
4 Dar ntinerais
7 r 2G Coat
8 ° 0 re BSS ot end cas
(25) of, Gas, and Coal

peed | Somer

IS 5S

rs) 28 a

31 32 s u

16S an < mm /\ =

: Scale 1:150,000
Bureau of Land Managmenrt
Glenwood Springs Field Office

U\Projects\Roan_Platlupdate_November_2005imeps\prep'sed_stipuletions mid

R96W R95 W R94w
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of United Refining Company, a Pennsylvania corporation (the Company), does hereby certify, to
such officers knowledge, that:



The
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended February 28, 2011 (the Form 10-Q) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information
contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |  |  |     |  |                          |  |                            
|--------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ------------------------ |  | ---------------------------
|                      |  |  | 
|Dated: April 14, 2011 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ John A. Catsimatidis
|                      |  |  |  |     |  |                          |  | John A. Catsimatidis       
|                      |  |  |  |     |  |                          |  | Principal Executive Officer



|                      |  |  |  |     |  |                     |  |                            
|--------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ------------------- |  | ---------------------------
|                      |  |  | 
|Dated: April 14, 2011 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ James E. Murphy
|                      |  |  |  |     |  |                     |  | James E. Murphy            
|                      |  |  |  |     |  |                     |  | Principal Financial Officer
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION Ill 1650 Arch Street Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103-2029

Michael L. Krancer, Secretary Pennsylvania Department ofEnvironmental Protection Rachel Carson State Office Building P. 

### 0. Box 2063 Harrisburg, PA 17105-2063 Dear Secretary Krancer: 

### JAN 311013

On September 27, 2012, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) received a Revision to the Pennsylvania State Implementation Plan (SIP) from the Pennsylvania Department ofEnvironmental Protection pertaining to the section 110(a)(2) Clean Air Act infrastructure requirements for the 2008 National Ambient Air Quality Standard for Lead. EPA has determined that the submittal is administratively and technically complete, and is reviewing itto prepare a Notice ofProposed Rulemaking (NPR) action. Ifmembers ofyour staffhave any questions, they may direct them toMs. Ruth Knapp, Office ofAir Program Planning, at (215) 814-2191. She is the principal contact for this rulemak:ing. Sincerely,

DianaEsher, Director Air Protection Division

cc: Joyce E. Epps, Director Bureau ofAir Quality Dean Van Orden, Assistant Director Bureau ofAir Quality

Customer Service Hotline: 1-800-438-2474
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     Article 5 Fin. Data Schedule for 3rd Qtr 10-Q
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                          0000100625
<NAME>                         Sierra Monitor Corporation
<MULTIPLIER>                                  1,000
       
<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-1994
<PERIOD-START>                                JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                                  SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                                879
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                         952
<ALLOWANCES>                                           45
<INVENTORY>                                           539
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    2,652
<PP&E>                                                942
<DEPRECIATION>                                        827
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      2,804
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                 560
<BONDS>                                                 0
<COMMON>                                            2,903
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                              0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        2,804
<SALES>                                             3,559
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    3,559
<CGS>                                               1,379
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       1,379
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    2,124
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    (23)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        79
<INCOME-TAX>                                           10
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    69
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                           69
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         .01
        


</TABLE>
polid stid cyid year sector adjacee

NH3 39 23 2007area 47.94716641 Sector Ammonia NH3 39 57 2007area 37.63922853 Point 5.97 NH3 39 113 2007area 175.8920925 Area 1,827.40 NH3 39 113 2007egu_point 0.082699239 Non-road 4.58 NH3 39 23 2007marairrail 0.10537604 On-road 448.23 NH3 39 57 2007marairrail 0.029090132 Total 2,286.19 NH3 39 113 2007marairrail 0.279591852 NH3 39 23 2007 MOVES 74.29646893 NH3 39 57 2007 MOVES 68.49622559 NH3 39 113 2007 MOVES 305.4387454 NH3 39 23 2007nh3 752.8480254 NH3 39 57 2007nh3 478.7173493 NH3 39 113 2007nh3 334.3605785 NH3 39 23 2007nonegu_pt 0.386549858 NH3 39 57 2007nonegu_pt 2.616653932 NH3 39 113 2007nonegu_pt 2.886631721 NH3 39 23 2007nonroad 0.640359923 NH3 39 57 2007nonroad 0.899325649 NH3 39 113 2007nonroad 2.629054807 2,286.19 ROG 39 23 2007area 1740.12434 ROG 39 57 2007area 1636.692764 ROG 39 113 2007area 7955.9959 ROG 39 113 2007egu_point 8.392758396 ROG 39 23 2007marairrail 17.49379557 ROG 39 57 2007marairrail 3.412410384 ROG 39 113 2007marairrail 96.26354239 ROG 39 23 2007nonegu_pt 183.2316059 ROG 39 57 2007nonegu_pt 15.82013259 ROG 39 113 2007nonegu_pt 1066.381175 ROG 39 23 2007nonroad 630.7564251 ROG 39 57 2007nonroad 747.4607098 ROG 39 113 2007nonroad 2508.084454 TOG 39 23 2007 MOVES 1557.238533 TOG 39 57 2007 MOVES 1403.267505 TOG 39 113 2007 MOVES 6309.925171 25,880.54

Emissions in tons per yearVOC

1,273.83 11,332.81 4,003.47 9,270.43 25,880.54
|  EXHIBIT 32.2                               |
|--------------------------------------------------|
|  Union Carbide Corporation and Subsidiaries |
|                                             |

| 1. | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Corporation for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation. |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/ EUDIO GIL                                                 |   |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
| Eudio GilVice President, Treasurer andChief Financial Officer |   |   |
| Date: May 4, 2010                                             |   |   |

----
III 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 92 

Expressing the sense of the Senate that judicial determinations regarding 

the meaning of the Constitution of the United States should not be 

based on judgments, laws, or pronouncements of foreign institutions 

unless such foreign judgments, laws, or pronouncements inform an understanding of the original meaning of the Constitution of the United 

States. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 20, 2005 

Mr. CORNYN submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the Senate that judicial determinations regarding the meaning of the Constitution of the 

United States should not be based on judgments, laws, 

or pronouncements of foreign institutions unless such 

foreign judgments, laws, or pronouncements inform an 

understanding of the original meaning of the Constitution of the United States. 

Whereas the Declaration of Independence announced that one 

of the chief causes of the American Revolution was that 

King George had ‘‘combined with others to subject us to 

a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and 

unacknowledged by our laws’’; 
2

•SRES 92 IS

Whereas the Supreme Court has recently relied on the judgments, laws, or pronouncements of foreign institutions to 

support its interpretations of the laws of the United 

States, most recently in Atkins v. Virginia, 536 U.S. 304, 

316 n.21 (2002), Lawrence v. Texas, 539 U.S. 558, 573 

(2003), and Roper v. Simmons, 125 S.Ct. 1183, 1198–

99 (2005); 

Whereas the Supreme Court has stated previously in Printz 

v. United States, 521 U.S. 898, 921 n.11 (1997), that 

‘‘We think such comparative analysis inappropriate to the 

task of interpreting a constitution . . .’’; 

Whereas the ability of Americans to live their lives within 

clear legal boundaries is the foundation of the rule of law, 

and essential to freedom; 

Whereas it is the appropriate judicial role to faithfully interpret the expression of the popular will through the Constitution and laws enacted by duly elected representatives 

of the American people and under our system of checks 

and balances; 

Whereas Americans should not have to look for guidance on 

how to live their lives from the often contradictory decisions of any of hundreds of other foreign organizations; 

and 

Whereas inappropriate judicial reliance on foreign judgments, 

laws, or pronouncements threatens the sovereignty of the 

United States, the separation of powers, and the President’s and the Senate’s treaty-making authority: Now, 

therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that judi2 cial interpretations regarding the meaning of the Constitu3 tion of the United States should not be based in whole 
3 

•SRES 92 IS

1 or in part on judgments, laws, or pronouncements of for2 eign institutions unless such foreign judgments, laws, or 

3 pronouncements inform an understanding of the original 

4 meaning of the Constitution of the United States. 

Æ
# C_2016364EN.01003502.xml

| 3.10.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 364/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.10.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 364/35

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 20 July 2016 — GY v Commission

(Case F-123/15) (1)

((Civil service - Open Competition - Notice of competition EPSO/AD/293/14 - Insufficient number of points in the ‘Talent Screen Test’ - Non-admission to the assessment centre - Rejection of the request for review))

(2016/C 364/42)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: GY (represented by: S. Orlandi and T. Martin, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Gattinara and F. Simonetti, acting as Agents)

Re:

Annulment of the decision of the selection board in competition EPSO/AD/293/14 not to award the applicant a sufficient number of points for admission to the assessment centre.

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of 11 June 2015 by which the selection board of Open Competition EPSO/AD/293/14 refused to admit GY to the selection tests organised at the assessment centre; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of 11 June 2015 by which the selection board of Open Competition EPSO/AD/293/14 refused to admit GY to the selection tests organised at the assessment centre;

| 2. | Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by GY. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by GY.

---

(1)  OJ C 398, 30/11/2015, p. 79.

---