alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### SERVED: FEBRUARY 9, 2016 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC
IN THE MATTER OF TANGO AIR, INC., d/b/a SCHUBACH AVIATION DOCKETNO. FAA-2015-3317 (Civil Penalty Action)


### NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2015WP090037) 

### has been assigned to Administrative LawJudge J.E. Sullivan. All future pleadings and other communications regarding this proceeding shall be served onthe Judge, the FAAHearing Docket, and the other persons onthe attached Service List.

Attachment

- Service ListDocketNo. FAA-2015-3317 (Civil Penalty Action)


### SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL ORIGINAL & ONE COPY Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W10001 

### ONE COPY President Tango 

### Air, Inc., Respondent 2026 PalomarAirport Road, Hangar 2 Carlsbad, CA 92011 Robert Spitzer, Complainant's Counsel Office ofthe Regional Counsel, ANM-7 Federal Aviation Administration EnforcementDivision, Western Team 1601 Lind Avenue, S.W. Renton, WA 98057 TEL: 425-227-1417 FAX: 425-227-1007 Hon. J.E. Sullivan,

### Administrative Law Judge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-6941 FAX: 202-366-7536 Michael L. Dworkin, Respondent's Counsel Michael L. Dworkin and Associates 465 California Street, Suite 210 SanFrancisco, CA 94104 FAX: 415-421-2560

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service

## m person or by expedited courier, use**th~** following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

### -2-
# C_2017161EN.01002401.xml

| 22.5.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 161/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.5.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 161/24

---

Judgment of the General Court of 6 April 2017 — Metabolic Balance Holding v EUIPO (Metabolic Balance)

(Case T-594/15) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Application for the EU figurative mark Metabolic Balance - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptiveness - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2017/C 161/33)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Metabolic Balance Holding GmbH (Isen, Germany) (represented by: W. Riegger, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Fischer and J. Németh, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 12 August 2015 (Case R 2156/2014-1), concerning an application for registration of the figurative sign Metabolic Balance as an EU trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Metabolic Balance Holding GmbH to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by EUIPO. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Metabolic Balance Holding GmbH to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by EUIPO.

---

(1)  OJ C 398, 30.11.2015.

1

---
# C_2016136EN.01000602.xml

| 18.4.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 136/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.4.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 136/6

---

Appeal brought on 14 April 2015 by Enercon GmbH against the judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 28 January 2015 in Case T-655/13, Enercon GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Enercon GmbH

Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

(Case C-170/15 P)

(2016/C 136/10)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Enercon GmbH (represented by: R. Böhm, Rechtsanwalt)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Other party to the proceedings:

By order of 21 January 2016 the Court of Justice of the European Union (Sixth Chamber) dismissed the appeal and ordered the appellant to bear its own costs.

---
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 81 (Friday, April 27, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21053-21054]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-8108]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[SGA/DFA-PY 06-04]


Solicitation for Grant Applications (SGA); Migrants and Seasonal 
Farmworkers Program SGA--National Farmworker Jobs Program

AGENCY: Employment and Training Administration (ETA), Labor.

ACTION: Notice: Amendment to SGA/DFA-PY-06-04.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Employment and Training Administration published a 
document in the Federal Register on April 20, 2007, announcing the 
availability of funds and solicitation for grant applications (SGA) for 
the National Farmworker Jobs Program (NFJP), under section 167 of the 
Workforce Investment Act of 1998. This notice is an amendment to the 
SGA and it amends the Application and Submission Information section to 
correct the Funding Opportunity Number.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: James Stockton, Grant Officer, 
Division of Federal Assistance, at (202) 693-3335.

[[Page 21054]]

    Supplementary Information Correction: In the Federal Register of 
April 20, 2007, in FR Doc. E7-7497. The next to the last sentence under 
the paragraph entitled ``Submission Dates and Times'' (page 19975). 
``Reference SGA/DFA PY 04-06 is amended to read'', ``Reference SGA/DFA 
PY 06-04.''
    Effective Date: This notice is effective April 27, 2007.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 22nd day of February, 2007.
James W. Stockton,
Grant Officer.
 [FR Doc. E7-8108 Filed 4-26-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE BODY OF THE ACCOMPANYING FORM 10-Q AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                         1,000

<S>                                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                     6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                 DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                      JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                            18,282
<SECURITIES>                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     45,692
<ALLOWANCES>                                      0
<INVENTORY>                                       55,423
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  128,987
<PP&E>                                            124,121
<DEPRECIATION>                                    89,979
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    213,694
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             63,768
<BONDS>                                           3,783
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<COMMON>                                          14,374
<OTHER-SE>                                        99,549
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      213,694
<SALES>                                           110,861
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  112,787
<CGS>                                             83,363
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     105,294
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                17
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   7,476
<INCOME-TAX>                                      2,681
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               4,795
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                      4,795
<EPS-BASIC>                                       .39
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .38


</TABLE>
# C_2015294EN.01003701.xml

| 7.9.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 294/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.9.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 294/37

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France) lodged on 25 June 2015 — Vincent Deroo-Blanquart v Sony Europe Limited, successor in law to Sony France SA

(Case C-310/15)

(2015/C 294/47)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Referring court

Cour de cassation

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Vincent Deroo-Blanquart

Applicant:

Defendant: Sony Europe Limited, successor in law to Sony France SA

Defendant:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Must Articles 5 and 7 of Directive 2005/29 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2005 concerning unfair business-to-consumer commercial practices in the internal market (1) be interpreted as meaning that a combined offer consisting of the sale of a computer equipped with pre-installed software constitutes a misleading unfair commercial practice where the manufacturer of the computer has, via its retailer, provided information on each item of pre-installed software, but has not specified the cost of each individual component? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Must Articles 5 and 7 of Directive 2005/29 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2005 concerning unfair business-to-consumer commercial practices in the internal market (1) be interpreted as meaning that a combined offer consisting of the sale of a computer equipped with pre-installed software constitutes a misleading unfair commercial practice where the manufacturer of the computer has, via its retailer, provided information on each item of pre-installed software, but has not specified the cost of each individual component?

1

| 2. | Must Article 5 of Directive 2005/29 be interpreted as meaning that a combined offer consisting of the sale of a computer equipped with pre-installed software constitutes an unfair commercial practice where the manufacturer leaves the consumer no choice other than to accept the software or cancel the sale? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Must Article 5 of Directive 2005/29 be interpreted as meaning that a combined offer consisting of the sale of a computer equipped with pre-installed software constitutes an unfair commercial practice where the manufacturer leaves the consumer no choice other than to accept the software or cancel the sale?

| 3. | Must Article 5 of Directive 2005/29 be interpreted as meaning that a combined offer consisting of the sale of a computer equipped with pre-installed software constitutes an unfair commercial practice where the consumer is unable to obtain a computer which is not equipped with software from the computer manufacturer? |
| --- | --- |

3.

Must Article 5 of Directive 2005/29 be interpreted as meaning that a combined offer consisting of the sale of a computer equipped with pre-installed software constitutes an unfair commercial practice where the consumer is unable to obtain a computer which is not equipped with software from the computer manufacturer?

---

(1)  OJ 2005 L 149, p. 22.

1

---
MENDOCINO

LAKE

TEHAMA

BUTTE

GLENN

YOLO

SONOMA

NAPA

COLUSA

MONTEREY

SOLANO

MARIN

SANTA CLARA

ALAMEDA

SUTTER

TRINITY

HUMBOLDT

CONTRA COSTA

YUBA

SAN MATEO

SANTA CRUZ

SAN JOAQUIN

SACRAMENTO

SAN BENITO

PLACER

SAN FRANCISCO

STANISLAUS

PLUMAS

 ̄ 0 6 12 18 24 3

Nautical Miles

ATTENTION USER: This map is a product of the Minerals Management Service (MMS),

which is an agency of the U.S. Department of the Interior. The mission of MMS

is to manage the mineral resources of the Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) in an 

environmentally sound and safe manner and to timely collect, verify and distribute

mineral revenues from Federal and Indian lands. 

The MMS does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of this map nor assume any

reponsibility or liability for any reliance action. This map is not intended for use as

a navigational tool nor as a legal document for Federal leasing purposes.

Programmatic EIS for Outer Continental Shelf Renewable Energy and Alternate Use

Not For Navigational Use Central California OCS Planning Area

Current Uses on the Outer Continental Shelf

60

Federal

Boundary

-

State

Scale: 1:850,000

California North Central Valley

Wildlife Management Area

San 

Pablo 

Bay

National 

Wildlife 

Refuge

Don Edwards

San Francisco

National Wildlife Refuge

Legend

Federal - State Boundary

Traffic Separation Scheme

Bathymetric Contour (feet)

Ecological Preserve

National Marine Sanctuary

OCS Planning Area

Area of Special Biological Significance

National Wildlife Refuge

Military Warning Zone

County

2508

Stone Lakes

National Wildlife Refuge

Butte Sink

Wildlife Management Area

Willow Creek

 - Lurline

Wildlife 

Management 

Area

Sutter

National Wildlife Refuge

Golden Gate

National Recreation Area

P o i n t

R e y e s

N a t i o n a l

S e a s h o r e
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and § 225.41 of the Board’s Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).

The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for inspection at the office of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later than January 24, 2007.

**A. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City**                     (Donna J. Ward, Assistant Vice President) 925 Grand Avenue, Kansas City, Missouri 64198-0001:                

*1. Kris Ann Carson*, Mulvane, Kansas; as co-trustee of the Frank L. Carson, III Trust No. 1, to retain voting shares of Mulvane Bankshares, Inc., and thereby indirectly retain voting shares of Mulvane State Bank, both in Mulvane, Kansas.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, January 4, 2007.

Robert deV. Frierson,

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. E7-83 Filed 1-8-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
# C_2015138EN.01002701.xml

| 27.4.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 138/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.4.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 138/27

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht München (Germany) lodged on 21 January 2015 — Josef Plöckl v Finanzamt Schrobenhausen

(Case C-24/15)

(2015/C 138/38)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Finanzgericht München

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Josef Plöckl

Applicant:

Defendant: Finanzamt Schrobenhausen

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Do Article 22(8), the first subparagraph of Article 28c(A)(a) and Article 28c(A)(d) of Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC (1) of 17 May 1977 permit Member States to refuse to grant a tax exemption in respect of an intra-Community supply (in this instance, an intra-Community transfer) where, although the supplier has not taken all the measures that can reasonably be expected of him from the point of view of the formal requirements applicable to the recording of the [VAT] identification number, there is no specific evidence of tax evasion, the goods have been moved to another Member State and the other conditions of exemption from tax are also met?

1

---

(1)  Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonization of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment (OJ 1977 L 145, p. 1).

1

---
(Reap. Dec. 8961)

Entry No. 1004, etc.

#### F. W. Woolworth Company *v.*United States

(Decided August 15, 1957)

*Sharretts, Paley & Carter (Howard Clare Carter*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General *(Daniel I. Auster,*trial attorney), for the defendant.

*622Olivee, Chief Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement enumerated in schedule “A,” attached hereto and made a part hereof, relate to certain glass Christmas tree ornaments exported from the Western Zone of Germany, directly or indirectly, by Lauscher Glasindustrie or Siegfried Heinkelein and entered at Baltimore, Md.

The cases are before me on a written stipulation of submission that shows export value, as defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for appraisement of the articles in question, and that establishes such statutory value for the merchandise in each case to be the appraised value, less the amounts added under duress, packing included, and I so hold. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
<PAGE>   1


                                                                EXHIBIT 10.18(c)

                    AMENDMENT #2 TO THE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
                                    BETWEEN
                          INTROGEN THERAPEUTICS, INC.
                                      AND
                                 DAVID G. NANCE

         Introgen Therapeutics, Inc. ("Company") and David G. Nance ("Employee")
hereby agree to the following amendments to the Employment Agreement
("Employment Agreement") dated August 1, 1996, between Company and Employee,
which Employment Agreement was previously amended by Amendment #1 effective as
of August 1, 1998:

         Paragraph 2, providing the term of the Agreement ("Term") is amended
as follows:

         The date "July 31, 1999," set forth in the first sentence of Paragraph
         2, is changed to "July 31, 2003." The remainder of Paragraph 2 shall
         remain in full force and effect.

         Paragraph 3 is deleted and replaced with the following new paragraph 3:

         "3. COMPENSATION. Employee shall receive an aggregate base salary at
         the rate of $275,000 per annum until July 31, 2000. Employee's base
         salary will be raised by 10% effective August 1, 2000, by an
         additional 10% effective August 1, 20001, and by an additional 10%
         effective August 1, 2002. Employee will be granted options to purchase
         50,000 shares of the Corporation's common stock pursuant to the
         Company's 2000 Stock Plan on August 1, 2000, August 1, 2001, and
         August 1, 2002 (for a total of 150,000 shares). Such options will be
         exercisable at a price determined by the Plan Administrator, but no
         greater than the fair market value of the underlying shares on the
         date of each grant, and will vest in full when granted. Installments
         of base salary shall be paid not less often than bi-weekly. Employee
         may be paid bonuses (in stock, cash or other consideration) from
         time-to-time as determined by the Board of Directors or the
         Compensation Committee."

         This Amendment #2 is conditioned upon and shall become effective upon
closing for an Initial Public Offering of the Company's securities.

         Except as amended herein, the Employment Agreement shall continue in
full force and effect.

         Signed this 15th day of February, 2000.

                                      COMPANY:

                                      INTROGEN THERAPEUTICS, INC.


                                      By: /s/ JAMES W. ALBRECHT, JR.
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          James W. Albrecht, Jr., Vice President
                                          and Chief Financial Officer


                                      EMPLOYEE:

                                      /s/ DAVID G. NANCE
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                      David G. Nance
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Archives and Records Administration

###### Information Security Oversight Office 

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. app 2) and implementing regulation 41 CFR 101.6, announcement is made for the following committee meeting: 

*Name of Committee:*                         National Industrial Security Program Policy Advisory Committee (NISPPAC).                     

*Date of Meeting:*                         May 16, 2007.                     

*Time of Meeting:*                         10 a.m.-12 noon.                     

*Place of Meeting:*                         National Archives and Records Administration, 700 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Archivist's Reception Room, Room 105, Washington, DC 20408.                     

*Purpose:*                         To discuss National Industrial Security Program policy matters.                     

This meeting will be open to the public. However, due to space limitations and access procedures, the name and telephone number of individuals planning to attend must be submitted to the Information Security Oversight Office (ISOO) no later than Thursday, April 26, 2007. ISOO will provide additional instructions for gaining access to the location of the meeting. 

*For Further Information Contact:*                         Patrick Viscuso, Senior Program Analyst, Information Security Oversight Office, National Archives Building, 700 Pennsylvania Avenue, Washington, DC 20408, telephone number (202) 387-5313.                     

*Supplementary Information:*

Agenda 

(1) Industry Presentation; 

(2) NISP Signatory Update; and 

(3) General Open Forum. 

Dated: April 23, 2007. 

Mary Ann Hadyka, 

Committee Management Officer. 

[FR Doc. E7-8062 Filed 4-26-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7515-01-P