Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 83 / Tuesday, May 1, 2007 / Notices 23799 

1 In comments made on the interim final sunset 

regulations, a number of parties stated that the 

proposed five-day period for rebuttals to 

substantive responses to a notice of initiation was 

insufficient. This requirement was retained in the 

final sunset regulations at 19 CFR 351.218(d)(4). As 

provided in 19 CFR 351.302(b), however, the 

Department will consider individual requests for 

extension of that five-day deadline based upon a 

showing of good cause. 

Dated: April 23, 2007. 

Stephen J. Claeys, 

Deputy Assistant Secretaryfor Import 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. E7–8284 Filed 4–30–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE: 3510–DS–S 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

Initiation of Five–Year (‘‘Sunset’’) 

Reviews 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: In accordance with section 

751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (‘‘the Act’’), the Department of 

Commerce (‘‘the Department’’) is 

automatically initiating a five–year 

review (‘‘Sunset Review’’) of the 

antidumping duty order listed below. 

The International Trade Commission 

(‘‘the Commission’’) is publishing 

concurrently with this notice its notice 

of Institution of Five–Year Review 

which covers the same order. 

EFFECTIVE DATE: May 1, 2007. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Juanita Chen, AD/CVD Operations, 

Import Administration, International 

Trade Administration, U.S. Department 

of Commerce, 14th Street & Constitution 

Ave., NW, Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–1904. For 

information from the Commission, 

contact Mary Messer, Office of 

Investigations, U.S. International Trade 

Commission at (202) 205–3193. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

The Department’s procedures for the 

conduct of Sunset Reviews are set forth 

in its Procedures for Conducting Five– 

Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Reviews of 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Orders, 63 FR 13516 (March 20, 1998) 

and 70 FR 62061 (October 28, 2005). 

Guidance on methodological or 

analytical issues relevant to the 

Department’s conduct of Sunset 

Reviews is set forth in the Department’s 

Policy Bulletin 98.3 - Policies Regarding 

the Conduct of Five–Year (‘‘Sunset’’) 

Reviews of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Orders; Policy 

Bulletin, 63 FR 18871 (April 16, 1998) 

(‘‘Sunset Policy Bulletin’’). 

Initiation of Reviews 

In accordance with 19 CFR 

351.218(c), we are initiating the Sunset 

Review of the following antidumping 

duty order: 

DOC Case No. ITC.Case No. Country Product 

A–570–868 ........................................................................................... 731–TA–932 PRC Folding Metal Tables and Chairs 

Countervailing Duty Proceedings.

No Sunset Reviews of countervailing duty orders are scheduled for 

initiation in May 2007..

Suspended Investigations.

No Sunset Reviews of suspended investigations are scheduled for 

initiation in May 2007..

Filing Information 

As a courtesy, we are making 

information related to Sunset 

proceedings, including copies of the 

Department’s regulations regarding 

Sunset Reviews (19 CFR 351.218) and 

Sunset Policy Bulletin, the Department’s 

schedule of Sunset Reviews, case 

history information (i.e., previous 

margins, duty absorption 

determinations, scope language, import 

volumes), and service lists available to 

the public on the Department’s sunset 

Internet website at the following 

address: ‘‘http://ia.ita.doc.gov/sunset.’’ 

All submissions in these Sunset 

Reviews must be filed in accordance 

with the Department’s regulations 

regarding format, translation, service, 

and certification of documents. These 

rules can be found at 19 CFR 351.303. 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.103(c), the 

Department will maintain and make 

available a service list for these 

proceedings. To facilitate the timely 

preparation of the service list(s), it is 

requested that those seeking recognition 

as interested parties to a proceeding 

contact the Department in writing 

within 10 days of the publication of this 

notice of initiation. 

Because deadlines in Sunset Reviews 

can be very short, we urge interested 

parties to apply for access to proprietary 

information under administrative 

protective order (‘‘APO’’) immediately 

following publication in the Federal 

Register of the notice of initiation of the 

sunset review. The Department’s 

regulations on submission of proprietary 

information and eligibility to receive 

access to business proprietary 

information under APO can be found at 

19 CFR 351.304–306. 

Information Required from Interested 

Parties 

Domestic interested parties (defined 

in section 771(9)(C), (D), (E), (F), and (G) 

of the Act and 19 CFR 351.102(b)) 

wishing to participate in these Sunset 

Reviews must respond not later than 15 

days after the date of publication in the 

Federal Register of this notice of 

initiation by filing a notice of intent to 

participate. The required contents of the 

notice of intent to participate are set 

forth at 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(ii). In 

accordance with the Department’s 

regulations, if we do not receive a notice 

of intent to participate from at least one 

domestic interested party by the 15–day 

deadline, the Department will 

automatically revoke the orders without 

further review. See 19 CFR 

351.218(d)(1)(iii). 

If we receive an order–specific notice 

of intent to participate from a domestic 

interested party, the Department’s 

regulations provide that all parties 

wishing to participate in the Sunset 

Review must file complete substantive 

responses not later than 30 days after 

the date of publication in the Federal 

Register of this notice of initiation. The 

required contents of a substantive 

response, on an order–specific basis, are 

set forth at 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3). Note 

that certain information requirements 

differ for respondent and domestic 

parties. Also, note that the Department’s 

information requirements are distinct 

from the Commission’s information 

requirements. Please consult the 

Department’s regulations for 

information regarding the Department’s 

conduct of Sunset Reviews.1 Please 

consult the Department’s regulations at 

19 CFR Part 351 for definitions of terms 

and for other general information 

concerning antidumping and 


rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with MISCELLANEOUS
23800 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 83 / Tuesday, May 1, 2007 / Notices 

countervailing duty proceedings at the 

Department. 

This notice of initiation is being 

published in accordance with section 

751(c) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(c). 

Dated: April 23, 2007. 

Stephen J. Claeys, 

Deputy Assistant Secretaryfor Import 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. E7–8285 Filed 4–30–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE: 3510–DS–S 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

(A–469–814) 

Chlorinated Isocyanurates from Spain: 

Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary 

Results of the First Administrative 

Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

EFFECTIVE DATE: May 1, 2007. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Thomas Martin or Mark Manning at 

(202) 482–3936 or (202) 482–5253, 

respectively; AD/CVD Operations, 

Office 4, Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 

Street and Constitution Avenue, NW, 

Washington, DC 20230. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On July 27, 2006, the Department of 

Commerce (the Department) initiated an 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on chlorinated 

isocyanurates from Spain, for the period 

December 20, 2004, to May 31, 2006. 

See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative 

Reviews and Request for Revocation in 

Part, 71 FR 42626 (July 27, 2006). On 

February 16, 2007, the Department 

partially extended the preliminary 

results of the administrative review. See 

Chlorinated Isocyanurates From Spain: 

Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary 

Results of the First Administrative 

Review, 72 FR 7603 (February 16, 2007). 

Extension of Time Limits for 

Preliminary Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review 

Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act 

of 1930, as amended (the Act) and 19 

CFR 351.213(h)(1) require the 

Department to issue the preliminary 

results of an administrative review 

within 245 days after the last day of the 

anniversary month of the order for 

which the administrative review was 

requested, and the final results of the 

review within 120 days after the date on 

which the notice of the preliminary 

results was published in the Federal 

Register. However, if the Department 

determines that it is not practicable to 

complete the review within these time 

periods, section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act 

and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(2) allow the 

Department to extend the 245-day 

period to 365 days and the 120-day 

period to 180 days. 

The preliminary results were 

originally due on March 2, 2007. On 

February 16, 2007, the Department 

partially extended the preliminary 

results of the administrative review, to 

June 1, 2007. See Chlorinated 

Isocyanurates From Spain: Extension of 

Time Limit for Preliminary Results of 

the First Administrative Review, 72 FR 

7603 (February 16, 2007). We determine 

that it is not practicable to complete the 

preliminary results of this 

administrative review by the current 

deadline of June 1, 2007. The 

Department requires additional time to 

obtain more information regarding 

certain sales and cost of production 

issues, and to conduct verification of 

Aragonesas Industrias y Energ[iacute]a 

S.A.’s submissions. Therefore, in 

accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A) of 

the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(2), the 

Department is extending the time limit 

for the completion of these preliminary 

results by an additional 30 days, to July 

2, 2007. The final results will be due 

120 days after the date of issuance of the 

preliminary results, unless extended. 

This notice is issued and published in 

accordance with sections 751(a)(3)(A) 

and 777(i)(1) of the Act. 

Dated: April 24, 2007. 

Stephen J. Claeys, 

Deputy Assistant Secretaryfor Import 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. E7–8280 Filed 4–30–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–552–851] 

Notice of Amended Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review: Certain Frozen Fish Fillets 

from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On March 21, 2007, the 

Department of Commerce (the 

‘‘Department’’) published in the Federal 

Register the final results of the second 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on certain 

frozen fish fillets from the Socialist 

Republic of Vietnam (‘‘Vietnam’’). See 

Notice of Final Results of the Second 

Administrative Review: Certain Frozen 

Fish Fillets and Socialist Republic of 

Vietnam, 72 FR 13242 (March 21, 2007) 

and accompanying Issues and Decision 

Memorandum (‘‘Final Results’’). The 

period of review (‘‘POR’’) covered 

August 1, 2004, through July 31, 2005. 

We are amending our Final Results to 

correct ministerial errors made in the 

calculation of the antidumping duty 

margin for QVD Food Company 

(‘‘QVD’’), pursuant to section 751(h) of 

the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the 

‘‘Act’’). 

EFFECTIVE DATE: May 1, 2007. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Julia 

Hancock, AD/CVD Operations, Office 9, 

Import Administration, International 

Trade Administration, U.S. Department 

of Commerce, 14th Street and 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–1394. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On March 21, 2007, the Department 

published the Final Results and 

corresponding issues and decision 

memorandum. See Memorandum from 

Stephen J. Claeys, Deputy Assistant 

Secretary for Import Administration, to 

David M. Spooner, Assistant Secretary 

for Import Administration, Subject: 

Issues and Decision Memorandum for 

the Second Administrative Review of 

Certain Frozen Fish Fillets from the 

Socialist Republic of Vietnam (‘‘Final 

Decision Memo’’). 

On March 19, 2007, QVD and the 

Catfish Farmers of America and 

individual U.S. catfish processors 

(‘‘Petitioners’’) filed timely allegations 

that the Department made various 

ministerial errors in the Final Results. 

On March 26, 2007, Petitioners filed 

rebuttal comments to ministerial error 

allegations submitted by QVD. No other 

interested party submitted ministerial 

error allegations. 

Scope of Order 

The product covered by this order is 

frozen fish fillets, including regular, 

shank, and strip fillets and portions 

thereof, whether or not breaded or 

marinated, of the species Pangasius 

Bocourti, Pangasius Hypophthalmus 

(also known as Pangasius Pangasius), 

and Pangasius Micronemus. Frozen fish 

fillets are lengthwise cuts of whole fish. 

The fillet products covered by the scope 

include boneless fillets with the belly 

flap intact (‘‘regular’’ fillets), boneless 


rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with MISCELLANEOUS