alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14**  **- 1871** 

MARIA LETICIA GUZMAN PINEDA , Petitioner ,

v. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General , Respondent

.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

.

Submitted : February 10, 2015 Decided: February 20, 2015

Before WILKINSON, WYNN, and HARRIS , Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion

.

Hugo Cesar Castro , Rockville, Maryland, for Petitioner. Joyce R. Branda , Acting Assistant Attorney General , Leslie McKay, Assistant Director, Kristofer R. McDonald , Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding pre cedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Maria Leticia Guzman Pineda , a native and citizen of

El Salvador , petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) dismissing her appeal from the immigration judge’s denial of her applica tion for cancellation

of removal.

We review legal issues de novo, “affording appropriate

deference to the [Board]’s interpretation of the [Immigration and Nationality Act] and any attendant regulations.” Li Fang Lin v. Mukasey , 517 F.3d 685, 691

- 92 (4th Cir. 2008). Administrative findings of fact are conclusive unless any reasonable adjudicator would be compelled to conclude to the contrary. 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B) (2012). We defer to the Board’s factual findings under the substantial evidence rule. Anim v. Mukasey , 535 F.3d 243, 252 (4th Cir. 2008). Upon review, we agree that Pineda’s conviction for forgery of a public record was a crime involving moral turpitude, which rendered her ineligible for cancellation of removal. We therefore uphold the agency’s decision and deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In

re: Pineda (B.I.A. Aug. 7, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately3 presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIE D
Before the Third Division,

January 23, 1940

No. 43086.

#### Protest 997935-G of Henry & Co. (Los Angeles).

*376Opinion by

Evans, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of *United States*v. *Great Pacific Co.*(23 C. C. P. A. 319, T. D. 48192) the protest was sustained.
# C_2017063EN.01000602.xml

| 27.2.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 63/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.2.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 63/6

---

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 26 October 2016 — Industria de Diseño Textil, SA (Inditex) v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

(Case C-575/15 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - EU trade mark - Word mark ZARA - Transport services - Genuine use - Revocation proceedings - Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Article 51(1)(a) - Distortion of evidence - Rights of the defence))

(2017/C 063/09)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Industria de Diseño Textil, SA (Inditex) (represented by: C. Duch Fonoll, abogada)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Crespo Carillo, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings:

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

| 2. | Industria de Diseño Textil, SA (Inditex) shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Industria de Diseño Textil, SA (Inditex) shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 38, 1.2.2016.

1

---
Before the First Division,

April 28, 1944

No. 49386.

#### Petition 6166-R of De Chereny Co., Inc., et al. (Seattle).

Opinion by

Walker, ’J.

It appeared from the record in this case that a total advance of 6 percent was made, 2)4 percent of which represented a Belgian tax applicable to such goods. It was the practice, apparently, of the customs broker to submit an invoice of Belgian merchandise to the examiner or the appraiser to find out if the values were correct, but no competent evidence was offered showing that this was done, or what reply was made, if any. Appeal was taken to re-*303appraisement, at which time the importer conceded that the 2J4 percent Belgian-tax should have been added on entry, but the firm was not able to get competent-evidence from abroad with which to support its claim as to the remainder of the-advance, and the court affirmed the appraised values. The petitioner’s position seemed to be that entry was made on the basis of the price actually paid, because-the importer knew of no reason for entering at any-other value. However, the-court was of the opinion that the record disclosed nothing but a total lack on the part of those connected with and responsible for the petitioner of any knowledge as to the true value of the merchandise, without any attempt being made to seek information as to such value, and that, in the discharge of the duty before enter--ing, inquiry should' have been made by the‘entrant at every possible source of information, wherever located, to warrant the finding of good faith. On the record presented the petition was denied. *Gresham*v. *United States*(27 C. C. P. A. 106, C. A. D. 70) cited.
# C_2015146EN.01005101.xml

| 4.5.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 146/51 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.5.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 146/51

---

Action brought on 23 February 2015 — ZZ v Council

(Case F-31/15)

(2015/C 146/71)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: M. Verlardo, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Application for annulment of the applicant’s pension statement for the month of May 2014 in so far as it contains pension adjustments at the rate of 0 % for 2011 and 0,8 % for 2012, and a claim for damages for the material loss allegedly suffered.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the contested decisions and, in so far as necessary, the decisions rejecting the complaints; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the contested decisions and, in so far as necessary, the decisions rejecting the complaints;

| — | order the defendant to pay to the applicant arrears of remuneration corresponding to an adjustment of salaries and pensions at the rate of 1,7 % in 2011 and 2012, by way of damages for the financial material loss, together with interest for delayed payment at the European Central Bank rate plus 2 points, from the date of the judgment to be delivered; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay to the applicant arrears of remuneration corresponding to an adjustment of salaries and pensions at the rate of 1,7 % in 2011 and 2012, by way of damages for the financial material loss, together with interest for delayed payment at the European Central Bank rate plus 2 points, from the date of the judgment to be delivered;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

---
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.
 Date: December 8, 2009
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Arthur F. Trudel

Arthur F. TrudelSenior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and 
Secretary
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           2,127
<SECURITIES>                                     7,093
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,598
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      5,863
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                19,000
<PP&E>                                           2,765
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,604
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  21,724
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,232
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,269
<OTHER-SE>                                       8,223
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    21,724
<SALES>                                          7,422
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 7,422
<CGS>                                            1,770
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   12,065
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,434)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,434)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,434)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.50)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
# C_2017053EN.01001801.xml

| 20.2.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 53/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.2.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 53/18

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 21 December 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation — France) — Concurrence SARL v Samsung Electronics France SAS, Amazon Services Europe Sàrl

(Case C-618/15) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Judicial cooperation in civil matters - Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 - Jurisdiction - Tort, delict or quasi-delict - Selective distribution network - Prohibition on online resale outside a network - Action for an injunction prohibiting unlawful interference - Connecting factor))

(2017/C 053/21)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Referring court

Cour de cassation

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Concurrence SARL

Applicant:

Defendants: Samsung Electronics France SAS, Amazon Services Europe Sàrl

Defendants:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 5(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters must be interpreted, for the purpose of conferring the jurisdiction given by that provision to hear an action to establish liability for infringement of the prohibition on resale outside a selective distribution network resulting from offers, on websites operated in various Member States, of products covered by that network, as meaning that the place where the damage occurred is to be regarded as the territory of the Member State which protects the prohibition on resale by means of the action at issue, a territory on which the appellant alleges to have suffered a reduction in its sales.

---

(1)  OJ C 38, 1.2.2016.

1

---
| (logo)  **ncb**  National Cooperative Bank    | 2011  Crystal  Drive  Suite, 8oo  Arlington, VA 22202 |
|----------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

**FORM OF ANNUAL COMPLIANCE STATEMENT**

** **

CERTIFICATION

 

WellsFargo Commercial Mortgage Trust 2016-C33, Commercial Mortgage Pass-ThroughCertificates, Series 2016-C33 (the “Trust”)

 

I, Karyn Mann, on behalf of National Cooperative Bank,N.A., as NCB Special Servicer (the “Certifying Servicer”), certify toWells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Securities, Inc. and its officers, directorsand affiliates, and with the knowledge and intent that they will rely upon thiscertification, that:

 

1.       I (or Servicing Officers under my supervision) have reviewed the Certifying Servicer’s activitiesduring the preceding calendar year between January 1, 2018 and December 31,2018 (the “Reporting Period”) and the CertifyingServicer’s performance under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement; and

 

2.       To the best of my knowledge, basedon such review, the Certifying Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligationsunder the Pooling and Servicing Agreement in all material respects during the Reporting Period. 

 

 

Date: February 6, 2019

 

 

National Cooperative Bank, N.A., as NCB Special ServicerBy: /s/ Karyn MannName: Karyn MannTitle: Senior Vice President
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                            JUN-30-1999
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                        996246
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                       996246
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                         996246
<EQUITIES>                                    2127
<MORTGAGE>                                       0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                    0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                              998373
<CASH>                                      116864
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                           65967
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                       20268
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             1494121
<POLICY-LOSSES>                             305417
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                         238440
<POLICY-OTHER>                                   0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                            0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                              90000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                    459324
<OTHER-SE>                                  307551
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               1494121
<PREMIUMS>                                  386644
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                          34100
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                           10538
<OTHER-INCOME>                                   0
<BENEFITS>                                  288379
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                  38763
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                          9452
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              90971
<INCOME-TAX>                                 29135
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          61836
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                 61836
<EPS-BASIC>                                  .71
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .71
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                   0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                              0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                               0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                 0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                  0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                          0


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, Brian E. Schaaf, certify that:

 

1.                                     I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Ford Credit Auto Lease Trust 2016-A (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

 

2.                                     Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.                                     Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4.                                     I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

 

5.                                     All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: U.S. Bank National Association, as indenture trustee of the issuing entity, and Bank of New York Mellon, as owner trustee of the issuing entity.

 

Dated March 24, 2017

 

 
|   | /s/ Brian E. Schaaf                                |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------|
|   | Brian E. Schaaf                                    |
|   | Vice President and   Assistant Treasurer           |
|   | Ford Motor Credit Company   LLC, as Servicer       |
|   | (senior officer in   charge of servicing function) |

 

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities and Exchange Commission will hold the following meeting during the week of April 23, 2007: 

A Closed Meeting will be held on Thursday, April 26, 2007 at 2 p.m. 

Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the Closed Meeting. Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters may also be present. 

The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (7), (9)(B), and (10) and 17 CFR 200.402(a)(3), (5), (7), 9(ii) and (10), permit consideration of the scheduled matters at the Closed Meeting. 

Commissioner Atkins, as duty officer, voted to consider the items listed for the closed meeting in closed session. 

The subject matter of the Closed Meeting scheduled for Thursday, April 26, 2007 will be: 

Formal orders of investigations; 

Institution and settlement of injunctive actions; 

Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings of an enforcement nature; 

Litigation matters; and 

Other matters related to enforcement proceedings. 

At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in the scheduling of meeting items. 

For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, please contact:  The Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400. 

Dated: April 19, 2007. 

J. Lynn Taylor, 

Assistant Secretary.

 [FR Doc. E7-7835 Filed 4-24-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P
Order entered October 30 , 2018

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 18
- 00650
- CV KEVIN HINDS, Appellant

V. KELLY BETH CAIDWELL, ZACHARY ADAM ALLEN, TRINA T. WILSON AND ASSOCIATES, TRINA T. WILSON, GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEE INSURANCE

COMPANY, AND STATE B AR OF TEXAS, Appellee s On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC
- 17
- 13392



### O RDER The reporter’s record in this accelerated appeal is past due. By postcard dated June 13, 2018, we notified Vielica Dobbins, Official Court Reporter for the 134th Judicial District Court, that the reporter’s record was overdue and directed her to file the reporter’s record within ten days. By ord er dated July 30, 2018, we again notified Ms. Dobbins the reporter’s record was overdue and ordered her to, within ten days, file either (1) the reporter’s record; (2) written verification no hearings were recorded; or (3) written verification that appella nt ha d not paid for or made arrangements to pay for the reporter’s reco rd. To date, Ms. Dobbins has failed to comply with the Court’s order.Accordingly, we ORDER Vielica Dobbins to file, within TEN DAYS of the date of this

order, either (1) the report er’s record; (2) written verification no hearings were recorded; or (3) written verification that appellant ha s not paid for or made arrangements to pay for the reporter’s
record

. We notify appellant that if we receive verification he has not requested th e reporter’s record or paid for or made arrangements to pay for the reporter’s record , we will order the appeal submitted without the reporter’s record. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(c). We expressly CAUTION Ms. Dobbins that failure to comply with this order WILL result in the Court taking such action as is necessary to have Ms. Dobbins comply with the Court’s orders, including an order that she not sit as a court reporter until she complies.
We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to: Honorable Dale Tillery Presiding Judge 134th Judicial District Court
Vielica Dobbins Official Court Reporter 134th Judicial District Court All parties

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE
Exhibit 4.2



 


Consent of Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm


We have issued our report
dated April 19, 2022, with respect to the financial statement of Advisors Disciplined Trust 2108 contained in Amendment No. 2 to the Registration
Statement on Form S-6 (File No. 333-262221) and related Prospectus. We consent to the use of the aforementioned report in the Registration
Statement and Prospectus, and to the use of our name as it appears under the caption “Experts”.


 


/s/ Grant
Thornton LLP


 


Chicago, Illinois


April 19, 2022