alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2015406EN.01001501.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 7.12.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 406/15 |

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bezirksgericht Linz (Austria) lodged on 7 September 2015 — Peter Schotthöfer & Florian Steiner GbR v Eugen Adelsmayr

(Case C-473/15)

(2015/C 406/16)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bezirksgericht Linz

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Peter Schotthöfer & Florian Steiner GbR

Defendant: Eugen Adelsmayr

Question referred

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | 1. | Is the principle of non-discrimination laid down in Article 18 TFEU to be interpreted as meaning that, where a Member State has laid down a provision in its legal system, such as Article 16(2) of the Basic Law of the Federal Republic of Germany, which prohibits the extradition of German citizens to non-Member States, the prohibition also applies to citizens of other Member States residing in the Member State at issue? |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | 2. | Are Articles 19(2) and 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union to be interpreted as meaning that a Member State of the European Union must reject an application for extradition emanating from a non-Member State concerning an EU citizen residing in that Member State where the criminal proceedings from which the application for extradition arose and the decision rendered in absentia in the non-Member State did not respect the minimum standard of international law and the non-mandatory principles of the public order of the European Union (ordre public) or the right to a fair trial? |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | 3. | Lastly, is Article 50 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union or the principle of ne bis in idem secured in the case-law of the Court of Justice to be interpreted as precluding further prosecution by a non-Member State in the case of a first conviction in the non-Member State followed by the discontinuing of proceedings in a Member State of the European Union for lack of real grounds justifying prosecution? |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | 4. | In the event that one of the first three questions is answered in the affirmative, is, inter alia, Article 6 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (‘Right to liberty’) to be interpreted as meaning that an EU citizen may not be held in custody for extradition where a non-Member State makes such an application for extradition? |

---
#### Edward Boote et al. *v.*United States

No. 6750.

Entry No. 736286, etc.

Invoices dated Birmingham, England, December 13, 1945, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., January 30, *1946,*etc.

(Decided January 13, 1947)

*Benjamin A. Levett*for the plaintiffs.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant .xctorney General, for the defendant.

Keefe, Judge:

The appeals for the reappraisement listed in schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in seetipn 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importers on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
Exhibit 10.2


 





 


Dear Mr. Qingling Zhang:


 


We are very pleased that you have accepted to
join our Board of Directors as an independent director, Chairperson of the Board’s nominating and corporate governance committee,
and a member of the Board’s audit committee and the compensation committee as of April 15, 2022.


 


We have been working hard to bring seasoned and
experienced professionals to our Board of Directors, and we are excited to welcome your knowledge and experience. We feel that you will
be a great asset to our team and contribute to our plans.


 


This is to confirm our understanding that you
will receive an annual director fee of RMB 72,000 (approximately USD $11,300) in cash, payable monthly (RMB 6,000 per month) as cash compensation
for services rendered to us. You will be reimbursed for any reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with activities on
our behalf and performance of your duties.


 


Please confirm your acceptance by signing below
and we will get the appropriate paperwork in order. We will provide as much advance notice to you as possible in connection with any meetings
of the Board of Directors that we have.


 


Please feel free to call me if you have any questions.
I look forward to a successful and exciting relationship.


 





QILIAN INTERNATIONAL HOLDING GROUP LIMITED


 


	By:	/s/ Zhanchang Xin	 
	Name:	Zhanchang Xin	 
	Title:	Chief Executive Officer	 


 


	By:	/s/ Qingling Zhang	 
	Name:	Qingling Zhang
# C_2016305EN.01003601.xml

| 22.8.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 305/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.8.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 305/36

---

Order of the General Court of 24 June 2016 — Onix Asigurări v EIOPA

(Case T-590/15) (1)

1

((Action for failure to act, for annulment and for damages - Application for an inquiry to be opened into the alleged infringement of EU law - Decision of the Chair of EIOPA not to open an inquiry - Decision of the Appeals Committee to dismiss as inadmissible the complaint - Time-limits for bringing proceedings - Act not open to challenge - Infringement of essential procedural requirements - Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any legal basis))

(2016/C 305/50)

Language of the case: Romanian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Onix Asigurări SA (Bucarest, Romania) (represented by: M. Vladu, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (represented by: C. Coucke and S. Dispiter, Agents, and H.-G. Kamman, lawyer)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

First, primarily, an application based on Article 265 TFEU seeking a declaration that EIOPA illegally failed to take a decision against the incorrect application, by the Istituto per la Vigilanza sulle Assicurazioni (IVASS, the Italian supervisory authority for the insurance sector), of Article 40(6) of Council Directive 92/49/EEC of 18 June 1992 on the coordination of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to direct insurance other than life assurance and amending Directives 73/239/EEC and 88/357/EEC (third non-life insurance Directive) (OJ 1992 L 228, p. 1) and, in the alternative, an application based on Article 263 TFEU and seeking annulment of the decision EIOPA-14-267 of the Chair of EIOPA dated 6 June 2014 on the opening of an inquiry under Article 17 of Regulation (EU) No 1094/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2010 establishing a European Supervisory Authority (European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority), amending Decision No 716/2009/EC and repealing Commission Decision 2009/79/EC (OJ 2010 L 331, p. 48), and of Decision BOA 2015 001 of the Appeals Committee dated 3 August 2015, rejecting as inadmissible an appeal brought by Onix Asigurări under Article 60 of Regulation No 1094/2010 and, secondly, an application based on Article 268 TFEU and seeking compensation in respect of the harm allegedly suffered by the applicant on account of the abovementioned omission and the adoption of those decisions.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed.

| 2. | Onix Asigurări SA shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA). |
| --- | --- |

2.

Onix Asigurări SA shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA).

---

(1)  OJ C 414, 14.12.2015.

1

---
# C_2015178EN.01001001.xml

| 1.6.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 178/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.6.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 178/10

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia del País Vasco (Spain) lodged on 20 March 2015 — María Pilar Plaza Bravo v Servicio Público de Empleo Estatal. Dirección Provincial de Álava

(Case C-137/15)

(2015/C 178/11)

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunal Superior de Justicia del País Vasco

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: María Pilar Plaza Bravo

Appellant:

Respondent: Servicio Público de Empleo Estatal. Dirección Provincial de Álava

Respondent:

Question referred

Question referred

Is it contrary to Article 4(1) of Council Directive 79/7/EEC (1) of 19 December 1978 on the progressive implementation of the principle of equal treatment for men and women in matters of social security (‘the Directive’), in circumstances such as those of this case, for national legislation under which, in order for the amount of the benefit for total unemployment to be received by an employee following the loss of her only part-time employment to be calculated, a reduction coefficient for part-time work that corresponds to the percentage represented by the part-time working hours in relation to the hours completed by a comparable worker employed full-time is applied to the maximum amount [of unemployment benefit] generally laid down by law, regard being had to the fact that in that Member State the vast majority of part-time workers are women?

1

---

(1)  OJ 1979 L 6, p. 24.

1

---
EX-10.40





 EXHIBIT 10.40 

FIRST AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 

This First Amendment to Employment Agreement is made and entered into as of January 1, 2021 by and between eCombustible Products Holdings,
LLC (the “Company”) and Ramiro Guerrero (“RG”). 
 WHEREAS, the Company and RG desire to amend that
certain Employment Agreement dated December 28, 2020 by and between the Company and RG (the “Original Agreement”) with respect to the payment stream in Section 5. 

WHEREAS, the Company made an initial payment of $250,000 in connection with the referenced payment stream on November 20, 2020. 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and mutual covenants herein contained, and for other good and valuable consideration, the
parties hereto, intending to be legally bound hereby, agree as follows: 
  

	1.	 Amendment to Section 5. Section 5 of the Original Agreement is hereby amended,
effective as of January 1, 2021, by deleting the aggregated scheduled payments in their entirety and replacing them with the following: 


  

	 	•	 	 $50,000 within 60 days after the Effective Date, 



 

	 	•	 	 $50,000 within 90 days after the Effective Date, and 



 

	 	•	 	 $150,000 within 150 days after the Effective Date, 



 

	2.	 In connection with this agreement, RG waives and releases any and all claims regarding payments required to be
made to RG pursuant to Section 5 of the Original Agreement that were to occur prior to the date hereof. 


  

	3.	 General Provisions. Sections 11-17 from the Original Agreement
are incorporated herein by reference mutatis mutandis. 


 [signature page follows] 












 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company and RG have executed this First Amendment to Employment
Agreement as of the date first written above. 
  

			
	COMPANY:
	
	ECOMBUSTIBLE PRODUCTS HOLDINGS, LLC
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Jorge Arevalo

	Name:	 	 Jorge Arevalo

	Title:	 	 Chief Executive Officer

	
	RAMIRO GUERRERO
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Ramiro Guerrero
Exhibit 35.1  LOGO

CommercialMortgageServicing D1050-084, 8th Fl
401 South Tryon Street Charlotte, NC 28202
1-800-326-1334 ANNUAL
STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of April 1, 2016, by and
among CITIGROUP COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES INC, as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, C-III ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC, as Special Servicer, PARK BRIDGE LENDER SERVICES LLC, as Operating Advisor and Asset
Representations Reviewer, CITIBANK, N.A., as Certificate Administrator and WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2016-P3 (the Agreement). Capitalized
terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement. Pursuant to Section 10.08 of this
Agreement, I, Leslie Hayton, Managing Director of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:  1.
A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2018 through December 31,
2018 (the Reporting Period), and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and  2.
To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations
under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has
executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2019.  LOGO Leslie Hayton Managing
Director Wells Fargo Bank  Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.


LOGO
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------


                         CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906
                                     OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Unico American
Corporation (the "Company") for the period ended March 31, 2006, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Erwin Cheldin,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
    the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



                    /s/  Erwin Cheldin
                    ------------------
           Name:    Erwin Cheldin
           Title:   Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer
           Date:    May 12, 2006




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Unico American Corporation, and
will be retained by Unico American Corporation, and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Breswil Co., (Meadows Wye & Co., Inc.) et al. *v.*United States

No. 7414.

Invoices dated London, England, February 14, 1946, etc.

Certified March 1, 1946, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., April 5, 1946, etc.

Entry No. 750234, etc.

(Decided October 21, 1947)

*John D. Rode*for the plaintiffs.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Mollison, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importers on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
EXHIBIT 31.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
 
 Certification for Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
 
 I, Stuart Ducote, certify that:
 
 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of United Mortgage Trust;
 
 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 
 4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))) for the registrant and have:
 
 (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
 (b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the liability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
 
 (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such  evaluation; and
 
 (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
 
 5. I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors:
 
 (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 
 (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
 UNITED MORTGAGE TRUSTDate: November 15, 2010
By
/s/ Stuart DucotePresident
No. 39065.

#### Protest 926861-G of Stone & Downer Co. (Boston).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of *Baker*v. *United States*(T. D. 48987) the liver meal in question was held free of duty under paragraph 1780 as claimed.
Before the Third Division,

November 9, 1945

No. 50648.

#### Protests 38990-K/89554, etc., of Tatman, Inc., et al. (Chicago).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the court' found that the facts herein agreed upon were such as to bring the case within the holding in *John Barr*v. *United States*(11 Cust. Ct. 88, C. D. 801), which record was incorporated herein. (See *John Barr*v. *United States,*324 U. S. 83, decided February 5, 1945.) In accordance therewith it was held that the currency of the invoices should be converted at the buying rate in the New York market at noon' on the day of exportation (the “free” rate of exchange for pounds sterling), as certified by the Federal Reserve bank and set forth by the collector on each of the entries involved. The protests were sustained to-this extent:
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

PATRICK HARRIS, MERCURY AIRLINES, LLC, and

AER SPARTA CORP.

Appellants,

v.

JAMES BEVAN, 

Appellee.

No. 4D2023-0473

[July 11, 2024]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Martin J. Bidwill, Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE18-27533.

Michael Ellis and Samuel Alexander of Alexander Appellate Law, P.A., 

DeLand, for appellants.

Peter J. Solnick of Solnick Law, P.A., North Miami Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GROSS, FORST and ARTAU, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 12 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 12

  Requiring the display of the Ten Commandments in the United States 
                                Capitol.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 2007

Mr. Stearns (for himself and Mr. Westmoreland) submitted the following 
  concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on House 
                             Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
  Requiring the display of the Ten Commandments in the United States 
                                Capitol.

Whereas the Ten Commandments have had a significant impact on the development of 
        the fundamental legal principles of Western Civilization; and
Whereas the Ten Commandments set forth a code of moral conduct, observance of 
        which is widely acknowledged to promote respect for our system of laws 
        and the good of society: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),  
That Congress--
            (1) recognizes that the Ten Commandments are a declaration 
        of the fundamental principles that are the cornerstone of a 
        fair and just society; and
            (2) directs that a copy of the Ten Commandments be 
        prominently displayed in the United States Capitol at such 
        place and in such manner as the Architect of the Capitol shall 
        designate.
                                 <all>
```