alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32




Certification
Pursuant to





18
U.S.C. Section 1350,


As
Adopted Pursuant to


Section
906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002




I, Gordon
R. Arnold, certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002,
that:




i.  The
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Sierra Monitor Corporation for the quarterly
period ended June 30, 2010  fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and;




ii. The
information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Sierra Monitor Corporation
and will be retained by Sierra Monitor Corporation and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




Date:
            August 12,
      2010
            By:
            /s/ Gordon R. ArnoldGordon
      R. ArnoldChief
      Executive OfficerChief
      Financial Officer
From: Krzyzanowski, Mike [mailto:Mike.Krzyzanowski@oldcastle.com]

Sent: Friday, May 29, 2015 10:18 AM

To: Raymond, Gabrielle

Subject: RE: Glen

- Gery green brick testing results

Gabrielle,

We would like to keep the actual coordinates of the quarry locations confidential.

Thanks,

Mike

Mike Krzyzanowski | Technical Services Manager

G LEN

- G ERY C ORPORATION

433 S. Pottsville Pike

Shoemakersville PA 19555

Office: (610) 562

- 3076

Cell: (610) 207

- 6882

From: Raymond, Gabrielle [ mailto:graymond@rti.org ]

Sent: Friday, May 29, 2015 8:54 AM

To: Krzyzanowski, Mike

Subject: RE: Glen

- Gery green brick testing results

Thank your for your response. I just want to confirm with you that the file does not contain any

confidential business information?

Thanks,

Gabrielle

Gabrielle Raymond

RTI International

3040 Cornwallis Road

P.O. Box 12194

Research Triangle Park, NC 27709

Phone: (919) 541

- 7015From: Krzyzanowski, Mike [mailto:Mike.Krzyzanowski@oldcastle.com]

Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2015 4:01 PM

To: Raymond, Gabrielle

Subject: RE: Glen

- Gery green brick testing results

Gabrielle,

Attached is the worksheet for the Glen

- Gery Corporation you requested. Please note that our

plants generally use different proprietary combinations of clays, shale, and clay/shale blends

depending on the products being made. Our mined raw materials do not always come from a

single source location.

Thanks,

Mike

Mike Krzyzanowski | Technical Services Manager

G LEN

- G ERY C ORPORATION

433 S. Pottsville Pike

Shoemakersville PA 19555

Office: (610) 562

- 3076

Cell: (610) 207

- 6882

<< Glen Gery Green Brick Testing Results

- 032515BIA

- to EPA May 4 2015_GlenGery Rev

052715.xlsx >>

From: Raymond, Gabrielle <graymond@rti.org>

Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2015 10:44 AM

To: 'mike.krzyzanowski@oldcastleapg.com' < mike.krzyzanowski@oldcastleapg.com>

Subject: Glen

- Gery green brick testing results

Hello Mr. Krzyzanowski,

I work with RTI International, the contractor working with the U.S. EPA in developing air

regulations for the Brick industry, I got your name an d contact information from Susan Miller of

the BIA. The BIA has provided EPA with a spreadsheet of mercury green brick testing results

with the intent to add a mercury raw material variability factor to the Mercury MACT floor limit. In

order to incorporat e this raw material data, EPA needs to know a little bit more about the

general location of the clay deposits being used by the facilities.

I’m attaching a spreadsheet of the Glen

- Gery facilities that provided green brick testing results

to EPA via BIA. I’ve added some columns at the end to be filled out with the Name of Clay

Deposit, Geological Age of the Deposit, and Latitude/Longitude of the Clay Deposit. Any

information you are able to provide about the clay deposits will be much appreciated and

help ful!Thank you for your help,

Gabrielle

Gabrielle Raymond

RTI International

3040 Cornwallis Road

P.O. Box 12194

Research Triangle Park, NC 27709

Phone: (919) 541

- 7015

<< Green Brick Testing Results

- 032515BIA

- to EPA May 4 2015_GlenGery.xlsx >>
110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 123

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring),

3 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF USE OF CAPITOL 

4 GROUNDS FOR D.C. SPECIAL OLYMPICS LAW 

5 ENFORCEMENT TORCH RUN. 

6 On June 8, 2007, or on such other date as the Speak7 er of the House of Representatives and the Committee on 

8 Rules and Administration of the Senate may jointly des-
2

•HCON 123 EH 

1 ignate, the 2007 District of Columbia Special Olympics 

2 Law Enforcement Torch Run (in this resolution referred 

3 to as the ‘‘event’’) may be run through the Capitol 

4 Grounds as part of the journey of the Special Olympics 

5 torch to the District of Columbia Special Olympics sum6 mer games. 

7 SEC. 2. RESPONSIBILITY OF CAPITOL POLICE BOARD. 

8 The Capitol Police Board shall take such actions as 

9 may be necessary to carry out the event. 

10 SEC. 3. CONDITIONS RELATING TO PHYSICAL PREPARA11 TIONS. 

12 The Architect of the Capitol may prescribe conditions 

13 for physical preparations for the event. 

14 SEC. 4. ENFORCEMENT OF RESTRICTIONS. 

15 The Capitol Police Board shall provide for enforce16 ment of the restrictions contained in section 5104(c) of 

17 title 40, United States Code, concerning sales, advertise18 ments, displays, and solicitations on the Capitol Grounds, 
3

•HCON 123 EH 

1 as well as other restrictions applicable to the Capitol 

2 Grounds, in connection with the event. 

Passed the House of Representatives May 15, 2007. 

Attest:

Clerk. 
110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 123

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the 

forcement Torch Run.District of Columbia Special Olympics Law En-
(Reap. Dec. 9800)

#### Plywood & Door Midwest Corporation *v.*United States

Entry No. 18673.

(Decided October 6, 1960)

*James Wilson Young*for the plaintiff.

*George OoehranDoub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Mollison, Judge:

Counsel for the parties hare submitted the above-enumerated appeal for reappraisement upon stipulation, on the basis of which I find that the proper basis for the determination of the value of the involved birch plywood exported from Finland is export value, as defined in section 402(d), Tariff Act of 1930 and that such value is $99.77 per thousand square feet, net, packed.

Judgment will issue accordingly.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 625 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 625

Extending the authority for the Senate National Security Working Group.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            December 6, 2006

     Mr. Frist (for himself and Mr. Reid) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

Extending the authority for the Senate National Security Working Group.

    Resolved, That Senate Resolution 105 of the One Hundred First 
Congress, 1st session (agreed to on April 13, 1989), as amended by 
Senate Resolution 149 of the One Hundred Third Congress, 1st session 
(agreed to on October 5, 1993), as further amended by Senate Resolution 
75 of the One Hundred Sixth Congress, 1st session (agreed to on March 
25, 1999), as further amended by Senate Resolution 383 of the One 
Hundred Sixth Congress, 2d session (agreed to on October 27, 2000), as 
further amended by Senate Resolution 355 of the One Hundred Seventh 
Congress, 2d session (agreed to on November 13, 2002), and as further 
amended by Senate Resolution 480 of the One Hundred Eighth Congress, 2d 
session (agreed to November 20, 2004), is further amended in section 4 
by striking ``2006'' and inserting ``2008''.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2019305EN.01003101.xml

| 9.9.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 305/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.9.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 305/31

---

Judgment of the General Court of 12 July 2019 — Binca Seafoods v Commission

(Case T-94/15 RENV) (1)

(Production and labelling of organic products - Regulation (EC) No 834/2007 - Amendments to Regulation (EC) No 889/2008 - Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1358/2014 - Prohibition of hormones - Non-renewal of the transitional period concerning aquaculture animals provided for in Article 95(11) of Regulation No 889/2008 - Methods of reproduction - Exceptional authorisation to collect wild aquaculture juveniles for on-growing purposes - Equal treatment)

(2019/C 305/37)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Binca Seafoods GmbH (Munich, Germany) (represented by: H. Schmidt, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Lewis, G. von Rintelen and K. Walkerová, Agents)

Re:

Application on the basis of Article 263 TFEU for annulment of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1358/2014 of 18 December 2014 amending Regulation (EC) No 889/2008 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 834/2007 as regards the origin of organic aquaculture animals, aquaculture husbandry practices, feed for organic aquaculture animals and products and substances allowed for use in organic aquaculture (OJ 2014 L 365, p. 97).

Operative part of the judgment

| 1. | The action is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed.

| 2. | Binca Seafoods GmbH is ordered to pay the costs relating to the proceedings before the General Court and before the Court of Justice. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Binca Seafoods GmbH is ordered to pay the costs relating to the proceedings before the General Court and before the Court of Justice.

---

(1)  OJ C 155, 11.5.2015.

---
## IN THE COURT O F CRIMINA L A PPEA LS OF TEXA S NO. WR-25,667-03

EX P ARTE TERRY LYNN DAVIS, Applicant
ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. 23110A-422 IN THE 422ND DISTRICT COURT

F ROM K

AUF MAN C OUNTY
Per curiam . O R D E R Pursuant to the provisions of Ar t i cl e 1 1
. 07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedur e, the cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habea s corpus. Ex parte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of possession of a controlled substance and sentenc ed to imprisonment for life. The Fifth Court of Appea ls aff irmed his conviction. Davis v. State , No. 05-06-00527- CR (Tex. App.—Dallas J une 2007, no pet.)
. On Marc h 22, 2013, the trial court signe d an order designating issues. The habea s rec ord has been forwa

rded to this Court prematurely
. We rema nd this application to the 422nd District Court of Kauf man County to allow the trial judge to complete an evidentiar y inves t i g ation and enterfinding s of fa ct and c onclusions of law.

This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fac t issues. The issues shall be resolved within 90 day s o f t h i s o rd er. A supplemental transcr ipt containing all aff idavits and int err og atories or the t ransc ription of t he court repor ter’s notes from any hearing or deposition, alongwith the trial court’ s supplemental finding s of fa ct and c onclusions of law, shall be for war ded to this Court within 120 day s of t he date of t his order . Any extensions of ti me shall be obtained f

rom this Court.

Filed: Oc tober 8, 2014 Do not publish
#### Charles L. King et al. *v.*United States

No. 7413.

Invoices dated Walsall, England, July 2, 1946, etc.

Certified July 5, 1946, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., August 2, 1946, etc.

Entry Nos. 709719; 749631; AD 1402.

(Decided October 21, 1947)

*John D. Rode*for the plaintiffs.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Cline, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importers on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND INCOME STATEMENT OF UGI UTILITIES, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES AS OF AND FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN
UGI UTILITIES' QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED DECEMBER 31,
1997.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000100548
<NAME> UGI UTILITIES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           2,862
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   75,827
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,084
<INVENTORY>                                     26,843
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               111,654
<PP&E>                                         773,017
<DEPRECIATION>                                 241,632
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 708,216
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          178,712
<BONDS>                                        172,156
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           32,187
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        60,259
<OTHER-SE>                                     143,119
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   708,216
<SALES>                                        135,464
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               135,464
<CGS>                                           72,497
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   72,497
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,321
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 26,008
<INCOME-TAX>                                     9,800
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             16,208
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    16,208
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0<F1>
<FN>
<F1>There are no publicly held shares outstanding.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
(Reap. Dec. 9383)

#### Finwood Industries, Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 844159.

*593(Decided April 7, 1959)

*Siegel, Mandell & Davidson*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Mollison, Judge:

The above-entitled appeal for reappraisement relates to plywood, exported from Finland in the year 1957, and was submitted for decision upon stipulation of counsel for the parties limited to the items of merchandise which were advanced in value and appraised on the basis of the home market value.

On the agreed facts I find foreign value, as defined in section 402(c), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the said merchandise, and that such value, in each instance, was the appraised unit value, less 4 per centum, packed.

As to the items of merchandise where appraisement was made upon the basis of the entered invoice unit values, the said appeal, having been abandoned, is to that extent dismissed.

Judgment will issue accordingly.
Exhibit 10.29.2


 


SECOND AMENDMENT TO


 


THE TRAVEL & LIFESTYLE SERVICES
OPERATING AGREEMENT


 


This Second Amendment (this "Amendment"),
effective as of December 31, 2018 (the "Amendment Effective Date") by and between GBT III B.V., a private company with
limited liability organized under the laws of the Netherlands ("GBT Holdco"), and American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc.,
a corporation organized under the laws of the State of New York ("Amex") amends the Travel & Lifestyle Services Operating
Agreement, dated as of June 30, 2014, as previously amended by the First Amendment to the Travel & Lifestyle Services Operating
Agreement, effective as of January 1, 2015 (as such agreement may be further amended from time to time, the "LTOA") by
and between GBT Holdco and Amex. Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the respective meanings set forth in the Agreement.


 


WHEREAS, the Parties desire to amend the LOTA to
extend the Expiration Date in accordance with Section 8.02 of the LTOA as set forth below.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual
agreements set forth herein, and intending to be legally bound, the parties hereto agree as follows:


 


1.            Extension.
The definition of "Expiration Date" in Section 1.01 of the LTOA is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as follows:


 


"Expiration Date" means the date five
(5) years and three (3) months from the Effective Date, unless amended or extended pursuant to the terms hereof.


 


2.            Miscellaneous.
Except as specifically stated in this Amendment, the Agreement remains in full force and effect and is not modified or amended hereby
and no rights or remedies thereunder are waived hereby. This Amendment may be executed in one or more counterparts, and by the Parties
in separate counterparts, each of which, when executed, shall be deemed to be an original, but all of which taken together shall constitute
one and the same agreement. Electronic delivery of an executed counterpart of a signature page to this Amendment shall be effective
as delivery of a manually executed counterpart of this Amendment.


 


[Remainder of page intentionally left blank]


 






     



     


    

 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, GBT Holdco and Amex have caused
this Amendment to be executed and delivered as of the date and year first set forth above.


 


	 	GBT III B.V., a Netherlands private company with limited liability
	 	 
	 	By:	               /s/ Freek Jansen
	 	 	Name:  Freek Jansen
	 	 	Title:     Authorised Signatory
	 	 
	 	AMERICAN EXPRESS TRAVEL RELATED SERVICES COMPANY, INC., a New York corporation
	 	 
	 	By:	                /s/Timothy Creber
	 	 	Name:  Timothy Creber
	 	 	Title:      VP American Express




 


Signature
Page to Second Amendment to the Travel & Lifestyle Services Operating Agreement
----

|   | **EXHIBIT                31.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY                ACT** |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                          |                                                                      |                                           |
|-----------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------|
|                                          | **UNITED                  MORTGAGE TRUST**                                |
|                                     |                                                                 |                                      |
| Date: November                  14, 2007 | By                                                              | /s/ Christine                  A. Griffin |
|                                          | *President                  and Chief Executive                  Officer* |

----
Connecticut Department of



## ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION February 24, 2012 Stephen Perkins, Director Office ofEcosystem

Protection United States Environmental Protection Agency Region 1 5Post Office Square, Suite 100 Boston, MA02109-3912 Re: Regional Haze State Implementation Plan Dear Mr . Perkins: I write in response to your letter of February 15, 2012 to Commissioner Esty concerning your approval of Connecticut's Regional Haze State Implementation Plan (Regional Haze SIP) . I understand that you plan to propose action on Connecticut's Regional Haze SIP by March 15, 2012. Connecticut's Regional Haze SIP relies on ozone season emission limits implemented through the Clean AirInterstate Rule (CAIR) ozone season nitrogen oxides (NOx) trading program . While CAIR is in place for summer 2012, I understand that Connecticut will in future years likely need anew regulation to make enforceable the continuedthe ozone season NOx reduction of the CAIRprogram . We have proposed Regulations of Connecticut State Agencies (RCSA) section 22a-174-22d to serve the purpose of maintainingthe ozone season reductions ofthe CAIR program . Forthe purposes of hasteningthe approval of RCSAsection 22a-174-22d, I request that you parallel process . the approval of RCSAsection

, 22a-174-22d, for which a public hearing was held on December 15, 2011 . We are moving RCSA section 22a-174-22d towards adoption and requesting that our reviewing agencies work with haste. Our goal is to have a final adopted regulation by June, 2012. However, I cannot make the commitment you requestto complete the adoption by adate certain as the approval process is not under the control of the Department of Energy and Environmental Protection. I trust this request for parallel processing and reiteration of our intent to move forward will enable you to approve Connecticut's Regional Haze SIP . Please call me ifyou have any questions.

Sincerely, (~fCw ~ue. Anne Gobin, Chief Bureau ofAir Management cc: Peter Babich. Wendy Jacobs 79 ElmStreet " Hartford, CT 06106-5127 www .ct .gov/deep Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity Employer.