alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. Geological SurveyMiscellaneous Field Studies Map MF 2324Version 1.3Bathymetry of the Republic of the Marshall Islands and Vicinity*By* James R. Hein, Florence L. Wong, *and* Dan L. Mosier1999 (rev. 2007)
*Detail from Bathymetric Map of the Republic of the Marshall Islands and Vicinity. Kwajalein Atoll is one of the largest coral atolls in the world and surrounds one of the largest lagoons in the world.*
Introduction
The bathymetric map of the Republic of the Marshall Islands and vicinity is bounded by a window of latitude 3 to 17 degrees North, longitude 153 to 175 degrees East. The map was compiled from surveys conducted by the USGS, Korean Ocean Research and Development Institute, and published gridded data. In addition to national jurisdictions, island and atoll coastlines are indicated on the map.
Files available for downloadDescriptionMetadataDownloadPDF version of this map (requires Adobe Acrobat Reader 4.0 or higher). User is cautioned that bathymetric artifacts have been observed in this map. mf2324v1.1.pdf (2.4 MB) PostScript version of this map. mf2324_v1.1_s1.ps(10.3 MB)0.01-degree gridded bathymetry data as ASCII formatted file (import with ArcGIS asciigrid command) and metadata.txthtmlfaqmarshallsg.zip (12 MB)bathymetry data as xyz values extracted from 0.01-degree gridreadmemarshallsxyz.zip (14 MB)200-m contours in shapefile format with metadatatxthtmlfaqmarshallsc.zip (2.6 MB) 
Version history

For information about the scientific content of this report, contact James Hein

Download  a free copy of Adobe Reader 

This report is available via print on demand.

| Help| PDF help || Publications main page| Miscellaneous Field Studies Maps || Department of the Interior| U.S. Geological Survey || Geologic Division| Western Coastal and Marine Geology || Privacy Statement| Disclaimer| Accessibility |

The URL for this page is:https://pubs.usgs.gov/mf/1999/2324/Please send comments and suggestions, or report problems, to:Michael DigglesCreated: September 14, 1999 (cad)Updated: April 24, 2007 (bwr, mfd)
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 124 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.Con.Res.124
                                                   Agreed to May 8, 2007

                       One Hundred Tenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday,
            the fourth day of January, two thousand and seven

                          Concurrent Resolution

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. USE OF CAPITOL GROUNDS FOR NATIONAL PEACE OFFICERS' MEMORIAL 
              SERVICE.

    (a) In General.--The Grand Lodge of the Fraternal Order of Police 
and its auxiliary (in this resolution referred to as the ``sponsor'') 
shall be permitted to sponsor a public event, the 26th annual National 
Peace Officers' Memorial Service (in this resolution referred to as the 
``event''), on the Capitol Grounds, in order to honor the law 
enforcement officers who died in the line of duty during 2006.
    (b) Date of Event.--The event shall be held on May 15, 2007, or on 
such other date as the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the 
Committee on Rules and Administration of the Senate jointly designate.

SEC. 2. TERMS AND CONDITIONS.

    (a) In General.--Under conditions to be prescribed by the Architect 
of the Capitol and the Capitol Police Board, the event shall be--
        (1) free of admission charge and open to the public; and
        (2) arranged not to interfere with the needs of Congress.
    (b) Expenses and Liabilities.--The sponsor shall assume full 
responsibility for all expenses and liabilities incident to all 
activities associated with the event.

SEC. 3. EVENT PREPARATIONS.

    Subject to the approval of the Architect of the Capitol, the 
sponsor is authorized to erect upon the Capitol Grounds such stage, 
sound amplification devices, and other related structures and 
equipment, as may be required for the event.

SEC. 4. ENFORCEMENT OF RESTRICTIONS.

    The Capitol Police Board shall provide for enforcement of the 
restrictions contained in section 5104(c) of title 40, United States 
Code, concerning sales, advertisements, displays, and solicitations on 
the Capitol Grounds, as well as other restrictions applicable to the 
Capitol Grounds, in connection with the event.
Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.
```
No. 39057.

#### Protest 926569-G of Miss Belle Williams (Baltimore).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

There was nothing in the record to support the claim made. The protest was therefore overruled.
# C_2016419EN.01004301.xml

| 14.11.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 419/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.11.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 419/43

---

Judgment of the General Court of 28 September 2016 — Kozmetika Afrodita v EUIPO — Núñez Martín and Machado Montesinos (KOZMeTIKA AFRODITA)

(Case T-574/15) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative mark KOZMeTIKA AFRODITA - Earlier national word mark EXOTIC AFRODITA MYSTIC MUSK OIL and earlier national figurative mark AFRODITA MYSTIC MUSK OIL - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2016/C 419/56)

Language of the case: Slovenian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Kozmetika Afrodita d.o.o. (Rogaška Slatina, Slovenia) (represented by: B. Grešak, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Rajh, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Pedro Núñez Martín (Madrid, Spain) and Carmen Guillermina Machado Montesinos (Madrid)

Other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 28 July 2015 (case R 2577/2014-4) relating to opposition proceedings between, on the one hand, Mr Núñez Martín and Ms Machado Montesinos and, on the other, Kozmetika Afrodita.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Kozmetika Afrodita d.o.o. to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Kozmetika Afrodita d.o.o. to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 406, 7.12.2015.

1

---
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 198 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 23, 2008 

Received and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and 

Pensions 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of Congress that the United States 

has a moral responsibility to meet the needs of those 

persons, groups and communities that are impoverished, 

disadvantaged or otherwise in poverty. 

Whereas poverty can be seen as a deep, structural problem 

that implicates our value system and our educational and 

economic institutions; 

Whereas poverty may be defined as the lack of basic necessities of life such as food, shelter, clothing, health care, 

education, security, and opportunity; 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
2 

HCON 198 RFS 

Whereas policy initiatives addressing poverty have not kept 

pace with the needs of millions of Americans; 

Whereas many experts believe that the lack of an equitable 

distribution of housing choices across the country leads 

to isolation and concentrated poverty; 

Whereas the number of Americans living in poverty has risen 

by over 5,000,000 since 2000; 

Whereas there were 37 million Americans living in poverty in 

2005; 

Whereas the official poverty rate in 2005 was 12.6 percent; 

Whereas 24.9 percent of African Americans, 21.8 percent of 

Hispanics, 25.3 percent of Native Americans, 10.9 percent of Asian Americans, and 8.3 percent of Whites lived 

in poverty in the United States in 2005; 

Whereas in 2005 a family of 4 was considered poor under the 

U.S. Census Bureau’s official measure if the family’s income was below $19,971; 

Whereas the poverty rate for children 18 years and younger 

(17.6 percent) remained higher than that of 18–24 yearolds (11.1 percent) and that of people 65 and older (10.1 

percent) in 2005; and 

Whereas the number in poverty increased for people 65 and 

older by almost 400,000 since 2000: Now, therefore, be 

it 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that the 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
3 

HCON 198 RFS 

1 United States should set a national goal of cutting poverty 

2 in half over the next 10 years. 

Passed the House of Representatives January 22, 

2008. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
# C_2015081EN.01001101.xml

| 9.3.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 81/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.3.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 81/11

---

Appeal brought on 19 January 2015 by the European Commission against the judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) delivered on 7 November 2014 in Case T-399/11 Banco Santander and Santusa v Commission

(Case C-21/15 P)

(2015/C 081/14)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Appellant: European Commission (represented by: R. Lyal, B. Stromsky, C. Urraca Caviedes and P. Němečková, acting as Agents)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: Banco Santander, S.A. and Santusa Holding, S.L.

Other party to the proceedings:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The Commission claims that the Court should:

| — | set aside the judgment under appeal; |
| --- | --- |

—

set aside the judgment under appeal;

| — | refer the case back to the General Court of the European Union; and |
| --- | --- |

—

refer the case back to the General Court of the European Union; and

| — | reserve the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

reserve the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The General Court erred in law by incorrectly interpreting Article 107(1) TFEU and, in particular, the concept of selectivity of State aid contained in that article.

That single ground of appeal consists of two parts, which derive from the aforementioned error of law:

| — | in the first place, the General Court erred by requiring, in order to demonstrate that a measure is selective, the identification of a category of undertakings with specific and inherent characteristics (identifiable ex ante); and |
| --- | --- |

—

in the first place, the General Court erred by requiring, in order to demonstrate that a measure is selective, the identification of a category of undertakings with specific and inherent characteristics (identifiable ex ante); and

ex ante

| — | in the second place, the General Court incorrectly interpreted the concept of selectivity by making an artificial distinction between aid to the export of goods and aid to the export of capital. |
| --- | --- |

—

in the second place, the General Court incorrectly interpreted the concept of selectivity by making an artificial distinction between aid to the export of goods and aid to the export of capital.

---
January 8, 1941

No. 45192.

#### Protests 106492-G, etc., of Amrein Freudenberg Co., Inc., et al.

Abstract 44889. Plaintiffs’ application for rehearing granted.
No. 40375.

#### Protest 957926-G of Sprouse-Reitz Co. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Sullivan, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of paper bells similar to those the subject of *Kresge*v. *United States*(25 C. C. P. A. 1, T. D. 48975). The claim at 45 percent under paragraph 397 was therefore sustained.
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





TWL
      CORPORATION





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Trinity Learning Corporation (the
      "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
      Patrick R Quinn, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:





3.
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
                and





4.
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.








Date:  May
      24,
      2007





/*s/
                Patrick R. Quinn*Patrick
                R QuinnChief
                Financial Officer





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      TWL Corporation and will be retained by it and furnished to the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 8 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 8

 Expressing the sense of the Senate regarding the maximum amount of a 
                          Federal Pell Grant.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 24, 2005

Ms. Collins (for herself, Mr. Feingold, and Mr. Coleman) submitted the 
 following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Health, 
                     Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing the sense of the Senate regarding the maximum amount of a 
                          Federal Pell Grant.

Whereas public investment in higher education yields a return of several dollars 
        for each dollar invested;
Whereas higher education promotes economic opportunity and recipients of 
        bachelor's degrees earn 73 percent more in lifetime earnings than those 
        with only a secondary school diploma and are also significantly less 
        likely to be unemployed;
Whereas access to a college education has become a hallmark of American society, 
        and is vital to upholding our belief in equality of opportunity;
Whereas for a generation, the Federal Pell Grant has served as an established 
        and effective means of providing access to higher education;
Whereas when viewed in constant dollars, the value of today's Pell Grant maximum 
        award has actually declined by 16 percent since the mid 1970s;
Whereas grant aid as a portion of student aid has fallen significantly in the 
        past 30 years;
Whereas in 1975, grant aid constituted approximately 80 percent of total student 
        aid awarded to college students and loans constituted only 17 percent, 
        now this has reversed with grants making up only 38 percent, and loans 
        covering 56 percent of total student aid; and
Whereas the increasing reliance on borrowing to finance a higher education is 
        particularly burdensome on low-income families and has negative 
        consequences for the enrollment of these students.
Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that--
            (1) the maximum Federal Pell Grant for which a student 
        should be eligible during award year 2005-2006 should be 
        $4,500; and
            (2) the authorized levels for the Federal Pell Grant 
        maximum amount found in section 401 of the Higher Education Act 
        of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1070a) should be set high enough to 
        accommodate a Federal Pell Grant amount of $9,000 by award year 
        2010-2011.
                                 <all>
```
#### F. A. MacCluer, Inc. *v.*United States

No. 7431.

Invoice dated Loughborough, England, December 9, 1941.

Certified December 12, 1941.

Entered at New York, N. Y., February 26, 1942.

Entry No. 740002.

(Decided November 3, 1947)

*Strauss & Hedges (Hadley S. King*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Bao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Kinchedoe, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
# C_2017014EN.01001101.xml

| 16.1.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 14/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.1.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 14/11

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 10 November 2016 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de commerce de Paris, Conseil d’État — France) — Eco-Emballages SA v Sphère France SAS and Others (C-313/15), Melitta France SAS and Others v Ministre de l’Écologie, du Développement durable et de l’Énergie (C-530/15)

(Joined Cases C-313/15 and C-530/15) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Environment - Directive 94/62/EC - Article 3 - Packaging and packaging waste - Definition - Rolls, tubes and cylinders around which flexible material is wound (‘Roll cores’) - Directive 2013/2/EU - Validity - Amendment by the European Commission of the list of examples of packaging set out in Annex I to Directive 94/62/EC - Misinterpretation of the term ‘packaging’ - Misuse of implementing powers))

(2017/C 014/14)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Tribunal de commerce de Paris, Conseil d’État

Parties to the main proceedings

(Case C-313/15)

Applicant: Eco-Emballages SA

Defendants: Sphère France SAS, Carrefour Import SAS, SCA Tissue France SAS, Melitta France SAS, SCA Hygiène Products SAS, Wepa France SAS, formerly Wepa Troyes SAS, Industrie Cartarie Tronchetti SpA, Industrie Cartarie Tronchetti Ibérica SL, Cofresco Frischhalteprodukte GmbH & Co. KG, Kimberly-Clark SAS, Gopack SAS, Délipapier SAS, Scamark SAS, CMC France SARL, Schweitzer SAS, Paul Hartmann SA, Wepa France SAS, formerly Wepa Lille SAS, Système U Centrale Nationale SA, Industrie Cartarie Tronchetti France SAS

Interveners: Group’Hygiène syndicat professionnel (C-313/15),

(Case C-350/15)

Applicants: Melitta France SAS, Cofresco Frischhalteprodukte GmbH & Co. KG, Délipapier SAS, Gopack SAS, Industrie Cartarie Tronchetti SpA, Industrie Cartarie Tronchetti Ibérica SL, Kimberly-Clark SAS, Wepa France SAS, formerly Lucart France, Paul Hartmann SA, SCA Hygiène Products SAS, SCA Tissue France SAS, Group’Hygiène syndicat professionnel

Defendant: Ministre de l’Écologie, du Développement durable et de l'Énergie

Intervener: Industrie Cartarie Tronchetti France SAS (C-530/15)

Operative part of the judgment

Article 3(1) of Directive 94/62/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 December 1994 on packaging and packaging waste, as amended by Directive 2004/12/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004, must be interpreted as meaning that roll cores in the form of rolls, tubes or cylinders, around which flexible material is wound and sold to consumers, constitute ‘packaging’ within the meaning of that provision.

---

(1)  
  OJ C 294, 7.9.2015.

OJ C 414, 14.12.2015.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
Company's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 30, 1997 and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                          JAN-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                               APR-30-1997
<CASH>                                                       1,379,492
<SECURITIES>                                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                5,140,432
<ALLOWANCES>                                                   170,263
<INVENTORY>                                                  3,971,553
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                            11,185,314
<PP&E>                                                       7,063,266
<DEPRECIATION>                                               8,731,227
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                              21,478,597
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                        4,106,929
<BONDS>                                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                0
<PREFERRED>                                                          0
<COMMON>                                                       429,386
<OTHER-SE>                                                  12,830,728
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                21,478,597
<SALES>                                                      9,257,334
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                             9,257,334
<CGS>                                                        5,924,676
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                8,632,952
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                               113,964
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                             113,964
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                510,418
<INCOME-TAX>                                                   205,100
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                            305,318
<DISCONTINUED>                                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                      0
<CHANGES>                                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                                   305,318
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                      .07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                      .07
        

</TABLE>