alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                EXHIBIT 10.48

                    FIRST AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


     This First Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated as of January 27, 2000,
is by and between FirstWorld Communications, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
"Company"), and Paul C. Adams ("Executive") (collectively, the "Parties").


                                    Recitals

     A.  The Parties have previously entered into a written Employment
Agreement, dated as of January 21, 1999 (the "Agreement").

     B.  The period of employment of Executive by the Company under the
Agreement commenced on January 27, 1999, and continued through January 27, 2000.

     C.  The Parties mutually desire to extend the period of employment of
Executive by the Company for a period of one (1) year through January 27, 2001,
under the same terms and conditions as contained in the Agreement.


                                   Agreement

     In consideration of the foregoing, the mutual covenants contained herein
and other good and valuable consideration, the sufficiency of which is hereby
acknowledged, the Parties hereby agree to amend the Agreement as follows:

     1.  The first sentence of Section 2 of the Agreement is deleted in its
         entirety and replaced with the following:

                The period of employment of Executive by the Company
                hereunder (the "Employment Period") shall commence on
                January 28, 2000 (the "Commencement Date") and shall
                continue through January 27, 2001 (the "Expiration Date").

     2.  Section 4(a) of the Agreement - delete "$120,000" and replace with
         "$132,000".

     3.  Except as expressly modified herein, the Agreement shall remain in full
         force and effect in accordance with its terms and conditions.


<PAGE>

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this Agreement, as
amended, as of the date and year first above written.


                                FirstWorld Communications, Inc.



                                By: /s/ Sheldon S. Ohringer
                                    -----------------------
                                    Sheldon S. Ohringer,
                                    President and Chief Executive Officer


                                Paul C. Adams



                                /s/ Paul C. Adams
                                -----------------
Before the Second Division,

November 14, 1945

No. 50652.

#### Protest 118442-K of F. Blumenthal & Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

The record showed that certain items of the merchandise consist of hats similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 47291. Upon the established facts and following the authority cited the merchandise in question was held dutiable as claimed.
III 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 590 

Designating the second Sunday in December 2006, as ‘‘National Children’s 

Memorial Day’’ in conjunction with The Compassionate Friends Worldwide Candle Lighting. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 28, 2006 

Mr. VITTER submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Designating the second Sunday in December 2006, as ‘‘National Children’s Memorial Day’’ in conjunction with The 

Compassionate Friends Worldwide Candle Lighting. 

Whereas approximately 200,000 infants, children, teenagers, 

and young adults of families living throughout the United 

States die each year from a myriad of causes; 

Whereas stillbirth, miscarriage, and the death of an infant, 

child, teenager, or young adult are considered some of 

the greatest tragedies that a parent or family could ever 

endure; 

Whereas a supportive environment, empathy, and understanding are considered critical factors in the healing 

process of a family that is coping with and recovering 

from the loss of a loved one; 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 590 IS 

Whereas the mission of The Compassionate Friends is to assist families working towards the positive resolution of 

grief following the death of a child of any age and to provide information to help others be supportive; and 

Whereas the work of local chapters of The Compassionate 

Friends provides a caring environment in which bereaved 

parents, grandparents, and siblings can work through 

their grief with the help of others: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates the second Sunday in December 

3 2006, as ‘‘National Children’s Memorial Day’’ in 

4 conjunction with The Compassionate Friends World5 wide Candle Lighting; 

6 (2) supports the efforts of The Compassionate 

7 Friends to assist and comfort families grieving the 

8 loss of a child; and 

9 (3) calls upon the people of the United States 

10 to observe National Children’s Memorial Day with 

11 appropriate ceremonies and activities in remem12 brance of the many infants, children, teenagers, and 

13 young adults of families in the United States who 

14 have died. 

Æ 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
No. 48093.

#### Protest 94696-K of Galmor Watch Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

From examination of the papers the court was unable to find anything sufficient to overcome the presumption of correctness attaching to the collector’s action. The protest was therefore overruled.
No. 65724.

#### American Commercial, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 60/21468, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

It was stipulated that the facts and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *Browne Vintners Co., Inc.*(34 C.C.P.A. 112, C.A.D. 351), and that the quantities reported by the inspector as manifested, not found, were not in fact received by the importer. In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the decision cited, it was held that duty is not assessable upon the quantities of merchandise reported by the inspector as manifested, not found. The protests were sustained to this extent.
**EXHIBIT32.1**

**Union Carbide Corporation andSubsidiaries**

**Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

I, Patrick E. Gottschalk,President and Chief Executive Officer of Union Carbide Corporation (the “Corporation”),certify that:

1.               the QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q of the Corporation for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”) fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and

2.               the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.

 

 
| /s/ PATRICK E. GOTTSCHALK             |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|
| Patrick E. Gottschalk                 |   |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |   |
| July 30, 2007                         |   |

 

24

----
p.1 

OAR Box 1384 

Prepped by Charmelle Mathews 

Document Number: 

47) ll-E-7 

Docket Number: 

A-94-52 

Printed 7/2/2008 8:42:04 AM Sheet 47 of 264 
P.2 

CONTACT REPORT FORM 

PES PROJECT NO. N204 

Company Contact Phone 

Weatherly, Inc. Magnus Danielson (404) 873-5030 

Description 

Weatherly markets the Polyad adsorption control system in the U.S. Mr. 

Danielson said that one system is installed to control styrene in Denmark, two 

or three in Germany, and one in Sweden. The only test information available is 

the 1993 testing at Eljer in Wilson, NC. A second generation, preconcentratortype system (which would work in conjunction with an incinerator) is under 

development in Sweden, and the company plans to increase its marketing effort in 

the U.S. Test results are expected soon from Europe, and Mr. Danielson will send 

them. 

', 

:>-l t /il.'T 

( 

""^t-f .
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

CANON INC., CANON U.S.A., INC., CANON 

VIRGINIA, INC.,

Appellants

v.

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION,

Appellee

ASTER GRAPHICS, INC., JIANGXI YIBO E-TECH 

COMPANY LIMITED, ASTER GRAPHICS 

COMPANY, LTD., NINESTAR CORPORATION, 

NINESTAR IMAGE TECH LIMITED, NINESTAR 

TECHNOLOGY COMPANY, LTD., STATIC 

CONTROL COMPONENTS, INC., PRINT-RITE N.A., 

INC., UNION TECHNOLOGY INTERNATIONAL 

(M.C.O.) CO. LTD., PRINT-RITE UNICORN IMAGE 

PRODUCTS CO. LTD.,

Intervenors

______________________

2019-1950

______________________

Appeal from the United States International Trade 

Commission in Investigation No. 337-TA-1106.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

Case: 19-1950 Document: 86 Page: 1 Filed: 04/20/2020
MICHAEL P. SANDONATO, Venable LLP, New York, NY, 

argued for appellants. Also represented by SETH 

BOESHORE, DENNIS MCMAHON, ANDREW KUTAS; EDMUND 

JOHN HAUGHEY, III, Washington, DC. 

 CLINT A. GERDINE, Office of the General Counsel, 

United States International Trade Commission, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by DOMINIC 

L. BIANCHI, WAYNE W. HERRINGTON, SIDNEY A.

ROSENZWEIG. 

 NICOLE A. SAHARSKY, Mayer Brown LLP, Washington, 

DC, argued for all intervenors. Intervenors Ninestar Corporation, Ninestar Image Tech Limited, Ninestar Technology Company, Ltd., Static Control Components, Inc. also 

represented by GARY HNATH, BRYAN NESE, MINH NGUYENDANG; LEI MEI, EDWARD NAIDICH, Mei & Mark LLP, Washington, DC.

 BARBARA A. MURPHY, Foster, Murphy, Altman & 

Nickel, PC, Washington, DC, for intervenors Aster 

Graphics, Inc., Jiangxi Yibo E-Tech Company Limited, Aster Graphics Company, Ltd. Also represented by SUSAN 

KOEGEL. 

 STEVEN EUGENE ADKINS, McGuireWoods LLP, Washington, DC, for intervenors Print-Rite N.A., Inc., Union 

Technology International (M.C.O.) Co. Ltd., Print-Rite 

Unicorn Image Products Co. Ltd. Also represented by 

BENJAMIN C. HSING, New York, NY. 

 ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Case: 19-1950 Document: 86 Page: 2 Filed: 04/20/2020
 PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, O’MALLEY, and TARANTO, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT 

April 20, 2020 

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Case: 19-1950 Document: 86 Page: 3 Filed: 04/20/2020
(Reap. Dec. 9000)

Entry No. 807880.

#### Davies Turner & Co. *v.*United States

(Decided October 4, 1957)

*John D. Bode*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Lawrence, Judge:

The proper dutiable value of certain compass thermometers imported from England, covered by the above-enumerated appeal for a reappraisement, is before the court for determination.

The parties hereto have stipulated and agreed that, at the time of exportation of the involved merchandise, there was no foreign, export, or United States value; that cost of production is the proper basis of appraisement; and that the cost of production of said compass thermometers is £0.3.9.

*667Upon the agreed facts of record, I find and hold that cost of production, as that value is defined in section 402 (f) the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. § 1402 (f)), is the proper basis of value for the compass thermometers in issue and that said value is £0.3.9.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
September 21, 1967

No. 19,818.

#### United States v James E. Swift, S/SGT, U. S. Air Force (ACM 19048).

(J. FERGUSON would grant in accordance with his dissenting opinion in United States v Swift, 17 USCMA 227, 38 CMR 25.)
EXHIBIT 99.1



            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                          AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
              SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Trinity Companies, Inc. (the "Company")
Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2002 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Douglas D. Cole, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Date:  February 26, 2003                /s/ DOUGLAS D. COLE
                                            ----------------------------
                                            Douglas D. Cole
                                            Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
The  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information   extracted  from  the
registrant's  financial  statements  as of and for the six  month  period  ended
September  27,  1997,  and is  qualified  in its  entirety by  reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-28-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-27-1997
<CASH>                                         1,255,651
<SECURITIES>                                   1,272,342
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    2,813,055
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               5,641,878
<PP&E>                                         3,989,457
<DEPRECIATION>                                 2,633,060
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 7,247,364
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          3,490,228
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       153,175
<OTHER-SE>                                     2,357,101
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   7,247,364
<SALES>                                        7,932,863
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               7,932,863
<CGS>                                          4,901,010
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  4,901,010
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               3,828,499
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (89,392)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (867,431)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (831,339)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (831,339)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.07)
        


</TABLE>
**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| 1.   | The              Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)              of              the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | Information              contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,              the              financial condition and results of operations of the              Company. |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                  |                                                                        |                                    |
|----------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------|
|                        |                                                                   |                               |
| Date:              June 12, 2007 | By:                                                               | /s/ Rainer              Bosselmann |
|                             | Rainer              Bosselmann                                              |
|                             | Chairman              of the Board and Chief Executive              Officer |
# C_2015429EN.01002601.xml

| 21.12.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 429/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.12.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 429/26

---

Order of the General Court of 16 October 2015 — Laboratorios Ern v OHIM — Dermogen Farma (ETERN JUVENTUS)

(Case T-60/15) (1)

1

((Community Trade Mark - Opposition proceedings - Restriction of the services applied for - no need to adjudicate))

(2015/C 429/33)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Laboratorios Ern, SA, (Barcelona, Spain) (represented by: T. González Martínez, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. García Murillo and A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as agents)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Dermogen Farma, SA (Madrid, Spain)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 6 November 2014 (case R 2414/2013-1) relating to opposition proceedings between Laboratorios Ern, SA and Dermogen Farma, SA.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

| 2. | The parties shall bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The parties shall bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 107, 30.3.2015.

1

---
# C_2017022EN.01002602.xml

| 23.1.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 22/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.1.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 22/26

---

Judgment of the General Court of 29 November 2016 — Pi-Design v EUIPO — Société des produits Nestlé (PRESSO)

(Case T-545/15) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - International registration - Application for territorial extension of the protection - Word mark PRESSO - Earlier national word mark PRESSO - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2017/C 022/34)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Pi-Design AG (Triengen, Switzerland) (represented by: M. Apelt, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Fischer, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Société des produits Nestlé SA (Vevey, Switzerland)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 2 July 2015 (Case R 428/2014-1), relating to opposition proceedings between the Société des produits Nestlé and Pi-Design.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Pi-Design AG to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Pi-Design AG to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 371, 9.11.2015.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM UNION
CARBIDE CORPORATION'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 1997, AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000100790
<NAME> UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                             115
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     1079
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        544
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  1923
<PP&E>                                            7424
<DEPRECIATION>                                    3855
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    6770
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             1131
<BONDS>                                           1467
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              140
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           155
<OTHER-SE>                                        2053
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      6770
<SALES>                                           3304
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  3304
<CGS>                                             2451
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     2451
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   250<F1>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  38
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    500
<INCOME-TAX>                                       145
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                348
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       348
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.54
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.31
<FN>
<F1>OTHER EXPENSES ARE EQUAL TO RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT OF 81 AND DEPRECIATION
AND AMORTIZATION OF 169.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
**Certification of the Chief Executive OfficerPursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)**

               I, Glenn F. Tilton, the Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officerof United Air Lines, Inc. (the "Company") certify that to the best of myknowledge, based upon a review of the quarterly report on Form 10-Q forthe period ended September 30, 2005 of the Company (the "Report"):(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operationsof the Company.  /s/ Glenn F. Tilton__________Glenn F. TiltonUnited Air Lines, Inc.Chairman, President and Chief Executive OfficerNovember 14, 2005