Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 81 / Friday April 27, 2007 / Rules and Regulations 20935 

general applicability and affects only 

the applicant which applied to the FAA 

for approval of these design features on 

the airplane. 

The substance of the special 

conditions for these airplanes has been 

subjected to the notice and comment 

procedure in several prior instances and 

has been derived without substantive 

change from those previously issued. 

Because a delay would significantly 

affect the certification of the airplane, 

which is imminent, the FAA has 

determined that prior public notice and 

comment are unnecessary and 

impracticable, and good cause exists for 

adopting these special conditions 

immediately. The FAA is requesting 

comments to allow interested people to 

submit views that may not have been 

submitted in response to the prior 

opportunities for comment. 

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 25 

Aircraft, Aviation safety, Reporting 

and recordkeeping requirements. 

The authority citation for these 

special conditions is as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701, 

44702, 44704. 

The Special Conditions 

Accordingly, pursuant to the 

authority delegated to me by the 

Administrator, the following special 

conditions are issued as part of the 

supplemental type certification basis for 

the Dassault Falcon Fan Jet, Fan Jet 

Series D, Series E, Series F, MystereFalcon 20–C5, 20–D5, 20–E5, 20–F5, 

and Mystere-Falcon 200 airplanes 

modified by 3S Certification, LLC. 

1. Protection From Unwanted Effects 

of High-Intensity Radiated Fields 

(HIRF). 

Each electrical and electronic system 

that performs critical functions must be 

designed and installed to ensure that the 

operation and operational capability of 

these systems to perform critical 

functions are not adversely affected 

when the airplane is exposed to highintensity radiated fields. 

2. For the purpose of these special 

conditions, the following definition 

applies: Critical Functions: Functions 

whose failure would contribute to or 

cause a failure condition that would 

prevent continued safe flight and 

landing of the airplane. 

Issued in Renton, Washington, on April 20, 

2007. 

Ali Bahrami, 

Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, 

Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. E7–8112 Filed 4–26–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION 

20 CFR Part 401 

[Docket No. SSA 2006–0074] 

RIN 0960–AE88 

Privacy and Disclosure of Official 

Records and Information 

AGENCY: Social Security Administration. 

ACTION: Final rules. 

SUMMARY: These final rules revise our 

privacy and disclosure rules to clarify 

certain provisions and to provide 

expanded regulatory support for new 

and existing responsibilities and 

functions. These changes in the 

regulations will increase Agency 

efficiency and ensure consistency in the 

implementation of the Social Security 

Administration’s (SSA) policies and 

responsibilities under the Privacy Act 

and the Social Security Act. 

DATES: These rules are effective May 29, 

2007. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Christine W. Johnson, Office of Public 

Disclosure, 3–A–6 Operations Building, 

6401 Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 

21235–6401, (410) 965–8563 or TTY 

(410) 965–5609. For information on 

eligibility or filing for benefits, call our 

national toll-free numbers, 1–800–772–

1213 or TTY 1–800–325–0778, or visit 

our Internet Web site, Social Security 

Online, at http:// 

www.socialsecurity.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Electronic Version 

The electronic file of this document is 

available on the date of publication in 

the Federal Register at http:// 

www.gpoaccess.gov/FR/index.html. 

Background 

We last revised the privacy and 

disclosure regulations in 1980 when the 

Social Security Administration (SSA) 

was a part of the Department of Health 

and Human Services (DHHS) (formerly 

the Department of Health, Education 

and Welfare) and subject to DHHS’

disclosure policy oversight. Since 1980, 

significant changes have occurred in the 

procedures. We are codifying these 

changes in the procedures governing 

access to, and disclosure of, personally 

identifiable information. We are also 

making minor housekeeping changes to 

further clarify our procedures. In 

general, these final rules reflect SSA’s 

compliance with technological, legal 

and legislative changes that have 

occurred since 1980. 

We are clarifying the provisions 

regarding requests for access to 

information developed by medical 

sources for Social Security programs, 

fully describing the existing 

responsibilities and functions of the 

Privacy Officer position, establishing 

the new senior agency official for 

privacy as required by the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) and 

explaining the related responsibilities, 

and implementing SSA’s new Privacy 

Impact Assessment process in 

accordance with the E-Government Act 

of 2002, Pub. L. 107–347. As required by 

OMB, we are requiring adequate 

safeguards against inappropriate 

disclosure of personal information by 

electronic means, e.g., over the Internet, 

and revising our procedures on 

notification of, or access to, medical 

records on behalf of another person, e.g., 

an adult or child. 

These final rules also clarify SSA 

policy concerning an individual’s access 

to, or notification of, program records, 

amend the language concerning appeal 

requests under the Privacy Act to 

include denial of access to the record, 

and amend the language to insert the 

word ‘‘written’’ prior to ‘‘consent’’ to 

clarify that the requirement means 

disclosure with written consent and 

expands the language to more clearly 

define what information we will 

disclose with written consent. We are 

revising the language to show that SSA 

also has physical custody of personnel 

records, and revising the language under 

disclosure of personal information in 

nonprogram records to show the new 

name of the former General Accounting 

Office. 

These final rules amend the language 

under disclosure of personal 

information in program records to make 

clear that we disclose information from 

program records only when there is a 

legitimate need for the information, and 

revise the language under disclosures 

required by law to show the current 

name for Aid to Families with 

Dependent Children. We are amending 

the language under compatible purposes 

to clearly state how we implement the 

routine use provision of the Privacy Act 

(5 U.S.C. 552a(b)(3)) and what we mean 

by routine use in terms of the 

information we can disclose, and 

amending the language under law 

enforcement purposes to clarify that 

disclosures under 5 U.S.C. 552a(b)(7) 

also require a written request. We are 

amending the language under statistical 

and research activities to reflect the 

language in the new routine use of data 

for research purposes, amending the 

language in the General Accounting 

Office section to correctly reflect the 

new name of the agency, and clarifying 

certain matters related to our rules on 


cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with RULES
20936 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 81 / Friday April 27, 2007 / Rules and Regulations 

disclosure under court order and other 

legal process. 

Comments on the Notice of Proposed 

Rulemaking 

We published the Notice of Proposed 

Rulemaking (NPRM) in the Federal 

Register on September 13, 2006 (71 FR 

at 53994). The 60-day comment period 

ended on November 13, 2006. We 

received no public comments on the 

proposed rule. Accordingly, we are 

adopting the proposed rules as final 

rules. However, we made one 

substantive change to proposed 

§ 401.180, which we discuss below in 

connection with the explanation of how 

these final rules change the current 

rules. We also made a few minor 

revisions to the text of the proposed 

rules for clarity. The changes are all 

non-substantive. 

Explanation of Changes 

Section 401.20 Scope 

We are amending the section heading 

in § 401.20(a) to read ‘‘Access’’ and 

amending paragraph (a) to clarify the 

rules regarding the access provision as 

it pertains to information developed by 

medical sources that perform 

consultative examinations for us. We are 

amending the heading in 

§ 401.20(b)(1)(iii) to read ‘‘Records kept 

by medical sources,’’ and amending the 

language in that paragraph. 

Section 401.30 Privacy Act and Other 

Responsibilities 

We are adding new paragraphs (d), (e) 

and (f) to § 401.30. 

Privacy Officer 

New paragraph § 401.30(d) fully 

describes the position of the SSA 

Privacy Officer and the responsibilities 

and functions of that position. SSA has 

always had a designated Privacy Officer 

since the enactment of the Privacy Act 

in 1974. Since that time, the Privacy 

Officer has overall responsibility for 

coordination of SSA privacy matters 

within the Agency. As such, the Privacy 

Officer advises the Agency on privacy 

policy matters and is responsible for 

developing and implementing privacy 

policies and related requirements, 

ensures compliance with the Privacy 

Act, and provides general oversight of 

privacy and disclosure policy involving 

privacy and disclosure matters. The 

Privacy Officer has other 

responsibilities including evaluating 

legislative proposals and other 

initiatives proposed by Congress, other 

agencies and the public, and reviewing 

multifunctional projects, studies and 

research activities involving personal 

information. The responsibilities also 

include facilitating the incorporation of 

privacy principles into information 

technology systems architectures and 

technical designs to ensure that privacy 

policies and practices are properly 

reflected in our business requirements. 

We are providing an explanation of 

the Privacy Officer’s responsibilities to 

emphasize SSA’s long-standing 

commitment to the public that personal 

information maintained in SSA’s 

Privacy Act systems of records is 

handled in full compliance with the 

law. 

Senior Agency Official for Privacy 

To help protect the privacy rights of 

Americans and to ensure that agencies 

continue to have effective information 

privacy management programs in place 

to carry out this important 

responsibility, OMB requires that each 

agency designate a senior agency official 

to serve as the person in charge of 

privacy issues. 

The Senior Agency Official for 

Privacy will have overall responsibility 

and accountability for privacy issues at 

the national and agency-wide levels. 

The official will also have a central role 

in overseeing agency compliance efforts 

in privacy policy procedures as well as 

a key role in policy-making as it 

pertains to the development and 

evaluation of legislative, regulatory and 

other policy proposals that might 

implicate privacy issues. 

New paragraph § 401.30(e) establishes 

SSA’s Senior Agency Official for 

Privacy and fully describe the 

responsibilities of that position as 

prescribed by OMB. (See OMB 

Memorandum M–08–05, dated February 

11, 2005). 

Privacy Impact Assessments 

In accordance with Section 208 of the 

E–Government Act of 2002 (Pub. L. 

107–347, 44 U.S.C. 3501 note), the 

Office of Management and Budget now 

requires that certain Information 

Technology (IT) projects receive a 

special privacy review called a Privacy 

Impact Assessment (PIA). The PIA 

review is in addition to the current SSA 

requirement that SSA’s Privacy Officer 

certify Agency procurement requests for 

automated data processing resources 

and proposed contracts. The PIA review 

will strengthen the existing process by 

incorporating privacy involvement 

directly into the development of the IT 

system lifecycle and establishing a 

process that the entire Agency can 

understand in terms of privacy 

involvement in IT system development 

efforts. 

New paragraph § 401.30(f) describes 

the PIA requirements for ensuring that 

privacy considerations receive a 

standardized review. We will determine 

if adequate measures have been taken to 

protect the privacy of the personally 

identifiable information the IT project 

will affect and if the requirements of the 

Privacy Act and applicable SSA 

regulations and policy are properly 

addressed. 

Section 401.45 Verifying Your Identity 

We are adding to § 401.45 new 

paragraphs (b)(3) and (b)(4) to 

emphasize that when SSA provides 

convenient service to you over open 

computer networks such as the Internet, 

we will adequately protect against 

improper disclosure of records. We are 

redesignating present paragraphs (b)(3), 

(b)(4) and (b)(5) as (b)(5), (b)(6) and 

(b)(7), respectively. We are also revising 

the language in redesignated (b)(5). 

Increasingly, computer technology 

enables us to transact business with you 

as a taxpayer, Social Security 

beneficiary, employer or third-party 

organization. We are moving cautiously 

to allow you to communicate with us 

securely over open networks such as the 

Internet. Such expanded services are 

dependent on our development of 

practices and mechanisms to ensure 

identity confirmation to protect you 

against improper disclosure of the 

personal information we maintain in 

our records, and to improve privacy 

protections. 

Section 401.55 Special Procedures for 

Notification of or Access to Medical 

Records 

We are revising the section heading to 

read ‘‘Access to medical records.’’ We 

are revising the procedures for access to 

medical records to conform to the 

practices and systems of records that set 

out special procedures under which 

individuals may have direct access to 

their medical records. 

Currently, when you request your 

medical records, § 401.55(b)(1)(ii) 

requires you to designate a 

representative to receive the records for 

you and gives the representative the 

discretion to inform you about the 

contents of your record. We are 

modifying the special procedures in that 

paragraph to require the representative 

to release your record to you after the 

discussion of its contents. The 

representative no longer has the 

discretion to withhold any part of your 

record. 

Section 401.55(c)(2)(iii) currently 

gives a designated representative (e.g., 

family physician or other health care 

professional) discretion about making 

the contents of a minor’s medical record 

available to the parent or legal guardian. 


cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 81 / Friday April 27, 2007 / Rules and Regulations 20937 

These final rules modify this provision 

to require the representative to release 

the minor’s records to the parent or legal 

guardian following the discussion of its 

contents. Additionally, we are 

redesignating present paragraph (d) 

concerning requests on behalf of 

incapacitated adults as paragraph (c)(3). 

Section 401.60 Access or Notification 

of Program Records About Two or More 

Individuals 

Currently, § 401.60 is entitled ‘‘Access 

or notification of program records about 

two or more individuals.’’ The first 

sentence in the section reads ‘‘When 

information about two or more 

individuals is in one record filed under 

your social security number, you may 

receive the information about you and 

the fact of entitlement and the amount 

of benefits payable to other persons 

based on your record.’’ We are 

amending § 401.60 by inserting the 

word ‘‘to’’ after the word ‘‘Access’’ in 

the heading and revising the language in 

both the heading and first sentence to 

read ‘‘about more than one individual.’’

Section 401.70 Appeals of Refusals To 

Correct or Amend Records 

Currently, § 401.70 is entitled 

‘‘Appeals of refusals to correct or amend 

records.’’ We are amending the section 

heading to include appeals after denial 

of access. We are clarifying the policy in 

the section by revising the language in 

existing paragraphs (a), (b) and (c). We 

are adding a new paragraph (d) to 

clearly explain the process after you file 

your appeal. 

Section 401.100 Disclosure of Records 

With the Consent of the Subject of the 

Record 

We are amending the language in the 

section heading under § 401.100 to 

insert the word ‘‘written’’ before 

‘‘consent.’’ We are revising the language 

in paragraph (a) to clarify that the 

consent must be in writing and define 

what information we will disclose with 

written consent. To present the 

information in a more reader-friendly 

format, the second and third sentences 

of paragraph (a) are designated as new 

paragraphs (b) ‘‘Disclosure with written 

consent’’, and (c) ‘‘Disclosure of the 

entire record,’’ respectively. We are 

making conforming changes to existing 

paragraph (b) and redesignating it as 

paragraph (d). 

Section 401.105 Disclosure of Personal 

Information Without the Consent of the 

Subject of the Record 

We are revising the second sentence 

of paragraph (b) into two sentences to 

clarify that SSA also has physical 

custody of personnel records 

maintained as part of the Office of 

Personnel Management’s (OPM) Privacy 

Act government-wide systems of records 

and that these records are subject to 

OPM’s rules on access and disclosure at 

5 CFR parts 293 and 297. 

Section 401.110 Disclosure of Personal 

Information in Nonprogram Records 

Without the Consent of the Subject of 

the Record 

We are amending the language in 

§ 401.110(j) to show the new name for 

the former General Accounting Office. 

Section 401.115 Disclosure of Personal 

Information in Program Records 

Without the Consent of the Subject of 

the Record 

We are amending the introductory 

language in § 401.115 to make clear that 

the information in program records will 

be disclosed only on a need-to-know 

basis. 

Section 401.120 Disclosure Required 

by Law 

Currently, the last sentence in 

§ 401.120 reads ‘‘* * * and to Federal, 

State and local agencies administering 

Aid to Families with Dependent 

Children, Medicaid, unemployment 

compensation, food stamps, and other 

programs.’’ We are amending the 

language to reflect the current name of 

the AFDC program. The new name will 

read ‘‘* * * Temporary Assistance for 

Needy Families * * *’’

Section 401.150 Compatible Purposes 

We are amending § 401.150 to clearly 

state how we implement the routine use 

provision. More specifically, the 

language in paragraphs (a) and (b) is 

expanded to include what we mean by 

‘‘routine use’’ in terms of the 

information we can disclose and how 

we give notice of routine use 

disclosures, respectively. We are 

amending paragraph (c) by adding new 

paragraphs (c)(1) and (c)(2) to clearly 

show the distinctions between 

disclosure in SSA programs and 

programs similar to SSA programs, for 

compatibility purposes. 

Section 401.155 Law Enforcement 

Purposes 

We are amending § 401.155 to make 

clear that the Privacy Act requires a 

written request for information from the 

head of the law enforcement agency in 

situations involving both serious crimes 

and criminal activity involving Social 

Security programs or other programs 

with the same purpose. 

Section 401.165 Statistical and 

Research Activities 

We are amending § 401.165 to make it 

consistent with the recently published 

new routine use of data for research 

purposes. 

Section 401.175 General Accounting 

Office 

We are amending the section heading 

in § 401.175 to reflect a name change. 

The new heading will read 

‘‘Government Accountability Office.’’

We are also revising the language in the 

paragraph to read ‘‘* * * to the 

Government Accountability Office when 

that agency needs the information to 

carry out its duties.’’

Section 401.180 Courts 

We are revising the entire section of 

§ 401.180 to clarify our policy on 

disclosure when we receive an order 

from a court of competent jurisdiction. 

In 1980, when § 401.180 was initially 

published as a final rule, the status of 

subpoenas and other legal process under 

paragraph (b)(11) of the statute was 

unclear. Since then, SSA has not treated 

a subpoena or similar legal process as a 

court order unless a judge signs it. We 

believe that this position is now 

established as law as it is consistent 

with court decisions and OMB guidance 

interpreting the Privacy Act. See, e.g., 

Doe v. DiGenova, 779 F.2d 74 (D.C. Cir. 

1985); Stiles v. Atlanta Gas Light Co., 

453 F.Supp. 798 (N.D. Ga. 1978). 

The Privacy Act (5 U.S.C. 552a(b)(11)) 

permits disclosure by an agency 

pursuant to the order of a court of 

competent jurisdiction. Under this 

provision, we consider only a Federal 

court of the United States to be a court 

of competent jurisdiction. However, the 

proposed rules provided that we may 

disclose information in compliance with 

a state court order if the disclosure was 

necessary to preserve the rights of an 

accused to due process in a criminal 

proceeding (71 FR at 54000). This 

provision of the proposed rules could 

have been misconstrued to be 

inconsistent with the Privacy Act and 

proposed (and final) § 401.180(d). Final 

§ 401.180(d) states our view that, under 

the Privacy Act, the Federal 

Government has not waived its 

sovereign immunity, which would 

preclude state court jurisdiction over a 

Federal agency or official. Since a state 

court does not have jurisdiction over a 

Federal agency or official in the absence 

of a waiver of the Federal Government’s 

sovereign immunity, we have deleted 

the exception for certain state court 

orders set out in proposed § 401.180(g). 

The final rules are consistent with our 

position that state court orders do not 


cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with RULES
20938 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 81 / Friday April 27, 2007 / Rules and Regulations 

provide an independent basis for 

disclosure. Consequently, under the 

final rules, we may disclose information 

in response to a state court order only 

if another provision of this part permits 

disclosure (such as law enforcement or 

consent). If we find an independent 

basis for disclosure, we may honor the 

request for information sought in the 

state court order under the authority of 

the other provision. As a result, in these 

final rules, we revised the second 

sentence of proposed § 401.180(d) to 

state that ‘‘* * * state court orders will 

be treated in accordance with other 

provisions of this part.’’

We also amended the language as 

appropriate to make clear that, for 

purposes of this section, a court is a 

judicial branch of the Federal 

government. In a conforming change, we 

redesignated proposed § 401.180(h) as 

final § 401.180(g). 

In paragraph 401.180(a) we make 

clear that when information disclosed 

from SSA records is used in court 

proceedings, it usually becomes part of 

the public record of the proceedings and 

its confidentiality often cannot be 

protected. Accordingly, we will follow 

the rules in new paragraph (d) of this 

section in deciding whether an order is 

from a court of competent jurisdiction. 

We are changing the heading in 

paragraph (b) to read ‘‘Court’’ and 

amending the language in the paragraph 

to state SSA’s position that a court, for 

purposes of 5 U.S.C. 552a(b)(11), is an 

institution of a judicial branch of the 

Federal government consisting of one or 

more judges who seek to adjudicate 

disputes and administer justice. The 

definition clarifies that other entities in 

other branches of the Federal 

government or not in the United States 

are not courts for purposes of the 

Privacy Act. 

We are adding a new paragraph (c) to 

explain that only a legal process, such 

as a summons or warrant, that is signed 

by a judge and that commands the 

disclosure of information by SSA will 

be considered to be a court order for 

purposes of the statutory exception in 5 

U.S.C. 552a(b)(11). References to 

subpoenas have been removed from this 

regulation. 

When we receive legal process that is 

not an order of a court of competent 

jurisdiction, (such as a grand jury 

subpoena, a subpoena signed by the 

clerk of the court or the attorney 

representing a party to the proceeding), 

we may decide to disclose information 

if the conditions described in any other 

provision of this regulation would 

permit the disclosure (for example, for 

a compatible purpose under § 401.150). 

However, we will not disclose without 

an order from a court of competent 

jurisdiction if the Privacy Act or any 

other law would prohibit the disclosure 

without such an order. We are adding a 

new paragraph (d) to explain our view 

on court of competent jurisdiction. 

In new paragraph (e) of this section 

we describe the conditions for 

disclosure under court order and clarify 

the rules on disclosure when a court 

order is involved. 

We are adding a new paragraph (f) to 

explain that in other circumstances we 

may attempt to satisfy the needs of a 

court of competent jurisdiction when 

the circumstances in paragraph (e) are 

not met. We will make these 

determinations in accordance with 

401.140. 

We are removing existing paragraph 

(g) and redesignating paragraph (h) as 

paragraph (g). New paragraph (g) 

provides a cross-reference to additional 

regulations contained in 20 CFR part 

403 concerning testimony and 

production of records in legal 

proceedings. 

Regulatory Procedures 

Executive Order 12866 

The Office of Management and Budget 

has reviewed these final rules in 

accordance with Executive Order 12866, 

as amended by Executive Order 13258. 

Regulatory Flexibility Act 

We certify that these final rules would 

not have a significant economic impact 

on a substantial number of small entities 

because they affect only individuals or 

entities acting on their behalf. Thus, a 

regulatory flexibility analysis as 

provided in the Regulatory Flexibility 

Act, as amended, is not required. 

Paperwork Reduction Act 

These final rules contain reporting 

requirements as shown in the table 

below. Where the public reporting 

burden is accounted for in Information 

Collection Requests for the various 

forms that the public uses to submit the 

information to SSA, a 1-hour 

placeholder burden is being assigned to 

the specific reporting requirement(s) 

contained in these rules. 

Section 

Annual 

number of 

responses 

Frequency of 

response 

Average 

burden per 

response 

(min.) 

Estimated 

annual burden 

(hours) 

401.45(b) .......................................................................................................... 20,000 1 10 3333 

401.70(a)(b) ..................................................................................................... ........................ ........................ ........................ 1 

401.100(b) ........................................................................................................ ........................ ........................ ........................ 1 

Total .......................................................................................................... 20,000 1 10 3335

An Information Collection Request 

has been submitted to OMB for 

clearance. To receive a copy of the OMB 

clearance package, you may call the 

SSA Reports Clearance Officer on 410–

965–0454. 

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance 

Program Nos. 96.001 Social Security—

Disability Insurance; 96.002 Social 

Security—Retirement Insurance; 96.004 

Social Security—Survivors Insurance; 96.006 

Supplemental Security Income). 

List of Subjects in 20 CFR Part 401 

Information, Records, Administrative 

practice and procedure, Archives and 

records. 

Dated: January 17, 2007. 

Jo Anne B. Barnhart, 

Commissioner of Social Security. 

Editorial Note: This document was 

received at the Office of the Federal Register 

on April 20, 2007. 

■ For the reasons set out in the 

preamble, we are amending subparts A, 

B and C of part 401 of chapter III of title 

20 of the Code of Federal Regulations as 

set forth below: 

PART 401—PRIVACY AND 

DISCLOSURE OF OFFICIAL RECORDS 

AND INFORMATION 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 401 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: Secs. 205, 702(a)(5), 1106, and 

1141 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 

405, 902(a)(5), 1306, and 1320b–11); 5 U.S.C. 

552 and 552a; 8 U.S.C. 1360; 26 U.S.C. 6103; 

30 U.S.C. 923. 


cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 81 / Friday April 27, 2007 / Rules and Regulations 20939 

■ 2. Section 401.20 is amended by 

revising paragraphs (a) and (b)(1)(iii) to 

read as follows: 

§ 401.20 Scope. 

(a) Access. Sections 401.30 through 

401.95, which set out SSA’s rules for 

implementing the Privacy Act, apply to 

records retrieved by an individual’s 

name or personal identifier subject to 

the Privacy Act. The rules in §§ 401.30 

through 401.95 also apply to 

information developed by medical 

sources for the Social Security program 

and shall not be accessed except as 

permitted by this part. 

(b) * * * 

(1) * * * 

(iii) Information retained by medical 

sources pertaining to a consultative 

examination performed for the Social 

Security program shall not be disclosed 

except as permitted by this part. 

* * * * * 

■ 3. Section 401.30 is amended by 

revising the heading and adding 

paragraphs (d), (e) and (f) to read as 

follows: 

§ 401.30 Privacy Act and other 

responsibilities. 

* * * * * 

(d) Privacy Officer. The Privacy 

Officer is an advisor to the Agency on 

all privacy policy and disclosure 

matters. The Privacy Officer coordinates 

the development and implementation of 

Agency privacy policies and related 

legal requirements to ensure Privacy Act 

compliance, and monitors the 

coordination, collection, maintenance, 

use and disclosure of personal 

information. The Privacy Officer also 

ensures the integration of privacy 

principles into information technology 

systems architecture and technical 

designs, and generally provides to 

Agency officials policy guidance and 

directives in carrying out the privacy 

and disclosure policy. 

(e) Senior Agency Official for Privacy. 

The Senior Agency Official for Privacy 

assumes overall responsibility and 

accountability for ensuring the agency’s 

implementation of information privacy 

protections as well as agency 

compliance with federal laws, 

regulations, and policies relating to the 

privacy of information, such as the 

Privacy Act. The compliance efforts also 

include reviewing information privacy 

procedures to ensure that they are 

comprehensive and up-to-date and, 

where additional or revised procedures 

may be called for, working with the 

relevant agency offices in the 

consideration, adoption, and 

implementation of such procedures. The 

official also ensures that agency 

employees and contractors receive 

appropriate training and education 

programs regarding the information 

privacy laws, regulations, polices and 

procedures governing the agency’s 

handling of personal information. In 

addition to the compliance role, the 

official has a central policy-making role 

in the agency’s development and 

evaluation of legislative, regulatory and 

other policy proposals which might 

implicate information privacy issues, 

including those relating to the 

collection, use, sharing, and disclosure 

of personal information. 

(f) Privacy Impact Assessment. In our 

comprehensive Privacy Impact 

Assessment (PIA) review process, we 

incorporate the tenets of privacy law, 

SSA privacy regulations, and privacy 

policy directly into the development of 

certain Information Technology 

projects. Our review examines the risks 

and ramifications of collecting, 

maintaining and disseminating 

information in identifiable form in an 

electronic information system and 

identifies and evaluates protections and 

alternate processes to reduce the risk of 

unauthorized disclosures. As we 

accomplish the PIA review, we ask 

systems personnel and program 

personnel to resolve questions on data 

needs and data protection prior to the 

development of the electronic system. 

■ 4. Section 401.45 is amended by 

redesignating paragraphs (b)(3), (b)(4) 

and (b)(5) as (b)(5), (b)(6) and (b)(7), 

respectively, adding new paragraphs 

(b)(3) and (b)(4) and revising 

redesignated paragraph (b)(5) to read as 

follows: 

§ 401.45 Verifying your identity. 

* * * * * 

(b) * * * 

(3) Electronic requests. If you make a 

request by computer or other electronic 

means, e.g., over the Internet, we require 

you to verify your identity by using 

identity confirmation procedures that 

are commensurate with the sensitivity 

of the information that you are 

requesting. If we cannot confirm your 

identity using our identity confirmation 

procedures, we will not process the 

electronic request. When you cannot 

verify your identity through our 

procedures, we will require you to 

submit your request in writing. 

(4) Electronic disclosures. When we 

collect or provide personally 

identifiable information over open 

networks such as the Internet, we use 

encryption in all of our automated 

online transaction systems to protect the 

confidentiality of the information. When 

we provide an online access option, 

such as a standard e-mail comment form 

on our Web site, and encryption is not 

being used, we alert you that personally 

identifiable information (such as your 

social security number) should not be 

included in your message. 

(5) Requests not made in person. 

Except as provided in paragraphs (b)(2) 

of this section, if you do not make a 

request in person, you must submit a 

written request to SSA to verify your 

identify or you must certify in your 

request that you are the individual you 

claim to be. You must also sign a 

statement that you understand that the 

knowing and willful request for or 

acquisition of a record pertaining to an 

individual under false pretenses is a 

criminal offense. 

* * * * * 

■ 5. Section 401.55 is amended by 

revising the heading and paragraphs (a), 

(b)(1)(ii), (c)(1) and (c)(2)(iii) and by 

redesignating paragraph (d) as 

paragraph (c)(3) to read as follows: 

§ 401.55 Access to medical records. 

(a) General. You have a right to access 

your medical records, including any 

psychological information that we 

maintain. 

(b) * * * 

(1) * * * 

(ii) When you request medical 

information about yourself, you must 

also name a representative in writing. 

The representative may be a physician, 

other health professional, or other 

responsible individual who will be 

willing to review the record and inform 

you of its contents. Following the 

discussion, you are entitled to your 

records. The representative does not 

have the discretion to withhold any part 

of your record. If you do not designate 

a representative, we may decline to 

release the requested information. In 

some cases, it may be possible to release 

medical information directly to you 

rather than to your representative. 

* * * * * 

(c) Medical records of minors. 

(1) Request by the minor. You may 

request access to your own medical 

records in accordance with paragraph 

(b) of this section. 

(2) Request on a minor’s behalf. * * * 

(iii) Where a medical record on the 

minor exists, we will in all cases send 

it to the physician or health professional 

designated by the parent or guardian. 

The representative will review the 

record, discuss its contents with the 

parent or legal guardian, then release 

the entire record to the parent or legal 

guardian. The representative does not 

have the discretion to withhold any part 

of the minor’s record. We will respond 

in the following similar manner to the 


cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with RULES
20940 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 81 / Friday April 27, 2007 / Rules and Regulations 

parent or guardian making the request: 

‘‘We have completed processing your 

request for notification of or access to 

lllll’s (Name of minor) medical 

records. Please be informed that if any 

medical record was found pertaining to 

that individual, it has been sent to your 

designated physician or health 

professional.’’

* * * * * 

■ 6. Section 401.60 is amended by 

revising the section heading and first 

sentence of the paragraph to read as 

follows: 

§ 401.60 Access to or notification of 

program records about more than one 

individual. 

When information about more than 

one individual is in one record filed 

under your social security number, you 

may receive the information about you 

and the fact of entitlement and the 

amount of benefits payable to other 

persons based on your record. * * * 

■ 7. Section 401.70 is revised to read as 

follows: 

§ 401.70 Appeals of refusals to correct 

records or refusals to allow access to 

records. 

(a) General. This section describes 

how to appeal decisions made by SSA 

under the Privacy Act concerning your 

request for correction of or access to 

your records, those of your minor child, 

or those of a person for whom you are 

the legal guardian. We generally handle 

a denial of your request for information 

about another person under the 

provisions of the Freedom of 

Information Act (see part 402 of this 

chapter). To appeal a decision under 

this section, your request must be in 

writing. 

(b) Appeal of refusal to correct or 

amend records. If we deny your request 

to correct an SSA record, you may 

request a review of that decision. As 

discussed in § 401.65(e), our letter 

denying your request will tell you to 

whom to write. 

(1) We will review your request 

within 30 working days from the date of 

the receipt. However, for a good reason 

and with the approval of the Executive 

Director for the Office of Public 

Disclosure, this time limit may be 

extended up to an additional 30 days. In 

that case, we will notify you about the 

delay, the reason for it and the date 

when the review is expected to be 

completed. 

(2) If, after review, we determine that 

the record should be corrected, we will 

do so. However, if we refuse to amend 

the record as you requested, we will 

inform you that—

(i) Your request has been refused and 

the reason for refusing; 

(ii) The refusal is SSA’s final decision; 

and 

(iii) You have a right to seek court 

review of SSA’s final decision. 

(3) We will also inform you that you 

have a right to file a statement of 

disagreement with the decision. Your 

statement should include the reason you 

disagree. We will make your statement 

available to anyone to whom the record 

is subsequently disclosed, together with 

a statement of our reasons for refusing 

to amend the record. Also, we will 

provide a copy of your statement to 

individuals whom we are aware 

received the record previously. 

(c) Appeals after denial of access. If, 

under the Privacy Act, we deny your 

request for access to your own record, 

those of your minor child or those of a 

person to whom you are the legal 

guardian, we will advise you in writing 

of the reason for that denial, the name 

and title or position of the person 

responsible for the decision and your 

right to appeal that decision. You may 

appeal the denial decision to the 

Executive Director for the Office of 

Public Disclosure, 6401 Security 

Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21235–6401, 

within 30 days after you receive notice 

denying all or part of your request, or, 

if later, within 30 days after you receive 

materials sent to you in partial 

compliance with your request. 

(d) Filing your appeal. If you file an 

appeal, the Executive Director or his or 

her designee will review your request 

and any supporting information 

submitted and then send you a notice 

explaining the decision on your appeal. 

The time limit for making our decision 

after we receive your appeal is 30 

working days. The Executive Director or 

his or her designee may extend this time 

limit up to 30 additional working days 

if one of the circumstances in 20 CFR 

402.140 is met. We will notify you in 

writing of any extension, the reason for 

the extension and the date by which we 

will decide your appeal. The notice of 

the decision on your appeal will explain 

your right to have the matter reviewed 

in a Federal district court if you disagree 

with all or part of our decision. 

■ 8. Section 401.100 is revised to read 

as follows: 

§ 401.100 Disclosure of records with the 

written consent of the subject of the record. 

(a) General. Except as permitted by 

the Privacy Act and the regulations in 

this part, or when required by the FOIA, 

we will not disclose your records 

without your written consent. 

(b) Disclosure with written consent. 

The written consent must clearly 

specify to whom the information may be 

disclosed, the information you want us 

to disclose (e.g., social security number, 

date and place of birth, monthly Social 

Security benefit amount, date of 

entitlement), and, where applicable, 

during which timeframe the information 

may be disclosed (e.g., during the school 

year, while the subject individual is out 

of the country, whenever the subject 

individual is receiving specific 

services). 

(c) Disclosure of the entire record. We 

will not disclose your entire record. For 

example, we will not honor a blanket 

consent for all information in a system 

of records or any other record consisting 

of a variety of data elements. We will 

disclose only the information you 

specify in the consent. We will verify 

your identity and where applicable (e.g., 

where you consent to disclosure of a 

record to a specific individual), the 

identity of the individual to whom the 

record is to be disclosed. 

(d) A parent or guardian of a minor is 

not authorized to give written consent to 

a disclosure of a minor’s medical record. 

See § 401.55(c)(2) for the procedures for 

disclosure of or access to medical 

records of minors. 

■ 9. Section 401.105 is amended by 

revising the second sentence of 

paragraph (b) to read as follows: 

§ 401.105 Disclosure of personal 

information without the consent of the 

subject of the record. 

* * * * * 

(b) * * * For administrative and 

personnel records, the Privacy Act 

applies. To the extent that SSA has 

physical custody of personnel records 

maintained as part of the Office of 

Personnel Management’s (OPM) Privacy 

Act government-wide systems of 

records, these records are subject to 

OPM’s rules on access and disclosure at 

5 CFR parts 293 and 297. * * * 

■ 10. Paragraph (j) of § 401.110 is 

revised to read as follows: 

§ 401.110 Disclosure of personal 

information in nonprogram records without 

the consent of the subject of the record. 

* * * * * 

(j) To the Comptroller General, or any 

of his authorized representatives, in the 

course of the performance of duties of 

the Government Accountability Office. 

* * * * * 

■ 11. Section 401.115 is amended by 

revising the introductory text to read as 

follows: 


cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 81 / Friday April 27, 2007 / Rules and Regulations 20941 

§ 401.115 Disclosure of personal 

information in program records without the 

consent of the subject of the record. 

This section describes how various 

laws control the disclosure of personal 

information that we keep. We disclose 

information in the program records only 

when a legitimate need exists. For 

example, we disclose information to 

officers and employees of SSA who 

have a need for the record in the 

performance of their duties. We also 

must consider the laws identified below 

in the respective order when we 

disclose program information: 

* * * * * 

■ 12. Section 401.120 is amended by 

revising the last sentence in the 

paragraph to read as follows: 

§ 401.120 Disclosures required by law. 

* * * These agencies include the 

Department of Veterans Affairs for its 

benefit programs, U.S. Citizenship and 

Immigration Services to carry out its 

duties regarding aliens, the Railroad 

Retirement Board for its benefit 

programs, and to Federal, State and 

local agencies administering Temporary 

Assistance for Needy Families, 

Medicaid, unemployment 

compensation, food stamps, and other 

programs. 

■ 13. Section 401.150 is revised to read 

as follows: 

§ 401.150 Compatible purposes. 

(a) General. The Privacy Act allows us 

to disclose information maintained in a 

system of records without your consent 

to any other party if such disclosure is 

pursuant to a routine use published in 

the system’s notice of system of records. 

A ‘‘Routine use’’ must be compatible 

with the purpose for which SSA 

collected the information. 

(b) Notice of routine use disclosures. 

A list of permissible routine use 

disclosures is included in every system 

of records notice published in the 

Federal Register. 

(c) Determining compatibility. 

(1) Disclosure to carry out SSA 

programs. We disclose information for 

published routine uses necessary to 

carry out SSA’s programs. 

(2) Disclosure to carry out programs 

similar to SSA programs. We may 

disclose information for the 

administration of other government 

programs. These disclosures are 

pursuant to published routine uses 

where the use is compatible with the 

purpose for which the information was 

collected. These programs generally 

meet the following conditions: 

(i) The program is clearly identifiable 

as a Federal, State, or local government 

program. 

(ii) The information requested 

concerns eligibility, benefit amounts, or 

other matters of benefit status in a 

Social Security program and is relevant 

to determining the same matters in the 

other program. For example, we disclose 

information to the Railroad Retirement 

Board for pension and unemployment 

compensation programs, to the 

Department of Veterans Affairs for its 

benefit programs, to worker’s 

compensation programs, to State general 

assistance programs and to other income 

maintenance programs at all levels of 

government. We also disclose for health 

maintenance programs like Medicaid 

and Medicare. 

(iii) The information will be used for 

appropriate epidemiological or similar 

research purposes. 

■ 14. Section 401.155 is amended by 

adding the following language between 

the fourth and fifth sentences in 

paragraph (a) and by removing the last 

sentence of paragraph (b). 

§ 401.155 Law enforcement purposes. 

(a) General. * * * The Privacy Act 

allows us to disclose information if the 

head of the law enforcement agency 

makes a written request giving enough 

information to show that the conditions 

in paragraphs (b) or (c) of this section 

are met, what information is needed, 

and why it is needed. * * * 

* * * * * 

■ 15. Section 401.165 is amended by 

revising paragraph (b)(2) to read as 

follows: 

§ 401.165 Statistical and research 

activities. 

* * * * * 

(b) * * * 

(2) The activity is designed to increase 

knowledge about present or alternative 

Social Security programs or other 

Federal or State income-maintenance or 

health-maintenance programs; or is used 

for research that is of importance to the 

Social Security program or the Social 

Security beneficiaries; or an 

epidemiological research project that 

relates to the Social Security program or 

beneficiaries; and 

* * * * * 

■ 16. Section 401.175 is revised to read 

as follows: 

§ 401.175 Government Accountability 

Office. 

We disclose information to the 

Government Accountability Office when 

that agency needs the information to 

carry out its duties. 

■ 17. Section 401.180 is revised to read 

as follows: 

§ 401.180 Disclosure under court order or 

other legal process. 

(a) General. The Privacy Act permits 

us to disclose information when we are 

ordered to do so by a court of competent 

jurisdiction. When information is used 

in a court proceeding, it usually 

becomes part of the public record of the 

proceeding and its confidentiality often 

cannot be protected in that record. 

Much of the information that we collect 

and maintain in our records on 

individuals is especially sensitive. 

Therefore, we follow the rules in 

paragraph (d) of this section in deciding 

whether we may disclose information in 

response to an order from a court of 

competent jurisdiction. When we 

disclose pursuant to an order from a 

court of competent jurisdiction, and the 

order is a matter of public record, the 

Privacy Act requires us to send a notice 

of the disclosure to the last known 

address of the person whose record was 

disclosed. 

(b) Court. For purposes of this section, 

a court is an institution of the judicial 

branch of the U.S. Federal government 

consisting of one or more judges who 

seek to adjudicate disputes and 

administer justice. (See 404.2(c)(6) of 

this chapter). Entities not in the judicial 

branch of the Federal government are 

not courts for purposes of this section. 

(c) Court order. For purposes of this 

section, a court order is any legal 

process which satisfies all of the 

following conditions: 

(1) It is issued under the authority of 

a Federal court; 

(2) A judge or a magistrate judge of 

that court signs it; 

(3) It commands SSA to disclose 

information; and 

(4) The court is a court of competent 

jurisdiction. 

(d) Court of competent jurisdiction. It 

is the view of SSA that under the 

Privacy Act the Federal Government has 

not waived sovereign immunity, which 

precludes state court jurisdiction over a 

Federal agency or official. Therefore, 

SSA will not honor state court orders as 

a basis for disclosure. State court orders 

will be treated in accordance with the 

other provisions of this part. 

(e) Conditions for disclosure under a 

court order of competent jurisdiction. 

We disclose information in compliance 

with an order of a court of competent 

jurisdiction if—

(1) another section of this part 

specifically allows such disclosure, or 

(2) SSA, the Commissioner of Social 

Security, or any officer or employee of 

SSA in his or her official capacity is 

properly a party in the proceeding, or 

(3) disclosure of the information is 

necessary to ensure that an individual 


cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with RULES
20942 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 81 / Friday April 27, 2007 / Rules and Regulations 

who is accused of criminal activity 

receives due process of law in a 

criminal proceeding under the 

jurisdiction of the judicial branch of the 

Federal government. 

(f) In other circumstances. We may 

disclose information to a court of 

competent jurisdiction in circumstances 

other than those stated in paragraph (e) 

of this section. We will make our 

decision regarding disclosure by 

balancing the needs of a court while 

preserving the confidentiality of 

information. For example, we may 

disclose information under a court order 

that restricts the use and redisclosure of 

the information by the participants in 

the proceeding; we may offer the 

information for inspection by the court 

in camera and under seal; or we may 

arrange for the court to exclude 

information identifying individuals 

from that portion of the record of the 

proceedings that is available to the 

public. We will make these 

determinations in accordance with 

§ 401.140. 

(g) Other regulations on request for 

testimony, subpoenas and production of 

records in legal proceedings. See 20 CFR 

part 403 of this chapter for additional 

rules covering disclosure of information 

and records governed by this part and 

requested in connection with legal 

proceedings. 

[FR Doc. E7–7940 Filed 4–26–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4191–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES 

Food and Drug Administration 

21 CFR Part 2 

[Docket No. 2006N–0416] 

Use of Ozone-Depleting Substances; 

Removal of Essential Use 

Designations; Confirmation of 

Effective Date 

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, 

HHS. 

ACTION: Direct final rule; confirmation of 

effective date. 

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug 

Administration (FDA) is confirming the 

effective date of April 23, 2007, for the 

direct final rule that appeared in the 

Federal Register of December 7, 2006 

(71 FR 70870). The direct final rule 

amends the regulation to remove 

beclomethasone, dexamethasone, 

fluticasone, bitolterol, salmeterol, 

ergotamine tartrate, and ipratropium 

bromide, used in oral pressurized 

metered-dose inhalers, from the list of 

essential uses of ozone-depleting 

substances. None of these products is 

currently being marketed. This 

document confirms the effective date of 

the direct final rule. 

DATES: Effective date confirmed: April 

23, 2007, except for the removal of 

§ 2.125(e)(4)(v) (21 CFR 2.125(e)(4)(v)), 

which is effective August 1, 2007. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Martha Nguyen or Wayne H. Mitchell, 

Center for Drug Evaluation and Research 

(HFD–7), Food and Drug 

Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, 

Rockville, MD 20857, 301–594–2041. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the 

Federal Register of December 7, 2006 

(71 FR 70870), FDA solicited comments 

concerning the direct final rule for a 75- 

day period ending February 20, 2007. 

FDA stated that the effective date of the 

direct final rule would be on April 23, 

2007, 60 days after the end of the 

comment period, unless any significant 

adverse comment was submitted to FDA 

during the comment period. 

FDA received no significant adverse 

comments within the comment period. 

Therefore, under the Federal Food, 

Drug, and Cosmetic Act, the Clean Air 

Act, and under authority delegated to 

the Commissioner of Food and Drugs, 

after consultation with the 

Administrator of the Environmental 

Protection Agency, notice is given that 

no objections or requests for a hearing 

were filed in response to the December 

7, 2006, direct final rule. Accordingly, 

FDA is confirming that the amendment 

issued thereby is effective April 23, 

2007, except for the removal of 

§ 2.125(e)(4)(v), which is effective 

August 1, 2007. 

Dated: April 17, 2007. 

Jeffrey Shuren, 

Assistant Commissioner for Policy. 

[FR Doc. E7–8043 Filed 4–26–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4160–01–S 

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES 

Food and Drug Administration 

21 CFR Part 520 

Oral Dosage Form New Animal Drugs; 

Diclazuril 

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, 

HHS. 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug 

Administration (FDA) is amending the 

animal drug regulations to reflect 

approval of a new animal drug 

application (NADA) filed by ScheringPlough Animal Health Corp. The NADA 

provides for the veterinary prescription 

use of diclazuril oral pellets in horses 

for the treatment of equine protozoal 

myeloencephalitis. 

DATES: This rule is effective April 27, 

2007. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Melanie R. Berson, Center for Veterinary 

Medicine (HFV–110), Food and Drug 

Administration, 7500 Standish Pl., 

Rockville, MD 20855, 301–827–7540, email: melanie.berson@fda.hhs.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: ScheringPlough Animal Health Corp., 556 Morris 

Ave., Summit, NJ 07901, filed NADA 

141–268 for the veterinary prescription 

use of PROTAZIL (1.56% diclazuril) 

Antiprotozoal Pellets in horses for the 

treatment of equine protozoal 

myeloencephalitis (EPM) caused by 

Sarcocystis neurona. The NADA is 

approved as of March 29, 2007, and the 

regulations in 21 CFR part 520 are 

amended by adding new § 520.606 to 

reflect the approval. 

In accordance with the freedom of 

information provisions of 21 CFR part 

20 and 21 CFR 514.11(e)(2)(ii), a 

summary of safety and effectiveness 

data and information submitted to 

support approval of this application 

may be seen in the Division of Dockets 

Management (HFA–305), Food and Drug 

Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 

1061, Rockville, MD 20852, between 9 

a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through 

Friday. 

Under section 512(c)(2)(F)(ii) of the 

Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act 

(21 U.S.C. 360b(c)(2)(F)(ii)), this 

approval qualifies for 3 years of 

marketing exclusivity beginning March 

29, 2007. 

The agency has determined under 21 

CFR 25.33(d)(1) that this action is of a 

type that does not individually or 

cumulatively have a significant effect on 

the human environment. Therefore, 

neither an environmental assessment 

nor an environmental impact statement 

is required. 

This rule does not meet the definition 

of ‘‘rule’’ in 5 U.S.C. 804(3)(A) because 

it is a rule of ‘‘particular applicability.’’

Therefore, it is not subject to the 

congressional review requirements in 5 

U.S.C. 801–808. 

List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 520 

Animal drugs. 

■ Therefore, under the Federal Food, 

Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under 

authority delegated to the Commissioner 

of Food and Drugs and redelegated to 


cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with RULES