alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsAnisotropy of high temperature strength in precipitation-hardened nickel-base superalloy single crystalsThe anisotropy of high temperature strength of nickel-base superalloy, Alloy 454, in service for advanced jet engine turbine blades and vanes, was investigated. Crystallographic orientation dependence of tensile yield strength, creep and creep rupture strength was found to be marked at about 760C. In comparison with other single crystal data, a larger allowance in high strength off-axial orientation from the 001 axis, and relatively poor strength at near the -111 axis were noted. From transmission electron microscopy the anisotropic characteristics of this alloy were explained in terms of available slip systems and stacking geometries of gamma-prime precipitate cuboids which are well hardened by a large tantalum content. 100 cube slip was considered to be primarily responsible for the poor strength of the -111 axis orientation replacing the conventional 111 plane slip systems.Document ID19860015344Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeReprint (Version printed in journal)AuthorsNakagawa, Y. G.*(NASA Headquarters Washington, DC United States)*Terashima, H.*(NASA Headquarters Washington, DC United States)*Yoshizawa, H.*(NASA Headquarters Washington, DC United States)*Ohta, Y.*(NASA Headquarters Washington, DC United States)*Murakami, K.*(NASA Headquarters Washington, DC United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateMarch 1, 1986Publication InformationISSN: 0578-7904Subject CategoryMetallic MaterialsReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:88387NASA-TM-88387Accession Number86N24815Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NASW-4005Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19860015344.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
# C_2018381EN.01003102.xml

| 22.10.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 381/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.10.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 381/31

---

Order of the General Court of 13 July 2018 — BBY Solutions v EUIPO — Worldwide Sales Corporation España (BEST BUY)

(Case T-773/15) (1)

(2018/C 381/37)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 78, 29.2.2016.

---
Certifications

I, Richard Simpson, certify that:


1.	I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Trust 2016-GC37 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);


2.	Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;


3.	Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;


4.	Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and


5.	All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.


In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:  Wells Fargo Bank, National Association; Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association; Park Bridge Lender Services LLC; Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas; CoreLogic Solutions, LLC; Berkadia Commercial Mortgage LLC; KeyBank National Association; Pentalpha Surveillance LLC; Greystone Servicing Company LLC; Computershare Trust Company, National Association; U.S. Bank National Association; and Wilmington Trust, National Association.

Date:	March 31, 2023

/s/ Richard Simpson ___________________Richard SimpsonPresident, Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc.(senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)

CGCMT 2016-GC37 Certifications

---
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v JACK PERRY, Corporal, U. S. Marine Corps, Appellant

8 USCMA 401, 24 CMR 211

No. 10,597

Decided November 8, 1957

*Major R. D. Humphreys*was on the brief for Appellant, Accused. *Major Charles R. Larouehe*was on the brief for Appellee, United States.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam :

At his trial for the theft of the hub caps from an automobile, the accused contested the voluntariness of his pretrial confession. The president admitted the statement in evidence. In part, he instructed the Court members that they “should give weight to the statement only to the extent that . . . [they] believe it truthful.” Other parts of his instruction are substantially like those in United States v Jones, 7 USCMA 623, 23 CMR 87. These instructions are erroneous and require reversal of the conviction. United States v Schwed, 8 USCMA 305, 24 CMR 115.

The decision of the board of review is reversed and the findings of guilty and the sentence are set aside. A rehearing may be ordered.
No. 41971.

#### Protests 324102-G, etc., of Ovington Bros. Co. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of boxes, bottles, and bonbonnieres chiefly used in the household for utilitarian purposes. The claim at 40 percent under paragraph 339 was therefore sustained. *United States*v. *Friedlaender*(21 C. C. P. A. 103, T. D. 46445) and *Dow*v. *United States*(id. 282, T. D. 46816) cited.
|   | EXHIBIT      31.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY      ACT |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                         |                                                                            |                               |
|------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------|
|                         | UNITED      MORTGAGE TRUST                                                      |
|                    |                                                                       |                          |
| Date: May      15, 2009 | By                                                                    | /s/ Christine      A. Griffin |
|                         | President,  Chief      Executive Officer and Chief Financial  Officer |
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 83 (Tuesday, May 1, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 23802]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-8279]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

(A-475-703)


Granular Polytetrafluoroethylene Resin from Italy; Notice of 
Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 
Administrative Review

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

EFFECTIVE DATE: May 1, 2007.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Salim Bhabhrawala at (202) 482-1784, 
AD/CVD Operations, Office 1, Import Administration, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and 
Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On September 29, 2006, the Department of Commerce (the Department) 
published a notice of initiation of administrative review of the 
antidumping duty order on granular polytetrafluoroethylene resin from 
Italy. See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Administrative Reviews, 71 FR 57465 (September 29, 2006). The period of 
review is August 1, 2005, through July 31, 2006, and the preliminary 
results are currently due no later than May 3, 2007. The review covers 
one producer/exporter of the subject merchandise.

Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary Results

    Pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 
amended (the Act), the Department shall make a preliminary 
determination in an administrative review of an antidumping order 
within 245 days after the last day of the anniversary month of the date 
of publication of the order. The Act further provides, however, that 
the Department may extend the 245-day period to 365 days if it 
determines it is not practicable to complete the review within the 
foregoing time period. We determine that it is not practicable to 
complete this administrative review within the time limits mandated by 
section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act because this review involves a number 
of complicated issues (e.g., the calculation of general and 
administrative expenses and U.S. warehousing), which must be addressed 
prior to the issuance of the preliminary results. The Department 
requires additional time to analyze the respondent's questionnaire 
response and issue any necessary supplemental questionnaires.
    Accordingly, the Department is extending, by 71 days, the time 
limit for completion of the preliminary results of this administrative 
review until no later than July 13, 2007. We intend to issue the final 
results no later than 120 days after the publication of the preliminary 
results notice.
    This extension is in accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A) of the 
Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(2).

    Dated: April 24, 2007.
Stephen J. Claeys,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. E7-8279 Filed 4-30-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE: 3510-DS-S
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 159 

Expressing the support of Congress for a National Complex Regional Pain 

Syndrome and Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy Awareness Month. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 24, 2007 

Mr. BISHOP of New York (for himself and Mr. KILDEE) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 

Energy and Commerce 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Expressing the support of Congress for a National Complex 

Regional Pain Syndrome and Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy Awareness Month. 

Whereas complex regional pain syndrome, also known as reflex sympathetic dystrophy, is a very painful, underdiagnosed, and undertreated neurological syndrome that 

may result from simple trauma, infection, or surgery that 

can lead to disability; 

Whereas the incidence of complex regional pain syndrome is 

yet to be determined, the number of cases of such syndrome can be more than 1.5 million; 

Whereas the symptoms of complex regional pain syndrome include constant burning pain that is disproportionate to 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
2 

•HCON 159 IH 

any inciting event, inflammation, muscle spasms, abnormal skin temperature, and skin color changes; 

Whereas a recent Internet survey conducted by the Johns 

Hopkins School of Medicine and funded by the Reflex 

Sympathetic Dystrophy Syndrome Association revealed 

that complex regional pain syndrome is not only painful 

but adversely affects lives and livelihoods; 

Whereas there is no known cure for complex regional pain 

syndrome, but early and appropriate interdisciplinary 

treatment can achieve a restoration of function; and 

Whereas such treatment may prevent a case of early-onset 

complex regional pain syndrome from becoming intractable, debilitating, and incredibly expensive to treat: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That the Congress— 

3 (1) supports the goals and ideals of a month to 

4 educate the public and medical professionals about 

5 the nature and impact of complex regional pain syn6 drome, also known as reflex sympathetic dystrophy, 

7 and the importance of the early detection and proper 

8 treatment of such syndrome; 

9 (2) honors the goals and ideals and applauds 

10 the work of national and community organizations 

11 that promote public awareness about complex re12 gional pain syndrome and that provide information 

13 and support to people suffering with this syndrome; 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
3 

•HCON 159 IH 

1 (3) encourages health care providers to continue 

2 to increase their efforts to diagnose complex regional 

3 pain syndrome in its earliest possible stages to in4 crease the likelihood of remission; 

5 (4) supports increased funding for research to 

6 determine the causes of, and improved treatment 

7 and cure for, complex regional pain syndrome; and 

8 (5) continues to consider ways to improve ac9 cess to, and the quality of, health care services for 

10 detecting and treating complex regional pain syn11 drome. 

Æ 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
Before the First Division,

June 1, 1949

No. 53211.

#### Saul H. Gilbert et al. *v.*United States,

protests 91273-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 82 (Monday, April 30, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21298-21299]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-8133]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration


Importer of Controlled Substances Notice of Application

    This is notice that on January 26, 2007, Stepan Company, Natural 
Products Department, 100 W. Hunter Avenue, Maywood, New Jersey 07607, 
made application by renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration 
(DEA) for registration as an importer of Coca Leaves (9040), a basic 
class of controlled substance listed in schedule II.
    The company plans to import the listed controlled substance for the 
manufacture of a bulk controlled substance for distribution to its 
customer.
    As noted in a previous notice published in the Federal Register on 
September 23, 1975, (40 FR 43745), all applicants for registration to 
import a basic class of any controlled substances in schedule I or II 
are, and will continue to be, required to demonstrate to the

[[Page 21299]]

Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration, that the requirements for such registration 
pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 958(a), 21 U.S.C. 823(a), and 21 CFR 1301.34(b), 
(c), (d), (e) and (f) are satisfied.

    Dated: April 17, 2007.
Joseph T. Rannazzisi,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
 [FR Doc. E7-8133 Filed 4-27-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
#### ORION INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGIES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee, and Flore Industries, Inc., Defendant.

No. 05-5148.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Aug. 23, 2005.

ORDER

The appellant having failed to pay the docketing fee required by Federal Circuit *356Rule 52(a)(1) within the time permitted by the rules, it is

ORDERED that the notice of appeal be, and the same hereby is, DISMISSED, for failure to prosecute in accordance with the rules.
No. 54258.

#### Standard Wine & Liquor Co., Inc., and Wine Shippers Import Corp. *v.*United States,

protests 152117-K and 151997-K (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial it was stipulated that the merchandise, issues, and facts herein are similar to those involved in *United States*v. *Browne Vintners Co., Inc.*(34 C. C. P. A. 112, C. A. D. 351) and that the quantities reported by the inspector as manifested, not found, were not in fact received by the importers. In accordance with stipulation and following the decision cited it was held that the merchandise, insofar as it involves the quantities reported by the inspector as manifested, not found, is subject to an allowance in duties. The protests were sustained to this extent.
No. 53177.

#### Hudson Shipping Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 68723-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE
QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          95,602
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  235,371
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    268,151
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,098,227
<PP&E>                                       9,139,460
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,219,251
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              16,387,901
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,895,212
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        27,045
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                16,387,901
<SALES>                                        855,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,777,590
<CGS>                                          509,692
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  509,692
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,237,972
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              45,433
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,015,507)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,015,507)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.37)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.37)
        

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**
 
 
 CERTIFICATION
      UNDER SECTION 906
 OF
      THE
 SARBANES-OXLEY
      ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In
      connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Unico American Corporation
      (the "Company") for the period ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Lester A. Aaron, Treasurer
      and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:
 
 1.
            the
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
                and
 
 2.
            the
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.
 
 
 
 /s/  Lester
      A. Aaron
 Name:                              Lester
      A. Aaron
 Title:                                Treasurer,
      Chief Financial Officer
 Date:                                November
      12, 2007
 
 
 
 
 A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to Unico American Corporation, and will
      be
      retained by Unico American Corporation, and furnished to the Securities and
      Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2015096EN.01002501.xml

| 23.3.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 96/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.3.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 96/25

---

Action brought on 8 January 2015 — ZZ v Commission

(Case F-2/15)

(2015/C 096/31)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: A. Véghely, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision refusing the applicant an installation allowance and a daily subsistence allowance and application to order the Commission to pay those allowances with interest.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the Commission’s decision of 4 March 2014 insofar as it refuses to grant him the installation allowance and daily subsistence allowance provided for in Article 5(1) and Article 10(1) of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the Commission’s decision of 4 March 2014 insofar as it refuses to grant him the installation allowance and daily subsistence allowance provided for in Article 5(1) and Article 10(1) of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations;

| — | order the Commission to pay him the installation allowance and daily subsistence allowance on taking up his appointment, together with interest from the dates on which those amounts became payable pursuant to Annex VII to the Staff Regulations; and |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay him the installation allowance and daily subsistence allowance on taking up his appointment, together with interest from the dates on which those amounts became payable pursuant to Annex VII to the Staff Regulations; and

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs.

---
(Reap. Dec. 9391)

#### M. Grumbacher, Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 725805.

(Decided April 8, 1959)

*John J. Verdón*for the plaintiff.

*George Oochram, Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for tbe defendant. •

Lawrence, Judge:

When the above-enumerated appeal for a reappraisement was called for hearing, there was no appearance on behalf of plaintiff.

An examination of the official record discloses no reason for disturbing the presumptively correct value for the merchandise found by the appraiser.

*600I, therefore, find and hold the proper dutiable value of the merchandise covered by said appeal to be the value found by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.