alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2016462EN.01001801.xml

| 12.12.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 462/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.12.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 462/18

---

Judgment of the General Court of 26 October 2016 — Jaber v Council

(Case T-154/15) (1)

1

((Common Foreign and Security Policy - Restrictive measures taken against Syria - Freezing of funds - Annulment of prior measures by a judgment of the General Court - New measures including the applicant's name on the lists - Action for annulment - Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure - Content of the application - Admissibility - Obligation to state reasons - Burden of proof - Right to property - Freedom to conduct a business))

(2016/C 462/21)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Aiman Jaber (Lattakia, Syria) (represented by: A. Boesch, D. Amaudruz and M. Ponsard, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: B. Driessen and S. Kyriakopoulou, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought on the basis of Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of Council Implementing Decision 2015/117/CFSP of 26 January 2015 implementing Decision 2013/255/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Syria (OJ 2015, L 20, p. 85), and of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/108 of 26 January 2015 implementing Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria (OJ 2015, L 20, p. 2), in so far as the name of the applicant is included in the list of persons and entities subject to the restrictive measures.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1) | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1)

Dismisses the action;

| 2) | Orders Mr Aiman Jaber to bear his own costs and to pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union in the context of the present proceedings and during the proceedings for an interim order. |
| --- | --- |

2)

Orders Mr Aiman Jaber to bear his own costs and to pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union in the context of the present proceedings and during the proceedings for an interim order.

---

(1)  OJ C 190, 8.6.2015.

1

---
**
**Exhibit 34.1**

**REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

Board of Directors 

Mechanics Bank 

Walnut Creek, California 

We have examined management’sassertion, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Assessment of Compliance with SEC Regulation AB Servicing Criteria, that Mechanics Bank (the “Bank”) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of theSecurities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2019 (the “Reporting Period”) for the asset-backed securities transactions for which the Bank acts as servicer of automotive retailinstallment sales contracts included in private and public securitizations sponsored by the Bank (the “Platform”), except for servicing criteria 1122(d)(2)(iv), 1122(d)(2)(vi), 1122(d)(3)(ii)-(iv), 1122(d)(4)(ix)-(xiii) and 1122(d)(4)(xv),for which the Bank has determined are not applicable to the activities performed with respect to the Platform. Appendix B to management’s report identifies the individual asset-backed transactions and securities defined by management asconstituting the Platform. Management is responsible for the Bank’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assertion based on our examination. 

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly,included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Bank’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of selectedasset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing of selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Bank processed those selected transactions and performed those servicing activities incompliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Bank during the period covered by the report. Our procedures were not designed to detectnoncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Bank during the period covered by this report. We believe that our examinationprovides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Bank’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. 

In our opinion, management’s assertion that the Bank complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year endedDecember 31, 2019 for the Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects. 

 

/s/ Crowe LLP

Sacramento, California

March 25, 2020
**
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 79 (Wednesday, April 25, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 20545-20546]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-7924]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EXPORT-IMPORT BANK OF THE UNITED STATES


Economic Impact Policy

    This notice is to inform the public that the Export-Import Bank of 
the United States has received an application to finance the export of 
approximately $29.5 million in U.S. machine tooling equipment to a 
company in China. The U.S. exports will enable the Chinese company to 
establish production of 180 metal-stamping dies per year. These 
products will be utilized by companies in China to manufacture medium- 
to large-sized auto body parts. A portion of this new production will 
be employed internally by the Chinese company itself to manufacture 
medium-to large-sized auto body parts for sale to Chinese automobile 
manufacturers/assemblers. No automobiles will be produced by this 
Chinese firm. This Chinese company's average annual production capacity 
of auto body parts will be enough to contribute to the production of 
approximately 380,000 automobiles per year during the 7-year repayment 
term of the loan. Available information indicates that all of this new 
Chinese production will be consumed in China. Interested parties may 
submit comments on this transaction by e-mail to 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c6a3a5a9a8a9abafa5e8afabb6a7a5b286a3beafabe8a1a9b0"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4623252928292b2f25682f2b3627253206233e2f2b68212930">[email protected]</span></a> or by mail to 811 Vermont Avenue, NW., Room 
1238, Washington, DC 20571, within 14

[[Page 20546]]

days of the date this notice appears in the Federal Register.

Helene S. Walsh,
Director, Policy Oversight and Review.
[FR Doc. E7-7924 Filed 4-24-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6690-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**Certification of the Chief Financial OfficerPursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)**

               I, Frederic F. Brace, the Executive Vice President and Chief FinancialOfficer of United Air Lines, Inc. (the "Company") certify that to the bestof my knowledge, based upon a review of the quarterly report on Form 10-Qfor the period ended September 30, 2005 of the Company (the "Report"):(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operationsof the Company.  /s/ Frederic F. Brace________Frederic F. BraceUnited Air Lines. Inc.Executive Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerNovember 14, 2005
No. 45181.

#### Protests 43848-K, etc., of Mattia Locatelli New York Branch, Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of *Locatelli*v. *United States*(T. D. 48284 and T. D. 49389) it was held that an allowance should have been made in the weight of the cheese to compensate for the inedible coverings.
# C_2016016EN.01001401.xml

| 18.1.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 16/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.1.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 16/14

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Baden-Württemberg (Germany) lodged on 8 September 2015 — Peter Radgen, Lilian Radgen v Finanzamt Ettlingen

(Case C-478/15)

(2016/C 016/16)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Finanzgericht Baden-Württemberg

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Peter Radgen, Lilian Radgen

Applicants:

Defendant: Finanzamt Ettlingen

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Must the provisions of the Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Swiss Confederation, of the other, on the free movement of persons of 21 June 1999 (OJ 2002 L 114, p. 6), in particular its preamble, Articles 1, 2, 4, 11, 16, 21 thereof and Articles 7, 9 and 15 of Annex I thereto, be interpreted as precluding legislation of a Member State under which a citizen with unlimited tax liability in that State is denied the deduction of a tax-free allowance for a part-time teaching activity because that activity is not carried out for or on behalf of a public-law legal person established in a Member State of the European Union or in a State to which the Agreement on the European Economic Area applies, but is carried out for or on behalf of a public-law legal person established in the territory of the Swiss Confederation?

---
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-10-00347-CR

No. 10-10-00348-CR

TODD PHILLIPPI,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law

Ellis County, Texas

Trial Court Nos. 05-C-3702 and 05-C-3707

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The briefs in these appeals were originally due to be filed by February 4, 2011. 

When no briefs were filed, a late brief notice was sent to appellant, Todd Phillippi, on 

February 15, 2011. Twenty days later, Phillippi’s motion for extension of time to file his 

briefs was filed. The Court granted an extension of time to file the briefs to June 20, 

2011. No briefs were filed for Phillippi.

By letter dated June 30, 2011, the Clerk of this Court notified Phillippi that 

pursuant to Rules 38.8(a)(1) and 42.3 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, the 
Phillippi v. State Page 2

Court would dismiss these appeals for want of prosecution unless, within 21 days of the 

date of the letter, a brief was filed in each of these appeals. Phillippi was further 

warned that if no briefs were filed by 5:00 p.m. on July 21, 2011, these appeals would be 

dismissed. TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b). No briefs were filed by the 5:00 p.m. deadline.

Accordingly, these appeals are dismissed.

TOM GRAY

Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Appeal dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed August 3, 2011

Do not publish 

[CV06]
Exhibit 32


Certification Pursuant to





18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


As Adopted Pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002




I, Gordon R. Arnold, certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, that:




i.  The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Sierra Monitor Corporation for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2011  fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and;




ii. The information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Sierra Monitor Corporation.




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Sierra Monitor Corporation and will be retained by Sierra Monitor Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




Date:          May 11, 2011
By:
/s/ Gordon R. ArnoldGordon R. ArnoldChief Executive OfficerChief Financial Officer
# C_2015429EN.01003004.xml

| 21.12.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 429/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.12.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 429/30

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 11 November 2015 — GM and GN v Commission

(Case F-81/15) (1)

1

(2015/C 429/43)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 262, 10/8/2015, p. 42.

1

---
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Argan, Inc. , a Delaware corporation
(the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the period ended October 31, 2006, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Rainer Bosselmann, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
            respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
            Company.

Date: December 13, 2006                By: /s/ Rainer Bosselmann
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Rainer Bosselmann
                                           Chairman of the Board and
                                           Chief Executive Officer
# Official Journal C 48/2013

| | ISSN 1977-091X
  doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2013.048.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 48 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5619 February 2013 |

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2013.048.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 48

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5619 February 2013

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Parliament |
| 2013/C 048/01 | Decision | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Parliament

2013/C 048/01

Decision

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
|   |
|---|
|   |  |
| 1 | I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Chiquita Brands International, Inc.; |

|   |
|---|
|   |  |
| 2 | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |

|                        |
|------------------------|
|                        |  |  |
|                   |   |   |
| Date: February 6, 2012 |   | /s/ Michael B. Sims |
|                   |   | Title:    Chief Financial Officer |
# C_2015213EN.01001401.xml

| 29.6.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 213/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.6.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 213/14

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Hannover (Germany) lodged on 23 February 2015 — TUIfly GmbH v Wieland Volkert, Sonja Volkert, Linda Volkert

(Case C-83/15)

(2015/C 213/21)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Landgericht Hannover

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant and defendant: TUIfly GmbH

Appellant and defendant:

Respondents and applicants: Wieland Volkert, Sonja Volkert, Linda Volkert

Respondents and applicants:

The case was removed from the Register of the Court of Justice by order of the Court of 23 April 2015.

---
# C_2016156EN.01005601.xml

| 2.5.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 156/56 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.5.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 156/56

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 17 March 2016 — GZ v Parliament

(Case F-109/15) (1)

1

(2016/C 156/78)

Language of the case: German

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 328, 5/10/2015, p. 36.

1

---
# C_2016111EN.01000602.xml

| 29.3.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 111/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.3.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 111/6

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Vrhovno sodišče Republike Slovenije (Slovenia) lodged on 31 December 2015 — LEK Farmacevtska Družba d.d. v Republic of Slovenia

(Case C-700/15)

(2016/C 111/08)

Language of the case: Slovenian

Referring court

Referring court

Vrhovno sodišče Republike Slovenije

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: LEK Farmacevtska Družba d.d.

Appellant:

Respondent: Republic of Slovenia

Respondent:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | May the provisions of Chapter 30 of the CN be interpreted as meaning that a product, whose main component is an active ingredient (probiotic bacteria) contained in food supplements classified under tariff heading 2106 90 98 CN, is not to be classified in that chapter? |
| --- | --- |

1.

May the provisions of Chapter 30 of the CN be interpreted as meaning that a product, whose main component is an active ingredient (probiotic bacteria) contained in food supplements classified under tariff heading 2106 90 98 CN, is not to be classified in that chapter?

| 2. | For a product to be classified in Chapter 30 of the CN, is it sufficient that the manufacturer presents that product, which contains an active ingredient having beneficial effects on health in general which is often found in food supplements, as a medicinal product, and markets and sells it as such? |
| --- | --- |

2.

For a product to be classified in Chapter 30 of the CN, is it sufficient that the manufacturer presents that product, which contains an active ingredient having beneficial effects on health in general which is often found in food supplements, as a medicinal product, and markets and sells it as such?

| 3. | In the light of the evolution of EU law regulating the market for medicinal products, must the concept of ‘clearly defined therapeutic or prophylactic characteristics’ which, according to the settled case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Union, is a condition for classification in Chapter 30, be interpreted as corresponding to the definition of medicinal product within the meaning of the provisions of EU law relating to medicinal products for human use? |
| --- | --- |

3.

In the light of the evolution of EU law regulating the market for medicinal products, must the concept of ‘clearly defined therapeutic or prophylactic characteristics’ which, according to the settled case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Union, is a condition for classification in Chapter 30, be interpreted as corresponding to the definition of medicinal product within the meaning of the provisions of EU law relating to medicinal products for human use?

---
Case: 2:11-cv-00480-GLF-EPD Doc #: 153 Filed: 03/19/14 Page: 1 of 13  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00480-GLF-EPD Doc #: 153 Filed: 03/19/14 Page: 2 of 13  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00480-GLF-EPD Doc #: 153 Filed: 03/19/14 Page: 3 of 13  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00480-GLF-EPD Doc #: 153 Filed: 03/19/14 Page: 4 of 13  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00480-GLF-EPD Doc #: 153 Filed: 03/19/14 Page: 5 of 13  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00480-GLF-EPD Doc #: 153 Filed: 03/19/14 Page: 6 of 13  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00480-GLF-EPD Doc #: 153 Filed: 03/19/14 Page: 7 of 13  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00480-GLF-EPD Doc #: 153 Filed: 03/19/14 Page: 8 of 13  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00480-GLF-EPD Doc #: 153 Filed: 03/19/14 Page: 9 of 13  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00480-GLF-EPD Doc #: 153 Filed: 03/19/14 Page: 10 of 13  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00480-GLF-EPD Doc #: 153 Filed: 03/19/14 Page: 11 of 13  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00480-GLF-EPD Doc #: 153 Filed: 03/19/14 Page: 12 of 13  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00480-GLF-EPD Doc #: 153 Filed: 03/19/14 Page: 13 of 13  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-11T21:19:45-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
----

Order of the Court of First Instance of 5 May 2006 — Tesoka v EUROFOUND

(Case T-398/05) (1)

(Referral to the Civil Service Tribunal)

(2006/C 165/52)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Sabrina Tesoka (Overijse, Belgium) (represented by: J.-L. Fagnart, lawyer)

Defendant: European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions (EUROFOUND) (represented by: C. Callanan, lawyer)

Re:

Action under Article 236 EC

Operative part of the order

Case T-398/05 is referred to the Civil Service Tribunal.

----

(1)OJ C 10, 14.1.2006.

----
No. 43089.

#### Protest 984771-G of Burritt Lumber Sales Co., Inc. (Detroit).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

The facts disclosed that in Canada the lumber was planed and that there was an advance in value and improvement in condition thereof. There was no evidence that any attempt was made to comply with the regulations required by paragraph 1615. *Clukey*v. *United States*(T. D. 45373) cited. On the record presented the protest was overruled.