alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Certification of the Principal Financial OfficerPursuant to 15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)(Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)**

I, Frederic F. Brace, the Executive Vice President and Chief FinancialOfficer of United Air Lines, Inc. (the "Company"), certify that:(1)     I have reviewed this quarterly reporton Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 of the Company; (2)     Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report; (3)     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,and other financial information included in this report, fairly presentin all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented inthis report; (4)     The Company's other certifying officer andI are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controlsand procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))for the Company and we have: (a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed underour supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this reportis being prepared; (b)     Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company'sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as ofthe end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;and (c)     Disclosed in this report any change in theCompany's internal control over financial reporting that occurred duringthe Company's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected,or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal controlover financial reporting; and(5)     The Company's other certifying officer andI have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the Company's auditors and the audit committeeof Company's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): (a)     All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Company'sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and (b)     Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the Company'sinternal control over financial reporting. /s/ Frederic F. BraceFrederic F. BraceUnited Air Lines, Inc.Executive Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerApril 30, 2004
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 80 (Thursday, April 26, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 20874]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-7966]



[[Page 20874]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-60,819]


Enhanced Mfg. Solutions Formerly Known as Viking New Castle, LLC 
Including Leased Workers of HSS Material Management Solutions and 
Oberle & Associates, Inc. Working On-Site at Delphi, New Castle, IN; 
Amended Certification Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker 
Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 
2273), and Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974 (26 U.S.C. 2813), as 
amended, the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility 
to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade 
Adjustment Assistance on February 13, 2007, applicable to workers of 
Enhanced Mfg. Solutions, formerly known as Viking New Castle, LLC, 
working on-site at Delphi, New Castle, Indiana. The notice was 
published in the Federal Register on February 27, 2007 (72 FR 8794).
    At the request of the State agency, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers are 
contracted to produce steering columns on-site at Delphi.
    New information shows that leased workers of HSS Material 
Management Solutions and Oberle & Associates, Inc. were employed on-
site at the New Castle, Indiana location of Delphi.
    Based on these findings, the Department is amending this 
certification to include leased workers of HSS Material Management 
Solutions and Oberle & Associates, Inc. working on-site at Delphi, New 
Castle, Indiana.
    The intent of the Department's certification is to include all 
workers employed on-site at Delphi, New Castle, Indiana who were 
adversely affected by a shift in production to Mexico.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-60,819 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    All workers of Enhanced Mfg. Solutions, formerly known as Viking 
New Castle, LLC, including leased workers of HSS Material Management 
Solutions and Oberle & Associates, Inc., working on-site at Delphi, 
New Castle, Indiana, who became totally or partially separated from 
employment on or after January 15, 2006, through February 13, 2009, 
are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Section 223 of 
the Trade Act of 1974, and are also eligible to apply for 
alternative trade adjustment assistance under Section 246 of the 
Trade Act of 1974.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 20th day of April 2007.
Richard Church,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E7-7966 Filed 4-25-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
#### J. E. Bernard *&*Co., Inc. *v.*United States

No. 7428.

Invoice dated London, England, May 11, 1946.

Certified May 15, 1946.

Entered at New York, N. Y., July 5, 1946.

Entry No. 701196.

*284(Decided October 31, 1947)

*Wallace & Schwartz (Barnes, Richardson & Colburn by Joseph Schwartz*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Mollison, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

- On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
COMPANY'S  BALANCE  SHEET AND  STATEMENT OF  OPERATIONS  AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND THE NOTES THERETO.
</LEGEND>

<MULTIPLIER>             1,000


<S>                                              <C>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  Dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                     Jan-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                       Sep-30-1999
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                            9-MOS
<CASH>                                                     178
<SECURITIES>                                                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                                             1463
<ALLOWANCES>                                               133
<INVENTORY>                                               1109
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                          2973
<PP&E>                                                     892
<DEPRECIATION>                                             686
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                            3728
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                      884
<BONDS>                                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                        0
<PREFERRED>                                                  0
<COMMON>                                                  3160
<OTHER-SE>                                                   0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                              3728
<SALES>                                                   4985
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                          4985
<CGS>                                                     1941
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                             1941
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          3239
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                        (15)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                          (180)
<INCOME-TAX>                                              (44)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      (136)
<DISCONTINUED>                                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                              0
<CHANGES>                                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                                             (136)
<EPS-BASIC>                                              (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            (.01)


</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

TONI PATRICK,

Appellant,

v.

BOLD ROOFING CO.,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 15

- 00148

- CV

Appeal from

193rd District Court

of Dallas County, Texas

(TC # DC

- 14

- 06390)

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Pending before the Court is the joint motion of Appellant, Toni Patrick , and Appellee,

Bold Roofing Company, to vacate the trial court ’ s judgment. See T EX .R.A PP .P. 42.1(a)(2). The

motion is granted. Accordingly, the trial court ’ s judgment is set aside a nd the cause is remanded

to the trial court for further proceedings in accord ance with the parties’ agreement. The motion

does not address costs. Accordingly, c osts of the appeal are taxed against Appellant. See

T EX .R.A PP .P. 42.1(d) (“Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the

appellant”).

July 8, 2015

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.
p. 1


# OAR Box 1384 Prepped by Charmelle Mathews



### Document

Number: 

# 47 ) ll-E- 7 Docket Number: 

# A-94-5 2

Printed 7/2/2008 8:42:04

AM Sheet 47 of 264P. 2

CONTAC T REPOR T FOR

M PE S PROJEC T NO . N20 4

Compan y Contac t Phon e Weatherly , Inc . Magnu s Danielso n(404 ) 873-503 0 Descriptio n Weatherl y

market s th e Polya d adsorptio ncontro l syste m i nth e U.S . Mr . Danielso nsai d tha t on e syste m i s installe d t o contro l styren e i nDenmark , two o r thre e inGermany , an d on e i nSweden . Th e onl y tes t informatio navailabl e i s th e 199 3 testin g a t Elje r i nWilson , NC . A second generation , preconcentrator typ e system

(whic hwoul d wor k inconjunctio nwit ha nincinerator ) i s unde r developmen t inSweden , an d th e compan

y plan s t o increas e it s marketin g effor t i n th e U.S . Tes t result s ar e expecte d soonfro m Europe , an

d Mr . Danielso nwil l send them .

' , :>-l t /il.' T (
""^t-f .
(Reap. Dec. 8376)

Entry Nos. 761955; 815449.

#### Terra Chemicals, Inc., et al. *v.*United States

(Decided December 28, 1954)

*Eugene R. Pickrell*for the plaintiffs.

*Warren E. Burger,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Wilson, Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement have been submitted for decision upon an agreed set of facts entered into by and between counsel for the respective parties hereto.

On the agreed facts, I find the American selling price, as that value is defined in section 402 (g) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by section 8 of the Customs Administrative Act of 1938, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the isatin here involved, and that such value was $3.30 per pound.

The appeals having been abandoned insofar as they relate to all other merchandise, to that extent the appeals are hereby dismissed. Judgment will be entered accordingly.
(Reap. Dec. 9811)

#### Bell Products Company *v.*United States

Entry Nos. 1102, etc.

*511(Decided October 14, 1960)

*Maw W. Kramer*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

EichardsoN, Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement, which were consolidated for the purposes of trial, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation entered into by counsel for the parties:

> * * * that the merchandise at bar, exported from Japan during the period October 14, 1958, to February 1, 1959, inclusive, consists of crystal earphones in an unfinished condition.

> * * * that after importation, said earphones were permanently soldered to transistor radio chassis, whereby said earphones became a permanent, integral part of said radios.

> That said merchandise was appraised on the basis of export value, as that value is defined in Section 402, Tariff Act of 1930, as amended. The basis of appraisement is not here in dispute.

> The said merchandise was entered at a value of $.182 each, f.o.b., net packed and was appraised at $.20 each, f.o.b., net packed.

> The export value for such merchandise is the entered value.

Upon the agreed facts of record, I find and hold that export value, as that value is defined in 19 U.S.C.A. section 1402(d) (§402(d), Tariff Act of 1930), is the proper basis for determining the value of the involved crystal earphones and that said value is represented by the entered value.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
STANDARD REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT CBI: No PMN: 09-0416 Focus Ready Draft 4/16/2009 Standard Review Report 6/22/2009

ENGINEER: Arnold \ AH PV (kg/yr):

SUBMITTER:

USE:

OTHER USES:

MSDS: Label: No

Gen Eqpt: Respirator:
Health Effects: TLV/PEL:

LVE PPE:

CRSS : Chemical Name: S-H20: 0.000001 g/L @
VP: 1.0E-6 torr @
MW: %<500 %<1000 Physical State and Misc CRSS Info: Neat: Mfg: Proc/Form:
End Use:Consumer Use:

SAT (concerns) (04/10/2009): Related Cases and Related Cases and Misc SAT Info:

Migration to groundwater: Unknown PBT rating: PBT1 P=U; B=U Health: 1-2 Dermal, Inhalation
Eco: 1 No releases to Water

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 1-2A

NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS: Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER.

POLLUTION PREVENTION CONSIDERATIONS: P2 Claim:

EXPOSURE-BASED REVIEW: NoINITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT CBI: No PMN: 09-0416

Processing:

Number of Sites/ Location: Days/yr: Basis:

Process Description:

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY IRER Note: The daily releases listed for any source below may coincide with daily releases from the other sources to the same medium.OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY Tot. # of workers exposed via assessed routes: Basis:

Inhalation:

Dermal:CBI: No

MEMORANDUM of CBI TELEPHONE CONVERSATION

CALL BY: Ariel Hou Organization: ERG

CALL TO:

Organization:

Date: 04/13/2009

Time: 11AM

Phone:

Concerning what TSCA CBI?

PMN: 09-0416
<PAGE>


                                                                      Exhibit 11


                               TYCO INTERNATIONAL LTD.
                            EARNINGS PER SHARE COMPUTATION
                       (In thousands, except per share amounts)
                                           
                                           
                                                     THREE MONTHS ENDED 
                                                         SEPTEMBER 30,        
                                                ------------------------------
                                                    1996               1995    
                                                 ----------         ---------- 

CALCULATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE:
PRIMARY:

Weighted average common shares outstanding
   during the period                                154,007        152,796

Effect of the restricted stock plan, stock
   options and warrants using the treasury stock
   method                                               607           (56)
                                                 -----------     ----------

Total common equivalent shares                      154,614        152,740
                                                 -----------     ----------
                                                 -----------     ----------

Net income                                         $ 83,050       $ 65,664
                                                 -----------     ----------
                                                 -----------     ----------

Earnings per share                               $     0.54     $     0.43
                                                  -----------    ----------
                                                  -----------    ----------


FULLY DILUTED(1):

Weighted average common shares outstanding
    during the period                               154,007        152,796

Effect of the restricted stock plan, stock
    options and warrants using the treasury 
    stock method                                        646             73
                                                 -----------     ----------

Total common equivalent shares                      154,653        152,868
                                                 -----------     ----------
                                                 -----------     ----------
Net income                                         $ 83,050       $ 65,664
                                                 -----------     ----------
                                                 -----------     ----------

Earnings per share                               $      .54     $      .43
                                                 -----------     ----------
                                                 -----------     ----------



(1) This calculation is submitted in accordance with Regulation S-K item 601
    (b)(11) although not required by Footnote 2 to Paragraph 14 of APB Opinion
    No. 15 because it results in dilution of less than 3%.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>           5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          90,808
<SECURITIES>                                 3,345,804
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,178,433
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            11,947,500
<PP&E>                                     110,813,544
<DEPRECIATION>                              31,544,230
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              91,216,815
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,054,615
<BONDS>                                     53,094,549
<COMMON>                                       183,430
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                  28,658,551
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                91,216,815
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            10,404,324
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                7,343,550
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,125,862
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                934,912
<INCOME-TAX>                                   364,616
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            570,296
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   570,296
<EPS-BASIC>                                     3.13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     3.13


</TABLE>
No. 54875.

#### Abouchar & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 156162-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

It was stipulated that the Federal Reserve bank certified dual rates of exchange for the currencies involved in the liquidation of the entries for the dates of exportation of the merchandise covered by the entries and that the circumstances relating to the liquidation of the said entries are similar in all material respects to those in Abstract 54732. In view of this stipulation and following the cited decision it was held that the currencies of the invoices covered by certain enumerated entries should have been converted in the manner directed by the judgment of this court in said Abstract 54732, in accordance with Bureau of Customs Circular Letter No. 2675, dated October 19, 1949.
# C_2016222EN.01003801.xml

| 20.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 222/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 222/38

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (3rd Chamber) of 12 May 2016 — FS v EESC

(Case F-102/15) (1)

((Civil service - Temporary staff - Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights - Right of every person to have access to his or her file - Access to documents concerning an attempt at mediation - Attempt at mediation initiated by the current president of the EESC and conducted under the auspices of a former president of the EESC - Right of access to the report drawn up at the end of the mediation procedure - Administrative investigation opened after the mediation procedure - Article 3 of Annex IX to the Staff Regulations))

(2016/C 222/49)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: FS (represented by: L. Levi and A. Tymen, lawyers)

Defendant: European Economic and Social Committee (represented by: K. Gambino, X. Chamodraka, M. Pascua Mateo, A. Carvajal and L. Camarena Januzec, Agents, and B. Wägenbaur, lawyer)

Re:

Application for annulment of the decisions of the EESC rejecting the application for access to documents made by the applicant and an application for compensation in respect of the non-material harm allegedly incurred.

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of 19 November 2014 of the president of the European Economic and Social Committee (EESC) in so far as it notifies the refusal to communicate to FS a report concerning her, drawn up by a former president of the EESC at the request of the current president of the EESC; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of 19 November 2014 of the president of the European Economic and Social Committee (EESC) in so far as it notifies the refusal to communicate to FS a report concerning her, drawn up by a former president of the EESC at the request of the current president of the EESC;

| 2. | Declares the claims for annulment to be redundant as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Declares the claims for annulment to be redundant as to the remainder;

| 3. | Orders the European Economic and Social Committee to pay FS a sum of EUR 1 000 by way of compensation for the non-material harm she has suffered; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the European Economic and Social Committee to pay FS a sum of EUR 1 000 by way of compensation for the non-material harm she has suffered;

| 4. | Declares that the European Economic and Social Committee is to bear its own costs and orders it to pay the costs incurred by FS. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Declares that the European Economic and Social Committee is to bear its own costs and orders it to pay the costs incurred by FS.

---

(1)  OJ C 302, 14/9/2015, p. 70.

---