alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 58 

Supporting ‘‘Lights On Afterschool!’’, a national celebration of after school 

programs. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 7 (legislative day, OCTOBER 6), 2005 

Mr. DODD (for himself, Mr. ENSIGN, Mrs. BOXER, Ms. COLLINS, Mr. AKAKA, 

Mr. BURNS, Mr. BURR, Ms. CANTWELL, Mr. CARPER, Mrs. CLINTON, 

Mr. CORNYN, Mr. CORZINE, Mr. DAYTON, Mr. DURBIN, Mr. FEINGOLD, 

Mrs. FEINSTEIN, Mr. KERRY, Mr. KOHL, Ms. LANDRIEU, Mr. LAUTENBERG, Mr. LEVIN, Mr. LIEBERMAN, Ms. MIKULSKI, Ms. MURKOWSKI, 

Mrs. MURRAY, Mr. NELSON of Nebraska, Mr. REID, Mr. SALAZAR, Ms. 

SNOWE, Mr. SPECTER, and Ms. STABENOW) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Supporting ‘‘Lights On Afterschool!’’, a national celebration 

of after school programs. 

Whereas high quality after school programs provide safe, 

challenging, engaging, and fun learning experiences to 

help children and youth develop their social, emotional, 

physical, cultural, and academic skills; 

Whereas high quality after school programs support working 

families by ensuring that the children in such families are 

safe and productive after the regular school day ends; 
2 

•SCON 58 IS

Whereas high quality after school programs build stronger 

communities by involving the Nation’s students, parents, 

business leaders, and adult volunteers in the lives of the 

Nation’s youth, thereby promoting positive relationships 

among children, youth, families, and adults; 

Whereas high quality after school programs engage families, 

schools, and diverse community partners in advancing the 

well-being of the Nation’s children; 

Whereas ‘‘Lights On Afterschool!’’, a national celebration of 

after school programs held on October 20, 2005, promotes the critical importance of high quality after school 

programs in the lives of children, their families, and their 

communities; 

Whereas more than 28,000,000 children in the United States 

have parents who work outside the home and 14,300,000 

children in the United States have no place to go after 

school; and 

Whereas many after school programs across the United 

States are struggling to keep their doors open and their 

lights on: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives 

2 concurring), That Congress supports the goals and ideals 

3 of ‘‘Lights On Afterschool!’’ a national celebration of after 

4 school programs. 

Æ
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

September 26, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
130934 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 130934 COA: 263912 Wayne CC: 91-003903-01 FLOYD JENNINGS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the March 16, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, a nd it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishi ng entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).

s0918 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 26, 2006

Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
The  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information   extracted  from  the
registrant's  financial  statements  as of and for the six  month  period  ended
October 2, 1999, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements:
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                 OCT-02-1999
<CASH>                                            664,748
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                           0
<ALLOWANCES>                                            0
<INVENTORY>                                     2,265,410
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                3,146,679
<PP&E>                                          3,094,950
<DEPRECIATION>                                  1,860,869
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  4,613,826
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           2,801,680
<BONDS>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                          153,175
<OTHER-SE>                                      1,129,141
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    4,613,826
<SALES>                                         7,084,201
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                7,084,201
<CGS>                                           4,134,672
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   4,134,672
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                3,536,509
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 28,705
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (537,753)
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (537,753)
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (537,753)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      (0.04)


</TABLE>
JTED TATE E RO MENTAL PROTECTIO AGE CY

RE I 8 2012 J 28 I: f

1595 WYNKOOP STREET

D j j R, 0202-112

Phone 800-227-8917

http://www.cpa.go /rcgion08

DO KE 0.: CAA-08-2011-0022

I H! M TTE OF:

WP E ER YWlLLl 0 LL.

flk/a DAKOTA-3 E& P COMPANY)

R pondent

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

RDER RANT) ILl

OF AMENDED

ADMlNl TRATIVE OMPLAl TAD

CO E T AGREEME T AND

Fl ORD ~R

On Jun 21,2012, the Parti file a 'Joint Motion to Amend Admini trativ omplaint and

Consent Agreement.' The motion requests revision and amendments to the Agreement as well

a ub titutions and amendment of Emission Sources listed.in App ndix A abIes A-2 through

1\-4 and ne Tabl A-5. Th se r i ior cau d an in r 000 du within 30

alendar day' from the date of lhi rd r.

The Respondent is hereby ORDERED to comply with the terms ofthe Amended Agreement,

effective immediately upon rec ipl by Respondent oftb.is Amended Consent Agreement and

'ina! rde...

o ORDEllliD TID _--=-__ Da of~..::::t:::.~~::::..::=--- ----,.......-l 2012

Elyana R. utin

Regional Judicial Officer
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies thaI the original Oflhc attached ORDER GRANTING

MOTION TO AMEND CONSENT AGREEMENT AND FINAL ORDER in the matter of

WI'X ENERGY WILLI TON, LLC.; DOCKET NO.: CAA-08-2011-0022, was filed with

the Regional Hearing Clerk on June 28, 2012.

Further, the undersigned certifies that a true and correct copy oCthe document was

delivered to David Rochlin, Senior Enforcement Anonlcy. U. S. EPA - Region 8, 1595

Wynkoop Street, Denver, CO 80202-1129. True and correct copies oflhe aforementioned

documents were placed in the United States moil on June 28, 2012, to:

Lisa A. Decker, Senior Counsel

WPX Energy Williston, LLC.

1001 17'" Street, Suite 1200

Denver, CO 80202

E-mailed to:

EIi""lbe~l Whitsel

U. S. Envirorllllciltal Protection Agency

Cincinnati Finance Center

26 W. Martin Luther King Drive (MS-0002)

Cincinnati, Ohio 45268

JWle 28. 2012 -Jy,~a1tcnde Tina Artemis

Paralegal/Regional Hearing Clerk
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**
MEMORANDUM OPINION
N o. 04

- 18

- 00571

- CR
Jose Juan GARCIA , Appellant

v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee From the 399th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2017CR12538 Honorable Frank J. Castro, Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice Delivered and Filed: October 17, 2018
DIS MISSED Pursuant to a plea

- bargain agreement, Jose Juan Garcia pled guilty to sexual assault of a child and was sentenced to ten years in prison in a ccordance with the terms of his plea

- bargain agreement. On July 11, 2018 , the trial court signed a certification of defendant’s right to appeal stating that this “is a plea

- bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” See T EX
. R.
A PP
. P. 25.2(a)(2). After Garcia filed a notice of appeal, the trial court clerk sent copies of the certification and notice of appeal to this court. See id. 25.2(e). The clerk’s record, which includes the trial court’s Rule 25.2(a)(2) certification, has b een filed. See id. 25.2(d).04

- 18

- 00571

- CR

- 2

- “ In a plea bargain case . . . a defendant may appeal only: (A) those matters that were raised by written motion filed and ruled on before trial, or (B) after getting the trial court’s permission to appeal.” Id. 25.2(a)(2). The clerk’s record, which contains a written plea bargain, establishes the punishment assessed by the court does not exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant. See id. The clerk’s record does not include a written motio n filed and ruled upon before trial; nor does it indic ate that the trial court gave Garcia permission to appeal. See id. The trial court’s certification, therefore, appears to accurately reflect that this i s a plea

bargain case and that Garcia does not hav e a right to appeal. We must dismiss an appeal “if a certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record.” Id. 25.2(d). We, therefore, informed Garcia that this appeal would be dismissed pursuant to Texas Ru le of Appellate Procedure 25.2(d), unless an amended trial co urt certification showing that Garcia had the right to appeal was made part of the appellate record. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 25.2(d), 37.1; Daniels v. State , 110 S.W.3d 174 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 200 3, order). No such amended trial court certification has been filed. Therefore, this appeal is dismissed pursuant to Rule 25.2(d).
PER CURIAM
DO NOT PUBLISH
EXHIBIT 10.29.1

First Amendment to Pledge and Security Agreement

---

ThisFirst Amendment to the Pledge and Security Agreement(this "Amendment") is effective as of March 25, 2003, by UNION CARBIDE
CORPORATION, a New York corporation ("Grantor"), in favor of THE DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY, a Delaware corporation ("Lender"), and is made with reference to that certain Pledge and Security Agreement dated
March 25, 2003 (the "Pledge and Security Agreement") between Grantor and Lender. Capitalized terms used in this Amendment, but not defined in this Amendment, are as defined in the Pledge and
Security Agreement.

BACKGROUND

Grantor and Lender desire to amend Section 2.1 of the Pledge and Security Agreement.

AGREEMENT

In consideration of the premises, agreements, provisions, and covenants contained in this Amendment and the Pledge and Security Agreement, the parties now agree
as follows:

49

---

EXHIBIT 10.29.1

First Amendment to Pledge and Security Agreement

---

The
parties agree that this Amendment is effective as of March 25, 2003, and they have caused their authorized representatives to execute this Amendment as dated below.

|GRANTOR:                  |  | LENDER:                                               
|------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------
|UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION |  | THE DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY                              
|By:                       |  | /s/EDWARD W. RICH                                     
|Name:                     |  | Edward W. Rich                                        
|Title:                    |  | Chief Financial Officer, Vice President, and Treasurer
|Date:                     |  | June 16, 2003                                         

50

---

QuickLinks
# C_2016335EN.01001701.xml

| 12.9.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 335/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.9.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 335/17

---

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 30 June 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy dla Wrocławia-Śródmieścia — Poland) — Alicja Sobczyszyn v Szkoła Podstawowa w Rzeplinie

(Case C-178/15) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Organisation of working time - Directive 2003/88/EC - Right to paid annual leave - Teachers - Convalescence leave - Annual leave coinciding with convalescence leave - Right to take the annual leave in another period))

(2016/C 335/22)

Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Referring court

Sąd Rejonowy dla Wrocławia-Śródmieścia

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Alicja Sobczyszyn

Applicant:

Defendant: Szkoła Podstawowa w Rzeplinie

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 7(1) of Directive 2003/88/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 November 2003 concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time must be interpreted as precluding national legislation or a national practice, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, under which a worker who is on convalescence leave, granted in accordance with national law, during the period of annual leave scheduled in the leave roster of the establishment where he is employed may be refused, at the end of his convalescence leave, the right to take his paid annual leave in a subsequent period, provided that the purpose of the right to convalescence leave is different from that of the right to annual leave, a matter which is for the national court to determine.

---

(1)  OJ C 245, 27.7.2015.

1

---
Exhibt
      4.3

     

    REVOLVING
      LOAN AGREEMENT AMENDMENT
      ONE

     

    Amendment
      Date: February
      26, 2007

     

    Amended
      Credit Limit: $15,000.00                

     

    RFG
      Acquisition II Inc., a Delaware corporation, promises to pay RICHARD F. BESTON,
      JR. (“Lender”), an individual, the amended sum of FIFTEEN THOUSAND and 00/100
      DOLLARS ($15,000.00) (the “Amended Credit Limit”) or such other principal amount
      that may be outstanding, in no case to exceed the Amended Credit Limit, as
      evidenced by the books and records of Lender. 

     

    This
      Agreement One hereby amends the Credit Limit as defined in the Revolving Loan
      Agreement, dated November 20, 2006, by and among RFG Acquisition II Inc. and
      Richard F. Beston, Jr. All other terms and conditions of the original Revolving
      Loan Agreement, dated November 20, 2006, remain unchanged and in full force
      and
      effect.

    

      
        	
                RFG
                  Acquisition II Inc.  

                 

                 

              	
                 

              	
                 

              	
                 

              
	
                By:
                  

              	
                /s/ David
                  W. Matre

              	
                 

              	
                 

              	
                Date:
                  February
                  26, 2007

              
	
                 

              	
                David
                  W. Matre

                Chief
                  Financial Officer

              	
                 

              	
                 

              	 
	
                 

              	 	
                 

              	
                 

              	 


      

       

      
        	
                “Lender”   

                 

                 

              	
                 

              	
                 

              	
                 

              
	
                 

              	
                /s/ 
                  Richard F. Beston, Jr.

              	
                 

              	
                 

              	
                Date:
                  February 26, 2007

              
	
                 

              	
                RICHARD
                  F. BESTON, JR., an individual

              	
                 

              	
                 

              	 
	
                 

              	 	
                 

              	
                 

              	 


      

    

    


    


    DO
      NOT DESTROY THIS ORIGINAL AGREEMENT AMENDMENT
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                           7


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1999
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           105,250,512
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                          0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                            0
<EQUITIES>                                     118,500
<MORTGAGE>                                     0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                  0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 105,369,012
<CASH>                                         99,006
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                             2,494,670
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                         4,537,635
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 121,838,147
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                39,409,888
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                            17,680,242
<POLICY-OTHER>                                 2,486,461
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                          0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       3,098,389
<OTHER-SE>                                     51,184,144
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   121,838,147
<PREMIUMS>                                     14,433,733
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                            2,956,990
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                             59,160
<OTHER-INCOME>                                 3,242,581
<BENEFITS>                                     7,478,151
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                    4,273,913
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                           4,057,394
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                4,883,006
<INCOME-TAX>                                   1,416,116
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            3,466,890
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   3,466,890
<EPS-BASIC>                                  0.56
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.55
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                 0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                            0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                              0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                             0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                               0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                        0



</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and § 225.41 of the Board’s Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).

The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for inspection at the office of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later than May 10, 2007.

**A. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco**                     (Tracy Basinger, Director, Regional and Community Bank Group) 101 Market Street, San Francisco, California 94105-1579:                

*1. Frank W. Yuen, Esq, Nassau, Bahamas;*                     to acquire additional voting shares of Concord Place, Inc., Nassau, Bahamas, and thereby indirectly acquire Los Angeles National Bank, Buena Park, California.                

      ( print page 20550)    
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, April 20, 2007.

Jennifer J. Johnson,

Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. E7-7874 Filed 4-24-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**Union Carbide Corporation andSubsidiaries**

** **

** **

** **

**CertificationPursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

 

 

I, Patrick E. Gottschalk, President and Chief Executive Officer ofUnion Carbide Corporation (the “Corporation”), certify that:

 

1.               the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Corporationfor the quarter ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.               the information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Corporation.

 

 

 

 

 

 
| /s/ PATRICK E. GOTTSCHALK             |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|
| Patrick E. Gottschalk                 |   |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |   |
| October 29, 2007                      |   |

 

26

----
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

FRANK MARRERO and IDA MARRERO
, Appellant s ,

v.

CITIZENS PROPERTY INSURANCE CORP.
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 19

- 606

[ February 20, 2020 ]

Appeal of non

- final order from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; David Haimes , Judge; L.T. Case No.

CACE18

- 007706 (08)

.

Geoffrey B. Marks of Billbrough & Marks, P.A., Coral Gables, for appellants.

Scot Samis of Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrews berry LLP, St. Petersburg, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

G ROSS

, M AY and K LINGENSMITH

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.