alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2017030EN.01001202.xml

| 30.1.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 30/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.1.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 30/12

---

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 30 November 2016 — European Commission v French Republic, Orange, Federal Republic of Germany

(Case C-486/15 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - State aid - Financial measures for France Télécom - Shareholder loan offer - Public statements by representatives of the French State - Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the common market - Definition of ‘aid’ - Concept of ‘economic advantage’ - Prudent private investor criterion - Obligation of the General Court to state reasons - Limits of judicial review - Distortion of the decision at issue))

(2017/C 030/12)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Appellant: European Commission (represented by: C. Giolito, B. Stromsky, D. Grespan and T. Rusche, acting as Agents)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: French Republic (represented by: G. de Bergues and D. Colas and by J. Bousin, acting as Agents), Orange, formerly France Télécom (represented by: S. Hautbourg and S. Cochard-Quesson, avocats), Federal Republic of Germany

Other parties to the proceedings:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders the European Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the European Commission to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 381, 16.11.2015.

1

---
<PAGE>   1

                                                                EXHIBIT 10.27(b)

                    [INTROGEN THERAPEUTICS, INC. LETTERHEAD]

                                                                  CERTIFIED MAIL
                                                        RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED

January 28, 2000                                            VIA FAX 510 758-4397


Mr. Paul Hastings
President & COO
Dr. John Statler, Ph.D.
General Manager
LXR Biotechnology, Inc.
3095 Richmond Parkway, Suite 213
Richmond, CA 94806


     Re:   Exercise of Option to Negotiate

Dear Mr. Hastings and Dr. Statler:

Introgen hereby exercises its option to commence good faith negotiations to
enter into a license agreement, as provided for in Article 5 of the Evaluation
and Exclusive Option Agreement, with respect to the BAK technology.

Please advise us who to contact on your side to commence negotiations.  In the
meantime, please feel free to contact me if you have any questions or comments.

Very truly yours,

/s/ DAVID L. PARKER/CPL

David L. Parker
V.P., Intellectual Property

Cc: David Nance
    Dr. Mahendra Shah
SAT Report

PMN Number: P-13-0800

SAT Date: 8/16/2013

Print Date: 9/30/2013

Related cases:

Health related cases: 

Ecotox related cases: Analogs: 

Concern levels:

Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments

Level of Concern: 1 3 Health: ; Eco: chronic concerns only

 Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments

2 11

Exposure Based Review:

Health:

Ecotox: No

Routes of exposure: Health: No exposures needed

Ecotox:

Fate: ;

Keywords:

 Keywords: AQUATOX

Summary of Assessment:

 Fate:

Fate Summary: P-13-0800

FATE: 

log Koc = 4.73 (E)

log Fish BCF = 2.38 (E)

log Fish BAF = 1.10 (E) 
POTW removal (%) = 35 via sorption

Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg ≥ mo

Sorption to soils/sediments = strong - v.strong

PBT Potential: P2B1

*CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = negl

 Health:

 Health Summary: Not absorbed through the skin as the neat material; poor

absorption through the skin if in solution; moderate absorption from the lung and GI tract 

(pchem). No significant health concerns.

 Ecotox:

Test Organism Test 

Type

Test End 

Point

Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 *

daphnid 48-h LC50 *

green algal 96-h EC50 *

fish _ chronic value 0.024

daphnid _ chronic 

value

*

algal _ chronic 

value

*

Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50 _

Sewage Sludge _ Chronic 

Value

_

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for ; SAR chemical class = 

; MW 

(P); effective concentrations based on 100% active ingredients and mean measured 

concentrations; hardness <150.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and TOC <2.0 mg/L;

Factors Values Comments

Assessment Factor 10

Concentration of Concern 

(ppb)

2

SARs

SAR Class

Ecotox Category None

Ecotox Factors Comments: 

 SAT Chair: L Keifer 564-8916
No. 65705.

#### Arnart Imports, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 59/26714, 59/28236, and 59/26715 (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of figures similar in all material respects to those passed upon in *Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp.*v. *United States*(39 C.C.P.A. 15, C.A.D. 458), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
# C_2016078EN.01001802.xml

| 29.2.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 78/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.2.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 78/18

---

Judgment of the General Court of 14 January 2016 — Coedo Suárez v Council

(Case T-297/15 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - Civil Service - Officials - Disciplinary measures - Removal from post and reduction of the invalidity allowance - Dismissal of the action at first instance - Error of law - Duty to state reasons))

(2016/C 078/28)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Ángel Coedo Suárez (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: S. Rodrigues and C. Bernard-Glanz, lawyers)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bauer and M. Veiga, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal lodged against the judgment of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 26 March 2015 in Coedo Suárez v Council (F-38/14, ECR-SC, EU:F:2015:25), seeking to have that judgment set aside.

Coedo Suárez

Council

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Sets aside the judgment of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 26 March 2015 in Coedo Suárez v Council (F-38/14) in so far as it rejects the second complaint of the first plea in law raised at first instance, concerning the assessment of the mitigating circumstances; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Sets aside the judgment of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 26 March 2015 in Coedo Suárez v Council (F-38/14) in so far as it rejects the second complaint of the first plea in law raised at first instance, concerning the assessment of the mitigating circumstances;

| 2. | Dismisses the action brought by Mr Ángel Coedo Suárez before the Civil Service Tribunal in Case F-38/14; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the action brought by Mr Ángel Coedo Suárez before the Civil Service Tribunal in Case F-38/14;

| 3. | Orders Mr Coedo Suárez to pay the costs of the proceedings before the Civil Service Tribunal and, in addition to bearing his own costs, to pay half of the costs incurred by the Council of the European Union in the present proceedings; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Mr Coedo Suárez to pay the costs of the proceedings before the Civil Service Tribunal and, in addition to bearing his own costs, to pay half of the costs incurred by the Council of the European Union in the present proceedings;

| 4. | Orders the Council of the European Union to bear half of its own costs of the present proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders the Council of the European Union to bear half of its own costs of the present proceedings.

---

(1)  OJ C 245, 27.7.2015.

1

---
# C_2016462EN.01001802.xml

| 12.12.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 462/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.12.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 462/18

---

Judgment of the General Court of 26 October 2016 — Kaddour v Council

(Case T-155/15) (1)

1

((Common Foreign and Security Policy - Restrictive measures taken against Syria - Freezing of funds - Annulment of prior measures by a judgment of the General Court - New measures including the applicant's name on the lists - Action for annulment - Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure - Content of the application - Admissibility - Obligation to state reasons - Burden of proof - Right to property - Freedom to conduct a business))

(2016/C 462/22)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Khaled Kaddour (Damascus, Syria) (represented: initially by A. Boesch, D. Amaudruz, M. Ponsard, lawyers, V. Davies, Solicitor, and T. Eicke, QC, then by V. Davies, T. Eicke and V. Wilkinson, Solicitor)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: G. Étienne and S. Kyriakopoulou, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought on the basis of Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of Council Implementing Decision 2015/117/CFSP of 26 January 2015 implementing Decision 2013/255/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Syria (OJ 2015, L 20, p. 85), and of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/108 of 26 January 2015 implementing Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria (OJ 2015, L 20, p. 2), in so far as the name of the applicant is included in the list of persons and entities subject to the restrictive measures.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1) | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1)

Dismisses the action;

| 2) | Orders Mr Khaled Kaddour to bear his own costs and those incurred by the Council of the European Union in the context of the present proceedings and the proceedings for an interim order. |
| --- | --- |

2)

Orders Mr Khaled Kaddour to bear his own costs and those incurred by the Council of the European Union in the context of the present proceedings and the proceedings for an interim order.

---

(1)  OJ C 190, 8.6.2015.

1

---
Before the First Division,

March 11, 1943

No. 48087.

#### Protest 58025-K of Strauss-Eckardt Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

It appeared that, through oversight,' no items were marked on the invoice in entry 752585 as dutiable under paragraph 1541. That having now been done, the claim at 40 percent under paragraph 1541 was sustained as to the items covered by said entry.
No. 56168.

protests 173660-K, etc. (New York).

#### H. Bendel, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

The protests were dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                      5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
COMPANY'S  FORM 10-Q FOR YEAR ENDED  APRIL  30, 1999 AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                       APR-30-1999
<CASH>                                               2,024,159
<SECURITIES>                                                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        4,315,276
<ALLOWANCES>                                            90,249
<INVENTORY>                                          4,544,982
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    11,562,536
<PP&E>                                              17,561,780
<DEPRECIATION>                                      10,034,797
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      23,223,791
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                3,013,706
<BONDS>                                                      0
<PREFERRED>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                        0
<COMMON>                                               430,036
<OTHER-SE>                                          15,922,882
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        23,223,791
<SALES>                                              9,666,150
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     9,666,150
<CGS>                                                6,093,106
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        8,712,707
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                             0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      81,855
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        871,588
<INCOME-TAX>                                           324,800
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    546,788
<DISCONTINUED>                                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                              0
<CHANGES>                                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                                           546,788
<EPS-BASIC>                                              .13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                              .13


</TABLE>
# C_2016279EN.01000701.xml

| 1.8.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 279/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.8.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 279/7

---

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 14 April 2016 — John Dalli v European Commission

(Case C-394/15 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - OLAF investigation report concerning a Member of the European Commission - Alleged oral decision of the President of the Commission to terminate the term of office of the Commissioner concerned - Action for annulment and compensation))

(2016/C 279/10)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Appellant: John Dalli (represented by: L. Levi and S. Rodrigues, avocats)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: J. Baquero Cruz, B. Smulders and J.-P. Keppenne, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

| 2. | Mr John Dalli is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Mr John Dalli is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 311, 21.9.2015.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
The  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information   extracted  from  the
registrant's  financial  statements  as of and for the three month  period ended
June 28, 1997,  and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such  financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                     APR-03-1999
<PERIOD-END>                          JUN-27-1998
<CASH>                                    696,494
<SECURITIES>                            1,048,035
<RECEIVABLES>                                   0
<ALLOWANCES>                                    0
<INVENTORY>                             2,535,148
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        4,586,441
<PP&E>                                  3,474,799
<DEPRECIATION>                          2,028,861
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          6,267,173
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   3,524,431
<BONDS>                                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           0
<PREFERRED>                                     0
<COMMON>                                  153,175
<OTHER-SE>                              1,964,263
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            6,267,173
<SALES>                                 3,869,760
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        3,869,760
<CGS>                                   2,318,804
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           2,318,804
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        1,900,256
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         29,816
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          (349,315)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      (349,315)
<DISCONTINUED>                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 0
<CHANGES>                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                             (349,315)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                (.03)
                                


</TABLE>
(logo)****CURCIO

+COHEN

 

 

**Report of IndependentRegistered Public Accounting Firm**

 

Managing Member

Park Bridge Lender ServicesLLC

New York, NY

 

 

We have examinedmanagement’s assertion, included in the accompanying Management’sReport on Assessment of 2016 Compliance by Park Bridge Lender Services LLC withRegulation AB Servicing Criteria (“Management’s Report”),that Park Bridge Lender Services LLC (the “Company”) complied withthe servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the U.S. Securities andExchange Commission’s Regulation AB as of and for the year ended December31, 2016, excluding those criteria noted as not applicable (N/A) within ExhibitB to Management’s Report. The transactions covered by this report areonly those transactions processed by the Company in its capacity as trustadvisor or operating advisor for the asset backed securities transactions (the“Platform”) identified in Management’s Report. ReferenceExhibit A to Management’s Report for the transactions covered by thisexamination. Management is responsible for the Company’s compliance withthe applicable servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinionon management’s assertion based on our examination.

 

Our examination was conductedin accordance with attestation standards of the Public Company AccountingOversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a testbasis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the applicableservicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessaryin the circumstances. Our examination included testing of a selected sample ofthe servicing activities related to the Platform, determining whether theCompany performed those selected activities in compliance with the applicableservicing criteria during the specified period. Our procedures were limited tothe selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Companyduring the period covered by this report. Our examination was not designed todetect material noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred priorto or subsequent to our tests, that may have affected the Company’sservicing activities during the period covered by this report. We believe thatour examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examinationdoes not provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance withthe applicable servicing criteria.

 

In our opinion,management’s assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned applicableservicing criteria identified in Exhibit B to Management’s Report withrespect to the transactions identified in Exhibit A to Management’sReport as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016, for the Platform, isfairly stated in all material aspects.

 

 

/s/ Curcio & Cohen,CPA’s, P.C.

 

 

New York, NY

February 2, 2017

 

 

CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTSPC 7 PENN PLAZA, SUITE 1500 NEW YORK NY 10001

TEL: 212 557-9800  FAX:212 557 9819   WEBSITE: WWW.CWCCPAFIRM.COM
EXHIBIT 32.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Trinity Learning Corporation (the "Company")
Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Douglas D. Cole, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date:  November 18, 2004

                                              /S/ DOUGLAS D. COLE
                                              -------------------
                                              Douglas D. Cole
                                              Chief Executive Officer


     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
     been provided to Trinity Learning Corporation and will be retained by it
     and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
     request.
# C_2016222EN.01003503.xml

| 20.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 222/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 222/35

---

Order of the General Court of 3 May 2016 — Lions Gate Entertainment v EUIPO (DIRTY DANCING)

(Case T-179/15) (1)

(2016/C 222/45)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Fourth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 190, 8.6.2015.

---
(logo)CWCapital

ASSETMANAGEMENT

** **

** **

**Annual Statement asto Compliance**

**For the Period ofJanuary 1, 2018 to December 31, 2018**

 

 

**MSC 2016-UBS9**

 

 

Inaccordance with the requirements detailed in §11.09 of the Pooling andServicing Agreement (the “Agreement”) for the above-mentioned CMBS pool,CWCapital Asset Management LLC (“CWCAM”), in its capacity as SpecialServicer, is providing this Officer’s Certificate with respect to thefollowing:

 

(A)      a review of CWCAM’s activities during the preceding calendar year or portionthereof (the "Reporting Period") and of CWCAM’s performanceunder the Agreement has been made under such officer’s supervision;

 

(B)      to the best of such officer’s knowledge, based on such review, CWCAM hasfulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement in all material respectsthroughout the Reporting Period.

 

Shouldyou have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us.

 

Sincerely,

CWCapitalAsset Management LLC

/s/James P. Shevlin

JamesP. Shevlin 

President/ChiefOperating Officer

 

 

7501Wisconsin Avenue | Suite 500 West | Bethesda, MD | 20814
No. 64348.

protests 275712-K, etc. (New York).

#### Columbus Combined Floor Polishers & Cleaners, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of electrical floor polishers similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Electrolux Corporation*(46 C.C.P.A. 143, O.A.D. 718), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 1 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 1

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),  
That pursuant to clause 4, section 5, article I of the Constitution, 
during the One Hundred Tenth Congress the Speaker of the House and the 
Majority Leader of the Senate or their respective designees, acting 
jointly after consultation with the Minority Leader of the House

 and the Minority Leader of the Senate, may notify the Members of the 
House and the Senate, respectively, to assemble at a place outside the 
District of Columbia if, in their opinion, the public interest shall 
warrant it.

            Passed the House of Representatives January 4, 2007.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
110th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                             H. CON. RES. 1

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

     Regarding consent to assemble outside the seat of government.
```