alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 496 

Commending the Kansas City Kansas Community College Debate Team for 

their National Championship victories. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 26, 2006 

Mr. BROWNBACK (for himself and Mr. ROBERTS) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Commending the Kansas City Kansas Community College 

Debate Team for their National Championship victories. 

Whereas, in 2006, the Kansas City Kansas Community College debate team won, for a third consecutive year, the 

3 national championships in collegiate debate among 

community colleges; 

Whereas the team won a third consecutive national championship at the Phi Rho Pi national tournament for community colleges in 2006; 

Whereas, at the 2006 Phi Rho Pi national tournament for 

community colleges, the team achieved more debate victories per tournament than any other team in the esteemed history of the tournament; 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 496 ATS

Whereas the team won championship awards in the Policy 

Team Debate, Lincoln-Douglas Debate, and Overall 

Sweepstakes at the Phi Rho Pi national tournament for 

community colleges in 2006; 

Whereas the team won a third consecutive national championship for community colleges at the Cross Examination Debate Association National Tournament in 2006; 

and 

Whereas the State of Kansas is privileged to benefit from the 

dedication to education and intercollegiate debate of Kansas City Kansas Community College team head coach 

Darren Elliot, assistant coaches Skippy Flynn and Adrian Self, and team members Ashley-Michelle Bruce, Ryan 

Coyne, Clay Crockett, Peter Lawson, Candace Moore, 

Amanda Montee, Deandre Tolbert, and Garrett Tuck: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) commends the extraordinary contributions 

3 of the Kansas City Kansas Community College de4 bate team to the city of Kansas City, Kansas, and 

5 the State of Kansas; 

6 (2) congratulates the team for their national 

7 championship victories; and 

8 (3) offers its best wishes to the team for future 

9 success. 

Æ 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32b

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Twin Disc, Incorporated (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ending March 28, 2008,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as of the date hereof (the Report), I, Christopher J. Eperjesy, Vice President  Finance, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and                   
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|   

/s/ CHRISTOPHER J. EPERJESYChristopher J. EperjesyVice President  Finance, Chief FinancialOfficer and Treasurer

May 7, 2008

---
# Official Journal C 125A/6 Ju

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 125A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 506 June 2007 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 125A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 506 June 2007

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | |
| 2007/C 125A/01 | NOTICE TO READERS | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

2007/C 125A/01

NOTICE TO READERS

1

---

| | Corrigenda |
| --- | --- |
| 2007/C 125A/02 | Corrigendum to notice of open competition EPSO/AST/29/06, to constitute a reserve of Assistants having as their main language English (EN) in the secretarial field (OJ C 173 A of 26.7.2006) | 3 |

Corrigenda

2007/C 125A/02

Corrigendum to notice of open competition EPSO/AST/29/06, to constitute a reserve of Assistants having as their main language English (EN) in the secretarial field (OJ C 173 A of 26.7.2006)

3

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
SERVED: JULY 14,2011 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC . 

IN THE MATTER OF 

DIAMOND AIR CHARTER, INC. 

• FAA DOCKET NO. CPI0EA0004 

(Civil Penally Action) 

FDMS NO. FAA-2010-0620 

DEPARTMENT OF 

TR/•ANSPORTATiO ^ N 

POCKET OPERATIONS 

20!! .JUL |L| P 9: iU 

ORDER I^ASSIGNING PROCEEDING 

In ihc interest of judicial efficiency, the above-caplioned proceeding is reassigned from 

Chief Administrative Law Judge Ronnie A. Yodcr to Administrative Law Judge Jcslyn E. 

Sullivan. All future pleadings and other communications regarding this proceeding shall be 

served on the Judge, the FAA Hearing Docket, and the other persons on the attached Service 

List. 

SO ORDERED. 

Lonnie A. Y 

Chief Administrati 

Attachment- Service List 
FAA Docket No. CPIOEA0004 

(Civil Penally Action) 

REVISED SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building - Suile 2W1000' 

ONE COPY 

Gregory S. Winlon, Respondent s Counsel 

Aviation Law Experts, LLC 

One Research Court, Suite 450 

Rockvillc,MD 20850 

TEL; 301-294-8550 

FAX: 301-294-2525 

Zachary M. Berman, Complainant's Counsel 

AUoniey, OfUcc of the Regional Counsel, AEA-7 

Eastern Region 

Federal Aviation Administration 

1 Aviation Plaza. Room 561 

Jamaica, NY 11434 

TEL: 718-553-3258 

FAX: 718-995-5699 

The Honorable Jcslyn E. Sullivan, • 

Administrative Law Judge 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Office of Hearings, M-20, Room El 2-320 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2132 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

' Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by cxpediled courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building - Suite 2W1000. Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk. AGC-430. 

- 2 -
Case: 2:12-cv-01135-JLG-NMK Doc #: 12 Filed: 08/20/13 Page: 1 of 1  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-11T21:31:22-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

October 17, 2018

No. 04-18-00496-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF M.A.S.L. AND K.J.L., CHILDREN,

From the 45th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017-PA-01773

Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The Appellee’s Motion for Extension of Time to File State’s Brief is hereby GRANTED. 

Time is extended to October 18, 2018.

_________________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 17th day of October, 2018.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
69–008 

110TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 2d Session 110–612 

PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF THE SENATE 

AMENDMENT TO THE BILL (H.R. 493) TO PROHIBIT DISCRIMINATION ON THE BASIS OF GENETIC INFORMATION WITH RESPECT TO HEALTH INSURANCE AND EMPLOYMENT 

APRIL 29, 2008.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

Mrs. SLAUGHTER, from the Committee on Rules, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany H. Res. 1156] 

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House 

Resolution 1156, by a non-record vote, report the same to the 

House with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted. 

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution provides for the consideration of the Senate 

amendment to H.R. 493, the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2007. The resolution makes in order a motion by the 

Chairman of the Committee on Education and Labor to concur in 

the Senate amendment. The resolution waives all points of order 

against the motion except clause 10 of rule XXI. The resolution provides that the Senate amendment and the motion shall be considered as read. The resolution provides one hour of debate on the motion with 20 minutes equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on Education 

and Labor; 20 minutes equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on Energy 

and Commerce; and 20 minutes equally divided and controlled by 

the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on 

Ways and Means. The resolution further provides that the Chair 

may postpone further consideration of the motion to a time designated by the Speaker. 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with HEARING
2 

EXPLANATION OF WAIVERS

The waiver of all points of order against consideration of the motion includes a waiver of clause 4 of rule XXI prohibiting appropriations in legislative bills and a waiver of Section 303(a) of the Congressional Budget Act, prohibiting consideration of legislation, as 

reported, providing new budget authority, change in revenues, 

change in public debt, new entitlement authority, or new credit authority for a fiscal year until the budget resolution for that year 

has been agreed to. 

Æ 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with HEARING
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-28-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-27-1998
<CASH>                                            7399
<SECURITIES>                                     25269
<RECEIVABLES>                                    12050
<ALLOWANCES>                                       662
<INVENTORY>                                       3048
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 58933
<PP&E>                                           67487
<DEPRECIATION>                                   47849
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  108071
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            16602
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           120
<OTHER-SE>                                       54373
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    108071
<SALES>                                          14023
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 14023
<CGS>                                            15288
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    21775
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   6
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1846)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (1846)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1846)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.19)
        

</TABLE>
# C_2016007EN.01003701.xml

| 11.1.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 7/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.1.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 7/37

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 17 November 2015 — Ayres de Abreu v EESC

(Case F-90/15)

((Civil Service - Manifest inadmissibility - Representation by a lawyer - Applicant being a lawyer - Impossible for an applicant to be represented by a lawyer who is not a third party))

(2016/C 007/49)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Antonio Ayres de Abreu (Cascais, Portugal)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Economic and Social Committee

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of the decision not to allow the applicant to retire.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.

| 2. | Mr Ayres de Abreu shall bear his own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Mr Ayres de Abreu shall bear his own costs.

---
EXHIBIT 4.1
DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES
The following description of the terms of Sunrise Real Estate Group, Inc.’s (“we”, “us”, “our”, or the “Company”) capital stock is a summary only and is qualified by reference to the relevant provisions of Texas law and our Articles of Incorporation, including Articles of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation, and by-laws.
Authorized Capital Stock
Under our Articles of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation, our authorized capital stock consists of two hundred million (200,000,000) shares of common stock, with $0.01 par value, and one million (1,000,000) shares of preferred stock, with $0.01 par value.
Description of Common Stock
Voting Rights. Each holder of our common stock is entitled to one vote for each share of our common stock held of record on the applicable record date on all matters submitted to a vote of shareholders. Shareholders of common stock can use cumulative voting to aggregate director votes.
Dividend Rights. Holders of our common stock are entitled to receive such dividends as may be declared from time to time by our board of directors out of funds legally available therefor, subject to any preferential dividend rights granted to the holders of any outstanding our preferred stock.
Rights upon Liquidation. Holders of our common stock are entitled to share pro rata, upon any liquidation, dissolution or winding up of us, in all remaining assets available for distribution to shareholders after payment of or provision for our liabilities and the liquidation preference of any outstanding our preferred stock.
Preemptive Rights. Holders of our common stock have no preemptive rights to purchase, subscribe for or otherwise acquire any unissued or treasury shares or other securities.
Description of Preferred Stock
Preferred Stock Outstanding. As of the date of this filing, no shares of our preferred stock were issued and outstanding.
Designation and Amount. Shares of Preferred Stock may be issued from time to time in one or more series, each such series to have such designations as may be fixed by the Board of Directors prior to the issuance of any shares thereof.
Dividend Rights. Holders of our Preferred Stock may be entitled to receive dividends (which may be cumulative or noncumulative) as may be declared from time to time by our board of directors out of funds legally available therefor.
# Official Journal C 433/2021

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 433 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6426 October 2021 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 433

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6426 October 2021

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2021/C 433/01 | Communication from the Commission – Approval of the content of a draft for a Commission Regulation amending Regulation (EU) No 651/2014 declaring certain categories of aid compatible with the internal market in application of Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty | 1 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2021/C 433/01

Communication from the Commission – Approval of the content of a draft for a Commission Regulation amending Regulation (EU) No 651/2014 declaring certain categories of aid compatible with the internal market in application of Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
# C_2015118EN.01004601.xml

| 13.4.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 118/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.4.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 118/46

---

Action brought on 23 January 2015 — ZZ v EMA

(Case F-9/15)

(2015/C 118/58)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: J.-N. Louis, R. Metz, N. de Montigny, D. Verbeke and T. Van Lysbeth)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Medicines Agency (EMA)

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

The annulment of the decision of the European Medicines Agency (EMA) to suspend the applicant from his duties and an application for the payment of one euro as provisional compensation in respect of the material and non-material harm allegedly suffered.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Tribunal should:

| — | annul the decision of the EMA of 31 March 2014 to place the applicant on ‘non-active status’ for an indefinite period; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the EMA of 31 March 2014 to place the applicant on ‘non-active status’ for an indefinite period;

| — | order the defendant to pay the applicant one euro as provisional compensation in respect of the material and non-material harm suffered; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the applicant one euro as provisional compensation in respect of the material and non-material harm suffered;

| — | order the EMA to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the EMA to pay the costs.

---
Puget Sound Air Pollution 

Control Agency 

HEREBY ISSUES AN ORDER OF APPROVAL 

TO CONSTRUCT, INSTALL, OR ESTABLISH 

Holnam Inc. (Cement Plant) Main Stack Opacity Stand&.rd. 

NICHOLAS F. STIREN 

A 

p BOLNAM, INC., IDEAL DIVISION 

p 

I:. 5400 W MARGINAL WY SW 

I 

o BOLNAM, INC., IDEAL DIVISION 

w 

N 5400 W MARGINAL WY SW 

B 

Regi~on No; 14046 

Notice of 

Construction No. 5183 

fF"'' ... . _a ') Date · · 

C SEATrLE WA 98106-159!) R SEATrLE WA 98106-15!1!) 

A 

N 

T 

INSTALLATION ADDRESS 

BOLNAM,INC., IDEAL DMSION, 5400 W MARGINAL WY SW, SEATrLE, WA, 98106 

THIS ORDBR IS ISSUBD SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING RESTRICTIONS AND CONDmONS 

I. Approval is hereby granted as provided in Article 6 of Regulation I of the Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Agency to the applicant to illlltall or 

establish the equipment, device or process described hereon at the INSTALLATION ADDRESS in accordance with the plans and specifications on file in 

the Engineering Division of PSAPCA. · 

2. Compliance with this ORDBR and its conditions does not relieve the owner or opemtor from the respons~"bility of compliance with RegulatioiiS I, D or m, 

RCW 70.94 or any other emission control requirements, nor from the resulting liabilities and/or legal remedies for fililure to comply. Section S.OS(e) of 

Regulation I requires that the owner or operator must develop and implement an operation and msintensnce (O&M) plan to assure continuous compliance 

with Regulations I, D, and m. 

3. This approval daes not relieVe the applicant or owner of any requirement of any other g(>vernmental agency. 

4. It shall be unlawful for Holnam, Inc. to cause or allow the emission of any air contamill1lllt from the kiln main exhaust stack that is 

greater than 12% opacity for a I -hour average in accordance with the provisions of Article 12 of Regulation I. 

5. Holnam, Inc. shall submit annual source test reports to the Agency to verify this 1-hour opacitY standard demonstrates continuous 

compliance with Section 9.09(a) of Regulation I. · 

6. This Order of Approval does not relieve Holnam, Inc. from the requirements of Regulation I, Section 9.03. 

7. Holnsm shall follow the procedures in Assurance ofDiscontinuaJlCO Agreement dated July 13, 1993 (which shell terminate on June 30, 

1995), snd WAC 173-400-107 for opacity and particulate violations caused by excess emissions. 

~·~Hcdc~ DluCK L. AUSTIN Ri. JAY M~G & 

Reviewing Engineer • ' Reviewing Engineer 

MEJ 

Fonn 50--118, (1/91) 

L_ ARTHURDAVIDSON 

~- Air Pollution Control Officer
(Reap. Dec. 8299)

#### W. F. Mackay *v.*United States

Entry No. 3381-A.

(Decided April 8, 1954)

*Barnes, Richardson & Colburn*for the plaintiff.

*Warren E. Burger,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliyee, Chief Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED that the appraised value of the merchandise involved in the above-entitled case, less the Canadian Sales Tax of 8% which is included in said appraised value, is equal to the price, at the time of exportation of said merchandise to the United States, at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, and that the foreign value of such or similar merchandise was no higher.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the record in *C. J. Tower & Sons*v. *United States,*Reappraisement Decision 7624, may be incorporated herein.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that this case may be submitted on the foregoing stipulation.

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such value was the appraised value, less 8 per centum Canadian sales tax.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
# C_2015138EN.01002602.xml

| 27.4.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 138/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.4.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 138/26

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší správní soud (Czech Republic) lodged on 13 January 2015 — Odvolací finanční ředitelství v Český Rozhlas

(Case C-11/15)

(2015/C 138/37)

Language of the case: Czech

Referring court

Referring court

Nejvyšší správní soud

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Odvolací finanční ředitelství

Appellant:

Respondent: Český Rozhlas

Respondent:

Question referred

Question referred

Can public sector broadcasting, financed by compulsory statutory charges of the amount set by the law, on the basis of ownership of a radio receiver, possession thereof or entitlement to use it on other legal grounds, be regarded as the ‘provision of a service against payment’ within the meaning of Article 2(1) of the Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC (1) on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment, which must be exempted from VAT in accordance with Article 13A(1)(q) of that directive, or is it a non-economic activity which is not subject to VAT at all under Article 2 of the Sixth Directive, and to which exemption from VAT in accordance with Article 13A(1)(q) of that directive does not therefore apply?

1

---

(1)  OJ 1977 L 145, p. 1.

1

---