alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 56640.

protest 154279-K (Boston).

#### Boruch Fleishman *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In view of the evidence submitted at the trial, it was held that the comb and brush set, the fitted toilet set, and the umbrella are entitled to free entry under the provision in paragraph 1798, *supra, for*personal effects of persons arriving in the United States, necessary and appropriate for the wear and use of such persons and intended for such wear and use, and not for the use of anyone else nor for sale. The wine set and 138 pieces of silver were held free of duty under paragraph 1632 as household effects of persons or families from foreign countries, actually used abroad by them not less than 1 year, and not intended for any other person or persons nor for sale. However, as to the 30 yards of linen, the court found that it was not clear whether or not the character of the linen was such as would bring it under the provision for household effects nor was it established that such article was such personal effects as were necessary and appropriate for the wear and use of the plaintiff. The protest was therefore overruled as to said 30 yards of linen.
AO 450 (Rev. 5/85) Judgment in a Civil Case

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

Eastern Division 

HENRY L. STEPLER,

Plaintiff,

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE

v.

WARDEN, HOCKING CASE NO. C2-12-1209

CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, et al., JUDGE EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR.

MAGISTRATE JUDGE NORAH MCCANN KING

Defendants.

Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues have

been tried and the jury has rendered its verdict.

Decision by Court. A decision has been rendered by the Court without a hearing or trial.

Pursuant to the ORDER filed January 29, 2013, JUDGMENT is hereby entered

DISMISSING this action.

Date: January 29, 2013 JOHN P. HEHMAN, CLERK

/S/ Andy F. Quisumbing 

(By) Andy F. Quisumbing

 Courtroom Deputy Clerk

Case: 2:12-cv-01209-EAS-NMK Doc #: 19 Filed: 01/29/13 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
No. 48730.

Suit 4422.

#### United States v. *Heemsoth-Kerner Corp. (Bauer Type Foundry, Inc.).*

Reap. Dec. 5722 affirmed. C. A. D. 252.
# C_2017221EN.01001802.xml

| 10.7.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 221/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.7.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 221/18

---

Judgment of the General Court of 15 May 2017 — Morton’s of Chicago v EUIPO — Mortons the Restaurant (MORTON’S)

(Case T-223/15) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU figurative mark MORTON’S - Earlier non-registered national trade marks MORTON’S, MORTONS, MORTON’S CLUB, MORTONS CLUB, MORTON’S THE RESTAURANT, MORTONS RESTAURANT and M MORTON’S - Relative ground for refusal - Declaration of invalidity - Article 8(4) and Article 53(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2017/C 221/23)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Morton’s of Chicago, Inc. (Chicago, Illinois, United States) (represented by: J. Moss, Barrister)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: H. O’Neill, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Mortons the Restaurant Ltd (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: J. Barry, Solicitor, and P. Nagpal, Barrister)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 12 February 2015 (Case R 46/2014-1), relating to invalidity proceedings between Mortons The Restaurant and Morton’s of Chicago.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Morton’s of Chicago, Inc. to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Morton’s of Chicago, Inc. to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 228, 13.7.2015.

1

---
Exhibit        32

**UNISOURCE        ENERGY CORPORATION**

**TUCSON        ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY**

**STATEMENTS        OF CORPORATE OFFICERS**

| November                  3,                  2006 |   | /s/                  James S.                  Pignatelli                                                                                                                                                                                                        |
|----------------------------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                               |   | James                  S.                  PignatelliChairman                  of                  the Board, President and Chief                  Executive Officer UniSource                  Energy CorporationTucson                  Electric Power Company |
|                                               |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             |
|                                               |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             |
|                                               |   | /s/                  Kevin P.                  Larson                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
|                                               |   | Kevin                  P.                  LarsonSenior                  Vice                  President, Treasurer and Chief                  Financial Officer UniSource                  Energy CorporationTucson                  Electric Power Company     |
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 9 , 2020 

# Order

Clerk October 9 , 2020

160 740 ( 81 )

DAVID A. MAPLES,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

SC: 160740

v COA: 343394

Ct of Claims: 17

- 000135

- MZ

STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Defendant

- Appellee

. _________________________________________/

By order of the Chief Justice, the motion of plaintiff

- appellant to extend the time

for filing his reply is GRANTED

. The reply submitted on October 2 , 2020 , is accepted for

filing

.
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v WILLIAM L. HANKERSON, Airman Second Class, U. S. Air Force, Appellant

7 USCMA 615, 23 CMR 79

No. 9052

Decided February 21, 1957

*Lieutenant Colonel Stanley S. Butt, Major George M. Wilson*and *Captain Norman J. Nelson*were on the brief for Appellant,-Accused.

*Lieutenant Colonel Francis P. Murray, Major John M. Rankin,*and *Major Fred C. Vowell*were on the brief for Appellee, United States.

*616Opinion of the Court

George W. Latimer, Judge:

Despite his plea to the contrary, the accused was found guilty by general court-martial of the wrongful use of a habit-forming drug and the wrongful possession of marihuana, both in violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 934, and the violation of a general regulation, in violation of Article 92, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 892. He was sentenced to dishonorable discharge, total forfeitures, and confinement for two years. The convening authority approved, the board of review affirmed, and we granted review to determine the adequacy of the staff judge advocate’s review.

This case arose in the same command as did United States v Hammock, 7 USCMA 614, 23 CMR 78, decided this day, and the issue puts in question the official acts of the same staff officers. Subsequent to the time when this petition for review was granted and prior to the hearing before us, the Government filed affidavits by the staff judge advocates who had participated in the review. Acting pursuant to their interpretation of our holding in United States v Schuller, 5 USCMA 101, 17 CMR 101, counsel for the parties at this level have stipulated that the facts set out in the affidavits reflect the true situation and may be considered by us. When the affidavits are considered, it appears that the accused was given not one but two careful reviews by qualified staff judge advocates, and, thus, no error occurred. No other error of importance has been found.

Accordingly, the decision of the board of review is affirmed.

Chief Judge Quinn and Judge Ferguson concur.
No. 50271.

#### Protests 54422-K, etc., of Burmel Handkerchief Corp. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the court found that the facts herein agreed upon were- such as to bring the case within the holding in *John Barr*v. *United States*(11 Cust. Ct. 88, C. D. 801), which record was incorporated herein. (See *John Barr v. United States,*324 U. S. 83, decided February 5, 1945.) In accordance therewith it was held that the currency of the invoices should be converted at the buying rate in the New York market at noon on the day of exportation (the “free” rate of exchange for pounds sterling), as certified by the Federal Reserve bank and set forth by the collector on each of the entries. The protests were sustained to this extent.
Before the Third Division,

September 18, 1941

No. 46332.

#### Petition 6063-R of W. F. Mackay (Pembina).

Opinion by

Kéefe, J.

At the trial it- was established that upon importation of the merchandise the customs broker noted the low value of the merchandise and called it to the attention of the inspector and the appraiser and asked for a special examination which resulted in the report that the merchandise was chaff and not worth anything. In addition to consulting the customs authorities the importer wired the agent in Winnipeg asking him to check the value with the shippers and later received a wire that the value as invoiced was correct. This telegram was admitted in evidence. The importer endeavored to get further information but found the shipper had gone out of business. On the record as presented it was found that in making the entry the petitioner was'without intention tq conceal or misrepresent the facts or to deceive the appraiser. The petition was therefore granted.
1

The Honorable Joan N. Ericksen, United States District Judge for the District

of Minnesota.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 07-3484

___________

Earnest Jesse Richardson, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* District of Minnesota.

Francisco Porras, Officer; Lora Hanks, *

Officer; City of Minneapolis, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellees. *

___________

Submitted: April 3, 2009

Filed: April 7, 2009

___________

Before RILEY, SMITH, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Earnest Jesse Richardson appeals the district court’s1

 adverse grant of summary

judgment in his civil rights action, in which he claimed that he had been the victim of

racial profiling when police officers pursued and arrested him. Upon de novo review,

see Ramlet v. E.F. Johnson Co., 507 F.3d 1149, 1152 (8th Cir. 2007), we hold that

summary judgment was appropriate because Richardson did not offer evidence from

which a jury could find that the officers acted with a discriminatory purpose, see
-2-

Johnson v. Crooks, 326 F.3d 995, 999-1000 (8th Cir. 2003) (Equal Protection Clause

is constitutional basis for objecting to intentionally discriminatory application of laws;

district court erred in not dismissing equal protection claim where plaintiffs failed to

offer evidence that officer did not stop non-African Americans under similar

circumstances, or offer direct evidence of racial animus other than personal opinion);

see also Brockinton v. City of Sherwood, Ark., 503 F.3d 667, 674 (8th Cir. 2007) (for

municipal liability to attach, individual liability must first be found on underlying

substantive claim); Johnson v. Outboard Marine Corp., 172 F.3d 531, 535 (8th Cir.

1999) (this court may affirm on any basis supported by record).

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________
Exhibit 32



Certification Pursuant to

Exchange Act Rule 15d-14(b) and

18 U.S.C. Section 1350

I, Gordon R. Arnold, certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, that:

i.  The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Sierra Monitor Corporation for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009  fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and;

ii. The information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Sierra Monitor Corporation and will be retained by Sierra Monitor Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Date:

May 12, 2009

By:

/s/ Gordon R. Arnold

Gordon R. Arnold

Chief Executive Officer

Chief Financial Officer









Page 20 of 20
# Official Journal L 332/2020

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 332 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6312 October 2020 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 332

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6312 October 2020

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Commission Decision (EU) 2020/1411 of 2 March 2020 on the State aid No C 64/99 (ex NN 68/99) implemented by Italy for the Adriatica, Caremar, Siremar, Saremar and Toremar shipping companies (Tirrenia Group)
  (notified under document C(2020) 1108)

   (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| | * | Commission Decision (EU) 2020/1412 of 2 March 2020 on the measures SA.32014, SA.32015, SA.32016 (11/C) (ex 11/NN) implemented by Italy for Tirrenia di Navigazione and its acquirer Compagnia Italiana di Navigazione
  (notified under document C(2020) 1110)

   (
  1
  ) | 45 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

DECISIONS

*

Commission Decision (EU) 2020/1411 of 2 March 2020 on the State aid No C 64/99 (ex NN 68/99) implemented by Italy for the Adriatica, Caremar, Siremar, Saremar and Toremar shipping companies (Tirrenia Group)
  (notified under document C(2020) 1108)

   (
  1
  )

(notified under document C(2020) 1108)

1

1

*

Commission Decision (EU) 2020/1412 of 2 March 2020 on the measures SA.32014, SA.32015, SA.32016 (11/C) (ex 11/NN) implemented by Italy for Tirrenia di Navigazione and its acquirer Compagnia Italiana di Navigazione
  (notified under document C(2020) 1110)

   (
  1
  )

(notified under document C(2020) 1110)

1

45

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
No. 39050.

#### Protest 836055-G of Kraft-Phenix Cheese Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

On the authority of *Locatelli*v. *United States*(T. D. 48284) the protest was sustained.
# C_2016078EN.01000301.xml

| 29.2.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 78/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.2.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 78/3

---

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 17 December 2015 — Moreda-Riviere Trefilerías, SA (C-53/15 P), Trefilerías Quijano SA, (C-54/15 P), Trenzas y Cables de Acero PSC SL, (C-55/15 P), Global Steel Wire SA (C-56/15 P) v European Commission

(Joined Cases C-53/15 P to C-56/15 P) (1)

1

((Appeals - Competition - European prestressing steel market - Commission decision adjusting the amount of the fines imposed on certain undertakings and fixing a new period for the payment of those fines - Other undertakings whose fines remained unchanged having no interest in bringing proceedings - Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - Appeal manifestly unfounded))

(2016/C 078/03)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Appellants: Moreda-Riviere Trefilerías, SA (C-53/15 P), Trefilerías Quijano SA, (C-54/15 P), Trenzas y Cables de Acero PSC SL, (C-55/15 P), Global Steel Wire SA (C-56/15 P) (represented by: F. González Díaz and A. Tresandi Blanco, abogados)

Appellants:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: C. Urraca Caviedes and F. Castillo de la Torre, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

The Court hereby orders:

| 1. | The appeals are dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeals are dismissed.

| 2. | Moreda-Riviere Trefilerías SA, Trefilerías Quijano SA, Trenzas y Cables de Acero PSC SL and Global Steel Wire SA shall pay the costs of the proceedings in cases C-53/15 P, C-54/15 P, C-55/15 P and C-56/15 P respectively. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Moreda-Riviere Trefilerías SA, Trefilerías Quijano SA, Trenzas y Cables de Acero PSC SL and Global Steel Wire SA shall pay the costs of the proceedings in cases C-53/15 P, C-54/15 P, C-55/15 P and C-56/15 P respectively.

---

(1)  OJ C 118, 13.4.2015

1

---
EXHIBIT
32.2








CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906


OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Unico American Corporation (the "Company") for the period ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Lester A. Aaron, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





1.
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











/s/  Lester A. Aaron


Name:                    Lester A. Aaron


Title:                      Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer


Date:                      August 13, 2009











A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Unico American Corporation, and will
be retained by Unico American Corporation, and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Before the Third Division,

April 17, 1951

No. 55472.

#### Roovers Bros., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 62282-K (S) (New York).

*410Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

It was stipulated that the issue herein is the same in all material respects as that presented in *Mamary Bros., Inc.*v. *United States*(21 Cust. Ct. 135, C. D. 1142). In accordance therewith it was held that the currency of the invoice should be converted at the buying rate in the New York market at noon on the day of exportation (the “free” rate of exchange for pounds sterling), as certified by the Federal Reserve bank and set forth by the collector on the entry.
III 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 80 

Honoring the life of Fern Holland and expressing the deepest condolences 

of the Senate to her family on their loss. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 10, 2005 

Ms. LANDRIEU (for herself, Ms. MURKOWSKI, Mr. SARBANES, and Mrs. CLINTON) submitted the following resolution; which was considered and agreed 

to 

RESOLUTION

Honoring the life of Fern Holland and expressing the deepest 

condolences of the Senate to her family on their loss.

Whereas the Senate remembers with great sadness the murder of Fern Holland near the Iraqi city of Karbala at the 

age of 33 on March 9, 2004; 

Whereas Fern Holland, born in Bluejacket, Oklahoma, on 

August 5, 1970, lived her life committed to creating the 

most equal and just global society possible; 

Whereas Fern Holland graduated with honors in psychology 

at Oklahoma University and actively sought to help the 

world through caring for children dying of nuclear-related 

diseases in Russia and teaching kids in a squatter camp 

in South Africa; 
2

•SRES 80 ATS

Whereas in the spring of 2000, Fern Holland worked for the 

Peace Corps as a human rights legal advisor in West Africa; 

Whereas in 2003, Fern Holland went to investigate alleged 

human rights violations for the American Refugee Committee at a refugee camp in Guinea where she established 

a legal clinic to seek justice for victims of human rights 

violations, and which, at the time of her death in 2004, 

had handled 118 cases on behalf of victims of human 

rights violations; 

Whereas in May 2003, Fern Holland went to Iraq as a 

United States Agency for International Development employee to work for women’s rights; 

Whereas in Iraq, Fern Holland organized human rights 

groups, opened 6 women’s centers in south Baghdad, and 

acted as a strong advocate for Iraqi women’s rights; 

Whereas after Fern Holland’s death, leading feminists issued 

statements praising her work; 

Whereas residents of the refugee camp in Guinea renamed 

the legal clinic Fern Holland established the ‘‘Fern Holland Legal Aid Clinic of Nzerekore’’; 

Whereas the high school Fern Holland attended in Miami, 

Florida observed a moment of silence and then discussed 

a memorial to honor her; 

Whereas the Cherokee Nation honored Fern Holland by passing a resolution saying she ‘‘died as a warrior’’; 

Whereas Fern Holland was posthumously named a Heroic 

Oklahoman on April 7, 2004, by Governor Brad Henry; 

and 
3

•SRES 80 ATS

Whereas Fern Holland devoted her brief life to promoting her 

belief in basic human rights and the rule of law: Now, 

therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) recognizes that, in Fern Holland, the World 

3 has lost one of its most devoted and hard working 

4 human rights activists; 

5 (2) honors Fern Holland in her extreme dedica6 tion to making the world a better place; and 

7 (3) expresses its deep and heartfelt condolences 

8 to the family of Fern Holland on their loss.

Æ