alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Marshall Field & Co. et al. *v.*United States

No. 6728.

Entry Nos. 1492, 766797, etc.

Invoices dated Newmill, Elgin, England, September 30, 1941, etc.

Certified October 7, 1941, etc.

Entered at Chicago, Ill., November 8, 1941, and at New York, N. Y=, June 7, 1946, etc.

(Decided January 9, 1947)

*James W. Bevans*for the plaintiffs.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Tilson, Judge:

The appeals listed in schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, raise the question of the correctness of the action of the appraiser in including as a part of the dutiable values of the merchandise the amount of a so-called British purchase tax. The record upon which these appeals have been submitted establishes that the issues herein are similar in all material respects to the issues involved in *United States*v. *Pitcairn,*C. A. D. 334, and the record in that case has been admitted in evidence in this case.

Upon the established facts and the law applicable thereto, I find and hold the proper dutiable export values of the merchandise covered by these appeals to be the values found by the appraiser, less any amounts added by the importers on entry to meet advances made by the appraiser in similar cases then pending on appeal.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
No. 48729.

Suit 4418.

#### United *States*v. *Rathjen Brothers.*

C. D. 659 reversed. C. A. D. 250.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This Schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
financial statements contained in the body of the accompanying 10Q and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements .
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           7,863
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   35,127
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     30,703
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                81,088
<PP&E>                                         134,147
<DEPRECIATION>                                  93,360
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 159,711
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           33,155
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        14,374
<OTHER-SE>                                      77,525
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   159,711
<SALES>                                        114,093
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               114,571
<CGS>                                           87,122
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  108,482
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    12
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 591
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,486
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,053
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,433
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,433
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .28
        

</TABLE>
----

|   | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;  and |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of United Air      Lines, Inc. |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/      Glenn F. Tilton          |   |
|-----------------------------------|--------|
| Glenn      F. Tilton              |   |
| Chairman and                 |   |
| Chief      Executive Officer      |   |
|                              |   |
|                              |   |
| /s/      Kathryn A. Mikells       |   |
| Kathryn      A. Mikells           |   |
| Executive      Vice President and |   |
| Chief      Financial Officer      |   |

----
2005 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

4-6-2005

Roggio v. Commissioner IRS

Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential

Docket No. 04-2438

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2005

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2005 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"Roggio v. Commissioner IRS" (2005). 2005 Decisions. Paper 1391.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2005/1391
NOT PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

No. 04-2438

Vincent Roggio; Callie Lasch

 Appellants

v.

Commissioner of Internal Revenue

On Appeal from the United States Tax Court

No. 0090-1

Tax Court Judge: Honorable Robert Wherry, Jr.

Submitted Pursuant to Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a)

March 8, 2005

BEFORE: NYGAARD, McKEE & RENDELL, Circuit Judges

(Filed: April 6, 2005)

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Vincent Roggio and Callie Lasch (“Taxpayers”) appeal an Order of the United

States Tax Court in which the court concluded that the Commissioner did not abuse his

discretion in filing a lien on property owned by Taxpayers in an effort to collect a tax

liability for the tax year 2000 that was admittedly due and owing. Taxpayers argue that

their demonstrated good faith, which included entering into an installment plan to

discharge the liability, should have precluded the Commissioner from engaging in what

they refer to as “a very intrusive collection technique.” See Appellants’ brief at 5. We
2

will affirm.

Inasmuch as we write only for the parties who are familiar with the background of

this case, we need not reiterate the factual or procedural history. Appellants have

submitted a brief consisting of two paragraphs of argument, without citation to any legal

authority, in which they argue that, “[i]n a credit-based society, a lien is a very intrusive

collection technique.” Id. at 5. 

We have reviewed the transcript from the bench opinion of the Tax Court dated

February 9, 2004. In that opinion, the Honorable Robert Wherry, Jr., explains why the

Commissioner did not abuse his discretion in filing the lien that is the subject of this

dispute. We will affirm this frivolous appeal substantially for the reasons set forth by

Judge Wherry in his bench opinion.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 601 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 601

   Recognizing the efforts and contributions of outstanding Hispanic 
                    scientists in the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

           September 30 (legislative day, September 29), 2006

Mr. Martinez (for himself, Mr. Salazar, Mr. Menendez, and Mr. Nelson of 
Florida) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Recognizing the efforts and contributions of outstanding Hispanic 
                    scientists in the United States.

Whereas the purpose of the National Hispanic Scientist of the Year Award is to 
        recognize outstanding Hispanic scientists in the United States who 
        promote a greater public understanding of science and motivate Hispanic 
        youth to develop an interest in science;
Whereas the sixth annual National Hispanic Scientist of the Year Gala will be 
        held at the Museum of Science & Industry in Tampa, Florida, on Saturday, 
        October 28, 2006;
Whereas proceeds of the National Hispanic Scientist of the Year Gala support 
        scholarships for Hispanic boys and girls to participate in the Museum of 
        Science & Industry's Youth Enriched by Science Program, known as the 
        ``YES! Team''; and
Whereas a need to acknowledge the work and effort of outstanding Hispanic 
        scientists in the United States has led to the selection of Dr. Ines 
        Cifuentes as the honoree of the sixth annual National Hispanic Scientist 
        of the Year Award, in recognition of her dedication to training science 
        and mathematics educators, and her involvement in encouraging young 
        students to study the earth sciences: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) recognizes efforts to educate, support, and provide 
        hope for the Hispanic community, including efforts to honor 
        outstanding Hispanic scientists in the United States at the 
        annual National Hispanic Scientist of the Year Gala and to 
        organize a ``Meet the Hispanic Scientist Day''; and
            (2) congratulates Dr. Ines Cifuentes for being honored as 
        the National Hispanic Scientist of the Year for 2006 by the 
        Museum of Science & Industry, in recognition of the dedication 
        Dr. Cifuentes has shown to training science and mathematics 
        educators and her involvement in encouraging young students to 
        study the earth sciences.
                                 <all>
```
Appendix(B(

LandBros(Aerial(Photography,(L.L.C.

Phantom(3(Professional(Specifications
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 

          - [Docket No. EL07-56-000] 

Effective April 19, 2007, Alan Haymes, of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission), was designated as non-decisional staff in the above-captioned docket. As non-decisional staff, Mr. Haymes will not participate in an advisory capacity in deliberations on the issues pending therein. Separated non-decisional and advisory staffs are prohibited from communicating with one another concerning the deliberations set forth above. 

Kimberly D. Bose, 

Secretary.

[FR Doc. E7-7984 Filed 4-25-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
[ARTICLE] 5
<TABLE>
<S>                             <C>
[PERIOD-TYPE]                   6-MOS
[FISCAL-YEAR-END]                          DEC-31-1997
[PERIOD-END]                               JUN-30-1997
[CASH]                                           73000
[SECURITIES]                                         0
[RECEIVABLES]                                        0
[ALLOWANCES]                                         0
[INVENTORY]                                     445052
[CURRENT-ASSETS]                                522901
[PP&E]                                         3105979
[DEPRECIATION]                                 2454719
[TOTAL-ASSETS]                                 1342000
[CURRENT-LIABILITIES]                          2796316
[BONDS]                                              0
[PREFERRED-MANDATORY]                                0
[PREFERRED]                                       7545
[COMMON]                                        130654
[OTHER-SE]                                   (3682730)
[TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY]                   1342000
[SALES]                                        2213835
[TOTAL-REVENUES]                               2213835
[CGS]                                          1846902
[TOTAL-COSTS]                                  1846902
[OTHER-EXPENSES]                                436698
[LOSS-PROVISION]                                     0
[INTEREST-EXPENSE]                              148729
[INCOME-PRETAX]                                (69765)
[INCOME-TAX]                                   (69765)
[INCOME-CONTINUING]                            (69765)
[DISCONTINUED]                                       0
[EXTRAORDINARY]                                      0
[CHANGES]                                            0
[NET-INCOME]                                   (69765)
[EPS-PRIMARY]                                        0
[EPS-DILUTED]                                        0
</TABLE>
# C_2017392EN.01000501.xml

| 20.11.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 392/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.11.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 392/5

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 21 September 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Administratīvā apgabaltiesa — Latvia) — ‘DNB BANKA’ AS v Valsts ienemumu dienests

(Case C-326/15) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Taxation - Value added tax - Directive 2006/112/EC - Article 132(1)(f) - Exemptions for certain activities in the public interest - Exemption for the supply of services by independent groups of persons for their members - Applicability to financial services))

(2017/C 392/06)

Language of the case: Latvian

Referring court

Referring court

Administratīvā apgabaltiesa

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant:‘DNB BANKA’ AS

Applicant:

Defendant: Valsts ienemumu dienests

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 132(1)(f) of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax must be interpreted to the effect that the exemption provided for in that provision relates only to independent groups of persons whose members carry on an activity in the public interest referred to in Article 132 of that directive and that, therefore, the services supplied by a group whose members carry on an economic activity in the area of financial services, which does not constitute such an activity in the public interest, are not entitled to that exemption.

---

(1)  OJ C 311, 21.9.2015.

1

---
No. 49841.

#### Protests 93966-K, etc., of John C. Sleater Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

At the trial the record in *Sleater*v. *United States*(9 Cust. Ct. 190, C. D. 691) was incorporated herein, the merchandise, issue, parties, and claim being .the same. From the record in the case at bar it was found the Government has not been able to offer any competent testimony to overcome the *'prima facie*showing of the plaintiff that quilts or bedspreads were dobby woven and not woven with a jacquard loom. The invoice description or declaration showed that item No. 2128 was dobby woven. On the record the claim at 25 percent under paragraph 911 (a) was sustained.
III 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 571 

Recognizing Hispanic Heritage Month and celebrating the vast contributions 

of Hispanic Americans to the strength and culture of the United States. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 14, 2006 

Mr. FRIST (for himself, Mr. REID, Mr. MARTINEZ, Mr. SALAZAR, Mr. 

SANTORUM, Mrs. HUTCHISON, Mr. CRAPO, Mr. ALEXANDER, Mr. BINGAMAN, Mr. LIEBERMAN, Mr. MENENDEZ, and Mr. NELSON of Florida) 

submitted the following resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing Hispanic Heritage Month and celebrating the 

vast contributions of Hispanic Americans to the strength 

and culture of the United States. 

Whereas from September 15, 2006, through October 15, 

2006, the United States celebrates Hispanic Heritage 

Month; 

Whereas the presence of Hispanics in North America predates the founding of the United States, and, as among 

the first to settle in the New World, Hispanics and their 

descendants have had a profound and lasting influence on 

the history, values, and culture of the United States; 

Whereas, since the arrival of the earliest Spanish settlers 

more than 400 years ago, millions of Hispanic men and 


pwalker on PRODPC60 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 571 ATS 

women have come to the United States from Mexico, 

Puerto Rico, Cuba, and other Caribbean regions, Central 

America, South America, and Spain, in search of freedom, peace, and opportunity; 

Whereas Hispanic Americans have contributed throughout 

the ages to the prosperity and culture of the United 

States; 

Whereas the Bureau of the Census now lists Hispanic Americans as the largest ethnic minority within the United 

States; 

Whereas Hispanic Americans serve in all branches of the 

Armed Forces and have fought valiantly in every war in 

the history of the United States; 

Whereas the Medal of Honor is the highest United States 

military distinction, awarded since the Civil War for 

‘‘conspicuous gallantry and intrepidity at the risk of life 

above and beyond the call of duty’’; 

Whereas 41 men of Hispanic origin have earned this distinction, including 21 such men who sacrificed their lives; 

Whereas many Hispanic Americans who served in the Armed 

Forces have continued their service to the United States; 

Whereas many Hispanic Americans are dedicated public servants, holding posts at the highest levels of government, 

including 3 current seats in the United States Senate; 

and 

Whereas Hispanic Americans have a deep commitment to 

faith, family, and community, an enduring work ethic, 

and a perseverance to succeed: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 


pwalker on PRODPC60 with BILLS
3 

•SRES 571 ATS 

1 (1) recognizes September 15, 2006, through 

2 October 15, 2006, as Hispanic Heritage Month; 

3 (2) celebrates the vast contributions of Hispanic 

4 Americans to the strength and culture of the United 

5 States; and 

6 (3) encourages the people of the United States 

7 to observe Hispanic Heritage Month with appro8 priate programs and activities. 

Æ 


pwalker on PRODPC60 with BILLS
#### Chas. H. Asche & Co., Inc. *v.*United States

No. 6423.

Entry No. 711437, etc.

Invoices dated Nottingham, England, September 1943, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., October 18, 1943, etc.

(Decided October 7, 1946)

*Strauss & Hedges (Hadley S. King*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Bao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Tilson, Judge:

Counsel for the respective parties have agreed in effect that the issues involved in the appeals listed in schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, are the same in all material respects as the issues decided in *United States*v. *Pitcairn,*C. A. D. 334, and the record in that case has been omitted in evidence herein.

Applying the principles announced in the *Pitcairn*case, *supra,*to the facts in these appeals, I find and hold the proper dutiable export values of the merchandise to be the values found by the appraiser, less any amounts added under duress to meet advances made by the appraiser in similar cases then pending on appeal.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly..
06659.0010.646567.1

Exhibit 10.50
                                    AGREEMENT
                                    TO ISSUE
                                 WARRANTS OF USA

     United  States  Antimony  Corporation  ("USAC")  agrees  to  issue warrants
(25,000)  each  to  George  Desborough  and  Nick Raymond for USAC common stock,
within  thirty (30) days, bearing a restrictive legend, exercisable for a period
of three (3) years, at a strike price of forty-five cents (45 ) providing common
stock  is  authorized  as  additional consideration for the Assignment of Common
Stock  and  the  Royalty  Agreement.

DATED  this  29th  day  of  May,  2002.

                                   UNITED  STATES  ANTIMONY  CORPORATION



                                   By:/s/ John C. Lawrence
                                      --------------------
                                        John  C.  Lawrence
                                        President

ATTEST:


/s/ Michael Fleursch
--------------------
Michael  Fleursch
(Reap. Dec. 8819)

#### Davies Turner *&*Co. *v.*United States

Entry Nos. 902584; 741383; 792074.

*673(Decided June 5, 1957)

*John D. Rode*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Lawrence, Judge:

The appeals for a reappraisement enumerated in schedule *“A,”*attached to and made part of the decision herein, present the question of the proper dutiable value of certain merchandise imported from England.

The parties hereto have stipulated and agreed that, at the time of exportation of the involved merchandise, there was no foreign, export, or United States value for such or similar merchandise; that cost of production is the proper basis of appraisement; and that said cost of production is as follows:

> Item

> Superb Electric Immersion Heaters_£0-4-3

> Es-Es Electric Immersion Thermostat Major_£0-8-0

> Upon the agreed facts of record, I find and hold that cost of production, as that value is defined in section 402 (f) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. § 1402 (f)), is the proper basis of value for the articles in issue and that said value is as follows:

> Item

> Superb Electric Immersion Heaters_£0-4-3

> Es-Es Electric Immersion Thermostat Major_£0-8-0

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
# C_2015398EN.01007901.xml

| 30.11.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 398/79 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.11.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 398/79

---

Action brought on 21 September 2015 — ZZ v Commission

(Case F-123/15)

(2015/C 398/94)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: S. Orlandi and T. Martin, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision of the selection board in competition EPSO/AD/293/14 not to award the applicant a sufficient number of points for admission to the assessment centre.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Tribunal should:

| — | annul the decision of 11 June 2015 by which the selection board in competition EPSO/AD/293/14 refused to admit the applicant to the selection tests held at the assessment centre; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of 11 June 2015 by which the selection board in competition EPSO/AD/293/14 refused to admit the applicant to the selection tests held at the assessment centre;

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs.

---