Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 83 / Tuesday, May 1, 2007 / Notices 23823 

alkaline liquids, solvents, oils and 

coolants. The Kansas City Plant is a 

non-nuclear site and does not have 

special nuclear materials, but operations 

do generate small quantities of low-level 

radioactive waste. 

GSA and NNSA believe that the 

relocation of the non-nuclear 

production mission to another location 

outside of the Kansas City Metropolitan 

Area is not a reasonable alternative and 

do not intend to analyze it as an 

alternative in the present EA. 

DOE completed a Nuclear Weapons 

Complex Reconfiguration (Complex–21) 

Study in January 1991, which identified 

significant cost savings that could be 

achieved by downsizing the nuclear 

weapons complex. On January 27, 1992, 

the Department issued an NOI (57 FR 

3046) to prepare an environmental 

assessment (DOE/EA–0792) for the 

consolidation of non-nuclear production 

activities within the nuclear weapons 

complex. On September 14, 1993, DOE 

published a Finding of No Significant 

Impact (FONSI) regarding its proposal 

(58 FR 48043) to terminate non-nuclear 

production missions at the Mound Plant 

in Ohio, the Pinellas Plant in Florida, 

and the Rocky Flats Plant in Colorado, 

and consolidate the electrical and 

mechanical manufacturing functions at 

the Kansas City Plant. 

DOE issued an NOI on June 6, 1995 

(60 FR 31291), a final Stockpile 

Stewardship and Management PEIS on 

November 19, 1996 (61 FR 58871), and 

a ROD on December 26, 1996 (61 FR 

68014) announcing its decision to 

transform the weapons production 

complex by further downsizing of the 

nuclear weapons complex. This 

decision included reducing non-nuclear 

component fabrication capacity at the 

Kansas City Plant. In these documents 

DOE evaluated alternatives for 

consolidation of non-nuclear 

manufacturing, storage and surveillance 

functions of the Nuclear Weapons 

Complex to the Kansas City Plant and 

reducing the capacity for non-nuclear 

component fabrication. 

The proposed action would continue 

the consolidation and downsizing of 

non-nuclear activities at the Kansas City 

Plant begun in the early 1990s. The 

alternatives are constructed around the 

mission need to maintain the Kansas 

City Plant while downsizing for cost 

efficiency. Keeping these activities in 

the Kansas City area is consistent with 

NNSA’s broader proposed 

transformation of the U.S. nuclear 

weapons complex and is based on the 

previous NEPA analyses and decisions 

described above, and on an economic 

analysis that will be included in the 

Environmental Assessment. GSA and 

NNSA invite and will consider 

comments on this issue during the 

scoping process. 

Separately, NNSA is preparing a 

Supplement to the Stockpile 

Stewardship and Management 

Programmatic Environmental Impact 

Statement—Complex 2030 (DOE/EIS– 

0236–S4) that evaluates alternatives for 

the continued transformation of the 

nuclear weapons complex. As explained 

in the NOI for that Supplemental PEIS 

(71 FR 61731; October 19, 2006), 

‘‘NNSA believes that it is appropriate to 

separate the analyses of the 

transformation of non-nuclear 

production from the Supplemental PEIS 

because decisions regarding non-nuclear 

activities would neither significantly 

affect nor be affected by decisions 

regarding the transformation of nuclear 

production activities.’’ 

Dated: April 23, 2007. 

Carlos A Salazar, 

Regional NEPA Coordinator,Portfolio 

Management Division (6PTA),GSA Public 

Buildings Service, Heartland Region. 

[FR Doc. E7–8207 Filed 4–30–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6820–CG–S 

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES 

Nominations Requested/Open for the 

2007 Innovation in Prevention Awards 

AGENCY: Department of Health and 

Human Services, Office of the Secretary. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Health and 

Human Services (HHS) seeks 

nominations of public and private sector 

organizations to receive the 2007 

Innovation in Prevention Awards. This 

activity seeks to advance President 

George W. Bush’s HealthierUS goal of 

helping Americans live longer, better, 

and healthier lives. The statutory 

authority for this health promotion 

activity is Section 1703 [42 U.S.C. 

300u–2] from Title XVII of the Public 

Health Service Act. The Innovation in 

Prevention Awards Initiative will 

identify and celebrate outstanding 

organizations that have implemented 

innovative and creative chronic disease 

prevention and health promotion 

programs. To be nominated, a program 

must address at least one of the 

following risk categories: 

(1) Obesity; 

(2) Physical activity; and 

(3) Nutrition. 

The Department intends that these 

awards will provide an opportunity to 

increase public awareness of creative 

approaches to develop and expand 

innovative health programs and 

encourage duplication of successful 

strategies. 

Awards will be given in the following 

categories: 

<bullet≤ Faith-Based and/or 

Community Initiatives. 

<bullet≤ Health Care Delivery. 

<bullet≤ Healthy Workplace. 

[cir] Large Employer ≤ 500 employees. 

[cir] Small Employer < 500 

employees. 

<bullet≤ Non-Profit. 

<bullet≤ Public Sector. 

<bullet≤ Schools (K–12). 

The following criteria will be taken 

into consideration upon review: 

<bullet≤ Creativity/Innovation. 

<bullet≤ Leadership. 

<bullet≤ Sustainability. 

<bullet≤ Replicability. 

<bullet≤ Effectiveness (results/ 

outcomes). 

<bullet≤ Receipt of other awards or 

recognition at the national, state, or 

local level. 

DATES: Nominations must be received 

by 5 p.m. EDT on June 29, 2007. 

Nominations: Partnership for 

Prevention, a 501(c)(3) organization 

focused on health promotion, is 

coordinating the nomination process for 

the Innovation in Prevention Awards on 

behalf of the HHS. Nominations can 

only be made electronically at http:// 

www.prevent.org/awards2007. For more 

information, contact Partnership for 

Prevention at (202) 785–4943 or 

innovationawards@prevent.org. 

Partnership for Prevention may request 

additional information as necessary. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Department of Health and Human 

Services is the U.S. government’s 

principal agency for promoting and 

protecting the health of all Americans. 

The HHS manages many programs, 

covering a broad spectrum of health 

promotion and disease prevention 

services and activities. Leaders in the 

business community, State and local 

government officials, tribes and tribal 

entities, and charitable, faith-based, and 

community organizations have 

expressed an interest in working with 

the Department to promote healthy 

choices and behaviors. The Secretary 

welcomes this interest. With this notice, 

the Secretary outlines opportunities to 

identify and celebrate outstanding 

organizations that have implemented 

innovative and creative chronic disease 

prevention and health promotion 

programs. 

Dated: April 25, 2007. 

John O. Agwunobi, 

Assistant Secretary for Health. 

[FR Doc. E7–8226 Filed 4–30–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4151–05–P 


rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with MISCELLANEOUS