alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 472 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 472

 Commemorating and acknowledging the dedication and sacrifice made by 
   the men and women who have lost their lives while serving as law 
                         enforcement officers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 10, 2006

Mr. Leahy (for himself, Mr. Frist, Mr. Reid, Mr. Biden, Mr. Durbin, Mr. 
    Obama, Mr. Grassley, Mr. Cornyn, Mr. Brownback, Mr. Graham, Ms. 
Stabenow, Mr. Menendez, Mr. Allen, Ms. Cantwell, and Mr. Kyl) submitted 
      the following resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Commemorating and acknowledging the dedication and sacrifice made by 
   the men and women who have lost their lives while serving as law 
                         enforcement officers.

Whereas the well-being of all citizens of the United States is preserved and 
        enhanced as a direct result of the vigilance and dedication of law 
        enforcement personnel;
Whereas more than 900,000 men and women, at great risk to their personal safety, 
        presently serve their fellow citizens as guardians of peace;
Whereas peace officers are on the front lines in preserving the right of the 
        children of the United States to receive an education in a crime-free 
        environment, a right that is all too often threatened by the insidious 
        fear caused by violence in schools;
Whereas 156 peace officers across the United States were killed in the line of 
        duty during 2005, which is below the decade-long annual average of 167 
        deaths;
Whereas a number of factors contributed to this reduction in deaths, including--

    (1) better equipment and increased use of bullet-resistant vests;

    (2) improved training;

    (3) longer prison terms for violent offenders; and

    (4) advanced emergency medical care;

Whereas every other day, 1 out of every 16 peace officers is assaulted, 1 out of 
        every 56 peace officers is injured, and 1 out of every 5,500 peace 
        officers is killed in the line of duty somewhere in the United States; 
        and
Whereas on May 15, 2006, more than 20,000 peace officers are expected to gather 
        in Washington, D.C., to join with the families of their recently fallen 
        comrades to honor those comrades and all others who went before them: 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) recognizes May 15, 2006, as ``Peace Officers Memorial 
        Day'', in honor of the Federal, State, and local officers that 
        have been killed or disabled in the line of duty; and
            (2) calls on the people of the United States to observe 
        that day with appropriate ceremonies and respect.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 35.1





SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT



Re: Mercedes-Benz Financial Services USA LLC, in its capacity
as Servicer (the “Servicer”) under the Amended and Restated Servicing Agreement, dated as of March 1, 2009, among Daimler
Trust, as Titling Trust, Daimler Title Co., as Collateral Agent, and Mercedes-Benz Financial Services USA LLC, as Lender and as
Servicer (the “Servicing Agreement”), and under the 2016-A Servicing Supplement, dated as of March 1, 2016, among the
same parties (the “Servicing Supplement”) for the period from March 16, 2016, to December 31, 2016 (the “Reporting
Period”)



I, Brian T. Stevens, certify that:



| | (a) | A review of the Servicer’s activities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under the Servicing Agreement
and the Servicing Supplement has been made under my supervision.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement
and the Servicing Supplement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: March 20, 2017







| | /s/ Brian T. Stevens                
| | ------------------------------------
| | Name: Brian T. Stevens              
| | Title: Vice President and Controller
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000101462
<NAME> UNITED REFINING CO.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          11,705
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   32,241
<ALLOWANCES>                                       384
<INVENTORY>                                     78,881
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               137,040
<PP&E>                                         271,224
<DEPRECIATION>                                  64,633
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 364,433
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           81,389
<BONDS>                                        200,815
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      47,349
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   364,433
<SALES>                                        517,067
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               517,067
<CGS>                                          442,059
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   57,133
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   104
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              17,210
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,377)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,706)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,671)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                        4,783
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,112
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
No. 48737.

#### Protests 533903-G, etc., of H. W. Peabody & Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

The record established that certain of the merchandise consists of “8-bu” paper hats, known as harvest hats, similar to those involved in *Caradine*v. *United States*(9 Cust. Ct. 69, C. D. 664). In accordance therewith the claim at only 25 percent was sustained.
EXHIBIT  32.2



                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with  the  Trinity  Learning  Corporation  (the  "Company")
Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2005 as filed
with  the  Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I,  Patrick R Quinn, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act  of  2002,  that,  to  the  best  of  my  knowledge:

1.     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Act  of  1934,  as  amended;  and

2.     The  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results of operations of the Company.


Date:     February  14,  2005

     /S/  Patrick  R  Quinn
     ----------------------
     Patrick  R  Quinn
     Chief  Financial  Officer





A  signed  original  of  this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided  to  Trinity  Learning  Corporation  and  will  be  retained  by it and
furnished  to  the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
No. 56159.

protests 170483-K, etc. (New York).

#### Greenbaum Novelty Corp. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
Case No. 9,927.

#### MUNRO v. ROBERTSON.

[2 Cranch, C. C. 262.] 1

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

Oct. Term, 1821.

Deed — Valuable Consideration — Evidence.

If a deed purports to be made "for a valuable consideration,” it is competent, for a person claiming under it, to give evidence of a money consideration.

This was an attachment, under the Maryland act of 1795, c. 56, levied upon the lands of an' absent debtor [Samuel Robertson]. Part of the lands had been conveyed by the debtor, to certain trustees, to secure certain creditors, by a deed of bargain and sale, the consideration of which was stated in the deed to be “for value received,” and in consideration of certain trusts in' another deed mentioned to be performed by the trustees, &c. The deed referred to was not a legal conveyance, because not recorded in time, but it was upon a money consideration.

Key & Dunlop, for plaintiffs [Munro’s executors],

contended that the deed, being a bargain and sale, was void, because not stated to be in consideration of money paid, and cited 2 Bl. Comm. 29G, 33S, and Gittings' Lessee v. Hall, 1 Har. & J. 14.

Mr. Lear, for creditors secured by the deed,

contended that it was competent for him to prove a money consideration'. Cheney’s Lessee v. Watkins, 1 Har. & J. 530.

THE COURT

(MORSELL, Circuit Judge, absent)

refused to render judgment of condemnation, and said that, the consideration being stated in the deed to be “value received,” a money consideration may be averred and proved: especially as the second deed refers to the first, in which a money consideration is stated.

[Subsequently the attachment was quashed. Case No. 9.928.]
Before the Second Division,

June 16, 1945

No. 50266.

#### Protest 101603-K of Stoffel & Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of calendars similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Thorens, Inc.*(32 C. C. P. A. 137, C. A. D. 298), the protest was sustained as claimed.
# C_2016314EN.01002301.xml

| 29.8.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 314/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.8.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 314/23

---

Judgment of the General Court of 14 July 2016 — Volkswagen v EUIPO (ConnectedWork)

(Case T-491/15) (1)

1

((European Union trade mark - Application for European Union word mark ConnectedWork - Absolute ground for refusal - Lack of distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) and Article 75 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Obligation to state reasons))

(2016/C 314/31)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Volkswagen AG (Wolfsburg, Germany) (represented by: U. Sander, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: E. Eberl and A. Schifko, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 29 June 2015 (Case R 160/2015-5) concerning an application for registration of the word sign ConnectedWork as a European Union trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Volkswagen AG to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Volkswagen AG to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 337, 12.10.2015.

1

---
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 193 

Recognizing all hunters across the United States for their continued 

commitment to safety. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 26, 2007 

Mr. CARNEY (for himself, Mr. SHUSTER, Mr. HOLDEN, Mr. BISHOP of Georgia, Mr. BOSWELL, Mr. BOYD of Florida, Mr. MOORE of Kansas, Mr. 

PATRICK J. MURPHY of Pennsylvania, Mrs. GILLIBRAND, Mr. DENT, and 

Mr. LINCOLN DAVIS of Tennessee) submitted the following concurrent 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Recognizing all hunters across the United States for their 

continued commitment to safety. 

Whereas in 2006 there were over 16,000,000 hunters in the 

United States of which only .0013 percent incurred an 

injury during the past hunting season; 

Whereas in 2006 this injury rate was lower than many other 

forms of recreation; 

Whereas there are 70,000 hunter education instructors teaching hunter safety, ethics, and conservation to approximately 750,000 students successfully each year; 


bajohnson on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•HCON 193 IH 

Whereas State fish and game agencies began offering hunter 

safety programs in 1949, and since then, more than 

35,000,000 people have been certified; 

Whereas much of the success of hunter safety can be contributed to hunter education training and the role of responsible hunters in the field; 

Whereas Congress commends Pennsylvania hunters for setting a new State safety record in 2006; 

Whereas hunters continue year after year to improve their 

safety record; and 

Whereas hunters are the vital link in preserving and maintaining the great natural resources in the United States, 

including wild places: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That the Congress— 

3 (1) recognizes all hunters across the United 

4 States for their continued commitment to safety; 

5 and 

6 (2) directs the Secretary of the Senate to trans7 mit a copy of this resolution to the Pennsylvania 

8 State Game Commissioner and the Director of the 

9 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
# t• RHODE I SLAND 

# __**~4** 

# __ D_EP_A_R_T_M_E_ N

_ T

_O_ F _E_N......,V_IR_ O _N_M_ E N_T_ A _L _M_A_N_A_ G

_

E _M_E_N_T_ 

# a 235 Prome nade Street, P rovid ence, RI 029 0 8 - 5767

28 March 2016 David Conroy U . S . EPA - Region 1 5 Post Office Square, Suite 100 (OEP05-02) Boston , MA 02109-3912 Re: Withdrawal of Air Quality State Implementation Plans Dear Mr. Conroy : T DD 4 01 -831 - 55 08

I hereby wi t hdraw the following A ir Pollution Control Regulations that were included in an Air Quality State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision submitted by the Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management (DEM) to EPA on September 22, 2008 . Rhode Island Air Pollut i on Control General Definitions Regulation [Last Amended 9 October 2008] Air Pollution Control R egulation No 9 " Air Pollution Control Permits " [Last Amended 9 October 2008] A later version of the General Definition s Regulation wa s approved by EPA on March 13, 2012 and the 9 October 2008 version of APC Regulation No. 9 is not the most current ver s ion of th is re gu lation. Therefore, rather than dev ote resource s to action on the abo v e SIP revi s ion s , DEM i s withdrawing them s o that EPA a nd DEM can focus attenti o n on prior ity SIP r evi s ion s. Ifyou have an y question s on this issue , please contact me at (401) 222-2808 , x- 7011. Sincerel y,

'· , _,-,**/}-** I

. ; . I I 

# 0 (J(Jl'(lxJ (; . 

# 7ffor / I J 

### I Douglas L. McVay , Ch\#' Office of Air Resources cc: Anne Arnold - EPA Ida McDonnell - EPA**~** 

## t:..: 30% post-consu mer fibe r
#### Maurice Levy et al. *v.*United States

No. 6431.

Entry No. 703799, etc.

Invoices dated London, England, May 26, 1941, etc.

Certified May 29, 1941, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., July 17, 1941, etc.

(Decided October 9, 1946)

*Strauss & Hedges (Hadley S. King*of counsel) for the plaintiffs.

*Paul P. Bao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Mollison, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On.the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importers on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
# C_2016191EN.01004604.xml

| 30.5.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 191/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.5.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 191/46

---

Order of the General Court of 16 March 2016 — Bimbo v OHIM — ISMS (BIMBO BEL SIMPLY)

(Case T-571/15) (1)

1

(2016/C 191/66)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 406, 7.12.2015.

1

---
FILED U.S. COURT OF AP PEALS ELEV ENT HC IR C U IT J UNE 7 , 2006 THOMAS K. KAHN CLERK [ DO NO T P UB L I S H] I N THE UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS F O R T H E E L E V E N T H C IR C U IT

________________________ N o. 05- 15666 N on -A rgum entC al endar

________________________ D. C . Do c k e tNo . 0 4 - 0 0 1 5 7 - C R - OR L - 2 2 - DA B U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A , P la in tif f- A p p e lle e , v ersu s S A H I S A R W A R , D e fe n d a n t- A p p e lla n t.

________________________ A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt forthe M i ddl e D i s tr i c tof F l or i da

_________________________ ( Ju n e 7, 2006) B efo re T JO F L A T , W IL S O N an d H IL L , C i rcu i tJu d g es. P E R C U R I A M: R osem ar y C akm i s, appo i nt ed coun se l for S ahi S ar w ari n thi s di re ctcr i m i nal2

a ppe a l , ha s m ove d t o w i thdr a w f r om f ur the rr e pr e s e nt a t i on of the a ppe l l a nta nd f i l e d abr i e f

pur s ua ntt o A nde r s v. C a l i for ni a , 386 U . S . 738, 87 S . C t . 1396, 18 L . E d. 2d 49 3 (19 67 ). O ur i nd ependentre vi ew of the ent i re re cord revea l s that co u n sel ’ s assessm en to f th e rel at i v e m eri to f th e ap p eal i s co rrect . B ecau se in d e p e n d e n t e x a m in a tio n o f th e e n tir e r e c o r d r e v e a ls n o a r g u a b le is s u e s o f m e r it, co u n sel ’ s m o t i o n t o w i th d raw i s G R A N TED , a nd S a r w a r ’ s c onvi c t i on a nd se nt ence ar e A FFI R M ED .
(Reap. Dec. 8392)

Entry No. 763960, etc.

#### Tunnell Wong Company et al. *v.*United States

(Decided February 18, 1955)

*Jordan & Klingaman*for the plaintiffs.

*Warren E. Burger,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Laweence, Judge:

The question of the proper value for duty purposes of the importations covered by the appeals for a reappraisement enumerated in schedule *“A,”*attached to and made part of this decision, is before the court for decision.

The respective parties have submitted said appeals for decision upon a stipulation to the effect that on or about the dates of exportation of the merchandise, the prices at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale for home consumption to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country of exportation, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, including the cost of all containers and coverings, and all other costs, charges, and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States, are represented by the appraised values, less the amounts added by the appraiser for packing costs. It was further stipulated and agreed that, on or about the dates of exportation of said merchandise, neither such nor similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country *459of exportation, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States.

Upon the agreed facts, I find that foreign value, as that value is defined in section 402 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Administrative Act of 1938 (19 U. S. C. § 1402 (c)), is the proper basis for the determination of the value of the involved merchandise and that such value is represented by the appraised values, less the amounts added by the appraiser for packing costs. Judgment will be entered accordingly.
# C_2016462EN.01000701.xml

| 12.12.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 462/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.12.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 462/7

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 13 October 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Łodzi — Poland) — Naczelnik Urzędu Celnego I w Łodzi v G. M., M. S.

(Case C-303/15) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Technical regulations in the gambling sector - Directive 98/34/EC - Concept of ‘technical regulation’ - Obligation on Member States to notify the European Commission of all draft technical regulations - Inapplicability of rules classifiable as technical regulations not notified to the Commission))

(2016/C 462/10)

Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Referring court

Sąd Okręgowy w Łodzi

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Naczelnik Urzędu Celnego I w Łodzi

Applicant:

Defendants: G. M., M. S.

Defendants:

Intervener in support of the defendants: Colin Wiliams sp. z o.o.

Intervener in support of the defendants:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 1 of Directive 98/34/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 June 1998 laying down a procedure for the provision of information in the field of technical standards and regulations and of rules on Information Society services, as amended by Directive 98/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 July 1998, must be interpreted as meaning that a provision of national law, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, does not fall within the scope of the concept of a ‘technical regulation’, within the meaning of that directive, subject to obligatory notification under Article 8(1) of that directive, the penalty for failure to fulfil that obligation being that such a regulation is inapplicable.

---

(1)  OJ C 311, 21.9.2015.

1

---