alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 80 (Thursday, April 26, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 20921]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-7960]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Bureau of Customs and Border Protection


Notice of Cancellation of Customs Broker License Due To Death of 
the License Holder

AGENCY: Bureau of Customs and Border Protection, U.S. Department of 
Homeland Security.

ACTION: General Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to Title 19 of the Code 
of Federal Regulations at section 111.51(a), the following individual 
Customs broker licenses and any and all permits have been cancelled due 
to the death of the broker:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                    License <greek-
               Name                       i>              Port name
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Darlene A. Liskiewicz.............            6410  Buffalo.
Brenda K. Chronister..............           20443  St. Louis.
------------------------------------------------------------------------


    Dated: April 16, 2007.
Daniel Baldwin,
Assistant Commissioner, Office of International Trade.
[FR Doc. E7-7960 Filed 4-25-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-14-P
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.13

                                PROMISSORY NOTE


June 16, 1999                                                      $162,500.00


     FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned, Eric Swanson, hereby promises to pay
to the order of Sycamore Networks, Inc. (the "Company") the principal amount of
One Hundred Sixty-Two Thousand, Five Hundred Dollars ($162,500.00).

     All principal and accrued interest hereon shall be due and payable upon the
earlier of:

          (i)  June 16,2004; and
          (ii) The first date on which the undersigned ceases to serve as an
               employee of, or consultant to, the Company.

     The undersigned may prepay this Note, in whole or in part, at any time and
from time to time without premium or penalty.  In addition, the undersigned
agrees that he shall apply the proceeds from any sale of shares of Common Stock
of the Company to the prepayment of this Note.

     This Note shall be governed by the laws of the Commonwealth of
Massachusetts.

     Executed under seal as of the date first above written.



                                    /s/ Eric Swanson
                                    ---------------------
                                    Eric Swanson
PROGRESSIVE TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION
601 Cleveland Street, Suite 930
Clearwater, FL  33755



							February 16, 2000


Sommer & Schneider LLP
595 Stewart Avenue, Suite 710
Garden City, NY 11530

Gentlemen:

	As compensation for legal consulting services rendered by you we confirm
our agreement to issue to you an aggregate of 25,000 shares of Progressive
Telecommun-ications Corporation (the "Company") common stock, $.001 par value,
as follows:

	Joel C. Schneider      12,500
	Herbert H. Sommer      12,500

These shares will be issued upon the effective date of a Form S-8 Registration
Statement and the delivery of the documents to you which constitute the S-8
Prospectus, which the Company agrees to complete with your assistance by
February 22, 2000, free and clear of any restrictions on sale by you..  We also
confirm that the board of directors of the Company have duly approved the
issuance of shares to you.  Please confirm that this correctly sets forth our
understanding relating to the settlement of  compensation due to you for these
services by signing the extra copy of this letter and returning it to us.

					      PROGRESSIVE TELECOMMUNICATIONS
					      CORPORATION


					      BY: /s/ Barry L. Shevlin
      						   Barry L.  Shevlin,
      						   Chairman and CEO

Accepted:


/s/ Harbert H. Sommer				                           /s/ Joel C. Schneider
Herbert H. Sommer, Partner                         Joel C. Schneider, Partner
# C_2015213EN.01003602.xml

| 29.6.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 213/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.6.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 213/36

---

Order of the General Court of 6 May 2015 — Deza v ECHA

(Case T-115/15 R)

((Interim measures - REACH - Entry of the chemical substance di-(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (DEHP) in the candidate list - Application for suspension of operation - No urgency))

(2015/C 213/61)

Language of the case: Czech

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Deza, a.s. (Valašské Meziřiči, Czech Republic) (represented by: P. Dejl, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant(s): ECHA (represented by: M. Heikkilä, W. Broere and T. Zbihlej, acting as Agents)

Defendant(s):

Re:

Re:

Application for the suspension of operation of Decision ED/108/2014 of 12 December 2014 of the Executive Director of the European Chemicals Agency updating, inter alia, the existing entry for the substance di-(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (DEHP) in the candidate list for eventual inclusion in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), establishing a European Chemicals Agency, amending Directive 1999/45/EC and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 793/93 and Commission Regulation (EC) No 1488/94 as well as Council Directive 76/769/EEC and Commission Directives 91/155/EEC, 93/67/EEC, 93/105/EC and 2000/21/EC (corrected version OJ 2007 L 136, p. 3), as amended.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim measures is rejected. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim measures is rejected.

| 2. | The costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The costs are reserved.

---
Turkey Meadow Trail

Turkey Meado w Trail

Meadowood Trail

Meadowood Trail

Kiosk Trail

Red Fox Marsh Trail

Sapling Trail

Meadowoo d Trail

Hidden Pon d Trail

Wood Thru sh Trail Wood Thrush Trail

Mustang Trail

Mustang Trail

Thompson

Creek

Trail

Chicken Coop Trail

Holly Ridge Trail

Tho

mpson

Creek Trail

0 0.25 0.5 Miles

Meadowood Recreation Area

Trail Map

2006

Trail Legend

administrative road paved

gravel road

hiking trail

hiking/horseback riding trail

multi-use trail

planned hiking/biking trail

planned hiking/horseback riding trail

planned universal access trail

Old Colchester Road

Gunston Road

Harley Road

n

Gunston Elementary School

!i

West Meadows Access

and Control Line Fields ±

Lower Potomac Field

Station Office

Enchanted

Pond

!l

!l

Hidden

Pond

Mustang

Trailhead

Environmental Education

Center and Wood Thrush

Trailhead

Belmont Boulevard

!i
Case No. 6,903.

#### In re HUNTER.

[18 N. B. R. 504.] 1

District Court, W. D. Tennessee.

Dec., 1878.

Bankruptcy — Public Sale — Publication op Notice.

It is imperative under the statute that notices of all public sales shall be published for three consecutive weeks, whether the assignee or other officer proceeds under the power given him by the statute or under a special order of the court, and there is no power in the court or judge to change this requirement.

[In bankruptcy. In the matter of Mrs. M. C. Hunter.]

To Hon. E. S. Hammond, Judge of Said Court: Xour petitioner respectfully represents that he was elected assignee of the above estate, just prior to the yellow fever. The assets, consisting of millinery, did not come into his hands until the fourteenth day of August, when there was no sale for them; the same have been boxed and stored for several months. The petitioner has earnestly, but unsuccessfully, endeavored for a few days to secure a favorable otter for said stock without success, it being unseasonable and unsalable; and he is satisfied, after a thorough examination of the stock, and having had it examined by persons acquainted with its value, that the said stock ought to be sold at public auction. Petitioner has rented a very cheap and well-located small store-room, where the said stock is being opened; and as he has no authority to sell at public auction without giving three weeks’ notice by advertisement, he respectfully asks for an order of sale, authorizing him to sell at .auction on the sixteenth day of December, 1878, to save the expense of rent and other expenses that will amount to more • than the value of "the goods. O. Wooldridge, Assignee.

Memphis, Tenn., December 10th, 1878.

1

 [Reprinted by permission.]

HAMMOND, District Judge.

Section 4 of the act of June 22,1874, c. 390 (18 Stat 178); Bump (10th Ed.) p. 367, — enacts that “all notices of public sales under this act by any assignee, or officer of the court, shall be published once a week for three consecutive weeks, in the newspaper or newspapers, to be designated by the judge, which in his opinion shall be best calculated to give general notice of the sale.” While the court has power under this section to supervise the sales made, and to direct a private sale if necessary, it has no power to change the character of notice prescribed for a public sale. It is imperative under the statute that notice shall be given for three consecutive weeks, in a newspaper or newspapers, designated by the judge, of all public sales, whether the assignee, or other officer, proceeds under the power given him by the statute or under a special order of the court. There is no power in the judge or court to change this requirement of the statute. The foregoing application is therefore denied.
**EXHIBIT23**

**Analysis, Research & PlanningCorporation’s Consent**

Union CarbideCorporation:

Analysis, Research &Planning Corporation (“ARPC”) hereby consents to the use of ARPC’s name and thereference to ARPC’s reports dated January 9, 2003, January 26, 2004, January26, 2005 and January 3, 2006 in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q ofUnion Carbide Corporation for the quarter ended September 30, 2006.

 
| /s/ B. THOMAS FLORENCE                                            |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| B. Thomas Florence                                                |   |
| President                                                         |   |
| Analysis, Research & Planning Corporation |   |
| October 27, 2006                                                  |   |

 

24

----
No. 39041.

#### Protest 848777-G of California Brush Co. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of palmyra fiber the same as that passed upon in *American Push Broom & Brush Co.*v. *United States*(25 C. C. P. A. 248, T. D. 49391). The claim for free entry under paragraph 1684 was therefore sustained.
# C_2019328EN.01003701.xml

| 30.9.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 328/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.9.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 328/37

---

Judgment of the General Court of 11 July 2019 — CCPL and Others v Commission

(Case T-522/15) (1)

(Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Retail food packaging market - Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU - Attributability of unlawful conduct - 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines - Value of sales - Ceiling of the fine - Proportionality - Equal treatment - Ability to pay)

(2019/C 328/39)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicants: CCPL — Consorzio Cooperative di Produzione e Lavoro SC (Reggio Emilia, Italy), Coopbox group SpA (Reggio Emilia), Poliemme Srl (Reggio Emilia), Coopbox Hispania, SL (Lorca, Spain), Coopbox Eastern s. r. o. (Nové Mesto nad Váhom, Slovakia) (represented by: S. Bariatti and E. Cucchiara, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented initially by F. Jimeno Fernández, A. Biolan and P. Rossi, and subsequently by F. Jimeno Fernandez, P. Rossi and L. Malferrari, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU for, principally, the partial annulment of Commission Decision C(2015) 4336 final of 24 June 2015 relating to a proceeding under Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case AT.39563 — Retail food packaging) and, in the alternative, for the reduction of the fines imposed on the applicants.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls Article 2(1)(f) and (g), Article 2(d) and (e) and Article 2(4)(c) and (d) of Commission Decision C(2015) 4336 final of 24 June 2015 relating to a proceeding under Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case AT.39563 — Retail food packaging); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls Article 2(1)(f) and (g), Article 2(d) and (e) and Article 2(4)(c) and (d) of Commission Decision C(2015) 4336 final of 24 June 2015 relating to a proceeding under Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case AT.39563 — Retail food packaging);

| 2. | Orders the European Commission to pay the costs, including those of the application for interim measures. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the European Commission to pay the costs, including those of the application for interim measures.

---

(1)  OJ C 354, 26.10.2015.

---
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, John C. Lawrence, President, and Chief Executive Officer of United States
Antimony Corporation (the "Company") do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to my knowledge:

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended
September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ John C. Lawrence
-----------------------------------
John C. Lawrence
President and Chief Executive Officer

November 20, 2006
Order entered December 18 , 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 14
- 01232
- CV
WILLIAM “BRANCH” WARREN, Appellant

V. CARLSON RESTAURANTS, INC. D/B/A TGI FRIDA Y'S, INC., Appellee

On Appeal from the 298th Judicial Distr ict Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC
- 13
- 02122



### O RDER
We GRANT appellant’s December 15, 2014 agreed motion for an extension of time to file a brief. Appellant shall file his brief by DECEMBER 22, 2014

.
/s/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS JUSTICE
----

Information communicated by Member States regarding State aid granted under Commission Regulation (EC) No 68/2001 of 12 January 2001 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to training aid

(2005/C 285/05)

(Text with EEA relevance)

----

(1)  EUR 13 924 676 has been earmarked until 31 December 2006.

----
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

                                     EXHIBIT (27)
<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE JUNE 30,
1999 10-Q FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                       Jun-30-1999
<CASH>                               1,009,863
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                  15,297
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                        16,463
<TRADING-ASSETS>                        18,990
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>          4,375,966
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>               6,378,484
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                 6,238,289
<LOANS>                             21,538,820
<ALLOWANCE>                            321,700
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      34,225,760
<DEPOSITS>                          23,442,900
<SHORT-TERM>                         3,734,712
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                    444,757
<LONG-TERM>                          4,001,925
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        0
<PREFERRED>                                  0
<COMMON>                               142,018
<OTHER-SE>                           2,459,448
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>      34,225,760
<INTEREST-LOAN>                        407,045
<INTEREST-INVEST>                      161,054
<INTEREST-OTHER>                           612
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                       568,711
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                     166,807
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                     260,120
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                  308,591
<LOAN-LOSSES>                           16,500
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                       2,094
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                        207,216
<INCOME-PRETAX>                        180,802
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>             120,337
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              0
<CHANGES>                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                           120,337
<EPS-BASIC>                             0.71
<EPS-DILUTED>                             0.70
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                            3.92
<LOANS-NON>                             94,825
<LOANS-PAST>                            37,674
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                             0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                         64,476
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                       328,302
<CHARGE-OFFS>                           28,838
<RECOVERIES>                             5,736
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                      321,700
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                   167,485
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                          0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                154,215








</TABLE>
Low Wind Speed Technology Phase II: Sweep-Twist Blade Design and Fabrication with 

Atmospheric Test Verification 

Knight & Carver

Project Description: Knight and Carver will develop a sweep-twist adaptive 

blade (approximately 28 m long) to reduce operating loads and allow a larger, 

more productive rotor. The blade design will use outer blade sweep to create 

twist coupling without angled fiber. This concept has potentially significant 

cost and manufacturing advantages. After the design phase, several prototypes 

blades will be built using a unique fabrication process. Following static and 

fatigue tests, three blades will be flight tested on an existing 750-kW turbine 

and resulting data will be compared to the 

baseline.

Project Type:	 Component Development

Total Project Budget: 	 $2,856,154

Industry Cost Share: 	 $856,846

DOE Cost Share: 	 $1,999,308

Planned Project Duration: December 2004-July 2008

Contacts:

NREL/Sandia: Knight & Carver:

Tom Ashwill	 Gary Kanaby, Wind Blade Manager

Box 5800	 1313 Bay Marina Drive

Albuquerque, NM 87185	 National City, CA 91950

505-845-8457	 619-271-3689 (cell: 619-778-7213)

tdashwi@sandia.gov	 Fax: 619-474-4811

gkanaby@knightandcarver.com

Current Status: 	 In Progress

A Strong Portfolio for a Strong America • Energy efficiency and clean, renewable energy will mean a stronger economy, a cleaner environment, and greater energy 

independence for America. Working with a wide array of state, community, industry, and university partners, the U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Energy Efficiency 

and Renewable Energy invests in a diverse portfolio of energy technologies.

For more information contact EERE Information Center • 1-877-EERE-INF (1-877-337-3463) • www.eere.energy.gov

Produced for the U.S. Department of Energy by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, a DOE national laboratory

Printed with a renewable-source ink on paper containing at least 50% wastepaper, including 10% post consumer waste.

DOE/GO-102006-2323

June 2006

Planform of the sweep twist blade.

3.000

2.000

1.000

0.000

-1.000

-2.000

-3.000

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24

Station (m)

Position (m)

03986301

The initial mold fabrication for Knight and Carver’s sweep 

twist blade.
Before the First Division,

January 13, 1941

No. 45169.

#### Petition 6062-R of Stephen Rug Mills (Savannah).

Walker, Judge:

This is a petition filed under the provisions of section 489, Tariff Act of 1930, for remission of additional duties accruing by reason of undervaluation on entry of rugs imported from Belgium.

On the trial of the issue one Seymour Rubin, who identified himself as office manager of the petitioning corporation and stated that he had control of the management of importations therefor, testified that at the time of the entry in question he had been advised by the customs broker who made entries for the petitioner at New York that an investigation was being conducted as to the value of the type of' merchandise involved, and for that reason entry was, in each case, made at the invoice value. The witness testified that an arrangement was made with the customs authorities at the port of New York to permit amendment of the entries after completion of the investigation, but that for some unexplained reason there was a failure to make the same arrangement with the customs authorities at Savannah. There were, he said, many entries made through the port of New York, all of which were handled satisfactorily according to the arrangement, and the entry here involved was the only one made at Savannah.

The petitioner’s customs broker, who handled the entries made at the port of New York, testified that he failed to advise the customs broker who made the entry at Savannah of the arrangements made at the port of New York, and instructed him to enter at the invoice price with the intention of later furnishing him with the correct price as indicated by the investigation,' so that amendment of the entry could, be made. Before that could be done, however, the merchandise had come under the observation of the appraiser for the purpose of appraisement, and the advance, which resulted in the additional duties here sought to be remitted, was made.

We are satisfied that while the undervaluation in the present instance was the result of carelessness on the part of the petitioner’s employees or agents, it was not such wanton carelessness or disregard of the obligation not to deceive or mislead the Government officials as would be considered tantamount to wilful intention to defraud the revenue. The course of conduct of the petitioner’s employees' and agents and the frank assumption of blame taken at the trial negative any conclusion that actual intent to defraud the revenue existed, and on the record made judgment will issue granting the prayer of the petition.