alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1

                   UNITED CITIES GAS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

         COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF CONSOLIDATED EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

                           FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDED


(Unaudited, in thousands, except ratio amounts)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                            3-31-97  12-31-96  12-31-95  12-31-94  12-31-93  12-31-92
                                                            -------  --------  --------  --------  --------  --------
<S>                                                         <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>    
Fixed Charges, as defined:
   Interest on long-term debt ...........................   $14,418   $14,681   $13,697   $14,026   $14,553   $12,965
   Amortization of debt discount ........................       278       285       227       227       220       181
                                                            -------   -------   -------   -------   -------   -------
      Total .............................................   $14,696   $14,966   $13,924   $14,253   $14,773   $13,146
                                                            =======   =======   =======   =======   =======   =======
Earnings, as defined:
   Net income ...........................................   $15,793   $17,202   $ 9,935   $12,093   $12,150   $10,218
   Taxes on income ......................................     9,643    10,006     6,970     6,503     5,681     5,171
   Fixed charges, as above ..............................    14,696    14,966    13,924    14,253    14,773    13,146
                                                            -------   -------   -------   -------   -------   -------
      Total .............................................   $40,132   $42,174   $30,829   $32,849   $32,604   $28,535
                                                            =======   =======   =======   =======   =======   =======

Ratio of Consolidated Earnings to Fixed Charges .........      2.73      2.82      2.21      2.30      2.21      2.17
                                                            =======   =======   =======   =======   =======   =======
</TABLE>












































                                       15
**Exhibit 35.1**

 

ANNUAL SERVICER’S COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE

 

This Compliance Certificate is furnishedpursuant to Section 4.10 of the Sale and Servicing Agreement (the “Agreement”), dated as of March 30, 2016, by andamong Hyundai Auto Receivables Trust 2016-A, Hyundai Capital America, as seller and servicer (the “Servicer”), HyundaiABS Funding, LLC, as depositor, and Citibank, N.A., as indenture trustee and Item 1123 of Regulation AB. The undersigned herebycertifies that:

 

1)          Iam a duly authorized officer of the Servicer.

 

2)          Areview of the activities of the Servicer from January 1, 2018 through December 31, 2018 (the “Relevant Period”) andof the Servicer’s performance under the Agreement during the Relevant Period has been made under my supervision.

 

3)          Basedon such review, the Servicer has, to the best of my knowledge, fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all materialrespects throughout the Relevant Period.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have duly executed this Compliance Certificatethis 15th day of March, 2019.

 

 

** **
#### Pacific Trading Co., c/o Universal Foreign Service Co. et al. *v.*United States

No. 6082.

Invoices dated Tokyo, Japan, June 1, 1937, etc.

Certified June 2, 1937, etc.

Entered at Los Angeles, Calif., June 23, 1937, etc.

Entry No. 11455, etc.

(Decided January 9, 1945)

*Lawrence & Tuttle (George B. Tuttle*of counsel) for the plaintiffs.

*Paul P. Bao,*Assistant Attorney General *(Daniel I. Auster,*special attorney), for the defendant.

Ekwall, Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation entered into by the parties hereto:

> It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between counsel for plaintiffs and the Assistant Attorney General, attorney for the United States, subject to the approval of the court, as to merchandise covered by the reappraisement appeals listed in annexed schedule:

> (1) That this stipulation is limited to so much of said merchandise as is described in the invoices as clams in 5-ounce cans or tins, such items being marked A and initialed by Examiner *G. B. Guliclc,*and said article being appraised on the basis of the American selling price in accordance with the Presidential proclamation published in T. D. 47031.

> (2) That such merchandise is the same in all material respects as the imported clams involved in *United States*v. *Mutual Supply Co. et al.*and *Mutual Supply Co.*
>       *287
>       *et al.*v. *United States,*Reap. Dec. 5950, and that the issues herein are the same in all material respects as the issues involved in said decision.

> (3) That upon the dates of exportation to the United States of the merchandise covered by these appeals, like or similar merchandise manufectured or produced in the United States was being freely offered for sale and sold to all purchasers in the principal market of the United States in the ordinary course of trade and in the usual wholesale quantities, including all containers and coverings and all costs, charges, and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition packed ready for delivery, at the following prices per dozen cans or tins, •less a cash discount of 1)4 per centum:

> *6-ounce size*

> May 1, 1937, to March 15, 1941..... $1.00

> March 16, 1941, to June 30, 1941...__ 1.05

> (4) That the record in said Reap. Dec. 5950 may be incorporated herein and that upon this stipulation these appeals may be deemed submitted, they being limited to the items marked A on the invoices, and abandoned as to all other merchandise.

On the agreed facts I find that as to the 5-ounce tins marked A on the invoices and initialed by Examiner G. it. Gulick as set forth in the above stipulation, the American selling price as defined in section 402 (g) of the Tariff Act of 1930 is the proper basis for appraisement •and that such statutory values are as follows:

> Reappraisements 120919-A and 139887-A, $1.00 per dozen tins, less a cash discount of 1)4 per centum

> Reappraisement 141584-A, $1.05 per dozen tins, less a cash discount of 1)4 per centum

The appeals having been abandoned as to all other merchandise, they are dismissed insofar as they relate thereto.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
EXHIBIT 31.2


I, Christine R. Larson, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A of Trinity Learning
     Corporation;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
     a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
     statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
     were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
     report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this report, fairly present in all material
     respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
     the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
     establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
     in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

     a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
          disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
          supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
          registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
          us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
          which this report is being prepared;

     b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
          of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     c)   disclosed in this report any change in internal control over financial
          reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
          quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
          materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
          reporting;

5.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
     our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
     the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
     directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     a)   all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
          operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
          reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
          record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

     b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting.


Date:  December 22, 2004

       /S/ CHRISTINE R. LARSON
       -----------------------

       Christine R. Larson
       Chief Financial Officer
# C_2017256EN.01002102.xml

| 7.8.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 256/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.8.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 256/21

---

Judgment of the General Court of 21 June 2017 — City Train v EUIPO (CityTrain)

(Case T-699/15) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Application for EU figurative mark CityTrain - Procedural time limit - Unforeseeable circumstances - Absolute grounds for refusal - Descriptive character - Lack of distinctiveness - Article 7(1)(b) and (c) and (2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2017/C 256/22)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: City Train GmbH (Regensburg, Germany) (represented by: C. Adori, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: H. Kunz, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 9 September 2015 (Case R 843/2015-4) concerning an application for registration of figurative sign CityTrain as an EU trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders City Train GmbH to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders City Train GmbH to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 111, 29.3.2016.

1

---
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 190 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 190

     Recognizing the 100th anniversary of Mesa Verde National Park.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              July 1, 2005

   Mr. Salazar (for himself and Mr. Allard) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
     Recognizing the 100th anniversary of Mesa Verde National Park.

Whereas Mesa Verde National Park was created 100 years ago by an Act of Congress 
        and signed into law by President Theodore Roosevelt on June 29, 1906, as 
        the first National Park set aside to preserve the works of humankind;
Whereas the more than 5,000 archeological sites, including over 600 cliff 
        dwellings, protected within the 52,000-acre boundary of Mesa Verde 
        National Park represent some of the most spectacular and best-preserved 
        prehistoric architecture in the world;
Whereas in 1928, Congress declared the natural resources of Mesa Verde National 
        Park to be of such caliber as to be worthy of the same level of 
        protection as the cultural resources therein;
Whereas 8,500 acres within Mesa Verde National Park were designated as 
        wilderness by Congress on October 20, 1976;
Whereas on September 8, 1978, the United Nations Educational, Scientific, and 
        Cultural Organization (``UNESCO'') declared Mesa Verde National Park to 
        be 1 of 8 original World Cultural Heritage Sites;
Whereas Mesa Verde National Park is part of our American heritage that is 
        universally recognized and shared with the world;
Whereas Mesa Verde National Park is the primary driving force behind the economy 
        of southwestern Colorado and the Four Corners Region;
Whereas the communities of Cortez, Dolores, Mancos, and Durango, Colorado, have 
        come together to plan a year-long celebration worthy of this magnificent 
        icon of the National Park System; and
Whereas 24 American Indian tribes recognize Mesa Verde as their ancestral home 
        and contribute a rich cultural heritage to the experience of visitors to 
        the region: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) recognizes the 100th anniversary of Mesa Verde National 
        Park; and
            (2) urges all citizens of the United States to join in the 
        Centennial Celebration of Mesa Verde National Park by 
        participating in the many activities planned throughout the 
        year in 2006.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2016454EN.01002402.xml

| 5.12.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 454/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.12.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 454/24

---

Judgment of the General Court of 20 October 2016 — Clover Canyon v EUIPO — Kaipa Sportswear (CLOVER CANYON)

(Case T-693/15) (1)

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - International registration designating the European Union - Word mark CLOVER CANYON - Earlier national word mark CANYON - Relative ground for refusal - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Likelihood of confusion))

(2016/C 454/44)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Clover Canyon, Inc. (Los Angeles, California, United States) (represented by: T. Schmitz, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Ivanauskas and A. Folliard-Monguiral, Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Kaipa Sportswear GmbH (Heilbronn, Germany) (represented by: D. Pauli, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 4 August 2015 (Case R 3018/2014-5), relating to opposition proceedings between Kaipa Sportswear and Clover Canyon.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Clover Canyon, Inc. to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Clover Canyon, Inc. to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 38, 1.2.2016.

---
#### Heinrich Herrmann & Weiss, Inc. *v.*United States

No. 6425.

Entry No. 723001, etc.

Invoices dated London, England, September 16, 1941, etc.

Certified September 19, 1941, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., November 6, 1941, etc.

(Decided October 7, 1946)

*John D. Rode*for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Mollison, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
# C_2016156EN.01004001.xml

| 2.5.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 156/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.5.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 156/40

---

Judgment of the General Court of 17 March 2016 — Mudhook Marketing v OHIM (IPVanish)

(Case T-78/15) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Application for Community word mark IPVanish - Absolute ground for refusal - No distinctive character Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2016/C 156/52)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Mudhook Marketing, Inc. (Winter Park, Florida, United States) (represented by: H. Eckermann and A. Dellmeier, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: L. Rampini, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 4 December 2014 (Case R 1417/2014-2), relating to an application for registration of the word sign IPVanish as a Community trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Mudhook Marketing, Inc. to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mudhook Marketing, Inc. to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 127, 20.4.2015.

1

---
Hi my name is Tony Fuller. I'm a volunteer with the Sierra Club here in Chicago and have been 

concerned about the threat posed by carbon pollution and the resulting climate disruption. 

I would like to thank the US EPA & DOT for these second phase standards to reduce carbon 

pollution and oil use from heavy-duty freight trucks. However, these standards need to be 

strengthened to achieve at least a 40% reduction by 2025. The science shows that the 

technology exists to meet stronger standards. 

Strong 40% reduction standards are what I call a "no brainer" decision. Increased standards 

would yield additional health, economic and environmental benefits for minimal costs especially 

when you factor in the health benefits and long term threats posed by climate. Given the larger 

role the federal government has taken on in paying for health care costs I think monetary savings 

to the government is a factor that government should consider. 

Also the US EPA and DOT have a moral obligation to future generation adopt strong standards. 

We are in a race to prevent a global temperature rise of 2 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial 

times which would limit the impacts of climate change on the planet. Unfortunately, current plans 

by the Administration don't go far enough. According to Climate Action Tracker 

(climateactiontracker.org), a group of research organizations dedicated to analyzing the world's 

progress the U.S. action plans as being short of what's needed. By increasing these second 

phase standards to a 40% reduction we can take one more step towards limiting the impacts of 

climate change. Anything less endangers not only our own health and economic wellbeing but 

also the future for our families and the planet. 

Tony Fuller 

Chicago, IL 

ftone13@gmail.com
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 178 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 178

  Expressing the sense of the Congress that the United States should 
expand trade opportunities with Mongolia by initiating negotiations to 
            enter into a free trade agreement with Mongolia.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 28, 2007

Mr. Dreier (for himself, Mr. Hastert, Mr. Cole of Oklahoma, Mr. Pitts, 
     Mr. Putnam, and Mr. Rush) submitted the following concurrent 
   resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
  Expressing the sense of the Congress that the United States should 
expand trade opportunities with Mongolia by initiating negotiations to 
            enter into a free trade agreement with Mongolia.

Whereas Mongolia rejected 1-party Communist rule and embarked on democratic and 
        free-market reforms in 1990;
Whereas these reforms included privatizing state enterprises, lifting price 
        controls, and instituting fiscal discipline;
Whereas presidential and legislative elections have been held, with extremely 
        high voter turnout, since 1996;
Whereas Mongolia remains steadfastly committed to greater economic reforms;
Whereas Mongolia has been a member of the World Trade Organization since 1997;
Whereas in 1999 the United States provided permanent normal trade relations 
        treatment to the products of Mongolia;
Whereas the United States and Mongolia signed a bilateral Trade and Investment 
        Framework Agreement (TIFA) in 2004;
Whereas bilateral trade between the United States and Mongolia in 2006 was 
        valued at $137,000,000;
Whereas Mongolia has been an early political and logistical supporter of the 
        global war on terror, contributing troops, engineers, and medical 
        personnel to Operation Iraqi Freedom since April 2003, offering 
        overflight clearances for United States forces, and participating in 
        training artillery units of the Afghan National Army;
Whereas on August 6, 2002, the President signed into law H.R. 3009 (Public Law 
        107-210), the Trade Act of 2002, which provides for an expedited 
        procedure for congressional consideration of international trade 
        agreements; and
Whereas workers, consumers, business owners, and investors benefit substantially 
        from expanding and diversifying trade opportunities by reducing tariff 
        and nontariff barriers to trade: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),  
That it is the sense of the Congress that the United States should 
expand trade opportunities with Mongolia by initiating negotiations to 
enter into a free trade agreement with Mongolia.
                                 <all>
```