alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2015398EN.01008001.xml

| 30.11.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 398/80 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.11.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 398/80

---

Action brought on 22 September 2015 — ZZ v Commission

(Case F-125/15)

(2015/C 398/95)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: S. Orlandi and T. Martin, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the Commission’s decision not to promote the applicant to grade AD 8 in the 2014 promotion exercise and compensation for the non-material damage which the applicant claims to have suffered.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Tribunal should:

| — | annul the decision of the appointing authority of 14 November 2014 not to promote the applicant in the 2014 promotion exercise; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the appointing authority of 14 November 2014 not to promote the applicant in the 2014 promotion exercise;

| — | order the European Commission to pay EUR 15  000 by way of compensation for the non-material damage suffered; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the European Commission to pay EUR 15  000 by way of compensation for the non-material damage suffered;

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs.

---
# C_2015155EN.01001501.xml

| 11.5.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 155/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.5.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 155/15

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van beroep te Antwerpen (Belgium) lodged on 25 February 2015 — Sven Mathys v De Grave Antverpia NV

(Case C-92/15)

(2015/C 155/16)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Referring court

Hof van beroep te Antwerpen

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Sven Mathys

Applicant:

Defendant: De Grave Antverpia NV

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Is Article 3 of the Belgian Law of 5 May 1936 on inland waterway chartering compatible with Articles 1 and 2 of Directive 96/75/EC (1), in so far as a person who is not the owner or operator of an inland waterway vessel concludes a contract for the carriage of goods on inland waterways as carrier and is not acting as an agent (‘charterer’) within the meaning of Article 3 WBB?

1

---

(1)  Council Directive 96/75/EC of 19 November 1996 on the systems of chartering and pricing in national and international inland waterway transport in the Community (OJ 1996, L 304, p. 12).

1

---
110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 196 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), 

3 SECTION 1. USE OF ROTUNDA FOR GOLD MEDAL CERE4 MONY FOR DALAI LAMA. 

5 (a) USE OF ROTUNDA.—The Rotunda of the Capitol 

6 is authorized to be used on October 17, 2007, for a cere7 mony to award the Congressional Gold Medal to Tenzin 
2 

•HCON 196 EH 

1 Gyatso, the Fourteenth Dalai Lama, in accordance with 

2 Public Law 109–287. 

3 (b) PREPARATIONS.—Physical preparations for the 

4 ceremony referred to in subsection (a) shall be carried out 

5 in accordance with such conditions as the Architect of the 

6 Capitol may prescribe. 

7 SEC. 2. USE OF CAPITOL GROUNDS IN CONNECTION WITH 

8 CEREMONY. 

9 (a) IN GENERAL.—The International Campaign for 

10 Tibet (in this resolution referred to as the ‘‘sponsor’’) shall 

11 be permitted to sponsor a public event on the Capitol 

12 Grounds (in this resolution referred to as the ‘‘event’’) on 

13 October 17, 2007, in connection with the ceremony to be 

14 held in the rotunda of the Capitol under section 1. 

15 (b) TERMS AND CONDITIONS.— 

16 (1) IN GENERAL.—Under conditions to be pre17 scribed by the Architect of the Capitol and the Cap18 itol Police Board, the event shall be— 

19 (A) free of admission charge and open to 

20 the public; and 

21 (B) arranged not to interfere with the 

22 needs of Congress. 

23 (2) EXPENSES AND LIABILITIES.—The sponsor 

24 shall assume full responsibility for all expenses and 
3 

•HCON 196 EH 

1 liabilities incident to all activities associated with the 

2 event. 

3 (c) EVENT PREPARATIONS.—Subject to the approval 

4 of the Architect of the Capitol, the sponsor is authorized 

5 to erect upon the Capitol Grounds such stage, sound am6 plification devices, and other related structures and equip7 ment, as may be required for the event. 

8 (d) ENFORCEMENT OF RESTRICTIONS.—The Capitol 

9 Police Board shall provide for enforcement of the restric10 tions contained in section 5104(c) of title 40, United 

11 States Code, concerning sales, advertisements, displays, 

12 and solicitations on the Capitol Grounds, as well as other 

13 restrictions applicable to the Capitol Grounds, in connec14 tion with the event. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 4, 

2007. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 196 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Authorizing the use of the Rotunda and grounds of 

teenth Dalai Lama. sional Gold Medal to Tenzin Gyatso, the Fourthe Capitol for a ceremony to award the Congres-
OXIDES OF SULFUR ANNUAL EMISSION REPORT

Intermountain Power Service Corporation Company ID - 240

Intermountain Generation Station Site ID - 10327

SUMMARY OF ANNUAL SOx EMISSIONS SUBMITTED TO EPA FOR ACID RAIN PROGRAM

Component Company Adjusted

ID ID Component 1999 2006 Actuals

2381 1.0 Utility Boiler-Coal fired 1566.4 2240.7 2229.5

2382 2.0 Utility Boiler Coal Fired 2131.8 2019.6 2009.5

2399 21.0 Aux. Boilers 1A & 1B See below 4260.3 4239

7237 1.0a Utility Boiler Start-up See below 1.97 1.97

7239 2.0a Utility Boiler Start-up See below 4262.27 4240.97

CHANGES IN MONITORING OR CALCULATION METHODS

Component Company

ID ID

2381 1.0

Component Company

ID ID

2382 2.0

Component Company

ID ID Component

2399 21.0

Component

Utility Boiler-Coal fired

Explanation of Change:

Adjustment of 2006 emissions to be comparable to 1999 emissions:

2006 SO2 emissions with WAF=0.995 (2229.5 tons) as reported in Part 75 EDR

Wall Adjustment Factor (WAF) of 0.995 used on Flow RATA.

Component

Utility Boiler Coal Fired

Explanation of Change:

2229.5/0.995 = 2240.7 tons adjusted.

Adjustment of 2006 emissions to be comparable to 1999 emissions:

2006 SO2 emissions with WAF=0.995 (2009.5 tons) as reported in Part 75 EDR

Wall Adjustment Factor (WAF) of 0.995 used on Flow RATA.

Aux. Boilers 1A & 1B

Explanation of Change:

2009.5/0.995 = 2019.6 tons adjusted.
Component Company

ID ID

7237 1.0a

Adjustment of 2006 emissions to be comparable to 1999 emissions:

Component

Utility Boiler Start-up

Explanation of Change:

Adjustment of 2006 emissions to be comparable to 1999 emissions:

These emissions are reported as part of Component ID. 2381 
Component Company

ID ID

7239 2.0a

Component

Utility Boiler Start-up

Adjustment of 2006 emissions to be comparable to 1999 emissions:

Explanation of Change:

These emisssions are reported as part of Component ID. 2382
Change Adjustments

11.2 2240.7

10.1 2019.6

21.3 4260.3

1.97

21.3 4262.27
No. 44212.

#### Protest 886814-G of A. Hirschberger (New York).

Opinion by

Bbown, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of bodies, hoods, forms, or shapes similar to that the subject of *Cohn*v. *United States*(4 Cust. Ct. 166, C. D. 314). The protest was sustained accordingly.
The **NCEI Trackline Geophysical Data** map viewer has recently moved.  It is now hosted at https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/maps/geophysics/.

Any references or bookmarks will need to be updated.  We apologize for any inconvenience.

You should be automatically redirected in 7 seconds.
# Official Journal L 261/2016

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 261 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5928 September 2016 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 261

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5928 September 2016

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Regulation (EU) 2016/1725 of 23 September 2016 establishing a prohibition of fishing for undulate ray in Union waters of VIId by vessels flying the flag of France | 1 |
| | * | Commission Regulation (EU) 2016/1726 of 27 September 2016 amending Annex IV to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards carvone, diammonium phosphate, Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain LAS02 and whey (
  1
  ) | 3 |
| | | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1727 of 27 September 2016 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables | 5 |
| | | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1728 of 27 September 2016 fixing the allocation coefficient to be applied to the quantities covered by applications for import licences lodged from 8 to 14 September 2016 under the tariff quotas opened by Regulation (EC) No 891/2009 in the sugar sector and suspending submission of applications for such licences | 7 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Regulation (EU) 2016/1725 of 23 September 2016 establishing a prohibition of fishing for undulate ray in Union waters of VIId by vessels flying the flag of France

1

*

Commission Regulation (EU) 2016/1726 of 27 September 2016 amending Annex IV to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards carvone, diammonium phosphate, Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain LAS02 and whey (
  1
  )

Saccharomyces cerevisiae

1

3

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1727 of 27 September 2016 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

5

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1728 of 27 September 2016 fixing the allocation coefficient to be applied to the quantities covered by applications for import licences lodged from 8 to 14 September 2016 under the tariff quotas opened by Regulation (EC) No 891/2009 in the sugar sector and suspending submission of applications for such licences

7

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
#### Phinney, *Petitioner for a writ of Habeas Corpus.*

To justify the discharge, upon *Habeas*Corpus, of a respondent, imprisoned by a justice’s mittimus to enforce the payment of a fine for unlawfully selling spirituous liquors, it is not sufficient that the mittimus fails to state the name of the purchaser, or the quantity sold, or the time and place of the sale; or that there was a prosecutor; *provided,,*the mittimus shows the offence to be one for which the justice has jurisdiction to impose a fine.

Neither, to justify such a discharge, is it sufficient that the justice erroneously ordered the fine to be paid to *the State.*

This was an application for a writ of *Habeas Corpus,*to bring Phinney into court, because illegally imprisoned' in the public jail.

He was held in custody, by virtue of a warrant .of commitment, issued by a justice of the peace.

The matters recited in the] mittimus were, that said Phinney had been found guilty, by said justice, of violating the provisions of the statute relative to the sale of intoxicating liquors, and had been ordered by the said justice to pay a fine of ten dollars to the State and costs of prosecution.

*A. B. Holden,*for the petitioner.

*441The mittimus was insufficient, because —

1st. It did not show that the process was originated upon the *complaint*of any person.

2d. It did not recite the time when, the place where, the person to whom, or the quantity in which, the intoxicating drinks were sold.

3d. The fine imposed, was illegal, because it was ordered to be paid to the *State,*whereas the stat. (chap. 202, sec. 6,) declares, that one half of the fine, so recovered, shall enure to the prosecutor, or complainant, and the other half to the town where the offence is committed. *Commonwealth*v. *Ward,*4 Mass. 497; *Bridge*v. *Ford,*4 Mass. 641 ; *Ex parte Watkins,*3 Peters, 193.

Shepley, C. J.,

orally.

1. It is objected that the mittimus does not show that there, was a prosecutor, or who was the purchaser of the liquor, or when or where, or in what quantity it was sold. In support of the objection, the petitioner’s counsel has cited 4 Mass. 497 and 641. The former case has no applicability, because the offence there charged was one of which the magistrate had jurisdiction, not to render a final judgment, but merely to bind over. In the latter case, the recognizance did not present, enough to show that the justice had any jurisdiction whatever. But in this petitioner’s case, it is shown that the of-fence, of which he was convicted, was within the justice’s jurisdiction.

2. The sentence was, that the petitioner pay a fine to the State. This was erroneous, still the judgment is valid until reversed. If it were here upon a *certiorari,*the erroneous part might be reversed, leaving the penalty unappropriated. But the petitioner is not injured by the misappropriation. On paying the fine and cost, he would be discharged. That is enough for him. *State*v. *Stinson,*17 Maine, *154; Ricker, petitioner,*31 Maine, 37.

The petitioner, if present on *Habeas Corpus,*could not be discharged. *Petition withdrawn.*
# C_2015279EN.01005402.xml

| 24.8.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 279/54 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.8.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 279/54

---

Order of the President of the Civil Service Tribunal of 15 July 2015 — Wolff v EEAS

(Case F-94/15 R)

((Civil Service - Interim measures - Application for a suspension of operation - Elections to the Staff Committee - Urgency - Absence - Balance of the interests at stake))

(2015/C 279/69)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Oren Wolff (Etterbeek, Belgium) (represented by: S. Orlandi and T. Martin, lawyers)

Defendant: European External Action Service (represented by: G.-J. Van Hegelsom, S. Marquardt and E. Chaboureau, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of the decision rejecting the applicant’s challenge to the results of the elections to the Staff Committee of the EEAS.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | Mr Wolff’s application for interim measures is rejected. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Mr Wolff’s application for interim measures is rejected.

| 2. | The costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The costs are reserved.

---
# C_2015213EN.01004602.xml

| 29.6.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 213/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.6.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 213/46

---

Action brought on 20 April 2015 — ZZ v European Commission

(Case F-57/15)

(2015/C 213/75)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: S. Orlandi and T. Martin, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Application for, first, a declaration that Article 9 of the general provisions implementing Article 11(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations of 3 March 2011 (GIP) is illegal and, secondly, annulment of the decision confirming the transfer of the pension rights acquired by the applicant to the EU institutions pensions scheme in accordance with the new GIP.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Tribunal should:

| — | declare that Article 9 of the general provisions implementing Article 11(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations is illegal; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that Article 9 of the general provisions implementing Article 11(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations is illegal;

| — | annul the decision of 18 September 2014 to credit the pension rights acquired by the applicant prior to his entry into service, in the context of the transfer of those rights to the EU institutions pension scheme, in accordance with the general provisions implementing Article 11(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations of 3 March 2011; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of 18 September 2014 to credit the pension rights acquired by the applicant prior to his entry into service, in the context of the transfer of those rights to the EU institutions pension scheme, in accordance with the general provisions implementing Article 11(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations of 3 March 2011;

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs.

---
Before the First Division,

May 6, 1944

No. 49390.

#### Petition 6379-R of Victor Maneghetti (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

The petition was dismissed.
(logo) Rialto

CAPITAL

 

 

**2018 Annual Statement of Servicer Compliance (Item1123)**

 

 

Pooling and ServicingAgreement (the " Pooling and Servicing Agreement") dated as of May 1,2016 by and among CCRE Commercial Mortgage Securities, L.P. as Depositor, WellsFargo Bank, National Association as Master Servicer, Rialto Capital Advisors,LLC as Special Servicer, Park Bridge Lender Services LLC as Operating Advisorand Asset Representations Reviewer, U.S. Bank National Association as Trustee,Certificate Administrator and Paying Agent, and U.S. Bank National Associationas Custodian, relating to the CFCRE 2016-C4 Mortgage Trust, Commercial MortgagePass-through Certificates, Series 2016-C4 **(CFCRE 2016-C4)**

 

The undersigned, a dulyauthorized officer of Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as special servicer (the"Special Servicer") herein certifies to the following:

 

1.       All servicing activities and performance of suchservicing activities under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement are performed onbehalf of the Special Servicer.

 

2.       A review of the servicing activities and performance bythe Special Servicer for the period of January 1, 2018 through December 31,2018 (the "Reporting Period"), under the Pooling and ServicingAgreement has been conducted under my supervision.

 

3.       To the best of my knowledge, based on suchreview, the Special Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under theterms of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, in all material respectsthroughout the Reporting Period and if there has been a failure to fulfill anysuch obligations in any material respect, each failure and the nature andstatus thereof has been specifically identified herein.

 

 

Certified by: /s/ Adam Singer

Adam Singer, ManagingDirector 

 

Date: March 1, 2019
# C_2016371EN.01003504.xml

| 10.10.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 371/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.10.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 371/35

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 29 August 2016 — Marinozzi and Cat v Commission

(Case F-128/15) (1)

1

(2016/C 371/45)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 414, 14/12/2015, p. 43.

1

---
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

In connection withthis quarterly report of Torotel, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ending July 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Dale H. Sizemore, Jr.,Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, thatto my knowledge:

 

(1)                      The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                      The information contained in this Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Dale H.  Sizemore, Jr. |   |
|---------------------------------|--------|
|                            |
|                            |
| Dale H.  Sizemore, Jr.     |
| Chief Executive Officer         |
| September 15, 2008         |

#####  

#####
III 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 625 

Extending the authority for the Senate National Security Working Group. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 6, 2006 

Mr. FRIST (for himself and Mr. REID) submitted the following resolution; 

which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Extending the authority for the Senate National Security 

Working Group. 

1 Resolved, That Senate Resolution 105 of the One 

2 Hundred First Congress, 1st session (agreed to on April 

3 13, 1989), as amended by Senate Resolution 149 of the 

4 One Hundred Third Congress, 1st session (agreed to on 

5 October 5, 1993), as further amended by Senate Resolu6 tion 75 of the One Hundred Sixth Congress, 1st session 

7 (agreed to on March 25, 1999), as further amended by 

8 Senate Resolution 383 of the One Hundred Sixth Con9 gress, 2d session (agreed to on October 27, 2000), as fur10 ther amended by Senate Resolution 355 of the One Hun11 dred Seventh Congress, 2d session (agreed to on NovemVerDate Aug 31 2005 00:35 Dec 08, 2006 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\SR625.ATS SR625

jcorcoran on PRODPC62 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 625 ATS 

1 ber 13, 2002), and as further amended by Senate Resolu2 tion 480 of the One Hundred Eighth Congress, 2d session 

3 (agreed to November 20, 2004), is further amended in sec4 tion 4 by striking ‘‘2006’’ and inserting ‘‘2008’’. 

Æ 


jcorcoran on PRODPC62 with BILLS
No. 54259.

#### Marks & Rosenfeld, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 153066-K (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial it was stipulated that the issues and facts herein are similar to those involved in *United States*v. *Browne Vintners Co., Inc.*(34 C. C. P. A. 112, C. A. D. 351) and that the quantities reported by the inspector as manifested and not found were in fact not landed. In accordance with stipulation and following the decision cited it was held that the merchandise, insofar as it involves the quantities reported by the inspector as manifested and not found, is subject to an allowance in duties. The protest was sustained to this extent.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 6, 2013

No. 04-13-00430-CV

John F. DAVIS,

Appellant

v.

FARIAS ENTERPRISES LTD.,

Appellee

From the 341st Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2010-CVT-001822D3

Honorable Rebecca Ramirez Palomo, Judge Presiding

ORDER

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED FOR WANT 

OF JURISDICTION. 

We ORDER that appellee Farias Enterprises Ltd. recover its costs of this appeal, if any, 

from appellant John F. Davis.

It is so ORDERED on November 6, 2013.

_____________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 6th day of November, 2013.

_____________________________

Keith E. Hottle, Clerk