alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Practicability of Attaining 2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS by December 31, 2015

Site Name Site ID 2012 98% 2013 98% 2014 98%

Preliminary 

2015 98%

Preliminary 

2015 DV

2015 

Quarters 

in AQS

Max 2015 98% 

allowed to attain 

2006 24-hr NAAQS 

(65.4) in 2015

Year of 

Lowest 

valid 

98%

Lowest valid 

98%, '99-'14

% Difference 

between Max 

2015 and lowest 

98%

2006 NAAQS 

attainment 

practicable in 

2015?

Fresno-Garland 060190011 52.6 63.8 66.7 64.3 64.9 2 -24.3 2010 48.8 150% No

Bakersfield-California Ave 060290014 56.4 71.8 79.9 67.1 72.9 2 -45.5 2010 53.3 185% No

Bakersfield-Planz 060290016 40.6 96.7 76.7 64.3 79.2 2 -67.2 2012 40.6 266% No

Hanford 060311004 48.3 67.6 81.9 n/a 74.8 0 -43.3 2012 48.3 190% No

Fresno-Pacific (Winery) 060195025 42.8 71.6 61.8 54.2 62.5 2 -27.2 2010 37.0 174% No

Madera City 060392010 43.2 54.6 56.0 30.6 47.1 1 -4.4 2010 43.2 110% No

2014 98th percentile data for Bakersfield-Planz is based on three quarters of 2014 data, as the second quarter of 2014 data has 73% completeness. 

The 2003 98th percentile for Bakersfield-California Ave, 46.4 μg/m3, is not considered valid since Q3 and Q4 are incomplete. Thus, the minimum value is 53.3 μg/m3 from 2010. 

Preliminary 2015 98th percentiles selected from data in AQS as of November 16, 2015. Practicability of attainment in 2015 is from comparing max 2015 98% allowed to lowest values seen during 

1999-2014. For all sites, the maximum allowed is considerably smaller than the lowest value seen historically, so attainment is impracticable.

2012 - 2015 98th percentiles from AQS Data Query: 2015-11-16 (AQS Design Value Report, AMP480; see "SJV_DVReport_2012-2015_PM2.5-2006std_11162015").
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGECOMMISSION

Washington,D.C. 20549

** **

**FORM10-Q**

(Mark One)

 

[**X**]	Quarterly Reportunder Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 

 

For thequarterly period ended **June 30, 2016**or 

 

[ ]	Transition report pursuantto Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

 

CommissionFile No. **0-3978**

 

**UNICO AMERICAN CORPORATION**

*(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified inIts Charter)*

 

**             Nevada                                                                    95-2583928**

*(State or Other Jurisdiction of                                            (I.R.S. Employee*

*Incorporation or Organization)                                               Identification No.)*

 

**26050 MureauRoad, Calabasas, California 91302**

*(Address ofPrincipal Executive Offices) (Zip Code)*

 

**(818) 591-9800**

*(Registrant's Telephone Number, IncludingArea Code)*

 

**No Change****

*(FormerName, Former Address and Former Fiscal Year, if Changed Since Last Report)*

 

Indicateby check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports),and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X		No __  

 

Indicateby check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every InteractiveData File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for suchshorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes X	No__  

** **

Indicateby check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smallerreporting company.  See the definitions of “large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" and "smallerreporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.  (Check one):

 

Large accelerated filer __ 	Acceleratedfiler __

 

Non-accelerated filer __	Smallerreporting company X 

(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

 

Indicateby check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes  No  X 

 

Indicate the number of sharesoutstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

 

 

1 of 25 

 

 

 **PART1 - FINANCIAL INFORMATION**

 

ITEM 1  - FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

UNICO AMERICAN CORPORATION

AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

 

 

  

See condensed notes to unaudited consolidatedfinancial statements.

 

2 of 25 

 

 

UNICO AMERICAN CORPORATION

AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(UNAUDITED)
# C_2015294EN.01001702.xml

| 7.9.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 294/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.9.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 294/17

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny (Poland) lodged on 19 May 2015 — Minister Finansów v Jan Mateusiak

(Case C-229/15)

(2015/C 294/23)

Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Referring court

Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Minister Finansów

Applicant:

Defendant: Jan Mateusiak

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Must Article 18(c) of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (1) be interpreted as meaning that, on expiry of the adjustment period referred to in Article 187 of the directive, a taxable person’s fixed assets upon the acquisition of which he deducted VAT, should not be subject to tax and included in the winding-up inventory at the time he ceases his activity, if the period laid down in law for adjusting the input tax on the acquisition thereof, which arises from the estimated period for using those assets in the taxable person’s economic activity, has passed, or as meaning that the fixed assets are subject to tax at the time the taxable person ceases his economic activity, regardless of the adjustment period?

1

---

(1)  OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1.

1

---
#### Adams *& al. versus*Hardy *& al.*

A person, who writes Ms name upon the back of a promissory note, may be held as a promisor jorntly with the one who subscribes Ms name on the face of the note.

Assumpsit, upon a promissory note against two defendants as joint promisors. The name of one of them was subscribed to the *note;*the name of the other was written upon the back of it. The defendant contended that they were not chargeable as joint promisors. Tenney, J., before whom the trial was had, overruled the defendants’ position. The verdict was for the plaintiffs, and exceptions were filed.

*Kelley,*for the defendants.

The practice in Massachusetts violates that essential principle, that a contract shall be construed according to the intent of the parties. It has been exploded in New York and by Judge Story. The English decisions are all against it. If it has not been adopted here, it is of importance that it should not be.

One who writes his name on the back of a note, is a *backer,*ari indorser. He is made a second indorser, the moment the payee indorses it, and he ought not to be charged as an original promisor.

*Hubbard,*for the plaintiff.

Wells, J.

Exceptions overruled, and judgment on the verdict.
The **Natural Hazards Data** map viewer has recently moved.  It is now hosted at https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/maps/hazards/.

Any references or bookmarks will need to be updated.  We apologize for any inconvenience.

You should be automatically redirected in 7 seconds.
No. 64350.

protest 58/5550 (New York).

#### J. M. P. R. Trading Corp. and Alltransport, Inc. *v.*United States,

*522Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with, stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of monofilament fishing lines the same in all material respects as those the subject of Abstract 60183, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
# C_2016475EN.01001502.xml

| 19.12.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 475/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.12.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 475/15

---

Order of the President of the Court of 13 October 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato — Italy) — Regione autonoma della Sardegna v Comune di Portoscuso, interveners: Saromar Gestioni Srl, Giulio Pistis

(Case C-449/15) (1)

1

(2016/C 475/24)

Language of the case: Italian

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 381, 16.11.2015.

1

---
# C_2017129EN.01001702.xml

| 24.4.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 129/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.4.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 129/17

---

Judgment of the General Court of 14 March 2017 — Bank Tejarat v Council

(Case T-346/15) (1)

1

((Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures taken against Iran with the aim of preventing nuclear proliferation - Freezing of funds - Re-listing of the applicant - Obligation to state reasons - Manifest error of assessment - Res judicata - Misuse of powers - Fundamental rights))

(2017/C 129/28)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Bank Tejarat (Tehran, Iran) (represented by: S. Zaiwalla, P. Reddy, A. Meskarian, Solicitors, M. Brindle QC, and R. Blakeley, Barrister)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bishop and A. Vitro, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application pursuant to Article 263 TFEU for annulment of Council Decision (CFSP) 2015/556 of 7 April 2015 amending Council Decision 2010/413/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Iran (OJ 2015 L 92, p. 101), and of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/549 of 7 April 2015 implementing Regulation (EU) No 267/2012 concerning restrictive measures against Iran (OJ 2015 L 92, p. 12), in so far as they concern the applicant.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Bank Tejarat to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Bank Tejarat to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 302, 14.9.2015.

1

---
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 522 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 522

 Celebrating the 150th anniversary of the cities of Bristol, Tennessee 
                         and Bristol, Virginia.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 27, 2006

   Mr. Frist (for himself, Mr. Alexander, Mr. Warner, and Mr. Allen) 
 submitted the following resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Celebrating the 150th anniversary of the cities of Bristol, Tennessee 
                         and Bristol, Virginia.

Whereas the twin cities of Bristol, Tennessee and Bristol, Virginia were 
        officially chartered in 1856, celebrated the Bristol Centennial in 1956, 
        and have organized to celebrate the Bristol Sesquicentennial in 2006;
Whereas the Bristol Sesquicentennial theme, ``Celebrating 150 Years of Heritage 
        and Harmony'' underscores the duality of Bristol as a cohesion of 2 
        separate cities with 1 communal spirit;
Whereas the ``Bristol Sign'', listed in the National Register of Historic 
        Places, serves to exemplify the communal spirit of Bristol, bridge the 
        States of Tennessee and Virginia over the cooperatively named ``State 
        Street'', and declare Bristol ``A Good Place to Live'';
Whereas the people of Bristol continue to work to preserve structures of 
        historical significance, including the Paramount Theatre, the Old 
        Customs House, and the historic train station;
Whereas the phonographic recordings known as the Bristol Sessions launched the 
        country music careers of the Carter Family, the Stonemans, and Jimmie 
        Rogers, and prompted historians to describe Bristol as the ``Big Bang'' 
        of modern country music;
Whereas country music is a central part of the history of Bristol, which 
        Congress recognized as the ``Birthplace of Country Music'';
Whereas the history and economic development of Bristol is intimately tied to 
        commercial transportation and Bristol countinues to serve as an 
        important commercial hub for the surrounding region; and
Whereas automotive racing is integral to the identity of Bristol and the 
        ``World's Fastest Half-Mile'' at the Bristol Motor Speedway continues to 
        offer exciting events to scores of racing fans: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) acknowledges the cultural and historic achievements of 
        the people of Bristol, Tennessee and Bristol, Virginia; and
            (2) congratulates the twin cities of Bristol on their 
        sesquicentennial.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2015127EN.01004001.xml

| 20.4.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 127/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.4.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 127/40

---

Action brought on 26 January 2015 — ZZ v European Commission

(Case F-15/15)

(2015/C 127/55)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: M. Mock, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decisions of the defendant fixing the flat-rate payment corresponding to the cost of travel from the place of employment to the place of origin pursuant to Article 8 of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations, as amended by Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1023/2013 of 22 October 2013.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Tribunal should:

| — | annul salary statements 6/2014 and 7/2014 in the form of the decision of the defendant of 15 October 2014, notified on 17 October 2014, in so far as it fixes the flat-rate payment corresponding to the cost of travel from the place of employment to the place of origin; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul salary statements 6/2014 and 7/2014 in the form of the decision of the defendant of 15 October 2014, notified on 17 October 2014, in so far as it fixes the flat-rate payment corresponding to the cost of travel from the place of employment to the place of origin;

| — | in the event of annulment, oblige the defendant to adjust the flat-rate payment with due regard to the grounds underlying the annulment; |
| --- | --- |

—

in the event of annulment, oblige the defendant to adjust the flat-rate payment with due regard to the grounds underlying the annulment;

| — | decide on the costs in accordance with the applicable provisions. |
| --- | --- |

—

decide on the costs in accordance with the applicable provisions.

---
EXHIBIT 32.2
 
 
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
 SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In connection with the quarterly report of United-Guardian, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Robert S. Rubinger, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (i) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (ii) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented and results of operations of the Company for the periods presented.
 
 
 Date:  August 12, 2009                                                                          By: /s/
Robert S. Rubinger
 Robert S. Rubinger
| (logo) WELLS  FARGO | **Commercial  Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084,  8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334

 

  |
|---------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

 

Reference is hereby made to that certainTrust and Servicing Agreement dated as of March 1, 2016, by and among DEUTSCHEMORTGAGE & ASSET RECEIVING CORPORATION, as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK,NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer and Special Servicer, WILMINGTONTRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, and DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANYAMERICAS, as Certificate Administrator, Paying Agent and Custodian with respectto Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, COMM 2016-787S (the"Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise definedshall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 11.07 of thisAgreement, I, Daniel Marthinsen, Managing Director of Special Servicing dohereby certify that:

 

1.       Areview of the activities of the Special Servicer during the period from January1, 2018 through December 31, 2018 (the “Reporting Period”), and of itsperformance per the Agreement during such period has been made under mysupervision, and

 

2.       Tothe best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Special Servicer hasfulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respectsthroughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned hasexecuted this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2019.

 

 

/s/Daniel Marthinsen

DanielMarthinsen, Managing Director 

WellsFargo Bank

 

 

| Wells  Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together  we’ll go far |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

May 14, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-20860

Summary Calendar

 

EMILIO GONZALEZ-MONTERREY,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

BUREAU OF IMMIGRATION AND 

CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT,

Respondent-Appellee.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

(H-01-CV-3014)

--------------------

Before DAVIS, WIENER, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Petitioner-Appellant Emilio Gonzalez-Monterrey (“Gonzalez”),

immigration detainee number A24787029, appeals the district court’s

denial of his 21 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas petition challenging the

right of the Immigration and Naturalization Service to detain him

indefinitely in light of the Supreme Court decision in Zadvydas v.

Davis, 533 U.S. 678 (2001). Gonzalez is an excludable alien who is

a Cuban national.
In Zadvydas, the Supreme Court set up a framework in which

a deportable alien could establish the unreasonableness of his

continued detention and obtain his release, albeit supervised, in a

habeas corpus proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. 533 U.S. at 701.

Gonzalez’s argument that Zadvydas should apply equally to

excludable aliens like himself is foreclosed by our decision in

Rios v. INS, ___ F.3d ___ (5th Cir. Jan. 28, 2003, No. 02-40766),

2003 WL 734159 at *1. Gonzalez’s petition is governed by our

holding in Gisbert v. U.S. Atty. Gen., 988 F.2d 1437, 1440-47 (5th

Cir.), amended by Gisbert v. U.S. Atty. Gen., 997 F.2d 1122 (5th

Cir. 1993), that there are no time limits on the detention of

excluded aliens who have been denied entry. See Rios, 2003 WL

734159 at *1. The district court did not err in denying the

petition.

AFFIRMED.
# C_2017014EN.01000902.xml

| 16.1.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 14/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.1.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 14/9

---

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 10 November 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sø- og Handelsretten — Denmark) — Ferring Lægemidler A/S, acting on behalf of Ferring BV v Orifarm A/S

(Case C-297/15) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Trade marks - Directive 2008/95/EC - Article 7(2) - Medicinal products - Parallel import - Partitioning of the markets - Need for the repackaging of the product bearing the mark - Medicinal product placed on the exporting market and importing market by the trade mark proprietor with the same kind of packaging))

(2017/C 014/12)

Language of the case: Danish

Referring court

Sø- og Handelsretten

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Ferring Lægemidler A/S, acting on behalf of Ferring BV

Defendant: Orifarm A/S

Operative part of the judgment

Article 7(2) of Directive 2008/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2008 to approximate the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks must be interpreted as meaning that a trade mark proprietor may object to the continued marketing of a medicinal product by a parallel importer, where that importer has repackaged that medicinal product in a new, outer packaging and reaffixed the trade mark, where, first, the medicinal product at issue can be marketed in the importing State party to the EEA Agreement, of 2 May 1992, in the same packaging as that in which it is marketed in the exporting State party to the EEA Agreement and, second, the importer has not demonstrated that the imported product can only be marketed in a limited part of the importing State’s market, and those are matters which it is for the referring court to determine.

---

(1)  
  OJ C 294, 7.9.2015.

---
110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 164 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That the Rotunda of the Capitol is authorized 

3 to be used on July 17, 2007, for a ceremony to award 

4 the Congressional Gold Medal to Dr. Norman E. Borlaug. 

5 Physical preparations for the ceremony shall be carried 
2 

•HCON 164 EH 

1 out in accordance with such conditions as the Architect 

2 of the Capitol may prescribe. 

Passed the House of Representatives June 12, 2007. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 164 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Authorizing the use of the Rotunda of the Capitol 

Medal to Dr. Norman E. Borlaug. for a ceremony to award the Congressional Gold
Finding of No Significant Impact Solar Technology Center

January 2009Finding of No Significant Impact Solar Technology Center

January 2009Finding of No Significant Impact Solar Technology Center

January 2009