alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 142 

Expressing the sense of the Congress that there should be established a 

National Pet Week. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 3, 2007 

Mr. SHAYS (for himself, Mr. LANTOS, Ms. ZOE LOFGREN of California, Mr. 

DEFAZIO, Mr. MOORE of Kansas, and Mr. KIRK) submitted the following 

concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight 

and Government Reform 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the Congress that there should be 

established a National Pet Week. 

Whereas May 6 to May 12, 2007, marks 26th anniversary of 

‘‘National Pet Week’’, sponsored by the American Veterinary Medical Association and the Auxiliary to the American Veterinary Medical Association; 

Whereas animals and pets give companionship and pleasure 

in daily living, share the homes of nearly 69,000,000 individuals or families in the United States, and provide 

special benefits to elderly persons and children; 

Whereas the people of the United States have a firm commitment to promote responsible care of animals and pets 

and guard against cruel and irresponsible treatment; 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
2 

•HCON 142 IH 

Whereas teaching kindness and respect for all living animals 

through education in schools and communities is essential 

to the basic values of a humane and civilized society; 

Whereas the people of the United States are grateful to the 

veterinary medical profession for providing preventive 

and emergency medical care and assistance to animals, 

spaying and neutering animals to combat overpopulation, 

and contributing to the education of animal owners; and 

Whereas the people of the United States are indebted to animal protection organizations, State humane organizations, and local animal care and control agencies for promoting respect for animals and pets, educating children 

about humane attitudes, and caring for lost, unwanted, 

abused, and abandoned animals: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress— 

3 (1) that there should be established a National 

4 Pet Week; and 

5 (2) the people of the United States should ob6 serve National Pet Week with appropriate cere7 monies and activities. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
The **Bathymetric Data** map viewer has recently moved.  It is now hosted at https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/maps/bathymetry/.

Any references or bookmarks will need to be updated.  We apologize for any inconvenience.

You should be automatically redirected in 7 seconds.
# C_2015302EN.01002501.xml

| 14.9.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 302/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.9.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 302/25

---

Action brought on 13 July 2015 — European Commission v Kingdom of Belgium

(Case C-356/15)

(2015/C 302/32)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: D. Martin, acting as Agent)

Applicant:

Defendant: Kingdom of Belgium

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Declare that by adopting Articles 23 and 24 of the programme law of 27 December 2012, the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 11, 12 and 76(6) of Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the coordination of social security systems, Article 5 of Regulation (EC) No 987/2009 (2) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 September 2009 laying down the procedure for implementing Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 and Decision Al of the Administrative Commission for the Coordination of Social Security Systems (3). |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare that by adopting Articles 23 and 24 of the programme law of 27 December 2012, the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 11, 12 and 76(6) of Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the coordination of social security systems, Article 5 of Regulation (EC) No 987/2009 (2) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 September 2009 laying down the procedure for implementing Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 and Decision Al of the Administrative Commission for the Coordination of Social Security Systems (3).

1

2

3

| — | order the Kingdom of Belgium to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Kingdom of Belgium to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

With the adoption of Articles 23 and 24 of the programme law of 27 December 2012, the Commission considers that the Kingdom of Belgium has infringed Articles 11, 12 and 76 of Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 and Article 5 of Regulation (EC) No 987/2009 laying down the procedure for implementing Regulation (EC) No 883/2004, and Decision Al of the Administrative Commission for the Coordination of Social Security Systems by failing to recognise the binding nature of a document issued by the Member State of origin of a posted worker attesting that he is subject to the social security legislation of that Member State.

---

(1)  OJ 2004 L 166, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ 2009 L 284, p. 1.

2

(3)  OJ C 106 of 24.4.2010, p. 1.

3

---
# C_2016364EN.01003801.xml

| 3.10.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 364/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.10.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 364/38

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 19 July 2016 — Stips v Commission

(Case F-131/15) (1)

((Civil Service - Member of the temporary staff paid from research and investment appropriations - Article 2(d) CEOS - Contract of indefinite duration - Reclassification in the higher grade - 2013 reclassification round - Closure of the round after 1 January 2014 - Entry into force of Regulation No 1023/2013 - Methods of accessing grade AD 13 - Application, by analogy, of Article 45(1) and of point 1 of Section A of Annex I of the Staff Regulations - Refusal to reclassify an AD 12 member of the temporary staff - Suitability for reclassification - Principles of legal certainty and non-retroactivity - Right to good administration))

(2016/C 364/46)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Adolf Stips (Besozzo, Italy) (represented by: S. Orlandi and T. Martin, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Berscheid and C. Berardis-Kayser, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of the Commission’s decision not to reclassify the applicant as grade AD 13 in the 2013 reclassification round.

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of 21 January 2015, by which the European Commission did not reclassify Mr Adolf Stips as grade AD 13 in the 2013 reclassification round; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of 21 January 2015, by which the European Commission did not reclassify Mr Adolf Stips as grade AD 13 in the 2013 reclassification round;

| 2. | Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by Mr Stips. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by Mr Stips.

---

(1)  OJ C 414, 14/12/2015, p. 45.

---
REGULATORY EVALUATION

Directorate Identifier: 2013-NM-221-AD

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific 

requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of 

transportation?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)
Exhibit 31

Certifications

I, Richard Simpson, certify that:

1.I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Trust 2016-P3 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

2.Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4.Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and

5.All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:  Wells Fargo Bank, National Association; C-III Asset Management LLC; Park Bridge Lender Services LLC; U.S. Bank National Association; CoreLogic Commercial Real Estate Services, Inc.; National Tax Search, LLC; Principal Real Estate Investors, LLC; KeyBank National Association; Pentalpha Surveillance LLC; Trimont Real Estate Advisors, LLC; Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC and Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association.

Date:March 26, 2020

|  | /s/ Richard Simpson ___________________Richard SimpsonPresident, Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc.(senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor) |
|--|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

CGCMT 2016-P3 Certifications
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 99

    CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
          RELATING TO A PERIODIC REPORT CONTAINING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

      I, Robert J. Chaney, Chief Executive Officer, and I, John C. Barney, Chief
Financial Officer, of UGI Utilities, Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation (the
"Company"), hereby certify that:

      (1)   The Company's periodic report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
            March 31, 2003 (the "Form 10-Q") fully complies with the
            requirements of Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
            1934, as amended; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

                                      * * *

<TABLE>
<S>                                          <C>
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER                      CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

/s/ Robert J. Chaney                         /s/ John C. Barney
----------------------------------           ----------------------------------
Robert J. Chaney                             John C. Barney

Date: May 15, 2003                           Date: May 15, 2003
</TABLE>


      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
      been provided to UGI Utilities, Inc. and will be retained by UGI
      Utilities, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
      its staff upon request.
No. 45115.

#### Protest 951502-G of B. Altman & Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Olivee, P. J.

It was stipulated that the atomizers in question are in chief value of glass. The claim at 60 percent under paragraph 218 (f) was therefore sustained. Abstract 44140 followed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 7
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                         1,057,742
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                        1,057,742
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                          1,057,742
<EQUITIES>                                       1,844
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                               1,059,586
<CASH>                                          51,007
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                              67,685
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                          11,158
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,465,709
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                382,928
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                            241,749
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                135,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    224,950
<COMMON>                                        72,569
<OTHER-SE>                                     328,678
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,465,709
<PREMIUMS>                                     385,384
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                             36,594
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                              10,917
<OTHER-INCOME>                                       0
<BENEFITS>                                     285,514
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                     22,513
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                            15,036
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                104,317
<INCOME-TAX>                                    36,276
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             68,041
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    68,041
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.82
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-41372

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JAVIER ADIAS ROJAS-ESPINOZA, also known as Javier Rojas-Espinoza,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:12-CR-654-1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Javier Adias RojasEspinoza has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance

with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632

F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Rojas-Espinoza has not filed a response. We have

reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. 

We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

August 20, 2013

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

 Case: 12-41372 Document: 00512348119 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/20/2013
No. 12-41372

is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

2

 Case: 12-41372 Document: 00512348119 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/20/2013
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Homeland Security Bureau of Customs and Border Protection
 AGENCY: Bureau of Customs and Border Protection, U.S. Department of Homeland Security.
 ACTION: General Notice.
 SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 641 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, (19 U.S.C. 1641) and the Customs Regulations (19 CFR 111.51), the following Customs broker licenses are cancelled without prejudice. Name
License #
Issuing portMartin, Kassatly & Company
13056
San Francisco.Cornerstone Logistics, Inc.
17392
San Francisco.Braverman Enterprise, Inc.
21051
Los Angeles.BLG, Inc.
7360
New York.Carol L. Page
7627
Seattle.
 Dated: April 16, 2007. Daniel Baldwin, Assistant Commissioner, Office of International Trade.


[FR Doc. E7-7961 Filed 4-25-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 9111-14-P
V *' fO* 9-/5

.Uttl The- (Lout^oPCmi'mi iUa.L l^ppea.Ls

<Dt T£3La_s

Pe.Tt'l7o«sa Gov- £»tiOre.+l(DA.ieiv-o[ ReM*'*.^

Pfc-t0t9-A5"

ORIGINAL

RECEIVED IN

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

NOV 20 2015

Abel Acosta, Clerk

nLHD IN

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

ptTf)^G.'H-pp SO." AnftLcCja.KL4-

KOV 20 2S«5

Abel Acosta, Clerk
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 21, 2016

No. 04-15-00433-CV

TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY & POST OAK CLEAN 

GREEN, INC.,

Appellants

v.

GUADALUPE COUNTY GROUNDWATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT,

Appellee

From the 2nd 25th Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas

Trial Court No. 14-0863-CV

Honorable W.C. Kirkendall, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

The panel has considered the appellee’s motion for extension of time to file motion for 

rehearing, and the motion is GRANTED. Time is extended to May 5, 2016.

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 21st day of April, 2016.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
# C_2015294EN.01003902.xml

| 7.9.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 294/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.9.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 294/39

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour constitutionnelle (Luxembourg) lodged on 29 June 2015 — ArcelorMittal Rodange et Schifflange SA v State of the Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg

(Case C-321/15)

(2015/C 294/51)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Referring court

Cour constitutionnelle

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: ArcelorMittal Rodange et Schifflange SA

Applicant:

Defendant: State of the Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Is Article 13(6) of the amended Law of 23 December 2004 establishing a scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading, in so far as it allows the competent minister to order the surrender, without full or partial compensation of allowances issued in accordance with Article 12(2) and (4) of that law, but not used, compatible with Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 2003 establishing a scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community and amending Council Directive 96/61/EC (1), and more particularly with the broad logic of the emissions trading scheme provided for by that directive, that question encompassing the issue of the legal validity of the surrender of allowances which have been issued but not used, and, if that question is answered in the affirmative, of their classification, as well as that of the possible classification of such allowances as property?

1

---

(1)  OJ 2003 L 275, p. 32.

1

---
```

[110th Congress Public Law 146]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ146.110]

[[Page 121 STAT. 1816]]

Public Law 110-146
110th Congress

                                 An Act

 
  To designate the United States courthouse located at 301 North Miami 
     Avenue, Miami, Florida, as the ``C. Clyde Atkins United States 
          Courthouse''. <<NOTE: Dec. 21, 2007 -  [H.R. 2671]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The United States courthouse at 301 North Miami Avenue, Miami, 
Florida, shall be known and designated as the ``C. Clyde Atkins United 
States Courthouse''.
SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the United States courthouse referred to 
in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``C. Clyde Atkins 
United States Courthouse''.

    Approved December 21, 2007.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 2671:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 110-326 (Comm. on Transportation and Infrastructure).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 153 (2007):
            Oct. 29, considered and passed House.
            Dec. 13, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
No. 65717.

#### Ecuadorian Panama Hat Co., Inc., and S. Stern Henry & Co. *v.*United States,

protest 60/26512 (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of straw hats similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Pollak Industrial Corp. et al.*v. *United States*(40 Cust. Ct. 251, C.D. 1991), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
(Reap. Dec. *9777)*

#### Miami Rare Bird Farm, Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. M-347-A, etc.

(Decided August 31, 1960)

Plaintiff not represented by counsel.

*George Oochran Doiib,*Assistant Atttomey General, for the defendant.

Lawrence, Judge:

The records indicate that there was no appearance on behalf of plaintiff when the appeals for a reappraisement enumerated on the schedule attached to and made part of this decision were called for hearing, and the cases were consequently ordered submitted by the court.

Rule 5(a) of the rules of the court provides that—

> The submission for decision of any case shall be made in open court by the parties thereto or their attorneys, or by stipulation, or by written request to the court, or by the court on its own motion. Where the plaintiff, petitioner, or appellant, or his attorney, in a case does not appear when the same is called, and after the opposite party has had opportunity to present evidence on the issues, it may be deemed submitted and may be decided by the court on the record as it appears therein.

Accordingly, I have examined the records in the appeals before the court and find nothing therein which tends in any way to overcome the presumption of correctness which attaches to the decision of the appraiser. I find and hold, therefore, that the proper values of the merchandise are the values returned by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.