alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32.2








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Regency Affiliates, Inc.
(the "Company") for the nine month period ended September 30, 2009 filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Neil N. Hasson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:
 (1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all  material
respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates
presented and the consolidated result of operations of the Company for the
periods presented.
 
 Date  January
6, 2010


By: /s/ Neil N.
Hasson


Neil
N. Hasson


Chief
Financial Officer
p. 1 

# OAR Box 1828 Prepped by Ollie Stewart

Document

Number: 

# 283 ) ll-K - (I ) -9 6 Docket Number: 

# A-83-2 7

Printed 11/12/200811:12:58AM Sheet 283 of 325P. 2 DOE/PE-0029/

2 Oist . Categor

y UC-9 8 

# A-83-2 7 11-K-(I)-9 6 

# BBM T 

# POCIH B T O TH f 

# YEA R 201 0
A Technica l Repor

t i n Suppor

t o f th e Nationa l Energy Polic y Pla n Octobe r 198 3 U.S . Departmen t ofEnergy Offic e ofPolicy , Planning , an d Analysi s Washington , D.C . 2058 5
No. 47546.

#### Protest 961691-G of Sprouse Reitz Co., Inc. (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

At the trial it was stipulated that the banks in question are the same in all material respects as those the subject of Abstract 42749. In accordance therewith they were found to be dutiable as hollow ware at 40 percent under paragraph 339. This claim not having been made, the protest was overruled without affirming the action of the collector.
### Silurian-Devonian pelecypods and Paleozoic stratigraphy of subsurface rocks in Florida and Georgia and related Silurian pelecypods from Bolivia and Turkey

By: John Pojeta Jr.Jiri KrizJean Milton Berdan

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp879

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
February 23, 1943

No. 48068.

Suit 4377.

#### *United States*v. *Leonard W. Moritz Co.*and *Lacta Separator Co., Inc.*

Reap. c. 5483 affirmed. C. A. D. 225.
Docket Number FAA

- 2013

- 0698
Document

CENTERPOINT ENERGY 2005 DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN
 (As Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 2009)


Second Amendment
WHEREAS, CenterPoint Energy, Inc., a Texas corporation (the “Company”), maintains the CenterPoint Energy 2005 Deferred Compensation Plan, as amended and restated effective January 1, 2009 (the “Plan”);
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 7.1 of the Plan, the Board of Directors of the Company may amend or terminate the Plan at any time;
WHEREAS, the Company desires to freeze the Plan such that no Compensation for any Participation Year beginning on or after January 1, 2023 shall be deferred under the Plan, including any Bonus that qualifies as “performance-based compensation” under Code Section 409A(a)(4)(B) with a performance period ending on or after December 31, 2022; and
WHEREAS, no Employee or Director has been designated as eligible to participate in the Plan for any such Participation Year or with respect to any such Bonus or made a deferral election with respect to any such Participation Year or any such Bonus;
NOW, THEREFORE, the Company does hereby amend the Plan as follows, effective as of May 1, 2022:
1.Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings set forth in the Plan.
2.The Plan is frozen as of January 1, 2023 (the “Freeze Date”) such that (a) no Employee or Director shall be a Participant for any Participation Year beginning on or after such date and (b) no Compensation for any such Participation Year shall be deferred under the Plan, including any Bonus that qualifies as “performance-based compensation” under Code Section 409A(a)(4)(B) with a performance period ending on or after December 31, 2022.  Interest shall continue to be 
1








credited with respect to Compensation deferred under the Plan prior to the Freeze Date, in accordance with the terms of the Plan.
3.The following shall be added to the end of Section 3.1 of the Plan:
“Notwithstanding the foregoing, no Employee or Director shall be eligible to participate in the Plan with respect to any Participation Year beginning on or after January 1, 2023, including with respect to any Bonus that qualifies as ‘performance-based compensation’ under Code Section 409A(a)(4)(B) with a performance period ending on or after December 31, 2022.”
4.The following shall be added to the end of Section 3.2 of the Plan:
“Notwithstanding the foregoing, no Employee or Director shall be designated as eligible to participate in the Plan for any Participation Year beginning on or after January 1, 2023, including with respect to any Bonus that qualifies as “performance-based compensation” under Code Section 409A(a)(4)(B) with a performance period ending on or after December 31, 2022.”


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, CenterPoint Energy, Inc. has executed these presents as evidenced by the signature of its officer affixed hereto, this ______ day of April, 2022, but effective as set forth above.
						
		CENTERPOINT ENERGY, INC.
By:    
David J. Lesar
President and Chief Executive Officer



ATTEST:
    
Vincent A. Mercaldi
Assistant Corporate Secretary
2
No. 49378.

Suit 4446.

#### United *States*v. Aris *Gloves, Inc.,*

C. D. 741 modified. C. A. D. 268.
December 10, 1945

No. 6243.

#### A. *Goldmark & Sons Corp.*v. *United States.*

REHEARING MOTION DENIED

Entered at New York, N. Y. Reap. Dec.’s 5992 and 6225. Motion by appellee.
# C_2017151EN.01000701.xml

| 15.5.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 151/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.5.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 151/7

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 15 March 2017 — Stichting Woonpunt, Woningstichting Haag Wonen, Stichting Woonbedrijf SWS.Hhvl v European Commission, Kingdom of Belgium, Vereniging van Institutionele Beleggers in Vastgoed, Nederland (IVBN)

(Case C-415/15 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - State aid - Existing aid - Article 108(1) TFEU - Aid schemes in favour of social housing corporations - Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 - Articles 17, 18 and 19 - Assessment by the Commission of the compatibility with the internal market of an existing aid scheme - Proposal of appropriate measures - Commitments given by the national authorities in order to comply with EU law - Compatibility decision - Scope of judicial review - Legal effects))

(2017/C 151/09)

Language of the case: Dutch

Parties

Parties

Appellants: Stichting Woonpunt, Woningstichting Haag Wonen, Stichting Woonbedrijf SWS.Hhvl (represented by: L. Hancher, E. Besselink and P. Glazener, advocaten)

Appellants:

Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: S. Noë and P.J. Loewenthal, acting as Agents), Kingdom of Belgium, Vereniging van Institutionele Beleggers in Vastgoed, Nederland (IVBN) (represented by: M. Meulenbelt, advocaat)

Other parties to the proceedings:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Sets aside the order of the General Court of the European Union of 12 May 2015, Stichting Woonpunt and Others v Commission (T-203/10 RENV, not published, EU:T:2015:286); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Sets aside the order of the General Court of the European Union of 12 May 2015, Stichting Woonpunt and Others v Commission (T-203/10 RENV, not published, EU:T:2015:286);

| 2. | Refers the case back to the General Court of the European Union; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Refers the case back to the General Court of the European Union;

| 3. | Reserves the costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Reserves the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 337, 12.10.2015.

1

---
Total Coliform Rule Monitoring Requirements 

Community Water Systems Serving 25 - 1,000 People

• You must sample at the sites in your distribution system 

identifi ed in your primacy agency reviewed sampling 

plan.

• You must take 1 sample every month unless your primacy 

agency has allowed you to sample quarterly.

You must take at least 5 routine samples in the month following a total coliform (TC) positive result. For example, 

if your routine sample in June was TC-positive, you must 

take at least 5 routine samples in July.

• You must collect repeat samples within 24 hours of being 

notifi ed of a TC-positive sample. Any TC-positive routine 

or repeat sample must also be analyzed for either fecal 

coliform or E. Coli.

• At a minimum, you must collect 4 repeat samples for 

every TC-positive sample found.

• If you have more than 1 service connection, you must 

collect repeat samples within 24 hours of learning about 

the positive results (unless your primacy agency gives 

you more time).

• If you have only 1 service connection, your primacy 

agency may give you approval to collect repeat samples 

within 4 days of learning of the positive result.

You must collect at least 1 repeat sample from each of the 

sites identifi ed below:

* The tap where the routine TC-positive was taken.

* A tap within 5 service connections upstream of the tap 

where the routine TC-positive was taken.

* Tap within 5 service connections downstream of the tap 

where the routine TC-positive was taken.

• If a repeat sample is positive, you must continue to collect repeat samples, 

per repeat monitoring instructions, until TC is no longer positive or until there 

is an MCL violation (as defi ned below). If a repeat sample is TC -positive, it 

must also be analyzed either for fecal coliform or E. Coli.

• If you have 2 or more TC-positive samples in 1 month (including both repeat 

and routine samples), your system has a monthly MCL violation.

• If you have any fecal coliform or E. Coli-positive repeat samples or have a 

fecal coliform or E. Coli-positive sample followed by a TC -positive repeat 

sample, your system has an acute MCL violation.

Besides sampling, what else are we required to do?

There are also requirements on what 

you report to the primacy agency every 

month, and requirements on how and 

when to notify your customers if you 

have a violation. Contact your primacy 

agency to make sure you are providing 

them with all the information that 

is required.

Where can I fi nd more 

information on the

Total Coliform Rule?

You can fi nd more information on the Total Coliform 

Rule by calling EPA’s Safe Drinking Water Hotline at: 

1.800.426.4791; or you can visit EPA’s Total Coliform 

Rule Web site: 

http://www.epa.gov/safewater/disinfection/

tcr/index.html. 

ROUTINE 

MONITORING

REPEAT MONITORING POSITIVE REPEAT SAMPLES 

AND MCL VIOLATIONS

Primacy Agency___________________________

 (contact name and phone number)

Offi ce of Water (4606M) EPA 816-F-08-005 www.epa.gov/safewater January, 2008
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 84 (Wednesday, May 2, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 24283]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-8332]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[RT01-99-000, RT01-99-001, RT01-99-002 and RT01-99-003; RT01-86-000, 
RT01-86-001 and RT01-86-002; RT01-95-000, RT01-95-001 and RT01-95-002; 
RT01-2-000, RT01-2-001, RT01-2-002 and RT01-2-003; RT01-98-000; RT02-3-
000]


Regional Transmission Organizations; Bangor Hydro-Electric 
Company, et al.; New York Independent System Operator, Inc., et al.; 
PJM Interconnection, L.L.C., et al.; PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.; ISO 
New England, Inc. New York Independent System Operator, Inc.: Notice of 
Filing

April 25, 2007.
    Take notice that PJM Interconnection, L.L.C., New York Independent 
System Operator, Inc. and ISO New England, Inc. have posted on their 
internet websites information updating their progress on the resolution 
of RTO seams.
    Any person desiring to file comments on this information should 
file with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, 
NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214). All such comments should be filed on or before the comment 
date. Comments may be filed electronically via the Internet in lieu of 
paper; see 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the 
Commission's Web site under the ``e-Filing'' link. The Commission 
strongly encourages electronic filings.
    Comment Date: May 16, 2007.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E7-8332 Filed 5-1-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
Exhibit 32

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Chiquita Brands International, Inc. (the company), does hereby certify,
to such officers knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 of the company fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the company.

Dated: May 5, 2009



/s/ Fernando AguirreName: Fernando AguirreTitle: Chief Executive Officer


Dated: May 5, 2009



/s/ Jeffrey M. ZallaName: Jeffrey M. ZallaTitle: Chief Financial Officer
No. 48702.

#### Protests 531968-G, etc., of Samuels Hat Corporation (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

At the trial the president of the plaintiff corporation testified that certain items consist of harvest hats similar to those involved in *Caradine*v. *United States*(9 Cust. Ct. 69, C. D. 664). In accordance therewith the claim at 25 percent under paragraph 1504 (b) (5) was sustained as to those jtems.
# C_2016136EN.01000301.xml

| 18.4.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 136/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.4.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 136/3

---

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 4 February 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Commissione Tributaria Provinciale di Torino — Italy) — Véronique Baudinet and Others v Agenzia delle Entrate — Direzione Provinciale I di Torino

(Case C-194/15) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Articles 63 TFEU and 65 TFEU - Free movement of capital - Article 49 TFEU - Freedom of establishment - Direct taxation - Imposition of dividends - Bilateral agreement on double taxation - Judicial double taxation))

(2016/C 136/04)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Referring court

Commissione Tributaria Provinciale di Torino

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Véronique Baudinet, Adrien Boyer, Pauline Boyer, Edouard Boyer

Applicants:

Defendant: Agenzia delle Entrate — Direzione Provinciale I di Torino

Defendant:

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

Articles 49 TFEU, 63 TFEU and 65 TFEU must be interpreted as not precluding legislation of a Member State, such as the legislation at issue in the main proceedings, under which, when a resident of that Member State, a shareholder in a company established in another Member State, receives from that company dividends taxed in both States, that double taxation is not remedied by the grant in the shareholder’s State of residence of a tax credit at least equal to the amount of tax paid in the State of the source of those dividends.

---

(1)  OJ C 245, 27.7.2015.

1

---
# C_2017070EN.01000502.xml

| 6.3.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 70/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.3.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 70/5

---

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 18 January 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší soud České republiky — Czech Republic) — NEW WAVE CZ, a.s. v ALLTOYS, spol. s r. o.

(Case C-427/15) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Intellectual property - Directive 2004/48/EC - Proceedings concerning an infringement of an intellectual property right - Right of information - Request for information in proceedings - Proceedings linked to the action in which an infringement of an intellectual property right has been found))

(2017/C 070/07)

Language of the case: Czech

Referring court

Referring court

Nejvyšší soud České republiky

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: NEW WAVE CZ, a.s.

Applicant:

Defendant: ALLTOYS, spol. s r. o.

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 8(1) of Directive 2004/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the enforcement of intellectual property rights must be interpreted as applying to a situation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, in which, after the definitive termination of proceedings in which it was held that an intellectual property right was infringed, the applicant in separate proceedings seeks information on the origin and distribution networks of the goods or services by which that intellectual property right is infringed.

---

(1)  OJ C 371, 9.11.2015.

1

---
No. 65689.

#### Ansor Corporation and Joseph A. Paredes & Co. *v.*United States,

protests 58/8065 and 58/18244 (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that tie merchandise consists of soup mixes similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Cresca Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(38 Cust. Ct. 211, C.D. 1864); the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
<PAGE>   1

                       UGI UTILITIES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
        COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES - EXHIBIT 12.1
                             (Thousands of dollars)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                 NINE
                                                MONTHS
                                                 ENDED                        YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
                                                JUNE 30,     -------------------------------------------------------------
                                                  2000           1999            1998            1997            1996
                                              -----------    -----------     -----------     -----------      -----------
<S>                                           <C>            <C>             <C>              <C>              <C>
EARNINGS:
Earnings before income taxes                  $    81,346    $    63,139     $    57,007      $   63,275       $    61,717
Interest expense                                   13,598         17,317          17,383          16,696            15,921
Amortization of debt discount and expense             157            215             200             176               173
Interest component of rental expense                  990          1,539           1,624           1,887             1,838
                                              -----------    -----------     -----------      ----------       -----------
                                              $    96,091    $    82,210     $    76,214      $   82,034       $    79,649
                                              ===========    ===========     ===========      ==========       ===========

FIXED CHARGES:
Interest expense                              $    13,598    $    17,317     $    17,383      $   16,696       $    15,921
Amortization of debt discount and expense             157            215             200             176               173
Allowance for funds used during
      construction (capitalized interest)              21             36              39             114               107
Interest component of rental expense                  990          1,539           1,624           1,887             1,838
                                              -----------    -----------     -----------      ----------       -----------
                                              $    14,766    $    19,107     $    19,246      $   18,873       $    18,039
                                              ===========    ===========     ===========      ==========       ===========

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                   6.51           4.30            3.96            4.35              4.42
                                              ===========    ===========     ===========      ==========       ===========
</TABLE>
Before the Third Division,

December 6, 1951

No. 56145.

protest 167796-K (Tampa).

#### Tropical Hobbyland *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of live birds similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Alfred Mazer*v. *United States*(25 Cust. Ct. 67, C. D. 1265), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.