alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-6829

TERRY ALAN MCCLURE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus PAM CALDWELL, Prison House Services; AL CANNON, Sheriff; CHARLESTON COUNTY DETENTION CENTER; PRISON HOUSE SERVICES, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CA-04-21813) Submitted: October 20, 2005 Decided: October 27, 2005 Before NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Terry Alan McClure, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Holmes Hood, Robert Holmes Hood, Jr., Roy Pearce Maybank, HOOD LAW FIRM, Charleston, South Carolina; Stephanie Pendarvis McDonald, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Terry Alan McClure appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See McClure v. Caldwell , No. CA-04-21813 (D.S.C. May 5, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 123 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 123

Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the District of Columbia 
              Special Olympics Law Enforcement Torch Run.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 20, 2007

Ms. Norton (for herself, Mr. Graves, Mr. Hoyer, Mr. Moran of Virginia, 
Mr. Van Hollen, Mr. Cummings, Mr. Wynn, Mr. Wolf, and Mr. Tom Davis of 
  Virginia) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
     referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the District of Columbia 
              Special Olympics Law Enforcement Torch Run.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF USE OF CAPITOL GROUNDS FOR D.C. SPECIAL 
              OLYMPICS LAW ENFORCEMENT TORCH RUN.

    On June 8, 2007, or on such other date as the Speaker of the House 
of Representatives and the Committee on Rules and Administration of the 
Senate may jointly designate, the 2007 District of Columbia Special 
Olympics Law Enforcement Torch Run (in this resolution referred to as 
the ``event'') may be run through the Capitol Grounds as part of the 
journey of the Special Olympics torch to the District of Columbia 
Special Olympics summer games.

SEC. 2. RESPONSIBILITY OF CAPITOL POLICE BOARD.

    The Capitol Police Board shall take such actions as may be 
necessary to carry out the event.

SEC. 3. CONDITIONS RELATING TO PHYSICAL PREPARATIONS.

    The Architect of the Capitol may prescribe conditions for physical 
preparations for the event.

SEC. 4. ENFORCEMENT OF RESTRICTIONS.

    The Capitol Police Board shall provide for enforcement of the 
restrictions contained in section 5104(c) of title 40, United States 
Code, concerning sales, advertisements, displays, and solicitations on 
the Capitol Grounds, as well as other restrictions applicable to the 
Capitol Grounds, in connection with the event.
                                 <all>
```
III 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 601 

Recognizing the efforts and contributions of outstanding Hispanic scientists 

in the United States. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 30 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 29), 2006 

Mr. MARTINEZ (for himself, Mr. SALAZAR, Mr. MENENDEZ, and Mr. NELSON

of Florida) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the efforts and contributions of outstanding 

Hispanic scientists in the United States. 

Whereas the purpose of the National Hispanic Scientist of 

the Year Award is to recognize outstanding Hispanic scientists in the United States who promote a greater public 

understanding of science and motivate Hispanic youth to 

develop an interest in science; 

Whereas the sixth annual National Hispanic Scientist of the 

Year Gala will be held at the Museum of Science & Industry in Tampa, Florida, on Saturday, October 28, 

2006; 

Whereas proceeds of the National Hispanic Scientist of the 

Year Gala support scholarships for Hispanic boys and 

girls to participate in the Museum of Science & IndusVerDate Aug 31 2005 23:55 Oct 01, 2006 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6300 E:\BILLS\SR601.IS SR601

ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 601 IS 

try’s Youth Enriched by Science Program, known as the 

‘‘YES! Team’’; and 

Whereas a need to acknowledge the work and effort of outstanding Hispanic scientists in the United States has led 

to the selection of Dr. Ine ́s Cifuentes as the honoree of 

the sixth annual National Hispanic Scientist of the Year 

Award, in recognition of her dedication to training 

science and mathematics educators, and her involvement 

in encouraging young students to study the earth 

sciences: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) recognizes efforts to educate, support, and 

3 provide hope for the Hispanic community, including 

4 efforts to honor outstanding Hispanic scientists in 

5 the United States at the annual National Hispanic 

6 Scientist of the Year Gala and to organize a ‘‘Meet 

7 the Hispanic Scientist Day’’; and 

8 (2) congratulates Dr. Ine ́s Cifuentes for being 

9 honored as the National Hispanic Scientist of the 

10 Year for 2006 by the Museum of Science & Indus11 try, in recognition of the dedication Dr. Cifuentes 

12 has shown to training science and mathematics edu13 cators and her involvement in encouraging young 

14 students to study the earth sciences. 

Æ 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
No. 54864.

#### Fleming-Joffe, Ltd., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 144782-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of reptile skins the same in all material respects as those passed upon in *Fleming-Joffe, Ltd.*v. *United States*(25 Cust. Ct. 56, C. D. 1263), the claim for free entry under paragraph 1765 was sustained.
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------


                         CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906
                                     OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Unico American
Corporation (the "Company") for the period ended September 30, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission as of the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Erwin Cheldin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
    the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



                    /s/  Erwin Cheldin
                    ------------------
           Name:    Erwin Cheldin
           Title:   Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer
           Date:    November 7, 2003




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Unico American Corporation, and
will be retained by Unico American Corporation, and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
1 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont 

____________________ 

NO. 09-18-00034-CV 

____________________ 

GEORGE DANNER, Appellant 

V. 

KATHRYN DANNER, Appellee 

________________________________________________________________________ 

On Appeal from the 418th District Court 

Montgomery County, Texas 

Trial Cause No. 17-03-04143-CV

________________________________________________________________________ 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

George Danner filed a notice of appeal from the trial court’s January 4, 2018 

Order Finding Alleged Partition and Exchange Agreement Unenforceable. On 

January 30, 2018, the appellee, Kathryn Danner, filed a motion to dismiss the appeal 

on the ground that the order was interlocutory and not subject to accelerated appeal. 

Appellant did not file a response to the motion to dismiss. 

Generally, temporary orders in a divorce case may not be immediately 

appealed. See Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 6.507 (West 2006). Because the order does 
2 

not dispose of all issues before the trial court and it has not been severed, it is an 

interlocutory order not subject to immediate appeal. See Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 

39 S.W.3d 191, 200 (Tex. 2001). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of 

jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a). 

 Appellee requests that we award her “just damages” in an unspecified amount 

because the appeal is frivolous. See Tex. R. App. P. 45. “Rule 45 does not mandate 

that this court award just damages in every case in which an appeal is frivolous; 

rather the decision to award such damages is a matter within this court’s discretion, 

which we exercise with prudence and caution after careful deliberation.” Glassman 

v. Goodfriend, 347 S.W.3d 772, 782 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2011, pet. 

denied). We deny Appellee’s request for Rule 45 damages. 

APPEAL DISMISSED. 

 

 

 ________________________________ 

 CHARLES KREGER 

 Justice 

 

Submitted on March 7, 2018 

Opinion Delivered March 8, 2018 

Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.
#### Ellsworth, *in*equity, *versus*Starbird.

The obtaining of a conveyance of land upon a verbal promise, that the purchaser would subsequently secure the purchase money by a mortgage, and a refusal afterwards to give such mortgage, do not constitute a sufficient ground for enjoining the purchaser from selling the land, unless some *fraudulent*or *deceptive*practice was used to obtain the conveyance.

The bill prays that the defendant may be enjoined from selling a described lot of land, and for relief.

It alleges in substance that the plaintiff is a poor man ; that he had owned the land; that he conveyed it to defendant upon an agreement that defendant should secure the value to the plaintiff by a mortgage ; that afterwards defendant fraudulently refused to re-convey the land, or pay for it, or give the mortgage, or any other security.

*J. E.*Godfrey, for plaintiff.

Shepley, C. J.,

orally.—The allegations amount only to this, that the plaintiff voluntarily conveyed the land, trusting to the defendant’s mere verbal promise to give security for it. It is not stated that the security was to be given at the same time with the plaintiff’s conveyance, or that any deception was practiced to obtain the conveyance.

*Injunction refused.*
EXHIBIT 32.2








CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906


OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Unico American Corporation (the "Company") for the period ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Lester A. Aaron, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





1.
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.










/s/  Lester A. Aaron


Name:          Lester A. Aaron


Title:           Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer


Date:           August 13, 2010











A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Unico American Corporation, and will be retained by Unico American Corporation, and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

November 29, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

134762 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 134762 

 COA: 277122 

Wayne CC: 03-008761-01 

WENDELL GREEN, JR.,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 19, 2007 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). 

s1119 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

November 29, 2007 

 Clerk
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

CHRISTOPHER DINAN A/K/A CHRISTOPHER WILSON,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 288 EAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 12th day of October, 2018

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
No. 49794.

#### Protests 4095-K, etc., of Aris Gloves, Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Walker, J.

It was stipulated that certain of the gloves are the same in all material respects as those the subject of *United States*v. *Aris Gloves, Inc.*(31 C. C. P. A. 169, C. A. D. 268). In accordance therewith the claim for duty at $5 per dozen pairs plus $1 per dozen pairs under paragraph 1532 (a) and the Czechoslovakian Trade Agreement (T. D. 49458), was sustained as to certain of the items, and the claim made by amendment of protests for duty at $5.50 per dozen pairs under paragraph 1532 (a) was sustained as to certain of the other items.
A90A0343.

#### AT&T TECHNOLOGIES v. BARRETT.

(395 SE2d 22)

Carley, Chief Judge.

In this workers’ compensation case, the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) made an award and appellee-employee sought de novo review before the Full Board. The Full Board adopted the ALJ’s *676award and, on May 2, 1989, appellee filed an appeal to the superior court. Within the sixty-day period after appellee’s appeal was filed, a hearing in the superior court was neither actually held, nor scheduled, and then continued. After the sixty-day period had elapsed, appellant-employer moved for an affirmance of the award. The superior court denied appellant’s motion for affirmance and, after addressing appellee’s appeal on the merits, reversed the award. Appellant’s application to this court for a discretionary appeal from the superior court’s order was granted.

Decided May 16, 1990.

*Swift, Currie, McGhee & Hiers, Mark J. Goodman, Nanne A. Van’t Reit,*for appellant.

Since the award was rendered after July 1, 1988, and before July 1, 1989, the provisions of former OCGA § 34-9-105 (b) are applicable. That former statutory provision provided, in relevant part, as follows: “In the event of an appeal, the board shall, within 30 days of the filing, transmit certified copies of all documents and papers in its file together with a transcript of the testimony taken and its findings of fact and decision to the clerk of the superior court to which the case is appealable. . . . The case so appealed may then be brought by either party upon ten days’ written notice to the other before the superior court for a hearing upon such record, subject to an assignment of the case for hearing by the court; provided, however, *if the court does not hear the case within 60 days from the date the appeal is filed, the decision by the board shall be considered affirmed by the court unless a hearing originally scheduled to be heard within the 60 days has been continued to a date certain by order of the court.”*(Emphasis supplied.) Under the terms of this former statute, the burden was on appellee to insure that a timely hearing of his appeal to the superior court was either held or was scheduled, and then continued. See generally *Southeastern Aluminum Recycling v. Rayburn,*251 Ga. 365 (306 SE2d 240) (1983). That burden was not met. The superior court had no discretion to address the merits of appellee’s appeal after the sixty-day period had run without a hearing either having been held or having been scheduled and then continued. “[I]f the hearing is not held and a decision rendered within the time provided in subsection (b) of this Code section, the court *shall affirm*the decision of the board so appealed from.” (Emphasis supplied.) Former OCGA § 34-9-105 (d). It follows that the superior court erred in reversing rather than affirming the award of the Full Board.

*Judgment reversed.*

*Sognier and Pope, JJ., concur. McMurray, P. J., disqualified.*

*677*Marcus, Moskowitz & Associates, David H. Moskowitz,*for appellee.
----

|   | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,  and |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  May      6, 2009 | /s/ MICHAEL E.      BATTEN               |
|-----------------------------------|------------------------------------------|
|                              | Michael      E. Batten                   |
|                              | Chairman      and Chief ExecutiveOfficer |
# C_2015406EN.01001301.xml

| 7.12.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 406/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.12.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 406/13

---

Appeal brought on 19 January 2015 by Mr Eugen Popp and Mr Stefan M. Zech against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 6 November 2014 in Case T-463/12 Eugen Popp and Stefan M. Zech v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

(Case C-17/15 P)

(2015/C 406/13)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Appellants: Eugen Popp and Stefan M. Zech (represented by: A. Kockläuner and O. Nilgen, Rechtsanwälte)

Other party to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

The Court of Justice of the European Union (Sixth Chamber) dismissed the appeal in a judgment of 26 October 2015 and ordered the appellants to bear their own costs.

---
Exhibit      32.1

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| 1.   | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | Information                contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,                the                financial condition and results of operations of                the Company. |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                   |                                                                            |
|----------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date:                December 17, 2007 | By:                                                                   | /s/ Rainer                Bosselmann                                  |
|                                   | Rainer                Bosselmann                                                |
|                                   | Chairman                of the Board and Chief                Executive Officer |

----
IIB 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 230 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 30, 2007 

Received and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and 

Pensions 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Supporting the observance of Breast Cancer Awareness 

Month, and for other purposes. 

Whereas every 3 minutes a woman is diagnosed with breast 

cancer; 

Whereas another 180,510 new cases of breast cancer are expected to be diagnosed in the United States in 2007; 

Whereas breast cancer is the leading cause of death among 

women between the ages of 45 and 54; 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

HCON 230 RFS 

Whereas 1 out of every 8 women who live to the age of 85 

will develop breast cancer in her lifetime; 

Whereas the survival rate of women who have breast cancer 

is 98.1 percent when detected in the early stages; 

Whereas mammograms and monthly breast self-examinations 

are the key components of early detection; and 

Whereas observing a Breast Cancer Awareness Month would 

provide a special opportunity to offer education on the 

importance of monthly breast self-examinations and annual mammograms: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That Congress— 

3 (1) supports the observance of Breast Cancer 

4 Awareness Month in order to provide a special op5 portunity to offer education on the importance of 

6 monthly breast self-examinations and annual mam7 mograms; 

8 (2) salutes the more than 2.4 million breast 

9 cancer survivors in the United States and the efforts 

10 of victims, volunteers, and professionals who combat 

11 breast cancer each day; 

12 (3) recognizes and applauds the national and 

13 community organizations for their work in pro14 moting awareness about breast cancer, providing in15 formation, and offering treatment to its sufferers; 

16 and 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
3 

HCON 230 RFS 

1 (4) urges organizations and health practitioners 

2 to use this opportunity to promote awareness about 

3 breast cancer, to support monthly self-examinations, 

4 and to encourage annual mammograms. 

Passed the House of Representatives October 29, 

2007. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
No. 54264.

#### Charles W. Baum Corp. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 146809-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.