alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 124 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 8, 2007 

Received 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the National 

Peace Officers’ Memorial Service. 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), 

3 SECTION 1. USE OF CAPITOL GROUNDS FOR NATIONAL 

4 PEACE OFFICERS’ MEMORIAL SERVICE. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Grand Lodge of the Fra6 ternal Order of Police and its auxiliary (in this resolution 

7 referred to as the ‘‘sponsor’’) shall be permitted to 


hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS
2 

HCON 124 RDS 

1 sponsor a public event, the 26th annual National Peace 

2 Officers’ Memorial Service (in this resolution referred to 

3 as the ‘‘event’’), on the Capitol Grounds, in order to honor 

4 the law enforcement officers who died in the line of duty 

5 during 2006. 

6 (b) DATE OF EVENT.—The event shall be held on 

7 May 15, 2007, or on such other date as the Speaker of 

8 the House of Representatives and the Committee on Rules 

9 and Administration of the Senate jointly designate. 

10 SEC. 2. TERMS AND CONDITIONS. 

11 (a) IN GENERAL.—Under conditions to be prescribed 

12 by the Architect of the Capitol and the Capitol Police 

13 Board, the event shall be— 

14 (1) free of admission charge and open to the 

15 public; and 

16 (2) arranged not to interfere with the needs of 

17 Congress. 

18 (b) EXPENSES AND LIABILITIES.—The sponsor shall 

19 assume full responsibility for all expenses and liabilities 

20 incident to all activities associated with the event. 

21 SEC. 3. EVENT PREPARATIONS. 

22 Subject to the approval of the Architect of the Cap23 itol, the sponsor is authorized to erect upon the Capitol 

24 Grounds such stage, sound amplification devices, and 


hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS
3 

HCON 124 RDS 

1 other related structures and equipment, as may be re2 quired for the event. 

3 SEC. 4. ENFORCEMENT OF RESTRICTIONS. 

4 The Capitol Police Board shall provide for enforce5 ment of the restrictions contained in section 5104(c) of 

6 title 40, United States Code, concerning sales, advertise7 ments, displays, and solicitations on the Capitol Grounds, 

8 as well as other restrictions applicable to the Capitol 

9 Grounds, in connection with the event. 

Passed the House of Representatives May 7, 2007. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 


hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS
February 6, 2013

Exemption No. 10695

Regulatory Docket No. FAA

- 20 12

- 1 338

Mr. Charles H. Hilton

500 Llindbergh Drive

Hartford, CT 06043

Dear M r. Hilton :

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It

transmits our decision, explains its basis, and gives you the conditions and

limitations of the exemption, including the date it ends.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated December 18 , 2012 , you petitioned the Federal Aviation

Administration (FAA) for an exemption from § 65

. 75 (a) of Title 14, Code of

Federal Regulations (14 CFR)

. This exemption, if granted, would permit Ct. Aero

Tech to allow students to take the Aviation Mechanics General written test at an

affiliated test center immediately following successful completion of Ct. Aero

Tech’s general curriculum requirements prior to meeting experience requirements

of 14 CFR § 65.77.

The FAA has determi ned that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of

the petition in the Federal Register . T he requested exemption would not set a

precedent, and any delay in acting on this p etition would be detrimental to

Ct. Aero Tech.

The FAA has issued grants of exemption in circumstances similar in all material

respects to those presented in your petiti on. In Grant of Exemption Nos

. 7560

and 6569 (cop ies enclosed), the FAA found that testing immediately after learning

was a universally accepted instructional principle that reinforces learning.

Therefore, we allowed the petitioner to test students immediately after

successfully completing the general c urriculum but before meeting the

requirements of § 65.77.2

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that

—

• they do no t differ materially from those presented by the petitioners in the

enclosed grants of exemption;

• the reasons state d by the FAA for gr anting the enclosed exemptions also apply

to the situation you present; and

• a grant of exemption is in the public interest.

Our Decision

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA

Administrator has delegated to me, I hereby grant Ct. Aero Tech an exemption

from 14 CFR § 65

. 75 (a) to the extent necessary to :

Administer the AMG written test to students immediately

following successful completion of the general curriculum, before

meeting the experience requirements of § 65.77.

Conditions and Limitations

Before exercising the privileges of this exemption, Ct. Aero Tech

must provide its o perations h andboo k to its c ertificate h olding

d istrict o ffice (CHDO) and receive approval of the o perations

h andbook from the CHDO.

T his exemption terminates on December 30 , 201 5 , unless sooner superseded or

rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/

John M. Allen

Director, Flight Standards Service

Enclosures
# C_2019082EN.01003301.xml

| 4.3.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 82/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.3.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 82/33

---

Judgment of the General Court of 13 December 2018 — Ryanair and Airport Marketing Services v Commission

(Case T-111/15) (1)

((State aid - Agreements between the Syndicat mixte des aéroports de Charente and Ryanair and its subsidiary Airport Marketing Services - Airport services - Marketing services - Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery - Notion of State aid - Imputability to the State - Chamber of Commerce and Industry - Advantage - Private investor test - Recovery - Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights - Right of access to the file - Right to be heard))

(2019/C 82/36)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: Ryanair DAC, formerly Ryanair Ltd (Dublin, Ireland), Airport Marketing Services Ltd (Dublin) (represented by: G. Berrisch, E. Vahida, I.-G. Metaxas-Maranghidis, lawyers, and B. Byrne, Solicitor)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Flynn and S. Noë, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking the partial annulment of Commission Decision (EU) 2015/1226 of 23 July 2014 on State aid SA.33963 (2012/C) (ex 2012/NN) implemented by France in favour of Angoulême Chamber of Commerce and Industry, SNC-Lavalin, Ryanair and Airport Marketing Services (OJ 2015 L 201, p. 48).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Ryanair DAC and Airport Marketing Services Ltd to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Ryanair DAC and Airport Marketing Services Ltd to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 178, 1.6.2015.

---
# C_2009015EN.01S00301.xml

| 21.1.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 15/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.1.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 15/s3

---

NOTE TO THE READERThe institutions have decided to no longer quote in their texts the last amendment to cited acts.Unless otherwise indicated, references to acts in the texts published here are to the version of those acts currently in force.

NOTE TO THE READER

---
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 83 (Tuesday, May 1, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 23846]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-8273]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

[AAG/A Order No. 012-2007]


Privacy Act of 1974; Removal of a System of Records Notice

    Pursuant to the provisions of the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 
552a), the Department of Justice (DOJ) is removing the published notice 
of a Privacy Act system of records entitled ``Master Index File of 
Names, DAG-005,'' last published in the Federal Register on October 21, 
1985, at 50 FR 42606.
    The ``Master Index File of Names'' was a system for tracking 
individuals covered by the following systems of records: Appointed 
Assistant U.S. Attorneys Personnel System; Assistant U.S. Attorney 
Applicant Records; Presidential Appointee Candidate Records System; 
Presidential Appointee Records System; Special Candidates for 
Presidential Appointments Records System; and U.S. Judges Records 
System. The ``Master Index File of Names'' consisted of paper file 
cards containing individually identifiable information such as: date of 
birth; date of entry on duty in Federal Service; date of termination of 
Federal Service; and disposition of the records folder.
    The file cards designated as ``Master Index File of Names, DAG-
005'' were destroyed in accordance with National Archives and Records 
Administration (NARA) guidelines. The underlying records from which the 
information on these cards was extracted are all covered by other 
systems of records notices.
    Therefore, the notice of ``DAG-005, Master Index File of Names'' is 
removed from the Department's listing of Privacy Act systems of records 
notices, effective on the date of publication of this notice in the 
Federal Register.

    Dated: April 19, 2007.
Lee J. Lofthus,
Assistant Attorney General for Administration.
[FR Doc. E7-8273 Filed 4-30-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-CG-P
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Corporate Trust Services**

  MAC R1204-010  9062 Old Annapolis Road  Columbia, MD 21045  Tel: 410 884 2000  Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

Re: Annual Statement ofCompliance for JPMCC Commercial Mortgage Securities Trust 2015-JP1, CommercialMortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2015-JP1

 

Per the Pooling and ServicingAgreement dated as of December 1, 2015 (the "Agreement"), theundersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., asCertificate Administrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies asfollows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2016 (the "ReportingPeriod"):

 

(a) A review of Wells Fargo'sactivities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under theAgreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and

 

(b) To the best of suchofficer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of itsobligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

 

February 27, 2017

 

 

/s/ Brian Smith

BRIAN SMITH

Vice President

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll  go far |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------|
# C_2016136EN.01000502.xml

| 18.4.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 136/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.4.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 136/5

---

Order of the Court (Second Chamber) of 20 January 2016 — Skype Ultd v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM), Sky plc, formerly British Sky Broadcasting Group plc, Sky IP International Ltd

(Case C-384/15 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - Community trade mark - No need to adjudicate))

(2016/C 136/08)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Skype Ultd (represented by: A. Carboni and M. Browne, Solicitors)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (represented by: P. Bullock, acting as Agent), Sky plc, formerly British Sky Broadcasting Group plc, Sky IP International Ltd (represented by: D. Rose and J. Curry, Solicitors)

Other parties to the proceedings:

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no need to rule on the appeal. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no need to rule on the appeal.

| 2. | Skype Ultd shall pay the costs of the present proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Skype Ultd shall pay the costs of the present proceedings.

---

(1)  OJ C 354, 26.10.2015.

1

---
----

Appeal brought on 9 May 2005 by Carlos Correia de Matos against the order of the Court of First Instance (First Chamber) of 23 February 2005 in Case T-454/04 Carlos Correia de Matos v Commission

(Case C-200/05 P)

(2006/C 143/37)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Parties

Appellant: Carlos Correia de Matos (represented by: Carlos Correia de Matos)

Other party to the proceedings: Commission of the European Communities

By order of 16 March 2006 the Court of Justice held that the appeal was inadmissible.

----
# C_2016191EN.01002901.xml

| 30.5.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 191/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.5.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 191/29

---

Judgment of the General Court of 12 April 2016 — Choice v EUIPO (Choice chocolate & ice cream)

(Case T-361/15) (1)

1

((European Union trade mark - Application for the European Union figurative mark Choice chocolate & ice cream - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptive Character - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2016/C 191/37)

Language of the case: Polish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Choice sp. z o.o. (Legnica, Poland) (represented by: T. Mielke, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Walicka, Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 30 April 2015 (Case R 2221/2014-5), concerning an application for registration of the figurative sign Choice chocolate & ice cream as a European Union trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Choice sp. z o.o. to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Choice sp. z o.o. to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 294, 07.09.2015.

1

---
Certifications

I, Richard Simpson, certify that:


1.	I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Trust 2016-P3 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);


2.	Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;


3.	Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;


4.	Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and


5.	All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.


In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:  Wells Fargo Bank, National Association; Greystone Servicing Company LLC; Park Bridge Lender Services LLC; U.S. Bank National Association; CoreLogic Solutions, LLC; Principal Real Estate Investors, LLC; KeyBank National Association; Computershare Trust Company, National Association; Pentalpha Surveillance LLC; Trimont Real Estate Advisors, LLC; Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC; Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association;and Wilmington Trust, National Association.

Date:	March 29, 2024

/s/ Richard Simpson_________________Richard SimpsonPresident, Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc.(senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)

CGCMT 2016-P3 Certifications


---
No. 50248.

#### Protest 42123-K of Illfelder Importing Co., Inc (Seattle).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

It was stipulated by counsel that the article involved is manufactured wholly or in chief value of celluloid. The testimony was to the effect that the celluloid articles were used almost entirely in the manufacture of badges for use at football games and that they were worn exclusively by adults. It was held that plaintiff had made out a *prima facie*case and that the evidence offered by defendant was insufficient to support the collector’s classification that the articles were chiefly used for the amusement of children. Upon the record as made the items of merchandise in question were held dutiable at 60 percent under paragraph 31 (b) (2), as claimed.
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

JUNE 7, 2006

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 05-15666

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 04-00157-CR-ORL-22-DAB

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

versus 

SAHI SARWAR, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

_________________________

 (June 7, 2006)

Before TJOFLAT, WILSON and HILL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Rosemary Cakmis, appointed counsel for Sahi Sarwar in this direct criminal
2

appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and

filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396,

18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that

counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because

independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,

counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Sarwar’s conviction and

sentence are AFFIRMED.
No. 56625.

protests 148359-K, etc. (Ogdensburg).

#### F. W. Myers & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items of the merchandise consist of turn or turned boots and shoes similar in-ali material respects to those the subject of *Railway Express Agency, Inc.*v. *United States*(27 Cust. Ct. 91, C. D. 1353), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondent

v. MICHAEL ROY LIPINSKI, Petitioner : : : : : : : : : : : No. 212 WAL 2014 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 1st day of October, 2014, the Petition for Allo wance of Appeal is DENIED
.
Johnson, Dastina - Boise, ID

From: Johnson, Dastina - Boise, ID

Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2007 12:20 PM

Subject: 'eNewsbytes' - A New Civil Rights Library and Book Review Site

Page 1 of 2

10/16/2007

 

A New Civil Rights Library and Book Review Site

You have heard about it; however, do you really know its purpose? 

 

Sure, you have heard about Idaho’s newest additions to the Civil Rights 

webpage—a resource library and a book review site. Yet, have you taken the 

time to peruse it? If you answered no, you are probably not alone, but you are 

definitely missing out on information that can benefit you—both professionally 

and personally. 

The Civil Rights Resource Library is a collection of various media for loan to 

Idaho NRCS employees. Employees may discover a number of uses for these 

materials, including improving awareness of different cultures and races; developing outreach 

techniques, training, self-improvement, reference information and information for Civil Rights 

presentations at staff meetings.

The Civil Rights Book Review provides employees with an opportunity to review and suggest 

books that might be of interest to fellow employees in the area of history and civil rights. It is 

intended to be an enjoyable and casual opportunity for employees to discover and read interesting 

books on Idaho and national history. In these readings, employees will gain insight into the 

treatment and perspectives of minority groups in our past, and compare those cultural perspectives

to current situations. 

The books entered into the Civil Rights Book Review section are available at most libraries or 

bookstores throughout the state. 

The Idaho NRCS Civil Rights Committee encourages all employees to visit the above items on the 

Civil Rights webpage at http://www.id.nrcs.usda.gov/about/informational_resources.html. Click on 

the link for complete details and instructions. 

Questions regarding the Civil Rights Library or Book Review should be directed to Kim Golden, Civil 

Rights Committee Chair, at 208-762-4939. 

'eNewsbytes' are archived online for viewing anytime. Visit 

http://www.id.nrcs.usda.gov/news/ebytes.html for more information. 

 
 

 

Page 2 of 2

10/16/2007