21068 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 81 / Friday April 27, 2007 / Notices 

International Airport, 10510 West 

Zemke Road, P.O. Box 66142, Chicago, 

Illinois 60666. Air carriers and foreign 

air carriers may submit copies of written 

comments previously provided to the 

City of Chicago Department of Aviation 

under section 158.23 of part 158. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. 

James G. Keefer, Manager, Chicago 

Airports District Office, Federal 

Aviation Administration, 2300 E. Devon 

Avenue, Room 320, Des Plaines, Illinois 

60018, (847) 294–7336. The application 

may be reviewed in person at this same 

location. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA 

proposes to rule and invites public 

comment on the application to impose 

and use the revenue from a PFC at 

Chicago O’Hare International Airport 

under the provisions of the 49 U.S.C. 

40117 and Part 158 of the Federal 

Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 158). 

On April 18, 2007, the FAA 

determined that the application to 

impose and use the revenue from a PFC 

submitted by City of Chicago 

Department of Aviation was 

substantially complete within the 

requirements of section 158.25 of Part 

158. The FAA will approve or 

disapprove the application, in whole or 

in part, no later than August 16, 2007. 

The following is a brief overview of 

the application. 

PFC application number: 07–20–C–

00–ORD. 

Level of the proposed PFC: $3.00. 

Proposed charge effective date: 

October 1, 2017. 

Proposed charge expiration date: 

February 1, 2019. 

Total estimated PFC revenue: 

$207,000,000. 

Brief description of proposed projects 

at the $3.00 level: Airport Access Road 

Improvements and Airport Transit 

System (ATS) Vehicle Acquisition and 

System Improvements. 

Class or classes of air carriers which 

the public agency has requested not be 

required to collect PFCs: Air taxi. 

Any person may inspect the 

application in person at the FAA office 

listed above under FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT. 

In addition, any person may, upon 

request, inspect the application, notice 

and other documents germane to the 

application in person at the City of 

Chicago Department of Aviation. 

Issued in Des Plaines, Illinois, on April 23, 

2007. 

Elliott Black, 

Manager, Planning/Programming Branch, 

Airports Division, Great Lakes Region. 

[FR Doc. 07–2077 Filed 4–26–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–M 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

National Highway Traffic Safety 

Administration 

[U.S. DOT Docket No. NHTSA–2007–27971] 

Reports, Forms, and Recordkeeping 

Requirements 

AGENCY: National Highway Traffic 

Safety Administration (NHTSA), DOT. 

ACTION: Request for public comment on 

proposed collection of information. 

SUMMARY: Before a Federal agency can 

collect certain information from the 

public, it must receive approval from 

the Office of Management and Budget 

(OMB). Under procedures established 

by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 

1995, before seeking OMB approval, 

Federal agencies must solicit public 

comment on proposed collections of 

information, including extensions and 

reinstatements of previously approved 

collections. 

This document describes one 

collection of information for which 

NHTSA intends to seek OMB approval. 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before June 26, 2007. 

ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments 

to U.S. Department of Transportation 

Dockets, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Plaza 

401, Washington, DC 20590. Docket No. 

NHTSA–2007–27971. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. 

Alan Block, Contracting Officer’s 

Technical Representative, Office of 

Behavioral Safety Research (NTI–131), 

National Highway Traffic Safety 

Administration, 400 Seventh Street, 

SW., Room 5119, Washington, DC 

20590. Mr. Block’s phone number is 

202–366–6401 and his e-mail address is 

Alan.Block@dot.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 

before an agency submits a proposed 

collection of information to OMB for 

approval, it must publish a document in 

the Federal Register providing a 60-day 

comment period and otherwise consult 

with members of the public and affected 

agencies concerning each proposed 

collection of information. The OMB has 

promulgated regulations describing 

what must be included in such a 

document. Under OMB’s regulations (at 

5 CFR 1320.8(d)), an agency must ask 

for public comment on the following: 

(i) Whether the proposed collection of 

information is necessary for the proper 

performance of the functions of the 

agency, including whether the 

information will have practical utility; 

(ii) The accuracy of the agency’s 

estimate of the burden of the proposed 

collection of information, including the 

validity of the methodology and 

assumptions used; 

(iii) How to enhance the quality, 

utility, and clarity of the information to 

be collected; and 

(iv) How to minimize the burden of 

the collection of information on those 

who are to respond, including the use 

of appropriate automated, electronic, 

mechanical, or other technological 

collection techniques or other forms of 

information technology, e.g., permitting 

electronic submission of responses. 

In compliance with these 

requirements, NHTSA asks public 

comment on the following proposed 

collection of information: 

2008 National Survey of Drinking and 

Driving Attitudes and Behavior 

Type of Request—New information 

collection requirement. 

OMB Clearance Number—None. 

Form Number—This collection of 

information uses no standard forms. 

Requested Expiration Date of 

Approval—December 31, 2009. 

Summary of the Collection of 

Information—NHTSA proposes to 

conduct a year 2008 National Survey of 

Drinking and Driving Attitudes and 

Behavior by telephone among a national 

probability sample of 6,000 adults (age 

16 and older). Participation by 

respondents would be voluntary. Survey 

topics would include frequency of 

drinking and driving and of riding with 

a driver who has been drinking, ways to 

prevent drinking and driving, 

enforcement of drinking and driving 

laws, and understanding of Blood 

Alcohol Concentration (BAC) levels and 

legal limits. 

In conducting the proposed survey, 

the interviewers would use computerassisted telephone interviewing to 

reduce interview length and minimize 

recording errors. A Spanish-language 

translation and bilingual interviewers 

would be used to minimize language 

barriers to participation. The proposed 

survey would be anonymous; the survey 

would not collect any personal 

information that would allow anyone to 

identify respondents. Participant names 

would not be collected during the 

interview and the telephone number 

used to reach the respondent would be 

separated from the data record prior to 

its entry into the analytical database. 

Description of the Need for the 

Information and Proposed Use of the 

Information—The National Highway 

Traffic Safety Administration’s 

(NHTSA) mission is to save lives, 

prevent injuries, and reduce healthcare 

and other economic costs associated 

with motor vehicle crashes. The 


cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 81 / Friday April 27, 2007 / Notices 21069 

1The notice was filed on March 27, 2007, and, 

at the Board’s request, was supplemented on April 

16, 2007, with a letter describing the trackage to be 

acquired. April 16, 2007 will be considered the 

filing date and the basis for all due dates. 

2According to UTA, the remaining width is a 35- 

foot wide strip of land, the portion of the right-ofway on which the rail and supporting operating 

infrastructure are located. UTA previously acquired 

a 35-foot wide strip of the Bingham Industrial Lead 

right-of-way. See Utah Transit Authority—

Acquisition Exemption—Certain Assets of Union 

Pacific Railroad Company, STB Finance Docket No. 

34170 (STB served May 22, 2002). 

3That exemption was scheduled to become 

effective on March 29, 2007, but was stayed at the 

request of Utah Shipper Coalition (Coalition) in a 

decision served on March 28, 2007, pending further 

action by the Board. The Board stated that UTA 

must obtain Board approval or a finding that Board 

approval is not needed for it to acquire the Lead 

before SBGR may proceed with the acquisition in 

STB Finance Docket No. 35002. Additionally, the 

Board stated that UTA’s submission should include 

a copy of the Administration and Coordination 

Agreement it plans to enter into with SBGR and a 

copy of any other related agreements not previously 

submitted that would allow the Board to ascertain 

whether the proposed transaction would allow 

SBGR to fulfill the common carrier obligation it 

seeks to acquire. 

agency’s goal is to reduce the rate of 

fatalities in high (0.08+) Blood Alcohol 

Concentration (BAC) crashes per 100 

million vehicle miles traveled from 0.51 

in 2003 to 0.48 in 2008. In order to plan 

and evaluate programs intended to 

reduce alcohol-impaired driving, 

NHTSA needs to periodically update its 

knowledge and understanding of the 

public’s attitudes and behaviors with 

respect to drinking and driving. NHTSA 

began measuring the driving age 

public’s attitudes and behaviors 

regarding drinking and driving in 1991. 

The proposed study, to be administered 

in the 1st quarter of 2008, and the eighth 

in this series of surveys, will collect 

data on topics included in the first 

seven studies (and some additional 

topics), including: frequency of drinking 

and driving and of riding with a driver 

who has been drinking, ways to prevent 

drinking and driving, enforcement of 

drinking and driving laws, and 

understanding of BAC levels and legal 

limits. 

The findings from this proposed 

collection of information will assist 

NHTSA in addressing the problem of 

alcohol-impaired driving and in 

formulating programs and 

recommendations to Congress. NHTSA 

will use the findings to help focus 

current programs and activities to 

achieve the greatest benefit, to develop 

new programs to decrease the likelihood 

of drinking and driving, and to provide 

informational support to States, 

localities, and law enforcement agencies 

that will aid them in their efforts to 

reduce drinking and driving crashes and 

injuries. 

Description of the Likely Respondents 

(Including Estimated Number, and 

Proposed Frequency of Response to the 

Collection of Information)—Under this 

proposed effort, the Contractor would 

conduct a survey pretest and final 

survey administration. A total of 18 

telephone pretest interviews averaging 

20 minutes in length would be 

administered to test the computer 

programming of the questionnaire, and 

to determine if any last adjustments to 

the questionnaire are needed. Following 

any revisions carried out as a result of 

the pretest, the Contractor would 

conduct telephone interviews averaging 

approximately 20 minutes in length 

with 6,000 randomly selected members 

of the general public age 16 and older 

in telephone households. For nondrinkers and non-drivers the interview 

will average below 20 minutes, while 

for drinker-drivers it will average 

slightly over 20 minutes. The 

respondent sample would be selected 

from all 50 States plus the District of 

Columbia. Interviews would be 

conducted with persons at residential 

phone numbers selected through 

random digit dialing. Businesses are 

ineligible for the sample and would not 

be interviewed. No more than one 

respondent would be selected per 

household. Each member of the sample 

would complete one interview. 

Estimate of the Total Annual 

Reporting and Record Keeping Burden 

Resulting from the Collection of 

Information—NHTSA estimates that the 

pretest interviews would require an 

average of 20 minutes apiece or a total 

of 6 hours for the 18 respondents. Each 

respondent in the final survey sample 

would require an average of 20 minutes 

to complete the telephone interview or 

a total of 2,000 hours for the 6,000 

respondents. Thus, the number of 

estimated reporting burden hours a year 

on the general public would be 2,006 for 

the proposed survey (6 for the pretest, 

and 2000 for the final survey 

administration). The respondents would 

not incur any reporting cost from the 

information collection. The respondents 

also would not incur any record keeping 

burden or record keeping cost from the 

information collection. 

Authority: 44 U.S.C. Section 3506(c)(2)(A). 

Marilena Amoni, 

Associate Administrator, Research and 

Program Development. 

[FR Doc. E7–8072 Filed 4–26–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–59–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Surface Transportation Board 

[STB Finance Docket No. 35008] 

Utah Transit Authority—Acquisition 

Exemption—Union Pacific Railroad 

Company 

Utah Transit Authority (UTA), a 

noncarrier, has filed a verified notice of 

exemption under 49 CFR 1150.31 1 to 

acquire from Union Pacific Railroad 

Company (UP) the ‘‘remaining width’’ 2

of a portion of the Bingham Industrial 

Lead (Lead) extending from milepost 

0.0. at Midvale to milepost 6.60 at 

Bagley, in Salt Lake County, UT. UTA 

attached a copy of the agreement with 

UP, captioned ‘‘Eighth Amendment to 

Purchase and Sale Agreement.’’ UTA 

maintains that the acquisition does not 

require Board authorization and, on 

April 20, 2007, filed a motion to dismiss 

the notice of exemption and also filed 

a copy of its Administration and 

Coordination Agreement with Savage 

Bingham & Garfield Railroad Company 

(SBGR), the carrier that is to operate the 

Lead. 

Previously, on February 27, 2007, 

SBGR, a noncarrier, invoked the class 

exemption to acquire from UP and 

operate freight easements upon, over, 

and across a number of rail lines and 

track, including the Lead between 

milepost 0.18 at Midvale and milepost 

6.60 at Bagley Spur. See Savage 

Bingham & Garfield Railroad 

Company—Acquisition and Operation 

Exemption, STB Finance Docket No. 

35002, served and published in the 

Federal Register on March 15, 2007 (72 

FR 12261) (Savage Bingham). 

In the notice of exemption, SBGR 

stated that in a separate transaction UP 

would: (1) Convey the right-of-way of 

the Lead to UTA; (2) reserve an 

operating easement over the Lead; and 

(3) convey the operating easement over 

the Lead to SBGR. SBGR also stated that 

it would enter into an Administration 

and Coordination Agreement with UTA 

to govern the rail freight services SBGR 

would provide over the Lead during 

specified periods when UTA’s planned 

passenger light rail services would 

operate.3

UTA certifies that its projected 

revenues as a result of this transaction 

will not exceed those that would qualify 

it as a Class III rail carrier. 

The earliest this transaction may be 

consummated is May 16, 2007, the 

effective date of the notice of 

exemption, as supplemented (30 days 

after the exemption was filed). 

If the verified notice contains false or 

misleading information, the exemption 

is void ab initio. Petitions to revoke the 

exemption under 49 U.S.C. 10502(d) 

may be filed at any time. The filing of 


cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES