alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2015354EN.01001801.xml

| 26.10.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 354/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 354/18

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State (Belgium) lodged on 17 July 2015 — Hilde Orleans and Others v Vlaams Gewest; other party: Gemeentelijk Havenbedrijf Antwerpen

(Case C-387/15)

(2015/C 354/20)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Referring court

Raad van State

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Hilde Orleans, Rudi Van Buel, Marina Apers

Applicants:

Defendant: Vlaams Gewest

Defendant:

Intervener: Gemeentelijk Havenbedrijf Antwerpen

Intervener:

Question referred

Question referred

The Regional Development Implementation Plan (GRUP) contains planning rules under which, in mandatory terms, the development of areas (more specifically, for seaport- and water-related businesses, for a logistics park, for waterway infrastructure and for traffic and transport infrastructure) which have ecological features (areas hosting a natural habitat type or the habitat of a species for which the special area of conservation concerned was designated) which make a contribution to the conservation objectives of the special areas of conservation concerned, is possible only after the creation of sustainable habitats in ecological core areas (designated within the Natura 2000 area) and following a decision by the Flemish Government preceded by an opinion from the Flemish administrative body responsible for nature conservation — which should form part of an application for a planning permit with a view to the development of the aforementioned facilities — that the sustainable creation of the ecological core areas has been successful.

Can those planning rules with their envisaged positive developments of ecological core areas be taken into account in the determination, under Article 6(3) of the Habitats Directive (1), of potentially significant effects and/or in the making of an appropriate assessment, or can those planning rules be regarded only as ‘compensatory measures’ within the meaning of Article 6(4) of the Habitats Directive, in so far as the conditions laid down in that provision have been satisfied?

1

---

(1)  Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora (OJ 1992 L 206, p. 7).

1

---
Shinners <tedshinners@gmail.com> 

y, August 03, 2012 12:08 AM 

ny, Dennis (OST) 

elander airport 

We love Minneapolis airport. 

(1= 02 .... 

elander. 19 seat turbo prop we are driving to cwa instead. The key is a good departure time out of rhinelander- say 730-830. 

Sacramento via cwa/delta. 

arture and arrival times are bad. SO jet vs 19 prop no brainer. 

e only want one layover on domestic flights. They Were doomed to fail from the start. 

1
No. 46326.

#### Protest 975669-G of W. X. Huber Co. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Dallingeb, J.

It was stipulated that the vulcanizers in question are similar to those the subject of *Mitsui*v. *United States*(T. D. 49609). The claim at 35 percent under paragraph 359 was therefore sustained.
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v FRUTO ALICEA, Seaman Apprentice, U. S. Navy, Appellant

19 USCMA 485, 42 CMR 87

No. 22,870

June 5, 1970

*Lieutenant Donald B. Brant, Jr.,*JAGC, USNR, was on the pleadings for Appellant, Accused.

*Lieutenant Colonel Charles J. Keener,*USMC, was on the pleadings for Appellee, United States.

Opinion of the Court

Darden,Judge:

The appellant stands convicted of escape from lawful confinement and two unauthorized absences. One absence without leave began in June 1967, while the two remaining offenses occurred in March 1968. The dates of these offenses made erroneous the action of the prosecution in introducing for sentencing purposes a record of Article 15 punishments. United States v Johnson, 19 USCMA 464, 42 CMR 66 (1970). The sentence given the appellant by this general court-martial was less than the maximum approved in a pretrial agreement. In addition, the Article 15 misconduct is shown to be short unauthorized absences. Finally, there is also evidence of an earlier special court-martial conviction for an unauthorized absence. Taking the record as a whole, we cannot fairly say that Alicea has been harmed by the error here present. Accordingly, the decision of the Court of Military Review is affirmed.

Chief Judge Quinn concurs.

Ferguson, Judge

(dissenting):

I dissent for the reasons set forth in my separate opinion in United States v Johnson, 19 USCMA 464, 42 CMR 66 (1970).
# C_2016454EN.01001401.xml

| 5.12.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 454/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.12.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 454/14

---

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 21 September 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Contencioso-Administrativo No 1 de Oviedo — Spain) — Carlos Álvarez Santirso v Consejería de Educación, Cultura y Deporte del Principado de Asturias

(Case C-631/15) (1)

((References for a preliminary ruling - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Directive 1999/70/EC - Framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP - Clause 4 - Successive fixed-term employment contracts in the public sector - Non-tertiary education - National rules - Grant of remuneration supplement - Condition - Positive result obtained in evaluation process - Professors employed as interim civil servants - Not included - Principle of non-discrimination))

(2016/C 454/26)

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Juzgado de lo Contencioso-Administrativo No 1 de Oviedo

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Carlos Álvarez Santirso

Defendant: Consejería de Educación, Cultura y Deporte del Principado de Asturias

Operative part of the order

Clause 4(1) of the of the Framework agreement on fixed-term work, concluded on 18 March 1999, which is set out in the Annex to Council Directive 1999/70/EC of 28 June 1999 concerning the framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP must be interpreted as precluding national rules, such as those at issue in the main proceedings, which reserve participation in teaching evaluation plans and, in the case of a positive result, the ensuing financial incentives, exclusively for teachers employed under permanent employment relationships as established career civil servants, thereby excluding persons employed as interim civil servants under fixed-term employment relationships.

---

(1)  OJ C 68, 22.2.2016.

---
11112/2015 

Abel Acosta, Clerk 

FIDEL RAMIREZ
No. 45185.

#### Protests 961846-G of Kato Bros. & Co. (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of Rockingham earthenware similar to that the subject of *Butler*v. *United States*(4 Cust. Ct. 120, C. D. 303). The claim at 25 percent under paragraph 210 was therefore sustained.
110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 165 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Whereas motor vehicle crashes are the leading cause of death 

for adolescents and young adults in the United States, 

and many of these deaths are preventable; 

Whereas almost 7,500 drivers between the ages of 15 and 20 

years were involved in fatal crashes in 2005 throughout 

the United States; 
2 

•HCON 165 EH 

Whereas the fatality rate in the United States for drivers between the ages of 16 and 19 years, based on miles driven, 

is 4 times the fatality rate for drivers between the ages 

of 25 and 69 years; 

Whereas the majority of teen driver crashes in the United 

States are due to driver error and speeding, and 15 percent of the crashes are due to drunk driving; 

Whereas roughly two-thirds of the teenagers killed in motor 

vehicle accidents in the United States each year do not 

use seatbelts; 

Whereas approximately 63 percent of teen passenger deaths 

in the United States occur while other teenagers are driving; 

Whereas it is necessary to explore effective ways to reduce 

the crash risk for young drivers by focusing research and 

outreach efforts on areas of teen driving that show the 

most promise for improving safety; 

Whereas the National Teen Driver Survey, developed with 

input from teenagers and administered by The Children’s 

Hospital of Philadelphia, demonstrates a national need to 

increase overall awareness about the safe use of electronic 

handheld devices, the risk of nighttime and fatigued driving, the importance of consistent seatbelt use, and the 

practice of gradually increasing driver privileges over 

time as a young driver gains more experience under supervised conditions; 

Whereas in 2005, 1,553 crash fatalities involving a teen driver occurred in the fall, when teenagers are in the first 

months of the school year and faced with many decisions 

involving driving, including whether to drive with peer 

passengers and other distractions; and 
3 

•HCON 165 EH 

Whereas designating the third week of October as National 

Teen Driver Safety Week is expected to increase awareness of these important issues among teenagers and 

adults in communities throughout the United States, as 

additional research is conducted to develop and test effective interventions that will help teenagers become safer 

drivers: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That Congress— 

3 (1) supports the goals and ideals of National 

4 Teen Driver Safety Week; and 

5 (2) encourages the people of the United States 

6 to observe the week with appropriate activities that 

7 promote the practice of safe driving among the Na8 tion’s licensed teenage drivers. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 5, 

2007. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 165 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Supporting the goals and ideals of National Teen 

Driver Safety Week.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 85 (Thursday, May 3, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 24578]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-8404]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP99-518-101]


Gas Transmission Northwest Corporation; Notice of Tariff Filing 
and Negotiated Rates

April 26, 2007.
    Take notice that on April 23, 2007, Gas Transmission Northwest 
Corporation (GTN) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, 
Third Revised Volume No. 1-A, the following tariff sheets, to become 
effective April 24, 2007:

Twelfth Revised Sheet No. 24
Sixth Revised Sheet No. 27

    GTN states that these sheets are being filed to update GTN's 
reporting of negotiated rate transactions that it has entered into.
    GTN further states that a copy of this filing has been served on 
GTN's jurisdictional customers and interested state regulatory 
agencies.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing must file in accordance 
with Rule 211 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 
CFR 385.211). Protests to this filing will be considered by the 
Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will 
not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Such protests 
must be filed in accordance with the provisions of Section 154.210 of 
the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 154.210). Anyone filing a protest 
must serve a copy of that document on all the parties to the 
proceeding.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests in lieu 
of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons 
unable to file electronically should submit an original and 14 copies 
of the protest to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First 
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#460003140509282a2f282315333636293432062023342568212930"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="35737067767a5b595c5b50664045455a474175535047561b525a43">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E7-8404 Filed 5-2-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 528 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 528

  Designating the week beginning on September 10, 2006, as ``National 
          Historically Black College and Universities Week''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 13, 2006

 Mr. Graham (for himself, Mr. Brownback, Mr. Kerry, Ms. Mikulski, Mr. 
DeWine, Mr. DeMint, Mr. Talent, Mr. Isakson, Mr. Obama, Mr. Voinovich, 
    Ms. Landrieu, Mr. Santorum, Mr. Dodd, Mr. Lott, Mr. Durbin, Mr. 
Chambliss, Mr. Bayh, Mr. Specter, Mr. Allen, Mr. Burr, Mr. McCain, Mr. 
 Cochran, Mr. Biden, Mrs. Hutchison, Mrs. Dole, Mr. Frist, Mr. Warner, 
 Mr. Alexander, Mr. Vitter, Mrs. Boxer, Mr. Sarbanes, Mr. Salazar, and 
 Mr. Schumer) submitted the following resolution; which was considered 
                             and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Designating the week beginning on September 10, 2006, as ``National 
          Historically Black College and Universities Week''.

Whereas there are 103 historically Black colleges and universities in the United 
        States;
Whereas historically Black colleges and universities provide the quality 
        education essential to full participation in a complex, highly 
        technological society;
Whereas historically Black colleges and universities have a rich heritage and 
        have played a prominent role in the history of the United States;
Whereas historically Black colleges and universities have allowed many 
        underprivileged students to attain their full potential through higher 
        education; and
Whereas the achievements and goals of historically Black colleges and 
        universities are deserving of national recognition: Now, therefore, be 
        it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) designates the week beginning September 10, 2006, as 
        ``National Historically Black Colleges and Universities Week''; 
        and
            (2) calls on the people of the United States and interested 
        groups to observe the week with appropriate ceremonies, 
        activities, and programs to demonstrate support for 
        historically Black colleges and universities in the United 
        States.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                              92
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,772
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        589
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,702
<PP&E>                                           6,223
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,617
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   6,899
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,784
<BONDS>                                          1,423
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            77
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,650
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     6,899
<SALES>                                          3,095
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,095
<CGS>                                            2,575
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,575
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  38
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    204
<INCOME-TAX>                                        75
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                129
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       129
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.03
        

</TABLE>
# C_2016038EN.01002601.xml

| 1.2.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 38/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.2.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 38/26

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Netherlands) lodged on 5 November 2015 — X, Other party: Staatssecretaris van Financiën

(Case C-570/15)

(2016/C 038/38)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Referring court

Hoge Raad der Nederlanden

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: X

Appellant:

Other party: Staatssecretaris van Financiën

Other party:

Question referred

Question referred

What standard or standards should be used to assess what legislation is designated by Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 (1) as applicable in the case of a worker residing in Belgium who performs the bulk of his work for his Dutch employer in the Netherlands, and in addition performs 6,5 per cent of that work in Belgium in the year in question, at home and with clients, without there being a fixed pattern and without any agreement having been made with his employer with regard to the performance of work in Belgium?

1

---

(1)  Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 of the Council of 14 June 1971 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons and their families moving within the Community (OJ 1971 L 149, p. 2).

1

---
(Reap. Dec. 8991)

Entry No. 6348, etc.

#### Castelazo & Associates *v.*United States

(Decided September 11, 1957)

*Lawrence & Tuttle*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Olivee, Chief Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement enumerated in schedule “A,” attached hereto and made a part hereof, relate to electric motors and accessories exported from England and entered at the port of Los Angeles.

The cases have been submitted on an agreed set of facts that show cost of production, as defined in section 402 (f) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for appraisement of the merchandise in question and that establish such statutory values for the electric motors and accessories, identified in schedule “B,” attached hereto and made a part hereof, to be “the amounts given therein in British pounds, plus the percentages where indicated,” and I so hold. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
# C_2016078EN.01000701.xml

| 29.2.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 78/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.2.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 78/7

---

Action brought on 18 December 2015 — European Commission v Republic of Poland

(Case C-683/15)

(2016/C 078/08)

Language of the case: Polish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: K.-P. Wojcik, M. Heller and J. Hottiaux, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Republic of Poland

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2014/59/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 establishing a framework for the recovery and resolution of credit institutions and investment firms and amending Council Directive 82/891/EEC, and Directives 2001/24/EC, 2002/47/EC, 2004/25/EC, 2005/56/EC, 2007/36/EC, 2011/35/EU, 2012/30/EU and 2013/36/EU, and Regulations (EU) No 1093/2010 and (EU) No 648/2012, of the European Parliament and of the Council, (1) and in any event by not notifying the Commission of such provisions, the Republic of Poland has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 130(1) of that directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2014/59/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 establishing a framework for the recovery and resolution of credit institutions and investment firms and amending Council Directive 82/891/EEC, and Directives 2001/24/EC, 2002/47/EC, 2004/25/EC, 2005/56/EC, 2007/36/EC, 2011/35/EU, 2012/30/EU and 2013/36/EU, and Regulations (EU) No 1093/2010 and (EU) No 648/2012, of the European Parliament and of the Council, (1) and in any event by not notifying the Commission of such provisions, the Republic of Poland has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 130(1) of that directive;

1

| — | impose upon the Republic of Poland, in accordance with Article 260(3) TFEU, a penalty payment for failure to fulfil its obligation to notify measures transposing Directive 2014/59/EU at the daily rate of EUR 51 456 from the day on which judgment is delivered in the present case; |
| --- | --- |

—

impose upon the Republic of Poland, in accordance with Article 260(3) TFEU, a penalty payment for failure to fulfil its obligation to notify measures transposing Directive 2014/59/EU at the daily rate of EUR 51 456 from the day on which judgment is delivered in the present case;

| — | order the Republic of Poland to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Republic of Poland to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period for transposing Directive 2014/59/EU expired on 31 December 2014.

---

(1)  OJ 2014 L 173, p. 190.

1

---
**Exhibit 15.3**

April 30, 2015 

Securities and Exchange Commission 

100 F Street, N.E. Washington, D.C. 

20549-7561 

Dear Sirs/Madams: 

We have read Item 16F of China ZenixAuto International Limited’s Form 20-F dated April 30, 2015, and have the following comments: 

1. We agree with the statements made in paragraph1 to 4 of Item 16F for which we have a basis on which to comment on, and we agree with, the disclosures. 

2. We have no basis on which to agree ordisagree with the statements made in the paragraph 5 of Item 16F. 

Yours truly, 

/s/ Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu
Before the First Division,

February 26, 1943

No. 48056.

#### Protest 61826-K of Louis Wolf & Co., Inc. (Seattle).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of *Pressner v. United States*(7 Cust. Ct. 106, C. D. 546) the claim at 60 percent under paragraph 31 was sustained.