alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2019328EN.01003601.xml

| 30.9.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 328/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.9.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 328/36

---

Judgment of the General Court of 2 July 2019 — Mahmoudian v Council

(Case T-406/15) (1)

(Non-contractual liability - Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures against the Islamic Republic of Iran - Freezing of funds - Restrictions on admission to the territories of the Member States - Compensation for the damage allegedly suffered as a result of the inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons and entities subject to the restrictive measures - Material damage - Non-material damage)

(2019/C 328/38)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Fereydoun Mahmoudian (Tehran, Iran) (represented by A. Bahrami and N. Korogiannikis, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by R. Liudvinaviciute-Cordeiro and M. Bishop, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: European Commission (represented initially by A. Aresu and D. Gauci, then by A. Aresu and R. Tricot acting as Agents)

Re:

Action under Article 268 TFEU seeking compensation in respect of the damage allegedly suffered by the applicant as a result of the adoption of Council Decision 2010/413/CFSP of 26 July 2010 concerning restrictive measures against Iran and repealing Common Position 2007/140/CFSP (OJ 2010 L 195, p. 39), Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2010 of 26 July 2010 implementing Article 7(2) of Regulation (EC) No 423/2007 concerning restrictive measures against Iran (OJ 2010 L 195, p. 25), Council Decision 2010/644/CFSP of 25 October 2010 amending Decision 2010/413/CFSP (OJ 2010 L 281, p. 81), and Council Regulation (EU) No 961/2010 of 25 October 2010 on restrictive measures against Iran and repealing Regulation (EC) No 423/2007 (OJ 2010, L 281, p. 1), by which the applicant’s name was included and maintained on the lists of persons and entities subject to the restrictive measures.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Orders the Council of the European Union to pay Mr Fereydoun Mahmoudian EUR 71 000 in compensation for the non-material damage suffered; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Orders the Council of the European Union to pay Mr Fereydoun Mahmoudian EUR 71 000 in compensation for the non-material damage suffered;

| 2. | Dismisses the action as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

| 3. | Orders Mr Fereydoun Mahmoudian, the Council and the Commission each to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Mr Fereydoun Mahmoudian, the Council and the Commission each to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 337, 12.10.2015.

---
# C_2016156EN.01004501.xml

| 2.5.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 156/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.5.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 156/45

---

Order of the General Court of 11 March 2016 — Consorzio Vivaisti viticoli pugliesi and Negro Daniele v Commission

(Case T-436/15) (1)

1

((Action for annulment - Agriculture - Protective measures against pests of plants - Measures to prevent the introduction into and the spread within the Union of Xylella fastidiosa - Regulatory act entailing implementing measures - Lack of individual concern - Request to modify the form of order sought - Inadmissibility))

(2016/C 156/60)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Consorzio Vivaisti viticoli pugliesi (Otranto, Italy) and Negro Daniele (Otranto) (represented by: V. Pellegrino and A. Micolani, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: D. Bianchi and I. Galindo Martín, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action for annulment of Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/789 of 18 May 2015 as regards measures to prevent the introduction into and the spread within the Union of Xylella fastidiosa (Wells et al.) (OJ 15 L 125, p. 3), in so far as the vine (Vitis) is included in Annex I to that decision and Article 9 of the latter prohibits movement within the European Union, within or out of the demarcated areas.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed.

| 2. | Consorzio Vivaisti viticoli pugliesi and Negro Daniele are ordered to pay the costs, including those relating to the interlocutory proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Consorzio Vivaisti viticoli pugliesi and Negro Daniele are ordered to pay the costs, including those relating to the interlocutory proceedings.

---

(1)  OJ C 328, 5.10.2015.

1

---
# C_2016027EN.01001601.xml

| 25.1.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 27/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.1.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 27/16

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Amsterdam (Netherlands) lodged on 11 November 2015 — Openbaar Ministerie v Gerrit van Vemde

(Case C-582/15)

(2016/C 027/20)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Referring court

Rechtbank Amsterdam

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Openbaar Ministerie

Applicant:

Defendant: Gerrit van Vemde

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Must the first sentence of Article 28(2) of Framework Decision 2008/909/JHA (1) be understood as meaning that the declaration referred to therein may relate only to judgments issued before 5 December 2011, irrespective of when those judgments became final, or must that provision be understood as meaning that the declaration may relate only to judgments which became final before 5 December 2011?

1

---

(1)  Council Framework Decision of 27 November 2008 on the application of the principle of mutual recognition to judgments in criminal matters imposing custodial sentences or measures involving deprivation of liberty for the purpose of their enforcement in the European Union (OJ 2008 L 327, p. 27).

1

---
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 79 (Wednesday, April 25, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 20527]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-7863]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP06-569-000]


Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp.; Notice of Informal 
Settlement Conference

April 19, 2007.
    Take notice that an informal settlement conference will be convened 
in this proceeding commencing at 9 a.m. (EST) on Thursday, May 3, 2007, 
at the offices of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First 
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, for the purpose of exploring the 
possible settlement of the above-referenced docket.
    Any party, as defined by 18 CFR 385.102(c), or any participant as 
defined by 18 CFR 385.102(b), is invited to attend. Persons wishing to 
become a party must move to intervene and receive intervenor status 
pursuant to the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 385.214).
    FERC conferences are accessible under section 508 of the 
Rehabilitation Act of 1973. For accessibility accommodations please 
send an e-mail to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#09686a6a6c7a7a606b6065607d70496f6c7b6a276e667f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7c1d1f1f190f0f151e15101508053c1a190e1f521b130a">[email protected]</span></a> or call toll free 1-866-208-
3372 (voice) or 202-208-1659 (TTY), or send a FAX to 202-208-2106 with 
the required accommodations.
    For additional information, please contact Bill Collins at (202) 
502-8248, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#691e000505000804470a06050500071a290f0c1b0a470e061f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="27504e4b4b4e464a0944484b4b4e4954674142554409404851">[email protected]</span></a> or Irene Szopo at (202) 502-8323, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#600912050e054e131a0f100f20060512034e070f16"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="86eff4e3e8e3a8f5fce9f6e9c6e0e3f4e5a8e1e9f0">[email protected]</span></a>.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E7-7863 Filed 4-24-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Case: 2:12-cv-01080-EAS-MRA Doc #: 33 Filed: 02/25/14 Page: 1 of 21  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-01080-EAS-MRA Doc #: 33 Filed: 02/25/14 Page: 2 of 21  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-01080-EAS-MRA Doc #: 33 Filed: 02/25/14 Page: 3 of 21  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-01080-EAS-MRA Doc #: 33 Filed: 02/25/14 Page: 4 of 21  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-01080-EAS-MRA Doc #: 33 Filed: 02/25/14 Page: 5 of 21  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-01080-EAS-MRA Doc #: 33 Filed: 02/25/14 Page: 6 of 21  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-01080-EAS-MRA Doc #: 33 Filed: 02/25/14 Page: 7 of 21  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-01080-EAS-MRA Doc #: 33 Filed: 02/25/14 Page: 8 of 21  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-01080-EAS-MRA Doc #: 33 Filed: 02/25/14 Page: 9 of 21  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-01080-EAS-MRA Doc #: 33 Filed: 02/25/14 Page: 10 of 21  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-01080-EAS-MRA Doc #: 33 Filed: 02/25/14 Page: 11 of 21  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-01080-EAS-MRA Doc #: 33 Filed: 02/25/14 Page: 12 of 21  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-01080-EAS-MRA Doc #: 33 Filed: 02/25/14 Page: 13 of 21  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-01080-EAS-MRA Doc #: 33 Filed: 02/25/14 Page: 14 of 21  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-01080-EAS-MRA Doc #: 33 Filed: 02/25/14 Page: 15 of 21  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-01080-EAS-MRA Doc #: 33 Filed: 02/25/14 Page: 16 of 21  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-01080-EAS-MRA Doc #: 33 Filed: 02/25/14 Page: 17 of 21  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-01080-EAS-MRA Doc #: 33 Filed: 02/25/14 Page: 18 of 21  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-01080-EAS-MRA Doc #: 33 Filed: 02/25/14 Page: 19 of 21  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-01080-EAS-MRA Doc #: 33 Filed: 02/25/14 Page: 20 of 21  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-01080-EAS-MRA Doc #: 33 Filed: 02/25/14 Page: 21 of 21  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-11T18:47:51-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
STEAM ELECTRIC

CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE

EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0819

DCN: ________________________________________

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT 

CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION 

(CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.

SE04360A138
# C_2018104EN.01002701.xml

| 19.3.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 104/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.3.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 104/27

---

Judgment of the General Court of 1 February 2018 — European Dynamics Luxembourg and Others v ECHA

(Case T-477/15) (1)

1

((Public supply contracts - Tender procedure - Provisions of information technology (IT) services for the applications of the ECHA - Rejection of an offer by a tenderer - Award criteria - Obligation to state reasons - Manifest errors of assessment - Non-contractual liability))

(2018/C 104/34)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicants: European Dynamics Luxembourg SA (Luxembourg, Luxembourg), European Dynamics Belgium SA (Brussels, Belgium), Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE (Athens, Greece) (represented by: M. Sfyri, D. Papadopoulou and C.-N. Dede, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendants: European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) (represented initially by: E. Maurage, W. Broere and M. Heikkilä, and subsequently by W. Broere and M. Heikkilä, acting as Agents, and by J. Stuyck and A.M. Vandromme, lawyers)

Defendants:

Re:

Re:

Application, first, under Article 263 TFEU, for annulment of the decisions notified to the applicants by letter of 25 June 2015, by which the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) rejected their tender for the award of contract No ECHA/2014/86 for the provision of IT services for the IT applications of ECHA and awarded that contract to another bidder and, secondly, under Article 268 TFEU, for compensation for the damage which the applicants allegedly suffered.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders European Dynamics Luxembourg SA, European Dynamics Belgium SA and Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE to bear its own costs and those incurred by the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA). |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders European Dynamics Luxembourg SA, European Dynamics Belgium SA and Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE to bear its own costs and those incurred by the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA).

---

(1)  OJ C 363, 3.11.2015.

1

---
No. 41994.

#### Protest 104403-G of R. H. Macy & Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

On the record presented Normandy laces similar to those involved in *Amrein*v. *United States*(T. D. 49551) and embroidered dresses like those the subject of *United States*v. *Smith*(12 Ct. Cust. Appls, 834, T. D. 40544) were held dutiable at 75 percent under paragraph 1430 as claimed.
# C_2015118EN.01001402.xml

| 13.4.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 118/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.4.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 118/14

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Hannover (Germany) lodged on 8 January 2015 — Alexandra Stück v Swiss International Air Lines AG

(Case C-3/15)

(2015/C 118/19)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Amtsgericht Hannover

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Alexandra Stück

Applicant:

Defendant: Swiss International Air Lines AG

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Is the Agreement on air transport between the Swiss Confederation and the European Community (1) of 21 June 1999, as amended by Decision No 2/2010 of the Community/Switzerland Air Transport Committee (2) of 26 November 2010, to be interpreted as meaning that Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91 (3) [‘the Air Passenger Rights Regulation’] is applicable, in accordance with Article 3(1)(b), also to passengers departing from an airport located in a third country to an airport in Switzerland with a Swiss air carrier?

1

2

3

---

(1)  OJ 2002 L 114, p. 73.

1

(2)  Decision No 2/2010 of the Joint Community/Switzerland Air Transport Committee set up under the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport of 26 November 2010 replacing the Annex to the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport, OJ 2010 L 347, p. 54.

2

(3)  OJ 2004 L 46, p. 1.

3

---
# C_2015311EN.01001402.xml

| 21.9.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 311/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.9.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 311/14

---

Appeal brought on 28 January 2015 by Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) delivered on 25 November 2014 in Case T-556/12: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) v Royalton Overseas Ltd

(Case C-36/15 P)

(2015/C 311/18)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, Agent)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: Royalton Overseas Ltd, S.C. Romarose Invest Srl

Other parties to the proceedings:

The case was removed from the Register of the Court of Justice by order of the Court of 29 April 2015.

---
JUDGMENT

Court of Appeals 

 

First District of Texas 

NO. 01-13-00593-CR

BOBBY DEWAYNE EVANS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Appeal from the Criminal District Court of Jefferson County. (Tr. Ct. No. 12-14438).

This case is an appeal from the final judgment signed by the trial court on June 17, 

2013, which was transferred by the Supreme Court of Texas to this Court from the Court 

of Appeals for the Ninth District of Texas. After submitting the case on the appellate 

record and the arguments properly raised by the parties, the Court holds that the trial 

court’s judgment contains no reversible error. Accordingly, the Court affirms the trial 

court’s judgment.

The Court orders that this decision be certified below for observance.

Judgment rendered March 31, 2015.

Panel consists of Justices Massengale, Brown, and Huddle. Opinion delivered by Justice 

Massengale.
Exhibit 99.1





                                   CERTIFICATE
                                 furnished under
                 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

     I, Charles W. Mueller,  chief executive  officer of Union Electric Company,
hereby  certify that to the best of my  knowledge,  the  accompanying  Report of
Union  Electric  Company on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 fully
complies  with the  requirements  of  Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities
Exchange  Act of 1934 and  that  information  contained  in such  Report  fairly
presents,  in all material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of
operations of Union Electric Company.



                                            /s/ Charles W. Mueller
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Charles W. Mueller
                                            Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
                                            (Principal Executive Officer)


Date:  May 14, 2003



A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided  to Union  Electric  Company  and will be  retained  by Union  Electric
Company and  furnished to the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its staff
upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 7
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                         1,042,041
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                        1,042,041
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                          1,042,041
<EQUITIES>                                       2,767
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                               1,044,808
<CASH>                                          30,429
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                              72,225
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                           7,049
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,512,601
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                514,392
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                            247,570
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    224,950
<COMMON>                                        70,072
<OTHER-SE>                                     196,927
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,512,601
<PREMIUMS>                                     662,451
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                             55,235
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                               6,540
<OTHER-INCOME>                                       0
<BENEFITS>                                     530,572
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                     25,319
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                            35,031
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                122,611
<INCOME-TAX>                                    40,755
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             81,856
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    81,856
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.04
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
122 STAT. 648 PUBLIC LAW 110–192—FEB. 29, 2008 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 5478: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 154 (2008): 

Feb. 25, considered and passed House. 

Feb. 28, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 110–192 

110th Congress 

An Act 

To provide for the continued minting and issuance of certain $1 coins in 2008. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, That clause 

(i) of section 5112(n)(1)(B) of title 31, United States Code (as in 

effect on the day before the date of the enactment of Public Law 

110–82) shall continue in effect, notwithstanding the amendment 

made by section 3 of Public Law 110–82, until the effective date 

of the amendment made by section 2 of such Public Law. 

Approved February 29, 2008. 

31 USC 5112 

note. 

Feb. 29, 2008 

[H.R. 5478] 


jbridges on POFP91QD1 with PUBLIC LAWS