alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(Reap. Dec. 10273)

#### Frasers *v.*United States

Entry No. 785243-1/2, etc.

(Decided on rehearing [not published] June 19, 1962)

*Barnes, Richardson <&■ Colburn*for the plaintiff.

*Joseph D. Guilfoyle,*Acting Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

LawreNCe, Judge:

The appeals for a reappraisement, enumerated in the schedule attached to and made a part of this decision, involve *680tbe proper value for dutiable purposes of certain table cutlery, smokers’ articles, and so forth.

Tbe appeals have been submitted for decision upon a stipulation of the parties hereto, wherein it has been agreed as follows:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between tbe parties hereto, subject to tbe approval of tbe Court:

> 1. Tbat on or about tbe date of exportation of tbe merchandise tbe subject of tbe appeals for reappraisement, enumerated on Schedule “A” hereto attached and made a part hereof, such or similar merchandise was not freely offered for sale for home consumption to all purchasers in tbe ordinary course of trade in tbe principal markets of Germany.

> 2. Tbat on or about tbe date of exportation of tbe merchandise involved herein, such or similar merchandise was not freely offered for sale to all purchasers in tbe ordinary course of trade in tbe principal markets of Germany for exportation to the United States.

> 3. Tbat on or about tbe date of exportation of tbe merchandise involved herein, such or similar imported merchandise was not freely offered for sale for domestic consumption in tbe principal markets of tbe United States to all purchasers in tbe ordinary course of trade.

> 4. With regard to tbe items marked “A” and initialed RM (Examiner’s Initials) by Examiner Robert Muir (Examiner’s Name) on tbe invoices covered by the above-entitled appeals, tbe cost of production as defined in Section 402(f) of the Tariff Act of 1930 is equal to tbe indicated Deutsche mark figures noted in green ink, less 33%%, less 3%, less 4%, plus tbe proportionate part of tbe export packing as indicated on the invoice.

> 5. With regard to tbe items marked “B” and initialed RM (Examiner’s Initials) by Examiner Robert Muir (Examiner’s Name) on tbe invoices covered by tbe above-entitled appeals, tbe cost of production as defined in Section 402(f) of the Tariff Act of 1930 is equal to tbe invoiced unit values, in United States dollars, net, packed.

Upon the record before the court, I find and hold that cost of production, as that value is defined in section 402a(f) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, 91 Treas. Dec. 295, T.D. 54165 (19 U.S.C. § 1402(f)), is the proper basis of value for the articles in issue and that such value is as indicated in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the quoted matter, *supra.*As to all other merchandise, the appeals for a reappraisement, having been abandoned, are dismissed.

Judgment will issue accordingly.
# C_2015155EN.01000701.xml

| 11.5.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 155/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.5.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 155/7

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Wuppertal (Germany) lodged on 2 February 2015 — Hartmut Frenzel v Resort Marina Oolderhuuske BV

(Case C-39/15)

(2015/C 155/08)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Landgericht Wuppertal

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Hartmut Frenzel

Applicant:

Defendant: Resort Marina Oolderhuuske BV

Defendant:

The case was removed from the Register of the Court of Justice by order of the Court of 26 February 2015.

---
**Certification of the Chief Financial OfficerPursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)**

                   I, Frederic F. Brace, the Executive Vice President and Chief FinancialOfficer of United Air Lines, Inc. (the "Company") certify that to the bestof my knowledge, based upon a review of the quarterly report on Form 10-Qfor the period ended June 30, 2006 of the Company (the "Report"):(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operationsof the Company. /s/ Frederic F. Brace________Frederic F. BraceUnited Air Lines. Inc.Executive Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerAugust 11, 2006
# C_2017293EN.01000401.xml

| 4.9.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 293/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.9.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 293/4

---

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 13 July 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale amministrativo regionale per la Lombardia — Italy) — Malpensa Logistica Europa SpA v SEA — Società Esercizi Aeroportuali SpA

(Case C-701/15) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Public procurement - Transport - Definition of ‘exploitation of a geographical area for the purpose of the provisions of airports or other terminal facilities to carriers by air’ - Directives 2004/17/EC and 96/67/EC - National legislation which does not require a tendering procedure to be conducted prior to the allocation of areas within an airport))

(2017/C 293/05)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunale amministrativo regionale per la Lombardia

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Malpensa Logistica Europa SpA

Applicant:

Defendant: SEA — Società Esercizi Aeroportuali SpA

Defendant:

Intervening party: Beta-Trans SpA

Intervening party:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 7 of Directive 2004/17/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 coordinating the procurement procedures of entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors is to be interpreted as not precluding national legislation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which does not require a public selection procedure to be conducted prior to the allocation, including a temporary allocation, of areas within airports to be used for the provision of groundhandling services for which no remuneration is to be paid by the manager of the airport.

---

(1)  OJ C 136, 18.4.2016.

1

---
No. 47561.

#### Protests 988122-G, etc., of Maray Corp. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following *Bullocks*v. *United States*(6 Cust. Ct. 110, C. D. 441) the merchandise in question was held not subject to countervailing duty. The protests were therefore sustained as to certain of the items.
#### L. Bamberger & Co. *v.*United States

No. 7416.

Invoice dated London, England, November 1943.

Certified November 1943.

Entered at Newark, N. J., December 24, 1943.

Entry No. N-451.

(Decided October 22, 1947)

*Strauss & Hedges (Hadley S. King*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Cole, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement concerns the proper dutiable value of men’s and boys’ dressing gowns exported from London, England, and entered at the port of New York.

An agreed set of facts, upon which the case is before me for decision, establishes foreign value, section 402 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended by the Customs Administrative Act of 1938 (19 U. S. C. § 1402 (c)), to be the proper basis for appraisement of the instant merchandise, and that such statutory value for the articles in question is the invoice unit prices less three and three-quarters per centum discount, plus twelve and one-half per centum, plus packing cases as invoiced. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
# L_2011085EN.01S00301.xml

| 31.3.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 85/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.3.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 85/s3

---

NOTE TO THE READER

| Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 131/2010 was withdrawn prior to adoption and is therefore blank. |
| --- |

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 131/2010 was withdrawn prior to adoption and is therefore blank.

---
Office of Ground Water and Drinking Water

February 24, 2016

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Basis for Exp edited Approval of Mitchell M5331 Revision 1.2

FROM: Glynda Smith and Steve Wendelken

Standards and Risk Management Division, Technical Support Center

TO: The Record

Background

This memo documents the modification of Mitchell Method M 5331 Revision 1.2 to include the option of

using a solid

- state laser in place of a light emitting diode (LED) as the light source for the turbidimeter.

The manufacturer ci tes multiple advantages relating to the use of these solid

- state components, which

include longer light source lifetime, greater source stability, lower cost, better stray light rejection,

better shock resistance and lower power consumption.

Evaluation s

S ee attachment EPA justification for laser use in method M5331.docx

Recommendation

The performance of Mitchell Method 5331 Revision 1.2 will be equivalent to or better than the currently

approved M5331 Revision 1.1 method

.
# C_2017253EN.01000301.xml

| 4.8.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 253/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.8.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 253/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

3 August 2017

(2017/C 253/04)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1860 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 130,91 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4381 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,90318 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,6093 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1501 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,3768 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,965 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 303,74 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2526 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5655 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 4,1992 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4943 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4951 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,2724 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5986 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6130 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 336,54 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 15,7628 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,9726 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4063 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 804,04 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 5,0780 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 59,625 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 71,6789 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,429 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,7017 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 21,1435 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 75,5210 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1860

JPY

Japanese yen

130,91

DKK

Danish krone

7,4381

GBP

Pound sterling

0,90318

SEK

Swedish krona

9,6093

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1501

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,3768

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,965

HUF

Hungarian forint

303,74

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2526

RON

Romanian leu

4,5655

TRY

Turkish lira

4,1992

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4943

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4951

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,2724

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5986

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6130

KRW

South Korean won

1 336,54

ZAR

South African rand

15,7628

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,9726

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4063

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 804,04

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

5,0780

PHP

Philippine peso

59,625

RUB

Russian rouble

71,6789

THB

Thai baht

39,429

BRL

Brazilian real

3,7017

MXN

Mexican peso

21,1435

INR

Indian rupee

75,5210

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
# C_2016048EN.01001801.xml

| 8.2.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 48/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.2.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 48/18

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France) lodged on 23 November 2015 — A-Rosa Flussschiff GmbH v Union de recouvrement des cotisations de sécurité sociale et d’allocations familiales d’Alsace (URSSAF), Sozialversicherunganstalt des Kantons Graubünden (Social Insurance Institution for the Canton of Graubünden)

(Case C-620/15)

(2016/C 048/24)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Referring court

Cour de cassation

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: A-Rosa Flussschiff GmbH

Appellant:

Respondents: Union de recouvrement des cotisations de sécurité sociale et d’allocations familiales d’Alsace (URSSAF), Sozialversicherunganstalt des Kantons Graubünden (Social Insurance Institution for the Canton of Graubünden)

Respondents:

Question referred

Question referred

Is the effect of an E 101 certificate issued, in accordance with Articles 11(1) and Article 12a(1a) of Regulation (EEC) No 574/72 of 21 March 1972 fixing the procedure for implementing Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons, to self-employed persons and to the members of their families moving within the Community, (1) by the institution designated by the competent authority of the Member State whose social security legislation remains applicable to the situation of the employee, binding, first, on the institutions and authorities of the host Member State and, secondly, on the courts of that Member State, where it is found that the conditions under which the employee carries out his activity clearly do not fall within the material scope of the exceptions set out in Article 14(1) and (2) of Regulation No 1408/71? (2)

1

2

---

(1)  OJ 1972 L 74, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ 1971 L 149, p. 2.

2

---
# C_2017053EN.01001201.xml

| 20.2.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 53/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.2.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 53/12

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 21 December 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Appeal (England & Wales) (Civil Division) — United Kingdom) — Swiss International Air Lines AG v The Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change, Environment Agency

(Case C-272/15) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Directive 2003/87/EC - Scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading - Obligation to surrender emission allowances in respect of flights between EU Member States and most third countries - Decision No 377/2013/EU - Article 1 - Temporary derogation - Exclusion of flights to and from airports situated in Switzerland - Difference of treatment of third countries - General principle of equal treatment - Inapplicable))

(2017/C 053/14)

Language of the case: English

Referring court

Referring court

Court of Appeal (England & Wales) (Civil Division)

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Swiss International Air Lines AG

Appellant:

Respondents: The Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change, Environment Agency

Respondents:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Examination in the light of the principle of equal treatment of Decision No 377/2013/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 April 2013 derogating temporarily from Directive 2003/87/EC establishing a scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community has disclosed nothing to affect the validity of that decision in so far as the temporary derogation provided for in Article 1 of that decision from the requirements laid down in Article 12(2a) and Article 16 of Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 2003 establishing a scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community and amending Council Directive 96/61/EC, as amended by Directive 2008/101/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008, with respect to the surrender of greenhouse gas emission allowances in respect of flights operated in 2012 between Member States of the European Union and most third countries, does not apply to, inter alia, flights to and from airports situated in Switzerland.

---

(1)  OJ C 279, 24.8.2015.

1

---
# C_2016068EN.01002102.xml

| 22.2.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 68/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.2.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 68/21

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado Contencioso-Administrativo de Oviedo (Spain) lodged on 27 November 2015 — Carlos Álvarez Santirso v Consejería de Educación, Cultura y Deporte del Principado de Asturias

(Case C-631/15)

(2016/C 068/28)

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Referring court

Juzgado Contencioso-Administrativo de Oviedo

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Carlos Álvarez Santirso

Applicant:

Defendant: Consejería de Educación, Cultura y Deporte del Principado de Asturias

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Must Clause 4 of the Framework Agreement to which Council Directive 1999/70/EC (1) of 28 June 1999 on fixed-term work refers be interpreted as precluding regional legislation such as the Law of the Principality of Asturias 6/2009 of 29 December 2009 on public teaching evaluation and incentives which, under Article 2, makes eligibility for inclusion in the evaluation plan (with the resulting entitlement to the associated economic incentives) dependent on having the status of a career civil servant, thereby excluding interim civil servants?

1

---

(1)  Council Directive 1999/70/EC of 28 June 1999 concerning the framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP (OJ 1999 L 175, p. 43).

1

---
# C_2016279EN.01000401.xml

| 1.8.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 279/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.8.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 279/4

---

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 21 April 2016 — ultra air GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office, Donaldson Filtration Deutschland GmbH

(Case C-232/15 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - EU trade mark - EU word mark ultra.air ultrafilter - Invalidity proceedings - Absolute ground for refusal or for invalidity - Descriptive character - Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Article 7(1)(b) and (c) and Article 52(1)(a) - Declaration of invalidity by the Board of Appeal - Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded))

(2016/C 279/05)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Appellant: ultra air GmbH (represented by: C. König, Rechtsanwalt)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: S. Hanne, acting as Agent), Donaldson Filtration Deutschland GmbH (represented by: N. Siebertz and M. Teworte-Vey, Rechtsanwältinnen)

Other parties to the proceedings:

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

| 2. | ultra air GmbH shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

ultra air GmbH shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 262, 10.8.2015

1

---
EXHIBIT 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






I, John C. Lawrence, President, and Chief Executive Officer of United States Antimony Corporation (the "Company") do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:





This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






Date:
By:
/s/ John C. LawrenceJohn C. LawrencePresident and Chief Executive Officer
Case: 2:12-cv-00888-EAS-NMK Doc #: 26 Filed: 07/08/13 Page: 1 of 1  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-11T14:50:08-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
### Cauldron subsidence of Oligocene age at Mount Lewis, northern Shoshone Range, Nevada

By: Chester T. WruckeMiles L. Silberman

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp876

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

No abstract available.

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
# C_2016270EN.01001201.xml

| 25.7.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 270/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.7.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 270/12

---

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 7 April 2016 — (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Frosinone — Italy) — Criminal proceedings against Antonio Paolo Conti

(Case C-504/15) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - Identical questions referred for a preliminary ruling - Articles 49 and 56 TFEU - Freedom of establishment - Freedom to provide services - Betting and gaming - National legislation - Reorganisation of the licensing system through the alignment of licence expiry dates - New call for tenders - Licences for a shorter term than that of the former licences - Transfer, free of charge, of the rights to use tangible and intangible assets owned constituting the network for the management and collection of bets - Restriction - Overriding reasons in the public interest - Proportionality))

(2016/C 270/15)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunale di Frosinone

Criminal proceedings against

Criminal proceedings against

Antonio Paolo Conti

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

Articles 49 TFEU and 56 TFEU must be interpreted as precluding a restrictive national provision, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which requires a licensee of a betting and gambling service to transfer, free of charge, on the cessation of business as a result of the expiry of the final term of the licence, the rights to use tangible and intangible assets which he owns and which constitute his network for the management and collection of bets, in so far as that restriction goes beyond what is necessary to attain the objective actually pursued by that provision, which is for the referring court to verify.

---

(1)  OJ C 406, 7.12.2015.

1

---
No. 54249.

#### L. Bamberger & Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 134124-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.