alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE> 1
Exhibit 31b
CERTIFICATIONS

I, Christopher J. Eperjesy, certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Twin Disc,
Incorporated;

2.    Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.    The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

      a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

      b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

      c)  presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation
as of the Evaluation Date;

5.    The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent function):

      a)  all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

      b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls;
and

6.    The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or
in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent
to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions
with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date:  February 7, 2005                  /s/ CHRISTOPHER J. EPERJESY
                                         Christopher J. Eperjesy
                                         Vice President - Finance, Treasurer,
                                         Chief Financial Officer
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JU NE 12, 2014

NO. 03

- 14

- 00037

- CV

Manouchehr Ziari, SAIF Corporation d/b/a Ace Taxi, and Ace Taxi, Appellant s

v.

The City of Austin, Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, GO ODWIN, AND FIELD

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE FIELD

This is an appeal from the judg ment signed by the tr i a l court on October 23, 2013. Having

reviewed the record , the Court holds that Manouchehr Ziari, SAIF Corporation d/b/a Ace Taxi,

and Ace Taxi ha ve not prosecuted their appeal and did not comply with a notice from the Clerk

of this C ourt. Therefore, the Court dismisses the appeal for want of prosecution. The appellant s

shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and the court below.
Case No. 13,302.

#### STAPLES v. HARTFORD CITY GASLIGHT CO.

[Nowhere reported; opinion not now accessible]
No. 59134.

protests 173125-K, etc. (Ogdensburg).

#### A. N. Deringer, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of beef similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Swift & Company et al.*v. *United States*(33 Cust. Ct. 212, C. D. 1655), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
# C_2015228EN.01000402.xml

| 13.7.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 228/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.7.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 228/4

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék (Hungary) lodged on 21 April 2015 — Daimler AG v Együd Garage Gépjárműjavító és Értékesítő Kft.

(Case C-179/15)

(2015/C 228/05)

Language of the case: Hungarian

Referring court

Referring court

Fővárosi Törvényszék

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Daimler AG

Applicant:

Defendant: Együd Garage Gépjárműjavító és Értékesítő Kft.

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Must Article 5(1)(b) of First Council Directive 89/104/EEC (1) of 21 December 1988 to approximate the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks be interpreted as meaning that the trade mark proprietor is entitled to take action against a third party named in an advertisement on the internet, which features a sign likely to be confused with the trade mark, referring to a service of that third party identical to the goods or services for which the trade mark is registered, in such a way that the public might be given the mistaken impression that there is an official commercial relationship between the undertaking of that third party and the trade mark proprietor, even though the advertisement was not placed on the internet by the person featuring in it or on his behalf, and it is possible to access that advertisement on the internet despite the fact that the person named in it took all reasonable steps to have it removed, but did not succeed in doing so?

1

---

(1)  First Council Directive 89/104/EEC of 21 December 1988 to approximate the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks (OJ 1989 L 40, p. 1).

1

---
No. 47571.

#### Protests 783845-G, etc., of Sperry Flour Co., et al. (Portland, Oreg., etc.).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
No. 49372.

#### Protests 996736-G, etc., of Suen Mark & Co. (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Cole,-J.

The merchandise was classified under the same paragraphs and claimed dutiable at the same rates as similar merchandise covered by the decision in *Quong Yuen Shing*v. *United States*(31 C. C. P. A. 43, C. A. D. 247). In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of said cited case the merchandise at bar was found to contain salt and was therefore excluded from paragraph 5. The protests were sustained to this extent.
No. 53180.

#### Kwong Shing Lung Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 607498-G, etc. (San Francisco and Seattle).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
Electronically FiledIntermediate Court of Appeals3048612-JUN-201308:54 AM
-

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

(Mark One)

[x] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2008

OR

[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ____________ to ___________

Commission file number 0-2666

250 WEST 57th ST. ASSOCIATES L.L.C.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

A New York Limited Liability Company 13-6083380

(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer

incorporation or organization) Identification No.)

60 East 42nd Street, New York, New York 10165

(Address of principal executive offices)

(Zip Code)

(212) 687-8700

(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

N/A

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since lastreport)

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed allreports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that theRegistrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to suchfiling requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [ X ]. No [ ] .

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shellcompany (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act) Yes [ ] No [ X ] .

 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a largeaccelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smallerreporting company.

Large Accelerated Filer [ ] Accelerated Filer [ ]Non-Accelerated Filer [ ] 

Smaller Reporting Company [X]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements.

250 West 57th St. Associates L.L.C.

(A Limited Liability Company)

Condensed Balance Sheets

(Unaudited)
EXHIBIT 24


                           250 WEST 57TH STREET ASSOCIATES

                                   FILE NO. 0-2666

                                  POWER OF ATTORNEY



                   We, the undersigned general partners of 250 West 57th

         Street Associates ("Associates"), hereby severally constitute and

         appoint Stanley Katzman and Richard A. Shapiro and each of them,

         individually, our true and lawful attorneys with full power to

         them and each of them to sign for us, and in our names and in the

         capacities indicated below on behalf of Associates, any and all

         reports or other statements required to be filed with the

         Securities and Exchange Commission under Section 13 or 15(d) of

         the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. 

              Signature              Title                    Date


         /s/Peter L. Malkin
            Peter L. Malkin       General Partner        March 29, 1996


         /s/Anthony E. Malkin
            Anthony E. Malkin     General Partner        May 14, 1998<PAGE>







         STATE OF NEW YORK   )
                             : ss.:
         COUNTY OF NEW YORK  )


                   On the 29th day of March, 1996 before me personally came

         PETER L. MALKIN, to me known to be the individual described in and

         who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he

         executed the same.  



                                       /s/Notary Public
                                          NOTARY PUBLIC





































                                         -2-<PAGE>







         STATE OF NEW YORK   )
                             : ss.:
         COUNTY OF NEW YORK  )


                   On the 14th day of May, 1998 before me personally came

         ANTHONY E. MALKIN, to me known to be the individual described in

         and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that

         he executed the same.  



                                       /s/Notary Public
                                          NOTARY PUBLIC





































                                         -3-
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

LUIS ENRIQUE MARRERO,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 547 MAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 10th day of March, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
From: "Achanta, Chandana L." <Ch andana_L._Achanta@ omb.eop.gov>

To: William Charmley/AA/USEPA/US@EPA, Ro bin Moran/AA/USEPA/US@EPA, Maureen

Delaney/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, <rebecca.yoon@ dot.gov>, <Neil.Eisner@dot.gov>,

<Steve.Wood@dot.gov>

Date: 03/16/2010 04:24 PM

Subject: Conf call with Commerce

Hi All,

Commerce would like a conference call with EPA and DOT staff tomorrow. Are you all available

at 10am? I have not received any comments from them yet. Most agencies are planning to

submit COB today and one or two tomorrow.

Thanks.

Chandana
# Official Journal C 53/2007

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 53 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 508 March 2007 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 53

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 508 March 2007

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES |
| | Commission |
| 2007/C 053/01 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |
| 2007/C 053/02 | New national side of euro circulation coins | 2 |
| | NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES |
| 2007/C 053/03 | Commission notice pursuant to Article 4(1)(a) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2408/92 — Amendment of public service obligations imposed on certain scheduled air services in Spain (1) | 3 |
| | NOTICES CONCERNING THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AREA |
| | EFTA Surveillance Authority |
| 2007/C 053/04 | 54th amendment of the State Aid Guidelines — EFTA Surveillance Authority decision to propose appropriate measures | 4 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES

Commission

2007/C 053/01

Euro exchange rates

1

2007/C 053/02

New national side of euro circulation coins

2

NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES

2007/C 053/03

Commission notice pursuant to Article 4(1)(a) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2408/92 — Amendment of public service obligations imposed on certain scheduled air services in Spain (1)

3

NOTICES CONCERNING THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AREA

EFTA Surveillance Authority

2007/C 053/04

54th amendment of the State Aid Guidelines — EFTA Surveillance Authority decision to propose appropriate measures

4

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMPETITION POLICY |
| | Commission |
| 2007/C 053/05 | State aid — Poland — State aid NN 73/06 (ex N 340/2006) — Restructuring aid in favour of Odlewnia Żeliwa ŚREM S.A. — Invitation to submit comments pursuant to Article 88(2) of the EC Treaty (1) | 5 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMPETITION POLICY

Commission

2007/C 053/05

State aid — Poland — State aid NN 73/06 (ex N 340/2006) — Restructuring aid in favour of Odlewnia Żeliwa ŚREM S.A. — Invitation to submit comments pursuant to Article 88(2) of the EC Treaty (1)

5

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
July 15 , 2015

Mr. James Duisenberg

James Duisenberg d/b/a Tap Productions

495 Tabor Drive Unit #3

Scotts Valley, CA 95066

Dear M r. Duisenberg :

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to proces s your request for an exemption. Upon

further review we have noticed you are missing the public interest statement. It explains w hy

we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can No t Process Your Request

We entered your June 30 , 2015

, exemption request into the public docket (No. FA A

- 201 5

-

1 892 ), but we are unable to process your request any fu rther. The information you sent does

no t comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request

any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would

benefit the public as a whole.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information desc ribed

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do No t Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267

- 9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

B rittany Newton

Program Analyst , Airmen and

Ai rspace Rules Divisio n

Enclosure3
# C_2018052EN.01000301.xml

| 12.2.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 52/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.2.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 52/3

---

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 7 December 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de Primera Instancia de Jerez de la Frontera) — Banco Santander SA v Cristobalina Sánchez López

(Case C-598/15) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Directive 93/13/EEC - Consumer contracts - Unfair terms - Powers of the national court - Effectiveness of the protection afforded to consumers - Mortgage loan agreement - Extrajudicial enforcement procedure - Simplified declaratory court procedure for recognition of the real rights of the successful bidder))

(2018/C 052/03)

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Referring court

Juzgado de Primera Instancia de Jerez de la Frontera

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Banco Santander SA

Applicant:

Defendant: Cristobalina Sánchez López

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 6(1) and Article 7(1) of Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer do not apply to proceedings such as those at issue in the main proceedings, brought by the successful bidder in an auction of immovable property, following extrajudicial enforcement of a mortgage granted over that property by a consumer to a creditor acting in the course of trade, such proceedings having been brought for the purpose of protecting real rights lawfully acquired by the successful bidder, provided that, first, the proceedings are independent of the legal relationship between that creditor and the consumer and, second, the mortgage has been enforced, the immovable property sold, the real rights over that property transferred, and the consumer has not availed himself of the legal remedies provided in that context

---

(1)  OJ C 38, 1.2.2016.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>            5
<MULTIPLIER>         1

<S>                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                     MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                             3,445,000
<SECURITIES>                                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     35,765,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                               0
<INVENTORY>                                       20,345,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  61,388,000
<PP&E>                                            18,351,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                    (6,031,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   112,895,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             62,108,000
<BONDS>                                                    0
<COMMON>                                             795,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                      0
<PREFERRED>                                                0
<OTHER-SE>                                        31,459,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     112,895,000
<SALES>                                           42,886,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  43,451,000
<CGS>                                             27,734,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     21,477,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                           0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 1,273,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (7,033,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                          61,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (7,094,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                            0
<CHANGES>                                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (7,094,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          (0.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          (0.09)



</TABLE>
# C_2015429EN.01003002.xml

| 21.12.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 429/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.12.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 429/30

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 11 November 2015 — HA v Commission

(Case F-55/15) (1)

1

(2015/C 429/41)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 213, 29/6/2015, p. 45.

1

---
EXHIBIT 35.1








ANNUAL SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT PURSUANT TO ITEM 1123 OF REGULATION AB





CARMAX BUSINESS SERVICES, LLC








The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of CarMax Business Services, LLC, as Servicer pursuant to Section 3.10 of the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of February 1, 2016 (the "Sale and Servicing Agreement") among CarMax Auto Owner Trust 2016-1, as Issuer (the "Issuer"), CarMax Auto Funding LLC, as Depositor, and CarMax Business Services, LLC, as Servicer (the "Servicer"), does hereby certify that:





|   |                                                                                                              
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | CarMax Business Services, LLC is, as of the date hereof, the Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement.




|   |                                                                                      
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | The undersigned is duly authorized to execute and deliver this Officer's Certificate.




|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|3. | A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period beginning onMarch 1, 2018and ending onFebruary 28, 2019and of the Servicer's performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement was made under my supervision.  To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout such period.







Capitalized terms used in this certificate and not otherwise defined herein have the meanings assigned to them in the Sale and Servicing Agreement.





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of the Servicer, has duly executed this Officer's Certificate this 23rd day of May, 2019 .





CARMAX BUSINESS SERVICES, LLC





/s/ Enrique Mayor-Mora


Enrique Mayor-Mora


Vice President and Treasurer
No. 62051.

#### Schlumberger Well Surveying Corp. *v.*United States,

protests 279771-K, 292480-K, and 292487-K (Galveston).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of articles similar to articles of cellulose acetate, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.