alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

    Certification by the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
          Relating to a Periodic Report Containing Financial Statements

     I, David W. Trego, Chief Executive Officer, and I, John C. Barney, Chief
Financial Officer, of UGI Utilities, Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation (the
"Company"), hereby certify that to our knowledge:

     (1)  The Company's periodic report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March
          31, 2006 (the "Form 10-Q") fully complies with the requirements of
          Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

                                      * * *

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER                 CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


/s/ David W. Trego                      /s/ John C. Barney
-------------------------------------   ----------------------------------------
David W. Trego                          John C. Barney

Date: May 8, 2006                       Date: May 8, 2006
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-4229

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

LEONARD H. MITCHELL,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. M. J. Garbis, District Judge. (CR-95-315-

MJG)

Submitted: November 21, 1996 Decided: December 6, 1996

Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Phillip M. Sutley, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellant. Lynne A.

Battaglia, United States Attorney, Martin J. Clarke, Special

Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Leonard H. Mitchell was convicted of possessing a firearm

while being a convicted felon, 18 U.S.C.A. § 922(g)(1) (West Supp.

1996), and was sentenced as an armed career offender. 18 U.S.C.A.

§ 924(e) (West Supp. 1996). He seeks to appeal his 265-month sentence, contending that the district court abused its discretion by

refusing to depart downward because of his age (42) and the difference between the armed career offender sentence and the guideline range which would have applied were he not a career offender.

A sentencing court's discretionary decision not to depart from

the guideline range is not subject to appellate review. United

States v. Bayerle, 898 F.2d 28, 31 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 498

U.S. 819 (1990). However, if the court bases its decision not to

depart on a perceived lack of legal authority, its decision is a

legal one which is reviewed de novo. United States v. Hall, 977

F.2d 861, 863 (4th Cir. 1992). Here, the district court stated its

belief that a departure was not appropriate and, in any case, would

not be upheld on the grounds urged. The court expressed no desire

to depart. We find that the court exercised its discretion in

deciding not to depart.

We therefore dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# Go hunting this weekend

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  Go hunting this weekend 
                    -           Creator        
                    -  United States. National Guard Bureau 
                    -           Publisher        
                    -  United States. National Guard Bureau 
                    -           Subjects        
                    -  United States. National Guard Bureau 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1980-1990 
                    -           Subject: Place        
                    -  United States 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  151 × 41 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Zeutschel OS 12000 Scanner at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at the University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  022934241.jpg; 022934241.jpg 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
Application for Exemption 14 CFR § 11.81 Section 333

I am a Documentary Filmmaker working on an a unique Agriculture Documentary that will help educate 

the public about a particular favorite food. From the farm to your kitchen table - it's all about growing 

your food and Growing Peanut Butter.

The film already has a section of footage from a camera mounted from regular aircraft. This footage 

helps to tell the story in order to better educate the public about this behind the scenes process. 

Unfortunately the footage is too shaky and needs to be recreated using a UAV. 

The area normally flown in - is very rural with few houses. The flight path would be well under 400 feet 

over trees and fields. I do intend to do other agriculture films and documentaries in the future as well. 

This approval would help me stay legal in my attempts to make sure that department is always covered.

I am aware of the importance of following common sense procedures when piloting UAV aircraft. 

Considering this most footage obtained per approval of this application would be of the benefit to the 

public. Not only just for entrainment but education as well. 

The Production company is currently incorporated under the following with the included contact 

information. It would be preferred if the approval could be applied under this name if at all possible. 

Barnhart Media LCC

2319 Hwy 88

Hephzibah, GA 30833

E-mail: docquesting@gmail.com

Phone: 706 871-4436
No. 45157.

#### Protests 39752-K, etc., of Chicago Macaroni Co. of New York et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Keepe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of *Locatelli*v. *United States*(T. D. 48284 and T. D. 49302) it was held that an allowance of 2)4 percent should have been made in the weight of the cheese to compensate for the inedible coverings.
# C_2017078EN.01000402.xml

| 13.3.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 78/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.3.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 78/4

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 25 January 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Appeal — Ireland) — European arrest warrant in respect of Tomas Vilkas

(Case C-640/15) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters - Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA - European arrest warrant - Article 23 - Time limit for surrender of the requested person - Possibility of agreeing on a new surrender date on a number of occasions - Resistance of the requested person to his surrender - Force majeure))

(2017/C 078/05)

Language of the case: English

Referring court

Referring court

Court of Appeal

Party to the main proceedings

Party to the main proceedings

Tomas Vilkas

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 23(3) of Council Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA of 13 June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States, as amended by Council Framework Decision 2009/299/JHA of 26 February 2009, must be interpreted as meaning that, in a situation such as that at issue in the main proceedings, the executing and issuing judicial authorities agree on a new surrender date under that provision where the surrender of the requested person within 10 days of a first new surrender date agreed on pursuant to that provision proves impossible on account of the repeated resistance of that person, in so far as, on account of exceptional circumstances, that resistance could not have been foreseen by those authorities and the consequences of the resistance for the surrender could not have been avoided in spite of the exercise of all due care by those authorities, which is for the referring court to ascertain.

Articles 15(1) and 23 of Framework Decision 2002/584, as amended by Framework Decision 2009/299, must be interpreted as meaning that those authorities remain obliged to agree on a new surrender date if the time limits prescribed in Article 23 have expired.

---

(1)  OJ C 59, 15.2.2016.

1

---
PUBLIC LAW 110–197—MAR. 14, 2008 122 STAT. 655 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S.J. Res. 25: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 154 (2008): 

Feb. 4, considered and passed Senate. 

Mar. 5, considered and passed House. 

Æ 

Public Law 110–197 

110th Congress 

Joint Resolution 

Providing for the appointment of John W. McCarter as a citizen regent of the 

Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution. 

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the

United States of America in Congress assembled, That, in accordance with section 5581 of the Revised Statutes (20 U.S.C. 43), 

the vacancy on the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution, 

in the class other than Members of Congress, occurring because 

of the expiration of the term of Walter E. Massey of Georgia, 

is filled by the appointment of John W. McCarter of Illinois, for 

a term of 6 years, effective on the date of the enactment of this 

resolution. 

Approved March 14, 2008. 

Effective date. 

Mar. 14, 2008 

[S.J. Res. 25] 


dkrause on GSDDPC29 with PUBLIC LAWS
# C_2017038EN.01000601.xml

| 6.2.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 38/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.2.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 38/6

---

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 7 December 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Općinski sud u Velikoj Gorici — Croatia) — Vodoopskrba i odvodnja d.o.o. v Željka Klafurić

(Case C-686/15) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Environment - Directive 2000/60/EC - Framework for an EU water policy - Recovery of the costs of services connected with water use - Calculation of the amount due from the consumer - Variable component related to actual consumption and fixed component independent of that consumption))

(2017/C 038/08)

Language of the case: Croatian

Referring court

Referring court

Općinski sud u Velikoj Gorici

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Vodoopskrba i odvodnja d.o.o.

Applicant:

Defendant: Željka Klafurić

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy must be interpreted as not precluding national legislation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which provides that the price of water services invoiced to the consumer includes not only a variable component calculated according to the volume of water actually consumed by the person concerned, but also a fixed component which is not connected with that volume.

---

(1)  OJ C 111, 29.3.2016.

1

---
|   |
|---|
|   |  |
| 1 | I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Ally Auto Receivables Trust 2016-2 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”); |

|   |
|---|
|   |  |
| 2 | Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |

|   |
|---|
|   |  |
| 3 | Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports; |

|   |
|---|
|   |  |
| 4 | Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and |

|   |
|---|
|   |  |
| 5 | All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K. |

|                                                               |
|---------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                               |  |
| /s/ Ryan C. Farris                                            |   |
|                                                          |
| Ryan C. Farris                                                |
| President, Ally Auto Assets LLC, as Depositor                 |
| (Senior Officer in charge of securitization of the depositor) |
# C_2020313EN.01001601.xml

| 21.9.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 313/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.9.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 313/16

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof (Germany) lodged on 22 July 2020 — Finanzamt B v X-Beteiligungsgesellschaft mbH

(Case C-324/20)

(2020/C 313/19)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesfinanzhof

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Finanzamt B

Defendant: X-Beteiligungsgesellschaft mbH

Questions referred

| 1. | Does a service provided on a single occasion and therefore not in relation to a certain period of time give rise to successive statements of account or successive payments within the meaning of Article 64(1) of the VAT Directive (1) merely on the basis of an agreement to pay in instalments? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Does a service provided on a single occasion and therefore not in relation to a certain period of time give rise to successive statements of account or successive payments within the meaning of Article 64(1) of the VAT Directive (1) merely on the basis of an agreement to pay in instalments?

| 2. | Alternatively, if the first question is answered in the negative: Is non-payment within the meaning of Article 90(1) of the VAT Directive to be assumed if the taxable person, when providing his service, agrees that the service is to be paid for in five annual instalments and the national law relating to cases of subsequent payment provides for an adjustment by which the previous reduction in the taxable amount is cancelled again in accordance with that article? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Alternatively, if the first question is answered in the negative: Is non-payment within the meaning of Article 90(1) of the VAT Directive to be assumed if the taxable person, when providing his service, agrees that the service is to be paid for in five annual instalments and the national law relating to cases of subsequent payment provides for an adjustment by which the previous reduction in the taxable amount is cancelled again in accordance with that article?

---

(1)  OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1.

---
# C_2008118EN.01000801.xml

| 15.5.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 118/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.5.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 118/8

---

Latest publication of COM documents other than legislative proposals and legislative proposals adopted by the Commission

(2008/C 118/04)

OJ C 106, 26.4.2008

OJ C 106, 26.4.2008

History of previous publications:

OJ C 55, 28.2.2008

OJ C 9, 15.1.2008

OJ C 4, 9.1.2008

OJ C 246, 20.10.2007

OJ C 191, 17.8.2007

OJ C 181, 3.8.2007

---
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .

                               UGI UTILITIES INC.

        COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES - EXHIBIT 12.1

                             (THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                    Six
                                                   Months
                                                   Ended             Year Ended September 30,
                                                 March 31,   ----------------------------------------
                                                    2006       2005       2004       2003       2002
                                                 ---------   --------   --------   --------   -------
<S>                                              <C>         <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>
EARNINGS:
Earnings before income taxes                      $74,476    $ 84,953   $ 83,098   $100,212   $73,665
Interest expense                                   10,844      18,079     17,698     17,412    16,365
Amortization of debt discount and expense             112         247        233        244       287
Estimated interest component of rental expense        814       1,568      1,477      1,434     1,563
                                                  -------    --------   --------   --------   -------
                                                  $86,246    $104,847   $102,506   $119,302   $91,880
                                                  =======    ========   ========   ========   =======

FIXED CHARGES:
Interest expense                                  $10,844    $ 18,079   $ 17,698   $ 17,412   $16,365
Amortization of debt discount and expense             112         247        233        244       287
Allowance for funds used during
   construction (capitalized interest)                 50          22         11          7        19
Estimated interest component of rental expense        814       1,568      1,477      1,434     1,563
                                                  -------    --------   --------   --------   -------
                                                  $11,820    $ 19,916   $ 19,419   $ 19,097   $18,234
                                                  =======    ========   ========   ========   =======
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                   7.30        5.26       5.28       6.25      5.04
                                                  =======    ========   ========   ========   =======
</TABLE>
Resignation(Officer)


EXHIBIT
  10.04

SHOTGUN ENERGY CORPORATION

(the “Company”)

 

Officer and Director Resignation

I hereby resign as Director, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, effective immediately.

Dated:  August 7, 2008

/s/: Robert Klein

Robert Klein
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

ALLEN G. HOLMES,

Plaintiff,

 Case No. 2:12-cv-680

v. JUDGE GREGORY L. FROST

 Magistrate Judge Terence P. Kemp

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, 

Defendant.

ORDER

 This matter is before the Court for consideration of the Magistrate Judge’s June 17, 2013

Report and Recommendation. (ECF No. 26.) In that filing, the Magistrate Judge recommended

that the Court grant each party’s motion to remand (ECF Nos. 24, 25) so that an administrative

law judge can conduct a new hearing and a new credibility assessment and issue a new decision. 

(ECF No. 26, at Page ID # 412.) The Report and Recommendation also advised the parties that

the failure to object within fourteen days would “result in a waiver of the right to have the

district judge review the Report and Recommendation de novo, and also operates as a waiver of

the right to appeal the decision of the District Court adopting the Report and Recommendation.” 

(Id. at Page ID # 413.) 

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation and the motions. Noting that

no objections have been filed, that the time for filing such objections has expired, and that the

Magistrate Judge’s reasoning is correct, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation

(ECF No. 26), GRANTS the motions to remand (ECF No. 24, 25), and, pursuant to sentence

1

Case: 2:12-cv-00680-GLF-TPK Doc #: 27 Filed: 07/05/13 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), REMANDS this matter for further proceedings. On remand, the

further proceedings shall include, but need not be limited to, an administrative law judge

conducting a new hearing, making a new credibility assessment, and issuing a new decision. 

The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly and terminate this case on the docket records of the

United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, Eastern Division. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 /s/ Gregory L. Frost 

GREGORY L. FROST

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2

Case: 2:12-cv-00680-GLF-TPK Doc #: 27 Filed: 07/05/13 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>