alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
111298720 v1

May 15th, 2015

U. S. Department of Transportation

Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE

Washington, DC 20590

Re: Amendment to Exemption _____ issued pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA 

Reform Act and Part 11 of the Federal Aviation Regulations in Regulatory Docket 

No. FAA-2014- .

Dear Sir or Madam;

Snaproll Media was issued an Exemption numbered 11063 (hereinafter the Exemption)

for the purpose of conducting scripted, closed-set filming for the motion picture and television 

industry. Snaproll Media herby requests an amendment to the Exemption to allow an additional

type of unmanned aircraft system (UAS) that fully complies with the conditions of the 

Exemption. 

Snaproll Media wishes to operate a Freefly Cinestar 6, 8, DJI Phantom 1,2,3 and DJI 

Inspire under the same terms and conditions contained in the Exemption. Submitted to the 

below CC as a confidential document, is the Flight Operations and Procedures Manual (FOPM) 

for the additional UAS. All operations of the additional UAS will be in full compliance with the 

terms of the Exemption.

As this is an amendment to an existing exemption asking for only the addition of another 

type of unmanned aerial vehicle, Snaproll Media respectfully submits that good cause exists so 

that notice does not need to be published in the Federal Register for the requested amendment.

Please contact the undersigned should you have any question concerning this request 

for an amendment to the Exemption.

Sincerely yours, Spencer Valdez

cc:

James Williams

Robert Pappas

Jake Troutman
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 622 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 622

 Supporting the goals and ideals of a ``National Children and Families 
Day'', as established by the National Children's Museum, on the fourth 
                           Saturday of June.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            December 5, 2006

    Mr. Warner (for himself and Mr. Allen) submitted the following 
 resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Health, Education, 
                          Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 Supporting the goals and ideals of a ``National Children and Families 
Day'', as established by the National Children's Museum, on the fourth 
                           Saturday of June.

Whereas research shows that spending time together as a family is critical to 
        raising strong and resilient kids;
Whereas strong healthy families improve the quality of life and development of 
        children;
Whereas it is essential to celebrate and reflect upon the important role that 
        all families play in the lives of children and in the future of the 
        United States; and
Whereas the country's greatest natural resource is its children: Now, therefore, 
        be it
    Resolved, That the Senate supports the goals and ideals of a 
``National Children and Families Day'' on the fourth Saturday of June, 
as established by the National Children's Museum, to--
            (1) encourage adults to support, listen to, and encourage 
        children throughout the United States so that those children 
        may achieve their hopes and dreams;
            (2) reflect upon the important role that all families play 
        in the lives of children; and
            (3) recognize that strong, healthy families improve the 
        quality of life and development of children.
                                 <all>
```
No. 48719.

#### Protests 743132-G, etc., of Acierno Bros. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and the cited cases the following allowances were made by the court to compensate for the weight of the foreign substances on the outside of certain cheese: (1) 21⁄2 percent for cheese similar to that the subject of *Scaramelli*v. *United States*(9 Cust. Ct. 270, C. D. 706) and Abstract 42146; and (2) 1 percent for that similar to Reggiano cheese the subject of *Scaramelli*v. *United States, supra.*
# C_2016027EN.01002601.xml

| 25.1.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 27/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.1.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 27/26

---

Appeal brought on 20 November 2015 by Toshiba Corp. against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) delivered on 9 September 2015 in Case T-104/13: Toshiba Corp. v European Commission

(Case C-623/15 P)

(2016/C 027/30)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Toshiba Corp. (represented by: J. F. MacLennan, Solicitor, A. Schulz, Rechtsanwalt, J. Jourdan, avocat, A. Kadri, Solicitor)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission

Other party to the proceedings:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The appellant claims that the Court should:

| — | Set aside the Judgment of the General Court in Case T-104/13 insofar as it upheld the finding of the European Commission that Toshiba is jointly and severally liable for the conduct of MTPD; |
| --- | --- |

—

Set aside the Judgment of the General Court in Case T-104/13 insofar as it upheld the finding of the European Commission that Toshiba is jointly and severally liable for the conduct of MTPD;

| — | Annul the Decision of the European Commission in Case COMP/39.437 TV and Computer Monitor Tubes insofar as it found that Toshiba infringed Article 101 TFEU and held Toshiba jointly and severally liable for the conduct of MTPD; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the Decision of the European Commission in Case COMP/39.437 TV and Computer Monitor Tubes insofar as it found that Toshiba infringed Article 101 TFEU and held Toshiba jointly and severally liable for the conduct of MTPD;

| — | Order the European Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the European Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicants rely on a single plea in law:

The General Court misapplied the concept of undertaking by incorrectly classifying certain elements as indicating that Toshiba was in a position to, or did actually, exercise decisive influence over MTPD and by concluding that the sum of those elements was sufficient to support the conclusion that Toshiba did exercise such influence over MTPD.

---
# C_2015127EN.01000902.xml

| 20.4.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 127/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.4.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 127/9

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht München I (Germany) lodged on 19 January 2015 — Verband Sozialer Wettbewerb e.V. v Innova Vital GmbH

(Case C-19/15)

(2015/C 127/14)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Landgericht München I

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Verband Sozialer Wettbewerb e.V.

Applicant:

Defendant: Innova Vital GmbH

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Must Article 1(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 (1) be interpreted as meaning that the provisions of that regulation apply also to nutrition and health claims made in commercial communications in advertisements for foods to be delivered as such to the final consumer if the commercial communication or advertisement is addressed exclusively to the professional sector?

1

---

(1)  Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 December 2006 on nutrition and health claims made on foods; OJ 2006 L 404, p. 9.

1

---
III 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 318 

Designating November 27, 2005, as ‘‘Drive Safer Sunday’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 17, 2005 

Mr. CHAMBLISS (for himself and Mr. ISAKSON) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Designating November 27, 2005, as ‘‘Drive Safer Sunday’’. 

Whereas motor vehicle travel is the primary means of transportation in the United States; 

Whereas everyone on the roads and highways needs to drive 

more safely to reduce deaths and injuries resulting from 

motor vehicle accidents; 

Whereas the death of almost 43,000 people a year in more 

than 6 million highway crashes in America has been 

called an epidemic by Transportation Secretary Norman 

Mineta; 

Whereas according to the National Highway Transportation 

Safety Administration, wearing a seat belt saved 15,434 

lives in 2004; and 

Whereas the Sunday after Thanksgiving is the busiest highway traffic day of the year: Now, therefore, be it 
2 

•SRES 318 IS

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) encourages— 

3 (A) high schools, colleges, universities, ad4 ministrators, teachers, primary schools, and 

5 secondary schools to launch campus-wide edu6 cational campaigns to urge students to be care7 ful about safety when driving; 

8 (B) national trucking firms to alert their 

9 drivers to be especially focused on driving safely 

10 during the heaviest traffic day of the year, and 

11 to publicize the importance of the day using 

12 Citizen’s band (CB) radios and in truck stops 

13 across the Nation; 

14 (C) clergy to remind their members to 

15 travel safely when attending services and gath16 erings; 

17 (D) law enforcement personnel to remind 

18 drivers and passengers to drive particularly 

19 safely on the Sunday after Thanksgiving; and 

20 (E) everyone to use the Sunday after 

21 Thanksgiving as an opportunity to educate 

22 themselves about highway safety; and 

23 (2) designates November 27, 2005, as ‘‘Drive 

24 Safer Sunday’’. 

Æ
Th e Law Offic e o f Darrel l J . Green , LL C 77 0 S . Willo w Par

k Driv e Lehi , U T 8404 3 Telephone : (660 ) 624-218 1 Email : green.770@comcast.ne t

Jul y 23,201 5 VIA ELECTRONI C SUBMISSIO N Federal Docke tManagemen tWebsite U . S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n Docke t Management

System 1200 Ne w Jersey Ave. , S E Washington , D C 2059 0 Re : Respons e t o FA A Reques t fo r Informatio n Los t River Enterprises , LL C d/b/a

/ Los t Rive r Aeria l (Los t River ) Docket No . FAA-2015-165 9 Mr . Brend aRobeson : Thi s i s i n respons e to you r Reques t fo r Furthe r Informatio n directe d to Mr . Gregor y Phillip s o f Los t Rive r Enterprises , LL C d/b/a

/ Los t River Aeria l (Los t River ) date d Jul y 21 , 2015 . Mr . Gregor y Phillip s i s requestin g that yo u procee d withou t

aMotio n Picture an d Televisio n Operation s Manua

l (MPTOM ) a s Los t

Rive r i s no t requestin g authorit

y to operat

e i n aclosed-se

t filmin g environment . Than k you . Sincerely ,

Darrel l J . Green , J D Law Office o f

Darrel l J . Gree n Counse l fo r

Los t Rive r Enterprises , LL C d/b/a

/ Los t River Aeria l

cc : Mr . G . Phillip s
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, John C. Lawrence, President, and Chief Executive Officer of United States
Antimony Corporation (the "Company") do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to my knowledge:

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended
June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ John C. Lawrence                                    Date: August 13, 2008
-------------------------------------------------------      -------------------
John C. Lawrence, President and Chief Executive Officer
April 11 , 2013



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

JEREMY LEE GARZA , Appellant

NO. 14

- 11

- 00896

- CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

________________________________

This cause was heard on the transcript of the re cord of the court below. Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED , and that this decision be certified below for observance.
Each depositor insured to at least $250,000 per insured bank
 Advanced Search
 Home
				|
				Deposit Insurance
				|
				Consumer Protection
				|
				Industry Analysis
				|
				Regulations & Examinations
				|
				Asset Sales
				|
				News & Events
				|
				About FDIC
 Bank Find
							Are My Deposits Insured?
							Uninsured Investments
							The Deposit Insurance Fund
							International Deposit Insurance
 Consumer News & Information
							Loans & Mortgages
							Banking & Your Money
							Financial Education & Literacy
							Community Affairs
							Identity Theft & Fraud
							Consumer Financial Privacy
 Bank Data & Statistics
							Research & Analysis
							Failed Banks
 Bank Examinations
							Laws & Regulations
							Resources for Bank Officers & Directors
							FDIC*connect*
							Required Financial Reports
							Examiner Training Programs
 Loan Sales
							Real Estate Sales
							Financial Asset Sales
							Servicing Sales Announcements
							Other Asset Sales
							Historical Sales
 Press Releases
							Online Press Room
							Conferences & Events
							Financial Institution Letters
							Special Alerts
							Letters to the Editor/Opinion Editorials
							Speeches & Testimony
 Mission & Purpose
							Advisory Committees
							Careers with the FDIC
							Management Team
							Plans & Reports
							What We Can Do for You
							Diversity at the FDIC
 Home	 > Full Text SearchFull Text Search

	

	Advanced Search
Search TipsLast Updated 12/9/2004
	[email protected]
 Home
				|
				Contact Us
				|
				Search
				|
				Help
				|
				SiteMap
				|
				Forms
                	|
				En Español
 Website Policies
				|
				Privacy Policy
				|
				USA.gov
				|
				FDIC Office of Inspector General
 Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Service Center
				|
				FDIC Open Government Webpage	|
                	No  FEAR Act Data
# C_2016326EN.01000702.xml

| 5.9.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.9.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/7

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesverwaltungsgericht Oberösterreich (Austria) lodged on 30 November 2015 — Susanne Sokoll-Seebacher and Manfred Naderhirn

(Case C-634/15)

(2016/C 326/12)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Landesverwaltungsgericht Oberösterreich

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Susanne Sokoll-Seebacher, Manfred Naderhirn

Applicants:

Intervening parties: Agnes Hemetsberger, Mag. Jungwirth und Mag. Fabian OHG and Others

Intervening parties:

By the order of 30 June 2016, the Court (Eighth Chamber) orders:

The judgment of 13 February 2014 in Sokoll-Seebacher (C-367/12, EU:C:2014:68) must be read as meaning that the criterion relating to a strict limit on the number of ‘persons who continue to be served’, laid down by the national legislation at issue in the main proceedings, is not to be applied, for the purposes of determining the existence of a need to open a new pharmacy, in a general manner, in every specific situation which will be the subject of an assessment.

Sokoll-Seebacher

---
# C_2016260EN.01003702.xml

| 18.7.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 260/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.7.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 260/37

---

Order of the President of the Court of 17 March 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof — Austria) — Hans-Peter Ofenböck, in the presence of: Unabhängiger Verwaltungssenat im Land Niederösterreich

(Case C-565/15) (1)

1

(2016/C 260/46)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 38, 1.2.2016.

1

---
Before the Second Division,

April 27, 1944

No. 49383.

#### Protests 581188-G, etc., of M. Stern (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

The record showed that certain of the items in question consisted of 8-bu. hats similar in all material respects to those involved in *Caradine*v. *United States*(9 Cust. Ct. 69, C. D. 664) which record.was admitted in evidence herein. In accordance therewith the claim at only 25 percent ad valorem was sustained as to certain of the merchandise.
Case No. 14,604.

#### UNITED STATES v. BOOK.

[2 Cranch. C. C. 294.] 1

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

April Term. 1822.

Criminal Law — Former Acquittal — Forgeri— Draft.

1. Ad acquittal upon an indictment for forging an order with intent to defraud John Lang, is no bar to an indictment for forging the same order with intent to defraud William Lang.

2. An order in these words: “Sir: Please let the bearer have one pair boots. Yours &e., Levin Stewart,” is a draft for the delivery of goods, within the act of Maryland of 1799. c. 75, 8 2.

[Cited in Garmire v. State, 104 Ind. 443. 4 N. ' E. 55: Long i. Straus, 107 Ind. 103, 6 N. E. 123. 7 N. E. 76(5.]

Indictment for forging and uttering the following order: “Sir: Please let the bearer have one pair pair boots. Yours Ac.. Levin Stewart. Mr. Lang. Geo'town. December 31, 1821.” — with intent to defraud one William Lang.

The prisoner IBook, alias Bush] had been indicted before.' at tbe present term, for forging and uttering the same order with intent to defraud one John Lang: but it appearing upon the trial that the name of the person intended to be defrauded was William, and not John, and an exception having been taken by tbe prisoners counsel to tbe variance, be was acquitted on that ground. Upon the present indictment it was agreed by the prisoner’s counsel and the attorney for the United States, that the prisoner should have the benefit of the plea of autrefois acquit, upon the plea of not guilty, In the same manner as if he had pleaded it specially.

THE COURT

decided that the acquittal upon the former indictment was not a bar to the present; being of opinion that the exception taken to the former indictment was fatal. See 1 Chit. Or. I aw, 455.

The prisoner’s counsel also contended that the instrument forged was not an order within the English decisions upon the English-statute of 7 Geo. II. c. 22; Mitchell’s Case, cited in 2 East, P. C. 936, and William’s Case. 1 Leach, 114; and Ellor’s Case. Id. 323.

But THE COURT said, that upon that point he might move in- afres't of judgment if the prisoner should be convicted. See U. S. v. Bates [Case No. 14,542] in this court, June term, 1810, upon the act of Maryland of 1799, c. 75. § 2. in which the court decided that the words “draft for the payment of money or delivery of goods,” included such an order as the present.

Verdict, “Guilty.”

Motion in arrest of judgment overruled.
EXHIBIT 32

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Consumers Financial
Corporation (the "Company") for the period ended September 30, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Donald J. Hommel, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or
            15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

Date  December 29, 2003                 By /s/ Donald J. Hommel
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Donald J. Hommel
                                          Chief Executive Officer and Chief
                                          Financial Officer

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Consumers Financial Corporation and will be retained by Consumers
Financial Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.


Consumers Financial Corporation                                          Page 27
Form 10-Q                                                     September 30, 2003
# C_2016191EN.01005101.xml

| 30.5.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 191/51 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.5.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 191/51

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (3rd Chamber) of 12 April 2016 — Beiner v Commission

(Case F-135/15) (1)

1

((Civil service - Competition - Eligibility conditions - Professional experience - Selection board’s decision not to allow the applicant to sit the competition - Manifest error of assessment))

(2016/C 191/73)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Laurent Beiner (Knutange, France) (represented by: B. Sahki, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Gattinara and F. Simonetti, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Annulment of the decision of the selection board in Competition EPSO/AST/130/14 not to admit the applicant to the assessment stage, on the ground that he did not have the required level of studies and professional experience of a minimum of six years related to the nature of the work.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.

| 2. | Mr Laurent Beiner shall bear his own costs and is ordered to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Mr Laurent Beiner shall bear his own costs and is ordered to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 7 of 11/01/2016, p. 37.

1

---