alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

Rebecca Legett

From: Rebecca Legett

Sent: Monday, December 22, 2008 4:37 PM

To: charles.llenza@ee.doe.gov

Cc: Aris Marantan

Subject: ECM Motor Manufacturers for Walk-in coolers and freezers

Charlie, 

There are currently at least 3 manufacturers of ECM motors that could be used as evaporator fan motors for a walk-in. 

The details are below, and I have also attached more information. 

Rebecca Legett 

Navigant Consulting, Inc. 

Office 202-481-8471 

rebecca.legett@navigantconsulting.com

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

Parent company name: GE 

Motors subsidiary: Regal-Beloit 

(If applicable) 

Contact name: N/A 

Contact position: N/A 

Motor model: ICE 59 

Attachment: ICE59Release.pdf 

Is this an Electronically Commutated Motor (Brushless DC Motor)? 

Yes. 

Is this motor under 1 hp and less than 460 V? 

Yes; this motor is 1/15 hp and uses line voltage (nominally 115 V). 

Could this motor be used as an evaporator fan motor in a walk-in cooler or freezer? 

Yes. 

Is the motor manufactured by this company? 

Yes. 
2

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

Parent company name: Minebea 

Motors subsidiary: NMB Tech 

(If applicable) 

Contact name: Irvine Sloan 

Contact position: Program Manager 

Motor model(s): BLDC40, BLDC65 

Attachment(s): BLDC_motor_details.pdf, BLDC40SG.pdf 

Is this an Electronically Commutated Motor (Brushless DC Motor)? 

Yes. 

Is this motor under 1 hp and less than 460 V? 

Yes; these motors range from 0.025 to 0.26 hp and 12 to 48 V supply voltage. 

Could this motor be used as an evaporator fan motor in a walk-in cooler or freezer? 

Yes. 

Is the motor manufactured by this company? 

Yes. 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

Parent company name: Ametek 

Motors subsidiary: Pittman 

(If applicable) 

Contact name: Lou Tecsi 

Contact position: Engineering Department 

Motor model(s): 2.5” Series, 3.55” Series, 5.25” Series 

Attachment(s): 2%2e5 BLDC Motor[1].pdf, 3%2e55 BLDC Motor[1].pdf, 5%2e25 BLDC Motor[1].pdf 

Is this an Electronically Commutated Motor (Brushless DC Motor)? 

Yes. 

Is this motor under 1 hp and less than 460 V? 

Yes; these motors range from 0.068 to 0.59 hp and from 24 to 27.6 V supply voltage. 

Could this motor be used as an evaporator fan motor in a walk-in cooler or freezer? 

Yes. 

Is the motor manufactured by this company? 

Yes. 

ECM_motors.doc 5%2e25 BLDC 

Motor[1].pdf

3%2e55 BLDC 

Motor[1].pdf

2%2e5 BLDC 

Motor[1].pdf

BLDC_motor_details

.pdf

ICE59Release.pdf BLDC40SG.pdf
Exhibit
4.1


 


DESCRIPTION
OF SECURITIES OF INCEPTION MINING INC.


 


The
following is a summary of the material terms of the Inception Mining Inc.’s common and preferred stock, which is based upon, and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to, applicable law and Inception Mining’s Articles of Incorporation, as amended (the
“Inception Mining Articles of Incorporation”). For a complete description of the terms of Inception Mining’s common
and preferred stock, refer to the Inception Mining Inc.’s Articles of Incorporation, as amended, which are included as exhibits
to this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


 


Classes
of Stock


 


Inception
Mining Inc. has two classes of stock: common stock and preferred stock, with 510,000,000 shares of capital stock authorized consisting
of (i) 500,000,000 shares of common stock, $0.00001 par value, and (ii) 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, $0.00001 par value.


 


On
August 31, 2016, fifty-one shares of preferred stock were designated as Series A with voting rights equal to (x) 0.019607 multiplied
by the total issued and outstanding shares of Common Stock eligible to vote at the time of the respective vote (the “Numerator”),
divided by (y) 0.49, minus (x) the Numerator. They have no rights of conversion.


 


There
are 186,511,276 shares of our common stock were issued, issuable and outstanding as of April 15, 2022, and 51 shares of
preferred stock issued and outstanding as of April 15, 2022.
# C_2017382EN.01001201.xml

| 13.11.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 382/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.11.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 382/12

---

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 12 September 2017 — Republic of Austria v Federal Republic of Germany

(Case C-648/15) (1)

1

((Article 273 TFEU - Dispute between Member States submitted to the Court under a special agreement between the parties - Taxation - Bilateral convention for the avoidance of double taxation - Taxation of interest from financial instruments - Definition of ‘debt-claims with participation in profits’))

(2017/C 382/13)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Republic of Austria (represented by: C. Pesendorfer, F. Koppensteiner and H. Jirousek, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Federal Republic of Germany (represented by: T. Henze and J. Möller, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

| 1. | The concept of ‘debt-claims with participation in profits’ referred to in Article 11(2) of the Abkommen zwischen der Republik Österreich und der Bundesrepublik Deutschland zur Vermeidung der Doppelbesteuerung auf dem Gebiet der Steuern vom Einkommen und vom Vermögen (Convention between the Republic of Austria and the Federal Republic of Germany for the avoidance of double taxation with respect to taxes on income and capital) of 24 August 2000 must be interpreted as excluding certificates such as those at issue in the present case. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The concept of ‘debt-claims with participation in profits’ referred to in Article 11(2) of the Abkommen zwischen der Republik Österreich und der Bundesrepublik Deutschland zur Vermeidung der Doppelbesteuerung auf dem Gebiet der Steuern vom Einkommen und vom Vermögen (Convention between the Republic of Austria and the Federal Republic of Germany for the avoidance of double taxation with respect to taxes on income and capital) of 24 August 2000 must be interpreted as excluding certificates such as those at issue in the present case.

| 2. | The Federal Republic of Germany is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The Federal Republic of Germany is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 38, 1.2.2016.

1

---
#### Gloria Glove Co., Inc. *v.*United States

No. 7389.

Invoice dated Stoke under Ham, Somerset, England, May 5, 1942.

Certified May 16, 1942.

Entered at New York, N. Y., June 30, 1942.

Entry No. 19624.

(Decided September 26, 1947)

Plaintiff not represented by counsel.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Mollison, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
### RE: Can we push the 11:30 mtg on NO2 to noon? Lydia Wegman to: King, Heidi R. 01/20/2010 11:21 AM Cc: Charlotte Bertrand, dmancini Bcc: Tricia Crabtree At this point we have nothing to discuss on the number of monitors. Can you confirm to me that you have no additional comments on the entire rulemaking package and the RIA and that the comment response I sent you last Friday takes care of all the interagency comments? Thanks. "King, Heidi R." 01/20/2010 11:05:06 AM EPA requested this time. You wrote yesterday t... From: "King, Heidi R." <Heidi

_ R.

_ King@omb.eop.gov> To: Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA Cc: Charlotte Bertrand/DC/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 01/20/2010 11:05 AM Subject: RE: Can we push the 11:30 mtg on NO2 to noon?

EPA requested this time. You wrote yesterday that EPA was concerned with the number of monitors and wanted to discuss this further, but if you have nothing to discuss then we don't need to meet today. Thanks, heidi -----Original Message----- From: Wegman.Lydia@epamail.epa.gov [mailto:Wegman.Lydia@epamail.epa.gov] Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2010 10:20 AM To: King, Heidi R. Cc: Bertrand.Charlotte@epamail.epa.gov Subject: RE: Can we push the 11:30 mtg on NO2 to noon? Do we have issues to discuss other than the numbers of monitors? That is an issue we're not ready to discuss at noon. Please let me know. Thanks.
From: "King, Heidi R." <Heidi_R._ King@omb.eop.gov> To: Charlotte Bertrand/DC/USEPA/US@EPA Cc: Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 01/20/2010 10:05 AM Subject: RE: Can we push the 11:30 mtg on NO2 to noon?

Sure – Lydia, is noon ok with you? From: Bertrand.Charlotte@epamail.epa.gov [mailto:Bertrand.Charlotte@epamail

. e pa . g ov ] Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2010 10:05 AM To: King, Heidi R. Cc: Wegman.Lydia@epamail.epa.gov Subject: Re: Can we push the 11:30 mtg on NO2 to noon? My calendar is free, will you patch us in?

From: "King, Heidi R." <Heidi_R._King @omb.eop.gov> To: Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Charlotte Bertrand/DC/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 01/20/2010 09:57 AM Subjec Can we push the 11:30 mtg on NO2 to noon? t:

Looks like my 11am will run late. Would it be possible to talk at noon instead of 11:30? Thanks, heidi
National Educational Forum on the WoodHeater NSPSCurrent & Emerging TechnologiesJohn Crouch, HPBANovember 8, 2012Common Goal - Reduce Woodsmoke•Regulatory Agency's - Bounded byTechnological Feasibility & CostEffectiveness•Industry - Bounded by Consumerswillingness to Buy!–Especially true for replacements ofexisting stoves–Consumers need a value propositionWhere Have We Come From?15 – 20 Million oldStoves & Inserts in useby Mid -1980’s- 2ndOil Embargotaught American’s to“Be Prepared”- Energy prices spikesof last 15 yearshavn’t changed theirmindsIndustry Innovations - last 30 years•Catalytic Woodstoves (pre 1980)•Large Non-Catalytic Woodstoves•Pellet Stoves (~mid ‘80s)•Self-Igniting pellet stoves 1989•Multi-fuel stoves, Gas-Wood•Down-draft Hydronic Heaters•Electric Quick Start•Mechanical TimersInnovations From Other Countries•Early New Zealand Non-Cats–Bosca - 1984•Masonry Heaters–TuliKivi•Pellet Boilers–H.S. Tarm~ early l990’sBut - Not all Innovations Work!•Woodstove retrofits –Warranties!•Many early non-cat and cat designs–(often too restrictive exhaust)•Many poorly designed bypasses - both catand non-cat•First woodstove with microprocessor–Colorado 1984-86•Retrofit pellet units - worked, just not worththe cost•Down Draft Gasifier Boilers – Essex – l984Future Innovations?• By Definition – True Innovations are:– Unanticipated– Unique– Fool Proof & Fail Safe– Perform in a wide variety of homes– Have long lead times– Satisfy Consumers– Do not have excessive warranty claims
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 8, 2018

No. 04

- 17

- 00640

- CR

William Boyd PORTER

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 186th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016CR4455

Honorable Jefferson Moore, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

The Appellant ’ s Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply Brief is GRANTED. The

appellant ’ s reply brief is due August 17, 2018.

_________________________________ Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 8th day of August, 2018

.

___________________________________ K eith E. H ottle

Clerk of Court
----

            DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE         

No 125/2005

of 30 September 2005         

amending Annex XXI (Statistics) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

Point 16a (Commission Regulation (EC) No 1917/2000) of Annex XXI to the Agreement shall be amended as follow:

Article 2

The text of Regulation (EC) No 179/2005 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 1 October 2005, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 30 September 2005.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

HSH Prinz Nikolaus von LIECHTENSTEIN            

----

(1)OJ L 268, 13.10.2005, p. 21.

(2)OJ L 30, 3.2.2005, p. 6.

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

----
----

|   | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;  and |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of UAL      Corporation. |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/      Glenn F. Tilton          |   |
|-----------------------------------|--------|
| Glenn      F. Tilton              |   |
| Chairman, President and |   |
| Chief      Executive Officer      |   |
|                              |   |
|                              |   |
| /s/      Kathryn A. Mikells       |   |
| Kathryn      A. Mikells           |   |
| Executive      Vice President and |   |
| Chief      Financial Officer      |   |

----
# C_2017112EN.01000302.xml

| 10.4.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 112/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.4.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 112/3

---

Opinion of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 14 February 2017 — European Commission

(Opinion 3/15) (1)

1

((Opinion pursuant to Article 218(11) TFEU - Marrakesh Treaty to Facilitate Access to Published Works for Persons who are Blind, Visually Impaired or Otherwise Print Disabled - Article 3 TFEU - Exclusive external competence of the European Union - Article 207 TFEU - Common commercial policy - Commercial aspects of intellectual property - International agreement that may affect common rules or alter their scope - Directive 2001/29/EC - Article 5(3)(b) and (4) - Exceptions and limitations for the benefit of people with a disability.))

(2017/C 112/04)

Language of the case: all the official languages

Requested by

Requested by

European Commission (represented by: B. Hartmann, F. Castillo de la Torre and J. Samnadda, agents)

Operative part

Operative part

The conclusion of the Marrakesh Treaty to Facilitate Access to Published Works for Persons Who Are Blind, Visually Impaired or Otherwise Print Disabled falls within the exclusive competence of the European Union.

---

(1)  OJ C 311, 21.9.2015.

1

---
III 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 416 

Recognizing the victims of Hurricane Rita 6 months after the disaster, commending the resiliency of the people of Southwest Louisiana and Southeast Texas, and committing to stand by them in their relief and rebuilding efforts. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 31, 2006 

Mr. VITTER (for himself, Mr. CORNYN, Mrs. HUTCHISON, and Ms. LANDRIEU) 

submitted the following resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the victims of Hurricane Rita 6 months after 

the disaster, commending the resiliency of the people 

of Southwest Louisiana and Southeast Texas, and committing to stand by them in their relief and rebuilding 

efforts. 

Whereas, on September 24, 2005, Hurricane Rita reached 

landfall causing extensive and significant damage along 

the Louisiana and extreme southeastern Texas coasts; 

Whereas Hurricane Rita was named the fourth most intense 

Atlantic Hurricane ever recorded and the most intense 

tropical cyclone observed in the Gulf of Mexico; 

Whereas the storm caused the loss of power in 700,000 

homes in the State of Louisiana; 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 416 ATS

Whereas the total damage is estimated at $9,400,000,000, 

making Hurricane Rita the ninth-costliest storm in the 

history of the United States; 

Whereas the human suffering continues for thousands of people who have lost loved ones, homes, and livelihoods; 

Whereas immediate humanitarian aid is still critically needed 

in many of the areas affected by Hurricane Rita; 

Whereas Federal, State, and local first responders, the National Guard, and many ordinary citizens have risked 

their lives to save others; 

Whereas the American Red Cross, the Salvation Army, local 

religious organizations, and other volunteer organizations 

and charities continue to supply victims with necessities; 

Whereas the State of Texas and numerous other States have 

welcomed thousands of victims from Louisiana and continue to provide them with aid and comfort; and 

Whereas thousands of volunteers and government employees 

from across the Nation have committed time and resources to help with recovery efforts: Now, therefore, be 

it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) expresses the condolences of the Nation to 

3 the victims of Hurricane Rita; 

4 (2) recognizes the 6-month anniversary of the 

5 disaster; 

6 (3) commends the resiliency and courage of the 

7 people of the States of Louisiana and Texas; and 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
3 

•SRES 416 ATS

1 (4) commits to providing the necessary re2 sources and to standing by the people of the States 

3 of Louisiana and Texas in the relief, recovery, and 

4 rebuilding efforts in the areas impacted by Hurri5 cane Rita. 

Æ 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
Exhibit 15


August 8, 2001


Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549


Commissioners:

We are aware that our report dated August 8, 2001 on our
reviews of interim financial information of UniSource Energy
Corporation (the Company) and Tucson Electric Power Company
(TEP) as of and for the period ended June 30, 2001 and included
in the Company's and TEP's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for
the quarter then ended is incorporated by reference in the
Company's Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-43765,
333-43767, 333-43769, 333-53309, 333-53333 and 333-53337), on
Form S-3 (Nos. 333-31043 and 333-93769), and on Form S-4 (No.
333-60809) and in TEP's Amendment No. 3 to the Registration
Statement on Form S-4 (No. 333-65143).

Very truly yours,



PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
```

[Senate Report 110-259]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

_______________________________________________________________________

        NOTICE: In lieu of a star print, errata are printed to indicate 
            corrections to the original report.
_______________________________________________________________________

                                                       Calendar No. 563
110th Congress                                                   Report
                                 SENATE
 2d Session                                                     110-259

======================================================================

 
                                 ERRATA

                                _______
                                

                January 24, 2008.--Ordered to be printed

                                _______
                                

Mr. Leahy, from the Committee on the Judiciary, submitted the following

                              R E P O R T

                             together with

                     ADDITIONAL AND MINORITY VIEWS

                         [To accompany S. 1145]

                               CORRECTION

    On page 74, the heading was incorrectly printed. The name 
of Senator Specter should be stricken from the heading listing 
senators with ``Minority Views''.

                                  

```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000101295
<NAME> UNITED-GUARDIAN, INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                       1,973,265
<SECURITIES>                                    81,750
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,528,314
<ALLOWANCES>                                    52,818
<INVENTORY>                                  1,089,657
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,981,628
<PP&E>                                       4,580,853
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,104,211
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,986,180
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          589,341
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       488,314
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,330,874
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,986,180
<SALES>                                      2,413,975
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,413,975
<CGS>                                        1,312,765
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,312,765
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  73
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                636,936
<INCOME-TAX>                                   236,800
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            400,136
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   400,136
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .08
        

</TABLE>
# Official Journal L 22/2015

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 22 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5828 January 2015 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 22

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5828 January 2015

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Council Regulation (EU) 2015/104 of 19 January 2015 fixing for 2015 the fishing opportunities for certain fish stocks and groups of fish stocks, applicable in Union waters and, for Union vessels, in certain non-Union waters, amending Regulation (EU) No 43/2014 and repealing Regulation (EU) No 779/2014 | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Council Regulation (EU) 2015/104 of 19 January 2015 fixing for 2015 the fishing opportunities for certain fish stocks and groups of fish stocks, applicable in Union waters and, for Union vessels, in certain non-Union waters, amending Regulation (EU) No 43/2014 and repealing Regulation (EU) No 779/2014

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.