alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 634 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 634

Honoring the life and achievements of Tom Carr, Congressional Research 
  Service Analyst, and extending the condolences of the Senate on the 
                         occasion of his death.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             December 9 (legislative day, December 8), 2006

 Mr. Stevens submitted the following resolution; which was considered 
                             and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Honoring the life and achievements of Tom Carr, Congressional Research 
  Service Analyst, and extending the condolences of the Senate on the 
                         occasion of his death.

Whereas Tom Carr served Congress with distinction for 31 years at the Library of 
        Congress as an analyst for the Congressional Research Service;
Whereas Mr. Carr held a bachelor's degree in history from Catholic University in 
        Washington, D.C., and a master's degree in information systems from 
        Strayer University in Fredericksburg, Virginia;
Whereas Mr. Carr was born in Jacksonville, Illinois, and grew up in Atlanta, 
        Georgia;
Whereas Mr. Carr was an expert on congressional committees, House and Senate 
        floor procedure, and congressionally created commissions;
Whereas Mr. Carr was an enthusiastic teacher of congressional procedure to 
        staff, helping them to do their jobs better;
Whereas Mr. Carr was an accomplished and entertaining public speaker who founded 
        the Library of Congress chapter of the Toastmasters and was president of 
        the Capitol Hill Toastmasters;
Whereas Mr. Carr worked tirelessly and cheerfully in service to Congress and set 
        a high example for his colleagues;
Whereas Mr. Carr was distinguished for the generous enthusiasm with which he met 
        the needs of colleagues and clients alike, as well as for his persistent 
        and expansive good humor and wit; and
Whereas Mr. Carr faithfully discharged his duties and responsibilities in a wide 
        variety of demanding positions in public life with honesty, integrity, 
        loyalty, and humility: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) honors the life and achievements of Congressional 
        Research Service Analyst Tom Carr;
            (2) expresses profound sorrow upon the occasion of Mr. 
        Carr's death and extends heartful condolences to those who 
        survive him: his wife Mary (Mimi), his sons Thomas and John, 
        his mother Carswella, and his 9 brothers and sisters; and
            (3) expresses its appreciation and respect for Mr. Carr's 
        exemplary record as an analyst for Congress.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-40951

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

NOE FERMIN-SANCHEZ,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:13-CR-604-1

Before WIENER, OWEN, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Noe FerminSanchez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance 

with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 

F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Fermin-Sanchez has not filed a response. We have 

reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected 

therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 21, 2014

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 

 Case: 13-40951 Document: 00512602974 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/21/2014
No. 13-40951

nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave 

to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities 

herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

2

 Case: 13-40951 Document: 00512602974 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/21/2014
# C_2017249EN.01000601.xml

| 31.7.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 249/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.7.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 249/6

---

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 8 June 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank van eerste aanleg, West-Vlaanderen, afdeling Brugge — Belgium) — Maria Eugenia Van der Weegen, Miguel Juan Van der Weegen, Anna Pot, acting as successors in title to Johannes Van der Weegen, deceased, Anna Pot v Belgische Staat

(Case C-580/15) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 56 TFEU - Article 36 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area - Tax legislation - Income tax - Tax exemption reserved to interest payments by banks complying with certain statutory conditions - Indirect discrimination - Banks established in Belgium and banks established in another Member State))

(2017/C 249/08)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Rechtbank van eerste aanleg, West-Vlaanderen, afdeling Brugge

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Maria Eugenia Van der Weegen, Miguel Juan Van der Weegen, Anna Pot, acting as successors in title to Johannes Van der Weegen, deceased, Anna Pot

Defendant: Belgische Staat

Operative part of the judgment

Article 56 TFEU and Article 36 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area of 2 May 1992 must be interpreted as precluding national legislation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which provides for a national tax exemption system, to the extent that that system, although applicable without distinction to income from savings deposits held with banking service providers established in Belgium or in another Member State of the European Economic Area, imposes conditions for access to the Belgian banking market on service providers established in other Member States, this being a matter for the referring court to verify.

---

(1)  
  OJ C 38, 1.2.2016.

---
Exhibit 4.23
EXECUTION VERSION
Letter of Undertaking
To: Alibaba (China) Technology Co., Ltd. (阿里巴巴(中国)网络技术有限公司) (“You or Your Company”)
From: Zhejiang BEST Technology Co., Ltd. (浙江百世技术有限公司) (“We or Our Company”)
Date: August 19, 2021
WHEREAS (1) Your Company,  as a Lender, executed with BEST Logistics Technology (China) Co., Ltd., as a Borrower (“Borrower”), a Facility Agreement on August 19, 2021 under which the Lender shall provide a loan of RMB600,000,000 for the Borrower (“Facility Agreement”), and (2) as a condition precedent under the Facility Agreement, we shall make undertakings hereunder. Therefore, we hereby issue this Letter of Undertaking to you, and undertake as follows:
	1.
	We shall ensure that any cash considerations (net of any tax) received by Our Company or other members in our Group through selling our or their shares in BEST Express (the entities listed in Schedule I to the Facility Agreement) (“Consideration for Sale of BEST Express”) shall be first used to pay any debt of the Borrower under the Facility Agreement before the Borrower’s debts thereunder are discharged irrevocably in full;


	2.
	Before the Borrower’s debts are discharged irrevocably in full, we shall ensure that Our Company and other members in our Group shall not use the Consideration for Sale of BEST Express for any purpose not specified in paragraph 1 above without prior written consent of Your Company.


This Letter of Undertaking shall not constitute any warranty or guaranty made to you.
This Letter of Undertaking shall come into effect on the effective date hereof when authorized signatory of the Company sign hereon and affix our company seal hereto. This Letter of Undertaking shall not be canceled or amended without written approvals of the Parties.
Your Company shall be entitled to claim against us for any financial losses you sustain due to our violation of undertakings hereunder, including direct losses and indirect losses.
We acknowledge that this Letter of Undertaking shall constitute a Finance Document as defined in the Facility Agreement, and that breach hereof shall constitute an event of default thereunder.
​



Unless otherwise agreed herein or the context otherwise indicates, any term used herein shall have the same meaning as that defined or incorporated by reference in the Facility Agreement.
​
This Letter of Undertaking shall be governed by and construed in accordance with PRC laws. Any dispute arising out of or in connection with this Agreement shall be submitted to the court with jurisdiction in the place of your registered address.
​
[The remainder of this page is intentionally left blank]
​
​



[Signature Page to the Letter of Undertaking]
​
Undertaking made by
​
Zhejiang BEST Technology Co., Ltd. (浙江百世技术有限公司) (seal)
​
	By:
	/s/ Shao-Ning Johnny Chou
	​
	​



​
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 48 (Tuesday, March 12, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 15680]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-05603]

========================================================================
Notices
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules 
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings 
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, 
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency 
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents 
appearing in this section.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 12, 2013 / 
Notices

[[Page 15680]]

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Agricultural Research Service

Notice of Intent To Grant Exclusive License

AGENCY: Agricultural Research Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of intent.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. Department of 
Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, intends to grant to VHN 
Enterprises, LLC of San Francisco, California, an exclusive license to 
U.S. Patent No. 7,858,125, ``MULTI-COMPONENT BIOCIDE COMPOSITION FOR 
WOOD PROTECTION'', issued on December 28, 2010.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before April 11, 2013.

ADDRESSES: Send comments to: USDA, ARS, Office of Technology Transfer, 
5601 Sunnyside Avenue, Rm. 4-1174, Beltsville, Maryland 20705-5131.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: June Blalock of the Office of 
Technology Transfer at the Beltsville address given above; telephone: 
301-504-5989.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Government's patent rights in 
this invention are assigned to the United States of America, as 
represented by the Secretary of Agriculture. It is in the public 
interest to so license this invention as VHN Enterprises, LLC of San 
Francisco, California has submitted a complete and sufficient 
application for a license. The prospective exclusive license will be 
royalty-bearing and will comply with the terms and conditions of 35 
U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 404.7. The prospective exclusive license may be 
granted unless, within thirty (30) days from the date of this published 
Notice, the Agricultural Research Service receives written evidence and 
argument which establishes that the grant of the license would not be 
consistent with the requirements of 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 404.7.

Robert Griesbach,
Deputy Assistant Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2013-05603 Filed 3-11-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-03-P
```
David R. Spivey Request for P a rt 333 Exemption

Exhibit 2

– Q5 00 Typhoon UA Specifications
# Official Journal C 272/2016

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 272 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5926 July 2016 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 272

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5926 July 2016

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2016/C 272/01 | Commission Notice — The ‘Blue Guide’ on the implementation of EU products rules 2016 (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2016/C 272/01

Commission Notice — The ‘Blue Guide’ on the implementation of EU products rules 2016 (
  1
  )

1

1

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
.*AO 450 (Rev. 5/85) Judgment in a Civil Case

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

United States of America JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE

vs. Case No. 2:11-cv-151

 

 

 Magistrate Judge King

Robert Ridenour, 

 

[] Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues have been

tried and the jury has rendered its verdict.

[] Decision by Court. This action came to trial or hearing before the Court. The issues have been

tried or heard and a decision has been rendered.

[X] Decision by Court. This action was decided by the Court without a trial or hearing.

IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that pursuant to the Opinion and 

Order filed on December 5, 2011 granting motion for default

judgment. Judgment entered in favor of plaintiff and against defendant.

 

Date: December 5, 2011 James Bonini, Clerk

By: _s/Rashan Spraggins__________

 Rashan Spraggins , Deputy Clerk

Case: 2:11-cv-00151-NMK Doc #: 26 Filed: 12/05/11 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
# C_2015245EN.01000502.xml

| 27.7.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 245/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.7.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 245/5

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Commissione Tributaria Provinciale di Torino (Italy) lodged on 28 April 2015 — Véronique Baudinet and Others v Agenzia delle Entrate — Direzione Provinciale I di Torino

(Case C-194/15)

(2015/C 245/07)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Referring court

Commissione Tributaria Provinciale di Torino

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Véronique Baudinet, Adrien Boyer, Pauline Boyer, Edouard Boyer

Applicants:

Defendant: Agenzia delle Entrate — Direzione Provinciale I di Torino

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Do Articles 63 and 65 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union preclude legislation of a Member State under which, when a resident of that State, a shareholder in a company established in another Member State, receives dividends taxed in both States, that double taxation is not remedied by the grant in the State of residence of a tax credit at least equal to the amount of tax paid in the State of the distributing company?

---
Exhibit 99.2

                                  CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
           AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, James H. Perry, as Chief Financial Officer of United Industrial Corporation
(the "Company") certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

         (1) the accompanying Form 10-Q report for the period ended September
         30, 2002 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the
         "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.



Date:  November 14, 2002                            /s/ James H. Perry
                                                    ----------------------------
                                                    James H. Perry
                                                    Chief Financial Officer
                                                    of the Company
### Request for Information Will iam R. Nobles dba Aerial Technologies LLC (FAA-2015- 4238) 9-AWA-AVS-333Exemptions (FAA) Dear Mr. Nobles: This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA − 2015 − 4238). This information is necessary for the Fede ral Aviation Administrati on (FAA) to process your p etition. z Describe the aircraft make(s), model(s), and type(s)(i.e., fixed - wing, rotorcraft, lighter - than - air) for the proposed UAS operation. The description(s) should incl ude the maximum weight (including payload). This information can be located in the aircraft manual(s).

z Provide a copy of the Motion Picture and Television Op erations Manual (MPTOM) wh ich is required by Order 8900.1, Volume 3, Chapter 8, Section 1. If you wish for us to proceed without this manual and remove closedset filming from your proposed operation please inform of us of your inte ntion by the requested response date listed below. Please submit the additional informati on (non-proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov . Once your information has been submitted, plea se also send a copy of the requested information (and any proprietary information), as well as your comm ent tracking number from regulations.gov via e-mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov. I f you want us to process your request any further, we mu st receive the information de scribed above by January 6, 2016. If we do not receive the information, we willclose the docket without notifying you further. If you have any questions, please feelfree to contact me at (202) 267-2999. FAA Office of Rulemaking Sent : Wednesda y, December 23 , 2015 7:31 AM To: teamnobles@icloud.com
# C_2015398EN.01002402.xml

| 30.11.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 398/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.11.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 398/24

---

Order of the President of the Court of 8 July 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Hannover — Germany) — Alexandra Stück v Swiss International Air Lines AG

(Case C-3/15) (1)

1

(2015/C 398/33)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 118, 13.4.2015.

1

---
# C_2015294EN.01003901.xml

| 7.9.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 294/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.9.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 294/39

---

Action brought on 26 June 2015 — European Commission v French Republic

(Case C-314/15)

(2015/C 294/50)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: O. Beynet and E. Manhaeve, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: French Republic

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | a declaration that in not having assured the secondary treatment or equivalent of urban waste water from 15 agglomerations having a population equivalent between 10  000 and 15  000 for all discharges outside sensitive areas, being a population equivalent of between 2  000 and 10  000 for all discharges in fresh water and estuaries, the French Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 4(1) and (3) of Council Directive 91/271/EEC of 21 May 1991 concerning urban waste-water treatment (1). |
| --- | --- |

—

a declaration that in not having assured the secondary treatment or equivalent of urban waste water from 15 agglomerations having a population equivalent between 10  000 and 15  000 for all discharges outside sensitive areas, being a population equivalent of between 2  000 and 10  000 for all discharges in fresh water and estuaries, the French Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 4(1) and (3) of Council Directive 91/271/EEC of 21 May 1991 concerning urban waste-water treatment (1).

1

| — | that the French Republic should pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

that the French Republic should pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

By its action the Commission complains that France has failed to implement correctly, in 15 agglomerations, Council Directive 91/271/EEC of 21 May 1991 concerning urban waste-water treatment.

Pursuant to Article 4(1) and (3) of Directive 91/271/EEC, agglomerations where the population equivalent (p.e.) is between 10  000 and 15  000 for all discharges outside sensitive areas, being a population equivalent of between 2  000 and 10  000 for all discharges in fresh water and estuaries, must be equipped with collecting systems and waste water undergo a secondary treatment or the equivalent by 31 December 2005 at the latest.

---

(1)  OJ 1991 L 135, p. 40.

1

---
(Reap. Dec. 9377)

#### F. W. Woolworth Co. *v.*United States

Entry No. 5632.

(Decided April 7, 1959)

*Sharretts, Paley & Garter tor*the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Chief Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement relates to certain glass Christmas tree ornaments exported from the Western Zone of Germany and entered at the port of Baltimore, Md.

Stipulated facts, upon which the case has been submitted, establish that the proper basis for appraisement of the articles in question is export value, as defined in section 402(d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, and that such statutory value for the merchandise is the appraised value, less the amount added under duress, and I so hold. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
EPARegion9SIPCOMPLETENESSCHECKLISTToevaluatecompliancewith40CFR51,AppendixVSubmittalDateJanuary12,2012DistrictNameSacramentoMetropolitanAQMDDateReviewedFebruary15,2012EPAReviewerC.G.AllenKey:CNIA0=Complete=Incomplete=NotApplicableToRule=MaterialMissingCoatingOperationsatAerospaceManufacturingandReworkOperationsNegativeDeclarationADMINISTRATIVEMATERIALS(perAppendixV,Section2.1)(a)SubmittalletterfromGovernor/designeex(b)Evidenceofadoptionx(c)State/Districtlegalauthoritytoadoptx(dl)Copyofactualrule/planX(d2)Rulechangesindicatedbyunderline/cross-outN/A(e)Proofthatactionmetproceduralrequirementsx(f)Copyofpublicnoticex(g)Certificationthathearingfulfilledpublicnoticex(h)Publiccomments&agencyresponseN/ATECHNICALSUPPORT(perAppendixV,Section2.2)(a)RegulatedpollutantsidentifiedN/A(b)Affectedsources&attainmentstatusidentifiedN/A(c)Rule/planemissionsimpactN/A(d)Attainment,PSD&otherrequireddemonstrationN/A(e)ModelingsupportasappropriateN/A(f)RelianceoncontinuousemissionreductionsN/A(g)Evidenceoflimits&otherneededrequirementsN/A(i)JustificationfordeviationfromEPApolicyN/AOVERALLCOMPLETENESSCNotes: