alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsApplication of scanning acoustic microscopy to advanced structural ceramicsA review is presentod of research investigations of several acoustic microscopy techniques for application to structural ceramics for advanced heat engines. Results obtained with scanning acoustic microscopy (SAM), scanning laser acoustic microscopy (SLAM), scanning electron acoustic microscopy (SEAM), and photoacoustic microscopy (PAM) are compared. The techniques were evaluated on research samples of green and sintered monolithic silicon nitrides and silicon carbides in the form of modulus-of-rupture bars containing deliberately introduced flaws. Strengths and limitations of the techniques are described with emphasis on statistics of detectability of flaws that constitute potential fracture origins.Document ID19870014554Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsVary, Alex*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Klima, Stanley J.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateJuly 1, 1987Subject CategoryQuality Assurance And ReliabilityReport/Patent NumberNASA-TM-89929NAS 1.15:89929E-3632Accession Number87N23987Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 533-43-11Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19870014554.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

MAHLARD K. BOYD

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 19

- 1292

[ August 8, 2019 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Bernard I. Bober

, Judge; L.T. Case No. 97

- 907CF10A

.

Mahlard K. Boyd, Avon Park, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

L EVINE

, C.J., W ARNER an d G ERBER , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
IN IT I AL REVI EW ENG I NEER I NG REPORT PMN : 15

- 0 4 92 Focus Ready Draft 6/ 11 /20 1 5

MSDS : Yes Labe l : No Gen Eqpt : C h emi cal

- resista n t , i mperv i o u s gloves (butyl rubber , n eopre n e , n i t r i l e rubbe r )/ splash gogg l es/ f ace sh i eld/ use on l y wi th adequat e vent il at i o n . Use p r ocess enc l os ures , l ocal exhaus t ve n t i l a ti on o r oth er enginee r i ng controls to keep wor k er exposure to ai r bo rne contaminants below any recommended or statu tory l i m i t s 

### I use exp l osion

- p r oof vent i lat i o n equ i pment Resp ir ator : u se a p r operly fi t t ed , ai r - puri f y i ng or a ir

- fed resp ir ator comp l ying wi th an approved s t andar d if a risk assessmen t ind i cates t h i s is necessary H

ea l t h E f fects : F lammable l i qu i d a n d vapor ! moderately i r r i ta ti ng to t h e s k in/ irri ta ti ng to eyes . TLV/ PE L : None estab l ished
.

6/05/20 1 5) :Re l ated An a l ogs : Migrat PB T ra ti ng : Pl B2T l H

ea l th : 1
- 2 Dermal, I nha l a t ion E co : 3 Wate r (All re l ease s t o wat er wi t h a CC OCCUPAT I ONAL EX POS U RE RATI NG : 2
- 3A NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTI ONS : 1 ppb)

### IN I TI AL REVI E W ENG I NEERI NG REPORT PMN : 15 - 0 4 92

### IN IT I AL REVI E W ENG I NEERI NG REPORT**P~ :**
1 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

EASTERN DIVISION 

PATRICIA A. COLBERT, 

 Plaintiff, 

 Civil Action 2:12-cv-888 

 vs. Judge Sargus 

 Magistrate Judge King 

 

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, 

 Defendant. 

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 

 Based on the parties’ stipulation, Doc. No. 24, is RECOMMENDED

that the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security be reversed 

pursuant to Sentence 4 of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and that the matter be 

remanded for further administrative proceedings. It is FURTHER 

RECOMMENDED that final judgment be entered accordingly. 

 If any party seeks review by the District Judge of this Report 

and Recommendation, that party may, within fourteen (14) days, file 

and serve on all parties objections to the Report and Recommendation,

specifically designating this Report and Recommendation, and the part 

thereof in question, as well as the basis for objection thereto. 28 

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). Response to objections 

must be filed within fourteen (14) days after being served with a copy 

thereof. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). 

 The parties are specifically advised that failure to object to 

the Report and Recommendation will result in a waiver of the right to 

de novo review by the District Judge and of the right to appeal the 

Case: 2:12-cv-00888-EAS-NMK Doc #: 25 Filed: 06/26/13 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
2 

decision of the District Court adopting the Report and Recommendation. 

See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985); Smith v. Detroit Fed’n of 

Teachers, Local 231 etc., 829 F.2d 1370 (6th Cir. 1987); United States 

v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). 

June 26, 2013 s/Norah McCann King_______ 

 Norah McCann King 

 United States Magistrate Judge

Case: 2:12-cv-00888-EAS-NMK Doc #: 25 Filed: 06/26/13 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Case: 2:13-cv-00016-MHW-MRA Doc #: 19 Filed: 03/05/14 Page: 1 of 12  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:13-cv-00016-MHW-MRA Doc #: 19 Filed: 03/05/14 Page: 2 of 12  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:13-cv-00016-MHW-MRA Doc #: 19 Filed: 03/05/14 Page: 3 of 12  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:13-cv-00016-MHW-MRA Doc #: 19 Filed: 03/05/14 Page: 4 of 12  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:13-cv-00016-MHW-MRA Doc #: 19 Filed: 03/05/14 Page: 5 of 12  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:13-cv-00016-MHW-MRA Doc #: 19 Filed: 03/05/14 Page: 6 of 12  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:13-cv-00016-MHW-MRA Doc #: 19 Filed: 03/05/14 Page: 7 of 12  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:13-cv-00016-MHW-MRA Doc #: 19 Filed: 03/05/14 Page: 8 of 12  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:13-cv-00016-MHW-MRA Doc #: 19 Filed: 03/05/14 Page: 9 of 12  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:13-cv-00016-MHW-MRA Doc #: 19 Filed: 03/05/14 Page: 10 of 12  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:13-cv-00016-MHW-MRA Doc #: 19 Filed: 03/05/14 Page: 11 of 12  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:13-cv-00016-MHW-MRA Doc #: 19 Filed: 03/05/14 Page: 12 of 12  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-11T09:18:52-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
### MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04

- 11

- 00396

- CR

Alex BOSQUEZ

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 290th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2010CR6956

Honorable Melisa Skinner , Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice

Delivered and Filed: June 27, 2012

DISMISSED

Appellant has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. The motion is signed by both

Appellant and his attorney. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.2(a). We, therefore, grant the motion and

dismiss this appeal. See id.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish
## Practicability of Attaining 2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS by December 31, 2015

Site Name Site ID2012 98%2013 98%2014 98%Preliminary 2015 98%Preliminary

2015 DV 2015

Quarters in AQS Max 2015 98%

allowed to attain 2006 24-hr NAAQS (65.4) in 2015 Year of

Lowest valid 98%Lowest valid 98%, '99-'14% Difference

between Max 2015 and lowest 98% 2006 NAAQS

attainment practicable in 2015? Fresno-Garland 060190011 52.6 63.8 66.7 64.3 64.9 2 -24.3 2010 48.8 150% No Bakersfield-California Ave 060290014 56.4 71.8 79.9 67.1 72.9 2 -45.5 2010 53.3 185% No Bakersfield-Planz 060290016 40.6 96.7 76.7 64.3 79.2 2 -67.2 2012 40.6 266% No Hanford 06031100448.3 67.6 81.9 n/a 74.8 0 -43.3 2012 48.3 190% No Fresno-Pacific (Winery) 060195025 42.8 71.6 61.8 54.2 62.5 2 -27.2 2010 37.0 174% No Madera City 060392010 43.2 54.6 56.0 30.6 47.1 1 -4.4 2010 43.2 110% No

2014 98th percentile data for Bakersfield-Planz is based on three quarters of 2014 data, as the second quarter of 2014 data has 73% completeness. The 2003 98th percentile for Bakersfield-California Ave, 46.4 μg/m3, is not considered valid since Q3 and Q4 are incomplete. Thus, the minimum value is 53.3 μg/m3 from 2010. Preliminary 2015 98th percentiles selected from data in AQS as of November 16, 2015. Practicability of attainment in 2015 is from comparing max 2015 98% allowed to lowest values seen during 1999-2014. For all sites, the maximum allowed is considerably smaller than the lowest value seen historically, so attainment is impracticable.

2012 - 2015 98th percentiles from AQS Data Query: 2015-11-16 (AQS Design Value Report, AMP480; see "SJV_DVReport_2012-2015_PM2.5-2006std_11162015").
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                       4,677,726
<SECURITIES>                                 3,560,246
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,041,218
<ALLOWANCES>                                    17,757
<INVENTORY>                                     14,582
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            10,640,106
<PP&E>                                      31,132,039
<DEPRECIATION>                              24,103,765
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              18,255,224
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,547,977
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                        20,925
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                  16,334,672
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                18,255,224
<SALES>                                      9,929,294
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             9,929,294
<CGS>                                        8,620,793
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                9,423,071
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                745,048
<INCOME-TAX>                                    54,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            691,048
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   691,048
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .33
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .33
        

</TABLE>
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D17-2500

_____________________________ S TEVEN S ERRANO , Appellant,
v. S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________ On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County. Russell L. Healy, Judge. January 26, 2018
P ER C URIAM . A FFIRMED . B.L. T HOMAS , C.J., and W OLF and R AY , JJ., concur.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331 .

_____________________________2

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 28 (Monday, February 11, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 9771]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-03028]

[[Page 9771]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)

Notice of Opportunity for Public Comment on Surplus Property 
Release at Brunswick--Golden Isles Airport, Brunswick, GA

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under the provisions of Title 49, U.S.C. 47153(c), notice is 
being given that the FAA is considering a request from the Glynn County 
Airport Commission to waive the requirement that a 0.739-acre parcel of 
surplus property, located on Glynn County airport owned and operated 
land adjacent to, but not contiguace with, Brunswick--Golden Isles 
Airport, be used for aeronautical purposes.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before March 13, 2013.

ADDRESSES: Comments on this notice may be mailed or delivered in 
triplicate to the FAA at the following address: Atlanta Airports 
District Office, Attn: Aimee A. McCormick, Program Manager, 1701 
Columbia Ave., Suite 2-260, Atlanta, GA 30337-2747.
    In addition, one copy of any comments submitted to the FAA must be 
mailed or delivered to Steve Brian, Airport Director of Brunswick--
Golden Isles Airport at the following address: 295 Aviation Parkway, 
Ste. 205, Brunswick, GA 31525.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Aimee McCormick, Program Manager, 
Atlanta Airports District Office, 1701 Columbia Ave., Suite 2-260, 
Atlanta, GA 30337-2747, (404) 305-7143. The application may be reviewed 
in person at this same location.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA is reviewing a request by the Glynn 
County Airport Commission to release 0.739 acres of surplus property at 
the Brunswick--Golden Isles Airport. The property will be purchased 
with intent for Planned or Commerical Development. The location of the 
the land relative to existing or anticipated aircraft noise contours 
greater than 65ldn are not considered to be an issue. The net proceeds 
from the sale of this property will be used for airport purposes. The 
proposed use of this property is compatible with airport operations.
    Any person may inspect the request in person at the FAA office 
listed above under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
    In addition, any person may, upon request, inspect the request, 
notice and other documents germane to the request in person at the 
Brunswick Golden Isles Airport.

    Issued in Atlanta, Georgia on January 30, 2013.
Scott L. Seritt,
Manager, Atlanta Airports District Office, Southern Region.
[FR Doc. 2013-03028 Filed 2-8-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

IN THE INTEREST OF: J.L., A MINOR

PETITION OF: J.L., A MINOR :

:

:

:

: No. 491 MAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 16th day of October, 2019

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
# C_2016200EN.01000401.xml

| 6.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 200/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 200/4

---

Order of the Court of 23 February 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Audiencia Provincial de les Illes Balears (Spain)) — Francisca Garzón Ramos, José Javier Ramos Martín v Banco de Caja España de Inversiones, Salamanca y Soria SA, Intercotrans SL

(Case C-380/15) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Right to effective judicial protection - Mortgage enforcement proceedings - Powers of the national court hearing the case - Failure to implement EU law - Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - Clear lack of jurisdiction of the Court))

(2016/C 200/05)

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Referring court

Audiencia Provincial de les Illes Balears (Spain)

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Francisca Garzón Ramos, José Javier Ramos Martín

Applicants:

Defendants: Banco de Caja España de Inversiones, Salamanca y Soria SA, Intercotrans SL

Defendants:

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

The Court of Justice of the European Union clearly lacks jurisdiction to reply to the questions submitted by the Audiencia Provincial de les Illes Balears (Provincial Court of the Balearic Islands, Spain) by decision of 1 July 2015.

---

(1)  OJ C 354, 26.10.2015.

1

---
# C_2017038EN.01000401.xml

| 6.2.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 38/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.2.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 38/4

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 December 2016 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Audiencia Provincial de Zaragoza, Juzgado de Primera Instancia de Olot — Spain) — Eurosaneamientos SL, Entidad Urbanística Conservación Parque Tecnológico de Reciclado López Soriano, UTE PTR Acciona Infraestructuras SA v ArcelorMittal Zaragoza, SA (C-532/15), Francesc de Bolós Pi v Urbaser SA (C-538/15)

(Joined Cases C-532/15 and C-538/15) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Services provided by Procuradores de los Tribunales - Tariff - Jurisdictions - Derogation impossible))

(2017/C 038/05)

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring courts

Referring courts

Audiencia Provincial de Zaragoza, Juzgado de Primera Instancia de Olot

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Eurosaneamientos SL, Entidad Urbanística Conservación Parque Tecnológico de Reciclado López Soriano, UTE PTR Acciona Infraestructuras SA (C-532/15), Francesc de Bolós Pi (C-538/15)

Applicants:

Defendants: ArcelorMittal Zaragoza, SA (C-532/15), Urbaser SA (C-538/15)

Defendants:

Intervener: Consejo General de Procuradores de España (C-532/15)

Intervener:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

| 1. | Article 101 TFEU, read in conjunction with Article 4(3) TEU, must be interpreted as not precluding national legislation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which makes the fees of procuradores subject to a tariff which may be increased or decreased only by 12 %, in respect of which the national courts merely check its strict application without being in a position, in exceptional circumstances, to derogate from the limits set by that tariff. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Article 101 TFEU, read in conjunction with Article 4(3) TEU, must be interpreted as not precluding national legislation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which makes the fees of procuradores subject to a tariff which may be increased or decreased only by 12 %, in respect of which the national courts merely check its strict application without being in a position, in exceptional circumstances, to derogate from the limits set by that tariff.

| 2. | The Court of Justice of the European Union does not have jurisdiction to answer the second and third questions in Case C-532/15 and the third to fifth questions in Case C-538/15 referred by the Audiencia Provincial de Zaragoza (Provincial Court, Zaragoza, Spain) and the Juzgado de Primera Instancia de Olot (Court of First Instance, Olot, Spain) respectively. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The Court of Justice of the European Union does not have jurisdiction to answer the second and third questions in Case C-532/15 and the third to fifth questions in Case C-538/15 referred by the Audiencia Provincial de Zaragoza (Provincial Court, Zaragoza, Spain) and the Juzgado de Primera Instancia de Olot (Court of First Instance, Olot, Spain) respectively.

---

(1)  OJ C 429, 21.12.2015.

1

---
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Corporate Trust Services**

  MAC R1204-010  9062 Old Annapolis Road  Columbia, MD 21045  Tel: 410 884 2000  Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

Re:          Annual Statement of Compliance for Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc., CommercialMortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2015-UBS8

 

Per the Pooling and ServicingAgreement dated as of December 1, 2015 (the "Agreement"), theundersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., asCertificate Administrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies asfollows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2016 (the "ReportingPeriod"):

 

(a)     A review of Wells Fargo's activities during the Reporting Period and of itsperformance under the Agreement has been made under such officer's supervision;and

 

(b)     Tothe best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo hasfulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respectsthroughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

February 27, 2017

  

 

/s/ Brian Smith

BRIAN SMITH

Vice President

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll  go far |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------|
No. 56139.

protests 173219-K, etc. (New York).

#### Fleming-Joffe, Ltd., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
# C_2017112EN.01000801.xml

| 10.4.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 112/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.4.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 112/8

---

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 16 February 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Secretario Judicial del Juzgado de Violencia sobre la Mujer Único de Terrassa — Spain) — Ramón Margarit Panicello v Pilar Hernández Martínez

(Case C-503/15) (1)

1

((Request for a preliminary ruling - Article 267 TFEU - Registrar - Definition of ‘a court or tribunal’ - Compulsory jurisdiction - Exercise of judicial functions - Independence - Lack of jurisdiction of the Court))

(2017/C 112/11)

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Referring court

Secretario Judicial del Juzgado de Violencia sobre la Mujer Único de Terrassa

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Ramón Margarit Panicello

Applicant:

Defendant: Pilar Hernández Martínez

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court of Justice of the European Union has no jurisdiction to rule on the request for a preliminary ruling submitted by the Secretario Judicial del Juzgado de Violencia sobre la Mujer Único de Terrassa (Registrar of the Single-Member Court dealing with matters involving violence against women, Terrassa, Spain).

---

(1)  OJ C 414, 14.12.2015.

1

---
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: May 6, 2010
    
    By:
    
    /s/ RONALD L. SMITH

Ronald L. SmithVice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer)