alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 3.1f



                           THE UNITED ILLUMINATING COMPANY
                      (A SPECIALLY CHARTERED STOCK CORPORATION)
                  CERTIFICATE AMENDING CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                  BY ACTIONS OF BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND SHAREHOLDERS



     1. The name of the  corporation  is THE UNITED  ILLUMINATING  COMPANY  (the
"Company").

     2. The Certificate of  Incorporation  of the Company is amended only by the
following resolution:

     RESOLVED:  That the Certificate of  Incorporation  of the Company be and it
     hereby  is  amended  by  amending   Section  5  of  said   Certificate   of
     Incorporation to read as follows:

     Section 5. All  corporate  powers of the Company  shall be  exercised by or
     ---------
     under  authority  of, and the business and affairs of the Company  shall be
     managed under the direction of, a Board of Directors consisting of not less
     than three nor more than fifteen individuals, with the number fixed in, and
     increased or decreased from time-to-time by amendment of, the Bylaws of the
     Company.

     3. The above  resolution was recommended to the shareholders of the Company
by the Company's Board of Directors, and was adopted on July 21, 2000 by a dated
and signed unanimous written consent of the shareholders of the Company.

     4. Relative to the approval of the amendment by the Company's shareholders:

     (A)  the  designation  of the shares of the only  shareholder  voting group
          entitled to vote on the amendment was Common Stock; and
     (B)  the number of  outstanding  shares of Common Stock entitled to vote on
          approval of the amendment  was 100,  each share being  entitled to one
          vote; and
     (C)  all of the  outstanding  shares of Common  Stock  entitled  to vote on
          approval of the amendment were owned by one person; and
     (D)  said one person  consented  in writing  to the  adoption  of the above
          resolution  by a writing  dated and signed by said  person on July 21,
          2000.

<PAGE>



WE, THE UNDERSIGNED, being the Chairman of the Board of Directors, President and
Chief Executive Officer, and the Corporate Secretary, of The United Illuminating
Company, hereby declare, under penalties of false statement, that the statements
made in the foregoing certificate are true.

     Dated at New Haven, Connecticut, this 21st day of July, 2000.

                                    THE UNITED ILLUMINATING COMPANY



                                      /s/ Nathaniel D. Woodson
                                    -------------------------------------------
                                      Nathaniel D. Woodson
                                      Chairman of the Board of Directors,
                                      President and Chief Executive Officer



                                      /s/ Susan E. Allen
                                     ------------------------------------------
                                          Susan E. Allen
                                          Corporate Secretary



                                        2
# C_2016136EN.01002303.xml

| 18.4.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 136/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.4.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 136/23

---

Order of the President of the Court of 5 February 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court of Justice Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court) — United Kingdom) — The Queen, on the application of Nutricia Limited v Secretary of State for Health

(Case C-445/15) (1)

1

(2016/C 136/31)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 354, 26.10.2015.

1

---
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 117 

Commemorating the 400th Anniversary of the settlement of Jamestown. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 18, 2007 

Mrs. JO ANN DAVIS of Virginia (for herself, Mr. CANTOR, Mr. WOLF, Mrs. 

DRAKE, Mr. TOM DAVIS of Virginia, Mr. MORAN of Virginia, Mr. SCOTT

of Virginia, Mr. BOUCHER, Mr. GOODLATTE, Mr. FORBES, and Mr. 

GOODE) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Commemorating the 400th Anniversary of the settlement 

of Jamestown. 

Whereas the founding of the colony at Jamestown, Virginia, 

in 1607, the first permanent English colony in America, 

and the capital of Virginia for 92 years, has major significance in the history of the United States; 

Whereas the Jamestown Settlement owed its survival in large 

measure to the compassion and aid of the Native people 

in its vicinity; 

Whereas Native Virginia people substantially aided the 

Jamestown colonists with food and supplies at times that 

were crucial to their survival; 


ccoleman on PRODPC74 with BILLS
2 

•HCON 117 IH 

Whereas the Native people served as guides to geography and 

natural resources, crucial assistance in the Virginia colonists’ exploration of the Chesapeake Region; 

Whereas the Jamestown Settlement brought people from 

throughout the Atlantic Basin together to form a society 

that drew upon the strengths and characteristics of 

English, European, African, and Native American cultures; 

Whereas the economic, political, religious, and social institutions that developed during the first 9 decades of the existence of Jamestown continue to have profound effects 

on the United States, particularly in English common law 

and language, cross cultural relationships, manufacturing, and economic structure and status; 

Whereas the National Park Service, the Association for the 

Preservation of Virginia Antiquities, and the JamestownYorktown Foundation of the Commonwealth of Virginia 

collectively own and operate significant resources related 

to the early history of Jamestown; 

Whereas, in 2000, Congress established the Jamestown 400th 

Commemoration Commission to ensure a suitable national observance of the Jamestown 2007 anniversary, 

and Congress commends the Commission’s hard work 

and dedication; 

Whereas Congress reminds all Americans of the importance 

of their country’s history and founding at Jamestown; 

and 

Whereas the 2007 observance of the founding of Jamestown 

commemorates the 400th anniversary of the first permanent English colony in America: Now, therefore, be it 


ccoleman on PRODPC74 with BILLS
3 

•HCON 117 IH 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That Congress commemorates the 400th An3 niversary of the founding of the colony Jamestown in 1607 

4 and urges all Americans to honor this seminal event in 

5 our Nation’s history. 

Æ 


ccoleman on PRODPC74 with BILLS
**Michigan Supreme Court** 

**Lansing, Michigan**

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

August 12, 2014 

# Order

August 12, 2014

149599 ( 78 )

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.

, Plaintiff

- Appell ant

,

v

FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE

COMPANY, PATRIOT TITLE AGENCY, KIRK D.

SCHIEB, WESTMINSTER ABSTRACT

COMPANY, WESTMINSTER TITLE AGENCY,

INC

. , PRIME FINANCIAL GROUP, INC

. , VALENTINO M. TRABUCCHI, PAMELA S.

NOTTURNO, f/k/a PAMELA S. SIIRA, DOUGLAS

K. SMITH, JOSHUA J. GRIGGS, STATE VALUE

APPRAISALS, LLC, NATHAN B. HOGAN, and

CHRI STINE D. MAYS,

Defendants

- Appellees,

and

FRED MATSON, MICHAEL LYNETT, JO KAY

JAMES, and PAUL SMITH,

Defendants. SC: 149599

COA: 307756

Oakland CC: 2010

- 112606

- CK

________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of the plaintiff

- appellant to extend the

time for filing its reply briefs in this application for leave to appeal is GRANTED. The

reply briefs will be accepted as timely filed if filed on or before September 8, 2014.
Exhibit 99.1


                                  CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
           AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Richard R. Erkeneff, as Chief Executive Officer of United Industrial
Corporation (the "Company") certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss. 1350, as adopted
by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) the accompanying Form 10-Q report for the period ending June 30, 2002 as
filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report") fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date  August 12, 2002                          /s/ Richard R. Erkeneff
      ---------------                          ------------------------------
                                               Richard R. Erkeneff
                                               Chief Executive Officer
                                               of the Company
No. 48057.

#### Protest 63833-K of W. R. Zanes & Co. (Galveston).

Opinion by

Walker, J.

It appeared that the bits in question consisted of a frame into which were set cutters made wholly or partly of tungsten carbide, which was made of either imported or substituted domestic material. The bits" were exported to Canada, and there used, and, prior to the filing of a drawback entry, they were reimported. As thus reimported the cutters were in worn condition and not usable for their original purpose. After reimportation the old cutters were removed and new cutters welded in, the old cutters being classed as scrap and used as such. It appeared that upon reimportation of the bits from Canada they were allowed free entry as American goods returned under the provisions of paragraph 1615, as amended by section 35 of the Customs Administrative Act of 1938 (T. D. 49646). In view of the qualifications of subparagraph (e) of paragraph 1615,' due to the fact that there was a lapse of time between exportation of the bits in question and the filing of the claim for drawback, during which time the merchandise was reimported as American goods returned, the court was of the opinion that both provisions of the statute, paragraph 1615 as amended and section 313 (b), must be'read together, in which case it is apparent that Congress intended that the benefit of only one of these provisions could be claimed. It was the opinion of the court that the plaintiff had the choice of two rights, either of which could be exercised, but not both, and in this case the plaintiff elected to secure, fre.e entry as American goods returned. Therefore it was held that the plaintiff is barred from claiming drawback. On the record presented the protest was overruled in all respects.
Before the Second Division,

June 23, 1960

No. 64344.

protests 147948-K, etc. (New York).

#### I. Freeman & Son, Inc. *v.*United States,

*520Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items marked “C” consist of candlesticks similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 62036, the claim at 25 percent under paragraph 397, as modified by T.D. 51802, was sustained. The items marked “A,” stipulated to be the same as the candlesticks involved in said Abstract 62036, except that they are not plated with platinum, gold, or silver, nor colored with gold lacquer, were held dutiable at 22% percent under paragraph 397, as modified by T.D. 51802.
# C_2016279EN.01002401.xml

| 1.8.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 279/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.8.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 279/24

---

Order of the President of the Court of 15 April 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sächsisches Oberverwaltungsgericht — Germany) — Der Bundesbeauftragte für Asylangelegenheiten beim Bundesamt für Migration und Flüchtlinge v N, in the presence of: Federal Republic of Germany

(Case C-150/15) (1)

1

(2016/C 279/32)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Grand Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 236, 20.7.2015.

1

---
No. 54851.

#### A. S. Beck Shoe Corp. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 151866-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of reptile skins the same in all material respects as those passed upon in *Fleming-Joffe, Ltd.*v. *United States*(25 Cust. Ct. 56, C. D. 1263), the claim for free entry under paragraph 1765 was sustained.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

John Arthurs, 

Petitioner, 

v. Case No. 2:11-cv-541

Warden, Warren Correctional JUDGE ALGENON L. MARBLEY

Institution, Magistrate Judge Kemp

Respondent. 

 

ORDER

 This case is before the Court to consider a Report and Recommendation issued by the

Magistrate Judge on March 23, 2012. No objections have been filed to the Report and

Recommendation. Therefore, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation. The

petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 s/Algenon L. Marbley 

Algenon L. Marbley

United States District Judge

Case: 2:11-cv-00541-ALM-TPK Doc #: 15 Filed: 08/28/12 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
N E W JEESK Y SENAX E 

CONTROL NO 

NICHOLA S P. SCUTARI 

SENATOR. DISTRICT 2 2 

1514 E. SAINT GEOHGES AVENUE 

LINDEN. N J 0703 6 

TEU-. I9081 587-040 4 

FAX: I908I 587-9312 

COMMITTEES: 

STATE GOVERNMENT - CHAIHMA N 

SPACE UTILIZATION - CHAIRMA N 

COMMERCE - MEMBER 

JUDICIAR Y - MEMBER 

March 4, 2010 

The Honorable Ray LaHood, Secretary 

United States Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

Subject: Haneda Combination Services Allocation Proceeding DOT-OST-2010-0018 

Dear Secretary LaHood: 

I support the Continental Airlines application to provide daily nonstop service between New 

York/Newark and Tokyo Haneda airport. New air service to Haneda, which is scheduled to begin later 

this year, is made possible by the wide ranging open skies agreement with Japan achieved by your 

P^partment..' I respectfully request that you select Continental to provide service connecting the U.S.'s 

financial and commercial center at New York/Newark with Tokyo's central/downtown airport. 

Continental's Liberty - Haneda service would provide a critical link between two of the world's largest 

economies and will help boost trade and commerce across the New York/Newark region and secondarily 

across the entire northeastern region of the U.S. Liberty airport is surrounded by the largest population 

per square mile in the country, which includes millions of Asian-Americans. Additionally, flights added 

will translate into local economy benefits. As employment is sustained, regional incomes are enhanced 

and trade expands. 

Continental operates the largest hub in the region that connects New York/Newark and much of the U.S. 

to the world. Hopefully, this will be taken into account when awarding any route to Haneda. 

I urge you to award Tokyo Haneda rights to Continental Airlines and my region of the U.S. If you have 

any further qiwstions or concerns, please feel free to contact my office. 

With bes/wishes. 

as P. Sci _ 

, 22"'' District: 

NPS/fas
# C_2016364EN.01000901.xml

| 3.10.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 364/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.10.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 364/9

---

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 7 July 2016 — HIT Groep BV v European Commission

(Case C-514/15 P) (1)

((Appeal - Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - European prestressing steel market - Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 - Article 23(2) - Calculation of the amount of the fine - Upper limit of the fine - Total turnover in the ‘preceding business year’ - Reference to a business year other than the one preceding the adoption of the contested decision - Principle of proportionality))

(2016/C 364/03)

Language of the case: Dutch

Parties

Appellant: HIT Groep BV (represented by: G. van der Wal and L. Parret, advocaten)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: P. Van Nuffel, S. Noë and V. Bottka, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

| 2. | Hit Groep BV shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Hit Groep BV shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 398, 30.11.2015.

---
No. 44205.

#### Protest 33726-K of Whittaker, Clark & Daniels, Inc. (Philadelphia).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of *Chrystal*v. *United States*(4 Cust. Ct. 166, C. D. 291) the merchandise in question was held dutiable as pumice stone, unmanufactured, at one-tenth of 1 cent per pound under paragraph 206 as claimed.
#### Sylvan Green Marble Co., Appellant, *v.*Williams & Co.

(No. 2.)

Argued March 16, 1925.

Appeal, No. 96, October T., 1925, by plaintiff, from C. P. Northampton Co., Sitting *523in Equity, February T., 1924, No. 5, in the case of Sylvan Green Marble Company v. C. K. Williams.

July 9, 1925:

Before Porter, Henderson, Trexler, Keller, Linn and Gawthrop, JJ.

Appeal dismissed.

Opinion by

Keller, J.,

This appeal is from the same decree passed upon by this court in the opinion filed to No. 94, October Term, 1925. The plaintiff appealed from the decree in so far as it fixed the damages to be paid by the defendant. We are all of opinion that the court committed no error in this respect, if the plaintiff was entitled to a decree, as it was based on the only definite and exact evidence of the quantity of stone removed since 1918; but as we have decided the main point adversely to the plaintiff, the appeal is dismissed, at the costs of the appellant.
No. 55454.

#### T. C. Carlin Company et al. *v.*United States,

protests 74580-K, etc. (Boston).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the-merchandise consists of lining bellies and shoulders the same in all material respects-as those passed upon in *Rice & Co. Corp.*v. *United States*(66 Treas. Dec. 612, T. D. 47371), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000100166
<NAME>                        TULTEX CORP
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JAN-02-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   APR-04-1998
<CASH>                                            949
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   96,672
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,925
<INVENTORY>                                    241,505
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               352,257
<PP&E>                                         350,074
<DEPRECIATION>                                 208,547
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 554,214
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           44,281
<BONDS>                                        307,672
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      8,031
<COMMON>                                        29,885
<OTHER-SE>                                     157,315
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   554,214
<SALES>                                        100,273
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               100,273
<CGS>                                           80,954
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  104,570
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,908
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (11,205)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,370   
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (6,835)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (6,835)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .23 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .23
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<CIK> 0000100122
<NAME> TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                    1,915,494
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                     62,195
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         303,553
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                       314,681
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                  77,110
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,673,033
<COMMON>                                       639,571
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                            0
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                          (386,186)
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 253,385
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                         1,214,423
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                    1,725
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                    887,116
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                11,698
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 304,686
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                2,673,033
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      593,969
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            19,398 
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     466,079
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     485,477
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        108,492
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                              16,167
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 124,659
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        88,819
<NET-INCOME>                                    35,840 
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                          0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   35,840 
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                             0
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                            0
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         110,241
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>