alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

United States of America

v. 2:13-cr-275

William J. Keil 

ORDER

There being no objections, the court hereby adopts the Report

and Recommendation of the magistrate judge (Doc. 23) that the

defendant’s guilty plea be accepted. The court accepts the

defendant’s plea of guilty to Count 1 of the information, and he is

hereby adjudged guilty on that count. The court will defer the

decision of whether to accept the plea agreement until the

sentencing hearing.

Date: January 7, 2014 s\James L. Graham 

 James L. Graham

 United States District Judge

Case: 2:13-cr-00275-JLG Doc #: 25 Filed: 01/07/14 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

 

CERTIFICATION OF CEO PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Trinity Capital Corporation, a New Mexico corporation (the “Company”), for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), William C. Enloe, as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1)          The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Trinity Capital Corporation and will be retained by Trinity Capital Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 
| /s/ WILLIAM C. ENLOE                  |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|
| William C. Enloe                      |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |
| August 14, 2003                       |

 

 

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

 

1
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 80 (Thursday, April 26, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 20842]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-7981]



[[Page 20842]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP07-402-000]


Great Lakes Gas Transmission Limited Partnership; Notice of 
Proposed Changes in FERC Gas Tariff

April 20, 2007.
    Take notice that on April 18, 2007, Great Lakes Gas Transmission 
Limited Partnership (Great Lakes) tendered for filing as part of its 
FERC Gas Tariff the following tariff sheets, to become effective 
February 22, 2007:

Fourth Revised Sheet No. 0
Third Revised Sheet No. 50Q
Ninth Revised Sheet No. 65
Third Revised Sheet No. 85
Third Revised Sheet No. 86B
Fifth Revised Sheet No. 88

    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed in accordance with the provisions of 
Section 154.210 of the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 154.210). 
Anyone filing an intervention or protest must serve a copy of that 
document on the Applicant. Anyone filing an intervention or protest on 
or before the intervention or protest date need not serve motions to 
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#591f1c0b1a16373530373c0a2c2929362b2d193f3c2b3a773e362f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="20666572636f4e4c494e45735550504f525460464552430e474f56">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-7981 Filed 4-25-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
************** * -COMM. JOURNPL - *******x< >** **** * Dfli EflUG-18-1999 **** * TIH E16:5 0 ***P.0 1 flOD E = MEnOR

YTRfiNSfllSSlO K' STi:iRT=nuG-i e 16:4 9 END=aUG-1 6 16:5 3 EiL E N0. = 11 1 . . • " ST N NO . co n ABE R NO . STfiTlO N NPME/TEL.NO . POGE S DURRTIO N 00 1 O

Ks 91501362228 0 • 002/00 2 03:01'16 " -SUPERFUN D Di U

*********************************** * - - **** * - 2146&56'4&0 - ******** *



## SUPERFUN D BRANC H OFFIC EO FREGIONA LCOUNSE L U.S . EP A REGIO N6 144 5 Ros s Avenue , Ste . 120 0 Dallas , Texa s 75202-273 3 

# F^""*-. , Telephon e No . (214 ) 665-2134 , 213 5 Telefax No . (214 ) 665-646 0 U l \pf ^ 

### FACSIMIL ETRANSMISSIO N FROM : TO : 

### SUBJ : COMMENTTS : 

## PCyu4A4J- ^ AXT^Zj^y ^ /IS. . . 

# ^^F[ ^ ZittP4U 4 J^ ^

TOTALNO . PAGES : SEN T BY : DATE/TIM E 

# zir/i 1 905036 8
DuPont Chemicals and Fluoroproducts

Chambers Works

Deepwater, NJ 08023

November 1 , 2012

Director, Chemical Control Division

US Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics

EPA East

Room 4146

1201 Constitution Avenue, NW

Washington, DC 20004

Re: EPA

– HQ

– OPPT

– 2003

- 0012

DuPont Chambers Works NJPDES Permit No. NJ0005100

PFOA Data Submittal

– Outfall DSN662 Weekly Grab Samples

August and September 2012 Sample Data

Dear Chemical Control Division:

Attached please find a summary of PFOA analytical results for the DuPont Chambers Works

weekly grab samples taken at internal outfall DSN662A in August and September 2012. In

accordance with the current site NJPDES permit (NJ0005100, effective September 2011), these

resu lts are provided to NJDEP on a monthly basis via electronic discharge monitoring reports.

Per your request, the enclosures include two paper and two electronic copies of the analytical

results from this monitoring period.

Sincerely,

Jacques Monteux

Unit Manager

- Site Manufacturing Systems

DuPont Chambers Works

JM/clc

EnclosuresCopy to:

Document Control Office

US Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics

EPA East

Room 6428

1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW

Washington, DC 20460

Ms. Susan Rosenwinkel (cover letter only)

Principal Environmental Engineer

NJDEP Division of Water Quality

Bureau of Point Source Permitting

– Region 2

401 E. State Street

P.O. Box 029

Trenton, NJ 08625

- 0029
# C_2005297EN.01000801.xml

| 29.11.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 297/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.11.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 297/8

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case COMP/M.4045 — Deutsche Bahn/BAX Global)

(2005/C 297/05)

(Text with EEA relevance)

| 1. | On 22 November 2005, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which the undertaking Deutsche Bahn AG (‘Deutsche Bahn’, Germany) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Council Regulation control of the whole of the undertaking BAX Global Inc. (‘BAX Global’, USA) by way of purchase of shares. |
| --- | --- |

1.

On 22 November 2005, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which the undertaking Deutsche Bahn AG (‘Deutsche Bahn’, Germany) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Council Regulation control of the whole of the undertaking BAX Global Inc. (‘BAX Global’, USA) by way of purchase of shares.

1

| 2. | The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:






  — | for undertaking Deutsche Bahn: passenger transport, freight transport, freight forwarding and logistics; |
| --- | --- | --- |

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

—

for undertaking Deutsche Bahn: passenger transport, freight transport, freight forwarding and logistics;

| — | for undertaking BAX Global: freight forwarding and logistics. |
| --- | --- |

—

for undertaking BAX Global: freight forwarding and logistics.

| 3. | On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. However, the final decision on this point is reserved. |
| --- | --- |

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

| 4. | The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
  Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (No (32-2) 296 43 01 or 296 72 44) or by post, under reference number COMP/M.4045 — Deutsche Bahn/BAX Global, to the following address:





  European Commission |
| --- | --- |
| Competition DG |
| Merger Registry |
| J-70 |
| BE-1049 Brussels |

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (No (32-2) 296 43 01 or 296 72 44) or by post, under reference number COMP/M.4045 — Deutsche Bahn/BAX Global, to the following address:

European Commission

Competition DG

Merger Registry

J-70

BE-1049 Brussels

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
# C_2008330EN.01S00301.xml

| 30.12.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 330/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.12.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 330/s3

---

NOTE TO THE READER

NOTE TO THE READER

The institutions have decided no longer to quote in their texts the last amendment to cited acts.

Unless otherwise indicated, references to acts in the texts published here are to the version of those acts currently in force.

---
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NHY/Research

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JAIRO ALVAREZ,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 06-72177

Agency No. A070-785-083

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 15, 2009** 

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

Jairo Alvarez, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of the

Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an

immigration judge’s order denying his motion to reopen in order to apply for

FILED

DEC 30 2009

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
NHY/Research 2 06-72177

adjustment of status. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. Reviewing for

abuse of discretion, Singh v. INS, 295 F.3d 1037, 1039 (9th Cir. 2002), we deny in

part and dismiss in part the petition for review. 

The agency did not abuse its discretion by denying Alvarez’s motion to

reopen, because the agency considered the evidence he submitted and acted within

its broad discretion in determining that reopening was not warranted. See id. at

1039 (The BIA’s denial of a motion to reopen shall be reversed if it is “arbitrary,

irrational, or contrary to law.”).

We lack jurisdiction to review the agency’s decision not to invoke its sua

sponte authority to reopen proceedings under 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a). See Ekimian v.

INS, 303 F.3d 1153, 1159 (9th Cir. 2002). 

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.
Case: 2:12-cv-01140-EAS-EPD Doc #: 84 Filed: 01/20/15 Page: 1 of 3 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Case: 2:12-cv-01140-EAS-EPD Doc #: 84 Filed: 01/20/15 Page: 2 of 3 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Case: 2:12-cv-01140-EAS-EPD Doc #: 84 Filed: 01/20/15 Page: 3 of 3 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Exhibit 15
                                                               
                                                               




Tucson Electric Power Company
220 West Sixth Street
Tucson, Arizona  85701

We have made a review, in accordance with standards established
by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, of
the unaudited interim financial information of Tucson Electric
Power Company and subsidiaries (the Company) for the three-
month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 1997 and 1996, as
indicated in our report dated October 20, 1997; because we did not
perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on that information.

We are aware that our report referred to above, which is
included in your Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended September 30, 1997, is incorporated by reference in
Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement No. 33-
55732 of the Company on Form S-3, Registration Statement No. 33-
58173 of UniSource Energy Corporation on Form S-4, Registration 
Statements No. 33-56523, No. 33-57233 and No. 33-57231 of the
Company on Form S-8 and Registration Statement No. 33-31043 on
Form S-3.

We are also aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to
Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered
a part of the Registration Statement prepared or certified by
an accountant or a report prepared or certified by an
accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.



DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Tucson, Arizona
November 10, 1997
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM 
UNITED AIR LINES, INC.'S STATEMENT OF CONSOLIDATED OPERATIONS FOR 
THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND CONDENSED STATEMENT OF 
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL POSITION AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND IS 
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000,000
       
<S>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                               JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                 SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      9-MOS
<CASH>                                               394
<SECURITIES>                                         401
<RECEIVABLES>                                      1,444
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                          364
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   3,126
<PP&E>                                            18,621
<DEPRECIATION>                                     5,772
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    19,158
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              5,905
<BONDS>                                            4,756
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                               0
<OTHER-SE>                                         3,669
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      19,158
<SALES>                                                0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  13,247
<CGS>                                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     11,982
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   270
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    1,146
<INCOME-TAX>                                         391
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  755
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                         755
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          0
        

</TABLE>
#### United States *v.*James Loudon & Co.

No. 7618.

Entry No. 911, etc.

— Invoices dated Mexico City, Mexico, September 11, 1944, etc.

Certified September 14, 1944, etc.

Entered at Los Angeles, Calif., September 29, 1944, etc.

(Decided September 27, 1948)

*David N. Edelstein,*Assistant Attorney General *(William J. Vitale,*special attorney), for the plaintiff.

*Lawrence, Tuttle & Harper (George R. Tuttle*of counsel) for the defendant.

Cline, Judge:

The appeals listed in Schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, are collector’s appeals for reappraisement of phonograph records imported from Mexico. The merchandise was. invoiced, entered, and appraised at $0.62 apiece.

At the trial counsel for the Government stated:

Mb. Vitale: Now the Government offers to stipulate with counsel for the defendant that in each of these appeals which have been consolidated for trial the export value of the imported merchandise at the time of exportation of such merchandise to the United States at which such and similar merchandise was. freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course-of trade for exportation to the United States is the invoiced, entered, and appraised value plus 3 pesos per case for packing, tax included, and that there was. no other higher foreign value for such or similar merchandise.

Mb. Tuttle : That is agreeable, Your Honor.

On the agreed facts I find tlie export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved and that such value is the invoiced, entered, and appraised value, plus 3. pesos per case for packing, tax included.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
III 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 508 

Designating October 20, 2006, as ‘‘National Mammography Day’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 13, 2006 

Mr. BIDEN (for himself, Mr. VITTER, Mrs. MURRAY, Mr. SANTORUM, Mr. 

BROWNBACK, Mr. INHOFE, Ms. COLLINS, Mr. JOHNSON, Mr. COCHRAN, 

Mr. VOINOVICH, Mr. SPECTER, Mr. GRASSLEY, Mr. LEAHY, Mr. ALLEN, 

and Mr. NELSON of Nebraska) submitted the following resolution; which 

was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

JULY 12, 2006 

Committee discharged; considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating October 20, 2006, as ‘‘National Mammography 

Day’’. 

Whereas, according to the American Cancer Society, in 2006, 

212,920 women will be diagnosed with breast cancer and 

40,970 women will die from that disease; 

Whereas it is estimated that about 2,000,000 women were diagnosed with breast cancer in the 1990s, and that, in 

nearly 500,000 of those cases, the cancer resulted in 

death; 

Whereas African-American women suffer a 30 percent greater mortality rate from breast cancer than White women 


ycherry on PROD1PC61 with BILLS
2 

SRES 508 ATS 

and more than a 100 percent greater mortality rate from 

breast cancer than women from Hispanic, Asian, and 

American Indian populations; 

Whereas the risk of breast cancer increases with age, with a 

woman at age 70 having twice as much of a chance of 

developing the disease as a woman at age 50; 

Whereas at least 80 percent of the women who get breast 

cancer have no family history of the disease; 

Whereas mammograms, when operated professionally at a 

certified facility, can provide safe screening and early detection of breast cancer in many women; 

Whereas mammography is an excellent method for early detection of localized breast cancer, which has a 5-year survival rate of more than 97 percent; 

Whereas the National Cancer Institute and the American 

Cancer Society continue to recommend periodic mammograms; and 

Whereas the National Breast Cancer Coalition recommends 

that each woman and her health care provider make an 

individual decision about mammography: Now, therefore, 

be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates October 20, 2006, as ‘‘National 

3 Mammography Day’’; and 

4 (2) encourages the people of the United States 

5 to observe the day with appropriate programs and 

6 activities. 

Æ 


ycherry on PROD1PC61 with BILLS