alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2017249EN.01000501.xml

| 31.7.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 249/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.7.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 249/5

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 8 June 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Wuppertal — Germany) — proceedings brought by Mircea Florian Freitag

(Case C-541/15) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Citizenship of the Union - Article 21 TFEU - Freedom to move and reside in the Member States - Individual having the nationality of both the Member State in which he resides and the Member State in which he was born - Change of surname in the Member State of birth not carried out during a period of habitual residence - Name corresponding to birth name - Application for the entry of that name in the civil register of the Member State of residence - Rejection of that application - Reason - Name not acquired during a period of habitual residence - Existence of other procedures in national law to have that name recognised))

(2017/C 249/06)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Amtsgericht Wuppertal

Parties to the main proceedings

Mircea Florian Freitag

Operative part of the judgment

Article 21 TFEU must be interpreted as precluding the registry office of a Member State from refusing to recognise and enter in the civil register the name legally acquired by a national of that Member State in another Member State, of which he is also a national, and which is the same as his birth name, on the basis of a provision of national law which makes the possibility of having such an entry made, by declaration to the registry office, subject to the condition that that name must have been acquired during a period of habitual residence in that other Member State, unless there are other provisions of national law which effectively allow the recognition of that name.

---

(1)  
  OJ C 48, 8.2.2016.

---
D.C. to Richmond Southeast High Speed Rail QQ-1 

APPENDIX QQ: TRACK CHARTS
No. 54845.

#### Anco Import Corp. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 156954-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
# C_2015302EN.01001501.xml

| 14.9.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 302/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.9.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 302/15

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato (Italy) lodged on 11 June 2015 — Beca Engineering Srl v Ministero dell’Interno

(Case C-285/15)

(2015/C 302/19)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Referring court

Consiglio di Stato

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Beca Engineering Srl

Applicant:

Defendant: Ministero dell’Interno

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Does Council Directive 89/106/EEC of 21 December 1988 on the approximation of laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to construction products (1), as amended by Regulation (EC) No 1882/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 September 2003 (2), preclude the requirement that flues must ‘be constructed using non-combustible materials’, in accordance with the requirements of Schedule IX to the Fifth Part, Part II, of Legislative Decree No 152 of 3 April 2006 regarding ‘civil heating systems’, which has not been notified?

1

2

---

(1)  OJ 1989 L 40, p. 12.

1

(2)  Regulation (EC) No 1882/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 September 2003 adapting to Council Decision 1999/468/EC the provisions relating to committees which assist the Commission in the exercise of its implementing powers laid down in instruments subject to the procedure referred to in Article 251 of the EC Treaty (OJ 2003 L 284, p. 1).

2

---
# C_2017168EN.01001401.xml

| 29.5.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 168/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.5.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 168/14

---

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 22 March 2017 — European Commission v Portuguese Republic

(Case C-665/15) (1)

1

((Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Transport - Driving licences - EU driving licence network - Use of and connection to the EU network))

(2017/C 168/16)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: J. Hottiaux, M. Farrajota and P. Guerra e Andrade, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Portuguese Republic (represented by: L. Inez Fernandes, M. Figueiredo and C. Guerra Santos, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Rules that, by not having put in place the connection to the EU driving licence network, the Portuguese Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 7(5)(d) of Directive 2006/126/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 December 2006 on driving licences; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Rules that, by not having put in place the connection to the EU driving licence network, the Portuguese Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 7(5)(d) of Directive 2006/126/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 December 2006 on driving licences;

| 2. | Orders the Portuguese Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Portuguese Republic to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 59, 15.2.2016.

1

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

United States of America, 

 

vs.

 Case No. 2:13-cr-24

Terrance J. King JUDGE JAMES L. GRAHAM

 

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

The Defendant, by consent, has appeared before me pursuant to

Rule 11, F.R.Cr.P. and has entered a plea of guilty to Counts Four,

Eight and Ten of the Indictment. After examining the Defendant under

oath concerning each of the subjects mentioned in Rule 11, I determine

that the defendant is competent and capable of entering an informed

plea, that the guilty plea is knowingly and voluntary made and that

the offenses charged are supported by an independent basis in fact

containing each of the essential elements of such offense.

I therefore RECOMMEND the plea agreement and the plea of

guilty should be accepted and the Defendant should be adjudged guilty

and sentenced accordingly. Otherwise, the plea agreement should be

rejected and the defendant should be allowed to withdraw the guilty

plea.

The defendant remains on bond pending sentencing.

Date: December 5, 2013 /s/ Terence P. Kemp

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE

Failure to file written objections to this Report and

Recommendation within fourteen (14) days from the date of its service

shall bar an aggrieved party from attacking such Report and

Recommendation before the assigned United States District Judge. 28

U.S.C. Section 636(b)(1)(B).

Case: 2:13-cr-00024-JLG Doc #: 40 Filed: 12/05/13 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
# Official Journal L 199/2019

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 199 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6226 July 2019 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 199

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6226 July 2019

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/1262 of 25 July 2019 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1141 to update the list of invasive alien species of Union concern | 1 |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Council Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/1263 of 18 July 2019 concerning the issuance of a commemorative coin with a common design to mark the 35th anniversary of the Erasmus programme | 5 |
| | * | Political and Security Committee Decision (CFSP) 2019/1264 of 23 July 2019 on the appointment of the EU Mission Force Commander of the European Union military mission to contribute to the training of Somali security forces (EUTM Somalia) (EUTM Somalia/1/2019) | 6 |
| | | GUIDELINES |
| | * | Guideline (EU) 2019/1265 of the European Central Bank of 10 July 2019 on the euro short-term rate (€STR) (ECB/2019/19) | 8 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/1262 of 25 July 2019 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1141 to update the list of invasive alien species of Union concern

1

DECISIONS

*

Council Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/1263 of 18 July 2019 concerning the issuance of a commemorative coin with a common design to mark the 35th anniversary of the Erasmus programme

5

*

Political and Security Committee Decision (CFSP) 2019/1264 of 23 July 2019 on the appointment of the EU Mission Force Commander of the European Union military mission to contribute to the training of Somali security forces (EUTM Somalia) (EUTM Somalia/1/2019)

6

GUIDELINES

*

Guideline (EU) 2019/1265 of the European Central Bank of 10 July 2019 on the euro short-term rate (€STR) (ECB/2019/19)

8

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
# C_2017070EN.01000302.xml

| 6.3.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 70/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.3.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 70/3

---

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 19 January 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Appeal Commissioners — Ireland) — National Roads Authority v The Revenue Commissioners

(Case C-344/15) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Common system of value added tax - Directive 2006/112/EC - Article 13(1), second subparagraph - Activity of managing road infrastructure and making it available on payment of a toll - Activities engaged in by a body governed by public law acting as a public authority - Presence of private operators - Significant distortions of competition - Existence of actual or potential competition))

(2017/C 070/04)

Language of the case: English

Referring court

Referring court

Appeal Commissioners

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: National Roads Authority

Applicant:

Defendant: The Revenue Commissioners

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The second subparagraph of Article 13(1) of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax must be interpreted as meaning that, in a situation such that in the main proceedings, a body governed by public law which carries on an activity consisting in providing access to a road on payment of a toll may not be regarded as competing with private operators who collect tolls on other toll roads pursuant to an agreement with the public law body concerned under national statutory provisions.

---

(1)  OJ C 311, 21.9.2015.

1

---
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

September 28, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 128389 Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Stephen J. Markman,

Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices 

v SC: 128389 

 COA: 251511 
 Wayne CC: 03-005153-01 

DAVID TODD DALTON,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 17, 2005 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

t0919 

I, CORBIN R. DAVIS, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 28, 2005 

Clerk
III 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 83 

Commemorating the 65th Anniversary of the Black Press of America. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 16, 2005 

Mr. SANTORUM (for himself, Mrs. HUTCHISON, Mr. KENNEDY, Mr. MARTINEZ, Mr. LEVIN, and Mr. LUGAR) submitted the following resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Commemorating the 65th Anniversary of the Black Press 

of America. 

Whereas on February 29, 1940, the Black Press of America 

gathered for the first time in Chicago, Illinois; 

Whereas the Black Press of America joins together over 200 

African-American community newspapers from across the 

United States; 

Whereas the African-American press has profoundly influenced the fight for the rights of African-Americans; 

Whereas African-American newspapers articulated the ideals 

of freedom and equality during those times in the history 

of the United States when the country failed to honor its 

commitment to the founding principles of the Nation; 
2 

•SRES 83 IS

Whereas the African-American press has fostered pride, solidarity, and self-reliance within the African-American 

community; 

Whereas the African-American press has had a profound influence on the rise of opinion, leadership, and group action among African-Americans; 

Whereas the African-American press has operated as an instrument of social change for decades as it has protested 

inequality and spotlighted the achievements of AfricanAmericans; 

Whereas African-American newspapers continue to broaden 

the social discourse surrounding the struggle of today’s 

African-Americans for equal opportunity; and 

Whereas commemorating the Black Press of America acknowledges the significant role all African-American 

newspapers have played in the history of the United 

States: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate commemorates the 65th 

2 Anniversary of the Black Press of America by recog3 nizing— 

4 (1) the significant contributions all African5 American newspapers have made from the time of 

6 slavery and segregation to today; and 

7 (2) the continued contributions African-Amer8 ican newspapers make to the ideal of equal oppor9 tunity for all Americans. 

Æ
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 June 19, 2019

p0612

Order 

Clerk

June 19, 2019

159122

MARGARET BARNOWSKI,

Claimant-Appellant,

v SC: 159122

COA: 344917

Livingston CC: 17-000079-AE

CLEARY UNIVERSITY and 

UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE AGENCY,

Appellees.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 4, 2019 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of 

granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for 

consideration as on leave granted.
# C_2016156EN.01001601.xml

| 2.5.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 156/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.5.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 156/16

---

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 3 March 2016 — Teva Pharma BV, Teva Pharmaceuticals Europe BV v European Medicines Agency (EMA), European Commission

(Case C-138/15 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - Orphan medicinal products - Regulation (EC) No 141/2000 - Regulation (EC) No 847/2000 - Refusal to grant marketing authorisation for the generic version of the orphan medicinal product ‘imatinib mesylate’))

(2016/C 156/22)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Appellants: Teva Pharma BV, Teva Pharmaceuticals Europe BV (represented by: K. Bacon QC, E. Mackenzie, Barrister, and G. Morgan, Solicitor)

Appellants:

Other parties to the proceedings: European Medicines Agency (EMA) (represented by: N. Rampal Olmedo, M. Tovar Gomis, S. Marino and T. Jabłoński, acting as Agents), European Commission (represented by: A. Sipos and M. Šimerdová, acting as Agents)

Other parties to the proceedings:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal.

| 2. | Orders Teva Pharma BV and Teva Pharmaceuticals Europe BV to bear their own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Medicines Agency (EMA). |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Teva Pharma BV and Teva Pharmaceuticals Europe BV to bear their own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Medicines Agency (EMA).

| 3. | Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 190, 8.6.2015.

1

---
# C_2016145EN.01001401.xml

| 25.4.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 145/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.4.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 145/14

---

Appeal brought on 15 July 2015 by Harper Hygienics S.A. against the judgment of the General Court delivered on 13 May 2015 in Case T-363/12 Harper Hygienics v OHIM — Clinique Laboratories (CLEANIC natural beauty)

(Case C-374/15 P)

(2016/C 145/17)

Language of the case: Polish

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Harper Hygienics S.A. (represented by: D. Rzążewska)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), Clinique Laboratories, LLC

Other parties to the proceedings:

By order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 28 January 2016 the appeal was dismissed in its entirety.

---
USCA Case #12-1451 Document #1439922 Filed: 06106/2013 Page 1 of 1 

;lliuitdt ~tates <!loud of J\ppeals 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT 

No. 12-1451 

Ventura Air Services, Inc., 

Petitioner 

v. 

Federal Aviation Administration, 

Respondent 

September Term, 2012 

FAA-2012-12 

Filed On: June 6, 2013 [14399221 

ORDER 

Upon consideration of the stipulation for dismissal of this petition for review, it is 

ORDERED that the Clerk note on the docket that this case is dismissed. No 

mandate will issue. 

FOR THE COURT: 

Mark J. Langer, Clerk 

BY: /s/ 

Mark A. Butler 

Deputy Clerk 
USCA Case #12-1451 Document #1437739 Filed: 05/23/2013 Page 1 of 3 

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT 

Ventura Air Services, Inc., 

Petitioner, 

v. 

Federal Aviation Administration, 

Respondent. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Petition for Review 

DocketNo. 12-1451 

September Term, 2012 

FAA-2012-12 

----------~) 

STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 

Pursuant to the Rule 42(,b) of the Fe.~eral Rules of Appellate -I' ' , 

Procedure, the above-captioned parties, by and through undersigned counsel, 

hereby stipulate and agree to a voluntary dismissal of the docketed Petition 

for Review with prejudice. The parties further agree that each will bear its 

own costs and fees. 

DATED: Rockville, MD 

May 23,2013 Respectfully submitted, 

Gregory S. Winton Is/ 

Gregory S. Winton, Esq. 

(D.C. Bar #438670) 

One Research Court, Suite 450 

Rocl}ville, MD 20850 

Tel:(301) 294-8550 

Greg@aviationlawexperts.com 

COUNSEL FOR PETITIONER 
USCA Case #12-1451 Document #1437739 Filed: 05/23/2013 Page 2 of 3 

s/ Agnes M Rodriguez 

Agnes M. Rodriguez 

Attorney 

Federal Aviation Administration \' .,...:, 

Office of Chief Counsel, AGC-300 

800 Independence Ave., SW 

Washington, DC 20591 

Tel: 202-267-7268 

Fax: 202-267-5106 

rusnes .rodriguez@fa.a. gov 

COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT 

2 
USCA Case #12-1451 Document #1437739 Filed: 05/23/2013 Page 3 of 3 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that I have this date, May 23, 2013, sent via U.S. 

Mail, postage prepaid, one copy of the foregoing STIPULATION OF 

VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE addressed to: 

Agnes M. Rodriguez 

Attorney 

Federal Aviation Administration ' 

Office of Chief Counsel, AGC-300 

800 Independence Ave., SW 

Washington, DC 20591 

Gregory S. Winton Is/ 

Gregory S. Winton, Esq. 

(D.C. Bar #438670) 

3
January 6, 1939

No. 40361.

#### Protest 928610-G of D. H. Armaghanian.

Abstract 39919. Application by Government for rehearing denied.
#### Spartan Industrial Corp. *v.*United States

No. 7628.

Entry No. 757484.

— Invoice dated Galt, Ontario, Canada, December 10, 1946.

Certified December 10, 1946.

Entered at New York, N. Y., December 27, 1946.

(Decided November 23, 1948)

*John D. Rode*for the plaintiff.

*David N. Edelstein,*Assistant Attorney General *(Daniel I. Auster,*special attorney), for the defendant.

Mollison, Judge:

When this appeal for reappraisement was called for trial counsel for the plaintiff made the following offer:

Mb. Rode: I offer to stipulate in this case with counsel for the Government that on or about December 20, 1946, which is the date of exportation of the involved merchandise, vinyl resin, that the market value or the price at which such or similar vinyl resin was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of Canada for exportation to the United States, including the cost of all containers and coverings, and in the usual wholesale quantities in the ordinary course of trade, was 87 cents per pound, and that there was no higher foreign value at that time.

and the said offer was accepted by counsel for the Government and the stipulation entered into.

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such value was 87 cents per pound.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
40–704 

NOTICE: In lieu of a star print, errata are printed to indicate corrections to the original report. 

Calendar No. 563 

110TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! SENATE 2d Session 110–259 

ERRATA 

JANUARY 24, 2008.—Ordered to be printed 

Mr. LEAHY, from the Committee on the Judiciary, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

together with 

ADDITIONAL AND MINORITY VIEWS 

[To accompany S. 1145] 

CORRECTION 

On page 74, the heading was incorrectly printed. The name of 

Senator Specter should be stricken from the heading listing senators with ‘‘Minority Views’’. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with REPORTS