alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
EXTRACTED FROM UNISOURCE ENERGY CORPORATION'S FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS AS OF SEPTEMBER 30,2000 AND FOR THE NINE-MONTHS
ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000941138
<NAME> UNISOURCE ENERGY CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                    1,712,637
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                    120,500
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         324,852
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                       446,521
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,604,510
<COMMON>                                       642,703
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                            0
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                          (294,528)
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 348,175
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                         1,132,395
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                    1,725
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                    852,665
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                25,914
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 243,636
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                2,604,510
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      757,454
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                             4,238
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     608,781
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     613,019
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        144,435
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                               8,998
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 153,433
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       125,293
<NET-INCOME>                                    28,140
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                          0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   28,140
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                         2,595
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                            0
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         134,169
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .87
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .86





</TABLE>
|EXHIBIT 32.2
|------------

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of United-Guardian, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert S. Rubinger, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, to the best of my knowledge and belief, and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|Date: August 12, 2008 | By:/s/ Robert S. RubingerRobert S. Rubinger 
      Chief Financial Officer
|--------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to United-Guardian, Inc. and will be retained by United-Guardian, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.

---
Aggregate Risk and Hazard QuotientResults Landfill PetitionedWaste Aggreagate Non-carcinogenic Hazard Petitioned WasteAggregate Carcinogenic Risk Groundwater Surface Pathway Pathway Total Groundwater Surface Aggregate Aggregate Aggregate Pathway Pathway Total Hazard Hazard Hazard Aggregate Aggregate Aggregate Chemical Name Quotient Quotient Quotient Risk Cancer Risk Risk Acetone (2-propanone) 5.25E-07 4.34E-1 I 5.25E-07 Antimony I.05E-05 3.45E-08 1 .05E-05 Arsenic 4.99E-06 2.1OE-07 5.20E-06 1 .20E-09 4.78E-1 I 1 .25E-09 Barium 2.90E-06 3.33E-07 3.23E-06 Benzene 2.74E-06 4.09E-11 2.74E-06 2.87E-1O 3.95E-15 2.87E-1O Benzo(b)fluoranthene 5.92E-1 3 1 .38E-10 1 .39E-10 Benzoic acid 1 .35E-09 1 .04E-1 1 1 .36E-09 Beryllium 6.98E-06 6.58E-08 7.05E-06 1 .49E-12 1 .49E-12 Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate 2.30E-35 7.57E-10 7.57E-10 1.57E-39 3.76E-14 3.76E-14 Cadmium 1.05E-04 4.38E-06 1.09E-04 3.65E-11 3.65E-I1 Carbon disulfide 4.06E-07 1.44E-11 4.06E-07 Carbontetrachloride 6.03E-06 3.08E-10 6.03E-06 3.77E-10 3.11E-14 3.77E-10 Chloroform 8.06E-07 7.80E-11 8.06E-07 3.33E-10 7.47E-14 3.33E-10 Chromium 4.03E-05 3.86E-07 4.07E-05 3.44E-09 3.44E-09 Cobalt 2.85E-04 1.02E-06 2.86E-04 2.64E-11 2.64E-l1 Copper 2.60E-02 7.39E-06 2.60E-02 Cresol m- 7.78E-08 7.96E-10 7.86E-08 Cyanide 1.1 8E-06 1 .54E-09 1.1 8E-06 Dichloroethane 1,2- 2.68E-07 8.31E-12 2.68E-07 5.35E-1O 421 E-14 5.35E-10 Dichloroethylene 1,1

- 3.17E-07 1.16E-10 3.17E-07 Dichloroethylene cis-12- 2.26E-06 1.12E-11 2.26E-06 Diethyl phthalate 7.54E-09 7.1IE-11 7.61E-09 Diphenylamine 2.58E-06 9.35E-09 2.59E-06 Fluoranthene 1 .OOE-06 2.81 E-07 I.28E-06 Fluoride 5.16E-03 6.84E-08 5.16E-03 Hexanone2- 9.77E-08 1.12E-12 9.77E-08 Lead Mercury (Fish Pathway Only) 1 .44E-03 1 .44E-03 Mercury (Total) 7.37E-07 4.87E-08 7.86E-07 Methyl ethyl ketone 3.50E-08 2.06E-12 3.50E-08 Methylnaphthalene 1- 1.35E-06 3.71E-09 1.35E-06 7.14E-1l 9.43E-14 7.15E-11 Methylnaphthalene2- 4.54E-06 6.49E-09 4.55E-06 Nickel 2.05E-04 8.68E-08 2.05E-04 3.23E-11 3.23E-11 Nitroaniline4- 1 .85E-06 1 .42E-08 1 .86E-06 5.74E-1 I I.50E-l3 5.76E-1 1 Polychlorinated biphenyls (Aroclors) 4.92E-14 1.24E-02 1.24E-02 3.70E-19 1.98E-07 1.98E-07 Pyrene 3.04E-06 2.47E-08 3.06E-06 Selenium 4.01 E-07 2.43E-09 4.03E-07Silver 4.43E-06 6.OOE-07 5.03E-06 Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) 2,3,78- 2.85E-19 3.41E-08 3.41E-08 Tetrachloroethylene 5.36E-06 1 .32E-09 5.36E-06 5.53E-09 1 .91E-12 5.53E-09 Thallium 1.19E-04 1.37E-05 1.33E-04 Tin 3.98E-13 2.64E-09 2.64E-09 Trichloroethane 1,1,1

- 1.73E-12 1 .46E-12 3.19E-12 Trichloroethylene(Trichloroethylene 1,1,2-) 2.40E-04 5.OOE-08 2.40E-04 4.83E-1O 1.79E-13 4.83E-1O Trichlorofluoromethane(Freon 11) 8.93E-08 2.56E-1 0 8.96E-08 Trimethylbenzene 1,2,4 1 .62E-05 2.24E-1 1 1 .62E-05 Vanadium 6.41E-06 1.12E-08 6.42E-06 Xylenes (total) 2.51E-07 6.78E-12 2.51E-07 Zinc 9.19E-06 1.46E-07 9.34E-06

All Constituents Excluding Non-detects 3.22E-02 1 .39E-02 4.61E-02 8.87E-09 2.36E-07 2.45E-07

All Constituents Including Non-detects 3.22E-02 1 .39E-02 4.61E-02 8.87E-09 2.36E-07 2.45E-07

Hazard and Risk shaded in yellowwere calculated using detection levels
May 27, 1953

A. R. D. 26.

#### *United States*v. *American Agar & Chemical Co.*

REHEARING MOTION GRANTED

Entered at San Ysidro, Calif. A. R. D. 19. Motion by appellee.
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Regency
Affiliates, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Laurence S. Levy, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as
      of the dates presented and the consolidated result of operations of the
      Company for the periods presented.

Dated: November 14, 2005


/s/ Laurence S. Levy
-------------------------------------
Laurence S. Levy
President and Chief Executive Officer
No. 54232.

#### A. P. I., Ltd. *v.*United States,

protest 150537-K (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

The protest was dismissed.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

MATTHEW CRAIG,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D15-706 

[July 29, 2015]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Samantha Feuer, 

Judge; L.T. Case No. 50-2009-CF-012402-AXXXMB.

Matthew Craig, Wewahitchka, pro se. 

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Smith v. State, 40 Fla. L. Weekly D738 (Fla. 4th DCA 

March 25, 2015). 

CIKLIN, C.J., LEVINE and FORST, JJ., concur. 

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In Connection with the Quarterly Report of Tower Properties Company (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Stanley
J. Weber, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
          15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

/s/ Stanley J. Weber
--------------------
Stanley J. Weber
Chief Financial Officer
May 14, 2004

                                       23
### Clean CMAS Preamble w/o Headers **Nick Parsons** to: Cortney_Higgins 12/01/2011 11:47 AM Cc: Paul Versace, Penny Lassiter, JohnB Chamberlin Cortney, Attached is a clean version of the CMAS preamble with the unnecessary headers removed.

EO12866_CMAS_2060-AQ89_Reconsideration_Proposal20110614_Interagency Comments Under EOs 12866 and 13563 EPA 120111 clean.doc
March 15, 1971

No. 71-11

#### Paul P. Dunn, CWO, U. S. Air Force (Ret.) v COL John F. Skaggs, Jr., Commander, TUSLOG Detachment 118, Izmir Common Defense Installation, Turkey, et al.

(J. DARDEN would dismiss the Petition solely because the relief requested is not in aid of this Court’s jurisdiction.)
# C_2016260EN.01003601.xml

| 18.7.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 260/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.7.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 260/36

---

Order of the President of the Court of 16 March 2016 — European Commission v Republic of Poland

(Case C-545/15) (1)

1

(2016/C 260/44)

Language of the case: Polish

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 16, 18.1.2016.

1

---
# C_2017144EN.01000502.xml

| 8.5.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 144/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.5.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 144/5

---

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 7 March 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Trybunał Konstytucyjny w Warszawie — Poland) — proceedings brought by the Rzecznik Praw Obywatelskich (RPO)

(Case C-390/15) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Taxation - Value added tax (VAT) - Directive 2006/112/EC - Point 6 of Annex III - Validity - Procedure - Amendment of a proposal for a Council directive after the Parliament has given an opinion - No fresh consultation of the Parliament - Article 98(2) - Validity - Reduced rate of VAT precluded from being applied to the supply of digital books electronically - Principle of equal treatment - Comparability of two situations - Supply of digital books electronically and on all physical means of support))

(2017/C 144/06)

Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Referring court

Trybunał Konstytucyjny w Warszawie

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Rzecznik Praw Obywatelskich (RPO)

Applicant:

Other parties: Marszałek Sejmu Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej, Prokurator Generalny

Other parties:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Examination of the questions referred for a preliminary ruling has disclosed no factor of such a kind as to affect the validity of point 6 of Annex III to Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax, as amended by Council Directive 2009/47/EC of 5 May 2009, or of Article 98(2) of that directive, read in conjunction with point 6 of Annex III thereto.

---

(1)  OJ C 346, 19.10.2015.

1

---
AO 450 (Rev. 5/85) Judgment in a Civil Case

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

Eastern Division 

SHAWN BUONI,

Petitioner,

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE

v.

WARDEN, CHILLICOTHE CASE NO. 2:12-CV-1147

CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, JUDGE EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR.

MAGISTRATE JUDGE NORAH MCCANN KING

Respondent.

Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues have

been tried and the jury has rendered its verdict.

Decision by Court. A decision has been rendered by the Court without a hearing or trial.

Pursuant to the ORDER filed August 27, 2013, JUDGMENT is hereby entered

DISMISSING this action.

Date: August 27, 2013 JOHN P. HEHMAN, CLERK

/S/ Andy F. Quisumbing 

(By) Andy F. Quisumbing

 Courtroom Deputy Clerk

Case: 2:12-cv-01147-EAS-NMK Doc #: 18 Filed: 08/27/13 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Q

Department 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
Troneeoranen of GENERAL COUNSEL Washington, 020590.
Office of the Secretary
of Transportation

49 CFR 37.42(c); 49 CFR 27. 7(b)(2) 5/24/12
QUESTION:

WHAT ARE THE OBLIGATIONS OF 4 PUBLIC ENTITY RECEIVING FEDERAL
FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE THAT OWNS AND ( ONTROLS TRACK THROUGH 4
STATION?

ANSWER:

¢ Under 49 CFR section 37.42(c), when a new or altered platform is adjacent to a track shared
with existing freight operations, the railroad providing passenger service, and other
responsible parties, can either provide level boarding or ensure nondiscriminatory service to
persons with disabilities by other means, such as car-borne lifts.

¢ When such a track is owned and controlled by a public entity receiving Federal financial
assistance, such as Amtrak, a commuter authority, or a state or local agency, the recipient’s
obligation under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 also must be a consideration.

¢ Under the Department's Section 504 rules (49 CFR section 27.7(b)(2)), public entities must
provide persons with disabilities “equal opportunity to obtain the same result, to gain the
same benefit, or to reach the same level of achievement, in the most integrated setting that is
reasonably achievable.”

¢ The Department has long held that level-entry boarding provides passenger rail service in the
most integrated setting reasonably achievable to persons with disabilities who are unable to
climb steps.

¢ Consequently, even though section 37.42(c) provides discretion to provide access to rail cars
through level boarding or other means when a track adjacent to a new or altered platform is
shared with freight rail operations, recipients that own and control the track have an
obligation under Section 504 to use that discretion to provide level boarding.

The General Counsel of the Department of Transportation has reviewed this document and
approved it as consistent with the language and intent of 49 CFR Parts 27 and 37.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 24, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 05-20442

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

TONY CHRISTOPHER MEJIA,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:04-CR-528-ALL

--------------------

Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Tony Christopher

Mejia raises arguments that are foreclosed by United States v.

Daugherty, 264 F.3d 513, 518 (5th Cir. 2001), which rejected a

Commerce Clause challenge to the felon-in-possession-of-a-firearm

statute, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g). The Government’s motion for summary

affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.
|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  May 5, 2010 | /s/ MICHAEL E. BATTEN                |
|------------------------------|--------------------------------------|
|                         | Michael E. Batten                    |
|                         | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |

----
**Certification of the Chief Financial OfficerPursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)**

                   I, Frederic F. Brace, the Executive Vice President and Chief FinancialOfficer of United Air Lines, Inc. (the "Company") certify that to the bestof my knowledge, based upon a review of the quarterly report on Form 10-Qfor the period ended June 30, 2005 of the Company (the "Report"):(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operationsof the Company.    /s/ Frederic F. Brace________Frederic F. BraceUnited Air Lines. Inc.Executive Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerAugust 12, 2005
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 00-40215

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

VICENTE CABALLERO-RODRIGUEZ,

also known as Antonio D. Toribio,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. B-99-CR-409-1

--------------------

October 19, 2000

Before SMITH, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

 The federal public defender appointed to represent Vicente

Caballero-Rodriguez has filed a motion to withdraw and a brief as

required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). 

Caballero-Rodriguez has not filed a response. 

 Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses

no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw

is GRANTED. Counsel is excused from further responsibilities
No. 00-40215

- 2 -

herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
**Exhibit 32.1**

CERTIFICATION OFCEO PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Trinity CapitalCorporation, a New Mexico corporation (the “Company”), for the period endedJune 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), William C. Enloe, as President and ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)          TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)          Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| /s/ William C. Enloe                  |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|
| William C. Enloe                      |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |
| August 9, 2006                        |

 

 

----
### Summary of Analy tical Results 662 - February

2012

**Sample ID** 662-GRAB 662-GRAB 662-GRAB 662-GRAB **Date** 2/6/12 2/13/12 2/20/12 2/27/12 **Top (ft)** 0 0 0 0 **Total (T)/ Bottom (ft)**  0 0 0 0 **An aly**  **te units**  **Diss. (D) Duplicate #**  1 1 1 1 PFOA ug/L T 2.02 2.14 NQ (<2.00) NQ (<2.00)

ug/L = micrograms per liter or parts per billion (ppb) ND = not detected (shown as <LOD) NQ = not quantifiable (shown as <LOQ) ND<LOD<NQ<LOQ LOD - limit of detection LOQ = limit of quantification

Samples were analyzed by Critical Path Services LLC. Reported results represent a single analysis, except for the sample collected on 2/13/12. Acceptable precision was obtained and the reported result for the sample collected on 2/13/12 represents the average of lab duplicate results.

The result shown for the sample collected on 2/6/12 is the result from a reanalysis (extract reinjection) performed by the lab as additional quality control (QC). The initial analysis result for the sample collected on 2/6/12 was NQ (<2.00).

The NJDEP lab certification number for Critical Path Services LLC is PA072. PFOA = Perfluorooctanoic Acid ug/L = micrograms per Liter

< and ND = Non detect at stated reporting limit Page 1 of 1 090000648104790a.xls:Sheet1 6/14/2012 3:42 PM
Exhibit 4.1



 


		CAPELOGIC INCORPORATED

Providing Technology Solutions for Financial Services


1 Windhaven Court, Monroe Twp,
NJ 08831 


Telephone: (609) 448-7930 Fax: (973)
206-9430 


Web: www.capelogic.com


 


April 20, 2022


 


Advisors Asset Management, Inc.


8100 E. 22nd St. North, Building 800


Suite 102


Wichita, KS 67226


 


Re: Advisors Disciplined Trust 2109 (the “Fund”)


Ladies and Gentlemen:


We have examined the Registration
Statement File No. 333-262222 for the above captioned Fund and acknowledge that Capelogic, Inc. is currently acting as the independent
pricing agent for the Fund. Subsequently, we hereby consent to the reference of Capelogic, Inc. as independent pricing agent.


You are hereby authorized
to file a copy of this letter with the Securities and Exchange Commission.


 


	 	Sincerely,
	 	 	 
	 	Capelogic, Inc.
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	By	/s/ SALMAN AHMAD
	 	 	Salman Ahmad
	 	 	Treasurer