alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 533 

Commemorating the 60th anniversary of the permanent integration of 

professional football by 4 pioneering players. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 17, 2006 

Mr. VOINOVICH (for himself, Mr. DEWINE, and Mr. ALLEN) submitted the 

following resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Commemorating the 60th anniversary of the permanent 

integration of professional football by 4 pioneering players. 

Whereas the integration of sports supported other ongoing efforts to permanently end racial segregation as an accepted practice in the United States; 

Whereas, in 1946, 4 African-American football players, William ‘‘Bill’’ K. Willis and Marion Motley, who played for 

the Cleveland Browns, and Kenny Washington and 

Woody Strode, who played for the Los Angeles Rams, all 

signed contracts to play professional football; 

Whereas, on August 7, 1946, Bill Willis was the first of this 

pioneering foursome to sign a contract to play professional football for the Cleveland Browns forever ending 

the race barrier in professional football, 1 full year before 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 533 ATS 

Jackie Robinson broke the race barrier in professional 

baseball; 

Whereas, thanks to the significant contributions of Bill Willis 

and Marion Motley, the Cleveland Browns won the National Football League (NFL) Championship in 1950 

which was the first year the Cleveland Browns played in 

the NFL; 

Whereas, in addition to permanently ending the race barrier 

in professional football, Bill Willis and Marion Motley 

were recognized for their outstanding professional football careers by their election to the Pro Football Hall of 

Fame; and 

Whereas 2006 marks the 60th anniversary of the permanent 

integration of professional football, and the NFL will 

commemorate this milestone during the 2006 Pro Football Hall of Fame Game: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) recognizes the 60th anniversary of the per3 manent integration of professional football; and 

4 (2) respectfully requests the Secretary of the 

5 Senate to transmit for appropriate display an en6 rolled copy of this resolution to— 

7 (A) the Pro Football Hall of Fame in Can8 ton, Ohio; and 

9 (B) William K. Willis, the only surviving 

10 member of the pioneering foursome who permaVerDate Aug 31 2005 00:38 Jul 19, 2006 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\SR533.ATS SR533

ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
3 

•SRES 533 ATS 

1 nently ended the race barrier in professional 

2 football. 

Æ 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
# Official Journal C 233A/16 J

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 233A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6516 June 2022 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 233A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6516 June 2022

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) |
| 2022/C 233 A/01 | Notice of open competition – EPSO/AD/400/22 – Administrators (AD 7) and experts (AD 9) in the fields of defence industry and space | 1 |

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO)

2022/C 233 A/01

Notice of open competition – EPSO/AD/400/22 – Administrators (AD 7) and experts (AD 9) in the fields of defence industry and space

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

MICKEY DWAYNE SAMUEL,

Petitioner,

vs. Case No.: 2:13-cv-076

JUDGE SMITH

Magistrate Judge King

SOUTHERN OHIO CORRECTIONAL 

FACILITY,

Respondent.

ORDER

On March 31, 2014, the United States Magistrate Judge issued a Report and

Recommendation recommending that the case be dismissed. (See Doc. 10). The parties were

specifically advised of their right to object to the Report and Recommendation and of the

consequences of their failure to do so. There has nevertheless been no objection to the Report

and Recommendation.

The Report and Recommendation is hereby ADOPTED and AFFIRMED. Petitioner’s 

case is hereby DISMISSED as procedurally defaulted. 

The Clerk shall remove Document 10 from the Court’s pending motions list.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/ George C. Smith 

GEORGE C. SMITH, JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case: 2:13-cv-00076-GCS-NMK Doc #: 12 Filed: 04/23/14 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 11


                        COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                      Quarter Ended          Nine Months Ended
                                      September 30,             September 30,
                                  --------------------      --------------------
                                    1996        1995         1996        1995
                                    ----        ----         ----        ----
<S>        <C>                 <C>         <C>           <C>         <C>     
Net Income ($000)                 $14,353     $129,746      $90,995     $367,904


Weighted Average Common
  Shares Outstanding           69,421,132   70,199,410   69,164,387   70,104,025


Earnings Per Share                  $0.21        $1.85        $1.32        $5.25


Weighted Average Common
  Shares Outstanding
  Including Common Stock
  Equivalents - Primary Basis  69,784,214   70,968,515   69,568,382   70,702,533


Primary Earnings Per Share          $0.21        $1.83        $1.31        $5.20


Weighted Average Common
  Shares Outstanding
  Including Common Stock
  Equivalents - Fully
  Diluted Basis                69,784,214   70,985,037   69,568,382   70,889,652


Fully Diluted Earnings Per Share    $0.21        $1.83        $1.31        $5.19

</TABLE>


<PAGE>
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Union Tank Car Company (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
period ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mark J. Garrette, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In witness whereof, I have executed this certification as of the 9thday of August, 2007.



/s/ Mark J. GarretteMark J. GarrettePrincipal Financial Officer
#### Marks & Rosenfeld, Inc. *v.*United States

No. 7587.

Entry Nos. 709720; 713796; 702990.

Invoices dated Hanley, England, July 1945, etc.

Certified July 1945, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., September 7, 1945, etc.

*441(Decided May 5, 1948)

*Siegel, Mandell & Davidson (Sidney Mandell*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Johnson, Judge:

This proceeding has been submitted upon a stipulation wherein the parties hereto have agreed that the issues involved in the^e reappraise-ments are the same in all material respects as in the case of *United States*v. *Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp.,*33 C. C. P. A. 183, C. A. D. 334. The record in that case was admitted as part of the record herein.

In view of the aforesaid stipulation and accepting same as a statement of fact, and in view of the decision cited, I find and hold that the export values of the merchandise are the values found by the appraiser, less any additions on entry by the importer by reason of advances by the appraiser in similar eases to equal the so-called British purchase tax.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
(logo) **Deutsche Bank**

 

1761 East St. Andrew Place

Santa Ana, CA92705-4934

 

Tel 714 247 6000

Fax 714 247 6009 

 

 

ANNUAL STATEMENT AS TOCOMPLIANCE

 

COMM 2016-787S Mortgage Trust

 

The undersigned, David Co, aDirector of Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as the CertificateAdministrator (a "Certifying Servicer") under the Trust and ServicingAgreement, dated as of March 1, 2016 (the "Agreement"), by and among,Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation, as Depositor, Wells FargoBank, National Association, as Master Servicer and Special Servicer, WilmingtonTrust, National Association, as Trustee, and Deutsche Bank Trust CompanyAmericas, as Certificate Administrator, Paying Agent, and Custodian, here bycertifies in accordance with Section 11.07 of the Agreement :

 

A) A review of such CertifyingServicer's activities from March 1, 2016 to December 31, 2016 (the"reporting period") and of such Certifying Servicer's performanceunder the Agreement has been made under such officer's supervision and

B) That, as to the best ofsuch officer's knowledge, based on such review, such Certifying Servicer hasfulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement, in all material respectsthroughout the reporting period.

 

DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANYAMERICAS

as Certificate Administrator

 

/s/ David Co

BY: David Co

Title: Director

Date: March 1, 2017
##### 



EXHIBIT 32
  Certification by the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
Relating to a Periodic Report Containing Financial Statements
   (1)
    
    The Companys periodic report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007
(the Form 10-Q) fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 (2)
    
    The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
    
    CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER/s/ David W. Trego
    
    /s/ John C. BarneyDavid W. Trego
    
    John C. BarneyDate: May 10, 2007
    
    Date: May 10, 2007
WEST VIRGINIA ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY DOCUMENT LIST


WEST VIRGINIA ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

DOCUMENT LIST

 

Loans:$1,845,000 Real Estate Term Loan 

$   765,000 Equipment Term Loan

 

Lender:West Virginia Economic Development Authority (“WVEDA”) 

 

Borrowers:Kronos Advanced Technologies, Inc. (“Kronos”) 

Kronos Advanced Technologies WV, Inc. (“Kronos WV”) 

 

Closing Date:April 7, 2022 

_____________________________________________________________________________________

 

LOAN DOCUMENTS

1.Loan Agreement between WVEDA and Borrowers 

 

2.Promissory Notes: 

a.     Promissory Note (Real Estate Loan) made by Borrowers and payable to WVEDA

b.     Promissory Note (Equipment Loan) made by Borrowers and payable to WVEDA

 

3.Credit Line Deed of Trust and Fixture Filing granted by Kronos WV to Joyce F. Ofsa, as Trustee, for the benefit of WVEDA 

 

4.Security Agreement between Kronos WV and WVEDA 

 

5.UCC Financing Statements filed with West Virginia Secretary of State: 

a.     Real Estate Loan

b.     Equipment Loan

 

6.Certificate of Completion, Equity Injection and Sources and Uses of Funds 

 

7.Legal Opinion of Counsel to Borrowers 

 

8.Secretary’s and Incumbency Certificate of Kronos, certifying as to: 

a.     Articles of Incorporation, with all amendments

b.     Bylaws

c.     Authorizing Resolutions

 

9.Secretary’s and Incumbency Certificate of Kronos WV, certifying as to: 

a.     Articles of Incorporation

b.     Bylaws

c.     Authorizing Resolutions

10.Insurance Certificates: 

 

a.     Certificate of General Liability Coverage





b.     Certificate of Property Insurance Coverage

c.     Certificate of Flood Insurance Coverage or Evidence that Property is outside

        100-Year Flood Plain

 

11.Evidence of Workers’ Compensation Insurance for Kronos WV 

 

12.Certificate of Compliance for Unemployment Coverage from Workforce West Virginia for 

Kronos WV

 

13.Certificate of Existence/Good Standing issued by Nevada Secretary of State (Kronos) 

 

14.Certificate of Authorization issued by West Virginia Secretary of State (Kronos) 

 

15.Certificate of Existence issued by West Virginia Secretary of State (Kronos WV) 

 

16.Title Insurance Commitment 

 

17.Title Insurance Policy 

 

18.Survey 

 

19.   Certificate of Independent Engineer or Architect 

 

20.UCC Lien Searches: 

a.Nevada Secretary of State (Kronos) 

b.West Virginia Secretary of State (GX7 Limited Partnership and Kronos WV) 

 

21.Project Invoices 

 

22.Copy of Vesting Deed 

 

23.Memorandum of Sale and Loan Disbursement Statement 

14663509

(1916.0939)


2
# C_2016027EN.01000901.xml

| 25.1.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 27/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.1.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 27/9

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Kúria (Hungary) lodged on 20 October 2015 — Interservice d.o.o. Koper v Sándor Horváth

(Case C-547/15)

(2016/C 027/11)

Language of the case: Hungarian

Referring court

Referring court

Kúria

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Interservice d.o.o. Koper

Applicant:

Defendant: Sándor Horváth

Defendant:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Must Article 96(2) of Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 (1) establishing the Community Customs Code be interpreted as meaning that not only the person who enters into a transport agreement with the seller for the transport of the goods (the contractual or main carrier), but also the person who carries out the transport, in full or in part, on the basis of another transport agreement concluded with the contractual or main carrier (the transport subcontractor), is to be regarded as a carrier of the goods? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Must Article 96(2) of Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 (1) establishing the Community Customs Code be interpreted as meaning that not only the person who enters into a transport agreement with the seller for the transport of the goods (the contractual or main carrier), but also the person who carries out the transport, in full or in part, on the basis of another transport agreement concluded with the contractual or main carrier (the transport subcontractor), is to be regarded as a carrier of the goods?

1

| 2. | If the first question is answered in the affirmative, must Article 96(2) of Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 establishing the Community Customs Code be interpreted as meaning that, in a case such as that in the main proceedings, the transport subcontractor is required, before continuing the transport of the goods, to ensure in a satisfactory manner that the main carrier actually produced the goods at the customs office of destination in the manner prescribed? |
| --- | --- |

2.

If the first question is answered in the affirmative, must Article 96(2) of Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 establishing the Community Customs Code be interpreted as meaning that, in a case such as that in the main proceedings, the transport subcontractor is required, before continuing the transport of the goods, to ensure in a satisfactory manner that the main carrier actually produced the goods at the customs office of destination in the manner prescribed?

---

(1)  Corrigendum to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 of 12 October 1992 establishing the Community Customs Code (OJ 1992 L 302) (OJ 2014 L 367, p. 126).

1

---
# C_2023237EN.01000201.xml

| 5.7.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 237/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.7.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 237/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.11140 – APG / CORSICA SOLE / MIROVA / DRIVECO)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 237/02)

On 26 June 2023, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32023M11140. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32023M11140. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
J. 

oath that he read, understood, and signed the written plea agreement; 

understood his rights and voluntarily waived them; and understood the 

nature of the charges against him, the associated penalties, and the 

consequences of pleading guilty. The district court further found that 

Hernandez's testimony at the hearing on his motion was incredible; 

Hernandez did not met his burden to show that the guilty plea was 

invalid; and the totality of the circumstances demonstrated that 

Hernandez entered his plea intelligently, knowingly, and voluntarily. 

The record on appeal supports the district court's factual 

findings, and we conclude that Hernandez has failed to demonstrate that 

the district court abused its discretion by denying his presentence motion 

to withdraw his guilty plea. See id. (defendant bears the burden of 

proving that his plea is invalid). Accordingly, we 

ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED. 

cc: Hon. Richard Wagner, District Judge 

Pershing County Public Defender 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Pershing County District Attorney 

Pershing County Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A 

2
# C_2016260EN.01001401.xml

| 18.7.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 260/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.7.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 260/14

---

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 25 February 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato — Italy) — Associazione Italiana delle Unità Dedicate Autonome Private di Day Surgery e dei Centri di Chirurgia Ambulatoriale (Aiudapds) v Agenzia Italiana del Farmaco (AIFA), Ministero della Salute

(Case C-520/15) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Rules of Procedure of the Court - Article 53(2) - Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Second paragraph of Article 47 and Article 54 - European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms - Article 6(1) - Extraordinary petition the President of the Italian Republic - Opposition to the petition by a party to the dispute - Modification of that extraordinary petition into judicial proceedings - Implementation of EU law - Absence - Manifest lack of jurisdiction of the Court of Justice))

(2016/C 260/18)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Referring court

Consiglio di Stato — Italy

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Associazione Italiana delle Unità Dedicate Autonome Private di Day Surgery e dei Centri di Chirurgia Ambulatoriale (Aiudapds)

Applicant:

Defendant: Agenzia Italiana del Farmaco (AIFA), Ministero della Salute

Defendant:

Other party: Roche SpA, Novartis Farma SpA, and Regione Marche

Other party:

Re:

Re:

The Court of Justice of the European Union clearly has no jurisdiction to answer the question referred by the Consiglio di Stato (Council of State, Italy) by decision of 15 July 2015 (Case C-520/15).

---

(1)  OJ C 398, 30.11.2015.

1

---
**Certification of the Principal Financial OfficerPursuant to 15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)(Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)**

I, Frederic F. Brace, the Executive Vice President and Chief FinancialOfficer of United Air Lines, Inc. (the "Company"), certify that:(1)     I have reviewed this quarterly reporton Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 of the Company;
(2)     Based on my knowledge, this report doesnot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;
(3)     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,and other financial information included in this report, fairly presentin all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented inthis report;
(4)     The Company's other certifying officer andI are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controlsand procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))for the Company and we have: (a)     Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis report is being prepared;
(b)     Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company'sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as ofthe end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;and
(c)     Disclosed in this report any change in theCompany's internal control over financial reporting that occurred duringthe Company's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected,or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal controlover financial reporting; and (5)     The Company's other certifying officer andI have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the Company's auditors and the audit committeeof Company's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): (a)     All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Company'sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and
(b)     Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theCompany's internal control over financial reporting.   /s/ Frederic F. BraceFrederic F. BraceUnited Air Lines, Inc.Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
November 8, 2004