alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.2**I, Joseph F. Spanier, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Breeze-Eastern Corporation;     2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this quarterly report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, resultsof operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisquarterly report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:          (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;          (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;          (c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):          (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;          (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date: February 6, 2008 /s/  Joseph F. Spanier   Joseph F. Spanier   Chief Financial Officer  
32
|   | EXHIBIT      31.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY      ACT |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                            |                                                                       |                               |
|---------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------|
|                            | UNITED      MORTGAGE TRUST                                                 |
|                       |                                                                  |                          |
| Date: August      14, 2008 | By                                                               | /s/ Christine      A. Griffin |
|                            | President ,      Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial  Officer |
# C_2015406EN.01002001.xml

| 7.12.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 406/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.12.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 406/20

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione (Italy) lodged on 21 September 2015 — Agenzia delle Entrate v Marco Identi

(Case C-493/15)

(2015/C 406/20)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Corte suprema di cassazione

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Agenzia delle Entrate

Respondent: Marco Identi

Question referred

Must Article 4(3) TEU and Articles 2 and 22 of Sixth Directive 77/388 (1) on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes be interpreted as precluding the application, in relation to value added tax, of a provision of national law which provides for the extinguishment of debts arising from VAT in favour of taxable persons admitted to the bankruptcy discharge procedure governed by Articles 142 and 143 of Royal Decree No 267/1942?

---

(1)  Sixth Council Directive of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment (OJ 1977 L 145, p. 1).

---
No. 40341.

#### Protests 835152-G, etc., of Hollander Bead & Novelty Corp. (New York).

Opinion by

Sullivan, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of wooden beads similar to those the subject of Abstract 38617. The claim at 35 percent under paragraph 1503 was therefore sustained.
# C_2016454EN.01000802.xml

| 5.12.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 454/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.12.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 454/8

---

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 8 September 2016 — Real Express SRL v European Union Intellectual Property Office, MIP Metro Group Intellectual Property GmbH & Co. KG

(Case C-309/15 P) (1)

((Appeal - Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - EU trade mark - Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Blue and red figurative mark containing the word element ‘real’ - Opposition of the proprietor of the black and white national figurative marks containing the word elements ‘Real’ and ‘Real mark’ - Rejection of the opposition))

(2016/C 454/17)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: Real Express SRL (represented by: C. Anitoae, avocată)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Botis and D. Hanf, Agents), MIP Metro Group Intellectual Property GmbH & Co. KG (represented by: J.-C. Plate and R. Kaase, Rechtsanwälte)

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

| 2. | Real Express SRL shall bear its own costs and pay the costs of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) and of MIP Metro Group Intellectual Property GmbH & Co. KG. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Real Express SRL shall bear its own costs and pay the costs of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) and of MIP Metro Group Intellectual Property GmbH & Co. KG.

---

(1)  OJ C 398, 30.11.2015.

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0623

STATE OF MONTANA,

 Plaintiff and Appellee,

 v.

BRANDON JEROME LAMBRIGHT,

 Defendant and Appellant,

 

 ORDER

Upon consideration of counsel’s motion to withdraw as 

counsel of record, and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Defendant and 

Appellant in this matter shall file a response to this motion 

within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. The response 

must be served upon all counsel of record, including the Attorney 

General, the County Attorney, and the Appellant’s counsel.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court 

give notice of this Order by mail to all counsel of record and to 

the Defendant and Appellant at his last known address. 

Electronically signed by:

Beth Baker

Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 15 2023

05/15/2023

Case Number: DA 21-0623
From: Frey, Nathan J. <Nathan_J._Frey@omb.eop.gov> 

Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2015 2:57 PM 

To: Culligan, Kevin; Harvey, Reid 

Cc: Vasu, Amy; Szabo, Aaron 

Subject: Summary of Interagency Comments Under EO 12866 and 13563 -- CPP draft final 

rule 

Attached please find data set submitted by interagency reviewers on the CPP draft final rule. 

 

Thanks and please let me know if you have any questions. 

Nathan 

<< SummaryofinteragencycommentsunderEO12866_13563_2060-AR33_7232015.docx.xlsx >>
# C_2017382EN.01000701.xml

| 13.11.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 382/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.11.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 382/7

---

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 19 September 2017 — European Commission v Ireland

(Case C-552/15) (1)

1

((Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Freedom to provide services - Motor vehicles - Rental or leasing of a motor vehicle by a resident of one Member State from a supplier established in another Member State - Registration tax - Payment of the full amount of tax at the time of registration - Conditions for refunding tax - Proportionality))

(2017/C 382/06)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: M. Wasmeier and J. Tomkin, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Ireland (represented by: L. Williams, E. Creedon and A. Joyce, acting as Agents, M. Collins SC, and S. Kingston and C. Daly, Barristers-at-Law)

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that, by imposing the obligation to pay in advance the full amount of the vehicle registration tax applicable in the event of permanent registration, whatever the actual limited duration of the proposed use in Ireland of a vehicle imported there, and although the temporary duration of the lease or rental has been determined precisely and is known in advance, Ireland has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 56 TFEU; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by imposing the obligation to pay in advance the full amount of the vehicle registration tax applicable in the event of permanent registration, whatever the actual limited duration of the proposed use in Ireland of a vehicle imported there, and although the temporary duration of the lease or rental has been determined precisely and is known in advance, Ireland has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 56 TFEU;

| 2. | Declares that, by failing to provide for the payment of interest when vehicle registration tax is refunded and by deducting the sum of EUR 500 by way of an administration charge from the amount of registration tax to be refunded, Ireland has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 56 TFEU; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Declares that, by failing to provide for the payment of interest when vehicle registration tax is refunded and by deducting the sum of EUR 500 by way of an administration charge from the amount of registration tax to be refunded, Ireland has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 56 TFEU;

| 3. | Orders Ireland to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Ireland to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 414, 14.12.2015.

1

---
### Eocene algae from Ishigaki-shima, Ryukyu-retto

By: J. H. Johnson

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp399C

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
# C_2016027EN.01001101.xml

| 25.1.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 27/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.1.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 27/11

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d'appel de Paris (France) lodged on 4 November 2015 — Carrefour Hypermarchés SAS v ITM Alimentaire International SASU

(Case C-562/15)

(2016/C 027/14)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Referring court

Cour d'appel de Paris

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Carrefour Hypermarchés SAS

Appellant:

Respondent: ITM Alimentaire International SASU

Respondent:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Whether Article 4(a) and (c) of Directive 2006/114/EC of 12 December 2006 (1) ..., which provides that ‘[c]omparative advertising shall ... be permitted when ... it is not misleading [and] it objectively compares one or more material, relevant, verifiable and representative features of those goods and services’, must be interpreted as meaning that a comparison of the price of goods sold by retail outlets is permitted only if the goods are sold in shops having the same format or of the same size; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Whether Article 4(a) and (c) of Directive 2006/114/EC of 12 December 2006 (1) ..., which provides that ‘[c]omparative advertising shall ... be permitted when ... it is not misleading [and] it objectively compares one or more material, relevant, verifiable and representative features of those goods and services’, must be interpreted as meaning that a comparison of the price of goods sold by retail outlets is permitted only if the goods are sold in shops having the same format or of the same size;

1

| 2. | Whether the fact that the shops whose prices are compared are of different sizes and formats constitutes material information within the meaning of Directive 2005/29/EC (2) that must necessarily be brought to the knowledge of the consumer; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Whether the fact that the shops whose prices are compared are of different sizes and formats constitutes material information within the meaning of Directive 2005/29/EC (2) that must necessarily be brought to the knowledge of the consumer;

2

| 3. | If so, to what degree and/or via what medium must that information be disseminated to the consumer? |
| --- | --- |

3.

If so, to what degree and/or via what medium must that information be disseminated to the consumer?

---

(1)  Directive 2006/114/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 concerning misleading and comparative advertising (OJ 2006 L 376, p. 21).

1

(2)  Directive 2005/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2005 concerning unfair business-to-consumer commercial practices in the internal market and amending Council Directive 84/450/EEC, Directives 97/7/EC, 98/27/EC and 2002/65/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council (‘Unfair Commercial Practices Directive’) (OJ 2005 L 149, p. 22).

2

---
**EXHIBIT32.2**

 

 

**CERTIFICATION**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to**

**Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002**

 

I, James H. Perry, as Chief Financial Officer of United IndustrialCorporation (the “Company”) certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to myknowledge:

 

a.               theaccompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30,2005 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”)fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

b.              theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date: August 5, 2005 |
|---------------------------|
|                      |
|                      |
| /s/ James H. Perry        |   |
| James H. Perry            |
| Chief Financial Officer   |

 

----
##### 



UGI UTILITIES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES  EXHIBIT 12.1
(Thousands of dollars)
 NineMonthsEndedJune 30,
    
    
    Year Ended September 30,2007
    
    
    2006
    
    
    2005
    
    
    2004
    
    
    2003
    
    
    2002Earnings:Earnings before income taxes
    
    $
    122,057
    
    
    $
    80,544
    
    
    $
    84,953
    
    
    $
    83,098
    
    
    $
    100,212
    
    
    $
    73,665Interest expense
    
    
    31,775
    
    
    
    24,102
    
    
    
    18,079
    
    
    
    17,698
    
    
    
    17,412
    
    
    
    16,365Amortization of debt discount and expense
    
    
    342
    
    
    
    243
    
    
    
    247
    
    
    
    233
    
    
    
    244
    
    
    
    287Estimated interest component of rental expense
    
    
    1,197
    
    
    
    1,675
    
    
    
    1,568
    
    
    
    1,477
    
    
    
    1,434
    
    
    
    1,563$
    155,371
    
    
    $
    106,564
    
    
    $
    104,847
    
    
    $
    102,506
    
    
    $
    119,302
    
    
    $
    91,880Fixed Charges:Interest expense
    
    $
    31,775
    
    
    $
    24,102
    
    
    $
    18,079
    
    
    $
    17,698
    
    
    $
    17,412
    
    
    $
    16,365Amortization of debt discount and expense
    
    
    342
    
    
    
    243
    
    
    
    247
    
    
    
    233
    
    
    
    244
    
    
    
    287Allowance for funds used during
construction (capitalized interest)
    
    
    117
    
    
    
    85
    
    
    
    22
    
    
    
    11
    
    
    
    7
    
    
    
    19Estimated interest component of rental expense
    
    
    1,197
    
    
    
    1,675
    
    
    
    1,568
    
    
    
    1,477
    
    
    
    1,434
    
    
    
    1,563$
    33,431
    
    
    $
    26,105
    
    
    $
    19,916
    
    
    $
    19,419
    
    
    $
    19,097
    
    
    $
    18,234Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
    
    
    4.65
    
    
    
    4.08
    
    
    
    5.26
    
    
    
    5.28
    
    
    
    6.25
    
    
    
    5.04
250 West 57th St. Associates L.L.C.
June 30, 2002



                                        EXHIBIT 99(1)

                250 West 57th St. Associates L.L.C.

                Chief Executive Officer Certification
                        Pursuant to Section 906
                 of Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002

	The undersigned Peter L. Malkin is signing this Chief
Executive Officer certification as a Member* of 250 West 57th St.
Associates L.L.C.("Registrant") to certify that:

(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Registrant for the
quarterly period ended June 30, 2002 (the "Report") fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.78m or
78o(d)); and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of Registrant.

Dated:  August 20, 2002

                                By /s/ Peter L. Malkin
                                Peter L. Malkin
                                Member of 250 West 57th St.
                                Associates L.L.C.




*Registrant's organizational documents do not provide for a Chief
Executive Officer or other officer with equivalent rights and
duties.  As described in the Quarterly Report, Registrant is a
limited liability company with two Members who act as agents for
investor participants.  Accordingly, this Chief Executive Officer
certification is being signed by the Member of Registrant with
the longest term of service.


250 West 57th St. Associates L.L.C.
June 30, 2002

                                        Exhibit 99(2)

                250 West 57th St. Associates L.L.C.

                Chief Financial Officer Certification
                        Pursuant to Section 906
                 of Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002

	The undersigned Stanley Katzman is signing this Chief
Financial Officer certification as a senior member of the
financial/accounting staff of Wien & Malkin LLP, the supervisor**
of 250 West 57th St. Associates L.L.C.("Registrant"), to certify
that:

(1)      the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Registrant for the
quarterly period ended June 30, 2002 (the "Report") fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934(15 U.S.C.78m or 78o(d));
and

(2)       the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of Registrant.

Dated:  August 20, 2002

                                By /s/ Stanley Katzman
                                Stanley Katzman
                                Wien & Malkin LLP, Supervisor





**Registrant's organizational documents do not provide for a
Chief Financial Officer or other officer with equivalent rights
and duties.  As described in the Quarterly Report, Registrant is
a limited liability company which is supervised by Wien & Malkin
LLP.  Accordingly, this Chief Financial Officer certification is
being signed by a senior member of the financial/accounting staff
of Registrant's supervisor.








250 West 57th St. Associates L.L.C.
June 30, 2002
No. 48066.

#### Protest 862347-G of Charles Bruning Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

It appeared that the cloth in question is composed of cotton and noncotton material and is similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Perseverance Import Corporation*v. *United States*(T. D. 49290). The protest was therefore sustained in accordance with stipulation of counsel.
# C_2015205EN.01001702.xml

| 22.6.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 205/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.6.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 205/17

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van Cassatie (Belgium) lodged on 3 April 2015 — Samira Achbita, Centrum voor gelijkheid van kansen en voor racismebestrijding v G4S Secure Solutions NV

(Case C-157/15)

(2015/C 205/24)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Referring court

Hof van Cassatie

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Samira Achbita, Centrum voor gelijkheid van kansen en voor racismebestrijding

Applicants:

Defendant: G4S Secure Solutions NV

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Should Article 2(2)(a) of Council Directive 2000/78/EC (1) of 27 November 2000 establishing a general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation be interpreted as meaning that the prohibition on wearing, as a female Muslim, a headscarf at the workplace does not constitute direct discrimination where the employer’s rule prohibits all employees from wearing outward signs of political, philosophical and religious beliefs at the workplace?

1

---

(1)  OJ 2000 L 303, p. 16.

1

---