alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-10.10





 EXHIBIT 10.10 

AMENDMENT TO ECOMBUSTIBLE PRODUCTS 

HOLDINGS LLC n/k/a ECOMBUSTIBLE ENERGY LLC 

CLASS M AWARD AGREEMENT WITH JAMES DRISCOLL 

This Amendment (“Amendment”) to the December 16, 2020 eCombustible Products Holdings LLC (n/k/a eCombustible Energy LLC)
(“the Company”) Class M Award Agreement between and among the Company, EPH Management Holdings LLC (“EPH”) and James Driscoll (“Agreement”) is hereby entered into this 14th day of November, 2021 as follows: 
 1. The Vesting Schedule set forth on Schedule A
to the Agreement is hereby amended to include the following additional provision at the end of the paragraph: “Notwithstanding the foregoing, if a merger with Benneserre Capital Acquisition Corp. (“the Merger”) closes, the unvested
units which are the subject of the Agreement shall immediately vest. 
 2. All other provisions and terms of the Agreement not inconsistent
with this Amendment shall remain in full force and effect. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have duly executed this Written
Consent as of the date first above written. 
 eCombustible Products Holdings LLC 

n/k/a eCombustible Energy LLC 
  

			
	By:	 	 /s/ Jorge Arevalo

	Name: JORGE AREVALO
	Title: Chief Executive Officer
	
	EPH Management Holdings LLC
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Jorge Arevalo

	Name: JORGE AREVALO
	Title: Chief Executive Officer
	
	Participant:
	
	 /s/ James Driscoll

	JAMES DRISCOLL
Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         I, Gordon R. Arnold,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as
adopted  pursuant to Section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that the
quarterly report of Sierra Monitor  Corporation on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly
period ended September 30, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or  15(d)  of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934 and that  information
contained  in such  quarterly  report on Form  10-QSB  fairly  presents,  in all
material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations of Sierra
Monitor Corporation.


Date:   November 12, 2004                   By:  /s/ Gordon R. Arnold
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 Gordon R. Arnold
                                                 Chief Executive Officer
                                                 Chief Financial Officer



                                                                   Page 16 of 16
Skip Links

USGS HomeContact USGSSearch USGS

Miscellaneous Investigations Series I-1420 (NK-19)

About USGS /  Science Topics /  Maps, Products & Publications /  Education / Publication: FAQ

Pubs Warehouse

## Quaternary Geologic Map of the Boston 4° x 6° Quadrangle, United States and Canada

#### *Edited and integrated by* Gerald M. Richmond and David S. Fullerton*State and Province compilations by* Joseph H. Hartshorn, Woodrow B. Thompson, William F. Chapman, Robert F. Black, Gerald M. Richmond, Douglas R. Grant, and David S. Fullerton

| This map is part of the Quaternary Geologic Atlas of the United States (I-1420). It was first published as a printed edition in 1991. The geologic data have now been captured digitally and are presented here along with images of the printed map sheet and component parts as PDF files.
*I-1420 (NK-19)*Map PDF (3.7 MB)                    Right-Click to 'Save As' or 'Download'*I-1420 (NK-19)*Map PDF (3.7 MB)                  Right-Click to 'Save As' or 'Download' | Version 1.1

Posted August 2006
- Map PDF (3.7 MB)
(This text-only version of the map is accessible as defined in Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, Amendments of 1998.)
- Readme  TXT (3 KB)
- Boston metadata  TXT (33 KB)
Download ZIP archives
- ArcInfo shapefiles (9.8 MB)
- ArcInfo exportfiles (9.9 MB)
- PDF files of map (11 MB) |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format (PDF); the latest version of Adobe Acrobat Reader or similar software is required to view it. Download the latest version of Acrobat Reader, free of charge or go to access.adobe.com for free tools that allow visually impaired users to read PDF files.

| AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and Notices                                                                                                                                                               |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| U.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological Survey      URL: https://pubsdata.usgs.gov/pubs/imap/i-1420/nk-19/Questions or Assistance: USGS Web ContactPage Last Modified: Wed Nov 30 17:33 EDT 2016 |  |

----
AFS-11-131-E 

Feb 09 2011 

 Exemption No. 10204 

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2011-0051 

Mr. Ghafoor Siddique 

Chief Executive Officer 

Flight International Academy 

125 Perimeter Road 

Nashua, NH 03063 

Dear Mr. Siddique: 

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our 

decision, explains its basis, and gives you the conditions and limitations of the exemption, 

including the date it ends. 

The Basis for Our Decision 

By letter dated January 1, 2011, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on 

behalf of Flight International Academy for an exemption from § 141.35(e) of Title 14, Code 

of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). That exemption, if granted, would allow Flight 

International Academy to appoint Mr. Kenneth Wyman as its chief ground instructor of the 

certificated pilot school under part 141. 

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any 

delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Flight International Academy. 

The FAA has issued a grant of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to 

those presented in your petition. In Grant of Exemption No. 4713 (copy enclosed), the FAA 

found that safety would not adversely be affected if it permitted the San Diego Mesa College 

to appoint Mr. Donald E. Taylor as its chief ground instructor. The FAA determined that 

Mr. Taylor’s vast aviation experience and qualifications would provide an equivalent level of 

safety as that provided by the rule. The FAA considered the recruiting of quality ground 

instructor personnel to teach pilot ground school courses to be in the public interest. 
2 

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that— 

 they do not differ materially from those presented by the petitioner in the enclosed grant 

of exemption; 

 the reasons stated by the FAA for granting the enclosed exemption also apply to the 

situation you present; and 

 a grant of exemption is in the public interest. 

Our Decision 

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator 

has delegated to me, I hereby grant Flight International Academy, an exemption from 

14 CFR § 141.35(e) to the extent necessary to permit Flight International Academy to appoint 

Mr. Kenneth Wyman as chief ground instructor of its certificated pilot school under 

part 141. 

This exemption terminates on January 31, 2013, unless sooner superseded or rescinded. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

John M. Allen 

Director, Flight Standards Service 

Enclosure
(Reap. Dec, 8842)

#### Carbons, Inc. *v.*United States

Entry Nos. 722326; 738449; 750902.

(Decided June 13, 1957)

*Fred Bennett', Jordan & Klingaman,*associate counsel; for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Johnson, Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the parties hereto, subject to the approval of the court,

> 1- That all the merchandise on the entries the subject of the above-entitled reappraisement appeals consists of arc light carbons imported from France.

> 2- That the issues in the aforesaid appeals are the same in all material respects as those decided in *Bert Friedberg & Company*v. *United States,*R. D. 8590, and that the record in the said R. D. 8590 may be incorporated in the record in each of the aforesaid appeals.

> 3- That the appraised value of the merchandise in each of the aforesaid appeals, less 14.8 per cent, is equal to the price, at the time of exportation of such merchandise to the United States, at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale for home consumption to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature, and all other costs, charges, and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States, and that, on or about the dates of exportation of the merchandise herein involved, merchandise such as or similar thereto was not sold or offered for sale in the country of exportation for export to the United States.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the reappraisement appeals herein may be submitted on the foregoing stipulation.

On the agreed facts I find the foreign value, as that value is defined in section 402 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by section 8 of the Customs Administrative Act of 1938, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such value was in each instance the appraised value, less 14.8 per centum.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                5
<LEGEND>

THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
COMPANY'S  BALANCE  SHEET AND  STATEMENT OF  OPERATIONS  AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND THE NOTES THERETO.

</LEGEND>

<MULTIPLIER>             1,000

<S>                                              <C>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                     JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                       SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                            9-MOS
<CASH>                                                     862
<SECURITIES>                                                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                                             1628
<ALLOWANCES>                                               142
<INVENTORY>                                               1314
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                          4017
<PP&E>                                                    1172
<DEPRECIATION>                                             922
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                            4723
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                     1295
<BONDS>                                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                        0
<PREFERRED>                                                  0
<COMMON>                                                  3160
<OTHER-SE>                                                   0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                              4723
<SALES>                                                   7141
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                          7141
<CGS>                                                     2677
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                             2677
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          3687
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                          (6)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                            782
<INCOME-TAX>                                               269
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                        512
<DISCONTINUED>                                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                              0
<CHANGES>                                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                                               512
<EPS-BASIC>                                               0.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                             0.04


</TABLE>
# C_2015354EN.01002701.xml

| 26.10.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 354/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 354/27

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Saarbrücken (Germany) lodged on 28 August 2015 — Criminal proceedings against K.B.

(Case C-458/15)

(2015/C 354/28)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Landgericht Saarbrücken

Party to the main proceedings

Party to the main proceedings

K.B.

Question referred

Question referred

Is the placing of the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) on the list provided for in Article 2(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 of 27 December 2001 on specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism (1) for the period from 11 August 2007 to 27 November 2009 (inclusive) resulting in particular from Council Decisions 2007/445/EC of 28 June 2007 (2), 2007/868/EC of 20 December 2007 (3), 2008/583/EC of 15 July 2008 (4), 2009/62/EC of 26 January 2009 (5), and Council Regulation (EC) No 501/2009 of 15 June 2009 (6) illegal?

1

2

3

4

5

6

---

(1)  OJ 2001 L 344, p. 70.

1

(2)  OJ 2007 L 169, p. 58.

2

(3)  OJ 2007 L 340, p. 100.

3

(4)  OJ 2008 L 188, p. 21.

4

(5)  OJ 2009 L 23, p. 25.

5

(6)  OJ 2009 L 151, p. 14.

6

---
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 1**  **0 -**  **1273**

ESTATE OF MARY V. ALLISON, Donor, Deceased; DANIEL B. ALLISON, II, former attorney of record for the Estate of Mary V. Allison, Donor, Deceased ,
P etitioner s – Appell ant s ,

v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE , Respondent

– Appell ee .

Appeal from the United States Tax Court. ( Tax Ct. Nos. 0 0

- 247; 00

- 714 )

Submitted : November 30 , 2010 Decided: December 3, 2010

Before WILKINSON, K EENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Jud ge s .

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Daniel B. Allison, II, Appellant Pro Se

. Curti s Clarence Pett, Bruce R. Ellise n, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent i n this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:

Da niel B. Allison , II, individually and as the administrator of the Estate of Mary V. Allison, appeals from the

t ax court ’ s order s imposing sanctions on him and upholding the Commissioner’s determination of a deficiency in the estate’s gift tax

. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the t ax

court. Estate of Mary V. Allison v

. Comm’r of IRS , Nos. 00

- 247;
00

- 714 (U.S.T.C. Feb. 12, 2009 & Dec. 1, 2009) . We dis pense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRM ED
No. 48725.

#### Protests 17586-K, etc., of Norse Produce Co. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and *Scaramelli*v. *United States*(9 Cust. Ct. 270, C. D. 706) and Abstracts 42146 and 48269 the collector was directed to reliquidate the entries, allowing 21⁄2 percent in the weight of the cheese to compensate for the weight of the inedible coverings.
# Official Journal C 23/28 J

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 23 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4828 January 2005 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 23

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4828 January 2005

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | Commission |
| 2005/C 023/1 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |
| 2005/C 023/2 | Summary of Community decisions on marketing authorizations in respect of medicinal products from 15 December 2004 to 15 January 2005(Published pursuant to Article 12 or Article 34 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2309/93) | 2 |
| 2005/C 023/3 | Commission communication in the framework of the implementation of Directive 2003/53/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 June 2003 amending for the twenty-sixth time Council Directive 76/769/EEC relating to restrictions on the marketing and use of certain dangerous substances and preparations (nonylphenol, nonylphenol ethoxylate and cement) (1) | 8 |
| 2005/C 023/4 | List of coordinating authorities designated by the Member States for the purpose of conformity checks in the sector of fruit and vegetables | 9 |
| 2005/C 023/5 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.3656 — Achmea/Athlon/PartsPlan JV) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1) | 14 |
| 2005/C 023/6 | Lists published under Article 30 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1291/2000 of 9 June 2000 laying down common detailed rules for the application of the system of import and export licences and advance fixing certificates for agricultural products | 15 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

Commission

2005/C 023/1

Euro exchange rates

1

2005/C 023/2

Summary of Community decisions on marketing authorizations in respect of medicinal products from 15 December 2004 to 15 January 2005(Published pursuant to Article 12 or Article 34 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2309/93)

(Published pursuant to Article 12 or Article 34 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2309/93)

2

2005/C 023/3

Commission communication in the framework of the implementation of Directive 2003/53/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 June 2003 amending for the twenty-sixth time Council Directive 76/769/EEC relating to restrictions on the marketing and use of certain dangerous substances and preparations (nonylphenol, nonylphenol ethoxylate and cement) (1)

8

2005/C 023/4

List of coordinating authorities designated by the Member States for the purpose of conformity checks in the sector of fruit and vegetables

9

2005/C 023/5

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.3656 — Achmea/Athlon/PartsPlan JV) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1)

14

2005/C 023/6

Lists published under Article 30 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1291/2000 of 9 June 2000 laying down common detailed rules for the application of the system of import and export licences and advance fixing certificates for agricultural products

15

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
# C_2017300EN.01002701.xml

| 11.9.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 300/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.9.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 300/27

---

Order of the President of the Ninth Chamber of the Court of 19 June 2017 — European Commission v Czech Republic

(Case C-606/15) (1)

1

(2017/C 300/31)

Language of the case: Czech

The President of the Ninth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 27, 25.1.2016.

1

---
### IN THE UNI TED STATES COURT OFAPPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCUIT

No. 10-10525 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee

v. RAZIEL MARTINEZ, Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:09-CR-147-1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Raziel Martinez pleaded guilty to aiding and abetting the distribution of

a controlled subst a n c e and was sentenced to 71 months of imprisonment and three years of supervised release. Martinez argues on appeal that the district court committed clear error when it held hi m ac c o u ntable at sentencing both for four ounces of heroin observed by a confidential source lying on a table at a r e s i d e n c e at which Martinez was selling heroin o n M ay 22, 2007, and for five ounces of heroin U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s

F i ft h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D June30 , 20 11 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Purs uant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court hasd ete rm inedthat this op inion sho uld not * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 .4. Case: 10-10525 Document: 00511527129 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/30/2011No. 10-10525

contained in five sep ar at e one-ounce packets wrapped in black tape that were recovered from Martinez two days later on May 24, 2007. He contends that the four ounces of heroin observed on May 22, 2007, was the same heroin that was included in the five ounces of heroin recovered from Martinez on May 24, 2007, and that the Government did not meet its burd e n o f p r oving that such a guidelines adjustment based on drug quantity was applicable. Additionally, the Government moves to strike its assertion in its brief that Martinez had a second

source of supply in Fort Worth, Texas, and any arguments relying on that assertion. The district court was entitled to consider such evidence, and aside from his own speculati o n , Martinez has not offered in rebuttal any evidence demonstrating that the two quantities of heroin were identical. Se e U n i t ed States v. Rose , 449 F.3d 627, 633 (5th Cir. 2006); United States v. Betancourt , 422 F.3d 240, 246-47 (5th Cir. 2005). Accordingly, Martinez has not shown that the district court’s drug quantity determination was not plausible in light of the record as a whole, and thus he has not shown that the district court committed clear error in calculating the drug quantity for which he was held accountable at sentencing. See Betancourt , 422 F.3d at 246. AFFIRMED; GOVERNMENT’S MOTION TO STRIKE GRANTED.

2 Case: 10-10525 Document: 00511527129 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/30/2011
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

March 26, 2008

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 07-14240

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 07-00169-CR-T-30-TGW

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

versus 

JIMMIE DORSEY, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

_________________________

(March 26, 2008)

Before CARNES, MARCUS and WILSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Alec Fitzgerald Hall, appointed counsel for Jimmie Dorsey, has filed a
2

motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent

review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of

the appeal is correct. Because independent review of the entire record reveals no

arguably meritorious issues, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and

Dorsey’s convictions and sentence are AFFIRMED.