alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| (logo) WELLS

           FARGO | **Commercial  Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084,  8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334

 

 

  |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

** **

 

Referenceis hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of May1, 2016, by and among CCRE COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES, L.P., as Depositor,WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, RIALTO CAPITALADVISORS, LLC, as Special Servicer, U.S.BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee,Certificate Administrator and Paying Agent, U.S.BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION , ASCustodian, PARK BRIDGE LENDER SERVICES LLC, as Operating Advisor AND AssetRepresentations Reviewer with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-ThroughCertificates, CFCRE 2016-C4 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms usedherein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuantto Section 10.11 of this Agreement, I, Leslie Hayton, Managing Director ofCommercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that: 

 

1.                  Areview of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January1, 2018 through December 31, 2018 (the “Reporting Period”), and of itsperformance per the Agreement during such period has been made under mysupervision, and 

 

2.                 To thebest of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilledall of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughoutthe Reporting Period. 

 

 

INWITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28thday of February 2019. 

 

 

/s/Leslie Hayton 

LeslieHayton 

ManagingDirector

WellsFargo Bank 

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank,  N.A. | (logo) Together  we’ll go far |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
No. 39027.

#### Protests 237655-G, etc., of L. D. Bloch & Co. (New York).

*344Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of atomizers; flacons, and powder boxes chiefly used in the kitchen or household or on the table for utilitarian purposes, or hollow ware. The claim at 40 percent under paragraph 339 was sustained.
(Reap. Dec. 9352)

#### Plywood & Door Manufacturers Corporation v. United States

Entry No. 707835, etc.

(Decided March 19, 1959)

*James Wilson Young*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Mollison, Judge:

Counsel for the parties have submitted the appeals for reappraisement enumerated in schedule *“A,”*attached hereto, upon a stipulation on the basis of which I find that, except for the items of merchandise set forth in schedule “B,” also attached hereto, the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise involved in the said appeals for reappraisement is foreign value, as defined in section 402(c), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and that such value, in each instance, is the appraised unit value, less 4 per centum, net, packed.

The appeals for reappraisement having been abandoned as to the merchandise specified in schedule “B,” they are, to that extent, dismissed.

Judgment will issue accordingly.

Schedule “B”

Reappraisement No. Collector’s No. Entry No. Date of Export

R58/5334 01740 788095 10/19/55

Birch plywood as follows:

BJ/WG grade, *%"*thick, 84" x 50"

84" x 48"

R58/5336 01743 820844 11/10/55

Birch plywood as follows:

A/A grade, J4" thick, 13" x 8"

R58/5337 01744 825625 12/1/55

12/1/55

*563Reappraisement No. Collector’s No. Entry No. Date of Export

Birch, plywood as follows:

BB/WG grade, %4" thick 62" x 62"

“ “ 58" x 58"

“ “ 60" x 60"

“ “ 61" x 61"

BJ/BB grade, thick 36" x 48"

“ “ 51" x 51"

“ “ 54" x 44K"

“ “ 34" x 26"

“ “ 55" x 44K"

“ “ 53" x 44%"

R58/5338 01745 827841 12/7/55

Birch plywood as follows:

BB/WG grade, %4" thick 62" x 62"

“ “ “ “ 61" x 61"

“ “ “ “ 60" x 60"

“ “ “ “ 58" x 58"
No. 48067.

#### Protest 93645-K of Albert P. Meyer & Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

At the trial it was stipulated between counsel that the paper horns in question are in chief value of lithographic prints and in part of bamboo. In accordance therewith and on the authority of Abstracts 39509 and 46487 the claim at 45 percent under paragraph 409 was sustained.
No. 64343.

protests 59/29684, etc. (Buffalo).

#### C. J. Tower & Sons of Buffalo, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of prepared or preserved pork similar in all material respects to that the subject of *C. J. Tower & Sons*v. *United States*(43 Cust. Ct. 36, C.D. 2100), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
----

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 28 October 2004

in Case T-76/03 Herbert Meister against Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (1)

(Officials - Reassignment of a head of service - Interest of the service - Equivalence of posts - Right to freedom of expression - Duty to have regard for the interests of officials - Statement of reasons - Right to be heard - Non-contractual liability)

(2005/C 6/68)

Language of the case: French

In Case T-76/03: Herbert Meister, official of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), residing at Muchamiel (Spain), represented by G. Vandersanden, lawyer, against the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Agent: O. Waelbroeck) – application for, first, annulment of the OHIM's decision PERS-AFFECT-02-30 of 22 April 2002 appointing the applicant, in the interest of the service, with his post, as legal adviser to the Vice-President for Legal Affairs and, second, for damages – the Court, composed of J. Azizi, President, M. Jaeger and E. Cremona, Judges; D. Christiansen, Administrator, for the Registrar, has given a judgment on 28 October 2004 in which it:

----

(1)OJ C 101 of 26.4.2003.

----
#### Sackett *& al. versus*Lowell.

A purchase of goods by the defendant is not completed by his agreeing to buy them at a fixed price and permitting them to be charged in account, if there be no term of credit agreed on, and if he do not receive the goods, nor order them to be forwarded.

Testimony *that*the plaintiff made a sale of goods to the defendant, at a stipulated price, and charged them, (in his presence,) in account; *that*nothing was said as to the length of the credit; *that*defendant did not take the goods, nor direct them to be forwarded, will not sustain an action for the price of the goods, although the plaintiff forwarded them by express to the city of defendant’s residence; there being no proof that he received them.

Assumpsit for a small bill of jewelry, $32,25, submitted on the evidence contained in the deposition of the plaintiffs’ *clerk;*the court to render such judgment as law and justice require.

The deposition stated, in substance, *that*the plaintiffs are jewelers in co-partnership, resident in New York; *that*deponent is their clerk; *that*he showed the articles to defendant and told him the price; *that*he sold them to defendant and charged them on plaintiffs’ book, and defendant saw the *165
      *charge; that*nothing was *paid;*and *that*nothing was said about the length of credit; *that*he did not again see the defendant ; *that*defendant did not receive the articles or give any direction about their being sent; and *that*deponent sent them by Hamden’s express, directed to Bangor, the residence of defendant.

*Peters,*for plaintiff.

Usage fixes the term of credit at six months. A sale and a forwarding were proved. In the absence of direction, as to the sending, custom justifies the course taken. Even if never received, defendant would be liable for the price. Plaintiffs would have been liable to defendant in trover.

In its principles, though not in its facts, this case is like *Merrill*v. *Parker,*24 Maine, 89.

*Sanborn,*for defendant.

Howard, J.

orally.—There was no delivery of the articles, nor order to send them; and no evidence, that defendant received them. Nothing was paid or agreed to be paid. The evidence is insufficient. *Nonsuit.*
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

 EASTERN DIVISION

United States of America 

-vsJhonny Polanco-Murillo

________________________________ 

Case No. 2:12-cr-051 (1) 

 

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 

 CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY 

The Defendant, by consent, has appeared before me pursuant to Rule 

11, F.R.Cr.P. and has entered a plea of guilty to Count one (1) of the 

Indictment. After examining the Defendant under oath concerning each of 

the subjects mentioned in Rule 11, I determine that the defendant is 

competent and capable of entering an informed plea, that the guilty plea 

is knowingly and voluntary made and that the offenses charged are supported 

by an independent basis in fact containing each of the essential elements 

of such offense. 

I therefore RECOMMEND the plea agreement and the plea of guilty should 

be accepted and the Defendant should be adjudged guilty and sentenced 

accordingly. Otherwise, the plea agreement should be rejected and the 

defendant should be allowed to withdraw the guilty plea. 

The Defendant remains in the custody of the U.S. Marshal pending 

sentencing. 

Date: May 17, 2012 /s/ Terence P. Kemp 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

NOTICE

Failure to file written objections to this Report and Recommendation 

within fourteen (14) days from the date of its service shall bar an aggrieved 

party from attacking such Report and Recommendation before the assigned 

United States District Judge. 28 U.S.C. Section 636(b)(1)(B). 

Case: 2:12-cr-00051-JLG Doc #: 30 Filed: 05/18/12 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 9278 

To amend section 5336 of title 31, United States Code, to provide existing 

small businesses with an additional year to file beneficial ownership 

information, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 2, 2024 

Mr. NUNN of Iowa (for himself, Ms. CARAVEO, Mr. HILL, and Ms. DAVIDS

of Kansas) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To amend section 5336 of title 31, United States Code, 

to provide existing small businesses with an additional 

year to file beneficial ownership information, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SMALL BUSINESS BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP RE4 PORTING EXTENSION. 

5 Section 5336(b)(1)(B) of title 31, United States 

6 Code, is amended by inserting after ‘‘paragraph (2)’’ the 

7 following: ‘‘, except that any such reporting company that 

8 is a small business concern (as defined under section 3 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 9278 IH

1 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 632)) shall submit 

2 to FinCEN a report that contains such information during 

3 the period beginning on the effective date of the regula4 tions prescribed under this subsection and ending on De5 cember 31, 2025’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
EXHIBIT 32.1


                  CERTIFICATION OF CO-CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


    Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), I, Michael
R. Mulcahy, President and Co-Chief Executive Officer of Trans-Lux Corporation,
do hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge that:

    (1) The Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2006 being filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

    (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

    This Certification accompanies this Form 10-Q as an exhibit, but shall not
be deemed as having been filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 or as a separate disclosure document of the Registrant or
the certifying officer.



                                       /s/ Michael R. Mulcahy
                                       ----------------------------------------
Date:  November 17, 2006               Michael R. Mulcahy
                                       President and Co-Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>
                       UGI UTILITIES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
        COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES - EXHIBIT 12.1
                             (THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                  Six
                                                 Months
                                                 Ended                      Year Ended September 30,
                                                March 31,      -----------------------------------------------------
                                                  2002           2001           2000           1999           1998
                                                --------       --------       --------       --------       --------
<S>                                             <C>            <C>            <C>            <C>            <C>
EARNINGS:

Earnings before income taxes                    $ 60,437       $ 79,568       $ 82,882       $ 63,139       $ 57,007
Interest expense                                   8,491         18,724         18,135         17,317         17,383
Amortization of debt discount and expense            142            264            218            215            200
Interest component of rental expense                 696          1,541          1,318          1,539          1,624
                                                --------       --------       --------       --------       --------
                                                $ 69,766       $100,097       $102,553       $ 82,210       $ 76,214
                                                ========       ========       ========       ========       ========
FIXED CHARGES:

Interest expense                                $  8,491       $ 18,724       $ 18,135       $ 17,317       $ 17,383
Amortization of debt discount and expense            142            264            218            215            200
Allowance for funds used during
    construction (capitalized interest)                2             12             17             36             39
Interest component of rental expense                 696          1,541          1,318          1,539          1,624
                                                --------       --------       --------       --------       --------
                                                $  9,331       $ 20,541       $ 19,688       $ 19,107       $ 19,246
                                                ========       ========       ========       ========       ========

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                  7.48           4.87           5.21           4.30           3.96
                                                ========       ========       ========       ========       ========
</TABLE>
```

[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 81 (Friday, April 27, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 21074]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-8035]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service

Open Meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Volunteer Income Tax 
Assistance (VITA) Issue Committee

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel VITA Issue 
Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting 
public comment, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at 
the Internal Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Monday, May 21, from 9 a.m. to 4 p.m.; 
Tuesday, May 22, from 9 a.m. to 4 p.m.; and Wednesday, May 23, 2007 
from 8 a.m. to 11 a.m. Central Time.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Barbara Toy at 1-888-912-1227, or 
(414) 231-2360.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that a meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel VITA Issue Committee will 
be held Monday, May 21, from 9 a.m. to 4 p.m.; Tuesday, May 22, from 9 
a.m. to 4 p.m.; and Wednesday, May 23, 2007 from 8 a.m. to 11 a.m. 
Central Time, at the Hotel Sheraton Gunter, 205 East Houston Street, 
San Antonio, TX 78205. Public comments will be welcome during the 
meeting. You can also submit written comments to the Panel by faxing to 
(414) 231-2363, or by mail to Taxpayer Advocacy Panel, Stop 1006MIL, 
P.O. Box 3205, Milwaukee, WI 53201-3205, or you can contact us at 
www.improveirs.org. Please contact Barbara Toy at 1-888-912-1227 or 
(414) 231-2360 for additional information.
    The agenda will include the following: Various VITA Issues.

    Dated: April 20. 2007.
John Fay,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
 [FR Doc. E7-8035 Filed 4-26-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
```
# C_2015178EN.01000902.xml

| 1.6.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 178/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.6.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 178/9

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Centrale Raad van Beroep (Netherlands) lodged on 18 March 2015 — H.C. Chavez-Vilchez and Others, other parties: Raad van bestuur van de Sociale verzekeringsbank (Svb) and Others

(Case C-133/15)

(2015/C 178/10)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Referring court

Centrale Raad van Beroep

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: H.C. Chavez-Vilchez, P. Pinas, U. Nikolic, X.V. Garcia Perez, J. Uwituze, Y.R.L. Wip, I.O. Enowassam, A.E. Guerrero Chavez,

Applicants:

Other parties: Raad van bestuur van de Sociale verzekeringsbank (Svb), College van burgemeester en wethouders van de gemeente Arnhem, College van burgemeester en wethouders van de gemeente’s-Gravenhage, College van burgemeester en wethouders van de gemeente’s-Hertogenbosch, College van burgemeester en wethouders van de gemeente Amsterdam, College van burgemeester en wethouders van de gemeente Rijswijk, College van burgemeester en wethouders van de gemeente Rotterdam.

Other parties:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Must Article 20 of the TFEU be interpreted as precluding a Member State from depriving a third-country national who is responsible for the day to day and primary care of his/her minor child, who is a national of that Member State, of the right of residence in that Member State? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Must Article 20 of the TFEU be interpreted as precluding a Member State from depriving a third-country national who is responsible for the day to day and primary care of his/her minor child, who is a national of that Member State, of the right of residence in that Member State?

| 2. | In answering that question, is it relevant that the legal, financial and/or emotional burden does not rest entirely with that parent and, furthermore, that it cannot be excluded that the other parent, who is a national of the Member State, might in fact be able to care for the child? In that case, should the parent/third-country national have to make a plausible case that the other parent is not able to assume responsibility for the care of the child, so that the child would be obliged to leave the territory of the European Union if the parent/third-country national is denied a right of residence? |
| --- | --- |

2.

In answering that question, is it relevant that the legal, financial and/or emotional burden does not rest entirely with that parent and, furthermore, that it cannot be excluded that the other parent, who is a national of the Member State, might in fact be able to care for the child? In that case, should the parent/third-country national have to make a plausible case that the other parent is not able to assume responsibility for the care of the child, so that the child would be obliged to leave the territory of the European Union if the parent/third-country national is denied a right of residence?

---
No. 39009.

#### Protest 84076-G of Maurice Bandler, Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

The record established that certain items consist of articles in chief value of cellulose filaments similar to those involved in Abstract 37230. The claim at 60 percent under paragraph 31 was therefore sustained.
Case: 2:12-cv-01182-EAS-EPD Doc #: 56 Filed: 11/15/13 Page: 1 of 1  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-12T13:26:00-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
MEMORANDUM

DATE: May 12, 2015

TO: Dockets EPA-HQ-OAR-2013-0602, EPA-HQ-OAR-2013-0603, and EPA-HQOAR-2013-0495

FROM: Lora Strine

SUBJECT: Summary of Conference Call with Chris Van Atten and Amlan Saha and EPA

Staff

SUMMARY

Discussion of 111(d) Clean Power Plan

ATTENDEES

Lora Strine, EPA

Elineth Torres, EPA

EPA Regional contacts from the implementation team

Chris Van Atten <vanatten@mjbradley.com>

Amlan Saha <asaha@mjbradley.com>