alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Docket Number: EPA-HQ-RCRA-2008-0329 

REGULATORY SUPPORT: 

Assessment of Potential Costs, Benefits, Environmental Justice, and 

Other Impacts; and Regulatory Flexibility Screening Assessment

Proposed Amendments to the Identification of Non-Hazardous Secondary Materials 

That Are Solid Waste – Final Rule (76 FR 15456, et seq), March 21, 2011. 

============================================================ 

 EPA is proposing amendments to 40 CFR Part 241, which was codified by the NonHazardous Secondary Materials (NHSM) final rule (76 FR 15456, et seq), originally 

promulgated on March 21, 2011. The necessary regulatory support documents for this action 

that address all relevant statutes and Executive Orders are located in the following EPA Dockets: 

i) Commercial/Industrial Solid Waste Incinerators (CISWI), identified by Docket ID 

No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2003-0119, 

ii) Industrial/Commercial/Institutional Boilers and Process Heaters: 

(1) Major source rule, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2002-0058 

(2) Area source rule, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2006-0790 

 Executive Order 12866 Requirements 

Assessment of Potential Costs, Benefits, Environmental Justice, and Other Impacts

The proposed amendments to the March 21, 2011 NHSM final rule are intended to clarify 

several provisions in 40 CFR Part 241, which provides the standards and procedures for 

identifying whether non-hazardous secondary materials (NHSM) are solid waste when used as 

fuels or ingredients in combustion units. As such, this action alone will not result in any costs, 

benefits, environmental justice, or other impact to the regulated community1

 or the government. 

The proposed rule itself does not include any emission standards and does not require changes in 

the management or use of secondary materials. Only with the promulgation of the final CISWI 

and major source boiler rules would society realize any costs, benefits, environmental justice, or 

other impacts. 

 

1 Aside from negligible administrative costs (e.g., reading the RCRA part of the proposal). 
Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)

as amended by the 

Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act (SBREFA) 

Regulatory Flexibility Screening Assessment 

 The proposed NHSM amendments will not impose requirements2 on any entities apart 

from those that became effective in conjunction with the promulgation of the March 2011 final 

CISWI and boiler rules. No small entities are directly regulated by the proposed NHSM 

amendments. As such, any potential impacts to small entities in affected sectors are addressed in 

the regulatory flexibility analyses prepared in support of the final CISWI and boiler rules, as 

referenced under point ii above. 

Paperwork Reduction Act 

Information Collection Request

 This action is believed to result in no changes to the information collection requirements 

of the NHSM final rule, and will have no impact on the information collection estimate of 

project cost and hour burden made and approved by OMB. 

 

2 Aside from negligible administrative costs (e.g., reading the RCRA part of the proposal).
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-2565
GEORGE REYNOLD EVANS, SR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DAVID GODWIN, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Chief District Judge. (CA-96-138-7-F) Submitted: January 23, 1997 Decided: January 31, 1997 Before RUSSELL, WILKINS, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. George Reynold Evans, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's orders denying reliefon his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint and on his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Evans v. Godwin , No. CA-96-138-7-F (E.D.N.C. Oct. 21, 1996). We dispense with oral argument becausethe facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
July 9, 2010

THE NATIONAL AIRLINES COUNCIL OF CANADA REQUEST

BEFORE THE US DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

WASHINGTON, D.C.

In the matter of:

Enhancing Airline Passenger

Protections Docket No.:

DOT

‐ OST

‐ 2010

‐ 0140

Request by the National Airlines Council of Canada

for a 60 day extension of the comment period

The National Airlines Council of Canada (NACC) respectfully requests, on behalf of itself and of its member

airlines

– Air Canada, Air Transat, Jazz Air LP and WestJet

– an additional 60 days to submit its comments

regarding the Department of Transportation (DOT) Notice of Proposed Rulemaking

, “Enhancing Airline

Passenger Protections,” (EAPP

‐ NPRM), issued on June 8, 2010, which seeks to expand upon the published

Final Rule under the same title (DOT

‐ OST

‐ 2007

‐ 0022).

The EAPP

‐ NPRM currently provides until August 9, 2010, 60 days from publication, for the public to

comment on the EAPP

‐ NPRM. The NACC seeks an additional 60 days for the following reasons:

 The EAPP

‐ NPRM seeks to impose on foreign carriers significant and new regulatory burdens,

which the NACC must adequately analyze in order to provide comprehensive and valuable

comments to the DOT. As the regulation would touch on almost all aspects of an airline’s

business, the NACC needs to consult with its members and the various departments involved to

study the many facets of the regulation including cost, timing, feasibility and potential

unintended consequences. Sixty days is not a sufficient time period in which to collect the

extensive amounts of data and information from all affected parties necessary to adequately

evaluate the EAPP

‐ NPRM.

 The EAPP

‐ NPRM requests detailed information on the impacts, costs, and benefits on foreign

carriers of proposed time intervals for deplanement, contingency plans, customer service plans,

communication strategies, covered operations, data collection and publication, denied boarding

compensation, pricing, fees and oversale regulations, and other provisions. Much of this data is

not readily accessible and the NACC needs considerable time to collect and provide meaningful

comments on these subjects. The Department has published an extensive cost benefit analysis of the proposed regulation.

The NACC may need to secure the support of outside experts in order to provide a meaningful

response to this analysis.

 The EAPP

‐ NPRM could raise implications in terms of Canadian and international law. The NACC

must be provided sufficient time to discern these impacts on its member carriers.

 Finally, the comment period for this NPRM falls during the busy summer travel and vacation

season, during which airline resources are stretched to the limit. In order for the NACC to

provide valuable comments on all aspects of the proposal, the comment period must be

extended into the fall.



### For these reasons, the NACC requests an additional 60 days to collect the aforementioned essential

information to provide valuable comments on the EAPP

‐ NPRM.

Thank you in advance for your consideration of this request.

Sincerely,

NATIONAL AIRLINES COUNCIL OF CANADA

George Petsikas

President
No. 39011.

#### Protests 986101, etc., of Einstein Wolff Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

The record established that certain ítems consist of articles in chief value of cellulose filaments similar to those involved in Abstract 37230. The claim at 60 percent under paragraph 31 was therefore sustained.
| (logo) WELLS  FARGO | **Commercial  Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084,  8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|---------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

** **

** **

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

** **

Referenceis hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as ofMarch 1, 2016, by and among J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage SecuritiesCorp., as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as MasterServicer, Midland Loan Services, A Division of PNC Bank, National Association,as Special Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as CertificateAdministrator, Wilmington Trust, National Association, as  Trustee, andPentalpha Surveillance LLC, as Operating Advisor and as Asset RepresentationsReviewer, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series2016-C1 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein nototherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuantto Section 11.09 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice Presidentof Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1.       Areview of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January1, 2017 through December 31, 2017 (the “Reporting Period”), and of itsperformance per the Agreement during such period has been made under mysupervision, and

 

2.       Tothe best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer hasfulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respectsthroughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

INWITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28thday of February 2018.

 

/s/Daniel Bober

DanielBober

ExecutiveVice President 

WellsFargo Bank

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank,  N.A. | (logo)  Together we’ll go far |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
# C_2016335EN.01001501.xml

| 12.9.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 335/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.9.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 335/15

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 30 June 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof — Germany) — Max-Heinz Feilen v Finanzamt Fulda

(Case C-123/15) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Taxation - Free movement of capital - Inheritance tax - Legislation of a Member State providing for a reduction in inheritance tax applicable to estates containing assets which have already formed part of an inheritance giving rise to the imposition of inheritance tax in that Member State - Restriction - Justification - Coherence of the tax system))

(2016/C 335/19)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Bundesfinanzhof

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Max-Heinz Feilen

Appellant:

Respondent: Finanzamt Fulda

Respondent:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Articles 63(1) TFEU and 65 TFEU do not preclude legislation of a Member State, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which provides for a reduction in inheritance tax in the case of inheritance by persons within a particular tax class where the estate includes assets that had already been acquired, by way of inheritance, by persons within that tax class during the 10 years prior to the acquisition, on condition that inheritance tax was levied in that Member State in respect of that earlier acquisition.

---

(1)  OJ C 213, 29.6.2015.

1

---
MD4-1000

SPECIFICATIONS

Technical drawing md4-1000 (PDF)

Explosed drawing md4-1000 (PDF)

Folded arms md4-1000 (PDF)

3D-drawing md4-1000 (PDF)

• Rate of climb: 7.5 m/s

• Cruising speed: 12.0 m/s

• Peak thrust: 118 N

• Weight: ca. 2,650 g (depending on configuration)

• Recommended load: 800 g
• Maximum load: 1,200 g

• Maximum take-off weight (MTOW): 6,000 g

• Dimensions: 1,030 mm (from rotor hub to rotor hub)

• Battery: 6S2P LiPo, 22.2V, 13000mAh

• Flat core motors: yes

• CFD optimised propeller: yes

• Closed carbon housing: yes

• IP43 protection: yes

• Temperature: -10 up to 50°C

• Humidity: max 90% r.H.

• Wind susceptibility: vibration-free images up to 6m/s

• Flight range: min. 500m with remote control, with WP up to 20km

• Service ceiling: 2000m ASL, 4500m ASL - 3-blade carbon rotors necessary

• Take off altitude: up to 4000m NN (WGS84)
# C_2016419EN.01002202.xml

| 14.11.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 419/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.11.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 419/22

---

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 21 September 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Baden-Württemberg — Germany) — Peter Radgen, Lilian Radgen v Finanzamt Ettlingen

(Case C-478/15) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Taxation - Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Swiss Confederation, of the other, on the free movement of persons - Equal treatment - Income tax - Exemption of income derived from part-time employment as a teacher with a legal person governed by public law established in a Member State of the European Union or in a State to which the Agreement on the European Economic Area of 2 May 1992 applies - Legislation of a Member State excluding from that exemption income derived from such employment with a legal person governed by public law established in Switzerland))

(2016/C 419/29)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Finanzgericht Baden-Württemberg

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Peter Radgen, Lilian Radgen

Applicants:

Defendant: Finanzamt Ettlingen

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The provisions of the Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Swiss Confederation, of the other, on the free movement of persons, signed in Luxembourg on 21 June 1999, concerning the equal treatment of employees must be interpreted as precluding the legislation of a Member State, such as the legislation at issue in the main proceedings, under which a resident national with unlimited liability to income tax who has exercised the right to freedom of movement in order to work as an employee on a part-time basis in the teaching profession for a legal person governed by public law established in Switzerland is denied a tax exemption in respect of the income from that employment whereas such an exemption would be granted if that person had been so employed by a legal person governed by public law established in that Member State, in another Member State of the European Union or in another State to which the Agreement on the European Economic Area of 2 May 1992 applies.

---

(1)  OJ C 16, 18.1.2016.

1

---
**Exhibit 32.1**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANTTO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

Pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Toreador ResourcesCorporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’sknowledge, that: 

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q forthe quarter ended June 30, 2004 (the “Form 10-Q”) of the Company fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934 and the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of,and for, the periods presented in the Form 10-Q.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 23-0219 and DA 23-0279

_________________

IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF:

MIKI L. ADAMS,

 Petitioner and Appellee,

 and

DIRK S. ADAMS,

 Respondent and Appellant.

O R D E R

_________________

Pursuant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, these causes are classified for 

submission on briefs to a five-justice panel of this Court. 

A review of the record demonstrates that both causes were appealed from the same 

District Court case, DR-2020-43. In the interest of judicial economy, the Court has 

determined to consolidate the two causes for purposes of appeal under DA 23-0219.

The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to all counsel of record and to the 

Honorable Yvonne Laird, District Judge.

For the Court,

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

January 31 2024

01/31/2024
Before the First Division,

June 10, 1958

No. 62062.

#### R. U. Delapenha & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 309489-K (New York).

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of flavoring extract, containing more than 50 percent of alcohol, similar in all material respects to that the subject of *R. U. Delapenha & Co.*v. *United States*(39 Cust. Ct. 136, C. D. 1918), the merchandise was held dutiable as follows: (1) The items entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, prior to June 6, 1951, at 30 cents per pound and 10 percent ad valorem, under paragraph 24, as modified by T. D. 51802, and (2) the items entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, subsequent to said date at 30 cents per pound and 9 percent ad valorem under paragraph 24, as modified by T. D. 52739. The merchandise was also held subject to the applicable internal revenue tax due at the time of withdrawal of said merchandise.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

Shawn Patrick Krieger,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 2:12-cv-884

Carolyn W. Colvin,

Acting Commissioner of

Social Security,

Defendant.

ORDER

This matter is before the court for consideration of the July

22, 2013, report and recommendation of the United States magistrate

judge to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b). 

The magistrate judge recommended that the plaintiff’s statement of

errors be overruled and that the court enter judgment in favor of

the Commissioner.

The report and recommendation specifically advised the parties

that failure to object to the report and recommendation within

fourteen days of the report “will result in a waiver of the right

to have the district judge review the Report and Recommendation de

novo, and also operates as a waiver of the right to appeal the

decision of the District Court adopting the Report and

Recommendation.” Doc. 22, p. 17. The time period for filing

objections to the report and recommendation has expired, and no

party has objected to the report and recommendation.

The court has reviewed the report and recommendation of the

magistrate judge. Noting that no objections have been filed and

that the time for filing such objections has expired, the court

adopts the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge (Doc.

Case: 2:12-cv-00884-JLG-TPK Doc #: 24 Filed: 08/20/13 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
22). Accordingly, the court overrules plaintiff’s statement of

errors. The court affirms the Commissioner of Social Security’s

non-disability finding and this action is dismissed. The clerk is

directed to enter judgment in favor of the Commissioner of Social

Security.

Date: August 20, 2013 s/James L. Graham 

 James L. Graham

 United States District Judge 

Case: 2:12-cv-00884-JLG-TPK Doc #: 24 Filed: 08/20/13 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
USGS HomeContact USGSSearch USGS

Astrogeology Research Program

#### U.S. Geological Survey   Scientific Investigations Map 2920  version 1.0

# Geologic Map of the Mylitta Fluctus Quadrangle (V-61), Venus

### *By*Mikhail A. Ivanov and James W. Head, III

### 2006

The Magellan spacecraft orbited Venus from August 10, 1990, until it plunged into the Venusian atmosphere on October 12, 1994. Magellan Mission objectives included (1) improving the knowledge of the geological processes, surface properties, and geologic history of Venus by analysis of surface radar characteristics, topography, and morphology and (2) improving the knowledge of the geophysics of Venus by analysis of Venusian gravity.

The Mylitta Fluctus quadrangle (V-61) is in the southern hemisphere of Venus and extends from lat 50° to 75° S. and from long 300° to 360° E. The northern third of the quadrangle covers the southern part of Lavinia Planitia, which represents a class of equidimensional lowlands on Venus (Bindschadler and others, 1992b) and is as deep as about 1.5–2 km below mean planetary radius. The southeastern part of the map area shows the western part of the upland of Lada Terra, the summit of which is about 3 km above mean planetary radius.

----

Download this map as an ~47" x 42" PDF document (sim2920.pdf; 17.7 MB)

Download the accompanying pamphlet as a 19-page PDF document (sim2920pamphlet.pdf; 976 kB)

For questions about the content of this report, contact Ken Tanaka

Suggested citation and version history

----

Download a free copy of the current version of Adobe Reader.

| Help   | PDF help   | Publications main page | Other Planetary Maps || Geologic   Division | Astrogeology Research Program  |

----

This map is available in paper form from:

USGS Information Services, Box 25286,Federal Center, Denver, CO 80225telephone: (888) ASK-USGS; e-mail: infoservices@usgs.gov

----

AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological Survey	URL: https://pubs.usgs.gov/sim/2006/2920/	Page Contact Information: Michael Diggles	Page Last Modified: December 1, 2008

----
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED August 21, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-10591 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. RAUL RAMIREZ-BENAVIDEZ, also known as Freddy Ramirez Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:05-CR-78 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Raul Ramirez-Benavidez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)

. Ramirez-Benavidez has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal . Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave toNo. 06-10591

2 withdrawis GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR. R. 42.2.
No. 65703.

#### Williams Clarke Co. and So. Cal. Import & Export *v.*United States,

protest 59/9440 (Los Angeles).

*504Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of percussion caps similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Gold-Silver & Co.*v. *United States*(36 Cust. Ct. 51, C.D. 1753), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.