alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 15







August 2, 2002

Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549

Commissioners:

We are aware that our report dated August 2, 2002 on our
reviews of interim financial information of UniSource Energy
Corporation (the Company) and Tucson Electric Power Company
(TEP) as of and for the period ended June 30, 2002 and included
in the Company's and TEP's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for
the quarter then ended is incorporated by reference in the
Company's Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-43765,
333-43767, 333-43769, 333-53309, 333-53333 and 333-53337), on
Form S-3 (Nos. 333-31043 and 333-93769), and on Form S-4 (No.
333-60809) and in TEP's Amendment No. 3 to the Registration
Statement on Form S-4 (No. 333-65143).

Very truly yours,



PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
### RE: Boiler MA**CT PreambleRule**

**Higgins, Cortney** to

: Jim Eddinger, Mary Johnson 12/20/2012 11:52 AM
Cc : RobertJ W ayland

From: "Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov> To: Jim Eddinger/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Mary Johnson/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA Cc: RobertJ W ayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

### HI Jim, Any update on the question below regarding the area source rule? Thanks, Cortney **From:** Eddinger.Jim@epamail.epa.gov [ mailto:Eddinger.Jim@epamail.epa.gov] **Sent:** Wednesday, December 19, 2012 7:02 PM **To:** Higgins, Cortney **Cc:** Wayland.Robertj@epamail.epa.gov **Subject:** RE: Boiler MACT PreambleRule Cortney, Our monitoring folks did edit those equations based on the earlier comments, but I will have them look at this comment tomorrow if they feel Additional changes areneeded. Jim

_______________ Jam es A. Eddinger Energy Strategies Group Sector Policies and Programs Division 919 - 541 - 5426 "Higgins, Cortney"
--- 12/19/2012 05:29:26 PM
--- Hi Jim, Below are a couple of interagenc y comments that have come in today on this afternoon's draft From: "Higgins, Cortney" < Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov > To: Jim Eddinger/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA Cc: RobertJ W ayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 12/19/2012 05:29 PM Subject: RE: Boiler MACT PreambleRuleHi Jim,

Below are a couple of interagency comments that have come in today on this afte rnoon’s drafts: Major Source Rule. Page 198. For consistency with equation 10, we believe the symbols X1 and Y1 in equation 11 should be small x prime (small x with a bar over the top) and small y prime (small y with a bar over the top). (Rephrased versio n of comment that was submitted by the SSC on 18 December 2012.) As an aside, in equation 10, perhaps X1 and Y1 should be Xi and Yi since it is a summation equation from i to n. Area Source Rule. Consider revising the definitions of 10

- day rolling averag e and 30

- day rolling average in the area source rule to be consistent with the major source rule to incorporate the 240 hour and 720 hour of valid operating data criteria, respectively. Both rules should probably exclude hours during startup and shutdown a s well as unit down time, from the rolling average calculations. Regards, Cortney **From:** Eddinger.Jim@epamail.epa.gov [ mailto:Eddinger.Jim@epamail.epa.gov] **Sent:** Wednesday, December 19, 2012 3:50 PM **To:** Higgins, Cortney **Cc:** Wayland.Robertj@epamail.epa.gov **Subject:** RE: Boiler MACT PreambleRule Cortney, Please replace the redline version I sent you earlie r this afternoon with this version. A few edits were ma de to the fourth year language on pages 26
- 28. 

### (S ee attached file: EO 12866 NESHAP for Major Sources Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers and Process Heaters 2060 121912 redline w 121312 v2.docx) Jim

_______________ Jam es A. Eddinger Energy Strategies Group Sector Policies and Programs Division 919 - 541 - 5426
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18
U.S.C. Section 1350)

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.
(the Company) for the annual period ended September 30, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Aviv Efrat, as Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant hereby
certify, to the best of my knowledge that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



|       |  |                        
|------ |  | -----------------------
|       |  | /s/    AVIV
EFRAT      
|Name:  |  | Aviv Efrat             
|Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer

Date: November 14, 2012
# C_2017038EN.01000502.xml

| 6.2.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 38/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.2.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 38/5

---

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 8 December 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden — the Netherlands) — Staatssecretaris van Financiën v Lemnis Lighting BV

(Case C-600/15) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 - Customs union and Common Customs Tariff - Tariff classification - Combined Nomenclature - Headings 8539, 8541, 8543, 8548 and 9405 - Light-emitting diode bulbs (LED)))

(2017/C 038/07)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Referring court

Hoge Raad der Nederlanden

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Staatssecretaris van Financiën

Applicant:

Defendant: Lemnis Lighting BV

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Combined Nomenclature in Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff, as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1214/2007 of 20 September 2007, must be interpreted as meaning that goods such as the LED bulbs at issue in the main proceedings fall, subject to the referring court’s assessment of all the facts before it, under heading 8543 of that nomenclature.

---

(1)  OJ C 48, 8.2.2016.

1

---
No. 56607.

protest 171566-K (Ogdensburg).

#### F. W. Myers & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Cole, J.

The protest was dismissed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 

          - [Docket No. RP07-339-000] 

                    The Commission's Order issued March 29, 2007,[1]                                          directed that a technical conference be held to investigate all aspects of Texas Gas Transmission, LLC's proposal to amend its tariff with respect to the capacity allocation method for its supply laterals.                 

Take notice that a technical conference will be held on Tuesday, April 17, 2007 at 10 a.m., in a room to be designated at the offices of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC. 20426. 

                    FERC conferences are accessible under section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. For accessibility accommodations please send an e-mail to                     *accessibility@ferc.gov*                     or call toll free (866) 208-3372 (voice) or 202-502-8659 (TTY), or send a fax to 202-208-2106 with the required accommodations.                 

                    All interested persons are permitted to attend. For further information please contact Jacob Silverman at (202) 502-8445 or e-mail                     *Jacob silverman@ferc.gov.*

All interested parties and staff are permitted to attend. 

Kimberly D. Bose, 

Secretary. 

# Footnotes

1.                             Texas Gas Transmission, LLC, 118 FERC ¶ 61,259 (2007).                    
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. E7-7166 Filed 4-13-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
# Official Journal C 266/2011

| | ISSN 1725-2423
  doi:10.3000/17252423.C_2011.266.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 266 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 549 September 2011 |

ISSN 1725-2423

doi:10.3000/17252423.C_2011.266.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 266

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 549 September 2011

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2011/C 266/01 | Commission communication in the framework of the implementation of the Directive 97/23/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 May 1997 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States concerning pressure equipment(Publication of titles and references of harmonised standards under the directive)
   (1) | 1 |
| | NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES |
| 2011/C 266/02 | Information communicated by Member States regarding State aid granted under Commission Regulation (EC) No 800/2008 declaring certain categories of aid compatible with the common market in application of Articles 87 and 88 of the Treaty (General Block Exemption Regulation) (1) | 18 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2011/C 266/01

Commission communication in the framework of the implementation of the Directive 97/23/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 May 1997 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States concerning pressure equipment(Publication of titles and references of harmonised standards under the directive)
   (1)

(Publication of titles and references of harmonised standards under the directive)

1

NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES

2011/C 266/02

Information communicated by Member States regarding State aid granted under Commission Regulation (EC) No 800/2008 declaring certain categories of aid compatible with the common market in application of Articles 87 and 88 of the Treaty (General Block Exemption Regulation) (1)

18

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
# C_2016335EN.01002401.xml

| 12.9.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 335/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.9.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 335/24

---

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 30 June 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Bucureşti — Romania) — Selena România SRL v Direcția Generală Regională a Finanțelor Publice (DGRFP) București

(Case C-416/15) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Commercial policy - Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 - Article 13 - Circumvention - Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 791/2011 - Open mesh fabrics of glass fibres originating in the People’s Republic of China - Anti-dumping duties - Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 437/2012 - Consignment from Taiwan - Initiation of an investigation - Implementing Regulation (EU) No 21/2013 - Extension of the anti-dumping duty - Temporal scope - Principle of non-retroactivity - Community Customs Code - Post-clearance recovery of import or export duties))

(2016/C 335/32)

Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Referring court

Curtea de Apel Bucureşti

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Selena România SRL

Applicant:

Defendant: Direcția Generală Regională a Finanțelor Publice (DGRFP) București

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 1(1) of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 21/2013 of 10 January 2013 extending the definitive anti-dumping duty imposed by Implementing Regulation (EU) No 791/2011 on imports of certain open mesh fabrics of glass fibres originating in the People’s Republic of China to imports of those same goods consigned from Taiwan and Thailand, whether declared as originating in Taiwan and Thailand or not, is to be interpreted as meaning that the definitive anti-dumping duty extended by that provision is not applicable retroactively to goods consigned from Taiwan, released for free circulation in the Union after the date of entry into force of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 791/2011 of 3 August 2011 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of certain open mesh fabrics of glass fibres originating in the People’s Republic of China, but before that of Commission Regulation (EU) No 437/2012 of 23 May 2012 initiating an investigation concerning the possible circumvention of anti-dumping measures imposed by Implementing Regulation No 791/2011, and making such imports subject to registration. Nevertheless, the anti-dumping duty imposed by Article 1(1) of Regulation No 791/2011 applies to imports of such goods, if it is established that, despite being consigned from Taiwan and declared as originating in that country, those goods in fact originate in the People’s Republic of China.

---

(1)  OJ C 346, 19.10.2015.

1

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

EASTERN DIVISION 

CAROLYN S. LAWSON, : Case No. 2:12-CV-0323 

 : 

 Plaintiff, : JUDGE ALGENON L. MARBLEY 

 : 

 v. : 

 : Magistrate Judge Abel 

COMMISSIONER OF : 

SOCIAL SECURITY, : 

 : 

 Defendant. : 

 

OPINION AND ORDER 

On June 10, 2013, the United States Magistrate Judge recommended this action be 

remanded to the administrative law judge. The Magistrate Judge recommended that the 

administrative law judge determine if there are good reasons to find that Dr. DeShetler’s opinion 

is not controlling, and if it is not, then the administrative law judge should evaluate all the 

medical source evidence and determine what weight to assign each source, including the treating 

source. The Magistrate Judge also recommended that the administrative law judge evaluate Mr. 

Craig’s opinion in accordance with SSR 06-03p and consider Plaintiff’s vocational factors in 

accordance with SSR 85-15. Report and Recommendation, Doc. 15. Although the parties were 

advised of their right to object to the recommendation and of the consequences of their failure to 

do so, there has nevertheless been no objection. 

The Report and Recommendation, Doc. No. 15, is ADOPTED AND AFFIRMED. The 

action is REMANDED to the administrative law judge, pursuant to Sentence 4 of 42 U.S.C. 

§ 405(g), for further consideration of the aforementioned opinions and evidence. 

 

Case: 2:12-cv-00323-ALM-MRA Doc #: 16 Filed: 09/12/13 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
The Clerk shall enter FINAL JUDGMENT pursuant to Sentence 4 of 42 U.S.C. 

§ 405(g). 

s/Algenon L. Marbley_________ 

ALGENON L. MARBLEY 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

DATE: September 12, 2013

Case: 2:12-cv-00323-ALM-MRA Doc #: 16 Filed: 09/12/13 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
# C_2015311EN.01002101.xml

| 21.9.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 311/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.9.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 311/21

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Łodzi (Poland) lodged on 22 June 2015 — Criminal proceedings against G.M. and M.S.

(Case C-303/15)

(2015/C 311/25)

Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Referring court

Sąd Okręgowy w Łodzi

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

G.M. and M.S.

Question referred

Question referred

Is Article 8(1) of Directive 98/34/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 June 1998 laying down a procedure for the provision of information in the field of technical standards and regulations (OJ 1998 L 204, p. 37) (1) to be interpreted as meaning that in the event of failure to communicate regulations, which are considered to be technical regulations, different consequences are possible: as regards regulations which concern the freedoms which are not subject to the restrictions of Article 36 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, the failure to communicate must have the consequence that those regulations cannot be applied; whereas, as regards regulations which concern the freedoms which are subject to the restrictions of Article 36 of the Treaty, the national court, which at the same time is an EU court, may assess whether those regulations, despite the failure to communicate, comply with the requirements of Article 36 of the Treaty and can be applied?

1

---

(1)  OJ 1998 L 204, p. 37.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>         5
<CIK>             0000101295
<NAME>            UNITED-GUARDIAN, INC.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                       2,218,511
<SECURITIES>                                 2,295,571
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,105,490
<ALLOWANCES>                                    54,949
<INVENTORY>                                  1,070,583
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,053,132
<PP&E>                                       4,752,123
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,415,449
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,851,885
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          595,878
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       489,904
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,367,328
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,851,885
<SALES>                                      5,853,810
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,853,810
<CGS>                                        2,874,747
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,874,747
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 134
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,943,874
<INCOME-TAX>                                   725,500
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,218,374
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,218,374
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .25


</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA
RE: Docket Number 2022 -KI -0188 State Of Louisiana in the Interest of D. W. 

### City Court of East St. Tammany Case #: 212152 

### St. Tammany Parish

On Application for Rehearing filed on 10/03/ 2022 by State of Louisiana Rehearing 

# j P-n e,A

z: Mitchell R. Theriot 

## C14 Wayne Ray Chutz i Chris Hester

Date 

## XT 12 2022 Rodd Naqui
# C_2017239EN.01000602.xml

| 24.7.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 239/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.7.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 239/6

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 18 May 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf — Germany) — Hummel Holding A/S v Nike Inc., Nike Retail BV

(Case C-617/15) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Intellectual property - Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - EU trade mark - Article 97(1) - International jurisdiction - Action for infringement brought against an undertaking with its seat in a third country - Second-tier subsidiary with its seat in the Member State of the court seised - Definition of ‘establishment’))

(2017/C 239/08)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Hummel Holding A/S

Applicant:

Defendant: Nike Inc., Nike Retail BV

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 97(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the European Union trade mark must be interpreted as meaning that a legally distinct second-tier subsidiary, with its seat in a Member State, of a parent body that has no seat in the European Union is an ‘establishment’, within the meaning of that provision, of that parent body if the subsidiary is a centre of operations which, in the Member State where it is located, has a certain real and stable presence from which commercial activity is pursued, and has the appearance of permanency to the outside world, such as an extension of the parent body.

---

(1)  OJ C 38, 1.2.2016.

1

---
<PAGE>
Page 1

   
IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 201 OF REGULATION S-T, THIS FORM 10-Q OF THE
REGISTRANT DATED NOVEMBER 14, 1995, IS BEING FILED IN PAPER PURSUANT TO A
TEMPORARY HARDSHIP EXEMPTION.
    


                     SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                            Washington, DC  20549

                                 FORM 10-Q/A


            (X) QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
                   OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


For Quarterly Period Ended September 30, 1995

Commission File Number 1-6798

                       _______________________________


                      TRANSAMERICA FINANCE CORPORATION
           (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


           Delaware                                          95-1077235
(State or other jurisdiction of                           (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)                           Identification No.)



                           1150 South Olive Street
                       Los Angeles, California  90015
                  (Address of principal executive offices)
                                 (Zip Code)

                               (213) 742-4321
            (Registrant's telephone number, including area code)



     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to
such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes  x       No 

     Number of shares of common stock, $10 par value, outstanding as of close
of business on November 14, 1995: 1,464,285 shares.

     The registrant meets the conditions set forth in General Instructions
H(1)(a) and (b) of Form 10-Q and is therefore filing this Form with the
reduced disclosure format.

<PAGE>
Page 2

                               Amendment No. 1

     Transamerica Finance Corporation, the Registrant, hereby amends the
title page of Form 10-Q for the Quarterly Period Ended September 30, 1995 to
include the temporary hardship legend on the top of page 1.



                                 SIGNATURES


     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


TRANSAMERICA FINANCE CORPORATION
(Registrant)

Burton E. Broome
Vice President, Controller and
  Assistant Secretary

Date: November 15, 1995