UNCLASSIFIEDII FOR PUBLIC RELEASE 

UNITED SI'ATES DISTRICT corR'!.'· 

FOR TIlE DJ:'\TRICT OF COL.C\lBIA 

) 

MOHA\1.!\1ED i\H\l[J) SLA..1Vl ) 

AL-KHATEEB (ISl\ 689), 

I 

Petit i.on cr, ) 

) 

) Ci"il l\o. 09-745 (ReL.) 

) 

BAlt·:\CK OBA.MA, e! al., ) 

) 

Respondents. ) 

---------------) 

MEl\'IORANDUM & ORDER 

Petitioner is challenging the legality afhis detention at the United States Naval Base in 

Gllantanamo Bay, C'llba CGuantanamo"}, Before the Court. is petitioner"st\lotion [J 186J tD 

Com pel or, in the i\ Ilernative, for Leave to Seek Discovery. As described herein, the Court shall 

grant petitioner leave tel seek certain discovery. 

'fhe Court is operating under the Casei\1anagement Order ('"eMU') issued by Judge 

IJogan ofthis Court in the consolidated Guantanamo habeas cases (T'v'fisc. No. 08-4..2) on 

November 6, 2008, as amended on Decemher 16, 2008.! The subjects of petitioner's mOTion aloe 

I'f'he Amended CMO was later amended fUlther by Judge Walton of this Court. Gherebi 

1'. Bush, Ci\'. "t\o. 04~1164, Order [797J (D.D.C. Dec. 19,2(08) (\Valton, J.).Because that Order 

was issued before petitioner's case ·was transfcn-cd from Judge Walton to the underslgned 

member of the Court, it is binding on petitioner's case. Ho\!,rever, Judge Walton's amendmems 

do not affect Amended CMO § I.E, which is the only section at issue for petitioner's requests. 

UNCLASSIFIEDII FOR PUBLIC RELEASE 
UNCLASSIFIEDII FOR PUBLIC RELEASE 

Petitioner's moti0D seeks to compel production, or, in the alternative, leave to seek 

discovery of three categories of evidence: 

A., Petitioner's l\lotioll to Compel 

Petitioner'S motion first seeks to compel respondents' production oftlle 

1Petitioncr originally included a fourth request for "a \\Titten descri )tion of how the 

but that request was later withdra~'T1. (See Reply at 3 n.l.) 

2
 

UNCLASSIFIEDII FOR PUBLIC RELEASE 
UNCLASSIFIEDII FOR PUBLIC RELEASE 

under Amended C/\IO § I.E. 1. Section I.E. I requires the government tIl 

disc.lose. if requested by the petitioner. "any documents or objects in the govenl:11eITl's 

possession that the government relies (H110 JUSTify detention" lan1ong'ol,her thingsL P:::tili,mer 

B. Petitioner's Motion, in the Alternative, for Leave to Seek Discovel1' 

J
 

UNCLASSIFIEDII FOR PUBLIC RELEASE 
UNCLASSIFIEDII FOR PUBLIC RELEASE 

In the altcmaliv.:. petitioner tnDVCS 1eave to seek ,I i ~:t"t\','l"I"\' under 

J:,mended C\10; LE.2. Section I.E.2 Stlm~s that 

It]he !vlerits .Judge may, for good cause. permit the petitioner to obtain limitcO 

discovery beyond that described in [Section I.E.] I· Discovery requests shall .. 

(1) be Dnrruwly tailored, not open-ended; (:2 spec if) the soughr: :::: 

explain wh] the r"cquest, if gWI1I;:Q, is likely to pr()(!uce evidence that 

demonstrates lhal petitioner's detention is unltl\\'ful; and (4 e.xplain why the 

request..:d discovery \\ill enable the petitioner to rebut the factual basis [~~)," his 

detention \"'ithout unfairly disrupTing or unduly burdening the government. 

Amended C1\'IO § I.E.: Icitations omitted), Petitioner's discovery reques1 \vi 1I be evaluated 

according to this standard. 

Petitioner's request is certainly bOlh narrowly tniJoreJ and specitic. Petiti :mer is 'l.sking 

a finite number llsed OJ: a sped fie Dccasion with a single detainee. 

Petitioner's request alse appears not to be un lairly disruptive or unduly burdensome to the 

government: tl1;;' Rerum's i~)otnote nOled that th~accounl was accessible as 

as 2007, and respondents do not indicate that it is no longer accessible. The only remaining 

issue. then, is whether petitioner has 5ho\\"n that it is likely that his request, if granted, would 

produce evidence demonstrating that his detention is unl.awful. The Court concludes that. for a, 

least some of his requests, petitioner has met that standard. 

It is therefore likely that petitioner's request will 

produce evidence that will weaken the govcmment's justificati':"I!i f0r his detemiotl,
 

However, not an of the specific requests made b~v petitioner are likely to show he is being
 

unlawfully detained. 

UNCLASSIFIEDII FOR PUBLIC RELEASE 
UNCLASSIFIEDII FOR PUBLIC RELEASE 

Such broad disclosure would go 

beyond what is allovved by Amended CMO § I.E.2. 

To bring petitioner's discover)' requests within the confines of Amended C!'vfO § I.E,2, 

the Court will order the following: First.. if, using reasonably available4 information, respondents 

41n accordance with the Court's other orders dealing \"lith discovery under Amel1ded 

CMO § I.E, the Court \vilI only grant discovery as to "reasonably available" evidence. In this 

context, "reasonably available" evidence means evidence contained in any information reviewed 

by attorneys preparing factual returns for all detainees held at Guantanamo Bay or any other 

tinited Stales military facility; it .is notlimited to the evidence discovered by attorneys preparing 

htcrual returns for this petitioner. See GJrerebi v. Bush, Civ. No. 04-1164, Order [797] (D.D.C. 

Dec. 19,2008) (\\'alton, J.) (amending slightly Amended CMO § LD.1). 

5 

UNCLASSIFIEDII FOR PUBLIC RELEASE 
UNCLASSIFIEDII FOR PUBLIC RELEASE 

(referenced in Return Paragraph 25 IDutJ.101e 3.1 

In accordance with the above \IenHlfandun1, it is 

ORDER}]) thai if, using reasonably anliJable inJe)fJ11J.l10n, respondents can determine 

_ ' a"o';, 1" ·r'!l/>l' .~L. I .. ; t l.ll L.. '­

ORDERED rhm h all other rt:spects petitioner's !\/101il)l1 [1 186] is DE1\TED; and il is 

Ji.lrthcr 

ORDERED that all disclosures ordered in this Order shall occur within 30 days of thi:.~

date of this Order. 

so ORDERI::D. 

~c~ ROY . C. LAMBERTII 

CHIEF JUDGE 

6 

UNCLASSIFIEDII FOR PUBLIC RELEASE