p. 1


# OAR Box 

# 1787 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 148 ) ll-A-1 7 Docket Number: 

# A-90-3 7

Printed 11/5/2008 9:21:16

AM Sheet 148 of 149P. 2 

### A-90-3 7



## plj g B RO W ll
_ EF A AI R DOCKE

T INFORMATIO N COLLECTION REQUES T FO R4 0 CF

RPAR T 5 1 AN D 5 2 PREVENTIO N O F SIGNIFICAN T DETERIORATIO N AN D NONATTAINMENT NE W SOURCE REVIEW
b y Danie l Charle s Mussatti , Economis t Innovativ e Strategie s an

d Economic s Grou

p Air Qualit y Managemen

t Divisio n Offic e o f Air Qualit y Plannin g an

d Standard s Office o f Air an d Radiatio n Unite d State s Environmenta l Protectio n Agency MD-1 2 RTP , Nort

h Carolin a2771 1 Septembe r 8 , 199 5V * * P. 3



### INFORMATION COLLECTION REQUES T FOR4 0 CF

RPAR T 5 1 AN D 5 2 PREVENTIO N O F SIGNIFICAN T DETERIORATIO N AN D NONATTAINMENT NE W SOURCE REVIEW TABL E O F CONTENT S

1 . IDENTIFICATION O F TH E INFORMATIO

N COLLECTIO

N 1 1(a ) TITLE O F THE INFORMATION COLLECTION REQUES T (ICR) 1 1(b ) ABSTRAC

T / EXECUTIVE SUMMAR

Y 1 2
. NEE D FORAN

D US E O F TH

E COLLECTIO N 3 2(a) NEED /

AUTHORIT

Y FO R THE COLLECTIO N 3 2(b ) US E /

USERS O F THE DAT

A 3 3 . TH

E RESPONDENT S AN

D TH E INFORMATIO

N REQUESTE

D 5 TABL E 3- 1 PRIMAR

Y NS RRESPONDENT S B Y SI C CODE 5 3(a ) RESPONDENT S /

STANDAR

D INDUSTRIA

L CLASSIFICATIO N (SIC ) CODE S 5 TABL E 3- 2 DETERMINATION O F NS RSOURCE BASELIN E 6 3(b ) INFORMATIO N REQUESTE D 6 3(b)(1 ) DAT

A ITEM S 6 3(b)(2 ) RESPONDEN T ACTTVTnES 6 4 . TH

E INFORMATION COLLECTE D - AGENC

Y ACTIVITIES , COLLECTION METHODOLOGY , AN

D INFORMATIO

N MANAGEMENT 7 4(a ) STAT

E AN D LOCA L AGENCY ACTIVITIE S 7 4(b ) COLLECTIO N METHODOLOG Y AN D MANAGEMEN

T 7P. 4

5 . REGULATOR

Y FLEXIBILITY , ENVIRONMENTAL EQUITY , AN D OTHE R COLLECTION CRITERI A 8 5(a) SMAL

L ENTITY FLEXIBILITY 8 5(a)(1 ) METHODOLOG Y 8 TABL E 5- 1 INDUSTR

Y MULTIPLIER

S 8 5(a)(2 ) MEASURE S T O AVER T IMPACT S O N SMAL

L ENTITIE S 8 5(a)(3 ) MEASURE S T O MITIGAT E IMPACT S ON SMAL

L ENTITIE S 9 5(b ) COLLECTIO N SCHEDUL E 9 5(c ) ENVIRONMENTA L JUSTIC E CONSIDERATION S 9 5(c)(1 ) PURPOS E O F ANALYSI S 9 5(c)(2 ) MITIGATIO N STRATEGIE S 1 0 5(d ) NONDUPLICATIO N 1 0 5(e ) CONSULTATION S 1 0 5(f ) EFFECT S O F LES S FREQUEN T COLLECTION 1 0 5(g ) GENERA

L GUIDELINE S 1 0 5(h ) CONFIDENTIALITY AN D SENSITIV

E QUESTION S 1 1 5(eh(l ) CONFIDENTIALITY 1 1 5(h)(2 ) SENSITIVE QUESTION S 1 1 6 . ESTIMATIN G TH E BURDE

N AN D COS T O F TH

E COLLECTION 1 2 6(a ) ESTIMATIN G RESPONDEN T BURDE N AN D COST S 1 2 TABL E 6- 1 RESPONDENT BURDE N AN D COST S 1 2 6(b ) ESTIMATIN G TH E STAT E AN D LOCA L AGENCY BURDE

N AN D COS T .. . 1 3 TABLE 6- 2 STAT E AN D LOCAL AGENC

Y BURDE

N AN D COST S 14P. 5

6(c ) ESTIMATING AGENCY BURDE N AN D COS T 1 4 TABLE 6- 3 FEDERAL BURDE N AN D COST S 1 5 6(d) REASON S FO R CHANG E I N BURDE

N 1 5 6(e ) BOTTO

M LIN E BURDE

N HOUR S AN D COSTS /

BURDE N TABLE S 1 6 TABLE 6- 4 BOTTO

M LINE EFFECT S O F 199 0 CLEA N AI RAC T REQUIREMENT S 16 6(f ) BURDE

N STATEMEN

T 1 6 APPEND K

A INFORMATIO N REQUIREMENT S 1 7 TABLE A- l RESPONDENT DAT A AN D INFORMATIO

N REQUIREMENT S FOR PREPARIN G PAR

T C (PSD) CONSTRUCTIO N PERMIT S 18 TABL E A- 2 RESPONDENT DAT A AN D INFORMATIO

N REQUIREMENT S FOR PREPARIN G PAR

T D (NONATTAINMENT) CONSTRUCTION PERMIT S 1 9 TABLE A- 3 STATE DAT A AN D INFORMATIO

N REQUIREMENT S
. . 2 0 SE C 505 : PERMIT APPLICATION S 2 1 SE C 504 : PERMIT REQUIREMENT S AN D CONDITION S 2 2 4 0 CF R 70.5 ® STANDAR

D APPLICATIO N FOR

M AN D REQUIRE

D INFORMATIO N 2 3P. 6

1 . IDENTIFICATIO N O F TH E INFORMATIO N COLLECTIO N 1 (a ) TITL E O F TH E INFORMATIO N COLLECTIO N REQUES T (ICR ) Thi s repor t

i s entitle d Informatio n Cnllprtin n Reques t fo r 4 0 CF R par t

5 1 an d 5 2 Preventio n o f

Significan t Deterioratio n and Nonattainmen t Ne w Sourc e Review . 1(b ) ABSTRACT /

EXECUTIVE SUMMAR

Y Th e regulation s covere d unde r thi s analysi s are containe d in part s 5 1 and 5 2 o f titl e 4 0 o f th e Code of

Federal Regulations (CFR) which specif y requirement s fo

r th e preparation , adoption , an

d submitta l o f implementatio n plans ; an

d approva l an d promulgatio n o f implementatio n plans , respectively
. Specificall y 4 0 CF R 51.16 6 an

d 52.2 1 specif

y requirement s fo

r preventio n o f

significan t deterioratio n (PSD ) programs , and 4 0 CF R 51.16 5 specif y requirement s fo

r nonattainmen

t NS R programs . Fo r an y existing rule , § 3507(g ) of th e Paperwor

k Reductio n Act

limits th e amoun

t of tim e tha t aDirecto r

ma y approv e acollection of

informatio n t o thre e years . Therefore , th e 199 2 IC R fo r part s 5 1 an

d 5 2 NS R expire s i

n 1995
. Th

e purpos e of

thi s IC R i s t o updat

e th e informatio

n collectio n analysi s fo

r th e 4 0 CF R part s 5 1 an

d 5 2 New Sourc e Revie

w (NSR) regulation s t o accommodat

e requirement s superimposed o n th e rul e b

y th e Clea n Ai r Ac t amendments o f

199 0 tha t becam e effectiv e afte r th e approva

l o f th e 199 2 ICR. i Excep t

fo r informatio n collection s i

n notice s o f propose d rule s o r

thos e exempte

d unde r th e emergenc

y processing provision s o f

44 U.S.C
. § 3507(j) , th e Paperwor k Reductio n Ac

t require s EP

A t o solici t comment s on eac

h propose d informatio

n collection , includin

g th e renewa

l o r modificatio

n o f an y existing ICR
. Thi s informatio n collectio n must

mee t specifi c standard s befor

e submitta l t o OMB
. The EP

A certifie s tha t th e informatio

n collection i s necessar

y fo r th e prope r performanc e o f

EPA' s functions , an

d tha t i t ha s practica

l utility ; i s not

unnecessaril

y duplicative of

informatio n EP A otherwis e ca

n reasonabl y access ; an

d reduces , t o th e exten

t practicabl e an

d appropriate , th e burden on person s providing th e informatio

n t o or fo r th e EPA
. Th e informatio

n foun d i n thi s Information Collection Reques t (ICR) i s required fo

r th e submitta l of acomplet e permi t application fo

r th e constructio n or

modificatio

n o f al l majo r ne w stationar y source s of

pollutant s i

n attainmen

t an d nonattainmen

t areas , a s wel

l a s fo r applicable mino r stationar y source s o f

pollutants
. The Agenc y anticipate s annualize

d direct cost s t o source s fo

r th e NS R progra

mt o b e approximatel

y $4 1 million , fo

r ane t increas e o f

$1 3 million , abou

t 4 6 percen t mor e tha n th e curren t 199 2 IC R burde

n of $2 8 million
. Thes e cost s represen t th e direc t administrativ e cost s fo

r 32 0 par t C majo r NS R sources , 59 0 par

t D majo r NS R sources , an

d 19,500 mino

r NS R sources . O n ape r sourc e basis , thes e cost s ar e approximatel

y $3 3 thousand fo

r eac h par t C source , $2 0

A n IC R wa s submitte d i n Jun e 199 4 fo r change s t o th e Ne w Sourc e Revie w progra mmandate d b y th e 199 0 Amendment s t o th e Clean Ai r Ac t with respec t

t o part s C an d D o f

th e Act
. A n ongoin g effor t t o streamlin e an d simplif y NS R regulation s i s undergoin g development , an d th e IC R for tha t NS R Refor mrulemakin g wil l b e subjec t to revie w an d comment an d approva l unde r

th e Paperwork Reductio n Ac t

requiement s tha

t becom e effectiv e Octobe r 1 , 199S
.
4 0 CF R part s S l an

d 5 2 PS D an d NonatUinmen

t NS R Informatio

n Collectio n Reques t Septembe

r 8,199 5 Pag e 1P. 7

thousand fo

r par t D sources , an

d $36 8 fo r eac h mino r NS R source . The Agenc

y estimate s th e annualize d cos t o f Ne w Sourc e Revie

w t o State s an

d loca l agencie s t o b e approximatel y $1 2 million , $ 3 millio

n fo r par t C sources , $ 2 millio

n fo r par t D sources , an

d $ 7 millio n fo r mino r NS R sources . Thi s constitute s a

n increas e of

$ 2 millio n ove r th e cost s o f

th e 199 2 NS R ICR
. The Agenc y expect s Federa

l cost s wil l b e $46 5 thousand , 146 percen t mor e tha n th e 199 2 ICR' s $18 9 thousand burde

n cost . Thi s IC R addresse s th e recor d keeping an

d reportin g burden to th e Federa l government , industr

y respondents , an

d Stat e an d loca l ai r pollutio n contro l agencie s subject to th e requirement s unde

r 4 0 CF R part s 5 1 an

d 5 2 an d th e Clea n Ai r Act Amendment s of

1990
. Th e burde n estimate s ar e calculate d fo r th e three-yea

r perio d beginnin g Januar

y 199 6 and endin g Januar

y 1999
. Th e type s of

informatio n collectio n activitie s addresse d i n thi s IC R ar e include d in Appendix A
.

4 0 CF Rpart s 5 1 an d 5 2 PS D an d Nonattainmen

tNS RInformatio

n Collection Reques

tSeptembe

r 8,199 5 Page 2P. 8

2 . NFF D FO RAN D TTSF . O F TH F CO T TFCTIO N 2(a ) NEED /

AUTHORIT

Y FO R THE COLLECTION Sectio n 11 0 of

th e Clea n Ai r Act (CAA ) require s al l State s t o submit a n implementatio n pla

n which contain s apreconstructio n review progra mfo r al l majo r ne w o r modifie d stationar y sources , includin g an

y provision s necessar

y fo r thi s progra

mt o mee t th e specifi c requirement s o f

part s C and D of

titl e I of th e CA A relate d t o majo

r construction
. Sectio n 11 0 o f

th e CA A require s tha

t n o ne w o r modifie d stationar y source , i n conjunctio n wit h existin g sourc e emission s i n th e sam e area , ca n interfer e wit h th e attainmen

t o r maintenanc e of

th e Nationa

l Ambien t Air Qualit y Standard s (NAAQS)
. Thi s effectivel y mean s tha t n o sourc e ca

n construc t

without securing apermi t

to ensur e tha t th e objective s of th e 199 0 CA

A Amendment s ar e met . Part C o f titl e I o f th e CA A outline s specifi c constructio n requirement s fo r ne w and modifie d source s constructin g in area s tha t do no t violate th e NAAQS
. Thes e requirement s are mor e commonl

y referre d t o a s th e preventio n o f significan t deterioratio n (PSD ) rules , which require aprospectiv e majo r ne w o r modifie d sourc e to : (1 ) demonstrat e tha t th e NAAQ S an

d increment s wil l no t

b e exceeded , (2 ) ensur

e th e applicatio n o

f bes t availabl e contro l technolog y (BACT) , an d (3 ) protec t

Federal Clas s I area s fro

madvers e impacts , includin g advers e impact s on ai r

qualit y relate d value s (AQRVs)
. Similarly , par

t D of titl e I of th e CA A specifie s requirement s fo r majo r ne w and modifie d source s constructin g in area s designate d a s nonattainmen t fo r aNAAQ S pursuant

t o sectio n 10 7 of th e CAA
. Th e par

t D provision s als o appl

y to majo r sourc e permittin g i

n th e Northeas t Ozone Transpor

t Regio n a s establishe d unde r section 18

4 of th e Act a s amended
. Th e par t D rule s generally require aprospectiv e majo r constructio n projec t

to : (1 ) ensur

e th e applicatio n o

f control s which will achiev e th e lowes t achievabl e emissio n rat e (LAER) , (2 ) certif y tha t al l majo r source s in aStat

e owned o r

controlle d by th e sam

e perso n (o r

persons ) ar e in complianc e wit

h al l ai r emission s regulations , an

d (3 ) secur

e reduction s in existin g sourc e emission s to compl

y wih t specific statutor

y offse t ratio s an d ar e otherwise , equa

l t o o r greater tha n thos e necessar

y t o show attainmen

t and maintenanc e o f

th e applicabl e NAAQ S (offsets)
. 2(b ) US E /

USERS O F THE DAT

A Befor e th e owne

r o r operato r of afacilit y ca n commenc e constructio n o r modificatio n o f it s source , i t

mus t compl y wit h al l applicabl e constructio n permi t requirements
. Th e owne

r o r operato r of astationar

y sourc e mus t

develop o r

collec t al l relevant

informatio n no t otherwis e availabl e to th e PA
. Th e P A review s th e applicatio n material s submitte d b y th e owne r o r operato r and either

declare s th e permi t

applicatio n complet

e fo r processin g o r provide s th e owne

r o r operato r guidanc e on ho w t o correc t th e deficiencie s i n th e application
. Th e applican

t the n collect s th e additiona

l dataidentifie d by th e P

A i n orde r fo r th e permi t applicatio n to b e deemed "complete. " Although sufficien t informatio n mus t

b e submitte d by th e applican

t befor e it s permi t

ca n b e classified a s complete , som e additiona

l clarifyin g

4 0 CF Rpart s 5 1 an d 5 2 PS D an d Nonattainmen tNS RInformatio n Collectio n Reques tSeptembe r 8,199 5 Pag e 3P. 9

informatio n ca

n b e submitted a

t alater date b y th e applican

t to assis t EP A in processin g th e permi t application
. Fo r majo r source s to b e constructe d o r modifie d in attainmen

t areas , th e permi t applicatio n informatio n i s use d by th e P A to determin e whether : (1 ) th e sourc e will caus e o r contribut e t o aviolatio n o

f th e NAAQ S an

d ai r qualit y increments , (2 ) whethe

r BACT wil l b e applied , an

d (3 ) whethe

r th e source' s emission s wil l adversely affec t an y Federal Clas s I areas , includin g AQRV s i n thes e areas . Fo r majo r source s t o b e constructe d o r modified i n nonattainmen

t areas , th e permi t

applicatio n informatio n i s use d by th e P A t o (1 ) determin e whethe r th e sourc e wil l apply LAER , (2 ) determin e whethe r th e sourc e wil l achiev e th e require d emission s offsets , an d (3 ) determin e whethe

r th e sourc e ha s demonstrate d tha t al l other of it s majo r source s in th e sam

e Stat e are in complianc e wit

h al l applicabl e ai r

emission s regulations
. Onc e th e applicatio n i s complete , th e P A make s apreliminar

y determinatio n regardin g th e approvabilit

y of th e permi t

application , an

d make s thi s determinatio n together wit h th e applicatio n and supportin g informatio n availabl e t o th e publi c fo r a t leas t 3 0 days
. Th e P

A mus t the n respon d t o publi c comment s an d tak e actio n on th e fina

l permit
. Th e fina

l permi t mus t b e acte d upon b y th e P

A within on e yea

r of receip t of acomplet e application
. I n addition , th e publi c an

d othe r permi t applicant s ma

y us e som e o f th e dat acollected
. EP A operate s aRACT/BACT/LAE R Clearinghous e (RBLC ) whic h contain s man

y BACT an

d LAE R determination s t o ai d applicant s an d reviewer s i

n identifying reasonabl e an d availabl e contro l technologies
. Th e Clea n Ai r Ac t amendment s require tha

t th e BAC T o r LAE R informatio n in each permi t mus t b e gathere d by th e P

A an d submitte d fo

r entr y into th e RBL

C databas e a s areferenc e fo

r makin g futur e contro l technolog y determinations
. Informatio n on BAC T an d LAE R determination s i s als o availabl e to th e publi c through th e Nationa l Technica l Informatio n Service
.

4 0 CF Rpart s 5 1 an d 5 2 PS D an d Nonattainmen tNS RInformatio n Collectio n Reques tSeptembe r 8,199 5 Pag e 4P.1 0

3 . TH F RF.SPONnFNT S AN D TH F INFORMATIO N RFQTTFSTF D TABL E 3- 1 PRIMAR Y NS R RESPONDENT

S B Y SI C COD E Stea m Electri c Plant s Petroleu m Refinin g Chemica l Processe s Natura l Ga s Transpor

t Pul p an d Pape r Automobil e Manufacturin g Pharmaceutical s 49 1 29 1 28 1 49 2 26 1 an d 26 2 37 1 28 3 3(a) RESPONDENT S /

STANDAR

D INDUSTRIA

L CLASSIFICATIO N (SIC ) CODE S Tabl e 3- 1 list s th e thre e digi t SIC group s th e Agency expect s wil l compris e th e majorit y o f respondent s affecte

d by Ne w Sourc e Review
. Thes e categorie s wer e chose n becaus e o

f their histori c relativ e incidenc e i n seeking NS R permits , a s establishe d i n prio r ICR s and confirme d by anationwide ai r

inventor y performe d b y th e Agency i n 1986-87
. Thes e industrie s hav e bee n use d a s th e basi s fo

r impac t analysi s sinc e tha

t inventory
. 3(a)(1 ) ESTIMATION O F TH E NUMBE

R O F SOURCES SUBJECT T O NE W SOURC E REVIE W Four ICR s hav e bee

n prepare d fo

r previou s NS R rulemakings , th e origina l NS R IC R o f Jul y 1985 , a

n updat e fo r PM-1 0 done i

n Apri l 1988 , anothe

r updat e fo r nitrogen dioxid

e (NO J increment s i

n Octobe r 1988 , an d a n IC R fo r th e CM A Exhibi t A , written i

n Jul y 1989
. The 198 9 CM A Exhibi t A IC R serve s a s th e baselin e fo r thi s ICR , modifie

d t o includ

e thos e change s resulting fromth e 199 0 CA A requirement s an

d suc h ne w informatio

n abou t th e information collectio n proces s tha

t ma y hav e bee n gathere d sinc e th e las t

IC R update
. Table 3- 2 display s th e change s i n applicabl e majo r an d mino r NS R source s sinc e th e 198 9 CM A Exhibi t A ICR
. The 198 9 CM

A Exhibi t A IC R estimated 20,37 0 majo r an d mino r NS R sources , o f which 37 0 wer

e considered majo

r unde r part s C (30 0 sources ) an

d D (7 0 sources)
. Statutor y change s require d b

y th e CA A Amendment

s of 199 0 increased th e numbe

r o f majo r source s t o whic

h part s C (2 0 sources ) an

d D (52 0 sources ) applied
. Overall , th e 199 0 CA A requirement s fo

r part s C an

d D resul t i n ane t increas e of

4 0 applicable sources. 2 Th e numbe r o f Currently , streamlinin

g effort s ar e unde r wa y for NSR . Thes e "NS RReform " revision s were complete d in 199 5 an d will reduc

e th e numbe r o f par tC an d D applicabl e sources t

o 23 1 an d 42 4 respectively. A n IC Rfo r NS RRefor

m wil l follo w thi s IC

Rupdate .
4 0 CF Rpart s 5 1 an d 5 2 PS D m d Nonattainmen

tNS RInformatio

n Collectio

n Reques tSeptembe

r 8,199 5 Pag e 5P.1 1

applicable mino

r source s decreased slightl

y unde r th e 199 0 CA

A requirements , t o 19,500
. The numbe r o f applicable source s on th e botto mlin e o f Table 3- 2 represent s th e analytica l baseline use d fo r th e determination o f

source , Stat

e an d loca l agency , an

d Federa l burde n an d cost s fo r thi s IC R update
. TABL E 3-2

DETERMINATIO N O D NS R SOURC E BASELIN E ITE M PS D Part D MINO R TOTA L 1 98 9 CM A Exhibi t A Baselin e Change s Du e t o 199 0 CA A Requirements 30 0 2 0 7 0

52 0 20,00 0

(500 ) 20,37 0

4 0 BASELIN E FO R 199 5 NS R IC R UPDAT E 32 0 59 0 19,50

0 20,41 0 3(b ) INFORMATIO

N REQUESTE

D 3(b)(1 ) DAT

A ITEM S Table s A-l , A-2 , an

d A- 3 o f Appendi x A summariz

e th e responden

t an d Stat e dat aan d informatio n requirement s whic

h owner s or

operator s o f

majo r source s mus t

includ e i n PS D an d nonattainmen

t NS R constructio n permi

t applications
. Appendi

x A als o include s th e appropriat e CFR reference s fo

r th e dataan

d informatio

n requirement s whic

h pertain t o th e requirement s unde r par t 5 1 whic h gover n th e wa y State s implemen

t NS R programs . Fo r

eac h referenc e i

n par t 51 , correspondin g languag e wil l b e foun d i n par t 52
. Typically , owner s or

operator s o f

mino r source s submi

t informatio n t o demonstrat

e tha t the y ar e exemp t fromth e majo

r sourc e constructio n permi

t requirements ; therefore , thes e owner s or operator s wil

l no t hav e t o compl

y wit h al l o f th e requirement s show

n i n Table s A- l an

d A-2
. 3(b)(2 ) RESPONDEN T ACTIVITIE S Table 6- 1 list s th e activities , burden , an d estimated cost s of

th e NS R activitie s require d unde r 4 0 CF R part s 5 1 an

d 52
. Thes e activitie s includ e thre e broa

d categories : Preparatio n an d Planning ; Dat aCollection an d Analysis ; am

d Permi t Application
. Withi

n eac h o f thes e categories , furthe r subdivisio n of asource' s activitie s ca

n b e found
. Th

e Agenc y anticipate s i

t wil l take 32 0 par t C majo r source s approximatel

y 71 1 hour s each , o r

atotal of 22 8 thousand hour s t o complet e a n NS R application
. Eac h o f th e 59 0 par

t D NS R source s wil

l requir e 44 5 hours , or

atotal o f 26 3 thousand hour s eac

h yea r t o complet

e par t D NS R applications
. Eac h mino r sourc e wil

l requir e 8 hour s t o complet

e it s NS R application requirements , fo r atota l o f 15 6 thousan d hours
.

4 0 CF Rpart s 5 1 an d 5 2 PS D an d Nonattainmen tNS RInformatio n Collectio n Reques t Pag e 6 Septembe r 8,199 5P.1 2

4
. TH E INFORMATIO N COLLECTE D ~ AGENC Y ACTIVITIES
. COLLECTIO N METHODOLOGY
. AN

D INFORMATIO N MANAGEMEN T 4(a ) STAT

E AN D LOCA L AGENCY ACTIVITIE S Tabl e A- 3 summarize s th e dataan d informatio

n requirement s whic

h Stat e an d loca l agencie s mus t

meet . Table A- 3 als o show s th e par t 5 1 reference s fo

r th e dat aan

d information requirement s specified
. The appropriat e languag e fromth e Act , 4 0 CFR 5 1 an d 4 0 CFR 5 2 fo

r Stat e an d loca l agencie s i s include

d a t th e en d o f Appendi x A , a s well
. 4(b ) COLLECTIO

N METHODOLOG

Y AN D MANAGEMEN

T The owner s an

d operator s of

ne w or modifie d stationar y source s affecte

d b y th e NS R regulation s wil

l b e responsible fo

r submittin g constructio n permi

t application s t o th e PA
. The P A wil l lo g i n permi t applications , stor

e application s i

n acentra l filing locatio n a

t th e PA , notif

y th e FL M (i f applicable) , transmit

copie s o f eac h application t o EPA , an

d ente r summar y dat afo r eac h application int

o th e EPA' s NS R BBS
. Onc e constructio n permit s hav e bee n approved , th e reviewin g authorit y wil l submi t contro l technology informatio n t o EPA' s RBL

C database
. Becaus e th e constructio n permit s an d associated contro l technology determination s ar e performe d o n acase-by-cas e basis , th e regulation s wil l no t contain additiona

l forms whic

h owner s o r operator s wil

l hav e t o fill out

an d submi t t o th e PA
. State s wil

l likel y us e thei r curren t permi t application forms fo

r NS R purposes . Qualifie d personnel wh o wor

k fo r th e PA wil

l perfor mpermi t review s an

d chec k th e qualit y o f dat asubmitte

d b y th e applican

t on acase-by-cas e basis
. The applican t wil l b e required t o submi t informatio n on how th e datawer

e obtained (e.g., indicat

e whethe r emission s dat awer

e obtained throug h th e us e of emission s factor s o r

tes t data) an d ho w calculation s wer

e performed
. The P A personnel wil

l chec k dat aqualit

y b y reviewin g tes t dat aan d checking engineering calculations , an

d b y reviewin g contro l technology determination s fo r simila r sources . The RBL

C an d othe r source s wil

l b e reviewed fo

r informatio n o n contro l technology determination s mad e fo r source s simila

r t o th e source s include

d i n th e permi

t application
. Confidentia

l informatio

n submitted b y th e applican

t wil l b e handled b

y th e permi

t reviewing authority' s confidentia l informatio n handlin g procedures
. Th

e public wil

l b e provided th e opportunit y t o revie w apermi t application , includin

g FL M findings, b

y obtainin g acop y fromth e permi

t reviewin g authorit y o r b y attending th e publi c hearing
. The public ca n als o find summar

y datao n al

l applicant s i

n th e NS R BBS
. The NS R regulation s wil l no t requir e informatio

n throug h an

y typ e o f survey . Table 6- 2 list s th e Stat

e an d loca l agenc y burde n an d cost s associate d wit

h th e majo r NS R permitting rule , a s modifie

d b y th e propose d Refor

mchange s of

thi s analysis
. A s i s th e cas e wit h th e respondents , Stat

e an d loca l agencie s who wil

l approv e NS R permit s wil

l onl y have start-up cost s fo r an y give n permit
. Consequently , while th e Stat e o r loca l agenc y wil l approv e man

y permit s eac

h year , th e annua

l burde n fo r tha t functio n i s simpl y equa l t o th e burden foun

d i n an y on e year .

4 0 CH I part

s 5 1 an d 5 2 PS D an d Nonattainmen

tNS RInformatio

n Collectio

n Reques tSeptembe

r 8,199 5 Page 7P.1 3

5
. REGULATOR Y FLEXIBILITY . ENVIRONMENTAL EQUITY
. AN D OTHE R COLLECTIO N CRITERI A 5(a) SMAL

L ENTIT Y FLEXIBILIT

Y Th e Regulator

y Flexibilit

y Act require s regulator

y agencies , upon regulator y action , to prepare severa

l document s determine d by , among othe r things , th e attribute s of

th e regulator

y actio n bein g taken
. Thes e include : (1 ) aCertification , (2 ) a n Initia l Regulator

y Flexibilit

y Analysi s (IRFA) , an

d (3 ) aFina

l Regulator

y Flexibilit

y Analysi s (FRFA)
. I

n addition , th e agencie s mus t

assur e through variou s mechanism s tha t small entitie s ar e give

n a n opportunit

y t o participate i n th e rulemakin g process . Th e Environmenta l Protectio n Agency ha s revise d thes e guideline s suc

h that , fo r an y ne w rul e subject

to th e Regulator

y Flexibilit

y Act , a regulator y flexibilit y analysi s i s require d i f

th e rul e wil l hav e an

y economi c impact , howeve r small , on an

y small entitie s tha

t are subject

t o th e rule
. Thi s sectio n o

f th e repor t provide s a

n analysi s to assis t

EP A i n completing a

n IRF A fo r th e propose d NS R Refor

mregulations
. A

n initia l regulator y flexibilit y screenin g analysi s showe

d tha t th e propose d change s would not have an y advers e impact

o n smal l entities
. 5(a)(1 ) METHODOLOG Y For IC R approval , th e Agenc

y must demonstrat

e tha t i t "has taken al

l practicabl e step s t o develo p separat e an d simplifie d requirement s fo

r smal l businesse s an

d othe r smal l entities " ( 5 CF

R 1320.6(h))
. The ter

m"smal l entities " include s smal

l businesses , smal

l governmenta

l jurisdictions , an d smal l organizations
. An

y disproportiona

l impac t fro mth e NS R regulation s will b e incurre d b y majo r source s subject

t o par t C o r D requirements
. Th e Economi c Impac t Analyse s (EIAs ) which accompanie d th e 199 5 NS R Refor mrulemakin g an

d th e 199 5 NS R par

t C an d D CA A mandated change s include d aRegulator y Flexibilit

y Ac t Screening Analysi s (RFASA) whic h encompasse d th e entire univers e of applicabl e majo

r source s fo

r thi s ICR
. Base

d o n th e methodology incorporate d i n thos e NS R EIAs , th e Agenc y believe s tha

t th e current

par t 5 1 an d 5 2 NS R regulation s d o no t constitut e adisproportionat

e burden o

n smal l entities
. 5(a)(2 ) MEASURE S TO AVER T IMPACT S O

N SMAL L ENTITIE S Th e EP A ma y exemp t one o r severa l sourc e categories , i

n whole o r i n part , fromth e requirement s unde

r titl e V i f i t i s determine

d tha t complianc e wit

h thes e requirement s would b e "impracticable , infeasible , or unnecessaril

y burdensome"
. However , th e Agenc y may , unde

r n o circumstances , exemp

t amajo r sourc e o f ai r pollution
. Since th e impact s of NS R regulation s whic h ma y impact smal l entitie s appl

y t o majo r source s of

ai r pollution , irrespectiv e o f commercia l size , there i s littl e roo mfo r regulator y flexibilit y t o aver t th e impac t o f th e propose d rulemakin g on smal l entitie s throug h exemption
.

4 0 CF Rpart s 5 1 an d 5 2 PS D an d Nonattainmen tNS RInformatio n Collectio n Reques tSeptembe r 8,199 5 Pag e 8P.1 4

5(a)(3 ) MEASURE S T O MITIGAT

E IMPACT S O

N SMAL L ENTITIE S Du e t o th e majo

r sourc e characteristi c o f

al l NS R permitted units , onl

y one optio n i s availabl e t o mitigat

e th e disproportionat

e impac t of th e NS R Refor

mrule s o n smal

l entities
. Implementation o f

smal l busines s stationar

y sourc e technica

l an d environmenta

l complianc e assistanc e program s a s calle d fo r i n section 507 o f

th e Ac t (a t th e Federa

l an d Stat e levels ) ca

n reduc e th e reportin g burde

n of smal l entitie s whic

h ar e subjec t t o majo r NSR
. Thes e program s ma y significantl

y alleviat e th e economic burde

n on smal l source s b y establishing : 1 ) program s t o assis t smal l businesse s wit

h determinin

g wha t Act requirement s appl

y t o their source s an

d whe n the y apply , an

d 2 ) guidanc e on alternativ e contro l technology an d pollutio n preventio n fo

r smal l businesses
. 5(b ) COLLECTION SCHEDUL E The NS R IC R updat

e must b e approved befor

e Octobe r 1 , 1995
. Responden

t schedule s unde r th e regulation s o f

part s 5 1 an

d 5 2 depen

d on constructio n schedules
. I n general , each affecte d sourc e i s require d t o submi t a n application a s aprerequisit e t o receiving aconstructio n permit
. Preparatio n o f

aconstructio n permi

t application i s aone-time-onl y activit y fo r eac h project involvin g constructio n o f

ane w sourc e or

modificatio

n o f a n existing source . Th

e NS R permi t regulation s wil

l no t requir e periodi c reportin g o r

surveys . 5(c ) ENVIRONMENTA L JUSTICE CONSIDERATION S 5(c)(1 ) PURPOS E O F ANALYSI S Executiv e Orde

r 12898 , dated Februar

y 11 , 1994 , require s tha

t eac h Federa l agenc y mak e achievin g environmenta

l justic e (EJ) par

t o f it s mission
. T o d o this , agencie s ar e require d t o identif

y and addres s disproportionately hig h advers e healt

h o r environmenta

l effect s of agency program s on minorit y an d low-incom

e populations
. A s par

t o f thi s pla n agencie s mus t conside r E J issue s whe

n ne w rule s ar e proposed
. Thi s sectio n o f th e repor t provide s suppor t to EP A in it s effort s to addres s E J issue s relate d t

o NS R regulations
. EP

A solicite d guidanc e fro

mth e Agency' s Offic e of

Environmenta

l Equit y (OEE) ; th e Offic e o f

Policy , Plannin g and Evaluatio n (OPPE) ; an d th e Offic e of

Soli d Wast

e an d Emergenc y Respons e (OSWER ) o n agenera

l se t o f issue s which should b e considere d in preparatio n of thi s report . Thes e issue s include d descriptiv e statistics , industria l concerns , geographi c concerns , and mitigatio n strategies
. Th e dat ai n thi s sectio n show tha t in man y of th e nonattainmen

t area s affecte

d b y NSR , housing densit

y i s considerably highe

r tha n th e Stat e an d nationa l averages . Whe

n subset s o

f thes e area s correspon d to area s wit h disproportionately high minorit y o r low-incom

e population s th e agenc y should b e especially sensitiv e t o th e potentia l fo r advers e impact s o n minoritie s an

d lowe r incom e groups .

4 0 CF Rpart s 5 1 an d 5 2 PS D an d Nonattainmen

tNS RInformatio

n Collectio

n Reques tSeptembe

r 8,199 5 Pag e 9P.1 5

5(c)(2 ) MITIGATIO N STRATEGIE S A s describe d above , th e primar y effects of

th e NS R regulation s relevant t o consideratio n of

E J wil l no t b e apparen

t whe n considere d a

t th e nationa

l level
. Th e mos t significan t E J concern s aris e a

t th e loca l level , whe

n th e sitin g o

f asourc e in a

n are awould hav e disproportionat

e effects on minorit

y o r low-incom

e populations
. Thi s analysi s provide s a n effectiv e mechanis mfo

r beginnin g to addres s E

J concern s relate d to NS R permi t decision s nationwide
. Whil

e th e CienaAi

r Ac t Amendment

s rulemakin

g doe s no t includ e sepcifi c strategie s t o mitigat

e th e disproportionat

e impac t o f NS R permitting , it s predecessor s did includ e suc h consideration s i

n th e for mo f increased opportunitie s fo

r persona l empowermen

t throug h th e publi c commen

t process . 5(d) NONDUPLICATION The informatio

n collection activitie s required unde r th e NS R regulation s are no t routinel y performe d elsewher

e b y EPA
. However , simila

r informatio n ma y b e collecte d during th e developmen

t o f certain environmenta

l impac t statement s (EIS)
. I

n suc h cases , regulation s an

d policie s requir

e tha t informatio n collected fo

r EIS' s an d NS R program s b e coordinate d t o th e maximu mexten t possible s o a s t o minimiz

e duplicating th e collection o f data
. Som

e o f th e require d information als o ma y alread y b e availabl

e fromState s or

othe r Federa l agencies
. However , eve

n whe n thes e dataar

e available , the

y ar e no t generall y adequat e t o addres s completel y th e relevan

t NS R requirements
. 5(e ) CONSULTATION S Extensiv e publi c participatio n too k plac e i n th e developmen

t o f th e origina

l NS R regulation s whic

h addressed th e basi c informatio n collection requirements
. Implementation o f th e change s mandated by th e 199 0 Ac t Amendment

s als o involve

d extensiv e publi c participation , i n tha t public review an

d commen t ar e required a

t bot h Stat e an d Federa l level s fo r th e adoptio n an

d Federa l Appprova

l o f th e resultan

t Stat e Implementation Pla

n rerquirements
. Thi s IC R wa s furthe r informe d b y comments fromth e Clea

n Ai r Ac t Advisor y Committee (CAAAC ) o n th e 199 0 Clea n Ai r Act Amendments an

d th e NS R Refor

mSubcommittee o f

th e CAAA

C whic h wa s composed o f

Federal , State , an

d loca l agencies , environmenta

l groups , an

d industr y representatives
. 5(f ) EFFECT S O

F LES S FREQUEN

T COLLECTIO

N The informatio

n require d t o b e submitte

d b y eac h permi t applican t woul d b e submitted o

n aone-time-onl

y basis
. Whe

n a n existin g sourc e wishe s t o modif

y o r expan d afacilit y alread y i n operation , mos t

o f th e informatio

n submitte d would pertain t o th e ne

w construction
.

4 0 CF Rpart s 5 1 an d 5 2 PS D an d Nonattainmen tNS RInformatio n Collectio n Reques tSeptembe r 8,199 5 Pag e 1 0P.1 6

5(g ) GENERA

L GUIDELINE S The recor d keeping an

d reportin g requirement s contained i n th e NS R regulation s do no t excee d an y o f th e Paperwor

k Reductio n Ac

t guideline s contained i

n 5 CF R 1320.6
. 5(h) CONFIDENTIALIT Y AN D SENSITIV

E QUESTION S 5(h)(1 ) CONFIDENTIALIT Y Confidentialit

y i s no t a n issu e fo r thi s rulemaking
. I

n accordanc e wit

h titl e V , th

e informatio n tha t i s t o b e submitte

d b y source s a s apar

t of their permi t applicatio n an

d update ; application s fo

r revision s an

d renewal s i s amatte

r o f publi c record
. T o th e exten t tha t th e informatio n require d fo

r th e completenes s o f

apermi t i s proprietary , confidential , o r o f anatur e tha t i t could impai

r th e abilit y of th e sourc e t o maintai

n it s marke

t position , tha

t informatio n i s collected an

d handle d according t o EPA' s policie s se t fort h i n titl e 40 , chapte

r 1 , par t 2 , subpar t B~Confidentialit

y of Busines s Information (se e 4 0 CF R 2 ; 4 1 F R 36902 , Septembe

r 1 , 1976 ; amende d b y 4 3 F R 39999 , Septembe

r 8 , 1978 ; 4 3 FR 42251 , Septembe r 28 , 1978 ; 4 4 FR 17674 , March 23 , 1979)
. 5(h)(2 ) SENSITIV

E QUESTION S The consideratio n o f

sensitive questions , (i.e. , sexual , religious , persona l o r othe r privat e matters) , i s no t

applicable t o thi s rulemaking
. Th e informatio

n gathere d fo

r purpose s o f establishin g a n operatin g permi

t fo r asourc e d

o no t includ e persona l dat aon an

y owne r o r operator .

4 0 CF Rpart s 5 1 an d 5 2 PS D an d Nonattainmen

tNS RInformatio

n Collection Reques

tSeptembe

r 8,199 5 Page 1 1P.1 7

6 . ESTIMATIN G TH E BURDE N AN D COS T OF TH E COLLECTIO N 6(a) ESTIMATIN G RESPONDEN T BURDE N AN D COST S Table 6- 1 display s th e responden t burde n an d cost s associate d wit

h th e NS R progra

ma s codifie d i n 4 0 CF R part s 5 1 an

d 52
. Typically , th e annualize d cos t fo r Table 6- 1 would b e established a s th e discounted ne t presen t value o f th e strea mof cost s tha t would occu

r ove r th e
TABL E 6- 1 RESPONDEN T BURDE N AN D COSTS

Activit y 1 . Par t C (PSD ) A .

B .

C .

D . Preparatio n an d Plannin g Determinatio n o f Complianc e Requirement s Obtai n guidanc e o n Dat a Need s Preparatio n o f BAC T Engineerin g Analysi s Dat a Collectio n an d Analysi s Ai rQualit y Modelin g Determinatio n o f Impac t o n Ai rQualit y Relate d Value s Pre-constructio n Ai rQualit y Monitorin g Post-constructio n Ai rQualit y Monitorin g Permi t Applicatio n Preparatio n an d Submitta l o f Permi t Applicatio n Publi c Hearing s Revision s t o Permi t TOTA L II . PAR T D (Nonattainment ) A
.
B
.

C
.

D
. Preparatio n an d Plannin g Determinatio n o f Complianc e Requirement s Obtai n guidanc e o n Dat a Need s Dat a Collectio n an d Analysi s Preparatio n o f LAE R Engineerin g Analysi s Demonstrat e Offset s Prepar e Analysi s o f Alternativ e Sites , Processes , etc
. Ai rQualit y Modelin g Permi t Applicatio n Preparatio n an d Submitta l o f Permi t Applicatio n Publi c Hearing s Revision s t o Permi t TOTA L III . MINO R NS R Prerar e an d Submi t Permi t Applicatio n III . TOTAL S Unit s
320 32 0 32 0 32 0 320 32 0 32 0 32 0 32 0 320

590 59 0 59 0 590 590 590 590 590 590
19.50 0 Hour s Pe r

Uni t
8 6 8 6 8 6 20 2 5 0 5 0 5 0 4 9 3 3 1 6 71 1

7 5 7 5 2 0 4 0 6 0 10 0 3 7 2 5 1 2 44 5 8 Tota l Hour s
27,52 0 27,52 0 27,52 0 64,64 0 16,00 0 16,00 0 16,00 0 15,68 0 10,56 0 5.12 0 227,62 0
44,25 0 44,25 0 11,80 0 23,60 0 35,40 0 59,00 0 21,83 0 14,75 0 7.08 0 262,55 0 156.00 0 RA C mn Annua l

Cost * $1,23 8 $1,23 8 $1,23 8 $2,90 9 $72 0 $72 0 $72 0 $70 6 $5 3 $23 0 $10,23 8 $1,99 1 $1,99 1 $53 1 $1,06 2 $1,59 3 $2,65 5 $98 2 $66 4 $31 9 $11,81 6 $7,02 0 S?ft.n7 S Al l cost s ar e i n thousand s o f 199 4 dollars .

4 0 CF Rpart s 5 1 an d 5 2 PS D an d Nonattainmen tNS RInformatio n Collectio n Reques tSeptembe r 8,199 5 Pag e 1 2P.1 8

lif e o f th e permi t progra mor th e ICR , whicheve

r i s shorter
. However , i

n th e cas e o f

NSR , there ar e onl y up-fron t costs . Al l reportin g an

d monitoring cost s associate d wit h th e implementation o f asource' s pollutio n managemen t pla n ar e incorporate d int

o th e requirement s o f

th e NSP S , Enhanced Monitoring , an

d th e appropriat

e SIP
. Therefore , th e cost s of th e NS R rul e fo

r th e secon d an d thir d year s o f th e ICR , a s modifie

d b y thi s proposal , are zero , an d th e ne t presen t valu e o f th e cost s o f

th e NS R rule s ar

e equa l t o th e cos t

of th e first yea r outlay
. Additionally , sinc e th e cos t

of NS R permitting i s incurred "u p front", i t i s asun k cos t t o th e sourc e an

d doe s no t requir e amortizatio n ove

r th e lif e o f th e source . Therefore , th e annualize d cos t o f asource' s NS R permi

t application i s equa

l t o th e first

yea r outla y a s well
. Respondent s includ

e owner s or

operator s o f

majo r stationar y source s whic

h wil l b e subjec t t o th e constructio n permi

t requirement s unde

r EPA' s NS R regulations
. Th e annua l responden t burde n associate d wit

h majo r sourc e PS D an

d nonattainmen

t NS R constructio n permi t activitie s i s $2 2 million
. Th e annua l mino r NS R responden

t burde n fo r constructio n burde

n activitie s add s a

n additiona

l $ 7 millio n t o tha t figure, fo r atota l o f $2 9 millio n i n responden

t burde n fo r th e curren t NS R progra

mcodifie d unde r 4 0 CF R part s 5 1 an

d 52
. Thes e cost s ar

e determined b

y multiplyin

g th e estimated numbe

r of hour s fo r eac h burde n categor y b y $45.0 0 pe

r hour
. Thi s hourl

y rate i s th e sam

e a s tha t use d i n prior NS R ICR s an

d bot h par t 7 0 an d par t 7 1 operatin g permi

t ICRs , an d represent s amixtur

e o f in-hous e an

d contracto r

effort
. Thi s analysi s conclude s th e curren

t Ne w Sourc e Revie

w permitting progra

mdoe s no t

resul t i n asignifican

t cos t t o society , a s define

d unde r Executiv e Orde

r (EO ) 12866 , section 3(f)(1)
. 6(b ) ESTIMATIN G TH

E STAT E AN D LOCA L AGENCY BURDE

N AN D COS T Table 6- 2 display s th e Stat

e an d Loca l Agenc y burde n an d cost s associate d wit

h th e NS R progra ma s codifie

d i n 4 0 CF R part s 5 1 an

d 52
. A s wa s foun

d fo r th e responden

t costs , th e annualize d cos t fo r Table 6- 2 would normall

y b e established a s th e discounte d ne t presen t valu e o f th e strea mo f cost s tha t would occu

r ove r th e lif e of th e permi t progra mor th e ICR , bu

t fo r NSR , there ar e onl y up-fron t costs . The Stat

e an d Loca l Agenc y cost s o f th e NS R rul e fo

r th e secon d an d thir d year s o f th e ICR , a s modifie

d b y thi s proposal , ar

e zero , an d th e ne t presen t valu e of th e cost s o f th e NS R packag e i s equa

l t o th e cos t

of th e first yea r outlay
. Becaus e th e cos t

o f NS R permitting occur s "up front", i t i s asun k cos t t o th e sourc e an

d doe s no t requir e amortizatio n ove r th e lif e o f th e source . Therefore , th e annualize d Stat e an d Loca l Agenc y cost s fo r NS R ar e th e sam e a s th e initia

l outla y a s well
. Th

e annua l Stat e an d Loca l Agenc y burde n cos t associate d wit h majo r sourc e PS D an

d nonattainmen

t NS R constructio n permi

t activitie s i s $ 5 million
. The annua l mino r NS R Stat e an d loca l agenc y cos t fo r constructio n activitie s add s a n additiona

l $ 7 millio n t o tha t figure, fo r atota l o f $1 2 millio n i n Stat e an d loca l agenc y burden cost s fo

r th e curren t NS R progra

mcodifie d unde r 4 0 CF R part s 5 1 an

d 52
. Thes e cost s are determined b y multiplyin g th e estimated numbe

r o f hour s fo r eac h burde n categor y b y $34.0 0 pe

r hour
. Thi s hourl y rate i s th e sam

e a s tha t use d i n prior NS R ICR s an

d bot h par t 7 0 an d par t 7 1 operatin g permi t ICRs , an d represent s amixtur

e o f in-hous e an

d contracto r

effort
. Thi s analysi s conclude s th e curren t Ne w Sourc e Revie

w permitting progra

mdoe s no t

resul t i n asignifican

t cos t t o society , a s define

d unde r Executiv e Orde

r (EO ) 12866 , section 3(f)(1)
.

4 0 CF R part s 5 1 an

d 5 2 PS D an d Nonattainmen t NS R Informatio n Collectio n Reques t September

8,199 5 Pag e 1 3

### TABLE 6- 2 STAT E AN

D LOCA L AGENC Y BURDE

N AN D COST S P.1 9

Activit y Unit s Hour s Pe r Uni t
3 6 2 0 1 6 8 2 4 3 2 8 2 4 4 0 4 0 8 1 6 Tota l

Hour s
11,52 0 6,40 0 5,12 0 2,56 0 7,68 0 10,24 0 2,56 0 7,68 0 12,80 0 12,80 0 2,56 0 5.12 0 Tota l

Cost * $39 2 $21 8 $17 4 $8 7 $26 1 $34 8 $8 7 $26 1 $43 5 $43 5 $8 7 $17 4 PAR T C (PSD ) A . Atten d Preapplicatio n Meeting s B
. Answe rResponden t Question s C
. Lo g I n an d Revie w Dat a Submission s D
. Reques t Additiona l Informatio n E
. Analyz e fo ran d Provid e Confidentialit y Protectio n F
. Prepar e Complete d Application s fo rProcessin g G
. Fil e an d Transmi t Copie s H
. Prepar e Preliminar y Determinatio n I
. Prepar e Notice s fo ran d Atten d Publi c Hearing s J
. Applicatio n Approva l K
. Notificatio n o f Applican t o f PA Determinatio n L
. Submitta l o n Informatio n t o BAC T / LAE R t o RBL C 32 0 32 0 32 0 32 0 32 0 32 0 32 0 32 0 32 0 32 0 32 0 32 0 M
. Tota l 27 2 87,04 0 $2,95 9 II
. PAR T D (Nonattainment ) A
. Atten d Preapplicatio n Meeting s B
. Answe rResponden t Question s C
. Lo g I n an d Revie w Dat a Submission s D
. Reques t Additiona l Informatio n E
. Analyz e fo ran d Provid e Confidentialit y Protectio n F
. Prepar e Complete d Application s fo rProcessin g G
. Fil e an d Transmi t Copie s H
. Prepar e Preliminar y Determinatio n I
. Prepar e Notice s fo ran d Atten d Publi c Hearing s J
. Applicatio n Approva l K
. Notificatio n o f Applican t o f PA Determinatio n L
. Submitta l o n Informatio n t o BAC T / LAE R t o RBL C 59 0 590 590 59 0 590 59 0 590 590 59 0 59 0 59 0 59 0 7

1 0 8 4 4 1 2 4 8 1 8 1 6 2 1 6 4,13 0

5,90 0 4,72 0 2,36 0 2,36 0 7,08 0 2,36 0 4,72 0 10,62 0 9,44 0 1,18 0 9.44 0 $14 0

$20 0 $16 0 $8 0 $8 0 $24 1 $8 0 $16 0 $36 1 $32 1 $4 0 $32 1 M
. Tota l III
. MINO R NS R Preparatio n o f Determinatio n an d Notificatio n o f Applican t III
. TOTAL S

* Al l cost s ar e i n thousand s o f 199 4 dollars . 59 0 19.50 0 10 9 64,31 0

1 0 195.00 0 $2,18 7 $6.63 0 mus n «• " 77<

i 6(c ) ESTIMATIN G AGENCY BURDE N AN D COS T EP A Regiona l Offices typicall

y revie w majo r NS R permits
. Th

e EP A expect s it s revie

w of NS R permit s t o consis t

o f th e task s listed i

n Table 6-3 , wit

h atota l burde n of approximatel

y 1 4 thousand hour s a

t acos t o f $46 5 thousand dollars
. Th

e cos t estimat e use s awag e an

d overhea d rate of $3 4 / hou r (based on aFedera

l wag e rate a

t th e Grad e 11 , ste p 3 leve l fo r th e 199 4 pa y schedule , adjuste

d fo r overhea d an d othe r appropriat

e costs. ) Thi s wag e rate i s consisten t wit h previou s NS R an

d operatin g permit s analyses
.

4 0 CF Rpart s 5 1 an d 5 2 PS D an d Nonattainmen tNS RInformatio n Collectio n Reques tSeptembe r 8,199 5 Pag e 1 4TABL E 6-3 FEDERA L BURDE N AN D COSTS P.2 0

Activit y A . Revie

w an d Verif

y Applicabilit

y Determinatio n B . Revie

w Contro l Technology Determinatio n C . Evaluat

e Offset s D . Evaluat

e Ai r Qualit

y Modelin g E . Evaluat

e Alternativ

e an d Secondar

y Impac t Analysi s F . Evaluat

e Clas s I Are a Analysi s G . Administrativ

e Tasks H . TOTA L
* Al l Costs ar e I n thousand s o f 199 4 dollar

s Unit s 910 910 910 910 910 91 0 91 0 Hour s Pe r

Uni t 2 3 1 4 2 2 1 Tota l

Hour s 1,82 0 2,73 0 91 0 3,64 0 1,82 0 1,62 0 91 0 Tota l

Cost * $6 2 $9 1 $3 1 $12 4 $6 2 $6 2 $3 1 1 6 13,65 0 $46 6 6(d ) REASON S FOR CHANG E I N BURDE

N Th e purpos e o f

thi s rulemakin

g i s t o updat

e th e existin

g IC R fo r Ne w Sourc e Review a s codifie d i n 4 0 CF R part s 5 1 an

d 5 2 an d a s influence

d b y th e 1990 Ac

t Amendments
. The Paperwor k Reductio n Ac

t require s a n updat e t o a n existing IC R ever

y thre e year s t o accoun

t fo r ne w informatio

n an d change s i

n th e rul e whic

h ma y hav e taken plac e within th e thre e yea r period
. Thi s update s indicate s tha

t change s t o th e NS R progra msinc e th e 199 2 IC R update constitut e a n increas e i n burde n an d cost s t o sources , State s an d loca l agencies , an

d th e Federa

l government . Thi s i s du e t o certain requirement s o f th e 1990 CA

A par t C an d D requirement s whic

h State s wer e t o implemen

t regardles s o f

th e timin g o f commensurat

e regulator y changes
. I

n particual r thes e requirement s lowered th e nonattainment

- are amajo r sourc e threshold s fo

r source s of

Ozone precursor s an

d PM-10
. Consequently , som e source s tha

t wer e considered mino

r fo r purpose s of ne w sourc e review unde

r th e 199 2 IC R have bee

n re-designate d a s major
. Fo r industr y respondents , th e burde

n estimated i

n thi s IC R i s 7 percen

t highe r tha n i n th e par t C IC R baseline
. Fo r par t D sources , th e burde

n increase s b

y 74 3 percent . Ther

e i s acommensurat

e decreas e of 500 unit s subjec

t t o mino r NS R a s aresul

t o f applicabilit

y change s impose

d b y th e 199 0 CA

A requirements
. The Agenc

y anticipate s respondent s wil l incu r a n annua l increas e i n permitting cost s o f $1 1 millio n du e t o thes e mandated changes , fo r atotal cos t

o f $2 9 millio n pe r year . State/loca l agencie s receiv e equiproportiona l changes
. Applicabilit

y change s imposed b

y th e 199 0 CA A Amendments increas e cost s t o State s an d loca l agencie s fo

r par t C NS R source s b

y approximatel

y 7 percen t pe r yea r ove r th e cost s of

th e pre-199 0 regulation s (199 2 ICR) , from $2. 8 millio n pe r yea r t o $ 3 million
. Par

t D sourc e cost s increas e b

y 744 percent , from.2 5 millio n annuall y t o $2. 2 million
. The Agenc

y expect s th e Federa

l burde n t o increas e a s well
. Unde

r th e classification schem

e prior t o th e 199 0 CA

A Amendments , th e Agency , primaril y th e Regions , reviewed 37 0 par t C an d D majo r sourc e applications
. Th

e curren t par t C an d D definition s a s established b y th e 199 0 CA

A Amendments increase s th e numbe r o f majo r sourc e application s b

y 47 0 pe r year , fo r a n increas e i

n Agenc y burde n an d cost s o f 14 6 percent , o r

$27 6 thousand pe

r year .

4 0 CF R part s 5 1 an

d 5 2 PS D an

d Nonattainmen t

NS R Informatio n Collectio n Reques t Pag e 1 5 September8,199 5P.2 1

6(e ) 

### BOTTO M LIN

E BURDE NHOUR S AN D COST S / BURDE NTABLE S

TABL E 6-4 NS R PROGRA M REFLECTIN G TH E 199 0 CLEA N AI R AC T AMENDMENTS

Numbe r o f Source s Burde n Hour s Respondent s State/Loca l Federa l Annualize d Cos t * Respondent s Stat e / Loca l Federa l Pai l C (PSD ) 32 0
227,62 0 •7,04 0 4,80 0 $10,69 9 $2,96 9 $16 3 Tota l

Par t D (Non attainment ) 69 0
262,66 0 64,31 0 8,85 0 $11,81 6 $2,18 7 $30 1 Mino r NS R

166,00 0 195,00 0 0 $7,02 0 $6,63 0 $ 0 Par t C (PSD )

71 1 27 2 1 6 $33.1 2 $9.2 6 $0.6 1 Pe r Uni t

Par t D (Non attainment )

44 6 10 9 1 6 $20.0 3 $3.7 1 $0.6 1 Mino r NS R

8 1 0 0 $0.3 6 $0.3 4 $0.0 0

• I n thousand s o f 199 4 dollars . 6(f ) BURDE

N STATEMEN

T Th e informatio

n collection requirement s of th e curren t NS R progra

mhav e bee

n submitted fo

r approva l t o OM B unde r th e Paperwor

k Reductio n Act , 4 4 U.S.C
. 350 1 et . seq . A n IC R documen t ha s bee n prepare d b

y th e EP A an d acop y ma y b e obtained fromSand

y Farmer , Information Policy Branch (2136) , U.S
. Environmenta l Protectio n Agency , 40 1 M St. , Washington , D.C
. 20460 , (202 ) 260-2740
. Reques t IC R No . 1713.01
. Th e averag e annua

l burde n t o respondent s fo

r thi s collection of

information i s approximatel y 50 6 thousand hour s pe

r yea r fo r permitted units , or

71 1 hour s fo

r eac h par t C PS D sourc e (227,52 0 total burde

n hours ) an

d 44 5 hour s fo

r eac h par t D nonattaimen

t sourc e (262,55 0 tota

l burde n hours)
. Thi s include s tim

e fo r reviewin g instructions , searching existing dat asources , gathering an

d maintainin

g th e dat aneeded , an

d completin

g an d reviewin g th e collectio n o f information
. Sen d comments regarding th e burde n estimat e or an y othe r aspec t o f thi s collectio n o f information , includin

g suggestion s fo

r reducing thi s burde

n to : Grou p Leader , Integrate d Implementation Grou

p (MD-12) , U.S
. Environmenta l Protectio n Agency , RTP , Nort h Carolina , 2771 1 marked , "Attention : Des k Office r fo r th e EPA. " The final rul e wil l respond t o an

y OM B o r publi c comments on th e informatio n collection requirement s contained i n thi s proposal
.

4 0 CF Rpart s 5 1 an d 5 2 PS D an d Nonattainmen tNS RInformatio n Collectio n Reques t Pag e 1 6 Septembe r 8,199 5P.2 2

APPEND K A INFORMATIO

N REQUIREMENT SP.2 3

TABL E A-l . RESPONDENT DAT A AN D INFORMATION REQUIREMENT S FOR PREPARING PAR

T C (PSD) CONSTRUCTION PERMIT S Requirement

s Current Regulatio n Reference Descriptio n of

th e nature , location , desig n capacity , an d typica l operatin g schedul e Detaile d schedul e for

constructio n Descriptio n of

continuou s emissio n reductio n system , emissio n estimates , an

d other informatio n needed to determin e tha t BACT i s used Ai r qualit y impact , meteorological , an d topographica

l dat a Nature an d exten t of , an d ai r qualit y impact s o

f genera l commercial , residential , industrial , an d other growt h in are aof sourc e Us e of ai r qualit y model s to demonstrat

e complianc e wit

h NAAQ S an

d incremen

t A demonstratio n tha

t th e benefit s o

f th e propose d sourc e significantl y outweigh th e environmenta l an d socia l cost s imposed a s aresul t

o f it s location , construction , o r modification 40CFR51.166(n)(2)(I )

40CFR51.166(n)(2)(ii ) 40CFR51.166(n)(2)(iii ) 40CFR51.166(n)(3)(I ) 40CFR51.166(n)(3)(ii ) 40CFR51.166(k)&(l ) No t acurren t requirement ; (Propose d a s ane

w requirement) Informatio n necessar

y t o determin e impac t

on AQRV s i

n Clas s I 4 0 CF

R 51.166(n)(4 ) area s Air qualit y monitorin g dat a Impairmen

t of visibility , soils , an

d vegetatio n Air qualit y impac t resultin g fro

mgenera l commercial , residential , industrial , an

d other growt h associate d wit

h sourc e Writte n notic e of

propose d relocatio n fro

mportabl e sourc e Descriptio n of

th e location , desig n construction , an d operatio n of building , structure , facility , o r installatio n Descriptio n o

f th e nature an

d amount s of

emission s to b e emitte d Descriptio n of

th e ai r qualit y dataan d dispersio n o r

other ai r qualit y modeling used Sufficien t informatio n t o ensur

e attainmen

t an d maintenanc e o

f NAAQ S 40CFR51.166(m ) 40CFR51.166(o)(l ) 40CFR51.166(o)(2 ) 4 0 CF R 51.166(I)(4)(iii)(d ) 4 0 CF R 51.160(c)(2 ) 4 0 CF R 51.160(c)(1 ) 4 0 CF R 51.160(f

) 40CFR51.160(c)-(e ) 4 0 CF R 51.161-16 3

4 0 CF Rpart s 5 1 an d 5 2 PS D an d Nonattainmen

tNS RInformatio

n Collectio

n Reques t Page 1 8 Septembe r 8,199 5P.2 4

TABL E A-2 . RESPONDENT DAT A AN D INFORMATIO

N REQUIREMENT S FORPREPARING PAR

T D (NONATTAINMEN

T NSR ) CONSTRUCTIO

N PERMIT S Requirement

s Propose d Regulatio n Reference Documentatio n tha

t LAE R i s bein g applie d 4 0 CF R 51.165(d)(2 ) Documentatio n tha

t al l source s owned o r

operate d b y sam

e 4 0 CF

R 51.165(h)(1 ) perso n ar e i n complianc e Documentatio n tha

t sufficien t emission s reduction s ar e occurrin g to compl

y wit h specific offse

t requirement s and to ensur e RF P Documentatio n tha

t benefit s o f propose d sourc e significantly outweigh th e environmenta l an d socia l cost s imposed a s aresul t

o f it s location , construction , o r modification Descriptio n o

f th e location , desig n construction , an d operatio n o

f building , structure , facility , o r installatio n Descriptio n of

th e natur e an d amount s of

emission s t

o b e emitte d Descriptio n of

th e ai r qualit y dataan d dispersio n o r

othe r ai r qualit y modelin g use d Sufficien t informatio n to ensur

e attainmen

t an d maintenanc e of

NAAQ S 4 0 CF R 51.165(e )
CAA A

4 0 CF R 51.160(c)(2 ) 4 0 CF R 51.160(c)(1 ) 4 0 CF R 51.160(f

) 40CFR51.160(c)-(e ) 4 0 CF R 51.16 1 4 0 CF R 51.16 2 4 0 CF R 51.16 3

4 0 CF Rpart s 5 1 an d 5 2 PS D an d Nonattainmen

tNS RInformatio

n Collectio

n Reques t Page 1 9 Septembe r 8,199 5P.2 5

TABLE A-3 . STATE DAT A AN D INFORMATIO

N REQUIREMENT S Requirement Propose d Regulatio n Referenc e Earl y FLM notificatio n an

d opportunit

y t o participate i n meeting s Submission of

al l permi t application s to EP

A Submissio n of

notic e of application , preliminar

y determination , degre e of incremen t consumption , an

d opportunit

y fo r publi c commen t Submissio n t o FL M o f

permi t application s 40CFR51.166(p)(l)(ii ) 40CFR51.166(q)(l ) 4 0 CF R 51.166(q)(2)(iv ) 40CFR51.166(p)(l ) Submission of

written reques t

to exempt source s fro

mrevie w Written reques t

fo r us e of innovativ e contro l technology Establishin g an

d operatin g apermittin g progra mfo r al l ne w source s Provid e notic e to EP

A of al l permit s Provid e fo r publi c commen

t fo r al l NS R permit s 4 0 CF R 52.21(I)(4)(vi ) 40CFR51.166(s ) 4 0 CF R 51.16 0 4 0 CF R 51.161(d ) 4 0 CF R 51.16 1

4 0 CF Rpart s 5 1 an d 5 2 PS D an d Nonattainmen

tNS RInformatio

n Collectio

n Reques tSeptembe

r 8,199 5 Page 2 0P.2 6

SEC
. 503
. PERMIT APPLICATIONS
. "(a ) APPLICABL

E DATE.-An

y sourc e specifie

d i n section 502(a

) shal l becom e subjec t t o a permi t program , an

d require d t o have apermit , on th e late r o f th e followin

g dates

- "(1 ) th e effectiv

e dat e o f apermi t progra mor partia l o r interi mpermi t progra m applicable t o th e source ; o r "(2 ) th e date suc

h sourc e become s subjec

t t o sectio n 502(a)
. "(b ) COMPLIANC

E PLAN.-(l ) Th

e regulation s require d b

y sectio n 502(b ) shal

l includ e a requiremen

t tha t th e applican

t submi t wit h th e permi

t application acomplianc e pla n describing ho w th e sourc e wil

l compl y wit h al l applicabl e requirement s unde

r thi s Act
. Th e complianc e pla n shal l includ e aschedule o f

compliance , an

d aschedule unde

r whic h th e permitte e wil

l submi t progres s report s t o th e permitting authorit y n o les s frequently tha

n ever y 6 months
. "(2 ) The regulation s shal

l furthe r requir e th e permitte e t o periodicall y (but n o les s frequently tha n annually ) certif

y tha t th e facilit y i s i n complianc e wit

h an y applicable requirement s o f th e permit , an d t o promptl

y repor t an y deviation s frompermi

t requirement s t o th e permittin g authority
. "(c ) DEADLINE.-An

y perso n required t o have apermi t shall , no t late r tha n 1 2 month s afte

r th e dat e on whic h th e sourc e become s subjec t t o apermi

t progra mapprove d or

promulgate d unde r thi s title , or

suc h earlie r dat e a s th e permitting authorit

y ma y establish , submi

t t o th e permitting authorit

y acomplianc e pla

n an d a n application fo

r apermi t signe d b y aresponsibl e official , who shal

l certif y th e accuracy of

th e informatio

n submitted
. Th e permitting authorit y shal l approv e or disapprov e acompleted application (consisten t wit h th e procedure s established unde r thi s titl e fo r consideratio n o f

suc h applications) , an

d shal l issu e o r den y th e permit , withi

n 1 8 month s afte

r th e dat e o f receip t thereof , except tha t th e permitting authorit

y shal l establis h a phased schedule fo

r acting on permi

t application s submitte

d withi n th e first ful l yea r afte r th e effectiv e dat e o f apermi t progra m(o r apartia l or interi mprogram)
. An

y suc h schedule shal

l assur e tha t a t leas t one-thir d of suc h permit s wil

l b e acte d on b

y suc h authorit y annuall y ove r a perio d o f no t t o excee d 3 year s afte

r suc h effectiv e date
. Suc

h authorit y shal l establis h reasonabl e procedure s t o prioritiz e suc h approva l o r disapprova

l action s i n th e cas e o f

application s fo

r constructio n or

modificatio

n unde r th e applicabl

e requirement s o f

thi s Act
. "(d) TIMEL

Y AN D COMPLET

E APPLICATIONS.-Except fo r source s require d t o hav e a permi t befor e constructio n o r

modificatio

n unde r th e applicable requirement s o f thi s Act , if

a n applican t ha s submitted atimel

y an d complet e application fo

r apermi t require d b y thi s titl e (includin g renewals) , but

final actio n ha s not

bee n taken o n suc

h application , th e source' s failur e t o hav e apermi

t shal l no t b e aviolatio n of

thi s Act , unles s th e dela

y i n fina l actio n wa s du e t o th e failur e o f th e applican

t timel y t o submi t informatio n require d o r

requeste d t o proces s th e application
. N o sourc e require d t o have apermi t unde r thi s titl e shal

l b e i n violatio n o f

sectio n 502(a ) befor e th e dat e on whic h th e sourc e i s required t o submi t a n application unde

r subsectio n (c) . "(e ) COPIES ; AVAILABILITY.- A cop y o f eac h permi t application , complianc e pla n (includin g th e schedule o f

compliance) , emission s or

complianc e monitoring report , certification , an d eac h permi t issued unde

r thi s title , shal

l b e availabl

e t o th e public
. I f

a n applican t o r permitte e i s require d t o submi

t informatio n entitled t o protectio n fromdisclosur e unde r sectio n 114(c ) of thi s Act , th e applican

t or permitte e ma

y submi t suc h informatio

n separately
. The requirement s o f

4 0 CF Rpart s 5 1 an d 5 2 PS D an d Nonattainmen

tNS RInformatio

n Collection Reques

tSeptembe

r 8,199 5 Pag e 2 1P.2 7

section 114(c ) shal

l appl y t o suc h information
. Th

e content s of

apermi t shal l no t b e entitled t o protectio n unde

r section 114(c)
. "SEC
. 504
. PERMIT REQUIREMENT S AN D CONDITIONS
. "(a ) CONDITIONS.-Each permi t issue d unde r thi s titl e shal

l includ e enforceable emissio

n limitation s an

d standards , aschedule o f

compliance , arequiremen

t tha t th e permitte e submi

t t o th e permitting authority , no les s ofte n tha n ever y 6 months , th e result s o f

an y require d monitoring , an d suc h othe r condition s a s ar

e necessar y t o assur e complianc e wit

h applicable requirement s o f thi s Act , includin

g th e requirement s o f

th e applicabl

e implementation plan
. "(b ) MONITORIN G AN

D ANALYSIS.-Th

e Administrato

r ma y by rul e prescrib e procedure s an d method s fo

r determinin

g complianc e an

d fo r monitoring an

d analysi s o f

pollutant s regulate d unde r thi s Act , but

continuou s emission s monitoring nee d no t b e require d i

f alternativ e method s ar e availabl e tha t provid e sufficientl

y reliable an

d timel y informatio

n fo r determining compliance
. Nothin g i n thi s subsection shal

l b e construe d t o affec

t an y continuou s emission s monitoring requiremen

t o f titl e IV , o r

wher e required elsewher

e i n thi s Act
. "(c ) INSPECTION , ENTRY , MONITORING , CERTIFICATION , AN D REPORTING.-Each permi

t issue d unde r thi s titl e shal

l se t fort h inspection , entry , monitoring , complianc e certification , an d reportin g requirement s t o assur e complianc e wit

h th e permi

t term s an d conditions
. Suc

h monitoring an

d reportin g requirement s shal l confor mt o an y applicable regulatio n unde

r subsectio n (b)
. An

y repor t required t o b e submitte

d b y apermi t issued t o a corporatio n unde

r thi s titl e shal

l b e signe d b y aresponsibl e corporate official , wh o shal l certif y it s accuracy .

4 0 CF Rpart s 5 1 an d 5 2 PS D an d Nonattainmen tNS RInformatio n Collectio n Reques tSeptembe r 8,199 5 Pag e 2 2P.2 8

40CFR 70.5(c) Standard applications

form and required information. The Stat

e progra m unde r thi s par t shal l provid e fo r astandar d application for

mor forms
. Information a s described belo w fo r eac h emission s uni

t a t apar t 7 0 sourc e shal

l b e include

d i n th e application
. Th e Administrato

r ma y approv e a s par

t of aStat e progra malis t o f insignifican

t activitie s an

d emission s level s whic

h nee d no t b e include d i n permi t applications
. However , fo

r insignifican

t activitie s which ar

e exempted becaus e of

size o r productio n rate , alis t

o f suc h insignifican

t activitie s mus t

b e included i

n th e application
. A

n application ma

y no t omi t informatio n needed t o determine th e applicabilit

y of , o r t o impose , an

y applicable requirement , o r t o evaluat e th e fe e amoun t require d unde

r th e schedule approved pursuan t t o §70. 9 o f

thi s part . The permittin g authorit y ma y us e discretio n i

n developin

g application forms tha

t bes t mee t progra mneed s an

d administrativ e efficiency
. The forms an d attachment s chosen , however , shal l includ e th e element s specifie d below : (1 ) Identifyin

g information , includin

g compan y nam e an d addres s (o r

plan t nam e an d addres s if differen t fromth e compan

y name) , owner' s nam

e an d agent , an

d telephone numbe

r an d name s o f plan t sit e manager/contact
. (2 ) A descriptio n o f

th e source' s processe s an

d product s (b

y Standar d Industria l Classificatio

n Code ) includin

g an y associated alternativ e scenari o identifie d b y th e source . (3 ) The followin

g emissio n relate d information : (I ) Al l emission s of

pollutant s fo

r whic h th e sourc e i s major

, an d al l emission s o f

regulate d ai r pollutants
. A permi

t application shal

l describ e al

l emission s of

regulate d ai

r pollutant s emitted froman y emission s unit , except

wher e suc h unit s ar e exempte d unde r thi s paragraph (c ) o f

thi s section
. The permitting authorit y shal l requir e additiona l informatio

n relate d t o th e emission s o f ai r pollutant s sufficien

t t o verif y whic h requirement s ar

e applicable t o th e source , an d othe r informatio n necessar y t o collect

an y permi t fee s owe d unde r th e fe e schedule approve d pursuan t t o §70.9(b ) o f

thi s part . (ii ) Identification an

d descriptio n of

al l point s of emission s described i

n paragraph (c)(3)(I ) o f thi s sectio n i

n sufficien t detail t o establish th e basi s fo r fee s an d applicabilit

y o f requirement s o f th e Act
. (iii ) Emission s rat e i

n tp y an d i n suc h term s a s ar

e necessar y t o establis h complianc e consisten t wit h th e applicable standar

d referenc e tes t

method
. (iv ) The followin

g informatio

n t o th e exten

t i t i s neede d t o determine t o regulat

e emissions : Fuels , fue l use , ra w materials , productio n rates , an d operatin g schedules
. (v ) Identification an

d descriptio n o f

ai r pollutio n contro l equipmen t an d complianc e monitoring device s o r

activities
. (vi ) Limitation s o n sourc e operatio n affectin g emission s or

an y wor k practic e standards , wher e applicable , fo

r al l regulate d pollutant s a

t th e par t 7 0 source . (vii ) Othe r informatio n require d b

y an y applicable requiremen

t (including informatio

n relate d t o stack heigh t limitation s developed pursuan t t o section 123 o f

th e Act. ) (viii ) Calculation s on whic

h th e informatio

n on paragraph s (c)(3)(I ) throug h (c)(3)(vii ) of thi s sectio n i s based
. (4 ) The followin

g ai r pollutio n contro l requirements : (I ) Citatio n an

d descriptio n o f

al l applicable requirements , an d (ii ) Descriptio n o f

o r referenc e t o an

y applicable tes t

metho d fo r determining complianc e wit h eac h applicable requirement
.

4 0 CF Rpart s 5 1 an d 5 2 PS D an d Nonattainmen tNS RInformatio n Collectio n Reques tSeptembe r 8,199 5 Pag e 2 3P.2 9

(5 ) Othe r specifi c informatio

n tha t ma y b e necessar

y t o implemen

t an d enforc e othe

r applicable requirement s o f

th e Ac t o r o f thi s par t o r t o determin

e th e applicabilit

y o f suc h requirements
. (6 ) A n explanation o f

an y propose d exemption s fromotherwis e applicable requirements
. (7 ) Additiona

l informatio

n a s determined t o b e necessar y b y th e permitting authorit

y t o defin e alternativ e operatin g scenario s identifie d b y th e sourc e pursuan

t t o § 70.6(a)(9 ) o f

thi s par t o r t o defin e permi t term s an d condition s implementin

g § 70.4(b)(12 ) o r

§ 70.6(a)(10 ) o f

thi s part . (8 ) A complianc e plan , fo

r al l par t 7 0 source s tha

t contain s al

l th e following : (I ) A descriptio n o f

th e complianc e statu s of

th e sourc e wit

h respec t t o al l applicable requirements
. (ii ) A descriptio n a s follows : (A ) Fo r applicable requirement s wit h whic h th e sourc e i s i

n compliance , astatemen

t tha t th e sourc e wil l continu e t o compl

y wit h suc h requirements
. (B ) Fo r applicable requirement s tha t wil l becom e effectiv e during th e permi

t term , a statemen t tha t th e sourc e wil

l mee t suc h requirement s on atimel

y basis
. (c ) Fo r requirement s fo

r whic h th e sourc e i s no t

i n complianc e a

t th e tim e o r permi t issuance , anarrativ e descriptio n o f

ho w th e sourc e wil

l achieve complianc e wit

h suc h requirements , (iii ) A complianc e schedule a s follows : (A ) Fo r applicable requirement s wit h whic h th e sourc e i s i

n compliance , astatemen

t tha t th e sourc e wil l continu e t o compl

y wit h suc h requirements
. (B ) Fo r applicable requirement s tha t wil l becom e effectiv e during th e permi

t term , a statemen t tha t th e sourc e wil

l mee t suc h requirement s on atimel

y basis
. A statemen

t tha t th e sourc e wil l mee t i n atimel y manne r applicable requirement s tha t becom e effectiv e during th e permi t ter mshal l satisf y thi s provision , unles s amor e detailed schedule i s expressl y require d b

y th e applicable requirement
. (c ) A schedule o f

complianc e fo

r source s tha

t ar e no t i n complianc e wit

h al l applicable requirement s a

t th e tim e o f permi t issuance
. Suc

h aschedule shal

l includ e aschedule o f

remedia l measures , includin

g a n enforceable sequenc e o f

action s wit

h milestones , leading t o complianc e wit h an y applicable requirement s fo r whic h th e sourc e wil

l b e i n noncomplianc e a

t th e tim e of permi t issuance
. Thi s complianc e schedul e shal l resembl e an d b e a t leas t a s stringen

t a s tha t contained i

n an y judicia l consen t decre e o r administrative orde

r t o whic h th e sourc e i s subject
. An y such schedul e o f

complianc e shal

l b e supplementa

l t o an d shal l no t sanctio n noncomplianc e with , th e applicable requirement s o n whic h i t i s based
. (iv ) A schedule fo

r submissio n o f certifie d progres s report s n o les s frequently tha n ever y 6 month s fo r source s require d t o hav e aschedule o f complianc e t o remed

y aviolation
. (v ) Th e complianc e pla

n conten t requirement s specifie

d i n thi s paragrap h shal

l appl y an d b e include d i n th e acid rai

n portio n of

acomplianc e pla

n fo r a n affecte d source , excep t

a s specificall

y superseded b

y regulation s promulgated unde r titl e IV o f th e Ac t wit h regar d t o th e schedule an

d method(s ) th e sourc e wil

l us e t o achieve complianc e wit h th e aci d rai n emission s limitations
. (9 ) Requirement s fo

r complianc e certification , includin g th e following : (I ) A certification o f

complianc e wit

h al l applicable requirement s b

y aresponsibl e officia

l consisten t wit h paragraph (d ) of

thi s section an

d section 114(a)(3 ) o f

th e Act ; (ii ) A statemen

t o f method s use d fo

r determinin

g compliance , including adescriptio n o f monitoring , recor

d keeping , an

d reportin g requirement s an d tes t methods ;

4 0 CF Rpart s 5 1 an d 5 2 PS D an d Nonattainmen

tNS RInformatio

n Collection Reques

tSeptembe

r 8,199 5 Pag e 2 4P.3 0

(iii ) A schedule fo

r submissio n of complianc e certification s during th e permi t term , t o b e submitted n o les s frequently tha n annually , o r

mor e frequently i

f specifie d b y th e underlyin

g applicable requiremen

t or b y th e permitting authority ; an d (iv ) A statemen

t indicatin g th e source' s complianc e statu s wit h an y applicable enhance

d monitoring an

d complianc e certification requirement s o f th e Act
. (10 ) The us e o f

nationally-standardized forms fo r aci d rai n portion s o f

permi t application s an d complianc e plans , a s require d b y regulation s promulgated unde r titl e I V o f th e Act
. (d ) An y application form, report , or complianc e certification submitted pursuan t t o thes e regulation s shal

l contain certification b

y aresponsible officia

l of truth , accuracy , an

d completeness
. Thi s certification an d an y othe r certification require d unde

r thi s par t shal l state that , base d o n information an d belief forme d afte r reasonabl e inquiry , th e statement s an d informatio n i n th e documen

t ar e true , accurate , an

d complete
.

4 0 CF Rpart s 5 1 an d 5 2 PS D an d Nonattainmen

tNS RInformatio

n Collection Reques

tSeptembe

r 8,199 5 Page 2 5