alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 56133.

protests 156747-K, etc. (New York).

#### Anglo Persian Mercantile Co. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
STEAM ELECTRIC

C B I R E P L AC E M E NT P A G E

EPA

- HQ

- OW

- 20 09

- 0819

DCN:

________________________________________

T H E FO LL OW ING H AS BEE N R E M O V E D BE CAUSE IT
C O N T AINS C O N F ID E N T IAL B USIN E SS IN FO RMA T I O N (C B I) P E R 4 0 C F R P ART 2
, SU B P ART B

. SE04360A170
III 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 601 

Recognizing the efforts and contributions of outstanding Hispanic scientists 

in the United States. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 30 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 29), 2006 

Mr. MARTINEZ (for himself, Mr. SALAZAR, Mr. MENENDEZ, and Mr. NELSON

of Florida) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

NOVEMBER 16, 2006 

Committee discharged; considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the efforts and contributions of outstanding 

Hispanic scientists in the United States. 

Whereas the purpose of the National Hispanic Scientist of 

the Year Award is to recognize outstanding Hispanic scientists in the United States who promote a greater public 

understanding of science and motivate Hispanic youth to 

develop an interest in science; 

Whereas the sixth annual National Hispanic Scientist of the 

Year Gala will be held at the Museum of Science & Industry in Tampa, Florida, on Saturday, October 28, 

2006; 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
2 

SRES 601 ATS 

Whereas proceeds of the National Hispanic Scientist of the 

Year Gala support scholarships for Hispanic boys and 

girls to participate in the Museum of Science & Industry’s Youth Enriched by Science Program, known as the 

‘‘YES! Team’’; and 

Whereas a need to acknowledge the work and effort of outstanding Hispanic scientists in the United States has led 

to the selection of Dr. Ine ́s Cifuentes as the honoree of 

the sixth annual National Hispanic Scientist of the Year 

Award, in recognition of her dedication to training 

science and mathematics educators, and her involvement 

in encouraging young students to study the earth 

sciences: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) recognizes efforts to educate, support, and 

3 provide hope for the Hispanic community, including 

4 efforts to honor outstanding Hispanic scientists in 

5 the United States at the annual National Hispanic 

6 Scientist of the Year Gala and to organize a ‘‘Meet 

7 the Hispanic Scientist Day’’; and 

8 (2) congratulates Dr. Ine ́s Cifuentes for being 

9 honored as the National Hispanic Scientist of the 

10 Year for 2006 by the Museum of Science & Indus11 try, in recognition of the dedication Dr. Cifuentes 

12 has shown to training science and mathematics edu13 cators and her involvement in encouraging young 

14 students to study the earth sciences. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: November 5, 2010 | /s/ WILLIAM L. JASPER            |   |
|-----------------------------|---------------------------------------|--------|
|                        | William L. Jasper                     |   |
|                        | President and Chief Executive Officer |   |
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Union Tank Car Company (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kenneth
P. Fischl, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, do hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

     In witness whereof, I have executed this certification as of the 14th day
of May, 2003.

                                                 /s/ Kenneth P. Fischl
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                     Kenneth P. Fischl
                                                     Principal Executive Officer
#### Franklin Bank *versus*Lawrence *& al.*

An action upon a negotiated note pannot be brought in the name of a person haying no interest in it, except by his consent.

Assumpsit upon a negotiable note against the makers. It was indorsed to the bank by the payees, who had subsequently settled it with the bank by their draft on W. & H. Stevens.

There was no proof that the bank had authorized or assented to the bringing of this suit. A nonsuit was directed, which is to be stricken off if improperly ordered.

*Danforth*and *Woods,*for the plaintiffs.

By the production of the note, the plaintiffs are to be considered rightfully in court.

The bank has an interest in the note. The draft was not necessarily a payment. The presumption is, that the bank is still the holder, and prosecuting for those concerned, the money when collected to be applied to the draft, or otherwise for their benefit.

The suit is maintainable without any interest in the bank. *Beekman*v. *Wilson,*9 Mete. *436; Southard*v. *Wilson, 29*Maine, 56; *Yancleef*v. *Therasson,*3 Pick. 12; *Watkins*v. *Hill,*8 Pick. 522; *Brigham*v. *Marean, 7*Pick. 42; *Rogers*v. *Bnrkee,*10 Johns. *400; Harriman*v. *Hill,*14 Maine, 127.

It is not necessary to prove the consent of the bank. *Thornton*v. *Moody al.*11 Maine, 253 ; *Fairfield*v. *Adams,*16 Pick. 381.

Even if the note had been paid, its negotiability would not have been destroyed, and there is nothing in the case to rebut the presumption, that it has a second time been transferred to the bank. *Guild*v. *Eager,*17 Mass. 615; *Eaton*v. *Carey,*10 Pick. 211.

If the action should be maintained, the defendants have no reason to complain, as there is no pretence that *they*have paid the note, or will suffer any damage.

*587*North,*for the defendants.

Wells, J.,

orally.—The plaintiffs have no interest in the, note, nor have they consented that the suit should be brought in their name. It cannot, therefore, be sustained. The property in the note became the indorsers’, as soon as they had settled it at the bank. With the consent of the bank, it might have been sued in the present *form;*but not without that consent. *Bradford*v. *Buckman,*3 Fairf. 15. Otherwise a party might be made a litigant, and subjected to cost, without any interest in the subject, or even any notice of it.

*Nonsuit confirmed.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                   5
<LEGEND>
         ARIS INDUSTRIES INC.
     Article 5 of Regulation S-X
</LEGEND>

<MULTIPLIER>                1
       
<S>                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            FEB-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                 AUG-03-1996
<CASH>                                           810,000
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 11,496,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                   39,392,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1,774,000
<PP&E>                                        31,267,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                17,886,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                91,092,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         27,204,000
<BONDS>                                       68,848,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                         119,000
<OTHER-SE>                                    (5,079,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  91,092,000
<SALES>                                       69,133,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              69,133,000
<CGS>                                         56,527,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 56,527,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              13,911,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             4,455,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (5,760,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (145,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (5,615,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (5,615,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      (0.47)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      (0.47)
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.14


 


AMENDMENT NUMBER 1


 


TO


 


 


 


ACTELIS NETWORKS, INC.


 


2015 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 





 



 


AMENDED: NOVEMBER 4, 2015


 


 



 






     


     


    

 


The following amendments to 2015 Equity Incentive
Plan (the “Plan”) of Actelis Networks, Inc. (the “Company”) were duly adopted by the Board of Directors
of the Company in its meeting held on November 4, 2015, in accordance with the powers and authorities granted to the Administrator under
Section 4(b) of the Plan.


 


Capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein
shall have the meaning ascribed to them in the Plan.


 


		1.	A new Section 13(d) will be added to the Plan, right after Section 13(c), and read as follows:



 


“13(d) Notwithstanding the provisions
of Section 13(c) above, in the event of a Change in Control, the vesting schedule of options granted to the Company’s (or any
of its Affiliated Companies’) Employees shall accelerate as follows:


 


		(i)	In respect of Employees who are employed for more than ten (10) years by the Company or any Affiliated
Company thereof on the date of closing of the Change in Control — (a) 50% of their Awards shall accelerate upon the closing of the
Change in Control transaction; and (b) the remaining 50% of their Awards (and 100% in total) shall accelerate if: (1) their employment
is terminated within two years from the closing of the Change in Control; or (2) if they remain employees of the Company, an Affiliated
Company and/or any successor thereof for at least two years following the date of closing of the Change in Control;



 


		(ii)	In respect of Employees who are employed for more than five (5) years but less than ten (10) years by
the Company or any Affiliated Company thereof on the date of closing of the Change in Control — (a) 25% of their Awards shall accelerate
upon the closing of the Change in Control transaction; and (b) the remaining 75% of their Awards (and 100% in total) shall accelerate
if: (1) their employment is terminated within two years from the closing of the Change in Control; or (2) if they remain employees of
the Company, an Affiliated Company and/or any successor thereof for at least two years following the date of closing of the Change in
Control; and



 


		(iii)	In respect of Employees who are employed for less than five (5) years by the Company or any Affiliated
Company thereof on the date of closing of the Change in Control — (a) no acceleration upon the closing of the Change in Control
transaction; and (b) 100% of their Awards shall accelerate if: (1) their employment is terminated within two years from the closing of
the Change in Control; or (2) if they remain employees of the Company, an Affiliated Company and/or any successor thereof for at least
two years following the date of closing of the Change in Control.



 


*          *          *
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-40817

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

HERIBERTO MOYA-MENA

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:07-CR-478-ALL

Before REAVLEY, BENAVIDES, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgmentin a Criminal Case, Heriberto Moya-Mena raises

arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S.

224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and

not a separate criminal offense. UnitedStates v.Pineda-Arrellano, 492F.3d 624,

625 (5th Cir. 2007), cert. denied, 2008 WL 59441 (Jan. 7, 2008) (No. 07-6202).

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

January 30, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 07-40817

2

The appellant’s motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment

of the district court is AFFIRMED.
No. 43085.

#### Protest 958205-G of James Loudon & Co. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Dallingeb, J.

The plaintiffs having failed to sustain the burden of proving that their claim was correct, the protest was overruled.
```

                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly  Report of NYFIX,  Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the period ending  September 30, 2002 as filed with the  Securities and
Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Mark R. Hahn,  Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, to
the best of my knowledge, that:

    (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section  13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 /s/ Mark R. Hahn
-----------------------
Mark R. Hahn
Chief Financial Officer
November 13, 2002

This  certification  accompanies  this  Report  pursuant  to Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and  shall not be deemed  filed by the  Company  for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondent
v. KEVIN J. SHERLOCK, Petitioner : : : : : : : : : : : No. 797 MAL 2014 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondent
v. KEVIN J. SHERLOCK, Petitioner : : : : : : : : : : : No. 798 MAL 2014 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER
PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 24th day of February, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED

.
# C_2017202EN.01000402.xml

| 26.6.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.6.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/4

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 27 April 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation — France) — A-Rosa Flussschiff GmbH v Union de recouvrement des cotisations de sécurité sociale et d’allocations familiales (Urssaf) d’Alsace, successor in law to the Urssaf du Bas-Rhin, and Sozialversicherungsanstalt des Kantons Graubünden

(Case C-620/15) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Migrant workers - Social security - Legislation applicable - Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 - Article 14(2)(a) - Regulation (EEC) No 574/72 - Article 12a(1a) - Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation - Travelling personnel - Workers posted to another Member State - Swiss branch - E 101 certificate - Probative value))

(2017/C 202/06)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Referring court

Cour de cassation

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: A-Rosa Flussschiff GmbH

Applicant:

Defendants: Union de recouvrement des cotisations de sécurité sociale et d’allocations familiales (Urssaf) d’Alsace, successor in law to the Urssaf du Bas-Rhin, and Sozialversicherungsanstalt des Kantons Graubünden

Defendants:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 12a(1a) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 574/72 of 21 March 1972 fixing the procedure for implementing Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 of the Council of 14 June 1971 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons, to self-employed persons and to members of their families moving within the Community, as amended and updated by Council Regulation (EC) No 118/97 of 2 December 1996, as amended by Regulation (EC) No 647/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 April 2005, must be interpreted as meaning that an E 101 certificate issued by the institution designated by the competent authority of a Member State pursuant to Article 14(2)(a) of Regulation No 1408/71, as amended and updated by Regulation No 118/97, as amended by Regulation (EC) No 647/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 April 2005, is binding on both the social security institutions of the Member State in which the work is carried out and the courts of that Member State, even where it is found by those courts that the conditions under which the worker concerned carries out his activities clearly do not fall within the material scope of that provision of Regulation No 1408/71.

---

(1)  OJ C 48, 8.2.2016.

1

---
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 95-11226

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ABEL MALDONADO,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:95-CR-116-R

- - - - - - - - - -

November 26, 1996

Before JONES, DeMOSS and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Abel Maldonado appeals his guilty-plea conviction and

sentence for trafficking in stolen motor vehicles and motor

vehicle parts with altered vehicle identification numbers, in

violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2321. He argues that the district court

erred in calculating his criminal history score and in

calculating the amount of loss attributable to the scheme.
No. 95-11226

- 2 -

The district court did not err in awarding a two-level

increase in Maldonado’s criminal history score for being under a

criminal justice sentence at the time he committed the instant

offense. See U.S.S.G. § 4A1.2(l). The district court did not

err in determining that the amount of loss exceeded $70,000. See

United States v. Wimbish, 980 F.2d 312, 313 (5th Cir. 1992),

cert. denied, 508 U.S. 919 (1993); U.S.S.G. § 2F1.1, comment.

(n.8).

AFFIRMED.
# L_2007164EN.01S00301.xml

| 26.6.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 164/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.6.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 164/s3

---

NOTICE TO READERS

In view of the situation which has arisen following enlargement, some editions of the Official Journal of 27, 29 and 30 December 2006 have been published, in a simplified manner, in the official languages of that date.

It has been decided to republish, as corrigenda and in the Official Journal’s traditional presentation, Acts which appear in those Official Journals.

It is for this reason that Official Journals which contain only those corrigenda have been published in the pre-enlargement language versions. The translations of Acts in the languages of the new Member States will be published in a special edition of the Official Journal of the European Union comprising texts of the institutions and the European Central Bank adopted prior to 1 January 2007.

Official Journal of the European Union

Given below is a list of the Official Journals published on 27, 29 and 30 December 2006 and their corresponding corrigenda.

| OJ of 27 December 2006 | Corrected OJ (2007) |
| --- | --- |
| L 370 | L 30 |
| L 371 | L 45 |
| L 373 | L 121 |
| L 375 | L 70 |

OJ of 27 December 2006

Corrected OJ (2007)

L 370

L 30

L 371

L 45

L 373

L 121

L 375

L 70

| OJ of 29 December 2006 | Corrected OJ (2007) |
| --- | --- |
| L 387 | L 34 |

OJ of 29 December 2006

Corrected OJ (2007)

L 387

L 34

| OJ of 30 December 2006 | Corrected OJ (2007) |
| --- | --- |
| L 396 | L 136 |
| L 400 | L 54 |
| L 405 | L 29 |
| L 407 | L 44 |
| L 408 | L 47 |
| L 409 | L 36 |
| L 410 | L 40 |
| L 411 | L 27 |
| L 413 | L 50 |

OJ of 30 December 2006

Corrected OJ (2007)

L 396

L 136

L 400

L 54

L 405

L 29

L 407

L 44

L 408

L 47

L 409

L 36

L 410

L 40

L 411

L 27

L 413

L 50

---
# Official Journal L 333/2021

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 333 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6421 September 2021 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 333

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6421 September 2021

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/1689 of 17 September 2021 concerning the extension of the action taken by the Bulgarian Ministry of Health permitting the making available on the market and use of the biocidal products Ecolab P3-Topax 66/Еколаб P3-Tопакс 66 and Ecolab BACFORCE EL 900/Еколаб БАКФОРС EL 900 in accordance with Article 55(1) of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council
  (notified under document C(2021)6693) | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

DECISIONS

*

Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/1689 of 17 September 2021 concerning the extension of the action taken by the Bulgarian Ministry of Health permitting the making available on the market and use of the biocidal products Ecolab P3-Topax 66/Еколаб P3-Tопакс 66 and Ecolab BACFORCE EL 900/Еколаб БАКФОРС EL 900 in accordance with Article 55(1) of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council
  (notified under document C(2021)6693)

(notified under document C(2021)6693)

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.