alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| (logo) WELLS  FARGO | **Commercial  Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084,  8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|---------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 **ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

** **

 

Reference is hereby made to that certain Trust and Servicing Agreementdated as of February 1, 2016, by and among Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc., asDepositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Servicer and SpecialServicer, Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee, and Wells FargoBank, National Association, as Certificate Administrator, with respect toCommercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2016-PSQ (the"Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise definedshall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 10.8 of the Agreement, I, Leslie Hayton,Managing Director of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1.      A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period fromJanuary 1, 2018 through December 31, 2018 (the “Reporting Period”) , and of itsperformance per the Agreement during such period has been made under mysupervision, and

 

2.      To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer,has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all materialrespects throughout the Reporting Period. 

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2019.

 

 

/s/Leslie Hayton

LeslieHayton

ManagingDirector

WellsFargo Bank

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank,  N.A. | (logo) Together  we’ll go far |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
No. 47577.

#### Protest 36754-K/89444 of Wah Ching Lung Co. (Chicago).

Opinion by

Cline; J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise in question is similar to some' of the articles covered by the decision of *Oy Wo Tong*v. *United States*(5 Cust. Ct. 70, C. D. 372). In accordance therewith the claim for free entry under paragraph 1669 was sustained as to some of the drugs, but the protest was held not sufficient to support the claim under paragraph 34. The"protest was therefore overruled in all other respects.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION

In The Matter Of: PAZ AVIATION, INC. Respondent. Docket No. FAA-2014-0807 Judge J.E. Sullivan
FAA Case No. 2011 S0190272

FAA'S WITHDRAWAL OF COMPLAINT
Comes now the FAA, pursuant to 14 C.P.R. § 13.215 and inview ofa settlement reached between the FAA and the Respondent, the FAA hereby withdraws its Complaint in the abovereferenced matter. There will, therefore, be no issues for litigation in the hearing currently scheduled for March 14-16, 2017. Wherefore, the FAA hereby moves the administrative law judge to dismiss the proceedings. Respectfully submitted



# this~ day ofApril, 2016.

BRANDON C. GOLDBERG Attorney Office ofthe ChiefCounsel Enforcement Division Southern TeamCERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certifythat a copy ofthe FAA's Withdrawal ofComplaintwas mailed this date via certified mail, return receipt requested, to: Hearing Docket Clerk FAA, AGC-430, Suite 2W1000 Wilbur Wright Building 800 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20591 David M. McDonald, Esq., Counsel forRespondent McDonald & McDonald Attorneys at Law 5600 NW 36 Street Suite 100 Miami, Florida 33166 Hon. J.E. Sullivan,AdministrativeLawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) Washington, DC 20590

Dated (original+ 1 copy)
Exhibit 12.1

United Air Lines, Inc. and SubsidiaryCompanies
Computation of Ratio of Earningsto Fixed Charges    Nine Months Ended September 30    20022001 (In Millions)Earnings(loss):    Loss before income taxes, extraordinary item     and cumulative effect of accounting change$   (2,117)$  (2,830)  Fixed charges, from below597 673   Undistributed (earnings) losses of affiliates- (3)  Interest capitalized     (22)    (63)         Earnings (loss)$ (1,542)$ (2,223) ===== =====    Fixed charges:       Interest expense$   453 $   394   Portion of rental expense representative        of the interest factor    144    279         Fixed charges$   597 $   673  ===== =====    Ratio ofearnings to fixed charges      (a)           (a) ===== =====       
______
(a)  Earnings were inadequateto cover fixed charges by $2.1 billion in 2002 and $2.9 billion in 2001.
**Certifications**

I, Richard Simpson, certifythat:

 

1.            I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D requiredto be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K ofCitigroup Commercial Mortgage Trust 2016-GC36 (the Exchange Act periodicreports);

 

2.            Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, donot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.            Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other informationrequired to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this reportis included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4.            Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required in thisreport under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in theExchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligationsunder the servicing agreements in all material respects; and

 

5.            All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria forasset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment ofcompliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to beincluded in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB andExchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to thisreport, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any materialinstances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed inthis report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certificationsabove, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the followingunaffiliated parties: KeyBank National Association; Wells Fargo Bank, NationalAssociation; Computershare Trust Company, National Association; GreystoneServicing Company LLC; Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, NationalAssociation; Pentalpha Surveillance LLC; Berkadia Commercial Mortgage LLC;Wilmington Trust, National Association; Situs Holdings, LLC; Park Bridge LenderServices LLC; CoreLogic Solutions, LLC; and Berkeley Point Capital LLC. 

 

Date:       March 29, 2022

 

/s/ Richard SimpsonRichard SimpsonPresident, Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc.(senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-16-00260-CR

Nathan Timothy Farias

v.

The State of Texas

On Appeal from the

430th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas

Trial Cause No. CR-4870-14-J

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

June 21, 2018
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-7139

EDWARD F. ARRINGTON, Petitioner - Appellant, versus SID HARKLEROAD, Superintendent, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Graham C. Mullen, Chief District Judge. (CA-02-170-1) Submitted: February 15, 2006 Decided: March 23, 2006 Before NIEMEYER and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Edward F. Arrington, Appellant Pro Se. Sandra Wallace-Smith, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Edward F. Arrington, a state prisoner, seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. SeeMiller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Arrington has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the a ppeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
# C_2015398EN.01002101.xml

| 30.11.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 398/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.11.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 398/21

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato (Italy) lodged on 28 September 2015 — Aiudapds — Associazione Italiana delle Unità Dedicate Autonome Private di Day Surgery e dei Centri di Chirurgia Ambulatoriale v Agenzia Italiana del Farmaco (AIFA) and Ministero della Salute

(Case C-520/15)

(2015/C 398/26)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Referring court

Consiglio di Stato

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Aiudapds — Associazione Italiana delle Unità Dedicate Autonome Private di Day Surgery e dei Centri di Chirurgia Ambulatoriale

Appellant:

Respondents: Agenzia Italiana del Farmaco (AIFA) and Ministero della Salute

Respondents:

Other parties: Roche SpA, Novartis Farma SpA, and Regione Marche

Other parties:

Question referred

Question referred

Do the second paragraph of Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (2000/C 364/01), in which it is stated that everyone is entitled to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time by an independent and impartial tribunal previously established by law and which guarantees the right to a fair trial, Article 54 of that Charter which prohibits abuse of that right, and Article 6(1) of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, signed in Rome on 4 November 1950, in which it is stated that everyone is entitled to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time by an independent and impartial tribunal established by law, preclude national legislation which, pursuant to Article 10 of Presidential Decree No 1199 of 24 November 1971 and Article 48 of Legislative Decree No 104 of 2 July 2010, enables only one of the parties to extraordinary proceedings brought exclusively before the Consiglio di Stato to have those proceedings transferred at first instance to a Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale without the approval or participation of the appellant or any other party to those proceedings?

---
III 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 384 

Designating March 2, 2006, as ‘‘Read Across America Day’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 28, 2006 

Ms. COLLINS (for herself, Mr. REED, and Mr. LAUTENBERG) submitted the 

following resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating March 2, 2006, as ‘‘Read Across America Day’’. 

Whereas reading is a basic requirement for quality education 

and professional success, and is a source of pleasure 

throughout life; 

Whereas the people of the United States must be able to read 

if the United States is to remain competitive in the global 

economy; 

Whereas Congress, through the No Child Left Behind Act of 

2001 (Public Law 107–110) and the Reading First, 

Early Reading First, and Improving Literacy Through 

School Libraries programs, has placed great emphasis on 

reading intervention and providing additional resources 

for reading assistance; and 

Whereas more than 40 national associations concerned about 

reading and education have joined with the National 


rfake on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 384 ATS

Education Association to use March 2, the anniversary of 

the birth of Theodor Geisel, also known as Dr. Seuss, to 

celebrate reading: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates March 2, 2006, as ‘‘Read Across 

3 America Day’’; 

4 (2) honors Theodor Geisel, also known as Dr. 

5 Seuss, for his success in encouraging children to dis6 cover the joy of reading; 

7 (3) encourages parents to read with their chil8 dren for at least 30 minutes on Read Across Amer9 ica Day in honor of Dr. Seuss and in celebration of 

10 reading; and 

11 (4) encourages the people of the United States 

12 to observe the day with appropriate ceremonies and 

13 activities. 

Æ 


rfake on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
#### L. Bamberger & Co. *v.*United States

No. 7420.

Invoice dated London, England, September 1944.

Certified September 1944.

Entered at Newark, N. J., October 18, 1944.

Entry No. 323.

(Decided October 27, 1947)

*Strauss & Hedges (I-ladley S. King*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Tilson, Judge:

This appeal has been submitted upon a stipulation in which the respective parties have agreed that the issues involved herein are the same in all material respects as those involved in *United States*v. *Pitcairn,*C. A. D. 334, and the record in that case has been admitted in evidence herein.

Accepting this stipulation as a statement of fact, and following the cited authority, I find and hold the proper dutiable export values of the merchandise covered by this appeal to be the values found by the appraiser, less any amount added to cover the so-called British purchase tax. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
```

[House Report 110-338]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

110th Congress                                            Rept. 110-338
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 2d Session                                                      Part 4

======================================================================

 
                 COAST GUARD AUTHORIZATION ACT OF 2007

                                _______
                                

                 April 23, 2008.--Ordered to be printed

                                _______
                                

    Mr. Conyers, from the Committee on the Judiciary, submitted the 
                               following

                          SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT

                        [To accompany H.R. 2830]

                          Advisory on Earmarks

    Amend the language in the Advisory on Earmarks section to 
read as follows:
    The provisions that warranted a referral to the Committee 
on the Judiciary do not contain congressional earmarks, limited 
tax benefits, or limited tariff benefits as defined in clause 
9(d), 9(e), or 9(f) of Rule XXI.

                                  

```
# L_2013247EN.01S00302.xml

| 18.9.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 247/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.9.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 247/s3

---

NOTE TO READERS — WAY OF REFERRING TO ACTS

As of 1 July 2013 the way of referring to acts has changed.

During a transitional period this new practice will coexist with the previous one.

---
**Certifications**

I, Richard Simpson, certifythat:

 

1.            I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D requiredto be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K ofCitigroup Commercial Mortgage Trust 2016-GC36 (the “Exchange Act periodicreports”);

 

2.            Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, donot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.            Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other informationrequired to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this reportis included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4.            Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required in thisreport under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in theExchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligationsunder the servicing agreements in all material respects; and

 

5.            All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria forasset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment ofcompliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to beincluded in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB andExchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to thisreport, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any materialinstances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed inthis report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certificationsabove, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the followingunaffiliated parties: KeyBank National Association; Wells Fargo Bank, NationalAssociation; Computershare Trust Company, National Association; GreystoneServicing Company LLC; Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, NationalAssociation; Pentalpha Surveillance LLC; Berkadia Commercial Mortgage LLC;Wilmington Trust, National Association; Situs Holdings, LLC; Park Bridge LenderServices LLC; CoreLogic Solutions, LLC; and Berkeley Point Capital LLC. 

 

Date:       March 29, 2024

 

/s/ Richard SimpsonRichard SimpsonPresident, Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc.(senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
# C_2016454EN.01001101.xml

| 5.12.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 454/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.12.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 454/11

---

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 14 September 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Judecătoria Satu Mare — Romania) — Pavel Dumitraș, Mioara Dumitraș v BRD Groupe Société Générale — Sucursala Judeţeană Satu Mare

(Case C-534/15) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Consumer protection - Directive 93/13/EEC - Unfair terms - Article 1(1) - Article 2(b) - Status of consumer - Assignment of a debt by novation of loan agreements - Contracts providing immovable property as security entered into by individuals not having any professional relationship with the new debtor company))

(2016/C 454/22)

Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Judecătoria Satu Mare

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Pavel Dumitraș, Mioara Dumitraș

Defendant: BRD Groupe Société Générale — Sucursala Judeţeană Satu Mare

Operative part of the order

Articles 1(1) and 2(b) of Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts must be interpreted as meaning that that directive applies to a contract providing immovable property as security concluded between natural persons and a credit institution in order to guarantee the obligations that a commercial company has undertaken with respect to that credit institution for a credit agreement, where those natural persons have acted for purposes which are outside their trade, business or profession and have no functional links with that company, which is for the referring court to determine.

---

(1)  OJ C 16, 18.1.2016.

---
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-17-00817-CR

Jayson Robert SPONABLE,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 2, Guadalupe County, Texas

Trial Court No. CCL-16-1291

Honorable Frank Follis, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ANGELINI, JUSTICE BARNARD, AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is 

AFFIRMED. 

SIGNED December 27, 2018.

_____________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice
# Official Journal C 126/2017

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 126 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6021 April 2017 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 126

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6021 April 2017

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Preparatory Acts |
| | COUNCIL |
| 2017/C 126/01 | Position (EU) No 3/2017 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on in vitro diagnostic medical devices and repealing Directive 98/79/EC and Commission Decision 2010/227/EU Adopted by the Council on 7 March 2017 (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| 2017/C 126/02 | Statement on the Council's reasons: Position (EU) No 3/2017 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on in vitro diagnostic medical devices and repealing Directive 98/79/EC and Commission Decision 2010/227/EU | 155 |

Notice No

Contents

page

III   Preparatory Acts

COUNCIL

2017/C 126/01

Position (EU) No 3/2017 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on in vitro diagnostic medical devices and repealing Directive 98/79/EC and Commission Decision 2010/227/EU Adopted by the Council on 7 March 2017 (
  1
  )

in vitro

1

1

2017/C 126/02

Statement on the Council's reasons: Position (EU) No 3/2017 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on in vitro diagnostic medical devices and repealing Directive 98/79/EC and Commission Decision 2010/227/EU

in vitro

155

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN