alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .

                               UGI UTILITIES INC.
        COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES - EXHIBIT 12.1
                             (THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                   Six
                                                  Months
                                                  Ended            Year Ended September 30,
                                                March 31,  -----------------------------------------
                                                   2005      2004       2003       2002       2001
                                                ---------  --------   --------   --------   --------
<S>                                             <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>
EARNINGS:
Earnings before income taxes                    $ 88,539   $ 83,098   $100,212   $ 73,665   $ 79,568
Interest expense                                   9,028     17,698     17,412     16,365     18,724
Amortization of debt discount and expense            120        233        244        287        264
Estimated interest component of rental expense       781      1,477      1,434      1,563      1,541
                                                --------   --------   --------   --------   --------
                                                $ 98,468   $102,506   $119,302   $ 91,880   $100,097
                                                ========   ========   ========   ========   ========
FIXED CHARGES:
Interest expense                                $  9,028   $ 17,698   $ 17,412   $ 16,365   $ 18,724
Amortization of debt discount and expense            120        233        244        287        264
Allowance for funds used during
   construction (capitalized interest)                 3         11          7         19         12
Estimated interest component of rental expense       781      1,477      1,434      1,563      1,541
                                                --------   --------   --------   --------   --------
                                                $  9,932   $ 19,419   $ 19,097   $ 18,234   $ 20,541
                                                ========   ========   ========   ========   ========

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                  9.91       5.28       6.25       5.04       4.87
                                                ========   ========   ========   ========   ========
</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

| I, Frederick   M. Strader, as Chief Executive Officer of United Industrial Corporation (the   “Company”) certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted by Section   906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 |
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 | a. | the   accompanying Form 10-Q report for the period ended September 30, 2004 as   filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”) fully   complies with the requirements of Section 13a or 15(d) of the Securities   Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 |   |   |
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 | b. | the   information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material   respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
**Important legal notice**

*|*

# 12006E077

**Treaty establishing the European Community (consolidated version) - Part Three - Community policies - TITLE V - Transport - Article 77***Official Journal C 321 E , 29/12/2006 P. 0072 - 0072 Official Journal C 325 , 24/12/2002 P. 0063 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0207 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 224 , 31/08/1992 P. 0028 - Consolidated version (EEC Treaty - no official publication available)*

Article 77

Charges or dues in respect of the crossing of frontiers which are charged by a carrier in addition to the transport rates shall not exceed a reasonable level after taking the costs actually incurred thereby into account.

Member States shall endeavour to reduce these costs progressively.

The Commission may make recommendations to Member States for the application of this Article.

--------------------------------------------------
# C_2015127EN.01001001.xml

| 20.4.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 127/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.4.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 127/10

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Budapest Környéki Törvényszék (Hungary) lodged on 21 January 2015 — Criminal proceedings against István Balogh

(Case C-25/15)

(2015/C 127/15)

Language of the case: Hungarian

Referring court

Referring court

Budapest Környéki Törvényszék

Party to the main proceedings

Party to the main proceedings

István Balogh

Question referred

Question referred

Article 1(1) of Directive 2010/64/EU (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 October 2010 on the right to interpretation and translation in criminal proceedings reads: ‘This Directive lays down rules concerning the right to interpretation and translation in criminal proceedings and proceedings for the execution of an European arrest warrant’. Must this formulation be taken to mean, inter alia, that, during a special procedure (Chapter XXIX of a büntetőeljárásról szóló 1998. évi XIX. törvény (Law XIX of 1998 on criminal procedure)), a court in Hungary must apply this Directive, that is to say, must a special procedure under Hungarian law be regarded as being covered by the expression ‘criminal proceedings’, or must this expression be interpreted as referring only to procedures which conclude with a final decision concerning the criminal liability of the defendant?

1

---

(1)  OJ 2010 L 280, p. 1.

1

---
# C_2015414EN.01004501.xml

| 14.12.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 414/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.12.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 414/45

---

Action brought on 9 October 2015 — ZZ v Commission

(Case F-131/15)

(2015/C 414/57)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: S. Orlandi and T. Martina, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the Commission’s decision not to reclassify the applicant as grade AD 13 for the 2013 reclassification year.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Tribunal should:

| — | annul the decision of the authority empowered to conclude contracts of employment not to reclassify the applicant as grade AD 13 for the 2013 reclassification year; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the authority empowered to conclude contracts of employment not to reclassify the applicant as grade AD 13 for the 2013 reclassification year;

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs.

---
##### 



Exhibit 99(c)

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of TRW Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert H. Swan, the
Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
the best of my knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Robert H. Swan

Robert H. Swan
Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
November 6, 2002
Unassociated Document


    


    Exhibit
      10.3

    


    Korea
      Milestone Acquisition Corporation

    


    


    [ 
],
      2008

    


    


    SF
      Venture Town Co., Ltd.

    SoftForum
      Building

    545-7
      Dogokdong

    Gangnam,
      Seoul, Korea 135-170

    


    Ladies
      and Gentlemen:

    


    This
      letter will confirm our agreement that commencing on the date of the final
      prospectus for the initial public offering of the securities of Korea Milestone
      Acquisition Corporation (the “Company”),
      SF
      Venture Town Co., Ltd. shall make available to the Company certain office space,
      administrative services and secretarial support, as may be required by the
      Company, situated at the SoftForum Building, 8th
      Floor,
      545-7 Dogokdong, Gangnam, Seoul, Korea 135-170. In exchange therefor, the
      Company shall pay the sum of US$7,500 per month until the earlier of (i) the
      consummation of the Company’s initial business combination and (ii) the
      Company’s liquidation.

    


    


    [Remainder
      of Page Intentionally Left Blank]

    


    
      
         

      

      
         

        
          

        

      

      
         

      

    

     

    
      	 	 	 
	 	
              Very
                truly yours,

              


              Korea
                Milestone Acquisition Corporation

            
	 
 	 
 	 
 
	 	By:  	 
	 	
              

              Name:
                

              Title:
                

            


    

    


    
      
        	
                Agreed
                  and Accepted

                


                SF
                  Venture Town Co., Ltd.  

              	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	By:	 	 	 	 
	 	
                

                Name:
                  

                Title:
                  

              	 	 	
              


      

    

     

     

    
      
         

      

      
        2
# C_2016454EN.01000901.xml

| 5.12.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 454/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.12.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 454/9

---

Order of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 8 September 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale amministrativo regionale per il Lazio — Italy) — Google Ireland Limited, Google Italy Srl v Autorità per le Garanzie nelle Comunicazioni

(Case C-322/15) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Lack of sufficient information concerning the factual and legal context of the dispute in the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need for a reply to the question referred - Manifest inadmissibility))

(2016/C 454/18)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Tribunale amministrativo regionale per il Lazio

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Google Ireland Limited, Google Italy Srl

Defendant: Autorità per le Garanzie nelle Comunicazioni

Intervening parties: Filandolarete Srl, Associazione Confindustria Radio Televisioni, Federazione Italiana Editori Giornali (FIEG)

Operative part of the order

The request for a preliminary ruling brought by the Tribunale amministrativo regionale per il Lazio (Regional Administrative Court for Lazio, Italy), by decision of 22 April 2015, is manifestly inadmissible.

---

(1)  OJ C 320, 28.9.2015.

---
III 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 84 

Condemning violence and criminality by the Irish Republican Army in 

Northern Ireland. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 17, 2005 

Mr. KENNEDY (for himself, Mr. MCCAIN, Mr. DODD, Mrs. CLINTON, Mr. 

BIDEN, Mr. LEAHY, Mr. LAUTENBERG, Mr. SMITH, and Mr. GREGG) 

submitted the following resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Condemning violence and criminality by the Irish Republican 

Army in Northern Ireland. 

Whereas on January 30, 2005, a Catholic citizen of Belfast, 

Northern Ireland, Robert McCartney, was brutally murdered by members of the Irish Republican Army, who attempted to cover-up the crime and ordered all witnesses 

to be silent about the involvement of Irish Republican 

Army members; 

Whereas the sisters of Robert McCartney, Catherine 

McCartney, Paula Arnold, Gemma McMacken, Claire 

McCartney, and Donna Mary McCartney, and his 

fiance ́e, Bridgeen Karen Hagans, refused to accept the 

code of silence and have bravely challenged the Irish Re-
2 

•SRES 84 ATS

publican Army by demanding justice for the murder of 

Robert McCartney; 

Whereas when outcry over the murder increased, the Irish 

Republican Army expelled 3 members, and 7 members of 

Sinn Fein, the political wing of the Irish Republican 

Army, were suspended from the party; 

Whereas the leadership of Sinn Fein has called for justice, 

but has not called on those responsible for the murder or 

any of those who witnessed the murder to cooperate directly with the Police Service of Northern Ireland; 

Whereas on March 8, 2005, the Irish Republican Army 

issued an outrageous statement in which it said it ‘‘was 

willing to shoot the killers of Robert McCartney’’; and 

Whereas peace and violence cannot coexist in Northern Ireland: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That— 

2 (1) the Senate joins the people of the United 

3 States in deploring and condemning violence and 

4 criminality by the Irish Republican Army in North5 ern Ireland; and 

6 (2) it is the sense of the Senate that— 

7 (A) the sisters and fiance ́e of Robert 

8 McCartney deserve the full support of the 

9 United States in their pursuit of justice; 

10 (B) the leadership of Sinn Fein should in11 sist that those responsible for the murder and 

12 witnesses to the murder cooperate directly with 

13 the Police Service of Northern Ireland and be 
3 

•SRES 84 ATS

1 protected fully from any retaliation by the Irish 

2 Republican Army; and 

3 (C) the Government of the United States 

4 should offer all appropriate assistance to law 

5 enforcement authorities in Northern Ireland to 

6 see that the murderers of Robert McCartney 

7 are brought to justice. 

Æ
# C_2015429EN.01000801.xml

| 21.12.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 429/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.12.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 429/8

---

Appeal brought on 26 January 2015 by Cantina Broglie 1 Srl against the judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) delivered on 27 November 2014 in Case T-153/11 Cantina Broglie 1 v OHIM

Cantina Broglie 1

OHIM

(Case C-33/15 P)

(2015/C 429/10)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Cantina Broglie 1 Srl (represented by: A. Rizzoli, avvocato)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) and Camera di Commercio, Industria, Artigianato e Agricoltura di Verona

Other parties to the proceedings:

By order of 15 October 2015 the Court (Ninth Chamber) dismissed the appeal and ordered Cantina Broglie 1 Srl to bear its own costs.

---
Exhibit 10.17


 





 


***Certain information in this document has been excluded pursuant
to Regulation S-K, Item 601(a)(6). Such excluded information is not
material and disclosure thereof would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. Such omitted information is indicated
by brackets (“[***]”)
in this exhibit.***


 


February 9, 2021


 


Reed Fawell, IV





[***]


 


Executive Compensation Plan


 


Dear Reed,


 


We are pleased to share the following revision of your
compensation.


 


Updates are as follows:


 


		1.	Your annualized base Salary will increase to $250,000, effective, August 1, 2020.



 


		2.	You will be granted the Option to purchase 100,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock at a price per share equal to
the fair market value per share of the Common Stock on the date of grant, as determined by the Company’s Board of Directors, and
subject to Board approval. Ten percent (10%) of the shares subject to the option shall vest 12 months after the date your vesting begins
subject to your continuing employment with the Company, and no shares shall vest before such date. The remaining shares shall vest quarterly
according to the following per-year schedule: 20%, 35%, 35% subject to your continuing employment with the Company. This option grant
shall be subject to the terms and conditions of the Company’s Equity Incentive Plan and Stock Option Agreement, including vesting
requirements. No right to any stock is earned or accrued until such time that vesting occurs, nor does the grant confer any right to continue
vesting or employment.



 


		3.	According to our SLT Performance-based bonus structure, hitting 100% of personal and company joint accountability goals would result
in an annualized bonus target of $175,000, to be evaluated and paid out quarterly.



 


		4.	Additionally, you’re eligible for a year-end bonus target $40,000 aligned to personal and company objectives and subject to
executive compensation guidelines.



 


This compensation summary supersedes previous salary,
commission, and bonus structure. Titles, compensation, and benefits may be changed at the discretion of the Company and employment remains
at-will.


 


Congratulations and thank you for your contributions!


 


Sincerely,


Tim Hwang


 


	/s/ Tim Hwang	 




 


CEO
Before the Third Division,

February 5, 1942

No. 46925.

#### Protest 22007-K of C. F. Ekstrom (Pembina).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

A representative of the importer testified but inasmuch as his information had been given to him by the importer his testimony was held inadmissible. It appeared from the official papers that the collector acted legally under the authority of section 503 (a)'. Nothing in the papers showed currency other than that of the United States. The merchandise was appraised as entered, that is, appraised in United States currency at the unit values on the invoice. *Ciba*v. *United States*(14 Ct. Cust. Appls. 309, T. D. 41913) cited.' The defendant moved to dismiss the protest on the ground that the case should have been appealed to reappraisement. Since the entered and appraised values of the merchandise were the same this motion was denied. *Andrews*v. *United States*(29 C. C. P. A. 131, C. A. D. 182) cited. On the record presented the protest was overruled.
Inspire 1 Pro In the Box Inspire 1 Pro Quick Start Guide Safety Guidelines and Disclaimer Intelligent Flight Battery Safety Guidelines

© 2015 DJI. All Rights Reserved. 

# INSPIRE 1 PRO

Harness ×1 (Complementary) Carrying Case ×1 (Complementary) Camera with Gimbal Box ×1 (Complementary) Aircraft Body ×1 Remote Controller ×1 Camera with Gimbal Kit ×1 including camera cap, lens front cap and lens rear cap

Propellers (Pair) ×4 Gimbal Clamp ×1 Intelligent Flight Battery (TB47) ×1

Battery Charger ×1 Manuals

Power Cable ×1 Remote Controller Charging Cable ×1 (Complementary) Micro-USB Cables ×2 (Complementary) 

# In the Box Check that all of the following items are included in the package. If any items are missing, please contact your seller.

SD Card ( 16GB ) ×1 (Complementary)

* Complementaries are not covered by Warranty.
OXIDES OF SULFUR ANNUAL EMISSION REPORT Intermountain Power Service Corporation Company ID -240 Intermountain Generation Station Site ID - 10327

SUMMARY OF ANNUAL SOxEMISSIONS SUBMITTED TO EPA FOR ACID RAIN PROGRAM Component Company Adjusted ID ID Component 1999 2006 Actuals 2381 1.0 Utility Boiler-Coal fired 1566.4 2240.7 2229.5 2382 2.0 Utility Boiler Coal Fired 2131.8 2019.6 2009.5 2399 21.0 Aux. Boilers 1A & 1B See below 4260.3 4239 7237 1.0a Utility Boiler Start-up See below 1.97 1.97 7239 2.0a Utility Boiler Start-up See below 4262.27 4240 .97

CHANGES IN MONITORING OR CALCULATION METHODS Component Company ID ID 2381 1.0

Component Company ID ID 2382 2.0

Component Company ID ID Component 2399 21.0 Component Utility Boiler-Coal fired Explanation of Change:

Adjustment of 2006 emissions to be comparable to 19 99 emissions: 2006 SO2 emissions with WAF=0.995 (2229.5 tons) as reported in Part 75 EDR Wall Adjustment Factor (WAF) of 0.995 used on Flow RATA.

Component Utility Boiler Coal Fired Explanation of Change: 2229.5/0.995 = 2240.7 tons adjusted.

Adjustment of 2006 emissions to be comparable to 19 99 emissions: 2006 SO2 emissions with WAF=0.995 (2009.5 tons) asreported in Part 75 EDR Wall Adjustment Factor (WAF) of 0.995 used on Flow RATA.

Aux. Boilers 1A & 1B Explanation of Change: 2009.5/0.995 = 2019.6 tons adjusted.Component Company

ID ID 7237 1.0a Adjustment of 2006 emissions to be comparable to 19 99 emissions:

Component Utility Boiler Start-up Explanation of Change:

Adjustment of 2006 emissions to be comparable to 19 99 emissions: These emissions are reported as part of Component I D. 2381Component Company

ID ID 7239 2.0a Component Utility Boiler Start-up

Adjustment of 2006 emissions to be comparable to 19 99 emissions: Explanation of Change: These emisssions are reported as part of Component ID. 2382Change Adjustments

11.2 2240.7 10.1 2019.6 21.3 4260.3

1.97 21.3 4262.27