alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(logo)Berkadia

 

 

Annual Statement as toCompliance 

For the YearEnded December 31, 2017****

 

*MorganStanley Capital I Trust,   *

*Series2016-UBS9*

 

Pursuant to Section 3.06 (f) oftheSubservicing Agreement governing the referenced transaction (the “ServicingAgreement”), I hereby attest that: 

 

        i.           A review of the activities and performanceof Berkadia as Subservicer during the period has been made under mysupervision.

 

      ii.           To the best of my knowledge, based on suchreview, Berkadia as Subservicer has fulfilled, in all material respects, itsobligations under this Subservicing Agreement throughout the period and nodefault by the Subservicer under the Subservicing Agreement has occurred and iscontinuing.

 

Berkadia,

/s/ Mark E.McCool

Mark E. McCool

President

February 10, 2018

 

 

Inv. 261 Lib. A Inv 870 LibN
No. 40363.

#### Protests 780948-G, etc., of T. E. Ash.

C. D. 57. Application by plaintiff for rehearing denied.
No. 41981.

#### Protests 36571-G, etc., of Gimbel Bros. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the merchandise in question was held dutiable as follows: (1) articles in chief value of artificial silk at 60 percent under paragraph 31, Abstract 37230 followed; (2) filet lace articles, Normandy lace articles and embroidered hats and wearing apparel at 75 percent under paragraph 1430, *United States*v. *Jabara*(22 C. C. P. A. 77, T. D. 47065), *United States*v. Amrein (26 C. C. P. A. 353, C. A. D. 40), and *Pustet*v. *United States*(13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 530, T. D. 41396) followed; (3) artificial fruits at 60 percent under paragraph 1419, on the authority of *Robinson-Goodman*v. *United States*(17 C. C. P. A. 149, T. D. 43473); (4) hats in chief value of silk at 60 percent under paragraph 1210; and (5) hats in chief value of cellulose filaments at 60 percent under paragraph 31, *Amberg*v. *United States*(T. D. 46204) followed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                            SEP-30-1999
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                        967729
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                       967729
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                         967729
<EQUITIES>                                    2125
<MORTGAGE>                                       0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                    0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                              969854
<CASH>                                       79909
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                           55874
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                       20868
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             1430707
<POLICY-LOSSES>                             276620
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                         238518
<POLICY-OTHER>                                   0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                            0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                              78750
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                    448526
<OTHER-SE>                                  303402
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               1430707
<PREMIUMS>                                  577879
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                          48781
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                            3343
<OTHER-INCOME>                                   0
<BENEFITS>                                  436465
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                  60034
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                         13237
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             114859
<INCOME-TAX>                                 34650
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          80209
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                 80209
<EPS-BASIC>                                  .92
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .92
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                   0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                              0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                               0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                 0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                  0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                          0


</TABLE>
# C_2017374EN.01001101.xml

| 6.11.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 374/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.11.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 374/11

---

Order of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 September 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bezirksgericht Linz — Austria) — Peter Schotthöfer & Florian Steiner GbR v Eugen Adelsmayr

(Case C-473/15) (1)

1

((Requests for a preliminary ruling - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Extradition of a national of a Member State of the European Union to a third State where he risks being subjected to the death penalty - Citizenship of the Union - Articles 18 and 21 TFEU - Article 19(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Protection against extradition))

(2017/C 374/14)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Bezirksgericht Linz

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Peter Schotthöfer & Florian Steiner GbR

Applicant:

Defendant: Eugen Adelsmayr

Defendant:

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

Article 19(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union must be interpreted as meaning that a request for extradition originating from a third country concerning a Union citizen who, in exercising his freedom of movement, leaves his Member State of origin in order to reside on the territory of another Member State, must be rejected by the latter Member State where that citizen runs a serious risk of being subjected to the death penalty in the event of extradition.

---

(1)  OJ C 406, 7.12.2015.

1

---
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 80 (Thursday, April 26, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 20846]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-7958]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Sunshine Act; Notice of Meeting, Notice of Vote, Explanation of 
Action Closing Meeting and List of Persons To Attend

April 19, 2007.
    The following notice of meeting is published pursuant to Section 
3(a) of the Government in the Sunshine Act (Pub. L. No. 94-409), 5 
U.S.C. 552b:

Agency Holding Meeting: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.

Date and Time: April 26, 2007, 9:30 a.m.

Place: Room 2C, Commission Meeting Room, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426.

Status: Closed.

Matters to be Considered: Non-Public, Investigations and Inquiries, 
Enforcement Related Matters.

For Further Information Contact: Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary, Telephone 
(202) 502-8400.
    Chairman Kelliher and Commissioners Kelly, Spitzer, Moeller, and 
Wellinghoff voted to hold a closed meeting on April 26, 2007. The 
certification of the General Counsel explaining the action closing the 
meeting is available for public inspection in the Commission's Public 
Reference Room at 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The Chairman and the Commissioners, their assistants, the 
Commission's Secretary, the General Counsel and members of his staff, 
and a stenographer are expected to attend the meeting. Other staff 
members from the Commission's program offices who will advise the 
Commissioners in the matters discussed will also be present.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-7958 Filed 4-25-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
# C_2016090EN.01002702.xml

| 7.3.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 90/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.3.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 90/27

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 27 January 2016 — Glantenay and Others v Commission

(Case F-85/15) (1)

1

(2016/C 090/37)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 262, 10/8/2015, p. 42.

1

---
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Corporate Trust Services**

  MAC R1204-010  9062 Old Annapolis Road  Columbia, MD 21045  Tel: 410 884 2000  Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

Re: Annual Statement ofCompliance for JPMCC Commercial Mortgage Securities Trust 2015-JP1, CommercialMortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2015-JP1

 

Per the Pooling and Servicing Agreementdated as of December 1, 2015 (the "Agreement"), the undersigned, aduly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the yearending December 31, 2016 (the "Reporting Period"):

 

(a) A review of Wells Fargo'sactivities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under theAgreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and

 

(b) To the best of suchofficer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of itsobligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

 

February 27, 2017

 

 

/s/ Brian Smith

BRIAN SMITH

Vice President

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll  go far |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------|
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-07-00528-CR

In re Sterling Shepard

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 147TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 9034124, HONORABLE WILFORD FLOWERS, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant Sterling Shepard was convicted for possessing more than four grams of

cocaine. This conviction was affirmed. See Shepard v. State, No. 03-04-00038-CR, 2006 Tex. App.

LEXIS 2793 (Tex. App.—Austin, Apr. 6, 2006, pet. ref’d) (mem. op., not designated for

publication). On June 22, 2007, Shepard filed a pro se motion for forensic DNA testing of the bag

in which the cocaine was found. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 64.01 (West Supp. 2007). The

district court denied the motion in a written order dated August 10, 2007, and this appeal followed.

Shepard represents himself on appeal. On December 10, 2007, Shepard was notified

that his brief was overdue and advised that if he did not respond by January 11, 2008, the appeal

would be submitted for decision without briefs. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b). Shepard has not filed

a brief or otherwise responded to the Court’s notice.

The district court concluded that Shepard had not established by a preponderance of

the evidence that he would not have been convicted if exculpatory results had been obtained through
2

DNA testing. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 64.03(a)(2)(A) (West Supp. 2007).

This conclusion is supported by the record. We find no error that should be considered in the

interest of justice.

The order denying forensic DNA testing is affirmed.

__________________________________________

Bob Pemberton, Justice

Before Chief Justice Law, Justices Pemberton and Waldrop

Affirmed

Filed: March 12, 2008

Do Not Publish
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 111 

Expressing the sense of Congress that Lionel Hampton should be honored 

for his contributions to American music. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 16, 2007 

Mr. RANGEL submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred 

to the Committee on Education and Labor 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of Congress that Lionel Hampton 

should be honored for his contributions to American music. 

Whereas Lionel Hampton was one of the Nation’s greatest 

jazz musicians, composers, and band leaders; 

Whereas Lionel Hampton was one of the first musicians to 

play the vibraphone in jazz, setting the standard for mastery of that instrument; 

Whereas Lionel Hampton nurtured and inspired many of the 

greatest performers of jazz music who would go on to 

fame in their own right; 

Whereas Lionel Hampton shattered the racial barriers of his 

time when he was recruited to perform with the Benny 

Goodman band in the 1930s, creating for the first time 

an integrated public face of jazz music; 


rmajette on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
2 

•HCON 111 IH 

Whereas Lionel Hampton, with his performances around the 

world, was a musical ambassador of goodwill and friendship for the United States; 

Whereas Lionel Hampton was never deterred by fame from 

contributing to the Harlem, New York, community that 

he viewed as his home; 

Whereas Lionel Hampton was active in the development of 

affordable housing, such as Harlem’s Gladys Hampton 

Houses, named after his late wife, the former Gladys 

Riddle; 

Whereas Lionel Hampton performed at the White House 

under Republican and Democratic presidents and was 

honored with the Presidential Gold Medal by President 

Bill Clinton; and 

Whereas Lionel Hampton was born in Louisville, Kentucky 

on April 20, 1908, and died in New York City on August 

31, 2002: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that Lionel 

3 Hampton should be honored for his contributions to Amer4 ican music and for his work as an ambassador of goodwill 

5 and democracy. 

Æ 


rmajette on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
# C_2016118EN.01000401.xml

| 4.4.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 118/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.4.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 118/4

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf (Germany) lodged on 14 December 2015 — Lohmann & Rauscher International GmbH & Co. KG v BIOS Naturprodukte GmbH

(Case C-662/15)

(2016/C 118/05)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant and appellant: Lohmann & Rauscher International GmbH & Co. KG

Applicant and appellant:

Defendant and respondent: BIOS Naturprodukte GmbH

Defendant and respondent:

Question referred

Question referred

Are Article 1(2)(f), Article 11, point 13 of Annex I and the last indent of point 3 of Annex VII [to Council Directive 93/42/EEC of 14 June 1993 concerning medical devices] (1) to be interpreted as meaning that a further conformity assessment procedure is required for the marketing of a Class I medical device, which has been made subject to a conformity assessment procedure by the manufacturer and lawfully bears the CE marking affixed by the manufacturer, where the information relating to the central pharmaceutical number (Pharmazentralnummer) on the outer packaging of the medical device has been concealed by a sticker which provides the importer’s details and the central pharmaceutical number granted to that importer, the other information remaining visible?

1

---

(1)  OJ 1993 L 169, p. 1.

1

---
EXHIBIT 32.1
 
 
 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
 SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In connection with the quarterly report of United-Guardian, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the three-month period ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Kenneth H. Globus,  President of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (i) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (ii) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented and results of operations of the Company for the periods presented.
 
 
 Date:  November 10, 2010                                                                                          By: /s/ Kenneth H. Globus
 Kenneth H. Globus
No. 53758.

protests 63827-K, etc. (Duluth).

#### V. W. Davis et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
Before the Second Division,

February 5, 1942

No. 46923.

#### Protests 17877-K, etc., of Benj. Wolf Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

The evidence showed that some of the woven silk mufflers were hemmed. Those which were imported subsequent to the effective date of the British Trade Agreement (T. D. 49753) were held dutiable at 45> percent under paragraph 1209 and T. D. 49753. Those imported prior to the British Trade Agreement were accordingly held dutiable at 60 percent under paragraph 1209.
# C_2015073EN.01002001.xml

| 2.3.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 73/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.3.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 73/20

---

Application for authorisation to serve an attachment order brought on 12 January 2015 — La Chaine hôtelière La Frontière, Shotef SPRL v European Commission

(Case C-1/15 SA)

(2015/C 073/27)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: La Chaine hôtelière La Frontière, Shotef SPRL (represented by: J. Steyt, avocat)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Declare the present application to be admissible and well founded; |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare the present application to be admissible and well founded;

Consequently:

| — | primarily, authorise the applicant to maintain and continue the attachment order already served and to serve other attachment orders on the European Union/European Commission for all sums, funds, assets or objects generally that it has or will subsequently have in its possession, owes or will subsequently owe for any reason and on any grounds whatever to the Democratic Republic of Congo; |
| --- | --- |

—

primarily, authorise the applicant to maintain and continue the attachment order already served and to serve other attachment orders on the European Union/European Commission for all sums, funds, assets or objects generally that it has or will subsequently have in its possession, owes or will subsequently owe for any reason and on any grounds whatever to the Democratic Republic of Congo;

| — | in the alternative, authorise the applicant to maintain and continue the attachment order already served and to serve other attachment orders on the European Union/European Commission for all sums, funds, assets or objects generally that it has or will subsequently have in its possession, owes or will subsequently owe on the basis of a private contract to the Democratic Republic of Congo; |
| --- | --- |

—

in the alternative, authorise the applicant to maintain and continue the attachment order already served and to serve other attachment orders on the European Union/European Commission for all sums, funds, assets or objects generally that it has or will subsequently have in its possession, owes or will subsequently owe on the basis of a private contract to the Democratic Republic of Congo;

In any event:

| — | order the European Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the European Commission to pay the costs.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 158 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 158

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),  
That when the House adjourns on the legislative day of Thursday, May 
24, 2007, Friday, May 25, 2007, or Saturday, May 26, 2007, on a motion 
offered pursuant to this concurrent resolution by its Majority Leader 
or his designee, it stand adjourned until 2 p.m. on Tuesday, June 5, 
2007, or until the time of any

              

 reassembly pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution, 
whichever occurs first; and that when the Senate recesses or adjourns 
on Friday, May 25, 2007, Saturday, May 26, 2007, or on any day from 
Monday, May 28, 2007, through Saturday, June 2, 2007, on a motion 
offered pursuant to this concurrent resolution by its Majority Leader 
or his designee, it stand recessed or adjourned until noon on Monday, 
June 4, 2007, or such other time on that day as may be specified by its 
Majority Leader or his designee in the motion to recess or adjourn, or 
until the time of any reassembly pursuant to section 2 of this 
concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first.
    Sec. 2. The Speaker of the House and the Majority Leader of the 
Senate, or their respective designees, acting jointly after 
consultation with the Minority Leader of the House and the Minority 
Leader of the Senate, shall notify the Members of the House and the 
Senate, respectively, to reassemble at such place and time as they may 
designate if, in their opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 24, 2007.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
110th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                            H. CON. RES. 158

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Providing for a conditional adjournment of the House of Representatives 
         and a conditional recess or adjournment of the Senate.
```
Exhibit 12.1

 

 

United Air Lines, Inc. and Subsidiary Companies

Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges