alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2016106EN.01002401.xml

| 21.3.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 106/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.3.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 106/24

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Piemonte (Italy) lodged on 28 December 2015 — MB srl v Società Metropolitana Acque Torino (SMAT)

(Case C-697/15)

(2016/C 106/25)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Piemonte

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: MB srl

Applicant:

Defendant: Società Metropolitana Acque Torino (SMAT)

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Do the Community principles of the protection of legitimate expectations and legal certainty, together with the principles of the free movement of goods, the freedom of establishment and the freedom to provide services, laid down in the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), as well as the principles deriving therefrom, such as equality of treatment, non-discrimination, mutual recognition, proportionality and transparency, referred to (most recently) in Directive 2014/24/EU, (1) preclude national legislation, such as the Italian legislation founded on the combined provisions of Articles 87(4) and 86(3a) of Legislative Decree No 163 of 2006 and Article 26(6) of Legislative Decree No 81 of 2008, as interpreted, with a view to securing proper respect for, and uniform application of, the law, pursuant to Article 99 of the Code of Administrative Procedure, by judgments No 3 and No 9 of 2015 of the Plenary Assembly of the Consiglio di Stato, according to which the failure to list the corporate safety and security costs separately in tenders in a procedure for the award of a public works contract inevitably results in the exclusion of the tendering undertaking concerned, even in the case where the obligation to list that information separately was not set out either in the tender rules or on the attached form to be completed for the submission of the tender, and even though, in substantive terms, the tender in question took into account the minimum costs of corporate safety and security?

1

---

(1)  Directive 2014/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on public procurement and repealing Directive 2004/18/EC (OJ 2014 L 94, p. 65).

1

---
ATTORNEYS AT LAW 

October 30, 2012 

VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS 

Assistant General Counsel 

Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott, LLC 

1717 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. 

12'h Floor 

Washington, p:o. 2DQqJ6 t'; t , 1 i 1"- ~ 1 __ l ':1 ; t...._n 

·-, ~~~~}j,f/\T/(J;< 

' .... l 

- "; ~j!-

Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings; C-70 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Attn: Kimberly Graber 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Room W96-322 

Washington, DC 20590 

1a 202 659 6600 

FAX 202 659 6699 

www.eckertseamans.com 

Drew M. Derco 

Direct dial: 202.659.6665 

Email: dderco@eckertseamans.com 

Re: Quarterly Report of Cathay Pacific Airways Limited Regarding 

Passenger Transfers 

Dear Ms. Graber: 

Please find enclosed the statement of Cathay Pacific Airways Limited ("Cathay Pacific") 

regarding passenger transfers for the third quarter of2012 as required by the August 3, 2009 and 

April1, 2010 approvals of Cathay Pacific's requests for equivalent alternative determination. In 

those approvals, the Department of Transportation required Cathay Pacific to "within 30 days 

after each calendar quarter, provide the Enforcement Office with copies of all complaints, if any, 

regarding passenger transfers to and from its first and business class seats." (See Paragraph C(4) 

of August 3, 2009 and April1, 2010 approvals; Docket OST-2008-0273-0073). 

Should you have any questions or require any additional information, please do not hesitate to 

contact us directly. 

E s,:j"!T'" . Sahr, Esq. 

Drew M. Derco, Esq. 

Counsel for Cathay Pacific Airways Limited 

Enclosure 
19 October 2012 

Assistant General Counsel 

Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings 

C-70 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey A venue, SE 

Room W96-322 

Washington, DC 20590 

Dear Sirs, 

~ 

l~ CATHAY PACIFIC 

Cathay Pacific Airways Limited 

lnflight Services Department 

2/F., South Tower 

Cathay Pacific City, 8 Scenic Road 

Hong Kong International Airport 

Lantau, Hong Kong 

www.cathaypacific.com 

Re: Quarterly Report of Cathay Pacific Airways Limited Regarding Passenger Transfers 

As a condition of the approval of Cathay Pacific Airways Limited's ("Cathay Pacific") 

September 5, 2008 and September 10, 2009 requests for equivalent alternative determination, the 

Department of Transportation required Cathay Pacific to "within 30 days after each calendar 

quarter, provide the Enforcement Office with copies of all complaints, if any, regarding 

passenger transfers to and from its first and business class seats." (See Paragraph C(4) of August 

3, 2009 and April 1, 2010 approvals; Docket OST -2008-0273-0073). Accordingly, please note 

that during the third calendar quarter of 2012 (i.e. July through September) Cathay Pacific 

received no complaints regarding passenger transfers to and from its first and business class 

seats. 

Sincerely, 

CATHAY PACIFIC AIRWAYS LTD 

Porn Warakorn Komutanont 

Manager Inflight Services Development & Standards 

member 

Registered office: 35th Floor, Two Pacific Place, 88 Queensway, Hong Kong 

DRAGO NAIR 

~SWIRE
Case: 2:12-cv-00655-JLG-TPK Doc #: 10 Filed: 10/25/12 Page: 1 of 5  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00655-JLG-TPK Doc #: 10 Filed: 10/25/12 Page: 2 of 5  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00655-JLG-TPK Doc #: 10 Filed: 10/25/12 Page: 3 of 5  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00655-JLG-TPK Doc #: 10 Filed: 10/25/12 Page: 4 of 5  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00655-JLG-TPK Doc #: 10 Filed: 10/25/12 Page: 5 of 5  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-11T10:50:07-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
----

|   | **EXHIBIT                31.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY                ACT** |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                        |                                                                      |                                           |
|---------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------|
|                                        | **UNITED                  MORTGAGE TRUST**                                |
|                                   |                                                                 |                                      |
| Date: August                  14, 2007 | By                                                              | /s/ Christine                  A. Griffin |
|                                        | *President                  and Chief Executive                  Officer* |

----
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

PAUL G. MEAD,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D19-2262

[October 10, 2019]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800(a) motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Martin County; Sherwood Bauer, Judge; 

L.T. Case No. 432006CF001665.

Paul G. Mead, Daytona Beach, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Harris v. State, 184 So. 3d 550 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015).

WARNER, GERBER and FORST, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
COMPANY'S  BALANCE  SHEET AND  STATEMENT OF  OPERATIONS  AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND THE NOTE THERETO.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                   1,000

<S>                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            Dec-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                               Jan-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                 Jun-30-2000
<CASH>                                               400
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       1634
<ALLOWANCES>                                         139
<INVENTORY>                                         1413
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    3651
<PP&E>                                              1082
<DEPRECIATION>                                       899
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      4312
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               1124
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                            3160
<OTHER-SE>                                             0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        4312
<SALES>                                             4523
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    4523
<CGS>                                               1683
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       1683
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    2424
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   (3)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      418
<INCOME-TAX>                                         142
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  276
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                         276
<EPS-BASIC>                                          .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        .02



</TABLE>
No. 45159.

#### Protests 45619-K, etc., of J. Ossola Co., Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Keepe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of *LocatelV*v. *United States*(T. D. 49302) it was held that an allowance of *2}{*percent should have been made in the weight of the cheese to compensate for the inedible coverings.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND INCOME STATEMENT OF UGI UTILITIES,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES AS OF AND FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2000 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS IN UGI
UTILITIES, INC.'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED
MARCH 31, 2000.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000100548
<NAME> UGI UTILITIES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           3,838
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   77,457
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,776
<INVENTORY>                                      9,126
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               101,283
<PP&E>                                         840,854
<DEPRECIATION>                                 280,570
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 736,782
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          170,384
<BONDS>                                        172,914
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           20,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        60,259
<OTHER-SE>                                     175,458
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   736,782
<SALES>                                        291,020
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               291,020
<CGS>                                          149,915
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  149,915
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,447
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,407
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 73,389
<INCOME-TAX>                                    28,453
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             44,936
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    44,936
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0<F1>
<FN>
<F1>THERE ARE NO PUBLICLY HELD SHARES OUTSTANDING.





</TABLE>
# C_2016222EN.01005002.xml

| 20.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 222/50 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 222/50

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 3 May 2016 — Pals v Commission

(Case F-95/15) (1)

(2016/C 222/79)

Language of the case: French

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 294, 7/9/2015, p. 84.

---
III 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 634 

Honoring the life and achievements of Tom Carr, Congressional Research 

Service Analyst, and extending the condolences of the Senate on the 

occasion of his death. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 9 (legislative day, DECEMBER 8), 2006 

Mr. STEVENS submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 

agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Honoring the life and achievements of Tom Carr, Congressional Research Service Analyst, and extending the condolences of the Senate on the occasion of his death. 

Whereas Tom Carr served Congress with distinction for 31 

years at the Library of Congress as an analyst for the 

Congressional Research Service; 

Whereas Mr. Carr held a bachelor’s degree in history from 

Catholic University in Washington, D.C., and a master’s 

degree in information systems from Strayer University in 

Fredericksburg, Virginia; 

Whereas Mr. Carr was born in Jacksonville, Illinois, and 

grew up in Atlanta, Georgia; 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
2 

•SRES 634 ATS 

Whereas Mr. Carr was an expert on congressional committees, House and Senate floor procedure, and congressionally created commissions; 

Whereas Mr. Carr was an enthusiastic teacher of congressional procedure to staff, helping them to do their jobs 

better; 

Whereas Mr. Carr was an accomplished and entertaining 

public speaker who founded the Library of Congress 

chapter of the Toastmasters and was president of the 

Capitol Hill Toastmasters; 

Whereas Mr. Carr worked tirelessly and cheerfully in service 

to Congress and set a high example for his colleagues; 

Whereas Mr. Carr was distinguished for the generous enthusiasm with which he met the needs of colleagues and clients alike, as well as for his persistent and expansive 

good humor and wit; and 

Whereas Mr. Carr faithfully discharged his duties and responsibilities in a wide variety of demanding positions in 

public life with honesty, integrity, loyalty, and humility: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) honors the life and achievements of Con3 gressional Research Service Analyst Tom Carr; 

4 (2) expresses profound sorrow upon the occa5 sion of Mr. Carr’s death and extends heartful condo6 lences to those who survive him: his wife Mary 

7 (Mimi), his sons Thomas and John, his mother 

8 Carswella, and his 9 brothers and sisters; and 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
3 

•SRES 634 ATS 

1 (3) expresses its appreciation and respect for 

2 Mr. Carr’s exemplary record as an analyst for Con3 gress. 

Æ 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
Case: 2:12-cv-00605-EAS-NMK Doc #: 126 Filed: 08/08/13 Page: 1 of 15  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00605-EAS-NMK Doc #: 126 Filed: 08/08/13 Page: 2 of 15  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00605-EAS-NMK Doc #: 126 Filed: 08/08/13 Page: 3 of 15  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00605-EAS-NMK Doc #: 126 Filed: 08/08/13 Page: 4 of 15  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00605-EAS-NMK Doc #: 126 Filed: 08/08/13 Page: 5 of 15  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00605-EAS-NMK Doc #: 126 Filed: 08/08/13 Page: 6 of 15  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00605-EAS-NMK Doc #: 126 Filed: 08/08/13 Page: 7 of 15  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00605-EAS-NMK Doc #: 126 Filed: 08/08/13 Page: 8 of 15  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00605-EAS-NMK Doc #: 126 Filed: 08/08/13 Page: 9 of 15  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00605-EAS-NMK Doc #: 126 Filed: 08/08/13 Page: 10 of 15  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00605-EAS-NMK Doc #: 126 Filed: 08/08/13 Page: 11 of 15  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00605-EAS-NMK Doc #: 126 Filed: 08/08/13 Page: 12 of 15  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00605-EAS-NMK Doc #: 126 Filed: 08/08/13 Page: 13 of 15  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00605-EAS-NMK Doc #: 126 Filed: 08/08/13 Page: 14 of 15  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00605-EAS-NMK Doc #: 126 Filed: 08/08/13 Page: 15 of 15  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-11T10:05:32-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
Operator’s name and address: 

Mick Zoske and Colton Penning. 604 Greenfield Avenue, Iowa Falls, IA 50126

The specific applicable regulations from which relief is required (CFRs:

Using our drone for crop scouting and marketing. We want to use the drone to take videos of our 

equipment. The videos of equipment is used for the purpose of marketing

How the operator will maintain an equivalent level of safety or no adverse impact to safety;

We will always use a spotter and keep our drone in line of sight. We intend to communicate 

with airports that operate closely to us or any and all air traffic control facilities. We only want to 

operate during the daytime hours and in applicable weather conditions. If there are other aircraft 

in the area, we will immediately terminate any of our drone flying activities to give operating 

conditions to other aircraft. We recognize the need for safety regulations.

How granting the exemption would be in the public interest

We intend to work with the public out of honoring their intentions on our drone activities. We 

believe using the drone to make videos and pictures of our equipment betters our business for 

marketing purposes. We believe we can operate within the public safely and effectively to 

demonstrate the safety of drone flying practices.

The proposed operations and;

Using the UAS to fly over a field with permission of owner and video record a piece of 

equipment in operation or scout fields for helping customers with farming practices. 

The make and model of the aircraft for proposed operations

DJI PHANTOM 3 ADVANCED and DJI PHANTOM 2
H. Con. Res. 103 Agreed to March 29, 2007

One Hundred Tenth Congress

of the

United States of America 

AT THE FIRST SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday, 

the fourth day of January, two thousand and seven 

Concurrent Resolution

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), That when the House adjourns on the legislative day of 

Thursday, March 29, 2007, or Friday, March 30, 2007, on a motion 

offered pursuant to this concurrent resolution by its Majority Leader 

or his designee, it stand adjourned until 2 p.m. on Monday, April 

16, 2007, or until the time of any reassembly pursuant to section 

2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first; and that 

when the Senate recesses or adjourns on Thursday, March 29, 

2007, on a motion offered pursuant to this concurrent resolution 

by its Majority Leader or his designee, it stand recessed or 

adjourned until noon on Tuesday, April 10, 2007, or such other 

time on that day as may be specified by its Majority Leader or 

his designee in the motion to recess or adjourn, or until the time 

of any reassembly pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first. 

SEC. 2. The Speaker of the House and the Majority Leader 

of the Senate, or their respective designees, acting jointly after 

consultation with the Minority Leader of the House and the 

Minority Leader of the Senate, shall notify the Members of the 

House and the Senate, respectively, to reassemble at such place 

and time as they may designate if, in their opinion, the public 

interest shall warrant it. 

Attest:

Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

Secretary of the Senate.
Exhibit 12.1

United Air Lines, Inc. and SubsidiaryCompanies
Computation of Ratio of Earningsto Fixed Charges    Nine Months Ended September 30    20042003 (In Millions)Earnings:    Lossbefore income taxes$ (1,183)$ (2,455)  Fixedcharges, from below469 525   Interestcapitalized     (1)    (2)        Earnings$  (715)$   (1,932) ===== =====    Fixed charges:      Interestexpense$   347 $  420   Portionof rental expense representative       of the interest factor    122    105        Fixed charges$  469 $  525  ===== =====    Ratio ofearnings to fixed charges(a)(a) ===== =====       
________(a) Earnings were inadequate tocover fixed charges by $1.2 billion in 2004 and $2.5 billion in 2003.