alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Summary of Analytical Results

662 - February 2012

Sample ID 662-GRAB 662-GRAB 662-GRAB 662-GRAB

Date 2/6/12 2/13/12 2/20/12 2/27/12

Top (ft) 0 0 0 0

Total (T)/ Bottom (ft) 0 0 0 0

Analyte units Diss. (D) Duplicate # 1 1 1 1

PFOA ug/L T 2.02 2.14 NQ (<2.00) NQ (<2.00)

ug/L = micrograms per liter or parts per billion (ppb)

ND = not detected (shown as <LOD)

NQ = not quantifiable (shown as <LOQ)

ND<LOD<NQ<LOQ

LOD - limit of detection

LOQ = limit of quantification

Samples were analyzed by Critical Path Services LLC. Reported results 

 represent a single analysis, except for the sample collected on 2/13/12.

 Acceptable precision was obtained and the reported result for the sample

 collected on 2/13/12 represents the average of lab duplicate results.

 The result shown for the sample collected on 2/6/12 is the result from a

 reanalysis (extract reinjection) performed by the lab as additional quality 

 control (QC). The initial analysis result for the sample collected on 2/6/12

 was NQ (<2.00).

 The NJDEP lab certification number for Critical Path Services LLC is PA072.

PFOA = Perfluorooctanoic Acid

ug/L = micrograms per Liter

< and ND = Non detect at stated reporting limit Page 1 of 1

090000648104790a.xls:Sheet1

6/14/2012 3:42 PM
Telephone: (210) 335-2511

LORINA RUMMEL

JUDGE, 144TM DISTRICT COURT

CADENA-REEVES JUSTICE CENTER

300 DOLOROSA, SUITE 2.199

SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 78205

December 4, 2015

The Court ofCriminal Appeals ofTexas

P.O. Box 12308

Capitol Station

Austin, Texas 78711

RE: WR-83,322-02

Trial Court 2007-CR-7397-W2

Ex Parte Robert Piazzi

&3/322-C2.

Facsimile: (210) 335-2503

To The Honorable Court of Criminal Appeals:

By order dated July 21, 2015, the trial court ordered attorneys Shawn C. Brown,

Neil A. Calfas, and Barry Hitchings to send a copy oftheir respective affidavits to the

applicant regarding the above referenced writ application.

On November 30, 2015, the trial court received a letter from Applicant wherein

he states he did not receive affidavits from Neil A. Calfas or Barry Hitchings, and thus

has not had an opportunity to file a brief in response to the affidavits. This court has

directed the District Clerk to send Mr. Calfas' and Mr. Hitchings' affidavits to applicant.

To afford applicant an opportunity to file any supplemental documents with the

trial court, this court is requesting the Court ofCriminal Appeals withhold any ruling on

applicant's post-conviction writ for 45 days from receipt ofthis letter.

cc: Robert Piazzi

TDCJ No. 01766863

Jordan Unit

1992 Helton Road

Pampa, Texas 79065

Sincerely,

yuhfr

Judge Lorina Rummel

144th Judicial District Court

Bexar County, Texas

RECEIVED IN

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

DEC 10 2015

Abel Acosta, Clerk
Cite as 2016 Ark. 331


### SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS

Opinion Delivered October 6, 2016
IN RE COMMITTEE ON CHILD SUPPORT

PER CURIAM Circuit Judge Kenny Johnson of Warren and Mark D’Auteuil , Esq., of Russellville are reappointed to the Supreme Court Committee on Child Support for four

- year terms to expire on November 30, 2020. Court of Appeals Judge Rita Gruber of North Little Rock, James A. McLarty III, Esq., of Newport, and Barbara Morris

- W illiams , Esq., of Little Rock have each served two terms ; however, in light of the fact that they have spent considerable time on the committee’s latest project and it is at a critical stage, they are reappointed for an additional one
- year term to expire on November 30, 2017. The court thanks them for their continued service.
ex_357818.htm


Exhibit 4.25


 





 


 January 13, 2022


 


 Lan Huang


 4506 Delafield Ave Bronx, NY


 US 10471


 


 Dear Lan,


 


We would like to thank you for your commitment to BeyondSpring. Your contributions to the organizations are valued, and we look forward to the new year and to working together to make plinabulin available to patients in need.


 


We have had to make the difficult decision to prioritize the Company’s goals and objectives to optimize resources to bring the most value from the plinabulin franchise and patients. We consider you as an important contributor to this more-focused plan, and hope that you will make the commitment to help BeyondSpring achieve its critical clinical and regulatory goals over the next two years. We have great confidence that we have the right plan in place to go forward, and that it will bring success to the plinabulin programs, and to each of us, individually.


 


We are offering several improvements to your compensation and benefits package, as well as a retention package, to help secure your commitment to achieving our two-year goals. A summary of your revised compensation package can be found below. Your entitlement to the all components of the compensation package, including the retention-related provisions, is contingent upon your continued satisfactory job performance. In the event of your termination by the company for reasons other than performance and voluntary resignation, you will still be entitled to receive all components of the Summary of Compensation shown below.


 


 We are excited to continue working with you and believe that we can, together, achieve great success for plinabulin and for BeyondSpring!


 


 Best regards,


	/s/ Lan Huang	 



 Lan Huang, CEO, Chairman and Co-Founder BeyondSpring Inc.


 28 Liberty St. 39th Floor New York, NY 10005


 


 


 


 


 




 


BeyondSpring Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | 28 Liberty, 39th Floor | New York, NY 10005


Main Tel: (646) 305-6387


www.beyondspringpharma.com





 










 











 


Compensation and Retention Summary


 


January 13, 2022


Lan Huang


 


	 	
			●

				
			2021 Base Salary: $_520,000.00_

			



 


	 	
			●

				
			2021 Bonus Award (50% of target): $_130,000.00_ (to be paid approx. February 15,2022)

			



 


	 	
			●

				
			2022 Cost of Living Adjustment (COLA): 4% = $_20,800.00_

			



 


	 	
			●

				
			New 2022 Base Salary: $_540,800.00_

			



 


	 	
			●

				
			2022 Target Performance Bonus, paid in February 2023 (75% cash, 25% options): $_202,800.00_ (37.5% of 2022 Base Salary)

			



 


	 	
			●

				
			Retention Bonus (subject continued satisfactory performance): $_520,000.00_ (40% cash, 60% options; 50% payable on 12/31/2022 and 50% payable on 12/31/2023)

			



 


	 	
			●

				
			Company will increase its contribution to cost of medical benefits to 100%.

			



 


	 	
			●

				
			In lieu of the current 401K match in 2022, Company will make a one-time contribution to your 401K retirement savings account equal to 6% of your base salary, up to maximum allowable by IRS regulations.
EXHIBIT 32.1
------------

                              UNITED-GUARDIAN, INC.
                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of  United-Guardian,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Alfred
R. Globus, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  hereby certify,  pursuant to
18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

        (1) the Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2) the  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


Date:  August 10, 2006                   /s/ Alfred R. Globus
                                         --------------------------
                                         Alfred R. Globus
                                         Chief Executive Officer
No. 55442.

#### Capitol Wine & Spirit Corp. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 123879-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

For the reasons stated in *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C. D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
# C_2017046EN.01000701.xml

| 13.2.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 46/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.2.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 46/7

---

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 15 December 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal da Relação do Porto — Portugal) — Alberto José Vieira Azevedo and Others v CED Portugal Unipessoal Lda, Instituto de Seguros de Portugal — Fundo de Garantia Automóvel

(Case C-558/15) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Insurance against civil liability in respect of the use of motor vehicles and enforcement of the obligation to insure against such liability - Directive 2000/26/EC - Article 4(5) - Insurance undertaking - Claims representative - Sufficient powers of representation - Notifications of proceedings before the courts))

(2017/C 046/08)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunal da Relação do Porto

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Alberto José Vieira Azevedo, Maria da Conceição Ferreira da Silva, Carlos Manuel Ferreira Alves, Rui Dinis Ferreira Alves, Vítor José Ferreira Alves

Applicants:

Defendants: CED Portugal Unipessoal Lda, Instituto de Seguros de Portugal — Fundo de Garantia Automóvel

Defendants:

Intervening parties: Institituto de Seguros de Portugal — Fundo de Acidentes de Trabalho

Intervening parties:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 4 of Directive 2000/26/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 May 2000 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to insurance against civil liability in respect of the use of motor vehicles and amending Council Directives 73/239/EEC and 88/357/EEC (Fourth motor insurance Directive), as amended by Directive 2005/14/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2005, must be interpreted as not requiring Member States to provide that the claims representative appointed pursuant to that article may itself be sued, instead of the insurance undertaking which it represents, in the national court before which an action for damages was brought by an injured party falling within the scope of Article 1 of Directive 2000/26, as amended by Directive 2005/14.

---

(1)  OJ C 16, 18.1.2016.

1

---
Before the First Division,

February 5, 1942

No. 46922.

#### Protest 42106-K of B. R. Anderson & Co. (Seattle).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

One package of the merchandise was received in evidence and marked exhibit 1. From an examination of this exhibit it was clear to the court that it is not medicine in doses, as apparently classified by the collector. It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of drugs which have been advanced in value and some of which are crude. There was nothing in the record to indicate that the plaintiffs made any effort to segregate the merchandise, nor was there any evidence produced which would enable the court to determine which of the items are free of duty and which are dutiable. In accordance therewith all of the merchandise in said case which was assessed at 25 percent ad valorem under paragraph 23 was held dutiable as drugs advanced in condition at 10 percent under paragraph 34. The protest was sustained to that extent.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 28, 2019

s0520 

# Order

Clerk May 28, 2019

157757 & (18)

KAY BURKS,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v SC: 157757

COA: 341566

Bay CC: 16

- 003812

- CD

INDEPENDENT BANK,

Defendant

- Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 8, 2018

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion to

stay is DENIED.
Personal communication with D. Bottcher, July 2010.

Soil and Water Engineering Technology, Inc.

Cost estimates for owner/typical agricultural control programs from SWET (2008a) are still

applicable in 2010.
No. 46333.

#### Petition 6127-R of Antony Gibbs & Co., Inc. (Chicago).

Opinion by

Keefe, J."

From a careful consideration of the facts it was found .that the petitioner was without intention to conceal or misrepresent the facts or to defraud the revenue. The petition was therefore granted.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-7061

ALEJANDRE D’CARLOS TABB,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

EDDIE LEE PEARSON, Warden, 

Sussex II State Prison,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, District Judge.

(CA-04-91-7)

Submitted: December 23, 2004 Decided: January 12, 2005

Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Alejandre D’Carlos Tabb, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Drummond

Bagwell, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Alejandre D’Carlos Tabb seeks to appeal the district

court’s orders denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.

§ 2254 (2000) and denying his motion to reconsider under Fed. R.

Civ. P. 59(e). An appeal may not be taken from the final order in

a § 2254 proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A

certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial

showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his

constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive

procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or

wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003);

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d

676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the

record and conclude that Tabb has not made the requisite showing.

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 31.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT





Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act





I, Stuart Ducote, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of United Mortgage Trust (the "Company"), have executed this certification for furnishing to the Securities and Exchange Commission in connection with the filing with the Commission of the registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010 (the "Report"). I hereby certify that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the end of that period.






UNITED MORTGAGE TRUSTDate: May 17, 2010
By
/s/ Stuart DucotePresident
No. 76-591.

#### Borrayo *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-31056

Summary Calendar

OSCAR S GOINS, on behalf of Willie C Goins Estate, on behalf of Oscar Goins,

on behalf of Eary M Goins

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

ALLSTATE INSURANCE CO; MIKE ORTEGO; WILLIE R GOINS

Defendants-Appellees

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 5:07-CV-1444

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Oscar S. Goins, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, appeals the

dismissal, for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, of his complaint against

Allstate Insurance Company, Mike Ortego, and Willie R. Goins. Goins does not

challenge the district court’s conclusion that he failed to show diversity

jurisdiction or present a claim arising under constitutional or federal law.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

September 24, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
07-31056

2

Because Goins fails to challenge the reasons for the dismissal, any contention is

deemed abandoned. See Brinkmann v. Dallas County Deputy Sheriff Abner, 813

F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987). 

Goins’ appeal is without arguable merit and thus frivolous. See Howard

v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). Therefore, it is dismissed as

frivolous. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. Goins is warned that future filings of repetitious

or frivolous appeals may result in the imposition of sanctions. These sanctions

may include dismissal, monetary sanctions, and restrictions on his ability to file

papers in this court and any court subject to this court’s jurisdiction. 

APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.
No. 53754.

protests 102776-K, etc. (New York).

#### Capitol Wine & Spirit Corp. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

For the reasons stated in *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C. D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Regency
Affiliates, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Laurence S. Levy, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the
            Company as of the dates presented and the consolidated result of
            operations of the Company for the periods presented.

Dated: August 19, 2003


                                           /s/ Laurence S. Levy
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Laurence S. Levy
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer
III 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 555 

To authorize the production of records by the Permanent Subcommittee 

on Investigations of the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

AUGUST 3, 2006 

Mr. FRIST (for himself and Mr. REID) submitted the following resolution; 

which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

To authorize the production of records by the Permanent 

Subcommittee on Investigations of the Committee on 

Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. 

Whereas the Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations of 

the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental 

Affairs has been conducting an investigation into the use 

of offshore tax havens for abusive tax shelters; 

Whereas the Subcommittee has received a number of requests 

from law enforcement officials and regulatory agencies 

for access to records of the Subcommittee’s investigation; 

Whereas, by the privileges of the Senate of the United States 

and rule XI of the Standing Rules of the Senate, no evidence under the control or in the possession of the Senate can, by administrative or judicial process, be taken 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
2 

SRES 555 ATS 

from such control or possession but by permission of the 

Senate; and 

Whereas, when it appears that evidence under the control or 

in the possession of the Senate is needed for the promotion of justice, the Senate will take such action as will 

promote the ends of justice consistent with the privileges 

of the Senate: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Chairman and Ranking Minority 

2 Member of the Permanent Subcommittee on Investiga3 tions of the Committee on Homeland Security and Govern4 mental Affairs, acting jointly, are authorized to provide 

5 to law enforcement officials, regulatory agencies, and 

6 other entities or individuals duly authorized by federal, 

7 state, or foreign governments, records of the Subcommit8 tee’s investigation into the use of offshore tax havens for 

9 abusive tax shelters. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
No. 56153.

protest 92518-K (New York).

#### McCormick Steamship Co. *v.*United States,

*378Opinion by

Johnson, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protest.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

I, Frederick M. Strader, as President and Chief Executive Officer ofUnited Industrial Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

a.               the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the U.S.Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”) fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended; and

b.              the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of United Industrial Corporation.
| Date:  | May 9, 2007 |   |   | /s/ FREDERICK M. STRADER              |
|--------|-------------|--------|--------|---------------------------------------|
|   |        |   |   | Frederick M. Strader                  |
|   |        |   |   | President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to United Industrial Corporationand will be retained by United Industrial Corporation and furnished to theSecurities Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Theforegoing certification is being furnished pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350.  It is not being filed for purposesof Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and it is notto be incorporated by reference into any filing of the company, regardless ofany general incorporation language in such filing.

 

----
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 8, 2018

No. 04-17-00640-CR

William Boyd PORTER,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 186th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016CR4455

Honorable Jefferson Moore, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The Appellant’s Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply Brief is GRANTED. The 

appellant’s reply brief is due August 17, 2018.

_________________________________

Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 8th day of August, 2018.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court