alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2015138EN.01003802.xml

| 27.4.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 138/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.4.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 138/38

---

Action brought on 12 February 2015 — European Commission v Hellenic Republic

(Case C-66/15)

(2015/C 138/52)

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: M. Wasmeier and D. Τriantafillou, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Hellenic Republic

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | declare that the Hellenic Republic, by levying the whole amount of the registration tax payable on the registration of a vehicle which is rented or leased by a customer who is a Greek national from a supplier established in another Member State, without taking into consideration the duration of the rental contract or lease contract and the duration of use of the vehicle concerned in the national territory of Greece, has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 56 to 62 TFEU in relation to the freedom to provide services; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that the Hellenic Republic, by levying the whole amount of the registration tax payable on the registration of a vehicle which is rented or leased by a customer who is a Greek national from a supplier established in another Member State, without taking into consideration the duration of the rental contract or lease contract and the duration of use of the vehicle concerned in the national territory of Greece, has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 56 to 62 TFEU in relation to the freedom to provide services;

| — | order the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The Hellenic Republic, by imposing the whole of the registration tax payable on the registration by a supplier established in another Member State of vehicles which are leased or used on a hire-purchase agreement by nationals of Greece, without taking into consideration the duration of the lease (rental) contract and of use in the national territory of Greece, failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 56-62 TFEU.

The imposition of the whole registration tax is disproportionate and hinders the free movement of services (see the case-law of the Court in Cura Anglagen, C-451/99, Coevering, C-242/05, Ilhan, C-42/08, and VAV Autovermietung GmbH, C-91/10).

Cura Anglagen

Coevering

Ilhan

VAV Autovermietung GmbH

---
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsStudy of selected tether applications in space, phase 3, volume 2The results of a Phase 3 study of two Selected Tether Applications in Space (STAIS); deorbit of a Shuttle and launch of an Orbital Transfer Vehicle (OTV), both from the space station using a tether were examined. The study objectives were to: perform a preliminary engineering design, define operational scenarios, develop a common cost model, perform cost benefits analyses, and develop a Work Breakdown Structure (WBS). Key features of the performance analysis were to identify the net increases in effective Shuttle cargo capability if tethers are used to assist in the deorbit of Shuttles and the launching of the OTVs from the space station and to define deployer system designs required to accomplish these tasks. Deployer concepts were designed and discussed. Operational scenarios, including timelines, for both tethered and nontethered Shuttle and OTV operations at the space station were evaluated. A summary discussion of the Selected Tether Applications Cost Model (STACOM) and the results of the cost benefits analysis are presented. Several critical technologies needed to implement tether assisted deployment of payloads are also discussed. Conclusions and recommendations are presented.Document ID19870009160Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateSeptember 1, 1986Subject CategorySpacecraft Design, Testing And PerformanceReport/Patent NumberDPD-665-VOL-2DR-04-VOL-2NASA-CR-178936MCR-86-1346-VOL-2NAS 1.26:178936Accession Number87N18593Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS8-36616Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19870009160.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
No. 46317.

#### Protests 922691-G/87431, etc., of American Shpg. Co. et al. (Chicago, etc.).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the-court dismissed the protests.
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 99



    CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
         RELATING TO A PERIODIC REPORT CONTAINING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------




     I, Robert J. Chaney, Chief Executive Officer, and I, John C. Barney, Chief
Financial Officer, of UGI Utilities, Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation (the
"Company"), hereby certify that:

     (1)  The Company's periodic report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June
          30, 2002 (the "Form 10-Q") fully complies with the requirements of
          Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


                                    *  *  *


CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER                     CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


/s/ Robert J. Chaney                        /s/ John C. Barney
-----------------------                     -----------------------
Robert J. Chaney                            John C. Barney

Date:  August 12, 2002                      Date:  August 12, 2002
02 24:21 p.m 02 16 2010 2023663675 Une OSTW85 310 

ilntttll ~mt£s ~rnQtt WASHINGTON, DC 20610 

February 16) 20 l 0 

Ray LaHood 

Secretary 

U.S, Department ofTransportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenu~ SE 

Washington. DC 20590 

Dear Secretary LaHood, 

We are writing to you regarding new rules being developed to further modify 

pilot flight, duty, and rest limitations. We share YOW" concern for the safety of 

airline passengers and believe that improvements can and should be made by the 

airline carriers. the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA),'and Members of 

Congress that will result in a: higher standard ofairline safety at a lower cost to 

taxpayers. 

That being said, we are concerned that in its haste to implement regulations that 

appear to address safety concems, the FAA may inadvertently and unnecessarily 

put certain carriers out of business and, consequently, weaken future humanitarian 

efforts across the world. 

In recent Senate testimony and other public statements, the Department of 

Transportation and the FedcraJ Aviation Administration continue to stress a 

single, one~size-fits-all approach in the pending regulations. We are concerned 

that non-scheduled carriers will be inappropriately lumped in with scheduled air 

carriers. 

Non-scheduled carriers pla.y a pivotal role in providing humanitarian relief and 

military logistical support because they have the tlexibility to respond to crises 

and other emergencies immediaJeiy, Under current regulations, 14 CFR 121, 

Subpart S, the FAA already differentiates between different types ofcarriers. 

This arrangement has provided non-scheduled air carriers with the ability to 

provide commercial service without any safety compromises. 

Additionally, as you know, Executive Order 12866 requires that the Office of 

Infonnation and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) ensure that "agencies shall design 

regulations in the most cost-effective manner to achieve the regulatory objective," 

We believe that in this c~ distinguishing between different types ofcarriers will 

more fully accomplish this executive mandate and enable non-scheduled carriers 

to remain operational. 

S10-100216-046
022437 p.m 02 16 2010 2/2313 2023663675 line OSTW85 310 

We would appreciate your consideration ofthis matter and request any cost~ 

benefit analysis undertaken in conjunction with this rule, and the final justification 

ofthe promulgated rule in light ofExe(;utive Order 12866. 

Thank you for your service to our great oountry. 

Sincerely, 

S10-100216-046
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **CMBS Department**

 

MAC N9401-011

1055 10th Avenue SE

Minneapolis, MN 55414 |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc. 

1585 BROADWAY

NEW YORK, New York 10036-8200

 

RE: Annual Statement ofCompliance for GS Mortgage Securities Trust 2016-GS2 Commercial MortgagePass-Through Certificates, Series 2016-GS2

 

Per the Pooling and ServicingAgreement dated as of May 1, 2016 (the “Agreement”), theundersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Custodian(“Wells Fargo”), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the yearending December 31, 2016 (the “Reporting Period”):

 

(a) A review of WellsFargo’s activities during the Reporting Period and of its performanceunder the Agreement has been made under such officer’s supervision; and

 

(b) To the best of suchofficer’s knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled allof its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

 

February 27, 2017

 

/s/ Gail Vannest

GAIL VANNEST

Vice President

 

 

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
# C_2017006EN.01001301.xml

| 9.1.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 6/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.1.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 6/13

---

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 9 November 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d’appel de Liège — Belgium) — Sabrina Wathelet v Garage Bietheres & Fils SPRL

(Case C-149/15) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Directive 1999/44/EC - Sale of consumer goods and associated guarantees - Scope - Concept of ‘seller’ - Intermediary - Exceptional circumstances))

(2017/C 006/15)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Referring court

Cour d’appel de Liège

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Sabrina Wathelet

Applicant:

Defendant: Garage Bietheres & Fils SPRL

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The concept of ‘seller’, for the purposes of Article 1(2)(c) of Directive 1999/44/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 May 1999 on certain aspects of the sale of consumer goods and associated guarantees, must be interpreted as covering also a trader acting as intermediary on behalf of a private individual who has not duly informed the consumer of the fact that the owner of the goods sold is a private individual, which it is for the referring court to determine, taking into account all the circumstances of the case. The above interpretation does not depend on whether the intermediary is remunerated for acting as intermediary

---

(1)  OJ C 213, 29.6.2015.

1

---
# C_2016279EN.01002402.xml

| 1.8.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 279/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.8.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 279/24

---

Order of the President of the Eighth of the Court of 11 May 2016 — European Commission v Federal Republic of Germany

(Case C-481/15) (1)

1

(2016/C 279/33)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 371, 9.11.2015.

1

---
# C_2015118EN.01001401.xml

| 13.4.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 118/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.4.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 118/14

---

Application for authorisation to serve an attachment order brought on 9 February 2015 — ANKO AE Antiprosopeion, Emporiou kai Viomichanias v European Commission

(Case C-2/15 SA)

(2015/C 118/18)

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ANKO AE Antiprosopeion, Emporiou kai Viomichanias (represented by: V. Christianos, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | authorise ANKO AE Antiprosopeion, Emporiou kai Viomichanias to effect the attachment of assets of the Commission in Greece, in order to achieve satisfaction of the claim for the amount of EUR 6  752,74, together with interest on late payment calculated from 12.8.2010 until its full and complete payment, at an interest rate of 1 % per annum; |
| --- | --- |

—

authorise ANKO AE Antiprosopeion, Emporiou kai Viomichanias to effect the attachment of assets of the Commission in Greece, in order to achieve satisfaction of the claim for the amount of EUR 6  752,74, together with interest on late payment calculated from 12.8.2010 until its full and complete payment, at an interest rate of 1 % per annum;

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs.

---
Climate Change&You

W h a t y o u

c a n d o at school

Students, educators, 

and school 

administrators can 

all play a key role in 

reducing greenhouse gas 

emissions. 

Resources

EPA’s Climate CHECK Tool: 

www.epa.gov/

climatechange/wycd/

downloads/ClimateCHECK_

1.0.zip

EPA’s Global Warming Wheel 

Card Kit: www.epa.gov/

climatechange/downloads/

ActivityKit.pdf

ENERGY STAR for K-12 School 

Districts: www.energystar.gov/

index.cfm?c=k12_schools.

bus_schoolsk12

EPA’s Reduce, Reuse, and Recycle 

Web site: www.epa.gov/msw/

reduce.htm

EPA’s Climate Change: 

What You Can Do at School 

Web site: www.epa.gov/

climatechange/wycd/school.

html

EPA’s Climate Change Kid’s 

Web site: www.epa.gov/

climatechange/kids/

1. Power down your classroom 

Remember to turn off computers, lights, and other devices that use energy when no one 

is in the classroom. Turning off just one 60-watt incandescent bulb that would otherwise 

burn eight hours a day can save about 1,000 pounds of carbon dioxide over the lifetime 

of the bulb.

2. Learn about climate change science, impacts, and solutions

Explore the many resources available to learn about climate change. Investigate what other 

schools and organizations are doing to educate their audiences on climate change. EPA’s Climate 

Change Web site provides educational resources on the What You Can Do at School page. 

3. Calculate your school’s carbon footprint

Use EPA’s Climate Change Emission Calculator Kit (Climate CHECK) (for high schools) or 

EPA’s Global Warming Wheel Card Kit (for middle schools) to investigate the link between 

everyday actions at your school, greenhouse gas emissions, and climate change. These 

interactive tools help students learn about climate change and how to address it. 

4. Ask your school administrators if your school has earned the 

ENERGY STAR

The least efficient schools use three times more energy than the best energy performers.

By partnering with ENERGY STAR for K-12 program, school districts can serve as 

environmental leaders in their community, become energy efficient, reduce greenhouse gas 

emissions, and save 30 percent or more on energy bills.

5. Reduce, reuse, and recycle

Recycle school or classroom paper, newspapers, beverage containers, electronic 

equipment, and batteries. Reducing, reusing, and recycling at school and in the classroom 

helps conserve energy, minimize pollution, and reduce greenhouse gases. You can reduce, 

reuse, and recycle at school or in the classroom by using twosided printing and copying, buying supplies made with 

recycled content, and recycling used electronics 

and printer cartridges.

Office of Air and Radiation (6207J) 

EPA 430-F-07-007

www.epa.gov 

June 2007 

Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on Recycled Paper

(Minimum 50% Postconsumer) 

Process Chlorine Free
**Exhibit 34.14**

**Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

To the Board of Directors 

Situs Holdings, LLC 

We have examined management’s assertion, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Assessment of Compliance with Applicable Regulation ABServicing Criteria (Management’s Assertion), that Situs Holdings, LLC (the Company) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Items 1122(d)(3)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(vii) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) Regulation AB(the applicable servicing criteria) for services by the Company that are encompassed by contractual obligations to perform Regulation AB reporting for the Operating or Trust Advisor Services Platform (the “Platform”), including only thoseasset-backed securities transactions defined below, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2017. Appendix B to management’s assertion identifies the individual asset-backed transactions defined by management as constituting thePlatform. Management is responsible for Situs Holdings, LLC’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assertion about the Company’s compliance with the applicableservicing criteria based on our examination. 

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards of the Public Company AccountingOversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria, including tests on a sample basis of the servicing activities related to thePlatform, determining whether the Company performed those activities in compliance with the servicing criteria during the specified period and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our procedures werelimited to selected servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report and, accordingly, such samples may not have included servicing activities related to each asset-backed transaction in the Platform. Further,an examination is not designed to detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred prior to the period specified above that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered bythis report. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria. 

In our opinion, management’s assertion that Situs Holdings, LLC complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the yearended December 31, 2017, for the Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects. 

/s/ RSM US LLP 

Duluth, Minnesota 

February 28, 2018 

 
1
|   | **EXHIBIT                31.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY                ACT** |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                     |                                                                      |                                           |
|------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------|
|                                     | **UNITED                  MORTGAGE TRUST**                                |
|                                |                                                                 |                                      |
| Date: May                  15, 2007 | By                                                              | /s/ Christine                  A. Griffin |
|                                     | *President                  and Chief Executive                  Officer* |

----
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, John C. Lawrence, President, and Chief Executive Officer of United States Antimony Corporation (the "Company") do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:





This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






Date:John C. LawrencePresident and Chief Executive Officer





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Daniel L. Parks, Chief Financial Officer of United States Antimony Corporation (the "Company") do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:





This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date:Daniel L. ParksChief Financial Officer
No. 65704.

#### Pastene & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 59/852 (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the total weight of the olive oil contents and the containers was 33,670 pounds, the collector was directed to reliquidate the entry accordingly.