alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management 

          - [MT-020-1010-PO] 

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior, Montana, Billings and Miles City Field Offices. 

# ACTION:

Notice of public meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with the Federal Land Policy and Management Act (FLPMA) and the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972 (FACA), the U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Eastern Montana Resource Advisory Council (RAC), will meet as indicated below. 

# DATES:

The meetings will be held May 30 and 31, 2007 in Miles City, MT with each day beginning at 8 a.m. The meetings will adjourn at approximately 3:30 p.m. each day. The public comment period will be at approximately 11 a.m. on the 31st. When determined, the meeting place will be announced in a news release. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mark Jacobsen, Public Affairs Specialist, Miles City Field Office, 111 Garryowen Road, Miles City, Montana 59301. Telephone: (406) 233-2831. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The 15-member Council advises the Secretary of the Interior, through the Bureau of Land Management, on a variety of planning and management issues associated with public land management in Montana. At this meeting, topics to discuss include: 

Field Manager Updates, 

The Miles City Field Office and Billings Field Office Updates, 

Subcommittee updates and working sessions, 

—and other topics the council may raise. 

All meetings are open to the public. The public may present written comments to the Council. Each formal Council meeting will also have time allocated for hearing public comments. Depending on the number of persons wishing to comment and time available, the time for individual oral comments may be limited. Individuals who plan to attend and need special assistance, such as sign language interpretation, tour transportation or other reasonable accommodations, should contact the BLM as provided above. 

Dated: April 16, 2007. 

M. Elaine Raper, 

Field Manager.

 [FR Doc. E7-7632 Filed 4-20-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-$$-P
wow

No 6-2

WITH SUPPLEMENTARY S METER . CONTOURS BLYING SOUND, ALASKA ?

PAFOGNAK

DATUM IS MEAN LOWER LOW WATER #437 ie

BATHYMETRIC CONTOUR INTERVAL: 10 METERS. | Le Sf

a a — BLYING SO wo6-/

| HABINNN ONIM HO

HAgINNN ONIAAVEO

eee ose s/

SNIAAVHG |

HASIION
Aris Industries, Inc. Certification under Section 906 of the Sarbanes/Oxley Act
- Filed as an Exhibit to 10-Q for the Quarter Ended September 30, 2003


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of Aris Industries, Inc. (the "Company"), does hereby
certify, to such officer's knowledge, That:


(1)      The Company's Quarterly Report of Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
         September 30, 2003 ("Report") fully complies with the requirements of
         section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.




By /s/ Arnold H. Simon
-------------------------
Arnold H. Simon
Chief Executive Officer
November 13, 2003


By /s/ Paul Spector
-------------------------
Paul Spector
Chief Financial Officer
November 13, 2003
EXHIBIT 32.1
------------

                              UNITED-GUARDIAN, INC.
                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of  United-Guardian,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the quarter  ended  September  30, 2006, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, Alfred R. Globus,  Chief  Executive  Officer of the Company,  hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

        (1) the Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2) the  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


Date:  November 5, 2006                  /s/ Alfred R. Globus
                                         --------------------------
                                         Alfred R. Globus
                                         Chief Executive Officer
U.S. Geological   Survey   Geologic Investigations Series I-2674

**Map   of Major Lithologic Units in the Pacific Northwest: A Contribution to the Interior   Columbia Basin Ecosystem Management Project**

*By*

**Bruce   R. Johnson and Gary L. Raines**

| **INTRODUCTION**

This         report is one in a series of digital maps, data files, and reports generated         by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) to provide geologic process and mineral         resource information for the Interior Columbia Basin Ecosystem Management         Project, a U.S. Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management interagency         project. The various digital maps and data files that were provided by         the USGS are being used in a geographic information system (GIS)-based         ecosystem assessment that includes a comprehensive analysis of past, present,         and future ecosystem conditions within the general area of the Columbia         River Basin east of the Cascade Mountains. |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

Download a PDF   version of the map for viewing (28 MB)

Download a PostScript   version of this map for plotting (65.3 MB)Note: This map is approximately 48 inches wide by 36 inches high.

Download the 11-page pamphlet   that accompanies this map as a PDF file (612 KB) 

To download the digital   database for this project, see USGS Open File Report 95-680

Download a free   copy of Adobe Acrobat Reader

For questions about the   content of this report, contact Bruce Johnson

This map   is also available from:

USGS Information   Services, Box 25286,   Federal Center, Denver, CO 80225  telephone: 303-202-4210; e-mail: infoservices@usgs.gov

----

URL of this page:   https://pubs.usgs.gov/imap/i2674/  Maintained by: Michael Diggles  Created: August 24, 2001  Last modified: June 23, 2005 (mfd)

| Privacy   Statement | Disclaimer   | Accessibility |

| Department   of the Interior | U.S. Geological Survey   | Geologic Division | Mineral   Resources Team |
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-40186

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JOSE GONZALEZ-GARZA,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:07-CR-541-1

Before GARZA, DENNIS, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Jose Gonzalez-Garza raises

arguments that are foreclosed by United States v. Betancourt, 586 F.3d 303, 308-

09 (5th Cir. 2009), which reaffirmed the holding in United States v. GamezGonzalez, 319 F.3d 695, 700 (5th Cir. 2003), that knowledge of drug type and

quantity is not a material element of the offense. The Government’s motion for

summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

February 12, 2010

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

Case: 09-40186 Document: 00511027598 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/12/2010
# Official Journal L 143/2018

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 143 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 617 June 2018 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 143

English edition

Legislation

Volume 617 June 2018

---

| Contents | | I   Legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Regulation (EU) 2018/825 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2018 amending Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Union and Regulation (EU) 2016/1037 on protection against subsidised imports from countries not members of the European Union | 1 |

Contents

I   Legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Regulation (EU) 2018/825 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2018 amending Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Union and Regulation (EU) 2016/1037 on protection against subsidised imports from countries not members of the European Union

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
# C_2017063EN.01000202.xml

| 27.2.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 63/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.2.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 63/2

---

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 11 January 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Krajský súd v Prešove — Slovakia) — Criminal proceedings against Joszef Grundza

(Case C-289/15) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Judicial cooperation in criminal matters - Framework Decision 2008/909/JHA - Article 7 - Condition of double criminality - Article 9 - Ground for non-recognition and non-enforcement based on the lack of double criminality - National of the executing State convicted in the issuing State for failure to comply with a decision issued by a public authority))

(2017/C 063/03)

Language of the case: Slovak

Referring court

Referring court

Krajský súd v Prešove

Party in the main proceedings

Party in the main proceedings

Joszef Grundza

Intervening party: Krajská prokuratúra Prešov

Intervening party:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 7(3) and Article 9(1)(d) of Council Framework Decision 2008/909/JHA of 27 November 2008 on the application of the principle of mutual recognition to judgments in criminal matters imposing custodial sentences or measures involving deprivation of liberty for the purpose of their enforcement in the European Union, as amended by Council Framework Decision 2009/299/JHA of 26 February 2009, must be interpreted as meaning that the condition of double criminality must be considered to be met, in a situation such as that in the main proceedings, where the factual elements underlying the offence, as reflected in the judgment handed down by the competent authority of the issuing State, would also, per se, be subject to a criminal sanction in the territory of the executing State if they were present in that State.

---

(1)  OJ C 294, 7.9.2015.

1

---
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 603 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 603

   Designating Thursday, November 16, 2006, as ``Feed America Day''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

           September 30 (legislative day, September 29), 2006

    Mr. Hatch (for himself and Mr. Bennett) submitted the following 
    resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

                           November 16, 2006

             Committee discharged; considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

   Designating Thursday, November 16, 2006, as ``Feed America Day''.

Whereas Thanksgiving Day celebrates the spirit of selfless giving and an 
        appreciation for family and friends;
Whereas the spirit of Thanksgiving Day is a virtue upon which the United States 
        was founded;
Whereas, in 2006, great numbers of citizens of the United States continue to 
        suffer hunger and other privations; and
Whereas selfless sacrifice breeds a genuine spirit of Thanksgiving, both 
        affirming and restoring the fundamental principles of the society of the 
        United States: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) designates Thursday, November 16, 2006, as ``Feed 
        America Day''; and
            (2) calls upon the people of the United States--
                    (A) to sacrifice 2 meals on Thursday, November 16, 
                2006; and
                    (B) to donate to a religious or charitable 
                organization of their choice the money that they would 
                have spent on food for that day for the purpose of 
                feeding the hungry.
                                 <all>
```
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER ON M OTION FOR R EHEARING

Appellate case name: Victor S. Elgohary, Representatively on behalf of Nominal Defendant

Lakes on Eldridge North Community Association, Inc. V. Lakes on

Eldri dge North Community Association, Inc.; RealManage, LLC;

Darla Kitchen; Don Byrnes; Michael Ecklund; Laura Vasallo Lee;

John Kane; Julie Ann Bennett; Rick Hawthorne; Cara Davis; Christi

Keller; Jim Flanary; Jill Richardson

Appellate case number: 01

- 14

- 0021 6

- CV

Trial court case number: 2013

- 17221

Trial court: 234th District Court of Harris County

Date motion filed: 2/1/16

Party filing motion: Appellants

It is ordered that the motion for rehearing is DENIED GRANTED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Sherry Radack

Acting Individua lly Acting for the Court

Panel consists of: Chief Justice Radack and Justices Bland and Huddle.

Date: August 16, 2016
The record reflects that A.C., Jr. is the biological child of a different father, A.C.,

1

whose parental rights were also terminated during the same proceeding, but who did not

appeal the termination order. 

NO. 07-09-0133-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL C

JULY 9, 2009

______________________________

IN THE INTEREST OF A.G., A.G., AND A.C., JR. CHILDREN

_________________________________

FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF RANDALL COUNTY;

NO. 6014-L2; HONORABLE RONALD WALKER, JR., JUDGE

_______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, G.G., filed this appeal to challenge the trial court’s order terminating his

parental rights to his children A.G. and A.G. Pending before this Court is G.G.’s 1

unopposed Notice of Dismissal of Appeal in which he expresses his desire to dismiss this

appeal. Without passing on the merits of the case, G.G.’s motion is granted and the
2

appeal is dismissed. Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1). Having dismissed the appeal at G.G.’s

request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained and our mandate will issue forthwith.

Patrick A. Pirtle

 Justice
# C_2015221EN.01000501.xml

| 6.7.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 221/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.7.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 221/5

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Kammarrätten i Stockholm (Sweden) lodged on 4 May 2015 — Tele2 Sverige AB v Post- och telestyrelsen

(Case C-203/15)

(2015/C 221/06)

Language of the case: Swedish

Referring court

Referring court

Kammarrätten i Stockholm

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Tele2 Sverige AB

Applicant:

Defendant: Post- och telestyrelsen

Defendant:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1) | Is a general obligation to retain traffic data covering all persons, all means of electronic communication and all traffic data without any distinctions, limitations or exceptions for the purpose of combating crime (as described [below under points 1-6]) compatible with Article 15(1) of Directive 2002/58/EC (1), taking account of Articles 7, 8 and 15(1) of the Charter? |
| --- | --- |

1)

Is a general obligation to retain traffic data covering all persons, all means of electronic communication and all traffic data without any distinctions, limitations or exceptions for the purpose of combating crime (as described [below under points 1-6]) compatible with Article 15(1) of Directive 2002/58/EC (1), taking account of Articles 7, 8 and 15(1) of the Charter?

1

| 2) | If the answer to question 1 is in the negative, may the retention nevertheless be permitted where:






  a) | access by the national authorities to the retained data is determined as [described below under paragraphs 7-24], and |
| --- | --- | --- |

2)

If the answer to question 1 is in the negative, may the retention nevertheless be permitted where:

a)

access by the national authorities to the retained data is determined as [described below under paragraphs 7-24], and

| b) | security requirements are regulated as [described below under paragraphs 26-31], and |
| --- | --- |

b)

security requirements are regulated as [described below under paragraphs 26-31], and

| c) | all relevant data are to be retained for six months, calculated as from the day the communication is ended, and subsequently deleted as [described below under paragraphs 25]? |
| --- | --- |

c)

all relevant data are to be retained for six months, calculated as from the day the communication is ended, and subsequently deleted as [described below under paragraphs 25]?

---

(1)  Directive 2002/58/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 July 2002 concerning the processing of personal data and the protection of privacy in the electronic communications sector (Directive on privacy and electronic communications) (OJ 2002 L 201, p. 37).

1

---
#### Koscherak Bros., Inc., et al. *v.*United States

No. 6725.

Entry No. 713080, etc.

Invoices dated Stoke on Trent, England, August 1945, etc.

Certified September 1945, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., September 27, 1945, etc.

(Decided January 8, 1947)

*Siegel, Mandell & Davidson*for the plaintiffs.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Keefe, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement -fisted in schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importers on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
124 STAT. 3556 PUBLIC LAW 111–326—DEC. 22, 2010 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 5591: 

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 111–611 (Comm. on Transportation and Infrastructure). 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 156 (2010): 

Sept. 28, considered and passed House. 

Dec. 9, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 111–326 

111th Congress 

An Act 

To designate the airport traffic control tower located at Spokane International 

Airport in Spokane, Washington, as the ‘‘Ray Daves Airport Traffic Control Tower’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

The airport traffic control tower located at Spokane International Airport in Spokane, Washington, and any successor airport 

traffic control tower at that location, shall be known and designated 

as the ‘‘Ray Daves Airport Traffic Control Tower’’. 

SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, 

or other record of the United States to the airport traffic control 

tower referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Ray Daves Airport Traffic Control Tower’’. 

Approved December 22, 2010. 

Dec. 22, 2010 

[H.R. 5591] 


ccoleman on DSK8P6SHH1PROD with PUBLIC LAWS
# C_2015354EN.01002801.xml

| 26.10.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 354/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 354/28

---

Order of the President of the Court of 8 July 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Hannover — Germany) — Michael Ihden, Gisela Brinkmann v TUIfly GmbH

(Case C-257/15) (1)

1

(2015/C 354/30)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 279, 24.8.2015.

1

---