alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 123 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 16, 2007 

Received 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the District 

of Columbia Special Olympics Law Enforcement Torch Run. 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), 

3 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF USE OF CAPITOL 

4 GROUNDS FOR D.C. SPECIAL OLYMPICS LAW 

5 ENFORCEMENT TORCH RUN. 

6 On June 8, 2007, or on such other date as the Speak7 er of the House of Representatives and the Committee on 

8 Rules and Administration of the Senate may jointly desVerDate Aug 31 2005 03:08 May 17, 2007 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\HC123.RDS HC123

cprice-sewell on PRODPC74 with BILLS
2 

HCON 123 RDS 

1 ignate, the 2007 District of Columbia Special Olympics 

2 Law Enforcement Torch Run (in this resolution referred 

3 to as the ‘‘event’’) may be run through the Capitol 

4 Grounds as part of the journey of the Special Olympics 

5 torch to the District of Columbia Special Olympics sum6 mer games. 

7 SEC. 2. RESPONSIBILITY OF CAPITOL POLICE BOARD. 

8 The Capitol Police Board shall take such actions as 

9 may be necessary to carry out the event. 

10 SEC. 3. CONDITIONS RELATING TO PHYSICAL PREPARA11 TIONS. 

12 The Architect of the Capitol may prescribe conditions 

13 for physical preparations for the event. 

14 SEC. 4. ENFORCEMENT OF RESTRICTIONS. 

15 The Capitol Police Board shall provide for enforce16 ment of the restrictions contained in section 5104(c) of 

17 title 40, United States Code, concerning sales, advertise18 ments, displays, and solicitations on the Capitol Grounds, 


cprice-sewell on PRODPC74 with BILLS
3 

HCON 123 RDS 

1 as well as other restrictions applicable to the Capitol 

2 Grounds, in connection with the event. 

Passed the House of Representatives May 15, 2007. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 


cprice-sewell on PRODPC74 with BILLS
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

____________________

No. 98-20583

Summary Calendar

____________________

WAYNE T. ZIEGLER,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

BANK OF AMERICA NATIONAL TRUST & SAVINGS ASSOCIATION,

Defendant-Appellee.

________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

(H-97-CV-1492)

_________________________________________________________________

May 25, 1999

Before KING, Chief Judge, POLITZ and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Wayne T. Ziegler appeals from the district court’s order

granting the Bank of America’s (Bank) motion to dismiss his

diversity complaint on the res judicata grounds.

Ziegler has filed several lawsuits in California state courts

containing allegations that are almost identical to those raised in

his complaint in federal district court in Texas. To varying

degrees, the instant lawsuit and the California complaints all
2

allege that in the 1980s the Bank fraudulently depleted accounts

that Ziegler maintained with the Bank at various California

branches and that Bank employees sank his sailboat over

disagreements about a loan Ziegler had with the Bank. The instant

complaint, like some of Ziegler’s California actions, also alleges

that Ziegler’s sour relationship with the Bank dates to his

childhood in the 1950s, when mental-health employees, apparently in

a conspiracy with the Bank, kidnapped a pet collie belonging to the

then-seven-year-old Ziegler because Ziegler had publicly supported

a mental patient who had allegedly been victimized by the Bank’s

loan practices.

This court can affirm the district court’s dismissal on any

ground fairly supported by the record. See Nagle v. Lee, 807 F.2d

435, 439 (5th Cir. 1987).

The district court’s jurisdiction in this case was based on

diversity of citizenship; we therefore must apply Texas law,

including Texas statutes of limitations. See Vincent v. A.C. & S.,

Inc., 833 F.2d 553, 555 (5th Cir. 1987). Under Texas law, the

statute of limitations is a procedural issue that is governed by

the law of the state in which the claim is brought, in this case,

Texas. See Hill v. Perel, 923 S.W.2d 636, 639 (Tex. App.--Houston

[1st Dist.] 1995, no writ); Los Angeles Airways, Inc. v. Lummis,

603 S.W.2d 246, 248 (Tex. Civ. App.--Houston [14th Dist.] 1980).

From the face of Ziegler’s complaint it is clear that he had

knowledge of the underlying facts giving rise to his claims in

1993. Thus, the statute of limitations has expired on each claim
3

under Texas law. See TEX CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 16.003 (setting

forth two-year statute of limitations for claims based on fraud and

taking of personal property of another). The district court’s

judgment is AFFIRMED. Ziegler’s motion “to take judicial notice of

applicable California statutes and cases” is DENIED as unnecessary.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 135 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 135

  Recognizing Pennsylvania hunters for their continued commitment to 
       safety and for setting a new State safety record in 2006.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 1, 2007

Mr. Carney (for himself, Mr. Dent, Mr. Gerlach, Mr. Holden, Mr. Murtha, 
 Mr. Patrick J. Murphy of Pennsylvania, Mr. Altmire, Mr. Shuster, and 
Mr. Kanjorski) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
      referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
  Recognizing Pennsylvania hunters for their continued commitment to 
       safety and for setting a new State safety record in 2006.

Whereas in 2006 Pennsylvania hunters set a new State safety record;
Whereas Pennsylvania hunters continue year after year to improve their safety 
        record;
Whereas much of the success of this safety record can be contributed to hunter 
        education training and the role of responsible hunters in the field;
Whereas volunteer hunter education instructors have also greatly contributed to 
        the safety of hunters; and
Whereas hunters are the vital link in preserving and maintaining the great 
        natural resources in Pennsylvania, including wild places: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),  
That the Congress recognizes Pennsylvania hunters for their continued 
commitment to safety and for setting a new State safety record in 2006.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         I, Gordon R. Arnold,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as
adopted  pursuant to Section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that the
quarterly report of Sierra Monitor  Corporation on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly
period ended June 30, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 and that information  contained
in such quarterly report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects
the financial condition and results of operations of Sierra Monitor Corporation.

         A signed original of this written statement required by section 906 has
been  provided  to Sierra  Monitor  Corporation  and will be  retained by Sierra
Monitor  Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange  Commission or
its staff upon request.

Date:        August 8, 2003                By:    /s/ Gordon R. Arnold
                                                  --------------------
                                                  Gordon R. Arnold
                                                  Chief Executive Officer
                                                  Chief Financial Officer




                                                                   Page 17 of 17
Before the First Division,

November 1, 1945

No. 50644.

#### Petition 6509-R of Robert McBratney *&*Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Cole, J.

The undisputed testimony established that prior to entry the assistant appraiser was consulted for information concerning the proper value of the merchandise; that the appraiser’s suggested value-was accepted, and original entry was made; that later, after conferring with other New York importers of similar goods, petitioner concluded that the price supplied by the appraiser was based on merchandise superior in quality than the shipment in question; and that the original entered value was lowered by proper amendment to pétitionor’s United States ceiling price which the appraiser advanced to meet his higher value previously quoted. The court held that the entry of the merchandise at a less value than the final appraised value was without any intention to defraud the revenue of the United States or to conceal or to misrepresent the facts of the case or to deceive'the appraiser as to the value of the merchandise. The petition was therefore granted.
cm 1 

c:lpel_datalspectralethox 4180 .sp 

84.1 

80 

75 

70 

65 

60 

55 

50 

45 

%T 40 

35 

30 

25 

20 

15 

10 

5 

0.2 

4000.0 3000 2000 1500 1000 450.0
Before the First Division,

April 27, 1944

No. 49382.

#### Protest 107913-K of 21 Brands, Inc. (New York).

*302Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

At the trial the collector’s report and documents were admitted in evidence without objection of the Government. As these bottles were withdrawn from warehouse on or subsequent to the effective date of said Mexican Trade Agreement certain of the merchandise in question was held dutiable at 8% cents per gross as claimed and as set forth in decision herein.
III 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 616 

Authorizing the Majority Leader and one staff member to travel to Mexico 

for the inauguration of the new President of Mexico scheduled for December 2, 2006. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 16, 2006 

Mr. FRIST submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 

agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Authorizing the Majority Leader and one staff member to 

travel to Mexico for the inauguration of the new President of Mexico scheduled for December 2, 2006. 

1 Resolved, That the Majority Leader and one staff 

2 member are authorized to travel to Mexico for the inau3 guration of the new President of Mexico scheduled for De4 cember 2, 2006. 

Æ 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 80 (Thursday, April 26, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 20757]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-7971]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

48 CFR Chapter 44

[Docket ID FEMA-2006-0033]
RIN 1660-AA46


Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Acquisition Regulation 
System; Removal of Chapter 44

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Direct final rule; confirmation of effective date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) published a 
direct final rule that notified the public of its intent to remove the 
FEMA Acquisition Regulation in its entirety. FEMA did not receive any 
comments on the rule. Therefore, the rule will go into effect as 
scheduled.

DATES: The effective date of the direct final rule published March 2, 
2007 (72 FR 9445) is confirmed as May 1, 2007.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joyce M. Ard, Federal Emergency 
Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., Patriot Plaza Room 201, 
Washington DC, 20472, (phone) 202-646-3213, (facsimile) 202-646-2928, 
or (e-mail) <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#cfa5a0b6acaae1aebdab8faba7bce1a8a0b9"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a8c2c7d1cbcd86c9dacce8ccc0db86cfc7de">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On March 2, 2007, FEMA published a direct 
final rule at 72 FR 9445 that notified the public of FEMA's intent to 
remove the FEMA Acquisition Regulation (FEMAAR) at 48 CFR Chapter 44 in 
its entirety. The specific language and subsequent clauses are removed 
as a result of the transfer of FEMA to the Department of Homeland 
Security (DHS) on March 1, 2003. The Homeland Security Acquisition 
Regulation (HSAR) created a department-wide acquisition regulation for 
DHS in 48 CFR Chapter 30, and included FEMA in the list of entities for 
which the chapter applied, thereby superseding and making 48 CFR 
Chapter 44 duplicative and unnecessary. FEMA has not received an 
adverse comment, or notice of intent to submit an adverse comment, on 
this rule. Therefore, the rule will go into effect as scheduled.

    Dated: April 19, 2007.
R. David Paulison,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Department of 
Homeland Security.
 [FR Doc. E7-7971 Filed 4-25-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-49-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 11.1

                                            SIERRA MONITOR CORPORATION
<TABLE>

                                        NET EARNINGS PER SHARE COMPUTATIONS

                                                    (unaudited)

<CAPTION>


                                                                       (All amounts in thousands except per share data)
                                          
                                                                    Three Months Ended                   Nine Months Ended
                                          
                                                              September 30,     September 30,     September 30,     September 30,
                                                              -------------     -------------     -------------     -------------
                                                                  1996              1995              1996              1995
                       

<S>                                                               <C>              <C>              <C>              <C>   
Weighted average shares outstanding
          Common Stock                                            10,332           10,277           10,311           10,262

          Common Stock equivalents -

                options and warrants                                 378              160              379              202
                                                                  ------           ------           ------           ------

          Total weighted average shares

                outstanding                                       10,710           10,437           10,690           10,464
                                                                  ======           ======           ======           ======

Net income                                                        $ 80.6           $ 85.6           $100.5           $ 69.1
                                                                  ======           ======           ======           ======

Net income per share                                              $ 0.01           $ 0.01           $ 0.01           $ 0.01
                                                                  ======           ======           ======           ======
</TABLE>
# Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas

September 16, 2016

No. 04

- 16

- 00390

- CV

Juan ROBLES

, Appellant

v.

Maria Milag ros ROBLES

, Appellee

From the 25th Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas

Trial Court No. 10

- 2084

- CV Honorable W.C. Kirkendall, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Phyllis Bush's notification of late reporter's record is hereby GRANTED. The reporter's record is due on or before October 17, 2016.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said
court on this 16th day of September, 2016

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle
Clerk of Court
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of United Air Lines, Inc.

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350

(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

Each undersigned officer certifies that to the best of his/her knowledge based on a review of the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the
period ended March 31, 2010 of United Air Lines, Inc. (the Report):



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of United Air Lines, Inc.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: April 27, 2010



|                            
|----------------------------
|/s/ Glenn F. Tilton         
|Glenn F. Tilton             
|Chairman and                
|Chief Executive Officer     
|                            
|/s/ Kathryn A. Mikells      
|Kathryn A. Mikells          
|Executive Vice President and
|Chief Financial Officer
No. 48714.

#### Protests 931458-G, etc., of Italian Cheese Co., Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and the cited cases the following allowances were made by the court to compensate for the weight of the foreign substances on the outside of certain cheese: (1) 2)4 percent for cheese similar to that involved in *Scaramelli*v. *United States*(9 Cust. Ct. 270, C. D. 706) and Abstract 42146; and (2) 1 percent for cheese similar to the Reggiano cheese the subject of *Scaramelli*v. *United States, supra.*Protests sustained to this extent.
No. 46316.

#### Protest 797552-G of Edward L. Eyre & Co. (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

When the case was called for trial there was no appear-, anee on the part of the plaintiffs. There being nothing in the record to overcome the presumption of correctness attaching to the collector’s action, the protest was overruled.
July 23 , 2015

D erick Seaton

P.O. Box 57

Savannah, TN 38372

Dear Mr. Seaton :

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not process your

request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can No t Process Your Request

We entered your May 11

, 2015 exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA

- 20 15

-

1554 ), but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does

no t comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request

any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, h ow it would

benefit the public as a whole.

 Any additional i nformation, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do No t Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you

further. If you have any ques tions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267

- 9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

B rittany Newton

Program Analyst , Airmen and

Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Independence Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Roy T. K. Thung, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:   (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.    /s/   Roy T. K. Thung
Chief Executive Officer and President
Date: November 9, 2010   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.    1