alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                  5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
COMPANY'S  FORM 10-Q FOR THE THREE  MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                           1000
       
<S>                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>              3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                      DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                         JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                           MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                                   2,420,765
<SECURITIES>                                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            4,656,080
<ALLOWANCES>                                                99,797
<INVENTORY>                                              1,416,813
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         8,888,457
<PP&E>                                                   5,502,321
<DEPRECIATION>                                           1,685,405
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                          13,876,706
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    3,891,096
<BONDS>                                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                            0
<PREFERRED>                                                      0
<COMMON>                                                     9,415
<OTHER-SE>                                               8,176,195
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                            13,876,706
<SALES>                                                    833,239
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         2,405,162
<CGS>                                                      662,891
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            2,363,230
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                          49,785
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                             30,177
<INCOME-TAX>                                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                         30,177
<DISCONTINUED>                                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                  0
<CHANGES>                                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                                30,177
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                 0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                 0.00
        

</TABLE>
# C_2017144EN.01000901.xml

| 8.5.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 144/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.5.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 144/9

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 9 March 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Općinski sud u Puli-Pola -Croatia) — Pula Parking d.o.o. v Sven Klaus Tederahn

(Case C-551/15) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Judicial cooperation in civil matters - Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 - Temporal and material scope - Civil and commercial matters - Enforcement proceedings relating to the recovery of an unpaid public parking debt - Included - Concept of ‘court’ - Notary who has issued a writ of execution based on an ‘authentic document’))

(2017/C 144/11)

Language of the case: Croatian

Referring court

Referring court

Općinski sud u Puli-Pola

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Pula Parking d.o.o.

Applicant:

Defendant: Sven Klaus Tederahn

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

| 1. | Article 1(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2012 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters must be interpreted as meaning that enforcement proceedings brought by a company owned by a local authority against a natural person domiciled in another Member State, for the purposes of recovering an unpaid debt for parking in a public car park, the operation of which has been delegated to that company by that authority, which are not in any way punitive but merely constitute consideration for a service provided, fall within the scope of that regulation. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Article 1(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2012 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters must be interpreted as meaning that enforcement proceedings brought by a company owned by a local authority against a natural person domiciled in another Member State, for the purposes of recovering an unpaid debt for parking in a public car park, the operation of which has been delegated to that company by that authority, which are not in any way punitive but merely constitute consideration for a service provided, fall within the scope of that regulation.

| 2. | Regulation No 1215/2012 must be interpreted as meaning that, in Croatia, notaries, acting within the framework of the powers conferred on them by national law in enforcement proceedings based on an ‘authentic document’, do not fall within the concept of ‘court’ within the meaning of that regulation. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Regulation No 1215/2012 must be interpreted as meaning that, in Croatia, notaries, acting within the framework of the powers conferred on them by national law in enforcement proceedings based on an ‘authentic document’, do not fall within the concept of ‘court’ within the meaning of that regulation.

---

(1)  OJ C 48, 8.2.2016.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                           UT
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1998
<BOOK-VALUE>                                   PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      1,242,371
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                    34,350
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         170,973
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                       341,254
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,788,948
<COMMON>                                       281,321
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      (274)
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            156,420
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 437,467
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    4,299
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           564,630
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                             0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                      118,825
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                 0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                  74,574
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                      0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                    16,683
<LEASES-CURRENT>                               344
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 572,126
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  1,788,948
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      322,266
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                           22,680
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     255,735
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     278,415
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        43,851
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                             (940)
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 42,911
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       26,046
<NET-INCOME>                                   14,459
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                    101
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                  14,379
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                       20,185
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                      39,718
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         35,012
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  1.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  1.03
        

</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

DOUGLAS G. HAVENS, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. Case No.: 2:12-cv-637

JUDGE GEORGE C. SMITH

Magistrate Judge Kemp

COMMISSIONER OF 

SOCIAL SECURITY, 

 

Defendant. 

ORDER

This case is before the Court to consider a Report and Recommendation issued by the

Magistrate Judge on October 16, 2014. The time for filing objections has passed, and no

objections have been filed to the Report and Recommendation. Therefore, the Court ADOPTS

the Report and Recommendation. Plaintiff’s Motion for Attorney’s Fees under the Social

Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), is granted in substantial part. 

The Clerk shall remove Documents 21 and 24 from the Court’s pending motions list.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 /s/ George C. Smith 

 GEORGE C. SMITH, JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case: 2:12-cv-00637-GCS-TPK Doc #: 25 Filed: 11/20/14 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v ROBERT G. WESTBERG, Storekeeper Third Class, U. S. Navy, Appellant

18 USCMA 583, 40 CMR 295

No. 22,140

September 19, 1969

*Captain Frank A. Nelson,*JAGC, USN, was on the pleadings for Appellant, Accused.

*Colonel C. R. Larouche,*USMC, was on the pleadings for Appellee, United States.

Opinion of the Court

Darden, Judge:

The accused has pleaded guilty to a single specification of absence without leave, set forth as a violation of Article 86, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 886. The inquiry into the providence of the plea is comparable to that found in United States v Care, 18 USCMA 535, 40 CMR 247. Furthermore, the accused shows the providence of his plea by acknowledging in mitigation that he had committed the offense charged and by explaining the reasons behind his unlawful act. We find the plea of guilty provident. However, the procedure followed in this *584case would not meet the standard that must apply to cases tried thirty days ^fter the decision ".in United States v Care, supra.

The decision of the board of review is affirmed.

Chief Judge Quinn concurs.

Ferguson, Judge:

I concur in the result. See my dissent in United States v Care,. 18 USCMA 535, 40 CMR 247.
Exhibit 10.4


 


SECURED PROMISSORY NOTE AMENDMENT AND EXTENSION
AGREEMENT


 


This Secured Promissory Note Amendment and Extension
Agreement (the “Agreement”) is entered into by JDone LLC, a Colorado limited liability company (the “Borrower”)
and Thomas S. Yang (the “Holder”), as of January 25, 2022 and effective as of January 15, 2022.


 


Reference is made to that certain original Secured
Promissory Note between the Borrower and the Holder, dated as of September 15, 2014 and amended on October 1, 2019, together with all
amendments thereto (the “Note”), together with all associated notes, pledge agreements, guaranties, deeds of trust, security
agreements, affidavits and other instruments and documents executed and delivered by the Borrower, the Holder and any Guarantors (the
“Loan Documents”). Each of the Loan Documents shall be deemed to be amended in connection with the terms of this Agreement
and the terms of this Agreement and the Note, as amended and extended hereby, shall be the controlling document with respect to the Note
and the Loan Documents.


 


All capitalized terms used herein, but not otherwise
defined, shall have the meaning ascribed to such terms in the Note and the Loan Documents.


 


At the execution of this Agreement, the Borrower
shall undertake the following, and the Note shall be amended as follows:


 


		(i)	The Holder and Borrower agree that the outstanding principal balance under the Note is currently $501,184.92;
	 	 	 



		(ii)	the Borrower shall pay an extension fee of $1,000 each month on February 15, 2022, March 15, 2022 and April 15, 2022 thereby amending
the term of the Note (as described in (iii) below);
	 	 	 



		(iii)	the Note shall be amended to change the Maturity Date to April 15, 2022;
	 	 	 



		(iv)	the Borrower will pay principal and interest payments of $5,500.00 on or about
	 	 	 



 


February 15, 2022, March 15, 2022 and April 15, 2022;


 


		(v)	after such principal and interest payments, the outstanding principal balance under the note as of April 15, 2022 will be $499,700.52;
and
	 	 	 



		(vi)	Borrower may pay off the loan at any time prior to the Maturity Date without penalty which will also eliminate any future extension
fees.
	 	 	 



 


All other terms contained in the Note and the
Loan Documents shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect.


 




     


     


    

 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Borrower and the Holder
have executed this Agreement as of the date first written above and effective as the date stated above.


 


	BORROWER:
	 
	JDone LLC
	By: 	Generation Hemp, Inc.	 



 


	By:	/s/ Gary C. Evans	 
	Gary C. Evans
	Chairman and Chief Executive Officer



 


	ACKNOWLEDGED AND AGREED:
	HOLDER:
	 
	By:	/s/ Thomas S. Yang	 
	Thomas S. Yang
212 Airport Drive Lewis Run, PA 16738

www.bradfordairport.net 814-368-5928 EX 10

 August 6, 2012

Mr. Dennis J. DeVany

Chief, Essential Air Service Division, X-53

Office of Aviation Analysis

United States Department of Transportation

Dear Mr. Devany;

On behalf of the Bradford Regional Airport Authority, representing McKean, Cameron, Elk and 

Warren, the Airport Authority supports the bid proposal submitted by Silver Airways, dba 

United Express to provide air service, under the Essential Air Service Program. 

The air carrier has provided service since September of 2008 and has performed reasonably well 

in spite of some winter weather difficulties. The carrier has recently gone through a bankruptcy, 

reorganization and re-branding under new management and we anticipate that this along with the 

completed merger with United Airlines will produce a strong air service operator for our 

communities. The proposed service through the Cleveland hub offers the most efficient and 

realistic connection between this rural region and the National Air Transport System. This 

connectivity is necessary for the economic vitality of the region.

This community will work with the air carrier to improve enplanements and mitigate the carrier’s 

financial risk wherever possible. Silver Airways has met with Community leaders and indicated 

that local management representatives will become more visible in representing the airline. 

The carrier has requested the ability to suspend service to a community with 120 days’ notice. 

The Airport Authority strongly recommends there be discussions between the carrier, Airport 

Authority, community, and your office prior to the approval of any suspension of service. 

Thank you.

Sincerely,

Thomas C. Frungillo 

Thomas C. Frungillo, A.A.E

Airport Director
# United States Court of Appeals

f or the Fifth Circuit

No. 20

- 40057 Summary Calendar

United States of America,

Plaintiff

— Appellee ,

versus

Richard Lee Ramos,

Defendant

— Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 2:19

- CR

- 848

- 1

Before King, Smith, and Wilson, Circuit Judges

. Per Curiam : *
Richard Lee Ramos ple d guilty, pursuant to a written agreement, to conspiracy to transport aliens

. He was sentenced to 120 months in prison, the statutory maximum and effective guidelines range

. On appeal, Ramos

argues first, that ineffective assistance of counsel rendered his guilty plea

* Pursuant to 5th Cir cuit R ule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir cuit R u le 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED February 15, 2021 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 20-40057 Document: 00515744834 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/15/2021No. 20

- 40057

2 invalid , and second, that the district court erred when it increased his sentence for his supervisor y role and denied him a reduction for accept ing responsibility.

The record is not suffici ently developed to allow us fairly to evaluate
Ramos’s ineffective assistance of counsel claims . Therefore, we decline to consider them without prejudice to collateral review. See United States v. Isgar , 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014)

. Further, on th e record before us, Ramos has not shown that his waiver of his right to appeal his sentence is invalid, and his suggestion that his right to appeal his sentence was reinstated by the district court’s comments at sentencing is unavailing. See United
States v. Serrano

- Lara , 698 F.3d 841, 843

- 45 (5th Cir. 2012); Fed. R.
Crim. P. 11(c)(1); see also United States v. De Leon , 915 F.3d 386, 390 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 139 S. Ct. 2731 (2019) ; United States v. Miles , 10 F.3d 1135 , 1140 (5th Cir. 1993)

. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED

. Case: 20-40057 Document: 00515744834 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/15/2021
III 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 154 

Designating October 21, 2005, as ‘‘National Mammography Day’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 25, 2005 

Mr. BIDEN (for himself, Mr. ALLARD, Mr. ALLEN, Mr. BUNNING, Ms. CANTWELL, Mr. COCHRAN, Mr. DORGAN, Mrs. HUTCHISON, Mr. ISAKSON, Ms. 

LANDRIEU, Mr. LAUTENBERG, Mr. SANTORUM, Mr. WYDEN, Mrs. CLINTON, Ms. MIKULSKI, Mr. BINGAMAN, Mrs. MURRAY, Mr. TALENT, Mrs. 

LINCOLN, Mr. GRASSLEY, Ms. MURKOWSKI, Mr. SALAZAR, Mr. 

VOINOVICH, Mr. INHOFE, Mr. NELSON of Nebraska, Mr. CARPER, Mr. 

JOHNSON, Ms. COLLINS, Mr. CRAIG, Mr. SPECTER, Mr. LEAHY, and Mr. 

VITTER) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

JUNE 28, 2005, 

Committee discharged; considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION

Designating October 21, 2005, as ‘‘National Mammography 

Day’’.

Whereas according to the American Cancer Society, in 2005, 

212,930 women will be diagnosed with breast cancer and 

40,410 women will die from this disease; 

Whereas it is estimated that about 2,000,000 women were diagnosed with breast cancer in the 1990s, and that in 

nearly 500,000 of those cases, the cancer resulted in 

death; 
2

SRES 154 ATS 

Whereas African-American women suffer a 30 percent greater mortality rate from breast cancer than White women 

and more than a 100 percent greater mortality rate from 

breast cancer than women from Hispanic, Asian, and 

American Indian populations; 

Whereas the risk of breast cancer increases with age, with a 

woman at age 70 having twice as much of a chance of 

developing the disease as a woman at age 50; 

Whereas at least 80 percent of the women who get breast 

cancer have no family history of the disease; 

Whereas mammograms, when operated professionally at a 

certified facility, can provide safe screening and early detection of breast cancer in many women; 

Whereas mammography is an excellent method for early detection of localized breast cancer, which has a 5-year survival rate of more than 97 percent; 

Whereas the National Cancer Institute and the American 

Cancer Society continue to recommend periodic mammograms; and 

Whereas the National Breast Cancer Coalition recommends 

that each woman and her health care provider make an 

individual decision about mammography: Now, therefore, 

be it

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates October 21, 2005, as ‘‘National 

3 Mammography Day’’; and 
3

SRES 154 ATS 

1 (2) encourages the people of the United States 

2 to observe the day with appropriate programs and 

3 activities.

Æ
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Corporate Trust Services**

  MAC R1204-010  9062 Old Annapolis Road  Columbia, MD 21045  Tel: 410 884 2000  Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

Re: Annual Statement of Compliancefor JPMBB Commercial Mortgage Securities Trust 2015-C33, Commercial MortgagePass-Through Certificates, Series 2015-C33

 

 

Per the Pooling and ServicingAgreement dated as of November 1, 2015 (the "Agreement"), theundersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., asCertificate Administrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies asfollows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2016 (the "ReportingPeriod"):

 

(a) A review of Wells Fargo'sactivities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under theAgreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and

 

(b) To the best of suchofficer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of itsobligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

 

February 27, 2017

 

 

/s/ Brian Smith

BRIAN SMITH

Vice President

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll  go far |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------|
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         728,419
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          25,410
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                26,971
<TRADING-ASSETS>                               235,818
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  3,985,081
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                     12,690,135
<ALLOWANCE>                                    228,505
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              18,636,988
<DEPOSITS>                                  13,462,842
<SHORT-TERM>                                   859,530
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            520,368
<LONG-TERM>                                  1,928,089
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     27,732
<COMMON>                                       425,366
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,413,061
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              18,636,988
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                591,400
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              104,904
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                11,385
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               707,689
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             248,148
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             321,308
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          386,381
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   39,570
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               5,253
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                315,942
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                237,605
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     152,898
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   152,898
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.81
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.76
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.67
<LOANS-NON>                                     94,479
<LOANS-PAST>                                   438,224
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                 1,754
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                 32,438
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               225,389
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   52,643
<RECOVERIES>                                    10,067
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              228,505
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           228,505
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>