# CE2004084EN.01017601.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/176 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/176

---

(2004/C 84 E/0216)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0219/04

by Dominique Souchet (NI) to the Commission

(30 January 2004)

Subject:   Malta's accession and maritime safety

Subject:

The Maltese commercial fleet, the third largest in the world, includes a number of oil tankers. The ‘Erika’ was registered in Malta, for instance. On the eve of the country's entry into the European Union, ships flying the Maltese flag remain on the Paris Memorandum of Understanding blacklist.

It is not surprising, therefore, that the comprehensive monitoring report of 5 November 2003 on Malta's preparations for membership (1) acknowledges that Malta risks not meeting the membership requirements that apply to the area of maritime transport in time for accession.

1

Is Malta's maritime administration, for all its efforts, actually able to ensure that checks are carried out on vessels that register with it and that Council Directive 94/57 is applied, when the vast majority of these vessels belong to shipowners from third countries?

Likewise, is the Maltese maritime administration capable of verifying that the organisations to which it entrusts inspection, survey and certification duties meet the approval requirements?

If Malta does not satisfactorily honour its duties with regard to inspections and safety, will the burden, and substantial and disproportionate responsibilities, not pass to the port States of the EU? Does the Commission consider that these countries have the regulatory and financial means to deal with a situation of this kind?

In view of the worryingly high detention rate in Community ports of Maltese-flagged vessels, how is the Commission planning to proceed in the case of ships that have been repeatedly detained within a period of a few months?

Answer given by Mrs de Palacio on behalf of the Commission

(10 March 2004)

(10 March 2004)

The Commission agrees with the Honourable Member that future EU Member States need to meet Community maritime safety standards. The Commission reminded Malta, in the comprehensive monitoring report of 5 November 2003 on Malta's preparations for membership, that it had serious concerns, particularly regarding flag State control, and that urgent improvement was needed. The Commission notes that the problems have persisted, though it welcomes the progress made by Malta since the publication of the monitoring report, particularly in aligning its legislation with Community acquis on maritime safety. The Commission will continue to pay close attention to developments in this area.

The Commission will see to it that the Maltese authorities pursue their commitment to recruit properly qualified personnel to meet flag State control requirements.

With regard to the application of Directive 94/57/EC (2), ship ownership is not the decisive factor as the purpose of the Directive is to provide for a system of inspections and surveys in accordance with the provisions in the relevant international conventions — resulting in the issuing, or not, of the appropriate certificates.

2

Following accession, the Maltese authorities will have no choice but to have these tasks carried out by bodies approved at European level in accordance with the provisions of the Directive, and the construction and maintenance standards applicable to the Maltese merchant fleet will have to meet the requirements of one of those bodies. Accordingly, accession will help to improve the safety of the Maltese fleet, which will benefit from the full application of the Community mechanisms ensuring a high level of performance from classification societies. The Commission will ensure that the Maltese authorities, like every other delegating State, meets its obligations to monitor the delegated bodies every two years.

The Commission — while noting the clear and steady reduction in the rate of detention of Maltese ships in recent years — is particularly conscious of the fact that Malta is still on the Paris Memorandum of Understanding blacklist. In any event, the Commission would emphasise that the consequences for Maltese-flagged ships which are detained will not change with Malta's accession to the Union: ships flying the Maltese flag which have been ‘detained more than twice in the course of the preceding 24 months in a port of a State signatory of the MOU’ will be refused access to ports in the Member States in accordance with the provisions of Directive 2001/106/EC (3) amending the port State control Directive.

3

The Commission considers it most important that flag States meet their obligations and would remind the Honourable Member that a legislative proposal on the implementation of international instruments by flag States in the Community is being prepared as part of the new legislative package it will be proposing.

---

(1)  SEC(2003) 1206 final.

1

(2)  Council Directive 94/57/EC of 22 November 1994 on common rules and standards for ship inspection and survey organisations and for the relevant activities of maritime administrations, OJ L 319, 12.12.1994.

2

(3)  Directive 2001/106/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 December 2001 amending Council Directive 9 5/21/EC concerning the enforcement, in respect of shipping using Community ports and sailing in the waters under the jurisdiction of the Member States, of international standards for ship safety, pollution prevention and shipboard living and working conditions (port State control), OJ L 19, 22.1.2002.

3

---