alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

March 28, 2018

No. 04-18-00105-CR

Alphonso A. MCCLOUD,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 187th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017CR6735B

The Honorable Joey Contreras, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The docketing statement was due upon perfecting appeal, but appellant has not filed the 

docketing statement. See Tex. R. App. P. 32.2. We order counsel for the appellant, Kenneth E. 

Baker, to file the docketing statement by April 9, 2018.

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 28th day of March, 2018.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
1

Sutton, Tia

From: Tim Hogan <THogan@afpm.org>

Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2014 11:23 AM

To: Sutton, Tia

Subject: Tier 3 Technical Amendments - Item on Tier 2 sulfur credits

Importance: High

Follow Up Flag: Follow up

Flag Status: Flagged

Tia, I have a suggestion for the upcoming DFR. 

I noticed that in the draft technical amendments for 80.1295 that the benzene credit transfer date may be changed to 

March 31 – used to be the last day in February. This makes complete sense and make things consistent with the 

reporting now due March 31 so you can buy/sell credits up to the reporting date for the prior compliance year. When I 

saw this, I was curious if the same change had been made for Tier 2 sulfur and I don’t see that. See highlighted item 

below. The date of being allowed to transfer Tier 2 sulfur credits needs to be changed to March 31 to be consistent with 

the reporting date just like benzene. Can this revision be made in the Technical Amendments as well? 

§80.315 How are credits used and what are the limitations on credit use? 

(a) Credit use. Credits may be used to meet the applicable refinery or importer annual average sulfur standards 

under §80.195, §80.216, or §80.240, or may be used to meet the offset requirement under §80.271(d)(1) for any refinery 

with an adjustment of itsper-gallon cap standard pursuant to §80.271(a), provided that: 

(1) Sulfur credits used were generated pursuant to the requirements of this subpart; and 

(2) The requirements of paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section are met. 

(b) Credit transfers. (1) Credits obtained from other persons may be used to meet the annual average standards 

specified in §80.195, §80.216, or §80.240, or may be used to meet the offset requirement under §80.271(d)(1) for any 

refinery with an adjustment of itsper-gallon cap standard pursuant to §80.271(a), if all the following conditions are met: 

(i) The credits are generated and reported according to the requirements of this subpart. 

(ii) The credits are used in compliance with the limitations regarding the appropriate periods for credit use in this 

subpart. 

(iii) Any credit transfer takes place no later than the last day of February following the calendar year averaging period 

when the credits are used. 

 

Tim Hogan

Director, Motor Fuels 

American 

Fuel & Petrochemical 

Manufacturers

1667 K Street NW

Suite 700

Washington, DC 20006
2

202.457.0480 office

202.552.8462 direct

202.457.0486 fax

thogan@afpm.org

Learn more about AFPM at afpm.org

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This electronic message contains information from the American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers 

that may be confidential or privileged. The information is intended solely for the use of the individual(s) or entity (ies) named above. If 

you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this message is 

prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by telephone at (202) 457-0480 or by reply e-mail and 

permanently delete this e-mail, any attachments, and all copies thereof.
EXHIBIT 32.1
 
 
 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
 SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In connection with the quarterly report of United-Guardian, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Kenneth H. Globus,  President of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (i) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (ii) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented and results of operations of the Company for the periods presented.
 
 
 Date:  August 12, 2009                                                                          By: /s/
Kenneth H. Globus
 Kenneth H. Globus
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 13 (Monday, January 22, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 2674]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-785]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP04-98-002]


Indicated Shippers v. Columbia Gulf Transmission Company; Notice 
of Compliance Filing

January 16, 2007.
    Take notice that on January 5, 2007, Columbia Gulf Transmission 
Company (Columbia Gulf) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, Second Revised Volume No. 1, the following pro forma tariff 
sheets:

Second Revised Sheet No. 235
First Revised Sheet No. 236
Original Sheet No. 237

    Any person desiring to protest this filing must file in accordance 
with Rule 211 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 
CFR 385.211). Protests to this filing will be considered by the 
Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will 
not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Such protests 
must be filed on or before the date as indicated below. Anyone filing a 
protest must serve a copy of that document on all the parties to the 
proceeding.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests in lieu 
of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons 
unable to file electronically should submit an original and 14 copies 
of the protest to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First 
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#074142554448696b6e696254727777687573476162756429606871"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="53151601101c3d3f3a3d36002623233c212713353621307d343c25">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Protest Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on January 26, 2007.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E7-785 Filed 1-19-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# Official Journal C 260/2007

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 260 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5031 October 2007 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 260

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5031 October 2007

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES |
| | Commission |
| 2007/C 260/01 | Final accounts for the financial year 2006 of the 6th, 7th, 8th and 9th European Development Funds | 1 |
| 2007/C 260/02 | Statement of Assurance by the Court of Auditors on the 6th, 7th, 8th and 9th European Development Funds (EDFs) for the financial year 2006 | 258 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES

Commission

2007/C 260/01

Final accounts for the financial year 2006 of the 6th, 7th, 8th and 9th European Development Funds

1

2007/C 260/02

Statement of Assurance by the Court of Auditors on the 6th, 7th, 8th and 9th European Development Funds (EDFs) for the financial year 2006

258

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 22 - 0048 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. SKY M. LITTLECOYOTE,

Defendant and Appellant.

**G RANT**  Pursuant to authority granted under Mont. R. App. P. 26(1), the Appellant is given an extension of time until October 16 , 202 3 , to prepare, file, and serve the Appellant’s reply brief. No further extensions will be granted.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 7 2023

09/07/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0048
&\%EDsr4,UNITEDSTATESENVIRONMENTALPROTECTIONAGENCYREGION4SAMNUNNATLANTAFEDERAL CENTER61FOKSYTHSTREETATLANTAGEORGIA30303-8960?MR14I'mMr.JohnLyons, DirectorDivisionofAirPollution ControlKentucky Energy and Environment Cabinet500Metro Street,12~Floor,CapitalPlaza Tower StreetFrankfort, Kentucky40601-1 957Dear Mr. Lyons:Enclosedis thefinalend-of-yearreport foryouragency'sFY2011AirPollution Controlgrantauthorizedby§105 of the CleanAirAct.Thisreportoutlinesyouragency'svarious grantcommitmentsandtheir status. Since there werenoissuesand noadjustmentsnecessary your reportisnowfinalized.This letterdocumentstheconclusionof thejoint evaluation process requiredby40Code ofFederalRegulations35.115andidentifiedasa commitmentinyourFY201 1 AirPlanningAgreement underCross Cutting Issues.We appreciate theprogressyoumade inFY2011andlook forwardtocontinuing ourjointeffortstoprotectandimprove air quality.If youhave any questions regardingyour grant,pleasecontactStuartPerryat(404) 562-8980orMariePersingerat (404)562-9048.Sincerely,R.~ou&asNeeleyChiefAirToxicsandMonitoring BranchAir,Pesticides, andToxicsManagementDivisionEnclosureInternet Address(URL)http:llwww.epa.govRecycled/RecyclablePrinted withVegetableOil BasedInksonRecycledPaper(Minimum30%Postconsumer)
# C_2008310EN.01S00301.xml

| 5.12.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 310/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.12.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 310/s3

---

NOTE TO THE READER

NOTE TO THE READER

The institutions have decided no longer to quote in their texts the last amendment to cited acts.

Unless otherwise indicated, references to acts in the texts published here are to the version of those acts currently in force.

---
No. 59180.

protest 249578-K (New York).

#### D. C. Andrews & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

An examination of the papers in this case disclosing nothing that would tend in any way to overcome the presumption of correctness attaching to the decision of the collector, the protest was overruled.
# C_2023007EN.01004301.xml

| 9.1.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 7/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.1.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 7/43

---

Action brought on 7 November 2022 — Dr. Neumann & Kindler v EUIPO — Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings (LabCorp)

(Case T-674/22)

(2023/C 7/52)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Applicant: Dr. Neumann & Kindler GmbH & Co. KG (Bochum, Germany) (represented by: T. Pfeifer and N. Gottschalk, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings (Burlington, North Carolina, United States)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: Application for the EU figurative mark LabCorp — Application No 15 174 774

Proceedings before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 25 August 2022 in Case R 1998/2020-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings before the General Court of the European Union and order the potential intervener to pay the costs of the appeal proceedings before EUIPO. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings before the General Court of the European Union and order the potential intervener to pay the costs of the appeal proceedings before EUIPO.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 47(2) and (3) of Regulation 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 47(2) and (3) of Regulation 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
No. 56125.

protest 164355-K (New York).

#### Stoffel & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

The protest was dismissed.
Burton E. Broome
Vice President and Controller
Transamerica Corporation
600 Montgomery Street
San Francisco, CA  94111

Dear Mr. Broome:

Part I, Item 1 of Transamerica  Corporation's  Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended March 31, 1999  describes a change in the method of accounting
for tax service revenue. You have advised us that you believe that the change is
to  a  preferable  method  in  your  circumstances   because  it  results  in  a
proportional  recognition  of income over the service  period in relation to the
effort required to perform the related services.

There are no  authoritative  criteria for determining a `preferable' tax service
revenue  recognition method based on the particular  circumstances;  however, we
conclude that the change in the method of accounting for tax service  revenue is
to an acceptable  alternative  method which, based on your business judgement to
make  this  change  for  the  reason  cited  above,   is   preferable   in  your
circumstances.  We have not  conducted  an audit in  accordance  with  generally
accepted  auditing  standards of any financial  statements  of the  Transamerica
Corporation  as of any date or for any period  subsequent  to December 31, 1998,
and  therefore  we do not  express any opinion on any  financial  statements  of
Transamerica Corporation subsequent to that date.


                                                 Very truly yours,

                                                 /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

San Francisco, California
April 28, 1999
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

Case No. 5D23-2860

LT Case No. 2018-CF-009646-A

_____________________________

CURTIS E. PENDERGRASS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

3.800 appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Kevin A. Blazs, Judge.

Curtis E. Pendergrass, Graceville, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Adam B. Wilson, Assistant 

Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

January 26, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.315(a).

JAY and KILBANE, JJ., concur.

MAKAR, J., concurs in result, with opinion.
2

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
3

 Case No. 5D23-2860

LT Case No. 2018-CF-009646-A

MAKAR, J., concurring in result, with opinion.

I concur in affirmance but do not rely on the summary 

affirmance rule in doing so.
confidential







ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE



Reference is hereby made to
that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of April 1, 2016, by and among DEUTSCHE MORTGAGE & ASSET RECEIVING CORPORATION,
as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, MIDLAND LOAN SERVICES, A DIVISION OF PNC BANK, NATIONAL
ASSOCIATION, as Special Servicer, WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as
Certificate Administrator, Paying Agent and Custodian and PARK BRIDGE LENDER SERVICES LLC, as Operating Advisor and Asset Representations
Reviewer with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2016-C1 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized
terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

Pursuant to Section 10.11 of
this Agreement, I, Leslie Hayton, Managing Director of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

| | 1. | A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2018 through
December 31, 2018 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made
under my supervision, and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master
Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned
has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2019.





_____________________________________

Leslie Hayton

Managing Director
Wells Fargo Bank















confidential
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**517 KA 15-01130** 
PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, DEJOSEPH, AND NEMOYER, JJ.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

DANIEL FINOCCHIARO, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

FRANK H. HISCOCK LEGAL AID SOCIETY, SYRACUSE (EVAN HANNAY OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

WILLIAM J. FITZPATRICK, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, SYRACUSE (JAMES P. MAXWELL OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Appeal from an order of the Onondaga County Court (Joseph E. Fahey, J.), entered January 27, 2015. The order determined that defendant is a level three risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act.

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from an order designating him a level three sex offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law § 168 et seq. ). Contrary to defendant’s contention, County Court did not “summarily adopt[ ]” the recommendation of the Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders in classifying defendant as a level three risk, nor did the court fail to set forth the conclusions of law upon which it based its determination. Moreover, the People did not fail to establish facts supporting the level three risk determination by clear and convincing evidence, as required ( see § 168-n [3]; People v Mingo , 12 NY3d 563, 571; People v Warrior , 57 AD3d 1471, 1472; People v Hamelinck , 23 AD3d 1060, 1060). In particular, the People adduced clear and convincing proof supporting the assessment of 20 points against defendant under risk factor 7, which covers defendant’s relationship with the victim. Given defendant’s plea of guilty to disseminating indecent material to a 12- year-old in violation of Penal Law § 235.22, and further considering defendant’s plea of guilty to having raped or sexually abused at least four additional underage girls throughout 2010, we conclude that there is ample evidence supporting the finding that defendant established his relationship with the 12-year-old for the purpose of victimizing her.

We reject defendant’s contention that the court erred in failing to consider, as a basis for a downward departure from the presumptive**-2- 517 KA 15-01130** 

risk level, defendant’s expressions of remorse at sentencing. “A departure from the presumptive risk level is warranted where ‘there exists an aggravating or mitigating factor of a kind or to a degree, not otherwise adequately taken into account by the guidelines’ (Sex Offender Registration Act: Risk Assessment Guidelines and Commentary at 4 [1997 ed])” ( People v Guaman
, 8 AD3d 545, 545; see People v Gillotti
, 23 NY3d 841, 861; Hamelinck , 23 AD3d at 1060). An offender’s acceptance or nonacceptance of responsibility is taken into account by the guidelines ( see People v Filkins , 128 AD3d 1231, 1232, lv denied 26 NY3d 904).

Entered: June 10, 2016 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the 
Company's Balance Sheet as of June 30, 1998 and the Statement Of Income
for the year ended June 30, 1998, and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial staements.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          84,125
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0    
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                84,125
<PP&E>                                       7,995,908
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,878,473
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,216,567<F1>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           46,621<F2>
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (632,350)        
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,216,567<F3>
<SALES>                                        534,579<F4>
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               534,579
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                33,915<F5>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             133,084
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                367,580
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            367,580
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   367,580
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   510.53<F6>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   510.53<F6>
<FN>
<F1>Includes unamortized mortgage refinancing costs           
<F2>Accrued interest on mortgage and first mortgage principal payment due 
    within one year 
<F3>Includes long-term debt 
<F4>Rental income includes basic rent and advance of primary overage rent 
<F5>Supervisory services and amortization of mortgage refinance costs 
<F6>Earnings per $5,000 participation unit, based on 720 participation units
    outstanding during the period
</FN>
        


</TABLE>