alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Order entered July 26, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-00651-CV

ANDREW WHITE, CHELSEA BALESTRA, WESLEY MURRAY,

DAVID GAWLAS, AND BENJAMIN LORD, Appellants

V.

NATIONAL HEALTH INVESTORS AND NHI-REIT OF AXEL LLC, Appellees

On Appeal from the 95th District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-18-07841

ORDER

Before the Court is the July 23, 2019 unopposed motion of appellee NHI-REIT of Axel 

LLC for an extension of time to file its brief on the merits. We GRANT the motion and extend 

the time to August 20, 2019.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE
# Official Journal C 37A/14 F

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 37A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5214 February 2009 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 37A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5214 February 2009

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | Commission |
| 2009/C 037A/01 | Directorate-General for External Relations (DG RELEX) — Publication of a vacancy for a Principal Adviser Function (Grade AD 14) (in Brussels) (Article 29(2) of the Staff Regulations) — COM/2009/10169 | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

Commission

2009/C 037A/01

Directorate-General for External Relations (DG RELEX) — Publication of a vacancy for a Principal Adviser Function (Grade AD 14) (in Brussels) (Article 29(2) of the Staff Regulations) — COM/2009/10169

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY

APPELLATE DIVISION

DOCKET NO. A-2473-19

U.S. BANK N.A., AS TRUSTEE

F/B/O HOLDERS OF 

STRUCTURED ASSET

MORTGAGE INVESTMENTS II 

INC., BEAR STEARNS ALT-A

TRUST, MORTGAGE PASSTHROUGH CERTIFICATES, 

SERIES 2006-3,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

DORIS D. ODOEMENE AND

EMMANUEL C. ODOEMENE,

wife and husband,

Defendants-Appellants,

and

STATE OF NEW JERSEY,

Defendant.

____________________________

Submitted February 9, 2021– Decided June 17, 2021

Before Judges Fisher and Gummer.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE

APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION

This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although it is posted on the 

internet, this opinion is binding only on the parties in the case and its use in other cases is limited. R. 1:36-3.
2

A-2473-19

On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, 

Chancery Division, Essex County, Docket No. F016656-18.

Doris D. Odoemene and Emmanuel C. Odoemene, 

appellants pro se.

Milstead and Associates, LLC, attorneys for respondent 

(Roger Fay, on the brief). 

PER CURIAM

In this foreclosure case, defendants appeal (1) an order granting plaintiff's 

motion for summary judgment, striking defendants' answer, and denying 

defendants' cross-motion to dismiss the complaint and (2) final judgment. 

Defendants argue:

I. The Trial Court erred and abused its discretion in not 

dismissing the Complaint when Plaintiff did not show 

it had physical possession of the Note at the time of 

filing the Complaint.

II. The Trial Court erred and abused its discretion by 

avoiding to make [sic] a decision regarding a pre-filing 

requirement when there is a non[-]compliant and 

deficient NOI.

III. The Trial Court erred and abused its discretion in 

concluding Plaintiff has established that Defendants 

defaulted on the Note.

We find insufficient merit in these arguments to warrant discussion in a 

written opinion, R. 2:11-3(e)(1)(E).
3

A-2473-19

Affirmed.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

CHRISTOPHER DINAN A/K/A 

CHRISTOPHER WILSON,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 288 EAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 12th day of October, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
EPA Reg. No. 83997-2 vol. 3 

(formerly 10465-33)
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### FAA - 2013 - 05 55 These comments are in **Directorate ID:** 

### 201 0 - SW - 0 4 7 - AD response to an SNPRM Originating Office Tracking No.: **Next Step:** FRAN SNPRM 

### N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are required. No 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s, lis t latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA - IR- M - 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD:

### Page 2 of 3

If **NO** , we don’t agree because **For additional issues, do uble**  **- click**  **here**

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.: **ASE** Printed Name **: Date** 

**Branch M anager**  **Date**
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 96-2166

___________

Latham Riley Bell, *

*

Petitioner - Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Eastern District of Missouri.

United States of America, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Respondent - Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: April 18, 1997

Filed: July 25, 1997

___________

Before LOKEN, MAGILL, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

In December 1990, Latham Riley Bell pleaded guilty to one count of possession

with intent to distribute cocaine in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), and one count

of using a firearm during and in relation to a drug trafficking crime in violation of 18

U.S.C. § 924(c)(1). In December 1995, he filed this successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255

motion seeking to vacate the § 924(c)(1) conviction in the wake of Bailey v. United

States, 116 S. Ct. 501 (1995). The district court granted the motion over the

government’s objection. The court’s remedy was not merely to vacate Bell’s guilty 
-2-

plea; it set aside the § 924(c)(1) conviction and ordered Bell released from prison. The

government appeals. 

The district court’s decision was made without the benefit of our subsequent

decisions concerning Bailey-inspired collateral attacks on convictions that were based

upon guilty pleas. Accordingly, the district court’s orders of March 12, 1996, and

March 18, 1996, are vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light

of Bousley v. Brooks, 97 F.3d 284 (8th Cir. 1996), and Walker v. United States, No.

96-2086, 1997 WL 298449 (8th Cir. June 6, 1997).

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
# C_2016335EN.01002501.xml

| 12.9.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 335/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.9.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 335/25

---

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 7 July 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Krajský soud v Ostravě — Czech Republic) — Ivo Muladi v Krajský úřad Moravskoslezského kraje

(Case C-447/15) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Transport - Directive 2003/59/EC - Obligation to obtain an initial qualification - Article 4 - Acquired rights - Holders of driving licences issued before the dates laid down in Article 4 - Exemption from the obligation to obtain an initial qualification - National legislation setting an additional requirement for periodic training of 35 hours duration in order to benefit from that exemption))

(2016/C 335/33)

Language of the case: Czech

Referring court

Referring court

Krajský soud v Ostravě

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Ivo Muladi

Applicant:

Defendant: Krajský úřad Moravskoslezského kraje

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 4 of Directive 2003/59/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 July 2003 on the initial qualification and periodic training of drivers of certain road vehicles for the carriage of goods or passengers, amending Council Regulation (EEC) No 3820/85 and Council Directive 91/439/EEC and repealing Council Directive 76/914/EEC must be interpreted as not precluding national legislation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, under which, before the driving activity in question may be carried out, periodic training of 35 hours duration has to be completed by persons who are exempted, under Article 4, from the requirement that drivers of certain road vehicles for the carriage of goods or passengers obtain an initial qualification.

---

(1)  OJ C 389, 23.11.2015.

1

---
III 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 81 

Recognizing the contribution of Chris LeDoux to country music. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 10, 2005 

Mr. BURNS (for himself, Mr. THOMAS, and Mr. ENZI) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION

Recognizing the contribution of Chris LeDoux to country 

music.

Whereas Chris LeDoux, a former rodeo world champion in 

bareback riding and country music star, died on March 

9, 2005; 

Whereas Chris LeDoux was born in Biloxi, Mississippi, in 

1948; 

Whereas Chris LeDoux won the Wyoming State Rodeo 

Championship in high school, continued riding in college, 

earning a rodeo scholarship, and rode professionally, winning the bareback championship at the National Rodeo 

Finals; 

Whereas Chris LeDoux made important contributions to the 

country music community, through songs such as 
2

•SRES 81 ATS

‘‘Whatcha Gonna Do With a Cowboy’’ and ‘‘Much Too 

Young to Feel this Damn Old’’; and 

Whereas Chris LeDoux worked with well-known artists 

throughout his career, such as Garth Brooks and Charlie 

Daniels: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) recognizes the contribution of Chris LeDoux 

3 to country music; 

4 (2) has heard with profound sorrow and deep 

5 regret of the death of Chris LeDoux; and 

6 (3) directs the Secretary of the Senate transmit 

7 enrolled copies of this resolution to the House of 

8 Representatives and the family of Chris LeDoux.

Æ
III 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 73

Honoring the life of Enrique ‘‘Kiki’’ Camarena. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 8, 2005

Mr. BIDEN submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

MARCH 11, 2005

Committee discharged; considered and agreed to. 

RESOLUTION

Honoring the life of Enrique ‘‘Kiki’’ Camarena.

Whereas Enrique ‘‘Kiki’’ Camarena, a Special Agent of the 

Drug Enforcement Administration for 11 years, was abducted and brutally murdered by drug barons in 1985; 

Whereas Enrique Camarena dedicated his life to serving the 

law enforcement community and the Nation as a whole 

and was the devoted husband of Geneva Alvarado and 

loving father of Enrique, Daniel, and Eric; 

Whereas Enrique Camarena received 2 Sustained Superior 

Performance Awards and a Special Achievement Award 

while serving the Drug Enforcement Administration; 

Whereas Enrique Camarena’s dedication to reducing the 

scourge of drugs eventually cost him his life; 
2

SRES 73 ATS 

Whereas ‘‘Camarena Clubs’’ to combat drug abuse have been 

created in high schools across the Nation to honor his 

memory; 

Whereas Enrique Camarena is honored each year during National Red Ribbon Week; and 

Whereas the 20th Anniversary of Enrique Camarena’s death 

will be specially honored on March 9, 2005, at the Drug 

Enforcement Administration headquarters: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) mourns the loss of Enrique ‘‘Kiki’’ 

3 Camarena; 

4 (2) recognizes the contributions of Enrique 

5 Camarena to our National efforts to combat drug 

6 abuse; 

7 (3) admires the courage and dedication of 

8 Enrique Camarena in his work as a Special Agent 

9 of the Drug Enforcement Administration; 

10 (4) expresses gratitude for the legacy left by 

11 Enrique Camarena; and 

12 (5) directs the Secretary of the Senate to trans13 mit an enrolled copy of this resolution to the family 

14 of Enrique Camarena.

Æ
# C_2015245EN.01001001.xml

| 27.7.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 245/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.7.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 245/10

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Catania (Italy) lodged on 19 May 2015 — Criminal proceedings against Snezhana Velikova

(Case C-228/15)

(2015/C 245/13)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunale di Catania

Party to the main proceedings

Party to the main proceedings

Snezhana Velikova

Question referred

Question referred

Are Articles 20 and 21 of [Legislative Decree No 30 of 6 February 2007] and [subsequent amendments] implementing Directive 2004/38/EC (1) contrary to [European Union] law?

1

---

(1)  Directive 2004/38/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the right of citizens of the Union and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States amending Regulation (EEC) No 1612/68 and repealing Directives 64/221/EEC, 68/360/EEC, 72/194/EEC, 73/148/EEC, 75/34/EEC, 75/35/EEC, 90/364/EEC, 90/365/EEC and 93/96/EEC (OJ 2004 L 158, p. 77).

1

---
No. 50256.

#### Protests 54496-K, etc., of Inter-Maritime Forwarding Co., Inc. (New York).

*273Opinion by

Ekwall, J.'

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the court found that the facts herein agreed upon were such as to bring the case within the holding in *John Barr*v. *United States*(11 Cust. Ct. 88, C. D. 801), which record was incorporated herein. (See *John Barr*v. *United States,*324 U. S. 83, decided February 5, 1945.) In accordance therewith it was held that the currency of the invoices should be converted at the buying rate in the New York market at noon on the day of exportation (the “free” rate of exchange for pounds sterling), as certified by the Federal Reserve bank and set forth by the collector on each of the entries. The protests were sustained to this extent.
# C_2015254EN.01000901.xml

| 3.8.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 254/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.8.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 254/9

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal administratif (Luxembourg) lodged on 22 May 2015 — Maria do Céu Brangança Linares Verruga, Jacinto Manuel Sousa Verruga, André Angelo Linares Verruga v Ministre de l’Enseignement supérieur et de la recherche

(Case C-238/15)

(2015/C 254/12)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunal administratif

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Maria do Céu Brangança Linares Verruga, Jacinto Manuel Sousa Verruga, André Angelo Linares Verruga

Applicants:

Defendant: Ministre de l’Enseignement supérieur et de la recherche

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Is the condition imposed on students not residing in the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg by Article 2 bis of the Law of 22 June 2000 on State financial aid for higher education — which was added by the Law of 19 July 2013 and which does not take into account any other connecting factor —, namely that they must be the children of workers who have been employed or have carried out their activity in Luxembourg for a continuous period of at least five years at the time the application for financial aid is made, justified by the considerations relating to education policy and budgetary policy put forward by the Luxembourg State, and appropriate and proportionate in each case in relation to the objective pursued, namely of bringing about an increase in the proportion of persons with a higher education degree while seeking to ensure that those persons, having benefited from the possibility offered by the system of aid concerned in order to finance their studies — undertaken as the case may be abroad — will return to Luxembourg in order to apply their knowledge for the benefit of the economic development of that Member State?

bis

---
110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 105

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas one of the first public appeals for women’s suffrage 

came in 1848 when Lucretia Mott and Elizabeth Cady 

Stanton called a women’s rights convention in Seneca 

Falls, New York, on July 19, 1848; 

Whereas Sojourner Truth gave her famous speech titled 

‘‘Ain’t I a Woman?’’ at the 1851 Women’s Rights Convention, in Akron, Ohio;
2

•HCON 105 EH 

Whereas, in 1869, women suffragists formed the National 

Woman Suffrage Association and the American Woman 

Suffrage Association, which were national organizations 

designed to work for the right of women to vote; 

Whereas these organizations united in 1890 to form the National American Woman Suffrage Association; 

Whereas, in 1872, Susan B. Anthony and a group of women 

voted in the Presidential election, in Rochester, New 

York; 

Whereas Susan B. Anthony was arrested and fined for voting 

illegally; 

Whereas at her trial, which attracted nationwide attention, 

Susan B. Anthony made a speech that ended with the 

following slogan: ‘‘Resistance to tyranny is obedience to 

God’’; 

Whereas, on January 25, 1887, the United States Senate 

voted on women’s suffrage for the first time; 

Whereas, during the early 1900s, a new generation of leaders 

joined the women’s suffrage movement, including Carrie 

Chapman Catt, Maud Wood Park, Lucy Burns, Alice 

Paul, and Harriot E. Blatch; 

Whereas women’s suffrage leaders devoted most of their efforts to marches, picketing, and other active forms of 

protest; 

Whereas Alice Paul and others chained themselves to the 

White House fence; 

Whereas women suffragists were often arrested and sent to 

jail, where many of them went on hunger strikes; 

Whereas almost 5,000 people paraded for women’s suffrage 

up Pennsylvania Avenue, in Washington, DC; 
3

•HCON 105 EH 

Whereas, on August 18, 1920, ratification of the 19th 

amendment to the Constitution was completed, thus 

guaranteeing women in the United States the right to 

vote; 

Whereas July 19th is the anniversary of the first women’s 

rights convention; and 

Whereas designating July 19th as National Suffragists Day 

would raise awareness of the importance of women suffragists who fought for and won the right of women to 

vote in the United States: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That Congress supports the goals and ideals 

3 of a National Suffragists Day to promote awareness of 

4 the importance of the women suffragists who worked for 

5 the right of women to vote in the United States. 

Passed the House of Representatives May 8, 2007. 

Attest:

Clerk. 
110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 105

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Supporting the goals and ideals of a National Sufthe right of women to vote in the United States. tance of the women suffragists who worked for fragists Day to promote awareness of the impor-
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      Exhibit 99

                            TRW Inc. and Subsidiaries
                        Computation of Ratio of Earnings
                          to Fixed Charges - Unaudited

                         (In millions except ratio data)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                              Three Months                   Years Ended December 31
                                  ended        -------------------------------------------------------
                              March 31, 1997     1996        1995        1994       1993         1992
                              --------------   ----------  ---------   ---------  ----------   -------

<S>                                <C>         <C>           <C>        <C>         <C>        <C>   
Earnings from continuing
  operations before income
  taxes                            $194.6      $302.2(A)     $625.5     $435.5      $289.2     $276.4

Unconsolidated affiliates            (0.8)        1.4           1.3       (0.6)        0.7       (0.9)

Minority earnings                     5.9        11.5          10.8        7.7         1.4        0.1

Fixed charges excluding
  capitalized interest               31.5       129.0         137.2      145.3       177.5      208.1
                                   ------      ------        ------     ------      ------     ------

Earnings                           $231.2      $444.1        $774.8     $587.9      $468.8     $483.7
                                   ------      ------        ------     ------      ------     ------



Fixed Charges:
Interest expense                    $19.7       $84.2         $94.7     $104.7      $137.4     $162.1

Capitalized interest                  1.0         3.5           5.1        6.6         7.9       12.7

Portion of rents representa-
  tive of interest factor            11.8        43.2          41.4       39.2        37.9       45.8

Interest expense of uncon-
  solidated affiliates                0.0         1.6           1.1        1.4         2.2        0.2
                                   ------      ------        ------     ------      ------     ------

Total fixed charges                 $32.5      $132.5        $142.3     $151.9      $185.4     $220.8
                                   ------      ------        ------     ------      ------     ------
Ratio of earnings to fixed
 charges                              7.1x        3.4x          5.4x       3.9x        2.5x       2.2x
                                   ------      ------        ------     ------      ------     ------

<FN>
(A)    The 1996 earnings from continuing operations before income taxes of
       $302.2 million includes a charge of $384.8 million as a result of actions
       taken in the automotive and space and defense businesses.
</TABLE>