alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(Reap. Dec. 8302)

#### International Packers Commercial Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States

Entry No. 806-H, etc.

(Decided April 8, 1954)

Barnes, *Richardson & Colburn*for the plaintiffs.

*Warren E. Burger,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Johnson, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule “A,” hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted *609for decision upon tlie following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the attorneys for the parties hereto that the merchandise covered by the appeals to re-appraisement set forth in Schedule A, attached hereto and made a part hereof, consists of canned corned beef imported from Argentina, packed 24 12-ounee tins per case.

> That the issues involved in said appeals to reappraisement are similar in all material respects to the issues involved in *United States*v. *International Commercial Co., Inc. and Armour & Co.,*Reapt. Dec. 8112.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the value or price, at the time of exportation of the involved merchandise to the United States, at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal market of Argentina in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade for exportation to the United States, including cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature, and all other costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed, ready for shipment to the United States was $5.50 per case, less 9.4%.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that on or about the date of exportation of the merchandise here involved, such or similar merchandise was not freely offered for sale for home consumption in Argentina.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the record in *United States*v. *International Commercial Co., Inc. and Armour & Co.,*Reapt. Dec. 8112, be incorporated in the record in the reappraisement appeals set forth in the attached schedule, which appeals are submitted for decision on this stipulation.

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such value was $5.50 per case, less 9.4 per centum.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
Exhibit 35.1

Servicer Compliance Statement of AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.

This Annual Statement as to Compliance is delivered to you pursuant to Section 4.10 (a) of the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of April 6, 2016
(the Agreement) and Item 1123 of Regulation AB, executed in connection with the formation of AmeriCredit Automobile Receivables Trust 2016-2 (the Trust), the issuance of the Notes by
the Trust and the closing of the transactions and the execution and delivery of the various documents by AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. (the Servicer) and AFS SenSub Corp. in connection therewith. The capitalized terms used herein
shall have the same meanings as in the Agreement.

The undersigned certifies that I am the Executive Vice President, Corporate Controller
and Chief Accounting Officer of the Servicer. I further certify as follows:



| | 1. | I have conducted, or caused to be conducted under my supervision, a review of the Servicer during the preceding period from January 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017, and its performance under the Agreement.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, following such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such period, and, to the best of my knowledge, there has been no default in the
fulfillment of any such obligation.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     |  |                                         |  |  |  |                      
|------------------------------------ |  | --------------------------------------- |  |  |  | ---------------------
|AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. |  |                                         |  | 
|                                     |  |                                         | 
|By:                                  |  | /s/ Connie Coffey                       |  |  |  | Dated: March 15, 2018
|                                     |  | Connie Coffey                           |  |  |  |                      
|                                     |  | Executive Vice President, Corporate     |  |  |  |                      
|                                     |  | Controller and Chief Accounting Officer |  |  |  |
|  | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;                and |
|--|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of UAL                Corporation. |
|--|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/              Glenn F. Tilton       |   |
|---------------------------------------------|--------|
| Glenn                F. Tilton              |   |
| Chairman,                President and      |   |
| Chief                Executive Officer      |   |
|                                        |   |
|                                        |   |
| /s/              Frederic F. Brace     |   |
| Frederic                F. Brace            |   |
| Executive                Vice President and |   |
| Chief                Financial Officer      |   |
|                                        |   |
|                                        |   |
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

DARREN T. VALMYR
, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 17

- 90

[ March 29, 2018 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; David A. Haimes , Judge; L.T. Case No. 15

- 012523

CF10A

.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Patrick B. Burke, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Mitchell A. Egber, Assistant Attorney Gen eral, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

C IKLIN
, C ONNER

, JJ., and R OBERTS

, K ATHLEEN H ., Associate Judge, concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
# C_2016251EN.01000301.xml

| 11.7.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 251/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.7.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 251/3

---

Appeal brought on 9 November 2015 by Mansour Dairek Attoumi against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) delivered on 9 September 2015 in Case T-278/14 Dairek Attoumi v OHIM-Diesel

Dairek Attoumi

OHIM-Diesel

(Case C-578/15 P)

(2016/C 251/03)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Mansour Dairek Attoumi (represented by: E. Manresa Medina and J.M. Manresa Medina, abogados)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office and Diesel, S.P.A.

Other parties to the proceedings:

By order of 26 May 2016, the Court of Justice (Tenth Chamber) dismissed the appeal and ordered Mr Mansour Dairek Attoumi to pay the costs.

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Housing and Urban Development

          - [Docket No. FR-4966-N-04] 

# AGENCY:

Office of the Deputy Secretary, HUD. 

# ACTION:

Notice of appointment. 

# SUMMARY:

The Department of Housing and Urban Development announces the appointment of Michael Flynn as a member of the Departmental Performance Review Board. The address is: Department of Housing and Urban Development, Washington, DC 20410-3000. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Persons desiring any further information about the Performance Review Board and its members may contact Earnestine Pruitt, Director, Executive Personnel Management Division, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Washington, DC 20410; telephone (202) 708-1381 (this is not a toll-free number). 

Dated: April 4, 2007. 

Roy A. Bernardi, 

Deputy Secretary.

 [FR Doc. E7-8191 Filed 4-27-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4210-67-P
III 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 426 

Supporting the goals and ideals of National Campus Safety Awareness Month. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 5, 2006 

Mr. SPECTER (for himself and Mr. FEINGOLD) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting the goals and ideals of National Campus Safety 

Awareness Month. 

Whereas students and faculty on college and university campuses are subject to criminal threats from— 

(1) within the borders of their respective institutions; and 

(2) the communities in which their respective institutions are located; 

Whereas, between 2001 and 2003, 84 homicides, 7,941 sex 

offenses, 9,296 aggravated assaults, and 3,367 arsons on 

the campuses of colleges and universities in the United 

States were reported under the Jeanne Clery Disclosure 

of Campus Security Policy and Campus Crime Statistics 

Act (20 U.S.C. 1092(f)); 


cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 426 IS

Whereas between 1⁄5 and 1⁄4 of all female students become the 

victim of a completed or attempted rape, usually by 

someone they know, during their college careers; 

Whereas more than 97,000 students between the ages of 18 

and 24 are victims of alcohol-related sexual assaults each 

year; 

Whereas, each year, more than 696,000 students between the 

ages of 18 and 24 are assaulted by another student who 

has been drinking; 

Whereas 1,700 college students between the ages of 18 and 

24 die each year from alcohol-related unintentional injuries, including motor vehicle crashes; 

Whereas, according to the Center for Campus Fire Safety, 

there were 82 fire fatalities in student housing buildings 

between January 2000 and January 2006; 

Whereas Security On Campus, Inc., a national group dedicated to promoting safety and security on college and 

university campuses, has designated September 2006 as 

‘‘National Campus Safety Awareness Month’’; and 

Whereas the designation of National Campus Safety Awareness Month provides an opportunity to colleges and universities to inform students about— 

(1) existing campus crime trends; 

(2) campus security policies; 

(3) crime prevention techniques; 

(4) fire safety issues; and 

(5) alcohol and other drug education, prevention, 

and treatment programs: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 


cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
3 

•SRES 426 IS

1 (1) supports the goals and ideals of National 

2 Campus Safety Awareness Month; and 

3 (2) encourages students who are enrolled in col4 leges and universities to participate in events and 

5 awareness initiatives held during the month of Sep6 tember. 

Æ 


cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Union Tank Car Company (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Kenneth P. Fischl, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



In witness whereof, I have executed this certification as of the
14thday of November, 2005.



/s/ Kenneth P. FischlKenneth P. FischlPrincipal Executive Officer
No. 56639.

protest 22975-K (New York).

#### W. A. Cleary Corp. and W. R. Keating & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of lecithin similar in all material respects to that the subject of *United States*v. *C. J. Tower & Sons*(38 C. C. P. A. 131, C. A. D. 450), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 121 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 26, 2007 

Received and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and 

Pensions 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the benefits and importance of school-based 

music education, and for other purposes. 

Whereas school music programs enhance intellectual development and enrich the academic environment for students 

of all ages; 

Whereas students who participate in school music programs 

are less likely to be involved with drugs, gangs, or alcohol 

and have better attendance in school; 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
2 

HCON 121 RFS 

Whereas the skills gained through sequential music instruction, including discipline and the ability to analyze, solve 

problems, communicate, and work cooperatively, are vital 

for success in the 21st century workplace; 

Whereas the majority of students attending public schools in 

inner city neighborhoods have virtually no access to 

music education, which places them at a disadvantage 

compared to their peers in other communities; 

Whereas the arts are a core academic subject, and music is 

an essential element of the arts; and 

Whereas every student in the United States should have an 

opportunity to reap the benefits of music education: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that 

3 music education grounded in rigorous instruction is an im4 portant component of a well-rounded academic curriculum 

5 and should be available to every student in every school. 

Passed the House of Representatives April 25, 2007. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
No. 43084.

#### Protest 957928-G of Bullocks, Inc. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Dallingeb, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of hand blotters, paper knives, penholders, bookends, and inkstands. The claim at 40 percent under paragraph 339 was sustained on the authority of Abstracts 37730, 41273, and 42391.
(Reap. Dec. 8845)

#### Manhattan Novelty Corp. Inter Maritime Fwdg. Co., Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 31978, etc.

(Decided June 13, 1957)

*Tompkins & Tompkins*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Wilson, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule *“A,”*hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted *696for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the Plaintiff and the Assistant Attorney General for the United States, Defendant, that the reappraisement appeals listed in the attached Schedule A, which Schedule A is made a part of this stipulation, are limited to the binoculars and leather cases specified in the said attached Schedule A.

> That at the time of exportation binoculars and leather cases such as or similar to those identified in the attached Schedule A, were being freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States at the per piece prices specified in the attached Schedule A net packed, which prices were higher than the foreign values as defined in Section 402 (c), Tariff Act of 1930.

> ' The reappraisement appeals listed in the attached Schedule A are submitted for decision upon this stiupulation.

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the binoculars and leather cases specified in said attached schedule “A," and that such values were as specified in said attached schedule *“A,”*net packed.

Insofar as the appeals relate to all other merchandise, they are hereby dismissed.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
Before the First Division,

November 21, 1950

No. 54860.

#### Farrand Optical Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 149052-K (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protest.
No. 53745.

protests 131592-K, etc. (Laredo).

#### Sid Katz, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

When the case was called for trial protests 131592-K and 131593-K were abandoned. It was conceded by the Government that the boots in question were actually made by the stitch-down method rather than the welt, and it was stipulated in the case of protest 131594r-K that “there are 279 pairs of boots of the sizes 18)4 to 21, inclusive, and that those constitute youths’ sizes and are boots used chiefly by youths.” On the record presented, protests 131592-K and 131593-K, having been abandoned, were dismissed. The claim in protest 131594-K was sustained to the extent above indicated.

Cole, J., concurring.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 107 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 107

 Expressing the sense of the Congress that neither the President, the 
  Vice President, nor any Member of Congress, justice or judge of the 
 United States, or political appointee in the executive branch of the 
 Government should belong to a club that discriminates on the basis of 
                              sex or race.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2007

 Mrs. Maloney of New York (for herself, Mr. Sherman, and Mr. Rothman) 
 submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to 
 the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and in addition to 
 the Committees on House Administration and Judiciary, for a period to 
      be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for 
consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 
                          committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing the sense of the Congress that neither the President, the 
  Vice President, nor any Member of Congress, justice or judge of the 
 United States, or political appointee in the executive branch of the 
 Government should belong to a club that discriminates on the basis of 
                              sex or race.

Whereas Congress respects the right of private association;
Whereas the right of private association among friends, colleagues, and like-
        minded individuals is a deeply held American value when it is truly 
        private, but is immorally invoked when it is used as a cover for 
        discrimination;
Whereas the President, the Vice President, Members of Congress, justices and 
        judges of the United States, and political appointees in the executive 
        branch of the Government, by virtue of their public office, are 
        obligated to adhere to a higher standard of conduct than what is 
        minimally required by law, a standard of conduct that reflects the 
        American value that discrimination is wrong; and
Whereas Members of Congress and other Government officials have recognized that 
        membership in any club that discriminates is unacceptable for a public 
        official, and have consequently resigned therefrom: Now, therefore, be 
        it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This resolution may be cited as the ``Fair Play-Equal Access in 
Membership Resolution''.

SEC. 2. SENSE OF THE CONGRESS.

    It is the sense of the Congress that neither the President, the 
Vice President, nor any Member of Congress, justice or judge of the 
United States, or political appointee in the executive branch of the 
Government should belong to a club that discriminates on the basis of 
sex or race.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Central Pennsy lvania Radiation :

Oncology, P.C., a Pennsylvania :

corporation, :

Appellant :

:

v. : No. 1004 C.D. 2020

:

The Good Samaritan Hospital :

of Lebanon, Pennsylvania, a :

Pennsylvania Corporation, :

WellSpan Health, a Pennsylvania :

Corporation, and Robert Longo, :

an adult Individual :

PER CURIAM O R D E R

NOW, January 24, 2022

, having considered A ppellant ’ s application for

reargument, the application is denied.
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A20A2010. SMITH v. TIBBITTS, et al.

Upon consideration of appellee's MOTIONTODISMISSand appellant'sstated

lack of opposition to same, it is ordered that said motion be hereby GRANTED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office,

Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

September 02, 2020

09/02/2020