alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2015294EN.01003201.xml

| 7.9.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 294/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.9.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 294/32

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht München (Germany) lodged on 15 June 2015 — Medical Imaging Systems GmbH (MIS) v Hauptzollamt München

(Case C-288/15)

(2015/C 294/39)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Finanzgericht München

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Medical Imaging Systems GmbH (MIS)

Applicant:

Defendant: Hauptzollamt München

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Does classification under subheading 6211 33 10 00 0 ‘Industrial and occupational clothing’ of the Combined Nomenclature (1) depend solely on external appearance or intended use, or does General Rule 3(b) require that consideration be given to those components of the goods which give them their essential character?

1

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff (OJ 1987 L 256, p. 1), Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 927/2012 of 9 October 2012 amending Annex I (OJ 2012 L 304, p. 1).

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>              3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                          APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                            JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                    7,763,200
<SECURITIES>                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                            13,757,680
<ALLOWANCES>                                295,273
<INVENTORY>                              16,700,624
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         38,667,975
<PP&E>                                   23,874,285
<DEPRECIATION>                           15,665,276
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           54,670,970
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     8,676,128
<BONDS>                                           0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<COMMON>                                  1,141,203
<OTHER-SE>                               44,853,639
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             54,670,970
<SALES>                                  18,583,072
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         18,583,072
<CGS>                                     8,229,230
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             8,837,900
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           (159,008)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           1,674,950
<INCOME-TAX>                                553,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       1,121,950
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                              1,121,950
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   .10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   .10
        




</TABLE>
SUMMARY OF RESULTS

EPA Methods 5 & 202

Determination of Total Particulate Matter

Guardian Fiberglass

Inwood, WV

Line 1 Melter Baghouse Stack

Run Number 1 2 3 Avg

Date: 02/22/12 02/23/12 02/23/12 ---

 Net Time of Test, minutes 240 240 240 ---

Ts Test Start Time 1228 755 1210 ---

Te Test End Time 1631 1158 1612 ---

Pbar Barometric Pressure, in. Hg 29.00 28.84 28.91 28.92

Pg Static Pressure, in. Hg 0.019 0.019 0.019 0.019

PS Stack Pressure, Absolute, in. Hg 29.019 28.859 28.929 28.936

VM Actual Meter Volume Sampled, cu. ft. 164.928 158.590 165.879 163.132

 Dry Gas Meter Correction Factor 0.959 0.959 0.959 0.959

H Avg. Delta H, in. H20 1.27 1.15 1.27 1.23

TM Avg. Gas Meter Temp., Deg. F 67.7 68.3 84.1 73.4

VSTD Volume Sampled at Stand. Cond., cu. ft. 153.894 146.945 149.640 150.160

VC Volume of Water Collected, ml 61.4 54.9 59.4 58.6

VWC Volume of Water Vapor at Std. Cond.,SCF 2.89 2.59 2.80 2.76

BWS Moisture Content of Gas Stream 0.018 0.017 0.018 0.018

PMV Percent Moisture in Stack 1.8 1.7 1.8 1.8

MFD Mole Fraction of Dry Gas 0.982 0.983 0.982 0.982

Md Mole. Wt. Stack Gas, Dry Basis, lb/lb mole 29 29 29 29

MS Mole. Wt. Stack Gas, Wet Basis, lb/lb mole 28.640 28.653 28.641 28.645

Cp Pitot Tube Constant 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84

PS Avg. Sqrt. Delta P, in. H20 0.813 0.792 0.796 0.800

TS Avg. Stack Temp., Deg. F 119.3 123.9 129.0 124.1

VS Avg. Stack Velocity, ft/sec 48.7 47.8 48.2 48.3

A Area Stack, ft2 3.98 3.98 3.98 3.98

QSD Gas Volume Flow, Dry Std. Cond. CFM 10,087 9,775 9,787 9,883

QA Actual Gas Volume Flow, CFM 11,625 11,404 11,503 11,511

QSW Gas Volume Flow, Wet Std. Cond., CFM 10,277 9,947 9,970 10,065
SUMMARY OF RESULTS

EPA Methods 5 & 202

Determination of Total Particulate Matter

Guardian Fiberglass

Inwood, WV

Line 1 Melter Baghouse Stack

Run Number 1 2 3 Avg

Date: 02/22/12 02/23/12 02/23/12 ---

Dn Sample Nozzle Diameter, inches 0.214 0.212 0.214 0.213

An Area of Nozzle, ft2 0.00025 0.00025 0.00025 0.00025

I Percent Isokinetic 101.2 101.7 101.5 101.5

PPR Process Pull Rate, lbs/hr 6,822 6,827 6,827 6,825

PPRS Process Pull Rate, tons/hr 3.41 3.41 3.41 3.41

 Filterable Particulate Matter

mn Filterable Catch, mg 5.6 1.7 2.3 3.2

Cs Filterable Concentration, gr/dscf 0.0006 0.0002 0.0002 0.0003

Ca Filterable Concentration, mg/dscm 1.28 0.41 0.53 0.74

CAW Filterable Emission Rate, lbs/hr 0.048 0.015 0.019 0.028

E Filterable Emission Rate, lbs/TGP 0.014 0.004 0.006 0.008
Exhibit 35.2

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2016-1 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017 (the Report), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Santander Consumer International Puerto Rico LLC (the Subservicer), does
hereby certify and represent that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities and performance of the Subservicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of February 17, 2016, among Santander Drive Auto Receivables LLC, Santander Consumer USA Inc.,
Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2016-1 and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (the Agreement) during the period that is the subject of the Report has been made under my supervision.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | A review of the activities and performance of the Subservicer under the Servicing Agreement, dated July 15, 2016 (the Servicing Agreement), by and between Santander Consumer USA Inc. and Santander
Consumer International Puerto Rico LLC, and the related Second Amended and Restated Program Portfolio Schedule (Publicly Registered Transactions), dated as of June 28, 2017 (the Second Amended and Restated Program Portfolio Schedule, together
with the Servicing Agreement, the Subservicing Agreement), during the period that is the subject of the Report has been made under my supervision.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 3. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Subservicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement and the Subservicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the period that is the
subject of the Report.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



SANTANDER CONSUMER INTERNATIONAL PUERTO RICO LLCBy:

/s/ Jose RamirezName:

Jose RamirezTitle:

Vice President of Servicing for Santander Consumer International Puerto Rico, LLCDate:

March 30, 2018
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Consumers Financial
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2004,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Jack I. Ehrenhaus, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  the operation of the Company.


/s/ Jack I. Ehrenhaus
-------------------------------------
Jack I. Ehrenhaus
Chief Financial Officer
January 12, 2005



                                       17
In The Matter Of: 

### SERVED: April 4, 2017
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS WASHINGTON, DC 

## DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT A

TfON 2811 APR -5 

## p 3: 02 DOCKET OPERATIONS
DocketNo. FAA-2016-4267 SkywestAirlines, Inc. ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 2015WP910079 Respondent

DISMISSAL ORDER
On April3, 2017, the Complainant and the Respondent filed a JointNotice ofWithdrawal of Cases, stating that the parties hadreached a settlement inthis matter. Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. 

### § 13.215, a party may withdraw a complaint or a request for a hearing without the consent ofthe administrative lawjudge at any time before or during a hearing. Upon such withdrawal, the administrative lawjudge shall dismiss the case with prejudice.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: these proceedings are dismissed with prejudice.

Attachment: Service List DOUGLAS M. RAWALD Administrative LawJudge

### SERVICE LIST

- BY U.S. MAIL ORIGINAL & 

### ONE COPY Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000 1



### Todd C. Emerson, Respondent's Counsel 

### 444 South River Road St. George, UT 84790 TEL: 435-634-3530 FAX: 435-634-3505 ONE COPY

Jeffrey M. Harper, Complainant's Counsel 

### Federal Aviation Administration Northwest Mountain Region, ANM-7 1601 Lind Avenue Southwest Renton, W A 98057 TEL: 425-227-2161 FAX: 425-227-1007 The Honorable Douglas M. Rawald,Administrative LawJudge 

### Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-5121 StaffAssistant FAX: 202-366-7536 DocketNo. FAA-2016-4267 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was byU.S. Mail. For service in person orby expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite2W1000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                       2,536,487
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,086,853
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,765,167
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,787,591
<PP&E>                                       5,459,873
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,281,543
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              32,274,805
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,418,357
<BONDS>                                     12,626,347
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          242,964
<PREFERRED>                                  1,052,988
<COMMON>                                     6,697,407
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,894,545
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                32,274,805
<SALES>                                      3,041,117
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,041,117
<CGS>                                        2,150,587
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,150,587
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,835,020
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             922,658
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,499,461
<INCOME-TAX>                                    77,598
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,410,645
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,410,645
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .10


</TABLE>
# C_2015279EN.01001702.xml

| 24.8.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 279/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.8.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 279/17

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 13 May 2015 — Elisabeth Schmitt v TÜV Rheinland LGA Products GmbH

(Case C-219/15)

(2015/C 279/21)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesgerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Elisabeth Schmitt

Defendant: TÜV Rheinland LGA Products GmbH

Questions referred

Is it the purpose and intention of the Directive (1) that, in the case of Class III medical devices, the notified body responsible for auditing the quality system, examining the design of the product and surveillance acts in order to protect all potential patients and may therefore, in the event of a culpable infringement of an obligation, have direct and unlimited liability towards the patients concerned?

Does it follow from the aforementioned points of Annex II to Directive 93/42/EEC that, in the case of Class III medical devices, the notified body responsible for auditing the quality system, examining the design of the product and surveillance is subject to a general obligation to examine devices, or at least to examine them where there is due cause?

Does it follow from the aforementioned points of Annex II to Directive 93/42/EEC that, in the case of Class III medical devices, the notified body responsible for auditing the quality system, examining the design of the product and surveillance is subject to a general obligation to examine the manufacturer’s business records and/or to carry out unannounced inspections, or at least to do so where there is due cause?

---

(1)  Council Directive 93/42/EEC of 14 June 1993 concerning medical devices (OJ 1993 L 169, p. 1), Directive 2007/47/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 September 2007 amending Council Directive 90/385/EEC on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to active implantable medical devices, Council Directive 93/42/EEC concerning medical devices and Directive 98/8/EC concerning the placing of biocidal products on the market (OJ 2007 L 247, p. 21).

---
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 110 

Expressing the sense of Congress that Iraq should vote to approve or disapprove the continued deployment of United States Armed Forces to 

Iraq and, unless Iraq votes to approve such continued deployment, the 

President of the United States should commence the phased redeployment 

of United States Armed Forces from Iraq within 60 days of the Iraqi 

vote. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2007 

Mr. SHAYS submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred 

to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee 

on Armed Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 

Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within 

the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of Congress that Iraq should vote to 

approve or disapprove the continued deployment of 

United States Armed Forces to Iraq and, unless Iraq 

votes to approve such continued deployment, the President of the United States should commence the phased 

redeployment of United States Armed Forces from Iraq 

within 60 days of the Iraqi vote. 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that— 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
2 

•HCON 110 IH 

1 (1) the Government of Iraq should hold a vote 

2 in the Iraqi Council of Representatives or among the 

3 Iraqi general voting public to approve or disapprove 

4 the continued deployment of United States Armed 

5 Forces to Iraq; and 

6 (2) unless 60 percent of the members of the 

7 Iraqi Council of Representatives or the Iraqi general 

8 voting public vote to approve the continued deploy9 ment of United States Armed Forces to Iraq, the 

10 President of the United States should commence the 

11 phased redeployment of United States Armed Forces 

12 from Iraq within 60 days of the Iraqi vote. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
365 

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TU(AS 

OROVLR SLLLCRS 

AUSTIN 

AI?-OI)WII GCNCML 

l onorrblo Y. 1. Idrardr 

o o untAttorna~ ~ 

t1aterlA Oopnl~ 

flrtork, Fau 

bar Br. Ldmrdrt 

jart 

OplnloQ lo. o-Ts3i 

Bat Bam8rlt~ for the hnrbaad to 

Tour roquort ?or an oplnl 

utter ir u followst 

department four quartion. should 

t i8 atit& onru00884~ r0r the 

vlfo in th a l rrrotiui of the band w bar. 
louornble w. L. xdlirrd* . ?rge 2 

366 

"8Iacm under the Coaatltutloa In Texer a 

cwrried womm msr hold offlom, #he ur of oourao 

do all thiaga necesrr~ or lwident to the prop0r tx0mi8e of that right, 8p~h •~ 8fmtig 0 

bond. The genenl rule forbidding her to contmot e 118bIlIt~ vould no LEOIW prevent her mrklug l bond than it vould derq her the right to 

wk. neoerroq bonda In the pmseoutloa of aulta 

peulttod to her. In l ech inmtmcs the parer I# 

ma lnoidtmt to the right conferred, end la necerrrrI1~ Implied, If not sxpresely required, by 

the atatuto deaandlng bonds." 

In 23 Tex. Jur., ?egs 216, SW. 180, It 18 arid: 

"l'b vife's bondr executed In the ooume of 

legal proceedings to vhloh mhe ID l party, either 

olv¶,l or criminal, of ccurot, bInda her penonrlly 

vlthout rtgtrd to her husband'm joinder, for this 

Ia tn Ineldtnt to her right to lltlgstt or defeul 

in court." 

?or thI8 pronouncement severs1 ceatm ere olttd. 

Tht huabtnd mey, hwtvtr, becomo surety for his wife 

upon ruoh ofSIcIs1 bond and would bt liable 8~ suoh sumty preclstly l s ray othtp surety for eq liability of tht vlft es 

prlnolpal thereon. He 18 act raqulrtd to beoomt such surety fbr 

8ht may furnish other sureties at her option. 

ATTORh'EH GEtii OF TXXAS 

BY
No. 48716.

#### Protests 921013-G, etc., of Uddo Taormina Corp. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and *Scaramelli*v. *United States*(9 Cust. Ct. 270, C. D. 706) and Abstract 42146 the collector was directed to reliquidate the entries, allowing 21⁄2 percent in the weight of the cheese to compensate for the weight of the inedible coverings.
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

No. 19

- 11305 Conference Calendar

**United States of America,**
Plaintiff

— Appellee **,**

versus

**Adan Bustos**

**- Barron,** 
Defendant

— Appellant

**.**

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:17

- CR

- 237

- 1

Before **Davis, Elrod,** and **Oldham,** Circuit Judges

**. Per Curiam**  **:** *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Adan Bustos

Barron has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Bustos

- Barron has not f iled a response. We have

* Pursuant to **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED June 10, 2021 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 19-11305 Document: 00515895633 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/10/2021No. 19

- 11305

2 reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is **GRANTED** , counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the **APPEAL IS DISMISSED**

. See **5th Cir. R.**  42.2

. Case: 19-11305 Document: 00515895633 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/10/2021