alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case No. 14,696.

#### UNITED STATES v. BIRCH.

11 Cranch, C. C. 571.] 1

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

Nov. Term, 1809.

Witness — Prosecutor — Liability for Costs— Selling Liquor without License— Sale by Wipe.

1. The prosecutrr, whose name is indorsed on the indictment for a misdemeanor, is not a competent witness for the prosecution.

2. A selling by the wife with the assent of the husband, is a selling by the husband; The day is not material.

Indictment for selling spirituous liquors without license.

Alexander Simms, the prosecutor, whose name was indorsed on the indictment, was offered by the United States, as a witness.

*1148E. J. Lee, for defendant

[James BirchJ. objected that he was interested; being liable to pay the costs, according to the act of Virginia of November 13, 1792, § 25, p. 105.

Mr. Jones.

It is every-day’s practice in England to examine prosecutors.

THE COURT

said that the interest was direct and that the witness was incompetent.

E. J. Lee contended that evidence that the defendant’s wife sold, is not evidence that the defendant sold, and that the day must be proved as laid.

THE COURT said, if the selling by the wife was with the assent of the husband, it is to be considered as the selling by the husband.

Mr. Lee abandoned the point as to the day.

But THE COURT thought the day was not material.
No. 44202.

#### Protest 841751-G (A) of American Straw Goods Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Bbown J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of bodies, hoods, forms, or shapes similar to.that the subject of *Cohn*v. *United States*(4 Cust. Ct. 166, C. D. 314). The protest was sustained accordingly.
SCWC-20-0000036

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

 

JAMES JONATHON DRISCOLL aka JAMES JONATHAN DRISCOLL,

GEORGE M. KAIMIOLA and ZILPAH K. KAIMIOLA,

Respondents/Plaintiffs-Appellees,

and

ALLEN B. ARAKAWA, and DEBBIE E. ARAKAWA,

Petitioners/Plaintiffs-Appellants,

vs.

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS,

INC., GEORGE MATIC, MILENA MATIC, ALEKSANDRA O. MATIC,

STEVEN MATIC, SIMON T. NGAN, JILL S.A. NGAN, AMERICAN SAVINGS BANK,

F.S.B., JASON C. BALBERDI, NAHINU R. FREITAS, and

THE FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK,

Respondents/Defendants-Appellees.

 

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(CAAP-20-0000036; CIV. NO. 2CC191000167(1))

ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

AND DENYING REQUEST FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, and Wilson, JJ.,

and Circuit Judge Wong, in place of Pollack, J., recused)

Upon consideration of petitioners’ application for writ

of certiorari or, in the alternative, a writ of mandamus, filed

on June 3, 2020, respondents Bank of America, N.A. and Mortgage

Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.’s response, filed on July

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-20-0000036

03-AUG-2020

08:17 AM
6, 2020, petitioners’ reply, filed on July 13, 2020, the

respective supporting documents, and the record, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the application for writ of

certiorari is rejected. 

IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that to the extent

petitioners are seeking a writ of mandamus, their request is

denied.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, August 3, 2020.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

/s/ Paul B.K. Wong

2
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 2017/2005

of 8 December 2005         

establishing a prohibition of fishing for redfish in NAFO zone 3M by vessels flying the flag of a Member State

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 2371/2002 of 20 December 2002 on the conservation and sustainable exploitation of fisheries resources under the Common Fisheries Policy (1), and in particular Article 26(4) thereof,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2847/93 of 12 October 1993 establishing a control system applicable to common fisheries policy (2), and in particular Article 21(3) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Quota exhaustion

The fishing quota allocated to the Member States referred to in the Annex to this Regulation for the stock referred to therein for 2005 shall be deemed to be exhausted from the date set out in that Annex.

Article 2

Prohibitions

Fishing for the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation by vessels flying the flags of or registered in the Member States referred to therein shall be prohibited from the date set out in that Annex. It shall be prohibited to retain on board, tranship or land such stock caught by those vessels after that date.

Article 3

Entry into force

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 8 December 2005.

For the Commission

Jörgen HOLMQUIST            

Director-General for Fisheries and Maritime Affairs

----

(1)OJ L 358, 31.12.2002, p 59.

(2)OJ L 261, 20.10.1993, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 768/2005 (OJ L 128, 21.5.2005, p. 1).

(3)OJ L 12, 14.1.2005, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1936/2005 (OJ L 311, 26.11.2005, p. 1).

----

ANNEX

----
# C_2015146EN.01001701.xml

| 4.5.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 146/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.5.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 146/17

---

Appeal brought on 20 February 2015 by the Council of the European Union against the judgment delivered by the General Court (Second Chamber) on 17 December 2014 in Case T-400/10 Hamas v Council

(Case C-79/15 P)

(2015/C 146/25)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Council of the European Union (represented by: B. Driessen, G. Étienne, acting as Agents)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: Hamas, European Commission

Other parties to the proceedings:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The appellant claims that the Court should:

| — | set aside the judgment of the General Court in Case T-400/10; |
| --- | --- |

—

set aside the judgment of the General Court in Case T-400/10;

| — | give final judgment in the matters that are the subject of this appeal;
  and |
| --- | --- |

—

give final judgment in the matters that are the subject of this appeal;

and

| — | order the applicant in Case T-400/10 to pay the costs incurred by the Council at first instance and in this appeal. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the applicant in Case T-400/10 to pay the costs incurred by the Council at first instance and in this appeal.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of its appeal, the appellant raises the following pleas in law.

First, the appellant submits that the General Court erred in law in its assessment of the use by the Council of information in the public domain for the periodic review of the measures adopted.

Secondly, the appellant submits that the General Court erred in law in not concluding that the decisions of the competent authorities of the United States of America on the one hand and of the United Kingdom on the other constituted a sufficient basis to include Hamas on the list.

---
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, John C. Lawrence, President, and Chief Executive Officer of United States
Antimony Corporation (the "Company") do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to my knowledge:

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended
June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







/s/ John C. Lawrence                                 Date:   August 21, 2007
--------------------------------------                    ----------------------
John C. Lawrence
President and Chief Executive Officer
# C_2017053EN.01001601.xml

| 20.2.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 53/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.2.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 53/16

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 21 December 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Berlin — Germany) — Sidika Ucar (C-508/15), Recep Kilic (C-509/15) v Land Berlin

(Joined Cases C-508/15 and C-509/15) (1)

1

((References for a preliminary ruling - EEC-Turkey Association Agreement - Decision No 1/80 - Article 7, first paragraph - Right of residence of family members of a Turkish worker duly registered as belonging to the labour force of a Member State - Conditions - No need for the Turkish worker to be duly registered as belonging to the labour force of a Member State for the first three years of the residence of a family member))

(2017/C 053/18)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Verwaltungsgericht Berlin

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Sidika Ucar (C-508/15), Recep Kilic (C-509/15)

Applicants:

Defendant: Land Berlin

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 7, first paragraph, first indent, of Decision No 1/80 of the Association Council of 19 September 1980 on the development of the Association must be interpreted as meaning that that provision confers a right of residence in the host Member State on a family member of a Turkish worker, who has been authorised to enter that Member State, for the purposes of family reunification, and who, from his entry into the territory of that Member State, has lived with that Turkish worker, even if the period of at least three years during which the latter is duly registered as belonging to the labour force does not immediately follow the arrival of the family member concerned in the host Member State, but is subsequent to it.

---

(1)  OJ C 16, 18.1.2016.

1

---
US	Department	of	Transportation

UAS	FAA	Exemption	Request

Aerial Playground LLC

Marcus Batton & Lance Smith

3950 North Creasy Springs Road

Columbia, Mo 65202

573-268-0497

marcus.batton@melbeat.com.com

All following request and subject matter is regarding a DJI S1000 Octocopter, a Professional Aerial 

platform owned and operated by Aerial Playground LLC. Aerial Playground is Co-Owned by Marcus 

Batton & Lance Smith. UAS system specifications are attached in package.

Request for exemption of air worthiness certification form FAA. Due to the size, manufacturing process 

and assembly by DJI trained technician in the US and the lack of flammables or person on board along 

with built in safety features such as auto land to point of takeoff in the event that communication is lost 

and the ability to stay in flight in the event a single motor is lost. Not to mention that the use of this 

system will be in a closed commercial, TV, Motion, Picture or private property environment with line of 

sight, under 400 feet.

These exemption requests are similar to Grant of Exemption No. 11062 and would like for you to take 

that in to consideration please.

Request for exemption from, 14 CFR §§ 61.113(a) and (b); 91.119(c); 91.121; 91.151(a); 91.405(a); 

91.407(a)(l); 91.409(a)(1) and (2); and 91.417(a) and (b) to the extent necessary to allow Aerial 

Playground LLC with pilot to operate UAS for the purpose of scripted, closed-set filming for the motion 

picture and television industry. Extend these exemptions to flight over personal property for mapping 

purposes of said property; home, farm or ranch at the request of the property owner. All line of sight with 

a ceiling under 400 feet and a spotter.

Allowing these exemptions will increase the safety to the public and individuals working on set along 

with material equipment in its proximity due to the nature of the UAS and how it operates. No fuel or 

flammable liquids or solids will be flown overhead or be stored on the ground.

Aerial Playgroud LLC will also be offering my services to law enforcement in surrounding small towns.

Typically small towns do not have the budget to own or have a UAS on hand to do search and rescue. 

Aerial Playground history, Co-Owner Marcus Batton has been working 15 + years in the film business. 

He has flown aerial balloons for lighting large areas. He is Fischer certified on the Model 11. Lance Smith 

has been in the film business for the past five years and has been using Radio controlled vehicles for 10+ 

years. Aerial Playground has been flying for two years and have logged hundreds of hours on all UAV.

Attached is a copy of the application I just submitted to register this vehicle with the FAA. UAS S 1000 

specifications and photos

Thank You
Aerial Playground LLC

Marcus Batton & Lance Smith
# Official Journal L 176/2021

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 176 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6419 May 2021 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 176

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6419 May 2021

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/797 of 8 March 2021 correcting certain language versions of Annex II and Annex VI to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Decision (EU) 2021/798 of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States of 21 April 2021 appointing two Judges and two Advocates-General to the Court of Justice | 3 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/797 of 8 March 2021 correcting certain language versions of Annex II and Annex VI to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures (
  1
  )

1

1

DECISIONS

*

Decision (EU) 2021/798 of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States of 21 April 2021 appointing two Judges and two Advocates-General to the Court of Justice

3

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
# Official Journal C 321A/11 S

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 321A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6111 September 2018 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 321A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6111 September 2018

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | Corrigenda |
| 2018/C 321 A/01 | Corrigendum to notice of open competition — EPSO/AST-SC/07/18 — Armed security and protection officers (SC 1/SC 2) ( OJ C 305 A, 30.8.2018 ) | 1 |

Contents

page

Corrigenda

2018/C 321 A/01

Corrigendum to notice of open competition — EPSO/AST-SC/07/18 — Armed security and protection officers (SC 1/SC 2) ( OJ C 305 A, 30.8.2018 )

( OJ C 305 A, 30.8.2018 )

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN

---

Corrigenda

| 11.9.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 321/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.9.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 321/1

---

Corrigendum to notice of open competition — EPSO/AST-SC/07/18 — Armed security and protection officers (SC 1/SC 2)

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 305 A of 30 August 2018
  )

(2018/C 321 A/01)

On page 8, Annex II:

| for: | ‘1. | Professional experience of at least 3 years and obtained over the last 6 years, in the field of armed protection/intervention within governmental, national and/or international public security services, including within private security companies providing services for international public organisations, permanent representations or diplomatic missions. To be taken into account, this experience must be in addition to the experience required to access the competition.’, |
| --- | --- | --- |

for:

‘1.

Professional experience of at least 3 years and obtained over the last 6 years, in the field of armed protection/intervention within governmental, national and/or international public security services, including within private security companies providing services for international public organisations, permanent representations or diplomatic missions. To be taken into account, this experience must be in addition to the experience required to access the competition.’,

| read: | ‘1. | Professional experience of at least 3 years and obtained over the last 8 years, in the field of armed protection/intervention within governmental, national and/or international public security services. To be taken into account, this experience must be in addition to the experience required to access the competition.’. |
| --- | --- | --- |

read:

‘1.

Professional experience of at least 3 years and obtained over the last 8 years, in the field of armed protection/intervention within governmental, national and/or international public security services. To be taken into account, this experience must be in addition to the experience required to access the competition.’.

---
Before the Third Division,

October 26, 1945

No. 50620.

#### Protests 958936-G, etc., of B. Shackman & Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the figures are similar in all material inspects to the merchandise the subject of *Joseph Schmidt, Inc.*v. *United States*(9 Cust. Ct. 188, C. D. 690), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
<DOCUMENT>

<TYPE>  EX-12

<TEXT>

<HTML>



Exhibit 12







United Air Lines, Inc. and Subsidiary Companies



Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges





|                                                 | Nine Months Ended
|------------------------------------------------ | -----------------
|                                                 | September 30     
|                                                 |                  
|                                                 | 2000             
|                                                 | (In Millions)    
|Earnings:                                        |                  
|Earnings before income taxes, extraordinary item |                  
|and cumulative effect of accounting change       | $    563         
|Fixed charges, from below                        | 788              
|Undistributed (earnings) losses of affiliates    | 4                
|Interest capitalized                             | (57)             
|                                                 |                  
|Earnings                                         | $ 1,298          
|                                                 | =====            
|                                                 |                  
|Fixed charges:                                   |                  
|                                                 |                  
|Interest expense                                 | $    304         
|Portion of rental expense representative         |                  
|of the interest factor                           | 484              
|                                                 |                  
|Fixed charges                                    | $   788          
|                                                 | =====            
|                                                 |                  
|Ratio of earnings to fixed charges               | 1.65             
|                                                 | =====            
|                                                 |                  
|                                                 |                  

</HTML>

</TEXT>

</DOCUMENT>
KarenHays,ChiefUNITEDSTATESENVIRONMENTALPROTECTIONAGENCYREGION4ATLANTAFEDERALCENTER61FORSYTHSTREETATLANTA,GEORGIA30303·8960October22,2015GeorgiaEnvironmentalProtectionDivisionAirProtectionBranch4244InternationalParkwaySuite120AtlantaGeorgia30354-3906DearMs.Hays:ThankyoufortherecommendationsthatyouragencysentusonSeptember14,2015,regardingtheattainmentstatusforselectedareasintheStateofGeorgiaunderthe2010sulfurdioxide(S02)nationalambientairqualitystandard(NAAQS).Asyouknow,wearesubjecttoaMarch2,2015,courtorderdirectingustopromulgateS02designationsfortheseareasundersection107oftheCleanAirAct(CAA)byJuly2,2016.Specifically,wearerequiredtopromulgatedesignationsfortheseareasbecausetheycontainsourcesmeetingtheS02emissionscriteriaidentifiedintheconsentdecree.TheinformationyouprovidedonSeptember14,2015,willgreatlyhelpusmeetthisduty,andensureprotectionofpublichealthintheStateofGeorgia.Inadditiontoyourupdatedrecommendation,wehaverecentlyreceivedmodelingandrelatedinformationfromtheSierraClubthatisrelevanttoasubsetoftheareastobeaddressedbyJuly2,2016.Inyourstate,wehavereceivedinformationpertinenttotheareaneartheRobertW.SchererPowerPlantinMonroeCounty,Georgia.TheCAAprovidesfordesignationstobedevelopedthroughapartnershipofstateagenciesandtheU.S.EnvironmentalProtectionAgency,howeverwealsobelieveitisimportanttoconsidersignificantandrelevantinformationthatmembersofthepublicprovidetous.ConsistentwiththestructureoftheCAA,webelievethatthebestfirststepinaddressingthisinformationistounderstandyouragency'sreviewoftheinformation.WeunderstandyoualsoreceivedinformationdirectlyfromSierraClubandconductedareviewoftheelementsoftheiranalysis.Furthermore,weacknowledgethatyourSeptember14,2015,updatedrecommendationsprovidesasummaryofyourreviewincludingaquantitativecomparisonsofdatausedinSierraClub'sanalysiscomparedtothedatausedinyouranalysis.Thiscomparisonwillhelpusevaluatetheelementsofthetwoanalyses.Yourreviewprovidesusvaluableassistanceinourassessmentofyourdesignationrecommendationsandthedevelopmentofourintendeddesignations,whichweareaimingtocompletebytheendofJanuary2016.InternetAddress(URL)•hUp://www.epa.govRecycled/Recyclable•PrintedwithVegetableOilBasedInksonRecycledPaper(Minimum30%Postconsumer)Wewillpublishnoticeofourintendeddesignationsforpubliccomment,and,asrequiredbytheCAA,promulgatefmaldesignationsnosoonerthan120daysaftergivingyounoticeofthem.Pleasecontactme,orhaveyourstaffcontactTwunjalaBradley(404-562-9325)orRickGillamat(404-562-9049)ifyouhaveanyquestionsabouttheinformationwehavereceivedorifyouneedanyadditionalinformation.cc:JamesBoylan,ProgramManager,GAEPDElizabethMunsey,GAEPDSincerely.R.ScottDavisChiefAirPlanningandImplementationBranch