P.3 

13 

• • M *^m 

W^" 

Tuesday 

July 10, 1990 

Part II 

Environmental 

Protection Agency 

40 CFR Part 61 

National Emission Standards for 

Hazardous Air Pollutants; Revisions to 

Vinyl Chloride; Equipment Leaks of 

Volatile Hazardous Air Pollutants; Final 

Rule 

V 
P.2 

'*/ 

Federal Register / Vol. 55. No. 132 / Tuesday, July 10, 1990 / Rules and Regulations 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCV 

40 CFR Part SH 

IFRL-3752-3] 

National Emission Standards for 

Hazardous Air Pollutants; Revisions fo 

Vinyl Chloride; Equipment Leaks of 

Volatile Hazardous Air Pollutants 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: On September 21.1989 (54 FR 

38938), EPA proposed minor revisions to 

national emission standards for vinyl 

chloride (VC) and equipment leaks of 

volatile hazardous air pollutants. The 

revisions to the national emission 

standards for hazardous air pollutants 

(NESHAP) were proposed as a result of 

petitions for reconsideration and review 

filed by the Society of the Plastics 

Industry, Inc. (SPI), Dow Chemical 

Company, Georgia Gulf Corporation, 

and Vista Chemical Company. This 

action promulgates final revisions to the 

NESHAP. The intended effect of this 

action is to grant the petitioners' request 

for clarification of ambiguities in several 

definitions and in the applicability of 

certain regulatory requirements in the 

standards. 

This notice is not intended to address 

the July 28,1987, decision by the D.C. 

Circuit Court on the VC standards. 

Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. 

v. EPA, 824 F.2d 1146 (1987). Any 

response to that decision will be made 

in a future notice in the Federal Register. 

DATES: Effective Date: July 10,1990. 

Judicial Review. Under section 

307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, judicial 

review of NESHAP is available only by 

filing a petition for review in the U.S. 

Court of Appeals for the District of 

Columbia Circuit on or before 

September 10,1990. Under section 

307(b)(2) of the Clean Air Act, the 

requirements that are the subject of 

today's notice may not be challenged 

later in civil or criminal proceedings 

brought by EPA to enforce these 

requirements. 

ADDRESSES: Docket. A docket, number 

A-81-21, containing information 

considered by EPA in the development 

of the promulgated standards and the 

petitions for reconsideration, to which 

this notice is responding, is available for 

public inspection between 8:30 a.m. and 

3:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, at 

EPA's Air Docket Section (LE-131), 

Room M1500, First Floor, 401 M Street 

SW., Washington, DC 20460. A 

reasonable fee may be charged for 

copying. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

For further information and 

interpretations of applicability, 

compliance requirements, and reporting 

aspects of the revised standards, contact 

the appropriate Regional, State, or local 

office contact as listed in 40 CFR 60.4. 

For further information on the 

background for the final revised 

standards, contact Ms. Shirley Tabler, 

Standards Development Branch, 

Emission Standards Division (MD-13), 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 

Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 

27711, telephone, (919) 541-5256. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Background 

In December, 1975, EPA designated 

VC as a hazardous air pollutant under 

section 112 of the Clean Air Act (42 

U.S.C. 7412) and promulgated final rules 

for VC on October 21,1976 (40 CFR 

61.60-61.71). The standards limit 

emissions of VC from plants producing 

ethylene dichloride (EDC) via 

oxychlorination, VC, and polyvinyl 

chloride (PVC) or other polymers 

containing VC. These plants are subject 

to a combination of emission limits, 

equipment, and work practice 

requirements at numerous points in the 

manufacturing processes. 

On September 30,1986 (51 FR 34904). 

EPA promulgated several administrative 

and clarifying revisions to the national 

emission standard for VC. Subsequently, 

on November 26,1986, SPI filed with 

EPA a petition for stay and 

administrative reconsideration of seven 

provisions in the final revisions to the 

VC standard. The SPI, Dow Chemical 

Company, Georgia Gulf Corporation, 

and Vista Chemical Company 

concurrently filed a petition for review 

of several provisions of the revised 

standard with the U.S. Court of Appeals 

for the D.C. Circuit. The petitioners 

asserted that without adequate notice, 

EPA's 1986 revisions changed key 

provisions of the VC standard in a 

manner that: (1) violated case law; (2) 

imposed new penalties; (3) created 

multiple penalties for the same event; 

and (4) expanded the types of equipment 

subject to the standard. 

In summary, the petitioners requested 

review of the definitions of "exhaust 

gas," "relief valve discharge," "leak," 

"3-hour period," and "ethylene 

dichloride purification"; the scope of the 

relief valve discharge provisions; and 

the leak detection and elimination 

provisions (area monitoring). The SPI 

also requested that EPA issue a stay of 

the 1986 revisions to the VC standard 

pending review of those revised 

provisions. 

The revisions proposed on September 

21,1989, were in regard to clarifications 

to the definitions. No changes, however, 

were made with regard to fixed area 

monitoring requirements or the relief 

valve discharge standard. In the 1989 

proposal preamble, EPA also denied the 

petitioner's request for a stay of the 1986 

revised provisions. A detailed 

discussion of the issues presented in the 

petitions for review and EPA's response 

to the issues is contained in the 

preamble for the proposed revisions (54 

FR 38938-38942). 

II. Public Participation 

The proposed revisions to the 

NESHAP were published in the Federal 

Register on September 21,1989 (54 FR 

38938). A public hearing was scheduled 

on October 18,1989. However, there 

were no requests for a hearing. The 

public comment period lasted from 

September 21,1989 to November 20, 

1989. Two comment letters were 

received from the industry, both of 

which had filed petitions for review of 

the 1986 revisions. Both commenters 

expressed their support of the proposed 

revised provisions of September 21, 

1989, and stated that the revised 

provisions respond to the concerns filed 

in their petitions for review. The 

commenters did not request any 

additional changes to the NESHAP. 

III. The Promulgated Revisions 

The clarifying revisions being 

promulgated today are identical to those 

proposed on September 21,1989. The 

following is a summary of the 

promulgated revisions. 

A. The definition of "exhaust gas" has 

been modified by adding two sentences 

which clarify that a leak is not an 

exhaust gas, and that equipment 

containing exhaust gas must comply 

with the leak detection and prevention 

provisions (§ 61.65(b)(8)), whether or not 

that equipment contains 10 percent by 

volume VC. This addition assures that 

leaks from exhaust gas streams are 

subject to the leak detection and 

elimination requirements, but that such 

leaks will not also be classified as 

"exhaust gas." 

B. Minor revisions were made to the 

definition of "relief valve discharge" 

and to the relief valve discharge (RVD) 

provisions (§ 61.65(a)) to clarify that an 

RVD routed to a properly designed and 

operated control device would be 

exempted from the provisions of the 

RVD standard. This change prevents 

misinterpretation of the regulatory 
P.4 

.-s^" 

.Federa l Register / Vol. 55, No. 132 / Tuesday, July 10, 1990 / Rules and Regulations 28347 

requirements and imposition of a double 

penalty. 

In addition, new provisions 

(§ 61.65(d)) have been added for an RVD 

that is ducted to a control device that is 

continually operating while emissions 

from the release are present at the 

device. An RVD that is ducted to a 

control device, other than a flare, would 

be subject to the 10 ppm limit and the 

continuous emission monitoring system 

requirement contained in § 61.68 and to 

the reporting requirements of § 61.70. In 

the case of flares, emission monitoring is 

not possible. Therefore, for RVD's 

routed to a flare, the design 

requirements for flares (40 CFR 60.18) 

would apply. The EPA recognizes that 

measurement of relief valve discharge 

volumetric flow rates and gas stream 

composition is not possible using the 

methods set forth in § 60.18 (f)(3) and 

(f)(4). Estimates of these parameters 

will, therefore, need to be based on 

empirical or other bases, subject to EPA 

approval. Flare operations would be 

monitored in accordance with the 

requirements of §§ 60.18(d) and 

60.18(f)(2). For the purpose of § 60.18(d). 

the volume and component 

concentration of each RVD would be 

estimated and calculations would be 

made to verify ongoing compliance with 

the design and operating requirements 

of § 60.18 (c)(3) through (c)(6). If more 

than one relief valve is discharged 

simultaneously to a single flare, these 

calculations would account for the 

cumulative effect on all such RVD's. If 

the results of the monitoring contained 

in § 60.18(f)(2) or any other information 

show that the pilot flame is not present 

100 percent of the time during which an 

RVD is routed to a flare, the RVD is 

subject to the provisions of § 61.65(a). A 

report describing the flare design must 

be provided to the Administrator not 

later than 90 days after the adoption of 

this provision or within 30 days of the 

installation of a flare system for control 

of RVD's, whichever is later. 

C. The standards for pumps in VC 

service (§ 61.242-2(d)) were revised to 

clarify the requirements for pump seal 

drips. Section 61.242-2(d)(4) addresses 

drips from pump seals that contain VC, 

and § 61.242-2(d)(6) addresses drips 

from pump seals that do not contain VC. 

The final revised provisions of 

§ 61.242-2(d) are designed to accomplish 

two purposes. One is to ensure that VC 

leaks from pump seals are detected and 

eliminated. This is accomplished by 

paragraphs (d)(4) (i), (ii), and (iii). The 

other purpose is to identify and prevent 

pump seal failures by causing abnormal 

dripping (even when VC is not 

contained in the dripping liquid) to be 

detected and repairs to be made. This is 

accomplished by paragraphs (d)(6) (i), 

(iii), and (iv). These paragraphs require 

the facility owner or operator to 

establish criteria associated with normal 

operation. 

The intent of the final provisions is 

identical to the existing provision. The 

difference is that the promulgated 

provisions of § 61.242-2(d)(6)(i) allow an 

owner or operator to take into account 

the small number of liquid drips that 

may occur when new seals are in place 

or are otherwise associated with normal 

operation. 

D. The definition of "3-hour period" 

has been revised to ensure that a single 

event of 1-hour or less at 10 ppm or 

greater could result in no more than a 

single violation of the exhaust gas 

standard. A phrase has been added to 

the definition of "3-hour period" in 

§ 61.51(z) to accomplish this. The EPA 

did not intend to penalize a plant three 

times whenever a 10 ppm event occurs 

within 1 hour. Rather, EPA wanted to 

ensure that a combination of two or 

more 10 ppm events which would result 

in a 3-hour exceedance do not go 

unpenalized just because they occurred 

over two separate 3-hour "blocks." The 

promulgated revised definition of "3-

hour period" satisfies EPA's intent 

without unintentionally subjecting a 

plant owner or operator to multiple 

violations. 

E. The definition of "EDC purification" 

has been revised to clarify that 

emissions from crude, intermediate, and 

final storage tanks following EDC 

formation are not subject to the exhaust 

gas standard. (The 1986 revisions 

exempted only final storage tanks.) In 

addition, § 61.65(b)(6), Opening of 

equipment, has also been revised to 

clarify that the requirements in this 

section do not apply to crude, 

intermediate, or final EDC storage tanks. 

As stated in the proposal preamble, the 

regulation of these storage tanks is 

unnecessary because emissions are 

extremely low. 

F. In addition to the changes made in 

response to the petitions for 

reconsideration, a minor clarification 

has been made in g 61.68, Emission 

monitoring. Since it is obvious that 

paragraph (a) of § 61.68 calls for the 

monitoring of the emissions from 

prescribed sources for vinyl chloride 

and not ambient air sampling as 

required under § 61.65(b)(8) for leak 

detection/elimination, § 61.68(b) has 

been clarified to require that 

representative (not air) samples from 

one or more applicable emission points 

be obtained and analyzed. This 

promulgated revision more accurately 

reflects the original intent. 

IV. Administrative Requirements 

A. Docket 

The docket is an organized and 

complete file of all the information 

submitted to or otherwise considered by 

EPA in the development of this 

rulemaking. The docketing system is 

intended to allow members of the public 

and industries involved to readily 

identify and locate documents so that 

they can effectively participate in the 

rulemaking process. Along with the 

statement of basis and purpose of the 

proposed and promulgated revisions, 

and EPA responses to significant 

comments, the contents of the docket, 

except for interagency review materials, 

will serve as the record in case of 

judicial review (sec. 307(d)(7)(A)). 

B. Paperwork Reduction Act 

There are no additional information 

collection requirements associated with 

this rulemaking. 

C. Executive Order 12291 

Under Executive Order 12291, EPA 

must judge whether a regulatory action 

is "major" and, therefore, subject to the 

requirement of a regulatory impact 

analysis. This final rulemaking is not 

major because it makes minor clarifying 

revisions to an existing regulation and, 

therefore, results in none of the 

significant adverse economic effects 

described in the Order. 

This rulemaking was submitted to the 

Office of Management and Budget 

(OMB) for review as required by 

Executive Order 12291. Any written 

comments from OMB to EPA and any 

EPA response to those comments are 

included in Docket No. A-81-21. The 

docket is available for public inspection 

at EPA's Air Docket Section that is 

listed under the ADDRESSES section of 

this notice. 

D. Regulatory Flexibility Act 

The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 

U.S.C. 601 et seq.) requires the 

identification of potentially adverse 

impacts of Federal regulations upon 

small business entities. The Act 

specifically requires the completion of a 

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis in those 

instances where small business impacts 

are possible. Because these minor 

revisions impose no adverse economic 

impacts, a Regulatory Flexibility 

Analysis has not been conducted. 

Pursuant to the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 

605(b), I hereby certify that the final rule 

will not have a significant economic 
P.5 

FssSeral Esgiste / Vc" Tuaoday, July 10, 1990 / Rules and Regulations. 

impact on a substantial numbs? cf end ! 

entities. 

List of Subjects im m CFS Part 01 

Air pollution control, Asbestos, 

Benzene, Beryllium, Coke oven 

emissions, Hazardous substances, 

Incorporations by reference, Inorganic; 

arsenic. Intergovernmental rskl'or.o, 

Mercury, Radionuclides, Reporting cid 

recordkeeping requirements, Vinyl 

chloride, Volatile hazardous eir 

pollutants. 

Dated: July 3,19S0. 

William K. Reilly, 

Administrator. 

For the reasons set forth in the 

preamble, 40 CFR part 61 is emended EJ 

follows: 

• PART ®1—[AMENDED] 

1. The authority citation for part 61 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: Sees. 101,112,114,116, 291, 

Clean Air Act as emended (42 U.S.C. 7431. 

7412, 7414, 7416, 7601). 

2. Section 61.61 is amended by 

revising paragraphs (o), (w), (x), (y), and 

(z) to read as follows: 

§ 61.61 DaflniSt®ros. 

O O t, i, o 

(0) Ethylene dichloride purification 

includes any part of the process of 

ethylene dichloride purification 

following ethylene dichloride formnticri, 

but excludes crude, intermediate, end 

final ethylene dichloride storage teniss. 

o tt tt a o 

(w) Leak means any of severe! everts 

that indicate interruption of confinamEr.t 

of vinyl chloride within process 

equipment. Leeks include events 

regulated under subpart V of this pert 

such as: 

(1) An instrument reading of 10.C30 

ppm or greater measured according to 

Method 21 (see appendix A cf £0 CFR 

part 60); 

(2) A sensor detection of failure of a 

seal system, failure of a barrier fluid 

system, or both; 

(3) Detectable emissions es indicated 

by an instrument reading of greater ther. 

500 ppm above background for 

equipment designated for no dstectsb'.3 

emissions measured according to Test 

Method 21 (see appendix A cf bC CFH 

part 60); and 

(4) In the case of pump seels ?3[-id?.?cd 

under § 61.242-2, indications cf liqr.id 

dripping constituting e leak undar 

§ 61.242-2. 

Leaks also include svsnts regulated 

under % 61.35(b)(8)(i) for detection cf 

ambient concentrations in excess of 

besivTwur.si concentrations. A relief 

VE.1V.) ;bb;:;bcr£3 io zzi a leak. 

{}•) HrhotmSl £GS msans any offgas (the 

constituents cf which may consist of any 

fluids, cither as c. liquid and/or gas) 

discharged directly or ultimately to the 

nimo?phere that was initially contained 

in sr r.~o ix. direct contact with the 

aquipi'.enl fi? which gas limits are 

;p;-esc'-iii:b b; 3g 31.62(e) and (b); 

Sl.emcb U.2C felbi), (b), (c), and (d); 

31.35 fe)- bjiin, {bj[Xt, (b)(3), (b)(5), 

:b)(8)[i !, ;b)['7j, end (b)(9)(ii); and 

31.S5[dj. .A Issk ao defined in paragraph 

^ivj cf Lais section is not an exhaust gas. 

Equipment which contains exhaust gas 

ic SU'OJE:;"; to 0 31.35(b)(8), whether or not 

that cccipjr.ent contains 10 percent by 

volume . ir.y! chloride. 

(y) Ri:J.vJf valvs discharge means any 

non'.eeb dlcchcrgs through a relief valve. 

{z) :!-h.:urperiod izieam any three 

consecutive I-hour periods (each 

coiur"i.—;ir.3 on the hour), provided that 

tbe :.:_:: ::b~r cf S-hcv.r periods during 

whicb. "LVJ vinyS cilcride concentration 

axecj b.E13 pp3i ice s not exceed the 

nunibs? cf b-haui' periods during which 

the v'.rf. nb'.oilda concentration exceeds 

IC ppm. 

S. Section 31.25 is emended by 

r3viuli:g ^aragrspha (a) and (b)(6) 

antroductciy text, end adding paragraph 

Jd) ts raad cs follows: 

2 Qt.SG i;^:cc!©K oCcftder^ tar ethylon© 

CsKsrKo, \ynyt efstertiJa and polyvinyl 

oooo o 

{&} Relief valve discharge. Except for 

an emergency reJief discharge, and 

except rs provided in § 61.65(d), there is 

to be nc discharge to the atmosphere 

fron:. er>y raiief veive on any equipment 

in vinyl chtorids service. An emergency 

relief discharge means a discharge 

which could not have been avoided by 

taking cnecsures to prevent the 

discharge. Within 10 days of any relief 

val vs discharge, except for those subject 

to 8 21.£S(dj, the owner or operator of 

the scares from which the relief valve 

discharge occurs shall submit to the 

Administrator a report in writing 

contr.fcing irifcnr.stion on the source, 

nature and caucs cf the discharge, the 

date end tins cf the discharge, the 

approxhr.etc total vinyl chloride loss 

during the discharge, the method used 

for determining the vinyl chloride loss 

(the calculation cf the vinyl chloride 

ioss), tha cctlcn thst was taken to 

prevent the dirr.herge, and measures 

edoitcb tc prevcr.) future discharges. 

(b) ' • » 

'£) Opening of equipment. Vinyl 

chicridc SX:3E:C:ID from opening of 

equ'crr.ent 'excluding crude, 

intermediate, and final EDC storage 

tanks, but including prepolymerization 

reactors used in the manufacture of bulk 

resins and loading or unloading lines 

that are not opened to the atmosphere 

after each loading or unloading 

operation) are to be minimized follows: 

* * * O tt 

(d) A RVD that is ducted to a control 

device that is continually operating 

while emissions from the release are 

present at the device ia subject to the 

following requirements: 

(1) A discharge from a control device 

other than a flare shall not exceed 10 

ppm (average over a 3-hour period) as 

determined by the continuous emission 

monitor system required under § 31.68. 

Such a discharge is subject to the 

requirements of § 61.70. 

(2) For a discharge routed to a flare, 

the flare shall comply with the 

requirements of § 60.18. 

(i) Flare operations shall be monitored 

in accordance with the requirements of 

§§ 60.18(d) and 60.18(f)(2). For the 

purposes of § 60.18(d), the volume and 

component concentration of each relief 

valve discharge shall be estimated and 

calculation shall be made to verify 

ongoing compliance with the design and 

operating requirements of i i 80.18 (c)(3) 

through (c)(6). If more than one relief 

valve is discharged simultaneously to a 

single flare, these calculations shall 

account for the cumulative effect of all 

such relief valve discharges. These 

calculations shall be made and reported 

quarterly for all discharges within the 

quarter. Failure to comply with any of 

the requirements of this paragraph will 

be a violation of § 61.65(d)(2). 

Monitoring for the presence of a flare 

pilot flame shall be conducted in 

accordance with § 60.18(f)(2). If the 

results of this monitoring or any other 

information shows that the pilot flame is 

not present 100 percent of the time 

during which a relief valve discharge is 

routed to the flare, the relief valve 

discharge is subject to the provisions of 

§ 61.65(a). 

(ii) A report describing the flare 

design shall be provided to the 

Administrator not later than BO days 

after the adoption of this provision or 

within 30 days of the installation of a 

flare system for control of relief valve 

discharge whichever is later. The flare 

design report shall include calculations 

based upon expected relief valve 

discharge component concentrations 

and net heating values (for PVC this 

calculation shall be based on values 

expected if a release occurred at the 

instant the polymerization starts); and 

estimated maximum exit velocities 

based upon the design throat capacity of 

the gas in the relief valve. 
P.6 

Federal Register / Vol. 55, No. 132 / Tuesday, July 10, 1990 / Rule9 and Regulations 28349 

4. Section 61.68 is amended by 

revising the first sentence in paragraph 

(b) to read as follows: 

§ 61.68 Emission monitoring. 

**** * 

(b) The vinyl chloride monitoring 

system(s) used to meet the requirement 

in paragraph (a) of this section is to be a 

device which obtains representative 

samples from one or more applicable 

emission points on a continuous 

sequential basis and analyzes the 

samples with gas chromatography or, if 

the owner or operator assumes that all 

hydrocarbons measured are vinyl 

chloride, with infrared 

spectrophotometry, flame ion detection, 

or an alternative method. * * * 

**** * 

5. Section 61.242-2 of subpart V is 

amended by revising paragraphs (d) 

introductory text, (d)(5), and (d)(6), and 

by adding paragraphs (d)(4) (i), (ii) and 

(iii) to read as follows: 

§ 61.242-2 Standards: Pumps. 

(d) Each pump equipped with a dual 

mechanical seal system that includes a 

barrier fluid system is exempt from the 

requirements of paragraphs (a) and (b) 

of this section, provided the following 

requirements are met: 

**** * 

(4) * * * 

(i) If there are indications of liquid 

dripping from the pump seal at the time 

of the weekly inspection, the pump shall 

be monitored as specified in § 61.245 to 

determine the presence of VOC and 

VHAP in the barrier fluid. 

(ii) If the monitor reading (taking into 

account any background readings) 

indicates the presence of VHAP, a leak 

is detected. For the purpose of this 

paragraph, the monitor may be 

calibrated with VHAP, or may employ a 

gas chromatography column to limit the 

response of the monitor to VHAP, at the 

option of the owner or operator. 

(iii) If an instrument reading of 10,000-

ppm or greater (total VOC) is measured, 

a leak is detected. 

(5) Each sensor as described in 

paragraph (d)(3) of this section is 

checked daily or is equipped with an 

audible alarm. 

(6)(i) The owner or operator 

determines, based on design 

considerations and operating 

experience, criteria applicable to the 

presence and frequency of drips and to 

the sensor that indicates failure of the 

seal system, the barrier fluid system, or 

both. 

(ii) If indications of liquids dripping 

from the pump seal exceed the criteria 

established in paragraph (d)(6)(i) of this 

section, or if, based on the criteria 

established in paragraph (d)(6)(i) of this 

section, the sensor indicates failure of 

the seal system, the barrier fluid system, 

or both, a leak is detected. 

(iii) When a leak is detected, it shall 

be repaired as soon as practicable, but 

no later than 15 calendar days after it is 

detected, except as provided in § 61.242-

10. 

(iv) A first attempt at repair shall be 

made no later than five calendar days 

after each leak is detected. 

**** * 

[FR Doc. 90-16015 Filed 7-9-90; 8:45 am) 

BILLING CODE 6560-SO-M 
P.7 

36932 

1 

Corrections 

A j i-PA 

Federal Register 

Vol. 55, No. 174 

Friday, September 7, 1990 

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER 

contains editorial corrections of previously 

published Presidential, Rule, Proposed 

Rule, and Notice documents. These 

corrections are prepared by the Office of 

the Federal Register. Agency prepared 

corrections are issued as signed 

documents and appear in the appropriate 

document categories elsewhere in the 

issue. 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 60 

[AD-FRL 2960-5] 

RIN 2060-AA30 

Standards of Performance for New 

Stationary Sources; Volatile Organic 

Compound (VOC) Emissions From the 

Synthetic Organic Chemical 

Manufacturing Industry (SOCMI) Air 

Oxidation Processes 

Correction 

In rule document 90-14263 beginning 

on page 26912 in the issue of Friday, 

June 29,1990, make the following 

corrections: 

1. On page 26922, in the first column, 

above the signature line, the dated line 

should read "June 13,1990". 

§60.611 [Corrected] 

2. On the same page, in the third 

column, in § 60.611 under the definition 

for "Air Oxidation Reactojr", in the third 

line, "combine" should read 

"combined". 

§60.614 [Corrected] 

3. On page 26928, in § 60.614 in Table 

2, in the third column, the second entry 

should read "0.0619". 

§60.615 [Corrected] 

4. In § 60.615(b)(3), on page 26929, in 

the first column, in the 4th complete 

paragraph, in the 12th line "records" 

was misspelled. 

BILUNG CODE 1505-01-0 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 60 

\ * * 

[AD-FRL 2960-6] 

RIN 2060-AA35 

Standards of Performance for New 

Stationary Sources; Volatile Organic 

Compound (VOC) Emissions From the 

Synthetic Organic Chemical 

Manufacturing Industry (SOCMI) 

Distillation Operations 

Correction 

In rule document 90-14265 beginning 

on page 26931 in the issue of Friday, 

June 29,1990, make the following 

correction: 

§60.665 [Corrected] 

In § 60.665(g)(4), on page 26950, in the 

first column, in the first and second lines 

of the sixth paragraph, the words 

"adsorber" and "absorber" were 

transposed. 

BILLING CODE 1505414 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 421 

[OW-FRL-3729-8] 

RIN 2040-AB31 

Nonferrous Metals Manufacturing 

Point Source Category Effluent 

Limitations Guidelines, Pretreatment 

Standards and New Source 

Performance Standards 

Correction 

In rule document 90-17782 beginning 

on page 31692, in the issue of Friday, 

August 3,1990, make the following 

corrections: 

§421.152 [Corrected] 

1. In § 421.152(m), on page 31698, in 

the first column, in the second column of 

the table, the fourth entry, "2.117" 

should read "2.118". 

§421.263 [Corrected] 

2. On page 31708, in the first column. 

in § 421.263(j), the first word, "Platinum" 

should read "Palladium". 

3. On page 31712, in the first column, 

under

 8 421.266 [Corrected], in 

amendatory instruction 109, in the next 

to last line remove the text following 

"metals" and insert "to read as 

follows:". 

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D 

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION 

46 CFR Part 580 

[Docket No. 88-19] 

Rule on Effective Date of Tariff 

Changes 

Correction 

In rule document 90-20084 beginning 

on page 34929, in the issue of Monday, 

August 27,1990, make the following 

correction: 

On page 34931, in the third column, in 

the last line, "October 20,1990." should 

read "October 26,1990." 

BILUNG CODE 150541-D 

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES 

Health Care Financing Administration 

Statement of Organization, Functions, 

and Delegations of Authority 

Correction 

In notice document 90-18425 

appearing on page 32149, in the issue of 

Tuesday, August 7,1990, make the 

following correction: 

On page 32149, in the third column, 

under "B. Office of the Attorney Advisor 

(FA-2)", in the 12th and 13th lines, 

"Section 1886(d)(l)(C)(iii)(II)" should 

read "section 1886(d)(10)(C)(iii)(II)". 

BILUNG CODE 1505-01-D 

! 

4 

I 

; 
P.8 

Federal Regis!®!? / Vol. 55, No. 174 / Friday, September 7, 1990 / Sunshine Act Meetings 36931 

MATTERS TO SE CONSIDERED 

1. Approval of Minutes of Previous Closed 

Meeting. 

2. Central Liquidity .Facility lines cf CrediS 

for Fiscal Year 1891. Closed pursuant to 

exemptions (4) and (SXA}[ii). 

3. Administrative Action under Part 745 of 

the NCUA Rules acd liegdaticna. Des-J 

pursuant to exemptions [8] acd {Q\ 

4. Admiaiatrstive AcJicnijcderScstr/jn £33 

of the Federal Credit LtaioaAct. C!rscd 

pursuant to exemptions (51, J8), (9i(Alfu), and 

(9)(B). 

5. ftdmimstrati-pe Action under Sections 

116 and 208 cf 'tha Federal Credit Vnicr. Azl. 

Closed pursuant to exemptions (8) end 

(9)(A)(H). 

6. Administrative Actiocs enf Erfcc-im 

208 of the Federal Credit Union Act. Closed 

pursuant to exemptions (8) and (9)(A)(ii). 

FOR FUCTKS3 lEPORESATCEKl -ssx^sisn 

Becky Baker, Secretary of the Board, 

Telephone (202) 682-9600. 

Becky Baker, 

Secretary of the Board. 

[FR Doc. 90-21178 Filed 9-5-80; 1:56 pmj 

BILLING CODE 7SIS-C5-C 

©V2ES2A8 PKtWATF INVESTMENT 

e©S?©3ATC©Kt 

Meeting of the Board of Directors 

Y!E3S cux® BATE: 1 p.m. (closed portion), 

3:50 pun. (open portion), Tuesday, 

September 18,19S0. 

PH££3 bbfbces zi ± 3 '-Gsrporaiion, fonrtii 

floor Board Room, 1615 M Street, NW,,. 

Washington, DC. 

STCi-us: The first part of the meeting 

from I p.m. to 3:3C p.m. will be closed to 

the public. The open portion -off 1he 

meafZj .vrll Ec;r:nr:iceat3i30pjm. 

(ap-c-rb^rebj,]. 

aaWEKS ¥0 ES (E0PCS5CERED: IQosed .to 

the public l;G9>m. to 3:30 p.m.); 

1. F.ccident's Repcri 

2. Policy Revision on "Country List" and 

"High Income" Country Designations 

3. Finance end Insurance,project in 

Ven3£utid 

4 In: u ur.oe Project In Argentina 

5. lnsurcr.ee pjc;sti in Malaysia 

8. Insurance Project in Pakistan 

7. Insurance Project in Philippines 

8. Insurance Project in Chile 

9. Insurance Project in Argentina 

10. Claims Report 

11. Finance and Insurance Reports 

12. Approval of 7/10/90 Minutes (Closed 

Portion) 

FURTHER WAITERS TO ES CONSIDERED: 

(Open to 4he Public 3:30 p.m.} 

1. Approval of 7jl0,'.$0 Minutes {Open 

Portienj 

2. MooatianofSetained Jfercangs 

3. Information Seporto 

•C SeconETmatlon of craeKngs schedule for 

remainder •ol 1930 

CONTACT .PERSSN .FOR JKFGRKATCCai: 

Information with regard to the meeting 

may be obtained from the Secretary cf 

the Corporation on (202) 457-7007. 

Dated: September 4.1990. 

Dennis K. Dolan, 

' OP1C Corporate Secretary. 

|FR Doc. 90-21170 Filed 9-5-90; 1:24 piir] 

BILLING CODE 32.10-01-09