alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 13** 
**- 7735** 

EDDIE GAMBLE, SR. ,
Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v.

VERNESSA CRADDOCK ,
Defendant

– Appellee ,
and

L. T. WRIGHT ,
Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh

. Louise W. Flanagan , District Judge. ( 5:11

- ct

- 03176

- FL )

Submitted : February 27, 2014 Decided: March 5 , 2014

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Eddie Gamble, Sr. , Appellant Pro Se. Michael Lockridge, Special Assistant U nited S tates Attorney , Butner, North Carolina, for Appellee

.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in t his circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Eddie Gamble, Sr. , ap peals the district court ’ s order s
dismissing without prejudice his complaint filed pursuant to
Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics , 403 U.S. 388 (1971) , and denying his motions for

reconsideration . We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Gamble v. Craddock , No. 5:11

- ct

- 03176

- FL
(E.D.N.C. May 28, 2013 & Aug. 21, 2013 ). We deny as moot
Gamble’s motion to expedite and dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-1459
MARY L. OUTIN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Dennis W. Shedd, District Judge. (CA-94-1818-3-19BD) Submitted: December 10, 1996 Decided: December 19, 1996 Before HALL, MURNAGHAN, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Mary L. Outin, Appellant Pro Se. Jonathan Pharr Pearson, Stephen Carrington Mitchell, OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Mary L. Outin appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment to Defendant in this employment discriminationaction. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Outin v. Travelers Insurance Co. , No. CA-94-1818-3- 19BD (D.S.C. Mar. 20, 1996). We dispense with oral argument becausethe facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### The State *versus*Fielding.

Where an offence is, by law, made more highly punishable, if committed upon a person of a particular class, than if committed, upon a person of another class, an indictment for the offence may be maintained, though, it do not specify to which of the classes, the injured person belongs.

Upon a conviction on such an indictment, the milder punishment only will be-awarded.

Indictment for an assault upon one Joanna Roberts, with intent, *her*the said Joanna Roberts feloniously to ravish and carnally know by force and against *her*will.

The defendant moved the court to quash the indictment, because it does not set forth whether said Joanna was of the age of ten years, or under that age. The motion was refused, and the defendant filed exceptions.

The defendant also moved in arrest of judgment.

Morrill, for the defendant.

It was essential to allege in the indictment what was the age of Joanna. If under ten years, the punishment *must be*in the State’s prison; if over that age, it *may be*in the State’s prison *or*in the county jail. It cannot, therefore, be known what punishment to inflict.

*Vose,*County Attorney, for the State.

Wells, J.,

orally.—The offence may have been one, to which the greater of the penalties mentioned by the. counsel should attach; and it may have been one to which the less penalty should attach.

Of one or of the other, the defendant is guilty. He cannot complain of a decision which should hold him for the minor offence, and of that offence he is adjudged guilty.

*Exceptions overruled.*

The argument. in support of the motion in arrest, is, that Joanna Roberts is not alleged to be a female. But the name is that of a female, and in the indictment she is twice spoken of as a female; by the use of the feminine pronoun.

*Motion overruled.*
No. 46266.

#### Protest 975721-G of Saji Trading Co. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

On the agreed facts that the wooden cabinets in question are similar to those the subject of Abstracts 37636 and 39945 the claim at *33%*percent under paragraph 412 was sustained.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

The U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) Region I Regulatory Fairness Board and the SBA Office of the National Ombudsman will hold a National Regulatory Fairness Hearing on Tuesday, May 1, 2007, at 1 p.m. The forum will take place at the Rhode Island Convention Center, 1 Sabin Street, Room 558, Providence, RI 02903. The purpose of the meeting is for Business Organizations, Trade Associations, Chambers of Commerce and related organizations serving small business concerns to report experiences regarding unfair or excessive Federal regulatory enforcement issues affecting their members. 

                    Anyone wishing to attend or to make a presentation must contact Norm Deragon, in writing or by fax in order to be placed on the agenda. Norm Deragon, Public Information Officer, SBA, Providence District Office, 380 Westminster Street, Room 511, Providence, RI 02903, phone (401) 528-4561, Ext. 4576 and fax (401) 528-4539, e-mail:                     *Norm.deragon@sba.gov.*

                    For more information, see our Web site at                     *http://www.sba.gov/​ombudsman.*

Matthew Teague, 

Committee Management Officer.

 [FR Doc. E7-7363 Filed 4-17-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-09-342-CV

IN RE DONALD D. FREIER	RELATOR

	------------

	ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

	------------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1

	------------

	The court has considered Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and is of the opinion that the petition should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction.  See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221(b) (Vernon 2004); In re Simmonds, 271 S.W.3d 874, 879 (Tex. App.—Waco, 2008, orig. proceeding).  Accordingly, Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is dismissed.

								PER CURIAM

PANEL:	  LIVINGSTON, MCCOY, and MEIER, JJ. 

DELIVERED:  October 15, 2009
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 23-0604

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

vs. 

BOBBY FRANCIS LOWRY,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including September 3, 2024, within which to prepare, 

file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 29 2024

07/29/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0604
# C_2021459EN.01004601.xml

| 12.11.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 459/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.11.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 459/46

---

INNOVATIVE MEDICINES INITIATIVE 2 JOINT UNDERTAKING

Publication of the final accounts for the financial year 2020

(2021/C 459/46)

The complete version of the final accounts may be found at the following address:

https://www.imi.europa.eu/sites/default/files/IMI2_JU_2020_Final_Annual_Accounts.pdf

---
EXHIBIT 15




November 10, 2000

Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549

Commissioners:

We are aware that our report dated November 10, 2000 on our
reviews of interim financial information of UniSource Energy
Corporation (the Company) and Tucson Electric Power Company
(TEP) as of and for the period ended September 30, 2000 and
included in the Company's and TEP's quarterly report on Form 10-
Q for the quarter then ended is incorporated by reference in
the Company's Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-
43765, 333-43767, 333-43769, 333-53309, 333-53333 and 333-
53337), on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-31043 and 333-93769), and on Form
S-4 (No. 333-60809) and in TEP's Amendment No. 3 to the
Registration Statement on Form S-4 (No. 333-65143).

Very truly yours,



PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
# C_2017129EN.01001201.xml

| 24.4.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 129/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.4.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 129/12

---

Order of the President of the Court of 24 January 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Audiencia Provincial de Cantabria — Spain) — Liberbank, SA v Rafael Piris del Campo

(Case C-431/15) (1)

1

(2017/C 129/14)

Language of the case: Spanish

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 354, 26.10.2015.

1

---
NOT RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION File Name: 14a0807n.06
No. 1 4

- 1 293
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

JOSEPH HUBBARD , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, FA et al. , Defendant s - Appellees

. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
OPINION

Before: BATCHELDER , GILMAN , and GIBBONS , Circuit Judges . RO NALD LEE GILMAN, Circuit Judge. In October 2006, Joseph Hubbard took out a loan from Washington Mutual Bank to buy a house with his girlfriend. He stopped making regular payments on the loan in March 2008, and the house was sold to Federal National Mortgage A ssociation (Fannie Mae) at a nonjudicial foreclosure sale in September 2010. Hubbard did not take any action in response to the sale until eight months later, when Fannie Mae initiated eviction proceedings against him. With eviction proceedings underway, Hubbard filed suit in the Washtenaw County Circuit Court against Washington Mutual and Fannie Mae, claiming that procedural flaws invalidated the foreclosure against his home. The defendants then removed the case to federal court. After months of discov ery, Washington Mutual and Fannie Mae moved for summary judgment on all claims. The district court granted the ir motion. It determined that Hubbard had- 2

-

failed to present evidence of any fraud or irregularity in the foreclosure process , thus making him

su bject to Michigan’s standard six

- month period to redeem his house . Because Hubbard failed to mak e the required payments on the loan within that time , the court concluded that he no longer had “any legally cognizable interest” in the property

. The court f urther decided that all of his claims were legally and factually meritless. Hubb ard now appeals that decision. After carefully considering the record on appeal, the briefs of the parties, and the applicable law, we agree with the district court’s grant of summary judgment to Washington Mutual and Fannie Mae. The issuance of a detailed written opinion by this court would be unduly duplicative because the reasoning that supports judgment for the defendants has been clearly articulated by the district cour t in a thorough and comprehensive opinion . Accordingly, the judgment rendered by the Honorable Patrick James Duggan, Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Michigan at Detroit, is AFFIRMED on the basis of the reasoning detailed in h is Opinion and Order dated February 6, 2014.
Exhibit 32
   UNISOURCE
ENERGY CORPORATION
  TUCSON
ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY
  _____________________
   STATEMENTS
OF CORPORATE OFFICERS
 (Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
 
 _____________________
 
 Each of the
undersigned, James S. Pignatelli, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief
Executive Officer of UniSource Energy Corporation and Tucson Electric Power
Company (each a “Company”), and Kevin P. Larson, Senior Vice President,
Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of each Company, hereby certifies,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that each Company’s
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained therein
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of such Company.


August 8,
      2008
              
              /s/ James S.
      PignatelliJames S.
      Pignatelli
                Chairman of
      the Board, President and
                Chief
      Executive Officer
                UniSource
      Energy Corporation
                Tucson
      Electric Power Company/s/ Kevin P.
      LarsonKevin P.
      Larson
                Senior Vice
      President, Treasurer and
                Chief
      Financial Officer
                UniSource
      Energy Corporation
                Tucson
      Electric Power Company
# C_2016364EN.01001202.xml

| 3.10.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 364/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.10.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 364/12

---

Order of the President of the Fourth Chamber of the Court of 12 July 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato — Italy) — Società LIS Srl, Società Cerutti Lorenzo Srl v Abbanoa SpA: in the presence of: Consorzio Stabile CSI — Consorzio Servizi Integrati Soc. cons. arl, Procelli Costruzioni Srl, Bondini Srl, Assisi Strade Srl

(Case C-287/15) (1)

(2016/C 364/08)

Language of the case: Italian

The President of the Fourth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 302, 14.9.2015.

---
# Official Journal L 38/2007

| | ISSN 1725-2555 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 38 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5010 February 2007 |

ISSN 1725-2555

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 38

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5010 February 2007

---

| Contents | | I   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | | Commission Regulation (EC) No 124/2007 of 9 February 2007 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables | 1 |
| | | Commission Regulation (EC) No 125/2007 of 9 February 2007 on the issue of import licences for high-quality fresh, chilled or frozen beef and veal | 3 |

Contents

I   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is obligatory

page

REGULATIONS

Commission Regulation (EC) No 124/2007 of 9 February 2007 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

Commission Regulation (EC) No 125/2007 of 9 February 2007 on the issue of import licences for high-quality fresh, chilled or frozen beef and veal

3

| | | II   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is not obligatory |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | | Commission |
| | | 2007/88/EC |
| | * | Commission Decision of 8 February 2007 on the allocation to the Netherlands and the United Kingdom of three additional fishing days for enhanced observer coverage in accordance with Annex IIA to Council Regulation (EC) No 51/2006
  (notified under document number C(2007) 365) | 4 |

II   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is not obligatory

DECISIONS

Commission

2007/88/EC

*

Commission Decision of 8 February 2007 on the allocation to the Netherlands and the United Kingdom of three additional fishing days for enhanced observer coverage in accordance with Annex IIA to Council Regulation (EC) No 51/2006
  (notified under document number C(2007) 365)

(notified under document number C(2007) 365)

4

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  February 9, 2011 | /s/ MICHAEL E. BATTEN                |
|-----------------------------------|--------------------------------------|
|                              | Michael E. Batten                    |
|                              | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                    1,932,073
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                     71,372
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         279,767
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                       330,932
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,614,144
<COMMON>                                       638,939
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                            0
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                          (420,790)
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 218,149
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                         1,205,951
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                      500
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                    887,820
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                15,163
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 286,561
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                2,614,144
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      568,340
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            21,070
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     436,540
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     457,610
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        110,730
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                              52,719
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 163,449
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        78,641
<NET-INCOME>                                    84,808
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                          0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   84,808
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                             0
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                            0
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                          72,452
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.64
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.64
        



</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO.: 2:13-CR-215

JUDGE SMITH

MAGISTRATE JUDGE DEAVERS

HERBERT E. MYLES, 

Defendant.

ORDER

On September 26, 2013, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), recommending that the Court accept Defendant’s guilty plea to an

Information charging him with escape from the custody of the Attorney General, in violation of 18

U.S.C. § 751. Defendant, represented by counsel, waived his right to appear on the matter before

a District Judge. The Magistrate Judge conducted the colloquy required by Rule 11 of the Federal

Rules of Criminal Procedure. Defendant’s plea was knowing, voluntary, free from coercion, and

had a basis in fact. Further, the Magistrate Judge observed that at the time Defendant entered his

guilty plea, he was in full possession of his faculties, was not suffering from any apparent physical

or mental illness, and was not under the influence of narcotics or alcohol. 

Defendant was specifically informed of his right to contest the Report and Recommendation

by filing any objections within 14 days of the issuance of the Report and Recommendation pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(B) and Rule 72(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Defendant did

not file any objections. 

Case: 2:13-cr-00215-GCS-EPD Doc #: 21 Filed: 10/16/13 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation and ACCEPTS

Defendant’s plea of guilty to the Information. Defendant is hereby adjudged guilty of escape from

the custody of the Attorney General.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 /s/ George C. Smith 

GEORGE C. SMITH, JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

-2-

Case: 2:13-cr-00215-GCS-EPD Doc #: 21 Filed: 10/16/13 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>