alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT





Certification for Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act





I, Stuart Ducote, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of United Mortgage Trust;





2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))) for the registrant and have:





(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;





(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the liability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.





(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such  evaluation; and





(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and





5. I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors:





(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and





(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.


UNITED MORTGAGE TRUSTDate: May 16, 2011
By
/s/ Stuart DucotePresident
**Exhibit 15.1**

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 

Weconsent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333- 214581 on Form F-4 and Registration Statements Nos.333-165065,333-165566,333-169272,333-171231,333-172069,333-178664,333-188517,333-192806,333-201386 and 333-208634 on Form S-8 of our reports dated March 20, 2017, relating to the 2016 consolidated financialstatements and the retrospective adjustments to the 2015 and 2014 financial statement disclosures of Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph regarding retrospective adjustmentsto the 2015 and 2014 consolidated financial statement disclosures on segment information), and the effectiveness of Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV’s internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 20-F of Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV for the year ended December 31, 2016. 

Zaventem, 22 March 2017 

/s/ Joël Brehmen 

DELOITTE Bedrijfsrevisoren / Reviseursd’Entreprises 

BV o.v.v.e. CVBA / SC s.f.d. SCRL
Case: 2:11-md-02233-GLF-EPD Doc #: 181 Filed: 03/19/14 Page: 1 of 13  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-md-02233-GLF-EPD Doc #: 181 Filed: 03/19/14 Page: 2 of 13  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-md-02233-GLF-EPD Doc #: 181 Filed: 03/19/14 Page: 3 of 13  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-md-02233-GLF-EPD Doc #: 181 Filed: 03/19/14 Page: 4 of 13  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-md-02233-GLF-EPD Doc #: 181 Filed: 03/19/14 Page: 5 of 13  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-md-02233-GLF-EPD Doc #: 181 Filed: 03/19/14 Page: 6 of 13  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-md-02233-GLF-EPD Doc #: 181 Filed: 03/19/14 Page: 7 of 13  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-md-02233-GLF-EPD Doc #: 181 Filed: 03/19/14 Page: 8 of 13  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-md-02233-GLF-EPD Doc #: 181 Filed: 03/19/14 Page: 9 of 13  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-md-02233-GLF-EPD Doc #: 181 Filed: 03/19/14 Page: 10 of 13  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-md-02233-GLF-EPD Doc #: 181 Filed: 03/19/14 Page: 11 of 13  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-md-02233-GLF-EPD Doc #: 181 Filed: 03/19/14 Page: 12 of 13  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-md-02233-GLF-EPD Doc #: 181 Filed: 03/19/14 Page: 13 of 13  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-08T14:08:34-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
**Committee on the JudiciaryHearings Index Page (ordered by date)**
hju31311.000
# C_2015245EN.01000801.xml

| 27.7.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 245/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.7.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 245/8

---

Request a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Santa Maria Capua Vetere (Italy) of 11 May 2015 — Criminal proceedings against Massimo Orsi

(Case C-217/15)

(2015/C 245/11)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunale di Santa Maria Capua Vetere

Party to the main proceedings

Party to the main proceedings

Massimo Orsi

Questione pregiudiziale

Questione pregiudiziale

On a proper construction of Article 4 of [Protocol No 7 to the European Convention on the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms] and Article 50 [of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union], is the provision made under Article 10b of Legislative Decree No 74/00 consistent with Community law, in so far as it permits the criminal liability of a person to whom a final assessment by the tax authorities of the State has already been issued imposing an administrative penalty in the sum of 30 % of the unpaid amount to be assessed in respect of the same act or omission (non-payment of VAT)?

---
Searched for **http://www.nwcouncil.org/fw/isab/isab99-2/**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **http://www.nwcouncil.org/fw/isab/isab99-2/**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 41073

STATE OF IDAHO ,
Plaintiff-Respondent ,

v.

MELISSA ANNE HERNANDEZ, aka STEVENSON ,
Defendant-Appellant

. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2014 Unpublished Opinion No. 306

Filed: January 6, 2014

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED OPINION AND SHALL NOT BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Ada County. Hon. Deborah A. Bail , District Judge.

Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of fifteen years, with a minimum period of confinement of two and one

- half years , for felony dr iving under the influence of alcohol with a persistent violator sentencing enhancement

, affirmed

.
Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Kimberly E. Smith , Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Kenneth K. Jorgensen, Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent.

________________________________________________ Before GUTIERREZ, Chief Judge; LANSING, Judge; and GRATTON, Judge

PER CURIAM

Melissa Anne Hernandez was convicted of felony driving under the influence of alcohol

, Idaho Code § § 18

- 800 4, 18

- 8005(6), with a persistent violator sentencing enhancement, I.C.
§ 19

- 2514 . The district court sentenced Hernandez to a unified term of fifteen years wi th a
minimum period of confinement of two and one

- half years

. She filed an Idaho Criminal Rule 35

motion for reduction of sentence which was denied. Hernandez appeals, contending that her

sentence is excessive.2 Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the
factors to be considered in evaluating the reason ableness of the sentence are well established and
need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez , 121 Idaho 114, 117

- 18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014

- 15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez , 106 Idaho 447, 449

- 51, 680 P.2d 869, 871

- 73 (Ct. App.
1984); State v. Toohill , 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing
the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver , 144 Idaho
722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having rev iewed the record
in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.
Therefore, Hernandez ’s judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.
No. 62056.

#### Twin Textiles Co. *v.*United States,

protests 192067-K and 227367-K (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of veils or veilings similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Elvic Import Corp.*v. *United States*(38 Cust. Ct. 13, C. D. 1837), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
III 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 306 

Recognizing that Veterans Day is a day to honor all veterans of the Army 

and to support the Army Freedom Team Salute’s mission to recognize 

the unsung heroes who have served this country. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 10, 2005 

Mr. AKAKA (for himself and Mr. BOND) submitted the following resolution; 

which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing that Veterans Day is a day to honor all veterans 

of the Army and to support the Army Freedom Team 

Salute’s mission to recognize the unsung heroes who 

have served this country. 

Whereas Army personnel have for 230 years answered the 

call to duty by becoming guardians and defenders of 

America’s freedoms; 

Whereas millions of Army veterans selflessly served this Nation and their legacy of duty has reigned in their continued support of the mission of the Army; 

Whereas the Army appreciates the sacrifices these courageous 

men and women have made in answering the call to duty 

by choosing a life of service; 
2 

•SRES 306 ATS

Whereas the 83rd Congress created Veterans Day as a national day of observance to commemorate the heroes who 

served in the Armed Forces and the Army recognizes the 

importance of honoring those who have served their country; and 

Whereas the Army created the Freedom Team Salute program to provide a way for the United States and the 

Army to thank its veterans: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate recognizes that November 

2 11, 2005, Veterans Day, is a day to honor all Army vet3 erans and supports the Army Freedom Team Salute’s mis4 sion to recognize the unsung heroes who have served this 

5 country. 

Æ
# C_2015262EN.01001001.xml

| 10.8.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 262/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.8.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 262/10

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Netherlands) lodged on 5 June 2015 — Gemeente Woerden; other party: Staatssecretaris van Financiën

(Case C-267/15)

(2015/C 262/13)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Referring court

Hoge Raad der Nederlanden

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant on a point of law: Gemeente Woerden

Appellant on a point of law:

Other party: Staatssecretaris van Financiën

Other party:

Question referred

Question referred

In a case such as the present, in which a taxable person has had a building constructed and has sold that building for a price which does not cover all of the costs, while the purchaser of the building has given a certain part thereof to a third party for the latter’s use free of charge, is that taxable person entitled to deduct all of the VAT charged in respect of the construction of the building, or only a part thereof, in proportion to the parts of the building which the purchaser uses for economic activities (in the present case, leasing in return for payment)?

---
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-14-00821-CV

CITY OF CARRIZO SPRINGS and Adrian DeLeon, individually and as Mayor of the City of 

Carrizo Springs,

Appellants

v.

Isabel CUMPIAN, Bill Martin, Alfredo Z. Padilla, Individually and on behalf of the Carrizo 

Springs Housing Authority,

Appellees

From the 365th Judicial District Court, Dimmit County, Texas

Trial Court No. 14-09-12375-DCV-AJA

Honorable Amado J. Abascal, III, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Jason Pulliam, Justice

Delivered and Filed: March 11, 2015

DISMISSED

Appellants have filed an advisory to the court, stating that the parties have compromised 

all pending claims between them and that appellants withdraw their appeal. We construe the 

advisory as a motion to dismiss the appeal and we grant the motion. Because the advisory to the 

court does not disclose an agreement of the parties regarding the assessment of costs, we order all 
04-14-00821-CV

costs assessed against appellants. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d) (absent agreement of the parties, 

costs are taxed against appellant). 

PER CURIAM

- 2 -
No. 65698.

#### Sniafibres Corp. *v.*United States,

protests 60/3308, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise is similar in use to thrown silk not more advanced than singles, tram, or organzine and following the principles set forth in *United States*v. *Steinberg Bros.*(47 C.C.P.A. 47, C.A.D. 727), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
(logo) pwc

 

 

**Report of IndependentRegistered Public Accounting Firm**

 

To the Board of Directors, PNCFinancial Services Group, Inc.:

 

We have examinedmanagement’s assertion, included in the accompanying Report on Assessmentof Compliance with Regulation AB Servicing Criteria, that Midland LoanServices, a division of PNC Bank, National Association (“Midland”or the “Company”) complied with the servicing criteria set forth inItem 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for alltransactions serviced on the *Enterprise!* Loan Management System (the“Platform”), as of December 31, 2016 and for the year then ended,excluding criteria 1122(d)(1)(iii), 1122(d)(3)(i)(B), 1122(d)(3)(i)(C),1122(d)(3)(i)(D), 1122(d)(3)(ii), 1122(d)(3)(iii), 1122(d)(3)(iv), and1122(d)(4)(xv), which the Company has determined are not applicable to theservicing activities performed by it with respect to the Platform. Managementis responsible for the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria. Ourresponsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion based on ourexamination.

 

Our examination was conductedin accordance with attestation standards of the Public Company AccountingOversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a testbasis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the applicableservicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considerednecessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of selectedasset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing ofselected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whetherthe Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selectedactivities in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our procedureswere limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed bythe Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were notdesigned to detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurredprior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances oramounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by thisreport. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for ouropinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on theCompany’s compliance with the servicing criteria.

 

In our opinion,management’s assertion that Midland complied with the aforementionedapplicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016for the Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects.

 

 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

 

February 17, 2017

 

 

*PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP,1100 Walnut Street, Suite 1300, Kansas City, MO 64106*

*T: (816) 472 7921, F: (816)218 1890 www.pwc.com/us*
Exhibit 99.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Each  of the undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as an officer of 21st
Century Insurance Group (the "Company"), for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as  adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
the  best  of  his  knowledge:

     -    the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended
          March, 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
          of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     -    the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of
          the Company.

Dated:  May 14, 2003


 /s/ Bruce W. Marlow
---------------------------------------------
Bruce W. Marlow
President and Chief Executive Officer



 /s/ John M. Lorentz
---------------------------------------------
John M. Lorentz
Controller and Acting Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer and Acting Principal
Financial Officer)


A signed original of this written statement required be Section 906 has been
provided to 21st Century Insurance Group and will be retained by 21st Century
Insurance Group and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.


                                       28
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 32.2
------------

                              UNITED-GUARDIAN, INC.
                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

        In  connection  with the Annual  Report of  United-Guardian,  Inc.  (the
"Registrant") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2003, as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Kenneth H. Globus,  President  and Chief  Financial  Officer of the  Registrant,
hereby  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  section  1350,  as adopted  pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) the Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


Date:  May 7, 2004                        /s/ Kenneth H. Globus
                                          --------------------------
                                          Kenneth H. Globus
                                          President and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 15







August 19, 2004

Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549

Commissioners:

We are aware that our report dated August 19, 2004 on our reviews of interim
financial information of UniSource Energy Corporation (the Company) and Tucson
Electric Power Company (TEP) as of and for the period ended June 30, 2004 and
included in the Company's and TEP's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter then ended is incorporated by reference in the Company's Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-43765, 333-43767, 333-43769, 333-53309,
333-53333, 333-53337 and 333-99317), on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-31043, 333-93769 and
333-103392) and in TEP's Amendment No. 3 to the Registration Statement on Form
S-4 (No. 333-65143).

Very truly yours,


PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
confidential







Annual Statement as to Compliance
For the Period of January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2018

COMM 2016-DC2

In accordance with Item 1123 of Regulation
AB and with the requirements detailed in §10.11 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement (the “Agreement”)
for the above-mentioned CMBS pool, CWCapital Asset Management LLC (“CWCAM”), in its capacity as Special Servicer,
is providing this Officer’s Certificate with respect to the following:

| | (A) | a review of CWCAM’s activities during the preceding calendar
year or portion thereof (the “Reporting Period”) and of CWCAM’s performance under the Agreement has been
made under such officer’s supervision; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (B) | that, to the best of such officer’s knowledge, based on such
review, CWCAM has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact
us.

Sincerely,

CWCapital Asset Management LLC



James P. Shevlin

President/Chief Operating Officer



confidential
# C_2016027EN.01000902.xml

| 25.1.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 27/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.1.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 27/9

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato (Italy) lodged on 26 October 2015 — Undis Servizi Srl v Comune di Sulmona

(Case C-553/15)

(2016/C 027/12)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Referring court

Consiglio di Stato

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Undis Servizi Srl

Applicant:

Defendant: Comune di Sulmona

Defendant:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | When the ‘essential activity’ undertaken by the controlled body is assessed, must an activity imposed on it by a non-shareholder public administration and undertaken in favour of non-shareholder public bodies also be taken into account? |
| --- | --- |

1.

When the ‘essential activity’ undertaken by the controlled body is assessed, must an activity imposed on it by a non-shareholder public administration and undertaken in favour of non-shareholder public bodies also be taken into account?

| 2. | When the ‘essential activity’ undertaken by the controlled body is assessed, must the contracts awarded to shareholder public bodies before the requirement of ‘similar control’ became applicable also be taken into account? |
| --- | --- |

2.

When the ‘essential activity’ undertaken by the controlled body is assessed, must the contracts awarded to shareholder public bodies before the requirement of ‘similar control’ became applicable also be taken into account?

---