alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                           UT
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-2000
<BOOK-VALUE>                                   PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      530,681
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                    142,318
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         270,517
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                       33,816
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                 878,384
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,855,716
<COMMON>                                       282,794
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      254
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            199,446
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 482,494
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           522,202
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                             0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                      80,342
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                 0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                  859
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                      0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                    15,830
<LEASES-CURRENT>                               398
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 753,591
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  1,855,716
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      646,098
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                           47,574
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     514,648
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     562,222
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        83,876
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                             1,293
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 85,169
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       30,801
<NET-INCOME>                                   54,368
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                    0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                  54,368
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                       30,392
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                      31,578
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         52,327
<EPS-BASIC>                                    3.86
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  3.86



</TABLE>
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

STEVEN JOSEPH KOTARSKI,

Appellant,

v. Case No. 5D22-1743

LT Case No. 2020-CF-002135-A

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

________________________________/

Decision filed April 18, 2023

Appeal from the Circuit Court 

for Lake County,

Heidi Davis, Judge.

Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, 

and Edward J. Weiss, Assistant 

Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for 

Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Alyssa M. Williams, 

Assistant Attorney General, Daytona 

Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

MAKAR, JAY and SOUD, JJ., concur.
Case: 2:12-cv-01181-EAS-EPD Doc #: 57 Filed: 11/15/13 Page: 1 of 1  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-12T14:50:47-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
Date 5/11/11 Page of



### POST FOCUS EXPOSURE REPORT Summary Page

Remarks: Updated based on Test Data Review Engineering Report, Post- Focus Draft

Revision

Chemical ID: P-11-0234 Re viewe r: Delpire

Endpoints- Assessed Table

Endpoi nts /Assessment Cycles 1 Releases

Assessed in

NCEM2? Reasons for not assessing releases

No X B

Test ing Required No

Hazard

Concern No

Release s Release

Below

Acute

Threshold 5 Release

Below

Chronic

Threshold 5 Other

Ingestion

Surface water

Ground water ( landfill )

Consumer Use: DtD 2

Inhalation

Air : incineration ( stack )

Air : fugitive

Consumer Use: CEM 3

Dermal

Consumer Use: CEM

Eco

Surface water : ADR

conc and/or PDM 4

Consumer Use: DtD

1 Assessment cycles are endpoint concentrations and dose calculations within the NCEM2 model.

2 Down

- the

- Drain

3 Consumer Exposure Model

4 Probabilistic Dilution Model

5 The threshold values for assessing endpoints are 1 mg/day for acute doses and 1 mg/year for chronic doses.

EAB DROP: Release information for this compound does not meet criteria for preparatio n of an exposure assessment in the Exposure Assessment Branch = s (EAB) Initial Review Exposure Report (this report).
```

[Federal Register: May 6, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 87)]
[Notices]               
[Page 24926]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr06my10-34]                         

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION

 
Sunshine Act Meetings

Time and Date:  Wednesday, May 12, 2010; 2 p.m.-4 p.m.

Place:  Hearing Room 420, Bethesda Towers, 4330 East West Highway, 
Bethesda, Maryland.

Status:  Closed to the Public.

Matters to be Considered: 
    Compliance Status Report:
    The Commission staff will brief the Commission on the status of 
compliance matters.
    For a recorded message containing the latest agenda information, 
call (301) 504-7948.

Contact Person for More Information:  Todd A. Stevenson, Office of the 
Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West 
Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814, (301) 504-7923.

    Dated: May 3, 2010.
Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-10833 Filed 5-4-10; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
```
EXHIBIT 12


<TABLE>


               TRANSAMERICA FIANANCE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

<CAPTION>



                                                        Nine months ended September 30,
                                                          1998                1997
                                                        (Dollar amounts in millions)
<S>                                                        <C>               <C>    
Fixed charges:
         Interest and debt expense                       $    279.9      $    254.2
         One-third of rental expense                           18.9            18.3
                                                         ----------      ----------
Total                                                    $    298.8      $    272.5
                                                         ==========      ==========

Earnings:
         Income from continuing operations               $     97.3      $    101.1
         Provision for income taxes                            59.8            62.9
         Fixed charges                                        298.8           272.5
                                                         ----------      ----------
Total                                                    $    455.9      $    436.5
                                                         ==========      ==========

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                             1.53            1.60


</TABLE>
United Air Lines, Inc. and Subsidiary Companies
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges    Six Months Ended June 30    20052004 (In Millions)Earnings:     Loss before income taxes$(2,483)$(686)Fixed charges, from below369 324 Undistributed earnings of affiliates4 (2)Interest capitalized(5)1   Loss$ (2,115)$ (363)   Fixed charges:    Interest expense$ 226 $ 243 Portion of rental expense representative  of the interest factor14381   Fixed charges$ 369$ 324   Ratio of earnings to fixed charges(a)(a)      
___________
(a) Earnings were inadequate to cover fixed charges by $2.5 billionin 2005 and $687 million in 2004.
# Official Journal C 156/20 J

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 156 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5120 June 2008 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 156

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5120 June 2008

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES |
| 2008/C 156/01 | Commission communication in the framework of the implementation of the Council Directive 89/686/EEC of 21 December 1989 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to personal protective equipment (Publication of titles and references of harmonised standards under the directive) (1) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES

2008/C 156/01

Commission communication in the framework of the implementation of the Council Directive 89/686/EEC of 21 December 1989 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to personal protective equipment (Publication of titles and references of harmonised standards under the directive) (1)

(Publication of titles and references of harmonised standards under the directive

1

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
(Reap. Dec. 9797)

#### Haddad & Sons, Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 24675, etc.

(Decided October 6, 1960)

*James G. McGoldrich*for the plaintiff.

*George GoohranDoub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Mollison, Judge:

Counsel for the parties have submitted the appeals for reappraisement enumerated in the attached schedule of reappraisements for decision upon stipulation, on the basis of which I find export value, as defined in section 402a (d), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the articles identified in schedule A, also attached hereto, and that such value, in each case, is the invoice unit price, ex-factory, net, packing included.

Judgment will issue accordingly.

*501Schedule A

The manufacturer and seller of the merchandise herein is:

> Hayakawa Rubber Co., Ltd.

> Fukuyama, Japan

> R59/8731 (Export date: Nov. 25,1958)

> Rubber Shoes — Sponge Sandals (Zori)

> SR-0138 — children’s—2000 doz. pair, invoiced at $1.65 per dozen

> SR-0139 — ladies—3000 doz. pair, invoiced at $2.40 per doz. pair, ex-factory, net, packed

> SR-0140 — men—2000 doz. pair, invoiced at $2.60 per doz. pair, ex-factory, net, packed

> R59/8726 (Export date: Dee. 16, 1958)

> Rubber Shoes — Sponge Sandals (Zori)

> SR-0138 — children’s—2000 doz. pair, invoiced at $1.65 per doz. pair, ex-factory, net, packed

> R59/8724 (Export date: Dee. 16,1958)

> Rubber Shoes — Sponge Sandals (Zori)

> SR-0139 — ladies—3000 doz. pair, invoiced at $2.40 per doz. pair, ex-factory, net, packed

> R59/8727 (Export date: Dec. 16,1958)

> Rubber Shoes — Sponge Sandals (Zori)

> SR-0140 — men—2000 doz. pair, invoiced at $2.60 per doz. pair, ex-factory, net, packed

> R59/10697 (Export date: Jan. 27,1959)

> Rubber Shoes — Sponge Sandals (Zori)

> SR-0139 — ladies—3000 doz. pair, invoiced at $2.40 per doz. pair, ex-factory, net, packed

> R59/10698 (Export date: Jan. 27,1959)

> Rubber Shoes — Sponge Sandals (Zori)

> SR-0140 — men—1000 doz. pair, invoiced at $2.60 per doz. pair, ex-factory, net, packed
# C_2016243EN.01001301.xml

| 4.7.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 243/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.7.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 243/13

---

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 28 April 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Administratīvā apgabaltiesa — Latvia) — SIA ‘Oniors Bio’ v Valsts ieņēmumu dienests

(Case C-233/15) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 - Common Customs Tariff - Tariff classification - Combined Nomenclature - Subheadings 1517 90 91 and 1518 00 31 - Mixture of fluid vegetable oil, unprocessed, non-volatile, composed of rapeseed oil (88 %) and sunflower oil (12 %)))

(2016/C 243/12)

Language of the case: Latvian

Referring court

Referring court

Administratīvā apgabaltiesa

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: SIA ‘Oniors Bio’

Applicant:

Defendant: Valsts ieņēmumu dienests

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Combined Nomenclature set out in Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff, in the version resulting from Commission Regulation (EU) No 1006/2011 of 27 September 2011, must be interpreted as meaning that, in order to determine whether a mixture of vegetable oils such as that at issue in the main proceedings must be classified as an edible mixture of vegetable oils under CN subheading 1517 90 91 or as an inedible mixture of vegetable oils under CN subheading 1518 00 31, all the factors relevant to the case must be taken into account, in so far as they relate to the objective characteristics and properties inherent in that product. Among the relevant factors which may justify the classification of such a mixture as ‘inedible’, account should be taken of the information provided by the producer of that mixture in the context of the customs declaration, according to which, because of the characteristics of the process for its production, the presence of noxious substances in that mixture cannot be excluded. In that regard, the fact that an analysis of samples taken from such a mixture of vegetable oils has not shown that it contains any noxious substance does not suffice, by itself, to call into question the classification of the mixture in question as ‘inedible’. Such a consequence presupposes the existence of other relevant evidence capable of calling into question the accuracy of the information relating to the process for the production of the mixture in question, provided by its producer and included in that declaration, in accordance with Articles 62, 68 and 71 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 of 12 October 1992 establishing the Community Customs Code, as amended by Regulation (EC) No 648/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 April 2005.

---

(1)  OJ C 245, 27.7.2015.

1

---
|   | EXHIBIT      31.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY      ACT |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                              |                                                                            |                               |
|-----------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------|
|                              | UNITED      MORTGAGE TRUST                                                      |
|                         |                                                                       |                          |
| Date: November      14, 2008 | By                                                                    | /s/ Christine      A. Griffin |
|                              | President,  Chief      Executive Officer and Chief Financial  Officer |
# C_2016402EN.01000701.xml

| 31.10.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 402/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.10.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 402/7

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 8 September 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden — Netherlands) — GS Media BV v Sanoma Media Netherlands BV, Playboy Enterprises International Inc., Britt Geertruida Dekker

(Case C-160/15) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Copyright and related rights - Directive 2001/29/EC - Information society - Harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights - Article 3(1) - Communication to the public - Definition - Internet - Hyperlinks giving access to protected works, made accessible on another website without the rightholder’s consent - Works not yet published by the rightholder - Posting of such links for a profit))

(2016/C 402/08)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Referring court

Hoge Raad der Nederlanden

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: GS Media BV

Applicant:

Defendants: Sanoma Media Netherlands BV, Playboy Enterprises International Inc., Britt Geertruida Dekker

Defendants:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 3(1) of Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society must be interpreted as meaning that, in order to establish whether the fact of posting, on a website, hyperlinks to protected works, which are freely available on another website without the consent of the copyright holder, constitutes a ‘communication to the public’ within the meaning of that provision, it is to be determined whether those links are provided without the pursuit of financial gain by a person who did not know or could not reasonably have known the illegal nature of the publication of those works on that other website or whether, on the contrary, those links are provided for such a purpose, a situation in which that knowledge must be presumed.

---

(1)  OJ C 205, 22.6.2015.

1

---
Order entered November 20 , 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 13
- 00119
- CR RYAN WALLACE, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 265th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F10
- 73110
- R



### O RDER On October 18, 2013, this Court ordered the Dallas County District Clerk to file, within fifteen days a supplemental record containing the cost bill and other documents. To date, we have not received the supplemental clerk’s record. Accordingly, we ORDER the Dallas County District Clerk to file, within TEN DAYS of the date of this order, a supplemental clerk’s record containing a detailed itemization of the costs assessed in this case, including but not limited to, specific co urt costs, fees, and court appointed attorney fees. In accordance with Texas Code of Criminal Procedure article 103.001, the cost bill shall be signed by the officer who charged the cost or the officer who is entitled to receive payment for the cost. We further ORDER that the supplemental clerk’s record include adocument explaining any and all abbreviations used to designate a particular fee, cost, or court

appointed attorney fee.
We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmissi on, to Gary Fitzsimmons, Dallas County District Clerk; Dallas County District Clerk’s Office, Criminal Records Division; and to counsel for all parties.

/s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
December 29, 1970

No. 70-70

#### Johnnie R. Armes, Formerly PVT, U. S. Army v United States.

ORDERED:

That said Amended Petition be, and the same is, hereby dismissed.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Union Tank Car Company (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
period ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mark J. Garrette, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In witness whereof, I have executed this certification as of the 15thday of May, 2006.



/s/ Mark J. GarretteMark J. GarrettePrincipal Financial Officer
p130201.eng

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT PMN: 13-0201 Focus Ready Draft 1/31/2013

ENGINEER: Choudhary \ EV PV (kg/yr):

SUBMITTER:

USE:

Page 1p130201.eng

SAT (concerns) (01/18/2013): Migration to groundwater: Slow PBT rating: P2B1T1 Health: 2 Dermal, Inhalation Eco: 3 Water (All releases to water with a CC = 5 ppb), XB Testing (No Testing desired)

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 1D

NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS: Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER.

Page 2p130201.eng

Page 3p130201.eng

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT PMN: 13-0201

Page 4p130201.eng

concentration.

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT PMN: 13-0201

Page 5p130201.eng

Page 6
### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN

NO. 03-0 7 -00 528 -CR

In r e St e r ling She par d

F ROM THE DISTRICT CO URT OF TRAVIS COUNTY , 147TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 9034 124 , HO NORAB LE WI LF ORD F LOW ERS , JUDGE PRESIDI NG

M E M O R

A N D U M O P I N I O N Appellant Sterling Shepard w as convic ted for posse ssing more than four g rams of
coca ine. This conviction was a ffirme d. Se e Sh e pa rd v . S tat e , No. 03-04-00038- CR, 2006 Te x . App. L E X I S 2 7 9 3 ( T e x. A p p . — A u s ti n , A p r . 6 , 2 0 0 6 , p e t. r e f ’ d ) ( me m. o p . , n o t d e s igna ted for publication). On June 22, 2007, Shepard f iled a pro se motion for fore nsic DNA te sting of the bag in which the coc aine wa s found. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc
. Ann. art. 64.01 (West Supp. 2007). The district court denie d the motion in a written order dated Aug ust 10, 2007, and this appea l followed.

Shepard repr esents himself on appea l. On Dec ember 10, 2007, Shepard w as notified that his brief wa s overdue and advise d that if he did not respond by J anua ry 11, 2008, the appe al would be submitted for de cision without briefs. See Tex. R. App. P . 38.8(b). Shepa rd has not filed a brie f or other

wise re sponded to the Court’s notice. The district cour

t concluded tha t Shepard ha d not established by a preponde ranc e of t h e e v i d en ce t h at h e w o u l d n o th av e b ee n co n v i ct ed i f ex cu l p at o ry re s u l t s h ad b ee n o b t ai n ed t h ro u gh2

DNA testing
. See Tex. Code Crim. P roc. A nn. art. 64.03(a )(2) (A) ( West S upp. 2007). This c o n c lu s io n is s u

p p o rte d b y th e r e c o r d
. We f in d n o e r r o r th a t s h o u ld b e c o n s ide red in the interest of justice.

The orde r deny

ing f orensic D NA testing is affirme d.

__________________________________________ Bob Pembe rton, J ustice Be fore Chief J ustice L aw, Justi ces Pembe rton and Waldrop Affir med Filed: Mar ch 12, 2008 Do No t Pu

bli sh
ROBERT REID,

Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF 

CORRECTIONS, STATE OF 

FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D13-5739

_____________________________/

Opinion filed September 4, 2014.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County.

Kevin J. Carroll, Judge.

Robert Reid, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Shirley Durham, Assistant Attorney General, 

Jennifer Parker, General Counsel for Department of Corrections, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

PADOVANO, WETHERELL, and MAKAR, JJ., CONCUR.