alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Motion Granted; Petition for Writ of Mandamus Dismissed; and

Memorandum Opinion filed January 9, 2014

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 13

- 00956

- CV

IN RE PATRICIA A. MI LLARD , Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 133rd District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2011

- 12131



### MEMORANDUM OPINION
On October 28, 2013, relator Patricia A. Millard filed a petition for writ of

m andamus in this Court. See Tex. Gov’t Code § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this Court to compel the Honorable Jaclanel McFarland, presiding judge of the 133rd District Court of Harris County
, to vacate a discovery order dated on or about August 13, 2013

.2

On December 18 , 2013, relator filed a motion to dismiss her petition for writ of mandamus. We grant the motion and dismiss relator’s petition for writ of
mandamus.

PER CURIAM

Panel Consist s of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Boyce and Jamison.
III 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 280 

Supporting ‘‘Lights On Afterschool!’’, a national celebration of after school 

programs. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 19, 2005 

Mr. DODD (for himself, Mr. ENSIGN, Mr. AKAKA, Mrs. BOXER, Mr. BURNS, 

Mr. BURR, Ms. CANTWELL, Mr. CARPER, Mrs. CLINTON, Mr. COCHRAN, 

Ms. COLLINS, Mr. CORNYN, Mr. CORZINE, Mr. DAYTON, Mr. DURBIN, 

Mr. FEINGOLD, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, Mr. INOUYE, Mr. KERRY, Mr. KOHL, 

Ms. LANDRIEU, Mr. LAUTENBERG, Mr. LEVIN, Mr. LIEBERMAN, Ms. MIKULSKI, Ms. MURKOWSKI, Mrs. MURRAY, Mr. NELSON of Nebraska, Mr. 

REID, Mr. SALAZAR, Ms. SNOWE, Mr. SPECTER, and Ms. STABENOW) 

submitted the following resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting ‘‘Lights On Afterschool!’’, a national celebration 

of after school programs. 

Whereas high quality after school programs provide safe, 

challenging, engaging, and fun learning experiences to 

help children and youth develop their social, emotional, 

physical, cultural, and academic skills; 

Whereas high quality after school programs support working 

families by ensuring that the children in such families are 

safe and productive after the regular school day ends; 

Whereas high quality after school programs build stronger 

communities by involving the Nation’s students, parents, 
2 

•SRES 280 ATS

business leaders, and adult volunteers in the lives of the 

Nation’s youth, thereby promoting positive relationships 

among children, youth, families, and adults; 

Whereas high quality after school programs engage families, 

schools, and diverse community partners in advancing the 

well-being of the Nation’s children; 

Whereas ‘‘Lights On Afterschool!’’, a national celebration of 

after school programs held on October 20, 2005, promotes the critical importance of high quality after school 

programs in the lives of children, their families, and their 

communities; 

Whereas more than 28,000,000 children in the United States 

have parents who work outside the home and 14,300,000 

children in the United States have no place to go after 

school; and 

Whereas many after school programs across the United 

States are struggling to keep their doors open and their 

lights on: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate supports the goals and 

2 ideals of ‘‘Lights On Afterschool!’’ a national celebration 

3 of after school programs. 

Æ
# C_2016335EN.01001602.xml

| 12.9.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 335/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.9.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 335/16

---

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 30 June 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de première instance de Liège — Belgium) — Guy Riskin, Geneviève Timmermans v État belge

(Case C-176/15) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Free movement of capital - Articles 63 and 65 TFEU - Article 4 TEU - Direct taxation - Taxation of dividends - Bilateral convention for the avoidance of double taxation - Third State - Scope))

(2016/C 335/21)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunal de première instance de Liège

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Guy Riskin, Geneviève Timmermans

Applicants:

Defendant: État belge

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Articles 63 TFEU and 65 TFEU, read in conjunction with Article 4 TEU, must be interpreted as not precluding a Member State from not extending, in a situation such as that at issue in the main proceedings, the benefit of the advantageous treatment accorded to a resident shareholder as a result of a bilateral double taxation convention concluded between that Member State and a third State — by which tax deducted at source by the third State is allowed unconditionally as a credit against tax payable in the shareholder’s Member State of residence — to a resident shareholder in receipt of dividends from a Member State with which that Member State of residence has concluded a bilateral double taxation convention under which the granting of such a set-off is subject to compliance with additional conditions provided for by national law.

---

(1)  OJ C 221, 6.7.2015.

1

---
Exhibit 8.1

Subsidiaries of Talend SA

 

|                                             |                     |                                                                  |
|--------------------------------------------------|--------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Name of Subsidiary                     |      | State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation |
|                                             |                     |                                                                  |
| Talend Australia Pty Ltd.                        |                     | Australia                                                             |
| Talend Beijing Technology Co. Ltd.               |                     | China                                                                 |
| Talend (Canada) Limited                          |                     | Canada                                                                |
| Talend Germany GmbH                              |                     | Germany                                                               |
| Talend GmbH                                      |                     | Switzerland                                                           |
| Talend, Inc.                                     |                     | United States                                                         |
| Talend Italy S.r.l.                              |                     | Italy                                                                 |
| Talend KK                                        |                     | Japan                                                                 |
| Talend Limited                                   |                     | Ireland                                                               |
| Talend Limited                                   |                     | United Kingdom                                                        |
| Talend Netherlands BV                            |                     | Netherlands                                                           |
| Talend Singapore Pte. Ltd.                       |                     | Singapore                                                             |
| Talend Sweden AB                                 |                     | Sweden                                                                |
| Talend USA, Inc.                                 |                     | United States of America                                              |
| Talend Spain, SL                                 |                     | Spain                                                                 |
| Talend Data Integration Services Private Limited |                     | India                                                                 |

 

----
III 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 622 

Supporting the goals and ideals of a ‘‘National Children and Families Day’’, 

as established by the National Children’s Museum, on the fourth Saturday of June. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 5, 2006 

Mr. WARNER (for himself and Mr. ALLEN) submitted the following resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and 

Pensions 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting the goals and ideals of a ‘‘National Children 

and Families Day’’, as established by the National Children’s Museum, on the fourth Saturday of June. 

Whereas research shows that spending time together as a 

family is critical to raising strong and resilient kids; 

Whereas strong healthy families improve the quality of life 

and development of children; 

Whereas it is essential to celebrate and reflect upon the important role that all families play in the lives of children 

and in the future of the United States; and 

Whereas the country’s greatest natural resource is its children: Now, therefore, be it 


pwalker on PRODPC60 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 622 IS 

1 Resolved, That the Senate supports the goals and 

2 ideals of a ‘‘National Children and Families Day’’ on the 

3 fourth Saturday of June, as established by the National 

4 Children’s Museum, to— 

5 (1) encourage adults to support, listen to, and 

6 encourage children throughout the United States so 

7 that those children may achieve their hopes and 

8 dreams; 

9 (2) reflect upon the important role that all fam10 ilies play in the lives of children; and 

11 (3) recognize that strong, healthy families im12 prove the quality of life and development of children. 

Æ 


pwalker on PRODPC60 with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-6829

TERRY ALAN MCCLURE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

PAM CALDWELL, Prison House Services; AL

CANNON, Sheriff; CHARLESTON COUNTY DETENTION

CENTER; PRISON HOUSE SERVICES,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Columbia. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District

Judge. (CA-04-21813)

Submitted: October 20, 2005 Decided: October 27, 2005

Before NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Terry Alan McClure, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Holmes Hood, Robert

Holmes Hood, Jr., Roy Pearce Maybank, HOOD LAW FIRM, Charleston,

South Carolina; Stephanie Pendarvis McDonald, Charleston, South

Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Terry Alan McClure appeals the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on

the reasoning of the district court. See McClure v. Caldwell, No.

CA-04-21813 (D.S.C. May 5, 2005). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Case: 2:12-cv-01186-EAS-EPD Doc #: 56 Filed: 11/15/13 Page: 1 of 1  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-08T17:53:09-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
1

 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

 FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

 EASTERN DIVISION 

MARK A. JOHNSON, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. Civil Action 2:12-cv-1123 

 Judge Graham 

 Magistrate Judge King 

STATE FARM FIRE AND 

CASUALTY COMPANY, 

 Defendant. 

 ORDER

 Upon unopposed motion, Doc. No. 13, this action is STAYED pending 

resolution of the related criminal matter, State of Ohio v. Mark A. 

Johnson, Case No. 2013 CR 00073 (Fairfield Co. Ct. Comm. Pl.). 

 The parties shall promptly notify this Court upon the resolution 

of the related criminal case. 

 s/Norah McCann King 

 Norah McCann King 

 United States Magistrate Judge 

Date: March 8, 2013 

Case: 2:12-cv-01123-JLG-NMK Doc #: 14 Filed: 03/08/13 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE:

APPOINTMENT TO THE CRIMINAL

PROCEDURAL RULES COMMITTEE :

:

:

: No. 526

CRIMINAL PROCEDURAL RULES

DOCKET

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 29 th day of October , 2020, Stefanie J. Salavantis, Esquire,

Luzerne County, is hereby appointed as a member of the Criminal Procedural Rules

Committee for a term of four years, commencing January 1, 2021.
EX-4.1





 Exhibit 4.1 
  






 
 FULTON FINANCIAL CORPORATION INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA PAR VALUE $2.50
PER SHARE COMMON STOCK COMMON STOCK THIS CERTIFIES that is the owner of CUSIP 360271 10 0 SHARE(S) of the full-paid and non-assessable common stock of FULTON FINANCIAL CORPORATION transferable only on the books of the Corporation by the holder
hereof in person, or by duly authorized attorney, upon the surrender of this certificate properly endorsed. This certificate is not valid unless countersigned by the Transfer Agent. WITNESS the facsimile seal of the Corporation and the facsimile
signatures of its duly authorized officers. Countersigned: FULTON FINANCIAL ADVISORS DIVISION OF FULTON BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION LANCASTER, PENNSYLVANIA Transfer Agent By: Authorized Signature Dated SECRETARY CHAIRMAN, PRESIDENT AND CEO













 



 
 FULTON FINANCIAL CORPORATION The Corporation will furnish to any shareholder without charge and upon request, a full or summary
statement of (1) the designations, preferences, limitations, and relative rights of the shares of each class of stock authorized to be issued, (2) the variations in the relative rights and preferences between the shares of each series of Preferred
Stock so far as the same have been fixed and determined, and (3) the authority of the Board of Directors to fix and determine the relative rights and preferences of subsequent series of Preferred Stock. Explanation of Abbreviations The following
abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this certificate, shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations: Phrase Abbreviation Equivalent Phrase Abbreviation Equivalent TEN
COM TEN ENT JTTEN - as tenants in common - husband and wife as tenants by the entireties - as joint tenants, with right of UNIFTRAN MIN ACT- Custodian (Cust) (Minor) under Uniform Transfers to Minors survivorship and not as tenants in common
Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list. Act (State) Signature(s): NOTICE: The signature to this assignment must correspond with the name as written upon the face of the certificate in every particular, without
alteration or enlargement or any change whatever. THE SIGNATURE(S) SHOULD BE GUARANTEED BY AN ELIGIBLE GUARANTOR INSTITUTION (BANKS, STOCKBROKERS, SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATIONS AND CREDIT UNIONS WITH MEMBERSHIP IN AN APPROVED SIGNATURE GUARANTEE
MEDALLION PROGRAM), PURSUANT TO SEC RULE 17Ad-15. For value received, hereby sell, assign and transfer into Please insert social security or other identifying number of assignee PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS INCLUDING POSTAL ZIP CODE OF
ASSIGNEE Shares of the capital stock represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint Attorney to transfer the said stock on the books of the within-named Corporation with full power of substitution in the
premises Dated,
##### 



EXHIBIT 32
 Certification by the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
Relating to a Periodic Report Containing Financial Statements
  (1)
    
    The Companys periodic report on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31,
2007 (the Form 10-Q) fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
    
    
    
    CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER/s/ David W. Trego
    
    
    
    /s/ John C. BarneyDavid W. Trego
    
    
    
    John C. BarneyDate: February 8, 2008
    
    
    
    Date: February 8, 2008
# Official Journal C 89A/13 A

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 89A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4813 April 2005 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 89A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4813 April 2005

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | Corrigenda |
| | |
| 2005/C 089A/1 | Corrigendum to the notice of open competitions:EPSO/AD/4/04 to constitute a reserve of administrators (A*7) for citizens of the following Member States: Cyprus, Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Lithuania, Latvia, Malta, Poland, Slovenia and Slovakia in the field of European public administrationEPSO/AST/2/04 to constitute a reserve of assistants (B*3) for citizens of the following Member States: Cyprus, Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Lithuania, Latvia, Malta, Poland, Slovenia and Slovakia in the fields of European public administration/human resources and financial managementEPSO/AST/3/04 to constitute a reserve of assistants (B*3) for citizens of the following Member States: Cyprus, Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Lithuania, Latvia, Malta, Poland, Slovenia and Slovakia in the field of Information Technology(OJ C 317 A of 22.12.2004) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

Corrigenda

2005/C 089A/1

Corrigendum to the notice of open competitions:EPSO/AD/4/04 to constitute a reserve of administrators (A*7) for citizens of the following Member States: Cyprus, Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Lithuania, Latvia, Malta, Poland, Slovenia and Slovakia in the field of European public administrationEPSO/AST/2/04 to constitute a reserve of assistants (B*3) for citizens of the following Member States: Cyprus, Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Lithuania, Latvia, Malta, Poland, Slovenia and Slovakia in the fields of European public administration/human resources and financial managementEPSO/AST/3/04 to constitute a reserve of assistants (B*3) for citizens of the following Member States: Cyprus, Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Lithuania, Latvia, Malta, Poland, Slovenia and Slovakia in the field of Information Technology(OJ C 317 A of 22.12.2004)

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
# C_2015138EN.01001201.xml

| 27.4.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 138/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.4.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 138/12

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 4 March 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato — Italy) — Ministero dell’Ambiente e della Tutela del Territorio e del Mare and Others v Fipa Group Srl, Tws Automation Srl, Ivan Srl

(Case C-534/13) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 191(2) TFEU - Directive 2004/35/EC - Environmental liability - National legislation under which no provision is made for the administrative authorities to require owners of polluted land who have not contributed to that pollution to carry out preventive and remedial measures, and the sole obligation imposed concerns the reimbursement of the measures undertaken by those authorities - Whether compatible with the ‘polluter pays’ principle, the precautionary principle and the principles that preventive action should be taken and that environmental damage should be rectified at source as a matter of priority))

(2015/C 138/14)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Referring court

Consiglio di Stato

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellants: Ministero dell’Ambiente e della Tutela del Territorio e del Mare, Ministero della Salute, Ispra — Istituto Superiore per la Protezione e la Ricerca Ambientale

Appellants:

Respondents: Fipa Group Srl, Tws Automation Srl, Ivan Srl

Respondents:

Intervening parties: Comune di Massa, Regione Toscana, Provincia di Massa Carrara, Comune di Carrara, Agenzia regionale per la protezione ambientale della Toscana (ARPAT), Ediltecnica Srl, Versalis SpA, Edison SpA

Intervening parties:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Directive 2004/35/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004 on environmental liability with regard to the prevention and remedying of environmental damage must be interpreted as not precluding national legislation such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which, in cases where it is impossible to identify the polluter of a plot of land or to have that person adopt remedial measures, does not permit the competent authority to require the owner of the land (who is not responsible for the pollution) to adopt preventive and remedial measures, that person being required merely to reimburse the costs relating to the measures undertaken by the competent authority within the limit of the market value of the site, determined after those measures have been carried out.

---

(1)  OJ C 359, 7.12.2013.

1

---
Exhibit 12



             United Air Lines, Inc. and Subsidiary Companies

            Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                               Nine Months Ended
                                                  September 30
                                               -----------------
                                                1999       1998
                                                ----       ----
                                                 (In Millions)
<S>                                          <C>        <C>
Earnings:

 Earnings before income taxes                $ 1,711    $ 1,146
 Fixed charges, from below                       766        742
 Undistributed earnings of affiliates            (26)       (53)
 Interest capitalized                            (56)       (82)
                                              ------     ------
     Earnings                                $ 2,395    $ 1,753
                                              ======     ======

Fixed charges:

 Interest expense                            $   280    $   270
 Portion of rental expense representative
   of the interest factor                        486        472
                                              ------     ------
     Fixed charges                           $   766    $   742
                                              ======     ======

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges              3.13       2.36
                                              ======     ======

</TABLE>