alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v FRANK A. NOSSAVAGE, Recruit, U. S. Army, Appellant

12 USCMA 549, 31 CMR 135

No. 15,139

November 24, 1961

*Captain Samuel J. Rozel*argued the cause for Appellant, Accused. With him on the brief was *Colonel W. H. Blackmarr.*

*First Lieutenant Alvin B. Fox*argued the cause for Appellee, United States. With him on the brief were *Lieutenant Colonel James G. Mc-Conaughy, Major Francis M. Cooper,*and *First Lieutenant Jerome Nelson.*

Opinion of the Court

Quinn, Chief Judge:

The decision of the board of review is affirmed. United States v Forwerck, 12 USCMA 540, 31 CMR 126.

Judge Kilday concurs.

Ferguson, Judge

(dissenting) :

I dissent for the reasons set forth in my separate opinion in United States v Forewerek, 12 USCMA 540, 31 CMR 126, this day decided.
(Reap. Dec. 9374)

#### Zewo Manufacturing Works, Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. W-70223.

(Decided April 2, 1959)

Plaintiff not represented by counsel.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Lawrence, Judge:

When the above-enumerated appeal for a reappraisement was called for hearing, there was no appearance on behalf of plaintiff.

*588An examination of the official record discloses no reason for disturbing the presumptively correct value for the merchandise found by the appraiser.

I, therefore, find and hold the proper dutiable value of the merchandise covered by said appeal to be the value found by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
# C_2018013EN.01000901.xml

| 15.1.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 13/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.1.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 13/9

---

Order of the President of the Second Chamber of the Court of 4 October 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Judecătoria Câmpulung — Romania) — Dumitru Gavrilescu, Liana Gavrilescu v SC Banca Transilvania SA, formerly SC Volksbank România SA, SC Volksbank România SA — sucursala Câmpulung

(Case C-627/15) (1)

1

(2018/C 013/11)

Language of the case: Romanian

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 165, 10.5.2016.

1

---
No. 56630.

protest 160755-K (San Francisco).

#### Zachary Z. Honigberg *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protest.
No. 48074.

#### Protests 861685-G, etc., of Henry Pollak, Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of *United States*v. *Armand Schwab*(30 C. C. P. A. 72, C. A. D. 218) certain of the hemp hats in question were held dutiable under paragraph 1504 (b) (1) as claimed.
21 December 2011

Tel: (202) 588

- 6696

Fax: (202) 588

- 7901

E

- mail: Judith.Ritchie @ fco.gov.uk

Mr Paul Gretch

Director

Office of International Aviation

US Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Avenue SE

Washington DC 20590

Dear Paul,

CHARTER OPERATIONS BETWEEN THE UNITED KINGDOM AND THE UNITED

STATES OF AMERICA

This letter is to confirm that the UK Government, on the basis of reciprocity, will

approve requests from US

- designated airlines to perform fifth, sixth and seventh

freedom charter operations on the understanding that the US Government will approve

similar requests from UK

- designated airlines.

The UK Government also confirms that approv al for similar charter operations by US

airlines to the UK's Overseas Territories will also be granted, where reciprocity applies.

Yours sincerely,

Judith

Judith Ritchie

First Secretary (Transport Policy)

cc: Mary Street, DoT

James Gilderoy, DfT Lond on
**Certification of the Chief Financial OfficerPursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)**

              I, Frederic F. Brace, the Executive Vice President and Chief FinancialOfficer of United Air Lines, Inc. (the "Company") certify that to the bestof my knowledge, based upon a review of the quarterly report on Form 10-Qfor the period ended March 31, 2005 of the Company (the "Report"):(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofthe Company. /s/ Frederic F. Brace________Frederic F. BraceUnited Air Lines. Inc.Executive Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerMay 20, 2005
# C_2015302EN.01001801.xml

| 14.9.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 302/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.9.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 302/18

---

Action brought on 19 June 2015 — European Commission v United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

(Case C-304/15)

(2015/C 302/23)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: K. Mifsud-Bonnici, S. Petrova, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

Defendant:

The applicant claims that the Court should:

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | declare that, by failing to correctly apply the Directive 2001/80/EC on the limitation of emissions of certain pollutants into the air from large combustion plants (1) with regard to the Aberthaw Power Station in Wales, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 4(3), read in conjunction with Annex VI, Part A, of Directive 2001/80/EC on the limitation of emissions of certain pollutants into the air from large combustion plants; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by failing to correctly apply the Directive 2001/80/EC on the limitation of emissions of certain pollutants into the air from large combustion plants (1) with regard to the Aberthaw Power Station in Wales, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 4(3), read in conjunction with Annex VI, Part A, of Directive 2001/80/EC on the limitation of emissions of certain pollutants into the air from large combustion plants;

1

| — | order the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The Commission takes the view that the United Kingdom has failed to correctly apply Article 4(3), read in conjunction with Part A of Annex VI to the Directive 2001/80/EC on the limitation of emissions of certain pollutants into the air from large combustion plants with regard to the Aberthaw Power Station. The Aberthaw Power Station, a coal-fired combustion plant with a rated thermal input of 4  090 MWth, thus entering the category of installations with a capacity exceeding 500 MWth, exceeds the applicable emission limit value for nitrogen oxides (NOx) under Article 4(3) of the said Directive as read together with its Article 14(1)(a) and Annex VI, Part A. Pursuant to the applicable provisions, the United Kingdom must ensure that a plant of this capacity, from 1 January 2008, does not exceed the limit value of 500 mg/Nm3 for NOx, reducing it to 200 mg/Nm3 as of January 2016. However, the plant’s emission limit value as set out in its permit is currently 1  050 mg/Nm3 for NOx.

---

(1)  OJ L 309, p. 1

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000101295
<NAME> UNITED-GUARDIAN, INC.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                       1,016,550
<SECURITIES>                                 3,465,881
<RECEIVABLES>                                  914,782
<ALLOWANCES>                                    54,949
<INVENTORY>                                  1,465,292
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,236,872
<PP&E>                                       4,787,674
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,476,222
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,792,442
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          376,867
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       490,074
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,915,501
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,792,442
<SALES>                                      7,795,787
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,795,787
<CGS>                                        3,791,152
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,791,152
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 354
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,519,687
<INCOME-TAX>                                   940,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,579,687
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,579,687
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .32


</TABLE>
# C_2016016EN.01001301.xml

| 18.1.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 16/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.1.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 16/13

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 19 November 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Varbergs tingsrätt — Sweden) — P v Q

(Case C-455/15 PPU) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Urgent preliminary ruling procedure - Judicial cooperation in civil matters - Jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of judgments in matrimonial matters and in matters of parental responsibility - Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 - Article 23(a) - Grounds of non-recognition of judgments in matters of parental responsibility - Public policy))

(2016/C 016/15)

Language of the case: Swedish

Referring court

Referring court

Varbergs tingsrätt

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: P

Applicant:

Defendant: Q

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 23(a) of Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 of 27 November 2003 concerning jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in matrimonial matters and the matters of parental responsibility, repealing Regulation (EC) No 1347/2000, must be interpreted as meaning that, in the absence of a manifest breach, having regard to the best interests of the child, of a rule of law regarded as essential in the legal order of a Member State or of a right recognised as being fundamental within that legal order, that provision does not allow a court of that Member State which considers that it has jurisdiction to rule on the custody of a child to refuse to recognise a judgment of a court of another Member State which has ruled on the custody of that child.

---

(1)  OJ C 346, 19.10.2015.

1

---
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 80 (Thursday, April 26, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 20888]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-7775]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Veterans' Employment and Training Service


The Advisory Committee on Veterans' Employment Training and 
Employer Outreach; Notice of Open Meeting

    The Advisory Committee on Veterans' Employment Training and 
Employer Outreach (ACVETEO) was established pursuant to Title II of the 
Veterans' Housing Opportunity and Benefits Improvement Act of 2006 
(Pub. L. 109-233) and Section 9 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(FACA) (Pub. L. 92-462, Title 5 U.S.C. app.II). The ACVETEO's authority 
is codified in Title 38 U.S. Code, Section 4110. The ACVETEO's Charter 
was signed and transmitted to the Congress on March 16, 2007.
    The ACVETEO is responsible for assessing employment and training 
needs of veterans; determining the extent to which the programs and 
activities of the Department of Labor meet these needs; and assisting 
in carrying out outreach to employers seeking to hire veterans.
    The Advisory Committee on Veterans' Employment Training and 
Employer Outreach will meet on Tuesday, May 15th from 8 a.m. to 4 p.m. 
at the U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., 
Washington DC (202-693-4700). The committee will discuss programs 
assisting veterans seeking employment and raising employer awareness as 
to the advantages of hiring veterans.
    Individuals needing special accommodations should notify Bill 
Offutt at (202) 693-4717 by May 7, 2007.

    Signed in Washington, DC, this 16th day of April 2007.
John McWilliam,
Deputy Assistant Secretary, Veterans' Employment and Training.
[FR Doc. E7-7775 Filed 4-25-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-79-P
No. 56129.

protests 132914-K and 133848-K (New York).

#### R. C. Williams & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

For the reasons stated in *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C. D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
# L_2004348EN.01S00301.xml

| 24.11.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 348/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.11.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 348/s3

---

1 November 2004 — New version of EUR-Lex!

europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex/

The new site incorporates the Celex service and provides free and easy access in 20 languages to the largest documentary database on EU law.

---
Before the Second Division,

September 1, 1943

No. 48699.

#### Protests 10971-K, etc., of Consolidated Hat Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

At the trial a witness testified on behalf of the plaintiff that certain items in question were the same in all material respects as those involved in *Caradine*v. *United States*(9 Cust. Ct. 69, C. D. 664). In accordance therewith the claim at 25 percent under paragraph 1504 (b) (5) was sustained as to those items.
# C_2016462EN.01000502.xml

| 12.12.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 462/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.12.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 462/5

---

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 12 October 2016 — Land Hessen v Pollmeier Massivholz GmbH & Co. KG, European Commission

(Case C-242/15 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - State aid - State measures concerning the establishment of a sawmill in the Land of Hessen - Decision finding no State aid - Failure to initiate the formal investigation procedure - Serious difficulties - Calculation of the aid element of State guarantees - Commission Notice on State aid in the form of guarantees))

(2016/C 462/07)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Land Hessen (represented by: U. Soltész and A. Richter, Rechtsanwälte)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: Pollmeier Massivholz GmbH & Co. KG (represented by: J. Heithecker and J. Ylinen, Rechtsanwälte), European Commission (represented by: F. Erlbacher and C. Urraca Caviedes, Agents)

Other parties to the proceedings:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders Land Hessen to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Land Hessen to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 236, 20.7.2015.

1

---
# C_2018022EN.01000301.xml

| 22.1.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 22/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.1.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 22/3

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 23 November 2017 — Bionorica SE (C-596/15 P), Diapharm GmbH & Co. KG (C-597/15 P) v European Commission

(Joined Cases C-596/15 P and C-597/15 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - Public health - Consumer protection - Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 - Health claims on foods - Article 13(3) - List of permitted health claims on foods - Botanical substances - Claims on hold - Action for failure to act - Article 265 TFEU - Defined position of the European Commission - Interest in bringing proceedings - Locus standi))

(2018/C 022/03)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Appellants: Bionorica SE (C-596/15 P), Diapharm GmbH & Co. KG (C-597/15 P) (represented by: M. Weidner, T. Guttau and N. Hußmann, Rechtsanwälte)

Appellants:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: S. Grünheid and M. Wilderspin, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Sets aside the order of the General Court of the European Union of 16 September 2015, Bionorica v Commission (T-619/14, not published, EU:T:2015:723); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Sets aside the order of the General Court of the European Union of 16 September 2015, Bionorica v Commission (T-619/14, not published, EU:T:2015:723);

| 2. | Dismisses the action for failure to act lodged by Bionorica SE in Case T-619/14 as inadmissible; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the action for failure to act lodged by Bionorica SE in Case T-619/14 as inadmissible;

| 3. | Dismisses the appeal in Case C-597/15 P; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Dismisses the appeal in Case C-597/15 P;

| 4. | Orders Bionorica SE and the Commission each to bear their own costs incurred both at first instance in Case T-619/14 and on appeal in Case C-596/15 P; |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders Bionorica SE and the Commission each to bear their own costs incurred both at first instance in Case T-619/14 and on appeal in Case C-596/15 P;

| 5. | Orders Diapharm GmbH & Co. KG to pay the costs incurred on appeal in Case C-597/15 P. |
| --- | --- |

5.

Orders Diapharm GmbH & Co. KG to pay the costs incurred on appeal in Case C-597/15 P.

---

(1)  OJ C 16, 18.1.2016.

1

---
Before the Third Division,

April 26, 1944

No. 49381.

#### Petition 6314-R of Wing Lee Co. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

From the testimony of the witness for the petitioner it was found that the commercial invoice was written in the Chinese language but he checked the prices on the commercial invoice with the Chinese importer and found they were the same as on the consular invoice, and that the importer stated the prices were those freely offered. Previous to making entry an effort was made to secure information from the appraiser as to the value of the merchandise in question but the appraiser reported “unable to identify the goods on brands prior to examination.” He received no notice from the customs authorities that the prices were incorrect until he received a notice of advance. He had never before made entry of like merchandise. On the record the court found that the entry was made without intention to misrepresent the facts or defraud the revenue of the United States, or to deceive the appraiser. The petition was therefore
Exhibit 15
                                                               
                                                               




Tucson Electric Power Company
220 West Sixth Street
Tucson, Arizona  85701

We have made a review, in accordance with standards established
by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, of
the unaudited interim financial information of Tucson Electric
Power Company and subsidiaries (the Company) for the three-
month periods ended March 31, 1997 and 1996, as
indicated in our report dated May 2, 1997; because we did not
perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on that information.

We are aware that our report referred to above, which is
included in your Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended March 31, 1997, is incorporated by reference in
Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement No. 33-
55732 of the Company on Form S-3, Registration Statement No. 33-
58173 of UniSource Energy Corporation on Form S-4, and
Registration Statements No. 33-56523, No. 33-57233 and No. 33-
57231 of the Company on Form S-8.

We are also aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to
Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered
a part of the Registration Statement prepared or certified by
an accountant or a report prepared or certified by an
accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.



DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

May 12, 1997
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsMicrowave performance of an optically controlled AlGaAs/GaAs high electron mobility transistor and GaAs MESFETDirect current and also the microwave characteristics of optically illuminated AlGaAs/GaAs HEMT are experimentally measured for the first time and compared with that of GaAs MESFET. The results showed that the average increase in the gain is 2.89 dB under 1.7 nW/sq cm optical intensity at 0.83 microns. Further, the effect of illumination on S-parameters is more pronounced when the devices are biased close to pinch off. Novel applications of optically illuminated HEMT as a variable gain amplifier, high speed high frequency photo detector, and mixer are demonstrated.Document ID19870008560Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference PaperAuthorsSimons, Rainee N.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Bhasin, Kul. B.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1987Subject CategoryElectronics And Electrical EngineeringReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:88980NASA-TM-88980E-3333Accession Number87N17993Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 506-44-21Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19870008560.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024