alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
01/31/2013 14 38 FAX 202 2675106

l(): 

### OFFICE OF THE CHIEF COUNSEL AGC-300

- ENFORCEMENT DIVISION FEDERAL AVIATIONADMINISTRATION 800 INDEPENDENCEAVENUE, S.W. WASHINGTON, D.C. 20591 202-267-7158 (VOICE) 202-267-5106 (FAX)
FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL SHEET

l'ROM: 

### Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Agnes Rodriguez COMPANY: 

### Federal Aviation Administration FAX NUMBER: 

### 1·202-493·5142 PHONE NUMBER:

RE: 

### Badger Helicopters: W/D Complaint DATE: 

### 01/31/2013 01:28:18 PM TOTAl, NO. OF PAGES INCLUDING COVFR: 

### 3 SENDER'S PHONE NUMBER: 

### 1·202·267-7268 YOUR REFERENCE NUMBER: I4J001/003

DURGENT 

# EJ FOR REVIEW []PLEASE**REC~CL8**
NOT13S/COMMENTS:01/31/2013 14:38 FAX 202 2875108



### U.S. 

### DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION
Inthe matter of: BADGER HELICOPTERS, INC. ) ) ) ) ) FDMS No. FAA-2012-0201 FAA Docket No. Unassigned FAACaseNo. 2011AL910019 Judge Richard C. Goodwin 

### COMPLAINANT'S MOTION TO WITHDRAW AMENDED COMPLAINT Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 13.215 oftheRules ofPractice in Federal Aviation Administration Civil PenaltyActions, the Complainantfiles this motion to withdraw the amended complaint in the above-captioned matter because the Complainant and Respondent litJ 002/003

Badger Helicopters, Inc. have reached a settlement. In light ofthe parties' agreement to settle this matter, the hearing currently scheduled to be held in Rapid City, South Dakota on March 12- 13,2013, is no longernecessary. WHEREFORE, Complainant respectfully requests that the amended complaint be withdrawn, that the hearing scheduled to be held in Rapid City, South DakotaonMarch 12-13, 2013 be cancelled, and that this proceeding be terminated, Date: January 31, 2013 Respectfully submitted, PeterJ. Lynch Assistant ChiefCounsel Enforcement Division, AGC-300

# ~/ll~~= A;SM.**Rodrigu~** Senior Attorney Enforcement Division, AGC-300 Federal Aviation Administration Office ofthe ChiefCounsel 800 Independence Ave., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20591 Telephone: (202) 267-7268 Facsimile: (202) 267-510601/31/2013 14:38 FAX 202 2875108 141003/003

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certifY that onthis date, I have sent byU.S. mail, postageprepaid, certified return-receipt, a copy ofthe foregoing Complainant's Motion to Withdraw Amended Complaint in 

### ln the Maltr.<r of Badger Helicopters, Inc., FDMS No. FAA-2012-0201, FAA Docket No. Unassigned, Case No. 2011AL9100I9, to: Michael Jacob, President Badger Helicopters, Inc. 24564 Hwy 16/385 Custer, SD 57730 

### AND The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 New Jersey Ave., S.E. EastBuilding Ground Floor, RoomEll-310 Washington, DC 20590 Facsimile: 202-366-7536 In addition, I herebycertify that onthis date, I have sent by U.S. mail, postageprepaid, certified return-receipt, the original and one copy oftheforegoing document to: Federal Aviation Administration Orville Wright Building 800 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20591 Attn; Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building- Suite 2WJ 000 Facsimile: 202-493-5142

Date: January 31, 2013
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 08-1205

___________

Roger Day, M.D., *

*

Appellant, *

*

United States of America, *

*

Intervenor, *

*

v. *

*

State of Minnesota; Minnesota Board * Appeal from the United States

of Medical Practice; Steven J. * District Court for the

Altchuler, M.D., PH.D.; Alfred V. * District of Minnesota.

Anderson, M.D., D.C.; Hilda *

Bettermann; Kelli Johnson; Jerry * [UNPUBLISHED]

Kaplan; Ernest W. Lampe, II, M.D.; *

Allen Rasmussen; Kris Sanda; Carl S. *

Smith, M.D.; Jon V. Thomas, M.D.; *

James Langland, M.D.; Barbara *

Letourneau, M.D.; Bradley S. *

Johnson, M.D.; Rebecca Hafner, *

M.D., in their personal capacities and *

in their official capacities as members *

of the Minnesota Board of Medical *

Practice, *

*

Appellees. *

___________

Submitted: October 22, 2009

Filed: November 5, 2009

___________
1

The Honorable Michael J. Davis, Chief Judge, United States District Court for

the District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable

Raymond L. Erickson, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.

2

We decline to address the sovereign immunity issue raised in the intervenor’s

brief filed by the United States. 

-2-

Before MURPHY, COLLOTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Roger J. Day, M.D., appeals the district court’s1

 judgment dismissing his claims

against Minnesota, the Minnesota Board of Medical Practice, and its members, arising

out of their decision not to grant him an unrestricted medical license. Following

careful review, we agree with district court that Day’s discrimination and due process

claims are barred by res judicata, see St. Paul Fire and Marine Ins. Co. v. Compaq

Computer Corp., 539 F.3d 809, 821 (8th Cir. 2008) (law of forum that rendered first

judgment controls res judicata analysis; Minnesota courts review application of res

judicata de novo; setting forth res judicata criteria under Minnesota law), and we find

no basis for reversal.2

 Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. Day’s pending

motion for oral argument is denied. 

______________________________
Exhibit
    15.2       CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM    We have issued
our report dated March 31, 2018 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Integrated Media Technology Limited as
at December 31, 2017, and for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, included in the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year
ended December 31, 2018 which is incorporated by reference in this Registration Statement.  We consent to the incorporation
by reference of the aforementioned report in this Registration Statement and to the use of our name as it appears under the caption
“Experts”.     /s/
HKCMCPA Company Limited   HKCM
                                CPA & Co.
        (Predecessor
        firm: HKCMCPA Company Limited)
        Certified
        Public AccountantsWe
        have served as the Company’s auditor since 2016.Hong
    Kong, ChinaMay
    14, 2019    15th Floor,
Aubin House, 171-172 Gloucester Road, Wan Chai, Hong KongTel: (852)
2573 2296      Fax: (852) 3015 3860
http://www.hkcmcpa.us
# C_2016038EN.01002101.xml

| 1.2.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 38/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.2.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 38/21

---

Appeal brought by Verband der Kölnisch-Wasser Hersteller, Köln e.V. against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 25 November 2014 in Case T-556/13 Verband der Kölnisch Wasser Hersteller e.V. v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), lodged by fax on 26 January 2015

Verband der Kölnisch Wasser Hersteller e.V.

Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

(Case C-29/15 P)

(2016/C 038/30)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Verband der Kölnisch-Wasser Hersteller, Köln e.V. (represented by: T. Schulte-Beckhausen, Rechtsanwalt)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Other party to the proceedings:

By Order of 3 December 2015, the Court of Justice of the European Union (Eighth Chamber) dismissed the appeal and ordered the appellant to pay its own costs.

---
# C_2016007EN.01000901.xml

| 11.1.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 7/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.1.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 7/9

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht (Germany) lodged on 14 October 2015 — Freie und Hansestadt Hamburg v Jost Pinckernelle

(Case C-535/15)

(2016/C 007/14)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Bundesverwaltungsgericht

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Freie und Hansestadt Hamburg

Applicant:

Defendant: Jost Pinckernelle

Defendant:

Intervening party: The representative of the national interest in the Bundesverwaltungsgericht

Intervening party:

Question referred

Question referred

Is Article 5 of the REACH Regulation (1) to be interpreted as meaning that, subject to Articles 6, 7, 21 and 23 of the REACH Regulation, substances may not be exported out of the European Union unless they have been registered in accordance with the relevant provisions of Title II of the REACH Regulation where this is required?

1

---

(1)  Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), establishing a European Chemicals Agency, amending Directive 1999/45/EC and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 793/93 and Commission Regulation (EC) No 1488/94 as well as Council Directive 76/769/EEC and Commission Directives 91/155/EEC, 93/67/EEC, 93/105/EC and 2000/21/EC (OJ 2006 L 396, p. 1), Commission Regulation (EU) 2015/830 of 28 May 2015 amending Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) (OJ 2015 L 132, p. 8).

1

---
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **CMBS Department**

 

MAC N9401-011

1055 10th Avenue SE

Minneapolis, MN 55414 |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc. 

1585 BROADWAY

NEW YORK, New York 10036-8200

 

RE: Annual Statement ofCompliance for Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc., Commercial Mortgage Pass-ThroughCertificates, Series 2015-UBS8

 

Per the Pooling and ServicingAgreement dated as of December 1, 2015 (the “Agreement”), theundersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Custodian(“Wells Fargo”), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the yearending December 31, 2016 (the “Reporting Period”):

 

(a) A review of WellsFargo’s activities during the Reporting Period and of its performanceunder the Agreement has been made under such officer’s supervision; and

 

(b) To the best of suchofficer’s knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all ofits obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

 

February 27, 2017

 

/s/ Gail Vannest

GAIL VANNEST

Vice President

 

 

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
EXHIBIT
32.1












CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, John
C. Lawrence, President, and Chief Executive Officer of United States Antimony
Corporation (the "Company") do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to my knowledge:





This
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended June
30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "report"),
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and





The
information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.












/s/
      John C. Lawrence
                      Date:
                      August 14, 2009John
      C. LawrencePresident
      and Chief Executive Officer
#### J. Carroll Sheridan et al. *v.*United States

No. 7400.

Invoices dated Stoke on Trent, England, December 1944, etc.

Certified December 1944, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., February 9, 1945, etc.

Entry Nos. 720946; 706758.

(Decided October 7, 1947)

*Jordan & Klingaman*for the plaintiffs.

*Paul P. Bao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Johnson, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5
<LEGEND>
 This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Company's Balance Sheet as of September 30, 2000 and the Statement Of Income
for the year ended September 30, 2000, and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         197,139
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,722,862
<PP&E>                                       7,995,908
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,878,473
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,764,593<F1>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,231,023<F2>
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,533,570<F3>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,764,593<F4>
<SALES>                                      3,399,335<F5>
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,430,943
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               428,566<F6>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             267,564
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,734,813
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,734,813
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,734,813
<EPS-BASIC>                                 3,798.35<F7>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 3,798.35<F7>
<FN>
<F1>Includes unamortized mortgage costs
<F2>Includes accrued interest on mortgage and mortgage principal payment due
    within one year
<F3>Partnership capital
<F4>Includes long-term debt
<F5>Rental income
<F6>Supervisory services, amortization of mortgage refinance costs, and
Professional fees
<F7>Earnings per $5,000 participation unit, based on 720 participation units
    outstanding during the period.
</FN>


</TABLE>
No. 44191.

Suit 4259.

#### *United States*v. *Mexican Petroleum Corp.*

C. D. 133 reversed. C. A. D. 130.
#### David Ashley, Inc., et al. *v.*United States

No. 7422.

Invoices dated London, England, July 1945, etc.

Certified July 1945, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., August 30, 1945, etc.

Entry No. 708530, etc.

(Decided October 27, 1947)

*John D. Bode*for the plaintiffs.

*Paul P: Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Kincheloe, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importers on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF
INCOME FILED AS PART OF THE QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
ON FORM 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>   1,000
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                 SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                                54
<SECURITIES>                                         586
<RECEIVABLES>                                      7,066
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                        1,778
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   9,816
<PP&E>                                            74,369
<DEPRECIATION>                                    26,940
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    63,045
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              8,305
<BONDS>                                            5,868
<COMMON>                                           2,740
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<OTHER-SE>                                        19,568
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      63,045
<SALES>                                           13,276
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  32,871
<CGS>                                              8,753
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     20,165
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 1,764
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    1,498
<INCOME-TAX>                                         629
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  869
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                         869
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        .68
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        .64
        

</TABLE>
### Geology and uranium deposits in the Cave Hills area, Harding County, South Dakota

By: G. N. PipiringosW.A. ChisholmR.C. Kepferle

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp476A

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 4**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
# C_2017121EN.01000701.xml

| 18.4.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 121/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.4.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 121/7

---

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber Chamber) of 2 March 2017 — Panrico, SA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (EUIPO), HDN Development Corp.

(Case C-655/15 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - European Union trade mark - Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Article 52 - Article 8(1)(b) and Article 8(5) - Figurative mark containing the word elements ‘krispy kreme doughnuts’ - National and international word and figurative marks containing the elements ‘donut’, ‘donuts’ and ‘doughnuts’ - Application for a declaration of invalidity - Dismissal))

(2017/C 121/08)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Panrico, SA (represented by: D. Pellisé Urquiza, abogado)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), HDN Development Corp. (represented by: M. H. Granado Carpenter and L. Polo Carreño, abogadas)

Other party to the proceedings:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | orders Panrico SA to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

orders Panrico SA to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 118, 4.4.2016.

1

---
Form 20-F | Integrated Media Technology Limited  Exhibit 13.2   Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of Integrated Media Technology Limited (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2021 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Jing ZHUO, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:  1.
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.  This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, "filed" with the Securities and Exchange Commission.    Date: April 28, 2022   /s/
Jing ZHUO Jing ZHUO Chief
Financial Officer
No. 50662.

#### Protests 108890-K, etc., of Frank Mosco, Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

At the trial it was stipulated that the reliquidation of the entries herein involved is similar in all material respects to that in *Bel Paese Sales Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(15 Cust. Ct. 7, C. D. 932). In accordance with stipulation and following the decision cited, judgment was entered directing the collector to reliquidate the entries herein, refunding the duty established to have been taken in excess, in accordance with the decision and judgment in Abstract 45181.