alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2017006EN.01001801.xml

| 9.1.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 6/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.1.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 6/18

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 26 October 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof — Germany) — Hecht-Pharma GmbH v Hohenzollern Apotheke, owned by Winfried Ertelt

(Case C-276/15) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Medicinal products for human use - Directive 2001/83/EC - Scope - Article 2(1) - Medicinal products prepared industrially or manufactured by a method involving an industrial process - Point 2 of Article 3 - Officinal formula))

(2017/C 006/22)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Bundesgerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Hecht-Pharma GmbH

Applicant:

Defendant: Hohenzollern Apotheke, owned by Winfried Ertelt

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 2(1) of Directive 2001/83/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 November 2001 on the Community code relating to medicinal products for human use, as amended by Directive 2011/62/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2011, must be interpreted as meaning that a medicinal product for human use, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which, under national legislation, does not require a marketing authorisation by reason of the proven frequency with which it is the subject of medical and dental prescriptions, the essential manufacturing steps for such products are carried out in a pharmacy as part of the normal pharmacy business producing in the course of one day up to 100 packages ready for dispensation and intended for supply under the existing pharmacy operating licence, cannot be regarded as having been prepared industrially or manufactured by a method involving an industrial process, within the meaning of that provision, and consequently does not come within the scope of that directive, subject to the findings of fact which it is for the referring court to make.

However, should those findings lead the referring court to take the view that the medicinal product at issue in the main proceedings has been prepared industrially or manufactured by a method involving an industrial process, the answer must also be that point 2 of Article 3 of Directive 2001/83, as amended by Directive 2011/62, must be interpreted as meaning that it does not preclude provisions such as those laid down in Paragraph 21(2), point 1, of the Law on the marketing of medicinal products, read in conjunction with Paragraph 6(1) of the Regulation on the operation of pharmacies, in so far as those provisions, in essence, require pharmacists to comply with the pharmacopoeia when manufacturing officinal formulae. It is, however, for the referring court to determine whether, on the facts of the case before it, the medicinal product at issue in the main proceedings has been prepared in accordance with the prescriptions of a pharmacopoeia.

---

(1)  OJ C 294, 7.9.2015.

1

---
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

(Mark One)

[x]	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006

OR

[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ____________ to ___________

Commission file number 0-2666

250 WEST 57th ST. ASSOCIATES L.L.C.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

A New York Limited Liability Company 	13-6083380

(State or other jurisdiction of	(I.R.S. Employer

incorporation or organization)	Identification No.)

60 East 42nd Street, New York, New York 10165

(Address of principal executive offices)

(Zip Code)

(212) 687-8700

(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

N/A

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [ X ].  No [  ] .

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act) Yes [  ]  No [ X ] .

 

PART I.  FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.  Financial Statements.

250 West 57th St. Associates L.L.C.

(A Limited Liability Company)

Condensed Statements of Income

(Unaudited)

	For the Three Months	For the Six Months

		Ended June 30,	Ended June 30,

	2006	2005	2006	2005

Revenues:
**AO 450 (Rev. 5/85) Judgment in a Civil Case

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

JUDGMENT IN CIVIL CASE 

RON H. GANYON,

Plaintiff,

 Civil Action 2:12-cv-420

v. Judge Algenon L. Marbley

 Magistrate Judge Elizabeth P. Deavers

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, 

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant. 

[] Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues have been

tried and the jury has rendered its verdict.

[] Decision by Court. This action came to trial or hearing before the Court. The issues have

been tried or heard and a decision has been rendered.

[X] Decision by Court. This action was decided by the Court without a trial or hearing.

IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED That pursuant to the

September 12, 2012 Order, the Court GRANTED Plaintiff’s

Motion to Remand and Hold Briefs in Abeyance and Defendant’s

Response. This action is hereby REMANDED to the

Commissioner and the ALJ under Sentence Four of §405(g) for

further proceedings. Judgement is entered in favor of the

Plaintiff. 

Date: September 12, 2012 John Hehman, Clerk

 s/Betty L. Clark 

 Betty L. Clark/Deputy Clerk

Case: 2:12-cv-00420-ALM-EPD Doc #: 14 Filed: 09/12/12 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsFormulation of a General Technique for Predicting Pneumatic Attenuation Errors in Airborne Pressure Sensing DevicesPresented is a mathematical model derived from the Navier-Stokes equations of momentum and continuity, which may be accurately used to predict the behavior of conventionally mounted pneumatic sensing systems subject to arbitrary pressure inputs. Numerical techniques for solving the general model are developed. Both step and frequency response lab tests were performed. These data are compared with solutions of the mathematical model and show excellent agreement. The procedures used to obtain the lab data are described. In-flight step and frequency response data were obtained. Comparisons with numerical solutions of the math model show good agreement. Procedures used to obtain the flight data are described. Difficulties encountered with obtaining the flight data are discussed.Document ID19880010918Acquisition SourceHeadquartersDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsWhitmore, Stephen A.*(NASA Dryden Flight Research Center Edwards, CA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateMay 1, 1988Subject CategoryAircraft Design, Testing And PerformanceReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:100430H-1462NASA-TM-100430Accession Number88N20302Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-68-31Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19880010918.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
114 STAT. 1306 PUBLIC LAW 106–332—OCT. 19, 2000

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 4435:

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 106–648 (Comm. on Resources).

SENATE REPORTS: No. 106–473 (Comm. on Environment and Public Works).

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 146 (2000):

June 6, 7, considered and passed House.

Oct. 5, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 106–332

106th Congress

An Act

To clarify certain boundaries on the map relating to Unit NC–01 of the Coastal

Barrier Resources System.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPLACEMENT OF COASTAL BARRIER RESOURCES

SYSTEM MAP.

(a) IN GENERAL.—The map described in subsection (b) is

replaced, in the maps depicting the Coastal Barrier Resources

System that are referred to in section 4(a) of the Coastal Barrier

Resources Act (16 U.S.C. 3503(a)), by the map entitled ‘‘Pine Island

Unit NC–01’’ and dated May 1, 2000.

(b) DESCRIPTION OF REPLACED MAP.—The map described in

this subsection is the map that—

(1) relates to Pine Island Unit NC–01 located in Currituck

and Dare Counties, North Carolina; and

(2) is included in a set of maps entitled ‘‘Coastal Barrier

Resources System’’, dated October 24, 1990, revised on October

23, 1992, and referred to in section 4(a) of the Coastal Barrier

Resources Act (16 U.S.C. 3503(a)).

SEC. 2. AVAILABILITY.

The Secretary of the Interior shall keep the replacement map

referred to in section 1 on file and available for inspection in

accordance with section 4(b) of the Coastal Barrier Resources Act

(16 U.S.C. 3503(b)).

Approved October 19, 2000.

16 USC 3503

note.

Oct. 19, 2000

[H.R. 4435]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
BALANCE SHEET AND INCOME STATEMENT OF TYCO INTERNATIONAL LTD. AS OF AND FOR
THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          70,301
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  895,607
<ALLOWANCES>                                    52,013
<INVENTORY>                                    706,452
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,018,055
<PP&E>                                       1,574,428
<DEPRECIATION>                                 675,156
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,017,042
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,800,401
<BONDS>                                        839,992
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        78,297
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,055,502
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,017,042
<SALES>                                      1,479,152
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,479,152
<CGS>                                        1,072,852
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,072,852
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 3,020
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              26,332
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                138,880
<INCOME-TAX>                                    55,830
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             83,050
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    83,050
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.54
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.54
        

</TABLE>
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

LOUIS N. MCCUTCHEN

, Appellant,

v.

NEW PENN FINANCIAL, LLC, d/b/a SHELLPOINT

MORTGAGE SERVICING i n substitution for the original

Plaintiff BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 16

- 2536

[ August 3, 2017 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit,

Broward County ; Joel T. Lazarus , Judge; L.T. Case No. 15

- 008706 CACE

11

.

Catherine A. Riggins, Miami, for appellant.

Erin M. Berger of Kelley Kronenberg, Tampa, for ap pellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

L EVINE

, C ONNER

, JJ., and S MALL

, L ISA , Associate Judge, concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
# C_2016078EN.01000302.xml

| 29.2.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 78/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.2.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 78/3

---

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 10 December 2015 — Naftiran Intertrade Co. (NICO) Sàrl v Council of the European Union

(Case C-153/15 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Restrictive measures taken against Iran - List of persons and entities subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources - Inclusion of the appellant’s name - Admissibility - Period allowed for commencing proceedings - Point from which time starts to run - Manifest inadmissibility))

(2016/C 078/04)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Naftiran Intertrade Co. (NICO) Sàrl (represented by: J. Grayston, Solicitor, P. Gjørtler, advokat, G. Pandey and D. Rovetta, avocats, and M. Gambardella, avvocato)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bishop and I. Rodios, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

| 2. | Naftiran Intertrade Co. (NICO) Sàrl shall bear its own costs and shall pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Naftiran Intertrade Co. (NICO) Sàrl shall bear its own costs and shall pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union.

---

(1)  OJ C 190, 8.6.2015.

1

---
# C_2016038EN.01004601.xml

| 1.2.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 38/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.2.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 38/46

---

Order of the President of the Court of 21 October 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf — Germany) — Colena AG v Deiters GmbH

(Case C-78/15) (1)

1

(2016/C 038/58)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 171, 26.5.2015.

1

---
U.S. Geological SurveyGeologic Investigations Series Map I-2731-A  Version 1.0  2003

**Sea Floor Topography of Quadrangle 1 in Western Massachusetts Bay Offshore of Boston, Massachusetts**

**By Bradford Butman, Laura Hayes, William W. Danforth, and Page C. Valentine**

| **Introduction**

This 27 x 33 inch map shows sea floor depth as topographic contours at a scale of 1:25,000. It is based on multibeam echo-sounder data collected during four cruises conductedbetween the fall of 1994 and the fall of 1998. The map is part of a 3-quadranglemap series showing the area offshore of Boston, Mass., that is companion to theStellwagen Bank National Marine Sanctuary map series (Valentine and others, 2001,2003a-c; also see location map). Other maps of Quadrangle 1 depict shaded reliefand topographic contours (Butman and others, 2003a), and backscatter intensity,shaded relief, and topographic contours (Butman and others, 2003b). |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                 |
|---------------------------------|
| Thumbnail image of map I-2731-A |

 

Geologic Investigations Series Map I-2731-A [180-KB PDF file]

     Download free Adobe Reader software.     Visit the Adobe accessibility website.

**Contact Information**

For questions about the   scientific content of this report, contact Bradford Butman.
Document

Exhibit 10.34
9/9/2021
Joshua Ensign

Dear Joshua,
We are pleased to offer you the position President of Proterra Transit, reporting to Jack Allen. We are offering you an annual salary of $400,000. The effective date is September 1st, 2021.
Effective for Fiscal Year 2021, you will continue to be eligible to participate in Proterra’s Annual Bonus Program. Your bonus percentage will adjust as of September 1, 2021 and you will be eligible for the new bonus target for the remainder of 2021.
						
	Current Annual Bonus Target	New Annual Bonus Target
	50%	75%




You will continue to be eligible to participate in the Proterra Long Term Incentive Program as outlined in your letter from Jack Allen on June 25, 2021. The Long-Term Incentive is outlined below:


									
	Total Long-Term Incentive Value (Split between RSU
and Options)
	RSU Value	Stock Options Value
	$750K	$375K	$375K




This award will vest in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Company’s equity incentive plan. 
All elected benefits will be adjusted to reflect this increase.
We look forward to your continued contributions working with the Proterra team and providing you with professional opportunities.
Please sign below confirming your acceptance of the promotion and all information contained herein; then return to Human Resources by 9/10/2021. If you have any questions, please call Human Resources.
Again, congratulations and we wish you much success.
Sincerely, 

Cissy Nix
Director, Human Resources
By signing and dating this letter below, I, Joshua Ensign, accept this offer.


Signature: /s/ Joshua Ensign        Date:  9/20/2021
No. 53742.

protest 145273-K (New York).

#### Joseph Markovits, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial it was stipulated that the issues and facts herein are similar to those involved in *United States*v. *Browne Vintners Co., Inc.*(34 C. C. P. A. 112, C. A. D. 351) and that the quantities reported' by the *213inspector as not landed were not in fact landed. In accordance with stipulation and following the decision cited it was held that the merchandise, insofar as it involves the quantities reported by the inspector as manifested, not found, is subject to an allowance in duties. The protest was sustained to this extent.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-6038

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

GARY RAY DEBOLT,

 Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern 

District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, 

Jr., Senior District Judge. (5:09-cr-00024-FPS-JES-1; 

5:12-cv-00109-FPS-JES)

Submitted: May 29, 2014 Decided: June 2, 2014

Before SHEDD, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gary Ray DeBolt, Appellant Pro Se. David J. Perri, Michael D. 

Stein, Assistant United States Attorneys, Wheeling, West 

Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Gary Ray DeBolt seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and 

denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order 

is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a 

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). 

A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a 

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies 

relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by 

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the 

district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is 

debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 

(2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). 

When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the 

prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural 

ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable 

claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. 

at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that DeBolt has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we 

deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED