alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2015311EN.01004201.xml

| 21.9.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 311/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.9.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 311/42

---

Action brought on 17 July 2015 — European Commission v Council of the European Union

(Case C-389/15)

(2015/C 311/45)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: F. Castillo de la Torre, J. Guillem Carrau, B. Hartmann, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Defendant:

The applicant claims that the Court should:

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the decision of the Council of 7 May 2015 authorising the opening of negotiations on a revised Lisbon Agreement on Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications as regards matters falling within the competence of the European Union; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the Council of 7 May 2015 authorising the opening of negotiations on a revised Lisbon Agreement on Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications as regards matters falling within the competence of the European Union;

| — | maintain the effects of the contested decision, where appropriate, until the entry into force, within a reasonable period from the delivery of the present judgment, of a new decision that is to be adopted by the Council of the European Union pursuant to Article 218(3), (4) and (8) TFEU; |
| --- | --- |

—

maintain the effects of the contested decision, where appropriate, until the entry into force, within a reasonable period from the delivery of the present judgment, of a new decision that is to be adopted by the Council of the European Union pursuant to Article 218(3), (4) and (8) TFEU;

| — | order the Council of the European Union to bear the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Council of the European Union to bear the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

First plea: The contested Decision acknowledges the existence of competence of the Member States, in breach of Article 3 TFEU, since the negotiation concerns an agreement which falls within the exclusive competence of the Union

First plea:

Second plea: Infringement of Articles 207(3) and 218(3), (4) and (8) TFEU because the Council has appointed Member States as ‘negotiators’, in a matter of EU competence, and has not adopted the contested Decision in accordance with the applicable majority

Second plea

---
```

[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 80 (Thursday, April 26, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 20814-20815]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-8008]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

    The Department of Commerce will submit to the Office for Management 
and Budget (OMB) for clearance the following proposal for collection of 
information under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 
1995, Public Law 104-13.
    Bureau: International Trade Administration (ITA).
    Title: Application for Designation of a Fair.
    OMB Number: 0625-0228.
    Agency Form Number: ITA-4135P.
    Type of Request: Regular submission.
    Burden Hours: 100.

[[Page 20815]]

    Number of Respondents: 200.
    Average Time per Response: 30 minutes.
    Needs and Uses: The International Trade Administration's Tourism 
Industries Office offers trade fair guidance and assistance to trade 
fair organizers, trade fair operators, and other travel and trade 
oriented groups. These fairs open doors to promising travel markets 
around the world. The ``Application for Designation of a Fair'' is a 
questionnaire that is prepared and signed by an organizer to begin the 
certification process. It asks the fair organizer to provide details 
such as the date, place, and sponsor of the fair, as well as license, 
permit, and corporate backers, and countries participating.
    To apply for the U.S. Department of Commerce sponsorship, the fair 
organizer must have all of the components of the application in order. 
Then, with the approval, the organizer is able to bring in their 
products in accordance with Customs laws. Articles which may be brought 
in include, but are not limited to, actual exhibit booths, exhibit 
items, pamphlets, brochures, and explanatory material in reasonable 
quantities relating to the foreign exhibits at a fair, and material for 
use in constructing, installing, or maintaining foreign exhibits at a 
fair.
    Affected Public: Business or other for-profit organizations.
    Frequency: On occasion.
    Respondent's Obligation: Voluntary.
    OMB Desk Officer: David Rostker, (202) 395-389-3897.
    Copies of the above information collection proposal can be obtained 
by writing Diana Hynek, Departmental Paperwork Clearance Officer, 
Department of Commerce, Room 6625, 14th & Constitution Avenue, NW., 
Washington, DC 20230; E-mail: [email protected].
    Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information 
collection should be sent within 30 days of the publication of this 
notice in the Federal Register to David Rostker, OMB Desk Officer, 
[email protected] or Fax (202) 395-7285.

    Dated: April 23, 2007.
Gwellnar Banks,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief Information Officer.
 [FR Doc. E7-8008 Filed 4-25-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DR-P
```
# C_2015138EN.01003101.xml

| 27.4.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 138/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.4.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 138/31

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Commissione Tributaria Provinciale di Cagliari (Italy) lodged on 29 January 2015 — Gicacomo Bolasco di Gianni Bolasco S.a.s. v Comune di Monastir, Equitalia Centro SpA

(Case C-37/15)

(2015/C 138/42)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Referring court

Commissione Tributaria Provinciale di Cagliari

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Gicacomo Bolasco di Gianni Bolasco S.a.s.

Applicant:

Defendants: Comune di Monastir, Equitalia Centro SpA

Defendants:

Question referred

Question referred

Does Community law preclude the rules laid down in Article 188 of Legislative Decree No 152/2006 and the Decree of the Minister for the Environment of 17 December 2009, under which the entry into force of the legislation transposing Directive 2008/98/EC (1) into national law is to be deferred pending the adoption of a ministerial decree laying down the related technical rules and specifying the time-limits within which that implementing legislation is to enter into force?

1

---

(1)  Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 2008 on waste and repealing certain Directives (OJ 2003 L 312, p. 3).

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                             261
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,737
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        978
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 4,583
<PP&E>                                           7,925
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,150
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  18,257
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,828
<BONDS>                                          5,338
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            77
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,151
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    18,257
<SALES>                                          4,565
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,565
<CGS>                                            3,806
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,806
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 136
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    341
<INCOME-TAX>                                       132
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                209
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       209
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.71
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.68


</TABLE>
(Reap. Dec. 9788)

#### Sears, Roebuck and Co. *v.*United States

Entry No. 3295, etc.

(Decided September 29, 1960)

*Lane, Young & Fox*for the plaintiff.

*George Gochran Doul),*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

WilsoN, Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the respective parties:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the parties hereto, subject to the approval of the Court, that the merchandise covered by the above appeals for reappraisement consists of bamboo blinds, bamboo porch shades, and sets of hardware accessories imported from Japan; and that each bamboo blind and bamboo porch shade, as invoiced, is accompanied by one set of hardware accessories.

> That on or about the dates of exportation of the merchandise hereinbefore described, such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of Japan, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade for exportation to the United States, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges, and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition packed ready for shipment to the United States, at the appraised unit values, packed; *493and that said unit values include the cost of the sets of hardware accessories, which cost is 3 cents (U.S. Cy) per set of hardware accessories; and that there was no higher foreign value.

> That the above appeals for reappraisement are limited to the merchandise hereinbefore described and are abandoned as to all other merchandise; and that said appeals may be deemed to be submitted for decision upon this stipulation.

On the agreed facts, I find and hold that export value, as that value is defined in section 402(d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, is the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values were the appraised unit values, packed, said unit values including the cost of the sets of hardware accessories, which cost is 3 cents (U.S. currency) per set of hardware accessories.

The appeals having been abandoned insofar as they relate to other merchandise, to that extent, the appeals are dismissed.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
# C_2016200EN.01000501.xml

| 6.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 200/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 200/5

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Bacău (Romania) lodged on 27 July 2015 — Ovidiu Rîpanu v Compania Națională ‘Loteria Română’ S.A.

(Case C-407/15)

(2016/C 200/07)

Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Referring court

Curtea de Apel Bacău (România)

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Ovidiu Rîpanu

Applicant:

Defendant: Compania Națională ‘Loteria Română’ S.A.

Defendant:

By order of 18 February 2016, the Court (Tenth Chamber) declared that it clearly lacked jurisdiction to reply to the question submitted.

---
Before the First Division,

August 24, 1939

No. 41982.

#### Protests 894348-G, etc., of May Dept. Stores, Inc., et al. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

McClelland, P. J.

While the combination of articles, namely, racquets, shuttlecocks, and net, is described in the stipulation as “complete articles (badminton sets),” the court was not satisfied that sufficient evidence had been presented to warrant a finding that the combination constitutes an entirety for tariff purposes. *Lang*v. *United States*(15 Ct. Cust. Appls. 341, T. D. 42495) cited. The protests were therefore overruled. Judge Sullivan agreed in the conclusion; Brown, J., dissented.
EXHIBIT 32.1
------------

                              UNITED-GUARDIAN, INC.
                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of  United-Guardian,  Inc. (the
"Registrant") on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2004, as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  I, Alfred R.  Globus,  Chief  Executive  Officer of the  Registrant,
hereby  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  section  1350,  as adopted  pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) the Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


Date:  November 5, 2004                  /s/ Alfred R. Globus
                                         --------------------------
                                         Alfred R. Globus
                                         Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit
        15
 
 
 August
        7,
        2006
 
 Securities
        and
        Exchange Commission
 100
        F Street,
        N.E.
 Washington,
        DC
        20549
 
 Commissioners:
 
 We
        are aware that our report dated August 2, 2006 on our review of interim
        financial information of UniSource Energy Corporation (the "Company") for
        the three
        and six- month **** periods **** ended
        June 30, 2006
        and 2005 and
        included in the
        Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006
        is
        incorporated by reference in the Company’s Registration Statements on Form S-8
        (Nos.333-43765, 333-43767, 333-43769, 333-53309, 333-53333, 333-53337 and
        333-99317), and on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-31043, 333-93769, 333-103392 and
        333-126141).
 
 Very
        truly
        yours,
  /s/
        PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
  PricewaterhouseCoopers
        LLP
 Chicago,
        Illinois
EXHIBIT 11 -  Computation of Earnings Per Share -


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

Item 6(a)
Exhibit 11
Computation of Earnings per Share
United Industrial Corporation and Subsidiaries




                                                              Three Months Ended                      Nine Months Ended
                                                                  September 30                           September 30
                                                                ---------------                          ------------

                                                           1996                 1995                1996              1995
                                                           ----                 ----                ----              ----
<S>                                                   <C>                  <C>                <C>                <C>   
Primary:

   Average shares outstanding                         12,212,123           12,220,861          12,197,703        12,203,676
                                                      ==========           ==========          ==========        ==========

   Net income                                           $163,000             $423,000          $3,052,000        $2,887,000
                                                        ========             ========          ==========        ==========

   Earnings per share                                     $  .01               $  .04              $  .25              $.24
                                                          ======               ======              ======              ====

</TABLE>
Before the Third Division,

October 31, 1945

No. 50641.

#### Protests 49599-K, etc., of Hummel Chemical Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

At the trial it was established that it was necessary to destroy the drums in order to remove the contents, and that_after the removal of the wool grease from the containers, the mutilated drums are carted away to the dump at the expense of the importer. The collector’s amended reports were offered in evidence wherein it is stated that the drums were of the character to which free entry may be granted. In view of the evidence the protests were sustained as claimed.
Skip Links

USGS HomeContact USGSSearch USGS

U.S. Geological Survey Geologic Investigations Series I–2747

Pubs Warehouse

### Prepared for the National Aeronautics and Space Administration

# Geologic Map of the Kaiwan Fluctus Quadrangle (V–44), Venus

#### By Nathan T. Bridges and George E. McGill

#### 2002

### Introduction

Kaiwan Fluctus quadrangle (V–44), Venus, lies between 25° to 50° S. latitude and 0° to 30° E. longitude. Alpha Regio dominates the northwestern part of the quadrangle. This Greenland-sized block of tessera has pronounced topography, rising up to 3 km above the surrounding plains. The south-central to southeastern part of the quadrangle contains Astkhik Planum, which stands a few hundred meters above the adjacent plains (see discussion of Derceto Plateau in Baer and others, 1994). The southwest margin of Astkhik is bounded by tessera material, whereas the northern and eastern edges are sur- rounded by a belt of ridges and troughs that slope away from the plateau into a topographic moat. Seven coro-nae are in V–44; five of these—Eve, Carpo, Tamfana, Selu, and Derceto—are part of a larger extensional belt that continues southward into V–56 quadrangle (Baer and others, 1994). A classic assemblage of steep-sided domes, Seoritsu Farra, is 200 km east of Alpha Regio. The map area contains 15 impact craters, including Stuart, which is recognized for its extensive impact melt outflows and parabolic halo. 

Last modified March 21, 2012 First posted January 26, 2004

-  **Sheet 1** PDF (~41" x ~39"; 21.6 MB) 
-  **Sheet 2** PDF (~54" x ~38"; 0.6 MB) 

- This report is also available in print from:    USGS Information Services, Box 25286,   Federal Center, Denver, CO 80225  telephone: 888 ASK-USGS; e-mail:  infoservices@usgs.gov 

**For additional information:**Contact Astrogeology Research Program staffAstrogeology Science CenterU.S. Geological Survey2255 N. Gemini Dr.Flagstaff, AZ 86001http://astrogeology.usgs.gov/

This report is presented in Portable Document Format (PDF); the latest version of Adobe Reader or similar software is required to view it. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge.

----

### Suggested citation:

Bridges N.T., and McGill, G.E., 2002, Geologic Map of the Kaiwan Fluctus Quadrangle (V–44), Venus:  U.S. Geological Survey Geologic Investigations Series I–2747, available at https://pubs.usgs.gov/imap/i2747/.

----

AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior |            U.S. Geological Survey           	URL: *http://pubsdata.usgs.gov/pubs/imap/i2747/index.html*            Page Contact Information: GS Pubs Web Contact           	Page Last Modified: Wednesday, 30-Nov-2016 17:39:19 EST
February 1 , 20 10

MEMORANDUM TO: Air Docket EP A - HQ - OAR- 2005 - 0161 SUBJECT: Fuel - Specific Lifecycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions Results This memorandum accompanies spreadsheets containing fuel
- specific lifecycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions results plac ed on the docket for this rulemaking under the same docket number
. The spreadsheets that accompany this memorandum contain results for the renewable fuels considered under this rulemaking. Our anal ysis of fuel
- specific lifecycle GHG emissions utilized se veral data sources and models, as explained in the preamble and Chapter 2 of the Regulatory Impac t Assessment (RIA)
. The spreadsheets that accompan y this memorandum integrate results from all stages of the fuel lifecy cle to calculate fuel
specific lifecy c le GHG reductions. The fuel
- specific GHG reductions are calculated as percent emissions reduction s compared to a 2005 petroleum baseline. The docketed s preadsheets use three separate categories of tabs to calculate the lifecy cle GHG results.  The Plant Ty pes tab lists the ty pes of fuel production facilities anal yz ed for each of the major renewable fuel ty pes. For example, 34 production facilit y typ es were anal yz ed for corn ethanol. This tab shows the energy sources, plant features, an d fuel production GH G emissions for each plant t yp e anal yz ed. For more information about fuel production GHG emissions estimates refer to RIA Chapter 2.  The Results_2022 tab includes the annual emissions , starting in 2022, produced during each stage of the fuel lifecy cle , in cluding annual GHG emissions from ten components of the fuel lifecy cle. The reader can change the time horizon and discount rate applied to emissions to see how these factors effects the final results. Results tabs are also included for the high and low land use change estimates based on the uncertaint y anal ys is conducted for this rulemaking.  The LUC_2022 tab contains a calculation of indirect international land use change emissions produced by renewable fuel production. The crop expansion reported in this tab comes from the FAPRI model. 1 The land use change emissions factors were calculated using data provided by Winrock International In c. 2

1 The FAPRI model projections are described in detail in RIA Chapter 2, and detailed result are provided in spreadsheets that were docketed separately. 2 The Winrock calculations are discussed in detail in RIA Chapter 2, and sp readsheets with the calculations were docketed separately.Most spreadsheets also include results calculations for the year s 2012 and 2017 as well
.

Many of the results spreadsheets include high and low estimates which form a 95% confidence interval around EPA’s central estimates. The confidence intervals are based on EPA’s quantification of the uncertainty in projected international land use change emissions impacts. F or the corn ethanol and biodiesel there are separate spreadsheets that include results for a high yield sensitivity case. Each spreadsheet also contains a number of summary

information and charts that are discussed in the RIA Chapter 2. For more informat ion see the RIA Chapter 2.