alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION    Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I,
James H. Perry, as Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Controller of United Industrial Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



|Date: November 9, 2007 |  | By: | /s/JAMES H. PERRYJames H. Perry Vice President, Chief
Financial Officer
and Controller
|---------------------- |  | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to United Industrial Corporation and will be retained by
United Industrial Corporation and furnished to the Securities Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The
foregoing certification is being furnished pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, and it is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the company, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

---



QuickLinks
## EPA Reg. No. 83997-2 vol. 3

(formerly 10465-33)
1001 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20004-2595  p202 624-2500  f202 628-5116

Crowell & Moring LLP  www.crowell.com  Washington, DC  New York  San Francisco  Los Angeles  Orange County  Anchorage  London  Brussels

Steven J. Seiden

(202) 624-2609

sseiden@crowell.com

March 26, 2015

VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL

Mr. Paul Gretch

Director

Office of International Aviation

U.S. Department of Transportation

Room W86-316

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE

Washington, DC 20590

Re: Polling Results for Motion of United Airlines, Inc. for a 60-Day Start-Up Extension

(San Francisco-Shanghai, China), Docket DOT-OST-2014-0196

Dear Mr. Gretch:

United1has polled and received non-objections from each of the carriers served with the 

above-referenced Motion. Prompt approval is requested so that United can continue to 

coordinate with local Chinese government officials and airport authorities to secure slot times at 

Shanghai Pudong International Airport that are compatible with United’s expanded San 

Francisco-Shanghai service, which it intends to commence as soon as practicable but in no event 

later than July 15, 2015. 

Respectfully submitted,

Steven J. Seiden

Counsel for

United Airlines, Inc.

cc: Robert Finamore

Brian Hedberg

Brett Kruger

All Parties on the attached Service List

 

1

 Common names are used for airlines. 
Crowell & Moring LLP  www.crowell.com  Washington, DC  New York  San Francisco  Los Angeles  Orange County  Anchorage  London  Brussels

SERVICE LIST

robert.wirick@aa.com

howard.kass@aa.com

rpommer@atlasair.com

nssparks@fedex.com

gbleopard@fedex.com

sllunsford@fedex.com

jhill@cooley.com

perkmann@cooley.com

anita.mosner@hklaw.com

jennifer.nowak@hklaw.com

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com

sametta.c.barnett@delta.com

chris.walker@delta.com

dwight.moore@ustranscom.mil

john.s.duncan@faa.gov

englets@state.gov
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

-vsMichael P. Cefus 

________________________________

Case No. 2:13-CR-293

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

The Defendant, by consent, has appeared before me pursuant to

Rule 11, F.R.Cr.P. and has entered a plea of guilty to Count one (1)

of the Information. After examining the Defendant under oath

concerning each of the subjects mentioned in Rule 11, I determine that

the defendant is competent and capable of entering an informed plea,

that the guilty plea is knowingly and voluntary made and that the

offenses charged are supported by an independent basis in fact

containing each of the essential elements of such offense. 

 The plea agreement contains an agreed sentence and it is up

to the District Judge to determine if the sentence is appropriate. If

the District Judge does so determine, I RECOMMEND the plea agreement

and the plea of guilty should be accepted and the Defendant should be

adjudged guilty and sentenced accordingly. Otherwise, the plea

agreement should be rejected and the defendant should be allowed to

withdraw the guilty plea. 

 

Date: January 17, 2014 /s/ Terence P. Kemp 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE

Failure to file written objections to this Report and

Recommendation within fourteen (14) days from the date of its service

shall bar an aggrieved party from attacking such Report and

Recommendation before the assigned United States District Judge. 28

U.S.C. Section 636(b)(1)(B).

Case: 2:13-cr-00293-GCS Doc #: 25 Filed: 01/17/14 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Aris Industries, Inc. Certification under Section 906 of the Sarbanes/Oxley Act
- Filed as an Exhibit to 10-Q for the Quarter Ended March 31, 2003

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Aris Industries, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof ("Report"), I, Paul
Spector, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(3)       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(4)       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.




/s/ Arnold H. Simon
-------------------------------------
Arnold H. Simon
Chief Executive Officer
May 13, 2003


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Aris Industries, Inc. and will be retained by Aris Industries, Inc.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
<TABLE>
                                                                      Exhibit 12

                                                            TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY
                                                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                                                                    -In Thousands-


                                            3 Months
                                             Ended     ----------------------12 Months Ended---------------------------
                                            Mar. 31,   Mar. 31,   Dec. 31,   Dec. 31,   Dec. 31,   Dec. 31,   Dec. 31,
                                              2001       2001       2000       1999       1998       1997       1996
                                             -------    -------    -------    -------    -------    -------    --------
<S>                                          <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>

FIXED CHARGES:
  Interest on Long-Term Debt (1)             $15,772    $65,274    $66,377    $66,836    $72,672    $66,247    $59,836
  Other Interest (2)                          $1,959     $8,329     $9,067    $13,081    $13,207     $9,640    $11,721
  Interest on Capital Lease Obligations (3)  $42,450    $89,094    $90,365    $82,414    $81,823    $83,019    $84,383
                                            --------   --------   --------   --------   --------   --------   --------
TOTAL FIXED CHARGES                          $60,181   $162,697   $165,809   $162,331   $167,702   $158,906   $155,940



NET INCOME                                   $23,511    $74,766    $51,169    $73,475    $41,676    $83,572   $120,852

LESS:
  Extraordinary Income - Net of Tax               $0         $0         $0    $22,597         $0         $0         $0
                                            --------   --------   --------   --------   --------   --------    -------
NET INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS        $23,511    $74,766    $51,169    $50,878    $41,676    $83,572   $120,852

ADD (DEDUCT):
  Income Taxes - Operating Expense           $15,195    $35,292    $19,036    $18,268    $18,372    $19,297     $9,795
  Income Taxes - Other                        $2,102     $7,675     $7,530     $4,082      ($794)  ($41,401)  ($91,950)
  Total Fixed Charges                        $60,181   $162,697   $165,809   $162,331   $167,702   $158,906   $155,940
                                            --------   --------   --------   --------   --------   --------   --------
TOTAL EARNINGS BEFORE TAXES
AND FIXED CHARGES                           $100,989   $280,430   $243,544   $235,559   $226,956   $220,374   $194,637



RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES             1.678      1.724     1.469       1.451      1.353      1.387      1.248



(1) Amounts have been restated for years ended 1996 and 1997 to conform to current year's presentation.

(2) Excludes recognition of Allowance for Borrowed Funds Used During Construction.

(3) Capital Lease Interest Paid from Statement of Cash Flows.


</TABLE>
----

----

----

| 2. | Subordination. |
|----|----------------|

----

| 2.3 | Subordinated Debt Payment Restrictions. |
|-----|-----------------------------------------|

----

----

| 2.9 | Sale, Transfer or other Disposition of Subordinated Debt. |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------|

----

----

----

----

----

----

|   | SUBORDINATED CREDITOR: |
|--------|------------------------|

|   | UNITED MORTGAGE TRUST, a Maryland Trust |
|--------|-----------------------------------------|

|   | UNITED DEVELOPMENT FUNDING, L.P., a        Delaware limited partnership |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | By: | United Development Funding, Inc., its general partner |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------|

----
No. 55448.

#### Leo Wolleman and J. & H. Baer, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 168779-K and 168784-K (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of synthetic stones the same in all material respects as those the subject of *S. Nathan & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(37 C. C. P. A. 99, C. A. D. 426), the claim at 10 percent under paragraph 1528 was sustained.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsNondestructive evaluation of structural ceramicsA review is presented on research and development of techniques for nondestructive evaluation and characterization of advanced ceramics for heat engine applications. Highlighted in this review are Lewis Research Center efforts in microfocus radiography, scanning laser acoustic microscopy (SLAM), scanning acoustic microscopy (SAM), scanning electron acoustic microscopy (SEAM), and photoacoustic microscopy (PAM). The techniques were evaluated by applying them to research samples of green and sintered silicon nitride and silicon carbide in the form of modulus-of-rupture bars containing seeded voids. Probabilities of detection of voids were determined for diameters as small as 20 microns for microfucus radiography, SLAM, and SAM. Strengths and limitations of the techniques for ceramic applications are identified. Application of ultrasonics for characterizing ceramic microstructures is also discussed.Document ID19870008676Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference PaperAuthorsKlima, Stanley J.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Baaklini, George Y.*(Cleveland State Univ. Ohio, United States)*Abel, Phillip B.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1987Subject CategoryQuality Assurance And ReliabilityReport/Patent NumberE-3446NASA-TM-88978NAS 1.15:88978Accession Number87N18109Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 533-05-01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19870008676.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Case: 2:12-cv-01192-EAS-EPD Doc #: 59 Filed: 11/15/13 Page: 1 of 1  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-08T16:48:46-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
```

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 78 (Friday, April 23, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 21285]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-9384]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ELECTION ASSISTANCE COMMISSION

Request for Substantive Comments on the EAC's Proposed 
Requirements for the Testing of Pilot Voting Systems To Serve UOCAVA 
Voters; Correction

AGENCY: United States Election Assistance Commission.

ACTION: Notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a correcting to provide for a thirty day public 
comment period as reflected by commission tally vote. The original 
notice incorrectly provided for a fifteen day public comment period. 
The U.S. Election Assistance Commission (EAC) is publishing for public 
comment a set of proposed requirements for the testing of pilot voting 
systems to be used by jurisdictions to serve Uniformed and Overseas 
voters.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Matthew Masterson, Phone (202) 566-
3100, e-mail votingsystemguidelines@eac.gov.

Correction

    In the Federal Register of March 31, 2010, on page 16090, in the 
first column, correct the DATE caption to read:

DATES: Comments must be received on or before 4 p.m. EST on April 30, 
2010.

Alice Miller,
Chief Operating Officer, U.S. Election Assistance Commission.
[FR Doc. 2010-9384 Filed 4-22-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-KF-P
```
David Greear

dba Silver Image Studio

P.O. Box 252

Helen, GA 30545

Petition for Exemption under Sec 333

To whom it may concern,

I have been a professional photographer for over 30 years. I am requesting an exemption to rule

Sec. 333, 14 CFR § 11.81.

Providing aerial photography has been a part of my business since it’s beginning. The terrain in

our region is very mountainous and utilizing piloted aircraft is very hazardous. Due to the 

mountainous terrain, photographing real estate from the ground is difficult and often

inadequate. Having the ability to use a camera equipped, unmanned, remotely controlled

quadcopter is a much safer alternative to piloted aircraft for the public at large.

I, David Greear am seeking an exemption of the FAA’s Sec 333 rules that does not allow the 

use of an unmanned aircraft to be used for commercial purposes. I am petitioning for an 

exemption to provide a commercial service to private land owners and companies who wish to 

obtain and capture aerial photos and videos of said property for purposes including real estate 

listings, insurance property claims, and for use as a marketing tool for businesses. When flying 

for this commercial purpose I would be flying at a maximum altitude of less than 400 feet and 

flying mostly vertically for the purposes of taking photos. My general knowledge of the aviation 

safety systems implemented by the FAA would be used to ensure that safety would not be 

affected by my operations. I would not be flying near disaster areas, sporting events, or high 

traffic areas including airports.

I intend to only fly in low populated, residential or rural areas and stay clear of all utility lines etc. 

I intend to be fully aware of my surroundings at all times and to only fly the unmanned aircraft 

within a visual line of sight and only in Visual Flight Conditions.

I will be flying a well maintained DJI Phantom 3 Professional quadcopter. I will never operate the 

aircraft in adverse weather conditions or when the aircraft is not performing optimally.

I have lived in the same location for over 30 years and I am very involved with my community. I

have served on government commissions and boards. I am a responsible adult. I have built a

reputation for being a conscientious professional. Granting the exemption will not adversely 

affect the safety of the general public 

I will not be using any unmanned aircraft outside the United States. 

I appreciate the FAA’s consideration of this petition for exemption.

Respectfully submitted,

David Greear
# C_2016136EN.01002302.xml

| 18.4.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 136/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.4.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 136/23

---

Order of the President of the Court of 15 January 2016 — European Commission v Romania

(Case C-306/15) (1)

1

(2016/C 136/30)

Language of the case: Romanian

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 311, 21.9.2015.

1

---
### p. 1 

# OAR Box 1865 Prepped byCharmelle Mathews



# Document

Number: 

# 161 ) VI-E-1 0 Docket Number: 

# A-83-2 7

Printed 12/3/20083:22:22 PM

Sheet 161 of 198P. 2

TELEPHONE/CAL L RECORO SlncMln gCall Qoucgoln * Cel l Perso nCallin g Perso nCalled .r-^a ^ VV^Vjl-^JkjvX v Projec tNo . 

# *%Th\ - col , 

# A-83-2 7 ProjectNea

e >*« - ^^ ^ 

# KZ\Z-^\ ^ Tla a VI-E-1 0 

# ^_/ . 0c * Activit y Activit y 

# 'C~Z*=>2- " ^^-W^ \- V\^S r CeneielSubject 

# V^ < : S «=•><-> 

# ^ V TOPIC S DISCUSSE D AN D ACTIO N TAKE N -•^»s-/ 0 •> ' - . jVvn i 

# V-^ VU 

# V\sS<^

_ ^ ^ ^r^-Js^ , ^'•VC ^ >V % '

^Cv»<S - ^ ^ • ^ ^ J2& J 

# Vc> o ^ > «--_•«£ . CN4 — 

# o- w ^^s s V^* ^V^^>^ X

w\cv>^ S NQ^V»>»\ a^ V ^ J ) ^N * <\-e* . ^ C A ^X-W-^Or- ^ 

# c c_ ^ 

# " s <* . W ^ ^-^^- V L

^ 

# ^5

" W^x-^-re^ .<•>«

_v . V-r O Os-S* . _1 £ 

# ^ K c v 

# is - O* . 0-S » 

# c^ W=\ - No , -^—V=c v 

# Vv^ . =

X SV^CW^S L -can . 

# N^ V^>Np\ < ^ ^ « ~""^ ^ 

# ^\^ ^ N^ . CXv^5V- . CS-v-vga A V>^tv- ^ N *^4B-Q*^S.' « C^o'sSv S 

# ^ 5 >N.«S-fr<. - ^XdVA^ , 

# ^VN « C J ^ ^ 

# ^r^xNgc ^sN r -!s-6-c*-r : N-\^S i 

# \z . •^v ^ 

# v , 

# v*>: N<~ ^ 

# ^<s. ' ^ ^ ^CLO j .*V .



# is * <3v>—<s ^ VJ^-^C- 1 rVjS.<T ^ 

# 7 ^ x-v* » •X^Or^^ V v^<\V \"VX** ^ Uoa. L V ^ rVa-S v 

# £•«-« > X T 

# T S • ^ s 

# x ^ o ^ 1 ^ ,««- , <^- c 

# T

- ^ ^ ^ 

# «^>-o 

# \-*x ^ ft>*x*.._S

### P. 3 

# 1 RADIA N

TELEPHON E CAL L RECOR O Olncoain g Cal l Doucgoln g Cal l Perso n Cellin g Perso n Celle d Genere l Subjec t Projec tNo . Projec tNeo

M Dac e

Activit y Activit y Tie * Distributio n



## ^

TOPIC S OISCUSSE D AN D ACTIO N TAKE N 

# ^>^ v <4L - 

# •<\^a r

S< 

# S P 

# ^ o ^ 

# v_ vw •^V ' 

# V Co6-S-, VC^Q-^S- ^'^^ ^ N 

# x5K^ > 

# X^ N 

# J 

# V^r^ " ** ^ 

# A N o x 

# I^ _ Vfli . sr- ^o . > o — ^ - 

# V 6 X - 

# \ x 

# ^ s - «a » x Ox . ' ox^^i r ^x-^ ~ W-^-v v 

# i

^
^ • ^ - i ^ , V-^g - O—^J^SNw ^ X . ^ 

# ^>s^-<L\^s ^

>-g^- s 

# ^q-S - 

# , , <>^ 

# ^N^ ^CaOv V ^x-crvx^. . Qs_ : 

# >s_X . 

# Sy 

# 3^ 7- 

# \i\~[ -

Si«nacur e
# Official Journal C 104/2013

| | ISSN 1977-091X
  doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2013.104.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 104 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5610 April 2013 |

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2013.104.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 104

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5610 April 2013

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2013/C 104/01 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the TFEU — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (1) | 1 |
| 2013/C 104/02 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.6834 — Goldman Sachs/TPG Lundy/Brookgate) (1) | 6 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2013/C 104/01

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the TFEU — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (1)

1

2013/C 104/02

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.6834 — Goldman Sachs/TPG Lundy/Brookgate) (1)

6

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2013/C 104/03 | Euro exchange rates | 7 |
| | NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES |
| 2013/C 104/04 | Binding tariff information | 8 |
| 2013/C 104/05 | Commission information notice pursuant to Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community — Repeal of public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services (1) | 13 |
| 2013/C 104/06 | Commission information notice pursuant to Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community — Public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services (1) | 14 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2013/C 104/03

Euro exchange rates

7

NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES

2013/C 104/04

Binding tariff information

8

2013/C 104/05

Commission information notice pursuant to Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community — Repeal of public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services (1)

13

2013/C 104/06

Commission information notice pursuant to Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community — Public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services (1)

14

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN