alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 7
<CURRENCY> US
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           1065907
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                          1065907
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                            1065907
<EQUITIES>                                        1709
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 1067616
<CASH>                                           45505
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                               72594
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                           10441
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1504146
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                 450781
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                             248250
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     224950
<COMMON>                                         70973
<OTHER-SE>                                      269215
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1504146
<PREMIUMS>                                      587752
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                              54847
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                2995
<OTHER-INCOME>                                       0
<BENEFITS>                                      439681
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                      31202
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                             25828
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 139012
<INCOME-TAX>                                     47415
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              91597
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     91597
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.12
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
# Official Journal C 107/2014

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 107 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 579 April 2014 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 107

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 579 April 2014

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | Council |
| 2014/C 107/01 | Common Military List of the European Union | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

Council

2014/C 107/01

Common Military List of the European Union

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
No. 53722.

protests 144731-K, etc. (New York).

#### J. B. De Macedo & Co. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial it was stipulated that the issues and facts herein are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *Browne Vintners Co., Inc.*(34 C. C. P. A. 112, C. A. D. 351) and that the quantities reported by the inspector as manifested, not found, were not in fact received by the importers. In accordance with stipulation and following the decision cited it was held that the merchandise, insofar as it involves the quantities reported by the inspector as manifested, not found, is subject to an allowance in duties. The protests were sustained to this extent.
EXHIBIT 32.2
------------

                              UNITED-GUARDIAN, INC.
                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of  United-Guardian,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the quarter  ended  September  30, 2005, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I,  Kenneth H. Globus,  President  and Chief  Financial  Officer of the Company,
hereby  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  section  1350,  as adopted  pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

        (1) the Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)the  information  contained  in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


Date:  November 10, 2005                  /s/ Kenneth H. Globus
                                          --------------------------
                                          Kenneth H. Globus
                                          President and Chief Financial Officer
Case: 2:12-cv-00748-MHW-EPD Doc #: 17 Filed: 09/30/13 Page: 1 of 12  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00748-MHW-EPD Doc #: 17 Filed: 09/30/13 Page: 2 of 12  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00748-MHW-EPD Doc #: 17 Filed: 09/30/13 Page: 3 of 12  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00748-MHW-EPD Doc #: 17 Filed: 09/30/13 Page: 4 of 12  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00748-MHW-EPD Doc #: 17 Filed: 09/30/13 Page: 5 of 12  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00748-MHW-EPD Doc #: 17 Filed: 09/30/13 Page: 6 of 12  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00748-MHW-EPD Doc #: 17 Filed: 09/30/13 Page: 7 of 12  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00748-MHW-EPD Doc #: 17 Filed: 09/30/13 Page: 8 of 12  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00748-MHW-EPD Doc #: 17 Filed: 09/30/13 Page: 9 of 12  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00748-MHW-EPD Doc #: 17 Filed: 09/30/13 Page: 10 of 12  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00748-MHW-EPD Doc #: 17 Filed: 09/30/13 Page: 11 of 12  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00748-MHW-EPD Doc #: 17 Filed: 09/30/13 Page: 12 of 12  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-11T21:31:57-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
No. 62065.

#### Stern & Stern Textiles, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 246936-K, 242295-K, and 223235-K (New York).

*598Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items of the merchandise are the same in all material respects as those the subject of *E. C. Carter & Son, Inc.*v. *United States*(38 Cust. Ct. 368, C. D. 1889), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
# Patent

## Title
Halogen derivatives of alkynoxymethyl amines

## Abstract

The test results show that the quaternary ammonium co-polymers are non-foaming in distilled water, and in hard water.

## Background
## Claims

1. A product formed by the condensation of a mixture of difunctional tertiary amines and a molar quantity of 1,4-dichloro-2-butene that is substantially equal to the molar sum of the mixture of difunctional tertiary amines, said mixture of difunctional tertiary amines being selected from the group consisting of (a) 1,4-bis-(dimethylamino)-2-butene and N,N,N',N'-tetramethyl ethylene diamine, and (b) 1,4-bis-(dimethylamino)-2-butene and 1,4-bis-(methyl dodecylamino)-2-butene, the components of each mixture being present in a molar proportion of between 10% and 90% of the mixture.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 330 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 330

 Relative to the death of Eugene Joseph McCarthy, former United States 
                  Senator for the State of Minnesota.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 12, 2005

 Mr. Frist (for himself, Mr. Reid, Mr. Coleman, Mr. Dayton, Mr. Akaka, 
    Mr. Alexander, Mr. Allard, Mr. Allen, Mr. Baucus, Mr. Bayh, Mr. 
Bennett, Mr. Biden, Mr. Bingaman, Mr. Bond, Mrs. Boxer, Mr. Brownback, 
 Mr. Bunning, Mr. Burns, Mr. Burr, Mr. Byrd, Ms. Cantwell, Mr. Carper, 
 Mr. Chafee, Mr. Chambliss, Mrs. Clinton, Mr. Coburn, Mr. Cochran, Ms. 
Collins, Mr. Conrad, Mr. Cornyn, Mr. Corzine, Mr. Craig, Mr. Crapo, Mr. 
DeMint, Mr. DeWine, Mr. Dodd, Mrs. Dole, Mr. Domenici, Mr. Dorgan, Mr. 
Durbin, Mr. Ensign, Mr. Enzi, Mr. Feingold, Mrs. Feinstein, Mr. Graham, 
    Mr. Grassley, Mr. Gregg, Mr. Hagel, Mr. Harkin, Mr. Hatch, Mrs. 
   Hutchison, Mr. Inhofe, Mr. Inouye, Mr. Isakson, Mr. Jeffords, Mr. 
 Johnson, Mr. Kennedy, Mr. Kerry, Mr. Kohl, Mr. Kyl, Ms. Landrieu, Mr. 
  Lautenberg, Mr. Leahy, Mr. Levin, Mr. Lieberman, Mrs. Lincoln, Mr. 
Lott, Mr. Lugar, Mr. Martinez, Mr. McCain, Mr. McConnell, Ms. Mikulski, 
   Ms. Murkowski, Mrs. Murray, Mr. Nelson of Florida, Mr. Nelson of 
Nebraska, Mr. Obama, Mr. Pryor, Mr. Reed, Mr. Roberts, Mr. Rockefeller, 
Mr. Salazar, Mr. Santorum, Mr. Sarbanes, Mr. Schumer, Mr. Sessions, Mr. 
 Shelby, Mr. Smith, Ms. Snowe, Mr. Specter, Ms. Stabenow, Mr. Stevens, 
    Mr. Sununu, Mr. Talent, Mr. Thomas, Mr. Thune, Mr. Vitter, Mr. 
     Voinovich, Mr. Warner, and Mr. Wyden) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Relative to the death of Eugene Joseph McCarthy, former United States 
                  Senator for the State of Minnesota.

Whereas Eugene J. McCarthy devoted many years of his life to teaching in public 
        high schools and other institutions of higher learning in the service of 
        the youth of our Nation;
Whereas Eugene J. McCarthy served in the House of Representativess from 1949 to 
        1959; and
Whereas Eugene J. McCarthy served the people of Minnesota with distinction from 
        1959 to 1971 in the United States Senate: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate has heard with profound sorrow and deep 
regret the announcement of the death of the Honorable Eugene J. 
McCarthy, former member of the United States Senate.
    Resolved, That the Secretary of the Senate communicate these 
resolutions to the House of Representatives and transmit an enrolled 
copy thereof to the family of the deceased.
    Resolved, That when the Senate adjourns today, it stand adjourned 
as a further mark of respect to the memory of the Honorable Eugene J. 
McCarthy.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000,000
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                   SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                             85
<SECURITIES>                      707
<RECEIVABLES>                   3,177
<ALLOWANCES>                        0
<INVENTORY>                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                    0
<PP&E>                          3,252
<DEPRECIATION>                  1,086
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                 46,349
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               0
<BONDS>                             0
<COMMON>                           68
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>               0
<PREFERRED>                       315
<OTHER-SE>                      3,710
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>   46,349
<SALES>                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                4,583
<CGS>                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                3,441
<LOSS-PROVISION>                   77
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                535
<INCOME-PRETAX>                   530
<INCOME-TAX>                      169
<INCOME-CONTINUING>               361
<DISCONTINUED>                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                     0
<CHANGES>                           0
<NET-INCOME>                      361
<EPS-PRIMARY>                    5.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                    5.04

</TABLE>
#### Stewart *v.*Stewart, Appellant.

*Divorce a mensa et thoro*— Adultery—Evidence.

A decree in divorce, a mensa et thoro, is properly granted where the respondent’s misconduct is established in as satisfactory a manner as that fact is ever established by circumstantial evidence.

Argued November 19, 1924.

Appeal, No. 76, April T., 1925, by respondent, from decree of O. P. Allegheny Co., July T., 1921, No. 2506, granting a divorce, a mensa et thoro, in the case of Marion S. Stewart v. George W. Stewart.

Before Orlady, P. J., Henderson, Trexler, Keller, Linn and Gawthrop, JJ.

Affirmed.

Libel in divorce, a mensa et thoro. Before Drew, J.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the Superior Court.

*42February 27, 1925:

The case was referred to Frank A. Piekarski, Esq., as master, who recommended that a divorce be refused.

On exceptions to the master’s report the court sus-' tained the exceptions and granted a divorce, a mensa et thoro. Respondent appealed.

*Error assigned*was the decree of the court.

*Joseph Stadtfeld,*for appellant.

*Thomas M. Marshall, Jr.,*and with him *Thomas M. Marshall,*for appellee.

Opinion by

Gawthrop, J.,

The parties to this proceeding in divorce are the same as in No. 75, April Term, 1925. But here the libel was filed by the wife, charging the husband with adultery and asking for a divorce a mensa et thoro with alimony. The respondent is now paying the libellant $100 a month for her support and maintenance. The same master who recommended a divorce in the other case found that in this the charge was not sustained by the evidence and recommended that a divorce be refused. Again the court below disagreed with the master and entered a decree separating the libellant from the respondent from bed and board, reserving the fixing of the alimony until testimony is taken with relation to the estate of the husband and his ability to pay. The only question raised by the assignments of error is whether under the evidence the appellant is entitled to the decree. Again we agree with the .court below, but deem it undesirable to discuss the testimony in detail. The evidence of the respondent’s adultery is established in as satisfactory a manner as that fact is ever established by circumstantial evidence. The corespondent took refuge in flight and did not appear at the hearing, although an effort was made by the libellant to subpoena her. The testimony of the defend*43ant tended to strengthen rather than weaken the wife’s case.

The decree is affirmed at the appellant’s cost.

Porter, J., did not sit in this case and took no part in its decision.
(logo) Rialto CAPITAL

 

 

2016 Annual Statement ofServicer Compliance (Item 1123)

 

 

Pooling and ServicingAgreement (the “Pooling and Servicing Agreement”) dated as ofFebruary 1, 2016 by and among Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Securities, Inc.,as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as Master Servicer, RialtoCapital Advisors, LLC as Special Servicer, Park Bridge Lender Services LLC asOperating Advisor and Asset Representations Reviewer, Wells Fargo Bank,National Association as Certificate Administrator, and Wilmington Trust,National Association as Trustee relating to the Wells Fargo Commercial MortgageTrust 2016-NXS5, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series2016-NXS5 **(WFCM 2016-NXS5)**

 

The undersigned, a dulyauthorized officer of Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as special servicer (the“Special Servicer”) herein certifies to the following:

 

1.  All servicingactivities and performance of such servicing activities under the Pooling andServicing Agreement are performed on behalf of the Special Servicer.

 

2.  A review of the servicing activities andperformance by the Special Servicer for the period of February 26, 2016 toDecember 31, 2016 (the “Reporting Period”) in accordance with thePooling and Servicing Agreement has been conducted under my supervision.

 

3.  To the best of my knowledge, based onsuch review, the Special Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations underthe terms of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, in all material respects for theReporting Period and if there has been a failure to fulfill any suchobligations in any material respect, each failure and the nature and statusthereof has been specifically identified herein.

 

 

Certified by: /s/Adam Singer

Adam Singer, Managing Director

Date: March 1, 2017
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 82 (Monday, April 30, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 21298]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-8131]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration


Manufacturer of Controlled Substances Notice of Application

    Pursuant to Sec.  1301.33(a) of Title 21 of the Code of Federal 
Regulations (CFR), this is notice that on March 1, 2007, Organichem 
Corporation, 33 Riverside Avenue, Rensselaer, New York 12144, made 
application by letter to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to 
be registered as a bulk manufacturer of Oxymorphone (9652), a basic 
class of controlled substance listed in schedule II.
    The company plans on manufacturing the listed controlled substance 
in bulk for sale to its customers.
    Any other such applicant and any person who is presently registered 
with DEA to manufacture such a substance may file comments or 
objections to the issuance of the proposed registration pursuant to 21 
CFR 1301.33(a).
    Any such written comments or objections being sent via regular mail 
should be addressed, in quintuplicate, to the Drug Enforcement 
Administration, Office of Diversion Control, Attention: DEA Federal 
Register Representative (ODL), Washington, DC 20537, or any being sent 
via express mail should be sent to Drug Enforcement Administration, 
Office of Diversion Control, Federal Register Representative (ODL), 
2401 Jefferson-Davis Highway, Alexandria, Virginia 22301; and must be 
filed no later than June 29, 2007.

    Dated: April 17, 2007.
Joseph T. Rannazzisi,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
 [FR Doc. E7-8131 Filed 4-27-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                       4,741,885
<SECURITIES>                                 2,470,885
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,567,773
<ALLOWANCES>                                    17,757
<INVENTORY>                                     15,342
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            10,155,224
<PP&E>                                      32,777,679
<DEPRECIATION>                              24,658,784
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              18,826,581
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,075,501
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        20,925
<OTHER-SE>                                  16,365,005
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                18,826,581
<SALES>                                     14,077,748
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            14,077,748
<CGS>                                       12,463,214
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               13,658,382
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                775,381
<INCOME-TAX>                                    54,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            721,381
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   721,381
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .35
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .35
        


</TABLE>
# Appendix 7

Public Notice Report,

Comments Received and Responses(This page intentionally left blank)

### Public Notice Report

For The North Carolina State Implementation Plan

Inspection and Maintenance (I/M) Program

On April 6, 2010, a draft version of Inspect ion and Maintenance (I/M) Program State Implementation Plan (SIP) was submitted to the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). A request for public hearing, in accordance with 40 CFR 51.102, and the public comment period were noticed in the local ne wspapers on Monday, April 5, 2010. The public comment period was open from April 5, 2010, through May 14, 2010, with no hearing scheduled unless one was requested in writing by Wednesday May 5, 2010. No request for public hearing

was received. There were no comment s received on the I/M program SIP.

Background

The purpose of the I/M Program SIP is to satisfy the USEPA’s requirements for the State to meet and/or maintain the National Ambient Air Qual ity Standards (NAAQS) for carbon monoxide and

ozone. This document revises the State of Nort h Carolina basic I/M program SIP due to changes to the I/M program since the last approved I/M SIP in 1993 and to demonstrate compliance with the basic performance standards for the 1997 8-hour ozone standard. The program changes include testing vehicles by usi ng the On-board Diagnostic (OBD ) system instead of tailpipe emissions and the expansion of the program cove rage area from nine counties to 48 counties.

The SIP also demonstrates that North Caro lina’s I/M program meets the USEPA basic I/M performance standard for the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS.

Summary of Public Notice and Comment Period

The public comment period was from April 5, 2010 through May 14, 2010. The only written response received was from Richard A. Schutt, Ch ief, Air Planning Branch, USEPA, stating that they had no comments on the I/M Program SIP.

Conclusions

Since no comments were received, the North Carolina Division of Air Quality will move forward with the final submittal to the USEPA of the State Implementation Plan for the Inspection and Maintenance Program.

Public Notice Report

North Carolina I/M SIP May 21, 2010 Appendix 7-1