alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 23 - 0219 and DA 23 - 0279

_________________ IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF: MIKI L. ADAMS,

Petitioner and Appellee, and DIRK S. ADAMS,

Respondent and Appellant. O R D E R

_________________ Pursuant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, th ese cause s are classified for submission on briefs to a five - justice panel of this Court. A review of the record demonstrates that both causes were appealed from the same District Court case, DR - 2020 - 43. In the interest of judicial economy , the Court has determined to consolidat e the two cau ses for purposes of appeal under DA 23 - 0219 . The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to all counsel of r ecord and to the Honorable Yvonne Laird , District Judge . For the Court,

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

January 31 2024

01/31/2024
Exhibit 4.1


 





Alaia Capital, LLC


62 West 45th St.


5th Floor


New York, NY 10036


 


April 1, 2022


 
m+ Buffer 20 Fund, m+ funds Trust, Series 1-26




 


c/o The Bank of New York Mellon, as Trustee


240 Greenwich Street, 22W Floor


New York, New York 10286


 


		Re:	m+ funds Trust, Series 1-26 (the “Trust”)



 


 


Ladies and Gentlemen:


 


We have examined Amendment No. 1 to the Registration
Statement (File No. 333-263748) for the above captioned Trust. We hereby consent to the use in the Registration Statement of the references
to Alaia Capital, LLC as evaluator.


 


You are hereby authorized to file a copy of this
letter with the Securities and Exchange Commission.


 


 


 


	 	Very truly yours,	 
	 	 	 
	 	Alaia Capital, LLC	 
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Ian Shainbrown	 
	 	 	Name: Ian Shainbrown	 
	 	 	Title:  Executive Vice President
### Executiv e Orde r 1286 6 an d Congressiona l Revie w Requirement s Rulemakin g Documea t

Title : ^^.O^^A ^ K >''^ck^' J ^" ^ ^^^^' ^ ' ^

Withrespec t

t o th e attache drulemakin g document(s) : 1 . E.O . 12866 : Th e requirement s o f sectio n 6(a)(3)(E ) o f

E.O . 1286 6 hav e bee nme t i naccordanc e withth e followin g [initia l appropriat e line] :

- / • Th e rulemakin g document(s ) wa s no t reviewe db y th e Offic e o f Informatio nan d Regulatory Affair s (OIRA) . N o substantiv e change s wer e mad e t o th e document(s ) afte r i t wa s submitte dt o OlRA . Th e require dinformatio ni s attached . 2 . Congressiona l Review : Th e requirement s o f th e Smal l Busines s Regulatory Enforcemen t Fairnes s Ac t for th e submissio n o f

final rule s t o Congres s an dGA O ( § 801 ) hav e bee nme t i naccordanc e withth e followin g [initia l appropriat e line] :

^^^ ^ Thi s documen t

i s no t afina l rule . Thi s documen t

i s no t arul e unde r

( § 804) .
" ^ Th e documen t

ha s bee nsubmitte dt o C-5 0 fo r transmissio nt o Congres s an dGAO . 

### ^/•'\ ^ ( ' --^ z ^ Signatur e ^ 

# y- l A i \A Nam e Title/Offic e 

# sUll o Dat e
Aris Industries, Inc. Certification under Section 906 of the Sarbanes/Oxley Act
        - Filed as an Exhibit to 10-Q for the Quarter Ended June 30, 2002

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Aris Industries, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof ("Report"), I, Paul Spector, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
the best of my knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


/s/ PAUL SPECTOR
---------------------------------------
Paul Spector
Chief Financial Officer
August 14, 2002
Pursuant to 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 , the court has determi ned that this opinionsho uld not * be publishe d an d is not precede nt except und er the limit ed circu mstance s set forth in 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 .4. 

### INTHE U NI TED S TATESCOU RT OFAPPEALS

FORTHE FIFTH CIRCU IT

N o. 09- 10537 Su m m ar y Cal endar

UN I TE D S TA TE S OF AM ERI CA, P l ai n t i f f

- A pp el l ee

v. RO NAL D D AV I S ON , D e fe nda nt

- Appe l l ant

A pp eal f

rom t h e U n i t ed S t ates D i st ri ctC ou rt f or t h e N ort h ern D i st ri ctof T exas U SD C N o. 3: 07- C R

- 283- 1

B ef ore G A R Z A , C L E M E N T , an d O W E N , C i rcui t Ju dg es. P E R C U R I A M: * Th e Feder al Pu bl i c D ef ender appoi nt ed t o r epr es ent R onal d D avi so n has
m o ve d f o r l e av e t o w i t hdr aw a nd has f i l e d a b r i e f

i n a c c o r da nc e w i t h A nder s v. C a lifor n ia , 3 8 6 U. S

. 7 3 8 ( 1 9 6 7 )

. Da v i s o n h a s n o t f i l e d a r e s p o n s e . O ur i nde pe nde nt r e vi e w o f t he r e c o r d a nd c o uns e l ’ s b r i e f di s c l o s e s no no nf

r i vo l o us is s u e fo r a p p e a l. A c c o r d i n g ly , co u n s e l’ s m o tio n fo r le a v e to w ith d r a w is GRANTED, c o u n s e l i s e x c u s e d f r o m f u r t h e r r e s p o n s i b i l i t i e s h e r e i n , a nd t he A P P E A L IS D IS M IS S E D

. S ee 5 T H C IR
. R. 42. 2. United States Court of A pp eals Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D Februar y 23, 2010 Cha rl es R. F ulb ru g e II I Clerk Case: 09-10537 Document: 00511033022 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/23/2010
# C_2015320EN.01001402.xml

| 28.9.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 320/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.9.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 320/14

---

Order of the Court (Third Chamber) of 14 July 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal da Relação de Coimbra — Portugal) — Sociedade Portuguesa de Autores CRL v Ministério Público, Carlos Manuel Prata Pereira Sá Meneses, Sandra Carla Ferreira Cardoso, Douros Bar Lda

(Case C-151/15) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Copyright and related rights in the information society - Directive 2001/29/EC - Article 3(1) - Concept of ‘communication to the public’ - Broadcasting of works in a café-restaurant by means of a radio apparatus connected to loudspeakers))

(2015/C 320/20)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunal da Relação de Coimbra

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Sociedade Portuguesa de Autores CRL

Applicant:

Defendants: Ministério Público, Carlos Manuel Prata Pereira Sá Meneses, Sandra Carla Ferreira Cardoso, Douros Bar Lda

Defendants:

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

The concept of ‘communication to the public’ within the meaning of Article 3(1) of Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society must be interpreted as meaning that it covers the transmission, by operators of a café-restaurant, of musico-literary works broadcast by a radio broadcasting station, by means of a radio apparatus connected to loudspeakers and/or amplifiers, to the customers present in that establishment.

---

(1)  OJ C 205, 22.6.2015.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 7
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                    JUN-30-1997
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                              1,044,857
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                             1,044,857
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                               1,044,857
<EQUITIES>                                            1,300
<MORTGAGE>                                                0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                             0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                    1,046,157
<CASH>                                               47,171
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                   72,910
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                                8,891
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    1,512,740
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                     473,553
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                 251,859
<POLICY-OTHER>                                            0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                     0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                           0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                         224,950
<COMMON>                                             70,510
<OTHER-SE>                                          229,567
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      1,512,740
<PREMIUMS>                                          390,076
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                                  36,235
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                    1,543
<OTHER-INCOME>                                            0
<BENEFITS>                                          296,443
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                          20,612
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                                 15,941
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      88,243
<INCOME-TAX>                                         29,864
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  58,379
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                         58,379
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                           .81
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           .73
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                            0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                       0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                         0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                        0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                          0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                           0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                                   0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                   5

<MULTIPLIER>                1
       
<S>                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            FEB-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                 NOV-02-1996
<CASH>                                           224,000
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 38,917,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                    5,089,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1,439,000
<PP&E>                                         5,090,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 3,914,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                65,259,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         30,669,000
<BONDS>                                       18,578,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                         119,000
<OTHER-SE>                                    15,893,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  91,092,000
<SALES>                                      124,703,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             124,703,000
<CGS>                                         99,482,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 99,482,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              14,784,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             6,333,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (5,760,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     303,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            3,801,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               11,527,000
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                  15,328,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       0.32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       1.29
        


</TABLE>
Site Location: Goldendale, Washington Site Location: Browning, Montana

Site Location: Stanford, Montana

Data for: Jan2004 – Dec2005

Tower type/height: 24m standard guyed.

Commission date October 31, 2003. 

Host site: Ed Kennell.

Bergey 10-kW Excel-S wind turbines, each equipped with the same blades, were installed at sites in the Pacific Northwest as part of Northwest 

Sustainable Energy for Economic Development’s Our Wind Cooperative. Each installation was instrumented with data acquisition systems to 

collect a minimum of two years of operating data. The four turbines highlighted in this poster were installed between 2003 and 2004. Wind speed 

predictions were taken from available wind resource maps for Montana and Washington and modeled at hub height. Measured wind speeds were 

measured at anemometer height (6m below hub height) and adjusted to hub height. At all sites, the annual average data recovery was 80% or 

better. Manufacturer power curves and performance have been adjusted for the elevation at each site. Deviations from predicted performance 

may be due to equipment, operator, or the environment. 

Data for: Feb2004 – Feb2006

Tower type/height: 18m standard guyed.

Commission date February 20, 2004.

Host site: Doug Nelson.

Data for: Jan2004 – Dec2005

Tower type/height: 30m standard guyed.

Commission date October 8, 2003.

Host site: Jess Alger.

Site Location: Liberty County, Montana

Data for: Feb2004 – Feb2006

Tower type/height: 24m tilt-up.

Commission date: February 24, 2004.

Host site: Liberty County.

REGIONAL FIELD VERIFICATION PROJECT REGIONAL FIELD VERIFICATION PROJECT – OPERATIONAL OPERATIONAL

Karin Sinclair, National Renewable Energy Laboratory

Jessica Raker, Northwest Sustainable Energy for Economic Development

RESULTS FROM FOUR SMALL WIND TURBINES RESULTS FROM FOUR SMALL WIND TURBINES

Performance Data (kWh/y)

• Based on predicted wind speed: 

• Based on measured wind speed: 

• Actual measured performance: 

Predicted:

Measured:

Wind Speed (m/s)

Performance Data (kWh/y)

• Based on predicted wind speed:

• Based on measured wind speed:

• Actual measured performance:

Predicted: 

Measured: 

Wind Speed (m/s)

Performance Data (kWh/y)

• Based on predicted wind speed:

• Based on measured wind speed:

• Actual measured performance:

Predicted: 

Measured: 

Wind Speed (m/s)

Performance Data (kWh/y)

• Based on predicted wind speed:

• Based on measured wind speed:

• Actual measured performance:

Predicted: 

Measured: 

Wind Speed (m/s)

The information contained in this poster is subject to a government license · WINDPOWER 2006 · Pittsburgh, PA · June 4-7, 2006 · NREL/PO-500-39831

5.9

5.8

5.7

5.6

6.1

5.8

5.7

4.6

18,485

17,473

12,577

18,034

15,969

11,389

15,959

15,679

8,424

16,242

9,786

7,926
##### 



Exhibit 15

LETTER RE: UNAUDITED FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Audit Committee of the
Board of Directors
TRW Inc.

We are aware of the incorporation by reference in the following registration
statements and in the related prospectuses of our report dated July 18, 2002,
except for the Subsequent Event note, as to which the date is July 26, 2002,
relating to the unaudited consolidated interim financial statements of TRW Inc.
that are included in its Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2002.

|         |  |  |           | 
|-------- |  |  | --------- | 
|Form S-3 |  |  | 333-89133 | 
|        
|        
|        
|        
|Form S-3 |  |  | 333-48443 | 
|        
|        
|        
|        
|Form S-8 |  |  | 333-68242 | 
|        
|        
|        
|        
|Form S-8 |  |  | 333-61198 | 
|        
|        
|        
|        
|Form S-8 |  |  | 333-61192 | 
|        
|        
|        
|        
|Form S-8 |  |  | 333-37906 | 
|        
|        
|        
|        
|Form S-8 |  |  | 333-36052 | 
|        
|        
|        
|        
|Form S-8 |  |  | 333-27003 | 
|        
|        
|        
|        
|Form S-8 |  |  | 333-27001 | 
|        
|        
|        
|        
|Form S-8 |  |  | 333-20351 | 
|        
|        
|        
|        
|Form S-8 |  |  | 333-06633 | 
|        
|        
|        
|        
|Form S-8 |  |  | 333-03973 | 
|        
|        
|        
|        
|Form S-8 |  |  | 33-53503  | 
|        
|        
|        
|        
|Form S-8 |  |  | 33-29751  | 
|        
|        
|        
|        
|Form S-8 |  |  | 2-90748   | 
|        
|        
|        
|        
|Form S-8 |  |  | 2-64035   | 



| |  |                  
| |  | -----------------
| |  | /s/ ERNST & YOUNG

August 12, 2002
Cleveland, Ohio
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 81 (Friday, April 27, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21013-21014]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-8045]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes

[[Page 21014]]

and regulations to become a bank holding company and/or to acquire the 
assets or the ownership of, control of, or the power to vote shares of 
a bank or bank holding company and all of the banks and nonbanking 
companies owned by the bank holding company, including the companies 
listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States. 
Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained 
from the National Information Center Web site at http://www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than May 21, 2007.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of New York (Anne MacEwen, Bank 
Applications Officer) 33 Liberty Street, New York, New York 10045-0001:
    1. Orange County Bancorp, Inc., to become a bank holding company by 
acquiring 100 percent of the voting shares of Orange County Trust 
Company, both of Middletown, New York.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco (Tracy Basinger, Director, 
Regional and Community Bank Group) 101 Market Street, San Francisco, 
California 94105-1579:
    1. Manhattan Bancorp, to become a bank holding company by acquiring 
100 percent of the voting shares of Bank of Manhattan, N.A. (in 
organization), both of El Segundo, California.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, April 23, 
2007.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. E7-8045 Filed 4-26-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
EXHIBIT 32.2
 
 
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
 SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In connection with the quarterly report of United-Guardian, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the three-month period ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Robert S. Rubinger, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (i) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (ii) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented and results of operations of the Company for the periods presented.
 
 
 Date:  May 7, 2010
 
 By:   /s/ Robert S. Rubinger
 Robert S. Rubinger
No. 54865.

#### Charles A. Andres et al. *v.*United States,

protests 151724-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of reptile skins the same in all material respects as those passed upon in *Fleming-Joffe, Ltd.*v. *United States*(25 Cust. Ct. 56, C. D. 1263), the claim for free entry under paragraph 1765 was sustained.
No. 50265.

#### Protest 103924-K of R. C. Nelms, Jr. (San Antonio).

Opinion by

Cole, J.

Defendant’s motion to dismiss the protest was granted.
No. 49380.

Suit 4458.

#### *Ringling Bros. Barnum & Bailey Combined Shows, Inc.*v. *United States.*

affirmed March 6, 1944. C. A. D. 272.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

AVERI RUSSEL,

Petitioner

v.

MONROEVILLE MALL

- PA, MONROEVILLE MALL PARTNERS, L.P.,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 172 WAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 12th day of September, 2017

, the Petition for Allowance of

Appeal is DENIED

.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-6982

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

ANTHONY LEE THAMES,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior

District Judge. (CR-00-122-7-1-FO, CA-02-56-F)

Submitted: October 1, 2003 Decided: October 17, 2003

Before WIDENER and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anthony Lee Thames, Appellant Pro Se. Eric Evenson, OFFICE OF THE

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Anthony Lee Thames seeks to appeal the district court’s order

dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. An

appeal may not be taken from the final order in a habeas corpus

proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate

of appealability. This Court will not issue a certificate of

appealability as to claims dismissed by a district court on

procedural grounds unless the movant can demonstrate both “(1)

‘that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the

petition [or motion] states a valid claim of the denial of a

constitutional right’ and (2) ‘that jurists of reason would find it

debatable whether the district court was correct in its procedural

ruling.’” Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 684 (4th Cir.) (quoting Slack

v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 941

(2001). The relevant inquiry for claims addressed on the merits is

whether “reasonable jurists would find the district court’s

assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong.”

Slack, 529 U.S. at 484.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that

Thames has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a

certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
3

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED