1

2016 SUPPORTING STATEMENT

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

The National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan Regulation, 

Subpart J (40 CFR 300.900)

1. Identification of the Information Collection

1(a) Title and Number of the Information Collection

The National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan Regulation, 

Subpart J (40 CFR 300.900) (Renewal)

ICR # 1664.11, OMB # 2050-0141

1(b) Short Characterization/Abstract

This Information Collection Request (ICR) renewal supports activities to implement the 

National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP), Subpart J (40 CFR 

300.900, “Use of Dispersants and Other Chemicals”).

The use of bioremediation agents, dispersants, surface washing agents, surface collecting 

agents and miscellaneous oil spill control agents (MOSCAs) in response to oil spills in U.S. 

waters or adjoining shorelines is governed by Subpart J of the NCP regulation (40 CFR 

300.900). Subpart J requirements include criteria for listing oil spill mitigating agents on the 

NCP Product Schedule, hereafter referred to as the Schedule. EPA’s regulation, which is 

codified at 40 CFR 300.00, requires that EPA prepare a schedule of “dispersants, other 

chemicals, and other spill mitigating devices and substances, if any, that may be used in carrying 

out the NCP.” The Schedule is required by section 311(d)(2)(G) of the Clean Water Act (CWA), 

as amended by the Oil Pollution Act of 1990. The Schedule is used by Federal On-Scene 

Coordinators (FOSCs), Regional Response Teams (RRTs), and Area Planners to identify spill 

mitigating agents in preparation and response to oil spills.

 

Under Subpart J, respondents who want to add a product to the Schedule must submit 

technical product data to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA or Agency) as 

stipulated in 40 CFR 300.915. Specifically, Subpart J requires the manufacturer to conduct 

specific toxicity and effectiveness tests and submit the corresponding technical product data 

along with other detailed information to the EPA Oil Program Center in the Office of Emergency

Management, Office of Land and Emergency Response [formerly the Office of Solid Waste and 

Emergency Response (OSWER)]. For example, a dispersant must exceed the 50-percent (±5 

percent) efficacy threshold in order to be listed on the Schedule. EPA places oil spill mitigating 

agents on the Schedule if all the required data are submitted and the product satisfies all 

requirements and meets or exceeds testing thresholds. The Product Schedule is available to 

FOSCs, RRTs, and Area Committees for determining the most appropriate products to use in 

various spill scenarios.
2

Products currently listed on the Product Schedule are divided into five basic categories: 

dispersants, surface washing agents, surface collecting agents, bioremediation agents, and 

miscellaneous oil spill control agents. There are 117 products currently listed on the Schedule 

(as of March 2016). It is estimated that 11 products per year will be submitted to EPA for listing 

on the Schedule. Over the three-year period covered by this ICR, an estimated 33 products may

be listed. Additionally, EPA estimates that approximately 10 manufacturers will submit 

information to obtain sorbent certifications. The annual public reporting burden will be 315

hours. The total annual cost (including labor and non-labor) to manufacturers under Subpart J is 

estimated to be $89,590.69.

On January 22, 2015, the National Oil and Hazardous Substance Contingency Plan;

Proposed Rule for Subpart J was released on the Federal Register (80 FR 3380) for a public 

comment period of 90 days. A total of 81,972 comments were collected during the comment 

period. The Proposed Subpart Rule has a separate ICR (ICR # 1664.10, OMB # 2050-0141) that 

covers the proposed amendments. A copy of the Proposed Subpart J rule and accompanying ICR 

can be found in the following EPA docket: EPA-HQ-OPA-2006-0090. The Agency is proposing 

to amend the requirements in Subpart J of the NCP. The proposed amendments to Subpart J 

would require that manufacturers conduct efficacy and toxicity tests for each chemical and 

biological agent consistent with the analytical test methods and criteria in the revised Appendix 

C to part 300. The proposal both revises existing analytical tests and criteria and adds new 

efficacy and toxicity tests in Appendix C to part 300. All manufacturers incur costs on a onetime only basis to list products on the Schedule. The manufacturers with products that are on the 

current Schedule will be required to retest their products using the new efficacy and toxicity

tests. The manufacturers of new products will be required to test their products using the new test 

methods and meet the new testing criteria. This ICR renewal (ICR # 1664.11) covers the current 

existing Subpart J rule promulgated in 1994.

2. Need For and Use of the Collection

2(a) Need/Authority for the Collection

Section 311(d)(2)(G) of the Clean Water Act (CWA), requires a product schedule, 

identifying “dispersants, other chemicals, and other spill mitigating devices and substances, if 

any, that may be used in carrying out” the NCP. The authority of the President to implement the 

CWA is currently delegated to EPA by Executive Order 12777 (56 FR 54757, October 18, 

1991). The use of dispersants, other chemical agents, and biological additives to respond to oil 

spills in U.S. waters is governed by Subpart J of the NCP (40 CFR 300.900).

The Schedule is available for use by FOSCs, RRTs, and Area Committees in determining 

the most appropriate products to use or prohibit in various spill scenarios. Under 40 CFR 

300.910(a), RRTs and Area Committees are required to address the desirability of using the 

products on the Schedule in their Regional Contingency Plans (RCPs) and Area Contingency

Plans (ACPs), respectively. The required information is needed from the respondent so that the 

FOSCs, RRTs, and Area Committees can make informed decisions to safely employ 

chemical/biological countermeasures to control oil discharges. Correct product use is critical in 

emergency situations. Subpart J ensures that FOSCs, RRTs, and Area Committees have 
3

necessary data regarding the toxicity, effectiveness, and other characteristics of different 

products.

To place a product on the Schedule, Subpart J requires that the manufacturer conduct 

specific toxicity and effectiveness tests and submit the corresponding technical product data and 

other required information to the EPA Product Schedule Manager. EPA has established an 

effectiveness threshold for listing dispersants (40 CFR 300.920(a) (2)). Only those dispersants 

that meet or exceed the established threshold will be listed on the Schedule.

At 40 CFR 300.915(d), EPA requires respondents to test bioremediation agents for 

effectiveness, using the testing protocol contained in Appendix C to part 300. The 

Bioremediation Agent Effectiveness Test is used to compare the effectiveness of different 

bioremediation agents. The objective of the effectiveness testing protocol is to provide empirical 

laboratory evidence that evaluates a bioremediation agent’s ability to enhance biodegradation as 

compared to the natural population.

2(b) Practical Utility/Users of the Data

EPA places eligible oil spill mitigating agents on the Schedule if all the required data are 

submitted. The Schedule is available for use by FOSCs, RRTs, and Area Committees in 

determining the most appropriate products to use in various spill scenarios. Under 40 CFR 

300.910(a), RRTs and Area Committees are required to address the desirability of using the 

products on the Schedule in their RCPs and ACPs, respectively. The required information is 

needed from the respondent so that the FOSCs, RRTs, and Area Committees can make informed 

decisions to safely employ chemical/biological countermeasures to control oil discharges. 

Correct product use is critical in emergency situations. Subpart J ensures that FOSCs, RRTs, and 

Area Committees have the necessary data regarding the toxicity, effectiveness, and other 

characteristics of different products.

3. Nonduplication, Consultations, And Other Collection Criteria

3(a) Nonduplication

Manufacturers do not report this information to any other federal agency, and this is the 

only list of its kind on a national level, therefore, there is no duplication.

3(b) Public Notice Required Prior to ICR Submission to OMB

An announcement of a public comment period for the renewal of this ICR was published 

in the Federal Register on March 31, 2016 (XX FR XXX). 

3(c) Consultations

In developing this NCP Subpart J renewal ICR, EPA consulted with other federal 

agencies; FOSCs; NCP Product Schedule experts; state agencies; technical experts, both 

international and domestic; and various commercial laboratories and product manufacturers. A 

few laboratories responded to requests for feedback. In addition, five manufacturers provided 
4

input on EPA's assumptions. A surface washing agent manufacturer, Superall Products LLP,

gave burden estimates that are similar to those in the ICR, so no changes to the supporting 

statement were deemed necessary. A bioremediation agent manufacturer (WMI International,

Inc., 713-956-4001) confirmed that the effectiveness test costs $15,000, which reflects EPA's 

current assumption. 

Results of Calls to Labs

Company Phone Number Comments Results

Coastal Bioanalysts, Inc. 804-694-8285

This lab only conducts toxicity 

testing. The lab agreed that the 

toxicity test cost was reasonable

$3,500

Bonner Analytical Testing

Company

601-264-2854 All testing except toxicity

Bioremediation efficacy 

$12-19,000

SFT $2,500

Pacific EcoRisk 707-207-7760 Lab has more certifications than 

most so they charge more

LC50 $4,200

All physical properties 

such as flash point 

$1,200

Results of Calls to Manufacturers

Company Phone Number Comments Results

Dispersants

AGS Solutions Inc. 713-645-4933 About 40 hours to list dispersant Tox $3500

SFT $2,500

Surface Washing Agents

Superall Products LLP 281-351-4800 The appropriate individual will assess the 

reasonableness of the burden hours.

The manufacturer 

gave burden hours 

similar to our 

estimates.

MAG7 Venture Group 855- 255-6247

Tox $2,200

Analytical $945 for 

2 products

Bioremediation

WMI International Inc. 713-956-4001

Confirmed that an effectiveness test costs 

is in line with EPA estimates. No 

response on burden hours.

$15,000 for 

efficacy

Teamwork Distributing 780-968-5367 This was during BP so EPA considers 

this an anomaly.

$28,000 for 

efficacy.

30 hours of burden.

3(d) Effects of Less Frequent Collection

Respondents must submit information only when they apply to list a new product on the 

Schedule, or when the composition, formulation, application, or contact information of a product 

currently listed on the Schedule is changed. Because collection is not periodic, less frequent 

collection is not possible.
5

3(e) General Guidelines

The information collection activities discussed in this renewal ICR comply with all 

regulatory guidelines under 5 CFR 1320.5(d)(2). 

3(f) Confidentiality

Under 40 CFR 300.920(c), respondents are allowed to assert that certain information in 

the technical product data submissions is confidential business information. EPA will handle 

such claims pursuant to the provisions in 40 CFR Part 2, Subpart B. Such information must be 

submitted separately from non-confidential information, clearly identified, and clearly marked 

“Confidential Business Information.” If the applicant fails to make such a claim at the time of 

submittal, EPA may make the information available to the public without further notice.

3(g) Sensitive Questions

The information collection activities discussed in this document do not involve any

sensitive questions.

4. The Respondents and the Information Requested

4(a) Respondents/SIC and NAICS Codes

Respondents include, but are not limited to, manufacturers of bioremediation agents, 

dispersants, surface collecting agents, surface washing agents and other chemical agents and 

biological additives used as countermeasures against oil spills. Affected private industries can be 

expected to fall within the following industrial classifications:

 Manufacturers of industrial inorganic chemicals (SIC 281/NAICS 325188),

 Manufacturers of industrial organic chemicals (SIC 286/NAICS 325199), and 

 Manufacturers of miscellaneous chemical products (SIC 289/NAICS 325988). 

4(b) Information Requested

(i) Data Items

Under Subpart J, manufacturers who wish to list a product on the Schedule must report

the following data items listed in Exhibit 1. No specific recordkeeping activities are required.
6

EXHIBIT 1

Data Items Required Under NCP Subpart J

RESPONSE FORM ITEMS

RESPONDENT 

ACTIVITY

BURDEN 

HOURS

OIL SPILL MITIGATING AGENT

BA D MA SCA SWA

Name, brand, or trademark, if any, under which the product is sold

Simple 

Information 0 to 0.5

X X X X X

Name, address, and telephone number of the manufacturer, importer or 

vendor X X X X X

Name, address and telephone number of primary distributors or sales outlets X X X X X

Special handling information and worker precautions for storage and field 

application, including maximum and minimum storage temperatures Short Answer 0.5 to 1 X X X X X

Shelf life information Simple 

Information 0 to 0.5 X X X X X

Recommended application procedures, concentrations, and conditions for use Short Answer 0.5 to 1 X X X X X

Results of the effectiveness test set forth in Appendix C of the NCP Narrative Answer 2.0 to 5.0 X X

Result of the toxicity test set forth in Appendix C of the NCP Narrative Answer 2.0 to 5.0 X X X X

Physical properties covered by the American Society for Testing and 

Materials (ASTM) reference standards Short Answer 0.5 to 1 X X X X

Test results for distinguishing surface collecting agents from other chemical 

agents Short Answer 0.5 to 1 X

List of product components Narrative Answer 2.0 to 5.0 X X X X

The concentrations or upper limits of any heavy metals, cyanide, and 

chlorinated hydrocarbons Short Answer 0.5 to 1 X X X X

Information on microbiological cultures, enzyme additives, and nutrient 

additives Narrative Answer 2.0 to 5.0 X X

Identity of laboratory performing tests, the qualifications of the laboratory 

staff, and laboratory experience with similar tests Narrative Answer 2.0 to 5.0 X X X X X

KEY: BA = Bioremediation Agent, D = Dispersant, MA = Miscellaneous Agent, SCA= Surface Collecting Agent, and SWA = Surface Washing Agent
7

(ii) Respondent Activities

Except for effectiveness and toxicity testing, the data items discussed in section 4(b)(i) 

should already be available to respondents through customary business practices (i.e., normal 

research and development activities). Effectiveness and toxicity tests, where applicable, require 

respondents to send products to a laboratory for testing.

Processing, compiling, and reviewing the information required under Subpart J requires 

the following respondent activities:

 Inserting simple information;

 Drafting short answers;

 Drafting narrative answers and preparing backup documentation;

 Secretarial/clerical and technical support; and

 Managerial review.

Under Subpart J, the respondent must also notify EPA of any changes in the composition, 

formulation, or application of the dispersant, surface washing agent, surface collecting agent, 

bioremediation agent, or miscellaneous oil spill control agent. If the change is likely to alter the 

effectiveness or toxicity of the product, EPA may require retesting. If EPA decides that retesting 

is necessary, the respondent must have the product tested in a laboratory and send a summary of 

the results along with the qualifications of the laboratory staff to EPA.

5. Information Collected -- Agency Activities, Collection Methodology, and 

Information Management

5(a) Agency Activities

Under Subpart J, EPA will perform activities when a manufacturer applies to have a 

product listed on the Schedule. Once a manufacturer submits the technical product data required 

by Subpart J, EPA must perform the following activities:

 Receive and process the data;

 Review the data for completeness and procedural accuracy;

 Notify the respondent of the decision on listing the product on the Schedule; and

 If approved, place the product on the Schedule, store the data, and supply the data 

upon request.

EPA’s decision to place a product on the Schedule is based on the completeness of the 

information presented. EPA will not evaluate a submitted product beyond the revised 

effectiveness threshold for the dispersants.

5(b) Collection Methodology and Management

Respondents submit the required data to EPA in hard copy. After review, if the product 

data are accepted by EPA, they are entered electronically on the Schedule. The data are then 

made available to FOSCs through five media: (1) hard copy; (2) EPA Internet Web page; (3) 
8

electronic mail; (4) National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Response 

LINK; and (5) National Response Team (NRT) Selection Guide. The six options ensure that 

FOSCs can obtain the information as efficiently as possible and that the information is useful in 

practice. 

5(c) Small Entity Flexibility

Under Subpart J, small entities must follow the same collection procedures as other 

respondents. FOSCs need the required information to choose products with which they can 

safely and effectively control oil discharges. The establishment of an acceptability criterion for 

dispersant effectiveness and the requirement for effectiveness testing for bioremediation agents 

are not anticipated to result in a significant adverse impact on a substantial number of small 

businesses. 

5(d) Collection Schedule

EPA requires information to be collected whenever a manufacturer wants a product listed 

on the Schedule, or when a product already on the Schedule changes in composition, 

formulation, application, or other product information changes. 

6. Estimating the Burden and Cost of the Collection

6(a) Respondent Burden

This section presents the three-year total burden as well as annual burden for respondents 

for information collection activities under Subpart J. Respondents include manufacturers 

expected to submit products for listing on the Schedule over the three-year period addressed by 

this renewal ICR.

There are 100 manufacturers and 117 products (27 bioremediation agents, 18 dispersants, 

15 miscellaneous oil spill control agents, and 55 surface washing agents, 2 surface collecting 

agents) listed on the March 2016 Schedule.1EPA estimates that manufacturers will apply to list 

11 products on the Schedule each year, including 2 bioremediation agents, 3 dispersants, 2

miscellaneous oil spill control agents, 1 surface collecting agent, and 3 surface washing agents. 

Over a three-year period, EPA anticipates that manufacturers will apply to list a total of 6

bioremediation agents, 9 dispersants, 6 miscellaneous oil spill control agents, 3 surface collecting 

agents, and 9 surface washing agents on the Schedule. 

EPA expects that approximately one-third of the 11 annual product submissions (3-4

products) will be approved by EPA and listed annually on the Schedule. A respondent’s burden 

for preparing a product for listing on the Schedule is the same whether or not EPA lists the 

 

1

117 products were listed on the March 2016 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency National Contingency Plan 

Product Schedule, prepared by U.S. EPA Office of Emergency Management Regulations Implementation Division, 1200 

Pennsylvania Avenue, NW (5104A), Washington, DC 20460 http://www.epa.gov/emergency-response/ncp-productschedule-products-available-use-oil-spills
9

product. Therefore, burden is determined for all manufacturers applying to list a product on the 

Schedule, rather than just for those that receive approval from EPA.

Exhibit 1 provides estimates of the burden (hours) required to respond to each data item 

covered by this ICR. EPA estimates that manufacturers applying to list a new product on the 

Schedule would require approximately 7 to 25 hours of technical labor. The technical labor 

estimate includes the time needed to complete each individual response item required by Subpart 

J, as well as the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, prepare backup 

documentation, and maintain/record the data. The time required depends on the type of 

information requested for a given product. Managerial labor burden for preparing and 

submitting the required technical product data is estimated to be approximately one-fifth of the 

total technical hours per product type. Clerical labor burden for preparing and submitting the 

required technical product data is estimated to be 5 to 10 hours per product. Exhibit 2 

summarizes the estimated burden to respondents for each type of oil spill mitigation agent.

Sorbents are not listed on the Schedule. However, when determining whether to use a 

sorbent, FOSCs may request that sorbent manufacturers submit a written certification2that their 

product meets the definition in Subpart J. The estimated unit burden for sorbent certification is 3 

hours (0.25 managerial, 2.0 technical, and 0.75 clerical). Because sorbents are not listed on the 

Schedule, the small burden of sorbent certification is not shown in Exhibit 2.

EXHIBIT 2

Respondent Burden to Prepare and Submit Information to EPA

Under NCP Subpart J

UNIT BURDEN 

(hours)

OIL SPILL MITIGATING AGENT

Bioremediation 

Agents Dispersants

Miscellaneous

Oil Spill Control

Agents

Surface 

Collecting 

Agents

Surface 

Washing 

Agents 

Managerial Review 1.4 to 3.6 2.0 to 5.0 2.0 to 5.0 1.7 to 4.2 1.6 to 4.0

Technical Support 7.0 to 18.0 10.0 to 25.0 10.0 to 25.0 8.5 to 21.0 8.0 to 20.0

Clerical Support 5 to 10 5 to 10 5 to 10 5 to 10 5 to 10

Total Unit Burden 13.4 to 31.6 17.0 to 40.0 17.0 to 40.0 15.2 to 35.2 14.6 to 34.0

6(b) Estimating Respondent Costs

(i) Estimating Labor Costs

EPA derived the labor wages from the U.S. Department of Labor’s Employment Cost 

Indexes and Levels.3 The wage rates, based on September 2015 (released on December 9, 2015)

 

2

The following model certification statement suffices: “[SORBENT NAME] is a sorbent material and consists 

solely of the materials listed in § 300.917(b)(2) of the NCP.”

3 United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Employer Costs for Employee Compensation, 

Employment Cost Trends, Table 11 -- Private industry workers, by occupational group and full-time and part-time status 

September 2015 (Last Modified December 9, 2015) http://www.bls.gov/news.release/ecec.t11.htm.
10

data, include wages and salaries; benefit costs, including paid leave, supplemental pay, 

insurance, retirement and savings, and legally required benefits; and overhead costs.4 The 

September 2015 wage rates reflect private industry averages, which were estimated by the 

Bureau of Labor Statistics based on a sample survey of 36,900 occupations within 8,600 

establishments in the private sector. EPA applied an overhead rate of 17 percent to hourly 

Employer Costs for Employee Compensation (ECEC) for management, technical, and clerical 

employees. Following are the estimated hourly wage rates used in this analysis: 

 Management -- $79.28 ($67.76 + 17%)

 Technical -- $60.70 ($51.88 + 17%)

 Clerical -- $30.79 ($26.32 + 17%)

(ii) Operating and Maintenance (O&M) Costs for Product Manufacturers 

Laboratory costs are incurred when a respondent must test its product for effectiveness 

and/or toxicity according to the methods outlined in Appendix C of the NCP regulations. 

Although previous ICRs for the NCP Subpart J regulation have shown laboratory-testing costs as 

capital or start-up costs, EPA believes these costs are more appropriately characterized as 

operating and maintenance (O&M) costs. Manufacturers are purchasing services (laboratory

testing), rather than physical capital (e.g. computers, machinery, or equipment). Therefore, 

testing costs are now included as O&M.

In order to provide the necessary test result information to EPA, respondents typically 

have their product tested at a laboratory.

 The dispersant effectiveness test will cost an estimated $2,625 for each product using 

the swirling flask method. A dispersant must exceed the 50-percent (±5 percent) 

threshold in order to be listed on the Schedule. 

 The protocol for effectiveness testing of bioremediation agents under Subpart J is 

estimated to cost $15,750.

 EPA estimates that the toxicity test required for dispersants, miscellaneous oil spill 

control agents, surface collecting agents, and surface washing agents costs $3,675 per 

product.

Respondents are not expected to incur capital/start-up costs for this renewal ICR. The 

unit costs for each respondent to comply with the information collection requirements are 

presented in Exhibit 3. The unit cost is the sum of the labor cost and the non-labor O&M 

laboratory cost. The total unit costs are presented as ranges, reflecting the ranges of burden hour 

estimates.

 

4 Overhead costs were computed separately from BLS data and were assumed to be an additional 17 percent of 

the total wage rate, which is composed of direct wages and salaries and employee benefits, as reported by BLS. 

Adjustments to wage rates for overhead costs are based on the results of several earlier Information Collection Requests 

that adjusted wage rates by an additional 17 percent based on the results of a survey of chemical industries and trade 

associations. (See, for example, Information Collection Request for the Toxic Chemical Release Report for the Proposed 

Lead Rule, EPA ICR #1363.08.) 
11

 EXHIBIT 3

 Respondent Unit Costs for Activities Required Under NCP Subpart Ja

Information Collection Activity

Burden Hours

Total Burden Hours Capital/ 

Startup 

Costs

O&M 

Costs

Management Total Unit Cost Technical Clerical

($79.28/hr) ($60.70/hr) ($30.79/hr)

Low High Low High Low High Low High Low High Average

Manufacturers of Bioremediation Agents

Prepare and Submit Response Form Items 1.4 3.6 7 18 5 10 13.4 31.6 $0 0 $689.86 $1,685.94 $1,187.90 

Conduct Effectiveness Testing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $0 $15,750 $15,750.00 $15,750.00 $15,750.00 

Subtotal - Manufacturers of Bioremediation Agents 1.4 3.6 7 18 5 10 13.4 31.6 $0 $15,750 $16,439.86 $17,435.94 $16,937.90 

Manufacturers of Dispersants

Prepare and Submit Response Form Items 2 5 10 25 5 10 17 40 $0 0 $919.53 $2,221.83 $1,570.68 

Conduct Effectiveness Testing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $0 $2,625 $2,625.00 $2,625.00 $2,625.00 

Conduct Toxicity Testing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $0 $3,675 $3,675.00 $3,675.00 $3,675.00 

Subtotal - Manufacturers of Dispersants 2 5 10 25 5 10 17 40 $0 $6,300 $7,219.53 $8,521.83 $7,870.68 

Manufacturers of Miscellaneous Oil Spill Control Agents

Prepare and Submit Response Form Items 2 5 10 25 5 10 17 40 $0 0 $919.53 $2,221.83 $1,570.68 

Conduct Toxicity Testing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $0 $3,675 $3,675.00 $3,675.00 $3,675.00 

Subtotal - Manufacturers of MOSCAs 2 5 10 25 5 10 17 40 $0 $3,675 $4,594.53 $5,896.83 $5,245.68 

Manufacturers of Surface Collecting Agents

Prepare and Submit Response Form Items 1.7 4.2 8.5 21 5 10 15.2 35.2 $0 0 $804.69 $1,915.61 $1,360.15 

Conduct Toxicity Testing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $0 $3,675 $3,675.00 $3,675.00 $3,675.00 

Subtotal - Manufacturers of Surface Collecting Agents 1.7 4.2 8.5 21 5 10 15.2 35.2 $0 $3,675 $4,479.69 $5,590.61 $5,035.15 

Manufacturers of Surface Washing Agents

Prepare and Submit Response Form Items 1.6 4 8 20 5 10 14.6 34 $0 0 $766.42 $1,839.05 $1,302.73 

Conduct Toxicity Testing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $0 $3,675 $3,675.00 $3,675.00 $3,675.00 

Subtotal - Manufacturers of Surface Washing Agents 1.6 4 8 20 5 10 14.6 34 $0 $3,675 $4,441.42 $5,514.05 $4,977.73 

aThe unit cost for sorbent certification is estimated to be $156.88 per sorbent. The average annual cost is estimated to be $1,568 ($156.88 x 10 sorbent certifications per year.

bExhibit 1 provides a detailed list of burden hours for each response form item included in the analysis.
12

6(c) Estimating Agency Burden and Costs

This section presents the estimated unit burden and unit cost to EPA for maintaining the 

Schedule. Burden estimates are based on EPA’s experience with placing products on the 

Schedule under Subpart J. Exhibit 4 shows the labor burdens to EPA for each activity under 

Subpart J. The agency activities were discussed previously in section 5(a). EPA’s burden is 20 

hours per listing.

Based on the 2016 general pay schedule for the federal government, EPA estimates an

average hourly wage rate of $70.88 for management/technical staff person to maintain the 

Product Schedule.5 To derive the hourly rate Step 1 annual compensation for a GS-13 ($92,145) 

managerial/technical staff person divided by 2,080 (the number of hours in the Federal workyear) and multiplied by the standard government overhead factor (1.6). The adjusted wage rate 

is multiplied by the hours in Exhibit 4 to obtain EPA labor burden cost. The cost of labor per 

application is therefore $1,418.

6

EXHIBIT 4

Estimated Unit Burden and Cost to EPA to Implement NCP Subpart J

INFORMATION COLLECTION ACTIVITY

Burden Hours 

($70.88)

1,2

Cost Per 

Product

Process submitted data 7 $496

Review data for approval 6 $425

Notify respondent of decision 4 $284

Store data 3 $213

UNIT BURDEN 20 $1,418

1 Based on the 2016 general pay schedule for the federal government, EPA estimates an 

average hourly wage and overhead factor rate of $70.88 for management/technical staff to 

maintain the Product Schedule.

2EPA assumes burden hours for each information collection activity will be the same for 

each oil spill mitigation agent type.

The annual costs to EPA under Subpart J are presented in Exhibit 5. As mentioned 

previously, it is estimated that, under Subpart J, applications are expected to be received for 2

bioremediation agents, 3 dispersants, 2 miscellaneous oil spill control agents, 1 surface collecting 

agent, and 3 surface washing agents per year over the course of the three-year renewal ICR 

period.

 

5 U.S. Office of Personnel Management. 2016 General Schedule – DCB: Effective January 2016. 

(htpps://www.opm.gov/policy-data-oversight/pay-leave/salaries-tables/pdf/2016/DCB.pdf)

6 The cost is calculated by multiplying 20 burden hours by the average hourly GS Rate (Grade 13 Step 1 rate of 

$70.88)
13

EXHIBIT 5

Estimated Annual Burden and Cost to EPA to Implement NCP Subpart J

Oil Spill Mitigation Agent

Burden 

Hours

Cost Per 

Product

Number of 

Products 

(including 

Sorbents) Per 

Year

Total 

Annual 

Burden 

Hours

Total 

Annual 

Cost

Bioremediation Agents 20 $1,418 2 40 $2,836

Dispersants 20 $1,418 3 60 $4,254 

Miscellaneous Oil Spill 

Control Agents 20

$1,418 2 40 $2,836 

Surface Collecting Agents 20 $1,418 1 20 $1,418

Surface Washing Agents 20 $1,418 3 60 $4,254 

Sorbent Reviews and 

Certification 3 $212.64 10 30 $2,126

 TOTAL 21 250 $17,724

6(d) Estimating the Respondent Universe and Total Burden and Costs

(i) Estimated Total Annual Burden and Costs for All Respondents

The section presents the average annual burden and costs for all respondents. The 

number of responses expected annually over the three-year renewal ICR period has been 

estimated based on the average rate of applications for listing on the Schedule over the last three 

years. It is estimated that manufacturers will apply to list 2 bioremediation agents, 3 dispersants, 

2 miscellaneous oil spill control agents, 1 surface collecting agent, and 3 surface washing agents 

each year of the renewal ICR period. Sorbent review and certification of 10 products a year is 

also part of the EPA burden. Consequently EPA estimates that manufacturers will apply to list an 

average of 11 total chemical countermeasure products and 10 sorbent for review and certification

will occur each year of the ICR period.

The average annual burden is arrived at by multiplying the average unit burden (the 

midpoint of the range) by the estimated frequency of responses per year for each oil spill 

mitigating agent type, as shown in Exhibit 6.

Based on the average annual burdens shown in Exhibit 6, the total average annual burden 

under Subpart J will be approximately 285 hours for all 11 respondents. However, it is also 

expected that 10 sorbent manufacturers per year will have to certify the composition of their 
14

product at an annual burden of 30 hours. Therefore the total annual burden to manufacturers 

under Subpart J will be approximately 315 hours. 

As shown in Exhibit 6, the total annual cost under Subpart J will be $87.947.55 for all 11

respondents listing an oil spill mitigation product on the Schedule. However, this value also 

includes the expectation that 10 sorbent manufacturers per year will be have to certify the

composition of their product, at an annual cost of $1,568 (10 products x $156.88 per product). 

Therefore, the total annual cost to all manufactures under Subpart J will be $89.590.69.

(ii) Estimated Total Annual Burden and Cost to EPA

The annual burden and costs to EPA under Subpart J are presented at the bottom of the 

tables in Exhibits 4 and 5, respectively. The annual agency burden is determined by multiplying 

the unit agency burden by the expected frequency of applications. For example, it is estimated 

that the average request to list a dispersant would require 20 hours of EPA staff time under 

Subpart J (as shown in Exhibit 4). It is also estimated that EPA would process 4 applications for 

dispersants each year, as mentioned above. Therefore, the annual burden to EPA for dispersants 

under Subpart J would be approximately 60 hours (20 hours/application x 3 applications). The 

total annual burden to EPA under Subpart J will be approximately 220 hours (20 

hours/application x 11 applications). The number of future responses has been estimated based 

on the average rate of applications for listing on the Schedule over the last three years. As 

mentioned previously, it is estimated that applications will be received for 2 bioremediation 

agents, 3 dispersants, 2 miscellaneous oil spill control agents, 1 surface collecting agent, and 3 

surface washing agents each year of the renewal ICR period.

The annual cost to EPA, as shown in Exhibit 5, is determined by multiplying the unit cost 

by the frequency of response. For example, it is estimated that the annual cost for listing 

dispersants will be $1,418 per application x 3 dispersants per year). The total annual cost to 

EPA under Subpart J will be $4,254 for dispersants. Sorbent review and certification of 10 

products a year at 30 hours a year are also part of the EPA burden. The total cost for 21 hours of 

burden per year to EPA is $17,724. 
15

EXHIBIT 6

Estimated Total Average Annual Burden and Costs for All Respondents

Information Collection Activity

Per Product Costs

Number 

of 

Products 

Annually

Total 

Average 

Annual 

Burden 

Hours

Total 

Average 

Labor 

Costs

Total 

O&M 

Costs

Total 

Average 

Annual 

Costs

Average Burden Hours Total 

Average 

Burden 

Hours

Total 

Average 

Labor 

Cost

Capital/

Startup 

Costs

O&M 

Costs

Total 

Average 

Costs

Management Technical Clerical

($79.28/hr) ($60.70/hr) ($30.79/hr)

Manufacturers of Bioremediation Agents

Prepare and Submit Response Form Items 2.5 12.5 7.5 22.5 $1,187.90 $0 $0 $1,187.90 2 45.0 $2,375.80 $0 $2,375.80

Conduct Effectiveness Testing 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $15,750 $15,750.00 2 0.0 $0.00 $31,500 $31,500.00

Subtotal - Manufacturers of Bioremediation Agents 2.5 12.5 7.5 22.5 $1,187.90 $0 $15,750 $16,937.90 2 45.0 $2,375.80 $31,500 $33,875.80

Manufacturers of Dispersants

Prepare and Submit Response Form Items 3.5 17.5 7.5 28.5 $1,570.68 $0 $0 $1,570.68 3 85.50 $4,712.03 $0 $4,712.03

Conduct Effectiveness Testing 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $2,625 $2,625.00 3 0.00 $0.00 $7,875 $7,875.00

Conduct Toxicity Testing 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $3,675 $3,675.00 3 0.00 $0.00 $11,025 $11,025.00

Subtotal - Manufacturers of Dispersants 3.5 17.5 7.5 28.5 $1,570.68 $0 $6,300 $7,870.68 3 85.50 $4,712.03 $18,900 $23,612.03

Manufacturers of Miscellaneous Oil Spill Control Agents

Prepare and Submit Response Form Items 3.5 17.5 7.5 28.5 $1,570.68 $0 $0 $1,570.68 2 57.00 $3,141.36 $0 $3,141.36

Conduct Toxicity Testing 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $3,675 $3,675.00 2 0.00 $0.00 $7,350 $7,350.00

Subtotal - Manufacturers of MOSCAs 3.5 17.5 7.5 28.5 $1,570.68 $0 $3,675 $5,245.68 2 57.00 $3,141.36 $7,350 $10,491.36

Manufacturers of Surface Collecting Agents

Prepare and Submit Response Form Items 2.95 14.75 7.5 25.2 $1,360.15 $0 $0 $1,360.15 1 25.2 $1,360 $0 $1,360

Conduct Toxicity Testing 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $3,675 $3,675.00 1 0 $0 $3,675 $3,675

Subtotal - Manufacturers of Surface Collecting Agents 2.95 14.75 7.5 25.2 $1,360.15 $0 $3,675 $5,035.15 1 25.2 $1,360 $3,675 $5,035

Manufacturers of Surface Washing Agents

Prepare and Submit Response Form Items 2.8 14 7.5 24.3 $1,302.73 $0 $0 $1,302.73 3 72.9 $3,908.20 $0 $3,908.20

Conduct Toxicity Testing 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $3,675 $3,675.00 3 0 $0.00 $11,025 $11,025.00

Subtotal - Manufacturers of Surface Washing Agents 2.8 14 7.5 24.3 $1,302.73 $0 $3,675 $4,977.73 3 72.9 $3,908.20 $11,025 $14,933.20

Subtotal - Oil Spill Mitigation Agents 15.25 76.25 37.5 129 $6,992.14 $0 $33,075 $40,067 11 285.6 $15,497.55 $72,450 $87,947.55

Sorbent Review and Certification 0.25 2 0.75 3

$164.31 $0 $0 $164.31 10 30 $1,643.15 $0 $1,643.15

Total 15.5 78.25 38.25 132 $7,156.46 $40,231 21 315.6 $17,140.69 $72,450 $89,590.69
16

6(e) Bottom Line Burden Hours and Costs

The total annual burden and costs for each of the three years of the renewal ICR period 

are illustrated in Exhibit 6. The labor cost represents the average hourly burden weighted by the 

appropriate wage category (management, technical, or clerical). O&M costs vary depending on 

product type and the test(s) required. For the renewal ICR period, the burden hours for 

respondents are 945 hours (315 + 315 + 315). Based on Exhibit 6, the annual O&M costs for 

respondents are [($15,750)(2 bioremediation agents/year) + ($2,625 + $3,675)(3

dispersants/year) + ($3,675)(2 miscellaneous oil spill control agents/year) + ($3,675)(1 surface 

collecting agent/year) + ($3,675)(3 surface washing agents/year)]. Therefore the total O&M 

costs for respondents for the three-year renewal ICR period are $217,350.

The annual respondent labor cost for oil spill mitigating agents and substances excluding 

sorbents is $17,140.69, which is based on Exhibit 3 and the following equation:

([{1,187.90}/2] x 2/year) + ([{$1,570.67}/2] x 3/year) + ([{$1,570.67}/2] x 2/year) + 

([{1,360.15}/2] x 1/year) + ([{$1,302.73}/2] x 3/year) = $6,992.12

The annual respondent labor cost of sorbent is $1,568 ($156.88 x 10 respondents). 

Therefore, the total annual labor cost for respondents is $ 16,293, and the total labor costs for 

respondents for the three-year ICR period will be $51,423 ($17,141 x 3 years). Accordingly, the 

bottom line cost for respondents for the three-year renewal ICR period is $268,770 ($217,350 + 

$ 51,423) as shown in Exhibit 7. There is no capital/start-up costs associated with this renewal 

ICR.

EXHIBIT 7

Total Burden and Cost Estimates under Subpart J

Year

RESPONDENTS EPA

Burden 

(hours) Labor Costs O&M Costs Total Costs

Burden 

(hours)

Labor 

Costs

Total 

Costs

Year 1 315 $17,141 $72,450 $89.590 250 $17,724 $17,724

Year 2 315 $17,141 $72,450 $89.590 250 $17,724 $17,724

Year 3 315 $17,141 $72,450 $89.590 250 $17,724 $17,724

Totala945 $51,423 $217,350 $268,770 750 $53,172 $53,172

As shown in Exhibit 7, the Subpart J annual burden for EPA is 250 hours. Therefore, the 

total burden hours for EPA during the three-year renewal ICR period are 750. The total annual 

labor costs for EPA are $17,724, and the total labor costs for EPA over the three-year renewal 

ICR period are $53,172 ($17,724 x 3 years).

6(f) Reasons for the Change in Burden

EPA does not anticipate any changes in the annual burden hours or O&M costs under this 

ICR renewal (see Exhibit 8). The modifications made to figures in this ICR supporting statement 
17

involve updates to the wage rates associated with respondent and EPA personnel activities. The 

dispersant verification test cost ($1,200) per dispersant was included in the 2013 ICR but has 

been removed from the 2016 ICR. Verification testing is not conducted by EPA labs. Labor 

costs are not reported in the OMB inventory.

EXHIBIT 8

Estimated Annualized Burden and Costs Comparison

Annualized Burden 

Hours

Annualized O&M Costs

(rounded)

Current OMB Inventory Burden 315 $72,450 

Change in Burden

Adjustment

Program Change

0

0

0

0

0

0

ICR Renewal Burden 315 $72,450

6(g) Burden Statement

The collection of information required to prepare and submit material for listing a 

product on NCP Product Schedule is estimated to have a public reporting burden of 13 to 40 

hours per response in the first year and subsequent years, depending on the type of product to be 

listed with an average of 26 hours per response. Written certification for sorbents is estimated to 

have a public reporting burden of 3 hours per product. There is no required recordkeeping 

burden associated with listing a product on the NCP Product Schedule. 

Burden means the total time, effort, or financial resources expended by persons to 

generate, maintain, retain, or disclose or provide information to or for a Federal agency. This 

includes the time needed to review instructions; develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology

and systems for the purposes of collecting, validating, and verifying information, processing and 

maintaining information, and disclosing and providing information; adjust the existing ways to 

comply with any previously applicable instructions and requirements; train personnel to be able 

to respond to a collection of information; search data sources; complete and review the collection 

of information; and transmit or otherwise disclose the information. An agency may not conduct 

or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it 

displays a currently valid OMB control number. The OMB control numbers for EPA regulations 

are listed in 40 CFR part 9 and 48 CFR chapter 15. 

To comment on the Agency's need for this information, the accuracy of the provided 

burden estimates, and any suggested methods for minimizing respondent burden, including the 

use of automated collection techniques, EPA has established a public docket for this ICR under 

Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-OPA-2007-0042, which is available for online viewing at 

www.regulations.gov, or in person viewing at the Superfund Docket in the EPA Docket Center 

(EPA/DC), EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, D.C. The 

EPA Docket Center Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through 
18

Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Reading Room is (202) 566-

1744, and the telephone number for the Superfund Docket is (202) 566-0276. An electronic 

version of the public docket is available at www.regulations.gov. This site can be used to submit 

or view public comments, access the index listing of the contents of the public docket, and to 

access those documents in the public docket that are available electronically. When in the 

system, select “search,” then key in the Docket ID Number identified above. Also, you can send 

comments to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and 

Budget, 725 17th Street, NW, Washington, D.C. 20503, Attention: Desk Officer for EPA. Please 

include the EPA Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-OPA-2007-0042 and OMB Control Number 

2050-0141 in any correspondence.