alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-4.19







 Exhibit 4.19 

AMENDMENT NO. 1 
 TO

 FULL TRUCK ALLIANCE CO. LTD. 

2021 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN 

This Amendment (“Amendment”), dated as of November 11, 2021, is made by Full Truck Alliance Co. Ltd. (the
“Company”) to the Full Truck Alliance Co. Ltd. 2021 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”). 
 WHEREAS,
the Company maintains the Plan to attract and retain the services of employees, directors and consultants considered essential to the success of the Company; 

WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 16(b) of the Plan, the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”) may amend any
provision of the Plan at any time (subject to requirements under applicable laws); and 
 WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the
Plan to (i) permit the issuance of Class B ordinary shares of the Company, par value US$0.00001 per share, in settlement of Awards (as defined in the Plan) and (ii) reserve the authority to act as the administrator with respect to
such Awards to the Board. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, the Company hereby amends the Plan as follows: 

1. Amendment to Section 2(a). Section 2(a) of the Plan shall, as of the date of this Amendment, be amended by deleting the
definitions for “Administrator” and “Share” in their entirety and replacing them with the following new definitions: 

“Administrator” means the Committee or in the absence of such Committee, the Board; provided, that
(i), as applied to determinations related to Awards granted to the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, the Board, or a committee thereof, shall be the Administrator and (ii) as applied to determinations related to Awards that contemplate
the issuance of any Class B ordinary share of Company, par value US$0.00001 per share, the Board shall be the Administrator. 

“Share” means (i) a Class A ordinary share of the Company, par value US$0.00001 per share, or
(ii) a Class B ordinary share of the Company, par value US$0.00001 per share, in each case as adjusted in accordance with Section 14 below. 

2. Governing Law. This Amendment shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the Cayman Islands. 

3. Incorporation. This Amendment shall be and is hereby incorporated in and forms a part of the Plan. 

4. Ratification. All other provisions of the Plan remain unchanged and are hereby ratified by the Company.
# C_2016200EN.01000402.xml

| 6.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 200/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 200/4

---

Order of the Court of 17 March 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de Primera Instancia No 5 de Alcobendas — Spain) — Ibercaja Banco SAU v José Cortés González

(Case C-613/15) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Directive 93/13/EEC - Unfair terms in consumer contracts - Mortgage loans - Term relating to default interest - Early repayment term - Power of the national court - Time limit))

(2016/C 200/06)

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Referring court

Juzgado de Primera Instancia No 5 de Alcobendas (Spain)

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Ibercaja Banco SAU

Applicant:

Defendant: José Cortés González

Defendant:

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 2003 on unfair terms in consumer contracts must be interpreted as meaning that:

| — | Article 3(1) and Article 4(1) thereof do not permit the law of a Member State to restrict the discretion of a national court in respect of a finding of unfair terms in a mortgage contract concluded between a consumer and a professional, and |
| --- | --- |

—

Article 3(1) and Article 4(1) thereof do not permit the law of a Member State to restrict the discretion of a national court in respect of a finding of unfair terms in a mortgage contract concluded between a consumer and a professional, and

| — | Article 6(1) and Article 7(1) thereof require that national law may not prevent that court from setting aside such a term if it were found to be ‘unfair’, within the meaning of Article 3(1) of that directive. |
| --- | --- |

—

Article 6(1) and Article 7(1) thereof require that national law may not prevent that court from setting aside such a term if it were found to be ‘unfair’, within the meaning of Article 3(1) of that directive.

---

(1)  OJ C 48, 8.2.2016.

1

---
|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  February 3, 2010 | /s/ CHRISTOPHER J. EPERJESY                                           |
|-----------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                              | Christopher J. Eperjesy                                               |
|                              | Vice President – Finance, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |

----
**EXHIBIT32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to**

** Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

I, Frederick M. Strader, as President and Chief Executive Officer ofUnited Industrial Corporation (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to myknowledge:

 

a.               theaccompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30,2005 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”)fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

b.              theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Date: August 5,  2005 |
|----------------------------|
|                       |
|                       |
| /s/ Frederick M. Strader   |   |
| Frederick M. Strader       |
| Chief Executive Officer    |

 

----
AO 450 (Rev. 5/85) Judgment in a Civil Case

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

Eastern Division 

EDUCATIONAL CREDIT

MANAGEMENT CORPORATION,

Plaintiff,

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE

v.

THE HIGHER PEAKS LEARNING CASE NO. 2:12-CV-00015

ACADEMY, INC., JUDGE EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR.

MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARK R. ABEL

Defendant.

Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues have

been tried and the jury has rendered its verdict.

Decision by Court. A decision has been rendered by the Court without a hearing or trial.

Pursuant to the Order filed January 4, 2013, JUDGMENT is hereby entered

DISMISSING this case.

Date: January 4, 2013 JOHN P. HEHMAN, CLERK

/S/ Andy F. Quisumbing 

(By) Andy F. Quisumbing

 Courtroom Deputy Clerk

Case: 2:12-cv-00015-EAS-MRA Doc #: 21 Filed: 01/04/13 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
# C_2021465EN.01000101.xml

| 17.11.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 465/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.11.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 465/1

---

EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

2020-2021 SESSION

Sittings of 8 to 11 February 2021

TEXTS ADOPTED

---