alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the 
Company's Balance Sheet as of September 30, 1996 and the Statement Of Income
for the period ended September 30, 1996, and is qualified in its entirety by 
reference to such financial statements.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          84,124
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,533,478<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,617,602
<PP&E>                                       7,995,908
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,878,473
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,763,747<F2>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           84,065<F3>
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     835,997 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,763,747<F4>
<SALES>                                      2,460,345<F5>
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,460,345
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               216,720<F6>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             202,400
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,041,225
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,041,225
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,041,225
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 2,835.03<F7>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 2,835.03<F7>
<FN>
<F1>Rent receivable from Fisk Building Associates
<F2>Includes unamortized mortgage refinancing costs
<F3>Accrued interest payable, first mortgage principal payments 
    due within one year and accrued supervisory services
<F4>Includes long-term debt 
<F5>Rental income includes basic rent, advance of primary overage rent 
    and secondary overage rent
<F6>Supervisory services and amortization of mortgage refinance costs
<F7>Earnings per $5,000 participation unit, based on 720 participation units
    outstanding during the period
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1



      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
                TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



              In connection with the Quarterly Report of Thomas  Industries Inc.
         (the  "Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period  ending June 30, 2004, as
         filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof
         (the  "Report"),  the  undersigned  Chief  Executive  Officer and Chief
         Financial Officer of the Company hereby certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
         Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
         Act of 2002 that based on their knowledge (1) the Report fully complies
         with the  requirements  of  Section  13(a) or 15 (d) of the  Securities
         Exchange Act of 1934, and (2) the  information  contained in the Report
         fairly represents,  in all material respects,  the financial  condition
         and  results of  operations  of the  Company as of and for the  periods
         covered in the Report.



         /s/ Timothy C. Brown
         ----------------------------------------
         Timothy C. Brown, Chief Executive Officer


         /s/ Phillip J. Stuecker
         ----------------------------------------
         Phillip J. Stuecker, Chief Financial Officer



         August 9, 2004



A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Thomas Industries Inc. and will be
retained by Thomas  Industries Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

The foregoing  certification  is being  furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission as an exhibit to the Form 10-Q and shall not be  considered  filed as
part of the Form 10-Q.


                                       24
*This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of

law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3. 

## F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### JAN 30 1998 

### PATRICK FISHER Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. JAMES BARNES, Defendant-Appellant. No. 97-5080 (D.C. No. 96-CV-198-C) (N.D. Okla.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Before SEYMOUR , Chief Judge, BRORBY , and BRISCOE , Circuit Judges.
After examining the briefs and appellate record, th is panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materiallyassist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. There fore, the case is ordered submitted without oral argument. Defendant James Barnes appeals the order of the dis trict court denying his motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentenc e under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. He1 Because Barnes filed his § 2255 motion on March 13, 1996, before the effective

date of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, he is not required to obtain a certificate of appealability. SeeUnited States v. Kunzman , 125 F.3d 1363, 1364 n.2 (10th Cir. 1997). -2- contends he received ineffective assistance of coun sel in his trial for conspiracy to manufacture, possess, and distribute methamphetamine. We affirm. 1 On appeal, Barnes contends counsel was ineffective because “counsel did not plan a defense, plan an attack, did not do any discovery, failed totally with hearsay evidence, did not make objections when nece ssary, and thereby totally failed to give James Barnes proper defense in a cou rt of law.” Barnes did not raise the issue of ineffective assis tance of trial counsel in his § 2255 proceedings before the district court. He contended he received ineffective assistance of counsel at sentencing. H e argued before the district court that both trial and appellate counsel were in effective in failing to object to the sentencing’s court’s application of the offense level for D-methamphetamine rather than L-methamphetamine. In the absence of e xtraordinary circumstances, this court will not review issues raised for the fi rst time on appeal. Smith v. Secretary of New Mexico Dept. of Corrections , 50 F.3d 801, 814 n.22 (10th Cir. 1995). There are no extraordinary circumstances he re to justify departure from the general rule. Moreover, the record does not in clude the trial transcript and other portions of the trial record. We cannot addr ess issues when the record is-3-

insufficient for meaningful review. See Strand v. United States , 780 F.2d 1497, 1500 (10th Cir. 1985). Barnes is granted a certificate of probable cause. The district court’s denial of Barnes’ § 2255 motion is AFFIRMED. The mandate shall issue forthwith. Entered for the Court Mary Beck Briscoe Circuit Judge
# C_2016350EN.01001301.xml

| 26.9.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 350/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.9.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 350/13

---

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 28 July 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Berlin — Germany) — Vattenfall Europe Generation AG v Bundesrepublik Deutschland

(Case C-457/15) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the European Union - Directive 2003/87/EC - Temporal scope - Time when the emissions trading obligation arises - Article 3 - Annexe I - Concept of ‘installation’ - Combustion of fuels in installations with a total rated thermal input exceeding 20 MW))

(2016/C 350/16)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Verwaltungsgericht Berlin

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Vattenfall Europe Generation AG

Applicant:

Defendant: Bundesrepublik Deutschland

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

In so far as Annex I to Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 2003 establishing a scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community and amending Council Directive 96/61/EC, as amended by Directive 2009/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 includes the ‘combustion of fuels in installations with a total rated thermal input exceeding 20 MW’ in the list of categories of activities to which that directive applies, it must be interpreted as meaning that the emissions trading obligation of an installation for the generation of electricity starts on the date of the first emissions of greenhouse gases, and thus potentially before the date of the first generation of electricity.

---

(1)  OJ C 398, 30.11.2015.

1

---
EXHIBIT 32.1









CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, John C. Lawrence, President, and Chief Executive Officer of United States Antimony Corporation (the "Company") do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:





This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/ John C. Lawrence
August 13, 2010John C. Lawrence,

President and Chief Executive Officer
# C_2015398EN.01002501.xml

| 30.11.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 398/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.11.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 398/25

---

Order of the President of the Court of 14 September 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Centrale Raad van Beroep — Netherlands) — Korpschef van politie v W.F. de Munk

(Case C-209/15) (1)

1

(2015/C 398/35)

Language of the case: Dutch

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 254, 3.8.2015.

1

---
(a)  A review of Toyota Motor Credit Corporation’s activities and of its performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of March 2, 2016 (the “Sale and Servicing Agreement”), among Toyota Auto Finance Receivables LLC, as seller, Toyota Motor Credit Corporation, as servicer (in such capacity, the “Servicer”) and sponsor, and Toyota Auto Receivables 2016-A Owner Trust, as issuer, during the year ended December 31, 2017 has been made under my supervision.
 
 (b)  To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the aforementioned period.
 
  
 /s/ Wei Shi
# C_2015254EN.01000701.xml

| 3.8.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 254/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.8.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 254/7

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal Administrativo (Portugal) lodged on 11 May 2015 — Município de Vila Pouca de Aguiar v Sá Machado & Filhos SA, Norcep, Construções e Empreendimentos, Lda

(Case C-214/15)

(2015/C 254/09)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Referring court

Referring court

Supremo Tribunal Administrativo

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Município de Vila Pouca de Aguiar

Applicant:

Defendants: Sá Machado & Filhos SA, Norcep, Construções e Empreendimentos, Lda

Defendants:

Question referred

Question referred

In relation to a procedure for the award of a public works contract, does EU law, in particular Article 55 of Directive 2004/18/EC (1), permit the immediate exclusion of a tender that, when it is submitted, is not supported by a document justifying its ‘abnormally low price’, in a situation in which the contract documents fix the criterion for that requirement to be met [point 09/C1 of the ‘contract documents’]?

1

---

(1)  Directive 2004/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts

1

OJ 2004 L 134, p. 114.

---
Before the Third Division,

April 5, 1951

No. 55441.

#### Tropical Hobbyland *v.*United States,

protest 168748-K (Tampa).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of live birds similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Alfred Mazer*v. *United States*(25 Cust. Ct. 67, C. D. 1265), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
April 29, 2010 

MEMORANDUM 

SUBJECT: Notice of Proposed Rulemaking: Pre-OMB Review 

FROM: Marc Thomas 

Office of Resource Conservation and Recovery 

TO: Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-RCRA-2008-0329 

The attached document is a copy of the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking –Identification of 

Nonhazardous Secondary Materials That Are Solid Waste, which was originally sent to the 

Office of Management and Budget (OMB) on March 18, 2010. 

Attachment
AO 450 (Rev. 5/85) Judgment in a Civil Case

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

Eastern Division 

GREGORY RICHARDS,

Plaintiff,

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE

v.

CASE NO. 2:12-CV-846

RODERICK J. MCDAVIS, et al., JUDGE EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR.

MAGISTRATE JUDGE NORAH MCCANN KING

Defendants.

Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues have

been tried and the jury has rendered its verdict.

Decision by Court. A decision has been rendered by the Court without a hearing or trial.

Pursuant to the Opinion and Order filed September 19, 2013, JUDGMENT is

hereby entered DISMISSING this action.

Date: September 19, 2013 JOHN P. HEHMAN, CLERK

/S/ Andy F. Quisumbing 

(By) Andy F. Quisumbing

 Courtroom Deputy Clerk

Case: 2:12-cv-00846-EAS-NMK Doc #: 34 Filed: 09/19/13 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
No. 64347.

protests 266909-K and 268925-K (New York).

#### Shaygen Vacuum Cleaner Distributors, Inc. *v.*United States,

*521Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of electrical floor polishers similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Electrolux Corporation*(46 C.C.P.A. 143, C.A.D. 718), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
# Official Journal C 74A/31 M

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 74A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5031 March 2007 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 74A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5031 March 2007

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | Commission |
| 2007/C 074A/01 | Vacancy notice for the position of Director of the European Union agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) Vienna | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

Commission

2007/C 074A/01

Vacancy notice for the position of Director of the European Union agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) Vienna

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
June 2, 2015 

Mr. Nathan Progar 

EarthRes, Inc. 

6912 Old Easton Road 

Pipersville, PA 18947 

Dear Mr. Progar: 

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It 

explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days. 

Why We Can Not Process Your Request 

We entered your May 6, 2015, exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA-2015-

1461), but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does 

not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request 

any further, you must send us all of the following: 

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole. 

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption. 

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request. 

What You Should Do 

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 
2 

If We Do Not Hear From You 

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Brenda Robeson 

Program Analyst, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division 

Enclosure
Order issued July 28, 2014

S

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

________________________________________

No. 05-13-01591-CR

No. 05-13-01592-CR

________________________________________

JOHN ELLSWORTH BLACK, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

O R D E R

Before Justices Lang, Myers, and Brown

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we GRANT the April 9, 2014 motion of Niles 

Illich for leave to withdraw as appointed counsel on appeal. We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court 

to remove Niles Illich as counsel of record for appellant. We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to 

send a copy of this order and all future correspondence to John Ellsworth Black, TDCJ No.

1891896, Byrd Unit, 21 FM 247, Huntsville, Texas, 77320.

/Lana Myers/

LANA MYERS

JUSTICE
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Commercial Mortgage  Servicing**D1050-084, 8th Fl  401 South Tryon Street  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|--------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

Reference is hereby made tothat certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of May 1, 2016, by andamong CCRE COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES, L.P., as Depositor, WELLS FARGOBANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, RIALTO CAPITAL ADVISORS, LLC, asSpecial Servicer, U.S.BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, CertificateAdministrator and Paying Agent, U.S.BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION , AS Custodian,PARK BRIDGE LENDER SERVICES LLC, as Operating Advisor AND Asset RepresentationsReviewer with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, CFCRE2016-C4 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein nototherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 10.11 ofthis Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of CommercialMortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1.  A review of theactivities of the Master Servicer during the period from May 1, 2016 throughDecember 31, 2016 (the “Reporting Period”),  and of itsperformance per the Agreement during such period has been made under mysupervision, and 

 

2.  To the best of myknowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of itsobligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, theundersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day ofFebruary 2017.

 

 

/s/ Daniel Bober

Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President 

Wells Fargo Bank

 

 

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll  go far |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------|
```

[Federal Register: January 15, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 10)]
[Notices]               
[Page 2581-2582]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr15ja10-97]                         

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

 
Twelfth Meeting: RTCA Special Committee 216/Aeronautical Systems 
Security

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

[[Page 2582]]


ACTION: Notice of RTCA Special Committee 216 meeting; Aeronautical 
Systems Security.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of a 
meeting of RTCA Special Committee 216: Aeronautical Systems Security.

DATES: The meeting will be held February 9-11, 2010 from 9 a.m. to 5 
p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at RTCA, Inc., 1828 L Street, NW., 
Suite 805, Washington, DC 20036.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: RTCA Secretariat, 1828 L Street, NW., 
Suite 805, Washington, DC, 20036; telephone (202) 833-9339; fax (202) 
833-9434; Web site http://www.rtca.org.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a) (2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice 
is hereby given for a Special Committee 216/Aeronautical Systems 
Security meeting. The agenda will include:
     Welcome/Introductions/Administrative Remarks.
     Agenda Overview and Approval of the Summary of the 11th 
meeting held November 18-20, 2009, (RTCA Paper No. 257-09/SC216-023).
     EUROCAE WG-72 Report.
     Subgroup and Action Item Reports:
      SOW reviews;
      Schedule.
     Subgroup Meetings/Break-outs.
     Subgroup Reports on Break-outs.
     Establish Dates, Location, and Agenda for Next Meeting(s).
     Any Other Business.
    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairmen, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in 
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may 
present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on January 7, 2010.
Francisco Estrada C.,
RTCA Advisory Committee.
[FR Doc. 2010-660 Filed 1-14-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
SEVEYON VALTIA PORTER, JR.

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 14

- 1887

________________________ _

____/

Opinion filed February 3, 2015.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County

. Ross Goodman , Judge

.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public Defender,

Tallahassee , for Appellant.

Pame la Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Jessica DaSilva and Jay Kubica, Assistant Attorney s General, Tallah a ssee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

THOMAS

, ROWE

, and OSTERHAUS

, J J

. , CONCUR.