alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-7821
In Re: CYRUS JONATHAN GEORGE, Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CA-90-78) Submitted: January 16, 2003 Decided: January 27, 2003 Before WILLIAMS, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Cyrus Jonathan George, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Cyrus Jonathan George petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his motion to alter or amend the judgment in his criminal case. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Although we find that mandamus relief is not warranted because the delay is not unreasonable, we deny the mandamus petition without prejudice to the filing of another mandamus petition if the district court does not act expeditiously. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                           UT
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1996
<BOOK-VALUE>                                   PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      1,327,045
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                    34,368
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         190,804
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                       439,105
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,991,322
<COMMON>                                       284,579
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      (1,410)
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            166,463
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 449,632
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    4,461
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           780,598
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                             0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                      0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                 0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                  95,171
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                      0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                    17,274
<LEASES-CURRENT>                               309
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 643,877
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  1,991,322
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      548,817
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                           43,722
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     415,716
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     459,438
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        89,379
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                             4,479
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 93,858
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       51,741
<NET-INCOME>                                   38,508
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                    279
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                  40,069
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                       30,458
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                      64,997
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         111,299
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  2.84
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  2.84
        


</TABLE>
-86 -84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72

36 38 40 42 44



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 2000 500 18 12 06 00 08/17 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 17 Aug 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 39.41 N 76.30 WMeters AGL
# C_2015146EN.01003002.xml

| 4.5.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 146/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.5.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 146/30

---

Action brought on 6 March 2015 — European Parliament v Council of the European Union

(Case C-116/15)

(2015/C 146/37)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Parliament (represented by: F. Drexler, A. Caiola, M. Pencheva, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | join the present case with the case registered under number C-14/15 for the purposes of the written or oral part of the procedure or of the judgment; |
| --- | --- |

—

join the present case with the case registered under number C-14/15 for the purposes of the written or oral part of the procedure or of the judgment;

| — | annul Council Decision 2014/911/EU of 4 December 2014 on the launch of automated data exchange with regard to dactyloscopic data in Latvia (1); |
| --- | --- |

—

annul Council Decision 2014/911/EU of 4 December 2014 on the launch of automated data exchange with regard to dactyloscopic data in Latvia (1);

1

| — | order Council of the European Union to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order Council of the European Union to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The European Parliament invokes two pleas in law in support of its action based on Article 263 TFEU.

By its first plea in law, the Parliament claims that the Council used an incorrect legal basis in order to adopt Decision 2014/911/EU. In the context of that first plea in law, the Parliament puts forward two limbs of reasoning. The Parliament claims in particular that the Council should have found a legal basis for the contested decision amongst the provisions of the TFEU and that, in any event, the Council relied on an unlawful provision for the adoption of Decision 2014/911/EU. It used a derived legal basis, which, as such, is unlawful, in accordance with the Court’s case-law. Under that plea, the Parliament raises a plea of illegality relating to Article 25(2) of Decision 2008/615/JHA (2).

2

By its second plea in law, the Parliament complains that the Council used an incorrect decisional procedure in order to adopt that decision. The Parliament thus derives therefrom an infringement of the Treaties and an infringement of an essential procedural requirement.

---

(1)  OJ 2014 L 360, p. 28.

1

(2)  OJ 2008 L 210, p. 1.

2

---
# C_2017202EN.01000202.xml

| 26.6.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.6.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/2

---

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 27 April 2017 — Akzo Nobel NV, Akzo Nobel Chemicals GmbH, Akzo Nobel Chemicals BV v Akcros Chemicals Ltd, European Commission

(Case C-516/15 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - European markets in tin stabilisers and in ESBO/esters heat stabilisers - Price fixing, market allocation and exchange of commercially sensitive information - Whether the unlawful conduct of the subsidiaries may be attributed to the parent company - Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 - Article 25(1) - Limitation period for the imposition of penalties on subsidiaries - Effects on the legal position of the parent company))

(2017/C 202/03)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Appellants: Akzo Nobel NV, Akzo Nobel Chemicals GmbH, Akzo Nobel Chemicals BV (represented by: C. Swaak and R. Wesseling, advocaten)

Appellants:

Other parties to the proceedings: Akcros Chemicals Ltd, European Commission (represented by: V. Bottka and P. Rossi, acting as Agents)

Other parties to the proceedings:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders Akzo Nobel NV, Akzo Nobel Chemicals GmbH and Akzo Nobel Chemicals BV to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Akzo Nobel NV, Akzo Nobel Chemicals GmbH and Akzo Nobel Chemicals BV to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 406, 7.12.2015.

1

---
**Exhibit 35.1**

 

**Servicer Compliance Statement of John Deere Capital Corporation**

 

I, Steven N. Owenson, Senior Vice President and Controller of John Deere Capital Corporation, state:

 

A review of John Deere Capital Corporation’s activities for the period from October 30, 2017 through October 28, 2018 (the “Reporting Period”) and of John Deere Capital Corporation’s performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of March 2, 2016 among John Deere Capital Corporation, John Deere Receivables, Inc. and John Deere Owner Trust 2016 has been made under my supervision, and to the best of my knowledge based on such review, John Deere Capital Corporation has fulfilled all its obligations under all relevant agreements in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

 
| Date: January 11,   2019 | John Deere Capital   Corporation |
|-------------------------------|----------------------------------|
|                          |                             |
|                          |                             |
|                          |                             |
|                          | By                               | */s/ Steven N. Owenson* |   |
|                          |                             | Steven N. Owenson |
|                          |                             | Senior Vice President   and Controller |

 

----
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Corey
Henry, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2016-1
(the Exchange Act periodic reports);

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4. Based
on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in
all material respects; and

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and
their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such
reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I
have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Wells Fargo Bank, National Association.



By:

/s/ Corey HenryName:

Corey HenryTitle:

President and Chief Executive OfficerSantander Drive Auto Receivables LLC, as Depositor(senior officer in charge of securitization ofthe depositor)Date:

March 29, 2019
Exhibit 32.1








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, William E. Waltz, the Chief Executive Officer of Atkore International Group Inc., certify that (i) the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2018, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Atkore International Group Inc.





Dated:November 30, 2018/s/ William E. WaltzWilliam E. WaltzPresident and Chief Executive Officer, Director (Principal Executive Officer)
III 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 9 

Expressing the sense of the Senate regarding designation of the month of 

November as ‘‘National Military Family Month’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 24, 2005 

Mr. INOUYE (for himself and Mr. SALAZAR) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

NOVEMBER 10, 2005 

Committee discharged; considered, amended, and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the Senate regarding designation 

of the month of November as ‘‘National Military Family 

Month’’. 

Whereas military families, through their sacrifices and their 

dedication to our Nation and its values, represent the 

bedrock upon which our Nation was founded and upon 

which our Nation continues to rely in these perilous and 

challenging times: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate— 

2 (1) that the month of November should be des3 ignated as ‘‘National Military Family Month’’; and 

4 (2) to request that the President— 
2 

SRES 9 CDS 

1 (A) designate the month of November as 

2 ‘‘National Military Family Month’’; and 

3 (B) issue a proclamation calling upon the 

4 people of the United States to observe the 

5 month with appropriate ceremonies and activi6 ties. 

Æ
Exhibit 31.2


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Paul Spector, certify that,

(1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10Q of Aris Industries, Inc.;

(2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

(3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

(4) The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

(b) (Intentionally omitted)

(c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

(5) The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent function):

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize, and report financial information; and

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the Company's internal controls over
financial reporting;

Date:  November 13, 2003

/s/ Paul Spector
    Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit
4.1


 


DESCRIPTION
OF REGISTRANT’S SECURITIES


REGISTERED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 12 OF THE


SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


 


Set
forth below is the description of each class of securities of Veroni Brands Corp. (the “Company”) outstanding as of December
31, 2021. The following description summarizes the most important terms of these securities. This summary does not purport to be complete
and is qualified in its entirety by the provisions of our Articles of Incorporation and our Bylaws, copies of which have been previously
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and are incorporated by reference into the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2021. You should refer to our Articles of Incorporation, Bylaws and the applicable provisions of the Delaware General
Corporation Law for a complete description.


 


Common
stock, par value $0.0001 per share (the “Common Stock”) is the only class of our securities currently registered under Section
12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”). Our Common Stock is listed on the OTC Markets under the symbol
“VONI.”


 


Capitalization


 


Our
authorized capital stock consists of 100,000,000 shares of Common Stock, and 20,000,000 share of preferred stock, par value $0.0001 per
share.


 


Common
Stock


 


Dividend
Rights


 


Subject
to preferences that may apply to any shares of preferred stock outstanding at the time, the holders of our Common Stock may, receive
dividends out of funds legally available if our Board, in its discretion, determines to issue dividends and then only at the times and
in the amounts that our Board may determine. We have not paid any dividends on our Common Stock and do not contemplate doing so in the
foreseeable future.


 


Voting
Rights


 


Each
stockholder is entitled to one vote for each share of common stock held by such shareholder.


 


No
Preemptive or Similar Rights


 


Our
Common Stock is not entitled to preemptive rights, and is not subject to conversion, redemption or sinking fund provisions.


 


Right
to Receive Liquidation Distributions


 


Holders
of common stock are entitled to dividends when, and if, declared by the Board of Directors out of funds legally available therefore;
and then, only after all preferential dividends have been paid on any outstanding Preferred Stock. The Company has not had any earnings
and it does not presently contemplate the payment of any cash dividends in the foreseeable future.


 


Transfer
Agent and Registrar


 


The
transfer agent and registrar for our Common Stock is VStock Transfer, LLC with an address at 18 Lafayette Place, Woodmere, NY 11598.
Their phone number is (212) 828-8436.
Before the First Division,

April 12, 1951

No. 55463.

#### F. W. Berk & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 157785-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Cole, J.

The protests were dismissed.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-30609 Conference Calendar

WILLIAM EARL DEGRATE, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus CITY OF MONROE; JOE STEWART, Chief of Police, Monroe City Police Dep’t; BOB POWELL, Mayor of the City of Monroe, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 96-CV-244

- - - - - - - - - - April 10, 1998 Before JOLLY, JONES, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * William Earl Degrate has filed an application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal, following the district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. By moving for IFP, Degrate is challenging the district court’s certification that IFP should not be granted on appeal becauseNo. 97-30609 -2- his appeal is not taken in good faith. See Baugh v. Taylor , 117 F.3d 197, 202 (5th Cir. 1997). Degrate argues that the district court erred in not permitting him to pursue his claims that he was falsely arrested and imprisoned by the arresting officers. Because Degrate did not appeal to the district court the magistrate judge’s order denying Degrate’s motion to amend his complaint to add the claim against the officers, Degrate has not preserved the issue for appellate review. Colburn v. Bunge Towing, Inc. , 883 F.2d 372, 379 (5th Cir. 1989). Degrate has not shown that he is presenting a nonfrivolous issue on appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). Because Degrate has not demonstrated a nonfrivolous issue for appeal, the appeal is
DISMISSED. See Baugh v. Taylor , 117 F.3d 197, 202 n.24 (5th Cir. 1997); 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
No. 46337.

#### Protests 796119-G, etc., of T. D. Downing & Co., Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.