alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 10.2
​

CERTAIN IDENTIFIED INFORMATION HAS BEEN EXCLUDED FROM THE EXHIBIT BECAUSE IT IS BOTH NOT MATERIAL AND IS THE TYPE THAT THE REGISTRANT TREATS AS PRIVATE OR CONFIDENTIAL. REDACTED INFORMATION IS INDICATED BY [****].
FIRST AMENDMENT TO PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT
THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”) is made as of March 1, 2022, by and between by and between [****] (the “Seller”), and ALPINE INCOME PROPERTY OP, LP, a Delaware limited partnership (“Buyer”).
RECITALS
WHEREAS, Seller and Buyer entered into that certain Purchase and Sale Agreement dated effective as of January 28, 2022 (the “Agreement”), regarding the purchase and sale of those certain nine (9) parcels of land and related improvements thereon, as more particularly described in the Agreement; and
WHEREAS, Seller and Buyer desire to amend the Agreement as set forth in this Amendment.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing recitals (which are incorporated herein by this reference), and the covenants, terms and conditions contained herein and in the Agreement, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, Seller and Buyer hereby agree as follows:
AGREEMENT
1.Defined Terms.  Capitalized terms not defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Agreement.
2.[****].
3.[****]  
4.Full Force and Effect.  Except as specifically amended hereby, the Agreement remains in full force and effect and is hereby ratified by the parties hereto.  In the event that any of the terms or conditions of the Agreement conflict with this Amendment, the terms and conditions of this Amendment shall control.  Any references to the “Agreement” in the Agreement or any document delivered in connection therewith shall be deemed to mean the Agreement as amended hereby.
5.Counterparts; Signatures.  This Amendment may be executed and delivered by PDF, email or facsimile signatures and in several or separate counterparts, and each counterpart, when so executed and delivered, shall constitute an original agreement, and all such separate counterparts shall constitute but one and the same agreement.
​
​
[Signatures Appear on the Following Page]

​



​

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment on the day and year first above.
	​
	SELLER:

[****]
​
​

	​
	BUYER:

ALPINE INCOME PROPERTY OP, LP, a Delaware limited partnership
​
By:

Alpine Income Property GP, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, its General Partner



​

By:

Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc., a Maryland corporation, its Sole Member



​
​
By:   /s/ Steven R. Greathouse
      Steven R. Greathouse
      SVP and Chief Investment Officer



​

FIRST AMENDMENT TO PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT – Page 2
3940753-1 13170.009000
Case No. 14,621.

#### UNITED STATES v. BOLING.

[4 Cranch, C. C. 579.] 1

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

Oct. Term, 1835.

Indictment — Conclusion.

An indictment must conclude against the government of the United States.

[Suit by the United States against Joseph Boling.]

Indictment for robbery; against the peace of the United States.

Motion in arrest of judgment, because the indictment did not conclude against the government of the United States. See Act Cong. March 3. 1801, § 2 (2 Stat. 115), “supplementary,” &c.

THE COURT

(nem. con.) arrested the judgment.
# C_2015398EN.01001701.xml

| 30.11.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 398/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.11.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 398/17

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Düsseldorf (Germany) lodged on 3 September 2015 — Hüttenwerke Krupp Mannesmann GmbH v Hauptzollamt Duisburg

(Case C-465/15)

(2015/C 398/21)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Finanzgericht Düsseldorf

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Hüttenwerke Krupp Mannesmann GmbH

Applicant:

Defendant: Hauptzollamt Duisburg

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Is the third indent of Article 2(4)(b) of Council Directive (EC) No 2003/96 restructuring the Community framework for the taxation of energy products and electricity (1) to be interpreted with respect to the blast furnace process for the production of pig iron as meaning that electricity for the propulsion of the turbo blower is to be regarded as electricity which is used principally for the purposes of chemical reduction?

1

---

(1)  Council Directive 2003/96/EC of 27 October 2003 restructuring the Community framework for the taxation of energy products and electricity (OJ 2003 L 283, p. 51).

1

---
# C_2015414EN.01002301.xml

| 14.12.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 414/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.12.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 414/23

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État (France) lodged on 8 October 2015 — Melitta France SAS and Others v Ministère de l’Écologie, du Développement durable et de l'Énergie

(Case C-530/15)

(2015/C 414/29)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Referring court

Conseil d’État

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Melitta France SAS, Cofresco Frischhalteprodukte GmbH & Co. KG, Délipapier, Gopack SAS, Industrie Cartarie Tronchetti SpA, Industrie Cartarie Tronchetti Ibérica, SL, Kimberly-Clark SAS, Lucart France, Paul Hartmann AG, SCA Hygiène Products, SCA Tissue France SAS, Group’Hygiène syndicat professionnel

Applicants:

Defendant: Ministère de l’Écologie, du Développement durable et de l'Énergie

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

The Court is asked to decide whether by including ‘roll cores’ (rolls, tubes, cylinders) around which flexible material, such as paper or plastic film, is wound and sold to consumers in the examples of packaging, Commission Directive 2013/2/EU of 7 February 2013 (1) has misconstrued the term ‘packaging’, as defined in Article 3 of Directive 94/62/EC of 20 December 1994, (2) and exceeded the scope of the authorisation granted to the European Commission in respect of its implementing powers.

1

2

---

(1)  Commission Directive 2013/2/EU of 7 February 2013 amending Annex I to Directive 94/62/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on packaging and packaging waste (OJ 2013 L 37, p. 10).

1

(2)  European Parliament and Council Directive 94/62/EC of 20 December 1994 on packaging and packaging waste (OJ 1994 L 365, p. 10).

2

---
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Brett D. Davis, certify that:

 

1.                                      I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of CNH Equipment Trust 2016-A (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

 

2.                                      Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.                                      Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4.                                      I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

 

5.                                      All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Citibank, N.A.

 

March 25, 2019

 
|   | By:    | /s/ Brett D. Davis                                               |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Name:  | Brett D. Davis                                                   |
|   | Title: | President (senior   officer in charge of the servicing function) |

 

----
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

James Joseph Prince,

Plaintiff

 v.

Dr. Cha

and

Dr. Keaton,

Defendants

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Civil Action 2:13-cv-0035

Judge Watson

Magistrate Judge Abel

Report and Recommendation

It is RECOMMENDED that plaintiff Prince’s August 5, 2013 motion to proceed

on appeal in forma pauperis (doc. 19) be DENIED. Judgment has not been entered. The

court’s July 19, 2013 Order denying plaintiff’s motion for default judgment did not

adjudicate any of the claims pleaded in the complaint and is not a final appealable

order. See, Rule 54(b), Fed. R. Civ. P. The deadline for completing discovery remains

October 29, 2013.

If any party objects to this Report and Recommendation, that party may, within

fourteen (14) days, file and serve on all parties a motion for reconsideration by the

Court, specifically designating this Report and Recommendation, and the part thereof

in question, as well as the basis for objection thereto. 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(B); Rule 72(b),

Fed. R. Civ. P.

Case: 2:13-cv-00035-MHW-NMK Doc #: 21 Filed: 08/07/13 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
The parties are specifically advised that failure to object to the Report and

Recommendation will result in a waiver of the right to de novo review by the District

Judge and waiver of the right to appeal the judgment of the District Court. Thomas v.

Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150-52 (1985); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). See

also, Small v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 892 F.2d 15, 16 (2d Cir. 1989). 

The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to mail a copy of the complaint and this Report

and Recommendation to each defendant.

s/Mark R. Abel 

United States Magistrate Judge 

 

 

2

Case: 2:13-cv-00035-MHW-NMK Doc #: 21 Filed: 08/07/13 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
# C_2015346EN.01000901.xml

| 19.10.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 346/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.10.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 346/9

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de première instance francophone de Bruxelles (Belgium) lodged on 30 July 2015 — Criminal proceedings against  U (*1)

*1

(Case C-420/15)

(2015/C 346/10)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunal de première instance francophone de Bruxelles

Party to the main proceedings

Party to the main proceedings

U (*1)

*1

Question referred

Question referred

Are Articles 2 and 3 of the Royal Decree of 20 July 2001 on the registration of vehicles incompatible with Articles 18, 20, 45, 49 and 56 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, in that, in order to be driven in Belgium, even if only in order to pass through the country, vehicles belonging to a resident of a Member State of the European Union other than Belgium and registered in that other State must be registered in Belgium, if that person is also a Belgian resident?

---

(*1)  Information erased within the framework of the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data.

*1

---
# C_2016007EN.01003602.xml

| 11.1.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 7/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.1.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 7/36

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (3rd Chamber) of 18 November 2015 — FH v European Parliament

(Case F-73/15) (1)

1

((Civil service - Officials - Application for payment of the daily subsistence allowance - Implied rejection followed by an express rejection - No complaint against the implied rejection - Express rejection confirmatory in nature - Complaint time-barred - Manifest inadmissibility))

(2016/C 007/48)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: FH (represented by: M. Casado García-Hirschfeld, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: O. Caisou-Rousseau and N. Chemaï, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of the decision not to grant the daily subsistence allowance to the applicant following his transfer from the Commission, where he was employed in the EU Delegation to Yemen, to the European Parliament, in Brussels.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.

| 2. | The European Parliament is to bear its own costs and is ordered to pay the costs incurred by FH. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The European Parliament is to bear its own costs and is ordered to pay the costs incurred by FH.

---

(1)  OJ C 245, 27/7/2015, p. 50.

1

---
# Official Journal L 238/2014

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 238 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 579 August 2014 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 238

English edition

Legislation

Volume 579 August 2014

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Regulation (EU) No 865/2014 of 8 August 2014 correcting the Spanish version of Regulation (EU) No 10/2011 on plastic materials and articles intended to come into contact with food (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| | * | Commission Regulation (EU) No 866/2014 of 8 August 2014 amending Annexes III, V and VI to Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 of the European Parliament and the Council on cosmetic products (
  1
  ) | 3 |
| | | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 867/2014 of 8 August 2014 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables | 8 |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | | 2014/524/EU |
| | * | Commission Decision of 17 July 2013 on measure/aid scheme/State aid SA.34369 (13/C) (ex 12/N) — Construction and operation of public intermodal transport terminals, which the Slovak Republic is planning to implement
  (notified under document C(2013) 4423)

   (
  1
  ) | 11 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Regulation (EU) No 865/2014 of 8 August 2014 correcting the Spanish version of Regulation (EU) No 10/2011 on plastic materials and articles intended to come into contact with food (
  1
  )

1

1

*

Commission Regulation (EU) No 866/2014 of 8 August 2014 amending Annexes III, V and VI to Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 of the European Parliament and the Council on cosmetic products (
  1
  )

1

3

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 867/2014 of 8 August 2014 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

8

DECISIONS

2014/524/EU

*

Commission Decision of 17 July 2013 on measure/aid scheme/State aid SA.34369 (13/C) (ex 12/N) — Construction and operation of public intermodal transport terminals, which the Slovak Republic is planning to implement
  (notified under document C(2013) 4423)

   (
  1
  )

(notified under document C(2013) 4423)

1

11

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
No. 49371.

#### Protests 822688-G, etc., of Wing Woh Chong Co. (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Cole, J.

The merchandise was classified under the same paragraphs and claimed dutiable at the same rates as similar merchandise covered by the decision in *Quong Yuen Shing*v. *United States*(31 C. C. P. A. 43, C. A. D. 247). In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of said cited case the merchandise at bar was found to contain salt and was therefore excluded from paragraph 5. The protests were sustained to this extent.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 89 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 89

Congratulating the Montana FFA on its 75th Anniversary and celebrating 
                the achievements of Montana FFA members.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 17, 2005

    Mr. Burns (for himself and Mr. Baucus) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Congratulating the Montana FFA on its 75th Anniversary and celebrating 
                the achievements of Montana FFA members.

Whereas in 2005, the Montana FFA, chartered in 1930, celebrates its 75th 
        anniversary as a premier student development organization where members 
        gain life and leadership skills;
Whereas more than 40,000 Montanans have been FFA members;
Whereas Montana FFA alumni provide outstanding leadership to agriculture and 
        agribusiness at the local, State, and Federal levels;
Whereas the Montana FFA Association is the largest career and technical student 
        organization in the State, with over 2,550 members from 75 chapters;
Whereas the mission of the FFA is to make a positive difference in the lives of 
        students by developing their potential for premier leadership, personal 
        growth, and career success through agriculture education;
Whereas FFA is an integral component of agriculture education in the public 
        school system; and
Whereas the National FFA Organization is a federally-chartered organization: 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) congratulates the Montana FFA on its 75th anniversary; 
        and
            (2) directs the Secretary of the Senate to transmit to the 
        Montana FFA an enrolled copy of this resolution for appropriate 
        display.
                                 <all>
```
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v GLENN E. TANNER, Private First Class, U. S. Marine Corps, Appellant

11 USCMA 486, 29 CMR 302

No. 13,923

Decided May 13, 1960

*Lieutenant Commander Roland Wm. Coffey,*USNR, was on the brief for Appellant, Accused.

*Captain Warren C. Kiracofe,*USN, States. was on the brief for Appellee, United

Opinion of the Court

ROBERT E. Quinn, Chief Judge:

Present here is the same error in the sentence instruction which we considered in United States v Green, 11 USCMA 478, 29 CMR 294, this day decided. The decision of the board of review as to the sentence is set aside and the record of trial is returned to The Judge Advocate General of the Navy for submission to the board of review for reconsideration of the sentence.

Judge Ferguson concurs.

Latimer, Judge

(dissenting):

I dissent.

Accused here pleaded guilty to, and *487was convicted of, unauthorized absence and missing movement, in violation of Articles 86 and 87, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC §§ 886 and 887, respectively. After inquiring whether counsel had any proposed instructions on sentence, and receiving negative replies, the president of this special court-martial commenced his instructions as follows:

> “I will now instruct the court on sentencing matters and on the maximum legal punishment. The maximum punishment which may be adjudged by a special court-martial in any case is the maximum punishment for that type of court or the maximum total punishment for the separate offenses of which the accused stands convicted, whichever is the lesser punishment. In this case the lesser punishment is the maximum limit for a special court-marial [sic]. The maximum punishment which a special court-martial may adjudge is a bad conduct discharge, confinement at hard labor for six months, forfeiture of two-thirds pay per month for six months and where the accused is not a private, reduction the [sic] rank of private.”

Thereafter he mentioned the maximum penalties imposable for each offense but, before concluding, once more emphasized that the maximum the court must utilize in its deliberations on the case was the jurisdictional limitation for a special court-martial.

Thus, and for the reasons I set out in United States v Green, 11 USCMA 478, 29 CMR 294, decided this date, I must disagree with the conclusion of my associates. I would affirm the decision of the board of review.
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
Youhave reached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection(FDLP/EC) Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in theFDLP/EC. Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suiteof cataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications (CGP).
**Title:****New freedom initiative [electronicresource]: a progress report
 
2002 |2004 | 2007
 
SuDoc Number:PR 43.8/2:
Item Number:0851-J-20 (online)
CGP System Number:000613544
 
October 4, 2017
 
 **