alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 555 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 555

To authorize the production of records by the Permanent Subcommittee on 
 Investigations of the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental 
                                Affairs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             August 3, 2006

     Mr. Frist (for himself and Mr. Reid) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
To authorize the production of records by the Permanent Subcommittee on 
 Investigations of the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental 
                                Affairs.

Whereas the Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations of the Committee on 
        Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs has been conducting an 
        investigation into the use of offshore tax havens for abusive tax 
        shelters;
Whereas the Subcommittee has received a number of requests from law enforcement 
        officials and regulatory agencies for access to records of the 
        Subcommittee's investigation;
Whereas, by the privileges of the Senate of the United States and rule XI of the 
        Standing Rules of the Senate, no evidence under the control or in the 
        possession of the Senate can, by administrative or judicial process, be 
        taken from such control or possession but by permission of the Senate; 
        and
Whereas, when it appears that evidence under the control or in the possession of 
        the Senate is needed for the promotion of justice, the Senate will take 
        such action as will promote the ends of justice consistent with the 
        privileges of the Senate: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Chairman and Ranking Minority Member of the 
Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations of the Committee on Homeland 
Security and Governmental Affairs, acting jointly, are authorized to 
provide to law enforcement officials, regulatory agencies, and other 
entities or individuals duly authorized by federal, state, or foreign 
governments, records of the Subcommittee's investigation into the use 
of offshore tax havens for abusive tax shelters.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 77 (Monday, April 23, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 20136-20137]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-7600]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service


National Register of Historic Places; Notification of Pending 
Nominations and Related Actions

    Nominations for the following properties being considered for 
listing or related actions in the National Register were received by 
the National Park Service before April 7, 2007. Pursuant to section 
60.13 of 36 CFR part 60 written comments concerning the significance of 
these properties under the National Register criteria for evaluation 
may be forwarded by United States Postal Service, to the National 
Register of Historic Places, National Park Service, 1849 C St., NW., 
2280, Washington, DC 20240; by all other carriers, National Register of 
Historic Places, National Park Service, 1201 Eye St., NW., 8th floor, 
Washington, DC 20005; or by fax, 202-371-6447. Written or faxed 
comments should be submitted by May 8, 2007.

J. Paul Loether,
Chief, National Register of Historic Places/National Historic Landmarks 
Program.

CONNECTICUT

Hartford County

Filley, Capt. Oliver, House, 130 Mountain Ave., Bloomfield, 07000420

[[Page 20137]]

Litchfield County

Riverton Historic District, Roughly bounded by Still and Farmington 
R and E. River Rd., Riverton, 07000419

Middlesex County

Parmelee House, 4 Beckwith Rd., Killingworth, 07000417

New London County

Lord, Capt. Enoch, House, 17 Tantummaheag Rd., Old Lyme, 07000418

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

District of Columbia

Bulletin Building, 717 6th St., NW., Washington, 07000422
Greater Fourteenth Street Historic District (Boundary Increase), 
1400 Blks of P St., Rhode Island Ave., N St. and Massachusetts Ave., 
Washington, 07000421

FLORIDA

Hillsborough County

Hillsborough County High School, Old, 2704 N. Highland Ave., Tampa, 
07000423

LOUISIANA

Iberville Parish

Bagatelle Plantation House, 695 LA 991, Sunshine, 07000424

MINNESOTA

Kandiyohi County

Willmar Tribune Building, 311 Fourth St. SW., Willmar, 07000425

Ramsey County

Payne Avenue State Bank, 965 Payne Ave., St. Paul, 07000426

NEBRASKA

Douglas County

Margaret, The, 2103 N. 16th St., Omaha, 07000427

WISCONSIN

Forest County

Butternut--Franklin Lakes Archeological District, Eagle River--
Florence Ranger District, Chequamegon-Nicolet National Forest Hiles, 
07000429

La Crosse County

Mindoro Cut, WI 108, bet. Mindoro and West Salem, Hamilton, 07000428

    A request for a Move has been made for the following resource:

LOUISIANA

Caddo Parish

Antoine, C.C., House 1941 Perrin St. Shreveport, 99001013

 [FR Doc. E7-7600 Filed 4-20-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312-51-P
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER REINSTATING APPEAL

Appellate case name: Charles R. Jones v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01-18-01079-CR

Trial court case number: 1510058

Trial court: 179th District Court of Harris County

This appeal was abated for appointment of new counsel to file a merits brief. A 

supplemental clerk’s record has been filed demonstrating that new counsel has been appointed. 

Appellant’s counsel has filed a motion for an extension of time to file the brief and subsequently 

filed the brief on December 14, 2020. Accordingly, we reinstate the appeal on the court’s active 

docket. We grant the extension motion and deem the brief timely filed on the date of this order. 

Appellee’s brief shall be due 30 days from the date of this order.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: ____/s/ Sarah B. Landau_____

Acting individually 

Date: ___December 17, 2020_____
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 7 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 7

Relating to the death of Howard S. Liebengood, former Sergeant at Arms 
                             of the Senate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 24, 2005

Mr. Frist (for himself, Mr. Alexander, Mr. Domenici, Mr. Cochran, Mr. 
        Hagel, Mr. Warner, Mr. Biden, Mr. Hatch, Mr. Kennedy, Mr. Dodd, 
        and Mr. Graham) submitted the following resolution; which was 
        considered and agreed toYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Relating to the death of Howard S. Liebengood, former Sergeant at Arms 
                             of the Senate.

Whereas Howard S. Liebengood served as a captain in the United States Army 
        Military Police Corps in Vietnam from 1968 to 1970, receiving the Bronze 
        Star and the Army Commendation Medal for his exemplary service;
Whereas Howard S. Liebengood began his service to the Senate in 1973 as minority 
        counsel to the Senate Watergate Committee;
Whereas Howard S. Liebengood served as an aide to the Senate Church Committee in 
        1975, as the minority staff director of the Senate Select Committee on 
        Intelligence in 1976, and as legislative counsel to Senate Majority 
        Leader Howard H. Baker, Jr., in 1980;
Whereas Howard S. Liebengood served as Sergeant at Arms of the Senate from 1981 
        to 1983;
Whereas Howard S. Liebengood served as chief of staff to Senator Fred Thompson 
        from 2001 to 2003, and as chief of staff to Senate Majority Leader 
        William H. Frist, M.D., from 2003 until his death in January, 2005;
Whereas Howard S. Liebengood was a caring and devoted husband, father, and 
        colleague who served with the utmost humility and distinction and was 
        admired and respected by all as a teacher, adviser, and friend; and
Whereas Howard S. Liebengood inspired others through his personal leadership, 
        generosity, and great love for the United States: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That--
            (1) the Senate has heard with profound sorrow and deep 
        regret the announcement of the death of Howard S. Liebengood; 
        and
            (2) the Secretary of the Senate communicate these 
        resolutions to the House of Representatives and transmit an 
        enrolled copy of these resolutions to the family of Howard S. 
        Liebengood.
                                 <all>
```
No. 50649.

#### Protest 52880-K/12311 of Haspel Brothers, Inc. (New Orleans).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the court found that the facts herein agreed upon were such as to bring the.case within the holding in *John Barr*v. *United States*(11 Cust. Ct. 88, C. D. 801), which record was incorporated herein. (See *John Barr*v. *United States,*324 U. S. 83, decided February 5, 1945.) In accordance therewith it was held that the currency of the invoices .should-be converted at the buying rate in the New York market at noon on the day of exportation (the “free” rate of exchange for pounds sterling), as *316certified by the Federal Reserve bank and set forth by the collector on each of the entries. The protest was sustained to this extent.
# C_2017063EN.01002201.xml

| 27.2.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 63/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.2.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 63/22

---

Order of the President of the Court of 10 November 2016 — European Commission v Portuguese Republic: supported by: Kingdom of Spain, Kingdom of the Netherlands

(Case C-495/15) (1)

1

(2017/C 063/30)

Language of the case: Portuguese

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 371, 9.11.2015.

1

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-1459

MARY L. OUTIN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Columbia. Dennis W. Shedd, District Judge.

(CA-94-1818-3-19BD)

Submitted: December 10, 1996 Decided: December 19, 1996

Before HALL, MURNAGHAN, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mary L. Outin, Appellant Pro Se. Jonathan Pharr Pearson, Stephen

Carrington Mitchell, OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART,

Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Mary L. Outin appeals the district court's order granting

summary judgment to Defendant in this employment discrimination

action. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. Outin v. Travelers Insurance Co., No. CA-94-1818-3-

19BD (D.S.C. Mar. 20, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

BRANDON LEE HUMPHREY,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 6 WAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

BRANDON HUMPHREY,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 7 WAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

BRANDON HUMPHREY,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 8 WAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Petitioner

v.

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 9 WAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court
[6 WAL 2022, 7 WAL 2022, 8 WAL 2022, 9 WAL 2022, 10 WAL 2022, 11 WAL 2022, 12 

WAL 2022, 13 WAL 2022, 14 WAL 2022 and 15 WAL 2022] - 2

BRANDON HUMPHREY,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

BRANDON HUMPHREY,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 10 WAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

BRANDON LEE HUMPHREY,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 11 WAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

BRANDON HUMPHREY,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 12 WAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

No. 13 WAL 2022
[6 WAL 2022, 7 WAL 2022, 8 WAL 2022, 9 WAL 2022, 10 WAL 2022, 11 WAL 2022, 12 

WAL 2022, 13 WAL 2022, 14 WAL 2022 and 15 WAL 2022] - 3

v.

BRANDON LEE HUMPHREY,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

BRANDON HUMPHREY,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 14 WAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

BRANDON HUMPHREY,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 15 WAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 13th day of June, 2022, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
(Reap. Dec. 9364)

#### D. J. Ambrosio *v.*United States

Entry Nos. 717223 ; 863150; 821247.

(Decided March 25, 1959)

Plaintiff not represented by counsel.

*George Goehram, Boub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Lawrence, Judge:

The records indicate that there was no appearance on behalf of plaintiff when the appeals for a reappraisement, enumerated on the schedule attached to and made part of this decision, were called for hearing, and the cases were consequently ordered submitted by the court.

*580Rule 5 (a) of the rules of the court provides that—

> The submission for decision of any case shall he made in open court by the parties thereto or their attorneys, or by stipulation, or by written request to the court, or by the court on its own motion. Where the plaintiff, petitioner, or appellant, or his attorney, in a case does not appear when the same is called, and after the opposite party has had opportunity to present evidence on the issues, it may be deemed submitted and may be decided by the court on the record as it appears therein.

Accordingly, I have examined the records in the appeals before the court and find nothing therein which tends in any way to overcome the presumption of correctness which attaches to the decision of the appraiser. I find and hold, therefore, that the proper values of the merchandise are the values returned by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-7384

BARRY L. RHODES,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; CHARLES M. CONDON,

Attorney General of the State of South

Carolina,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Joseph F. Anderson, District Judge.

(CA-99-1541-0-17BD)

Submitted: February 24, 2000 Decided: March 3, 2000

Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit

Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Barry L. Rhodes, Appellant Pro Se. William Edgar Salter, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Columbia, South

Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Barry L. Rhodes seeks to appeal the district court’s order

dismissing his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994

& Supp. 1999). Rhodes’ case was referred to a magistrate judge

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (1994). The magistrate judge

recommended that relief be denied and advised Rhodes that failure

to file specific objections to this recommendation could waive

appellate review of a district court order based upon the recommendation. Despite this warning, Rhodes failed to specifically

object to the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation.

The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate

judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of

the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been

warned that failure to so object will waive appellate review. See

Orpiano v. Johnson, 687 F.3d 44, 47 (4th Cir. 1982). Rhodes has

waived appellate review by failing to direct the district court to

specific errors in the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation. Rhodes filed only general, conclusory objections. We therefore deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal.

We further deny Rhodes’ motion for preparation of a transcript at

government expense. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-
3

rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
# C_2017030EN.01001401.xml

| 30.1.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 30/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.1.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 30/14

---

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 24 November 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf — Germany) — Lohmann & Rauscher International GmbH & Co. KG v BIOS Medical Services GmbH, formerly BIOS Naturprodukte GmbH

(Case C-662/15) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Approximation of laws - Directive 93/42/EEC - Medical devices - Class I device (sterile wound dressings) which has been the subject of a conformity assessment procedure by the manufacturer - Parallel imports - Addition to the labelling of information relating to the importer - Supplementary conformity assessment procedure))

(2017/C 030/15)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Lohmann & Rauscher International GmbH & Co. KG

Applicant:

Defendant: BIOS Medical Services GmbH, formerly BIOS Naturprodukte GmbH

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 1(2)(f) and Article 11 of Council Directive 93/42/EEC of 14 June 1993 concerning medical devices, as amended by Directive 2007/47/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 September 2007, must be interpreted as not requiring a parallel importer of a medical device, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which bears a CE marking and which has been subjected to a conformity assessment within the meaning of that Article 11, to carry out a further assessment designed to certify the conformity of the information allowing its identification which that parallel importer adds to the labelling of that device with a view to that device being placed on the market of the Member State of importation.

---

(1)  OJ C 118, 4.4.2016.

1

---
USGS HomeContact USGSSearch USGS

Geologic Quadrangle Map 1803 

#### Version 1.0              Posted November 2007  

## Geologic Map of the Middletown Quadrangle, Frederick, Shenandoah, and Warren  Counties, Virginia

### By Randall C. Orndorff, Jack B. Epstein, and Robert C. McDowell 

|  | The Middletown 1:24,000-scale quadrangle is one of              several quadrangles in Frederick County, Virginia mapped or being              mapped by geologists from the U.S. Geological Survey in Reston,              VA with funding from the National Cooperative Geologic Mapping              Program. This map was originally published as a paper product in              1999. It has been converted to GIS-based digital form. This work              is part of a project being lead by the U.S. Geological Survey Water              Resources Discipline, Virginia District, to investigate the geologic              framework and groundwater resources of Frederick County as well              as other areas in the northern Shenandoah Valley of Virginia and              West Virginia. For more information about the Project see: http://geology.er.usgs.gov/eespteam/Karst/ for              Geologic Discipline efforts and http://va.water.usgs.gov/va134/index.htm for            Water Resources Discipline efforts. 
-  Geologic map  [19.1 MB PDF]
- GIS data
Readme
Metadata
 [10 KB] 
GIS_data.zip
 [4.6 MB]
Base_map.zip
 [2.9 MB]

  |
|--|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----