alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2015065EN.01003202.xml

| 23.2.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 65/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.2.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 65/32

---

Judgment of the General Court of 14 January 2015 — Gossio v Council

(Case T-406/13) (1)

1

((Common Foreign and Security Policy - Specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities in view of the situation in Côte d'Ivoire - Freezing of funds - Misuse of power - Manifest error of assessment - Fundamental Rights))

(2015/C 065/45)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Marcel Gossio (Abidjan, Ivory Coast) (represented by: S. Zokou, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: B. Driessen and G. Étienne, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment, first, of Council Regulation (EC) No 560/2005 of 12 April 2005 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities in view of the situation in Côte d'Ivoire (OJ 2005 L 95, p. 1), Council Decision 2010/656/CFSP of 29 October 2010 renewing the restrictive measures against Côte d’Ivoire (OJ 2010 L 285, p. 28), and Council Implementing Decision 2012/144/CFSP of 8 March 2012 implementing Decision 2010/656 (OJ 2012 L 71, p. 50) insofar as they concern the applicant, and, second, of the Council’s decision of 17 May 2013 to maintain the restrictive measures relating to the applicant.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | annuls Council Implementing Decision 2014/271/CFSP of 12 May 2014 implementing Decision 2010/656/CFSP renewing the restrictive measures against Côte d'Ivoire and Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 479/2014 of 12 May 2014 implementing Regulation (EC) No 560/2005 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities in view of the situation in Côte d'Ivoire in so far as they relate to the applicant; |
| --- | --- |

1.

annuls Council Implementing Decision 2014/271/CFSP of 12 May 2014 implementing Decision 2010/656/CFSP renewing the restrictive measures against Côte d'Ivoire and Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 479/2014 of 12 May 2014 implementing Regulation (EC) No 560/2005 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities in view of the situation in Côte d'Ivoire in so far as they relate to the applicant;

| 2. | dismisses the action as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

2.

dismisses the action as to the remainder;

| 3. | orders each party to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

orders each party to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 313, 26.10.2013.

1

---
# Official Journal C 45/2015

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 45 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 587 February 2015 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 45

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 587 February 2015

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | Council |
| 2015/C 045/01 | Notice for the attention of certain persons subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2014/119/CFSP and in Council Regulation (EU) No 208/2014 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine | 1 |
| | European Commission |
| 2015/C 045/02 | Euro exchange rates | 2 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

Council

2015/C 045/01

Notice for the attention of certain persons subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2014/119/CFSP and in Council Regulation (EU) No 208/2014 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine

1

European Commission

2015/C 045/02

Euro exchange rates

2

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | OTHER ACTS |
| | European Commission |
| 2015/C 045/03 | Information Notice — Public Consultation — Geographical indication from the Republic of South Africa | 3 |
| 2015/C 045/04 | Acknowledgement of receipt of complaint CHAP(2014) 1984 | 6 |

V   Announcements

OTHER ACTS

European Commission

2015/C 045/03

Information Notice — Public Consultation — Geographical indication from the Republic of South Africa

3

2015/C 045/04

Acknowledgement of receipt of complaint CHAP(2014) 1984

6

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
# C_2016156EN.01001702.xml

| 2.5.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 156/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.5.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 156/17

---

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 17 March 2016 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State — Netherlands) — K. Ruijssenaars, A. Jansen (C-145/15), J.H. Dees-Erf (C-146/15) v Staatssecretaris van Infrastructuur en Milieu

(Joined Cases C-145/15 and C-146/15) (1)

1

((Air transport - Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 - Article 7 - Compensation payable to passengers in the event that their flight is cancelled or delayed by more than three hours - Article 16 - National bodies responsible for the enforcement of the regulation - Powers - Adoption of enforcement measures against the air carrier for payment of the compensation due to the passenger))

(2016/C 156/24)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Referring court

Raad van State

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: K. Ruijssenaars, A. Jansen (C-145/15), J.H. Dees-Erf (C-146/15)

Applicants:

Defendant: Staatssecretaris van Infrastructuur en Milieu

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 16 of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91, must be interpreted as meaning that, where an individual complaint has been made by a passenger to the body designated by each Member State pursuant to Article 16(1) of the regulation following the refusal by an air carrier to pay to the passenger the compensation provided for in Article 7(1) of the regulation, that body is not required to take enforcement action against the carrier with a view to compelling it to pay the compensation.

---

(1)  OJ C 198, 15.6.2015.

1

---
Exhibit 4.3.1


 


ADDENDUM NO. 1 TO 


WARRANT FOR THE PURCHASE OF


COMMON STOCK


December 28, 2021


 


This Addendum modifies the terms of the Warrant
granted by Corphousing, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Company”), to EBOL Holdings LLC for the purchase of up
to $500,000 of the shares of the Company’s common stock, based on the per-unit offering price in the Company’s initial public
offering of its common stock (“IPO”). Notwithstanding anything to the contrary, the Warrant shall be issuable and become
exercisable only upon successful completion of an initial public offering (“IPO”). If no IPO is completed, the Warrant shall
not be issued or deemed exercisable in any regard or manner.


 





	 	CORPHOUSING LLC
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Shanoop Kothari
	 	Title: 	CFO
	 	 	 
	 	EBOL HOLDINGS LLC
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Edward Rogers
	 	Title: 	Manager


 






    1
Exhibit 32

                           Section 1350 Certifications

      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
      the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of
      TransNet Corporation (the "Company") hereby certify to such officer's
      knowledge that:

1.    The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal period
      ended September 30, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.    The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of
      the Company.

/s/ Steven J. Wilk
--------------------------------
Steven J. Wilk
Chief Executive Officer

Date: November 13, 2009

/s/ John J. Wilk
--------------------------------
John J. Wilk
Chief Financial Officer

Date: November 13, 2009

                                                                              20
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-6644 JAMES GILBERT WOODSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. J.D. HUPPENTHAL, Administrator; PRIMECARE MEDICAL; KIM BROWNING, Head Nurse; WV REGIONAL JAIL AND CORRECTIONAL FACILITY AUTHORITY; OFFICER HINDSON, Corrections Officer, Retired, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Beckley. Thomas E. Johnston, District Judge. (5:07-cv-00141) Submitted: June 19, 2008 Decided: June 25, 2008 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James Gilbert Woodson, Appellant Pro Se. Chad Marlo Cardinal, Assistant Attorney General, Charleston, West Virginia; Joseph- 2 - Dustin Dillard, John Do rsey Hoffman, FLAHERTY, SENSABAUGH & BONASSO, PLLC, Charleston, West Virginia; Mark William Browning, David L. Shuman, Sr., SHUMAN, MCCUSKEY & SLICER, PLLC, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 3 - PER CURIAM: James Gilbert Woodson appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Woodson v. Huppenthal , No. 5:07-cv-00141 (S.D.W. Va. Mar. 27, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 32b

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Twin Disc, Incorporated (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ending December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission as of the date hereof (the Report), I, Christopher J. Eperjesy, Vice President  Finance, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and                   
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|   

/s/ CHRISTOPHER J. EPERJESYChristopher J. EperjesyVice President  Finance, ChiefFinancial Officer and Secretary

February 9, 2007

---
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-81,510-02

EX P ARTE SHE RON G ABRIEL T ERRELL, Ap plicant
ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. 11CR1752-83- 2 IN THE 56 DISTRICT COURT FROM GA LVEST ON COUNTY

T H
Per curiam . O R D E R Pursuant to the provisi o n s o f Ar t icle 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedur e, the cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habea s corpus. Ex parte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of possession of a controlled substanc e and se ntence s to thirteen y ear s’ imprisonment. On September 24, 2015, an order desig nating issues was signe d by the trial court. Trial counsel has not y et submit t ed h i s af fi d avit to the trial court. I t appea rs the trial court has not completed its fac t finding
. We rema nd this application to the 5 6 Di s t ri ct Court of Galveston t h County to allow the trial judge to complete an evidentiar y investiga

tion and enter finding s of fac t and conclusions of law
.This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fac t issues. The

i s s u es s hall be resolved within 90 day s of this order
. A supplemental transcr ipt containing al l aff idavits and int err og atories or the t ransc ription of t he court repor ter’s notes from any hear ing or deposition, along with the trial court’ s supplemental finding s of fa ct and c onclusions of law, shall be forwar ded to this Court within 120 day s of the date of this order. A ny extensions of t ime shall be obtained f

rom this Court.

Filed: April 13, 2016 Do not publish
KOTZEBUE SOUND

BATHYMETRIC MAP = | NOATAK

510000m y 60000 162° 3
— | —__1_—_68° 2
5 3
|
z
6 i
z
g
a
j
& ~
te
bw
%,
“t
9
&
.:
S
iy
i

t

a] \ 573
o N
Qo
Q
alZ
Zl
& = 617
Wi x=
tu Zz
Q
4
| ==>
o} 661 {
|
| J
Talikoot
= e
. 927 z
Z E Shesualek Es
e
971 |
ki j f 6 :
5]0000m 6 : i i } eqo000mg, |
Bathymetry compiled by the National Ocean Service (NOS) from Bathy- Cc E TAL U MANAGEMENT MAP 165° BATHYMETRIC DATA INDEX 162° }
metric Data other than NOS hydrographic surveys. This is a facsimile OUTER CONTINEN SHELF RESOURCE - 6s 68 NOATAK
reproduction of the bathymetric manuscript and does not necessarily !
represent the final published form. This information is not intended for ; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE NOS NQ 3-2 (OCS) {2
navigational purposes. NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION Bathymetrig data from sources other than
Bathymetric Contour Intervals: 10 meters to maximum depth, supplemented NATIONAL OCEAN SERVICE NOS hydrographic surveys.
by 2 meter intervals.
Datum: Mean Lower Low Water (MLLW). 1986
Universal Transverse Mercator Grid. Zone 3; 10,000 meter ticks(---) are : .
shown inside the neatline. Produced at Washington, D.C. iyoex 10 aboinne
3° NG SHEETS \°
Protraction Diagram data shown in a subdued (screened) black was com- for ee —— a 159",
piled by the Minerals Management Service (MMS). von ufc]
THIS MAP IS NOT A LEGAL DOCUMENT for Federal leasing purposes; for UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR NR gre [PE KONG MTs =
such purposes use the MMS Outer Continental Shelf Official Protraction 4
Diagrams, MINERALS MANAGEMENT SERVICE
Heavy line(s) indicate limits of these protraction diagrams. orl eo ont
165° 762" i
EVALUATION OF BATHYMETRIC DATA SVERSE MERCATOR PROJECTION
TRAN
Scale 1:250,000 eset |
5 ie} 5 10 15 20 Statute Miles iH
= =3 66°
Bathymetry compiled by the National Ocean Service from 5 ° 5 10 15 20 25 30 Kilometers ‘168° 159"
Random Tracklines and Bathymetric Surveys dated 1944 to 1974. —— a —— 2 " ——=} {
‘The Bathymetric Data ranges in scale trom 1:500:000 to . 5 ® 5 10 Te Noulcal Miles |
}

1:1,000,000 with a minimum line spacing of 3.0 and a maximum
line spacing of 15.0 nautical miles.

Data corrected for sound velocity according to Echo-Sounding
Correction Tables, 1980.

\
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v SAMUEL E. McGIRK, Yeoman Second Class, U. S. Navy, Appellant

8 USCMA 429, 24 CMR 239

No. 10,224

Decided November 15, 1957

*Commander H. H. Brandenburg*was on the brief for Appellant, Accused.

*Commander Guilbert W. Martin*was on the brief for Appellee, United States.

Opinion of the Court

Homer Ferguson, Judge:

The accused in this case was found guilty in accordance with his plea of three specifications alleging solicitation and receipt of money from enlisted men as compensation for obtaining a transfer from the Naval Air Technical Training Center, Memphis, Tennessee, to the United States Naval Air Station, Quonset Point, Rhode Island, and one specification alleging only the receipt of money to effect such a transfer, all in violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 934, and one specification alleging the violation of a lawful regulation, in contravention of Article 92, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 892.

We brought this case here to consider the prejudicial effect of the law officer’s reference to paragraph 76, Manual for Courts-Martial, United States, 1951, on the court’s sentence deliberations. After both sides had presented argument on the sentence, the law officer “invite [d] the court’s attention to page *430121, paragraph 76, of the Manual for Courts-Martial, and also, to Chapter XXV which deals with punishments,” and further advised that if the court had “any question as to legality they will find it within those sections.”

In United States v Rinehart, 8 USCMA 402, 24 CMR 212, we discussed in great detail the mischief which may occur as a result of the court members’ use of the Manual in closed session. Here, the law officer not only invited the members to use the Manual during their deliberations on the sentence, but also assured them that the sections referred to would answer “any question as to legality.” Paragraph 76 of the Manual, supra, pertains to sentence considerations and contains a great deal of matter relating exclusively to policy and procedure. The very first section of this paragraph refers to paragraph 3372., supra, which states “that the retention in the armed forces of thieves and persons guilty of moral turpitude injuriously reflects upon the good name of the military service and its self-respecting personnel.” In Rinehart, supra, we compared this Manual provision, promulgated pursuant to a Presidential Executive Order, to a policy directive announced by the Secretary of the Navy in a SECNAV instruction, and concluded that though “the source of the reference is different, the prejudice is the same.”

Accordingly, we hold that the use of the Manual by the court-martial during its deliberations on sentence substantially prejudiced the accused. The decision of the board of review is reversed and a rehearing on the sentence is ordered.

Chief Judge Quinn concurs.

LATIMER, Judge

(dissenting):

My reasons for dissenting are set out in United States v Rinehart, 8 USCMA 402, 24 CMR 212, decided this date.
(Reap. Dec. 9371)

#### JohN V. Carr & Son, Inc. *v.*United States

Entry Nos. 14214; 13466; 23000.

(Decided April 2, 1959)

*Jolm C. Rag*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Mollison, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement enumerated in tbe attached schedule are from findings of value made by tbe appraiser at tbe port of Detroit on certain washing machine parts imported from Canada.

The appeals have been submitted for decision upon a stipulation of counsel for tbe parties, on the basis of which I find cost of pro*586duction, as defined in section 402(f), Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise involved and that such value is as follows:

As to Reappraisement No. R58/8960, Canadian

Entry No. 14214 of 1/24/57 Currency

1,500 pieces_$118. 63 per 100

As to Reappraisement No. R58/8961,

Entry No. 13466 of 1/9/57

1,173 pieces-$119.58 per 100

As to Reappraisement No. R58/8962,

Entry No. 23000 of 6/10/57

1,000 pieces_ $119. 58 per 100

Judgment will issue accordingly.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 77 (Monday, April 23, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 20136]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-7632]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[MT-020-1010-PO]


Notice of Public Meeting, Eastern Montana Resource Advisory 
Council Meeting

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior, Montana, Billings and 
Miles City Field Offices.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Land Policy and Management Act 
(FLPMA) and the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972 (FACA), the U.S. 
Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Eastern 
Montana Resource Advisory Council (RAC), will meet as indicated below.

DATES: The meetings will be held May 30 and 31, 2007 in Miles City, MT 
with each day beginning at 8 a.m. The meetings will adjourn at 
approximately 3:30 p.m. each day. The public comment period will be at 
approximately 11 a.m. on the 31st. When determined, the meeting place 
will be announced in a news release.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mark Jacobsen, Public Affairs 
Specialist, Miles City Field Office, 111 Garryowen Road, Miles City, 
Montana 59301. Telephone: (406) 233-2831.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 15-member Council advises the Secretary 
of the Interior, through the Bureau of Land Management, on a variety of 
planning and management issues associated with public land management 
in Montana. At this meeting, topics to discuss include:

Field Manager Updates,
The Miles City Field Office and Billings Field Office Updates,
Subcommittee updates and working sessions,
--and other topics the council may raise.

    All meetings are open to the public. The public may present written 
comments to the Council. Each formal Council meeting will also have 
time allocated for hearing public comments. Depending on the number of 
persons wishing to comment and time available, the time for individual 
oral comments may be limited. Individuals who plan to attend and need 
special assistance, such as sign language interpretation, tour 
transportation or other reasonable accommodations, should contact the 
BLM as provided above.

    Dated: April 16, 2007.
M. Elaine Raper,
Field Manager.
 [FR Doc. E7-7632 Filed 4-20-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-$$-P
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

EDMUND J. COPPOLA, 

Appellant, 

v.

Case No. 5D22-880

LT Case No. 2015-DR-020181

MARGARET COPPOLA, 

Appellee. 

________________________________/ 

Decision filed January 3, 2023

Appeal from the Circuit Court

for Brevard County, 

Nancy Maloney, Judge.

Scott T. Orsini, of The Orsini Law

Group, LLC, St. Petersburg, for

Appellant.

Tiffany Crews Loris, of The Loris

Law Group, Viera, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LAMBERT, C.J., EVANDER and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.
### Adams, Kevin (OST)

From: 

### Sent: To: 

### Subject:

Mr. Adams, Hyde, Vernon G <Vghyde@anthc.org> Wednesday, June 26, 2013 9:20 PM Adams, Kevin (OST) Reeve Air Alaska.

I am writing in regards fora formal recommendation for Mike Reeve with Reeve Air Alaska. I am a construction manager with theAlaska NativeTribal Health Consortium (ANTHC) and our company is tasked with building infrastructure throughout rural Alaska relating mainlywith water, sewer and medical facilities. We have used Reeve AirAlaska to provide flights in construction and maintenance projects in the Prince William Sound communities as well as many other communities throughoutthe rest ofthe state. We regularly use Reeve Airfor Anchorage-Chenega Bay-Tatitlek-Anchorage for passenger and also freight. Ifully endorse Reeve Air to provide an excellent service toTatitlek. 

# Vern H!lde Construction Manager Alasba NativeTribal Health Consortium 3900 Ambassador Dr.Suite 301 Anchorage, AK 99508 907-729-5694 Fax: 907-729·3728

1
No. 50654.

#### Protests 68763-K, etc., of Gimbel Bros., Inc., et al. (Baltimore, etc.).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

Following the authorities .cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.