alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 16**  **- 1954** 

NICOLE RENA MCCREA , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,
v. JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITIES, Office of Institutional Equity Vice Provost of Institutional Equity; JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITIES, Office of the Vice President and General Counsel; DEXTER SMITH; EILEEN HAASE , Defendants

- Appellees
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Baltimore
. James K. Bredar , District Judge. ( 1:15

- cv - 00579

- JKB )

Submitted : November 22, 2016 Decided: November 29, 2016

Before DIAZ and THACKER, Circuit Judges , and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge
.
Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
.
Nicole Rena McCrea , Appellant Pro Se. Elena D. Marcuss , Adam Thomas Simons , MCGUIREWOODS, LLP , Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Nicole Rena McCrea seeks to appeal three of the magistrate judge’s discovery orders and the distri ct court’s order denying her motion to certify an interlocutory appeal and for a stay pending appeal in her civil rights action. After McCrea filed her notice of appeal, the district court granted summary judgment for all Defendants and closed the case.
T his court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541, 545

- 46 (1949). When a notice of appeal is premature, the entry of final judgment can cure the resulting jurisdictional defect under the doctrine of cumulative finality, but only if the appealed order could have been certified for intermediate appeal under Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b ). In re Bryson , 406 F.3d 284, 28 7

- 8 9 (4th Cir. 2005) ; Equip. Fin. Grp. v. Traverse Computer Brokers , 973 F.2d 345, 347 (4th Cir. 1992)
. The order s McCrea seeks to appeal are neither final order s nor appealable interlocutory or collateral order s . Further, because the district court could not have certified these orders for immediate appeal under Rule 54(b), the cumulative finality doctrine cannot apply. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the ap peal for lack of juri sdiction.3 We deny McCrea’s motion for transcript at government expense and Defendants’ motion to place the case in abeyance. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this cour t and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

MAHLARD K. BOYD,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D19-1292 

[August 8, 2019]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Bernard I. Bober, 

Judge; L.T. Case No. 97-907CF10A.

Mahlard K. Boyd, Avon Park, pro se. 

No appearance required for appellee. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LEVINE, C.J., WARNER and GERBER, JJ., concur. 

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 12 (Friday, January 19, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 2531]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-707]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


National Center for Environmental Health/Agency for Toxic 
Substances and Disease Registry; The Program Peer Review Subcommittee 
of the Board of Scientific Counselors (BSC), Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention (CDC), National Center for Environmental Health/
Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (NCEH/ATSDR): 
Teleconference

    In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), CDC, NCEH/ATSDR announces the 
aforementioned subcommittee meeting:

    Time and Date: 10 a.m.-12 p.m. Eastern Standard Time, February 
6, 2007.
    Place: The teleconference will originate at NCEH/ATSDR in 
Atlanta, Georgia. To participate, dial 877/315-6535 and enter 
conference code 383520.
    Purpose: Under the charge of the BSC, NCEH/ATSDR, the PPRS will 
provide the BSC, NCEH/ATSDR with advice and recommendations on NCEH/
ATSDR program peer review. They will serve the function of 
organizing, facilitating, and providing a long-term perspective to 
the conduct of NCEH/ATSDR program peer review.
    Matters To Be Discussed: A discussion of Preparedness and 
Emergency Response Peer Review: (1) Breadth and approach of the 
review, (2) areas of expertise required for the review, and (3) 
nominations for a PPRS panel member, a chairperson, peer reviewers, 
partners and customers; a report on the Site Specific Activities 
Peer Review; and approval of the revised Peer Reviewer Conflict-of-
Interest Form.
    Agenda items are subject to change as priorities dictate.
    Supplementary Information: This meeting is scheduled to begin at 
10 a.m. Eastern Standard Time. To participate, please dial 877/315-
6535 and enter conference code 383520. Public comment period is 
scheduled for 11 a.m.-11:10 a.m.
    For Further Information Contact: Sandra Malcom, Committee 
Management Specialist, Office of Science, NCEH/ATSDR, MS E-28, 1600 
Clifton Road, NE., Atlanta, Georgia 30333, telephone 404/498-0622.
    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining 
to announcements of meetings and other committee management 
activities for both CDC and NCEH/ATSDR.

    Dated: January 12, 2007.
Edward Schultz,
Acting Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for 
Disease Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. E7-707 Filed 1-18-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
Case: 2:12-cv-00412-EAS-EPD Doc #: 8 Filed: 05/31/12 Page: 1 of 6  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00412-EAS-EPD Doc #: 8 Filed: 05/31/12 Page: 2 of 6  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00412-EAS-EPD Doc #: 8 Filed: 05/31/12 Page: 3 of 6  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00412-EAS-EPD Doc #: 8 Filed: 05/31/12 Page: 4 of 6  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00412-EAS-EPD Doc #: 8 Filed: 05/31/12 Page: 5 of 6  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00412-EAS-EPD Doc #: 8 Filed: 05/31/12 Page: 6 of 6  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-08T21:20:02-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
Before the First Division,

August 12, 1940

No. 44193.

#### Protests 966362-G, etc., of James H. Rhodes & Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of *Chrystal*v. *United States*(4 Cust. Ct. 78, C. D. 291) the merchandise in question was held dutiable as pumice stone, unmanufactured, at one-tenth of 1 cent per pound under paragraph 206 as claimed.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

SAMUEL REYES,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 286 MAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 16th day of October, 2019

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
Th

e Honorabl e Joh

n Shimku s Hous e o f Representative s Washington , D.C . 2051 5 Dea r Congressma

n Shimkus : Than k yo u fo r you r Apri l 6 , 201 5 lette

r regarding th

e renewa l o f th e Titl e V operatin

g penni t fo r th e Veoli aE S Technica

l Solutions , L.L.C . facilit y i n Sauget , Illinois . A s yo u ma

y know , senio

r U.S . Environmenta

l Protectio n Agenc y official s me t wit h Veoli aan

d it s representative s on Apri l 9 , 201 5 fo r nearl y thre e hours t o liste n t o Veolia' s concerns , whic h include dth

e issue s raise d i n you

r letter . Congressiona

l staf f fro mth e office s o f

Senato r Durbin , Rep . Bos t an dRep . Shimku s als o participate d i n th e meeting . Th

e Apri l 9t h meeting buil t

on a serie s o f meeting s ove

r severa l years t o discus s technica

l an dlega l issue s wit

h Veolia . EP A i s currently reviewin g th e irrformatio n Veoli aprovide da t th e meeting an

dwil l continue t

o wor k with th e compan y t o resolv e issue s relate dt

o th e proposedpermit . M y staf f wil l contac

t you r offic e t o ensur e tha t yo u ar e kep t up-to-dat e on th e statu s ofth e permit . Again , than

k yo u fo r you r letter . Ifyo u hav

e furthe r questions , pleas e contac

t m e o r you r staf f ma y contac t Ronn aBeckman

n o r Denis e Fortin , th

e Regio n 5 Congressiona l Liaisons , a

t (312) 886-3000 . Sincerely ,

Susa n Hedma n Regional Administrato r

Recycled/Recyclabl e • Printe dwit h Vegetabl e Oi l Base d Ink s o n 100% Recycle dPape r (100% Post-Consumer )
Exhibit 99.1


                                  CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
           AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Richard R. Erkeneff, as Chief Executive Officer of United Industrial
Corporation (the "Company") certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

         (1) the accompanying Form 10-Q report for the period ended September
         30, 2002 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the
         "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


Date:  November 14, 2002                              /s/ Richard R. Erkeneff
                                                      --------------------------
                                                      Richard R. Erkeneff
                                                      Chief Executive Officer
                                                      of the Company
JMK

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 19-0408

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

ANGELA MARIE SPROUT,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30-day extension of time, 

and good cause appearing therefor, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellee is granted an extension of time to 

and including March 15, 2021, within which to prepare, serve, and file its response 

brief.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

February 2 2021

02/02/2021

Case Number: DA 19-0408
# C_2017392EN.01000601.xml

| 20.11.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 392/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.11.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 392/6

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 21 September 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny — Poland) — Minister Finansów v Aviva Towarzystwo Ubezpieczeń na Życie S.A. w Warszawie

(Case C-605/15) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Taxation - Value added tax - Directive 2006/112/EC - Article 132(1)(f) - Exemptions for certain activities in the public interest - Exemption for the supply of services by independent groups of persons for their members - Applicability to insurance))

(2017/C 392/08)

Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Referring court

Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Minister Finansów

Applicant:

Defendant: Aviva Towarzystwo Ubezpieczeń na Życie S.A. w Warszawie

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 132(1)(f) of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax must be interpreted to the effect that the exemption provided for in that provision relates only to independent groups of persons whose members carry on an activity in the public interest referred to in Article 132 of that directive and that, therefore, the services supplied by independent groups of persons whose members carry on an economic activity in the area of insurance, which does not constitute such an activity in the public interest, are not entitled to that exemption.

---

(1)  OJ C 90, 7.3.2016.

1

---
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Maura D. Corrigan

Stephen J. Markm an

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly,

Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk January 12, 2011

p0111 

# Order

January 12, 2011

142374 & (18)(19)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 142374

COA: 300811

Ingham CC: 07

- 000674

- FH;

09

- 000908

- FH

NICKY CHAMP KOMOLMIS,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration and the motion for

miscellaneous relief are GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the December

13, 2010 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are

not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service 

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury. 

# ACTION:

Notice of Meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel VITA Issue Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comment, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service. 

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Monday, May 21, from 9 a.m. to 4 p.m.; Tuesday, May 22, from 9 a.m. to 4 p.m.; and Wednesday, May 23, 2007 from 8 a.m. to 11 a.m. Central Time. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Barbara Toy at 1-888-912-1227, or (414) 231-2360. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that a meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel VITA Issue Committee will be held Monday, May 21, from 9 a.m. to 4 p.m.; Tuesday, May 22, from 9 a.m. to 4 p.m.; and Wednesday, May 23, 2007 from 8 a.m. to 11 a.m. Central Time, at the Hotel Sheraton Gunter, 205 East Houston Street, San Antonio, TX 78205. Public comments will be welcome during the meeting. You can also submit written comments to the Panel by faxing to (414) 231-2363, or by mail to Taxpayer Advocacy Panel, Stop 1006MIL, P.O. Box 3205, Milwaukee, WI 53201-3205, or you can contact us at                     *www.improveirs.org.*                     Please contact Barbara Toy at 1-888-912-1227 or (414) 231-2360 for additional information.                 

The agenda will include the following: Various VITA Issues. 

Dated: April 20. 2007. 

John Fay, 

Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel. 

 [FR Doc. E7-8035 Filed 4-26-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
# C_2016462EN.01000501.xml

| 12.12.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 462/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.12.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 462/5

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 13 October 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Najwyższy — Poland) — Prezes Urzędu Komunikacji Elektronicznej, Petrotel sp. z o.o. w Płocku v Polkomtel sp. z o.o.

(Case C-231/15) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Electronic communications networks and services - Directive 2002/21/EC - Article 4(1) - Right of appeal against a decision taken by a national regulatory authority - Effective appeal mechanism - Decision of a national regulatory authority to continue to apply pending the outcome of the appeal - Temporal effects of a decision of a national court annulling a decision of a national regulatory authority - Possibility of annulling a decision of the national regulatory authority with retroactive effect - Principles of legal certainty and protection of legitimate expectations))

(2016/C 462/06)

Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Referring court

Sąd Najwyższy

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellants: Prezes Urzędu Komunikacji Elektronicznej, Petrotel sp. z o.o. w Płocku

Appellants:

Respondent: Polkomtel sp. z o.o.

Respondent:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 4(1), first subparagraph, first and third sentences, and second subparagraph, of Directive 2002/21/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on a common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services (Framework Directive), as amended by Directive 2009/140/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2009, in conjunction with Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, is to be interpreted as meaning that a national court hearing an appeal against a decision of the national regulatory authority must be able to annul that decision with retroactive effect if it finds that to be necessary in order to provide effective protection for the rights of the undertaking which has brought the appeal.

---

(1)  OJ C 294, 7.9.2015.

1

---
<PAGE> 1

Exhibit 32b

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Twin Disc, Incorporated (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ending December 31, 2004, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as of the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Christopher J. Eperjesy, Vice President - Finance, Treasurer and
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge:

     (3)    the Report fully complies with Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and

     (4)    the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


                                         /s/ CHRISTOPHER J. EPERJESY
                                         Christopher J. Eperjesy
                                         Vice President - Finance, Treasurer,
                                         Chief Financial Officer

                                         February 7, 2005
Conference Call with Tribal Environmental Professionals 

November 29, 2007 

Meeting Note to the Docket 

Discussion Topics 

On November 29, 2007, representatives from the US Environmental Protection Agency 

(EPA) participated in a meeting with a workgroup of interested tribal environmental 

professionals regarding the implementation of the rule titled: “Review of New Sources 

and Modifications in Indian Country.” The attendees discussed a draft document that 

will provide guidance to EPA employees on how to conduct effective consultation with 

tribes.
III 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 368 

To designate April 1, 2006, as ‘‘National Asbestos Awareness Day’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 7, 2006 

Mr. REID submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

To designate April 1, 2006, as ‘‘National Asbestos Awareness 

Day’’. 

Whereas deadly asbestos fibers are invisible and cannot be 

smelled or tasted; 

Whereas when airborne asbestos fibers are inhaled or swallowed, the damage can be permanent and irreversible; 

Whereas those fibers can cause mesothelioma, asbestosis, 

lung cancer, and pleural diseases; 

Whereas asbestos-related diseases can take 10 to 50 years to 

manifest themselves; 

Whereas the expected survival rate of those diagnosed with 

mesothelioma is between 6 and 24 months; 

Whereas little is known about late-stage treatment of, and 

there is no cure for, asbestos-related diseases; 
2 

•SRES 368 IS

Whereas early detection of asbestos-related diseases would 

give patients increased treatment options and often improve their prognosis; 

Whereas asbestos is a toxic and dangerous substance and 

must be disposed of properly; 

Whereas nearly half of the more than 1,000 screened firefighters, police officers, rescue workers, and volunteers 

who responded to the World Trade Center attacks on 

September 11, 2001, have new and persistent respiratory 

problems; 

Whereas the industry groups with the highest incidence rates 

of asbestos-related diseases, based on 2000 to 2002 data, 

were shipyard workers, vehicle body builders (including 

rail vehicles), pipefitters, carpenters and electricians, and 

workers in the construction (including insulation work 

and stripping), extraction, energy and water supply, and 

manufacturing industries; 

Whereas the United States imports more than 30,000,000 

pounds of asbestos used in products throughout the 

United States; 

Whereas asbestos-related diseases kill 10,000 people in the 

United States each year; 

Whereas asbestos exposure is responsible for 1 in every 125 

deaths of men over the age of 50; 

Whereas safety and prevention will reduce asbestos exposure 

and asbestos-related diseases; 

Whereas asbestos has been the largest single cause of occupational cancer; 

Whereas asbestos is still a hazard for 1,300,000 workers in 

the United States; 
3 

•SRES 368 IS

Whereas asbestos-related deaths have greatly increased in the 

last 20 years; 

Whereas 30 percent of all asbestos-related disease victims 

were exposed to asbestos on naval ships and in shipyards; 

Whereas asbestos was used in the construction of virtually all 

office buildings, public schools, and homes built before 

1975; and 

Whereas the establishment of a ‘‘National Asbestos Awareness Day’’ would raise public awareness about the prevalence of asbestos-related diseases and the dangers of asbestos exposure: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate designates April 1, 2006, 

2 as ‘‘National Asbestos Awareness Day’’. 

Æ