alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
J,,'00 srq~s 

<~ ~z ~ W 

Z Q 

o~ 

PROZ~G~` 

UNtTED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

REGION IX 

75 Hawthorne Street 

San Francisco; CA 94105 

DEC z 0 2011 

Ted Schade 

Air Pollution Control Officer 

Great Basin Unified Air Pollution Control District 

157 Short Street 

Bishop, California 93514 

Dear Mr. Schade: 

Thank you for your timely submission of the Great Basin Unified Air Pollution Control District 2011 

Ambient Air Monitoring Network Plan, Apri120, 2011. We have reviewed the submitted document and 

have found that it is complete, informative, very detailed and meets all of the requirements for annual 

network plans as required by our regulations set forth under 40 CFR Part 58.10. While this letter serves 

as off'icial approval of the annual network plan, it does not constitute approval of the system 

modifications that are proposed in the plan for the future. We will continue to work with your district to 

review system changes as they proceed. 

If you have any questions regarding this letter or enclosed comments, please feel free to contact me at 

(415) 972-3851 or Michael Flagg at (415) 947-4134. 

Sincerely, 

Matthew Lakin, Manager 

Air Quality Analysis Office 

Air Division 

Enclosure 

cc: Christopher Lanane, GBUAPCD 
Comments on GBUAPCD 2011 Ambient Air Monitoring Network Plan 

Please update next year's annual network plan to reflect the following comments: 

• It would be helpful and informative if the site specific information presented on page 20 was 

updated in order clarify which instruments are operating at each site. For example, the monitor 

counts and corresponding POC numbers for Keeler and Mammoth Lakes do not match 

information in AQS. Also, POC numbers are not identified for Bill Stanley, Mono Shore, and 

White Mountain. 

• The site report from Mammoth Lakes does not include information from the filter based PMio 

instrument located at the site. 

• The plan should specify which sites are considered SLAMS. 

• As a general reminder, all future modifications (i.e. site shutdowns or relocation) of the SLAMS 

network need to be approved by EPA per 40 CFR 58.14.
Exhibit 12


      UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
 
                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                -------------------------------------------------
                       (In Thousands,  Except Ratios)
                                (Unaudited)


                                                            Three Months       
                                                            Ended March 31,     
                                                           1997         1996   
                                                       ---------------------- 
Earnings:
[S]                                                    [C]          [C]
 Income from continuing operations . . . . . . . . . . $190,154     $166,455 

 Undistributed equity earnings . . . . . . . . . . . .   (8,689)     (12,018)
                                                       --------     --------

   Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  181,465      154,437 
                                                       --------     --------

Income Taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  106,912       60,450 
                                                       --------     --------
 
Fixed Charges:

 Interest expense including amortization 
  of debt discount . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   91,964       98,016 
                                                       
 Portion of rentals representing an interest factor. .   35,538       27,373 
                                                       --------     --------
   Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  127,502      125,389 
                                                       --------     --------

Earnings available for fixed charges . . . . . . . . . $415,879     $340,276 
                                                       ========     ======== 


Fixed Charges -- as above. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $127,502     $125,389 
 
Interest capitalized . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .       --           -- 
                                                       --------     --------   
       Total fixed charges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $127,502     $125,389 
                                                       ========     ========


Ratio of earnings to fixed charges (Note 7). . . . . .      3.3          2.7 
                                                       ========     ========
(Reap. Dec. 10264)

#### C. J. Tower & Sons *v.*United States

Entry No. NF 2828.

(Decided May 23, 1962)

*Barnes, Richardson & Colburn*for tbe plaintiff.

*William R. Orriclc, Jr.,*Assistant Attorney General, for tbe defendant.

Oliver, Chief Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement relates to certain steam traps, exported from Canada and entered at the port of Niagara Falls, N.Y.

It is agreed between the parties that the steam traps in question are the same in all material respects as those which were the subject of *United States*v. *A. N. Deringer, Inc.,*46 Cust. Ct. 762, A.R..D. 127, the record in which case was incorporated herein by consent.

Stipulated facts, upon which this appeal has been submitted, establish that the proper basis for appraisement of the steam traps in question is statutory cost of production and that such value therefor is Canadian $10.97 each, and I so hold.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
No. 47572.

#### Protests 73882-K/90577, etc., of Naumes Forwarding Service et al. (Chicago, etc.).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification

 

I, Cory J. Reed, certify that:

 

1.                                      I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of John Deere Owner Trust 2016 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

 

2.                                      Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.                                      Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4.                                      I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicers and based on my knowledge and the compliance reviews conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

 

5.                                      All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: U.S. Bank National Association (as indenture trustee).

 

 

 

 
| Date: January 26,   2018 | By:    | */s/ Cory J. Reed*                            |   |
|-------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------|--------|
|                          |   | Cory J. Reed                                  |
|                          |   | President of John Deere   Capital Corporation |
|                          |   | (as Servicer)                                 |

 

----
# Official Journal C 163/2009

| | ISSN 1725-2423
  doi:10.3000/17252423.C_2009.163.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 163 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5215 July 2009 |

ISSN 1725-2423

doi:10.3000/17252423.C_2009.163.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 163

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5215 July 2009

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES |
| | Commission |
| 2009/C 163/01 | Commission communication in the framework of the implementation of Council Directive 90/385/EEC of 20 June 1990 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to active implantable medical devices(Publication of titles and references of harmonised standards under the Directive)
   (1) | 1 |
| 2009/C 163/02 | Commission communication in the framework of the implementation of Council Directive 93/42/EEC of 14 June 1993 concerning medical devices(Publication of titles and references of harmonised standards under the Directive)
   (1) | 6 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES

Commission

2009/C 163/01

Commission communication in the framework of the implementation of Council Directive 90/385/EEC of 20 June 1990 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to active implantable medical devices(Publication of titles and references of harmonised standards under the Directive)
   (1)

(Publication of titles and references of harmonised standards under the Directive)

1

2009/C 163/02

Commission communication in the framework of the implementation of Council Directive 93/42/EEC of 14 June 1993 concerning medical devices(Publication of titles and references of harmonised standards under the Directive)
   (1)

(Publication of titles and references of harmonised standards under the Directive)

6

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 121 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 121

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 26, 2007

  Received and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, 
                              and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
     Recognizing the benefits and importance of school-based music 
                   education, and for other purposes.

Whereas school music programs enhance intellectual development and enrich the 
        academic environment for students of all ages;
Whereas students who participate in school music programs are less likely to be 
        involved with drugs, gangs, or alcohol and have better attendance in 
        school;
Whereas the skills gained through sequential music instruction, including 
        discipline and the ability to analyze, solve problems, communicate, and 
        work cooperatively, are vital for success in the 21st century workplace;
Whereas the majority of students attending public schools in inner city 
        neighborhoods have virtually no access to music education, which places 
        them at a disadvantage compared to their peers in other communities;
Whereas the arts are a core academic subject, and music is an essential element 
        of the arts; and
Whereas every student in the United States should have an opportunity to reap 
        the benefits of music education: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),  
That it is the sense of the Congress that music education grounded in 
rigorous instruction is an important component of a well-rounded 
academic curriculum and should be available to every student in every 
school.

            Passed the House of Representatives April 25, 2007.

            Attest:

                                            LORRAINE C. MILLER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
# C_2008306EN.01002401.xml

| 29.11.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 306/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.11.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 306/24

---

Amendment to the vacancy notice for the post of Secretary General of the European Court of Auditors

(Reference: Official Journal of the European Union C 267 A of 22 October 2008, p. 1, and Official Journal of the European Union C 267 of 22 October 2008, p. 29)

(Reference: Official Journal of the European Union C 267 A of 22 October 2008, p. 1, and Official Journal of the European Union C 267 of 22 October 2008, p. 29)

(2008/C 306/06)

For technical reasons, the Court's Internet website and the e-mail address: Vacancy-Notice-SG@eca.europa.eu were not accessible between 6 p.m. and midnight on Friday, 14 November 2008, which was the deadline for applications for the above position.

If you tried to send an application between the times given above, you are invited to re-send your application to the e-mail address, together with evidence of your attempt to introduce the application on 14 November between the times stated.

The deadline for re-sending your application is 6 p.m. on Friday, 5 December 2008.

---
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-1580

BARBARA GROSHANS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus GORDON R. ENGLAND, SECRETARY, THE UNITED STATES NAVY; NANCY DOWLING, In her individual capacity; MELVIN REICHLING, In his individual capacity; MAXANNE WITKIN, In her individual capacity; DONALD FAULKNER, In his individual capacity, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (CA-01-1438-A) Submitted: October 7, 2002 Decided: December 3, 2002 Before NIEMEYER, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Barbara Groshans, Appellant Pro Se. Dennis Edward Szybala, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Barbara Groshans appeals the district court’s order dismissing her civil action. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Groshans v. England , No. CA-01-1438-A (E.D. Va. filed Mar. 28, 2002; entered Mar. 29, 2002 & filed May 3, 2002; entered May 6, 2002). Groshans’ motion to strike the Appellees’ brief is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
No. 49384.

#### Protests 867547-G, etc., of Zucker & Josephy, Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

The testimony showed that certain items consist of hats in chief value of hemp, similar to those involved in Abstract 47291, which record was incorporated herein. In accordance therewith certain of the items as set forth in decision herein were held dutiable at 25 percent under paragraph 1504 (b) (1) as claimed.
PROJCS["North_American_1983_UTM_Zone_15N",GEOGCS["GCS_North_American_1983",DATUM["D_North_American_1983",SPHEROID["GRS_1980",6378137.0,298.257222101]],PRIMEM["Greenwich",0.0],UNIT["Degree",0.0174532925199433]],PROJECTION["Transverse_Mercator"],PARAMETER["False_Easting",500000.0],PARAMETER["False_Northing",0.0],PARAMETER["Central_Meridian",-93.0],PARAMETER["Scale_Factor",0.9996],PARAMETER["Latitude_Of_Origin",0.0],UNIT["Meter",1.0]]
# C_2017239EN.01000701.xml

| 24.7.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 239/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.7.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 239/7

---

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 18 May 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Vilniaus apygardos administracinis teismas — Lithuania) — ‘Litdana’ UAB v Valstybinė mokesčių inspekcija prie Lietuvos Respublikos finansų ministerijos

(Case C-624/15) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Taxation - Value added tax (VAT) - Directive 2006/112/EC - Article 314 - Margin scheme - Conditions under which it is applicable - Refusal by the national tax authorities to grant a taxable person the right to apply the margin scheme - References on the invoices relating both to the application of the margin scheme by the supplier and to exemption from VAT - Margin scheme not applied by the supplier to the supply - Indications giving grounds for suspecting an infringement or fraud in the supply))

(2017/C 239/09)

Language of the case: Lithuanian

Referring court

Referring court

Vilniaus apygardos administracinis teismas

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant:‘Litdana’ UAB

Applicant:

Defendant: Valstybinė mokesčių inspekcija prie Lietuvos Respublikos finansų ministerijos

Defendant:

Third party: Klaipėdos apskrities valstybinė mokesčių inspekcija

Third party:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 314 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax, as amended by Council Directive 2010/45/EU of 13 July 2010, must be interpreted as precluding the competent authorities of a Member State from denying a taxable person the right to apply the margin scheme where he received an invoice that includes references relating both to the margin scheme and to exemption from value added tax (VAT), even if it is apparent from a subsequent check carried out by those authorities that the taxable dealer supplying the second-hand goods had not actually applied that scheme to the supply of those goods, unless it is established by the competent authorities that the taxable person did not act in good faith or did not take every reasonable measure in his power to satisfy himself that the transaction carried out by him does not result in his participation in tax evasion — a matter which it is for the referring court to determine.

---

(1)  OJ C 48, 8.2.2016.

1

---
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-50286

No. 96-50287

No. 96-50568

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

RENE GARZA BOTELLO,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. SA-92-CR-207

- - - - - - - - - -

October 29, 1996

Before GARWOOD, JOLLY and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Rene Garza Botello, federal prisoner # 34404-080, appeals

the district court’s denial of his motion for reconsideration of

the denial of his motion for a new trial, his motion requesting

the district court to take judicial notice, and his motion for

subpoena duces tecum. Botello has filed motions for leave to

proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal in each of his three
No. 96-50286

No. 96-50287

No. 96-50568

- 2 -

appeals. We liberally construe Botello’s district court motions

as one motion for a new trial. See, e.g., United States v.

Lopez, 842 F.2d 755, 757 (5th Cir. 1988). Because the district

court granted Botello’s IFP motion in No. 96-50287 and because

his motions are liberally construed as one motion for new trial,

Botello’s IFP motions are DENIED as unnecessary.

Botello’s motions to consolidate his appeals are GRANTED. 

His request for a stay is DENIED as unnecessary.

Botello argues that the district court abused its discretion

in denying his motion for a new trial based on newly discovered

evidence. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and find no reversible error. United States v. Botello,

No. SA-92-CR-207 (W.D. Tex. October 30, 1995, March 29, 1996,

April 3, 1996, April 17, 1996). 

Botello’s appeals are without arguable merit and are thus

frivolous. See Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir.

1983). Because Botello’s appeals are frivolous, they are

DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. 

MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE APPEALS GRANTED; IFP MOTIONS DENIED AS

UNNECESSARY; STAY DENIED AS UNNECESSARY; APPEALS DISMISSED

AS FRIVOLOUS.
# C_2016326EN.01001901.xml

| 5.9.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.9.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/19

---

Order of the President of the Third Chamber of the Court of 9 June 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Østre Landsret — Denmark) — Delta Air Lines Inc. v Daniel Dam Hansen, Mille Doktor, Carsten Jensen, Mogens Jensen, Dorthe Fabricius, Jens Ejner Rasmussen, Christian Bøje Pedersen, Andreas Fabricius, Mads Wedel Rasmussen, Nicklas Wedel Rasmussen, Thomas Lindstrøm Jensen, Marianne Thestrup Jensen, Erik Lindstrøm Jensen, Jakob Lindstrøm Jensen, Liva Doktor, Peter Lindstrøm Jensen

(Case C-305/15) (1)

1

(2016/C 326/31)

Language of the case: Danish

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 294, 7.9.2015.

1

---
# C_2017437EN.01000301.xml

| 18.12.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 437/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.12.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 437/3

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 25 October 2017 — European Commission v Italian Republic

(Case C-467/15 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - State aid - Aid granted by the Italian Republic to milk producers - Aid scheme linked to the reimbursement of the milk levy - Conditional decision - Decision adopted by the Council of the European Union pursuant to the third subparagraph of Article 108(2) TFEU - Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 - Article 1(b) and (c) - Existing aid - New aid - Definitions - Alteration to existing aid in breach of a condition ensuring compatibility of the aid with the internal market))

(2017/C 437/03)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Appellant: European Commission (represented by: V. Di Bucci and P. Němečková, acting as Agents)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: Italian Republic (represented by: G. Palmieri, acting as Agent, assisted by S. Fiorentino and P. Grasso, avvocati dello Stato)

Other party to the proceedings:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Sets aside paragraphs 1, 2 and 4 of the operative part of the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 24 June 2015, Italy v Commission (T-527/13, EU:T:2015:429); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Sets aside paragraphs 1, 2 and 4 of the operative part of the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 24 June 2015, Italy v Commission (T-527/13, EU:T:2015:429);

| 2. | Dismisses the action brought by the Italian Republic before the General Court in Case T-527/13; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the action brought by the Italian Republic before the General Court in Case T-527/13;

| 3. | Orders the Italian Republic to bear its own costs and to pay those of the European Commission both at first instance and on appeal. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Italian Republic to bear its own costs and to pay those of the European Commission both at first instance and on appeal.

---

(1)  OJ C 406, 7.12.2015.

1

---