alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
file:///J|/SNURS/Quarterly%20SNUR%20Batches/Q14-3/June/P-12-0017%205(e)/p120017.ce1.txt[7/2/2014 9:34:02 AM] INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT PMN: 12-0017 Revised Standard Review Draft 4/12/2012 ENGINEER: Macek \ AG PV (kg/yr):

SUBMITTER: Sud-Chemie Inc.

MSDS: Yes Label: No Gen Eqpt: chemical safety goggles / suitable gloves / use only in well ventilated areas Respirator: MSHA/NIOSH (approved or equivalent) dust respirator Health Effects: not expected to be irritating to the skin / if solid gets in eye, it may cause mechanical irritation, but short-term exposure is not expected to cause chemical irritation / contact with this product is not expected to cause skin sensitization or respiratory tract sensitization TLV/PEL: None Establishedfile:///J|/SNURS/Quarterly%20SNUR%20Batches/Q14-3/June/P-12-0017%205(e)/p120017.ce1.txt[7/2/2014 9:34:02 AM] SAT (concerns) (11/01/2011): Related Cases and Related Cases and Misc SAT Info: Ecotox Related Cases: Same as L-11-337 (Hanwha International, LLC.). Analogs: . // Human Health Related Cases: (SAME COMPOUND) Migration to groundwater: Negligible PBT rating: P3B1T2 . Health: 1-2 Drinking Water, Inhalation Eco: 3 Water (All releases to water with a CC = 2 ppb) OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 2-3B NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS: Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER.file:///J|/SNURS/Quarterly%20SNUR%20Batches/Q14-3/June/P-12-0017%205(e)/p120017.ce1.txt[7/2/2014 9:34:02 AM] POLLUTION PREVENTION CONSIDERATIONS: No Pollution Prevention information provided by the submitter.

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT PMN: 12-0017

Number of Sites/ Location: 2 Unknown Sites Days/yr: 250

Process Description:file:///J|/SNURS/Quarterly%20SNUR%20Batches/Q14-3/June/P-12-0017%205(e)/p120017.ce1.txt[7/2/2014 9:34:02 AM] ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY IRER Note: The daily releases listed for any source below may coincide with daily releases from the other sources to the same medium. Air Output 2: 5.0E-2 kg/site-day over 250 days/yr from 2 sitesfile:///J|/SNURS/Quarterly%20SNUR%20Batches/Q14-3/June/P-12-0017%205(e)/p120017.ce1.txt[7/2/2014 9:34:02 AM] Incineration Output 2: 1.0E+1 kg/site-day over 250 days/yr from 2 sites or 5.0E+3 kg/yr

t a solvent is used and the waste is incinerated. Landfill Output 2: 5.0E+0 kg/site-day over 250 days/yr from 2 sites or 2.5E+3 kg/yr

Landfill Output 2: 1.0E+1 kg/site-day over 250 days/yr from 2 sites or 5.0E+3 kg/yr

Landfill Output 2: 2.2E+1 kg/site-day over 250 days/yr from 2 sites or 1.1E+4 kg/yr

rfile:///J|/SNURS/Quarterly%20SNUR%20Batches/Q14-3/June/P-12-0017%205(e)/p120017.ce1.txt[7/2/2014 9:34:02 AM] RELEASE TOTAL 2.4E+4 kg/yr - all sitesfile:///J|/SNURS/Quarterly%20SNUR%20Batches/Q14-3/June/P-12-0017%205(e)/p120017.ce1.txt[7/2/2014 9:34:02 AM]file:///J|/SNURS/Quarterly%20SNUR%20Batches/Q14-3/June/P-12-0017%205(e)/p120017.ce1.txt[7/2/2014 9:34:02 AM]file:///J|/SNURS/Quarterly%20SNUR%20Batches/Q14-3/June/P-12-0017%205(e)/p120017.ce1.txt[7/2/2014 9:34:02 AM]
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13

- 20656 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
DOMINGO GUERRA ESPINOZA, also known as Domingo Espinoza, also known as Domingo Espinoza Guerra, also known as Domingo Espinoza

Guerra, also known as Miguel A. Espinoza, also known as Domingo Espinosa, also known as Domingo G. Espinoza, also known as Mingo Guerra,

Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:13

- CR

- 318

- 1

Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
The attorney appointed to represent Domingo Guerra Espinoza has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Guerra Espinoza h a s not filed a response. We have reviewed

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED November 4, 2014 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 13-20656 Document: 00512825320 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/04/2014No. 13

- 20656

counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2.

2 Case: 13-20656 Document: 00512825320 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/04/2014
# Official Journal C 124/2010

| | ISSN 1725-2423
  doi:10.3000/17252423.C_2010.124.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 124 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5312 May 2010 |

ISSN 1725-2423

doi:10.3000/17252423.C_2010.124.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 124

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5312 May 2010

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | Court of justice of the European Union |
| 2010/C 124/01 | Report on budgetary and financial management in 2009 | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

Court of justice of the European Union

2010/C 124/01

Report on budgetary and financial management in 2009

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
**Exhibit 32****CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT**The undersigned officers of **United Components, Inc.**hereby certify pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that: 1. the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of United Components, Inc. for the quarter endedSeptember 30, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of United Components, Inc.       Date: November 14, 2007        By:
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 83 (Tuesday, May 1, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 23819]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-8230]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States. 
Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained 
from the National Information Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than May 25, 2007.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (David Tatum, Vice President) 
1000 Peachtree Street, N.E., Atlanta, Georgia 30309:
    1. Pro Financial Holdings, Inc., to become a bank holding company 
by acquiring 100 percent of the voting shares of ProBank (in 
organization), both of Tallahassee, Florida.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas (W. Arthur Tribble, Vice 
President) 2200 North Pearl Street, Dallas, Texas 75201-2272:
    1. Southwest Bancshares, Inc., San Antonio, Texas; to become a bank 
holding company by acquiring 100 percent of the voting shares of The 
Bank of San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, a de novo bank.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, April 25, 
2007.
Margaret McCloskey Shanks,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. E7-8230 Filed 4-30-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
Exhibit 35.7



|     |  |  |  |  |  |                                                                                                                        
|---- |  |  |  |  |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|LOGO |  |  |  |  |  | Corporate Trust Services 
MAC R1204-010 9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045 
Tel: 410 884 2000 Fax: 410 715 2380
|     |  | 
|     |  | 
|     |  | 
|     |  | 

Citibank, N.A.

388 Greenwich
Street

14th Floor

New York, New York 10013



|RE: | Annual Statement of Compliance for GS Mortgage Securities Corporation Trust 2015-590M, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2015-590M
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Per the Trust and Servicing Agreement dated as of November 10, 2015 (the Agreement), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo
Bank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator (Wells Fargo), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2015 (the Reporting Period):

(a) A review of Wells Fargos activities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under such
officers supervision; and

(b) To the best of such officers knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of
its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

March 1, 2016



|              
|--------------
|LOGO          
|              
|BRIAN SMITH   
|Vice President



|                       |  |     
|---------------------- |  | ----
|Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |  | LOGO
Before the First Division,

June 14, 1945

No. 50258.

#### Protests 65128-K, etc., of Garden State Tanning Co. et al. (New York).

Opinion by Oliver, P. J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is similar in all material respects to the hides involved in *Rice*v. *United States*(11 Cust. Ct. 118, C. D. 807). In accordance therewith the claim at 10 percent under paragraph 1530 (a) was sustained.
III 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 520 

To authorize the production of records, testimony, and legal representation. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 23, 2006 

Mr. FRIST (for himself and Mr. REID) submitted the following resolution; 

which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

To authorize the production of records, testimony, and legal 

representation. 

Whereas the United States Department of Justice is conducting an investigation into improper activities by lobbyists and related matters; 

Whereas the Committee on Indian Affairs and the Committee 

on Rules and Administration have received specific requests from the Department of Justice for records that 

may be relevant for use in the investigation; 

Whereas, pursuant to sections 703(a) and 704(a)(2) of the 

Ethics in Government Act of 1978, 2 U.S.C. §§ 288b(a) 

and 288c(a)(2), the Senate may direct its counsel to represent employees of the Senate with respect to any subpoena, order, or request for testimony relating to their 

official responsibilities; 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

SRES 520 ATS 

Whereas, by the privileges of the Senate of the United States 

and rule XI of the Standing Rules of the Senate, no evidence under the control or in the possession of the Senate can, by administrative or judicial process, be taken 

from such control or possession but by permission of the 

Senate; and 

Whereas, when it appears that evidence under the control or 

in the possession of the Senate is needed for the promotion of justice, the Senate will take such action as will 

promote the ends of justice consistent with the privileges 

of the Senate: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Committee on Indian Affairs and 

2 the Committee on Rules and Administration are author3 ized to provide to the U.S. Department of Justice the spe4 cific documents that have been requested by the Depart5 ment of Justice to date for use in legal and investigatory 

6 proceedings, and to provide related testimony from their 

7 staffs, if necessary, except where a privilege should be as8 serted. 

9 SEC. 2. The Senate Legal Counsel is authorized to 

10 represent employees of the Committee on Indian Affairs 

11 and the Committee on Rules and Administration in con12 nection with the document production and testimony au13 thorized in section one of this resolution. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
# C_2015245EN.01005001.xml

| 27.7.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 245/50 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.7.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 245/50

---

Action brought on 4 May 2015 — ZZ v ECDC

(Case F-71/15)

(2015/C 245/62)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: S. Orlandi and T. Martin, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC)

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Application for annulment of the appeal assessor’s decision establishing the definitive version of the applicant’s staff report in respect of 2013.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Tribunal should:

| — | annul the appeal assessor’s decision establishing the definitive version of the applicant’s staff report in respect of 2013; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the appeal assessor’s decision establishing the definitive version of the applicant’s staff report in respect of 2013;

| — | order the ECDC to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the ECDC to pay the costs.

---
Case No. 9,208.

#### The MARY E. RIGGS.

TCited in Baker v. The Slobodna, 35 Fed. 544. Nowhere reported; opinion not now accessible.]
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v OTIS B. LITTLEJOHN, Airman Apprentice, U. S. Navy, Appellant

18 USCMA 590, 40 CMR 302

No. 22,238

September 19, 1969

*Captain Frank A. Nelson,*JAGC, USN, and *Lieutenant Kenneth F. Ripple,*JAGC, USNR, were on the pleadings for Appellant, Accused.

*Captain William S. Foss,*USMCR, was on the pleadings for Appellee, United States.

Opinion of the Court

Darden, Judge:

Absent supplementing evidence, the president’s *pro forma*inquiry does not satisfy us of the providency of appellant’s plea of guilty to the absences here charged. ■ Cf. United States v Care, 18 USCMA 535, 40 CMR 247. The decision of the board of review is reversed and the record of trial is returned to the Judge Advocate General of the Navy. A rehearing may be ordered.

Chief Judge Quinn and Judge Ferguson concur.
# C_2016364EN.01005502.xml

| 3.10.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 364/55 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.10.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 364/55

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 2 August 2016 — Polizzi v Commission

(Case F-70/15) (1)

((Civil service - Contract staff - Pensions - Article 11(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations - Transfer to the EU pension scheme of pension rights acquired under a national pension scheme - Decision recognising the crediting of pensionable years applying the new GIP relating to Articles 11 and 12 of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations - Article 81 of the Rules of Procedure - Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded))

(2016/C 364/72)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Rosalba Polizzi (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: S. Orlandi and T. Martin, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: initially J. Currall and G. Gattinara, Agents, then G. Gattinara, Agent)

Subject-matter of the case

Action for annulment of the final decision transferring the applicant’s pension rights to the EU pension scheme, which applies the new general implementing provisions (GIP) of Article 11(2) of Annex VIII of the Staff Regulations of 3 March 2011.

Operative part of the order

| 1) | The action is dismissed as in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded. |
| --- | --- |

1)

The action is dismissed as in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.

| 2) | The parties shall bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2)

The parties shall bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 245, 27.7.2015, p 49.

---
No. 64338.

protests 59/8672, etc. (Buffalo).

#### C. J. Tower & Sons of Buffalo, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of prepared or preserved pork similar in all material respects to that the subject of *C. J. Tower & Sons*v. *United States*(43 Cust. Ct. 36, C.D. 2100), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA

No. 3 7 6A 1 4

Filed 18 December 2015 BERRY ANDERSON, JONATHAN BREAREY, JUDITH BURNETTE, STEPHEN BURNETTE, YVONNE BURNETTE, EARLIE JAMES BUTLER, LINDA BUTLER, SARA COURTNEY, MICHAEL DONOVAN, SUE DEE DUNCAN, EAG PROPERTIES, LLC, JOANNE ESSLING, WILLIAM ESSLING, WILLIAM ESSLING, JR., EILEEN FAGAN, GARY FAGAN, EDMOND GIROUX, MICHAEL GRANDINETTI, ROBIN GRANDINETTI, SETH JOHNSON, L INDA KASS, ROBERT KASS, JESSICA KEENAN, SHANE KEENAN, DAVID KUKURZA, DEBORAH KUKURZA, LUCKY 7 HOLDING CORPORATION, FRANCES MACCALLUM, JOHN MACCALLUM, JOHN MALAN, MARIAN MALAN, MICHAEL MCCABE, SHEILA MCCABE, BARBARA NARDELLA, MICHAEL NARDELLA, JOAN PARKIN, ROBERT PARKIN, BRENDA PICKERING, PHILIP PICKERING, JOHN PRICE, VIRGINIA PRICE, CHRISTINE RIGNEY, PATRICK RIGNEY, CHRISTOPHER ROCCO, JYOTI CHATLANI ROCCO, ELAINE ROWINSKI, STEVEN ROWINSKI, ALLISON SEN, ROHAN SEN, DAVID SHERMAN, SANDRA SHERMAN, DANNY WALKER, JEAN WALKER, JEFF WEBB, LAURIE WEBB, CAROLE WERKING, NOEL WERKING, CLARENCE WHICHARD, III, LINDA WHICHARD, GERALD WOLF, and MARY WOLF

v. COASTAL COMMUNITIES AT OCEAN RIDGE PLANTATION, INC., COASTAL COMMUNITIES AT OCEAN RIDGE PLANTATION, LLC, COASTAL C OMMUNITIES, INC., MARK A. SAUNDERS, DEBORAH BOODRO, MAS PROPERTIES, LLC, THE MORTGAGE COMPANY OF BRUNSWICK, INC., BRENDAN GORDON, JAMES POWELL, JAMES POWELL APPRAISALS, LLC, LYNN RABELLO, BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY, BB&T COLLATERAL SERVICE CORPORATIO N, FOUR OAKS BANK AND TRUST COMPANY, CLIFTON L. PAINTER, BAXLEYSMITHWICK PLLC, and DOUGLAS BAXLEY

Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A

- 27(b)(1) from opinions and order s granting

motion s to dismiss entered o n 2 7 June 201 1 and 13 June 2012 by Judge John R

. Jolly,

Jr. in Superior Court, Brunswick County. On 1 0 October 2014, pursuant to N.C.G.S.
§ 7A

- 31(a) and (b)(2) , and Rule 15(e)(2) of the North Carolina Rules of Appellate
Procedure, the Supreme Court on its own initiative certified the case for review pri orA NDERSON V

. C OASTAL C OMMUNITIES

Opinion of the Court

- 2

- to determination in the Court of Appeals. Heard in the Supreme Court on 18 March

2015

.

Hodges & Coxe, P.C., by C. Wes Hodges, II and Sarah R. Buzzard , for plaintiff

appellants

. Teague, Campbell, Dennis & Gorham, LLP, by Jacob H. Wellman and Natalia K. Isenberg

, for defendant

- appellees James Powell, James Powell Appraisals, LLC, and Lynn Rabello. Poyner Spruill LLP, by J. Nicholas Ellis and Caroline P. Mackie, for defendant

appellees Branch Banking and Trust Company and BB&T Collateral Service Corporation

.

PER CURIAM.

For the reasons stated in Arnesen v. Rivers Edge Golf Club & Plantation, Inc. , ___ N.C. ___ , ___ S.E.2d ___ (2015) (375A14), the decision of the trial court is affirmed

.

AFFIRMED.

Justice EDMUNDS concurs in part and dissent s in part for the r easons stated

in his opinion in Arnesen v. Rivers Edge Golf Club & Plantation, Inc. ,

___ N.C. ___, ___ S.E.2d ___ (2015) ( 375A14 ).

Justice HUDSON and Justice BEASLEY concur in part and dissent in part for

the reasons stated in Justice Hu dson’s opinion in Arnesen v. Rivers Edge Golf Club &
Plantation, Inc. ,

___ N.C. ___, ___ S.E.2d ___ (2015) ( 375A14 )

.
# C_2018337EN.01000101.xml

| 20.9.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 337/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.9.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 337/1

---

EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

2017-2018 SESSION

Sittings of 11 to 14 September 2017

The Minutes of this session have been published in

  OJ C 89, 8.3.2018
  .

TEXTS ADOPTED

---
Case: 2:12-cv-01184-EAS-EPD Doc #: 54 Filed: 11/15/13 Page: 1 of 1  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-08T10:11:15-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
% Food exposure

% Once daily oral exposure, dose from cpfs SS F13_49 foodonly exp distribution.csv 95th percentile % Female adult, Body weight set to 72.9 kg % Cecilia Tan % August 26, 2015

prepare @clear @all % Setting model parameters start @NoCallback use human_parameters_MRP use preg_female_parameters

BWSW=1; % Set to 1 if BWT is provided BWST=72.9; % Initial BW in kg PREG=0; % Not pregnant TSTOP= 1008; % Exposure duration in hrs

%Single oral daily exposure DT = xlsRead("Food.xls", "95p", "A1:A43"); % Dosing Times DORAL=xlsRead("Food.xls", "95p", "B1:B43"); % Dose in ug/kg prepare time rbcce cv urinetcpy start@nocallback

mytable = [_time _rbcce _urinetcpy _cv*350.6]; %unit of conc = ug/L save mytable @file='food_95.txt' @format=ascii
# C_2015302EN.01002602.xml

| 14.9.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 302/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.9.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 302/26

---

Action brought on 20 July 2015 — European Commission v Hungary

(Case C-392/15)

(2015/C 302/34)

Language of the case: Hungarian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: H. Støvlbæk and Talabér-Ritz K., acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Hungary

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Declare that Hungary has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 49 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union by making the exercise of the profession of notary public subject to a nationality requirement. |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare that Hungary has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 49 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union by making the exercise of the profession of notary public subject to a nationality requirement.

| — | Order Hungary to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order Hungary to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The Commission considers that a nationality requirement for the exercise of the profession of notary public is discriminatory and constitutes a disproportionate restriction on the freedom of establishment. Hungary has failed thereby to fulfil its obligations under Article 49 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

The Commission considers that the tasks conferred by Hungarian legislation on notaries public, by their nature, are not related to the exercise of the powers of a public authority, so that the derogation provided for in Article 51 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union cannot justify nationality as a requirement for access to the profession of notary public.

---