alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000101295
<NAME> UNITED-GUARDIAN, INC.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                       1,842,444
<SECURITIES>                                 1,088,173
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,197,301
<ALLOWANCES>                                    52,434
<INVENTORY>                                  1,169,110
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,610,507
<PP&E>                                       4,650,346
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,244,633
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,517,182
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          371,251
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       488,914
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,638,415
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,517,182
<SALES>                                      7,093,503
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,093,503
<CGS>                                        3,786,891
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,786,891
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 327
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,826,748
<INCOME-TAX>                                   681,400
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,145,348
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,145,348
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .23


</TABLE>
#### A. W. Fenton Co. *v.*United States

No. 7415.

Invoice dated London, England, May 17, 1946.

Certified May 17, 1946.

Entered at New York, N. Y., June 11, 1946.

Entry No. 767187.

(Decided October 22, 1947)

*Barnes, Richardson & Colburn (Hadley S. King*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Kincheloe, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
No. 53200.

#### Italian Crafts, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 53527-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-7460

ISAIAH T. FEASTER,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

KATHLEEN GREEN, Warden,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-05-

2367)

Submitted: March 30, 2006 Decided: April 6, 2006

Before TRAXLER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Isaiah T. Feaster, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Isaiah T. Feaster appeals the district court’s order

denying his petition for writ of error coram nobis. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Feaster v.

Green, No. CA-05-2367 (D. Md. Sept. 8, 2005). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
|   | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,  and |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  November      5, 2008 |  /s/      MICHAEL E. BATTEN          |
|----------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------|
|                                   | Michael      E. Batten                    |
|                                   | Chairman      and Chief Executive Officer |
# C_2015294EN.01003802.xml

| 7.9.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 294/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.9.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 294/38

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de commerce de Paris (France) lodged on 25 June 2015 — Eco-Emballages SA v Sphère France SAS, Schweitzer SAS, Carrefour Import SAS, Tissue France SCA, SCA Hygiène Products SAS, WEPA Troyes SAS, Industrie Cartarie Tronchetti SpA, Industrie Cartarie Tronchetti Ibérica, SL, Kimberly-Clark SAS, Gopack SAS, Delipapier, CMC France SARL, Paul Hartmann SA, Wepa Lille SAS, Industrie Cartarie Tronchetti France SAS, Melitta France SAS, Cofresco Frischhalteprodukte GmbH & Co. KG, Scamark SAS, Système U Centrale Nationale SAS

(Case C-313/15)

(2015/C 294/49)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunal de commerce de Paris

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Eco-Emballages SA

Applicant:

Defendants: Sphère France SAS, Schweitzer SAS, Carrefour Import SAS, Tissue France SCA, SCA Hygiène Products SAS, WEPA Troyes SAS, Industrie Cartarie Tronchetti SpA, Industrie Cartarie Tronchetti Ibérica, SL, Kimberly-Clark SAS, Gopack SAS, Delipapier, CMC France SARL, Paul Hartmann SA, Wepa Lille SAS, Industrie Cartarie Tronchetti France SAS, Melitta France SAS, Cofresco Frischhalteprodukte GmbH & Co. KG, Scamark SAS, Système U Centrale Nationale SAS

Defendants:

Question referred

Question referred

Does the concept of packaging, as defined in Article 3 of Directive 94/62/EC, amended by Directive 2004/12/EC (1), include ‘roll cores’ (rolls, tubes, cylinders) around which flexible material, such as paper or plastic film, is wound and sold to consumers?

1

---

(1)  Directive 2004/12/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 amending Directive 94/62/EC on packaging and packaging waste (OJ 2004 L 47, p. 26).

1

---
EXHIBIT 32.1
------------

                              UNITED-GUARDIAN, INC.
                    CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     I, Kenneth H. Globus,  President of United-Guardian,  Inc., hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of  United-Guardian,  Inc.
on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal  quarter ended March 31, 2007 fully  complies with
the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of
1934, and that information  contained in this Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all
material  respects  the  financial   condition  and  results  of  operations  of
United-Guardian, Inc.


Date:  May 8, 2007                       By: /s/ Kenneth H. Globus
                                             ---------------------
                                             Kenneth H. Globus
#### Abraham & Straus, Inc., et al. *v.*United States

No. 6424.

Entry No. 715307, etc.

Invoices dated London, England, October 1944, etc.

Certified October 1944, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., December 9, 1944, etc.

(Decided October 7, 1946)

*Siegel, Mandell & Davidson*for the plaintiffs.

*Paul P. Bao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Tilson, Judge:

The appeals listed in schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon a stipulation to the effect that the issues involved herein are similar in all material respects to the issues decided in *United States*v. *Pitcairn,*C. A. D. 334, and the record therein has been admitted in evidence in this case. .

Accepting this stipulation as a statement of fact, and following the cited authority, I find and hold the proper dutiable export values of the merchandise covered by these appeals to be the values found by the appraiser, less any amounts added under duress to meet advances made by the appraiser in similar cases then pending on appeal. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
# C_2016326EN.01001904.xml

| 5.9.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.9.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/19

---

Order of the President of the Third Chamber of the Court of 21 June 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof — Austria) — S, T v R

(Case C-492/15) (1)

1

(2016/C 326/34)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 398, 30.11.2015.

1

---
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 593 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 593

 Supporting the goals and ideals of National Children and Families Day 
 to encourage the adults of the United States to support and listen to 
  children and to help children throughout the United States achieve 
                        their hopes and dreams.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 29, 2006

    Mr. Allen (for himself and Mr. Warner) submitted the following 
 resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Health, Education, 
                          Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Supporting the goals and ideals of National Children and Families Day 
 to encourage the adults of the United States to support and listen to 
  children and to help children throughout the United States achieve 
                        their hopes and dreams.

Whereas the citizens of the United States celebrate National Children and 
        Families Day on the fourth Saturday of June;
Whereas research has shown that spending time together as a family is critical 
        to raising strong and resilient children;
Whereas strong and healthy families assist in the development of children;
Whereas strong and healthy families improve the quality of life of children;
Whereas it is essential for the adults of the United States to celebrate and 
        reflect upon--

    (1) the important role that all families play in the lives of children; 
and

    (2) the positive effect that strong and healthy children will have on 
the future of the United States; and

Whereas the greatest natural resource of the United States is the children of 
        the Nation: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) supports the goals and ideals of National Children and 
        Families Day; and
            (2) encourages the adults of the United States--
                    (A) to support, listen to, and encourage children 
                throughout the United States;
                    (B) to reflect upon the important role that all 
                families play in the lives of children; and
                    (C) to recognize that strong and healthy families--
                            (i) assist in the development of children; 
                        and
                            (ii) improve the quality of life of 
                        children.
                                 <all>
```
Document

Exhibit 10.2

AMENDMENT TO THE 
PIONEER BANCSHARES, INC.
2007 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN

WHEREAS, Pioneer Bancshares, Inc. sponsors and maintains the Pioneer Bancshares, Inc. 2007 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Plan”); and
WHEREAS, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of Pioneer Bank (the “Committee”) serves as the “Committee” under the Plan and has the authority under the terms of the Plan to amend the Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Committee desires to amend the Plan to allow NQSO’s (as defined in the Plan) under the Plan to be exercised pursuant to a net share cashless exercise.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Plan is hereby amended as follows, effective as of March 31, 2022:
1.Section 6(A) is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:
(A)    Medium and Time of Payment.  The Exercise Price shall be paid in full at the time the Option is exercised.  The Exercise Price shall be payable either by (i) United States dollars in cash or by check, Company draft, money order or wire transfer of good funds payable to the Company; (ii) upon conditions established by the Committee, by delivery of shares of Stock owned by the Participant for at least six (6) months prior to the date of exercise; (iii) if allowed under the terms of the applicable NQSO Stock Option Agreement, an election by the Participant to utilize a “net exercise,” such that the Participant may exercise the Option and the Company will reduce the number of shares of Stock issuable upon exercise by the largest whole number of shares with an aggregate Fair Market Value (on such date as is determined by the Committee) that does not exceed the aggregate Exercise Price; provided, however, that the Participant shall deliver cash or other payment acceptable to the Company to the extent of any remaining balance of the aggregate Exercise Price not satisfied by such reduction in the number of whole shares to be issued; or (iv) by a combination of (i), (ii) and (iii) (to the extent allowed under the terms of the applicable Stock Option Agreement).  A broker assisted exercise shall be deemed to be an exercise for cash under clause (i) of the preceding sentence.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this Amendment to be executed on this 28th day of March, 2022, effective for all purposes as provided above.
    Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of Pioneer Bank
    
    By:    /s/ Fran Wiatr        
        Committee Chair
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 77 (Monday, April 23, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 20139]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-7617]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-60,757]


Alan White Company; Shannon, Mississippi; Notice of Affirmative 
Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration

    By application dated April 5, 2007, a petitioner requested 
administrative reconsideration of the Department of Labor's Notice of 
Negative Determination Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker 
Adjustment Assistance, applicable to workers and former workers of the 
subject firm. The determination was issued on March 8, 2007 and 
published in the Federal Register on March 22, 2007 (72 FR 13528).
    The initial investigation resulted in a negative determination 
based on the finding that imports of upholstered furniture did not 
contribute importantly to worker separations at the subject firm and no 
shift of production to a foreign source occurred.
    The Department reviewed the request for reconsideration and has 
determined that the petitioner has provided additional information. 
Therefore, the Department will conduct further investigation to 
determine if the workers meet the eligibility requirements of the Trade 
Act of 1974.

Conclusion

    After careful review of the application, I conclude that the claim 
is of sufficient weight to justify reconsideration of the Department of 
Labor's prior decision. The application is, therefore, granted.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 12th of April, 2007.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E7-7617 Filed 4-20-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
Skip Links

USGS HomeContact USGSSearch USGS

Miscellaneous Investigations Series I-1420 (NJ-18)

About USGS /  Science Topics /  Maps, Products & Publications /  Education / Publication: FAQ

Pubs Warehouse

## Quaternary Geologic Map of the Chesapeake Bay 4°x 6° Quadrangle, United States

#### *Edited and integrated by* Gerald M. Richmond, David S. Fullerton, and David L. Weide*State compilations by* Emery T. Cleaves, John D. Glaser, Alan D. Howard, Gerald H. Johnson, Walter H. Wheeler, William D. Sevon, Sheldon Judson, James P. Owens, and Pamela C. Peebles

| This map is part of the Quaternary Geologic Atlas of the United States (I-1420). It was first published as a printed edition in 1987. The geologic data have now been captured digitally and are presented here along with images of the printed map sheet and component parts as PDF files.
*I-1420 (NJ-18)*Map PDF (3.5 MB)                    Right-Click to 'Save As' or 'Download'*I-1420 (NJ-18)*Map PDF (3.5 MB)                  Right-Click to 'Save As' or 'Download' | Version 1.0

Posted October 2006
- **Map** PDF (3.5 MB)
(This text-only version of the map is accessible as defined in Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, Amendments of 1998.)
- Readme  TXT (3 KB)
- Chesapeake Bay metadata  TXT (38 KB)
Download ZIP archives
- ArcInfo shapefiles (6 MB)
- ArcInfo exportfiles (5 MB)
- PDF files of map (9 MB) |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format (PDF); the latest version of Adobe Acrobat Reader or similar software is required to view it. Download the latest version of Acrobat Reader, free of charge or go to access.adobe.com for free tools that allow visually impaired users to read PDF files.

| AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and Notices                                                                                                                                                               |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| U.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological Survey      URL: https://pubsdata.usgs.gov/pubs/imap/i-1420/nj-18/Questions or Assistance: USGS Web ContactPage Last Modified: Wed Nov 30 17:34 EDT 2016 |  |

----
# C_2019295EN.01008301.xml

| 2.9.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 295/83 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.9.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 295/83

---

Action brought on 4 July 2019 — BPCE and Others v SRB

(Case T-489/19)

(2019/C 295/109)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: BPCE (Paris, France) and the 45 other applicants (represented by: A. Gosset-Grainville, M. Trabucchi and M. Dalon, lawyers)

Defendant: Single Resolution Board

Form of order sought

The applicants claim that the Court should:

| — | pursuant to Article 263 TFEU, annul Decision SRB/ES/SRF/2019/10 on the calculation of the 2019 ex-ante contributions to the Single Resolution Fund (SRF) in so far as it concerns the applicants; |
| --- | --- |

—

pursuant to Article 263 TFEU, annul Decision SRB/ES/SRF/2019/10 on the calculation of the 2019 ex-ante contributions to the Single Resolution Fund (SRF) in so far as it concerns the applicants;

| — | pursuant to Article 277 TFEU, declare the following provisions of the Single Resolution Mechanism Regulation (‘SRM Regulation’), the Implementing Regulation and the Delegated Regulation inapplicable:






  — | Article 69(2), Article 70(1) and Article 70(2)(a) and (b) of the SRM Regulation; |
| --- | --- | --- |

—

pursuant to Article 277 TFEU, declare the following provisions of the Single Resolution Mechanism Regulation (‘SRM Regulation’), the Implementing Regulation and the Delegated Regulation inapplicable:

—

Article 69(2), Article 70(1) and Article 70(2)(a) and (b) of the SRM Regulation;

| — | Article 4(2), Article 6, Article 7 and Article 10 of the Delegated Regulation and Annex I thereto; |
| --- | --- |

—

Article 4(2), Article 6, Article 7 and Article 10 of the Delegated Regulation and Annex I thereto;

| — | Article 4 and Article 8(5) of the Implementing Regulation; |
| --- | --- |

—

Article 4 and Article 8(5) of the Implementing Regulation;

| — | order the defendant to pay all the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay all the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicants rely on four pleas in law which are, in essence, identical or similar to those relied on in Case T-466/19, Société générale and Others v SRB.

---