alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### THE ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

Mr. Steven C. Whitworth Senior Director Environmental Policy and Ana lys is Ameren Corporation 1901 Chouteau Avenue, Me 1370 St. Louis , Missouri 63 I 03
Dear Mr. Whitworth: WASHI N G TON, D

. C. 20460

I am responding to the Ameren Corporation petition for reconsideration of the final action , titled

" Standard s of Performance for Greenhouse Gas Emissions from New, Modified , and Reconstructed Stationary Sources: E lectri c Utility Generating Units , " which was published in the 

### Federal Register on October 23 , 2015 (80 FR 645 1 0)

. Section 307( d)(7)(B) of the Clean Air Act sets forth the criteria for reconsideration. That section states that " [o]nly an objection to a rule or procedure whic h was raised with reasonable specificity during the period for public comment (including any public hearing) may be raised during judicial review. If the person raising an objection can demonstrate to the Admini strator that it was impractical to ra ise such objection within such time o r if the grounds for such objection arose after the period for public comment (but within the time specified for judicial review) and if such objection is of central relevance to the outcome of the rul e , the Administrator shall convene a proceeding for reconsideration of the rule and provid e the same procedural rights as would have been afforded had the information been avai lable at the time the rule was proposed." After careful cons id eration of the issues raised in the Am e ren Co rp oration petition, I deny the petition in it s entirety. None of the objections raised in the petition satisfy the c riteria for reconsideration set out in the final action , titled "Standards of Performance for Green hou se Gas Emiss ions from New , Modified , and Reconstructed section 307(d)(7)(B). " My reasons for this conclusion are fully set forth in an enclosed memorandum , "Bas is for Denial of Petitions to Reconsider the CAA Section 111 (b) Standards of Performance for Greenhouse Gas Emissions from New , Modified, and Reconstructed Fossil FuelFired Electric Utility Generating Units ," which is a lso available in the rulemaking dockets.

Enclosure

This paper i s pri n ted wit h vege table-o il -based i n ks and is 100·pe rcen t postco n su m er recyc led mater ial, ch lorine-free- p rocesse d and recyclable

.
Date: March 3 , 2015 Meeting : Shell- Metha n e Rule( s ) Disc u ssed: Wr itten Mater i als? Yes/N o Name O r gan izat i o n Phone N um be r 

# - fiJA 

# ~t'J- **~'flo&-** I 

# 'ID-

**--~ :lo**  "2. - 

# b
**l-C~** 

## - 

# q b 

# G:] ?.-0). 

## -J 'f

## J ']'73r(;
# C_2017046EN.01000401.xml

| 13.2.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 46/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.2.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 46/4

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 14 December 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal administratif — Luxembourg) — Maria Do Céu Bragança Linares Verruga, Jacinto Manuel Sousa Verruga, André Angelo Linares Verruga v Ministre de l’Enseignement supérieur et de la Recherche

(Case C-238/15) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Freedom of movement of persons - Equal treatment - Social advantages - Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 - Article 7(2) - Financial aid for higher education studies - Students not residing in the territory of the Member State concerned subject to the condition that they be the children of workers who have been employed or who have pursued their professional activity in that Member State for a continuous period of at least five years - Indirect discrimination - Justification - Objective of increasing the proportion of residents with a higher education degree - Whether appropriate - Proportionality))

(2017/C 046/04)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunal administratif

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Maria Do Céu Bragança Linares Verruga, Jacinto Manuel Sousa Verruga, André Angelo Linares Verruga

Applicants:

Defendant: Ministre de l’Enseignement supérieur et de la Recherche

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 7(2) of Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2011 on freedom of movement for workers within the Union must be interpreted as precluding legislation of a Member State, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which, with the aim of encouraging an increase in the proportion of residents with a higher education degree, makes the grant of financial aid for higher education studies to a non-resident student conditional on at least one of that student’s parents having worked in that Member State for a minimum and continuous period of five years at the time the application for financial aid is made, but which does not lay down such a condition in respect of a student residing in the territory of that Member State.

---

(1)  OJ C 254, 3.8.2015.

1

---
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# U.S. Customs Service, medals and ribbons program

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  U.S. Customs Service, medals and ribbons program 
                    -           Publisher        
                    -  U.S. Customs Service 
                    -           Subjects        
                    -  U.S. Customs Service 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1980-1990 
                    -           Series Title        
                    -  Customs poster series ; #77Customs poster series77. 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  146 × 36 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Ideal Contex Magnum G600 54 Plus at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at the University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  019933701.jpg; 019933701.jpg 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v RAYMOND E. SUMREL, Private First Class, U. S. Army, Appellant

8 USCMA 399, 24 CMR 209

No. 10,482

Decided November 8, 1957

*Colonel Edioard M. O’Connell*and *First Lieutenant William L. Garwood*were on the brief for Appellant, Accused.

; *Lieutenant Colonel John G. Lee*and *First Lieutenant Jay D. Fischer*were on the brief for Appellee, United States.

Opinion of the Court

Homer Ferguson, Judge;

In spite of his plea of not guilty, the accused was convicted of desertion for an unauthorized absence of five months germinated by surrender. The law officer, over defense objection, instructed the court that: “if the condition of ■absence without proper authority is much prolonged and there is no satisfactory- explanation of it, the court will be justified in inferring from that alone an intent to remain absent permanently.” Substantially the same instruction has been held prejudicially erroneous in United States v Cothern, 8 USCMA 158, 23 CMR 382, and United States v *400Burgess, 8 USCMA 168, 23 CMR 387. For the reasons expressed in those opinions, the accused’s conviction must be reversed. The record of trial is returned to The Judge Advocate General of the Army for reference to a board of review. The board may, in its discretion, approve the lesser offense of absence without leave and reassess the sentence or it may order a rehearing on the desertion charge.

Chief Judge Quinn concurs.

LatimeR, Judge

(concurring in the result) :

I concur in the result.

The rule in United States v Cothern, 8 USCMA 158, 23 CMR 382, United States v Burgess, 8 USCMA 163, 23 CMR 387, and allied cases, has been fixed. I believe that my separate opinions in those cases are a sufficient indication of my disapproval of that rule. However, further dissents would serve no useful purpose and so I accept the principle as the law of this Court.
AO 450 (Rev. 5/85) Judgment in a Civil Case

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

Eastern Division 

CHARLES McCOY,

Plaintiff,

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE

vs.

 CASE NO. C2-12-655

DAVID B. STOKES, JUDGE EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR.

MAGISTRATE JUDGE TERENCE P. KEMP

Defendant.

Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues have

been tried and the jury has rendered its verdict.

Decision by Court. A decision has been rendered by the Court without a hearing or trial.

Pursuant to the Opinion and Order filed October 25, 2012, JUDGMENT is hereby

entered DISMISSING this case.

Date: October 25, 2012 JOHN P. HEHMAN, CLERK

/S/ Andy F. Quisumbing 

(By) Andy F. Quisumbing

 Courtroom Deputy Clerk

Case: 2:12-cv-00655-JLG-TPK Doc #: 11 Filed: 10/25/12 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Case: 2:12-cv-01191-EAS-EPD Doc #: 52 Filed: 11/15/13 Page: 1 of 1  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-11T15:03:02-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
EX-31 Rule13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications.

 

 

I, Anthony Sfarra,certify that:

 

1. I have reviewedthis report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed inrespect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of the Wells FargoCommercial Mortgage Trust 2016-C32 (the "Exchange Act periodicreports");

 

2. Based on myknowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3. Based on myknowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required tobe provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is includedin the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4. Based on myknowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report underItem 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Actperiodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under theservicing agreements in all material respects; and

 

5. All of the reportson assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securitiesand their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance withservicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in thisreport in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except asotherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliancedescribed in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving thecertifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me bythe following unaffiliated parties:

 

National CooperativeBank, N.A., as NCB Master Servicer, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as SpecialServicer, National Cooperative Bank, N.A., as NCB Special Servicer, WilmingtonTrust, National Association, as Trustee, Pentalpha Surveillance LLC, asOperating Advisor, CoreLogic Commercial Real Estate Services, Inc., asServicing Function Participant, and National Tax Search, LLC, as ServicingFunction Participant.

 

 

 

Dated: March 20, 2018

 

 

/s/ Anthony Sfarra

 

 

President

(seniorofficer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
Date: California Environmental Protection Agency AIR RESOURCES BOARD Enclosure A Rules that were Adopted, Amended or Repealed by the Foll ow ing Air Pollution Control and Air Quality Management Districts and are Submitted as Revisions to the District Imperial County APCD San Diego APCD San Diego APCD Tehama County APCD Ventura County APCD Yolo-Solano AQMD Ca lifornia Sta te Impl e mentation Plan Rule Number 2 14 67.0 67.0.1

2.3c 74.15.1 1 .1 Date Adopted, Amended, Title or Repealed 5/12/15 Emission Reduction Credit (ERC) Banking (amended) 6/24/15 Arch itectural Coatings (repea led) 6/24/15 Arch itectura l Coati ng s (adopted) 9/1/1 5 New Source Review, New and Major Modified .So urces in th e Tuscan Buttes Nonattainment Area (adopted) 6/23/1 5 7/8/15 Boilers , Steam Generators, and Process Heaters (amended) Genera l Provisions and Definitions (amended)
# C_2016078EN.01001003.xml

| 29.2.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 78/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.2.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 78/10

---

Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 18 December 2015 — Court of Justice of the European Union v Luigi Marcuccio

(Case C-77/15 P) (1)

1

(2016/C 078/13)

Language of the case: Italian

The Vice-President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 138, 27.4.2015.

1

---
# C_2015155EN.01001901.xml

| 11.5.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 155/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.5.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 155/19

---

Appeal brought on 24 March 2015 by the European Commission against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) delivered on 20 January 2015 in Case T-111/12 Spain v Commission

(Case C-140/15 P)

(2015/C 155/21)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Appellant: European Commission (represented by: D. Recchia and S. Pardo Quintillán, acting as Agents)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: Kingdom of Spain

Other party to the proceedings:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The appellant claims that the Court should:

| — | set aside the judgment of the General Court of 20 January 2015 in Case T-111/12 Spain v Commission; |
| --- | --- |

—

set aside the judgment of the General Court of 20 January 2015 in Case T-111/12 Spain v Commission;

Spain

Commission

| — | refer the case back to the General Court for judgment; |
| --- | --- |

—

refer the case back to the General Court for judgment;

| — | order the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The appeal brought by the Commission concerns the judgment of the General Court of 20 January 2015 in Case T-111/12. In that judgment, the General Court annulled Commission Decision C(2011)9990 of 22 December 2011 reducing the assistance granted under the Cohesion Fund to certain projects.

T-111/12

C(2011)9990

The Commission relies, in support of its appeal, on two grounds of appeal. By its primary ground of appeal, the Commission claims that the General Court erred in law in finding that the Commission had to adopt the decision on financial corrections within a time-limit, which is determined by the basic act in force on the date of the hearing between the Commission and the Member State. In the alternative, the Commission claims that the General Court erred in law in finding that the time-limit imposed on the Commission for adopting the decision on financial corrections is a mandatory time-limit, non-observance of which constitutes an infringement of an essential procedural requirement that invalidates the decision adopted outside that time-limit.

By its primary ground of appeal

In the alternative

---
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 02851**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name 3**  **Description** x 

### 02851\02851_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook



### 02851\02851_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist x 

### 02851\02851_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 02851\02851_PartB.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 02851\02851_PartC.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 02851\02851_PartD.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 02851\02851_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file



### 02851\Certification Statement Plant ID 02851.pdf Plant certification statement x 

### 02851\Follow up\02851_Follow up_1.pdf Email communications regarding questions on the survey response x 

### 02851\Follow up\02851_Follow Up_2.pdf Email communications regarding questions on the survey response x 

### 02851\Follow up\ICRFollow up-02851.doc Email communications regarding questions on the survey response x 

### 02851\Supplemental Documents\02851_Ash pond flow diagram for ICR.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### 02851\Supplemental Documents\02851_coal pile runoff pond flow diagram for ICR.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### 02851\Supplemental Documents\02851_ICR waste water balance diagram.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey



### 02851\Supplemental Documents\02851_Plant Proper including ash pond marked up.jpg Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### 02851\Supplemental Documents\02851_Plant Proper to Lowell Dam.jpg Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### 02851\Supplemental Documents\02851_RIVERTON PLANT AERIAL WITH INFO copy.jpg Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

2Copyright documents are available from the docket. 1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database
. 3No hardcopy log is included for this plant as no hardcopy materials were received.
No. 53739.

protests 101367-K, etc. (Pembina).

#### Norman G. Jensen *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
# C_2016098EN.01001701.xml

| 14.3.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 98/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.3.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 98/17

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Zalaegerszegi Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság (Hungary) lodged on 15 June 2015 — EURO 2004. Hungary Kft v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Nyugat-dunántúli Regionális Vám- és Pénzügyőri Főigazgatósága

(Case C-291/15)

(2016/C 098/21)

Language of the case: Hungarian

Referring court

Referring court

Zalaegerszegi Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: EURO 2004. Hungary Kft

Applicant:

Defendant: Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Nyugat-dunántúli Regionális Vám- és Pénzügyőri Főigazgatósága

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Must Article 181a of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 of 2 July 1993 be interpreted as precluding a practice of a Member State whereby the customs value is determined on the basis of the ‘transaction value of similar goods’ if it is considered that the declared transaction value, in comparison with the statistical average of the purchase prices verified in the context of the importation of similar goods, is unreasonably low and, consequently, incorrect, despite the fact that the customs authority does not refute or call into question the authenticity of the invoice or the bank transfer certificate produced in order to establish the price actually paid for the imported goods, without the importer having submitted additional evidence to demonstrate the transaction value?

---
Exhibit 4.31
​
EXCLUSIVE LICENSE AGREEMENT RENEWAL
THIS RENEWAL OF THE EXCLUSIVE LICENSE AGREMEMENT (this “Renewal”) is made and entered into as of May 8, 2020, by and among Skinvisible, Inc., a Nevada corporation (referred to as “SKINVISIBLE” ), and Quoin Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Licensee”).
RECITALS
WHEREAS, the Parties have entered into the EXCLUSIVE LICENSE AGREEMENT dated October 17, 2019;
WHEREAS, the Parties hereby agree to renew and extend the EXCLUSIVE LICENSE AGREEMENT as follows:
	1.
	Section 7.0 License Fee.  As partial consideration for the rights conveyed by Skinvisible under this Agreement, Licensee agrees to pay to Skinvisible a one-time, non-refundable, non-creditable license issue fee of one million USD dollars (USD $1,000,000) (“License Fee”).  In the event that the Licensee’s initial funding event is equal to or greater than ten million USD (USD $10,000,000), the full License Fee shall be payable immediately upon the successful closing of the initial funding event.  In the event that any funding event is less than USD$ 10,000,000, Licensee will pay Skinvisible a non-refundable 10% of the net amount raised in any funding event until the full License Fee is paid, due no later than July 31, 2020.  This Agreement will automatically terminate if the License Fee is not paid by July 31, 2020.  Licensee agrees to hold bi-monthly update calls with Skinvisible on the status of funding until such time the full License Fee is paid.


	2.
	All other terms and conditions of the Exclusive License Agreement shall remain unchanged.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Amendment to be executed as of the date first above written.
	​


	​


	​



	​


	SKINVISIBLE, INC.



	​


	​



	​


	By:  


	/s/ Terry Howlett



	​


	Name:  


	Terry Howlett



	​


	Title:  


	President & Chief Executive Officer





​
	​


	​


	​



	​


	QUOIN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.



	​


	​



	​


	By:  


	/s/ Michael Myers



	​


	Name:  


	Michael Myers, Ph.D.



	​


	Title:  


	President & Chief Executive Officer





​