alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 53197.

#### Artmart Linen Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 146017-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
State Implementation Plan Revision: 2011 Base Year Inventory for

the Pennsylvania Portion of Five 2008 Ozone Nonattainment Areas:

Allentown - Bethlehem - Easton, Lancaster, Philadelphia - Wilmington - Atlantic City, Pittsburgh - Beaver Valley, Reading Appendices Appendix A: Point Sources Appendix A

- 1: 2011 Point Source Annual Inventory Appendix A

- 2: 2011 Point Source Ozone Season Inventory Appendix B: Nonpoint Sources Appendix B

- 1: 2011 Nonpoint Source Annual Inventory Appendix B

- 2: 2011 Nonpoint Source Ozone Season Inventory Appendix C: Nonroad Sources Appendix C

- 1: 2011 Nonroad Source Annual Inventory Appendix C

- 2: 2011 Nonroad Source Ozone Season Inventory Appendix D: Onroad Sources Appendix D

- 1: 2011 Onroad Source Annual Inventory Appendi x D
- 2: 2011 Onroad Source Ozone Season Inventory These appendices are emission inventory files in Microsoft EXCEL
. Many of these files have multiple tabs, some of which have thousands of entries. Because of the format of the se file s , they are not available for download from www.regulations.gov . Copies of the file s are available for public inspection at the EPA Region III address listed in the Federal Register Proposed Rule document. For further infor mation, EPA Regio n III's point of contact (POC) is listed in this docket.
**Order of the President of the General Court of 30 June 2010 – Victoria Sánchez v Parliament and Commission**

**(Case T-61/10 R)**

Application for interim measures – Disregard of formal requirements – Inadmissibility

1.                     *Application for interim measures – Formal requirements – Submission of applications – Brief summary of the pleas in law on
which the application is based – Pleas in law not set out in the application and pleadings – General reference to documents
– Inadmissibility (Arts 278 TFEU and 279 TFEU; Rules of Procedure of the General Court, Arts 44(1)(c) and 104(2) and (3))
(see paras 12, 14-18)*

2.                     *Application for interim measures – Suspension of operation of a measure – Interim measures – Conditions for granting – Prima
facie case – Urgency – Serious and irreparable damage – Cumulative nature (Arts 278 TFEU and 279 TFEU; Rules of Procedure
of the General Court, Art. 104(2)) (see para. 13)*

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | APPLICATION for interim measures to safeguard the applicant's physical safety, his fundamental rights and those of European citizens who might be affected. |

**Operative part**

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | The application for interim measures is dismissed. |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Costs are reserved. |
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 21, 2016

No. 04

- 15

- 00433

- CV

TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY & POST OAK CLEAN

GREEN, INC

. , Appellants

v.

GUADALUPE COUNTY GROUNDWATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT

, Appellee

From the 2nd 25th Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas

Trial Court No. 14

- 0863

- CV

Honorable W.C. Kirkendall, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

The panel has conside red the appellee ’ s motion for e xtension of time to file motion for

rehearing, and the motion is GRANTED. Time is extended to May 5, 2016.

____ _____________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 21st day of April, 2016

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Johnson, Dastina - Boise, ID

Subject: 'eNewsbytes' - Volunteers Lend Helping Hand to Idaho Wetlands Project 

Page 1 of 2

6/22/2007

 

Volunteers Lend Helping Hand to Idaho Wetlands Project

“It was our largest wetlands planting project to date, and we owe

much of our success to the volunteers.” Cleve Bagley, soil 

conservation technician with the Natural Resources Conservation 

Service (NRCS), was referring to a special team of young adults 

from Upper Valley Options, a rehabilitation center for adults with 

physiological and mental disabilities, and students from Brigham 

Young University-Idaho majoring in agriculture. They teamed up 

to assist NRCS in the planting of thousands of native wetlands 

plants on a Wetlands Reserve Project (WRP) in Rexburg, Idaho. 

 

The project surfaced when local landowner Byron Thomason 

contacted NRCS for assistance to convert his wet, marginal farmland into a permanent wetland. 

Thomason’s main priority was providing a home for wildlife habitat. Bagley assured him that the 

wetland would address wildlife habitat, filter out pollutants, control erosion and recharge ground 

water. However, to make it happen, they would need to plant 3,500 native plant species on 240 

acres of wet agricultural land. 

 

After learning about the project’s benefits to the environment and community, both teams 

enthusiastically volunteered to help. Once on site, they hopped out of their vans and went to work.

 

“We worked the whole gamut. We planted trees, laid down a weed mat over the trees, cut holes in 

the mat where trees were planted, and pulled trees through,” said Scott Birkinbine, President of 

Upper Valley Options. “My clients thought it was one of the neatest opportunities that they’d ever 

had. They can look back at the project years from now, and know that they had a part in it.” 

 

Although the weather was cold and stormy, 25 volunteers 

worked a total of 12 hours over a three-day period to 

complete the planting project in May. Bagley was 

impressed. “These volunteers have proved that sometimes 

the only thing that is needed for success is a helping hand.” 

 

For additional information on this project, contact Cleve 

Bagley, 208-356-5701.

 

All eNewsbytes are archived online at http://www.id.nrcs.usda.gov/news/ebytes.html for viewing 

anytime.
*** E.O. 12866 Review

– Do Not Cite, Quote or Release During Review ***



## Updated **NHTSA and EPA Responses to Interagency Line**  **Item Comments on H**  **DV Phase 2 NPRM Preamble Received** 

**on June 5**  **, 2015 NHTSA and EPA**  **Response :**  The agencies believe we have s ubstantivel y concurred with these interagency

recommended edits, with only minor editorial revisions for clarity . **Edits the Agencies Have**  **Confirmed are Present in the Current Preamble File**  **:** Page 46 : Deletion in the first bullet . Agencies have confirmed this deletion in the Preamble. Page 48: Add a request for comment . Agencies have confirmed that the Preamble now reads: “As discussed throughout this document, the agencies believe Alternative 4 has potential to be the maximum feasible alternative, however, based on the evidence currentl y before us, the agencies have outstanding questions regarding relative risks and benefits of that option in the timeframe envisioned. We are seeking comment on these relative risks and benefits. ” Page 219: EO12866 suggested e dits. Agencies have confirmed that the Preamble now reads: “ The agencies also regard these reductions as cost - effective, even without considering pay back period. The agencies estimate the cost per metric ton of CO2eq reduction without considering fuel savings to be $20 in 2030, and we estimate the cost per gallon of avoided fuel consumption to be about $0.25 per gallon, which compares favorably

with the levels of cost effectiveness the agencies found to be re asonable for light duty trucks. Footnote: “ If using a cost effectiveness metric that treats fuel savings as a negative cost, net costs per ton of GHG emissions reduced or per gallon of avoided fuel consumption would be negativ e under the proposed standards.” Page 219: EO12866 suggested edit s The Preamble reads: Alternative 3 is generally designed to achieve the levels of fuel consumption and GHG reduction that Alternative 4 would achieve, but with several ye ars of additional lead - time

– i.e., the Alternative 3 standards would end up in the same place as the Alternative 4 standards, but several ye ars later, meaning that manufacturers could, in theory , apply new technology

at a more gradual pace and with greater flexibility . H owever, Alternative 4 would provide earlier GHG benefits compared to Alternative 3. Page 848: T echnical edits to regulation .*** E.O. 12866 Review

– Do Not Cite, Quote or Release During Review ***

Agencies have confirmed that the Regulation text in §1068.301 now reads: “ (d) Complete the appropriate EPA declaration form bef ore importing any engines or equipment. These forms may be submitted and stored electronicall y and are available on the Internet at http://www.epa.gov/OTAQ/imports/ or by phone at 734 - 214 - 4100. Importers must keep the forms these records for five years and make them available promptl y upon request. ”
EXHIBIT 99.1


                                  CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
           AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Richard R. Erkeneff, as Chief Executive Officer of United Industrial
Corporation (the "Company") certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

          (1)       the accompanying Form 10-Q report for the period ended March
                    31, 2003 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange
                    Commission (the "Report") fully complies with the
                    requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
                    Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

          (2)       the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                    all material respects, the financial condition and results
                    of operations of the Company.


Date: May 14, 2003                           /s/ Richard R. Erkeneff
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Richard R. Erkeneff
                                             Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



                                       27
No. 56154.

protests 161454-K, etc. (New York).

#### L. Batlin & Son, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
Exhibit
      32




**UNISOURCE
      ENERGY CORPORATION**




**TUCSON
      ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY**







**STATEMENTS
      OF CORPORATE OFFICERS**


(Pursuant
      to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)










Each
      of the
      undersigned, James S. Pignatelli, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief
      Executive Officer of UniSource Energy Corporation and Tucson Electric Power
      Company (each a “Company”), and Kevin P. Larson, Vice President, Treasurer and
      Chief Financial Officer of each Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that each Company’s Quarterly Report on
      Form 10-Q for the three months ended June 30, 2006, fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended, and that the information contained therein fairly presents,
      in
      all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      such
      Company.






August
      8,
      2006





/s/
                James S.
                PignatelliJames
                S.
                Pignatelli
              Chairman
                of
                the Board, President and
              Chief
                Executive Officer
              UniSource
                Energy Corporation
              Tucson
                Electric Power Company/s/
                Kevin P.
                LarsonKevin
                P.
                Larson
              Senior
                Vice
                President, Treasurer and
              Chief
                Financial Officer
              UniSource
                Energy Corporation
              Tucson
                Electric Power
                Company
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

LEONARDO GUTIERREZ,

Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES,

Appellee.

No. 4D16-4042

[October 5, 2017]

Appeal from the State of Florida, Department of Financial 

Services; L.T. Case No. 187898-16-AG.

Howard J. Hochman, Miami, for appellant.

Matthew R. Daley, Assistant General Counsel, and Gregory D. Venz, 

Deputy General Counsel, Tallahassee, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

TAYLOR, MAY and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Exhibit 10.8


 


AMENDMENT TO REVOLVING LOAN AND SECURITY
AGREEMENT


 


This Amendment (the
“Amendment”) to the Revolving Loan and Security Agreement dated April 28, 2011, as amended on July 26, 2014 and October
31, 2017 (the “Agreement”) is entered into this 31st day of January 2021, by and between Vaxstar LLC, a Delaware limited
liability company (“Vaxstar”), and Netcapital Inc. (“Netcapital”), a Utah corporation, with reference to the
following:


 


READINGS/RECITALS


 


A.      The
Agreement, as amended, contains a maturity date of April 30, 2021, and Netcapital and Vaxstar desire to extend the maturity date
to a time in the future.


 


B.       Both
parties seek to amend the Agreement.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, in
consideration of the foregoing, of the mutual promises hereinafter set forth and for other good and valuable consideration, the
receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:


 


Paragraph 9 (k) of the Agreement is amended
to read: 


“Maturity Date” means April
30, 2022.


 


COUNTERPARTS: This Amendment may be executed
simultaneously in one or more counterparts, each of which when executed and delivered shall be deemed an original, but all of which
together shall constitute a single agreement.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto
have entered into this Amendment as of the date written above.


 


	Vaxstar LLC	 
	 	 	 
	Signature:		 
	 	Manuek Teixeira, Manager	 
	 	 	 
	ValueSetters, Inc	 
	 	 	 
	Signature:		 
	 	Cecilia Lenk, CEO
# Official Journal L 383/28 D

| | ISSN 1725-2555 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 383 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 4728 December 2004 |

ISSN 1725-2555

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 383

English edition

Legislation

Volume 4728 December 2004

---

| Contents | | II   Acts whose publication is not obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | European Parliament |
| | * | 2004/886/EC, Euratom:Final Adoption of amending budget No 7 of the European Union for the financial year 2004 | 1 |
| | * | 2004/887/EC, Euratom:Final Adoption of amending budget No 8 of the European Union for the financial year 2004 | 21 |
| | * | 2004/888/EC, Euratom:Final Adoption of amending budget No 9 of the European Union for the financial year 2004 | 51 |

Contents

II   Acts whose publication is not obligatory

page

European Parliament

*

2004/886/EC, Euratom:Final Adoption of amending budget No 7 of the European Union for the financial year 2004

1

*

2004/887/EC, Euratom:Final Adoption of amending budget No 8 of the European Union for the financial year 2004

21

*

2004/888/EC, Euratom:Final Adoption of amending budget No 9 of the European Union for the financial year 2004

51

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
No. 62054.

#### E. C. Carter & Son, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 312838-K, 319308-K, and 324075-K (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items of the merchandise are the same in all material respects as those the subject *595of *E. C. Carter & Son, Inc.*v. *United States*(38 Cust. Ct. 368, C. D. 1889), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
# C_2018301EN.01002701.xml

| 27.8.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 301/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.8.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 301/27

---

Judgment of the General Court of 11 July 2018 — ClientEarth v Commission

(Case T-644/16) (1)

((Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Commission documents relating to the compatibility with EU law of Investor-State Dispute Settlement and the Investment Court System in EU trade agreements - Partial refusal of access - Exception concerning the protection of the public interest as regards international relations - Exception concerning the protection of legal advice - Exception concerning the protection of the decision-making process - Overriding public interest))

(2018/C 301/34)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: ClientEarth (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: O. Brouwer, lawyer, and N. Frey, Solicitor)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: F. Clotuche-Duvieusart and J. Baquero Cruz, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of Commission Decision C(2016) 4286 final of 1 July 2016, refusing access to certain documents relating to the compatibility with EU law of Investor-State Dispute Settlement and the Investment Court System in EU trade agreements.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders ClientEarth to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders ClientEarth to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 402, 31.10.2016.

---
110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 117

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas the founding of the colony at Jamestown, Virginia, 

in 1607, the first permanent English colony in America, 

and the capital of Virginia for 92 years, has major significance in the history of the United States; 

Whereas the Jamestown Settlement owed its survival in large 

measure to the compassion and aid of the Native people 

in its vicinity;
2

•HCON 117 EH 

Whereas Native Virginia people substantially aided the 

Jamestown colonists with food and supplies at times that 

were crucial to their survival; 

Whereas the Native people served as guides to geography and 

natural resources, crucial assistance in the Virginia colonists’ exploration of the Chesapeake Region; 

Whereas the Jamestown Settlement brought people from 

throughout the Atlantic Basin together to form a society 

that drew upon the strengths and characteristics of 

English, European, African, and Native American cultures; 

Whereas the economic, political, religious, and social institutions that developed during the first 9 decades of the existence of Jamestown continue to have profound effects 

on the United States, particularly in English common law 

and language, cross cultural relationships, manufacturing, and economic structure and status; 

Whereas the National Park Service, the Association for the 

Preservation of Virginia Antiquities, and the JamestownYorktown Foundation of the Commonwealth of Virginia 

collectively own and operate significant resources related 

to the early history of Jamestown; 

Whereas, in 2000, Congress established the Jamestown 400th 

Commemoration Commission to ensure a suitable national observance of the Jamestown 2007 anniversary, 

and Congress commends the Commission’s hard work 

and dedication; 

Whereas Congress reminds all Americans of the importance 

of their country’s history and founding at Jamestown; 

and 
3

•HCON 117 EH 

Whereas the 2007 observance of the founding of Jamestown 

commemorates the 400th anniversary of the first permanent English colony in America: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That Congress commemorates the 400th An3 niversary of the founding of the colony Jamestown in 1607 

4 and urges all Americans to honor this seminal event in 

5 our Nation’s history. 

Passed the House of Representatives May 8, 2007. 

Attest:

Clerk. 
110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 117

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Commemorating the 400th Anniversary of the 

settlement of Jamestown.
EXHIBIT 11 -  Computation of Earnings Per Share


Item 6(a)
Exhibit 11
Computation of Earnings per Share
United Industrial Corporation and Subsidiaries


                                                 THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31 
                                                 --------------------------- 

                                                    1999            1998  
                                                  --------        --------


Net income                                        $ 2,314,000   $ 2,323,000
                                                  ===========   ===========
                                                  
Basic earnings per share:                         
         Weighted average shares                   12,258,713    12,254,363
                                                  ===========   ===========
                                                  
Effect of dilutive securities:                    
         Employee stock options                   $   226,297   $   344,542
                                                  ===========   ===========
                                                  
Diluted earnings per share:                       
         Adjusted weighted-average                
         and assumed conversions                   12,485,010    12,598,905
                                                  ===========   ===========
Basic earnings per share                                $ .19         $ .19
                                                        =====         =====
Diluted earnings per share                              $ .19         $ .18
                                                        =====         =====
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



                                       13