alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsResults of the integration of a transonic full-potential analysis program with a free-wake lifting-line program for hovering rotorsThe hovering performance predictions of the TFAR1 and OPLIN codes and the experimental data are discussed. The TFAR1 program solves the full-potential equation in a rotor-fixed coordinate system by use of the line relaxation method. The OPLIN program calculates the positions of wake vortices and rotor performance using the influence-coefficient-and-lifing-line method. The two programs are combined by adding the induced velocities from the OPLIN code to the near flow-field of the rotor from the TFAR1 code. Results show that the TFAR1 program converges better with the downwash-coupling method than the twist correction method to include the wake downwash.Document ID19870013198Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsChung, Song-Young*(NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateMay 1, 1987Subject CategoryAerodynamicsReport/Patent NumberA-87193NASA-TM-89494NAS 1.15:89494Accession Number87N22631Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-61-51Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19870013198.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Exhibit 32

Certification Pursuant to
Exchange Act Rule 15d-14(b) and
18 U.S.C. Section 1350

I, Gordon R. Arnold, certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, that:

i.  The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Sierra Monitor Corporation for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009  fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and;

ii. The information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Sierra Monitor Corporation and will be retained by Sierra Monitor Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Date:

August 13, 2009

By:    /s/ Gordon R. Arnold

Gordon R. Arnold

Chief Executive Officer

Chief Financial Officer



Page 21 of 21
III 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 577 

Designating September 24, 2006, as ‘‘National Good Neighbor Day’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 20, 2006 

Mr. BAUCUS (for himself, Mr. BURNS, and Mr. BYRD) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating September 24, 2006, as ‘‘National Good 

Neighbor Day’’. 

Whereas our society has developed highly effective means of 

speedy communication around the world, but has failed 

to ensure meaningful communication among people living 

across the globe, or even across the street, from one another; 

Whereas the endurance of human values and consideration 

for others are critical to the survival of civilization; and 

Whereas being good neighbors to those around us is the first 

step toward human understanding: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates September 24, 2006, as ‘‘Na3 tional Good Neighbor Day’’; and 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 577 ATS 

1 (2) calls on the people of the United States and 

2 interested groups and organizations to observe Na3 tional Good Neighbor Day with appropriate cere4 monies and activities. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
No. 54869.

#### Bludworth Marine and S. S. Sarna *v.*United States,

protests 149724-K and 151013-K (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

The protests were dismissed.
EXHIBIT 32.2
------------

                              UNITED-GUARDIAN, INC.
                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of  United-Guardian,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form  10-QSB for the  quarter  June 30,  2006,  as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kenneth
H. Globus, President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

        (1) the Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)the  information  contained  in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


Date:  August 10, 2006                    /s/ Kenneth H. Globus
                                          --------------------------
                                          Kenneth H. Globus
                                          President and Chief Financial Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO.: 2:13-CR-161

JUDGE SMITH

MAGISTRATE JUDGE DEAVERS

MARIO MORALES-MONZALVO, 

Defendant.

ORDER

On July 30, 2013, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), recommending that the Court accept Defendant’s plea of guilty to an

Information charging him with illegal reentry of a removed alien in violation of 8 U.S.C. §1326(a). 

Defendant, represented by counsel, waived his right to appear on the matter before a District Judge. 

The Magistrate Judge conducted the colloquy required by Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal

Procedure. Defendant’s plea was knowing, voluntary, free from coercion, and had a basis in fact. 

Defendant was specifically informed of his right to contest the Report and Recommendation

by filing any objections within 14 days of the issuance of the Report and Recommendation pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(B) and Rule 72(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Defendant did

not file any objections. 

Case: 2:13-cr-00161-GCS Doc #: 22 Filed: 08/29/13 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation and ACCEPTS

Defendant’s plea of guilty to the Information. Defendant is hereby adjudged guilty of illegal reentry

of a removed alien. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 /s/ George C. Smith 

GEORGE C. SMITH, JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

-2-

Case: 2:13-cr-00161-GCS Doc #: 22 Filed: 08/29/13 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
# C_2007231EN.01000401.xml

| 3.10.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 231/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.10.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 231/4

---

Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations (1):

1

4,27 % on 1 October 2007

Euro exchange rates (2)

2

2 October 2007

(2007/C 231/05)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,4165 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 163,92 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4546 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,69380 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2163 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,6646 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 87,52 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,6965 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5842 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,495 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 251,30 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7036 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,7692 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,3574 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 33,955 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,7126 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5972 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4122 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,9953 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8619 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0995 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 294,40 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,7728 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,6324 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3045 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 876,69 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,8239 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 63,544 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 35,3250 |
| THB | Thai baht | 44,969 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,4165

JPY

Japanese yen

163,92

DKK

Danish krone

7,4546

GBP

Pound sterling

0,69380

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2163

CHF

Swiss franc

1,6646

ISK

Iceland króna

87,52

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,6965

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5842

CZK

Czech koruna

27,495

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

251,30

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7036

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,7692

RON

Romanian leu

3,3574

SKK

Slovak koruna

33,955

TRY

Turkish lira

1,7126

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5972

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4122

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,9953

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8619

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0995

KRW

South Korean won

1 294,40

ZAR

South African rand

9,7728

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,6324

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3045

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 876,69

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,8239

PHP

Philippine peso

63,544

RUB

Russian rouble

35,3250

THB

Thai baht

44,969

---

(1)

1

Rate applied to the most recent operation carried out before the indicated day. In the case of a variable rate tender, the interest rate is the marginal rate.

(2)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

2

Source:

---
SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT OF


TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION





I, Cindy Wang, certify that:





(a) A review of Toyota Motor Credit Corporation’s activities
      and of its performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of March 2, 2016 (the “Sale and Servicing Agreement”), among Toyota Auto Finance Receivables LLC, as seller, Toyota Motor Credit Corporation, as servicer (in such capacity, the
      “Servicer”) and sponsor, and Toyota Auto Receivables 2016-A Owner Trust, as issuer, during the year ended December 31, 2018 has been made under my supervision.





(b) To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the
      Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the aforementioned period.





March 21, 2019





By:  /s/ Cindy Wang


Cindy Wang


Group Vice President - Treasury


Toyota Motor Credit Corporation, as Servicer of Toyota Auto Receivables 2016-A Owner Trust
* District Judge for the Eastern District of Texas, sitting by

designation. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________ No. 91-3766

_____________________ BETTY U. CHIASSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,
VERSUS ZAPATA GULF MARINE CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee.

________________________________________________ Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana

________________________________________________

(September 17, 1993)
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion 03/31/93, 5 Cir., 1993, 988 F.2d 513)

Before JONES, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges, and JUSTICE * , District Judge.
PER CURIAM:
The Petition for Rehearing is DENIED and no member of this panel nor Judge in regular active service on the Court having requested that the Court be polled on rehearing en banc, (Federal
Rules of Appellate Procedure and Local Rule 35) the Suggestion for Rehearing En Banc is DENIED
. Petitioner and amici read our opinion
too broadly. We simply hold that the surveillance evidence should
have been disclosed during discovery because it was not used solely for impeachment as the local rule requires. The impeaching value
of the evidence was minimal, whereas the evidence was probative ona c entral substantive issue in the case -- plaintiff's physical

condition.
# C_2015221EN.01000401.xml

| 6.7.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 221/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.7.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 221/4

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Simvoulio tis Epikratias (Greece) lodged on 29 April 2015 — Anonimi Geniki Etairia Tsimenton Iraklis (AGET Iraklis) v Ipourgos Ergasias, Kinonikis Asfalisis kai Kinonikis Allilengiis

(Case C-201/15)

(2015/C 221/05)

Language of the case: Greek

Referring court

Referring court

Simvoulio tis Epikratias

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Anonimi Geniki Etairia Tsimenton Iraklis (AGET Iraklis)

Applicant:

Defendant: Ipourgos Ergasias, Kinonikis Asfalisis kai Kinonikis Allilengiis

Defendant:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Is a national provision, such as Article 5(3) of Law No 1387/1983, which lays down as a condition in order for collective redundancies to be effected in a specific undertaking that the administrative authorities must authorise the redundancies in question on the basis of criteria as to (a) the conditions in the labour market, (b) the situation of the undertaking and (c) the interests of the national economy compatible with Directive 98/59/EC (1) in particular and, more generally, Articles 49 TFEU and 63 TFEU? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Is a national provision, such as Article 5(3) of Law No 1387/1983, which lays down as a condition in order for collective redundancies to be effected in a specific undertaking that the administrative authorities must authorise the redundancies in question on the basis of criteria as to (a) the conditions in the labour market, (b) the situation of the undertaking and (c) the interests of the national economy compatible with Directive 98/59/EC (1) in particular and, more generally, Articles 49 TFEU and 63 TFEU?

1

| 2. | If the answer to the first question is in the negative, is a national provision with the aforementioned content compatible with Directive 98/59/EC in particular and, more generally, Articles 49 TFEU and 63 TFEU if there are serious social reasons, such as an acute economic crisis and very high unemployment? |
| --- | --- |

2.

If the answer to the first question is in the negative, is a national provision with the aforementioned content compatible with Directive 98/59/EC in particular and, more generally, Articles 49 TFEU and 63 TFEU if there are serious social reasons, such as an acute economic crisis and very high unemployment?

---

(1)  Council Directive 98/59/EC of 20 July 1998 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to collective redundancies (OJ 1998 L 225, p. 16).

1

---
Adams, Kevin (OST) 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Subject: 

Mr. Adams, 

Hyde, Vernon G <Vghyde@anthc.org> 

Wednesday, June 26, 2013 9:20 PM 

Adams, Kevin (OST) 

Reeve Air Alaska. 

I am writing in regards for a formal recommendation for Mike Reeve with Reeve Air Alaska. 

I am a construction manager with the Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium (ANTHC) and our company is tasked with 

building infrastructure throughout rural Alaska relating mainly with water, sewer and medical facilities. 

We have used Reeve Air Alaska to provide flights in construction and maintenance projects in the Prince William Sound 

communities as well as many other communities throughout the rest of the state. We regularly use Reeve Air for 

Anchorage-Chenega Bay-Tatitlek-Anchorage for passenger and also freight. 

I fully endorse Reeve Air to provide an excellent service to Tatitlek. 

Vern H!lde 

Construction Manager 

Alasba Native Tribal Health Consortium 

3900 Ambassador Dr. Suite 301 

Anchorage, AK 99508 

907-729-5694 

Fax: 907-729·3728 

1
#### Winston BRYANT, Attorney General v. ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

CA 93-210

870 S.W.2d 775

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Opinion delivered February 23, 1994

*Winston Bryant,*Att’y Gen., by: *Suzanne Autley,*Asst. Att’y Gen., for appellant.

*George Vena,*for appellee PSC.

*Gary Wann,*for appellee Southwestern Bell.

Per Curiam.

The Arkansas Public Service Commission (Commission) and Southwestern Bell Telephone Company (Southwestern Bell) filed a joint motion with this court to dismiss the Attorney General’s appeal of Order No. 4 of the Arkansas Public Service Commission. In Order No. 4, the Commission held that it was in the public interest to allow Southwestern Bell to offer Caller-ID service in the Arkadelphia and West Memphis *48areas for a one-year trial period. The Commission also ordered Southwestern Bell to take affirmative action prior to the expiration of the trial period to either continue or discontinue the Caller-ID service. The Attorney General appealed from this order, contending the Commission’s establishment of a one-year trial period for Caller-ID service was not supported by substantial evidence. Subsequent to the filing of the Attorney General’s appeal, the Commission by an order in another docket approved permanent Caller-ID service, and the one-year trial period expired. As a result of these occurrences, the Commission and Southwestern Bell have moved to dismiss the Attorney General’s appeal of Order No. 4, contending’ that his appeal is now moot. We agree.

The only action the Commission took in Order No. 4 was to establish a one-year trial period for Caller-ID service. That trial period has now expired, and therefore, any rulings this Court might make in regard to Order No. 4 would have no effect. It is the duty of the court to decide actual controversies by a judgment which can be carried into effect and not give opinions upon abstract propositions or declare principles of law which cannot affect the matter in issue. *Netherton*v. *Baldor Electric Co.,*232 Ark. 940, 942, 341 S.W.2d 57 (1960). An issue is moot when it has no legal effect on an existing controversy; *Killam*v. *Texas Oil and Gas Corp.,*303 Ark. 547, 556-57, 798 S.W.2d 419 (1990); it is one in which a decision of the court on appeal could not afford the appellant any relief. *Dotson*v. *Ritchie,*211 Ark. 789, 795, 202 S.W.2d 603 (1947).

We also note that, in earlier pleadings filed in this appeal, the Attorney General stated that his appeal would be moot at the end of the trial period. A party litigant is bound by his own pleadings and cannot maintain a position inconsistent therewith. *International Harvester Co.*v. *Burks Motor, Inc.,*252 Ark. 816, 821, 481 S.W.2d 351 (1972).

Accordingly, the joint motion of the Commission and Southwestern Bell is granted, and the appeal of the Attorney General is dismissed.
122 STAT. 656 PUBLIC LAW 110–198—MAR. 24, 2008 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 2733: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 154 (2008): 

Mar. 7, considered and passed Senate. 

Mar. 11, 12, considered and passed House. 

Æ 

Public Law 110–198 

110th Congress 

An Act 

To temporarily extend the programs under the Higher Education Act of 1965. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Higher Education Extension 

Act of 2008’’. 

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF PROGRAMS. 

Section 2(a) of the Higher Education Extension Act of 2005 

(Public Law 109–81; 20 U.S.C. 1001 note) is amended by striking 

‘‘March 31, 2008’’ and inserting ‘‘April 30, 2008’’. 

SEC. 3. RULE OF CONSTRUCTION. 

Nothing in this Act, or in the Higher Education Extension 

Act of 2005 as amended by this Act, shall be construed to limit 

or otherwise alter the authorizations of appropriations for, or the 

durations of, programs contained in the amendments made by the 

Higher Education Reconciliation Act of 2005 (Public Law 109– 

171) or by the College Cost Reduction and Access Act (Public 

Law 110–84) to the provisions of the Higher Education Act of 

1965 and the Taxpayer-Teacher Protection Act of 2004. 

Approved March 24, 2008. 

20 USC 1001 

note. 

Higher Education 

Extension Act 

of 2008. 

20 USC 1001 

note. 

Mar. 24, 2008 

[S. 2733] 


dkrause on GSDDPC29 with PUBLIC LAWS
# Official Journal C 83/2022

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 83 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6521 February 2022 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 83

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6521 February 2022

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2022/C 83/01 | Euro exchange rates — 18 February 2022 | 1 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2022/C 83/01

Euro exchange rates — 18 February 2022

1

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2022/C 83/02 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10566 – P66/H2 EE/JV) – Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 2 |
| | OTHER ACTS |
| | European Commission |
| 2022/C 83/03 | Publication of an application for approval of an amendment, which is not minor, to a product specification pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs | 4 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2022/C 83/02

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10566 – P66/H2 EE/JV) – Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

2

OTHER ACTS

European Commission

2022/C 83/03

Publication of an application for approval of an amendment, which is not minor, to a product specification pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs

4

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN