alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7232

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

GLENDA MARIE PORTER,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert D. Potter, Senior

District Judge. (CR-93-149-P, CA-97-223-P)

Submitted: December 11, 1997 Decided: December 31, 1997

Before HALL and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Glenda Marie Porter, Appellant Pro Se. Harry Thomas Church, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997).

We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. United States v. Porter, Nos. CR-93-149-P; CA-97-223-P

(W.D.N.C. Aug. 15, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
Filed by sedaredgar.com - Exploration Drilling International Inc. - Exhibit 10.20






(Euro 90,000)

Addendum to the loan agreement dated 02/03/2006 

Extension 

LOAN AGREEMENT

between

DTB Patente GmbH 
Represented by Managing Director

Rainer Rotthäuser 
Goethestrasse 59, 45721 Haltern am See

     - in the following referred to as
lender -

and

EDI Exploration Drilling International GmbH, 
represented by
the Managing Director 
Günter Thiemann 
Goethestrasse 59, 45721 Haltern am
See

- in the following referred to as borrower -

Effective immediately, the loan agreement, to which this
addendum applies, is changed in § 2 paragraphs 2 and 3 as follows:

§ 2 Interest, term and repayment of loan

	 	1. 	
      The interest payable on the loan shall be 6.0 percent
      p.a.

	 	2. 	
      The term shall be extended by 9 10
      months and ends on 31/12/2008.

	 	3. 	
      The loan shall be repaid on 31/12/2008 into the lender’s
      account.



All other provisions of the agreement shall remain unchanged
and valid.

Haltern, 28/02/2008

	  	 	[Signature] 
	  	 	  
	DTB Patente GmbH 	 	EDI Exploration Drilling International GmbH
  
	- Lender - 	 	- Borrower - 


[File name]
GAAY REnT GOLAN ScaNcr COURS
# C_2007240EN.01000301.xml

| 12.10.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 240/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.10.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 240/3

---

Initiation of proceedings

(Case COMP/M.4726 — Thomson Corporation/Reuters Group)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 240/02)

On 8 October 2007, the Commission decided to initiate proceedings in the above-mentioned case after finding that the notified concentration raises serious doubts as to its compatibility with the common market. The initiation of proceedings opens a second phase investigation with regard to the notified concentration, and is without prejudice to the final decision on the case. The decision is based on Article 6(1)(c) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their observations on the proposed concentration to the Commission.

In order to be fully taken into account in the procedure, observations should reach the Commission not later than 15 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax ((32-2) 296 43 01 or 296 72 44) or by post, under reference number COMP/M.4726 — Thomson Corporation/Reuters Group, to the following address:

| Commission of the European Communities |
| --- |
| Competition DG |
| Merger Registry |
| Rue Joseph II/Jozef II-straat 70 |
| B-1000 Brussels |

Commission of the European Communities

Competition DG

Merger Registry

Rue Joseph II/Jozef II-straat 70

B-1000 Brussels

---
# C_2016343EN.01001601.xml

| 19.9.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 343/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.9.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 343/16

---

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 7 July 2016 — Panasonic Corp. v MT Picture Display Co. Ltd, European Commission

(Case C-608/15 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - Rules of Procedure of the Court - Article 181 - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Global market for cathode ray tubes for television sets and computer monitors - Agreements and concerted practices on pricing, market-sharing, customer-allocation and output-limitation - Rights of the defence - Statement of objections - Content))

(2016/C 343/24)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Panasonic Corp. (represented by: R. Gerrits, advocaat, M. Hoskins QC, and M. Gray, Barrister)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: MT Picture Display Co. Ltd, European Commission (represented by: A. Biolan and V. Bottka, acting as Agents)

Other parties to the proceedings:

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

| 2. | Panasonic Corp. shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Panasonic Corp. shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 27, 25.1.2016.

1

---
| (logo)  WELLS FARGO | **Commercial  Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084,  8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|---------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

ReferenceisherebymadetothatcertainPoolingandServicingAgreementdatedasof February 1, 2016, by and among BANC OF AMERICA MERRILL LYNCH COMMERCIALMORTGAGEINC.,asDepositor,WELLSFARGOBANK,NATIONALASSOCIATION,asMaster Servicer,C-III ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC, as Special Servicer, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONALASSOCIATION as Certificate Administrator, U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, asTrustee, PARK BRIDGE LENDER SERVICES LLC, as Operating Advisor and PARK BRIDGELENDER SERVICES LLC, as Asset Representations Reviewer with respect toCommercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2016-C28 (the"Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise definedshall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 11.09 of theAgreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial MortgageServices do hereby certify that:

 

1.A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period fromJanuary 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017 (the “Reporting Period”), and of itsperformance per the Agreement during such period has been made under mysupervision,and

 

2.To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer hasfulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respectsthroughout the ReportingPeriod.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned hasexecuted this Certificate as of the 28th day ofFebruary2018.

 

/s/ Daniel Bober

Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President

Wells Fargo Bank

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank,  N.A. | (logo)  Together we’ll go far |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO.: 2:13-cr-015

JUDGE SMITH

MAGISTRATE JUDGE KEMP

JAMES D. EVANS, 

Defendant.

ORDER

On February 20, 2013, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), recommending that the Court accept the Defendant’s guilty plea to Count

I of the Information charging him with Possession of a Firearm by an Unlawful User of Scheduled

Drugs, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(3) and 924(a)(2). Defendant, represented by counsel,

waived his right to appear on the matter before a District Judge. The Magistrate Judge conducted

the colloquy required by Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. Defendant’s plea was

knowing, voluntary, free from coercion, and had a basis in fact. 

Defendant was specifically informed of his right to contest the Report and Recommendation

by filing any objections within 14 days of the issuance of the Report and Recommendation pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(B) and Rule 72(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Defendant did

not file any objections. 

Case: 2:13-cr-00015-GCS Doc #: 12 Filed: 03/13/13 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation and ACCEPTS

Defendant’s plea of guilty to the Information. Defendant is hereby adjudged guilty of possession

of a firearm by an unlawful user of scheduled drugs, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(3) and

924(a)(2).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 /s/ George C. Smith 

GEORGE C. SMITH, JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

-2-

Case: 2:13-cr-00015-GCS Doc #: 12 Filed: 03/13/13 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
August 26 , 2015

VIA ELECTRONIC DOCKET ( 9

- AWA

- AGC

- Part

- 16@faa.gov )

Office of the Chief Counsel

Attn: FAA Part 16 Docket Clerk AGC

- 600

Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Ave, SW Washington, DC 20591

Re: Motion for Preliminary Injunction

– Pro

- Flight Aviation, Inc. v. City of Renton

– Docket

No. 16

- 15

- 03

Dear Sir or Madam :

We represent Pro

- Flight Aviation, Inc. ( “PFA ”), in th e above

- reference d matter and ar e writing i n regard to the Motion for Preliminary Injunction ( “ Motion ”) that was filed by PFA on July 17, 2015

.

By way of the Motion, PFA requested that the FAA preliminarily enjoin the City of Renton, Washington ( “City ” or “Respondent ”) from evicting PFA from the nin e tie

- down spots that it currently leases from the City on the 760 Parcel, pending a final determination in this matter. PFA requested this relief because

, as it currently stands, it will be evicted from the 760

Parcel on S eptember 14 , 2015

, 1 so that the Boeing Company can begin making modifications to

the 760 Parcel in order to accommodate 737MAX aircraft

. If the eviction goes ahead as planned

on September 14 th , PFA will be forced to sell or relocate a portion of its flight training aircraft

fleet and/or limit the transient customers to which it can provide parking and other services.

On August 7, 2015, Responde n t submitted an a nswer to the Motion. Given that time is

critical , PFA did not seek leave to file or file a reply brief.

PFA understand s that your office has a significant numbe r of other matters to attend to,

and would not normally expect a decision on the Mot i on to be rendered by this time. However,

1 The original eviction date was August 31, 2015; h owever, the parties agreed to ex tend the date until September 14

, 2015

, in exchange for PFA agreeing to an extension of time for the City to respond to the Motion and to serve its

Answer. 80 Ferry Boulevard Stratford, CT 06615

Phone 203

- 375

- 7724
Fax 203

- 375

- 9397

Writer’s Direct Extension: 108 bhk@lopal.com www.lopal.com 4 45 Park Ave., 9 th Floor New York, NY 10022

Phone 212

- 385

- 1215

Fax 212

- 608

- 1215

Please Reply To: CT Office2

given that P FA will be required to make decisions that will have serious and lasting consequences for its business if the eviction is allowed to proceed, it respectfully seeks an indication as to whether y our office expects to decide the Motion before the September 14 , 2015

eviction date

.

T hank you f

or your consideration and assistance on this matter

.

Sincerely,

/s/

Benjamin H. Klein

cc: Zanetta Fontes, Es q. , Counsel for Respondent (via email)
<TABLE>
                                                                      Exhibit 12

                                                            TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY
                                                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                                                                    -In Thousands-


                                            6 Months
                                             Ended     ----------------------12 Months Ended---------------------------
                                            Jun. 30,   Jun. 31,   Dec. 31,   Dec. 31,   Dec. 31,   Dec. 31,   Dec. 31,
                                              2001       2001       2000       1999       1998       1997       1996
                                             -------    -------    -------    -------    -------    -------    --------
<S>                                          <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>

FIXED CHARGES:
  Interest on Long-Term Debt (1)             $31,676    $64,024    $66,377    $66,836    $72,672    $66,247    $59,836
  Other Interest (2)                          $4,014     $7,954     $9,067    $13,081    $13,207     $9,640    $11,721
  Interest on Capital Lease Obligations (3)  $42,450    $85,290    $90,365    $82,414    $81,823    $83,019    $84,383
                                            --------   --------   --------   --------   --------   --------   --------
TOTAL FIXED CHARGES                          $78,140   $157,268   $165,809   $162,331   $167,702   $158,906   $155,940



NET INCOME                                   $42,415    $80,283    $51,169    $73,475    $41,676    $83,572   $120,852

LESS:
  Extraordinary Income - Net of Tax             $470       $470         $0    $22,597         $0         $0         $0
                                            --------   --------   --------   --------   --------   --------    -------
NET INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS        $41,945    $79,813    $51,169    $50,878    $41,676    $83,572   $120,852

ADD (DEDUCT):
  Income Taxes - Operating Expense           $27,181    $49,335    $19,036    $18,268    $18,372    $19,297     $9,795
  Income Taxes - Other                        $4,855     $8,496     $7,530     $4,082      ($794)  ($41,401)  ($91,950)
  Total Fixed Charges                        $78,140   $157,268   $165,809   $162,331   $167,702   $158,906   $155,940
                                            --------   --------   --------   --------   --------   --------   --------
TOTAL EARNINGS BEFORE TAXES
AND FIXED CHARGES                           $152,121   $294,912   $243,544   $235,559   $226,956   $220,374   $194,637



RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES             1.947      1.875     1.469       1.451      1.353      1.387      1.248



(1) Amounts have been restated for years ended 1996 and 1997 to conform to current year's presentation.

(2) Excludes recognition of Allowance for Borrowed Funds Used During Construction.

(3) Capital Lease Interest Paid from Statement of Cash Flows.


</TABLE>
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER ON M OTION FOR R EHEARING

Appellate case name: Carl D. Sederholm v. Michelle Neville and the Office of the Attorney

General of Texas

Appellate case number: 01

- 12

- 00215

- CV

Trial court case number: 0567982

Trial court: 309th District Court of Harris County

It is ORDERED that the motion for rehearing is denied.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Laura C. H igl e y

Acting for the Court

Panel consist of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Higley and Brown

Date: July 8 , 2014
No. 76-50.

#### Cincinnati Gas & Electric Co. *v.*Abel, dba New Richmond Boating Center.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-10537

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

RONALD DAVISON,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:07-CR-283-1

Before GARZA, CLEMENT, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Ronald Davison has

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Davison has not filed a response. Our

independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous

issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

February 23, 2010

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

Case: 09-10537 Document: 00511033022 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/23/2010
Before the Second Division,

December 6, 1951

No. 56140.

protest 815390-G (Boston).

#### McLaughlin & Freeman *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Rao, J.

The protest was dismissed.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Union Tank Car Company (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
period ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kenneth P. Fischl, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In witness whereof, I have executed this certification as of the 15thday of May, 2006.



/s/ Kenneth P. FischlKenneth P. FischlPrincipal Executive Officer
MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-11-00396-CR

Alex BOSQUEZ,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 290th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2010CR6956

Honorable Melisa Skinner, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice

Delivered and Filed: June 27, 2012

DISMISSED

Appellant has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. The motion is signed by both 

Appellant and his attorney. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a). We, therefore, grant the motion and 

dismiss this appeal. See id.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish
### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 22 - 0351

_________________ ST ATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. ISAAC WILLIAM MACY,

Defendant and Appellant. O R D E R

_________________ Pursua nt to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for submission on briefs to a five - justice panel of this Court. The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to all counsel of r ecord and to the Honorable Matthew J. Cuffe , District Judge . For the Court,

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

January 3 2024

01/03/2024
Case Number: DA 22-0351
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND> This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from 
the March 31, 1998 condensed consolidated balance sheet, condensed consolidated 
statement of income for the three months ended March 31, 1998, and the notes
thereto, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                              MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                        101,387
<SECURITIES>                                        0         
<RECEIVABLES>                                  73,695
<ALLOWANCES>                                    4,156
<INVENTORY>                                    74,813
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    0<F1> 
<PP&E>                                      3,046,221
<DEPRECIATION>                              1,354,865
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              2,184,360
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               0<F1>
<BONDS>                                       872,620
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                      106,689
<OTHER-SE>                                    497,734
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                2,184,360
<SALES>                                        53,377 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              205,937<F2>
<CGS>                                          44,517     
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 122,805 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             18,615
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                49,705
<INCOME-TAX>                                   19,282
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            30,423
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0 
<NET-INCOME>                                   30,423
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       0<F3>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0
<FN>

<F1> The Company issues financial statements utilizing a non-classified balance
     sheet.

<F2> The Company's revenues are derived primarily from railcar leasing.

<F3> The Company is a wholly-owned subsidiary.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>