alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case: 2:12-cv-00355-JLG-EPD Doc #: 19 Filed: 03/28/13 Page: 1 of 10  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00355-JLG-EPD Doc #: 19 Filed: 03/28/13 Page: 2 of 10  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00355-JLG-EPD Doc #: 19 Filed: 03/28/13 Page: 3 of 10  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00355-JLG-EPD Doc #: 19 Filed: 03/28/13 Page: 4 of 10  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00355-JLG-EPD Doc #: 19 Filed: 03/28/13 Page: 5 of 10  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00355-JLG-EPD Doc #: 19 Filed: 03/28/13 Page: 6 of 10  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00355-JLG-EPD Doc #: 19 Filed: 03/28/13 Page: 7 of 10  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00355-JLG-EPD Doc #: 19 Filed: 03/28/13 Page: 8 of 10  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00355-JLG-EPD Doc #: 19 Filed: 03/28/13 Page: 9 of 10  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00355-JLG-EPD Doc #: 19 Filed: 03/28/13 Page: 10 of 10  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-11T19:50:48-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

REGION IX 

Daisy Todachennie 

P. 0. Box 100147

Aneth, UT 84510-0147

75 Hawthorne Street 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

September 30, 2016 

In Reply 

Refer To: 

AIR-3 

NU 05-01 

Subject: McElmo Creek Unit Oil Production Facility Final PSD Permit Decision 

Dear Ms. Todachennie: 

You are receiving this letter for one of the following reasons: 

1) You provided timely written comments or oral testimony to the U.S. Environmental

Protection Agency (EPA) regarding the proposed Clean Air Act Prevention of

Significant Deterioration (PSD) permit amendment for the McElmo Creek Unit Oil

Production Facility (MCU Facility), an existing oil and gas production operation that is

owned, in partnership with Navajo Nation Oil and Gas Company, and operated by the

Resolute Natural Resources Company (Resolute); or

2) You requested notice of the final permit decision.

Enclosed please find the final permit decision, which includes the final PSD permit amendment 

and our responses to public comments, and our notice announcing the final permit decision. The 

final PSD permit amendment, our responses to public comments, and other key documents 

relevant to the final permit are also available through a link at our website, 

http://www.epa.gov/caa-permitting/prevention-significant-deterioration-psd-permits-issuedregion-9, or at http://www.regulations.gov (search: EPA-R09-0AR-2014-0785). 

In accordance with 40 CFR 124.15, this permit will become effective thirty (30) days after the 

EPA has provided notice of the final decision, unless the permit is timely appealed. Pursuant to 

40 CFR 124.19, any person who commented on the proposed permit or participated in the public 

hearing on the proposed permit may appeal the decision and permit conditions to the 

Environmental Appeals Board (EAB) within 30 days after the EPA has provided notice of the 

final permit decision. Any person who failed to file comments or failed to participate in the 

public hearing on the proposed PSD permit revision may file an appeal with the EAB only 

regarding changes from the proposed to the final permit decision. 
If you have any questions about this final action, please do not hesitate to contact Shaheerah 

Kelly of the Air Permits Office at (415) 947-4156 or r9airpermits@epa.gov. 

Enclosure 

2 

Sincerely, 

Chief, Permits Office 

Air Division
III 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 597 

Designating the period beginning on October 8, 2006, and ending on October 

14, 2006, as ‘‘National Hispanic Media Week’’, in honor of the Hispanic 

media of the United States. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 30 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 29), 2006 

Mr. DOMENICI (for himself, Mr. SALAZAR, Mr. MARTINEZ, Mr. BINGAMAN, 

and Mr. NELSON of Florida) submitted the following resolution; which 

was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Designating the period beginning on October 8, 2006, and 

ending on October 14, 2006, as ‘‘National Hispanic 

Media Week’’, in honor of the Hispanic media of the 

United States. 

Whereas, for almost 470 years, the United States has benefitted from the work of Hispanic writers and publishers; 

Whereas more than 600 Hispanic publishers circulate more 

than 20,000,000 copies of publications every week in the 

United States; 

Whereas 1 out of every 8 citizens of the United States is 

served by a Hispanic publisher; 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 597 IS 

Whereas the Hispanic press informs many citizens of the 

United States about the great political, economic, and social issues of the day; 

Whereas the Hispanic press of the United States particularly 

focuses on informing and promoting the well-being of the 

Hispanic community of the United States; and 

Whereas, by commemorating the achievements of the Hispanic press, the Senate acknowledges the important role 

that the Hispanic press has played in the history of the 

United States: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates the period beginning on October 

3 8, 2006, and ending on October 14, 2006, as ‘‘Na4 tional Hispanic Media Week’’, in honor of the His5 panic Media of the United States; and 

6 (2) encourages the people of the United States 

7 to observe the week with appropriate programs and 

8 activities. 

Æ 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

TYHEED K. BROWN,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 69 EAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 30th day of July, 2019

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
H. Con. Res. 123 Agreed to May 16, 2007

One Hundred Tenth Congress

of the

United States of America 

AT THE FIRST SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday, 

the fourth day of January, two thousand and seven 

Concurrent Resolution

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF USE OF CAPITOL GROUNDS FOR D.C. 

SPECIAL OLYMPICS LAW ENFORCEMENT TORCH RUN. 

On June 8, 2007, or on such other date as the Speaker of 

the House of Representatives and the Committee on Rules and 

Administration of the Senate may jointly designate, the 2007 District of Columbia Special Olympics Law Enforcement Torch Run 

(in this resolution referred to as the ‘‘event’’) may be run through 

the Capitol Grounds as part of the journey of the Special Olympics 

torch to the District of Columbia Special Olympics summer games. 

SEC. 2. RESPONSIBILITY OF CAPITOL POLICE BOARD. 

The Capitol Police Board shall take such actions as may be 

necessary to carry out the event. 

SEC. 3. CONDITIONS RELATING TO PHYSICAL PREPARATIONS. 

The Architect of the Capitol may prescribe conditions for physical preparations for the event. 

SEC. 4. ENFORCEMENT OF RESTRICTIONS. 

The Capitol Police Board shall provide for enforcement of the 

restrictions contained in section 5104(c) of title 40, United States 

Code, concerning sales, advertisements, displays, and solicitations 

on the Capitol Grounds, as well as other restrictions applicable 

to the Capitol Grounds, in connection with the event. 

Attest:

Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

Secretary of the Senate.
# Attachment 1

Cape Fear Water Balance DiagramCape Fear Steam Electric PlantWater Flow Line DrawingStormCoalWaterRiverCoolingH20Septic &StormwaterWest Ash PondOverflowCape Fear RiverOutfall 001IntakeAshOutfall 005East Ash PondOutfall 003Cape Fear River CanalEvaporationOutfall 007From Condensate Storage TankWaste OilExhaust GasRiverTo LVRBCoolingH20Coal PilePlant Sump&PumpingStationReverse Osmosisthen ElectrodeDeionizerBoilersPumpingStationLow VolumeRetentionBasin (LVRB)with O/WSeparatorSteam TurbinesCondensersCondensateStorage TankFilter PlantCoolingTowerEquipmentCoolingOilyWasteTankCombustionTurbinesFalse StartDrain TanksHeatRecoverySteamGeneratorSteam TurbinesCondensers

# Attachment 2

Cape Fear Groundwater Monitoring Report – June 2009
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# Great Lakes fishery

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  Great Lakes fishery 
                    -           Creator        
                    -  U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 
                    -           Publisher        
                    -  U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 
                    -           Description        
                    -  Illustrates 51 species of fish found in the California current and adjacent waters. Also depicts two fo the world's outstanding fisheries research centers located in La Jolla, California. 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1970-1980 
                    -           Subject: Place        
                    -  United StatesCanadaGreat Lakes Region (North America) 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  1126 × 77 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Ideal Contex Magnum G600 54 Plus at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at the University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  035518965.jpg; 035518965.jpg 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

United States of America

v. 2:12-cr-129

Anita D. Carpenter 

ORDER

There being no objections, the court hereby adopts the Report

and Recommendation of the magistrate judge (Doc. 8) that the

defendant’s guilty plea be accepted. The court accepts the

defendant’s plea of guilty to Count 1 of the information, and she

is hereby adjudged guilty on that count. The court will defer the

decision of whether to accept the plea agreement until the

sentencing hearing.

Date: July 11, 2012 s\James L. Graham 

 James L. Graham

 United States District Judge

Case: 2:12-cr-00129-JLG Doc #: 11 Filed: 07/12/12 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
### 12794 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 47 / Wednesday, March 11, 2015 / Proposed Rules

(C) Monitoring, as specified in the SMMP, is required.
* * * * * [FR Doc. 2015–05232 Filed 3–10–15; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6560–50–P**

**ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY** 

**40 CFR Part 63**
**[EPA–HQ–OAR–2014–0471; FRL–9924–36– OAR]** 

**RIN 2060–AS26**
**Petition To Add n-Propyl Bromide to the List of Hazardous Air Pollutants;**  **Extension of Comment Period**

**AGENCY :**  Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

**ACTION :**  Receipt of a complete petition; extension of public comment period.

**SUMMARY :**  The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is announcing that the period for providing public comments on the February 6, 2015, receipt of a complete petition document titled ‘‘Petition To Add n-Propyl Bromide to the List of Hazardous Air Pollutants’’ is being extended by 60 days. **DATES :**  The public comment period for the receipt of a complete petition document published in the Federal Register on February 6, 2015 (80 FR 6676), is being extended by 60 days to May 7, 2015, in order to provide the public additional time to submit comments and supporting information.

**ADDRESSES :**  Written comments on the receipt of a complete petition document may be submitted to the EPA electronically, by mail, by facsimile or through hand delivery/courier. Please refer to the Federal Register document (80 FR 6676) for the addresses and detailed instructions.

Docket. Publicly available documents relevant to this action are available for public inspection either electronically at http://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the EPA Docket Center, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC. The Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. A reasonable fee may be charged for copying. The official public docket for this rulemaking is Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OAR–2014–0471.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Mr. John Schaefer, Policy and Strategies Group (D205–02), Sector Policies and Programs Division, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711; Telephone number: (919) 541– 0296; Fax number (919) 541–5600; Email address: schaefer.john@epa.gov.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :** 
Comment Period

After considering a request received to extend the public comment period, the EPA has decided to extend the public comment period for an additional 60 days. Therefore, the public comment period will end on May 7, 2015, rather than March 9, 2015. This extension will help ensure that the public has sufficient time to review the proposed rule, the supporting technical documents and data available in the docket.

Dated: March 2, 2015. Stephen D. Page, Director, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards.
[FR Doc. 2015–05550 Filed 3–9–15; 11:15 am]

**BILLING CODE 6560–50–P**
No. 58200.

protests 200318-K and 214310-K (Laredo).

#### Gebhardt Chili Powder Company *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

From the testimony, it appeared that 4)4 pounds of salt are applied to every 100 pounds of beef, which is then repacked in barrels and shipped in refrigerated trucks. Duty was taken upon the total value, as determined by multiplying the landed weight of the meat and salt by the appraised unit of value, no allowance being made for the salt, liquid, drippings, and other materials. It was orally stipulated that as to the merchandise covered by protest 214310-K, the net weight of the beef was the weight returned upon the official reports and used by the collector, less 2.4 pounds of salt, liquid, drippings, and other materials per 100 pounds; that as to the merchandise covered by protest 200318-K, the net weight was as returned by the collector, less 1.5 pounds of salt, liquids, and drippings per 100 pounds; and that such materials are nonimpor-tations for duty purposes. In view of the agreed statement of facts, it was held that duty should not have been taken upon the salt, liquid, drippings, and other *539materials included in the net weight to the extent of 2.4 pounds per 100 pounds in the salted beef covered by protest 214310-K and to the extent of 1.5 pounds per 100 pounds in the salted beef covered by protest 200318-K.
#### Gray *versus*Garnsey.

This Court has no power to draw from another court an original paper. The register of deeds is the proper officer to certify the copy of the records of a levy on execution.

Debt on poor debtor’s bond given by one Hills, as princi*181pal, and defendant, as surety. The verdict was for plaintiff, and defendant excepted.

*Kelley*and *McCrillis,*for plaintiff.

*J. E. Godfrey,*for defendant.

Shepley, C. J.,

orally.—The only exception is that the plaintiff, in order to increase the damages, was allowed to use in evidence a copy, (certified by the register of deeds,) of a levy of land, from a third person to the said Hills.

1. It is contended that the original paper, being better evidence, should have been produced. But it does not appear that the execution was issued from or returnable to this court. From another court we have no right to draw an original paper. No court is authorized to do that, except that the court of Chancery in England may issue *scire*facias, to draw a document before them. *Hammett*v. Emerson, 27 Maine, 309, is decisive on this point.

2. It is contended that the clerk, and not the register, is the proper certifying officer. It is true that the document, after being recorded in the registry, is to be filed in the clerk’s office. But the clerk has no record of the levy ; he is not required to make one. He is not to certify, except copies of judicial proceedings. The practice has been uniform *to*receive the register’s certificate. He alone has the record, and he alone can certify it. *Exceptions*overruled.
Februar y12 , 201 2

Dea rSi ro rMadam , I a m writin g t o reques t tha t Su n Countr yb e authorize d fo ra slo t a t Reaga n Nationa l Airpor t unde ra n exemptio n rul e (Docke t No
. FAA-2012-0089)
. Th e dail ySu n Countr ydirec t fligh t fro m Lansin g M l t o Washingto n DC connect s legislator s fro m Michigan' s capita l t o th e nation' s capital , an d ease s trave l fo rstat e businesses , fo rMichiga n Stat e Universit yfacult yan d students , an d fo rLans'ing-are a privat e citizens
. Su n Countr yha s safel yflow n ove r48,00 0 passenger s o n thi s rout e sinc e receivin g th e slo t las t April
. Havin g thes e flight s availabl e i s importan t fo rou rregion' s economy . ,Please.consider-the.Lansing.region' s economi cdevelopmen t effort s whe n makin g you rdecision : Than k you . Hele n W
. Ros s J ' •0 

## V

y ^ . ^MPKZ

^ 140 1 Somerse t Clos e S t Eas t Lansing , M l 4882 3 ("' 1 C O

t !

C D 

# oQ S

C O
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-16-0000608 11-MAY-2017 07:46 AM
# C_2016296EN.01001601.xml

| 16.8.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 296/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.8.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 296/16

---

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 9 June 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo (Supreme Court, Spain)) — María del Pilar Planes Bresco v Comunidad Autónoma de Aragón

(Joined Cases C-333/15 and C-334/15) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Common Agricultural Policy - Integrated administration and control system for certain aid schemes - Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 - Single payment scheme - Articles 43 and 44 - Payment entitlements based on areas - Hectares eligible for area aid - Permanent pasture - National legislation making the eligibility of permanent pasture areas which exceed the forage areas initially taken into account for the purposes of determining the payment entitlements subject to conditions that they be used for the purposes of rearing livestock on the farm))

(2016/C 296/21)

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunal Supremo

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: María del Pilar Planes Bresco

Applicant:

Defendant: Comunidad Autónoma de Aragón

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Council Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 of 29 September 2003 establishing common rules for direct support schemes under the common agricultural policy and establishing certain support schemes for farmers and amending Regulations (EEC) No 2019/93, (EC) No 1452/2001, (EC) No 1453/2001, (EC) No 1454/2001, (EC) No 1868/94, (EC) No 1251/1999, (EC) No 1254/1999, (EC) No 1673/2000, (EEC) No 2358/71 and (EC) No 2529/2001, as amended by Council Regulation (EC) No 2012/2006 of 19 December 2006 must be interpreted to the effect that it precludes national legislation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which prevents areas of permanent pasture declared by a farmer which exceed the area of permanent pasture initially taken into account for determining the amount of her payment entitlements per hectare being taken into account as hectares eligible for area aid for an agricultural year, unless the farmer demonstrates that those areas are actually being used for the purposes of rearing livestock on her farm in that agricultural year.

---

(1)  OJ C 302, 14.9.2015

1

---
# C_2017104EN.01001801.xml

| 3.4.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 104/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 104/18

---

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 9 February 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Bremen — Germany) — Madaus GmbH v Hauptzollamt Bremen

(Case C-441/15) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Common Customs Tariff - Tariff classification - Combined Nomenclature - Headings 3824 90 97 and 2106 90 92 - Product in powder form composed of calcium carbonate (95 %) and modified starch (5 %)))

(2017/C 104/26)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Finanzgericht Bremen

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Madaus GmbH

Applicant:

Defendant: Hauptzollamt Bremen

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Combined Nomenclature in Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff, in the version resulting from Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1001/2013 of 4 October 2013 must be interpreted to the effect that a product, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, used for the manufacture of calcium tablets in the form of simple tablets, effervescent tablets and chewable tablets, consisting of chemically defined calcium carbonate in powder form and, to improve suitability for use in tablets, added modified starch, and with a starch content of less than 5 % by weight, must be classified under heading 2106 of that nomenclature.

---

(1)  OJ C 398, 30.11.2015.

1

---