alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(Reap. Dec. 9799)

#### Plywood & Door Northern Corporation *v.*United States

Entry No. 22316.

(Decided October 6, 1960)

*James Wilson Young*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Douh,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Mollison, Judge:

Counsel for the parties have submitted the above-enumerated appeal for reappraisement upon stipulation, on the basis of which I find that foreign value, as defined in section 402(c), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, is the proper basis for the determination of the value of the Finnish birch plywood involved, and that such value is $46.38 per thousand square feet, net, packed.

Judgment will issue accordingly.
Exhibit 10.2
 Original:
    
    TMJcc:
    
    TAA;
    
    CATKDM;
    
    TJOCJN;
    
    PJSILP:
 
       Service to be Rendered.




---



##### 



Term
 Rates
 Notices
 Superseded Agreements
  Other Obligations
 UGI UTILITIES, INC.
    

    COLUMBIA GAS TRANSMISSION CORPORATIONBy
    
    /s/ Robert J. Chaney
    
    
    By
    
    /s/ Barry J. LoweryTitle
    
    Vice President & General Manager
    

    
    
    Title
    
    Manager  Agreements Admin




---



##### 



Primary Receipt Points
 FootnoScheduling
    
    Scheduling
    
    
    Measuring
    
    
    t
    
    
    Measuring
    
    
    Maximum DailyPoint No.
    
    Point Name
    
    
    Point No.
    
    
    e
    
    
    Point Name
    
    
    Quantity (Dth/Day)801
    
    LEACH
    
    
    801
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    50,412




---



##### 



Primary Delivery Points
 Footno
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Maximum DailyScheduling
    
    Scheduling
    
    Measuring
    
    
    t
    
    
    Measuring
    
    
    Delivery ObligationPoint No.
    
    Point Name
    
    Point No.
    
    
    e
    
    
    Point Name
    
    
    (Dth/Day)72
    
    UGI CORPORATION
    
    
    72
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    50,412




---



##### 



UGI UTILITIES, INC.By
    
    /s/ Robert J. ChaneyIts
    
    Vice President & General ManagerDate 2/3/97COLUMBIA GAS
TRANSMISSION CORPORATIONBy
    
    /s/ Barry J. LoweryIts
    
    Manager  Agreements AdministrationDate October 2, 1996
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

JANSSEN ORTHO, LLC,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

UNITED STATES,

Defendant-Appellant

______________________

2020-1663

______________________

Appeal from the United States Court of International 

Trade in No. 1:13-cv-00296-JCG, Judge Jennifer ChoeGroves.

______________________

O R D E R

______________________

Before PROST, Chief Judge, MAYER and WALLACH, Circuit 

Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Before the court is the parties’ April 21, 2021, joint response to the Order to Show Cause. The parties have 

agreed there is no need for redactions. Accordingly, 

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

Case: 20-1663 Document: 53 Page: 1 Filed: 04/26/2021
2 JANSSEN ORTHO, LLC v. US

The opinion issued under seal on April 13, 2021 is 

hereby unsealed.

FOR THE COURT

April 26, 2021 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Date Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Case: 20-1663 Document: 53 Page: 2 Filed: 04/26/2021
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>            5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
EXTRACTED FROM THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1998 AND THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE
SHEET AT JUNE 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>         1,000

       
<S>                                     <C>

<PERIOD-TYPE>                             6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                              JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         34,000
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 608,275
<ALLOWANCES>                                   19,347
<INVENTORY>                                   533,699
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            1,215,613
<PP&E>                                      7,227,226
<DEPRECIATION>                              3,511,942
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              5,220,535
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         853,050
<BONDS>                                     1,299,215
<COMMON>                                       69,334
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<OTHER-SE>                                  1,950,326
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                5,220,535
<SALES>                                     2,278,643
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            2,278,643
<CGS>                                       1,734,118
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               2,137,376
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  748
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             59,335
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                81,184
<INCOME-TAX>                                   30,206
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            45,532 <F1>
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                    45,532
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.66
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.65
<FN>
<F1>
REFLECTS ADJUSTMENT FOR MINORITY INTEREST (NET OF TAX) OF $5,446
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v RONALD C. PETERSON, Private First Class, U. S. Army, Appellant

17 USCMA 548, 38 CMR 346

No. 20,837

May 17, 1968

*Captain Mark Kessel*argued the cause for Appellant, Accused. With him on the brief were *Colonel Daniel T. Ghent*and *Major Jack G. McKay.*

*Captain Salvatore A. Romano*argued the cause for Appellee, United States. With him on the brief were *Lieutenant Colonel David Rarick, Major Edwin P. Wasinger, Major John F. Webb, Jr.,*and *Captain R. Kevin McHugh.*

Opinion of the Court

Ferguson, Judge:

Tried by general court-martial convened at Camp Martin Cox, Vietnam, the accused pleaded' guilty to involuntary manslaughter and five specifications of assault with a dangerous weapon, in violation of Uniform Code of Military Justice, Article 119 and Article 128, 10 USC §§ 919, 928, respectively. He was found guilty and sentenced to bad-conduct discharge, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, confinement at hard labor for five years, and reduction. Pursuant to the terms of a pretrial agreement, the convening authority reduced the term of adjudged imprisonment to two years, but otherwise approved the sentence. The board of review affirmed, and we granted accused’s petition for review upon the assertion that his pleas of guilty were rendered improvident inasmuch as they were based upon the erroneous assumption that the offenses alleged were separately punishable when, in fact, they were not.

Basically, the facts indicate accused, engaged in horseplay, threw a fragmentation grenade toward a company shower point. ’ As a result of its impact with the ground, the grenade armed itself and exploded. One soldier was killed, and five others were injured. Based on these facts, appellate defense counsel, relying on Bell v United States, 349 US 81, 99 L Ed 905, 75 S Ct 620 (1955), and Ladner v United States, 358 US 169, 3 L Ed 2d 199, 79 S Ct 209 (1958), urge that, as all injuries resulted from a single grenade explosion, the offenses alleged were not separately punishable, even *549though involving violence against different victims.

For the reasons set forth in United States v Parker, 17 USCMA 545, 38 CMR 343, this day decided, we disagree and conclude, in the case of offenses against the person, each homicide and assault against a different victim is a separately punishable crime. The maximum punishment imposable extended, therefore, among other things, to confinement at hard labor for eighteen years. Assuming, then, that multiplicity may affect the providence of guilty pleas, there was no such factor present here.

The decision of the board of review is aifirmed.

Chief Judge Quinn and Judge Kil-day concur.
<TABLE>
                                                                EXHIBIT NO. 21B



                                        LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF
                                    THE UNITED ILLUMINATING COMPANY
                                    -------------------------------


<CAPTION>
                                        STATE OR JURISDICTION
                                         OF INCORPORATION OR            NAME UNDER WHICH
    NAME OF SUBSIDIARY                       ORGANIZATION             SUBSIDIARY DOES BUSINESS
    ------------------                  ---------------------         ------------------------

<S>                                         <C>                       <C>
United Resources, Inc.                      Connecticut               United Resources, Inc.

Xcelecom, Inc.*                             Connecticut               Xcelecom, Inc.

American Payment Systems, Inc.*             Connecticut               American Payment Systems, Inc.

United Bridgeport Energy, Inc.*             Connecticut               United Bridgeport Energy, Inc.

United Capital Investments, Inc.*           Connecticut               United Capital Investments, Inc.

Precision Power, Inc.**                     Connecticut               Precision Power, Inc.

McPhee Electric Ltd., LLC**                 Connecticut               McPhee Electric Ltd., LLC

McPhee Utility Power and Signal, Ltd.**     Connecticut               McPhee Utility Power and Signal, Ltd.

Thermal Energies, Inc.**                    Connecticut               Thermal Energies, Inc.

Precision Constructors, Inc.**              Connecticut               Precision Constructors, Inc.

Allan Electric Co., Inc.**                  New Jersey                Allan Electric Co., Inc.

The DataStore, Incorporated**               New Jersey                The DataStore Incorporated

Orlando Diefenderfer Electrical             Pennsylvania              Orlando Diefenderfer Electrical Contractors,
Contractors, Inc.**                                                   Inc.

Souwestcon Properties, Inc.***              Connecticut              Souwestcon Properties, Inc.
</TABLE>


----------------------

*     Subsidiary of United Resources, Inc.
**    Subsidiary of Xcelecom, Inc.
***   Subsidiary of United Capital Investments, Inc.
# C_2016419EN.01001602.xml

| 14.11.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 419/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.11.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 419/16

---

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 21 September 2016 — European Commission v Kingdom of Spain

(Case C-139/15 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - Cohesion Fund - Reduction of financial assistance - Procedure of adoption of the decision by the European Commission - Existence of a time limit - Non-compliance with the time limit laid down - Consequences))

(2016/C 419/20)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Appellant: European Commission (represented by: S. Pardo Quintillán and D. Recchia, acting as Agents)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: Kingdom of Spain (represented by: A. Rubio González, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings:

Intervener in support of the defendant: Kingdom of the Netherlands (represented by: B. Koopman and M. Bulterman, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders the European Commission to pay the costs; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the European Commission to pay the costs;

| 3. | Orders the Kingdom of the Netherlands to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Kingdom of the Netherlands to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 155, 11.5.2015.

1

---
EXHIBIT 12

                    TRANSAMERICA CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES


                                                 Six months ended June 30,
                                                  1997            1996
                                               (Dollar amounts in millions)

Fixed charges:
    Interest and debt expense                   $  308.0         $  343.9
    One-third of rental expense                     20.5             12.1
    Dividends declared on preferred
       securities issued by affiliates              19.9              8.6
                                                --------         --------
        Total                                   $  348.4         $  364.6
                                                ========         ========

Earnings:
    Net income                                  $  468.9         $  221.2
    Provision for income taxes                     280.8            114.7
    Fixed charges                                  348.4            364.6
                                                --------         --------
        Total                                   $1,098.1         $  700.5
                                                ========         ========

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                  3.15             1.92
                                                ========         ========
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 507 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 507

   Designating the week of November 5 through November 11, 2006, as 
 ``National Veterans Awareness Week'' to emphasize the need to develop 
  educational programs regarding the contributions of veterans to the 
                                country.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 13, 2006

Mr. Biden submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Designating the week of November 5 through November 11, 2006, as 
 ``National Veterans Awareness Week'' to emphasize the need to develop 
  educational programs regarding the contributions of veterans to the 
                                country.

Whereas tens of millions of Americans have served in the Armed Forces of the 
        United States during the past century;
Whereas hundreds of thousands of Americans have given their lives while serving 
        in the Armed Forces during the past century;
Whereas the contributions and sacrifices of the men and women who served in the 
        Armed Forces have been vital in maintaining the freedoms and way of life 
        enjoyed by the people of the United States;
Whereas the advent of the all-volunteer Armed Forces has resulted in a sharp 
        decline in the number of individuals and families who have had any 
        personal connection with the Armed Forces;
Whereas this reduction in familiarity with the Armed Forces has resulted in a 
        marked decrease in the awareness by young people of the nature and 
        importance of the accomplishments of those who have served in the Armed 
        Forces, despite the current educational efforts of the Department of 
        Veterans Affairs and the veterans service organizations;
Whereas the system of civilian control of the Armed Forces makes it essential 
        that the future leaders of the Nation understand the history of military 
        action and the contributions and sacrifices of those who conduct such 
        actions; and
Whereas, on November 2, 2005, President George W. Bush issued a proclamation 
        urging all the people of the United States to observe November 6 through 
        November 12, 2005, as ``National Veterans Awareness Week'': Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) designates the week of November 5 through November 11, 
        2006, as ``National Veterans Awareness Week''; and
            (2) encourages the people of the United States to observe 
        the week with appropriate educational activities.
                                 <all>
```
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Corporate Trust Services**

  MAC R1204-010  9062 Old Annapolis Road  Columbia, MD 21045  Tel: 410 884 2000  Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

Re: Annual Statement ofCompliance for COMM 2016-CCRE28 Mortgage Trust Commercial Mortgage Pass-ThroughCertificates, Series 2016-CCRE28

 

 

Per the Pooling and ServicingAgreement dated as of February 1, 2016 (the "Agreement"), theundersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., asCertificate Administrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies asfollows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2016 (the "ReportingPeriod"):

 

(a) A review of Wells Fargo'sactivities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under theAgreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and

 

(b) To the best of suchofficer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of itsobligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

 

February 27, 2017

 

 

/s/ Brian Smith

BRIAN SMITH

Vice President 

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll  go far |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------|
# C_2015302EN.01002402.xml

| 14.9.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 302/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.9.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 302/24

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal da Relação de Évora (Portugal) lodged on 13 July 2015 — Andrew Marcus Henderson v Novo Banco SA

(Case C-354/15)

(2015/C 302/31)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunal da Relação de Évora

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Andrew Marcus Henderson

Appellant:

Respondent: Novo Banco SA

Respondent:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Where a Portuguese court hearing a civil action against an individual residing in another Member State of the European Union has ordered that notice of service of those proceedings be served on that individual by registered letter with acknowledgment of receipt, and the corresponding acknowledgment of receipt has not been returned, may the Portuguese court consider, in the light of the above Regulation [EC 1393/2007] (1) and the principles underlying it, that such service was effected, on the basis of the documents of the postal authority of the state in which the addressee of the letter resides which prove that the registered letter with acknowledgment of receipt was delivered to the addressee? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Where a Portuguese court hearing a civil action against an individual residing in another Member State of the European Union has ordered that notice of service of those proceedings be served on that individual by registered letter with acknowledgment of receipt, and the corresponding acknowledgment of receipt has not been returned, may the Portuguese court consider, in the light of the above Regulation [EC 1393/2007] (1) and the principles underlying it, that such service was effected, on the basis of the documents of the postal authority of the state in which the addressee of the letter resides which prove that the registered letter with acknowledgment of receipt was delivered to the addressee?

1

| 2. | Does the application of Article 230 of the Portuguese Code of Civil Procedure, in the case referred to the first question, infringe the Regulation and the principles underlying it? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Does the application of Article 230 of the Portuguese Code of Civil Procedure, in the case referred to the first question, infringe the Regulation and the principles underlying it?

| 3. | Does the application of Article 191(2) of the Portuguese Code of Civil Procedure in the present case infringe the Regulation and principles underlying it? |
| --- | --- |

3.

Does the application of Article 191(2) of the Portuguese Code of Civil Procedure in the present case infringe the Regulation and principles underlying it?

---

(1)  Regulation (EC) No 1393/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 November 2007 on the service in the Member States of judicial and extrajudicial documents in civil or commercial matters (service of documents), and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 1348/2000 (OJ 2007 L 324, p. 79).

1

---
EXHIBIT 31.1
------------
                           SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

    I, Alfred R. Globus,  Chief Executive  Officer of  United-Guardian,  Inc.,
certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of United-Guardian, Inc.

2.  Based on my  knowledge,  this  annual  report  does not  contain  any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made, not  misleading  with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included  in this annual  report,  fairly  present in all  material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and  I are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

    a) designed such disclosure  controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others  within those  entities,  particularly  during the
period in which this annual report is being prepared;

    b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure  controls and
procedures  as of a date  within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual
report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

    c) presented in this annual report our conclusions  about the  effectiveness
of the  disclosure  controls and  procedures  based on our  evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation,  to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's   board  of  directors  (or  persons   performing   the  equivalent
functions):

    a) all  significant  deficiencies  in the design or  operation  of  internal
controls  which  could  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability to record,
process,  summarize  and  report  financial  data  and have  identified  for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

    b) any fraud,  whether or not material,  that  involves  management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and I have  indicated in this
annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls
or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent
to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date:  May 7, 2004                       /s/ Alfred R. Globus
                                         -----------------------
                                         Alfred R. Globus
                                         Chief Executive Officer