alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 49853.

#### Protest 108799-K of I. Habinsky (New York).

Opinion by

Walker, J.

The case was ordered submitted, and official examination of the papers failed to disclose any reason for disturbing the action of the collector, which was held presumptively correct.
III 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 550 

Designating October 22 through October 28, 2006, as ‘‘National Save for 

Retirement Week’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

AUGUST 3, 2006 

Mr. SMITH (for himself and Mr. CONRAD) submitted the following resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

SEPTEMBER 13, 2006 

Committee discharged; considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating October 22 through October 28, 2006, as 

‘‘National Save for Retirement Week’’. 

Whereas the cost of retirement continues to rise, in part, because people in the United States are living longer than 

ever before, the number of employers providing retiree 

health coverage continues to decline, and retiree health 

care costs continue to increase at a rapid pace; 

Whereas Social Security remains the bedrock of retirement 

income for the great majority of the people of the United 

States, but was never intended by Congress to be the sole 

source of retirement income for families; 

Whereas recent data from the Employee Benefit Research Institute indicates that, in the United States, less than 2⁄3


pwalker on PRODPC60 with BILLS
2 

SRES 550 ATS 

of workers or their spouses are currently saving for retirement and that the actual amount of retirement savings of workers lags far behind the amount that is realistically needed to adequately fund retirement; 

Whereas many employees have available to them through 

their employers access to defined benefit or defined contribution plans to assist them in preparing for retirement; 

Whereas many employees may not be aware of their retirement savings options and may not have focused on the 

importance of and need for saving for their own retirement; 

Whereas many employees may not be taking advantage of 

workplace defined contribution plans at all or to the full 

extent allowed by the plans or under Federal law; and 

Whereas all workers, including public- and private-sector employees, employees of tax-exempt organizations, and selfemployed individuals, can benefit from increased awareness of the need to save for retirement and the availability of tax-advantaged retirement savings vehicles to 

assist them in saving for retirement: Now, therefore, be 

it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates October 22 through October 28, 

3 2006, as ‘‘National Save for Retirement Week’’; 

4 (2) supports the goals and ideals of National 

5 Save for Retirement Week, including raising public 

6 awareness about the importance of adequate retireVerDate Aug 31 2005 04:33 Sep 14, 2006 Jkt 049196 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\SR550.ATS SR550

pwalker on PRODPC60 with BILLS
3 

SRES 550 ATS 

1 ment savings and the availability of employer-spon2 sored retirement plans; and 

3 (3) calls on the Federal Government, States, lo4 calities, schools, nonprofit organizations, businesses, 

5 other entities, and the people of the United States 

6 to observe the week with appropriate programs and 

7 activities with the goal of increasing the retirement 

8 savings of all the people of the United States. 

Æ 


pwalker on PRODPC60 with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-6982
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ANTHONY LEE THAMES, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (CR-00-122-7-1-FO, CA-02-56-F) Submitted: October 1, 2003 Decided: October 17, 2003 Before WIDENER and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Anthony Lee Thames, Appellant Pro Se. Eric Evenson, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Anthony Lee Thames seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a habeas corpus proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. This Court will not issue a certificate of appealability as to claims dismissed by a district court on procedural grounds unless the movant can demonstrate both “(1) ‘that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the petition [or motion] states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right’ and (2) ‘that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the district court was correct in its procedural ruling.’” Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 684 (4th Cir.) (quoting Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 941 (2001). The relevant inquiry for claims addressed on the merits is whether “reasonable jurists would find the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong.” Slack , 529 U.S. at 484. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Thames has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are3 adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 35.1

AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE CORPORATION

ANNUAL COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE

PURSUANT TO SECTION 3.11(a) OF THE 

SALE AND SERVICING AGREEMENT AND

ITEM 1123 OF REGULATION AB

I, Paul C. Honda, do hereby certify that I am the Vice President and Assistant Secretary of American Honda Finance Corporation, a California corporation (the “Company”), and further certify on behalf of the Company in its capacity as servicer (the “Servicer” and “Sponsor”) under the Sale and Servicing Agreement (the “Agreement”) dated as of February 25, 2016 among the Servicer and Sponsor, American Honda Receivables LLC, as Seller, and Honda Auto Receivables 2016-1 Owner Trust, as follows:

|   | (i) | A review of the activities of the Servicer during the reporting period ended March 31, 2018, and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under my supervision. |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (ii) | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement throughout such period in all material respects. |
|--------|------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 15th day of May, 2018.

 

|   | /s/ Paul C. Honda                                    |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Paul C. Honda                                        |  |
|   | Vice President and Assistant Secretary               |  |
|   | (senior officer in charge of the servicing function) |  |
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**

MEMORANDUM OPINION

N o. 04

- 14

- 00821

- CV

CITY OF CARRIZO SPRINGS and Adrian DeLeon, individually and as Mayor of the City of Carrizo S prings, Appellants

v.

Isabel CUMPIAN , Bill Martin, Alfredo Z. Padilla, Individually and on behalf of the Carrizo Springs Housing Authority, Appellees

From the 365th Judicial District Court, Dimmit County, Texas Trial Court No. 14

- 09

- 12375

- DCV

- AJA Honorable Amado J. Abascal, III, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Jason Pulliam, Justice

Delivered and Filed: March 11, 2015

DIS MISSED

Appellants have filed an advisory to the cou rt, stating that the parties have compromised

all pending claims between them and that appellants withdraw their appeal. We construe the

advisory as a motion to dismiss the appeal and w e grant the motion. Because the advisory to the

court does not disclo se an agreement of the parties regarding the assessment of costs, we order all04

- 14

- 00821

- CV

costs assessed against appellant s

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1(d) (absent agreement of the parties,

costs are taxed against appellant).

PER CURIAM

- 2

-
Case No. 13,940.

#### THOMPSON v. AFFLICK.

[2 Cranch, C. C. 67.] 1

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

Dec. Term, 1812.

Witness — Competency — Interest — Surety on Administrator’s Bond.

A surety in an administration bond is a competent witness for the administrator.

[See Case No. 13,939.]

Mr. Caldwell, for defendant

[Afflick’s administrator], offered to examine as witness for the defendant, Charles Glover, who was a surety in the defendant’s administration bond.

Mr. Key, for plaintiff

[Thompson’s administrator], objected that the witness was interested.

But

THE COURT

overruled the objection.
# Official Journal C 305A/30 A

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 305A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6130 August 2018 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 305A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6130 August 2018

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) |
| 2018/C 305 A/01 | Notice of open competition — EPSO/AST-SC/07/18 — Armed security and protection officers (SC 1/SC 2) | 1 |

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO)

2018/C 305 A/01

Notice of open competition — EPSO/AST-SC/07/18 — Armed security and protection officers (SC 1/SC 2)

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
# C_2017202EN.01000301.xml

| 26.6.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.6.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/3

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 27 April 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht — Germany) — Freie und Hansestadt Hamburg v Jost Pinckernelle

(Case C-535/15) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Registration, evaluation, authorisation and restriction of chemicals - Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (REACH Regulation) - General obligation to register and information requirements - Unregistered chemicals - Export of unregistered chemicals outside the territory of the European Union))

(2017/C 202/04)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Bundesverwaltungsgericht

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Freie und Hansestadt Hamburg

Applicant:

Defendant: Jost Pinckernelle

Defendant:

intervening parties: Vertreter des Bundesinteresses beim Bundesverwaltungsgericht

intervening parties:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 5 of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), establishing a European Chemicals Agency, amending Directive 1999/45/EC and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 793/93 and Commission Regulation (EC) No 1488/94 as well as Council Directive 76/769/EEC and Commission Directives 91/155/EEC, 93/67/EEC, 93/105/EC and 2000/21/EC, read in conjunction with Article 3(12) of that regulation, must be interpreted as meaning that substances which have not be registered at the time of their import into the territory of the European Union in accordance with that regulation may be exported outside that territory.

---

(1)  OJ C 7, 11.1.2016.

1

---
# Official Journal C 90/2020

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 90 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6319 March 2020 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 90

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6319 March 2020

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2020/C 90/01 | Euro exchange rates — 18 March 2020 | 1 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2020/C 90/01

Euro exchange rates — 18 March 2020

1

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | COURT PROCEEDINGS |
| | EFTA Court |
| 2020/C 90/02 | Judgment of the Court of 14 December 2019 in Case E-1/19 Andreas Gyrre v The Norwegian Government, represented by the Ministry of Children and Equality
  (Directive 2005/29/EC – Unfair business-to-consumer commercial practices – Annex I – Point 9 – Stating or otherwise creating the impression that a product can legally be sold when it cannot) | 2 |
| 2020/C 90/03 | Judgment of the Court of 13 December 2019 in Case E-1/18 EFTA Surveillance Authority v The Kingdom of Norway
  (Directive 2006/54/EC – employment and working conditions – parental benefits) | 3 |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2020/C 90/04 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.9507 — Salini Impregilo/Astaldi) Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 4 |

V   Announcements

COURT PROCEEDINGS

EFTA Court

2020/C 90/02

Judgment of the Court of 14 December 2019 in Case E-1/19 Andreas Gyrre v The Norwegian Government, represented by the Ministry of Children and Equality
  (Directive 2005/29/EC – Unfair business-to-consumer commercial practices – Annex I – Point 9 – Stating or otherwise creating the impression that a product can legally be sold when it cannot)

(Directive 2005/29/EC – Unfair business-to-consumer commercial practices – Annex I – Point 9 – Stating or otherwise creating the impression that a product can legally be sold when it cannot)

2

2020/C 90/03

Judgment of the Court of 13 December 2019 in Case E-1/18 EFTA Surveillance Authority v The Kingdom of Norway
  (Directive 2006/54/EC – employment and working conditions – parental benefits)

(Directive 2006/54/EC – employment and working conditions – parental benefits)

3

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2020/C 90/04

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.9507 — Salini Impregilo/Astaldi) Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

4

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
|  |
|--|
|  | Message from                                                                                                                                                                        Donna E. Shalala

Foreword

Preface

Acknowledgments

Table of Contents

Chapter 1                                                                                                                                                        Introduction

Chapter 2                                                                                                                                                        The Magnitude of Youth Violence

Chapter 3                                                                                                                                                        The Developmental Dynamics of Youth Violence

Chapter 4                                                                                                                                                        Risk Factors for Youth Violence

Chapter 5                                                                                                                                                        Prevention and Intervention

Chapter 6                                                                                                                                                        A Vision for the Future

Glossary

Index

List of Tables and Figures

Executive Summary | Search              Enter your query below:Use Free-Text Query.
****Back to Top |
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

233 
234 

"hi1 prop8Pty Within th0 j~i4diOtlO4 Of thl8 

etate, real or per4ona1, oorPorat4 or lneorporat4, 

and any lntereet therein, lnoludingl . . ., or 

gifta aado or intended k, take l ffeo t in poreeeeion or enjoymnt after the deetb of the grantor 

or donor, ehall, upon pareing to or for the uoo of 

my pertson, oorporatlon, or aeoociation, be aubjeot to e,tax for the bemilt or the >tate*e @enera1 Reronuo Fund, in uooordanoe with the following olaeaifi0atlon. . .I 

In order to determln~ the lntereet of the mother 

and drughter in the bank 4ooount prior to the death OS th4 

saother, the intention OS purtfee 14 the foremoet oomlderation. 'a'8 are unable to find vhero my joint teneney ir 

oreat4d, despite the faot that th4 8UrTltOr beaome4 entitled 

to all of the money in the bank. Under the faotr ia thl8 

oaee, either the aother or tha daughter oould hare drawa 

oheok8 4qua~-ih amount to the full mount ranraining in the v 

benk aooou@t and therrbr ueo all Or the money to her own 

indlrldu41 b4netlt and dortroy whatever lnterert the othrr 

nay hero had in th4 m~aor. All of the Monet wan Plaoed ln 

the bw aooortnt by tb mothar. Without atbinptla$ to 

(live en$ name to the Pntereat of tha parties, it 18 ow 

opinion that in truth and In iaot the .mther wa4 surely 

plaoi.n& ame In the bank aooouut in the mm4 of hsreelf of 

her Baughter, upon rvhloh either ehe and her dau&ter oould 

draw ohecke rhea either 02 them dealred to do 80. We believe that tko daugbtor reoelved no vested Lntereet in tha 

memy at the time the mother deposited the came, but rather 

ereh tise the daughter drew a shook against the aoaount 

them wae a &ift from the mother to the daughter at that 

tlma or the amount or the ohaok. we bolleve turthor that 

It wa8 the lntuatlon oi the nother that upon her death 

the remaining money ln the bank aooaunt 8hWa 6~ to the 

daughter for her own uee and benoflt end po4a44slon wlthout 

the n4O44slt~ or probato prooradlage isi nferenoa to ouch 

money. 

It 14 our opinion, therefore, that any amuut 

whioh the daughter drew bl oheok upon said aoeount prior to 

the death of the ;rother w&4 a $Fit which took effe6t In enjoyaant and poss484lon a4 of the tlma that euoh ohe$k wae 
235 

drawn and the aan4 ia thereiore not aubfeot to the Taxao 

iiiQ4rltence tar. It is our opinion, howwer, t&t the aawnt rmaining in the bank aooout at the t1.m of the 

death of the &other now purr08 to the daughter in i)04444- 

sion and rn;oymmt ae a girt fmr the mther Lntonding to 

take affeot d-tar the trx)thar'e derth. Therefore, euoh ull 

wunt ie taxabLe ~i~det the Texcne inharftanoe t4x law aa 

quoted sugra. 

Your4 very truly
Publié sur Famine Early Warning Systems Network (http://www.fews.net)

Afrique de l'Ouest

Mali

This country is monitored by local FEWS NET staff

Mise à jour sur la sécurité alimentaire

Le niveau moyen des prix des céréales

favorise l’accès des ménages aux marchés

Janvier 2016

Messages clés:

La bonne disponibilité céréalière sur les marchés grâce à la production agricole globalement

supérieure à la moyenne et les stocks paysans moyens dans l’ensemble contribuent au

maintien des prix à des niveaux proches de la moyenne ; ce qui permet un accès moyen des

ménages aux denrées alimentaires à travers le pays. Par conséquent, la majorité des

ménages du pays se trouvent dans une situation d’insécurité alimentaire Minimale (Phase 1

de l’IPC).
Les conditions d’élevage globalement moyennes à bonnes à travers le pays favorisent le

maintien d’un embonpoint et des productions animales (lait, produits laitiers) à un niveau

moyen ; ce qui permet durant l’année alimentaire 2016 des revenus moyens issus de leur

vente pour l’accès des éleveurs aux marchés pour leurs besoins alimentaires grâce à des

termes de l’échange bétail/céréales qui leur sont favorables.

Les ménages pasteurs pauvres des régions de Tombouctou et de Gao qui connaissent une

réduction inhabituelle de la taille de leur cheptel à cause des mortalités et des ventes

inhabituelles des deux dernières années qui ont engendré une décapitalisation auront

recours de façon inhabituelle à la migration, à la main d’œuvre et aux emprunts pour

compenser la baisse des revenus animaliers. Ils seront par conséquent en insécurité

alimentaire de Stress (Phase 2 de l’IPC) à partir de mars 2016.

A cause de leur dépendance au marché plus longue que d’habitude et de l’épuisement

précoce de leurs stocks, les ménages pauvres victimes des inondations de juillet à

septembre 2015 estimés à 14600 par OCHA ne pourront satisfaire convenablement leurs

besoins alimentaires et non alimentaires (reconstituer les biens perdus) qu’en faisant recours

à des stratégies d’adaptation atypiques. Par conséquent, ils seront dans une situation

d’insécurité alimentaire de Stress (Phase 2 de l’IPC) à partir de mars 2016.

Region Contact Information:

Email: fews.mali@fews.net

URL source: http://www.fews.net/fr/west-africa/mali/food-security-outlook-update/january-2016

FEWS NET is a USAID-funded activity. The content of this report does not necessarily reflect the view of the United

States Agency for International Development or the United States Government.
No. 56120.

protests 33117-K/89363, etc. (Chicago).

#### Mandel Bros., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Rao, J.

The protests were dismissed.
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
Youhave reached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection(FDLP/EC) Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in theFDLP/EC. Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suiteof cataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications (CGP).
**Title:****LED newsletter [electronic resource].
 
Vol 1.1 | Vol1.2
Vol 2.1 | Vol2.2
Vol 3.1 | Vol3.2
 
SuDoc Number:C 3.2:L 85/
Item Number:0146 (online)
CGP System Number:
 
September 26, 2017**
# C_2016475EN.01001402.xml

| 19.12.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 475/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.12.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 475/14

---

Order of the President of the Court of 23 September 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Oradea — Romania) — SC Vicdantrans SRL v Direcția Generală Regională a Finanțelor Publice Cluj Napoca prin Administrația Județeană a Finanțelor Publice Bihor, Administrația Fondului pentru Mediu

(Case C-73/15) (1)

1

(2016/C 475/21)

Language of the case: Romanian

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 155, 11.5.2015.

1

---
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Edward Bernard Davenport v . The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01

- 1 4

- 00 27 6

- CR

Trial court case number: 1 39 3017

Trial court: 351st District Court of Harris County

Appellant’s counsel’s filed a motion to withdraw and brief pursuant to Anders v.

California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967), but did not state that he sent the record

to appellant. P ursuant to Kelly v. State

, No. PD

- 0702

- 13, 2014 WL 2865901 , at *4 (Tex.

Crim. App. June 25, 2014), we order the Clerk of this Court to mail the Clerk’s Record

and the Reporter’s Record in this appeal to appellant.

Further , we order the a ppellant to file his response to the Anders brief , if any,

within 3 0 days of the date of this order . Appellant is further notified that if he fails to

submit such a response within 30 days of this order, the Court will decide the motion to

withdraw without an Anders response.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes



Date: August 26, 2014