alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                              87
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      568
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        254
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  2095
<PP&E>                                           20243
<DEPRECIATION>                                    4908
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   18281
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             1711
<BONDS>                                           1225
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           632
<OTHER-SE>                                        5553
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     18281
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  3843
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     3089
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 191
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    632
<INCOME-TAX>                                       227
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                405
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       405
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21
- 6929

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v. CEDRIC DEON WASHINGTON, Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Charleston

. David C. Norton , District Judge. ( 2:09

- cr - 00800

- DCN

- 4 )

Submitted : October 15, 2021 Decided: January 11, 2022

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, THACKER , Circuit Judge , and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge

.
Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

. Cedric Deon Washington, Appellant Pro Se. Sean Kittrell, Assistant United S t ates Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 21-6929 Doc: 13 Filed: 01/11/2022 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM: Cedric Deon Washington, a federal prisoner, appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion for compassionate release purs uant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A), as amended by the First Step Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115

- 391, § 603(b)(1), 132 Stat. 5194,
5239

. We review a district court ’ s order denying a compassionate release motion for abuse of discretion. United States v. Kibbl e , 992 F.3d 326, 329 (4th Cir. 2021) , cert. denied , No.
21

- 5624, 2021 WL 4733616 (U.S. Oct. 12, 2021)

. We have reviewed the record and discern no abuse of discretion. The district court denied Washington’s motion after assessing the applicable 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors and sufficiently explained its reasons for the denial. See United States v. High , 997 F.3d 181, 188

- 91 (4th Cir. 2021) (discussing amount of explanation required for denial of compassionate release motion). We therefore affirm the distr ict court ’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED USCA4 Appeal: 21-6929 Doc: 13 Filed: 01/11/2022 Pg: 2 of 2
Appendix O 

Federal Land Manager Consultation 
Appendix O

Federal Land Manager Consultation 

40 CFR 51.308(i)(2) requires the State to provide each FLM with an opportunity for 

consultation, in person and at least 60 days prior to holding a public hearing on a SIP 

revision. The consultation must include the opportunity for the FLM to discuss their: 

• assessment of visibility impairment in the Class I area 

• recommendations on the development of the reasonable progress goal and on the 

development and implementation of strategies to address visibility impairment 

Georgia EPD provided the FLMs (USFS, FWS, and NPS) with opportunities for 

consultation by way of packages mailed on December 18, 2008, and received by the 

agencies on December 22, 2008. Each package included a cover letter and a copy of the 

draft prehearing SIP on compact disk (CD). 

A face-to-face meeting was held with USFS personnel on January 14, 2009, at their 

offices in Gainesville, Georgia. USFS’ written comments on the SIP were received by 

Georgia EPD on March 2, 2009 (see Subappendix O.1). A teleconference was held on 

January 22, 2009, with FWS personnel in their offices at Lakewood, Colorado. By prior 

agreement, the FWS and NPS submitted their comments jointly. These were received by 

EPD on February 17, 2009 (see Subappendix O.2). EPD’s responses to the comments 

from the FLMs are presented in Subappendix O.3.
No. 48692.

#### Protest 85091-K of A. D. Cohen Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

The record showed that certain items aré similar to-those involved in Abstract 47291. The protest was therefore sustained as to-those items.
Exhibit 4.11


 


 


 


Uniroyal Global Engineered Products,
Inc.


 


Description of Registered Securities
Pursuant to Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934


 


 


 


As of March 16, 2022, Uniroyal Global Engineered Products, Inc. (the
“Company”) has 92,000,000 authorized shares of ordinary common stock (“common stock”), $0.001 par value that are
registered under Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Holders of the Company’s common stock are entitled
to one vote per share on all matters voted on by the stockholders and are entitled to receive dividends, if any, as may be declared by
the Company’s board of directors in its discretion out of funds legally available for the payment of dividends. The Company’s
common stock is traded on the OTCQB Market under the symbol UNIR.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In Connection with the Quarterly Report of Tower Properties Company (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Thomas R. Willard, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
          15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


/s/ Thomas R. Willard
-----------------------------------
Thomas R. Willard
Chief Executive Officer

November 14, 2005


                                       28
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Union Tank Car Company (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mark J. Garrette, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 
| | 

| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|
|

In witness whereof, I have executed this certification as of the 13thday of August, 2003.



/s/ Mark J.
Garrette

Mark J. Garrette

Principal
Financial Officer
No. 64336.

protests 59/8637, etc. (Buffalo).

#### C. J. Tower & Sons of Buffalo, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of prepared or preserved pork similar in all material respects to that the subject of *C. J. Tower & Sons*v. *United States*(43 Cust. Ct. 36, C.D. 2100), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 53738.

protests 119868-K and 124582-K (New York).

#### Park & Tilford Import Corp. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

For the reasons stated in *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C. D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained. •
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE BODY OF THE ACCOMPANYING
FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           6,128
<SECURITIES>                                     3,192
<RECEIVABLES>                                   35,406
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     39,657
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               100,763
<PP&E>                                         119,017
<DEPRECIATION>                                  85,697
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 191,616
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           46,316
<BONDS>                                          4,115
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        14,374
<OTHER-SE>                                      96,502
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   191,616
<SALES>                                        101,102
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               102,188
<CGS>                                           71,942
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   95,618
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,343
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  24
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,203
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,465
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,738
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,738
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .30
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .30



</TABLE>
# EUR-Lex - - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

#

**Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.4671 — UTC/Initial ESG) Text with EEA relevance **

*
Official Journal C 248 , 23/10/2007 P. 0004 - 0004 *

20071023

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4671 — UTC/Initial ESG)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 248/03)

On 25 June 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

- from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

- in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4671. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

--------------------------------------------------
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**I, Bruce M. Zorich, Chief Executive Officer of United Components, Inc. certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of United Components, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this quarterly report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presentedin this quarterly report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which the report is being prepared;b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controls over financialreporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrols over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.Date: November 14, 2006         By:                            /s/ BRUCE M. ZORICH   Name:  Bruce M. Zorich   Title:  Chief Executive Officer
----

|            |
|------------|
|            |  |
| (Mark One) |
| þ     | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |
|   | OR |
| ¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |

|                                                                |
|----------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                |  |
| Delaware                                                       | 75-0225040 |
| (State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|                                                           |   |
| 2525 Stemmons Freeway, Dallas, Texas                           | 75207-2401 |
| (Address of principal executive offices)                       | (Zip Code) |

----

----

----

|                          |
|--------------------------|
|                          |  |  |
| TRINITY INDUSTRIES, INC. | By | /s/ S. Theis Rice |
| Registrant               |   |   |
|                     |   | S. Theis Rice |
|                     |   | Senior Vice President and |
|                     |   | Chief Legal Officer |
|                     |   | August 7, 2013 |
#### Daniel F. Young, Inc. *v.*United States

No. 6387.

Entry No. 746462, etc.

Invoices dated London, England, March 3, 1942, etc.

Certified March 7, 1942, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., April 9, 1942, etc.

(Decided September 27, 1946)

*Barnes, Richardson & Colburn (Hadley 8. King*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Kincheloe, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto: ‘

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
# Official Journal C 480/16 D

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 480 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6516 December 2022 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 480

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6516 December 2022

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2022/C 480/01 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| 2022/C 480/02 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections | 16 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2022/C 480/01

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  )

1

1

2022/C 480/02

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections

16

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

April 28, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
135672 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 135672 COA: 273644 Macomb CC: 2006-000173-FC NATHANIEL TYRONE GILBERT, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 20, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

l0421 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 28, 2008

Clerk
# Search

## Geography 

          - South Sudan(1)
          - West Africa(1)

## Report Type 

          - Alert(4)
          - Special Report(14)
          - Integrated Food Security Analysis(8) - Food Security Outlook (FSO)(1)
- Food Security Outlook Update (FSOU)(5)
- (-)Food Assistance Outlook Brief (FAOB)(2)
 
          - Markets & Trade(1) - Price Watch (PW)(1)
 

## Date Range

          -  
          -  

## Topic

          - Integrated food security analysis(2)

## Language

          - English(2)

# Search

Executive Brief: Darfur Outlook, August 2010

EXECUTIVE BRIEF: EASTERN BASIN OF WEST AFRICA
## KAYR. HAGAIM NORTH CAROLINA 

# United States Senate

WASHINGTON, DC 20510-3309 COMMITTEES: ARMED SERVICES BANKING, HOUSING, AND URBAN AFFAIRS HEALTH, EDUCATION, LABOR, AND PENSIONS SMALL BUSINESS AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP



# May 21, 2014
The Honorable Gina McCarthy Administrator Environmental Protection Agency 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20460 Dear Administrator McCarthy, I write to request that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) provide at least a 120- day comment period for the upcoming proposal to regulate greenhouse gas emissions from existing power plants.
Addressing carbon emissions from existing generation units presents challenges and opportunities. It will almost certainly be among the most technically complex regulations to be considered under the Clean Air Act. While the science on the reality of global warming is clear, any effort to reduce carbon emissions will benefit from collaboration and dialogue between diverse stakeholders and interested parties. Balancing environmental priorities with economic and technological challenges are paramount to the ultimate success of any rule seeking to combat global warming. I believe that providing ample opportunity for diverse viewpoints to be shared on this forthcoming proposal is a means toward achieving that objective. Thank you for your consideration of this request. Sincerely,

Kay R. Hagan United States Senator

521 Dirksen Senate Office Building

Washington, DC 20510-3309 (202)224-6342 701 Green Valley Road, Suite 201 Greensboro, NC 27408 (336)333-5311 Toll Free: (877) 852-9462 310 New Bern Avenue Raleigh, NC 27601

(919)856-4630 1520 South Boulevard, Suite 205 Charlotte, NC 28203

(704) 334-2448

82 Patton Avenue, Suite 635 Asheville, NC 28801

(828)257-6510 website: www.hagan.senate.gov e-mail: www.hagan.senate.gov/contact

PRINTED ON RECYCLED paper 301 South Evans Street, Suite 102 Greenville, NC 27858 (252)754-0707