alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Commercial Mortgage  Servicing**D1050-084, 8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|--------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

 

Reference is hereby made tothat certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of November 1, 2015, byand among DEUTSCHE MORTGAGE & ASSET RECEIVING CORPORATION, as Depositor,WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, LNR PARTNERS, LLC,as Special Servicer, WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, WELLSFARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator, Paying Agentand Custodian, and PARK BRIDGE LENDER SERVICES LLC, as Operating Advisor withrespect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, COMM 2015-LC23 (the"Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise definedshall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 10.11 ofthis Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of CommercialMortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1. A review of the activitiesof the Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2016 through December31, 2016 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance per the Agreementduring such period has been made under my supervision, and

 

2. To the best of my knowledge,based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligationsunder the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, theundersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2017.

 

 

/s/ Daniel Bober

Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President

Wells Fargo Bank

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll go  far |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------|
No. 64334.

protests 59/6498, etc. (Buffalo).

#### C. J. Tower & Sons of Buffalo, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of prepared or preserved pork similar in all material respects to that the subject of *C. J. Tower & Sons*v. *United States*(43 Cust. Ct. 36, C.D. 2100), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 62025.

#### Hamilton Import Corp. *v.*United States,

protest 314280-K (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

The protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**Certification
      of Chief Financial Officer**


**pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted**


**pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002** ****




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of NYFIX, Inc. for the
      quarterly period ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Steven R. Vigliotti, as Chief
      Financial Officer of NYFIX, Inc., hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that, to the best of his knowledge the Report fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
      and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of NYFIX,
      Inc.




Dated:
      August 15, 2007


By: 
                          /s/
                          Steven R. VigliottiSteven
                    R. VigliottiChief
                          Financial
                          Officer
(Reap. Dec. 10263)

#### Bruce Duncan Co., Inc., a/c U.S. Asiatic Company *v.*United States

Entry No. DE-25299.

(Decided May 15, 1962)

*Stein & ShostaJc (Marjorie M. ShostaJc*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*William B. OrrioJc, Jr.,*Assistant Attorney General *(James F. O’Bara,*trial attorney), for the defendant.

DoNloN, Judge:

On call of this case at the term of court in Los Angeles on February 2, 1962, counsel stipulated, in open court, that the merchandise covered by the entry in this appeal for reappraisement, was entered after February 27, 1958, the effective date of the final list published by the Secretary of the Treasury, T.D. 54521, under section 6(a) of the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, 70 Stat. 943, T.D. 54165. The case was submitted on a further written stipulation of counsel for the parties, filed of record, as follows:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the respective parties hereto, subject to the approval of the Court, that the merchandise covered by the appeal for reappraisement enumerated in the attached Schedule of Cases consists of earthenware articles other than beer steins, and that, at the time of its exportation to the United States, the prices at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantity and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, including the cost of containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition packed ready for shipment to the United States, were the invoiced unit values.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the merchandise the subject of the appeal for reappraisement enumerated in the attached Schedule, *669to wit, earthenware articles other than beer steins, is not included on the list of articles designated by the Secretary of the Treasury in T.D. 54521 as provided for in Sec. 6(a) of the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, Public Law 927, 84th Congress, and that said merchandise is subject to appraisement under Section 402 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956.

Accepting these two stipulations as an agreed statement of facts, I find and hold that export value, as defined in section 402(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, *supra,*is the proper basis for determination of the values of the earthenware articles other than beer steins, described on the invoices covered by the entry in this appeal for reappraisement, and that such values of the respective items of merchandise are the invoice unit values, as shown on the invoices which are included in the official papers filed with the court in this suit.

As to all other merchandise, this appeal for reappraisement is dismissed.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
No. 40328.

#### Protest 226280-G of R. H. Macy & Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

Prom the record it was found that certain items consist of articles in chief value of cellulose filaments similar to the merchandise involved in Abstract 37230. The claim at 60 percent under paragraph 31 was therefore sustained.
No. 44179.

#### Protests 743905-G, etc., of Louis Marbe Cohn et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Brown, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of *Cohn*v. *United States*(4 Cust. Ct. 166, C. D. 314) the merchandise in question was held dutiable at 33 cents per pound and 45 percent ad valorem under paragraph 1115 (a) as claimed.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

EN/Research

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

In the Matter of: HUNSDON CARY

STEWART,

 Debtor.

HUNSDON CARY STEWART,

 Appellant,

 v.

ROYA BATMANGHELICH,

 Appellee.

No. 08-60012

BAP No. CC-07-01004-MoDBa

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the Ninth Circuit

Bankruptcy Appellate Panel

Montali, Dunn, and Baum, Bankruptcy Judges, Presiding

Submitted March 16, 2010** 

FILED

APR 01 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
EN/Research 2 08-60012

Before: SCHROEDER, PREGERSON, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

 Chapter 13 debtor Hunsdon Cary Stewart appeals pro se from the

Bankruptcy Appellate Panel’s (“BAP”) order affirming the bankruptcy court’s

decision denying Stewart’s objection to a proof of claim filed by his former wife,

Roya Batmanghelich. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 158(d). We

review independently the bankruptcy court’s rulings on appeal from the BAP. 

Diamant v. Kasparian (In re S. Cal. Plastics, Inc.), 165 F.3d 1243, 1245 (9th Cir.

1999). We affirm.

The bankruptcy court did not err when it denied Stewart’s objections to

Batmanghelich’s proof of claim because Stewart failed to come forward with

evidence that rebutted the proof of claim’s prima facie validity. See id. at 1248

(stating that “debtor must come forward with evidence to rebut the presumption of

validity” of a proof of claim).

Stewart’s remaining contentions are unpersuasive.

AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 508 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 508

     Designating October 20, 2006, as ``National Mammography Day''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 13, 2006

  Mr. Biden (for himself, Mr. Vitter, Mrs. Murray, Mr. Santorum, Mr. 
   Brownback, Mr. Inhofe, Ms. Collins, Mr. Johnson, Mr. Cochran, Mr. 
  Voinovich, Mr. Specter, Mr. Grassley, Mr. Leahy, Mr. Allen, and Mr. 
   Nelson of Nebraska) submitted the following resolution; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

                             July 12, 2006

             Committee discharged; considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
     Designating October 20, 2006, as ``National Mammography Day''.

Whereas, according to the American Cancer Society, in 2006, 212,920 women will 
        be diagnosed with breast cancer and 40,970 women will die from that 
        disease;
Whereas it is estimated that about 2,000,000 women were diagnosed with breast 
        cancer in the 1990s, and that, in nearly 500,000 of those cases, the 
        cancer resulted in death;
Whereas African-American women suffer a 30 percent greater mortality rate from 
        breast cancer than White women and more than a 100 percent greater 
        mortality rate from breast cancer than women from Hispanic, Asian, and 
        American Indian populations;
Whereas the risk of breast cancer increases with age, with a woman at age 70 
        having twice as much of a chance of developing the disease as a woman at 
        age 50;
Whereas at least 80 percent of the women who get breast cancer have no family 
        history of the disease;
Whereas mammograms, when operated professionally at a certified facility, can 
        provide safe screening and early detection of breast cancer in many 
        women;
Whereas mammography is an excellent method for early detection of localized 
        breast cancer, which has a 5-year survival rate of more than 97 percent;
Whereas the National Cancer Institute and the American Cancer Society continue 
        to recommend periodic mammograms; and
Whereas the National Breast Cancer Coalition recommends that each woman and her 
        health care provider make an individual decision about mammography: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) designates October 20, 2006, as ``National Mammography 
        Day''; and
            (2) encourages the people of the United States to observe 
        the day with appropriate programs and activities.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 79 (Wednesday, April 25, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 20550]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-7794]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States. 
Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained 
from the National Information Center website at http://www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than May 18, 2007.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas (W. Arthur Tribble, Vice 
President) 2200 North Pearl Street, Dallas, Texas 75201-2272:
    1. Professional Capital, Inc., Dallas, Texas, and Professional 
Capital of Delaware, Inc., Wilmington, Delaware; to acquire up to 20 
percent of the voting shares of Pioneer Bank, SSB, Dripping Springs, 
Texas (in organization).

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, April 19, 
2007.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. E7-7794 Filed 4-24-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-7460
ISAIAH T. FEASTER, Petitioner - Appellant, versus KATHLEEN GREEN, Warden, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-05- 2367) Submitted: March 30, 2006 Decided: April 6, 2006 Before TRAXLER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Isaiah T. Feaster, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Isaiah T. Feaster appeals the district court’s order denying his petition for writ of error coram nobis. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. SeeFeaster v. Green , No. CA-05-2367 (D. Md. Sept. 8, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONPursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002**

 

I, James H. Perry,as Chief Financial Officer of United Industrial Corporation (the “Company”)certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted by Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

a.               theaccompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly periodended March 31, 2006 as filed with the U.S. Securities and ExchangeCommission (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

b.              theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: May 10,2006

 
| /s/ James H. Perry                       |   |
|------------------------------------------|--------|
| James H. Perry                           |   |
| Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, |   |
| and Controller                           |   |

 

----
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstancesset forth in 5THCIR. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

For the Fifth Circuit

No. 96-40791

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

VERSUS

GUADALUPE NMI COLUNGA-PEREZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Southern District of Texas

(M-96-CR-014-06)

August 15, 1997

Before WISDOM, KING and WIENER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Guadalupe Colunga-Perez appeals his conviction for

conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute more than 1,000

kilograms of marijuana and possession with intent to distribute

more than 1,000 kilograms of marijuana. The defendant contends

that the district court erred in denying his motion to suppress
2

the marijuana found on his property. He argues that the

officers’ conduct before he was read his Miranda rights and

handcuffed amounted to a warrantless arrest without probable

cause. The defendant maintains that, as a result, his consent to

search was not voluntarily given and the marijuana subsequently

discovered was the fruit of an illegal arrest.

Our review of the district court’s ruling on the motion to

suppress is for clear error. United States v. Gonzales, 79 F.3d

413, 419 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 117 S.Ct. 183 (1996).

We conclude that the conduct of the officers in this case

did not constitute an arrest before the defendant consented to

the search of his property. Although approximately ten officers

were on the property, only two were near the defendant when he

consented to the search. The officers did not threaten or

physically restrain the defendant. The defendant was informed

that the officers did not have a search warrant and that he had

the right to refuse the request for consent to search the

property. Colunga-Perez signed a written consent form and was

described by the officers as being very cooperative. Finally,

the defendant was not handcuffed until the marijuana had been

confiscated and he had been apprised of his Miranda rights. In

the light of these facts, we are unable to say that the district

court’s ruling was clearly erroneous. See United States v.

Valdiosera-Godinez, 932 F.2d 1093 (5th Cir. 1991).
3

AFFIRMED.
August 10, 1943

No. 48682.

Suit 4425.

#### Thos. *Cook & Son-Wagons-Lits, Inc.*v. *United States.*

C. D. 705 affirmed. C. A. D. 245.
# Amtsblatt C 97A/18.

| | ISSN 1725-2407 |
| --- | --- |
| Amtsblatt
  der Europäischen Union | C 97A |
| | |
| Ausgabe in deutscher Sprache | Mitteilungen und Bekanntmachungen | 51. Jahrgang18. April 2008 |

ISSN 1725-2407

Amtsblatt

der Europäischen Union

C 97A

Ausgabe in deutscher Sprache

Mitteilungen und Bekanntmachungen

51. Jahrgang18. April 2008

---

| Inhalt | Seite |
| --- | --- |
| | V   Bekanntmachungen |
| | VERWALTUNGSVERFAHREN |
| | Europäisches Amt für Personalauswahl (EPSO) |
| 2008/C 97 A/01 | Reservelisten — Allgemeines Auswahlverfahren EPSO/AST/27/06: Assistentinnen und Assistenten (AST 1) deutscher Sprache (DE) für Sekretariatstätigkeiten | 1 |
| 2008/C 97 A/02 | Reservelisten — Allgemeines Auswahlverfahren EPSO/AD/51/06: Rechts- und Sprachsachverständige (AD 7) deutscher Sprache | 3 |

Inhalt

Seite

V   Bekanntmachungen

VERWALTUNGSVERFAHREN

Europäisches Amt für Personalauswahl (EPSO)

2008/C 97 A/01

Reservelisten — Allgemeines Auswahlverfahren EPSO/AST/27/06: Assistentinnen und Assistenten (AST 1) deutscher Sprache (DE) für Sekretariatstätigkeiten

1

2008/C 97 A/02

Reservelisten — Allgemeines Auswahlverfahren EPSO/AD/51/06: Rechts- und Sprachsachverständige (AD 7) deutscher Sprache

3

---

| | Berichtigungen |
| --- | --- |
| 2008/C 97 A/03 | Berichtigung der allgemeinen Stellenausschreibung PE/96/S ( ABl. C 258 A vom 31.10.2007 ) | 4 |

Berichtigungen

2008/C 97 A/03

Berichtigung der allgemeinen Stellenausschreibung PE/96/S ( ABl. C 258 A vom 31.10.2007 )

4

---

| DE | |
| --- | --- |

DE
Case: 2:12-cv-01183-EAS-EPD Doc #: 55 Filed: 11/15/13 Page: 1 of 1  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-12T13:30:03-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

In connection with this quarterly report of Torotel, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending October 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, H. James Serrone, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

 

(1)        The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)        The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| /s/ H. James Serrone    |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
|                    |   |
|                    |   |
| H. James Serrone        |   |
| Chief Financial Officer |   |
| December 15, 2010  |   |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                              5                      
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000,000
       
<S>                                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                               JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                 SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                               195
<SECURITIES>                                       1,750
<RECEIVABLES>                                      2,599
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                       0
<PP&E>                                             3,474
<DEPRECIATION>                                     1,573
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    55,444
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                  0
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                              62
<OTHER-SE>                                         5,167
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      55,444
<SALES>                                                0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   4,592
<CGS>                                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      2,991
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      38
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   312
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      659
<INCOME-TAX>                                         229
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  430
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                         430
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       6.86
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       6.60
        



</TABLE>