alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

**EXHIBIT      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO **

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350, **

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO **

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | · | the                Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended                June 30,                2005, (the “Report”), which this certification accompanies, fully complies                with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities                Exchange                Act of 1934; and |
|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | · | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/                  Bruce W. Marlow                   |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Bruce                  W. Marlow                       |   |
| President                  and Chief Executive Officer |   |

| /s/                  Lawrence P. Bascom                         |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Lawrence                  P. Bascom                             |   |
| Sr.                  Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |   |

----
```

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                RULE 13a-14(b) AND 15d-14(b) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT

In connection with the Quarterly  Report of NYFIX,  Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the  period  ending  March 31,  2005 as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof  (the  "Report"),  I, Peter K.  Hansen,
Chairman,  President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

   (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
       of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   (2) The information  contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
       respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results of  operations  of the
       Company.

/s/ Peter K. Hansen
----------------------------------------------
Peter K. Hansen
Chairman, President and
Chief Executive Officer
June 29, 2005

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to NYFIX, Inc. and will be retained by NYFIX, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This  certification  accompanies  this  Report  pursuant  to Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and  shall not be deemed  filed by the  Company  for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
```
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 11

<TABLE>
MARK TWAIN BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
<CAPTION>
                                                           For The Three Months Ended
                                                                    March 31,          
(in thousands of dollars except per share data)              1997              1996    
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                        <C>              <C>       
PRIMARY 
Earnings:  
 Net income                                                   $14,659          $12,521
-----------------------------------------------------------===========================        

Shares: 
 Weighted average number of common shares outstanding      16,796,703       16,206,002
 Weighted average number of common share equivalents          396,109          285,953
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                           17,192,812       16,491,955
-----------------------------------------------------------===========================

Primary earnings per common share                               $0.85            $0.76
-----------------------------------------------------------===========================


ASSUMING FULL DILUTION
Earnings:
 Net income                                                   $14,659          $12,521 
 After tax interest applicable to convertible notes                22               31
 After tax amortization of capital note fees                        2               39 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Fully diluted net income                                    $14,683          $12,591
-----------------------------------------------------------===========================

Shares:
 Weighted average number of common shares outstanding      16,796,703       16,206,002
 Assuming conversion of Convertible Notes and dilutive
  stock options                                               522,635          571,247
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                           17,319,338       16,777,249
-----------------------------------------------------------===========================

Earnings per common share assuming full dilution                $0.85            $0.75
-----------------------------------------------------------===========================
</TABLE>
No. 40347.

#### Protests 758106-G, etc., of New York Merchandise Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Sullivan, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of *May*v. *United States*(T. D. 47760) and *Woolworth*v. *United States*(T. D. 48573) the tennis rackets in question were held dutiable at 30 percent under paragraph 1502 as claimed.
Before the Second Division,

June 13, 1945

No. 50249.

#### Protests 932315-G, etc., of Albert Eckstein & Co., Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

It was stipulated that certain items of the merchandise consist of racello hats similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 47291, and that certain other items consist of hats of sisal hemp similar to those involved in *United States*v. *Schwab*(30 C. C. P. A. 72, C. A. D. 218), which records were admitted in evidence herein. In accordance therewith the items of merchandise in question were held dutiable as claimed.
No. 54852.

#### J. A. Hunter Hardwood Corp. *v.*United States,

protest 160352-K (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of sawed dagame lumber similar in all material respects to that the subject of *John A. Hunter Hardwood Corp.*v. *United States*(21 Cust. Ct. 139, C. D. 1143), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T S AL VA DO R L OP E Z - P E NA , P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 09- 73297 A ge nc yN o. A 098- 409- 071 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o a r do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d F e bruary11, 2013 ** B e f o r e : F E RN A N D E Z , T A S H I M A , an dW A R D L A W , C ir c u it Ju d g e s . S a l va dorL ope z - P e na , ana t i ve a nd c i t i z e n of M e xi c o, pe t i t i ons f

orr e vi e w of the B oa r d of

I m m i gr a t i on A ppe a l s ’ ( “ B I A ” ) or de rs us t a i ni ng the D e partm e ntof H o m e lan dS e c u r ity ’s ap p e a l f r o m a n im m ig r a tio n ju d g e ’s d e c is io n g r an tin g h is ap p lic a tio n f

o rc a n c e lla tio n o f

r e m o v a l. O u rju r is d ic tio n is g o v e rn e db y8 U .S .C .



# FI LED FEB 13 2 013 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS09- 73297 2 § 1 2 5 2 . We d i s m i s s th e p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w. W e l ac k j uri sdi ct i on t o revi ew the B IA ’ s di sc re t i on ary det erm i nat i on that L o p e z - P e n af

a ile dto s h o w e x c e p tio n a l an de x tr e m e lyu n u s u a l h ar d s h ip to h is q u a lif y in g r e la tiv e s . See M

a rt i n ez-R o sa s v. G o n za les, 42 4 F . 3d 92 6, 93 0 (9th C i r. 2005) . L ope z - P e na ’ s c ont e nt i on tha tthe B I A appl i e d an i nc orr e c ts t anda r d of re vi ew i s notsupp ort ed by the re cord and d oes notpres enta c ol orabl e c l ai m that e s tab lis h e s o u rju r is d ic tio n . Se e i d. P E T I T I O N F O R R E V I E W D I S M I S S E D .
From: Frey, Nathan J. <Nathan_J._Frey@omb.eop.gov>
Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2015 2:57 PM
To: Culligan, Kevin; Harvey, Reid
Cc: Vasu, Amy; Szabo, Aaron Subject: Summary of Interagency Comments Under EO 12866 and 13563 -- CPP draft final rule

Attached please find data set submitted by interagency reviewers on the CPP draft final rule.

Thanks and please let me know if you have any questions.

Nathan

<< Summaryofinteragencycomment sunderEO12866_13563_2060-AR33_7232015.docx.xlsx >>
# C_2004274EN.01S00301.xml

| 9.11.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 274/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.11.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 274/s3

---

1 November 2004 — New version of EUR-Lex!

europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex/

The new site incorporates the Celex service and provides free and easy access in 20 languages to the largest documentary database on EU law.

---
# Official Journal C 72A/2010

| | ISSN 1725-2423
  doi:10.3000/17252423.CA2010.072.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 72A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5320 March 2010 |

ISSN 1725-2423

doi:10.3000/17252423.CA2010.072.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 72A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5320 March 2010

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2010/C 072A/01 | Common catalogue of varieties of agricultural plant species — second supplement to the 28th complete edition | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2010/C 072A/01

Common catalogue of varieties of agricultural plant species — second supplement to the 28th complete edition

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
----

Action brought on 25 June 2004 by BIC S.A. against the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market

(Case T-263/04)

(2004/C 251/41)

Language of the case: French

An action against the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 25 June 2004 by BIC S.A., established in Clichy (France), represented by Michel-Paul Escande, lawyer.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

Pleas in law and main arguments:

----

(1)  Probably R 469/2003-4.

----
a
Document

EXHIBIT 4.7

Summary of Bpifrance Loan


On July 10, 2020, the Company entered into a State-guaranteed loan agreement (prêt garanti par l’Etat) with Bpifrance Financement to be applied to the Company’s cash flow needs. The €5 million loan has a six-year term and is 90% guaranteed by the French State. The loan bore no interest for the first 12 month period but, following such 12 month period and for the subsequent five years, bears an interest rate of 2.25% per annum, inclusive of an annual State guarantee fee of 1.61% per annum. The principal and interest of the Bpifrance PGE Loan will be repaid in 20 quarterly installments from October 31, 2021 until July 26, 2026.


The loan is prepayable, at the Company’s option, upon one month’s prior notice. Any early repayment of the loan, be it voluntary or involuntary, shall be subject to a lump-sum indemnity equal to 5% of the prepaid principal amount during the first year and reduced to 3% after this period. Bpifrance Financement’s acceptance of the early repayment is subject to the payment of the indemnity.


Bpifrance Financement may declare the loan repayable upon eight days’ prior notice as a result of the occurrence of certain events, including (i) use of the loaned funds for a purpose not authorized by the Bpifrance Financement loan, (ii) the Company’s failure to pay any amounts due under the Bpifrance Financement loan, (ii) the transfer or pledging by Company of all or part of the shares or voting rights of the Company or one of its subsidiaries without Bpifrance Financement’s prior approval, (iv) a merger, demerger or partial asset contribution with, or the winding-up of, the Company, (v) the suspension of or change in the Company’s business activities, (vi) a breach of the provisions of the Bpifrance Financement loan and (vii) misrepresentation under the Bpifrance Financement loan agreement.


The loan will become immediately repayable upon the occurrence of certain other events, including (i) a share capital reduction of the Company that is not motivated by losses, the distribution of reserves outstanding on the date of execution of the Bpifrance Financement loan or the reimbursement of a shareholders’ loan without the prior approval of Bpifrance Financement, (ii) the seizure of Company assets or the transfer of Company business undertakings and (iii) the occurrence of a material event of a legal or financial nature with significant consequences regarding the Company’s business or profitability.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

MIDDLE DISTRICT 

IN RE: ADOPTION OF K.E.S., A MINOR 

PETITION OF: A.M.S., MOTHER 

:

:

:

:

:

No. 199 MAL 2016 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 29th day of April, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED. 

IN INTEREST OF: K.E.S., A MINOR
Lydia,

OIRA has concluded review of EPA’s final rule Review of the Secondary National Ambient Air Quality Standards

for Oxides of Nitrogen and Oxides of Sulfur. Please let us know if you have any questions.

Once again, it’s been a pleasure working with you all!

Best Wishes,

Christine 

### OIRA Review Concluded: EPA Final Rule Review of the S econdary National Ambient Air

Quality Standards for Oxides of Nitrogen and Oxides of Sulfur

Kymn, Christine J.

to:

Lydia Wegman

03/20/2012 03:08 PM

Cc:

Ginger Tennant, John Hannon, Karen Martin, Lea Anderson, Mary Henigin, Randy Waite,

Rosalina Rodriguez, Sherry Russell

Hide Details

From: "Kymn, Christine J." <Christi ne_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov> Sort List...

To: Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: Ginger Tennant/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, John Hannon/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Karen

Martin/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Lea A nderson/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Mary

Henigin/DC/USEPA/US@EP A, Randy Waite/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Rosalina

Rodriguez/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Sher ry Russell/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

History: This message has been forwarded. Page 1 of 1

3/20/2012 file://C:\Documents and Settin g s\srussell\Local Settin g s\Tem p \notes87944B\~web7549.htm
III 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 490 

To authorize representation by the Senate Legal Counsel in the case of 

Lannak v, Biden, et al. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 23, 2006 

Mr. FRIST (for himself and Mr. REID) submitted the following resolution; 

which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

To authorize representation by the Senate Legal Counsel 

in the case of Lannak v, Biden, et al. 

Whereas, in the case of Lannak v. Biden, et al., No. 06–CV– 

0180, pending in the United States District Court for the 

District of Delaware, the plaintiff has named as defendants Senators Joseph R. Biden, Jr. and Thomas R. Carper; and 

Whereas, pursuant to sections 703(a) and 704(a)(1) of the 

Ethics in Government Act of 1978, 2 U.S.C. 288b(a) and 

288c(a)(1), the Senate may direct its counsel to defend 

Members, officers, and employees of the Senate in civil 

actions relating to their official responsibilities: Now, 

therefore, be it 


cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
2 

SRES 490 ATS

1 Resolved, That the Senate Legal Counsel is author2 ized to represent Senators Joseph R. Biden, Jr. and 

3 Thomas R. Carper in the case of Lannak v. Biden, et al. 

Æ 


cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
Order filed November 6 , 2012

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 11

- 00716

- CV

____________ MOHAMMED ZAHIRRUDIN , Appellant

V. RS 6600 SW FWY, LP , Appellee

On Appeal from the 125th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2009

- 71889



### ORDER
On October 30, 2012, appellee filed an “Agreed Motion to Dismiss Appeal.” The motion, however, is signed only by appellee’s attorney, not by appellant. We therefore
order the parties, within 10 days of the date of this order, to file a motion in compliance with the Fourteenth Court of Appeals Local Rule 4(f) (“If [an e

- filed] document requires the signature of an opposing party, the e

- filer must e

- file the document as a scanned image containing the opposing party’s signa ture.”).

PER CURIAMPanel consists of Justices Boyce, McCally, and Mirabal.
III 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 481 

Relative to the death of Jacob Chic Hecht, former United States Senator 

for the State of Nevada. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 16, 2006 

Mr. FRIST (for himself, Mr. REID, and Mr. ENSIGN) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Relative to the death of Jacob Chic Hecht, former United 

States Senator for the State of Nevada. 

Whereas Jacob Chic Hecht served as a special agent in the 

United States Army Intelligence Corps; 

Whereas Jacob Chic Hecht served the people of Nevada with 

distinction from 1983 to 1989 in the United States Senate; and 

Whereas Jacob Chic Hecht served as United States Ambassador to the Bahamas from 1989 until 1994: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate has heard with profound 

2 sorrow and deep regret the announcement of the death 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
2 

SRES 481 ATS

1 of Jacob Chic Hecht, former member of the United States 

2 Senate. 

3 Resolved, That the Secretary of the Senate commu4 nicate these resolutions to the House of Representatives 

5 and transmit an enrolled copy thereof to the family of the 

6 deceased. 

7 Resolved, That when the Senate adjourns today, it 

8 stand adjourned as a further mark of respect to the mem9 ory of the Honorable Jacob Chic Hecht. 

Æ 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT NASHVILLE

On Remand from the Tennessee Supreme Court

STATE OF TENNESSEE v. ANTHONY RIGGS

Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for Wayne County

No. 13,665 Stella Hargrove, Judge

No. M2007-02322-RM-CD - Filed May 7, 2008

JAMES CURWOOD WITT, JR., J., concurring.

I concur in the majority opinion except I would have not relied upon the presentence

report for a Blakely-type admission. See State v. Charles Vantilburg III, No.

W2006-02475-CCA-R3-CD (Tenn. Crim. App., at Jackson, Feb. 12, 2008) (holding that statements

“made outside the confines of any judicial proceeding . . . do not qualify as admissions for purposes

of the Sixth Amendment”).

___________________________________ 

JAMES CURWOOD WITT, JR., JUDGE
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDG MENT

No. 04

- 18

- 00950

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF L.J.G. , G.J.G., Z.I.G., A.A.G., and L.G.

- R.F.

From the 166th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016PA00461

Honorable Laura Salinas, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE CHAPA

, JUSTICE RIOS , AND JUSTICE WATKINS

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED.

We ORDER no costs assessed against appellant.

SIGNED April 10, 2019.

_________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa , Justice
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>           5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           42,965
<SECURITIES>                                  5,042,512
<RECEIVABLES>                                 1,200,977
<ALLOWANCES>                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              9,739,242
<PP&E>                                       90,778,491
<DEPRECIATION>                               30,770,705
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               74,471,339
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         3,922,066
<BONDS>                                      41,757,478
<COMMON>                                        183,430
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<OTHER-SE>                                   26,866,372
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 74,471,339
<SALES>                                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              8,770,969
<CGS>                                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 6,022,111
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  8,017
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            1,638,700
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               1,102,141
<INCOME-TAX>                                    432,980
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             669,161
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                    669,161
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      3.75
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      3.75
        

</TABLE>
Douglas 

La a • 

Parraguirre 

GISTARVE RUFFIN, JR., 

Appellant, 

vs. 

THE STATE OF NEVADA, 

Respondent. 

No. 68248 

ORDER DISMISSING APPEALS 

These are pro se appeals from judgments of conviction. 

Second Judicial District Court, Washoe County; Jerome M. Polaha, Judge. 

The notices of appeal were untimely filed. NRAP 4(b); NRS 

34.575(1); NRAP 26(a); NRAP 26(c). Because an untimely notice of appeal 

fails to vest jurisdiction in this court, Lozada v. State, 110 Nev. 349, 352, 

871 P.2d 944, 946 (1994), we conclude that we lack jurisdiction to consider 

these appeals, and we 

ORDER these appeals DISMISSED. 

cc: Hon. Jerome M. Polaha, District Judge 

Gistarve Ruffin, Jr. 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Washoe County District Attorney 

Washoe District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

2 

(0) 194 7A Arlo