alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsPreliminary study of niobium alloy contamination by transport through heliumPreliminary tests were conducted to determine if interstitial element transport through a circulating helium working fluid was a potential problem in Brayton and Stirling space power systems. Test specimens exposed to a thermal gradient for up to 3000-hr included Nb-1%Zr, a Sm-Co alloy (referred to as SmCo in this paper), Hiperco 50 steel, and alumina to simulate various engine components of the Brayton and Stirling systems. Results indicate that helium transport of interstitial contaminants can be minimized over a 7-yr life with a monometallic Nb-1%Zr design. Exposure with other materials indicated a potential for interstitial contaminant transport. Determination of contamination kinetics and the effects on structural integrity will require additional testing.Document ID19870008451Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference PaperAuthorsScheuermann, Coulson M.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Moore, Thomas J.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Wheeler, Donald R.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1987Subject CategoryMetallic MaterialsReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:88952DOE/NASA/16310-2NASA-TM-88952E-3401Accession Number87N17884Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: DE-AI03-86SF-16310Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19870008451.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and § 225.41 of the Board’s Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).

The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for inspection at the office of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later than May 8, 2007.

**A. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas**                     (W. Arthur Tribble, Vice President) 2200 North Pearl Street, Dallas, Texas 75201-2272:                

*1. Harry Lynn and Oksana Williams*, Plano, Texas; to acquire additional voting shares of Snook Bancshares, Inc., Snook, Texas, and indirectly acquire additional voting shares of First Bank of Snook, Snook, Texas.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, April 18, 2007.

Robert deV. Frierson,

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. E7-7657 Filed 4-20-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 

In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) announces the aforementioned meeting. 

*Time and Date:*                         12 p.m.-2 p.m., May 15, 2007 (Closed).                     

*Place:*                         Teleconference.                     

*Status:*                         The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with provisions set forth in Section 552b(c)(4) and (6), Title 5 U.S.C., and the Determination of the Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, CDC, pursuant to Public Law 92-463.                     

*Matters to be Discussed:*                         The meeting will include the review, discussion, and evaluation of “The Sexual Networks of African American STI Repeaters, an Elaboration of Risk,” PEP 2007-R-01, and “Dynamic Mathematical Modeling of Sexual Transmission of C. Trachomatis Transmission in the United States, Evaluating Impact on Prevention Strategies on Chlamydial Incidence, Prevalence and Sequelae,” PEP 2007-R-02.                     

*Contact Person for More Information:*                         Susan Goodman, D.D.S., Scientific Review Administrator, Office of the Chief Science Officer, CDC, 1600 Clifton Road NE., Mailstop D74, Atlanta, GA 30333, Telephone 404-639-4940.                    

                        The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been delegated the authority to sign                         **Federal Register**                         notices pertaining to announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, for both CDC and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.                     

Dated: April 13, 2007. 

Elaine L. Baker, 

Acting Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 

 [FR Doc. E7-7503 Filed 4-19-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
# C_2016419EN.01002301.xml

| 14.11.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 419/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.11.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 419/23

---

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 14 September 2016 — Ori Martin SA C-490/15 P), Siderurgica Latina Martin SpA (SLM) (C-505/15 P) v European Commission

(Joined Cases C-490/15 P and C-505/15 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - European prestressing steel market - Fines - Setting of the fines - Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 - Article 23(2) - Presumption of actual exercise of decisive influence by the parent company over the subsidiary - The 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines - Principle of non-retroactivity - Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Article 47 - Right to an effective remedy within a reasonable time - Charter of Fundamental Rights - Article 41 - Right to proceedings being conducted within a reasonable time))

(2016/C 419/30)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Appellants: Ori Martin SA (C-490/15 P), Siderurgica Latina Martin SpA (SLM) (C-505/15 P) (represented by: G. Belotti and P. Ziotti, avvocati)

Appellants:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: V. Bottka, G. Conte and P. Rossi, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeals in cases C-490/15 P and C-505/15 P; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeals in cases C-490/15 P and C-505/15 P;

| 2. | Orders Ori Martin SA to pay the costs in Case C-490/15 P; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Ori Martin SA to pay the costs in Case C-490/15 P;

| 3. | Orders Siderurgica Latina Martin SpA (SLM) to pay the costs in Case C-505/15 P. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Siderurgica Latina Martin SpA (SLM) to pay the costs in Case C-505/15 P.

---

(1)  OJ C 406, 7.12.2015.

1

---
**Exhibit 12.2**

**302 CERTIFICATION**

I,Ramiro Alfonsín B., certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Endesa Américas S.A.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary tomake the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have: 

(a) Designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b) Evaluated theeffectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the company’s auditors and the audit committee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in thecompany’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: April 29, 2016
No. 46883.

#### Protest 836162-G of New York Mdse. Co. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

It was stipulated-that the atomizers in question are composed in chief value of decorated glass and are similar to those the subject of Abstract 44140. The claim at 60 percent under paragraph 218 (f) was therefore sustained.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

EASTERN DIVISION 

JENNIFER D. BROWN, : 

 : 

 Plaintiff, : Case No. 2:12-CV-511 

 : 

 v. : JUDGE ALGENON L. MARBLEY 

 : 

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY : Magistrate Judge King 

 : 

 Defendant. : 

ORDER 

This matter is before the Court on the United States Magistrate Judge’s Report and 

Recommendation. (Doc. 18). On December 26, 2013, the Magistrate Judge issued the Report 

and Recommendation, recommending that Plaintiff’s unopposed Motion for Attorney’s Fees 

(Doc. 17) be granted. The parties were specifically advised of their right to object to this Report 

and Recommendation, and of the consequences of their failure to do so. (Doc. 18 at 5). The 

parties have failed to respond. The deadline for objections lapsed on January 13, 2014. 

 The Court hereby ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation based on the independent 

consideration of the analysis therein. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Motion for Attorney’s Fees is 

GRANTED in the amount of $2811.38. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 s/ Algenon L. Marbley 

 ALGENON L. MARBLEY 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

DATED: April 22, 2014

Case: 2:12-cv-00511-ALM-NMK Doc #: 19 Filed: 04/22/14 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
NOT RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION

File Name: 14a0807n.06

No. 14-1293

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

JOSEPH HUBBARD,

 Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, FA et al.,

 Defendants-Appellees. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED 

STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

OPINION

Before: BATCHELDER, GILMAN, and GIBBONS, Circuit Judges.

RONALD LEE GILMAN, Circuit Judge. In October 2006, Joseph Hubbard took out a 

loan from Washington Mutual Bank to buy a house with his girlfriend. He stopped making 

regular payments on the loan in March 2008, and the house was sold to Federal National 

Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae) at a nonjudicial foreclosure sale in September 2010. 

Hubbard did not take any action in response to the sale until eight months later, when Fannie 

Mae initiated eviction proceedings against him. With eviction proceedings underway, Hubbard 

filed suit in the Washtenaw County Circuit Court against Washington Mutual and Fannie Mae, 

claiming that procedural flaws invalidated the foreclosure against his home. The defendants then 

removed the case to federal court. 

After months of discovery, Washington Mutual and Fannie Mae moved for summary 

judgment on all claims. The district court granted their motion. It determined that Hubbard had 
-2-

failed to present evidence of any fraud or irregularity in the foreclosure process, thus making him

subject to Michigan’s standard six-month period to redeem his house. Because Hubbard failed 

to make the required payments on the loan within that time, the court concluded that he no longer 

had “any legally cognizable interest” in the property. The court further decided that all of his 

claims were legally and factually meritless. Hubbard now appeals that decision.

After carefully considering the record on appeal, the briefs of the parties, and the 

applicable law, we agree with the district court’s grant of summary judgment to Washington 

Mutual and Fannie Mae. The issuance of a detailed written opinion by this court would be 

unduly duplicative because the reasoning that supports judgment for the defendants has been 

clearly articulated by the district court in a thorough and comprehensive opinion. Accordingly, 

the judgment rendered by the Honorable Patrick James Duggan, Jr., United States District Judge 

for the Eastern District of Michigan at Detroit, is AFFIRMED on the basis of the reasoning 

detailed in his Opinion and Order dated February 6, 2014.
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, Brian E. Schaaf, certify that:

 

1.                                     I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Ford Credit Auto Owner Trust 2016-A (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

 

2.                                     Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.                                     Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4.                                     I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

 

5.                                     All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: The Bank of New York Mellon, as indenture trustee of the issuing entity, and U.S. Bank Trust National Association, as owner trustee of the issuing entity.

 

Dated March 23, 2017

 
|   | /s/ Brian E. Schaaf                                |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------|
|   | Brian E. Schaaf                                    |
|   | Vice President and   Assistant Treasurer           |
|   | Ford Motor Credit   Company LLC, as Servicer       |
|   | (senior officer in   charge of servicing function) |

 

----
III 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 146 

Recognizing the 25th anniversary of the eruption of Mount St. Helens. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 18, 2005 

Ms. CANTWELL (for herself, Mrs. MURRAY, Mr. STEVENS, and Mr. PRYOR) 

submitted the following resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the 25th anniversary of the eruption of Mount 

St. Helens. 

Whereas, on May 18, 1980, at 8:32 a.m. Pacific Daylight 

Time, the volcano of Mount St. Helens erupted, changing 

its elevation from 9,677 feet to 8,363 feet; 

Whereas the eruption was triggered by an earthquake of 

magnitude 5.1 approximately 1 mile beneath the volcano; 

Whereas the lateral blast covered an area approximately 230 

square miles and reached as far as 17 miles northwest 

of the crater; 

Whereas the velocity of the blast was estimated to be at least 

300 miles per hour; 

Whereas the pyroclastic flows covered 6 square miles, reached 

temperatures of 1,300 degrees Fahrenheit, and moved at 

speeds between 50 and 80 miles per hour; 
2 

•SRES 146 ATS

Whereas, as a result of the eruption, over 4,000,000,000 

board-feet of timber was blown down, which is enough 

material to build about 150,000 homes; 

Whereas volcanic ash clouded the sky above eastern Washington, reached the east coast of the United States in 3 

days, and eventually circled the globe in 15 days; 

Whereas the eruption claimed the lives of 57 people; and 

Whereas tens of thousands of animals perished: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) recognizes the 25th Anniversary of the 

3 eruption of Mount St. Helens on May 18, 2005; 

4 (2) acknowledges the importance of monitoring 

5 all 169 volcanoes in the United States and its terri6 tories; 

7 (3) recognizes the invaluable work of the De8 partment of the Interior, the United States Geologi9 cal Survey, the United States Forest Service, the Di10 rectorate of Emergency Preparedness and Response 

11 of the Department of Homeland Security, and the 

12 Cascade Volcano Observatory in monitoring the ac13 tivities of Mount St. Helens; 

14 (4) acknowledges the progress in science that 

15 has led to a more comprehensive understanding of 

16 volcanology, seismology, and plate tectonics, thus en17 hancing the ability to predict volcanic activity and 

18 eruptions; and 
3 

•SRES 146 ATS

1 (5) supports monitoring volcanoes and helping 

2 to develop emergency response plans to ensure that 

3 the people and communities of the United States are 

4 safe. 

Æ
# C_2017168EN.01000701.xml

| 29.5.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 168/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.5.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 168/7

---

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 6 April 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbetsdomstolen — Sweden) — Unionen v Almega Tjänsteförbunden, ISS Facility Services AB

(Case C-336/15) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Social policy - Directive 2001/23/EC - Article 3 - Safeguarding of employees’ rights in the event of transfers of undertakings - Collective agreements applicable to the transferee and the transferor - Additional periods of notice granted to dismissed workers - Account to be taken of the length of service with the transferor))

(2017/C 168/07)

Language of the case: Swedish

Referring court

Referring court

Arbetsdomstolen

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Unionen

Applicant:

Defendants: Almega Tjänsteförbunden,

Defendants:

ISS Facility Services AB,

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 3 of Council Directive 2001/23/EC of 12 March 2001 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to the safeguarding of employees’ rights in the event of transfers of undertakings, businesses or parts of undertakings or businesses must be interpreted as meaning that, in circumstances such as those in the case in the main proceedings, the transferee must, when dismissing an employee more than one year after the transfer of the undertaking, include, in the calculation of that employee’s length of service, which is relevant for determining the period of notice to which that employee is entitled, the length of service which that employee acquired with the transferor.

---

(1)  OJ C 311, 21.9.2015.

1

---