alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Florea & Co., Inc., v. United States

No. 7417.

Invoice dated Yokohama, Japan, April 16, 1936.

Certified April 17, 1936.

Entered at New York, N. Y., May 13, 1936.

Entry No. 840447.

Second Division, Appellate Term

(Order dated October 23, 1947)

*William Whynman*for the appellant.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General *(Dorothy C. Bennett,*special attorney), for the appellee.

Before Kincheloe, Keefe, and Walker, Judges; Keefe, J., resigned; Walker, J., deceased

ORDER

Kincheloe, Judge:

An application for review of the decision of the single judge sitting in reappraisement in the above-styled case was duly filed in the Second Division of this court. The case was duly argued before a special Second Division consisting of Judges Kincheloe, *279Keefe, and Walker, in January 1944, and was duly submitted thereafter. No decision has been rendered in this case because of the fact that two other cases for the same importer and of the same character of merchandise were tried before other sitting judges in reappraisement and other divisions of this court. One of the cases is now pending in the Court of Customs and Patent Appeals. The above-styled case consisting of such a voluminous record, it was agreed that said case should not be decided' by the division until one or both of the other cases are finally disposed of. However, in view of the fact that said Judges Keefe and Walker are no longer members of this court, it is my opinion that the submission of said case should be set aside and said case should be restored to the review calendar of the Second Division for all purposes.

It is therefore ordered on my own initiative, that the submission of said case be and the same is hereby set aside and said case is hereby restored to the review calendar of the Second Division for all purposes.
EXHIBIT 99.3



                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of Consumers Financial
Corporation  (the  "Company")  for the period ended September 30, 2002, as filed
with  the  Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I,  Donald  J. Hommel, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to  18  U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge, information and
belief:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or
          15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.




Date   November 18, 2002                By /S/   Donald J. Hommel
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Donald  J.  Hommel
                                           Chief  Executive  Officer


Consumers Financial Corporation                                          Page 22
Form 10-Q                                                     September 30, 2002
<PAGE>
No. 54255.

#### Miller Harness Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 139138-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
#### Foster *versus*Pennington.

A declaration upon a contract for a specified quantity of an article, though laid under a *videlicit,*is not sustained by proof of a contract for a larger quantity.

Exceptions from the District Court in Aroostook county.

Assumpsit on an alleged contract to deliver to the plaintiff !í a certain large quantity of oats ; viz. 600 bushels.” The proof was of a contract for 1000 bushels, of which the defendant had delivered 207. The defendant’s counsel objected to the variance; but the Judge instructed the jury, that a contract to deliver 1000 bushels would sustain the declaration.

Verdict for plaintiff.

*Kelley*and *McCrillis, for*plaintiff,

relied on 2 Hill, 126. They contended that, under a *videlicit,*much latitude is allowed ; that the quantity alleged under a *videlicit*is but surplusage. *Bristow*v. Wright, 1 Smith’s Leading Cases. *179The declaration was amendable, and substantial justice has been done.

*John Hodgdon,*for defendant.

Howard, J.,

orally.—The instruction was erroneous. It made a contract for 1000 bushels to sustain a claim upon one for 600. The *videlidt*can have no such effect. There was a variance, and it was a material one.

*Exceptions sustained.*
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22

- 6757

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v.
RAYMOND EDWARD GILL , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Baltimore

. George L. Russell, III , District Judge. ( 1:86

- cr - 00011

- GLR

- 1 )

Submitted : November 17, 2022 Decided: November 23, 2022

Before KING, QUATTLEBAUM, and RUSHING , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Raymond Edward Gill, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 22-6757 Doc: 8 Filed: 11/23/2022 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM: Raymond Edward Gill filed a notice of appeal in the underlying criminal action after filing two motions for a writ of error coram nobis and a motion to amend the
aforementioned motions. T his court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28
U.S.C. § 1291, and certain interlocutory and collateral o rders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292; Fed. R.
Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541, 545

- 46 (1949). Review of the district court docket confirms that the district court has not yet ruled on the pending motions. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED USCA4 Appeal: 22-6757 Doc: 8 Filed: 11/23/2022 Pg: 2 of 2
August 10, 1939

No. 41938.

#### Protests 837292-G, etc., of Shell Eastern Petroleum Products, Inc., et al.

C. D. 189. Application by plaintiffs for rehearing denied. Brown, J., dissented.
No. 41955.

#### Protests 211392-G, etc., of Stern Bros. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

From the record it was found that certain items consist of filet laces similar to those involved in *United States*v. *Jabara*(22 C. C. P. A. 77, T. D. 47065) and Normandy laces like those the subject of *Amrein*v. *United States*(T. D. 49551). The claim at 75 percent under paragraph 1430 was therefore sustained.
No. 49373.

#### Protests 883411-G, etc., of Wing Coffee Co., Ltd. (Honolulu).

Opinion by

Cole, J.

The merchandise was classified and claimed dutiable at the rates and under the same paragraphs as similar merchandise covered by the decision in *Quong Yuen Shing*v. *United States*(31 C. C. P. A. 43, C. A. D. 247). It was conceded that the merchandise in question is a product the same in all material respects as that passed upon in said- cited case. On the established facts the merchandise was found to contain salt and was therefore excluded from paragraph 5. In accordance with said cited case the protests in question were sustained to this extent.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUL-03-1999
<CASH>                                         1,693
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  76,469
<ALLOWANCES>                                   4,007
<INVENTORY>                                    225,813
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               309,115
<PP&E>                                         316,222
<DEPRECIATION>                                 216,771
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 471,955
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          171,537
<BONDS>                                        129,395
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    1,698
<COMMON>                                       30,048
<OTHER-SE>                                     127,923
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   471,955
<SALES>                                        157,690
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               157,690
<CGS>                                          140,529
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  166,071
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (966)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               106
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             12,657
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (20,178)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (7,466)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (12,712)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                24,938
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   12,266
<EPS-BASIC>                                    .64
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .64


</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.5


 





 



    1 


     


    

 





 






    2 


     


    

 


 






    3 


     


    

 


  


 



    4 


     


    

 


 






    5 


     


    

 


 






    6 


     


    

 


 






    7 


     


    

 


 






    8 


     


    

 


 






    9 


     


    

 


 






    10 


     


    

 


 






    11 


     


    

 


 






    12 


     


    

 


 






    13 


     


    

 


 






    14 


     


    

 


 






    15 


     


    

 


 






    16 


     


    

 


 






    17 


     


    

 


 






    18 


     


    

 


 






    19 


     


    

 


 



    20
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, John C. Lawrence, President, and Chief Executive Officer of United States
Antimony Corporation (the "Company") do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to my knowledge:

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended
March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ John C. Lawrence                              Date:       May 15, 2009
-------------------------------------                   ------------------------
John C. Lawrence
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Reap. Dec. 8962)

Entry No. 4434.

#### John S. Connor, agent for National Wire Products Co. *v.*United States

(Decided August 15, 1957)

Plaintiff not represented by counsel.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Chief Judge:

This appeal for. reappraisement relates to certain galvanized mild steel wire exported from Germany and entered at Baltimore, Md.

The case is before me on an agreed set of facts which establishes that the proper basis for appraisement of the merchandise in question is export value, as defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, and that such statutory value thereof is the invoice unit price, less sea freight and inland freight, as invoiced, and I so hold. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
Before the Second Division,

January 14, 1941

No. 45170.

#### Protest 967924—G of Wing Chin & Co. (San Francisco).

*503Opinion by

Tilson, J.

The evidence was found not sufficient to establish that the merchandise is wearing apparel of any kind. The claim at 75 percent under paragraph 1529 (a) and T. D. 48316 was therefore overruled.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7609

LARRY HAMLET,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

CAPTAIN CASTELLAW; AL ROBERTS, Medical

Director,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, District Judge.

(CA-98-876-AM)

Submitted: February 16, 1999 Decided: March 4, 1999

Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Larry Hamlet, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Larry Hamlet appeals from the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1998) complaint for failure

to comply with a court order directing him to maintain a specific

balance in his prison account for payment of his filing fee. Finding no abuse of discretion in the district court’s dismissal, we

affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Hamlet v.

Castellaw, No. CA-98-876-AM (E.D. Va. Sept. 18; Oct. 6, 1998). We

note, however, that the remedy of a Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion

remains available to Hamlet in which he may offer proof of actual

payment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Case: 2:11-cv-00127-NMK Doc #: 11 Filed: 10/20/11 Page: 1 of 5  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00127-NMK Doc #: 11 Filed: 10/20/11 Page: 2 of 5  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00127-NMK Doc #: 11 Filed: 10/20/11 Page: 3 of 5  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00127-NMK Doc #: 11 Filed: 10/20/11 Page: 4 of 5  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:11-cv-00127-NMK Doc #: 11 Filed: 10/20/11 Page: 5 of 5  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-11T13:23:28-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
REGULATORY EVALUATION

Directorate Identifier: 2013-NM-136-AD

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific 

requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of 

transportation?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)
No. 54861.

#### Chemical Construction Corp. *v.*United States,

protest 154613-K (New York).

Opinion by

Cole, J.

The protest was dismissed.
Before the First Division,

November 9, 1945

No. 50646.

#### Protests 99398-K, etc., of Eastern Grocery Co. et al. (Los Angeles, etc.).

Opinion by

Cole, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
EXHIBIT
10.3.15.1


 


FIRST
AMENDMENT


TO EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


BETWEEN
WESTAFF SUPPORT, INC., WESTAFF (USA), INC.


AND
WESTAFF, INC. AND MICHAEL T. WILLIS


 


The
Executive Employment Agreement effective as of June 1, 2007 by and among
Westaff Support, Inc., Westaff (USA), Inc. and Westaff, Inc. (collectively
the “Company”),, and Michael T. Willis (“Executive” or “you”) is hereby amended
as follows.


 


1.             Living
Allowance and Travel Reimbursements (Section II.D.):  Effective June 1, 2008, the Company
shall extend the Executive’s Living Allowance of Six Thousand Dollars ($6,000)
for a month-to-month period not to exceed six (6) months.  Following this period, the Company shall
determine any further personal allowances or travel reimbursements in its
discretion.


 


All
other terms and conditions of the above-referenced Executive Employment
Agreement shall remain in full force and effect unless otherwise amended
herein.


 


	
   

  	
  THE
  COMPANY:

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  WESTAFF
  SUPPORT, INC.

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:

  	
       /s/
  Jamie M. Ryan

  
	
   

  	
  Name:
  Jamie M. Ryan

  
	
   

  	
  Title:
  Vice President, Legal

  
	
   

  	
  Date:

  	
     June 3,
  2008

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  WESTAFF
  (USA), INC.

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:

  	
       /s/
  Jamie M. Ryan

  
	
   

  	
  Name:
  Jamie M. Ryan

  
	
   

  	
  Title:
  Vice President, Legal

  
	
   

  	
  Date:

  	
     June 3,
  2008

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  WESTAFF,
  INC.

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:

  	
       /s/
  Jamie M. Ryan

  
	
   

  	
  Name:
  Jamie M. Ryan

  
	
   

  	
  Title:
  Vice President, Legal

  
	
   

  	
  Date:

  	
     June 3,
  2008

  
						



 


	
  AGREED:

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  EXECUTIVE

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
       /s/
  Michael T. Willis

  	
   

  
	
  Michael
  T. Willis

  	
   

  
	
  Date:
# C_2020247EN.01001201.xml

| 27.7.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 247/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.7.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 247/12

---

Judgment of the General Court of 10 June 2020 — FF&GB v EUIPO (ONE-OFF)

(Case T-707/19) (1)

(EU trade mark - Application for EU figurative mark ONE-OFF - Absolute ground for refusal - No distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

(2020/C 247/18)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: FF&GB Srl (Mantua, Italy) (represented by: M. Locatelli, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M.L. Capostagno, acting as Agent)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 12 August 2019 (Case R 239/2019-5), concerning an application for registration of the figurative sign ONE-OFF as an EU trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders FF&GB Srl to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders FF&GB Srl to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 413, 9.12.2019.

---
## ELECTRONIC RECORD 

# tHof-m

COA # 14-13-00330-CR OFFENSE: Capital Murder 

### STYLE: Jor'Dan Jacqueinn Maurice Lewis vThe State ofTexas COUNTY: Galveston COA DISPOSITION: Affirmed TRIAL COURT: 405th District Court DATE: September 16, 2014 Publish: Yes TC CASE #:11CR2636

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINALAPPEALS


### STYLE: Jor'Dan Jacqueinn Maurice Lewis vThe State ofTexas CCA# 

# APPZUMT^ Petition FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS: 

# DATE: 0x/f><//£QJS' JUDGE: fj\ Ofy^UyO^- CCADisposition: DATE: 

### JUDGE: _ SIGNED:. PUBLISH: 

# i*C7'/*

PC: DNP:

MOTION FOR FOR REHEARING IN CCA IS: 

### JUDGE: ELECTRONIC RECORD
(Reap. Dec. 9805)

#### T. M. James & Sons China Co. *v.*United States

Entry No. A331.

(Decided October 6, 1960)

*TompMns & Tompkins (Allerton deC. Tompkins*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Douh,*Assistant Attorney General *(Murray Sklaroff,*trial attorney), for the defendant.

Richardson, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement presents the question of the proper dutiable value of certain glassware exported from Italy.

The appeal has been submitted for decision upon a stipulation entered into by counsel for the parties hereto, which establishes that the proper basis of appraisement of the involved glassware is export value, as defined in section 402 (b), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, and that said value is the invoice unit values, less 10 per centum, plus packing, as invoiced.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 532 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 532

Encouraging the adults of the United States to support, listen to, and 
       encourage children so that they may reach their potential.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 14, 2006

   Ms. Collins (for herself and Mr. Isakson) submitted the following 
 resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Health, Education, 
                          Labor, and Pensions

               August 4 (legislative day, August 3), 2006

             Committee discharged; considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Encouraging the adults of the United States to support, listen to, and 
       encourage children so that they may reach their potential.

Whereas research shows that spending time together as a family is critical to 
        raising strong and resilient children;
Whereas strong, healthy families improve the quality of life and the development 
        of children;
Whereas it is essential to celebrate and reflect upon the important role that 
        all families play in the lives of children and their positive effect for 
        the future of the United States; and
Whereas the greatest natural resource of the United States is its children: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate supports the goals and ideals of National 
Children and Families Day--
            (1) to encourage adults to support, listen to, and 
        encourage children throughout the United States;
            (2) to reflect upon the important role that all families 
        play in the lives of children; and
            (3) to recognize that strong, healthy families improve the 
        quality of life and the development of children.
                                 <all>
```