alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Order filed July 27, 2012

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 10

- 00527

- CR 14

- 10

- 0052 8

- CR
ANDRES MALDONADO NAV A , Appellant
V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 232nd District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Ca use No. 1260355 , 1233224



### ORDER
This court has determined, pursuant to T ex as R ule of App ellate P rocedure 34.5(f) and 34.6(g)(2), that it must inspect the original of State's Exhibit 150, State's Exhibit 269a , Appellant's Exhibit #1 and Appellant's Exhibit #2

.
The clerk of the 232nd District Court is directed to deliver to the Clerk of this court the original of State's Exhibit 150, State's Exhibit 269a , Appellant's Exhibit #1 and Appellant's Exhibit #2, on or before August 7, 2012

. The Clerk of this court is dire cted to receive, maintain, and keep safe this original exhibit; to deliver it to the justices of this court for their inspection; and, upon completion ofinspection, to return the original of State's Exhibit 150, State's Exhibit 269a , Appellant's Exhibit #1 and Appellant's Exhibit #2, to the clerk of the 232nd District Court.

PER CURIAM
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-4026

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus CHATAN MAULTSBY, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (CR-00-50) Submitted: July 25, 2006 Decided: July 31, 2006 Before MOTZ, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Thomas P. McNamara, Federal Public Defender, Stephen C. Gordon, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Chatan Maultsby appeals from the district court’s order revoking his supervised release and sentencing him to twenty-four months of imprisonment. Maultsby’s attorney has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), representing that, in his view, there are no meritorious issues for appeal, but raising the issue of whether the district court erred in imposing Maultsby’s sentence. Although he was advised of his right to file a pro se supplemental brief, Maultsby has not done so. Finding no meritorious issues and no error by the district court, we affirm the revocation order and the sentence imposed. In light of Maultsby’s admission that he violated the terms of his supervision, we find no error by the district court in revoking his supervised release. See 18 U.S.C.A. § 3583(e)(3) (West 2000 & Supp. 2005); United States v. Davis , 53 F.3d 638, 642-43 (4th Cir. 1995). Maultsby challenges the length of the sentence and supervised release term. The twenty-four-month term of incarceration imposed by the district court was within the advisory guideline range and was reasonable. See United States v. Green , 436 F.3d 449 (4th Cir. 2006) (No. 05-4270); 18 U.S.C.A. § 3583(e)(3) (West 2000 & Supp. 2005); U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 7B1.4(a). The twenty-four month term of supervised release imposed following the revocation sentence was within the- 3 - statutory maximum and was not “plainly unreasonable.” 18 U.S.C. §§ 3583(b), (h); 3742(a)(4) (2000). In accordance with Anders , we have independently reviewed the entire recordand find no meritorious issues for appeal. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order revoking Maultsby’s supervised release and imposing a twenty-four-month sentence. This court requires that counsel inform his client, in writing, of his right to petition the Supreme Court of the United States for further review. If the client requests that a petition be filed, but counsel believes that such a petition would be frivolous, then counsel may move in this court for leave to withdraw from representation. Counsel’s motion must state that a copy thereof was served on the cli ent. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000
       
<S>                           <C>                  <C>            
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 9-MOS                9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-1998          DEC-31-1997      
<PERIOD-END>                  SEP-30-1998          SEP-30-1997<F1>
<CASH>                              6,157               12,163
<SECURITIES>                            0                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                      21,401               85,170
<ALLOWANCES>                          848                2,220
<INVENTORY>                        21,836               73,175
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                   95,375              182,297
<PP&E>                             75,159              158,617
<DEPRECIATION>                     41,879               80,915
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    312,398              329,851
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>              62,040               91,009
<BONDS>                            48,313               54,874
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>              17,413               17,375
<PREFERRED>                             0                    0
<COMMON>                                0                    0
<OTHER-SE>                        171,980              152,672
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      312,398              329,851
<SALES>                           137,691              407,549
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                  137,691              407,549
<CGS>                              86,940              281,571
<TOTAL-COSTS>                      86,940              281,571
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                   15,211               93,190
<LOSS-PROVISION>                      354                  300
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                  4,650                4,802
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    30,536               27,686
<INCOME-TAX>                       11,361               10,229
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                19,175               17,457
<DISCONTINUED>                          0                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0                    0
<CHANGES>                               0                    0
<NET-INCOME>                       19,175               17,457
<EPS-PRIMARY>                        1.21                 1.10
<EPS-DILUTED>                        1.16                 1.07
                                   
<FN>
<F1> Restated
</FN>

</TABLE>
Exhibit 35.1



AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE CORPORATION

ANNUAL COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE

PURSUANT TO SECTION 3.11(a) OF THE

SALE AND SERVICING AGREEMENT AND

ITEM 1123 OF REGULATION AB



I, Paul C. Honda, do
hereby certify that I am the Vice President and Assistant Secretary of American Honda Finance Corporation, a California corporation
(the “Company”), and further certify on behalf of the Company in its capacity as servicer (the “Servicer”
and “Sponsor”) under the Sale and Servicing Agreement (the “Agreement”) dated as of February 25, 2016 among
the Servicer and Sponsor, American Honda Receivables LLC, as Seller, and Honda Auto Receivables 2016-1 Owner Trust, as follows:



| | (i) | A review of the activities of the Servicer during the reporting period ended March 31, 2016, and
of its performance under the Agreement has been made under my supervision.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations
under the Agreement throughout such period in all material respects.
| | ---- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set
my hand this 16th day of May, 2016.



| | /s/ Paul C. Honda                                   
| | ----------------------------------------------------
| | Paul C. Honda                                       
| | Vice President and Assistant Secretary              
| | (senior officer in charge of the servicing function)
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

December 13, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver 132093 Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 132093 COA: 268119 Wayne CC: 03-011896-01 MURAD WILLIAMS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the A ugust 2, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, a nd it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishi ng entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).

K ELLY , J., would remand this case for resentencing.

d1206 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 13, 2006

Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF
FINANCIAL POSITION AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS AND RETAINED EARNINGS AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               Dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                  Jan-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                    Sep-27-1997
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         9-MOS
<CASH>                               74,478
<SECURITIES>                         33,775
<RECEIVABLES>                        67,451
<ALLOWANCES>                          3,090
<INVENTORY>                          35,306
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                    215,154
<PP&E>                              158,432
<DEPRECIATION>                       78,188
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      445,146
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                66,625
<BONDS>                               7,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                               0
<COMMON>                             16,318
<OTHER-SE>                          329,662
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>        445,146
<SALES>                             289,190
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                    289,190
<CGS>                               144,740
<TOTAL-COSTS>                        73,966
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                     (4,115)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        245
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      276
<INCOME-PRETAX>                      74,324
<INCOME-TAX>                         27,371
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                  46,953
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                         46,953
<EPS-PRIMARY>                          1.99
<EPS-DILUTED>                          1.99
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1  SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION  In connection with the
amendment to the annual report of AngioSoma Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended September 30, 2018
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Alex Blankenship, President of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  This Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on
Form 10-K/A for the year ended September 30, 2018 (the “Amendment”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in
the Amendment fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of,
and for the periods presented in, the Amendment.  Date: April 25, 2019
    BY:  /s/ Alex BlankenshipAlex BlankenshipChief Executive Officer, President, Secretary, Treasurer, Principal Executive Officer, Principal Finance and Accounting Officer and Director  A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed
form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.  The foregoing certification is not deemed “filed”
with the Securities and Exchange Commission for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
are not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language
contained in such filing.
Before the Second Division,

June 23, 1955

No. 59181.

protests 189761-K, etc. (New York).

#### Gotthold Corp. and C. A. Haynes & Co. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

' In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of steel strips of the same kind in all material respects as those the subject of Abstract 58580, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 09-7915

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

 v. 

CHALMERS LAVETTE HENDRICKS, a/k/a Champ, 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Martin K. Reidinger, 

District Judge. (3:94-cr-00030-MR-GCM-4) 

Submitted: December 15, 2009 Decided: December 22, 2009 

Before MICHAEL and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Chalmers Lavette Hendricks, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth 

Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North 

Carolina, for Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

 Chalmers Lavette Hendricks appeals a district court 

order denying his motion for a reduction of his sentence under 

18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). The district court concluded 

Hendricks was not entitled to a reduction because even with the 

benefit of Amendment 706 of the Sentencing Guidelines, his 

Guidelines range of imprisonment remained the same. We have 

reviewed the record and find no error. Accordingly, we affirm. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                            5
<MULTIPLIER>                                 1,000,000
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                              96
<SECURITIES>                                     2,806
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,603
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                           3,550
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,681
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  60,882
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           125
<OTHER-SE>                                       5,765
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    60,882
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,588
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      995
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    21
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 123
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    211
<INCOME-TAX>                                        42
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                169
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       169
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.36
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.30
        

</TABLE>
FIRST
AMENDMENT


TO
THE


REGENCY
AFFILIATES, INC.


2003
STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN




The 2003
Stock Incentive Plan (“Plan”), as adopted by the Board of Directors of Regency
Affiliates, Inc. (the “Company”) on March 17, 2003, is hereby amended by the
Board of Directors of the Company, pursuant to Section 7(a) of the Plan, as
follows:




1.           To
increase the number of shares of Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share, of the
Company available for grant under the Plan by 150,000, the first paragraph of
Section 3 of the Plan is hereby amended by deleting the number “100,000” and
substituting therefor the number “250,000.”




2.           Except
as modified herein, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect.




IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this amendment to be executed by its
duly authorized officer as of the 1st day of October, 2003.






REGENCY
      AFFILIATES, INC.By:
                /s/ Laurence
      S. LevyLaurence
      S. Levy
                  President
Testing is still underway at Felman, but the team expects to wrap up next week. That’s a week laterthan planned — the delay resulted from serious safety concerns that became apparent just one week

into the tests. With ambient temperatures in the 90s, temperatures inside the baghouse vestibules

were reaching unsafe levels (120 degrees or more). Some of the test personnel also experienceddifficulty breathing in the confined space. Felman immediately responded, and postponed the testingto secure respiration kits for the team and to reschedule testing for night hours, when temperatures are

more tolerable.

Test, Inc., the contractor performing the test, has informed us that the typical turnaround time for the

data analyses we have requested is 21 days. That means that if the testing is complete next week, asexpected, then Test, Inc. should have complete data by September 7, 2012 and be able to issue their

report shortly thereafter. We’ll let you know if there are any further delays, but, at this point, I think

you can expect to see the full test report in mid-September.

From: Conrad Chin [mailto:Chin.Conrad©epamail.epa.gov]

Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2012 7:29 AM

To: Amy M. Lincoln; John Rego

Cc: Chuck French; Darcie Smith; Beth Friedman; Jeff.McKinney@erametgroup.com; Jonathan Averback;

jskonrady@fpiwv.com; Laura K. McAfee; nelson.brad@ecrweb.com; Richard Lunn;

thillier@policynavigation.com; Robertson, James; Christina Wieg; Deshaies, Marco

Subject: July tests at Eramet and Felman

Good morningWe would like to have some idea when the test results will be available to EPA? Obviously from our point

of view, the earlier the better.

Thanks.

Conrad K. Chin

Mail Code D243-02Metals and Minerals Group

Sector Policies and Programs DivisionOffice of Air Quality Planning and Standards

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

919-541-1512 (voice)919-541-3207 (fax)
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 06634**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket** **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  x 

### 06634\06634_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook



### 06634\06634_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist 

### 06634\06634_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted x 

### 06634\06634_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 06634\06634_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 06634\06634_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 06634\06634_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 06634\06634_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file



### 06634\Certification Statement Plant ID 06634.pdf Plant certification statement x 

### 06634\Supporting Documents\06634_Hammond Diagram C2-31-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### 06634\Supporting Documents\06634_Hammond Diagram C2-31-2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### 06634\Supporting Documents\06634_Hammond Diagram C2-31-4E.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### 06634\Supporting Documents\06634_Hammond Diagram C2-31-4W.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey



### 06634\Supporting Documents\06634_Hammond Diagram C2-31-5.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### 06634\Supporting Documents\06634_Hammond Diagram D-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### x 06634\Supporting Documents\06634_Hammond Diagram D-3.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### x 06634\Supporting Documents\06634_Hammond Diagram D-4.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### 06634\Supporting Documents\06634_Hammond Diagram D-5.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### 06634\Supporting Documents\06634_Hammond Diagram D-7.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### 06634\Supporting Documents\06634_Hammond Diagram WB-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey



### 06634\Supporting Documents\06634_Hammond Map-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### 06634\Supporting Documents\06634_Hammond Map-2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### 06634\Supporting Documents\06634_Hammond Map-3.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### 06634\Supporting Documents\06634_Transmittal letter - Georgia Power.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### x 06634\Supporting Documents\Hammond Diagram C2-31-3.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### x 06634\Supporting Documents\Hammond Diagram D-2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### x 06634\Supporting Documents\Hammond Diagram D-6.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in theSteam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.