alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 515 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 515

Expressing the sense of the Senate on the continued presence of United 
               States troops in Iraq until at least 2009.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 19, 2006

Mr. Wyden submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Expressing the sense of the Senate on the continued presence of United 
               States troops in Iraq until at least 2009.

    Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that--
            (1) the members of the Armed Forces deserve the enormous 
        respect and support of the Senate and the American people for 
        the sacrifices that they are making on behalf of our country; 
        and
            (2) the President's intention, as stated on March 21, 2006, 
        that ``future Presidents'' will determine whether to keep 
        members of the Armed Forces in Iraq undermines the preparedness 
        of the United States military to respond to other crises and 
        should not be supported.
                                 <all>
```
USGS HomeContact USGSSearch USGS

SIM 2988 

**U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY    Scientific Investigations Map 2988**

# Net-Infiltration Map of the Navajo Sandstone Outcrop Area in Western Washington County, Utah

#### **Prepared in cooperation with the**
Before the Third Division,

June 6, 1946

No. 51186.

#### Protest 117852-K of Benjamin Adler (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

From the evidence presented and an examination of the exhibits it was held that the merchandise in bales Nos. 35, 50, 61, 62, and 96 is cotton having a staple of less than one and one-eighth inches in length, and that it is entitled to free entry .under paragraph 1662 as claimed.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markm an Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk September 4, 2012

h0827 

# Order

September 4, 2012

145112

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 145112

COA: 308489

Monroe CC: 10

- 038667

- FH

SCOTT L. BORKOWSKI,

Defendant

- Appellant.

____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 22, 2012 order

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded

that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 21/2005

of 6 January 2005         

fixing the maximum export refund on barley in connection with the invitation to tender issued in Regulation (EC) No 1757/2004

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For tenders notified on 31 December 2004 to 6 January 2005, pursuant to the invitation to tender issued in Regulation (EC) No 1757/2004, the maximum refund on exportation of barley shall be 17,99 EUR/t.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 7 January 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 6 January 2005.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78.

(2)OJ L 313, 12.10.2004, p. 10.

(3)OJ L 147, 30.6.1995, p. 7. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 777/2004 (OJ L 123, 27.4.2004, p. 50).

----
III 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 52 

Honoring Shirley Chisholm for her service to the Nation and expressing 

condolences to her family, friends, and supporters on her death. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 14, 2005 

Mrs. CLINTON (for herself and Mr. LEVIN) submitted the following resolution; 

which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Honoring Shirley Chisholm for her service to the Nation 

and expressing condolences to her family, friends, and 

supporters on her death. 

Whereas Shirley Chisholm was born Shirley Anita St. Hill on 

November 30, 1924, in Brooklyn, New York, to Charles 

and Ruby St. Hill, immigrants from British Guyana and 

Barbados; 

Whereas in 1949, Shirley Chisholm was a founding member 

of the Bedford-Stuyvesant Political League; 

Whereas in 1960, she established the Unity Democratic Club, 

which was instrumental in mobilizing black and Hispanic 

voters; 

Whereas in 1964, Chisholm ran for a New York State Assembly seat and won; 
2 

SRES 52 ATS 

Whereas in 1968, Chisholm became the first African-American woman elected to Congress, representing New York’s 

Twelfth Congressional District; 

Whereas as a member of Congress, Chisholm was an advocate 

for civil rights, women’s rights, and the poor; 

Whereas in 1969, Shirley Chisholm, along with other AfricanAmerican members of Congress, founded the Congressional Black Caucus; 

Whereas on January 25, 1972, Chisholm announced her candidacy for President and became the first African-American to be considered for the presidential nomination by 

a major national political party; 

Whereas although Chisholm did not win the nomination at 

the 1972 Democratic National Convention in Miami, she 

received the votes of 151 delegates; 

Whereas Shirley Chisholm served 7 terms in the House of 

Representatives before retiring from politics in 1982; 

Whereas Shirley Chisholm was a dedicated member of Delta 

Sigma Theta Sorority and received the sorority’s highest 

award, the Mary Church Terrell Award, in 1977 for her 

political activism and contributions to the Civil Rights 

Movement; 

Whereas Shirley Chisholm was a model public servant and an 

example for African-American women, and her strength 

and perseverance serve as an inspiration for all people 

striving for change; and 

Whereas on January 1, 2005, Shirley Chisholm died at the 

age of 80: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the Senate— 
3 

SRES 52 ATS 

(1) honors Shirley Chisholm for her service to the 

Nation, her work to improve the lives of women and minorities, her steadfast commitment to demonstrating the 

power of compassion, and her dedication to justice and 

equality; and 

(2) expresses its deepest condolences to her family, 

friends, and supporters. 

Æ
Order entered June 3, 2022

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-22-00011-CV

SNIDER PLAZA ALLIANCE, Appellant

V.

THE CITY OF UNIVERSITY PARK, PATRICK BAUGH, IN HIS 

OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY 

DEVELOPMENT, AND JAMES E. STRODE, Appellees

On Appeal from the 160th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-21-14812

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s June 1, 2022 unopposed motion for extension 

of time to file its brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER the brief be filed no 

later than July 11, 2022. Because the brief was first due April 29, 2022, we 

caution that further extension requests will be disfavored.

/s/ KEN MOLBERG

JUSTICE
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6131
JAMES STATON, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JUANITA H. BAKER; ELBERT T. BUCK, JR.; WILLIAM A. LOWERY; CHARLES L. MANN; MARGARET M. STAMEY, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Chief District Judge. (CA-96-745-5-F) Submitted: May 15, 1997 Decided: May 29, 1997 Before RUSSELL, HALL, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James Staton, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant, a North Carolina inmate, appeals the districtcourt's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (West Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Staton v. Baker , No. CA-96-745-5-F (E.D.N.C. Dec. 12, 1996). We dispense with oral argument becausethe facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

         <S>  <C>

<ARTICLE>  5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION 
EXTRACTED FROM THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF TOROTEL, INC. AND 
SUBSIDIARIES CONTAINED IN ITS QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-
QSB FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JANUARY 31, 1999, AND IS 
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL 
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            APR-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                 JAN-31-1999
<CASH>                                       311,000
<SECURITIES>                                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                                664,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 83,000
<INVENTORY>                                  2,898,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,877,000
<PP&E>                                       4,199,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,811,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,286,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,862,000
<BONDS>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        0
<PREFERRED>                                  0
<COMMON>                                     1,441,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,383,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,286,000
<SALES>                                      6,165,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,165,000
<CGS>                                        5,556,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                7,897,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (984,000)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            246,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (994,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (994,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              0
<CHANGES>                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (994,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                (.35)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                (.35)
        

</TABLE>
III 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 593 

Supporting the goals and ideals of National Children and Families Day 

to encourage the adults of the United States to support and listen 

to children and to help children throughout the United States achieve 

their hopes and dreams. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 29, 2006 

Mr. ALLEN (for himself and Mr. WARNER) submitted the following resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and 

Pensions 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting the goals and ideals of National Children and 

Families Day to encourage the adults of the United 

States to support and listen to children and to help 

children throughout the United States achieve their 

hopes and dreams. 

Whereas the citizens of the United States celebrate National 

Children and Families Day on the fourth Saturday of 

June; 

Whereas research has shown that spending time together as 

a family is critical to raising strong and resilient children; 

Whereas strong and healthy families assist in the development of children; 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 593 IS 

Whereas strong and healthy families improve the quality of 

life of children; 

Whereas it is essential for the adults of the United States to 

celebrate and reflect upon— 

(1) the important role that all families play in the 

lives of children; and 

(2) the positive effect that strong and healthy children will have on the future of the United States; and 

Whereas the greatest natural resource of the United States 

is the children of the Nation: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) supports the goals and ideals of National 

3 Children and Families Day; and 

4 (2) encourages the adults of the United 

5 States— 

6 (A) to support, listen to, and encourage 

7 children throughout the United States; 

8 (B) to reflect upon the important role that 

9 all families play in the lives of children; and 

10 (C) to recognize that strong and healthy 

11 families— 

12 (i) assist in the development of chil13 dren; and 

14 (ii) improve the quality of life of chil15 dren. 

Æ 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
Hogan Lovells US LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in the District of Columbia. “Hogan Lovells” is an international legal practice that includes Hogan Lovells US LLP and Hogan Lovells International LLP, with offices in: Abu Dhabi Alicante Amsterdam Baltimore Beijing Berlin Brussels Caracas Colorado Springs Denver Dubai Dusseldorf Frankfurt Hamburg Hanoi Ho Chi Minh City Hong Kong Houston London Los Angeles Madrid Miami Milan Moscow Munich New York Northern Virginia Paris Philadelphia Prague Rome San Francisco Shanghai Silicon Valley Singapore Tokyo Ulaanbaatar Warsaw Washington DC Associated offices: Budapest Jeddah Riyadh Zagreb. For more information see www.hoganlovells.com \\DC - 036787/000001 - 3443606 v1 Hogan Lovells US LLP Columbia Square 555 Thirteenth Street, NW Washington, DC 20004 T +1 202 637 5600 F +1 202 637 5910 www.hoganlovells.com

July 6, 2012
By Electronic Mail Ms. Esta Rosenberg Chief, U.S. Air Carrier Licensing Division Office of International Aviation U.S. Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590
Re: Request of Frontier Airlines, Inc. for Conversio n of Authorized Service

(DEN-ZIH), Dockets DOT-OST-2011-0076 and 2005-22228 Dear Ms. Rosenberg: On behalf of Frontier Airlines, Inc., we have polled the U.S. carrier representatives served with the above-referenced Request filed on June 28, 2012, and no carrier has objected to the relief sought therein. Sincerely,

Patrick R. Rizzi Counsel patrick.rizzi@hoganlovells.com D +1 202 637 5659 Counsel for Frontier Airlines, Inc.

cc: 

### bob.kneisley@wnco.com; marshall.sinick@squiresanders.com; carl.nelson@aa.com;

robert.wirick@aa.com; francis.heil@aa.com; james.kaleigh@aa.com; sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com; sametta.c.barnett@delta.com; jhill@dowlohnes.com; jyoung@yklaw.com; dkirstein@yklaw.com; john.fredericksen@suncountry.com; dan.weiss@united.com; howard_kass@usairways.com; barbara.russell@virginamerica.com; brian.hedberg@dot.gov; esta.rosenberg@dot.gov; brett.kruger@dot.gov
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 

          - [Project No. 77-163] 

In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's regulations, the Office of Energy Projects has reviewed various proposals regarding restoration of water used for frost protection to Lake Pillsbury, part of the Potter Valley Project. The Potter Valley Project is located on the Eel River and East Branch Russian River (EBRR), in northern California. An environmental assessment (EA) has been prepared. 

                    In the EA, the Commission's staff concludes that restoration of water to Lake Pillsbury, used by the Potter Valley Irrigation District from March 15 through April 14, 2007 for frost protection, would not constitute a major                           ( print page 20527)                        federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment.                 

                    A copy of the EA is attached to a Commission order titled “Order on Restoration of Water to Lake Pillsbury,” issued April 18, 2007, and is available at the Commission's Public Reference Room. A copy of the EA may also be viewed on the Commission's Web site at                     *http://www.ferc.gov*                     using the “elibrary” link. Enter the docket number (P-77) in the docket field to access the document. For assistance, call (202) 502-8222 or (202) 502-8659 (for TTY).                 

Kimberly D. Bose, 

Secretary.

[FR Doc. E7-7804 Filed 4-24-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
# C_2017249EN.01000701.xml

| 31.7.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 249/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.7.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 249/7

---

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 8 June 2017 — Schniga GmbH v Community Plant Variety Office (CPVO), Brookfield New Zealand Ltd, Elaris SNC

(Case C-625/15 P) (1)

((Appeal - Community plant variety rights - Application for a Community plant variety right - Apple variety ‘Gala Schnitzer’ - Technical examination - Test guidelines issued by the Administrative Council of the Community Plant Variety Office (CPVO) - Regulation (EC) No 1239/95 - Article 23(1) - Powers of the President of the CPVO - Addition of a distinctive characteristic on completion of the technical examination - Stability of the characteristic during two growing cycles))

(2017/C 249/09)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: Schniga GmbH (represented by: R. Kunze and G. Würtenberger, Rechtsanwälte)

Other parties to the proceedings: Community Plant Variety Office (CPVO) (represented by: M. Ekvad and F. Mattina, acting as Agents), Brookfield New Zealand Ltd, Elaris SNC (represented by: M. Eller, avvocato)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Sets aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 10 September 2015, Schniga v CPVO — Brookfield New Zealand and Elaris (Gala Schnitzer) (T-91/14 and T-92/14, not published, EU:T:2015:624); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Sets aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 10 September 2015, Schniga v CPVO — Brookfield New Zealand and Elaris (Gala Schnitzer) (T-91/14 and T-92/14, not published, EU:T:2015:624);

| 2. | Annuls the decisions of the Board of Appeal of the Community Plant Variety Office (CPVO) of 20 September 2013 relating to the grant of a Community plant variety right for the Gala Schnitzer apple variety (Cases A 003/2007 and A 004/2007); |
| --- | --- |

2.

Annuls the decisions of the Board of Appeal of the Community Plant Variety Office (CPVO) of 20 September 2013 relating to the grant of a Community plant variety right for the Gala Schnitzer apple variety (Cases A 003/2007 and A 004/2007);

| 3. | Orders the Community Plant Variety Office to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Schniga GmbH; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Community Plant Variety Office to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Schniga GmbH;

| 4. | Orders Brookfield New Zealand Ltd and Elaris SNC to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders Brookfield New Zealand Ltd and Elaris SNC to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  
  OJ C 27, 25.1.2016.

---
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-6318
ANTHONY M. BROWN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus BLUE RIDGE REGIONAL JAIL AUTHORITY-HCADF; T. E. FEARS, Officer, Defendants - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District Judge. (CA-01-10-7) Submitted: May 17, 2001 Decided: May 29, 2001 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Anthony M. Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Anthony M. Brown appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Brown v. Blue Ridge Reg’l Jail , No. CA-01- 10-7 (W.D. Va. Jan. 31, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
----

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3862 — Bilfinger Berger/WIB/JVC)

(2005/C 188/05)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 26 July 2005, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in German and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

----
# C_2017392EN.01000701.xml

| 20.11.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 392/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.11.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 392/7

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 21 September 2017 — European Commission v Federal Republic of Germany

(Case C-616/15) (1)

1

((Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Taxation - Value added tax - Directive 2006/112/EC - Article 132(1)(f) - Exemption for services supplied to their members by independent groups of persons - Restriction to independent groups whose members exercise a limited number of professions))

(2017/C 392/09)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: M. Owsiany-Hornung and by B.-R. Killmann and R. Lyal, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Federal Republic of Germany (represented by: T. Henze and J. Möller and by K. Petersen, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that by restricting the VAT exemption to IGPs whose members exercise a limited number of professions, the Federal Republic of Germany has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 132(1)(f) of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that by restricting the VAT exemption to IGPs whose members exercise a limited number of professions, the Federal Republic of Germany has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 132(1)(f) of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax;

| 2. | Orders the Federal Republic of Germany to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Federal Republic of Germany to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 98, 14.3.2016.

1

---