alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
imci_ex102.htm

EXHIBIT 10.2
  
 MODIFICATION AGREEMENT #4 TO
  PROMISSORY NOTE
  
 This MODIFICATION AGREEMENT is made as of March 31, 2022 between Infinite Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation with offices at 175 Sully’s Trail Suite 202, Pittsford, NY 14534 (“Borrower”) and Donald W. Reeve, an individual residing at 7 Cross Meadow Lane, Pittsford, NY 14534 (“Lender”).
  
 WHEREAS, the Borrower has issued to Lender a note in the principal amount of $100,000 dated May 25, 2021, which note has a principal balance of $100,000 and accrued interest of $5,095.89 at 3/31/2022 (the “Reeve Note”) ; and 
  
 WHEREAS, the parties desire to modify the terms and conditions of the Reeve Note as follows:
  
 NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:
  
 	  
	 1)
	 The Note is modified to provide that the time at which the entire principal balance and accrued and unpaid interest shall be due and payable is June 1, 2022. 

	  
	  
	  

	  
	 2)
	 Except as modified by this Agreement, all of the terms, covenants and conditions of the Notes shall remain the same.


  In witness whereof, Borrower and Lender have executed this Agreement under the day and year first written above.
  
 INFINITE GROUP, INC.
  
 /s/ James A Villa                                                            
 By: James A. Villa, CEO
 Date: 3/31/2022
  
 Donald W. Reeve
  
 /s/ Donald W. Reeve                                                     
 By: Donald W. Reeve
 Date: 3/31/2022
III 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 43 

Designating the first day of April 2005 as ‘‘National Asbestos Awareness 

Day’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 8, 2005 

Mr. REID submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Designating the first day of April 2005 as ‘‘National 

Asbestos Awareness Day’’. 

Whereas deadly asbestos fibers are invisible and cannot be 

smelled or tasted; 

Whereas when airborne fibers are inhaled or swallowed, the 

damage is permanent and irreversible; 

Whereas these fibers can cause mesothelioma, asbestosis, 

lung cancer, and pleural diseases; 

Whereas asbestos-related diseases can take 10 to 50 years to 

present themselves; 

Whereas the expected survival rate of those diagnosed with 

mesothelioma is between 6 and 24 months; 

Whereas little is known about late stage treatment and there 

is no cure for asbestos-related diseases; 
2 

•SRES 43 IS

Whereas early detection of asbestos-related diseases would 

give patients increased treatment options and often improve their prognosis; 

Whereas asbestos is a toxic and dangerous substance and 

must be disposed of properly; 

Whereas nearly half of the more than 1,000 screened firefighters, police officers, rescue workers, and volunteers 

who responded to the World Trade Center attacks on 

September 11, 2001, have new and persistent respiratory 

problems; 

Whereas the industry groups with the highest incidence rates 

of asbestos-related diseases, based on 2000 to 2002 figures, were shipyard workers, vehicle body builders (including rail vehicles), pipefitters, carpenters and electricians, construction (including insulation work and 

stripping), extraction, energy and water supply, and manufacturing; 

Whereas the United States imports more than 30,000,000 

pounds of asbestos used in products throughout the Nation; 

Whereas asbestos-related diseases kill 10,000 people in the 

United States each year, and the numbers are increasing; 

Whereas asbestos exposure is responsible for 1 in every 125 

deaths of men over the age of 50; 

Whereas safety and prevention will reduce asbestos exposure 

and asbestos-related diseases; 

Whereas asbestos has been the largest single cause of occupational cancer; 

Whereas asbestos is still a hazard for 1,300,000 workers in 

the United States; 
3 

•SRES 43 IS

Whereas asbestos-related deaths have greatly increased in the 

last 20 years and are expected to continue to increase; 

Whereas 30 percent of all asbestos-related disease victims 

were exposed to asbestos on naval ships and in shipyards; 

Whereas asbestos was used in the construction of virtually all 

office buildings, public schools, and homes built before 

1975; and 

Whereas the establishment of a ‘‘National Asbestos Awareness Day’’ would raise public awareness about the prevalence of asbestos-related diseases and the dangers of asbestos exposure: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate designates the first day of 

2 April 2005 as ‘‘National Asbestos Awareness Day’’. 

Æ
# C_2016145EN.01001301.xml

| 25.4.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 145/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.4.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 145/13

---

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 15 February 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State — Netherlands) — J. N. v Staatssecretaris voor Veiligheid en Justitie

(Case C-601/15 PPU) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Urgent preliminary ruling procedure - Standards for the reception of applicants for international protection - Directive 2008/115/EC - Lawful residence - Directive 2013/32/EU - Article 9 - Right to remain in a Member State - Directive 2013/33/EU - Point (e) of the first subparagraph of Article 8(3) - Detention - Protection of national security or public order - Validity - Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Articles 6 and 52 - Limitation - Proportionality))

(2016/C 145/15)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Referring court

Raad van State

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: J. N.

Appellant:

Respondent: Staatssecretaris voor Veiligheid en Justitie

Respondent:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Consideration of point (e) of the first subparagraph of Article 8(3) of Directive 2013/33/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 laying down standards for the reception of applicants for international protection has disclosed no factor of such a kind as to affect the validity of that provision in the light of Articles 6 and 52(1) and (3) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.

---

(1)  OJ C 38, 1.2.2016.

1

---
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                             TRANS-INDUSTRIES, INC.

                        CERTIFICATION OF CFO PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Trans-Industries, Inc.
(the "Company") for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Kai Kosanke, as Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes - Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(b) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Kai Kosanke
--------------------
Name: Kai Kosanke
Title: Vice President, and Chief Financial Officer
Date: May 16, 2005

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Paragraph 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
# Official Journal C 194A/31 J

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 194A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5131 July 2008 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 194A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5131 July 2008

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | Europol |
| 2008/C 194A/01 | Notice of recruitment: Director | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

Europol

2008/C 194A/01

Notice of recruitment: Director

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 20 2 3

- 0 257

_____________________________
K ENNETH B URNS , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the C ircuit Court for Taylor County

. Gregory S. Parker , Judge

. May 15, 2024

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
B.L. T HOMAS , B ILBREY , and W INOKUR , JJ., concur

.2 _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________

Michael Ufferman of Michael Ufferman Law Firm, P.A., Tallahassee
, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Daren L. Shippy , Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-2060

DAVID LOUIS WHITEHEAD, Plaintiff – Appellant,

v. STRAYER UNIVERSITY; SOUTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY; HYATT HOTEL INC.; UNNAMED AKA INC. AND JANE DOE AND 1-25 DOES, Defendants – Appellees.

No. 09-1154

DAVID LOUIS WHITEHEAD, Plaintiff – Appellant,

v. STRAYER UNIVERSITY; SOUTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY; HYATT HOTEL INC.; UNNAMED AKA INC. AND JANE DOE AND 1-25 DOES, Defendants – Appellees.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:08-cv-00832-LMB-TCB)

Submitted: August 26, 2009 Decided: September 2, 2009

Before MICHAEL, KING, and GREGORY Circuit Judges.Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David Louis Whitehead, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

23 PER CURIAM: David Whitehead appeals the district court’s August 29, 2008, September 8, 2008 and September 11, 2008 orders. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Whitehead’s motion for appointment of counsel; deny Whitehead’s en banc request/motion to seize all products based on Whitehead’s intellectual properties; deny Whitehead’s motion for injunction relief to move Wall Street to Richmond, Virginia; deny Whitehead’s July 2, 2009 motion to consolidate his eight pending appeals and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Whitehead v. Strayer Univ. No. 1:08-cv-00832-MB-TCB (E.D. Va. filed Aug. 29, 2008 & entered Sept. 2, 2008; filed Sept. 8, 2009 & entered Sept. 9, 2008; filed & entered Sept. 11, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
F. 10INCOURTOF/ 1?thCourtofAppeal / 1 II /\'i \\ '' 'I'jH 

### 1 If /1/ / /I 

### CATHYS. LUSK,/Dtp '/• \

OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711

N*i£ FILE COPY

7/29/2015 COA No. 12-14-00206-CR 

### LUSK, CHARLES EDWARD Tr. Ct. No. 241-0126-14 PD-0688-15 

## On this day, the Appellant's Pro Se petition for discretionary review has been refused. 

### Abel Acosta, Clerk 12TH COURT OF APPEALS CLERK CATHY LUSK 

### 1517 W. FRONT, ROOM 354 TYLER, TX 75701 * DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *
No. 56143.

protest 731919-G (San Francisco).

#### McDonald & Linforth *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

The protest was dismissed.
# C_2017070EN.01000602.xml

| 6.3.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 70/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.3.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 70/6

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 18 January 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Vestre Landsret — Denmark) — Sjelle Autogenbrug I/S v Skatteministeriet

(Case C-471/15) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Taxation - Value added tax - Directive 2006/112/EC - Special scheme for taxing the profit margin - Concept of ‘second-hand goods’ - Sales of parts removed from end-of-life vehicles))

(2017/C 070/09)

Language of the case: Danish

Referring court

Referring court

Vestre Landsret

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Sjelle Autogenbrug I/S

Applicant:

Defendant: Skatteministeriet

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 311(1)(1) of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax must be interpreted as meaning that used parts, from end-of-life motor vehicles purchased by a vehicle reuse undertaking from a private individual, intended to be sold as spare parts, constitute ‘second-hand goods’ within the meaning of that provision, with the result that the supplies of such parts, effected by a taxable dealer, are subject to the application of the profit margin scheme.

---

(1)  OJ C 363, 3.11.2015.

1

---
No. 44210.

#### Protest 11572-K of G. Marinos & Sons (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

No evidence was offered in support of the claims made. On the record presented the protest was overruled.
Napoleon Gas Fireplaces: BGD33 

IDEALERS I SITE MAP 

Fireplaces Stoves Inserts Mantels Outdoor 

BGD33 Direct Vent Fireplace 

Specifications BGD33 

Fuel 

(Propane Conversion Kit Available) Natural Gas 

BTU Input 

Maximum Heating Efficiency 

(Steady State) 

Blower 

Mobile Home Approved 

Additional Information 

• 4" & 7" Rear Venting 

16,400 

71% 

Optional 

Yes 

• Overall depth of 12" makes endless installation 

possibilities with a minimum of space 

• No hearth extension required, saving you space in 

smaller rooms 

• No chimney required - vents through the wall or roof 

• Vents up to 40 ft vertically or 8 ft horizontally 

• Ground level and above installations 

• Basement even below grade using a Periscope 

(#GD201) 

• Approved for installation in bathrooms, bedrooms and 

bed sitting rooms 

• Suitable for mobile home installations 

• Hot air distribution kit optional 

TESTED TO ANSI Z21.SS and CSA 2.33 

Page 1 of 1 

Tech Services What's New Company Where to Buy 

Features Accessories 

Line dimensions are to be used as a guide only. Please consult your 

installation manual for updated and precise measurements before proceeding 

to install or frame your Napoleon Fireplace. Check all Local and National 

Building Codes and Gas Regulations 

Manual Brochure 

I Fireplaces I Stoves I Inserts I Mantels I Outdoor I Tech Services I What's New I Company I Where to Buy 

Napoleon Gourmet Grills Napoleon Heating and Air Napoleon Waterfalls 

Copyright© 2008 Napoleon® Fireplaces. All rights reserved. 

EERE-2006-BT-STD-0129 COMMENT 123
Napoleon Gas Fireplaces: BGD33 

IDEALERS I SITE MAP 

Fireplaces Stoves Inserts Mantels Outdoor 

BGD33 Direct Vent Fireplace 

• 81% steady state maximum efficiency and up to 16,400 

BTU's 

• Tested as a heater 

• No electricity required to light or operate - millivolt 

system ensures reliable use even during power failures 

• Turn on and off at the flick of a switch 

• Heat transferring high temperature glass (16"x30 5/8") 

• Available in clean burning, convenient natural gas or 

propane 

• 50% flame/heat adjustment for maximum comfort and 

efficiency 

• No conventional chimney required - vents directly 

through the wall 

• Equipped with 100% SAFE GUARDTM safety gas control 

system quickly and automatically shuts fof the gas 

supply for your peace of mind 

• Realistic, ceramic fiber, light-weight molded PHAZER® 

logs for a natural wood burning look 

• Zero clearance installations let you frame with standard 

2x4's 

• YELLOW DANCING FLAME® burner system 

• President's Limited Lifetime Warranty 

Page I of 1 

Tech Services What's New Company Where • to Buy 

Specifications 

I Fireplaces I Stoves I Inserts I Mantels I Outdoor I Tech Services I What's New I Company I Where to Buy 

Napoleon Gourmet Grills Napoleon Heating and Air Napoleon Waterfalls 

Copyright© 2008 Napoleon® Fireplaces. All rights reserved. 

EERE-2006-BT-STD-0129 COMMENT 123
III 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 163 

Designating June 5 through June 11, 2005, as ‘‘National Hispanic Media 

Week’’, in honor of the Hispanic Media of America. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 8, 2005 

Mr. DOMENICI (for himself, Mr. SALAZAR, Mr. MARTINEZ, and Mr. BINGAMAN) submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 

agreed to 

RESOLUTION

Designating June 5 through June 11, 2005, as ‘‘National 

Hispanic Media Week’’, in honor of the Hispanic Media 

of America.

Whereas for almost 470 years the United States has benefitted from the work of Hispanic writers and publishers; 

Whereas over 600 Hispanic publications circulate over 

20,000,000 copies every week in the United States; 

Whereas 1 in 8 Americans is served by a Hispanic publication; 

Whereas the Hispanic press informs many Americans about 

great political, economic, and social issues of our day; 
2

•SRES 163 ATS

Whereas the Hispanic press in the United States focuses in 

particular on informing and promoting the well being of 

our country’s Hispanic community; and 

Whereas commemorating the achievements of the Hispanic 

press acknowledges the important role the Hispanic press 

has played in United States history: Now, therefore, be 

it

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates June 5 through June 11, 2005, 

3 as ‘‘National Hispanic Media Week’’, in honor of the 

4 Hispanic Media of America; and 

5 (2) encourages the people of the United States 

6 to observe the week with appropriate programs and 

7 activities.

Æ
#### UNITED STATES, Appellant v CHARLES A. CRAWFORD, Recruit, U. S. Army, Appellee

10 USCMA 464, 28 CMR 30

No. 12,929

Decided June 12, 1959

*Lieutenant Colonel James G. McConaughy*and *First Lieutenant Wade H. Sides, Jr.,*were on the brief for Appellant, United States.

*Colonel James Garnett, Captain Arnold I. Melniclc,*and *First Lieutenant Thomas J. Simmons*were on the brief for Appellee, Accused.

Opinion of the Court

Homer Ferguson, Judge:

The accused was convicted by a general court-martial of absence without leave, in violation of Article 86, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 886, and was sentenced to a bad-conduct discharge and total forfeitures. The convening authority reduced the forfeitures to $50.00 per month for six months, suspended the discharge until completion of appellate review, and ordered execution of the forfeiture portion of the sentence. The board of review, describing the suspension as one of indefinite duration, purported to reduce the period thereof by fixing Au*465gust 17, 1959, as the date on which the same would be remitted unless sooner vacated. With this modification it affirmed and approved the sentence.

The Judge Advocate General of the Army, acting pursuant to Article 67 (b) (2) of the Code, supra, 10 USC § 867, has requested our action with respect to the following issue:

> Was the board of review correct in holding that, in the absence of confinement, the convening authority could not suspend the execution of the punitive discharge without providing for its automatic remission?

In essence, this is the same question as that presented by United States v May, 10 USCMA 358, 27 CMR 432. There we held:

> “. . . Once a convening authority so empowered, undertakes to suspend any portion of a sentence, such suspension — without reference to the language employed or omitted — constitutes the accused a probationer whose status may be changed only after a full hearing.”

Whether or not the approved sentence includes confinement is of no importance. United States v Cecil, 10 USCMA 371, 27 CMR 445.

These authorities effectively dispose of the issue certified.

They do not completely dispose of the cases however, for, by its terms, the suspension in this case was for the period of appellate review only. That period will expire prior to August 17, 1959. Since subsequent authorities cannot extend the period of suspension, this portion of the board’s action is illegal. United States v Butts, 7 USCMA 472, 22 CMR 262.

As thus modified, the decision of the board of review is affirmed.

Chief Judge Quinn concurs.

Latimer, Judge

(dissenting):

I dissent.

For the reasons set forth in my dissenting opinion in United States v May, 10 USCMA 358, 27 CMR 432, I believe the board of review’s holding in the instant case to be erroneous. Accordingly, I would answer the certified issue in the negative and I would reverse the decision of the board.
(Reap. Dec. 9368)

#### W. R. Zanes & Company *v.*United States

Entry No. 4648-H.

(Decided March 30, 1959)

*Siegel, Mandell & Damdson*for the plaintiff.

*George Ooohram Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Chief Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement relates to certain electric motors exported from Antwerp, Belgium, and entered at the port of Houston, Tex.

*584Stipulated facts, upon which, the case has been submitted, establish that the proper basis for appraisement of the merchandise in question is cost of production, as defined in section 402(f) of the Tariff Act of 1930, and that such statutory value thereof is the “invoice unit values less 16%% less 9%!% plus 0.60% packed,” and I so hold. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: Performancetrack annual progress report [electronic resource].**
 
1st | 2nd | 3rd | 4th| 5th | 6th
 
SuDoc Number:EP 1.335:
Item Number:0431-J-50 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000612017
 
June 13, 2018
Searched for **http://www.nwcouncil.org/fw/isab/isab99-7/**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **http://www.nwcouncil.org/fw/isab/isab99-7/**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.