alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Arnold Simon, certify that,

(1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10Q of Aris Industries, Inc.;

(2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

(3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

(4) The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

(b) (Intentionally omitted)

(c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

<PAGE>

(5) The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent function):

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize, and report financial information; and

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the Company's internal controls over
financial reporting;

Date:  August 16, 2004

/s/ Arnold Simon
    Chief Executive Officer
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 32 (Tuesday, February 18, 2014)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 9133-9134]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-03439]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R06-OAR-2010-1055; FRL-9906-64-Region 6]

Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; 
New Mexico; Transportation Conformity and General Conformity 
Requirements for Bernalillo County

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to 
approve revisions to the New Mexico State Implementation Plan (SIP) at 
New Mexico Administrative Code 20.11.3 and 20.11.4, concerning 
transportation conformity and general conformity rules for Bernalillo 
County, New Mexico. The plan revision is intended to ensure consistency 
with amendments to the federal Transportation Conformity Rule and the 
federal General Conformity Rule. These plan revisions meet statutory 
and regulatory requirements, and are consistent with EPA's guidance.

DATES: Written comments should be received on or before March 20, 2014.

ADDRESSES: Please see the related direct final rule, which is located 
in the ``Rules and Regulations'' section of this Federal Register, for 
detailed instructions on how to submit comments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michelle Peace, Facility Assessment 
Section (6PD-A), Environmental

[[Page 9134]]

Protection Agency, Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 700, Dallas, Texas 
75202-2733, telephone 214-665-7430; fax number 214-665-7263; email 
address peace.michelle@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Why is EPA issuing this proposed rule?

    This document proposes to take action on SIP revisions submitted by 
the Governor of New Mexico on behalf of the Albuquerque Bernalillo 
County Air Quality, Environmental Health Department on November 18, 
2010, May 24, 2011, and October 11, 2012. We have published a direct 
final rule approving the State's SIP revisions in the ``Rules and 
Regulations'' section of this Federal Register because we view this as 
a noncontroversial action and anticipate no adverse comment. We have 
explained our reasons for this action in the preamble to the direct 
final rule.
    If we receive no adverse comment, we will not take further action 
on this proposed rule. If we receive adverse comment, we will withdraw 
the direct final rule and it will not take effect. We would address all 
public comments in any subsequent final rule based upon this proposed 
rule.
    We do not intend to institute a second comment period on this 
action. Any parties interested in commenting must do so at this time. 
For further information, please see the information provided in the 
ADDRESSES section of this document.

    Dated: January 28, 2014.
Ron Curry,
Regional Administrator, Region 6.
[FR Doc. 2014-03439 Filed 2-14-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
_______________________________________ __ Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

September 28, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh 128389 Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices

v SC: 128389 COA: 251511 Wayne CC: 03-005153-01 DAVID TODD DALTON, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to app eal the February 17, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is cons idered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

t0919 I, CORBIN R. DAVIS, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 28, 2005

Clerk
EXHIBIT 31.4





CERTIFICATION





I,
Edward Lawton, certify that:





1. I
have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K of
SharpSpring, Inc.;





2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report.











Date:
April 30, 2018
Signature:
/s/ Edward LawtonEdward
LawtonChief
Financial Officer
(Principal
Financial Officer)
JOHNNY LEE HILL,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

___________________________/

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D17-3583

Opinion filed October 16, 2017.

Petition Alleging Ineffective Assistance of Appellate Counsel -- Original 

Jurisdiction.

Johnny Lee Hill, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is dismissed as 

untimely. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(d)(5).

LEWIS, KELSEY, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., CONCUR.
No. 48063.

#### Protests 904872-G, etc., of Eurasia Import Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the-authority of *United States*v. *Armand Schwab*(30 C. C. P. A. 72, C. A. D. 218) the protests were sustained.
June 12, 1962

Reap. Dec. 10272.

#### World Exports, Inc. *v.*United States,

reappraisement R61/19659, etc.

Reappraisements dismissed April 9, 1962. Entered at Miami, Fla. (Not published.) Motion by plaintiff.
AO 450 (Rev. 5/85) Judgment in a Civil Case

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

Eastern Division 

KIMBERLY DAVIS WHITESIDE,

Plaintiff,

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE

v.

CITY OF COLUMBUS, et al., CASE NO. 2:12-cv-1044

JUDGE EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR.

MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARK R. ABEL

Defendants.

Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues have

been tried and the jury has rendered its verdict.

Decision by Court. A decision has been rendered by the Court without a hearing or trial.

Pursuant to the Opinion and Order filed April 1, 2014, JUDGMENT is hereby

entered DISMISSING this case.

Date: April 1, 2014 JOHN P. HEHMAN, CLERK

/S/ Andy F. Quisumbing 

(By) Andy F. Quisumbing

 Courtroom Deputy Clerk

Case: 2:12-cv-01044-EAS-MRA Doc #: 20 Filed: 04/01/14 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Union Tank Car Company (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
period ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mark J. Garrette, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In witness whereof, I have executed this certification as of the 11thday of August, 2006.



/s/ Mark J. GarretteMark J. GarrettePrincipal Financial Officer
Exhibit 4.2.1


 


ADDENDUM NO. 1 TO 


WARRANT FOR THE PURCHASE OF


COMMON STOCK


December 28, 2021


 


This Addendum modifies the terms of the Warrant
granted by Corphousing, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Company”), to THA Family II Limited Liability Company.
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary, and giving effect any reverse stock split affected by the Company, the Warrant shall be exercisable
up to 250,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. Further, notwithstanding anything to the contrary, the Warrant shall be issuable
and become exercisable only upon successful completion of an initial public offering (“IPO”). If no IPO is completed, the
Warrant shall not be issued or deemed exercisable in any regard or manner.


 


	 	CORPHOUSING LLC
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Shanoop Kothari, CFO
	 	Title: 	CFO
	 	 	 
	 	THA FAMILY II LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Andrea Ferdinand 
	 	Title: 	Manager



 






    1
Order entered May 2 3 , 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 18
- 01272
- CV
INTO THE SUNSET REVO CABLE LIVING TRUST, Appellant
V.
DESIGN TECH HOMES LP , Appellee On App eal from the 274th District Court

Comal County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. C2017
- 2027C



### O RDER Before the Court is appellee’s May 10, 2019 second motion and May 21, 2019 supplemental second motion for an extensio n of time to file its brief on the merits

. Appellant
filed a response and supplemental response opposing the motion. We GRANT the motion as supplemented to the extent that appellee shall file its brief on the merits by June 1 0 , 2019 . We caution appellee that further extension requests will be st rongly disfavored.

/s/ BILL WHITEHILL JUSTICE
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>               5

<S>                             <C>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               AUG-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                  SEP-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    MAY-31-2000
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<CASH>                          310
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   0
<ALLOWANCES>                    0
<INVENTORY>                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                310
<PP&E>                          1,232,821
<DEPRECIATION>                  1,209,825
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  29,344
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           5,720,723
<BONDS>                         20,437
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<COMMON>                        38,258,096
<OTHER-SE>                      0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    29,344
<SALES>                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                0
<CGS>                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                748,101
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              1,880,839
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 0
<INCOME-TAX>                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             0
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    (2,628,940)
<EPS-BASIC>                   (.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                   (.07)


</TABLE>
Case: 2:12-cv-00704-EAS-NMK Doc #: 22 Filed: 03/12/13 Page: 1 of 11  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00704-EAS-NMK Doc #: 22 Filed: 03/12/13 Page: 2 of 11  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00704-EAS-NMK Doc #: 22 Filed: 03/12/13 Page: 3 of 11  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00704-EAS-NMK Doc #: 22 Filed: 03/12/13 Page: 4 of 11  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00704-EAS-NMK Doc #: 22 Filed: 03/12/13 Page: 5 of 11  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00704-EAS-NMK Doc #: 22 Filed: 03/12/13 Page: 6 of 11  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00704-EAS-NMK Doc #: 22 Filed: 03/12/13 Page: 7 of 11  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00704-EAS-NMK Doc #: 22 Filed: 03/12/13 Page: 8 of 11  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00704-EAS-NMK Doc #: 22 Filed: 03/12/13 Page: 9 of 11  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00704-EAS-NMK Doc #: 22 Filed: 03/12/13 Page: 10 of 11  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00704-EAS-NMK Doc #: 22 Filed: 03/12/13 Page: 11 of 11  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-12T10:17:56-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
Regular Totals (Operators)

Airport = EWR

Operator = 0001(Exclude)

Status Date = 01/01/2011 (History & Current)

02/23/2015 07:55:50

Query Parameters:
02/23/2015 07:55:50

Carrier

Regular Totals (Operators)

Slots Held less than 5 days are Excluded Excludes FAA Held PF7 Status Date = 01/01/2011 (History & Current)

EWR

AAL AMERICAN AIRLINES 30 

ACA AIR CANADA 18

AFR AIR FRANCE 2

AIC AIR INDIA 2

ASA ALASKA AIRLINES 4

ASH MESA AIRLINES 4

AVI L'AVION/OPENSKIES 4 

AZA ALITALIA 2

BAW BRITISH AIRWAYS 6

CAA ATLANTIC SOUTHEAST AIRLINES (code 5

COA CONTINENTAL AIRLINES 912

COM COMAIR AIRLINES 9

CPZ COMPASS AIRLINES 5

CSQ IBC AIRWAYS 2

DAL DELTA AIR LINES 37 

DLH DEUTSCHE LUFTHANSA 8

EGF AMR EAGLE HOLDING COPR. (FORMERLY 12

ELY EL AL ISRAEL AIRLINES 2

FDX FED EX 7

FLG ENDEAVOR AIR (dba NORTHWEST AIRLINK 2

JAI JET AIRWAYS 2

JBU JETBLUE AIRWAYS CORP. 29 

JZA AIR CANADA JAZZ 6

LOF TRANS STATES, INC. 2

MES MESABA AVIATION 5

PDT PIEDMONT AIRLINES, INC. (FORMERLY 8

POE PORTER AIRLINES 22

RPA REPUBLIC AIRLINE 4

SAS SCANDINAVIAN AIRLINES 4

SIA SINGAPORE AIRLINES LIMITED 2

SWR SWISS INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES (SWISSAIR 2

TAP TAP-AIR PORTUGAL 2

UAL UNITED AIRLINES 28

UPS UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 4

USA US AIRWAYS 19

VIR VIRGIN ATLANTIC AIR 4

Page 2
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-4036

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

DEANN HOLLOWAY,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Spartanburg. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District

Judge. (CR-01-670)

Submitted: May 12, 2005 Decided: May 17, 2005

Before TRAXLER, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David W. Plowden, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Greenville,

South Carolina, for Appellant. Jonathan Scott Gasser, Acting

United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, William Corley

Lucius, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Deann Holloway appeals the district court’s judgment

revoking a probation sentence on her conviction for conspiring to

defraud the United States in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371 (2000),

and resentencing her to ten months in prison followed by two years

of supervised release. Holloway’s attorney has filed a brief

pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), asserting

there are no meritorious legal issues but arguing the district

court abused its discretion. Holloway has been informed of her

right to file a pro se supplemental brief but has not done so. 

We review a district court’s judgment revoking a

probation sentence for abuse of discretion. Burns v. United

States, 287 U.S. 216, 222 (1932). Upon finding a probation

violation, the district court may revoke probation and resentence

the defendant to any sentence within the statutory maximum for the

original offense. 18 U.S.C. § 3565(a) (2000); United States v.

Schaefer, 120 F.3d 505, 507 (4th Cir. 1997). Holloway’s sentence

fell within the guidelines range of 4-10 months and was clearly

below the five year statutory maximum. Thus, we find the district

court did not abuse its discretion.

In accordance with Anders, we have reviewed the entire

record in this case and have found no meritorious issues for

appeal. We, therefore, affirm the district court’s judgment. This

court requires that counsel inform his client, in writing, of her
- 3 -

right to petition the Supreme Court of the United States for

further review. If the client requests that a petition be filed,

but counsel believes that such a petition would be frivolous, then

counsel may move in this court for leave to withdraw from

representation. Counsel’s motion must state that a copy thereof

was served on the client. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decision process.

AFFIRMED
# Official Journal C 350/2020

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 350 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6320 October 2020 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 350

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6320 October 2020

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | III   Preparatory acts |
| | COURT OF AUDITORS |
| 2020/C 350/01 | Opinion No 6/2020
  (pursuant to Article 287(4) and 322(1)(a), TFEU)
  concerning the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a Recovery and Resilience Facility (COM(2020) 408) | 1 |

Contents

page

III   Preparatory acts

COURT OF AUDITORS

2020/C 350/01

Opinion No 6/2020
  (pursuant to Article 287(4) and 322(1)(a), TFEU)
  concerning the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a Recovery and Resilience Facility (COM(2020) 408)

(pursuant to Article 287(4) and 322(1)(a), TFEU)

(COM(2020) 408)

1

---

| | Corrigenda |
| --- | --- |
| | Corrigendum to Opinion No 5/2020 (pursuant to Articles 288(4) and 322(1)(a), TFEU) on the Commission’s 2020/0006 (COD) proposals of 14 January 2020 and of 28 May 2020 for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the Just Transition Fund (COM(2020) 22 final and COM(2020) 460 final)
  ( OJ C 290, 1.9.2020 ) | 29 |

Corrigenda

Corrigendum to Opinion No 5/2020 (pursuant to Articles 288(4) and 322(1)(a), TFEU) on the Commission’s 2020/0006 (COD) proposals of 14 January 2020 and of 28 May 2020 for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the Just Transition Fund (COM(2020) 22 final and COM(2020) 460 final)
  ( OJ C 290, 1.9.2020 )

(pursuant to Articles 288(4) and 322(1)(a), TFEU)

(COM(2020) 22 final and COM(2020) 460 final)

( OJ C 290, 1.9.2020 )

29

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
No. 40351.

#### Protests 712973-G, etc., of Alfred Kohlberg, Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel it was held that the invoices were consulated at Swatow, China, and should have been converted at the federal reserve rate quoted for the yuan Swatow dollar on the dates of exportation therefrom.
INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 11-0290

Post-Focus Draft Revision 2 6/15/2011

ENGINEER: Arnold \ JD

PV (kg/yr):

SUBMITTER: 

USE: 

 

OTHER USES: 

 

 

MSDS: No Label: No

TLV/PEL:

CRSS :

Chemical Name: 

S-H20: 0.000001 g/L @

VP: 1.0E-6 torr @

MW: %<500 %<1000

Physical State and Misc CRSS Info:

EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 4
p110290.en2.txt

Consumer Use: 

SAT (concerns) (04/26/2011):

Related Cases and Related Cases and Misc SAT Info: 

Migration to groundwater: negl - rapid

PBT rating: P3B3T1 .

Health: 1

Eco: 1 No releases to Water

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: NR

NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS:

Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER. 

POLLUTION PREVENTION CONSIDERATIONS:

P2 Claim: 

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 11-0290

Number of Sites/ Location: 

Days/yr: 

Basis:

Process Description:

EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 4
p110290.en2.txt

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

IRER Note: The daily releases listed for any source below

may coincide with daily releases from the other sources

to the same medium. |

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

Tot. # of workers exposed via assessed routes: 

Basis:

Inhalation:

Dermal:

 

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 11-0290

Number of Sites/ Location: 

Days/yr: 

Basis:

Process Description:

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

IRER Note: The daily releases listed for any source below

may coincide with daily releases from the other sources

to the same medium. 

EPA SANITIZED Page 3 of 4
p110290.en2.txt

Output 2: kg/site-day over days/yr from site

to:

from:

basis: 

RELEASE TOTAL

kg/yr - all sites

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

Tot. # of workers exposed via assessed routes: 

Basis:

Inhalation:

Dermal:

EPA SANITIZED Page 4 of 4
No. 49355.

#### Protests 849821-G, etc., of Henry V. Allien & Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J,

The record showed that certain of the items in question consisted of woven fabrics in chief value of metal threads, the same in all material respects as items involved in *Meyer*v. *United States*(6 Cust. Ct. 191, C. D. 459), which record was incorporated herein. In accordance therewith the claim at 40 percent under paragraph 385 and T. D. 48316 w-as sustained to this extent.