alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A16A1898. WILLIAM LEE TURNER v. THE STATE.

In 2012, William Lee Turner pled guilty to trafficking cocaine and illegal use

of a communication facility, for which he was sentenced to 30 years’ imprisonment

with 20 years to serve. Turner subsequently filed a pro se motion to correct a void

sentence. The trial court denied the motion on March 29, 2016, and Turner filed a

notice of appeal on May 2, 2016. We, however, lack jurisdiction for two reasons.

First, a notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days after entry of the

appealable order. See OCGA § 5-6-38 (a). The proper and timely filing of a notice

of appeal is an absolute requirement to confer jurisdiction on this Court. See 

Rowland v. State, 264 Ga. 872, 872 (1) (452 SE2d 756) (1995). Because Turner filed

his notice of appeal 34 days after entry of the trial court’s order, his appeal is

untimely.

Second, pursuant to OCGA § 17-10-1 (f), a court may correct or reduce a

sentence during the year after its imposition, or within 120 days after remittitur

following a direct appeal, whichever is later. Once this statutory period expires, a

trial court may only modify a void sentence. See Frazier v. State, 302 Ga. App. 346,

348 (691 SE2d 346) (2010). A direct appeal may lie from an order denying a motion

to vacate or correct a void sentence, but only if the defendant raises a colorable claim

that the sentence is, in fact, void. See Id. “Motions to vacate a void sentence

generally are limited to claims that – even assuming the existence and validity of the

conviction for which the sentence was imposed – the law does not authorize that

sentence, most typically because it exceedsthe most severe punishment for which the

applicable penal statute provides.” von Thomas v. State, 293 Ga. 569, 572 (2) (748

June 27, 2016
SE2d 446) (2013). Thus, when a sentence is within the statutory range of

punishment, it is not void. See Jones v. State, 278 Ga. 669, 670 (604 SE2d 483)

(2004). Accordingly, allegations that merely challenge the sentencing procedure or

question the fairness of a sentence do not raise a colorable claim of voidness and

cannot form the basis for a direct appeal. See Frazier, supra at 348. Here, Turner 

does not argue that his sentence fell outside the permissible statutory range; but rather

he challenges his indictment. Thus, Turner has not raised a colorable void sentence

claim. Accordingly, we lack jurisdiction over this appeal, which is hereby

DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

06/27/2016
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                   EXHIBIT 11
                                TSI Incorporated
                        Computation of Per Share Earnings

                                          Three Months Ended Dec. 31,      Nine Months Ended Dec. 31,
                                              1996            1995           1996             1995
                                          -----------     -----------     -----------     -----------
<S>                                       <C>             <C>             <C>             <C>       
Primary
Average shares outstanding                 11,276,305      10,840,844      11,245,038      10,590,676
Net effect of dilutive stock options,
based on the treasury stock method
using average market price                    437,497         467,044         445,753         408,638
                                          -----------     -----------     -----------     -----------
Total                                      11,713,802      11,307,888      11,690,791      10,999,314

Net Earnings                              $ 2,193,098     $ 1,874,967     $ 5,675,344     $ 3,369,913

Primary per share amounts                 $       .19     $       .17     $       .49     $       .31


Fully Diluted

Average shares                             11,276,305      10,840,844      11,245,038      10,590,676

Net effect of dilutive stock options,
based on the treasury stock method
using the period-end market price,
if higher than the average market
price                                         491,403         538,518         516,387         576,290
                                          -----------     -----------     -----------     -----------

Total                                      11,767,708      11,379,362      11,761,425      11,166,966

Net Earnings                              $ 2,193,098     $ 1,874,967     $ 5,675,344     $ 3,369,913

Fully diluted per share amounts           $       .19     $       .16     $       .49     $       .30
</TABLE>
June 14, 1955

No. 59163.

protests 232271-K, etc.

#### Globe Overseas Co. *v.*United States,

(Initial No. 241013-K.) Plaintiff’s application for rehearing granted.
Case: 2:12-cv-01196-EAS-EPD Doc #: 55 Filed: 11/15/13 Page: 1 of 1  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-12T10:55:28-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
Exhibit 99.1
                                           For more information contact:
                                           C. J. Monsma (919/775-2201)
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

   TRION EXPLORES STRATEGIC OPTIONS AND SUSPENDS QUARTERLY DIVIDEND 

Sanford, NC, November 4, 1998 - TRION, INC. (NASDAQ: TRON)
With the termination of the McLeod Russel merger agreement on October 
15, 1998, Trion's Board of Directors has reviewed the strategic 
alternatives available to the Company.  Given the Company's current 
share price as well as the long-term outlook for its business and 
industry, the primary objective established by the Board is to maximize 
shareholder value.  The Board has determined not to pursue a sale of the 
Company at this time, pending year-end results; however, the Board will 
consider unsolicited expressions of interest it might receive from third 
parties.  Management's immediate focus is on growing the business in the 
attractive end markets that enhance profitability including HEPA/ULPA 
filtration, residential IAQ products and dust collection.  

Steven L. Schneider, President and Chief Executive Officer, stated: 
"Based on the solid performance of our traditional residential and 
commercial/industrial markets in North America and Europe, and if the 
Asian market stabilizes and the developing improvements in the 
microelectronics market continue, we believe our strategic focus will be 
successful."
                                    (more)
Page 2
November 4, 1998
Trion, Inc.

Trion's Board also voted to suspend the quarterly dividend indefinitely.  
The previous quarter's dividend was precluded by the merger agreement 
with McLeod Russel which was subsequently terminated on a mutual basis.  
The cash retained by suspending the dividend will be reinvested in the 
Company for future growth and debt repayment.

Forward looking statements in this release are made pursuant to the safe 
harbor provisions of the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act 
of 1995.  Such forward looking statements involve risks, uncertainties 
and other factors which may cause the actual results, performance or 
achievements of the Company to be materially different from any future 
results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such 
statements. 

These factors include, among others, the following: general economic and 
business conditions; success of operating initiatives; changes in 
business strategy or plans; availability, terms and development of 
capital; and other factors described in filings of the Company with the 
S.E.C.  The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update or 
revise any forward looking statements, whether as a result of new 
information, future events or otherwise.

Trion, a leader in indoor air quality (IAQ) since 1947, specializes in 
products that focus on health and safety with specific emphasis on the 
environment in industry and the home.  Trion is a publicly traded 
company and is listed as TRON on the NASDAQ exchange.
                                     ###
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-6929

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

CEDRIC DEON WASHINGTON,

 Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at 

Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge. (2:09-cr-00800-DCN-4)

Submitted: October 15, 2021 Decided: January 11, 2022

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, THACKER, Circuit Judge, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Cedric Deon Washington, Appellant Pro Se. Sean Kittrell, Assistant United States 

Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, South Carolina, 

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 21-6929 Doc: 13 Filed: 01/11/2022 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Cedric Deon Washington, a federal prisoner, appeals from the district court’s order 

denying his motion for compassionate release pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A), as 

amended by the First Step Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115-391, § 603(b)(1), 132 Stat. 5194, 

5239. We review a district court’s order denying a compassionate release motion for abuse 

of discretion. United States v. Kibble, 992 F.3d 326, 329 (4th Cir. 2021), cert. denied, No. 

21-5624, 2021 WL 4733616 (U.S. Oct. 12, 2021). We have reviewed the record and 

discern no abuse of discretion. The district court denied Washington’s motion after 

assessing the applicable 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors and sufficiently explained its reasons 

for the denial. See United States v. High, 997 F.3d 181, 188-91 (4th Cir. 2021) (discussing 

amount of explanation required for denial of compassionate release motion). We therefore 

affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument 

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

USCA4 Appeal: 21-6929 Doc: 13 Filed: 01/11/2022 Pg: 2 of 2
AO 450 (Rev. 5/85) Judgment in a Civil Case

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

Eastern Division 

JOHN FISHER,

Plaintiff,

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE

vs.

 CASE NO. 2:12-cv-734

DEPUTY SHERIFF RANDY JUDGE EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR.

SECOY, ET AL., MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH P. DEAVERS

Defendants.

Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues have

been tried and the jury has rendered its verdict.

Decision by Court. A decision has been rendered by the Court without a hearing or trial.

Pursuant to the Opinion and Order filed September 19, 2013, JUDGMENT is

hereby entered DISMISSING this case.

Date: September 19, 2013 JOHN P. HEHMAN, CLERK

/S/ Andy F. Quisumbing 

(By) Andy F. Quisumbing

 Courtroom Deputy Clerk

Case: 2:12-cv-00734-EAS-EPD Doc #: 18 Filed: 09/19/13 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
# Official Journal C 352/2016

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 352 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5927 September 2016 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 352

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5927 September 2016

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Preparatory acts |
| | COUNCIL |
| 2016/C 352/01 | Position (EU) No 13/2016 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the accessibility of the websites and mobile applications of public sector bodiesAdopted by the Council on 18 July 2016 (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| 2016/C 352/02 | Statement of the Council's reasons: Position (EU) No 13/2016 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the accessibility of the websites and mobile applications of public sector bodies | 16 |

Notice No

Contents

page

III   Preparatory acts

COUNCIL

2016/C 352/01

Position (EU) No 13/2016 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the accessibility of the websites and mobile applications of public sector bodiesAdopted by the Council on 18 July 2016 (
  1
  )

1

1

2016/C 352/02

Statement of the Council's reasons: Position (EU) No 13/2016 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the accessibility of the websites and mobile applications of public sector bodies

16

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

ROBERT L. GRAY and ZILLAH R. ) JORDAN-GRAY a/k/a ZILLAH GRAY, ) ) Appellants, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D16-4085 ) U.S. BANK, N.A., as trustee, on behalf ) Of the J.P. Morgan Mortgage ) Acquisition Corp. 2006-FRE2 Asset ) Backed Pass-Through Certificates, ) Series 2006-FRE2; UNITED STATES ) OF AMERICA; UNKNOWN TENANT ) IN POSSESSION OF THE SUBJECT ) PROPERTY, ) ) Appellees. ) ___________________________________) Opinion filed March 6, 2019. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Thomas H. Minkoff, Judge. Robert E. Biasotti of Biasotti Law, St. Petersburg, for Appellants. William L. Grimsley and Peter J. Maskow of McGlinchey Stafford, Jacksonville, for Appellee U.S. Bank, N.A., as trustee of behalf of the J.P. Morgan Mortgage Acquisition Corp. 2006-FRE2 Asset Backed Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006- FRE. No appearance for remaining Appellees.- 2 -

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CASANUEVA, KHOUZAM, and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002



Joel Klopfer  the Chief
Executive Officer,  and Director of SAFECODE DRUG TECHNOLOGIES CORP  , certifies, under the standards set forth
and solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his
knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Registrant for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in that Form 10-K fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and  results of operations of the Registrant.



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



|Date: April 12, 2012 | SafeCode Drug Technologies Corp                                       
|-------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------
|                     |                                                                       
|                     | By:                                                                   
|                     | Name:
        Title:    Chief
        Executive Officer, and  Director



A signed original of this written statement required
by Section 906 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE



Reference is hereby made
to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of March 1, 2016, by and among DEUTSCHE MORTGAGE & ASSET RECEIVING
CORPORATION, as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, CWCAPITAL ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC, as Special
Servicer, WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS, as Certificate Administrator,
Paying Agent and Custodian and PARK BRIDGE LENDER SERVICES LLC, as Operating Advisor and Asset Representations Reviewer with respect
to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, COMM 2016-DC2 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not
otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.



Pursuant to Section 10.11
of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities of the Master Servicer
during the period from March 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance per
the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review,
the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting
Period.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------







IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the
undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2017.







Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President 
Wells Fargo Bank



























Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
No. 62039.

#### Bloomingdale Bros. (a Div. of Fed. Dept. Stores, Inc.) *v.*United States,

protest 212819-K (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the-articles herein are similar in all material respects to the mustard pots the subject of *Julliard Fancy Foods Co.*v. *United States*(33 Cust. Ct. 1, C. D. 1625), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 50222.

#### Protests 55305-K, etc., of Lovell Dressel Co., Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the court found that the facts herein agreed upon were such as to bring the case within the holding in *John Barr*v. *United States*(11 Cust. Ct. 88, C. D. 801), which record was incorporated herein. (See *John Barr*v. *United States,*324 U. S. 83, decided February 5, 1945.) In accordance therewith it was held that the currency of the invoices should be converted at the buying rate in the New York market at noon on the day of exportation (the “free” rate of exchange for pounds sterling), as certified by the Federal Reserve bank and set forth by the collector on each of the entries. The protests were sustained to this extent.
Exhibit 10(o)



                             AGREEMENT TO TERMINATE

                        QUOTA SHARE REINSURANCE AGREEMENT
                         Effective as of January 1, 1995
                  (hereinafter referred to as the "Agreement")

                                     between

    21ST CENTURY INSURANCE COMPANY (formerly 20th Century Insurance Company)
                        and 21ST CENTURY CASUALTY COMPANY
                   (hereinafter referred to as the "Cedants")

                                       and

                    AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY
                  (hereinafter referred to as the "Reinsurer")


Pursuant to ARTICLE XIII of the Agreement, the parties hereto agree to terminate
such Agreement, effective 12:00 P.M. (Midnight) August 31, 2002 (the Termination
Date).

As  stated  in  ARTICLE XIII of the Agreement, "In the event of termination, the
Reinsurer  shall refund to the Cedants the applicable unearned premium minus the
ceding  commission  and shall continue to remain liable for all losses occurring
prior  to  the  date  of  termination. However, if this Contract shall terminate
while  a  loss  occurrence  covered hereunder is in progress, it is agreed that,
subject  to  the other conditions of this contract, the Reinsurer is responsible
for  its  proportion  of  the  entire  loss.

In consideration for the early termination of this Agreement, the parties hereto
further  agree that Reinsurer shall be entitled to be paid a fee by 21st Century
Insurance  Company  of nine hundred thousand dollars ($900,000), payable in cash
within  15  days  of  the  Termination  Date  hereof.

IN WITNESS THEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed
by  their  duly  authorized  representatives.

                         21st CENTURY INSURANCE COMPANY
                          21ST CENTURY CASUALTY COMPANY


By:
       ------------------------------
Title:
       ------------------------------
Date:
       ------------------------------


                    AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY

By:
       ------------------------------
Title:
       ------------------------------
Date:
       ------------------------------


                                                                              24
<PAGE>