alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
110 STAT. 3142 PUBLIC LAW 104–242—OCT. 9, 1996

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 680 (S. 1012):

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 104–316 (Comm. on Commerce).

SENATE REPORTS: No. 104–162 accompanying S. 1012 (Comm. on Energy and

Natural Resources).

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD:

Vol. 141 (1995): Nov. 13, considered and passed House.

Vol. 142 (1996): Sept. 27, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 104–242

104th Congress

An Act

To extend the time for construction of certain FERC licensed hydro projects.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION.

Notwithstanding the limitations of section 13 of the Federal

Power Act, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, upon the

request of the licensee or licensees for FERC projects numbered

4244 and 10648 (and after reasonable notice), is authorized in

accordance with the good faith, due diligence, and public interest

requirements of such section 13 and the Commission’s procedures

under such section, to extend the time required for commencement

of construction for each of such projects for up to a maximum

of 3 consecutive 2-year periods. This section shall take effect for

the projects upon the expiration of the extension (issued by the

Commission under such section 13) of the period required for

commencement of construction of each such project.

Approved October 9, 1996.

Effective date.

Oct. 9, 1996

[H.R. 680]
121 STAT. 1354 PUBLIC LAW 110–126—NOV. 30, 2007 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 3325: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 153 (2007): 

Oct. 1, considered and passed House. 

Nov. 16, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 110–126 

110th Congress 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 235 Mountain 

Road in Suffield, Connecticut, as the ‘‘Corporal Stephen R. Bixler Post Office’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. CORPORAL STEPHEN R. BIXLER POST OFFICE. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 235 Mountain Road in Suffield, Connecticut, 

shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Corporal Stephen R. Bixler 

Post Office’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Corporal Stephen R. Bixler Post Office’’. 

Approved November 30, 2007. 

Nov. 30, 2007 

[H.R. 3325] 


jbridges on POFP91QD1 with PUBLIC LAWS
June 28, 2016 Docket Management Facility U.S. DepartmentofTransportation 1200 New JerseyAvenue, SE West Building Ground Floor Room W12-140 Washington, DC 20590 

# SEADOR..._.E

Re: Request for Interim 120 day Extension of Exemption No. 10177E, FAA Docket No. FAA2010-0970 Docket Management Facility: By letter dated May 25, 2016, Seaborne Airlines requested that Exemption No. 10177 be extended for a 2 year period till June 30, 2018. The current exemption, No. 10177E, is setto expire on June 30, 2016. The exemption, as amended, allows Seaborne Airlines to continue to operate DHC-6-300 float-equipped airplanes without meeting certain aircraft performance requirements. Seaborne Airlines has operated under the original exemption since 2010 and has met all conditions and limitations under the previous exemptions as amended. Seaborne Airlines expects that the most recent request for a 2 year extension 

### will be granted, however, to the extentthat the FAA's review ofthe May 25, 2016 request cannot be completed by June 30, 2016 this interim request for a 120-day extension is made to ensure the continued operations of 24 daily flights operated by Seaborne Airlines under the current extension while the FAA completes its review. Without a grant of exemption or 120 day extension, a disruption to Seaborne operations will occurafterJune 30, involvingcanceled flights and disruption to passenger travel plans, which is notin thepublic interest. Once again, Seaborne Airlines has operated successfully under Exemption No. 10177, as amended over the years, and expects the FAA to grant a 2-year extension as it has over the last years. However, to preventa disruption to our operations after June 30, 2016, we respectfully submitthis request for a 120day interim extension while the FAA completes its review. Should you have any questions, please do nothesitate to contact me. Thankyou for yourtime and consideration.

Jesus Me na I VP of Operations Seaborne Airlines I 268 Munoz Rtvera Avenue, 9th Floor I Hato Rey, Puerto Rico 00918 (e) jesus

.medina@seaborrneairlines

.com I (p) 787-946-8741 (c) 787-234-6281 (w) www.seaborneairlines.com

WORLD PLAZA BUILDING 268 MuAoz RIVERA AVENUE FLOOR 9 SAN JUAN PR 00918 787 916 8711
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services (hhs)

###### Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dr. Lewis V. Wade, Executive Secretary, NIOSH, CDC, 4676 Columbia Parkway, Cincinnati, Ohio 45226, telephone 513.533.6825, fax 513.533.6826. 

                        The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been delegated the authority to sign                         **Federal Register**                         notices pertaining to announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, for both CDC and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.                     

Dated: April 20, 2007. 

Elaine L. Baker, 

Acting Director, Management Analysis and Services Office Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 

 [FR Doc. E7-8077 Filed 4-25-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
# Official Journal L 160/2020

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 160 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6325 May 2020 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 160

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6325 May 2020

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/684 of 18 May 2020 approving non-minor amendments to the specification for a name entered in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (‘Kaki Ribera del Xúquer’ (PDO)) | 1 |
| | * | Commission Regulation (EU) 2020/685 of 20 May 2020 amending Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 as regards maximum levels of perchlorate in certain foods (
  1
  ) | 3 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/684 of 18 May 2020 approving non-minor amendments to the specification for a name entered in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (‘Kaki Ribera del Xúquer’ (PDO))

1

*

Commission Regulation (EU) 2020/685 of 20 May 2020 amending Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 as regards maximum levels of perchlorate in certain foods (
  1
  )

1

3

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO.: 2:13-cr-289 (07)

JUDGE SMITH

MAGISTRATE JUDGE KING

CHARLES H. THOMPSON,

Defendant.

ORDER

On January 16, 2015, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), recommending that the Court accept Defendant’s guilty plea to Count One

of the Second Superseding Indictment charging him with conspiracy to possess with intent to

distribute heroin, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846.

Defendant, represented by counsel, waived his right to appear on the matter before a District

Judge. The Magistrate Judge conducted the colloquy required by Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of

Criminal Procedure. Defendant’s plea was knowing, voluntary, free from coercion, and had a basis

in fact. 

Defendant was specifically informed of his right to contest the Report and Recommendation

by filing any objections within 14 days of the issuance of the Report and Recommendation pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(B) and Rule 72(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Defendant did

not file any objections. 

Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation and ACCEPTS 

Defendant’s plea of guilty to Count One of the Second Superseding Indictment. Defendant is hereby

Case: 2:13-cr-00289-EAS Doc #: 262 Filed: 02/25/15 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
adjudged guilty of conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute heroin.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 /s/ George C. Smith 

GEORGE C. SMITH, JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

-2-

Case: 2:13-cr-00289-EAS Doc #: 262 Filed: 02/25/15 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
# C_2016335EN.01002002.xml

| 12.9.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 335/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.9.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 335/20

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 7 July 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Pécsi Törvényszék — Hungary) — Hőszig Kft. v Alstom Power Thermal Services

(Case C-222/15) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Jurisdiction clause - Judicial cooperation in civil matters - Jurisdiction and the enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters - Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 - Article 23 - Clause inserted in the general conditions - Consent of the parties to those conditions - Validity and precision of such a clause))

(2016/C 335/27)

Language of the case: Hungary

Referring court

Referring court

Pécsi Törvényszék

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Hőszig Kft.

Applicant:

Defendant: Alstom Power Thermal Services,

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 23(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters must be interpreted as meaning that a jurisdiction clause, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which, first, is set out in the client’s general terms and conditions, referred to in the instruments witnessing the contracts between those parties and forwarded upon their conclusion, and, secondly, designates as courts with jurisdiction those of a city of a Member State, meets the requirements of that provision relating to the consent of the parties and the precision of the content of such a clause.

---

(1)  OJ C 245, 27.7.2015.

1

---
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-7232
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus GLENDA MARIE PORTER, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert D. Potter, Senior District Judge. (CR-93-149-P, CA-97-223-P) Submitted: December 11, 1997 Decided: December 31, 1997 Before HALL and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.Glenda Marie Porter, Appellant Pro Se. Harry Thomas Church, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion andfind no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Porter , Nos. CR-93-149-P; CA-97-223-P (W.D.N.C. Aug. 15, 1997). We dispense with oral argument becausethe facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
# C_2017104EN.01001601.xml

| 3.4.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 104/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 104/16

---

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 26 January 2017 — French Republic v European Commission, Kingdom of Spain

(Case C-373/15 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) - Expenditure excluded from EU financing - Regulations (EC) No 1698/2005, (EC) No 1975/2006 and (EC) No 796/2004 - Rural development support measures - Areas with natural handicaps - On-the-spot controls - Coefficient density of livestock - Counting of animals))

(2017/C 104/23)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Appellant: French Republic (represented initially by: F. Alabrune, G. de Bergues, D. Colas and C. Candat, and subsequently by G. de Bergues, D. Colas, F. Fize and A. Daly, acting as Agents)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: Kingdom of Spain (represented by: D. Bianchi and G. von Rintelen, acting as Agents), European Commission (represented by: D. Bianchi and G. von Rintelen, acting as Agents)

Other parties to the proceedings:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Sets aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 30 April 2015, France v Commission (T-259/13, not published, EU:T:2015:250); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Sets aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 30 April 2015, France v Commission (T-259/13, not published, EU:T:2015:250);

| 2. | Refers the case back to the General Court of the European Union; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Refers the case back to the General Court of the European Union;

| 3. | Reserves the costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Reserves the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 294, 7.9.2015.

1

---
III 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 68 

Designating March 2, 2005, as ‘‘Read Across America Day’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 28, 2005 

Ms. COLLINS (for herself, Mr. REED, and Mr. KENNEDY) submitted the 

following resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating March 2, 2005, as ‘‘Read Across America Day’’. 

Whereas reading is a basic requirement for quality education 

and professional success, and is a source of pleasure 

throughout life; 

Whereas the people of the United States must be able to read 

if the United States is to remain competitive in the global 

economy; 

Whereas Congress, through the No Child Left Behind Act of 

2001 (Public Law 107–110) and the Reading First, 

Early Reading First, and Improving Literacy Through 

School Libraries programs, has placed great emphasis on 

reading intervention and providing additional resources 

for reading assistance; and 

Whereas more than 40 national associations concerned about 

reading and education have joined with the National 
2 

•SRES 68 ATS

Education Association to use March 2, the anniversary of 

the birth of Theodor Geisel, also known as Dr. Seuss, to 

celebrate reading: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates March 2, 2005, as ‘‘Read Across 

3 America Day’’; 

4 (2) honors Theodor Geisel, also known as Dr. 

5 Seuss, for his success in encouraging children to dis6 cover the joy of reading; 

7 (3) encourages parents to read with their chil8 dren for at least 30 minutes on Read Across Amer9 ica Day in honor of Dr. Seuss and in celebration of 

10 reading; and 

11 (4) encourages the people of the United States 

12 to observe the day with appropriate ceremonies and 

13 activities. 

Æ
No. 45165.

#### Protest 23398-K of C. L. Powell Co. (Boston).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

Prom an examination of the papers the court was unable to find anything sufficient to overcome the presumption of correctness attaching to the collector’s action. The protest was therefore overruled.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-7821

In Re: CYRUS JONATHAN GEORGE,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CA-90-78)

Submitted: January 16, 2003 Decided: January 27, 2003

Before WILLIAMS, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Cyrus Jonathan George, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Cyrus Jonathan George petitions for a writ of mandamus,

alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his motion

to alter or amend the judgment in his criminal case. He seeks an

order from this court directing the district court to act.

Although we find that mandamus relief is not warranted because the

delay is not unreasonable, we deny the mandamus petition without

prejudice to the filing of another mandamus petition if the

district court does not act expeditiously. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process. 

PETITION DENIED
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL 

Saitta 

J. 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

vert.4; 

Hardesty 

j. 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA 

BARRY CRAIG MALONE, 

Appellant, 

vs. 

THE STATE OF NEVADA, 

Respondent. 

No. 68487 

FILED 

JUN 2 7 2016 

This is an appeal from a district court order denying a 

postconviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Eighth Judicial 

District Court, Clark County; Carolyn Ellsworth, Judge. 

Notice of entry of the challenged order was served on 

appellant and his counsel by mail on June 12, 2015. Because the notice of 

appeal was filed in the district court on July 20, 2015, four days beyond 

the relevant appeal period, see NRS 34.575(1); NRAP 26(c), and appellant 

has failed to demonstrate that he delivered the notice of appeal to a prison 

official for mailing on or before the expiration of the appeal period, see 

NEAP 4(d), we conclude that the notice of appeal was not timely filed. 

Therefore, we lack jurisdiction, see Lozada v. State, 110 Nev. 349, 352, 871 

P.2d 944, 946 (1994), and we 

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED. 

• 

kc) a-cf.P2i (0) 1947A 
cc: Hon. Carolyn Ellsworth, District Judge 

The Law Office of Dan M. Winder, P.C. 

Terrence M. Jackson 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Clark County District Attorney 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

Barry Craig Malone 

2 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A e
(A. R. D. 48)

#### Westfeldt Brothers *v.*United States

Entry No. 243, etc.

First Division, Appellate Term

(Decided September 16, 1954)

*Barnes, Richardson & Colburn*for the appellant.

*Warren E. Burger,*Assistant Attorney General, for the appellee.

Before Oliver, Mollison, and Wilson, Judges

Oliver, Chief Judge:

This application for review having been formally abandoned is hereby dismissed.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
No. 62058.

#### United China & Glass Co. *v.*United States,

protest 316191-K/14980 (New Orleans).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel that the decorated earthenware wall planters are entireties in chief value of decorated earthenware, not tableware, valued at over $3 per dozen, said merchandise was held dutiable at 10 cents per dozen pieces and 35 percent ad valorem under paragraph 211, as modified, *supra,*if the body is wholly of clay, or as modified by the Annecy Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T. D. 52373), supplemented by Presidential proclamation (T. D. 52476), if the body is not wholly of clay. The claim that the specific rate of 10 cents per dozen pieces is not applicable to the pieces of wood in the articles was overruled, the court holding that since the merchandise is classifiable as an entirety in chief value of decorated earthenware, it is properly dutiable at both the specific and the ad valorem rates applicable to decorated earthenware and that, therefore, each piece must be counted in assessing the rate of 10 cents per dozen pieces, even though one piece is composed of wood rather than of earthenware. *United States*v. *S. H. Kress & Co. et al.*(23 C. C. P. A. 90, T. D. 47764) followed.