alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Enclosure No. 1: Listing of Philadelphia AMS RACT Determinations for the 1997 8-Hour 

Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard

Appendix A – Philadelphia AMS SIP Revision Tracking Number 20140626 

Appendix A addresses source-specific RACT determinations for the following major sources of

NOx: Exelon Generating Company – Delaware Station; Exelon Generating Company –

Richmond Station; Exelon Generating Company – Schuylkill Station; Veolia Energy 

Philadelphia – Edison Station; and Veolia Energy Philadelphia – Schuylkill Station.

This appendix also includes revisions to the RACT plan approvals for: Exelon Generating 

Company – Richmond Station; Veolia Energy Philadelphia – Edison Station; and Veolia Energy 

Philadelphia – Schuylkill Station. Philadelphia AMS provided a public comment period for this 

SIP revision from June 26, 2014, to July 28, 2014, and prepared a Comment and Response 

document. 

Appendix B – Philadelphia AMS SIP Revision Tracking Number 20140918

Appendix B addresses source-specific RACT determinations for certain major sources of VOC 

or NOx, or both and certifies that certain previously adopted source-specific RACT controls 

approved by the EPA in the Pennsylvania SIP under the 1-hour ozone NAAQS continue to 

adequately represent RACT for the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS. The public comment period for 

this SIP revision took place from September 18, 2014, to October 20, 2014, and a Comment and 

Response document was prepared. 

Revised RACT plan approvals are also enclosed for the following facilities: Cardone Industries; 

Honeywell International, formerly Sunoco Chemical – Frankford Plant; Kinder Morgan Liquid 

Terminals, formerly GATX; PaperWorks, formerly Jefferson Smurfit; Philadelphia Energy 

Solutions Refinery, formerly Sunoco Refinery; Philadelphia Gas Works – Richmond; and 

Temple University – Health Sciences. 

This Appendix also includes new RACT plan approvals which were not part of the 1-hour ozone 

RACT for the following facilities: Grays Ferry Cogeneration Partnership; Temple University –

Main Campus; and Veolia Energy Efficiency.
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeals of

-- ) ) The Boeing Company ) ) Under Contract No. FA8106-04-C-0006 et al. ) APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT:

APPEARANCES FORTHE GOVERNMENT: ASBCA Nos. 60186, 60187

Andrew E. Shipley, Esq. Seth H. Locke, Esq.

Perkins Coie LLP Washington, DC E. Michael Chiaparas, Esq.

DCMA ChiefTrial Attorney Douglas R. Jacobson, Esq.

Trial Attorney Defense Contract Management Agency Bloomington, MN ORDER OF DISMISSAL The dispute has been settled. The appeals are dismissed with prejudice. Dated: 11 January 2017

MARK N. STEMPLER Administrative Judge Vice Chairman Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals I certify that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Order ofDismissal ofthe Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals in ASBCA Nos. 60186, 60187, Appeals ofThe Boeing Company, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. Dated:

JEFFREYD. GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 79 (Wednesday, April 25, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 20559]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-7880]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[F-14868-B; AK-964-1410-KC-P]


Alaska Native Claims Selection

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of decision approving lands for conveyance.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: As required by 43 CFR 2650.7(d), notice is hereby given that 
an appealable decision approving lands for conveyance pursuant to the 
Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act will be issued to 
K'oyit[lstrok]'ots'ina, Limited, Successor in Interest to Bin Googa, 
Inc. The lands are in the vicinity of Huslia, Alaska, and are located 
in:

Kateel River Meridian, Alaska

T. 6 N., R. 13 E.,
    Secs. 31 and 32.
    Containing 992.19 acres.

    The subsurface estate in these lands will be conveyed to Doyon, 
Limited when the surface estate is conveyed to K'oyit[lstrok]'ots'ina, 
Limited, Successor in Interest to Bin Googa, Inc. Notice of the 
decision will also be published four times in the Fairbanks Daily News 
Miner.

DATES: The time limits for filing an appeal are:
    1. Any party claiming a property interest which is adversely 
affected by the decision shall have until May 25, 2007 to file an 
appeal.
    2. Parties receiving service of the decision by certified mail 
shall have 30 days from the date of receipt to file an appeal.
    Parties who do not file an appeal in accordance with the 
requirements of 43 CFR Part 4, Subpart E, shall be deemed to have 
waived their rights.

ADDRESSES: A copy of the decision may be obtained from: Bureau of Land 
Management, Alaska State Office, 222 West Seventh Avenue, <greek-i>13, 
Anchorage, Alaska 99513-7599.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The Bureau of Land Management by phone 
at 907-271-5960, or by e-mail at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#91f0fabff3fdfcbff2feffe7f4e8f0fff2f4d1f0fabff3fdfcbff6fee7"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="2a4b4104484647044945445c4f534b44494f6a4b4104484647044d455c">[email protected]</span></a>. Persons 
who use a telecommunication device (TTD) may call the Federal 
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8330, 24 hours a day, 
seven days a week, to contact the Bureau of Land Management.

D. Kay Erben,
Land Law Examiner, Branch of Adjudication II.
[FR Doc. E7-7880 Filed 4-24-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-$$-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-1580

BARBARA GROSHANS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

GORDON R. ENGLAND, SECRETARY, THE UNITED

STATES NAVY; NANCY DOWLING, In her individual

capacity; MELVIN REICHLING, In his individual

capacity; MAXANNE WITKIN, In her individual

capacity; DONALD FAULKNER, In his individual

capacity,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District

Judge. (CA-01-1438-A)

Submitted: October 7, 2002 Decided: December 3, 2002

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Barbara Groshans, Appellant Pro Se. Dennis Edward Szybala,

Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Barbara Groshans appeals the district court’s order dismissing

her civil action. We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Groshans v. England,

No. CA-01-1438-A (E.D. Va. filed Mar. 28, 2002; entered Mar. 29,

2002 & filed May 3, 2002; entered May 6, 2002). Groshans’ motion

to strike the Appellees’ brief is denied. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
# CE2004065EN.01010702.xml

| 13.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 65/107 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 65/107

---

(2004/C 65 E/119)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-1994/03

by Pietro-Paolo Mennea (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(10 June 2003)

Subject:   Television rights

Subject:

There are sports organisations in the Member States which are legal entities different from sports federations, to which they are affiliated, and concern themselves with organising televised sports events.

In paragraph 27of the report on sport adopted on 7 September 2000 (A5-0208/2000) the European Parliament ‘calls for television rights to be granted in compliance with the antitrust law and to companies which take responsibility for the risks involved in preparing the sporting event; calls also for transparency in the granting of television rights’.

The selling of television rights for sports events is an economic activity and should therefore be subject to Community law on competition.

On a number of occasions the European Union has stressed that television rights should belong to legal entities who take responsibility for the business risk, with all that entails, including the risk of failure.

In view of all this, can the Commission say how it intends to ensure and ascertain that the sale and granting of television rights for the broadcasting of sports events, especially light athletics events, comply with legislation on competition, and also ascertain that television rights are owned by sports associations which have taken on the task of organising the event, rather than sports federations which have not done so, and that the rights are granted in accordance with criteria of transparency?

Answer given by Mr Monti on behalf of the Commission

(10 July 2003)

(10 July 2003)

The Commission agrees with the Honourable Member that the selling of television rights of sports events is an economic activity, which is subject to Community competition law.

The sale of TV rights of light athletic events is therefore also in principle a matter, which could fall within the scope of Community competition law. However, regarding the issue raised, namely the problem concerning the ownership of TV rights by the sports associations which have taken the risk of organising the event, it must be noted that, according to Article 295 of the EC Treaty, Community law does not prejudice in any way the system of property ownership.

Furthermore, as regards the exercise of the TV rights of light athletics events and compliance with Community competition rules, the Commission has at present no ongoing procedures, either upon complaint or own initiative investigations, concerning specifically this sports discipline.

---
No. 39028.

#### Protests 939195-G, etc., of Jos. Riedel Glass Works, Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of *Rice*v. *United States*(T. D. 49373) the atomizers in question were held dutiable at 40 percent under paragraph 339 as claimed.
#### Mir Suau & Co., S. en C. *v.*United States

No. 7558.

Entry No. A-62.

Invoice dated Habana, Cuba, October 30, 1945.

Certified October 30, 1945.

Entered at Ponce, Puerto Rico, November 6, 1945.

*394(Decided March 4, 1948)

■ *Louis E. Dubon*for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

LawRence, Judge:

Submission of this appeal for reappraisement was made on written stipulation of counsel for the respective parties to the effect that the market value or price at the time of exportation of the merchandise involved herein, at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade for exportation to the United States, plus, when not included in such price, the cost of all containers of whatever nature, and all other costs, charges, and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States, is $12 per 100 Cuban pounds, net, packed. It was further stipulated by counsel for both parties that there was no higher foreign value for the merchandise herein at the time of exportation.

Upon the agreed facts, I find the export value of the involved merchandise to which this appeal relates, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for determining the value of said merchandise, and that such value is $12 per 100 Cuban pounds, net, packed.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 32.2



                             TRANS-INDUSTRIES, INC.


                    CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Trans-Industries, Inc.
(the "Company") for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Kai
Kosanke, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:


(1)     The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
        15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
        Company.





/s/ Kai Kosanke
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Name: Kai Kosanke
Title: Vice President, and Chief Financial Officer
Date: August 14, 2003




This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Paragraph 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

See also the certification pursuant to Sec. 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, which is also attached to this Report.
340000m.£ |

BATHYMETRIC MAP

BERING SEA
CAPE MENDENHALL

4g0000m.£.

(97 quunivke Soak leespae

CAPE MENDENRALL) NoS-1
3 5

€850000m:N

\ 10

977

3640000m

LOND 3-1

7

END

‘Sia
oO
g
[CAPE :

fA

ge5p000m N.

6550000m.Y,

971

1047

1
340000m.6,

Bathymetry compiled by the National Ocean Service (NOS) from bathymetric Data other than
NOS Hydrographic surveys. This is a facsimile reproduction of the bathymetric manuscript and
does not necessarily represent the final published form. This information is not intended for
navigational purposes. .

Bathymetric Contour Intervals: 10 meters to maximum depth, supplemented by 2 meter intervals.
Datum: Mean Lower Low Water (MLLW). .

Universal Transverse Mercator Grid. Zone 3; 10,000 meter ticks (--) are shown inside the
neatline.

Protraction Diagram data shown in a subdued (screened) black was compiled by the Minerals
Management Service (MMS).

THIS MAP IS NOT A LEGAL DOCUMENT for Federal leasing purposes; for such purposes
use the MMS Outer Continental Shelf Official Protraction Diagrams.

Heavy line(s} indicate limits of these protraction diagrams.

EVALUATION OF

BATHYMETRIC DATA

Bathymetry compiled by’the Na

Random Tracklines and Bathymetric Surveys dated 1944 to 1980.

The Bathymetric Data ranges in

1:1,000,000 with a minimum line spacing of 3.0 and a maximum

tional Ocean Service from

‘scale from 1:500,000 to

line spacing of 15.0 nautical miles.

Data corrected for sound velocit
Correction Tables, 1980.

'y according to Echo-Sounding

OUTER, CONTINENTAL SHELF RESOURCE MANAGEMENT MAP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE .
NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION

NATIONAL OCEAN SERVICE

1989

Produced at Washington, D.C.

for

TRANSVERSE MERCATOR PROJECTION

Scale 1:250,000
10

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
MINERALS MANAGEMENT SERVICE

° 5 15 20 Statute Miles
5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Kilometers
° 5 10 15 Nautical Miles .
1

168°
60°

BATHYMETRIC DATA INDEX

165°
60°

Bathymetric data from sources other than

}OS hydrographic surveys.

59°

165°

agoooom.g,

CAPE MENDENHALL
NOS NO 3-1 (OCS):

INDEX TO ADJOINING SHEET
ae 162°

NUNIVAK ISLAND,
west NUNIVAK_ISLANI
NP 2-8 NP~3-7

men Gare

NDENHALL,
we
NO"2-2

KuskoKwim
BAY
NO'3-2

cape
MENDENHALL
NO 3-1

ST. Pau.
NORTH
NO 24

CAPE
NEWERHAM
WEST.
No 33

171s 162°

19
| sy Oo
; | D
gaggle S
sfsses
A2g/@ 6 5
7 e|g @ G
sh -le i Zz
Pgai8~ &
hae S|
. is m |
es |
ee

ey

1d 40 3903 NoLLISOd

= SWITSIAL NO J

-Qe0 “Ose rl

VINHOSIWS "SNIAY

+ HIV SIAL NO ANIA 40 39
Exhibit
      32




**UNISOURCE
      ENERGY CORPORATION**




**TUCSON
      ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY**




_____________________




**STATEMENTS
      OF CORPORATE OFFICERS**


(Pursuant
      to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)


_____________________





Each
      of the
      undersigned, James S. Pignatelli, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief
      Executive Officer of UniSource Energy Corporation and Tucson Electric Power
      Company (each a “Company”), and Kevin P. Larson, Vice President, Treasurer and
      Chief Financial Officer of each Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that each Company’s Quarterly Report on
      Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2006, fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended, and that the information contained therein fairly presents,
      in
      all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      such
      Company.







May
      5,
      2006


/s/   James
                  S. PignatelliJames
                  S.
                  Pignatelli
                Chairman
                  of
                  the Board, President and
                Chief
                  Executive Officer
                UniSource
                  Energy Corporation
                Tucson
                  Electric Power Company/s/    
                  Kevin P. LarsonKevin
                  P.
                  Larson
                Senior
                  Vice
                  President, Treasurer and
                Chief
                  Financial Officer
                UniSource
                  Energy Corporation
                Tucson
                  Electric Power Company
# Official Journal C 191/2018

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 191 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 615 June 2018 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 191

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 615 June 2018

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | Council |
| 2018/C 191/01 | The EU list of non-cooperative jurisdictions for tax purposes — Report by the Code of Conduct Group (Business taxation) suggesting amendments to the Annexes to the Council conclusions of 5 December 2017, including the de-listing of two jurisdictions | 1 |
| 2018/C 191/02 | Notice for the attention of certain persons and entities subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2014/145/CFSP and Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine | 4 |
| | European Commission |
| 2018/C 191/03 | Euro exchange rates | 5 |
| 2018/C 191/04 | Explanatory Notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union | 6 |
| 2018/C 191/05 | Explanatory Notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union | 6 |
| 2018/C 191/06 | Explanatory Notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union | 7 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

Council

2018/C 191/01

The EU list of non-cooperative jurisdictions for tax purposes — Report by the Code of Conduct Group (Business taxation) suggesting amendments to the Annexes to the Council conclusions of 5 December 2017, including the de-listing of two jurisdictions

1

2018/C 191/02

Notice for the attention of certain persons and entities subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2014/145/CFSP and Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine

4

European Commission

2018/C 191/03

Euro exchange rates

5

2018/C 191/04

Explanatory Notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union

6

2018/C 191/05

Explanatory Notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union

6

2018/C 191/06

Explanatory Notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union

7

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Exhibit
10.6


 


AMENDMENT
TO REVOLVING LOAN AND SECURITY AGREEMENT


 


This
Amendment (the “Amendment”) to the Revolving Loan and Security Agreement dated April 28, 2011, as amended on July
26, 2014 and October 31, 2017 (the “Agreement”) is entered into this 31st day of October 2020, by and between Vaxstar
LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Vaxstar”), and ValueSetters, Inc. (“ValueSetters”), a Utah corporation,
with reference to the following:


 


READINGS/RECITALS


 


A.    
     The Agreement contains a maturity date of October 31, 2020, and ValueSetters and Vaxstar
desire to extend the maturity date to a time in the future.


 


B.     
     Both parties seek to amend the Agreement.


 


NOW,
THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, of the mutual promises hereinafter set forth and for other good and valuable consideration,
the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:


 


Paragraph
9 (k) of the Agreement is amended to read:





“Maturity
Date” means January 31, 2021.


 


Paragraph
1. (d) (i) of the Agreement is amended to read:





Subject
to Section 7(b)(ii), the principal amount outstanding under the Loan Advances shall accrue interest from the date of this Amendment
until the Maturity Date at the rate of eight percent (8%) per annum, compounding daily. Interest is not due until the Maturity
Date.


 


COUNTERPARTS:
This Amendment may be executed simultaneously in one or more counterparts, each of which when executed and delivered shall be
deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute a single agreement.


 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have entered into this Amendment as of the date written above.


 


	Vaxstar LLC 	 
	 	 	 
	Signature:		 
	 	Cecilia
    Lenk, Manager	 
	 	 	 
	ValueSetters, Inc	 
	 	 	 
	Signature:		 
	 	Coreen
    Kraysler, CFO
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 981/2006

of 29 June 2006         

fixing the maximum export refund for white sugar to certain third countries for the 31st partial invitation to tender issued within the framework of the standing invitation to tender provided for in Regulation (EC) No 1138/2005

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001 of 19 June 2001 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector (1) and in particular the second indent of Article 27(5) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For the 31st partial invitation to tender for white sugar issued pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1138/2005 the maximum amount of the export refund shall be 29,877 EUR/100 kg.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 30 June 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 29 June 2006.

For the Commission

J. L. DEMARTY            

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

----

(1)OJ L 178, 30.6.2001, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 39/2004 (OJ L 6, 10.1.2004, p. 16).

(2)OJ L 185, 16.7.2005, p. 3.

----