alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 602 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 602

     Memorializing and honoring the contributions of Byron Nelson.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

           September 30 (legislative day, September 29), 2006

 Mrs. Hutchison (for herself, Mr. Cornyn, Mr. Dorgan, and Mr. Stevens) 
submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 
                            on the Judiciary

                           November 16, 2006

             Committee discharged; considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

     Memorializing and honoring the contributions of Byron Nelson.

Whereas Byron Nelson was born on a cotton farm in Ellis County, near Waxahachie, 
        Texas, on February 4, 1912;
Whereas Byron Nelson became a caddie and taught himself the game of golf at Glen 
        Garden Country Club in Fort Worth, Texas in 1922;
Whereas Byron Nelson became a professional golfer in 1932 and won 54 PGA-
        sanctioned tournaments;
Whereas Byron Nelson is widely credited as being the father of the modern swing;
Whereas, in the 1945 professional season, Byron Nelson won a 1-season record of 
        18 tournaments and averaged 68.33 strokes;
Whereas, in the 1945 professional season, Byron Nelson won a record 11 straight 
        tournaments;
Whereas Byron Nelson was the winner of 5 major championships including the 1937 
        and 1945 Masters, the 1939 United States Open, and the 1940 and 1945 PGA 
        Championships;
Whereas the Salesmanship Club of Dallas created the EDS Byron Nelson 
        Championship in 1968 and remains the only PGA Tour event named in honor 
        of a professional golfer;
Whereas the EDS Byron Nelson Championship has raised more than $94,000,000 for 
        the Salesmanship Club Youth and Family Centers and has raised more money 
        for charity than any other PGA Tour event;
Whereas Byron Nelson was elected as an inaugural inductee into the World Golf 
        Hall of Fame in 1974; and
Whereas Byron Nelson will be remembered for his kindness and dedication that 
        have won the respect and admiration of his peers, present-day players, 
        and fans of all ages: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate honors the life and legacy of Byron 
Nelson.
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-6237

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus MICHAEL ANTHONY BELL, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Aiken. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (1:91-cr-00189-CMC-2; 1:05-cv-03383-CMC) Submitted: May 16, 2006 Decided: May 23, 2006 Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael Anthony Bell, Appellant Pro Se. Leesa Washington, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Michael A. Bell seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying his motion to dismiss the indictment, which the district court construed as a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion, and granting in part and denying in part his motion for reconsideration. The orders are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Bell has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsDescription of the US Army small-scale 2-meter rotor test systemA small-scale powered rotor model was designed for use as a research tool in the exploratory testing of rotors and helicopter models. The model, which consists of a 29 hp rotor drive system, a four-blade fully articulated rotor, and a fuselage, was designed to be simple to operate and maintain in wind tunnels of moderate size and complexity. Two six-component strain-gauge balances are used to provide independent measurement of the rotor and fuselage aerodynamic loads. Commercially available standardized hardware and equipment were used to the maximum extent possible, and specialized parts were designed so that they could be fabricated by normal methods without using highly specialized tooling. The model was used in a hover test of three rotors having different planforms and in a forward flight investigation of a 21-percent-scale model of a U.S. Army scout helicopter equipped with a mast-mounted sight.Document ID19870008231Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsPhelps, Arthur E., III*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Berry, John D.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateFebruary 1, 1987Subject CategoryAerodynamicsReport/Patent NumberAD-A178047NASA-TM-87762L-16165AVSCOM-TM-86-B-4NAS 1.15:87762Accession Number87N17664Funding Number(s)PROJECT: DA PROJ. 1L1-61102-AH-45PROJECT: RTOP 505-61-51-10Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19870008231.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
III 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 547 

Recognizing and supporting the success of the Adoption and Safe Families 

Act of 1997 in increasing adoption, observing the efforts that the Act 

has spurred, including National Adoption Day and National Adoption 

Month, and encouraging citizens of the United States to consider adoption throughout the year. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

AUGUST 2, 2006 

Ms. LANDRIEU (for herself and Mr. CRAIG) submitted the following resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on Finance 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing and supporting the success of the Adoption and 

Safe Families Act of 1997 in increasing adoption, observing the efforts that the Act has spurred, including National Adoption Day and National Adoption Month, and 

encouraging citizens of the United States to consider 

adoption throughout the year. 

Whereas, since the passage of the Adoption and Safe Families Act of 1997 (42 U.S.C. 1305 note; Public Law 105– 

89), the number of children adopted from the foster care 

system has increased significantly, with approximately 

51,000 children adopted from the foster care system in 

fiscal year 2004 alone; 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
2 

•SRES 547 IS 

Whereas, despite that remarkable progress, approximately 

118,000 children in the foster care system of the United 

States are waiting to be adopted, and 49 percent of those 

children are at least 9 years old; 

Whereas adoptive families make an important difference in 

the lives of the children they adopt by providing a stable, 

nurturing environment for those children; 

Whereas National Adoption Day is a collective national effort 

to find permanent, loving families for children in the foster care system; 

Whereas both National Adoption Day and National Adoption 

Month occur in November; 

Whereas, in 2002, the Department of Health and Human 

Services launched a series of public service announcements promoting the adoption of children aged 8 and 

older; 

Whereas more than 6,000 children have been placed into 

adoptive homes since the Department of Health and 

Human Services launched www.adoptuskids.org, a national photo listing service for children awaiting adoption 

across the United States; 

Whereas, in 2005, judges, attorneys, adoption professionals, 

child welfare agencies, and child advocates in 45 States 

and the District of Columbia participated in 227 events 

in conjunction with National Adoption Day; and 

Whereas those events finalized the adoptions of more than 

3,300 children from the foster care system: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) recognizes and supports— 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
3 

•SRES 547 IS 

1 (A) the success of the Adoption and Safe 

2 Families Act of 1997 (42 U.S.C. 1305 note; 

3 Public Law 105–89) and the efforts that the 

4 Act has spurred; and 

5 (B) the goals and ideals of National Adop6 tion Day and National Adoption Month; and 

7 (2) encourages the citizens of the United States 

8 to consider adoption throughout the year. 

Æ 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LAURA IVETTE TOVAR

- CAMACHO,

Petitioner,

v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

Respondent. No. 11

- 70140 Agency No. A098

- 957

- 747

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Submitted March 10, 2015 ** Before: FARRIS, WARDLAW, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges. Laura Ivette Tovar

- Camacho , a native and citizen of Mexico , petitions for review of the Board of Immi gration Appea ls’ (“BIA”) order dismissing her appeal from an immigration jud ge’s (“IJ”) decision denying her application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

MAR 18 2015 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 11

- 70140

(“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings. Zehatye v. Gonzales , 453 F.3d 1182, 1184

- 85 (9th Cir. 2006). We deny in part and grant in part the petition for review, and we remand. Substantial evidence supports the agency’s de nial of CAT relief because Tovar

- Camacho failed to establish it is more likely than not that s he would be tortured by or with the consent or acquiescence of the government if returned to Mexico

. See Zheng v. Holder, 644 F.3d 829, 835

- 36 (9th Cir. 2011). I n denying Tovar

- Camacho’ s asylum and withholding of removal claims, the agency found she failed to establish the requisite nexus to a protected ground. When the IJ and BIA issued their decisions in this case , they did not have the benefit of this court’s decisions in Henriquez

- Rivas v. Holder , 707 F.3d 1081 (9th Cir. 2013) (en banc), Cordoba v. Holder , 726 F.3d 1106 (9th Cir. 2013), and Pirir

Boc v. Holder , 750 F.3d 1077 (9th Cir. 2014), or the BIA’s decisions in Matter of M

- E

- V

- G

- , 26 I. & N. Dec. 227 (BIA 2014), and Matter of W

- G

- R

- , 26 I. & N. Dec. 208 (BIA 2014). Thus, we remand Tovar

- Camacho ’s asylum and withholding of removal claims to determine the impact, if any, of these decisions. See INS v. Ventura , 537 U.S. 12, 16

- 18 (2002) (per curiam). In light of this remand, we do not reach Tovar

- Camacho ’s remaining challeng es to the agency’s denial of her asylum and withholding of removal claims.3 11

- 70140

The parties shall bear their own costs for this petition for re view. PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; GRANTED in part; REMANDED.
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Department of Corrections, :

State Correctional Institution : CASES CONSOLIDATED

at Frackville, :

Petitioner :

:

v. : No. 1203 C.D. 2020

:

Ralph E. Lynn :

(State Civil Service Commission), :

Respondent :

Governor's Office of Administration, :

Petitioner :

:

v. : No. 1286 C.D. 2020

:

Ralph E. Lynn :

(State Civil Service Commission), :

Respondent :

PER CURIAM O R D E R

NOW, March 31, 2022, upon consideration of Intervenor 

Governor’s Office of Administration’s application for reconsideration, and 

Respondent’s answer in response thereto, the application is denied.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 79 (Wednesday, April 25, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 20501]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-7830]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

    The Department of Commerce (DOC) will submit to the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) for clearance the following proposal for 
collection of information under provisions of the Paperwork Reduction 
Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).
    Agency: Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS).
    Title: International Import Certificate.
    Agency Form Number: BIS-645P.
    OMB Approval Number: 0694-0017.
    Type of Request: Regular submission.
    Burden: 91 hours.
    Average Time Per Response: 16 minutes.
    Number of Respondents: 340.
    Needs and Uses: The United States and several other countries have 
undertaken to increase the effectiveness of their respective controls 
over international trade in strategic commodities by means of an Import 
Certificate procedure. For the U.S. importer, this procedure provides 
that, where required by the exporting country with respect to a 
specific transaction, the importer certifies to the U.S. Government 
that he/she will import specific commodities into the United States and 
will not reexport such commodities except in accordance with the export 
control regulations of the United States. The U.S. Government, in turn, 
certifies that such representations have been made.
    Affected Public: Individuals or households, business or other for-
profit organizations, and not-for-profit institutions.
    Respondent's Obligation: Required to retain or obtain benefits.
    OMB Desk Officer: David Rostker, (202) 395-3897.
    Copies of the above information collection proposal can be obtained 
by calling or writing Diana Hynek, Departmental Paperwork Clearance 
Officer, (202) 482-0266, Department of Commerce, Room 6625, 14th and 
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230.
    Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information 
collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of this notice 
to David Rostker, OMB Desk Officer, e-mail address, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#befadfc8d7dae1ecd1cdcad5dbccfed1d3dc90dbd1ce90d9d1c8"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="90d4f1e6f9f4cfc2ffe3e4fbf5e2d0fffdf2bef5ffe0bef7ffe6">[email protected]</span></a>, or Fax number, (202) 395-7285.

    Dated: April 19, 2007.
Gwellnar Banks,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. E7-7830 Filed 4-24-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DT-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# C_2017144EN.01001101.xml

| 8.5.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 144/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.5.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 144/11

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 March 2017 — Viasat Broadcasting UK Ltd v European Commission, Kingdom of Denmark, TV2/Danmark A/S

(Case C-660/15 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - State aid - Article 107(1) TFEU - Article 106(2) TFEU - Measures taken by the Danish authorities in favour of the Danish public service broadcaster TV2/Danmark - Compensation for the costs involved in the performance of public service obligations - Decision declaring the aid compatible with the internal market))

(2017/C 144/14)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Appellants: Viasat Broadcasting UK Ltd (represented by: M. Honoré and S.E. Kalsmose-Hjelmborg, advokater)

Appellants:

Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: L. Grønfeldt and by L. Flynn and B. Stromsky, Agents), Kingdom of Denmark (represented by: C. Thorning, Agent, assisted by R. Holdgaard, advokat), TV2/Danmark A/S (represented by: O. Koktvedgaard, advokat)

Other parties to the proceedings:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders Viasat Broadcasting UK Ltd to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission and TV2/Danmark A/S; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Viasat Broadcasting UK Ltd to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission and TV2/Danmark A/S;

| 3. | Declares that the Kingdom of Denmark is to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Declares that the Kingdom of Denmark is to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 59, 15.2.2016.

1

---
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Corporate Trust Services**

  MAC R1204-010  9062 Old Annapolis Road  Columbia, MD 21045  Tel:  410 884 2000  Fax:  410 715 2380 |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

Wells Fargo CommercialMortgage Securities, Inc.

375 PARK AVE FL 2

Wells Fargo Securities, LLC

NEW YORK, New York 10152-0002

 

 

Re:            Annual Statement of Compliance for Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Securities,INC., Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2016-NXS5

 

 

Per the Pooling and ServicingAgreement dated as of February 1, 2016 (the "Agreement"), theundersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., asCertificate Administrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies asfollows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2016 (the "ReportingPeriod"):

 

(a) A review of Wells Fargo's activities duringthe Reporting Period and of its performance under the Agreement has been madeunder such officer's supervision; and

 

(b) To the best of such officer's knowledge, basedon such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of its obligations under theAgreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

February 27, 2017

 

 

/s/Brian Smith

BRIAN SMITH

Vice President

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll  go far |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------|
July 24, 1964

No. 17,801.

#### United States v Donald R. Daniels, SR, U. S. Navy (WC NCM 64-00424).

On consideration of the Petition for Grant of Review of the decision of the Board of Review in case No. WC NCM 64-00424 of the United States Navy it appearing that the staff legal officer, in his post-trial review, erroneously advised the supervisory authority that the maximum sentence for accused’s offense was bad conduct discharge, forfeiture of $73.34 per month for six months, and confinement at hard labor for six months, whereas the correct maximum punishment was *704bad conduct discharge, forfeiture of $73.34' per month for three months, and confinement at hard labor for three months, and the court-martial in fact adjudged a sentence extending to bad conduct discharge, forfeiture of $70.00 per month for three months, and confinement at hard labor for three months, it is, by the Court, this 24th day of July, 1964,

ORDERED:

That said Petition be, and the same is, hereby granted.

The decision of the Board of Review is reversed, and the record of trial is returned to The Judge Advocate General of the Navy. The Board of Review may reassess the sentence in order to purge the prejudicial effect of the error, or order a new post-trial review before the supervisory authority.
November 6 , 2014



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

PINNACLE PREMIER PRO PERTIES, INC. AND PI NNACLE REALTY

ADVISORS, INC

. , Appellant s

NO. 14

- 14

- 00194

- CV V.

GHISLAIN BRETON, CAT HERINE DENICOURT AND DAVID ANDREIS

, Appellee s

________________________________ This cause, an appeal from the order granting temporary injunction in favor of appellee s , Ghislain Breton, Catherine Denicourt and David Andreis, signed March 4, 2014, was heard on the transcript of the record. We have inspected the record and find the trial court erred in granting the order . We therefore order the temporary injunction order of the court below REVERSED a nd RENDER judgment denying appellees’ request for a temporary injunction.
We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by appellee s , Ghislain Breton, Catherine Denicourt and David Andreis.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
----

**EXHIBIT      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO **

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350, **

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO **

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | · | The                Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended                June 30,                2006, (the “Report”), which this certification accompanies, fully complies                with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities                Exchange                Act of 1934; and |
|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | · | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/                Bruce W. Marlow                   |
|------------------------------------------------------|
| Bruce                W. Marlow                       |
| President                and Chief Executive Officer |
| (Principal                Executive Officer)         |

| /s/                Steven P. Erwin                               |
|------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Steven                P. Erwin                                   |
| Senior                Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
| (Principal                Financial Officer)                     |

----