alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Important legal notice**

*|*

# 12006E273

**Treaty establishing the European Community (consolidated version) - Part Five - Institutions of the Community - TITLE II - Financial provisions - Article 273***Official Journal C 321 E , 29/12/2006 P. 0167 - 0168 Official Journal C 325 , 24/12/2002 P. 0143 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0290 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 224 , 31/08/1992 P. 0073 - Consolidated version (EEC Treaty - no official publication available)*

Article 273

If, at the beginning of a financial year, the budget has not yet been voted, a sum equivalent to not more than one twelfth of the budget appropriations for the preceding financial year may be spent each month in respect of any chapter or other subdivision of the budget in accordance with the provisions of the Regulations made pursuant to Article 279; this arrangement shall not, however, have the effect of placing at the disposal of the Commission appropriations in excess of one twelfth of those provided for in the draft budget in course of preparation.

The Council may, acting by a qualified majority, provided that the other conditions laid down in the first subparagraph are observed, authorise expenditure in excess of one twelfth.

If the decision relates to expenditure which does not necessarily result from this Treaty or from acts adopted in accordance therewith, the Council shall forward it immediately to the European Parliament; within 30 days the European Parliament, acting by a majority of its Members and three fifths of the votes cast, may adopt a different decision on the expenditure in excess of the one twelfth referred to in the first subparagraph. This part of the decision of the Council shall be suspended until the European Parliament has taken its decision. If within the said period the European Parliament has not taken a decision which differs from the decision of the Council, the latter shall be deemed to be finally adopted.

The decisions referred to in the second and third subparagraphs shall lay down the necessary measures relating to resources to ensure application of this Article.

--------------------------------------------------
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk August 6, 2009

p0720 

# Order

August 6, 2009

137881

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 137881 COA: 285465 Wayne CC: 91-011107-FC JAMES LEGRONE, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 21, 2008 order of the Court of Appeal s is considered, and it is DE NIED, because the defendant’s motion for relief from judgment is prohibited by MCR 6.502(G).
No. 45152.

#### Protest 23530-K of Bullocks, Inc. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with agreement of counsel that some of the merchandise consists of woven mufflers in chief value of rayon or other synthetic textile, not hemmed or hemstitched, and other items consist of woven mufflers in chief value of silk, hemmed or hemstitched, and that they are similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 42238, the mufflers were held dutiable as claimed.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO.: 2:13-cr-101

JUDGE SMITH

MAGISTRATE JUDGE KING

DANIEL L. TEMPLE, 

Defendant.

ORDER

On May 17, 2013, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), recommending that the Court accept Defendant Temple’s guilty plea to an

Information charging him with making threats against the President of the United States in violation

of 18 U.S.C. § 871(a). Defendant, represented by counsel, waived his right to appear on the matter

before a District Judge. The Magistrate Judge conducted the colloquy required by Rule 11 of the

Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. Defendant’s plea was knowing, voluntary, free from coercion,

and had a basis in fact. 

Defendant was specifically informed of his right to contest the Report and Recommendation

by filing any objections within 14 days of the issuance of the Report and Recommendation pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(B) and Rule 72(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Defendant did

not file any objections. 

Case: 2:13-cr-00101-GCS Doc #: 20 Filed: 06/12/13 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation and ACCEPTS

Defendant’s plea of guilty to the Information. Defendant is hereby adjudged guilty of making

threats against the President of the United States. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 /s/ George C. Smith 

GEORGE C. SMITH, JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

-2-

Case: 2:13-cr-00101-GCS Doc #: 20 Filed: 06/12/13 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
From: Brian Shrager <Shrager.Brian@epamail.epa.gov>

To: combustionsurvey <combustionsurvey@erg.com>

Date: 7/18/2011 10:01 AM

Subject: New version of last letter I sent you...

Attachments: Boiler MACT Letter.pdf

----- Forwarded by Brian Shrager/RTP/USEPA/US on 07/18/2011 10:01 AM

-----

From: Nancy Tujague <ntujague@anga.us>

To: Brian Shrager/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 07/18/2011 09:59 AM

Subject: RE: Letter of Reconsideration Boiler MACT

Dear Mr. Shrager,

Please us the attached letter. I accidentally sent you the incorrect

file (it was an unsigned version).

Many thanks,

Nancy Tujague

Nancy Tujague

America's Natural Gas Alliance

Coordinator, Legislative & Regulatory Affairs

202-789-1303

701 Eighth St. NW, Suite 800

Washington, DC 20001

-----Original Message-----

From: Nancy Tujague

Sent: Sunday, July 17, 2011 1:53 AM

To: shrager.brian@epa.gov

Subject: Letter of Reconsideration Boiler MACT

Dear Mr. Shrager,

Please find attached a letter of reconsideration for the Boiler MACT

rule from America's Natural Gas Alliance. Please let me know if you have

any questions.

Best,

Nancy

Nancy Tujague

Coordinator, Legislative and Regulatory Affairs America's Natural Gas

Alliance

701 Eighth Street, NW

Washington, DC 20001
(See attached file: Boiler MACT Letter.pdf)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>           5
<MULTIPLIER>        1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           5,257
<SECURITIES>                                 2,990,752
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,032,205
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             8,928,390
<PP&E>                                      80,182,829
<DEPRECIATION>                              28,293,331
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              65,421,721
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       10,623,058
<BONDS>                                     30,397,858
<COMMON>                                       178,430
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                  23,128,205
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                65,421,721
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             8,648,585
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,819,818
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                11,895
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,465,964
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,350,908
<INCOME-TAX>                                   503,986
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            846,922
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   846,922
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     4.96
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
|    |
|----|
|    |  |
| 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Lonestar Resources US Inc.; and |

|    |
|----|
|    |  |
| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |

|                   |
|-------------------|
|                   |  |  |  |  |
| May 14, 2020 |   |   |   | /s/ Jason N. Werth |
|              |   |   |   | Jason N. Werth |
|              |   |   |   | Chief Accounting Officer |
|              |   |   |   | (Principal Financial Officer) |
No. 49837.

#### Protest 79972-K of Tobacco Blending Corp. (Louisville).

Opinion by

Walker, J.

It appeared that drawback was denied for the reason that certificates of importation, required under article 1059, Customs Regulations of 1937, when merchandise was entered at a different port from that at which drawback is claimed, were not applied for prior to entry. When the case was called for trial the president of the plaintiff corporation stated reliance had been placed by it on the customs broker. However, no effort was made to establish what was done by the broker in connection therewith. On the record presented the protest was overruled.
III 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 431 

Designating May 11, 2006, as ‘‘Endangered Species Day’’, and encouraging 

the people of the United States to become educated about, and aware 

of, threats to species, success stories in species recovery, and the opportunity to promote species conservation worldwide. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 5, 2006 

Mrs. FEINSTEIN (for herself, Mr. CHAFEE, Mrs. CLINTON, Mr. CRAPO, Mr. 

BIDEN, Mr. BYRD, Mr. FEINGOLD, Mr. REED, Ms. CANTWELL, Mr. 

LEVIN, Mr. LIEBERMAN, Mr. DODD, and Ms. SNOWE) submitted the following resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating May 11, 2006, as ‘‘Endangered Species Day’’, 

and encouraging the people of the United States to become educated about, and aware of, threats to species, 

success stories in species recovery, and the opportunity 

to promote species conservation worldwide. 

Whereas in the United States and around the world, more 

than 1,000 species are officially designated as at risk of 

extinction and thousands more also face a heightened 

risk of extinction; 

Whereas the actual and potential benefits derived from many 

species have not yet been fully discovered and would be 

permanently lost if not for conservation efforts; 


cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 431 ATS

Whereas recovery efforts for species such as the whooping 

crane, Kirtland’s warbler, the peregrine falcon, the gray 

wolf, the gray whale, the grizzly bear, and others have resulted in great improvements in the viability of such species; 

Whereas saving a species requires a combination of sound research, careful coordination, and intensive management 

of conservation efforts, along with increased public 

awareness and education; 

Whereas two-thirds of endangered or threatened species reside on private lands; 

Whereas voluntary cooperative conservation programs have 

proven to be critical for habitat restoration and species 

recovery; and 

Whereas education and increasing public awareness are the 

first steps in effectively informing the public about endangered species and species restoration efforts: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates May 11, 2006, as ‘‘Endangered 

3 Species Day’’; and 

4 (2) encourages— 

5 (A) educational entities to spend at least 

6 30 minutes on Endangered Species Day teach7 ing and informing students about threats to, 

8 and the restoration of, endangered species 

9 around the world, including the essential role of 


cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
3 

•SRES 431 ATS

1 private landowners and private stewardship to 

2 the protection and recovery of species; 

3 (B) organizations, businesses, private land4 owners, and agencies with a shared interest in 

5 conserving endangered species to collaborate on 

6 educational information for use in schools; and 

7 (C) the people of the United States to ob8 serve the day with appropriate ceremonies and 

9 activities. 

Æ 


cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
No. 44208.

#### Protests 879755-G (A), etc., of American Straw Goods Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Brown, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of bodies, hoods, forms, or shapes similar to that the subject of *Cohn*v. *United States*(4 Cust. Ct. 166, C. D. 314). The protests were sustained accordingly.
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1656/2005

of 10 October 2005         

on the issue of import licences for high-quality fresh, chilled or frozen beef and veal

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1254/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in beef and veal (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 936/97 of 27 May 1997 opening and providing for the administration of tariff quotas for high-quality fresh, chilled and frozen beef and for frozen buffalo meat (2),

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

1.   All applications for import licences from 1 to 5 October 2005 for high-quality fresh, chilled or frozen beef and veal as referred to in Article 2(f) of Regulation (EC) No 936/97 shall be granted in full.

2.   Applications for licences may be submitted, in accordance with Article 5 of Regulation (EC) No 936/97, during the first five days of November 2005 for 4 278,497 t.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 11 October 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 10 October 2005.

For the Commission

J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ            

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

----

(1)OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 21. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 (OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 1).

(2)OJ L 137, 28.5.1997, p. 10. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1118/2004 (OJ L 217, 17.6.2004, p. 10).

----
### {In Archive} Re: McElmo modeling Scott Bohning to: neil. j .ryan 03/29/2005 12:09 PM Cc: Shaheerah Kelly, Laura Yannayon
From: Scott Bohning/R9/USEPA/US To: neil. j .ryan@exxonmobil.com, Cc: Shaheerah Kelly/R9/USEPA/US@EPA, Laura Yannayon/R9/USEPA/US@EPA Archive: This message is being viewed in an archive.
Neil - Thanks for your revised modeling of 3/28/05, which addresses the PSD increment as well as the NAAQS. I apologize for omitting reference to the increment in my earlier communications. As one of the air quality modelers at EPA Region 9, I reviewed your revised modeling inputs and outputs, and your summary, "McElmo Main Flare Dispersion Model Input Data and Summary Results" (file "Model Input Data and Summary Results

_ 3-28-05.doc"). I think you have used the SCREEN3 model appropriately and conservatively, and have arrived at correct conclusions about the flare's impacts. The results are well below the NAAQS, and are below the significant modeling concentrations ("Signficiant Impact Levels" or SILs). Since the impacts are insignficant, no cumulative PSD increment analysis is required. Your analysis is acceptable as the basis for the PSD application required under your Consent Decree. Good luck on this project, and don't hesitate to contact me if you need anything else. - Scott Bohning

=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+= Scott Bohning U.S. EPA Region 9, AIR-7 bohning.scott@epa.gov 415/947-4127 fax-3579
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 20
- 0 17 6 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. NATALIE AMANDA RICH ,

Defendant and Appellant
.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including February 3 , 202 1 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

December 28 2020

12/28/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0176
(Reap. Dec. *8969)*

Entry No. 4344, etc.

#### *F.*W. Woolworth Co. *v.*United States

(Decided August 22, 1957)

*Sharretts, Paley & Carter*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Chief Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement enumerated in schedule “A,” attached hereto and made a part hereof, relate to certain glass Christmas tree ornaments exported from the Western Zone of Germany, directly or indirectly, by Lauscher Glasindustrie or Siegfried Heinkelein and entered at New Orleans, La.

The cases have been submitted on a written stipulation, showing export value, as defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for appraisement of the articles in question, and *625establishing that such statutory value for this merchandise is in each case the appraised value, less the amount added under duress, packing included, and I so hold.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 79 (Wednesday, April 25, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 20577]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-7918]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 5782]


Determined Under Section 620(q) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 
1961, as Amended, and Section 512 of the Foreign Operations, Export 
Financing, and Related Programs Appropriations Act of 2006, as Carried 
Forward Under the Continuing Resolution (Pub. L. 110-5), as Amended, 
Relating to Assistance to the Republic of Somalia

    Pursuant to the authority vested in me by Section 620(q) of the 
Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, as amended (FAA), and Section 512 of 
the Foreign Operations, Export Financing, and Related Programs 
Appropriations Act, 2006 (FOAA), as carried forward under Continuing 
Resolution (Pub. L. 110-5), as amended, and by Executive Order 12163, 
as amended by Executive Order 13346, I hereby determine that assistance 
to the Republic of Somalia is in the national interest of the United 
States and thereby waive, with respect to that country, the application 
of Section 620(q) of the FAA and Section 512 of the FY 2006 FOAA, as 
carried forward under the Continuing Resolution (Pub. L. 110-5), as 
amended, and any similar provision in prior year FOAAs.
    This determination shall be reported to Congress and published in 
the Federal Register.

    Dated: March 12, 2007.
Condoleezza Rice,
Secretary of State, Department of State.
 [FR Doc. E7-7918 Filed 4-24-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-26-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 

          - [Docket No. RP06-569-000] 

Take notice that an informal settlement conference will be convened in this proceeding commencing at 9 a.m. (EST) on Thursday, May 3, 2007, at the offices of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, for the purpose of exploring the possible settlement of the above-referenced docket. 

Any party, as defined by 18 CFR 385.102(c), or any participant as defined by 18 CFR 385.102(b), is invited to attend. Persons wishing to become a party must move to intervene and receive intervenor status pursuant to the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 385.214). 

                    FERC conferences are accessible under section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. For accessibility accommodations please send an e-mail to                     *accessibility@ferc.gov*                     or call toll free 1-866-208-3372 (voice) or 202-208-1659 (TTY), or send a FAX to 202-208-2106 with the required accommodations.                 

                    For additional information, please contact Bill Collins at (202) 502-8248,                     *william.collins@ferc.gov*                     or Irene Szopo at (202) 502-8323,                     *irene.szopo@ferc.gov.*

Kimberly D. Bose, 

Secretary.

 [FR Doc. E7-7863 Filed 4-24-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P