alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 64289.

protests 41316-K, etc. (St. Louis).

#### Conrad, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Richardson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that • the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *R. C. Williams & Co., Inc.*(40 C.C.P.A. 130, C.A.D. 508), and *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C.D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
No. 43079.

#### Protests 900723-G, etc., of Wm. Pressner & Co. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of paperweights plated with silver similar to those the subject of *Woolworth*v. *United States*(26 C. C. P. A. 221, C. A. D. 20). The claim at 50 percent under paragraph 339 was therefore sustained.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

GREGORY L. LAVIN, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D17-3542

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed May 25, 2018. 

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P.

9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for 

Pasco County; Mary M. Handsel, Judge.

Gregory L. Lavin, pro se. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

VILLANTI, CRENSHAW, and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-6261

SYDNEY ALPHONSO WISDOM,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

JOSEPH P. SACCHET,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge.

(CA-03-2494-AW)

Submitted: October 29, 2004 Decided: November 4, 2004

Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Sydney Alphonso Wisdom, Appellant Pro Se. Ann Norman Bosse, OFFICE

OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Sydney Alphonso Wisdom seeks to appeal the district

court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.

§ 2254 (2000). The order is not appealable unless a circuit

justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue

absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional

right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this

standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that

his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive

procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or

wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack

v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676,

683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and

conclude that Wisdom has not made the requisite showing.

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
(logo) pwc

 

 

**Report of IndependentRegistered Public Accounting Firm**

 

To the Board of Directors, PNCFinancial Services Group, Inc.:

 

We have examined management’sassertion, included in the accompanying Report on Assessment of Compliance withRegulation AB Servicing Criteria, that Midland Loan Services, a division of PNCBank, National Association (“Midland” or the “Company”) complied with theservicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission'sRegulation AB for all transactions serviced on the *Enterprise!* LoanManagement System (the “Platform”), as of December 31, 2016 and for the yearthen ended, excluding criteria 1122(d)(1)(iii), 1122(d)(3)(i)(B),1122(d)(3)(i)(C), 1122(d)(3)(i)(D), 1122(d)(3)(ii), 1122(d)(3)(iii),1122(d)(3)(iv), and 1122(d)(4)(xv), which the Company has determined are notapplicable to the servicing activities performed by it with respect to thePlatform. Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with theservicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management'sassertion based on our examination.

 

Our examination was conductedin accordance with attestation standards of the Public Company AccountingOversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a testbasis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicingcriteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in thecircumstances. Our examination included testing of selected asset-backedtransactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing of selectedservicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether theCompany processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activitiesin compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our procedures werelimited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by theCompany during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were notdesigned to detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurredprior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances oramounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by thisreport. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for ouropinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on theCompany’s compliance with the servicing criteria.

 

In our opinion, management’sassertion that Midland complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteriaas of and for the year ended December 31, 2016 for the Platform is fairlystated, in all material respects.

 

 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

 

February 17, 2017

 

 

*PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP,1100 Walnut Street, Suite 1300, Kansas City, MO 64106*

*T: (816) 472 7921, F: (816)218 1890 www.pwc.com/us*
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 76 (Friday, April 20, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 19880]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-7596]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

Order No. 1510


Approval for Expansion of Subzone 208A, and of Expanded 
Manufacturing Authority, Pfizer Inc (Pharmaceutical Products), Groton, 
Connecticut

    Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of 
June 18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the Foreign-Trade 
Zones Board (the Board) adopts the following Order:
    Whereas, the New London Foreign Trade Zone Commission, grantee of 
FTZ 208, has requested authority on behalf of Pfizer Inc (Pfizer) to 
expand the subzone and scope of manufacturing authority at Subzone 208A 
at the Pfizer pharmaceutical manufacturing plant in Groton, Connecticut 
(FTZ Docket 31-2006, filed 7/20/06);
    Whereas, notice inviting public comment has been given in the 
Federal Register (71 FR 43107, 7/31/06); and,
    Whereas, the Board adopts the findings and recommendations of the 
examiner's report, and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and 
the Board's regulations are satisfied, and that approval of the 
application is in the public interest;
    Now, therefore, the Board hereby approves the expansion of the 
subzone and the scope of authority under zone procedures within Subzone 
208A for the manufacture of pharmaceutical products at the Pfizer Inc 
plant located in Groton, Connecticut, as described in the application 
and the Federal Register notice, subject to the FTZ Act and the Board's 
regulations, including Section 400.28.
    Signed at Washington, DC, this 10th day of April 2007.

David M. Spooner,
Assistant Secretary of CommerceFor Import Administration, Alternate 
Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board.
    Attest:
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-7596 Filed 4-19-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S
7 a finn |

BATHYMETRIC MAP

BEAUFORT SEA
CANADA BASIN

| “agoooom.

8090000m..y

GogoooOMN

8090000m.N

30900007.

Bathymetry compiled by the National Ocean Service (NOS) from Bathy-
metric Data other than NOS hydrographic surveys. This is a facsimile
reproduction of the bathymetric manuscript and does not necessarily
represent the final publication. This information is not intended for navi-
gational purposes. .

Bathymetric Contour Interval: 50 meters to maximum depth.

Datum: Mean Lower Low Water (MLLW).

Universal Transverse Mercator Grid. Zone 6; 10,000 meter ticks {---) are
shown inside the neatline.

Protraction Diagram data shown in a subdued (screened) black was com-
piled by the Minerals Management Service (MMS).

THIS MAP IS NOT A LEGAL DOCUMENT for Federal teasing purposes; for
such purposes use the MMS Outer Continental Shelf Official Protraction
Diagrams. ‘

Heavy lines(s) indicate limits of these protrdction diagrams.

EVALUATION OF BATHYMETRIC DATA

Bathymetry compiled by the National Ocean Service from
Random Tracklines and Bathymetric Surveys dated 1944 to 1974.
The Bathymetric Data ranges in scale from 1:500,000 to
1:1,000,000 with a minimum line spacing of 3,0'and a maximum
line spacing of 15.0 nautical miles.

Data corrected for sound velocity according to Echo-Sounding
Correction Tables, 1980.

OUTER CONTINENTAL SHELF RESOURCE MANAGEMENT MAP

UNITED. STATES DEPARTMENT OF. COMMERCE

NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION
NATIONAL OCEAN SERVICE

1986
Produced at Washington, D.C.

for

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
MINERALS MANAGEMENT SERVICE

TRANSVERSE MERCATOR PROJECTION

Scale 1:250,000
10

BATHYMETRIC DATA INDEX
147e

Bathymetric data from sources other than
'S hydrographic surveys

oe

150° 147°

20 Statute Miles

30 Kilometers

2 9 15
a i —
5 ° 5 10 15 20 25
a E i —
5 ° 5 10
a 15 Nautical Miles

[agoo00n

CANADA BASIN
_NOS NS 6-7 (OCS)

INDEX TO
ADJOINING SHEETS

7 144°,
Sn

BEAUFORT SEA |

74383

ca

MOA T cannon |
WEN | BRR

NS 5-8 NS'6-7

HARRISON
BAY.

BeecHey | FLaxmaN
BOINT ISLAND
NORTH NORTH NORTH
| NR 5.2 NR 6-1 NR 6-2
7 71°

153° ~ 14ae

|
|

¢

°

ol ese

DE
"

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. AF 07-0157 

# PILED

'Ed Smitfi CLERK OF THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF MONTANA IN THE MATTER OF A CORRECTION TO RULE 45 OF THE MONTANA RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE ) ) ) ORDER 

### JUL 31 

### 2012

An error has been brought to the Court's attention in M. R. Civ. P. 45(a)(2), as adopted effective October 1, 2011. IT IS ORDERED that M. R. Civ. P. 45(a)(2) is modified as shown below. Highlighted language is added to the rule; language strickenthrough is deleted from the rule:



### Issuedfrom Wlzich Court. I\. subpoena must (I\.) for attendance at ahearing ortrial, from the court for the districtwhere the hearing or trial is to be held; (B) for attendance at a deposition, from the court for the district where the deposition is to be taken; and (C) for the production orinspection, ifseparate from a subpoena commanding a person's attendance, from the court for the district \-"here the production or inspection is to be made.

The above changes to M. R. Civ. P. 45(a)(2), which reflect the longstanding practice in cases filed in Montana district courts, shall take effect immediately. The Clerk is directed to provide copies ofthis orderto each Clerkofthe DistrictCourt inthe State ofMontana; each DistrictJudge forthe State ofMontana; ToddEverts and Kevin Hayes at the Montana Legislative Services Division; the Montana Attorney General; the Directorofthe MontanaTrial Lawyers; the Directorofthe MontanaDefense Trial Lawyers; July 31 20122
# C_2008080EN.01000901.xml

| 1.4.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 80/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.4.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 80/9

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

31 March 2008

(2008/C 80/07)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,5812 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 157,37 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4568 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,7958 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,397 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5738 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 119,58 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,051 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,335 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 259,43 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6982 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,522 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,7268 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 32,582 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,0675 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,7334 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,6226 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 12,3075 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 2,0079 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,1819 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 566,97 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 12,8118 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 11,0874 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,269 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 570,76 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 5,0575 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 65,715 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 37,113 |
| THB | Thai baht | 49,784 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,7554 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,8983 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,5812

JPY

Japanese yen

157,37

DKK

Danish krone

7,4568

GBP

Pound sterling

0,7958

SEK

Swedish krona

9,397

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5738

ISK

Iceland króna

119,58

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,051

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,335

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

259,43

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6982

PLN

Polish zloty

3,522

RON

Romanian leu

3,7268

SKK

Slovak koruna

32,582

TRY

Turkish lira

2,0675

AUD

Australian dollar

1,7334

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,6226

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

12,3075

NZD

New Zealand dollar

2,0079

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,1819

KRW

South Korean won

1 566,97

ZAR

South African rand

12,8118

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

11,0874

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,269

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 570,76

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

5,0575

PHP

Philippine peso

65,715

RUB

Russian rouble

37,113

THB

Thai baht

49,784

BRL

Brazilian real

2,7554

MXN

Mexican peso

16,8983

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 78 (Tuesday, April 24, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 20390]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-7738]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

PRESIDIO TRUST


Notice of Public Meeting

AGENCY: The Presidio Trust.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with Sec.  103(c)(6) of the Presidio Trust Act, 
16 U.S.C. 460bb note, Title I of Pub. L. 104-333, 110 Stat. 4097, as 
amended, and in accordance with the Presidio Trust's bylaws, notice is 
hereby given that a public meeting of the Presidio Trust Board of 
Directors will be held commencing 6:30 p.m. on Thursday, May 10, 2007, 
at the Golden Gate Club, 135 Fisher Loop, Presidio of San Francisco, 
California. The Presidio Trust was created by Congress in 1996 to 
manage approximately eighty percent of the former U.S. Army base known 
as the Presidio, in San Francisco, California.
    The purposes of this meeting are to hear presentations from the 
finalists selected to submit proposals for the development of a 
Presidio Lodge, to adopt a Philanthropic Recognition Policy, to provide 
an Executive Director's report, and to receive public comment in 
accordance with the Trust's Public Outreach Policy.
    Individuals requiring special accommodation at this meeting, such 
as needing a sign language interpreter, should contact Mollie Matull at 
415.561.5300 prior to May 2, 2007.
    Times: The meeting will begin at 6:30 p.m. on Thursday, May 10, 
2007.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Golden Gate Club, 135 Fisher 
Loop, Presidio of San Francisco.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karen Cook, General Counsel, the 
Presidio Trust, 34 Graham Street, P.O. Box 29052, San Francisco, 
California 94129-0052, Telephone: 415.561.5300.

    Dated: April 18, 2007.
Karen A. Cook,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. E7-7738 Filed 4-23-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-4R-P
110 STAT. 3148 PUBLIC LAW 104–248—OCT. 9, 1996

Public Law 104–248

104th Congress

An Act

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to make certain technical corrections

relating to physicians’ services.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TECHNICAL CORRECTIONS RELATING TO PHYSICIANS’

SERVICES.

(a) CORRECTING REFERENCE TO UNIQUE IDENTIFIER SYSTEM.—

(1) IN GENERAL.—Section 1902(a) of the Social Security

Act (42 U.S.C. 1396a(a)) is amended, in the paragraph redesignated as paragraph (59) by section 13623(a)(6) of the Omnibus

Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993 and inserted by section

4752(c)(1)(C) of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1990,

by striking ‘‘subsection (v)’’ and inserting ‘‘subsection (x)’’.

(2) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by paragraph

(1) shall be effective as if included in the enactment of the

amendments made by section 4752(c)(1) of the Omnibus Budget

Reconciliation Act of 1990.

(b) CORRECTION IN MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS FOR BILLING FOR

PHYSICIANS’ SERVICES TO CHILDREN AND PREGNANT WOMEN.—

(1) IN GENERAL.—Section 1903(i) of the Social Security

Act (42 U.S.C. 1396b(i)) is amended, in the paragraph redesignated as paragraph (12) by section 13631(c)(3) of the Omnibus

Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993 and inserted by section

4752(a)(2)(B) of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of

1990—

(A) in subparagraph (A)(i), by inserting ‘‘or is certified

in family practice or pediatrics by the medical specialty

board recognized by the American Osteopathic Association’’

before the comma at the end;

(B) in subparagraph (B)(i), by inserting ‘‘or is certified

in family practice or obstetrics by the medical specialty

board recognized by the American Osteopathic Association’’

before the comma at the end; and

(C) in each of subparagraphs (A) and (B)—

(i) by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end of clause (v),

(ii) in clause (vi), by inserting ‘‘(or certified by

the State in accordance with policies of the Secretary)’’

after ‘‘Secretary’’,

(iii) by redesignating clause (vi) as clause (vii),

and

(iv) by inserting after clause (v) the following new

clause:

42 USC 1396a

note.

Oct. 9, 1996

[H.R. 1791]
PUBLIC LAW 104–248—OCT. 9, 1996 110 STAT. 3149

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 1791:

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 104–826 (Comm. on Commerce).

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 142 (1996):

Sept. 24, considered and passed House.

Sept. 27, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

‘‘(vi) delivers such services in the emergency

department of a hospital participating in the State

plan approved under this title, or’’.

(2) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by paragraph

(1) shall apply to physicians’ services furnished on or after

January 1, 1992.

Approved October 9, 1996.

42 USC 1396b

note.
Before the Third Division,

November 6, 1950

No. 54837.

#### Charles T. Wilson Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 130337-K (Laredo).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of dried onion powder the same in all material respects as that passed upon in *Charles T. Wilson Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(38 C. C. P. A. 19, C. A. D. 433), the claim at 25 percent under paragraph 781 was sustained.
```

[110th Congress Public Law 141]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ141.110]
Public Law 110-141
110th Congress

                                 An Act

 
  To exclude from gross income payments from the Hokie Spirit Memorial 
    Fund to the victims of the tragic event at Virginia Polytechnic 
  Institute & State University. <<NOTE: Dec. 19, 2007 -  [H.R. 4118]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. EXCLUSION FROM INCOME FOR PAYMENTS FROM THE HOKIE 
                              SPIRIT MEMORIAL FUND.

    For purposes of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, gross income 
shall not include any amount received from the Virginia Polytechnic 
Institute & State University, out of amounts transferred from the Hokie 
Spirit Memorial Fund established by the Virginia Tech Foundation, an 
organization organized and operated as described in section 501(c)(3) of 
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, if such amount is paid on account of 
the tragic event on April 16, 2007, at such university.
SEC. 2. <<NOTE: 26 USC 6698 note.>> MODIFICATION OF PENALTY FOR 
                    FAILURE TO FILE PARTNERSHIP RETURNS.

    For any return of a partnership required to be filed under section 
6031 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 for a taxable year beginning 
in 2008, the dollar amount in effect under section 6698(b)(1) of such 
Code shall be increased by $1.

    Approved December 19, 2007.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 4118:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 153 (2007):
            Dec. 4, considered and passed House.
            Dec. 6, considered and passed Senate.
WEEKLY COMPILATION OF PRESIDENTIAL DOCUMENTS, Vol. 43 (2007):
            Dec. 19, Presidential remarks.

                                  <all>
```
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

PHILLIP CAMILLO-AMISANO, 

Petitioner-Appellant, 

 v. 

FELICIA PONCE, Warden, 

Respondent-Appellee.

No. 21-55877 

D.C. No. 2:21-cv-00072-ODW-JDE 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Otis D. Wright II, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 10, 2023**

Before: S.R. THOMAS, McKEOWN, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Appellee’s motion to lift the stay in these proceedings is granted. The stay 

of this action, entered on November 22, 2022, is lifted.

Federal prisoner Phillip Camillo-Amisano appeals pro se from the district 

court’s judgment dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas petition. We have 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

OCT 17 2023

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 21-55877 

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. Reviewing de novo, see Pinson v. Carvajal, 

69 F.4th 1059, 1063 (9th Cir. 2023), we affirm.

Camillo-Amisano contends that the district court erred by concluding that 

his claim regarding the conditions of his confinement due to the COVID-19 

pandemic was not cognizable in a § 2241 habeas petition. Contrary to CamilloAmisano’s contention, the fact that he was seeking immediate release is 

insufficient to invoke habeas jurisdiction. See id. at 1072-73 (“[A] successful 

claim sounding in habeas necessarily results in release, but a claim seeking release 

does not necessarily sound in habeas.”). Rather, Camillo-Amisano needed to show 

that his detention is without legal authorization. See id. at 1070. Because he failed 

to do so, the district court properly dismissed his petition. See id. at 1073-75

(holding that the district court lacked jurisdiction over a § 2241 petition seeking 

release on the basis of prison conditions arising from the COVID-19 pandemic). 

The record demonstrates that the Department of Justice received and denied 

Camillo-Amisano’s request to be transferred to Canada, contradicting his

contention that prison officials intentionally interfered with his transfer request by 

taking no action on it.

AFFIRMED.