20158 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 77 / Monday, April 23, 2007 / Notices 

Application for Wife’s or Husband’s 

Insurance Benefits (SSA–2) 

SSA uses the information collected on 

Form SSA–2 to determine if an 

applicant (including a divorced 

applicant) can be entitled to benefits as 

the spouse of the worker and the 

amount of the spouse’s benefits. The 

respondents are applicants for wife’s or 

husband’s benefits, including those who 

are divorced. 

Approximately 700,000 respondents 

complete the SSA–2 annually. Of this 

total 95% (665,000) are completed 

through MCS and 50% of the MCS 

respondents will use Signature Proxy 

(332,500). The breakdown is displayed 

on the following chart: 

Collection method Number of 

respondents 

Estimated 

completion 

time 

(minutes) 

Burden hours 

MCS ............................................................................................................................................. 332,500 15 83,125 

MCS/Signature Proxy .................................................................................................................. 332,500 14 77,583 

Paper ........................................................................................................................................... 35,000 15 8,750 

Totals .................................................................................................................................... 700,000 ........................ 169,458 

Application for Disability Insurance 

Benefits (SSA–16) 

Form SSA–16–F6 obtains the 

information necessary to determine 

whether the provisions of the Act have 

been satisfied with respect to an 

applicant for disability benefits, and 

detects whether the applicant has 

dependents who would qualify for 

benefits on his or her earnings record. 

The information collected on form SSA–

16 helps to determine eligibility for 

Social Security disability benefits. The 

respondents are applicants for Social 

Security disability benefits. 

Approximately 1,513,677 respondents 

complete the SSA–16 annually. Of this 

total 97% (1,468,267) are completed 

through SSA’s Modernized Claims 

System (MCS) and 50% of the MCS 

respondents will use Signature Proxy 

(734,133.5). The breakdown is displayed 

on the following chart: 

Collection method Number of 

respondents 

Estimated 

completion 

time 

(minutes) 

Burden hours 

MCS ............................................................................................................................................. 734,134 20 244,711 

MCS/Signature Proxy .................................................................................................................. 734,133 19 232,476 

Paper ........................................................................................................................................... 45,410 20 15,137 

Totals .................................................................................................................................... 1,513,677 ........................ 492,324 

Dated: April 17, 2007. 

Elizabeth A. Davidson, 

Reports Clearance Officer, Social Security 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. E7–7649 Filed 4–20–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4191–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

[Public Notice 5781] 

Bureau of International Security and 

Nonproliferation; Imposition of 

Nonproliferation Measures Against 

Foreign Persons, Including a Ban on 

U.S. Government Procurement. 

AGENCY: Department of State. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: A determination has been 

made that fourteen foreign persons have 

engaged in activities that warrant the 

imposition of measures pursuant to 

Section 3 of the Iran and Syria 

Nonproliferation Act, which provides 

for penalties on foreign persons 

(including individuals, 

nongovernmental entities and 

organizations, governments and 

government entities) for the transfer to 

or acquisition from Iran since January 1, 

1999 or the transfer to or acquisition 

from Syria since January 1, 2005, of 

equipment and technology controlled 

under multilateral export control lists 

(Missile Technology Control Regime, 

Australia Group, Chemical Weapons 

Convention, Nuclear Suppliers Group, 

Wassenaar Arrangement) or otherwise 

having the potential to make a material 

contribution to the development of 

weapons of mass destruction (WMD) or 

cruise or ballistic missile systems. The 

latter category includes (a) items of the 

same kind as those on multilateral lists, 

but falling below the control list 

parameters, when it is determined that 

such items have the potential of making 

a material contribution to WMD or 

cruise or ballistic missile systems, (b) 

other items with the potential of making 

such a material contribution, when 

added through case-by-case decisions, 

and (c) items on U.S. national control 

lists for WMD/missile reasons that are 

not on multilateral lists. 

EFFECTIVE DATE: April 17, 2007. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: On 

general issues: Pamela K. Durham, 

Office of Missile Threat Reduction, 

Bureau of International Security and 

Nonproliferation, Department of State 

(202–647–4931). On U.S. Government 

procurement ban issues: Gladys Gines, 

Office of the Procurement Executive, 

Department of State (703–516–1691). 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant 

to Sections 2 and 3 of the Iran and Syria 

Nonproliferation Act (Pub. L. 109–112), 

the U.S. Government determined on 

April 10, 2007 that the measures 

authorized in Section 3 of the Act shall 

apply to the following foreign persons 

identified in the report submitted 

pursuant to Section 2(a) of the Act: 

China National Precision Machinery 

Import/Export Corporation (CPMIEC) 

(China) and any successor, sub-unit, or 

subsidiary thereof; 

Shanghai Non-Ferrous Metals Pudong 

Development Trade Co. Ltd. (China) and 

any successor, sub-unit, or subsidiary 

thereof; 

Zibo Chemet Equipment Company 

(China) and any successor, sub-unit, or 

subsidiary thereof; 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 77 / Monday, April 23, 2007 / Notices 20159 

Defense Industries Organization (DIO) 

(Iran) and any successor, sub-unit, or 

subsidiary thereof; 

Hizballah and any successor, subunit, or subsidiary thereof; 

Sokkia Singapore PTE Ltd. 

(Singapore) and any successor, sub-unit, 

or subsidiary thereof; 

Army Supply Bureau (Syria) and any 

successor, sub-unit, or subsidiary 

thereof; 

Syrian Air Force (Syria) and any 

successor, sub-unit, or subsidiary 

thereof; 

Syrian Navy (Syria) and any 

successor, sub-unit, or subsidiary 

thereof; 

Industrial Establishment of Defense 

(Syria) and any successor, sub-unit, or 

subsidiary thereof; 

Challenger Corporation (Malaysia) 

and any successor, sub-unit, or 

subsidiary thereof; 

Target Airfreight (Malaysia) and any 

successor, sub-unit, or subsidiary 

thereof; 

Aerospace Logistics Services (Mexico) 

and any successor, sub-unit, or 

subsidiary thereof; and 

Arif Durrani (Pakistan); 

Accordingly, pursuant to the 

provisions of the Act, the following 

measures are imposed on these persons: 

1. No department or agency of the 

United States Government may procure, 

or enter into any contract for the 

procurement of, any goods, technology, 

or services from these foreign persons; 

2. No department or agency of the 

United States Government may provide 

any assistance to the foreign persons, 

and these persons shall not be eligible 

to participate in any assistance program 

of the United States Government; 

3. No United States Government sales 

to the foreign persons of any item on the 

United States Munitions List (as in 

effect on August 8, 1995) are permitted, 

and all sales to these persons of any 

defense articles, defense services, or 

design and construction services under 

the Arms Export Control Act are 

terminated; and, 

4. No new individual licenses shall be 

granted for the transfer to these foreign 

persons of items the export of which is 

controlled under the Export 

Administration Act of 1979 or the 

Export Administration Regulations, and 

any existing such licenses are 

suspended. 

These measures shall be implemented 

by the responsible departments and 

agencies of the United States 

Government and will remain in place 

for two years from the effective date, 

except to the extent that the Secretary of 

State may subsequently determine 

otherwise. A new determination will be 

made in the event that circumstances 

change in such a manner as to warrant 

a change in the duration of sanctions. 

Dated: April 17, 2007. 

Patricia A. McNerney, 

Acting Assistant Secretary of State for 

International Security and Nonproliferation, 

Department of State. 

[FR Doc. E7–7660 Filed 4–20–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4710–25–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Noise Exposure Map Notice; Receipt of 

Noise Compatibility Program and 

Request for Review; HartsfieldJackson Atlanta International Airport, 

Atlanta, GA 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration, DOT. 

SUMMARY: The Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA) announces its 

determination that the Noise Exposure 

Maps submitted by the City of Atlanta 

for Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta 

International Airport under the 

provisions of 49 U.S.C. 47501 et. seq. 

(Aviation Safety and Noise Abatement 

Act) and 14 CFR part 150 are in 

compliance with applicable 

requirements. The FAA also announces 

that it is reviewing a proposed Noise 

Compatibility Program that was 

submitted for Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta 

International Airport under Part 150 in 

conjunction with the Noise Exposure 

Map, and that this program will be 

approved or disapproved on or before 

October 7, 2007. 

DATES: Effective Date: The effective date 

of the FAA’s determination on the Noise 

Exposure Maps and of the start of its 

review of the associated Noise 

Compatibility program is April 10, 2007. 

The public comment period ends June 

11, 2007. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Bonnie Baskin, Federal Aviation 

Administration, Atlanta Airports 

District Office, 1701 Columbia Avenue, 

Campus Building, Suite 2–260, College 

Park, Georgia 30337, 404–305–7152. 

Comments on the proposed Noise 

Compatibility Program should also be 

submitted to the above office. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This 

Notice announces that the FAA finds 

that the Noise Exposure Maps submitted 

for Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta 

International Airport are in compliance 

with applicable requirements of Part 

150, effective April 10, 2007. Further, 

FAA is reviewing a proposed Noise 

Compatibility Program for that Airport 

which will be approved or disapproved 

on or before October 7, 2007. This 

notice also announces the availability of 

this Program for public review and 

comment. 

Under 49 U.S.C., Section 47503 of the 

Aviation Safety and Noise Abatement 

Act, (the Act), and airport operator may 

submit to the FAA Noise Exposure 

Maps which meet applicable regulations 

and which depict non-compatible land 

uses as of the date of submission of such 

maps, a description of projected aircraft 

operations, and the ways in which such 

operations will affect such maps. The 

Act requires such maps to be developed 

in consultation with interested and 

affected parties in the local community, 

government agencies, and persons using 

the airport. 

An airport operator who has 

submitted Noise Exposure Maps that are 

found by FAA to be in compliance with 

the requirements of Part 150, 

promulgated pursuant to the Act, may 

submit a Noise Compatibility Program 

for FAA approval which sets forth the 

measures the operator has taken or 

proposes to take to reduce existing noncompatible uses and prevent the 

introduction of additional noncompatible uses. 

The City of Atlanta submitted to the 

FAA on March 29, 2007 Noise Exposure 

Maps, descriptions and other 

documentation that were produced 

during the Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta 

International Airport FAR Part 150 

Study Noise Exposure Maps Report 

conducted between October 9, 2006 and 

April 6, 2007. It was requested that the 

FAA review this material as the Noise 

Exposure Maps, as described in Section 

47503 of the Act, and that the noise 

mitigation measures, to be implemented 

jointly by the airport and surrounding 

communities, be approved as a Noise 

Compatibility Program under Section 

47504 of the Act. 

The FAA has completed its review of 

the Noise Exposure Maps and related 

descriptions submitted by the City of 

Atlanta. The specific documentation 

determined to constitute the Noise 

Exposure Maps includes: Map A—Noise 

Exposure Map: 2007; Map B—Noise 

Exposure Map: 2012; Table 3.1, Average 

Daily Operations—2007; Table 3.2, 

Aircraft Fleet Mix—2007; Table 3.3, 

Percent Runway Utilization by Time of 

Day7—2007; Table 3.4, Departure 

Headings—2007; Figure 3–2, NOMS 

Data—East Flow Tracks; Figure 3–3, 

NOMS Data—West Flow Tracks; Figure 

3–4, 2007 East Flow Corridors; Figure 

3–5, 2007 West Flow Corridors; Table 

3.5, Departure Stage Length: Air Carrier 

Aircraft—2007; Table 3.6, Nighttime 

Operations—2007; Table 3.8, Noise 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES