alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RAUL MORALES-IZQUIERDO, 

Petitioner, No. 03-70674

v. Agency No.  A79-166-816 ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney

General, ORDER

Respondent. 

Filed September 12, 2005

Before: Mary M. Schroeder, Chief Judge.

ORDER

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active

judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by

the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The threejudge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to

this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to

the extent adopted by the en banc court.

13267
PRINTED FOR

ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS

BY THOMSON/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO

The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted

© 2005 Thomson/West.
# C_2018005EN.01000301.xml

| 8.1.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 5/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.1.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 5/3

---

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 9 November 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Berlin (Germany)) — CTL Logistics GmbH v DB Netz AG

(Case C-489/15) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Rail transport - Directive 2001/14/EC - Infrastructure charges - Pricing - National regulatory body monitoring the conformity of those infrastructure charges with that directive - Contract for use of infrastructure concluded between a railway infrastructure manager and a railway undertaking - Principle of non-discrimination - Reimbursement of the charges without intervention by that body and outside the claims procedures involving it - National legislation enabling the civil courts to set a fair amount in the case of unfair charges))

(2018/C 005/03)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Landgericht Berlin (Germany)

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: CTL Logistics GmbH

Applicant:

Defendant: DB Netz AG

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The provisions of Directive 2001/14/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2001 on the allocation of railway infrastructure capacity and the levying of charges for the use of railway infrastructure, as amended by Directive 2004/49/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004, in particular Article 4(5) and Article 30(1), (3), (5) and (6) of that directive, as amended, must be interpreted as meaning that they preclude the application of national legislation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which provides for a review of the equity of charges for the use of railway infrastructure, on a case-by-case basis, by the ordinary courts and the possibility, if necessary, of amending the amount of those charges, independently of the monitoring carried out by the regulatory body provided for in Article 30 of Directive 2001/14, as amended by Directive 2004/49.

---

(1)  OJ C 406, 7.12.2015.

1

---
#### Edward Booth et al. *v.*United States

No. 7620.

Entry Nos. 733291; 728221; 714374.

— Invoices dated Birmingham, England, December 21,1945, etc.

Certified December 21, 1945, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., January 15, 1946, etc.

(Decided September 29, 1948)

*Benjamin A. Levett (Meyer Ohlbaum*of counsel) for the plaintiffs.

*David N. Edelstein,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Johnson, Judge:

This proceeding has been submitted upon a stipulation wherein the parties hereto have agreed that the issues involved in the reappraise-ments listed in schedule “A,” hereto attached and made a part hereof, are the same in all material repects as in the case of *United States*v. *Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp.,*33 C. C. P. A. 183, C. A. D. 334. The record in that case was admitted as part of the record herein.

In view of the aforesaid stipulation and accepting the same as a statement of fact, and in view of the decision cited, I find and hold that the export values of the merchandise are the values found by the appraiser, less any additions on entry by the importers by reason of advances by the appraiser in similar cases to equal the so-called British purchase tax.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
Exhibit 10.9


 


AMENDMENT NO.1 TO PROMISSORY NOTE


 


THIS AMENDMENT NO.1 TO
PROMISSORY NOTE (this “Agreement”), dated and effective as of January 27, 2022, by and between Chenghe Acquisition
Co., a Cayman Islands exempted company (the “Maker”) and Chenghe Investment Co., a Cayman Islands exempted company,
or its registered assigns or successors in interest (the “Payee”).


 


WHEREAS, the Maker executed
and delivered a Promissory Note dated as of April 8, 2021 to the Payee in the original principal amount of Three Hundred Thousand
Dollars (US$300,000) (the “Promissory Note”); and


 


WHEREAS, the Maker and the Payee desire to amend the Promissory
Note as set forth herein.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, for other good and valuable consideration,
the Maker and the Payee hereby agree as follows:


 


		1.	All capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the respective meanings set forth in the
Promissory Note.



 


		2.	Paragraph 1 of the Promissory Note is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:



 


Principal. The entire
unpaid principal balance of this Note shall be payable on the earlier of: (i) June 30, 2022 or (ii) the date on which the
Maker consummates an initial public offering of its securities (such earlier date, the “Maturity Date”). The principal
balance may be prepaid at any time. Under no circumstances shall any individual, including but not limited to any officer, director, employee
or shareholder of the Maker, be obligated personally for any obligations or liabilities of the Maker hereunder.


 


3.     Each
of the Maker and the Payee, by executing this Agreement, hereby waives all and any past default under or other non-compliance of the terms
of the Promissory Note which has occurred or may have occurred prior to the date hereof.


 


4.     Except
as specifically modified and amended herein, all other terms, conditions and covenants contained in the Promissory Note shall remain in
full force and effect.


 


		5.	This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the Maker and Payee and their respective
successors and assigns.



 


6.     THIS
AGREEMENT SHALL BE CONSTRUED AND ENFORCED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, WITHOUT REGARD TO CONLIFCT OF LAW PROVISIONS
THEREOF.


 












    	 	1	 



     


    

 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Maker, intending
to be legally bound hereby, has caused this Agreement to be duly executed by the undersigned as of the day and year first above written.


 


	 	CHENGHE ACQUISITION CO.
	 	a Cayman Islands exempted company
	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Qi Li
	 	 	Name:	 Qi Li
	 	 	Title:	Director



 





Acknowledged and agreed:


 


	CHENGHE INVESTMENT CO.	 	 
	 	 	 
	By:	/s/ Qi Li	 	 
	Name: 	Qi Li	 	 
	Title:	Director	 	 



 


[Signature Page to Promissory Note]


 






    	 	2
AFS-11-248-E April 22, 2011

Exemption No. 10179A Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2010-0947

Mr. Omer ErSelcuk

President/Chief Executive Officer Seaborne Virgin Islands, Inc., d.b.a. Seaborne Airlines 1210 Watergut Christianstead, VI 00820

Dear Mr. ErSelcuk:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption No. 10179. It explains the basis for our decision and describes its effect.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated March 31, 2011, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Adm inistration (FAA) on behalf of Seaborne Virgin Islands, Inc., d.b.a. Seaborne Airlines (Seaborne Airlines) for an extension of Exemption No. 10179. That exemption from § 121.173(b)(2) and appendix K, paragraph (5)(a), of part 121 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations allows Seaborne Airlines to continue to operate DHC-6-300 wheel-equipped airplanes after the December 20, 2010, effective date without making certain aircraft performance requirements.

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register because the requested extension of the exemption would not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Seaborne Airlines.2

Our Decision

The FAA has determ ined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 10179 remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the authority provided by 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has delegated to me, I grant your petition.

The Effect of Our Decision

Our decision extends the term ination date of Exemption No. 10179 to November 30, 2011, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

This letter must be attached to, and is a part of, Exemption No. 10179.

Sincerely,

/s/ Raymond Towles Acting Director, Flight Standards

Service
# C_2008076EN.01000101.xml

| 27.3.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 76/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 76/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

26 March 2008

(2008/C 76/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,5710 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 155,89 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4595 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,78810 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,3964 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5684 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 120,15 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,0475 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,595 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 256,94 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6967 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,5320 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,7175 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 32,633 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,9845 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,7043 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5949 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 12,2251 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,9455 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,1670 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 556,08 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 12,6712 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 11,0470 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,2598 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 437,49 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 5,0154 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 65,322 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 37,0320 |
| THB | Thai baht | 49,400 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,7166 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,7846 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,5710

JPY

Japanese yen

155,89

DKK

Danish krone

7,4595

GBP

Pound sterling

0,78810

SEK

Swedish krona

9,3964

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5684

ISK

Iceland króna

120,15

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,0475

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,595

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

256,94

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6967

PLN

Polish zloty

3,5320

RON

Romanian leu

3,7175

SKK

Slovak koruna

32,633

TRY

Turkish lira

1,9845

AUD

Australian dollar

1,7043

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5949

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

12,2251

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,9455

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,1670

KRW

South Korean won

1 556,08

ZAR

South African rand

12,6712

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

11,0470

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,2598

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 437,49

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

5,0154

PHP

Philippine peso

65,322

RUB

Russian rouble

37,0320

THB

Thai baht

49,400

BRL

Brazilian real

2,7166

MXN

Mexican peso

16,7846

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Union Tank Car Company (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
period ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kenneth P. Fischl, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In witness whereof, I have executed this certification as of the 11thday of August, 2006.



/s/ Kenneth P. FischlKenneth P. FischlPrincipal Executive Officer
(logo) C-III | C-III Asset Management

 

 

OFFICER’S CERTIFICATE

C-III Asset Management LLC

 

 

The undersigned, Kevin Donahue, President of C-III Asset Management LLC *(f/k/a Centerline Servicing LLC*), the Special Servicer under that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of December 1, 2015, relating to the **Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Trust 2015-G35, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2015-GC35** (the “Pooling and Servicing Agreement”), hereby certifies as follows:

 

1. a review of the activities of the Special Servicer and of its performance under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement during the calendar year 2015 (the “Reporting Period”) has been made under the undersigned’s supervision;

 

2. to the best of the undersigned’s knowledge, based on such review, the Special Servicer maintained an effective internal control system relating to its servicing of the Mortgage Loans serviced by it and has fulfilled in all material respects its obligations under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement throughout the Reporting Period.

 

Capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings given them in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement.

 

 

**IN WITNESS WHEREOF**, as of the 1st day of March, 2016, I have hereunto signed my name.

 

/s/ Kevin Donahue

**Kevin Donahue**, President

C-III Asset Management LLC, a

Delaware limited liability company

 

CGCMT 2015-GC35
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
COMPANY'S  FORM 10-Q FOR THE SIX MONTHS  ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                     6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                      DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                         JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                           JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                                   3,479,820
<SECURITIES>                                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                           10,745,381
<ALLOWANCES>                                               214,000
<INVENTORY>                                              1,273,077
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                        16,722,595
<PP&E>                                                  10,258,343
<DEPRECIATION>                                           3,700,419
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                          45,156,461
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    9,530,551
<BONDS>                                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                            0
<PREFERRED>                                                      0
<COMMON>                                                    24,694
<OTHER-SE>                                              34,101,216
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                            45,156,461
<SALES>                                                  2,148,087
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         9,914,336
<CGS>                                                    2,687,957
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            7,727,791
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                         131,970
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                          2,130,059
<INCOME-TAX>                                               289,240
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      1,840,819
<DISCONTINUED>                                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                  0
<CHANGES>                                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                             1,840,819
<EPS-BASIC>                                                   0.08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                 0.07


</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS

§ IN RE: No. 08

- 16

- 00300

- CV § DISH NETWORK, LLC, AND ECHOSPHERE, LLC, RELATORS. § § § AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

IN MANDAMUS

O R D E R Pending before the Court is a motion filed by the Real Party in Interest, Yvette Delgado, requesting that we modify the Court’s opinion and judgment to exceed the deadline for the trial court to rule on the motion to compel arbitration. The Court delayed ruling on this motion to modify pendi ng disposition of a subsequent original proceeding arising out of the same underlying case (our cause number 08

- 17

- 00161

- CV). We issued our opinion and judgment in cause number 08

- 17

- 00161

- CV conditionally granting mandamus relief on October 24, 2018. Th e disposition of cause number 08

- 17

- 00161

- CV effectively renders Delgado’s motion to modify motion moot. Accordingly, the motion to modify is denied as moot. IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 24TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2018. YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.
III 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 547 

Recognizing and supporting the success of the Adoption and Safe Families 

Act of 1997 in increasing adoption, observing the efforts that the Act 

has spurred, including National Adoption Day and National Adoption 

Month, and encouraging citizens of the United States to consider adoption throughout the year. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

AUGUST 2, 2006 

Ms. LANDRIEU (for herself and Mr. CRAIG) submitted the following resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on Finance 

NOVEMBER 16, 2006 

Committee discharged; considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing and supporting the success of the Adoption and 

Safe Families Act of 1997 in increasing adoption, observing the efforts that the Act has spurred, including National Adoption Day and National Adoption Month, and 

encouraging citizens of the United States to consider 

adoption throughout the year. 

Whereas, since the passage of the Adoption and Safe Families Act of 1997 (42 U.S.C. 1305 note; Public Law 105– 

89), the number of children adopted from the foster care 

system has increased significantly, with approximately 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 547 ATS 

51,000 children adopted from the foster care system in 

fiscal year 2004 alone; 

Whereas, despite that remarkable progress, approximately 

118,000 children in the foster care system of the United 

States are waiting to be adopted, and 49 percent of those 

children are at least 9 years old; 

Whereas adoptive families make an important difference in 

the lives of the children they adopt by providing a stable, 

nurturing environment for those children; 

Whereas National Adoption Day is a collective national effort 

to find permanent, loving families for children in the foster care system; 

Whereas both National Adoption Day and National Adoption 

Month occur in November; 

Whereas, in 2002, the Department of Health and Human 

Services launched a series of public service announcements promoting the adoption of children aged 8 and 

older; 

Whereas more than 6,000 children have been placed into 

adoptive homes since the Department of Health and 

Human Services launched www.adoptuskids.org, a national photo listing service for children awaiting adoption 

across the United States; 

Whereas, in 2005, judges, attorneys, adoption professionals, 

child welfare agencies, and child advocates in 45 States 

and the District of Columbia participated in 227 events 

in conjunction with National Adoption Day; and 

Whereas those events finalized the adoptions of more than 

3,300 children from the foster care system: Now, therefore, be it 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
3 

•SRES 547 ATS 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) recognizes and supports— 

3 (A) the success of the Adoption and Safe 

4 Families Act of 1997 (42 U.S.C. 1305 note; 

5 Public Law 105–89) and the efforts that the 

6 Act has spurred; and 

7 (B) the goals and ideals of National Adop8 tion Day and National Adoption Month; and 

9 (2) encourages the citizens of the United States 

10 to consider adoption throughout the year. 

Æ 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO.: 2:12-cr-81

JUDGE SMITH

MAGISTRATE JUDGE DEAVERS

ERIC ANTHONY WEAVER, 

Defendant.

ORDER

On May 3, 2012, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), recommending that the Court accept Defendant Weaver’s guilty plea to Count

One of the Information charging him with possession of a firearms, in and affecting interstate

commerce, by a convicted felon, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) and 924(a). Defendant,

represented by counsel, waived his right to appear on the matter before a District Judge. The

Magistrate Judge conducted the colloquy required by Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal

Procedure. Defendant’s plea was knowing, voluntary, free from coercion, and had a basis in fact. 

Defendant was specifically informed of his right to contest the Report and Recommendation

by filing any objections within 14 days of the issuance of the Report and Recommendation pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(B) and Rule 72(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Defendant did

not file any objections. 

Case: 2:12-cr-00081-GCS-NMK Doc #: 22 Filed: 05/31/12 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation and ACCEPTS

Defendant’s plea of guilty to Count One of the Information. Defendant is hereby adjudged guilty of

possession of firearms, in and affecting interstate commerce, by a convicted felon in violation of

18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) and 924(a).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 /s/ George C. Smith 

GEORGE C. SMITH, JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

-2-

Case: 2:12-cr-00081-GCS-NMK Doc #: 22 Filed: 05/31/12 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
# ELECTRONIC RECORD COA# 05-13-00627-CR OFFENSE: 19.02 Deon Reese Evans v. The State of 

## STYLE: Texas COUNTY: Dallas 

# \(o^-lH

COA DISPOSITION: AFFIRM TRIAL COURT: 291stJudicial District Court 

### DATE: 11/18/2014 Publish: NO TC CASE #: F-1228191-U



## IN THE COURTOF CRIMINALAPPEALS Deon Reese Evans v. The State of STYLE: Texas CCA#: 

# IbM-M A?PEllamt^S Petition 

## CCADisposition: DATE: FORDISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS: 

# ReFtJSifb JUDGE: 

# DATE: Ox/01(<2Ji<r JUDGE: V.fa UsiAi*^- SIGNED: PUBLISH: PC: DNP:

MOTION FOR REHEARING IN CCA IS: JUDGE: 

### ELECTRONIC RECORD