alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
,

ID

" N(]oYMU L.

-'f

[NITIAI.sIS'Q

C~_

ACTION: Final rule; request for corrunents.

SUMMARY: This document publishes in the Federal Register an

amendment adopting airworthiness directive CA6) 2009-15-16 that

was sent previously to all known U.S. owners ld operators of the

I

McDonnell Douglas airplanes identified above by individual notices.

This AD requires modifying the flight deck dO+- This AD is prompted

by a report indicating that certain equipment of the flight deck door is

defective. We are issuing this AD to prevent fllure of tins equipment,

DATES~ This AD becomes effective [INSERl DATE 5 DAYS AFTER

DATE OF PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER] to all persons

except those persons to whom it was made imlJediately effective by AD

2009-15-16, which contained the requirements bfthiS amendment.

which could jeopardize ,flight safety.

Federal Aviation Administration

[Docket No. FAA~2010·++++j Directorate Identifier 2

,,,,vi,,>]

009-NM-062-AD; Amendment 39-**; AD 11109-15-16]

R1N 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-9-1 0

I

Series Airplanes, DC-9-30 Series Airplanes, DO-9-81 (MD-81)

Airplanes, DC-9-82 (MD-82) Airplanes, DC-9j83 (MD-8J)

Airplanes, DC-9-87 (MD-87) Airplanes, MD-88 Airplanes, and

:MD-90-JO Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA),

Department of Transportation (DOT).

[4910-13-P)

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT AnON

14 CFR ParI 39
```

[110th Congress Public Law 129]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ129.110]

[[Page 121 STAT. 1357]]

Public Law 110-129
110th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
   1430 South Highway 29 in Cantonment, Florida, as the ``Charles H. 
 Hendrix Post Office Building''. <<NOTE: Nov. 30, 2007 -  [H.R. 3518]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. CHARLES H. HENDRIX POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 1430 South Highway 29 in Cantonment, Florida, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Charles H. Hendrix Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Charles H. 
Hendrix Post Office Building''.

    Approved November 30, 2007.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 3518:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 153 (2007):
            Oct. 9, considered and passed House.
            Nov. 16, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 617/2006

of 20 April 2006         

fixing the export refunds on syrups and certain other sugar products exported in the natural state

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001 of 19 June 2001 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector (1), and in particular the second subparagraph of Article 27(5) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The export refunds on the products listed in Article 1(1)(d), (f), (g) and (h) of Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001, exported in the natural state, shall be set out in the Annex hereto to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 21 April 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 20 April 2006.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 178, 30.6.2001, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 39/2004 (OJ L 6, 10.1.2004, p. 6).

(2)OJ L 214, 8.9.1995, p. 16.

(3)OJ L 178, 30.6.2001, p. 63.

----

ANNEX

EXPORT REFUNDS ON SYRUPS AND CERTAIN OTHER SUGAR PRODUCTS EXPORTED WITHOUT FURTHER PROCESSING APPLICABLE FROM 21 APRIL 2006 (1)

----

(1)  The amounts set out in this Annex are not applicable with effect from 1 February 2005 pusrsuant to Council Decision 2005/45/EC of 22 December 2004 concerning the conclusion and the provisional application of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation amending the Agreement between the European Economic Community and the Swiss Confederation of 22 July 1972 as regards the provisions applicable to processed agricultural products (OJ L 23, 26.1.2005, p. 17).

(1)  Applicable only to products referred to in Article 5 of Regulation (EC) No 2135/95.

(2)  Applicable only to products referred to in Article 6 of Regulation (EC) No 2135/95.

(3)  The basic amount is not applicable to syrups which are less than 85 % pure (Regulation (EC) No 2135/95). Sucrose content is determined in accordance with Article 3 of Regulation (EC) No 2135/95.

(4)  The basic amount is not applicable to the product defined under point 2 of the Annex to Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3513/92 (OJ L 355, 5.12.1992, p. 12).

----
RONALD GENE SHINGLER, JR.

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 17

- 0465

_____________________________/

Opinion filed May 1 , 2017.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Clay County

. Don H. Lester , Judge

.

Ronald Gene Shingler, Jr. , pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Bryan Jordan, Senior As sistant Attorney

General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS, C.J., MAKAR, and JAY, JJ., CONCUR.
PUBLIC LAW 104–214—OCT. 1, 1996 110 STAT. 3017

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 3120:

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 104–549 (Comm. on the Judiciary).

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 142 (1996):

May 7, considered and passed House.

Sept. 19, considered and passed Senate.

WEEKLY COMPILATION OF PRESIDENTIAL DOCUMENTS, Vol. 32 (1996):

Oct. 1, Presidential statement.

Æ

Public Law 104–214

104th Congress

An Act

To amend title 18, United States Code, with respect to witness retaliation, witness

tampering and jury tampering.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled, That title

18, United States Code, is amended—

(1) in section 1513—

(A) by redesignating subsection (c) as subsection

(d); and

(B) by adding at the end the following:

‘‘(c) If the retaliation occurred because of attendance at or

testimony in a criminal case, the maximum term of imprisonment

which may be imposed for the offense under this section shall

be the higher of that otherwise provided by law or the maximum

term that could have been imposed for any offense charged in

such case.’’;

(2) in section 1512, by adding at the end the following:

‘‘(i) If the offense under this section occurs in connection with

a trial of a criminal case, the maximum term of imprisonment

which may be imposed for the offense shall be the higher of that

otherwise provided by law or the maximum term that could have

been imposed for any offense charged in such case.’’; and

(3) in section 1503(a), by adding at the end the following:

‘‘If the offense under this section occurs in connection with

a trial of a criminal case, and the act in violation of this

section involves the threat of physical force or physical force,

the maximum term of imprisonment which may be imposed

for the offense shall be the higher of that otherwise provided

by law or the maximum term that could have been imposed

for any offense charged in such case.’’.

Approved October 1, 1996.

Oct. 1, 1996

[H.R. 3120]
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 480 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 480

   Expressing the sense of the Senate regarding the Chemical Weapons 
                              Convention.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 16, 2006

   Mr. Salazar (for himself, Mr. Allard, Mr. Bayh, Mr. Bunning, Mr. 
McConnell, and Mr. Wyden) submitted the following resolution; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Expressing the sense of the Senate regarding the Chemical Weapons 
                              Convention.

Whereas the Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production, 
        Stockpiling and Use of Chemical Weapons and on Their Destruction, done 
        at Paris on January 13, 1993 (commonly referred to as the ``Chemical 
        Weapons Convention''), requires all United States chemical weapons 
        stockpiles be destroyed by April 29, 2012;
Whereas, on April 10, 2006, the Department of Defense notified Congress that the 
        United States would not meet the deadline under the Chemical Weapons 
        Convention for destruction of United States chemical weapons stockpiles;
Whereas, destroying existing chemical weapons is a homeland security imperative, 
        an arms control priority, and required by United States law; and
Whereas, the elimination and nonproliferation of chemical weapons of mass 
        destruction is of utmost importance to the national security of the 
        United States: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that--
            (1) the United States is committed to making every effort 
        to safely dispose of its chemical weapons stockpiles by the 
        Chemical Weapons Convention deadline of April 29, 2012, or as 
        soon thereafter as possible, and will carry out all of its 
        other obligations under the Convention; and
            (2) the Secretary of Defense should prepare a comprehensive 
        schedule for safely destroying the United States chemical 
        weapons stockpiles to prevent further delays in the destruction 
        of such stockpiles, and the schedule should be submitted 
        annually to the congressional defense committees separately or 
        as part of another required report.
                                 <all>
```
1 

### Brown, Kelly

From: Sasser, Erika Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2014 6:58 PM To: Brown, Kelly Subject: FW: O3 NAAQS NPRM-- EPA Response to Interagency com ments under EO 12866/13563 Attachments: EPA Response to Interagency Request on Fires 11 25 14 1 pm.docx

Please post email and attachment(s) to Ozone NAAQS Rulemaking docket. Thanks

From: Sasser, Erika Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2014 1:55 PM To: 'Frey, Nathan J.' Subject: O3 NAAQS NPRM-- EPA Response to Interagency commen ts under EO 12866/13563

Nathan,

Attached are some edits EPA is proposing to respond to interagency comments on fires. Please let me kn ow if you have any questions about these materials.

Thanks, Erika
# C_2005333EN.01S00301.xml

| 29.12.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 333/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.12.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 333/s3

---

NOTICE

NOTICE

On 30 December 2005, in Official Journal of the European Union C 334 A, the ‘Common catalogue of agricultural plant species — Sixth supplement to the 23rd complete edition’ will be published.

Official Journal of the European Union

Subscribers to the Official Journal may obtain the same number of copies and language versions of this Official Journal as those to which they subscribe free of charge. They are requested to return the attached order form, duly completed and bearing their subscription registration number (code appearing on the left of each label and beginning with: O/...). This Official Journal will remain available free of charge for one year from the date of its publication.

Non-subscribers can order this Official Journal against payment from one of our sales offices (see overleaf).

This Official Journal — like all Official Journals (L, C, CA, CE) — can be consulted free of charge online at http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex.

Image

---
ex10_1.htm


     

    
      

      

    

    INDEPENDENT
AUDITORS' CONSENT

     

     

    May
10, 2007

     

    Board of Directors

    Exotocar

     

    I, Lawrence Scharfman, CPA provide my consent to
file the form 10-QSB which includes the financial statements for the period
ended March 31, 2007 that I have reviewed.

     

     

    /s/ Lawrence
Scharfman

    Lawrence Scharfman, CPA
----

Euro exchange rates (1)

11 December 2006

(2006/C 301/01)

1 euro= 

----

(1)

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

----
GLD-263 NOT PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

___________

No. 11-2748

___________

KORAN CAIN,

Appellant

v.

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WELFARE, OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY 

RECONSIDERATION UNIT; DEVON D. GRANT

____________________________________

On Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania

(D.C. Civil No. 11-cv-03960)

District Judge: Honorable Joel H. Slomsky

____________________________________

Submitted for Possible Summary Action 

Pursuant to Third Circuit LAR 27.4 and I.O.P. 10.6

August 11, 2011

Before: AMBRO, CHAGARES AND COWEN, Circuit Judges

(Opinion filed August 18, 201)

_________

OPINION

_________

PER CURIAM

In June 2011, Koran Cain file a complaint alleging that his constitutional rights 

were violated in 2006 when the Pennsylvania Department of Welfare and one of its 

employees “wrongfully adjudicated” his application for benefits. The District Court sua 
2

sponte dismissed the matter under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e), holding that Cain’s claims were 

barred by the applicable statute of limitations. Cain appealed.

We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and exercise plenary review 

over the dismissal of Cain’s claims. See Allah v. Seiverling, 229 F.3d 220, 223 (3d Cir. 

2000). The District Court did not err in dismissing the complaint under 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1915(e) for failure to state a claim on which relief can be granted because it was 

apparent from the face of the complaint that the claims were time-barred. If the 

allegations, taken as true, show that relief is barred by the applicable statute of 

limitations, a complaint is subject to dismissal for failure to state a claim. See Jones v. 

Bock, 549 U.S. 199, 215 (2007); see also, e.g., Bethel v. Jendoco Constr. Corp., 570 F.2d 

1168, 1174 (3d Cir. 1978). The running of the statute of limitations is an affirmative 

defense. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(c). Where that defense is obvious from the face of the 

complaint and no development of the record is necessary, however, a court may dismiss a 

time-barred complaint sua sponte under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) for failure to state a 

claim. See, e.g., Fogle v. Pierson, 435 F.3d 1252, 1258 (10th Cir. 2006).

When considering a civil rights claim, federal courts apply the relevant state’s 

statute of limitations for personal injury actions. Lake v. Arnold, 232 F.3d 360, 368 (3d 

Cir. 2000). For civil rights actions originating in Pennsylvania, a two-year statute of 

limitations applies. Id.; 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 5524. According to Cain, the events giving 

rise to his claims occurred in March 2006. Accordingly, Cain’s complaint, filed in June 

2011, was barred by the applicable statute of limitations. The District Court was entitled 
3

to reach the limitations question because it was obvious from the complaint and required 

no factual development. See Fogle, 435 F.3d at 1258. 

Accordingly, we will summarily affirm the District Court’s judgment.
The State of TexasAppellee/s

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 21, 2014

No. 04-14-00060-CR

John DONOHUE,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 187th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013CR3514

Honorable Raymond Angelini, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The State’s brief was originally due June 12, 2014; however, the court granted appellant 

an extension of time to file the brief until July 14, 2014. The State has filed a motion requesting 

an additional thirty days to file its brief.

We grant the motion and order the State to file its brief by August 13, 2014. Counsel is

advised that no further extensions of time will be granted absent a motion that (1) demonstrates 

extraordinary circumstances justifying further delay, (2) advises the court of the efforts counsel 

has expended in preparing the brief, and (3) provides the court reasonable assurance that the brief 

will be completed and filed by the requested extended deadline.

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 21st day of July, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
1 .5 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 KILOMETERS

SCALE 1:63 360

1 MAP INCH = 1 GROUND MILE

1 1/2 0 1 2 3 4 5 MILES

3000 0 3000 6000 9000 12000 15000 18000 21000 24000 27000 FEET

Landsat 7 ETM+ data acquired June, 2003

Universal Transverse Mercator projection, zone 5

1983 North American Datum ALASKA

MAP LOCATION

24 / 1 2

APPROXIMATE MEAN

DECLINATION, 2004 TRUE NORTH

MAGNETIC 

NORTH

o

153°00'W

153°00'W

152°30'W

152°30'W

152°00'W

152°00'W

151°30'W

151°30'W

151°00'W

151°00'W

70°10'N

70°10'N

70°20'N

70°20'N

70°30'N

70°00'N

ALPINE

FACILTY

NANUQ 5 

NUIQSUT

CD 4

CD 6

CD 5

COLVILLE RIVER CD2

CD 3

CD 7

INIGOK 1

EXPLANATION OF MAP SYMBOLS

Federal boundary of the National Petroleum Reserve in Alaska (NPRA)

Existing pipeline and infrastructure

Proposed pipeline route (approximate, as of May 2004)

Exploration well (locations from Alaska Department of Natural 

Resources, Division of Oil and Gas, May 2004)

Proposed production pad (approximate, as of May 2004)

ELEVATION

0

150 FEET

100

50

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT

Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for 

descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the 

U.S. Geological Survey

Printed on recycled paper

Sheet 1.—Color shaded-relief map

SHADED-RELIEF AND SURFACE-CLASSIFICATION MAPS OF THE FISH CREEK AREA, HARRISON BAY QUADRANGLE, NORTHERN ALASKA

By

John C. Mars,1 Christopher P. Garrity,1 David W. Houseknecht,1 Lee Amoroso,2 and Donald C. Meares3

2007

1U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA 20192, 2U.S. Geological Survey, Flagstaff, AZ 86001, 3U.S. Bureau of Land Management, Fairbanks, AK 99709

SCIENTIFIC INVESTIGATIONS MAP–2948

SHEET 1 OF 3

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

Prepared in cooperation with

U.S. BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT
# C_2016038EN.01001701.xml

| 1.2.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 38/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.2.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 38/17

---

Order of the Court (Second Chamber) of 29 September 2015 — ANKO AE Antiprosopeion, Emporiou kai Viomichanias v European Commission

(Case C-2/15 SA) (1)

1

((Application for authorisation to serve an attachment order on the Commission))

(2016/C 038/24)

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ANKO AE Antiprosopeion, Emporiou kai Viomichanias (represented by: S. Paliou, dikigoros)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: D. Triantafyllou and R. Lyal, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1) | The application is rejected. |
| --- | --- |

1)

The application is rejected.

| 2) | ANKO AE Antiprosopeion, Emporiou kai Viomichanias and the European Commission shall bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2)

ANKO AE Antiprosopeion, Emporiou kai Viomichanias and the European Commission shall bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 118, 13.4.2015.

1

---
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

August 6, 2009 

p0720 

Order 

 

August 6, 2009 

137881 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 137881 

 COA: 285465 

Wayne CC: 91-011107-FC 

JAMES LEGRONE, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 21, 2008 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant’s 

motion for relief from judgment is prohibited by MCR 6.502(G).
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsDetermination of spectroscopic properties of atmospheric molecules from high resolution vacuum ultraviolet cross section and wavelength measurementsProgress is given on work on: cross section measurements in the transmission window regions of the Schumann-Runge bands of oxygen; the determinations of predissociation linewidths; the theoretical calculation of band oscillator strengths of the Schumann-Runge absorption bands of O-16O-18; the determination of molecular spectroscopic constants; and the combined Herzberg continuum cross sections. The experimental investigations relevant to the cross section measurements, predissociation linewidths, and molecular spectroscopic constants are effected at high resolution with a 6.65 m scanning spectrometer which is, by virtue of its small instrumental width (FWHM = 0.0013 nm), suitable for cross section measurements of molecular bands with discrete rotational structure. Such measurements are needed for accurate calculations of the stratospheric production of atomic oxygen and heavy ozone formed following the photo-predissociation of O-16O-18 by solar radiation penetrating between the absorption lines of O-16(sub 2).Document ID19890004480Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsParkinson, W. H.*(Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory Cambridge, MA, United States)*Yoshino, K.*(Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory Cambridge, MA, United States)*Freeman, D. E.*(Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory Cambridge, MA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateNovember 1, 1988Subject CategoryGeophysicsReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.26:184601NASA-CR-184601Accession Number89N13851Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAG5-484Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19890004480.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024