2005 D e c i sion s O p inion s of the U nit e d S t at e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit 3-3-2005 

# Midgett e v . W al M ar t S t ores Inc P r e c e de n t i al or N on-P r e c e de n t i al : N on-P r e c e de nt i al D ocke t N o . 04-1244

F o l low thi s a nd a dd it ion al work s at : http://d i git alc ommon s .l a w . vi l l a nova . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2005

Thi s de c i sion i s br ou ght t o you for f r e e a nd ope n a c c e s s b y the O p inion s of the U nit e d S t at e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit at V i l l a no va U nive r sity S choo l of L a

w Di git al Reposit or y

. It h as be e n a c c ept e d for inclusion in 2005 D e c i sion s b y a n author i z e d a dmini s tr at or of V i l l a no va U nive r sity S choo l of L a

w Di git al Reposit or y

. F or mor e inform at ion, p le as e c ont a ct Be n j amin . C a rl s on@l a

w . vi l l a no va . e du . Re c omme nde d C it at ion
" Mid g e tt e v

. W al M ar t S t or e s Inc " (2005). 2005 D e cisio n s . P ape r 1482. http://d i git alc ommon s .l a

w . vi l l a nova . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2005/1482NOT P RE CE DE NT I AL UN I TED STATES CO UR T OF A PP EALS F O R T H E T H IR D C IR C U IT N o: 04- 1244 M A R S H A M ID G E T T E , A ppel l ant
v. W A L -M A R T S T O R E S , IN C ., A p p ea l from the U n it ed S tat es D istri ct C o u rt f o r th e E a ste rn D istric t o f P e n n sy lv a n ia ( N o. 01- C V
- 04277) D i s t r i ctC our t : H on. Fr ankl i n V an A nt w erpen Subm i t t ed Pur s uantt o T hi r d C i r cui tL A R 34. 1( a)

J anuary20, 2005 B efore: A L ITO , M cK E E and S M ITH , C i rcui tJudg es.

( Fi l ed: M ar ch 3, 2005) OP I NI ON P E R C UR I AM M ar s ha M i dget t e appe al s t he di s t r i ctcour t ’ s gr antof s um m aryj udgm enti n favor of W al
- M ar tSt or es , I nc. , herfor m erempl oy er . M i dget t e w as s ever el yi nj ur ed w hen her hus band s hotheri ns i de the def endant ’ s Pot t s t ow n, Penns y l vani a, s t or e af t erhe had p u rc h a se d a m m u n iti o n th e re . T h e re a f ter , M id g e tte f

iled th is d iv e rsitya c tio n a g a in st W a lM a r tS t o r e s , I n c . , a l l e g i n g v a r i o u s g r o u n d s o f r e c o v e r yu n d e rs t a t e l a w.O u r r e v ie w o f th e d is tr ic t c o u rt ’s g ra n t o f s u m m a ry ju d g m e n t is p le n a ry. H uang v. B P A m oco C or

p. , 2 7 1 F . 3 d 5 6 0 , 5 6 4 (3rd C ir
. 2 0 0 1 ). I nas m uch as t he di s t r i ctcour thas al r eadys etfor t h t he fa ctual and pr ocedur al h is to ry o f

th is c a s e , it is n o t n e c e s s a ry to re p e a t th a t h is to ry h e re . S e e Mid g e tte v . W

a lMar tSt or es , I

nc. , 3 1 7 F . S u p p . 2 d 5 5 0 (E .D . P a . 2 0 0 4 ). M o re o v e r, th e d istric t co u rt, i n its M emora ndum and O r der , has car eful l yand thor oughl yexpl ai ned i t s r eas ons fordeny i ng M i dget t e the r el i ef s he s eeks and gr ant i ng s um m aryj udgm entt o t he def endant s . W e nee d
n o t en g a g e in a re d u n d a n t an a ly sis sim p lyto re a c h th e sa m e re su lt. A c c o rd in g ly , w e w ill a f f irm th e d istric t co u rt su b sta n tiallyf o r th e re a so n s s e t f

o rth i n t he di s t r i ctcour t ’ s M emora ndum w i t houtfur t herel abor at i on.