alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Jim Szabo DBA Sancap Aerial

1119 Periwinkle Way Unit 50

Sanibel, Florida, 33957 

970-819-3379

jimandsue60@gmail.com

December 21, 2015 

To: U.S. Department of Transportation Docket Management 

System 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE Washington, D.C. 20590 

To whom it may concern, I would like to amend my petition (ID: FAA-2015-4730-0001)

and add aircraft to my fleet. I would like to add 3 DJI products including DJI Inspire 1, 

Dji Phantom 3 Professional and DJI Phantom 3 Advanced.

Sincerely yours,

James R szabo
(Reap. Dec. 9365)

#### Globe Shipping Co., Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 804652.

(Decided March 25, 1959)

Plaintiff not represented by counsel.

*George Cochran Goub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Lawrence, Judge:

When the above-enumerated appeal for a re-appraisement was called for hearing, there was no appearance on behalf of plaintiff and the case was ordered submitted by the court.

Rule 5(a) of the rules of the court provides that—

> The submission for decision of any case shall be made in open court by the parties thereto or their attorneys, or by stipulation, or by written request to the court, or by the court on its own motion. Where the plaintiff, petitioner, or appellant, or his attorney, in a case does not appear when the same is called, and after the opposite party has had opportunity to present evidence on the issues, it may be deemed submitted and may be decided by the court on the record as it appears therein.

Accordingly, I have examined the record in the appeal before the court and find nothing therein which tends in any way to overcome the presumption of correctness which attaches to the decision of the appraiser. I find and hold, therefore, that the proper value of the pierchandise is the value returned by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
No. 40354.

#### Protests 311568-G, etc., of Lord & Taylor (New York).

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of calendars, jars, pots, bottles, atomizers, boxes, and candlesticks chiefly used in, the household for utilitarian purposes or hollow ware. The claim at 40 percent under paragraph 339 was therefore sustained. *United States*v. *Friedlaender*(21 C. C. P. A. 103, T. D. 46445), *Dow*v. *United States*(id. 282, T. D. 46816), and *Rice*v. *United States*(T. D. 49373) cited.
From: Davis, Carlos E. [Carlos.E.Davis@saint

- gobain.com]

Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2011 12:41 PM

To: Reeves, David

Cc: fairchild.susan@epa.gov; Hancy, Cindy Wang

Subject: RE: Cr+6 Emissions from Furnaces

Thank you David and ideally I should have a “furnace” differences response early next week as I am on

travel the remainder of this week.

Best Regards,

Carlos E. Davis

Manager

- Environment, Health and Safety

Western Region

Saint

- Gobain North America

913

- 544

- 8888 (Cell)

913

- 342

- 6624, ext 53571 (Office)

EHS Portal

From: Reeves, David [mailto:dwreeves@rti.org]

Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2011 8:05 AM

To: Davis, Carlos E.

Cc: fairchild.susan@epa.gov; Hancy, Cindy Wang

Subject: Cr+6 Emissions fr om Furnaces

Per our recent discussion, I wanted to follow up with a note related to the information on the Cr+6

emission estimates we are developing for our data sets for the CertainTeed facilities.

Based on the recent (November 2010) testing for the K2 furnace that was reported as part of the

voluntary ICR, we calculated ~513 lbs/yr of Cr+6 emissions. Using that same emission rate and the

production pull rate for K1, we then calculated ~320 lbs/yr of Cr+6 emissions for the K1 furnace

-- >

resulting in ~833 lbs of Cr+6 for the KC facility. We also looked at total chrome emissions and calculated

that the Cr+6/total Cr ratio is 91.5%.

None of the other furnaces at the Chowchilla or Athens facilities were tested as part of the ICR effort,

s o our usual default would be to use the same emission rate from the K2 test and calculate emissions

to be input to the data set we are preparing for all fiberglass mfg facilities.

We are seeking additional information on any differences between the K2 fu rnace and the K1, C1, A1,

A2 furnaces that would help us determine how to calculate/assign HAP metal emissions using the test

data we have. As we discussed yesterday, we have some test reports from 2005 and 2007 for the

Chowchilla and Athens facilities

– but they only have total Cr (nothing on Cr+6).We are also interested in any information on possible furnace controls, the associated costs, and what

types of HAP metal (Cr+6) reductions might be achieved. You mentioned having installed caustic

inje ction on another furnace for PM control and anything you can tell us about costs and Cr reductions

would be valuable.

We look forward to any information you can provide as we are needing to get a complete data set

over to EPA next week so the risk model ing can be completed.

Regards

-

Dave Reeves

RTI International

dwreeves@rti.org

(919) 316

- 3739
#### Jay Willfred Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States

No. 6705.

Entry No. 704489, etc.

Invoices dated Birmingham, England, July 1943, etc.

Certified July 1943, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., August 11, 1943, etc.

(Decided January 6, 1947)

*Siegel, Mandell & Davidson*for the plaintiffs.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Keefe, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule A, hereto-attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importers on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
# C_2016078EN.01001001.xml

| 29.2.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 78/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.2.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 78/10

---

Order of the President of the Court of 1 December 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Commissione Tributaria Provinciale di Catanzaro — Italy) — Esse Di Emme Costruzioni Srl v Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale della Calabria, Ministero della Giustizia — Dipartimento Affari di Giustizia, Ministero dell’Economia e delle Finanze

(Case C-59/15) (1)

1

(2016/C 078/11)

Language of the case: Italian

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 138, 27.4.2015.

1

---
Before the Third Division,

June 5, 1958

No. 62057.

#### United China & Glass Co. *v.*United States,

protest 316190-K/14979 (New Orleans).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel that the merchandise is not an entirety, that the tile portion consists of an article, *596composed wholly or in chief value of earthen tiles, other than pill tiles, and that the metal stand consists of an article of base metal, not plated with platinum, gold, or silver, the tile portion was held dutiable at *12%*percent under paragraph 202 (b), as modified, *supra,*and the metal stand was held dutiable at *22%*percent under paragraph 397, as modified, *supra.*Smce it was stipulated only that the tile with stand is used in the kitchen or household and not that the metal stand is chiefly used in the home for the comfort and convenience of the household, the claim under paragraph 339, as modified, *supra,*was overruled, following *United States*v. *The Friedlaender Co., 21*C. C. P. A. 103, T. D. 46445, and *Frank P. Dow Co., Inc.*v. *United States,*id. 282, T. D. 46816.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 77 (Monday, April 23, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 20142]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-7622]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-61,261]


Missbrenner Prints, Inc.; Clifton, NJ; Notice of Termination of 
Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated on April 9, 2007 in response to a petition 
filed by a company official on behalf of workers of Missbrenner Prints, 
Inc., Clifton, New Jersey.
    The petitioning group of workers is covered by an earlier petition 
(TA-W-60,945) filed on February 12, 2007, that is the subject of an 
ongoing investigation for which a determination has not yet been 
issued.
    Further investigation in this case would serve no purpose. 
Therefore, the investigation under this petition has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 12th day of April, 2007.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
 [FR Doc. E7-7622 Filed 4-20-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 78 (Tuesday, April 24, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 20348]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-7786]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Partnering for Research: CAM Practitioners and Cancer Researchers 
Conference

AGENCY: National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health 
(NIH), Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).

ACTION: Notice; request for public comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the provisions of Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of 
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, for opportunity for public 
comments on proposed data collection projects, the National Institutes 
of Health (NIH), National Cancer Institute (NCI) will publish periodic 
summaries of proposed projects to be submitted to the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval.

DATES: The Partnering for Research: CAM Practitioners and Cancer 
Researchers Conference public comment period will run from May 1, 2007 
to June 1, 2007.

ADDRESSES: Comments may be submitted electronically at http://www.cancer.gov/cam.
    Background: Title: Partnering for Research: CAM Practitioners and 
Cancer Researchers Conference. Type of Information Collection Request: 
New. Need and Use of Information Collection: OCCAM has long recognized 
that successful cancer CAM research requires strong interdisciplinary 
partnerships between a practitioner of a specific unconventional 
therapy and researchers with experience and resources to perform 
prospective clinical cancer research. OCCAM will be hosting a two-day 
conference in an attempt to learn about the factors that influence 
functional and non-functional collaborations between these two groups 
of cancer CAM stakeholders. The information gathered in this public 
comment session will assist OCCAM in the development and planning of 
the aforementioned conference.
    Request for Comments: Written comments and/or suggestions from the 
public and affected agencies are invited on the following points: (a) 
Examples of both successful and unsuccessful research collaborations 
between CAM practitioners and researchers, and (b) Issues concerning 
research collaborations between CAM practitioners and researchers that 
should be addressed at the upcoming meeting.

    Dated: April 13, 2007.
Shea Buckman,
NCI OCCAM Communications and Outreach Manager, National Institutes of 
Health.
[FR Doc. E7-7786 Filed 4-23-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
April 18, 1944

No. 49376.

#### Protest 961673-G of Great Lakes Foundry Sand Co.

Government’s application for rehearing granted.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

EASTERN DIVISION 

TASHA K. RUDOLPH, 

 Case No. 2:13-cv-0057 

 Plaintiff, JUDGE GREGORY L. FROST 

 Magistrate Judge Kemp 

v. 

 

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, 

 Defendant. 

ORDER

 This action seeks review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security 

(“Commissioner”) denying Plaintiff’s application for supplemental security income. On October 

28, 2013, the United States Magistrate Judge recommended that Plaintiff’s statement of errors be 

overruled and that the Court enter judgment in favor of Defendant Commissioner. (ECF No. 18 

at PAGEID# 421.) Although the parties were advised of their right to object to the Magistrate 

Judge’s recommendation and of the consequences of their failure to do so (id. at PageID# 421-

22), there has been no objection to the Report and Recommendation filed by either party. 

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation. Noting that no objections have 

been filed and that the time for filing such objections has expired, the Court ADOPTS the 

Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 18), OVERRULES Plaintiff's Statement of Errors (ECF 

No. 10), and ORDERS that judgment be entered in favor of Defendant Commissioner. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 /s/ Gregory L. Frost 

 GREGORY L. FROST 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case: 2:13-cv-00057-GLF-TPK Doc #: 19 Filed: 11/20/13 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
No. 49852.

#### Protest 107613-K of Geilich Leather Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Walker, J.

An examination of the official papers disclosed that the entry was liquidated June 16, 1943, and protest filed August 19 of the same .year. The protest, being untimely, was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction in accordance with motion made by Government counsel.
No. 53185.

#### Alexanders et al. *v.*United States,

protests 948380-G, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
# C_2008329EN.01000801.xml

| 24.12.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 329/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.12.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 329/8

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

23 December 2008

(2008/C 329/06)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3978 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 126,03 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4540 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,94395 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,9555 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5175 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,7600 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 26,314 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 264,60 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7058 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,0960 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,9525 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 30,230 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,1257 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 2,0442 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,7041 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,8330 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 2,4471 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0180 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 896,67 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 13,5989 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,5728 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,2807 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 620,42 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,8511 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 66,330 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 39,6624 |
| THB | Thai baht | 48,357 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,3219 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 18,4300 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3978

JPY

Japanese yen

126,03

DKK

Danish krone

7,4540

GBP

Pound sterling

0,94395

SEK

Swedish krona

10,9555

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5175

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,7600

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

26,314

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

264,60

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7058

PLN

Polish zloty

4,0960

RON

Romanian leu

3,9525

SKK

Slovak koruna

30,230

TRY

Turkish lira

2,1257

AUD

Australian dollar

2,0442

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,7041

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,8330

NZD

New Zealand dollar

2,4471

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0180

KRW

South Korean won

1 896,67

ZAR

South African rand

13,5989

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,5728

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,2807

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 620,42

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,8511

PHP

Philippine peso

66,330

RUB

Russian rouble

39,6624

THB

Thai baht

48,357

BRL

Brazilian real

3,3219

MXN

Mexican peso

18,4300

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13

- 51209 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
HECTOR MOLINA

- RAMIREZ, also known as Hector M. Ramirez, also known as Hector Ramirez , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 2:11

- CR

- 460

- 1

Before CLEMENT, PRADO, and ELROD, Circuit Judges PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Hector Molina

Ramirez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Molina

- Ramirez h a s not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED August 29, 2014

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 13-51209 Document: 00512751672 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/29/2014No. 13

- 51209

therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appel late review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2.

2 Case: 13-51209 Document: 00512751672 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/29/2014
Before the First Division,

August 7, 1940

No. 44185.

#### Petitions 5915-R, etc., of *J.*L. Cox, agent Railway Express Agency, Inc. (Ogdensburg).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

The petitions were dismissed.
## MARY LAND DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT
1800 Washington Boulevard • Baltimore MD 21230

410-537-3000 • 1-800-633-6101 • www.mde.state.md.us

Robert M. Summers, Ph.D. Secretary

Kathy M. Kinsey Deputy Secretary artin O’Malley

overnor

nthony G. Brown

eutenant Governor M

G

A

Li



### Maryland Department of the Environment Notice of Public Hearing on Air Quality Plan

The Maryland Department of the Environment (MDE) gives notice of a Public Hearing concerning the revised 110 (a) (2) infrastructure SIP for th e 2008 lead (Pb) national ambient air quality

standard.

A public hearing will be held on:

December 5, 2012, at the Department of th e Environment, 1800 Washington Boulevard, Baltimore, Maryland 21230 – First Floor Conference Room – 10:00 AM

The Maryland Department of the Environment (MDE) will hold a public hearing, on the above State Implementation Plan (SIP) addressing implementation, ma intenance, and enforcement measures for the lead (Pb) national ambient air quality standard.

The public hearing will be held as required by federal law (Clean Air Act at 42 U.S.C. 7410 (a) and 40 CFR 51.102). After consideration of comments received, the plans will be finalized and submitted to the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to revise the State Implementation Plan required by the Clean

Air Act.

The proposed plan documents have been made availabl e on the Maryland Department of the Environment's

website at



### http://www.mde.state.md.us/programs/Air/AirQuali tyPlanning/Pages/programs/ airprograms/air_planni ng/index.aspx

NOTE: the public library systems in the region can be u sed for Internet access to view the documents.

Copies of the documents can be viewed at the Maryla nd Department of the Environment Office, Air and Radiation Management Administration, 1800 Washington Boulevard, Suite 730, Baltimore, Maryland - Contact: Jim Wilkinson or Sally Frampton

Comments may be presented at the hearing, mailed, emaile d, or faxed to Jim Wilkinson, Maryland Department of the Environment, Air and Radiation Management Administration,1800 Washington Boulevard, Baltimore, MD, 21230, Fax # 410-537-3202, or to jwilkinson@mde.state.md.us . The comments must be received before

close of business December 5, 2012

.

Persons in need of special accommodations should contact the Department's Office of Fair Practices at 410-537- 3964 at least five (5) business days in advance of the hearing. TTY users should contact the Department through the Maryland Relay Service at 410-537-4396.

Recycled Paper www. mde.state.md.us TTY Users 1-800-735-2258 Via Maryland Relay Service

### Page 2

Recycled Paper www.mde.state.md.us TTY Users 1-800-735-2258 Via Maryland Relay Service For more information contact Jim Wilkinson at (410) 537-3240 (Toll free in Maryland call (800) 633-6101 ext. 3240) or jwilkinson@mde.state.md.us

.



### Maryland Department of the Environment Air and Radiation Manage ment Administration 1800 Washington Boulevard, Ste. 730 Baltimore, Maryland 21230
# Official Journal L 165/2015

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 165 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5830 June 2015 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 165

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5830 June 2015

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Regulation (EU) 2015/995 of 8 June 2015 amending Decision 2012/757/EU concerning the technical specification for interoperability relating to the ‘operation and traffic management’ subsystem of the rail system in the European Union (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Regulation (EU) 2015/995 of 8 June 2015 amending Decision 2012/757/EU concerning the technical specification for interoperability relating to the ‘operation and traffic management’ subsystem of the rail system in the European Union (
  1
  )

1

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.