# Official Journal C 113/2010

| | ISSN 1725-2423
  doi:10.3000/17252423.C_2010.113.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 113 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 531 May 2010 |

ISSN 1725-2423

doi:10.3000/17252423.C_2010.113.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 113

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 531 May 2010

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | Court of Justice |
| 2010/C 113/01 | Last publication of the Court of Justice in the Official Journal of the European UnionOJ C 100, 17.4.2010 | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

Court of Justice

2010/C 113/01

Last publication of the Court of Justice in the Official Journal of the European UnionOJ C 100, 17.4.2010

Official Journal of the European Union

1

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | COURT PROCEEDINGS |
| | Court of Justice |
| 2010/C 113/02 | Case C-38/06: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 4 March 2010 — Commission of the European Communities v Portuguese Republic (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Duty-free imports of goods for specifically military use) | 2 |
| 2010/C 113/03 | Case C-424/07: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 3 December 2009 — European Commission v Federal Republic of Germany (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Electronic communications — Directive 2002/19/EC — Directive 2002/21/EC — Directive 2002/22/EC — Networks and services — National rules — New markets) | 3 |
| 2010/C 113/04 | Case C-518/07: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 9 March 2010 — European Commission v Federal Republic of Germany (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Directive 95/46/EC — Protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and the free movement of such data — Article 28(1) — National supervisory authorities — Independence — Administrative scrutiny of those authorities) | 3 |
| 2010/C 113/05 | Case C-135/08: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 2 March 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht (Germany)) — Janko Rottmann v Freistaat Bayern (Citizenship of the Union — Article 17 EC — Nationality of one Member State acquired by birth — Nationality of another Member State acquired by naturalisation — Loss of original nationality by reason of that naturalisation — Loss with retroactive effect of nationality acquired by naturalisation on account of deception practised in that acquisition — Statelessness leading to loss of the status of citizen of the Union) | 4 |
| 2010/C 113/06 | Joined Cases C-175/08, C-176/08, C-178/08 and C-179/08: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 2 March 2010 (references for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht — Germany) — Aydin Salahadin Abdulla (C-175/08), Kamil Hasan (C-176/08), Ahmed Adem, Hamrin Mosa Rashi (C-178/08), Dler Jamal (C-179/08) v Bundesrepublik Deutschland (Directive 2004/83/EC — Minimum standards for determining who qualifies for refugee status or for subsidiary protection status — Classification as a ‘refugee’ — Article 2(c) — Cessation of refugee status — Article 11 — Change of circumstances — Article 11(1)(e) — Refugee — Unfounded fear of persecution — Assessment — Article 11(2) — Revocation of refugee status — Proof — Article 14(2)) | 4 |
| 2010/C 113/07 | Case C-197/08: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 4 March 2010 — European Commission v French Republic (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Directive 95/59/EC — Taxes other than turnover taxes which affect the consumption of manufactured tobacco — Article 9(1) — Free determination, by manufacturers and importers, of the maximum retail selling prices of their products — National legislation imposing a minimum retail selling price for cigarettes — National legislation prohibiting the sale of tobacco products ‘at a promotional price which is contrary to public health objectives’ — Concept of ‘national systems of legislation regarding the control of price levels or the observance of imposed prices’ — Justification — Protection of public health — World Health Organisation Framework Convention on Tobacco Control) | 6 |
| 2010/C 113/08 | Case C-198/08: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 4 March 2010 — European Commission v Republic of Austria (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Directive 95/59/EC — Taxes other than turnover taxes which affect the consumption of manufactured tobacco — Article 9(1) — Free determination, by manufacturers and importers, of the maximum retail selling prices of their products — National legislation imposing a minimum retail selling price for cigarettes and a minimum retail selling price for fine-cut tobacco — Justification — Protection of public health — World Health Organisation Framework Convention on Tobacco Control) | 6 |
| 2010/C 113/09 | Case C-221/08: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 4 March 2010 — European Commission v Ireland (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Directive 95/59/EC — Taxes other than turnover taxes which affect the consumption of manufactured tobacco — Article 9(1) — Free determination, by manufacturers and importers, of the maximum retail selling prices of their products — National legislation imposing a minimum retail selling price for cigarettes — Justification — Protection of public health — World Health Organisation Framework Convention on Tobacco Control) | 7 |
| 2010/C 113/10 | Case C-241/08: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 4 March 2010 — European Commission v French Republic (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Directive 92/43/EEC — Article 6(2) and (3) — Incorrect transposition — Special areas of conservation — Significant effect of a project on the environment — ‘Non-disturbing’ nature of certain activities — Assessment of the effects on the environment) | 7 |
| 2010/C 113/11 | Case C-297/08: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 4 March 2010 — Commission of the European Communities v Italian Republic (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Environment — Directive 2006/12/EC — Articles 4 and 5 — Waste management — Management plan — Integrated and adequate network of disposal installations — Danger for human health or the environment — Force majeure — Civil disturbances — Organised crime) | 8 |
| 2010/C 113/12 | Case C-378/08: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 9 March 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale amministrativo regionale della Sicilia — Italy) — Raffinerie Mediterranee (ERG) SpA, Polimeri Europa SpA, Syndial SpA v Ministero dello Sviluppo economico, Ministero della Salute, Ministero Ambiente e Tutela del Territorio e del Mare, Ministero delle Infrastrutture, Ministero dei Trasporti, Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri, Ministero dell’Interno, Regione siciliana, Assessorato regionale Territorio ed Ambiente (Sicilia), Assessorato regionale Industria (Sicilia), Prefettura di Siracusa, Istituto superiore di Sanità, Commissario Delegato per Emergenza Rifiuti e Tutela Acque (Sicilia), Vice Commissario Delegato per Emergenza Rifiuti e Tutela Acque (Sicilia), Agenzia Protezione Ambiente e Servizi tecnici (APAT), Agenzia regionale Protezione Ambiente (ARPA Sicilia), Istituto centrale Ricerca scientifica e tecnologica applicata al Mare, Subcommissario per la Bonifica dei Siti contaminati, Provincia regionale di Siracusa, Consorzio ASI Sicilia orientale Zona Sud, Comune di Siracusa, Comune di Augusta, Comune di Melilli, Comune di Priolo Gargallo, Azienda Unità sanitaria locale No 8, Sviluppo Italia Aree Produttive SpA, Invitalia (Agenzia nazionale per l’attrazione degli investimenti e lo sviluppo d’impresa) SpA, formerly Sviluppo Italia SpA, (‘Polluter pays’ principle — Directive 2004/35/EC — Environmental liability — Applicability ratione temporis — Pollution occurring before the date laid down for implementation of that directive and continuing after that date — National legislation imposing liability on a number of undertakings for the costs of remedying the damage connected with such pollution — Requirement for fault or negligence — Requirement for a causal link — Public works contracts) | 8 |
| 2010/C 113/13 | Joined Cases C-379/08 and C-380/08: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 9 March 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale della Sicilia (Italy)) — Raffineri Mediterranee SpA (ERG) (C-379/08), Polimeri Europa SpA, Syndial SpA v Ministero dello Sviluppo economico, Ministero della Salute, Ministero Ambiente e Tutela del Territorio e del Mare, Ministero delle Infrastrutture, Ministero dei Trasporti, Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri, Ministero dell’Interno, Regione Siciliana, Assessorato regionale Territorio ed Ambiente (Sicilia), Assessorato regionale Industria (Sicilia), Prefettura di Siracusa, Istituto superiore di Sanità, Commissario Delegato per Emergenza Rifiuti e Tutela Acque (Sicilia), Vice Commissario Delegato per Emergenza Rifiuti e Tutela Acque (Sicilia), Agenzia Protezione Ambiente e Servizi tecnici (APAT), Agenzia regionale Protezione Ambiente (ARPA Sicilia), Istituto centrale Ricerca scientifica e tecnologica applicata al Mare, Subcommissario per la Bonifica dei Siti contaminati, Provincia regionale di Siracusa, Consorzio ASI Sicilia orientale Zona Sud, Comune di Siracusa, Comune di Augusta, Comune di Melilli, Comune di Priolo Gargallo, Azienda Unità sanitaria locale No 8, Sviluppo Italia Aree Produttive SpA, Invitalia (Agenzia nazionale per l’attrazione degli investimenti e lo sviluppo d’impresa) SpA, formerly Sviluppo Italia SpA, ENI SpA (C-380/08) v Ministero Ambiente e Tutela del Territorio e del Mare, Ministero dello Sviluppo economico, Ministero della Salute, Regione siciliana, Istituto superiore di Sanità, Agenzia per la Protezione dell’Ambiente e per i Servizi tecnici, Commissario delegato per l’Emergenza rifiuti e la Tutela delle Acque (‘Polluter pays’ principle — Directive 2004/35/EC — Environmental liability — Applicability ratione temporis — Pollution occurring before the date laid down for implementation of that directive and continuing after that date — Remedial measures — Duty to consult the undertakings concerned — Annexe II) | 10 |
| 2010/C 113/14 | Case C-384/08: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 11 March 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale amministrativo regionale del Lazio — Italy) — Attanasio Group Srl v Comune di Carbognano (Articles 43 EC and 48 EC — Regional legislation laying down mandatory minimum distances between roadside service stations — Jurisdiction of the Court and admissibility of the reference for a preliminary ruling — Freedom of establishment — Restriction) | 11 |
| 2010/C 113/15 | Case C-496/08 P: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 4 March 2010 — Pilar Angé Serrano, Jean-Marie Bras, Adolfo Orcajo Teresa, Dominiek Decoutere, Armin Hau, Francisco Javier Solana Ramos v European Parliament, Council of the European Union (Appeals — Officials — Success in internal competitions for change of category under the old Staff Regulations — Entry into force of the new Staff Regulations — Transitional rules for classification in grade — Plea of illegality — Acquired rights — Legitimate expectations — Equal treatment — Principle of sound administration and the duty to have regard for the welfare of officials) | 11 |
| 2010/C 113/16 | Case C-522/08: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 11 March 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny (Poland)) — Telekomunikacja Polska SA w Warszawie v Prezes Urzędu Komunikacji Elektronicznej (Electronic communications — Telecommunications services — Directive 2002/21/EC — Directive 2002/22/EC — Making the conclusion of a contract for the provision of services contingent on the conclusion of a contract for the supply of other services — Prohibition — Broadband internet) | 12 |
| 2010/C 113/17 | Case C-578/08: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 4 March 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State — Netherlands) — Rhimou Chakroun v Minister van Buitenlandse Zaken (Right to family reunification — Directive 2003/86/EC — Concept of ‘recourse to the social assistance system’ — Concept of ‘family reunification’ — Family formation) | 13 |
| 2010/C 113/18 | Case C-1/09: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 11 March 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d'État — France) — Centre d’exportation du livre français (CELF), in liquidation, Ministre de la Culture et de la Communication v Société internationale de diffusion et d’édition (State aid — Article 88(3) EC — Unlawful aid declared compatible with the common market — Annulment of the Commission decision — National courts — Application for recovery of unlawfully implemented aid — Proceedings stayed pending the adoption of a new Commission decision — Exceptional circumstances liable to limit the obligation to repay) | 13 |
| 2010/C 113/19 | Case C-19/09: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 11 March 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Wien — Austria) — Wood Floor Solutions Andreas Domberger GmbH v Silva Trade, SA (Jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters — Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 — Special jurisdiction — Article 5(1)(a) and (b), second indent — Provision of services — Commercial agency contract — Performance in several Member States) | 14 |
| 2010/C 113/20 | Case C-258/09: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 4 March 2010 — European Commission v Kingdom of Belgium (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Directive 2008/1/EC — integrated pollution prevention and control — Failure to transpose within the prescribed period) | 14 |
| 2010/C 113/21 | Case C-361/09 P: Appeal brought on 10 September 2009 by Mr Hans Molter against the order of the Court of First Instance (Eighth Chamber) delivered on 12 August 2009 in Case T-141/09 Hans Molter v Bundesrepublik Deutschland | 15 |
| 2010/C 113/22 | Case C-389/09: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Contencioso Administrativo Número 3 de Almería (Spain) lodged on 2 October 2009 — Águeda María Sáenz Morales v Consejería para la Igualdad y Bienestar Social | 15 |
| 2010/C 113/23 | Case C-21/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Bíróság lodged on 13 January 2010 — Károly Nagy v Mezőgazdasági és Vidékfejlesztési Hivatal | 15 |
| 2010/C 113/24 | Case C-33/10: Action brought on 20 January 2010 — European Commission v Kingdom of Denmark | 16 |
| 2010/C 113/25 | Case C-51/10 P: Appeal brought on 1 February 2010 by Agencja Wydawnicza Technopol sp. z o.o. against the judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) delivered on 19 November 2009 in Case T-298/06: gencja Wydawnicza Technopol sp. z o.o. v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) | 17 |
| 2010/C 113/26 | Case C-53/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht (Germany) lodged on 2 February 2010 — Land Hessen v Franz Mücksch OHG, Intervener: Merck KG aA | 17 |
| 2010/C 113/27 | Case C-54/10 P: Appeal brought on 2 February 2010 by Agencja Wydawnicza Technopol sp. z o.o. against the judgment delivered on 19 November 2009 in Joined Cases T-64/07 to T-66/07 Agencja Wydawnicza Technopol v OHIM (350) | 18 |
| 2010/C 113/28 | Case C-55/10 P: Appeal brought on 2 February 2010 by Agencja Wydawnicza Technopol sp. z o.o. against the judgment delivered on 19 November 2009 in Joined Cases T-200/07 to T-202/07 Agencja Wydawnicza Technopol v OHIM (222) | 18 |
| 2010/C 113/29 | Case C-56/10 P: Appeal brought on 2 February 2010 by Agencja Wydawnicza Technopol sp. z o.o. against the judgment delivered on 19 November 2009 in Joined Cases T-425/07 and T-426/07 Agencja Wydawnicza Technopol v OHIM (100) | 19 |
| 2010/C 113/30 | Case C-70/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d’appel de Bruxelles (Belgium) lodged on 5 February 2010 — Scarlet Extended SA v Société Belge des auteurs, compositeurs et éditeurs (SABAM) | 20 |
| 2010/C 113/31 | Case C-71/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from Supreme Court of the United Kingdom (United Kingdom) made on 8 February 2010 — Office of Communications v The Information Commissioner | 20 |
| 2010/C 113/32 | Case C-74/10 P: Appeal brought on 9 February 2010 by European Renewable Energies Federation ASBL (EREF) against the order of the Court of First Instance (Sixth Chamber) delivered on 19 November 2009 in Case T-94/07: European Renewable Energies Federation ASBL (EREF) v Commission of the European Communities | 21 |
| 2010/C 113/33 | Case C-75/10 P: Appeal brought on 9 February 2010 by European Renewable Energies Federation ASBL (EREF) against the order of the Court of First Instance (Sixth Chamber) delivered on 19 November 2009 in Case T-40/08: European Renewable Energies Federation ASBL (EREF) v Commission of the European Communities | 21 |
| 2010/C 113/34 | Case C-78/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d’Appel, Rouen (France) lodged on 8 February 2010 — Marc Berel, in his capacity as the authorised agent of the company Port Angot Développement, Mr Hess, in his capacity as receiver of the company Port Angot Développement, the company Rijn Schelde Mondia France, Receveur Principal des Douanes, Port of Rouen, Administration des Douanes, Port of Le Havre, the company Port Angot Développement, successor in title of the company Manutention de Produits Chimiques et Miniers (Maprochim), Asia Pulp & Paper France v Administration des Douanes, Rouen, Receveur Principal des Douanes, Le Havre, Administration des Douanes, Le Havre | 22 |
| 2010/C 113/35 | Case C-79/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof (Germany) lodged on 11 February 2010 — Systeme Helmholz GmbH v Hauptzollamt Nüremberg | 23 |
| 2010/C 113/36 | Case C-82/10: Action brought on 11 February 2010 — European Commission v Ireland | 23 |
| 2010/C 113/37 | Case C-83/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Mercantil de Pontevedra (Spain) lodged on 11 February 2010 — Aurora Sousa Rodriguez y otros v Air France S.A. | 24 |
| 2010/C 113/38 | Case C-86/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeitsgericht Siegburg (Germany) lodged on 12 February 2010 — Hüseyin Balaban v Zelter GmbH | 24 |
| 2010/C 113/39 | Case C-89/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank van eerste aanleg te Brussel (Belgium), lodged on 17 February 2010 — Q-Beef NV v Belgische Staat | 25 |
| 2010/C 113/40 | Case C-90/10: Action brought on 16 February 2010 — European Commission v Kingdom of Spain | 25 |
| 2010/C 113/41 | Case C-91/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Breda (Netherlands) lodged on 17 February 2010 — VAV Autovermietung GmbH v Inspector of the Revenue Department, Customs-South, Rosendaal office | 26 |
| 2010/C 113/42 | Case C-92/10 P: Appeal brought on 17 February 2010 by Media-Saturn-Holding GmbH against the judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) delivered on 15 December 2009 in Case T-476/08 Media-Saturn-Holding GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) | 27 |
| 2010/C 113/43 | Case C-95/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal Administrativo (Portugal) lodged on 22 February 2010 — Strong Segurança SA v Município de Sintra, Securitas-Serviços e Tecnologia de Segurança | 28 |
| 2010/C 113/44 | Case C-96/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank van eerste aanleg te Brussel (Belgium), lodged on 22 February 2010 — Frans Bosschaert v Belgische Staat, Slachthuizen Georges Goossens en Zonen NV and Slachthuizen Goossens NV | 28 |
| 2010/C 113/45 | Case C-97/10, Case C-98/10, Case C-99/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal d’Instance de Dax (France) lodged on 22 February 2010 — AG2R Prévoyance v SARL Bourdil — AG2R Prévoyance v SARL Boucalaise de Boulangerie — AG2R Prévoyance v SARL Baba-Pom’ | 29 |
| 2010/C 113/46 | Case C-100/10: Action brought on 23 February 2010 — European Commission v Grand Duchy of Luxembourg | 29 |
| 2010/C 113/47 | Case C-102/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Judecătoria Focșani (Romania) lodged on 24 February 2010 — Frăsina Bejan v Tudorel Mușat | 30 |
| 2010/C 113/48 | Case C-103/10: Action brought on 24 February 2010 — European Commission v Portuguese Republic | 31 |
| 2010/C 113/49 | Case C-106/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal Administrativo (Portugal) lodged on 25 February 2010 — Lidl & Companhia v Fazenda Pública | 32 |
| 2010/C 113/50 | Case C-111/10: Action brought on 1 March 2010 — European Commission v Council of the European Union | 32 |
| 2010/C 113/51 | Case C-112/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van Cassatie van België (Belgium), lodged on 1 March 2010 — Procureur-Generaal bij het Hof van Beroep te Antwerpen v Zaza Retail BV [Philippe and Cécile Noelmans, administrators in the winding-up of Zaza Retail BV (Belgium)]; voluntary intervener: Zaza Retail BV [Manon Cordewener, administrator in the winding-up of Zaza Retail BV (Netherlands)] | 33 |
| 2010/C 113/52 | Case C-116/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de Cassation du Grand-Duché de Luxembourg (Luxembourg) lodged on 3 March 2010 — Etat du Grand-Duché de Luxembourg, Administration de l’Enregistrement et des Domaines v Mr Pierre Feltgen (Administrator in the bankruptcy of the limited liability company BACINO CHARTER COMPANY S.A.), Bacino Charter Company S.A. | 33 |
| 2010/C 113/53 | Case C-117/10: Action brought on 3 March 2010 — European Commission v Council of the European Union | 34 |
| 2010/C 113/54 | Case C-118/10: Action brought on 3 March 2010 — European Commission v Council of the European Union | 35 |
| 2010/C 113/55 | Case C-122/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Marknadsdomstolen (Sweden) lodged on 8 March 2010 — Konsumentombudsmannen (KO) v Ving Sverige AB | 35 |
| 2010/C 113/56 | Case C-127/10: Action brought on 10 March 2010 — European Commission v Hellenic Republic | 36 |
| | General Court |
| 2010/C 113/57 | Case T-401/06: Judgment of the General Court of 4 March 2010 — Brosmann Footwear (HK) and Others v Council (Dumping — Imports of footwear with uppers of leather originating in China and Vietnam — Market economy treatment — Individual treatment — Sampling — Support of the complaint by the Community industry — Definition of the product concerned — Equal treatment — Injury — Legitimate expectations — Obligation to state the reasons on which the decision is based) | 37 |
| 2010/C 113/58 | Joined Cases T-407/06 and T-408/06: Judgment of the General Court of 4 March 2010 — Zhejiang Aokang Shoes and Wenzhou Taima Shoes v Council (Dumping — Imports of footwear with uppers of leather originating in China and Vietnam — Market economy treatment — Individual treatment — Sampling — Rights of the defence — Equal treatment — Injury — Legitimate expectations — Obligation to state the reasons on which the decision is based) | 37 |
| 2010/C 113/59 | Case T-409/06: Judgment of the General Court of 4 March 2010 — Sun Sang Kong Yuen Shoes Factory v Council (Dumping — Imports of footwear with uppers of leather from China and Vietnam — Market economy treatment — Sampling — Lack of cooperation — Rights of the defence — Injury — Obligation to state reasons) | 38 |
| 2010/C 113/60 | Case T-410/06: Judgment of the General Court of 4 March 2010 — Foshan City Nanhai Golden Step Industrial v Council (Dumping — Imports of footwear with uppers of leather originating in China and Vietnam — Calculation of the constructed normal value — Export price — Rights of the defence — Injury — Obligation to state the reasons on which the decision is based) | 39 |
| 2010/C 113/61 | Case T-9/07: Judgment of the General Court of 18 March 2010 — Grupo Promer Mon Graphic v OHIM — PepsiCo (Representation of a circular promotional item) (Community design — Invalidity proceedings — Registered Community design representing a circular promotional item — Prior design — Ground for invalidity — Conflict — No different overall impression — Meaning of ‘conflict’ — Product at issue — Degree of freedom of the designer — Informed user — Article 10 and Article 25(1)(d) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002) | 39 |
| 2010/C 113/62 | Case T-63/07: Judgment of the General Court of 17 March 2010 — Mäurer + Wirtz v OHIM — (tosca de FEDEOLIVA) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community figurative mark tosca de FEDEOLIVA — Earlier Community and national word marks TOSCA — Relative grounds for refusal — Failure to take an argument into consideration — Article 74(1) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 76(1) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)) | 40 |
| 2010/C 113/63 | Case T-190/07: Judgment of the General Court of 18 March 2010 — KEK Diavlos v European Commission (Financial assistance for the European citizen information programme (Prince) — Project concerning the preparation for the introduction of the euro in schools — Decision ordering reimbursement of the advance paid — Obligation to state reasons — Error of assessment) | 40 |
| 2010/C 113/64 | Case T-24/08: Judgment of the General Court of 4 March 2010 — Weldebräu v OHIM — Kofola Holding (Shape of a bottle with a helically formed neck) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for a three-dimensional Community trade mark — Shape of a bottle with a helically formed neck — Earlier three-dimensional Community trade mark consisting in the shape of a bottle with a helically formed neck — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)) | 41 |
| 2010/C 113/65 | Case T-94/08: Judgment of the General Court of 18 March 2010 — Centre de coordination Carrefour v Commission (Actions for annulment — State aid — Aid scheme for coordination centres established in Belgium — New decision of the Commission adopted following partial annulment by the Court — No interest in bringing proceedings — Inadmissibility) | 41 |
| 2010/C 113/66 | Case T-189/08: Judgment of the General Court of 18 March 2010 — Forum 187 v Commission (Actions for annulment — State aid — Aid scheme for coordination centres established in Belgium — New decision of the Commission adopted following partial annulment by the Court — Association — No interest in bringing proceedings — Inadmissibility) | 42 |
| 2010/C 113/67 | Case T-477/08: Judgment of the General Court of 4 March 2010 — Mundipharma v OHIM — ALK-Abelló (AVANZALENE) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community word mark AVANZALENE — Earlier Community word mark AVANZ — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)) | 42 |
| 2010/C 113/68 | Case T-564/08: Judgment of the General Court of 4 March 2010 — Monoscoop v OHIM (SUDOKU SAMURAI BINGO) (Community trade mark — Application for Community word mark SUDOKU SAMURAI BINGO — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)) | 43 |
| 2010/C 113/69 | Case T-15/09: Judgment of the General Court of 9 March 2010 — Euro-Information v OHIM (EURO AUTOMATIC CASH) (Community trade mark — Application for Community word mark EURO AUTOMATIC CASH — Absolute grounds for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) — Distinctive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)) | 43 |
| 2010/C 113/70 | Case T-31/09: Judgment of the General Court of 10 March 2010 — Baid v OHIM (LE GOMMAGE DES FACADES) (Community trade mark — Application for the Community word mark LE GOMMAGE DES FACADES — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009) — Duty to state reasons — First sentence of Article 73 of Regulation No 40/94 (now the first sentence of Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009)) | 44 |
| 2010/C 113/71 | Case T-77/09: Judgment of the General Court of 9 March 2010 — hofherr communikation GmbH v OHIM (NATURE WATCH) (Community trade mark — International registration designating the European Community — Word mark NATURE WATCH — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)) | 44 |
| 2010/C 113/72 | Case T-78/09: Judgment of the General Court of 17 March 2010 — Parliament v Collée (Appeal — Staff cases — Officials — Promotion — 2004 Promotion round — Procedure for the allocation of merit points — Distortion of the evidence — Statement of reasons — Value of the opinion of the Reports Committee — Principle of non-discrimination) | 45 |
| 2010/C 113/73 | Case T-538/08: Order of the General Court of 3 March 2010 — REWE-Zentral v OHIM — KODI Diskontläden (inéa) (Community trade mark — Opposition — Withdrawal of the opposition — No need to adjudicate) | 45 |
| 2010/C 113/74 | Case T-316/09: Order of the General Court of 25 February 2010 — Google v OHIM (ANDROID) (Community trade mark — Refusal of registration — Restriction of the list of goods for which registration is sought — Withdrawal of the objection to registration — No need to adjudicate) | 46 |
| 2010/C 113/75 | Case T-414/09: Order of the General Court of 4 March 2010 — Henkel v OHIM — JLO Holding (LIVE) (Community trade marks — Application for revocation — Withdrawal of the application for revocation — No need to adjudicate) | 46 |
| 2010/C 113/76 | Case T-435/09 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 15 March 2010 — GL2006 Europe v Commission and OLAF (Application for interim measures — Community programmes for research and technological development — Arbitration clause — Order for recovery — Debit note — Application for suspension of operation of a measure — Financial loss — No exceptional circumstances — No urgency) | 46 |
| 2010/C 113/77 | Case T-322/09: Action brought on 14 August 2009 — Al-Faqih and MIRA v Council and Commission | 47 |
| 2010/C 113/78 | Case T-52/10 P: Appeal brought on 9 February 2010 by Giorgio Lebedef against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal delivered on 30 November 2009 in Case F-54/09, Lebedef v Commission | 48 |
| 2010/C 113/79 | Case T-58/10: Action brought on 11 February 2010 — Phoenix-Reisen and DRV v Commission | 49 |
| 2010/C 113/80 | Case T-62/10 P: Appeal brought on 10 February 2010 by Brigitte Zangerl-Posselt against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of 30 November 2009 in Case F-83/07 Zangerl-Posselt v Commission | 49 |
| 2010/C 113/81 | Case T-63/10: Action brought on 10 February 2010 — Jurašinović v Council | 50 |
| 2010/C 113/82 | Case T-66/10: Action brought on 15 February 2010 — Zuckerfabrik Jülich AG v European Commission | 51 |
| 2010/C 113/83 | Case T-72/10: Action brought on 15 February 2010 — Intermark Srl v OHIM | 52 |
| 2010/C 113/84 | Case T-75/10: Action brought on 17 February 2010 — Embraer and others v Commission | 52 |
| 2010/C 113/85 | Case T-77/10: Action brought on 18 February 2010 — Certmedica International GmbH v OHIM — Lehning Enterprise (L112) | 53 |
| 2010/C 113/86 | Case T-78/10: Action brought on 19 February 2010 — Lehning Entreprise v OHIM — Certmedica International (L112) | 55 |
| 2010/C 113/87 | Case T-79/10: Action brought on 22 February 2010 — COLT Télécommunications France SAS v European Commission | 56 |
| 2010/C 113/88 | Case T-80/10: Action brought on 16 February 2010 — Bell & Ross v OHIM — Klockgrossisten i Norden (Representation of a watch) | 57 |
| 2010/C 113/89 | Case T-84/10: Action brought on 22 February 2010 — Regione Puglia v Commission | 58 |
| 2010/C 113/90 | Case T-86/10: Action brought on 17 February 2010 — British Sugar v Commission | 58 |
| 2010/C 113/91 | Case T-88/10: Action brought on 15 February 2010 — Inter IKEA Systems v OHIM — Meteor Controls (GLÄNSA) | 59 |
| 2010/C 113/92 | Case T-90/10: Action brought on 19 February 2010 — Ferriere Nord SpA v European Commission | 60 |
| 2010/C 113/93 | Case T-91/10: Action brought on 19 February 2010 — Lucchini v Commission | 61 |
| 2010/C 113/94 | Case T-92/10: Action brought on 17 February 2010 — Ferriera Valsabbia and Valsabbia Investimenti v Commission | 62 |
| 2010/C 113/95 | Case T-93/10: Action brought on 17 February 2010 — Bilbaína de Alquitranes e.a. v ECHA | 63 |
| 2010/C 113/96 | Case T-94/10: Action brought on 17 February 2010 — Rütgers Germany and Others v ECHA | 64 |
| 2010/C 113/97 | Case T-95/10: Action brought on 17 February 2010 — Cindu Chemicals and others v ECHA | 65 |
| 2010/C 113/98 | Case T-96/10: Action brought on 17 February 2010 — Rütgers Germany and others v ECHA | 66 |
| 2010/C 113/99 | Case T-99/10: Action brought on 2 March 2010 — Meica v OHIM — Tofutown.com (TOFUKING) | 66 |
| 2010/C 113/00 | Case T-100/10: Action brought on 3 March 2010 — Nordzucker v Commission | 67 |
| 2010/C 113/01 | Case T-101/10: Action brought on 3 March 2010 — Poland v Commission | 68 |
| 2010/C 113/02 | Case T-102/10: Action brought on 3 March 2010 — Südzucker and Others v Commission | 69 |
| 2010/C 113/03 | Case T-103/10 P(R): Appeal brought on 5 March 2010 by the European Parliament against the order of 18 December 2009 of the President of the Civil Service Tribunal in Case F-92/09 R U v Parliament | 70 |
| 2010/C 113/04 | Case T-105/10: Action brought on 1 March 2010 — BASF v Commission | 70 |
| 2010/C 113/05 | Case T-106/10: Action brought on 4 March 2010 — Spain v Commission | 71 |
| 2010/C 113/06 | Case T-111/10: Action brought on 3 March 2010 — Portugal v Commission | 72 |
| 2010/C 113/07 | Case T-112/10: Action brought on 1 March 2010 — Prionics v Commission and EFSA | 73 |
| 2010/C 113/08 | Case T-113/10: Action brought on 8 March 2010 — Spain v Commission | 74 |
| 2010/C 113/09 | Case T-115/10: Action brought on 4 March 2010 — United Kingdom v Commission | 75 |
| 2010/C 113/10 | Case T-118/10: Action brought on 5 Mars 2010 — Acron v Council | 76 |
| 2010/C 113/11 | Case T-119/10: Action brought on 5 March 2010 — Netherlands v Commission | 77 |
| 2010/C 113/12 | Case T-310/07: Order of the General Court of 2 March 2010 — gardeur v OHIM — Blue Rose (g) | 78 |
| 2010/C 113/13 | Case T-298/08: Order of the General Court of 2 March 2010 — Aldi v OHIM — Catalana de Telecomunicacions Societat Operadora de Xarxes (ALDI) | 78 |
| 2010/C 113/14 | Case T-552/08: Order of the General Court of 4 March 2010 — Commission v Domótica | 78 |
| 2010/C 113/15 | Case T-196/09: Order of the General Court of 1 March 2010 — TerreStar Europe v Commission | 78 |
| | European Union Civil Service Tribunal |
| 2010/C 113/16 | Case F-9/10: Action brought on 29 January 2010 — AC v Council | 79 |
| 2010/C 113/17 | Case F-12/10: Action brought on 9 February 2010 — Kerstens v European Commission | 79 |

V   Announcements

COURT PROCEEDINGS

Court of Justice

2010/C 113/02

Case C-38/06: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 4 March 2010 — Commission of the European Communities v Portuguese Republic (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Duty-free imports of goods for specifically military use)

2

2010/C 113/03

Case C-424/07: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 3 December 2009 — European Commission v Federal Republic of Germany (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Electronic communications — Directive 2002/19/EC — Directive 2002/21/EC — Directive 2002/22/EC — Networks and services — National rules — New markets)

3

2010/C 113/04

Case C-518/07: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 9 March 2010 — European Commission v Federal Republic of Germany (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Directive 95/46/EC — Protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and the free movement of such data — Article 28(1) — National supervisory authorities — Independence — Administrative scrutiny of those authorities)

3

2010/C 113/05

Case C-135/08: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 2 March 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht (Germany)) — Janko Rottmann v Freistaat Bayern (Citizenship of the Union — Article 17 EC — Nationality of one Member State acquired by birth — Nationality of another Member State acquired by naturalisation — Loss of original nationality by reason of that naturalisation — Loss with retroactive effect of nationality acquired by naturalisation on account of deception practised in that acquisition — Statelessness leading to loss of the status of citizen of the Union)

4

2010/C 113/06

Joined Cases C-175/08, C-176/08, C-178/08 and C-179/08: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 2 March 2010 (references for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht — Germany) — Aydin Salahadin Abdulla (C-175/08), Kamil Hasan (C-176/08), Ahmed Adem, Hamrin Mosa Rashi (C-178/08), Dler Jamal (C-179/08) v Bundesrepublik Deutschland (Directive 2004/83/EC — Minimum standards for determining who qualifies for refugee status or for subsidiary protection status — Classification as a ‘refugee’ — Article 2(c) — Cessation of refugee status — Article 11 — Change of circumstances — Article 11(1)(e) — Refugee — Unfounded fear of persecution — Assessment — Article 11(2) — Revocation of refugee status — Proof — Article 14(2))

4

2010/C 113/07

Case C-197/08: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 4 March 2010 — European Commission v French Republic (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Directive 95/59/EC — Taxes other than turnover taxes which affect the consumption of manufactured tobacco — Article 9(1) — Free determination, by manufacturers and importers, of the maximum retail selling prices of their products — National legislation imposing a minimum retail selling price for cigarettes — National legislation prohibiting the sale of tobacco products ‘at a promotional price which is contrary to public health objectives’ — Concept of ‘national systems of legislation regarding the control of price levels or the observance of imposed prices’ — Justification — Protection of public health — World Health Organisation Framework Convention on Tobacco Control)

6

2010/C 113/08

Case C-198/08: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 4 March 2010 — European Commission v Republic of Austria (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Directive 95/59/EC — Taxes other than turnover taxes which affect the consumption of manufactured tobacco — Article 9(1) — Free determination, by manufacturers and importers, of the maximum retail selling prices of their products — National legislation imposing a minimum retail selling price for cigarettes and a minimum retail selling price for fine-cut tobacco — Justification — Protection of public health — World Health Organisation Framework Convention on Tobacco Control)

6

2010/C 113/09

Case C-221/08: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 4 March 2010 — European Commission v Ireland (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Directive 95/59/EC — Taxes other than turnover taxes which affect the consumption of manufactured tobacco — Article 9(1) — Free determination, by manufacturers and importers, of the maximum retail selling prices of their products — National legislation imposing a minimum retail selling price for cigarettes — Justification — Protection of public health — World Health Organisation Framework Convention on Tobacco Control)

7

2010/C 113/10

Case C-241/08: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 4 March 2010 — European Commission v French Republic (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Directive 92/43/EEC — Article 6(2) and (3) — Incorrect transposition — Special areas of conservation — Significant effect of a project on the environment — ‘Non-disturbing’ nature of certain activities — Assessment of the effects on the environment)

7

2010/C 113/11

Case C-297/08: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 4 March 2010 — Commission of the European Communities v Italian Republic (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Environment — Directive 2006/12/EC — Articles 4 and 5 — Waste management — Management plan — Integrated and adequate network of disposal installations — Danger for human health or the environment — Force majeure — Civil disturbances — Organised crime)

8

2010/C 113/12

Case C-378/08: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 9 March 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale amministrativo regionale della Sicilia — Italy) — Raffinerie Mediterranee (ERG) SpA, Polimeri Europa SpA, Syndial SpA v Ministero dello Sviluppo economico, Ministero della Salute, Ministero Ambiente e Tutela del Territorio e del Mare, Ministero delle Infrastrutture, Ministero dei Trasporti, Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri, Ministero dell’Interno, Regione siciliana, Assessorato regionale Territorio ed Ambiente (Sicilia), Assessorato regionale Industria (Sicilia), Prefettura di Siracusa, Istituto superiore di Sanità, Commissario Delegato per Emergenza Rifiuti e Tutela Acque (Sicilia), Vice Commissario Delegato per Emergenza Rifiuti e Tutela Acque (Sicilia), Agenzia Protezione Ambiente e Servizi tecnici (APAT), Agenzia regionale Protezione Ambiente (ARPA Sicilia), Istituto centrale Ricerca scientifica e tecnologica applicata al Mare, Subcommissario per la Bonifica dei Siti contaminati, Provincia regionale di Siracusa, Consorzio ASI Sicilia orientale Zona Sud, Comune di Siracusa, Comune di Augusta, Comune di Melilli, Comune di Priolo Gargallo, Azienda Unità sanitaria locale No 8, Sviluppo Italia Aree Produttive SpA, Invitalia (Agenzia nazionale per l’attrazione degli investimenti e lo sviluppo d’impresa) SpA, formerly Sviluppo Italia SpA, (‘Polluter pays’ principle — Directive 2004/35/EC — Environmental liability — Applicability ratione temporis — Pollution occurring before the date laid down for implementation of that directive and continuing after that date — National legislation imposing liability on a number of undertakings for the costs of remedying the damage connected with such pollution — Requirement for fault or negligence — Requirement for a causal link — Public works contracts)

8

2010/C 113/13

Joined Cases C-379/08 and C-380/08: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 9 March 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale della Sicilia (Italy)) — Raffineri Mediterranee SpA (ERG) (C-379/08), Polimeri Europa SpA, Syndial SpA v Ministero dello Sviluppo economico, Ministero della Salute, Ministero Ambiente e Tutela del Territorio e del Mare, Ministero delle Infrastrutture, Ministero dei Trasporti, Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri, Ministero dell’Interno, Regione Siciliana, Assessorato regionale Territorio ed Ambiente (Sicilia), Assessorato regionale Industria (Sicilia), Prefettura di Siracusa, Istituto superiore di Sanità, Commissario Delegato per Emergenza Rifiuti e Tutela Acque (Sicilia), Vice Commissario Delegato per Emergenza Rifiuti e Tutela Acque (Sicilia), Agenzia Protezione Ambiente e Servizi tecnici (APAT), Agenzia regionale Protezione Ambiente (ARPA Sicilia), Istituto centrale Ricerca scientifica e tecnologica applicata al Mare, Subcommissario per la Bonifica dei Siti contaminati, Provincia regionale di Siracusa, Consorzio ASI Sicilia orientale Zona Sud, Comune di Siracusa, Comune di Augusta, Comune di Melilli, Comune di Priolo Gargallo, Azienda Unità sanitaria locale No 8, Sviluppo Italia Aree Produttive SpA, Invitalia (Agenzia nazionale per l’attrazione degli investimenti e lo sviluppo d’impresa) SpA, formerly Sviluppo Italia SpA, ENI SpA (C-380/08) v Ministero Ambiente e Tutela del Territorio e del Mare, Ministero dello Sviluppo economico, Ministero della Salute, Regione siciliana, Istituto superiore di Sanità, Agenzia per la Protezione dell’Ambiente e per i Servizi tecnici, Commissario delegato per l’Emergenza rifiuti e la Tutela delle Acque (‘Polluter pays’ principle — Directive 2004/35/EC — Environmental liability — Applicability ratione temporis — Pollution occurring before the date laid down for implementation of that directive and continuing after that date — Remedial measures — Duty to consult the undertakings concerned — Annexe II)

10

2010/C 113/14

Case C-384/08: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 11 March 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale amministrativo regionale del Lazio — Italy) — Attanasio Group Srl v Comune di Carbognano (Articles 43 EC and 48 EC — Regional legislation laying down mandatory minimum distances between roadside service stations — Jurisdiction of the Court and admissibility of the reference for a preliminary ruling — Freedom of establishment — Restriction)

11

2010/C 113/15

Case C-496/08 P: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 4 March 2010 — Pilar Angé Serrano, Jean-Marie Bras, Adolfo Orcajo Teresa, Dominiek Decoutere, Armin Hau, Francisco Javier Solana Ramos v European Parliament, Council of the European Union (Appeals — Officials — Success in internal competitions for change of category under the old Staff Regulations — Entry into force of the new Staff Regulations — Transitional rules for classification in grade — Plea of illegality — Acquired rights — Legitimate expectations — Equal treatment — Principle of sound administration and the duty to have regard for the welfare of officials)

11

2010/C 113/16

Case C-522/08: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 11 March 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny (Poland)) — Telekomunikacja Polska SA w Warszawie v Prezes Urzędu Komunikacji Elektronicznej (Electronic communications — Telecommunications services — Directive 2002/21/EC — Directive 2002/22/EC — Making the conclusion of a contract for the provision of services contingent on the conclusion of a contract for the supply of other services — Prohibition — Broadband internet)

12

2010/C 113/17

Case C-578/08: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 4 March 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State — Netherlands) — Rhimou Chakroun v Minister van Buitenlandse Zaken (Right to family reunification — Directive 2003/86/EC — Concept of ‘recourse to the social assistance system’ — Concept of ‘family reunification’ — Family formation)

13

2010/C 113/18

Case C-1/09: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 11 March 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d'État — France) — Centre d’exportation du livre français (CELF), in liquidation, Ministre de la Culture et de la Communication v Société internationale de diffusion et d’édition (State aid — Article 88(3) EC — Unlawful aid declared compatible with the common market — Annulment of the Commission decision — National courts — Application for recovery of unlawfully implemented aid — Proceedings stayed pending the adoption of a new Commission decision — Exceptional circumstances liable to limit the obligation to repay)

13

2010/C 113/19

Case C-19/09: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 11 March 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Wien — Austria) — Wood Floor Solutions Andreas Domberger GmbH v Silva Trade, SA (Jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters — Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 — Special jurisdiction — Article 5(1)(a) and (b), second indent — Provision of services — Commercial agency contract — Performance in several Member States)

14

2010/C 113/20

Case C-258/09: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 4 March 2010 — European Commission v Kingdom of Belgium (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Directive 2008/1/EC — integrated pollution prevention and control — Failure to transpose within the prescribed period)

14

2010/C 113/21

Case C-361/09 P: Appeal brought on 10 September 2009 by Mr Hans Molter against the order of the Court of First Instance (Eighth Chamber) delivered on 12 August 2009 in Case T-141/09 Hans Molter v Bundesrepublik Deutschland

15

2010/C 113/22

Case C-389/09: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Contencioso Administrativo Número 3 de Almería (Spain) lodged on 2 October 2009 — Águeda María Sáenz Morales v Consejería para la Igualdad y Bienestar Social

15

2010/C 113/23

Case C-21/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Bíróság lodged on 13 January 2010 — Károly Nagy v Mezőgazdasági és Vidékfejlesztési Hivatal

15

2010/C 113/24

Case C-33/10: Action brought on 20 January 2010 — European Commission v Kingdom of Denmark

16

2010/C 113/25

Case C-51/10 P: Appeal brought on 1 February 2010 by Agencja Wydawnicza Technopol sp. z o.o. against the judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) delivered on 19 November 2009 in Case T-298/06: gencja Wydawnicza Technopol sp. z o.o. v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

17

2010/C 113/26

Case C-53/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht (Germany) lodged on 2 February 2010 — Land Hessen v Franz Mücksch OHG, Intervener: Merck KG aA

17

2010/C 113/27

Case C-54/10 P: Appeal brought on 2 February 2010 by Agencja Wydawnicza Technopol sp. z o.o. against the judgment delivered on 19 November 2009 in Joined Cases T-64/07 to T-66/07 Agencja Wydawnicza Technopol v OHIM (350)

18

2010/C 113/28

Case C-55/10 P: Appeal brought on 2 February 2010 by Agencja Wydawnicza Technopol sp. z o.o. against the judgment delivered on 19 November 2009 in Joined Cases T-200/07 to T-202/07 Agencja Wydawnicza Technopol v OHIM (222)

18

2010/C 113/29

Case C-56/10 P: Appeal brought on 2 February 2010 by Agencja Wydawnicza Technopol sp. z o.o. against the judgment delivered on 19 November 2009 in Joined Cases T-425/07 and T-426/07 Agencja Wydawnicza Technopol v OHIM (100)

19

2010/C 113/30

Case C-70/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d’appel de Bruxelles (Belgium) lodged on 5 February 2010 — Scarlet Extended SA v Société Belge des auteurs, compositeurs et éditeurs (SABAM)

20

2010/C 113/31

Case C-71/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from Supreme Court of the United Kingdom (United Kingdom) made on 8 February 2010 — Office of Communications v The Information Commissioner

20

2010/C 113/32

Case C-74/10 P: Appeal brought on 9 February 2010 by European Renewable Energies Federation ASBL (EREF) against the order of the Court of First Instance (Sixth Chamber) delivered on 19 November 2009 in Case T-94/07: European Renewable Energies Federation ASBL (EREF) v Commission of the European Communities

21

2010/C 113/33

Case C-75/10 P: Appeal brought on 9 February 2010 by European Renewable Energies Federation ASBL (EREF) against the order of the Court of First Instance (Sixth Chamber) delivered on 19 November 2009 in Case T-40/08: European Renewable Energies Federation ASBL (EREF) v Commission of the European Communities

21

2010/C 113/34

Case C-78/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d’Appel, Rouen (France) lodged on 8 February 2010 — Marc Berel, in his capacity as the authorised agent of the company Port Angot Développement, Mr Hess, in his capacity as receiver of the company Port Angot Développement, the company Rijn Schelde Mondia France, Receveur Principal des Douanes, Port of Rouen, Administration des Douanes, Port of Le Havre, the company Port Angot Développement, successor in title of the company Manutention de Produits Chimiques et Miniers (Maprochim), Asia Pulp & Paper France v Administration des Douanes, Rouen, Receveur Principal des Douanes, Le Havre, Administration des Douanes, Le Havre

22

2010/C 113/35

Case C-79/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof (Germany) lodged on 11 February 2010 — Systeme Helmholz GmbH v Hauptzollamt Nüremberg

23

2010/C 113/36

Case C-82/10: Action brought on 11 February 2010 — European Commission v Ireland

23

2010/C 113/37

Case C-83/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Mercantil de Pontevedra (Spain) lodged on 11 February 2010 — Aurora Sousa Rodriguez y otros v Air France S.A.

24

2010/C 113/38

Case C-86/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeitsgericht Siegburg (Germany) lodged on 12 February 2010 — Hüseyin Balaban v Zelter GmbH

24

2010/C 113/39

Case C-89/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank van eerste aanleg te Brussel (Belgium), lodged on 17 February 2010 — Q-Beef NV v Belgische Staat

25

2010/C 113/40

Case C-90/10: Action brought on 16 February 2010 — European Commission v Kingdom of Spain

25

2010/C 113/41

Case C-91/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Breda (Netherlands) lodged on 17 February 2010 — VAV Autovermietung GmbH v Inspector of the Revenue Department, Customs-South, Rosendaal office

26

2010/C 113/42

Case C-92/10 P: Appeal brought on 17 February 2010 by Media-Saturn-Holding GmbH against the judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) delivered on 15 December 2009 in Case T-476/08 Media-Saturn-Holding GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

27

2010/C 113/43

Case C-95/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal Administrativo (Portugal) lodged on 22 February 2010 — Strong Segurança SA v Município de Sintra, Securitas-Serviços e Tecnologia de Segurança

28

2010/C 113/44

Case C-96/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank van eerste aanleg te Brussel (Belgium), lodged on 22 February 2010 — Frans Bosschaert v Belgische Staat, Slachthuizen Georges Goossens en Zonen NV and Slachthuizen Goossens NV

28

2010/C 113/45

Case C-97/10, Case C-98/10, Case C-99/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal d’Instance de Dax (France) lodged on 22 February 2010 — AG2R Prévoyance v SARL Bourdil — AG2R Prévoyance v SARL Boucalaise de Boulangerie — AG2R Prévoyance v SARL Baba-Pom’

29

2010/C 113/46

Case C-100/10: Action brought on 23 February 2010 — European Commission v Grand Duchy of Luxembourg

29

2010/C 113/47

Case C-102/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Judecătoria Focșani (Romania) lodged on 24 February 2010 — Frăsina Bejan v Tudorel Mușat

30

2010/C 113/48

Case C-103/10: Action brought on 24 February 2010 — European Commission v Portuguese Republic

31

2010/C 113/49

Case C-106/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal Administrativo (Portugal) lodged on 25 February 2010 — Lidl & Companhia v Fazenda Pública

32

2010/C 113/50

Case C-111/10: Action brought on 1 March 2010 — European Commission v Council of the European Union

32

2010/C 113/51

Case C-112/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van Cassatie van België (Belgium), lodged on 1 March 2010 — Procureur-Generaal bij het Hof van Beroep te Antwerpen v Zaza Retail BV [Philippe and Cécile Noelmans, administrators in the winding-up of Zaza Retail BV (Belgium)]; voluntary intervener: Zaza Retail BV [Manon Cordewener, administrator in the winding-up of Zaza Retail BV (Netherlands)]

33

2010/C 113/52

Case C-116/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de Cassation du Grand-Duché de Luxembourg (Luxembourg) lodged on 3 March 2010 — Etat du Grand-Duché de Luxembourg, Administration de l’Enregistrement et des Domaines v Mr Pierre Feltgen (Administrator in the bankruptcy of the limited liability company BACINO CHARTER COMPANY S.A.), Bacino Charter Company S.A.

33

2010/C 113/53

Case C-117/10: Action brought on 3 March 2010 — European Commission v Council of the European Union

34

2010/C 113/54

Case C-118/10: Action brought on 3 March 2010 — European Commission v Council of the European Union

35

2010/C 113/55

Case C-122/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Marknadsdomstolen (Sweden) lodged on 8 March 2010 — Konsumentombudsmannen (KO) v Ving Sverige AB

35

2010/C 113/56

Case C-127/10: Action brought on 10 March 2010 — European Commission v Hellenic Republic

36

General Court

2010/C 113/57

Case T-401/06: Judgment of the General Court of 4 March 2010 — Brosmann Footwear (HK) and Others v Council (Dumping — Imports of footwear with uppers of leather originating in China and Vietnam — Market economy treatment — Individual treatment — Sampling — Support of the complaint by the Community industry — Definition of the product concerned — Equal treatment — Injury — Legitimate expectations — Obligation to state the reasons on which the decision is based)

37

2010/C 113/58

Joined Cases T-407/06 and T-408/06: Judgment of the General Court of 4 March 2010 — Zhejiang Aokang Shoes and Wenzhou Taima Shoes v Council (Dumping — Imports of footwear with uppers of leather originating in China and Vietnam — Market economy treatment — Individual treatment — Sampling — Rights of the defence — Equal treatment — Injury — Legitimate expectations — Obligation to state the reasons on which the decision is based)

37

2010/C 113/59

Case T-409/06: Judgment of the General Court of 4 March 2010 — Sun Sang Kong Yuen Shoes Factory v Council (Dumping — Imports of footwear with uppers of leather from China and Vietnam — Market economy treatment — Sampling — Lack of cooperation — Rights of the defence — Injury — Obligation to state reasons)

38

2010/C 113/60

Case T-410/06: Judgment of the General Court of 4 March 2010 — Foshan City Nanhai Golden Step Industrial v Council (Dumping — Imports of footwear with uppers of leather originating in China and Vietnam — Calculation of the constructed normal value — Export price — Rights of the defence — Injury — Obligation to state the reasons on which the decision is based)

39

2010/C 113/61

Case T-9/07: Judgment of the General Court of 18 March 2010 — Grupo Promer Mon Graphic v OHIM — PepsiCo (Representation of a circular promotional item) (Community design — Invalidity proceedings — Registered Community design representing a circular promotional item — Prior design — Ground for invalidity — Conflict — No different overall impression — Meaning of ‘conflict’ — Product at issue — Degree of freedom of the designer — Informed user — Article 10 and Article 25(1)(d) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002)

39

2010/C 113/62

Case T-63/07: Judgment of the General Court of 17 March 2010 — Mäurer + Wirtz v OHIM — (tosca de FEDEOLIVA) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community figurative mark tosca de FEDEOLIVA — Earlier Community and national word marks TOSCA — Relative grounds for refusal — Failure to take an argument into consideration — Article 74(1) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 76(1) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

40

2010/C 113/63

Case T-190/07: Judgment of the General Court of 18 March 2010 — KEK Diavlos v European Commission (Financial assistance for the European citizen information programme (Prince) — Project concerning the preparation for the introduction of the euro in schools — Decision ordering reimbursement of the advance paid — Obligation to state reasons — Error of assessment)

40

2010/C 113/64

Case T-24/08: Judgment of the General Court of 4 March 2010 — Weldebräu v OHIM — Kofola Holding (Shape of a bottle with a helically formed neck) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for a three-dimensional Community trade mark — Shape of a bottle with a helically formed neck — Earlier three-dimensional Community trade mark consisting in the shape of a bottle with a helically formed neck — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

41

2010/C 113/65

Case T-94/08: Judgment of the General Court of 18 March 2010 — Centre de coordination Carrefour v Commission (Actions for annulment — State aid — Aid scheme for coordination centres established in Belgium — New decision of the Commission adopted following partial annulment by the Court — No interest in bringing proceedings — Inadmissibility)

41

2010/C 113/66

Case T-189/08: Judgment of the General Court of 18 March 2010 — Forum 187 v Commission (Actions for annulment — State aid — Aid scheme for coordination centres established in Belgium — New decision of the Commission adopted following partial annulment by the Court — Association — No interest in bringing proceedings — Inadmissibility)

42

2010/C 113/67

Case T-477/08: Judgment of the General Court of 4 March 2010 — Mundipharma v OHIM — ALK-Abelló (AVANZALENE) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community word mark AVANZALENE — Earlier Community word mark AVANZ — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

42

2010/C 113/68

Case T-564/08: Judgment of the General Court of 4 March 2010 — Monoscoop v OHIM (SUDOKU SAMURAI BINGO) (Community trade mark — Application for Community word mark SUDOKU SAMURAI BINGO — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

43

2010/C 113/69

Case T-15/09: Judgment of the General Court of 9 March 2010 — Euro-Information v OHIM (EURO AUTOMATIC CASH) (Community trade mark — Application for Community word mark EURO AUTOMATIC CASH — Absolute grounds for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) — Distinctive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

43

2010/C 113/70

Case T-31/09: Judgment of the General Court of 10 March 2010 — Baid v OHIM (LE GOMMAGE DES FACADES) (Community trade mark — Application for the Community word mark LE GOMMAGE DES FACADES — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009) — Duty to state reasons — First sentence of Article 73 of Regulation No 40/94 (now the first sentence of Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009))

44

2010/C 113/71

Case T-77/09: Judgment of the General Court of 9 March 2010 — hofherr communikation GmbH v OHIM (NATURE WATCH) (Community trade mark — International registration designating the European Community — Word mark NATURE WATCH — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

44

2010/C 113/72

Case T-78/09: Judgment of the General Court of 17 March 2010 — Parliament v Collée (Appeal — Staff cases — Officials — Promotion — 2004 Promotion round — Procedure for the allocation of merit points — Distortion of the evidence — Statement of reasons — Value of the opinion of the Reports Committee — Principle of non-discrimination)

45

2010/C 113/73

Case T-538/08: Order of the General Court of 3 March 2010 — REWE-Zentral v OHIM — KODI Diskontläden (inéa) (Community trade mark — Opposition — Withdrawal of the opposition — No need to adjudicate)

45

2010/C 113/74

Case T-316/09: Order of the General Court of 25 February 2010 — Google v OHIM (ANDROID) (Community trade mark — Refusal of registration — Restriction of the list of goods for which registration is sought — Withdrawal of the objection to registration — No need to adjudicate)

46

2010/C 113/75

Case T-414/09: Order of the General Court of 4 March 2010 — Henkel v OHIM — JLO Holding (LIVE) (Community trade marks — Application for revocation — Withdrawal of the application for revocation — No need to adjudicate)

46

2010/C 113/76

Case T-435/09 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 15 March 2010 — GL2006 Europe v Commission and OLAF (Application for interim measures — Community programmes for research and technological development — Arbitration clause — Order for recovery — Debit note — Application for suspension of operation of a measure — Financial loss — No exceptional circumstances — No urgency)

46

2010/C 113/77

Case T-322/09: Action brought on 14 August 2009 — Al-Faqih and MIRA v Council and Commission

47

2010/C 113/78

Case T-52/10 P: Appeal brought on 9 February 2010 by Giorgio Lebedef against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal delivered on 30 November 2009 in Case F-54/09, Lebedef v Commission

48

2010/C 113/79

Case T-58/10: Action brought on 11 February 2010 — Phoenix-Reisen and DRV v Commission

49

2010/C 113/80

Case T-62/10 P: Appeal brought on 10 February 2010 by Brigitte Zangerl-Posselt against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of 30 November 2009 in Case F-83/07 Zangerl-Posselt v Commission

49

2010/C 113/81

Case T-63/10: Action brought on 10 February 2010 — Jurašinović v Council

50

2010/C 113/82

Case T-66/10: Action brought on 15 February 2010 — Zuckerfabrik Jülich AG v European Commission

51

2010/C 113/83

Case T-72/10: Action brought on 15 February 2010 — Intermark Srl v OHIM

52

2010/C 113/84

Case T-75/10: Action brought on 17 February 2010 — Embraer and others v Commission

52

2010/C 113/85

Case T-77/10: Action brought on 18 February 2010 — Certmedica International GmbH v OHIM — Lehning Enterprise (L112)

53

2010/C 113/86

Case T-78/10: Action brought on 19 February 2010 — Lehning Entreprise v OHIM — Certmedica International (L112)

55

2010/C 113/87

Case T-79/10: Action brought on 22 February 2010 — COLT Télécommunications France SAS v European Commission

56

2010/C 113/88

Case T-80/10: Action brought on 16 February 2010 — Bell & Ross v OHIM — Klockgrossisten i Norden (Representation of a watch)

57

2010/C 113/89

Case T-84/10: Action brought on 22 February 2010 — Regione Puglia v Commission

58

2010/C 113/90

Case T-86/10: Action brought on 17 February 2010 — British Sugar v Commission

58

2010/C 113/91

Case T-88/10: Action brought on 15 February 2010 — Inter IKEA Systems v OHIM — Meteor Controls (GLÄNSA)

59

2010/C 113/92

Case T-90/10: Action brought on 19 February 2010 — Ferriere Nord SpA v European Commission

60

2010/C 113/93

Case T-91/10: Action brought on 19 February 2010 — Lucchini v Commission

61

2010/C 113/94

Case T-92/10: Action brought on 17 February 2010 — Ferriera Valsabbia and Valsabbia Investimenti v Commission

62

2010/C 113/95

Case T-93/10: Action brought on 17 February 2010 — Bilbaína de Alquitranes e.a. v ECHA

63

2010/C 113/96

Case T-94/10: Action brought on 17 February 2010 — Rütgers Germany and Others v ECHA

64

2010/C 113/97

Case T-95/10: Action brought on 17 February 2010 — Cindu Chemicals and others v ECHA

65

2010/C 113/98

Case T-96/10: Action brought on 17 February 2010 — Rütgers Germany and others v ECHA

66

2010/C 113/99

Case T-99/10: Action brought on 2 March 2010 — Meica v OHIM — Tofutown.com (TOFUKING)

66

2010/C 113/00

Case T-100/10: Action brought on 3 March 2010 — Nordzucker v Commission

67

2010/C 113/01

Case T-101/10: Action brought on 3 March 2010 — Poland v Commission

68

2010/C 113/02

Case T-102/10: Action brought on 3 March 2010 — Südzucker and Others v Commission

69

2010/C 113/03

Case T-103/10 P(R): Appeal brought on 5 March 2010 by the European Parliament against the order of 18 December 2009 of the President of the Civil Service Tribunal in Case F-92/09 R U v Parliament

70

2010/C 113/04

Case T-105/10: Action brought on 1 March 2010 — BASF v Commission

70

2010/C 113/05

Case T-106/10: Action brought on 4 March 2010 — Spain v Commission

71

2010/C 113/06

Case T-111/10: Action brought on 3 March 2010 — Portugal v Commission

72

2010/C 113/07

Case T-112/10: Action brought on 1 March 2010 — Prionics v Commission and EFSA

73

2010/C 113/08

Case T-113/10: Action brought on 8 March 2010 — Spain v Commission

74

2010/C 113/09

Case T-115/10: Action brought on 4 March 2010 — United Kingdom v Commission

75

2010/C 113/10

Case T-118/10: Action brought on 5 Mars 2010 — Acron v Council

76

2010/C 113/11

Case T-119/10: Action brought on 5 March 2010 — Netherlands v Commission

77

2010/C 113/12

Case T-310/07: Order of the General Court of 2 March 2010 — gardeur v OHIM — Blue Rose (g)

78

2010/C 113/13

Case T-298/08: Order of the General Court of 2 March 2010 — Aldi v OHIM — Catalana de Telecomunicacions Societat Operadora de Xarxes (ALDI)

78

2010/C 113/14

Case T-552/08: Order of the General Court of 4 March 2010 — Commission v Domótica

78

2010/C 113/15

Case T-196/09: Order of the General Court of 1 March 2010 — TerreStar Europe v Commission

78

European Union Civil Service Tribunal

2010/C 113/16

Case F-9/10: Action brought on 29 January 2010 — AC v Council

79

2010/C 113/17

Case F-12/10: Action brought on 9 February 2010 — Kerstens v European Commission

79

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN