III 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 359 

Concerning the Government of Romania’s ban on intercountry adoptions 

and the welfare of orphaned or abandoned children in Romania. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 31, 2006 

Ms. LANDRIEU (for herself, Mr. CRAIG, Mr. DODD, Mr. INHOFE, Mr. 

BUNNING, Mr. PRYOR, Ms. COLLINS, Mr. COCHRAN, Mr. BENNETT, Mrs. 

LINCOLN, Mr. LIEBERMAN, Mr. BURR, and Mrs. DOLE) submitted the 

following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations 

MAY 23, 2006 

Reported by Mr. LUGAR, without amendment 

JULY 27 (legislative day, JULY 26), 2006 

Considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Concerning the Government of Romania’s ban on intercountry adoptions and the welfare of orphaned or abandoned children in Romania. 

Whereas following the execution of Romanian President 

Nicolae Ceausescu in 1989, it was discovered that more 

than 100,000 underfed, neglected children throughout 

Romania were living in hundreds of squalid and inhumane institutions; 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
2 

SRES 359 ATS 

Whereas citizens of the United States responded to the dire 

situation of these children with an outpouring of compassion and assistance to improve conditions in those institutions and to provide for the needs of abandoned children 

in Romania; 

Whereas, between 1990 and 2004, citizens of the United 

States adopted more than 8,200 Romanian children, with 

a similar response from the citizens of Western Europe; 

Whereas the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) reported in March 2005 that more than 9,000 children a 

year are abandoned in Romania’s maternity wards or pediatric hospitals and that child abandonment in Romania 

in ‘‘2003 and 2004 was no different from that occurring 

10, 20, or 30 years ago’’; 

Whereas there are approximately 37,000 orphaned or abandoned children in Romania today living in state institutions, an additional 49,000 living in temporary arrangements, such as foster care, and an unknown number of 

children living on the streets and in maternity and pediatric hospitals; 

Whereas, on December 28, 1994, Romania ratified the 

Hague Convention on Protection of Children and Co-operation in Respect of Intercountry Adoption which recognizes that ‘‘intercountry adoption may offer the advantage of a permanent family to a child for whom a suitable 

family cannot be found in his or her State of origin’’; 

Whereas intercountry adoption offers the hope of a permanent family for children who are orphaned or abandoned 

by their biological parents; 

Whereas UNICEF’s official position on intercountry adoption, in pertinent part, states: ‘‘For children who cannot 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
3 

SRES 359 ATS 

be raised by their own families, an appropriate alternative family environment should be sought in preference 

to institutional care, which should be used only as a last 

resort and as a temporary measure. Inter-country adoption is one of a range of care options which may be open 

to children, and for individual children who cannot be 

placed in a permanent family setting in their countries of 

origin, it may indeed be the best solution. In each case, 

the best interests of the individual child must be the 

guiding principal in making a decision regarding adoption.’’; 

Whereas unsubstantiated allegations have been made about 

the fate of children adopted from Romania and the qualifications and motives of those who adopt internationally; 

Whereas in June 2001, the Romanian Adoption Committee 

imposed a moratorium on intercountry adoption, but continued to accept new intercountry adoption applications 

and allowed many such applications to be processed 

under an exception for extraordinary circumstances; 

Whereas on June 21, 2004, the Parliament of Romania enacted Law 272/2004 on ‘‘the protection and promotion of 

the rights of the child’’, which creates new requirements 

for declaring a child legally available for adoption; 

Whereas on June 21, 2004, the Parliament of Romania enacted Law 273/2004 on adoption, which prohibits intercountry adoption except by a child’s biological grandparent or grandparents; 

Whereas there is no European Union law or regulation restricting intercountry adoptions to biological grandparents or requiring that restrictive laws be passed as a 

prerequisite for accession to the European Union; 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
4 

SRES 359 ATS 

Whereas the number of Romanian children adopted domestically is far less than the number abandoned and has declined further since enactment of Law 272/2004 and 273/ 

2004 due to new, overly burdensome requirements for 

adoption; 

Whereas prior to enactment of Law 273/2004, 211 intercountry adoption cases were pending with the Government of Romania in which children had been matched 

with adoptive parents in the United States, and approximately 1,500 cases were pending in which children had 

been matched with prospective parents in Western Europe; and 

Whereas the children of Romania, and all children, deserve 

to be raised in permanent families: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) supports the desire of the Government of 

3 Romania to improve the standard of care and well4 being of children in Romania; 

5 (2) urges the Government of Romania to com6 plete the processing of the intercountry adoption 

7 cases which were pending when Law 273/2004 was 

8 enacted; 

9 (3) urges the Government of Romania to amend 

10 its child welfare and adoption laws to decrease bar11 riers to adoption, both domestic and intercountry, 

12 including by allowing intercountry adoption by per13 sons other than biological grandparents; 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
5 

SRES 359 ATS 

1 (4) urges the Secretary of State and the Ad2 ministrator of the United States Agency for Inter3 national Development to work collaboratively with 

4 the Government of Romania to achieve these ends; 

5 and 

6 (5) requests that the European Union and its 

7 member states not impede the Government of Roma8 nia’s efforts to place orphaned or abandoned chil9 dren in permanent homes in a manner that is con10 sistent with Romania’s obligations under the Hague 

11 Convention on Protection of Children and Co-oper12 ation in Respect of Intercountry Adoption. 

Æ 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS