alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 520 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 520

     To authorize the production of records, testimony, and legal 
                            representation.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 23, 2006

     Mr. Frist (for himself and Mr. Reid) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
     To authorize the production of records, testimony, and legal 
                            representation.

Whereas the United States Department of Justice is conducting an investigation 
        into improper activities by lobbyists and related matters;
Whereas the Committee on Indian Affairs and the Committee on Rules and 
        Administration have received specific requests from the Department of 
        Justice for records that may be relevant for use in the investigation;
Whereas, pursuant to sections 703(a) and 704(a)(2) of the Ethics in Government 
        Act of 1978, 2 U.S.C. 288b(a) and 288c(a)(2), the Senate may direct 
        its counsel to represent employees of the Senate with respect to any 
        subpoena, order, or request for testimony relating to their official 
        responsibilities;
Whereas, by the privileges of the Senate of the United States and rule XI of the 
        Standing Rules of the Senate, no evidence under the control or in the 
        possession of the Senate can, by administrative or judicial process, be 
        taken from such control or possession but by permission of the Senate; 
        and
Whereas, when it appears that evidence under the control or in the possession of 
        the Senate is needed for the promotion of justice, the Senate will take 
        such action as will promote the ends of justice consistent with the 
        privileges of the Senate: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved,  That the Committee on Indian Affairs and the Committee 
on Rules and Administration are authorized to provide to the U.S. 
Department of Justice the specific documents that have been requested 
by the Department of Justice to date for use in legal and investigatory 
proceedings, and to provide related testimony from their staffs, if 
necessary, except where a privilege should be asserted.
    Sec. 2. The Senate Legal Counsel is authorized to represent 
employees of the Committee on Indian Affairs and the Committee on Rules 
and Administration in connection with the document production and 
testimony authorized in section one of this resolution.
                                 <all>
```
USGSHomeContactUSGSSearchUSGS

USGS-NPS-NASA EAARLTopography

----

Toview a tile as a PDFfile, download a free copy of Adobe Reader:  

AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPoliciesand Notices

U.S.Department of the Interior | U.S.Geological SurveyURL: *http://pubsdata.usgs.gov/pubs/of/2007/1178/start.html*For more information, contact: FeedbackMaintained by Publishing Service Center Page Last Modified: Wednesday, 07-Dec-2016 20:41:23 EST

----
Exhibit 34.2

 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Management of C-III Asset Management LLC:

We have examined management of C-III Asset Management LLC’s (the “Company”) assertion that the Company complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB for all transactions for which the Company acted as servicer involving first lien commercial mortgage loans (the “Platform”), excluding criteria 1122(d)(1)(iii), 1122(d)(2)(ii), 1122(d)(3)(i) – 1122(d)(3)(iv), 1122(d)(4)(ii), 1122(d)(4)(v), 1122(d)(4)(ix) and 1122(d)(4)(xv), which management has determined are not applicable to the activities performed by the Company with respect to the Platform, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Assessment of Compliance with Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB Servicing Criteria dated February 10, 2020 as of and for the year ended December 31, 2019. The Company’s management is responsible for its assertion. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assertion about the Company’s compliance with the specified requirements based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the examination to obtain reasonable assurance about whether management’s assertion about compliance with the specified requirements is fairly stated, in all material respects. An examination involves performing procedures to obtain evidence about whether management’s assertion is fairly stated, in all material respects. The nature, timing, and extent of the procedures selected depend on our judgment, including an assessment of the risks of material misstatement of management’s assertion, whether due to fraud or error. We believe that the evidence we obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance with the specified requirements.

In our opinion, management’s assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Assessment of Compliance with Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB Servicing Criteria dated February 10, 2020 as of and for the year ended December 31, 2019 is fairly stated, in all material respects.

Asheville, North Carolina February 10, 2020
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

__________________

NO. 09-22-00267-CR

__________________

REGINALD DCHEIN SAMPSON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

__________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 435th District Court

Montgomery County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 18-10-14214-CR

__________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On October 3, 2022, we notified the parties that the appeal would be dismissed 

for want of prosecution unless arrangements were made for filing the record or the 

appellant explained why he needed additional time for filing the record. The 

appellant did not file a response. It appears that the appellant is not entitled to 

proceed without payment of costs. See Tex. R. App. P. 20.2. There being no 

satisfactory explanation for the failure to file the record, the appeal is dismissed for 

want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b).
2

APPEAL DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM

Submitted on November 29, 2022

Opinion Delivered November 30, 2022

Do Not Publish

Before Golemon, C.J., Kreger and Johnson, JJ.
Exhibit 10.1


 





 


Dear Mr. Yixuan (Adam) Sun:


 


We are very pleased that you have accepted to join our Board of Directors
as an independent director, Chairperson of the Board’s audit committee, and a member of the Board’s nominating and corporate
governance committee and compensation committee as of April 15, 2022.


 


We have been working hard to bring seasoned and
experienced professionals to our Board of Directors, and we are excited to welcome your knowledge and experience. We feel that you will
be a great asset to our team and contribute to our plans.


 


This is to confirm our understanding that you
will receive an annual director fee of RMB 96,000 (approximately USD $15,000) in cash, payable monthly (RMB 8,000 per month) as cash compensation
for services rendered to us. You will be reimbursed for any reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with activities on
our behalf and performance of your duties.


 


Please confirm your acceptance by signing below
and we will get the appropriate paperwork in order. We will provide as much advance notice to you as possible in connection with any meetings
of the Board of Directors that we have.


 


Please feel free to call me if you have any questions.
I look forward to a successful and exciting relationship.


 


QILIAN INTERNATIONAL HOLDING GROUP LIMITED


 


	By:	/s/ Zhanchang Xin	 
	Name:	Zhanchang Xin	 
	Title:	Chief Executive Officer	 


 


	By:	/s/ Yixuan (Adam) Sun	 
	Name:	Yixuan (Adam) Sun
Sanitized

1
Sanitized

2
Sanitized

3
1 In The



### Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

__________________
N O . 09

- 24

- 00100

- CV

__________________

IN RE VIKOR SCIENTIFIC, LLC

__________________________________________________________________ Original Proceeding 457th District Court of Montgomery County, Texas Trial Cause No. 23

- 09

- 14105

- CV

__________________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION

On Jul y 15 , 2024, Relator Vikor Scientific, LLC filed an agre ed motion to

dismiss this mandamus proceeding. Relator informs the Court that the parties have

resolved the merits o f the ir underlying dispute in a settlement agreement . We grant

the mot ion and dismiss this original proceeding without reference to the merits.

PETITION DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM

Submitted on April 8, 2024 Opinion Delivered July 25, 2024

Before Golemon , C.J., Wright and Chambers, JJ.
No. 43068.

#### Protests 987316-G, etc., of R. U. Delapenha & Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of Abstract 41762 the protests were sustained.
Case: 2:12-cv-01183-EAS-EPD Doc #: 56 Filed: 11/15/13 Page: 1 of 1  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-12T13:30:02-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF  THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, James H. Perry, as Chief Financial Officer of United Industrial Corporation (the “Company”) certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

|   | a.     | the   accompanying Form 10-Q report for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed   with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”) fully   complies with the requirements of Section 13a or 15(d) of the Securities   Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 |
|   | b.     | the   information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material   respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                                                                                             |

Date: August 6, 2004

| /s/ JAMES H. PERRY        |   |
|---------------------------|--------|
|                           |   |
| James H.   Perry          |   |
| Chief   Financial Officer |   |
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

November 9, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 05-50664

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

OSCAR DANIEL CISNEROS-LOPEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 3:04-CR-2447-ALL

--------------------

Before REAVLEY, GARZA, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Oscar Daniel

Cisneros-Lopez raises arguments that are foreclosed by

Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998),

which held that a prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 

8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense. The

Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the

judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA

Present: Judges Humphreys, McCl anahan and Senior Judge Bumgardner Argued by teleconference

COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA MEMORANDUM OPINION * BY v. Record No. 2551-07-2 JUDGE ELIZABETH A. McCLANAHAN MARCH 18, 2008 PAIGE ELIZABETH ANDERSON

FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND Beverly W. Snukals, Judge Karen Misbach, Assistant Attorn ey General (Robert F. McDonnell, Attorney General, on brief), for appellant. Patrick D. Kelley for appellee.

The Commonwealth appeals an order of the trial court granting Paige Elizabeth Anderson’s motion to suppress evid ence. Appellee stands indicted in the Circuit Court of the City of Richmond for possession of marijuana with the intent to di stribute in viol ation of Code § 18.2-248.1. The charge arose out of the seizure of a knotted plastic baggie of marijuana from Anderson’s purse, which was located in her vehi cle. The circuit court granted Anderson’s motion to suppress and ruled that the marijuan a, located in the ba ggie and recovered from Anderson’s purse in the vehicle, was obtained in viol ation of the Fourth Amendment of the

United States Constitution. In reviewing the trial court’s decision on Anderson’s motion to suppress evidence, we

consider the evidence and all reasonable inferences flowing from that evidence in the light most favorable to Anderson, the prevailing party. Jackson v. Commonwealth , 267 Va. 666, 672, 594

* Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opin ion is not designated for publication.- 2 - S.E.2d 595, 598 (2004). “[T]he burden is upon [the Commonwealth, the losi ng party below,] to show that the ruling, when the evidence is considered most favorably to [Anderson, the prevailing party below], consti tuted reversible error.” Lovelace v. Commonwealth , 37 Va. App. 120, 124, 554 S.E.2d 688, 689 (2001) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted). Considering the totality of the circumstances and viewing the eviden ce and all reasonable inferences flowing from the evid ence in the light most favorable to Anderson, we agree with the

trial court’s conclusion that Grandison v. Commonwealth , 274 Va. 316, 645 S.E.2d 298 (2007), controls the outcome of the case, and consis tent therewith, the evidence did not establish probable cause to believe ther e was marijuana inside the ba ggie in Anderson’s purse. See also

Brown v. Commonwealth , 270 Va. 414, 421, 620 S.E.2d 760, 763 (2005). For these reasons, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.

Affirmed.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

Cynthia Babione,

Plaintiff

 v.

JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.,

Defendant

:

:

:

:

:

Civil Action 2:12-cv-0555

Judge Graham

Magistrate Judge Abel

Order Cancelling Settlement Week Mediation

The March 8, 2013 joint motion of the parties to cancel the Settlement Week mediation noticed for March 14, 2013 at 3:00 p.m. be cancelled (doc. 14) is GRANTED. The

parties are negotiating a resolution of this lawsuit. They anticipate filing a stipulation

dismissing this lawsuit within 60 days. The March 2013 Settlement Week mediation is

CANCELLED. 

If this case is not then dismissed, counsel are DIRECTED to call me (614-719-3370)

on or before May 22, 2013 to set up a telephone conference to let me know the status of

their clients finalizing their settlement.

The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to serve a copy of this Order on counsel and the

Settlement Week Mediator Thomas Tyack, 536 S. High St., Columbus, OH 43215.

s/Mark R. Abel 

United States Magistrate Judge

Case: 2:12-cv-00555-JLG-MRA Doc #: 15 Filed: 03/11/13 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Andrew
Kang, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period
covered by this report on Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2016-1 (the Exchange Act periodic reports);

2.
Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution,
servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except
as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this
report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Wells Fargo
Bank, National Association.



By:

/s/ Andrew KangName:

Andrew KangTitle:

President and Chief Executive OfficerSantander Drive Auto Receivables LLC, as Depositor(senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)Date:

March 30, 2017
# Official Journal L 65/2011

| | ISSN 1725-2555
  doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2011.065.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 65 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5411 March 2011 |

ISSN 1725-2555

doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2011.065.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 65

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5411 March 2011

---

| Contents | | I   Legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Regulation (EU) No 211/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 2011 on the citizens’ initiative | 1 |

Contents

I   Legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Regulation (EU) No 211/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 2011 on the citizens’ initiative

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
No. 39024.

#### Protests 497843-G, etc., of A. A. Vantine & Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists ■of incense burners chiefly used in the household for utilitarian purposes. The claim as household utensils at 40 percent under paragraph 339 was sustained on the authority of *United States*v. *Friedlaender*(21 C. C. P. A. 103, T. D. 46445), and *Dow*v. *United States*(id. 282, T. D. 46816).
No. 56620.

protests 141283-K, etc. (New York).

#### Anco Import Corp. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 80 (Thursday, April 26, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 20865]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-7972]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[FEMA-3274-EM]


Indiana; Amendment No. 2 to Notice of an Emergency Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of an emergency declaration for 
the State of Indiana (FEMA-3274-EM), dated March 12, 2007, and related 
determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: April 17, 2007.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Magda Ruiz, Disaster Assistance 
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, 
(202) 646-2705.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of an emergency declaration for 
the State of Indiana is hereby amended to include the following areas 
among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the 
catastrophe declared an emergency by the President in his declaration 
of March 12, 2007:

    Porter, Steuben, and Wells Counties for emergency protective 
measures (Category B), including snow removal, under the Public 
Assistance program for any continuous 48-hour period during or 
proximate to the incident period.

    (The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, 
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund Program; 97.032, 
Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services Program; 97.034, 
Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management 
Assistance; 97.048, Individuals and Households Housing; 97.049, 
Individuals and Households Disaster Housing Operations; 97.050, 
Individuals and Households Program-Other Needs, 97.036, Public 
Assistance Grants; 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program).

R. David Paulison,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
 [FR Doc. E7-7972 Filed 4-25-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-10-P
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

May 30, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 133053 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 133053 

 COA: 273343 

Calhoun CC: 05-000160-FC 

MILO LORENZO BURTON, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 20, 2006 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

d0521 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

May 30, 2007 

 Clerk