alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Schmid Brothers, Inc., Meadows Wye & Co., Inc. *v.*United States

No. 7564.

Entry No. 753367.

Invoice dated Torquay, England.

Entered at New York, N. Y., April 18, -1946.

(Decided March 10, 1948)

*Lane, Young & Fox (William H. Fox*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Johnson, Judge:

This proceeding has been submitted upon a stipulation wherein the parties hereto have agreed that the issues involved in this reappraisement are the same in all material respects as in the case of *United States*v. *Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp.,*33 C. C. P. A. 183, C. A. D. 334. The record in that case was-admitted as part of the record herein.

In view of the aforesaid stipulation and accepting same as a statement of fact, and in view of the decision cited, I find and hold that the export value of the merchandise is the value found by the appraiser, less any additions on entry by the importer by reason of advances by the appraiser in similar cases to equal the-so-called British purchase tax.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i at e f orpubl i c at i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane lunani m ous l yf i nds thi s c a s e s ui t abl e f

orde c i s i on w i thout ** o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). A P / R es ear ch NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON

UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T L I Z AR DI MAGA L I E S T R AD A, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E RJr ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N os . 04- 76531 05- 72613 A ge nc yN o. A 077- 974- 853 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i ons f

orR e vi e w of

O r de r s of

the B o ar do f I m m ig r atio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d N ove m be r17, 2009 ** B efo re: A L A R C Ó N , T R O T T , an dT A S H IM A , C i rcu i tJu d g es. L i z ar di M a ga l i E s tr a da , ana t i ve and c i t i z e n of G uat e m a l a , pe t i t i ons f

or re vi ew of the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ (“ B IA ”) orders di sm i ss i ng her app ea l f r om an i m m i gr at i on j udge ’ s de c i s i on de ny i ng he rappl i c at i on f orc anc e l l at i on of 

# FI LED DE C 09 2009 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALSA P/ Res ea r ch 04- 76531 2 re m ov aland, up on re consi derat i on , agai n d i sm i ss i ng her app ea l . A s the B IA gr ant e d E s tr a da ’ s m ot i on t o r e c ons i de r , w e di s m i s s the pe t i t i on f orr e vi e w i n N o. 0 4 - 7 6 5 3 1 . See 8 U . S . C . § 1 25 2(a) (1) ( j uri sdi ct i on ov erfi nalorders of re m ov al ). W e have j uri sdi ct i on i n p et i t i on N o. 05 -726 13 un der 8 U . S . C . § 1 25 2. W e r evi ew d e n o v o qu e s tio n s o f

law , G o n z a lez - G o n z a lezv . A s h c ro ft , 3 9 0 F .3 d6 4 9 , 6 5 1 ( 9 th C i r . 2 0 0 4 ) , an dwe d e n yth e p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w. T he B I A pr ope r l yc onc l ude d thatE s tr a dai s s t atut or i l yi ne l i gi bl e f or c an c e llatio n o f

r e m o v a l b a s e do n h e rc o n v ic tio n f o rac r im e o f

d o m e s tic v io le n c e . See 8 U .S .C . § § 1 2 2 9 b ( b ) ( 1 ) ( C ) ; 1 2 2 7 ( a ) ( 2 ) ( E ) ( i) ; se e al so G on zalez -G on zalez , 390 F . 3d at651- 53. E s tr a da ’ s c ont e nt i on thats he i s e l i gi bl e f orc anc e l l at i on b e c au s e h e rc o n v ic tio n is n o t ac r im e in v o lv in g m o r a l tu rp itu d e is in ap p o s ite . M o r e o v e r , h e rc o n te n tio n th at th e p e ttyo f f e n s e e x c e p tio n ap p lie s in h e rc a s e is u n av a ilin g . See C ise rnos-P erezv. G on zales , 465 F . 3d 386, 390 ( 9th C i r . 2006) (petty off

ense exce pt i on do es no tappl y t o cri m es of do m es t i c vi ol ence ). No . 0 4 - 7 6 5 3 1 : P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DI S MI S S E D. No . 0 5 - 7 2 6 1 3 : P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-2565

GEORGE REYNOLD EVANS, SR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

DAVID GODWIN,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Chief

District Judge. (CA-96-138-7-F)

Submitted: January 23, 1997 Decided: January 31, 1997

Before RUSSELL, WILKINS, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

George Reynold Evans, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's orders denying relief

on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint and on his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court's

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the

reasoning of the district court. Evans v. Godwin, No. CA-96-138-7-F

(E.D.N.C. Oct. 21, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
```

[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 79 (Wednesday, April 25, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 20570]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-7835]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meeting

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities 
and Exchange Commission will hold the following meeting during the week 
of April 23, 2007:
    A Closed Meeting will be held on Thursday, April 26, 2007 at 2 p.m.
    Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the 
Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the Closed Meeting. 
Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters may also be 
present.
    The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has 
certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth 
in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (7), (9)(B), and (10) and 17 CFR 
200.402(a)(3), (5), (7), 9(ii) and (10), permit consideration of the 
scheduled matters at the Closed Meeting.
    Commissioner Atkins, as duty officer, voted to consider the items 
listed for the closed meeting in closed session.
    The subject matter of the Closed Meeting scheduled for Thursday, 
April 26, 2007 will be:

    Formal orders of investigations;
    Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;
    Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings of an 
enforcement nature;
    Litigation matters; and
    Other matters related to enforcement proceedings.

    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in 
the scheduling of meeting items.
    For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have 
been added, deleted or postponed, please contact: The Office of the 
Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

    Dated: April 19, 2007.
J. Lynn Taylor,
Assistant Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E7-7835 Filed 4-24-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P
```
Schlemmer, Kevin (OST) 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Cc: 

Subject: 

Good Morning Kevin I Scott, 

Chuck Howell <chowell@flygreatlakes.com> 

Thursday, "March 26, 2015 1:01 PM 

Schlemmer, Kevin (OSD; Faulk, Scott (OSD 

youngj@cityofmerced.org; dvoss@flygreatlakes.com;z/tylike,_!ylatth~ws~ 

Merced revised service proposal •v .J · ·• d - 9 !-' 2: L~ I 

As you know we have been in constant contact with Janet Young, Airport Director in MCE, since the RFP's were 

submitted. 

It is their belief and ours that the right aircraft for the market with service into LAX is the EMB-120- 30 passenger 

aircraft. 

Even though the EMB-120 Brasilia is more expensive and has the added crew member (flight attendant) we along with 

the City of Merced would like to amend our proposal to provide two round-trips a day in the EMB-120 Brasilia 

Into LAX and are offering it for the same compensation requirement as we proposed for the two round-trip Beech craft 

nine seat 1900. 

Annual Compensation Requirement: $2,779,116. 

Please advise how we best move forward. 

Regards, 

Chuck Howell 

)-

-. 

- . 

- .
Exhibit 4.3



Consent of Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm


We have issued our report
dated April 13, 2022, with respect to the financial statement of SmartTrust 562 contained in Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement
on Form S-6 (File No. 333-262210) and related Prospectus. We consent to the use of the aforementioned report in the Registration Statement
and Prospectus, and to the use of our name as it appears under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm”.


 


/s/ Grant
Thornton LLP


 


Chicago, Illinois


April 13, 2022
----

RECRUITMENT FOR THE EUROPEAN MEDICINES AGENCY (LONDON)

(2004/C 237 A/02)

The Agency is responsible for coordinating the evaluation and supervision of medicinal products for human and veterinary use in the European Union (see Council Regulation (EEC) No 2309/93 of 22 July 1993, (Official Journal of the European Communities L 214 of 24 August 1993) and Council Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of 31 March 2004, (Official Journal of the European Union L 136/1 of 30 April 2004, page 1). The EMEA was established in January 1995. It has many close contacts with the European Commission, 25 EU Member States, EEA countries and many other groups in government and the private sector.

Further information on the EMEA and its activities is readily accessible through the Internet; our web address is http://www.emea.eu.int

The European Medicines Agency is organising selection procedures with a view to drawing up reserve lists for:

Selected candidates will be included on a reserve list and, depending on the budgetary situation, may be offered a five-year renewable contract in accordance with the Conditions of employment of other servants of the European Communities (Official Journal of the European Communities L 56 of 4 March 1968) (1).

The place of employment shall be London.

Candidates must be nationals of a Member State of the European Communities, or of Iceland, Norway or Liechtenstein, on condition that they have full rights as a citizen.

The complete conditions, the job descriptions and the necessary application form should be downloaded from the EMEA website http://www.emea.eu.int. The application form must be duly signed and dated and, together with all documentary evidence, must be returned no later than 5 November 2004 (date of postmark) to the following address:EMEA - Head of Personnel, 7 Westferry Circus, Canary Wharf, London E14 4HB, United Kingdom (Tel: (44-207) 418 84 00; fax: (44-207) 418 84 16).

----

(1)  The Council has adopted new Staff Regulations which entered into force on 1 May 2004. These Regulations include a new career structure. Successful candidates would therefore be recruited on the basis of the new Staff Regulations, in accordance with the arrangements set out, in particular, in Article 12 of Section 2 of Annex XIII (see the IntraComm website: http://www.europa.eu.int).

----
Exhibit
4.1


 


DESCRIPTION
OF COMMON STOCK


 


The
following is a brief description of shares of common stock (“common stock”) of Cell Source, Inc. (the “Company,”
“we,” “us,” or “our”). The brief description is based upon our Articles of Incorporation, our Bylaws
(our “Bylaws”), and provisions of applicable Nevada law. This summary does not purport to be complete and is subject to,
and qualified in its entirety by, the full text of our Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws, each of which is incorporated by reference
as an exhibit to our Annual Report on Form 10-K.


 


GENERAL


 


Our
Articles of Incorporation authorizes us to issue up to 200,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share, of which 34,360,546
shares of common were issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2021.


 


COMMON
STOCK


 


Holders
of common stock are entitled to one vote per share on all matters submitted to a vote of the stockholders. Our holders of common stock
do not have cumulative voting rights. Holders of common stock will be entitled to receive ratably such dividends as may be declared by
the Board out of funds legally available therefor, which may be paid in cash, property, or in shares of the Company’s capital stock.
Upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Company, either voluntarily or involuntarily, the holders of common stock will be
entitled to receive their ratable share of the net assets of the Company legally available for distribution after payment of all debts
and other liabilities and distributions with respect to senior securities. There are no conversion, preemptive or other subscription
rights and there are no sinking fund or redemption provisions applicable to the common stock.


 


DIVIDENDS


 


We
have not declared or paid any dividends on our common stock since our inception and do not anticipate paying dividends for the foreseeable
future. The payment of dividends is subject to the discretion of our Board and will depend, among other things, upon our earnings, our
capital requirements, our financial condition, and other relevant factors. We intend to reinvest any earnings in the development and
expansion of our business. Any cash dividends in the future to common stockholders will be payable when, as and if declared by our Board,
based upon the board’s assessment of our financial condition and performance, earnings, need for funds, capital requirements, prior
claims of preferred stock to the extent issued and outstanding, and other factors, including income tax consequences, restrictions and
applicable laws. There can be no assurance, therefore, that any dividends on our common stock will ever be paid.
EXHIBIT 32.1








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, John C. Lawrence, President, and Chief Executive Officer of United States Antimony Corporation (the "Company") do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:





This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ John C. Lawrence

Date:
November 12, 2010John C. LawrencePresident and Chief Executive Officer
----

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4103 — EnBW/SWD)

(2006/C 77/04)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 22 March 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in German and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Office of Personnel Management

# AGENCY:

Office of Personnel Management. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-13, May 22, 1995), this notice announces that the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) has submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) a request for extension of a currently approved information collection. RI 38-115, Representative Payee Survey, is used to collect information about how the benefits paid to a representative payee have been used or conserved for the benefit of the incompetent annuitant. 

Approximately 11,000 RI 38-115 forms are completed annually. The form takes approximately 20 minutes to complete. The annual estimated burden is 3,667 hours. 

                        For copies of this proposal, contact Mary Beth Smith-Toomey on (202) 606-8358, FAX (202) 418-3251 or via E-mail to                         *MaryBeth.Smith-Toomey@opm.gov.*                         Please include a mailing address with your request.                     

# DATES:

Comments on this proposal should be received within 30 calendar days from the date of this publication. 

# ADDRESSES:

Send or deliver comments to—

Pamela S. Israel, Chief, Operations Support Group, Center for Retirement and Insurance Services, U.S. Office of Personnel Management, 1900 E Street, NW., Room 3349, Washington, DC 20415-3540, and 

Brenda Aguilar, OPM Desk Officer, Office of Information & Regulatory Affairs,  Office of Management and Budget, New Executive Office Building, NW., Room 10235, Washington, DC 20503. 

# For Information Regarding Administrative Coordination Contact:

 Cyrus S. Benson, Team Leader, Publications Team, RIS Support Services/Support Group, (202) 606-0623. 

Office of Personnel Management. 

Tricia Hollis, 

Chief of Staff.

 [FR Doc. E7-7825 Filed 4-24-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6325-38-P
III 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 397 

Recognizing the history and achievements of the curling community of 

Bemidji, Minnesota. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 9, 2006 

Mr. COLEMAN (for himself and Mr. DAYTON) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the history and achievements of the curling 

community of Bemidji, Minnesota. 

Whereas the citizens of Bemidji, Minnesota, have enjoyed the 

sport of curling ever since the Hibbing Curling Club demonstrated the sport during the Winter Carnival of 1932; 

Whereas many families who live in Bemidji have participated 

in the sport for over 4 generations, the latest of whom 

enjoy the opportunity to enroll in high school courses 

that are held at the Bemidji Curling Club and focus on 

the fundamentals of curling; 

Whereas members of the Bemidji community gathered at the 

Tourist Information Building and organized the now famous Bemidji Curling Club on January 13, 1935; 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
2 

•SRES 397 ATS

Whereas the Club brought the Bemidji community together, 

as members routinely shared their equipment with fellow 

curlers until the Club could afford to purchase a sufficient supply of stones, brooms, and other items; 

Whereas the Bemidji Curling Club has promoted the participation of women in the sport of curling for almost 60 

years; 

Whereas the tireless efforts of parents and fellow members of 

the Club have inspired a large number of youths in the 

Bemidji community to participate in junior leagues; 

Whereas teams belonging to the Bemidji Curling Club have 

won over 50 State and national titles; 

Whereas, after producing generations of champion curlers, 

the City of Bemidji, the Bemidji Curling Club, and the 

town of Chisolm have the honor of calling themselves the 

home of the 2006 United States Men’s and Women’s 

Olympic Curling Teams; 

Whereas the citizens of Bemidji and Chisolm celebrated the 

strong performances of each Olympic curling team, and 

watched with pride as the Men’s Olympic Curling Team 

captured the bronze medal in Torino; and 

Whereas the Bemidji Curling Club and the City of Bemidji 

continues to foster the growth and development of curling 

by hosting the United States World Team Trials in 

March of 2006: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) recognizes the curling community of 

3 Bemidji for its efforts in promoting the sport of 

4 curling in Minnesota and the United States; and 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
3 

•SRES 397 ATS

1 (2) respectfully requests the Enrolling Clerk of 

2 the Senate to transmit an enrolled copy of this reso3 lution to— 

4 (A) the City of Bemidji; and 

5 (B) the Bemidji Curling Club. 

Æ 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
#### F. C. Gerlach & Co. et al. *v.*United States

No. 6724.

Entry No. 732964, etc.

Invoices dated Stoke on Trent, England, December 1945, etc^

Certified December 14, 1945, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., January 14, 1946, etc..

(Decided January 8, 1947)

*B. A. Levett*for the plaintiffs.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Keefe, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto: ■'

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper; basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importers op entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without **

oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

AP/Research

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LIZARDI MAGALI ESTRADA,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

Nos. 04-76531

 05-72613

Agency No. A077-974-853

MEMORANDUM *

On Petitions for Review of Orders of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted November 17, 2009** 

Before: ALARCÓN, TROTT, and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.

Lizardi Magali Estrada, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) orders dismissing her appeal

from an immigration judge’s decision denying her application for cancellation of

FILED

DEC 09 2009

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
AP/Research 2 04-76531

removal and, upon reconsideration, again dismissing her appeal. As the BIA

granted Estrada’s motion to reconsider, we dismiss the petition for review in No.

04-76531. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(1) (jurisdiction over final orders of removal).

We have jurisdiction in petition No. 05-72613 under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review

de novo questions of law, Gonzalez-Gonzalez v. Ashcroft, 390 F.3d 649, 651 (9th

Cir. 2004), and we deny the petition for review.

The BIA properly concluded that Estrada is statutorily ineligible for

cancellation of removal based on her conviction for a crime of domestic violence. 

See 8 U.S.C. §§ 1229b(b)(1)(C); 1227(a)(2)(E)(i); see also Gonzalez-Gonzalez,

390 F.3d at 651-53. Estrada’s contention that she is eligible for cancellation

because her conviction is not a crime involving moral turpitude is inapposite. 

Moreover, her contention that the petty offense exception applies in her case is

unavailing. See Cisernos-Perez v. Gonzales, 465 F.3d 386, 390 (9th Cir. 2006)

(petty offense exception does not apply to crimes of domestic violence).

No. 04-76531: PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.

No. 05-72613: PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.