alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-4036

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus DEANN HOLLOWAY, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Spartanburg. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (CR-01-670) Submitted: May 12, 2005 Decided: May 17, 2005 Before TRAXLER, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. David W. Plowden, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellant. Jonathan Scott Gasser, Acting United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, William Corley Lucius, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Deann Holloway appeals the district court’s judgment revoking a probation sentence on her conviction for conspiring to defraud the United States in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371 (2000), and resentencing her to ten months in prison followed by two years of supervised release. Holloway’s attorney has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), asserting there are no meritorious legal issues but arguing the district court abused its discretion. Holloway has been informed of her right to file a pro se supplemental brief but has not done so. We review a district court’s judgment revoking a probation sentence for abuse of discretion. Burns v. United States , 287 U.S. 216, 222 (1932). Upon finding a probation violation, the district court may revoke probation and resentence the defendant to any sentence within the statutory maximum for the original offense. 18 U.S.C. § 3565(a) (2000); United States v. Schaefer , 120 F.3d 505, 507 (4th Cir. 1997). Holloway’s sentence fell within the guidelines range of 4-10 months and was clearly below the five year statutory maximum. Thus, we find the district court did not abuse its discretion. In accordance with Anders , we have reviewed the entire record in this case and have found no meritorious issues for appeal. We, therefore, affirm the district court’s judgment. This court requires that counsel inform his client, in writing, of her- 3 - right to petition the Supreme Court of the United States for further review. If the client requests that a petition be filed, but counsel believes that such a petition would be frivolous, then counsel may move in this court for leave to withdraw from representation. Counsel’s motion must state that a copy thereof was served on the client. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decision process.

AFFIRMED
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7423

DAVID M. GARCIA, Petitioner - Appellant, versusSTATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; CHARLES CONDON, Attorney General of the State of South Carolina, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CA-97-1374-3-17BC) Submitted: February 11, 1999 Decided: February 24, 1999 Before ERVIN, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. David M. Garcia, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58 and 79(a), the orders from which Garcia appeals were entered on the district court’s docket August 7 and September 8, 1998. See Wilson v. Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986). 2 PER CURIAM: David M. Garcia seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998) and his motion to reconsider. We have reviewedthe record and the district court’s opinion, accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation, and the order denying reconsideration and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Garcia’s motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Garcia v. South Carolina , No. CA-97-1374-3-17BC (D.S.C. Aug . 7 & Sept. 8, 1998). * We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
# Official Journal C 172A/25 J

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 172A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4925 July 2006 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 172A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4925 July 2006

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | |
| 2006/C 172A/1 | | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

2006/C 172A/1

1

---

| | III   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) |
| 2006/C 172A/2 | Notices of open competitions EPSO/AD/53-62/06 to constitute a reserve of administrators (AD5) with Cypriot, Czech, Estonian, Hungarian, Lithuanian, Latvian, Maltese, Polish, Slovene or Slovak citizenship in the fields of European public administration, Law, Economics, Microeconomics/Business administration. | 3 |
| 2006/C 172A/3 | Notices of open competitions EPSO/AST/16-25/06 to constitute a reserve of assistants (AST1) with Cypriot, Czech, Estonian, Hungarian, Lithuanian, Latvian, Maltese, Polish, Slovene and Slovak citizenship in the secretarial field. | 24 |

III   Notices

European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO)

2006/C 172A/2

Notices of open competitions EPSO/AD/53-62/06 to constitute a reserve of administrators (AD5) with Cypriot, Czech, Estonian, Hungarian, Lithuanian, Latvian, Maltese, Polish, Slovene or Slovak citizenship in the fields of European public administration, Law, Economics, Microeconomics/Business administration.

EPSO/AD/53-62/06

(AD5)

3

2006/C 172A/3

Notices of open competitions EPSO/AST/16-25/06 to constitute a reserve of assistants (AST1) with Cypriot, Czech, Estonian, Hungarian, Lithuanian, Latvian, Maltese, Polish, Slovene and Slovak citizenship in the secretarial field.

EPSO/AST/16-25/06

(AST1)

24

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l unani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). N H Y / R es ear ch NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON

UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T J AI RO ALVA RE Z, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E RJ r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 06- 72177 A ge nc yN o. A 070- 785- 083 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

an O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d D e c e m be r15, 2009 ** B efo re: G O O D W IN , W A L L A C E , an dF IS H E R , C i rcu i tJu d g es. J a i r o A l var e z , ana t i ve and c i t i z e n of G ua t e m a l a , pe t i t i ons f

orr e vi e w of

the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ (“ B IA ”) order di sm i ss i ng hi s app ea l fr om an i m m i gr a t i on j udge ’ s or de rde ny i ng hi s m ot i on t o r e ope n i n or de rt o appl yf or 

# FI LED DE C 30 2009 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALSN H Y / Res ea r ch 06- 72177 2 a dj us tm e ntof

s t a tus . W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on unde r8 U . S . C . § 1252. R e vi e w i ng f or ab u s e o f d is c r e tio n , Si n gh v . I

NS , 2 9 5 F .3 d1 0 3 7 , 1 0 3 9 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 2 ) , w e d e n yin p art an dd is m is s in p art th e p e titio n f o rr e v ie w . T h e a g e n c yd idn o t ab u s e its d is c r e tio n b yd e n y in g A lv ar e z ’s m o tio n to r e o p e n , b e c au s e th e a g e n c yc o n s id e r e dth e e v id e n c e h e s ub m itte dan da c te dw ith in its b r o a dd is c r e tio n in d e te rm in in g th a t r e o p e n in g w a s n o t w arr an te d . Se e id . at 1 0 3 9 (T h e B IA ’ s d en i al o f a m o t i o n t o reo p en sh al l b e rev ersedi f i ti s “ arb i trary, i rr at i on al , or contraryt o l aw . ”) . W e l a c k j ur i s di c t i on t o r e vi e w the a ge nc y ’ s de c i s i on nott o i nvoke i t s s ua s p o n te au th o r ityto r e o p e n p r o c e e d in g s u n d e r8 C .F .R . § 1 0 0 3 .2 ( a ) . See Ekim i an v. I NS , 3 0 3 F .3 d1 1 5 3 , 1 1 5 9 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 2 ) . P E T IT IO N F O R R E V IE W D E N IE D i n p art; D IS M IS S E D i n p art.
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1662/2006

of 6 November 2006         

amending Regulation (EC) No 853/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down specific hygiene rules for food of animal origin

(Text with EEA relevance)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 853/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 laying down specific hygiene rules for food of animal origin (1), and in particular Article 10(1) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Regulation (EC) No 853/2004 is amended as follows:

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the seventh day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 6 November 2006.

For the Commission

Markos KYPRIANOU            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 139, 30.4.2004, p. 55, as corrected by OJ L 226, 25.6.2004, p. 22. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 2076/2005 (OJ L 338, 22.12.2005, p. 83).

----

ANNEX I

Section I, Part A, point (2) of Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 853/2004 is replaced by the following:

----

ANNEX II

Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 853/2004 is amended as follows:

----

(1)  Council Directive 64/432/EEC of 26 June 1964 on animal health problems affecting intra-Community trade in bovine animals and swine (OJ 121, 29.7.1964, p. 1977/64). Directive as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 21/2004 (OJ L 5, 9.1.2004, p. 8).

(2)  Council Directive 91/68/EEC of 28 January 1991 on animal health conditions governing intra-Community trade in ovine and caprine animals (OJ L 46, 19.2.1991, p. 19). Directive as last amended by Commission Decision 2005/932/EC.

(3)OJ L 123, 24.4.1998, p. 1. Directive as last amended by Commission Directive 2006/50/EC (OJ L 142, 30.5.2006, p. 6).

(*1)  Rolling geometric average over a two-month period, with at least two samples per month.

(*2)  Rolling geometric average over a three-month period, with at least one sample per month, unless the competent authority specifies another methodology to take account of seasonal variations in production levels.

(*3)  Rolling geometric average over a two-month period, with at least two samples per month.

(*4)  Rolling geometric average over a two-month period, with at least two samples per month.

(4)  Council Regulation (EEC) No 2377/90 of 26 June 1990 laying down a Community procedure for the establishment of maximum residue limits of veterinary medicinal products in foodstuffs of animal origin (OJ L 224, 18.8.1990, p. 1). Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1231/2006 (OJ L 225, 17.8.2006, p. 3).’         

----
[4910-13-P]

- I

'"

.~

left and right wings between wing rib numbers 8 (wing station 387) and 9 (wing station

777-200LR and -300ER series airplanes. This AD requires doing a high frequency eddy

414.5), and related investigative and corrective actions if necessary. This AD results fro

reports of cracks emanating from the keyway of the fuel tank access door cutout of the

current inspection for cracking of the keyway of the fuel tank access door cutout on the

Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

Federal Aviation Administration

Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Model 777-200LR and -300ER Serie

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain Model

(Docket Np. FAA-lOID-Ol80; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-259-AD; Amendmen

Ilc33'1

39-**; AD **) ;I.DID- I:' - 03

RIN 2120-AA64

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

14 CFR Part 39

lower wing skin between wing rib numbers 8 and 9. We are issuing this AD to prevent

UTl>'G ~YMIlOL

loss ofthe lower wing skin load path, which could cause catastrophic structural failure

NITIAW;I~I()

the wing.

DATES: This AD is effective [INSERT DATE 35 DAYS AFTER DATE OF

PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER].

The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference of n:

certain publication listed in the AD as of [INSERT DATE 35 DAYS AFTER DATE 0

PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER]. .~

ADDRESSES: For senrice information identified in this AD, contact Boeing

Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management, P. O. Box 3707, Me
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

United States of America

v. 2:13-cr-226

Melissa R. Kincaid 

ORDER

There being no objections, the court hereby adopts the Report

and Recommendation of the magistrate judge (Doc. 16) that the

defendant’s guilty plea be accepted. The court accepts the

defendant’s plea of guilty to Count 1 of the indictment, and she is

hereby adjudged guilty on that count. The court will defer the

decision of whether to accept the plea agreement until the

sentencing hearing.

Date: January 10, 2014 s\James L. Graham 

 James L. Graham

 United States District Judge

Case: 2:13-cr-00226-JLG-EPD Doc #: 18 Filed: 01/10/14 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
# Official Journal C 57A/2012

| | ISSN 1977-091X
  doi:10.3000/1977091X.CA2012.057.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 57A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5525 February 2012 |

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.CA2012.057.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 57A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5525 February 2012

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2012/C 057A/01 | Common catalogue of varieties of vegetable species — second supplement to the 30th complete edition | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2012/C 057A/01

Common catalogue of varieties of vegetable species — second supplement to the 30th complete edition

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
# Official Journal L 93/2020

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 93 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6327 March 2020 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 93

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6327 March 2020

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | ACTS ADOPTED BY BODIES CREATED BY INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS |
| | * | Decision No 1/2020 of the EPA Committee of 14 January 2020 amending certain provisions of Protocol 1 concerning the definition of the concept of ‘originating products’ and methods of administrative cooperation to the Interim Agreement establishing a framework for an Economic Partnership Agreement between the Eastern and Southern Africa States, on the one part, and the European Community and its Member States, on the other part [2020/425] | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

ACTS ADOPTED BY BODIES CREATED BY INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS

*

Decision No 1/2020 of the EPA Committee of 14 January 2020 amending certain provisions of Protocol 1 concerning the definition of the concept of ‘originating products’ and methods of administrative cooperation to the Interim Agreement establishing a framework for an Economic Partnership Agreement between the Eastern and Southern Africa States, on the one part, and the European Community and its Member States, on the other part [2020/425]

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
III 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 389 

Recognizing and honoring the 150th anniversary of the founding of the 

Sigma Alpha Epsilon Fraternity. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 3, 2006 

Mr. ISAKSON (for himself, Mr. BAUCUS, Mr. PRYOR, Mr. SUNUNU, Mr. 

DOMENICI, and Mr. FRIST) submitted the following concurrent resolution; 

which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing and honoring the 150th anniversary of the 

founding of the Sigma Alpha Epsilon Fraternity. 

Whereas the Sigma Alpha Epsilon Fraternity was founded on 

March 9, 1856, by 8 young men at the University of Alabama in Tuscaloosa, Alabama, in order to establish a 

band of brothers; 

Whereas the founders of the fraternity believed in promoting 

the intellectual, moral, and spiritual welfare of their 

members; 

Whereas the mission of the Sigma Alpha Epsilon Fraternity 

is to promote the highest standards of friendship, scholarship, and service for its members; 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 389 ATS

Whereas the Sigma Alpha Epsilon Fraternity adheres to its 

creed known as ‘‘The True Gentleman’’ and lives up to 

its ideals and aspirations for conduct with fellow man; 

Whereas, for 150 years, the Sigma Alpha Epsilon Fraternity 

has played an integral role in the positive development of 

the character and education of more than 280,000 men; 

Whereas the brothers of Sigma Alpha Epsilon, being from 

different backgrounds, ethnic groups, and temperaments, 

have shared countless friendships and a common belief in 

the founding ideals of the fraternity; 

Whereas tens of thousands of Sigma Alpha Epsilon men have 

served our nation’s military and hundreds have given the 

ultimate sacrifice for our freedom; 

Whereas alumni from Sigma Alpha Epsilon serve as leaders 

in their respective fields, including government, business, 

entertainment, science, and higher education; 

Whereas the Sigma Alpha Epsilon Fraternity has 190,000 

living alumni from as many as 290 chapters at colleges 

and universities in 49 states and Canada, making it the 

largest social fraternity in the world; and 

Whereas Sigma Alpha Epsilon continues to enrich the lives 

of its members who, in turn, give back to their families, 

communities, and other service groups: Now, therefore, 

be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) recognizes and honors the 150th anniver3 sary of the founding of the Sigma Alpha Epsilon 

4 Fraternity; 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
3 

•SRES 389 ATS

1 (2) commends its founding fathers and all 

2 Sigma Alpha Epsilon brothers, past and present, for 

3 their bond of friendship, common ideals and beliefs, 

4 and service to community; and 

5 (3) expresses its best wishes to this most re6 spected and cherished of national fraternities for 

7 continued success and growth. 

Æ 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
## CAUSE 

# NUMBER

03-15-00318-CR 

## JAMAAL 

# BRADLEY 

# X IN 

## THE 

# COURT OF 

## APPEALS 

# X V. 

# X TI-HRD 

### DISTRICT 

# X THE STATE OF 

## TEXAS 

# X STATE 

## OF 

## TEXAS APPELLANT’S



# MOTION

TO DISMISS 

## APPEAL TO THE 

# HONORABLE

THIRD 

## COURT OF APPEALS: 

# COMES 

# NOW THE APPELLANT,



## JAMAAL

BRADLEY,

by and through

his appointed

attorney



### of record,

Paul Evans,

in the 

### above

entitled 

### and 

### numbered

cause, 

### and pursuant

to 

### Texas Rules 

### of Appellate

Procedure article

42.2(a), 

### moves

this Court to 

### DISMISS

the appeal

at bar. 

## WHEREFORE,

Appellant

requests

that, after proper

notice

is given to all parties

to this appeal,

the 

### motion

be heard 

### and this Court enter 

### an order dismissing

this appeal. Respectfully submitted, 

## Law Office of Paul 

### M. Evans 811 

### Nueces

Street Austin,



### Texas 78701 

### (512)569-1418 (512)551-1550



## FAX pau1matthewevans@hotmail.com ACCEPTED 03-15-00318-CR 11222327 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS 6/20/2016 10:31:10 AM JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK

# APPROVED AS 

# TO 

# FORM AND CONTENT

Attorney

for Appellant 

### 2003103 BY; ‘ au/v\,Ca.a.j



### 6/ail

' J ' 

### 1Bradley,Appe1la 

## TD #



### 2005200 Coffield

Unit 

### 2661 

# FM 2054 Tennessee

Colony, 

## TX 75884

## CERTIFICATE 

# OF SERVICE
I hereby

certify

that a true 

### and correct 

### copy of the 

### above 

### and foregoing 

### was delivered



### by e-service

facsimile

unto the office 

### of the prosecuting attorney

for the State 

### of Texas———the

Travis 

### County

District

Attorney, mailing

address

P.O. 

### Box 1748, Austin, 

### TX, 78767,

physical

address



### 509 

### W. 11"‘ Street,

Austin, 

### TX, 

### 78701—on

this the Z

### Q day

of

l

# Mb ,2016.
_/s/ Paul 

### M. Evans 

## PAUL M. 

## EVANS CERTIFICATE



## OF 

# COMPLIANCE
I hereby

certify

that the present 

### document

contains



### 254 words,

all contents

included. _/s/ Paul 

### M. Evans 

## PAUL M. 

## EVANS
**AD Economic Evaluation**

Docket No . FAA - 2012 - 0773 Directorate ID : 2009 - SW - 71 - AD Helicopter Model: Eurocopter Deutschland GmbH Model MBB - BK 117 C - 2 Helicopters Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 88 Helicopters in the US Registry . Reason : The proposed actions are intended to detect blind rivets installed in the long tail rotor drive shaft, which could lead to failure of the tail rotor drive shaft and subsequent loss of control of the helicopter. Costs : Parts per Helic opter $4,600 Labor per Helicopter ( 2 x $ 8 5 /work- hour) $ 170 Other (Explain) Total Cost per Helicopter $ 4,770 Total US Fleet Cost $ 419,760, assuming that the long tail rotor drive shaft assembly

would be required to be replaced on the entire fleet. Executive Order 12866 : Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No (  ) DOT Regulatory

Policies and Procedures : Isthe AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No (  ) Regulatory

Flexibility

Act : Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Yes ( ) No (  ) Project Engineer : Jim Grigg