alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Corporate Trust Services**

  MAC R1204-010  9062 Old Annapolis Road  Columbia, MD 21045  Tel: 410 884 2000  Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

Re: Annual Statement ofCompliance for CSAIL 2016-C5 Commercial Mortgage Trust, Commercial MortgagePass-Through Certificates, Series 2016-C5

 

 

Per the Pooling and ServicingAgreement dated as of February 1, 2016 (the "Agreement"), theundersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., asCertificate Administrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies asfollows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2016 (the "ReportingPeriod"):

 

(a) A review of Wells Fargo'sactivities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under theAgreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and

 

(b) To the best of suchofficer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of itsobligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

 

February 27, 2017

 

 

/s/ Brian Smith

BRIAN SMITH

Vice President 

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll  go far |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------|
Exhibit
10.14


 


FIRST
AMENDMENT TO


 


LICENSE,
FUNDING AND OPERATIONAL AGREEMENT


 


THIS
IS THE FIRST AMENDMENT (the “Amendment”) to the License, Funding and Operational Agreement for rabies immunotherapy (the
“Agreement”) between Mid-Atlantic BioTherapeutics, Inc. (“Licensor”) and Curative Biotechnology, Inc., formerly
Connectyx, (“Licensee”) originally executed September 30th, 2020.


 


WITNESSETH:


 


WHEREAS,
the Licensor and Licensee have executed the Agreement referred to above;


 


and


 


WHEREAS,
in the Agreement Sections 8 and 12 refer to the obligation of Licensee to raise money to fund the rabies immunotherapy program and also
includes a termination date if a minimum amount of money has not been raised; and


 


WHEREAS,
the method and timing for raising that money has changed and the parties wish to update the Agreement to reflect that;


 


WHEREAS,
the Licensor and Licensee wish to amend the Agreement as set forth herein,


 


NOW,
THEREFORE, Licensor and Licensee amend the Agreement as follows:


 


8.
Project Funding. Section 8 is amended to state that all obligations of the Licensor shall be contingent upon Licensee raising at least
$6.5 million dollars within 180 days of Licensee’s S1 going effective.


 


12.
Term and Termination. The termination date of December 31, 2020, is amended to March 30, 2022.


 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this First Amendment this 30thth day of December, 2021.


 


	LICENSOR	 	LICENSEE
	 	 	 
	Mid-Atlantic
    BioTherapeutics, Inc.	 	Curative
    Biotechnology, Inc.
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	By:	David
    Horn, M.D.	 	Richard
    Garr
EXHIBIT 32.2
------------

                              UNITED-GUARDIAN, INC.
                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

        In  connection  with the Annual  Report of  United-Guardian,  Inc.  (the
"Company") on  Form  10-KSB  for the year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Kenneth H. Globus,  President  and  Chief  Financial  Officer  of  the  Company,
hereby  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  section  1350,  as adopted  pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

        (1) the Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)the  information  contained  in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


Date:  May 6, 2005                        /s/ Kenneth H. Globus
                                          --------------------------
                                          Kenneth H. Globus
                                          President and Chief Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-8051

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

HUGH EPPS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District 

Judge. (3:07-cr-00420-JRS-1)

Submitted: March 27, 2014 Decided: April 1, 2014

Before MOTZ, Circuit Judge, and HAMILTON and DAVIS, Senior 

Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Hugh Epps, Appellant Pro Se. Gurney Wingate Grant, II, Michael 

Calvin Moore, Assistant United States Attorneys, Richmond, 

Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Hugh Epps seeks to appeal the district court’s order 

treating his motion for a writ of error coram nobis as a 

successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion, and dismissing it on 

that basis. The order is not appealable unless a circuit 

justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability 

will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Epps has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we 

deny Epps’ motion for a transcript at government expense, deny a 

certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma 

pauperis, and dismiss the appeal.
3

Additionally, we construe Epps’ notice of appeal and 

informal brief as an application to file a second or successive 

§ 2255 motion. United States v. Winestock, 340 F.3d 200, 208 

(4th Cir. 2003). In order to obtain authorization to file a 

successive § 2255 motion, a prisoner must assert claims based on 

either:

(1) newly discovered evidence that . . . would be 

sufficient to establish by clear and convincing 

evidence that no reasonable factfinder would have 

found the movant guilty of the offense; or

(2) a new rule of constitutional law, made retroactive 

to cases on collateral review by the Supreme Court, 

that was previously unavailable.

28 U.S.C. § 2255(h) (2012). Epps’ claims do not satisfy either 

of these criteria. Therefore, we deny authorization to file a 

successive § 2255 motion. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

DISMISSED
# C_2017014EN.01000702.xml

| 16.1.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 14/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.1.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 14/7

---

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 17 November 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesarbeitsgericht — Germany) — Betriebsrat der Ruhrlandklinik gGmbH v Ruhrlandklinik gGmbH

(Case C-216/15) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Directive 2008/104/EC - Temporary agency work - Scope - Concept of ‘worker’ - Concept of ‘economic activities’ - Nursing staff who do not have a contract of employment assigned to a health care institution by a not-for-profit association))

(2017/C 014/09)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesarbeitsgericht

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Betriebsrat der Ruhrlandklinik gGmbH

Respondent: Ruhrlandklinik gGmbH

Operative part of the judgment

Article 1(1) and (2) of Directive 2008/104/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on temporary agency work must be interpreted as meaning that the scope of that directive covers the assignment by a not-for-profit association, in return for financial compensation, of one of its members to a user undertaking for the purposes of that member carrying out, as his main occupation and under the direction of that user undertaking, work in return for remuneration, where that member is protected on that basis in the Member State concerned, this being a matter for the referring court to determine, even if that member does not have the status of worker under national law on the ground that he has not concluded a contract of employment with that association.

---

(1)  
  OJ C 270, 17.8.2015.

---
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-14-00365-CV

In the Matter of J. M. B., A Child

On Appeal from the

449th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas

Trial Cause No. J-192-14-K

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the appeal should be DISMISSED. The Court orders the appeal 

DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion. No cost are assessed as appellant is 

exempt from payment.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

August 7, 2014
Before the Third Division,

February 26, 1943

No. 48058.

#### Petition 6181-R of Norman G. Jensen (Pembina).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

From the testimony of an employee of the customs broker, the petitioner in this case, it was found that in making the entry the petitioner acted without intention to misrepresent the facts or to defraud the revenue of the United States, or to deceive the appraiser. The petition was therefore granted.
|  |
|--|
|  | Message from                                                                                                                                                                        Donna E. Shalala

Foreword

Preface

Acknowledgments

Table of Contents

Chapter 1                                                                                                                                                        Introduction

Chapter 2                                                                                                                                                        The Magnitude of Youth Violence

Chapter 3                                                                                                                                                        The Developmental Dynamics of Youth Violence

Chapter 4                                                                                                                                                        Risk Factors for Youth Violence

Chapter 5                                                                                                                                                        Prevention and Intervention

Chapter 6                                                                                                                                                        A Vision for the Future

Glossary

Index

List of Tables and Figures

Executive Summary | Press
**Mr. Damon Thompson**                            202-260-9123

 
****Back to Top |
National Renewable Energy Laboratory 

The Wind/Water Nexus The Wind/Water Nexus

Laura Miner, U.S. Department of Energy 

Larry Flowers, National Renewable Energy Laboratory 

Laura Miner, U.S. Department of Energy

Larry Flowers, National Renewable Energy Laboratory

Water Use Water Use Water Withdrawals Water Withdrawals Water & Population

Water & Population

Irrigation Second largest water user in the United States; 

irrigation accounts for 137 billion gallons per 

day, about 34% of water withdrawn 

About 14% of U.S. farms are irrigated, 

representing 55 million acres of irrigated land 

Irrigation systems use diesel, gasoline, 

electricity, propane, or natural gas, depending 

on local economics, availability, and pump size. 

Characterization Characterization Solutions

Solutions

Nine of the top 10 irrigation states (California, 

Texas, Idaho, Arkansas, Colorado, Nebraska, 

Arizona, Kansas, Washington, and Oregon) have 

good to excellent wind resources 

The rising and uncertain future costs of diesel, 

natural gas, and even electricity increase the 

opportunity for wind energy and its predictable 

and competitive cost 

Hybrid wind-gas or wind-diesel systems provide 

another option. 

Atlantic County Utilities Authority 

Public Supply In 2000, total freshwater withdrawals for 

public supply were 43.3 billion gallons per 

day 

Population/urban growth stress water 

supplies, and the highest population growth 

is projected in regions with limited water 

resources 

The states with the largest public supply 

withdrawals are (in descending order) 

California, Texas, New York, Florida, 

Illinois, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Georgia, 

Michigan, and Arizona. 

Desalination 

Twelve of the 15 fastest-growing states (1995– 

2025), eight of the 10 states with the largest 

public water supply withdrawals, and nine of the 

10 states with the highest per capita water 

consumption have good to excellent wind 

resources 

Offshore (including the Great Lakes) wind 

resources are particularly robust and close to 

large and growing metropolitan areas 

Wind energy is relatively economically 

competitive, predictable, and renewable—all 

benefits to municipal electricity/water providers. 

One strategy to address impending water 

shortages is the development of new water 

sources, such as brackish aquifers and sea 

water. Desalination is utilized by coastal cities 

as well as inland municipalities with access to 

brackish water sources. The United States is 

home to 20% of the world’s desalination 

facilities 

Desalination requires a constant power supply, 

and electricity is the major cost for these plants: 

for brackish water, electricity use is 11% of total 

cost, and for seawater, it is 44% of operating 

costs for the plant. 

Many growing coastal cities with high energy 

costs are located in good wind resource 

areas 

Desalination systems can be installed offgrid, powered by wind or hybrid systems 

(such as wind-diesel). 

The information contained in this poster is subject to a government license | WINDPOWER 2006 | Pittsburgh, PA | June 4-7, 2006 | NREL/PO-500-39213
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

This notice corrects a notice (FR Doc. E7-2770) published on page 7656 of the issue for Friday, February 16, 2007.

Under the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago heading, the entry for Randall R. Schwartz, Orland Park, Illinois; Susan M. Schwartz, Orland Park, Illinois; Richard H. Schwartz, Lemont, Illinois; Esther V. Schwartz, Lemont, Illinois; Clarence J. Ludwig, Sarasota, Florida; Mary Lou Ludwig, Sarasota, Florida; William D. Ludwig, Lincoln, Nebraska, Linda S. Macaskill, Sarasota, Florida; and John D. Macaskill, Sarasota, Florida, is revised to read as follows:

**A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago**                     (Burl Thornton, Assistant Vice President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414:                

                    1.                     *Randall R. Schwartz, the Susan M. Schwartz Trust*, Orland Park, Illinois; Susan M. Schwartz as trustee of the Susan M. Schwartz Trust; Richard H. Schwartz and Esther V. Schwartz, both of Lemont, Illinois; the Clarence J. Ludwig Trust, Sarasota, Florida; Clarence J. Ludwig as trustee of the Clarence J. Ludwig Trust, the Mary Lou Ludwig Trust, Sarasota, Florida; Mary Lou Ludwig as trustee of the Mary Lou Ludwig Trust, the William D. Ludwig Trust, Lincoln, Nebraska; William D. Ludwig as trustee of the William D. Ludwig Trust, Linda S. Macaskill, the John D. Macaskill Revocable Trust, Sarasota, Florida; and John D. Macaskill as trustee of the John D. Macaskill Revocable Trust; to retain voting shares of First Personal Financial Corp., Orland Park, Illinois, and thereby indirectly retain voting shares of First Personal Bank, Orland Park, Illinois.                

Comments on this application must be received by May 7, 2007.

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, April 23, 2007.

Robert deV. Frierson,

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. E7-8044 Filed 4-26-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
Bureau of Labor Statistics

**Series Id: Series title:**  **Labor force status: Type of data:**  **Age: Years:**  **Year Qtr1**  **Qtr2 Qtr3**  **Qtr4 Annual**  **2011** 2122 Unemployed Number in thousands 55 years and over 2011 to 2011 

### Labor Force Statistics from the Current Population Survey **Original Data Value** LNU03024230Q **Not Seasonally Adjusted** (Unadj) Unemployment Lev el - 55 yrs. & over

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics Generated on: May 16, 2011 (02:09:49 PM)
EXHIBIT 10 (U)

NBD Bank
611 Woodward Avenue
Detroit, Michigan 48226


June 30, 1996

United Industrial Corporation
Detroit Stoker Company
18 East 48th Street
New York, New York 10017

Ladies and Gentlemen:

This letter amends the terms of the Letter Loan Agreement dated November 30,
1995 (as modified by our letter agreement dated July 18, 1996, the "Loan
Agreement") between NBD Bank, a Michigan banking corporation, (the "Bank"),
United Industrial Corporation, a Delaware corporation, ("United Industrial"),
and Detroit Stoker Company, a Michigan corporation, ("Detroit Stoker"). Terms
used and not otherwise defined in this letter shall have the meanings ascribed
to them in the Loan Agreement.

There are currently outstanding under the Credit Facility loans to United
Industrial in an aggregate principal amount of $3,000,000 (the "Existing
Loans"), Letters of Credit for the account of United Industrial in an aggregate
face amount of $2,857,600 and Letters of Credit for the account of Detroit
Stoker in an aggregate face amount of $254,660 (collectively, the "Existing
Letters of Credit").

The Expiration Date set forth in the first paragraph of the Loan Agreement is
extended from September 30, 1996 to December 31, 1996. Notwithstanding any
provision of the Loan Agreement to the contrary, the Bank shall not extend any
new Advances under the Credit Facility. Until the Expiration Date, the Borrowers
may renew the Existing Loans but may not reborrow once those loans are paid
down.

Except as amended by this letter, the terms of the Loan Agreement shall remain
in full force and effect.



<PAGE>


United Industrial Corporation
Page 2
June 30, 1996



Please indicate your assent to the terms of this letter by signing below and
returning the original to me. The enclosed copy is for your records. As always,
please feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you may have
regarding this matter.

Very truly yours,

NBD BANK

By:      _____________________
         Ana R. Hoffman

Its:     Vice President


Accepted and agreed to this _____ day of _________________________ , 1996.

UNITED INDUSTRIAL CORPORATION


By:__________________________


Its:_________________________


DETROIT STOKER COMPANY



By:__________________________



Its:_________________________
# C_2017161EN.01001701.xml

| 22.5.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 161/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.5.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 161/17

---

Order of the President of the Court of 28 February 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale civile di Roma — Italy) — X v Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri

(Case C-167/15) (1)

1

(2017/C 161/22)

Language of the case: Italian

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 245, 27.7.2015.

1

---
| Name of Subsidiary               | Jurisdiction of Incorporation        |
|----------------------------------|--------------------------------------|
| Ardal International Co.          | The Republic of the Marshall Islands |
| Alaqua Marine Limited            | Republic of Liberia                  |
| Tacita Oceanway Carrier Co.      | Republic of Liberia                  |
| Aral Sea Shipping S.A.           | Republic of Liberia                  |
| Amorita Development Inc.         | Republic of Liberia                  |
| Efploias Shipping Co.            | Republic of Liberia                  |
| Polyaristi Navigation Co.        | Republic of Liberia                  |
| Lawry Shipping Ltd.              | The Republic of the Marshall Islands |
| Rosetta Navigation Corp. Limited | Hong Kong                            |
| Triton Shipping Limited          | Hong Kong                            |
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-10910 Conference Calendar

MORRIS GLENN IVY, JR., Petitioner-Appellant,

versus GARY L. JOHNSON, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division, Respondent-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:98-CV-861-Y

- - - - - - - - - - October 18, 2000 Before SMITH, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Morris Glenn Ivy, Texas prisoner # 547727, appeals the district court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition as time-barred by the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act’s one-year limitations period. Ivy argues that the prison law library did not receive a copy of the AEDPA’s amendments until April 1, 1997, or three weeks prior to the expiration of the AEDPA’s grace period for filing a timely § 2254 petition. He argues that the one-year limitations period should be subject toNo. 99-10910 -2- equitable tolling as a result of this delay in information. Ivy also filed a motion requesting this court to consider the underlying merits of his petition. This motion is DENIED. This court has held that alleged inadequacies of a prison’s law library are not among the “rare and exceptional” circumstances that warrant deviation from the AEDPA’s limitations period and its one-year grace period. See Felder v. Johnson , 204 F.3d 168, 171-73 (5th Cir. 2000), petition for cert. filed , (May 8, 2000)(No. 99-10243). Accordingly, the district court’s dismissal of Ivy’s petition is AFFIRMED.
AFFIRMED; MOTION DENIED.