MONARCH CERAMIC TILE 

FLORENCE,ALAB~ 

EMISSION TEST REPORT 

KILN MAIN/KILN COOLER/PRESS DRYER 

ERA&A Project No. 2003-0711A 

Prepared For: 

Mr. Steve Wiedenvax 

Monarch Ceramic Tile 

834 Rickwood Road 

Florence,AUL 35630 

Prepared By: 

E. ROBERTS 

Alley& 

Associates 

INCORPORATED 

1931 Central Parkway SW, Ste. B 

Decatur,· AL 35601 

(256) 351-0121 

December 2003 
E. ROBERTS 

Alley& 

·Ass·ociates 

INCORPORATED 

.. , ... ,., .... .. , .. ·w *W .• ,,, .. ' -. '*MM 

SECTION 1 INTRODUCTION 

SECTION2 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 

SECTION3 TESTING METHODOLOGY 

APPENDIX A SUMMARY OF CALCULATIONS 

APPENDIXB FIELD DATA 

APPENDIXC LABORATORY DATA 

APPENDIXD QUALITY CONTROL DATA 

APPENDIXE PROCESS OPERATING DATA 

LIST OF TABLES 

TABLE OF CONTENTS 

" ... 

TABLE 2-1 ...................................................... SUMMARY OF KILN MAIN TEST RESULTS 

TABLE 2-2 ....................................... SUMMARY OF KILN COOLER TEST RESULTS 

TABLE 2-3 ........................................ SUMMARY OF PRESS DRYER TEST RESULTS 

TABLE 3-1 ...................................................... SOURCE TESTING METHODOLOGY 

TABLE A-1 ...................... KILN MAIN- VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE CALCULATIONS 

TABLE A-2 ............................................. KILN MAIN- EMISSION CALCULATIONS 

TABLE A-3 .................. KILN COOLER- VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE CALCULATIONS 

TABLE A-4 ......................................... KILN COOLER·- EMISSION CALCULATIONS 

TABLE A-5 .................. PRESS DRYER- VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE CALCULATIONS 

TABLE A-6 ......................................... PRESS DRYER-EMISSION CALCULATIONS 
E. ROBERTS 

Alley& 

Associates 

INCORPORATED SECTION I 

INTRODUCTION 
E. ROBERTS 

Aile~& 

Associates 

INCORPORATED 

-· 

SECTION I 

INTRODUCTION 

E. Roberts Alley & Associates, Inc. (ERA&A) was retained by Monarch Ceramic Tile 

(Monarch) to conduct particulate and carbon monoxide emission testing on the Kiln 1 

Main and Cooler stacks and the Press Dryer 1 stack at its Florence, Alabama facility. 

The scope of work included conducting three one-hour particulate (EPA Reference 

Method 5) test runs and three one-hour carbon monoxide (EPA Reference Method 1 0) 

test runs on each source. The results of emission testing will allow Monarch to determine 

particulate and carbon monoxide emission factors for each source. 

ERA&A' s test team consisted of Jeremy Hutchens, Project Coordinator/Mobile Lab 

Operator, Ryan O'Dea, Meter Console Operator, Stacey Cunningham, Meter Console 

Operator, and Doug Daugherty. ERA&A's test team arrived onsite on December 9 for 

equipment setup and preliminary testing. The emission testing was initiated on 

December 11 and completed on December 12. Mr. Steve Wiederwax served as 

ERA&A' s onsite contact throughout the testing. There were no representatives from the 

Alabama Department of Environmental Management present for the emission testing. 

c:\\Projects\i\1onarch\2003-0711A\EngineeringTestReport 1-1 
E. ROBERTS 

Alley& 

Associates INCORPORATED SECTIONl 

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 
E. ROBERTS 

Aile~& 

Associates 

INCORPORATED 

' HSe .. , 

SECTION2 

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 

· ··Cat · ···-,;· ·- ---~; · 1 · · .. , 

Tables 2-1 through 2-3 detail the emission testing results. Any difference between. the 

calculated results contained in the appendices and the reported results in the summary 

table is due to rounding for presentation. 

TABLE2-1 

Summary of Kiln Main Test Results 

: ··: .. ,:··· ··: ." ...... ~· ., x; ·~;': ·.~JI;n.;J.,, . ;·~ . '··f'.:,i,Jtuxfl2o.':. ; ·· ·'; :Klint~\:,·.·,::,., ,~ ·:~NtejfE'' . , .. · 

Date 12/11/03 12/11/03 12/11/03 ---- Start Time 12:34 14:17 15:55 ---- End Time 13:38 15:21 17:00 ---- Stack Gas Data 

Temperature, °F 463 467 466 465 

Moisture,% 6.5 6.3 6.1 6.3 

C02 Concentration, % 2.4 2.5 2.4 2.4 

0 2 Concentration,% 16.8 16.6 16.9 16.8 

Velocity, ftlsec 55.1 54.5 55.4 55.0 

VFR, x 103 dscfm 7.6 7.5 7.7 7.6 

PM Emission Data 

Concentration, grains/dscf X l 0"3 4.2 3.5 2.5 3.4 

Emission Rate, lbs/hr 0.27 0.22 0.16 0.22 

CO Emission Data 

Concentration, ppmvd 149 150 155 152 

Concentration, ppmvd (C02 Corrected) 146 147 151 148 

Emission Rate, lbs/hr 4.85 4.82 5.07 4.91 

c:\\Projects\Monarch\2003-0711 A \EngineeringTestReport 2- I 
E. ROBERTS 

Aile~& 

Associates 

INCORPORATED 

r -\H ·., ~ 

SECTION2 

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 

e §# §t ·g. '*' 

TABLE2-2 

Summary of Kiln Cooler Test Results 

Date 

Start Time 

End Time 

Stack Gas Data 

Temperature, °F 

Moisture,% 

C02 Concentration, % 

0 2 Concentration, % 

Velocity, ftlsec 

VFR, x 104 dscfm 

PM Emission Data 

Concentration, grains/dscf X 1 0"3 

Emission Rate, lbs/hr 

CO Emission Data 

Concentration, ppmvd 

Emission Rate, lbs/hr 

p:g @&g 49 &+ 

c:\\Projects\Monarch\2003-0711 A \EnginceringTcstReport 

12/11/03 12/11/03 12/11/03 

12:35 14:17 15:56 

13:39 15:21 17:00 

276 273 265 272 

1.2 1.3 1.4 1.3 

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

21.0 21.0 21.0 21.0 

79.3 79.5 79.0 79.3 

1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 

1.3 1.3 0.9 1.2 

0.20 0.19 0.15 0.18 

7.6 10.9 10.7 9.7 

0.59 0.85 0.84 0.76 

414£ 4 p a & 

2-2 
E. ROBERTS 

Alle:f& 

Associates 

INCORPORATED 

m *i* --

SECTION2 

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 

Mpf, ··-

TABLE2-3 

Summary of Press Dryer Test Results 

Stack Gas Data 

Temperature, °F 258 262 261 260 

Moisture,% 5.4 6.0 6.9 6.1 

C02 Concentration, % 2.0 1.5 2.5 2.0 

0 2 Concentration, % 18.5 18.5 18.5 18.5 

Velocity, ft/sec 53.1 54.6 53.9 53.9' 

x 103 dscfm 3.3 3.4 3.3 3.3 

PM Emission Data 

Concentration, grains/ dscf X I 0"3 7.6 10.0 9.9 9.3 

Emission lbs/hr 0.22 0.30 0.28 0.27 

CO Emission Data 

Concentration, ppmvd 127 139 138 135 

Concentration, ppmvd (C02 Corrected) 125 137 134 132 

Emission Rate lbs/hr 1.81 2.02 1.94 1.92 

c:\\Projects\Monarch\2003-0711 A\EngineeringTestReport 2-3 
E. ROBERTS 

ABe~& 

Associates 

INCORPORATED SECfiON3 

TESTI·NG METHODOLOGY 
E. ROBERTS 

Aile~& 

Associates 

INCORPORATED 

, 

SECTION3 

TESTING METHODOLOGY 

• 

The emission-testing program was conducted in accordance with the U.S. EPA Reference 

Methods summarized in Table 3-1. Method descriptions are provided below while the 

quality assurance data are provided in the referenced appendices. 

TABLE3-l 

SOURCE TESTING METHODOLOGY 

Appendix Reference 

Method Quality 

Method Description Control 

Parameter Number Comments 

Volumetric Flow Rate 1-4 3.1 D 

Oxygen/Carbon Dioxide 3A 3.2 D Instrumental Analysis 

Particulate Matter 5 3.3 D lsokinetic Sampling 

Carbon Monoxide 10 3.4 D Instrumental Analysis 

3.1 VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE 

The velocity of the stack gas was determined in strict accordance with EPA Reference 

Method 2. A total of twenty-four traverse points were used to measure the Kiln Main and 

Kiln Cooler stack gas velocity pressures. A total of twelve traverse points were used to 

measure the Press Dryer stack gas velocity pressure. The static pressure of the stack gas 

was measured with the static side of a calibrated S-Type pi tot an~ an inclined manometer. 

The oxygen and carbon dioxide concentrations were determined in accordance with EPA 

Reference Method 3. An integrated bag sample was procured during each particulate test 

run and analyzed with either a Pyrite 02/C02 analyzer or CAl Model 300P 02/C02 

analyzer. The moisture content was determined in accordance with EPA Reference 

Method 4. The impinger train consisted of four glass impingers: the first and second 

containing 1 00 mL of water; the third empty; and the fourth containing approximately 

200 grams of silica gel. The impinger contents were measured or weighed before and 

after each 60-minute particulate run, and the volume or weight gain was used to 

determine the stack gas moisture content. 

The stack gas velocity pressure, temperature, oxygen and carbon dioxide concentrations, 

and moisture content were used to calculate the stack gas volumetric flow rate. 

c:\\Projects\Monarch\2003-0711 A\EngineeringTestReport 3-1 
E. ROBERTS 

Aile~& 

Associates 

INCORPORATED 

3.2 OXYGEN/CARBON DIOXIDE 

SECTION3 

TESTING METHODOLOGY 

The Kiln Main and Press Dryer integrated bag samples were analyzed by EPA Reference 

Method 3A using a CAl Model 300P 0 2/C02/CO analyzer. An analyzer calibration was 

performed before the analysis of each bag sample using EPA Protocol 1 calibration gases. 

The bag sample was connected directly to the instrument and the concentration was 

recorded on a field data sheet by reading the display of the instrument. 

3.3 PARTICULATE MATTER 

The particulate testing was conducted in strict accordance with EPA Reference Method 5. 

The sampling system consisted of a stainless nozzle, stainless lined probe, pre-weighed 

glass-fiber filter, gas conditioning system, dry gas meter and leak-free pump. The gas 

conditioning system is described in Section 3 .1. 

Three 60-minute test runs were conducted on the Kiln 1 Main and Cooler stacks and the 

Press Dryer 1 stack. The gas stream was sampled isokinetically by adjusting the sample 

flow rate to correspond to the flow conditions at each sampling (traverse) point. After 

each test run, the sample train was leak checked at a vacuum pressure equal to or greater 

than the maximum pressure reached during the test run. 

The probe and nozzle were rinsed with acetone after each run to remove the adhering 

particulate matter. The front half of the filter holder was also rinsed with acetone, and 

this rinse was added to the probe/nozzle rinse. The pre-weighed glass fiber filter was 

carefully removed and placed in its sample container. All containers were sealed, 

labeled, and liquid levels marked for transport to the laboratory. 

The mass of particulate matter collected in the probe and nozzle was determined by 

evaporating the acetone rinse in a pre-weighed glass beaker and then weighing the 

residue until a constant weight was obtained. The filter loading was determined by 

subtracting the final constant filter weight from the initial constant weight. The total 

particulate loading, which was used to calculate the concentration of particulate matter in 

the exhaust gas, was determined by adding these two weights. All weight measurements 

were made on the same balance (accurate to 0.01 mg). 

3.4 CARBON MONOXIDE 

The stack gas was withdrawn through a stainless sample probe, gas conditioning system, 

Teflon sample line, and to a CAl Model 300P 0 2/C02/CO analyzer or a TECO Model 

h·Ai us a+& sea•sa aaw ;;: 4 ~At±¥& 4·'4'4P11 8&Aff 1 

c:\\Projects\Monarch\2003-0711 A\EnginecringTestReport 3-2 
E. ROBERTS 

Aile~& 

Associates 

INCORPORATED 

d 

SECTION3 

TESTING METHODOLOGY 

1 

48C CO analyzer. The gas conditioning system was a non-contact condenser used to 

remove the stack gas moisture. Data was acquired online and in strict accordance with 

EPA Reference Method 10. A total of three 60-minute test runs were performed on each 

stack. 

An analyzer calibration and system recovery check were performed before testing was 

initiated. A system recovery check was also conducted following the completion of each 

60-minute test run. Additional analyzer calibrations were conducted as needed. EPA 

Protocol 1 calibration gases were used to conduct analyzer calibrations and system 

recovery checks. Copies of all calibration gas certificates can be found in Appendix D. 

c:\\Projects\Monarch\2003-0711 A \EngineeringTestReport 3-3 
. ___ z: s a_ 

E. ROBERTS 

Aile!& 

Associates 

INCORPORATED 

J . 

APPENDIX A 

SUMMARY OF CALCULATIONS 
E. ROBERTS 

Alle:f& 

Associates 

INCORPORATED 

APPENDIX A 

SUMMARY OF CALCULATIONS 

*=. iA®atijfji§. %'"" .• 

KILN MAIN/RUN 1 SAMPLE CALCULATIONS 

Meter Pressure (Pm), in. Hg 

Pm = Pb+------~------- 13. 6 in. H20/in. Hg 

where, Pb = barometric pressure, in. Hg 

~H = Pressure differential of orifice in. H20 

P = 3021 . H 1·

246 

m in.H20 = 3030. H . zn. g + . . zn. g 13.6in.H2()/in.Hg 

Absolute Stack Gas Pressure (Ps), in. Hg 

Ps = Pb+---P.:..g __ _ 

13.6 in. H20/in. Hg 

where, Pb =barometric pressure, in. Hg 

Pg =Static Pressure, in. H20 

P = 3021 . H 0·

32 in.H20 = 3023 . H s . ln. g + . zn. g 13. 6 in. H20/in. Hg 

Standard Meter Volume (Vmstd), dscf 

~~ d 17.647 °Rfin. Hg x Y x Vm x Pm 

rmn = . Tm 

where, Y = meter correction factor 

Vm =meter volume, cf 

Pm =meter pressure, in. Hg 

Tm = meter temperature, 0

R 

Vmstd = 17.647 ° Rlin. Hg x 1.035 x 35.342 cf x 30.30 in. Hg = 37.

102 dscf 

527.2 °R 

Standard Wet Volume (Vwstd), scf 

3 Vwstd = 0. 04707 ft lmL x Vlc 

where, VIc= volume of H20 collected, ml 

Vwstd =0.04707 ft3

/mL x 54.4 mL = 2.561 scf 

c:\\Projects\Monarch\2003-0711 A \EngineeringTestReport A-1 
E. ROBERTS 

Aile~& 

Associates 

INCORPORATED 

APPENDIX A 

SUMMARY OF CALCULATIONS 

Moisture Fraction (Measured), (Bws) 

Vwstd Bws = ------ = 

1.246 scf = 0.065 

(Vwstd + Vmstd) 1.246 scf + 37.102 dscf 

Moisture 0/o, (Bws %) 

where, Vwstd =standard wet volume, scf 

Vmstd =standard meter volume, dscf 

Bws = Bws x 100 = 0.065 x 100 = 6.5% 

Molecular Weight (DRY) (Md), lb/lb-mole 

Md = {0.44 x% CO}+ (0.32 x% OJ+ {0.28 (100-% C02 -% 0}) 

Md = (0.44 x 2.4) + (0.32 x 16.8) + (0.28 (100- 2.4 -16.8)) = 29.06 lb/lb- mole 

Molecular Weight (WET) (Ms), lb/lb-mole 

Ms = Md (1- Bws) + 18 (Bws) 

where, Md =molecular weight (DRY), lb/lb-mole 

Bws = moisture fraction, dimensionless 

.Ms = 29.06 lb/lb- mole (1- 0. 065) + 18 (0. 065) = 28.34/b/lb- mole 

Average Velocity (Vs), ft/sec 

Vs = 85.49-ft (lbllb- mole) (in. Hg) x Cp x .J Delta P avg. x ~s 

sec ( 0 R)(in. H 20) Ps X Ms 

where, Cp = pitot tube coefficient 

Delta P = velocity head of stack gas, in. H20 

Ts =absolute stack temperature, 0R 

Ps =absolute stack gas pressure, in. Hg 

Ms = molecular weight of stack gas, lb/lb-mole 

ft (lb/lb - mole) (in. J-Ig) Vs=85.49- x 0.84 x 0.740 in.H1

0 x 

sec ( 0 R)(in.H20) 30.23 in. Hg x 28.34 lb/lb- mole 

Vs = 55.1 ftlsec 

f. A· MY ~ 1

W¥AbiA · 4 44? 't: hR¥£94w4W 39® &? 6 -5 '* ;;;p;+-499¥4 +16 ~A- AY 

c:\\Projects\Monarch\2003-0711 A\EngineeringTestRepon A-2 
E. ROBERTS 

Aile~& 

Associates 

INCORPORATED 

APPENDIX A 

SUMMARY OF CALCULATIONS 

* 

Average Stack Gas Flow at Stack Conditions (Qa), acfm 

Qa = 60 sec/min x Vs x As 

where, Vs = stack gas velocity, ftlsec 

As = cross-sectional area of stack, ft2 

Qa = 60 sec/min x 55.1 ft/sec x 4.28 ft 2 

= 1.4 E + 04 acfm 

Average Stack Gas Flow at Standard Conditions (Qs), dscfm 

0 R Ps Qs=/7.647-- x Qa x (1-Bws) xin. Hg Ts 

where, Qa = average stack gas flow at stack conditions, ftl /min 

Bws =moisture content (dimensionless) 

Ps =absolute stack gas pressure, in. Hg 

Ts =absolute stack temperature, 0

R 

oR 1 E 0 acf (1 0 065:} 30·

23 in. Hg -- 7.6 E + 03 dsc·hm Qs=17.647 X .4 + 4- X - · I X 9230R :1' 

in. Hg min 

Particulate Concentration (c5), grains/dscf 

M n x0.0154 

c ------

s- Vmstd 

where, Mn = particulate mass from filter and front half rinse, mg 

Vmstd =standard meter volume, dscf 

c = 10.0 mgx 0.0154 grains/mg = 4.2 E-03grainsldscf 

s 3 7.1 02 dscf 

Particulate Emission Rate (PMR), lbs/hr 

PMR = cs x Qs x60+7000 

where, Qs = volumetric flow rate, dscfm 

Plv/R = 4.2 E- 03 grains I dscf x 7.6 E + 03 dscf /minx 60 min/ hr 

7000 grains I lb 

PMR = 0.27 lbs/hr 

c:\\ProJects\Monarch\2003-0711 A\EngineeringTestRepor1 A- 3 
E. ROBERTS 

Alle:r& 

Associates 

INCORPORATED 

w 

CO Concentration (Ceo (stack)), ppmvd 

* 

APPENDIX A 

SUMMARY OF CALCULATIONS 

aa * 

Ceo (stack) = Ceo (NDJR) x (1- Feo2) 

where, Ceo (stack) = CO cone. in stack, ppmvd 

Ceo (NDIR) =CO cone. measured by analyzer, ppmvd 

Fcoz= Volume fraction ofC02 in sample, %/100 

Ceo (stack) = 149.2 ppmvd x (1 - (2. 411 00) = 145.6 ppmvd 

CO Emission Rate (ER), lbs/hr 

ER = (Cx * MW x * Qs * 60 * 28.32) I (24.04 * 10 E+06 * 454) 

where, Qs = volumetric flow rate, dscfm 

Ceo (stack) = CO concentration in stack, ppmvd 

MW = molecular weight, 28.01 gig-mole 

ER = (145.6f.LL/L*28.0lg!g-mole*7.6E+03*60minlhr*28.32L/ft3

)/(24.04L/g-mole*lOE+06 f.LLIL*454gllb) 

ER = 4.85 lbslhr 

h - ws ~ 6Ai &A& A g 4& A &4?4 dr¥AW§S4 

c:\\Projects\Monarch\2003-0711 A \EngineeringTestRcport A·4 
E. ROBERTS 

Aile~& 

Associates 

INCORPORATED 

APPENDIX A 

SUMMARY OF CALCULATIONS 

TABLE A-t 

KILIN MAIN- VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE CALCULATIONS 

Run Number I 2 3 Average 

Date 12/1112003 12/11/2003 12/11/2003 --- Square Root of Delta P, (in. H20)"'h 0.740 0.730 0.742 0.737 

Pitot Tube Coefficient (Cp) 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 

Barometric Pressure (Pb ), in. Hg 30.21 30.21 30.21 30.21 

Static Pressure (Pg), in. H20 0.32 0.30 0.30 0.31 

Stack Pressure (Ps), in. Hg 30.23 30.23 30.23 30.23 

Stack Diameter, in. 28 28 28 28 

Stack Cross-sectional Area, ft"2 4.28 4.28 4.28 4.28 

Temperature (ts), °F 463.0 466.6 465.7 465.1 

Moisture (Bws) 0.065 0.063 0.061 0.063 

C02 Concentration (C02),% 2.4 2.5 2.4 2.4 

02 Concentration (02),% 16.8 16.6 16.9 16.8 

Molecular Weight (Ms), lb/lb-mole 28.34 28.36 28.39 28.36 

Velocity (Vs), ftlsec 55.1 54.5 55.4 55.0 

Volumetric Flow Rate 

At Stack Conditions (Qa), ACFM 14!146 13,988 14,203 14,112 

At Standard Conditions (Qs), DSCFM 7,646 7,540 7,684 7,623 

c·\\Projects\Monarch\2003-0'7 llA\EngineeringTestReport A-5 
E. ROBERTS 

Aile~& 

Associates 

INCORPORATED 

APPENDIX A 

SUMMARY OF CALCULATIONS 

*'6' Wt*M* ffib8 Rfi±trit*g& ± $ e ±*e , ..... '*. . +id ¥E1 

TABLEA-2 

KILN MAIN- EMISSION CALCULATIONS 

Run Number I 2 3 Mean 

Date 12111/2003 12/11/2003 12/11/2003 --- Clock Time 1234-1338 1417-1521 1555-1700 --- { .... .. . ·~~ : .. · 

. ·:<D.Wu.t.D..AWA: ... . .. 

., : ... . .. 

Process Rate, tonslhr 5.65 5.65 5.65 5.65 

Run Time, min 60 60 60 60 

Barometric Pressure, in. Hg 30.21 30.21 30.21 30.21 

Meter Correction Factor 1.035 1.035 1.035 1.035 

Orifice Calibration Value 1.913 1.913 1.913 1.913 

Meter Volume, ft"3 35.342 34.932 35.496 35.257 

Meter Temperature, °F 67.2 71.7 63.8 67.6 

Meter Orifice Pressure, in. H20 1.246 1.216 1.245 1.236 

Volume H20 Collected, mL 54.4 52.3 51.7 52.8 

Nozzle Diameter, in 0.248 0.248 0.248 0.248 

Area of Nozzle, ft"2 0.00034 0.00034 0.00034 0.00034 

P~iculate Mass, mg 10.0 8.2 6.0 8.1 

Carbon Monoxide Concentration, ppmvd 149.2 150.4 154.9 151.5 

ISOKINETIC DATA 

Standard' Meter Volume, ft? 37.102 36.358 37.505 36.988 

Standard Water Volume, re 2.561 2.462 2.434 2.485 

Moisture Fraction (Measured) 0.065 0.063 0.061 0.063 

Meter Pressure·, in Hg 30.30 30.30 30.30 30.30 

Volume at Nozzle, ft"3 68.62 67.43 69.30 68.45 

Isokinetic Sampling, (1 00% +I- 1 0%) 103.1 102.4 103.7 103.0 

Orifice Calibration Checks,(+/- 5%) 2.2 2.2 2.7 2.4 

'· : j ... , .. '·:-· ... 

.. .EMISSION·D:A:TA . .-<;:: :'' ' . - . ' . - - . 

Particulate Concentration, grains/DSCF 4.2E-03 3.5E-03 2.5E-03 3.4E-03 

Particulate Emission Rate, lbslhr 0.27 0.22 0.16 0.22 

CO, ppmvd (C02 corrected) 145.6 146.6 151.2 147.8. 

CO Emission Rate, lbs/hr 4.85 4.82 5.07 4.91 

Hh HQiiM 

c:\\Projecls\Monarch\2003-0711 A \EngineeringTesiReport A -6 
E. ROBERTS 

Alle:y& 

Associates 

INCORPORATED 

APPENDIX A 

SUMMARY OF CALCULATIONS 

*Eifb 

TABLEA-3 

KILN COOLER- VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE CALCULATIONS 

Run Number 1 2 3 Average 

Date 12/1112003 12/11/2003 12/11/2003 --- Square Root of Delta P, (in. 1-120)"~ 1.199 1.203 1.203 1.202 

Pitot Tube Coefficient {Cp) 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 

Barometric Pressure {Pb ), in. Hg 30.21 30.21 30.21 30.21 

Static Pressure (Pg), in. H20 0.20 0.18 0.19 0.19 

Stack Pressure (Ps), in. Hg 30.22 30.22 30.22 30.22 

Stack Diameter, in. 31 31 31 31 

Stack Cross-sectional Area, ft"2 5.24 5.24 5.24 5.24 

Temperature (ts), °F 276.1 273.3 265.2 271.5 

Moisture {Bws) 0.012 0.013 0.014 0.013 

C02 Concentration (C02),% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

02 Concentration (02), % 21.0 21.0 21.0 21.0 

Molecular Weight {Ms), lb/lb-mole 28.71 28.70 28.68 28.70 

Velocity (Vs), ftlsec 79.3 79.5 79.0 79.3 

Volumetric Flow Rate 

At Stack Conditions {Qa), ACFM 24,942 24,986 24,849 24,926 

At Standard Conditions (Qs), DSCFM 17,853 17,925 18,005 17,927 

c·\\Projects\Monarch\2003-07 I I A \EnginceringTestReport A -7 
E. ROBERTS 

Aile~& 

Associates 

INCORPORATED 

APPENDIX A 

SUMMARY OF CALCULATIONS 

TABLEA-4 

KILN COOLER- EMISSION CALCULATIONS 

Run Number 1 2 3 Mean 

Date 12/11/2003 12/1112003 12/1112003 --- Clock Time 1235-1339 1417-1521 1556-1700 --- .' :-:r~, ~~ ,_: ·: .· ·: '~· :·: :· ·: .. ' ·'· · .·~·.L•tttw:t>~x~·· . '·. .. . :: ·~ : 

. '. I 

Process Rate, tons/hr 5.65 5.65 5.65 5.65 

Run Time, min 60 60 60 60 

Barometric Pressure, in. Hg 30.21 30.21 30.21 30.21 

Meter Correction Factor 0.997 0.997 0.997 0.997 

Orifice Calibration Value 2.211 2.211 2.211 2.211 

Meter Volume, ft"3 37.372 37.651 38.041 37.688 

Meter Temperature, °F 50.0 56.8 57.5 54.8 

Meter Orifice Pressure, in. H20 1.598 1.595 1.595 1.596 

Volume H20 Collected, mL 9.9 11.1 12.2 11.1 

Nozzle Diameter, in 0.187 0.187 0.187 0.187 

Area ofNozzle, ft"2 0.00019 0.00019 0.00019 0.00019 

Particulate Mass, mg 3.3 3.2 2.4 3.0 

Carbon Monoxide Concentration, ppmvd 7.6 10.9 10.7 9.7 . ~- rsoKINETIC,DATA 

Standard Meter Volume, ftl 39.100 38.873 39.223 39.066 

Standard Water Volume, ft3 0.466 0.522 0.574 0.521 

Moisture Fraction (Measured) 0.012 0.013 0.014 0.013 

Meter Pressure, in Hg 30.33 30.33 30.33 30.33 

Volume at Nozzle, ft"3 54.60 54.17 54.11 54.29 

Isokinetic Sampling, (100% +/- 10%) 100.3 99.3 99.7 99.8 

Orifice Calibration Checks,(+/- 5%) -0.6 -0.4 0.6 -0.1 ·- ·. ·:c .. - ... ·. i;: . ~-_,: .. ';·:eMisst0NtPAT A-~-- .. ... ~ 

,: 

Particulate Concentration, grains/DSCF 1.3E-03 1.3E-03 9.4E-04 1.2E-03 

Particulate Emission Rate, lbs/hr 0.20 0.19 0.15 0.18 

Carbon Monoxide Emission Rate, lbs/hr 0.59 0.85 0.84 0.76 

; . M&f?iht¥4¥4 RRW 1W¥ ,;, ? '' 

c:\\Projects\Monarch\2003-0711 A\EngineeringTestReport A· 8 
E. ROBERTS 

Alle:y& 

Associates 

ll'tCORPORATED 

tt% 

APPENDIX A 

SUMl.'dARY OF CALCULATIONS 

M' iii 

TABLEA-5 

PRESS DRYER- VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE CALCULATIONS 

Run Number 1 2 3 Average 

Date 12/12/2003 12112/2003 12/12/2003 --- Sguare Root of Delta P, (in. H20)"!4 0.811 0.828 0.819 0.820 

Pitot Tube Coefficient (Cp) 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 

Barometric Pressure (Pb ), in. Hg 30.28 30.28 30.28 30.28 

Static Pressure (Pg), in. H20 0.44 0.38 0.39 0.40 

Stack Pressure (Ps ), in. Hg 30.31 30.31 30.31 30.31 

Stack Diameter, in. 16.5 17 17 17 

Stack Cross-sectional Area, ft"2 1.48 1.48 1.48 1.48 

Temperature (ts), °F 257.5 262.3 261.3 260.4 

Moisture (Bws) 0.054 0.060 0.069 0.061 

C02 Concentration (C02), % 2.0 1.5 2.5 2.0 

02 Concentration (02),% 18.5 18.5 18.5 18.5 

Molecular Weight (Ms), lb/lb-mole 28.46 28.32 28.38 28.38 

Velocity (Vs), ftlsec 53.1 54.6 53.9 53.9 

Volumetric Flow Rate 

At Stack Conditions (Qa), ACFM 4,732 4,862 4,799 4,798 

At Standard Conditions (Qs), DSCFM 3,336 3,381 3,313 3,343 

c:\\Projects\Monarch\2003-0711 A\EngineeringTestRepon A-9 
E. ROBERTS 

Alle1& 

Associates 

INCORPORATED 

APPENDIX A 

SUMMARY OF CALCULATIONS 

&e =e e * '5 

TABLEA-6 

PRESS DRYER- EMISSION CALCULATIONS 

Run Number 2 3 Mean 

Date 12/12/2003 12/12/2003 12/12/2003 

Clock Time 845-949 1020-1124 155-1300 

Run Time, min 60 60 60 60 

Barometric Pressure, in. Hg 30.28 30.28 30.28 30.28 

Meter Correction Factor 1.035 1.035 1.035 1.035 

Orifice Calibration Value 1.913 1.913 1.913 1.913 

Meter Volume, ft"3 38.057 37.524 37.564 37.715 

Meter Temperature, °F 41.0 52.3 57.8 50.4 

Meter Orifice Pressure, in. H20 1.508 1.435 1.427 1.457 

Volume H20 Collected, mL 51.3 55.6 62.9 56.6 

Nozzle Diameter, in 0.231 0.231 0.231 0.231 

Area of Nozzle, ftA2 0.00029 0.00029 0.00029 0.00029 

Particulate Mass, mg 20.7 27.4 25.9 24.7 

Carbon Monoxide Concentration, ppmvd 127.2 139.3 137.5 134.7 . '··' - .... >· ·' 

IS0KINETIC.:E>ATA .. 

Standard Meter Volume, ~ 42.165 40.650 40.261 41.025 

Standard Water Volume, ft3 2.415 2.617 2.961 2.664 

Moisture Fraction (Measured) 0.054 0.060 0.069 0.061 

Meter Pressure, in Hg 30.39 30.39 30.38 30.39 

Volume at Nozzle, ft"3 59.80 58.43 58.29 58.84 

lsokinetic Sampling,{IOO% +/- 10%) 107.4 102.2 103.3 104.3 

Orifice Calibration Checks, ( +/- 5o/o) 2.0 2.7 2.7 2.5 

Particulate Concentration, grains/DSCF 7.6E-03 l.OE-02 9.9E-03 9.3E-03 

Particulate Emission Rate, lbslhr 0.22 0.30 0.28 0.27 

CO, ppmvd (C02 corrected) 124.6 137.2 134.1 132.0 

Carbon Monoxide Emission Rate, lbslhr 1.81 2.02 1.94 1.92 

"* UP ¥44 - a;;; .hi ?ES$AF% -F tlb ·¥ 4¥AHE ~ &d drG¥4 .. FF¥ ... ,; ·W& Qj 

c:\\Projects\Monnrch\2003-0711 A\EnginccringTestRepon A-10 
a 

E. ROBERTS 

Aile'-& 

Associates 

INCORPORATED 

d -- .£.& - . . . ....... jj JliiJW!Ji . _ as. s J.. .. ·-----·- · 

APPENDIXB .. ·-·-, .. Ti .. ,. -·-

FIELD DATA 
Run1 

Analyzer Data 

Date 12/11/2003 Company Monarch Tile 

Source !Kiln Main Run# 1 

I 

Time co Time co 

PPM PPM 

12:35 143.7 13:18 146.9 

12:36 143.6 13:19 147.4 

12:37 141.4 13:20 149.3 

12:38 139.6 13:21 151.2 

12:39 145.7 13:22· 152.6 

12:40 145.2 13:23 152.9 

12:41 145.5 13:24 153.5 

12:42 145.7 13:25 153.7 

12:43 145.4 13:26 155.0 

12:44 144.5 I 13:27 158.6 

12:45 142.7 13:28 160.4 

12:46 140.9 I 13:29 160.4 

12:47 142.1 13:30 161.5 

12:48 143.3 13:31 163.4 

12:49 143.7 13:32 163.1 

12:50 144.3 13:33 161.8 

12:51 145.2 13:34 161.4 I 

12:52 145.4 Average 149.2 

12:53 145.2 

12:54 145.3 

12:55 145.8 

12:56 145.2 

12:57 145.5 

12:58 145.8 

12:59 145.6 --·----·----- 13:00 145.8 

13:01 I 

I 146.4 I 

13:02 147.2 

13:03 148.1 

13:04 148.3 

13:05 148.6 

13:06 148.6 I i I ... ___ .,._ 

! +---

13:07 148.2 I 

I I ··-,____ ________ 

13:08 146.2 I i ! - 13:09 147.6 I 

13:10 151.7 

13:11 151.3 

13:12 152.3 

13:13 152.9 l 

13:14 152.6 I 

13:15 152.4 

13:16 151.8 

13:17 149.7 

Page 1 
Run 2 

Analyzer Data 

Date 12/11/2003 Company· Monarch Tile 

Source Kiln Cooler Run# 2 

Time co Time co 

PPM .PPM 

14:17 150.7 15:00 147.5 

14:18 150.7 

I 

15:01 147.7 

14:19 150.2 i 15:02 147.7 I i I 

14:20 148.1 15:03 146.9 

14:21 146.8 15:04 147.0 

14:22 147.3 15:05 147.9 

14:23 147.3 15:06 149.0 

14:24 147.8 15:07 149.0 

14:25 148.2 15:08 149.5 

14:26 149.3 15:09 149.9 

14:27 150.9 I 15:10 150.4 

14:28 152.1 I 15:11 150.7 

14:29 153.2 15:12 150.8 

14:30 153.5 15:13 151.0 

14:31 152.9 15:14 151.4 

14:32. 153.4 I 15:15 151.5 

14:33 154.9 15:16 152.3 -- - 14:34 155.3 Average 150.4 

14:35 155.9 ---·---- 14:36 156.1 

14:37 156.5 

14:38 156.7 

14:39 156.3, 

14:40 155.6 j 

14:41 153.2 I - 14:42 150.6 l 

l 

14:43 152.0 I 

14:441 152.0 

14:45, 152.6 

14:46 151.9 

14:47 151.4 

14:481 150.8 ! 

14:49 150.4 I 

14:50 . 149.3 I ==i= -- 1-· I i -- 14:51 147.0 

14:52 145.3 I ·-r-·--r-

---f--· -· 14:53, 145.4 I 

I 

14:54 145.6 I 

14:55 146.0 i 

14:56 147.0 I I 

14:57 146.6 I 

I 

14:58 14.7.7 I 

14:59 147.8 I 

I 

! 

Page 1 
Run 3 

Analyzer Data 

Date 12/11/2003 Company Monarch Tile 

Source Kiln Main Run# 3 

Time co Time co 

PPM PPM 

16:02 155.0 16:45 152.4 

16:03 156.1 16:46 155.2 

16:04 157.1 16:47 154.5 

16:05 157.2 16:48 155.9 ·- 16:06 158.6 I 16:49 157.2 

16:07 158.7 I 16:50 157.0 

16:08 157.8 16:51 157.2 

16:09 157.4 16:52 156.7 

16:10 157.4 16:53 156.2 

16:11 159.0 16:54 154.2 

16:12 159.3 16:55 151.7 

16:13 158.7 16:56 152.9 

16:14 159.0 16:57 153.8 

16:15 159.3 16:58 154.2 

16:16 159.3 16:59 154.4 

16:17 158.6 17:00 153.5 

16:18 158.4 17:01 153.3 

16:19 157.4 Average 154.9 

16:20 156.5 

16:21 155.5 

153.7 --· -·--~---·. - - 16:22 

16:23 151.8 r---·--· 

16:24 150.8 

16:25 151.7 i 

16:26 152.3 I 

16:27 152.4 I 

16:28 152.0 

16:29! 153.0 

16:30 155.1 I 

I 

16:31 153.2 i 

16:32 152.2 

16:33 152.6 

16:34! 152.4 ! 

16:35 152.1 I l ! I 

16:36 152.8 I ! i 

16:37 153.6 I i 

16:38 153.8 I 

16:39 153.7 

16:40 153.7 I i 

16:41 i 153.7 I i 

16:42: 154.1 I I I ! 

16:43i 151.4 i i 

16:44 147.7 j i 

I I I l I 

I I I 

Page 1 
Run1 

Analyzer Data 

Date 12/11/2003 Company Monarch Tile 

Source Kiln Cooler Run# 1 

Time co Time co 

PPM PPM 

12:35:08 6.7 I ' 13:18:08 7.5 

12:36:08 6.4 ! 13:19:08 7.7 

12:37:08 6.2 13:20:.08 7.4 

12:38:08 6.2 13:21:08 7.5 

12:39:08 6.2 13:22:08 8.0 

12:40:08 6.0 13:23:08 8.4 

12:41:08 6.3 13:24:08 8.4 

12:42:08 6.8 13:25:08 8.5 

12:43:08 7.1 13:26:08 8.0 

12:44:08 7.5 13:27:08 7.8 

12:45:08 7.2 13:28:08 8.0 

12:46:08 7.0 13:29:08 7.7 

12:47:08 7.1 13:30:08 7.8 

12:48:08 6.9 13:31:08 8.1 

12:49:08 7.2 13:32:08 7.8 

12:50:08 7.3 13:33:08 8.0 

12:51:08 7.9 13:34:08 7.8 

12:52:08 9.0 Average 7.6 

i - 12:53:08 8.7 I I -- _____ __t__ 

12:54:08 8.3 I 

! .. 1 - --;-----···- 12:55:08 8.7 I --- 12:56:08 I 8.8 

12:57:08 I 8~6 I I 

12:58:08 8.3 

12:59:08 8.3 

13:00:08 8.4 I 

13:01:08 8.0 

13:02:08 8.0 --~· 

13:03:08 7.8 I 

13:04:08 7.9 I 

13:05:08 7.9 

13:06:08 7.9 I 

I 

13:07:08 7.7 i 

13:08:08 7.5 I 

13:09:08 7.2 I I 

! 

13:10:08 7.0 I ! 

13:11:08 6.9 I i 

13:12:08 6.9 I ! I 

13:13:08 I 7.1 I ! ·-,------.. - ··----,---- I i 

·- - l --1.- - 13:14:08 T I 7.3 

13:15:08 I 7.2 I I i 

13:16:08 7.3 I 

13:17:08 7.3 I l 

I 

i I 

I I 

Page 1 
Run 2 

I Analyzer Data 

Date 12111/2003 Company Monarch Tile 

Source Kiln Main Run# 2 

Time co Time co 

PPM I PPM 

I 

14:17:32 9.8 15:00:32 11.7 I 

14:18:32 9.2 15:01:32 11.2 I 

14:19:32 9.1 15:02:32 11.4 

14:20:32 9.4 15:03:32 11.7 

14:21:32 9.5 15:04:32 11.7 

14:22:32 9.4 15:05:32 12.0 

14:23:32 10.5 I 15:06:32 11.7 

14:24:32 10.6 j 15:07:32 11.2 I 

14:25:32 10.5 15:08:32 11.4 ! 

14:26:32 10.9 I 15:09:32 11.7 i 

14:27:32 11.1 I 15:10:32 11.5 I 

I 

14:28:32 11.0 15:11:32 11.1 

14:29:32 11.2 15:12:32 10.7 

14:30:32 11.2 15:13:32 10.1 I 

14:31:32 11.4 15:14:32 10.1 

14:32:32 11.0 15:15:32 9.9 I 

14:33:32 10.6 15:16:32 9.7 I 

14:34:32 10.7 Average 10.9 

14:35:32 10.9 

14:36:32 10.9 -

~ 14:37:32 11.1 

14:38:32 11.0 

14:39:32 11.1 I 

14:40:32 11.2 I I i I f-___ __j__ ___ 

14:41:32 L ! ------ 11.2 ---·- I . --1-- -- 14:42:32 11.3 I 

I I 

14:43:32 11.3 I 

14:44:32 11.4 

14:45:32 I 11.2 

14:46:32 j 11.4 ! 

14:47:32 ! 10.9 ! I 

14:48:32 ! 10.5 i 

14:49:32 : 10.4 I 

14:50:32 ! .10.6 

14:51:32 11.0 - 14:52:32 10.7 

14:53:32 10.5 

14:54:32 10.5 

14:55:32 10.9 I 

14:56:32 10.7 I I I ! i I - I 

14:57:32 12.4 I I 

___L_ l I i 

14:58:32 12.4 I 

I i ! I I I 

14:59:32 12.1 I I I ·- I I 

I I 

I 

Page 1 
Run 3 

Analyzer Data 

Date 12/11/2003 Company Monarch Tile 

Source Kiln Cooler Run# 3 

I 

Time co Time co 

PPM I PPM 

I 

16:02:15 11.8 16:45:15 11.1 

16:03:15 11.7 16:46:15 11.5 

16:04:15 11.5 16:47:15 11.2 

16:05:15 11.7 16:48:15 I 11.2 

16:06:15 11.5 16:49:15 I 11.1 

16:07:15 11.3 16:50:15 11.1 

16:08:15 11.5 I I 16:51:15 11.1 

16:09:15 11.4 16:52:15 11.2 I 

16:10:15 11.3 16:53:15 11.2 I 

16:11:15 11.1 ( 16:54:15 I 11.2 

16:12:15 11.2 I 16:55:15 11.0 

16:13:15 10.9 I 

i 16:56:15 10.8 I 

16:14:15 10.9 I 16:57:15 10.7 

16:15:15 10.8 I 16:58:15 10.5 

16:16:15 10.7 I 16:59:15 10.3 

16:17:15 10.5 17:00:15 10.2 

16:18:15 10.6 17:01:15 10.0 

16:19:15 I 10.5 Average 10.7 

16:20:15 10.4 

16:21:15 10.2 I 

16:22:15 10.2 

16:23:15 

1~ -

-~ 16:24:15 9.8 ·- 16:25:15 9.8 : 

! ·--- 16:26:15 9.6 ·-- 16:27:15 9.6 I 

I 

16:28:15 9.8 l --- 16:29:15 9.8 

16:30:15 10.0 I -+ 

16:31:15! 10.3 i 

16:32:15 i 10.5 I 

I ! 

16:33:15 I 10.6 I _J__ : ~16:34:15 I ! - ! -- 10.4 ! 

16:35:15 10.3 

16:36:15 10.3 i 

I 

16:37:15 10.0 I I 

16:38:15 10.1 

16:39:15 10.0 

16:40:15 10.3 

16:41:15 1 10.3 i i [ I 

16:42:15 I 10.4 I I I I i ' I I 1 I : 

16:43:15 I 10.6 ! 

+-----~· I l I ' 

16:44:15 ! 10.7 I I 

: l -I ; 

I I I I 

Page 1 
Run1 

Analyzer Data 

Date 12/12/2003 Company Monarch Tile 

Source Dryer Run# 1 

Time co Time CO 

PPM I PPM 

8:46:34 146.0 9:29:34 119.0 

8:47:34 149.3 9:30:34 118.3 

8:48:34 151.2 9:31:34 117.2 

8:49:34 154.5 9:32:34 116.6 

8:50:34 152.8 9:33:34 115.5 

8:51:34 144.2 9:34:34 114.9 

8:52:34 136.7 9:35:34 113.8 

8:53:34 135.9 9:36:34 113.5 

8:54:34 133.9 9:37:34 114.1 

8:55:34 134.0 9:38:34 112.6 

8:56:34 134.7 ! 9:39:34 112.4 

8:57:34 134,4 1 9:40:34 111.4 

8:58:34 134.5 ! 9:41:34 113.1 

8:59:34 134.3 9:42:34 114.2 

9:00:34 135.5 1 9:43:34 114.2 

9:01:34 136.6 I ! 9:44:34 113.6 ~~~--r~~~~------~----~--------~~~-r~~~r------- 9:02:34 137.2 9:45:34 113.7 

9:03:34 137.7 Average 127.2 

9:04:34 127.5 1 

~9~:0~5:~34~---1~2~6.~9~---------~------+-------~-----~---------~----- 9:06:34 136.6 I 

9:07:34 138.3 

9:08:34 139.0 

9:09:34 140.4 

9:10:34 140.7 I ~~~~-r~~~~------~-----r------~----~------r------ 9:11:34 140.5 

9:12:34 140.5 

9:13:34 140.3 

9:14:34 138.5 I I 

9:15:34 114.2 I 

9:16:34 109.0 I 

9: 17: 34 l 113. 3 ! .. 

9: 18: 34 118. 5 I i . I : I 

___ 9_:1_9:_34_ 12o.s T~==----~----··· .. I·_-__ -.. _----~-~ _____ L _____ -~_ ----~= 9:20:34 124.1 . I l ' · 

9:21:34 -· 120.0 ~-----, ----· : ~----

9:22:34 113.6 

9:23:34 116.2 

9:24:34 117.9 

9:25:34 120.2 

9:26:34 120.7 

9:27:34 120.8 

9:28:34 120.7 

Page 1 
Run 2 

I I Analyzer Data 

Date 12/12/2003 Company Monarch Tile 

Source I Dryer Run# 2 

Time co Time co 

PPM PPM 

10:20:32 160.1 

~ 11:03:32 137.2 

10:21:32 161.7 11:04:32 137.7 

10:22:32 156.2 11:05:32 137.7 

10:23:32 154.1 l 11:06:32 137.2 

10:24:32 150.6 11:07:32 136.6 

10:25:32 147.6 11:08:32 136.6 

10:26:32 144.7 11:09:32 136.7 

10:27:32 144.3 11:10:32 137.3 

10:28:32 143.3 I 11:11:32 136.5 

10:29:32 141.7 11:12:32 136.1 

10:30:32 140.6 11:13:32 136.2 

10:31:32 139.3 11:14:32 134.8 

10:32:32 139.1 I 11:15:32 134.3 

10:33:32 137.8 11:16:32 ~33.9 

10:34:32 137.7 11:17:32 134.2 

10:35·:32 138.5 I 11:18:32 131.2 

10:36:32 139.0 11:19:32 111.4 

10:37:32 1 138.3 Average 139.3 

10:38:32 137.1 -1----· ----· 10:39:32 137.1 . ·-··--t-·----._ .. __ .. --". -........ . ··-.! .. ----· . - -· .. ---.--------:-· ._ ...... ····--- ·--- 10:40:32 136.6 . I 

10:41:32 137.5 -+ ·----:---- ·- .. 

I I 10:42:32 137.9 i 

10:43:32 137.6 I ! j 

10:44:32 138.6 

10:45:32 139.1 

10:46:32 138.7 I 

10:47:32 137.8 ! 

10:48:32 138.0 

10:49:321 140.5 

10:50:32 140.2 

10:51:32 I 139.4 

10:52:32 139.0 I I 

10:53:32 138.2 I I 

I [ 

10:54:32 l 138.3 ! I 

I 

10:55:32 l 140.2 ! 

l I I 

10:56:32 140.3 1 I 

10:57:32 ! 139.5 I 

10:58:32 137.4 I 1 

10:59:32 136.6 I 

I 

11:00:32 137.2 I I 

11:01:32 137.4 I ! ! 

11:02:32 l 137.1 I 

I 

I 

l I : I 

Page 1 
Run 2 

Analyzer Data 

Date 12112/2003 Company Monarch Tile 

Source Dryer Run# 2 

Time co Time co 

PPM PPM 

10:20:32 160.1 11:03:32 I 137.2 

10:21:32 161.7 11:04:32 I 137.7 

10:22:32 156.2 11:05:32 137.7 

10:23:32 154.1 11:06:32 137.2 

10:24:32 150.6 I 11:07:32 136.6 

10:25:32 . 147.6 11:08:32 136.6 

10:26:32 144.7 I 11:09:32 136.7 

10:27:32 144.3 11:10:32 137.3 

10:28:32 143.3 11:11:32 136.5 

10:29:32 141.7 11:12:32 136.1 

10:30:32 140.6 11:13:32 136.2 

10:31:32 139.3 11:14:32 134.8 

10:32:32 139.1 11:15:32 134.3 

10:33:32 137.8 11:16:32 I 133.9 

10:34:32 137.7 11:17:32 134.2 

10:35:32 138.5 11:18:32 131.2 

10:36:32 139.0 I 11:19:32 111.4 

10:37:32 138.3 I Average 139.3 

10:38:32 137.1 

10:39:32 137.1 - 10:40:32 136.6 ' 10:41:32 137.5 I 

10:42:32 137.9 

10:43:32 137.6 ·- 10:44:32 138.6 I - --- 10:45:32 139.1 I 

10:46:32 138.7 

10:47:32 137.8 I 

10:48:32 138.0 i 

10:49:32 140.5 I 

10:50:32 i 140.2 

10:51:32 139.4 

10:52:32 139.0 I I i 

I i 

10:53:32 : 138.2 r I ! I I 

10:54:32 I 138.3 l I I I I 

10:55:32 I 140.2 I I 

10:56:32 140.3 j ! 

10:57:32 139.5 I 

I I I t 

10:58:32 ! 137.4 I I ' j ! i 

10:59:32 i 136.6 i ! j L ____ L __ ,_ 

11 :oo:32 I i i -- 137.2 I I ! I - : I ·--- -· 11:01:32 I 137.4 L __ ; i 

I 

11:02:32 137.1 I l I ! i I 

.~ I I 

! I 

I I I ' 

Page 1 
Run 3 

Anal~er Data 

Date 12/12/2003 Comp_any Monarch Tile 

Source D_ryer Run# 3 

Time co Time co 

PPM I PPM 

11:56:47 147.0 12:39:47 134.3 

11:57:47 144.4 I I 12:40:47 135.0 

11:58:47 144.0 1 12:41:47 133.7 1 

11:59:47 146.8 12:42:47 133.4 

12:00:47 146.4 12:43:47 133.2 

12:01:47 . 146.2 I I 12:44:47 132.2 

12:02:47 1 __ 14_7_.4_-1---·------!-i ---+---------+--12_:4_5_:4_7--+--_13_3_.4___, ___ --1 

12:03:47 I 147.8 12:46:47 134.4 ! -~~~~--------:~----~------~~~~~~~~~------- 12:04:47 145.2 I 12:47:47 134.1 I 

12:05:47 142.8 12:48:47 134.2 

12:06:47 143.0 ~ 12:49:47 134.5 

12:07:47 141.8 12:50:47 135.5 

12:08:47 141.5 12:51 :47 135.5 

12:09:47 141.0 I 12:52:47 135.5 

12:10:47 140.4 12:53:47 136.4 

12:11:47 140.6 12:54:47 136.2 

12:12:47 140.9 12:55:47 135.7 

12:13:47 140.5 Average 137.5 

12:14:47 139.7 

12:15:47 139.6 ~----~--------~----------~----r------~----~-------~--·-----1 12:16:47 1 140.0 

12:24:47 138.3 

12:25:47 116.4 

12:26:47 113.4 

12:27:47 121.1 

12:28:47 ! 128.0 

12:29:4 7 135.4 

12:30:47 136.4 ! 

12:31:47 136.2 

12:32:47 138.0 

12:'33:47 i 138.3 

12:34:47 137.5 ! i 

12:35:47 137.7 I 

12:~:47 136.7 ~---+~~-----~'------~---~'-----~'---~~ 12:37:47 i 136.4 I ! I : I 

Page 1 
. : . .:..VE.LOCITY TRAVERSE DATA·· .-

~\ ,: -i;;~.,~~~,,; ,. . .PJ'(OJ~CT~ ·.¢p03· (5711/1 

LOCATION -----~---~'-(Qiij~---­

SOURCE~~~~~~~~--------

DUCT DATA 

Dlst from far wall 

to outside of port 31 in 

Nipple length ~ in 

Depth of duct .:z.;!i In 

Width of duct(rec) In 

Area of duct ~.a~ ··In 

LOCATION OF TRAVERSE POINTS 

Distance upstream of disturbance 

0 .!!! 1.0 1.5 2.0 1.0 l.S 2.0 

b ·~ 24 Duct > 24

t;;Juct . . 1 : 20 24" 20 . < 24" . I: E! 16 16 

~ j . 12 12 

84 s 6 7 8 8

4 56 7 8 

Distance downstream ITom disturbance 

CIRCULAR DUCTS 

Traverse 

point (Percent of stack diameter from 

number Inside wall to traverse eolnt} 

on a 

diameter 2 4 6 8 10 12 

1 14.6 6.7 4.4 3.2 2.6 2.1 

2 85.4 25.0 14.6 10.5 8.2 6·.7 

3 75.0 29.6 19.4 14.6 11.8 

4 93.3 70.4 32.3 22.6 17.7 

5 87.4 67.7 34.2 25.0 

6 95.6 80.6 65.8 35.6 

7 89.5 77.4 64.4 

8 96.8 85.4 75.0 

9 91.8 82.3 

10 97.4 88.2 

11 93.3 

12 97.9 

RECTANGULAR DlJCTS 

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 

1 25.0 16.7 12.5 10.0 8.3 7.1 6.3 5.6 

2 75.0 50.0 37.5 30.0 25.0 21.4 18.8 16.7 

3 63.3 62.5 50.0 41.7 35.7 31.3 27.8 

4 87.5 70.0 58.3 50.0 43.8 38.9 

5 90.0 75.0 64.3 56.3 50.0 

6 91.7 78.6 68.8 61.1 

7 92.9 81.3 72.2 

a 93.8 83.3 

9 94.4 

10 

11 

12 

METHOD 1 

DATE . )z/lt / IJ ·3 

PERSONNEL~Jd~~·,-~~-----------------

Equivalent diameter 

2 x deeth x width 

depth + widt.h 

Traverse 

Point 

·1 

2 

3 

4 

5· 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

10 11 12 

5.0 4.5 4.2 

15.0 13.6 12.5 

25.0 22.7 20.8 

35.0 31.8 29.2 

45.0 40.9 37.5 

55.0 50.0 45.8 

65.0 59.1 54.2 

.75.0 68.2 62.5 

85.0 77.3 70.8 

95.0 86.4 79.2 

95.5 87.5 

95.8 

Dist from ports to 

nearest disturbance 

up- downstream 

ft. 1!>.;2 ,I 

dla 3 C, 

stream 

/P-0 ,, 

3.(.,., 

. MEASUREMENTS 

Distance Distance 

%of from Inside from outside 

Diameter wall of port 

2. l O.(t, '3. tD 

lt,.'7 l ,q c..{.~ 

({ . 'S j ."? (o.3 

1/.~ ~.D ~-0 

~'5". 0 7.o tO.D 

3~·.lo (C).Q \'"'=3 . 0 

fo t.f • t./ t1.'i '2o.q 

/~.() d.. I g.l{.o 

~ ;;l. ~ Q'3.D d.fo.D 

~~·d ;; '(.7 ;)/./ 

'1"3·3 :Jtn. I d-q. I 

~C) .C) fh,c( 3o .tf 

E. ROBERTS ALLEY & ASSOCIATES 
LOCATiON 

$0tJRCI! 

'RLtN No 

r.Jf\TE -~ lt.·;f::!"...;Cl: ,,.., i... PROBE 1.0./LENGTI-I ~~.! :"~!\ t!\: ;":..\?jt~ LINER MTL t i FITOT 1.0./CO!!:FF !I 

~.L' :; SAMPL~ 1.0. U. · 

·-----·-1=.Z d. 

,.,u,. cadi.~ mcrn,..,-•"c-" 

o""ya .. n, -J6 · C~IQa:-11 tm•f•~!•~'i'• 1\el 

NUr .. cJ"h1 ;t,(, 

' 

_,-h-....... ~~~~-·-

-.--,.-·-·--
r'"'"' caw~ O<.-t"r.-o-neo" 

ctJ,....,.cr.,.,., • .,t. C!l~rt;tort fflt~.., ... ,.,-

Nll.r-age~~n, 'f,l. 
. CONSOU~ f.f}. 

~~~-::'~~f(~· 

1-f ·n~ METER Cl7 (Y) 

_ ~J"!~- ; 1 . v ) I\ t' t DELTA H@ 

_flVfL(N{t f\L PROB!:·I.D./LEHGTH 

);., iL IV i\,~f'W!UNER MTl 

~_:;.~.. 

PITOl'I.D./COE:FF !\ 

-,.-....:'..::__~~-

SAMPL~ 1.0. . 

TeST PEP.SC:1NNEL ~(" ill_~j I.J THERMO J.D. 

TRAVERSE 

POINT 

hiUfvlBER 

SAfvWLE CLOCK 

TIME liME 

. (Min.) 

NOZZLE 1.0./0IA 

VEl.OCITYd 

PRESSURE 

(OP). 

STATIC PRESS \ill Hg) 

LEAl{ CHECJ<S 

SAMPLE TR.~IN 

DHY GAS 

fvtETER 

R!::t\OJHG 

PRETEST 

o •CC.::!;;:>re 

@ f ,:>,1--! In 

-(}.ptX\ 

ST.t\C 

TEMP 

{uF) 

MIDPOINT 

w 

----

_In 

-----

PROBE 

TEMP 

ClF) 

POSTTEST 

0 .. (.)t:'O n ~· g;ifln ..-

---- --

FILTER 

BOX TEMP 

(\If) 
Method 4 - Sample Recovery Data 

" Client ff\ f_;, .\ 1 "?). \'". ( k\ ·1,\r Project# ~:): .. ("\ 3 C" -7// 1.:+ 

location ·rl L.;~ t:z0(€ ·P. L Date J;) -II 

,_,. 

- c.· ~ 

Source !: , ln l:i1•:l i ·~ t -~1?\..fc"f-- Analy~t Sc 

Run No. 0 i Sample I.D. S:~3 

lmpinger 1 . 2 3 4 5 6 7 Total 

Contents I ;) '? c I ;,./?{J t74~P·Ii/ (~-(fie 1":.. 

Fmai I=?,~ / Q 'X-· ":l :Jgi ;; ... ,~ 

Initial lc ~ ;c, () 6 ~ 'i.E' 

Gain 

• .9er Coior -- c l_.(--/1 .fi'?> )~ Labeled? J ,!-

~~Gel Condition (:Co i-:J . Sealed? J ..,.. 

!Run No. ," -) ~) Sample 1.0. .-... s~ y ~" 

lmpinger 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Total 

Contents· fA i C' H-,u· ,.~ 5,/,(11., t' h,,.,.'-/ ~ 

Anal /.~:t(/ / .//) -~ w6o25· I 

Joiiiai '//) {.' /0 t:.r C> -.:Os,. :.-, 

Gain 

lmpiJiger Color (( c·;4, iZ. Labeled? ·.._,/_. 

Siliaa Gel Condition (;'ocJr l Sealed? 1/ 

. 

,. .. , ,.-, 

RUD No. .r:~ 

{ Sample l.D. ~ _ _) 

·" 

lmpinger 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7. Total 

Contents 1--:1 ) u I l"(, L4 [t'~p-1 ... ,.· 5; /. ( ~ 

FmaJ -· I I 

Initial I Po /OCJ () 

Gain I 

Impinge r Cot or {'( t~~~ /2 Labeled? I 

v' 

.... ~inca Gel Condition c;tl() ri Sealed? v· 

!Chain of Custody Complete? i 

...... ; .,;.,•' -', Date t":J..•· ,,. t'~ - .~ 

!Prepared By: sr Date I;;#" #·-o ~ 

-........_) 

METH004 E. ROBERTS ALLEY ASSOCIATES 
. £ 

·oil·$ ~)~A~~i~~i~· .· -~ ' .. '. ' : ' 

:•..j· ·.· 

*}' 

. -~· . 

• • •• t 

.· .. 

•!· '•' 

. '··· 

:Ambh~nt:n~·e6k ; ·. 

: ... ,, ... , ·.: .. ; .. ·:~~~~~·&_ ... ~-.ta~:li? · 

:,-

.;;': ·.' 
CYCLONIC FLOW OAT A 

CLIENT (\1 on@..!!! b. :t~ \..e SOURCE e1 Ill\. N1et't,., PROJECT NO. eloo'3 ~ 2fl fJ 

DATE rz]t t {o3 ALLEY PERSONNEL_:S~\lf-!JQO~S~'-=------DUCT DIMENSION-----

AREA PJTOT ID # AVG COEFFICIENT BAR. PRESSURE----

SAMPLE RUN# 0( RUN# RUN# 

POINT ANGLE <I> L1P ·ANGLEd> AP ANGLE <I> L1P 

1 ., 

2 <-

3 3 

4 v 

5 I 

6 0 

7 5 

8 :2 

9 I 

10 0 

11 D 

12 (./ 

13 3 

14 h 

15 '7 

16 ·to 

17 ~ 

18 

19 " (p 

20 D 

21 ~ 

22 I 

23 0 I 

24 j '( I 

25 

ill 

26 

27 

28 

29 

30 

Cyclonic Flow E. Roberts Alley & Associates 
. . ~. . ·;.; 0 ::0.: \': .. 

-'·r::·!{.•·()~.:F -:J· ... :~, 

~\~····: 0 

._;': .::·Yi '('J:~~, '· .. :<' .. ,!~ ·~~~~~~~~~~~-~~~~~~~!~~~~~~~~i!ll!lll~!lll~li~~~~~i=~~~~i~ •. ,'·; . :"': • ~~:,I 

b 

••••••• 0 

:-.·: 

··.· 

0 ·.~. 

'•,. 

1 

2 

3 

4 

.5 

6 

:{ 

.a 

~ 

-10'· 

3_~ 

·1,2 

f( ... 

i~:· 

t·1· 

if2'•'" 

.2. 

~~·:o.' 

i'S.:.C) 

' ·~· ... ', 

,_ .. 
METHOD _5 _____ 1SOKINETIC FIELD DATA 

• CONSOL= I.D. 

GLIENT Mo J.e_MET::R CF (Y) 

PROJECT# 

LOCATION 

(....0 c. '"3 ... o -z 'l A DELTA H @ 

F" 1 .: fl I PR::)SE J.D./LENGTH 

SOURCE __.._t_. e.;v- ___ UN: R MTL 

RUN NO. --=c.;:......:/.._ ___ PITOT 1.0./COEFF DATE ___,__/ C--=-.L,/_1_1 +)....:;c-...:"3:.-_ SAMPLE 1.0. 

TEST PERSONNEL __ TH:RMQ LD. 

IRAVERSE 

POINT 

NUMBER 

SAMPLE CLOCK 

TIM= TIME 

(Min.) 

A I D 

7... '2...5 

3 s 

'-( 1·5 

lib ,t...} 

-7 rf 

) J7 .) 

c, 7.CJ 

(0 '2."t.) 

It 2 S" 

,.., '1..(-5 

f? J -'JO 

L 1z. . ..; 

·; 

i '31.5 

5. 'i 0 

'fl.-'S 

-l 45' 

lf 7 .S' 

5o 

to 5t....i 

lJ 5$ 

11- 5"1. 

.. '{:, .. : :::•.:'?::-;::::;:{ TOTAL 

. :·::?:\:::··:' ::·:.· .. ,:--:·:: ... ,.. 6 C) 

K Factor = I • 1 1 

I I I I 

I I 

I 

I 

NOZZi..E 1.0./DIA 

VELOCITY 

PRESSURE 

(DP) 

(in. H70} 

1_._!1_1 

J us' 

I. q•; I. lf 0 

f. )0 

/.50 

1, 'io 

1.41 

1.4 5' 

l. 

( t () 

I. 5o 

t.so 

Lt..\ 1 

\.40 

j. 40 

\. ')(J 

\. '1 S' 

\. 5b 

\.C.SO 

'· )$ Ave sqrt(DP) 

J. Y?'l 

TEMP. 

1 . 2 l I . BARO PRESS (in Hg) 

PIL- a I /1 1 STATIC PRESS (in Hg) 

A-f,.s LEAK CHECKS 

P-:AJ;.IJ'-1 SAMPLE TRAIN 

- lft:tS' 

T · o I PiTOT TUSE 

M.sn -_()>LO. 

ORIFICE 

PRESSURE 

{DH) 

cte> 

l t'l 

I (, J 

J. b I 

J. 

I· 6 ·1 

f. 6., 

], 6-1 

j._h--; 

I. \ 

/.)> 

J. S'cJ 

'· "35" 

1.75 

1. 1 

I. 6 I 

l '5'S 

\. 

1. b1 

1.b1 

J. "' 

L 

_l s (J 

AveDH 

J. 51() 

-j:"s o 

DRY GAS 

MSTER 

READING 

Vm 

c.>3 

i'h1· h11 9' -<, 'Z Lfj 

9 ''· 3 j) 

'la-z., 

en 1. "'l 1aa 

q-pL b 'I 0 

¥16.1'11 

971./ OSf 

c;.-,q. 

S? 

v72-. OiO 

4' i "l, • ., 1)-\ 

1lll 

<;0"1.. 

qq '-I'L' oor..t 

<'ittl. 5'64-

"". --; "i 4 1-tt01 

Total Vm 

37. 371..-

if 6 o 

30 . c;4t,f 

1 o.zo 

PRETEST Ml.Q.eOINT POSTTEST 

Cl.cJcA W ft'' o. tJ elf> ft" 

® lO in - in t.S in 

_. o tc_ -- ol<.. 

T:MP 

('F) 

....., }I 

11l' 

?,10 

'7,o1 

"'3o5 

1.,i'1 

I 1-'l<if 

1. qo 

13lJ 

1.t<fJ 

1..12 

2'71.. 

'11) 

3o'i 

1_...'1 1 

16r;; 

1B} 

l-'11 

'l.f4 

PROBE· 

TEMP 

('F) 

I 

t."'dt 

t.-"'4-l 

-r.>a 

z.so 

1..:)1 

t,$'-1 

t,..)O 

v/1 

-z, 

'Lfl 

57... 

1.. $'I 1-St> 

'l,"{C( 

l:so 

7.-s 1 

z.5 I 

-z. :;o 

Flue Gas Composition 

Oxygen.% 

Fll TER 

BOX Ti::MP 

("F) 

I -tS'I 

-z.o.ll 

"L'fj 

l'llfJ 

7-S""Z.. 

2,'/1 

l,J 

7..'5'1 

z$Z 

-z,SD 

'Z-5'3 

oz'S''Z. 

'-SJ 

"7...51 

-z_n_ 

"l.l/1 

'Z. t.J"i 

z >2 

-z.;) I 

Delta H = (Delta Pl!893.94l(Cpl2CFDAl2<Delta H@)(Onl2\Tm+450> 

(Ts+460) Carbon Dioxide, % 

-.,.)-1 Nitrogen,% 

-"----·-

lsoKINFTir. nllT.I\ c:-ucc'T" 
METHOD ~ ISO.{INETIC Fl A ~~,A._, 1: le-- CONSOLE i.D. 1.010 tJ§o METER CF (Y) o.'197 AMBIENT TEMP. 

7.. o(!.."J- o"ll\ II DELTA H@ t.'Lil Bll.RO PRESS (in Hg) ·30 . .,_,_ Ftc~ A\ PROBE 1.0./LENGTH P,t_-o t/J 1 STATIC PRESS (in Hg) to. Jg E".. c..c. c, tc._.,. LINER MTL I tl!:!/~ LEAK CHEC~<:S PRETEST MIDPOINT POSTTEST 

c:--z.. PITOT f- o I La. a·VJ n ... L _te tJ. 000 ft.) 1.0./COEFF SAMPLE TRAIN o.ooo 

l"t. Lll Lc.3 ~1z. /0 SAMPL::: 1.0. @ in ./ in ~.r in ~ 'o o THERMO J.D. 7- c;_,/ PITOT TUBE 0~ / ok... 

-

NOZZLE 1.0./DIA ./i7 

TRAVERSE SAMPLE -CLOCI< VELOCITY DRY GAS STACK PROBE FILTER 

POINT TIME TIME PRESSURE PRESSURE METER TEMP TEMP BOX TEMP 

NUMBER (Min.) (DP) {DH) ("F) (uF) (uF) 

(in. H20) (ff) 

~-----7-----+--~---+-----+--~~~------~~~~----+-~~~~~----+-~~-4~~L--+~~-

~----------~~~~~--~~~~~------~--~~----+--~~~~---+~~~~~~~~~-7

~----~----;-~~--~--~~~~~------4-~~~---+--~~~~----+-~~-+~~--~~~-

-----~----;-~~--~--~~~~~------4-~~~--~--~~~~----~~~-+~~~;-~~--+

fi-----~----;-~.~--~------lr-~~~------4-~~~--~---L~~~----~~~-+~~~;-~~

,-~----~---;~~~--~----+---~~--------+-~~~----~~~~~=-----+-~~~r-~----r-~~-

~~~~----;-~~~-~--~~~~~------4-~~~---+--~~~~·----+-~~-+--~=-;-~~

~----~~--~r-~~--~----+---~~~------+-~~~----~~~~~------+-~~--r-~~--~~~--+-~

g-----~~---r~~--1------~--~~~----~--~~~--~--~~~~----+-~~-+~~~-r~~--~

~~~----+---~~------~~~~---+--~~~----~~~-~~~--~~~~-

~----~----+--------~--~~~~~------4--L~~---+--~~~~----+-~~-+~~--,_~~--+-

r-------~---4--~~--~----+---~~~------+-~~~----~~~~~~----+-~~--~~~--~~~--

~----~-----;--~~--~----~~~~--------+-~~~----~--~~~~----+-~~--r---~---r-~~--+

6o 

Delta H = <Delta Pl(8~.~(Cpl CFDAli<Delta H@lCDnl2<Tm+460l 

(Ts+460) 

ISOKI ETIC DATA SHEET 

Flue Gas Composition 

Oxygen,% 

Carbon Dioxide, % 

Nitrogen,% 

E. RO
IVIETI-tUU _.....r."' __ ISOKI~ETIC FIELD DATA 

_.., CONSOLE 1.0. f\'tc~l-.. /J Je METER CF (Y) 

'Z.-ee'?. - c; u A DELTA H@ 

_E.l r..-e.~ ltl PROBE 1.0./LENGTH ~ J 

t= • Govl·vc LINER ~TL __ .:::::0:....:"3:_ ___ PITOT i.O.iCOEFF 

.---!1-..:1-:::....L-/ ~\.\:_r) ~o3.:::....__ SAMPLE 1.0. 

TEST PERSONNEL --F...uf'r~.~.-.~ ~·0:;..;.:0 __ THERMO 1.0. 

,----. j 

TRAVERSE 

POINT 

NUMBER 

SAivlPLE 

TIME 

(Min.) 

CLOCK 

TIME 

NOZZLE 1.0./DIA 

VELOCITY 

PRESSURE 

(OP) 

(in. H20) 

1t)1Q 

__ c ..... ,_,_. _..'1....:.Cf-:-'7 __ AMBIENT TEMP. 

_1.."""--z.._~_l -:---~ BARO PRESS (in Hg) 

l'tl-ct /3 1 STATIC PRESS (in Hg) 

.....---'5::;_f.__;'..vL':--=-s __ LEAK CHECKS P~o/ /a· ivf SAMPLE TRAIN 5'13~ PRESSURE 

(DH) 

(ft') 

DRY GAS 

METER 

READING 

t.J. 2. 

u 

_3~-'=«~~--------­

t o. l't 

PRETEST MIDPOINT POSJTEST 

0. CJGo ft... ..- ft:J CJ • ~(., 

@ S. 0 In --:::;::=--in l . s· in 

a ok 

STACK 

TEMP 

(liF) 

PROBE 

TEMP 

("F) 

FILTER 

BOX TEMP 

(F} 

m--~~-----r--~--~~~-+-~~~------1-----~---~-~~~~---~~~~-+--~~~--~~

M----~-----r~~--~----+---+~~------~--~~~-+--~uw~~----+-~~-r~~~~~~~

~----~----~--~---~----+-~~~------1---~~~--~-~~~~----r-~~-+--~~-7~~-

~-----~-----;-~~--+------+---~~-----~-~~~--;---~~~~----r-~---+~~~~~

.-------~----~~~~~-----+--~~~-------~--~~----~---~~~~----r-~~-+~~~~~~

~----~----~~~----r-------+--~~~------~--~~----r----~~~~-------~~~-+~~~~~

r-----~-----r--~,_~------+--~~~------~~~~----~---~~~~----r-~~-+~_.=-~---~

A------~----+-~~--~---~~--~~------+---~~---+----~~~L---+-~~--+--~---r~~~

~-----~------r--~--~------+----~~-------~--~~-----~---~~~~----r-~~-+~~~~~

ft-----~-----+--~~-+------+------~~--------~---~~~--+----~~~~--------+-~~~~~~~-1~~

H-~~~------r~~~~------+------~~--------1----~~------+-----4~~~~---~~~-+~~~~~

~------=---~~---~~~--------+----~~-------~----~~----~---'~~~----r-~---+~~=-

n·-----~------r--~~~-----+--~~~~----~--~~~--+---~~~~~---+-~~-+~----~---~~~--

~---------------r---~~-r-----+-------~~~----~--~~L---r---~~~~~--r-~~-+~~~~--~=

~------~-----+-~~~~~----t-----~~~----+---~~~~--~~~~~--~~~-r~~~,_~

~----~-----r~~---r-----+--~~~~-------~--~~----r---_u~~~L---r-~~-+--a=~~---~

._-··-----~--~~~~~-------+------~~~----~---~~----~--~~~~~---r-~~-+~~~~--~--~-

H------------~--~~~~--~-----~~-------4-~~~-----~--~~~~~L-----~~~-+~~~-+~~~-

K Factor = l • ( 

£a 

DP) 

--:) 

Ave sqrt(DH) 

I. LL"S 

Delta H = !Delta P)(893.94lfCpl2CFOA)2CDelta H@lfDn>2<Tm+460l 

(Ts-+460) :(c:-u ,.,...,,.?l ~t.-JL ISOKINETIC DATA SHEET o.~ Flue Gas Composition Oxygen,% Carbon Dioxide, % Nitrogen,% 

E. 
Method 3 - Gas Analysis Data 

client _ __p.;{)to:..=:M:.::;..:O=ca:.:..qc...;...;.~-~---'--~-=--­ Location/Piant_~~~' s-Dwft.e~tllL=J~, A~l:-.--­

Source _ __jk:~·~, \~cL.:~I:2t1 ~· '!!!ft• c:#l'~C.~co~\.t:::...!.'i_ ~ 

Run Number _ _..;;;.__.__ D I __ _ 

Analyst ~r-\ ------ Date 12 (,, 0 3' 

Analytical Method C,t ,. ,'~:==< 

Leak Check Good? {circle one)~ No 

Analysis Percent C02 Percent Total Percent 0 2 Percent N2 

Number Analysis Time (A) (B) (B- A) (100-8) 

1 ~~·4s 0 .... ?/.0 ~ 

2 0 ., Zf .-,4 

3 n '-.... Zf ..-,q 

Average n """ 

'2.. (. 0 '7~ 

Run Number 0'2 _....=;..-=---- Leak Check Good? (circle one~$/ No 

Analysis 

Number Analysis Time 

1 

2 

3 

Run Number~tu:::;.J_,"'----- Leak Check Good? (circle one)(§) No 

Analysis Percent C02 Percent Total Percent 0 2 Percent N2 

Number Analysis Time (A) 

1 0 

2 n 

3 0 

Average () 

Acceptable differences for repeat analysis: 

if C02 > 4% then +/- 0.3% 

if C02 < or= 4% then +/- 0.2% 

if 0 2 > or= 15°/o then +/- 0.2% 

if 0 2 < 15% then +/- 0.3% 

(B) 

... "-~' 

(8- A) (100- B) 

~7 "7C} zl -~q 

21 "1'1 -...... , ~ ..... J.o ~C) ...... ( 

Ambient Check 

Oxygen _..,:!2~1.:-:. o=----

Carbon Dioxide 0 

Report all values to the nearest 0.1 percent for Orsat Analysis. Report all values to the 

nearest 0.5 percent for Fyrite-Analysis. 

Comments 

Method 3 E. ROBERTS ALLEY & ASSOCIATES 
CYCLONIC FLOW DATA 

CLIENT ~CJtqC~ {\v SOURCE (.(.;_\"' ~w PROJECT NO. :Jcp'3 · 7tiA 

DATE ('7./ U I O'? ALLEY PERSONNEL ____;;,'Sl..;._~..;-~ ,li:;;.Q...;:;O ______ DUCT DIMENSION-----

AREA ____ PITOT ID # ____ AVG COEFFICIENT ____ BAR. PRESSURE ___ _ 

SAMPLE RUN# 0{ RUN# RUN# 

POINT ANGLE <b 6P ANGLE$ ~p ANGLE<!> 6P 

1 _t; i 

2 <.o { 

3 4 I 

4' 5 ' I 

5 l I 

6 J \ I I 

7 0 \ 

8 3 

9 7 

10 s I 

11 v I 

12 5 ~ { 

13 '-I 

' 14 s- i 

15 lJ, I 

16 /.':) 

j 

I 

17 a 

l t 

18 ;~ \ 

\ 

19 ........ 

' ..... t. l 

20 0 ~ 

21 ~I ~ i 

22 .:5" i 

' 

23 > I 

24 t/ .t 

25 

26 I 

27 

28 

29 

30 

Cyclonic Flow E. Roberts Alley & Associates 
. .. ... ~ 

f;~~~·.·•<: .. :,:~.:~;;· -;:-::..·.~~- .· , ·~/·:-;_::~·:\;~[oc,~ r~i~~~·~:~ATt\ ... · · ..·_, ·_:,· ... ·;.~~jA~~-~ii> ; . ·.· ~ 6~{~:~~: . ; }i,_:::. · ·, ... : .; , ' . . ·;·.) <L .' ' .... · ~~6.iECT # :~l' l'3 t.. .. 7J.h·:.f:_:<::j. --·\ : 

·~ ;~9CAT~o~ .. pt_ .. ·.c'~~f)V(~t· .i.J L . 

SOURCE :.···<;:ps.~. L')R\~)2··· ... .. . . : 

PUCTOATA 

Oist from 1sr. wall 

to oufalde of port (-·/ hi 

Nipple length· . j. 5 · In 

· Depth of duct I Cz c:; ln 

V.Jidth cf duct{rec} -~ ....... ----in 

Area ofduct l.t.f{H5 ··In 

'LOCATION .OF TRAV~SE POlNIS 

Distance upstream of disrurban~ 

.... 111 l.O 1.5 2.0 2.0 l.S · 2.0 1 

o-:: 

i ~ rn~ •' D;?t > ;~ . . . ~~~n • 

1:1 G 16- • 16 . . 

·

9 f . 12 12 . . ~ ... 84 5 6 7 8 8

4 56 7 8 

Distanca do.wnstream from disturbance 

CIRCUL.AR DUCTS 

Traveme 

point (Percent of stack diameter from 

number inside wall to traverne ooint} 

on a 

diameter 2 4 6 8 ]0 l~-

1 14.6 6.7 4.4 3.2 2.6 2.1 

2 85.4 25.0 14.6 10.5 8.2 e.z 

3 75.0 .29.8 19.4: 14.6 11.8 

4 93.3 70.4 32.3 22.6 17.7 

5 87.4 67.7 34.2 25.0 

6 95.6 ·ao:e 55.8 35.6 

7 89.5 nA .64.4 

a 96.8 ~5.4 75.0 

9 9'1.8 82.3 

10 97.4 88 . .2 

11 --=· 93.3 

12 97.9 

RECTANGULAR DUCTS 

2 3 4 5 6 7 a ·9 

25.0 16.7 12.5 10,0 8.3 7.1 6.:3 5.5 

'2 75.0 50.D 37.5 30.0 .25.0 21.4 18.8 '16:7 

3 63.3 62.5 sa.o 41.7 · 35.7 3'1~3 27_.8 

4 87.5 70.0 58.3 50.0 43.8 38.9 

5 9.0.0 75.0 64.3 56.3 50.0 

6 91.7 78.6. 68.8' 61.1 

7 92.9 a··., 1 • ..s 72.2 

8 93.8 83.3 

e 94.4 

10 

1'1 

12 

' 1') . ~ .. ;-..:.: -......., . . • DArE .. _ · . . / ::)" .. / :::: . ...: . ( ... ~ . ..:.'":) · 

PE~~ONN~( .. :;-( [' j;::c. ·~) ·: . . 

'; . . ·. . . ; . 

Equivalent diameter 

2 x depth x width 

depth ~ width 

Traverse 

Point 

·1 

2 

3 

I 

t 4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

I 

1 '10 

'10 11 12 

5.0 4.5 4.2 

15.0 13.6 '12.5 

.25.0 22.7 20.6 

35.0 31.8 29.2 

45.0 40.9 37.5 

55.0 . 50.0 45.8 

ss.o 59.1 54.2 

.i6.0 68.2 62.5 

85.0 77.3 70.8 

e·s.o 86.4 79.2 

95.5 87.5 

95.8 

I 

·oist from ports in 

nearest dlsturbaa 

up-· limtJlr~m a tt··~ 1$. 

dia t?J? .~ 

MEASUReMENTS 

Distance •• %of from inside ~ 

Diameter wall iE 

4. 'i' ..... . ., ... ( l ....... 1-

L- • I . ._J ~ .Lf <·j' 

i : - . 

~i 0 r), 'J ~·y"~ ... "}. s.·c f 

·. )., 

l ~/ . ..)-\··· ~{. Cf r . 

\r-~ 

'7(~ u I/, t~ ...... 

.... ' ·; ~ /St /1 

('7-7 '-i ... ,. ' .i L/, t.; _) '7 (.- I ; 

_..,<:· ~ 

'-·1 .) ' ..., i\ .... 77 .,1 ~ 1-J 

l 

I l 

!. 

~ 


DRY GAS 

l\.t1ETER 

R Ei\0 Il-l f3 

Vrn 

(fl.)) 

OwYQ••"'• -w. l,!ll!'j~~H llll,.jril•t•p, 'kr 

NllHot"llln, q,t. . -~- -· ...... , ... .., __ ---

-;,~-... --

·---~-----

---. -~Fomn
Method 3- Gas Analysis Data 

Client _..LJ)\.o~:.~t.NL-=::::.';;...;' ~=---.....;~;....Jo· t~\xi""i---- Location/Piant __ £I.Jot.-J ... O.u:r.N=.I.C•W~+' .:..A""', <olaM-__ _ 

Source __ ....J12~tlr...l'~~~o"=~.P~!(_· ____ _ 

Run Number b I 

Analysis 

Number Anal sis Time 

2 

3 

Run Number f)? -~----

Analysis 

Number 

2 

3 

Anal sis Time 

Run Number D ~ 

Analysis Percent C02 

Number Analysis Time A 

1 

2 

3 

Acceptable differences for repeat analysis: 

if C02 > 4% then +/- 0.3% 

if C02 <or= 4% then +/- 0.2% 

if 0 2 > or = 15% then +/- 0.2% 

if 0 2 < 15% then+/- 0.3% 

Analyst _:S..;;::...;.l4~--­

Date f z1 t2/o3 

Analytical Method QtM ,,('A v 

Leak Check Good? (circle one~ No 

Percent Total 

8 

Leak Check Good? (circle one)(~ No 

0 

0 

0 

Leak Check Good? (circle one) t!{ii) No 

Ambient Check 

Oxygen 21 -~----

Carbon Dioxide f) ------

Report all values to the nearest 0. 1 percent for Orsat Analysis. Report all values to the 

nearest 0.5 percent for Fyrite Analysis. 

Comments 

Method 3 E. ROBERTS ALLEY & ASSOCIATES 
CYCLONIC FLOW OAT A 

CLIENT ~~}'lt,/\!ttJlL"' -\, U. SOURCE <8 \>t\lfl \( 

DATE {2../ r.t/o ~ ALLEY PERSONNEL - 'R. 0: SL. .. 

PROJECTNO. ~-71tA 

DUCT DIMENSION-~=:;..._ __ _ 

AREA ~ PITOT ID #'D-o<...{ AVG COEFFICIENT 0 ·~ BAR. PRESSURE ~ 

SAMPLE RUN# Ci RUN# RUN# 

POINT ANGLE <t> ilP ANGLE~ 6.P ANGLE <I> ~p 

1 <!) D 

2 2. (), s3 '$' 0."5 

4 t) D 

5 b 0 

6 t (') . I 

7 D D 

8 D t-:"'\ .._.., 

9 3 D ~ 

10 ~ 0 I 

11 0 0 

12 y 0.~ 

13 0 0 

•J4 s 0.~ 

15 7 0,-:z - 16 r..{ n . ..:> 

17 0 (} 

18 -~ D.;J 

19 lr') 0 

20 0 () 

21 • r i t) . f ..... I 

22 I 

1 0.;) 

23 3 I!). ~ 

24 I i..f tJ , 

f 

25 I 

26 

27 

28 

29 

30 

Cyclonic Flow E. Roberts Alley & Associates 
__ _tt.. &b&LLLLcL .... -.. ~t _ m.i'ILL.LL.ifSILJ.L.Lli!!!l.!!WLL ... - L ... &L .. &LL&a:& __ -· _g _.&&£.& 

E. ROBERTS 

INCORPORATED APPENDIXC 

LABO·RATO:RY DATA 
Method 5 Laboratory ~ta 

Facility Name: Project Number: ,j?cJo3 .. Q'J If 4 . . 

Source: Ktln N\D,J n Date: 1 ?.../u lo ~ 

Run Number: I) Filter Number: -f'l ~~3 

Liquid Levels Marked- (2 I N 

.A.mount of Liquid lost during transport: ·-.u:.WL.JA:L....-. ___________ _ 

Filter Analvsis 

Initial filter weight (mg): d54. ~. 

Final filter weight (mg); {}.t;l.o ~~7.o - - ;)c;?. (.) 

Mass collected (mg): ti).~ 

Probe/Nozzle Rinse ...!\nalvsis 

Actone·Volume (ml): l;)} sInitial Beaker weight (g): 1.1570, l· ~570, - - L ~7s:_?q 

Final Beaker weight (g)~ 1· 7LP~ I J.1lfl'LI = f, ](,-;I 

Mass collected (mg): 1.-'d 

Blank Correction (mg): 

--=" Adjusted mass collected (mg): ._., 

--?"o~f =- fQ.U "" \V\·o t'·' f.' 

Condensable Analvsis 

Container Volume \ J• 

Initial Beaker weight (g): -

Final Beaker weight (g): ~ = 

Mass collected (mg): ~ Blank Correction (mg): ~---........_ 

--..... 

Adjusted mass collected (mg): ··, .... ~-

~ 

c:\\MyDocuments\Uploads\M5-2002Lab.A.nalysis E. Robens Alley P....:sociates, Inc. 
Method 5 Laboratory D~ta 

Facility Name: Project Number: doo3 ~ 07114 

Source: Date: t? / 1t / o--;:. 

Run Number: 0~ Filter Number: -#50> f' 

Liquid Levels Marked - 6i) I N 

.Amount of Liquid lost during transport: ._11~11:----------------

Filter _.c\nalvsis 

Initial filter weight (mg): 

Final filter weight (mg): 

Mass collected (mg): 

Probe/Nozzle ·runse Analvsis 

Actone·volume (ml): 

Initial Beaker weight (g): 

Final Beaker weight (g): 

Mass collected (mg): 

Blank Correction (mg): 

Adjusted mass collected (mg): 

Condensable Analvsis 

;;Jtr;/.tp ;)5/. ¥? 

3.o 

I'd o 

( :J.L(~ ~ 

'. 7cs-33 

\'.d. 

! ·7lfl< I 

f. 7s-33 

Container Volun1e ~· 

Initial Beaker weight (g~ ~~-. ......,_ Final Beaker weight (g): 

Mass collected (mg): 

""""'"'~-,--

Blank Correction (mg): 

..t\djusted mass collected (mg): 

c:\IJ\.1yDocuments\Uploads\1Vf5M2002LaoAnalysis 

/. 7'-{~ J 

----- /-7S33 

E. Roberts A.Hey A.ssociates 1 Inc. 

..;:>' 
Method 5 Laboratory D~ta 

Facility Name: Project Number: dQc3 .. DJII4 . . 

Source: Date: 12(11/o 3 

Run Number: o3 Filter Number: 5-=--~....:S":;..._.. __ _ 

Liquid Levels Marked - (jj) I N 

.A.mount of Liquid lost during transport: . ....L!:.>I.!..IA:~------------

Filter Analvsis 

Initial filter weight ( mg): as /.q 

Final filter weight (mg): ~s-4. ~ ::Jslf.q ..-- - Q)S" C./., 

Mass collected (mg): ~.o 

Probe/Nozzle ·runse Anal:ysis 

Actone·Volume (ml): 1~5. 

Initial Beaker weight (g): l.ILfiS. { .{l(({~ - l' 7ttf5 

Final Beaker weight (g): £. '7'5lS f. 7<tl'i = l·7~1~ 

Mass collected (mg): ~·0 

Blank Correction (mg): 

......::> Adjusted mass C?oll~cted (mg): _,. 

--?"o~f:: (.p. 0 ~~ l'.: t~ .~ 

Condensable Analvsis 

Container Volu..me 

Initial Beaker weight (g): = 

Final Beaker weight (g): ~- -

Mass collected (mg): ~ ~.~ 

Blank Correction (mg): -."-..... 

-'-

~ ...... 

~-<\djusted mass collected ( mg): --.... ................. 

'"'-·-...... 

c:\\MyDocuments\Up1oads\M5-2002LabAnalysis E. Roberts Alley .A.ssociates, Inc. 
Method 5 Laboratory D~ta 

Facility Name: Project Number: ;?Do:; .. 0711 A 

Source: Date: 12../t1!o3 

Run Number: Ol Filter Number: 

Liquid Levels Marked - 6i) I N 

.Amount of Liquid lost during transport: ........... tl ...... ft.___ ___________ _ 

Filter Analvsis 

Initial filter V\reight (mg): c:05'0 I LJ 

Final filter weight (mg): d55.5 ;>s~.s - /)5S". :;r 

Mass collected (mg): . \ 

Probe/Nozzle ·runse Analvsis 

.~.~ctone·volume (ml): lt90 

Initial Beaker weight (g): l. 74~5 l-llf<i~ - l- 7lf].sFinal Beaker weight (g): \.1~1{ 1.151/ ----- - kiSt! 

Mass collected ( mg): 3. d. 

Blank Correction (mg): 

~ 

Adjusted mass collected (mg): _,., 

.,...,.oh-f :: 3 · ~ :J~.J t' 

Condensable Analvsis 

Final Beaker weight (g): 

Container Volume ~ 

Initial Beaker weight (g)~ ~~:----

~~---

~tfass collected (mg): 

Blank Correction (mg): 

Adjusted mass collected (mg): 

c:\\MyDocumems\Upioads\M5-2002LabAnalysis E. Rob:ns All::y Associates, Inc. 
Method 5 Laboratory Dl!J,ta 

Facility Name: . . 

Source: 

Run Number: 

Liquid Levels Marked - 6i) I N 

Project Number: floc3 .. OJ 114 

Date: t2/ulo 3 

Filter Number: 

Alnount of Liquid lost during transport: ·.......u:.M.LZ~~------------

Filter Anaivsis 

Initial filter weight (mg): ~~#~ 

Final filter weight (mg): d.'S" <-i. ~ C)lt;t{.1 --- - ;Js:!f. 3 

Mass collected (mg): o.s 

Probe/Nozzle Rinse ... 4.nal:ysis 

Actone·Volume (ml): I ~o 

Initial Beaker weight (g): l. /J_Y,O l· '7d.'ib - / .. /;;;. t.lo 

Final Beaker weight (g):· l.id.~l1 l . '7d..'vl~ -- = '-~~~~~ 

Mass collected (mg): a.{ 

Blanl< Correction (mg): 

Adjusted mass collected (mg): 

--7 oh-r :: 3~a ! '" fi' 

Condensable Analvsis 

Container Volume ~ 

Initial Beaker weight (g~ Final Beaker weight (g): -~~--,_. ~---

~ssoolle~d~~: ------~---~~-------~ ~-.. 

~-

= 

= 

Blank Correction (mg): 

Adjusted mass collected (1ng): 

c:\\MyDocuments\Uploads\lvf5-2002LabAna1ysis E. Roberts Alley Associates, Inc. 

......, 

.. 
Method 5 Laboratory Di;tta 

Facility Name: Project Number: W3 .. l1] 114 . . 

Source: Date: {2/ 1 t lo?:> 

Run Number: Filter Number: -# ~? ~ 

Liquid Levels Marked - 6i) I N 

Amount of Liquid lost during transport: --£,1;.)/.L....Ifl:.___ ___________ _ 

Filter Analvsis 

Initial filter weight (mg): ~s(, . Lp. 

Final filter weight (mg): d5/.o {j5l· t) - as1. o 

Mass collected (mg): 0·<-l 

Probe/NozzRe Rinse ... 4.naivsis 

Actone·volume (ml):. I dO 

Initial Beaker weight (g): l.i'15'5 /.'1%$'~ - l. fi::5" s 

Final Beaker weight (g): l. 'f=61S l. ']'157'5 -- - 1 E /<ir25' \ 

Mass collected (mg): d. .. o 

Blank Correction (mg): 

....:::0 

Adjusted mass coll~cted (mg): ....:> 

--1o~f:; 9..'-f p1 p ... 

Condensable Analvsis 

Container Volume 

Initial Beaker weight (g): -

Final Beaker weight (g): ~ -

Mass collected (mg): ----~ 

Blank Correction (mg): · ~ -.. 

~--

i\djusted mass collected (1ng): ·· ... ., ... 

. , ................. 

-~ ...... 

c: \ \tviy Documents\ Up I oads\1vf5-2 0 02Lab.Analysis E. Roberts Alley Associates, Inc. 
Method 5 Laboratory D~ta 

Facility Name: Project Number: floo3 .. 02 II 4 . . 

Source: Date: I 2-/ t~ { o3 

Run Number: Dl Filter Number: -t-:1 s-~ (q 

Liquid Levels Marked - 6J I N 

.A.mount of Liquid lost during transport: .-L:Il:WLJfl:'--------------

Filter Analvsis 

Initial filter weight (mg): :J~t.(. 0 

Final filter weight (mg): @ tt4.<6 ~to f.{,~ - ;).{Qf.{. ~ 

Mass collected (mg): tc?. ~ 

Probe/Nozzle Rinse Analvsis 

Actone·Volum.e (ml): ll~ 

Initial Beaker weight (g): I .lltt/'1 f.7~t(4t -- - /. ?(, tf'1 

Final Beaker weight (g): I. 174.'7> l. f)L£'1> - (. 17tl~ 

Mass collected (mg): q·,q 

Blank Correction (mg): 

"'"=' 

Adjusted mass collected (mg): ....,., 

-?o~f ~~·I , .• I· r. 

Condensable Analvsis . 

Container Volume 

Initial Beaker weight (g): -

Final Beaker weight (g): ~ .. - .......... 

Mass coil ected ( mg): ~"' Blank Correction (mg): ~ ....... ............ -.._ 

---........... ~ .. 

Adjusted mass collected (mg): ~ .. , 

~ 

c:\\JvfyDocum:nts\Uploads\M:S-2002LabAnalysis E. Roberr.s Alley A.ssociates: Inc. 
-=" 

Method 5 Laboratory D·~ta 

Facility Name: 

Source: 

Run Number: 

Liquid Levels Marked - 6i) I N 

.t\.mount of Liquid lost during transport: 

Filter Analvsis 

Initial :filter weight (mg): ;Lc;-S I ~ 

Final filter weight. (mg): ~ll. d 

Mass collected (mg): I Ls . \ 

Probe/Nozzle ·runse Analvsis 

Actone·Volume (ml): l'LO 

t 

Initial Beaker weight (g): l . ~~.J.:lGt 

Final Beaker weight (g): J :/"J(pd,. 

Mass collected (mg): {\ .~ 

Blank Correction (mg): 

Adjusted mass coll~cted (mg): 

Condensable Analvsis 

--=foh-f = 

Container Volume (!n~ _ 

Initial Beaker weight (g): ~ -~--

Final Beaker weight (g): 

Mass collected (mg): 

Blank Correction (mg): 

~~djusted mass collected (mg): 

c:\\l'vfyDocumenrs\Uploads\M5·2002Lab.Analysis 

Project Number: ~3 .. fD 11 A 

Date: 

F.ilter Number: ~~-a 1 -..-;;;......::.....----

Q7/. ~ - d/l. d 

l . !Jtlf>J - [_. 7 ';) Vt:J 

I .I'Zud. - \ ./o4»d ---

~7.~ ~ p !' 

....... _ 

. .........._ -. 

E. Roberts Alley Associates, Inc. 

-.:=' 

... 
Method 5 Laboratory D~ta 

Facility Name: Project Number: fJ.oo3 .. Q] uti- . . 

Source: ~r<$5 Pry--<v Date: 12/i-z.. {tJs 

Run Number: 0~ Filter Number: 

Liquid Levels Marked- 6i) I N 

Amount of Liquid lost during transport: ._N~It ______________ _ 

Filter Analvsis 

Initial filter weight (mg): ;).c:; '-(. 7 

Final filter weight (mg); ~ vo,. ';;l dus. a - - :JC!2· ~ 

Mass collected (mg): tt.f.s 

Probe/Nozzle Rinse Analvsis 

Actone·Volume (ml): l:lO 

Initial Beaker weight (g): I.!Cflt3 l.!tfv 1 = L. ?f..{v 1 

Final Beaker weight (g): \.~51'7 l·/~1'7 - l:/~7/ 

Mass collected (mg): l { . t-{ 

Blank Correction (mg): 

--==" Adjusted mass coll~cted (mg): ._, 

-?"o~f = ~.a, .l~ (f ... 

Condensable _4..nalvsis 

Container Volume 

Initial Beaker weight (g): -

Final Beaker weight (g): ~ -

.l\1ass collected (mg): ~ Blank Correction (mg): ......_____ __ ........... ~._._ 

Adjusted mass collected (mg): ···, .... 

................. 

~, ...._ 

c:\\MyDocuments\Uploads\1vf..5-2002LabAnalysis E. Roberts Alley ..A..ssociates, Inc. 
. - ·····-· -- 2 .. . ;;;; ... !!ll!!!ll{!lfiA . - . ·-- - . -· .• &. 

E. ROBERTS 

Aile~& 

Associates 

INCORPORATED 

··- -- .. -· ---- ----- £._ . ... . . . - . 

APPENDIXD 

QUALITY CONTROL DATA 
CARBON MONOXIDE- EPA REFERENCE METHOD 10 

Monarch Tile, Kiln Main 
CARBON MONOXIDE- EPA REFERENCE METHOD 10 

Monarch Tile, Kiln Cooler 

1 - 1 
CARBON MONOXiDE- EPA REFERENCE METHOD 10 

Monarch Tile, Dryer 
OXYGEN- EPA METHOD 3A 

INSTRUMENTAL ANALYSIS CALIBRATION DATA 

Plant ~~c.\o 1\\e 

Date tif I I ( 0 ~ 

Concentration Range 0:-- 2. ot1 tJ 

Location~~Kd~'~\n~~~~~~\~n __________ _ 

Op~~or ____ ~~t~~-----------------

Response Time () fA_'& Q Ill~ "(J .. ~ 

Calibration Accuracy (Accuracy ± 2% of span ) % ----

Gas 

Type 

Cylinder Acrual Analyzer Gas 

Type 

Cylinder Actual Analyzer 

No. Concentration 

ZERO 0.0 

HIGH :;to .o 

ZERO & SPAN SYSTEM BIAS 

GAS 

TYPE 

ZERO 

GAS 

TYPE 

ZERO 

..... 

.. ~#.: ..... , 

GAS 

TYPE 

ZERO 

INITI.A.L FINAL 

RESPONSE RESPONSE 

... J!WITIAl TIMJW. 

FINAL TIME ! • .,.-., ...... ~ 

INITIAL FINAL 

RESPONSE RESPONSE 

No. Concentration 

LO·O 

(Accuracy± 5% of span) ___ % 

(Drift ± 3% of span) o/o 

GAS 

TYPE 

ZERO 

INITIAL FINAL 

RESPONSE RESPONSE 

GAS JNJTlAL FINAL 

TYPE RESPONSE RESPONSE 

ZERO 

rnl'ITW..~E 

~.W.# .. " .ffin9AL:~&re . .. 

GAS IN!Tli\L FINAL 

TYPE RESPONSE RESPONSE 

ZERO 
I 

CARBON DI.OXIDE ·-EPA METHOD 3A 

INSTRUMENTAL ANALYSIS CALIBRATION DATA 

Plant 01ctW~ 7,{£ 

Date IZ/1 I {o3 

Concentration Range () ... \ p !'>o 

Location /q \ n mo i b 

Operator "J t-1 

Response Time 0 ~ ~So ; 

Calibration Accuracy (Accuracy ± 2% of span) % ---

Gas 

Type 

Cylinder Actual Analyzer Gas 

Type 

Cylinder Actual Analyzer 

No. Concentration 

ZERO 0·0 

HIGH 

ZERO & SPAN SYSTEM BIAS 

-~~.# 

GAS 

TYPE 

ZERO 

GAS 

TYPE 

ZERO 

~-# 

GAS 

TYPE 

ZERO 

... :.·.· .. :.~···· 

.F-fN~Tf.¥? 

FINAL 

RESPONSE 

INITIAL FINAL 

RESPONSE RESPONSE 

INITIAL TIME 

. l?&~J7~ ...... --.... 

INITIAL FINAL 

RESPONSE RESPONSE 

No. Concentration 

(Accuracy ± 5% of span) % --- (Drift± 3% of span) % ---

-···· IN~!f:l~·~· 

. RW .. #. Fl~'tr~ ... 

GAS INITIAL FINAL 

TYPE RESPONSE RESPONSE 

ZERO 

I:N·I:rl~TM£ 

RT TKT # .... F .... ·:'rroi:, ·.·~t:~.6 ••• .!' .~r· .... T,.::IME.·.~ .• ·.,·;.. . . . .•• :.'~~.~· •.• : ................ '.. '!-~!'!~ ... .. 

GAS 

TYPE 

ZERO 

-~~-# .. 

INITIAL FINAL 

RESPONSE RESPONSE 

INITIAL TIME 

~ .... F:lN~~Ji~- .. 

GAS INITIAL FINAL 

TYPE RESPONSE RESPONSE 

ZERO 

., 
I 

I 

OXYGEN- EPA METHOD 3A 

INSTRUMENTAL ANALYSIS CALffiRATION DATA 

Location r I C"NZ.-1./1-o<:.. e.. A l 

Date '"L-/tL../ c~ Operator f'Lft:; 

Concentration Range 2 5 % Response Tim.e __ t '_. c_G ______ _ 

Calibration Accuracy (Accuracy ± 2% of span ) % 

Gas 

Type 

ZERO 

Cylinder Actual 

No. Concentration 

0 

Ana1yzer 

0 

HIGH 16. 0 ./ (. 0 

ZERO & SPAN SYSTEM BIAS 

INIT~ tiMli07; .ll<ir 

•n .&~#.0 ~ ' 1

•,. i· • • ..,...l. _....,.,. .......... ~~~ ~ .a.~ .. ;..5:6,... 

GAS INmAL FINAL 

TYPE RESPONSE RESPONSE 

ZERO o. I (:J. I I I J. C[ fv.._,d IJ.Cf 

·- ·- ··· · ..... -.. -. -- · ···-mmAL·1lliv'IE Tr::~' t R~· # ~-:2 .. ~ ............ FINAL tiNffi l_i,o.( .. -.:= ... ·;::• 

GAS INITIAL FINAL 

TYPE RESPONSE RESPONSE 

ZERO o. I o. 1 

M..:ol I 1 . cr I I. o; 

Gas 

Type 

MID 

Cylinder Actual Ana1yzer 

No. Concentration 

( 7_. 0 

(Accuracy ± 5% of span) __ % 

(Drift ± 3 °/o of span) o/o 

. . INITIAiil: ~·(!)f:f'j ... . . ' ,··::M·· ·.~.dt .... ,D.':t ........................... FIN~ ·.'I . .1..{! .. 1.0 

GAS INITIAL FINAL 

TYPE RESPONSE RESPONSE 

ZERO 0. I (), I 

fot,'! I /).9 I J. c; 

RW,N.# __ ..... -...... ·-~. ,~·=·· .. 

GAS . I INITIAL FINAL 

TYPE I RESPONSE RESPONSE 

ZERO I 

I 

l.~#;: .. . iNITIAL TIMlS: 

~·-··- ··- -· FINAL TIME ...... 

mnTJAt. T:IiN!E ~.lJN # .. FINAL ~N.$· 

I GAS INITIAL FINAL 

TYPE RESPONSE RESPONSE 

GAS INITlAL FINAL 

TYPE RESPONSE RESPONSE 

ZERO I ZERO 

I I 

I I 
\ ' 

CARBON DIOXIDE- EPA METHOD 3A 

INSTRUMENTAL ANALYSIS CALIBRATION DATA 

Plant yV\olAO-rc. k_ ~~ .le_ Location ------------+------------ F-"lc~~ A/ 

Date I 'l_ i 

/t 7- &. 

/ C ~ 

Concentration Range __ 2_o_/-=-"'-- 1: 6o Response Time __________ _ 

Calibration Accuracy (Accuracy :t 2o/o of span) ___ o/o 

Gas 

Type 

ZERO 

HIGH 

Cylinder Actual 

No. Concentration 

0 

[( 10 

ZERO & SPAN SYSTEM BIAS 

Ru.N.~:a:~ 

!Nf!FIAL TIME ( ; Cj ~ 

FIN:AL TiME ~· ~.5:"6 

GAS INITIAL FINAL 

TYPE RESPONSE RESPONSE 

ZERO o, I o. l 1:.._. 

~lei. 17-. 0~ \'-.uS" 

.RUN# ~""J INITlAL Tif:\1lE l t: 1" 

.. :FINAL TIME fjo€. 

GAS INITIAL FINAL 

TYPE RESPONSE RESPONSE 

ZERO CJ I \ o. l 

(Ylid fL.. u<) 11... LU 

INITIAL f-lME 

~UN#. .f.:JNAL TI;tY.IE 

GAS ·INITIAL FINAL 

TYPE RESPONSE RESPONSE 

ZERO 

I 

.A.nalyzer 

f(.o 

.. 

I 

j 

Gas 

Type 

MID 

Cylinder Actual 

No. Concentration 

17...(1 

Analyzer 

J?.,. oLJ 

(Accuracy ± 5% of span) % --- (Drift± 3o/o of span) o/o ---

.. litn~t# .. .~?.. ........... ftN~ll?lAL TEME q t S6 .. :Wl'N·:AL TIME . J /. :.'3 o ... 

GAS INITIAL ! FINAL 

TYPE RESPONSE I RESPONSE ! 

ZERO 0· l I 0. ( 

\ I 

- I t-A-•r/ l '"L _c.) ll.. 0¥ 

INITIAL TIME 

RUN# FINAL TIME ... . .. , .. . . 

GAS INITIAL FINAL 

TYPE RESPONSE RESPONSE 

ZERO 

INITIAL TIME 

RUN# Fl~~.TIM£ 

GAS INITIAL FINAL 

TYPE RESPONSE RESPONSE 

ZERO 

! 

l ! 
STEC Gas Divider Calibration 

METHOD 10 

Date: 12/1 0/2003 

Analyzer Type: CAl Model 300P 

Cylinder Gas Concentration 499.4 

CALIBRATION 1 

GAS 

DIVIDER CAL INSTRUMENT DIFFERENCE ERROR 

SETTING GAS READING (PPM) 0/o 

o/o PPM (PPM) 

50 249.7 251.0 1.3 0.5 

30 149.8 149.8 0.0 0.0 

10 49.9 49.4 -0.5 -1.1 

CALl BRA TION DIRECT TO ANALYZER 

CAL INSTRUMENT DIFFERENCE ERROR 

GAS READING PPM o/o 

PPM PPM 

50.2 49.8 -0.4 -0.8 

PROCEDURE: 

CALl BRA TION 2 

INSTRUMENT DIFFERENCE ERROR 

READING (PPM) % 

(PPM) 

251.2 1.5 0.6 

149.7 -0.1 -0.1 

49.3 -0.6 -1.3 

INSTRUMENT DIFFERENCE ERROR 

READING PPM o/o 

PPM 

49.7 -0.4 -0.8 

C

INSTRUMENT 

READING 

(PPM) 

251.0 

149.5 

49.5 

INSTRUMENT 

READING 

PPM 

49.8 

Connect the dilution and high level calibration gases to the SGD-710 gas divider. Connect the outlet to the calibration gas line. FloW the mixed gases accordin

provided in the above tables. Repeat the procedure for three trials. The instrument and calibration gas values must agree within 2% at each gas divider setting 

three trials. An additional mid level calibration gas should be fed directly into the analyzer bypassing the gas divider system. The mid-level calibration gas conc

within 10% of one of the dilution levels tested above. The difference between the mid-level calibration gas and the average Instrument response shall be within 
BOC GASES 

Ill' BOC GASES 600 Union Landing Road 

Rlverton,NJ 08077 

CUSTOMER 

Madison Gas&Gear 

191 COCHRAN ROAD 

PO BOX 130 

MADISON, AL 357580000 

CUSTOMER PO NO: 

Previous Certification Date(s): 

(856) 829 7878 

CYUNDERNO CC95706 

EXJ:'IRATION DATE 22-May-2006 

CERTIFICATION DATE 28-May-2003 

CYUNDER PRESSURE 2000 pslg 

PRODUCT ID NO 24013607 

LOT NUMBER 559540 

ANALYTiCAL iNFORMAT~ON 

ris callbration standard has been certified per the 1997 EPA Traceability Protocol, Document EPA-600/97/121, Using Procedure G1. All Values certified 

be +1·1% NIST Traceable. 

Oompon.ent.S 

JA.fU3oN@.!SX1~E 

3~Y:GEN 

~i)i:R0GcN 

Type 

NTAM 82745X 

SRM 2659A 

LOTIO 

00060503 

71-C-35 

Do ~ot Use This Cylinder below 150 psi g. i.e. 1.0 Megapascal 

iqf~o:~~~r. 

~O.dQ.;~o. 

Bh\·hANOE~.e~s· 

1:9.~!%: 

.,9.9~"% 

CALIBRATiON STANDARDS USED iN ASSAY 

Cylinder No 

XC01B9578 

CAL014654 

Concentration 

19.69 +1- 0.16 % C02/N2 

20.92 +1- 0.11 % 02/N2 

ANALYTICAL INSTRUMENTS USED IN ASSAY 

.I. 

Instrument/Make/Model Analytical Principle 

Last Multipoint 

Calibration 

Siemens SE 00721 

Siemens SE BN805 

NonDispersive Infrared 

Paramagnetic 

02 adjusted for C02 interference based on analytical data. 

A ciivision of The BOC Group, Inc. 

?age: 1 Of 1 .D:. Deiaware Corporatior; QA Approved 

04/30/03 

05/15/03 

;A!f~~v~~ili~ , I ~ ~ I 

·osi2a(o$ 

05/2~JGS 

Expiration 

02/01/04 

07/14/04 
BOC GASES 

~ BOCGASES 1075 CINCLARE DRIVE 

PORT ALLEN.LA 70767 

(225) 388 0900 

CUSTOMER 

Madison Gas&Gear 

19'l COCHRAN ROAD 

HUNTSVILLE. AL 358240000 

CUSTOMER PO NO: 

·~revious Certification Date{s)~ 

~ . 

...... 

r~E~:W.:tt$tiA:t,!ii· ·OF t&NiAL:Y:S:Jts .;;i-· 

· , · · .~i?.:; f;-:op,pcq:J. G~~ .... · · ... 

CYLINDER NO 

EXPIRATION DATE 

CE.RTIFICATION DATE 

CYLINDER PRESSURE 

PRODUCT 10 NO 

LOT NUMBER 

XC015438B 

05-Aug·2005 

06-Aug-2002 

2000 psig 

02004382 

514840 

ANALYTICAL INFORMATION 

•· : ~. , I 

;s calib&a.tion standard has been certified· per the 1997 EPA Traceability Protocol, Document EPA-600/97/121, Using Procedure G1. All Values certified 

Je +/·1% NIST Traceable. 

;~§)~r®~ &1-~~:o*-ia~ 

~Jrr:ag>~a:r~. 

Type 

SRM 1678C 

instrument/Make/Model 

Siemens/Uitramat 5E 

0 age: 1 Of 1 

LOTIO 

Do Not Use This Cylinder below 150 psig. i.e. 1.0 Megapascal 

Anai yt i c a"J: ·R.·~ s~l t:f?; 

· . :~eq4ested Mixture ·~et.tlfied .. · , . ··concen.tr.ati·oJ1 

-··~";"'.'.,•, • • "' 'I i_S5o.oo :p~m 

':.:BALANCE G4~: 

:Analyticai 

:~ncertaintr 

CALIBRATION STANDARDS USED IN ASSAY 

Cylinder No Concentration 

XF0005248 48.76 +/- 0.31 ppm CARBON MONOXIDE 

ANALYTICAL INSTRUMENTS USED IN ASSAY 

Analytical Principle 

NonDispersive Infrared 

Last Multipoint 

Calibration 

07/25/02 

~~ssay _Dates 

......................... ~.. . ..... J. 

Expiration 

04/11/07 

QAApprovad ~- i;~~ ... ~ 

"\: ~ .. <\' \f,!l 
BOC GASES 

AW'IBOC GASES 1075 CINCLARE DRIVE 

PORT ALLEN,LA 70767 

(225) 388 0900 

~-

CUSTOMER 

Madison Gas&Gear 

191 COCHRAN ROAD 

HUNTSVJL:LE, AL 358240000 

CUSTOMER 6'0 NO: 

Previous Certification Date(s): 

. ·;CER:Tl'FICATE ·OF ~L¥·S·I.S 

· ·: ~- .. ~:PA ~;-otoco-IL. $as 

CYLINDER NO CC9658 

EXPIRATION DATE OS.Aug.-2005 

'CERTIFICATION DATE 06-Aug-2002 

CYLINDER PRESSURE 2000 pslg 

PRODUCT 10 NO 24007729 

LOT NUMBER 514196 

ANALYTICAL INFORMATION 

is calibration standard has been certified per the 1997 EPA Traceability Protocol, Document EPA-600/97/121, Using Procedure G1. All Values certified 

be +/-1% NIST Traceable. 

;io\RS®t~:~NOXI~.~~ 

'J~TRe:G£:N 

Type 

SRM 16808 

I nstrumenUMake/Model 

Siemens/Uitramat SE 

LOTIO 

2-H-102 

Do Not Use This Cylinder below 150 psig. i.e. 1.0 Megapascal 

.~giyticai :Results ~e·que~ed~ix'iure ' cer;tlfled 

.. · Con~centrafioh 

500.00 p_pm ·499.4-ppm I 'lj 

·BALANQE' .GAS 

AnaJyfi~l 

UnceJ#inty 

+/-1 .00% NI·$T Traceable 

CALIBRATION STANDARDS USED IN ASSAY 

Cylinder No Concentration 

CLM009420 490.40 +/- 2.90 ppm CARBON MONOXIDE 

AN~~YTICAL INSTRUMENTS USED IN ASSAY 

Analytical Principle 

NonDispersive Infrared 

Last Multipoint 

Calibration 

07/25/02 

.:"- .:.:1;-'t:ilu:- '.Ji Tl1c BOC :>r:)l.lp fnc 

Page: 1 Of 1 ~ i Jr."~:!\' ~\.'i'l" (·''r"fn·,r:--~~~\"Jr: QAApproved 

~say Oates· 

. -- .. :p]./30/02 & 08tb6102 

./ 

Expiration 

04/07/07 

. ;¢ .. 
:&PA Mli.thocl 5 

iQJ. ti: c:-sooo ~ata: ---~----~----------------> 

·i.ll.l. f: 13?6 BD~gt:ic Proasura: ----------> 

'1'hooz:D.ti.Cill c=.i tical Vacu~:: ---> 

1!1111 

! ' ! !! ! 

---------------- OR! CAS ~TER ~ADINGS ----------------

Volume Volume VolUmCI Fin;a.l T10111p.rz. 

:l.H Ti:na IzU.tial li'.inal ~otal 

C.:i.n H201 tnin) (cu !'tl Ccu !'tl {dag F) (dug Fl ldag F) Idea; F) 

o.sl. l5.00 342.111 348.461 6.350 85 .o B.S.O B.S. 0 as.o 

l.OB 10.00 348.461 354.063 s. 602 B4. 0 B4 .0 8.4.0 84.0 

1.8.5 . 10.00 354.063 361.263 '7.200 84.0 84.0 86.0 94.0 

3.60 5 .DO :361.263 366.203 86.0 84.0 BS.O 84.0 

.s.ss .s.oo 366.20.3 372..253 s.oso BG.Q 84 .o 510.0 84.0 

9/3/0'3 

!!!i'.PP (in, RgJ 

14 .1.5 f:i.n, iig) 

Orl.:!icg 

Sariall Cocff'iciant Vnc:uum Initial !'.il'lal Avar11.90 

lnumbe::.ol (Julio above) (.i:n Hg) laag i') (dog FJ (c::img F) 

llG4B 0.331 :!3.0 82.0 B2.0 82.0 

C0!5 0.438 2l . .S 82.0 82.,0 82..0 

DGG'3 0.562 20.0 62.0 82.0 82.0 

Dc:;73 0. 790 12.0 82.0 B2.0 82..0 

O.!i'.S$1 la.o 82.0 62.0 82.0 

--- OR! ::AS HE'ZER --- --------- ORIFICE --------- -- DRY GAS HESB -- --------- ORI<ICt ---------

VOLUMi: VOI»Mi: 

Vmt.G~d) 

:cu ::'tl (litl2=5) 

e; .173 l'l~.a 

s .~62 15.4. i 

7 .o:n l9ll.O 

.4.!:33 136.9 

.5. 942 lG!l.3 

VOLUME: VOL~ 

CORR CORR 

V::llltci) VC!"(.!I':Q} 

(CU !tJ 

6.396 

s .6~i 

?.2~0 

.s. 021 

6.l7.9 

lBl.l 

159.6 

20.5.0 

l42.2 

l7S.O 

VOLUMi: 

V:r 

(C:\l :!tl 

£ • .SS! 

S.iiS 

7.417 

.S.l44 

6.331 

Ava:-aga Y -------> 

y 

'-'nl~:e ila:::iation 

(nwnl:la:-) lnu:nba:::) 

l. 0.36 0. OO:i 

1.032 -0.00.3 

1. 030 -o. oo.s 

1.039 0.003 

1.040 o.oos 

1.0:3.5 

a:capta!:le -::olo=&nce o: indi v.i.cu11.l Vl1l UDa ~rem :;hg avg::UqQ ill •-0. 02. 

dH@ 

Vnlucr Va.lue ·~r.:.n:.ioh 

(in H20) cmm K20) (:..n <1201 

1.833 H.SS -0.080 

l. esc 47.24 -0.053 

l.li32 49.06 0.018 

1.95.'3 .cl9,6·l li.O~O 

l.9BB .50.51 0.075 

l.Sl3 

::'::r O:ri!ica Culibra.tion i'actor cilfll, -:ha ori!'ica cU.::'!GrllntJ.al prcassu::.oGI i.r. ir.:::has of li20 O:.lul.t equntas to 0. 75 cfm o!' aJ.:r 

if (·'! \ (? a:GN.C:l:l·--~--J-+'--=L...4==~:;:;::..:=·..::.=oa. """~F~4:4i:c::~=· :;;... ........ ________ _ q_ ?-,r)::? Dllt£ : __ .. __ ... _. __ .... _~;:: .... :;;;.; _____ _ 
~Co~ ': 20:0 

lo=ial tl: 80707 

I II I! I II 

~'rANT 

CMPOR':ANT 

. I' II' II' 

APJ:X INS'rRDMZN'l'S 

Ei'A Mothcd S 

522 Sarioo Motar Box Ca.li.l:lru.tion 

Pre-Teat or~fica Mothcd 

English Motor Bcx Unita, Engliah K' FQctor 

FileNUIIQ: C:\My DcCWIIcnto\(Blua M. Bcx CAl.xlu)5220RPRS 

Ra~sod: 7/25/95 Varoion: 2.2 

Data: -------------------------> 

Barcmotric Proaaura: ----------> Thaoratic~ Criticul Vacuum:---> 

8/3/03 

30.07 (in. Bgo) 

14.lS (in. Rg) 

For VZLl.icl toat ruulto, tho Actual Vacuum ohould bo 1 to 2 in. Bg groatar than tho Theoretical Cdtical V~acuum ohown a.bova. 

Tho C=itiCll.l. Orit'ioo Coot'fic.i.cnt, K', muat bo ontarecl in Enqliah unita, (t't) ""3• (dog R) "0.5/ ( (in.Rq) •tmin) I. 

---------------- DRY GAS METER READINGS ---------------- -CRITICAL ORIFICE READINGSdH 

!l.n H20) 

0.70 

1.30 

2.14 

4.12 

6.10 

Timo 

Cr:ainl 

15.00 

lO.OO 

10.00 

s.oc 

s.oc 

Volume Voluma 

!ni Ulll Fl.nlll 

(cu ft) leu t't) 

Vcluma 

'l'o~ 

(CU ft) 

6.506 

5.799 

7.471 

5.164 

6.342 

lni tial 'l'OJIIPII. Final Tampo • 

Inlot OUtlGt lnlcat OUtllllt 

(ciog F) (clog' F'l (dog F) (dog F) 

0:-i!ica 

Sorillll 

·(:~umber! 

K' Ori.riao Actual -- Ambicant Tampar~~otul:'e --

Coefficient Vacuum lru.t:l.al Fi.nlll Avaraqo 

Caec abavo) lin Hgo) ldag rJ (cia; F) (do!J Fl 

-·- DRY ~ MU'ER ---

VOLUME 

CORRECT:&L 

Vm(Dtd) 

(C\J !t) 

6.328 

5. 634 

7.2.511 

5. 028 

6. 106 

VOLVMZ 

CO!UU:C'l'J:D 

VmiGtd) 

(l:.tlii:'S) 

179.2 

159.5 

205.6 

142.4 

l75.2 

895.307 901.813 

901. B13 907.612 

907. 612 915. OB3 

9l.S.083 920.247 

5120.247 926.589 

86.0 

aa.o 

09.0 

91.0 

93.0 

--------- ORIFICE ---------

VOLUMe 

COR.R 

Vcr(utd) 

(:U ft) 

6.378 

5.616 

'1.209 

4.998 

6.145 

VOLUME 

COR.R 

Vcr(stc!) 

Clite:s) 

180.6 

159.0 

204.2 

141.5 

174.0 

VOLUME 

NOMINAL 

Vc: 

(CU ft} 

6.589 

~.013 

1.468 

S.lB2 

6.383 

85.0 

86.0 

87.0 

08.0 

851.0 

a8.o 

SJO.D 

91.0 

93.0 

96.0 

06.0 

87.0 

se.o 

89.0 

89.0 

-- DRY GAS MI:TER --

CALIBRATION FACTOR 

y 

ValuD '/ariation 

(numb&r) (numDDr) 

l. 008 0.011 

0. 997 0.000 

o. 9.93 -o. oo4 

0.994 -0.003 

0.993 -C.004 

DG48 

DGS!I 

DG63 

DG73 

DGB1 

0.331 

0.430 

0.562 

0.700 

0.959 

22.0 

20.4 

18.3 

lS .1 

13.0 

08.0 

89.0 

89.0 

90.0 

91.0 

--------- ORIFICE ---------

CAL:IBRA~ION FAC'lOR 

dHt 

Vlllue 

{in H20l 

2..119 

2..251 

2.245 

2.244 

2..1!16 

Value 1R::a.ation 

(IIIII H20} (in H20) 

53.82 -0.0512 

57.18 0.040 

5'1.02 0,034 

56.99 0.033 

ss. 77 -o. o1s 

BB.O 

89.0 

90.0 

90.0 

91.0 

BB.O 

BSil.O 

Blil.S 

90.0 

91. c 

Ave--uga Y -------> 0.997 2.211 56.16 <------- Average dHS 

;:a: For C&librat:a.on Fa::or Y, tha rlltio o~ the reaCing of tho calibrn~ion meter to tho d--y !Jns moto:-, 

accopcDblo ~olaranca o! 1ndiviau~l vu1uaa ~rem tho avgrago iu •-0.02. 

For Or~!1co Calibration Faoto:- dHQ, tho ori~ice di!!arlilntial prDoaura in inchos o! 820 that oqu~toa to 0.75 cfm o! lllr 

a~ sa F and 29.512 a tolQr&nca of :a.neiv~du11.! valuas from tho avorago :a.& •-0.2. 

Dn-::e:_1~( _3-+-/ 0_-,_:::> __ _ 
Sample Probe Calibration 

Inspected By: 

Inspection Date: 

S. C,,tin~hd¥"1 

Probe ID: 

Pitot Tube Openings Damaged? Yes I No I \/ 

Pitot Tube AligJUI).~nt OK? Yes I ../ No! 

Calibration Required? Yes I No I .I 

External Tube Diameter (Dt)* Dt= 0.375 

*Dt must be between 3/16 abd 3/8 

""""' Base-to-plane opening distances (Pa and Pb )* Pa= 0.4375 

*Pa = Pb Pb= 0.4375 

Pa!Dt = 1.17 

(Must be between 1.05 and 1.5) 

If pi tot does not meet the criteria specified above it must be repaired or calibrated in 

accordance with Sections 4.1.2 through 4.15 ofMethod 2. 

Base1in~ coefficient' of 0.84 applied to pitots that meet inspection criteria 

Target Reference Indicated Temp. 

Temp. Temp. Temp_. Difference 

lce-32F 

Ambient-70F ~L Lf6 

Hot Oil-150F 

Boiling H20-212F 

Hot Oil-150F 

L " ( ,o "" • Hoo•H o•v "' ........ , ...................... ) 

Corrunents: 

Ofo 

Difference . Specification 

% Difference < 1.5 

e.. ROBI!RTS 

Aile~& 

Assoc·nates 
Date: 

Calibrated By: 

Notes: 

Nozzle Calibration 

a: Three different nozzle diameters, each diameter must be within 0.001" 

b: DiffD =maximum difference between any two diameters 0.004 " 

c: D avg =average of01, 02, and 03 

!:.ROBERTS 

Alley& 

Associates 111CORPORATtD 
Sample Probe Calibration 

Inspected By: 

Inspection Date: 

Probe ID: 

Pitot Tube Openin-gs Damaged? 

Pitot Tube Aligiun~nt OK? . 

Calibration Required? 

External Tube Diameter (Dt)* 

*Dt must be between 3/16 abd 3/8 

Base-to-plane opening distances (Pa and Pb )* 

*Pa = Pb 

Yes I 

Yes I 

Yes I 

No! K" 1111 

,:>< No I 

No I ?<' 

Dt= 0.375 

Pa= 0.4375 

Pb= 0.4375 

Pa/Dt = 1.17 

(Must be between 1.05 and 1.5) 

lfpitot does not meet the criteria specified above it must be repaired or calibrated in 

accordance with Sections 4.1.2 through 4.15 of Method 2. 

Baseline coefficient of0.84 applied to pitots that meet inspection criteria 

Target Reference Indicated Temp. 

Temp. Temll_. Temp. Difference 

Ice-32F 

Ambient-70F '-l~c, tf 3 Cl 0 

Hot Oil-150F 

Boiling H20-212F 

Hot Oil-150F I 

r· 

Comments: 

o/o. 

Difference Specification 

0 % Difference < 1.5 

, •,•o"'' ... ,,. .. , ... ,. , v•· • • , ...... :1 

E. ROBERTS 

Alley& 

Associates 111CORPORAT!D 
Date: 

Calibrated By: 

.~ 

Notes: 

Nozzle Calibration 

G I I~ ( v. I~~ o. I 'rl 

a: Three different nozzle diameters, each diameter must be within 0.001 11 

b: DiffD;: ma."<imum difference between any two diameters 0·.004" 

,.. D avg = average of D I, 02, and 03 

!. ROBI!.RT5 

Alley& 

Associates 11'tCORPORI'71!.0 
Inspected By: 

Sample Probe Calibration 

5. Cut'\J'llrfi han 

Inspection Date: J)·t:J. o3 

Probe ID: 

Pitot Tube Openings Damaged? :Yes I No! \7 .. 

Pitot Tube Ali~~nt OK? Yes I ./ No I 

Calibration Required? Yes I No I {/" 

External Tube Diameter (Dt)* Dt= 0.375 

*Dt must be between 3/16 abd 3/8 

...... ~ase-to-plane opening distances (Pa and Pb )* Pa= 0.4375 

*Pa = Pb .Pb= 0.4375 

Pa/Dt = 1.17 

(Must be between 1.05 and 1.5) 

If pi tot does not meet the criteria specified above it must be repaired or calibrated in 

accordance with Sections 4.1.2 through 4.15 of Method 2. 

Baseline coefficient of 0.84 applied to pitots that meet inspection criteria. 

Target Reference Indicated. Temp. o/o 

Temp. Temp. Temp. Difference Difference Specification 

lce-32F 

Ambient-?OF .3;:;J ~~ %Difference< 1.5 

Hot Oil-ISOF 

Boiling H20-212F 

Hot Oi1-150F 

. . -->··-·~-· ....... .. . ... ·----~ ...... , .. ,. .......... ,xx·-· ...... .__ .......... . 

.,., ............... ···-~· ..... ' ........... ' ..... , ..... , . ., ........ ·•··.·" ..... · .. '.:1 

. ,._. ..... .... ... .. ..... ' . .. .... ...~. ·~ ,, ...... ' ....... ,:~ :.·, . 

Comments: 

E.ROBI!l!TS 

AJllle~&. 

Assoc'iates I N C: 0 R P 0 R 1\ T e .D 
Date: 

Calibrated By: 

Notes: 

Nozzle Calibration 

. •.· .. -~ 

{). 00'3 

....... 

I 

a: Three different nozzle diameters, each diameter must be within 0.001" 

b: DiffD =maximum difference between any two diameters 0.004 '' 

,.. 0 avg = average of D I, 02, and 03 

~ RODI!RTS 

Alley& 

Associates II'IC:ORPORA'!'I!D 
& . 

E . ROBERTS 

Alley& 

As·sociates 

INC OR PORATED 

&& && ... E&S& 2 &&&& 

APPENDIXE 

PROCESS OPERA TINGIPRODUCTION DATA 
Monarch Ceramic Tile 

Process Data 

12/11/03 

Source Rate 

Press 1 Dryer 7.07 tons/hour 
Monarch Ceramic Tile 

Process Data 

12/12/03 

Source 

Kiln 1 

Rate 

5.65 tons/hour 

\