**Case No.** **04-14-00483-CV**

### ROWLAND**J. MARTIN** **TEXAS COURT** **OF APPEALS** **Appellant**

## "•:'■**v. FOKTHE** **FOURTH DISTRICT^** **~-**

## :.**t>3 EDWARD** **BRAVENEC AND** **1216**

## WEST**AVE. INC.** **C"O Appellees** **BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS** **=J APPELLANT'S** **NOTICE OF** **WITHDRAWAL OF** **MOTION FILED** **ON APRIL** **23. 20l5g.** **Noiice is** **hereby given** **that Appellant** **withdraws the** **motion for** **relief filed** **on April** **23.20)5. Consistent** **with the** **purpose oflhe** **motion, docket** **records reflect** **the filing** **of the** **intended amended** **reply brief** **on April** **7, 2015** **within the** **filing period** **authorized by** **order of** **the Court** **on April** **6, 2015.** **No formal** **action by** **the Court** **is required** **at this** **juncture to** **effectuate the** **Texas Supreme** **Court's policy** **to discourages** **affirmance of** **judgment in** **any case** **solely because** **of briefing** **deficiencies. Inpetco,** **Inc. v.** **Texas Am.** **Bank, 729** **S.W.2d 300,** **300 (Tex.1987)** **(per curiam).** **Appellant has** **clarified the** **format of the** **citations to** **the record** **that appear** **in the** **intended**

### Amended**Reply Brief.** **Consistent with** **Tex. R. Civ.** **P. 7,** **the 150°'** **District Court** **on April** **30. 2015** **resolved the** **question of** **whether Appellant's** **pro se** **appearance issue** **in Case** **No. 2015-CI-04779** **was proper** **by denying** **the frivolous** **motion to** **disqualify that** **the Bexar** **County Tax** **Authorities filed** **in thai** **Court through** **private counsel.** **In the** **interest of** **judicial economy.** **Appellant respectfully** **defers to** **the Court's** **sound discretion** **to manage** **access to** **the judicial** **process in** **accordance with** **the rule** **of law.** **Ex parts** **Shaffer, 649** **S.W. 2d** **300 (Tex.** **1983) (ruling** **reversing order** **of contempt in** **independent executor** **case that** **"ordering a party** **to be** **represented by** **an attorney** **abridges that** **person's right** **to be** **heard by** 

### himself).**See. Order** **oflhe IStf** **District Cowl** **in Case** **No. 201S-CI-04779** **dated April** **3d 2015.** **Dated: April** **23, 2015** **Respectfully Submitted,** **owland J.** **Martin 951** **Lombrano San** **Antonio, Tx** **78207 (210)323-3849** **CERTIFICATE OF** **SERVICE mailed** **copy of** **Appellant's "Notice** **of Withdrawal Of** **Motion," on** **April 30, 2015,** **to Attorney** **Glenn Deadman.** **at 509** **S. Main,** **San Antonio** **Texas. Rowland** **J. Martin** 

### CASE**NUMBER 2015-CI-04779** 

### ADMINISTRATOR**FOR THE ESTATE** **IN THE** **DISTRICT COURT** **OF KING,** **Petitioner VS.** 

## 150"1**JUDICIAL DISTRICT** **BEXAR COUNTY,** **CITY OF** **SAN ANTONIO** **AND SAN** **ANTONIO**

### INDEPENDENT**SCHOOL DISTRICT** 

### Respondents**BEXAR COUNTY,** **TEXAS**

## ORDER**DENYING RESPONDENTS'** **MOTION TO** **DISQUALIFYING ROWLAND** **J. MARTIN,** **JR.. TO** **APPEAR PRO** **SE FOR** **THE ESTATE** **OF JOHNNIE** **MAE KING** 

## Be**it remembered** **that on** **the £0** **day of** **April, 2015** **came on** **to be** **heard Respondent's** **Motion io** **Disqualify Rowland** **J, Martin,** **Jr., To** **Appear Pro** **Se for** **the Estate** **of**

## Johnnie**Mae King. After** **considering the** **Motion and** **pleadings on** **file, as** **well as** **all of** **the evidence** **and arguments** **of counsel** **for Respondents** **and Petitioner,** **the Court** **finds that** **said Motion** **should be** **denied.**

## IT**IS THEREFORE** **ORDERED that** **Respondents' Motion** **to Disqualify** **Rowland J.** **Martin, Jr.,** **To Appear** **Pro Se** **for the** **Estate of** **Johnnie Mae** **King. Is** **hereby, in** **all things,** **denied.**

## SIGNED**AND ENTERED** **this****2*> day****of April,** **2015. JUDGE** **PRESIDING**