alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**OFFICE OF**  **THE ATTORNEY**  **GENERAL OF**  **TEXAS AUSTIN** 

'r;onorable Ciao. Ii. Sheppard Coz.ptroiler of ;‘ubllc AOOOlUlts Austin, Texan Sir;

, aA 8ttEQmey, x08 in the ma Dollar* (#lmzwJc) 6QAal property Qn

1988, all

ale 7SS5, Beriaod,Citil Statutea,rabasprovision ror the cororisafonerr * Court of any county after thirtyday6 netiae to the aouatyor diattiotattoollri~ t0~ file **delinquent** t8x suits **snd** him failure to **do** 110, to a~- ploy anotherattarae~for the parposeof oolloat~ dolinqUOAt State and **OaWtty** tax06 **$Or** a QOXQOAt6SOtheWOOf~

Axtlole TSSSa, **Revlned** civil Statuten,provides that aald oontraotl~ met be approvedby both the OasrptXQilerBOA. -0. Ii. Sheppard. April 26, 1939, S-age 2

and the kttorney Caneral of the Xate of Texas, both as to substanoe and to form and further provides thet any oontraot made in violation of such aot shall be void.

**As** said by the Supreme Court in the case of Xhite v. bloCill, 114 9. 7:. (2d) 860, a contraot for the collection of taxes on personal projxrty must rind the support in some article of the statute to be valid. And, as held in that ease, and sasterwood v. ifenderson County, 62 S. ';:.

**(Cd)** C5, as well as Zplvan Sanders Cor,pany v. Sourxy County, 77 2. PI'.(2d) 709, oontraots for the ool1OOtiOA Or deliAqUOAt tax08 made betWWA OOmAias~OA~l'a' oourta And attorneys must be approved by the Comptroller and the Attorney General,otherwisetheyare void. Then, **ia no**  provlalo~ **in the**  **atatuto** r0r **the comptroller**  **to ratify**  auoh oontraoteartier they have been perf.onaed~ A8 said **by** the Supreme Court iA Eaatemood V. EIeAdOrMA county,mppn:

*The pomr to provideior the 

### oolleotlon oi delinqt&ent

&a and preaaribethe oompena&ion to'be paid for the 6enlo66 **rendered** 5.~ that respect reeldeseroluslvelyin the leglalature.* SlnoeArtlolea 7935 6nd 7W5-a embody the only prwlaioa6 r0r a oolleotlng

### attorney to 

### x-weirs

a 

### parto? the rbare oolleeoted for the State aa oompensatloafor &la senloes, he'muat brm hlmaelfulthln the terms of those statoteeto be entit&d to be uompearrated by the State. Then 1s no **statute** whioh dlreotlyor indlreotlyolother the Comptroller

with 

### l thorlty to oompensate‘am attorney ?or renlaw renderedby hla la 

### oolleoting taxes.
our aA6wer to your que6tlon,therefoxe,

### 18 in the negative. Your6 very truly 

### ATTQRlQY

t2WERAL

### OF TEXAS

Glenn R. Lowi Aeolatant GRL:LM
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration 

          - [TA-W-61,261] 

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on April 9, 2007 in response to a petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers of Missbrenner Prints, Inc., Clifton, New Jersey. 

The petitioning group of workers is covered by an earlier petition (TA-W-60,945) filed on February 12, 2007, that is the subject of an ongoing investigation for which a determination has not yet been issued. 

Further investigation in this case would serve no purpose. Therefore, the investigation under this petition has been terminated. 

Signed at Washington, DC, this 12th day of April, 2007. 

Linda G. Poole, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

 [FR Doc. E7-7622 Filed 4-20-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-11145

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JARVIS DAWKINS,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:09-CR-145-3

Before KING, DENNIS, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jarvis Dawkins has 

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th 

Cir. 2011). Dawkins has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief 

and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with 

counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 31, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 15-11145 Document: 00513659002 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/31/2016
No. 15-11145

2

appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is 

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the 

appeal is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 15-11145 Document: 00513659002 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/31/2016
BERKADIA®

 

 

Annual Statement as to Compliance

For the Year Ended December 31, 2023 (the “ReportingPeriod”)

 

*Morgan Stanley Capital, I Trust,*

*Series 2016-UBS9*

 

Pursuant to Section 3.06 (f)of the Subservicing Agreement governing the referenced transaction (the“Servicing Agreement”), I hereby attest that:

 

         i.           A review of the activities and performanceof Berkadia as Subservicer during the (reporting period) period, has been madeunder my supervision.

 

       ii.           To the best of my knowledge, based on suchreview, Berkadia as Subservicer has fulfilled, in all material respects, itsobligations under this Subservicing Agreement throughout the period and nodefault by the Subservicer under the Subservicing Agreement has occurred and iscontinuing.

 

Berkadia,

 

/s/ Mark E. McCool

Mark E. McCool 

President 

February 10, 2024
No. 53189.

#### Philip Blum & Co., Inc., et al. v. United States,

protests 106930-K/91430, etc. (Chicago).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

For the reasons stated in *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C. D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained. The protests were overruled in all other respects.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED NOVEMBER 19, 2020

NO. 03-19-00311-CR

Daniel Heredia, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 207TH DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES GOODWIN, TRIANA, AND SMITH

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE TRIANA

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction rendered by the trial court. Having reviewed 

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the 

trial court’s judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment. Because 

appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
No. 49321.

#### Protest 105797-K of M. Pressner & Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

The uncontradicted evidence disclosed that the tape measures in question are similar to those the subject of Abstract 43372, which record was incorporated herein. In accordance therewith the claim at 40 percent under paragraph 339 was sustained.
# Official Journal C 173/27 M

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 173 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5827 May 2015 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 173

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5827 May 2015

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Preparatory acts |
| | COUNCIL |
| 2015/C 173/01 | Position (EU) No 8/2015 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on information accompanying transfers of funds and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1781/2006Adopted by the Council on 20 April 2015 (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| 2015/C 173/02 | Statement of the Council’s reasons: Position (EU) No 8/2015 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on information accompanying transfers of funds and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1781/2006 | 20 |

Notice No

Contents

page

III   Preparatory acts

COUNCIL

2015/C 173/01

Position (EU) No 8/2015 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on information accompanying transfers of funds and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1781/2006Adopted by the Council on 20 April 2015 (
  1
  )

1

1

2015/C 173/02

Statement of the Council’s reasons: Position (EU) No 8/2015 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on information accompanying transfers of funds and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1781/2006

20

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
# C_2018022EN.01000201.xml

| 22.1.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 22/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.1.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 22/2

---

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 23 November 2017 — Servizi assicurativi del commercio estero SpA (SACE), Sace BT SpA v European Commission, Italian Republic

(Case C-472/15 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - State aid - Export credit insurance - Reinsurance cover provided by a public undertaking to its subsidiary - Capital contributions to cover the subsidiary’s losses - Notion of State aid - Imputability to the State - Private investor test))

(2018/C 022/02)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Appellants: Servizi assicurativi del commercio estero SpA (SACE), Sace BT SpA (represented by: M. Siragusa and G. Rizza, avvocati)

Appellants:

Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: L. Flynn, G. Conte and D. Grespan, acting as Agents) Italian Republic (represented by: G. Palmieri, acting as Agent, and S. Fiorentino, avvocato dello Stato)

Other parties to the proceedings:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders Servizi assicurativi del commercio estero SpA (SACE) and Sace BT SpA to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission in the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Servizi assicurativi del commercio estero SpA (SACE) and Sace BT SpA to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission in the appeal;

| 3. | Orders the Italian Republic to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Italian Republic to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 381, 16.11.2015.

1

---
```

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly  Report of NYFIX,  Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q/A for the period  ending  March 31, 2003 as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Mark R. Hahn,  Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, to
the best of my knowledge, that:

    (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section  13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Mark R. Hahn
-------------------------------------
Mark R. Hahn
Chief Financial Officer
May 28, 2004

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to NYFIX, Inc. and will be retained by NYFIX, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This  certification  accompanies  this  Report  pursuant  to Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and  shall not be deemed  filed by the  Company  for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
```
```

[113th Congress Public Law 58]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

[[Page 127 STAT. 657]]

Public Law 113-58
113th Congress

                                 An Act

 
  To designate the United States courthouse located at 101 East Pecan 
      Street in Sherman, Texas, as the ``Paul Brown United States 
          Courthouse''. <<NOTE: Dec. 20, 2013 -  [H.R. 185]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The United States courthouse located at 101 East Pecan Street in 
Sherman, Texas, shall be known and designated as the ``Paul Brown United 
States Courthouse''.
SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the United States courthouse referred to 
in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Paul Brown 
United States Courthouse''.

    Approved December 20, 2013.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 185:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 113-232 (Comm. on Transportation and Infrastructure).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 159 (2013):
            Oct. 22, considered and passed House.
            Dec. 17, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
In the Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided: April 22, 2014

S14A0217. ALLEN v. CLARKE.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the court below is affirmed without opinion pursuant to

Supreme Court Rule 59.

Affirmed without opinion. All the Justices concur.
121 STAT. 1358 PUBLIC LAW 110–130—NOV. 30, 2007 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 3530: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 153 (2007): 

Oct. 9, considered and passed House. 

Nov. 16, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 110–130 

110th Congress 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 1400 Highway 

41 North in Inverness, Florida, as the ‘‘Chief Warrant Officer Aaron Weaver 

Post Office Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. CHIEF WARRANT OFFICER AARON WEAVER POST OFFICE 

BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 1400 Highway 41 North in Inverness, Florida, 

shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Chief Warrant Officer Aaron 

Weaver Post Office Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Chief Warrant Officer Aaron Weaver Post Office Building’’. 

Approved November 30, 2007. 

Nov. 30, 2007 

[H.R. 3530] 


dkrause on GSDDPC29 with PUBLIC LAWS
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                             TRANS-INDUSTRIES, INC.

                        CERTIFICATION OF CEO PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Trans-Industries, Inc.
(the "Company") for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Dale S.
Coenen, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes--Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


/s/ Dale S. Coenen
---------------------------
Name: Dale S. Coenen
Title: Chief Executive Officer
Date: November 12, 2004


This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes--Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Paragraph 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 10**  **- 6970** 

LARRY HAMILTON, JR. , Plaintiff

– Appellant ,
v. WASHINGTON COUNTY DETENTION CENTER; VAN EVANS, Major; CICCARELLI, Dr.; DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; O. WAYNE HILL, War den; CARROLL PARRISH, Asst. Warden; O. WILLIAMS, R.N.; DIVISION OF CORRECTIONS; PRIME MEDICAL CARE , Defendants

- Appellees
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Greenbelt
. Roger W. Titus , District Judge. ( 8:09

- cv - 00516

- RWT ; 8:09

- cv - 00722

- RWT )

Submitted : October 22, 2010 Decided: November 12, 2010

Before SHEDD, AGEE, and DAVIS , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
. Larry Hamilton, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Rodger Owen Roberts on, LAW OFFICE OF JOSEPH M. JAGIELSKI, Baltimore, Maryland; David J. McManus, Jr., BAXTER, BAKER, SIDLE, CONN & JONES, PA, Baltimore, Maryland; Glenn William Bell, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublishe d opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Larry Hamilton, Jr., appeals the district court ’ s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (200 6 ) complaint. Appellee Evans has moved to dismiss, arguing Hamilton’s notice of appeal w as untimely. We deny Evans’s motion
. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order
. Hamilton v. Washington Cty. Det. Ctr. , No s . 8:09

- cv - 00516

- RWT ; 8:09

- cv - 00722

- RWT (D. Md. May 26, 2010) . W e dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
NATIONAL SEISMIC HAZARD MAP

COMPARISON WITH

OPEN FILE REPORT 2007-1175

Plate 3

Version 1.0

20-30%g

SEATTLE CITY LIMITS

SEATTLE CITY LIMITS

P

U

G

E

T

S O U N D

P

U

G

E

T

S

O

U

N D

20-30%g

20-30%g

20-30%g

122°15'

122°15'

122°20'

122°20'

122°25'

122°25'

47°40'

47°40'

47°35'

47°35'

47°30'

47°30'

1 Hz Spectral Acceleration

with 10% Probability of

Exceedance in 50 Years

%g

FOR USE IN COMPARISON OF 2002 NATIONAL SEISMIC HAZARD MAP WITH

SEISMIC HAZARD MAP OF SEATTLE, WASHINGTON

1 HZ SPECTRAL ACCELERATION WITH 10% PROBABILITY OF EXCEEDANCE IN 50 YEARS

By

Arthur D. Frankel and Susan Rhea

2007

Any use of trade, firm or product names in this publication is for descriptive

purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.

Digital files available at http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2007/XXXX

Projection Washington State Plane North; FIPS Zone 4601; NAD 83

Base maps from National Geographic TOPO! 2001

Originally from USGS 24,000 Topographic Basemaps:

Shilshole Bay, Seattle North, Kirkland,

Duwamish Head, Seattle South, Mercer Island,

Vashon, Des Moines, and Renton

last known revision for all basemaps 1992

SCALE 1:25 000

0 0.5 1 2 3 MILE

0 0.5 1 2 3 KILOMETER

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR

U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

145

110

80

60

50

40

30

20
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 506 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 506

 To designate the period beginning on June 5, 2006, and ending on June 
                8, 2006, as ``National Health IT Week''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 8, 2006

Ms. Stabenow (for herself, Ms. Snowe, Mrs. Murray, and Mr. Lautenberg) 
 submitted the following resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 To designate the period beginning on June 5, 2006, and ending on June 
                8, 2006, as ``National Health IT Week''.

Whereas the Center for Information Technology Leadership estimated that the 
        implementation of national standards for interoperability and the 
        exchange of health information would save the United States 
        approximately $77,000,000,000 in expenses relating to healthcare each 
        year;
Whereas the RAND Corporation estimated that, if the healthcare system of the 
        United States implemented the use of computerized medical records, the 
        system could save the United States more than $81,000,000,000 each year;
Whereas healthcare information technology has been shown to improve the quality 
        and safety of the delivery of healthcare in the United States;
Whereas healthcare information technology and management systems have been 
        recognized as essential tools for improving the quality and cost 
        efficiency of the healthcare system;
Whereas the President and Secretary of Health and Human Services have made a 
        commitment to leveraging the benefits of the healthcare information 
        technology and management systems by establishing the Office of the 
        National Coordinator for Health Information Technology and the American 
        Health Information Community;
Whereas Congress has placed an emphasis on improving the quality and safety of 
        the delivery of healthcare in the United States; and
Whereas 42 organizations have come together to support National Healthcare IT 
        Week to improve public awareness relating to the potential benefits of 
        improved quality and cost efficiency that the healthcare system could 
        achieve by implementing health information technology: Now, therefore, 
        be it
    Resolved, That the Senate designates the period beginning on June 
5, 2006, and ending on June 8, 2006, as ``National Health IT Week''.
                                 <all>
```