alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
D istrict Judge of the Easter n District of Texas, sitting by

designation. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_______________________ No. 94-40728

_______________________
VIRGINIA HIGHTOWER, ET AL., Plaintiffs-Appellees.

versus TEXAS HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION, ET AL., Defendants, MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION OF PALESTINE, INC., dba MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, ANDERSON COUNTY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL RETIREMENT PLAN, AKA THE TEXAS ASSOCIATION RETIREMENT PLAN FOR MEMBER HOSPITALS - ANDERSON COUNTY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, Defendant-Appellant,

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas

_________________________________________________________________ January 3, 1996
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING (Opinion September 28, 1995, 5th Circuit, 1995, ___F.3d___) Before DAVIS and JONES, Circuit Judges and COBB 1 , District Judge
O R D E R :

In their petition for rehearing, appellees have raised a number of arguments that they did not make to this court in their original appellate briefs. Specifically, they contend that if the

sco pe of Title I and Title IV of ERISA are not construedconsistently with regard to governmental plans that have, as here,

been transferred to private entities, a number of problems will arise. The alleged problems will include the extent to which state law rules will govern matters otherwise controlled by federal law under ERISA's preemptive provisions in Title I; whether the Title I protections accorded the PBGC will continue to apply to 0court,
and they are deemed waived and have played no role in our decision.

For this reason, and because appellees' reurging of their position on rehearing is otherwise not persuasive, the petition is
DENIED
. Judge Cobb would grant the petition for a panel rehearing.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

 EASTERN DIVISION

United States of America 

-vsThomas Eugene Williams, Jr. 

aka Thomas J. Williams 

________________________________ 

Case No. 2:13-cr-091 (1) 

 

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 

 CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY 

The Defendant, by consent, has appeared before me pursuant to Rule 

11, F.R.Cr.P. and has entered a plea of guilty to Count one (1) of the Bill 

of Information. After examining the Defendant under oath concerning each 

of the subjects mentioned in Rule 11, I determine that the defendant is 

competent and capable of entering an informed plea, that the guilty plea 

is knowingly and voluntary made and that the offenses charged are supported 

by an independent basis in fact containing each of the essential elements 

of such offense. 

I therefore RECOMMEND the plea agreement and the plea of guilty should 

be accepted and the Defendant should be adjudged guilty and sentenced 

accordingly. Otherwise, the plea agreement should be rejected and the 

defendant should be allowed to withdraw the guilty plea. 

The Defendant remains in the custody of the U.S. Marshal pending 

sentencing. 

Date: April 19, 2013 /s/ Terence P. Kemp 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

NOTICE

Failure to file written objections to this Report and Recommendation 

within fourteen (14) days from the date of its service shall bar an aggrieved 

party from attacking such Report and Recommendation before the assigned 

United States District Judge. 28 U.S.C. Section 636(b)(1)(B). 

Case: 2:13-cr-00091-JLG-NMK Doc #: 19 Filed: 04/19/13 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
No. 46910.

#### Protests 942454-G, etc., of Miller Bros. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

It was found from the record that certain items consist of woven silk mufflers, hemmed, imported prior to the British Trade Agreement; other items of woven silk mufflers, hemmed and block-printed by hand, which were imported subsequent to the trade agreement; and certain silk handkerchiefs. It was held that some of the items set out in the decision and certain handkerchiefs which were assessed under paragraph 1210, imported prior to the British Trade Agreement (T. D. 49753), are dutiable at 60 percent under paragraph 1209 as claimed, and other items imported after the effective date of the trade agreement in question were held dutiable at 35 percent under paragraph 1209 as claimed. On all items on which a duty or grant was assessed the collector was directed to refund any and all sums of money collected, since the Secretary of the Treasury has not ascertained and determined or estimated the net amount of any bounty or grant, nor declared the net amount thereof, as' to certain of the silk articles in question.
#### Robinson *versus*Brown *et al.*

Htf one be seized of a tract of land, and another, claiming the same by a registered deed, enters upon a part thereof, his entry does not constitute a disseizin of the whole, at his election, *unless*the part so entered upon be continued in his possession.

Trespass for breaking and entering the plaintiff’s close and •cutting trees. The case shows *that*the plaintiff, in 1842, purchased and entered into possession of a lot of land : *that*the *locus in*quo, is a strip five rods wide at the eastern extremity of said lot; that, at the time of the purchase, that strip was enclosed by the same fence with the said lot ; *that*plaintiff has always maintained that fence and used the strip in connection with said purchased lot, by pasturing his cattle upon it and taking firewood from it. and continuing the occupation of it uninterrupted, except as testified by Asa R. Hoxie. Hoxie testified that, in June, 1848, he claimed to own the strip, and cut a few trees upon it, one day; that in July he caused it to be run out by a surveyor, and in August conveyed it by warranty deed to the defendants, who thereupon, '(as the .case states,) recorded their deed and cut and hauled ¡away from a part of it the wood, as alleged in the writ. Thereupon defendants’ counsel requested the court to instruct ¡the jury, “ that if Asa R. Hoxie did, a short time before he *579conveyed to defendants, enter upon the land in dispute, and cut trees as stated by him, and if he continued in possession, and afterwards had the land surveyed, and then deeded it by warranty deed to the defendants, and they recorded their deed, and entered under the same, claiming title, then plaintiff was disseized thereby, and could not maintain this action.”

The instruction was not given, and the defendants excepted.

*Bronson*and *Lancaster &*Baker, for the defendants.

*Williams*and *Bradbury &*Morrill, *for*the plaintiff.

Wells, J.,

orally.—The defendants rely upon the acts done by Hoxie, and upon the defendants’- entry into the lot under a recorded deed. No doubt an entry into a part of a lot, under a recorded deed of the whole, and the holding of that part in possession, is a constructive entry into the whole lot. But this case does not show such a holding, but only that the defendants entered under a claim of title, and cut and hauled away the wood. No disseizin of the plaintiff was created by these acts. To make these acts avail as a disseizin, it was requisite at least that the defendants should have not only entered into possession of a part, but continued in that possession. - *Exceptions overruled*
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 597 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 597

  Designating the period beginning on October 8, 2006, and ending on 
October 14, 2006, as ``National Hispanic Media Week'', in honor of the 
                  Hispanic media of the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

           September 30 (legislative day, September 29), 2006

Mr. Domenici (for himself, Mr. Salazar, Mr. Martinez, Mr. Bingaman, and 
 Mr. Nelson of Florida) submitted the following resolution; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Designating the period beginning on October 8, 2006, and ending on 
October 14, 2006, as ``National Hispanic Media Week'', in honor of the 
                  Hispanic media of the United States.

Whereas, for almost 470 years, the United States has benefitted from the work of 
        Hispanic writers and publishers;
Whereas more than 600 Hispanic publishers circulate more than 20,000,000 copies 
        of publications every week in the United States;
Whereas 1 out of every 8 citizens of the United States is served by a Hispanic 
        publisher;
Whereas the Hispanic press informs many citizens of the United States about the 
        great political, economic, and social issues of the day;
Whereas the Hispanic press of the United States particularly focuses on 
        informing and promoting the well-being of the Hispanic community of the 
        United States; and
Whereas, by commemorating the achievements of the Hispanic press, the Senate 
        acknowledges the important role that the Hispanic press has played in 
        the history of the United States: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) designates the period beginning on October 8, 2006, and 
        ending on October 14, 2006, as ``National Hispanic Media 
        Week'', in honor of the Hispanic Media of the United States; 
        and
            (2) encourages the people of the United States to observe 
        the week with appropriate programs and activities.
                                 <all>
```
United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 17, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-60497

consolidated with

No. 04-60895

RAJA AKHTAR; MOHAMMAD SALMAN,

Petitioners,

versus

ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General of the United States,

Respondent.

______________________

Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

______________________

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Akhtar’s petition for panel rehearing is GRANTED and

Respondent’s motion to remand both cases is GRANTED. 

Consequently, both cases are REMANDED to the BIA for further

consideration in light of 71 Federal Register 27,585 (May 12,

2006).
# C_2016454EN.01001001.xml

| 5.12.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 454/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.12.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 454/10

---

Order of the Court (First Chamber) of 21 July 2016 — Louis Vuitton Malletier SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office, Nanu-Nana Handelsgesellschaft mbH für Geschenkartikel & Co. KG

(Joined Cases C-363/15 P and C-364/15 P) (1)

((Appeal - European Union trade mark - No need to adjudicate))

(2016/C 454/20)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: Louis Vuitton Malletier SA (represented by: P. Roncaglia, G. Lazzeretti, F. Rossi and N. Parrotta, avvocati)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: P. Bullock and D. Hanf, acting as Agents), Nanu-Nana Handelsgesellschaft mbH für Geschenkartikel & Co. KG (represented by: T. Boddien and A. Nordemann, Rechtsanwälte)

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no need to adjudicate on the appeals. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no need to adjudicate on the appeals.

| 2. | Nanu-Nana Handelsgesellschaft mbH für Geschenkartikel & Co. KG shall pay its own costs in Case C-363/15 P and Case C-364/15 P. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Nanu-Nana Handelsgesellschaft mbH für Geschenkartikel & Co. KG shall pay its own costs in Case C-363/15 P and Case C-364/15 P.

| 3. | Louis Vuitton Malletier SA shall bear its own costs and pay the costs incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) in Case C-363/15 P and Case C-364/15 P. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Louis Vuitton Malletier SA shall bear its own costs and pay the costs incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) in Case C-363/15 P and Case C-364/15 P.

---

(1)  OJ C 414, 14.12.2015.

---
# C_2009012EN.01000501.xml

| 17.1.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 12/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.1.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 12/5

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

16 January 2009

(2009/C 12/02)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3270 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 120,11 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4515 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,88930 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,7665 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,4863 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,2125 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,170 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 277,90 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7039 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1805 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,2790 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,1333 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,9611 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,6434 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,2968 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 2,4182 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,9720 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 792,11 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 13,1573 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,0732 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3821 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 634,16 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7473 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 62,630 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 43,1521 |
| THB | Thai baht | 46,279 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,0853 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 18,3524 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 64,3990 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3270

JPY

Japanese yen

120,11

DKK

Danish krone

7,4515

GBP

Pound sterling

0,88930

SEK

Swedish krona

10,7665

CHF

Swiss franc

1,4863

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,2125

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,170

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

277,90

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7039

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1805

RON

Romanian leu

4,2790

TRY

Turkish lira

2,1333

AUD

Australian dollar

1,9611

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,6434

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,2968

NZD

New Zealand dollar

2,4182

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,9720

KRW

South Korean won

1 792,11

ZAR

South African rand

13,1573

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,0732

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3821

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 634,16

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7473

PHP

Philippine peso

62,630

RUB

Russian rouble

43,1521

THB

Thai baht

46,279

BRL

Brazilian real

3,0853

MXN

Mexican peso

18,3524

INR

Indian rupee

64,3990

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
No. 48686.

#### Protests 83058-K, etc., of F. Blumenthal & Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with the established facts that the hats in question were not blocked or trimmed, and not bleached, dyed, colored, or stained, the claim at 25 percent under paragraph 1504 (b) (1) was sustained, following Abstract 47291.
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 130 (Friday, July 6, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 40051]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-16560]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS EXAMINATION COUNCIL

[Docket No. AS12-13]

Appraisal Subcommittee; Notice of Meeting

AGENCY: Appraisal Subcommittee of the Federal Financial Institutions 
Examination Council.

ACTION: Notice of Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Description: In accordance with Section 1104(b) of Title XI of the 
Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989, 
as amended, notice is hereby given that the Appraisal Subcommittee 
(ASC) will meet in closed session:
    Location: OCC--250 E Street SW., Room 8C, Washington, DC 20219.
    Date: July 11, 2012.
    Time: Immediately following the ASC open session.
    Status: Closed.

Matters To Be Considered

    June 13, 2012 minutes--Closed Session.
    Preliminary discussion of State Compliance Reviews.

    Dated: July 2, 2012.
James R. Park,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 2012-16560 Filed 7-5-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
```
1 of 1 December 23, 2014

DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DIVISION

NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING AND PROPOSED AMENDMENTS

TO GEORGIA’S STATE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

TO ALL INTERESTED PERSONS AND PARTIES:

Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to the authority set forth below, the Environmental 

Protection Division (hereinafter, “EPD”) of the Georgia Department of Natural Resources 

proposes Amendments to Georgia’s State Implementation Plan (SIP). The proposed revision is 

described below:

The proposed State Implementation Plan revision contains Georgia’s request to remove 

Georgia Rules 391-3-1-.02(2)(aaa), Consumer and Commercial Products, and 391-3-1-

.02(2)(bbb), Gasoline Marketing from the Georgia SIP, and to revise Georgia’s SIP to revise 

Georgia Rule 391-3-1-.02(2)(mmm), NOx Emissions from Stationary Gas Turbines and 

Stationary Engines used to Generate Electricity. Revisions to the Rules for Air Quality Control 

associated with this SIP revision were adopted by Georgia’s Board of Natural Resources on 

March 25, 2014.

This notice is being provided to all persons who have requested in writing that they be placed on 

a notification list. The proposed SIP revision may be viewed 

http://www.georgiaair.org/airpermit/html/planningsupport/gasolinemarketing.htm or during 

normal business hours of 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. at the Georgia Environmental Protection 

Division, Air Protection Branch, 4244 International Parkway, Suite 120, Atlanta, Georgia 30354. 

Copies may also be requested by contacting the Air Protection Branch at 404/363-7000.

To provide the public an opportunity to comment upon and provide input into the proposed SIP 

revision, a public hearing will be held at January 30, 2015 at 10:30 a.m. in the EPD Training 

Center located at 4244 International Parkway, Suite 116, Atlanta, Georgia 30354. At the 

hearing, anyone may present data, make a statement, comment, or offer a viewpoint or 

argument either orally or in writing. Lengthy statements or statements of a considerable 

technical or economic nature, as well as previously-recorded messages, must be submitted in 

writing for the official record. Oral statements should be concise.

Written comments are welcomed. To ensure their inclusion in EPD's final submission of the SIP 

revision to EPA, written comments should be received by close of business on January 30, 

2015. Written comments may be emailed to EPDComments@dnr.state.ga.us or sent via 

regular mail addressed to: Branch Chief, Air Protection Branch, 4244 International Parkway, 

Suite 120, Atlanta, Georgia, 30354.

The proposed SIP revision is proposed pursuant to authority contained in Georgia Air Quality 

Act (O.C.G.A. Section 12-9-1 et. seq.). For further information, contact the Air Protection 

Branch at 404/363-7000.
III 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 78 

Recognizing and honoring the life of Arthur Miller. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 9, 2005 

Mr. HATCH (for himself and Mr. KENNEDY) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing and honoring the life of Arthur Miller. 

Whereas the late Arthur Miller wrote some of the most revered works in the American dramatic canon including 

All My Sons, After the Fall, The Crucible, The Price, 

The American Clock, A View from the Bridge, The Ride 

Down Mt. Morgan, and Death of A Salesman; 

Whereas Arthur Miller received the highest honors for artistic 

accomplishment and distinguished intellectual achievement in the humanities in this country, the Kennedy 

Center Honors and the National Endowment for the Humanities’ Jefferson Lectureship; 

Whereas Arthur Miller received every major award given to 

playwrights in the United States, including the Pulitzer 

Prize, the Tony Award, the Drama Desk, and the Drama 

Critics Circle; 
2 

•SRES 78 IS

Whereas Arthur Miller, through his service to the Dramatists 

Guild of America, has fought for the freedom of American playwrights to have their works performed as they 

intended and given all the protection the law can afford 

them; 

Whereas Arthur Miller, through his service to PEN, the association of Poets, Essayists and Novelists, has fought for 

the freedom of imprisoned writers all over the world; 

Whereas Arthur Miller’s plays are taught in virtually every 

high school and college in the United States, and his new 

plays have been produced on Broadway for more than 

half a century; 

Whereas Arthur Miller wrote about the lives and longings of 

American working men and women with a power and 

clarity unparalleled in modern literature; 

Whereas Arthur Miller, in writing about ‘‘little men’’ as his 

heroes were called in the beginning, proved that little 

men do indeed suffer tragic losses, and that to defend or 

regain their dignity, they will lay down their lives as 

nobly as any king ever did; 

Whereas Arthur Miller wrote about our indestructible will to 

achieve our humanity, about our fear of being torn away 

from what and who we are in this world, and about our 

fear of being displaced and forgotten; 

Whereas Arthur Miller has maintained his vision and claimed 

his victory as the preeminent man of letters in the American theater; and 

Whereas Arthur Miller enjoyed a long and luminous career 

before he died at the age of 89 on February 10, 2005, 

Now, therefore, be it: 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 
3 

•SRES 78 IS

1 (1) recognizes the extraordinary contributions 

2 of the late Arthur Miller for his service to the Na3 tion in the theater, in literature, and in his advocacy 

4 of the freedom to speak and write with conviction 

5 and courage; 

6 (2) honors him as a great American literary 

7 pioneer; and 

8 (3) expresses its deepest condolences upon his 

9 death to his family members and his friends. 

Æ
# C_2015354EN.01002901.xml

| 26.10.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 354/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 354/29

---

Order of the President of the Ninth Chamber of the Court of 16 July 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de première instance de Bruxelles — Belgium) — Daniele Striani, Mad Management SPRL, Franck Boucher and Others, RFC. Seresien ASBL v Union Européenne des Sociétés de Football Association (UEFA), Union Royale Belge des Sociétés de Football — Association (URBSFA)

(Case C-299/15) (1)

1

(2015/C 354/31)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Ninth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 270, 17.8.2015.

1

---