alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal C 279/16 N

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 279 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4716 November 2004 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 279

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4716 November 2004

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | Commission |
| 2004/C 279/1 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |
| 2004/C 279/2 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.3563 — CVC/BASF PRINTING INKS) (1) | 2 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

Commission

2004/C 279/1

Euro exchange rates

1

2004/C 279/2

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.3563 — CVC/BASF PRINTING INKS) (1)

2

---

| | III   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | Commission |
| 2004/C 279/3 | Call for applications concerning the appointment of operators charged with providing universal electronic communications service in France | 3 |

III   Notices

Commission

2004/C 279/3

Call for applications concerning the appointment of operators charged with providing universal electronic communications service in France

3

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| 2004/C 279/4 | 1 November 2004 — New version of EUR-Lex! | s3 |

2004/C 279/4

1 November 2004 — New version of EUR-Lex!

s3

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION

File Name: 11a0487n.06

Nos. 08-6374, 09-5047

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

ANTONIO GOINS; WILLIAM FREEMAN,

Defendants-Appellants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

ON APPEAL FROM THE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT

COURT FOR THE WESTERN

DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY

BEFORE: BOGGS, ROGERS, and WHITE, Circuit Judges.

ROGERS, Circuit Judge. These consolidated cases addressed whether defendants who were

sentenced pursuant to Rule 11(c)(1)(C) plea agreements could qualify for sentence reductions based

on retroactive amendments to the Sentencing Guidelines. Both Goins and Freeman were charged

with drug and weapon offenses in 2005 and each entered a plea agreement pursuant to Rule

11(c)(1)(C). The district court accepted the pleas and entered judgment. Subsequently, the

Sentencing Commission amended the Guidelines to reduce the disparity in the treatment of crack

and powder cocaine and made the amendment retroactive. See U.S.S.G. Appx. C, Amend. 706, id.

§ 1B1.10. Goins and Freeman sought to have their sentences reduced, but the district court held that

this circuit’s precedent in United States v. Peveler, 359 F.3d 369 (6th Cir. 2004), precluded

modification of a sentence imposed pursuant to a Rule 11(c)(1)(C) plea agreement. This court

affirmed. United States v. Goins, 355 F. App’x 1 (6th Cir. 2009). The Supreme Court subsequently
Nos. 08-6374, 09-5047

United States v. Goins

granted certiorari and issued an opinion in Freeman’s case, reversing this court’s decision and

remanding the case. Freeman v. United States, No. 09-10245, 564 U.S. — (June 23, 2011). In light

of that decision, the Court issued a summary order granting certiorari and remanding Goins’s case. 

Goins v. United States, No.09-10246, 564 U.S. — (June 28, 2011). We now remand both cases to

the district court for proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court’s opinion.

- 2 -
No. 46301.

#### Protests 992953-G, etc., of Berolio Import Co. et al. (Baltimore, etc.).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
Exhibit 15

Letter Re: Unaudited Financial Information

Audit Committee of the
Board of Directors
TRW Inc.

We are aware of the incorporation by reference in the following registration
statements and in the related prospectuses of our report dated April 18, 2001
relating to the unaudited consolidated interim financial statements of TRW Inc.
that are included in its Forms 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2001.

|         |  |  |           | 
|-------- |  |  | --------- | 
|Form S-3 |  |  | 333-89133 | 
|        
|        
|        
|        
|Form S-3 |  |  | 333-48443 | 
|        
|        
|        
|        
|Form S-8 |  |  | 333-36052 | 
|        
|        
|        
|        
|Form S-8 |  |  | 333-27003 | 
|        
|        
|        
|        
|Form S-8 |  |  | 333-27001 | 
|        
|        
|        
|        
|Form S-8 |  |  | 333-20351 | 
|        
|        
|        
|        
|Form S-8 |  |  | 333-06633 | 
|        
|        
|        
|        
|Form S-8 |  |  | 333-03973 | 
|        
|        
|        
|        
|Form S-8 |  |  | 33-53503  | 
|        
|        
|        
|        
|Form S-8 |  |  | 33-29751  | 
|        
|        
|        
|        
|Form S-8 |  |  | 2-90748   | 
|        
|        
|        
|        
|Form S-8 |  |  | 2-64035   | 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

April 30, 2001
Cleveland, Ohio
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

-vsRICHARD M. SPRIGGS, SR.,

________________________________

Case No. 2:13-CR-0284 (01)

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

The Defendant, by consent, has appeared before me pursuant to

Rule 11, F.R.Cr.P. and has entered a plea of guilty to Counts one, two

and three of the Information. After examining the Defendant under

oath concerning each of the subjects mentioned in Rule 11, I determine

that the defendant is competent and capable of entering an informed

plea, that the guilty plea is knowingly and voluntary made and that

the offenses charged are supported by an independent basis in fact

containing each of the essential elements of such offense. 

 I therefore RECOMMEND the plea agreement and the plea of

guilty should be accepted and the Defendant should be adjudged guilty

and sentenced accordingly. Otherwise, the plea agreement should be

rejected and the defendant should be allowed to withdraw the guilty

plea. 

The Defendant remains on bond pending sentencing. 

Date: August 31, 2015 /s/ Terence P. Kemp 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE

Failure to file written objections to this Report and

Recommendation within fourteen (14) days from the date of its service

shall bar an aggrieved party from attacking such Report and

Recommendation before the assigned United States District Judge. 28

U.S.C. Section 636(b)(1)(B).

Case: 2:13-cr-00284-GCS Doc #: 107 Filed: 09/01/15 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
#### Marks & Rosenfeld, Inc. *v.*United States

No. 7583.

Entry Nos. 745069; 739209.

Invoices dated Stoke on Trent, England, December 31, 1945, etc.

Certified February 4, 1946, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., March 13, 1946, etc.

(Decided April 27, 1948)

*Siegel, Mandell & Davidson (Sidney Mandell*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Bao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Johnson, Judge:

This proceeding has been submitted upon a stipulation wherein the parties hereto have agreed that the issues involved in these reappraisements-are the same in all material respects as in the case of *United States*v. *Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp.,*33 C. C. P. A. 183, C. A. D. 334. The record in that case was admitted as part of the record herein.

In view of the aforesaid stipulation and accepting same as a statement of fact,, and in view of the decision cited, I find and hold that the export values of the merchandise are the values found by the appraiser, less any additions on entry by the importer by reason of advances by the appraiser in similar cases to equal the so-called British purchase tax.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 381 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 381

     Designating March 1, 2006, as National Sibling Connection Day.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 16, 2006

  Mr. Salazar (for himself, Mr. Ensign, Ms. Landrieu, Mr. Akaka, Mr. 
     Johnson, Mr. Kerry, and Mrs. Clinton) submitted the following 
    resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

                           February 28, 2006

             Committee discharged; considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
     Designating March 1, 2006, as National Sibling Connection Day.

Whereas sibling relationships are among the longest lasting and most significant 
        relationships in life;
Whereas brothers and sisters share history, memories, and traditions that bind 
        them together as family;
Whereas it is estimated that over 65 percent of children in foster care have 
        siblings, and are often separated when they are placed in the foster 
        care system, adopted, or confronted with different kinship placements;
Whereas children in foster care have a greater risk of emotional disturbance, 
        difficulties in school, and problems with relationships than their 
        peers;
Whereas the separation of siblings as children causes additional grief and loss;
Whereas organizations and private volunteers advocate for the preservation of 
        sibling relationships in foster care settings and provide siblings in 
        foster care with the opportunity to reunite;
Whereas Camp to Belong, a nonprofit organization founded in 1995 by Lynn Price, 
        heightens public awareness of the need to preserve sibling relationships 
        in foster care settings and gives siblings in foster care the 
        opportunity to reunite; and
Whereas Camp to Belong has reunited over 2,000 separated siblings across the 
        United States, the United States Virgin Islands, and Canada: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) designates March 1, 2006, as ``Siblings Connection 
        Day'';
            (2) encourages the people of the United States to celebrate 
        sibling relationships on this day; and
            (3) supports efforts to respect and preserve those sibling 
        relationships that are at risk of being disrupted due to the 
        placement of children into the foster care system.
                                 <all>
```
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

June 25, 2018

No. 04-18-00252-CR

Benjamin ESCOBEDO,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 227th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016CR4634

Honorable Kevin M. O'Connell, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

After we granted the reporter’s first two requests for extensions of time to file the 

reporter’s record, the reporter’s record was due on July 3, 2018. See TEX. R. APP. P. 35.1. 

Before the extended due date, court reporter Carol N. Castillo filed a third notification of late 

reporter’s record. The notification included a status report indicating the number of pages 

remaining. The court reporter requests an extension of time to file the record until July 5, 2018.

The request is GRANTED. The reporter’s record is due not later than July 5, 2018.

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 25th day of June, 2018.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
An Interdisciplinary Study of the Health, 

Social and Environmental Economics of 

Sulfur Oxide Pollution in Florida. 

A. E. S. Green, S.V. Berg, E.T. Loehman, M.E. Shaw, R.W. Fahien, R.H. Hedinger, 

A.A. Arroyo, and V.H. De 

Interdisciplinary Center for Aeronomy and (other) Atmospheric Sciences 

University of Florida 

Gainesville, Florida 

1978
Case No. 14,614.

#### UNITED STATES v. BLUM.

[See Case No. 15,922.]
Case: 2:12-cv-01184-EAS-EPD Doc #: 57 Filed: 11/15/13 Page: 1 of 1  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-08T10:11:14-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO.: 2:13-CR-173

JUDGE SMITH

MAGISTRATE JUDGE DEAVERS

FRANCISCO GONZALES-ROBLES,

Defendant.

ORDER

On September 18, 2013, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), recommending that the Court accept Defendant’s plea of guilty to an

Indictment charging him with illegally re-entering the United States after having been removed as

an aggravated felon, in violation of 8 U.S.C. §1326(a) and (b)(2). Defendant, represented by

counsel, waived his right to appear on the matter before a District Judge. The Magistrate Judge

conducted the colloquy required by Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. 

Defendant’s plea was knowing, voluntary, free from coercion, and had a basis in fact. 

Defendant was specifically informed of his right to contest the Report and Recommendation

by filing any objections within 14 days of the issuance of the Report and Recommendation pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(B) and Rule 72(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Defendant did

not file any objections. 

Case: 2:13-cr-00173-GCS Doc #: 27 Filed: 10/10/13 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation and ACCEPTS

Defendant’s plea of guilty to the Indictment. Defendant is hereby adjudged guilty of illegally reentering the United States after having been removed as an aggravated felon.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 /s/ George C. Smith 

GEORGE C. SMITH, JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

-2-

Case: 2:13-cr-00173-GCS Doc #: 27 Filed: 10/10/13 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
# C_2014448EN.01003901.xml

| 15.12.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 448/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.12.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 448/39

---

Action brought on 4 September 2014 — ZZ v European Commission

(Case F-90/14)

(2014/C 448/49)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: Hans-Robert Ilting, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Application, first, to set aside the decision not to grant the applicant the child allowance from 1 September 2013 because his child is no longer receives ‘educational or vocational training’ within the meaning of Article 2 of Annex VII of the Staff Regulations of officials and, second, to oblige his employer to continue to grant him that allowance and to reimburse him all medical expenses for his daughter retroactively from 1 September 2013.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the Commission’s decision, reference HR.D.2/AS/ac/Ares(2014) of 5 June 2014 relating to his complaint, registered on 12 February 2014 with HR.D.2, ‘Appeals and case monitoring’, under reference no R/227/14; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the Commission’s decision, reference HR.D.2/AS/ac/Ares(2014) of 5 June 2014 relating to his complaint, registered on 12 February 2014 with HR.D.2, ‘Appeals and case monitoring’, under reference no R/227/14;

| — | oblige the appointing authority to recognise his daughter, continuously and retroactively from 1 September 2013, as being a dependent child in education and for this reason to continue to grant the child allowance for his daughter continuously and retroactively from 1 September 2013 and to continue to provide, continuously and retroactively from 1 September 2013, his daughter’s medical expenses. |
| --- | --- |

—

oblige the appointing authority to recognise his daughter, continuously and retroactively from 1 September 2013, as being a dependent child in education and for this reason to continue to grant the child allowance for his daughter continuously and retroactively from 1 September 2013 and to continue to provide, continuously and retroactively from 1 September 2013, his daughter’s medical expenses.

---
(Reap. Dec. 9783)

#### A. W. Faber Castell Pencil Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States

Entry No. N-1900, etc.

(Decided September 22, 1960)

*Sharretts, Paley & Garter*for the plaintiffs.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Mollis on, Judge:

Counsel for the parties have submitted the appeals for reappraisement enumerated in schedule A, attached hereto, for decision upon stipulation reading as follows:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the parties hereto that the merchandise covered by the appeals for reappraisement enumerated in Schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, consists of drawing pencils, pencil sharpeners and blades, charcoal pencils and sets of pencils exported from Germany between June 1958 and October 1959.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that said merchandise is on the list of products published in T.D. 54521 which is subject to the provisions of section 402a of the Tariff Act of 1930 and that there is no foreign, export or United States value as described in sections 402a(c) (d) or (e), respectively, for said merchandise.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the costs of production as described in section 402a (f) for said merchandise is as enumerated in Schedule B, hereto attached and made a part hereof.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that these appeals be submitted on this stipulation, said appeals being limited to the merchandise described on said Schedule B and abandoned in all other respects.

Accepting the foregoing stipulation as establishing the facts therein recited, I find that cost of production, as defined in section 402a(f), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, is the proper basis for the determina*481tion of tlie value of the merchandise involved, and that such value in each case is as set forth in schedule B, attached hereto and made a part hereof.

As to any items not enumerated in schedule B, the appeals, having been abandoned, are to that extent dismissed.

Judgment will issue accordingly.

Schedule B
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Consumers Financial Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Jack I. Ehrenhaus, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

      (1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of the
            operation of the Company.


-------------------------------------
Jack I. Ehrenhaus
Chief Financial Officer
January 13, 2005
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

In accordance with Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the following meeting: 

*Name:*                         Advisory Committee for Computer and Information Science and Engineering (#1115).                     

*Date/Time:*                         May 11, 2007; 1 p.m. to 4 p.m.                     

*Place:*                         National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Room 1120, Arlington, Virginia.                     

*Type of Meeting:*                         Open (Teleconference).                     

*Contact Person:*                         Rita Koch, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230, (703) 292-8900.                     

If you are attending the meeting and need access to the NSF, please contact the individual listed above so your name may be added to the building access list. 

*Purpose of Meeting:*                         To provide advice concerning the NSF programs in computer and information science and engineering.                     

*Agenda:*                         Discussion of current programs, initiatives and future budget cycle.                     

Dated: April 24, 2007. 

Susanne Bolton, 

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. E7-8058 Filed 4-26-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
# C_2017300EN.01000201.xml

| 11.9.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 300/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.9.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 300/2

---

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 18 July 2017 — European Commission v Patrick Breyer, Republic of Finland, Kingdom of Sweden

(Case C-213/15 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - Access to documents of the institutions - Article 15(3) TFEU - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Scope - Application for access to written submissions filed by the Republic of Austria in the case in which judgment was given on 29 July 2010, Commission v Austria (C-189/09, not published, EU:C:2010:455) - Documents in the possession of the European Commission - Protection of court proceedings))

(2017/C 300/02)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Appellant: European Commission (represented by: P. Van Nuffel and H. Krämer, acting as Agents)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: Patrick Breyer (represented by: M. Starostik, Rechtsanwalt), Republic of Finland (represented by: H. Leppo, acting as Agent), Kingdom of Sweden (represented by: A. Falk, C. Meyer-Seitz, E. Karlsson and L. Swedenborg, acting as Agents)

Other parties to the proceedings:

Interveners in support of the applicant: Kingdom of Spain (represented by: M.J. García-Valdecasas Dorrego and S. Centeno Huerta, acting as Agents), French Republic (represented by: G. de Bergues, D. Colas, R. Coesme and F. Fize, acting as Agents)

Interveners in support of the applicant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders the Commission to bear its own costs and to pay half of the costs incurred by Mr Breyer; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Commission to bear its own costs and to pay half of the costs incurred by Mr Breyer;

| 3. | Orders the Kingdom of Spain, the French Republic, the Republic of Finland and the Kingdom of Sweden to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Kingdom of Spain, the French Republic, the Republic of Finland and the Kingdom of Sweden to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 245, 27.7.2015.

1

---