alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsA noncontacting scanning photoelectron emission technique for bonding surface cleanliness inspectionMolecular contamination of bonding surfaces can drastically affect the bond strength that can be achieved and therefore the structural integrity and reliability of the bonded part. The presence of thin contaminant films on bonding surfaces can result from inadequate or incomplete cleaning methods, from oxide growth during the time between cleaning (such as grit blasting) and bonding, or from failure to properly protect cleaned surfaces from oils, greases, fingerprints, release agents, or deposition of facility airborne molecules generated by adjacent manufacturing or processing operations. Required cleanliness levels for desired bond performance can be determined by testing to correlate bond strength with contaminant type and quantity, thereby establishing the degree of contamination that can be tolerated based on the strength that is needed. Once the maximum acceptable contaminant level is defined, a method is needed to quantitatively measure the contaminant level on the bonding surface prior to bonding to verify that the surface meets the established cleanliness requirement. A photoelectron emission technique for the nondestructive inspection of various bonding surfaces, both metallic and nonmetallic, to provide quantitative data on residual contaminant levels is described. The technique can be used to scan surfaces at speeds of at least 30 ft/min using a servo system to maintain required sensor to surface spacing. The fundamental operation of the photoelectron emission sensor system is explained and the automated scanning system and computer data acquisition hardware and software are described.Document ID19890015252Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsGause, Raymond L.*(NASA Marshall Space Flight Center Huntsville, AL, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateFebruary 1, 1989Subject CategoryQuality Assurance And ReliabilityReport/Patent NumberNASA-TM-100361NAS 1.15:100361Accession Number89N24623Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19890015252.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Order Entered October 5,, 2016 

# S

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-16-01095-CV
IN RE: CC FORBES, LLC, FORBES ENERGY SERVICES, LTD, FORBES ENERGY SERVICES DELAWARE, LLC, AND TX EN ERGY SERVICES, LLC, Relators

Original Proceeding from the 191st Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-14-12627



### ORDER Before Justices Bridge s, Myers, and Whitehill

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS this original proceeding.

Relators shall bear the costs of th is original proceeding, if any.

/s/ BILL WHITEHILL JUSTICE
# Boar d o f Collie rCount yCommissioner s

Donn a Fial a Distric t 1 Fran k Hala s Distric t 2 To m Hennin g Distric t 3 Fre d W . Coyl e Distric t 4 Ji m Colett a Distric t 5 Septembe r

13,201 0

C D 1— 5 Th e llonorabl e Ray LaHood , Secretar y U S Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenu e S E Washington , D C 2059 0 Dea r Secretar y LaHood : CO. . Pleas e accep t

thi s lette r

o f suppor t o nbehal f

o f th e Cit y o f

Naple s Airport

Authority' s applicatio nfo

r aSmal l Communit y Airpor t Grant . Thi s i s agrea t

fmancial opportunit y fo r th e local airport

servin g ou r

community . Du e to recen t

event s suc ha s th e fmancia l recessio nan dth e Deepwate r Horizo noi l spill . Collie r County' s larges t

economi c contributo r

- touris m- ha s bee ngreatl y affected . Thi s $280,00 0 i ngran t

monie s wil l certainl y g o alon g wa y inaidin g th e stabilit y an d maintenanc e o f

ou r airport facilitj' . I appreciat e you r

consideratio nan dopportunit y thi s ma y provid e t o ou r Naple s Airport . Sincerely , 

### ""^Z-^-CJLO J Fre dW . Coyle , Chairma n Commissioner , Distric t

4 FWC/ms t

W . Harmo n Turne rBuildin g • 330 1 Eas t Tamiam i Trai l • Naples , Florid a 3411 2 • 239-252-809 7 • FA X 239-252-360 2
# Official Journal C 292/2021

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 292 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6422 July 2021 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 292

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6422 July 2021

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2021/C 292/01 | Euro exchange rates — 21 July 2021 | 1 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2021/C 292/01

Euro exchange rates — 21 July 2021

1

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2021/C 292/02 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10359 — Carsales Holdings/Goldman Sachs/Eurazeo/Open Road) – Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 2 |
| 2021/C 292/03 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10284 — KPS/Crown European Tinplate) (
  1
  ) | 4 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2021/C 292/02

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10359 — Carsales Holdings/Goldman Sachs/Eurazeo/Open Road) – Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

2

2021/C 292/03

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10284 — KPS/Crown European Tinplate) (
  1
  )

1

4

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
# C_2008312EN.01000701.xml

| 6.12.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 312/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.12.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 312/7

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

5 December 2008

(2008/C 312/04)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2665 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 116,91 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4495 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,86660 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,5788 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5380 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 290,00 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,1420 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,765 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 265,32 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7093 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,8865 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,8558 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 30,190 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,0100 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,9895 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,6354 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,8164 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 2,4016 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,9309 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 860,81 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 13,0880 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,7150 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,1816 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 754,73 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6069 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 62,120 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 35,7265 |
| THB | Thai baht | 45,170 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,2246 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,3099 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2665

JPY

Japanese yen

116,91

DKK

Danish krone

7,4495

GBP

Pound sterling

0,86660

SEK

Swedish krona

10,5788

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5380

ISK

Iceland króna

290,00

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,1420

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,765

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

265,32

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7093

PLN

Polish zloty

3,8865

RON

Romanian leu

3,8558

SKK

Slovak koruna

30,190

TRY

Turkish lira

2,0100

AUD

Australian dollar

1,9895

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,6354

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,8164

NZD

New Zealand dollar

2,4016

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,9309

KRW

South Korean won

1 860,81

ZAR

South African rand

13,0880

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,7150

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,1816

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 754,73

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6069

PHP

Philippine peso

62,120

RUB

Russian rouble

35,7265

THB

Thai baht

45,170

BRL

Brazilian real

3,2246

MXN

Mexican peso

17,3099

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
DISMISS; and Opinion Filed April 8, 2013.

S

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-13-00396-CV

IN RE LAKEITH AMIR-SHARIF, Relator

On Appeal from the 255th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DF-09-7655-S

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices O'Neill, Lang-Miers, and Evans 

Opinion by Justice Lang-Miers

Relator contends that the trial judge improperly issued an order setting a trial date on 

February 19, 2013, after his motion to recuse was filed, and that the Honorable Judge John 

Ovard did not properly handle his recusal motion. The facts and issues are well known to the 

parties, so we need not recount them herein. With respect to the trial judge, based on the record 

before us, we conclude relator has not shown he is entitled to the relief requested. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 52.8(a); Simon v. Levario, 306 S.W.3d 318, 320-21 (Tex. Crim. App. 2009) (orig. 

proceeding); State of Tex. ex rel. Hill v. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Dist., 34 S.W.3d 924, 927 

(Tex. Crim. App. 2001) (orig. proceeding). Accordingly, we DENY relator’s petition for writ of 

mandamus to the extent it seeks relief against the trial court.

With respect to the administrative judge, this Court does not have mandamus jurisdiction 

over Judge Ovard for actions he takes as presiding judge of the administrative region. See TEX.
–2–

GOV’T CODE ANN. § 222.221 (West 2004); In re ES Energy Solutions, LP, No. 05-10-01158-CV, 

2010 WL 3720219, at * 1 (Tex. App. – Dallas Sept. 24, 2010, orig. proceeding); In re Hill, No. 

05-10-00463-CV, 2010 WL 1633716, at *1 (Tex.App.-Dallas Apr. 23, 2010, orig. proceeding). 

Accordingly, we DISMISS relator’s petition for writ of mandamus for want of jurisdiction to the 

extent it seeks relief against Judge Ovard.

130396F.P05

/Elizabeth Lang-Miers/

ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS

JUSTICE
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v JOSEPH K. WORRELL, Torpedoman Seaman, U. S. Navy, Appellant

19 USCMA 487, 42 CMR 89

No. 22,728

June 5, 1970

*Captain Harry Lembeck,*USMCR, was on the pleadings for Appellant, Accused.

*Lieutenant Colonel Charles J. Keever,*USMC, was on the pleadings for Appellee, United States.

Opinion of the Court

Darden,Judge:

Records of Article 15 non judicial punishment for failing to obey a lawful order, two unauthorized absences, dereliction of duty, false official statements or documents, and misbehavior as a sentinel or lookout were erroneously used against Worrell as matters in aggravation following his conviction of an unauthorized absence that began June 2, 1969. United States v Johnson, 19 USCMA 464, 42 CMR 66 (1970). Reappraisal of the sentence is required. United States v Martin, 19 USCMA 486, 42 CMR 88 (1970).

Accordingly, the decision of the Court of Military Review is reversed as to sentence. The record of trial is returned to the Judge Advocate General of the Navy. A rehearing on the sentence may be ordered.

Chief Judge Quinn concurs.

Ferguson, Judge

(concurring in the result) :

I concur in the result for the reasons set forth in my separate opinion in United States v Johnson, 19 USCMA 464, 42 CMR 66 (1970).
No. 64331.

protests 279626-K, etc. (Buffalo).

#### C. J. Tower & Sons et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of prepared or preserved pork similar in all material respects to that the subject of *C. J. Tower & Sons*v. *United States*(43 Cust. Ct. 36, C.D. 2100), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LAURA IVETTE TOVAR-CAMACHO,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 11-70140

Agency No. A098-957-747

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 10, 2015**

Before: FARRIS, WARDLAW, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges. 

Laura Ivette Tovar-Camacho, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for 

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing her appeal 

from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying her application for asylum, 

withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

MAR 18 2015

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 11-70140

(“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for 

substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings. Zehatye v. Gonzales, 453 F.3d 

1182, 1184-85 (9th Cir. 2006). We deny in part and grant in part the petition for 

review, and we remand.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s denial of CAT relief because 

Tovar-Camacho failed to establish it is more likely than not that she would be 

tortured by or with the consent or acquiescence of the government if returned to 

Mexico. See Zheng v. Holder, 644 F.3d 829, 835-36 (9th Cir. 2011).

In denying Tovar-Camacho’s asylum and withholding of removal claims, 

the agency found she failed to establish the requisite nexus to a protected ground. 

When the IJ and BIA issued their decisions in this case, they did not have the 

benefit of this court’s decisions in Henriquez-Rivas v. Holder, 707 F.3d 1081 (9th 

Cir. 2013) (en banc), Cordoba v. Holder, 726 F.3d 1106 (9th Cir. 2013), and PirirBoc v. Holder, 750 F.3d 1077 (9th Cir. 2014), or the BIA’s decisions in Matter of 

M-E-V-G-, 26 I. & N. Dec. 227 (BIA 2014), and Matter of W-G-R-, 26 I. & N. 

Dec. 208 (BIA 2014). Thus, we remand Tovar-Camacho’s asylum and 

withholding of removal claims to determine the impact, if any, of these decisions. 

See INS v. Ventura, 537 U.S. 12, 16-18 (2002) (per curiam). In light of this 

remand, we do not reach Tovar-Camacho’s remaining challenges to the agency’s 

denial of her asylum and withholding of removal claims.
3 11-70140

The parties shall bear their own costs for this petition for review.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; GRANTED in part; 

REMANDED.
EPS Molders - EPA Meeting Regarding HBeD

. January 6, 2011 @2pm EPA East/Conn. Wing Room 4355XX Sign-In Sheet I NAME -

____ -..J-I

### A_F_F~L~IA"ION i TEL. NUMBER I EMAIL
! I

## EP.~ OPJ'7 ftlfl'7>

## ~·S66- 

## os-'S-­
. :

## ~.**7~** - 

### TCL-Jf' 

# IS**(~** 

# (-'--,**t-(,~\d:i~~(~-+--':;C=':j-";:;:"'1.(!-=-~~~--=_=-_~-=-l~_-~:_~..:-::....!...:::~~_~::.......::..~::-",-£..l:::_y":_~::_'--:** 'r--ArvYJRevJ**FJITY7..f,---+_B_It.~s.** 

### f

__ --+-----..:-

___ -I--

__

### ..!..-!-~_l 

## !-:lCt.(;**~<::./l** Morr; '...:.....1

### -4--'-'-------.,;:.......:..-.-'-----+------'-~**=..x:LLJAh.1~~.......r.IItMJ..lli.~~ I'a~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~** 

### r-~-I~~**~~h_~** __

### ~_~~~ ____

### ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 

# -b,uY'**--------~---**
Dave Heineman Governor

Michael Linder, Director Department of Environmental Quality 1200 N Street, Suite 400 Lincoln, NE 68509 March 27, 2012 

### STATE OF NEBRASKA Governor's Policy Research Office Lauren L. Hill, Director P.O. Box 94601 • Lincoln, Nebraska 68509-4601 Phone: (402) 471-2414 • Fax (402) 471-2528 

# RECEIVE MAR 2 8 

### 2012 Nebraska DeptofEnvironmentalQuality By: DEQ#059

# ----

RE: Title 129 NAC 1, 17, 19, 27 - Nebraska Air Quality Regulations Dear Mr. Linder: On March 27, 2012, the Governor approved the above-referenced regulations. The Governor's Policy Research Officefiled the regulationswiththe SecretaryofState's Office on March 27, 2012.

cc: Policy Advisor GPRO File Sincerely,
l Barb Damewood Administrative Assistant

An Equal Opportunity/AffirmativeAction Employer Printed with soy ink on recycled paper 

# - !!!!!!! 

# -
Before the First Division,

June 6, 1946

No. 51181.

#### Protest 993180-G of Ashcraft-Wilkinson Co. (Norfolk).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise invoiced as kelp meal is the same as that the subject of *Centennial Flouring Mills Co.*v. *United States*(29 C. C. P. A. 264, C. A. D. 200) and Abstract 49792. In accordance therewith the claim for free entry under paragraph 1705 was sustained.
Mr. Allen 8. Conner, February 11, 1939, Page Q. 

history 0r the time, the oontamporsneoue olroumetmo4s, and 

the conditions leading to the enactment of ths amendment, 

to ascertain th+ ?urposr snd msenl~ or the amendment, 

and the language v&l]. be construed to further that purpoae. 

Ewme t. kal,ra, 170 Ter. 3S3, 40 6. I’,. (2nd) 31; San 

Anton10 Independent Sohool Dlstrlot v. State, (Clv. App. ) 

173 s. ::i. 5%; ..‘illtome v, Carroll, It:: S. ‘7. 29. The 

thing to be sou(.!lt 1s the thought af~reaced, (Cardova v. 

stnte, 0 cr. l-t. 207) alth the view of ascertaining and 

giving effect to the intent of the people who adopted the 

amendment. Collingsworth County v. Allred, 120 Tcx. 473, 

40 z. :;‘. (2nd) 13. 

It 1s n matter of oonmon knowleci;:e that tkJ-;c? anendmot was EOUf:ht in this instanoe solely to ellminnte the 

obsolete dueling olause. There wes no eu[;Ceetion of any 

other purpose to be arrected. In tsct, the very lanfusce 

of the amendr.lent indicates that the people intended that 

“all off iceran chould take the oath of offloe. “All Offlcers*ms both elective and appointive oi~flcere. 

Yet we should not impute to the -people of Texas an intention 

that appointive orflcers ahoul~d take er: oath embodyIng 

lani:uege wholly inapplicable to the zanner by which they 

acquired their office. 

Applylnc the rules of oonstltutional cooctruotion 

above stated, the conolusion Is olear. i:e therefore hold 

that, ln order to Give effect to the lntentlon Or the 

people in voting this amendment, all appointloo officers 

in thla State, Including ootarlre public, muet take the 

constitutional oath of offlco provided by the amendment, 

but that the oath as to them must conclude, after eliminatlng the viorde, e.. . for the giving or withholding a vote 

at the election at whloh 1 was cleated," after the word 

“reward ,* with theaa words, e... to seoure my appointment. 

So help me God.” 

Yours very truly 

ATTORNEY G W&RAL OF TEXAC 

By &&&.&&tAl 

EC. ‘A.. Falrohlld 

F&w : F BP _ Assistant 

APPRCVXD: 

r 

A ., (\.‘. 

AWORtiEX G?E?%XAL OF TEXAS 

6
```

[110th Congress Public Law 126]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ126.110]

[[Page 121 STAT. 1354]]

Public Law 110-126
110th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
235 Mountain Road in Suffield, Connecticut, as the ``Corporal Stephen R. 
      Bixler Post Office''. <<NOTE: Nov. 30, 2007 -  [H.R. 3325]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. CORPORAL STEPHEN R. BIXLER POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 235 Mountain Road in Suffield, Connecticut, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Corporal Stephen R. Bixler Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Corporal 
Stephen R. Bixler Post Office''.

    Approved November 30, 2007.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 3325:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 153 (2007):
            Oct. 1, considered and passed House.
            Nov. 16, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
(Reap. Dec. 9793)

#### The American International Products Corporation *v.*United States

Entry No. 934079, etc.

(Decided October 3, 1960)

*John D. Rode*for the plaintiff.

*George Oochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Wilson, Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation entered into between counsel for the respective parties;

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between counsel for the plaintiff and the Assistant Attorney General for the United States, subject to the approval of the Court, that the merchandise the subject of the above entitled appeals to reappraisement is properly dutiable on the basis of American Selling Price as defined in Section 402(g) Tariff Act of 1930 as amended and *498that the said American Selling Price was as follows for the export periods indicated.

> Item Period Price

> Pas Sodium_ 1959 $1.75 per lb. less *1%*net packed.

> Pas Calcium_ 1959 $2.75 per lb. less 1% net packed.

> IT IS FURTHER. STIPULATED AND AGREED that the appeals be deemed submitted for decision on this stipulation.

On tlie agreed facts, I find and hold American selling price, as that value is defined in section 402(g) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by section 8 of the Customs Administrative Act of 1938, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here in question, and that such value for each of the involved items at the time of exportation, heretofore indicated, was as hereinabove set forth in the stipulation of submission herein.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 September 30, 2013

s0923

Order 

Clerk

September 30, 2013

147045

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 147045

COA: 312330

Wayne CC: 07-021059-FC

MICHAEL TYRONE WITHERSPOON, a/k/a

MICHEAL T. WITHERSPOON,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 6, 2013 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER 

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Union Planters Corporation (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report") I, Jackson W. Moore, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company