alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### John J. Ryan & Sons, Inc. *v.*United States

No. 7603.

Entry Nos. 780444; 794632.

— Invoices dated Warsaw, Poland, December 5, 1938, etc. Certified December 5, 1938, etc. Entered at New York, N. Y., December 30, 1938, etc.

(Decided June 22, 1948)

*Sharrelts & Hillis (Howard C. Carter*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Mollison, Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement have been submitted for decision upon tbe following stipulation of counsel for tbe parties hereto:

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the attorneys for the parties hereto, subject to the approval of the court, that the export market value or price at the time of exportation of the merchandise involved herein, at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal market of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade for exportation to the United States, plus all costs, charges, and expenses incidental to placing the merchandise in condition, packed, ready for shipment to the United States, is the appraised unit value for each item, less 4% discount, plus the packing cost as found by the Appraiser and noted on the invoices in red ink.

IT IS PURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that there is no higher foreign value for the merchandise herein at the time of exportation.

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that these appeals be submitted on the foregoing stipulation.

On tbe agreed facts I find tbe export value, as tbat value is defined in section 402 (d) of tbe Tariff Act of 1930, to be tbe proper basis for tbe determination of tbe value of tbe merchandise bere involved, and tbat sucb value was tbe appraised unit value for eacb item, less 4 per centum discount, plus tbe packing cost as found by tbe appraiser and noted on tbe invoices in red ink.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
From: Brian Shrager <Shrager.Brian@epamail.epa.gov> To: combustionsurvey <combustionsurvey@erg.com> Date: 7/18/2011 10:01 AM Subject: New version of last letter I sent you... Attachments: Boiler MACT Letter.pdf

----- Forwarded by Brian Shrager/RTP/USEPA/US on 07/18/2011 10:01 AM

----- From: Nancy Tujague <ntujague@anga.us> To: Brian Shrager/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 07/18/2011 09:59 AM Subject: RE: Letter of Reconsideration Boiler MACT

Dear Mr. Shrager, Please us the attached letter. I accidentally sent you the incorrect file (it was an unsigned version). Many thanks, Nancy Tujague
Nancy Tujague America's Natural Gas Alliance Coordinator, Legislative & Regulatory Affairs 202-789-1303 701 Eighth St. NW, Suite 800 Washington, DC 20001

-----Original Message----- From: Nancy Tujague Sent: Sunday, July 17, 2011 1:53 AM To: shrager.brian@epa.gov Subject: Letter of Reconsideration Boiler MACT Dear Mr. Shrager, Please find attached a letter of reconsideration for the Boiler MACT rule from America's Natural Gas Alliance. Please let me know if you have any questions. Best, Nancy Nancy Tujague Coordinator, Legislative and Regulatory Affairs America's Natural Gas Alliance 701 Eighth Street, NW Washington, DC 20001(See attached file: Boiler MACT Letter.pdf)
1 

### Daniels, Nia (FAA)

From: Daniels, Nia (FAA)

Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2015 10:42 AM

To: 'luroyale@gmail.com'

Cc: '333exemptions@faa.gov' Subject: Request for Additional Informat ion: DroneWorks, Inc. (FAA-2015-0502)



### May 12, 2015

Dear Mr. Cadenas:

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA2015-0502). This information is necessary for the Fe deral Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

 Describe the aircraft makes, mode ls, and types (i.e. - fixed-wing,rotor craft, lighter-than-air) for the proposed UAS operation.

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit any proprietary information to the FAA Hea dquarters or electronically via e-mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov . If you want us to process your request a ny further, we must receive the information described above by May 26, 2015. If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

Nia Daniels Program Analyst

Nia Daniels, ARM

‐ 108

Federal Aviation Administration

Office of Rulemaking, Airmen & Airspace Rules Division

800 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20591

PH: (202) 267 ‐ 7626

Fax: (202) 267 ‐ 5075 nia.daniels@faa.gov
(Reap. Dec. 9248)

#### Intermaritime Fwdg. Co., Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 924419.

(Decided November 10, 1958)

*Tompkins & Tompkins*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Mollison, Judge:

Counsel for the parties herein have submitted this appeal for reappraisement upon a stipulation reading as follows:

> It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between counsel for the Plaintiff and the Assistant Attorney General for the United States, Defendant, that the items marked “A” and checked with the initials TJM by Examiner T. J. McCarthy on the invoice covered by the above-named reappraisement appeal consist of goat skins and that at the time of exportation to the United States the “export values” of said skins, as defined in Section 402 (d) Tariff Act of 1930, were the invoice unit prices, U. S. dollars, per square foot, packed, less 2%, less ocean freight of $32.00, less insurance of $6.50 and less U. S. import duty of $277.34, and that at the time of exportation there was no “foreign value” for said skins, as defined in Section 402 (c), Tariff Act of 1930.

On the agreed facts, I find that export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d), Tariff Act of 1930, is the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise involved, and that such value is the invoice unit prices, United States dollars, per square foot, packed, less 2 per centum, less ocean freight of $32, less insurance of $6.50, and less United States import duty of $277.34.

.Judgment‘will issue accordingly.
# Official Journal C 189/24 J

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 189 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4724 July 2004 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 189

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4724 July 2004

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | Commission |
| 2004/C 189/1 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

Commission

2004/C 189/1

Euro exchange rates

1

---

| | III   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | Commission |
| 2004/C 189/2 | Calls for proposals for indirect RTD actions under the specific programme for research, technological development and demonstration: ‘Integrating and strengthening the European Research Area’ | 2 |

III   Notices

Commission

2004/C 189/2

Calls for proposals for indirect RTD actions under the specific programme for research, technological development and demonstration: ‘Integrating and strengthening the European Research Area’

2

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 40 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. J. RES. 40

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
 Authorizing the printing and binding of a supplement to, and revised 
                     edition of, Senate Procedure.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of 
America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. PRINTING OF SUPPLEMENT TO, AND REVISED EDITION OF, SENATE PROCEDURE.

    (a) In General.--Each of the following documents shall be prepared under the 
supervision of Alan Frumin, Parliamentarian and Parliamentarian Emeritus of the 
Senate, and shall be printed and bound as a Senate document:
            (1) A supplement to ``Riddick's Senate Procedure'', to be styled 
        ``Frumin's Supplement to Riddick's Senate Procedure''.
            (2) A revised edition of ``Riddick's Senate Procedure'', to be 
        styled ``Frumin's Senate Procedure''.
    (b) Copies.--One thousand five hundred copies of each document described in 
subsection (a) shall be printed for distribution to Senators and for the use of 
the Senate.

            Passed the Senate June 29, 2006.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
109th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                             S. J. RES. 40

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 Authorizing the printing and binding of a supplement to, and revised 
                     edition of, Senate Procedure.
```
# Official Journal C 99A/26 M

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 99A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5826 March 2015 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 99A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5826 March 2015

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) |
| 2015/C 099A/01 | Notice of open competition — EPSO/AD/302/15 — Administrators in the field of audit (AD 5) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO)

2015/C 099A/01

Notice of open competition — EPSO/AD/302/15 — Administrators in the field of audit (AD 5)

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
# Biomass-Based Diesel Exports by Destination Page 1 of2



# ~ U.S. Energy Informatio n Administration 

# PE 'J'ROl FUM

••• .J

. . . ..J

... .1 

# & 

# O'l'll ER L , lQUlDS

OVERVIEW 

# I DATA 

# I ANALYSIS & PROJECTIONS

**GLOSS.~RY,** FAQS' 

# Exports 

# by Destination
Product: [ Biomass-Based Diesel 

# v j Period-Unit: 

# jAnnual- Thousand Barrels 

# v j

Show Dots By: View

**~** Dest ination 

## C Product History Total All Countries 

# D 1 ,748 3,056 4 ,675 1 ,974 20 11 -201 4 Argentina 

# D 0 0 2011-2012 Australia 

# D 38 225 105 2011-2013 Bahama Islands 

# D 0 2011-2012 Brazil 

# D 0 0 2011-2013 Cameroon 

# D 0 2014-2014 Canada 

# D 45 1 ,707 1,915 1 ,679 2011-2014 Cay man Istands 

# D 3 2013-2014 Chi le 

# D 2011-2011 China 

# D 0 0 2011-2012 Colombia 

# D 0 0 2011-2012 Congo (B razzaville) 

# D 0 2014-2014 Cos ta Rica 

# D 0 2011-2011 Dominican Republic 

# D 42 12 14 2011-2014 Ecuad or 

# D 53 71 2012-2013 Equatorial Guinea 

## 0 0 2013-2013 Estonia 

## ll 28 2011-2011 France 

# D 0 2011-2011 Germany 

# D 0 2011-2011 Ghana 

# D 0 2014-2014 Gibraltar 

# D 483 58 2013-2014 Guatemala 

# D 0 

### 0 2011-2012 Hong Kong 

# D 0 2012-2013 India 

# D 316 0 0 2011-201 4 Ireland 

# D 0 2011-2011 Israel 

# D 65 0 2011-2012 Italy 

# D 19 20 11

-2011 Jamaica 

# D 0 2014-2014 Japan 

# D 0 0 2011-2012 Korea , South 

# D 22 2011-2011 Malaysia 

### [] 52 1 ,005 2011-2013 Mexico 

## [J 2 0 4 2011-2014 Netherlands 

# D 612 121 0 2011-2014 Nicaragua 

# D 0 2013-2013 Nigeria 

# D 0 2013-2013 Norway 

### [] 165 602 2011-2012 Peru 

### [] 0 9 51 59 201 1-2014 Philippines 

# D 0 2013-2013 Puerto Rico 

# D 0 201 4-2014 Singapore 

# D 14 0 201 1 -2014 South Africa 0 0 2012-2014



# httn ://www eia_gov/clnav/net/net move exnc a EPOORDB EEX mbbl a.htm 1 1/25/20 15
III 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 402 

Designating the first day of April 2006 as ‘‘National Asbestos Awareness 

Day’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 15, 2006 

Mr. REID submitted the following resolution; which was considered and agreed 

to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating the first day of April 2006 as ‘‘National 

Asbestos Awareness Day’’. 

Whereas dangerous asbestos fibers are invisible and cannot 

be smelled or tasted; 

Whereas the inhalation of airborne asbestos fibers can cause 

significant damage; 

Whereas these fibers can cause mesothelioma, asbestosis, and 

other health problems; 

Whereas asbestos-related diseases can take 10 to 50 years to 

present themselves; 

Whereas the expected survival time for those diagnosed with 

mesothelioma is between 6 and 24 months; 

Whereas generally little is known about late stage treatment 

and there is no cure for asbestos-related diseases; 


rfake on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
2 

SRES 402 ATS

Whereas early detection of asbestos-related diseases may give 

some patients increased treatment options and might improve their prognosis; 

Whereas the United States has substantially reduced its consumption of asbestos yet continues to consume almost 

7,000 metric tons of the fibrous mineral for use in certain products throughout the Nation; 

Whereas asbestos-related diseases have killed thousands of 

people in the United States; 

Whereas asbestos exposures continue and safety and prevention will reduce and has reduced significantly asbestos exposure and asbestos-related diseases; 

Whereas asbestos has been a cause of occupational cancer; 

Whereas thousands of workers in the United States face significant asbestos exposure; 

Whereas thousands of Americans die from asbestos-related 

diseases every year; 

Whereas a significant percentage of all asbestos-related disease victims were exposed to asbestos on naval ships and 

in shipyards; 

Whereas asbestos was used in the construction of a significant number of office buildings and public facilities built 

before 1975; and 

Whereas the establishment of a ‘‘National Asbestos Awareness Day’’ would raise public awareness about the prevalence of asbestos-related diseases and the dangers of asbestos exposure: Now, therefore, be it 


rfake on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
3 

SRES 402 ATS

1 Resolved, That the Senate designates the first day of 

2 April 2006 as ‘‘National Asbestos Awareness Day’’. 

Æ 


rfake on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
# C_2017063EN.01000201.xml

| 27.2.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 63/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.2.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 63/2

---

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 11 January 2017 — Kingdom of Spain v Council of the European Union

(Case C-128/15) (1)

1

((Actions for annulment - Fisheries - Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013 - Regulation (EU) No 1367/2014 - Validity - Fishing opportunities - Precautionary approach - Principle of relative stability of fishing activities - Principle of proportionality - Principle of equal treatment - Roundnose grenadier and roughhead grenadier))

(2017/C 063/02)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Kingdom of Spain (represented by: A. Rubio González and L. Banciella Rodríguez-Miñón, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: A. Westerhof Löfflerová, A. de Gregorio Merino and F. Florindo Gijón, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Intervener in support of the defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Bouquet, I. Galindo Martín and A. Stobiecka-Kuik, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Order the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Order the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs;

| 3. | Order the European Commission to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Order the European Commission to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 155, 11.5.2015.

1

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

EASTERN DIVISION 

JOHN PATRICK MOORE, : 

 : 

 Plaintiff, : Case No. 2:12-CV-609 

 : 

 v. : JUDGE ALGENON L. MARBLEY 

 : 

BRENT CRUSE, et al. : Magistrate Judge King 

 : 

 Defendants. : 

ORDER 

This matter is before the Court on the United States Magistrate Judge’s Report and 

Recommendation. (Doc. 43). On December 16, 2013, the Magistrate Judge issued the Report 

and Recommendation, recommending that Defendants Cruse, Pfeifer, Thornhill, and Walker’s 

Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 31) be granted. Plaintiff was specifically advised of his 

right to object to this Report and Recommendation, and of the consequences of his failure to do 

so. (Doc. 43 at 14). Plaintiff has failed to respond. (See Doc. 44). The deadline for objections 

lapsed on Janurary 2, 2014. 

 The Court hereby ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation based on the independent 

consideration of the analysis therein. Accordingly, Defendants Cruse, Pfeifer, Thornhill, and 

Walker’s Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. This action is hereby DISMISSED. 

The Clerk shall enter final judgment. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 s/ Algenon L. Marbley 

 ALGENON L. MARBLEY 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

DATED: March 5, 2014

Case: 2:12-cv-00609-ALM-NMK Doc #: 45 Filed: 03/05/14 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
# Official Journal C 215/2015

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 215 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 581 July 2015 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 215

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 581 July 2015

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2015/C 215/01 | Communication from the Commission amending the Annex to the Communication from the Commission to the Member States on the application of Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union to short-term export-credit insurance | 1 |
| 2015/C 215/02 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.7647 — Bridgepoint/Nordic Cinema Group Holding) (
  1
  ) | 3 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2015/C 215/01

Communication from the Commission amending the Annex to the Communication from the Commission to the Member States on the application of Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union to short-term export-credit insurance

1

2015/C 215/02

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.7647 — Bridgepoint/Nordic Cinema Group Holding) (
  1
  )

1

3

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2015/C 215/03 | Euro exchange rates | 4 |
| 2015/C 215/04 | New national side of euro coins intended for circulation | 5 |
| | General Court |
| 2015/C 215/05 | Rules of Procedure of the General Court — Correlation table | 6 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2015/C 215/03

Euro exchange rates

4

2015/C 215/04

New national side of euro coins intended for circulation

5

General Court

2015/C 215/05

Rules of Procedure of the General Court — Correlation table

6

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2015/C 215/06 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.7645 — Mylan/Perrigo) (
  1
  ) | 23 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2015/C 215/06

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.7645 — Mylan/Perrigo) (
  1
  )

1

23

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED December 10, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-10835 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus ELIAS ARTEMIO MEDINA-SALINAS, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 1:03-CR-26-ALL

-------------------- Before DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Elias Artemio Medina-Salinas appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United States after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Medina-Salinas contends that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) define separate offenses. He argues that the prior conviction that resulted in his increased sentence is an element of a separate offense under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) that should have been alleged in his indictment. Medina-Salinas maintains that heNo. 03-10835 -2- pleaded guilty to an indictment which charged only simple reentry under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). He argues that his sentence exceeds the term of imprisonment which may be imposed for that offense.
In Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. Id. at 239-47. Medina-Salinas acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres , but asserts that the decision has been cast into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). He seeks to preserve his argument for further review. Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres
. See Apprendi , 530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit , 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000). This court must follow Almendarez-Torres “unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule it.” Dabeit , 231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). The judgment of the district court is
AFFIRMED. The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
Exhibit 4.6


 


Authorized Capital Stock


 


We
are authorized to issue up to 110,000,000 shares of our common stock, $0.0001 par value, there is no blank check preferred stock authorized.


 


Each
share of our common stock entitles its holder to one vote in the election of each director and on all other matters voted on generally
by our stockholders. No share of our common stock affords any cumulative voting rights. This means that the holders of a majority of the
voting power of the shares voting for the election of directors can elect all directors to be elected if they choose to do so.


 


Holders
of our common stock will be entitled to dividends in such amounts and at such times as our Board of Directors in its discretion may declare
out of funds legally available for the payment of dividends. We currently intend to retain our entire available discretionary cash flow
to finance the growth, development and expansion of our business and do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on the common stock in
the foreseeable future. Any future dividends will be paid at the discretion of our Board of Directors.