alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Charles V. Look *versus*Inhabitants of Industry.

If one, under duress, pays a tax wrongfully assessed on him, and the money goes into the treasury of the town, he may recover the amount, in an action against the town, without first making a special demand therefor.

Exceptions from tire ruling at *Nisi Prius*of Appleton, J.

This was an action of assumpsit to recover the amount of a tax assessed on the plaintiff by the assessors of Industry for the year 1858.

It was admitted that the plaintiff paid the tax after arrest and commitment by the collector, and that the amount was paid into the town treasury; that the tax was legally assessed, if the plaintiff was. an inhabitant of the town of Industry on the first day of April, 1858. There was no proof of any demand on the defendants.

The counsel for the defendants requested the Court to instruct the jury, if they should find that the plaintiff was not an inhabitant of Industry on the first day of April, 1858, this action could not be maintained; which instruction the Court declined to give, but instructed them, if they should find the plaintiff was not an inhabitant of Industry on the -first day of April, 1858, their verdict should be for the plaintiff. The jury found specially that the plaintiff was not an inhabitant of Industry on the first day of April, 1858, and their verdict was for the plaintiff.

The defendants excepted.

*Ooodenow,*in support of the exceptions, contended: —

1. That if the plaintiff was not an inhabitant of the town, the assessors were not authorized to tax him; that, for so doing, they personally were liable, and not the town.

*376
      *2.*That, without special demand before suit, the plaintiff could not maintain his action.

*S. Belcher, contra.*

The opinion of the Court was drawn up by

Rice, J.

The case finds that the plaintiff was not an inhabitant of Industry on the first day of April, 1858, and therefore was not liable to be assessed as such for that year. It also finds that the tax was paid under duress, and the money has gone into the treasury of the defendants. Under such circumstances, upon common principles, the corporation having received the money of the plaintiff, to which they have no right, and placed it in their treasury, are liable to refund it in • this action. *Sumner*v. *First Parish in Dorchester,*4 Pick., 461; *Thorndike*v. *Boston,*1 Met., 242; *Briggs*v. *Lewiston,*29 Maine, 472. We find no authority for requiring a special demand before commencing the action. *Exceptions overruled, and*

*Judgment on the verdict.*

Appleton, G-oodenow, Davis and Walton, JJ., concurred.
No. 65699.

#### Louis Schneider Corp. *v.*United States,

protest 58/897 (New York).

*503Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of artificial stems and following *United States*v. *Steinberg Bros.*(47 C.C.P.A. 47, C.A.D. 727), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
WR-81,360-01

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

Transmitted 5/29/2015 12:33:49 PM

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALSOF TEXAS Accepted 5/29/2015 1:12:21 PM > ABEL ACOSTA

•Jf" CLERK

EX PARTE

DERRICK KEITH COOKE

§

§

§

§

§

NO. WR-81, 360-01 FILED IN

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

May 29, 2015

ABELACOSTA, CLERK

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE APPLICANT'S BRIEF

TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT:

Comes now Derrick Keith Cooke, Appellant, and files this motion for an extension until

May 29, 2015, to file his Brief. In Support thereof, Applicant would show as follows:

I.

The deadline for filing Appellant's Brief was May 26, 2015. This is Applicant's first

request for an extension oftime.

III.

Appellant's request for an extension is based on the following facts: Counsel for

Applicant Cooke was in an aggravated sexual assault trial in the 213th District Court ofTarrant

County, Texas from May 15 through May 22, 2015. In addition Counsel fro Applicant Cooke

had a flood in his office on May 24, 2015, and was unable to complete Applicant's Brief. As a

result, counsel is requesting an extension until May 29, 2015, to adequately discharge his duty to

his client.
Respectfully submitted,

Stickels & Associates, P.C.

John W. Stickels

P.O. Box 121431

Arlington, Texas 76012

Phone:(817)479-9282

Fax:(817)622-8071 •

BY: /S/ John W. Stickels

John W. Stickels

State Bar No. 19225300

Attorney for Derrick Keith Cooke

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on the 29th day of May, 2015, a true and correct copy ofthe above

and foregoing Motion has been served on the Assistant Criminal District Attorney at 401 W.

Belknap, Fort Worth, Texas 76196.

/S/ John W. Stickels

John W. Stickels

CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE

I hereby certify that on the 29th day of May, 2015, a conference was held between my

office and a representative for the Tarrant County District Attorney's Office, and she stated that

she is not opposed to the granting of Appellant's Motion for Extension ofTime.

/S/ John W. Stickels

John W. Stickels
# C_2008223EN.01005702.xml

| 30.8.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 223/57 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.8.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 223/57

---

Action brought on 11 July 2008 — Italy v Commission

(Case T-275/08)

(2008/C 223/101)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Italian Republic (represented by: S. Fiorentino, avvocato dello Stato)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | annul Commission Decision C (2008) 1709 final of 30 April 2008 on the clearance of the accounts of certain paying agencies of Germany, Italy and Slovakia concerning expenditure financed by the Guarantee Section of the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF) in respect of the 2006 financial year, in so far as it charges interest on sums to be borne by the Italian State pursuant to Article 32(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1290/05 and, in particular, in so far as it accounts for interest, with effect from the date of payment of sums that are not due, on sums which have not been recovered within eight years of the date of the primary administrative or judicial procedure and where judicial proceedings are pending before the national courts or tribunals, 50 % of which is to be borne by the Member State and 50 % by the Community budget. |
| --- | --- |

—

annul Commission Decision C (2008) 1709 final of 30 April 2008 on the clearance of the accounts of certain paying agencies of Germany, Italy and Slovakia concerning expenditure financed by the Guarantee Section of the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF) in respect of the 2006 financial year, in so far as it charges interest on sums to be borne by the Italian State pursuant to Article 32(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1290/05 and, in particular, in so far as it accounts for interest, with effect from the date of payment of sums that are not due, on sums which have not been recovered within eight years of the date of the primary administrative or judicial procedure and where judicial proceedings are pending before the national courts or tribunals, 50 % of which is to be borne by the Member State and 50 % by the Community budget.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments are similar to those relied on in Case T-274/08 Italian Republic v Commission.

Italian Republic

Commission

---
Loan Agreement and Note Payable dated January 27, 2022


 

LOAN AGREEMENT

January 27, 2022

 

Richard N. Jeffs (the “Lender”) of 11750 Fairtide Road, Ladysmith, BC V9G 1K5, advanced USD$25,000 (the “Principal Sum”) to Cell MedX (Canada) Corp. (the “Borrower”) of 820 - 1130 Pender Street West. Vancouver, BC V6E 4A4. The Lender advanced the funds on January 27, 2022. As per request of the Borrower, the Lender transferred the Principal Sum into the account of Cell MedX Corp., the Borrower’s parent corporation with an address at 123 W. Nye Ln, Suite 446, Carson City, NV 89706.

 

The Borrower agrees to repay the Principal Sum on demand, together with interest calculated and compounded monthly at the rate of 6% per year (the “Interest”) calculated from January 27, 2022 (the “Effective Date”). The Borrower is liable for repayment of the Principal Sum, accrued Interest, and any additional costs that the Lender incurs in trying to collect the amount owed to him under the terms of this Loan Agreement.

 

The Borrower will evidence the debt and its repayment of the Principal Sum and the Interest with a promissory note in the attached form.

 

	LENDER

	BORROWER


	Richard N. Jeffs

	Cell MedX (Canada) Corp.


	 

	 


	Per:

	Per:


	 

	 


	 

	 


	/s/ Richard N. Jeffs

	/s/  Yanika Silina


	Richard N. Jeffs

	Yanika Silina, Director




 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  




 

 

PROMISSORY NOTE

 

	Principal Amount: USD$25,000

	January 27, 2022




 

 

FOR VALUE RECEIVED Cell MedX (Canada) Corp., (the “Borrower”) promises to pay on demand to the order of Richard N. Jeffs (the “Lender”) the sum of $25,000 lawful money of the United States of America (the “Principal Sum”) together with the Interest accrued on the Principal Sum calculated from January 27, 2022 (“Effective Date”) both before and after maturity, default and judgment at the Interest Rate as defined below.

 

For the purposes of this promissory note, Interest Rate means 6 per cent per year. Interest at the Interest Rate must be calculated and compounded monthly not in advance from and including the Effective Date (for an effective rate of 6.2% per annum calculated monthly), and is payable together with the Principal Sum when the Principal Sum is repaid.

 

The Borrower acknowledges that, at the Borrower’s request, the Lender transferred the Principal Sum to Cell MedX Corp., the Borrower’s parent corporation.

 

The Borrower may repay the Principal Sum, and the Interest in whole or in part at any time.

 

The Borrower waives presentment, protest, notice of protest and notice of dishonor of this promissory note.

 

 

BORROWER

Cell MedX (Canada) Corp.

 

Per:

 

 

/s/ Yanika Silina

Yanika Silina, Director
# L_2008285EN.01S00301.xml

| 29.10.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 285/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.10.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 285/s3

---

NOTE TO THE READER

The institutions have decided no longer to quote in their texts the last amendment to cited acts.

Unless otherwise indicated, references to acts in the texts published here are to the version of those acts currently in force.

---
In The 

Court of Appeals 

Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo 

 

No. 07-24-00106-CR 

 

STAAR MONIQUE DOMINGUEZ, APPELLANT 

V. 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE 

On Appeal from the 69th District Court 

Moore County, Texas 

Trial Court No. 6072, Honorable Kimberly Allen, Presiding 

September 17, 2024 

ORDER OF ABATEMENT AND REMAND 

Before PARKER and DOSS and YARBROUGH, JJ. 

Appellant, Staar Monique Dominguez, appeals from the trial court’s judgment 

revoking her community supervision for the offense of possession of a controlled 

substance1 and sentencing her to twenty-four months of confinement in a state jail facility. 

Appellant’s brief was originally due May 23, 2024, but we granted Appellant’s counsel 

three extensions to file a brief. By letter of August 2, 2024, we admonished counsel that 

1 See TEX. HEALTH & SAFETY CODE ANN. § 481.115(b).
2

no further extensions would be granted and that failure to file a brief by August 23 would 

result in the appeal being abated and the cause remanded to the trial court for further 

proceedings without further notice. To date, Appellant’s counsel has not filed a brief or 

had any further communication with this Court.

Accordingly, we abate this appeal and remand the cause to the trial court for further 

proceedings. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b)(2), (3). Upon remand, the trial court shall 

determine the following:

(1) whether Appellant still desires to prosecute the appeal;

(2) whether Appellant is indigent;

(3) if Appellant is not indigent, whether Appellant has made the necessary 

arrangements for filing a brief;

(4) why a timely appellate brief has not been filed on Appellant’s behalf;

(5) whether Appellant’s counsel has abandoned the appeal;

(6) whether Appellant has been denied the effective assistance of counsel;

(7) whether new counsel should be appointed; and

(8) if Appellant desires to continue the appeal, the date the Court may expect 

Appellant’s brief to be filed.

The trial court is directed to enter such orders necessary to address the 

aforementioned questions. So too shall it include its findings on those matters in a 

supplemental record and cause that record to be filed with this Court by October 17, 2024. 

If it is determined that Appellant desires to proceed with the appeal, is indigent, and has 

been denied the effective assistance of counsel, the trial court may appoint her new 
3

counsel; the name, address, email address, telephone number, and state bar number of 

any newly appointed counsel shall be included in the aforementioned findings.

Should Appellant’s counsel file a brief on or before October 8, 2024, she is directed 

to immediately notify the trial court of the filing, in writing, whereupon the trial court shall 

not be required to take any further action.

It is so ordered.

Per Curiam

Do not publish.
|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:        May 6, 2011       |   | /s/ WILLIAM L. JASPER                        |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                                                            |   | William L. Jasper                                 |   |
|                                                                                            |   | Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer |   |
# C_2018427EN.01010201.xml

| 26.11.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 427/102 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.11.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 427/102

---

Action brought on 8 October 2018 — Wewi Mobile v EUIPO (Fi Network)

(Case T-601/18)

(2018/C 427/134)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Wewi Mobile, SL (Villena, Spain) (represented by: J. C. Erdozain López, L. Montoya Terán and J. Galán López, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark Fi Network — Application for registration No 16 026 601

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 12 July 2018 in Case R 1462/2017-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision, save for the granting of the trade mark in respect of ‘magnets, magnetizers, demagnetizers’; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision, save for the granting of the trade mark in respect of ‘magnets, magnetizers, demagnetizers’;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Plea in law

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
# Official Journal L 305/2017

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 305 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6021 November 2017 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 305

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6021 November 2017

---

| Contents | | I   Legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Regulation (EU) 2017/2101 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 November 2017 amending Regulation (EC) No 1920/2006 as regards information exchange on, and an early warning system and risk assessment procedure for, new psychoactive substances | 1 |
| | | DIRECTIVES |
| | * | Directive (EU) 2017/2102 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 November 2017 amending Directive 2011/65/EU on the restriction of the use of certain hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment (
  1
  ) | 8 |
| | * | Directive (EU) 2017/2103 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 November 2017 amending Council Framework Decision 2004/757/JHA in order to include new psychoactive substances in the definition of ‘drug’ and repealing Council Decision 2005/387/JHA | 12 |

Contents

I   Legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Regulation (EU) 2017/2101 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 November 2017 amending Regulation (EC) No 1920/2006 as regards information exchange on, and an early warning system and risk assessment procedure for, new psychoactive substances

1

DIRECTIVES

*

Directive (EU) 2017/2102 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 November 2017 amending Directive 2011/65/EU on the restriction of the use of certain hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment (
  1
  )

1

8

*

Directive (EU) 2017/2103 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 November 2017 amending Council Framework Decision 2004/757/JHA in order to include new psychoactive substances in the definition of ‘drug’ and repealing Council Decision 2005/387/JHA

12

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
David R. Spivey Request for Part 333 Exemption

Exhibit 2 – Q500 Typhoon UA Specifications
Case: 2:12-cv-00525-EAS-TPK Doc #: 20 Filed: 02/25/14 Page: 1 of 15  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00525-EAS-TPK Doc #: 20 Filed: 02/25/14 Page: 2 of 15  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00525-EAS-TPK Doc #: 20 Filed: 02/25/14 Page: 3 of 15  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00525-EAS-TPK Doc #: 20 Filed: 02/25/14 Page: 4 of 15  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00525-EAS-TPK Doc #: 20 Filed: 02/25/14 Page: 5 of 15  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00525-EAS-TPK Doc #: 20 Filed: 02/25/14 Page: 6 of 15  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00525-EAS-TPK Doc #: 20 Filed: 02/25/14 Page: 7 of 15  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00525-EAS-TPK Doc #: 20 Filed: 02/25/14 Page: 8 of 15  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00525-EAS-TPK Doc #: 20 Filed: 02/25/14 Page: 9 of 15  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00525-EAS-TPK Doc #: 20 Filed: 02/25/14 Page: 10 of 15  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00525-EAS-TPK Doc #: 20 Filed: 02/25/14 Page: 11 of 15  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00525-EAS-TPK Doc #: 20 Filed: 02/25/14 Page: 12 of 15  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00525-EAS-TPK Doc #: 20 Filed: 02/25/14 Page: 13 of 15  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00525-EAS-TPK Doc #: 20 Filed: 02/25/14 Page: 14 of 15  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00525-EAS-TPK Doc #: 20 Filed: 02/25/14 Page: 15 of 15  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-08T18:58:19-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
# Official Journal L 215/2023

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 215 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6631 August 2023 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 215

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6631 August 2023

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/1667 of 8 August 2023 laying down rules for the application of Directive 2014/90/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council, as regards design, construction and performance requirements and testing standards for marine equipment and repealing Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/1157 (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/1667 of 8 August 2023 laying down rules for the application of Directive 2014/90/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council, as regards design, construction and performance requirements and testing standards for marine equipment and repealing Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/1157 (
  1
  )

1

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Order Entered October 5,, 2016 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-16-01095-CV 

IN RE: CC FORBES, LLC, FORBES ENERGY SERVICES, LTD, FORBES ENERGY 

SERVICES DELAWARE, LLC, AND TX ENERGY SERVICES, LLC, Relators 

Original Proceeding from the 191st Judicial District Court 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. DC-14-12627 

ORDER 

Before Justices Bridges, Myers, and Whitehill 

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS this original proceeding. 

Relators shall bear the costs of this original proceeding, if any. 

 

/s/ BILL WHITEHILL 

 JUSTICE