alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(Reap. Dec. 9272)

#### Plywood & Door Manufacturers Corporation *v.*United States

Entry No. 703377, etc.

(Decided December 18, 1958)

*James Wilson Young*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Mollison, Judge:

Counsel for the parties have stipulated and agreed in these cases as follows :

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the respective parties hereto that the merchandise involved in the appeals for reappraisement enumerated in Schedule “A”, attached hereto and made part hereof, consists of plywood exported from Finland in the years 1955 and 1956 and that the merchandise is properly valued on the basis of foreign value as defined in Section 402 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the value or the price at the time of exportation of such merchandise to the United States at which such or similiar [sic] merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade for home consumption including cost of containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise ready for shipment to the United States was, the appraised unit values, less 4% net packed.

Upon the agreed facts, I find that foreign value, as defined in section 402 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, is the proper basis of valuation for the merchandise involved in the appeals for reappraisement enumerated in schedule “A,” attached to this decision, and that such value in each case was the appraised value, less 4 per centum, net, packed.

Judgment will issue accordingly.
§ ̈¦

§ ̈¦

§ ̈¦ ¡s

§ ̈¦

¡s 

§ ̈¦ § ̈¦

¡s

§ ̈¦

¡s

¡s

§ ̈¦

¡s

¡s

¡s

§ ̈¦ ¡s

§ ̈¦

")

§ ̈¦

§ ̈¦ § ̈¦

§ ̈¦ ¡s

")

§ ̈¦

§ ̈¦

§ ̈¦

§ ̈¦

¡s

¡s

ST.

CHARLES

ST.

LOUIS

ST.

LOUIS CITY

JEFFERSON

Joliet

Moline

Morris

Peru Wilmington

Kankakee

Dwight

Galesburg

Pontiac

Peoria

Bloomington

Normal

Lincoln Champaign

Decatur

Springfield

Taylorville Mattoon

Carlinville

Litchfield

Effingham

Vandalia

Alton

Centralia

WILL

LASALLE

BUREAU

HENRY

GRUNDY

MERCER PUTNAM

MCLEAN TAZEWELL FULTON

CHAMPAIGN

LOGAN

PIATT

STARK

KNOX

MARSHALL

LIVINGSTON

WARREN IROQUO

PEORIA WOODFORD

COO

ROCK

ISLAND

KENDALL

KANKAK

FORD

MENARD

MASON

DEWITT SCHUYLER

BROWN

DOUGLAS

CASS

CUMBERLAND

CALHOUN

CLAY

JERSEY EFFINGHAM

GREENE

CLINTON

EDWARDS WAB

WASHINGTON

RICHLAND

MCDONOUGH

VERM

MACON

SANGAMON

ED

MORGAN

CHRISTIAN

MOULTRIE

SCOTT

COLES

SHELBY

MACOUPIN MONTGOMERY

CLA

CRA

JASPER

BOND

MADISON

FAYETTE

ST.

CLAIR WAYNE

MONROE JEFFERSON

LA

MARION

108

267

45

52

51 24

45

51

136

58

36

50

52

34

57

55

80

355

39 55

74

57

72

55

55

70 270

64

70

57

80

Springfield

Springfield

Leland Grove

Jerome

Grandview

Southern View

 Tier 1 Preferred Alternative Sections between Chicago and St.
Request for Public Comments on Exception al Events in the Greater Phoenix Area

In 2005, Congress identified a need to account fo r events that result in exceedances of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) that are exceptional in nature (e.g., not expected to reoccur or caused by acts of nature beyond man-made controls.) In response, EPA promulgated the Exceptional Events Rule (EER) to address exceptional events in 40 CFR Parts 50 and 51 on March 22, 2007 (72 FR 13560). On May 2, 2011, EPA released draft guidance documents on the implementation of the EER to Stat e, tribal and local air agencies for review. The EER allows for states and tribes to “flag” air quality monitoring data as an exceptional event. If flagged, these data can be excluded from consideration in air quality planning if EPA concurs with the demonstration submitted by the flagging agency documenting that all procedural and technical re quirements have been met.

Pursuant to 40 CFR 50.14(c)(3)(i) , the Arizona Department of E nvironmental Quality (ADEQ) is soliciting comments on its final demonstrations of events that have caused elevated

concentrations of PM 10 in the Greater Phoenix area on September 11 & 12, 2011 and June 16; June 27; July 11; August 11; August 14; and Se ptember 6, 2012. ADEQ has decided to flag these episodes based on these analyses. Copies of the demonstrations are available for review beginning Monday, January 14, 2013, on the ADEQ website at www.azdeq.gov/environ/air/plan/ . Interested parties can subm it written comments throughout the comment period which will end at 5:00 p.m. on Tuesday, February 12, 2013. Any comments received will be responded to and forwar ded to EPA with the final demonstrations.

Written comments should be addressed, faxed, or e-mailed to: Andra Juniel, Air Assessment Section, Arizona Department of Environmental Quality, 1110 W. Washington Street, 3415-A, Phoenix, AZ 85007, PHONE: (602) 771-4417; FAX: (602) 771- 2366, E-mail: juniel.andra@azdeq.gov.

In addition to being available on-line, copies of the analyses are available for review, Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., at the ADEQ Records Management Center, 1110 W. Washington St., Phoenix, AZ, 85007, Attn: Records Center, (602) 771-4380, email: recordscenter@azdeq.gov.

Persons with a disability may request reasonabl e accommodations by contacting Linda Morrison at (602) 771-4793 or 1-800-234-5677 ext. 771-4793. Th is document is available in alternative formats by contacting ADEQ TDD phone number at (602) 771-4829.
Technical Memo No. 5 Noise and Vibration for the AAF Passenger Rail Project from Orlando to Miami, Florida 

AMEC Project No. 6063120212 July 2013 

5-77 

Figure 5-55. VMF Station Inventory of Noise and Vibration Impacts
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In Connection with the Quarterly Report of Tower Properties Company (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Stanley J. Weber, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
            15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

/s/ Stanley J. Weber
------------------------------------
Stanley J. Weber
Chief Financial Officer
November 12, 2004
### ,, SERVED: JULY 9,'2014 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC
IN THEMATTER OF PROTHERAGEN, INC. D/B/A ALFA CHEMISTRY COMPANY DOCKETNO. FAA-2014-0406 (Civil Penalty Action)
NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING 

### ZJI4 JUL 10 p 

### 1=4b

Thisproceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2013NE700150) has been assigned

. . to Administrative Law !udgeJ.E. Sullivan. All future pleadings and other communications regarding this proceeding shall be served on the Judge, the FAA Hearing Docket, and the other persons on the attached Service List.

Attachment

- Service ListSERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL ORIGINAL & ONE COPY Federal AviationAdministration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite2Wl000 1

· President, Respondent

Protheragen, Inc. d/b/a Alfa Chemistry 1360 Stony Brook Road Stony Brook, NY 11790 TEL: 201-478-8534 FAX: 516-927-0118 ONE COPY

R. Bennett Sargent, Complainant's Counsel Office ofthe Regional Counsel Federal Aviation Administration 12 New England Executive Park Burlington, MA 01803 TEL: 781-238-7058 FAX: 781-238-7055 Hon. J.E. Sullivan,AdministrativeLawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-6941 FAX: 202-366-7536 DocketNo. FAA-2014-0406 (Civil PenaltyAction)

1Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2WIOOO, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

### -2-
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

EASTERN DIVISION 

SHRONNA THOMAS Case No. 2:13-cv-0061 

 JUDGE GREGORY L. FROST 

 Plaintiff, Magistrate Judge Elizabeth P. Deavers 

v. 

 

JP MORGAN CHASE, 

 Defendant. 

ORDER

Before the Court is Plaintiff Shronna Thomas’s “Notice of Dismissal With Prejudice,” 

purporting to voluntarily dismiss this action. (ECF No. 21.) Because Defendant has filed an 

answer, however, Plaintiff may not dismiss this action by way of notice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 

41(a)(1)(A)(i). Plaintiff may only obtain voluntary dismissal by way of a stipulation or by court 

order. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) and 41(B). Because Plaintiff’s filing is not a stipulation (it 

is not signed by all parties), the Court construes Plaintiff’s filing as a motion for voluntary 

dismissal with prejudice. 

For good cause shown, the Court hereby DISMISSES this action with prejudice. 

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 /s/ Gregory L. Frost 

 GREGORY L. FROST 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case: 2:13-cv-00061-GLF-EPD Doc #: 22 Filed: 12/16/13 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Before the Second Division,

February 27, 1943

No. 48061.

#### Protests 38065-K, etc., of A. D. Cohen Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of *United States*v. *Armand Schwab*(30 C. C. P. A. 72, C. A. D. 218) the protests were sustained.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOUND ON
PAGES 1 AND 2 OF THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-QSB FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30
2000, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           9,044
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,619
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                16,452
<PP&E>                                          37,948
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,013
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  52,664
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,478
<BONDS>                                         10,848
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           483
<OTHER-SE>                                      38,578
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    52,664
<SALES>                                          7,746
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 7,746
<CGS>                                            3,777
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,234
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (4,071)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,350
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,233
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,913
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,538
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,538
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE>                                                             5
<MULTIPLIER>                                                  1,000,000
       
<S>                                                              <C>    
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                     3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                           DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                              JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                                MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                                               35
<SECURITIES>                                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                         0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                      0
<PP&E>                                                            3,003
<DEPRECIATION>                                                    1,154
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                    9,032
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                 0
<BONDS>                                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                                           0
<COMMON>                                                             15
<OTHER-SE>                                                        1,351
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                      9,032
<SALES>                                                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                    372
<CGS>                                                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                        68
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                      0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                     14
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                   94
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                      42
<INCOME-TAX>                                                         14
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                  28
<DISCONTINUED>                                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                       0
<CHANGES>                                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                                         28
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                         0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                         0
        


</TABLE>
(Reap. Dec. 9348)

#### M. Grumbacher, Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 760532.

(Decided March 17, 1959)

*John J. Verdón*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Lawrence, Judge:

There was no appearance on behalf of plaintiff when the above-enumerated appeal for a reappraisement was called for hearing. The court thereupon ordered the case submitted.

It is provided by the rules of the court that in such an instance, after the opposite party has had an opportunity to present evidence on the issues, the case may be decided by the court on the record before it.

Accordingly, I have examined the record in the present appeal for a reappraisement and find nothing therein which tends in any way to overcome the presumption of correctness which attaches to the decision of the appraiser. I find and hold, therefore, that the proper value of the merchandise is the value returned by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
No. 54857.

#### Franco Belgium Trading Corp. *v.*United States,

protest 161271-K (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400

the court dismissed the protest.
DODGE 

MAYOR'S OFFrCE | Matt Bemrich, Mayor | David R. Flerke, City Manager 

hooXA ^>OT-a^-too\-i^i^if^2^ 

February 8,2010 

Dennis J. DeVany 

EAS & Domestic Analysis Division 

Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

RE: DELTA AIRLINES PROPOSAL FOR EAS CONTRACT CHANGE 

DIRECT FLIGHTS FROM FOD TO MSP 

Dear Mr. DeVany: 

CTJ 

As Mayor, I am pleased to convey that our City Council and City Administration endorses the recent proposal' 

by Delta Airlines to provide our region with two daily direct round trip flights connecting to Minneapolis-St. 

Paul Airport. These flights are proposed to be seven days per week. 

Since this proposed change necessitates a revision within the Essential Air Service (EAS) contract, we 

encourage you to support this service enhancement for the regional area served by Fort Dodge. 

The transition from NWA to Delta has been seamless and the service levels have been well received. The EAS 

is a vital component of our region's economic and transportation model and we encourage your continued 

support. We strongly support the Fort Dodge Airport and the service provided by Delta Airlines. They are 

important to our viability and are important elements of our community plans. 

Thank you for the opportunity to comment on these changes to our flights schedule proposed by Delta Airlines. 

Respectfiilly, 

Mayor Matt Bemrich 

Municipal Building | 819 1st Avenue South | Fort Dodge, lA 50501 | Phone: 515.573,7144 | Fax: 515.573.5751 | Email: mayorofdodge@fortdodgeiowa.org
**Important legal notice**

*|*

# 52006AP0534

**European Parliament legislative resolution on the Council common position for adopting a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a programme of Community action in the field of consumer policy (2007-2013) (13241/1/2006 - C6-0420/2006 - 2005/0042B(COD))***Official Journal 317 E , 23/12/2006 P. 0061 - 0061*

20061223

P6_TA(2006)0534

Community action programme in the field of consumer policy (2007-2013) ***II

European Parliament legislative resolution on the Council common position for adopting a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a programme of Community action in the field of consumer policy (2007-2013) (13241/1/2006 — C6-0420/2006 — 2005/0042B(COD))

(Codecision procedure: second reading)

The European Parliament,

- having regard to the Council common position (13241/1/2006 — C6-0420/2006),

- having regard to its position at first reading [1] on the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council (COM(2005)0115) [2],

- having regard to the amended Commission proposal (COM(2006)0235) [3],

- having regard to Article 251(2) of the EC Treaty,

- having regard to Rule 67 of its Rules of Procedure,

- having regard to the recommendation for second reading of the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection (A6-0408/2006);

1. Approves the common position;

2. Notes that the act is adopted in accordance with the common position;

3. Instructs its President to sign the act with the President of the Council pursuant to Article 254(1) of the EC Treaty;

4. Instructs its Secretary-General to sign the act, once it has been verified that all the procedures have been duly completed, and, in agreement with the Secretary-General of the Council, to have it published in the Official Journal of the European Union;

5. Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission.

[1] Texts Adopted, 23.3.2006, P6_TA(2006)0107.

[2] Not yet published in OJ.

[3] Not yet published in OJ.

--------------------------------------------------
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to**

**Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

 

I, Frederick M. Strader, asPresident and Chief Executive Officer of United Industrial Corporation (the “Company”),certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

 

a.               theaccompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period endedSeptember 30, 2005 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission(the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

b.              theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Date: November 8, 2005

 

 
| /s/  Frederick M. Strader |   |
|---------------------------|--------|
| Frederick M.  Strader     |
| Chief  Executive Officer  |

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 77 (Monday, April 23, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 20142]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-7599]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Astronomy and Astrophysics Advisory Committee <greek-i>13883; 
Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following Astronomy and Astrophysics Advisory Committee 
(<greek-i>13883) meeting:

    Date And Time: May 10-11, 2007, 8:30 a.m.-5 p.m.
    Place: National Science Foundation, Room 1235, Stafford I 
Building, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA, 22230.
    Type of Meeting: Open.
    Contact Person: Dr. G. Wayne Van Citters, Director, Division of 
Astronomical Sciences, Suite 1045, National Science Foundation, 4201 
Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230. Telephone: 703-292-4908. 
Additional information is available at http://www.nsf.gov/mps/ast/aaac.jsp.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations to the 
National Science Foundation (NSF), the National Aeronautics and 
Space Administration (NASA) and the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) 
on issues within the field of astronomy and astrophysics that are of 
mutual interest and concern to the agencies.
    Agenda: To hear presentations of current programming by 
representatives from NSF, NASA, DOE and other agencies relevant to 
astronomy and astrophysics; to discuss current and potential areas 
of cooperation between the agencies; to formulate recommendations 
for continued and new areas of cooperation and mechanisms for 
achieving them.

    Dated: April 17, 2007.
Susanne E. Bolton,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. E7-7599 Filed 4-20-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
Before the Third Division,

June 16, 1955

No. 59158.

protests 227426-K, etc. (New York).

#### M & R Dietetic Laboratories, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of canned meat with vegetables the same in all material respects as that the subject of *United States*v. *The Crosse & Blackwell Co.*(42 C. C. P. A. 99, C. A. D. 579), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.