Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 236 / Wednesday, December 9, 2015 / Proposed Rules 76403 

for practices, methods, and procedures 

the Administrator finds necessary for 

safety in air commerce. This regulation 

is within the scope of that authority 

because it addresses an unsafe condition 

that is likely to exist or develop on 

products identified in this rulemaking 

action. 

Regulatory Findings 

We determined that this proposed AD 

would not have federalism implications 

under Executive Order 13132. This 

proposed AD would not have a 

substantial direct effect on the States, on 

the relationship between the national 

Government and the States, or on the 

distribution of power and 

responsibilities among the various 

levels of government. 

For the reasons discussed above, I 

certify this proposed regulation: 

(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ under Executive Order 12866, 

(2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under 

the DOT Regulatory Policies and 

Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 

1979), 

(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation 

in Alaska to the extent that it justifies 

making a regulatory distinction, and 

(4) Will not have a significant 

economic impact, positive or negative, 

on a substantial number of small entities 

under the criteria of the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act. 

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 

Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation 

safety, Incorporation by reference, 

Safety. 

The Proposed Amendment 

Accordingly, under the authority 

delegated to me by the Administrator, 

the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 

39 as follows: 

PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS 

DIRECTIVES 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 39 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. 

§ 39.13 [Amended] 

■ 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding 

the following new airworthiness 

directive (AD): 

Rolls-Royce plc: Docket No. FAA–2015– 

4076; Directorate Identifier 2015–NE– 

30–AD. 

(a) Comments Due Date 

We must receive comments by February 8, 

2016. 

(b) Affected ADs 

None. 

(c) Applicability 

This AD applies to Rolls-Royce plc RB211– 

22B–02, RB211–22B (MOD 72–8700), RB211– 

524B–02, RB211–524B–B–02, RB211–524B2– 

19, RB211–524B2–B–19, RB211–524B3–02, 

RB211–524B4–02, RB211–524B4–D–02, 

RB211–524C2–19, RB211–524C2–B–19, 

RB211–524D4–19, RB211–524D4–B–19, 

RB211–524D4X–19, RB211–524D4X–B–19, 

RB211–524D4–39, RB211–524D4–B–39, 

RB211–524G2–19, RB211–524G3–19, 

RB211–524–G2–T–19, RB211–524G3–T–19, 

RB211–524H–36, RB211–524H2–19, RB211– 

524H–T–36, and RB211–524H2–T–19 

turbofan engines, all serial numbers, with 

low-pressure turbine (LPT) support roller 

bearing, part number (P/N) LK30313 or P/N 

UL29651, installed. 

(d) Reason 

This AD was prompted by a report of a 

breach of the turbine casing and release of 

engine debris through a hole in the engine 

nacelle. We are issuing this AD to prevent 

failure of the LPT support roller bearing, loss 

of radial position following LPT blade 

failure, uncontained part release, damage to 

the engine, and damage to the airplane. 

(e) Actions and Compliance 

Comply with this AD within the 

compliance times specified, unless already 

done. At the next shop visit or within 24 

months after the effective date of this AD, 

whichever occurs first, remove from service 

LPT support roller bearing, P/N LK30313 or 

P/N UL29651, and replace with a part 

eligible for installation. 

(f) Installation Prohibition 

After the effective date of this AD, do not 

install an LPT support roller bearing, P/N 

LK30313 or P/N UL29651, onto any engine. 

(g) Definition 

For the purpose of this AD, a ‘‘shop visit’’ 

is defined as induction of an engine into the 

shop for maintenance involving the 

separation of pairs of major mating engine 

flanges, except that the separation of engine 

flanges solely for the purposes of 

transportation without subsequent engine 

maintenance does not constitute an engine 

shop visit. 

(h) Alternative Methods of Compliance 

(AMOCs) 

The Manager, Engine Certification Office, 

FAA, may approve AMOCs for this AD. Use 

the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19 to 

make your request. You may email your 

request to: ANE-AD-AMOC@faa.gov. 

(i) Related Information 

(1) For more information about this AD, 

contact Brian Kierstead, Aerospace Engineer, 

Engine Certification Office, FAA, Engine & 

Propeller Directorate, 12 New England 

Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803; 

phone: 781–238–7772; fax: 781–238–7199; 

email: brian.kierstead@faa.gov. 

(2) Refer to MCAI European Aviation 

Safety Agency AD 2015–0187, dated 

September 9, 2015, for more information. 

You may examine the MCAI in the AD 

docket on the Internet at http://

www.regulations.gov by searching for and 

locating it in Docket No. FAA–2015–4076. 

Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on 

December 2, 2015. 

Colleen M. D’Alessandro, 

Directorate Manager, Engine & Propeller 

Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. 2015–30947 Filed 12–8–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R05–OAR–2014–0362; FRL–9939–76– 

Region 5] 

Air Plan Approval; Ohio; Regional 

Haze Glatfelter BART SIP Revision 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) is proposing to extend the 

compliance date for the Best Available 

Retrofit Technology (BART) emission 

limits for sulfur dioxide (SO2) at the 

P.H. Glatfelter Company (Glatfelter) 

facility submitted as part of its State 

Implementation Plan (SIP) Revision on 

April 14, 2014. Specifically, EPA is 

proposing to extend the compliance 

date for the SO2 emission limits 

applicable to Boilers No. 7 and No. 8 at 

Glatfelter by 25 months, from December 

31, 2014, to January 31, 2017. We have 

reviewed this SIP revision and 

concluded that it meets the 

requirements of the Clean Air Act and 

the regional haze rule and because 

BART requirements continue to be met. 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before January 8, 2016. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R05– 

OAR–2014–0362, by one of the 

following methods: 

1. www.regulations.gov: Follow the 

on-line instructions for submitting 

comments. 

2. Email: aburano.douglas@epa.gov. 

3. Fax: (312) 408–2279. 

4. Mail: Douglas Aburano, Chief, 

Attainment Planning and Maintenance 

Section, Air Programs Branch (AR–18J), 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 

77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, 

Illinois 60604. 

5. Hand Delivery: Douglas Aburano, 

Chief, Attainment Planning and 

Maintenance Section, Air Programs 

Branch (AR–18J), U.S. Environmental 

Protection Agency, 77 West Jackson 

Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604. 

Such deliveries are only accepted 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS

76404 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 236 / Wednesday, December 9, 2015 / Proposed Rules 

during the Regional Office normal hours 

of operation, and special arrangements 

should be made for deliveries of boxed 

information. The Regional Office official 

hours of business are Monday through 

Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding 

Federal holidays. 

Instructions: Direct your comments to 

Docket ID No. EPA–R05–OAR–2014– 

0362. EPA’s policy is that all comments 

received will be included in the public 

docket without change and may be 

made available online at 

www.regulations.gov, including any 

personal information provided, unless 

the comment includes information 

claimed to be Confidential Business 

Information (CBI) or other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Do not submit information that you 

consider to be CBI or otherwise 

protected through www.regulations.gov 

or email. The www.regulations.gov Web 

site is an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, 

which means EPA will not know your 

identity or contact information unless 

you provide it in the body of your 

comment. If you send an email 

comment directly to EPA without going 

through www.regulations.gov your email 

address will be automatically captured 

and included as part of the comment 

that is placed in the public docket and 

made available on the Internet. If you 

submit an electronic comment, EPA 

recommends that you include your 

name and other contact information in 

the body of your comment and with any 

disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA 

cannot read your comment due to 

technical difficulties and cannot contact 

you for clarification, EPA may not be 

able to consider your comment. 

Electronic files should avoid the use of 

special characters, any form of 

encryption, and be free of any defects or 

viruses. 

Docket: All documents in the docket 

are listed in the www.regulations.gov 

index. Although listed in the index, 

some information is not publicly 

available, e.g., CBI or other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Certain other material, such as 

copyrighted material, will be publicly 

available only in hard copy. Publicly 

available docket materials are available 

either electronically in 

www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at 

the Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region 5, Air and Radiation Division, 77 

West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, 

Illinois 60604. This facility is open from 

8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through 

Friday, excluding Federal holidays. We 

recommend that you telephone Gilberto 

Alvarez, Environmental Scientist, at 

(312) 886–6143 before visiting the 

Region 5 office. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Gilberto Alvarez, Environmental 

Scientist, Attainment Planning and 

Maintenance Section, Air Programs 

Branch (AR–18J), Environmental 

Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West 

Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 

60604, (312) 886–6143, 

alvarez.gilberto@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Throughout this document whenever 

‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean 

EPA. This SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

section is arranged as follows: 

I. What is the background for this proposed 

action? 

II. What is EPA’s analysis of Ohio’s April 14, 

2014, SIP revision? 

III. Proposed Action 

IV. Incorporation by Reference 

V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews 

I. What is the background for this 

proposed action? 

On July 2, 2012, EPA approved Ohio’s 

Regional Haze SIP (77 FR 39177). Ohio’s 

Regional Haze SIP included the 

applicability of BART to the State’s only 

non-utility BART source, Glatfelter, in 

Chillicothe, Ohio. The BART 

requirement specified that two of the 

coal fired boilers at this facility, No. 7 

and No. 8, install control technology to 

limit the amount of SO2 emissions from 

the boilers. The compliance date for 

BART emission reductions was 

scheduled to be December 31, 2014. The 

compliance date was aligned with 

Glatfelter’s expected compliance date 

for the Industrial Boiler Maximum 

Achievable Control Technology (MACT) 

requirements finalized by EPA in May, 

2011 (76 FR 28862). 

On February 6, 2014, Ohio EPA 

received a request from Glatfelter to 

extend the original compliance date to 

January 31, 2017. The extension request 

is based on the litigation, revision and 

new compliance date associated with 

the Industrial Boiler MACT. Under EPA 

regulations (40 CFR 51.308(e)(1)(iv)), 

BART is to be implemented ‘‘as 

expeditiously as practicable, but in no 

event later than 5 years after approval of 

the implementation plan revision.’’ The 

required compliance date is July 2, 

2017. 

This rulemaking addresses an April 

14, 2014, submission supplemented on 

July 27, 2015, from the Ohio EPA to 

extend the compliance date from 

December 31, 2014, to January 31, 2017. 

One of the requests within the April 14, 

2014, SIP revision includes ‘‘the 

requirement that P.H. Glatfelter submit 

an application for modification of the 

federally enforceable permit (that will 

include a compliance date outlining, at 

a minimum, the specific, selected 

control technologies and methods of 

compliance) from December 31, 2013, to 

requiring the submittal provide for 

sufficient time for Ohio EPA to include 

these requirements, along with any 

appropriate monitoring, record keeping 

and reporting requirements, in the 

federally enforceable permit by no later 

than January 31, 2017.’’ 

Ohio EPA supplemented their original 

submittal on July 27, 2015, with a 

revised federally enforceable permit for 

Glatfelter that included the new 

compliance date. Ohio EPA made the 

federally enforceable permit available 

for public comment on June 6, 2015, 

and comments were accepted through 

July 7, 2015. The Ohio EPA consulted 

the Federal Land Managers and 

included them in the public comment 

process. Two comments were received 

and those comments, along with Ohio 

EPA’s responses were included in the 

July 27, 2015, submittal. 

II. What is EPA’s analysis of Ohio’s 

April 14, 2014, SIP revision? 

The CAA and the Regional Haze Rule 

require BART controls to be installed as 

expeditiously as practicable, but in no 

event later than five years after approval 

of the Regional Haze implementation 

plan revision. As discussed in greater 

detail in section I of this proposed 

rulemaking, our proposed extension of 

the compliance date by 25 months, from 

December 31, 2014, to January 31, 2017, 

is consistent with the CAA and the 

Regional Haze Rule. The extension is 

justified by an expeditious schedule for 

the installation of multiple control 

technologies to meet the Boiler MACT. 

III. Proposed Action 

EPA is proposing to approve a 

revision to the Ohio SIP submitted by 

the State of Ohio on April 14, 2014, 

supplemented on July 27, 2015, related 

to BART requirements for Glatfelter. 

Specifically, EPA is proposing to extend 

the compliance date for the SO2

emission limits applicable to Boilers No. 

7 and No. 8 at Glatfelter by 25 months 

from December 31, 2014, to January 31, 

2017. 

IV. Incorporation by Reference 

In this rule, EPA is proposing to 

include in a final EPA rule regulatory 

text that includes incorporation by 

reference. In accordance with 

requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, EPA is 

proposing to incorporate by reference 

Permit Number 0671010028—Final 

Division of Air Pollution Control Permit 

to Install for P.H. Glatfelter Company— 

Chillecothe facility, effective July 20, 

2015. EPA has made, and will continue 

to make, these documents generally 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS

Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 236 / Wednesday, December 9, 2015 / Proposed Rules 76405 

available electronically through 

www.regulations.gov and/or in hard 

copy at the appropriate EPA office (see 

the ADDRESSES section of this preamble 

for more information). 

V. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

Under the CAA, the Administrator is 

required to approve a SIP submission 

that complies with the provisions of the 

CAA and applicable Federal regulations. 

42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). 

Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, 

EPA’s role is to approve state choices, 

provided that they meet the criteria of 

the CAA. Accordingly, this action 

merely approves state law as meeting 

Federal requirements and does not 

impose additional requirements beyond 

those imposed by state law. For that 

reason, this action: 

• Is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to review by the Office of 

Management and Budget under 

Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, 

October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, 

January 21, 2011); 

• Does not impose an information 

collection burden under the provisions 

of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); 

• Is certified as not having a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 

U.S.C. 601 et seq.); 

• Does not contain any unfunded 

mandate or significantly or uniquely 

affect small governments, as described 

in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); 

• Does not have Federalism 

implications as specified in Executive 

Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 

1999); 

• Is not an economically significant 

regulatory action based on health or 

safety risks subject to Executive Order 

13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); 

• Is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 

28355, May 22, 2001); 

• Is not subject to requirements of 

Section 12(d) of the National 

Technology Transfer and Advancement 

Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because 

application of those requirements would 

be inconsistent with the CAA; and 

• Does not provide EPA with the 

discretionary authority to address, as 

appropriate, disproportionate human 

health or environmental effects, using 

practicable and legally permissible 

methods, under Executive Order 12898 

(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). 

In addition, the SIP is not approved 

to apply on any Indian reservation land 

or in any other area where EPA or an 

Indian tribe has demonstrated that a 

tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of 

Indian country, the rule does not have 

tribal implications and will not impose 

substantial direct costs on tribal 

governments or preempt tribal law as 

specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 

FR 67249, November 9, 2000). 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Incorporation by 

reference, Intergovernmental relations, 

Sulfur oxides. 

Dated: November 23, 2015. 

Susan Hedman, 

Regional Administrator, Region 5. 

[FR Doc. 2015–30917 Filed 12–8–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

National Oceanic and Atmospheric 

Administration 

50 CFR Part 679 

[Docket No. 150818742–5742–01] 

RIN 0648–XE130 

Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic 

Zone Off Alaska; Gulf of Alaska; 2016 

and 2017 Harvest Specifications for 

Groundfish 

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries 

Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 

Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), 

Commerce. 

ACTION: Proposed rule; request for 

comments. 

SUMMARY: NMFS proposes 2016 and 

2017 harvest specifications, 

apportionments, and Pacific halibut 

prohibited species catch limits for the 

groundfish fishery of the Gulf of Alaska 

(GOA). This action is necessary to 

establish harvest limits for groundfish 

during the 2016 and 2017 fishing years 

and to accomplish the goals and 

objectives of the Fishery Management 

Plan for Groundfish of the Gulf of 

Alaska. The intended effect of this 

action is to conserve and manage the 

groundfish resources in the GOA in 

accordance with the Magnuson-Stevens 

Fishery Conservation and Management 

Act. 

DATES: Comments must be received by 

January 8, 2016. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments 

on this document, identified by NOAA– 

NMFS–2015–0110, by any one of the 

following methods: 

• Electronic Submission: Submit all 

electronic public comments via the 

Federal e-Rulemaking Portal. Go to 

www.regulations.gov/

#!docketDetail;D=NOAA-NMFS-2015- 

0110, click the ‘‘Comment Now!’’ icon, 

complete the required fields, and enter 

or attach your comments. 

• Mail: Submit written comments to 

Glenn Merrill, Assistant Regional 

Administrator, Sustainable Fisheries 

Division, Alaska Region NMFS, Attn: 

Ellen Sebastian. Mail comments to P.O. 

Box 21668, Juneau, AK 99802–1668. 

Instructions: Comments sent by any 

other method, to any other address or 

individual, or received after the end of 

the comment period, may not be 

considered by NMFS. All comments 

received are a part of the public record 

and will generally be posted for public 

viewing on www.regulations.gov 

without change. All personal identifying 

information (e.g., name, address), 

confidential business information, or 

otherwise sensitive information 

submitted voluntarily by the sender will 

be publicly accessible. NMFS will 

accept anonymous comments (enter ‘‘N/ 

A’’ in the required fields if you wish to 

remain anonymous). 

Electronic copies of the Alaska 

Groundfish Harvest Specifications Final 

Environmental Impact Statement (Final 

EIS), Record of Decision (ROD) for the 

Final EIS, Supplementary Information 

Report (SIR) to the Final EIS, and the 

Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis 

(IRFA) prepared for this action may be 

obtained from http://

www.regulations.gov or from the Alaska 

Region Web site at http://alaska

fisheries.noaa.gov. The final 2014 Stock 

Assessment and Fishery Evaluation 

(SAFE) report for the groundfish 

resources of the GOA, dated November 

2014, is available from the North Pacific 

Fishery Management Council (Council) 

at 605 West 4th Avenue, Suite 306, 

Anchorage, AK 99501, phone 907–271– 

2809, or from the Council’s Web site at 

http://www.npfmc.org. The draft 2015 

SAFE report for the GOA will be 

available from the same source. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Obren Davis, 907–586–7228. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: NMFS 

manages the GOA groundfish fisheries 

in the exclusive economic zone (EEZ) of 

the GOA under the Fishery Management 

Plan for Groundfish of the Gulf of 

Alaska (FMP). The Council prepared the 

FMP under the authority of the 

Magnuson-Stevens Fishery 

Conservation and Management Act 

(Magnuson-Stevens Act), 16 U.S.C. 

1801, et seq. Regulations governing U.S. 

fisheries and implementing the FMP 

appear at 50 CFR parts 600, 679, and 

680. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS