alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2017006EN.01001501.xml

| 9.1.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 6/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.1.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 6/15

---

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 9 November 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Mureş — Romania) — ENEFI Energiahatékonysági Nyrt v Direcția Generală Regională a Finanțelor Publice Brașov (DGRFP)

(Case C-212/15) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Judicial cooperation in civil matters - Insolvency proceedings - Regulation (EC) No 1346/2000 - Article 4 - Effects provided for by legislation of a Member State on claims which were not pursued by means of insolvency proceedings - Forfeiture - Fiscal nature of the claim - No effect - Article 15 - Concept of ‘lawsuits pending’ - Enforcement proceedings - Excluded))

(2017/C 006/18)

Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunalul Mureş

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: ENEFI Energiahatékonysági Nyrt

Applicant:

Defendant: Direcția Generală Regională a Finanțelor Publice Brașov (DGRFP)

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

| 1. | Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1346/2000 of 29 May 2000 on insolvency proceedings must be interpreted as meaning that provisions of domestic law of the Member State on the territory of which insolvency proceedings are opened which provide, in relation to a creditor who has not taken part in those proceedings, for the forfeiture of its right to pursue its claim or for the suspension of the enforcement of such a claim in another Member State come within its scope of application. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1346/2000 of 29 May 2000 on insolvency proceedings must be interpreted as meaning that provisions of domestic law of the Member State on the territory of which insolvency proceedings are opened which provide, in relation to a creditor who has not taken part in those proceedings, for the forfeiture of its right to pursue its claim or for the suspension of the enforcement of such a claim in another Member State come within its scope of application.

| 2. | The fiscal nature of the claim pursued by means of enforcement in a Member State other than that on the territory of which the insolvency proceedings are opened, in a situation such as that at issue in the main proceedings, has no bearing on the answer to be given to the first question referred for a preliminary ruling. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The fiscal nature of the claim pursued by means of enforcement in a Member State other than that on the territory of which the insolvency proceedings are opened, in a situation such as that at issue in the main proceedings, has no bearing on the answer to be given to the first question referred for a preliminary ruling.

---

(1)  OJ C 262, 10.8.2015, p. 4.

1

---
```

[110th Congress Public Law 127]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ127.110]

[[Page 121 STAT. 1355]]

Public Law 110-127
110th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
 200 North William Street in Goldsboro, North Carolina, as the ``Philip 
 A. Baddour, Sr. Post Office''. <<NOTE: Nov. 30, 2007 -  [H.R. 3382]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. PHILIP A. BADDOUR, SR. POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 200 North William Street in Goldsboro, North Carolina, shall 
be known and designated as the ``Philip A. Baddour, Sr. Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Philip A. 
Baddour, Sr. Post Office''.

    Approved November 30, 2007.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 3382:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 153 (2007):
            Oct. 1, considered and passed House.
            Nov. 16, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
No. 47554.

#### Petition 6120-R of May Co. (Cleveland).

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

At the hearing three witnesses testified in behalf of the petitioning company. It appeared from this testimony that the customs broker who made the entry consulted several people, including the appraiser, in order to ascertain the correct value of the merchandise inasmuch as they found on the invoice there was a current selling price at the date of exportation that was higher than the other selling price there given. It appeared that after the merchandise had been appraised the witness learned from the New York office of the foreign manufacturer that a mistake had been made in “that they had neglected *415to notify their principals in Belfast that they had furnished the appraiser in New York with new values, and that in fact the values that the examiner had in Cleveland were correct.” Upon receipt of such information the petitioner decided not to institute contemplated reappraisement proceedings. The appraiser at Cleveland testified that from his dealings over a period of many years hq was satisfied that the reputation of the petitioner was very good and that he had never considered any of its acts as an attempt to defraud the Government of its revenues. From a careful consideration of the record presented it was found there was no intention to defraud the revenue of the United States or to conceal or misrepresent the facts of the case. • The petition was therefore granted.'
Before the Second Division,

February 4, 1942

No. 46917.

#### Protests 50837-K-90068, etc., of Stern McGivney & Co. (Chicago).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In view of stipulation of counsel that certain items consist of knotted sisal hats the same as those involved in Abstract 46497 the cíaim at 25 percent ad valorem under paragraph 1504 (b) (1) was sustained.
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v ROGER B. DESHAZOR, Private First Class, U. S. Army, Appellant

14 USCMA 667, 34 CMR 447

No. 17,530

July 2, 1964

*Colonel Joseph L. Chalk*and *Captain Charles W. Schiesser*were on the brief for Appellant, Accused.

*Lieutenant Colonel Francis M. Cooper*and *Captain John C. Cortesio, Jr.,*were on the brief for Appellee, United States.

Opinion of the Court

Quinn, Chief Judge:

A general court-martial convicted the accused of unauthorized absence and missing movement, in violation of Articles 86 and 87, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC §§ 886 and 887, respectively, and sentenced him to a bad-conduct discharge, total forfeitures, •confinement at hard labor for one year, •and reduction in rank. The law officer instructed the court-martial on the correct maximum punishment which could be adjudged, but did not inform it that the offenses found were the same for sentence purposes. See United States v Posnick, 8 USCMA 201, 24 CMR 11.

The question before us is whether the accused was prejudiced by the failure to advise the court-martial as to the number of offenses upon which the maximum sentence was predicated. The issue was considered in United States v Green, 9 USCMA 585, 26 CMR 365. It was there held that since the law officer informed the court of the correct legal maximum penalty no prejudice could result. Since the *Green*case, supra, is controlling, the decision of the board of review is affirmed. See also United States v Searles, 14 USCMA 643, 34 CMR 423.

Judge Kilday concurs.

Fekguson, Judge

(dissenting):

I dissent.

In United States v Searles, 14 USCMA 643, 34 CMR 423, I set forth fully my reasons for concluding that a law officer, or president of a special court-martial, must, in addition to giving a proper instruction on the maximum sentence, advise the court-martial that the multiplicious offenses of which it has convicted the accused are, in reality, one crime. United States v Posnick, 8 USCMA 201, 24 CMR 11. As in *Searles,*supra, this decision permits the court members to sentence the accused under the impression that he has committed a number of different crimes, so long as they are correctly informed concerning the permissible maximum sentence.

*668Such a view overrules *Posnick,*supra, and, to the detriment of the defendant, will lead, as it did here, to the imposition of near maximum penalties.. The court-martial cannot but be impressed by the number of counts alleged against an individual, and to allow the sentencing process to be executed on the basis of apparently separate crimes which, for sentencing purposes, constitute no more than a single violation of the Code is so clearly wrong as to defy analysis. An accused should be punished for what he has done and not for that which the ingenuity of the draftsman of the charges indicates he has done.

I would reverse the decision of the board of review and return the case with directions to reassess the sentence or order a rehearing thereon.
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 761/2006

of 18 May 2006         

fixing the export refunds on cereals and on wheat or rye flour, groats and meal

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The export refunds on the products listed in Article 1(a), (b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003, excluding malt, exported in the natural state, shall be as set out in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 19 May 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 18 May 2006.

For the Commission

J. L. DEMARTY            

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

----

(1)OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78. Regulation as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1154/2005 (OJ L 187, 19.7.2005, p. 11).

(2)OJ L 147, 30.6.1995, p. 7. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 777/2004 (OJ L 123, 27.4.2004, p. 50).

----

ANNEX

to the Commission Regulation of 18 May 2006 fixing the export refunds on cereals and on wheat or rye flour, groats and meal

----
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of Consumers  Financial
Corporation  (the  "Company")  for the period ended June 30, 2003, as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Donald J. Hommel,  Chief Executive  Officer and Chief  Financial  Officer of the
Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13
                  (a) or 15  (d) of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of  1934,  as
                  amended; and

         (2)      The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.




Date  January , 2004            By /s/ Donald J. Hommel
      --------------               ----------------------------------------
                                   Donald J. Hommel
                                   Chief Executive Officer and Chief
                                   Financial Officer


This  certification  accompanies  this  Report  pursuant  to Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and  shall not be deemed  filed by the  Company  for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to Consumers  Financial  Corporation  and will be retained by Consumers
Financial Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 55 (Monday, March 23, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 15189]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-06543]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ARCHITECTURAL AND TRANSPORTATION BARRIERS COMPLIANCE BOARD

[Docket No. ATBCB-2013-0001]
RIN 3014-AA42

Rail Vehicles Access Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board.

ACTION: Notice of charter renewal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the Rail Vehicles Access Advisory 
Committee's (RVAAC) charter is being renewed.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul Beatty, Designated Federal 
Officer at (202) 272-0012 (Voice); (202) 272-0072 (TTY). Electronic 
mail address: /board.gov">board.gov">rvaac@access-board.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to Section 14(a)(2)(A) of the 
Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), and in accordance with 
Title 41 of the Code of Federal Regulations, section 102-3.65(a), and 
following consultation with the Committee Management Secretariat, 
General Services Administration, the RVAAC charter is renewed. The 
Committee will provide advice to the Access Board on revising and 
updating our accessibility guidelines issued pursuant to the Americans 
with Disabilities Act for transportation vehicles that operate on fixed 
guideway systems (e.g., rapid rail, light rail, commuter rail, 
intercity rail, and high speed rail). Additionally, the renewal of the 
RVAAC has been determined to be essential to the work of the Access 
Board and to be in the public interest in connection with the 
performance of duties required by law. The Committee will continue to 
operate in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act and the rules and regulations that implement that Act.

David M. Capozzi,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 2015-06543 Filed 3-20-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8150-01-P
```
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 80 (Thursday, April 26, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 20851]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-8077]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES (HHS)

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH); 
Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health (ABRWH)

    Correction: This notice was published in the Federal Register on 
April 17, 2007, Volume 72, Number 73, pages 19207-19208. In addition to 
the ABRWH meeting scheduled for May 2-4, 2007, a meeting of the 
Subcommittee for Dose Reconstruction Reviews (SDRR) will also be 
convened on May 2, 2007. The meeting times for the ABRWH have been 
changed. The matters to be discussed by the SDRR are included below.

Subcommittee Meeting Time and Date

9 a.m.-11:30 a.m., May 2, 2007.

Committee Meeting Times and Dates

12:30 p.m.-4:30 p.m., May 2, 2007.
8 a.m.-5:45 p.m., May 3, 2007.
8 a.m.-2:30 p.m., May 4, 2007.

    Matters to be Discussed: The topics for the Subcommittee meeting 
include Discussion of Reviewed Cases; Selection of Cases to Be 
Reviewed; and Discussion of Overall Review Process.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Lewis V. Wade, Executive 
Secretary, NIOSH, CDC, 4676 Columbia Parkway, Cincinnati, Ohio 45226, 
telephone 513.533.6825, fax 513.533.6826.
    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining to 
announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, 
for both CDC and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

    Dated: April 20, 2007.
Elaine L. Baker,
Acting Director, Management Analysis and Services Office Centers for 
Disease Control and Prevention.
 [FR Doc. E7-8077 Filed 4-25-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
Exhibit
10.1


 


JOINT
FILING AGREEMENT


 


AGREEMENT
dated as of April 15, 2022 between Stanley F. Buchthal and Dakota Group, Ltd. (the “Parties”, each a “Party”).


 


Each
Party hereto represents to the other Party that it is eligible to use Schedule 13D to report its beneficial ownership in shares of Common
Stock, $0.0001 par value per share, of Yale Transaction Finders, Inc. Each Party hereto agrees that the Schedule 13D, dated April 15,
2022, relating to such beneficial ownership, is filed on behalf of each of them.


 


Each
of the Parties agrees to be responsible for the timely filing of the Schedule 13D and any and all amendments thereto and for the completeness
and accuracy of the information concerning itself contained in the Schedule 13D, and the other Party to the extent it knows or has reason
to believe that any information about the other Party is inaccurate.


 


	 	STANLEY F. BUCHTHAL
	 	 
	 	 	/s/
    Stanley F. Buchthal
	 	 	 
	 	THE DAKOTA GROUP, LTD.
	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Stanley
    F. Buchthal
	 	 	Stanley
    F. Buchthal

    Managing
    Member
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# Executive leadership development program, developing tomorrow's leaders today

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  Executive leadership development program, developing tomorrow's leaders today 
                    -           Creator        
                    -  United States. Department of Defense 
                    -           Publisher        
                    -  United States. Department of Defense 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1980-1990 
                    -           Subject: Place        
                    -  United States 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  162 × 46 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Zeutschel OS 12000 Scanner at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at the University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  022215973.jpg; 022215973.jpg 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
# C_2016343EN.01001501.xml

| 19.9.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 343/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.9.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 343/15

---

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 7 July 2016 — Westfälische Drahtindustrie GmbH, Westfälische Drahtindustrie Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, Pampus Industriebeteiligungen GmbH & Co. KG v European Commission

(Case C-523/15 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - European prestressing steel market - Fines - Appraisal of the ability to pay - The 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines - Unlimited jurisdiction - Taking into account facts subsequent to the contested decision - Principles of proportionality and equal treatment - Right to effective judicial protection))

(2016/C 343/22)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Appellants: Westfälische Drahtindustrie GmbH, Westfälische Drahtindustrie Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, Pampus Industriebeteiligungen GmbH & Co. KG (represented by: C. Stadler, Rechtsanwalt)

Appellants:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: V. Bottka, H. Leupold and G. Meessen, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

| 2. | Westfälische Drahtindustrie GmbH, Westfälische Drahtindustrie Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG and Pampus Industriebeteiligungen GmbH & Co. KG shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Westfälische Drahtindustrie GmbH, Westfälische Drahtindustrie Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG and Pampus Industriebeteiligungen GmbH & Co. KG shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 389, 23.11.2015.

1

---
ltr e%o lwlw l @mrlty wer nmlgable rrtwaw, 

falledtoobtalrimwh~ 

the atate. The oourt he T d tha6 l tete pollee 

onl aad Itr 8ot1on 

~~euo ui, &$plloable to ageaoler md omploymer of the 

4 o mr a mmwt b ea luo h a gendea r ud emp lo yeea r s e ea r * 

lq o p muih o tlal xelualre4 mr rithia~the paver of the United 

steer. __...’ 

. . 2he law prlaolple he0 oowiatea~~beei enutolatd .~dourt ia other bwear In ohto f*.Thoaw, 17-3 0.8. 276 

the State of @alo objeoted kaaue oloomargutlne wm 

sed:t0’&tee oLr*fede~alrol4iuB’hoael~t84fnOhio 

ooqtrup to a rtite rot regmlat the 

.. h reJeotlq tblm objection, th@ 30 

060 of 0leawrprAne. 

urt rudr 

.~ 

..:: , 

‘. . . 

;- ‘:. 

al Jaharoa t* St&e Of narplmi, 254 ua. 81 &w) 

~skk~~rtea~ooa*i6ted~e~~e ortho Po&OS- 

~floe38partmeat ior trwuwW.ag mll over roada In Harplaud 

rithoot hw* flrrt been emmined 8nd o b ta hed l drlver~i ilk 

eenw fr o 8 the Stats. 

tioe X0&18 roidt.. 

IareYf~fn;g thb OoPtlOtiOn, I&. Jim-’ 

. _, 

"It l eemo to um that the rrwrmity of the 

of the United Water foam 8tato ooariormtkaoe of their dutier extenda 
s: 

.~.. 

sua8tanoo8~ the polioe power oi the State ha8 90. 

l p p lio a ti. o n. . . In & ma er tin th ag tt h ir o ff%- 

o er a mlera ush o ir ewta to ëino a exem r fp r o t a the 

rtate l&v, the United Stator am not UuCeW olaialag jw~adiotion wer thla 

Y 

tieular plwe of 

unst, in o#paition to tha angwge o? the aot &‘ 

Oongre88 o&bag baok tha jurirdiatlon the TIntted : 

state, reoeiWed frem the stat& The overzllllbnt $8 ,:; bat &d.dng tht at8 mm oH$o8r8,. de P dlSeh6r~- 

lng dutler under Peder8l l &harit~ p ur r uatont .- a nd 

br vlrtw oi valid #‘e&ml kv8, me not wubjeot 

to wrest or other ZlrrOillty tin&~ the Sam & the 

State In rbioh kheir du%ios urn pesfm.”