alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
An equal opportunity employer 

Thomas M. Gray 

211(b) Technical Manager 

1220 L Street, Northwest

Washington, DC 20005-4070

Tel 202-682-8480 

Fax 202-682-8270 

E-mail grayt@api.org

May 4, 2010 

Karl Simon 

Director 

Compliance and Innovative Strategies Division 

1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N. W. 

Mail Code: 6406J 

Washington, DC 20460 

• RE: CAA Section 211(b) Fuels and Fuel Additives Health Effects Testing Regulation: Third Draft Final 

Report: Gasoline ETBE Vapor Condensate: A One-Generation Whole-Body Inhalation Reproduction 

Toxicity Study in Rats (Study No. 00-4204) 

Dear Mr. Simon: 

The American Petroleum Institute (API), on behalf of the Section 211(b) Research Group (RG), is submitting the 

following information for EPA review and approval as partial fulfillment of the CAA Section 211(b) Alternative 

Tier 2 requirements of the testing regulation: 

• Third Draft Final Report: Gasoline ETBE Vapor Condensate: A One-Generation Whole-Body 

Inhalation Reproduction Toxicity Study in Rats (Study No. 00-4204) 

• Reviewer Checklist 

The Third Draft Final Report addresses all EPA and independent reviewer comments as indicated, with page 

citation, in the Reviewer Checklist. 

When the RG receives EPA’s approval of the third draft report, the final study report will be submitted to you at 

the EPA Office of Transportation and Air Quality, Transportation and Regional Programs Division, as part of the 

requirements of Clean Air Act Section 211(b)(2) and 211(e) (Docket No. A-90-07). If you require further 

information, please contact Tom Gray by mail at this address. 

Regards, 

Thomas M. Gray 

Encl (2): 

• Third Draft Final Report: Gasoline ETBE Vapor Condensate: A One-Generation Whole-Body Inhalation 

Reproduction Toxicity Study in Rats (Study No. 00-4204) 

• Reviewer Checklist 

 

cc: Joe Sopata, EPA
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 2261/2004

of 28 December 2004         

fixing the amount of the carry-over aid and the flat-rate aid for certain fishery products for the 2005 fishing year

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 104/2000 of 17 December 1999 on the common organisation of the markets in fishery and aquaculture products (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 2814/2000 of 21 December 2000 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 104/2000 as regards the grant of carry-over aid for certain fishery products (2), and in particular Article 5 thereof,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 939/2001 of 14 May 2001 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 104/2000 as regards the grant of flat-rate aid for certain fishery products (3), and in particular Article 5 thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For the 2005 fishing year, the amounts of the carry-over aid referred to in Article 23 of Regulation (EC) No 104/2000, and the amounts of the flat-rate aid referred to in Article 24(4) of that Regulation, are set out in the Annex to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

It shall apply from 1 January 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 28 December 2004.

For the Commission

Joe BORG            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 17, 21.1.2000, p. 22.

(2)OJ L 326, 22.12.2000, p. 34.

(3)OJ L 132, 15.5.2001, p. 10.

----

ANNEX

1.   Amount of the carry-over aid for products listed in Annex I, (A) and (B) and for sole (Solea spp.) listed in Annex I, (C) to Regulation (EC) No 104/2000

2.   Amount of the carry-over aid for the other products listed in Annex I, (C) to Regulation (EC) No 104/2000

3.   Amount of the flat-rate aid for products listed in Annex IV to Regulation (EC) No 104/2000

----
[Cite as State ex rel. Wilson v. McGee , 123 Ohio St.3d 341, 2009-Ohio-5261.]

T HE S TATE EX REL . W ILSON , A PPELLANT , v. M C G EE , J UDGE , A PPELLEE . [Cite as State ex rel. Wilson v. McGee , 123 Ohio St.3d 341, 2009-Ohio-5261.] Mandamus — Writ sought by criminal defe ndant to correct his sentence — Trial court was authorized to correct its clerical error in mistakenly characterizing the degree of the o ffense of which the defendant was convicted — Court of appeals’ denial of writ affirmed. (No. 2009-1038 — Submitted September 30, 2009 — Decided October 8, 2009.)
A PPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Montgomery County, No. CA 23333.

__________________ Per Curiam. {¶ 1} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals dismissing the petition of appellant, Lawrence E. Wilson, for a writ of mandamus to correct his sentence. The common pleas court was au thorized under Crim.R. 36 to correct its clerical error in mistakenly characterizing the degree of the offense of which
Wilson was convicted. See State ex rel. Cruzado v. Zaleski , 111 Ohio St.3d 353, 2006-Ohio-5795, 856 N.E.2d 263, ¶ 19. More over, Wilson had an adequate remedy by appeal to raise his claim of noncompliance with Crim.R. 32. Id. at ¶ 32. Finally, Wilson waived this claim on appeal by failing to raise it in his petition in the court of appeals and by not seeking to amend his petition. See State ex rel. R.W. Sidley, Inc. v. Crawford , 100 Ohio St.3d 113, 2003-Ohio-5101, 796 N.E.2d 929, ¶ 32. Judgment affirmed.
M OYER , C.J., and P FEIFER , L UNDBERG S TRATTON , O’C ONNOR , O’D ONNELL , L ANZINGER , and C UPP , JJ., concur.

__________________ Lawrence E. Wilson, pro se.S UPREME C OURT OF O HIO

2 Mathias H. Heck Jr., Montgomery County Prosecuting Attorney, and John A. Cumming, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.

______________________
# Official Journal L 225I/2021

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 225I |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6425 June 2021 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 225I

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6425 June 2021

---

| Contents | | | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/1029 of 24 June 2021 amending Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/159 to prolong the safeguard measure on imports of certain steel products | 1 |

Contents

page

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/1029 of 24 June 2021 amending Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/159 to prolong the safeguard measure on imports of certain steel products

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
The State of TexasAppellee/s



# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

July 21, 2014

N o. 04

- 14

- 00060

- CR

John DONOHUE

, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

From the 187th Ju dicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013CR3514 Honorable Raymond Angelini, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

The State’s brief was originally due June 12, 2014; however, the court granted appellant an extension of time to file the brief until July 14, 2014. The State has filed a motion requesting an additional thirty days to file its brief.

We grant the motion and order the State to file its brief by August 13, 2014. Counsel is advised that no further extensions of time will be granted absent a motion that (1) demonstrates extraordinary circumstances justifying further delay, (2) advise s the court of the efforts counsel has expended in preparing the brief, and (3) provide s the court reasonable assurance that the brief will be completed and filed by the requested extended deadline

.

_________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 21st day of July, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                     <C>       
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       Mar-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                          Apr-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                            Dec-31-1995                     
<CASH>                                    1,200,385        
<SECURITIES>                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                            15,005,322
<ALLOWANCES>                                221,808
<INVENTORY>                               9,538,002
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         25,818,875   
<PP&E>                                   19,840,815
<DEPRECIATION>                           11,488,964
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           40,609,286    
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     9,960,245
<BONDS>                                           0
<COMMON>                                    543,686
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                               30,105,355
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             40,609,286
<SALES>                                  49,074,279
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         49,074,279
<CGS>                                    22,026,769
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            22,092,263
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           (228,666)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             35,829
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           16,099
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           5,183,913   
<INCOME-TAX>                              1,814,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       3,369,913
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                              3,369,913  
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   .61
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   .60

        

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

CERTIFICATION

I, Dale H.Sizemore, Jr., certify that:

1.      I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB ofTorotel, Inc.

2.     Based on my knowledge, this quarterlyreport does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3.      Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this quarterly report;

4.      The registrant’s other certifying officerand I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and we have:

    a)        designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this quarterly report is being prepared;

    b)        evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as ofa date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the “EvaluationDate”); and

    c)         presentedin this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the EvaluationDate;

5.      The registrant’s other certifying officerand I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent function):

    a)         allsignificant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls whichcould adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarizeand report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors anymaterial weaknesses in internal controls; and

    b)        anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and

6.      The registrant’s other certifying officerand I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there weresignificant changes in internal controls or in other factors that couldsignificantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our mostrecent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses.

 
| /s/   Dale H. Sizemore, Jr. |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|
|                                  |
|                                  |
| Dale H.  Sizemore, Jr.                |
| Chief Executive  Officer              |
| September 12,  2006                   |

 

----
In The Matter Of: 

SERVED: MARCH 19, 2014 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

Docket No. FAA-2013-0047 

FACILITY SOLUTIONS, INC. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No. 2012NE70012S 

Respondent 

ORDER DISMISSING PROCEEDING 

On February 26, 2014, an Order Cancelling the Hearing and Setting a Third Status 

Conference was filed. This Order cancelled the March 2014 litigation deadlines, cancelled the 

Hearing set for April S-9, 2014, and set a Third Status Conference for AprilS, 2014. 

On March 1S, 2014, the Respondent filed Respondent's Withdrawal of Request for 

Hearing stating that the parties have resolved the controversy and requesting· that the matter be 

dismissed. 

After having reviewed the case file, all pleadings and motions, all relevant case law, 

statutes, regulations, rules, and authority, and being fully advised; 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 

1. The Third Status Conference set for AprilS, 2014, at 1:30 p.m. Eastern time is cancelled. 

2. Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 13.215, the Respondent has withdrawn its Request for Hearing, 

and this proceeding is dismissed with prejudice. 

Attachment: Service List 
SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence A venue, S. W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W10001 

Mr. Brian K. Khan 

Complainant's Counsel 

Office of the Regional Counsel 

Federal Aviation Administration 

2300 East Devon A venue, AGL-7H 

Des Plaines, IL 60018 

TEL: 847-294-7652 

FAX: 847-294-7498 

. Mr. Roy J. Transit 

Respondent's Counsel 

P.O. Box 1578 

Royal Oak, MI 48068-1578 

TEL: 586-491-6822 

Judge J .E. Sullivan 

US. Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

ONE COPY 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-6941 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

FDMS No. F AA-2013-0047 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
No. 51176.

#### Protests 719893-G, etc., of Rothenberger & Gallagher, Inc. (New York).

*298Opinion by

Keefe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following Abstract 48269 it was held that an allowance of 2J4 percent should have been made in the weight of the cheese by the collector in computing the duty thereon to compensate for the weight of the inedible coverings on the outside of the cheese. The protests were sustained to this extent.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 9291 

To direct the Secretary of the Army to provide a briefing to Congress 

on the efforts of the Army to field passive multi-static radar detection 

technology for mobile counter-UAS systems, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 2, 2024 

Ms. SLOTKIN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of the Army to provide a briefing 

to Congress on the efforts of the Army to field passive 

multi-static radar detection technology for mobile 

counter-UAS systems, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. BRIEFING ON PASSIVE MULTI-STATIC RADAR 

4 DETECTION EFFORTS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than February 1, 2025, 

6 the Secretary of the Army shall provide to the Committees 

7 on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Rep8 resentatives a briefing on the efforts of the Army to field 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 9291 IH

1 passive multi-static radar detection technology for mobile 

2 counter-UAS systems. 

3 (b) ELEMENTS.—The briefing under subsection (a) 

4 shall address— 

5 (1) the plan of the Army to incorporate passive 

6 multi-static radar technology into its existing 

7 counter-UAS system and base defense architecture; 

8 (2) efforts within the Army to integrate passive 

9 multi-static radar technology into integrated 

10 counter-UAS systems; 

11 (3) an assessment of any capability gaps in 

12 threat detection technology and threat defeat sys13 tems; and 

14 (4) any research, development, test, and evalua15 tion activities that are being conduced, or that are 

16 planned to be conducted, with respect to passive 

17 multi-static radar detection. 

18 (c) DEFINITION.—In this section, the term ‘‘counter19 UAS system’’ has the meaning given that term in section 

20 44801 of title 49, United States Code. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 212 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 212

 Expressing the sense of the Senate that the Federal Trade Commission 
  should investigate the publication of the video game ``Grand Theft 
    Auto: San Andreas'' to determine if the publisher deceived the 
   Entertainment Software Ratings Board to avoid an ``Adults Only'' 
                                rating.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 26, 2005

Mr. Brownback submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
         the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing the sense of the Senate that the Federal Trade Commission 
  should investigate the publication of the video game ``Grand Theft 
    Auto: San Andreas'' to determine if the publisher deceived the 
   Entertainment Software Ratings Board to avoid an ``Adults Only'' 
                                rating.

Whereas the Entertainment Software Ratings Board gave the video game ``Grand 
        Theft Auto: San Andreas'' a rating of ``Mature'';
Whereas the video game ``Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas'' contains sexually 
        explicit content that consumers are able to access but that appears to 
        have been hidden from the Entertainment Software Ratings Board in order 
        to avoid a rating of ``Adults Only'';
Whereas the Entertainment Software Ratings Board took swift action in 
        investigating the matter and revoked the ``Mature'' rating, ensuring 
        that any future sales of the video game ``Grand Theft Auto: San 
        Andreas'' will be under an ``Adults Only'' rating; and
Whereas Rockstar Games, the publisher of the video game ``Grand Theft Auto: San 
        Andreas'', may have deceived the Entertainment Software Ratings Board 
        and consumers: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that--
            (1) the Federal Trade Commission should investigate the 
        publication of the video game ``Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas'' 
        to determine if the publisher, Rockstar Games, deceived the 
        Entertainment Software Ratings Board to avoid an ``Adults 
        Only'' rating; and
            (2) if the Federal Trade Commission determines that 
        Rockstar Games committed such deception, the Commission should 
        impose the maximum penalty possible.
                                 <all>
```
## DJI **S900 PRE**  **- FLIGHT CHECKLIST** 

**BEFORE DEPARTING FOR SITE CHECK**  Aircraft (AC) and Remote Controller (RC) batteries fully charged Tablet fully charged Portabl e Radio for communicating with manned AC fully charged Ensure SD card has free space and is inserted into the camera Ensure Firmware is updated on AC and RC(s) Cache location maps into all DJI Pilot app devices Check for frequency (FX) used by local ma nned AC ( Skyvector.com ) Check if flight location is in No - Fly Zone (Check here: airmap.io ) Program local FX into portable radio Check for NOTAMs and Temporary Flight Restrictions (TFRs) Check weather

 Precipitation less than 5 - 10%  Winds under 20kts  Cloud layer above 500' (152M)  1 statute mile visibility 

### LOCATION ON **- SITE CHECK**  Check flying area free of overhead obstructions

 Wires, low flying AC, trees, tall buildings  Antennas that may interfere with compass and GPS reception Weather meets conditions

 Winds under 20 kts (23 MPH or 10 meters per second)  Clouds above 500’ (152M)  Visibility for 1 statute mile Confirm flight plan with camera operator and/or spotter

### PHYSICAL AIRCRAFT CH **ECK**

Desired ND filter attached to camera Camera locked in place SD card in camera Motors clear of Foreign Object Debris (FOD) Chec k propellers for any melting, misshapen, or cracks Propellers hand tight Prop locks firmly **REMOTE CONTROLLER CH ECK**  Antennas oriented Properly Switch to P - GPS mode Landing gear switch oriented down Check battery level of RC for minimum 95% **DJI GO AP P CHECK**  Maximum Flight altitude set 121 Meters (400’) Failsafe Mode, Set for 10M Clearance above lowest obstacle in flight plan RC Signal Lost set to Return -to- Home Check Sensors

 Gyroscope between “- 1.0 to +1.0”  Acceleration between “- 1.0 to +1.0”  Comp ass MOD between “1400 - 1599”  Check IMU Image Transmission Channel set Note: Watch channels for 30 seconds to ensure selected channel is indeed stable Battery Cells all 4.28V or greater

 At least 98% battery  Ensure no greater than .2V between battery cel ls Adjust Gimbal Roll to make level Ensure enough Satellites are locked (recommend 16)Set Camera Orientation mode

Turn all devices to airplane mode Face AC into the wind Check heading of Aircraft Start Video recording Start Propellers using a Combined Stick Command (CSC) Ensure blue dot representing RC is accurately located on map Ensure home point is accurately set on map Ensure elevation reads 0 (zero )
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-21-00125-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF R.D., A CHILD §

§

§

§

On Appeal from the 233rd District 

Court

of Tarrant County (233-679221-20)

September 16, 2021

Memorandum Opinion by Justice 

Bassel

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was no error in the trial court’s order. It is ordered that the order of the trial court is 

affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Dabney Bassel

 Justice Dabney Bassel