alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# Diving by day

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  Diving by day 
                    -           Creator        
                    -  United States. NavyShepler, Dwight Clark, 1905- 
                    -           Publisher        
                    -  U.S. Navy 
                    -           Description        
                    -  Diving by Day by Dwight Shepler 
                    -           Subjects        
                    -  United States. Navy 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1990-2000 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  171 × 56 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Ideal Contex Magnum G600 54 Plus at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at The University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  025528711.jpg 
                    -           OCLC Collection Number        
                    -  429489521 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, John C. Lawrence, President, and Chief Executive Officer of United States
Antimony Corporation (the "Company") do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to my knowledge:

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended
March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ John C. Lawrence                                    Date:  14 May 2008
-------------------------------------                          -----------
John C. Lawrence
President and Chief Executive Officer
No. 47516.

#### Protests 72919-K, etc., of Strauss-Eckardt Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of *Strauss-Eckardt*v. *United States*(T. D. 48272) the manger sets in question were held dutiable as manufactures of papier-máché at 25 percent- under paragraph 1403, as claimed.
EXHIBIT 11 -  Computation of Earnings Per Share



Item 6(a)
Exhibit 11
Computation of Earnings per Share
United Industrial Corporation and Subsidiaries

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                          Three Months Ended         Six Months Ended
                                              June 30                     June 30
                                          ------------------         -----------------

                                           1998         1997          1998         1997
                                           ----         ----          ----         ----

<S>                                <C>           <C>           <C>         <C> 

Net income                           $2,298,000   $1,670,000    $4,621,000   $3,433,000
                                     ==========   ==========    ==========   ==========

Basic earnings per share:
   Weighted average shares           12,325,530   12,176,443    12,289,947   12,175,693
                                     ==========   ==========    ==========   ==========

Effect of dilutive securities:
   Employee and non-employee
     director stock options             338,837      193,469       388,980      151,311
                                        =======      =======       =======      =======

Diluted earnings per share:
   Adjusted weighted-average
     and assumed conversions         12,664,367    12,369,912    12,678,927  12,327,004
                                     ==========    ==========    ==========  ==========


Basic earnings per share                 $  .19       $  .14         $  .38      $  .28
                                         ======       ======         ======      ======
Diluted earnings per share               $  .18       $  .14         $  .36      $  .28
                                         ======       ======         ======      ======

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>





                                       11
**Home**

In the Spotlight

## EJ4Climate Grant Program Now Open: US$1.5M Available for Education, Environmental Justice, Climate Adaptation

**Tiohtià:ke (Montreal), 26 September 2024—**The Commission for Environmental Cooperation (CEC) is excited to announce that the fourth cycle of the US$1.5 million Environmental Justice for Climate (EJ4Climate) Grant Program is now open for applications for projects on “Community-led education programs to increase environmental justice and climate adaptation knowledge,” with up to C$175,000 in grant funding available for recipients.

Media Release

September 24, 2024Newsletter

### Summer Rewind: Looking back at CEC31 — Event Recordings, Summaries & Photos

September 18, 2024Media

### 2024 Monarch Butterfly Blitz Sets Records for Observations and Volunteer Efforts in North America

October 23, 2024Event

### Advancing supply chain transparency of chemical information in cosmetics and personal care products

Featured Project

## Community Solutions for Reducing Marine Litter

2019 - 2020                                            Active                                        Ecosystems                

Learn More All Projects

Featured Publication

## Cummins Filtración SLP: Implementation of an Energy Management System

Case Study

October 18, 2019                                    7 pages                                    Green Growth

This case study describes the implementation and certification of the ISO 50001 energy management standard at the Cummins Filtración SLP facility, which completed the CEC 2016-2017 North American Energy Management Pilot Program. The case study aims to make the private sector aware of the business case for energy management and its value in maintaining competitiveness.

Read More View Top 50 Publications

## Social
Exhibit 15(b)
                                                               
                                                               



UniSource Energy Corporation
Tucson Electric Power Company
220 West Sixth Street
Tucson, Arizona  85701

We have made a review, in accordance with standards established
by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, of
the unaudited interim financial information of UniSource Energy
Corporation and subsidiaries (the Company) and Tucson Electric
Power Company and subsidiaries (TEP) for the three-month and six-
month periods ended June 30, 1997 as indicated in our report 
dated February 23, 1998; because we did not perform an audit, 
we expressed no opinion on that information.

We are aware that our report referred to above, which was
included in your Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended June 30, 1998 is incorporated by reference in
Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement No. 33-
55732 of TEP on Form S-3, and Registration Statement No. 333-
43765, No. 333-43767, No. 333-43769, No. 333-53309, No. 333-53333
and No. 333-53337 of the Company on Form S-8.

We are also aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to
Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered
a part of the Registration Statements prepared or certified by
an accountant or a report prepared or certified by an
accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.



DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Tucson, Arizona
August 12, 1998
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

-vsCarlos Mendez-Guezar

________________________________

Case No. 2:13-cr-108

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

The Defendant, by consent, has appeared before me pursuant to

Rule 11, F.R.Cr.P. and has entered a plea of guilty to Count one of

the Information. After examining the Defendant under oath concerning

each of the subjects mentioned in Rule 11, I determine that the

defendant is competent and capable of entering an informed plea, that

the guilty plea is knowingly and voluntary made and that the offenses

charged are supported by an independent basis in fact containing each

of the essential elements of such offense. 

 I therefore RECOMMEND the plea agreement and the plea of

guilty should be accepted and the Defendant should be adjudged guilty

and sentenced accordingly. Otherwise, the plea agreement should be

rejected and the defendant should be allowed to withdraw the guilty

plea. 

The Defendant remains in the custody of the U.S. Marshal pending

sentencing. 

Date: October 10, 2013 /s/ Terence P. Kemp 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE

Failure to file written objections to this Report and

Recommendation within fourteen (14) days from the date of its service

shall bar an aggrieved party from attacking such Report and

Recommendation before the assigned United States District Judge. 28

U.S.C. Section 636(b)(1)(B).

Case: 2:13-cr-00108-JLG-EPD Doc #: 35 Filed: 10/10/13 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Case No. 15,221.

#### UNITED STATES v. GODLEY.

[2 Cranch, C. C. 153.]1

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

Nov. Term, 1818.

Larceny op Slave — Indictment — Averments..

An indictment will not lie. at common law., for stealing "a mulatto boy, called Williami Foote, of the price of 500 dollars, of the property, goods, and chattels of one F. T.,” if he is-not averred to be a slave.

Indictment at common law [against James-Godley] for stealing a “mulatto boy, named William Foote, of the price of 500 dollars, of the goods and chattels of one Fanny Thomas.”

Mr. Swann and Mr. Taylor, for the prisoner,

moved the court to quash the indictment.. and contended that it was no offence at common law to steal a slave, because slavery was not known at common law. It is made an offence, by the Virginia statute, in one case only, namely; when stolen from the-possession of the owner or his overseer; and the courts of that state have decided that the possession of a person to whom the slave was hired, is not the possession of the owner or overseer. Com. v. Williams (in 1792) 1 Va. Cas. 15; Com. v. Hays (in 1798) 1 Va. Cas. 122. Those courts have also decided that an indictment at common law for stealing a slave cannot be supported.

N. Herbert and Mr. Mason, contra.

Slaves in Virginia are goods and chattels, and it is felony at common law to steal goods and chattels, therefore in Virginia, it is felony at common law to steal a slave. Judge Lyon’s opinion, 2 Wash. LVa.] 7. The Virginia statute is cumulative. The decision of the courts of that state are not conclusive *1342upon this court. State v. Hall. 2 Hayw. X. *i*C. 103. !

1

 [Reported by Hon. William Cranch, Chief Judge.]

THE COURT

(nem. con.) quashed the in- ; dictment, because it did not aver the boy to ■ be a slave.

Mr. Herbert, then moved that the prisoner should be recognized to appear at the next term to answer to a new indictment.

But THE COURT (nem. con.) refused; being of opinion that the decisions of the courts of Virginia, that an indictment at common law, for stealing a slave, cannot be supported, are conclusive upon this court.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsA first scramjet studyA variety of related scramjet engine topics are examined. The flow is assumed to be 1-D, the gas is thermally and calorically perfect, and focus is on low hypersonic Mach numbers. The thrust and lift of an exposed half nozzle, which is used on the aerospace plane, is evaluated as well as a fully confined nozzle. A rough estimate of the drag of an aerospace plane is provided. Thermal effects and shock waves are next discussed. A parametric scramjet model is then presented based on the influence coefficient method, which evaluates the dominant scramjet processes. The independent parameters are the ratio of specific heats, a nondimensional heat addition parameter, and four Mach numbers. The total thrust generated by the combustor and nozzle is shown to be independent of the heat release distribution and the combustor exit Mach number, providing thermal choking is avoided. An operating condition for the combustor is found that maximizes the thrust. An alternative condition is explored when this optimum is no longer realistic. This condition provides a favorable pressure gradient and a reasonable area ratio for the combustor. Parametric results based on the model is provided.Document ID19890010775Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsEmanuel, George*(Oklahoma Univ. Norman, OK, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateApril 1, 1989Subject CategoryAircraft Propulsion And PowerReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.26:184965NASA-CR-184965Accession Number89N20146Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAG1-886Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19890010775.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsA flight-test methodology for identification of an aerodynamic model for a V/STOL aircraftDescribed is a flight test methodology for developing a data base to be used to identify an aerodynamic model of a vertical and short takeoff and landing (V/STOL) fighter aircraft. The aircraft serves as a test bed at Ames for ongoing research in advanced V/STOL control and display concepts. The flight envelope to be modeled includes hover, transition to conventional flight, and back to hover, STOL operation, and normaL cruise. Although the aerodynamic model is highly nonlinear, it has been formulated to be linear in the parameters to be identified. Motivation for the flight test methodology advocated in this paper is based on the choice of a linear least-squares method for model identification. The paper covers elements of the methodology from maneuver design to the completed data base. Major emphasis is placed on the use of state estimation with tracking data to ensure consistency among maneuver variables prior to their entry into the data base. The design and processing of a typical maneuver is illustrated.Document ID19880007311Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypePreprint (Draft being sent to journal)AuthorsBach, Ralph E., Jr.*(NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA, United States)*Mcnally, B. David*(NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateMarch 1, 1988Subject CategoryAircraft Design, Testing And PerformanceReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:100067NASA-TM-100067A-88095Accession Number88N16694Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-66-41Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19880007311.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Case: 2:13-cv-00116-EAS-EPD Doc #: 44 Filed: 11/15/13 Page: 1 of 1  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-11T17:33:30-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
EX-31Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications.

 

 

I,Anthony Sfarra, certify that:

 

1.I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D requiredto be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of theWells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Trust 2016-C32 (the "Exchange Act periodicreports");

 

2.Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, donot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other informationrequired to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this reportis included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4.Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in thisreport under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in theExchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligationsunder the servicing agreements in all material respects; and

 

5.All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria forasset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment ofcompliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to beincluded in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB andExchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to thisreport, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances ofnoncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report onForm 10-K.

 

Ingiving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on informationprovided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:

 

NationalCooperative Bank, N.A., as NCB Master Servicer, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC,as Special Servicer, National Cooperative Bank, N.A., as NCB Special Servicer,Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee, Pentalpha Surveillance LLC,as Operating Advisor, CoreLogic Commercial Real Estate Services, Inc., asServicing Function Participant, and National Tax Search, LLC, as ServicingFunction Participant.

 

 

 

Dated:October 31, 2019

 

 

/s/Anthony Sfarra

 

 

President

(senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
```

[110th Congress Public Law 130]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ130.110]

[[Page 121 STAT. 1358]]

Public Law 110-130
110th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
  1400 Highway 41 North in Inverness, Florida, as the ``Chief Warrant 
     Officer Aaron Weaver Post Office Building''. <<NOTE: Nov. 30, 
                         2007 -  [H.R. 3530]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. CHIEF WARRANT OFFICER AARON WEAVER POST OFFICE 
                              BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 1400 Highway 41 North in Inverness, Florida, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Chief Warrant Officer Aaron Weaver Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Chief 
Warrant Officer Aaron Weaver Post Office Building''.

    Approved November 30, 2007.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 3530:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 153 (2007):
            Oct. 9, considered and passed House.
            Nov. 16, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
**Exhibit 31.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, Adrian Adams, certify that:

 

1.                                    I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Aralez Pharmaceuticals Inc. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017; and

 

2.                                    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

 

Date:  April 30, 2018

 
|   | /s/ Adrian Adams                |
|--------|---------------------------------|
|   | Adrian   Adams                  |
|   | Chief   Executive Officer       |
|   | (Principal   Executive Officer) |

 

----