-.



# The Attorney General of Texas February 21, 1980

Honorable Charles Evans, Chairman House Committee onGovernment Organizations P.0. Box2910 Austin, Texas 78769 Opinion No. l~q-142 Re: Authority of the Texas Department of Community Affairs to enter into an interagency contract with the Governor’s Committee onAging. Dear Representative Evans: Youask twoquestions concerning aninteragency contract entered into by the Governor’s Committee on Aging and the Texas Department of Community Affairs. Your first question involves state law, while your second question involves federal law. Youfirst ask: May the Texas Department of Community Affairs and the Governor’s Committee onAging enter into an interagency contract under which the department performs the following services for the committee:
‘general administrative services, including fiscal and accounting services, legal services, personnel services, public information services, management auditing services, andother administrative services?’ Webelieve both entities have authority to contract under the Interagency Cooperation Act, V.T.C.S. art. 4413(32). The Governor’s Committee on Aging is also described as a “state agency.” See Human Resources Code, S101.025(a). The Interagency Cooperation Act authorizes any state agency, including a department, to enter into written contracts with other agencies of the state. V.T.C.S. art. 4413(32), 53. The Department and the Committee have in fact entered into a contract to perform the services detailed inyour question. It has been approved by the State Purchasing and General Services Commission pursuant to section 4 of article 4413(32), V.T.C.S., in exercise of responsibilities transferred to it from the Board of Control pursuant to section 1101of article 601b,V.T.C.S., enacted by the 66th Legislature, Acts 1979,66th Leg., ch. 773, at 1908,1956.

P. 457Honorable Charles Evans - Page Two (MW-142)

Section 3 of the Interagency Cooperation Act authorizes contracts for furnishing
“necessary and authorized special or technical services, including the services of employees, the services of materials, or the services of equipment,” a broad grant of authority. The validity of an interagency agreement is for the State Purchasing and General Services Commission in the first instance. See Attorney General Opinion H-446 (1974). In reviewing administrative action, the courts apply an abuse of discretion standard. Railroad Commission v. Galveston Chamber of Commerce, 145S.W.573 (Tex. 1912). In view of the broad language describing the subject matter of interagency contracts, webelieve the action ofthe State Purchasing and General Services Commission in approving the contract isvalid. Your second question isasfollows: If employees of the Texas Department of Community Affairs whoare not employed under a merit system perform these services for the Governor’s Committee on Aging under an interagency contract, is the committee ineligible under federal law to receive federal funds for programs for older persons? The Governor’s Committee on Aging is the state agency designated to handle federal programs relating to the aging that require action within the state and that are not the specific responsibility ofanother state agency. Human Resources Code, 5101.025(a). The Federal Older Americans Act, 42 U.S.C. Sections 3001- 3037a, requires that the agency receiving federal funds under the Act operate under a state plan which provides for a merit system of personnel administration. 42 U.S.C. S3027(a)(4). Laws, rules, regulations, and policy statements effectuating such methods of personnel administration are part of the State plan, and are set out in 45 C.F.R. Part 1321. See 45 C.F.R. 51321.37(a). - Ifcertain portions ofthe State plan are to be administered by an agency other than the one designated for that purpose, the methods of administration required by federal regulation are still applicable. 45 C.F.R. 51321.35(b). Whenever the Commissioner of H.E.W.finds that there isafailure to comply substantially with any provision of the Older Americans Act in the administration of the state plan, he shall, after notice and an opportunity to beheard, stop federal funds. 45 C.F.R. §1321.20(a). Based on areading of these regulations, we conclude that the Committee incurs a risk of having federal funds cut off when it contracts to have administrative services performed by persons who are not employed under a merit system. Of course, any decision to interrupt funds is at the option of the federal government, and action may be taken only after the Committee is given notice and an opportunity to beheard. Wenote for your information that anopinion on the validity ofthis contract under federal law can be obtained from the Federal Office ofPersonnel Management.

P. 458Honorable Charles Evans - Page 3 (MW-142)

SUMMARY The Governor’s Committee on Aging has authority under state law to enter into a contract with the Texas Department of Community Affairs for the performance of administrative services. The performance of such services must be consistent with federal regulations in order to avoid interruption of federal funds to the committee.

MARKWHITE Attorney General ofTexas JOHNW.FAINTER, JR. First Assistant Attorney General TEDL.HARTLEY Executive Assistant Attorney General Prepared bySusanGarrison Assistant Attorney General APPROVED: OPINIONCOMMITTEE C.Robert Heath, Chairman Bill Campbell BobGammage Susan Garrison Rick Gilpin

P. 459