alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

Filed June 8, 2007

No. 04-7034

APCC SERVICES, INC., ET AL.,

APPELLEES

v.

SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS CO.,

APPELLANT

Consolidated with

04-7035

On Remand from the United States Supreme Court

Before: GINSBURG, Chief Judge, and SENTELLE and

RANDOLPH, Circuit Judges.

Opinion for the Court filed PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM: In APCC Services, Inc. v. Sprint

Communications Co., 418 F.3d 1238 (2005) (APCC), we

reversed the orders of the district court denying the defendants’

motion to dismiss. The Supreme Court granted the plaintiffs’

petition for a writ of certiorari to this court, vacated our

judgment, and remanded the case for further consideration in
2

light of Global Crossing Telecommunications, Inc. v.

Metrophones Telecommunications, Inc., 127 S. Ct. 1513 (2007).

We now affirm the orders of, and remand the case to, the district

court.

The facts of this case are set forth in our previous opinion.

APCC, 418 F.3d at 1241-42. In brief, APCC et al. are a

payphone service provider (PSP) and several “aggregators,”

intermediaries between PSPs and interexchange carriers (IXCs),

that sued several IXCs to obtain compensation they claim the

IXCs owe them pursuant to a regulation of the Federal

Communications Commission. The IXCs moved to dismiss on

the grounds that the aggregators did not have standing to sue and

the Communications Act of 1934, 47 U.S.C. § 151 et seq., did

not give the plaintiffs a private right of action to recover for a

violation of the regulation. The district court denied the

motions, concluding the aggregators had standing, APCC Servs.,

Inc. v. AT&T Corp., 281 F. Supp. 2d 41, 45 (2003), and that

§ 276 of the Act created a private right of action. APCC Servs.,

Inc. v. Cable & Wireless, Inc., 281 F. Supp. 2d 52, 54-57 (2003).

The district court also permitted the plaintiffs to amend their

complaint to assert that §§ 201(b), 407, and 416(c) of Title 47

provide alternate grounds for relief. Id. at 57-59. This court

reversed. The panel determined, over the dissent of Judge

Sentelle, that the aggregators had standing to sue and, over the

dissent of Chief Judge Ginsburg, that none of the provisions

cited gave the plaintiffs a right to sue in federal court; they were

remitted to filing a complaint for reparations before the FCC.

APCC, 418 F.3d at 1250.

 

The Supreme Court, however, held in Global Crossing that

a violation of the regulation at issue is a violation of § 201(b) of

the Act, for which a private right of action is authorized by

§ 207 of the Act, in effect creating a right of action to remedy a

violation of the regulation itself. 127 S. Ct. at 1516. It is now
3

clear, therefore, that APCC et al. may pursue their case in

district court under § 201(b). Accordingly, the orders of the

district court denying the motions to dismiss are affirmed, and

the case is remanded for further proceedings. 

So ordered.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED NOVEMBER 19, 2020

NO. 03

- 19

- 00311

- CR

Daniel Heredia, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 207TH DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES GOODWIN, TRIANA, AND SMITH

AF FIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE TRIANA

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction r en d ered by the trial court. Having reviewed

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that ther e was no reversible error in the

trial court’s judgment

. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment

. Because

appellant is indigent and u nable to pay costs, no adjudica t i on of costs is made.
AD Economic Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2011-0453 Directorate ID: 2008-SW-16-AD

Helicopter Model: Eurocopter Deutschland Model EC135 Helicopters

Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 20

Costs:

We estimate that it would take about 1⁄2 work-hour to copy and insert the synchronization procedure into 

the RFM. The average labor rate is $85 per hour. We estimate the cost of the AD on U.S. operators to be 

$850.

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No ()

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No ()

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

Yes ( ) No ()

Project Engineer: Eric Haight
** **

**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONPursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002**

I, James H. Perry, as Vice President, Chief Financial Officer andController of United Industrial Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, thatto my knowledge:

a.               the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the U.S.Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”) fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended; and

b.              the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of United Industrial Corporation.
| Date: August 9, 2007 |   | /s/ JAMES H. PERRY                                      |
|----------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------|
|                 |   | James H. Perry                                          |
|                 |   | Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and  Controller |

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to United Industrial Corporationand will be retained by United Industrial Corporation and furnished to theSecurities Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Theforegoing certification is being furnished pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350.  It is not being filed for purposesof Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and it is notto be incorporated by reference into any filing of the company, regardless ofany general incorporation language in such filing.

----
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 08-2052

WYMON GRIFFIN, 

 Plaintiff - Appellant, 

 v. 

PROFESSIONAL POLICE & SECURITY SERVICE; ALMAMY CONAKRY; FOOD 

LION, INCORPORATED, Store #635, 

 Defendants - Appellees. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert J. Conrad, 

Jr., Chief District Judge. (3:07-cv-00425-RJC-DCK) 

Submitted: March 12, 2009 Decided: March 16, 2009 

Before MOTZ and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Wymon Griffin, Appellant Pro Se. Walter Lewis Smith, Jr., 

ROBINSON, ELLIOTT & SMITH, Charlotte, North Carolina; Julie Lynn 

Bell, PATTERSON DILTHEY, LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina, for 

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

Wymon Griffin appeals the district court’s order 

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying 

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have 

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, 

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Griffin 

v. Professional Police & Security Serv., No. 3:07-cv-00425-RJCDCK (W.D.N.C. Aug. 21, 2008). We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
(Reap. Dec. 8287)

#### London Gramophone Corp. *v.*United States

Entry No. 866396.

*587(Decided February 4, 1954)

*Barnes, Richardson & Colburn*for the plaintiff.

*Warren E. Burger,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Chief Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the Acting Assistant Attorney General in Charge of Customs and the attorneys for the plaintiff, subject to the approval of the Court, that the merchandise covered by the above-entitled appeal to reappraisement consists of long-playing gramophone records imported from Great Britain.

> That the issues involved in the above-entitled appeal to reappraisement are similar in all material respects to the issues involved in *The United States*v. *International Expediters, Inc. (Winsor & Newton, Inc.),*Customs Appeal No. 4739, decided by the United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals January 14, 1953, 40 C. C. P. A. 148, C. A. D. 511.

> That on or about the date of exportation of the merchandise herein involved, such or similar merchandise was not freely offered for sale in the principal markets of Great Britain either for home consumption or for export to the United States; neither on the date of exportation was such or similar imported merchandise freely offered for sale in the principal market of the United States.

> That the cost of production, as such cost is defined in Section 402 (f) of the Tariff Act of 1930, for the long-playing records covered by the above-entitled appeal to reappraisement is as follows:

> 10-inch long-playing record_ 45.23d per record

> 12-inch long-playing record_ 55.42d per record

> That the record in *The United States*v. *International Expediters, Inc. (Winsor & Newton, Inc.),*Suit 4739, 40 C. C. P. A. 148, C. A. D. 511, be incorporated in the record in the above-entitled appeal to reappraisement and that such appeal is submitted on this stipulation.

On the agreed facts I find the cost of production, as that value is defined in section 402 (f) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values were as follows:

> 10-inch long-playing record_ 45.23d per record

> 12-inch long-playing record_ 55.42d per record

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
# Official Journal L 228I/2023

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 228I |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6615 September 2023 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 228I

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6615 September 2023

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/1779 of 15 September 2023 implementing Regulation (EU) No 359/2011 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Iran | 1 |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2023/1780 of 15 September 2023 implementing Decision 2011/235/CFSP concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities in view of the situation in Iran | 6 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/1779 of 15 September 2023 implementing Regulation (EU) No 359/2011 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Iran

1

DECISIONS

*

Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2023/1780 of 15 September 2023 implementing Decision 2011/235/CFSP concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities in view of the situation in Iran

6

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsA knowledge-based expert system for scheduling of airborne astronomical observationsThe Kuiper Airborne Observatory Scheduler (KAOS) is a knowledge-based expert system developed at NASA Ames Research Center to assist in route planning of a C-141 flying astronomical observatory. This program determines a sequence of flight legs that enables sequential observations of a set of heavenly bodies derived from a list of desirable objects. The possible flight legs are constrained by problems of observability, avoiding flyovers of warning and restricted military zones, and running out of fuel. A significant contribution of the KAOS program is that it couples computational capability with a reasoning system.Document ID19870010539Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsNachtsheim, P. R.*(NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA, United States)*Gevarter, W. B.*(NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA, United States)*Stutz, J. C.*(NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA, United States)*Banda, C. P.*(Informatics General Corp. Palo Alto, Calif., United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateDecember 1, 1985Subject CategoryComputer SystemsReport/Patent NumberA-86054NASA-TM-88194NAS 1.15:88194Accession Number87N19972Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 506-54-61Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19870010539.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
**Exhibit 31.2**
**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**
I, Charles T. Dickson, Chief Financial Officer of United Components, Inc.certify that:
1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of United Components,Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under whichsuch statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations andcash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented inthis report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared; b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal controls over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: November 12, 2004         By:  /s/ Charles T. Dickson   Name:  Charles T. Dickson   Title:  Chief Financial Officer
----

            COMMISSION DECISION         

of 13 July 2005         

amending the Decision 2002/191/EC declaring a concentration to be compatible with the common market and the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/M.2139 — Bombardier/ADtranz)

(notified under document number C(2005) 2683)

(Only the English text is authentic)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2005/907/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, and in particular Article 57 thereof,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89 of 21 December 1989 on the control of concentrations between undertakings (1), and in particular Article 8(2) thereof,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 of 20 January 2004 on the control of concentrations between undertakings (the EC Merger Regulation) (2), and in particular Article 26(2) thereof,

Having regard to the Commission Decision 2002/191/EC of 3 April 2001 declaring a concentration to be compatible with the common market and the functioning of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/M.2139 — Bombardier/ADtranz) (3),

After consulting the Advisory Committee on Concentrations (4),

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Article 2 of Decision 2002/191/EC is replaced by the following:

‘Article 2

Article 1 is subject to full compliance with the conditions set out in paragraphs 1(a), first subparagraph, 1(c), 1(d), 1(e), first and fourth subparagraphs, 1(f), 1(g), 1(h), and 1(i) of the Annex.’

Article 2

This decision shall be conditional on

Article 3

This decision is addressed to:

Done at Brussels, 13 July 2005.

For the Commission

Neelie KROES            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 395, 30.12.1989, p. 1. As corrected by OJ L 257, 21.9.1990, p. 13. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1310/97 (OJ L 180, 9.7.1997, p. 1).

(2)OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

(3)OJ L 69, 12.3.2002, p. 50.

(4)OJ C 321, 16.12.2005.

(5)  Not yet published in the Official Journal.

----
# Official Journal C 123A/16 A

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 123A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6316 April 2020 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 123A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6316 April 2020

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | Corrigenda |
| 2020/C 123 A/01 | Corrigendum to notice of open competitions – EPSO/AD/375/20 – Danish-language (DA) lawyer-linguists (AD 7) – EPSO/AD/376/20 – Greek-language (EL) lawyer-linguists (AD 7) – EPSO/AD/377/20 – French-language (FR) lawyer-linguists (AD 7) – EPSO/AD/378/20 – Croatian-language (HR) lawyer-linguists (AD 7) – EPSO/AD/379/20 – Polish-language (PL) lawyer-linguists (AD 7) ( OJ C 72 A, 5.3.2020 ) | 1 |

Contents

page

Corrigenda

2020/C 123 A/01

Corrigendum to notice of open competitions – EPSO/AD/375/20 – Danish-language (DA) lawyer-linguists (AD 7) – EPSO/AD/376/20 – Greek-language (EL) lawyer-linguists (AD 7) – EPSO/AD/377/20 – French-language (FR) lawyer-linguists (AD 7) – EPSO/AD/378/20 – Croatian-language (HR) lawyer-linguists (AD 7) – EPSO/AD/379/20 – Polish-language (PL) lawyer-linguists (AD 7) ( OJ C 72 A, 5.3.2020 )

( OJ C 72 A, 5.3.2020 )

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN

---

Corrigenda

| 16.4.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 123/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.4.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 123/1

---

Corrigendum to notice of open competitions – EPSO/AD/375/20 – Danish-language (DA) lawyer-linguists (AD 7) – EPSO/AD/376/20 – Greek-language (EL) lawyer-linguists (AD 7) – EPSO/AD/377/20 – French-language (FR) lawyer-linguists (AD 7) – EPSO/AD/378/20 – Croatian-language (HR) lawyer-linguists (AD 7) – EPSO/AD/379/20 – Polish-language (PL) lawyer-linguists (AD 7)

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 72 A of 5 March 2020
  )

(2020/C 123 A/01)

On page 1:

for:

‘Deadline for registration: 7 April 2020 at 12.00 (midday), Brussels time’,

read:

read:

‘Deadline for registration: 5 May 2020 at 12.00 (midday), Brussels time’.

On page 6:

for:

for:

‘Apply online on the EPSO website http://jobs.eu-careers.eu by:

7 April 2020 at 12.00 (midday), Brussels time.’,

read:

read:

‘Apply online on the EPSO website http://jobs.eu-careers.eu by:

5 May 2020 at 12.00 (midday), Brussels time.’.

---
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 76 (Friday, April 20, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 19980]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-7526]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COUNCIL ON THE ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES


Arts And Artifacts Indemnity Panel Advisory Committee; Notice of 
Meeting

    Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(Pub. L. 92-463 as amended) notice is hereby given that a meeting of 
the Arts and Artifacts Indemnity Panel of the Federal Council on the 
Arts and the Humanities will be held at 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., 
Washington, DC 20506, in Room 716, from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m., on Monday, 
May 7, 2007.
    The purpose of the meeting is to review applications for 
Certificates of Indemnity submitted to the Federal Council on the Arts 
and the Humanities for exhibitions beginning after January 1, 2007.
    Because the proposed meeting will consider financial and commercial 
data and because it is important to keep values of objects, methods of 
transportation and security measures confidential, pursuant to the 
authority granted me by the Chairman's Delegation of Authority to Close 
Advisory Committee Meetings, dated July 19, 1993, I have determined 
that the meeting would fall within exemption (4) of 5 U.S.C. 552(b) and 
that it is essential to close the meeting to protect the free exchange 
of views and to avoid interference with the operations of the 
committee.
    It is suggested that those desiring more specific information 
contact Acting Advisory Committee Management Officer, Heather Gottry, 
1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20506, or call 202-606-
8322.

Heather Gottry,
Acting Advisory Committee Management Officer.
 [FR Doc. E7-7526 Filed 4-19-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7536-01-P