```

[110th Congress Public Law 114]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ114.110]

[[Page 121 STAT. 1041]]

Public Law 110-114
110th Congress

                                 An Act

 
  To provide for the conservation and development of water and related 
 resources, to authorize the Secretary of the Army to construct various 
 projects for improvements to rivers and harbors of the United States, 
     and for other purposes. <<NOTE: Nov. 8, 2007 -  [H.R. 1495]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress <<NOTE: Water Resources Development 
Act of 2007. Inter-governmental relations. 33 USC 2201 
note.>> assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE; TABLE OF CONTENTS.

    (a) Short Title.--This Act may be cited as the ``Water Resources 
Development Act of 2007''.
    (b) Table of Contents.--The table of contents for this Act is as 
follows:

Sec. 1. Short title; table of contents.
Sec. 2. Definition of Secretary.

                    TITLE I--WATER RESOURCES PROJECTS

Sec. 1001. Project authorizations.
Sec. 1002. Small projects for flood damage reduction.
Sec. 1003. Small projects for emergency streambank protection.
Sec. 1004. Small projects for navigation.
Sec. 1005. Small projects for improvement of the quality of the 
           environment.
Sec. 1006. Small projects for aquatic ecosystem restoration.
Sec. 1007. Small projects for shoreline protection.
Sec. 1008. Small projects for snagging and sediment removal.
Sec. 1009. Small projects to prevent or mitigate damage caused by 
           navigation projects.
Sec. 1010. Small projects for aquatic plant control.

                      TITLE II--GENERAL PROVISIONS

Sec. 2001. Non-Federal contributions.
Sec. 2002. Funding to process permits.
Sec. 2003. Written agreement for water resources projects.
Sec. 2004. Compilation of laws.
Sec. 2005. Dredged material disposal.
Sec. 2006. Remote and subsistence harbors.
Sec. 2007. Use of other Federal funds.
Sec. 2008. Revision of project partnership agreement; cost sharing.
Sec. 2009. Expedited actions for emergency flood damage reduction.
Sec. 2010. Watershed and river basin assessments.
Sec. 2011. Tribal partnership program.
Sec. 2012. Wildfire firefighting.
Sec. 2013. Technical assistance.
Sec. 2014. Lakes program.
Sec. 2015. Cooperative agreements.
Sec. 2016. Training funds.
Sec. 2017. Access to water resource data.
Sec. 2018. Shore protection projects.
Sec. 2019. Ability to pay.
Sec. 2020. Aquatic ecosystem and estuary restoration.
Sec. 2021. Small flood damage reduction projects.
Sec. 2022. Small river and harbor improvement projects.
Sec. 2023. Protection of highways, bridge approaches, public works, and 
           nonprofit public services.

[[Page 121 STAT. 1042]]

Sec. 2024. Modification of projects for improvement of the quality of 
           the environment.
Sec. 2025. Remediation of abandoned mine sites.
Sec. 2026. Leasing authority.
Sec. 2027. Fiscal transparency report.
Sec. 2028. Support of Army civil works program.
Sec. 2029. Sense of Congress on criteria for operation and maintenance 
           of harbor dredging projects.
Sec. 2030. Interagency and international support authority.
Sec. 2031. Water resources principles and guidelines.
Sec. 2032. Water resource priorities report.
Sec. 2033. Planning.
Sec. 2034. Independent peer review.
Sec. 2035. Safety assurance review.
Sec. 2036. Mitigation for fish and wildlife and wetlands losses.
Sec. 2037. Regional sediment management.
Sec. 2038. National shoreline erosion control development program.
Sec. 2039. Monitoring ecosystem restoration.
Sec. 2040. Electronic submission of permit applications.
Sec. 2041. Project administration.
Sec. 2042. Program administration.
Sec. 2043. Studies and reports for water resources projects.
Sec. 2044. Coordination and scheduling of Federal, State, and local 
           actions.
Sec. 2045. Project streamlining.
Sec. 2046. Project deauthorization.
Sec. 2047. Federal hopper dredges.

                  TITLE III--PROJECT-RELATED PROVISIONS

Sec. 3001. Black Warrior-Tombigbee Rivers, Alabama.
Sec. 3002. Cook Inlet, Alaska.
Sec. 3003. King Cove Harbor, Alaska.
Sec. 3004. Seward Harbor, Alaska.
Sec. 3005. Sitka, Alaska.
Sec. 3006. Tatitlek, Alaska.
Sec. 3007. Rio De Flag, Flagstaff, Arizona.
Sec. 3008. Nogales Wash and tributaries flood control project, Arizona.
Sec. 3009. Tucson drainage area, Arizona.
Sec. 3010. Osceola Harbor, Arkansas.
Sec. 3011. St. Francis River Basin, Arkansas and Missouri.
Sec. 3012. Pine Mountain Dam, Arkansas.
Sec. 3013. Red-Ouachita River Basin Levees, Arkansas and Louisiana.
Sec. 3014. Cache Creek Basin, California.
Sec. 3015. CALFED stability program, California.
Sec. 3016. Compton Creek, California.
Sec. 3017. Grayson Creek/Murderer's Creek, California.
Sec. 3018. Hamilton Airfield, California.
Sec. 3019. John F. Baldwin Ship Channel and Stockton Ship Channel, 
           California.
Sec. 3020. Kaweah River, California.
Sec. 3021. Larkspur Ferry Channel, Larkspur, California.
Sec. 3022. Llagas Creek, California.
Sec. 3023. Magpie Creek, California.
Sec. 3024. Pacific Flyway Center, Sacramento, California.
Sec. 3025. Petaluma River, Petaluma, California.
Sec. 3026. Pinole Creek, California.
Sec. 3027. Prado Dam, California.
Sec. 3028. Redwood City Navigation Channel, California.
Sec. 3029. Sacramento and American Rivers flood control, California.
Sec. 3030. Sacramento Deep Water Ship Channel, California.
Sec. 3031. Sacramento River bank protection, California.
Sec. 3032. Salton Sea restoration, California.
Sec. 3033. Santa Ana River Mainstem, California.
Sec. 3034. Santa Barbara Streams, Lower Mission Creek, California.
Sec. 3035. Santa Cruz Harbor, California.
Sec. 3036. Seven Oaks Dam, California.
Sec. 3037. Upper Guadalupe River, California.
Sec. 3038. Walnut Creek Channel, California.
Sec. 3039. Wildcat/San Pablo Creek Phase I, California.
Sec. 3040. Wildcat/San Pablo Creek Phase II, California.
Sec. 3041. Yuba River Basin project, California.
Sec. 3042. South Platte River basin, Colorado.
Sec. 3043. Intracoastal Waterway, Delaware River to Chesapeake Bay, 
           Delaware and Maryland.

[[Page 121 STAT. 1043]]

Sec. 3044. St. George's Bridge, Delaware.
Sec. 3045. Brevard County, Florida.
Sec. 3046. Broward County and Hillsboro Inlet, Florida.
Sec. 3047. Canaveral Harbor, Florida.
Sec. 3048. Gasparilla and Estero Islands, Florida.
Sec. 3049. Lido Key Beach, Sarasota, Florida.
Sec. 3050. Peanut Island, Florida.
Sec. 3051. Port Sutton, Florida.
Sec. 3052. Tampa Harbor-Big Bend Channel, Florida.
Sec. 3053. Tampa Harbor Cut B, Florida.
Sec. 3054. Allatoona Lake, Georgia.
Sec. 3055. Latham River, Glynn County, Georgia.
Sec. 3056. Dworshak Reservoir improvements, Idaho.
Sec. 3057. Little Wood River, Gooding, Idaho.
Sec. 3058. Beardstown Community Boat Harbor, Beardstown, Illinois.
Sec. 3059. Cache River Levee, Illinois.
Sec. 3060. Chicago River, Illinois.
Sec. 3061. Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal dispersal barriers project, 
           Illinois.
Sec. 3062. Emiquon, Illinois.
Sec. 3063. Lasalle, Illinois.
Sec. 3064. Spunky Bottoms, Illinois.
Sec. 3065. Cedar Lake, Indiana.
Sec. 3066. Koontz Lake, Indiana.
Sec. 3067. White River, Indiana.
Sec. 3068. Des Moines River and Greenbelt, Iowa.
Sec. 3069. Perry Creek, Iowa.
Sec. 3070. Rathbun Lake, Iowa.
Sec. 3071. Hickman Bluff stabilization, Kentucky.
Sec. 3072. Mcalpine Lock and Dam, Kentucky and Indiana.
Sec. 3073. Prestonsburg, Kentucky.
Sec. 3074. Amite River and tributaries, Louisiana, East Baton Rouge 
           Parish Watershed.
Sec. 3075. Atchafalaya Basin Floodway System, Louisiana.
Sec. 3076. Atchafalaya Basin Floodway System, regional visitor center, 
           Louisiana.
Sec. 3077. Atchafalaya River and Bayous Chene, Boeuf, and Black, 
           Louisiana.
Sec. 3078. Bayou Plaquemine, Louisiana.
Sec. 3079. Calcasieu River and Pass, Louisiana.
Sec. 3080. Red River (J. Bennett Johnston) Waterway, Louisiana.
Sec. 3081. Mississippi Delta Region, Louisiana.
Sec. 3082. Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet relocation assistance, 
           Louisiana.
Sec. 3083. Violet, Louisiana.
Sec. 3084. West bank of the Mississippi River (East of Harvey Canal), 
           Louisiana.
Sec. 3085. Camp Ellis, Saco, Maine.
Sec. 3086. Cumberland, Maryland.
Sec. 3087. Poplar Island, Maryland.
Sec. 3088. Detroit River shoreline, Detroit, Michigan.
Sec. 3089. St. Clair River and Lake St. Clair, Michigan.
Sec. 3090. St. Joseph Harbor, Michigan.
Sec. 3091. Sault Sainte Marie, Michigan.
Sec. 3092. Ada, Minnesota.
Sec. 3093. Duluth Harbor, McQuade Road, Minnesota.
Sec. 3094. Grand Marais, Minnesota.
Sec. 3095. Grand Portage Harbor, Minnesota.
Sec. 3096. Granite Falls, Minnesota.
Sec. 3097. Knife River Harbor, Minnesota.
Sec. 3098. Red Lake River, Minnesota.
Sec. 3099. Silver Bay, Minnesota.
Sec. 3100. Taconite Harbor, Minnesota.
Sec. 3101. Two Harbors, Minnesota.
Sec. 3102. Deer Island, Harrison County, Mississippi.
Sec. 3103. Jackson County, Mississippi.
Sec. 3104. Pearl River Basin, Mississippi.
Sec. 3105. Festus and Crystal City, Missouri.
Sec. 3106. L-15 levee, Missouri.
Sec. 3107. Monarch-Chesterfield, Missouri.
Sec. 3108. River Des Peres, Missouri.
Sec. 3109. Lower Yellowstone project, Montana.
Sec. 3110. Yellowstone River and tributaries, Montana and North Dakota.
Sec. 3111. Antelope Creek, Lincoln, Nebraska.
Sec. 3112. Sand Creek watershed, Wahoo, Nebraska.
Sec. 3113. Western Sarpy and Clear Creek, Nebraska.
Sec. 3114. Lower Truckee River, McCarran Ranch, Nevada.

[[Page 121 STAT. 1044]]

Sec. 3115. Lower Cape May Meadows, Cape May Point, New Jersey.
Sec. 3116. Passaic River basin flood management, New Jersey.
Sec. 3117. Cooperative agreements, New Mexico.
Sec. 3118. Middle Rio Grande restoration, New Mexico.
Sec. 3119. Buffalo Harbor, New York.
Sec. 3120. Long Island Sound oyster restoration, New York and 
           Connecticut.
Sec. 3121. Mamaroneck and Sheldrake Rivers watershed management, New 
           York.
Sec. 3122. Orchard Beach, Bronx, New York.
Sec. 3123. Port of New York and New Jersey, New York and New Jersey.
Sec. 3124. New York State Canal System.
Sec. 3125. Susquehanna River and Upper Delaware River watershed 
           management, New York.
Sec. 3126. Missouri River restoration, North Dakota.
Sec. 3127. Wahpeton, North Dakota.
Sec. 3128. Ohio.
Sec. 3129. Lower Girard Lake Dam, Girard, Ohio.
Sec. 3130. Mahoning River, Ohio.
Sec. 3131. Arcadia Lake, Oklahoma.
Sec. 3132. Arkansas River Corridor, Oklahoma.
Sec. 3133. Lake Eufaula, Oklahoma.
Sec. 3134. Oklahoma lakes demonstration program, Oklahoma.
Sec. 3135. Ottawa County, Oklahoma.
Sec. 3136. Red River chloride control, Oklahoma and Texas.
Sec. 3137. Waurika Lake, Oklahoma.
Sec. 3138. Upper Willamette River watershed ecosystem restoration, 
           Oregon.
Sec. 3139. Delaware River, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and Delaware.
Sec. 3140. Raystown Lake, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 3141. Sheraden Park Stream and Chartiers Creek, Allegheny County, 
           Pennsylvania.
Sec. 3142. Solomon's Creek, Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 3143. South Central Pennsylvania.
Sec. 3144. Wyoming Valley, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 3145. Narragansett Bay, Rhode Island.
Sec. 3146. Missouri River Restoration, South Dakota.
Sec. 3147. Cedar Bayou, Texas.
Sec. 3148. Freeport Harbor, Texas.
Sec. 3149. Lake Kemp, Texas.
Sec. 3150. Lower Rio Grande Basin, Texas.
Sec. 3151. North Padre Island, Corpus Christi Bay, Texas.
Sec. 3152. Pat Mayse Lake, Texas.
Sec. 3153. Proctor Lake, Texas.
Sec. 3154. San Antonio Channel, San Antonio, Texas.
Sec. 3155. Connecticut River restoration, Vermont.
Sec. 3156. Dam remediation, Vermont.
Sec. 3157. Lake Champlain Eurasian milfoil, water chestnut, and other 
           nonnative plant control, Vermont.
Sec. 3158. Upper Connecticut River Basin wetland restoration, Vermont 
           and New Hampshire.
Sec. 3159. Upper Connecticut River basin ecosystem restoration, Vermont 
           and New Hampshire.
Sec. 3160. Lake Champlain watershed, Vermont and New York.
Sec. 3161. Sandbridge Beach, Virginia Beach, Virginia.
Sec. 3162. Tangier Island Seawall, Virginia.
Sec. 3163. Duwamish/Green, Washington.
Sec. 3164. McNary Lock and Dam, McNary National Wildlife Refuge, 
           Washington and Idaho.
Sec. 3165. Snake River project, Washington and Idaho.
Sec. 3166. Yakima River, Port of Sunnyside, Washington.
Sec. 3167. Bluestone Lake, Ohio River Basin, West Virginia.
Sec. 3168. Greenbrier River basin, West Virginia.
Sec. 3169. Lesage/Greenbottom Swamp, West Virginia.
Sec. 3170. Lower Mud River, Milton, West Virginia.
Sec. 3171. Mcdowell County, West Virginia.
Sec. 3172. Parkersburg, West Virginia.
Sec. 3173. Green Bay Harbor, Green Bay, Wisconsin.
Sec. 3174. Manitowoc Harbor, Wisconsin.
Sec. 3175. Mississippi River headwaters reservoirs.
Sec. 3176. Upper basin of Missouri River.
Sec. 3177. Upper Mississippi River System environmental management 
           program.
Sec. 3178. Upper Ohio River and Tributaries navigation system new 
           technology pilot program.
Sec. 3179. Continuation of project authorizations.

[[Page 121 STAT. 1045]]

Sec. 3180. Project reauthorizations.
Sec. 3181. Project deauthorizations.
Sec. 3182. Land conveyances.
Sec. 3183. Extinguishment of reversionary interests and use 
           restrictions.

                            TITLE IV--STUDIES

Sec. 4001. John Glenn Great Lakes Basin Program.
Sec. 4002. Lake Erie dredged material disposal sites.
Sec. 4003. Southwestern United States drought study.
Sec. 4004. Delaware River.
Sec. 4005. Eurasian milfoil.
Sec. 4006. Fire Island, Alaska.
Sec. 4007. Knik Arm, Cook Inlet, Alaska.
Sec. 4008. Kuskokwim River, Alaska.
Sec. 4009. Nome Harbor, Alaska.
Sec. 4010. St. George Harbor, Alaska.
Sec. 4011. Susitna River, Alaska.
Sec. 4012. Valdez, Alaska.
Sec. 4013. Gila Bend, Maricopa, Arizona.
Sec. 4014. Searcy County, Arkansas.
Sec. 4015. Aliso Creek, California.
Sec. 4016. Fresno, Kings, and Kern counties, California.
Sec. 4017. Fruitvale Avenue Railroad Bridge, Alameda, California.
Sec. 4018. Los Angeles River revitalization study, California.
Sec. 4019. Lytle Creek, Rialto, California.
Sec. 4020. Mokelumne River, San Joaquin County, California.
Sec. 4021. Orick, California.
Sec. 4022. Shoreline study, Oceanside, California.
Sec. 4023. Rialto, Fontana, and Colton, California.
Sec. 4024. Sacramento River, California.
Sec. 4025. San Diego County, California.
Sec. 4026. San Francisco Bay, Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, California.
Sec. 4027. South San Francisco Bay Shoreline, California.
Sec. 4028. Twentynine Palms, California.
Sec. 4029. Yucca Valley, California.
Sec. 4030. Selenium studies, Colorado.
Sec. 4031. Delaware and Christina Rivers and Shellpot Creek, Wilmington, 
           Delaware.
Sec. 4032. Delaware inland bays and tributaries and Atlantic coast, 
           Delaware.
Sec. 4033. Collier County Beaches, Florida.
Sec. 4034. Lower St. Johns River, Florida.
Sec. 4035. Herbert Hoover Dike supplemental major rehabilitation report, 
           Florida.
Sec. 4036. Vanderbilt Beach Lagoon, Florida.
Sec. 4037. Meriwether County, Georgia.
Sec. 4038. Boise River, Idaho.
Sec. 4039. Ballard's Island Side Channel, Illinois.
Sec. 4040. Chicago, Illinois.
Sec. 4041. Salem, Indiana.
Sec. 4042. Buckhorn Lake, Kentucky.
Sec. 4043. Dewey Lake, Kentucky.
Sec. 4044. Louisville, Kentucky.
Sec. 4045. Vidalia Port, Louisiana.
Sec. 4046. Fall River Harbor, Massachusetts and Rhode Island.
Sec. 4047. Clinton River, Michigan.
Sec. 4048. Hamburg and Green Oak Townships, Michigan.
Sec. 4049. Lake Erie at Luna Pier, Michigan.
Sec. 4050. Duluth-Superior Harbor, Minnesota and Wisconsin.
Sec. 4051. Northeast Mississippi.
Sec. 4052. Dredged material disposal, New Jersey.
Sec. 4053. Bayonne, New Jersey.
Sec. 4054. Carteret, New Jersey.
Sec. 4055. Gloucester County, New Jersey.
Sec. 4056. Perth Amboy, New Jersey.
Sec. 4057. Batavia, New York.
Sec. 4058. Big Sister Creek, Evans, New York.
Sec. 4059. Finger Lakes, New York.
Sec. 4060. Lake Erie Shoreline, Buffalo, New York.
Sec. 4061. Newtown Creek, New York.
Sec. 4062. Niagara River, New York.
Sec. 4063. Shore Parkway Greenway, Brooklyn, New York.
Sec. 4064. Upper Delaware River watershed, New York.

[[Page 121 STAT. 1046]]

Sec. 4065. Lincoln County, North Carolina.
Sec. 4066. Wilkes County, North Carolina.
Sec. 4067. Yadkinville, North Carolina.
Sec. 4068. Flood damage reduction, Ohio.
Sec. 4069. Lake Erie, Ohio.
Sec. 4070. Ohio River, Ohio.
Sec. 4071. Toledo Harbor dredged material placement, Toledo, Ohio.
Sec. 4072. Toledo Harbor, Maumee River, and Lake Channel project, 
           Toledo, Ohio.
Sec. 4073. Ecosystem restoration and fish passage improvements, Oregon.
Sec. 4074. Walla Walla River basin, Oregon.
Sec. 4075. Chartiers Creek watershed, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 4076. Kinzua Dam and Allegheny Reservoir, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 4077. Western Pennsylvania flood damage reduction.
Sec. 4078. Williamsport, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 4079. Yardley Borough, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 4080. Rio Valenciano, Juncos, Puerto Rico.
Sec. 4081. Woonsocket local protection project, Blackstone River basin, 
           Rhode Island.
Sec. 4082. Crooked Creek, Bennettsville, South Carolina.
Sec. 4083. Broad River, York County, South Carolina.
Sec. 4084. Savannah River, South Carolina and Georgia.
Sec. 4085. Chattanooga, Tennessee.
Sec. 4086. Cleveland, Tennessee.
Sec. 4087. Cumberland River, Nashville, Tennessee.
Sec. 4088. Lewis, Lawrence, and Wayne Counties, Tennessee.
Sec. 4089. Wolf River and Nonconnah Creek, Memphis, Tennessee.
Sec. 4090. Abilene, Texas.
Sec. 4091. Coastal Texas ecosystem protection and restoration, Texas.
Sec. 4092. Port of Galveston, Texas.
Sec. 4093. Grand County and Moab, Utah.
Sec. 4094. Southwestern Utah.
Sec. 4095. Ecosystem and hydropower generation dams, Vermont.
Sec. 4096. Elliott Bay Seawall, Seattle, Washington.
Sec. 4097. Monongahela River Basin, Northern West Virginia.
Sec. 4098. Kenosha Harbor, Wisconsin.
Sec. 4099. Johnsonville Dam, Johnsonville, Wisconsin.
Sec. 4100. Wauwatosa, Wisconsin.
Sec. 4101. Debris removal.

                         TITLE V--MISCELLANEOUS

Sec. 5001. Maintenance of navigation channels.
Sec. 5002. Watershed management.
Sec. 5003. Dam safety.
Sec. 5004. Structural integrity evaluations.
Sec. 5005. Flood mitigation priority areas.
Sec. 5006. Additional assistance for authorized projects.
Sec. 5007. Expedited completion of reports and construction for certain 
           projects.
Sec. 5008. Expedited completion of reports for certain projects.
Sec. 5009. Southeastern water resources assessment.
Sec. 5010. Missouri and Middle Mississippi Rivers enhancement project.
Sec. 5011. Great Lakes fishery and ecosystem restoration program.
Sec. 5012. Great Lakes remedial action plans and sediment remediation.
Sec. 5013. Great Lakes tributary models.
Sec. 5014. Great Lakes navigation and protection.
Sec. 5015. Saint Lawrence Seaway.
Sec. 5016. Upper Mississippi River dispersal barrier project.
Sec. 5017. Estuary restoration.
Sec. 5018. Missouri River and tributaries, mitigation, recovery, and 
           restoration, Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, North 
           Dakota, South Dakota, and Wyoming.
Sec. 5019. Susquehanna, Delaware, and Potomac River basins, Delaware, 
           Maryland, Pennsylvania, and Virginia.
Sec. 5020. Chesapeake Bay environmental restoration and protection 
           program.
Sec. 5021. Chesapeake Bay oyster restoration, Virginia and Maryland.
Sec. 5022. Hypoxia assessment.
Sec. 5023. Potomac River watershed assessment and tributary strategy 
           evaluation and monitoring program.
Sec. 5024. Lock and dam security.
Sec. 5025. Research and development program for Columbia and Snake River 
           salmon survival.
Sec. 5026. Wage surveys.

[[Page 121 STAT. 1047]]

Sec. 5027. Rehabilitation.
Sec. 5028. Auburn, Alabama.
Sec. 5029. Pinhook Creek, Huntsville, Alabama.
Sec. 5030. Alaska.
Sec. 5031. Barrow, Alaska.
Sec. 5032. Lowell Creek Tunnel, Seward, Alaska.
Sec. 5033. St. Herman and St. Paul Harbors, Kodiak, Alaska.
Sec. 5034. Tanana River, Alaska.
Sec. 5035. Wrangell Harbor, Alaska.
Sec. 5036. Augusta and Clarendon, Arkansas.
Sec. 5037. Des Arc levee protection, Arkansas.
Sec. 5038. Loomis Landing, Arkansas.
Sec. 5039. California.
Sec. 5040. Calaveras River and Littlejohn Creek and tributaries, 
           Stockton, California.
Sec. 5041. Cambria, California.
Sec. 5042. Contra Costa Canal, Oakley and Knightsen, California; Mallard 
           Slough, Pittsburg, California.
Sec. 5043. Dana Point Harbor, California.
Sec. 5044. East San Joaquin County, California.
Sec. 5045. Eastern Santa Clara basin, California.
Sec. 5046. LA-3 dredged material ocean disposal site designation, 
           California.
Sec. 5047. Lancaster, California.
Sec. 5048. Los Osos, California.
Sec. 5049. Pine Flat Dam fish and wildlife habitat, California.
Sec. 5050. Raymond Basin, Six Basins, Chino Basin, and San Gabriel 
           Basin, California.
Sec. 5051. San Francisco, California.
Sec. 5052. San Francisco, California, waterfront area.
Sec. 5053. San Pablo Bay, California, watershed and Suisun Marsh 
           ecosystem restoration.
Sec. 5054. St. Helena, California.
Sec. 5055. Upper Calaveras River, Stockton, California.
Sec. 5056. Rio Grande environmental management program, Colorado, New 
           Mexico, and Texas.
Sec. 5057. Charles Hervey Townshend Breakwater, New Haven Harbor, 
           Connecticut.
Sec. 5058. Stamford, Connecticut.
Sec. 5059. Delmarva conservation corridor, Delaware, Maryland, and 
           Virginia.
Sec. 5060. Anacostia River, District of Columbia and Maryland.
Sec. 5061. East Central and Northeast Florida.
Sec. 5062. Florida Keys water quality improvements.
Sec. 5063. Lake Worth, Florida.
Sec. 5064. Big Creek, Georgia, watershed management and restoration 
           program.
Sec. 5065. Metropolitan North Georgia Water Planning District.
Sec. 5066. Savannah, Georgia.
Sec. 5067. Idaho, Montana, rural Nevada, New Mexico, rural Utah, and 
           Wyoming.
Sec. 5068. Riley Creek Recreation Area, Idaho.
Sec. 5069. Floodplain mapping, Little Calumet River, Chicago, Illinois.
Sec. 5070. Reconstruction of Illinois and Missouri flood protection 
           projects.
Sec. 5071. Illinois River basin restoration.
Sec. 5072. Promontory Point third-party review, Chicago shoreline, 
           Chicago, Illinois.
Sec. 5073. Kaskaskia River basin, Illinois, restoration.
Sec. 5074. Southwest Illinois.
Sec. 5075. Calumet region, Indiana.
Sec. 5076. Floodplain mapping, Missouri River, Iowa.
Sec. 5077. Paducah, Kentucky.
Sec. 5078. Southern and eastern Kentucky.
Sec. 5079. Winchester, Kentucky.
Sec. 5080. Baton Rouge, Louisiana.
Sec. 5081. Calcasieu Ship Channel, Louisiana.
Sec. 5082. East Atchafalaya basin and Amite River basin region, 
           Louisiana.
Sec. 5083. Inner Harbor Navigation Canal Lock project, Louisiana.
Sec. 5084. Lake Pontchartrain, Louisiana.
Sec. 5085. Southeast Louisiana region, Louisiana.
Sec. 5086. West Baton Rouge Parish, Louisiana.
Sec. 5087. Charlestown, Maryland.
Sec. 5088. St. Mary's River, Maryland.
Sec. 5089. Massachusetts dredged material disposal sites.
Sec. 5090. Ontonagon Harbor, Michigan.
Sec. 5091. Crookston, Minnesota.

[[Page 121 STAT. 1048]]

Sec. 5092. Garrison and Kathio Township, Minnesota.
Sec. 5093. Itasca County, Minnesota.
Sec. 5094. Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Sec. 5095. Northeastern Minnesota.
Sec. 5096. Wild Rice River, Minnesota.
Sec. 5097. Mississippi.
Sec. 5098. Harrison, Hancock, and Jackson Counties, Mississippi.
Sec. 5099. Mississippi River, Missouri and Illinois.
Sec. 5100. St. Louis, Missouri.
Sec. 5101. St. Louis Regional Greenways, St. Louis, Missouri.
Sec. 5102. Missoula, Montana.
Sec. 5103. St. Mary project, Glacier County, Montana.
Sec. 5104. Lower Platte River watershed restoration, Nebraska.
Sec. 5105. Hackensack Meadowlands area, New Jersey.
Sec. 5106. Atlantic Coast of New York.
Sec. 5107. College Point, New York City, New York.
Sec. 5108. Flushing Bay and Creek, New York City, New York.
Sec. 5109. Hudson River, New York.
Sec. 5110. Mount Morris Dam, New York.
Sec. 5111. North Hempstead and Glen Cove North Shore watershed 
           restoration, New York.
Sec. 5112. Rochester, New York.
Sec. 5113. North Carolina.
Sec. 5114. Stanly County, North Carolina.
Sec. 5115. John H. Kerr Dam and Reservoir, North Carolina.
Sec. 5116. Cincinnati, Ohio.
Sec. 5117. Ohio River basin environmental management.
Sec. 5118. Toussaint River navigation project, Carroll Township, Ohio.
Sec. 5119. Statewide comprehensive water planning, Oklahoma.
Sec. 5120. Fern Ridge Dam, Oregon.
Sec. 5121. Allegheny County, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 5122. Clinton County, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 5123. Kehly Run Dams, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 5124. Lehigh River, Lehigh County, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 5125. Northeast Pennsylvania.
Sec. 5126. Upper Susquehanna River basin, Pennsylvania and New York.
Sec. 5127. Cano Martin Pena, San Juan, Puerto Rico.
Sec. 5128. Lakes Marion and Moultrie, South Carolina.
Sec. 5129. Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe, Lower Brule Sioux Tribe, and 
           terrestrial wildlife habitat restoration, South Dakota.
Sec. 5130. East Tennessee.
Sec. 5131. Fritz Landing, Tennessee.
Sec. 5132. J. Percy Priest Dam and Reservoir, Tennessee.
Sec. 5133. Nashville, Tennessee.
Sec. 5134. Nonconnah Weir, Memphis, Tennessee.
Sec. 5135. Tennessee River partnership.
Sec. 5136. Town Creek, Lenoir City, Tennessee.
Sec. 5137. Upper Mississippi embayment, Tennessee, Arkansas, and 
           Mississippi.
Sec. 5138. Texas.
Sec. 5139. Bosque River watershed, Texas.
Sec. 5140. Dallas County region, Texas.
Sec. 5141. Dallas Floodway, Dallas, Texas.
Sec. 5142. Harris County, Texas.
Sec. 5143. Johnson Creek, Arlington, Texas.
Sec. 5144. Onion Creek, Texas.
Sec. 5145. Connecticut River dams, Vermont.
Sec. 5146. Lake Champlain Canal, Vermont and New York.
Sec. 5147. Dyke Marsh, Fairfax County, Virginia.
Sec. 5148. Eastern Shore and Southwest Virginia.
Sec. 5149. James River, Virginia.
Sec. 5150. Baker Bay and Ilwaco Harbor, Washington.
Sec. 5151. Hamilton Island campground, Washington.
Sec. 5152. Erosion control, Puget Island, Wahkiakum County, Washington.
Sec. 5153. Willapa Bay, Washington.
Sec. 5154. West Virginia and Pennsylvania flood control.
Sec. 5155. Central West Virginia.
Sec. 5156. Southern West Virginia.
Sec. 5157. Construction of flood control projects by non-Federal 
           interests.
Sec. 5158. Additional assistance for critical projects.

                      TITLE VI--FLORIDA EVERGLADES

Sec. 6001. Hillsboro and Okeechobee Aquifer, Florida.

[[Page 121 STAT. 1049]]

Sec. 6002. Pilot projects.
Sec. 6003. Maximum costs.
Sec. 6004. Credit.
Sec. 6005. Outreach and assistance.
Sec. 6006. Critical restoration projects.
Sec. 6007. Regional engineering model for environmental restoration.

                    TITLE VII--LOUISIANA COASTAL AREA

Sec. 7001. Definitions.
Sec. 7002. Comprehensive plan.
Sec. 7003. Louisiana coastal area.
Sec. 7004. Coastal Louisiana Ecosystem Protection and Restoration Task 
           Force.
Sec. 7005. Project modifications.
Sec. 7006. Construction.
Sec. 7007. Non-Federal cost share.
Sec. 7008. Project justification.
Sec. 7009. Independent review.
Sec. 7010. Expedited reports.
Sec. 7011. Reporting.
Sec. 7012. New Orleans and vicinity.
Sec. 7013. Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet.
Sec. 7014. Hurricane and storm damage reduction.
Sec. 7015. Larose to Golden Meadow.
Sec. 7016. Lower Jefferson Parish, Louisiana.

    TITLE VIII--UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND ILLINOIS WATER-WAY SYSTEM

Sec. 8001. Definitions.
Sec. 8002. Navigation improvements and restoration.
Sec. 8003. Authorization of construction of navigation improvements.
Sec. 8004. Ecosystem restoration authorization.
Sec. 8005. Comparable progress.

                 TITLE IX--NATIONAL LEVEE SAFETY PROGRAM

Sec. 9001. Short title.
Sec. 9002. Definitions.
Sec. 9003. Committee on Levee Safety.
Sec. 9004. Inventory and inspection of levees.
Sec. 9005. Limitations on statutory construction.
Sec. 9006. Authorization of appropriations.

SEC. 2. <<NOTE: 33 USC 2201 note.>> DEFINITION OF SECRETARY.

    In this Act, the term ``Secretary'' means the Secretary of the Army.

TITLE <<NOTE: Studies.>> I--WATER RESOURCES PROJECTS
SEC. 1001. PROJECT AUTHORIZATIONS.

    Except as otherwise provided in this section, the following projects 
for water resources development and conservation and other purposes are 
authorized to be carried out by the Secretary substantially in 
accordance with the plans, and subject to the conditions, described in 
the respective reports designated in this section:
            (1) Haines, alaska.--The project for navigation, Haines, 
        Alaska: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated December 20, 
        2004, at a total cost of $14,040,000, with an estimated Federal 
        cost of $11,232,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
        $2,808,000.
            (2) Port lions, alaska.--The project for navigation, Port 
        Lions, Alaska: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated June 14, 
        2006, at a total cost of $9,530,000, with an estimated Federal 
        cost of $7,624,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
        $1,906,000.

[[Page 121 STAT. 1050]]

            (3) Santa cruz river, paseo de las iglesias, arizona.--The 
        project for environmental restoration, Santa Cruz River, Pima 
        County, Arizona: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated March 
        28, 2006, at a total cost of $97,700,000, with an estimated 
        Federal cost of $63,300,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
        $34,400,000.
            (4) Tanque verde creek, pima county, arizona.--The project 
        for environmental restoration, Tanque Verde Creek, Pima County, 
        Arizona: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated July 22, 2003, 
        at a total cost of $5,906,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
        $3,836,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $2,070,000.
            (5) Salt river (rio salado oeste), maricopa county, 
        arizona.--The project for environmental restoration, Salt River 
        (Rio Salado Oeste), Maricopa County, Arizona: Report of the 
        Chief of Engineers dated December 19, 2006, at a total cost of 
        $166,650,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $106,629,000 and 
        an estimated non-Federal cost of $60,021,000.
            (6) Salt river (va shly'ay akimel), maricopa county, 
        arizona.--
                    (A) In general.--The project for environmental 
                restoration, Salt River (Va Shly'ay Akimel), Arizona: 
                Report of the Chief of Engineers dated January 3, 2005, 
                at a total cost of $162,100,000, with an estimated 
                Federal cost of $105,200,000 and an estimated non-
                Federal cost of $56,900,000.
                    (B) Coordination with federal reclamation 
                projects.--The Secretary, to the maximum extent 
                practicable, shall coordinate the design and 
                construction of the project described in subparagraph 
                (A) with the Bureau of Reclamation and any operating 
                agent for any Federal reclamation project in the Salt 
                River Basin to avoid impacts to existing Federal 
                reclamation facilities and operations in the Salt River 
                Basin.
            (7) May branch, fort smith, arkansas.--The project for flood 
        damage reduction, May Branch, Fort Smith, Arkansas: Report of 
        the Chief of Engineers dated December 19, 2006, at a total cost 
        of $30,850,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $15,010,000 
        and an estimated non-Federal cost of $15,840,000.
            (8) Hamilton city, glenn county, california.--The project 
        for flood damage reduction and environmental restoration, 
        Hamilton City, Glenn County, California: Report of the Chief of 
        Engineers dated December 22, 2004, at a total cost of 
        $52,400,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $34,100,000 and 
        estimated non-Federal cost of $18,300,000.
            (9) Silver strand shoreline, imperial beach, california.--
        The project for storm damage reduction, Silver Strand Shoreline, 
        Imperial Beach, California: Report of the Chief of Engineers 
        dated December 30, 2003, at a total cost of $13,700,000, with an 
        estimated Federal cost of $8,521,000 and an estimated non-
        Federal cost of $5,179,000, and at an estimated total cost of 
        $42,500,000 for periodic beach nourishment over the 50-year life 
        of the project, with an estimated Federal cost of $21,250,000 
        and an estimated non-Federal cost of $21,250,000.

[[Page 121 STAT. 1051]]

            (10) Matilija dam, ventura county, california.--The project 
        for environmental restoration, Matilija Dam, Ventura County, 
        California: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated December 20, 
        2004, at a total cost of $144,500,000, with an estimated Federal 
        cost of $89,700,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
        $54,800,000.
            (11) Middle creek, lake county, california.--The project for 
        flood damage reduction and environmental restoration, Middle 
        Creek, Lake County, California: Report of the Chief of Engineers 
        dated November 29, 2004, at a total cost of $45,200,000, with an 
        estimated Federal cost of $29,500,000 and an estimated non-
        Federal cost of $15,700,000.
            (12) Napa river salt marsh restoration, california.--
                    (A) In general.--The project for environmental 
                restoration, Napa River Salt Marsh Restoration, Napa, 
                California: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated 
                December 22, 2004, at a total cost of $134,500,000, with 
                an estimated Federal cost of $87,500,000 and an 
                estimated non-Federal cost of $47,000,000.
                    (B) Administration.--In carrying out the project 
                authorized by this paragraph, the Secretary shall--
                          (i) construct a recycled water pipeline 
                      extending from the Sonoma Valley County Sanitation 
                      District Waste Water Treatment Plant and the Napa 
                      Sanitation District Waste Water Treatment Plant to 
                      the project; and
                          (ii) restore or enhance Salt Ponds 1, 1A, 2, 
                      and 3.
            (13) Denver county reach, south platte river, denver, 
        colorado.--The project for environmental restoration, Denver 
        County Reach, South Platte River, Denver, Colorado: Report of 
        the Chief of Engineers dated May 16, 2003, at a total cost of 
        $20,100,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $13,065,000 and 
        an estimated non-Federal cost of $7,035,000.
            (14) Central and southern florida, indian river lagoon, 
        florida.--
                    (A) In general.--The Secretary may carry out the 
                project for ecosystem restoration, water supply, flood 
                control, and protection of water quality, Central and 
                Southern Florida, Indian River Lagoon, Florida, at a 
                total cost of $1,365,000,000, with an estimated Federal 
                cost of $682,500,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost 
                of $682,500,000, in accordance with section 601 of the 
                Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2680) 
                and the recommendations of the report of the Chief of 
                Engineers dated August 6, 2004.
                    (B) Deauthorizations.--The following projects are 
                not authorized after the date of enactment of this Act:
                          (i) The uncompleted portions of the project 
                      for the C-44 Basin Storage Reservoir of the 
                      Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan, 
                      authorized by section 601(b)(2)(C)(i) of the Water 
                      Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 
                      2682), at a total cost of $147,800,000, with an 
                      estimated Federal cost of $73,900,000 and an 
                      estimated non-Federal cost of $73,900,000.
                          (ii) The uncompleted portions of the Martin 
                      County, Florida, modifications to the project for 
                      Central

[[Page 121 STAT. 1052]]

                      and Southern Florida, authorized by section 203 of 
                      the Flood Control Act of 1968 (82 Stat. 740), at a 
                      total cost of $15,471,000, with an estimated 
                      Federal cost of $8,073,000 and an estimated non-
                      Federal cost of $7,398,000.
                          (iii) The uncompleted portions of the East 
                      Coast Backpumping, St. Lucie-Martin County, 
                      Spillway Structure S-311 modifications to the 
                      project for Central and Southern Florida, 
                      authorized by section 203 of the Flood Control Act 
                      of 1968 (82 Stat. 740), at a total cost of 
                      $77,118,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
                      $55,124,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
                      $21,994,000.
            (15) Comprehensive everglades restoration plan, central and 
        southern florida, picayune strand restoration project, collier 
        county, florida.--The project for ecosystem restoration, 
        Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan, Central and Southern 
        Florida, Picayune Strand Restoration Project, Collier County, 
        Florida: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated September 15, 
        2005, at a total cost of $375,330,000 with an estimated Federal 
        cost of $187,665,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
        $187,665,000.
            (16) Comprehensive everglades restoration plan, central and 
        southern florida, site 1 impoundment project, palm beach county, 
        florida.--The project for ecosystem restoration, Comprehensive 
        Everglades Restoration Plan, Central and Southern Florida, Site 
        1 Impoundment Project, Palm Beach County, Florida: Report of the 
        Chief of Engineers dated December 19, 2006, at a total cost of 
        $80,840,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $40,420,000 and 
        an estimated non-Federal cost of $40,420,000.
            (17) Miami harbor, miami-dade county, florida.--
                    (A) In general.--The project for navigation, Miami 
                Harbor, Miami-Dade County, Florida: Report of the Chief 
                of Engineers dated April 25, 2005, at a total cost of 
                $125,270,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
                $75,140,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
                $50,130,000.
                    (B) General reevaluation report.--The non-Federal 
                share of the cost of the general reevaluation report 
                that resulted in the report of the Chief of Engineers 
                referred to in subparagraph (A) shall be the same 
                percentage as the non-Federal share of cost of 
                construction of the project.
                    (C) Agreement.--The Secretary shall enter into a new 
                partnership with the non-Federal interest to reflect the 
                cost sharing required by subparagraph (B).
            (18) East st. louis and vicinity, illinois.--The project for 
        environmental restoration and recreation, East St. Louis and 
        Vicinity, Illinois: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated 
        December 22, 2004, at a total cost of $208,260,000, with an 
        estimated Federal cost of $134,910,000 and an estimated non-
        Federal cost of $73,350,000.
            (19) Peoria riverfront development, illinois.--The project 
        for environmental restoration, Peoria Riverfront Development, 
        Illinois: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated July 28, 2003, 
        at a total cost of $18,220,000, with an estimated

[[Page 121 STAT. 1053]]

        Federal cost of $11,840,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
        $6,380,000.
            (20) Wood river levee system reconstruction, madison county, 
        illinois.--The project for flood damage reduction, Wood River 
        Levee System Reconstruction, Madison County, Illinois: Report of 
        the Chief of Engineers dated July 18, 2006, at a total cost of 
        $17,220,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $11,193,000 and 
        an estimated non-Federal cost of $6,027,000.
            (21) Des moines and raccoon rivers, des moines, iowa.--The 
        project for flood damage reduction, Des Moines and Raccoon 
        Rivers, Des Moines, Iowa: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated 
        March 28, 2006, at a total cost of $10,780,000, with an 
        estimated Federal cost of $6,967,000 and an estimated non-
        Federal cost of $3,813,000.
            (22) Licking river basin, cynthiana, kentucky.--The project 
        for flood damage reduction, Licking River Basin, Cynthiana, 
        Kentucky: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated October 24, 
        2006, at a total cost of $18,200,000, with an estimated Federal 
        cost of $11,830,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
        $6,370,000.
            (23) Bayou sorrel lock, louisiana.--The project for 
        navigation, Bayou Sorrel Lock, Louisiana: Report of the Chief of 
        Engineers dated January 3, 2005, at a total cost of $9,600,000. 
        The costs of construction of the project are to be paid \1/2\ 
        from amounts appropriated from the general fund of the Treasury 
        and \1/2\ from amounts appropriated from the Inland Waterways 
        Trust Fund.
            (24) Morganza to the gulf of mexico, louisiana.--
                    (A) In general.--The project for hurricane and storm 
                damage reduction, Morganza to the Gulf of Mexico, 
                Louisiana: Reports of the Chief of Engineers dated 
                August 23, 2002, and July 22, 2003, at a total cost of 
                $886,700,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
                $576,355,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
                $310,345,000.
                    (B) Operation and maintenance.--The operation, 
                maintenance, repair, rehabilitation, and replacement of 
                the Houma Navigation Canal lock complex and the Gulf 
                Intracoastal Waterway floodgate features of the project 
                described in subparagraph (A) that provide for inland 
                waterway transportation shall be a Federal 
                responsibility in accordance with section 102 of the 
                Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 
                2212).
            (25) Port of iberia, louisiana.--The project for navigation, 
        Port of Iberia, Louisiana: Report of the Chief of Engineers 
        dated December 31, 2006, at a total cost of $131,250,000, with 
        an estimated Federal cost of $105,315,000 and an estimated non-
        Federal cost of $25,935,000; except that the Secretary, in 
        consultation with Vermillion and Iberia Parishes, Louisiana, and 
        consistent with the mitigation plan in the report, shall use 
        available dredged material and rock placement on the south bank 
        of the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway and the west bank of the 
        Freshwater Bayou Channel to provide incidental storm surge 
        protection that does not adversely affect the mitigation plan.
            (26) Smith island, somerset county, maryland.--The project 
        for environmental restoration, Smith Island, Somerset County, 
        Maryland: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated

[[Page 121 STAT. 1054]]

        October 29, 2001, at a total cost of $15,580,000, with an 
        estimated Federal cost of $10,127,000 and an estimated non-
        Federal cost of $5,453,000.
            (27) Roseau river, roseau, minnesota.--The project for flood 
        damage reduction, Roseau River, Roseau, Minnesota: Report of the 
        Chief of Engineers dated December 19, 2006, at a total cost of 
        $25,100,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $13,820,000 and 
        an estimated non-Federal cost of $11,280,000.
            (28) Argentine, east bottoms, fairfax-jersey creek, and 
        north kansas levees units, missouri river and tributaries at 
        kansas cities, missouri and kansas.--The project for flood 
        damage reduction, Argentine, East Bottoms, Fairfax-Jersey Creek, 
        and North Kansas Levees units, Missouri River and tributaries at 
        Kansas Cities, Missouri and Kansas: Report of the Chief of 
        Engineers dated December 19, 2006, at a total cost of 
        $65,430,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $42,530,000 and 
        an estimated non-Federal cost of $22,900,000.
            (29) Swope park industrial area, blue river, kansas city, 
        missouri.--The project for flood damage reduction, Swope Park 
        Industrial Area, Blue River, Kansas City, Missouri: Report of 
        the Chief of Engineers dated December 30, 2003, at a total cost 
        of $16,980,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $11,037,000 
        and an estimated non-Federal cost of $5,943,000.
            (30) Great egg harbor inlet to townsends inlet, new 
        jersey.--The project for hurricane and storm damage reduction, 
        Great Egg Harbor Inlet to Townsends Inlet, New Jersey: Report of 
        the Chief of Engineers dated October 24, 2006, at a total cost 
        of $54,360,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $35,069,000 
        and an estimated non-Federal cost of $19,291,000, and at an 
        estimated total cost of $202,500,000 for periodic nourishment 
        over the 50-year life of the project, with an estimated Federal 
        cost of $101,250,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
        $101,250,000.
            (31) Hudson raritan estuary, liberty state park, new 
        jersey.--
                    (A) In general.--The project for environmental 
                restoration, Hudson Raritan Estuary, Liberty State Park, 
                New Jersey: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated 
                August 25, 2006, at a total cost of $34,100,000, with an 
                estimated Federal cost of $22,200,000 and an estimated 
                non-Federal cost of $11,900,000.
                    (B) Restoration teams.--In carrying out the project, 
                the Secretary shall establish and utilize watershed 
                restoration teams composed of estuary restoration 
                experts from the Corps of Engineers, the New Jersey 
                department of environmental protection, and the Port 
                Authority of New York and New Jersey and other experts 
                designated by the Secretary for the purpose of 
                developing habitat restoration and water quality 
                enhancement.
            (32) New jersey shore protection study, manasquan inlet to 
        barnegat inlet, new jersey.--The project for hurricane and storm 
        damage reduction, New Jersey Shore Protection Study, Manasquan 
        Inlet to Barnegat Inlet, New Jersey: Report of the Chief of 
        Engineers dated December 30, 2003, at a total cost of 
        $71,900,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $46,735,000 and 
        an estimated non-Federal cost of $25,165,000,

[[Page 121 STAT. 1055]]

        and at an estimated total cost of $119,680,000 for periodic 
        beach nourishment over the 50-year life of the project, with an 
        estimated Federal cost of $59,840,000 and an estimated non-
        Federal cost of $59,840,000.
            (33) Raritan bay and sandy hook bay, union beach, new 
        jersey.--The project for hurricane and storm damage reduction, 
        Raritan Bay and Sandy Hook Bay, Union Beach, New Jersey: Report 
        of the Chief of Engineers dated January 4, 2006, at a total cost 
        of $115,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $74,800,000 
        and an estimated non-Federal cost of $40,200,000, and at an 
        estimated total cost of $6,500,000 for periodic nourishment over 
        the 50-year life of the project, with an estimated Federal cost 
        of $3,250,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $3,250,000.
            (34) South river, raritan river basin, new jersey.--The 
        project for hurricane and storm damage reduction and 
        environmental restoration, South River, Raritan River Basin, New 
        Jersey: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated July 22, 2003, at 
        a total cost of $122,300,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
        $79,500,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $42,800,000.
            (35) Southwest valley, bernalillo county, new mexico.--The 
        project for flood damage reduction, Southwest Valley, Bernalillo 
        County, New Mexico: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated 
        November 29, 2004, at a total cost of $24,840,000, with an 
        estimated Federal cost of $16,150,000 and an estimated non-
        Federal cost of $8,690,000.
            (36) Montauk point, new york.--The project for hurricane and 
        storm damage reduction, Montauk Point, New York: Report of the 
        Chief of Engineers dated March 31, 2006, at a total cost of 
        $14,600,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $7,300,000 and an 
        estimated non-Federal cost of $7,300,000.
            (37) Hocking river basin, monday creek, ohio.--
                    (A) In general.--The project for ecosystem 
                restoration, Hocking River Basin, Monday Creek, Ohio: 
                Report of the Chief of Engineers dated August 24, 2006, 
                at a total cost of $20,980,000, with an estimated 
                Federal cost of $13,440,000 and an estimated non-Federal 
                cost of $7,540,000.
                    (B) Wayne national forest.--
                          (i) In general.--The Secretary, in cooperation 
                      with the Secretary of Agriculture, may construct 
                      other project features on property that is located 
                      in the Wayne National Forest, Ohio, owned by the 
                      United States and managed by the Forest Service as 
                      described in the report of the Corps of Engineers 
                      entitled ``Hocking River Basin, Ohio, Monday Creek 
                      Sub-Basin Ecosystem Restoration Project 
                      Feasibility Report and Environmental Assessment''.
                          (ii) Cost.--Each project feature carried out 
                      on Federal land shall be designed, constructed, 
                      operated, and maintained at Federal expense.
                          (iii) Authorization of appropriations.--There 
                      is authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary 
                      of Agriculture to carry out this subparagraph 
                      $1,270,000.
            (38) Town of bloomsburg, columbia county, pennsylvania.--The 
        project for flood damage reduction, town of

[[Page 121 STAT. 1056]]

        Bloomsburg, Columbia County, Pennsylvania: Report of the Chief 
        of Engineers dated January 25, 2006, at a total cost of 
        $44,500,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $28,925,000 and 
        an estimated non-Federal cost of $15,575,000.
            (39) Pawleys island, south carolina.--The project for 
        hurricane and storm damage reduction, Pawleys Island, South 
        Carolina: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated December 19, 
        2006, at a total cost of $8,980,000, with an estimated Federal 
        cost of $5,840,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
        $3,140,000, and at an estimated total cost of $21,200,000 for 
        periodic nourishment over the 50-year life of the project, with 
        an estimated Federal cost of $10,600,000 and an estimated non-
        Federal cost of $10,600,000.
            (40) Corpus christi ship channel, corpus christi, texas.--
                    (A) In general.--The project for navigation and 
                ecosystem restoration, Corpus Christi Ship Channel, 
                Texas: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated June 2, 
                2003, at a total cost of $188,110,000, with an estimated 
                Federal cost of $87,810,000 and an estimated non-Federal 
                cost of $100,300,000.
                    (B) Navigational servitude.--In carrying out the 
                project under subparagraph (A), the Secretary shall 
                enforce the navigational servitude in the Corpus Christi 
                Ship Channel (including the removal or relocation of any 
                facility obstructing the project) consistent with the 
                cost sharing requirements of section 101 of the Water 
                Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2211).
            (41) Gulf intracoastal waterway, brazos river to port 
        o'connor, matagorda bay re-route, texas.--The project for 
        navigation, Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, Brazos River to Port 
        O'Connor, Matagorda Bay Re-Route, Texas: Report of the Chief of 
        Engineers dated December 24, 2002, at a total cost of 
        $17,280,000. The costs of construction of the project are to be 
        paid \1/2\ from amounts appropriated from the general fund of 
        the Treasury and \1/2\ from amounts appropriated from the Inland 
        Waterways Trust Fund.
            (42) Gulf intracoastal waterway, high island to brazos 
        river, texas.--The project for navigation, Gulf Intracoastal 
        Waterway, High Island to Brazos River, Texas: Report of the 
        Chief of Engineers dated April 16, 2004, at a total cost of 
        $14,450,000. The costs of construction of the project are to be 
        paid \1/2\ from amounts appropriated from the general fund of 
        the Treasury and \1/2\ from amounts appropriated from the Inland 
        Waterways Trust Fund.
            (43) Lower colorado river basin phase i, texas.--The project 
        for flood damage reduction and ecosystem restoration, Lower 
        Colorado River Basin Phase I, Texas: Report of the Chief of 
        Engineers dated December 31, 2006, at a total cost of 
        $110,730,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $69,640,000 and 
        an estimated non-Federal cost of $41,090,000.
            (44) Atlantic intracoastal waterway bridge replacement, deep 
        creek, chesapeake, virginia.--The project for Atlantic 
        Intracoastal Waterway Bridge Replacement, Deep Creek, 
        Chesapeake, Virginia: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated 
        March 3, 2003, at a total cost of $37,200,000.

[[Page 121 STAT. 1057]]

            (45) Craney island eastward expansion, norfolk harbor and 
        channels, hampton roads, virginia.--
                    (A) In general.--The project for navigation, Craney 
                Island Eastward Expansion, Norfolk Harbor and Channels, 
                Hampton Roads, Virginia: Report of Chief of Engineers 
                dated October 24, 2006, at a total cost of $712,103,000.
                    (B) Non-federal share.--Notwithstanding sections 101 
                and 103 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 
                (33 U.S.C. 2211 and 2213), the Federal share of the cost 
                of the project shall be 50 percent.
            (46) Centralia, chehalis river, lewis county, washington.--
                    (A) In general.--The project for flood damage 
                reduction, Centralia, Chehalis River, Lewis County, 
                Washington: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated 
                September 27, 2004, at a total cost of $123,770,000, 
                with an estimated Federal cost of $74,740,000 and an 
                estimated non-Federal cost of $49,030,000.
                    (B) Credit.--The Secretary shall--
                          (i) credit, in accordance with section 221 of 
                      the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-
                      5b), toward the non-Federal share of the cost of 
                      the project up to $6,500,000 for the cost of 
                      planning and design work carried out by the non-
                      Federal interest in accordance with the project 
                      study plan dated November 28, 1999; and
                          (ii) credit toward the non-Federal share of 
                      the cost of the project the cost of design and 
                      construction work carried out by the non-Federal 
                      interest before the date of the partnership 
                      agreement for the project if the Secretary 
                      determines that the work is integral to the 
                      project.
SEC. 1002. SMALL PROJECTS FOR FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study for each of the 
following projects and, if the Secretary determines that a project is 
feasible, may carry out the project under section 205 of the Flood 
Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s):
            (1) Haleyville, alabama.--Project for flood damage 
        reduction, Haleyville, Alabama.
            (2) Weiss lake, alabama.--Project for flood damage 
        reduction, Weiss Lake, Alabama.
            (3) Fort yukon, alaska.--Project for flood damage reduction, 
        Fort Yukon, Alaska.
            (4) Little colorado river levee, arizona.--Project for flood 
        damage reduction, Little Colorado River Levee, Arizona.
            (5) Cache river basin, grubbs, arkansas.--Project for flood 
        damage reduction, Cache River Basin, Grubbs, Arkansas.
            (6) Barrel springs wash, palmdale, california.--Project for 
        flood damage reduction, Barrel Springs Wash, Palmdale, 
        California.
            (7) Borrego springs, california.--Project for flood damage 
        reduction, Borrego Springs, California.
            (8) Colton, california.--Project for flood damage reduction, 
        Colton, California.
            (9) Dunlap stream, yucaipa, california.--Project for flood 
        damage reduction, Dunlap Stream, Yucaipa, California.

[[Page 121 STAT. 1058]]

            (10) Hunts canyon wash, palmdale, california.--Project for 
        flood damage reduction, Hunts Canyon Wash, Palmdale, California.
            (11) Ontario and chino, california.--Project for flood 
        damage reduction, Ontario and Chino, California.
            (12) Santa venetia, california.--Project for flood damage 
        reduction, Santa Venetia, California.
            (13) Whittier, california.--Project for flood damage 
        reduction, Whittier, California.
            (14) Wildwood creek, yucaipa, california.--Project for flood 
        damage reduction, Wildwood Creek, Yucaipa, California.
            (15) Bibb county and city of macon levee, georgia.--Project 
        for flood damage reduction, Bibb County and City of Macon Levee, 
        Georgia.
            (16) Fort wayne and vicinity, indiana.--Project for flood 
        damage reduction, St. Mary's and Maumee Rivers, Fort Wayne and 
        vicinity, Indiana.
            (17) St. francisville, lousiana.--Project for flood damage 
        reduction, St. Francisville, Louisiana.
            (18) Salem, massachusetts.--Project for flood damage 
        reduction, Salem, Massachusetts.
            (19) Cass river, michigan.--Project for flood damage 
        reduction, Cass River, Vassar and vicinity, Michigan.
            (20) Crow river, rockford, minnesota.--Project for flood 
        damage reduction, Crow River, Rockford, Minnesota.
            (21) Marsh creek, minnesota.--Project for flood damage 
        reduction, Marsh Creek, Minnesota.
            (22) South branch of the wild rice river, borup, 
        minnesota.--Project for flood damage reduction, South Branch of 
        the Wild Rice River, Borup, Minnesota.
            (23) Blacksnake creek, st. joseph, missouri.--Project for 
        flood damage reduction, Blacksnake Creek, St. Joseph, Missouri.
            (24) Acid brook, pompton lakes, new jersey.--Project for 
        flood damage reduction, Acid Brook, Pompton Lakes, New Jersey.
            (25) Canisteo river, addison, new york.--Project for flood 
        damage reduction, Canisteo River, Addison, New York.
            (26) Cohocton river, campbell, new york.--Project for flood 
        damage reduction, Cohocton River, Campbell, New York.
            (27) Dry and otter creeks, cortland, new york.--Project for 
        flood damage reduction, Dry and Otter Creeks, Cortland, New 
        York.
            (28) East river, silver beach, new york city, new york.--
        Project for flood damage reduction, East River, Silver Beach, 
        New York City, New York.
            (29) East valley creek, andover, new york.--Project for 
        flood damage reduction, East Valley Creek, Andover, New York.
            (30) Sunnyside brook, westchester county, new york.--Project 
        for flood damage reduction, Sunnyside Brook, Westchester County, 
        New York.
            (31) Little yankee and mud run, trumbull county, ohio.--
        Project for flood damage reduction, Little Yankee and Mud Run, 
        Trumbull County, Ohio.

[[Page 121 STAT. 1059]]

            (32) Little neshaminy creek, warrington, pennsylvania.--
        Project for flood damage reduction, Little Neshaminy Creek, 
        Warrington, Pennsylvania.
            (33) Southampton creek watershed, southampton, 
        pennsylvania.--Project for flood damage reduction, Southampton 
        Creek watershed, Southampton, Pennsylvania.
            (34) Spring creek, lower macungie township, pennsylvania.--
        Project for flood damage reduction, Spring Creek, Lower Macungie 
        Township, Pennsylvania.
            (35) Yardley aqueduct, silver and brock creeks, yardley, 
        pennsylvania.--Project for flood damage reduction, Yardley 
        Aqueduct, Silver and Brock Creeks, Yardley, Pennsylvania.
            (36) Surfside beach, south carolina.--Project for flood 
        damage reduction, Surfside Beach and vicinity, South Carolina.
            (37) Sandy creek, jackson county, tennessee.--A project for 
        flood damage reduction, Sandy Creek, Jackson County, Tennessee.
            (38) Congelosi ditch, missouri city, texas.--Project for 
        flood damage reduction, Congelosi Ditch, Missouri City, Texas.
            (39) Dilley, texas.--Project for flood damage reduction, 
        Dilley, Texas.
            (40) Cheyenne, wyoming.--Project for flood damage reduction, 
        Cheyenne, Wyoming.

    (b) Special Rules.--
            (1) Cache river basin, grubbs, arkansas.--The Secretary may 
        proceed with the project for the Cache River Basin, Grubbs, 
        Arkansas, referred to in subsection (a)(5), notwithstanding that 
        the project is located within the boundaries of the flood 
        control project, Cache River Basin, Arkansas and Missouri, 
        authorized by section 204 of the Flood Control Act of 1950, (64 
        Stat. 172) and modified by section 99 of the Water Resources 
        Development Act of 1974 (88 Stat. 41).
            (2) Ontario and chino, california.--The Secretary shall 
        carry out the project for flood damage reduction, Ontario and 
        Chino, California, referred to in subsection (a)(11) if the 
        Secretary determines that the project is feasible.
            (3) Santa venetia, california.--The Secretary shall carry 
        out the project for flood damage reduction, Santa Venetia, 
        California, referred to in subsection (a)(12) if the Secretary 
        determines that the project is feasible and shall allow the non-
        Federal interest to participate in the financing of the project 
        in accordance with section 903(c) of the Water Resources 
        Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4184) to the extent that the 
        Secretary's evaluation indicates that applying such section is 
        necessary to implement the project.
            (4) Whittier, california.--The Secretary shall carry out the 
        project for flood damage reduction, Whittier, California, 
        referred to in subsection (a)(13) if the Secretary determines 
        that the project is feasible.
            (5) <<NOTE: Review.>> Wildwood creek, yucaipa, california.--
        The Secretary shall review the locally prepared plan for the 
        project for flood damage, Wildwood Creek, California, referred 
        to in subsection (a)(14) and, if the Secretary determines that 
        the plan meets the evaluation and design standards of the Corps 
        of Engineers and that the plan is feasible, the Secretary may 
        use the plan to carry out the project and shall provide credit

[[Page 121 STAT. 1060]]

        toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the project for the 
        cost of work carried out by the non-Federal interest before the 
        date of the partnership agreement for the project if the 
        Secretary determines that the work is integral to the project.
            (6) Fort wayne and vicinity, indiana.--In carrying out the 
        project for flood damage reduction, St. Mary's and Maumee 
        Rivers, Fort Wayne and vicinity, Indiana, referred to in 
        subsection (a)(16) the Secretary shall--
                    (A) provide a 100-year level of flood protection at 
                the Berry Thieme, Park-Thompson, Woodhurst, and Tillman 
                sites along the St. Mary's River; and
                    (B) allow the non-Federal interest to participate in 
                the financing of the project in accordance with section 
                903(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 
                (100 Stat. 4184) to the extent that the Secretary's 
                evaluation indicates that applying such section is 
                necessary to implement the project.
            (7) South branch of the wild rice river, borup, minnesota.--
        In carrying out the project for flood damage reduction, South 
        Branch of the Wild Rice River, Borup, Minnesota, referred to in 
        subsection (a)(22) the Secretary may consider national ecosystem 
        restoration benefits in determining the Federal interest in the 
        project and shall allow the non-Federal interest to participate 
        in the financing of the project in accordance with section 
        903(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 
        4184) to the extent that the Secretary's evaluation indicates 
        that applying such section is necessary to implement the 
        project.
            (8) Acid brook, pompton lakes, new jersey.--The Secretary 
        shall carry out the project for flood damage reduction, Acid 
        Brook, Pompton Lakes, New Jersey, referred to in subsection 
        (a)(24) if the Secretary determines that the project is 
        feasible.
            (9) Sandy creek, tennessee.--Consistent with the report of 
        the Chief of Engineers dated March 24, 1948, on the West 
        Tennessee Tributaries project, in carrying out the project for 
        flood damage reduction, Sandy Creek, Tennessee, referred to in 
        section (a)(37)--
                    (A) Sandy Creek shall not be considered to be an 
                authorized channel of the West Tennessee Tributaries 
                project; and
                    (B) the project shall not be considered to be part 
                of the West Tennessee Tributaries project.
            (10) Dilley, texas.--The Secretary shall carry out the 
        project for flood damage reduction, Dilley, Texas, referred to 
        in subsection (a)(39) if the Secretary determines that the 
        project is feasible.
SEC. 1003. SMALL PROJECTS FOR EMERGENCY STREAMBANK PROTECTION.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study for each of the following 
projects and, if the Secretary determines that a project is feasible, 
may carry out the project under section 14 of the Flood Control Act of 
1946 (33 U.S.C. 701r):
            (1) Aliso creek, california.--Projects for emergency 
        streambank protection, Aliso Creek, California.

[[Page 121 STAT. 1061]]

            (2) St. johns bluff training wall, duval county, florida.--
        Project for emergency streambank protection, St. Johns Bluff 
        Training Wall, Duval County, Florida.
            (3) Gulf intracoastal waterway, iberville parish, 
        louisiana.--Projects for emergency streambank protection, Gulf 
        Intracoastal Waterway, Iberville Parish, Louisiana.
            (4) Ouachita and black rivers, arkansas and louisiana.--
        Projects for emergency streambank protection, Ouachita and Black 
        Rivers, Arkansas and Louisiana.
            (5) Piney point lighthouse, st. mary's county, maryland.--
        Project for emergency streambank protection, Piney Point 
        Lighthouse, St. Mary's County, Maryland.
            (6) Pug hole lake, minnesota.--Project for emergency 
        streambank protection, Pug Hole Lake, Minnesota.
            (7) Middle fork grand river, gentry county, missouri.--
        Project for emergency streambank protection, Middle Fork Grand 
        River, Gentry County, Missouri.
            (8) Platte river, platte city, missouri.--Project for 
        emergency streambank protection, Platte River, Platte City, 
        Missouri.
            (9) Rush creek, parkville, missouri.--Project for emergency 
        streambank protection, Rush Creek, Parkville, Missouri, 
        including measures to address degradation of the creek bed.
            (10) Dry and otter creeks, cortland county, new york.--
        Project for emergency streambank protection, Dry and Otter 
        Creeks, Cortland County, New York.
            (11) Keuka lake, hammondsport, new york.--Project for 
        emergency streambank protection, Keuka Lake, Hammondsport, New 
        York.
            (12) Kowawese unique area and hudson river, new windsor, new 
        york.--Project for emergency streambank protection, Kowawese 
        Unique Area and Hudson River, New Windsor, New York.
            (13) Owego creek, tioga county, new york.--Project for 
        emergency streambank protection, Owego Creek, Tioga County, New 
        York.
            (14) Howard road outfall, shelby county, tennessee.--Project 
        for emergency streambank protection, Howard Road outfall, Shelby 
        County, Tennessee.
            (15) Mitch farm ditch and lateral d, shelby county, 
        tennessee.--Project for emergency streambank protection, Mitch 
        Farm Ditch and Lateral D, Shelby County, Tennessee.
            (16) Wolf river tributaries, shelby county, tennessee.--
        Project for emergency streambank protection, Wolf River 
        tributaries, Shelby County, Tennessee.
            (17) Johnson creek, arlington, texas.--Project for emergency 
        streambank protection, Johnson Creek, Arlington, Texas.
            (18) Wells river, newbury, vermont.--Project for emergency 
        streambank protection, Wells River, Newbury, Vermont.
SEC. 1004. SMALL PROJECTS FOR NAVIGATION.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study for each of the 
following projects and, if the Secretary determines that a project is 
feasible, may carry out the project under section 107 of the River and 
Harbor Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 577):
            (1) Barrow harbor, alaska.--Project for navigation, Barrow 
        Harbor, Alaska.

[[Page 121 STAT. 1062]]

            (2) Coffman cove, alaska.--Project for navigation, Coffman 
        Cove, Alaska.
            (3) Kotzebue harbor, alaska.--Project for navigation, 
        Kotzebue Harbor, Alaska.
            (4) Nome harbor, alaska.--Project for navigation, Nome 
        Harbor, Alaska.
            (5) Old harbor, alaska.--Project for navigation, Old Harbor, 
        Alaska.
            (6) Little rock port, arkansas.--Project for navigation, 
        Little Rock Port, Arkansas River, Arkansas.
            (7) Mississippi river ship channel, louisiana.--Project for 
        navigation, Mississippi River Ship Channel, Louisiana.
            (8) East basin, cape cod canal, sandwich, massachusetts.--
        Project for navigation, East Basin, Cape Cod Canal, Sandwich, 
        Massachusetts.
            (9) Lynn harbor, lynn, massachusetts.--Project for 
        navigation, Lynn Harbor, Lynn, Massachusetts.
            (10) Merrimack river, haverhill, massachusetts.--Project for 
        navigation, Merrimack River, Haverhill, Massachusetts.
            (11) Oak bluffs harbor, oak bluffs, massachusetts.--Project 
        for navigation, Oak Bluffs Harbor, Oak Bluffs, Massachusetts.
            (12) Woods hole great harbor, falmouth, massachusetts.--
        Project for navigation, Woods Hole Great Harbor, Falmouth, 
        Massachusetts.
            (13) Au sable river, michigan.--Project for navigation, Au 
        Sable River in the vicinity of Oscoda, Michigan.
            (14) Clinton river, michigan.--Project for navigation, 
        Clinton River, Michigan.
            (15) Ontonagon river, michigan.--Project for navigation, 
        Ontonagon River, Ontonagon, Michigan.
            (16) Outer channel and inner harbor, menominee harbor, 
        michigan and wisconsin.--Project for navigation, Outer Channel 
        and Inner Harbor, Menominee Harbor, Michigan and Wisconsin.
            (17) Sebewaing river, michigan.--Project for navigation, 
        Sebewaing River, Michigan.
            (18) Traverse city harbor, traverse city, michigan.--Project 
        for navigation, Traverse City Harbor, Traverse City, Michigan.
            (19) Tower harbor, tower, minnesota.--Project for 
        navigation, Tower Harbor, Tower, Minnesota.
            (20) Olcott harbor, olcott, new york.--Project for 
        navigation, Olcott Harbor, Olcott, New York.
            (21) Milwaukee harbor, wisconsin.--Project for navigation, 
        Milwaukee Harbor, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.

    (b) Special Rules.--
            (1) <<NOTE: Review.>> Traverse city harbor, traverse city, 
        michigan.--The Secretary shall review the locally prepared plan 
        for the project for navigation, Traverse City Harbor, Michigan, 
        referred to in subsection (a)(18), and, if the Secretary 
        determines that the plan meets the evaluation and design 
        standards of the Corps of Engineers and that the plan is 
        feasible, the Secretary may use the plan to carry out the 
        project and shall provide credit toward the non-Federal share of 
        the cost of the project for the cost of work carried out by the 
        non-Federal interest

[[Page 121 STAT. 1063]]

        before the date of the partnership agreement for the project if 
        the Secretary determines that the work is integral to the 
        project.
            (2) Tower harbor, tower minnesota.--The Secretary shall 
        carry out the project for navigation, Tower Harbor, Tower, 
        Minnesota, referred to in subsection (a)(19) if the Secretary 
        determines that the project is feasible.
SEC. 1005. SMALL PROJECTS FOR IMPROVEMENT OF THE QUALITY OF THE 
                          ENVIRONMENT.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study for each of the following 
projects and, if the Secretary determines that a project is appropriate, 
may carry out the project under section 1135 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2309a):
            (1) Ballona creek, los angeles county, california.--Project 
        for improvement of the quality of the environment, Ballona 
        Creek, Los Angeles County, California.
            (2) Ballona lagoon tide gates, marina del rey, california.--
        Project for improvement of the quality of the environment, 
        Ballona Lagoon Tide Gates, Marina Del Rey, California.
            (3) Ft. george inlet, duval county, florida.--Project for 
        improvement of the quality of the environment, Ft. George Inlet, 
        Duval County, Florida.
            (4) Rathbun lake, iowa.--Project for improvement of the 
        quality of the environment, Rathbun Lake, Iowa.
            (5) Smithville lake, missouri.--Project for improvement of 
        the quality of the environment, Smithville Lake, Missouri.
            (6) Delaware bay, new jersey and delaware.--Project for 
        improvement of the quality of the environment, Delaware Bay, New 
        Jersey and Delaware, for the purpose of oyster restoration.
            (7) Tioga-hammond lakes, pennsylvania.--Project for 
        improvement of the quality of the environment, Tioga-Hammond 
        Lakes, Pennsylvania.
SEC. 1006. SMALL PROJECTS FOR AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study for each of the 
following projects and, if the Secretary determines that a project is 
appropriate, may carry out the project under section 206 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 2330):
            (1) Cypress creek, montgomery, alabama.--Project for aquatic 
        ecosystem restoration, Cypress Creek, Montgomery, Alabama.
            (2) Black lake, alaska.--Project for aquatic ecosystem 
        restoration, Black Lake, Alaska, at the head of the Chignik 
        watershed.
            (3) Ben lomond dam, santa cruz, california.--Project for 
        aquatic ecosystem restoration, Ben Lomond Dam, Santa Cruz, 
        California.
            (4) Dockweiler bluffs, los angeles county, california.--
        Project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Dockweiler Bluffs, 
        Los Angeles County, California.
            (5) Salt river, california.--Project for aquatic ecosystem 
        restoration, Salt River, California.
            (6) San diego river, california.--Project for aquatic 
        ecosystem restoration, San Diego River, California, including 
        efforts to address aquatic nuisance species.

[[Page 121 STAT. 1064]]

            (7) Santa rosa creek, santa rosa, california.--Project for 
        aquatic ecosystem restoration, Santa Rosa Creek in the vicinity 
        of the Prince Memorial Greenway, Santa Rosa, California.
            (8) Stockton deep water ship channel and lower san joaquin 
        river, california.--Project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, 
        Stockton Deep Water Ship Channel and lower San Joaquin River, 
        California.
            (9) Suisun marsh, san pablo bay, california.--Project for 
        aquatic ecosystem restoration, Suisun Marsh, San Pablo Bay, 
        California.
            (10) Sweetwater reservoir, san diego county, california.--
        Project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Sweetwater Reservoir, 
        San Diego County, California, including efforts to address 
        aquatic nuisance species.
            (11) Biscayne bay, florida.--Project for aquatic ecosystem 
        restoration, Biscayne Bay, Key Biscayne, Florida.
            (12) Clam bayou and dinkins bayou, sanibel island, 
        florida.--Project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Clam Bayou 
        and Dinkins Bayou, Sanibel Island, Florida.
            (13) Mountain park, georgia.--Project for aquatic ecosystem 
        restoration, Mountain Park, Georgia.
            (14) Chattahoochee fall line, georgia and alabama.--Project 
        for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Chattahoochee Fall Line, 
        Georgia and Alabama.
            (15) Longwood cove, gainesville, georgia.--Project for 
        aquatic ecosystem restoration, Longwood Cove, Gainesville, 
        Georgia.
            (16) City park, university lakes, louisiana.--Project for 
        aquatic ecosystem restoration, City Park, University Lakes, 
        Louisiana.
            (17) Lawrence gateway, massachusetts.--Project for aquatic 
        ecosystem restoration at the Lawrence Gateway quadrant project 
        along the Merrimack and Spicket Rivers in Lawrence, 
        Massachusetts, in accordance with the general conditions 
        established by the project approval of the Environmental 
        Protection Agency, Region I, including filling abandoned 
        drainage facilities and making improvements to the drainage 
        system on the Lawrence Gateway to prevent continued migration of 
        contaminated sediments into the river systems.
            (18) Milford pond, milford, massachusetts.--Project for 
        aquatic ecosystem restoration, Milford Pond, Milford, 
        Massachusetts.
            (19) Mill pond, littleton, massachusetts.--Project for 
        aquatic ecosystem restoration, Mill Pond, Littleton, 
        Massachusetts.
            (20) Pine tree brook, milton, massachusetts.--Project for 
        aquatic ecosystem restoration, Pine Tree Brook, Milton, 
        Massachusetts.
            (21) Clinton river, michigan.--Project for aquatic ecosystem 
        restoration, Clinton River, Michigan.
            (22) Kalamazoo river watershed, battle creek, michigan.--
        Project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Kalamazoo River 
        watershed, Battle Creek, Michigan.
            (23) Rush lake, minnesota.--Project for aquatic ecosystem 
        restoration, Rush Lake, Minnesota.

[[Page 121 STAT. 1065]]

            (24) South fork of the crow river, hutchinson, minnesota.--
        Project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, South Fork of the 
        Crow River, Hutchinson, Minnesota.
            (25) St. louis, missouri.--Project for aquatic ecosystem 
        restoration, St. Louis, Missouri.
            (26) Mobley dam, tongue river, montana.--Project for aquatic 
        ecosystem restoration, Mobley Dam, Tongue River, Montana.
            (27) S and h dam, tongue river, montana.--Project for 
        aquatic ecosystem restoration, S and H Dam, Tongue River, 
        Montana.
            (28) Vandalia dam, milk river, montana.--Project for aquatic 
        ecosystem restoration, Vandalia Dam, Milk River, Montana.
            (29) Truckee river, reno, nevada.--Project for aquatic 
        ecosystem restoration, Truckee River, Reno, Nevada, including 
        features for fish passage in Washoe County.
            (30) Grover's mill pond, new jersey.--Project for aquatic 
        ecosystem restoration, Grover's Mill Pond, New Jersey.
            (31) Caldwell county, north carolina.--Project for aquatic 
        ecosystem restoration, Caldwell County, North Carolina.
            (32) Mecklenburg county, north carolina.--Project for 
        aquatic ecosystem restoration, Mecklenburg County, North 
        Carolina.
            (33) Dugway creek, bratenahl, ohio.--Project for aquatic 
        ecosystem restoration, Dugway Creek, Bratenahl, Ohio.
            (34) Johnson creek, gresham, oregon.--Project for aquatic 
        ecosystem restoration, Johnson Creek, Gresham, Oregon.
            (35) Beaver creek, beaver and salem, pennsylvania.--Project 
        for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Beaver Creek, Beaver and 
        Salem, Pennsylvania.
            (36) Cementon dam, lehigh river, pennsylvania.--Project for 
        aquatic ecosystem restoration, Cementon Dam, Lehigh River, 
        Pennsylvania.
            (37) Ingham spring dam, solebury township, pennsylvania.--
        Project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Ingham Spring Dam, 
        Solebury Township, Pennsylvania.
            (38) Saucon creek, northampton county, pennsylvania.--
        Project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Saucon Creek, 
        Northampton County, Pennsylvania.
            (39) Stillwater lake dam, monroe county, pennsylvania.--
        Project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Stillwater Lake Dam, 
        Monroe County, Pennsylvania.
            (40) Blackstone river, rhode island.--Project for aquatic 
        ecosystem restoration, Blackstone River, Rhode Island.
            (41) Wilson branch, cheraw, south carolina.--Project for 
        aquatic ecosystem restoration, Wilson Branch, Cheraw, South 
        Carolina.
            (42) White river, bethel, vermont.--Project for aquatic 
        ecosystem restoration, White River, Bethel, Vermont.
            (43) College lake, lynchburg, virginia.--Project for aquatic 
        ecosystem restoration, College Lake, Lynchburg, Virginia.

    (b) Special Rules.--

[[Page 121 STAT. 1066]]

            (1) Black lake, alaska.--The Secretary shall carry out the 
        project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Black Lake, Alaska 
        referred to in subsection (a)(2) if the Secretary determines 
        that the project is appropriate.
            (2) Truckee river, reno, nevada.--The maximum amount of 
        Federal funds that may be expended for the project for aquatic 
        ecosystem restoration, Truckee River, Reno, Nevada, referred to 
        in subsection (a)(29) shall be $6,000,000 and the Secretary 
        shall carry out the project if the Secretary determines that the 
        project is appropriate.
            (3) Blackstone river, rhode island.--The Secretary shall 
        carry out the project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, 
        Blackstone River, Rhode Island, referred to in subsection 
        (a)(40) if the Secretary determines that the project is 
        appropriate.
            (4) College lake, lynchburg, virginia.--The Secretary shall 
        carry out the project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, College 
        Lake, Lynchburg, Virginia, referred to in subsection (a)(43) if 
        the Secretary determines that the project is appropriate.
SEC. 1007. SMALL PROJECTS FOR SHORELINE PROTECTION.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study for each of the following 
projects and, if the Secretary determines that a project is feasible, 
may carry out the project under section 3 of the Act entitled ``An Act 
authorizing Federal participation in the cost of protecting the shores 
of publicly owned property'', approved August 13, 1946 (33 U.S.C. 426g):
            (1) Nelson lagoon, alaska.--Project for shoreline 
        protection, Nelson Lagoon, Alaska.
            (2) Nicholas canyon, los angeles, california.--Project for 
        shoreline protection, Nicholas Canyon, Los Angeles, California.
            (3) Sanibel island, florida.--Project for shoreline 
        protection, Sanibel Island, Florida.
            (4) Apra harbor, guam.--Project for shoreline protection, 
        Apra Harbor, Guam.
            (5) Piti, cabras island, guam.--Project for shoreline 
        protection, Piti, Cabras Island, Guam.
            (6) Narrows and gravesend bay, upper new york bay, brooklyn, 
        new york.--Project for shoreline protection in the vicinity of 
        the confluence of the Narrows and Gravesend Bay, Upper New York 
        Bay, Shore Parkway Greenway, Brooklyn, New York.
            (7) Delaware river, philadelphia naval shipyard, 
        pennsylvania.--Project for shoreline protection, Delaware River 
        in the vicinity of the Philadelphia Naval Shipyard, 
        Pennsylvania.
            (8) Port aransas, texas.--Project for shoreline protection, 
        Port Aransas, Texas.
SEC. 1008. SMALL PROJECTS FOR SNAGGING AND SEDIMENT REMOVAL.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study for the following project and, 
if the Secretary determines that the project is feasible, the Secretary 
may carry out the project under section 2 of the Flood Control Act of 
August 28, 1937 (33 U.S.C. 701g): Project for removal of snags and 
clearing and straightening of channels for flood control,

[[Page 121 STAT. 1067]]

Kowawese Unique Area and Hudson River, New Windsor, New York.
SEC. 1009. <<NOTE: Georgia. Indiana.>> SMALL PROJECTS TO PREVENT 
                          OR MITIGATE DAMAGE CAUSED BY NAVIGATION 
                          PROJECTS.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study for each of the following 
projects and, if the Secretary determines that a project is feasible, 
may carry out the project under section 111 of the River and Harbor Act 
of 1968 (33 U.S.C. 426i):
            (1) Tybee Island, Georgia.
            (2) Burns Waterway Harbor, Indiana.
SEC. 1010. <<NOTE: Nebraska.>> SMALL PROJECTS FOR AQUATIC PLANT 
                          CONTROL.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary is authorized to carry out a project 
for aquatic nuisance plant control in the Republican River Basin, 
Nebraska, under section 104 of the River and Harbor Act of 1958 (33 
U.S.C. 610).
    (b) Special Rule.--In carrying out the project under subsection (a), 
the Secretary may control and eradicate riverine nuisance plants.

                      TITLE II--GENERAL PROVISIONS

SEC. 2001. NON-FEDERAL CONTRIBUTIONS.

    Section 103 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 
U.S.C. 2213) is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(n) Non-Federal Contributions.--
            ``(1) Prohibition on solicitation of excess contributions.--
        The Secretary may not--
                    ``(A) solicit contributions from non-Federal 
                interests for costs of constructing authorized water 
                resources projects or measures in excess of the non-
                Federal share assigned to the appropriate project 
                purposes listed in subsections (a), (b), and (c); or
                    ``(B) condition Federal participation in such 
                projects or measures on the receipt of such 
                contributions.
            ``(2) Limitation on statutory construction.--Nothing in this 
        subsection shall be construed to affect the Secretary's 
        authority under section 903(c).''.
SEC. 2002. FUNDING TO PROCESS PERMITS.

    Section 214(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (33 
U.S.C. 2201 note; 114 Stat. 2594; 119 Stat. 2169; 120 Stat. 318; 120 
Stat. 3197) is amended by striking ``2008'' and inserting ``2009''.
SEC. 2003. WRITTEN AGREEMENT FOR WATER RESOURCES PROJECTS.

    (a) In General.--Section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 
U.S.C. 1962d-5b) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``sec. 221.'' and inserting the following:
``SEC. 221. WRITTEN AGREEMENT REQUIREMENT FOR WATER RESOURCES 
                        PROJECTS.'';
            (2) by striking subsection (a) and inserting the following:

    ``(a) Cooperation of Non-Federal Interest.--
            ``(1) In general.--After <<NOTE: Effective date.>> December 
        31, 1970, the construction of any water resources project, or an 
        acceptable separable

[[Page 121 STAT. 1068]]

        element thereof, by the Secretary of the Army, acting through 
        the Chief of Engineers, or by a non-Federal interest where such 
        interest will be reimbursed for such construction under any 
        provision of law, shall not be commenced until each non-Federal 
        interest has entered into a written partnership agreement with 
        the Secretary (or, where appropriate, the district engineer for 
        the district in which the project will be carried out) under 
        which each party agrees to carry out its responsibilities and 
        requirements for implementation or construction of the project 
        or the appropriate element of the project, as the case may be; 
        except that no such agreement shall be required if the Secretary 
        determines that the administrative costs associated with 
        negotiating, executing, or administering the agreement would 
        exceed the amount of the contribution required from the non-
        Federal interest and are less than $25,000.
            ``(2) Liquidated damages.--A partnership agreement described 
        in paragraph (1) may include a provision for liquidated damages 
        in the event of a failure of one or more parties to perform.
            ``(3) Obligation of future appropriations.--In any 
        partnership agreement described in paragraph (1) and entered 
        into by a State, or a body politic of the State which derives 
        its powers from the State constitution, or a governmental entity 
        created by the State legislature, the agreement may reflect that 
        it does not obligate future appropriations for such performance 
        and payment when obligating future appropriations would be 
        inconsistent with constitutional or statutory limitations of the 
        State or a political subdivision of the State.
            ``(4) Credit for in-kind contributions.--
                    ``(A) In general.--A partnership agreement described 
                in paragraph (1) may provide with respect to a project 
                that the Secretary shall credit toward the non-Federal 
                share of the cost of the project, including a project 
                implemented without specific authorization in law, the 
                value of in-kind contributions made by the non-Federal 
                interest, including--
                          ``(i) the costs of planning (including data 
                      collection), design, management, mitigation, 
                      construction, and construction services that are 
                      provided by the non-Federal interest for 
                      implementation of the project;
                          ``(ii) the value of materials or services 
                      provided before execution of the partnership 
                      agreement, including efforts on constructed 
                      elements incorporated into the project; and
                          ``(iii) the value of materials and services 
                      provided after execution of the partnership 
                      agreement.
                    ``(B) Condition.--The Secretary may credit an in-
                kind contribution under subparagraph (A) only if the 
                Secretary determines that the material or service 
                provided as an in-kind contribution is integral to the 
                project.
                    ``(C) Work performed before partnership agreement.--
                In any case in which the non-Federal interest is to 
                receive credit under subparagraph (A)(ii) for the cost 
                of work carried out by the non-Federal interest and such 
                work has not been carried out as of the date of 
                enactment of this subparagraph, the Secretary and the 
                non-Federal interest shall enter into an agreement under 
                which the

[[Page 121 STAT. 1069]]

                non-Federal interest shall carry out such work, and only 
                work carried out following the execution of the 
                agreement shall be eligible for credit.
                    ``(D) Limitations.--Credit authorized under this 
                paragraph for a project--
                          ``(i) shall not exceed the non-Federal share 
                      of the cost of the project;
                          ``(ii) shall not alter any other requirement 
                      that a non-Federal interest provide lands, 
                      easements, relocations, rights-of-way, or areas 
                      for disposal of dredged material for the project;
                          ``(iii) shall not alter any requirement that a 
                      non-Federal interest pay a portion of the costs of 
                      construction of the project under sections 101 and 
                      103 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 
                      (33 U.S.C. 2211; 33 U.S.C. 2213); and
                          ``(iv) shall not exceed the actual and 
                      reasonable costs of the materials, services, or 
                      other things provided by the non-Federal interest, 
                      as determined by the Secretary.
                    ``(E) Applicability.--
                          ``(i) In general.--This <<NOTE: Effective 
                      date.>> paragraph shall apply to water resources 
                      projects authorized after November 16, 1986, 
                      including projects initiated after November 16, 
                      1986, without specific authorization in law.
                          ``(ii) Limitation.--In any case in which a 
                      specific provision of law provides for a non-
                      Federal interest to receive credit toward the non-
                      Federal share of the cost of a study for, or 
                      construction or operation and maintenance of, a 
                      water resources project, the specific provision of 
                      law shall apply instead of this paragraph.''.

    (b) Non-Federal Interest.--Section 221(b) of such Act is amended to 
read as follows:
    ``(b) Definition of Non-Federal Interest.--The term `non-Federal 
interest' means--
            ``(1) a legally constituted public body (including a 
        federally recognized Indian tribe); or
            ``(2) a nonprofit entity with the consent of the affected 
        local government,

that has full authority and capability to perform the terms of its 
agreement and to pay damages, if necessary, in the event of failure to 
perform.''.
    (c) Program Administration.--Section 221 of such Act is further 
amended--
            (1) by redesignating subsection (e) as subsection (h); and
            (2) by inserting after subsection (d) the following:

    ``(e) Delegation of Authority.--
Not <<NOTE: Deadlines. Guidelines.>> later than June 30, 2008, the 
Secretary shall issue policies and guidelines for partnership agreements 
that delegate to the district engineers, at a minimum--
            ``(1) the authority to approve any policy in a partnership 
        agreement that has appeared in an agreement previously approved 
        by the Secretary;
            ``(2) the authority to approve any policy in a partnership 
        agreement the specific terms of which are dictated by law or by 
        a final feasibility study, final environmental impact statement, 
        or other final decision document for a water resources project;

[[Page 121 STAT. 1070]]

            ``(3) the authority to approve any partnership agreement 
        that complies with the policies and guidelines issued by the 
        Secretary; and
            ``(4) <<NOTE: Notification.>> the authority to sign any 
        partnership agreement for any water resources project unless, 
        within 30 days of the date of authorization of the project, the 
        Secretary notifies the district engineer in which the project 
        will be carried out that the Secretary wishes to retain the 
        prerogative to sign the partnership agreement for that project.

    ``(f) Report to Congress.--Not later than 2 years after the date of 
enactment of this subsection, and every year thereafter, the Secretary 
shall submit to Congress a report detailing the following:
            ``(1) The number of partnership agreements signed by 
        district engineers and the number of partnership agreements 
        signed by the Secretary.
            ``(2) For any partnership agreement signed by the Secretary, 
        an explanation of why delegation to the district engineer was 
        not appropriate.

    ``(g) Public Availability.--Not <<NOTE: Deadlines. Internet.>> later 
than 120 days after the date of enactment of this subsection, the Chief 
of Engineers shall--
            ``(1) ensure that each district engineer has made available 
        to the public, including on the Internet, all partnership 
        agreements entered into under this section within the preceding 
        10 years and all partnership agreements for water resources 
        projects currently being carried out in that district; and
            ``(2) make each partnership agreement entered into after 
        such date of enactment available to the public, including on the 
        Internet, not later than 7 days after the date on which such 
        agreement is entered into.''.

    (d) Local Cooperation.--Section <<NOTE: 42 USC 1962d-5b 
note.>> 912(b) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (101 Stat. 
4190) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (2)--
                    (A) by striking ``shall'' the first place it appears 
                and inserting ``may''; and
                    (B) by striking the last sentence; and
            (2) in paragraph (4)--
                    (A) by inserting after ``injunction, for'' the 
                following: ``payment of damages or, for'';
                    (B) by striking ``to collect a civil penalty imposed 
                under this section,''; and
                    (C) by striking ``any civil penalty imposed under 
                this section,'' and inserting ``any damages,''.

    (e) Applicability.--The <<NOTE: 42 USC 1962d-5b note.>> amendments 
made by subsections (a), (b), and (d) only apply to partnership 
agreements entered into after the date of enactment of this Act; except 
that, at the request of a non-Federal interest for a project, the 
district engineer for the district in which the project is located may 
amend a project partnership agreement entered into on or before such 
date and under which construction on the project has not been initiated 
as of such date of enactment for the purpose of incorporating such 
amendments.

    (f) <<NOTE: 42 USC 1962d-5b note.>> Agreements and References.--
            (1) In general.--A goal of agreements entered into under 
        section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-
        5b) shall be to further partnership and cooperation, and the 
        agreements shall be referred to as ``partnership agreements''.

[[Page 121 STAT. 1071]]

            (2) References to cooperation agreements.--Any reference in 
        a law, regulation, document, or other paper of the United States 
        to a ``cooperation agreement'' or ``project cooperation 
        agreement'' shall be deemed to be a reference to a ``partnership 
        agreement'' or a ``project partnership agreement'', 
        respectively.
            (3) References to partnership agreements.--Any reference to 
        a ``partnership agreement'' or ``project partnership agreement'' 
        in this Act (other than this section) shall be deemed to be a 
        reference to a ``cooperation agreement'' or a ``project 
        cooperation agreement'', respectively.
SEC. 2004. <<NOTE: Publication. 33 USC 2295 note.>> COMPILATION OF 
                          LAWS.

    (a) Compilation of Laws Enacted After November 8, 1966.--The 
Secretary and the Chief of Engineers shall prepare a compilation of the 
laws of the United States relating to the improvement of rivers and 
harbors, flood damage reduction, beach and shoreline erosion, hurricane 
and storm damage reduction, ecosystem and environmental restoration, and 
other water resources development enacted after November 8, 1966, and 
before January 1, 2008, and have such compilation printed for the use of 
the Department of the Army, Congress, and the general public.
    (b) Reprint of Laws Enacted Before November 8, 1966.--The Secretary 
shall have the volumes containing the laws referred to in subsection (a) 
enacted before November 8, 1966, reprinted.
    (c) Index.--The Secretary shall include an index in each volume 
compiled, and each volume reprinted, pursuant to this section.
    (d) Congressional Copies.--Not <<NOTE: Deadline.>> later than April 
1, 2008, the Secretary shall transmit at least 25 copies of each volume 
compiled, and of each volume reprinted, pursuant to this section to each 
of the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of 
Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the 
Senate.

    (e) Availability.--The <<NOTE: Internet.>> Secretary shall ensure 
that each volume compiled, and each volume reprinted, pursuant to this 
section are available through electronic means, including on the 
Internet.
SEC. 2005. DREDGED MATERIAL DISPOSAL.

    Section 217 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (33 
U.S.C. 2326a) is amended--
            (1) by redesignating subsection (c) as subsection (d);
            (2) by inserting after subsection (b) the following:

    ``(c) Dredged Material Facility.--
            ``(1) In general.--The Secretary may enter into a 
        partnership agreement under section 221 of the Flood Control Act 
        of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b) with one or more non-Federal 
        interests with respect to a water resources project, or group of 
        water resources projects within a geographic region, if 
        appropriate, for the acquisition, design, construction, 
        management, or operation of a dredged material processing, 
        treatment, contaminant reduction, or disposal facility 
        (including any facility used to demonstrate potential beneficial 
        uses of dredged material, which may include effective sediment 
        contaminant reduction technologies) using funds provided in 
        whole or in part by the Federal Government.
            ``(2) Performance.--One or more of the parties to a 
        partnership agreement under this subsection may perform the 
        acquisition, design, construction, management, or operation of

[[Page 121 STAT. 1072]]

        a dredged material processing, treatment, contaminant reduction, 
        or disposal facility.
            ``(3) Multiple projects.--If appropriate, the Secretary may 
        combine portions of separate water resources projects with 
        appropriate combined cost-sharing among the various water 
        resources projects in a partnership agreement for a facility 
        under this subsection if the facility serves to manage dredged 
        material from multiple water resources projects located in the 
        geographic region of the facility.
            ``(4) Specified federal funding sources and cost sharing.--
                    ``(A) Specified federal funding.--A partnership 
                agreement with respect to a facility under this 
                subsection shall specify--
                          ``(i) the Federal funding sources and combined 
                      cost-sharing when applicable to multiple water 
                      resources projects; and
                          ``(ii) the responsibilities and risks of each 
                      of the parties relating to present and future 
                      dredged material managed by the facility.
                    ``(B) Management of sediments.--
                          ``(i) In general.--A partnership agreement 
                      under this subsection may include the management 
                      of sediments from the maintenance dredging of 
                      Federal water resources projects that do not have 
                      partnership agreements.
                          ``(ii) Payments.--A partnership agreement 
                      under this subsection may allow the non-Federal 
                      interest to receive reimbursable payments from the 
                      Federal Government for commitments made by the 
                      non-Federal interest for disposal or placement 
                      capacity at dredged material processing, 
                      treatment, contaminant reduction, or disposal 
                      facilities.
                    ``(C) Credit.--A partnership agreement under this 
                subsection may allow costs incurred by the non-Federal 
                interest before execution of the partnership agreement 
                to be credited in accordance with section 221 of the 
                Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b).
            ``(5) Credit.--
                    ``(A) Effect on existing agreements.--Nothing in 
                this subsection supersedes or modifies an agreement in 
                effect on the date of enactment of this paragraph 
                between the Federal Government and any non-Federal 
                interest for the cost-sharing, construction, and 
                operation and maintenance of a water resources project.
                    ``(B) Credit for funds.--Subject to the approval of 
                the Secretary and in accordance with law (including 
                regulations and policies) in effect on the date of 
                enactment of this paragraph, a non-Federal interest for 
                a water resources project may receive credit for funds 
                provided for the acquisition, design, construction, 
                management, or operation of a dredged material 
                processing, treatment, contaminant reduction, or 
                disposal facility to the extent the facility is used to 
                manage dredged material from the project.
                    ``(C) Non-federal interest responsibilities.--A non-
                Federal interest entering into a partnership agreement 
                under this subsection for a facility shall--

[[Page 121 STAT. 1073]]

                          ``(i) be responsible for providing all 
                      necessary lands, easements, relocations, and 
                      rights-of-way associated with the facility; and
                          ``(ii) receive credit toward the non-Federal 
                      share of the cost of the project with respect to 
                      which the agreement is being entered into for 
                      those items.''; and
            (3) in paragraphs (1) and (2)(A) of subsection (d) (as 
        redesignated by paragraph (1))--
                    (A) by inserting ``and maintenance'' after 
                ``operation'' each place it appears; and
                    (B) by inserting ``processing, treatment, 
                contaminant reduction, or'' after ``dredged material'' 
                the first place it appears in each of those paragraphs.
SEC. 2006. <<NOTE: 33 USC 2242.>> REMOTE AND SUBSISTENCE HARBORS.

    (a) In General.--In conducting a study of harbor and navigation 
improvements, the Secretary may recommend a project without the need to 
demonstrate that the project is justified solely by national economic 
development benefits if the Secretary determines that--
            (1)(A) the community to be served by the project is at least 
        70 miles from the nearest surface accessible commercial port and 
        has no direct rail or highway link to another community served 
        by a surface accessible port or harbor; or
            (B) the project would be located in the State of Hawaii, the 
        Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Guam, the Commonwealth of the 
        Northern Mariana Islands, the United States Virgin Islands, or 
        American Samoa;
            (2) the harbor is economically critical such that over 80 
        percent of the goods transported through the harbor would be 
        consumed within the community served by the harbor and 
        navigation improvement; and
            (3) the long-term viability of the community would be 
        threatened without the harbor and navigation improvement.

    (b) Justification.--In considering whether to recommend a project 
under subsection (a), the Secretary shall consider the benefits of the 
project to--
            (1) public health and safety of the local community, 
        including access to facilities designed to protect public health 
        and safety;
            (2) access to natural resources for subsistence purposes;
            (3) local and regional economic opportunities;
            (4) welfare of the local population; and
            (5) social and cultural value to the community.
SEC. 2007. <<NOTE: 33 USC 2222.>> USE OF OTHER FEDERAL FUNDS.

    The non-Federal interest for a water resources study or project may 
use, and the Secretary shall accept, funds provided by a Federal agency 
under any other Federal program, to satisfy, in whole or in part, the 
non-Federal share of the cost of the study or project if the Federal 
agency that provides the funds determines that the funds are authorized 
to be used to carry out the study or project.
SEC. 2008. <<NOTE: 33 USC 2340.>> REVISION OF PROJECT PARTNERSHIP 
                          AGREEMENT; COST SHARING.

    (a) Federal Allocation.--Upon authorization by law of an increase in 
the maximum amount of Federal funds that may be

[[Page 121 STAT. 1074]]

allocated for a water resources project or an increase in the total cost 
of a water resources project authorized to be carried out by the 
Secretary, the Secretary shall enter into a revised partnership 
agreement for the project to take into account the change in Federal 
participation in the project.
    (b)  Cost Sharing.--An increase in the maximum amount of Federal 
funds that may be allocated for a water resources project, or an 
increase in the total cost of a water resources project, authorized to 
be carried out by the Secretary shall not affect any cost-sharing 
requirement applicable to the project.
    (c) Cost Estimates.--The estimated Federal and non-Federal costs of 
water resources projects authorized to be carried out by the Secretary 
before, on, or after the date of enactment of this Act are for 
informational purposes only and shall not be interpreted as affecting 
the cost-sharing responsibilities established by law.
SEC. 2009. <<NOTE: 33 USC 2341.>> EXPEDITED ACTIONS FOR EMERGENCY 
                          FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION.

    The Secretary shall expedite any authorized planning, design, and 
construction of any project for flood damage reduction for an area that, 
within the preceding 5 years, has been subject to flooding that resulted 
in the loss of life and caused damage of sufficient severity and 
magnitude to warrant a declaration of a major disaster by the President 
under the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance 
Act (42 U.S.C. 5121 et seq.).
SEC. 2010. WATERSHED AND RIVER BASIN ASSESSMENTS.

    Section 729 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 
U.S.C. 2267a; 114 Stat. 2587-2588; 100 Stat. 4164) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (d)--
                    (A) by striking ``and'' at the end of paragraph (4);
                    (B) by striking the period at the end of paragraph 
                (5) and inserting a semicolon; and
                    (C) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(6) Tuscarawas River Basin, Ohio;
            ``(7) Sauk River Basin, Snohomish and Skagit Counties, 
        Washington;
            ``(8) Niagara River Basin, New York;
            ``(9) Genesee River Basin, New York; and
            ``(10) White River Basin, Arkansas and Missouri.'';
            (2) by striking paragraph (1) of subsection (f) and 
        inserting the following:
            ``(1) Non-federal share.--The <<NOTE: Effective date.>> non-
        Federal share of the costs of an assessment carried out under 
        this section on or after December 11, 2000, shall be 25 
        percent.''; and
            (3) by striking subsection (g).
SEC. 2011. TRIBAL PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM.

    (a) Program.--Section 203(b) of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 2000 (33 U.S.C. 2269(b); 114 Stat. 2589) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1) by inserting ``carry out water-related 
        planning activities and'' after ``the Secretary may'';
            (2) in paragraph (1)(B) by inserting after ``Code'' the 
        following: ``, and including lands that are within the 
        jurisdictional area of an Oklahoma Indian tribe, as determined 
        by the Secretary of the Interior, and are recognized by the 
        Secretary

[[Page 121 STAT. 1075]]

        of the Interior as eligible for trust land status under part 151 
        of title 25, Code of Federal Regulations''; and
            (3) in paragraph (2)--
                    (A) by striking ``and'' at the end of subparagraph 
                (A);
                    (B) by redesignating subparagraph (B) as 
                subparagraph (C); and
                    (C) by inserting after subparagraph (A) the 
                following:
                    ``(B) watershed assessments and planning activities; 
                and''.

    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--Section 203(e) of such Act is 
amended by striking ``2006'' and inserting ``2012''.
SEC. 2012. WILDFIRE FIREFIGHTING.

    Section 309 of Public Law 102-154 (42 U.S.C. 1856a-1; 105 Stat. 
1034) is amended by inserting ``the Secretary of the Army,'' after ``the 
Secretary of Energy,''.
SEC. 2013. TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE.

    Section 22 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 
1962d-16) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a) by striking ``The Secretary'' and 
        inserting the following:

    ``(a) Federal State Cooperation.--
            ``(1) Comprehensive plans.--The Secretary'';
            (2) by inserting after the last sentence in subsection (a) 
        the following:
            ``(2) Technical assistance.--
                    ``(A) In general.--At the request of a governmental 
                agency or non-Federal interest, the Secretary may 
                provide, at Federal expense, technical assistance to 
                such agency or non-Federal interest in managing water 
                resources.
                    ``(B) Types of assistance.--Technical assistance 
                under this paragraph may include provision and 
                integration of hydrologic, economic, and environmental 
                data and analyses.'';
            (3) in subsection (b)(1) by striking ``this section'' each 
        place it appears and inserting ``subsection (a)(1)'';
            (4) in subsection (b)(2) by striking ``Up to \1/2\ of the'' 
        and inserting ``The'';
            (5) in subsection (c) by striking ``(c) There is'' and 
        inserting the following:

    ``(c) Authorization of Appropriations.--
            ``(1) Federal and state cooperation.--There is'';
            (6) in subsection (c)(1) (as designated by paragraph (5))--
                    (A) by striking ``the provisions of this section'' 
                and inserting ``subsection (a)(1),''; and
                    (B) by striking ``$500,000'' and inserting 
                ``$2,000,000'';
            (7) by inserting at the end of subsection (c) the following:
            ``(2) Technical assistance.--There is authorized to be 
        appropriated $5,000,000 annually to carry out subsection (a)(2), 
        of which not more than $2,000,000 annually may be used by the 
        Secretary to enter into cooperative agreements with nonprofit 
        organizations to provide assistance to rural and small 
        communities.'';
            (8) by redesignating subsection (d) as subsection (e); and
            (9) by inserting after subsection (c) the following:

    ``(d) <<NOTE: Reports.>> Annual Submission of Proposed Activities.--
Concurrent with the President's submission to Congress of the 
President's

[[Page 121 STAT. 1076]]

request for appropriations for the Civil Works Program for a fiscal 
year, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Transportation and 
Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on 
Environment and Public Works of the Senate a report describing the 
individual activities proposed for funding under subsection (a)(1) for 
that fiscal year.''.
SEC. 2014. LAKES PROGRAM.

    Section 602(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 
Stat. 4148; 110 Stat. 3758; 113 Stat. 295) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``and'' at end of paragraph (18);
            (2) by striking the period at the end of paragraph (19) and 
        inserting a semicolon; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(20) Kinkaid Lake, Jackson County, Illinois, removal of 
        silt and aquatic growth and measures to address excessive 
        sedimentation;
            ``(21) McCarter Pond, Borough of Fairhaven, New Jersey, 
        removal of silt and measures to address water quality;
            ``(22) Rogers Pond, Franklin Township, New Jersey, removal 
        of silt and restoration of structural integrity;
            ``(23) Greenwood Lake, New York and New Jersey, removal of 
        silt and aquatic growth;
            ``(24) Lake Rodgers, Creedmoor, North Carolina, removal of 
        silt and excessive nutrients and restoration of structural 
        integrity;
            ``(25) Lake Sakakawea, North Dakota, removal of silt and 
        aquatic growth and measures to address excessive sedimentation;
            ``(26) Lake Luxembourg, Pennsylvania;
            ``(27) Lake Fairlee, Vermont, removal of silt and aquatic 
        growth and measures to address excessive sedimentation; and
            ``(28) Lake Morley, Vermont, removal of silt and aquatic 
        growth and measures to address excessive sedimentation.''.
SEC. 2015. <<NOTE: 33 USC 2317a.>> COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS.

    (a) In General.--For the purpose of expediting the cost-effective 
design and construction of wetlands restoration that is part of an 
authorized water resources project, the Secretary may enter into 
cooperative agreements under section 6305 of title 31, United States 
Code, with nonprofit organizations with expertise in wetlands 
restoration to carry out such design and construction on behalf of the 
Secretary.
    (b) Limitations.--
            (1) Per project limit.--A cooperative agreement under this 
        section may not obligate the Secretary to pay the nonprofit 
        organization more than $1,000,000 for any single wetlands 
        restoration project.
            (2) Annual limit.--The total value of work carried out under 
        cooperative agreements under this section may not exceed 
        $5,000,000 in any fiscal year.
SEC. 2016. <<NOTE: 33 USC 574a.>> TRAINING FUNDS.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary may include individuals not employed 
by the Department of the Army in training classes and courses offered by 
the Corps of Engineers in any case in which the Secretary determines 
that it is in the best interest of the Federal Government to include 
those individuals as participants.

[[Page 121 STAT. 1077]]

    (b) Expenses.--
            (1) In general.--An individual not employed by the 
        Department of the Army attending a training class or course 
        described in subsection (a) shall pay the full cost of the 
        training provided to the individual.
            (2) Payments.--Payments made by an individual for training 
        received under paragraph (1), up to the actual cost of the 
        training--
                    (A) may be retained by the Secretary;
                    (B) shall be credited to an appropriations account 
                used for paying training costs; and
                    (C) shall be available for use by the Secretary, 
                without further appropriation, for training purposes.
            (3) Excess amounts.--Any payments received under paragraph 
        (2) that are in excess of the actual cost of training provided 
        shall be credited as miscellaneous receipts to the Treasury of 
        the United States.
SEC. 2017. <<NOTE: 33 USC 2342.>> ACCESS TO WATER RESOURCE DATA.

    (a) In General.--The <<NOTE: Public information.>> Secretary shall 
carry out a program to provide public access to water resources and 
related water quality data in the custody of the Corps of Engineers.

    (b) Data.--Public access under subsection (a) shall--
            (1) include, at a minimum, access to data generated in water 
        resources project development and regulation under section 404 
        of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1344); and
            (2) appropriately employ geographic information system 
        technology and linkages to water resource models and analytical 
        techniques.

    (c) Partnerships.--To the maximum extent practicable, in carrying 
out activities under this section, the Secretary shall develop 
partnerships, including cooperative agreements, with State, tribal, and 
local governments and other Federal agencies.
    (d) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $3,000,000 for each fiscal year.
SEC. 2018. <<NOTE: 33 USC 426e-1.>> SHORE PROTECTION PROJECTS.

    (a) In General.--In accordance with the Act of July 3, 1930 (33 
U.S.C. 426), and notwithstanding administrative actions, it is the 
policy of the United States to promote beach nourishment for the 
purposes of flood damage reduction and hurricane and storm damage 
reduction and related research that encourage the protection, 
restoration, and enhancement of sandy beaches, including beach 
restoration and periodic beach renourishment for a period of 50 years, 
on a comprehensive and coordinated basis by the Federal Government, 
States, localities, and private enterprises.
    (b) Preference.--In carrying out the policy under subsection (a), 
preference shall be given to--
            (1) areas in which there has been a Federal investment of 
        funds for the purposes described in subsection (a); and
            (2) areas with respect to which the need for prevention or 
        mitigation of damage to shores and beaches is attributable to 
        Federal navigation projects or other Federal activities.

    (c) Applicability.--The Secretary shall apply the policy under 
subsection (a) to each shore protection and beach renourishment

[[Page 121 STAT. 1078]]

project (including shore protection and beach renourishment projects 
constructed before the date of enactment of this Act).
SEC. 2019. ABILITY TO PAY.

    (a) Criteria and Procedures.--Section 103(m)(2) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2213(m)(2)) is amended by 
striking ``180 days after such date of enactment'' and inserting 
``December 31, 2007''.
    (b) Projects.--The <<NOTE: Applicability.>> Secretary shall apply 
the criteria and procedures referred to in section 103(m) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2213(m)) to the following 
projects:
            (1) St. johns bayou and new madrid floodway, missouri.--The 
        project for flood control, St. Johns Bayou and New Madrid 
        Floodway, Missouri, authorized by section 401(a) of the Water 
        Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4118).
            (2) Lower rio grande basin, texas.--The project for flood 
        control, Lower Rio Grande Basin, Texas, authorized by section 
        401(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 
        4125).
            (3) West virginia and pennsylvania projects.--The projects 
        for flood control authorized by section 581 of the Water 
        Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3790-3791).
SEC. 2020. AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM AND ESTUARY RESTORATION.

    Section 206 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (33 
U.S.C. 2330; 110 Stat. 3679) is amended--
            (1) by striking subsection (a) and inserting the following:

    ``(a) General Authority.--
            ``(1) In general.--The Secretary may carry out a project to 
        restore and protect an aquatic ecosystem or estuary if the 
        Secretary determines that the project--
                    ``(A)(i) will improve the quality of the environment 
                and is in the public interest; or
                    ``(ii) will improve the elements and features of an 
                estuary (as defined in section 103 of the Estuaries and 
                Clean Waters Act of 2000 (33 U.S.C. 2902)); and
                    ``(B) is cost-effective.
            ``(2) Dam removal.--A project under this section may include 
        removal of a dam.''; and
            (2) in subsection (e) by striking ``$25,000,000'' and 
        inserting ``$50,000,000''.
SEC. 2021. SMALL FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION PROJECTS.

    Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s) is 
amended by striking ``$50,000,000'' and inserting ``$55,000,000''.
SEC. 2022. SMALL RIVER AND HARBOR IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS.

    Section 107(b) of the River and Harbor Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 
577(b)) is amended by striking ``$4,000,000'' and inserting 
``$7,000,000''.
SEC. 2023. PROTECTION OF HIGHWAYS, BRIDGE APPROACHES, PUBLIC 
                          WORKS, AND NONPROFIT PUBLIC SERVICES.

    Section 14 of the Flood Control Act of 1946 (33 U.S.C. 701r) is 
amended by striking ``$1,000,000'' and inserting ``$1,500,000''.

[[Page 121 STAT. 1079]]

SEC. 2024. MODIFICATION OF PROJECTS FOR IMPROVEMENT OF THE QUALITY 
                          OF THE ENVIRONMENT.

    Section 1135(h) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 
U.S.C. 2309a(h)) is amended by striking ``$25,000,000'' and inserting 
``$40,000,000''.
SEC. 2025. REMEDIATION OF ABANDONED MINE SITES.

    Section 560(f) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (33 
U.S.C. 2336(f)) is amended by striking ``$7,500,000'' and inserting 
``$20,000,000''.
SEC. 2026. LEASING AUTHORITY.

    Section 4 of the Act entitled ``An Act authorizing the construction 
of certain public works on rivers and harbors for flood control, and 
other purposes'', approved December 22, 1944 (16 U.S.C. 460d), is 
amended--
            (1) by inserting ``federally recognized Indian tribes and'' 
        before ``Federal'' the first place it appears;
            (2) by inserting ``Indian tribes or'' after 
        ``considerations, to such''; and
            (3) by inserting ``federally recognized Indian tribe'' after 
        ``That in any such lease or license to a''.
SEC. 2027. <<NOTE: 10 USC 3036 note.>> FISCAL TRANSPARENCY REPORT.

    (a) In General.--On the third Tuesday of January of each year 
beginning January 2008, the Chief of Engineers shall submit to the 
Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate and the 
Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of 
Representatives a report on--
            (1) the expenditures by the Corps for the preceding fiscal 
        year and estimated expenditures by the Corps for the current 
        fiscal year; and
            (2) for projects and activities that are not scheduled for 
        completion in the current fiscal year, the estimated 
        expenditures by the Corps necessary in the following fiscal year 
        for each project or activity to maintain the same level of 
        effort being achieved in the current fiscal year.

    (b) Contents.--In addition to the information described in 
subsection (a), the report shall contain a detailed accounting of the 
following information:
            (1) With respect to activities carried out with funding 
        provided under the Construction appropriations account for the 
        Secretary, information on--
                    (A) projects currently under construction, 
                including--
                          (i) allocations to date;
                          (ii) the number of years remaining to complete 
                      construction;
                          (iii) the estimated annual Federal cost to 
                      maintain that construction schedule; and
                          (iv) a list of projects the Corps of Engineers 
                      expects to complete during the current fiscal 
                      year; and
                    (B) projects for which there is a signed partnership 
                agreement and completed planning, engineering, and 
                design, including--
                          (i) the number of years the project is 
                      expected to require for completion; and
                          (ii) estimated annual Federal cost to maintain 
                      that construction schedule.

[[Page 121 STAT. 1080]]

            (2) With respect to operation and maintenance of the inland 
        and intracoastal waterways identified by section 206 of the 
        Inland Waterways Revenue Act of 1978 (33 U.S.C. 1804)--
                    (A) the estimated annual cost to maintain each 
                waterway for the authorized reach and at the authorized 
                depth;
                    (B) the estimated annual cost of operation and 
                maintenance of locks and dams to ensure navigation 
                without interruption; and
                    (C) the actual expenditures to maintain each 
                waterway.
            (3) With respect to activities carried out with funding 
        provided under the Investigations appropriations account for the 
        Secretary--
                    (A) the number of active studies;
                    (B) the number of completed studies not yet 
                authorized for construction;
                    (C) the number of initiated studies; and
                    (D) the number of studies expected to be completed 
                during the fiscal year.
            (4) Funding received and estimates of funds to be received 
        for interagency and international support activities under 
        section 234 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (33 
        U.S.C. 2323a).
            (5) Recreation fees and lease payments.
            (6) Hydropower and water storage receipts.
            (7) Deposits into the Inland Waterways Trust Fund and the 
        Harbor Maintenance Trust Fund.
            (8) Other revenues and fees collected by the Corps of 
        Engineers.
            (9) With respect to permit applications and notifications, a 
        list of individual permit applications and nationwide permit 
        notifications, including--
                    (A) the date on which each permit application is 
                filed;
                    (B) the date on which each permit application is 
                determined to be complete;
                    (C) the date on which any permit application is 
                withdrawn; and
                    (D) the date on which the Corps of Engineers grants 
                or denies each permit.
            (10) With respect to projects that are authorized but for 
        which construction is not complete, a list of such projects for 
        which no funds have been allocated for the 5 preceding fiscal 
        years, including, for each project--
                    (A) the authorization date;
                    (B) the last allocation date;
                    (C) the percentage of construction completed;
                    (D) the estimated cost remaining until completion of 
                the project; and
                    (E) a brief explanation of the reasons for the 
                delay.
SEC. 2028. SUPPORT OF ARMY CIVIL WORKS PROGRAM.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding section 2361 of title 10, United 
States Code, the Secretary may provide assistance through contracts, 
cooperative agreements, and grants to--
            (1) the University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, for 
        establishment and operation of the Southeastern Water Resources 
        Institute to study sustainable development and utilization of 
        water resources in the southeastern United States;

[[Page 121 STAT. 1081]]

            (2) Lewis and Clark Community College, Illinois, for the 
        Great Rivers National Research and Education Center (including 
        facilities that have been or will be constructed at one or more 
        locations in the vicinity of the confluence of the Illinois 
        River, the Missouri River, and the Mississippi River), a 
        collaborative effort of Lewis and Clark Community College, the 
        University of Illinois, the Illinois Department of Natural 
        Resources and Environmental Sciences, and other entities, for 
        the study of river ecology, developing watershed and river 
        management strategies, and educating students and the public on 
        river issues; and
            (3) the University of Texas at Dallas for support and 
        operation of the International Center for Decision and Risk 
        Analysis to study risk analysis and control methods for 
        transboundary water resources management in the southwestern 
        United States and other international water resources management 
        problems.

    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--There are authorized to be 
appropriated to the Secretary to carry out subsection (a)(1) $2,000,000, 
to carry out subsection (a)(2) $2,000,000, and to carry out subsection 
(a)(3) $5,000,000.
SEC. 2029. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON CRITERIA FOR OPERATION AND 
                          MAINTENANCE OF HARBOR DREDGING PROJECTS.

    (a) Findings.--Congress finds the following:
            (1) Insufficient maintenance dredging results in inefficient 
        water transportation and harmful economic consequences.
            (2) The estimated dredging backlog at commercial harbors in 
        the Great Lakes alone is 16,000,000 cubic yards.
            (3) Approximately two-thirds of all shipping in the United 
        States either starts or finishes at small harbors.
            (4) Small harbors often have a greater proportional impact 
        on local economies than do larger harbors.
            (5) Performance metrics can be valuable tools in the budget 
        process for water resources projects.
            (6) The use of a single performance metric for water 
        resources projects can result in a budget biased against small 
        and rural communities.

    (b) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that the 
operations and maintenance budget of the Corps of Engineers should 
reflect the use of all available economic data, rather than a single 
performance metric.
SEC. 2030. INTERAGENCY AND INTERNATIONAL SUPPORT AUTHORITY.

    Section 234 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (33 
U.S.C. 2323a) is amended--
            (1) by striking subsection (a) and inserting the following:

    ``(a) In General.--The Secretary may engage in activities (including 
contracting) in support of other Federal agencies, international 
organizations, or foreign governments to address problems of national 
significance to the United States.'';
            (2) in subsection (b) by striking ``Secretary of State'' and 
        inserting ``Department of State''; and
            (3) in subsection (d)--
                    (A) by striking ``$250,000 for fiscal year 2001'' 
                and inserting ``$1,000,000 for fiscal year 2008''; and

[[Page 121 STAT. 1082]]

                    (B) by striking ``or international organizations'' 
                and inserting ``, international organizations, or 
                foreign governments''.
SEC. 2031. <<NOTE: 42 USC 1962-3.>> WATER RESOURCES PRINCIPLES AND 
                          GUIDELINES.

    (a) National Water Resources Planning Policy.--It is the policy of 
the United States that all water resources projects should reflect 
national priorities, encourage economic development, and protect the 
environment by--
            (1) seeking to maximize sustainable economic development;
            (2) seeking to avoid the unwise use of floodplains and 
        flood-prone areas and minimizing adverse impacts and 
        vulnerabilities in any case in which a floodplain or flood-prone 
        area must be used; and
            (3) protecting and restoring the functions of natural 
        systems and mitigating any unavoidable damage to natural 
        systems.

    (b) Principles and Guidelines.--
            (1) Principles and guidelines defined.--In this subsection, 
        the term ``principles and guidelines'' means the principles and 
        guidelines contained in the document prepared by the Water 
        Resources Council pursuant to section 103 of the Water Resources 
        Planning Act (42 U.S.C. 1962a-2), entitled ``Economic and 
        Environmental Principles and Guidelines for Water and Related 
        Land Resources Implementation Studies'', and dated March 10, 
        1983.
            (2) In general.--Not <<NOTE: Deadline. Revisions.>> later 
        than 2 years after the date of enactment of this Act, the 
        Secretary shall issue revisions, consistent with paragraph (3), 
        to the principles and guidelines for use by the Secretary in the 
        formulation, evaluation, and implementation of water resources 
        projects.
            (3) Considerations.--In <<NOTE: Evaluation.>> developing 
        revisions to the principles and guidelines under paragraph (2), 
        the Secretary shall evaluate the consistency of the principles 
        and guidelines with, and ensure that the principles and 
        guidelines address, the following:
                    (A) The use of best available economic principles 
                and analytical techniques, including techniques in risk 
                and uncertainty analysis.
                    (B) The assessment and incorporation of public 
                safety in the formulation of alternatives and 
                recommended plans.
                    (C) Assessment methods that reflect the value of 
                projects for low-income communities and projects that 
                use nonstructural approaches to water resources 
                development and management.
                    (D) The assessment and evaluation of the interaction 
                of a project with other water resources projects and 
                programs within a region or watershed.
                    (E) The use of contemporary water resources 
                paradigms, including integrated water resources 
                management and adaptive management.
                    (F) Evaluation methods that ensure that water 
                resources projects are justified by public benefits.
            (4) Consultation and public participation.--In carrying out 
        paragraph (2), the Secretary shall--

[[Page 121 STAT. 1083]]

                    (A) consult with the Secretary of the Interior, the 
                Secretary of Agriculture, the Secretary of Commerce, the 
                Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, the 
                Secretary of Transportation, the Administrator of the 
                Environmental Protection Agency, the Secretary of 
                Energy, the Secretary of Homeland Security, the National 
                Academy of Sciences, and the Council on Environmental 
                Quality; and
                    (B) solicit and consider public and expert comments.
            (5) Publication.--The Secretary shall--
                    (A) <<NOTE: Revisions.>> submit to the Committee on 
                Environment and Public Works of the Senate and the 
                Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the 
                House of Representatives copies of--
                          (i) the revisions to the principles and 
                      guidelines for use by the Secretary; and
                          (ii) an explanation of the intent of each 
                      revision, how each revision is consistent with 
                      this section, and the probable impact of each 
                      revision on water resources projects carried out 
                      by the Secretary; and
                    (B) <<NOTE: Public information. Internet.>> make the 
                revisions to the principles and guidelines for use by 
                the Secretary available to the public, including on the 
                Internet.
            (6) Effect.--Subject to the requirements of this subsection, 
        the principles and guidelines as revised under this subsection 
        shall apply to water resources projects carried out by the 
        Secretary instead of the principles and guidelines for such 
        projects in effect on the day before date of enactment of this 
        Act.
            (7) Applicability.--After the date of issuance of the 
        revisions to the principles and guidelines, the revisions shall 
        apply--
                    (A) to all water resources projects carried out by 
                the Secretary, other than projects for which the 
                Secretary has commenced a feasibility study before the 
                date of such issuance;
                    (B) at the request of a non-Federal interest, to a 
                water resources project for which the Secretary has 
                commenced a feasibility study before the date of such 
                issuance; and
                    (C) to the reevaluation or modification of a water 
                resources project, other than a reevaluation or 
                modification that has been commenced by the Secretary 
                before the date of such issuance.
            (8) Existing studies.--Revisions to the principles and 
        guidelines issued under paragraph (2) shall not affect the 
        validity of any completed study of a water resources project.
            (9) Recommendation.--Upon completion of the revisions to the 
        principles and guidelines for use by the Secretary, the 
        Secretary shall make a recommendation to Congress as to the 
        advisability of repealing subsections (a) and (b) of section 80 
        of the Water Resources Development Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-
        17).
SEC. 2032. WATER RESOURCE PRIORITIES REPORT.

    (a) In General.--Not <<NOTE: President.>> later than 2 years after 
the date of enactment of this Act, the President shall submit to 
Congress a report describing the vulnerability of the United States to 
damage from flooding, including--
            (1) the risk to human life;

[[Page 121 STAT. 1084]]

            (2) the risk to property; and
            (3) the comparative risks faced by different regions of the 
        United States.

    (b) Inclusions.--The report under subsection (a) shall include--
            (1) an assessment of the extent to which programs in the 
        United States relating to flooding address flood risk reduction 
        priorities;
            (2) the extent to which those programs may be encouraging 
        development and economic activity in flood-prone areas;
            (3) recommendations for improving those programs with 
        respect to reducing and responding to flood risks; and
            (4) proposals for implementing the recommendations.
SEC. 2033. <<NOTE: 33 USC 2282a.>> PLANNING.

    (a) Matters to Be Addressed in Planning.--Section 904 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2281) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``Enhancing'' and inserting the following:

    ``(a) In General.--Enhancing''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:

    ``(b) Assessments.--For <<NOTE: Effective date.>> all feasibility 
reports for water resources projects completed after December 31, 2007, 
the Secretary shall assess whether--
            ``(1) the water resources project and each separable element 
        is cost-effective; and
            ``(2) the water resources project complies with Federal, 
        State, and local laws (including regulations) and public 
        policies.''.

    (b) Planning Process Improvements.--The Chief of Engineers--
            (1) shall adopt a risk analysis approach to project cost 
        estimates for water resources projects; and
            (2) <<NOTE: Deadline.>> not later than one year after the 
        date of enactment of this Act, shall--
                    (A) <<NOTE: Procedures.>> issue procedures for risk 
                analysis for cost estimation for water resources 
                projects; and
                    (B) <<NOTE: Reports.>> submit to Congress a report 
                that includes any recommended amendments to section 902 
                of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 
                U.S.C. 2280).

    (c) <<NOTE: Deadlines.>> Benchmarks.--
            (1) In general.--Not later than 12 months after the date of 
        enactment of this Act, the Chief of Engineers shall establish 
        benchmarks for determining the length of time it should take to 
        conduct a feasibility study for a water resources project and 
        its associated review process under the National Environmental 
        Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.). The Chief of 
        Engineers shall use such benchmarks as a management tool to make 
        the feasibility study process more efficient in all districts of 
        the Corps of Engineers.
            (2) Benchmark goals.--The Chief of Engineers shall 
        establish, to the extent practicable, under paragraph (1) 
        benchmark goals for completion of feasibility studies for water 
        resources projects generally within 2 years. In the case of 
        feasibility studies that the Chief of Engineers determines may 
        require additional time based on the project type, size, cost,

[[Page 121 STAT. 1085]]

        or complexity, the benchmark goal for completion shall be 
        generally within 4 years.

     (d) Calculation of Benefits and Costs for Flood Damage Reduction 
Projects.--A feasibility study for a project for flood damage reduction 
shall include, as part of the calculation of benefits and costs--
            (1) a calculation of the residual risk of flooding following 
        completion of the proposed project;
            (2) a calculation of the residual risk of loss of human life 
        and residual risk to human safety following completion of the 
        proposed project;
            (3) a calculation of any upstream or downstream impacts of 
        the proposed project; and
            (4) calculations to ensure that the benefits and costs 
        associated with structural and nonstructural alternatives are 
        evaluated in an equitable manner.

    (e) Centers of Specialized Planning Expertise.--
            (1) Establishment.--The Secretary may establish centers of 
        expertise to provide specialized planning expertise for water 
        resources projects to be carried out by the Secretary in order 
        to enhance and supplement the capabilities of the districts of 
        the Corps of Engineers.
            (2) Duties.--A center of expertise established under this 
        subsection shall--
                    (A) provide technical and managerial assistance to 
                district commanders of the Corps of Engineers for 
                project planning, development, and implementation;
                    (B) provide agency peer reviews of new major 
                scientific, engineering, or economic methods, models, or 
                analyses that will be used to support decisions of the 
                Secretary with respect to feasibility studies for water 
                resources projects;
                    (C) provide support for independent peer review 
                panels under section 2034; and
                    (D) carry out such other duties as are prescribed by 
                the Secretary.

    (f) Completion of Corps of Engineers Reports.--
            (1) Alternatives.--
                    (A) In general.--Feasibility and other studies and 
                assessments for a water resources project shall include 
                recommendations for alternatives--
                          (i) that, as determined in coordination with 
                      the non-Federal interest for the project, promote 
                      integrated water resources management; and
                          (ii) for which the non-Federal interest is 
                      willing to provide the non-Federal share for the 
                      studies or assessments.
                    (B) Constraints.--The alternatives contained in 
                studies and assessments described in subparagraph (A) 
                shall not be constrained by budgetary or other policy.
                    (C) Reports of chief of engineers.--The reports of 
                the Chief of Engineers shall identify any recommendation 
                that is not the best technical solution to water 
                resource needs and problems and the reason for the 
                deviation.
            (2) Report completion.--The completion of a report of the 
        Chief of Engineers for a water resources project--

[[Page 121 STAT. 1086]]

                    (A) shall not be delayed while consideration is 
                being given to potential changes in policy or priority 
                for project consideration; and
                    (B) shall be submitted, on completion, to--
                          (i) the Committee on Environment and Public 
                      Works of the Senate; and
                          (ii) the Committee on Transportation and 
                      Infrastructure of the House of Representatives.

    (g) <<NOTE: Deadlines.>> Completion Review.--
            (1) In general.--Except as provided in paragraph (2), not 
        later than 120 days after the date of completion of a report of 
        the Chief of Engineers that recommends to Congress a water 
        resources project, the Secretary shall--
                    (A) review the report; and
                    (B) provide any recommendations of the Secretary 
                regarding the water resources project to Congress.
            (2) Prior reports.--Not later than 180 days after the date 
        of enactment of this Act, with respect to any report of the 
        Chief of Engineers recommending a water resources project that 
        is complete prior to the date of enactment of this Act, the 
        Secretary shall complete review of, and provide recommendations 
        to Congress for, the report in accordance with paragraph (1).
SEC. 2034. <<NOTE: 33 USC 2343.>> INDEPENDENT PEER REVIEW.

    (a) Project Studies Subject to Independent Peer Review.--
            (1) In general.--Project studies shall be subject to a peer 
        review by an independent panel of experts as determined under 
        this section.
            (2) Scope.--The peer review may include a review of the 
        economic and environmental assumptions and projections, project 
        evaluation data, economic analyses, environmental analyses, 
        engineering analyses, formulation of alternative plans, methods 
        for integrating risk and uncertainty, models used in evaluation 
        of economic or environmental impacts of proposed projects, and 
        any biological opinions of the project study.
            (3) Project studies subject to peer review.--
                    (A) Mandatory.--A project study shall be subject to 
                peer review under paragraph (1) if--
                          (i) the project has an estimated total cost of 
                      more than $45,000,000, including mitigation costs, 
                      and is not determined by the Chief of Engineers to 
                      be exempt from peer review under paragraph (6);
                          (ii) the Governor of an affected State 
                      requests a peer review by an independent panel of 
                      experts; or
                          (iii) the Chief of Engineers determines that 
                      the project study is controversial considering the 
                      factors set forth in paragraph (4).
                    (B) Discretionary.--
                          (i) Agency request.--A project study shall be 
                      considered by the Chief of Engineers for peer 
                      review under this section if the head of a Federal 
                      or State agency charged with reviewing the project 
                      study determines that the project is likely to 
                      have a significant adverse impact on 
                      environmental, cultural, or other resources under 
                      the jurisdiction of the agency after 
                      implementation of proposed mitigation plans and

[[Page 121 STAT. 1087]]

                      requests a peer review by an independent panel of 
                      experts.
                          (ii) Deadline for decision.--A decision of the 
                      Chief of Engineers under this subparagraph whether 
                      to conduct a peer review shall be made within 21 
                      days of the date of receipt of the request by the 
                      head of the Federal or State agency under clause 
                      (i).
                          (iii) Reasons for not conducting peer 
                      review.--If the Chief of Engineers decides not to 
                      conduct a peer review following a request under 
                      clause (i), the Chief shall make publicly 
                      available, including on the Internet, the reasons 
                      for not conducting the peer review.
                          (iv) <<NOTE: Deadlines.>> Appeal to chairman 
                      of council on environmental quality.--A decision 
                      by the Chief of Engineers not to conduct a peer 
                      review following a request under clause (i) shall 
                      be subject to appeal by a person referred to in 
                      clause (i) to the Chairman of the Council on 
                      Environmental Quality if such appeal is made 
                      within the 30-day period following the date of the 
                      decision being made available under clause (iii). 
                      A decision of the Chairman on an appeal under this 
                      clause shall be made within 30 days of the date of 
                      the appeal.
            (4) Factors to consider.--In determining whether a project 
        study is controversial under paragraph (3)(A)(iii), the Chief of 
        Engineers shall consider if--
                    (A) there is a significant public dispute as to the 
                size, nature, or effects of the project; or
                    (B) there is a significant public dispute as to the 
                economic or environmental costs or benefits of the 
                project.
            (5) Project studies excluded from peer review.--The Chief of 
        Engineers may exclude a project study from peer review under 
        paragraph (1)--
                    (A) if the project study does not include an 
                environmental impact statement and is a project study 
                subject to peer review under paragraph (3)(A)(i) that 
                the Chief of Engineers determines--
                          (i) is not controversial;
                          (ii) has no more than negligible adverse 
                      impacts on scarce or unique cultural, historic, or 
                      tribal resources;
                          (iii) has no substantial adverse impacts on 
                      fish and wildlife species and their habitat prior 
                      to the implementation of mitigation measures; and
                          (iv) has, before implementation of mitigation 
                      measures, no more than a negligible adverse impact 
                      on a species listed as endangered or threatened 
                      species under the Endangered Species Act of 1973 
                      (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) or the critical habitat 
                      of such species designated under such Act;
                    (B) if the project study--
                          (i) involves only the rehabilitation or 
                      replacement of existing hydropower turbines, lock 
                      structures, or flood control gates within the same 
                      footprint and for the same purpose as an existing 
                      water resources project;

[[Page 121 STAT. 1088]]

                          (ii) is for an activity for which there is 
                      ample experience within the Corps of Engineers and 
                      industry to treat the activity as being routine; 
                      and
                          (iii) has minimal life safety risk; or
                    (C) if the project study does not include an 
                environmental impact statement and is a project study 
                pursued under section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 
                1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s), section 2 of the Flood Control 
                Act of August 28, 1937 (33 U.S.C. 701g), section 14 of 
                the Flood Control Act of 1946 (33 U.S.C. 701r), section 
                107(a) of the River and Harbor Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 
                577(a)), section 3 of the Act entitled ``An Act 
                authorizing Federal participation in the cost of 
                protecting the shores of publicly owned property'', 
                approved August 13, 1946 (33 U.S.C. 426g), section 111 
                of the River and Harbor Act of 1968 (33 U.S.C. 426i), 
                section 3 of the Act entitled ``An Act authorizing the 
                construction, repair, and preservation of certain public 
                works on rivers and harbors, and for other purposes'', 
                approved March 2, 1945 (33 U.S.C. 603a), section 1135 of 
                the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 
                2309a), or section 206 of the Water Resources 
                Development Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 2330).
            (6) Determination of total cost.--For purposes of 
        determining the estimated total cost of a project under 
        paragraph (3)(A), the total cost shall be based upon the 
        reasonable estimates of the Chief of Engineers at the completion 
        of the reconnaissance study for the project. If the reasonable 
        estimate of total costs is subsequently determined to be in 
        excess of the amount in paragraph (3)(A), the Chief of Engineers 
        shall make a determination whether a project study is required 
        to be reviewed under this section.

    (b) Timing of Peer Review.--
            (1) In general.--The Chief of Engineers shall determine the 
        timing of a peer review of a project study under subsection (a). 
        In all cases, the peer review shall occur during the period 
        beginning on the date of the signing of the feasibility cost-
        sharing agreement for the study and ending on the date 
        established under subsection (e)(1)(A) for the peer review and 
        shall be accomplished concurrent with the conducting of the 
        project study.
            (2) Factors to consider.--In any case in which the Chief of 
        Engineers has not initiated a peer review of a project study, 
        the Chief of Engineers shall consider, at a minimum, whether to 
        initiate a peer review at the time that--
                    (A) the without-project conditions are identified;
                    (B) the array of alternatives to be considered are 
                identified; and
                    (C) the preferred alternative is identified.
            (3) Limitation on multiple peer review.--Nothing in this 
        subsection shall be construed to require the Chief of Engineers 
        to conduct multiple peer reviews for a project study.

    (c) Establishment of Panels.--
            (1) In general.--For each project study subject to peer 
        review under subsection (a), as soon as practicable after the 
        Chief of Engineers determines that a project study will be 
        subject to peer review, the Chief of Engineers shall contract 
        with the National Academy of Sciences or a similar independent

[[Page 121 STAT. 1089]]

        scientific and technical advisory organization or an eligible 
        organization to establish a panel of experts to conduct a peer 
        review for the project study.
            (2) Membership.--A panel of experts established for a 
        project study under this section shall be composed of 
        independent experts who represent a balance of areas of 
        expertise suitable for the review being conducted.
            (3) Limitation on appointments.--The National Academy of 
        Sciences or any other organization the Chief of Engineers 
        contracts with under paragraph (1) to establish a panel of 
        experts shall apply the National Academy of Science's policy for 
        selecting committee members to ensure that members selected for 
        the panel of experts have no conflict with the project being 
        reviewed.
            (4) Congressional notification.--Upon identification of a 
        project study for peer review under this section, but prior to 
        initiation of the review, the Chief of Engineers shall notify 
        the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate and 
        the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House 
        of Representatives of the review.

    (d) Duties of Panels.--A panel of experts established for a peer 
review for a project study under this section shall--
            (1) conduct the peer review for the project study;
            (2) assess the adequacy and acceptability of the economic, 
        engineering, and environmental methods, models, and analyses 
        used by the Chief of Engineers;
            (3) receive from the Chief of Engineers the public written 
        and oral comments provided to the Chief of Engineers;
            (4) provide timely written and oral comments to the Chief of 
        Engineers throughout the development of the project study, as 
        requested; and
            (5) <<NOTE: Reports.>> submit to the Chief of Engineers a 
        final report containing the panel's economic, engineering, and 
        environmental analysis of the project study, including the 
        panel's assessment of the adequacy and acceptability of the 
        economic, engineering, and environmental methods, models, and 
        analyses used by the Chief of Engineers, to accompany the 
        publication of the report of the Chief of Engineers for the 
        project.

    (e) Duration of Project Study Peer Reviews.--
            (1) Deadline.--A panel of experts established under this 
        section shall--
                    (A) <<NOTE: Reports.>> complete its peer review 
                under this section for a project study and submit a 
                report to the Chief of Engineers under subsection (d)(5) 
                not more than 60 days after the last day of the public 
                comment period for the draft project study, or, if the 
                Chief of Engineers determines that a longer period of 
                time is necessary, such period of time determined 
                necessary by the Chief of Engineers; and
                    (B) <<NOTE: Termination date.>> terminate on the 
                date of initiation of the State and agency review 
                required by the first section of the Flood Control Act 
                of December 22, 1944 (58 Stat. 887).
            (2) Failure to meet deadline.--If a panel of experts does 
        not complete its peer review of a project study under this 
        section and submit a report to the Chief of Engineers under 
        subsection (d)(5) on or before the deadline established by 
        paragraph (1) for the peer review, the Chief of Engineers shall 
        complete the project study without delay.

[[Page 121 STAT. 1090]]

    (f) Recommendations of Panel.--
            (1) Consideration by the chief of engineers.--After 
        receiving a report on a project study from a panel of experts 
        under this section and before entering a final record of 
        decision for the project, the Chief of Engineers shall consider 
        any recommendations contained in the report and prepare a 
        written response for any recommendations adopted or not adopted.
            (2) Public availability and transmittal to congress.--After 
        receiving a report on a project study from a panel of experts 
        under this section, the Chief of Engineers shall--
                    (A) <<NOTE: Internet.>> make a copy of the report 
                and any written response of the Chief of Engineers on 
                recommendations contained in the report available to the 
                public by electronic means, including the Internet; and
                    (B) transmit to the Committee on Environment and 
                Public Works of the Senate and the Committee on 
                Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of 
                Representatives a copy of the report, together with any 
                such written response, on the date of a final report of 
                the Chief of Engineers or other final decision document 
                for the project study.

    (g) Costs.--
            (1) In general.--The costs of a panel of experts established 
        for a peer review under this section--
                    (A) shall be a Federal expense; and
                    (B) shall not exceed $500,000.
            (2) Waiver.--The Chief of Engineers may waive the $500,000 
        limitation contained in paragraph (1)(B) in cases that the Chief 
        of Engineers determines appropriate.

    (h) Applicability.--This <<NOTE: Effective date. Termination 
date.>> section shall apply to--
            (1) project studies initiated during the 2-year period 
        preceding the date of enactment of this Act and for which the 
        array of alternatives to be considered has not been identified; 
        and
            (2) project studies initiated during the period beginning on 
        such date of enactment and ending 7 years after such date of 
        enactment.

    (i) Reports.--
            (1) Initial report.--Not later than 3 years after the date 
        of enactment of this section, the Chief of Engineers shall 
        submit to the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the 
        Senate and the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of 
        the House of Representatives a report on the implementation of 
        this section.
            (2) Additional report.--Not later than 6 years after the 
        date of enactment of this section, the Chief of Engineers shall 
        update the report under paragraph (1) taking into account any 
        further information on implementation of this section and submit 
        such updated report to the Committee on Environment and Public 
        Works of the Senate and the Committee on Transportation and 
        Infrastructure of the House of Representatives.

    (j) Nonapplicability of FACA.--The Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 
U.S.C. App.) shall not apply to a peer review panel established under 
this section.
    (k) Savings Clause.--Nothing in this section shall be construed to 
affect any authority of the Chief of Engineers to cause or conduct

[[Page 121 STAT. 1091]]

a peer review of a water resources project existing on the date of 
enactment of this section.
    (l) Definitions.--In this section, the following definitions apply:
            (1) Project study.--The term ``project study'' means--
                    (A) a feasibility study or reevaluation study for a 
                water resources project, including the environmental 
                impact statement prepared for the study; and
                    (B) any other study associated with a modification 
                of a water resources project that includes an 
                environmental impact statement, including the 
                environmental impact statement prepared for the study.
            (2) Affected state.--The term ``affected State'', as used 
        with respect to a water resources project, means a State all or 
        a portion of which is within the drainage basin in which the 
        project is or would be located and would be economically or 
        environmentally affected as a consequence of the project.
            (3) Eligible organization.--The term ``eligible 
        organization'' means an organization that--
                    (A) is described in section 501(c)(3), and exempt 
                from Federal tax under section 501(a), of the Internal 
                Revenue Code of 1986;
                    (B) is independent;
                    (C) is free from conflicts of interest;
                    (D) does not carry out or advocate for or against 
                Federal water resources projects; and
                    (E) has experience in establishing and administering 
                peer review panels.
            (4) Total cost.--The term ``total cost'', as used with 
        respect to a water resources project, means the cost of 
        construction (including planning and designing) of the project. 
        In the case of a project for hurricane and storm damage 
        reduction or flood damage reduction that includes periodic 
        nourishment over the life of the project, the term includes the 
        total cost of the nourishment.
SEC. 2035. <<NOTE: 33 USC 2344.>> SAFETY ASSURANCE REVIEW.

    (a) Projects Subject to Safety Assurance Review.--The Chief of 
Engineers shall ensure that the design and construction activities for 
hurricane and storm damage reduction and flood damage reduction projects 
are reviewed by independent experts under this section if the Chief of 
Engineers determines that a review by independent experts is necessary 
to assure public health, safety, and welfare.
    (b) Factors.--In determining whether a review of design and 
construction of a project is necessary under this section, the Chief of 
Engineers shall consider whether--
            (1) the failure of the project would pose a significant 
        threat to human life;
            (2) the project involves the use of innovative materials or 
        techniques;
            (3) the project design lacks redundancy; or
            (4) the project has a unique construction sequencing or a 
        reduced or overlapping design construction schedule.

    (c) Safety Assurance Review.--
            (1) Initiation of review.--At the appropriate point in the 
        development of detailed engineering and design specifications 
        for each water resources project subject to review under

[[Page 121 STAT. 1092]]

        this section, the Chief of Engineers shall initiate a safety 
        assurance review by independent experts on the design and 
        construction activities for the project.
            (2) Selection of reviewers.--A safety assurance review under 
        this section shall include participation by experts selected by 
        the Chief of Engineers from among individuals who are 
        distinguished experts in engineering, hydrology, or other 
        appropriate disciplines. <<NOTE: Applicability.>> The Chief of 
        Engineers shall apply the National Academy of Science's policy 
        for selecting reviewers to ensure that reviewers have no 
        conflict of interest with the project being reviewed.
            (3) Compensation.--An individual serving as an independent 
        reviewer under this section shall be compensated at a rate of 
        pay to be determined by the Secretary and shall be allowed 
        travel expenses.

    (d) Scope of Safety Assurance Reviews.--A safety assurance review 
under this section shall include a review of the design and construction 
activities prior to the initiation of physical construction and 
periodically thereafter until construction activities are completed on a 
regular schedule sufficient to inform the Chief of Engineers on the 
adequacy, appropriateness, and acceptability of the design and 
construction activities for the purpose of assuring public health, 
safety, and welfare. The Chief of Engineers shall ensure that reviews 
under this section do not create any unnecessary delays in design and 
construction activities.
    (e) Safety Assurance Review Record.--The <<NOTE: Public 
information. Internet.>> written recommendations of a reviewer or panel 
of reviewers under this section and the responses of the Chief of 
Engineers shall be available to the public, including through electronic 
means on the Internet.

    (f) Applicability.--This <<NOTE: Effective date. Termination 
date.>> section shall apply to any project in design or under 
construction on the date of enactment of this Act and to any project 
with respect to which design or construction is initiated during the 
period beginning on the date of enactment of this Act and ending 7 years 
after such date of enactment.
SEC. 2036. MITIGATION FOR FISH AND WILDLIFE AND WETLANDS LOSSES.

    (a) Mitigation for Fish and Wildlife Losses.--Section 906(d) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2283(d)) is amended--
            (1) in the first sentence of paragraph (1) by striking ``to 
        the Congress'' and inserting ``to Congress in any report, and 
        shall not select a project alternative in any report,'';
            (2) in the second sentence of paragraph (1) by inserting ``, 
        and other habitat types are mitigated to not less than in-kind 
        conditions'' after ``mitigated in-kind''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(3) Mitigation requirements.--
                    ``(A) In general.--To mitigate losses to flood 
                damage reduction capabilities and fish and wildlife 
                resulting from a water resources project, the Secretary 
                shall ensure that the mitigation plan for each water 
                resources project complies with the mitigation standards 
                and policies established pursuant to the regulatory 
                programs administered by the Secretary.

[[Page 121 STAT. 1093]]

                    ``(B) Inclusions.--A specific mitigation plan for a 
                water resources project under paragraph (1) shall 
                include, at a minimum--
                          ``(i) a plan for monitoring the implementation 
                      and ecological success of each mitigation measure, 
                      including the cost and duration of any monitoring, 
                      and, to the extent practicable, a designation of 
                      the entities that will be responsible for the 
                      monitoring;
                          ``(ii) the criteria for ecological success by 
                      which the mitigation will be evaluated and 
                      determined to be successful based on replacement 
                      of lost functions and values of the habitat, 
                      including hydrologic and vegetative 
                      characteristics;
                          ``(iii) a description of the land and 
                      interests in land to be acquired for the 
                      mitigation plan and the basis for a determination 
                      that the land and interests are available for 
                      acquisition;
                          ``(iv) a description of--
                                    ``(I) the types and amount of 
                                restoration activities to be conducted;
                                    ``(II) the physical action to be 
                                undertaken to achieve the mitigation 
                                objectives within the watershed in which 
                                such losses occur and, in any case in 
                                which the mitigation will occur outside 
                                the watershed, a detailed explanation 
                                for undertaking the mitigation outside 
                                the watershed; and
                                    ``(III) the functions and values 
                                that will result from the mitigation 
                                plan; and
                          ``(v) a contingency plan for taking corrective 
                      actions in cases in which monitoring demonstrates 
                      that mitigation measures are not achieving 
                      ecological success in accordance with criteria 
                      under clause (ii).
                    ``(C) Responsibility for monitoring.--In any case in 
                which it is not practicable to identify in a mitigation 
                plan for a water resources project the entity 
                responsible for monitoring at the time of a final report 
                of the Chief of Engineers or other final decision 
                document for the project, such entity shall be 
                identified in the partnership agreement entered into 
                with the non-Federal interest under section 221 of Flood 
                Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b).
            ``(4) Determination of success.--
                    ``(A) In general.--A mitigation plan under this 
                subsection shall be considered to be successful at the 
                time at which the criteria under paragraph (3)(B)(ii) 
                are achieved under the plan, as determined by monitoring 
                under paragraph (3)(B)(i).
                    ``(B) Consultation.--In determining whether a 
                mitigation plan is successful under subparagraph (A), 
                the Secretary shall consult annually with appropriate 
                Federal agencies and each State in which the applicable 
                project is located on at least the following:
                          ``(i) The ecological success of the mitigation 
                      as of the date on which the report is submitted.
                          ``(ii) The likelihood that the mitigation will 
                      achieve ecological success, as defined in the 
                      mitigation plan.
                          ``(iii) The projected timeline for achieving 
                      that success.

[[Page 121 STAT. 1094]]

                          ``(iv) Any recommendations for improving the 
                      likelihood of success.
            ``(5) Monitoring.--Mitigation monitoring shall continue 
        until it has been demonstrated that the mitigation has met the 
        ecological success criteria.''.

    (b) <<NOTE: 33 USC 2283a.>> Status Report.--
            (1) In general.--Concurrent with the President's submission 
        to Congress of the President's request for appropriations for 
        the Civil Works Program for a fiscal year, the Secretary shall 
        submit to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of 
        the House of Representatives and the Committee on Environment 
        and Public Works of the Senate a report on the status of 
        construction of projects that require mitigation under section 
        906 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 
        2283), the status of such mitigation, and the results of the 
        consultation under subsection (d)(4)(B) of such section.
            (2) Projects included.--The status report shall include the 
        status of--
                    (A) all projects that are under construction as of 
                the date of the report;
                    (B) all projects for which the President requests 
                funding for the next fiscal year; and
                    (C) all projects that have undergone or completed 
                construction, but have not completed the mitigation 
                required under section 906 of the Water Resources 
                Development Act of 1986.
            (3) Availability of information.--The <<NOTE: Public 
        information. Internet.>> Secretary shall make information 
        contained in the status report available to the public, 
        including on the Internet.

    (c) <<NOTE: 33 USC 2317b.>> Wetlands Mitigation.--
            (1) In general.--In carrying out a water resources project 
        that involves wetlands mitigation and that has impacts that 
        occur within the service area of a mitigation bank, the 
        Secretary, where appropriate, shall first consider the use of 
        the mitigation bank if the bank contains sufficient available 
        credits to offset the impact and the bank is approved in 
        accordance with the Federal Guidance for the Establishment, Use 
        and Operation of Mitigation Banks (60 Fed. Reg. 58605) or other 
        applicable Federal law (including regulations).
            (2) Service area.--To the maximum extent practicable, the 
        service area of the mitigation bank under paragraph (1) shall be 
        in the same watershed as the affected habitat.
            (3) Responsibility for monitoring.--
                    (A) In general.--Purchase of credits from a 
                mitigation bank for a water resources project relieves 
                the Secretary and the non-Federal interest from 
                responsibility for monitoring or demonstrating 
                mitigation success.
                    (B) Applicability.--The relief of responsibility 
                under subparagraph (A) applies only in any case in which 
                the Secretary determines that monitoring of mitigation 
                success is being conducted by the Secretary or by the 
                owner or operator of the mitigation bank.
SEC. 2037. REGIONAL SEDIMENT MANAGEMENT.

    (a) In General.--Section 204 of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1992 (33 U.S.C. 2326) is amended to read as follows:

[[Page 121 STAT. 1095]]

``SEC. 204. REGIONAL SEDIMENT MANAGEMENT.

    ``(a) In General.--
            ``(1) Sediment use.--For sediment obtained through the 
        construction, operation, or maintenance of an authorized Federal 
        water resources project, the Secretary shall develop, at Federal 
        expense, regional sediment management plans and carry out 
        projects at locations identified in plans developed under this 
        section, or identified jointly by the non-Federal interest and 
        the Secretary, for use in the construction, repair, 
        modification, or rehabilitation of projects associated with 
        Federal water resources projects for purposes listed in 
        paragraph (3).
            ``(2) Cooperation.--The <<NOTE: Plans.>> Secretary shall 
        develop plans under this subsection in cooperation with the 
        appropriate Federal, State, regional, and local agencies.
            ``(3) Purposes for sediment use in projects.--The purposes 
        of using sediment for the construction, repair, modification, or 
        rehabilitation of Federal water resources projects are--
                    ``(A) to reduce storm damage to property;
                    ``(B) to protect, restore, and create aquatic and 
                ecologically related habitats, including wetlands; and
                    ``(C) to transport and place suitable sediment.

    ``(b) Secretarial Findings.--Subject to subsection (c), projects 
carried out under subsection (a) may be carried out in any case in which 
the Secretary finds that--
            ``(1) the environmental, economic, and social benefits of 
        the project, both monetary and nonmonetary, justify the cost of 
        the project; and
            ``(2) the project will not result in environmental 
        degradation.

    ``(c) Determination of Project Costs.--
            ``(1) Costs of construction.--
                    ``(A) In general.--Costs associated with 
                construction of a project under this section or 
                identified in a regional sediment management plan shall 
                be limited solely to construction costs that are in 
                excess of the costs necessary to carry out the dredging 
                for construction, operation, or maintenance of an 
                authorized Federal water resources project in the most 
                cost-effective way, consistent with economic, 
                engineering, and environmental criteria.
                    ``(B) Cost sharing.--
                          ``(i) In general.--Except as provided in 
                      clause (ii), the non-Federal share of the 
                      construction cost of a project under this section 
                      shall be determined as provided in subsections (a) 
                      through (d) of section 103 of the Water Resources 
                      Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2213).
                          ``(ii) Special rule.--Construction of a 
                      project under this section for one or more of the 
                      purposes of protection, restoration, or creation 
                      of aquatic and ecologically related habitat, the 
                      cost of which does not exceed $750,000 and which 
                      is located in a disadvantaged community as 
                      determined by the Secretary, may be carried out at 
                      Federal expense.
                    ``(C) Total cost.--The total Federal costs 
                associated with construction of a project under this 
                section may not exceed $5,000,000.

[[Page 121 STAT. 1096]]

            ``(2) Operation, maintenance, replacement, and 
        rehabilitation costs.--Operation, maintenance, replacement, and 
        rehabilitation costs associated with a project under this 
        section are the responsibility of the non-Federal interest.

    ``(d) Selection of Dredged Material Disposal Method for 
Environmental Purposes.--
            ``(1) In general.--In developing and carrying out a Federal 
        water resources project involving the disposal of dredged 
        material, the Secretary may select, with the consent of the non-
        Federal interest, a disposal method that is not the least cost 
        option if the Secretary determines that the incremental costs of 
        the disposal method are reasonable in relation to the 
        environmental benefits, including the benefits to the aquatic 
        environment to be derived from the creation of wetlands and 
        control of shoreline erosion.
            ``(2) Federal share.--The Federal share of such incremental 
        costs shall be determined in accordance with subsection (c).

    ``(e) State and Regional Plans.--The Secretary may--
            ``(1) cooperate with any State in the preparation of a 
        comprehensive State or regional sediment management plan within 
        the boundaries of the State;
            ``(2) encourage State participation in the implementation of 
        the plan; and
            ``(3) submit to Congress reports and recommendations with 
        respect to appropriate Federal participation in carrying out the 
        plan.

    ``(f) Priority Areas.--In carrying out this section, the Secretary 
shall give priority to a regional sediment management project in the 
vicinity of each of the following:
            ``(1) Little Rock Slackwater Harbor, Arkansas.
            ``(2) Fletcher Cove, California.
            ``(3) Egmont Key, Florida.
            ``(4) Calcasieu Ship Channel, Louisiana.
            ``(5) Delaware River Estuary, New Jersey and Pennsylvania.
            ``(6) Fire Island Inlet, Suffolk County, New York.
            ``(7) Smith Point Park Pavilion and the TWA Flight 800 
        Memorial, Brookhaven, New York.
            ``(8) Morehead City, North Carolina.
            ``(9) Toledo Harbor, Lucas County, Ohio.
            ``(10) Galveston Bay, Texas.
            ``(11) Benson Beach, Washington.

    ``(g) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $30,000,000 per fiscal year, of 
which not more than $5,000,000 per fiscal year may be used for the 
development of regional sediment management plans authorized by 
subsection (e) and of which not more than $3,000,000 per fiscal year may 
be used for construction of projects to which subsection (c)(1)(B)(ii) 
applies. Such funds shall remain available until expended.''.
    (b) Conforming Repeal.--
            (1) In general.--Section 145 of the Water Resources 
        Development Act of 1976 (33 U.S.C. 426j) is repealed.
            (2) Existing projects.--The <<NOTE: Termination date. 33 USC 
        426j note.>> Secretary may complete any project being carried 
        out under section 145 of the Water

[[Page 121 STAT. 1097]]

        Resources Development Act of 1976 on the day before the date of 
        enactment of this Act.
SEC. 2038. NATIONAL SHORELINE EROSION CONTROL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM.

    (a) In General.--Section 3 of the Act entitled ``An Act authorizing 
Federal participation in the cost of protecting the shores of publicly 
owned property'', approved August 13, 1946 (33 U.S.C. 426g), is amended 
to read as follows:
``SEC. 3. STORM AND HURRICANE RESTORATION AND IMPACT MINIMIZATION 
                    PROGRAM.

    ``(a) Construction of Small Shore and Beach Restoration and 
Protection Projects.--
            ``(1) In general.--The Secretary may carry out a program for 
        the construction of small shore and beach restoration and 
        protection projects not specifically authorized by Congress that 
        otherwise comply with the first section of this Act if the 
        Secretary determines that such construction is advisable.
            ``(2) <<NOTE: Applicability.>> Local cooperation.--The local 
        cooperation requirement of the first section of this Act shall 
        apply to a project under this section.
            ``(3) Completeness.--A project under this subsection--
                    ``(A) shall be complete; and
                    ``(B) shall not commit the United States to any 
                additional improvement to ensure the successful 
                operation of the project; except for participation in 
                periodic beach nourishment in accordance with--
                          ``(i) the first section of this Act; and
                          ``(ii) the procedure for projects authorized 
                      after submission of a survey report.

    ``(b) National Shoreline Erosion Control Development and 
Demonstration Program.--
            ``(1) In general.--The Secretary shall conduct under the 
        program authorized by subsection (a) a national shoreline 
        erosion control development and demonstration program (referred 
        to in this section as the `demonstration program').
            ``(2) Requirements.--
                    ``(A) In general.--The demonstration program shall 
                include provisions for--
                          ``(i) projects consisting of planning, design, 
                      construction, and monitoring of prototype 
                      engineered and native and naturalized vegetative 
                      shoreline erosion control devices and methods;
                          ``(ii) monitoring of the applicable 
                      prototypes;
                          ``(iii) detailed engineering and environmental 
                      reports on the results of each project carried out 
                      under the demonstraton program; and
                          ``(iv) technology transfers, as appropriate, 
                      to private property owners, State and local 
                      entities, nonprofit educational institutions, and 
                      nongovernmental organizations.
                    ``(B) Determination of feasibility.--A project under 
                the demonstration program shall not be carried out until 
                the Secretary determines that the project is feasible.
                    ``(C) Emphasis.--A project under the demonstration 
                program shall emphasize, to the maximum extent 
                practicable--

[[Page 121 STAT. 1098]]

                          ``(i) the development and demonstration of 
                      innovative technologies;
                          ``(ii) efficient designs to prevent erosion at 
                      a shoreline site, taking into account the 
                      lifecycle cost of the design, including cleanup, 
                      maintenance, and amortization;
                          ``(iii) new and enhanced shore protection 
                      project design and project formulation tools the 
                      purposes of which are to improve the physical 
                      performance, and lower the lifecycle costs, of the 
                      projects;
                          ``(iv) natural designs, including the use of 
                      native and naturalized vegetation or temporary 
                      structures that minimize permanent structural 
                      alterations to the shoreline;
                          ``(v) the avoidance of negative impacts to 
                      adjacent shorefront communities;
                          ``(vi) in areas with substantial residential 
                      or commercial interests located adjacent to the 
                      shoreline, designs that do not impair the 
                      aesthetic appeal of the interests;
                          ``(vii) the potential for long-term protection 
                      afforded by the technology; and
                          ``(viii) recommendations developed from 
                      evaluations of the program established under the 
                      Shoreline Erosion Control Demonstration Act of 
                      1974 (42 U.S.C. 1962-5 note), including--
                                    ``(I) adequate consideration of the 
                                subgrade;
                                    ``(II) proper filtration;
                                    ``(III) durable components;
                                    ``(IV) adequate connection between 
                                units; and
                                    ``(V) consideration of additional 
                                relevant information.
                    ``(D) Sites.--
                          ``(i) In general.--Each project under the 
                      demonstration program may be carried out at--
                                    ``(I) a privately owned site with 
                                substantial public access; or
                                    ``(II) a publicly owned site on open 
                                coast or in tidal waters.
                          ``(ii) Selection.--
                      The <<NOTE: Criteria.>> Secretary shall develop 
                      criteria for the selection of sites for projects 
                      under the demonstration program, including 
                      criteria based on--
                                    ``(I) a variety of geographic and 
                                climatic conditions;
                                    ``(II) the size of the population 
                                that is dependent on the beaches for 
                                recreation or the protection of private 
                                property or public infrastructure;
                                    ``(III) the rate of erosion;
                                    ``(IV) significant natural resources 
                                or habitats and environmentally 
                                sensitive areas; and
                                    ``(V) significant threatened 
                                historic structures or landmarks.
            ``(3) Consultation.--The Secretary shall carry out the 
        demonstration program in consultation with--

[[Page 121 STAT. 1099]]

                    ``(A) the Secretary of Agriculture, particularly 
                with respect to native and naturalized vegetative means 
                of preventing and controlling shoreline erosion;
                    ``(B) Federal, State, and local agencies;
                    ``(C) private organizations;
                    ``(D) the Coastal Engineering Research Center 
                established by the first section of Public Law 88-172 
                (33 U.S.C. 426-1); and
                    ``(E) applicable university research facilities.
            ``(4) Completion of demonstration.--After carrying out the 
        initial construction and evaluation of the performance and cost 
        of a project under the demonstration program, the Secretary 
        may--
                    ``(A) amend, at the request of a non-Federal 
                interest of the project, the partnership agreement for a 
                federally authorized shore protection project in 
                existence on the date on which initial construction of 
                the project under the demonstration program is complete 
                to incorporate the project constructed under the 
                demonstration program as a feature of the shore 
                protection project, with the future cost sharing of the 
                project constructed under the demonstration program to 
                be determined by the project purposes of the shore 
                protection project; or
                    ``(B) transfer all interest in and responsibility 
                for the completed project constructed under the 
                demonstration program to a non-Federal interest or 
                another Federal agency.
            ``(5) Agreements.--The Secretary may enter into a 
        partnership agreement with the non-Federal interest or a 
        cooperative agreement with the head of another Federal agency 
        under the demonstration program--
                    ``(A) to share the costs of construction, operation, 
                maintenance, and monitoring of a project under the 
                demonstration program;
                    ``(B) to share the costs of removing the project, or 
                element of the project if the Secretary determines that 
                the project or element of the project is detrimental to 
                public or private property, public infrastructure, or 
                public safety; or
                    ``(C) to specify ownership of the completed project 
                if the Secretary determines that the completed project 
                will not be part of a Corps of Engineers project.
            ``(6) Report.--Not later than December 31, 2008, and every 3 
        years thereafter, the Secretary shall prepare and submit to the 
        Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate and the 
        Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of 
        Representatives a report describing--
                    ``(A) the activities carried out and accomplishments 
                made under the demonstration program since the previous 
                report under this paragraph; and
                    ``(B) any recommendations of the Secretary relating 
                to the program.

    ``(c) Authorization of Appropriations.--
            ``(1) In general.--Subject to paragraph (2), the Secretary 
        may expend, from any appropriations made available to the 
        Secretary for the purpose of carrying out civil works, not more 
        than $30,000,000 during any fiscal year to pay the Federal share 
        of the costs of construction of small shore and beach

[[Page 121 STAT. 1100]]

        restoration and protection projects or small projects under this 
        section.
            ``(2) Limitation.--The total amount expended for a project 
        under this section shall--
                    ``(A) be sufficient to pay the cost of Federal 
                participation in the project (including periodic 
                nourishment as provided for under the first section of 
                this Act), as determined by the Secretary; and
                    ``(B) be not more than $5,000,000.''.

    (b) Repeal.--Section 5 the Act entitled ``An Act authorizing Federal 
participation in the cost of protecting the shores of publicly owned 
property'', approved August 13, 1946 (33 U.S.C. 426h), is repealed.
SEC. 2039. <<NOTE: 33 USC 2330a.>> MONITORING ECOSYSTEM 
                          RESTORATION.

    (a) In General.--In conducting a feasibility study for a project (or 
a component of a project) for ecosystem restoration, the Secretary shall 
ensure that the recommended project includes, as an integral part of the 
project, a plan for monitoring the success of the ecosystem restoration.
    (b) Monitoring Plan.--The monitoring plan shall--
            (1) include a description of the monitoring activities to be 
        carried out, the criteria for ecosystem restoration success, and 
        the estimated cost and duration of the monitoring; and
            (2) specify that the monitoring shall continue until such 
        time as the Secretary determines that the criteria for ecosystem 
        restoration success will be met.

    (c) Cost Share.--For a period of 10 years from completion of 
construction of a project (or a component of a project) for ecosystem 
restoration, the Secretary shall consider the cost of carrying out the 
monitoring as a project cost. If the monitoring plan under subsection 
(b) requires monitoring beyond the 10-year period, the cost of 
monitoring shall be a non-Federal responsibility.
SEC. 2040. <<NOTE: 33 USC 2345.>> ELECTRONIC SUBMISSION OF PERMIT 
                          APPLICATIONS.

    (a) In General.--Not <<NOTE: Deadline.>> later than 2 years after 
the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall implement a 
program to allow electronic submission of permit applications for 
permits under the jurisdiction of the Secretary.

    (b) Limitations.--This section does not preclude the submission of a 
physical copy.
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $3,000,000.
SEC. 2041. <<NOTE: 33 USC 2346.>> PROJECT ADMINISTRATION.

    (a) Project Tracking.--The Secretary shall assign a unique tracking 
number to each water resources project under the jurisdiction of the 
Secretary to be used by each Federal agency throughout the life of the 
project.
    (b) Report Repository.--
            (1) <<NOTE: Records.>> In general.--The Secretary shall 
        provide to the Library of Congress a copy of each final 
        feasibility study, final environmental impact statement, final 
        reevaluation report, record of decision, and report to Congress 
        prepared by the Corps of Engineers.
            (2) Availability to public.--Each <<NOTE: Public 
        information. Internet.>> document described in paragraph (1) 
        shall be made available to the public, and an

[[Page 121 STAT. 1101]]

        electronic copy of each document shall be made permanently 
        available to the public through the Internet.
SEC. 2042. PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION.

    Sections 101, 106, and 108 of the Energy and Water Development 
Appropriations Act, 2006 (Public Law 109-103; 119 Stat. 2252-2254), are 
repealed.
SEC. 2043. STUDIES AND REPORTS FOR WATER RESOURCES PROJECTS.

    (a) Studies.--
            (1) Cost-sharing requirements.--Section 105(a) of the Water 
        Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2215(a)) is amended 
        by adding at the end the following:
            ``(3) <<NOTE: Applicability.>> Detailed project reports.--
        The requirements of this subsection that apply to a feasibility 
        study also shall apply to a study that results in a detailed 
        project report, except that--
                    ``(A) the first $100,000 of the costs of a study 
                that results in a detailed project report shall be a 
                Federal expense; and
                    ``(B) paragraph (1)(C)(ii) shall not apply to such a 
                study.''.
            (2) Planning and engineering.--Section 105(b) of such Act 
        (33 U.S.C. 2215(b)) is amended by striking ``authorized by this 
        Act''.
            (3) Definitions.--Section 105 of such Act (33 U.S.C. 2215) 
        is amended by adding at the end the following:

    ``(d) Definitions.--In this section, the following definitions 
apply:
            ``(1) Detailed project report.--The term `detailed project 
        report' means a report for a project not specifically authorized 
        by Congress in law or otherwise that determines the feasibility 
        of the project with a level of detail appropriate to the scope 
        and complexity of the recommended solution and sufficient to 
        proceed directly to the preparation of contract plans and 
        specifications. The term includes any associated environmental 
        impact statement and mitigation plan. For a project for which 
        the Federal cost does not exceed $1,000,000, the term includes a 
        planning and design analysis document.
            ``(2) Feasibility study.--The term `feasibility study' means 
        a study that results in a feasibility report under section 905, 
        and any associated environmental impact statement and mitigation 
        plan, prepared by the Corps of Engineers for a water resources 
        project. The term includes a study that results in a project 
        implementation report prepared under title VI of the Water 
        Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2680-2694), a 
        general reevaluation report, and a limited reevaluation 
        report.''.

    (b) Reports.--
            (1) Preparation.--Section 905(a) of the Water Resources 
        Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2282(a)) is amended--
                    (A) by striking ``(a) In the case of any'' and 
                inserting the following:

    ``(a) Preparation of Reports.--
            ``(1) In general.--In the case of any'';
                    (B) by striking ``the Secretary, the Secretary 
                shall'' and inserting ``the Secretary that results in 
                recommendations concerning a project or the operation of 
                a project

[[Page 121 STAT. 1102]]

                and that requires specific authorization by Congress in 
                law or otherwise, the Secretary shall perform a 
                reconnaissance study and'';
                    (C) by striking ``Such feasibility report'' and 
                inserting the following:
            ``(2) Contents of feasibility reports.--A feasibility 
        report'';
                    (D) by striking ``The feasibility report'' and 
                inserting ``A feasibility report''; and
                    (E) by striking the last sentence and inserting the 
                following:
            ``(3) Applicability.--This subsection shall not apply to--
                    ``(A) any study with respect to which a report has 
                been submitted to Congress before the date of enactment 
                of this Act;
                    ``(B) any study for a project, which project is 
                authorized for construction by this Act and is not 
                subject to section 903(b);
                    ``(C) any study for a project which does not require 
                specific authorization by Congress in law or otherwise; 
                and
                    ``(D) general studies not intended to lead to 
                recommendation of a specific water resources project.
            ``(4) Feasibility report defined.--In this subsection, the 
        term `feasibility report' means each feasibility report, and any 
        associated environmental impact statement and mitigation plan, 
        prepared by the Corps of Engineers for a water resources 
        project. The term includes a project implementation report 
        prepared under title VI of the Water Resources Development Act 
        of 2000 (114 Stat. 2680-2694), a general reevaluation report, 
        and a limited reevaluation report.''.
            (2) Projects not specifically authorized by congress.--
        Section 905 of such Act is further amended--
                    (A) in subsection (b) by inserting ``Reconnaissance 
                Studies.--'' before ``Before initiating'';
                    (B) by redesignating subsections (c), (d), and (e) 
                as subsections (d), (e), and (f), respectively;
                    (C) by inserting after subsection (b) the following:

    ``(c) Projects Not Specifically Authorized by Congress.--In the case 
of any water resources project-related study authorized to be undertaken 
by the Secretary without specific authorization by Congress in law or 
otherwise, the Secretary shall prepare a detailed project report.'';
                    (D) in subsection (d) (as so redesignated) by 
                inserting ``Indian Tribes.--'' before ``For purposes 
                of''; and
                    (E) in subsection (e) (as so redesignated) by 
                inserting ``Standard and Uniform Procedures and 
                Practices.--'' before ``The Secretary shall''.
SEC. 2044. <<NOTE: 33 USC 2347.>> COORDINATION AND SCHEDULING OF 
                          FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCAL ACTIONS.

    (a) <<NOTE: Procedures.>> Notice of Intent.--Upon request of the 
non-Federal interest in the form of a written notice of intent to 
construct or modify a non-Federal water supply, wastewater 
infrastructure,

[[Page 121 STAT. 1103]]

flood damage reduction, storm damage reduction, ecosystem restoration, 
or navigation project that requires the approval of the Secretary, the 
Secretary shall initiate, subject to subsection (c), procedures to 
establish a schedule for consolidating Federal, State, and local agency 
and Indian tribe environmental assessments, project reviews, and 
issuance of all permits for the construction or modification of the 
project. All States and Indian tribes having jurisdiction over the 
proposed project shall be invited by the Secretary, but shall not be 
required, to participate in carrying out this section with respect to 
the project.

    (b) Coordination.--The Secretary shall seek, to the extent 
practicable, to consolidate hearing and comment periods, procedures for 
data collection and report preparation, and the environmental review and 
permitting processes associated with the project and related 
activities. <<NOTE: Notification.>> The Secretary shall notify, to the 
extent possible, the non-Federal interest of its responsibilities for 
data development and information that may be necessary to process each 
permit required for the project, including a schedule when the 
information and data should be provided to the appropriate Federal, 
State, or local agency or Indian tribe.

    (c) Costs of Coordination.--The costs incurred by the Secretary to 
establish and carry out a schedule to consolidate Federal, State, and 
local agency and Indian tribe environmental assessments, project 
reviews, and permit issuance for a project under this section shall be 
paid by the non-Federal interest.
    (d) Report on Timesavings Methods.--Not later than 3 years after the 
date of enactment of this section, the Secretary shall prepare and 
transmit to Congress a report estimating the time required for the 
issuance of all Federal, State, local, and tribal permits for the 
construction of non-Federal projects for water supply, wastewater 
infrastructure, flood damage reduction, storm damage reduction, 
ecosystem restoration, and navigation.
SEC. 2045. <<NOTE: 33 USC 2348.>> PROJECT STREAMLINING.

    (a) Policy.--The benefits of water resources projects are important 
to the Nation's economy and environment, and recommendations to Congress 
regarding such projects should not be delayed due to uncoordinated or 
inefficient reviews or the failure to timely resolve disputes during the 
development of water resources projects.
    (b) <<NOTE: Applicability.>> Scope.--This section shall apply to 
each study initiated after the date of enactment of this Act to develop 
a feasibility report under section 905 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2282), or a reevaluation report, for 
a water resources project if the Secretary determines that such study 
requires an environmental impact statement under the National 
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.).

    (c) Water Resources Project Review Process.--The Secretary shall 
develop and implement a coordinated review process for the development 
of water resources projects.
    (d) Coordinated Reviews.--The coordinated review process under this 
section may provide that all reviews, analyses, opinions, permits, 
licenses, and approvals that must be issued or made by a Federal, State, 
or local government agency or Indian tribe for the development of a 
water resources project described in subsection

[[Page 121 STAT. 1104]]

(b) will be conducted, to the maximum extent practicable, concurrently 
and completed within a time period established by the Secretary in 
cooperation with the agencies identified under subsection (e) with 
respect to the project.
    (e) Identification of Jurisdictional Agencies.--With respect to the 
development of each water resources project, the Secretary shall 
identify, as soon as practicable, all Federal, State, and local 
government agencies and Indian tribes that may--
            (1) have jurisdiction over the project;
            (2) be required by law to conduct or issue a review, 
        analysis, or opinion for the project; or
            (3) be required to make a determination on issuing a permit, 
        license, or approval for the project.

    (f) State Authority.--If the coordinated review process is being 
implemented under this section by the Secretary with respect to the 
development of a water resources project described in subsection (b) 
within the boundaries of a State, the State, consistent with State law, 
may choose to participate in the process and to make subject to the 
process all State agencies that--
            (1) have jurisdiction over the project;
            (2) are required to conduct or issue a review, analysis, or 
        opinion for the project; or
            (3) are required to make a determination on issuing a 
        permit, license, or approval for the project.

    (g) Memorandum of Understanding.--The coordinated review process 
developed under this section may be incorporated into a memorandum of 
understanding for a water resources project between the Secretary, the 
heads of Federal, State, and local government agencies, Indian tribes 
identified under subsection (e), and the non-Federal interest for the 
project.
    (h) Effect of Failure to Meet Deadline.--
            (1) Notification.--If the Secretary determines that a 
        Federal, State, or local government agency, Indian tribe, or 
        non-Federal interest that is participating in the coordinated 
        review process under this section with respect to the 
        development of a water resources project has not met a deadline 
        established under subsection (d) for the project, the Secretary 
        shall notify, within 30 days of the date of such determination, 
        the agency, Indian tribe, or non-Federal interest about the 
        failure to meet the deadline.
            (2) Agency report.--Not later than 30 days after the date of 
        receipt of a notice under paragraph (1), the Federal, State, or 
        local government agency, Indian tribe, or non-Federal interest 
        involved may submit a report to the Secretary, explaining why 
        the agency, Indian tribe, or non-Federal interest did not meet 
        the deadline and what actions it intends to take to complete or 
        issue the required review, analysis, or opinion or determination 
        on issuing a permit, license, or approval.
            (3) Report to congress.--Not later than 30 days after the 
        date of receipt of a report under paragraph (2), the Secretary 
        shall compile and submit a report to the Committee on 
        Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of 
        Representatives, the Committee on Environment and Public Works 
        of the Senate, and the Council on Environmental Quality, 
        describing any deadlines identified in paragraph (1), and any 
        information provided to the Secretary by the Federal, State,

[[Page 121 STAT. 1105]]

        or local government agency, Indian tribe, or non-Federal 
        interest involved under paragraph (2).

    (i) Limitations.--Nothing in this section shall preempt or interfere 
with--
            (1) any statutory requirement for seeking public comment;
            (2) any power, jurisdiction, or authority that a Federal, 
        State, or local government agency, Indian tribe, or non-Federal 
        interest has with respect to carrying out a water resources 
        project; or
            (3) any obligation to comply with the provisions of the 
        National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 and the regulations 
        issued by the Council on Environmental Quality to carry out such 
        Act.
SEC. 2046. PROJECT DEAUTHORIZATION.

    Section 1001(b)(2) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 
(33 U.S.C. 579a(b)(2)) is amended--
            (1) in the first sentence--
                    (A) by striking ``two years'' and inserting 
                ``year''; and
                    (B) by striking ``7'' and inserting ``5'';
            (2) in the last sentence by striking ``30 months after the 
        date'' and inserting ``the last date of the fiscal year 
        following the fiscal year in which''; and
            (3) in the last sentence by striking ``such 30 month 
        period'' and inserting ``such period''.
SEC. 2047. FEDERAL HOPPER DREDGES.

    (a) Hopper Dredge Mcfarland.--Section 563 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3784) is amended to read as follows:
``SEC. 563. HOPPER DREDGE MCFARLAND.

    ``(a) Placement in Ready Reserve Status.--Not <<NOTE: Effective 
date. Termination date.>> before October 1, 2009, and not after December 
31, 2009, the Secretary shall--
            ``(1) place the Federal hopper dredge McFarland (referred to 
        in this section as the `vessel') in a ready reserve status; and
            ``(2) use the vessel solely for urgent and emergency 
        purposes in accordance with existing emergency response 
        protocols.

    ``(b) Routine Tests and Maintenance.--
            ``(1) In general.--The Secretary shall periodically perform 
        routine underway dredging tests of the equipment (not to exceed 
        70 days per year) of the vessel in a ready reserve status to 
        ensure the ability of the vessel to perform urgent and emergency 
        work.
            ``(2) Maintenance.--The Secretary--
                    ``(A) shall not assign any scheduled hopper dredging 
                work to the vessel other than dredging tests in the 
                Delaware River and Bay; but
                    ``(B) shall perform any repairs, including any 
                asbestos abatement, necessary to maintain the vessel in 
                a ready reserve fully operational condition.

    ``(c) Active Status for Dredging.--The Secretary, in consultation 
with affected stakeholders, shall place the vessel in active status in 
order to perform dredging work if the Secretary determines that private 
industry has failed--

[[Page 121 STAT. 1106]]

            ``(1) to submit a responsive and responsible bid for work 
        advertised by the Secretary; or
            ``(2) to carry out a project as required pursuant to a 
        contract between the industry and the Secretary.''.

    (b) Hopper Dredges Essayons and Yaquina.--Section 3(c)(7)(B) of the 
Act of August 11, 1888 (33 U.S.C. 622; 25 Stat. 423), is amended by 
adding at the end the following: ``This subparagraph shall not apply to 
the Federal hopper dredges Essayons and Yaquina of the Corps of 
Engineers.''.

                  TITLE III--PROJECT-RELATED PROVISIONS

SEC. 3001. BLACK WARRIOR-TOMBIGBEE RIVERS, ALABAMA.

    Section 111 of title I of division C of the Consolidated 
Appropriations Act, 2005 (118 Stat. 2944) is amended to read as follows:
``SEC. 111. BLACK WARRIOR-TOMBIGBEE RIVERS, ALABAMA.

    ``(a) Construction of New Facilities.--
            ``(1) Definitions.--In this subsection, the following 
        definitions apply:
                    ``(A) Existing facility.--The term `existing 
                facility' means the administrative and maintenance 
                facility for the project for Black Warrior-Tombigbee 
                Rivers, Alabama, authorized by the first section of the 
                River and Harbor Appropriations Act of July 5, 1884 (24 
                Stat. 141), in existence on the date of enactment of the 
                Water Resources Development Act of 2007.
                    ``(B) Parcel.--The term `Parcel' means the land 
                owned by the Corps of Engineers serving as the 
                operations and maintenance facility of the Corps of 
                Engineers in the city of Tuscaloosa, Alabama, in 
                existence on the date of enactment of the Water 
                Resources Development Act of 2007.
            ``(2) Authorization.--In carrying out the project for Black 
        Warrior-Tombigbee Rivers, Alabama, the Secretary is authorized, 
        at Federal expense--
                    ``(A) to purchase land on which the Secretary may 
                construct a new maintenance facility for the project, to 
                be located--
                          ``(i) at a different location from the 
                      existing facility; and
                          ``(ii) in the vicinity of the city of 
                      Tuscaloosa, Alabama;
                    ``(B) at any time during or after the completion of 
                (and relocation to) the new maintenance facility, to 
                demolish the existing facility; and
                    ``(C) to construct on the Parcel a new 
                administrative facility for the project.

    ``(b) Acquisition and Disposition of Property.--The Secretary--
            ``(1) may acquire any real property necessary for the 
        construction of the new maintenance facility under subsection 
        (a)(2)(A); and
            ``(2) shall convey to the city of Tuscaloosa fee simple 
        title in and to any portion of the Parcel not required for 
        construction

[[Page 121 STAT. 1107]]

        of the new administrative facility under subsection (a)(2)(C) 
        through--
                    ``(A) sale at fair market value;
                    ``(B) exchange for city of Tuscaloosa owned land on 
                an acre-for-acre basis; or
                    ``(C) any combination of a sale under subparagraph 
                (A) and an exchange under subparagraph (B).

    ``(c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $32,000,000.''.
SEC. 3002. COOK INLET, ALASKA.

    Section 118(a)(3) of the Energy and Water Development Appropriations 
Act, 2005 (title I of division C of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 
2005; 118 Stat. 2945) is amended by inserting ``as part of the operation 
and maintenance of such project modification'' after ``by the 
Secretary''.
SEC. 3003. KING COVE HARBOR, ALASKA.

    The maximum amount of Federal funds that may be expended for the 
project for navigation, King Cove Harbor, Alaska, being carried out 
under section 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 577), 
shall be $8,000,000.
SEC. 3004. SEWARD HARBOR, ALASKA.

    The project for navigation, Seward Harbor, Alaska, authorized by 
section 101(a)(3) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 
Stat. 274), is modified to authorize the Secretary to extend the 
existing breakwater by approximately 215 feet, at a total cost of 
$3,333,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $2,666,000 and an 
estimated non-Federal cost of $667,000.
SEC. 3005. SITKA, ALASKA.

    The Sitka, Alaska, element of the project for navigation, Southeast 
Alaska Harbors of Refuge, Alaska, authorized by section 101(1) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4801), is modified to 
direct the Secretary to take such action as is necessary to correct 
design deficiencies in the Sitka Harbor Breakwater at Federal expense. 
The estimated cost is $6,300,000.
SEC. 3006. TATITLEK, ALASKA.

    The maximum amount of Federal funds that may be expended for the 
project for navigation, Tatitlek, Alaska, being carried out under 
section 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 577), shall 
be $10,000,000.
SEC. 3007. RIO DE FLAG, FLAGSTAFF, ARIZONA.

    The project for flood damage reduction, Rio De Flag, Flagstaff, 
Arizona, authorized by section 101(b)(3) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2576), is modified to authorize the 
Secretary to construct the project at a total cost of $54,100,000, with 
an estimated Federal cost of $35,000,000 and a non-Federal cost of 
$19,100,000.
SEC. 3008. NOGALES WASH AND TRIBUTARIES FLOOD CONTROL PROJECT, 
                          ARIZONA.

    The project for flood control, Nogales Wash and tributaries, 
Arizona, authorized by section 101(a)(4) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1990 (104 Stat. 4606) and modified by section 303 of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat.

[[Page 121 STAT. 1108]]

3711) and section 302 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 
(114 Stat. 2600), is modified to authorize the Secretary to construct 
the project at a total cost of $25,410,000, with an estimated Federal 
cost of $22,930,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $2,480,000.
SEC. 3009. TUCSON DRAINAGE AREA, ARIZONA.

    The project for flood damage reduction, environmental restoration, 
and recreation, Tucson drainage area, Arizona, authorized by section 
101(a)(5) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 
274), is modified to authorize the Secretary to construct the project at 
a total cost of $66,700,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
$43,350,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $23,350,000.
SEC. 3010. OSCEOLA HARBOR, ARKANSAS.

    (a) In General.--The project for navigation, Osceola Harbor, 
Arkansas, constructed under section 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 
1960 (33 U.S.C. 577), is modified to allow non-Federal interests to 
construct a mooring facility within the existing authorized harbor 
channel, subject to all necessary permits, certifications, and other 
requirements.
    (b) Limitation on Statutory Construction.--Nothing in this section 
shall be construed as affecting the responsibility of the Secretary to 
maintain the general navigation features of the project at a bottom 
width of 250 feet.
SEC. 3011. ST. FRANCIS RIVER BASIN, ARKANSAS AND MISSOURI.

    The project for flood control, St. Francis River Basin, Arkansas and 
Missouri, authorized by the Act of June 15, 1936 (49 Stat. 1508), is 
modified to authorize the Secretary to undertake channel stabilization 
and sediment removal measures on the St. Francis River and tributaries 
as a nonseparable element of the original project.
SEC. 3012. PINE MOUNTAIN DAM, ARKANSAS.

    The Pine Mountain Dam feature of the project for flood protection, 
Lee Creek, Arkansas and Oklahoma, authorized by section 204 of the Flood 
Control Act of 1965 (79 Stat. 1078), is modified--
            (1) to add environmental restoration as a project purpose; 
        and
            (2) to direct the Secretary to finance the non-Federal share 
        of the cost of the project, including treatment and 
        distributions components, over a 30-year period in accordance 
        with section 103(k) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
        1986 (33 U.S.C. 2213(k)).
SEC. 3013. RED-OUACHITA RIVER BASIN LEVEES, ARKANSAS AND 
                          LOUISIANA.

    (a) In General.--Section 204 of the Flood Control Act of 1950 (64 
Stat. 173) is amended in the matter under the heading ``red-ouachita 
river basin'' by striking ``improvements at Calion, Arkansas'' and 
inserting ``improvements at Calion, Arkansas (including authorization 
for the comprehensive flood-control project for Ouachita River and 
tributaries, incorporating in the project all flood control, drainage, 
and power improvements in the basin above the lower end of the left bank 
Ouachita River levee)''.

[[Page 121 STAT. 1109]]

    (b) Modification.--Section <<NOTE: 33 USC 702a-12.>> 3 of the Flood 
Control Act of August 18, 1941 (55 Stat. 642), is amended in the second 
sentence of subsection (a) in the matter under the heading ``lower 
mississippi river'' by inserting before the period at the end the 
following: ``; except that the Ouachita River Levees, Louisiana, 
authorized by the first section of the Mississippi River Flood Control 
Act of May 15, 1928 (45 Stat. 534), shall remain as a component of the 
Mississippi River and Tributaries Project and afforded operation and 
maintenance responsibilities as provided under section 3 of that Act (45 
Stat. 535)''.
SEC. 3014. CACHE CREEK BASIN, CALIFORNIA.

    (a) In General.--The project for flood control, Cache Creek Basin, 
California, authorized by section 401(a) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4112), is modified to direct the 
Secretary to mitigate the impacts of the new south levee of the Cache 
Creek settling basin on the storm drainage system of the city of 
Woodland, including all appurtenant features, erosion control measures, 
and environmental protection features.
    (b) Objectives.--Mitigation under subsection (a) shall restore the 
preproject capacity of the city of Woodland to release 1,360 cubic feet 
per second of water to the Yolo Bypass and shall include--
            (1) channel improvements;
            (2) an outlet work through the west levee of the Yolo 
        Bypass; and
            (3) a new low flow cross channel to handle city and county 
        storm drainage and settling basin flows (1,760 cubic feet per 
        second) when the Yolo Bypass is in a low flow condition.
SEC. 3015. CALFED STABILITY PROGRAM, CALIFORNIA.

    (a) Amendments.--Section 103(f)(3) of the Water Supply, Reliability, 
and Environmental Improvement Act (118 Stat. 1695-1696) is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (A) by striking ``within the Delta (as 
        defined in Cal. Water Code Sec. 12220)'';
            (2) by striking subparagraph (C) and inserting the 
        following:
                    ``(C) Justification.--
                          ``(i) In general.--Notwithstanding section 209 
                      of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962-
                      2), in carrying out levee stability programs and 
                      projects pursuant to this paragraph, the Secretary 
                      of the Army may determine that the programs and 
                      projects are justified by the benefits of the 
                      project purposes described in subparagraph (A), 
                      and the programs and projects shall require no 
                      additional economic justification if the Secretary 
                      of the Army further determines that the programs 
                      and projects are cost effective.
                          ``(ii) Applicability.--Clause (i) shall not 
                      apply to any separable element intended to produce 
                      benefits that are predominantly unrelated to the 
                      project purposes described in subparagraph (A).''; 
                      and
            (3) in subparagraph (D)(i) by inserting ``as described in 
        the Record of Decision'' after ``Public Law 84-99 standard)''.

    (b) Additional Authorization of Appropriations.--In addition to 
funds made available pursuant to the Water Supply, Reliability, and 
Environmental Improvement Act (Public Law 108-361) to carry out section 
103(f)(3)(D) of that Act (118 Stat. 1696),

[[Page 121 STAT. 1110]]

there is authorized to be appropriated to carry out projects described 
in that section $106,000,000, to remain available until expended.
SEC. 3016. COMPTON CREEK, CALIFORNIA.

    The project for flood control, Los Angeles Drainage Area, 
California, authorized by section 101(b) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1990 (104 Stat. 4611), is modified to add 
environmental restoration and recreation as project purposes.
SEC. 3017. GRAYSON CREEK/MURDERER'S CREEK, CALIFORNIA.

    The project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Grayson Creek/
Murderer's Creek, California, being carried out under section 206 of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 2330), is modified--
            (1) to direct the Secretary to credit, in accordance with 
        section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-
        5b), toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the project the 
        cost of work carried out by the non-Federal interest for the 
        project before the date of the partnership agreement for the 
        project; and
            (2) to authorize the Secretary to consider national 
        ecosystem restoration benefits in determining the Federal 
        interest in the project.
SEC. 3018. HAMILTON AIRFIELD, CALIFORNIA.

    The project for environmental restoration, Hamilton Airfield, 
California, authorized by section 101(b)(3) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 279), is modified to direct the 
Secretary to construct the project substantially in accordance with the 
report of the Chief of Engineers dated July 19, 2004, at a total cost of 
$228,100,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $171,100,000 and an 
estimated non-Federal cost of $57,000,000.
SEC. 3019. JOHN F. BALDWIN SHIP CHANNEL AND STOCKTON SHIP CHANNEL, 
                          CALIFORNIA.

    The project for navigation, San Francisco to Stockton, California, 
authorized by section 301 of the River and Harbor Act of 1965 (79 Stat. 
1091) is modified--
            (1) to provide that the non-Federal share of the cost of the 
        John F. Baldwin Ship Channel and Stockton Ship Channel element 
        of the project may be provided in the form of in-kind services 
        and materials; and
            (2) to direct the Secretary to credit, in accordance with 
        section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-
        5b), toward the non-Federal share of the cost of such element 
        the cost of planning and design work carried out by the non-
        Federal interest for such element before the date of an 
        agreement for such planning and design.
SEC. 3020. KAWEAH RIVER, CALIFORNIA.

    The project for flood control, Terminus Dam, Kaweah River, 
California, authorized by section 101(b)(5) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3658), is modified to direct the 
Secretary to credit, in accordance with section 221 of the Flood Control 
Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), toward the non-Federal share of the 
cost of the project, or provide reimbursement not to exceed $800,000, 
for the costs of any work carried out by the

[[Page 121 STAT. 1111]]

non-Federal interest for the project before the date of the project 
partnership agreement.
SEC. 3021. LARKSPUR FERRY CHANNEL, LARKSPUR, CALIFORNIA.

    The project for navigation, Larkspur Ferry Channel, Larkspur, 
California, authorized by section 601(d) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4148), is modified to direct the 
Secretary to determine whether maintenance of the project is feasible, 
and if the Secretary determines that maintenance of the project is 
feasible, to carry out such maintenance.
SEC. 3022. LLAGAS CREEK, CALIFORNIA.

    (a) In General.--The project for flood damage reduction, Llagas 
Creek, California, authorized by section 501(a) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 333), is modified to direct the 
Secretary to carry out the project at a total cost of $105,000,000, with 
an estimated Federal cost of $65,000,000 and an estimated non-Federal 
cost of $40,000,000.
    (b) Special Rule.--In evaluating and implementing the project, the 
Secretary shall allow the non-Federal interest to participate in the 
financing of the project in accordance with section 903(c) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4184) if the detailed 
project report evaluation indicates that applying such section is 
necessary to implement the project.
SEC. 3023. MAGPIE CREEK, CALIFORNIA.

    (a) In General.--The <<NOTE: Applicability.>> project for Magpie 
Creek, California, authorized under section 205 of the Flood Control Act 
of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s), is modified to direct the Secretary to apply 
the cost-sharing requirements of section 103(b) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4085) for the portion of the project 
consisting of land acquisition to preserve and enhance existing 
floodwater storage.

    (b) Credit.--The Secretary shall credit, in accordance with section 
221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), toward the 
non-Federal share of the cost of the project the cost of planning and 
design work carried out by the non-Federal interest for the project 
before the date of the partnership agreement for the project.
    (c) Cost.--The maximum amount of Federal funds that may be expended 
for the project referred to in subsection (a) shall be $10,000,000.
SEC. 3024. PACIFIC FLYWAY CENTER, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA.

    The project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Pacific Flyway 
Center, Sacramento, California, being carried out under section 206 of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 2330), is 
modified to authorize the Secretary to expend $2,000,000 to enhance 
public access to the project.
SEC. 3025. PETALUMA RIVER, PETALUMA, CALIFORNIA.

    The project for flood damage reduction, Petaluma River, Petaluma, 
California, authorized by section 112 of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2587), is modified to authorize the Secretary to 
construct the project at a total cost of $41,500,000, with an estimated 
Federal cost of $26,975,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
$14,525,000.

[[Page 121 STAT. 1112]]

SEC. 3026. PINOLE CREEK, CALIFORNIA.

    The project for improvement of the quality of the environment, 
Pinole Creek Phase I, California, being carried out under section 1135 
of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2309a), is 
modified to direct the Secretary to credit, in accordance with section 
221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), toward the 
non-Federal share of the cost of the project the cost of work carried 
out by the non-Federal interest for the project before the date of the 
partnership agreement for the project.
SEC. 3027. PRADO DAM, CALIFORNIA.

    Upon completion of the modifications to the Prado Dam element of the 
project for flood control, Santa Ana River Mainstem, California, 
authorized by section 401(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1986 (100 Stat. 4113), the Memorandum of Agreement for the Operation for 
Prado Dam for Seasonal Additional Water Conservation between the 
Department of the Army and the Orange County Water District (including 
all the conditions and stipulations in the memorandum) shall remain in 
effect for volumes of water made available prior to such modifications.
SEC. 3028. REDWOOD CITY NAVIGATION CHANNEL, CALIFORNIA.

    The Secretary may dredge the Redwood City Navigation Channel, 
California, on an annual basis, to maintain the authorized depth of -30 
feet mean lower low water.
SEC. 3029. SACRAMENTO AND AMERICAN RIVERS FLOOD CONTROL, 
                          CALIFORNIA.

    (a) Natomas Levee Features.--
            (1) In general.--The project for flood control and 
        recreation, Sacramento and American Rivers, California (Natomas 
        Levee features), authorized by section 9159 of the Department of 
        Defense Appropriations Act, 1993 (106 Stat. 1944), is modified 
        to direct the Secretary to credit $20,503,000 to the Sacramento 
        Area Flood Control Agency for the nonreimbursed Federal share of 
        costs incurred by the Agency in connection with the project.
            (2) Allocation of credit.--The Secretary shall allocate the 
        amount to be credited pursuant to paragraph (1) toward the non-
        Federal share of such projects as are requested by the 
        Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency.

    (b) Joint Federal Project at Folsom Dam.--
            (1) In general.--The project for flood control, American and 
        Sacramento Rivers, California, authorized by section 
        101(a)(6)(A) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 
        Stat. 274) and modified by section 128 of the Energy and Water 
        Development Appropriations Act, 2006 (119 Stat. 2259), is 
        modified to authorize the Secretary to construct the auxiliary 
        spillway generally in accordance with the Post Authorization 
        Change Report, American River Watershed Project (Folsom Dam 
        Modification and Folsom Dam Raise Projects), dated March 2007, 
        at a total cost of $683,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost 
        of $444,000,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
        $239,000,000.
            (2) Dam safety.--Nothing in this subsection limits the 
        authority of the Secretary of the Interior to carry out dam 
        safety activities in connection with the auxiliary spillway in

[[Page 121 STAT. 1113]]

        accordance with the Bureau of Reclamation safety of dams 
        program.
            (3) Transfer of funds.--
                    (A) In general.--The Secretary and the Secretary of 
                the Interior are authorized to transfer between the 
                Department of the Army and the Department of the 
                Interior appropriated amounts and other available funds 
                (including funds contributed by non-Federal interests) 
                for the purpose of planning, design, and construction of 
                the auxiliary spillway.
                    (B) Terms and conditions.--Any transfer made 
                pursuant to this subsection shall be subject to such 
                terms and conditions as may be agreed on by the 
                Secretary and the Secretary of the Interior.
SEC. 3030. SACRAMENTO DEEP WATER SHIP CHANNEL, CALIFORNIA.

    The project for navigation, Sacramento Deep Water Ship Channel, 
California, authorized by section 202(a) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4092), is modified to direct the 
Secretary to credit, in accordance with section 221 of the Flood Control 
Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), toward the non-Federal share of the 
cost of the project the cost of planning and design work carried out by 
the non-Federal interest for the project before the date of the 
partnership agreement for the project.
SEC. 3031. SACRAMENTO RIVER BANK PROTECTION, CALIFORNIA.

    Section 202 of the River Basin Monetary Authorization Act of 1974 
(88 Stat. 49) is amended by striking ``and the monetary authorization'' 
and all that follows through the period at the end and inserting ``; 
except that the lineal feet in the second phase shall be increased from 
405,000 lineal feet to 485,000 lineal feet.''.
SEC. 3032. SALTON SEA RESTORATION, CALIFORNIA.

    (a) Definitions.--In this section, the following definitions apply:
            (1) Salton sea authority.--The term ``Salton Sea Authority'' 
        means the joint powers authority established under the laws of 
        the State by a joint power agreement signed on June 2, 1993.
            (2) Salton sea science office.--The term ``Salton Sea 
        Science Office'' means the office established by the United 
        States Geological Survey and located on the date of enactment of 
        this Act in La Quinta, California.
            (3) State.--The term ``State'' means the State of 
        California.

    (b) Pilot Projects.--
            (1) In general.--
                    (A) Review.--The Secretary shall review the plan 
                approved by the State, entitled the ``Salton Sea 
                Ecosystem Restoration Program Preferred Alternative 
                Report and Funding Plan'', and dated May 2007 to 
                determine whether the pilot projects described in the 
                plan are feasible.
                    (B) Implementation.--
                          (i) In general.--Subject to clause (ii), if 
                      the Secretary determines that the pilot projects 
                      referred to in subparagraph (A) meet the 
                      requirements described in that subparagraph, the 
                      Secretary may--
                                    (I) enter into an agreement with the 
                                State; and

[[Page 121 STAT. 1114]]

                                    (II) in consultation with the Salton 
                                Sea Authority and the Salton Sea Science 
                                Office, carry out pilot projects for 
                                improvement of the environment in the 
                                area of the Salton Sea.
                          (ii) Requirement.--The Secretary shall be a 
                      party to each contract for construction entered 
                      into under this subparagraph.
            (2) Local participation.--In prioritizing pilot projects 
        under this section, the Secretary shall--
                    (A) consult with the State, the Salton Sea 
                Authority, and the Salton Sea Science Office; and
                    (B) take into consideration the priorities of the 
                State and the Salton Sea Authority.
            (3) <<NOTE: Contracts.>> Cost sharing.--Before carrying out 
        a pilot project under this section, the Secretary shall enter 
        into a written agreement with the State that requires the non-
        Federal interest for the pilot project to pay 35 percent of the 
        total costs of the pilot project.

    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out subsection (b) $30,000,000, of which not more 
than $5,000,000 shall be used for any one pilot project under this 
section.
SEC. 3033. SANTA ANA RIVER MAINSTEM, CALIFORNIA.

    The project for flood control, Santa Ana River Mainstem (including 
Santiago Creek, California), authorized by section 401(a) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4113) and modified by 
section 104 of the Energy and Water Development Appropriation Act, 1988 
(101 Stat. 1329-111) and section 309 of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3713), is further modified to authorize the 
Secretary to carry out the project at a total cost of $1,800,000,000 and 
to clarify that the Santa Ana River Interceptor Line is an element of 
the project.
SEC. 3034. SANTA BARBARA STREAMS, LOWER MISSION CREEK, CALIFORNIA.

    The project for flood damage reduction, Santa Barbara streams, Lower 
Mission Creek, California, authorized by section 101(b)(8) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2577), is modified to 
authorize the Secretary to construct the project at a total cost of 
$30,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $15,000,000 and an 
estimated non-Federal cost of $15,000,000.
SEC. 3035. SANTA CRUZ HARBOR, CALIFORNIA.

    The project for navigation, Santa Cruz Harbor, California, 
authorized by section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1958 (72 Stat. 
300) and modified by section 809 of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1986 (100 Stat. 4168) and section 526 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 346), is modified to direct the 
Secretary--
            (1) to renegotiate the memorandum of agreement with the non-
        Federal interest to increase the annual payment to reflect the 
        updated cost of operation and maintenance that is the Federal 
        and non-Federal share as provided by law based on the project 
        purpose; and
            (2) to revise the memorandum of agreement to include terms 
        that revise such payments for inflation.

[[Page 121 STAT. 1115]]

SEC. 3036. SEVEN OAKS DAM, CALIFORNIA.

    The project for flood control, Santa Ana Mainstem, authorized by 
section 401(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 
4113) and modified by section 104 of the Energy and Water Development 
Appropriations Act, 1988 (101 Stat. 1329-11), section 102(e) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (104 Stat. 4611), and section 
311 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3713), is 
modified to direct the Secretary--
            (1) to include ecosystem restoration benefits in the 
        calculation of benefits for the Seven Oaks Dam, California, 
        portion of the project; and
            (2) <<NOTE: Study.>> to conduct a study of water 
        conservation and water quality at the Seven Oaks Dam.
SEC. 3037. UPPER GUADALUPE RIVER, CALIFORNIA.

    The project for flood damage reduction and recreation, Upper 
Guadalupe River, California, authorized by section 101(a)(9) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 275), is modified to 
authorize the Secretary to construct the project generally in accordance 
with the Upper Guadalupe River Flood Damage Reduction, San Jose, 
California, Limited Reevaluation Report, dated March 2004, at a total 
cost of $256,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $136,700,000 and 
an estimated non-Federal cost of $119,300,000.
SEC. 3038. WALNUT CREEK CHANNEL, CALIFORNIA.

    The project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Walnut Creek Channel, 
California, being carried out under section 206 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 2330), is modified--
            (1) to direct the Secretary to credit, in accordance with 
        section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-
        5b), toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the project the 
        cost of work carried out by the non-Federal interest for the 
        project before the date of the partnership agreement for the 
        project; and
            (2) to authorize the Secretary to consider national 
        ecosystem restoration benefits in determining the Federal 
        interest in the project.
SEC. 3039. WILDCAT/SAN PABLO CREEK PHASE I, CALIFORNIA.

    The project for improvement of the quality of the environment, 
Wildcat/San Pablo Creek Phase I, California, being carried out under 
section 1135 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 
2309a), is modified to direct the Secretary to credit, in accordance 
with section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), 
toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the project the cost of work 
carried out by the non-Federal interest for the project before the date 
of the partnership agreement for the project.
SEC. 3040. WILDCAT/SAN PABLO CREEK PHASE II, CALIFORNIA.

    The project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Wildcat/San Pablo 
Creek Phase II, California, being carried out under section 206 of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 2330), is modified to 
direct the Secretary to credit, in accordance with section 221 of the 
Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-

[[Page 121 STAT. 1116]]

5b), toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the project the cost of 
work carried out by the non-Federal interest for the project before the 
date of the partnership agreement for the project and to authorize the 
Secretary to consider national ecosystem restoration benefits in 
determining the Federal interest in the project.
SEC. 3041. YUBA RIVER BASIN PROJECT, CALIFORNIA.

    The project for flood damage reduction, Yuba River Basin, 
California, authorized by section 101(a)(10) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 275), is modified--
            (1) to authorize the Secretary to construct the project at a 
        total cost of $107,700,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
        $70,000,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $37,700,000; 
        and
            (2) to direct the Secretary to credit, in accordance with 
        section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-
        5b), toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the project the 
        cost of work carried out by the non-Federal interest for the 
        project before the date of the partnership agreement for the 
        project.
SEC. 3042. SOUTH PLATTE RIVER BASIN, COLORADO.

    Section 808 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 
Stat. 4168) is amended by striking ``agriculture,'' and inserting 
``agriculture, environmental restoration,''.
SEC. 3043. INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, DELAWARE RIVER TO CHESAPEAKE 
                          BAY, DELAWARE AND MARYLAND.

    The project for navigation, Intracoastal Waterway, Delaware River to 
Chesapeake Bay, Delaware and Maryland, authorized by the first section 
of the Rivers and Harbors Act of August 30, 1935 (49 Stat. 1030), and 
section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1954 (68 Stat. 1249), is 
modified to add recreation as a project purpose.
SEC. 3044. ST. GEORGE'S BRIDGE, DELAWARE.

    Section 102(g) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (104 
Stat. 4612) is amended by adding at the end the following: 
``The <<NOTE: Deadline.>> Secretary shall assume ownership 
responsibility for the replacement bridge not later than the date on 
which the construction of the bridge is completed and the contractors 
are released of their responsibility by the State. In addition, the 
Secretary may not carry out any action to close or remove the St. 
George's Bridge, Delaware, without specific congressional 
authorization.''.
SEC. 3045. BREVARD COUNTY, FLORIDA.

    (a) Shoreline.--The project for shoreline protection, Brevard 
County, Florida, authorized by section 101(b)(7) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3667), is modified to authorize the 
Secretary to include the mid-reach as an element of the project from the 
Florida department of environmental protection monuments 75.4 to 118.3, 
a distance of approximately 7.6 miles. <<NOTE: Reports.>> The 
restoration work shall only be undertaken upon a determination by the 
Secretary, following completion of the general reevaluation report 
authorized by section 418 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 
(114 Stat. 2637), that the shoreline protection is feasible.

[[Page 121 STAT. 1117]]

    (b) Credit.--Section 310 of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1999 (113 Stat. 301) is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(d) Credit.--After completion of the study, the Secretary may 
credit, in accordance with section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 
(42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the 
project for shore protection the cost of nourishment and renourishment 
associated with the project for shore protection incurred by the non-
Federal interest to respond to damages to Brevard County beaches that 
are the result of a Federal navigation project, as determined in the 
final report for the study.''.
SEC. 3046. BROWARD COUNTY AND HILLSBORO INLET, FLORIDA.

    The project for shore protection, Broward County and Hillsboro 
Inlet, Florida, authorized by section 301 of the River and Harbor Act of 
1965 (79 Stat. 1090), and modified by section 311 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 301), is modified to direct the 
Secretary to credit, in accordance with section 221 of the Flood Control 
Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), toward the non-Federal share of the 
cost of the project the cost of mitigation construction and derelict 
erosion control structure removal carried out by the non-Federal 
interest for the project before the date of the partnership agreement 
for the project.
SEC. 3047. CANAVERAL HARBOR, FLORIDA.

    In carrying out the project for navigation, Canaveral Harbor, 
Florida, authorized by section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1962 
(76 Stat. 1174), the Secretary shall construct a sediment trap if the 
Secretary determines construction of the sediment trap is feasible.
SEC. 3048. GASPARILLA AND ESTERO ISLANDS, FLORIDA.

    The project for shore protection, Gasparilla and Estero Island 
segments, Lee County, Florida, authorized by section 201 of the Flood 
Control Act of 1965 (79 Stat. 1073), by Senate Resolution dated December 
17, 1970, and by House Resolution dated December 15, 1970, and modified 
by section 309 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 
2602), is modified to direct the Secretary to credit, in accordance with 
section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), 
toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the project the cost of work 
carried out by the non-Federal interest for the project before the date 
of the partnership agreement for the project.
SEC. 3049. LIDO KEY BEACH, SARASOTA, FLORIDA.

    (a) In General.--The project for shore protection, Lido Key Beach, 
Sarasota, Florida, authorized by section 101 of the River and Harbor Act 
of 1970 (84 Stat. 1819), deauthorized under section 1001(b) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 579a(b)), and reauthorized 
by section 364(2)(A) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 
Stat. 313), is modified to direct the Secretary to construct the project 
substantially in accordance with the report of the Chief of Engineers 
dated December 22, 2004, at a total cost of $15,190,000, with an 
estimated Federal cost of $9,320,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost 
of $5,870,000, and at an estimated total cost of $65,000,000 for 
periodic nourishment over the 50-year life of the project, with an 
estimated

[[Page 121 STAT. 1118]]

Federal cost of $30,550,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
$34,450,000.
    (b) Construction of Shoreline Protection Projects by Non-Federal 
Interests.--The <<NOTE: Contracts.>> Secretary shall enter into a 
partnership agreement with the non-Federal interest in accordance with 
section 206 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (33 U.S.C. 
426i-1) for the modified project.
SEC. 3050. PEANUT ISLAND, FLORIDA.

    The maximum amount of Federal funds that may be expended for the 
project for improvement of the quality of the environment, Peanut 
Island, Palm Beach County, Florida, being carried out under section 1135 
of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2309a) shall 
be $9,750,000.
SEC. 3051. PORT SUTTON, FLORIDA.

    The project for navigation, Port Sutton, Florida, authorized by 
section 101(b)(12) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 
Stat. 2577), is modified to authorize the Secretary to carry out the 
project at a total cost of $12,900,000.
SEC. 3052. TAMPA HARBOR-BIG BEND CHANNEL, FLORIDA.

    The project for navigation, Tampa Harbor-Big Bend Channel, Florida, 
authorized by section 101(a)(18) of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1999 (113 Stat. 276) is modified to direct the Secretary to credit, 
in accordance with section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 
U.S.C. 1962d-5b), toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the 
project the cost of planning, design, and construction work carried out 
by the non-Federal interest for the project before the date of the 
partnership agreement for the project.
SEC. 3053. TAMPA HARBOR CUT B, FLORIDA.

    (a) In General.--The project for navigation, Tampa Harbor, Florida, 
authorized by section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1970 (84 Stat. 
1818), is modified to authorize the Secretary to construct passing lanes 
in an area approximately 3.5 miles long and centered on Tampa Harbor Cut 
B if the Secretary determines that such improvements are necessary for 
navigation safety.
    (b) General Reevaluation Report.--The non-Federal share of the cost 
of the general reevaluation report for Tampa Harbor, Florida, being 
conducted on June 1, 2005, shall be the same percentage as the non-
Federal share of the cost of construction of the project.
    (c) Agreement.--The Secretary shall enter into a new partnership 
agreement with the non-Federal interest to reflect the cost sharing 
required by subsection (b).
SEC. 3054. ALLATOONA LAKE, GEORGIA.

    (a) Land Exchange.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary may exchange land above 863 
        feet in elevation at Allatoona Lake, Georgia, identified in the 
        Real Estate Design Memorandum prepared by the Mobile district 
        engineer, April 5, 1996, and approved October 8, 1996, for land 
        on the north side of Allatoona Lake that is required for 
        wildlife management and protection of the water quality and 
        overall environment of Allatoona Lake.

[[Page 121 STAT. 1119]]

            (2) Terms and conditions.--The basis for all land exchanges 
        under this subsection shall be a fair market appraisal to ensure 
        that land exchanged is of equal value.

    (b) Disposal and Acquisition of Land, Allatoona Lake, Georgia.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary may--
                    (A) sell land above 863 feet in elevation at 
                Allatoona Lake, Georgia, identified in the memorandum 
                referred to in subsection (a)(1); and
                    (B) use the proceeds of the sale, without further 
                appropriation, to pay costs associated with the purchase 
                of land required for wildlife management and protection 
                of the water quality and overall environment of 
                Allatoona Lake.
            (2) Terms and conditions.--
                    (A) Willing sellers.--Land acquired under this 
                subsection shall be by negotiated purchase from willing 
                sellers only.
                    (B) Basis.--The basis for all transactions under 
                this subsection shall be a fair market value appraisal 
                acceptable to the Secretary.
                    (C) Sharing of costs.--Each purchaser of land under 
                this subsection shall share in the associated costs of 
                the purchase, including surveys and associated fees in 
                accordance with the memorandum referred to in subsection 
                (a)(1).
                    (D) Other conditions.--The Secretary may impose on 
                the sale and purchase of land under this subsection such 
                other conditions as the Secretary determines to be 
                appropriate.

    (c) Repeal.--Section 325 of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1992 (106 Stat. 4849) is repealed.
SEC. 3055. LATHAM RIVER, GLYNN COUNTY, GEORGIA.

    The maximum amount of Federal funds that may be expended for the 
project for improvement of the quality of the environment, Latham River, 
Glynn County, Georgia, being carried out under section 1135 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2309a) shall be $6,175,000.
SEC. 3056. DWORSHAK RESERVOIR IMPROVEMENTS, IDAHO.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall carry out additional general 
construction measures to allow for operation at lower pool levels to 
satisfy the recreation mission at Dworshak Dam, Idaho.
    (b) Improvements.--In carrying out subsection (a), the Secretary 
shall provide for appropriate improvements to--
            (1) facilities that are operated by the Corps of Engineers; 
        and
            (2) facilities that, as of the date of enactment of this 
        Act, are leased, permitted, or licensed for use by others.

    (c) Cost Sharing.--The Secretary shall carry out this section 
through a cost-sharing program with Idaho State parks and recreation 
department at a total estimated project cost of $5,300,000. 
Notwithstanding section 103 of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1986 (33 U.S.C. 2313), the Federal share of such cost shall be 75 
percent.

[[Page 121 STAT. 1120]]

SEC. 3057. LITTLE WOOD RIVER, GOODING, IDAHO.

    (a) In General.--The project for flood control, Gooding, Idaho, 
constructed under the emergency conservation work program established 
under the Act of March 31, 1933 (16 U.S.C. 585 et seq.), is modified--
            (1) to direct the Secretary to rehabilitate the Gooding 
        Channel project for the purposes of flood control and ecosystem 
        restoration if the Secretary determines that such rehabilitation 
        is not required as a result of improper operation and 
        maintenance of the project by the non-Federal interest and that 
        the rehabilitation and ecosystem restoration is feasible; and
            (2) to direct the Secretary to plan, design, and construct 
        the project at a total cost of $9,000,000.

    (b) Cost Sharing.--
            (1) In general.--Costs for reconstruction of a project under 
        this section shall be shared by the Secretary and the non-
        Federal interest in the same percentages as the costs of 
        construction of the original project were shared.
            (2) Operation, maintenance, and repair costs.--The costs of 
        operation, maintenance, repair, and rehabilitation of a project 
        carried out under this section shall be a non-Federal 
        responsibility.

    (c) Economic Justification.--Reconstruction efforts and activities 
carried out under this section shall not require economic justification.
SEC. 3058. BEARDSTOWN COMMUNITY BOAT HARBOR, BEARDSTOWN, ILLINOIS.

    (a) In General.--The project for navigation, Muscooten Bay, Illinois 
River, Beardstown Community Boat Harbor, Beardstown, Illinois, 
constructed under section 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960 (33 
U.S.C. 577), is modified--
            (1) to include the channel between the harbor and the 
        Illinois River; and
            (2) to direct the Secretary to enter into a partnership 
        agreement with the city of Beardstown to replace the local 
        cooperation agreement dated August 18, 1983, with the Beardstown 
        Community Park District.

    (b) Terms of Partnership Agreement.--The partnership agreement 
referred to in subsection (a) shall include the same rights and 
responsibilities as the local cooperation agreement dated August 18, 
1983, changing only the identity of the non-Federal sponsor.
    (c) Maintenance.--Following execution of the partnership agreement 
referred to in subsection (a), the Secretary may carry out maintenance 
of the project referred to in subsection (a) on an annual basis.
SEC. 3059. CACHE RIVER LEVEE, ILLINOIS.

    The Cache River Levee constructed for flood control at the Cache 
River, Illinois, and authorized by the Act of June 28, 1938 (52 Stat. 
1217), is modified to add environmental restoration as a project 
purpose.
SEC. 3060. CHICAGO RIVER, ILLINOIS.

    The Federal navigation channel for the North Branch Channel portion 
of the Chicago River authorized by section 22 of the Act

[[Page 121 STAT. 1121]]

of March 3, 1899 (30 Stat. 1156), extending from 100 feet downstream of 
the Halsted Street Bridge to 100 feet upstream of the Division Street 
Bridge, Chicago, Illinois, shall be no wider than 66 feet.
SEC. 3061. CHICAGO SANITARY AND SHIP CANAL DISPERSAL BARRIERS 
                          PROJECT, ILLINOIS.

    (a) Treatment as Single Project.--The Chicago Sanitary and Ship 
Canal Dispersal Barrier Project (in this section referred to as 
``Barrier I''), as in existence on the date of enactment of this Act and 
constructed as a demonstration project under section 1202(i)(3) of the 
Nonindigenous Aquatic Nuisance Prevention and Control Act of 1990 (16 
U.S.C. 4722(i)(3)), and the project relating to the Chicago Sanitary and 
Ship Canal Dispersal Barrier, authorized by section 345 of the District 
of Columbia Appropriations Act, 2005 (Public Law 108-335; 118 Stat. 
1352) (in this section referred to as ``Barrier II'') shall be 
considered to constitute a single project.
    (b) Authorization.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary, at Federal expense, shall--
                    (A) upgrade and make permanent Barrier I;
                    (B) construct Barrier II, notwithstanding the 
                project cooperation agreement with the State of Illinois 
                dated June 14, 2005;
                    (C) operate and maintain Barrier I and Barrier II as 
                a system to optimize effectiveness;
                    (D) conduct, in consultation with appropriate 
                Federal, State, local, and nongovernmental entities, a 
                study of a range of options and technologies for 
                reducing impacts of hazards that may reduce the efficacy 
                of the Barriers; and
                    (E) provide to each State a credit in an amount 
                equal to the amount of funds contributed by the State 
                toward Barrier II.
            (2) Use of credit.--A State may apply a credit provided to 
        the State under paragraph (1)(E) to any cost sharing 
        responsibility for an existing or future Federal project carried 
        out by the Secretary in the State.

    (c) Conforming Amendment.--Section 345 of the District of Columbia 
Appropriations Act, 2005 (Public Law 108-335; 118 Stat. 1352) is amended 
to read as follows:
``SEC. 345. CHICAGO SANITARY AND SHIP CANAL DISPERSAL BARRIER, 
                        ILLINOIS.

    ``There <<NOTE: Appropriation authorization.>> are authorized to be 
appropriated such sums as may be necessary to carry out the Barrier II 
element of the project for the Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal Dispersal 
Barrier, Illinois, initiated pursuant to section 1135 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2294 note; 100 Stat. 
4251).''.

    (d) Feasibility Study.--The Secretary, in consultation with 
appropriate Federal, State, local, and nongovernmental entities, shall 
conduct, at Federal expense, a feasibility study of the range of options 
and technologies available to prevent the spread of aquatic nuisance 
species between the Great Lakes and Mississippi River Basins through the 
Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal and other aquatic pathways.

[[Page 121 STAT. 1122]]

SEC. 3062. EMIQUON, ILLINOIS.

    (a) Maximum Amount.--The maximum amount of Federal funds that may be 
expended for the project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Emiquon, 
Illinois, being carried out under section 206 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 2330), shall be $7,500,000.
    (b) Limitation.--Nothing in this section shall affect the 
eligibility of the project for emergency repair assistance under section 
5 of the Act entitled ``An Act authorizing the construction of certain 
public works on rivers and harbors for flood control, and for other 
purposes'', approved August 18, 1941 (33 U.S.C. 701n).
SEC. 3063. LASALLE, ILLINOIS.

    In carrying out section 312 of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1990 (104 Stat. 4639-4640), the Secretary shall give priority to work 
in the vicinity of LaSalle, Illinois, on the Illinois and Michigan 
Canal.
SEC. 3064. SPUNKY BOTTOMS, ILLINOIS.

    (a) Project Purpose.--The project for flood control, Spunky Bottoms, 
Illinois, authorized by section 5 of the Flood Control Act of June 22, 
1936 (49 Stat. 1583), is modified to add environmental restoration as a 
project purpose.
    (b) Maximum Amount.--The maximum amount of Federal funds that may be 
expended for the project for improvement of the quality of the 
environment, Spunky Bottoms, Illinois, being carried out under section 
1135 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2309a), 
shall be $7,500,000.
    (c) Limitation.--Nothing in this section shall affect the 
eligibility of the project for emergency repair assistance under section 
5 of the Act entitled ``An Act authorizing the construction of certain 
public works on rivers and harbors for flood control, and for other 
purposes'', approved August 18, 1941 (33 U.S.C. 701n).
    (d) Post Construction Monitoring and Management.--Of the Federal 
funds expended under subsection (b), not less than $500,000 shall remain 
available for a period of 5 years after the date of completion of 
construction of the modifications for use in carrying out post 
construction monitoring and adaptive management.
SEC. 3065. CEDAR LAKE, INDIANA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary is authorized to plan, design, and 
construct an aquatic ecosystem restoration project at Cedar Lake, 
Indiana.
    (b) Complete Feasibility Report.--In planning the project authorized 
by subsection (a), the Secretary shall expedite completion of the 
feasibility report for the project for aquatic ecosystem restoration and 
protection, Cedar Lake, Indiana, initiated pursuant to section 206 of 
the Water Resources Development Act 1996 (33 U.S.C. 2330).
    (c) Authorization.--
            (1) In general.--There is authorized to be appropriated 
        $11,050,000 to carry out the activities authorized by this 
        section.
            (2) Other.--The Secretary is authorized to use funds 
        previously appropriated for the project for aquatic ecosystem 
        restoration and protection, Cedar Lake, Indiana, under section

[[Page 121 STAT. 1123]]

        206 of the Water Resources Development Act 1996 (33 U.S.C. 2330) 
        to carry out the activities authorized by this section.
SEC. 3066. KOONTZ LAKE, INDIANA.

    The project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Koontz Lake, Indiana, 
being carried out under section 206 of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 2330) and modified by section 520 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2655), is modified to 
direct the Secretary to seek to reduce the cost of the project by using 
innovative technologies and cost reduction measures determined from a 
review of non-Federal lake dredging projects in the vicinity of Koontz 
Lake.
SEC. 3067. WHITE RIVER, INDIANA.

    The project for flood control, Indianapolis on West Fork of White 
River, Indiana, authorized by section 5 of the Act entitled ``An Act 
authorizing the construction of certain public works on rivers and 
harbors for flood control, and for other purposes'', approved June 22, 
1936 (49 Stat. 1586), and modified by section 323 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3716) and section 322 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 303), is modified--
            (1) to authorize the Secretary to carry out the ecosystem 
        restoration, recreation, and flood damage reduction components 
        described in the Central Indianapolis Waterfront Concept Plan, 
        dated February 1994, and revised by the Master Plan Revision 
        Central Indianapolis Waterfront, dated April 2004, at a total 
        cost of $28,545,000; and
            (2) to direct the Secretary to credit, in accordance with 
        section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-
        5b), toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the project the 
        cost of planning, design, and construction work carried out by 
        the non-Federal interest for the project before the date of the 
        partnership agreement for the project.
SEC. 3068. DES MOINES RIVER AND GREENBELT, IOWA.

    The project for the Des Moines Recreational River and Greenbelt, 
Iowa, authorized by Public Law 99-88 and modified by section 604 of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4153), is modified to 
authorize the Secretary to carry out ecosystem restoration, recreation, 
and flood damage reduction components of the project, at a Federal cost 
of $10,000,000.
SEC. 3069. PERRY CREEK, IOWA.

    (a) In General.--On making a determination described in subsection 
(b), the Secretary shall increase the Federal contribution by up to 
$4,000,000 for the project for flood control, Perry Creek, Iowa, 
authorized by section 401(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1986 (100 Stat. 4116) and modified by section 151 of the Energy and 
Water Development Appropriations Act, 2004 (117 Stat. 1844).
    (b) <<NOTE: Certification.>> Determination.--A determination 
referred to in subsection (a) is a determination that a modification to 
the project described in subsection (a) is necessary for the Federal 
Emergency Management Agency to certify that the project provides flood 
damage reduction benefits to at least a 100-year level of flood 
protection.

    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $4,000,000.

[[Page 121 STAT. 1124]]

SEC. 3070. RATHBUN LAKE, IOWA.

    (a) Right of First Refusal.--The Secretary shall provide, in 
accordance with the recommendations in the Rathbun Lake Reallocation 
Report approved by the Chief of Engineers on July 22, 1985, the Rathbun 
Regional Water Association with the right of first refusal to contract 
for or purchase any increment of the remaining allocation of 8,320 acre-
feet of water supply storage in Rathbun Lake, Iowa.
    (b) Payment of Cost.--The Rathbun Regional Water Association shall 
pay the cost of any water supply storage allocation provided under 
subsection (a).
SEC. 3071. HICKMAN BLUFF STABILIZATION, KENTUCKY.

    The project for Hickman Bluff, Kentucky, authorized by chapter II of 
title II of the Emergency Supplemental Appropriations and Rescissions 
for the Department of Defense to Preserve and Enhance Military Readiness 
Act of 1995 (109 Stat. 85), is modified to authorize the Secretary to 
repair and restore the project, at Federal expense, with no further 
economic studies or analyses, at a total cost of not more than $250,000.
SEC. 3072. MCALPINE LOCK AND DAM, KENTUCKY AND INDIANA.

    Section 101(a)(10) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 
(104 Stat. 4606) is amended by striking ``$219,600,000'' each place it 
appears and inserting ``$430,000,000''.
SEC. 3073. PRESTONSBURG, KENTUCKY.

    The Prestonsburg, Kentucky, element of the project for flood 
control, Levisa and Tug Fork of the Big Sandy and Cumberland Rivers, 
West Virginia, Virginia, and Kentucky, authorized by section 202(a) of 
the Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act, 1981 (94 Stat. 
1339), is modified to direct the Secretary to take measures to provide a 
100-year level of flood protection for the city of Prestonsburg.
SEC. 3074. AMITE RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, LOUISIANA, EAST BATON 
                          ROUGE PARISH WATERSHED.

    The project for flood damage reduction and recreation, Amite River 
and Tributaries, Louisiana, East Baton Rouge Parish Watershed, 
authorized by section 101(a)(21) of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1999 (113 Stat. 277) and modified by section 116 of division D of 
Public Law 108-7 (117 Stat. 140), is further modified--
            (1) to direct the Secretary to carry out the project with 
        the cost sharing for the project determined in accordance with 
        section 103(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 
        (33 U.S.C. 2213(a)), as in effect on October 11, 1996;
            (2) to authorize the Secretary to construct the project at a 
        total cost of $187,000,000; and
            (3) to direct the Secretary to credit, in accordance with 
        section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-
        5b), toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the project the 
        cost of work carried out by the non-Federal interest for the 
        project before the date of the partnership agreement for the 
        project.

[[Page 121 STAT. 1125]]

SEC. 3075. ATCHAFALAYA BASIN FLOODWAY SYSTEM, LOUISIANA.

    (a) Acquisition of Additional Land.--The public access feature of 
the project for flood control, Atchafalaya Basin Floodway System, 
Louisiana, authorized by section 601(a) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4142), is modified to authorize the 
Secretary to acquire from willing sellers the fee interest (exclusive of 
oil, gas, and minerals) of an additional 20,000 acres of land in the 
Lower Atchafalaya Basin Floodway for such feature.
    (b) Modification.--
            (1) In general.--Subject to paragraph (2), effective 
        November 17, 1986, the $32,000,000 limitation on the maximum 
        Federal expenditure for the first costs of the public access 
        feature referred to in subsection (a) shall not apply.
            (2) Cost.--The modification under paragraph (1) shall not 
        increase the total authorized cost of the project referred to in 
        subsection (a).

    (c) Technical Amendment.--Section 315(a)(2) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2603) is amended by inserting before 
the period at the end the following: ``and shall consider Eagle Point 
Park, Jeanerette, Louisiana, and the town of Melville, Louisiana, as 
site alternatives for such recreation features''.
SEC. 3076. ATCHAFALAYA BASIN FLOODWAY SYSTEM, REGIONAL VISITOR 
                          CENTER, LOUISIANA.

    (a) Project for Flood Control.--Notwithstanding paragraph (3) of the 
report of the Chief of Engineers dated February 28, 1983 (relating to 
recreational development in the Lower Atchafalaya Basin Floodway), the 
Secretary shall carry out the project for flood control, Atchafalaya 
Basin Floodway System, Louisiana, authorized by chapter IV of title I of 
the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 1985 (99 Stat. 313) and section 
601(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4142).
    (b) Visitors Center.--
            (1) In general.--The <<NOTE: Study.>> Secretary, in 
        consultation with the State of Louisiana, shall study, design, 
        and construct a type A regional visitors center in the vicinity 
        of Morgan City, Louisiana.
            (2) Cost sharing.--
                    (A) Cost of type b visitors center.--The cost of 
                construction of the visitors center up to the cost of 
                construction of a type B visitors center shall be shared 
                in accordance with the recreation cost-sharing 
                requirement of section 103(c) of the Water Resources 
                Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2213(c)).
                    (B) Cost of upgrading.--The non-Federal share of the 
                cost of upgrading the visitors center from a type B to 
                type A regional visitors center shall be 100 percent.
                    (C) Operation and maintenance.--The cost of 
                operation and maintenance of the visitors center shall 
                be a Federal responsibility.
            (3) Donations.--In carrying out the project under this 
        subsection, the Mississippi River Commission may accept the 
        donation of cash or other funds, land, materials, and services 
        from any non-Federal government entity or nonprofit corporation, 
        as the Commission determines to be appropriate.

[[Page 121 STAT. 1126]]

SEC. 3077. ATCHAFALAYA RIVER AND BAYOUS CHENE, BOEUF, AND BLACK, 
                          LOUISIANA.

    The project for navigation, Atchafalaya River and Bayous Chene, 
Boeuf, and Black, Louisiana, authorized by section 101 of the River and 
Harbor Act of 1968 (82 Stat. 731), is modified to authorize the 
Secretary to deepen up to a 1000-foot section of the area on the Gulf 
Intracoastal Waterway west of the Bayou Boeuf Lock and east of the 
intersection of the Atchafalaya River, at a cost not to exceed $200,000, 
to provide for ingress and egress to the port of Morgan City at a depth 
not to exceed 20 feet.
SEC. 3078. BAYOU PLAQUEMINE, LOUISIANA.

    The project for the improvement of the quality of the environment, 
Bayou Plaquemine, Louisiana, being carried out under section 1135 of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2309a), is modified 
to direct the Secretary to credit, in accordance with section 221 of the 
Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), toward the non-Federal 
share of the cost of the project the cost of work carried out by the 
non-Federal interest for the project before the date of the partnership 
agreement for the project.
SEC. 3079. CALCASIEU RIVER AND PASS, LOUISIANA.

    The project for the Calcasieu River and Pass, Louisiana, authorized 
by section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960 (74 Stat. 481), is 
modified to authorize the Secretary to provide $3,000,000 for each 
fiscal year, in a total amount of $15,000,000, for such rock bank 
protection of the Calcasieu River from mile 5 to mile 16 as the 
Secretary determines to be advisable to reduce maintenance dredging 
needs and facilitate protection of disposal areas for the Calcasieu 
River and Pass, Louisiana, if the Secretary determines that the rock 
bank protection is feasible.
SEC. 3080. RED RIVER (J. BENNETT JOHNSTON) WATERWAY, LOUISIANA.

    The project for mitigation of fish and wildlife losses, Red River 
Waterway, Louisiana, authorized by section 601(a) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4142) and modified by section 4(h) of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1988 (102 Stat. 4016), section 
102(p) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (104 Stat. 4613), 
section 301(b)(7) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 
Stat. 3710), and section 316 of the Water Resources Development Act of 
2000 (114 Stat. 2604), is modified--
            (1) to authorize the Secretary to carry out the project at a 
        total cost of $33,912,000;
            (2) to authorize the purchase and reforestation of lands 
        that have been cleared or converted to agricultural uses (in 
        addition to the purchase of bottomland hardwood); and
            (3) to incorporate wildlife and forestry management 
        practices to improve species diversity on mitigation land that 
        meets habitat goals and objectives of the United States and the 
        State of Louisiana.
SEC. 3081. MISSISSIPPI DELTA REGION, LOUISIANA.

    The Mississippi Delta Region project, Louisiana, authorized as part 
of the project for hurricane-flood protection on Lake Pontchartrain, 
Louisiana, by section 204 of the Flood Control Act of 1965 (79 Stat. 
1077) and modified by section 365 of the Water

[[Page 121 STAT. 1127]]

Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3739), is modified to 
direct the Secretary to credit, in accordance with section 221 of the 
Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), toward the non-Federal 
share of the cost of the project the costs of relocating oyster beds in 
the Davis Pond project area.
SEC. 3082. MISSISSIPPI RIVER-GULF OUTLET RELOCATION ASSISTANCE, 
                          LOUISIANA.

    (a) Port Facilities Relocation.--
            (1) Authorization of appropriations.--There is authorized to 
        be appropriated to the Assistant Secretary for Economic 
        Development (referred to in this section as the ``Assistant 
        Secretary'') $75,000,000, to remain available until expended, to 
        support the relocation of Port of New Orleans deep draft 
        facilities from the Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet (referred to 
        in this section as the ``Outlet''), the Gulf Intracoastal 
        Waterway, and the Inner Harbor Navigation Canal to the 
        Mississippi River.
            (2) Administration.--
                    (A) In general.--Amounts appropriated pursuant to 
                paragraph (1) shall be administered by the Assistant 
                Secretary pursuant to sections 209(c)(2) and 703 of the 
                Public Works and Economic Development Act of 1965 (42 
                U.S.C. 3149(c)(2), 3233).
                    (B) Requirement.--The Assistant Secretary shall make 
                amounts appropriated pursuant to paragraph (1) available 
                to the Port of New Orleans to relocate to the 
                Mississippi River within the State of Louisiana the 
                port-owned facilities that are occupied by businesses in 
                the vicinity that may be impacted due to the treatment 
                of the Outlet under title VII of this Act.

    (b) <<NOTE: Appropriation authorization.>> Revolving Loan Fund 
Grants.--There is authorized to be appropriated to the Assistant 
Secretary $85,000,000, to remain available until expended, to provide 
assistance pursuant to sections 209(c)(2) and 703 of the Public Works 
and Economic Development Act of 1965 (42 U.S.C. 3149(c)(2), 3233) to one 
or more eligible recipients under such Act to establish revolving loan 
funds to make loans for terms up to 20 years at or below market interest 
rates (including interest-free loans) to private businesses within the 
Port of New Orleans that may need to relocate to the Mississippi River 
within the State of Louisiana due to the treatment of the Outlet under 
title VII of this Act.

    (c) Requirements.--In selecting one or more recipients under 
subsection (b), the Assistant Secretary shall ensure that each recipient 
has established procedures to target lending to businesses that will be 
directly and substantially impacted by the treatment of the Mississippi 
River-Gulf Outlet under title VII of this Act.
    (d) Coordination With Secretary.--The Assistant Secretary shall 
ensure that the programs described in subsections (a) and (b) are 
coordinated with the Secretary to ensure that facilities are relocated 
in a manner that is consistent with the analysis and design of 
comprehensive hurricane protection authorized by title I of the Energy 
and Water Development Appropriations Act, 2006 (119 Stat. 2247).
    (e) Administrative Expenses.--The Assistant Secretary may use up to 
2 percent of the amounts made available under subsections (a) and (b) 
for administrative expenses.

[[Page 121 STAT. 1128]]

SEC. 3083. VIOLET, LOUISIANA.

    (a) Violet Diversion Project.--The Secretary shall design and 
implement a project for a diversion of freshwater at or near Violet, 
Louisiana, for the purposes of reducing salinity in the western 
Mississippi Sound, enhancing oyster production, and promoting the 
sustainability of coastal wetlands.
    (b) Salinity Levels.--The project shall be designed to meet, or 
maximize the ability to meet, the salinity levels identified in the 
feasibility study of the Corps of Engineers entitled ``Mississippi and 
Louisiana Estuarine Areas: Freshwater Diversion to Lake Pontchartrain 
Basin and Mississippi Sound'' and dated 1984.
    (c) Additional Measures.--
            (1) Recommendations.--If the Secretary determines that the 
        diversion of freshwater at or near Violet, Louisiana, will not 
        restore salinity levels to meet the requirements of subsection 
        (b), the Secretary shall recommend additional measures for 
        freshwater diversions sufficient to meet those levels.
            (2) Implementation.--The <<NOTE: Effective 
        date. Reports.>> Secretary shall implement measures included in 
        the recommendations developed under paragraph (1) beginning 60 
        days after the date on which a report containing the 
        recommendations is provided to the Committee on Environment and 
        Public Works of the Senate and the Committee on Transportation 
        and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives.

    (d) Non-Federal Financing Requirements.--
            (1) Estimates.--
        Before <<NOTE: Deadline. Notification. Mississippi.>> October 1 
        of each fiscal year, the Secretary shall notify the States of 
        Louisiana and Mississippi of each State's respective estimated 
        costs for that fiscal year for the activities authorized under 
        this section.
            (2) Escrow.--The States of Louisiana and Mississippi shall 
        provide the funds described in paragraph (1) by making a deposit 
        into an escrow account, or such other account, of the Treasury 
        as the Secretary determines to be acceptable within 30 days 
        after the date of receipt of the notification from the Secretary 
        under paragraph (1).
            (3) Deposits by louisiana.--
                    (A) Use of certain funds.--The State of Louisiana 
                may use funds available to the State under the coastal 
                impact assistance program authorized under section 31 of 
                the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (43 U.S.C. 1356a) 
                in meeting its cost-sharing responsibilities under this 
                section.
                    (B) Failure to provide funds.--
                          (i) In general.--If the State of Louisiana 
                      does not provide the funds under paragraph (2), 
                      the Secretary of the Interior, using funds to be 
                      disbursed to the State under the program referred 
                      to in subparagraph (A) or under the Gulf of Mexico 
                      Energy Security Act of 2006 (title I of Division C 
                      of Public Law 109-432; (43 U.S.C. 1331 note; 120 
                      Stat. 3000)), shall deposit such funds as are 
                      necessary to meet the requirements for the State 
                      under paragraph (2).
                          (ii) Deadline for deposit.--Any deposit 
                      required under clause (i) shall be made prior to 
                      any other disbursements made to the State of 
                      Louisiana under the programs referred to in clause 
                      (i).

[[Page 121 STAT. 1129]]

                    (C) Exception.--The State of Louisiana shall not be 
                required to make a deposit of its share in any fiscal 
                year in which the State of Mississippi does not make its 
                deposit following a notification under paragraph (1) or 
                the State of Mississippi notifies the Secretary that it 
                does not intend to make a deposit in that fiscal year.
            (4) Credit.--The Secretary shall credit, in accordance with 
        section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-
        5b), toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the project for 
        the costs of design work carried out by the non-Federal interest 
        for the project before the date of the partnership agreement for 
        the project.
            (5) Federal share.--The Federal share of the cost of the 
        project authorized by subsection (a) shall be 75 percent.

    (e) Schedule.--
            (1) In general.--Subject <<NOTE: Deadlines.>> to the 
        availability of appropriations, the Secretary shall complete the 
        design of the project not later than 2 years after the date of 
        enactment of this Act and shall complete the construction of the 
        project by not later than September 30, 2012.
            (2) Missed deadline.--If the Secretary does not complete the 
        design or construction of the project in accordance with 
        paragraph (1), the Secretary shall complete the design or 
        construction as expeditiously as possible.
SEC. 3084. WEST BANK OF THE MISSISSIPPI RIVER (EAST OF HARVEY 
                          CANAL), LOUISIANA.

    Section 328 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 
Stat. 304-305) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)--
                    (A) by striking ``operation and maintenance'' and 
                inserting ``operation, maintenance, rehabilitation, 
                repair, and replacement''; and
                    (B) by striking ``Algiers Channel'' and inserting 
                ``Algiers Canal Levees''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:

    ``(c) Cost Sharing.--The non-Federal share of the cost of the 
project shall be 35 percent.''.
SEC. 3085. CAMP ELLIS, SACO, MAINE.

    The maximum amount of Federal funds that may be expended for the 
project being carried out under section 111 of the River and Harbor Act 
of 1968 (33 U.S.C. 426i) for the mitigation of shore damages 
attributable to the project for navigation, Camp Ellis, Saco, Maine, 
shall be $26,900,000.
SEC. 3086. CUMBERLAND, MARYLAND.

    Section 580(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 
Stat. 375) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``$15,000,000'' and inserting 
        ``$25,750,000'';
            (2) by striking ``$9,750,000'' and inserting 
        ``$16,738,000''; and
            (3) by striking ``$5,250,000'' and inserting ``$9,012,000''.
SEC. 3087. POPLAR ISLAND, MARYLAND.

    The project for navigation and environmental restoration through the 
beneficial use of dredged material, Poplar Island, Maryland, authorized 
by section 537 of the Water Resources Development

[[Page 121 STAT. 1130]]

Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3776) and modified by section 318 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2604), is modified to 
authorize the Secretary to construct the expansion of the project in 
accordance with the report of the Chief of Engineers dated March 31, 
2006, at an additional total cost of $260,000,000, with an estimated 
Federal cost of $195,000,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
$65,000,000.
SEC. 3088. DETROIT RIVER SHORELINE, DETROIT, MICHIGAN.

    (a) In General.--The project for emergency streambank and shoreline 
protection, Detroit River Shoreline, Detroit, Michigan, being carried 
out under section 14 of the Flood Control Act of 1946 (33 U.S.C. 701r), 
is modified to include measures to enhance public access.
    (b) Maximum Federal Expenditure.--The maximum amount of Federal 
funds that may be expended for the project shall be $3,000,000.
SEC. 3089. ST. CLAIR RIVER AND LAKE ST. CLAIR, MICHIGAN.

    Section 426 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 
Stat. 326) is amended to read as follows:
``SEC. 426. ST. CLAIR RIVER AND LAKE ST. CLAIR, MICHIGAN.

    ``(a) Definitions.--In this section, the following definitions 
apply:
            ``(1) Management plan.--The term `management plan' means the 
        management plan for the St. Clair River and Lake St. Clair, 
        Michigan, that is in effect as of the date of enactment of the 
        Water Resources Development Act of 2007.
            ``(2) Partnership.--The term `Partnership' means the 
        partnership established by the Secretary under subsection 
        (b)(1).

    ``(b) Partnership.--
            ``(1) In general.--The Secretary shall establish and lead a 
        partnership of appropriate Federal agencies (including the 
        Environmental Protection Agency) and the State of Michigan 
        (including political subdivisions of the State)--
                    ``(A) to promote cooperation among the Federal 
                Government, State and local governments, and other 
                involved parties in the management of the St. Clair 
                River and Lake St. Clair watersheds; and
                    ``(B) to develop and implement projects consistent 
                with the management plan.
            ``(2) Coordination with actions under other law.--
                    ``(A) In general.--Actions taken under this section 
                by the Partnership shall be coordinated with actions to 
                restore and conserve the St. Clair River and Lake St. 
                Clair and watersheds taken under other provisions of 
                Federal and State law.
                    ``(B) No effect on other law.--Nothing in this 
                section alters, modifies, or affects any other provision 
                of Federal or State law.

    ``(c) Implementation of St. Clair River and Lake St. Clair 
Management Plan.--
            ``(1) In general.--The Secretary shall--
                    ``(A) develop a St. Clair River and Lake St. Clair 
                strategic implementation plan in accordance with the 
                management plan;

[[Page 121 STAT. 1131]]

                    ``(B) provide technical, planning, and engineering 
                assistance to non-Federal interests for developing and 
                implementing activities consistent with the management 
                plan;
                    ``(C) plan, design, and implement projects 
                consistent with the management plan; and
                    ``(D) provide, in coordination with the 
                Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, 
                financial and technical assistance, including grants, to 
                the State of Michigan (including political subdivisions 
                of the State) and interested nonprofit entities for the 
                Federal share of the cost of planning, design, and 
                implementation of projects to restore, conserve, manage, 
                and sustain the St. Clair River, Lake St. Clair, and 
                associated watersheds.
            ``(2) Specific measures.--Financial and technical assistance 
        provided under subparagraphs (B) and (C) of paragraph (1) may be 
        used in support of non-Federal activities consistent with the 
        management plan.

    ``(d) Supplements to Management Plan and Strategic Implementation 
Plan.--In consultation with the Partnership and after providing an 
opportunity for public review and comment, the Secretary shall develop 
information to supplement--
            ``(1) the management plan; and
            ``(2) the strategic implementation plan developed under 
        subsection (c)(1)(A).

    ``(e) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $20,000,000.''.
SEC. 3090. ST. JOSEPH HARBOR, MICHIGAN.

    The Secretary shall expedite development of the dredged material 
management plan for the project for navigation, St. Joseph Harbor, 
Michigan, authorized by section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1958 
(72 Stat. 299).
SEC. 3091. SAULT SAINTE MARIE, MICHIGAN.

    (a) In General.--The text of section 1149 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4254) is amended to read as follows:

    ``The Secretary shall construct, at Federal expense, a second lock, 
of a width not less than 110 feet and a length not less than 1,200 feet, 
adjacent to the existing lock at Sault Sainte Marie, Michigan, generally 
in accordance with the report of the Board of Engineers for Rivers and 
Harbors, dated May 19, 1986, and the limited reevaluation report dated 
February 2004 at a total cost of $341,714,000.''.
    (b) Conforming Repeals.--The following provisions are repealed:
            (1) Section 107(a)(8) of the Water Resources Development Act 
        of 1990 (104 Stat. 4620).
            (2) Section 330 of the Water Resources Development Act of 
        1996 (110 Stat. 3717).
            (3) Section 330 of the Water Resources Development Act of 
        1999 (113 Stat. 305).
SEC. 3092. ADA, MINNESOTA.

    In carrying out the project for flood damage reduction, Wild Rice 
River, Ada, Minnesota, under section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 
1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s), the Secretary shall allow the non-

[[Page 121 STAT. 1132]]

Federal interest to participate in the financing of the project in 
accordance with section 903(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1986 (100 Stat. 4184) if the detailed project report evaluation 
indicates that applying such section is necessary to implement the 
project.
SEC. 3093. DULUTH HARBOR, MCQUADE ROAD, MINNESOTA.

    (a) In General.--The project for navigation, Duluth Harbor, McQuade 
Road, Minnesota, being carried out under section 107 of the River and 
Harbor Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 577) and modified by section 321 of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2605), is modified to 
direct the Secretary to provide public access and recreational 
facilities as generally described in the Detailed Project Report and 
Environmental Assessment, McQuade Road Harbor of Refuge, Duluth, 
Minnesota, dated August 1999.
    (b) Credit.--The Secretary shall credit, in accordance with section 
221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), toward the 
non-Federal share of the cost of the project for the costs of design 
work carried out by the non-Federal interest for the project before the 
date of the partnership agreement for the project.
    (c) Maximum Federal Expenditure.--The maximum amount of Federal 
funds that may be expended for the project shall be $9,000,000.
SEC. 3094. GRAND MARAIS, MINNESOTA.

    The project for navigation, Grand Marais, Minnesota, carried out 
under section 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 577) is 
modified to direct the Secretary to credit, in accordance with section 
221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), toward the 
non-Federal share of the cost of the project the cost of design work 
carried out for the project before the date of the partnership agreement 
for the project.
SEC. 3095. GRAND PORTAGE HARBOR, MINNESOTA.

    The Secretary shall provide credit in accordance with section 221 of 
the Flood Control Act (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b) toward the non-Federal share 
of the cost of the navigation project for Grand Portage Harbor, 
Minnesota, carried out under section 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 
1960 (33 U.S.C. 577), for the costs of design work carried out for the 
project before the date of the partnership agreement for the project.
SEC. 3096. GRANITE FALLS, MINNESOTA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary is directed to implement the locally 
preferred plan for flood damage reduction, Granite Falls, Minnesota, at 
a total cost of $12,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
$8,000,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $4,000,000. In carrying 
out the project, the Secretary shall utilize, to the extent practicable, 
the existing detailed project report dated 2002 for the project prepared 
under the authority of section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 (33 
U.S.C. 701s).
    (b) Project Financing.--In evaluating and implementing the project 
under this section, the Secretary shall allow the non-Federal interests 
to participate in the financing of the project in accordance with 
section 903(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 
4184) if the detailed project report evaluation

[[Page 121 STAT. 1133]]

indicates that applying such section is necessary to implement the 
project.
    (c) Credit.--The Secretary shall credit, in accordance with section 
221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), toward the 
non-Federal share of the project the cost of design and construction 
work carried out by the non-Federal interest for the project before the 
date of execution of a partnership agreement for the project.
    (d) Maximum Funding.--The maximum amount of Federal funds that may 
be expended for the flood damage reduction shall be $8,000,000.
SEC. 3097. KNIFE RIVER HARBOR, MINNESOTA.

    The project for navigation, Harbor at Knife River, Minnesota, 
authorized by section 2 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of March 2, 1945 
(59 Stat. 19), is modified to direct the Secretary to develop a final 
design and prepare plans and specifications to correct the harbor 
entrance and mooring conditions at the project.
SEC. 3098. RED LAKE RIVER, MINNESOTA.

    The project for flood control, Red Lake River, Crookston, Minnesota, 
authorized by section 101(a)(23) of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1999 (113 Stat. 278), is modified to include flood protection for the 
adjacent and interconnected areas generally known as the Sampson and 
Chase/Loring neighborhoods, in accordance with the feasibility report 
supplement for local flood protection, Crookston, Minnesota, at a total 
cost of $25,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $16,250,000 and 
an estimated non-Federal cost of $8,750,000.
SEC. 3099. SILVER BAY, MINNESOTA.

    The project for navigation, Silver Bay, Minnesota, authorized by 
section 2 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of March 2, 1945 (59 Stat. 19), 
is modified to include operation and maintenance of the general 
navigation facilities as a Federal responsibility.
SEC. 3100. TACONITE HARBOR, MINNESOTA.

    The project for navigation, Taconite Harbor, Minnesota, carried out 
under section 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 577), 
is modified to include operation and maintenance of the general 
navigation facilities as a Federal responsibility.
SEC. 3101. TWO HARBORS, MINNESOTA.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding the requirements of section 107(a) 
of the River and Harbor Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 577(a)), the project for 
navigation, Two Harbors, Minnesota, being carried out under such 
authority, is justified on the basis of navigation safety.
    (b) Maximum Federal Expenditures.--The maximum amount of Federal 
funds that may be expended for the project shall be $7,000,000.
SEC. 3102. DEER ISLAND, HARRISON COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI.

    The project for ecosystem restoration, Deer Island, Harrison County, 
Mississippi, being carried out under section 204 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1992 (33 U.S.C. 2326), is modified to authorize the 
non-Federal interest to provide, in accordance with section 221 of the 
Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C.

[[Page 121 STAT. 1134]]

1962d-5b), any portion of the non-Federal share of the cost of the 
project in the form of in-kind services and materials.
SEC. 3103. JACKSON COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI.

    (a) Modification.--Section 331 of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 305) is amended by striking ``$5,000,000'' and 
inserting ``$9,000,000''.
    (b) Applicability of Credit.--The credit provided by section 331 of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 305) (as amended 
by subsection (a) of this section) shall apply to costs incurred by the 
Jackson County Board of Supervisors during the period beginning on 
February 8, 1994, and ending on the date of enactment of this Act for 
projects authorized by section 219(c)(5) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 110 Stat. 3757; 113 Stat. 
1494).
SEC. 3104. PEARL RIVER BASIN, MISSISSIPPI.

    (a) In General.--The project for flood damage reduction, Pearl River 
Basin, including Shoccoe, Mississippi, authorized by section 401(e)(3) 
of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4132), is 
modified to authorize the Secretary, subject to subsection (c), to 
construct the project generally in accordance with the plan described in 
the ``Pearl River Watershed, Mississippi, Feasibility Study Main Report, 
Preliminary Draft'', dated February 2007, at a total cost of 
$205,800,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $133,770,000 and an 
estimated non-Federal cost of $72,030,000.
    (b) Comparison of Alternatives.--Before initiating construction of 
the project, the Secretary shall compare the level of flood damage 
reduction provided by the plan that maximizes national economic 
development benefits of the project and the locally preferred plan, 
referred to as the LeFleur Lakes plan, to that portion of Jackson, 
Mississippi and vicinity, located below the Ross Barnett Reservoir Dam.
    (c) Implementation of Plan.--
            (1) In general.--If the Secretary determines under 
        subsection (b) that the locally preferred plan provides a level 
        of flood damage reduction that is equal to or greater than the 
        level of flood damage reduction provided by the national 
        economic development plan and that the locally preferred plan is 
        environmentally acceptable and technically feasible, the 
        Secretary may construct the project identified as the national 
        economic development plan, or the locally preferred plan, or 
        some combination thereof.
            (2) Construction by non-federal interests.--The non-Federal 
        interest may carry out the project under section 211 of the 
        Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 701b-13).

    (d) Project Financing.--In evaluating and implementing the project 
under this section, the Secretary shall allow the non-Federal interests 
to participate in the financing of the project in accordance with 
section 903(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 
4184) if the detailed project report evaluation indicates that applying 
such section is necessary to implement the project.
    (e) Non-Federal Cost Share.--If the locally preferred plan is 
selected for construction of the project, the Federal share of the cost 
of the project shall be limited to the share as provided

[[Page 121 STAT. 1135]]

by law for the elements of the national economic development plan.
SEC. 3105. FESTUS AND CRYSTAL CITY, MISSOURI.

    Section 102(b)(1) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 
(113 Stat. 282) is amended by striking ``$10,000,000'' and inserting 
``$13,000,000''.
SEC. 3106. L-15 LEVEE, MISSOURI.

    The portion of the L-15 levee system that is under the jurisdiction 
of the Consolidated North County Levee District and situated along the 
right descending bank of the Mississippi River from the confluence of 
that river with the Missouri River and running upstream approximately 14 
miles shall be considered to be a Federal levee for purposes of cost 
sharing under section 5 of the Act of August 18, 1941 (33 U.S.C. 701n).
SEC. 3107. MONARCH-CHESTERFIELD, MISSOURI.

    The project for flood damage reduction, Monarch-Chesterfield, 
Missouri, authorized by section 101(b)(18) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2578), is modified to direct the 
Secretary to credit, in accordance with section 221 of the Flood Control 
Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), toward the non-Federal share of the 
cost of the project the cost of the planning, design, and construction 
work carried out by the non-Federal interest for the project before the 
date of the partnership agreement for the project.
SEC. 3108. RIVER DES PERES, MISSOURI.

    The projects for flood control, River Des Peres, Missouri, 
authorized by section 101(a)(17) of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1990 (104 Stat. 4607) and section 102(13) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3668), are each modified to direct 
the Secretary to credit, in accordance with section 221 of the Flood 
Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), toward the non-Federal share 
of the cost of the project the cost of work carried out by the non-
Federal interest for the project before the date of the partnership 
agreement for the project.
SEC. 3109. LOWER YELLOWSTONE PROJECT, MONTANA.

    The Secretary may use funds appropriated to carry out the Missouri 
River recovery and mitigation program to assist the Bureau of 
Reclamation in the design and construction of the Lower Yellowstone 
project of the Bureau, Intake, Montana, for the purpose of ecosystem 
restoration.
SEC. 3110. YELLOWSTONE RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, MONTANA AND NORTH 
                          DAKOTA.

    (a) Definition of Restoration Project.--In this section, the term 
``restoration project'' means a project that will produce, in accordance 
with other Federal programs, projects, and activities, substantial 
ecosystem restoration and related benefits, as determined by the 
Secretary.
    (b) Projects.--The Secretary shall carry out, in accordance with 
other Federal programs, projects, and activities, restoration projects 
in the watershed of the Yellowstone River and tributaries in Montana, 
and in North Dakota, to produce immediate and substantial ecosystem 
restoration and recreation benefits.

[[Page 121 STAT. 1136]]

    (c) Local Participation.--In carrying out subsection (b), the 
Secretary shall--
            (1) consult with, and consider the activities being carried 
        out by--
                    (A) other Federal agencies;
                    (B) Indian tribes;
                    (C) conservation districts; and
                    (D) the Yellowstone River Conservation District 
                Council; and
            (2) seek the participation of the State of Montana.

    (d) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $30,000,000.
SEC. 3111. ANTELOPE CREEK, LINCOLN, NEBRASKA.

    The project for flood damage reduction, Antelope Creek, Lincoln, 
Nebraska, authorized by section 101(b)(19) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2578), is modified--
            (1) to direct the Secretary to credit, in accordance with 
        section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-
        5b), toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the project the 
        cost of design and construction work carried out by the non-
        Federal interest for the project before the date of the 
        partnership agreement for the project; and
            (2) to allow the non-Federal interest for the project to 
        use, and to direct the Secretary to accept, funds provided under 
        any other Federal program to satisfy, in whole or in part, the 
        non-Federal share of the project if the Federal agency that 
        provides such funds determines that the funds are authorized to 
        be used to carry out the project.
SEC. 3112. SAND CREEK WATERSHED, WAHOO, NEBRASKA.

    The project for ecosystem restoration and flood damage reduction, 
Sand Creek watershed, Wahoo, Nebraska, authorized by section 101(b)(20) 
of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2578), is 
modified--
            (1) to direct the Secretary to credit, in accordance with 
        section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-
        5b), toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the project or 
        reimbursement for the costs of any work performed by the non-
        Federal interest for the project before the approval of the 
        project partnership agreement, including work performed by the 
        non-Federal interest in connection with the design and 
        construction of 7 upstream detention storage structures;
            (2) to require that in-kind work to be credited under 
        paragraph (1) be subject to audit; and
            (3) to direct the Secretary to accept advance funds from the 
        non-Federal interest as needed to maintain the project schedule.
SEC. 3113. WESTERN SARPY AND CLEAR CREEK, NEBRASKA.

    The project for ecosystem restoration and flood damage reduction, 
Western Sarpy and Clear Creek, Nebraska, authorized by section 
101(b)(21) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 
2578), is modified to authorize the Secretary to construct the project 
at a total cost of $21,664,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
$14,082,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $7,582,000.

[[Page 121 STAT. 1137]]

SEC. 3114. LOWER TRUCKEE RIVER, MCCARRAN RANCH, NEVADA.

    The maximum amount of Federal funds that may be expended for the 
project being carried out, as of the date of enactment of this Act, 
under section 1135 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 
U.S.C. 2309a) for environmental restoration of McCarran Ranch, Nevada, 
shall be $5,775,000.
SEC. 3115. LOWER CAPE MAY MEADOWS, CAPE MAY POINT, NEW JERSEY.

    The project for navigation mitigation, ecosystem restoration, shore 
protection, and hurricane and storm damage reduction, Lower Cape May 
Meadows, Cape May Point, New Jersey, authorized by section 101(a)(25) of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 278), is modified 
to incorporate the project for shoreline erosion control, Cape May 
Point, New Jersey, carried out under section 5 of the Act entitled ``An 
Act authorizing Federal participation in the cost of protecting the 
shores of publicly owned property'', approved August 13, 1946 (33 U.S.C. 
426h), if the Secretary determines that such incorporation is feasible.
SEC. 3116. PASSAIC RIVER BASIN FLOOD MANAGEMENT, NEW JERSEY.

    The project for flood control, Passaic River, New Jersey and New 
York, authorized by section 101(a)(18) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1990 (104 Stat. 4607) and modified by section 327 of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2607), is 
modified to direct the Secretary to include the benefits and costs of 
preserving natural flood storage in any future economic analysis of the 
project.
SEC. 3117. COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS, NEW MEXICO.

    The Secretary may enter into cooperative agreements with any Indian 
tribe any land of which is located in the State of New Mexico and 
occupied by a flood control project that is owned and operated by the 
Corps of Engineers to assist in carrying out any operation or 
maintenance activity associated with the flood control project.
SEC. 3118. MIDDLE RIO GRANDE RESTORATION, NEW MEXICO.

    (a) Restoration Projects Defined.--In this section, the term 
``restoration project'' means a project that will produce, consistent 
with other Federal programs, projects, and activities, immediate and 
substantial ecosystem restoration and recreation benefits.
    (b) Project Selection.--The Secretary shall select and shall carry 
out restoration projects in the Middle Rio Grande from Cochiti Dam to 
the headwaters of Elephant Butte Reservoir in the State of New Mexico.
    (c) Local Participation.--In carrying out subsection (b), the 
Secretary shall consult with, and consider the activities being carried 
out by--
            (1) the Middle Rio Grande Endangered Species Act 
        Collaborative Program; and
            (2) the Bosque Improvement Group of the Middle Rio Grande 
        Bosque Initiative.

    (d) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated $25,000,000 to carry out this section.

[[Page 121 STAT. 1138]]

SEC. 3119. BUFFALO HARBOR, NEW YORK.

    The project for navigation, Buffalo Harbor, New York, authorized by 
section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1962 (76 Stat. 1176), is 
modified to include measures to enhance public access, at Federal cost 
of $500,000.
SEC. 3120. LONG ISLAND SOUND OYSTER RESTORATION, NEW YORK AND 
                          CONNECTICUT.

    (a) In General.--The <<NOTE: Plans.>> Secretary shall plan, design, 
and construct projects to increase aquatic habitats within Long Island 
Sound and adjacent waters, including the construction and restoration of 
oyster beds and related shellfish habitat.

    (b) Cost Sharing.--The non-Federal share of the cost of activities 
carried out under this section shall be 25 percent and may be provided 
through in-kind services and materials.
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated $25,000,000 to carry out this section.
SEC. 3121. MAMARONECK AND SHELDRAKE RIVERS WATERSHED MANAGEMENT, 
                          NEW YORK.

    (a) Watershed Management Plan Development.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary, in consultation with the 
        State of New York and local entities, shall develop watershed 
        management plans for the Mamaroneck and Sheldrake River 
        watershed for the purposes of evaluating existing and new flood 
        damage reduction and ecosystem restoration.
            (2) Existing plans.--In developing the watershed management 
        plans, the Secretary shall use existing studies and plans, as 
        appropriate.

    (b) Critical Restoration Projects.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary may participate in any 
        eligible critical restoration project in the Mamaroneck and 
        Sheldrake Rivers watershed in accordance with the watershed 
        management plans developed under subsection (a).
            (2) Eligible projects.--A critical restoration project shall 
        be eligible for assistance under this section if the project--
                    (A) meets the purposes described in the watershed 
                management plans developed under subsection (a); and
                    (B) with respect to the Mamaroneck and Sheldrake 
                Rivers watershed in New York, consists of flood damage 
                reduction or ecosystem restoration through--
                          (i) bank stabilization of the mainstem, 
                      tributaries, and streams;
                          (ii) wetland restoration;
                          (iii) soil and water conservation;
                          (iv) restoration of natural flows;
                          (v) restoration of stream stability;
                          (vi) structural and nonstructural flood damage 
                      reduction measures; or
                          (vii) any other project or activity the 
                      Secretary determines to be appropriate.

    (c) Cooperative Agreements.--In carrying out this section, the 
Secretary may enter into one or more cooperative agreements to provide 
financial assistance to appropriate Federal, State, or local governments 
or nonprofit agencies, including assistance for the implementation of 
projects to be carried out under subsection (b).

[[Page 121 STAT. 1139]]

    (d) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $30,000,000, to remain available 
until expended.
SEC. 3122. ORCHARD BEACH, BRONX, NEW YORK.

    Section 554 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 
Stat. 3781) is amended by striking ``maximum Federal cost of 
$5,200,000'' and inserting ``total cost of $20,000,000''.
SEC. 3123. PORT OF NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY, NEW YORK AND NEW 
                          JERSEY.

    The navigation project, Port of New York and New Jersey, New York 
and New Jersey, authorized by section 101(a)(2) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2576), is modified--
            (1) to authorize the Secretary to allow the non-Federal 
        interest to construct a temporary dredged material storage 
        facility to receive dredged material from the project if--
                    (A) <<NOTE: List. Deadline.>> the non-Federal 
                interest submits, in writing, a list of potential sites 
                for the temporary storage facility to the Committee on 
                Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of 
                Representatives, the Committee on Environment and Public 
                Works of the Senate, and the Secretary at least 180 days 
                before the selection of the final site; and
                    (B) at least 70 percent of the dredged material 
                generated in connection with the project suitable for 
                beneficial reuse will be used at sites in the State of 
                New Jersey to the extent that there are sufficient sites 
                available; and
            (2) to direct the Secretary to credit, in accordance with 
        section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-
        5b), toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the project the 
        cost of construction of the temporary storage facility for the 
        project.
SEC. 3124. NEW YORK STATE CANAL SYSTEM.

    Section 553(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 
Stat. 3781) is amended to read as follows:
    ``(c) New York State Canal System Defined.--In this section, the 
term `New York State Canal System' means the 524 miles of navigable 
canal that comprise the New York State Canal System, including the Erie, 
Cayuga-Seneca, Oswego, and Champlain Canals and the historic alignments 
of these canals, including the cities of Albany, Rochester, and 
Buffalo.''.
SEC. 3125. SUSQUEHANNA RIVER AND UPPER DELAWARE RIVER WATERSHED 
                          MANAGEMENT, NEW YORK.

    (a) Watershed Management Plan Development.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary, in consultation with the 
        State of New York, the Delaware or Susquehanna River Basin 
        Commission, as appropriate, and local entities, shall develop 
        watershed management plans for the Susquehanna River watershed 
        in New York State and the Upper Delaware River watershed for the 
        purposes of evaluating existing and new flood damage reduction 
        and ecosystem restoration.
            (2) Existing plans.--In developing the watershed management 
        plans, the Secretary shall use existing studies and plans, as 
        appropriate.

[[Page 121 STAT. 1140]]

    (b) Critical Restoration Projects.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary may participate in any 
        eligible critical restoration project in the Susquehanna River 
        or Upper Delaware Rivers in accordance with the watershed 
        management plans developed under subsection (a).
            (2) Eligible projects.--A critical restoration project shall 
        be eligible for assistance under this section if the project--
                    (A) meets the purposes described in the watershed 
                management plans developed under subsection (a); and
                    (B) with respect to the Susquehanna River or Upper 
                Delaware River watershed in New York, consists of flood 
                damage reduction or ecosystem restoration through--
                          (i) bank stabilization of the mainstem, 
                      tributaries, and streams;
                          (ii) wetland restoration;
                          (iii) soil and water conservation;
                          (iv) restoration of natural flows;
                          (v) restoration of stream stability;
                          (vi) structural and nonstructural flood damage 
                      reduction measures; or
                          (vii) any other project or activity the 
                      Secretary determines to be appropriate.

    (c) Cooperative Agreements.--In carrying out this section, the 
Secretary may enter into 1 or more cooperative agreements to provide 
financial assistance to appropriate Federal, State, or local governments 
or nonprofit agencies, including assistance for the implementation of 
projects to be carried out under subsection (b).
    (d) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $30,000,000, to remain available 
until expended.
SEC. 3126. MISSOURI RIVER RESTORATION, NORTH DAKOTA.

    Section 707(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 
Stat. 2699) is amended in the first sentence by striking ``$5,000,000'' 
and all that follows through ``2005'' and inserting ``$25,000,000''.
SEC. 3127. WAHPETON, NORTH DAKOTA.

    The maximum amount of Federal funds that may be allotted for the 
project for flood damage reduction, Wahpeton, North Dakota, being 
carried out under section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 (33 
U.S.C. 701s), shall be $12,000,000.
SEC. 3128. OHIO.

    Section 594 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 
Stat. 381) is amended--
            (1) by redesignating subsections (f) and (g) as subsections 
        (g) and (h), respectively; and
            (2) by inserting after subsection (e) the following:

    ``(f) Nonprofit Entities.--In accordance with section 221 of the 
Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), a non-Federal interest 
for any project carried out under this section may include a nonprofit 
entity, with the consent of the affected local government.''.

[[Page 121 STAT. 1141]]

SEC. 3129. LOWER GIRARD LAKE DAM, GIRARD, OHIO.

    Section 507 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 
Stat. 3758) is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``(a) In General.--'' before ``The 
        Secretary'';
            (2) in paragraph (1) of subsection (a) (as designated by 
        paragraph (1) of this subsection)--
                    (A) by striking ``Repair and rehabilitation'' and 
                all that follows through ``Ohio'' and inserting 
                ``Correction of structural deficiencies of the Lower 
                Girard Lake Dam, Girard, Ohio, and the appurtenant 
                features to meet the dam safety standards of the State 
                of Ohio''; and
                    (B) by striking ``$2,500,000'' and inserting 
                ``$16,000,000''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:

    ``(b) Special Rules.--The project for Lower Girard Lake Dam, Girard, 
Ohio, authorized by subsection (a)(1) is justified on the basis of 
public safety.''.
SEC. 3130. MAHONING RIVER, OHIO.

    In carrying out the project for environmental dredging, authorized 
by section 312(f)(4) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (33 
U.S.C. 1272(f)(4)), the Secretary is directed to credit, in accordance 
with section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), 
toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the project the cost of work 
carried out by the non-Federal interest for the project before the date 
of the partnership agreement for the project.
SEC. 3131. ARCADIA LAKE, OKLAHOMA.

    Payments made by the city of Edmond, Oklahoma, to the Secretary in 
October 1999 of all costs associated with present and future water 
storage costs at Arcadia Lake, Oklahoma, under Arcadia Lake Water 
Storage Contract Number DACW56-79-C-0072 shall satisfy the obligations 
of the city under that contract.
SEC. 3132. ARKANSAS RIVER CORRIDOR, OKLAHOMA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary is authorized to participate in the 
ecosystem restoration, recreation, and flood damage reduction components 
of the Arkansas River Corridor Master Plan dated October 2005. The 
Secretary shall coordinate with appropriate representatives in the 
vicinity of Tulsa, Oklahoma, including representatives of Tulsa County 
and surrounding communities and the Indian Nations Council of 
Governments.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated $50,000,000 to carry out this section.
SEC. 3133. LAKE EUFAULA, OKLAHOMA.

    (a) Project Goal.--
            (1) In general.--The goal for operation of Lake Eufaula, 
        Oklahoma, shall be to maximize the use of available storage in a 
        balanced approach that incorporates advice from representatives 
        from all the project purposes to ensure that the full value of 
        the reservoir is realized by the United States.
            (2) Recognition of purpose.--To achieve the goal described 
        in paragraph (1), recreation is recognized as a project purpose 
        at Lake Eufaula, pursuant to section 4 of the Flood Control Act 
        of December 22, 1944 (58 Stat. 889).

    (b) Lake Eufaula Advisory Committee.--

[[Page 121 STAT. 1142]]

            (1) In general.--In <<NOTE: Establishment.>> accordance with 
        the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App.), the 
        Secretary shall establish an advisory committee for the Lake 
        Eufaula, Canadian River, Oklahoma project authorized by the 
        first section of the River and Harbor Act of July 24, 1946 (60 
        Stat. 635).
            (2) Purpose.--The purpose of the committee shall be advisory 
        only.
            (3) Duties.--The <<NOTE: Recommenda- tions.>> committee 
        shall provide information and recommendations to the Corps of 
        Engineers regarding the operations of Lake Eufaula for the 
        project purposes for Lake Eufaula.
            (4) Composition.--The Committee shall be composed of members 
        that equally represent the project purposes for Lake Eufaula.

    (c) Reallocation Study.--
            (1) In general.--Subject to the appropriation of funds, the 
        Secretary shall perform a reallocation study, at Federal 
        expense, to develop and present recommendations concerning the 
        best value, while minimizing ecological damages, for current and 
        future use of the Lake Eufaula storage capacity for the 
        authorized project purposes of flood control, water supply, 
        hydroelectric power, navigation, fish and wildlife, and 
        recreation.
            (2) Factors for consideration.--The reallocation study shall 
        take into consideration the recommendations of the Lake Eufaula 
        Advisory Committee.

    (d) Pool Management Plan.--
            (1) In general.--Not <<NOTE: Deadline.>> later than one year 
        after the date of enactment of this Act, to the extent feasible 
        within available project funds and subject to the completion and 
        approval of the reallocation study under subsection (c), the 
        Tulsa district engineer, taking into consideration 
        recommendations of the Lake Eufaula Advisory Committee, shall 
        develop an interim management plan that accommodates all project 
        purposes for Lake Eufaula.
            (2) Modifications.--A modification of the plan under 
        paragraph (1) shall not cause significant adverse impacts on any 
        existing permit, lease, license, contract, public law, or 
        project purpose, including flood control operation, relating to 
        Lake Eufaula.
SEC. 3134. OKLAHOMA LAKES DEMONSTRATION PROGRAM, OKLAHOMA.

    (a) Implementation of Program.--Not <<NOTE: Deadline.>> later than 
one year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall 
implement an innovative program at the lakes located primarily in the 
State of Oklahoma that are a part of an authorized civil works project 
under the administrative jurisdiction of the Corps of Engineers for the 
purpose of demonstrating the benefits of enhanced recreation facilities 
and activities at those lakes.

    (b) Requirements.--In implementing the program under subsection (a), 
the Secretary, consistent with authorized project purposes, shall--
            (1) pursue strategies that will enhance, to the maximum 
        extent practicable, recreation experiences at the lakes included 
        in the program;

[[Page 121 STAT. 1143]]

            (2) use creative management strategies that optimize 
        recreational activities; and
            (3) ensure continued public access to recreation areas 
        located on or associated with the civil works project.

    (c) Guidelines.--Not <<NOTE: Deadline.>> later than 180 days after 
the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall issue guidelines 
for the implementation of this section, to be developed in coordination 
with the State of Oklahoma.

    (d) Report.--
            (1) In general.--Not later than 2 years after the date of 
        enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the 
        Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate and the 
        Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of 
        Representatives a report describing the results of the program 
        under subsection (a).
            (2) Inclusions.--The report under paragraph (1) shall 
        include a description of the projects undertaken under the 
        program, including--
                    (A) an estimate of the change in any related 
                recreational opportunities;
                    (B) a description of any leases entered into, 
                including the parties involved; and
                    (C) the financial conditions that the Corps of 
                Engineers used to justify those leases.
            (3) Availability to public.--The Secretary shall make the 
        report available to the public in electronic and written 
        formats.

    (e) Termination.--The authority provided by this section shall 
terminate on the date that is 10 years after the date of enactment of 
this Act.
SEC. 3135. OTTAWA COUNTY, OKLAHOMA.

    (a) In General.--There is authorized to be appropriated $30,000,000 
for the purposes set forth in subsection (b).
    (b) Purposes.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, funds 
appropriated under subsection (a) may be used for the purpose of--
            (1) the buyout of properties and permanently relocating 
        residents and businesses in or near Picher, Cardin, and 
        Hockerville, Oklahoma, from areas determined by the State of 
        Oklahoma to be at risk of damage caused by land subsidence and 
        remaining properties; and
            (2) providing funding to the State of Oklahoma to buyout 
        properties and permanently relocate residents and businesses of 
        Picher, Cardin, and Hockerville, Oklahoma, from areas determined 
        by the State of Oklahoma to be at risk of damage caused by land 
        subsidence and remaining properties.

    (c) Limitation.--The use of funds in accordance with subsection (b) 
shall not be considered to be part of a federally assisted program or 
project for purposes of Public Law 91-646 (42 U.S.C. 4601 et seq.), 
consistent with section 2301 of Public Law 109-234 (120 Stat. 455).
    (d) Consistency With State Program.--Any actions taken under 
subsection (b) shall be consistent with the relocation program in the 
State of Oklahoma under 27A O.S. Supp. 2006, sections 2201 et seq.

[[Page 121 STAT. 1144]]

    (e) Consideration of Remedial Action.--The Administrator of the 
Environmental Protection Agency shall consider, without delay, a 
remedial action under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, 
Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (42 U.S.C. 9601 et seq.) for the 
Tar Creek, Oklahoma, National Priorities List site that includes 
permanent relocation of residents consistent with the program currently 
being administered by the State of Oklahoma. Such relocation shall not 
be subject to the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property 
Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 4601 et seq.).
    (f) Estimating Costs.--In estimating and comparing the cost of a 
remedial alternative for the Tar Creek Oklahoma, National Priorities 
List site that includes the permanent relocation of residents, the 
Administrator shall not include the cost of compliance with the Uniform 
Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 
(42 U.S.C. 4601 et seq.).
    (g) Effect of Certain Remedies.--Inclusion of subsidence remedies, 
such as permanent relocation within any remedial action, shall not 
preempt, alter, or delay the right of any sovereign entity, including 
any State or tribal government, to seek remedies, including abatement, 
for land subsidence and subsidence risks under State law.
    (h) Amendment.--Section 111 of Public Law 108-137 (117 Stat. 1835) 
is amended--
            (1) by adding at the end of subsection (a) the following: 
        ``Such activities also may include the provision of financial 
        assistance to facilitate the buy out of properties located in 
        areas identified by the State as areas that are or will be at 
        risk of damage caused by land subsidence and associated 
        properties otherwise identified by the State. Any buyout of such 
        properties shall not be considered to be part of a federally 
        assisted program or project for purposes of Public Law 91-646 
        (42 U.S.C. 4601 et seq.), consistent with section 2301 of Public 
        Law 109-234 (120 Stat. 455-456).''; and
            (2) by striking the first sentence of subsection (d) and 
        inserting the following: ``Non-Federal interests shall be 
        responsible for operating and maintaining any restoration 
        alternatives constructed or carried out pursuant to this 
        section.''.
SEC. 3136. RED RIVER CHLORIDE CONTROL, OKLAHOMA AND TEXAS.

    The project for water quality control in the Arkansas and Red River 
Basin, Texas, Oklahoma, and Kansas, authorized by section 203 of the 
Flood Control Act of 1966 (80 Stat. 1420) and modified by section 
1107(a) of the Water Resources Development A of 1986 (100 Stat. 4229) is 
further modified to direct the Secretary to provide operation and 
maintenance for the Red River Chloride Control project, Oklahoma and 
Texas, at Federal expense.
SEC. 3137. WAURIKA LAKE, OKLAHOMA.

    The remaining obligation of the Waurika Project Master Conservancy 
District payable to the United States Government in the amounts, rates 
of interest, and payment schedules--
            (1) is set at the amounts, rates of interest, and payment 
        schedules that existed on June 3, 1986, with respect to the 
        project for Waurika Lake, Oklahoma; and
            (2) may not be adjusted, altered, or changed without a 
        specific, separate, and written agreement between the District 
        and the United States.

[[Page 121 STAT. 1145]]

SEC. 3138. UPPER WILLAMETTE RIVER WATERSHED ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, 
                          OREGON.

    (a) In General.--The <<NOTE: Study.>> Secretary shall conduct 
studies and ecosystem restoration projects for the upper Willamette 
River watershed from Albany, Oregon, to the headwaters of the Willamette 
River and tributaries.

    (b) Consultation.--The Secretary shall carry out ecosystem 
restoration projects under this section for the Upper Willamette River 
watershed in consultation with the Governor of the State of Oregon, the 
heads of appropriate Indian tribes, the Environmental Protection Agency, 
the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, the National Marine 
Fisheries Service, the Bureau of Land Management, the Forest Service, 
and local entities.
    (c) Authorized Activities.--In carrying out ecosystem restoration 
projects under this section, the Secretary shall undertake activities 
necessary to protect, monitor, and restore fish and wildlife habitat.
    (d) Priority.--In carrying out this section, the Secretary shall 
give priority to a project to restore the millrace in Eugene, Oregon, 
and shall include noneconomic benefits associated with the historical 
significance of the millrace and associated with preservation and 
enhancement of resources in evaluating the benefits of the project.
    (e) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $15,000,000.
SEC. 3139. DELAWARE RIVER, PENNSYLVANIA, NEW JERSEY, AND DELAWARE.

    The Secretary may remove debris from the project for navigation, 
Delaware River, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and Delaware, Philadelphia to 
the Sea.
SEC. 3140. RAYSTOWN LAKE, PENNSYLVANIA.

    The Secretary may take such action as may be necessary, including 
construction of a breakwater, to prevent shoreline erosion between .07 
and 2.7 miles south of Pennsylvania State Route 994 on the east shore of 
Raystown Lake, Pennsylvania.
SEC. 3141. SHERADEN PARK STREAM AND CHARTIERS CREEK, ALLEGHENY 
                          COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA.

    The project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Sheraden Park Stream 
and Chartiers Creek, Allegheny County, Pennsylvania, being carried out 
under section 206 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (33 
U.S.C. 2330), is modified to direct the Secretary to credit, in 
accordance with section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 
1962d-5b), up to $400,000 toward the non-Federal share of the cost of 
the project for planning and design work carried out by the non-Federal 
interest for the project before the date of the partnership agreement 
for the project.
SEC. 3142. SOLOMON'S CREEK, WILKES-BARRE, PENNSYLVANIA.

    The project for flood control, Wyoming Valley, Pennsylvania, 
authorized by section 401(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1986 (100 Stat. 4124), is modified to include as a project element the 
project for flood control for Solomon's Creek, Wilkes-Barre, 
Pennsylvania.

[[Page 121 STAT. 1146]]

SEC. 3143. SOUTH CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA.

    Section 313 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 
Stat. 4845; 109 Stat. 407; 110 Stat. 3723; 113 Stat. 310; 117 Stat. 142) 
is amended--
            (1) in subsection (g)(1) by striking ``$180,000,000'' and 
        inserting ``$200,000,000''; and
            (2) in subsection (h)(2) by striking ``Allegheny, Armstrong, 
        Beford, Blair, Cambria, Clearfield, Fayette, Franklin, Fulton, 
        Greene, Huntingdon, Indiana, Juniata, Mifflin, Somerset, Snyder, 
        Washington, and Westmoreland Counties'' and inserting 
        ``Allegheny, Armstrong, Bedford, Blair, Cambria, Fayette, 
        Franklin, Fulton, Greene, Huntingdon, Indiana, Juniata, 
        Somerset, Washington, and Westmoreland Counties''.
SEC. 3144. WYOMING VALLEY, PENNSYLVANIA.

    In carrying out the project for flood control, Wyoming Valley, 
Pennsylvania, authorized by section 401(a) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4124), the Secretary shall coordinate 
with non-Federal interests to review opportunities for increased public 
access.
SEC. 3145. NARRAGANSETT BAY, RHODE ISLAND.

    The Secretary may use amounts in the Environmental Restoration 
Account, Formerly Used Defense Sites, under section 2703(a)(5) of title 
10, United States Code, for the removal of abandoned marine camels at 
any formerly used defense site under the jurisdiction of the Department 
of Defense that is undergoing (or is scheduled to undergo) environmental 
remediation under chapter 160 of title 10, United States Code (and other 
provisions of law), in Narragansett Bay, Rhode Island, in accordance 
with the Corps of Engineers prioritization process under the Formerly 
Used Defense Sites program.
SEC. 3146. MISSOURI RIVER RESTORATION, SOUTH DAKOTA.

    (a) Membership.--Section 904(b)(1)(B) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2708) is amended--
            (1) in clause (vii) by striking ``and'' at the end;
            (2) by redesignating clause (viii) as clause (ix); and
            (3) by inserting after clause (vii) the following:
                          ``(viii) rural water systems; and''.

    (b) Reauthorization.--Section 907(a) of such Act (114 Stat. 2712) is 
amended in the first sentence by striking ``2005'' and inserting 
``2010''.
SEC. 3147. CEDAR BAYOU, TEXAS.

    (a) Credit for Planning and Design.--The project for navigation, 
Cedar Bayou, Texas, reauthorized by section 349(a)(2) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2632), is modified to 
direct the Secretary to credit, in accordance with section 221 of the 
Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), toward the non-Federal 
share of the cost of the project the cost of planning and design work 
carried out by the non-Federal interest for the project before the date 
of the partnership agreement for the project.
    (b) Cost Sharing.--Cost sharing for construction and operation and 
maintenance of the project shall be determined in accordance with 
section 101 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 
2211).

[[Page 121 STAT. 1147]]

    (c) Project for Navigation.--Section 349(a)(2) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2632) is amended by 
striking ``12 feet deep by 125 feet wide'' and inserting ``that is 10 
feet deep by 100 feet wide''.
SEC. 3148. FREEPORT HARBOR, TEXAS.

    (a) In General.--The project for navigation, Freeport Harbor, Texas, 
authorized by section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1970 (84 Stat. 
1818), is modified to provide that--
            (1) all project costs incurred as a result of the discovery 
        of the sunken vessel COMSTOCK of the Corps of Engineers are a 
        Federal responsibility; and
            (2) the Secretary shall not seek further obligation or 
        responsibility for removal of the vessel COMSTOCK, or costs 
        associated with a delay due to the discovery of the sunken 
        vessel COMSTOCK, from the Port of Freeport.

    (b) Cost Sharing.--This section does not affect the authorized cost 
sharing for the balance of the project described in subsection (a).
SEC. 3149. LAKE KEMP, TEXAS.

    (a) In General.--The <<NOTE: Effective date.>> Secretary may not 
take any legal or administrative action seeking to remove a Lake Kemp 
improvement before the earlier of January 1, 2020, or the date of any 
transfer of ownership of the improvement occurring after the date of 
enactment of this Act.

    (b) Limitation on Liability.--The United States, or any of its 
officers, agents, or assignees, shall not be liable for any injury, 
loss, or damage accruing to the owners of a Lake Kemp improvement, their 
lessees, or occupants as a result of any flooding or inundation of such 
improvements by the waters of the Lake Kemp reservoir, or for such 
injury, loss, or damage as may occur through the operation and 
maintenance of the Lake Kemp dam and reservoir in any manner.
    (c) Lake Kemp Improvement Defined.--In this section, the term ``Lake 
Kemp improvement'' means an improvement (including dwellings) located 
within the flowage easement of Lake Kemp, Texas, below elevation 1159 
feet mean sea level.
SEC. 3150. LOWER RIO GRANDE BASIN, TEXAS.

    The project for flood control, Lower Rio Grande Basin, Texas, 
authorized by section 401(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1986 (100 Stat. 4125), is modified--
            (1) to include as part of the project flood protection works 
        to reroute drainage to Raymondville Drain constructed by the 
        non-Federal interests in Hidalgo County in the vicinity of 
        Edinburg, Texas, if the Secretary determines that such work is 
        feasible;
            (2) to direct the Secretary to credit, in accordance with 
        section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-
        5b), toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the project the 
        cost of planning, design, and construction work carried out by 
        the non-Federal interest for the project before the date of the 
        partnership agreement for the project; and
            (3) <<NOTE: Determination. Deadline.>> to direct the 
        Secretary in calculating the non-Federal share of the cost of 
        the project, to make a determination, within 180 days after the 
        date of enactment of this Act, under section 103(m) of the Water 
        Resources Development Act of

[[Page 121 STAT. 1148]]

        1986 (33 U.S.C. 2213(m)) on the non-Federal interest's ability 
        to pay.
SEC. 3151. NORTH PADRE ISLAND, CORPUS CHRISTI BAY, TEXAS.

    The project for ecosystem restoration and storm damage reduction, 
North Padre Island, Corpus Christi Bay, Texas, authorized by section 556 
of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 353), is 
modified to include recreation as a project purpose.
SEC. 3152. PAT MAYSE LAKE, TEXAS.

    The Secretary is directed to accept from the city of Paris, Texas, 
$3,461,432 as payment in full of monies owed to the United States for 
water supply storage space in Pat Mayse Lake, Texas, under contract 
number DA-34-066-CIVENG-65-1272, including accrued interest.
SEC. 3153. PROCTOR LAKE, TEXAS.

    The Secretary is authorized to purchase fee simple title to all 
properties located within the boundaries, and necessary for the 
operation, of the Proctor Lake project, Texas, authorized by section 203 
of the Flood Control Act of 1954 (68 Stat. 1259).
SEC. 3154. SAN ANTONIO CHANNEL, SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS.

    The project for flood control, San Antonio Channel, Texas, 
authorized by section 203 of the Flood Control Act of 1954 (68 Stat. 
1259) as part of the comprehensive plan for flood protection on the 
Guadalupe and San Antonio Rivers in Texas and modified by section 103 of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1976 (90 Stat. 2921) and section 
335 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2611), is 
modified to authorize the Secretary to credit, in accordance with 
section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), 
toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the project the cost of 
design and construction work carried out by the non-Federal interest for 
the project.
SEC. 3155. CONNECTICUT RIVER RESTORATION, VERMONT.

    Notwithstanding section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 
U.S.C. 1962d-5b), as in effect on August 5, 2005, with respect to the 
study entitled ``Connecticut River Restoration Authority'', dated May 
23, 2001, a nonprofit entity may act as the non-Federal interest for 
purposes of carrying out the activities described in the agreement 
executed between The Nature Conservancy and the Department of the Army 
on August 5, 2005.
SEC. 3156. DAM REMEDIATION, VERMONT.

    Section 543 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 
Stat. 2673) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)(2) by striking ``and'' at the end;
            (2) in subsection (a)(3) by striking the period at the end 
        and inserting ``; and'';
            (3) by adding at the end of subsection (a) the following:
            ``(4) may carry out measures to restore, protect, and 
        preserve an ecosystem affected by a dam described in subsection 
        (b).''; and
            (4) by adding at the end of subsection (b) the following:
            ``(11) Camp Wapanacki, Hardwick.
            ``(12) Star Lake Dam, Mt. Holly.
            ``(13) Curtis Pond, Calais.

[[Page 121 STAT. 1149]]

            ``(14) Weathersfield Reservoir, Springfield.
            ``(15) Burr Pond, Sudbury.
            ``(16) Maidstone Lake, Guildhall.
            ``(17) Upper and Lower Hurricane Dam.
            ``(18) Lake Fairlee.
            ``(19) West Charleston Dam.
            ``(20) White River, Sharon.''.
SEC. 3157. LAKE CHAMPLAIN EURASIAN MILFOIL, WATER CHESTNUT, AND 
                          OTHER NONNATIVE PLANT CONTROL, VERMONT.

    Under authority of section 104 of the River and Harbor Act of 1958 
(33 U.S.C. 610), the Secretary may revise the existing General Design 
Memorandum to permit the use of chemical means of control, when 
appropriate, of Eurasian milfoil, water chestnuts, and other nonnative 
plants in the Lake Champlain basin, Vermont.
SEC. 3158. UPPER CONNECTICUT RIVER BASIN WETLAND RESTORATION, 
                          VERMONT AND NEW HAMPSHIRE.

    (a) In General.--The <<NOTE: Study.>> Secretary, in cooperation with 
the States of Vermont and New Hampshire, shall carry out a study and 
develop a strategy for the use of wetland restoration, soil and water 
conservation practices, and nonstructural measures to reduce flood 
damage, improve water quality, and create wildlife habitat in the Upper 
Connecticut River watershed.

    (b) Cooperative Agreements.--In conducting the study and developing 
the strategy under this section, the Secretary may enter into one or 
more cooperative agreements to provide technical assistance to 
appropriate Federal, State, and local agencies and nonprofit 
organizations with wetland restoration experience. Such assistance may 
include assistance for the implementation of wetland restoration 
projects and soil and water conservation measures.
    (c) Implementation.--The Secretary shall carry out development and 
implementation of the strategy under this section in cooperation with 
local landowners and local government officials.
    (d) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $5,000,000, to remain available 
until expended.
SEC. 3159. UPPER CONNECTICUT RIVER BASIN ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, 
                          VERMONT AND NEW HAMPSHIRE.

    (a) General Management Plan Development.--
            (1) In general.--The <<NOTE: Study.>> Secretary, in 
        cooperation with the Secretary of Agriculture and in 
        consultation with the States of Vermont and New Hampshire and 
        the Connecticut River Joint Commission, shall conduct a study 
        and develop a general management plan for ecosystem restoration 
        of the Upper Connecticut River ecosystem for the purposes of--
                    (A) habitat protection and restoration;
                    (B) streambank stabilization;
                    (C) restoration of stream stability;
                    (D) water quality improvement;
                    (E) aquatic nuisance species control;
                    (F) wetland restoration;
                    (G) fish passage; and
                    (H) natural flow restoration.
            (2) Existing plans.--In developing the general management 
        plan, the Secretary shall depend heavily on existing plans for 
        the restoration of the Upper Connecticut River.

[[Page 121 STAT. 1150]]

    (b) Critical Restoration Projects.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary may participate in any 
        critical restoration project in the Upper Connecticut River 
        basin in accordance with the general management plan developed 
        under subsection (a).
            (2) Eligible projects.--A critical restoration project shall 
        be eligible for assistance under this section if the project--
                    (A) meets the purposes described in the general 
                management plan developed under subsection (a); and
                    (B) with respect to the Upper Connecticut River and 
                Upper Connecticut River watershed, consists of--
                          (i) bank stabilization of the main stem, 
                      tributaries, and streams;
                          (ii) wetland restoration and migratory bird 
                      habitat restoration;
                          (iii) soil and water conservation;
                          (iv) restoration of natural flows;
                          (v) restoration of stream stability;
                          (vi) implementation of an intergovernmental 
                      agreement for coordinating ecosystem restoration, 
                      fish passage installation, streambank 
                      stabilization, wetland restoration, habitat 
                      protection and restoration, or natural flow 
                      restoration;
                          (vii) water quality improvement;
                          (viii) aquatic nuisance species control;
                          (ix) improvements in fish migration; and
                          (x) conduct of any other project or activity 
                      determined to be appropriate by the Secretary.

    (c) Cooperative Agreements.--In carrying out this section, the 
Secretary may enter into one or more cooperative agreements to provide 
financial assistance to appropriate Federal, State, or local governments 
or nonprofit agencies. Such assistance may include assistance for the 
implementation of projects to be carried out under subsection (b).
    (d) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $20,000,000. Such sums shall 
remain available until expended.
SEC. 3160. LAKE CHAMPLAIN WATERSHED, VERMONT AND NEW YORK.

    Section 542 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 
Stat. 2671) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (b)(2)--
                    (A) by striking ``or'' at the end of subparagraph 
                (D);
                    (B) by redesignating subparagraph (E) as 
                subparagraph (G); and
                    (C) by inserting after subparagraph (D) the 
                following:
                    ``(E) river corridor assessment, protection, 
                management, and restoration for the purposes of 
                ecosystem restoration;
                    ``(F) geographic mapping conducted by the Secretary 
                using existing technical capacity to produce a high-
                resolution, multispectral satellite imagery-based land 
                use and cover data set; or'';
            (2) in subsection (e)(2)(A)--
                    (A) by striking ``The non-Federal'' and inserting 
                the following:
                          ``(i) In general.--The non-Federal''; and

[[Page 121 STAT. 1151]]

                    (B) by adding at the end the following:
                          ``(ii) Approval of district engineer.--
                      Approval of credit for design work of less than 
                      $100,000 shall be determined by the appropriate 
                      district engineer.'';
            (3) in subsection (e)(2)(C) by striking ``up to 50 percent 
        of''; and
            (4) in subsection (g) by striking ``$20,000,000'' and 
        inserting ``$32,000,000''.
SEC. 3161. SANDBRIDGE BEACH, VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA.

    The project for beach erosion control and hurricane protection, 
Sandbridge Beach, Virginia Beach, Virginia, authorized by section 
101(22) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4804) 
and modified by section 338 of the Water Resources Development Act of 
2000 (114 Stat. 2612), is modified to authorize the Secretary to review 
the project to determine whether any additional Federal interest exists 
with respect to the project, taking into consideration conditions and 
development levels relating to the project in existence on the date of 
enactment of this Act.
SEC. 3162. TANGIER ISLAND SEAWALL, VIRGINIA.

    Section 577(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 
Stat. 3789) is amended by striking ``at a total cost of $1,200,000, with 
an estimated Federal cost of $900,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost 
of $300,000.'' and inserting ``at a total cost of $3,600,000.''.
SEC. 3163. DUWAMISH/GREEN, WASHINGTON.

    The project for ecosystem restoration, Duwamish/Green, Washington, 
authorized by section 101(b)(26) of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 2000 (114 Stat. 2579), is modified--
            (1) to direct the Secretary to credit, in accordance with 
        section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-
        5b), toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the project the 
        cost of work carried out by the non-Federal interest for the 
        project before the date of the partnership agreement for the 
        project; and
            (2) to authorize the non-Federal interest to provide any 
        portion of the non-Federal share of the cost of the project in 
        the form of in-kind services and materials.
SEC. 3164. <<NOTE: 16 USC 668dd note.>> MCNARY LOCK AND DAM, 
                          MCNARY NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE, 
                          WASHINGTON AND IDAHO.

    (a) Transfer of Administrative Jurisdiction.--Administrative 
jurisdiction over the land acquired for the McNary Lock and Dam project 
and managed by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service under 
cooperative agreement number DACW68-4-00-13 with the Corps of Engineers, 
Walla Walla District, is transferred from the Secretary to the Secretary 
of the Interior.
    (b) Easements.--The transfer of administrative jurisdiction under 
paragraph (1) shall be subject to easements in existence as of the date 
of enactment of this Act on land subject to the transfer.
    (c) Rights of Secretary.--
            (1) In general.--Except as provided in subparagraph (C), the 
        Secretary shall retain rights described in subparagraph (B) with 
        respect to the land for which administrative jurisdiction is 
        transferred under paragraph (1).

[[Page 121 STAT. 1152]]

            (2) Rights.--The rights of the Secretary referred to in 
        paragraph (1) are the rights--
                    (A) to flood land described in subsection (a) to the 
                standard project flood elevation;
                    (B) to manipulate the level of the McNary project 
                pool;
                    (C) to access land described in subsection (a) as 
                may be required to install, maintain, and inspect 
                sediment ranges and carry out similar activities;
                    (D) to construct and develop wetland, riparian 
                habitat, or other environmental restoration features 
                authorized by section 1135 of the Water Resources 
                Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2309a) and section 
                206 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (33 
                U.S.C. 2330);
                    (E) to dredge and deposit fill materials; and
                    (F) to carry out management actions for the purpose 
                of reducing the take of juvenile salmonids by avian 
                colonies that inhabit, before, on, or after the date of 
                enactment of this Act, any island included in the land 
                described in subsection (a).
            (3) Coordination.--Before exercising a right described in 
        any of subparagraphs (C) through (F) of paragraph (2), the 
        Secretary shall coordinate the exercise with the Director of the 
        United States Fish and Wildlife Service.

    (d) Management.--
            (1) In general.--The land described in subsection (a) shall 
        be managed by the Secretary of the Interior as part of the 
        McNary National Wildlife Refuge.
            (2) Cummins property.--
                    (A) Retention of credits.--Habitat unit credits 
                described in the memorandum entitled ``Design Memorandum 
                No. 6, LOWER SNAKE RIVER FISH AND WILDLIFE COMPENSATION 
                PLAN, Wildlife Compensation and Fishing Access Site 
                Selection, Letter Supplement No. 15, SITE DEVELOPMENT 
                PLAN FOR THE WALLULA HMU'' provided for the Lower Snake 
                River Fish and Wildlife Compensation Plan through 
                development of the parcel of land formerly known as the 
                ``Cummins property'' shall be retained by the Secretary 
                despite any changes in management of the parcel on or 
                after the date of enactment of this Act.
                    (B) Site development plan.--The Director shall 
                obtain prior approval of the Washington State department 
                of fish and wildlife for any change to the previously 
                approved site development plan for the parcel of land 
                formerly known as the ``Cummins property''.
            (3) Madame dorian recreation area.--The Director shall 
        continue operation of the Madame Dorian Recreation Area for 
        public use and boater access.

    (e) Administrative Costs.--The Director shall be responsible for all 
survey, environmental compliance, and other administrative costs 
required to implement the transfer of administrative jurisdiction under 
subsection (a).
SEC. 3165. SNAKE RIVER PROJECT, WASHINGTON AND IDAHO.

    (a) In General.--The fish and wildlife compensation plan for the 
Lower Snake River, Washington and Idaho, as authorized by section 102 of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1976 (90

[[Page 121 STAT. 1153]]

Stat. 2921), is amended to authorize the Secretary to conduct studies 
and implement aquatic and riparian ecosystem restorations and 
improvements specifically for fisheries and wildlife.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated $5,000,000 to carry out this section.
SEC. 3166. YAKIMA RIVER, PORT OF SUNNYSIDE, WASHINGTON.

    The project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Yakima River, Port of 
Sunnyside, Washington, being carried out under section 206 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 2330), is modified to 
direct the Secretary to credit, in accordance with section 221 of the 
Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), toward the non-Federal 
share of the cost of the project the cost of work carried out by the 
non-Federal interest for the project before the date of the partnership 
agreement for the project.
SEC. 3167. BLUESTONE LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, WEST VIRGINIA.

    Section 102(ff) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 
Stat. 4810, 110 Stat. 3726, 113 Stat. 312) is amended to read as 
follows:
    ``(ff) Bluestone Lake, Ohio River Basin, West Virginia.--
            ``(1) In general.--The project for flood control, Bluestone 
        Lake, Ohio River Basin, West Virginia, authorized by section 4 
        of the Flood Control Act of 1938 (52 Stat. 1217) is modified to 
        direct the Secretary to implement Plan C/G, as defined in the 
        Evaluation Report of the District Engineer dated December 1996, 
        to prohibit the release of drift and debris into waters 
        downstream of the project (other than organic matter necessary 
        to maintain and enhance the biological resources of such waters 
        and such nonobtrusive items of debris as may not be economically 
        feasible to prevent being released through such project), 
        including measures to prevent the accumulation of drift and 
        debris at the project, the collection and removal of drift and 
        debris on the segment of the New River upstream of the project, 
        and the removal (through use of temporary or permanent systems) 
        and disposal of accumulated drift and debris at Bluestone Dam.
            ``(2) Cooperative agreement.--In carrying out the downstream 
        cleanup under the plan referred to in paragraph (1), the 
        Secretary may enter into a cooperative agreement with the West 
        Virginia department of environmental protection for the 
        department to carry out the cleanup, including contracting and 
        procurement services, contract administration and management, 
        transportation and disposal of collected materials, and disposal 
        fees.
            ``(3) Initial cleanup.--The Secretary may provide the West 
        Virginia department of environmental protection up to $150,000 
        from funds previously appropriated for this purpose for the 
        Federal share of the costs of the initial cleanup under the 
        plan.''.
SEC. 3168. GREENBRIER RIVER BASIN, WEST VIRGINIA.

    Section 579(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 
Stat. 3790; 113 Stat. 312) is amended by striking ``$47,000,000'' and 
inserting ``$99,000,000''.

[[Page 121 STAT. 1154]]

SEC. 3169. LESAGE/GREENBOTTOM SWAMP, WEST VIRGINIA.

    Section 30(d) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1988 (102 
Stat. 4030; 114 Stat. 2678) is amended to read as follows:
    ``(d) Historic Structure.--The Secretary shall ensure the 
preservation and restoration of the structure known as the `Jenkins 
House' and the reconstruction of associated buildings and landscape 
features of such structure located within the Lesage/Greenbottom Swamp 
in accordance with the standards of the Department of the Interior for 
the treatment of historic properties. Amounts made available for 
expenditure for the project authorized by section 301(a) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4110) shall be available 
for the purposes of this subsection.''.
SEC. 3170. LOWER MUD RIVER, MILTON, WEST VIRGINIA.

    The project for flood control at Milton, West Virginia, authorized 
by section 580 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 
3790) and modified by section 340 of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 2000 (114 Stat. 2612), is modified to authorize the Secretary to 
construct the project substantially in accordance with the draft report 
of the Corps of Engineers dated May 2004, at an estimated total cost of 
$57,100,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $42,825,000 and an 
estimated non-Federal cost of $14,275,000.
SEC. 3171. MCDOWELL COUNTY, WEST VIRGINIA.

    The McDowell County nonstructural component of the project for flood 
control, Levisa and Tug Fork of the Big Sandy and Cumberland Rivers, 
West Virginia, Virginia, and Kentucky, authorized by section 202(a) of 
the Energy and Water Development Appropriation Act, 1981 (94 Stat. 
1339), is modified to direct the Secretary to take measures to provide 
protection, throughout McDowell County, West Virginia, from the 
reoccurrence of the greater of--
            (1) the April 1977 flood;
            (2) the July 2001 flood;
            (3) the May 2002 flood; or
            (4) the 100-year frequency event.
SEC. 3172. PARKERSBURG, WEST VIRGINIA.

    The Secretary is authorized to carry out the ecosystem restoration, 
recreation, and flood control components of the report of the Corps of 
Engineers, entitled ``Parkersburg/Vienna Riverfront Park Feasibility 
Study'', dated June 1998, as amended by the limited reevaluation report 
of the Corps of Engineers, dated March 2004, at a total cost of 
$12,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $6,000,000, and an 
estimated non-Federal cost of $6,000,000.
SEC. 3173. GREEN BAY HARBOR, GREEN BAY, WISCONSIN.

    The portion of the inner harbor of the Federal navigation channel of 
the Green Bay Harbor project, authorized by the first section of the Act 
entitled ``An Act making appropriations for the construction, repair, 
and preservation of certain public works on rivers and harbors, and for 
other purposes'', approved July 5, 1884 (23 Stat. 136), from Station 
190+00 to Station 378+00 is authorized to a width of 75 feet and a depth 
of 6 feet.
SEC. 3174. MANITOWOC HARBOR, WISCONSIN.

    The project for navigation, Manitowoc Harbor, Wisconsin, authorized 
by the River and Harbor Act of August 30, 1852 (10

[[Page 121 STAT. 1155]]

Stat. 58), is modified to direct the Secretary to deepen the upstream 
reach of the navigation channel from 12 feet to 18 feet, at a total cost 
of $405,000.
SEC. 3175. MISSISSIPPI RIVER HEADWATERS RESERVOIRS.

    Section 21 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1988 (102 Stat. 
4027) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)--
                    (A) by striking ``1276.42'' and inserting 
                ``1278.42'';
                    (B) by striking ``1218.31'' and inserting 
                ``1221.31''; and
                    (C) by striking ``1234.82'' and inserting 
                ``1235.30''; and
            (2) by striking subsection (b) and inserting the following:

    ``(b) Exception.--The Secretary may operate the headwaters 
reservoirs below the minimum or above the maximum water levels 
established in subsection (a) in accordance with water control 
regulation manuals (or revisions thereto) developed by the Secretary, 
after consultation with the Governor of Minnesota and affected tribal 
governments, landowners, and commercial and recreational 
users. <<NOTE: Effective date.>> The water control regulation manuals 
(and any revisions thereto) shall be effective when the Secretary 
transmits them to Congress. <<NOTE: Reports. Deadline.>> The Secretary 
shall report to Congress at least 14 days before operating any such 
headwaters reservoir below the minimum or above the maximum water level 
limits specified in subsection (a); except that notification is not 
required for operations necessary to prevent the loss of life or to 
ensure the safety of the dam or if the drawdown of lake levels is in 
anticipation of flood control operations.''.
SEC. 3176. UPPER BASIN OF MISSOURI RIVER.

    (a) Use of Funds.--Notwithstanding the Energy and Water Development 
Appropriations Act, 2006 (Public Law 109-103), funds made available for 
recovery or mitigation activities in the lower basin of the Missouri 
River may be used for recovery or mitigation activities in the upper 
basin of the Missouri River, including the States of Montana, Nebraska, 
North Dakota, and South Dakota.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--The matter under the heading ``Missouri 
River Mitigation, Missouri, Kansas, Iowa, and Nebraska'' of section 
601(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4143), 
as modified by section 334 of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1999 (113 Stat. 306), is amended by adding at the end the following: 
``The Secretary may carry out any recovery or mitigation activities in 
the upper basin of the Missouri River, including the States of Montana, 
Nebraska, North Dakota, and South Dakota, using funds made available 
under this paragraph in accordance with the Endangered Species Act of 
1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) and consistent with the project purposes 
of the Missouri River Mainstem System as authorized by section 10 of the 
Flood Control Act of December 22, 1944 (58 Stat. 897).''.
SEC. 3177. UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER SYSTEM ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 
                          PROGRAM.

    Section 1103(e)(1)(A)(ii) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1986 (33 U.S.C. 652(e)(1)(A)(ii)) is amended by inserting before the 
period at the end the following: ``, including research on water quality 
issues affecting the Mississippi River (including elevated nutrient 
levels) and the development of remediation strategies''.

[[Page 121 STAT. 1156]]

SEC. 3178. UPPER OHIO RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES NAVIGATION SYSTEM NEW 
                          TECHNOLOGY PILOT PROGRAM.

    (a) Upper Ohio River and Tributaries Navigation System Defined.--In 
this section, the term ``Upper Ohio River and Tributaries navigation 
system'' means the Allegheny, Kanawha, Monongahela, and Ohio Rivers.
    (b) Establishment.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary shall establish a pilot 
        program to evaluate new technologies applicable to the Upper 
        Ohio River and Tributaries navigation system.
            (2) Inclusions.--The program may include the design, 
        construction, or implementation of innovative technologies and 
        solutions for the Upper Ohio River and Tributaries navigation 
        system, including projects for--
                    (A) improved navigation;
                    (B) environmental stewardship;
                    (C) increased navigation reliability; and
                    (D) reduced navigation costs.
            (3) Purposes.--The purposes of the program shall be--
                    (A) to increase the reliability and availability of 
                federally owned and federally operated navigation 
                facilities;
                    (B) to decrease system operational risks; and
                    (C) to improve--
                          (i) vessel traffic management;
                          (ii) access; and
                          (iii) Federal asset management.

    (c) Federal Ownership Requirement.--The Secretary may provide 
assistance for a project under this section only if the project is 
federally owned.
    (d) Local Cooperation Agreements.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary shall enter into local 
        cooperation agreements with non-Federal interests to provide for 
        the design, construction, installation, and operation of the 
        projects to be carried out under the program.
            (2) Requirements.--Each local cooperation agreement entered 
        into under this subsection shall include the following:
                    (A) Plan.--Development by the Secretary, in 
                consultation with appropriate Federal and State 
                officials, of a navigation improvement project, 
                including appropriate engineering plans and 
                specifications.
                    (B) Legal and institutional structures.--
                Establishment of such legal and institutional structures 
                as are necessary to ensure the effective long-term 
                operation of the project.
            (3) Cost sharing.--Total project costs under each local 
        cooperation agreement shall be cost-shared in accordance with 
        the formula relating to the applicable original construction 
        project.
            (4) Expenditures.--
                    (A) In general.--Expenditures under the program may 
                include, for establishment at federally owned property, 
                such as locks, dams, and bridges--
                          (i) transmitters;
                          (ii) responders;
                          (iii) hardware;
                          (iv) software; and
                          (v) wireless networks.

[[Page 121 STAT. 1157]]

                    (B) Exclusions.--Transmitters, responders, hardware, 
                software, and wireless networks and other equipment 
                installed on privately owned vessels or equipment shall 
                not be eligible under the program.

    (e) Report.--Not later than December 31, 2008, the Secretary shall 
submit to Congress a report on the results of the pilot program carried 
out under this section, together with recommendations concerning whether 
the program or any component of the program should be implemented on a 
national basis.
    (f) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $3,100,000. Such sums shall 
remain available until expended.
SEC. 3179. CONTINUATION OF PROJECT AUTHORIZATIONS.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding section 1001(b)(2) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 579a(b)(2)), the following 
projects shall remain authorized to be carried out by the Secretary:
            (1) The project for navigation, Sacramento Deep Water Ship 
        Channel, California, authorized by section 202(a) of the Water 
        Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4092).
            (2) The project for flood control, Agana River, Guam, 
        authorized by section 401(a) of the Water Resources Development 
        Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4127).
            (3) The project for navigation, Baltimore Harbor and 
        Channels, Maryland and Virginia, authorized by section 101 of 
        the River and Harbor Act of 1970 (84 Stat. 1818).
            (4) The project for navigation, Fall River Harbor, 
        Massachusetts, authorized by section 101 of the River and Harbor 
        Act of 1968 (82 Stat. 731); except that the authorized depth of 
        that portion of the project extending riverward of the Charles 
        M. Braga, Jr. Memorial Bridge, Fall River and Somerset, 
        Massachusetts, shall not exceed 35 feet.
            (5) The project for flood control, Ecorse Creek, Wayne 
        County, Michigan, authorized by section 101(a)(14) of the Water 
        Resources Development Act of 1990 (104 Stat. 4607).

    (b) Limitation.--A project described in subsection (a) shall not be 
authorized for construction after the last day of the 5-year period 
beginning on the date of enactment of this Act, unless, during such 
period, funds have been obligated for the construction (including 
planning and design) of the project.
SEC. 3180. PROJECT REAUTHORIZATIONS.

    Each of the following projects may be carried out by the Secretary 
and no construction on any such project may be initiated until the 
Secretary determines that the project is feasible:
            (1) Menominee harbor and river, michigan and wisconsin.--The 
        project for navigation, Menominee Harbor and River, Michigan and 
        Wisconsin, authorized by section 101 of the River and Harbor Act 
        of 1960 (74 Stat. 482) and deauthorized on April 15, 2002, in 
        accordance with section 1001(b)(2) of the Water Resources 
        Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 579a(b)(2)).
            (2) Hearding island inlet, duluth harbor, minnesota.--The 
        project for dredging, Hearding Island Inlet, Duluth Harbor, 
        Minnesota, authorized by section 22 of the Water Resources 
        Development Act of 1988 (102 Stat. 4027).

[[Page 121 STAT. 1158]]

            (3) Manitowoc harbor, wisconsin.--That portion of the 
        project for navigation, Manitowoc Harbor, Wisconsin, authorized 
        by the first section of the River and Harbor Act of August 30, 
        1852 (10 Stat. 58), consisting of the channel in the south part 
        of the outer harbor, deauthorized by section 101 of the River 
        and Harbor Act of 1962 (76 Stat. 1176).
SEC. 3181. PROJECT DEAUTHORIZATIONS.

    (a) In General.--The following projects are not authorized after the 
date of enactment of this Act:
            (1) Bridgeport harbor, connecticut.--The portion of the 
        project for navigation, Bridgeport Harbor, Connecticut, 
        authorized by the first section of the River and Harbor Act of 
        July 3, 1930 (46 Stat. 919), consisting of an 18-foot channel in 
        Yellow Mill River and described as follows: Beginning at a point 
        along the eastern limit of the existing project, N123,649.75, 
        E481,920.54, thence running northwesterly about 52.64 feet to a 
        point N123,683.03, E481,879.75, thence running northeasterly 
        about 1,442.21 feet to a point N125,030.08, E482,394.96, thence 
        running northeasterly about 139.52 feet to a point along the 
        eastern limit of the existing channel, N125,133.87, E482,488.19, 
        thence running southwesterly about 1,588.98 feet to the point of 
        origin.
            (2) Mystic river, connecticut.--The portion of the project 
        for navigation, Mystic River, Connecticut, authorized by the 
        first section of the River and Harbor Appropriations Act of 
        September 19, 1890 (26 Stat. 436) consisting of a 12-foot-deep 
        channel, approximately 7,554 square feet in area, starting at a 
        point N193,086.51, E815,092.78, thence running north 59 degrees 
        21 minutes 46.63 seconds west about 138.05 feet to a point 
        N193,156.86, E814,974.00, thence running north 51 degrees 04 
        minutes 39.00 seconds west about 166.57 feet to a point 
        N193,261.51, E814,844.41, thence running north 43 degrees 01 
        minutes 34.90 seconds west about 86.23 feet to a point 
        N193,324.55, E814,785.57, thence running north 06 degrees 42 
        minutes 03.86 seconds west about 156.57 feet to a point 
        N193,480.05, E814,767.30, thence running south 21 degrees 21 
        minutes 17.94 seconds east about 231.42 feet to a point 
        N193,264.52, E814,851.57, thence running south 53 degrees 34 
        minutes 23.28 seconds east about 299.78 feet to the point of 
        origin.
            (3) Norwalk harbor, connecticut.--
                    (A) In general.--The portions of a 10-foot channel 
                of the project for navigation, Norwalk Harbor, 
                Connecticut, authorized by the first section of the Act 
                of March 2, 1919 (40 Stat. 1276) and described in 
                subparagraph (B).
                    (B) Description of portions.--The portions of the 
                channel referred to in subparagraph (A) are as follows:
                          (i) Rectangular portion.--An approximately 
                      rectangular-shaped section along the northwesterly 
                      terminus of the channel. The section is 35-feet 
                      wide and about 460-feet long and is further 
                      described as commencing at a point N104,165.85, 
                      E417,662.71, thence running south 24 degrees 06 
                      minutes 55 seconds east 395.00 feet to a point 
                      N103,805.32, E417,824.10, thence running south 00 
                      degrees 38 minutes 06 seconds east 87.84 feet to a 
                      point N103,717.49, E417,825.07, thence

[[Page 121 STAT. 1159]]

                      running north 24 degrees 06 minutes 55 seconds 
                      west 480.00 feet, to a point N104,155.59, 
                      E417,628.96, thence running north 73 degrees 05 
                      minutes 25 seconds east 35.28 feet to the point of 
                      origin.
                          (ii) Parallelogram-shaped portion.--An area 
                      having the approximate shape of a parallelogram 
                      along the northeasterly portion of the channel, 
                      southeast of the area described in clause (i), 
                      approximately 20 feet wide and 260 feet long, and 
                      further described as commencing at a point 
                      N103,855.48, E417,849.99, thence running south 33 
                      degrees 07 minutes 30 seconds east 133.40 feet to 
                      a point N103,743.76, E417,922.89, thence running 
                      south 24 degrees 07 minutes 04 seconds east 127.75 
                      feet to a point N103,627.16, E417,975.09, thence 
                      running north 33 degrees 07 minutes 30 seconds 
                      west 190.00 feet to a point N103,786.28, 
                      E417,871.26, thence running north 17 degrees 05 
                      minutes 15 seconds west 72.39 feet to the point of 
                      origin.
                    (C) Exclusion.--Notwithstanding any other provision 
                of this paragraph, the Secretary shall realign the 10-
                foot channel potion of the project referred to in 
                subparagraph (A) to include, immediately north of the 
                area described in subparagraph (B)(ii), a triangular 
                section described as commencing at a point N103,968.35, 
                E417,815.29, thence running south 17 degrees 05 minutes 
                15 seconds east 118.09 feet to a point N103,855.48, 
                E417,849.99, thence running north 33 degrees 07 minutes 
                30 seconds west 36.76 feet to a point N103,886.27, 
                E417,829.90, thence running north 10 degrees 05 minutes 
                26 seconds west 83.37 feet to the point of origin.
            (4) Rockland harbor, maine.--The portion of the project for 
        navigation, Rockland Harbor, Maine, authorized by the Act of 
        June 3, 1896 (29 Stat. 202), consisting of a 14-foot channel 
        located in Lermond Cove and beginning at a point with 
        coordinates N99,977.37, E340,290.02, thence running easterly 
        about 200.00 feet to a point with coordinates N99,978.49, 
        E340,490.02, thence running northerly about 138.00 feet to a 
        point with coordinates N100,116.49, E340,289.25, thence running 
        westerly about 200.00 feet to a point with coordinates 
        N100,115.37, E340,289.25, thence running southerly about 138.00 
        feet to the point of origin.
            (5) Rockport harbor, maine.--
                    (A) In general.--The portion of the project for 
                navigation, Rockport Harbor, Maine, authorized by the 
                first section of the Act of August 11, 1888 (25 Stat. 
                400), located within the 12-foot anchorage described in 
                subparagraph (B).
                    (B) Description of anchorage.--The anchorage 
                referred to in subparagraph (A) is more particularly 
                described as--
                          (i) beginning at the westernmost point of the 
                      anchorage at N128800.00, E349311.00;
                          (ii) thence running north 12 degrees, 52 
                      minutes, 37.2 seconds east 127.08 feet to a point 
                      N128923.88, E349339.32;

[[Page 121 STAT. 1160]]

                          (iii) thence running north 17 degrees, 40 
                      minutes, 13.0 seconds east 338.61 feet to a point 
                      N129246.51, E349442.10;
                          (iv) thence running south 89 degrees, 21 
                      minutes, 21.0 seconds east 45.36 feet to a point 
                      N129246.00, E349487.46;
                          (v) thence running south 44 degrees, 13 
                      minutes, 32.6 seconds east 18.85 feet to a point 
                      N129232.49, E349500.61;
                          (vi) thence running south 17 degrees, 40 
                      minutes 13.0 seconds west 340.50 feet to a point 
                      N128908.06, E349397.25;
                          (vii) thence running south 12 degrees, 52 
                      minutes, 37.2 seconds west 235.41 feet to a point 
                      at N128678.57, E349344.79; and
                          (viii) thence running north 15 degrees, 32 
                      minutes, 59.3 seconds west 126.04 feet to the 
                      point of origin.
            (6) Falmouth harbor, massachusetts.--The portion of the 
        project for navigation, Falmouth Harbor, Massachusetts, 
        authorized by section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1948 
        (62 Stat. 1172), beginning at a point along the eastern side of 
        the inner harbor N200,415.05, E845,307.98, thence running north 
        25 degrees 48 minutes 54.3 seconds east 160.24 feet to a point 
        N200,559.20, E845,377.76, thence running north 22 degrees 7 
        minutes 52.4 seconds east 596.82 feet to a point N201,112.15, 
        E845,602.60, thence running north 60 degrees 1 minute 0.3 
        seconds east 83.18 feet to a point N201,153.72, E845,674.65, 
        thence running south 24 degrees 56 minutes 43.4 seconds west 
        665.01 feet to a point N200,550.75, E845,394.18, thence running 
        south 32 degrees 25 minutes 29.0 seconds west 160.76 feet to the 
        point of origin.
            (7) Island end river, massachusetts.--The portion of the 
        project for navigation, Island End River, Massachusetts, carried 
        out under section 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960 (33 
        U.S.C. 577), described as follows: Beginning at a point along 
        the eastern limit of the existing project, N507,348.98, 
        E721,180.01, thence running northeast about 35 feet to a point 
        N507,384.17, E721,183.36, thence running northeast about 324 
        feet to a point N507,590.51, E721,433.17, thence running 
        northeast about 345 feet to a point along the northern limit of 
        the existing project, N507,927.29, E721,510.29, thence running 
        southeast about 25 feet to a point N507,921.71, E721,534.66, 
        thence running southwest about 354 feet to a point N507,576.65, 
        E721,455.64, thence running southwest about 357 feet to the 
        point of origin.
            (8) City waterway, tacoma, washington.--The portion of the 
        project for navigation, City Waterway, Tacoma, Washington, 
        authorized by the first section of the River and Harbor 
        Appropriations Act of June 13, 1902 (32 Stat. 347), consisting 
        of the last 1,000 linear feet of the inner portion of the 
        waterway beginning at station 70+00 and ending at station 80+00.
            (9) Aunt lydia's cove, massachusetts.--
                    (A) In general.--The portion of the project for 
                navigation, Aunt Lydia's Cove, Massachusetts, 
                constructed under section 107 of the River and Harbor 
                Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 577), consisting of the 8-foot 
                deep anchorage in the cove described in subparagraph 
                (B).

[[Page 121 STAT. 1161]]

                    (B) Description of portion.--The portion of the 
                project described in subparagraph (A) is more 
                particularly described as the portion beginning at a 
                point along the southern limit of the existing project, 
                N254,332.00, E1,023,103.96, thence running northwesterly 
                about 761.60 feet to a point along the western limit of 
                the existing project N255,076.84, E1,022,945.07, thence 
                running southwesterly about 38.11 feet to a point 
                N255,038.99, E1,022,940.60, thence running southeasterly 
                about 267.07 feet to a point N254,772.00, E1,022,947.00, 
                thence running southeasterly about 462.41 feet to a 
                point N254,320.06, E1,023,044.84, thence running 
                northeasterly about 60.31 feet to the point of origin.
            (10) Whatcom creek waterway, bellingham, washington.--The 
        portion of the project for navigation, Whatcom Creek Waterway, 
        Bellingham, Washington, authorized by the River and Harbor Act 
        of June 25, 1910 (36 Stat. 664), and section 101 of the River 
        and Harbor Act of 1958 (72 Stat. 299), consisting of the last 
        2,900 linear feet of the inner portion of the waterway and 
        beginning at station 29+00 to station 0+00.
            (11) Oconto harbor, wisconsin.--
                    (A) In general.--The portion of the project for 
                navigation, Oconto Harbor, Wisconsin, authorized by the 
                Act of August 2, 1882 (22 Stat. 196), and the Act of 
                June 25, 1910 (36 Stat. 664) (commonly known as the 
                ``River and Harbor Act of 1910''), consisting of a 15-
                foot-deep turning basin in the Oconto River, as 
                described in subparagraph (B).
                    (B) Project description.--The project referred to in 
                subparagraph (B) is more particularly described as--
                          (i) beginning at a point along the western 
                      limit of the existing project, N394,086.71, 
                      E2,530,202.71;
                          (ii) thence northeasterly about 619.93 feet to 
                      a point N394,459.10, E2,530,698.33;
                          (iii) thence southeasterly about 186.06 feet 
                      to a point N394,299.20, E2,530,793.47;
                          (iv) thence southwesterly about 355.07 feet to 
                      a point N393,967.13, E2,530,667.76;
                          (v) thence southwesterly about 304.10 feet to 
                      a point N393,826.90, E2,530,397.92; and
                          (vi) thence northwesterly about 324.97 feet to 
                      the point of origin.

    (b) Anchorage Area, New London Harbor, Connecticut.--The portion of 
the project for navigation, New London Harbor, Connecticut, authorized 
by the River and Harbor Appropriations Act of June 13, 1902 (32 Stat. 
333), that consists of a 23-foot waterfront channel and that is further 
described as beginning at a point along the western limit of the 
existing project, N188, 802.75, E779, 462.81, thence running 
northeasterly about 1,373.88 feet to a point N189, 554.87, E780, 612.53, 
thence running southeasterly about 439.54 feet to a point N189, 319.88, 
E780, 983.98, thence running southwesterly about 831.58 feet to a point 
N188, 864.63, E780, 288.08, thence running southeasterly about 567.39 
feet to a point N188, 301.88, E780, 360.49, thence running northwesterly 
about 1,027.96 feet to the point of origin, is redesignated as an 
anchorage area.

[[Page 121 STAT. 1162]]

    (c) Southport Harbor, Fairfield, Connecticut.--The project for 
navigation, Southport Harbor, Fairfield, Connecticut, authorized by 
section 2 of the River and Harbor Act of March 2, 1829, and by the first 
section of the River and Harbor Act of August 30, 1935 (49 Stat. 1029), 
and section 364 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 
Stat. 3733-3734), is modified to redesignate a portion of the 9-foot-
deep channel to an anchorage area, approximately 900 feet in length and 
90,000 square feet in area, and lying generally north of a line with 
points at coordinates N108,043.45, E452,252.04 and N107,938.74, 
E452,265.74.
    (d) Saco River, Maine.--The portion of the project for navigation, 
Saco River, Maine, constructed under section 107 of the River and Harbor 
Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 577) and described as a 6-foot deep, 10-acre 
maneuvering basin located at the head of navigation, is redesignated as 
an anchorage area.
    (e) Union River, Maine.--The project for navigation, Union River, 
Maine, authorized by the first section of the Act of June 3, 1896 (29 
Stat. 215), is modified by redesignating as an anchorage area that 
portion of the project consisting of a 6-foot turning basin and lying 
northerly of a line commencing at a point N315,975.13, E1,004,424.86, 
thence running north 61 degrees 27 minutes 20.71 seconds west about 
132.34 feet to a point N316,038.37, E1,004,308.61.
    (f) Mystic River, Massachusetts.--The portion of the project for 
navigation, Mystic River, Massachusetts, authorized by the first section 
of the River and Harbor Appropriations Act of July 13, 1892 (27 Stat. 
96), between a line starting at a point N515,683.77, E707,035.45 and 
ending at a point N515,721.28, E707,069.85 and a line starting at a 
point N514,595.15, E707,746.15 and ending at a point N514,732.94, 
E707,658.38 shall be relocated and reduced from a 100-foot wide channel 
to a 50-foot wide channel after the date of enactment of this Act 
described as follows: Beginning at a point N515,721.28, E707,069.85, 
thence running southeasterly about 840.50 feet to a point N515,070.16, 
E707,601.27, thence running southeasterly about 177.54 feet to a point 
N514,904.84, E707,665.98, thence running southeasterly about 319.90 feet 
to a point with coordinates N514,595.15, E707,746.15, thence running 
northwesterly about 163.37 feet to a point N514,732.94, E707,658.38, 
thence running northwesterly about 161.58 feet to a point N514.889.47, 
E707,618.30, thence running northwesterly about 166.61 feet to a point 
N515.044.62, E707,557.58, thence running northwesterly about 825.31 feet 
to a point N515,683.77, E707,035.45, thence running northeasterly about 
50.90 feet returning to a point N515,721.28, E707,069.85.
    (g) Rivercenter, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.--Section 38(c) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1988 (33 U.S.C. 59j-1; 102 Stat. 
4038) is amended by striking ``subsection (a) of this section'' and 
inserting ``subsection (a) (except 30 years from such date of enactment, 
in the case of the area or any part thereof described in subsection 
(a)(5))''.
    (h) Additional Deauthorizations.--The following projects are not 
authorized after the date of enactment of this Act, except with respect 
to any portion of such a project which portion has been completed before 
such date or is under construction on such date:

[[Page 121 STAT. 1163]]

            (1) The project for flood protection on Atascadero Creek and 
        its tributaries of Goleta, California, authorized by section 201 
        of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (84 Stat. 1826).
            (2) The project for the construction of bridge fenders for 
        the Summit and St. Georges Bridge for the Inland Waterway of the 
        Delaware River to the C & D Canal of the Chesapeake Bay, 
        Delaware and Maryland, authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 
        1954 (68 Stat. 1249).
            (3) The project for flood control, central and southern 
        Florida, Shingle Creek basin, Florida, authorized by section 203 
        of the Flood Control Act of 1962 (76 Stat. 1182).
            (4) The project for flood control, Brevoort, Indiana, 
        authorized by section 5 of the Flood Control Act of June 22, 
        1936 (49 Stat. 1587).
            (5) The project for flood control, Middle Wabash, Greenfield 
        Bayou, Indiana, authorized by section 10 of the Flood Control 
        Act of July 24, 1946 (60 Stat. 649).
            (6) The project for flood damage reduction, Lake George, 
        Hobart, Indiana, authorized by section 602(a)(2) of the Water 
        Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4148).
            (7) The project for navigation at the Muscatine Harbor on 
        the Mississippi River at Muscatine, Iowa, authorized by section 
        101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1950 (64 Stat. 166).
            (8) The project for flood control and water supply, Eagle 
        Creek Lake, Kentucky, authorized by section 203 of the Flood 
        Control Act of 1962 (76 Stat. 1188).
            (9) The project for flood control, Hazard, Kentucky, 
        authorized by section 3(a)(7) of the Water Resources Development 
        Act of 1988 (100 Stat. 4014) and section 108 of the Water 
        Resources Development Act of 1990 (104 Stat. 4621).
            (10) The project for flood control, western Kentucky 
        tributaries, Kentucky, authorized by section 204 of the Flood 
        Control Act of 1965 (79 Stat. 1076) and modified by section 210 
        of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (84 Stat. 1829).
            (11) The project for flood damage reduction, Tensas-Cocodrie 
        area, Louisiana, authorized by section 3 of the Flood Control 
        Act of August 18, 1941 (55 Stat. 643).
            (12) The uncompleted portions of the project for navigation 
        improvement for Bayou LaFourche and LaFourche Jump, Louisiana, 
        authorized by the Act of August 30, 1935 (49 Stat. 1033), and 
        the River and Harbor Act of 1960 (74 Stat. 481).
            (13) The project for flood control, Eastern Rapides and 
        South-Central Avoyelles Parishes, Louisiana, authorized by 
        section 201 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (84 Stat. 1825).
            (14) The project for erosion protection and recreation, Fort 
        Livingston, Grande Terre Island, Louisiana, authorized by the 
        Act of August 13, 1946 (33 U.S.C. 426e et seq.).
            (15) The project for navigation, Northeast Harbor, Maine, 
        authorized by section 2 of the Act of March 2, 1945 (59 Stat. 
        12).
            (16) The project for navigation, Tenants Harbor, Maine, 
        authorized by the first section of the Act of March 2, 1919 (40 
        Stat. 1275).
            (17) The project for navigation, New York Harbor and 
        adjacent channels, Claremont Terminal, Jersey City, New

[[Page 121 STAT. 1164]]

        Jersey, authorized by section 202(b) of the Water Resources 
        Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4098).
            (18) The project for navigation, Olcott Harbor, Lake 
        Ontario, New York, authorized by section 601(a) of the Water 
        Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4143).
            (19) The project for navigation, Outer Harbor, Buffalo, New 
        York, authorized by section 110 of the Water Resources 
        Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4817).
            (20) The project for the Columbia River, Seafarers Memorial, 
        Hammond, Oregon, authorized by title I of the Energy and Water 
        Development Appropriations Act, 1991 (104 Stat. 2078).
            (21) The project for navigation, Narragansett Town Beach, 
        Narragansett, Rhode Island, authorized by section 361 of the 
        Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4861).
            (22) The project for bulkhead repairs, Quonset Point-
        Davisville, Rhode Island, authorized by section 571 of the Water 
        Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3788).
            (23) The structural portion of the project for flood 
        control, Cypress Creek, Texas, authorized by section 3(a)(13) of 
        the Water Resources Development Act of 1988 (102 Stat. 4014).
            (24) The project for flood protection, East Fork Channel 
        Improvement, Increment 2, East Fork of the Trinity River, Texas, 
        authorized by section 203 of the Flood Control Act of 1962 (76 
        Stat. 1185).
            (25) The project for flood control, Falfurrias, Texas, 
        authorized by section 3(a)(14) of the Water Resources 
        Development Act of 1988 (102 Stat. 4014).
            (26) The project for flood control, Pecan Bayou Lake, Texas, 
        authorized by section 203 of the Flood Control Act of 1968 (82 
        Stat. 742).
            (27) The project for navigation improvements affecting Lake 
        of the Pines, Texas, for the portion of the Red River below 
        Fulton, Arkansas, authorized by the Act of July 13, 1892 (27 
        Stat. 103) and modified by the Act of July 24, 1946 (60 Stat. 
        635), the Act of May 17, 1950 (64 Stat. 163), and the River and 
        Harbor Act of 1968 (82 Stat. 731).
            (28) The project for navigation, Tennessee Colony Lake, 
        Trinity River, Texas, authorized by section 204 of the River and 
        Harbor Act of 1965 (79 Stat. 1091).
            (29) The project for streambank erosion, Kanawha River, 
        Charleston, West Virginia, authorized by section 603(f)(13) of 
        the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4153).
SEC. 3182. LAND CONVEYANCES.

    (a) St. Francis Basin, Arkansas and Missouri.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary shall convey to the State of 
        Arkansas, without monetary consideration and subject to 
        paragraph (2), all right, title, and interest in and to real 
        property within the State acquired by the Federal Government as 
        mitigation land for the project for flood control, St. Francis 
        Basin, Arkansas and Missouri Project, authorized by the Flood 
        Control Act of May 15, 1928 (33 U.S.C. 702a et seq.).
            (2) Terms and conditions.--
                    (A) In general.--The conveyance by the United States 
                under this subsection shall be subject to--

[[Page 121 STAT. 1165]]

                          (i) the condition that the State of Arkansas 
                      agree to operate, maintain, and manage the real 
                      property for fish and wildlife, recreation, and 
                      environmental purposes at no cost or expense to 
                      the United States; and
                          (ii) such other terms and conditions as the 
                      Secretary determines to be in the interest of the 
                      United States.
                    (B) Reversion.--If the Secretary determines that the 
                real property conveyed under paragraph (1) ceases to be 
                held in public ownership or the State ceases to operate, 
                maintain, and manage the real property in accordance 
                with this subsection, all right, title, and interest in 
                and to the property shall revert to the United States, 
                at the option of the Secretary.
            (3) Mitigation.--Nothing in this subsection extinguishes the 
        responsibility of the Federal Government or the non-Federal 
        interest for the project referred to in paragraph (1) from the 
        obligation to implement mitigation for such project that existed 
        on the day prior to the transfer authorized by this subsection.

    (b) Oakland Inner Harbor Tidal Canal, California.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary may convey, by separate 
        quitclaim deeds, as soon as the conveyance of each individual 
        portion is practicable, the title of the United States in and to 
        all or portions of the approximately 86 acres of upland, 
        tideland, and submerged land, commonly referred to as the 
        ``Oakland Inner Harbor Tidal Canal'', California (referred to in 
        this section as the ``Canal Property''), as follows:
                    (A) To the city of Oakland, without consideration, 
                the title of the United States in and to all or portions 
                of that part of the Canal Property that are located 
                within the boundaries of the City of Oakland.
                    (B) To the city of Alameda, or to a public entity 
                created by or designated by the city of Alameda that is 
                eligible to hold title to real property, without 
                consideration, the title of the United States in and to 
                all or portions of that part of the Canal Property that 
                are located within the boundaries of the city of 
                Alameda.
                    (C) To the owners of lands adjacent to the Canal 
                Property, or to a public entity created by or designated 
                by one or more of the adjacent land owners that are 
                eligible to hold title to real property, at fair market 
                value, the title of the United States in and to all or 
                portions of that part of the Canal Property that are 
                located within the boundaries of the city in which the 
                adjacent land is located.
            (2) Requirement.--The Secretary may reserve and retain from 
        any conveyance under this subsection a right-of-way or other 
        rights as the Secretary determines to be necessary for the 
        operation and maintenance of the authorized Federal channel in 
        the Canal Property.
            (3) Annual reports.--Until the date on which each conveyance 
        described in paragraph (1) is complete, the Secretary shall 
        submit, by not later than November 30 of each year, to the 
        Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate and 
        Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of 
        Representatives an annual report that

[[Page 121 STAT. 1166]]

        describes the efforts of the Secretary to complete that 
        conveyance during the preceding fiscal year.
            (4) Form.--A conveyance made under this subsection may be, 
        in whole or in part, in the form of an easement.
            (5) Right of first refusal.--For any property on which an 
        easement is granted under this subsection, should the Secretary 
        seek to dispose of the property, the holder of the easement 
        shall have the right of first refusal to the property without 
        cost or consideration.
            (6) Repeal.--Section 205 of the Water Resources Development 
        Act of 1990 (104 Stat. 4633; 110 Stat. 3748) is repealed.

    (c) Milford, Kansas.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary shall convey by quitclaim 
        deed without consideration to the Geary County Fire Department, 
        Milford, Kansas, all right, title, and interest of the United 
        States in and to real property consisting of approximately 7.4 
        acres located in Geary County, Kansas, for construction, 
        operation, and maintenance of a fire station.
            (2) Reversion.--If the Secretary determines that the real 
        property conveyed under paragraph (1) ceases to be held in 
        public ownership or ceases to be operated and maintained as a 
        fire station, all right, title, and interest in and to the 
        property shall revert to the United States, at the option of the 
        United States.

    (d) Strawn Cemetery, John Redmond Lake, Kansas.--
            (1) In general.--As soon as practicable after the date of 
        enactment of this Act, the Secretary, acting through the Tulsa 
        District of the Corps of Engineers, shall transfer to Pleasant 
        Township, Coffey County, Kansas, for use as the New Strawn 
        Cemetery, all right, title, and interest of the United States in 
        and to the land described in paragraph (3).
            (2) Reversion.--If the land transferred under this 
        subsection ceases at any time to be used as a nonprofit cemetery 
        or for another public purpose, the land shall revert to the 
        United States.
            (3) Description.--The land to be conveyed under this 
        subsection is a tract of land near John Redmond Lake, Kansas, 
        containing approximately 3 acres and lying adjacent to the west 
        line of the Strawn Cemetery located in the SE corner of the 
        NE\1/4\ of section 32, township 20 south, range 14 east, Coffey 
        County, Kansas.

    (e) Pike County, Missouri.--
            (1) Definitions.--In this subsection, the following 
        definitions apply:
                    (A) Federal land.--The term ``Federal land'' means 
                the 2 parcels of Corps of Engineers land totaling 
                approximately 42 acres, located on Buffalo Island in 
                Pike County, Missouri, and consisting of Government 
                Tract Numbers MIS-7 and a portion of FM-46.
                    (B) Non-federal land.--The term ``non-Federal land'' 
                means the approximately 42 acres of land, subject to any 
                existing flowage easements situated in Pike County, 
                Missouri, upstream and northwest, about 200 feet from 
                Drake Island (also known as Grimes Island).
            (2) Land exchange.--Subject to paragraph (3), on conveyance 
        by S.S.S., Inc., to the United States of all right, title, and 
        interest in and to the non-Federal land, the Secretary

[[Page 121 STAT. 1167]]

        shall convey to S.S.S., Inc., all right, title, and interest of 
        the United States in and to the Federal land.
            (3) Conditions.--
                    (A) Deeds.--
                          (i) Non-federal land.--The conveyance of the 
                      non-Federal land to the Secretary shall be by a 
                      warranty deed acceptable to the Secretary.
                          (ii) Federal land.--The conveyance of the 
                      Federal land to S.S.S., Inc., shall be--
                                    (I) by quitclaim deed; and
                                    (II) subject to any reservations, 
                                terms, and conditions that the Secretary 
                                determines to be necessary to allow the 
                                United States to operate and maintain 
                                the Mississippi River 9-Foot Navigation 
                                Project.
                          (iii) Legal descriptions.--The Secretary shall 
                      provide a legal description of the Federal land, 
                      and S.S.S., Inc., shall provide a legal 
                      description of the non-Federal land, for inclusion 
                      in the deeds referred to in clauses (i) and (ii).
                    (B) Removal of improvements.--
                          (i) In general.--The Secretary may require the 
                      removal of, or S.S.S., Inc., may voluntarily 
                      remove, any improvements to the non-Federal land 
                      before the completion of the exchange or as a 
                      condition of the exchange.
                          (ii) No liability.--If S.S.S., Inc., removes 
                      any improvements to the non-Federal land under 
                      clause (i)--
                                    (I) S.S.S., Inc., shall have no 
                                claim against the United States relating 
                                to the removal; and
                                    (II) the United States shall not 
                                incur or be liable for any cost 
                                associated with the removal or 
                                relocation of the improvements.
                    (C) Administrative costs.--The Secretary shall 
                require S.S.S., Inc. to pay reasonable administrative 
                costs associated with the exchange.
                    (D) Cash equalization payment.--If the appraised 
                fair market value, as determined by the Secretary, of 
                the Federal land exceeds the appraised fair market 
                value, as determined by the Secretary, of the non-
                Federal land, S.S.S., Inc., shall make a cash 
                equalization payment to the United States.
                    (E) Deadline.--The land exchange under subparagraph 
                (B) shall be completed not later than 2 years after the 
                date of enactment of this Act.

    (f) Union Lake, Missouri.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary shall offer to convey to the 
        State of Missouri, before June 30, 2007, all right, title, and 
        interest in and to approximately 205.50 acres of land described 
        in paragraph (2) purchased for the Union Lake Project that was 
        deauthorized as of January 1, 1990 (55 Fed. Reg. 40906), in 
        accordance with section 1001(a) of the Water Resources 
        Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 579a(a)).
            (2) Land description.--The land referred to in paragraph (1) 
        is described as follows:

[[Page 121 STAT. 1168]]

                    (A) Tract 500.--A tract of land situated in Franklin 
                County, Missouri, being part of the SW\1/4\ of section 
                7, and the NW\1/4\ of the SW\1/4\ of section 8, township 
                42 north, range 2 west of the fifth principal meridian, 
                consisting of approximately 112.50 acres.
                    (B) Tract 605.--A tract of land situated in Franklin 
                County, Missouri, being part of the N\1/2\ of the NE, 
                and part of the SE of the NE of section 18, township 42 
                north, range 2 west of the fifth principal meridian, 
                consisting of approximately 93.00 acres.
            (3) Conveyance.--On acceptance by the State of Missouri of 
        the offer by the Secretary under paragraph (1), the land 
        described in paragraph (2) shall immediately be conveyed, in its 
        current condition, by Secretary to the State of Missouri.

    (g) Boardman, Oregon.--Section 501(g)(1) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3751) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``city of Boardman,'' and inserting ``the 
        Boardman Park and Recreation District, Boardman,''; and
            (2) by striking ``such city'' and inserting ``the city of 
        Boardman''.

    (h) Lookout Point Project, Lowell, Oregon.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary may convey without 
        consideration to Lowell School District, by quitclaim deed, all 
        right, title, and interest of the United States in and to land 
        and buildings thereon, known as Tract A-82, located in Lowell, 
        Oregon, and described in paragraph (2).
            (2) Description of property.--The parcel of land authorized 
        to be conveyed under paragraph (1) is as follows: Commencing at 
        the point of intersection of the west line of Pioneer Street 
        with the westerly extension of the north line of Summit Street, 
        in Meadows Addition to Lowell, as platted and recorded at page 
        56 of Volume 4, Lane County Oregon Plat Records; thence north on 
        the west line of Pioneer Street a distance of 176.0 feet to the 
        true point of beginning of this description; thence north on the 
        west line of Pioneer Street a distance of 170.0 feet; thence 
        west at right angles to the west line of Pioneer Street a 
        distance of 250.0 feet; thence south and parallel to the west 
        line of Pioneer Street a distance of 170.0 feet; thence east 
        250.0 feet to the true point of beginning of this description in 
        Section 14, Township 19 South, Range 1 West of the Willamette 
        Meridian, Lane County, Oregon.
            (3) Terms and conditions.--Before conveying the parcel to 
        the school district, the Secretary shall ensure that the 
        conditions of buildings and facilities meet the requirements of 
        applicable Federal law.
            (4) Reversion.--If the Secretary determines that the 
        property conveyed under paragraph (1) ceases to be held in 
        public ownership, all right, title, and interest in and to the 
        property shall revert to the United States, at the option of the 
        United States.

    (i) Richard B. Russell Lake, South Carolina.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary shall convey, at fair market 
        value, to the State of South Carolina, by quitclaim deed, all 
        right, title, and interest of the United States in and to the 
        parcels of land described in paragraph (2)(A) that are managed, 
        as of the date of enactment of this Act, by the South Carolina 
        department of commerce for public recreation purposes for the

[[Page 121 STAT. 1169]]

        Richard B. Russell Dam and Lake, South Carolina, project 
        authorized by section 203 of the Flood Control Act of 1966 (80 
        Stat. 1420).
            (2) Land description.--
                    (A) In general.--Subject to subparagraphs (B) and 
                (C), the parcels of land referred to in paragraph (1) 
                are the parcels contained in the portion of land 
                described in Army Lease Number DACW21-1-92-0500.
                    (B) Retention of interests.--The United States shall 
                retain--
                          (i) ownership of all land included in the 
                      lease referred to in subparagraph (A) that would 
                      have been acquired for operational purposes in 
                      accordance with the 1971 implementation of the 
                      1962 Army/Interior Joint Acquisition Policy; and
                          (ii) such other land as is determined by the 
                      Secretary to be required for authorized project 
                      purposes, including easement rights-of-way to 
                      remaining Federal land.
                    (C) Survey.--The cost of the survey shall be paid by 
                the State.
            (3) Costs of conveyance.--
                    (A) In general.--The State shall be responsible for 
                all costs, including real estate transaction and 
                environmental costs, associated with the conveyance 
                under this subsection.
                    (B) Form of contribution.--As determined appropriate 
                by the Secretary, in lieu of payment of compensation to 
                the United States under subparagraph (A), the State may 
                perform certain environmental or real estate actions 
                associated with the conveyance under this subsection if 
                those actions are performed in close coordination with, 
                to the satisfaction of, and in compliance with the laws 
                of the United States.
            (4) Additional terms and conditions.--
                    (A) No effect on shore management policy.--The 
                Shoreline Management Policy (ER-1130-2-406) of the Corps 
                of Engineers may not be changed or altered for any 
                proposed development of land conveyed under this 
                subsection.
                    (B) Cost sharing.--In carrying out the conveyance 
                under this subsection, the Secretary and the State shall 
                comply with all obligations of any cost sharing 
                agreement between the Secretary and the State in effect 
                as of the date of the conveyance.
                    (C) Land not conveyed.--The State shall continue to 
                manage the land that is subject to Army Lease Number 
                DACW21-1-92-0500 and that is not conveyed under this 
                subsection in accordance with the terms and conditions 
                of Army Lease Number DACW21-1-92-0500.

    (j) Denison, Texas.--
            (1) <<NOTE: Deadline.>> In general.--Not later than 90 days 
        after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall 
        offer to convey at fair market value to the city of Denison, 
        Texas, all right, title, and interest of the United States in 
        and to the approximately 900 acres of land located in Grayson 
        County, Texas, which is currently subject to an application for 
        lease for public

[[Page 121 STAT. 1170]]

        park and recreational purposes made by the city of Denison, 
        dated August 17, 2005.
            (2) Survey to obtain legal description.--The exact acreage 
        and description of the real property referred to in paragraph 
        (1) shall be determined by a survey paid for by the city of 
        Denison, Texas, that is satisfactory to the Secretary.
            (3) <<NOTE: Deadline.>> Conveyance.--Not later than 90 days 
        after the date of acceptance by the city of Denison, Texas, of 
        an offer under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall convey the 
        land surveyed under paragraph (2) by quitclaim deed to the city 
        of Denison, Texas.

    (k) Generally Applicable Provisions.--
            (1) Survey to obtain legal description.--The exact acreage 
        and the legal description of any real property to be conveyed 
        under this section shall be determined by a survey that is 
        satisfactory to the Secretary.
            (2) Applicability of property screening provisions.--Section 
        2696 of title 10, United States Code, shall not apply to any 
        conveyance under this section.
            (3) Additional terms and conditions.--The Secretary may 
        require that any conveyance under this section be subject to 
        such additional terms and conditions as the Secretary considers 
        appropriate and necessary to protect the interests of the United 
        States.
            (4) Costs of conveyance.--An entity to which a conveyance is 
        made under this section shall be responsible for all reasonable 
        and necessary costs, including real estate transaction and 
        environmental documentation costs, associated with the 
        conveyance.
            (5) Liability.--An entity to which a conveyance is made 
        under this section shall hold the United States harmless from 
        any liability with respect to activities carried out, on or 
        after the date of the conveyance, on the real property conveyed. 
        The United States shall remain responsible for any liability 
        with respect to activities carried out, before such date, on the 
        real property conveyed.
SEC. 3183. EXTINGUISHMENT OF REVERSIONARY INTERESTS AND USE 
                          RESTRICTIONS.

    (a) Idaho.--
            (1) In general.--With respect to the property covered by 
        each deed in paragraph (2)--
                    (A) the reversionary interests and use restrictions 
                relating to port and industrial use purposes are 
                extinguished;
                    (B) the restriction that no activity shall be 
                permitted that will compete with services and facilities 
                offered by public marinas is extinguished; and
                    (C) the human habitation or other building structure 
                use restriction is extinguished if the elevation of the 
                property is above the standard project flood elevation.
            (2) Affected deeds.--The deeds with the following county 
        auditor's file numbers are referred to in paragraph (1):
                    (A) Auditor's Instrument No. 399218 of Nez Perce 
                County, Idaho--2.07 acres.
                    (B) Auditor's Instrument No. 487437 of Nez Perce 
                County, Idaho--7.32 acres.

[[Page 121 STAT. 1171]]

    (b) Lake Texoma, Oklahoma.--
            (1) <<NOTE: Termination date.>> Release.--Any reversionary 
        interest relating to public parks and recreation on the land 
        conveyed by the Secretary to the State of Oklahoma at Lake 
        Texoma pursuant to the Act entitled ``An Act to authorize the 
        sale of certain lands to the State of Oklahoma'' (67 Stat. 63), 
        shall terminate on the date of enactment of this Act.
            (2) Instrument of release.--As soon as practicable after the 
        date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall execute and 
        file in the appropriate office a deed of release, an amended 
        deed, or any other appropriate instrument to release each 
        reversionary interest to which paragraph (1) applies.
            (3) Preservation of reserved rights.--A release of a 
        reversionary interest under this subsection shall not affect any 
        other right of the United States in any deed of conveyance 
        pursuant to the Act referred to in paragraph (1).

    (c) Lowell, Oregon.--
            (1) Release and extinguishment of deed reservations.--
                    (A) Release and extinguishment of deed 
                reservations.--The Secretary may release and extinguish 
                the deed reservations for access and communication 
                cables contained in the quitclaim deed, dated January 
                26, 1965, and recorded February 15, 1965, in the records 
                of Lane County, Oregon; except that such reservations 
                may only be released and extinguished for the lands 
                owned by the city of Lowell as described in the 
                quitclaim deed, dated April 11, 1991, in such records.
                    (B) Additional release and extinguishment of deed 
                reservations.--The Secretary may also release and 
                extinguish the same deed reservations referred to in 
                subparagraph (A) over land owned by Lane County, Oregon, 
                within the city limits of Lowell, Oregon, to accommodate 
                the development proposals of the city of Lowell/St. 
                Vincent de Paul, Lane County, affordable housing 
                project; except that the Secretary may require, at no 
                cost to the United States--
                          (i) the alteration or relocation of any 
                      existing facilities, utilities, roads, or similar 
                      improvements on such lands; and
                          (ii) the right-of-way for such facilities, 
                      utilities, roads, or improvements as a 
                      precondition of any release or extinguishment of 
                      the deed reservations.
            (2) Conveyance.--The Secretary may convey to the city of 
        Lowell, Oregon, the parcel of land situated in the city of 
        Lowell, Oregon, at fair market value consisting of the strip of 
        federally owned lands located northeast of West Boundary Road 
        between Hyland Lane and the city of Lowell's eastward city 
        limits.
            (3) Administrative cost.--Notwithstanding paragraphs (1) and 
        (2), the city of Lowell, Oregon, shall pay the administrative 
        costs incurred by the United States to execute the release and 
        extinguishment of the deed reservations under paragraph (1) and 
        the conveyance under paragraph (2).

    (d) Old Hickory Lock and Dam, Cumberland River, Tennessee.--

[[Page 121 STAT. 1172]]

            (1) Release of retained rights, interests, reservations.--
        With respect to land conveyed by the Secretary to the Tennessee 
        Society of Crippled Children and Adults, Incorporated (commonly 
        known as ``Easter Seals Tennessee'') at Old Hickory Lock and 
        Dam, Cumberland River, Tennessee, under section 211 of the Flood 
        Control Act of 1965 (79 Stat. 1087), the reversionary interests 
        and the use restrictions relating to recreation and camping 
        purposes are extinguished.
            (2) Instrument of release.--As soon as practicable after the 
        date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall execute and 
        file in the appropriate office a deed of release, amended deed, 
        or other appropriate instrument effectuating the release of 
        interests required by paragraph (1).

    (e) Lower Granite Pool, Washington.--
            (1) Extinguishment of reversionary interests and use 
        restrictions.--With respect to property covered by each deed 
        described in paragraph (2)--
                    (A) the reversionary interests and use restrictions 
                relating to port or industrial purposes are 
                extinguished; and
                    (B) the human habitation or other building structure 
                use restriction is extinguished in each area in which 
                the elevation is above the standard project flood 
                elevation.
            (2) Deeds.--The deeds referred to in paragraph (1) are as 
        follows:
                    (A) Auditor's File Numbers 432576, 443411, 499988, 
                and 579771 of Whitman County, Washington.
                    (B) Auditor's File Numbers 125806, 138801, 147888, 
                154511, 156928, and 176360 of Asotin County, Washington.

    (f) Port of Pasco, Washington.--
            (1) Extinguishment of use restrictions and flowage 
        easement.--With respect to the property covered by the deed in 
        paragraph (3)(A)--
                    (A) the flowage easement and human habitation or 
                other building structure use restriction is extinguished 
                if the elevation of the property is above the standard 
                project flood elevation; and
                    (B) the use of fill material to raise areas of the 
                property above the standard project flood elevation is 
                authorized, except in any area for which a permit under 
                section 404 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act 
                (33 U.S.C. 1344) is required.
            (2) Extinguishment of flowage easement.--With respect to the 
        property covered by each deed in paragraph (3)(B), the flowage 
        easement is extinguished if the elevation of the property is 
        above the standard project flood elevation.
            (3) Affected deeds.--The deeds referred to in paragraphs (1) 
        and (2) are as follows:
                    (A) Auditor's File Number 262980 of Franklin County, 
                Washington.
                    (B) Auditor's File Numbers 263334 and 404398 of 
                Franklin County, Washington.

    (g) No Effect on Other Rights.--Nothing in this section affects the 
remaining rights and interests of the Corps of Engineers for authorized 
project purposes.

[[Page 121 STAT. 1173]]

                            TITLE IV--STUDIES

SEC. 4001. JOHN GLENN GREAT LAKES BASIN PROGRAM.

    Section 455 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (42 
U.S.C. 1962d-21) is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(g) In-Kind Contributions for Study.--The non-Federal interest may 
provide up to 100 percent of the non-Federal share required under 
subsection (f) in the form of in-kind services and materials.''.
SEC. 4002. LAKE ERIE DREDGED MATERIAL DISPOSAL SITES.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the nature and 
frequency of avian botulism problems in the vicinity of Lake Erie 
associated with dredged material disposal sites and shall make 
recommendations to eliminate the conditions that result in such 
problems.
SEC. 4003. SOUTHWESTERN UNITED STATES DROUGHT STUDY.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary, in coordination with the Secretary 
of the Interior, the Secretary of Agriculture, the Secretary of 
Commerce, and other appropriate agencies, shall conduct, at Federal 
expense, a comprehensive study of drought conditions in the southwestern 
United States, with particular emphasis on the Colorado River basin, the 
Rio Grande River basin, and the Great Basin.
    (b) Inventory of Actions.--In conducting the study, the Secretary 
shall assemble an inventory of actions taken or planned to be taken to 
address drought-related situations in the southwestern United States.
    (c) Purpose.--The purpose of the study shall be to develop 
recommendations to more effectively address current and future drought 
conditions in the southwestern United States.
    (d) Authorization of Appropriations.--There are authorized to be 
appropriated to the Secretary to carry out this section $7,000,000. Such 
funds shall remain available until expended.
SEC. 4004. DELAWARE RIVER.

    The <<NOTE: Review.>> Secretary shall review, in consultation with 
the Delaware River Basin Commission and the States of Delaware, 
Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, the report of the Chief of 
Engineers on the Delaware River, published as House Document Numbered 
522, 87th Congress, Second Session, as it relates to the Mid-Delaware 
River Basin from Wilmington to Port Jervis, and any other pertinent 
reports (including the strategy for resolution of interstate flow 
management issues in the Delaware River Basin dated August 2004 and the 
National Park Service Lower Delaware River Management Plan (1997-1999)), 
with a view to determining whether any modifications of recommendations 
contained in the first report referred to are advisable at the present 
time, in the interest of flood damage reduction, ecosystem restoration, 
and other related problems.
SEC. 4005. EURASIAN MILFOIL.

    Under the authority of section 104 of the River and Harbor Act of 
1958 (33 U.S.C. 610), the Secretary shall conduct a study, at Federal 
expense, to develop national protocols for the use of

[[Page 121 STAT. 1174]]

the Euhrychiopsis lecontei weevil for biological control of Eurasian 
milfoil in the lakes of Vermont and other northeastern States.
SEC. 4006. FIRE ISLAND, ALASKA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for navigational improvements, including a barge 
landing facility, Fire Island, Alaska.
SEC. 4007. KNIK ARM, COOK INLET, ALASKA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the potential 
impacts on navigation of construction of a bridge across Knik Arm, Cook 
Inlet, Alaska.
SEC. 4008. KUSKOKWIM RIVER, ALASKA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for navigation, Kuskokwim River, Alaska, in the 
vicinity of the village of Crooked Creek.
SEC. 4009. NOME HARBOR, ALASKA.

    The Secretary shall review the project for navigation, Nome Harbor 
improvements, Alaska, authorized by section 101(a)(1) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 273), to determine whether 
the project cost increases, including the cost of rebuilding the 
entrance channel damaged in a September 2005 storm, resulted from a 
design deficiency.
SEC. 4010. ST. GEORGE HARBOR, ALASKA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
providing navigation improvements at St. George Harbor, Alaska.
SEC. 4011. SUSITNA RIVER, ALASKA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for hydropower, recreation, and related purposes 
on the Susitna River, Alaska.
SEC. 4012. VALDEZ, ALASKA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for navigation, Valdez, Alaska, and if the 
Secretary determines that the project is feasible, shall carry out the 
project at a total cost of $20,000,000.
SEC. 4013. GILA BEND, MARICOPA, ARIZONA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine 
the feasibility of carrying out a project for flood damage reduction, 
Gila Bend, Maricopa, Arizona.
    (b) Review of Plans.--In conducting the study, the Secretary shall 
review plans and designs developed by non-Federal interests and shall 
incorporate such plans and designs into the Federal study if the 
Secretary determines that such plans and designs are consistent with 
Federal standards.
SEC. 4014. SEARCY COUNTY, ARKANSAS.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
using Greers Ferry Lake as a water supply source for Searcy County, 
Arkansas.
SEC. 4015. ALISO CREEK, CALIFORNIA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for streambank protection and environmental 
restoration along Aliso Creek, California.

[[Page 121 STAT. 1175]]

SEC. 4016. FRESNO, KINGS, AND KERN COUNTIES, CALIFORNIA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for water supply for Fresno, Kings, and Kern 
Counties, California.
SEC. 4017. FRUITVALE AVENUE RAILROAD BRIDGE, ALAMEDA, CALIFORNIA.

    (a) <<NOTE: Reports.>> In General.--The Secretary shall prepare a 
comprehensive report that examines the condition of the existing 
Fruitvale Avenue Railroad Bridge, Alameda County, California (referred 
to in this section as the ``Railroad Bridge''), and determines the most 
economic means to maintain that rail link by either repairing or 
replacing the Railroad Bridge.

    (b) Requirements.--The report under this section shall include--
            (1) a determination of whether the Railroad Bridge is in 
        immediate danger of failing or collapsing;
            (2) the annual costs to maintain the Railroad Bridge;
            (3) the costs to place the Railroad Bridge in a safe, ``no-
        collapse'' condition, such that the Railroad Bridge will not 
        endanger maritime traffic;
            (4) the costs to retrofit the Railroad Bridge such that the 
        Railroad Bridge may continue to serve as a rail link between the 
        Island of Alameda and the mainland; and
            (5) the costs to construct a replacement for the Railroad 
        Bridge capable of serving the current and future rail, light 
        rail, and homeland security needs of the region.

    (c) Submission of Report.--The Secretary shall--
            (1) complete the Railroad Bridge report under subsection (a) 
        not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act; 
        and
            (2) submit the report to the Committee on Environment and 
        Public Works of the Senate and Committee on Transportation and 
        Infrastructure of the House of Representatives.

    (d) Limitations.--The Secretary shall not--
            (1) demolish the Railroad Bridge or otherwise render the 
        Railroad Bridge unavailable or unusable for rail traffic; or
            (2) reduce maintenance of the Railroad Bridge.

    (e) Easement.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary shall provide to the city of 
        Alameda, California, a nonexclusive access easement over the 
        Oakland Estuary that comprises the subsurface land and surface 
        approaches for the Railroad Bridge that--
                    (A) is consistent with the Bay Trail Proposal of the 
                city of Oakland; and
                    (B) is otherwise suitable for the improvement, 
                operation, and maintenance of the Railroad Bridge or 
                construction, operation, and maintenance of a suitable 
                replacement bridge.
            (2) Cost.--The easement under paragraph (1) shall be 
        provided to the city of Alameda without consideration and at no 
        cost to the United States.
SEC. 4018. LOS ANGELES RIVER REVITALIZATION STUDY, CALIFORNIA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary, in coordination with the city of Los 
Angeles, shall--

[[Page 121 STAT. 1176]]

            (1) prepare a feasibility study for environmental ecosystem 
        restoration, flood control, recreation, and other aspects of Los 
        Angeles River revitalization that is consistent with the goals 
        of the Los Angeles River Revitalization Master Plan published by 
        the city of Los Angeles; and
            (2) consider any locally-preferred project alternatives 
        developed through a full and open evaluation process for 
        inclusion in the study.

    (b) Use of Existing Information and Measures.--In preparing the 
study under subsection (a), the Secretary shall use, to the maximum 
extent practicable--
            (1) information obtained from the Los Angeles River 
        Revitalization Master Plan; and
            (2) the development process of that plan.

    (c) Demonstration Projects.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary is authorized to construct 
        demonstration projects in order to provide information to 
        develop the study under subsection (a)(1).
            (2) Federal share.--The Federal share of the cost of any 
        project under this subsection shall be not more than 65 percent.
            (3) Authorization of appropriations.--There is authorized to 
        be appropriated to carry out this subsection $25,000,000.
SEC. 4019. LYTLE CREEK, RIALTO, CALIFORNIA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for flood damage reduction and groundwater 
recharge, Lytle Creek, Rialto, California.
SEC. 4020. MOKELUMNE RIVER, SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine 
the feasibility of carrying out a project for water supply along the 
Mokelumne River, San Joaquin County, California.
    (b) Limitation on Statutory Construction.--Nothing in this section 
shall be construed to invalidate, preempt, or create any exception to 
State water law, State water rights, or Federal or State permitted 
activities or agreements.
SEC. 4021. ORICK, CALIFORNIA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine 
the feasibility of carrying out a project for flood damage reduction and 
ecosystem restoration, Orick, California.
    (b) Feasibility of Restoring or Rehabilitating Redwook Creek 
Levees.--In conducting the study, the Secretary shall determine the 
feasibility of restoring or rehabilitating the Redwood Creek Levees, 
Humboldt County, California.
SEC. 4022. SHORELINE STUDY, OCEANSIDE, CALIFORNIA.

    Section 414 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 
Stat. 2636) is amended by striking ``32 months'' and inserting ``44 
months''.
SEC. 4023. RIALTO, FONTANA, AND COLTON, CALIFORNIA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for water supply for Rialto, Fontana, and Colton, 
California.
SEC. 4024. SACRAMENTO RIVER, CALIFORNIA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a comprehensive study to determine the 
feasibility of, and alternatives for, measures to protect

[[Page 121 STAT. 1177]]

water diversion facilities and fish protective screen facilities in the 
vicinity of river mile 178 on the Sacramento River, California.
SEC. 4025. SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for water supply, San Diego County, California, 
including a review of the feasibility of connecting 4 existing 
reservoirs to increase usable storage capacity.
SEC. 4026. SAN FRANCISCO BAY, SACRAMENTO-SAN JOAQUIN DELTA, 
                          CALIFORNIA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine 
the feasibility of the beneficial use of dredged material from the San 
Francisco Bay in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, California, including 
the benefits and impacts of salinity in the Delta and the benefits to 
navigation, flood damage reduction, ecosystem restoration, water 
quality, salinity control, water supply reliability, and recreation.
    (b) Cooperation.--In conducting the study, the Secretary shall 
cooperate with the California department of water resources and 
appropriate Federal and State entities in developing options for the 
beneficial use of dredged material from San Francisco Bay for the 
Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta area.
    (c) Review.--The study shall include a review of the feasibility of 
using Sherman Island as a rehandling site for levee maintenance 
material, as well as for ecosystem restoration. The review may include 
carrying out and monitoring a pilot project using up to 150,000 cubic 
yards of dredged material and being carried out at the Sherman Island 
site, examining larger scale use of dredged materials from the San 
Francisco Bay and Suisun Bay Channel, and analyzing the feasibility of 
the potential use of saline materials from the San Francisco Bay for 
both rehandling and ecosystem restoration purposes.
SEC. 4027. SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO BAY SHORELINE, CALIFORNIA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary, in cooperation with non-Federal 
interests, shall conduct a study of the feasibility of carrying out a 
project for--
            (1) flood damage reduction along the South San Francisco Bay 
        shoreline, California;
            (2) restoration of the South San Francisco Bay salt ponds 
        (including on land owned by other Federal agencies); and
            (3) other related purposes, as the Secretary determines to 
        be appropriate.

    (b) Report.--
            (1) In general.--Not later than 3 years after the date of 
        enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to Congress a 
        report describing the results of the study under subsection (a).
            (2) Inclusions.--The report under paragraph (1) shall 
        include recommendations of the Secretary with respect to the 
        project described in subsection (a) based on planning, design, 
        and land acquisition documents prepared by--
                    (A) the California State Coastal Conservancy;
                    (B) the Santa Clara Valley Water District; and
                    (C) other local interests.

    (c) Credit.--

[[Page 121 STAT. 1178]]

            (1) In general.--In accordance with section 221 of the Flood 
        Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), and subject to 
        paragraph (2), the Secretary shall credit toward the non-Federal 
        share of the cost of any project authorized by law as a result 
        of the South San Francisco Bay shoreline study--
                    (A) the cost of work performed by the non-Federal 
                interest in preparation of the feasibility study that is 
                conducted before the date of the feasibility cost 
                sharing agreement; and
                    (B) the funds expended by the non-Federal interest 
                for acquisition costs of land that constitutes a part of 
                such a project and that is owned by the United States 
                Fish and Wildlife Service.
            (2) Conditions.--The Secretary may provide credit under 
        paragraph (1) if--
                    (A) the value of all or any portion of land referred 
                to in paragraph (1)(B) that would be subject to the 
                credit has not previously been credited to the non-
                Federal interest for a project; and
                    (B) the land was not acquired to meet any mitigation 
                requirement of the non-Federal interest.
SEC. 4028. TWENTYNINE PALMS, CALIFORNIA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out projects for flood damage reduction in the vicinity of 
Twentynine Palms, California.
SEC. 4029. YUCCA VALLEY, CALIFORNIA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for flood damage reduction, Burnt Mountain basin, 
in the vicinity of Yucca Valley, California.
SEC. 4030. SELENIUM STUDIES, COLORADO.

    (a) In General.--The Director of the United States Geological 
Survey, in consultation with State water quality and resource and 
conservation agencies, shall conduct regional and watershed-wide studies 
to address selenium concentrations in the State of Colorado, including 
studies--
            (1) to measure selenium on specific sites; and
            (2) to determine whether specific selenium measures studied 
        should be recommended for use in demonstration projects.

    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $5,000,000.
SEC. 4031. DELAWARE AND CHRISTINA RIVERS AND SHELLPOT CREEK, 
                          WILMINGTON, DELAWARE.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for flood damage reduction and related purposes 
along the Delaware and Christina Rivers and Shellpot Creek, Wilmington, 
Delaware.
SEC. 4032. DELAWARE INLAND BAYS AND TRIBUTARIES AND ATLANTIC 
                          COAST, DELAWARE.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine 
the feasibility of modifying the project for navigation, Indian River 
Inlet and Bay, Delaware.

[[Page 121 STAT. 1179]]

    (b) Factors for Consideration and Priority.--In carrying out the 
study under subsection (a), the Secretary shall--
            (1) take into consideration all necessary activities to 
        stabilize the scour holes threatening the Inlet and Bay 
        shorelines; and
            (2) give priority to stabilizing and restoring the Inlet 
        channel and scour holes adjacent to the United States Coast 
        Guard pier and helipad and the adjacent State-owned properties.
SEC. 4033. COLLIER COUNTY BEACHES, FLORIDA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for hurricane and storm damage reduction and 
flood damage reduction in the vicinity of Vanderbilt, Park Shore, and 
Naples beaches, Collier County, Florida.
SEC. 4034. LOWER ST. JOHNS RIVER, FLORIDA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for environmental restoration, including improved 
water quality, and related purposes, Lower St. Johns River, Florida.
SEC. 4035. HERBERT HOOVER DIKE SUPPLEMENTAL MAJOR REHABILITATION 
                          REPORT, FLORIDA.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 120 days after the date of enactment 
of this Act, the Secretary shall publish a supplemental report to the 
major rehabilitation report for the Herbert Hoover Dike system approved 
by the Chief of Engineers in November 2000.
    (b) Inclusions.--The supplemental report under subsection (a) shall 
include--
            (1) an evaluation of existing conditions at the Herbert 
        Hoover Dike system;
            (2) an identification of additional risks associated with 
        flood events at the system that are equal to or greater than the 
        standard projected flood risks;
            (3) an evaluation of the potential to integrate projects of 
        the Corps of Engineers into an enhanced flood protection system 
        for Lake Okeechobee, including--
                    (A) the potential for additional water storage north 
                of Lake Okeechobee; and
                    (B) an analysis of other project features included 
                in the Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan; and
            (4) a review of the report prepared for the South Florida 
        Water Management District dated April 2006.

    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $1,500,000.
SEC. 4036. VANDERBILT BEACH LAGOON, FLORIDA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for environmental restoration, water supply, and 
improvement of water quality at Vanderbilt Beach Lagoon, Florida.
SEC. 4037. MERIWETHER COUNTY, GEORGIA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for water supply, Meriwether County, Georgia.

[[Page 121 STAT. 1180]]

SEC. 4038. BOISE RIVER, IDAHO.

    The study for flood control, Boise River, Idaho, authorized by 
section 414 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 
324), is modified--
            (1) to add ecosystem restoration and water supply as project 
        purposes to be studied; and
            (2) to require the Secretary to credit toward the non-
        Federal share of the cost of the study the cost, not to exceed 
        $500,000, of work carried out by the non-Federal interest before 
        the date of the partnership agreement for the project if the 
        Secretary determines that the work is integral to the project.
SEC. 4039. BALLARD'S ISLAND SIDE CHANNEL, ILLINOIS.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for ecosystem restoration, Ballard's Island side 
channel, Illinois.
SEC. 4040. CHICAGO, ILLINOIS.

    Section 425(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 
Stat. 2638) is amended by inserting ``Lake Michigan and'' before ``the 
Chicago River''.
SEC. 4041. SALEM, INDIANA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project to provide an additional water supply source for 
Salem, Indiana.
SEC. 4042. BUCKHORN LAKE, KENTUCKY.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine 
the feasibility of modifying the project for flood damage reduction, 
Buckhorn Lake, Kentucky, authorized by section 2 of the Flood Control 
Act of June 28, 1938 (52 Stat. 1217), to add ecosystem restoration and 
recreation as project purposes.
    (b) In-Kind Contributions.--The non-Federal interest may provide the 
non-Federal share of the cost of the study in the form of in-kind 
services and materials.
SEC. 4043. DEWEY LAKE, KENTUCKY.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
modifying the project for Dewey Lake, Kentucky, to add water supply as a 
project purpose.
SEC. 4044. LOUISVILLE, KENTUCKY.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study of the project for flood 
control, Louisville, Kentucky, authorized by section 4 of the Flood 
Control Act of June 28, 1938 (52 Stat. 1217), to investigate measures to 
address the rehabilitation of the project.
SEC. 4045. VIDALIA PORT, LOUISIANA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for navigation improvement at Vidalia, Louisiana.
SEC. 4046. FALL RIVER HARBOR, MASSACHUSETTS AND RHODE ISLAND.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
deepening that portion of the navigation channel of the navigation 
project for Fall River Harbor, Massachusetts and Rhode Island, 
authorized by section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1968

[[Page 121 STAT. 1181]]

(82 Stat. 731), seaward of the Charles M. Braga, Jr. Memorial Bridge, 
Fall River and Somerset, Massachusetts.
SEC. 4047. CLINTON RIVER, MICHIGAN.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for environmental restoration, Clinton River, 
Michigan.
SEC. 4048. HAMBURG AND GREEN OAK TOWNSHIPS, MICHIGAN.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for flood damage reduction on Ore Lake and the 
Huron River for Hamburg and Green Oak Townships, Michigan.
SEC. 4049. LAKE ERIE AT LUNA PIER, MICHIGAN.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for storm damage reduction and other related 
purposes along Lake Erie at Luna Pier, Michigan.
SEC. 4050. DULUTH-SUPERIOR HARBOR, MINNESOTA AND WISCONSIN.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study and prepare a 
report to evaluate the integrity of the bulkhead system located on and 
in the vicinity of Duluth-Superior Harbor, Duluth, Minnesota, and 
Superior, Wisconsin.
    (b) Contents.--The report shall include--
            (1) a determination of causes of corrosion of the bulkhead 
        system;
            (2) recommendations to reduce corrosion of the bulkhead 
        system;
            (3) a description of the necessary repairs to the bulkhead 
        system; and
            (4) an estimate of the cost of addressing the causes of the 
        corrosion and carrying out necessary repairs.
SEC. 4051. NORTHEAST MISSISSIPPI.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
modifying the project for navigation, Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway, 
Alabama and Mississippi, to provide water supply for northeast 
Mississippi.
SEC. 4052. DREDGED MATERIAL DISPOSAL, NEW JERSEY.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project in the vicinity of the Atlantic Intracoastal 
Waterway, New Jersey, for the construction of a dredged material 
disposal transfer facility to make dredged material available for 
beneficial reuse.
SEC. 4053. BAYONNE, NEW JERSEY.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for environmental restoration, including improved 
water quality, enhanced public access, and recreation, on the Kill Van 
Kull, Bayonne, New Jersey.
SEC. 4054. CARTERET, NEW JERSEY.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for environmental restoration, including improved 
water quality, enhanced public access, and recreation, on the Raritan 
River, Carteret, New Jersey.

[[Page 121 STAT. 1182]]

SEC. 4055. GLOUCESTER COUNTY, NEW JERSEY.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for flood damage reduction, Gloucester County, 
New Jersey, including the feasibility of restoring the flood protection 
dikes in Gibbstown, New Jersey, and the associated tidegates in 
Gloucester County, New Jersey.
SEC. 4056. PERTH AMBOY, NEW JERSEY.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for environmental restoration and recreation on 
the Arthur Kill, Perth Amboy, New Jersey.
SEC. 4057. BATAVIA, NEW YORK.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for hydropower and related purposes in the 
vicinity of Batavia, New York.
SEC. 4058. BIG SISTER CREEK, EVANS, NEW YORK.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine 
the feasibility of carrying out a project for flood damage reduction, 
Big Sister Creek, Evans, New York.
    (b) Evaluation of Potential Solutions.--In conducting the study, the 
Secretary shall evaluate potential solutions to flooding from all 
sources, including flooding that results from ice jams.
SEC. 4059. FINGER LAKES, NEW YORK.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for aquatic ecosystem restoration and protection, 
Finger Lakes, New York, to address water quality and aquatic nuisance 
species.
SEC. 4060. LAKE ERIE SHORELINE, BUFFALO, NEW YORK.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for storm damage reduction and shoreline 
protection in the vicinity of Gallagher Beach, Lake Erie Shoreline, 
Buffalo, New York.
SEC. 4061. NEWTOWN CREEK, NEW YORK.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out ecosystem restoration improvements on Newtown Creek, 
Brooklyn and Queens, New York.
SEC. 4062. NIAGARA RIVER, NEW YORK.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for a low-head hydroelectric generating facility 
in the Niagara River, New York.
SEC. 4063. SHORE PARKWAY GREENWAY, BROOKLYN, NEW YORK.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study of the feasibility of carrying 
out a project for shoreline protection in the vicinity of the confluence 
of the Narrows and Gravesend Bay, Upper New York Bay, Shore Parkway 
Greenway, Brooklyn, New York.
SEC. 4064. UPPER DELAWARE RIVER WATERSHED, NEW YORK.

    In accordance with section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 
U.S.C. 1962d-5b), a nonprofit organization may serve, with the consent 
of the affected local government, as the non-Federal interest for a 
study for the Upper Delaware River watershed, New York, being carried 
out under Committee Resolution

[[Page 121 STAT. 1183]]

2495 of the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House 
of Representatives, adopted May 9, 1996.
SEC. 4065. LINCOLN COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study of existing water and water 
quality-related infrastructure in Lincoln County, North Carolina, to 
assist local interests in determining the most efficient and effective 
way to connect county infrastructure.
SEC. 4066. WILKES COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for water supply, Wilkes County, North Carolina.
SEC. 4067. YADKINVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for water supply, Yadkinville, North Carolina.
SEC. 4068. FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION, OHIO.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out projects for flood damage reduction in Cuyahoga, Lake, 
Ashtabula, Geauga, Erie, Lucas, Sandusky, Huron, and Stark Counties, 
Ohio.
SEC. 4069. LAKE ERIE, OHIO.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out projects for power generation at confined disposal 
facilities along Lake Erie, Ohio.
SEC. 4070. OHIO RIVER, OHIO.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out projects for flood damage reduction on the Ohio River in 
Mahoning, Columbiana, Jefferson, Belmont, Noble, Monroe, Washington, 
Athens, Meigs, Gallia, Lawrence, and Scioto Counties, Ohio.
SEC. 4071. TOLEDO HARBOR DREDGED MATERIAL PLACEMENT, TOLEDO, OHIO.

    The Secretary shall study the feasibility of removing previously 
dredged and placed materials from the Toledo Harbor confined disposal 
facility, transporting the materials, and disposing of the materials in 
or at abandoned mine sites in southeastern Ohio.
SEC. 4072. TOLEDO HARBOR, MAUMEE RIVER, AND LAKE CHANNEL PROJECT, 
                          TOLEDO, OHIO.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine 
the feasibility of constructing a project for navigation, Toledo, Ohio.
    (b) Factors for Consideration.--In conducting the study under 
subsection (a), the Secretary shall take into consideration--
            (1) realigning the existing Toledo Harbor channel widening 
        occurring where the River Channel meets the Lake Channel from 
        the northwest to the southeast side of the River Channel;
            (2) realigning the entire 200-foot wide channel located at 
        the upper river terminus of the River Channel southern river 
        embankment towards the northern river embankment; and
            (3) adjusting the existing turning basin to accommodate 
        those changes.

[[Page 121 STAT. 1184]]

SEC. 4073. ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION AND FISH PASSAGE IMPROVEMENTS, 
                          OREGON.

    (a) Study.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of undertaking ecosystem restoration and fish passage 
improvements on rivers throughout the State of Oregon.
    (b) Requirements.--In carrying out the study, the Secretary shall--
            (1) work in coordination with the State of Oregon, local 
        governments, and other Federal agencies; and
            (2) place emphasis on--
                    (A) fish passage and conservation and restoration 
                strategies to benefit species that are listed or 
                proposed for listing as threatened or endangered species 
                under the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531 
                et seq.); and
                    (B) other watershed restoration objectives.

    (c) Pilot Program.--
            (1) In general.--In conjunction with conducting the study 
        under subsection (a), the Secretary may carry out pilot projects 
        to demonstrate the effectiveness of ecosystem restoration and 
        fish passages.
            (2) Authorization of appropriations.--There is authorized to 
        be appropriated $5,000,000 to carry out this subsection.
SEC. 4074. WALLA WALLA RIVER BASIN, OREGON.

    In conducting the study of determine the feasibility of carrying out 
a project for ecosystem restoration, Walla Walla River basin, Oregon, 
the Secretary shall--
            (1) credit toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the 
        study the cost of work carried out by the non-Federal interest 
        before the date of the partnership agreement for the project if 
        the Secretary determines that the work is integral to the 
        project; and
            (2) allow the non-Federal interest to provide the non-
        Federal share of the cost of the study in the form of in-kind 
        services and materials.
SEC. 4075. CHARTIERS CREEK WATERSHED, PENNSYLVANIA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for flood damage reduction, Chartiers Creek 
watershed, Pennsylvania.
SEC. 4076. KINZUA DAM AND ALLEGHENY RESERVOIR, PENNSYLVANIA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study of the project for flood 
control, Kinzua Dam and Allegheny Reservoir, Warren, Pennsylvania, 
authorized by section 5 of the Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936 (49 
Stat. 1570), and modified by section 2 of the Flood Control Act of June 
28, 1938 (52 Stat. 1215), section 2 of the Flood Control Act of August 
18, 1941 (55 Stat. 646), and section 4 of the Flood Control Act of 
December 22, 1944 (58 Stat. 887), to review operations of and identify 
modifications to the project to expand recreational opportunities.
SEC. 4077. WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study of structural 
and nonstructural flood damage reduction, stream bank protection, storm 
water management, channel clearing and modification, and watershed 
coordination measures in the Mahoning

[[Page 121 STAT. 1185]]

River basin, Pennsylvania, the Allegheny River basin, Pennsylvania, and 
the Upper Ohio River basin, Pennsylvania, to provide a level of flood 
protection sufficient to prevent future losses to communities located in 
such basins from flooding such as occurred in September 2004, but not 
less than a 100-year level of flood protection.
    (b) Priority Communities.--In carrying out this section, the 
Secretary shall give priority to the following Pennsylvania communities: 
Marshall Township, Ross Township, Shaler Township, Jackson Township, 
Harmony, Zelienople, Darlington Township, Houston Borough, Chartiers 
Township, Washington, Canton Township, Tarentum Borough, and East Deer 
Township.
SEC. 4078. WILLIAMSPORT, PENNSYLVANIA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study of the project for flood 
control, Williamsport, Pennsylvania, authorized by section 5 of the 
Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936 (49 Stat. 1570), to investigate 
measures to rehabilitate the project.
SEC. 4079. YARDLEY BOROUGH, PENNSYLVANIA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for flood damage reduction, at Yardley Borough, 
Pennsylvania, including the alternative of raising River Road.
SEC. 4080. RIO VALENCIANO, JUNCOS, PUERTO RICO.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to reevaluate 
the project for flood damage reduction and water supply, Rio Valenciano, 
Juncos, Puerto Rico, authorized by section 209 of the Flood Control Act 
of 1962 (76 Stat. 1197) and section 204 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 
(84 Stat. 1828), to determine the feasibility of carrying out the 
project.
    (b) Credit.--The Secretary shall credit toward the non-Federal share 
of the cost of the study the cost of work carried out by the non-Federal 
interest before the date of the partnership agreement for the project if 
the Secretary determines that the work is integral to the project.
SEC. 4081. WOONSOCKET LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECT, BLACKSTONE RIVER 
                          BASIN, RHODE ISLAND.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study, and, not later than June 30, 
2008, submit to Congress a report that describes the results of the 
study, on the flood damage reduction project, Woonsocket, Blackstone 
River basin, Rhode Island, authorized by section 10 of the Flood Control 
Act of December 22, 1944 (58 Stat. 892), to determine the measures 
necessary to restore the level of protection of the project as 
originally designed and constructed.
SEC. 4082. CROOKED CREEK, BENNETTSVILLE, SOUTH CAROLINA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for water supply, Crooked Creek, Bennettsville, 
South Carolina.
SEC. 4083. BROAD RIVER, YORK COUNTY, SOUTH CAROLINA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for water supply, Broad River, York County, South 
Carolina.

[[Page 121 STAT. 1186]]

SEC. 4084. SAVANNAH RIVER, SOUTH CAROLINA AND GEORGIA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall determine the feasibility of 
carrying out projects--
            (1) to improve the Savannah River for navigation and related 
        purposes that may be necessary to support the location of 
        container cargo and other port facilities to be located in 
        Jasper County, South Carolina, in the vicinity of Mile 6 of the 
        Savannah Harbor entrance channel; and
            (2) to remove from the proposed Jasper County port site the 
        easements used by the Corps of Engineers for placement of 
        dredged fill materials for the Savannah Harbor Federal 
        navigation project.

    (b) Factors for Consideration.--In making a determination under 
subsection (a), the Secretary shall take into consideration--
            (1) landside infrastructure;
            (2) the provision of any additional dredged material 
        disposal area as a consequence of removing from the proposed 
        Jasper County port site the easements used by the Corps of 
        Engineers for placement of dredged fill materials for the 
        Savannah Harbor Federal navigation project; and
            (3) the results of the proposed bistate compact between the 
        State of Georgia and the State of South Carolina to own, 
        develop, and operate port facilities at the proposed Jasper 
        County port site, as described in the term sheet executed by the 
        Governor of the State of Georgia and the Governor of the State 
        of South Carolina on March 12, 2007.
SEC. 4085. CHATTANOOGA, TENNESSEE.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for flood damage reduction, Chattanooga Creek, 
Dobbs Branch, Chattanooga, Tennessee.
SEC. 4086. CLEVELAND, TENNESSEE.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for flood damage reduction, Cleveland, Tennessee.
SEC. 4087. CUMBERLAND RIVER, NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for recreation on, riverbank protection for, and 
environmental protection of, the Cumberland River and riparian habitats 
in the city of Nashville and Davidson County, Tennessee.
SEC. 4088. LEWIS, LAWRENCE, AND WAYNE COUNTIES, TENNESSEE.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for water supply for Lewis, Lawrence, and Wayne 
Counties, Tennessee.
SEC. 4089. WOLF RIVER AND NONCONNAH CREEK, MEMPHIS, TENNESSEE.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for flood damage reduction along Wolf River and 
Nonconnah Creek, in the vicinity of Memphis, Tennessee, to include the 
repair, replacement, rehabilitation, and restoration of the following 
pumping stations: Cypress Creek, Nonconnah Creek, Ensley, Marble Bayou, 
and Bayou Gayoso.

[[Page 121 STAT. 1187]]

SEC. 4090. ABILENE, TEXAS.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for water supply, Abilene, Texas.
SEC. 4091. COASTAL TEXAS ECOSYSTEM PROTECTION AND RESTORATION, 
                          TEXAS.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall develop a comprehensive plan to 
determine the feasibility of carrying out projects for flood damage 
reduction, hurricane and storm damage reduction, and ecosystem 
restoration in the coastal areas of the State of Texas.
    (b) Scope.--The comprehensive plan shall provide for the protection, 
conservation, and restoration of wetlands, barrier islands, shorelines, 
and related lands and features that protect critical resources, habitat, 
and infrastructure from the impacts of coastal storms, hurricanes, 
erosion, and subsidence.
    (c) Definition.--For purposes of this section, the term ``coastal 
areas in the State of Texas'' means the coastal areas of the State of 
Texas from the Sabine River on the east to the Rio Grande River on the 
west and includes tidal waters, barrier islands, marshes, coastal 
wetlands, rivers and streams, and adjacent areas.
SEC. 4092. PORT OF GALVESTON, TEXAS.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study of the feasibility of carrying 
out a project for dredged material disposal in the vicinity of the 
project for navigation and environmental restoration, Houston-Galveston 
Navigation Channels, Texas, authorized by section 101(a)(30) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3666).
SEC. 4093. GRAND COUNTY AND MOAB, UTAH.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for water supply for Grand County and the city of 
Moab, Utah, including a review of the impact of current and future 
demands on the Spanish Valley Aquifer.
SEC. 4094. SOUTHWESTERN UTAH.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for flood damage reduction, Santa Clara River, 
Washington, Iron, and Kane Counties, Utah.
SEC. 4095. ECOSYSTEM AND HYDROPOWER GENERATION DAMS, VERMONT.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study of the 
potential to carry out ecosystem restoration and hydropower generation 
at dams in the State of Vermont, including a review of the report of the 
Secretary on the land and water resources of the New England-New York 
region submitted to the President on April 27, 1956 (published as Senate 
Document Number 14, 85th Congress), and other relevant reports.
    (b) Purpose.--The purpose of the study under subsection (a) shall be 
to determine the feasibility of providing water resource improvements 
and small-scale hydropower generation in the State of Vermont, 
including, as appropriate, options for dam restoration, hydropower, dam 
removal, and fish passage enhancement.
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to carry 
out this section $500,000. Such sums shall remain available until 
expended.

[[Page 121 STAT. 1188]]

SEC. 4096. ELLIOTT BAY SEAWALL, SEATTLE, WASHINGTON.

    (a) In General.--The study for rehabilitation of the Elliott Bay 
Seawall, Seattle, Washington, being carried out under Committee 
Resolution 2704 of the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of 
the House of Representatives adopted September 25, 2002, is modified to 
include a determination of the feasibility of reducing future damage to 
the seawall from seismic activity.
    (b) Acceptance of Contributions.--In carrying out the study, the 
Secretary may accept contributions in excess of the non-Federal share of 
the cost of the study from the non-Federal interest to the extent that 
the Secretary determines that the contributions will facilitate 
completion of the study.
    (c) Credit.--The Secretary shall credit toward the non-Federal share 
of the cost of any project authorized by law as a result of the study 
the value of contributions accepted by the Secretary under subsection 
(b).
SEC. 4097. MONONGAHELA RIVER BASIN, NORTHERN WEST VIRGINIA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out aquatic ecosystem restoration and protection projects in 
the watersheds of the Monongahela River Basin lying within the counties 
of Hancock, Ohio, Marshall, Wetzel, Tyler, Pleasants, Wood, Doddridge, 
Monongalia, Marion, Harrison, Taylor, Barbour, Preston, Tucker, Mineral, 
Grant, Gilmer, Brooke, and Rithchie, West Virginia.
SEC. 4098. KENOSHA HARBOR, WISCONSIN.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for navigation, Kenosha Harbor, Wisconsin, 
including the extension of existing piers.
SEC. 4099. JOHNSONVILLE DAM, JOHNSONVILLE, WISCONSIN.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study of the Johnsonville Dam, 
Johnsonville, Wisconsin, to determine if the structure prevents ice jams 
on the Sheboygan River.
SEC. 4100. WAUWATOSA, WISCONSIN.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for flood damage reduction and environmental 
restoration, Menomonee River and Underwood Creek, Wauwatosa, Wisconsin, 
and greater Milwaukee watersheds, Wisconsin.
SEC. 4101. DEBRIS REMOVAL.

    (a) Evaluation.--
            (1) <<NOTE: Deadline.>> In general.--Not later than 90 days 
        after the date of enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General 
        of the United States, in coordination with the Secretary and the 
        Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, and in 
        consultation with affected communities, shall conduct a complete 
        evaluation of Federal and non-Federal demolition, debris 
        removal, segregation, transportation, and disposal practices 
        relating to disaster areas designated in response to Hurricanes 
        Katrina and Rita (including regulated and nonregulated materials 
        and debris).
            (2) Inclusions.--The evaluation under paragraph (1) shall 
        include a review of--
                    (A) compliance with all applicable environmental 
                laws;

[[Page 121 STAT. 1189]]

                    (B) permits issued or required to be issued with 
                respect to debris handling, transportation, storage, or 
                disposal; and
                    (C) administrative actions relating to debris 
                removal and disposal in the disaster areas described in 
                paragraph (1).

    (b) Report.--Not later than 120 days after the date of enactment of 
this Act, the Comptroller General, in consultation with the Secretary 
and the Administrator, shall submit to the Committee on the Environment 
and Public Works of the Senate and the Committee on Transportation and 
Infrastructure of the House of Representatives a report that--
            (1) describes the findings of the Comptroller General with 
        respect to the evaluation under subsection (a);
            (2)(A) certifies compliance with all applicable 
        environmental laws; and
            (B) identifies any area in which a violation of such a law 
        has occurred or is occurring;
            (3) includes recommendations to ensure--
                    (A) the protection of the environment;
                    (B) sustainable practices; and
                    (C) the integrity of hurricane and flood protection 
                infrastructure relating to debris disposal practices;
            (4) contains an enforcement plan that is designed to prevent 
        illegal dumping of hurricane debris in a disaster area; and
            (5) contains plans of the Secretary and the Administrator to 
        involve the public and non-Federal interests, including through 
        the formation of a Federal advisory committee, as necessary, to 
        seek public comment relating to the removal, disposal, and 
        planning for the handling of post-hurricane debris.

    (c) Restriction.--
            (1) In general.--No Federal funds may be used to pay for or 
        reimburse any State or local entity in Louisiana for the 
        disposal of construction and demolition debris generated as a 
        result of Hurricane Katrina in 2005 in a landfill designated for 
        construction and demolition debris as described in section 257.2 
        of title 40, Code of Federal Regulations, unless that waste 
        meets the definition of construction and demolition debris, as 
        specified under Federal law and described in that section on the 
        date of enactment of this Act.
            (2) Applicability.--The restriction in paragraph (1) shall 
        apply only to any disposal that occurs after the date of 
        enactment of this Act.

                         TITLE V--MISCELLANEOUS

SEC. 5001. MAINTENANCE OF NAVIGATION CHANNELS.

    (a) In General.--Upon request of a non-Federal interest, the 
Secretary shall be responsible for maintenance of the following 
navigation channels and breakwaters constructed or improved by the non-
Federal interest if the Secretary determines that such maintenance is 
economically justified and environmentally acceptable and that the 
channel or breakwater was constructed in accordance with applicable 
permits and appropriate engineering and design standards:
            (1) Manatee Harbor basin, Florida.

[[Page 121 STAT. 1190]]

            (2) Tampa Harbor, Sparkman Channel and Davis Island, 
        Florida.
            (3) West turning basin, Canaveral Harbor, Florida.
            (4) Bayou LaFourche Channel, Port Fourchon, Louisiana.
            (5) Calcasieu River at Devil's Elbow, Louisiana.
            (6) Pidgeon Industrial Harbor, Pidgeon Industrial Park, 
        Memphis Harbor, Tennessee.
            (7) Houston Ship Channel, Bayport Cruise Channel and Bayport 
        Cruise turning basin, as part of the existing Bayport Channel, 
        Texas.
            (8) Pix Bayou Navigation Channel, Chambers County, Texas.
            (9) Jacintoport Channel at Houston Ship Channel, Texas.
            (10) Racine Harbor, Wisconsin.

    (b) <<NOTE: Deadline.>> Completion of Assessment.--Not later than 6 
months after the date of receipt of a request from a non-Federal 
interest for Federal assumption of maintenance of a channel listed in 
subsection (a), the Secretary shall make a determination as provided in 
subsection (a) and advise the non-Federal interest of the Secretary's 
determination.
SEC. 5002. WATERSHED MANAGEMENT.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary may provide technical, planning, and 
design assistance to non-Federal interests for carrying out watershed 
management, restoration, and development projects at the locations 
described in subsection (d).
    (b) Specific Measures.--Assistance provided under subsection (a) may 
be in support of non-Federal projects for the following purposes:
            (1) Management and restoration of water quality.
            (2) Control and remediation of toxic sediments.
            (3) Restoration of degraded streams, rivers, wetlands, and 
        other water bodies to their natural condition as a means to 
        control flooding, excessive erosion, and sedimentation.
            (4) Protection and restoration of watersheds, including 
        urban watersheds.
            (5) Demonstration of technologies for nonstructural measures 
        to reduce destructive impacts of flooding.

    (c) Non-Federal Share.--The non-Federal share of the cost of 
assistance provided under subsection (a) shall be 25 percent.
    (d) Project Locations.--The locations referred to in subsection (a) 
are the following:
            (1) Charlotte Harbor watershed, Florida.
            (2) Those portions of the watersheds of the Chattahoochee, 
        Etowah, Flint, Ocmulgee, and Oconee Rivers lying within the 
        counties of Bartow, Cherokee, Clayton, Cobb, Coweta, DeKalb, 
        Douglas, Fayette, Fulton, Forsyth, Gwinnett, Hall, Henry, 
        Paulding, Rockdale, and Walton, Georgia.
            (3) Kinkaid Lake, Jackson County, Illinois.
            (4) Amite River basin, Louisiana.
            (5) East Atchafalaya River basin, Iberville Parish and 
        Pointe Coupee Parish, Louisiana.
            (6) Red River watershed, Louisiana.
            (7) Taunton River basin, Massachusetts.
            (8) Marlboro Township, New Jersey.
            (9) Esopus, Plattekill, and Rondout Creeks, Greene, 
        Sullivan, and Ulster Counties, New York.

[[Page 121 STAT. 1191]]

            (10) Greenwood Lake watershed, New York and New Jersey.
            (11) Long Island Sound watershed, New York.
            (12) Ramapo River watershed, New York.
            (13) Tuscarawas River basin, Ohio.
            (14) Western Lake Erie basin, Ohio.
            (15) Those portions of the watersheds of the Beaver, Upper 
        Ohio, Connoquenessing, Lower Allegheny, Kiskiminetas, Lower 
        Monongahela, Youghiogheny, Shenango, and Mahoning Rivers lying 
        within the counties of Beaver, Butler, Lawrence, and Mercer, 
        Pennsylvania.
            (16) Otter Creek watershed, Pennsylvania.
            (17) Unami Creek watershed, Milford Township, Pennsylvania.
            (18) Sauk River basin, Washington.

    (e) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $15,000,000.
SEC. 5003. DAM SAFETY.

    (a) Assistance.--The Secretary may provide assistance to enhance dam 
safety at the following locations:
            (1) Fish Creek Dam, Blaine County, Idaho.
            (2) Keith Creek, Rockford, Illinois.
            (3) Mount Zion Mill Pond Dam, Fulton County, Indiana.
            (4) Hamilton Dam, Flint River, Flint, Michigan.
            (5) Congers Lake Dam, Rockland County, New York.
            (6) Lake Lucille Dam, New City, New York.
            (7) Peconic River Dams, town of Riverhead, Suffolk, Long 
        Island, New York.
            (8) Pine Grove Lakes Dam, Sloatsburg, New York.
            (9) State Dam, Auburn, New York.
            (10) Whaley Lake Dam, Pawling, New York.
            (11) Brightwood Dam, Concord Township, Ohio.
            (12) Ingham Spring Dam, Solebury Township, Pennsylvania.
            (13) Leaser Lake Dam, Lehigh County, Pennsylvania.
            (14) Stillwater Dam, Monroe County, Pennsylvania.
            (15) Wissahickon Creek Dam, Montgomery County, Pennsylvania.

    (b) Special Rule.--The assistance provided under subsection (a) for 
State Dam, Auburn, New York, shall be for a project for rehabilitation 
in accordance with the report on State Dam Rehabilitation, Owasco Lake 
Outlet, New York, dated March 1999, if the Secretary determines that the 
project is feasible.
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out subsection (a) $12,000,000.
SEC. 5004. <<NOTE: 33 USC 701b-14.>> STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY 
                          EVALUATIONS.

    (a) In General.--Upon request of a non-Federal interest, the 
Secretary shall evaluate the structural integrity and effectiveness of a 
project for flood damage reduction and, if the Secretary determines that 
the project does not meet such minimum standards as the Secretary may 
establish and absent action by the Secretary the project will fail, the 
Secretary may take such action as may be necessary to restore the 
integrity and effectiveness of the project.
    (b) Priority.--The Secretary shall carry out an evaluation and take 
such actions as may be necessary under subsection (a) for

[[Page 121 STAT. 1192]]

the project for flood damage reduction, Arkansas River Levees, Arkansas.
SEC. 5005. FLOOD MITIGATION PRIORITY AREAS.

    (a) In General.--Section 212(e) of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1999 (33 U.S.C. 2332(e); 114 Stat. 2599) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``and'' at the end of paragraphs (23) and 
        (27);
            (2) by striking the period at the end of paragraph (28) and 
        inserting a semicolon; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(29) Ascension Parish, Louisiana;
            ``(30) East Baton Rouge Parish, Louisiana;
            ``(31) Iberville Parish, Louisiana;
            ``(32) Livingston Parish, Louisiana; and
            ``(33) Pointe Coupee Parish, Louisiana.''.

    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--Section 212(i)(1) of such Act 
(33 U.S.C. 2332(i)(1)) is amended by striking ``section--'' and all that 
follows before the period at the end and inserting ``section 
$20,000,000''.
SEC. 5006. ADDITIONAL ASSISTANCE FOR AUTHORIZED PROJECTS.

    (a) In General.--Section 219(e) of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 110 Stat. 3757; 113 Stat. 334) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``and'' at the end of paragraph (7);
            (2) by striking the period at the end of paragraph (8) and 
        inserting a semicolon; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(9) $35,000,000 for the project described in subsection 
        (c)(18);
            ``(10) $27,000,000 for the project described in subsection 
        (c)(19);
            ``(11) $20,000,000 for the project described in subsection 
        (c)(20);
            ``(12) $35,000,000 for the project described in subsection 
        (c)(23);
            ``(13) $20,000,000 for the project described in subsection 
        (c)(25);
            ``(14) $20,000,000 for the project described in subsection 
        (c)(26);
            ``(15) $35,000,000 for the project described in subsection 
        (c)(27);
            ``(16) $20,000,000 for the project described in subsection 
        (c)(28); and
            ``(17) $30,000,000 for the project described in subsection 
        (c)(40).''.

    (b) East Arkansas Enterprise Community, Arkansas.--Federal 
assistance made available under the rural enterprise zone program of the 
Department of Agriculture may be used toward payment of the non-Federal 
share of the costs of the project described in section 219(c)(20) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (114 Stat. 2763A-219) if such 
assistance is authorized to be used for such purposes.

[[Page 121 STAT. 1193]]

SEC. 5007. EXPEDITED COMPLETION OF REPORTS AND CONSTRUCTION FOR 
                          CERTAIN PROJECTS.

    The Secretary shall expedite completion of the reports and, if the 
Secretary determines that the project is feasible, shall expedite 
completion of construction for the following projects:
            (1) Project for navigation, Whittier, Alaska.
            (2) Laguna Creek watershed flood damage reduction project, 
        California.
            (3) Daytona Beach shore protection project, Florida.
            (4) Flagler Beach shore protection project, Florida.
            (5) St. Johns County shore protection project, Florida.
            (6) Chenier Plain environmental restoration project, 
        Louisiana.
            (7) False River, Louisiana, being carried out under section 
        206 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 
        2330).
            (8) North River, Peabody, Massachusetts, being carried out 
        under section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 
        701s).
            (9) Fulmer Creek, Village of Mohawk, New York, being carried 
        out under section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 (33 
        U.S.C. 701s).
            (10) Moyer Creek, Village of Frankfort, New York, being 
        carried out under section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 
        (33 U.S.C. 701s).
            (11) Steele Creek, Village of Ilion, New York, being carried 
        out under section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 (33 
        U.S.C. 701s).
            (12) Oriskany Wildlife Management Area, Rome, New York, 
        being carried out under section 206 of the Water Resources 
        Development Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 2330).
            (13) Whitney Point Lake, Otselic River, Whitney Point, New 
        York, being carried out under section 1135 of the Water 
        Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2309a).
            (14) Chenango Lake, Chenango County, New York, being carried 
        out under section 206 of the Water Resources Development Act of 
        1996 (33 U.S.C. 2330).
SEC. 5008. EXPEDITED COMPLETION OF REPORTS FOR CERTAIN PROJECTS.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall expedite completion of the 
reports for the following projects and, if the Secretary determines that 
a project is justified in the completed report, proceed directly to 
project preconstruction, engineering, and design:
            (1) Project for water supply, Little Red River, Arkansas.
            (2) Watershed study, Fountain Creek, north of Pueblo, 
        Colorado.
            (3) Project for shoreline stabilization at Egmont Key, 
        Florida.
            (4) Project for navigation, Sabine-Neches Waterway, Texas 
        and Louisiana.
            (5) Project for ecosystem restoration, University Lake, 
        Baton Rouge, Louisiana.

    (b) Special Rule for Egmont Key, Florida.--In carrying out the 
project for shoreline stabilization at Egmont Key, Florida, referred to 
in subsection (a)(3), the Secretary shall waive any cost

[[Page 121 STAT. 1194]]

share to be provided by non-Federal interests for any portion of the 
project that benefits federally owned property.
SEC. 5009. SOUTHEASTERN WATER RESOURCES ASSESSMENT.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct, at Federal expense, an 
assessment of the water resources needs of the river basins and 
watersheds of the southeastern United States.
    (b) Cooperative Agreements.--In carrying out the assessment, the 
Secretary may enter into cooperative agreements with State and local 
agencies, non-Federal and nonprofit entities, and regional researchers.
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated $7,000,000 to carry out this section.
SEC. 5010. MISSOURI AND MIDDLE MISSISSIPPI RIVERS ENHANCEMENT 
                          PROJECT.

    Section 514 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 
Stat. 343; 117 Stat. 142) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (b)(2)(A) by adding at the end the 
        following: ``The Secretary shall ensure that such activities are 
        carried out throughout the geographic area that is subject to 
        the plan.'';
            (2) by redesignating subsections (f) and (g) as subsections 
        (g) and (h), respectively;
            (3) by inserting after subsection (e) the following:

    ``(f) Nonprofit Entities.--In accordance with section 221(b) of the 
Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b(b)), for any project or 
activity carried out under this section, a non-Federal interest may 
include a nonprofit entity with the consent of the affected local 
government.'';
            (4) in subsection (g) (as redesignated by paragraph (2) of 
        this section) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(4) Non-federal share.--
                    ``(A) In general.--The non-Federal share of the 
                costs of activities carried out under the plan may be 
                provided--
                          ``(i) in cash;
                          ``(ii) by the provision of land, easements, 
                      rights-of-way, relocations, or disposal areas;
                          ``(iii) by in-kind services to implement the 
                      project; or
                          ``(iv) by any combination thereof.
                    ``(B) Private ownership.--Land needed for activities 
                carried out under the plan and credited toward the non-
                Federal share of the cost of an activity may remain in 
                private ownership subject to easements that are--
                          ``(i) satisfactory to the Secretary; and
                          ``(ii) necessary to ensure achievement of the 
                      project purposes.''; and
            (5) in subsection (h) (as redesignated by paragraph (2) of 
        this section) by striking ``for the period of fiscal years 2003 
        and 2004.'' and inserting ``per fiscal year through fiscal year 
        2015.''.
SEC. 5011. GREAT LAKES FISHERY AND ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION PROGRAM.

    (a) Great Lakes Fishery and Ecosystem Restoration.--Section 506(c) 
of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-22(c)) 
is amended--

[[Page 121 STAT. 1195]]

            (1) by redesignating paragraphs (2) and (3) as paragraphs 
        (3) and (4), respectively;
            (2) by inserting after paragraph (1) the following:
            ``(2) Reconnaissance studies.--Before planning, designing, 
        or constructing a project under paragraph (3), the Secretary 
        shall carry out a reconnaissance study--
                    ``(A) to identify methods of restoring the fishery, 
                ecosystem, and beneficial uses of the Great Lakes; and
                    ``(B) to determine whether planning of a project 
                under paragraph (3) should proceed.''; and
            (3) in paragraph (4)(A) (as redesignated by paragraph (1) of 
        this subsection) by striking ``paragraph (2)'' and inserting 
        ``paragraph (3)''.

    (b) Cost Sharing.--Section 506(f) of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 2000 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-22(f)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (2)--
                    (A) by striking ``The Federal share'' and inserting 
                ``Except for reconnaissance studies, the Federal 
                share''; and
                    (B) by striking ``(2) or (3)'' and inserting ``(3) 
                or (4)'';
            (2) in paragraph (3)--
                    (A) in subparagraph (A) by striking ``subsection 
                (c)(2)'' and inserting ``subsection (c)(3)''; and
                    (B) in subparagraph (B) by striking ``50 percent'' 
                and inserting ``100 percent''; and
            (3) in paragraph (5) by striking ``Notwithstanding'' and 
        inserting ``In accordance with''.
SEC. 5012. GREAT LAKES REMEDIAL ACTION PLANS AND SEDIMENT 
                          REMEDIATION.

    Section 401(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (33 
U.S.C. 1268 note; 104 Stat. 4644; 114 Stat. 2613) is amended by striking 
``through 2006'' and inserting ``through 2012''.
SEC. 5013. GREAT LAKES TRIBUTARY MODELS.

    Section 516(g)(2) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (33 
U.S.C. 2326b(g)(2)) is amended by striking ``through 2006'' and 
inserting ``through 2012''.
SEC. 5014. <<NOTE: 33 USC 426o-2.>> GREAT LAKES NAVIGATION AND 
                          PROTECTION.

    (a) Great Lakes Navigation.--Using available funds, the Secretary 
shall expedite the operation and maintenance, including dredging, of the 
navigation features of the Great Lakes and Connecting Channels for the 
purpose of supporting commercial navigation to authorized project 
depths.
    (b) Great Lakes Pilot Project.--Using available funds, the Director 
of the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, in coordination with 
the Secretary, the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, 
the Commandant of the Coast Guard, and the Director of the United States 
Fish and Wildlife Service, shall carry out a pilot project, on an 
emergency basis, to control and prevent further spreading of viral 
hemorrhagic septicemia in the Great Lakes and Connecting Channels.
    (c) Great Lakes and Connecting Channels Defined.--In this section, 
the term ``Great Lakes and Connecting Channels'' includes Lakes 
Superior, Huron, Michigan, Erie, and Ontario, all connecting waters 
between and among such lakes used for commercial navigation, any 
navigation features in such lakes or waters that are a Federal operation 
or maintenance responsibility, and

[[Page 121 STAT. 1196]]

areas of the Saint Lawrence River that are operated or maintained by the 
Federal Government for commercial navigation.
SEC. 5015. SAINT LAWRENCE SEAWAY.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary is authorized, using amounts 
contributed by the Saint Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation under 
subsection (b), to carry out projects for operations, maintenance, 
repair, and rehabilitation, including associated maintenance dredging, 
of the Eisenhower and Snell lock facilities and related navigational 
infrastructure for the Saint Lawrence Seaway, at a total cost of 
$134,650,000.
    (b) Source of Funds.--The Secretary is authorized to accept funds 
from the Saint Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation to carry out 
projects under this section. Such funds may include amounts made 
available to the Corporation from the Harbor Maintenance Trust Fund and 
the general fund of the Treasury of the United States pursuant to 
section 210 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 
2238).
    (c) Limitation on Statutory Construction.--Nothing in this section 
authorizes the construction of any project to increase the depth or 
width of the navigation channel to a level greater than that previously 
authorized and existing on the date of enactment of this Act or to 
increase the dimensions of the Eisenhower and Snell lock facilities.
SEC. 5016. UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER DISPERSAL BARRIER PROJECT.

    (a) <<NOTE: Study.>> In General.--The Secretary, in consultation 
with appropriate Federal and State agencies, shall study, design, and 
carry out a project to delay, deter, impede, or restrict the dispersal 
of aquatic nuisance species into the northern reaches of the Upper 
Mississippi River system. <<NOTE: Deadline.>> The Secretary shall 
complete the study, design, and construction of the project not later 
than 6 months after the date of enactment of this Act.

    (b) Dispersal Barrier.--In carrying out subsection (a), the 
Secretary, at Federal expense, shall--
            (1) investigate and identify environmentally sound methods 
        for preventing and reducing the dispersal of aquatic nuisance 
        species through the northern reaches of the Upper Mississippi 
        River system;
            (2) use available technologies and measures;
            (3) monitor and evaluate, in cooperation with the Director 
        of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, the 
        effectiveness of the project in preventing and reducing the 
        dispersal of aquatic nuisance species through the northern 
        reaches of the Upper Mississippi River system;
            (4) <<NOTE: Reports.>> submit to the Committee on 
        Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of 
        Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public 
        Works of the Senate a report on the results of the evaluation 
        conducted under paragraph (3); and
            (5) operate and maintain the project.

    (c) Requirement.--In conducting the study under subsection (a), the 
Secretary shall take into consideration the feasibility of locating the 
dispersal barrier at the lock portion of the project at Lock and Dam 11 
in the Upper Mississippi River basin.
    (d) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated $4,000,000 to carry out this section.

[[Page 121 STAT. 1197]]

SEC. 5017. ESTUARY RESTORATION.

    (a) Purposes.--Section 102 of the Estuary Restoration Act of 2000 
(33 U.S.C. 2901) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1) by inserting before the semicolon at 
        the end the following: ``by implementing a coordinated Federal 
        approach to estuary habitat restoration activities, including 
        the use of common monitoring standards and a common system for 
        tracking restoration acreage'';
            (2) in paragraph (2) by inserting ``and implement'' after 
        ``to develop''; and
            (3) in paragraph (3) by inserting ``through cooperative 
        agreements'' after ``restoration projects''.

    (b) Definition of Estuary Habitat Restoration Plan.--Section 
103(6)(A) of the Estuary Restoration Act of 2000 (33 U.S.C. 2902(6)(A)) 
is amended by striking ``Federal or State'' and inserting ``Federal, 
State, or regional''.
    (c) Estuary Habitat Restoration Program.--Section 104 of the Estuary 
Restoration Act of 2000 (33 U.S.C. 2903) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a) by inserting ``through the award of 
        contracts and cooperative agreements'' after ``assistance'';
            (2) in subsection (c)--
                    (A) in paragraph (3)(A) by inserting ``or State'' 
                after ``Federal''; and
                    (B) in paragraph (4)(B) by inserting ``or approach'' 
                after ``technology'';
            (3) in subsection (d)--
                    (A) in paragraph (1)--
                          (i) by striking ``Except'' and inserting the 
                      following:
                    ``(A) In general.--Except''; and
                          (ii) by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(B) Monitoring.--
                          ``(i) Costs.--The costs of monitoring an 
                      estuary habitat restoration project funded under 
                      this title may be included in the total cost of 
                      the estuary habitat restoration project.
                          ``(ii) Goals.--The goals of the monitoring 
                      shall be--
                                    ``(I) to measure the effectiveness 
                                of the restoration project; and
                                    ``(II) to allow adaptive management 
                                to ensure project success.'';
                    (B) in paragraph (2) by inserting ``or approach'' 
                after ``technology''; and
                    (C) in paragraph (3) by inserting ``(including 
                monitoring)'' after ``services'';
            (4) in subsection (f)(1)(B) by inserting ``long-term'' 
        before ``maintenance''; and
            (5) in subsection (g)--
                    (A) by striking ``In carrying'' and inserting the 
                following:
            ``(1) In general.--In carrying''; and
                    (B) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(2) Small projects.--
                    ``(A) Small project defined.--In this paragraph, the 
                term `small project' means a project carried out under 
                this title with an estimated Federal cost of less than 
                $1,000,000.

[[Page 121 STAT. 1198]]

                    ``(B) Delegation of project implementation.--In 
                carrying out this section, the Secretary, on 
                recommendation of the Council, may delegate 
                implementation of a small project to--
                          ``(i) the Secretary of the Interior (acting 
                      through the Director of the United States Fish and 
                      Wildlife Service);
                          ``(ii) the Under Secretary for Oceans and 
                      Atmosphere of the Department of Commerce;
                          ``(iii) the Administrator of the Environmental 
                      Protection Agency; or
                          ``(iv) the Secretary of Agriculture.
                    ``(C) Funding.--A small project delegated to the 
                head of a Federal department or agency under this 
                paragraph may be carried out using funds appropriated to 
                the department or agency under section 109(a)(1) or 
                other funds available to the department or agency.
                    ``(D) Agreements.--The head of a Federal department 
                or agency to which a small project is delegated under 
                this paragraph shall enter into an agreement with the 
                non-Federal interest for the project generally in 
                conformance with the criteria in subsections (d) and 
                (e). Cooperative agreements may be used for any 
                delegated project to allow the non-Federal interest to 
                carry out the project on behalf of the Federal 
                agency.''.

    (d) Establishment of Estuary Habitat Restoration Council.--Section 
105(b) of the Estuary Restoration Act of 2000 (33 U.S.C. 2904(b)) is 
amended--
            (1) in paragraph (4) by striking ``and'' after the 
        semicolon;
            (2) in paragraph (5) by striking the period at the end and 
        inserting a semicolon; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(6) cooperating in the implementation of the strategy 
        developed under section 106;
            ``(7) recommending standards for monitoring for restoration 
        projects and contribution of project information to the database 
        developed under section 107; and
            ``(8) otherwise using the respective authorities of the 
        Council members to carry out this title.''.

    (e) Monitoring of Estuary Habitat Restoration Projects.--Section 
107(d) of the Estuary Restoration Act of 2000 (33 U.S.C. 2906(d)) is 
amended by striking ``compile'' and inserting ``have general data 
compilation, coordination, and analysis responsibilities to carry out 
this title and in support of the strategy developed under this section, 
including compilation of''.
    (f) Reporting.--Section 108(a) of the Estuary Restoration Act of 
2000 (33 U.S.C. 2907(a)) is amended by striking ``At the end of the 
third and fifth fiscal years following the date of enactment of this 
Act'' and inserting ``Not later than September 30, 2008, and every 2 
years thereafter''.
    (g) Funding.--Section 109(a) of the Estuary Restoration Act of 2000 
(33 U.S.C. 2908(a)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1)--
                    (A) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A) by 
                striking ``to the Secretary''; and
                    (B) by striking subparagraphs (A) through (D) and 
                inserting the following:

[[Page 121 STAT. 1199]]

                    ``(A) to the Secretary, $25,000,000 for each of 
                fiscal years 2008 through 2012;
                    ``(B) to the Secretary of the Interior (acting 
                through the Director of the United States Fish and 
                Wildlife Service), $2,500,000 for each of fiscal years 
                2008 through 2012;
                    ``(C) to the Under Secretary for Oceans and 
                Atmosphere of the Department of Commerce, $2,500,000 for 
                each of fiscal years 2008 through 2012;
                    ``(D) to the Administrator of the Environmental 
                Protection Agency, $2,500,000 for each of fiscal years 
                2008 through 2012; and
                    ``(E) to the Secretary of Agriculture, $2,500,000 
                for each of fiscal years 2008 through 2012.''; and
            (2) in the first sentence of paragraph (2)--
                    (A) by inserting ``and other information compiled 
                under section 107'' after ``this title''; and
                    (B) by striking ``2005'' and inserting ``2012''.

    (h) General Provisions.--Section 110 of the Estuary Restoration Act 
of 2000 (33 U.S.C. 2909) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (b)(1)--
                    (A) by inserting ``or contracts'' after 
                ``agreements''; and
                    (B) by inserting ``, nongovernmental 
                organizations,'' after ``agencies''; and
            (2) by striking subsections (d) and (e).
SEC. 5018. MISSOURI RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, MITIGATION, RECOVERY, 
                          AND RESTORATION, IOWA, KANSAS, MISSOURI, 
                          MONTANA, NEBRASKA, NORTH DAKOTA, SOUTH 
                          DAKOTA, AND WYOMING.

    (a) Study.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary, in consultation with the 
        Missouri River Recovery Implementation Committee to be 
        established under subsection (b)(1), shall conduct a study of 
        the Missouri River and its tributaries to determine actions 
        required--
                    (A) to mitigate losses of aquatic and terrestrial 
                habitat;
                    (B) to recover federally listed species under the 
                Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.); 
                and
                    (C) to restore the ecosystem to prevent further 
                declines among other native species.
            (2) Funding.--The study to be conducted under paragraph (1) 
        shall be funded using amounts made available to carry out the 
        Missouri River recovery and mitigation plan authorized by 
        section 601(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 
        (100 Stat. 4143).

    (b) Missouri River Recovery Implementation Committee.--
            (1) <<NOTE: Deadline.>> Establishment.--Not later than 6 
        months after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary 
        shall establish a committee to be known as the Missouri River 
        Recovery Implementation Committee (in this section referred to 
        as the ``Committee'').
            (2) Membership.--The Committee shall include representatives 
        from--
                    (A) Federal agencies;
                    (B) States located near the Missouri River basin; 
                and
                    (C) other appropriate entities, as determined by the 
                Secretary, including--

[[Page 121 STAT. 1200]]

                          (i) water management and fish and wildlife 
                      agencies;
                          (ii) Indian tribes located near the Missouri 
                      River basin; and
                          (iii) nongovernmental stakeholders, which may 
                      include--
                                    (I) navigation interests;
                                    (II) irrigation interests;
                                    (III) flood control interests;
                                    (IV) fish, wildlife, and 
                                conservation organizations;
                                    (V) recreation interests; and
                                    (VI) power supply interests.
            (3) Duties.--The Committee shall--
                    (A) with respect to the study to be conducted under 
                subsection (a)(1), provide guidance to the Secretary and 
                any affected Federal agency, State agency, or Indian 
                tribe; and
                    (B) provide guidance to the Secretary with respect 
                to the Missouri River recovery and mitigation plan in 
                existence on the date of enactment of this Act, 
                including recommendations relating to--
                          (i) changes to the implementation strategy 
                      from the use of adaptive management;
                          (ii) coordination of the development of 
                      consistent policies, strategies, plans, programs, 
                      projects, activities, and priorities for the 
                      Missouri River recovery and mitigation plan;
                          (iii) exchange of information regarding 
                      programs, projects, and activities of the agencies 
                      and entities represented on the Committee to 
                      promote the goals of the Missouri River recovery 
                      and mitigation plan;
                          (iv) establishment of such working groups as 
                      the Committee determines to be necessary to assist 
                      in carrying out the duties of the Committee, 
                      including duties relating to public policy and 
                      scientific issues;
                          (v) facilitating the resolution of interagency 
                      and intergovernmental conflicts between entities 
                      represented on the Committee associated with the 
                      Missouri River recovery and mitigation plan;
                          (vi) coordination of scientific and other 
                      research associated with the Missouri River 
                      recovery and mitigation plan; and
                          (vii) annual preparation of a work plan and 
                      associated budget requests.
            (4) Recommendations and guidance.--In providing 
        recommendations and guidance from the Committee, the members of 
        the Committee may include dissenting opinions.
            (5) Compensation; travel expenses.--
                    (A) Compensation.--Members of the Committee shall 
                not receive compensation from the Secretary in carrying 
                out the duties of the Committee under this section.
                    (B) Travel expenses.--Travel expenses incurred by a 
                member of the Committee in carrying out the duties of 
                the Committee under this section shall not be eligible 
                for Federal reimbursement.

[[Page 121 STAT. 1201]]

    (c) Nonapplicability of FACA.--The Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 
U.S.C. App.) shall not apply to the Committee.
SEC. 5019. <<NOTE: Contracts.>> SUSQUEHANNA, DELAWARE, AND POTOMAC 
                          RIVER BASINS, DELAWARE, MARYLAND, 
                          PENNSYLVANIA, AND VIRGINIA.

    (a) Ex Officio Member.--Notwithstanding section 3001(a) of the 1997 
Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Act for Recovery From Natural 
Disasters, and for Overseas Peacekeeping Efforts, Including Those in 
Bosnia (Public Law 105-18; 111 Stat. 176), section 2.2 of the 
Susquehanna River Basin Compact to which consent was given by Public Law 
91-575 (84 Stat. 1512), and section 2.2 of the Delaware River Basin 
Compact to which consent was given by Public Law 87-328 (75 Stat. 691), 
beginning in fiscal year 2002, and each fiscal year thereafter, the 
Division Engineer, North Atlantic Division, Corps of Engineers--
            (1) shall be--
                    (A) the ex officio United States member of the 
                Susquehanna River Basin Compact and the Delaware River 
                Basin Compact; and
                    (B) one of the 3 members appointed by the President 
                under the Potomac River Basin Compact to which consent 
                was given by Public Law 91-407 (84 Stat. 856);
            (2) shall serve without additional compensation; and
            (3) may designate an alternate member in accordance with the 
        terms of those compacts.

    (b) Authorization To Allocate.--The Secretary shall allocate funds 
to the Susquehanna River Basin Commission, Delaware River Basin 
Commission, and the Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin to 
fulfill the equitable funding requirements of the respective interstate 
compacts.
    (c) Water Supply and Conservation Storage, Delaware River Basin.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary shall enter into an agreement 
        with the Delaware River Basin Commission to provide temporary 
        water supply and conservation storage at the Francis E. Walter 
        Dam, Pennsylvania, for any period during which the Commission 
        has determined that a drought warning or drought emergency 
        exists.
            (2) Limitation.--The agreement shall provide that the cost 
        for water supply and conservation storage under paragraph (1) 
        shall not exceed the incremental operating costs associated with 
        providing the storage.

    (d) Water Supply and Conservation Storage, Susquehanna River 
Basin.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary shall enter into an agreement 
        with the Susquehanna River Basin Commission to provide temporary 
        water supply and conservation storage at Federal facilities 
        operated by the Corps of Engineers in the Susquehanna River 
        basin for any period for which the Commission has determined 
        that a drought warning or drought emergency exists.
            (2) Limitation.--The agreement shall provide that the cost 
        for water supply and conservation storage under paragraph (1) 
        shall not exceed the incremental operating costs associated with 
        providing the storage.

    (e) Water Supply and Conservation Storage, Potomac River Basin.--

[[Page 121 STAT. 1202]]

            (1) In general.--The Secretary shall enter into an agreement 
        with the Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin to 
        provide temporary water supply and conservation storage at 
        Federal facilities operated by the Corps of Engineers in the 
        Potomac River basin for any period for which the Commission has 
        determined that a drought warning or drought emergency exists.
            (2) Limitation.--The agreement shall provide that the cost 
        for water supply and conservation storage under paragraph (1) 
        shall not exceed the incremental operating costs associated with 
        providing the storage.
SEC. 5020. CHESAPEAKE BAY ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION AND PROTECTION 
                          PROGRAM.

    (a) Form of Assistance.--Section 510(a)(2) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3759) is amended by striking ``, and 
beneficial uses of dredged material'' and inserting ``, beneficial uses 
of dredged material, and restoration of submerged aquatic vegetation''.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--Section 510(i) of such Act 
(110 Stat. 3761) is amended by striking ``$10,000,000'' and inserting 
``$40,000,000''.
SEC. 5021. CHESAPEAKE BAY OYSTER RESTORATION, VIRGINIA AND 
                          MARYLAND.

    Section 704(b) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 
U.S.C. 2263(b)) is amended--
            (1) by redesignating paragraph (2) as paragraph (4);
            (2) in paragraph (1)--
                    (A) in the second sentence by striking 
                ``$30,000,000'' and inserting ``$50,000,000''; and
                    (B) in the third sentence by striking ``Such 
                projects'' and inserting the following:
            ``(2) Inclusions.--Such projects'';
            (3) by striking paragraph (2)(D) (as redesignated by 
        paragraph (2)(B) of this subsection) and inserting the 
        following:
                    ``(D) the restoration and rehabilitation of habitat 
                for fish, including native oysters, in the Chesapeake 
                Bay and its tributaries in Virginia and Maryland, 
                including--
                          ``(i) the construction of oyster bars and 
                      reefs;
                          ``(ii) the rehabilitation of existing marginal 
                      habitat;
                          ``(iii) the use of appropriate alternative 
                      substrate material in oyster bar and reef 
                      construction;
                          ``(iv) the construction and upgrading of 
                      oyster hatcheries; and
                          ``(v) activities relating to increasing the 
                      output of native oyster broodstock for seeding and 
                      monitoring of restored sites to ensure ecological 
                      success.
            ``(3) Restoration and rehabilitation activities.--The 
        restoration and rehabilitation activities described in paragraph 
        (2)(D) shall be--
                    ``(A) for the purpose of establishing permanent 
                sanctuaries and harvest management areas; and
                    ``(B) consistent with plans and strategies for 
                guiding the restoration of the Chesapeake Bay oyster 
                resource and fishery.''; and
            (4) by adding at the end the following:

[[Page 121 STAT. 1203]]

            ``(5) Definition of ecological success.--In this subsection, 
        the term `ecological success' means--
                    ``(A) achieving a tenfold increase in native oyster 
                biomass by the year 2010, from a 1994 baseline; and
                    ``(B) the establishment of a sustainable fishery as 
                determined by a broad scientific and economic 
                consensus.''.
SEC. 5022. <<NOTE: 16 USC 1451 note.>> HYPOXIA ASSESSMENT.

    The Secretary may participate with Federal, State, and local 
agencies, non-Federal and nonprofit entities, regional researchers, and 
other interested parties to assess hypoxia in the Gulf of Mexico.
SEC. 5023. POTOMAC RIVER WATERSHED ASSESSMENT AND TRIBUTARY 
                          STRATEGY EVALUATION AND MONITORING 
                          PROGRAM.

    The Secretary may participate in the Potomac River watershed 
assessment and tributary strategy evaluation and monitoring program to 
identify a series of resource management indicators to accurately 
monitor the effectiveness of the implementation of the agreed upon 
tributary strategies and other public policies that pertain to natural 
resource protection of the Potomac River watershed.
SEC. 5024. <<NOTE: 33 USC 467f-1.>> LOCK AND DAM SECURITY.

    (a) Standards.--The Secretary, in consultation with the Federal 
Emergency Management Agency, the Tennessee Valley Authority, and the 
Coast Guard, shall develop standards for the security of locks and dams, 
including the testing and certification of vessel exclusion barriers.
    (b) Site Surveys.--At the request of a lock or dam owner, the 
Secretary shall provide technical assistance, on a reimbursable basis, 
to improve lock or dam security.
    (c) Cooperative Agreement.--The Secretary may enter into a 
cooperative agreement with a nonprofit alliance of public and private 
organizations that has the mission of promoting safe waterways and 
seaports to carry out testing and certification activities, and to 
perform site surveys, under this section.
    (d) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated $3,000,000 to carry out this section.
SEC. 5025. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM FOR COLUMBIA AND SNAKE 
                          RIVER SALMON SURVIVAL.

    Section 511 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (16 
U.S.C. 3301 note; 110 Stat. 3761; 113 Stat. 375) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)(6) by striking ``$10,000,000'' and 
        inserting ``$25,000,000''; and
            (2) in subsection (c)(2) by striking ``$1,000,000'' and 
        inserting ``$10,000,000''.
SEC. 5026. <<NOTE: 5 USC 5343 note.>> WAGE SURVEYS.

    Employees of the Corps of Engineers who are paid wages determined 
under the last undesignated paragraph under the heading ``Administrative 
Provisions'' of chapter V of the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 1982 
(5 U.S.C. 5343 note; 96 Stat. 832) shall be allowed, through appropriate 
employee organization representatives, to participate in wage surveys 
under such paragraph to the same extent as are prevailing rate employees 
under subsection (c)(2) of section 5343 of title 5, United States Code. 
Nothing in

[[Page 121 STAT. 1204]]

such section 5343 shall be construed to affect which agencies are to be 
surveyed under such paragraph.
SEC. 5027. REHABILITATION.

    The Secretary, at Federal expense and in an amount not to exceed 
$1,000,000, shall rehabilitate and improve the water-related 
infrastructure and the transportation infrastructure for the historic 
property in the Anacostia River watershed located in the District of 
Columbia, including measures to address wet weather conditions. To carry 
out this section, the Secretary shall accept funds provided for such 
project under any other Federal program.
SEC. 5028. AUBURN, ALABAMA.

    The Secretary may provide technical assistance relating to water 
supply to Auburn, Alabama. There is authorized to be appropriated 
$5,000,000 to carry out this section.
SEC. 5029. PINHOOK CREEK, HUNTSVILLE, ALABAMA.

    (a) Project Authorization.--The Secretary shall design and construct 
the locally preferred plan for flood protection at Pinhook Creek, 
Huntsville, Alabama. In carrying out the project, the Secretary shall 
utilize, to the extent practicable, the existing detailed project report 
for the project prepared under the authority of section 205 of the Flood 
Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s).
    (b) Participation by Non-Federal Interest.--The Secretary shall 
allow the non-Federal interest to participate in the financing of the 
project in accordance with section 903(c) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4184) if the detailed project report 
evaluation indicates that applying such section is necessary to 
implement the project.
    (c) Credit.--The Secretary shall credit, in accordance with section 
221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), toward the 
non-Federal share of the cost of the project the cost of work carried 
out by the non-Federal interest before the date of the partnership 
agreement for the project.
SEC. 5030. ALASKA.

    Section 570 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 
Stat. 369) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (c) by inserting ``environmental 
        restoration,'' after ``water supply and related facilities,'';
            (2) in subsection (e)(3)(B) by striking the last sentence;
            (3) in subsection (h) by striking ``$25,000,000'' and 
        inserting ``$45,000,000''; and
            (4) by adding at the end the following:

    ``(i) Nonprofit Entities.--In accordance with section 221(b) of the 
Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b(b)), for any project 
carried out under this section, a non-Federal interest may include a 
nonprofit entity with the consent of the affected local government.
    ``(j) Corps of Engineers Expenses.--Not more than 10 percent of the 
amounts appropriated to carry out this section may be used by the Corps 
of Engineers district offices to administer projects under this section 
at Federal expense.''.
SEC. 5031. BARROW, ALASKA.

    The Secretary shall carry out, under section 117 of the Energy and 
Water Development Appropriations Act, 2005 (118 Stat. 2944),

[[Page 121 STAT. 1205]]

a nonstructural project for coastal erosion and storm damage prevention 
and reduction at Barrow, Alaska, including relocation of infrastructure.
SEC. 5032. LOWELL CREEK TUNNEL, SEWARD, ALASKA.

    (a) Long-Term Maintenance and Repair.--
            (1) Maintenance and repair.--The Secretary shall assume 
        responsibility for the long-term maintenance and repair of the 
        Lowell Creek tunnel, Seward, Alaska.
            (2) Duration of responsibilities.--The responsibility of the 
        Secretary for long-term maintenance and repair of the tunnel 
        shall continue until an alternative method of flood diversion is 
        constructed and operational under this section, or 15 years 
        after the date of enactment of this Act, whichever is earlier.

    (b) Study.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine whether 
an alternative method of flood diversion in Lowell Canyon is feasible.
    (c) Construction.--
            (1) Alternative methods.--If the Secretary determines under 
        the study conducted under subsection (b) that an alternative 
        method of flood diversion in Lowell Canyon is feasible, the 
        Secretary shall carry out the alternative method.
            (2) Federal share.--The Federal share of the cost of 
        carrying out an alternative method under paragraph (1) shall be 
        the same as the Federal share of the cost of the construction of 
        the Lowell Creek tunnel.
SEC. 5033. ST. HERMAN AND ST. PAUL HARBORS, KODIAK, ALASKA.

    The Secretary shall carry out, on an emergency basis, necessary 
removal of rubble, sediment, and rock impeding the entrance to the St. 
Herman and St. Paul Harbors, Kodiak, Alaska, at a Federal cost of 
$2,000,000.
SEC. 5034. TANANA RIVER, ALASKA.

    The Secretary shall carry out, on an emergency basis, the removal of 
the hazard to navigation on the Tanana River, Alaska, near the mouth of 
the Chena River, as described in the January 3, 2005, memorandum from 
the Commander, Seventeenth Coast Guard District, to the Corps of 
Engineers, Alaska District, Anchorage, Alaska.
SEC. 5035. WRANGELL HARBOR, ALASKA.

    (a) General Navigation Features.--In carrying out the project for 
navigation, Wrangell Harbor, Alaska, authorized by section 101(b)(1) of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 279), the 
Secretary shall consider the dredging of the mooring basin and 
construction of the inner harbor facilities to be general navigation 
features for purposes of estimating the non-Federal share of project 
costs.
    (b) Revision of Partnership Agreement.--The Secretary shall revise 
the partnership agreement for the project to reflect the change required 
by subsection (a).
SEC. 5036. AUGUSTA AND CLARENDON, ARKANSAS.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary may carry out rehabilitation of 
authorized and completed levees on the White River between Augusta and 
Clarendon, Arkansas, at a total estimated cost of

[[Page 121 STAT. 1206]]

$8,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $5,200,000 and an 
estimated non-Federal cost of $2,800,000.
    (b) Reimbursement.--After performing the rehabilitation under 
subsection (a), the Secretary shall seek reimbursement from the 
Secretary of the Interior of an amount equal to the costs allocated to 
benefits to a Federal wildlife refuge of such rehabilitation.
SEC. 5037. DES ARC LEVEE PROTECTION, ARKANSAS.

    The Secretary shall review the project for flood control, Des Arc, 
Arkansas, to determine whether bank and channel scour along the White 
River threaten the existing project and whether the scour is a result of 
a design deficiency. If the Secretary determines that such conditions 
exist as a result of a deficiency, the Secretary shall carry out 
measures to eliminate the deficiency.
SEC. 5038. LOOMIS LANDING, ARKANSAS.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study of shore damage in the vicinity 
of Loomis Landing, Arkansas, to determine if the damage is the result of 
a Federal navigation project, and, if the Secretary determines that the 
damage is the result of a Federal navigation project, the Secretary 
shall carry out a project to mitigate the damage under section 111 of 
the River and Harbor Act of 1968 (33 U.S.C. 426i).
SEC. 5039. CALIFORNIA.

    (a) Establishment of Program.--The Secretary may establish a program 
to provide environmental assistance to non-Federal interests in 
California.
    (b) Form of Assistance.--Assistance provided under this section may 
be in the form of design and construction assistance for water-related 
environmental infrastructure and resource protection and development 
projects in California, including projects for wastewater treatment and 
related facilities, water supply and related facilities, environmental 
restoration, and surface water resource protection and development.
    (c) Ownership Requirement.--The Secretary may provide assistance for 
a project under this section only if the project is publicly owned.
    (d) Partnership Agreements.--
            (1) In general.--Before providing assistance under this 
        section, the Secretary shall enter into a partnership agreement 
        with a non-Federal interest to provide for design and 
        construction of the project to be carried out with the 
        assistance.
            (2) Requirements.--Each partnership agreement for a project 
        entered into under this subsection shall provide for the 
        following:
                    (A) Plan.--Development by the Secretary, in 
                consultation with appropriate Federal and State 
                officials, of a facilities or resource protection and 
                development plan, including appropriate engineering 
                plans and specifications.
                    (B) Legal and institutional structures.--
                Establishment of such legal and institutional structures 
                as are necessary to ensure the effective long-term 
                operation of the project by the non-Federal interest.
            (3) Cost sharing.--
                    (A) In general.--The Federal share of the cost of a 
                project under this section--

[[Page 121 STAT. 1207]]

                          (i) shall be 75 percent; and
                          (ii) may be provided in the form of grants or 
                      reimbursements of project costs.
                    (B) Credit for work.--The Secretary shall credit, in 
                accordance with section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 
                1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), toward the non-Federal share 
                of the cost of the project the cost of design work 
                carried out by the non-Federal interest for the project 
                before the date of the partnership agreement for the 
                project.
                    (C) Credit for interest.--In case of a delay in the 
                funding of the non-Federal share of the costs of a 
                project that is the subject of an agreement under this 
                section, the non-Federal interest shall receive credit 
                for reasonable interest incurred in providing the non-
                Federal share.
                    (D) Credit for land, easements, and rights-of-way.--
                The non-Federal interest shall receive credit for land, 
                easements, rights-of-way, and relocations toward the 
                non-Federal share of project costs (including all 
                reasonable costs associated with obtaining permits 
                necessary for the construction, operation, and 
                maintenance of the project on publicly owned or 
                controlled land), but the credit may not exceed 25 
                percent of total project costs.
                    (E) Operation and maintenance.--The non-Federal 
                share of operation and maintenance costs for projects 
                constructed with assistance provided under this section 
                shall be 100 percent.

    (e) Applicability of Other Federal and State Laws.--Nothing in this 
section shall be construed to waive, limit, or otherwise affect the 
applicability of any provision of Federal or State law that would 
otherwise apply to a project to be carried out with assistance provided 
under this section.
    (f) Nonprofit Entities.--In accordance with section 221(b) of the 
Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b(b)), for any project 
carried out under this section, a non-Federal interest may include a 
nonprofit entity.
    (g) Corps of Engineers Expenses.--Not more than 10 percent of 
amounts made available to carry out this section may be used by the 
Corps of Engineers district offices to administer projects under this 
section at Federal expense.
    (h) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $40,000,000.
SEC. 5040. CALAVERAS RIVER AND LITTLEJOHN CREEK AND TRIBUTARIES, 
                          STOCKTON, CALIFORNIA.

    (a) <<NOTE: Deadline.>> In General.--Unless the Secretary 
determines, by not later than 30 days after the date of enactment of 
this Act, that the relocation of the portion of the project described in 
subsection (b)(2) would be injurious to the public interest, a non-
Federal interest may reconstruct and relocate that portion of the 
project approximately 300 feet in a westerly direction.

    (b) Project Description.--
            (1) In general.--The project referred to in subsection (a) 
        is the project for flood control, Calaveras River and Littlejohn 
        Creek and tributaries, California, authorized by section 10 of 
        the Flood Control Act of December 22, 1944 (58 Stat. 902).
            (2) Specific description.--The portion of the project to be 
        reconstructed and relocated is that portion consisting of

[[Page 121 STAT. 1208]]

        approximately 5.34 acres of dry land levee beginning at a point 
        N. 2203542.3167, E. 6310930.1385, thence running west about 
        59.99 feet to a point N. 2203544.6562, E. 6310870.1468, thence 
        running south about 3,874.99 feet to a point N. 2199669.8760, E. 
        6310861.7956, thence running east about 60.00 feet to a point N. 
        2199668.8026, E. 6310921.7900, thence running north about 
        3,873.73 feet to the point of origin.

    (c) Cost Sharing.--The non-Federal share of the cost of 
reconstructing and relocating the portion of the project described in 
subsection (b)(2) shall be 100 percent.
SEC. 5041. CAMBRIA, CALIFORNIA.

    Section 219(f)(48) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1992 <<NOTE: 106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 335.>> (114 Stat. 2763A-220) is 
amended--
            (1) by striking ``$10,300,000'' and inserting the following:
                    ``(A) In general.--$10,300,000'';
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(B) Credit.--The Secretary shall credit, in 
                accordance with section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 
                1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), toward the non-Federal share 
                of the cost of the project not to exceed $3,000,000 for 
                the cost of planning and design work carried out by the 
                non-Federal interest for the project before the date of 
                the partnership agreement for the project.''; and
            (3) by aligning the remainder of the text of subparagraph 
        (A) (as designated by paragraph (1) of this section) with 
        subparagraph (B) (as added by paragraph (2) of this section).
SEC. 5042. CONTRA COSTA CANAL, OAKLEY AND KNIGHTSEN, CALIFORNIA; 
                          MALLARD SLOUGH, PITTSBURG, CALIFORNIA.

    Sections 512 and 514 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 
(114 Stat. 2650) are each amended by adding at the end the following: 
``All planning, study, design, and construction on the project shall be 
carried out by the office of the district engineer, San Francisco, 
California.''.
SEC. 5043. <<NOTE: Study.>> DANA POINT HARBOR, CALIFORNIA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study of the causes of water quality 
degradation within Dana Point Harbor, California, to determine if the 
degradation is the result of a Federal navigation project, and, if the 
Secretary determines that the degradation is the result of a Federal 
navigation project, the Secretary shall carry out a project to mitigate 
the degradation at Federal expense.
SEC. 5044. EAST SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.

    Section 219(f)(22) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1992 <<NOTE: 106 Stat. 4835.>> (113 Stat. 336) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``$25,000,000'' and inserting the following:
                    ``(A) In general.--$25,000,000'';
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(B) Credit.--The Secretary shall credit, in 
                accordance with section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 
                1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), toward the non-Federal share 
                of the cost of the project the cost of design and 
                construction work carried out by the non-Federal 
                interest for the project before the date of the 
                partnership agreement for the project.
                    ``(C) In-kind contributions.--The non-Federal 
                interest may provide any portion of the non-Federal 
                share

[[Page 121 STAT. 1209]]

                of the cost of the project in the form of in-kind 
                services and materials.''; and
            (3) by aligning the remainder of the text of subparagraph 
        (A) (as designated by paragraph (1) of this section) with 
        subparagraph (B) (as added by paragraph (2) of this section).
SEC. 5045. EASTERN SANTA CLARA BASIN, CALIFORNIA.

    Section 111(c) of the Miscellaneous Appropriations Act, 2001 (as 
enacted into law by Public Law 106-554; 114 Stat. 2763A-224) is 
amended--
            (1) by striking ``$25,000,000'' and inserting 
        ``$28,000,000''; and
            (2) by striking ``$7,000,000'' and inserting 
        ``$10,000,000''.
SEC. 5046. LA-3 DREDGED MATERIAL OCEAN DISPOSAL SITE DESIGNATION, 
                          CALIFORNIA.

    The third sentence of section 102(c)(4) of the Marine Protection, 
Research, and Sanctuaries Act of 1972 (33 U.S.C. 1412(c)(4)) is amended 
by striking ``January 1, 2003'' and inserting ``January 1, 2011''.
SEC. 5047. LANCASTER, CALIFORNIA.

    Section 219(f)(50) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 
(114 Stat. 2763A-220) <<NOTE: 106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 335.>> is 
amended--
            (1) by inserting after ``water'' the following: ``and 
        wastewater''; and
            (2) by striking ``$14,500,000'' and inserting 
        ``$24,500,000''.
SEC. 5048. LOS OSOS, CALIFORNIA.

    Section 219(c)(27) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 
(114 Stat. 2763A-219) <<NOTE: 106 Stat. 4835.>> is amended to read as 
follows:
            ``(27) Los osos, california.--Wastewater infrastructure, Los 
        Osos, California.''.
SEC. 5049. PINE FLAT DAM FISH AND WILDLIFE HABITAT, CALIFORNIA.

    (a) Cooperative Program.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary shall participate with 
        appropriate State and local agencies in the implementation of a 
        cooperative program to improve and manage fisheries and aquatic 
        habitat conditions in Pine Flat Reservoir and in the 14-mile 
        reach of the Kings River immediately below Pine Flat Dam, 
        California, in a manner that--
                    (A) provides for long-term aquatic resource 
                enhancement; and
                    (B) avoids adverse effects on water storage and 
                water rights holders.
            (2) Goals and principles.--The cooperative program described 
        in paragraph (1) shall be carried out--
                    (A) substantially in accordance with the goals and 
                principles of the document entitled ``Kings River 
                Fisheries Management Program Framework Agreement'' and 
                dated May 29, 1999, between the California department of 
                fish and game and the Kings River Water Association and 
                the Kings River Conservation District; and
                    (B) in cooperation with the parties to that 
                agreement.

    (b) Participation by Secretary.--

[[Page 121 STAT. 1210]]

            (1) In general.--In furtherance of the goals of the 
        agreement described in subsection (a)(2), the Secretary shall 
        participate in the planning, design, and construction of 
        projects and pilot projects on the Kings River and its 
        tributaries to enhance aquatic habitat and water availability 
        for fisheries purposes (including maintenance of a trout 
        fishery) in accordance with flood control operations, water 
        rights, and beneficial uses in existence as of the date of 
        enactment of this Act.
            (2) Projects.--Projects referred to in paragraph (1) may 
        include--
                    (A) projects to construct or improve pumping, 
                conveyance, and storage facilities to enhance water 
                transfers; and
                    (B) projects to carry out water exchanges and create 
                opportunities to use floodwater within and downstream of 
                Pine Flat Reservoir.

    (c) No Authorization of Certain Dam-Related Projects.--Nothing in 
this section shall be construed to authorize any project for the raising 
of Pine Flat Dam or the construction of a multilevel intake structure at 
Pine Flat Dam.
    (d) Use of Existing Studies.--In carrying out this section, the 
Secretary shall use, to the maximum extent practicable, studies in 
existence on the date of enactment of this Act, including data and 
environmental documentation in the document entitled ``Final Feasibility 
Report and Report of the Chief of Engineers for Pine Flat Dam Fish and 
Wildlife Habitat Restoration'' and dated July 19, 2002.
    (e) Credit for Land, Easements, and Rights-of-Way.--The Secretary 
shall credit toward the non-Federal share of the cost of construction of 
any project under subsection (b) the value, regardless of the date of 
acquisition, of any land, easements, rights-of-way, dredged material 
disposal areas, or relocations provided by the non-Federal interest for 
use in carrying out the project.
    (f) Operation and Maintenance.--The operation, maintenance, repair, 
rehabilitation, and replacement of projects carried out under this 
section shall be a non-Federal responsibility.
    (g) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $20,000,000. Such sums shall 
remain available until expended.
SEC. 5050. RAYMOND BASIN, SIX BASINS, CHINO BASIN, AND SAN GABRIEL 
                          BASIN, CALIFORNIA.

    (a) Comprehensive Plan.--The Secretary, in consultation and 
coordination with appropriate Federal, State, and local entities, shall 
develop a comprehensive plan for the management of water resources in 
the Raymond Basin, Six Basins, Chino Basin, and San Gabriel Basin, 
California. The Secretary may carry out activities identified in the 
comprehensive plan to demonstrate practicable alternatives for water 
resources management.
    (b) Operation and Maintenance.--The non-Federal share of the cost of 
operation and maintenance of any measures constructed under this section 
shall be 100 percent.
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $5,000,000.
SEC. 5051. SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary, in cooperation with the Port of San 
Francisco, California, may carry out the project for repair

[[Page 121 STAT. 1211]]

and removal, as appropriate, of Piers 30-32, 35, 36, 70 (including 
Wharves 7 and 8), and 80 in San Francisco, California, substantially in 
accordance with the Port's redevelopment plan.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriation.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated $25,000,000 to carry out this section.
SEC. 5052. <<NOTE: 33 USC 59h-1.>> SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA, 
                          WATERFRONT AREA.

    (a) Area to Be Declared Nonnavigable; Public Interest.--Unless the 
Secretary finds, after consultation with local and regional public 
officials (including local and regional public planning organizations), 
that the proposed projects to be undertaken within the boundaries of the 
portion of the San Francisco, California, waterfront area described in 
subsection (b) are not in the public interest, such portion is declared 
to be nonnavigable waters of the United States.
    (b) Northern Embarcadero South of Bryant Street.--The portion of the 
San Francisco, California, waterfront area referred to in subsection (a) 
is as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the northeasterly 
prolongation of that portion of the northwesterly line of Bryant Street 
lying between Beale Street and Main Street with the southwesterly line 
of Spear Street, which intersection lies on the line of jurisdiction of 
the San Francisco Port Commission; following thence southerly along said 
line of jurisdiction as described in the State of California Harbor and 
Navigation Code Section 1770, as amended in 1961, to its intersection 
with the southeasterly line of Townsend Street; thence northeasterly 
along said southeasterly line of Townsend Street, to its intersection 
with a line that is parallel and distant 10 feet southerly from the 
existing southern boundary of Pier 40 produced; thence easterly along 
said parallel line, to its point of intersection with the United States 
Government Pierhead line; thence northerly along said Pierhead line to 
its intersection with a line parallel with, and distant 10 feet easterly 
from, the existing easterly boundary line of Pier 30-32; thence 
northerly along said parallel line and its northerly prolongation, to a 
point of intersection with a line parallel with, and distant 10 feet 
northerly from, the existing northerly boundary of Pier 30-32; thence 
westerly along last said parallel line to its intersection with the 
United States Government Pierhead line; thence northerly along said 
Pierhead line, to its intersection aforementioned northwesterly line of 
Bryant Street produced northeasterly; thence southwesterly along said 
northwesterly line of Bryant Street produced to the point of beginning.
    (c) Requirement That Area Be Improved.--The declaration of 
nonnavigability under subsection (a) applies only to those parts of the 
area described in subsection (b) that are or will be bulkheaded, filled, 
or otherwise occupied by permanent structures and does not affect the 
applicability of any Federal statute or regulation applicable to such 
parts the day before the date of enactment of this Act, including 
sections 9 and 10 of the Act of March 3, 1899 (33 U.S.C. 401 and 403; 30 
Stat. 1151), commonly known as the Rivers and Harbors Appropriation Act 
of 1899, section 404 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 
U.S.C. 1344), and the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 
U.S.C. 4321 et seq.).
    (d) <<NOTE: Deadline.>> Expiration Date.--If, 20 years from the date 
of enactment of this Act, any area or part thereof described in 
subsection (b) is not bulkheaded or filled or occupied by permanent 
structures,

[[Page 121 STAT. 1212]]

including marina facilities, in accordance with the requirements set out 
in subsection (c), or if work in connection with any activity permitted 
in subsection (c) is not commenced within 5 years after issuance of such 
permits, then the declaration of nonnavigability for such area or part 
thereof shall expire.
SEC. 5053. SAN PABLO BAY, CALIFORNIA, WATERSHED AND SUISUN MARSH 
                          ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION.

    (a) San Pablo Bay Watershed, California.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary shall complete work, as 
        expeditiously as possible, on the ongoing San Pablo Bay 
        watershed, California, study to determine the feasibility of 
        opportunities for restoring, preserving, and protecting the San 
        Pablo Bay watershed.
            (2) Report.--Not later than March 31, 2008, the Secretary 
        shall submit to Congress a report on the results of the study.

    (b) <<NOTE: Study.>> Suisun Marsh, California.--The Secretary shall 
conduct a comprehensive study to determine the feasibility of 
opportunities for restoring, preserving, and protecting the Suisun 
Marsh, California.

    (c) San Pablo and Suisun Bay Marsh Watershed Critical Restoration 
Projects.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary may participate in critical 
        restoration projects that will produce, consistent with Federal 
        programs, projects, and activities, immediate and substantial 
        ecosystem restoration, preservation, and protection benefits in 
        the following sub-watersheds of the San Pablo and Suisun Bay 
        Marsh watersheds:
                    (A) The tidal areas of the Petaluma River, Napa-
                Sonoma Marsh.
                    (B) The shoreline of West Contra Costa County.
                    (C) Novato Creek.
                    (D) Suisun Marsh.
                    (E) Gallinas-Miller Creek.
            (2) Types of assistance.--Participation in critical 
        restoration projects under this subsection may include 
        assistance for planning, design, or construction.

    (d) Credit.--In accordance with section 221 of the Flood Control Act 
of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), the Secretary shall credit toward the non-
Federal share of the cost of construction of a project under this 
section--
            (1) the value of any lands, easements, rights-of-way, 
        dredged material disposal areas, or relocations provided by the 
        non-Federal interest for carrying out the project, regardless of 
        the date of acquisition;
            (2) funds received from the CALFED Bay-Delta program; and
            (3) the cost of the studies, design, and construction work 
        carried out by the non-Federal interest before the date of the 
        partnership agreement for the project.

    (e) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $40,000,000.
SEC. 5054. ST. HELENA, CALIFORNIA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary may construct a project for flood 
control and environmental restoration, St. Helena, California, 
substantially in accordance with the plan for the St. Helena 
comprehensive flood protection project dated 2006 and described in

[[Page 121 STAT. 1213]]

the addendum dated June 27, 2006, to the report prepared by the city of 
St. Helena entitled ``City of St. Helena Comprehensive Flood Protection 
Project, Final Environmental Impact Report'', and dated January 2004, if 
the Secretary determines that the plans and designs for the project are 
feasible.
    (b) Cost.--The total cost of the project to be constructed pursuant 
to subsection (a) shall be $30,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost 
of $19,500,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $10,500,000.
    (c) Reimbursement.--The non-Federal interest shall be reimbursed for 
any work performed by the non-Federal interest for the project described 
in subsection (a) that is in excess of the required non-Federal 
contribution toward the total cost of the project, if the Secretary 
determines that the work is integral to the project.
SEC. 5055. UPPER CALAVERAS RIVER, STOCKTON, CALIFORNIA.

    (a) Reevaluation.--The Secretary shall reevaluate the feasibility of 
the Lower Mosher Slough element and the levee extensions on the Upper 
Calaveras River element of the project for flood control, Stockton 
Metropolitan Area, California, carried out under section 211(f)(3) of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3683), to 
determine the eligibility of such elements for reimbursement under 
section 211 of such Act (33 U.S.C. 701b-13).
    (b) Special Rules for Reevaluation.--In conducting the reevaluation 
under subsection (a), the Secretary shall not reject a feasibility 
determination based on one or more of the policies of the Corps of 
Engineers concerning the frequency of flooding, the drainage area, and 
the amount of runoff.
    (c) Reimbursement.--If the Secretary determines that the elements 
referred to subsection (a) are feasible, the Secretary shall reimburse, 
subject to appropriations, the non-Federal interest under section 211 of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 for the Federal share of the 
cost of such elements.
SEC. 5056. RIO GRANDE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM, COLORADO, 
                          NEW MEXICO, AND TEXAS.

    (a) Definitions.--In this section, the following definitions apply:
            (1) Rio grande compact.--The term ``Rio Grande Compact'' 
        means the compact approved by Congress under the Act of May 31, 
        1939 (53 Stat. 785), and ratified by the States.
            (2) Rio grande basin.--The term ``Rio Grande Basin'' means 
        the Rio Grande (including all tributaries and their headwaters) 
        located--
                    (A) in the State of Colorado, from the Rio Grande 
                Reservoir, near Creede, Colorado, to the New Mexico 
                State border;
                    (B) in the State of New Mexico, from the Colorado 
                State border downstream to the Texas State border; and
                    (C) in the State of Texas, from the New Mexico State 
                border to the southern terminus of the Rio Grande at the 
                Gulf of Mexico.
            (3) States.--The term ``States'' means the States of 
        Colorado, New Mexico, and Texas.

    (b) Program Authority.--

[[Page 121 STAT. 1214]]

            (1) In general.--The Secretary shall carry out, in the Rio 
        Grande Basin--
                    (A) a program for the planning, construction, and 
                evaluation of measures for fish and wildlife habitat 
                rehabilitation and enhancement; and
                    (B) implementation of a long-term monitoring, 
                computerized data inventory and analysis, applied 
                research, and adaptive management program.
            (2) Reports.--Not later than December 31, 2008, and not 
        later than December 31 of every sixth year thereafter, the 
        Secretary, in consultation with the Secretary of the Interior 
        and the States, shall submit to Congress a report that--
                    (A) contains an evaluation of the programs described 
                in paragraph (1);
                    (B) describes the accomplishments of each program;
                    (C) provides updates of a systemic habitat needs 
                assessment; and
                    (D) identifies any needed adjustments in the 
                authorization of the programs.

    (c) State and Local Consultation and Cooperative Effort.--For the 
purpose of ensuring the coordinated planning and implementation of the 
programs described in subsection (b), the Secretary shall--
            (1) consult with the States, and other appropriate entities 
        in the States, the rights and interests of which might be 
        affected by specific program activities; and
            (2) enter into an interagency agreement with the Secretary 
        of the Interior to provide for the direct participation of, and 
        transfer of funds to, the United States Fish and Wildlife 
        Service and any other agency or bureau of the Department of the 
        Interior for the planning, design, implementation, and 
        evaluation of those programs.

    (d) Operation and Maintenance.--The costs of operation and 
maintenance of a project located on Federal land, or land owned or 
operated by a State or local government, shall be borne by the Federal, 
State, or local agency that has jurisdiction over fish and wildlife 
activities on the land.
    (e) Effect on Other Law.--
            (1) Water law.--Nothing in this section shall be construed 
        to preempt any State water law.
            (2) Compacts and decrees.--In carrying out this section, the 
        Secretary shall comply with the Rio Grande Compact, and any 
        applicable court decrees or Federal and State laws, affecting 
        water or water rights in the Rio Grande Basin.

    (f) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to the Secretary to carry out this section $15,000,000 for 
each of fiscal years 2008 through 2011.
SEC. 5057. <<NOTE: Designation.>> CHARLES HERVEY TOWNSHEND 
                          BREAKWATER, NEW HAVEN HARBOR, 
                          CONNECTICUT.

    The western breakwater for the project for navigation, New Haven 
Harbor, Connecticut, authorized by the first section of the Act of 
September 19, 1890 (26 Stat. 428), shall be known and designated as the 
``Charles Hervey Townshend Breakwater''.

[[Page 121 STAT. 1215]]

SEC. 5058. STAMFORD, CONNECTICUT.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary may participate in the ecosystem 
restoration, navigation, flood damage reduction, and recreation 
components of the Mill River and Long Island Sound revitalization 
project, Stamford, Connecticut.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated $10,000,000 to carry out this section.
SEC. 5059. <<NOTE: 16 USC 3801 note.>> DELMARVA CONSERVATION 
                          CORRIDOR, DELAWARE, MARYLAND, AND 
                          VIRGINIA.

    (a) Assistance.--The Secretary may provide technical assistance to 
the Secretary of Agriculture for use in carrying out the Conservation 
Corridor Demonstration Program established under subtitle G of title II 
of the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002 (16 U.S.C. 3801 
note; 116 Stat. 275).
    (b) Coordination and Integration.--In carrying out water resources 
projects in the States on the Delmarva Peninsula, the Secretary shall 
coordinate and integrate those projects, to the maximum extent 
practicable, with any activities carried out to implement a conservation 
corridor plan approved by the Secretary of Agriculture under section 
2602 of the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002 (16 U.S.C. 
3801 note; 116 Stat. 275).
SEC. 5060. ANACOSTIA RIVER, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA AND MARYLAND.

    (a) <<NOTE: Deadline. Public information.>> Comprehensive Action 
Plan.--Not later than one year after the date of enactment of this Act, 
the Secretary, in coordination with the Mayor of the District of 
Columbia, the Governor of Maryland, the county executives of Montgomery 
County and Prince George's County, Maryland, and other interested 
entities, shall develop and make available to the public a 10-year 
comprehensive action plan to provide for the restoration and protection 
of the ecological integrity of the Anacostia River and its tributaries.

    (b) Public Availability.--On completion of the comprehensive action 
plan under subsection (a), the Secretary shall make the plan available 
to the public, including on the Internet.
SEC. 5061. EAST CENTRAL AND NORTHEAST FLORIDA.

    (a) East Central and Northeast Florida Region Defined.--In this 
section, the term ``East Central and Northeast Florida Region'' means 
Flagler County, St. Johns County, Putman County (east of the St. Johns 
River), Seminole County, Volusia County, the towns of Winter Park, 
Maitland, and Palatka, Florida.
    (b) Establishment of Program.--The Secretary may establish a program 
to provide environmental assistance to non-Federal interests in the East 
Central and Northeast Florida Region.
    (c) Form of Assistance.--Assistance provided under this section may 
be in the form of design and construction assistance for water-related 
environmental infrastructure and resource protection and development 
projects in the East Central and Northeast Florida Region, including 
projects for wastewater treatment and related facilities, water supply 
and related facilities, environmental restoration, and surface water 
resource protection and development.
    (d) Ownership Requirement.--The Secretary may provide assistance for 
a project under this section only if the project is publicly owned.
    (e) Partnership Agreements.--

[[Page 121 STAT. 1216]]

            (1) In general.--Before providing assistance under this 
        section, the Secretary shall enter into a partnership agreement 
        with a non-Federal interest to provide for design and 
        construction of the project to be carried out with the 
        assistance.
            (2) Requirements.--Each partnership agreement for a project 
        entered into under this subsection shall provide for the 
        following:
                    (A) Plan.--Development by the Secretary, in 
                consultation with appropriate Federal and State 
                officials, of a facilities or resource protection and 
                development plan, including appropriate engineering 
                plans and specifications.
                    (B) Legal and institutional structures.--
                Establishment of such legal and institutional structures 
                as are necessary to ensure the effective long-term 
                operation of the project by the non-Federal interest.
            (3) Cost sharing.--
                    (A) In general.--The Federal share of the cost of a 
                project under this section--
                          (i) shall be 75 percent; and
                          (ii) may be provided in the form of grants or 
                      reimbursements of project costs.
                    (B) Credit for work.--The Secretary shall credit, in 
                accordance with section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 
                1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), toward the non-Federal share 
                of the cost of the project the cost of design work 
                carried out by the non-Federal interest for the project 
                before the date of the partnership agreement for the 
                project.
                    (C) Credit for interest.--In case of a delay in the 
                funding of the non-Federal share of the costs of a 
                project that is the subject of an agreement under this 
                section, the non-Federal interest shall receive credit 
                for reasonable interest incurred in providing the non-
                Federal share.
                    (D) Credit for land, easements, and rights-of-way.--
                The non-Federal interest shall receive credit for land, 
                easements, rights-of-way, and relocations toward the 
                non-Federal share of project costs (including all 
                reasonable costs associated with obtaining permits 
                necessary for the construction, operation, and 
                maintenance of the project on publicly owned or 
                controlled land), but the credit may not exceed 25 
                percent of total project costs.
                    (E) Operation and maintenance.--The non-Federal 
                share of operation and maintenance costs for projects 
                constructed with assistance provided under this section 
                shall be 100 percent.

    (f) Applicability of Other Federal and State Laws.--Nothing in this 
section shall be construed to waive, limit, or otherwise affect the 
applicability of any provision of Federal or State law that would 
otherwise apply to a project to be carried out with assistance provided 
under this section.
    (g) Nonprofit Entities.--In accordance with section 221(b) of the 
Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b(b)), for any project 
carried out under this section, a non-Federal interest may include a 
nonprofit entity with the consent of the affected local government.
    (h) Corps of Engineers Expenses.--Not more than 10 percent of the 
amounts appropriated to carry out this section may be

[[Page 121 STAT. 1217]]

used by the Corps of Engineers district offices to administer projects 
under this section at Federal expense.
    (i) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $40,000,000.
SEC. 5062. FLORIDA KEYS WATER QUALITY IMPROVEMENTS.

    Section 109 of the Miscellaneous Appropriations Act, 2001 (enacted 
into law by Public Law 106-554) (114 Stat. 2763A-222) is amended--
            (1) by adding at the end of subsection (e)(2) the following:
                    ``(C) Credit for work prior to execution of the 
                partnership agreement.--The Secretary shall credit 
                toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the 
                project--
                          ``(i) in accordance with section 221 of the 
                      Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), 
                      the cost of construction work carried out by the 
                      non-Federal interest for the project before the 
                      date of the partnership agreement for the project; 
                      and
                          ``(ii) the cost of land acquisition carried 
                      out by the non-Federal interest for projects to be 
                      carried out under this section.''; and
            (2) in subsection (f) by striking ``$100,000,000'' and 
        inserting ``$100,000,000, of which not more than $15,000,000 may 
        be used to provide planning, design, and construction assistance 
        to the Florida Keys Aqueduct Authority for a water treatment 
        plant, Florida City, Florida''.
SEC. 5063. LAKE WORTH, FLORIDA.

    The Secretary may carry out necessary repairs for the Lake Worth 
bulkhead replacement project, West Palm Beach, Florida, at an estimated 
total cost of $9,000,000.
SEC. 5064. BIG CREEK, GEORGIA, WATERSHED MANAGEMENT AND 
                          RESTORATION PROGRAM.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary may cooperate with, by providing 
technical, planning, and construction assistance to, the city of 
Roswell, Georgia, as the non-Federal interest and coordinator with other 
local governments in the Big Creek watershed, Georgia, to assess the 
quality and quantity of water resources, conduct comprehensive watershed 
management planning, develop and implement water efficiency technologies 
and programs, and plan, design, and construct water resource facilities 
to restore the watershed.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to the Secretary $5,000,000 to carry out this section.
SEC. 5065. METROPOLITAN NORTH GEORGIA WATER PLANNING DISTRICT.

    (a) Establishment of Program.--The Secretary shall establish a 
program to provide environmental assistance to non-Federal interests in 
the Metropolitan North Georgia Water Planning District.
    (b) Form of Assistance.--Assistance provided under this section may 
be in the form of design and construction assistance for water-related 
environmental infrastructure and resource protection and development 
projects in north Georgia, including projects

[[Page 121 STAT. 1218]]

for wastewater treatment and related facilities, elimination or control 
of combined sewer overflows, water supply and related facilities, 
environmental restoration, and surface water resource protection and 
development.
    (c) Ownership Requirement.--The Secretary may provide assistance for 
a project under this section only if the project is publicly owned.
    (d) Partnership Agreements.--
            (1) In general.--Before providing assistance under this 
        section, the Secretary shall enter into a partnership agreement 
        with a non-Federal interest to provide for design and 
        construction of the project to be carried out with the 
        assistance.
            (2) Requirements.--Each partnership agreement for a project 
        entered into under this subsection shall provide for the 
        following:
                    (A) Plan.--Development by the Secretary, in 
                consultation with appropriate Federal and State 
                officials, of a facilities or resource protection and 
                development plan, including appropriate engineering 
                plans and specifications.
                    (B) Legal and institutional structures.--
                Establishment of such legal and institutional structures 
                as are necessary to ensure the effective long-term 
                operation of the project by the non-Federal interest.
            (3) Cost sharing.--
                    (A) In general.--The Federal share of the cost of a 
                project under this section--
                          (i) shall be 75 percent; and
                          (ii) may be provided in the form of grants or 
                      reimbursements of project costs.
                    (B) Credit for work.--The Secretary shall credit, in 
                accordance with section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 
                1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), toward the non-Federal share 
                of the cost of a project under this section, in an 
                amount not to exceed 6 percent of the total construction 
                costs of the project, the cost of design work carried 
                out by the non-Federal interest for the project before 
                the date of the partnership agreement for the project.
                    (C) Credit for interest.--In case of a delay in the 
                funding of the non-Federal share of the costs of a 
                project that is the subject of an agreement under this 
                section, the non-Federal interest shall receive credit 
                for reasonable interest incurred in providing the non-
                Federal share.
                    (D) Credit for land, easements, and rights-of-way.--
                The non-Federal interest shall receive credit for land, 
                easements, rights-of-way, and relocations toward the 
                non-Federal share of project costs (including all 
                reasonable costs associated with obtaining permits 
                necessary for the construction, operation, and 
                maintenance of the project on publicly owned or 
                controlled land), but the credit may not exceed 25 
                percent of total project costs.
                    (E) Operation and maintenance.--The non-Federal 
                share of operation and maintenance costs for projects 
                constructed with assistance provided under this section 
                shall be 100 percent.

    (e) Applicability of Other Federal and State Laws.--Nothing in this 
section shall be construed to waive, limit, or otherwise affect the 
applicability of any provision of Federal or State

[[Page 121 STAT. 1219]]

law that would otherwise apply to a project to be carried out with 
assistance provided under this section.
    (f) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $20,000,000.
SEC. 5066. SAVANNAH, GEORGIA.

    (a) In General.--After completion of a Savannah Riverfront plan, the 
Secretary may participate in the ecosystem restoration, recreation, 
navigation, and flood damage reduction components of the plan.
    (b) Coordination.--In carrying out this section, the Secretary shall 
coordinate with appropriate representatives in the vicinity of Savannah, 
Georgia, including the Georgia Ports Authority, the city of Savannah, 
and Camden County.
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated $10,000,000 to carry out this section.
SEC. 5067. IDAHO, MONTANA, RURAL NEVADA, NEW MEXICO, RURAL UTAH, 
                          AND WYOMING.

    Section 595 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 
Stat. 383; 117 Stat. 139; 117 Stat. 142; 117 Stat. 1836; 118 Stat. 440) 
is amended--
            (1) in the section heading by striking ``and rural utah'' 
        and inserting ``rural utah, and wyoming'';
            (2) in subsections (b) and (c) by striking ``and rural 
        Utah'' each place it appears and inserting ``rural Utah, and 
        Wyoming''; and
            (3) by striking subsection (h) and inserting the following:

    ``(h) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section for the period beginning with 
fiscal year 2001 $150,000,000 for rural Nevada, $25,000,000 for each of 
Montana and New Mexico, $55,000,000 for Idaho, $50,000,000 for rural 
Utah, and $30,000,000 for Wyoming. Such sums shall remain available 
until expended.''.
SEC. 5068. RILEY CREEK RECREATION AREA, IDAHO.

    The Secretary is authorized to carry out the Riley Creek Recreation 
Area Operation Plan of the Albeni Falls Management Plan, dated October 
2001, for the Riley Creek Recreation Area, Albeni Falls Dam, Bonner 
County, Idaho.
SEC. 5069. FLOODPLAIN MAPPING, LITTLE CALUMET RIVER, CHICAGO, 
                          ILLINOIS.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall provide assistance for a 
project to develop maps identifying 100- and 500-year flood inundation 
areas along the Little Calumet River, Chicago, Illinois.
    (b) Requirements.--Maps developed under the project shall include 
hydrologic and hydraulic information and shall accurately show the flood 
inundation of each property by flood risk in the floodplain. The maps 
shall be produced in a high resolution format and shall be made 
available to all flood prone areas along the Little Calumet River, 
Chicago, Illinois, in an electronic format.
    (c) Participation of FEMA.--The Secretary and the non-Federal 
interests for the project shall work with the Administrator of the 
Federal Emergency Management Agency to ensure the validity of the maps 
developed under the project for flood insurance purposes.

[[Page 121 STAT. 1220]]

    (d) Forms of Assistance.--In carrying out the project, the Secretary 
may enter into contracts or cooperative agreements with the non-Federal 
interests or provide reimbursements of project costs.
    (e) Federal Share.--The Federal share of the cost of the project 
shall be 50 percent.
    (f) Limitation on Statutory Construction.--Nothing in this section 
shall be construed to modify the prioritization of map updates or the 
substantive requirements of the Federal Emergency Management Agency 
flood map modernization program authorized by section 1360 of the 
National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 4101).
    (g) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $2,000,000.
SEC. 5070. RECONSTRUCTION OF ILLINOIS AND MISSOURI FLOOD 
                          PROTECTION PROJECTS.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary may participate in the reconstruction 
of an eligible flood control project if the Secretary determines that 
such reconstruction is not required as a result of improper operation 
and maintenance of the project by the non-Federal interest.
    (b) Cost Sharing.--The non-Federal share of the costs for the 
reconstruction of a flood control project authorized by this section 
shall be the same non-Federal share that was applicable to construction 
of the project. The non-Federal interest shall be responsible for 
operation and maintenance and repair of a project for which 
reconstruction is undertaken under this section.
    (c) Reconstruction Defined.--In this section, the term 
``reconstruction'', as used with respect to a project, means addressing 
major project deficiencies caused by long-term degradation of the 
foundation, construction materials, or engineering systems or components 
of the project, the results of which render the project at risk of not 
performing in compliance with its authorized project purposes. In 
addressing such deficiencies, the Secretary may incorporate current 
design standards and efficiency improvements, including the replacement 
of obsolete mechanical and electrical components at pumping stations, if 
such incorporation does not significantly change the scope, function, 
and purpose of the project as authorized.
    (d) Eligible Projects.--The following flood control projects are 
eligible for reconstruction under this section:
            (1) Clear Creek Drainage and Levee District, Illinois.
            (2) Fort Chartres and Ivy Landing Drainage District, 
        Illinois.
            (3) Prairie Du Pont Levee and Sanitary District, including 
        Fish Lake Drainage and Levee District, Illinois.
            (4) Cairo, Illinois Mainline Levee, Cairo, Illinois.
            (5) Goose Pond Pump Station, Cairo, Illinois.
            (6) Cottonwood Slough Pump Station, Alexander County, 
        Illinois.
            (7) 10th and 28th Street Pump Stations, Cairo, Illinois.
            (8) Flood control levee projects in Brookport, Shawneetown, 
        Old Shawneetown, Golconda, Rosiclare, Harrisburg, and 
        Reevesville, Illinois.
            (9) City of St. Louis, Missouri.
            (10) Missouri River Levee Drainage District, Missouri.

[[Page 121 STAT. 1221]]

    (e) Justification.--The reconstruction of a project authorized by 
this section shall not be considered a separable element of the project.
    (f) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated $50,000,000 to carry out this section.
SEC. 5071. ILLINOIS RIVER BASIN RESTORATION.

    (a) Extension of Authorization.--Section 519(c)(2) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2654) is amended by 
striking ``2004'' and inserting ``2010''.
    (b) Maximum Federal Share.--Section 519(c)(3) of such Act (114 Stat. 
2654) is amended by striking ``$5,000,000'' and inserting 
``$20,000,000''.
    (c) In-Kind Services.--Section 519(g)(3) of such Act (114 Stat. 
2655) is amended by inserting before the period at the end of the first 
sentence ``if such services are provided not more than 5 years before 
the date of initiation of the project or activity''.
    (d) Monitoring.--Section 519 of such Act (114 Stat. 2654) is amended 
by adding at the end the following:
    ``(h) <<NOTE: Public information.>> Monitoring.--The Secretary shall 
develop an Illinois River basin monitoring program to support the plan 
developed under subsection (b). Data collected under the monitoring 
program shall incorporate data provided by the State of Illinois and 
shall be publicly accessible through electronic means, including on the 
Internet.''.
SEC. 5072. PROMONTORY POINT THIRD-PARTY REVIEW, CHICAGO SHORELINE, 
                          CHICAGO, ILLINOIS.

    (a) Review.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary shall conduct a third-party 
        review of the Promontory Point feature of the project for storm 
        damage reduction and shoreline erosion protection, Lake 
        Michigan, Illinois, from Wilmette, Illinois, to the Illinois-
        Indiana State line, authorized by section 101(a)(12) of the 
        Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3664), at a 
        cost not to exceed $450,000.
            (2) Joint review.--The Buffalo and Seattle Districts of the 
        Corps of Engineers shall jointly conduct the review under 
        paragraph (1).
            (3) Standards.--The review under paragraph (1) shall be 
        based on the standards under part 68 of title 36, Code of 
        Federal Regulations (or any successor regulation).

    (b) Contributions.--The Secretary may accept funds from a State or 
political subdivision of a State to conduct the review under paragraph 
(1).
    (c) Treatment.--The review under paragraph (1) shall not be 
considered to be an element of the project referred to in paragraph (1).
    (d) Effect of Section.--Nothing in this section shall be construed 
to affect the authorization for the project referred to in paragraph 
(1).
SEC. 5073. KASKASKIA RIVER BASIN, ILLINOIS, RESTORATION.

    (a) Kaskaskia River Basin Defined.--In this section, the term 
``Kaskaskia River Basin'' means the Kaskaskia River, Illinois, its 
backwaters, its side channels, and all tributaries, including their 
watersheds, draining into the Kaskaskia River.
    (b) Comprehensive Plan.--

[[Page 121 STAT. 1222]]

            (1) Development.--The Secretary shall develop, as 
        expeditiously as practicable, a comprehensive plan for the 
        purpose of restoring, preserving, and protecting the Kaskaskia 
        River Basin.
            (2) Technologies and innovative approaches.--The 
        comprehensive plan shall provide for the development of new 
        technologies and innovative approaches--
                    (A) to enhance the Kaskaskia River as a 
                transportation corridor;
                    (B) to improve water quality within the entire 
                Kaskaskia River Basin;
                    (C) to restore, enhance, and preserve habitat for 
                plants and wildlife;
                    (D) to ensure aquatic integrity of side channels and 
                backwaters and their connectivity with the mainstem 
                river;
                    (E) to increase economic opportunity for agriculture 
                and business communities; and
                    (F) to reduce the impacts of flooding to communities 
                and landowners.
            (3) Specific components.--The comprehensive plan shall 
        include such features as are necessary to provide for--
                    (A) the development and implementation of a program 
                for sediment removal technology, sediment 
                characterization, sediment transport, and beneficial 
                uses of sediment;
                    (B) the development and implementation of a program 
                for the planning, conservation, evaluation, and 
                construction of measures for fish and wildlife habitat 
                conservation and rehabilitation, and stabilization and 
                enhancement of land and water resources in the Kaskaskia 
                River Basin;
                    (C) the development and implementation of a long-
                term resource monitoring program for the Basin;
                    (D) a conveyance study of the Kaskaskia River 
                floodplain from Vandalia, Illinois, to Carlyle Lake to 
                determine the impacts of existing and future waterfowl 
                improvements on flood stages, including detailed surveys 
                and mapping information to ensure proper hydraulic and 
                hydrological analysis;
                    (E) the development and implementation of a 
                computerized inventory and analysis system for the 
                Basin;
                    (F) the development and implementation of a systemic 
                plan for the Basin to reduce flood impacts by means of 
                ecosystem restoration projects; and
                    (G) the study and design of necessary measures to 
                reduce ongoing headcutting and restore the aquatic 
                environment of the Basin that has been degraded by the 
                headcutting that has occurred above the existing grade 
                control structure.
            (4) Consultation.--The comprehensive plan shall be developed 
        by the Secretary in consultation with appropriate Federal 
        agencies, the State of Illinois, and the Kaskaskia River 
        Watershed Association.
            (5) Report to congress.--Not later than 2 years after the 
        date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the 
        Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of 
        Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public 
        Works of the Senate a report containing the comprehensive plan.

[[Page 121 STAT. 1223]]

            (6) Additional studies and analyses.--After submission of a 
        report under paragraph (5), the Secretary shall conduct studies 
        and analyses of projects related to the comprehensive plan that 
        are appropriate and consistent with this subsection.

    (c) General Provisions.--
            (1) Water quality.--In carrying out activities under this 
        section, the Secretary's recommendations shall be consistent 
        with applicable State water quality standards.
            (2) <<NOTE: Procedures.>> Public participation.--In 
        developing the comprehensive plan under subsection (b), the 
        Secretary shall implement procedures to facilitate public 
        participation, including providing advance notice of meetings, 
        providing adequate opportunity for public input and comment, 
        maintaining appropriate records, and making a record of the 
        proceedings of meetings available for public inspection.

    (d) Critical Projects and Initiatives.--If the Secretary, in 
cooperation with appropriate Federal agencies and the State of Illinois, 
determines that a project or initiative for the Kaskaskia River Basin 
will produce independent, immediate, and substantial benefits, the 
Secretary may proceed with the implementation of the project.
    (e) Coordination.--The Secretary shall integrate activities carried 
out under this section with ongoing Federal and State programs, 
projects, and activities, including the following:
            (1) Farm programs of the Department of Agriculture.
            (2) Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program (State of 
        Illinois) and Conservation 2000 Ecosystem Program of the 
        Illinois department of natural resources.
            (3) Conservation 2000 Conservation Practices Program and the 
        Livestock Management Facilities Act administered by the Illinois 
        department of agriculture.
            (4) National Buffer Initiative of the Natural Resources 
        Conservation Service.
            (5) Nonpoint source grant program administered by the 
        Illinois environmental protection agency.
            (6) Other programs that may be developed by the State of 
        Illinois or the Federal Government, or that are carried out by 
        nonprofit organizations, to carry out the objectives of the 
        Kaskaskia River Basin Comprehensive Plan.

    (f) In-Kind Services.--The Secretary may credit the cost of in-kind 
services provided by the non-Federal interest for an activity carried 
out under this section toward not more than 80 percent of the non-
Federal share of the cost of the activity. In-kind services shall 
include all State funds expended on programs that accomplish the goals 
of this section, as determined by the Secretary. The programs may 
include the Kaskaskia River Conservation Reserve Program, the Illinois 
Conservation 2000 Program, the Open Lands Trust Fund, and other 
appropriate programs carried out in the Kaskaskia River Basin.
    (g) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated $20,000,000 to carry out this section.
SEC. 5074. SOUTHWEST ILLINOIS.

    (a) Southwest Illinois Defined.--In this section, the term 
``Southwest Illinois'' means the counties of Madison, St. Clair, Monroe, 
Randolph, Perry, Franklin, Jackson, Union, Alexander, Pulaski, and 
Williamson, Illinois.

[[Page 121 STAT. 1224]]

    (b) Establishment of Program.--The Secretary may establish a program 
to provide environmental assistance to non-Federal interests in 
Southwest Illinois.
    (c) Form of Assistance.--Assistance provided under this section may 
be in the form of design and construction assistance for water-related 
environmental infrastructure and resource protection and development 
projects in Southwest Illinois, including projects for wastewater 
treatment and related facilities, water supply and related facilities, 
and surface water resource protection and development.
    (d) Ownership Requirement.--The Secretary may provide assistance for 
a project under this section only if the project is publicly owned.
    (e) Partnership Agreements.--
            (1) In general.--Before providing assistance under this 
        section, the Secretary shall enter into a partnership agreement 
        with a non-Federal interest to provide for design and 
        construction of the project to be carried out with the 
        assistance.
            (2) Requirements.--Each partnership agreement for a project 
        entered into under this subsection shall provide for the 
        following:
                    (A) Plan.--Development by the Secretary, in 
                consultation with appropriate Federal and State 
                officials, of a facilities or resource protection and 
                development plan, including appropriate engineering 
                plans and specifications.
                    (B) Legal and institutional structures.--
                Establishment of such legal and institutional structures 
                as are necessary to ensure the effective long-term 
                operation of the project by the non-Federal interest.
            (3) Cost sharing.--
                    (A) In general.--The Federal share of the cost of a 
                project under this section--
                          (i) shall be 75 percent; and
                          (ii) may be provided in the form of grants or 
                      reimbursements of project costs.
                    (B) Credit for work.--The Secretary shall credit, in 
                accordance with section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 
                1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), toward the non-Federal share 
                of the cost of the project the cost of design work 
                carried out by the non-Federal interest for the project 
                before the date of the partnership agreement for the 
                project.
                    (C) Credit for interest.--In case of a delay in the 
                funding of the non-Federal share of a project that is 
                the subject of an agreement under this section, the non-
                Federal interest shall receive credit for reasonable 
                interest incurred in providing the non-Federal share.
                    (D) Credit for land, easements, and rights-of-way.--
                The non-Federal interest shall receive credit for land, 
                easements, rights-of-way, and relocations toward the 
                non-Federal share of project costs (including all 
                reasonable costs associated with obtaining permits 
                necessary for the construction, operation, and 
                maintenance of the project on publicly owned or 
                controlled land), but the credit may not exceed 25 
                percent of total project costs.

[[Page 121 STAT. 1225]]

                    (E) Operation and maintenance.--The non-Federal 
                share of operation and maintenance costs for projects 
                constructed with assistance provided under this section 
                shall be 100 percent.

    (f) Applicability of Other Federal and State Laws.--Nothing in this 
section shall be construed to waive, limit, or otherwise affect the 
applicability of any provision of Federal or State law that would 
otherwise apply to a project to be carried out with assistance provided 
under this section.
    (g) Nonprofit Entities.--In accordance with section 221(b) of the 
Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b(b)), for any project 
carried out under this section, a non-Federal interest may include a 
nonprofit entity with the consent of the affected local government.
    (h) Corps of Engineers Expenses.--Not more than 10 percent of the 
amounts appropriated to carry out this section may be used by the Corps 
of Engineers district offices to administer projects under this section 
at Federal expense.
    (i) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $40,000,000.
SEC. 5075. CALUMET REGION, INDIANA.

    Section 219(f)(12) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1992 <<NOTE: 106 Stat. 4835.>> (113 Stat. 335; 117 Stat. 1843) is 
amended--
            (1) by striking ``$30,000,000'' and inserting the following:
                    ``(A) In general.--$100,000,000'';
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(B) Credit.--The Secretary shall credit, in 
                accordance with section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 
                1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), toward the non-Federal share 
                of the cost of the project the cost of planning and 
                design work carried out by the non-Federal interest for 
                the project before the date of the partnership agreement 
                for the project.''; and
            (3) by aligning the remainder of the text of subparagraph 
        (A) (as designated by paragraph (1) of this section) with 
        subparagraph (B) (as added by paragraph (2) of this section).
SEC. 5076. FLOODPLAIN MAPPING, MISSOURI RIVER, IOWA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall provide assistance for a 
project to develop maps identifying 100- and 500-year flood inundation 
areas in the State of Iowa, along the Missouri River.
    (b) Requirements.--Maps developed under the project shall include 
hydrologic and hydraulic information and shall accurately portray the 
flood hazard areas in the floodplain. The maps shall be produced in a 
high resolution format and shall be made available to the State of Iowa 
in an electronic format.
    (c) Participation of FEMA.--The Secretary and the non-Federal 
interests for the project shall work with the Administrator of the 
Federal Emergency Management Agency to ensure the validity of the maps 
developed under the project for flood insurance purposes.
    (d) Forms of Assistance.--In carrying out the project, the Secretary 
may enter into contracts or cooperative agreements with the non-Federal 
interests or provide reimbursements of project costs.
    (e) Federal Share.--The Federal share of the cost of the project 
shall be 50 percent.

[[Page 121 STAT. 1226]]

    (f) Limitation on Statutory Construction.--Nothing in this section 
shall be construed to modify the prioritization of map updates or the 
substantive requirements of the Federal Emergency Management Agency 
flood map modernization program authorized by section 1360 of the 
National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 4101).
    (g) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $3,000,000.
SEC. 5077. <<NOTE: Reports.>> PADUCAH, KENTUCKY.

    The Secretary shall complete a feasibility report for rehabilitation 
of the project for flood damage reduction, Paducah, Kentucky, authorized 
by section 4 of the Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938 (52 Stat. 1217), 
and, if the Secretary determines that the project is feasible, the 
Secretary may carry out the project at a total cost of $3,000,000.
SEC. 5078. SOUTHERN AND EASTERN KENTUCKY.

    Section 531 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 
Stat. 3773; 113 Stat. 348; 117 Stat. 142) is amended by adding at the 
end the following:
    ``(i) Corps of Engineers Expenses.--Not more than 10 percent of the 
amounts appropriated to carry out this section may be used by the Corps 
of Engineers district offices to administer projects under this section 
at Federal expense.''.
SEC. 5079. WINCHESTER, KENTUCKY.

    Section 219(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 
Stat. 4835; 114 Stat. 2763A-219) is amended by adding at the end the 
following:
            ``(41) Winchester, kentucky.--Wastewater infrastructure, 
        Winchester, Kentucky.''.
SEC. 5080. BATON ROUGE, LOUISIANA.

    Section 219(f)(21) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1992 <<NOTE: 106 Stat. 4835.>> (113 Stat. 336; 114 Stat. 2763A-220) is 
amended by striking ``$20,000,000'' and inserting ``$35,000,000''.
SEC. 5081. CALCASIEU SHIP CHANNEL, LOUISIANA.

    The Secretary shall expedite completion of a dredged material 
management plan for the Calcasieu Ship Channel, Louisiana, and may take 
interim measures to increase the capacity of existing disposal areas, or 
to construct new confined or beneficial use disposal areas, for the 
channel.
SEC. 5082. EAST ATCHAFALAYA BASIN AND AMITE RIVER BASIN REGION, 
                          LOUISIANA.

    (a) East Atchafalaya Basin and Amite River Basin Region Defined.--In 
this section, the term ``East Atchafalaya Basin and Amite River Basin 
Region'' means the following parishes and municipalities in the State of 
Louisiana: Ascension, East Baton Rouge, East Feliciana, Iberville, 
Livingston, Pointe Coupee, St. Helena, West Baton Rouge, and West 
Feliciana.
    (b) Establishment of Program.--The Secretary may establish a program 
to provide environmental assistance to non-Federal interests in the East 
Atchafalaya Basin and Amite River Basin Region.
    (c) Form of Assistance.--Assistance provided under this section may 
be in the form of design and construction assistance

[[Page 121 STAT. 1227]]

for water-related environmental infrastructure and resource protection 
and development projects in the East Atchafalaya Basin and Amite River 
Basin Region, including projects for wastewater treatment and related 
facilities, water supply and related facilities, environmental 
restoration, and surface water resource protection and development.
    (d) Ownership Requirement.--The Secretary may provide assistance for 
a project under this section only if the project is publicly owned.
    (e) Partnership Agreements.--
            (1) In general.--Before providing assistance under this 
        section, the Secretary shall enter into a partnership agreement 
        with a non-Federal interest to provide for design and 
        construction of the project to be carried out with the 
        assistance.
            (2) Requirements.--Each partnership agreement of a project 
        entered into under this subsection shall provide for the 
        following:
                    (A) Plan.--Development by the Secretary, in 
                consultation with appropriate Federal and State 
                officials, of a facilities or resource protection and 
                development plan, including appropriate engineering 
                plans and specifications.
                    (B) Legal and institutional structures.--
                Establishment of such legal and institutional structures 
                as are necessary to ensure the effective long-term 
                operation of the project by the non-Federal interest.
            (3) Cost sharing.--
                    (A) In general.--The Federal share of the cost of a 
                project under this section--
                          (i) shall be 75 percent; and
                          (ii) may be provided in the form of grants or 
                      reimbursements of project costs.
                    (B) Credit for work.--The Secretary shall credit, in 
                accordance with section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 
                1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), toward the non-Federal share 
                of the cost of the project the cost of design work 
                carried out by the non-Federal interest for the project 
                before the date of the partnership agreement for the 
                project.
                    (C) Credit for interest.--In case of a delay in the 
                funding of the non-Federal share of a project that is 
                the subject of an agreement under this section, the non-
                Federal interest shall receive credit for reasonable 
                interest incurred in providing the non-Federal share.
                    (D) Credit for land, easements, and rights-of-way.--
                The non-Federal interest shall receive credit for land, 
                easements, rights-of-way, and relocations toward the 
                non-Federal share of project costs (including all 
                reasonable costs associated with obtaining permits 
                necessary for the construction, operation, and 
                maintenance of the project on publicly owned or 
                controlled land), but the credit may not exceed 25 
                percent of total project costs.
                    (E) Operation and maintenance.--The non-Federal 
                share of operation and maintenance costs for projects 
                constructed with assistance provided under this section 
                shall be 100 percent.

    (f) Applicability of Other Federal and State Laws.--Nothing in this 
section shall be construed to waive, limit, or otherwise affect the 
applicability of any provision of Federal or State

[[Page 121 STAT. 1228]]

law that would otherwise apply to a project to be carried out with 
assistance provided under this section.
    (g) Nonprofit Entities.--In accordance with section 221(b) of the 
Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b(b)), for any project 
carried out under this section, a non-Federal interest may include a 
nonprofit entity with the consent of the affected local government.
    (h) Corps of Engineers Expenses.--Not more than 10 percent of the 
amounts appropriated to carry out this section may be used by the Corps 
of Engineers district offices to administer projects under this section 
at Federal expense.
    (i) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $40,000,000.
SEC. 5083. INNER HARBOR NAVIGATION CANAL LOCK PROJECT, LOUISIANA.

    Not <<NOTE: Deadline.>> later than July 1, 2008, the Secretary 
shall--
            (1) issue a final environmental impact statement relating to 
        the Inner Harbor Navigation Canal Lock project, Louisiana; and
            (2) develop and maintain a transportation mitigation program 
        relating to that project in coordination with--
                    (A) St. Bernard Parish;
                    (B) Orleans Parish;
                    (C) the Old Arabi Neighborhood Association; and
                    (D) other interested parties.
SEC. 5084. <<NOTE: 33 USC 1273 note.>> LAKE PONTCHARTRAIN, 
                          LOUISIANA.

    For purposes of carrying out section 121 of the Federal Water 
Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1273), the Lake Pontchartrain, 
Louisiana, basin stakeholders conference convened by the Environmental 
Protection Agency, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, and 
United States Geological Survey on February 25, 2002, shall be treated 
as being a management conference convened under section 320 of such Act 
(33 U.S.C. 1330).
SEC. 5085. SOUTHEAST LOUISIANA REGION, LOUISIANA.

    (a) Definition of Southeast Louisiana Region.--In this section, the 
term ``Southeast Louisiana Region'' means any of the following parishes 
and municipalities in the State of Louisiana:
            (1) Orleans.
            (2) Jefferson.
            (3) St. Tammany.
            (4) Tangipahoa.
            (5) St. Bernard.
            (6) St. Charles.
            (7) St. John.
            (8) Plaquemines.

    (b) Establishment of Program.--The Secretary may establish a program 
to provide environmental assistance to non-Federal interests in the 
Southeast Louisiana Region.
    (c) Form of Assistance.--Assistance provided under this section may 
be in the form of design and construction assistance for water-related 
environmental infrastructure and resource protection and development 
projects in the Southeast Louisiana Region, including projects for 
wastewater treatment and related facilities, water supply and related 
facilities, environmental restoration, and

[[Page 121 STAT. 1229]]

surface water resource protection and development (including projects to 
improve water quality in the Lake Pontchartrain basin).
    (d) Ownership Requirement.--The Secretary may provide assistance for 
a project under this section only if the project is publicly owned.
    (e) Partnership Agreements.--
            (1) In general.--Before providing assistance under this 
        section, the Secretary shall enter into a partnership agreement 
        with a non-Federal interest to provide for design and 
        construction of the project to be carried out with the 
        assistance.
            (2) Requirements.--Each partnership agreement for a project 
        entered into under this subsection shall provide for the 
        following:
                    (A) Plan.--Development by the Secretary, in 
                consultation with appropriate Federal and State 
                officials, of a facilities or resource protection and 
                development plan, including appropriate engineering 
                plans and specifications.
                    (B) Legal and institutional structures.--
                Establishment of such legal and institutional structures 
                as are necessary to ensure the effective long-term 
                operation of the project by the non-Federal interest.
            (3) Cost sharing.--
                    (A) In general.--The Federal share of the cost of a 
                project under this section--
                          (i) shall be 75 percent; and
                          (ii) may be provided in the form of grants or 
                      reimbursements of project costs.
                    (B) Credit for work.--The Secretary shall credit, in 
                accordance with section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 
                1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), toward the non-Federal share 
                of the cost of the project the cost of design work 
                carried out by the non-Federal interest for the project 
                before the date of the partnership agreement for the 
                project.
                    (C) Credit for interest.--In case of a delay in the 
                funding of the non-Federal share of the costs of a 
                project that is the subject of an agreement under this 
                section, the non-Federal interest shall receive credit 
                for reasonable interest incurred in providing the non-
                Federal share.
                    (D) Credit for land, easements, and rights-of-way.--
                The non-Federal interest shall receive credit for land, 
                easements, rights-of-way, and relocations toward the 
                non-Federal share of project costs (including all 
                reasonable costs associated with obtaining permits 
                necessary for the construction, operation, and 
                maintenance of the project on publicly owned or 
                controlled land), but the credit may not exceed 25 
                percent of total project costs.
                    (E) Operation and maintenance.--The non-Federal 
                share of operation and maintenance costs for projects 
                constructed with assistance provided under this section 
                shall be 100 percent.

    (f) Applicability of Other Federal and State Laws.--Nothing in this 
section shall be construed to waive, limit, or otherwise affect the 
applicability of any provision of Federal or State law that would 
otherwise apply to a project to be carried out with assistance provided 
under this section.
    (g) Nonprofit Entities.--In accordance with section 221(b) of the 
Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b(b)), for any

[[Page 121 STAT. 1230]]

project carried out under this section, a non-Federal interest may 
include a nonprofit entity with the consent of the affected local 
government.
    (h) Corps of Engineers Expenses.--Not more than 10 percent of 
amounts made available to carry out this section may be used by the 
Corps of Engineers district offices to administer projects under this 
section at Federal expense.
    (i) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $17,000,000.
SEC. 5086. WEST BATON ROUGE PARISH, LOUISIANA.

    (a) Modification of Study.--The study for the project for waterfront 
and riverine preservation, restoration, and enhancement, Mississippi 
River, West Baton Rouge Parish, Louisiana, being carried out under 
Committee Resolution 2570 of the Committee on Transportation and 
Infrastructure of the House of Representatives adopted July 23, 1998, is 
modified to add West Feliciana Parish and East Baton Rouge Parish to the 
geographic scope of the study.
    (b) Construction.--The Secretary may, upon completion of the study, 
participate in the ecosystem restoration, navigation, flood damage 
reduction, and recreation components of the project.
    (c) Credit.--The Secretary shall credit, in accordance with section 
221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), toward the 
non-Federal share of the cost of the project the cost of design work 
carried out by the non-Federal interest for the project before the date 
of the partnership agreement for the project.
    (d) Expedited Consideration.--Section 517(5) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 345) is amended to read as follows:
            ``(5) Mississippi River, West Baton Rouge, West Feliciana, 
        and East Baton Rouge Parishes, Louisiana, project for waterfront 
        and riverine preservation, restoration, and enhancement 
        modifications.''.

    (e) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $10,000,000.
SEC. 5087. CHARLESTOWN, MARYLAND.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary may carry out a project for 
nonstructural flood damage reduction and ecosystem restoration at 
Charlestown, Maryland.
    (b) Land Acquisition.--The flood damage reduction component of the 
project may include the acquisition of private property from willing 
sellers.
    (c) Justification.--Any nonstructural flood damage reduction project 
to be carried out under this section that will result in the conversion 
of property to use for ecosystem restoration and wildlife habitat shall 
be justified based on national ecosystem restoration benefits.
    (d) Use of Acquired Property.--Property acquired under this section 
shall be maintained in public ownership for ecosystem restoration and 
wildlife habitat.
    (e) Ability to Pay.--In determining the appropriate non-Federal cost 
share for the project, the Secretary shall determine the ability of 
Cecil County, Maryland, to participate as a cost-sharing non-Federal 
interest in accordance with section 103(m) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2213(m)).

[[Page 121 STAT. 1231]]

    (f) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated $2,000,000 to carry out this section.
SEC. 5088. ST. MARY'S RIVER, MARYLAND.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall carry out the project for 
shoreline protection, St. Mary's River, Maryland, under section 3 of the 
Act entitled ``An Act authorizing Federal participation in the cost of 
protecting the shores of publicly owned property'', approved August 13, 
1946 (33 U.S.C. 426g).
    (b) Use of Funds.--In carrying out the project under subsection (a), 
the Secretary shall use funds made available for such project under 
Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act, 2006 (Public Law 109-
103).
SEC. 5089. MASSACHUSETTS DREDGED MATERIAL DISPOSAL SITES.

    The Secretary may cooperate with Massachusetts in the management and 
long-term monitoring of aquatic dredged material disposal sites within 
the State and is authorized to accept funds from the State to carry out 
such activities.
SEC. 5090. <<NOTE: Study.>> ONTONAGON HARBOR, MICHIGAN.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study of shore damage in the vicinity 
of the project for navigation, Ontonagon Harbor, Ontonagon County, 
Michigan, authorized by section 101 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 
1962 (76 Stat. 1176) and reauthorized by section 363 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3730), to determine if the 
damage is the result of a Federal navigation project, and, if the 
Secretary determines that the damage is the result of a Federal 
navigation project, the Secretary shall carry out a project to mitigate 
the damage under section 111 of the River and Harbor Act of 1968 (33 
U.S.C. 426i).
SEC. 5091. CROOKSTON, MINNESOTA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study for a project for emergency 
streambank protection along the Red Lake River in Crookston, Minnesota, 
and, if the Secretary determines that the project is feasible, the 
Secretary may carry out the project under section 14 of the Flood 
Control Act of 1946 (33 U.S.C. 701r); except that the maximum amount of 
Federal funds that may be expended for the project shall be $6,500,000.
SEC. 5092. GARRISON AND KATHIO TOWNSHIP, MINNESOTA.

    (a) Project Description.--Section 219(f)(61) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1992 <<NOTE: 106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 335.>> (114 
Stat. 2763A-221) is amended--
            (1) in the paragraph heading by striking ``and kathio 
        township'' and inserting ``, crow wing county, mille lacs 
        county, mille lacs indian reservation, and kathio township'';
            (2) by striking ``$11,000,000'' and inserting 
        ``$17,000,000'';
            (3) by inserting ``, Crow Wing County, Mille Lacs County, 
        Mille Lacs Indian Reservation established by the treaty of 
        February 22, 1855 (10 Stat. 1165),'' after ``Garrison''; and
            (4) by adding at the end the following: ``Such assistance 
        shall be provided directly to the Garrison-Kathio-West Mille 
        Lacs Lake Sanitary District, Minnesota, except for assistance 
        provided directly to the Mille Lacs Band of Ojibwe at the 
        discretion of the Secretary.''.

[[Page 121 STAT. 1232]]

    (b) Procedures.--In carrying out the project authorized by such 
section 219(f)(61), the Secretary may use the cost sharing and 
contracting procedures available to the Secretary under section 569 of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 368).
SEC. 5093. ITASCA COUNTY, MINNESOTA.

    The Secretary shall carry out a project for flood damage reduction, 
Trout Lake and Canisteo Pit, Itasca County, Minnesota, without regard to 
normal policy considerations.
SEC. 5094. MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA.

    (a) Conveyance.--The Secretary shall convey to the city of 
Minneapolis by quitclaim deed and without consideration all right, 
title, and interest of the United States to the property known as the 
War Department (Fort Snelling Interceptor) Tunnel in Minneapolis, 
Minnesota.
    (b) Applicability of Property Screening Provisions.--Section 2696 of 
title 10, United States Code, shall not apply to the conveyance under 
this section.
SEC. 5095. NORTHEASTERN MINNESOTA.

    (a) In General.--Section 569 of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1999 (113 Stat. 368) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a) by striking ``Benton, Sherburne,'' and 
        inserting ``Beltrami, Hubbard, Wadena,'';
            (2) by striking the last sentence of subsection (e)(3)(B);
            (3) by striking subsection (g) and inserting the following:

    ``(g) Nonprofit Entities.--In accordance with section 221(b) of the 
Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b(b)), for any project 
carried out under this section, a non-Federal interest may include a 
nonprofit entity with the consent of the affected local government.'';
            (4) in subsection (h) by striking ``$40,000,000'' and 
        inserting ``$54,000,000''; and
            (5) by adding at the end the following:

    ``(i) Corps of Engineers Expenses.--Not more than 10 percent of the 
amounts appropriated to carry out this section may be used by the Corps 
of Engineers district offices to administer projects under this section 
at Federal expense.''.
    (b) Biwabik, Minnesota.--The Secretary shall reimburse the non-
Federal interest for the project for environmental infrastructure, 
Biwabik, Minnesota, carried out under section 569 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 368), for planning, design, and 
construction costs that were incurred by the non-Federal interest with 
respect to the project before the date of the partnership agreement for 
the project and that were in excess of the non-Federal share of the cost 
of the project if the Secretary determines that the costs are 
appropriate.
SEC. 5096. WILD RICE RIVER, MINNESOTA.

    The Secretary shall expedite the completion of the general 
reevaluation report, authorized by section 438 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2640), for the project for flood 
protection, Wild Rice River, Minnesota, authorized by section 201 of the 
Flood Control Act of 1970 (84 Stat. 1825), to develop alternatives to 
the Twin Valley Lake feature, and upon

[[Page 121 STAT. 1233]]

the completion of such report, shall construct the project at a total 
cost of $20,000,000.
SEC. 5097. MISSISSIPPI.

    Section 592(g) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 
Stat. 380; 117 Stat. 1837) is amended by striking ``$100,000,000'' and 
inserting ``$110,000,000''.
SEC. 5098. HARRISON, HANCOCK, AND JACKSON COUNTIES, MISSISSIPPI.

    In carrying out projects for the protection, restoration, and 
creation of aquatic and ecologically related habitats located in 
Harrison, Hancock, and Jackson Counties, Mississippi, under section 204 
of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (33 U.S.C. 2326), the 
Secretary shall accept any portion of the non-Federal share of the cost 
of the projects in the form of in-kind services and materials.
SEC. 5099. MISSISSIPPI RIVER, MISSOURI AND ILLINOIS.

    As a part of the operation and maintenance of the project for the 
Mississippi River (Regulating Works), between the Ohio and Missouri 
Rivers, Missouri and Illinois, authorized by the first section of an Act 
entitled ``Making appropriations for the construction, repair, and 
preservation of certain public works on rivers and harbors, and for 
other purposes'', approved June 25, 1910 (36 Stat. 630), the Secretary 
may carry out activities necessary to restore and protect fish and 
wildlife habitat in the middle Mississippi River system. Such activities 
may include modification of navigation training structures, modification 
and creation of side channels, modification and creation of islands, and 
studies and analysis necessary to apply adaptive management principles 
in design of future work.
SEC. 5100. ST. LOUIS, MISSOURI.

    Section 219(f)(32) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1992 <<NOTE: 106 Stat. 4835.>> (113 Stat. 337) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``a project'' and inserting ``projects'';
            (2) by striking ``$15,000,000'' and inserting 
        ``$35,000,000''; and
            (3) by inserting ``and St. Louis County'' before ``, 
        Missouri''.
SEC. 5101. ST. LOUIS REGIONAL GREENWAYS, ST. LOUIS, MISSOURI.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary may participate in the ecosystem 
restoration, recreation, and flood damage reduction components of the 
St. Louis Regional Greenways Proposal of the Metropolitan Park and 
Recreation District, St. Louis, Missouri, dated March 31, 2004.
    (b) Coordination.--In carrying out this section, the Secretary shall 
coordinate with appropriate representatives in the vicinity of St. 
Louis, Missouri, including the Metropolitan Park and Recreation 
District, the city of St. Louis, St. Louis County, and St. Charles 
County.
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated $10,000,000 to carry out this section.

[[Page 121 STAT. 1234]]

SEC. 5102. MISSOULA, MONTANA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary may participate in the ecosystem 
restoration, flood damage reduction, and recreation components of the 
Clark Fork River Revitalization Project, Missoula, Montana.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated $5,000,000 to carry out this section.
SEC. 5103. ST. MARY PROJECT, GLACIER COUNTY, MONTANA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary, in consultation with the Bureau of 
Reclamation, shall conduct all necessary studies, develop an emergency 
response plan, provide technical and planning and design assistance, and 
rehabilitate and construct the St. Mary Diversion and Conveyance Works 
project located within the exterior boundaries of the Blackfeet 
Reservation in the State of Montana, at a total cost of $153,000,000.
    (b) Federal Share.--The Federal share of the total cost of the 
project under this section shall be 75 percent.
    (c) Participation by Blackfeet Tribe and Fort Belknap Indian 
Community.--
            (1) In general.--Except as provided in paragraph (2), no 
        construction shall be carried out under this section until the 
        earlier of--
                    (A) the date on which Congress approves the reserved 
                water rights settlements of the Blackfeet Tribe and the 
                Fort Belknap Indian Community; and
                    (B) January 1, 2011.
            (2) Exception.--Paragraph (1) shall not apply with respect 
        to construction relating to--
                    (A) standard operation and maintenance; or
                    (B) emergency repairs to ensure water transportation 
                or the protection of life and property.
            (3) Requirement.--The Blackfeet Tribe shall be a participant 
        in all phases of the project authorized by this section.
SEC. 5104. LOWER PLATTE RIVER WATERSHED RESTORATION, NEBRASKA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary may cooperate with and provide 
assistance to the Lower Platte River natural resources districts in the 
State of Nebraska to serve as non-Federal interests with respect to--
            (1) conducting comprehensive watershed planning in the 
        natural resource districts;
            (2) assessing water resources in the natural resource 
        districts; and
            (3) providing project feasibility planning, design, and 
        construction assistance for water resource and watershed 
        management in the natural resource districts, including projects 
        for environmental restoration and flood damage reduction.

    (b) Funding.--
            (1) Federal share.--The Federal share of the cost of 
        carrying out an activity described in subsection (a)(1) shall be 
        75 percent.
            (2) Non-federal share.--The non-Federal share of the cost of 
        carrying out an activity described in subsection (a) may be 
        provided in cash or in kind.

[[Page 121 STAT. 1235]]

    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to the Secretary to carry out this section $12,000,000.
SEC. 5105. HACKENSACK MEADOWLANDS AREA, NEW JERSEY.

    Section 324 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 
Stat. 4849; 110 Stat. 3779) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)--
                    (A) by striking ``design'' and inserting ``planning, 
                design,''; and
                    (B) by striking ``Hackensack Meadowlands 
                Development'' and all that follows through ``Plan for'' 
                and inserting ``New Jersey Meadowlands Commission for 
                the development of an environmental improvement program 
                for'';
            (2) in subsection (b)--
                    (A) in the subsection heading by striking 
                ``Required'';
                    (B) by striking ``shall'' and inserting ``may'';
                    (C) by striking paragraph (1) and inserting the 
                following:
            ``(1) Restoration and acquisitions of significant wetlands 
        and aquatic habitat that contribute to the Meadowlands 
        ecosystem.'';
                    (D) in paragraph (2) by inserting ``and aquatic 
                habitat'' before the period at the end; and
                    (E) by striking paragraph (7) and inserting the 
                following:
            ``(7) Research, development, and implementation for a water 
        quality improvement program, including restoration of hydrology 
        and tidal flows and remediation of hot spots and other sources 
        of contaminants that degrade existing or planned sites.'';
            (3) in subsection (c)--
                    (A) by striking ``non-Federal sponsor'' and 
                inserting ``non-Federal interest''; and
                    (B) by inserting before the last sentence the 
                following: ``The non-Federal interest may also provide 
                in-kind services not to exceed the non-Federal share of 
                the total project cost.'';
            (4) by redesignating subsection (d) as subsection (e);
            (5) by inserting after subsection (c) the following:

    ``(d) Credit.--The Secretary shall credit, in accordance with 
section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), 
toward the non-Federal share of the cost of a project to be carried out 
under the program developed under subsection (a) the cost of design work 
carried out by the non-Federal interest for the project before the date 
of the partnership agreement for the project.''; and
            (6) in subsection (e) (as redesignated by paragraph (4) of 
        this subsection) by striking ``$5,000,000'' and inserting 
        ``$20,000,000''.
SEC. 5106. ATLANTIC COAST OF NEW YORK.

    (a) Development of Program.--Section 404(a) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4863) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``processes'' and inserting ``and related 
        environmental processes'';
            (2) by inserting after ``Atlantic Coast'' the following: 
        ``(and associated back bays)'';

[[Page 121 STAT. 1236]]

            (3) by inserting after ``actions'' the following: ``, 
        environmental restoration or conservation measures for coastal 
        and back bays,''; and
            (4) by adding at the end the following: ``The plan for 
        collecting data and monitoring information included in such 
        annual report shall be coordinated with and agreed to by 
        appropriate agencies of the State of New York.''.

    (b) Annual Reports.--Section 404(b) of such Act is amended--
            (1) by striking ``Initial Plan.--Not later than 12 months 
        after the date of the enactment of this Act, the'' and inserting 
        ``Annual Reports.--The'';
            (2) by striking ``initial plan for data collection and 
        monitoring'' and inserting ``annual report of data collection 
        and monitoring activities''; and
            (3) by striking the last sentence.

    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--Section 404(c) of such 
Act <<NOTE: 106 Stat. 4863.>> (113 Stat. 341) is amended by striking 
``and an additional total of $2,500,000 for fiscal years thereafter'' 
and inserting ``$2,500,000 for fiscal years 2000 through 2004, and 
$7,500,000 for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2004,''.

    (d) Tsunami Warning System.--Section 404 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4863) is amended by adding at the end 
the following:
    ``(d) Tsunami Warning System.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated $800,000 for the Secretary to carry out a project for a 
tsunami warning system, Atlantic Coast of New York.''.
SEC. 5107. COLLEGE POINT, NEW YORK CITY, NEW YORK.

    In carrying out section 312 of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1990 (104 Stat. 4639), the Secretary shall give priority to work in 
College Point, New York City, New York.
SEC. 5108. FLUSHING BAY AND CREEK, NEW YORK CITY, NEW YORK.

    The Secretary shall credit, in accordance with section 221 of the 
Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), toward the non-Federal 
share of the cost of the project for ecosystem restoration, Flushing Bay 
and Creek, New York City, New York, the cost of design and construction 
work carried out by the non-Federal interest before the date of the 
partnership agreement for the project.
SEC. 5109. HUDSON RIVER, NEW YORK.

    The Secretary may participate with the State of New York, New York 
City, and the Hudson River Park Trust in carrying out activities to 
restore critical marine habitat, improve safety, and protect and 
rehabilitate critical infrastructure with respect to the Hudson River. 
There <<NOTE: Appropriation authorization.>> is authorized to be 
appropriated $10,000,000 to carry out this section.
SEC. 5110. MOUNT MORRIS DAM, NEW YORK.

    As part of the operation and maintenance of the Mount Morris Dam, 
New York, the Secretary may make improvements to the access road for the 
dam to provide safe access to a Federal visitor's center.

[[Page 121 STAT. 1237]]

SEC. 5111. NORTH HEMPSTEAD AND GLEN COVE NORTH SHORE WATERSHED 
                          RESTORATION, NEW YORK.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary may participate in the ecosystem 
restoration, navigation, flood damage reduction, and recreation 
components of the North Hempstead and Glen Cove North Shore watershed 
restoration, New York.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated $10,000,000 to carry out this section.
SEC. 5112. ROCHESTER, NEW YORK.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary may participate in the ecosystem 
restoration, navigation, flood damage reduction, and recreation 
components of the Port of Rochester waterfront revitalization project, 
Rochester, New York.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated $10,000,000 to carry out this section.
SEC. 5113. NORTH CAROLINA.

    (a) Establishment of Program.--The Secretary shall establish a 
program to provide environmental assistance to non-Federal interests in 
the State of North Carolina.
    (b) Form of Assistance.--Assistance provided under this section may 
be in the form of design and construction assistance for environmental 
infrastructure and resource protection and development projects in North 
Carolina, including projects for--
            (1) wastewater treatment and related facilities;
            (2) combined sewer overflow, water supply, storage, 
        treatment, and related facilities;
            (3) drinking water infrastructure including treatment and 
        related facilities;
            (4) environmental restoration;
            (5) stormwater infrastructure; and
            (6) surface water resource protection and development.

    (c) Ownership Requirement.--The Secretary may provide assistance for 
a project under this section only if the project is publicly owned.
    (d) Partnership Agreements.--
            (1) In general.--Before providing assistance under this 
        section, the Secretary shall enter into a partnership agreement 
        with a non-Federal interest to provide for design and 
        construction of the project to be carried out with the 
        assistance.
            (2) Requirements.--Each partnership agreement for a project 
        entered into under this subsection shall provide for the 
        following:
                    (A) Plan.--Development by the Secretary, in 
                consultation with appropriate Federal and State 
                officials, of a facilities development plan or resource 
                protection plan, including appropriate plans and 
                specifications.
                    (B) Legal and institutional structures.--
                Establishment of such legal and institutional structures 
                as are necessary to ensure the effective long-term 
                operation of the project by the non-Federal interest.
            (3) Cost sharing.--
                    (A) In general.--The Federal share of the cost of a 
                project under this section--
                          (i) shall be 75 percent; and

[[Page 121 STAT. 1238]]

                          (ii) may be provided in the form of grants or 
                      reimbursements of project costs.
                    (B) Credit for work.--The Secretary shall credit, in 
                accordance with section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 
                1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), toward the non-Federal share 
                of the cost of the project, in an amount not to exceed 6 
                percent of the total construction costs of the project, 
                the cost of design work carried out by the non-Federal 
                interest for the project before the date of the 
                partnership agreement for the project.
                    (C) Credit for interest.--In case of a delay in the 
                funding of the non-Federal share of the costs of a 
                project that is the subject of an agreement under this 
                section, the non-Federal interest shall receive credit 
                for reasonable interest incurred in providing the non-
                Federal share.
                    (D) Credit for land, easements, and rights-of-way.--
                The non-Federal interest shall receive credit for land, 
                easements, rights-of-way, and relocations toward the 
                non-Federal share of project costs (including all 
                reasonable costs associated with obtaining permits 
                necessary for the construction, operation, and 
                maintenance of the project on publicly owned or 
                controlled land).
                    (E) Operation and maintenance.--The non-Federal 
                share of operation and maintenance costs for projects 
                constructed with assistance provided under this section 
                shall be 100 percent.

    (e) Applicability of Other Federal and State Laws.--Nothing in this 
section shall be construed to waive, limit, or otherwise affect the 
applicability of any provision of Federal or State law that would 
otherwise apply to a project to be carried out with assistance provided 
under this section.
    (f) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $13,000,000.
SEC. 5114. STANLY COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA.

    Section 219(f)(64) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1992 <<NOTE: 106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 335.>> (114 Stat. 2763A-221) is 
amended by inserting ``water and'' before ``wastewater''.
SEC. 5115. <<NOTE: Contracts.>> JOHN H. KERR DAM AND RESERVOIR, 
                          NORTH CAROLINA.

    The Secretary shall expedite the completion of the calculations 
necessary to negotiate and execute a revised, permanent contract for 
water supply storage at John H. Kerr Dam and Reservoir, North Carolina, 
among the Secretary and the Kerr Lake Regional Water System and the city 
of Henderson, North Carolina.
SEC. 5116. CINCINNATI, OHIO.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary may undertake the ecosystem 
restoration and recreation components of the Central Riverfront Park 
Master Plan, dated December 1999, at a total cost of $30,000,000.
    (b) Credit.--The Secretary shall credit, in accordance with section 
221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), toward the 
non-Federal share of the cost of the project the cost of planning, 
design, and construction work carried out by the non-Federal interest 
for the project before the date of the partnership agreement for the 
project.

[[Page 121 STAT. 1239]]

SEC. 5117. OHIO RIVER BASIN ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT.

    (a) Definitions.--In this section, the following definitions apply:
            (1) Ohio river basin.--The term ``Ohio River Basin'' means 
        the Ohio River, its backwaters, its side channels, and all 
        tributaries (including their watersheds) that drain into the 
        Ohio River and encompassing areas of any of the States of 
        Indiana, Ohio, Kentucky, Pennsylvania, West Virginia, Illinois, 
        New York, and Virginia.
            (2) Compact.--The term ``Compact'' means the Ohio River 
        Watershed Sanitation Commission flood and pollution control 
        compact between the States of Indiana, West Virginia, Ohio, 
        Kentucky, Pennsylvania, New York, Illinois, and Virginia, to 
        which consent was given by Congress pursuant to the Act of July 
        11, 1940 (54 Stat. 752) and that was chartered in 1948.

    (b) Assistance.--The Secretary may provide planning, design, and 
construction assistance to the Compact for the improvement of the 
quality of the environment in and along the Ohio River Basin.
    (c) Priorities.--In providing assistance under this section, the 
Secretary shall give priority to reducing or eliminating the presence of 
organic pollutants in the Ohio River Basin through the renovation and 
technological improvement of the organic detection system monitoring 
stations along the Ohio River in the States of Indiana, Ohio, West 
Virginia, Kentucky, and Pennsylvania.
    (d) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $2,500,000.
SEC. 5118. TOUSSAINT RIVER NAVIGATION PROJECT, CARROLL TOWNSHIP, 
                          OHIO.

    (a) In General.--The costs of operation and maintenance activities 
for the Toussaint River Federal navigation project, Carroll Township, 
Ohio, that are carried out in accordance with section 107 of the River 
and Harbor Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 577) and relate directly to the 
presence of unexploded ordnance, shall be carried out at Federal 
expense.
    (b) Calculation of Total Costs.--The Secretary shall not consider 
the additional costs of dredging due to the presence of unexploded 
ordnance when calculating the costs of the project referred to in 
subsection (a) for the purposes of section 107(b) of such Act (33 U.S.C. 
577(b)).
SEC. 5119. STATEWIDE COMPREHENSIVE WATER PLANNING, OKLAHOMA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall provide technical assistance 
for the development of updates of the Oklahoma comprehensive water plan.
    (b) Technical Assistance.--Technical assistance provided under 
subsection (a) may include--
            (1) acquisition of hydrologic data, groundwater 
        characterization, database development, and data distribution;
            (2) expansion of surface water and groundwater monitoring 
        networks;
            (3) assessment of existing water resources, surface water 
        storage, and groundwater storage potential;

[[Page 121 STAT. 1240]]

            (4) numerical analysis and modeling necessary to provide an 
        integrated understanding of water resources and water management 
        options;
            (5) participation in State planning forums and planning 
        groups;
            (6) coordination of Federal water management planning 
        efforts; and
            (7) technical review of data, models, planning scenarios, 
        and water plans developed by the State.

    (c) Allocation.--The Secretary shall allocate, subject to the 
availability of appropriations, $6,500,000 to provide technical 
assistance and for the development of updates of the Oklahoma 
comprehensive water plan.
    (d) Cost Sharing Requirement.--The non-Federal share of the total 
cost of any activity carried out under this section--
            (1) shall be 25 percent; and
            (2) may be in the form of cash or any in-kind services that 
        the Secretary determines would contribute substantially toward 
        the conduct and completion of the activity assisted.
SEC. 5120. FERN RIDGE DAM, OREGON.

    The Secretary may treat all work carried out for emergency 
corrective actions to repair the embankment dam at the Fern Ridge Lake 
project, Oregon, as a dam safety project. The cost of work carried out 
may be recovered in accordance with section 1203 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 467n; 100 Stat. 4263).
SEC. 5121. ALLEGHENY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA.

    Section 219(f)(66) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1992 <<NOTE: 106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 335.>> (114 Stat. 2763A-221) is 
amended--
            (1) by striking ``$20,000,000'' and inserting the following:
                    ``(A) In general.--$20,000,000'';
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(B) Credit.--The Secretary shall credit, in 
                accordance with section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 
                1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), toward the non-Federal share 
                of the cost of the project the cost of work carried out 
                by the non-Federal interest for the project before the 
                date of the partnership agreement for the project.''; 
                and
            (3) by aligning the remainder of the text of subparagraph 
        (A) (as designated by paragraph (1) of this section) with 
        subparagraph (B) (as added by paragraph (2) of this section).
SEC. 5122. CLINTON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA.

    Section 219(f)(13) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1992 <<NOTE: 106 Stat. 4835.>> (113 Stat. 335) is amended by striking 
``$1,000,000'' and inserting ``$2,000,000''.
SEC. 5123. KEHLY RUN DAMS, PENNSYLVANIA.

    Section 504(a)(2) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 
(113 Stat. 338; 117 Stat. 1842) is amended by striking ``Dams'' and 
inserting ``Dams No. 1-5''.
SEC. 5124. LEHIGH RIVER, LEHIGH COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA.

    The Secretary shall use existing water quality data to model the 
effects of the Francis E. Walter Dam, at different water levels, to 
determine its impact on water and related resources in and

[[Page 121 STAT. 1241]]

along the Lehigh River in Lehigh County, Pennsylvania. There is 
authorized to be appropriated $500,000 to carry out this section.
SEC. 5125. NORTHEAST PENNSYLVANIA.

    Section 219(f)(11) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1992 <<NOTE: 106 Stat. 4835.>> (113 Stat. 335) is amended by striking 
``and Monroe'' and inserting ``Northumberland, Union, Snyder, Luzerne, 
and Monroe''.
SEC. 5126. UPPER SUSQUEHANNA RIVER BASIN, PENNSYLVANIA AND NEW 
                          YORK.

    (a) Study and Strategy Development.--Section 567(a) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3787; 114 Stat. 2662) is 
amended--
            (1) in the matter preceding paragraph (1) by inserting ``and 
        carry out'' after ``develop''; and
            (2) in paragraph (2) by striking ``$10,000,000.'' and 
        inserting ``$20,000,000, of which the Secretary may utilize not 
        more than $5,000,000 to design and construct feasible pilot 
        projects during the development of the strategy to demonstrate 
        alternative approaches for the strategy. The total cost for any 
        single pilot project may not exceed $500,000. The Secretary 
        shall evaluate the results of the pilot projects and consider 
        the results in the development of the strategy.''.

    (b) Partnership Agreements.--Section 567(c) of such Act (114 Stat. 
2662) is amended--
            (1) in the subsection heading by striking ``Cooperation'' 
        and inserting ``Partnership''; and
            (2) in the first sentence--
                    (A) by inserting ``and carrying out'' after 
                ``developing''; and
                    (B) by striking ``cooperation'' and inserting 
                ``cost-sharing and partnership''.

    (c) Implementation of Strategy.--Section 567(d) of such Act (114 
Stat. 2663) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``The Secretary'' and inserting the 
        following:
            ``(1) In general.--The Secretary'';
            (2) in the second sentence of paragraph (1) (as so 
        designated)--
                    (A) by striking ``implement'' and inserting ``carry 
                out''; and
                    (B) by striking ``implementing'' and inserting 
                ``carrying out'';
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(2) Priority project.--In carrying out projects to 
        implement the strategy, the Secretary shall give priority to the 
        project for ecosystem restoration, Cooperstown, New York, 
        described in the Upper Susquehanna River Basin--Cooperstown Area 
        Ecosystem Restoration Feasibility Study, dated December 2004, 
        prepared by the Corps of Engineers and the New York State 
        department of environmental conservation.''; and
            (4) by aligning the remainder of the text of paragraph (1) 
        (as designated by paragraph (1) of this subsection) with 
        paragraph (2) (as added by paragraph (3) of this subsection).

    (d) Credit.--Section 567 of such Act (110 Stat. 3787; 114 Stat. 
2662) is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(e) Credit.--The Secretary shall credit toward the non-Federal 
share of the cost of a project under this section--

[[Page 121 STAT. 1242]]

            ``(1) in accordance with section 221 of the Flood Control 
        Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), the cost of design and 
        construction work carried out by the non-Federal interest for 
        the project before the date of the partnership agreement for the 
        project; and
            ``(2) the cost of in-kind services and materials provided 
        for the project by the non-Federal interest.''.
SEC. 5127. <<NOTE: Reports.>> CANO MARTIN PENA, SAN JUAN, PUERTO 
                          RICO.

    The Secretary shall review a report prepared by the non-Federal 
interest concerning flood protection and environmental restoration for 
Cano Martin Pena, San Juan, Puerto Rico, and, if the Secretary 
determines that the report meets the evaluation and design standards of 
the Corps of Engineers and that the project is feasible, the Secretary 
may carry out the project at a total cost of $150,000,000.
SEC. 5128. LAKES MARION AND MOULTRIE, SOUTH CAROLINA.

    Section 219(f)(25) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1992 <<NOTE: 106 Stat. 4835.>> (113 Stat. 336; 114 Stat. 2763A-220; 117 
Stat. 1838) is amended by striking ``$35,000,000'' and inserting 
``$60,000,000''.
SEC. 5129. CHEYENNE RIVER SIOUX TRIBE, LOWER BRULE SIOUX TRIBE, 
                          AND TERRESTRIAL WILDLIFE HABITAT 
                          RESTORATION, SOUTH DAKOTA.

    (a) Disbursement Provisions of State of South Dakota and Cheyenne 
River Sioux Tribe and Lower Brule Sioux Tribe Terrestrial Wildlife 
Habitat Restoration Trust Funds.--Section 602(a)(4) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 386) is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (A)--
                    (A) in clause (i) by inserting ``and the Secretary 
                of the Treasury'' after ``Secretary''; and
                    (B) by striking clause (ii) and inserting the 
                following:
                          ``(ii) Availability of funds.--On notification 
                      in accordance with clause (i), the Secretary of 
                      the Treasury shall make available to the State of 
                      South Dakota funds from the State of South Dakota 
                      Terrestrial Wildlife Habitat Restoration Trust 
                      Fund established under section 603 to be used to 
                      carry out the plan for terrestrial wildlife 
                      habitat restoration submitted by the State of 
                      South Dakota after the State certifies to the 
                      Secretary of the Treasury that the funds to be 
                      disbursed will be used in accordance with section 
                      603(d)(3) and only after the Trust Fund is fully 
                      capitalized.''; and
            (2) in subparagraph (B) by striking clause (ii) and 
        inserting the following:
                          ``(ii) Availability of funds.--On notification 
                      in accordance with clause (i), the Secretary of 
                      the Treasury shall make available to the Cheyenne 
                      River Sioux Tribe and the Lower Brule Sioux Tribe 
                      funds from the Cheyenne River Sioux Terrestrial 
                      Wildlife Habitat Restoration Trust Fund and the 
                      Lower Brule Sioux Terrestrial Wildlife Habitat 
                      Restoration Trust Fund, respectively, established 
                      under section 604, to be used to carry out the 
                      plans for terrestrial wildlife habitat restoration 
                      submitted by the Cheyenne River

[[Page 121 STAT. 1243]]

                      Sioux Tribe and the Lower Brule Sioux Tribe, 
                      respectively, to after the respective tribe 
                      certifies to the Secretary of the Treasury that 
                      the funds to be disbursed will be used in 
                      accordance with section 604(d)(3) and only after 
                      the Trust Fund is fully capitalized.''.

    (b) Investment Provisions of the State of South Dakota Terrestrial 
Wildlife Restoration Trust Fund.--Section 603 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 388; 114 Stat. 2664) is amended--
            (1) by striking subsection (c) and inserting the following:

    ``(c) Investments.--
            ``(1) Eligible obligations.--Notwithstanding any other 
        provision of law, the Secretary of the Treasury shall invest the 
        amounts deposited under subsection (b) and the interest earned 
        on those amounts only in interest-bearing obligations of the 
        United States issued directly to the Fund.
            ``(2) Investment requirements.--
                    ``(A) In general.--The Secretary of the Treasury 
                shall invest the amounts in the Fund in accordance with 
                the requirements of this paragraph.
                    ``(B) Separate investments of principal and 
                interest.--
                          ``(i) Principal account.--The amounts 
                      deposited in the Fund under subsection (b) shall 
                      be credited to an account within the Fund 
                      (referred to in this paragraph as the `principal 
                      account') and invested as provided in subparagraph 
                      (C).
                          ``(ii) Interest account.--The interest earned 
                      from investing amounts in the principal account of 
                      the Fund shall be transferred to a separate 
                      account within the Fund (referred to in this 
                      paragraph as the `interest account') and invested 
                      as provided in subparagraph (D).
                          ``(iii) Crediting.--The interest earned from 
                      investing amounts in the interest account of the 
                      Fund shall be credited to the interest account.
                    ``(C) Investment of principal account.--
                          ``(i) Initial investment.--Each amount 
                      deposited in the principal account of the Fund 
                      shall be invested initially in eligible 
                      obligations having the shortest maturity then 
                      available until the date on which the amount is 
                      divided into 3 substantially equal portions and 
                      those portions are invested in eligible 
                      obligations that are identical (except for 
                      transferability) to the next-issued publicly 
                      issued Treasury obligations having a 2-year 
                      maturity, a 5-year maturity, and a 10-year 
                      maturity, respectively.
                          ``(ii) Subsequent investment.--As each 2-year, 
                      5-year, and 10-year eligible obligation matures, 
                      the principal of the maturing eligible obligation 
                      shall also be invested initially in the shortest-
                      maturity eligible obligation then available until 
                      the principal is reinvested substantially equally 
                      in the eligible obligations that are identical 
                      (except for transferability) to the next-issued 
                      publicly issued Treasury obligations having 2-
                      year, 5-year, and 10-year maturities.

[[Page 121 STAT. 1244]]

                          ``(iii) Discontinuance of issuance of 
                      obligations.--If the Department of the Treasury 
                      discontinues issuing to the public obligations 
                      having 2-year, 5-year, or 10-year maturities, the 
                      principal of any maturing eligible obligation 
                      shall be reinvested substantially equally in 
                      eligible obligations that are identical (except 
                      for transferability) to the next-issued publicly 
                      issued Treasury obligations of the maturities 
                      longer than 1 year then available.
                    ``(D) Investment of interest account.--
                          ``(i) Before full capitalization.--Until the 
                      date on which the Fund is fully capitalized, 
                      amounts in the interest account of the Fund shall 
                      be invested in eligible obligations that are 
                      identical (except for transferability) to publicly 
                      issued Treasury obligations that have maturities 
                      that coincide, to the maximum extent practicable, 
                      with the date on which the Fund is expected to be 
                      fully capitalized.
                          ``(ii) After full capitalization.--On and 
                      after the date on which the Fund is fully 
                      capitalized, amounts in the interest account of 
                      the Fund shall be invested and reinvested in 
                      eligible obligations having the shortest maturity 
                      then available until the amounts are withdrawn and 
                      transferred to fund the activities authorized 
                      under subsection (d)(3).
                    ``(E) Par purchase price.--The price to be paid for 
                eligible obligations purchased as investments of the 
                principal account shall not exceed the par value of the 
                obligations so that the amount of the principal account 
                shall be preserved in perpetuity.
                    ``(F) Highest yield.--Among eligible obligations 
                having the same maturity and purchase price, the 
                obligation to be purchased shall be the obligation 
                having the highest yield.
                    ``(G) Holding to maturity.--Eligible obligations 
                purchased shall generally be held to their maturities.
            ``(3) Annual review of investment activities.--Not less 
        frequently than once each calendar year, the Secretary of the 
        Treasury shall review with the State of South Dakota the results 
        of the investment activities and financial status of the Fund 
        during the preceding 12-month period.
            ``(4) Audits.--
                    ``(A) In general.--The activities of the State of 
                South Dakota (referred to in this subsection as the 
                `State') in carrying out the plan of the State for 
                terrestrial wildlife habitat restoration under section 
                602(a) shall be audited as part of the annual audit that 
                the State is required to prepare under the Office of 
                Management and Budget Circular A-133 (or a successor 
                circulation).
                    ``(B) Determination by auditors.--An auditor that 
                conducts an audit under subparagraph (A) shall--
                          ``(i) determine whether funds received by the 
                      State under this section during the period covered 
                      by the audit were used to carry out the plan of 
                      the State in accordance with this section; and
                          ``(ii) include the determination under clause 
                      (i) in the written findings of the audit.

[[Page 121 STAT. 1245]]

            ``(5) Modification of investment requirements.--
                    ``(A) In general.--If the Secretary of the Treasury 
                determines that meeting the requirements under paragraph 
                (2) with respect to the investment of a Fund is not 
                practicable, or would result in adverse consequences for 
                the Fund, the Secretary shall modify the requirements, 
                as the Secretary determines to be necessary.
                    ``(B) Consultation.--Before modifying a requirement 
                under subparagraph (A), the Secretary of the Treasury 
                shall consult with the State regarding the proposed 
                modification.'';
            (2) in subsection (d)(2) by inserting ``of the Treasury'' 
        after ``Secretary''; and
            (3) by striking subsection (f) and inserting the following:

    ``(f) <<NOTE: Appropriation authorization.>> Administrative 
Expenses.--There are authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary of 
the Treasury to pay expenses associated with investing the Fund and 
auditing the uses of amounts withdrawn from the Fund--
            ``(1) $500,000 for each of fiscal years 2006 and 2007; and
            ``(2) such sums as are necessary for each subsequent fiscal 
        year.''.

    (c) Investment Provisions for Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe and Lower 
Brule Sioux Tribe Trust Funds.--Section 604 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 389; 114 Stat. 2665) is amended--
            (1) by striking subsection (c) and inserting the following:

    ``(c) Investments.--
            ``(1) Eligible obligations.--Notwithstanding any other 
        provision of law, the Secretary of the Treasury shall invest the 
        amounts deposited under subsection (b) and the interest earned 
        on those amounts only in interest-bearing obligations of the 
        United States issued directly to the Funds.
            ``(2) Investment requirements.--
                    ``(A) In general.--The Secretary of the Treasury 
                shall invest the amounts in each of the Funds in 
                accordance with the requirements of this paragraph.
                    ``(B) Separate investments of principal and 
                interest.--
                          ``(i) Principal account.--The amounts 
                      deposited in each Fund under subsection (b) shall 
                      be credited to an account within the Fund 
                      (referred to in this paragraph as the `principal 
                      account') and invested as provided in subparagraph 
                      (C).
                          ``(ii) Interest account.--The interest earned 
                      from investing amounts in the principal account of 
                      each Fund shall be transferred to a separate 
                      account within the Fund (referred to in this 
                      paragraph as the `interest account') and invested 
                      as provided in subparagraph (D).
                          ``(iii) Crediting.--The interest earned from 
                      investing amounts in the interest account of each 
                      Fund shall be credited to the interest account.
                    ``(C) Investment of principal account.--
                          ``(i) Initial investment.--Each amount 
                      deposited in the principal account of each Fund 
                      shall be invested initially in eligible 
                      obligations having the shortest maturity then 
                      available until the date on which the

[[Page 121 STAT. 1246]]

                      amount is divided into 3 substantially equal 
                      portions and those portions are invested in 
                      eligible obligations that are identical (except 
                      for transferability) to the next-issued publicly 
                      issued Treasury obligations having a 2-year 
                      maturity, a 5-year maturity, and a 10-year 
                      maturity, respectively.
                          ``(ii) Subsequent investment.--As each 2-year, 
                      5-year, and 10-year eligible obligation matures, 
                      the principal of the maturing eligible obligation 
                      shall also be invested initially in the shortest-
                      maturity eligible obligation then available until 
                      the principal is reinvested substantially equally 
                      in the eligible obligations that are identical 
                      (except for transferability) to the next-issued 
                      publicly issued Treasury obligations having 2-
                      year, 5-year, and 10-year maturities.
                          ``(iii) Discontinuation of issuance of 
                      obligations.--If the Department of the Treasury 
                      discontinues issuing to the public obligations 
                      having 2-year, 5-year, or 10-year maturities, the 
                      principal of any maturing eligible obligation 
                      shall be reinvested substantially equally in 
                      eligible obligations that are identical (except 
                      for transferability) to the next-issued publicly 
                      issued Treasury obligations of the maturities 
                      longer than 1 year then available.
                    ``(D) Investment of interest account.--
                          ``(i) Before full capitalization.--Until the 
                      date on which each Fund is fully capitalized, 
                      amounts in the interest account of the Fund shall 
                      be invested in eligible obligations that are 
                      identical (except for transferability) to publicly 
                      issued Treasury obligations that have maturities 
                      that coincide, to the maximum extent practicable, 
                      with the date on which the Fund is expected to be 
                      fully capitalized.
                          ``(ii) After full capitalization.--On and 
                      after the date on which each Fund is fully 
                      capitalized, amounts in the interest account of 
                      the Fund shall be invested and reinvested in 
                      eligible obligations having the shortest maturity 
                      then available until the amounts are withdrawn and 
                      transferred to fund the activities authorized 
                      under subsection (d)(3).
                    ``(E) Par purchase price.--The price to be paid for 
                eligible obligations purchased as investments of the 
                principal account shall not exceed the par value of the 
                obligations so that the amount of the principal account 
                shall be preserved in perpetuity.
                    ``(F) Highest yield.--Among eligible obligations 
                having the same maturity and purchase price, the 
                obligation to be purchased shall be the obligation 
                having the highest yield.
                    ``(G) Holding to maturity.--Eligible obligations 
                purchased shall generally be held to their maturities.
            ``(3) Annual review of investment activities.--Not less 
        frequently than once each calendar year, the Secretary of the 
        Treasury shall review with the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe and 
        the Lower Brule Sioux Tribe (referred to in this subsection as 
        the `Tribes') the results of the investment activities and

[[Page 121 STAT. 1247]]

        financial status of the Funds during the preceding 12-month 
        period.
            ``(4) Audits.--
                    ``(A) In general.--The activities of the Tribes in 
                carrying out the plans of the Tribes for terrestrial 
                wildlife habitat restoration under section 602(a) shall 
                be audited as part of the annual audit that the Tribes 
                are required to prepare under the Office of Management 
                and Budget Circular A-133 (or a successor circulation).
                    ``(B) Determination by auditors.--An auditor that 
                conducts an audit under subparagraph (A) shall--
                          ``(i) determine whether funds received by the 
                      Tribes under this section during the period 
                      covered by the audit were used to carry out the 
                      plan of the appropriate Tribe in accordance with 
                      this section; and
                          ``(ii) include the determination under clause 
                      (i) in the written findings of the audit.
            ``(5) Modification of investment requirements.--
                    ``(A) In general.--If the Secretary of the Treasury 
                determines that meeting the requirements under paragraph 
                (2) with respect to the investment of a Fund is not 
                practicable, or would result in adverse consequences for 
                the Fund, the Secretary shall modify the requirements, 
                as the Secretary determines to be necessary.
                    ``(B) Consultation.--Before modifying a requirement 
                under subparagraph (A), the Secretary of the Treasury 
                shall consult with the Tribes regarding the proposed 
                modification.''; and
            (2) by striking subsection (f) and inserting the following:

    ``(f) Administrative Expenses.--There are authorized to be 
appropriated to the Secretary of the Treasury to pay expenses associated 
with investing the Funds and auditing the uses of amounts withdrawn from 
the Funds--
            ``(1) $500,000 for each of fiscal years 2006 and 2007; and
            ``(2) such sums as are necessary for each subsequent fiscal 
        year.''.
SEC. 5130. EAST TENNESSEE.

    (a) East Tennessee Defined.--In this section, the term ``East 
Tennessee'' means the counties of Blount, Knox, Loudon, McMinn, Monroe, 
and Sevier, Tennessee.
    (b) Establishment of Program.--The Secretary may establish a program 
to provide environmental assistance to non-Federal interests in East 
Tennessee.
    (c) Form of Assistance.--Assistance provided under this section may 
be in the form of design and construction assistance for water-related 
environmental infrastructure and resource protection and development 
projects in East Tennessee, including projects for wastewater treatment 
and related facilities, water supply and related facilities, 
environmental restoration, and surface water resource protection and 
development.
    (d) Ownership Requirement.--The Secretary may provide assistance for 
a project under this section only if the project is publicly owned.
    (e) Partnership Agreements.--
            (1) In general.--Before providing assistance under this 
        section, the Secretary shall enter into a partnership agreement

[[Page 121 STAT. 1248]]

        with a non-Federal interest to provide for design and 
        construction of the project to be carried out with the 
        assistance.
            (2) Requirements.--Each partnership agreement for a project 
        entered into under this subsection shall provide for the 
        following:
                    (A) Plan.--Development by the Secretary, in 
                consultation with appropriate Federal and State 
                officials, of a facilities or resource protection and 
                development plan, including appropriate engineering 
                plans and specifications.
                    (B) Legal and institutional structures.--
                Establishment of such legal and institutional structures 
                as are necessary to ensure the effective long-term 
                operation of the project by the non-Federal interest.
            (3) Cost sharing.--
                    (A) In general.--The Federal share of the cost of a 
                project under this section--
                          (i) shall be 75 percent; and
                          (ii) may be provided in the form of grants or 
                      reimbursements of project costs.
                    (B) Credit for work.--The Secretary shall credit, in 
                accordance with section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 
                1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), toward the non-Federal share 
                of the cost of the project the cost of design work 
                carried out by the non-Federal interest for the project 
                before the date of the partnership agreement for the 
                project.
                    (C) Credit for interest.--In case of a delay in the 
                funding of the non-Federal share of a project that is 
                the subject of an agreement under this section, the non-
                Federal interest shall receive credit for reasonable 
                interest incurred in providing the non-Federal share of 
                the project cost.
                    (D) Credit for land, easements, and rights-of-way.--
                The non-Federal interest shall receive credit for land, 
                easements, rights-of-way, and relocations toward the 
                non-Federal share of project cost (including all 
                reasonable costs associated with obtaining permits 
                necessary for the construction, operation, and 
                maintenance of the project on publicly owned or 
                controlled land), but the credit may not exceed 25 
                percent of total project costs.
                    (E) Operation and maintenance.--The non-Federal 
                share of operation and maintenance costs for projects 
                constructed with assistance provided under this section 
                shall be 100 percent.

    (f) Applicability of Other Federal and State Laws.--Nothing in this 
section shall be construed to waive, limit, or otherwise affect the 
applicability of any provision of Federal or State law that would 
otherwise apply to a project to be carried out with assistance provided 
under this section.
    (g) Nonprofit Entities.--In accordance with section 221(b) of the 
Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b(b)), for any project 
carried out under this section, a non-Federal interest may include a 
nonprofit entity with the consent of the affected local government.
    (h) Corps of Engineers Expenses.--Not more than 10 percent of the 
amounts appropriated to carry out this section may be used by the Corps 
of Engineers district offices to administer projects under this section 
at Federal expense.

[[Page 121 STAT. 1249]]

    (i) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $40,000,000.
SEC. 5131. <<NOTE: Study.>> FRITZ LANDING, TENNESSEE.

    The Secretary shall--
            (1) conduct a study of the Fritz Landing Agricultural Spur 
        Levee, Tennessee, to determine the extent of levee modifications 
        that would be required to make the levee and associated drainage 
        structures consistent with Federal standards;
            (2) design and construct such modifications; and
            (3) after completion of such modifications, incorporate the 
        levee into the project for flood control, Mississippi River and 
        Tributaries, authorized by the Act entitled ``An Act for the 
        control of floods on the Mississippi River and its tributaries, 
        and for other purposes'', approved May 15, 1928 (45 Stat. 534-
        539).
SEC. 5132. <<NOTE: National Trail System.>> J. PERCY PRIEST DAM 
                          AND RESERVOIR, TENNESSEE.

    The Secretary shall plan, design, and construct a trail system at 
the J. Percy Priest Dam and Reservoir, Tennessee, authorized by section 
4 of the Act entitled ``An Act authorizing the construction of certain 
public works on rivers and harbors for flood control, and for other 
purposes'', approved June 28, 1938 (52 Stat. 1217), and adjacent public 
property, including design and construction of support facilities. In 
carrying out such improvements, the Secretary is authorized to use funds 
made available by the State of Tennessee from any Federal or State 
source, or both.
SEC. 5133. NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary may participate in the ecosystem 
restoration, recreation, navigation, and flood damage reduction 
components of the Nashville Riverfront Concept Plan, dated February 
2007.
    (b) Coordination.--In carrying out this section, the Secretary shall 
coordinate with appropriate representatives in the vicinity of 
Nashville, Tennessee, including the Nashville Parks and Recreation 
Department, the city of Nashville, and Davidson County.
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated $10,000,000 to carry out this section.
SEC. 5134. NONCONNAH WEIR, MEMPHIS, TENNESSEE.

    The project for flood control, Nonconnah Creek, Tennessee and 
Mississippi, authorized by section 401 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4124) and modified by the section 334 
of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2611), is 
modified to authorize the Secretary--
            (1) to reconstruct, at Federal expense, the weir originally 
        constructed in the vicinity of the mouth of Nonconnah Creek; and
            (2) to make repairs and maintain the weir in the future so 
        that the weir functions properly.
SEC. 5135. TENNESSEE RIVER PARTNERSHIP.

    (a) In General.--As part of the operation and maintenance of the 
project for navigation, Tennessee River, Tennessee, Alabama, 
Mississippi, and Kentucky, authorized by the first section of the River 
and Harbor Act of July 3, 1930 (46 Stat. 927), the Secretary may enter 
into a partnership with a nonprofit entity to remove

[[Page 121 STAT. 1250]]

debris from the Tennessee River in the vicinity of Knoxville, Tennessee, 
by providing a vessel to such entity, at Federal expense, for such 
debris removal purposes.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $500,000.
SEC. 5136. TOWN CREEK, LENOIR CITY, TENNESSEE.

    The Secretary shall design and construct the project for flood 
damage reduction designated as Alternative 4 in the Town Creek, Lenoir 
City, Loudon County, Tennessee, feasibility report of the Nashville 
district engineer, dated November 2000, under the authority of section 
205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s), notwithstanding 
section 1 of the Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936 (33 U.S.C. 701a; 49 
Stat. 1570). The non-Federal share of the cost of the project shall be 
subject to section 103(m) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 
(33 U.S.C. 2213(m)).
SEC. 5137. UPPER MISSISSIPPI EMBAYMENT, TENNESSEE, ARKANSAS, AND 
                          MISSISSIPPI.

    The Secretary may participate with non-Federal and nonprofit 
entities to address issues concerning managing groundwater as a 
sustainable resource through the Upper Mississippi Embayment, Tennessee, 
Arkansas, and Mississippi, and to coordinate the protection of 
groundwater supply and groundwater quality of the Embayment with local 
surface water protection programs. <<NOTE: Appropriation 
authorization.>> There is authorized to be appropriated $5,000,000 to 
carry out this section.
SEC. 5138. TEXAS.

    (a) Establishment of Program.--The Secretary shall establish a 
program to provide environmental assistance to non-Federal interests in 
the State of Texas.
    (b) Form of Assistance.--Assistance provided under this section may 
be in the form of planning, design, and construction assistance for 
water-related environmental infrastructure and resource protection and 
development projects in Texas, including projects for water supply, 
storage, treatment, and related facilities, water quality protection, 
wastewater treatment, and related facilities, environmental restoration, 
and surface water resource protection, and development, as identified by 
the Texas Water Development Board.
    (c) Ownership Requirement.--The Secretary may provide assistance for 
a project under this section only if the project is publicly owned.
    (d) Partnership Agreements.--Before providing assistance under this 
section, the Secretary shall enter into a partnership agreement with a 
non-Federal interest.
    (e) Cost Sharing.--
            (1) In general.--The Federal share of the cost of the 
        project under this section--
                    (A) shall be 75 percent; and
                    (B) may be provided in the form of grants or 
                reimbursements of project costs.
            (2) In-kind services.--The non-Federal share may be provided 
        in the form of materials and in-kind services, including 
        planning, design, construction, and management services, as the 
        Secretary determines to be compatible with, and necessary for, 
        the project.

[[Page 121 STAT. 1251]]

            (3) Credit for work.--The Secretary shall credit, in 
        accordance with section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 
        U.S.C. 1962d-5b), toward the non-Federal share of the cost of 
        the project the cost of design work carried out by the non-
        Federal interest for the project before the date of the 
        partnership agreement for the project.
            (4) Credit for land, easements, and rights-of-way.--The non-
        Federal interest shall receive credit for land, easements, 
        rights-of-way, and relocations toward the non-Federal share of 
        project costs.
            (5) Operation and maintenance.--The non-Federal share of 
        operation and maintenance costs for projects constructed with 
        assistance provided under this section shall be 100 percent.

    (f) Applicability of Other Federal and State Laws.--Nothing in this 
section shall be construed to waive, limit, or otherwise affect the 
applicability of any provision of Federal or State law that would 
otherwise apply to a project to be carried out with assistance provided 
under this section.
    (g) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $40,000,000.
SEC. 5139. BOSQUE RIVER WATERSHED, TEXAS.

    (a) Comprehensive Plan.--The Secretary, in consultation with 
appropriate Federal, State, and local entities, shall develop, as 
expeditiously as practicable, a comprehensive plan for development of 
new technologies and innovative approaches for restoring, preserving, 
and protecting the Bosque River watershed within Bosque, Hamilton, 
McLennan, and Erath Counties, Texas. The Secretary, in cooperation with 
the Secretary of Agriculture, may carry out activities identified in the 
comprehensive plan to demonstrate practicable alternatives for 
stabilization and enhancement of land and water resources in the basin.
    (b) Services of Nonprofit Institutions and Other Entities.--In 
carrying out subsection (a), the Secretary may utilize, through 
contracts or other means, the services of nonprofit institutions and 
such other entities as the Secretary considers appropriate.
    (c) Non-Federal Share.--
            (1) Credit.--The Secretary shall credit, in accordance with 
        section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-
        5b), toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the project the 
        cost of planning, design, and construction work carried out by 
        the non-Federal interest for the project before the date of the 
        partnership agreement for the project.
            (2) Development of comprehensive plan.--The non-Federal 
        share of the cost of development of the plan under subsection 
        (a) shall be 25 percent.
            (3) Operation and maintenance.--The non-Federal share of the 
        cost of operation and maintenance for measures constructed with 
        assistance provided under this section shall be 100 percent.

    (d) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $10,000,000.
SEC. 5140. DALLAS COUNTY REGION, TEXAS.

    (a) Dallas County Region Defined.--In this section, the term 
``Dallas County region'' means the city of Dallas, and the 
municipalities of DeSoto, Duncanville, Lancaster, Wilmer, Hutchins, 
Balch Springs, Cedar Hill, Glenn Heights, and Ferris, Texas.

[[Page 121 STAT. 1252]]

    (b) Establishment of Program.--The Secretary may establish a program 
to provide environmental assistance to non-Federal interests in the 
Dallas County region.
    (c) Form of Assistance.--Assistance provided under this section may 
be in the form of design and construction assistance for water-related 
environmental infrastructure and resource protection and development 
projects in the Dallas County region, including projects for wastewater 
treatment and related facilities, water supply and related facilities, 
environmental restoration, and surface water resource protection and 
development.
    (d) Ownership Requirement.--The Secretary may provide assistance for 
a project under this section only if the project is publicly owned.
    (e) Partnership Agreements.--
            (1) In general.--Before providing assistance under this 
        section, the Secretary shall enter into a partnership agreement 
        with a non-Federal interest to provide for design and 
        construction of the project to be carried out with the 
        assistance.
            (2) Requirements.--Each partnership agreement for a project 
        entered into under this subsection shall provide for the 
        following:
                    (A) Plan.--Development by the Secretary, in 
                consultation with appropriate Federal and State 
                officials, of a facilities or resource protection and 
                development plan, including appropriate engineering 
                plans and specifications.
                    (B) Legal and institutional structures.--
                Establishment of such legal and institutional structures 
                as are necessary to ensure the effective long-term 
                operation of the project by the non-Federal interest.
            (3) Cost sharing.--
                    (A) In general.--The Federal share of the cost of a 
                project under this section--
                          (i) shall be 75 percent; and
                          (ii) may be provided in the form of grants or 
                      reimbursements of project costs.
                    (B) Credit for work.--The Secretary shall credit, in 
                accordance with section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 
                1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), toward the non-Federal share 
                of the cost of the project the cost design work carried 
                out by the non-Federal interest for the project before 
                the date of the partnership agreement for the project.
                    (C) Credit for interest.--In case of a delay in the 
                funding of the non-Federal share of a project that is 
                the subject of an agreement under this section, the non-
                Federal interest shall receive credit for reasonable 
                interest incurred in providing the non-Federal share.
                    (D) Credit for land, easements, and rights-of-way.--
                The non-Federal interest shall receive credit for land, 
                easements, rights-of-way, and relocations toward the 
                non-Federal share of project costs (including all 
                reasonable costs associated with obtaining permits 
                necessary for the construction, operation, and 
                maintenance of the project on publicly owned or 
                controlled land), but the credit may not exceed 25 
                percent of total project costs.

[[Page 121 STAT. 1253]]

                    (E) Operation and maintenance.--The non-Federal 
                share of operation and maintenance costs for projects 
                constructed with assistance provided under this section 
                shall be 100 percent.

    (f) Applicability of Other Federal and State Laws.--Nothing in this 
section shall be construed to waive, limit, or otherwise affect the 
applicability of any provision of Federal or State law that would 
otherwise apply to a project to be carried out with assistance provided 
under this section.
    (g) Nonprofit Entities.--In accordance with section 221(b) of the 
Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b(b)), for any project 
carried out under this section, a non-Federal interest may include a 
nonprofit entity with the consent of the affected local government.
    (h) Corps of Engineers Expenses.--Not more than 10 percent of the 
amounts appropriated to carry out this section may be used by the Corps 
of Engineers district offices to administer projects under this section 
at Federal expense.
    (i) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $40,000,000.
SEC. 5141. DALLAS FLOODWAY, DALLAS, TEXAS.

    (a) In General.--The project for flood control, Trinity River and 
tributaries, Texas, authorized by section 2 of the Act entitled, ``An 
Act authorizing the construction, repair, and preservation of certain 
public works on rivers and harbors, and for other purposes'', approved 
March 2, 1945 (59 Stat. 18), is modified to--
            (1) direct the Secretary to review the Balanced Vision Plan 
        for the Trinity River Corridor, Dallas, Texas, dated December 
        2003 and amended in March 2004, prepared by the non-Federal 
        interest for the project;
            (2) direct the Secretary to review the Interior Levee 
        Drainage Study Phase-I report, Dallas, Texas, dated September 
        2006, prepared by the non-Federal interest; and
            (3) if the Secretary determines that the project is 
        technically sound and environmentally acceptable, authorize the 
        Secretary to construct the project at a total cost of 
        $459,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $298,000,000 and 
        an estimated non-Federal cost of $161,000,000.

    (b) Credit.--
            (1) In-kind contributions.--The Secretary shall credit, in 
        accordance with section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 
        U.S.C. 1962d-5b), toward the non-Federal share of the cost of 
        the project the cost of planning, design, and construction work 
        carried out by the non-Federal interest for the project before 
        the date of the partnership agreement for the project.
            (2) Cash contributions.--The Secretary shall accept funds 
        provided by the non-Federal interest for use in carrying out 
        planning, engineering, and design for the project. The Federal 
        share of such planning, engineering, and design carried out with 
        non-Federal contributions shall be credited against the non-
        Federal share of the cost of the project.
SEC. 5142. HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS.

    Section 575(b) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 
Stat. 3789; 113 Stat. 311) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (3) by striking ``and'' at the end;

[[Page 121 STAT. 1254]]

            (2) in paragraph (4) by striking the period at the end and 
        inserting ``; and''; and
            (3) by adding the following:
            ``(5) the project for flood control, Upper White Oak Bayou, 
        Texas, authorized by section 401(a) of the Water Resources 
        Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4125).''.
SEC. 5143. JOHNSON CREEK, ARLINGTON, TEXAS.

    (a) In General.--The project for flood damage reduction, 
environmental restoration, and recreation, Johnson Creek, Arlington, 
Texas, authorized by section 101(b)(14) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat 280), is modified to authorize the 
Secretary to construct the project substantially in accordance with the 
report entitled ``Johnson Creek: A Vision of Conservation'', dated March 
30, 2006, at a total cost of $80,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost 
of $52,000,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $28,000,000, if the 
Secretary determines that the project is feasible.
    (b) Non-Federal Share.--
            (1) In general.--The non-Federal share of the cost of the 
        project may be provided in cash or in the form of in-kind 
        services or materials.
            (2) Credit.--The Secretary shall credit, in accordance with 
        section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-
        5b), toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the project the 
        cost of planning, design, and construction work carried out by 
        the non-Federal interest for the project before the date of the 
        partnership agreement for the project.

    (c) Special Rule.--In evaluating and implementing the project, the 
Secretary shall allow the non-Federal interest to participate in the 
financing of the project in accordance with section 903(c) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4184).
    (d) Conforming Amendment.--Section 134 of the Energy and Water 
Development Appropriations Act, 2006 (119 Stat. 2263) is repealed.
SEC. 5144. ONION CREEK, TEXAS.

    (a) <<NOTE: Study.>> Inclusion of Costs and Benefits of Relocation 
of Flood-Prone Residences.--In carrying out the study for the project 
for flood damage reduction, recreation, and ecosystem restoration, Onion 
Creek, Texas, the Secretary shall include the costs and benefits 
associated with the relocation of flood-prone residences in the study 
area for the project in the period beginning 2 years before the date of 
initiation of the study and ending on the date of execution of the 
partnership agreement for construction of the project to the extent the 
Secretary determines such relocations are compatible with the project.

    (b) Credit.--The Secretary shall credit, in accordance with section 
221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), toward the 
non-Federal share of the cost of the project referred to in subsection 
(a) the cost of relocation of those flood-prone residences described in 
subsection (a) that are incurred by the non-Federal interest before the 
date of the partnership agreement for the project.
SEC. 5145. CONNECTICUT RIVER DAMS, VERMONT.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall evaluate, design, and carry out 
structural modifications at Federal cost to the Union

[[Page 121 STAT. 1255]]

Village Dam (Ompompanoosuc River), North Hartland Dam (Ottauquechee 
River), North Springfield Dam (Black River), Ball Mountain Dam (West 
River), and Townshend Dam (West River), Vermont, to regulate flow and 
temperature to mitigate downstream impacts on aquatic habitat and 
fisheries.
    (b) Inclusion.--During the evaluation and design portion of the 
modifications authorized by this section, the Secretary shall ensure 
that a sustainable flow analysis is conducted for each dam.
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $30,000,000.
SEC. 5146. LAKE CHAMPLAIN CANAL, VERMONT AND NEW YORK.

    (a) Dispersal Barrier Project.--The Secretary shall determine, at 
Federal expense, the feasibility of a dispersal barrier project at the 
Lake Champlain Canal, Vermont and New York, to prevent the spread of 
aquatic nuisance species.
    (b) Construction, Maintenance, and Operation.--If the Secretary 
determines that the project described in subsection (a) is feasible, the 
Secretary shall construct, maintain, and operate a dispersal barrier at 
the Lake Champlain Canal at Federal expense.
SEC. 5147. DYKE MARSH, FAIRFAX COUNTY, VIRGINIA.

    The Secretary shall accept funds from the National Park Service to 
restore Dyke Marsh, Fairfax County, Virginia.
SEC. 5148. EASTERN SHORE AND SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA.

    Section 219(f)(10) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 
(106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 335) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``$20,000,000 for water supply and 
        wastewater infrastructure'' and inserting the following:
                    ``(A) In general.--$20,000,000 for water supply, 
                wastewater infrastructure, and environmental 
                restoration'';
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(B) Credit.--The Secretary shall credit, in 
                accordance with section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 
                1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), toward the non-Federal share 
                of the cost of the project the cost of work carried out 
                by the non-Federal interest for the project before the 
                date of the partnership agreement for the project.''; 
                and
            (3) by aligning the remainder of the text of subparagraph 
        (A) (as designated by paragraph (1) of this section) with 
        subparagraph (B) (as added by paragraph (2) of this section).
SEC. 5149. JAMES RIVER, VIRGINIA.

    The Secretary shall accept funds from the National Park Service to 
provide technical and project management assistance for the James River, 
Virginia, with a particular emphasis on locations along the shoreline 
adversely impacted by Hurricane Isabel.
SEC. 5150. <<NOTE: Study.>> BAKER BAY AND ILWACO HARBOR, 
                          WASHINGTON.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study of increased siltation in Baker 
Bay and Ilwaco Harbor, Washington, to determine if the siltation is the 
result of a Federal navigation project (including diverted flows from 
the Columbia River) and, if the Secretary determines that the siltation 
is the result of a Federal navigation project, the Secretary shall carry 
out a project to mitigate the siltation as part of maintenance of the 
Federal navigation project.

[[Page 121 STAT. 1256]]

SEC. 5151. HAMILTON ISLAND CAMPGROUND, WASHINGTON.

    The Secretary is authorized to plan, design, and construct a 
campground for Bonneville Lock and Dam at Hamilton Island (also known as 
``Strawberry Island'') in Skamania County, Washington.
SEC. 5152. EROSION CONTROL, PUGET ISLAND, WAHKIAKUM COUNTY, 
                          WASHINGTON.

    (a) In General.--The Lower Columbia River levees and bank protection 
works authorized by section 204 of the Flood Control Act of 1950 (64 
Stat. 178) is modified with regard to the Wahkiakum County diking 
districts No. 1 and 3, but without regard to any cost ceiling authorized 
before the date of enactment of this Act, to direct the Secretary to 
provide a one-time placement of dredged material along portions of the 
Columbia River shoreline of Puget Island, Washington, between river 
miles 38 to 47, and the shoreline of Westport Beach, Clatsop County, 
Oregon, between river miles 43 to 45, to protect economic and 
environmental resources in the area from further erosion.
    (b) Coordination and Cost-Sharing Requirements.--The Secretary shall 
carry out subsection (a)--
            (1) in coordination with appropriate resource agencies; and
            (2) at Federal expense.

    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $1,000,000.
SEC. 5153. WILLAPA BAY, WASHINGTON.

    Section 545 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 
Stat. 2675) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (b)(1) by striking ``may construct'' and 
        inserting ``shall construct''; and
            (2) by inserting ``and ecosystem restoration'' after 
        ``erosion protection'' each place it appears.
SEC. 5154. WEST VIRGINIA AND PENNSYLVANIA FLOOD CONTROL.

    (a) Cheat and Tygart River Basins, West Virginia.--Section 581(a)(1) 
of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3790; 113 
Stat. 313) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``flood control measures'' and inserting 
        ``structural and nonstructural flood control, streambank 
        protection, stormwater management, and channel clearing and 
        modification measures''; and
            (2) by inserting ``with respect to measures that incorporate 
        levees or floodwalls'' before the semicolon.

    (b) Priority Communities.--Section 581(b) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3791) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``and'' at the end of paragraph (5);
            (2) by striking the period at the end of paragraph (6) and 
        inserting a semicolon; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(7) Etna, Pennsylvania, in the Pine Creek watershed; and
            ``(8) Millvale, Pennsylvania, in the Girty's Run River 
        basin.''.

    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--Section 581(c) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3791) is amended by 
striking ``$12,000,000'' and inserting ``$90,000,000''.

[[Page 121 STAT. 1257]]

SEC. 5155. CENTRAL WEST VIRGINIA.

    Section 571 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 
Stat. 371) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)--
                    (A) by striking ``Nicholas,''; and
                    (B) by striking ``Gilmer,'';
            (2) in subsection (h) by striking ``$10,000,000'' and 
        inserting ``$20,000,000''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:

    ``(i) Nonprofit Entities.--In accordance with section 221(b) of the 
Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b(b)), for any project 
undertaken under this section, a non-Federal interest may include a 
nonprofit entity with the consent of the affected local government.
    ``(j) Corps of Engineers Expenses.--Not more than 10 percent of the 
amounts appropriated to carry out this section may be used by the Corps 
of Engineers district offices to administer projects under this section 
at Federal expense.''.
SEC. 5156. SOUTHERN WEST VIRGINIA.

    (a) Corps of Engineers.--Section 340 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4856; 113 Stat. 320) is amended by 
adding at the end the following:
    ``(h) Corps of Engineers.--Not more than 10 percent of the amounts 
appropriated to carry out this section may be used by the Corps of 
Engineers district offices to administer projects under this section at 
Federal expense.''.
    (b) Southern West Virginia Defined.--Section 340(f) of such Act is 
amended by inserting ``Nicholas,'' after ``Greenbrier,''.
    (c) Nonprofit Entities.--Section 340 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4856) is further amended by adding at 
the end the following:
    ``(i) Nonprofit Entities.--In accordance with section 221(b) of the 
Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b(b)), for any project 
carried out under this section, a non-Federal interest may include a 
nonprofit entity with the consent of the affected local government.''.
SEC. 5157. CONSTRUCTION OF FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS BY NON-FEDERAL 
                          INTERESTS.

    Section 211(f) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (33 
U.S.C. 701b-13) is amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``(12) Perris, california.--The project for flood control, 
        Perris, California.
            ``(13) Thornton reservoir, cook county, illinois.--An 
        element of the project for flood control, Chicagoland Underflow 
        Plan, Illinois.
            ``(14) Larose to golden meadow, louisiana.--The project for 
        flood control, Larose to Golden Meadow, Louisiana.
            ``(15) Buffalo bayou, texas.--A project for flood control, 
        Buffalo Bayou, Texas, to provide an alternative to the project 
        authorized by the first section of the River and Harbor Act of 
        June 20, 1938 (52 Stat. 804) and modified by section 3a of the 
        Flood Control Act of August 11, 1939 (53 Stat. 1414).
            ``(16) Halls bayou, texas.--A project for flood control, 
        Halls Bayou, Texas, to provide an alternative to the project

[[Page 121 STAT. 1258]]

        for flood control, Buffalo Bayou and tributaries, Texas, 
        authorized by section 101(a)(21) of the Water Resources 
        Development Act of 1990 (104 Stat. 4610).
            ``(17) Menomonee river watershed, wisconsin.--The project 
        for the Menomonee River Watershed, Wisconsin, including--
                    ``(A) the Underwood Creek diversion facility project 
                (Milwaukee County Grounds); and
                    ``(B) the Greater Milwaukee Rivers watershed 
                project.''.
SEC. 5158. ADDITIONAL ASSISTANCE FOR CRITICAL PROJECTS.

    Section 219 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 
Stat. 4835; 110 Stat. 3757; 113 Stat. 334; 113 Stat. 1494; 114 Stat. 
2763A-219; 119 Stat. 2255) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (c)(5) by striking ``a project for the 
        elimination or control of combined sewer overflows'' and 
        inserting ``projects for the design, installation, enhancement, 
        or repair of sewer systems'';
            (2) in subsection (e)(1) by striking ``$20,000,000'' and 
        inserting ``$32,500,000''; and
            (3) in subsection (f)--
                    (A) by striking the undesignated paragraph relating 
                to Charleston, South Carolina, and inserting the 
                following:
            ``(72) Charleston, south carolina.--$10,000,000 for 
        wastewater infrastructure, including wastewater collection 
        systems, and stormwater system improvements, Charleston, South 
        Carolina.'';
                    (B) by redesignating the paragraph (71) relating to 
                Placer and El Dorado Counties, California, as paragraph 
                (73);
                    (C) by redesignating the paragraph (72) relating to 
                Lassen, Plumas, Butte, Sierra, and Nevada Counties, 
                California, as paragraph (74);
                    (D) by striking the paragraph (71) relating to 
                Indianapolis, Indiana, and inserting the following:
            ``(75) Indianapolis, indiana.--$6,430,000 for environmental 
        infrastructure for Indianapolis, Indiana.'';
                    (E) by redesignating the paragraph (73) relating to 
                St. Croix Falls, Wisconsin, as paragraph (76);
                    (F) by redesignating paragraph (72), relating to 
                Alpine, California, as paragraph (77); and
                    (G) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(78) St. clair county, alabama.--$5,000,000 for water 
        related infrastructure, St. Clair County, Alabama.
            ``(79) Crawford county, arkansas.--$35,000,000 for water 
        supply infrastructure, Crawford County, Arkansas.
            ``(80) Alameda and contra costa counties, california.--
        $25,000,000 for recycled water treatment facilities within the 
        East Bay Municipal Utility District service area, Alameda and 
        Contra Costa Counties, California.
            ``(81) Aliso creek, orange county, california.--$5,000,000 
        for water related infrastructure, Aliso Creek, Orange County, 
        California.
            ``(82) Amador county, california.--$3,000,000 for wastewater 
        collection and treatment infrastructure, Amador County, 
        California.

[[Page 121 STAT. 1259]]

            ``(83) Arcadia, sierra madre, and upland, california.--
        $33,000,000 for water and wastewater infrastructure, Arcadia, 
        Sierra Madre, and Upland, California, including $13,000,000 for 
        stormwater infrastructure for Upland, California.
            ``(84) Big bear area regional wastewater agency, 
        california.--$15,000,000 for water reclamation and distribution 
        infrastructure, Big Bear Area Regional Wastewater Agency, 
        California.
            ``(85) Brawley colonia, imperial county, california.--
        $1,400,000 for water infrastructure to improve water quality in 
        the Brawley Colonia Water District, Imperial County, California.
            ``(86) Calaveras county, california.--$3,000,000 for water 
        supply and wastewater infrastructure improvement projects in 
        Calaveras County, California, including wastewater reclamation, 
        recycling, and conjunctive use projects.
            ``(87) Contra costa water district, california.--$23,000,000 
        for water and wastewater infrastructure for the Contra Costa 
        Water District, California.
            ``(88) East bay, san francisco, and santa clara areas, 
        california.--$4,000,000 for a desalination project to serve the 
        East Bay, San Francisco, and Santa Clara areas, California.
            ``(89) East palo alto, california.--$4,000,000 for a new 
        pump station and stormwater management and drainage system, East 
        Palo Alto, California.
            ``(90) Imperial county, california.--$10,000,000 for 
        wastewater infrastructure, including a wastewater disinfection 
        facility and polishing system, to improve water quality in the 
        vicinity of Calexico, California, on the southern New River, 
        Imperial County, California.
            ``(91) La habra, california.--$5,000,000 for wastewater and 
        water related infrastructure, city of La Habra, California.
            ``(92) La mirada, california.--$4,000,000 for the planning, 
        design, and construction of a stormwater program in La Mirada, 
        California.
            ``(93) Los angeles county, california.--$3,000,000 for 
        wastewater and water related infrastructure, Diamond Bar, La 
        Habra Heights, and Rowland Heights, Los Angeles County, 
        California.
            ``(94) Los angeles county, california.--$20,000,000 for the 
        planning, design, and construction of water related 
        infrastructure for Santa Monica Bay and the coastal zone of Los 
        Angeles County, California.
            ``(95) Malibu, california.--$3,000,000 for municipal 
        wastewater and recycled water infrastructure, Malibu Creek 
        Watershed Protection Project, Malibu, California.
            ``(96) Montebello, california.--$4,000,000 for water 
        infrastructure improvements in south Montebello, California.
            ``(97) New river, california.--$10,000,000 for wastewater 
        infrastructure to improve water quality in the New River, 
        California.
            ``(98) Orange county, california.--$10,000,000 for 
        wastewater and water related infrastructure, Anaheim, Brea, 
        Mission Viejo, Rancho Santa Margarita, and Yorba Linda, Orange 
        County, California.

[[Page 121 STAT. 1260]]

            ``(99) Port of stockton, stockton, california.--$3,000,000 
        for water and wastewater infrastructure projects for Rough and 
        Ready Island and vicinity, Stockton, California.
            ``(100) Perris, california.--$3,000,000 for recycled water 
        transmission infrastructure, Eastern Municipal Water District, 
        Perris, California.
            ``(101) San bernardino county, california.--$9,000,000 for 
        wastewater and water related infrastructure, Chino and Chino 
        Hills, San Bernardino County, California.
            ``(102) Santa clara county, california.--$5,500,000 for an 
        advanced recycling water treatment plant in Santa Clara County, 
        California.
            ``(103) Santa monica, california.--$3,000,000 for improving 
        water system reliability, Santa Monica, California.
            ``(104) Southern los angeles county, california.--
        $15,000,000 for environmental infrastructure for the groundwater 
        basin optimization pipeline, Southern Los Angeles County, 
        California.
            ``(105) Stockton, california.--$33,000,000 for water 
        treatment and distribution infrastructure, Stockton, California.
            ``(106) Sweetwater reservoir, san diego county, 
        california.--$375,000 to improve water quality and remove 
        nonnative aquatic nuisance species from the Sweetwater 
        Reservoir, San Diego County, California.
            ``(107) Whittier, california.--$8,000,000 for water, 
        wastewater, and water related infrastructure, Whittier, 
        California.
            ``(108) Arkansas valley conduit, colorado.--$10,000,000 for 
        the Arkansas Valley Conduit, Colorado.
            ``(109) Boulder county, colorado.--$10,000,000 for water 
        supply infrastructure, Boulder County, Colorado.
            ``(110) Montezuma and la plata counties, colorado.--
        $1,000,000 for water and wastewater related infrastructure for 
        the Ute Mountain project, Montezuma and La Plata Counties, 
        Colorado.
            ``(111) Otero, bent, crowley, kiowa, and prowers counties, 
        colorado.--$35,000,000 for water transmission infrastructure, 
        Otero, Bent, Crowley, Kiowa, and Prowers Counties, Colorado.
            ``(112) Pueblo and otero counties, colorado.--$34,000,000 
        for water transmission infrastructure, Pueblo and Otero 
        Counties, Colorado.
            ``(113) Enfield, connecticut.--$1,000,000 for infiltration 
        and inflow correction, Enfield, Connecticut.
            ``(114) Ledyard and montville, connecticut.--$7,113,000 for 
        water infrastructure, Ledyard and Montville, Connecticut.
            ``(115) New haven, connecticut.--$300,000 for stormwater 
        system improvements, New Haven, Connecticut.
            ``(116) Norwalk, connecticut.--$3,000,000 for the Keeler 
        Brook Storm Water Improvement Project, Norwalk, Connecticut.
            ``(117) Plainville, connecticut.--$6,280,000 for wastewater 
        treatment, Plainville, Connecticut.
            ``(118) Southington, connecticut.--$9,420,000 for water 
        supply infrastructure, Southington, Connecticut.
            ``(119) Anacostia river, district of columbia and 
        maryland.--$20,000,000 for environmental infrastructure and

[[Page 121 STAT. 1261]]

        resource protection and development to enhance water quality and 
        living resources in the Anacostia River watershed, District of 
        Columbia and Maryland.
            ``(120) District of columbia.--$35,000,000 for 
        implementation of a combined sewer overflow long-term control 
        plan in the District of Columbia.
            ``(121) Charlotte county, florida.--$3,000,000 for water 
        supply infrastructure, Charlotte County, Florida.
            ``(122) Charlotte, lee, and collier counties, florida.--
        $20,000,000 for water supply interconnectivity infrastructure, 
        Charlotte, Lee, and Collier Counties, Florida.
            ``(123) Collier county, florida.--$5,000,000 for water 
        infrastructure to improve water quality in the vicinity of the 
        Gordon River, Collier County, Florida.
            ``(124) Hillsborough county, florida.--$6,250,000 for water 
        infrastructure and supply enhancement, Hillsborough County, 
        Florida.
            ``(125) Jacksonville, florida.--$25,000,000 for wastewater 
        related infrastructure, including septic tank replacements, 
        Jacksonville, Florida.
            ``(126) Sarasota county, florida.--$10,000,000 for water and 
        wastewater infrastructure in Sarasota County, Florida.
            ``(127) South seminole and north orange county, florida.--
        $30,000,000 for wastewater infrastructure for the South Seminole 
        and North Orange Wastewater Transmission Authority, Florida.
            ``(128) Miami-dade county, florida.--$6,250,000 for water 
        reuse supply and a water transmission pipeline, Miami-Dade 
        County, Florida.
            ``(129) Palm beach county, florida.--$7,500,000 for water 
        infrastructure, Palm Beach County, Florida.
            ``(130) Albany, georgia.--$4,000,000 for a storm drainage 
        system, Albany, Georgia.
            ``(131) Banks county, georgia.--$5,000,000 for water 
        infrastructure improvements, Banks County, Georgia.
            ``(132) Berrien county, georgia.--$5,000,000 for water 
        infrastructure improvements, Berrien County, Georgia.
            ``(133) Chattooga county, georgia.--$8,000,000 for 
        wastewater and drinking water infrastructure improvement, 
        Chattooga County, Georgia.
            ``(134) Chattooga, floyd, gordon, walker, and whitifield 
        counties, georgia.--$10,000,000 for water infrastructure 
        improvements, Armuchee Valley, Chattooga, Floyd, Gordon, Walker, 
        and Whitifield Counties, Georgia.
            ``(135) Dahlonega, georgia.--$5,000,000 for water 
        infrastructure improvements, Dahlonega, Georgia.
            ``(136) East point, georgia.--$5,000,000 for water 
        infrastructure improvements, city of East Point, Georgia.
            ``(137) Fayetteville, grantville, lagrange, pine mountain 
        (harris county), douglasville, and carrollton, georgia.--
        $24,500,000 for water and wastewater infrastructure, 
        Fayetteville, Grantville, LaGrange, Pine Mountain (Harris 
        County), Douglasville, and Carrollton, Georgia.
            ``(138) Meriwether and spalding counties, georgia.--
        $7,000,000 for water and wastewater infrastructure, Meriwether 
        and Spalding Counties, Georgia.

[[Page 121 STAT. 1262]]

            ``(139) Moultrie, georgia.--$5,000,000 for water supply 
        infrastructure, Moultrie, Georgia.
            ``(140) Stephens county/city of toccoa, georgia.--$8,000,000 
        water infrastructure improvements, Stephens County/city of 
        Toccoa, Georgia.
            ``(141) North vernon and butlerville, indiana.--$1,700,000 
        for wastewater infrastructure, North Vernon and Butlerville, 
        Indiana.
            ``(142) Salem, washington county, indiana.--$3,200,000 for 
        water supply infrastructure, Salem, Washington County, Indiana.
            ``(143) Atchison, kansas.--$20,000,000 to address combined 
        sewer overflows, Atchison, Kansas.
            ``(144) Central kentucky.--$10,000,000 for water related 
        infrastructure and resource protection and development, Scott, 
        Franklin, Woodford, Anderson, Fayette, Mercer, Jessamine, Boyle, 
        Lincoln, Garrard, Madison, Estill, Powell, Clark, Montgomery, 
        and Bourbon Counties, Kentucky.
            ``(145) Lafayette, louisiana.--$1,200,000 for water and 
        wastewater improvements, Lafayette, Louisiana.
            ``(146) Lafourche parish, louisiana.--$2,300,000 for 
        measures to prevent the intrusion of saltwater into the 
        freshwater system, Lafourche Parish, Louisiana.
            ``(147) Lake charles, louisiana.--$1,000,000 for water and 
        wastewater improvements, Lake Charles, Louisiana.
            ``(148) Northwest louisiana council of governments, 
        louisiana.--$2,000,000 for water and wastewater improvements, 
        Northwest Louisiana Council of Governments, Louisiana.
            ``(149) Ouachita parish, louisiana.--$1,000,000 for water 
        and wastewater improvements, Ouachita Parish, Louisiana.
            ``(150) Plaquemine, louisiana.--$7,000,000 for sanitary 
        sewer and wastewater infrastructure, Plaquemine, Louisiana.
            ``(151) Rapides area planning commission, louisiana.--
        $1,000,000 for water and wastewater improvements, Rapides, 
        Louisiana.
            ``(152) Shreveport, louisiana.--$20,000,000 for water supply 
        infrastructure in Shreveport, Louisiana.
            ``(153) South central planning and development commission, 
        louisiana.--$2,500,000 for water and wastewater improvements, 
        South Central Planning and Development Commission, Louisiana.
            ``(154) Union-lincoln regional water supply project, 
        louisiana.--$2,000,000 for the Union-Lincoln Regional Water 
        Supply project, Louisiana.
            ``(155) Chesapeake bay improvements, maryland, virginia, and 
        district of columbia.--$30,000,000 for environmental 
        infrastructure projects to benefit the Chesapeake Bay, including 
        the nutrient removal project at the Blue Plains Wastewater 
        Treatment facility in the District of Columbia.
            ``(156) Chesapeake bay region, maryland and virginia.--
        $40,000,000 for water pollution control, Chesapeake Bay Region, 
        Maryland and Virginia.
            ``(157) Michigan combined sewer overflows.--$35,000,000 for 
        correction of combined sewer overflows, Michigan.

[[Page 121 STAT. 1263]]

            ``(158) Central iron range sanitary sewer district, 
        minnesota.--$12,000,000 for wastewater infrastructure for the 
        Central Iron Range Sanitary Sewer District to serve the cities 
        of Hibbing, Chisholm, Buhl, and Kinney, and Balkan and Great 
        Scott Townships, Minnesota.
            ``(159) Central lake region sanitary district, minnesota.--
        $2,000,000 for sanitary sewer and wastewater infrastructure for 
        the Central Lake Region Sanitary District, Minnesota, to serve 
        Le Grande and Moe Townships, Minnesota.
            ``(160) Goodview, minnesota.--$3,000,000 for water quality 
        infrastructure, Goodview, Minnesota.
            ``(161) Grand rapids, minnesota.--$5,000,000 for wastewater 
        infrastructure, Grand Rapids, Minnesota.
            ``(162) Willmar, minnesota.--$15,000,000 for wastewater 
        infrastructure, Willmar, Minnesota.
            ``(163) Biloxi, mississippi.--$5,000,000 for water and 
        wastewater related infrastructure, city of Biloxi, Mississippi.
            ``(164) Corinth, mississippi.--$7,500,000 for a surface 
        water program, city of Corinth, Mississippi.
            ``(165) Gulfport, mississippi.--$5,000,000 for water and 
        wastewater related infrastructure, city of Gulfport, 
        Mississippi.
            ``(166) Harrison county, mississippi.--$5,000,000 for water 
        and wastewater related infrastructure, Harrison County, 
        Mississippi.
            ``(167) Jackson, mississippi.--$25,000,000 for water and 
        wastewater infrastructure, Jackson, Mississippi.
            ``(168) Clark county, nevada.--$30,000,000 for wastewater 
        infrastructure, Clark County, Nevada.
            ``(169) Clean water coalition, nevada.--$50,000,000 for the 
        Systems Conveyance and Operations Program, Clark County, 
        Henderson, Las Vegas, and North Las Vegas, Nevada.
            ``(170) Glendale dam diversion structure, nevada.--
        $10,000,000 for water system improvements to the Glendale Dam 
        Diversion Structure for the Truckee Meadows Water Authority, 
        Nevada.
            ``(171) Henderson, nevada.--$13,000,000 for wastewater 
        infrastructure, Henderson, Nevada.
            ``(172) Indian springs, nevada.--$12,000,000 for 
        construction of wastewater system improvements for the Indian 
        Springs community, Nevada.
            ``(173) Reno, nevada.--$13,000,000 for construction of a 
        water conservation project for the Highland Canal, Mogul Bypass 
        in Reno, Nevada.
            ``(174) Washoe county, nevada.--$14,000,000 for construction 
        of water infrastructure improvements to the Huffaker Hills 
        Reservoir Conservation Project, Washoe County, Nevada.
            ``(175) Cranford township, new jersey.--$6,000,000 for storm 
        sewer improvements, Cranford Township, New Jersey.
            ``(176) Middletown township, new jersey.--$1,100,000 for 
        storm sewer improvements, Middletown Township, New Jersey.
            ``(177) Paterson, new jersey.--$35,000,000 for wastewater 
        infrastructure, Paterson, New Jersey.
            ``(178) Rahway valley, new jersey.--$25,000,000 for sanitary 
        sewer and storm sewer improvements in the service area of the 
        Rahway Valley Sewerage Authority, New Jersey.

[[Page 121 STAT. 1264]]

            ``(179) Babylon, new york.--$5,000,000 for wastewater 
        infrastructure, Town of Babylon, New York.
            ``(180) Ellicottville, new york.--$2,000,000 for water 
        supply, water, and wastewater infrastructure in Ellicottville, 
        New York.
            ``(181) Elmira, new york.--$5,000,000 for wastewater 
        infrastructure, Elmira, New York.
            ``(182) Essex hamlet, new york.--$5,000,000 for wastewater 
        infrastructure, Essex Hamlet, New York.
            ``(183) Fleming, new york.--$5,000,000 for drinking water 
        infrastructure, Fleming, New York.
            ``(184) Kiryas joel, new york.--$5,000,000 for drinking 
        water infrastructure, village of Kiryas Joel, New York.
            ``(185) Niagara falls, new york.--$5,000,000 for wastewater 
        infrastructure, Niagara Falls Water Board, New York.
            ``(186) Patchogue, new york.--$5,000,000 for wastewater 
        infrastructure, village of Patchogue, New York.
            ``(187) Sennett, new york.--$1,500,000 for water 
        infrastructure, town of Sennett, New York.
            ``(188) Springport and fleming, new york.--$10,000,000 for 
        water related infrastructure, including water mains, pump 
        stations, and water storage tanks, Springport and Fleming, New 
        York.
            ``(189) Wellsville, new york.--$2,000,000 for water supply, 
        water, and wastewater infrastructure in Wellsville, New York.
            ``(190) Yates county, new york.--$5,000,000 for drinking 
        water infrastructure, Yates County, New York.
            ``(191) Cabarrus county, north carolina.--$4,500,000 for 
        water related infrastructure, Cabarrus County, North Carolina.
            ``(192) Cary, wake county, north carolina.--$4,000,000 for a 
        water reclamation facility, Cary, Wake County, North Carolina.
            ``(193) Charlotte, north carolina.--$14,000,000 for the 
        Briar Creek Relief Sewer project, city of Charlotte, North 
        Carolina.
            ``(194) Fayetteville, cumberland county, north carolina.--
        $6,000,000 for water and sewer upgrades, city of Fayetteville, 
        Cumberland County, North Carolina.
            ``(195) Mooresville, north carolina.--$4,000,000 for water 
        and wastewater infrastructure improvements, town of Mooresville, 
        North Carolina.
            ``(196) Neuse regional water and sewer authority, north 
        carolina.--$4,000,000 for the Neuse regional drinking water 
        facility, Kinston, North Carolina.
            ``(197) Richmond county, north carolina.--$13,500,000 for 
        water related infrastructure, Richmond County, North Carolina.
            ``(198) Union county, north carolina.--$6,000,000 for water 
        related infrastructure, Union County, North Carolina.
            ``(199) Washington county, north carolina.--$1,000,000 for 
        water and wastewater infrastructure, Washington County, North 
        Carolina.
            ``(200) Winston-salem, north carolina.--$3,000,000 for 
        stormwater upgrades, city of Winston-Salem, North Carolina.

[[Page 121 STAT. 1265]]

            ``(201) North dakota.--$15,000,000 for water-related 
        infrastructure, North Dakota.
            ``(202) Devils lake, north dakota.--$15,000,000 for water 
        supply infrastructure, Devils Lake, North Dakota.
            ``(203) Saipan, northern mariana islands.--$20,000,000 for 
        water related infrastructure, Saipan, Northern Mariana Islands.
            ``(204) Akron, ohio.--$5,000,000 for wastewater 
        infrastructure, Akron, Ohio.
            ``(205) Burr oak regional water district, ohio.--$4,000,000 
        for construction of a water line to extend from a well field 
        near Chauncey, Ohio, to a water treatment plant near Millfield, 
        Ohio.
            ``(206) Cincinnati, ohio.--$1,000,000 for wastewater 
        infrastructure, Cincinnati, Ohio.
            ``(207) Cleveland, ohio.--$2,500,000 for Flats East Bank 
        water and wastewater infrastructure, city of Cleveland, Ohio.
            ``(208) Columbus, ohio.--$4,500,000 for wastewater 
        infrastructure, Columbus, Ohio.
            ``(209) Dayton, ohio.--$1,000,000 for water and wastewater 
        infrastructure, Dayton, Ohio.
            ``(210) Defiance county, ohio.--$1,000,000 for wastewater 
        infrastructure, Defiance County, Ohio.
            ``(211) Fostoria, ohio.--$2,000,000 for wastewater 
        infrastructure, Fostoria, Ohio.
            ``(212) Fremont, ohio.--$2,000,000 for construction of off-
        stream water supply reservoir, Fremont, Ohio.
            ``(213) Lake county, ohio.--$1,500,000 for wastewater 
        infrastructure, Lake County, Ohio.
            ``(214) Lawrence county, ohio.--$5,000,000 for Union Rome 
        wastewater infrastructure, Lawrence County, Ohio.
            ``(215) Meigs county, ohio.--$1,000,000 to extend the Tupper 
        Plains Regional Water District water line to Meigs County, Ohio.
            ``(216) Mentor-on-lake, ohio.--$625,000 for water and 
        wastewater infrastructure, Mentor-on-Lake, Ohio.
            ``(217) Vinton county, ohio.--$1,000,000 to construct water 
        lines in Vinton and Brown Townships, Ohio.
            ``(218) Willowick, ohio.--$665,000 for water and wastewater 
        infrastructure, Willowick, Ohio.
            ``(219) Ada, oklahoma.--$1,700,000 for sewer improvements 
        and other water infrastructure, city of Ada, Oklahoma.
            ``(220) Alva, oklahoma.--$250,000 for wastewater 
        infrastructure improvements, city of Alva, Oklahoma.
            ``(221) Ardmore, oklahoma.--$1,900,000 for water and sewer 
        infrastructure improvements, city of Ardmore, Oklahoma.
            ``(222) Bartlesville, oklahoma.--$2,500,000 for water supply 
        infrastructure, city of Bartlesville, Oklahoma.
            ``(223) Bethany, oklahoma.--$1,500,000 for water 
        improvements and water related infrastructure, city of Bethany, 
        Oklahoma.
            ``(224) Chickasha, oklahoma.--$650,000 for industrial park 
        sewer infrastructure, city of Chickasha, Oklahoma.
            ``(225) Disney and langley, oklahoma.--$2,500,000 for water 
        and sewer improvements and water related infrastructure, cities 
        of Disney and Langley, Oklahoma.

[[Page 121 STAT. 1266]]

            ``(226) Durant, oklahoma.--$3,300,000 for bayou restoration 
        and water related infrastructure, city of Durant, Oklahoma.
            ``(227) Eastern oklahoma state university, wilberton, 
        oklahoma.--$1,000,000 for sewer and utility upgrades and water 
        related infrastructure, Eastern Oklahoma State University, 
        Wilberton, Oklahoma.
            ``(228) Guymon, oklahoma.--$16,000,000 for water and 
        wastewater related infrastructure, city of Guymon, Oklahoma.
            ``(229) Konawa, oklahoma.--$500,000 for water treatment 
        infrastructure improvements, city of Konawa, Oklahoma.
            ``(230) Lugert-altus irrigation district, altus, oklahoma.--
        $5,000,000 for water related infrastructure improvements, 
        Lugert-Altus Irrigation District, Altus, Oklahoma.
            ``(231) Midwest city, oklahoma.--$2,000,000 for improvements 
        to water related infrastructure, the City of Midwest City, 
        Oklahoma.
            ``(232) Mustang, oklahoma.--$3,325,000 for water 
        improvements and water related infrastructure, city of Mustang, 
        Oklahoma.
            ``(233) Norman, oklahoma.--$10,000,000 for water related 
        infrastructure, Norman, Oklahoma.
            ``(234) Oklahoma panhandle state university, guymon, 
        oklahoma.--$275,000 for water testing facility and water related 
        infrastructure development, Oklahoma Panhandle State University, 
        Guymon, Oklahoma.
            ``(235) Weatherford, oklahoma.--$500,000 for arsenic program 
        and water related infrastructure, city of Weatherford, Oklahoma.
            ``(236) Woodward, oklahoma.--$1,500,000 for water 
        improvements and water related infrastructure, Woodward, 
        Oklahoma.
            ``(237) Albany, oregon.--$35,000,000 for wastewater 
        infrastructure to improve habitat restoration, Albany, Oregon.
            ``(238) Beaver creek reservoir, pennsylvania.--$3,000,000 
        for projects for water supply and related activities, Beaver 
        Creek Reservoir, Clarion County, Beaver and Salem Townships, 
        Pennsylvania.
            ``(239) Hatfield borough, pennsylvania.--$310,000 for 
        wastewater related infrastructure for Hatfield Borough, 
        Pennsylvania.
            ``(240) Lehigh county, pennsylvania.--$5,000,000 for 
        stormwater control measures and storm sewer improvements, Lehigh 
        County, Pennsylvania.
            ``(241) North wales borough, pennsylvania.--$1,516,584 for 
        wastewater related infrastructure for North Wales Borough, 
        Pennsylvania.
            ``(242) Pen argyl, pennsylvania.--$5,250,000 for wastewater 
        infrastructure, Pen Argyl, Pennsylvania.
            ``(243) Philadelphia, pennsylvania.--$1,600,000 for 
        wastewater related infrastructure for Philadelphia, 
        Pennsylvania.
            ``(244) Stockerton borough, tatamy borough, and palmer 
        township, pennsylvania.--$10,000,000 for stormwater control 
        measures, particularly to address sinkholes, in the vicinity of 
        Stockerton Borough, Tatamy Borough, and Palmer Township, 
        Pennsylvania.

[[Page 121 STAT. 1267]]

            ``(245) Vera cruz, pennsylvania.--$5,500,000 for wastewater 
        infrastructure, Vera Cruz, Pennsylvania.
            ``(246) Commonwealth of puerto rico.--$35,000,000 for water 
        and wastewater infrastructure in the Commonwealth of Puerto 
        Rico.
            ``(247) Charleston, south carolina.--$4,000,000 for 
        stormwater control measures and storm sewer improvements, Spring 
        Street/Fishburne Street drainage project, Charleston, South 
        Carolina.
            ``(248) Charleston and west ashley, south carolina.--
        $6,000,000 for wastewater tunnel replacement, Charleston and 
        West Ashley, South Carolina.
            ``(249) Crooked creek, marlboro county, south carolina.--
        $25,000,000 for a project for water storage and water supply 
        infrastructure on Crooked Creek, Marlboro County, South 
        Carolina.
            ``(250) Myrtle beach, south carolina.--$18,000,000 for 
        environmental infrastructure, including ocean outfalls, Myrtle 
        Beach, South Carolina.
            ``(251) North myrtle beach, south carolina.--$11,000,000 for 
        environmental infrastructure, including ocean outfalls, North 
        Myrtle Beach, South Carolina.
            ``(252) Surfside, south carolina.--$11,000,000 for 
        environmental infrastructure, including stormwater system 
        improvements and ocean outfalls, Surfside, South Carolina.
            ``(253) Cheyenne river sioux reservation (dewey and ziebach 
        counties) and perkins and meade counties, south dakota.--
        $65,000,000 for water related infrastructure, Cheyenne River 
        Sioux Reservation (Dewey and Ziebach counties) and Perkins and 
        Meade Counties, South Dakota.
            ``(254) Athens, tennessee.--$16,000,000 for wastewater 
        infrastructure, Athens, Tennessee.
            ``(255) Blaine, tennessee.--$500,000 for water supply and 
        wastewater infrastructure, Blaine, Tennessee.
            ``(256) Claiborne county, tennessee.--$1,250,000 for water 
        supply and wastewater infrastructure, Claiborne County, 
        Tennessee.
            ``(257) Giles county, tennessee.--$2,000,000 for water 
        supply and wastewater infrastructure, county of Giles, 
        Tennessee.
            ``(258) Grainger county, tennessee.--$1,250,000 for water 
        supply and wastewater infrastructure, Grainger County, 
        Tennessee.
            ``(259) Hamilton county, tennessee.--$500,000 for water 
        supply and wastewater infrastructure, Hamilton County, 
        Tennessee.
            ``(260) Harrogate, tennessee.--$2,000,000 for water supply 
        and wastewater infrastructure, city of Harrogate, Tennessee.
            ``(261) Johnson county, tennessee.--$600,000 for water 
        supply and wastewater infrastructure, Johnson County, Tennessee.
            ``(262) Knoxville, tennessee.--$5,000,000 for water supply 
        and wastewater infrastructure, city of Knoxville, Tennessee.
            ``(263) Nashville, tennessee.--$5,000,000 for water supply 
        and wastewater infrastructure, Nashville, Tennessee.

[[Page 121 STAT. 1268]]

            ``(264) Lewis, lawrence, and wayne counties, tennessee.--
        $2,000,000 for water supply and wastewater infrastructure, 
        counties of Lewis, Lawrence, and Wayne, Tennessee.
            ``(265) Oak ridge, tennessee.--$4,000,000 for water supply 
        and wastewater infrastructure, city of Oak Ridge, Tennessee.
            ``(266) Plateau utility district, morgan county, 
        tennessee.--$1,000,000 for water supply and wastewater 
        infrastructure, Morgan County, Tennessee.
            ``(267) Shelby county, tennessee.--$4,000,000 for water 
        related environmental infrastructure, county of Shelby, 
        Tennessee.
            ``(268) Central texas.--$20,000,000 for water and wastewater 
        infrastructure in Bosque, Brazos, Burleson, Grimes, Hill, Hood, 
        Johnson, Madison, McLennan, Limestone, Robertson, and Somervell 
        Counties, Texas.
            ``(269) El paso county, texas.--$25,000,000 for water 
        related infrastructure and resource protection, including 
        stormwater management, and development, El Paso County, Texas.
            ``(270) Ft. bend county, texas.--$20,000,000 for water and 
        wastewater infrastructure, Ft. Bend County, Texas.
            ``(271) Duchesne, iron, and uintah counties, utah.--
        $10,800,000 for water related infrastructure, Duchesne, Iron, 
        and Uintah Counties, Utah.
            ``(272) Northern west virginia.--$20,000,000 for water and 
        wastewater infrastructure in Hancock, Ohio, Marshall, Wetzel, 
        Tyler, Pleasants, Wood, Doddridge, Monongalia, Marion, Harrison, 
        Taylor, Barbour, Preston, Tucker, Mineral, Grant, Gilmer, 
        Brooke, and Ritchie Counties, West Virginia.
            ``(273) United states virgin islands.--$25,000,000 for 
        wastewater infrastructure for the St. Croix Anguilla wastewater 
        treatment plant and the St. Thomas Charlotte Amalie wastewater 
        treatment plant, United States Virgin Islands.''.

                      TITLE VI--FLORIDA EVERGLADES

SEC. 6001. HILLSBORO AND OKEECHOBEE AQUIFER, FLORIDA.

    (a) Modification.--The project for Hillsboro and Okeechobee Aquifer, 
Florida, authorized by section 101(a)(16) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 276), is modified to authorize the 
Secretary to carry out the project at a total cost of $42,500,000.
    (b) Treatment.--Section 601(b)(2)(A) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2681) is amended--
            (1) in clause (i) by adding at the end the following: ``The 
        project for aquifer storage and recovery, Hillsboro and 
        Okeechobee Aquifer, Florida, authorized by section 101(a)(16) of 
        the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 276), 
        shall be treated for purposes of this section as being in the 
        Plan, except that operation and maintenance costs of the project 
        shall remain a non-Federal responsibility.''; and
            (2) in clause (iii) by inserting after ``subparagraph (B)'' 
        the following: ``and the project for aquifer storage and 
        recovery, Hillsboro and Okeechobee Aquifer''.

[[Page 121 STAT. 1269]]

SEC. 6002. PILOT PROJECTS.

    Section 601(b)(2)(B) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 
(114 Stat. 2681) is amended--
            (1) in the matter preceding clause (i)--
                    (A) by striking ``$69,000,000'' and inserting 
                ``$71,200,000''; and
                    (B) by striking ``$34,500,000'' each place it 
                appears and inserting ``$35,600,000''; and
            (2) in clause (i)--
                    (A) by striking ``$6,000,000'' and inserting 
                ``$8,200,000''; and
                    (B) by striking ``$3,000,000'' each place it appears 
                and inserting ``$4,100,000''.
SEC. 6003. MAXIMUM COSTS.

    (a) Maximum Cost of Projects.--Section 601(b)(2)(E) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2683) is amended by 
inserting ``and section (d)'' before the period at the end.
    (b) Maximum Cost of Program Authority.--Section 601(c)(3) of such 
Act (114 Stat. 2684) is amended by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(C) <<NOTE: Applicability.>> Maximum cost of 
                program authority.--Section 902 of the Water Resources 
                Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2280) shall apply to 
                the individual project funding limits in subparagraph 
                (A) and the aggregate cost limits in subparagraph 
                (B).''.
SEC. 6004. CREDIT.

    Section 601(e)(5)(B) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 
(114 Stat. 2685) is amended--
            (1) in clause (i)--
                    (A) by striking ``or'' at the end of subclause (I);
                    (B) by adding ``or'' at the end of subclause (II); 
                and
                    (C) by adding at the end the following:
                          ``(III) the credit is provided for work 
                      carried out before the date of the partnership 
                      agreement between the Secretary and the non-
                      Federal sponsor, as defined in an agreement 
                      between the Secretary and the non-Federal sponsor 
                      providing for such credit;''; and
            (2) in clause (ii)--
                    (A) by striking ``design agreement or the project 
                cooperation''; and
                    (B) by inserting before the semicolon the following: 
                ``, including in the case of credit provided under 
                clause (i)(III) conditions relating to design and 
                construction''.
SEC. 6005. OUTREACH AND ASSISTANCE.

    Section 601(k) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 
Stat. 2691) is amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``(3) Maximum expenditures.--The Secretary may expend up to 
        $3,000,000 per fiscal year for fiscal years beginning after 
        September 30, 2004, to carry out this subsection.''.
SEC. 6006. CRITICAL RESTORATION PROJECTS.

    Section 528(b)(3)(C) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 
(110 Stat. 3769) is amended--

[[Page 121 STAT. 1270]]

            (1) in clause (i) by striking ``$75,000,000'' and all that 
        follows and inserting ``$95,000,000''; and
            (2) by striking clause (ii) and inserting the following:
                          ``(ii) Federal share.--
                                    ``(I) In general.--Except as 
                                provided in subclause (II), the Federal 
                                share of the cost of carrying out a 
                                project under subparagraph (A) shall not 
                                exceed $25,000,000.
                                    ``(II) Seminole water conservation 
                                plan.--The Federal share of the cost of 
                                carrying out the Seminole water 
                                conservation plan shall not exceed 
                                $30,000,000.''.
SEC. 6007. REGIONAL ENGINEERING MODEL FOR ENVIRONMENTAL 
                          RESTORATION.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall complete the development and 
testing of the regional engineering model for environmental restoration 
as expeditiously as practicable.
    (b) Usage.--The Secretary shall consider using, as appropriate, the 
regional engineering model for environmental restoration in the 
development of future water resource projects, including projects 
developed pursuant to section 601 of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 2000 (114 Stat. 2680).

                    TITLE VII--LOUISIANA COASTAL AREA

SEC. 7001. DEFINITIONS.

    In this title, the following definitions apply:
            (1) Coastal louisiana ecosystem.--The term ``coastal 
        Louisiana ecosystem'' means the coastal area of Louisiana from 
        the Sabine River on the west to the Pearl River on the east, 
        including those parts of the Atchafalaya River Basin and the 
        Mississippi River Deltaic Plain below the Old River Control 
        Structure and the Chenier Plain included within the study area 
        of the restoration plan.
            (2) Governor.--The term ``Governor'' means the Governor of 
        the State of Louisiana.
            (3) Restoration plan.--The term ``restoration plan'' means 
        the report of the Chief of Engineers for ecosystem restoration 
        for the Louisiana Coastal Area dated January 31, 2005.
            (4) Task force.--The term ``Task Force'' means the Coastal 
        Louisiana Ecosystem Protection and Restoration Task Force 
        established by section 7003.
            (5) Comprehensive plan.--The term ``comprehensive plan'' 
        means the plan developed under section 7002 and any revisions 
        thereto.
SEC. 7002. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary, in coordination with the Governor, 
shall develop a comprehensive plan for protecting, preserving, and 
restoring the coastal Louisiana ecosystem.
    (b) Integration of Plan Into Comprehensive Hurricane Protection 
Study.--In developing the comprehensive plan, the Secretary shall 
integrate the restoration plan into the analysis and design of the 
comprehensive hurricane protection study authorized by title I of the 
Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act, 2006 (119 Stat. 2247).

[[Page 121 STAT. 1271]]

    (c) Consistency With Comprehensive Coastal Protection Master Plan.--
In developing the comprehensive plan, the Secretary shall ensure that 
the plan is not inconsistent with the goals, analysis, and design of the 
comprehensive coastal protection master plan authorized and defined 
pursuant to Act 8 of the First Extraordinary Session of the Louisiana 
State Legislature, 2005.
    (d) Inclusions.--The comprehensive plan shall include a description 
of--
            (1) the framework of a long-term program integrated with 
        hurricane and storm damage reduction, flood damage reduction, 
        and navigation activities that provide for the comprehensive 
        protection, conservation, and restoration of the wetlands, 
        estuaries, barrier islands, shorelines, and related land and 
        features of the coastal Louisiana ecosystem, including 
        protection of critical resources, habitat, and infrastructure 
        from the effects of a coastal storm, a hurricane, erosion, or 
        subsidence;
            (2) the means by which a new technology, or an improved 
        technique, can be integrated into the program referred to in 
        paragraph (1);
            (3) the role of other Federal and State agencies and 
        programs in carrying out such program;
            (4) specific, measurable success criteria (including 
        ecological criteria) by which success of the plan will be 
        measured;
            (5) proposed projects in order of priority as determined by 
        their respective potential to contribute to--
                    (A) creation of coastal wetlands; and
                    (B) flood protection of communities ranked by 
                population density and level of protection; and
            (6) efforts by Federal, State, and local interests to 
        address sociological, economic, and related fields of law.

    (e) Considerations.--In developing the comprehensive plan, the 
Secretary shall consider the advisability of integrating into the 
program referred to in subsection (d)(1)--
            (1) an investigation and study of the maximum effective use 
        of the water and sediment of the Mississippi and Atchafalaya 
        Rivers for coastal restoration purposes consistent with flood 
        control and navigation;
            (2) a schedule for the design and implementation of large-
        scale water and sediment reintroduction projects and an 
        assessment of funding needs from any source;
            (3) an investigation and assessment of alterations in the 
        operation of the Old River Control Structure, consistent with 
        flood control and navigation purposes;
            (4) any related Federal or State project being carried out 
        on the date on which the plan is developed;
            (5) any activity in the restoration plan; and
            (6) any other project or activity identified in one or more 
        of--
                    (A) the Mississippi River and Tributaries program;
                    (B) the Louisiana Coastal Wetlands Conservation 
                Plan;
                    (C) the Louisiana Coastal Zone Management Plan;
                    (D) the plan of the State of Louisiana entitled 
                ``Integrated Ecosystem Restoration and Hurricane 
                Protection--Louisiana's Comprehensive Master Plan for a 
                Sustainable Coast''; and

[[Page 121 STAT. 1272]]

                    (E) other relevant reports as determined by the 
                Secretary.

    (f) Reports to Congress.--
            (1) Initial report.--Not later than 1 year after the date of 
        enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to Congress a 
        report containing the comprehensive plan.
            (2) Updates.--Not later than 5 years after the date of 
        submission of a report under paragraph (1), and at least once 
        every 5 years thereafter until implementation of the 
        comprehensive plan is complete, the Secretary shall submit to 
        Congress a report containing an update of the plan and an 
        assessment of the progress made in implementing the plan.
SEC. 7003. LOUISIANA COASTAL AREA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary may carry out a program for ecosystem 
restoration, Louisiana Coastal Area, Louisiana, substantially in 
accordance with the report of the Chief of Engineers, dated January 31, 
2005.
    (b) Priorities.--
            (1) In general.--In carrying out the program under 
        subsection (a), the Secretary shall give priority to--
                    (A) any portion of the program identified in the 
                report described in subsection (a) as a critical 
                restoration feature;
                    (B) any Mississippi River diversion project that--
                          (i) will protect a major population area of 
                      the Pontchartrain, Pearl, Breton Sound, Barataria, 
                      or Terrebonne basins; and
                          (ii) will produce an environmental benefit to 
                      the coastal Louisiana ecosystem;
                    (C) any barrier island, or barrier shoreline, 
                project that--
                          (i) will be carried out in conjunction with a 
                      Mississippi River diversion project; and
                          (ii) will protect a major population area;
                    (D) any project that will reduce storm surge and 
                prevent or reduce the risk of loss of human life and the 
                risk to public safety; and
                    (E) a project to physically modify the Mississippi 
                River-Gulf Outlet and to restore the areas affected by 
                the Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet in accordance with the 
                comprehensive plan to be developed under section 7002(a) 
                and consistent with sections 7006(c)(1)(A) and 7013.
SEC. 7004. COASTAL LOUISIANA ECOSYSTEM PROTECTION AND RESTORATION 
                          TASK FORCE.

    (a) Establishment.--There is established a task force to be known as 
the Coastal Louisiana Ecosystem Protection and Restoration Task Force 
(in this section referred to as the ``Task Force'').
    (b) Membership.--The Task Force shall consist of the following 
members (or, in the case of the head of a Federal agency, a designee of 
the head of the agency at the level of Assistant Secretary or an 
equivalent level):
            (1) The Secretary.
            (2) The Secretary of the Interior.
            (3) The Secretary of Commerce.
            (4) The Administrator of the Environmental Protection 
        Agency.
            (5) The Secretary of Agriculture.

[[Page 121 STAT. 1273]]

            (6) The Secretary of Transportation.
            (7) The Secretary of Energy.
            (8) The Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management 
        Agency.
            (9) The Commandant of the Coast Guard.
            (10) The Chair of the Coastal Protection and Restoration 
        Authority of Louisiana.
            (11) Two representatives of the State of Louisiana selected 
        by the Governor.

    (c) Duties.--The Task Force shall make recommendations to the 
Secretary regarding--
            (1) policies, strategies, plans, programs, projects, and 
        activities for addressing conservation, protection, restoration, 
        and maintenance of the coastal Louisiana ecosystem;
            (2) financial participation by each agency represented on 
        the Task Force in conserving, protecting, restoring, and 
        maintaining the coastal Louisiana ecosystem, including 
        recommendations--
                    (A) that identify funds from current agency missions 
                and budgets; and
                    (B) for coordinating individual agency budget 
                requests; and
            (3) the comprehensive plan to be developed under section 
        7002(a).

    (d) Report.--The Task Force shall submit to Congress a biennial 
report that summarizes the activities and recommendations of the Task 
Force.
    (e) Working Groups.--
            (1) General authority.--The Task Force may establish such 
        working groups as the Task Force determines to be necessary to 
        assist the Task Force in carrying out this section.
            (2) Hurricanes katrina and rita.--
                    (A) <<NOTE: Establishment.>> Integration team.--The 
                Task Force shall establish a working group for the 
                purpose of advising the Task Force of opportunities to 
                integrate the planning, engineering, design, 
                implementation, and performance of Corps of Engineers 
                projects for hurricane and storm damage reduction, flood 
                damage reduction, ecosystem restoration, and navigation 
                in those areas in Louisiana for which a major disaster 
                has been declared by the President as a result of 
                Hurricane Katrina or Rita.
                    (B) Expertise; representation.--In establishing the 
                working group under subparagraph (A), the Task Force 
                shall ensure that the group--
                          (i) has expertise in coastal estuaries, 
                      diversions, coastal restoration and wetlands 
                      protection, ecosystem restoration, hurricane 
                      protection, storm damage reduction systems, 
                      navigation, and ports; and
                          (ii) represents the State of Louisiana and 
                      local governments in southern Louisiana.
                    (C) Duties.--In developing its recommendations under 
                this subsection, the working group shall--
                          (i) review reports relating to the performance 
                      of, and recommendations relating to the future 
                      performance of, the hurricane, coastal, and flood 
                      protection systems in southern Louisiana, 
                      including the reports issued by the Interagency 
                      Performance Evaluation

[[Page 121 STAT. 1274]]

                      Team, the National Academy of Sciences, the 
                      National Science Foundation, the American Society 
                      of Civil Engineers, and Team Louisiana for the 
                      purpose of advising the Task Force and the 
                      Secretary on opportunities to improve the 
                      performance of the protection systems;
                          (ii) assist in providing reviews under section 
                      2035; and
                          (iii) carry out such other duties as the Task 
                      Force or the Secretary determines to be 
                      appropriate.

    (f) Compensation.--Members of the Task Force and members of a 
working group established by the Task Force may not receive compensation 
for their services as members of the Task Force or working group, as the 
case may be.
    (g) Travel Expenses.--Travel expenses incurred by members of the 
Task Force and members of a working group established by the Task Force, 
in the performance of their service on the Task Force or working group, 
as the case may be, shall be paid by the agency or entity that the 
member represents.
    (h) Nonapplicability of FACA.--The Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 
U.S.C. App.) shall not apply to the Task Force or any working group 
established by the Task Force.
SEC. 7005. PROJECT MODIFICATIONS.

    (a) Review.--The Secretary, in cooperation with the non-Federal 
interest of the project involved, shall review each Federally-authorized 
water resources project in the coastal Louisiana ecosystem being carried 
out or completed as of the date of enactment of this Act to determine 
whether the project needs to be modified--
            (1) to take into account the program authorized by section 
        7003 and the projects authorized by sections 7006(e) and 7013; 
        or
            (2) to contribute to ecosystem restoration under section 
        7003, 7006(e), or 7013.

    (b) Modifications.--Subject to subsections (c) and (d), the 
Secretary may carry out the modifications described in subsection (a).
    (c) Public Notice and Comment.--Before completing the report 
required under subsection (d), the Secretary shall provide an 
opportunity for public notice and comment.
    (d) Report.--
            (1) In general.--Before modifying an operation or feature of 
        a project under subsection (b), the Secretary shall submit to 
        the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House 
        of Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public 
        Works of the Senate a report describing the modification.
            (2) Inclusion.--A report describing a modification under 
        paragraph (1) shall include such information relating to the 
        timeline for and cost of the modification, as the Secretary 
        determines to be relevant.

    (e) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $10,000,000.
SEC. 7006. CONSTRUCTION.

    (a) Science and Technology.--

[[Page 121 STAT. 1275]]

            (1) In general.--The Secretary shall carry out a coastal 
        Louisiana ecosystem science and technology program substantially 
        in accordance with the restoration plan at a total cost of 
        $100,000,000.
            (2) Purposes.--The purposes of the program shall be--
                    (A) to identify any uncertainty relating to the 
                physical, chemical, geological, biological, and cultural 
                baseline conditions in the coastal Louisiana ecosystem;
                    (B) to improve knowledge of the physical, chemical, 
                geological, biological, and cultural baseline conditions 
                in the coastal Louisiana ecosystem;
                    (C) to identify and develop technologies, models, 
                and methods to carry out this subsection; and
                    (D) to advance and expedite the implementation of 
                the comprehensive plan.
            (3) Working groups.--The Secretary may establish such 
        working groups as the Secretary determines to be necessary to 
        assist the Secretary in carrying out this subsection.
            (4) Contracts and cooperative agreements.--In carrying out 
        this subsection, the Secretary may enter into a contract or 
        cooperative agreement with a consortium of academic institutions 
        in Louisiana with scientific or engineering expertise in the 
        restoration of aquatic and marine ecosystems for coastal 
        restoration and enhancement through science and technology.
            (5) Applicability of the federal advisory committee act.--
        The Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App.) shall not 
        apply to a working group established under this subsection.

    (b) Demonstration Projects.--
            (1) In general.--Subject to paragraph (2), the Secretary may 
        carry out demonstration projects substantially in accordance 
        with the restoration plan and within the coastal Louisiana 
        ecosystem for the purpose of resolving critical areas of 
        scientific or technological uncertainty related to the 
        implementation of the comprehensive plan.
            (2) Maximum cost.--
                    (A) Total cost.--The total cost for planning, 
                design, and construction of all projects under this 
                subsection shall not exceed $100,000,000.
                    (B) Individual project.--The total cost of any 
                single project under this subsection shall not exceed 
                $25,000,000.

    (c) Initial Projects.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary is authorized to carry out 
        the following projects substantially in accordance with the 
        restoration plan:
                    (A) Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet environmental 
                restoration at a total cost of $105,300,000, but not 
                including those elements of the project that produce 
                navigation benefits.
                    (B) Small diversion at Hope Canal at a total cost of 
                $68,600,000.
                    (C) Barataria basin barrier shoreline restoration at 
                a total cost of $242,600,000.
                    (D) Small Bayou Lafourche reintroduction at a total 
                cost of $133,500,000.
                    (E) Medium diversion at Myrtle Grove with dedicated 
                dredging at a total cost of $278,300,000.

[[Page 121 STAT. 1276]]

            (2) Modifications.--
                    (A) In general.--In carrying out each project under 
                paragraph (1), the Secretary shall carry out such 
                modifications as may be necessary to the ecosystem 
                restoration features identified in the restoration 
                plan--
                          (i) to address the impacts of Hurricanes 
                      Katrina and Rita on the areas of the project; and
                          (ii) to ensure consistency with the project 
                      authorized by section 7013 (including work in and 
                      around the vicinity of the Mississippi River-Gulf 
                      Outlet).
                    (B) Integration.--The Secretary shall ensure that 
                each modification under subparagraph (A) is taken into 
                account in conducting the study of comprehensive 
                hurricane protection authorized by title I of the Energy 
                and Water Development Appropriations Act, 2006 (119 
                Stat. 2247).
                    (C) Mississippi river-gulf outlet.--In carrying out 
                the project under paragraph (1)(A), the Secretary shall 
                carry out such modifications as may be necessary to make 
                the project consistent with and complementary to the 
                closure and restoration of the Mississippi River-Gulf 
                Outlet authorized by section 7013.
            (3) Construction reports.--Before the Secretary may begin 
        construction of any project under this subsection, the Secretary 
        shall submit a report documenting any modifications to the 
        project, including cost changes, to the Committee on 
        Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of 
        Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public 
        Works of the Senate.
            (4) Applicability of other provisions.--Notwithstanding 
        section 902 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 
        U.S.C. 2280), the cost of a project under this subsection, 
        including any modifications to the project, shall not exceed 150 
        percent of the cost of such project set forth in paragraph (1).

    (d) Beneficial Use of Dredged Material.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary, substantially in accordance 
        with the restoration plan, shall implement in the coastal 
        Louisiana ecosystem a program for the beneficial use of material 
        dredged from federally maintained waterways at a total cost of 
        $100,000,000.
            (2) Consideration.--In carrying out the program under 
        paragraph (1), the Secretary shall consider the beneficial use 
        of sediment from the Illinois River System for wetlands 
        restoration in wetlands-depleted watersheds of the coastal 
        Louisiana ecosystem.

    (e) Additional Projects.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary is authorized to carry out 
        the following projects referred to in the restoration plan if 
        the Secretary determines such projects are feasible:
                    (A) Land Bridge between Caillou Lake and the Gulf of 
                Mexico at a total cost of $56,300,000.
                    (B) Gulf Shoreline at Point Au Fer Island at a total 
                cost of $43,400,000.
                    (C) Modification of Caernarvon Diversion at a total 
                cost of $20,700,000.
                    (D) Modification of Davis Pond Diversion at a total 
                cost of $64,200,000.

[[Page 121 STAT. 1277]]

            (2) Reports.--Not later than December 31, 2009, the 
        Secretary shall submit feasibility reports on the projects 
        described in paragraph (1) to the Committee on Transportation 
        and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the 
        Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate.
            (3) Projects subject to reports.--
                    (A) Feasibility reports.--Not later than December 
                31, 2008, the Secretary shall submit to Congress 
                feasibility reports on the following projects referred 
                to in the restoration plan:
                          (i) Multipurpose Operation of Houma Navigation 
                      Lock at a total cost of $18,100,000.
                          (ii) Terrebonne Basin Barrier Shoreline 
                      Restoration at a total cost of $124,600,000.
                          (iii) Small Diversion at Convent/Blind River 
                      at a total cost of $88,000,000.
                          (iv) Amite River Diversion Canal Modification 
                      at a total cost of $5,600,000.
                          (v) Medium Diversion at White's Ditch at a 
                      total cost of $86,100,000.
                          (vi) Convey Atchafalaya River Water to 
                      Northern Terrebonne Marshes at a total cost of 
                      $221,200,000.
                    (B) Construction.--The Secretary may carry out the 
                projects under subparagraph (A) substantially in 
                accordance with the plans and subject to the conditions, 
                recommended in a final report of the Chief of Engineers 
                if a favorable report of the Chief is completed by not 
                later than December 31, 2010.
            (4) Construction.--No appropriations shall be made to 
        construct any project under this subsection if the report under 
        paragraph (2) or paragraph (3), as the case may be, has not been 
        approved by resolutions adopted by the Committee on 
        Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of 
        Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public 
        Works of the Senate.
SEC. 7007. NON-FEDERAL COST SHARE.

    (a) Credit.--The Secretary shall credit, in accordance with section 
221 of the Flood Control Act 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), toward the non-
Federal share of the cost of a study or project under this title the 
cost of work carried out in the coastal Louisiana ecosystem by the non-
Federal interest for the project before the date of the execution of the 
partnership agreement for the study or project.
    (b) Sources of Funds.--The non-Federal interest may use, and the 
Secretary shall accept, funds provided by a Federal agency under any 
other Federal program, to satisfy, in whole or in part, the non-Federal 
share of the cost of the study or project if the Federal agency that 
provides the funds determines that the funds are authorized to be used 
to carry out the study or project.
    (c) Nongovernmental Organizations.--A nongovernmental organization 
shall be eligible to contribute all or a portion of the non-Federal 
share of the cost of a project under this title.
    (d) Treatment of Credit Between Projects.--Any credit provided under 
this section toward the non-Federal share of the cost of a study or 
project under this title may be applied toward

[[Page 121 STAT. 1278]]

the non-Federal share of the cost of any other study or project under 
this title.
    (e) Periodic Monitoring.--
            (1) In general.--To ensure that the contributions of the 
        non-Federal interest equal the non-Federal share of the cost of 
        a study or project under this title during each 5-year period 
        beginning after the date of commencement of the first study or 
        project under this title, the Secretary shall--
                    (A) monitor for each study or project under this 
                title the non-Federal provision of cash, in-kind 
                services and materials, and land, easements, rights-of-
                way, relocations, and disposal areas; and
                    (B) manage the requirement of the non-Federal 
                interest to provide for each such study or project cash, 
                in-kind services and materials, and land, easements, 
                rights-of-way, relocations, and disposal areas.
            (2) Other monitoring.--The Secretary shall conduct 
        monitoring separately for the study phase, construction phase, 
        preconstruction engineering and design phase, and planning phase 
        for each project authorized on or after the date of enactment of 
        this Act for all or any portion of the coastal Louisiana 
        ecosystem.

    (f) Audits.--Credit for land, easements, rights-of-way, relocations, 
and disposal areas (including land value and incidental costs) provided 
under this section, and the cost of work provided under this section, 
shall be subject to audit by the Secretary.
SEC. 7008. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding section 209 of the Flood Control 
Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962-2) or any other provision of law, in 
carrying out any project or activity under this title or any other 
provision of law to protect, conserve, and restore the coastal Louisiana 
ecosystem, the Secretary may determine that--
            (1) the project or activity is justified by the 
        environmental benefits derived by the coastal Louisiana 
        ecosystem; and
            (2) no further economic justification for the project or 
        activity shall be required if the Secretary determines that the 
        project or activity is cost effective.

    (b) Limitation on Applicability.--Subsection (a) shall not apply to 
any separable element of a project intended to produce benefits that are 
predominantly unrelated to the protection, preservation, and restoration 
of the coastal Louisiana ecosystem.
SEC. 7009. INDEPENDENT REVIEW.

    The <<NOTE: Establishment.>> Secretary shall establish a council, to 
be known as the ``Louisiana Water Resources Council'', which shall serve 
as the exclusive peer review panel for activities conducted by the Corps 
of Engineers in the areas in the State of Louisiana declared as major 
disaster areas in accordance with section 401 of the Robert T. Stafford 
Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5170) in 
response to Hurricane Katrina or Rita of 2005, in accordance with the 
requirements of section 2034.

[[Page 121 STAT. 1279]]

SEC. 7010. EXPEDITED REPORTS.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall expedite completion of the 
reports for the following projects and, if the Secretary determines that 
a project is feasible, proceed directly to project preconstruction 
engineering and design:
            (1) The projects identified in the study of comprehensive 
        hurricane protection authorized by title I of the Energy and 
        Water Development Appropriations Act, 2006 (119 Stat. 2447).
            (2) The projects identified in the Southwest Coastal 
        Louisiana hurricane and storm damage reduction study authorized 
        by the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the 
        House of Representatives on December 7, 2005.

    (b) Submission of Reports.--Upon completion of the reports 
identified in subsection (a), the Secretary shall submit the reports to 
the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate and the 
Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of 
Representatives.
SEC. 7011. REPORTING.

    Not later than 6 years after the date of enactment of this Act, the 
Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Transportation and 
Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on 
Environment and Public Works of the Senate a report, including a 
description of--
            (1) the projects authorized and undertaken under this title;
            (2) the construction status of the projects;
            (3) the cost to date and the expected final cost of each 
        project undertaken under this title; and
            (4) the benefits and environmental impacts of the projects.
SEC. 7012. NEW ORLEANS AND VICINITY.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary is authorized to--
            (1) raise levee heights where necessary and otherwise 
        enhance the Lake Pontchartrain and Vicinity project and the West 
        Bank and Vicinity project to provide the level of protection 
        necessary to achieve the certification required for a 100-year 
        level of flood protection in accordance with the national flood 
        insurance program under the base flood elevations current at the 
        time of construction of the levee;
            (2) modify the 17th Street, Orleans Avenue, and London 
        Avenue drainage canals in the city of New Orleans and install 
        pumps and closure structures at or near the lakefront at Lake 
        Pontchartrain;
            (3) armor critical elements of the New Orleans hurricane and 
        storm damage reduction system;
            (4) modify the Inner Harbor Navigation Canal to increase the 
        reliability of the flood protection system for the city of New 
        Orleans;
            (5) replace or modify certain non-Federal levees in 
        Plaquemines Parish to incorporate the levees into the New 
        Orleans to Venice Hurricane Protection project;
            (6) reinforce or replace flood walls in the existing Lake 
        Pontchartrain and Vicinity project and the existing West Bank 
        and Vicinity project to improve performance of the flood and 
        storm damage reduction systems;

[[Page 121 STAT. 1280]]

            (7) perform one time stormproofing of interior pump stations 
        to ensure the operability of the stations during hurricanes, 
        storms, and high water events;
            (8) repair, replace, modify and improve non-Federal levees 
        and associated protection measures in Terrebonne Parish; and
            (9) reduce the risk of storm damage to the greater New 
        Orleans metropolitan area by restoring the surrounding wetlands 
        through measures to begin to reverse wetland losses in areas 
        affected by navigation, oil and gas, and other channels and 
        through modification of the Caernarvon Freshwater Diversion 
        structure or its operations.

    (b) Cost Sharing.--Activities authorized by subsection (a) and 
section 7013 shall be carried out in a manner that is consistent with 
the cost-sharing requirements specified in the Emergency Supplemental 
Appropriations Act for Defense, the Global War on Terror, and Hurricane 
Recovery, 2006 (Public Law 109-234).
    (c) <<NOTE: Notification.>> Conditions.--The Secretary shall notify 
the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of 
Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the 
Senate if estimates for the expenditure of funds on any single project 
or activity identified in subsection (a) exceeds the amount specified 
for that project or activity in the Emergency Supplemental 
Appropriations Act for Defense, the Global War on Terror, and Hurricane 
Recovery, 2006. No appropriation in excess of 25 percent above the 
amount specified for a project or activity in such Act may be made until 
an increase in the level of expenditure has been approved by resolutions 
adopted by the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the 
House of Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public 
Works of the Senate.
SEC. 7013. MISSISSIPPI RIVER-GULF OUTLET.

    (a) Deauthorization.--
            (1) <<NOTE: Effective date.>> In general.--Effective 
        beginning on the date of submission of the plan required under 
        paragraph (3), the navigation channel portion of the Mississippi 
        River-Gulf Outlet element of the project for navigation, 
        Mississippi River, Baton Rouge to the Gulf of Mexico, authorized 
        by the Act entitled ``An Act to authorize construction of the 
        Mississippi River-Gulf outlet'', approved March 29, 1956 (70 
        Stat. 65) and modified by section 844 of the Water Resources 
        Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4177) and section 326 of the 
        Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3717), which 
        extends from the Gulf of Mexico to Mile 60 at the southern bank 
        of the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, is not authorized.
            (2) Scope.--Nothing in this paragraph modifies or 
        deauthorizes the Inner Harbor navigation canal replacement 
        project authorized by that Act of March 29, 1956.
            (3) Closure and restoration plan.--
                    (A) <<NOTE: Deadline. Reports.>> In general.--Not 
                later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this 
                Act, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on 
                Environment and Public Works of the Senate and the 
                Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the 
                House of Representatives a final report on the 
                deauthorization of the Mississippi River-Gulf outlet, as 
                described under the heading ``Investigations'' under

[[Page 121 STAT. 1281]]

                chapter 3 of title II of the Emergency Supplemental 
                Appropriations Act for Defense, the Global War on 
                Terror, and Hurricane Recovery, 2006 (120 Stat. 453).
                    (B) Inclusions.--At a minimum, the report under 
                subparagraph (A) shall include--
                          (i) a plan to physically modify the 
                      Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet and restore the 
                      areas affected by the navigation channel;
                          (ii) a plan to restore natural features of the 
                      ecosystem that will reduce or prevent damage from 
                      storm surge;
                          (iii) a plan to prevent the intrusion of 
                      saltwater into the waterway;
                          (iv) efforts to integrate the recommendations 
                      of the report with the program authorized under 
                      section 7003 and the analysis and design 
                      authorized by title I of the Energy and Water 
                      Development Appropriations Act, 2006 (119 Stat. 
                      2247); and
                          (v) consideration of--
                                    (I) use of native vegetation; and
                                    (II) diversions of fresh water to 
                                restore the Lake Borgne ecosystem.
            (4) Construction.--The Secretary shall carry out a plan to 
        close the Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet and restore and protect 
        the ecosystem substantially in accordance with the plan required 
        under paragraph (3), if the Secretary determines that the 
        project is cost-effective, environmentally acceptable, and 
        technically feasible.
SEC. 7014. HURRICANE AND STORM DAMAGE REDUCTION.

    (a) Reports.--With respect to the projects identified in the 
analysis and design of comprehensive hurricane protection authorized by 
title I of the Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act, 2006 
(119 Stat. 2247), the Secretary shall submit, to the maximum extent 
practicable, specific project recommendations in a report developed 
under that title.
    (b) Emergency Procedures.--
            (1) In general.--If the President determines that a project 
        recommended in the analysis and design of comprehensive 
        hurricane protection under title I of the Energy and Water 
        Development Appropriations Act, 2006 could--
                    (A) address an imminent threat to life and property;
                    (B) prevent a dangerous storm surge from reaching a 
                populated area;
                    (C) prevent the loss of coastal areas that reduce 
                the impact of storm surge;
                    (D) benefit national energy security;
                    (E) protect emergency hurricane evacuation routes or 
                shelters; or
                    (F) address inconsistencies in hurricane protection 
                standards,
        the President may submit to the President pro tempore of the 
        Senate for authorization a legislative proposal relating to the 
        project, as the President determines to be appropriate.
            (2) <<NOTE: President.>> Prioritization.--In submitting 
        legislative proposals under paragraph (1), the President shall 
        give priority to any project that, as determined by the 
        President, would--

[[Page 121 STAT. 1282]]

                    (A) to the maximum extent practicable, reduce the 
                risk--
                          (i) of loss of human life;
                          (ii) to public safety; and
                          (iii) of damage to property; and
                    (B) minimize costs and environmental impacts.
            (3) Expedited consideration.--
                    (A) <<NOTE: Effective date.>> In general.--Beginning 
                after December 31, 2008, any legislative proposal 
                submitted by the President under paragraph (1) shall be 
                eligible for expedited consideration in accordance with 
                this paragraph.
                    (B) Introduction.--As soon as practicable after the 
                date of receipt of a legislative proposal under 
                paragraph (1), the Chairman of the Committee on 
                Environment and Public Works of the Senate shall 
                introduce the proposal as a bill, by request, in the 
                Senate.
                    (C) Referral.--A bill introduced under subparagraph 
                (B) shall be referred to the Committee on Environment 
                and Public Works of the Senate.
                    (D) Committee consideration.--
                          (i) <<NOTE: Deadline.>> In general.--Not later 
                      than 45 legislative days after a bill under 
                      subparagraph (B) is referred to the committee in 
                      accordance with subparagraph (C), the committee 
                      shall act on the bill.
                          (ii) Failure to act.--If the committee fails 
                      to act on a bill by the date specified in clause 
                      (i), the bill shall be discharged from the 
                      committee and placed on the calendar of the 
                      Senate.
            (4) Effective date.--The requirements of, and authorities 
        under, this subsection shall expire on December 31, 2010.
SEC. 7015. LAROSE TO GOLDEN MEADOW.

    (a) Report.--Not later than 120 days after the date of enactment of 
this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Environment and 
Public Works of the Senate and the Committee on Transportation and 
Infrastructure of the House of Representatives a report describing any 
modification required to the project for flood damage reduction, Larose 
to Golden Meadow, Louisiana, to provide the level of protection 
necessary to achieve the certification required for a 100-year level of 
flood protection in accordance with the national flood insurance 
program.
    (b) Modifications.--The Secretary is authorized to carry out a 
modification described in subsection (a) if--
            (1) the Secretary determines that the modification in the 
        report under subsection (a) is feasible; and
            (2) the total cost of the modification does not exceed 
        $90,000,000.

    (c) Requirement.--No appropriation shall be made to construct any 
modification under this section if the report under subsection (a) has 
not been approved by resolutions adopted by the Committee on Environment 
and Public Works of the Senate and the Committee on Transportation and 
Infrastructure of the House of Representatives.
SEC. 7016. LOWER JEFFERSON PARISH, LOUISIANA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary may carry out a project for flood 
damage reduction in Lower Jefferson Parish, Louisiana.

[[Page 121 STAT. 1283]]

    (b) Existing Studies.--In carrying out the project, the Secretary 
shall use, to the maximum extent practicable, existing studies for 
projects for flood damage reduction in the vicinity of Lower Jefferson 
Parish, Louisiana, prepared under section 205 of the Flood Control Act 
of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s).
    (c) Construction.--The Secretary may proceed to construction or 
complete the construction of projects in Lower Jefferson Parish if the 
projects are being developed or carried out under section 205 of the 
Flood Control Act of 1948 as of the date of enactment of this Act.
    (d) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated $100,000,000 to carry out this section.

    TITLE VIII--UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND ILLINOIS WATER-WAY SYSTEM

SEC. 8001. <<NOTE: 33 USC 652 note.>> DEFINITIONS.

    In this title, the following definitions apply:
            (1) Plan.--The term ``Plan'' means the project for 
        navigation and ecosystem improvements for the Upper Mississippi 
        River and Illinois Waterway System: Report of the Chief of 
        Engineers, dated December 15, 2004.
            (2) Upper mississippi river and illinois waterway system.--
        The term ``Upper Mississippi River and Illinois Waterway 
        System'' means the projects for navigation and ecosystem 
        restoration authorized by Congress for--
                    (A) the segment of the Mississippi River from the 
                confluence with the Ohio River, River Mile 0.0, to Upper 
                St. Anthony Falls Lock in Minneapolis-St. Paul, 
                Minnesota, River Mile 854.0; and
                    (B) the Illinois Waterway from its confluence with 
                the Mississippi River at Grafton, Illinois, River Mile 
                0.0, to T.J. O'Brien Lock in Chicago, Illinois, River 
                Mile 327.0.
SEC. 8002. <<NOTE: 33 USC 652 note.>> NAVIGATION IMPROVEMENTS AND 
                          RESTORATION.

    Except as modified by this title, the Secretary shall undertake 
navigation improvements and restoration of the ecosystem for the Upper 
Mississippi River and Illinois Waterway System substantially in 
accordance with the Plan and subject to the conditions described 
therein.
SEC. 8003. <<NOTE: 33 USC 652 note.>> AUTHORIZATION OF 
                          CONSTRUCTION OF NAVIGATION IMPROVEMENTS.

    (a) Small Scale and Nonstructural Measures.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary shall--
                    (A) construct mooring facilities at Locks 12, 14, 
                18, 20, 22, 24, and LaGrange Lock or other alternative 
                locations that are economically and environmentally 
                feasible;
                    (B) provide switchboats at Locks 20 through 25; and
                    (C) conduct development and testing of an 
                appointment scheduling system.
            (2) Authorization of appropriations.--The total cost of 
        projects authorized under this subsection shall be $256,000,000. 
        Such costs are to be paid half from amounts appropriated from 
        the general fund of the Treasury and half from amounts

[[Page 121 STAT. 1284]]

        appropriated from the Inland Waterways Trust Fund. Such sums 
        shall remain available until expended.

    (b) New Locks.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary shall construct new 1,200-
        foot locks at Locks 20, 21, 22, 24, and 25 on the Upper 
        Mississippi River and at LaGrange Lock and Peoria Lock on the 
        Illinois Waterway.
            (2) Authorization of appropriations.--The total cost of 
        projects authorized under this subsection shall be 
        $1,948,000,000. Such costs are to be paid half from amounts 
        appropriated from the general fund of the Treasury and half from 
        amounts appropriated from the Inland Waterways Trust Fund. Such 
        sums shall remain available until expended.

    (c) Concurrence.--The mitigation required for the projects 
authorized under subsections (a) and (b), including any acquisition of 
lands or interests in lands, shall be undertaken or acquired 
concurrently with lands and interests in lands for the projects 
authorized under subsections (a) and (b), and physical construction 
required for the purposes of mitigation shall be undertaken concurrently 
with the physical construction of such projects.
SEC. 8004. <<NOTE: 33 USC 652 note.>> ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION 
                          AUTHORIZATION.

    (a) Operation.--To ensure the environmental sustainability of the 
existing Upper Mississippi River and Illinois Waterway System, the 
Secretary shall modify, consistent with requirements to avoid adverse 
effects on navigation, the operation of the Upper Mississippi River and 
Illinois Waterway System to address the cumulative environmental impacts 
of operation of the system and improve the ecological integrity of the 
Upper Mississippi River and Illinois River.
    (b) Ecosystem Restoration Projects.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary shall carry out, consistent 
        with requirements to avoid adverse effects on navigation, 
        ecosystem restoration projects to attain and maintain the 
        sustainability of the ecosystem of the Upper Mississippi River 
        and Illinois River in accordance with the general framework 
        outlined in the Plan.
            (2) Projects included.--Ecosystem restoration projects may 
        include--
                    (A) island building;
                    (B) construction of fish passages;
                    (C) floodplain restoration;
                    (D) water level management (including water 
                drawdown);
                    (E) backwater restoration;
                    (F) side channel restoration;
                    (G) wing dam and dike restoration and modification;
                    (H) island and shoreline protection;
                    (I) topographical diversity;
                    (J) dam point control;
                    (K) use of dredged material for environmental 
                purposes;
                    (L) tributary confluence restoration;
                    (M) spillway, dam, and levee modification to benefit 
                the environment; and
                    (N) land and easement acquisition.
            (3) Cost sharing.--

[[Page 121 STAT. 1285]]

                    (A) In general.--Except as provided in subparagraphs 
                (B) and (C), the Federal share of the cost of carrying 
                out an ecosystem restoration project under this 
                subsection shall be 65 percent.
                    (B) Exception for certain restoration projects.--In 
                the case of a project under this section for ecosystem 
                restoration, the Federal share of the cost of carrying 
                out the project shall be 100 percent if the project--
                          (i) is located below the ordinary high water 
                      mark or in a connected backwater;
                          (ii) modifies the operation of structures for 
                      navigation; or
                          (iii) is located on federally owned land.
                    (C) Savings clause.--Nothing in this subsection 
                affects the applicability of section 906(e) of the Water 
                Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2283(e)).
                    (D) Nongovernmental organizations.--In accordance 
                with section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 
                U.S.C. 1962d-5b), for any project carried out under this 
                title, a non-Federal sponsor may include a nonprofit 
                entity, with the consent of the affected local 
                government.
            (4) Land acquisition.--The Secretary may acquire land or an 
        interest in land for an ecosystem restoration project from a 
        willing seller through conveyance of--
                    (A) fee title to the land; or
                    (B) a flood plain conservation easement.

    (c) Monitoring.--The Secretary shall carry out a long term resource 
monitoring, computerized data inventory and analysis, and applied 
research program for the Upper Mississippi River and Illinois River to 
determine trends in ecosystem health, to understand systemic changes, 
and to help identify restoration needs. The program shall consider and 
adopt the monitoring program established under section 1103(e)(1)(A)(ii) 
of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 
652(e)(1)(A)(ii)).
    (d) Ecosystem Restoration Preconstruction Engineering and Design.--
            (1) Restoration design.--Before initiating the construction 
        of any individual ecosystem restoration project, the Secretary 
        shall--
                    (A) establish ecosystem restoration goals and 
                identify specific performance measures designed to 
                demonstrate ecosystem restoration;
                    (B) establish the without-project condition or 
                baseline for each performance indicator; and
                    (C) for each separable element of the ecosystem 
                restoration, identify specific target goals for each 
                performance indicator.
            (2) Outcomes.--Performance measures identified under 
        paragraph (1)(A) shall include specific measurable environmental 
        outcomes, such as changes in water quality, hydrology, or the 
        well-being of indicator species the population and distribution 
        of which are representative of the abundance and diversity of 
        ecosystem-dependent aquatic and terrestrial species.
            (3) Restoration design.--Restoration design carried out as 
        part of ecosystem restoration shall include a monitoring

[[Page 121 STAT. 1286]]

        plan for the performance measures identified under paragraph 
        (1)(A), including--
                    (A) a timeline to achieve the identified target 
                goals; and
                    (B) a timeline for the demonstration of project 
                completion.

    (e) Consultation and Funding Agreements.--
            (1) In general.--In carrying out the environmental 
        sustainability, ecosystem restoration, and monitoring activities 
        authorized in this section, the Secretary shall consult with the 
        Secretary of the Interior and the States of Illinois, Iowa, 
        Minnesota, Missouri, and Wisconsin.
            (2) Funding agreements.--The Secretary is authorized to 
        enter into agreements with the Secretary of the Interior, the 
        Upper Mississippi River Basin Association, and natural resource 
        and conservation agencies of the States of Illinois, Iowa, 
        Minnesota, Missouri, and Wisconsin to provide for the direct 
        participation of and transfer of funds to such entities for the 
        planning, implementation, and evaluation of projects and 
        programs established by this section.

    (f) Specific Projects Authorization.--
            (1) In general.--There is authorized to be appropriated to 
        carry out this subsection $1,717,000,000, of which not more than 
        $245,000,000 shall be available for projects described in 
        subsection (b)(2)(B) and not more than $48,000,000 shall be 
        available for projects described in subsection (b)(2)(J). Such 
        sums shall remain available until expended.
            (2) Limitation on available funds.--Of the amounts made 
        available under paragraph (1), not more than $35,000,000 in any 
        fiscal year may be used for land acquisition under subsection 
        (b)(4).
            (3) Individual project limit.--Other than for projects 
        described in subparagraphs (B) and (J) of subsection (b)(2), the 
        total cost of any single project carried out under this 
        subsection shall not exceed $25,000,000.
            (4) Monitoring.--In addition to amounts authorized under 
        paragraph (1), there are authorized $10,420,000 per fiscal year 
        to carry out the monitoring program under subsection (c) if such 
        sums are not appropriated pursuant to section 1103(e)(4) the 
        Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 652(e)(4)).

    (g) Implementation Reports.--
            (1) In general.--Not later than June 30, 2009, and every 4 
        years thereafter, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on 
        Environment and Public Works of the Senate and the Committee on 
        Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of 
        Representatives an implementation report that--
                    (A) includes baselines, milestones, goals, and 
                priorities for ecosystem restoration projects; and
                    (B) measures the progress in meeting the goals.
            (2) Advisory panel.--
                    (A) <<NOTE: Establishment.>> In general.--The 
                Secretary shall appoint and convene an advisory panel to 
                provide independent guidance in the development of each 
                implementation report under paragraph (1).
                    (B) Panel members.--Panel members shall include--

[[Page 121 STAT. 1287]]

                          (i) one representative of each of the State 
                      resource agencies (or a designee of the Governor 
                      of the State) from each of the States of Illinois, 
                      Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, and Wisconsin;
                          (ii) one representative of the Department of 
                      Agriculture;
                          (iii) one representative of the Department of 
                      Transportation;
                          (iv) one representative of the United States 
                      Geological Survey;
                          (v) one representative of the United States 
                      Fish and Wildlife Service;
                          (vi) one representative of the Environmental 
                      Protection Agency;
                          (vii) one representative of affected 
                      landowners;
                          (viii) two representatives of conservation and 
                      environmental advocacy groups; and
                          (ix) two representatives of agriculture and 
                      industry advocacy groups.
                    (C) Chairperson.--The Secretary shall serve as 
                chairperson of the advisory panel.
                    (D) Application of federal advisory committee act.--
                The Advisory Panel and any working group established by 
                the Advisory Panel shall not be considered an advisory 
                committee under the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 
                U.S.C. App.).

    (h) Ranking System.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary, in consultation with the 
        Advisory Panel, shall develop a system to rank proposed 
        projects.
            (2) Priority.--The ranking system shall give greater weight 
        to projects that restore natural river processes, including 
        those projects listed in subsection (b)(2).
SEC. 8005. <<NOTE: 33 USC 652 note.>> COMPARABLE PROGRESS.

    (a) In General.--As the Secretary conducts pre-engineering, design, 
and construction for projects authorized under this title, the Secretary 
shall--
            (1) select appropriate milestones;
            (2) determine, at the time of such selection, whether the 
        projects are being carried out at comparable rates; and
            (3) <<NOTE: Reports.>> make an annual report to Congress, 
        beginning in fiscal year 2009, regarding whether the projects 
        are being carried out at a comparable rate.

    (b) No Comparable Rate.--If the Secretary or Congress determines 
under subsection (a)(2) that projects authorized under this title are 
not moving toward completion at a comparable rate, annual funding 
requests for the projects shall be adjusted to ensure that the projects 
move toward completion at a comparable rate in the future.

[[Page 121 STAT. 1288]]

 TITLE <<NOTE: National Levee Safety Act of 2007.>> IX--NATIONAL LEVEE 
SAFETY PROGRAM
SEC. 9001. <<NOTE: 33 USC 3301 note.>> SHORT TITLE.

    This title may be cited as the ``National Levee Safety Act of 
2007''.
SEC. 9002. <<NOTE: 33 USC 3301.>> DEFINITIONS.

    In this title, the following definitions apply:
            (1) Committee.--The term ``committee'' means the Committee 
        on Levee Safety established by section 9003(a).
            (2) Inspection.--The term ``inspection'' means an actual 
        inspection of a levee--
                    (A) to establish the global information system 
                location of the levee;
                    (B) to determine the general condition of the levee; 
                and
                    (C) to estimate the number of structures and 
                population at risk and protected by the levee that would 
                be adversely impacted if the levee fails or water levels 
                exceed the height of the levee.
            (3) Levee.--
                    (A) In general.--The term ``levee'' means an 
                embankment, including floodwalls--
                          (i) the primary purpose of which is to provide 
                      hurricane, storm, and flood protection relating to 
                      seasonal high water, storm surges, precipitation, 
                      and other weather events; and
                          (ii) that normally is subject to water loading 
                      for only a few days or weeks during a year.
                    (B) Inclusion.--The term includes structures along 
                canals that constrain water flows and are subject to 
                more frequent water loadings but that do not constitute 
                a barrier across a watercourse.
            (4) State.--The term ``State'' means--
                    (A) a State;
                    (B) the District of Columbia;
                    (C) the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico; and
                    (D) any other territory or possession of the United 
                States.
            (5) State levee safety agency.--The term ``State levee 
        safety agency'' means the agency of a State that has regulatory 
        authority over the safety of any non-Federal levee in the State.
            (6) United states.--The term ``United States'', when used in 
        a geographical sense, means all of the States.
SEC. 9003. <<NOTE: 33 USC 3302.>> COMMITTEE ON LEVEE SAFETY.

    (a) Establishment.--There is established a committee to be known as 
the ``Committee on Levee Safety''.
    (b) Membership.--The committee shall be composed of 16 members as 
follows:
            (1) The Secretary (or the Secretary's designee), who shall 
        serve as the chairperson of the Committee.
            (2) The Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management 
        Agency (or the Administrator's designee).
            (3) The following 14 members appointed by the Secretary:

[[Page 121 STAT. 1289]]

                    (A) Eight representatives of State levee safety 
                agencies, one from each of the eight civil works 
                divisions of the Corps of Engineers.
                    (B) Two representatives of the private sector who 
                have expertise in levee safety.
                    (C) Two representatives of local and regional 
                governmental agencies who have expertise in levee 
                safety.
                    (D) Two representatives of Indian tribes who have 
                expertise in levee safety.

    (c) Duties.--
            (1) Development of recommendations for national levee safety 
        program.--The committee shall develop recomendations for a 
        national levee safety program, including a strategic plan for 
        implementation of the program.
            (2) Report.--Not later than 180 days after the date of 
        enactment of this Act, the committee shall submit to the 
        Secretary, the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of 
        the House of Representatives, and the Committee on Environment 
        and Public Works of the Senate a report containing the 
        recommendations developed under paragraph (1).

    (d) Purposes.--In developing recommendations under subsection 
(c)(1), the committee shall ensure that the national levee safety 
program meets the following goals:
            (1) Ensuring the protection of human life and property by 
        levees through the development of technologically, economically, 
        socially, and environmentally feasible programs and procedures 
        for hazard reduction and mitigation relating to levees.
            (2) Encouraging use of the best available engineering 
        policies and procedures for levee site investigation, design, 
        construction, operation and maintenance, and emergency 
        preparedness.
            (3) Encouraging the establishment and implementation of an 
        effective national levee safety program that may be delegated to 
        qualified States for implementation, including identification of 
        incentives and disincentives for State levee safety programs.
            (4) Ensuring that levees are operated and maintained in 
        accordance with appropriate and protective standards by 
        conducting an inventory and inspection of levees.
            (5) Developing and supporting public education and awareness 
        projects to increase public acceptance and support of State and 
        national levee safety programs.
            (6) Building public awareness of the residual risks 
        associated with living in levee protected areas.
            (7) Developing technical assistance materials for State and 
        national levee safety programs.
            (8) Developing methods to provide technical assistance 
        relating to levee safety to non-Federal entities.
            (9) Developing technical assistance materials, seminars, and 
        guidelines relating to the physical integrity of levees in the 
        United States.

    (e) Compensation of Members.--A member of the committee shall serve 
without compensation.
    (f) Travel Expenses.--To the extent amounts are made available in 
advance in appropriations Acts, the Secretary shall reimburse a member 
of the committee for travel expenses, including

[[Page 121 STAT. 1290]]

per diem in lieu of subsistence, at rates authorized for an employee of 
a Federal agency under subchapter I of chapter 57 of title 5, United 
States Code, while away from the home or regular place of business of 
the member in performance of services for the committee.
    (g) Applicability of Federal Advisory Committee Act.--The Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App.) shall not apply to the committee.
SEC. 9004. <<NOTE: 33 USC 3303.>> INVENTORY AND INSPECTION OF 
                          LEVEES.

    (a) Levee Database.--
            (1) <<NOTE: Deadline.>> In general.--Not later than one year 
        after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall 
        establish and maintain a database with an inventory of the 
        Nation's levees.
            (2) Contents.--The database shall include--
                    (A) location information of all Federal levees in 
                the Nation (including global information system 
                information) and, for non-Federal levees, such 
                information on levee location as is provided to the 
                Secretary by State and local governmental agencies;
                    (B) utilizing such information as is available, the 
                general condition of each levee; and
                    (C) an estimate of the number of structures and 
                population at risk and protected by each levee that 
                would be adversely impacted if the levee fails or water 
                levels exceed the height of the levee.
            (3) Availability of information.--
                    (A) Availability to federal, state, and local 
                governmental agencies.--The Secretary shall make all of 
                the information in the database available to appropriate 
                Federal, State, and local governmental agencies.
                    (B) Availability to the public.--The Secretary shall 
                make the information in the database described in 
                paragraph (2)(A), and such other information in the 
                database as the Secretary determines appropriate, 
                available to the public.

    (b) Inventory and Inspection of Levees.--
            (1) Federal levees.--The Secretary, at Federal expense, 
        shall establish an inventory and conduct an inspection of all 
        federally owned and operated levees.
            (2) Federally constructed, nonfederally operated and 
        maintained levees.--The Secretary shall establish an inventory 
        and conduct an inspection of all federally constructed, non-
        federally operated and maintained levees, at the original cost 
        share for the project.
            (3) Participating levees.--For non-Federal levees the owners 
        of which are participating in the emergency response to natural 
        disasters program established under section 5 of the Act 
        entitled ``An Act authorizing the construction of certain public 
        works on rivers and harbors for flood control, and for other 
        purposes'', approved August 18, 1941 (33 U.S.C. 701n), the 
        Secretary shall establish an inventory and conduct an inspection 
        of each such levee if the owner of the levee requests such 
        inspection. The Federal share of the cost of an inspection under 
        this paragraph shall be 65 percent.
SEC. 9005. <<NOTE: 33 USC 3304.>> LIMITATIONS ON STATUTORY 
                          CONSTRUCTION.

    Nothing in this title shall be construed as--

[[Page 121 STAT. 1291]]

            (1) creating any liability of the United States or its 
        officers or employees for the recovery of damages caused by an 
        action or failure to act; or
            (2) relieving an owner or operator of a levee of a legal 
        duty, obligation, or liability incident to the ownership or 
        operation of a levee.
SEC. 9006. <<NOTE: 33 USC 3305.>> AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    There is authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary to carry out 
this title $20,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2008 through 2013.

Nancy Pelosi

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Robert C. Byrd

President of the Senate pro tempore.

                  IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, U.S.

November 6, 2007.

  The House of Representatives having proceeded to reconsider the bill 
(H.R. 1495) entitled ``An Act to provide for the conservation and 
development of water and related resources, to authorize the Secretary 
of the Army to construct various projects for improvements to rivers and 
harbors of the United States, and for other purposes'', returned by the 
President of the United States with his objections, to the House of 
Representatives, in which it originated, it was
  Resolved, That the said bill pass, two-thirds of the House of 
Representatives agreeing to pass the same.

Lorraine C. Miller

Clerk.

   I certify that this Act originated in the House of Representatives.

  

Lorraine C. Miller

Clerk.

[[Page 121 STAT. 1292]]

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES,

November 8, 2007.

  The Senate having proceeded to reconsider the bill (H.R. 1495) 
entitled ``An Act to provide for the conservation and development of 
water and related resources, to authorize the Secretary of the Army to 
construct various projects for improvements to rivers and harbors of the 
United States, and for other purposes'', returned by the President of 
the United States with his objections, to the House of Representatives, 
in which it originated, and passed by the House of Representatives on 
reconsideration of the same, it was
  Resolved, That the said bill pass, two-thirds of the Senators present 
having voted in the affirmative.

Nancy Erickson

Secretary.

      

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 1495 (S. 1248):
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOUSE REPORTS: Nos. 110-80 (Comm. on Transportation and Infrastructure) 
and 110-280 (Comm. of Conference).
SENATE REPORTS: No. 110-58 accompanying S. 1248 (Comm. on Environment 
and Public Works).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 153 (2007):
            Apr. 19, considered and passed House.
            May 14-16, considered and passed Senate, amended.
            Aug. 1, House agreed to conference report.
            Sept. 24, Senate agreed to conference report.
WEEKLY COMPILATION OF PRESIDENTIAL DOCUMENTS, Vol. 43 (2007):
            Nov. 2, Presidential veto message.
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 153 (2007):
            Nov. 6, House overrode veto.
            Nov. 8, Senate overrode veto.

                                  <all>
```