alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     Exhibit 15



                   Letter Re: Unaudited Financial Information

Board of Directors and Shareholders
TRW Inc.

We are aware of the incorporation by reference in the following registration
statements and in the related prospectuses of our reports dated April 19, 2000
and July 26, 2000 relating to the unaudited consolidated interim financial
statements of TRW Inc. that are included in its Forms 10-Q for the quarters
ended March 31, 2000 and June 30, 2000:

                         Form S-3       333-89133
                         Form S-3       333-48443
                         Form S-8       333-36052
                         Form S-8       333-27003
                         Form S-8       333-27001
                         Form S-8       333-20351
                         Form S-8       333-06633
                         Form S-8       333-03973
                         Form S-8       33-53503
                         Form S-8       33-29751
                         Form S-8       2-90748
                         Form S-8       2-64035



/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

August 14, 2000
Cleveland, Ohio
EXHIBIT 32.3


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


    Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), I, Angela
D.  Toppi, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Trans-Lux
Corporation (the "Registrant"), do hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge
that:

    (1) The Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
June 30, 2005 being filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

    (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

    This Certification accompanies this Form 10-Q as an exhibit, but shall not
be deemed as having been filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 or as a separate disclosure document of the Registrant or
the certifying officer.



                                           /s/ Angela D. Toppi
                                           -----------------------------
Date:  August 15, 2005                     Angela D. Toppi
                                           Executive Vice President and
                                           Chief Financial Officer
No. 49854.

#### Protest 101422-K of Elton Trading Corp. (New York).

Opinion by

Walker, J.

The case was ordered submitted and an examination of the official papers failed to disclose any reason which would warrant disturbing the action of the collector, which was held presumptively correct.
340000m.£,

143°

BATHYMETRIC MAP

a <n | Nose —
| 5
| |

1033

142°

GULF OF ALASKA
ICY BAY SOUTH

agoooom.€,

WiX

WW

SSS

ey

+6530000m.N)

yy
eS SZ

\“

530000m Ni.

B
is

ORLL SEAMOUNT NO 6-4

t
|

J

o

SENWAN

\Y\F

£

6440000m.N

G

Timo

$
g

1 CNS

oY

O14
a,

HaDM-E |

Bathymetry compiled by the National Ocean Service (NOS) from Bathymetric Data other than
NOS hydrographic surveys. This is a facsimile reproduction of the bathymetric manuscript and
does not necessarily represent the final published form. This information is not intended for
navigational’ purposes. .

Bathymetric Contour Intervals: 50 meters to maximum depth, supplemented by 10 meter
intervals

Datum: Mean Lower Low Water (MLLW).

Universal Transverse Mercator Grid. Zone 7; 10,000 meter ticks (---) are shown inside the
neatline.

Protraction Diagram data shown in a subdued (screened) black was compiled by the Minerals
Management Service (MMS).

THIS MAP IS NOT A LEGAL DOCUMENT for Federal feasing purposes; for such, purposes
use the MMS Outer Continental Shelf Official Protraction Diagrams.”

Heavy line(s) indicate limits of these protraction diagrams.

EVALUATION OF BATHYMETRIC DATA

iF
a

Bathymetry compiled by the National Ocean Service from
Random Tracklines and Bathymetric Surveys dated 1944 to 1980
The Bathymetric Data ranges in scale from 1:500:000 t
1:1,000,000 with a minimum line spacing of 3.0 and a maximum
line spacing of 15.0 nautical miles

Data corrected for sound velocity according to Echo-Sounding
Correction Tables, 1980.

OUTER CONTINENTAL SHELF RESOURCE MANAGEMENT MAP

UNITED “STATES ‘DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION
NATIONAL OCEAN SERVICE

1988

Produced at Washington, D.C.
for

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
MINERALS MANAGEMENT SERVICE

TRANSVERSE MERCATOR PROJECTION
Scale 1:250,000
10

5 oO 5 is 20 Statute Miles
——t —
75 ° 5 10 15 +20 25 30 Kilometers
= SS

5 ° 5 10 15 Nautical Miles
_

BATHYMETRIC DATA INDEX

56° |

Bathymetric data from sources other tian
NOS hydrographic surveys.

144°

qaie

58°

‘domong

‘ICY BAY SOUTH
NOS NO 7-3 (OCS)

INDEX TO ADJOINING SHEETS

a co"
semiotinr ie say
a ~ |
x
SURVEYOR we
SEACHANNEL ®
‘NO 6-6 fons
| - out
wel | od =

LON

oe
(Reap. Dec. 8963)

Entry No. 393.

#### Henry A. Wess, Inc. *v.*United States

(Decided August 15, 1957)

*Tompkins & Tompkins*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

*623Richardson, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisemenfc has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the Plaintiff and the Assistant Attorney General for the United States, Defendant, that the items marked “A” and initialed LEM by Examiner L. E. Mangett on the invoice covered by the above named appeal, consist of flatware from Denmark.

> That at the time of exportation flatware such as or similar to that as marked “A” and initialed by the Examiner was being freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for home consumption at the invoice unit prices, net packed, and that the “export value” as defined in Section 402 (d), Tariff Act of 1930, was not higher.

> The above named reappraisement appeal is submitted for decision upon this stipulation.

On the agreed facts, I find the export value, as that value is defined in 19 U. S. C. section 1402 (d) (section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930), to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such value was the invoice unit prices, net packed.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-1573

DANIEL JOHNSON WILLIS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INCORPORATED; BERT ROBERTS, CEO; MCI NETWORK SERVICES; DOUG KELLY, Vice President, Defendants - Appellees, and GTE/SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION; WILLIAM MCDONALD, CEO, President; VAN MONROE, Customer Contact Manager; SPRINT, Defendants.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Greenville. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-97-183-5-H) Submitted: September 8, 1998 Decided: September 18, 1998 Before MURNAGHAN, WILKINS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.2 Daniel Johnson Willis, Appellant Pro Se. Julian Hugh Wright, Jr., ROBINSON, BRADSHAW & HINTON, P.A., Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:Daniel Johnson Willis appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Willis v. MCI Telecommunications, Inc. , No. CA-97- 183-5-H (E.D.N.C. Apr. 2, 1998). We grant Willis’s motion for “appeals court to exercise jurisdiction in Defendants/Appellees Rule 38 motion” to the extent that Willis seeks to have this courtdecide the Appellees’ Fed. R. App. P. 38 motion. We deny the Appellees’ Fed. R. App. P. 38 motion for sanctions. We dispense withoral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# Official Journal C 411A/11 O

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 411A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6411 October 2021 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 411A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6411 October 2021

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Commission |
| 2021/C 411 A/01 | Directorate-General Migration and Home Affairs — Publication of a vacancy for the function of Principal Adviser (Grade AD 14) (Article 29(2) of the Staff Regulations) COM/2021/10407 | 1 |

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Commission

2021/C 411 A/01

Directorate-General Migration and Home Affairs — Publication of a vacancy for the function of Principal Adviser (Grade AD 14) (Article 29(2) of the Staff Regulations) COM/2021/10407

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Council on the Arts and the Humanities

Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463 as amended) notice is hereby given that a meeting of the Arts and Artifacts Indemnity Panel of the Federal Council on the Arts and the Humanities will be held at 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20506, in Room 716, from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m., on Monday, May 7, 2007. 

The purpose of the meeting is to review applications for Certificates of Indemnity submitted to the Federal Council on the Arts and the Humanities for exhibitions beginning after January 1, 2007. 

Because the proposed meeting will consider financial and commercial data and because it is important to keep values of objects, methods of transportation and security measures confidential, pursuant to the authority granted me by the Chairman's Delegation of Authority to Close Advisory Committee Meetings, dated July 19, 1993, I have determined that the meeting would fall within exemption (4) of 5 U.S.C. 552(b) and that it is essential to close the meeting to protect the free exchange of views and to avoid interference with the operations of the committee. 

It is suggested that those desiring more specific information contact Acting Advisory Committee Management Officer, Heather Gottry, 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20506, or call 202-606-8322. 

Heather Gottry, 

Acting Advisory Committee Management Officer. 

 [FR Doc. E7-7526 Filed 4-19-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7536-01-P
#### Allan Jensen *v.*United States

No. 6691.

Entry No. 12843.

Invoice dated Dumfries, Scotland, December 15, 1941.

Certified December 16, 1941.

Entered at New York, N. Y., February 5, 1942.

(Decided December 30, 1946)

*Lane & Wallace*for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Cole, Judge (Abstract):

This appeal for reappraisement of various items of merchandise concerns the so-called British purchase tax, described in the law of the United Kingdom entitled, “Finance (No. 2) Act 1940 3 & 4 Geo. 6 Ch. 48.” The said tax was held not to be an item to be included in foreign value as defined in section 402 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended by the Customs Administrative Act of 1938 (19 U. S. C. 1940 ed. § 1402 (c)). *United States*v. *Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp.,*33 C. C. P. A. 183, C. A. D. 334.

An agreed set of facts shows export value, section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. 1940 ed. § 1402 (d)), to be the proper basis for appraisement of the instant merchandise, and that such statutory values for the articles in question are the appraised values less additions made by the importer on entry because of advances In similar cases.
AO 450 (Rev. 5/85) Judgment in a Civil Case

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

Eastern Division 

CHAD KISTER,

Plaintiff,

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE

vs.

 CASE NO. 2:13-cv-00071

APPALACHIAN BEHAVIORAL JUDGE EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR.

HEALTH CARE, et al., MAGISTRATE JUDGE TERENCE P. KEMP

Defendants.

Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues have

been tried and the jury has rendered its verdict.

Decision by Court. A decision has been rendered by the Court without a hearing or trial.

Pursuant to the Opinion and Order filed January 23, 2014, JUDGMENT is hereby

entered DISMISSING this case.

Date: January 23, 2014 JOHN P. HEHMAN, CLERK

/S/ Andy F. Quisumbing 

(By) Andy F. Quisumbing

 Courtroom Deputy Clerk

Case: 2:13-cv-00071-EAS-TPK Doc #: 16 Filed: 01/23/14 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Exhibit 15(b)
                                                               
                                                               



UniSource Energy Corporation
Tucson Electric Power Company
220 West Sixth Street
Tucson, Arizona  85701

We have made a review, in accordance with standards established
by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, of
the unaudited interim financial information of UniSource Energy
Corporation and subsidiaries (the Company) and Tucson Electric
Power Company and subsidiaries (TEP) for the period ended March 31,
1997 as indicated in our report dated February 23, 1998; 
because we did not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on 
that information.

We are aware that our report referred to above, which was
included in your Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended March 31, 1998 is incorporated by reference in
Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement No. 33-
55732 of TEP on Form S-3, Registration Statement No. 333-
43765, No. 333-43767 and No. 333-43769 of the Company on  
Form S-8.

We are also aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to
Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered
a part of the Registration Statement prepared or certified by
an accountant or a report prepared or certified by an
accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.



DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Tucson, Arizona
May 12, 1998
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

REPUBLIC WATER COMPANY OF 

TEXAS, LLC,

 

 Appellant,

v.

MIDDLE PECOS GROUNDWATER 

CONSERVATION DISTRICT,

 Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-17-00001-CV

Appeal from the

112th District Court

of Pecos County, Texas 

(TC# P-11956-112-CV)

O R D E R

Pending before the Court is the Appellant’s motion to extend mediation. The motion is 

DENIED, and the Court ORDERS this appeal to continue. The appellate timetable suspension is 

lifted and the Reporter’s Record shall now be filed in this Court on or before March 31, 2017. 

Further, the Court has this day filed the Clerk’s Record (1 volume) which was received on February 

23, 2017 for the above styled and numbered cause.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 1

st day of March, 2017.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez and Palafox, JJ.
U.S. Department of 

Transportation 

Office of the Secretary of Transportation 

I 200 New Jersey A venue, S.E. 

Washington, DC 20590 

Mr. Mark W. Atwood 

Cozen 0 ' Connor 

1627 I St., NW, Ste. I I 00 

Washington, D.C. 20006 

Issue date: September 23, 2014 

Authority expires: October 2, 2014 

NOTICE OF CONSISTENCY 

Kalitta Air, L.L.C. 

is a properly certificated carrier that holds authority to conduct charter operations to and from Chma. Based on 

a proposal submitted by the carrier, we have determined that the operations comply with the applicable 

Department regulations and the provisions of the 2014-2015 U.S. -China Protocol. 

Number of Flights: one (1) one-way charter 1 

Flight Date(s): September 30, 20I4 

Points: Shanghai (PVG)- Khabarovsk (KHV*) - Anchorage (ANC*) - Chicago (ORD) 

Equipment: Boeing 747-200F or B747-400BCF 

The U.S. carrier operating the above charter flight should report, in writing, to the U.S. Air Carrier Licensing 

Division (X-44), Office of International Aviation, Department ofTransportation, on its operation for the 

preceding month by the tenth of each month whether the flights operated. 

This notice is valid only for the flight contained in the above program. 

* Denotes technical stop only. 

An electronic version of this document is available on the World Wide Web at: 

www.regu/ations. gov 

1 Following our grant of Kalitta Air L.L.C. 's request for one ( I) one-way charter allocation, 58 one-way charter allocations remain 

available in the Zone I charter pool for the 20 14115 charter year.
EXHIBIT 32.1


                  CERTIFICATION OF CO-CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


    Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), I, Michael
R.  Mulcahy, President and Co-Chief Executive Officer of Trans-Lux Corporation,
do hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge that:

    (1) The Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
June 30, 2005 being filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

    (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

    This Certification accompanies this Form 10-Q as an exhibit, but shall not
be deemed as having been filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 or as a separate disclosure document of the Registrant or
the certifying officer.



                                        /s/ Michael R. Mulcahy
                                        ----------------------------------------
Date:  August 15, 2005                  Michael R. Mulcahy
                                        President and Co-Chief Executive Officer
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER 

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Union Planters Corporation (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report") I, Jackson W. Moore, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>           5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          26,908
<SECURITIES>                                 3,015,040
<RECEIVABLES>                                  879,030
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,297,839
<PP&E>                                      79,989,989
<DEPRECIATION>                              27,719,382
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              64,114,570
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        9,584,293
<BONDS>                                     30,620,418
<COMMON>                                       178,430
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                  22,634,089
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                64,114,570
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,237,939
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,962,531
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,078
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             733,856
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                535,474
<INCOME-TAX>                                   197,970
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            337,504
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   337,504
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.97
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Before the Third Division,

December 6, 1944

No. 49843.

#### Protest 60723-K of Earl Bond (Pembina).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

When the case was called for hearing no appearance was made by the plaintiff. The entry was liquidated on November 2, 1939; and the protest filed April 2, 1941. Counsel for Government moved to dismiss the protest since the entry was not- filed within 60 days after liquidation as required under section 514, Tariff Act of 1930. The Government’s motion to dismiss was therefore granted by the court.