Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 76 / Monday, April 21, 2014 / Proposed Rules 22069 

association intends to present no 

matters other than: 

(A) The election of directors; 

(B) The election, approval or 

ratification of accountants; 

(C) A Security holder proposal 

included pursuant to SEC Rule 14(a)–8 

(17 CFR 240.14a–8); and 

(D) The approval or ratification of a 

plan as defined in paragraph (a)(7)(ii) of 

Item 402 of SEC Regulation S–K (17 CFR 

229.402(a)(7)(ii)) or amendments to such 

a plan; and 

(ii) The bank or State savings 

association does not comment upon or 

refer to a solicitation in opposition (as 

defined in 17 CFR 240.14a–6) in 

connection with the meeting in its 

proxy material. 

* * * * * 

(f) * * * 

(2) The FDIC may, upon the written 

request of the bank or State savings 

association, and where consistent with 

the protection of investors, permit the 

omission of one or more of the 

statements or disclosures herein 

required, or the filing in substitution 

therefor of appropriate statements or 

disclosures of comparable character. 

* * * * * 

§ 335.901 [Removed] 

■ 8. Remove § 335.901. 

PART 390—REGULATIONS 

TRANSFERRED FROM THE OFFICE OF 

THRIFT SUPERVISION 

■ 9. The authority citation for part 390 

is revised to read as follows: 

Authority: 12 U.S.C. 1819. 

Subpart A also issued under 12 U.S.C. 

1820. 

Subpart B also issued under 12 U.S.C. 

1818. 

Subpart C also issued under 5 U.S.C. 504; 

554–557; 12 U.S.C. 1464; 1467; 1468; 1817; 

1818; 1820; 1829; 3349, 4717; 15 U.S.C. 78l; 

78o–5; 78u–2; 28 U.S.C. 2461 note; 31 U.S.C. 

5321; 42 U.S.C. 4012a. 

Subpart D also issued under 12 U.S.C. 

1817; 1818; 1820; 15 U.S.C. 78l. 

Subpart E also issued under 12 U.S.C. 

1813; 1831m; 15 U.S.C. 78. 

Subpart F also issued under 5 U.S.C. 552; 

559; 12 U.S.C. 2901 et seq. 

Subpart G also issued under 12 U.S.C. 2810 

et seq., 2901 et seq.; 15 U.S.C. 1691; 42 U.S.C. 

1981, 1982, 3601–3619. 

Subpart I also issued under 12 U.S.C. 

1831x. 

Subpart J also issued under 12 U.S.C. 

1831p–1. 

Subpart K also issued under 12 U.S.C. 

1817; 1818; 15 U.S.C. 78c; 78l. 

Subpart L also issued under 12 U.S.C. 

1831p–1. 

Subpart M also issued under 12 U.S.C. 

1818. 

Subpart N also issued under 12 U.S.C. 

1821. 

Subpart O also issued under 12 U.S.C. 

1828. 

Subpart P also issued under 12 U.S.C. 

1470; 1831e; 1831n; 1831p–1; 3339. 

Subpart Q also issued under 12 U.S.C. 

1462; 1462a; 1463; 1464. 

Subpart R also issued under 12 U.S.C. 

1463; 1464; 1831m; 1831n; 1831p–1. 

Subpart S also issued under 12 U.S.C. 

1462; 1462a; 1463; 1464; 1468a; 1817; 1820; 

1828; 1831e; 1831o; 1831p–1; 1881–1884; 

3207; 3339; 15 U.S.C. 78b; 78l; 78m; 78n; 

78p; 78q; 78w; 31 U.S.C. 5318; 42 U.S.C. 

4106. 

Subpart T also issued under 12 U.S.C. 

1462a; 1463; 1464; 15 U.S.C. 78c; 78l; 78m; 

78n; 78w. 

Subpart V also issued under 12 U.S.C. 

3201–3208. 

Subpart W also issued under 12 U.S.C. 

1462a; 1463; 1464; 15 U.S.C. 78c; 78l; 78m; 

78n; 78p; 78w. 

Subpart X also issued under 12 U.S.C. 

1462; 1462a; 1463; 1464; 1828; 3331 et seq. 

Subpart Y also issued under 12 U.S.C. 

1831o. 

Subpart Z also issued under 12 U.S.C. 

1462; 1462a; 1463; 1464; 1828 (note). 

PART 390 Subpart U—[Removed and 

Reserved] 

■ 10. Remove and reserve part 390 

subpart U, consisting of §§ 390.390 

through 390.395. 

■ 11. In § 390.321, revise paragraph 

(b)(2) to read as follows: 

§ 390.321 Regulatory reports. 

* * * * * 

(b) * * * 

(2) Exceptions. Regulatory reporting 

requirements that are not consistent 

with GAAP, if any, are not required to 

be reflected in the audited financial 

statements, including financial 

statements contained in securities 

filings submitted to the FDIC pursuant 

to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 

or subpart W and 12 CFR part 192. 

* * * * * 

§ 390.380 [Amended] 

■ 12. In § 390.380, remove paragraph 

(a)(3). 

Dated at Washington, DC, this 8th day of 

April 2014. 

By order of the Board of Directors. 

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. 

Robert E. Feldman, 

Executive Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2014–08261 Filed 4–18–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6714–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 39 

[Docket No. FAA–2014–0250; Directorate 

Identifier 2013–NM–165–AD] 

RIN 2120–AA64 

Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier, 

Inc. Airplanes 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking 

(NPRM). 

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new 

airworthiness directive (AD) for certain 

Bombardier, Inc. Model CL–600–2B16 

(CL–604 Variant) airplanes. This 

proposed AD was prompted by reports 

of in-flight uncommanded rudder 

movements. This proposed AD would 

require revising the airplane flight 

manual (AFM) to incorporate an 

uncommanded yaw motion procedure. 

We are proposing this AD to prevent inflight uncommanded rudder 

movements, which could lead to 

structural failure and subsequent loss of 

the airplane. 

DATES: We must receive comments on 

this proposed AD by June 5, 2014. 

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by 

any of the following methods: 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to 

http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the 

instructions for submitting comments. 

• Fax: (202) 493–2251. 

• Mail: U.S. Department of 

Transportation, Docket Operations, M– 

30, West Building Ground Floor, Room 

W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., 

Washington, DC 20590. 

• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of 

Transportation, Docket Operations, M– 

30, West Building Ground Floor, Room 

W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., 

Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 

p.m., Monday through Friday, except 

Federal holidays. 

For service information identified in 

this proposed AD, contact Bombardier, 

Inc., 400 Coˆte-Vertu Road West, Dorval, 

Que ́bec H4S 1Y9, Canada; telephone 

514–855–5000; fax 514–855–7401; email 

thd.crj@aero.bombardier.com; Internet 

http://www.bombardier.com. You may 

view this referenced service information 

at the FAA, Transport Airplane 

Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., 

Renton, WA. For information on the 

availability of this material at the FAA, 

call 425–227–1221. 

Examining the AD Docket 

You may examine the AD docket on 

the Internet at http://


ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
22070 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 76 / Monday, April 21, 2014 / Proposed Rules 

www.regulations.gov by searching for 

and locating Docket No. FAA–2014– 

0250; or in person at the Docket 

Management Facility between 9 a.m. 

and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

except Federal holidays. The AD docket 

contains this proposed AD, the 

regulatory evaluation, any comments 

received, and other information. The 

street address for the Docket Operations 

office (telephone (800) 647–5527) is in 

the ADDRESSES section. Comments will 

be available in the AD docket shortly 

after receipt. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Luke Walker, Aerospace Engineer, 

Airframe and Mechanical Systems 

Branch, ANE–171, FAA, New York 

Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), 1600 

Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, 

NY 11590; telephone 516–228–7363; fax 

516–794–5531. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Comments Invited 

We invite you to send any written 

relevant data, views, or arguments about 

this proposed AD. Send your comments 

to an address listed under the 

ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No. 

FAA–2014–0250; Directorate Identifier 

2013–NM–165–AD’’ at the beginning of 

your comments. We specifically invite 

comments on the overall regulatory, 

economic, environmental, and energy 

aspects of this proposed AD. We will 

consider all comments received by the 

closing date and may amend this 

proposed AD based on those comments. 

We will post all comments we 

receive, without change, to http://

www.regulations.gov, including any 

personal information you provide. We 

will also post a report summarizing each 

substantive verbal contact we receive 

about this proposed AD. 

Discussion 

Transport Canada Civil Aviation 

(TCCA), which is the aviation authority 

for Canada, has issued Canadian 

Airworthiness Directive CF–2013–22, 

dated August 12, 2013 (referred to after 

this as the Mandatory Continuing 

Airworthiness Information, or ‘‘the 

MCAI’’), to correct an unsafe condition 

for certain Bombardier, Inc. Model CL– 

600–2B16 (CL–604 Variant) airplanes. 

The MCAI states: 

There have been several reported incidents 

where Bombardier Regional Jet aeroplanes 

experienced in-flight uncommanded rudder 

movements. Investigation revealed that a 

failure of the voltage regulator inside the yaw 

damper actuator could lead to uncommanded 

yaw movement. If not corrected, this 

condition could lead to structural failure and 

the subsequent loss of the aeroplane. 

Since the Challenger 604 aeroplanes have 

the same system, and can also experience a 

similar problem of uncommanded yaw 

movement, Transport Canada is issuing this 

[Canadian] AD that mandates the 

introduction of an emergency procedure to 

the Aeroplane Flight Manual (AFM) to 

address the above-mentioned unsafe 

condition. 

You may examine the MCAI in the 

AD docket on the Internet at http://

www.regulations.gov by searching for 

and locating Docket No. FAA–2014– 

0250. 

Relevant Service Information 

Bombardier, Inc. has issued 

emergency procedures for the applicable 

AFMs: 

• For Model CL–600–2B16 (CL–604 

Variant) airplanes having serial numbers 

(S/Ns) 5301 through 5665 inclusive: 

Procedure 1.C., Uncommanded Yaw 

Motion, of Section 03–06, Automatic 

Flight Control System, of Chapter 3— 

Emergency Procedures, of the 

Bombardier Challenger CL–604 AFM, 

PSP 604–1, Revision 89, dated July 8, 

2013; and 

• For Model CL–600–2B16 (CL–604 

Variant) airplanes having S/Ns 5701 and 

subsequent: Procedure 1.C., 

Uncommanded Yaw Motion, of Section 

03–06, Automatic Flight Control 

System, of Chapter 3—Emergency 

Procedures, of the Bombardier 

Challenger CL–605 AFM, PSP 605–1, 

Revision 25, dated July 8, 2013. 

The actions described in this service 

information are intended to correct the 

unsafe condition identified in the 

MCAI. 

FAA’s Determination and Requirements 

of This Proposed AD 

This product has been approved by 

the aviation authority of another 

country, and is approved for operation 

in the United States. Pursuant to our 

bilateral agreement with the State of 

Design Authority, we have been notified 

of the unsafe condition described in the 

MCAI and service information 

referenced above. We are proposing this 

AD because we evaluated all pertinent 

information and determined an unsafe 

condition exists and is likely to exist or 

develop on other products of the same 

type design. 

Costs of Compliance 

We estimate that this proposed AD 

affects 116 airplanes of U.S. registry. 

We also estimate that it would take 

about 1 work-hour per product to 

comply with the basic requirements of 

this proposed AD. The average labor 

rate is $85 per work-hour. Required 

parts would cost about $0 per product. 

Based on these figures, we estimate the 

cost of this proposed AD on U.S. 

operators to be $9,860, or $85 per 

product. 

Authority for This Rulemaking 

Title 49 of the United States Code 

specifies the FAA’s authority to issue 

rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, 

section 106, describes the authority of 

the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII: 

Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more 

detail the scope of the Agency’s 

authority. 

We are issuing this rulemaking under 

the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII, 

Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: 

General requirements.’’ Under that 

section, Congress charges the FAA with 

promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in 

air commerce by prescribing regulations 

for practices, methods, and procedures 

the Administrator finds necessary for 

safety in air commerce. This regulation 

is within the scope of that authority 

because it addresses an unsafe condition 

that is likely to exist or develop on 

products identified in this rulemaking 

action. 

Regulatory Findings 

We determined that this proposed AD 

would not have federalism implications 

under Executive Order 13132. This 

proposed AD would not have a 

substantial direct effect on the States, on 

the relationship between the national 

Government and the States, or on the 

distribution of power and 

responsibilities among the various 

levels of government. 

For the reasons discussed above, I 

certify this proposed regulation: 

1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ under Executive Order 12866; 

2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures 

(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); 

3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in 

Alaska; and 

4. Will not have a significant 

economic impact, positive or negative, 

on a substantial number of small entities 

under the criteria of the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act. 

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 

Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation 

safety, Incorporation by reference, 

Safety. 

The Proposed Amendment 

Accordingly, under the authority 

delegated to me by the Administrator, 

the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 

39 as follows: 


ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 76 / Monday, April 21, 2014 / Proposed Rules 22071 

PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS 

DIRECTIVES 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 39 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. 

§ 39.13 [Amended] 

■ 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding 

the following new airworthiness 

directive (AD): 

Bombardier, Inc.: Docket No. FAA–2014– 

0250; Directorate Identifier 2013–NM– 

165–AD. 

(a) Comments Due Date 

We must receive comments by June 5, 

2014. 

(b) Affected ADs 

None. 

(c) Applicability 

This AD applies to Bombardier, Inc. Model 

CL–600–2B16 (CL–604 Variants) airplanes, 

certificated in any category, serial numbers 

(S/Ns) 5301 through 5665 inclusive, and 

5701 and subsequent. 

(d) Subject 

Air Transport Association (ATA) of 

America Code 22, Autopilot System; and 

Code 27, Rudder Actuator. 

(e) Reason 

This AD was prompted by reports of inflight uncommanded rudder movements. We 

are issuing this AD to prevent in-flight 

uncommanded rudder movements, which 

could lead to structural failure and 

subsequent loss of the airplane. 

(f) Compliance 

Comply with this AD within the 

compliance times specified, unless already 

done. 

(g) Airplane Flight Manual (AFM) Revision 

Within 30 days after the effective date of 

this AD, revise the Emergency Procedures 

Section of the applicable Bombardier AFM to 

incorporate the uncommanded yaw motion 

procedure specified in paragraph (g)(1) or 

(g)(2) of this AD, as applicable. 

(1) For Model CL–600–2B16 (CL–604 

Variant) airplanes having S/Ns 5301 through 

5665 inclusive: Procedure 1.C., 

Uncommanded Yaw Motion, of Section 03– 

06, Automatic Flight Control System, of 

Chapter 3—Emergency Procedures, of the 

Bombardier Challenger CL–604 AFM, PSP 

604–1, Revision 89, dated July 8, 2013. 

(2) For Model CL–600–2B16 (CL–604 

Variant) airplanes having S/Ns 5701 and 

subsequent: Procedure 1.C., Uncommanded 

Yaw Motion, of Section 03–06, Automatic 

Flight Control System, of Chapter 3— 

Emergency Procedures, of the Bombardier 

Challenger CL–605 AFM, PSP 605–1, 

Revision 25, dated July 8, 2013. 

(h) Other FAA AD Provisions 

The following provisions also apply to this 

AD: 

(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance 

(AMOCs): The Manager, FAA, New York 

Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), ANE–170, 

has the authority to approve AMOCs for this 

AD, if requested using the procedures found 

in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 

39.19, send your request to your principal 

inspector or local Flight Standards District 

Office, as appropriate. If sending information 

directly to the New York ACO, send it to 

ATTN: Program Manager, Continuing 

Operational Safety, FAA, New York ACO, 

1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, 

NY 11590; telephone 516–228–7300; fax 

516–794–5531. Before using any approved 

AMOC, notify your appropriate principal 

inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, 

the manager of the local flight standards 

district office/certificate holding district 

office. The AMOC approval letter must 

specifically reference this AD. 

(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement 

in this AD to obtain corrective actions from 

a manufacturer, use these actions if they are 

FAA-approved. Corrective actions are 

considered FAA-approved if they were 

approved by the State of Design Authority (or 

its delegated agent, or the Design Approval 

Holder with a State of Design Authority’s 

design organization approval, as applicable). 

You are required to ensure the product is 

airworthy before it is returned to service. 

(i) Related Information 

(1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing 

Airworthiness Information (MCAI) Canadian 

Airworthiness Directive CF–2013–22, dated 

August 12, 2013, for related information. 

This MCAI may be found in the AD docket 

on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov 

by searching for and locating Docket No. 

FAA–2014–0250. 

(2) For service information identified in 

this AD, contact Bombardier, Inc., 400 CoˆteVertu Road West, Dorval, Que ́bec H4S 1Y9, 

Canada; telephone 514–855–5000; fax 514– 

855–7401; email thd.crj@

aero.bombardier.com; Internet http://

www.bombardier.com. You may view this 

service information at the FAA, Transport 

Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., 

Renton, WA. For information on the 

availability of this material at the FAA, call 

425–227–1221. 

Issued in Renton, Washington, on April 14, 

2014. 

Jeffrey E. Duven, 

Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, 

Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. 2014–08986 Filed 4–18–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

Coast Guard 

33 CFR Part 1 

[Docket No. USCG–2008–1259] 

RIN 1625–AB32 

Assessment Framework and 

Organizational Restatement Regarding 

Preemption for Certain Regulations 

Issued by the Coast Guard 

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. 

ACTION: Proposed rule; notice of public 

meetings; request for comments. 

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard announces 

two public meetings to receive 

comments on a notice of proposed 

rulemaking addressing the Coast 

Guard’s assessment framework for, and 

restating its position regarding, the 

federalism implications of regulations 

issued under the authority of various 

statutes within Titles 33 and 46 of the 

United States Code. The meetings will 

be held in two locations in order to 

allow for greater public involvement. 

DATES: The public meetings will be held 

on the following dates: 

• Arlington, VA [Washington, DCarea], May 13, 2014, from 12:30 p.m. to 

3 p.m. 

• Seattle, WA, May 16, 2014, from 

12:30 p.m. to 3 p.m. 

The meetings may conclude before 

the allotted time if all matters for 

discussion have been addressed. 

Written comments and related material 

may also be submitted to Coast Guard 

personnel specified at that meeting. 

Those who plan to attend should 

notify the Coast Guard of their plans by 

May 6, 2014, using the contact 

information in the FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT section of this 

notice. 

The comment period for the proposed 

rule closes May 26, 2014. All comments 

and related material submitted after the 

meeting must either be submitted to our 

online docket via http://

www.regulations.gov on or before May 

26, 2014, or reach the Docket 

Management Facility by that date. 

ADDRESSES: The public meetings will be 

held at the following locations: 

• Arlington, VA [Washington, DCarea]—U.S. Coast Guard Personnel 

Service Center (PSC), 4200 Wilson 

Boulevard, Alexander Hamilton Room, 

9th floor, Arlington, VA 20598–7200 

• Seattle, WA—Henry M. Jackson 

Federal Building, 915 Second Avenue, 

North Auditorium, Room 3448, Seattle, 

WA 98174–1067 


ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1