alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT 

 1800 Washington Boulevard • Baltimore MD 21230 

 410-537-3000 • 1-800-633-6101• www.mde.state.md.us 

Robert M. Summers, Ph.D. 

Secretary 

Kathy M. Kinsey 

Deputy Secretary 

artin O’Malley 

overnor 

nthony G. Brown 

eutenant Governor 

M

G

A

Li

Maryland Department of the Environment 

Notice of Public Hearing on Air Quality Plan 

The Maryland Department of the Environment (MDE) gives notice of a Public Hearing concerning 

the revised 110 (a) (2) infrastructure SIP for the 2008 lead (Pb) national ambient air quality 

standard. 

 

A public hearing will be held on: 

December 5, 2012, at the Department of the Environment, 1800 Washington Boulevard, 

Baltimore, Maryland 21230 – First Floor Conference Room – 10:00 AM 

The Maryland Department of the Environment (MDE) will hold a public hearing, on the above State 

Implementation Plan (SIP) addressing implementation, maintenance, and enforcement measures for the lead 

(Pb) national ambient air quality standard. 

 

The public hearing will be held as required by federal law (Clean Air Act at 42 U.S.C. 7410 (a) and 40 CFR 

51.102). After consideration of comments received, the plans will be finalized and submitted to the United 

States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to revise the State Implementation Plan required by the Clean 

Air Act. 

The proposed plan documents have been made available on the Maryland Department of the Environment's 

website at 

http://www.mde.state.md.us/programs/Air/AirQualityPlanning/Pages/programs/airprograms/air_planni

ng/index.aspx

NOTE: the public library systems in the region can be used for Internet access to view the documents. 

Copies of the documents can be viewed at the Maryland Department of the Environment Office, Air and 

Radiation Management Administration, 1800 Washington Boulevard, Suite 730, Baltimore, Maryland - Contact: 

Jim Wilkinson or Sally Frampton 

Comments may be presented at the hearing, mailed, emailed, or faxed to Jim Wilkinson, Maryland Department 

of the Environment, Air and Radiation Management Administration,1800 Washington Boulevard, Baltimore, 

MD, 21230, Fax # 410-537-3202, or to jwilkinson@mde.state.md.us. The comments must be received before 

close of business December 5, 2012. 

Persons in need of special accommodations should contact the Department's Office of Fair Practices at 410-537-

3964 at least five (5) business days in advance of the hearing. TTY users should contact the Department 

through the Maryland Relay Service at 410-537-4396. 

 Recycled Paper www. mde.state.md.us TTY Users 1-800-735-2258 

Via Maryland Relay Service 
Page 2 

 Recycled Paper www.mde.state.md.us TTY Users 1-800-735-2258 

 Via Maryland Relay Service

For more information contact Jim Wilkinson at (410) 537-3240 (Toll free in Maryland call (800) 633-6101 ext. 

3240) or jwilkinson@mde.state.md.us. 

Maryland Department of the Environment 

Air and Radiation Management Administration 

1800 Washington Boulevard, Ste. 730 

Baltimore, Maryland 21230
No. 51154.

#### Protests 54113-K, etc., of Trinacria Importing Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as that passed upon in *Stephen Rug Mills*v. *United States*(32 C. C. P. A. 110, C. A. D. 293), and by the court’s decision on remand in Abstract 50056. In accordance therewith the protests were sustained as claimed.
# C_2016156EN.01001902.xml

| 2.5.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 156/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.5.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 156/19

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 3 March 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék — Hungary) — Daimler AG v Együd Garage Gépjárműjavító és Értékesítő Kft.

(Case C-179/15) (1)

1

((References for a preliminary ruling - Trade marks - Directive 2008/95/EC - Article 5(1) - Advertisements relating to a third party accessible on the internet - Unauthorised use of the mark - Advertisements published online without the knowledge and without the consent of that third party or maintained online despite the opposition of that third party - Action of the trade mark proprietor against that third party))

(2016/C 156/27)

Language of the case: Hungarian

Referring court

Referring court

Fővárosi Törvényszék

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Daimler AG

Applicant:

Defendant: Együd Garage Gépjárműjavító és Értékesítő Kft.

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 5(1)(a) and (b) of Directive 2008/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2008 to approximate the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks must be interpreted as meaning that a third party, who is named in an advertisement on a website, which contains a sign identical or similar to a trade mark in such a way as to give the impression that there is a commercial relationship between him and the proprietor of the trade mark, does not make use of that sign that may be prohibited by that proprietor under that provision, where that advertisement has not been placed by that third party or on his behalf or, if that advertisement has been placed by that third party or on his behalf with the consent of the proprietor, where that third party has expressly requested the operator of that website, from whom the third party ordered the advertisement, to remove the advertisement or the reference to the mark contained therein.

---

(1)  OJ C 228, 13.7.2015.

1

---
Exhibit 31.1
                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Laurence. S. Levy, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Regency Affiliates,
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal control
over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: August 19, 2003


                                                     /s/ Laurence S. Levy
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                         Laurence S. Levy
                                                         Chief Executive Officer
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to**

** Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

** **

I, James H. Perry, as ChiefFinancial Officer of United Industrial Corporation (the “Company”) certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

 

a.               the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qfor the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the U.S.Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”) fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

b.              the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Date: May 9, 2005

 

 
| /s/ James H.  Perry      |   |
|--------------------------|--------|
| James H.  Perry          |
| Chief  Financial Officer |

 

----
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Commercial Mortgage  Servicing**D1050-084, 8th Fl  401 South Tryon Street.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|--------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

Reference is hereby made tothat certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of February 1, 2016, byand among BANC OF AMERICA MERRILL LYNCH COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE INC., as Depositor,WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, C-III ASSETMANAGEMENT LLC, as Special Servicer, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION asCertificate Administrator, U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, PARKBRIDGE LENDER SERVICES LLC, as Operating Advisor and PARK BRIDGE LENDERSERVICES LLC, as Asset Representations Reviewer with respect to CommercialMortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2016-C28 (the "Agreement").Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meaningsassigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 11.09 ofthe Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial MortgageServices do hereby certify that:

 

1. A review of the activitiesof the Master Servicer during the period from February 1, 2016 through December31, 2016 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance per theAgreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and 

 

2. To the best of myknowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of itsobligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

 

 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, theundersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2017.

 

 

/s/ Daniel Bober 

Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President

Wells Fargo Bank

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll  go far |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------|
REGULATORY EVALUATION

Directorate Identifier: 2013-NM-033-AD

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific 

requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of 

transportation?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)
BEFOR E TH E DEPARTMEN T O F TRANSPORTATIO N WASHINGTON , D . C .

Motio no f EXECUTIV E AIRLINES , INC . d/b/ a AMERICANEAGL E fo r confidentia l treatmen t unde r Rul e 1 2 (Form41 , Schedul e B-43 ) DOT-OST-1996-158 7

MOTIO NO F EXECUTIV E AIRLINES , INC . d/b/ a AMERICA NEAGL E FO RCONFIDENTIA L

TREATMEN T UNDE RRUL E 1 2 Communication s wit hrespec t t o thi s documen t shoul db e sen t to ; PETE RM . BOWLE R Presiden t America nEagl e Airlines , Inc . P.O . Bo x619616 , M D 549 4 DF WAirport , Texa s 7526 1 KATHLEE NSOLE D Vic e Presiden t & Genera l Counse l 7\mericanEagl e Airlines , Inc . P.O . Bo x619616 , M D 549 4 DF WAirport , Texa s 7526 1 (817 ) 967-157 4 kate.soledSaa.co m CAR L B . NELSON , JR . Associat e Genera l Counse l America nAirlines , Inc . 110 1 17t hStreet , N.W . Suit e 60 0 Washington , D.C . 2003 6 (202 ) 496-564 7 carl . nelson(3a a . co m

Marc h30 , 201 0BEFOR E TH E DEPARTMEN T O F TRANSPORTATIO N WASHINGTON , D . C .

Motio no f EXECUTIV E AIRLINES , INC . d/b/ a AMERICANEAGL E fo r confidentia l treatmen t unde r Rul e 1 2 (Form41 , Schedul e B-43 ) DOT-OST-1996-158 7

MOTIO NO F EXECUTIV E AIRLINES , INC . d/b/ a AMERICA NEAGL E FO RCONFIDENTIA L

TREATMEN T UNDE RRUL E 1 2 Executiv e Airlines , Inc . d/b/a/7\merica nEagle , unde r 1 4 CF R302.12 , herebymove s tha t th e enclose dFor m4 1 Schedul e B-4 3 fo r YE0 9 b e accorde d confidentia l treatmen t an db e withhel d fro mpubli c disclosure . Th e informatio nfo r whic h confidentia l treatmen t i s requeste dpertain s t o Executive' s airframe s an d aircraf t engin e acquisition s an dretirements . A s provide d i nRul e 12 , thi s informatio ni s i na seale denvelop e marke d "Confidentia l Treatmen t Requeste dUnde r Rul e 12 .- 2 -

O nJun e 5 , 1995 , bylette r o f Jame s W . Mitchell , Director , Offic e o f Airlin e Statistics , th e Departmen t grante d confidentia l treatmen t fo r a 10-yea r perio dt o simila r dat a file d byAmerica nAirlines , Inc . Fo r th e reason s state di nMr . Mitchell' s letter , th e Departmen t shoul dals o gran t confiden

tia l treatmen t fo r 1 0 year s t o Executive' s data .

WHEREFORE , Executiv e Airline s move s tha t th e schedule s submitte d unde r sea l wit hthi s motio nb e withhel d fro mpubli c disclosur e unde r Rul e 1 2 fo r a perio do f 1 0 years . Respectfull ysubmitted . 

# W6ni ^

CAR L B . NELSON , JR . Associat e Genera l Counse l America nAirlines , Inc . O nbehal f o f Executiv e Airlines , Inc . d/b/ a /AmericanEagl e Marc h30 , 201 0
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 71 (Friday, April 13, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 18728]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-7069]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Railroad Administration


Notice of Petitions for Approval; Railroad Safety Program Plans

    Although not required, the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) is 
providing notice that it has received petitions for approval of two 
Railroad Safety Program Plans (RSPP) submitted pursuant to 49 Code of 
Federal Regulations (CFR) part 236, subpart H. The individual petitions 
are described below, including the party seeking approval and the 
requisite docket numbers where the petitions and any related 
information may be found. These documents are available for public 
inspection; however, FRA is not accepting public comment on the 
documents as this notice is provided for information only.

Alaska Railroad Corporation (ARRC)

[Waiver Docket Number FRA-2007-27600]

    ARRC submitted a petition for approval of an RSPP. The petition, 
the RSPP, and any related documents have been placed in the requisite 
docket and are available for public inspection.

Norfolk Southern Corporation (NS)

[Waiver Docket Number FRA-2006-26260]

    NS submitted a petition for approval of an RSPP. The petition, the 
RSPP, and any related documents have been placed in the requisite 
docket and are available for public inspection.
    All documents in the public docket are also available for 
inspection and copying on the Internet at the docket facility's Web 
site at http://dms.dot.gov.
    You may review DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal 
Register published on April 11, 2000 (Volume 65, Number 70; Pages 
19477-78). The Statement may also be found at http://dms.dot.gov.

    Issued in Washington, DC on April 9, 2007.
Grady C. Cothen Jr.,
Deputy Associate Administrator for Safety Standards and Program 
Development.
 [FR Doc. E7-7069 Filed 4-12-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-06-P
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

MICHAEL L. HAAS,

Plaintiff,

v.

WARDEN, ROSS CORRECTIONAL 

INSTITUTION,

Defendant.

Case No. 2:13-cv-31

Judge Peter C. Economus

ORDER

This matter is before the Court for consideration of the July 5, 2013 Report and 

Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. (Dkt. 10.) The Magistrate Judge recommended that 

the Court dismiss this action. He found that Petitioner’s Ground Two, a claim that the verdict 

was against the manifest weight of the evidence, cannot be considered on the merits in an action 

for habeas corpus relief filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The Magistrate Judge found no merit in 

Petitioner’s Grounds One, Three, and Four; for insufficiency of the evidence, prosecutorial 

misconduct, and ineffective assistance of counsel, respectively.

The Report and Recommendation specifically advised the parties that failure to object to 

the Report and Recommendation within fourteen days results in a “waiver of the right to de novo

review by the District Judge and waiver of the right to appeal the judgment of the District 

Court.” (Dkt. 10 at 26.) The Magistrate Judge granted Petitioner’s motion for an extension of 

time to file objections, ordering that objections be filed no later than August 19, 2013. More 

than two weeks following this deadline, Petitioner has filed neither objections nor a second 

motion for an extension. 

The Court reviewed the Report and Recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). 

Finding the Report and Recommendation to be well-reasoned, and noting that no objections have 

Case: 2:13-cv-00031-PCE-TPK Doc #: 14 Filed: 09/03/13 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
2

been filed and that the time for filing such objections has expired, the Court ADOPTS the 

Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s action is 

DISMISSED, and the Clerk is DIRECTED to remove this action from the Court’s pending case 

list.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Case: 2:13-cv-00031-PCE-TPK Doc #: 14 Filed: 09/03/13 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
28 August 2006

Email: GroverThomas@bp.guardian.com

Guardian Fiberglass

1000 East North Street

Albion, MI 49224

Attention: Mr. Grover Thomas, Environmental Engineer

Subject: Guardian Winnsboro, SC Fiberglass Curing Oven RTO, Ref. McGill 

AirClean Job # H-1766-9

Mr. Thomas:

Per your request, we have included a write-up on verifying the RTO destruction efficiency:

Verification of RTO Destruction Efficiency

The VOC destruction efficiency obtained by thermal oxidation is dependent on three 

variables: retention time, temperature, and turbulence. For a given installation, the retention 

time and turbulence are fixed for the design flow conditions, and only the temperature can be 

varied. Most VOC’s can be effectively oxidized or destroyed at a temperature of 1400 °F, 

given the residence time in the combustion chamber.

The main variable that controls the destruction efficiency in an RTO is the combustion 

chamber temperature. Normal operating temperature in the combustion chamber is set to 

1500°F, and our VOC outlet guarantee is based on operating at this temperature. Our VOC 

outlet guarantee is 95% destruction or reduced to 10 ppm, whichever is less stringent. 

Please do not hesitate to call if you have any other questions. 

Thank you,

Thomas J. Shay

Thomas J. Shay

McGill AirClean LLC

Sales Manager

Direct: (614) 542-2479

cc: J. Childress – file JLT/R H-1766-9

T. Maurer

G. Lowry

J. Hubler
# Official Journal L 316/2016

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 316 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5923 November 2016 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 316

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5923 November 2016

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Regulation (EU) 2016/2029 of 10 November 2016 amending Council Regulation (EC) No 338/97 on the protection of species of wild fauna and flora by regulating trade therein | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Regulation (EU) 2016/2029 of 10 November 2016 amending Council Regulation (EC) No 338/97 on the protection of species of wild fauna and flora by regulating trade therein

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-2052

WYMON GRIFFIN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

PROFESSIONAL POLICE & SECURITY SERVICE; ALMAMY CONAKRY; FOOD LION, INCORPORATED, Store #635,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert J. Conrad, Jr., Chief District Judge. (3:07-cv-00425-RJC-DCK)

Submitted: March 12, 2009 Decided: March 16, 2009

Before MOTZ and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Wymon Griffin, Appellant Pro Se. Walter Lewis Smith, Jr., ROBINSON, ELLIOTT & SMITH, Charlotte, North Carolina; Julie Lynn Bell, PATTERSON DILTHEY, LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:

Wymon Griffin appeals the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Griffin

v. Professional Police & Security Serv. , No. 3:07-cv-00425-RJCDCK (W.D.N.C. Aug. 21, 2008). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED