T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T J UA N M AN UEL T I NCOPA- SANCHEZ, a. k. a. Juan S anchez- T i ncop a, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 09- 70943 A ge nc yN o. A 099- 577- 131 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d F e bruary21, 2012 ** B efo re: F E RN A N D E Z , M cK E O W N , an dB Y B E E , C i rcu i tJu d g es. Jua n M anue l T i nc opa - S anc he z , ana t i ve a nd c i t i z e n of P e ru, pe t i t i ons f

or re vi ew of the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ order di sm i ss i ng hi s app ea l fr om an i m m i gr a t i on j udge ’ s de c i s i on de ny i ng hi s appl i c a t i on f ora s y l um , w i thhol di ng of



# FI LED MA R 06 2012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS09- 70943 2 r e m ova l , and pr ot e c t i on unde rthe C onve nt i on A ga i ns tT ortur e ( “ C A T ” ) . W e ha ve j uri sdi ct i on un der 8 U . S . C . § 1 25 2. W e r evi ew for s ub st ant i alevi dence, IN S v. E l i as - Zac ar i as , 502 U . S . 478, 481 & n. 1 ( 1992) , a nd w e de nythe pe t i t i on f or r e v i e w. S ub st an t i al ev i d en ce sup p o rt s th e ag en cy’ s d en i al o f asyl u m b ecau se T i nc opa - S anc he z f

a i l e d t o e s t abl i s h the ha rm he s uf f e r e d, orf e ar s , f r om the S h in in g P a th is o n a c c o u n t o f a n im p u te dp o litic a l o p in io n . Se e i d. at 4 8 1 n .1 (“[t]o rev erse th e B IA fi n d i n g w e m u stfi n dth atth e ev i d en ce n o to n l y su p p o rt s that c o n c lu s io n , b u t co m

p el s it” ) ( e m p h a s is in o r ig in a l) ; P arussim ova v. Mukasey , 555 F . 3d 734, 740 ( 9th C i r . 2009) ( “ [ t ] he R e a l I D A c tr e qui r e s tha tapr ot e c t e d gr ound re pres ent‘ on e c entra l re as on ’ for an asy l um appl i cant ’ s per se cut i on ”) ; Cru zNa v a rr o v . I

NS , 232 F . 3d 1024, 1030 ( 9th C i r . 2000) ( pol i c e of f i c e rthr e a t e ne d by S h i n i n g P ath g u erri l l as b ecau se th ey b el i ev edh e w as an i n fo rm an td i dn o test ab l i sh pe r s e c ut i on on a c c ountof a n i m put e d pol i t i c a l opi ni on) . A c c or di ngl y , w e de nythe p e t i t i o n a s t o Ti n c o p a - San c h e z ’ s a s y l u m c l a i m. B e c aus e T i nc opa - S anc he z f a i l e d t o e s t abl i s h e l i gi bi l i tyf ora s y l um , he n e c e s s a r ilyf

a ile dto m e e t th e m o r e s tr in g e n t s tan d ar df o rw ith h o ld in g o f

r e m o v a l. See Zehat

ye v. G on zales , 45 3 F . 3d 11 82 , 11 90 (9th C i r. 20 06 ).09- 70943 3 F i na l l y , T i nc opa - S anc he z f a i l e d t o r a i s e a nys ubs t ant i ve c ha l l e nge t o the d e n ia l o f h is C A T c la im . Se e M a r t i n ez - Se rra n o v . I

NS , 9 4 F .3 d1 2 5 6 , 1 2 5 9 - 6 0 ( 9 th C i r. 19 96 ) ( i ss ues notaddres se d i n the ar gu m entpo rt i on of a bri ef ar e dee m ed w a iv e d ) . P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.