Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 80 / Thursday April 26, 2007 / Proposed Rules 20787 

(2) For Model A310–200 airplanes: Prior to 

the accumulation of 40,000 total flight cycles 

from the first flight of the airplane, or within 

30 days after the effective date of this AD, 

whichever occurs later. 

(3) Actions done before the effective date 

of this AD in accordance with Airbus Service 

Bulletin A310–53–2045, dated March 11, 

1988; Revision 1, dated June 16, 1988; 

Revision 2, dated September 7, 1988; 

Revision 3, dated October 4, 1989; or 

Revision 4, dated April 20, 1990; is 

acceptable for compliance with the 

requirements of this AD. 

FAA AD Differences 

Note: This AD differs from the MCAI and/ 

or service information as follows: No 

differences. 

Other FAA AD Provisions 

(g) The following provisions also apply to 

this AD: 

(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance 

(AMOCs): The Manager, International 

Branch, ANM–116, Transport Airplane 

Directorate, FAA, has the authority to 

approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested 

using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. 

Send information to ATTN: Tom Stafford, 

Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, 

ANM–116, FAA, Transport Airplane 

Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, 

Washington 98057–3356; telephone (425) 

227–1622; fax (425) 227–1149. Before using 

any AMOC approved in accordance with 

§ 39.19 on any airplane to which the AMOC 

applies, notify the appropriate principal 

inspector in the FAA Flight Standards 

Certificate Holding District Office. 

(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement 

in this AD to obtain corrective actions from 

a manufacturer or other source, use these 

actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective 

actions are considered FAA-approved if they 

are approved by the State of Design Authority 

(or their delegated agent). You are required 

to assure the product is airworthy before it 

is returned to service. 

(3) Reporting Requirements: For any 

reporting requirement in this AD, under the 

provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act, 

the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) 

has approved the information collection 

requirements and has assigned OMB Control 

Number 2120–0056. 

Related Information 

(h) Refer to MCAI European Aviation 

Safety Agency Airworthiness Directive 2006–

0367, dated December 5, 2006; and Airbus 

Service Bulletin A310–53–2045, Revision 05, 

dated July 20, 2006; for related information. 

Issued in Renton, Washington, on April 19, 

2007. 

Ali Bahrami, 

Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, 

Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. E7–7998 Filed 4–25–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 73 

[Docket No. FAA–2007–27850; Airspace 

Docket No. 07–ASO–5] 

RIN 2120–AA66 

Proposed Amendment to Restricted 

Areas R–3702A and R–3702B Fort 

Campbell, KY 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking 

(NPRM). 

SUMMARY: This action proposes to 

amend the designated altitudes of 

restricted areas R–3702A and R–3702B, 

Fort Campbell, KY, to better 

accommodate training requirements and 

provide greater access to the airspace for 

nonparticipating aircraft flying through 

the area above 10,000 feet MSL. 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before June 11, 2007. 

ADDRESSES: Send comments on this 

proposal to the Docket Management 

System, U.S. Department of 

Transportation, Room Plaza 401, 400 

Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC 

20590–0001. You must identify FAA 

Docket No. FAA–2007–27850 and 

Airspace Docket No. 07–ASO–05, at the 

beginning of your comments. You may 

also submit comments through the 

Internet at http://dms.dot.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul 

Gallant, Airspace and Rules Group, 

Office of System Operations Airspace 

and AIM, Federal Aviation 

Administration, 800 Independence 

Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591; 

telephone: (202) 267–8783. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Comments Invited 

Interested parties are invited to 

participate in this proposed rulemaking 

by submitting such written data, views, 

or arguments, as they may desire. 

Comments that provide the factual basis 

supporting the views and suggestions 

presented are particularly helpful in 

developing reasoned regulatory 

decisions on the proposal. Comments 

are specifically invited on the overall 

regulatory, aeronautical, economic, 

environmental, and energy-related 

aspects of the proposal. 

Communications should identify both 

docket numbers (FAA Docket No. FAA–

2007–27850 and Airspace Docket No. 

07–ASO–05) and be submitted in 

triplicate to the Docket Management 

System (see ADDRESSES section for 

address and phone number). You may 

also submit comments through the 

Internet at http://dms.dot.gov. 

Commenters wishing the FAA to 

acknowledge receipt of their comments 

on this action must submit with those 

comments a self-addressed, stamped 

postcard on which the following 

statement is made: ‘‘Comments to FAA 

Docket No. FAA–2007–27850 and 

Airspace Docket No. 07-ASO–05.’’ The 

postcard will be date/time stamped and 

returned to the commenter. 

All communications received on or 

before the specified closing date for 

comments will be considered before 

taking action on the proposed rule. The 

proposal contained in this action may 

be changed in light of comments 

received. All comments submitted will 

be available for examination in the 

public docket both before and after the 

closing date for comments. A report 

summarizing each substantive public 

contact with FAA personnel concerned 

with this rulemaking will be filed in the 

docket. 

Availability of NPRM’s 

An electronic copy of this document 

may be downloaded through the 

Internet at http://dms.dot.gov. Recently 

published rulemaking documents can 

also be accessed through the FAA’s Web 

page at http://www.faa.gov or the 

Federal Register’s Web page at http:// 

www.gpoaccess.gov/fr/index.html. 

You may review the public docket 

containing the proposal, any comments 

received, and any final disposition in 

person in the Dockets Office (see 

ADDRESSES section for address and 

phone number) between 9 a.m. and 5 

p.m., Monday through Friday, except 

Federal holidays. An informal docket 

may also be examined during normal 

business hours at the office of the 

Regional Air Traffic Division, Federal 

Aviation Administration, 1601 Lind 

Avenue, #14, SW., Renton, WA 98055. 

Persons interested in being placed on 

a mailing list for future NPRM’s should 

contact the FAA’s Office of Rulemaking, 

(202) 267–9677, for a copy of Advisory 

Circular No. 11–2A, Notice of Proposed 

Rulemaking Distribution System, which 

describes the application procedure. 

Background 

R–3702A and R–3702B were 

established to contain a variety of 

hazardous activities involving both 

ground-based and aircraft weapons 

systems. Currently, R–3702A extends 

from ground level up to and including 

6,000 feet MSL. R–3702B overlies R–

3702A and extends from 6,000 feet MSL 

to Flight Level (FL) 220. A third 

subdivision, restricted area R–3702C, 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSALS
20788 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 80 / Thursday April 26, 2007 / Proposed Rules 

1 7 U.S.C. 1 et seq. (2000). The Act can be 

accessed at http://www.access.gpo.gov/uscode/ 

title7/chapter1_.html. 

2Section 4c of the Act provides the Commission 

with plenary authority over commodity options. 

overlies R–3702A and B, and extends 

from FL 220 to FL 270, but is not 

affected by this proposed action. 

Hazardous training operations 

conducted in these areas only require 

restricted airspace up to 10,000 feet 

MSL. However, under the current 

configuration, R–3702A only extends up 

to 6,000 feet MSL. Therefore, to provide 

protection when hazardous training 

operations are being conducted at 

10,000 feet MSL and below, R–3702B 

must also be activated. This results in 

periods when the airspace between 

11,000 feet MSL and FL 220 is being 

unnecessarily restricted and unavailable 

for transit by nonparticipating aircraft. 

Resetting the altitude boundary between 

R–3702A and R–3702B at 10,000 feet 

MSL instead of 6,000 feet MSL, would 

permit more efficient airspace 

management and allow air traffic 

control (ATC) to provide better service 

to civil aircraft in that area. 

The Proposal 

The FAA is proposing to amend Title 

14 Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) 

part 73 to realign the designated 

altitudes of restricted areas R–3702A 

and R–3702B at Fort Campbell, KY. The 

proposal would change the designated 

altitudes for R–3702A from ‘‘surface to 

6,000 feet MSL,’’ to ‘‘surface to 10,000 

feet MSL.’’ In addition, the designated 

altitudes for R–3702B would be changed 

from ‘‘6,000 feet MSL to FL 220,’’ to 

‘‘10,000 feet MSL to FL 220.’’ The 

proposed change would permit Fort 

Campbell to conduct training that 

involves hazardous operations not 

exceeding 10,000 feet MSL without 

unnecessarily restricting aircraft from 

transiting the area at higher altitudes. 

This change would allow ATC to 

provide better service to 

nonparticipating aircraft in the area. 

Section 73.37 of Title 14 CFR part 73 

was republished in FAA Order 7400.8N, 

dated February 16, 2007. 

The FAA has determined that this 

proposed regulation only involves an 

established body of technical 

regulations for which frequent and 

routine amendments are necessary to 

keep them operationally current. 

Therefore, this proposed regulation: (1) 

Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’

under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not 

a ‘‘significant rule’’ under Department of 

Transportation (DOT) Regulatory 

Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; 

February 26, 1979); and (3) does not 

warrant preparation of a regulatory 

evaluation as the anticipated impact is 

so minimal. Since this is a routine 

matter that will only affect air traffic 

procedures and air navigation, it is 

certified that this proposed rule, when 

promulgated, will not have a significant 

economic impact on a substantial 

number of small entities under the 

criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. 

Environmental Review 

This proposal will be subject to the 

appropriate environmental analysis in 

accordance with FAA Order 1050.1E, 

Environmental Impacts: Policies and 

Procedures, prior to any FAA final 

regulatory action. 

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 73 

Airspace, Navigation (air). 

The Proposed Amendment 

In consideration of the foregoing, the 

Federal Aviation Administration 

proposes to amend 14 CFR part 73 as 

follows: 

PART 73—SPECIAL USE AIRSPACE 

1. The authority citation for part 73 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113, 

40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959–

1963 Comp., p. 389. 

§ 73.37 [Amended] 

2. Section 73.37 is amended as 

follows: 

* * * * * 

R–3702A Fort Campbell, KY 

[Amended] 

Under Designated altitudes, by 

removing the words ‘‘Surface to 6,000 

feet MSL,’’ and inserting the words 

‘‘Surface to 10,000 feet MSL.’’

* * * * * 

R–3702B Fort Campbell, KY 

[Amended] 

Under Designated altitudes, by 

removing the words ‘‘6,000 feet MSL to 

FL 220,’’ and inserting the words 

‘‘10,000 feet MSL to FL 220.’’

* * * * * 

Issued in Washington, DC, April 20, 2007. 

Paul Gallant, 

Acting Manager, Airspace and Rules Group. 

[FR Doc. E7–8020 Filed 4–25–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING 

COMMISSION 

17 CFR Part 3 

RIN 3038–AC37 

Registration of Intermediaries 

AGENCY: Commodity Futures Trading 

Commission. 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: The Commodity Futures 

Trading Commission (‘‘Commission’’ or 

‘‘CFTC’’) is proposing to amend 

Commission Regulation 3.10 to require 

certain registered intermediaries, i.e., 

futures commission merchants 

(‘‘FCMs’’), introducing brokers (‘‘IBs’’), 

commodity pool operators (‘‘CPOs’’), 

commodity trading advisors (‘‘CTAs’’) 

and leverage transaction merchants 

(‘‘LTMs’’), to complete an online annual 

review of their registration information 

maintained with the National Futures 

Association (‘‘NFA’’). The proposed 

amendment (‘‘Proposed Amendment’’) 

would ensure that NFA will have 

accurate and current information about 

such registrants. The Commission’s 

proposal (‘‘Proposal’’) also includes a 

technical and conforming amendment to 

Commission Regulation 3.33(f), which 

regulation is cross-referenced in the 

Proposed Amendment. 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before May 29, 2007. 

ADDRESSES: Comments on the Proposal 

should be sent to Eileen Donovan, 

Acting Secretary, Commodity Futures 

Trading Commission, Three Lafayette 

Centre, 1155 21st Street, NW., 

Washington, DC 20581. Comments may 

be sent by facsimile transmission to 

(202) 418–5521, or by e-mail to 

secretary@cftc.gov. Reference should be 

made to ‘‘Proposal Regarding the 

Registration of Intermediaries.’’

Comments also may be submitted by 

connecting to the Federal eRulemaking 

Portal at http://www.regulations.gov and 

following the comment submission 

instructions. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Helene D. Schroeder, Special Counsel, 

Compliance and Registration Section, 

Division of Clearing and Intermediary 

Oversight, Commodity Futures Trading 

Commission, Three Lafayette Centre, 

1155 21st Street, NW., Washington, DC 

20581, telephone number: (202) 418–

5450; facsimile number: (202) 418–5528; 

and electronic mail: 

hschroeder@cftc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Background 

A. The Regulatory Framework 

Sections 4d, 4f(a)(1), 4m and 4n(1) of 

the Commodity Exchange Act (‘‘Act’’) 1

require the registration of firms seeking 

to act as intermediaries for exchangetraded futures.2 The statutory 

framework for registration procedures is 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSALS