# Patent

## Title
Regulation of osteopontin

## Abstract

The present invention provides methods for the regulation of osteopontin activity in a subject as well as for treating or preventing conditions associated with an increased activity of osteopontin activity in a subject.

## Background
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/894,153, entitled “Regulation of Osteopontin,” filed Mar. 9, 2007, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.


Osteopontin (“OPN”), also known as secreted phosphoprotein 1 (“SPP1”), early T-lymphocyte activation marker (“Eta-1”), sialoprotein I or 44K BPP (bone phosphoprotein), is a glycosylated phosphoprotein found in plasma, other bodily fluids, and extracellular matrices. The protein is composed of approximately 300 amino acids residues and has about 30 carbohydrate residues, including 10 sialic acid residues, attached to it. OPN is an acidic protein which exhibits a high amino acid homology between species (e.g., mouse, rat, human and pig) with several conserved elements including a stretch of 7 to 9 Asp or Glu residues.
Osteopontin is biosynthesized by a variety of tissue types including preosteoblasts, osteoblasts, osteocytes, extraosseous cells in the inner ear, brain, kidney, deciduum, placenta, odontoblasts, some bone marrow cells, hypertrophic chondrocytes, macrophages, smooth muscle, and endothelial cells. In the bone, the protein is primarily made by cells of the osteoblastic lineage and deposited on mineralized matrix. It is abundant in bone mineral matrix and accelerates bone regeneration and remodeling. Osteopontin is a multifunctional protein with an ability to bind several proteins, including integrin proteins and variants of the protein CD44.
Osteopontin is associated with, and plays a role in, the regulation and progression of many diseases. Osteopontin is known to be increased in a number of autoimmune disorders and is overexpressed in a variety of cancers. Plasma levels of osteopontin are also elevated in individuals with coronary artery disease and elevated levels of osteopontin are found in the synovial fluid of individuals with rheumatoid arthritis.
Modulation of osteopontin may, therefore, confer significant therapeutic benefits. Accordingly, there is a need to identify means to regulate osteopontin, especially means to lower the effective osteopontin level or concentration.
The present invention is based, at least in part, on the discovery that osteopontin can be regulated by regulating S-adenosyl methionine decarboxylase (AMD1), polyamine biosynthesis, adenosine or a pathway containing either AMD1 or adenosine. Accordingly, the present invention provides methods for the regulation of osteopontin activity in a subject as well as for treating or preventing conditions associated with an increased activity of osteopontin activity in a subject.
The present invention provides a method of decreasing the activity of osteopontin in a cell. The method comprises contacting a cell with an effective amount of an agent that inhibits S-adenosyl methionine decarboxylase (“AMD1”), inhibits polyamine biosynthesis, or increases adenosine in the cell.
According to another aspect, the present invention provides a method of decreasing the activity of osteopontin in a cell by contacting the cell with an effective amount of MGBG, a salt of MGBG, or a protected derivative of MGBG.
According to another aspect, the present invention provides a method of treating or preventing a condition associated with an increased activity of osteopontin. The method comprises administering to a subject in need of such treatment an effective amount of an agent that inhibits S-adenosyl methionine decarboxylase, inhibits polyamine biosynthesis, or increases adenosine in the subject, with the proviso that the agent is not MGBG, a polyamine analog or a salt or protected derivative thereof.
According to yet another aspect, the present invention provides a method of treating a condition. The method comprises administering to a subject in need of such treatment an effective amount of MGBG, a salt of MGBG, a protected derivative of MGBG, or a polyamine analog, a salt, a protected derivative, or a stereoisomer thereof, wherein the condition is selected from the group consisting of Crohn's disease, Parkinson's disease, inflammatory bowel disorder, multiple sclerosis (MS), amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), hepatitis, HBV, HCV, nephritis, cerebritis, glomerulonephritis, rheumatoid arthritis, type 2 diabetes, cardiac fibrosis and angiotensin type II associated hypertension, osteoporosis, a mast cell produced IgE mediated hypersensitivity immune reaction, peripheral sensory neuropathy associated with HIV infection or diabetes mellitus, asthma, autism, dermatomyositis, frailty, obesity, primary biliary cirrhosis, primary sclerosing cholangitis, post-radiation syndrome, psoriatic arthritis, sarcoidosis, scleroderma with or without pulmonary fibrosis, a kidney related autoimmune condition, diabetic nephropathy, a diabetic vascular complication, and a lymphoproliferation related autoimmune condition.
According to yet another aspect, the present invention provides a method of decreasing osteopontin secretion from monocytes or macrophages. The method comprises contacting a monocyte or macrophage with an effective amount of an agent that inhibits S-adenosyl methionine decarboxylase, inhibits polyamine biosynthesis, or increases adenosine in the monocyte or macrophage.
According to yet another aspect, the present invention provides a method of decreasing osteopontin secretion from monocytes or macrophages. The method comprises contacting a monocyte or macrophage with an effective amount of an agent that inhibits S-adenosyl methionine decarboxylase, inhibits polyamine biosynthesis, or increases adenosine in the monocyte or macrophage.
According to yet another aspect, the present invention provides a method of decreasing differentiation of macrophages from monocytes. The method comprises contacting a monocyte with an effective amount of an agent that inhibits S-adenosyl methionine decarboxylase, inhibits polyamine biosynthesis, or increases adenosine in the monocyte.
These and other features of the present invention are set forth below.



BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
The skilled artisan will understand that the drawings are for illustration purposes only. The drawings are not intended to limit the scope of the present invention in any way.
FIG. 1 shows the structures of MGBG, SL47 (also referred to as SL11047) and SL 93 (also referred to as SL11093).
FIGS. 2A-2D depict the changes in cell counts and RNA signals of OPN, ADA and other genes induced by MGBG in mononuclear cells separated on the basis of cell-surface CD14 and CD16 expression.
FIG. 3 depicts the average OPN levels in CCS of breast cancer and normal PBMCs treated with MGBG.
FIG. 4 depicts the average OPN levels in CCS of AD and normal PBMCs treated with MGBG.
FIG. 5 depicts the average OPN levels in CCS of HIV and normal PBMCs treated with MGBG.
FIG. 6 depicts the average OPN levels in CCS of ALS and normal PBMCs treated with MGBG.
FIG. 7 depicts the average OPN levels in CCS of AIDS dementia and normal PBMCs treated with MGBG.
FIG. 8 shows that rOPN increases CD14+/CD16+ cell population.
FIG. 9 shows the results with, and without MGBG (PA001) treatment in infected macaques on macrophages in CNS.
FIG. 10 shows the OPN levels in brains of SIV-infected animals with, and without, MGBG treatment.
FIG. 11 shows the OPN levels in lymph nodes of SIV-infected animals with, and without, MGBG treatment. Samples B146 and CB18 were treated with MGBG, whereas BT66 was not.
FIG. 12 shows the effect of MGBG on Osteopontin RNA in PBMC cultures.
FIG. 13 shows the effect of MGBG on Osteopontin Protein Production in PBMC cultures.



The present invention is based, at least in part, on the discovery that osteopontin can be regulated by regulating S-adenosyl methionine decarboxylase (“AMD1”), polyamine biosynthesis, adenosine or a pathway containing either AMD1 or adenosine. Accordingly, the present invention provides methods for the regulation of osteopontin activity in a subject as well as for treating or preventing conditions associated with an increased activity of osteopontin activity in a subject.
According to one aspect, the present invention provides a method of decreasing the activity of osteopontin in a cell. The term “osteopontin” is used interchangeably with “OPN,” “SPP1,” “Eta-1,” sialoprotein I or 44K BPP (bone phosphoprotein). In general, osteopontin refers to any full-length or partial fragment of a full-length osteopontin. Osteopontin can also refer to any modified, e.g., glycosylated, osteopontin.
The term “activity” as used herein refers to both, the biological activity of the polypeptide and to the quantity or level of osteopontin present in the cell. In one embodiment, the term activity refers to the quantity of osteopontin, e.g., present, expressed or produced in the cell. In another embodiment, it refers to the level of osteopontin secreted by the cell, for example, by a mononuclear cell.
According to another aspect, the present invention provides a method of treating or preventing a condition associated with an increased activity of osteopontin. The method comprises administering to a subject in need of such treatment an effective amount of an agent that regulates the activity of osteopontin. The condition can be any condition now known, or later discovered, to be associated with an increased activity of osteopontin. Examples of conditions associated with an increased activity of osteopontin include, but are not limited to, autoimmune diseases, inflammatory diseases, neoplastic growth and tumor metastases. In one embodiment, the condition associated with an increased activity of osteopontin is infiltration of immune cells to an affected area or increased level of CD14/CD16 macrophages in a subject.
In another embodiment, conditions associated with an increased activity of osteopontin include, but are not limited to, multiple sclerosis (MS), atherosclerosis and related coronary diseases, rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, nephritis, cerebritis, Crohn's disease, osteoporosis, inflammatory bowel disorder, breast cancer, ovarian cancer, pancreatic cancer, bladder cancer, lung cancer, colon cancer, gastric carcinomas, esophageal carcinomas, squamous cell carcinomas of the head or neck, prostate cancer, thyroid cancer, melanoma, kidney cancers, renal cell carcinomas, endometrial cancer, small intestine cancer, duodenal cancer, cholangiocarcinoma, astrocytoma, AIDS lymphoma, follicular lymphoma, T-cell lymphoma, B-cell lymphoma, proliferative retinopathy, vitreoretinopathy, diabetic retinopathy, macular degeneration, non-HIV dementia, HIV- and AIDS-associated dementia, focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, membrane proliferative glomerulonephropathy, psoriasis, herpes virus associated disease, Castleman's disease, Kaposi's sarcoma, Alzheimer's disease, type 2 diabetes, cardiac fibrosis and angiotensin type II associated hypertension, mast cell produced IgE mediated hypersensitivity immune reactions, prelymphomatic or lymphoproliferation related autoimmune conditions, angioimmunoblastic lymphadenophathy (AILD), glomerulonephritis and other glomerular diseases, immunoglobulin A (IgA) nephropathy, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS), hepatitis including HBV and HCV, peripheral sensory neuropathy associated with HIV infection or diabetes mellitus, asthma, autism, dermatomyositis, frailty, obesity, Parkinson's disease, primary biliary cirrhosis, primary sclerosing cholangitis, post-radiation syndrome, psoriatic arthritis, sarcoidosis, scleroderma with or without pulmonary fibrosis, kidney related autoimmune conditions, diabetic nephropathy and other diabetic vascular complications.
In yet another embodiment, the condition associated with an increased activity of osteopontin is not associated with macrophage proliferation.
A “subject” may be any animal suffering from a condition associated with an increased activity of osteopontin that is treatable in accordance with the methods of the invention. An animal is a living multicellular vertebrate organism, and includes both human and non-human mammals.
An “effective amount” or a “therapeutically effective amount” is a quantity of a compound (e.g., MGBG, a polyamine analog or any agent) that is sufficient to achieve a desired effect in a subject being treated. For instance, this can be the amount necessary to reduce osteopontin activity or to otherwise measurably alter or alleviate the symptoms of increased osteopontin activity. The effective amount of a compound of the present invention may vary depending upon the route of administration and dosage form. In addition, specific dosages may be adjusted depending on conditions of disease, the age, body weight, general health conditions, sex, and diet of the subject, dose intervals, administration routes, excretion rate, and combinations of agents.
According to yet another aspect, the present invention provides a method of decreasing osteopontin secretion from monocytes or macrophages. The method comprises contacting a monocyte or macrophage with an effective amount of an agent that regulates the activity of osteopontin.
According to yet another aspect, the present invention provides a method of decreasing differentiation of macrophages from monocytes. The method comprises contacting a monocyte with an effective amount of an agent that regulates the activity of osteopontin.
The agent useful in the methods of the invention can be any agent that decreases the activity of osteopontin. In one embodiment, the agent is capable of inhibiting S-adenosyl methionine decarboxylase (“AMD1”) or any pathway containing AMD1, e.g., any entity upstream or downstream of a pathway containing AMD1, especially any pathway containing AMD1 and associated with adenosine production. In another embodiment the agent is capable of inhibiting polyamine biosynthesis or any pathway involved in polyamine biosynthesis.
Alternatively the agent is capable of increasing the activity of adenosine in the cell, either directly, or via a pathway containing adenosine. In general, a pathway containing AMD1 or adenosine is understood to refer to a pathway in which either AMD1 or adenosine is involved, including, for example, as a substrate, catalyst, product or by-product.
The agent can be any kind of known or later discovered agent that can inhibit the activity of the enzyme S-adenosyl methionine decarboxylase, can inhibit polyamine biosynthesis, or that can increase the activity of adenosine in, for example, a cell. In one embodiment, the agent is a chemical agent, including, but not limited to, organic molecules and salts, protected derivatives and stereoisomers thereof, inorganic molecules or various ionic or elemental entities. In another embodiment, the agent is a biological agent or a biomolecule, for example, a polypeptide, an antibody or an active fragment thereof, or a nucleic acid molecule, e.g., RNAi.
According to one embodiment of the present invention, the agent is a polyamine analog or a salt, a protected derivative, or a stereoisomer thereof. Any polyamine analog is suitable for use in the methods of the present invention. Exemplary polyamine analogs used in the methods of the invention include compounds of the structures 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, and the corresponding stereoisomers, salts, and protected derivatives thereof:




    where R1, R2, R4, R6 and R7 are independently selected from the group consisting of hydrogen, alkyl and aryl, and where R3 and R5 are alkyl groups;






    where R1, R2, R4, R6, R8, and R9 are independently selected from the group consisting of hydrogen, alkyl and aryl and where R3, R5 and R7 are alkyl groups;






    where R1, R2, R4, R6, R10 and R11 are independently selected from the group consisting of hydrogen, alkyl and aryl, and where R3, R5, R7 and R9 are alkyl groups;






    where R1 and R5 are independently selected from the group consisting of methyl, ethyl, n-propyl, and isopropyl;
    where R2, R3, and R4 are independently selected from the group consisting of C1-C6 alkyl, C2-C6 alkenyl, C3-C6 cycloalkyl, C1-C6 alkyl-C3-C6 cycloalkyl-C1-C6 alkyl, C3-C10 aryl, and C1-C6 alkyl-C3-C10 aryl-C1-C6 alkyl;
    and where R6, R7, R8 and R9 are independently selected from the group consisting of H, methyl, and ethyl;






    where R1 and R6 are independently selected from the group consisting of methyl, ethyl, n-propyl, and isopropyl;
    R2, R3, R4 and R5 are independently selected from the group consisting of C1-C6 alkyl, C2-C6 alkenyl, C3-C6 cycloalkyl, C1-C6 alkyl-C3-C6 cycloalkyl-C1-C6 alkyl, C3-C10 aryl, and C1-C6 aryl-C1-C6 alkyl;
    and where R7, R8, R9, R10 and R11 are independently selected from the group consisting of H, methyl, and ethyl.


In another embodiment, the polyamine analogs are compounds of the structures 2 and 3, where R3, R5, R7 and R9 are independently (CH2)x groups, where x is an integer from 2 to 6, and further where R4, R6 and R8 are hydrogen atoms.
In yet another embodiment, the polyamine analogs are compounds of the structures 2 and 3, where R3, R5, R7 and R9 are independently (CH2)x groups, where x is an integer from 2 to 6, and where R4, R6 and R8 are hydrogen atoms, and where R1 and R10 are alkyl groups, and further where R2 and R11 are hydrogen atoms.
In yet another embodiment, the polyamine analogs are compounds of the structures 2 and 3, where R3, R5, R7 and R9 are independently (CH2)x groups, where x is an integer from 2 to 6, and where R4, R6 and R8 are hydrogen atoms, and where R1 and R10 are alkyl groups, and where R2 and R11 are hydrogen atoms, and further where the polyamine analogs have a molecular weight less than 500.
Further embodiments of compounds of the structure 4 include those where R6, R7, R8 and R9 are H;

    where R1 and R5 are ethyl;
    where R6, R7, R8 and R9 are H and R1 and R5 are ethyl;
    and/or where R2 and R4 are independently selected from the group consisting of C1-C6 alkyl and R3 is selected from the group consisting of C1-C6 alkyl, C2-C6 alkenyl, C3-C6 cycloalkyl, C1-C6 alkyl-C3-C6 cycloalkyl-C1-C6 alkyl, C3-C10 aryl, and C1-C6 alkyl-C3-C10 aryl-C1-C6 alkyl.


Additional polyamine analogs useful in the present invention include compounds of the formula 6, and the corresponding stereoisomers, salts, and protected derivatives thereof:




    where R4 is C2-C6 n-alkenyl, C3-C6 cycloalkyl, C3-C6 cycloalkenyl, or C3-C6 aryl;
    R3 and R5 are independently chosen from a single bond, C1-C6 alkyl, or C1-C6 alkenyl;
    R2 and R6 are independently chosen from C1-C6 alkyl, C1-C6 alkenyl, C3-C6 cycloalkyl, C3-C6 cycloalkenyl, or C3-C6 aryl;
    R1 and R7 are independently chosen from H, C1-C6 alkyl, or C2-C6 alkenyl; and
    R8, R9, R10, and R11 are H.


In certain embodiments of the compounds of formula 6, R1 and R7 are independently chosen from C1-C6 alkyl or C2-C6 alkenyl.
Additional polyamine analogs useful in the present invention include compounds of the formula 7, and the corresponding stereoisomers, salts, and protected derivatives thereof:




    where R4 is C1-C6 n-alkyl or C1-C6 branched alkyl;
    R3 and R5 are independently chosen from a single bond or C1-C6 alkyl;
    R2 and R6 are independently chosen from C1-C6 alkyl, C1-C6 alkenyl, C3-C6 cycloalkyl, C3-C6 cycloalkenyl, or C3-C6 aryl;
    R1 and R7 are independently chosen from H, C1-C6 alkyl, or C2-C6 alkenyl; and
    R8, R9, R10, and R11 are H.


In certain embodiments of the compounds of formula 7, R2 and R7 are independently chosen from C1-C6 alkyl or C2-C6 alkenyl, R4 is C1-C6 saturated n-alkyl or C1-C6 saturated branched alkyl, and R3 and R5 are independently chosen from a single bond or C1-C6 saturated n-alkyl.
As used herein, a “polyamine” is any of a group of aliphatic, straight-chain amines derived biosynthetically from amino acids; polyamines are reviewed in Marton et al. (1995) Ann. Rev. Pharm. Toxicol. 35:55-91. By “polyamine” is generally meant a naturally-occurring polyamine or a polyamine which is naturally produced in eukaryotic cells. Examples of polyamines include putrescine, spermidine, spermine and cadaverine.
As used herein, a “polyamine analog” is an organic cation structurally similar but non-identical to naturally-occurring polyamines such as spermine and/or spermidine and their precursor, diamine putrescine. Polyamine analogs can be branched or un-branched, or incorporate cyclic moieties. Polyamines may comprise primary, secondary, tertiary, or quaternary amino groups. In one embodiment, all the nitrogen atoms of the polyamine analogs are independently secondary, tertiary, or quaternary amino groups, but are not so limited. Polyamine analogs may include imine, amidine and guanidine groups in place of amine groups. The term “polyamine analog” includes stereoisomers, salts and protected derivatives of polyamine analogs.
A “stereoisomer” is any optical isomer of a compound, including enantiomers and diastereomers. Unless otherwise indicated, structural formulae of compounds are intended to embrace all possible stereoisomers.
A “salt” or “pharmaceutically acceptable salt” is a compound formed by the replacement of one or more hydrogen atoms with elements or groups, which is composed of anions and cations, which usually ionizes in water; a salt is formed, for instance, by neutralization of an acid by a base. Examples of salts include, but are not limited to, halide, for example, chloride, bromide, or iodide, nitrate, sulfate, bisulfate, phosphate, acid phosphate, isonicotinate, acetate, lactate, salicylate, citrate, tartrate, pantothenate, bitartrate, ascorbate, succinate, maleate, gentisinate, fumarate, gluconate, glucaronate, saccharate, formate, benzoate, glutamate, methanesulfonate, ethanesulfonate, benzensulfonate, p-toluenesulfonate and pamoate (i.e., 1,1′-methylene-bis-(2-hydroxy-3-naphthoate)) salts.
“Protected derivative” is used to refer to a compound protected with a protecting group. “Protecting group” refers to a chemical group that exhibits the following characteristics: 1) reacts selectively with the desired functionality in good yield (preferably at least 80%, more preferably at least 90%, more preferably at least 95%, still more preferably at least 99%) to give a protected substrate that is stable to the projected reactions for which protection is desired; 2) is selectively removable from the protected substrate to yield the desired functionality; and 3) is removable in good yield (preferably at least 80%, more preferably at least 90%, more preferably at least 95%, still more preferably at least 99%) by reagents compatible with the other functional group(s) present or generated in such projected reactions. Examples of suitable protecting groups can be found in Greene et al. (1991) Protective Groups in Organic Synthesis, 2nd Ed. (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York). Exemplary protecting groups for the amino functionality include, but are not limited to, mesitylenesulfonyl (MesSO2), benzyloxycarbonyl (CBz), t-butyloxycarbonyl (Boc), t-butyldimethylsilyl (TBDIMS), 9-fluorenylmethyloxycarbonyl (Fmoc), or suitable photolabile protecting groups such as 6-nitroveratryloxy carbonyl (Nvoc).
An “alkyl” is a cyclic, branched, or straight chain chemical group containing carbon and hydrogen, such as methyl, butyl, t-butyl, pentyl, cyclopropyl, and octyl. Alkyl groups can be either unsubstituted or substituted with one or more substituents, e.g., halogen, alkoxy, acyloxy, amino, hydroxyl, mercapto, carboxy, benzyl. Alkyl groups can be saturated or unsaturated (e.g., containing —C═C— or —C≡C— subunits), at one or several positions. Unless otherwise specified, alkyl groups will comprise 1 to 8 carbon atoms, but may include 1 to 6, or even 1 to 4 carbon atoms. “Cycloalkyl” refers to cyclic alkyl groups only, such as cyclopropyl, cyclobutyl, cyclopentyl, etc. “n-alkyl” refers to a linear (i.e., straight-chain) alkyl group only, while “branched alkyl” refers to branched alkyl groups to the exclusion of cyclic and linear alkyl groups. “Alkenyl” refers to a cyclic, branched, or straight chain chemical group containing carbon and hydrogen where at least one bond is monounsaturated, such as ethenyl, cyclopentenyl, or 1,3-butadienyl. Alkenyl groups can be substituted as indicated for alkyl groups. Alkenyl groups can be designated as cyclic, linear (n-alkenyl) or branched in an analogous fashion to the preceding designations for alkyl. An “aryl” is an unsaturated aromatic carbocyclic group having a single ring (e.g., phenyl), or multiple condensed rings (e.g., naphthyl), which can optionally be unsubstituted or substituted with amino, hydroxyl, alkyl, alkoxy, chloro, halo, mercapto and other substituents.
According to another embodiment of the present invention, the agent is a chemical moiety that inhibits the activity of S-adenosyl methionine decarboxylase, inhibits polyamine biosynthesis, and/or increases the activity of adenosine. Examples of such moieties include, but are not limited to, those listed in Table 1. Irrespective of the form of the moiety listed in Table 1, it is understood that it includes, as applicable, a salt, protected derivative, and stereoisomer thereof.







TABLE 1







Exemplary Inhibitors of S-adenosyl methionine decarboxylase


and/or polyamine biosynthesis











Pub Chem


Compound
Official Name (Not IUPAC)
ID












Decarboxylated SAM
s-adenosyl-3-methylthiopropylamine



Mitoguazone or “MGBG”
Methylglyoxal bis(guanyl-hydrazone)
5351154


EGBG
Ethylglyoxal bis(guanylhydrazone)
9561662


Berenil
Diminazene or Diminazene aceturate
2354


Pentamidine
4-[5-(4-carbamimidoylphenoxy)
4735



pentoxy]benzenecarboximidamide



5′-(Dimethylsulphino)-5′-deoxyadenosine



S-adneosyl-4-methylthiobutyrate



S-adenosyl-S-methyl-L-cysteine


AMA
S-(5′-Deoxy-5′-adenosyl) methylthioethylhydroxylamine


EMGBG
Ethylmethylglyoxal bis(guanylhydrazone)
9574151


DEGBG
Diethylglyoxal bis(guanylhydrazone)
5479208


CGP-33′829
6-((2-carbamimidoylhydrazono)methyl)picolinimidamide


CGP-36′958


CGP-39′937
2,2′-bipyridine-6,6′-bis(carboximidamide)


CGP-48664 or CGP-
4-amidinoindan-1-one 2′-amidinohydrazone
5486811


48664A or SAM 364A


AbeAdo or MDL-73811
5′-[[(Z)-4-amino-2-butenyl] methylamino]-5′-deoxyadenosine
6436013


MAOEA
5′-deoxy-5′-[N-methyl-N-[2-(aminooxy)ethyl]amino]adenosine
3081018


MHZPA
5′-deoxy-5′-[N-methyl-N-(3-hydrazinopropyl)amino]adenosine
122092


MHZEA
5′-deoxy-5′-[(2-hydrazinoethyl)-methylamino]adenosine


AdoMac
S-(5′-deoxy-5′-adenosyl)-1-ammonio-4-(methylsulfonio)-2-
3083364



cyclopentene


AdoMao
S-(5′-deoxy-5′-adenosyl)-1-aminoxy-4-(methylsulfonio)-2-cyclopentene


APA
1-Aminooxy-3-aminopropane
65020


AOE-PU
N-[2-aminooxyethyl]-1,4-diaminobutane


AP-APA
1-aminooxy-3-N-[3-aminopropyl]-aminopropane



1,11-bis(ethyl)norspermine


BES
1,8-bis(ethyl)spermidine


BES
1,12-bis(ethyl)spermine


DESPM
N1,N12-diethylspermine


BE-3-3-3
1,11-bis(ethylarnino)-4,8-diazaundecan


BE-4-4-4
1,14-bis(ethylamino)-5,10-diazatetradecane


DEHOP or DEHSPM
Diethylhomospermine, N1,N14-diethylhomospermine


DENOP
diethyl-norspermine


BE-4-4-4-4
1,19-bis(ethylamino)-5,10,15-triaza-nonadecane


SL11037
N-ethyl-N′-(2-(3′-ethylamino-propylamino methyl)-cis-



cyclopropylmethyl)-propane 1,3-diamine tetrahydrochloride


SL11038
N-ethyl-N′-(2-(3′-ethylamino-propylamino methyl)-trans-



cyclobutylmethyl)-propane 1,3-diamine tetrahydrochoride


SL11044
N-ethyl-N′-(2-(3′-ethylamino-propylamino methyl)-trans-



cyclopropylmethyl)-propane 1,3-diamine tetrahydrochloride


SL11047 or SL47
N,N′-bis(3-ethylaminopropyl)-cis-but-2-ene-1,4-diamine



tetrahydrochloride


SL11093 or SL93
N,N′-(cyclopropane-1,2-diylbis(methylene))bis(N4-ethylbutane-



1,4-diamine)









In yet another embodiment, the agent is a compound selected from the group consisting of MGBG, MDL73811, CGP48664, Berenil, Pentamidine, SL47, and SL93, or a combination of two or more thereof. In yet another embodiment, the agent is MGBG, SL47 or SL93. Structures for MGBG, SL47 and SL93 are shown in FIG. 1. In still another embodiment, two or more agents are used in the methods of the invention to regulate the activity of osteopontin. The two or more agents can be used either sequentially or simultaneously.
In one embodiment, the agent is a compound selected from the list of agents listed in Table 1, with the proviso that the agent is not MGBG. In another embodiment, the agent is not a polyamine analog. In yet another embodiment, the agent is not MGBG or a polyamine analog. In yet another embodiment, the agent is not a polyamine biosynthesis inhibitor. In yet another embodiment, the agent is a compound selected from the group consisting of MDL73811, CGP48664, Berenil and Pentamidine.
“MGBG” is 1,1′[methylethanediylidene]dinitrilodiguanidine and is also known as methylglyoxal bis(guanylhydrazone), methyl-GAG, and mitoguazone. As used herein, MGBG includes the free base and salts thereof. It is commonly, but not necessarily, used as a dihydrochloride.
The agent may also be administered in combination with one or more entities. In one embodiment, the entity is a therapeutic entity, including, but not limited to, a steroid or other anti-inflammatory agent. In another embodiment, the entity is a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier.
The effective amount of an agent that inhibits S-adenosyl methionine decarboxylase or increases the activity of adenosine, e.g., in a cell or a subject, can be any amount that is sufficient to decrease the activity of osteopontin, e.g., in the cell or the subject, typically by about 25%, 30%, 40%, 50%, 60%, 70%, 75%, 80%, 85%, 90%, 95% or more. In one embodiment, the effective amount of an agent is an amount that is sufficient to decrease the activity of osteopontin by 70% or more. In another embodiment, the effective amount of an agent is an amount that is sufficient to decrease the activity of osteopontin by 80% or more. In yet another embodiment, the agent inhibits S-adenosyl methionine decarboxylase and the effective amount is an amount sufficient to activate adenosine deaminase (“ADA”). In still another embodiment, the agent inhibits S-adenosyl methionine decarboxylase and the effective amount is an amount sufficient to increase the activity of adenosine.
The optimal dose, frequency of administration, and duration of treatment with the agent that decreases the activity of osteopontin in a subject may vary from subject to subject, depending on the subject's condition, the subject's age, weight, response to the treatment, and the nature of the therapeutic entity. The optimal dose and duration of treatment may be best determined by monitoring the subject's response during the course of the treatment. In some instances, the administration of higher doses may permit less frequent administration, and lower doses may require more frequent administration in order to achieve a clinically significant improvement in the subject's condition. The agent may be administered as a single dose or in multiple doses.
Generally, a therapeutically effective dose of the agent in accordance with the present methods will be one or more doses of from about 10 to about 1100 mg/m2. Lower dose regiments include doses of 10-200, 10-100, 10-50 and 20-200 mg/m2. Higher dose regimens include 200-400, 250-500, 400-600, 500-800 600-1000 and 800-1100 mg/m2. In one embodiment, the dose regimens range from 200-400 mg/m2. In another embodiment, the dose regimens range from 250-500 mg/m2. In yet another embodiment, the dose regimens range from 600-1000 mg/m2. In some embodiments the agent is administered daily, once per week, once every other week, or once per month. In one embodiment, a dose regimen ranging from 200-400 mg/m2 is administered once a week. In another embodiment, a dose regimen ranging from 250-500 mg/m2 is administered once every other week.
The doses may be constant over the entire treatment period, or they may increase or decrease during the course of the treatment. In one embodiment, the agent is administered once a week and starts with the administration of 200 mg/m2 and increases to 300 mg/m2 and 400 mg/m2 in the second and third weeks, respectively. In another embodiment, the agent is administered once every other week and is kept constant for the entire duration of treatment with the administration of 250 mg/m2. The doses of the agent may be administered for at least one week, at least two weeks, at least three weeks, at least four weeks, at least 6 weeks, or even at least 8 weeks. Adjusting the dose of the agent within these ranges for a particular subject is well within the skill of the ordinary clinician.
The agent may be administered via any conventional route normally used to administer a medicament including, but not limited to, intravenous routes, parenteral routes (e.g., intradermal, intramuscular or subcutaneous routes), oral routes and nasal routes. The agent may be administered as a pharmaceutical composition in a variety of forms including, but not limited to, liquid, powder, suspensions, tablets, pills, capsules, sprays and aerosols. The pharmaceutical compositions may include various pharmaceutically acceptable additives including, but not limited to, carriers, excipients, binders, stabilizers, antimicrobial agents, antioxidants, diluents and/or supports. Examples of suitable excipients and carriers are described, for example, in “Remington's Pharmaceutical Sciences,” Mack Pub. Co., New Jersey (1991). In some embodiments, the agent may be administered via an IV infusion in an aqueous sugar solution. The agent may also be associated with another substance that facilitates agent delivery. For example, the agent may be associated into liposomes. The liposomes, in turn, may be conjugated with targeting substance(s), such as IgGFc receptors.
Exemplary embodiments of the present methods are provided in the following examples. The following examples are presented to illustrate the methods of the invention and to assist one of ordinary skill in using the same. The examples are not intended in any way to otherwise limit the scope of the invention.
EXAMPLES
Example 1
Microarray Analysis of Gene Expression Changes Induced by MGBG
Blood samples were obtained from HIV infected patients (N=9) with positive viral load and reduced CD4 counts, and non-HIV infected, healthy controls (N=6). Blood was collected into heparin anticoagulant tubes and mononuclear cells were isolated by Percoll gradient centrifugation. The cells from each sample were split into 2: one-half receives MGBG at concentration of 10 μM and the other half received no treatment. All samples were then cultured overnight in RPMI media with 10% fetal bovine serum at 37° C. under non-adherent conditions. The next day cells were collected by centrifugation, washed one time with PBS, and lysed by resuspension in TRIZOL, and total RNA was prepared according to manufacturer's instructions (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, Calif.). The quality of the RNA was checked by visualizing rRNA bands using a 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, see Table 2 for ratio of 28 to 18 S rRNA). The RNA was then amplified for microarray analysis using a 2 cycle amplification protocol according to the manufacturer's instructions (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, Calif.). The amplified RNAs were then hybridized to Human Genome U133 plus 2.0 microarrays (Affymetrix) and expression data was obtained using an Affymetrix scanner and GCOS protocols. Microarray data was analyzed with GeneSpring Microarray Suite. Results were normalized using a set of 100 probe sets determined by the manufacturer to have relatively invariant expression across most cell types. The clinical parameters of the samples employed, the RNA quality analysis (ratio of 28 to 18 S rRNA peaks) and the number of the 54,675 probes called present are presented in Table 2.







TABLE 2







Clinical and RNA sample characteristics
















CD14








%
HLA-
CD4/
Viral
% Reduction
rRNA
% Present


















Sample
Type
CD14/16
DR
μl
Load
14/16
14
−
+
−
+





















H5-1293
HIV
68%
1390




1.5
1.7
46.5%
46.7%


H5-1294
HIV
62%
935
12
46.4


1.0
1.9
40.0%
46.8%


H5-1327
HIV
35%
805
43
712
<0%
<0%
1.3
1.3
42.9%
45.3%


H5-1333
HIV
53%
861
567
13.6
71%
58%
1.7
1.6
46.6%
47.2%


H6-004
HIV
55%
1161
567
13.6
26%
26%
0.1
0.1
41.2%
43.5%


H6-017
HIV
38%
882
240
31.0

21%
0.1
0.2
44.2%
43.6%


H6-071
HIV
54%
615
11
>500


1.5
1.4
42.5%
41.4%


H6-144
HIV
38%
557
54
43.0
53%
53%
1.2
1.0
40.3%
37.3%


H6-145
HIV
18%
438
567
13.0
91%
76%
1.3
1.5
46.5%
47.8%


Average

46.8%  
849
258
124.7
60.3%  
46.8%  
1.1
1.2
43.4%
44.4%


C6-019
Healthy

469




1.4
1.2
43.3%
41.6%


C6-139
Healthy
41%
1105


54%
26%
1.8
1.8
48.0%
46.6%


C6-146
Healthy
73%
1950


61%
31%
1.7
1.5
47.5%
48.2%


C6-186
Healthy
30%
634




1.8
1.8
49.6%
47.9%


C6-187
Healthy
19%
667




1.8
1.7
48.8%
45.7%


M6-177
ALS
23%
496




1.7
1.8
47.2%
45.0%


Average

37.2%  
887


57.5%  
28.5%  
1.7
1.6
47.4%
45.8%





Blank cells indicate no data was available.


Viral load values are in thousands per milliliter of plasma.


% reduction indicates decrease in yield of CD14+ or CD14/16++ cells in the presence of 10 μM MGBG as determined on the 5th day of culture.


Number of cells in presence and absence of drug was quantitated by flow cytometry.


rRNA indicates the ratio of the 28 to 18S rRNA peak as determined by the 2100 Bioanalyzer from each sample in the in the absence (−) and presence of MGBG (+).


Note 1.8 to 2.0 is considered a perfect ratio.


% Present indicates number of probes called present by GCOS from each sample in the absence (−) and presence of MGBG (+)






Using the average signals obtained from the MGBG and untreated samples, 489 probes are down-regulated at least 1.5 fold and 382 probes are up-regulated at least 1.5 fold. Not all of these probes were consistently changed (e.g. always up regulated or down regulated). For example results obtained with a Probe set specific to TNFα are presented in Table 2. Although the average change in the presence of MGBG for the TNFα Probe set was 8.7 fold up-regulated, inspection of the results of individual samples shows that 2 out of 6 controls and 6 out of 9 HIV infected individuals were less than 2 fold changed in the presence of MGBG relative to incubation without drug (Tables 3A and 3B). Similarly, although the average change in IL10 signal in the presence of MGBG was 5.6 fold upregulated, inspection of the individual samples revealed that increased signals in the presence of MGBG primarily occurred in HIV infected samples but not controls (Tables 4A and 4B).







TABLE 3A







Results obtained with probe for TNFα. Probe ID = 207113_s_at











samples not significantly changed in the presence of MGBG are shaded













TABLE 3B







Results obtained with probe for TNFα. Probe ID = 207113_s_at











samples not significantly changed in the presence of MGBG are shaded













TABLE 4A







Results obtained with probe for IL10, Probe ID = 207433_at











samples not significantly changed in the presence of MGBG are shaded













TABLE 4B







Results obtained with probe for IL10, Probe ID = 207433_at











samples not significantly changed in the presence of MGBG are shaded






Of all the genes that had changes in their average signals in the presence of MGBG, six genes were selected for further analysis. Four of the genes were downregulated in the presence of MGBG and these included Fc gamma receptor I A (FCGR1a or the high affinity IgG receptor or CD64), leukocyte immunoglobulin-like receptor, subfamily A (with TM domain), member 1 (LILRA1 also designated LIR6 or CD85 I), osteopontin (or secreted phosphoprotein 1 or SPP1), and secretogranin V or secretory granule neuroendocrine protein 1 (SGNE1). Two of the proteins had increased signals in the presence of MGBG and these included adenosine deaminase (ADA) and interleukin 24 (IL24). The signals obtained in the microarray experiments with these six genes are presented in Table 5. The calculated fold change obtained in each sample is presented in Table 6. FCGR1A and LILRA1 are down-regulated more than 2 fold by MGBG in 6 of 9 and 5 of 9 HIV samples, respectively, but not in control samples which had much more variable changes than HIV infected individuals. SPP1 and SGNE1 exhibit 2 fold or greater reductions in signals in 12 and 13 of the 15 samples evaluated. Also note the lack of contrary changes. ADA is consistently up-regulated by MGBG in all samples tested. IL24 is upregulated after MGBG exposure in HIV infected samples but not controls. Accordingly these six genes were further evaluated by quantitative real-time reverse-transcriptase PCR.







TABLE 5







Signals obtained with 6 most consistently changed genes














FCGR1a
LILRA1
SPP1
SGNE1
ADA
IL24



















Sample
+
−
+
−
+
−
+
−
+
−
+
−






















H5-1293
264
2416
21
137
64
3875
14
45
1845
578
350
65


H5-1294
33
142
1
18
22
9523
8
488
4290
84
1364
247


H5-1327
14
38
15
37
1684
2276
79
188
832
231
59
23


H5-1333
347
874
164
81
487
2789
44
130
5472
376
577
127


H6-004
415
917
40
44
1480
8780
17
751
769
130
111
25


H6-017
461
201
129
369
113
7689
7
1039
6724
3365
85
3376


H6-071
59
723
10
148
34
1938
10
99
6874
376
1940
10


H6-144
800
1012
65
413
143
247
13
40
1964
839
178
294


H6-145
1561
2078
246
187
458
2772
12
80
7488
336
375
14


Average
439
933
77
159
498
4432
23
318
4029
702
560
465


C6-019
136
40
73
1055
53
5314
13
1603
5384
1509
578
2035


C6-139
51
91
42
313
81
1972
2
265
2900
1014
206
173


C6-146
612
188
99
191
264
988
3
33
5895
1055
1549
474


C6-186
53
46
94
344
232
1629
45
208
5781
1559
925
788


C6-187
1362
68
212
647
1519
3456
13
122
6428
1519
163
748


M6-177
1435
494
277
3219
1647
1080
2
112
6731
2104
166
360


Average
608
155
133
962
633
2407
13
391
5520
1460
598
763
















TABLE 6





Fold changes of six most consistently changed genes.













 











Fold change (downregulation in upper panel; upregulation in lower group) in presence of 10 μM MGBG. Shaded cells were not significantly changed. Bold numbers indicate samples that had changes in signal of greater than 2 fold in the opposite direction of the majority of samples for a given gene.






Example 2
Quantitative RT-PCR Confirmation of Genes Affected by MGBG
To evaluate the effect of MGBG on gene expression, blood samples were obtained from patients (N=18, 10 HIV-infected and 8 Healthy Controls). Mononuclear cells were isolated via Percoll gradient centrifugation. The cells were split into two tubes, one treated with 10 μM of MGBG and the other non-treated. The cells were then cultured overnight in RPMI media plus 10% fetal bovine serum at 37 C under non-adherent conditions, collected, lysed using Trizol solution, and total RNA prepared according to manufacturer's instructions (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, Calif.).
Approximately 200 ng of total RNA prepared from each sample was converted to cDNA using the First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit for RT-PCR [AMV] kit (Roche Applied Diagnostics, Indianapolis, Ind.) according to manufacturer's instructions. Around 5 ng of cDNA sample was then used for PCR performed on a LightCycler (Roche Applied Diagnostics, Indianapolis, Ind.) using the LightCycler FastStart DNA Master SYBR Green I kit. PCR conditions are as follows: 1 cycle of denaturation at 95° C. for 10 minutes, followed by 45 cycles of 95° C. for 10 seconds, 68° C. for 10 seconds, and 72° C. for 16 seconds.
The sequences of gene-specific primers evaluated are listed below. All samples were also amplified with the human β-actin LightCycler-Primer set (Roche Diagnostics).







TABLE 7







Primers employed for Quantitative RT-PCR (QRT-PCR)









Gene
Forward (5′ --->)
Reverse (5′ --->)













G1P3
AGCAGCGTCGTCATAGGTAAT
ACAGGAGGATCACTTGAGGCT




SEQ ID NO: 1
SEQ ID NO: 2


 


TGFB1
CCAGCATCTGCAAAGCTCC
TTGTACAGGGCCAGGACCTT



SEQ ID NO: 3
SEQ ID NO: 4


 


CSF3R
TGTTCGGCCTCCTGCTGTT
GCTTCTTTTCATCCTCCTCCA



SEQ ID NO: 5
SEQ ID NO: 6


 


GPR43
TGCTACGAGAACTTCACCGAT
GAAGCACACCAGGAAATTGA



SEQ ID NO: 7
SEQ ID NO: 8


 


MX2
TCTTCCCTGACCTTCACGAA
CATTTATTAAGCAGTTACAATGCTG



SEQ ID NO: 9
SEQ ID NO: 10


 


TNFSF10
CTACCTCATATCAGTTTGCTAGCAG
CGATCTTTTAGTGGTGCCTCTT



SEQ ID NO: 11
SEQ ID NO: 12


 


IFIT2
CAGTAAAGAGCTTACTCCTGTAGCG
AAGCCTCAGAATCTGCTCCATT



SEQ ID NO: 13
SEQ ID NO: 14


 


FCAR
GACTTTCCCATGCCTTTCAT
ACCGGAATCTGTAGTGCCCTA



SEQ ID NO: 15
SEQ ID NO: 16


 


ORM1
CGACAGGACCAGTGCATCTAT
AACTCTCCCAGTTGCTCCTT



SEQ ID NO: 17
SEQ ID NO: 18


 


TNFRSF10c
CCCAGCTGCTGAAGAGACAAT
ATGATCCCTACGATGGTGCAT



SEQ ID NO: 19
SEQ ID NO: 20


 


CLECSF7
GGATAGCTGTTGTTTCAGAGAAAGG
CTTCTCACAAATACTATATGAGGGC



SEQ ID NO: 21
SEQ ID NO: 22


 


GPR86
AACACGACCATCGTAGGGTGA
TTTGAGGTGATGGTGGGATA



SEQ ID NO: 23
SEQ ID NO: 24


 


CSPG2
CACCGATGGCCATGTAAATA
TGTCCAGGAAAAGCCATCTT



SEQ ID NO: 25
SEQ ID NO: 26


 


CD14
TGGAACAGGTGCCTAAAGGA
ACAGGGTCGAACGTGCACA



SEQ ID NO: 27
SEQ ID NO: 28


 


NBS1
TGAATGAGGAGTTCTGGTACCT
AGTCAAGCCACAGACTAGGTGTAA



SEQ ID NO: 29
SEQ ID NO: 30


 


CHI3L1
ACACAGATTTGAGCTCAGCCC
ATGTTTGGCTCCTTGGTGAT



SEQ ID NO: 31
SEQ ID NO: 32


 


CLEC4E
AGGTATTAAGCCCAGTGCCTAA
GAAAATTATGTCTTTTGTGGGAACA



SEQ ID NO: 33
SEQ ID NO: 34


 


SIGLEC5
TTTCTGAGATGAAGTCGAGGG
TCTGCTTGGAGCACTTAAACA



SEQ ID NO: 35
SEQ ID NO: 36


 


GPR109B
AATTGTGTTGCTCCTGGAGGA
CAATGCCATTTCCTTTCCCA



SEQ ID NO: 37
SEQ ID NO: 38


 


TNFa
Quantitect cat
104 bp amplicon



# QT01079561


 


1Qgag
TTGCCCATGGTTTCCAGAACAAG
GGGATTTTTTCCTTGTGTTTTCA



SEQ ID NO: 39
SEQ ID NO: 40


 


8pGAG
AGTATGGATCTCAGGCGGT
CATCGGTTGTAACATTACC



SEQ ID NO: 41
SEQ ID NO: 42


 


PI3
ATGGCCTTAGCTCTTAGCCAA
GCTCTTGCGCTTTGACTTTA



SEQ ID NO: 43
SEQ ID NO: 44


 


IL1RN
AGACCTTCTATCTGAGGAACAACCA
TTGTCCTGCTTTCTGTTCTCG



SEQ ID NO: 45
SEQ ID NO: 46


 


IL6
TCCACTGGGCACAGAACTTAT
TCTGGCTCTGAAACAAAGGA



SEQ ID NO: 47
SEQ ID NO: 48


 


IL1A
TGCCTTCTGCTTTTAAGTTGC
GATGAAGGGGTTCCCATAAA



SEQ ID NO: 49
SEQ ID NO: 50


 


SPP1
AGCCACAAGCAGTCCAGATTAT
TTGACCTCAGAAGATGCACTATC



SEQ ID NO: 51
SEQ ID NO: 52


 


FCGR1A
ACTCTGGGTTATACTGGTGCGA
CCAAAGAGATTTCTAAATCCCAC



SEQ ID NO: 53
SEQ ID NO: 54


 


SGNE1
TCCCTGTGAATGACAGCATGT
AAACTGCAAGAAATCTGAGCC



SEQ ID NO: 55
SEQ ID NO: 56


 


LILRA1
CAGTCAGGCAGAAGTATGCAAA
TCCCTTTGTCCTAGAAAGTTGAGG



SEQ ID NO: 57
SEQ ID NO: 58


 


ADA
GCTACCACACCCTGGAAGA
CCGTTTGGTCATCTGGTAATC



SEQ ID NO: 59
SEQ ID NO: 60


 


IL24
AACAGAGAGGGATGCTTGGAT
CACCAAGGGAAAGGGATGAT



SEQ ID NO: 61
SEQ ID NO: 62









Of the genes evaluated, MGBG has the biggest effect on SPP1 (Table 8). It consistently down-regulates SPP1 levels in all of the unsorted samples looked at, with fold changes between the untreated and the treated of up to 300 in certain samples. IL1RN seems to be down-regulated, though not as consistently (15 out of 18 samples) as SPP1. SGNE3 also seems to be mostly down-regulated, although the level of inhibition in most samples is low. Genes that are up-regulated by MGBG include ADA and IL24. ADA is strongly induced and is upregulated in all but one sample. IL24 did not exhibit a consistent pattern of change in the presence of MGBG (Table 8). These results are in contrast to the results obtained by QRT-PCR with many other genes, of which results with 6 genes whose transcription appears unaffected by MGBG are presented in Table 9. Thus the effects of MGBG on osteopontin and adenosine deaminase are highly specific.







TABLE 8







Fold change of 5 genes Identified by microarray by QRT-PCR










Down-regulated
Up-regulated



Genes
Genes












Sample
SPP1
IL1RN
SGNE3
IL24
ADA















H1293
−18.90
−4.92
1.79
2.50
3.01


H1294
−300.25
−2.31
−7.11
−2.41
3.76


H1327
−2.14
−8.28
−2.50
−1.48
1.16


H1333
−18.90
−17.75
−4.41
−1.30
7.16


H6_4
−20.11
−10.41
1.58
5.35
16.80


H6_17
−83.87
−3.73
−3.25
1.20
4.69


H6_71
−6.59
1.12
−1.30
1.09
18.77


H6_144
−1.30
−1.73
−2.39
−1.13
2.33


H6_145
−8.82
−1.36
−2.43
1.12
13.00


H1334
−95.67
−14.22

11.88
3.34


C6_139
−7.89
−1.87
−1.48
2.57
5.90


C6_146
−1.95
−1.78
1.61
2.55
10.06


C6_19
−46.21
8.63
−3.61
2.25
7.52


C6_186
−5.90
−2.27
−1.66
1.01
4.23


C6_187
−2.11
1.59
−1.13
−1.17
7.21


C5_75
−6.15
−8.17

1.92
1.38


C5_76
−1.28
−19.56

1.32
−0.73


C5_78
−467.88
−1.77

1.79
6.68


AVERAGE
−60.9
−4.9
−1.9
1.6
6.5


STDEV
+/−124.2
+/−7.1
+/−2.5
+/−3.2
+/−5.3


MIN
−467.9
−19.6
−7.1
−2.4
−0.7


MAX
−1.3
8.6
1.8
11.9
18.8


% >2 fold
83%
55%
50%
33%
83%


Changed





Table 8 shows the genes affected by MGBG in the unsorted samples. The numbers represent the fold change between the untreated and the treated. Negative numbers indicate fold reduction and the positive numbers represent fold increase changes. Samples that were not evaluated with a particular gene are shaded grey. Significant reductions or increases (>= 2 fold) are in bold font. As shown, OPN or SPP1 is highly inhibited after treatment with MGBG.













TABLE 9







Results obtained with six genes that were not affected by MGBG













Sample
G1P3
MX2
IL6
NBS1
FCGR1A
LILRA1
















H1293
−2.85
1.13
1.74
−4.35
−10.78
1.34


H1294
1.47
−2.11
−6.15
−8.51
−17.15
−4.79


H1327
1.22
−2.85
−1.09
−2.51
−2.22
−1.31


H1333
−1.66
1.23
−5.46
−1.89
−3.86
1.28


H6_4
1.68
6.06
14.72
3.63
1.05
13.45


H6_17
1.92
2.03
−5.31
1.68
−1.61
−1.91


H6_71
−1.25
−1.09
3.71
1.25
−1.84
1.01


H6_144
1.31
1.16
1.04
1.35
−1.01
−3.10


H6_145
−1.25
−1.01
1.01
−1.56
−1.72
1.31


H1334
−2.03
4.35
−2.93
2.07
−3.73


C6_139
−1.14
1.56
−4.17
3.51
1.72
−2.87


C6_146
−2.04
−2.81
2.20
−1.09
5.94
1.52


C6_19
2.13
3.07
2.83
3.51
2.39
−3.97


C6_186
−1.14
1.16
−2.71
1.04
−1.97
−2.27


C6_187
1.22
−1.33
−4.06
4.08
19.03
1.11


C5_75
−2.99
−1.77
1.74
2.31
1.16


C5_76
−6.63
−3.27
1.30
1.14
−0.41


C5_78
−1.95
1.36
1.46
1.27
−0.43


AVERAGE
0.96
1.55
1.91
1.65
2.25
1.71


STDEV
0.57
1.52
3.35
1.26
4.42
3.41


MIN
−6.63
−3.27
−6.15
−8.51
−17.15
−4.79


MAX
2.13
6.06
14.72
4.08
19.03
13.45









Example 3
Evaluation of Changes Induced by MGBG for OPN, ADA and Other Genes
The changes induced by MGBG in different blood cell types were determined for osteopontin and adenosine deaminase and 7 other genes. For this experiment, blood samples were obtained from 6 healthy controls (3 men/3 women from 20 to 55 years of age) and mononuclear cells were isolated via Percoll gradient centrifugation. The cells were then incubated for 3 hours in RPMI media plus 10% fetal bovine serum at 37 C. At that point MGBG was added to 10 μM to half of each sample and then the cells were incubated at 37 C for 20 more hours. The cells were then bound to magnetic beads coated with antibodies to human CD16. Bound cells (CD16 expressing) were separated from unbound cells using an AutoMACs according to manufacturer's instructions (Miltenyi, Auburn Calif.). Then CD16+ cells are released from the magnetic beads and both the CD16+ and CD16− cells are combined with magnetic beads coated with antibodies to human CD14. Antibody bound and unbound cells were then separated using the AutoMACs machine. This results in four different cell fractions:
1. Cells that neither express CD16 nor CD14 (the −/− Cells). This is mostly T lymphocytes;
2. Cells that only express CD16. This includes contaminating granulocytes not removed by Percoll centrifugation and CD16+ monocytes with very low CD14 expression;
3. Cells that express both CD16 and CD14. This includes monocytes that are expressing CD16+ and macrophages (which express high levels of both); and
4. Cells that only express CD14. This would include most normal human monocytes.
After separation, cells of each fraction are washed with PBS and the number of viable cells determined by trypan blue exclusion. RNA is then prepared from each cell group using TRIZOL, according to manufacturer's instructions.
The results obtained are presented in FIG. 2. It can be appreciated that of the four cell fractions, the −/− cells are the most numerous with a median yield of 4.2 million cells. Approximately ten fold less CD14+ and double positive cells were isolated (4.7 and 3.8×105 cells, respectively). The lowest number of cells is in the CD16 single positive fraction which had a median yield of 6.0×104 cells. β-actin levels as measured by QRT-PCR accurately reflected cell counts with the highest threshold cycles obtained from the CD16+ cells and the lowest values from the double-negative cells. For osteopontin, the highest β-actin-normalized signals were obtained from CD14+ monocytes and CD14/16++ monocyte and macrophages. Upon exposure to osteopontin RNA levels in the CD14+ monocyte fraction decreased the most with a median reduction of 4.8 fold (0.21 of no MGBG) which was significantly less than 1.0 (no change) by the Wilcoxon signed rank test (p=0.03). In contrast changes induced by MGBG in CD14/16++ cells, CD16+ cells, and double negative cells were 0.61, 1.12, and 0.70, respectively. None of these changes were significantly different than 1.0. Thus, in healthy individuals MGBG exposure reproducibly reduces osteopontin RNA signals in monocytes.
For adenosine deaminase, levels of RNA signal were approximately equal in all four cell fractions (from 1 to 10% of actin levels). Exposure to MGBG resulted in significant increases in ADA transcription in CD14+ monocytes (median change 10.8 fold, p=0.0156). Much lower but still significant changes were seen in CD14/CD16++ cells (median change 2.8 fold). Double negative cells and CD16+ cells did not change significantly. Thus as is the case for osteopontin, RNA changes are primarily seen in monocytes after exposure to MGBG. Smaller changes are also detected in CD14/CD16 double positive cells. Thus monocytes and macrophages are the primary cellular targets of MGBG.
To determine if MGBG treatment might be globally affecting monocytes and macrophages we looked at four additional gene that are known to be highly expressed in monocytes and macrophages. The genes were CD14 (which also provides a level of quality control on our cell separations) and interleukin 1 receptor antagonist (IL1RN), G coupled receptor 43 (GPR43, also known as the free fatty acid receptor), and the cytokine TNFα. For all four genes levels of RNA in monocytes and macrophages ranged between 10 to 100 times greater than that seen in double negative lymphocytes. IL1RN CD14, and TNFα had approximately equal levels of RNA signal in both CD14+ monocytes and CD14/CD16++ macrophages. For GPR43, median RNA levels were 5 to 10 fold higher in CD14/16++ cells relative to CD14+ monocytes. Exposure to MGBG resulted in no clear trend in expression changes. In particular exposure to MGBG significantly lowered RNA signal of TNFα in monocytes (median signal=0.32, p=0.03) but not the signals of the other 3 genes. In contrast exposure to MGBG caused a slight increase in GPR43 expression (media signal=2.4, p=0.03) and a slight decrease in RNA signals for CD14 (median signal=0.55, p=0.02) in CD14/CD16++ macrophages. Thus evaluation of other monocyte and macrophage specific genes did provide evidence for a global and systematic effect of MGBG on gene expression in those cells. Thus the more profound effects of MGBG on osteopontin and adenosine deaminase are specific.
Example 4
Effect of MGBG on Osteopontin Protein Secretion
Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells (PBMCs) were isolated from patients diagnosed with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS), Alzheimer's Disease (AD), Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV), Breast Cancer, AIDS Dementia, and healthy donors. The heparinised blood was mixed with equal volumes of sterile phosphate-buffered saline (Ca−+, Mg++ free PBS) and layered over Percoll (Amersham Biosciences, Piscataway, N.J.) at 1.087 g/ml. The cells were centrifuged and the mononuclear cell layer was collected. The PBMCs were cultured in a concentration of 1×106 cells/ml in non-adherent conditions in polypropylene tubes containing complete media (RPMI 1640, 10% fetal bovine serum (HyClone, Logan, Utah), 1% Sodium Pyruvate) and incubated in a 5% CO2, 37° C. humidified incubator. The cells were grown in the presence of 0 μM, 0.1 μM, 1 μM, 10 μM, or 100 μM MGBG plus complete media and the cell culture supernatants (CCS) were isolated on the fifth day and frozen at −20° C. until ready to be tested. Human Osteopontin (OPN) levels were measured with the Human Osteopontin ELISA kit (R&D Systems, Inc., Minneapolis, Minn.) according to manufacturer's instructions. The CCS were tested in duplicate and the Magellan v. 4.0 software (Salzburg, Austria) was used to analyze the results.
The average OPN levels (ng/ml) in 0 μM, 0.1 μM, 1 μM, 10 μM, and 100 μM MGBG were measured. The results are depicted in FIGS. 3-7 as a graph comparing diseased sample with normal sample. In FIGS. 3-7, each point on the graph is the average of each sample with standard error represented as error bars. The solid lines represent diseased cells and the dashed lines represent normal cells.
The average OPN levels obtained from the CCS of healthy/normal samples (n=3) were 270, 9.69, 4.85, 1.07, and 0.14 ng/ml in cultures with 0 μM, 0.1 μM, 1 μM, 10 μM, and 100 μM MGBG, respectively. The corresponding average OPN levels obtained from the CCS of breast cancer samples (n=3), as shown in FIG. 3, were 125.96, 20.89, 8.87, 2.12, and 0.84 ng/ml. The corresponding average OPN levels obtained from the CCS of the AD sample (n=1), as shown in FIG. 4, were 0.926, 0.477, 0.201, 0.136, and 0 ng/ml. For AD, each point on the graph is the average of the duplicates tested on the ELISA plate. The corresponding average OPN levels obtained from the CCS of HIV samples (n=2), as shown in FIG. 5, were 78.698, 11.833, 3.481, 0.447, and 0 ng/ml.
PBMCs obtained from ALS and AIDS Dementia patients were tested with 0 μM and 10 μM only. The average ALS (n=2) CCS values, as shown in FIG. 6, were 525.644 (0 μM) and 17.669 (10 μM); and the average AIDS Dementia CCS (AIRL2005-374) value, as shown in FIG. 7, was 30.958 (0 μM) and 0.8905 (10 μM). Cell viability data showed that the cells at each MGBG concentration were at least 75% viable when the CCS were collected.
Additionally, cells being targeted by MGBG were investigated. Phenotypic analysis showed that increasing concentrations of MGBG resulted in decreasing yields of CD14+ macrophages but did not affect levels of CD16+/CD14− cells. To elucidate the effects of MGBG and OPN on cell motility, migration assays were conducted. MGBG at 10 μM inhibited macrophage Osteopontin production from >200 ng/mL to nondetectable levels while simultaneously inhibiting HeLa cell invasion into a Matrigel matrix. The results show that MGBG inhibits OPN production of mononuclear cells in vitro and that inhibition of OPN by MGBG is sufficient to inhibit cell migration.
Example 5
Effect of Removing Extracellular Osteopontin on Macrophage Differentiation
To observe the effects of OPN blocking antibody on macrophage activation, 10 μg of antibody (Immuno-Biological Laboratories, Inc., Minneapolis, Minn.) was added to non-adherent PBMC cultures for 24 and 72 hours. The cells were labeled with mouse anti-human CD14-TriColor (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, Calif.) and mouse anti-human CD16-FITC (fluorescein isothiocyanate; Dako, Carpinteria, Calif.) according to the manufacturer's suggestion; an isotype control was also used. CD14+ monocytes and CD14+/CD16+ macrophages were analyzed by flow cytometry at 24 and 72 hours after cell isolation (BD FACScan, San Jose, Calif. with FACS Express 3 software). Results showed that incubation with neutralizing osteopontin antibody increased the yield of CD14+ monocytes 5.9 fold at 24 hours (2.5% CD14+ in presence of SPP1 Ab vs 0.4% with control Ab) and 16.9 fold at 72 hours (3.7% CD14+ vs 0.2%). Additionally, at 24 hours the yield of CD14/16++ macrophages was reduced 4.5 fold in the presence of neutralizing osteopontin antibodies (0.6% vs 2.5% in presence of control Ab). Additionally CD14/16++ cells isolated in the presence of osteopontin neutralizing antibodies never achieved the typical increase in side scatter seen under normal conditions. Thus removal of osteopontin prevents normal macrophage differentiation and increases the prevalence of CD16− monocytes.
Example 6
Effect of Adding Exogenous OPN on Macrophage Yield
To determine the role of exogenous recombinant human OPN (rOPN) in macrophage activation, 10 μg/ml rOPN (R&D Systems, Inc., Minneapolis, Minn.) was added to non-adherent PBMC cultures grown in complete or in serum free medium for 24 and 72 hours, and analyzed via flow cytometry. The cells were labeled with (x-axis) mouse anti-human CD14− TriColor (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, Calif.) and (y-axis) mouse anti-human CD16-FITC (fluorescein isothiocyanate; Dako, Carpinteria, Calif.) according to the manufacturer's suggestion. As seen in FIG. 8, rOPN increases CD14+/CD16+ cell population. At 24 hours, cells incubated with rOPN in complete medium had no significant accumulation of CD14+/CD16+ cells in comparison to control (no rOPN in the medium). However, at 72 hours a 11-fold increase in CD14+/CD16+ cells were observed in cells incubated with rOPN in comparison to control. A 2.97-fold increase in CD14+/CD16+ cells was also observed with cells cultured with rOPN for 72 hours in serum free conditions in comparison to serum free control. Shown in the upper right quadrant in FIG. 8 is the percentage of cells that are double positive for CD14 and CD16 surface markers.
Example 7
Osteopontin Induces Increased Macrophage Activation and Cytokine Secretion
We investigated macrophage activation via flow cytometry and levels of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines in cell culture supernatants of mononuclear cells. 10 μg/ml recombinant human OPN (rOPN) was added to mononuclear cells cultured for 3 days, with and without fetal bovine serum (FBS) in cell culture medium, and analyzed via flow cytometry. At 24 hours, cells incubated with rOPN and FBS had no significant accumulation of CD14+/CD16+ cells in comparison to FBS-only control. However, at 72 hours, a 12-fold increase in CD14+/CD16+ cells were observed in cells incubated with rOPN in comparison to control. An increase in CD14+/CD16+ cells was also observed with cells cultured in serum free medium and rOPN in comparison to control. To observe the effects of OPN neutralizing antibody on macrophage activation, 10 μg of antibody was added to cultures for 3 days. The amount of CD14+/CD16+ cells was inhibited by 3.97-fold at 24 hours and 3.76-fold at 72 hours. We also investigated the levels of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines in all cell culture supernatants of each time point. On average, IL-6, IL-1β, TNF-α, IL-10, and IL-12p40 were at least 50-fold higher with rOPN at 24 and 72 hours in all culture conditions in comparison to control. IL-12p70 and IL-4 levels had no significant difference at any time point and culture condition. In conclusion, we have found that rOPN increased macrophage activation by the third day. Heightened levels of most of the cytokines measured were also observed when the cells were exposed to rOPN, suggesting that OPN induces mononuclear cells to secrete these cytokines.
Example 8
Effect of MGBG on Osteopontin in vivo
Many chronic diseases are associated with elevation in osteopontin production in diseased tissues. In order to test whether MGBG, which regulates OPN production in vitro, would have the same effect in vivo, an animal model study was performed. Simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) infected rhesus macaques develop AIDS and a macrophage infiltrative process of the brain associated dementia within months after infection. MGBG was used in two trials in SIV-infected animals. Rhesus macaques were infected with SIVmac251 and depleted of CD8+ T lymphocytes by administration of a humanized CD8-depleting antibody. This resulted in a rapid depletion of CD8+ T lymphocytes and a very rapid viral infection with a short time course to AIDS. These monkeys were then treated with MGBG as described.
In the first trial three animals (2 treated and 1 untreated) were used. The animals that were treated with MGBG were initially given 200 mg/m2 MGBG, and then treated 7 and 14 days later with 300 mg/m2 and 400 mg/m2, respectively of MGBG. While the untreated animal developed SIVE by the third week, the treated animals showed no indications of SIVE or DRG infiltration. The trial was halted when the treated animals developed severe GI toxicity at an MGBG dose of 400 mg/m2.
In the second trial 2 treated and 2 untreated animals were used. In this trial the animals were treated with a bi-weekly dosing of 250 mg/m2 MGBG. The untreated animals were SIVE+ in 50 days post-infection and developed AIDS/SIVE within 85 days. The treated animals showed no evidence for SIV disease. Further, no drug related toxicity was seen through 8 cycles of MGBG.
In both trials, the infected untreated animals developed AIDS and dementia, but none of the treated animals became ill. FIG. 9 shows that in the infected, untreated animal brains, characteristic macrophage infiltration was observed, but with MGBG (PA001) treatment, no pathology was observed. SIV-infected macaques treated with 4 doses of MGBG (PA001) demonstrated absence of SIV-associated macrophages in the frontal cortex compared to non-treated.
These same brains stained with an antibody to OPN, showed that treatment was associated with complete removal of OPN whereas the infected uninfected animal's brain had large concentrations of OPN (FIG. 10). Similarly, as shown in FIG. 11, lymph nodes from the animals showed differential levels of OPN staining with treatment (BI46 and CB18) associated with markedly decreased levels of OPN. These results show that MGBG treatment of an OPN associated disease turns off OPN production in vivo with associated reversal of pathologic processes.
Example 9
Effect of MGBG on Osteopontin RNA and Protein Production
Polyamine analogs SL47 and SL93 as well as MGBG were compared with dexamethasone and growth factor MCSF in an OPN production inhibition assay. 10 μM of each drug was added to un-stimulated PBMC cultures at time=0 and cells were harvested 1, 3, and 6 days later for quantitative OPN RNA and protein production analysis. FIG. 12 shows the effect of (from left to right) SL47, SL93, MGBG, dexamethasone, and MCSF on OPN RNA As seen in FIG. 12, OPN RNA expression was inhibited in a time dependant manner for SL47, SL93, and MGBG. Dexamethasone and MCSF, on the other hand, had no effect on OPN RNA expression.
Similar results were observed for OPN production. FIG. 13 shows the quantitative levels of OPN produced in cultures treated with SL47, SL93, MGBG, and dexamethasone as described above. Complete inhibition of OPN protein production was observed in PBMCs treated with MGBG as well as polyamine analogs SL47 and SL93.
All references and publications cited herein are incorporated by reference in their entirety.
It should be noted that there are alternative ways of implementing the present invention. Accordingly, the present embodiments are to be considered as illustrative and not restrictive, and the invention is not to be limited to the details given herein, but may be modified within the scope and equivalents of the appended claims.

## Claims

1. A method of treating, or alleviating the symptoms of a condition comprising administering to a subject in need of such treatment an effective amount of MGBG or a salt thereof, wherein the condition is rheumatoid arthritis.