alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                       1,483,046
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           1,113
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               172,769
<TRADING-ASSETS>                               172,943
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  1,236,836
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       1,173,697
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                         1,175,196
<LOANS>                                     16,114,898
<ALLOWANCE>                                    318,261
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              21,600,836
<DEPOSITS>                                  15,539,951
<SHORT-TERM>                                 2,514,952
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            481,621
<LONG-TERM>                                    821,760
<COMMON>                                       491,694
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    150,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,309,685
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              21,600,836
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              1,113,403
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              110,612
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                21,363
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             1,245,378
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             332,265
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             498,817
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          746,561
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   63,421
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               2,307
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                655,939
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                339,764
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   217,708
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.12
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    5.49
<LOANS-NON>                                    124,111
<LOANS-PAST>                                    20,849
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                10,781
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               305,802
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   72,629
<RECOVERIES>                                    24,857
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              318,261
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        


</TABLE>
combustionsurvey - Fw: Boiler MACT Reconsideration - CO CEMS Data 

 

-----Forwarded by Brian Shrager/RTP/USEPA/US on 07/16/2011 03:31PM -----

To: Brian Shrager/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

From: "Stapper, Carole" <CaroleStapper@templeinland.com> 

Date: 07/15/2011 06:20PM 

Cc: "Foulke, Russ" <RussFoulke@templeinland.com> 

Subject: Boiler MACT Reconsideration - CO CEMS Data

(See attached file: EPA Boiler MACT Reconsideration - CO CEMS Data.pdf) 

(See attached file: TIN Rome Mill WFB CO CEMS Data.xlsx)

Mr. Shrager: 

 

Temple-Inland is submitting CO CEMS data for the Boiler MACTreconsideration process as 

requested in the Federal Register notice publishedon May 18, 2011. I was going to submit this 

directly to the docket, butit does not appear to be “open” for submittals. Since you arethe point 

of contact listed in the notice, I assume it is satisfactory to sendthis directly to you. Please let 

me know if you have any questions. 

 

Thank you. 

 

Carole J. Stapper 

Environmental Manager - Air 

Temple-Inland

Office: 512-434-1048 

Fax: 512-434-8151 

CaroleStapper@templeinland.com 

From: Brian Shrager <Shrager.Brian@epamail.epa.gov>

To: <combustionsurvey@erg.com>

Date: 7/16/2011 3:33 PM

Subject: Fw: Boiler MACT Reconsideration - CO CEMS Data

Attachments:

 

EPA Boiler MACT Reconsideration - CO CEMS Data.pdf; TIN Rome Mill WFB CO 

CEMS Data.xlsx

Page 1 of 2

file://C:\Documents and Settings\GGibson\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\4E21AF51DO... 8/2/2011
********** Confidentiality Notice ********** 

This electronic transmission and any attached documents or other writings 

are confidential and are for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) 

identified above. This message may contain information that is privileged, 

confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure under applicable law. 

If the receiver of this information is not the intended recipient, or the 

employee, or agent responsible for delivering the information to the 

intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, reading, 

dissemination, distribution, copying or storage of this information is 

strictly prohibited. If you have received this information in error, please 

notify the sender by return email and delete the electronic transmission, 

including all attachments from your system. 

= 

Page 2 of 2

file://C:\Documents and Settings\GGibson\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\4E21AF51DO... 8/2/2011
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 May 28, 2019 s0520

Order 

Clerk

May 28, 2019

157757 & (18)

KAY BURKS,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 157757

COA: 341566

Bay CC: 16-003812-CD

INDEPENDENT BANK,

Defendant-Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 8, 2018 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion to 

stay is DENIED.
1 District Judge of the Eastern District of Louisiana sitting

by designation. 

 

**Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-30938

CALVIN GEYEN, JR.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

VERSUS

KENNETH S. APFEL; COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

(97-CV-1284)

November 8, 1999

Before DAVIS and JONES, Circuit Judges, and LEMELLE1, District

Judge.

PER CURIAM:**

After reviewing the record, along with the briefs of the

parties, we are satisfied that the Commissioner’s findings are

supported by substantial evidence. Accordingly, the judgment of

the district court is 

AFFIRMED.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Environmental Protection Agency

          - [FRL-8304-7] 

# AGENCY:

Environmental Protection Agency. 

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

The United States Environmental Protection Agency is announcing the 2007 Annual Meeting of the Ozone Transport Commission (OTC). This OTC meeting will explore options available for reducing ground-level ozone precursors in a multi-pollutant context. 

# DATES:

The meeting will be held on June 6-7, 2007 starting at 9 a.m. and ending at 5 p.m. 

# ADDRESSES:

Renaissance Providence Hotel, 5 Avenue of the Arts, Providence, Rhode Island 02903; (800) 617-2893. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Questions regarding the agenda and registration for this meeting and all press inquiries should be directed to Kromeklia Bryant, Ozone Transport Commission/MANE-VU Office, 444 North Capitol Street, NW., Suite 638, Washington, DC 20001; (202) 508-3840; e-mail:                         *ozone@otcair.org*; Web site:                         *http://www.otcair.org*.                     

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 contain at Section 184 provisions for the “Control of Interstate Ozone Air Pollution.” Section 184(a) establishes an “Ozone Transport Region” (OTR) comprised of the States of Connecticut, Delaware, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, parts of Virginia and the District of Columbia. The purpose of the Ozone Transport Commission is to deal with ground-level ozone formation, transport, and control within the OTR. 

*Type of Meeting:*                     Open.                 

*Agenda:*                     Copies of the final agenda will be available from the OTC office (202) 508-3840; by e-mail:                     *ozone@otcair.org*                     or via the OTC Web site at                     *http://www.otcair.org*.                 

Dated: April 17, 2007. 

Donald S. Welsh, 

Regional Administrator, Region III.

[FR Doc. E7-7898 Filed 4-24-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
(logo) pwc

 

 

**Report of IndependentRegistered Public Accounting Firm**

 

To the Board of Directors, PNCFinancial Services Group, Inc.:

 

We have examinedmanagement’s assertion, included in the accompanying Report on Assessmentof Compliance with Regulation AB Servicing Criteria, that Midland Loan Services,a division of PNC Bank, National Association (“Midland” or the“Company”) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for alltransactions serviced on the *Enterprise!* Loan Management System (the“Platform”), as of December 31, 2016 and for the year then ended,excluding criteria 1122(d)(1)(iii), 1122(d)(3)(i)(B), 1122(d)(3)(i)(C),1122(d)(3)(i)(D), 1122(d)(3)(ii), 1122(d)(3)(iii), 1122(d)(3)(iv), and1122(d)(4)(xv), which the Company has determined are not applicable to theservicing activities performed by it with respect to the Platform. Managementis responsible for the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria. Ourresponsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion based on ourexamination.

 

Our examination was conductedin accordance with attestation standards of the Public Company AccountingOversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a testbasis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the applicableservicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considerednecessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of selectedasset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing ofselected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whetherthe Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selectedactivities in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our procedureswere limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed bythe Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were notdesigned to detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurredprior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances oramounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by thisreport. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for ouropinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on theCompany’s compliance with the servicing criteria.

 

In our opinion,management’s assertion that Midland complied with the aforementionedapplicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016for the Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects.

 

 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

 

February 17, 2017

 

 

*PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP,1100 Walnut Street, Suite 1300, Kansas City, MO 64106*

*T: (816) 472 7921, F: (816)218 1890 www.pwc.com/us*
No. 56624.

protests 178505-K, etc. (New York).

#### American Roland Corp. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Cole, J.

The protests were dismissed.
Case: 2:12-cv-01185-EAS-EPD Doc #: 54 Filed: 11/15/13 Page: 1 of 1  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-08T20:48:53-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Corporate Trust Services**

  MAC R1204-010  9062 Old Annapolis Road  Columbia, MD 21045  Tel: 410 884 2000  Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

Wells Fargo CommercialMortgage Securities, Inc. 

375 PARK AVE FL 2

Wells Fargo Securities, LLC

NEW YORK, New York 10152-0002

 

Re: Annual Statement ofCompliance for Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Securities, Inc., CommercialMortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2016-C32

 

Per the Pooling and Servicing Agreementdated as of February 1, 2016 (the "Agreement"), the undersigned, aduly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the yearending December 31, 2016 (the "Reporting Period"):

 

(a) A review of Wells Fargo'sactivities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under theAgreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and

 

(b) To the best of suchofficer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of itsobligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

 

February 27, 2017

 

 

/s/ Brian Smith

BRIAN SMITH

Vice President

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll  go far |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------|
**
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, Frederic Chereau,certify that: 

 
1.
I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of LogicBioTherapeutics, Inc.; 

 
2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 
3.
[Omitted]; 

 
4.
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: 

 
 a.
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared; 

 
 b.
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financialreporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accountingprinciples; 

 
 c.
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 
 d.
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report), that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and 

 
5.
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 
 a.
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 
 b.
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role inthe registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 
Date: June 5, 2020  By: /s/ Frederic Chereau   Frederic Chereau   
President and Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)
**
Before the Second Division,

May 25, 1949

No. 53183.

#### Goldberg & Seltzer, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 109975-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items of the merchandise consist of sisal bags similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Goldberg & Seltzer, Inc.*(36 C. C. P. A. 64, C. A. D. 399), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 139 (Thursday, July 19, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 42489]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-17587]

[[Page 42489]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army; Corps of Engineers

Notice of Availability of the Draft Feasibility Study; 
Environmental Impact Statement for the Chatfield Reservoir Storage 
Reallocation, Littleton, CO

AGENCY: Department of the Army, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, DoD.

ACTION: Notice of availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 
1969, as amended, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers has prepared a Draft 
Feasibility Report/Environmental Impact Statement (FR/EIS) for the 
Chatfield Reservoir Storage Reallocation Study, Littleton, Colorado and 
by this notice is announcing the extension of the comment period.

DATES: The comment period has been extended for an additional 30 days 
and will end on September 6, 2012.

ADDRESSES: Written comments should be sent to: Department of the Army; 
Corps of Engineers, Omaha District; CENWO-PM-AA; ATTN: Chatfield 
Reservoir Storage Reallocation FR/EIS; 1616 Capitol Avenue; Omaha, NE 
68102-4901. Comments can also be emailed to: 
mailto:Gwyn.M.Jarrett@usace.army.milchatfieldstudy@usace.army.milmailto:Gwyn.M.Jarrett@usace.army.mil. 
Comments on the Draft FR/EIS for the Chatfield Reservoir Storage 
Reallocation Study must be postmarked, emailed, or otherwise submitted 
no later than September 6, 2012.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information and/or 
questions about the Chatfield Reservoir Storage Reallocation FR/EIS, 
please contact Ms. Gwyn Jarrett, Project Manager, by telephone: (402) 
995-2717, by mail: 1616 Capitol Avenue, Omaha, NE 68102-4901, or by 
email: chatfieldstudy@usace.army.mil 
mailto:Gwyn.M.Jarrett@usace.army.mil. For inquiries from the media, 
please contact the USACE Omaha District Public Affairs Officer (PAO), 
Ms. Monique Farmer by telephone (402) 995-2416, by mail: 1616 Capitol 
Avenue, Omaha, NE., 68102-4901, or by email: 
Monique.l.Farmer@usace.army.mil.
    For more information about the Chatfield Reservoir Storage 
Reallocation FR/EIS, please visit http://www.nwo.usace.army.mil/html/pd-p/Plan_Formulation/GI/GI_Chatfield.html.

    Dated: July 11, 2012.
Gwyn Jarrett,
Project Manager.
[FR Doc. 2012-17587 Filed 7-18-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3720-58-P
```
*Internal deliberative information*

	




	


		
	
	
	
		




	 	
!"
#!

$	! %	 	
!



	




	


		
	
	
	
			




	


		
	
	
	
			




	


		
	
	
	
			




	


		
	
	
	
			




	


		
	
	
	
			




	


		
	
	
	
			




	


		
	
	
	
			




	


		
	
	
	
			




	


		
	
	
	
			




	


		
	
	
	
			




	


		
	
	
	
			




	


		
	
	
	
			




	


		
	
	
	
			




	


		
	
	
	
			




	


		
	
	
	
			




	


		
	
	
	
		































&&&	 	
!"
#!

$	! %	 	
!
(Reap. Dec. 9795)

#### Bernhard Altmann Vienna, Inc., Hensel, Bruckmann & Lorbacher, Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 715872, etc.

(Decided October 3, 1960)

*Lamb & Lerch*for the plaintiffs.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Wilson, Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the respective parties:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the undersigned, subject to the approval of the Court, that this stipulation is limited to the items of merchandise identified below and consisting of wool articles.

> That said merchandise is dutiable under section 402(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956.

> That wherever the following items appear in any of the above mentioned reappraisements the value is as follows in English currency:

> Item No. Value

> 2273_ 200 Shillings

> 2172_ 173

> 2271_ 189

> That the cases involved herein may be deemed submitted upon this stipulation.

On the agreed facts, I find.and hold that export value, as that value is defined in section 402(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, T.D. 54165, is the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values for the items of merchandise covered by the said appeals are as follows:

> Item No. Value

> 2273_ 200 shillings

> 2172_ 173 shillings

> 2271_ 189 shillings

All of the above values in English currency.

Judgment will issue accordingly.