### F I LE D U. S . COURT OF AP PE ALS E LEVE NTH CI RCUI T N ove m be r 16, 2005 T HOM AS K. KAHN C L E RK [ DO NO T P UB L I S H] I N THE UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS F O R T H E E L E V E N T H C IR C U IT

________________________ N o. 05- 13287 N on -A rgum entC al endar

________________________ D. C . Do c k e tNo . 0 4 - 6 0 3 5 3 - C V- F AM J A S O N G A M B A , P la in tif f - A p p e lla n t, v ersu s C I T Y O F S U N R I S E , a m u n ic ip a l c o rp o r a tio n , D ef endant -A pp el l ee , R O B E R T M IS IT I, C ap t ai n , etal , i n d i v i d u al s, D efen d an t s.

________________________ A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f orthe S outhe rn D i s tr i c tof F l or i da

_________________________ ( N ove m b e r 16, 2005) B efo re B L A C K , P R Y O R an d H IL L , C i rcu i tJu d g es.2

P E R C U R I A M: J a s on G a m ba br oughtthi s a c t i on c l a i m i ng tha tthe C i ty of S unr i s e ( the “C ity ” ) u n la w f

u lly te rm in a te d a n d r e ta lia te d a g a in s t h im in v io la tio n o f th e F a m ily a nd M e di c a l L e a ve A c tof 1993, 29 U . S . C . § 2614( a ) ( 1) ( the “ F M L A ” ) . G a m ba w a s a p r o b a tio n a ry p o lic e o f f ic e rf o rth e C ity , b u t w a s te rm in a te d f o rf a ilin g to c o m p le te h is p r o b a tio n a ry p e r io d s a tis f a c to r ily . G a m b ac o n te n d s th a t h is t e rm i n a t i o n wa s i n r e t a l i a t i o n f o rh a v i n g r e q u e s t e d l e a v e u n d e rth e F ML A. T he F M L A doe s noti ns ul a t e a n e m pl oy e e w ho ha s r e que s t e d m e di c a l l e a ve f r om be i ng t e rm i na t e d f

orpoorpe r f

orm a nc e . S o l ong a s the e m pl oy e rw oul d ha ve t aken the sa m e a ct i on i tdi d regardl es s of the re qu es tfor l ea ve, there i s no st atut ory v io la tio n . Str i c kland v . W ate rW ork s and Se w e rB d. of

the C i t y of B i rm i ngham , 2 3 9 F .3 d 1 1 9 9 ( 1 1 C ir . 2 0 0 1 ) . A lth o u g h G a m b ac o n te n d s h is te rm in a tio n w a s in th re t al i at i on for havi ng re qu es t ed l ea ve un der F M L A , the C i ty’ s posi t i on thathe w as t erm i nat ed af

t ernu m er ou s docum ent ed i nst ance s of unsat i sf ac t ory j ob perf

orm ance i s w e l l - s uppor t e d by the r e c or d. G a m baw a s gi ve n, a nd doe s notdi s put e tha the r e c e iv e d , s e v e r a l w r itte n n o tic e s o f p r o b le m s in h is jo b p e r f o rm a n c e d u r in g h is pr oba t i ona ry pe r i od. T h e d is tr ic t c o u r t n o te d th a t G a m b a“p r o d u c e d v ir tu a lly n o e v id e n c e in resp o n se” ex cep tt o p o i n tt o th e t em p o ral rel at i o n sh i p b etw een th e l eav e req u est3

a nd hi s t e rm i na t i on. W he r e the e m pl oy e rpr oduc e s s i gni f i c a nte vi de nc e of

the e m pl oy e e ’ s poorpe r f

orm a nc e , i ti s note nough tha tthe r e que s tf orl e a ve a nd the te rm in a tio n a r e c lo s e ly r e la te d in tim e . Wa s c u r a v . C i t y o f So u th Mi a mi , 257 F . 3d 12 38 , 12 48 (11 C i r. 20 01 ) ( af fi rm i ng sum m ary j ud gm entfor e m pl oyerw here th e m pl oy e e pr e s e nt e d vi r tua l l y no e vi de nc e , othe rtha n t e m por a l pr oxi m i ty of the event s) . H a v in g c a r e f

u lly r e v ie w e d th e b r ie f

s a n d th e r e c o r d , a n d f

in d in g n o e rr o rin the di s tr i c tc our t ’ s or de rgr a nt i ng s um m a ry j udgm e nt , w e c onc l ude tha tthe j udgm e nti s due t o be AF F I R ME D.