alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
R&D Film 1, LLC, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

John Does, 

Defendants. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

EASTERN DIVISION 

ORDER 

Case Nos. 2:12-cv-1112; 

2:12-cv-1113; 2:12-cv-1115; 

2:12-cv-1116; 2:12-cv-1117; 

2: 12-cv-1120; 2: 12-cv-1136; 

2:12-cv-1137; 2:12-cv-1138; 

2:12-cv-1139; 

Judge Michael H. Watson 

On August 21, 2013, United States Magistrate Judge Deavers filed 

Reports and Recommendations ("R&R") concerning the disposition of R&D Film 

1, LLC's ("Plaintiff') Complaint in these cases. The R&Rs recommended 

dismissing these actions without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 

Procedure 4(m) for failure to timely effect service of process. 

The R&Rs notified the parties of their right to file objections to the R&Rs 

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). 

The R&Rs further specifically advised the parties that the failure to object to the 

R&Rs within fourteen days would result in a waiver of the right to de novo review 

by the District Judge and waiver of the right to appeal the judgments of the 

Case: 2:12-cv-01136-MHW-EPD Doc #: 9 Filed: 10/01/13 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
District Court. Report and Recommendation 2, ECF No. 8. The deadline for 

filing such objections has passed, and no objections were filed. 

Having received no objections, the R&Rs are ADOPTED, and the cases 

are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Clerk shall enter judgment and 

terminate these cases. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

M'iCHAELH:WATSON, 

~/l!k JUDGE 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

Case: 2:12-cv-01136-MHW-EPD Doc #: 9 Filed: 10/01/13 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
#### Maddock & Miller, Inc. *v.*United States

No. 7581.

Entry No. 748190.

Invoice dated Hanley, England, March 6, 1946.

Certified March 7, 1946.

Entered at New York, N. Y., March 27, 1946.

(Decided April 27, 1948)

*Benjamin A. Levett*for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Johnson, Judge:

This proceeding has been submitted upon a stipulation wherein the parties' hereto have agreed that the issues involved in this reappraisement are the same in all material respects as in the case of *United States*v. *Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp.,*33 C. C. P. A. 183, C. A. D. 334. The record in that case was admitted as part of the record herein.

In view of the aforesaid stipulation and accepting same as a statement of fact, and in view of the decision cited, I find and hold that the export value of the merchandise is the value found by the appraiser, less any additions on entry by the importer by reason of advances by the appraiser in similar cases to equal the so-called British purchase tax.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
No. 53746.

protest 134168-K/1365 (Chicago).

#### The Phillipson Fur Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

When the case was called for trial the examiner who-passed the skins in question testified that the six skins were similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *O. Brager-Larsen*(36 C. C. P. A. 1, C. A. D. 388). The claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was therefore sustained.

Cole, J., concurring.
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-13-0004146 19-MAR-2014 08:20 AM
EXHIBIT 35.1








ANNUAL SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT PURSUANT TO ITEM 1123 OF REGULATION AB





CARMAX BUSINESS SERVICES, LLC








The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of CarMax Business Services, LLC, as Servicer pursuant to Section 3.10 of the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of February 1, 2016 (the "Sale and Servicing Agreement") among CarMax Auto Owner Trust 2016-1, as Issuer (the "Issuer"), CarMax Auto Funding LLC, as Depositor, and CarMax Business Services, LLC, as Servicer (the "Servicer"), does hereby certify that:





|   |                                                                                                              
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | CarMax Business Services, LLC is, as of the date hereof, the Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement.




|   |                                                                                      
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | The undersigned is duly authorized to execute and deliver this Officer's Certificate.




|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|3. | A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period beginning onMarch 1, 2016and ending onFebruary 28, 2017and of the Servicer's performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement was made under my supervision.  To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout such period.







Capitalized terms used in this certificate and not otherwise defined herein have the meanings assigned to them in the Sale and Servicing Agreement.





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of the Servicer, has duly executed this Officer's Certificate this 19th day of May, 2017 .





CARMAX BUSINESS SERVICES, LLC





/s/ Enrique Mayor-Mora


Enrique Mayor-Mora


Vice President and Treasurer
# C_2008234EN.01001501.xml

| 12.9.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 234/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.9.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 234/15

---

Amendment to recruitment notice PE/108/S

(Official Journal of the European Union C 145 A of 11 June 2008)

(Official Journal of the European Union C 145 A of 11 June 2008)

(2008/C 234/09)

The European Parliament published, in the Official Journal of 11 June 2008, recruitment notice PE/108/S for the post of Director (AD, grade 14) in the Directorate-General for Translation — Directorate A — Technology Support Services, in accordance with Article 29(2) of the Staff Regulations of officials of the European Communities, with 26 June 2008 set as the deadline for submission of applications.

In order to extend its range of choices, the Appointing Authority has decided to re-open the period for submission of applications. The new closing date will be 26 September 2008.

26 September 2008

The re-opening of the period for submission of applications in no way affects the situation of candidates who have already been registered.

Apart from the abovementioned change, the initial recruitment notice remains unchanged. In particular, the admission criteria continue to be those set out in that notice: anyone taking advantage of the extension of the deadline to submit their first application must ensure that they fulfilled the admission criteria on the closing date indicated in the initial recruitment notice (i.e. 26 June 2008).

the admission criteria continue to be those set out in that notice

IMPORTANT: anyone whose application has, on the date of publication of the present announcement, already been registered may not submit a second application.

IMPORTANT: anyone whose application has, on the date of publication of the present announcement, already been registered may not submit a second application.

---
# C_2017239EN.01000901.xml

| 24.7.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 239/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.7.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 239/9

---

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 10 May 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour administrative d’appel de Douai — France) — Wenceslas de Lobkowicz v Ministère des Finances et des Comptes publics

(Case C-690/15) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Officials of the European Union - Staff Regulations - Compulsory affiliation to the social security scheme of the EU institutions - Real estate income received in a Member State - Liability to pay General Social Contribution, social levy and additional contributions under the law of a Member State - Participating in the funding of the social security scheme of that Member State))

(2017/C 239/11)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Referring court

Cour administrative d’appel de Douai

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Wenceslas de Lobkowicz

Applicant:

Defendant: Ministère des Finances et des Comptes publics

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 14 of Protocol (No 7) on the privileges and immunities of the European Union, annexed to the EU, FEU and EAEC Treaties, and the provisions of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union on the joint social security scheme of the EU institutions must be interpreted as precluding national legislation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which provides that income from real estate received in a Member State by an official of the European Union who has his or her domicile for tax purposes in that Member State is subject to contributions and social levies that are allocated for the funding of the social security scheme of that same Member State.

---

(1)  OJ C 98, 14.3.2016.

1

---
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
Youhave reached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection(FDLP/EC) Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in theFDLP/EC. Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suiteof cataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications (CGP).
**Title: Newsbulletin
 
1998
2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005| 2006 | 2007
2012
 
SuDoc Number:TD 4.2:SP 1
Item Number:0431-C-08 (online)
CGP System Number:000611744
 
 
September 13, 2017**
# C_2016279EN.01000501.xml

| 1.8.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 279/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.8.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 279/5

---

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 21 April 2016 — Alexandre Borde, Carbonium SAS v European Commission

(Case C-279/15 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - Intra-ACP programme (African, Caribbean and Pacific States) of the Global Climate Change Alliance (GCCA) - European Commission’s request to terminate the mission of an expert chosen by the other contracting party - Action for annulment - Right to an effective judicial remedy))

(2016/C 279/07)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Appellants: Alexandre Borde, Carbonium SAS (represented by: A.B.H. Herzberg, Rechtsanwalt)

Appellants:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: S. Bartelt and F. Moro, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

| 2. | Mr Borde and Carbonium SAS shall pay the costs jointly and severally. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Mr Borde and Carbonium SAS shall pay the costs jointly and severally.

---

(1)  OJ C 294, 7.9.2015.

1

---
#### Bourjois, Inc. (Freedman & Slater, Inc.-Broker) *v.*United States

No. 7586.

Entry No. 702617.

Invoice dated Bombay, India, May 1944.

Certified May 1944.

Entered at New York, N. Y., July 31, 1944.

(Decided May 5, 1948)

*Siegel,. Mandell & Davidson (Sidney Mandell*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Mollison., Judge:

Tbis appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon tbe following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto .-

> It is hereby stipulated and agreed, subject to the approval of the court, that the issues in the appeal to reappraisement listed herewith are the same in all material respects as the issues decided in *United States*v. *Fritzsche Bros. Inc.,*Suit 4572, and that the record in said case may be incorporated herein.

> It is further stipulated and agreed that the entered value of the merchandise involved in the case listed herewith is equal to the price at the time of exportation of such merchandise to the United States, at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, and that the foreign value of such or similar merchandise was no higher.

> It is further'stipulated and agreed that this case may be submitted on the foregoing stipulation.

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of. the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such value was the entered value.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
# C_2016419EN.01001701.xml

| 14.11.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 419/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.11.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 419/17

---

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 21 September 2016 — European Commission v Kingdom of Spain

(Case C-140/15 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - Cohesion Fund - Reduction of financial assistance - Procedure of adoption of the decision by the European Commission - Existence of a time limit - Non-compliance with the time limit laid down - Consequences))

(2016/C 419/21)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Appellant: European Commission (represented by: S. Pardo Quintillán and D. Recchia, acting as Agents)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: Kingdom of Spain (represented by: A. Rubio González, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings:

Intervener in support of the defendant: Kingdom of the Netherlands (represented by: B. Koopman and M. Bulterman, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders the European Commission to pay the costs; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the European Commission to pay the costs;

| 3. | Orders the Kingdom of the Netherlands to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Kingdom of the Netherlands to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 155, 11.5.2015.

1

---
# C_2017070EN.01000601.xml

| 6.3.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 70/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.3.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 70/6

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 January 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Berlin — Germany) — Schaefer Kalk GmbH & Co. KG v Bundesrepublik Deutschland

(Case C-460/15) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Environment - Scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the European Union - Directive 2003/87/EC - Monitoring plan - Regulation (EU) No 601/2012 - Article 49(1) and point 10 of Annex IV - Calculation of the emissions of an installation - Subtraction of carbon dioxide (CO2) transferred - Exclusion of CO2 used in the production of precipitated calcium carbonate - Legality of the exclusion))

(2017/C 070/08)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Verwaltungsgericht Berlin

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Schaefer Kalk GmbH & Co. KG

Applicant:

Defendant: Bundesrepublik Deutschland

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The second sentence of Article 49(1) of Commission Regulation (EU) No 601/2012 of 21 June 2012 on the monitoring and reporting of greenhouse gas emissions pursuant to Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and point 10(B) of Annex IV to that regulation are invalid in so far as they systematically include the carbon dioxide (CO2) transferred to another installation for the production of precipitated calcium carbonate in the emissions of the lime combustion installation, regardless of whether or not that CO2 is released into the atmosphere.

2

2

---

(1)  OJ C 389, 23.11.2015.

1

---
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. PD-0193-11

DEVIN SHARIF BRIDGES, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

ON REHEARING OF APPELLANT’S

PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

FROM THE FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS

DALLAS COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

Appellant was convicted of murder and sentenced to confinement for life and

assessed a fine of $10,000. The Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction. Bridges v.

State, (Tex. App. — Dallas, No. 05-09-00784-CR, delivered January 31, 2011).

Appellant’s petition for discretionary review was dismissed as untimely filed on July 27,

2011. Appellant has filed a motion for rehearing requesting reinstatement of his petition
Bridges - 2

so that it will be considered by this Court. Appellant’s motion for rehearing is granted.

His petition filed in this Court on July 5, 2011, is reinstated as of November 2, 2011, and

will be considered in accord with Tex.R.App.P. 68.

Delivered November 2, 2011

Do not publish
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 241 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 241

   Designating September 2005, as ``Leukemia, Lymphoma, and Myeloma 
                           Awareness Month''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 15, 2005

 Mr. Jeffords submitted the following resolution; which was considered 
                             and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Designating September 2005, as ``Leukemia, Lymphoma, and Myeloma 
                           Awareness Month''.

Whereas blood-related cancers currently afflict more than 747,000 Americans, 
        with an estimated 114,000 new cases diagnosed each year;
Whereas leukemia, lymphoma, and myeloma will kill an estimated 54,480 people in 
        the United States this year;
Whereas the National Cancer Institute of the National Institute of Health is 
        committed to the elimination of suffering and death due to cancer by the 
        year 2015;
Whereas the Senate is similarly committed to the eradication of blood-related 
        cancers and supports the treatment of people in the United States who 
        suffer from them; and
Whereas the Senate will continue efforts to provide support at all levels for 
        research and other efforts that will lead to a complete cure for 
        leukemia, lymphoma, and myeloma: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate designates September 2005, as ``Leukemia, 
Lymphoma, and Myeloma Awareness Month'' to--
            (1) enhance the understanding of blood-related cancers;
            (2) encourage participation in voluntary activities to 
        support education programs; and
            (3) support the funding of research programs to find a cure 
        for blood-related cancers.
                                 <all>
```
Executive Order 12866 

and 

Congressional Review Requirements 

Rulemaking Documeat Title: ^^.O^^A ^ K >''^ck^' J ^" ^ ^^^^' ^ ' ^ 

With respect to the attached rulemaking document(s): 

1. E.O. 12866: The requirements of section 6(a)(3)(E) of E.O. 12866 have been met in accordance with the 

following [initial appropriate line]: 

- / 

• The rulemaking document(s) was not reviewed by the Office of Information and 

Regulatory Affairs (OIRA). 

No substantive changes were made to the document(s) after it was submitted to OlRA. 

The required information is attached. 

2. Congressional Review: The requirements of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act 

for the submission of final rules to Congress and GAO (§ 801) have been met in accordance with the 

following [initial appropriate line]: 

^^^ ^ This document is not a final rule. 

This document is not a rule under (§ 804). 

" ^ The document has been submitted to C-50 for transmission to Congress and GAO. 

^/•'\ ^ ( ' --^z 

^ 

Signature ^ 

y-l A i\ A 

Name 

Title/Office 

sUll o 

Date
# Official Journal C 487/3 De

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 487 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 643 December 2021 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 487

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 643 December 2021

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2021/C 487/01 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| 2021/C 487/02 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections | 7 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2021/C 487/01

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  )

1

1

2021/C 487/02

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections

7

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2021/C 487/03 | State aid – France – State aid SA.56399 and SA.56634 (2021/C) (ex 2020/FC)) – Octroi supposé d’aide d’État illégale à la Française des Jeux – Invitation to submit comments pursuant to Article 108(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (
  1
  ) | 13 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2021/C 487/03

State aid – France – State aid SA.56399 and SA.56634 (2021/C) (ex 2020/FC)) – Octroi supposé d’aide d’État illégale à la Française des Jeux – Invitation to submit comments pursuant to Article 108(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (
  1
  )

1

13

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN