alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2016305EN.01001001.xml

| 22.8.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 305/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.8.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 305/10

---

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 16 June 2016 — European Commission v Portuguese Republic

(Case C-200/15) (1)

1

((Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Article 110 TFEU - Internal taxation - Discriminatory taxation - Second-hand motor vehicles imported from other Member States - Determination of their taxable value - Depreciation rate))

(2016/C 305/14)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: M. Wasmeier and P. Guerra e Andrade, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Portuguese Republic (represented by: L. Inez Fernandes, A. Cunha, A. Brigas Afonso and N. da Silva Vitorino, Agents)

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that, in applying, in order to determine the taxable value of second-hand vehicles imported into Portugal from another Member State, a system for calculating the depreciation on the vehicles which does not take account of the depreciation on the vehicles during their first year of use or of depreciation of more than 52 % in the case of vehicles which have been used for more than five years, the Portuguese Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 110 TFEU; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, in applying, in order to determine the taxable value of second-hand vehicles imported into Portugal from another Member State, a system for calculating the depreciation on the vehicles which does not take account of the depreciation on the vehicles during their first year of use or of depreciation of more than 52 % in the case of vehicles which have been used for more than five years, the Portuguese Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 110 TFEU;

| 2. | Orders the Portuguese Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Portuguese Republic to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 205, 22.6.2015.

1

---
## In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

________________________ No. 07 - 15 - 00411 - CR

________________________ THE STATE OF TEXAS , APPELLANT

V. JIMMIE MARK WHITE , APPELLEE On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2

Potter County, Texas Trial Court No. 140, 075 - 2 ; Honorable Pamela Cook Sirmon , Presiding November 17 , 2015 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ. Pending before this c ourt is a Motion to Dismiss filed by Appellant, the State of Te xas, in which the State requests dismissal of its appeal. 1 No decision of this c ourt having been delivered, the motion is granted and the appeal is dismissed. T EX . R. A PP .

1 The State filed a document indicating its intent to appeal a Judgment of Deferred Disposition “or in the alternative to seek a writ of mandamus concerning the same.” This court has construed the State’s filing as a notice of appeal. If the State wishes to seek a writ of mandamus, it must fi le an original proceeding in accordance with Rule 52 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure.2

P. 42.2(a). No motion for rehearing will be e ntertained and our mandate will issue forthwith. Patrick A. Pirtle Justice Do not publish.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15

- 10080 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
SERGIO CHAVARRIA DELGADO , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:13

- CR

- 119

- 1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DENNIS, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Sergio Chavarria Delgado raises an argument that is foreclosed by United States v. Alcantar , 733 F.3d 143, 145

- 46 (5th Cir. 2013). In Alcantar , we rejected the argument that Nat’l Fed’n of Indep. Bus. v. Sebelius , 132 S. Ct. 2566 (2012) ( NFIB ), affected our prior jurisprudence rejecting challenges to the constitutionality of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). 733 F.3d at 146. Because 18 U.S.C. § 922(j) is substantially similar

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances se t forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED October 22 , 2015

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 15-10080 Document: 00513241698 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/22/2015No. 15

- 10080

2 to § 922(g), the same result is reached with re spect to Delgado’s challenge to
it. See United States v. Luna , 165 F.3d 316, 319 (5th Cir. 1999). As Delgado acknowledges, his challenge to § 922(g)(1) and (j) is foreclosed by our jurisprudence, and, as explained in Alcantar , NFIB does not change this r esult. The Government’s unopposed motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, its alternate motion for extension of time is DENIED, and the judgment of the
district court is AFFIRMED. Case: 15-10080 Document: 00513241698 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/22/2015
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 80 (Thursday, April 26, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 20846]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-7988]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP07-325-000]


Equitrans, L.P.; Notice of Technical Conference

April 20, 2007.
    Take notice that the Commission will convene a technical conference 
in the above referenced proceeding on Friday, May 4, 2007, at 10 a.m. 
(EDT), in a room to be designated at the offices of the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The Commission's March 29, 2007 order \1\ directed that a technical 
conference be held to address the issues raised by a March 1, 2007 
filing of Equitrans, L.P. (Equitrans) to institute a surcharge to 
recover certain costs incurred by Equitrans under the Pipeline Safety 
Improvement Act of 2002 (PSIA).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Equitrans, L.P., 118 FERC ] 61,258 (2007).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The parties and the Commission Staff will have the opportunity to 
discuss all of the issues raised by the filing including, but not 
limited to, the validity of the costs Equitrans seeks to recover and 
the underlying support for these costs.
    FERC conferences are accessible under section 508 of the 
Rehabilitation Act of 1973. For accessibility accommodations please 
send an e-mail to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#711012121402021813181d18050831171403125f161e07"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="2f4e4c4c4a5c5c464d4643465b566f494a5d4c01484059">[email protected]</span></a> or call toll free (866) 208-
3372 (voice) or 202-502-8659 (TTY), or send a fax to 202-208-2106 with 
the required accommodations.
    All interested persons are permitted to attend. For further 
information please contact Lisa T. Long by phone at (202) 502-8691 or 
via e-mail at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a0ccc9d3c18ecccfcec7e0c6c5d2c38ec7cfd6"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="2e42475d4f00424140496e484b5c4d00494158">[email protected]</span></a>.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-7988 Filed 4-25-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
No. 45172.

#### Protests 45675-K, etc., of B. Dorman et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of *Locatelli*v. *United States*(T. D. 48284) it was held that an allowance of 2)4 percent should have been made in the weight of the cheese to compensate for the inedible coverings.
No. 47557.

#### Protests 844298-G (B), etc., of P. Alonge & Bros. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
# Official Journal L 100/2014

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 100 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 573 April 2014 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 100

English edition

Legislation

Volume 573 April 2014

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 342/2014 of 21 January 2014 supplementing Directive 2002/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to regulatory technical standards for the application of the calculation methods of capital adequacy requirements for financial conglomerates (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| | | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 343/2014 of 2 April 2014 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables | 10 |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Council Decision 2014/183/CFSP of 1 April 2014 on the launch of a European Union military operation in the Central African Republic (EUFOR RCA) | 12 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 342/2014 of 21 January 2014 supplementing Directive 2002/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to regulatory technical standards for the application of the calculation methods of capital adequacy requirements for financial conglomerates (
  1
  )

1

1

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 343/2014 of 2 April 2014 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

10

DECISIONS

*

Council Decision 2014/183/CFSP of 1 April 2014 on the launch of a European Union military operation in the Central African Republic (EUFOR RCA)

12

| | | Corrigenda |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | * | Corrigendum to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1001/2013 of4 October 2013 amending Annex I toCouncil Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 on the tariff and statisticalnomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff ( OJ L 290,31.10.2013 ) | 13 |

Corrigenda

*

Corrigendum to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1001/2013 of4 October 2013 amending Annex I toCouncil Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 on the tariff and statisticalnomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff ( OJ L 290,31.10.2013 )

( OJ L 290,31.10.2013 )

13

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Before the Third Division,

June 9, 1945

No. 50243.

#### Protest 43000-K of Columbia Co. (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as that passed upon in Abstract 42516. In accordance therewith the claim at 20 percent under paragraph 1558 was sustained.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In Connection with the Quarterly Report of Tower Properties Company (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Stanley
J. Weber, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
            15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

/s/ Stanley J. Weber
--------------------
Stanley J. Weber
Chief Financial Officer
May 16, 2005
No. 41969.

#### Protest 577631-G of New York Merchandise Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of photo frames, trays, tray sets, candlesticks, and vases chiefly used in the household for utilitarian purposes. The claim at 50 percent under paragraph 339 was therefore sustained.
(Reap. Dec. 9359)

#### Plywood & Door Northern Corporation *v.*United States

Entry Nos. 870455-1/2; 881273.

(Decided March 23, 1959)

*Jernes Wilson Young*for the plaintiff.

*George Coohran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Mollison, Judge:

The above-entitled appeals for reappraisement have been submitted for decision upon a stipulation of counsel for the parties on the agreed facts in which I find that the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise involved is foreign value, as defined in section 402(c), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and that such value, as to the merchandise set forth in schedule “A,” attached hereto, is the appraised value, less 4 per centum, net, packed, and as to the merchandise set forth in schedule “B,” also attached hereto, is the appraised value, less 9 per centum, net, packed.

Judgment will issue accordingly.

Schedule “A”

Collector’s Court No. No. Entry No. Date of export

R58/17271 06217 870455-J4 1/22/57

Birch plywood as follows:

BJ/BB grade, thick, 72" x 48"

60" x 48"

48" x 48"

R58/17273 06219 881273 1/30/57

Birch plywood as follows:

BJ/BB grade, *%"*thick, 60" x 60"

61" x 61"

59" x 59"

58" x 58"

*571Schedule “B”

Reappraise- Collector’s Datelof

ment No. No. Entry No. export

R58/17271 06217 870455-1/2 1/22/57

Birch plywood as follows:

BJ/BB grade, *ft"*thick, 36" x 48"
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6970

LARRY HAMILTON, JR.,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

WASHINGTON COUNTY DETENTION CENTER; VAN EVANS, Major; 

CICCARELLI, Dr.; DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; O. WAYNE HILL, 

Warden; CARROLL PARRISH, Asst. Warden; O. WILLIAMS, R.N.; 

DIVISION OF CORRECTIONS; PRIME MEDICAL CARE,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, District Judge. 

(8:09-cv-00516-RWT; 8:09-cv-00722-RWT)

Submitted: October 22, 2010 Decided: November 12, 2010

Before SHEDD, AGEE, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Larry Hamilton, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Rodger Owen Robertson, 

LAW OFFICE OF JOSEPH M. JAGIELSKI, Baltimore, Maryland; David J. 

McManus, Jr., BAXTER, BAKER, SIDLE, CONN & JONES, PA, Baltimore, 

Maryland; Glenn William Bell, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF 

MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Larry Hamilton, Jr., appeals the district court’s 

order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. 

Appellee Evans has moved to dismiss, arguing Hamilton’s notice 

of appeal was untimely. We deny Evans’s motion. We have 

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, 

we affirm the district court’s order. Hamilton v. Washington 

Cty. Det. Ctr., Nos. 8:09-cv-00516-RWT; 8:09-cv-00722-RWT (D. 

Md. May 26, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000100030
<NAME> TRW INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                             609
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,684
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      1,048
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,768
<PP&E>                                           7,915
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,999
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  17,341
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,622
<BONDS>                                          5,661
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            76
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,580
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    17,341
<SALES>                                          7,882
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 7,882
<CGS>                                            6,558
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,558
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 185
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    224
<INCOME-TAX>                                       113
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                111
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       111
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .92
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .91


</TABLE>
ipii_ex481.htm

EXHIBIT 4.81
  
 Extension of Debenture Maturity Date
  
 TO Intellipharmaceutics International Inc. (the "Company")
  
 RE: Debenture dated November 15, 2019, for a face amount of US $250,000 issued by the Company to Isa Odidi and Amina Odidi (the "Debenture") and the Maturity Date (as defined in the Debenture and as extended from time to time) of such Debenture
  
 The undersigned hereby agree that the current Maturity Date of the Debenture (currently July 31, 2021) is extended to October 31, 2021. 
  
 DATED as of July 31, 2021.
  
 	/s/ Isa Odidi 	 	 	/s/ Amina Odidi	 
	Isa Odidi  	 	 	Amina Odidi
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 16-4238

___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

Zibo Li

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the District of Minnesota - St. Paul

____________

 Submitted: September 29, 2017

Filed: October 4, 2017

[Unpublished]

____________

Before GRUENDER, BENTON, and KELLY, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.

Zibo Li was found guilty by a jury of conspiracy to traffic in unauthorized

access devices, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371, and two counts of possessing

unauthorized access devices, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1029(a)(3), (c)(1)(A)(i). 

Counsel appeals in a brief filed under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967),

challenging the sufficiency of the evidence and the constitutionality of the sentence
imposed by the district court. Having jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, this court

1

affirms. 

The evidence at trial included the testimony of cooperating witnesses who

participated at various levels in a scheme that involved selling fraudulently obtained

cellular telephonesfor a profit. Testimony established that law enforcement officials

searched Li’s home and seized unauthorized access devices and other incriminating

evidence afterintercepting boxes containing fraudulentlyobtained cellular telephones

sent by Li from Minnesota bound for Hong Kong. This evidence was sufficient to

support the jury verdict, notwithstanding Li’s denial of knowledge of the fraudulent

means used by others to obtain the cellular telephones. See 18 U.S.C. § 1029(a)(3)

(possession of unauthorized access devices); United States v. Jenkins-Watts, 574 F.3d

950, 959-60 (8th Cir. 2009) (standard of review and required proof for conspiracy

conviction). Li’s due process rights were not violated by the district court’s

application of a preponderance-of-the-evidence standard in sentence enhancements. 

See United States v. Mustafa, 695 F.3d 860, 862 (8th Cir. 2012) (per curiam). 

This court finds no nonfrivolous issues after reviewing the record in

accordance with Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988). 

The judgment is affirmed, and counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted.

______________________________

The Honorable David S. Doty, United States District Judge for the District of 1

Minnesota.

-2-
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 9354 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make certain temporary 

provisions relating to the child tax credit permanent, to make such 

credit fully refundable, and to increase the corporate tax rate. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 13, 2024 

Ms. PORTER (for herself, Ms. PRESSLEY, and Mrs. RAMIREZ) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make 

certain temporary provisions relating to the child tax 

credit permanent, to make such credit fully refundable, 

and to increase the corporate tax rate. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Single Parent Penalty 

5 Elimination Act of 2024’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 9354 IH

1 SEC. 2. INCREASE IN CHILD TAX CREDIT. 

2 (a) AMOUNT OF CREDIT INCREASED.—Section 24(a) 

3 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by strik4 ing ‘‘$1,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$2,000’’. 

5 (b) REPEAL OF LIMITATIONS.—Section 24 of such 

6 Code is amended by striking subsection (b). 

7 (c) CREDIT MADE FULLY REFUNDABLE.—Section 

8 24(d) of such Code is amended to read as follows: 

9 ‘‘(d) CREDIT REFUNDABLE.—So much of the credit 

10 allowed to a taxpayer under subsection (a) as is deter11 mined without regard to subsection (h) shall be treated 

12 as a credit allowed to such taxpayer under subpart C.’’. 

13 (d) REPEAL ON CERTAIN SPECIAL RULES FOR TAX14 ABLE YEARS 2018 THROUGH 2025.—Section 24(h) of 

15 such Code is amended by striking paragraphs (2), (3), (5), 

16 and (6). 

17 (e) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

18 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

19 December 31, 2023. 

20 SEC. 3. INCREASE IN CORPORATE TAX RATE. 

21 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 11(b) of the Internal Rev22 enue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ‘‘21 percent’’ 

23 and inserting ‘‘28 percent’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 9354 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

3 December 31, 2024. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS