alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 99.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of Consumers Financial
Corporation  (the  "Company")  for the period ended June 30, 2002, as filed with
the  Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, R.
Fredric  Zullinger, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act  of  2002,  that,  to  the  best  of  my  knowledge, information and belief:

     (1)  The  Report  fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or
          15  (d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents, in all
          material respects, the Company's net assets in liquidation and changes
          in  net  assets  in  liquidation.




Date  August  13,  2002                 By  /S/   R. Fredric  Zullinger
      -----------------                     ------------------------------------
                                            R.  Fredric  Zullinger
                                            Chief  Financial  Officer


Consumers  Financial  Corporation                                        Page 19
Form  10-Q                                                       June  30,  2002
<PAGE>
Page 1 of 3

Disposition Comments

Docket No: FAA-2013-0555 These comments are in

Directorate ID: 2010-SW-047-AD response to an SNPRM

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

Next Step: FRAN SNPRM

 No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received – If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required.

No Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes, 

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don’t agree because 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD:
Page 2 of 3

If NO, we don’t agree because 

For additional issues, double-click here
Page 3 of 3

Signature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

ASE Printed Name: Date

Branch Manager Date
#### Rohner Gehrig & Co., Inc. *v.*United States

No. 7418.

Invoice dated London, England, May 1943.

Certified May 1943.

Entered at New York, N. Y., July 6, 1943.

Entry No. 700400.

(Decided October 24, 1947)

*Siegel, Mandell & Davidson*for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Bao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Mollison, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
# C_2008165EN.01001301.xml

| 28.6.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 165/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.6.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 165/13

---

Call for proposals for the ESPON 2013 Operational Programme

(2008/C 165/07)

Under the ESPON 2013 Programme 3 calls for proposals will be launched on 20 August 2008.

Please visit: www.espon.eu regularly for further information.

---
# Official Journal L 334/20 D

| | ISSN 1725-2555 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 334 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 4820 December 2005 |

ISSN 1725-2555

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 334

English edition

Legislation

Volume 4820 December 2005

---

| Contents | | I   Acts whose publication is obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | |
| | * | Regulation (EC) No 2046/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 December 2005 relating to measures envisaged to facilitate the procedures for applying for and issuing visas for members of the Olympic family taking part in the 2006 Olympic and/or Paralympic Winter Games in Turin | 1 |

Contents

I   Acts whose publication is obligatory

page

*

Regulation (EC) No 2046/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 December 2005 relating to measures envisaged to facilitate the procedures for applying for and issuing visas for members of the Olympic family taking part in the 2006 Olympic and/or Paralympic Winter Games in Turin

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Case: 2:12-cv-01187-EAS-EPD Doc #: 52 Filed: 11/15/13 Page: 1 of 1  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-11T19:54:23-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Commercial Mortgage  Servicing**D1050-084, 8th Fl  401 South Tryon Street.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|--------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

Reference is hereby made tothat certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of May 1, 2016, by andamong Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc., as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, NationalAssociation, as Master Servicer, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC as SpecialServicer, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Certificate Administrator,Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee and Park Bridge Lender ServicesLLC, as Operating Advisor and Asset Representations Reviewer with respect toCommercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2016-C29 (the"Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise definedshall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 11.09 ofthe Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial MortgageServices do hereby certify that:

 

1. A review of the activitiesof the Master Servicer during the period from May 1, 2016 through December 31,2016 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance per theAgreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and 

 

2. To the best of myknowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer, has fulfilled all of itsobligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

 

 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, theundersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2017.

 

 

/s/ Daniel Bober

Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President

Wells Fargo Bank

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll  go far |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------|
1 

 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

 FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

 EASTERN DIVISION 

DAVID C. JOHNSON, 

 Plaintiff, 

vs. Civil Action 2:12-cv-0100 

 Judge Frost 

 Magistrate Judge King 

CITY OF PATASKALA, 

 Defendant. 

 

 ORDER 

 This case was originally referred to the December 2012 Settlement 

Week. Preliminary Pretrial Order, Doc. No. 7; Notice of Hearing, 

Doc. No. 11. Upon the parties’ joint motion, the case was thereafter 

referred to the March 2013 Settlement Week. Order, Doc. No. 13; 

Notice of Hearing, Doc. No. 14. This matter is now before the Court 

on the parties’ second joint motion to continue the referral of the 

case to Settlement Week. Doc. No. 16. 

In their motion, the parties represent that discovery is on-going 

and suggest that the depositions of fact witnesses will not be 

completed prior to the scheduled March 2013 Settlement Week mediation. 

The parties specifically ask that the case be referred to the June 

2013 Settlement Week. 

All non-expert discovery is to be completed by February 28, 2013 

and motions for summary judgment are due no later than April 15, 2013. 

Preliminary Pretrial Order, Doc. No. 7. It is not clear to the Court 

why the case cannot be effectively mediated during the March 2013 

Settlement Week. Moreover, it is unlikely that any motion for summary 

Case: 2:12-cv-00100-GLF-NMK Doc #: 17 Filed: 02/05/13 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
2 

judgment will have been resolved by the June Settlement Week, a fact 

that militates against referral of the case to the June 2013 

Settlement Week. Nevertheless, the Court will not require the 

parties, or the volunteer mediator assigned to the March Settlement 

Week, to engage in what the parties apparently believe would be an 

exercise in futility. 

The parties’ joint motion to vacate the March 2013 Settlement 

Week, Doc. No. 16, is therefore GRANTED. The Clerk shall notify the 

assigned mediator. 

However, the Court will not refer the case to the June 2013 

Settlement Week. 

February 5, 2013 s/Norah McCann King_______ 

 Norah McCann King 

 United States Magistrate Judge

Case: 2:12-cv-00100-GLF-NMK Doc #: 17 Filed: 02/05/13 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                            JUN-30-2000
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                       913,955
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                      913,955
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                        913,955
<EQUITIES>                                     308
<MORTGAGE>                                       0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                    0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                             914,263
<CASH>                                      25,660
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                          51,020
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                      22,687
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           1,340,472
<POLICY-LOSSES>                            276,410
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                        249,300
<POLICY-OTHER>                                   0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                            0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                             33,750
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                   414,798
<OTHER-SE>                                 284,609
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             1,340,472
<PREMIUMS>                                 407,334
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                         25,477
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                          (4,998)
<OTHER-INCOME>                                   0
<BENEFITS>                                 363,010
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                 45,762
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                        13,932
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,012
<INCOME-TAX>                                (5,603)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          8,615
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                 8,615
<EPS-BASIC>                                 .100
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 .100
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                   0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                              0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                               0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                 0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                  0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                          0


</TABLE>
# Attachment 1

SFP Request SituationWednesday 07/30/14

– T

- 05 , a P2V, went out of service at Hill AFB, UT for a fuel seep on the RH wing. I c alled the Helena FSDO at approximately 13:00 to discuss obtaining a SFP and a ttempted to speak with five different principal inspectors with no success. I then a ttempted to contact the FSDO maintenance supervisor and manager with no

success. The only thing I could do is to leave numerous voice mails and send texts asking to be co ntacted. I finally

e stablished contact with a maintenance inspector at 15:00 and was told I would need to contact the Salt Lake City FSDO for a SFP. I explained that the Helena FSDO is our Part 137 Certificate Holding District Office and had been delegat ed authority by other FSDO’s in the past to issue the SFP due to our unique mission and methods of operating. He said that by the 8900.1 I had to go through The SLC FSDO

.

I contacted the SLC FSDO only to end up having to leave a voicemail for the on

- dut y maintenance inspector. I tried to stress the importance of being able to move T

- 05 to Missoula in light of our mission. I was not called back until 15:5 5 and was told I would be able to get a permit the next day. I explained again the mission of this aircraft and that I would lose the flight crew that evening due to the next day being their contract day off. The inspector reluctantly agreed to help if it could be done by 16:30. Just after speaking with the SLC inspector, the Helena FSDO manager along with the maintenance inspector I had spoken with earlier called. The manager had been able to speak with the SLC manager and got permission to issue the SFP. With that I sent the complete d application via email and got the permit at 16:46. I then
notif ied the SLC in spector that the Helena FSDO had been given authority to issue the permit.

In this instance, we were able to obtain a SFP in the last moments of FSDO availability and move T

- 05 to our maintenance facility for a repair that we could not per form in the field.

We encounter other situations during the wildfire season where the ideal thing to do would be to ferry the aircraft to one of our maintenance facilities, but we find ourselves needing a SFP after FSDO normal hours. In these situations , w e most commonly take one of two following options to repair the aircraft:

1. Based on distance and weight/bulk/size of needed repair parts, test equipment, and required personnel, one or
more trucks are loaded and sent to the aircraft

. 2. Again, based on dis tance and the ability to fit the needed parts, equipment, and personnel in our King Air or Falcon 10, we launch an aircraft to the tanker.

While these solutions do work, they are expensive and time consuming, but an AOG tanker loses a great deal of
availa bility time and is a critical resource that is not available to the incident commanders that rely heavily on the LAT
fleet.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 79 (Wednesday, April 25, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 20520]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-7800]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL05-60-002]


PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.; Notice of Filing

April 18, 2007.
    Take notice that on April 10, 2007, PJM Interconnection, LLC filed 
an amendment to its October 17, 2005 compliance filing, pursuant to the 
Commission's September 15, 2006 order.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. 
Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of 
that document on the Applicant and all the parties in this proceeding.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#fcbab9aebfb39290959299af898c8c938e88bc9a998e9fd29b938a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="86c0c3d4c5c9e8eaefe8e3d5f3f6f6e9f4f2c6e0e3f4e5a8e1e9f0">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on May 1, 2007.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E7-7800 Filed 4-24-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
No. 53735.

protests 770271-G, etc. (Baltimore).

#### E. Kahn & Co. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

For the reasons stated in *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C. D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 7
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                         1,097,174
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                        1,097,174
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                          1,097,174
<EQUITIES>                                       1,127
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                               1,098,301
<CASH>                                         179,499
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                              64,850
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                          14,559
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,605,016
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                351,590
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                            240,840
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                123,750
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       461,993
<OTHER-SE>                                     356,714
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,605,016
<PREMIUMS>                                     578,890
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                             55,791
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                              17,837
<OTHER-INCOME>                                       0
<BENEFITS>                                     424,696
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                     37,181
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                            19,802
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                162,809
<INCOME-TAX>                                    56,583
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            106,226
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   106,226
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.60
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.27
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>