alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 93 (Friday, May 13, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28001-28002]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-11768]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Docket ID: DOD-2011-OS-0051]

Privacy Act of 1974; System of Records

AGENCY: Defense Information Systems Agency, DoD.

ACTION: Notice to delete a system of records.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Defense Information Systems Agency is deleting a system of 
records notice in its existing inventory of record systems subject to 
the Privacy Act of 1974, (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended.

DATES: This proposed action will be effective without further notice on 
June 13, 2011 unless comments are received which result in a contrary 
determination.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by dock number and/RIN 
number and title, by any of the following methods:
     Federal Rulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov 
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Mail: Federal Docket Management System Office, 1160 
Defense Pentagon, OSD Mailroom 3C843, Washington, DC 20301-1160.
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name 
and docket number or Regulatory Information Number (RIN) for this 
Federal Register document. The general policy for comments and other 
submissions from members of the public is to make these submissions 
available for public viewing on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov as they are received without change, including any 
personal identifiers or contact information.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Jeanette M. Weathers-Jenkins at 
(703) 681-2103, or Defense Information Systems Agency, 5600 Columbia 
Pike, Room 933-I, Falls Church, VA 22041-2705.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Defense Information Systems Agency 
systems of records notice subject to the Privacy Act of 1974, (5 U.S.C. 
552a), as amended, have been published in the Federal Register and are 
available from the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT address above.
    The Defense Information Systems Agency proposes to delete a system 
of records notice from its inventory of record systems subject to the 
Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended. The proposed deletion 
is not within the purview of subsection (r) of the Privacy Act of 1974, 
(5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended, which requires the submission of a new or 
altered system report.

[[Page 28002]]

    Dated: May 9, 2011.
Morgan F. Park,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
Deletion:
K890.09
    Enterprise Data and Global Exchange (EDGE) Knowledge Management 
Portal (March 21, 2006, 71 FR 14187).
    Reason: Enterprise Data and Global Exchange (EDGE) Knowledge 
Management Portal has been replaced with DISA INTRANET Services.
[FR Doc. 2011-11768 Filed 5-12-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
```
# C_2007315EN.01002902.xml

| 22.12.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 315/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.12.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 315/29

---

Action brought on 31 October 2007 — Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Spain

(Case C-480/07)

(2007/C 315/49)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: K. Simonsson and R.Vidal Puig, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Kingdom of Spain

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | to declare that, by failing to develop, approve and implement waste reception and handling plans for all its ports, the Kingdom of Spain has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 5(1) and 16(1) of Directive 2000/59/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 November 2000 on port reception facilities for ship-generated waste and cargo residues; |
| --- | --- |

—

to declare that, by failing to develop, approve and implement waste reception and handling plans for all its ports, the Kingdom of Spain has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 5(1) and 16(1) of Directive 2000/59/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 November 2000 on port reception facilities for ship-generated waste and cargo residues;

1

| — | to order the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

to order the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

It is apparent from a combined reading of Articles 5(1) and 16(1) of Directive 2000/59 that the Kingdom of Spain was required to adopt, before 28 December 2002, the provisions necessary to ensure the development and implementation of a suitable waste reception and handling plan for every Spanish port.

It is evident from the information supplied up until that date by the Spanish authorities that waste reception and handling plans have been developed and implemented for all the ports of general interest owned by the State and the ports under the jurisdiction of the Autonomous Community of Galicia. By contrast, it is apparent from that information that such plans have not yet been developed and/or approved in respect of all the ports subject to the jurisdiction of one of the remaining coastal autonomous communities, namely, Catalonia, the Balearics, Valencia, Murcia, Andalusia, the Canaries, Asturias, Cantabria and the Basque country.

---

(1)  OJ 2000 L 332, p. 81.

1

---
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Regency
Affiliates, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Neil N. Hasson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as
      of the dates presented and the consolidated result of operations of the
      Company for the periods presented.

Dated: October 4, 2007


/s/ Neil N. Hasson
-----------------------
Neil N. Hasson
Chief Financial Officer
III 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 211 

Designating August 19, 2005, as ‘‘National Dyspraxia Awareness Day’’ and 

expressing the sense of the Senate that all Americans should be more 

informed of dyspraxia. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 26, 2005 

Ms. LANDRIEU submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Designating August 19, 2005, as ‘‘National Dyspraxia 

Awareness Day’’ and expressing the sense of the Senate 

that all Americans should be more informed of dyspraxia. 

Whereas an estimated 1 in 20 children suffers from the developmental disorder dyspraxia; 

Whereas 70 percent of those affected by dyspraxia are male; 

Whereas dyspraxics may be of average or above average intelligence but are often behaviorally immature; 

Whereas symptoms of dyspraxia consist of clumsiness, poor 

body awareness, reading and writing difficulties, speech 

problems, and learning disabilities, though not all of 

these will apply to every dyspraxic; 
2 

•SRES 211 IS

Whereas there is no cure for dyspraxia, but the earlier a child 

is treated the greater the chance of developmental maturation; 

Whereas dyspraxics may be shunned within their own peer 

group because they do not fit in; 

Whereas most dyspraxic children are dismissed as ‘‘slow’’ or 

‘‘clumsy’’ and are therefore not properly diagnosed; 

Whereas more than 50 percent of educators have never heard 

of dyspraxia; 

Whereas education and information about dyspraxia are important to detection and treatment; and 

Whereas the Senate as an institution, and Members of the 

Senate as individuals, are in unique positions to help 

raise the public awareness about dyspraxia: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That— 

2 (1) the Senate designates August 19, 2005, as 

3 ‘‘National Dyspraxia Awareness Day’’; and 

4 (2) it is the sense of the Senate that— 

5 (A) all Americans should be more informed 

6 of dyspraxia, its easily recognizable symptoms, 

7 and its proper treatment; 

8 (B) the Secretary of Education should es9 tablish and promote a campaign in elementary 

10 and secondary schools across the Nation to en11 courage the social acceptance of dyspraxic chil12 dren; and 
3 

•SRES 211 IS

1 (C) the Federal Government has a respon2 sibility to— 

3 (i) endeavor to raise awareness about 

4 dyspraxia; 

5 (ii) consider ways to increase the 

6 knowledge of possible therapy and access 

7 to health care services for people with 

8 dyspraxia; and 

9 (iii) endeavor to inform educators on 

10 how to recognize dyspraxic symptoms and 

11 to appropriately handle this disorder. 

Æ
# C_2009014EN.01S00301.xml

| 21.1.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 14/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.1.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 14/s3

---

NOTE TO THE READER

NOTE TO THE READER

The institutions have decided no longer to quote in their texts the last amendment to cited acts.

Unless otherwise indicated, references to acts in the texts published here are to the version of those acts currently in force.

---
* Pursua nt to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED

March 3, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 03-30567

Summary Calendar

_____________________

DEBORAH E. HARMON, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

SAINT GOBAIN CONTAINERS, L.L.C., formerly known as
Ball Foster Container Company, L.L.C.

Defendant-Appellee.

__________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 00-CV-1701

_________________________________________________________________

Before JOLLY, WIENER, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Deborah Harmon filed a complaint alleging that her employer,

Saint Gobain Containers, Inc. (“SG”), discriminated against her in

violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) and the

Louisiana Employment Discrimination Law. Specifically, Harmon

argued that she was actually disabled and that SG discriminated

against her on the basis of such disability, and, in the

alternative, that she was not actually disabled, but that SG

regarded her as disabled in violation of federal and state law.1 The district cour t also found that Harmon failed to file an

administrative charge on her retaliation claim (which is necessary

to sustain a lawsuit in federal court), and thus dismissed that
claim. Harmon does not appeal this determination.

2 She also argued that SG unlawfully retaliated against her for her

complaints of its allegedly discriminatory treatment, in violation

of the ADA.

The district court, finding no genuine issue of material fact,

granted summary judgment to SG on the discrimination claim, which

Harmon now appeals. 1 Harmon also appeals three non-di spositive

motions relating to docket management and supervision of discovery.

We find, for the reasons articulated by the district court,

that Harmon was not disabled as a matter of law and that SG did not

regard her as disabled under the ADA’s definition of that term.

See 42 U.S.C. § 12102(2) (West 2004); Sutton v. United Airlines,

Inc. , 527 U.S. 471, 477-78 (1999). We also find -- to the extent

this issue is not waived by Harmon’s scant briefing of it -- that

the district court did not abuse its ample discretion in ruling on

the non-dispositive motions. S ee

, e.g.

, Andrade v. Chojnacki

, 338

F.3d 448, 454 (5th Cir. 2003). Accordingly, the judgment of the

district court is

AFFIRMED.
I support the Environmental ProtectionAgency's proposal for first-ever national emission limits for carbon pollution from newpower plants. A2007 Supreme Court ruling requires the EPA todeal with carbon polution and several states and countries are already limiting carbon emissions from power plants.

The consequence of not controllingcarbon emissions is global warming with all its adverse effects.

Margaret Goldstein Public comment May 24, 2012
[ARTICLE] 5
<TABLE>
<S>                             <C>
[PERIOD-TYPE]                   3-MOS
[FISCAL-YEAR-END]                          DEC-31-2000
[PERIOD-END]                               MAR-31-2000
[CASH]                                             228
[SECURITIES]                                         0
[RECEIVABLES]                                    93857
[ALLOWANCES]                                   (20000)
[INVENTORY]                                     289706
[CURRENT-ASSETS]                                353791
[PP&E]                                         2551434
[DEPRECIATION]                               (2115610)
[TOTAL-ASSETS]                                  961431
[CURRENT-LIABILITIES]                          1442268
[BONDS]                                              0
[PREFERRED-MANDATORY]                                0
[PREFERRED]                                       9605
[COMMON]                                        174752
[OTHER-SE]                                   (2305412)
[TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY]                    961431
[SALES]                                        1173050
[TOTAL-REVENUES]                               1173050
[CGS]                                           974230
[TOTAL-COSTS]                                   974230
[OTHER-EXPENSES]                                354680
[LOSS-PROVISION]                                     0
[INTEREST-EXPENSE]                               41110
[INCOME-PRETAX]                               (155860)
[INCOME-TAX]                                         0
[INCOME-CONTINUING]                           (155860)
[DISCONTINUED]                                       0
[EXTRAORDINARY]                                      0
[CHANGES]                                            0
[NET-INCOME]                                  (155860)
[EPS-BASIC]                                    (.01)
[EPS-DILUTED]                                    (.01)
</TABLE>
Order entered November 27, 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 13

- 01646

- CV

IN RE GREYHOUND LINES, INC ., FIRST GROUP AMERI CA, AND MARC D. HARRIS, Appellant

Mandamus from the 162nd Judicial District Court

Dallas Coun ty, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. DC

- 13

- 02930



### O RDER

The Court has before it Relator’s Petition for Writ of Mandamus. The Court requests that

Real Party in Interest and Respondent file any responses by December 10, 2013.

/s/ DOUGLAS S. LANG

JUSTICE
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 77 (Monday, April 23, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 20141-20142]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-7623]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-61,273]


Jeld-Wen Door Systems, Door Division, Chiloquin, OR; Notice of 
Termination of Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated on April 10, 2007 in response to a petition 
filed on behalf of workers of Jeld-Wen Door Systems, Door Division, 
Chiloquin, Oregon.
    This petition is a photocopy of the petition filed for this worker 
group on March 21, 2007 (TA-W-61,158). On April 5, 2007, the Department 
issued a negative determination applicable to

[[Page 20142]]

workers of Jeld-Wen Door Systems, Door Division in Chiloquin, Oregon.
    Consequently, further investigation would serve no purpose, and the 
investigation has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 12th day of April, 2007.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
 [FR Doc. E7-7623 Filed 4-20-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002**

 

I, Frederick M.Strader, as President and Chief Executive Officer of United IndustrialCorporation (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to myknowledge:

a.               theaccompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly periodended March 31, 2006 as filed with the U.S. Securities and ExchangeCommission (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

b.              theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: May 10,2006

 
| /s/ Frederick M. Strader |   |   |
|--------------------------|--------|--------|
| Frederick M. Strader     |   |   |
| Chief Executive Officer  |   |   |

 

----
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

** **

**Certification Pursuant to**

**Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934**

 

I, Scott J. Charles, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Aralez Pharmaceuticals Inc.; and

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

 
| Date:  March 31,   2016 |                            |
|----------------------------------------|---------------------------------|
|                                   | /s/ Scott J. Charles            |
|                                   | Scott J. Charles                |
|                                   | Chief Financial Officer         |
|                                   | (principal financial   officer) |

 

----
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**I, Bruce M. Zorich, Chief ExecutiveOfficer of United Components, Inc. certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form10-Q of United Components, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; 3. Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report; 4. The registrant’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controlsand procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant andhave:a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which the report is being prepared;b) Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end ofthe period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc) Disclosed in this report anychange in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case ofannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal controls over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifyingofficer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors andthe audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb) Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.Date: May9, 2006         By:   /s/ Bruce M. Zorich   Name:   Bruce M. Zorich   Title:   Chief Executive Officer
No. 49354.

#### Protest 108188-K of Accurate Millinery Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

The record showed that certain of the items in question consisted of hemp hats not blocked or trimmed and not bleached, dyed, colored, or stained, and similar in all material respects to certain items involved in *United States*v. *Armand Schwab*(30 C. C. P. A. 72, C. A. D. 218), which record was admitted herein. In accordance therewith the claim at only 25 percent under paragraph 1504 (b) (1) was sustained.
# Official Journal L 383/2021

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 383 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6428 October 2021 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 383

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6428 October 2021

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/1879 of 26 October 2021 rejecting three applications for protection of a geographical indication in accordance with Article 52(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council ‘Jambon sec de l’Île de Beauté’ (PGI), ‘Lonzo de l’Île de Beauté’ (PGI), ‘Coppa de l’Île de Beauté’ (PGI)
  (Notified under number C(2021) 7535) | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

DECISIONS

*

Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/1879 of 26 October 2021 rejecting three applications for protection of a geographical indication in accordance with Article 52(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council ‘Jambon sec de l’Île de Beauté’ (PGI), ‘Lonzo de l’Île de Beauté’ (PGI), ‘Coppa de l’Île de Beauté’ (PGI)
  (Notified under number C(2021) 7535)

(Notified under number C(2021) 7535)

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.