alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal C 264/2015

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 264 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5812 August 2015 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 264

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5812 August 2015

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2015/C 264/01 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |
| | NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES |
| 2015/C 264/02 | Competent national authorities referred to in Article 2(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1338/2001 | 2 |
| 2015/C 264/03 | Notice from the Government of the Republic of Poland concerning Directive 94/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the conditions for granting and using authorisations for the prospection, exploration and production of hydrocarbons in the ‘Poręba — Tarnawa’ area | 30 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2015/C 264/01

Euro exchange rates

1

NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES

2015/C 264/02

Competent national authorities referred to in Article 2(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1338/2001

2

2015/C 264/03

Notice from the Government of the Republic of Poland concerning Directive 94/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the conditions for granting and using authorisations for the prospection, exploration and production of hydrocarbons in the ‘Poręba — Tarnawa’ area

30

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMON COMMERCIAL POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2015/C 264/04 | Notice of initiation of an anti-dumping proceeding concerning imports of sodium cyclamate originating in the People's Republic of China, limited to Fang Da Food Additive (Shen Zhen) Limited and Fang Da Food Additive (Yang Quan) Limited | 32 |
| | OTHER ACTS |
| | European Commission |
| 2015/C 264/05 | Publication of an application pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs | 40 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMON COMMERCIAL POLICY

European Commission

2015/C 264/04

Notice of initiation of an anti-dumping proceeding concerning imports of sodium cyclamate originating in the People's Republic of China, limited to Fang Da Food Additive (Shen Zhen) Limited and Fang Da Food Additive (Yang Quan) Limited

32

OTHER ACTS

European Commission

2015/C 264/05

Publication of an application pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs

40

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
#### James A. Starck *v.*United States

No. 7409.

Invoices dated Greenfield, England, October 22, 1941, etc.

Certified October 24, 1941, etc.

Entered at Boston, Mass., November 24, 1941, etc.

Entry No. 2878, etc.

(Decided October 17, 1947)

Plaintiff not represented by counsel.

*Paul P. Bao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Presiding Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement have beenjsub-mitted for decision upon the following stipulation:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
Searched for **http://www.nwcouncil.org/fw/isab/isab98-6/**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **http://www.nwcouncil.org/fw/isab/isab98-6/**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SALVADOR LOPEZ-PENA,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 09-73297

Agency No. A098-409-071

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 11, 2013** 

Before: FERNANDEZ, TASHIMA, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges. 

Salvador Lopez-Pena, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of

the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order sustaining the Department of

Homeland Security’s appeal from an immigration judge’s decision granting his

application for cancellation of removal. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. 

FILED

FEB 13 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 09-73297

§ 1252. We dismiss the petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s discretionary determination that

Lopez-Pena failed to show exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to his

qualifying relatives. See Martinez-Rosas v. Gonzales, 424 F.3d 926, 930 (9th Cir.

2005). Lopez-Pena’s contention that the BIA applied an incorrect standard of

review is not supported by the record and does not present a colorable claim that

establishes our jurisdiction. See id.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.
Trust Agreement





Exhibit 10.1

BRIAN ROBERTS

936 West 14th Avenue

Vancouver, British Columbia

Canada V5Z 1R4

 

August 21, 2008

 

Cormac Mining Inc.

936 West 14th Avenue

Vancouver, British Columbia

Canada V5Z 1R4



Ladies and Gentlemen:


		RE:  	Trust Agreement  




     Brian Roberts holds in trust for Cormac Mining Inc., a 100% undivided interest in the following claim:


	  	  	Number of  	Date of  
	Tenure No.  	Document Description  	Cells  	Expiration  
	523368  	Sack  	12  	December 2, 2008  




     Brian Roberts will deliver full title on demand to Cormac Mining Inc. for as long as the claims are in good standing with the Province of British Columbia.

 


		Yours truly,  
		  
		  
		BRIAN ROBERTS  
		Brian Roberts
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra,

 Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

April 23, 2012 

d0416 

Order 

 

April 23, 2012 

142923(54) 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 142923 

 COA: 295444 

Emmet CC: 09-003137-FC 

MICHAEL SHAWN JARVIS, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s September 

28, 2011 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order 

was entered erroneously. 

 MARILYN KELLY, J., would grant the motion for reconsideration.
Case No. 9,204.

#### The MARY COE.

[6 Adm. Rec. 440.]

District Court, S. D. Florida.

Jan. 5, 1860.

Salvage — Compensation— Amount.

[Cited in Baker v. The Slobodna, 35 Fed. 542.)

[This was a libel for salvage by John Barthun and others against the cargo and materials of the bark Mary Coe.]

Miner Bethel, for libellants.

S. J. Douglas, for respondent.

MARVIN, District Judge.

This cause having been heard upon the proofs and allegations of the parties, it is now ordered, and decreed, that the schooner Flying Arrow, recover for saving two hundred and ninety nine bales of cotton, from said wreck, valued at thirteen thousand one hundred and fifty six dollars, the sum of three thousand two hundred and eighty nine dollars, and also twenty nine dollars for saving portions of the materials and stores of said vessel, and also five hundred and ninety one dollars and sixty cents, for saving 07 bales of wet cotton, and breaking out seventy three other bales afterwards saved by the Texas. That the smacks Pinkney and Dudley, recover for saving one hundred and thirty one bales valued at five thousand seven hundred and sixty four dollars, the sum of fourteen hundred and forty one dollars, and also ten dollars and twenty eight cents for saving portions of the stores and materials. That the smack Welcome recover for saving twenty four bales, valued at one thousand and fifty six dollars, two hundred and sixty four dollars, and also ten dollars and ninety seven cents for saving portions of the materials and stores. That the schooner Eliza Catherine, recover for saving thirty nine bales and a half, valued at seven hundred and sixty five dollars and twenty five cents, the sum of three hundred and six dollars and ten cents. That the Sarah and Julia, recover for saving two bales, nineteen dollars. That the sloop Texas recover for saving seventy three bales valued at fourteen hundred and twenty three dollars and fifty cents, the sum of four hundred and ninety six dollars and forty cents, and sixty eight dollars and fourteen cents for saving portions of the materials. That the schooner Florida recover for saving materials fifty eight dollars and thirty five cents, — the total salvage on the cotton being six thousand four hundred and seven dollars and ten cents, and the total salvage on the materials, one hundred and seventy six dollars an'd seventy four cents. That upon the payment of the salvage and expenses as aforesaid, the Marshal restore said cotton and proceeds of the materials sold, to the master thereof, for and on account of whom it may concern.
121 STAT. 1802 PUBLIC LAW 110–141—DEC. 19, 2007 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 4118: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 153 (2007): 

Dec. 4, considered and passed House. 

Dec. 6, considered and passed Senate. 

WEEKLY COMPILATION OF PRESIDENTIAL DOCUMENTS, Vol. 43 (2007): 

Dec. 19, Presidential remarks. 

Æ 

Public Law 110–141 

110th Congress 

An Act 

To exclude from gross income payments from the Hokie Spirit Memorial Fund 

to the victims of the tragic event at Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. EXCLUSION FROM INCOME FOR PAYMENTS FROM THE 

HOKIE SPIRIT MEMORIAL FUND. 

For purposes of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, gross 

income shall not include any amount received from the Virginia 

Polytechnic Institute & State University, out of amounts transferred 

from the Hokie Spirit Memorial Fund established by the Virginia 

Tech Foundation, an organization organized and operated as 

described in section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, 

if such amount is paid on account of the tragic event on April 

16, 2007, at such university. 

SEC. 2. MODIFICATION OF PENALTY FOR FAILURE TO FILE PARTNERSHIP RETURNS. 

For any return of a partnership required to be filed under 

section 6031 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 for a taxable 

year beginning in 2008, the dollar amount in effect under section 

6698(b)(1) of such Code shall be increased by $1. 

Approved December 19, 2007. 

26 USC 6698 

note. 

Dec. 19, 2007 

[H.R. 4118]
Case No. 13,935.

#### In re THOMPSON.

[2 Ben. 166; 11 N. B. R. 323 (Quarto, 65).]

District Court, S. D. New York.

Feb., 1868.

Bankruptcy — Examination of Bankrupt — Discharge — Adjournment.

The pendency of an examination of the bankrupt is good cause for an adjournment of the proceedings, on the order to show cause why the bankrupt should not be discharged.

[Cited in Re Seabury, Case No. 12,573.)

Lin.the matter of John Thompson, a bankrupt.)

BY ISAAC DAYTON, Register:

[The order for creditors to show cause why the above bankrupt should not be discharged, being returnable on the 18th day of February, 1868, at eleven o’clock, the bankrupt with his counsel, Mr. E. More, appeared before me, and Mr. G. A. Seixas, duly appeared for the Merchant’s Exchange Bank, a creditor having duly proved his debt, and having by letter of attorney duly authorized Mr. Seix-as to appear, &c. An examination of the bankrupt, pursuant to an order of this court, is now going on before me, the same having been carried on and adjourned from day to day for several days, and having been this day continued and not concluded.

[Mr. Seixas thereupon requested that all proceedings upon the return of said order to show cause be adjourned, pending the examination of the bankrupt and others.

[Mr. More, on behalf of the bankrupt, objected to any adjournment on the ground that, unless Mr. Seixas should first enter his appearance under rule 24, it would be irregu-*1019lax to so adjourn the proceedings as to enable a creditor to enter bis appearance in opposition to the discharge at a future day.

[Mr. Seisas claimed and insisted that an adjournment of the hearing and proceedings, upon the order to show cause, necessarily operates to extend the time for a creditor to enter his appearance in opposition, and that the rights of a creditor on the adjourned day of the order to show cause, are the same in all respects as on the return day.

[The opinion of the register is, that ■ the pendency of the examination of the bankrupt constitutes good cause, under the 6th general rule, for adjourning the business of showing cause, and that such adjournment can properly be made without requiring the creditors to file an appearance under rule 24,. objecting to the discharge. I accordingly adjourned the business to a day agreed upon by the parties. The bankrupt thereupon requests me to certify my opinion to the court, which I now respectfully do.] 2

2

 [From 1 N. B. R. 323 (Quarto, 65).]

BLATCHFORD, District Judge.

The register was correct in his decision.
III 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 381 

Designating March 1, 2006, as National Sibling Connection Day. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 16, 2006 

Mr. SALAZAR (for himself, Mr. ENSIGN, Ms. LANDRIEU, Mr. AKAKA, Mr. 

JOHNSON, Mr. KERRY, and Mrs. CLINTON) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

FEBRUARY 28, 2006 

Committee discharged; considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating March 1, 2006, as National Sibling Connection 

Day. 

Whereas sibling relationships are among the longest lasting 

and most significant relationships in life; 

Whereas brothers and sisters share history, memories, and 

traditions that bind them together as family; 

Whereas it is estimated that over 65 percent of children in 

foster care have siblings, and are often separated when 

they are placed in the foster care system, adopted, or 

confronted with different kinship placements; 


rfake on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
2 

SRES 381 ATS 

Whereas children in foster care have a greater risk of emotional disturbance, difficulties in school, and problems 

with relationships than their peers; 

Whereas the separation of siblings as children causes additional grief and loss; 

Whereas organizations and private volunteers advocate for 

the preservation of sibling relationships in foster care settings and provide siblings in foster care with the opportunity to reunite; 

Whereas Camp to Belong, a nonprofit organization founded 

in 1995 by Lynn Price, heightens public awareness of the 

need to preserve sibling relationships in foster care settings and gives siblings in foster care the opportunity to 

reunite; and 

Whereas Camp to Belong has reunited over 2,000 separated 

siblings across the United States, the United States Virgin Islands, and Canada: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates March 1, 2006, as ‘‘Siblings 

3 Connection Day’’; 

4 (2) encourages the people of the United States 

5 to celebrate sibling relationships on this day; and 

6 (3) supports efforts to respect and preserve 

7 those sibling relationships that are at risk of being 

8 disrupted due to the placement of children into the 

9 foster care system. 

Æ 


rfake on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
*This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of

law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. This court generally disfavors the

citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under

the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

F I L E D

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

FEB 19 1999

PATRICK FISHER

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

KYLE WILSON FORNEY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

STATE OF OKLAHOMA; JOHN

DOE, Assistant District Attorney;

JANE DOE, Assistant District

Attorney,

Defendants - Appellees.

No. 98-6334

(D. Ct. No. CV-98-499-T)

(W.D. Okla.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before TACHA, McKAY, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel

has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material

assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th

Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

This appeal is from an order of the district court dismissing plaintiff’s pro
- 2 -

se complaint filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for failure to state a claim. 

Plaintiff argues that the district court erred in finding that his complaint did not

allege a violation of his civil rights and was frivolous.

Plaintiff filed this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging various

violations of his civil rights in connection with a pending prosecution for the

crime of false declaration to a pawn broker. Plaintiff is apparently a pre-trial

detainee in the Oklahoma County Detention Center. Insofar as the record in this

case shows, plaintiff has not yet been tried on that pending prosecution. The

magistrate judge clearly construed the complaint liberally and reviewed

thoroughly the allegations in plaintiff’s pro se complaint. We agree with the

district court that the claims asserted lack an arguable basis in law or fact and fail

to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1). 

We therefore dismiss the petition and deny the motion for leave to proceed in

forma pauperis. The appeal is dismissed.

ENTERED FOR THE COURT,

Deanell Reece Tacha

Circuit Judge
September 1, 2013

U.S Department of Transportation Docket Operations, M

- 30 West Building Ground F loor,

Room W12

- 140

1 200 New Jersey Avenue, SE. Washington, DC 20590

Re: Exemption No 8684 D , Regulatory Docket No. FAA

- 2006

- 23640

Ladies and Gentlemen:

In accordance with Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations parts 11.63 and 11.81, US Airways, Inc (US Airways) petitio ns the Administrator to amend Exemption No 8684 D to extend the expiration date of the exemption from January 31, 201 4 , to January 31, 201 6 , or other such future date as may be found acceptable. Exemption No 8684 D , as amended, grants relief from 14 CFR par t 121.619 so as to authorize ceiling and visibility values of 1000 feet and 2 statute miles.

This exemption has been used by US Airways and s everal other airlines for over 7 years with no negative impact. US Airways continues to be in compliance with the conditions of the exemption to 14 CFR part 121.619, and believes th at extending Exemption No. 8684 D , as stated, would have no adverse effect on safety.

Therefore, we respectfully request an extension of Exemption No. 8684 D for two years, or other

appropr iate regulatory relief.

US Airways suggests that good cause exists for waiving publication of notice of this petition in the Federal Register. The grant of exemption petitioned for here would not set a precedent, and the exemption would in all ways, other than the effective date, be identical to the exemption now in place. Delay in acting on the petition would be detrimental to the petitioner and to the public,

as well.

Please let me know if there is any further information you need for your review of thi s petition. Thank you for your consideration.

Sincerely

,

Captain Lyle Hogg Vice President, Flight Operations

4000 East Sky Harbor Blvd, FC

- FSS, Phoenix, AZ 85034 (480) 693

- 46 60 Fax (480) 693

- 4 936SUMMARY

US Airways, Inc. petitions for an amendment to Exemption No 8684 D to extend the expiration date of same, which permits US Airwa ys to conduct operations using lower ceiling and visibility minima. Additionally, US Airways is requesting that the FAA waive the requirement for Federal Register publication, as such a waiver does not set a precedent and will reduce the time necessary

to process this request.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

RICHARD JAMAR SEARS, JR.,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 330 MAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 29th day of September, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal, 

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, and the Application for Leave to Amend are DENIED.
# C_2016441EN.01000302.xml

| 28.11.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 441/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.11.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 441/3

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 5 October 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Hessisches Finanzgericht — Germany) — TMD Gesellschaft für transfusionsmedizinische Dienste mbH v Finanzamt Kassel II — Hofgeismar

(Case C-412/15) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Taxation - Value added tax - Directive 2006/112/EC - Exemptions for certain activities in the public interest - Article 132(1)(d) - Supplies of human organs, blood and milk - Scope - Plasma of human blood transformed and used for industrial purposes))

(2016/C 441/04)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Hessisches Finanzgericht

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: TMD Gesellschaft für transfusionsmedizinische Dienste mbH

Defendant: Finanzamt Kassel II — Hofgeismar

Operative part of the judgment

Article 132(1)(d) of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax must be interpreted to the effect that supplies of human blood which Member States are required to exempt by virtue of that provision do not include supplies of plasma obtained from human blood where that plasma is intended to be used, not for direct therapeutic purposes, but exclusively for the manufacture of medicinal products.

---

(1)  OJ C 398, 30.11.2015.

---