alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2007278EN.01000501.xml

| 21.11.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 278/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.11.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 278/5

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

20 November 2007

(2007/C 278/02)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,4785 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 162,85 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4524 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,71715 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2823 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,6408 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 92,96 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,9950 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5842 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 26,690 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 255,00 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6992 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,6870 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,4980 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 33,203 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,7650 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6657 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4525 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 11,5063 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,9433 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,1402 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 363,47 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,9651 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,9731 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3378 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 13 823,98 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,9715 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 63,746 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 36,0360 |
| THB | Thai baht | 46,548 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,4785

JPY

Japanese yen

162,85

DKK

Danish krone

7,4524

GBP

Pound sterling

0,71715

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2823

CHF

Swiss franc

1,6408

ISK

Iceland króna

92,96

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,9950

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5842

CZK

Czech koruna

26,690

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

255,00

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6992

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,6870

RON

Romanian leu

3,4980

SKK

Slovak koruna

33,203

TRY

Turkish lira

1,7650

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6657

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4525

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

11,5063

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,9433

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,1402

KRW

South Korean won

1 363,47

ZAR

South African rand

9,9651

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,9731

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3378

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

13 823,98

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,9715

PHP

Philippine peso

63,746

RUB

Russian rouble

36,0360

THB

Thai baht

46,548

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06-21-00096-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF Z.H. AND Z.H., CHILDREN

On Appeal from the 307th District Court

Gregg County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2020-1156-DR

Before Morriss, C.J., Stevens and Carter,* JJ.

______________________________________

*Jack Carter, Justice, Retired, Sitting by Assignment
2

ORDER

Our review of the Appellant’s brief in this matter indicates that it contains the identities 

of the minor children at issue in this parental-rights termination case in violation of Rule 9.8 of 

the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. Rule 9.8(b) states,

(b) Parental-Rights Termination Cases. In an appeal or an original 

proceeding in an appellate court, arising out of a case in which the termination of 

parental rights was at issue:

(1) except for a docketing statement, in all papers submitted to 

the court, including all appendix items submitted with a brief, petition, or 

motion:

(A) a minor must be identified only by an alias unless 

the court orders otherwise . . . .

TEX. R. APP. P. 9.8(b)(1)(A) (second, third, and fourth emphases added); see also TEX. R. APP. P.

9.9. The appellant’s brief contains the real names of the minor children under the Statement of 

the Case section of the brief, as well as in the Order of Termination contained in the appendix to 

the brief.

To protect the identity of the children, we hereby strike the Appellant’s brief and order 

that appellant refile his brief using only aliases for the minor children, in accordance with Rule

9.8 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. We further order that Appellant’s corrected brief 

by refiled on or before January 26, 2022. We note that this is not a license for Appellant to 

revise the substance of his brief.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

BY THE COURT

Date: January 19, 2022
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE BODY OF THE ACCOMPANYING FORM 10-Q AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                        9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                    DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                         SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                               8,955
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        47,825
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          47,825
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     111,324
<PP&E>                                               120,788
<DEPRECIATION>                                       87,381
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       199,652
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                53,343
<BONDS>                                              4,115
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             14,374
<OTHER-SE>                                           97,377
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         199,652
<SALES>                                              153,196
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     154,697
<CGS>                                                109,464
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        144,358
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     1,686
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   49
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      8,604
<INCOME-TAX>                                         2,770
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  5,834
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         5,834
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .48
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        .47


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT  32.1





Certification
of Chief Executive Officer


pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted


pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of NYFIX, Inc. for the
quarterly period ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), P. Howard Edelstein, as Chief
Executive Officer of NYFIX, Inc., hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of his knowledge the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of NYFIX,
Inc.





Dated:August
10, 2009





By:
                    /
      s
      / P. Howard EdelsteinP.
      Howard EdelsteinPresident
      and Chief Executive Officer
```

[Federal Register: November 9, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 216)]
[Notices]               
[Page 68755]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr09no10-33]                         

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS

 
Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the Kansas Advisory 
Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights (Commission), and 
the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), that a State Advisory 
Committee (SAC) orientation and planning meeting of the Kansas Advisory 
Committee to the Commission will convene by conference call at 11 a.m. 
and adjourn at approximately 12 p.m. (CST) on Thursday, December 16, 
2010. The purpose of this meeting is to provide SAC orientation and 
continue planning a civil rights project.
    This meeting is available to the public through the following toll-
free call-in number: (866) 364-7584, conference call access code number 
21264785. Any interested member of the public may call this number and 
listen to the meeting. Callers can expect to incur charges for calls 
they initiate over wireless lines, and the Commission will not refund 
any incurred charges. Callers will incur no charge for calls they 
initiate over land-line connections to the toll-free telephone number. 
Persons with hearing impairments may also follow the proceedings by 
first calling the Federal Relay Service at 1-800-977-8339 and providing 
the Service with the conference call number and contact name Farella E. 
Robinson.
    To ensure that the Commission secures an appropriate number of 
lines for the public, persons are asked to register by contacting 
Corrine Sanders of the Central Regional Office and TTY/TDD telephone 
number, by 4 p.m. on December 9, 2010.
    Members of the public are entitled to submit written comments. The 
comments must be received in the regional office by December 30, 2010. 
The address is U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, 400 State Avenue, Suite 
908, Kansas City, Kansas 66101. Comments may be e-mailed to 
frobinson@usccr.gov. Records generated by this meeting may be inspected 
and reproduced at the Central Regional Office, as they become 
available, both before and after the meeting. Persons interested in the 
work of this advisory committee are advised to go to the Commission's 
Web site, http://www.usccr.gov, or to contact the Central Regional 
Office at the above e-mail or street address.
    The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the 
rules and regulations of the Commission and FACA.

    Dated in Washington, DC, on November 4, 2010.
Peter Minarik,
Acting Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.
[FR Doc. 2010-28221 Filed 11-8-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
```
San Joaquin Valley d AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT 

January 8,2009 

Mr. James Goldstene 

Executive Officer 

California Air Resources Board 

P.O. Box 2815 

Sacramento, CA 95812 

Dear Mr. Goldstene: 

Enclosed is the State Implementation Plan (SIP) package for the amendment to the 

2007 Ozone Plan to Extend the Rule Adoption Schedule for Organic Waste Operations 

(Amendment). The District Governing Board adopted the Amendment at a public 

hearing held on December 18, 2008. We request that the California Air Resources 

Board (ARB) transmit the appropriate documentation to the United States 

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as a SIP revision. 

Included in this SIP Package are the following attachments: 

1. ARB SIP Completeness Checklist 

2. Clean copy of the Amendment to the 2007 Ozone Plan to Extend the Rule Adoption 

Schedule for Organic Waste Operations 

3. Underline and strikeout copy of the Amendment to the 2007 Ozone Plan to Extend 

the Rule Adoption Schedule for Organic Waste Operations 

4. Evidence of Public Hearing 

5. Governing Board Resolution 

6. Governing Board Memo 

7. Staff Report with appendices, including Public Comments and District Responses. 

The SIP Package is being transmitted by e-mail to ARB staff. If you have any 

questions, please contact Koshoua Thao by e-mail at koshoua.thao@valleyair.org or at 

(559) 230-5800. The District thanks you and your staff for your assistance. 

Sincerely, 

Scott Nester 

Director of Planning 

Attachments 

cc: J. Lind berg 

D. Brown Seyed Sadredin 

Executive DirectorIAir Pollution Control Officer 

Northern Region Central Region (Main Office) Southern Region 

4800 Enterprise Way 1990 E. Gettysburg Avenue 2700 M Street, Suite 275 

Modesto, CA 95356-8718 Fresno, CA 93726-0244 Bakersfield, CA 93301-2373 

Tel: (209) 557-6400 FAX: (209) 557-6475 Tel: (559) 230-6000 FAX: (559) 230-6061 Tel: (661)326-6900 FAX: (661) 326-6985 

www.valleyair.org 

Printed onrecycled paper.C*
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

Thomas Bragg,

Petitioner

 v.

Warden, London Correctional

Institution,

Respondent 

:

:

:

:

:

:

Civil Action 2:12-cv-1149

Judge Watson

Magistrate Judge Abel

Report and Recommendation

Petitioner Thomas Bragg, a prisoner at the London Correctional Institution,

brings this action for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. §2254. This matter is before

the Magistrate Judge for preliminary consideration under Rule 4, Rules Governing

Section 2254 Cases in United States District Courts. 

The petition alleges that on January 20, 2009, petitioner Bragg was convicted of

one count of attempted murder in the Court of Common Pleas for Lucas County, Ohio. 

He was sentenced to a term of nine years in prison.

Lucas County is within Ohio’s northern federal judicial district. Because petitioner challenges the conviction of a state court within the Northern District of Ohio but

is in custody in the Southern District of Ohio, both districts have concurrent jurisdiction

over the action. 28 U.S.C. §2241(d).

Case: 2:12-cv-01149-MHW-MRA Doc #: 3 Filed: 12/14/12 Page: 1 of 3 PAGEID #: <pageID>
-2-

This Court has the discretion to transfer this action to the Northern District for

hearing and determination. Id. A transfer to the Northern District is appropriate in this

case because it is the more convenient forum and the evidence is more readily accessible

in the district where petitioner was convicted See, Bell v. Watkins, 692 F.2d 999, 1013 (5th

Cir. 1982), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 843 (1983); see also, Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court of

Ky., 410 U.S. 484, 497 n.13 (1973).

Accordingly, the Magistrate Judge RECOMMENDS that this action be

TRANSFERRED o the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio at

Toledo.

The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to mail or email a copy of this Order to the

Attorney General of Ohio, Corrections Litigation Section, 150 E. Gay St., 16th Floor,

Columbus, OH 43215.

If any party objects to this Report and Recommendation, that party may, within

fourteen (14) days, file and serve on all parties a motion for reconsideration by the

Court, specifically designating this Report and Recommendation, and the part thereof

in question, as well as the basis for objection thereto. 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(B); Rule 72(b),

Fed. R. Civ. P.

The parties are specifically advised that failure to object to the Report and

Recommendation will result in a waiver of the right to de novo review by the District

Judge and waiver of the right to appeal the judgment of the District Court. Thomas v.

Case: 2:12-cv-01149-MHW-MRA Doc #: 3 Filed: 12/14/12 Page: 2 of 3 PAGEID #: <pageID>
-3-

Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150-52 (1985); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). See

also, Small v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 892 F.2d 15, 16 (2d Cir. 1989). 

s/Mark R. Abel 

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case: 2:12-cv-01149-MHW-MRA Doc #: 3 Filed: 12/14/12 Page: 3 of 3 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

June 25, 2018

No. 04-18-00407-CV

TRINITY MESA REAL ESTATE SERVICES, LLC and Matthew Coale,

Appellants

v.

SERVICE LIFE & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY,

Appellee

From the 57th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016-CI-05243

Honorable Cathleen M. Stryker, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The reporter’s record is due July 18, 2018, but has not been filed. On June 21, 2018, the 

court reporter, Mary Helen Vargas, filed a notification of late record stating that she had notified 

counsel for appellants that she had received a copy of the notice of appeal and requested that 

counsel provide her with a designation of record so that she could provide him with an estimate 

of costs for preparation of the reporter’s record. However, she has not yet received a response. 

She also noted that due to the failure to provide a designation, leading to her inability to provide 

an estimate for payment, she cannot prepare and file the record because appellants have not paid 

or made arrangements to pay the reporter’s fee to prepare the record and they are not entitled to 

the record without paying the fee. See TEX. R. APP. P. 34.6(b), 35.3(b). 

Accordingly, we ORDER appellants to provide written proof to this court on or before

July 5, 2018 that: (1) they have provided court reporter Mary Helen Vargas with a designation of 

record for purposes of appeal; and (2) that either the reporter’s fee has been paid or arrangements 

satisfactory to the reporter have been made to pay the reporter’s fee, or appellants are entitled to 

the record without prepayment of the reporter’s fee. See id. R. 35.3(b). If appellants fail to 

respond within the time provided, appellant’s brief will be due thirty days after the date the 

clerk’s record is filed in this court, and this court will only consider those issues or points raised 

in appellants’ brief that do not require a reporter’s record for a decision. See id. R. 37.3(c).

We order the clerk of this court to serve a copy of this order on all counsel, the court 

reporter, and the district clerk. 

_________________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 25th day of June, 2018.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
No. 50221.

#### Protests 54529-K, etc., of Columbian Rope Co. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the court found that the facts herein agreed upon were such as to bring the case within the holding in *John Barr*v. *United States*(11 Cust. Ct. 88, C. D. 801), which record was incorporated herein. (See *John Barr*v. *United States,*324 U. S. 83, decided February 5, 1945.) In accordance therewith it was held that the currency of the invoices should be converted at the buying rate in the New York market at noon on the day of exportation (the “free” rate of exchange for pounds sterling), as certified by the Federal Reserve bank and set forth by the collector on each of the entries. The protests were sustained to this extent.
Jump to navigation

            - About
            - Browse Collections
            - Advanced Search
            - Contact

## You are here

- Home  › 
- Browse Collections  › 
- U.S. Government Posters

# Vote: tomorrow will be decided today

                - U.S. Government Posters

## Description

                    -           Title        
                    -  Vote: tomorrow will be decided today 
                    -           Creator        
                    -  United States. Department of Defense 
                    -           Publisher        
                    -  U.S. Department of Defense 
                    -           Subjects        
                    -  United States. Department of Defense 
                    -           Subject: Time        
                    -  1980-1990 
                    -           Series Title        
                    -  DODP ; 101E; DOD P ; 101 E. 
                    -           Physical Description        
                    -  166 × 46 cm 
                    -           Number of Pages        
                    -  1 
                    -           Host institution        
                    -  University of Iowa. Libraries. Government Publications 
                    -           Digitization Specifications        
                    -  Scanned with Ideal Contex Magnum G600 54 Plus at 300 ppi, 24-bit color. Archival tiff image available. 
                    -           Rights Management        
                    -  This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 
                    -           Contact Information        
                    -  Please contact the Government Publications Department at The University of Iowa Libraries: lib-govpub@uiowa.edu 
                    -           Item Type (AAT)        
                    -  Posters 
                    -           Item Type (IMT)        
                    -  jpeg 
                    -           Identifier        
                    -  18765263.jpg 
                    -           OCLC Collection Number        
                    -  429489521 

                - Contact the Libraries
                - Library locations & hours
                - News & Events
                - Help using the Libraries
                - Assistance for people with disabilities
                - Our diversity statement
                - Thank a Librarian
                - Web site/page feedback  OR  general suggestions
                -  

                -  
                - 100 Main Library (LIB)
                - 125 West Washington St.
                - Iowa City, IA 52242-1420
                - 319-335-5299 (Service Desk)
                - ©2020  The University of Iowa
                -
# Official Journal L 313/2022

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 313 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 655 December 2022 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 313

English edition

Legislation

Volume 655 December 2022

---

| Contents | | I   Legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | BUDGETS |
| | * | Definitive adoption (EU, Euratom) 2022/2308 of amending budget No 4 of the European Union for the financial year 2022 | 1 |

Contents

I   Legislative acts

page

BUDGETS

*

Definitive adoption (EU, Euratom) 2022/2308 of amending budget No 4 of the European Union for the financial year 2022

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
(Reap. Dec. 8950)

Entry No. 10622.

#### John L. Westland & Son, Inc. *v.*United States

(Decided July 25, 1957)

*Lawrence & Tuttle (Ban Erik Hedin*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General *{Mollie Strum,*trial attorney), for the defendant.

*Lawrence & Tuttle (Dan Erik Hedin*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General *(Mollie Strum,*trial attorney), for the defendant.

Wilson, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement involves the proper value of a certain HyDRAulic Pbess and parts, exported from Sweden and entered at the port of Los Angeles.

*616At the trial, the case was submitted on an oral stipulation, wherein the parties agreed that cost of production, section 402 (f) of the Tariff Act of 1930, is the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise in question, and that such value is $32,015, including packing.

On the agreed facts, I find cost of production, as that value is defined in section 402 (f) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the involved merchandise, and that such value is $32,015, including packing.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.