alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-31Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications.

 

 

I,Anthony Sfarra, certify that:

 

1. Ihave reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required tobe filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of theWells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Trust 2016-C32 (the "Exchange Act periodicreports");

 

2.Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, donot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3. Basedon my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other informationrequired to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this reportis included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4.Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in thisreport under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in theExchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligationsunder the servicing agreements in all material respects; and

 

5. Allof the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria forasset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment ofcompliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to beincluded in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB andExchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to thisreport, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances ofnoncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report onForm 10-K.

 

Ingiving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on informationprovided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:

 

NationalCooperative Bank, N.A., as NCB Master Servicer, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, asSpecial Servicer, National Cooperative Bank, N.A., as NCB Special Servicer,Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee, Pentalpha Surveillance LLC,as Operating Advisor, CoreLogicSolutions, LLC, as Servicing Function Participant,Computershare Trust Company, National Association, as Servicing FunctionParticipant for the Certificate Administrator, and Computershare Trust Company,National Association, as Servicing Function Participant for the Custodian.

 

 

 

Dated: March 13, 2024

 

 

/s/Anthony Sfarra

AnthonySfarra

President

(seniorofficer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
Opinion filed Au gust 20, 20 09



### In The 

# Eleven th Court of Appeals

____________ 

### No. 1 1- 09 -0 02 09 -CR

____ ____ __ JOHN LAWR ENC E MO NK, Ap pellant

V. STA TE OF TEX AS , A ppellee On App eal from the 413th Distric t Court Johns on Coun ty, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F 37525

M E M O R

A N D U M O P I N I O N The trial c ourt convicte d J ohn L awr ence Monk, upon his plea of g uilty , of ag g ravated sexual assault of a

child. Pursuant to the plea barg ain ag ree ment, the trial cour t assessed his punishment at conf inement for twe nty y ear s. The trial court im posed t he sente nce in ope n court on Oc tober 11, 2004. Appellant filed his pro se notice of appea l on J une 3, 2009, over four y ear s after

the sentenc e was imposed in open c ourt. We dismis s for wa nt of jurisdiction. I n o rd e r t o in vo ke the jur isd ic tio n o f t his c ourt , a

n a pp e lla nt m us t ti me ly pe rf e c t an a pp e a l. T EX . R. A PP . P. 25.2. Appellant has failed to c omply with the require ments of T EX . R. A PP . P. 26.22

a nd 26 .3 fo r p e rf

e c tin g a n a

pp e a l. T he re fo re , th is c ourt do e s not ha ve jur isd ic tio n to e nte rt a in t his appea l. Sla ton v . S

tat e , 981 S.W. 2d 20 8, 20 9- 10 (T e x. Cr im. Ap p. 19 98 ); Ol iv o v . S tat e , 918 S.W .2d 51 9, 52 2- 24 (T e x. Cr im. Ap p. 19 96 ); Ro da rte v . S tat e , 860 S.W .2d 108, 109-10 (Tex . Crim. App. 19 93 ); Sh utev . S

tat e , 744 S.W .2d 96, 97 (Tex. Crim. App. 1988). The a ppeal is dismissed for wa nt of jurisdiction.

PER C URI AM Aug ust 20, 2009 Do not publish. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 47.2(b). Panel consists of: Wright, C.J ., M c C a l l , J. , a n d

S t r a n g e , J.
# Official Journal C 232/2022

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 232 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6515 June 2022 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 232

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6515 June 2022

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2022/C 232/01 | Common catalogue of varieties of agricultural plant species — Supplement 2022/5 (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| 2022/C 232/02 | Common catalogue of varieties of vegetable species — Supplement 2022/5 (
  1
  ) | 27 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2022/C 232/01

Common catalogue of varieties of agricultural plant species — Supplement 2022/5 (
  1
  )

1

1

2022/C 232/02

Common catalogue of varieties of vegetable species — Supplement 2022/5 (
  1
  )

1

27

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

EASTERN DIVISION 

Jeffery A. Johnson, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Muskingum Co. Sheriff's 

Dept., eta/., 

Defendants. 

Case No. 2:13-cv-25 

Judge Michael H. Watson 

OPINION AND ORDER 

On May 5, 2014, United States Magistrate Judge King issued a Report and 

Recommendation ("R&R") recommending the Court grant Defendants Anthony 

Khoury's and Shane Love's motion for summary judgment, ECF No. 66. ECF No. 

76. 

The R&R notified the parties of their right to file objections to the R&R 

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1 )(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). 

/d. at 14. The R&R further specifically advised the parties that the failure to 

object to the R&R within fourteen days would result in a waiver of both the right to 

de novo review by the District Judge and the right to appeal the decision of the 

District Court adopting the R&R. /d. The deadline for filing such objections has 

passed, and no objections were filed. See Opinion and Order on Motion to 

Strike, ECF No. 84 (finding Plaintiff's June 3, 2014 objections untimely as to the 

instant R&R). 

Case: 2:13-cv-00025-MHW-NMK Doc #: 87 Filed: 09/17/14 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Having received no timely objections, the Report and Recommendation is 

ADOPTED. The Clerk shall remove ECF No. 66 from the Civil Justice Reform 

Act Motions Report. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

MICHAELH:WAl"SON, 

~-Ul~ JUDGE 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

Case: 2:13-cv-00025-MHW-NMK Doc #: 87 Filed: 09/17/14 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service 

          - 26 CFR Part 1 
          - [TD 9315] 
          - RIN 1545-BD10 

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury. 

      ( print page 20425)    

# ACTION:

Correction to final regulations. 

# SUMMARY:

                        This document contains a correction to final regulations (TD 9315) that were published in the                         **Federal Register**                         on Monday, March 19, 2007 (72 FR 12902) regarding dual consolidated losses. Section 1503(d) generally provides that a dual consolidated loss of a dual resident corporation cannot reduce the taxable income of any other member of the affiliated group unless, to the extent provided in regulations, the loss does not offset the income of any foreign corporation.                     

# DATES:

This correction is effective April 25, 2007. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Jeffrey P. Cowan, (202) 622-3860 (not a toll-free number). 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## Background 

The correction notice that is the subject of this document is under section 1503(d) of the Internal Revenue Code. 

## Need for Correction 

As published, final regulations (TD 9315) contain an error that may prove to be misleading and is in need of clarification. 

## Correction of Publication 

Accordingly, the publication of the final regulations (TD 9315), which was the subject of FR Doc. E7-4618, is corrected as follows: 

                    On page 12904, column 1, in the preamble, under the paragraph heading “                    *C. Elimination of the Consistency Rule*                    ”, third line from the bottom of the paragraph, the language “application of the dual consolidated” is corrected to read “application of the dual consolidated loss”.                 

LaNita Van Dyke

Chief, Publications and Regulations Branch, Legal Processing Division, Associate Chief Counsel, (Procedure and Administration).

[FR Doc. E7-7780 Filed 4-24-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 80 (Thursday, April 26, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 20921]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-8013]



[[Page 20921]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

April 20, 2007.
    The Department of the Treasury has submitted the following public 
information collection requirement(s) to OMB for review and clearance 
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13. Copies of 
the submission(s) may be obtained by calling the Treasury Bureau 
Clearance Officer listed. Comments regarding this information 
collection should be addressed to the OMB reviewer listed and to the 
Treasury Department Clearance Officer, Department of the Treasury, Room 
11000, 1750 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20220.
    Dates: Written comments should be received on or before May 29, 
2007 to be assured of consideration.

Community Development Financial Institutions Fund (CDFI)

    OMB Number: 1559-0027.
    Type of Review: Revision.
    Form: CDFI 0007.
    Title: CDFI Program and NMTC Program Annual Report including CIIS.
    Description: This data collection is be used to collect compliance 
and performance data from certified CDFIs and CDEs and from NACD 
awardees. This data collection replaces the Annual Survey and parts of 
the Annual Report (OMB <greek-i> 1559-0006).
    Respondents: Business and other for-profit institutions.
    Estimated Total Burden Hours: 14,186 hours.
    Clearance Officer: Ashanti McCallum, Community Development 
Financial Institutions Fund, Department of the Treasury, 601 13th 
Street, NW., Suite 200 South, Washington, DC 20005, (202) 622-9018.
    OMB Reviewer: Alexander T. Hunt, Office of Management and Budget, 
Room 10235, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503, (202) 
395-7316.

Robert Dahl,
Treasury PRA Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. E7-8013 Filed 4-25-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-70-P
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 467 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 467

 Expressing the sense of the Senate that the President should use all 
 diplomatic means necessary and reasonable to influence oil-producing 
 nations to immediately increase oil production and that the Secretary 
 of Energy should submit to Congress a report detailing the estimated 
 production levels and estimated production capacity of all major oil-
                          producing countries.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 4, 2006

     Mr. Thune (for himself and Mr. Frist) submitted the following 
 concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign 
                               Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing the sense of the Senate that the President should use all 
 diplomatic means necessary and reasonable to influence oil-producing 
 nations to immediately increase oil production and that the Secretary 
 of Energy should submit to Congress a report detailing the estimated 
 production levels and estimated production capacity of all major oil-
                          producing countries.

    Resolved, That is the sense of the Senate that--
            (1) the President should use all diplomatic means necessary 
        and reasonable to influence oil producing nations to 
        immediately increase oil production levels to--
                    (A) increase the supply on the world market; and
                    (B) reduce the price of oil;
            (2) a major oil-producing country is a country that--
                    (A) had an average level of production of crude 
                oil, oil sands, or natural gas to liquids that exceeded 
                1,000,000 barrels per day during the previous calendar 
                year; and
                    (B) has crude oil, shale oil, or oil sands reserves 
                of at least 6,000,000,000 barrels, as recognized by the 
                Department of Energy; and
            (3) not later than June 30, 2006, the Secretary of Energy 
        should submit to Congress a report detailing the estimated 
        production levels and estimated production capacity of all 
        major oil-producing countries.
                                 <all>
```
# L_2013155EN.01S00301.xml

| 7.6.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 155/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 155/s3

---

NOTICE TO READERS

Council Regulation (EU) No 216/2013 of 7 March 2013 on the electronic publication of the Official Journal of the European Union

In accordance with Council Regulation (EU) No 216/2013 of 7 March 2013 on the electronic publication of the Official Journal of the European Union (OJ L 69, 13.3.2013, p. 1), as of 1 July 2013, only the electronic edition of the Official Journal shall be considered authentic and shall have legal effect.

Official Journal of the European Union

Where it is not possible to publish the electronic edition of the Official Journal due to unforeseen and exceptional circumstances, the printed edition shall be authentic and shall have legal effect in accordance with the terms and conditions set out in Article 3 of Regulation (EU) No 216/2013.

---
III 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 515 

Expressing the sense of the Senate on the continued presence of United 

States troops in Iraq until at least 2009. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 19, 2006 

Mr. WYDEN submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Foreign Relations 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the Senate on the continued presence 

of United States troops in Iraq until at least 2009. 

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that— 

2 (1) the members of the Armed Forces deserve 

3 the enormous respect and support of the Senate and 

4 the American people for the sacrifices that they are 

5 making on behalf of our country; and 

6 (2) the President’s intention, as stated on 

7 March 21, 2006, that ‘‘future Presidents’’ will deter8 mine whether to keep members of the Armed Forces 

9 in Iraq undermines the preparedness of the United 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 515 IS 

1 States military to respond to other crises and should 

2 not be supported. 

Æ 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
#### Gerland Lee GASS, a/k/a Gerl GASS v. STATE of Arkansas

CA CR 85-95

699 S.W.2d 408

Court of Appeals of Arkansas En Banc

Opinion delivered November 13, 1985

*203*Crawford, Hays & Crawford,*by: *Robert H.*Crawford; and *Henry & Mooney,*by: *John R. Henry,*for appellant.

*Steve Clark,*Att’y Gen., by: *Connie Griffin,*Asst. Att’y Gen., for appellee.

Per Curiam.

The appellant has appealed his conviction of conspiracy to deliver a controlled substance for which he was sentenced to a term of 30 years in the Department of Correction and a fine of $ 15,000. Appellant’s brief does not comply with Rule. 9(b) and (d) of the Rules of the Supreme Court and the Court of Appeals.

 Rule 9(b) requires that a brief begin with a concise statement qf the case sufficient to enable us to read the abstract with an understanding of the nature of the case, general factual situation and action taken by the court. Appellant’s statement of the case does none of these things. Rule 9(d) requires that the abstract of the record contain a condensation of those material parts of the record and testimony which are necessary to an *204understanding by the court of all questions presented for decision and provides that abstracts not in the first person shall not be accepted.

All of appellant’s arguments are based on the refusal of the trial court to grant his motion to suppress the evidence. The abstract does not contain the motion to suppress or the court’s ruling on that motion. It consists of selected and unconnected, verbatim questions and answers but does not contain most of the evidence on which his arguments are based. It gives us no understanding of the facts or the sequence of events on which his arguments are based.

Appellant’s brief is so flagrantly deficient that it causes an unreasonable and unjust delay in the disposition of the case. However, in view of the sentence imposed this court finds that it would be unjustly harsh to affirm the case for this noncompliance.

Pursuant to Rule 9(e)(2) appellant’s attorney will be allowed twenty (20) days to reprint the brief to conform to Rule 9(b) and (d) at his own expense. Appellee will be allowed fifteen (15) days thereafter to revise or supplement its brief.
# Official Journal C 319/2021

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 319 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 649 August 2021 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 319

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 649 August 2021

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2021/C 319/01 | Common catalogue of varieties of agricultural plant species — Supplement 2021/8 (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| 2021/C 319/02 | Common catalogue of varieties of vegetable species — Supplement 2021/8 (
  1
  ) | 19 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2021/C 319/01

Common catalogue of varieties of agricultural plant species — Supplement 2021/8 (
  1
  )

1

1

2021/C 319/02

Common catalogue of varieties of vegetable species — Supplement 2021/8 (
  1
  )

1

19

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
No. 49850.

#### Protest 90481-K of McMinn & Davis Co. (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Walker, J.

At the trial the examiner identified the articles as parts of polo mallets. As paragraph 1502 as modified provides for polo mallets, but not parts of such equipment, the protest was overruled, citing *Huber*v. *United States*(11 Cust. Ct. 55, C. D. 793).
R

• 

ing homes? 

• 

• 

new homes that will likely be built nationally in the 

)

Homes 

2008. 

June 2006 

Water Efficiency Benchmarking for 

educing water demand helps reduce the cost of 

water and wastewater facilities and helps conserve precious water resources. In order to better plan water efficiency programs, however, water 

managers need more information on water use patterns in new homes, for example: 

Do new homes use more or less water than existIf there is a difference between new home and 

existing home water use, is it because of inherent 

differences in the efficiencies with which water is 

used, or simply because the new homes are different in size or the number of residents? 

Is it possible to use advanced technologies in new 

homes in order to reduce water demand? 

To answer these questions and provide an empirical 

basis for understanding water use in the 14 million 

next 10 years, the U.S. Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA has funded a grant project that will collect data from several large water utilities across the 

United States. 

Water Efficiency Benchmarking for New Single Family 

is a nine-city research study funded by EPA to 

establish baseline indoor and outdoor water use patterns for new homes by collecting empirical data from 

billing records, surveys, and indirect measurements. 

The project will also demonstrate how the use of 

advanced technologies can reduce new home water 

use compared to homes with water-using equipment 

that meets current standards. The study will investigate relationships between household indoor water 

use and key variables such as number of residents, 

size of home, and types of fixtures and appliances 

present. Outdoor water use will be quantified from 

total annual use, rates of application, local plant water 

requirements, lot size, landscape design, and type of 

irrigation system controller. 

The study will look at “standard” new homes and 

“high-efficiency” new homes built to enhance water 

conservation. This will assist with establishment of 

targets for builders who wish to provide buyers with 

increased water efficiency options, develop specific 

performance criteria, and create a special designation 

to help consumers identify them. The study results 

can also enhance the efforts of states and water utilities to establish performance criteria for water use in 

new homes. 

EPA awarded a $350,000 grant to the Salt Lake City 

Water Department to coordinate the multi-city study. 

Each of nine study water utilities will contribute 

$20,000, for a total project budget of $530,000. EPA 

anticipates the study being completed in December 

Water Use in 

New Homes 

EPA-832-F-06-014 Recycled/Recyclable—Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 100% Process Chlorine Free Recycled Paper. 

New Single-Family Homes